TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StraightGangstaHack Archive

View 5 posts and 52 comments by StraightGangstaHack on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I've never seen statistics, but anecdotally my gay male friends 100% get laid more than my straight male friends.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:34 AM
6

You're right. Though it all interrelates. Women are absolutely choosier, because the cost of their choice is much higher, and this is 100% explainable through evolutionary biology and this is why their attraction works this way. It evolved that way. So in a sense, it is entirely based on attraction, but only because everything you say is also true. Humans are animals but we can think and reason. We can create cultures and religions and rules, and go beyond our instincts. Is it a coincidence we u…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:25 AM
19

You're 100% right. And worse when these boys overcome their fears and do start shooting their shot, they strike out over and over and over again. Yet their female peers do not. The dating app data tells the sad tale. How can you have a huge jump in sexlessness among young men, but yet, not among young women? What a riddle. Whatever could be the answer. :) And the CNN editors made the headline "Americans less likely to have sex" - not "Young men less likely to have sex." Also CNN: "Nazi holocaust…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:14 AM
3

Yes, indeed. The article cited in the r/science post doesn't mention gender even though there is this massive, eye-popping gender disparity in the data. Isn't that something? Whyever could that be? Amazing cartwheels and backflips. But it's the elephant in the room in that data, and some other articles in other newspapers (like the Washington Post one) found it too huge not to at least mention it.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:09 AM
8

Yeah, isn't it funny how Youtube marks counter-narrative content like this "sensitive" and turns on the age gate? It's "soft censorship." They're hoping for exactly this response.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:07 AM
46

I definitely recommend watching Gender Attraction Differential. Women think 90% of men are "below average." That's not reddit hyperbole, it's fact. There's a mountain of data from the dating apps proving it. It's one of those awkward, counter-narrative facts, though, so many men are still not fully aware. The number of sexless young men is so much larger than the number of sexless young women because young women now prefer to share (aka have casual sex with) "top 10%" guys, rather than make a co…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 05:44 PM
8

They all have "history of waiting" if you feel like believing what they tell you. They're not even aware they're lying. Keeping one objective set of facts straight all the time is extra work, and most never learn how. Words are just a game and that is just how they play. There might be two of them in 100 that will make a really hot guy wait the evening, let alone the weekend. Zero of 100 will admit it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 11:33 AM
4

This.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 11:23 AM
7

Omg I'm dying at this one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 11:18 AM
5

As described in our history chapter, the no-fault or "unilateral" divorce laws of the 1970s and the child support guidelines of the 1990s have remade American society. In many states it is now more profitable to have sex with a high-income person and collect child support than it is to be in a long-term marriage with a middle-income person. In virtually all states it is more profitable to have children with multiple partners than to have multiple children with the same co-parent. Residents of mo…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/20 01:16 PM
13

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Trump and Trumpism are the biggest calamity are nation has faced in a generation, but I am honor bound to say, his administration is right about this issue, and this executive order is a good one. Woke identity politics are strategically incompetent. They are morally repugnant. They are widely hated even by liberals, and they are often what introduces them to the experience of being afraid to truthfully express their own political views among their frie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/20 02:01 PM
14

You're right, of course. Women are privileged in our society, and not by a little. By a lot. One of the things that makes their privilege work is a narrative - a belief system - that convinces people that their privileges don't exist, and if they do, it's deserved. Victim narratives have been used to create social power throughout history. But you saw through it. Seeing the truth is powerful, even when it's ugly. Don't stop looking for more hidden truths! The world is full of them. There are ple…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 11:55 AM
1

Ok. So I'm not gonna sugarcoat it. They get that for free. We have to work for it. It is unfair. Life is not fair. The question then becomes, is life worth living? I'm gonna tell you yes. Maybe you don't always believe it, right? Foresight is imperfect. You're that sure you can see the future? That all sounds like some cliches and kinda generic, so let me make it specific for you. We'll hone right in on the thing you're thinking about too, which is being desirable. For women, it might seem like …
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:53 PM
35

You're not alone. Our world really is enormously unfair. It especially kills me how women are both so privileged, yet still considered victims. I mean, the female gender has clearly been victimized. Just, not in the west, not today. There are pros and cons to each gender. Female benefits outweigh the disadvantages, in the present day western world. They are so privileged, they even invented a bogus social theory allowing themselves to be openly sexist. They based this on fiction about "power dyn…
/r/MensRights19/07/20 02:55 AM
1

Now that she's got the ring, she finds sex with her husband "disgusting." My goodness, what a novel problem. We've never heard of such a thing before. "I still get horny and sometimes masturbate on my own a few times a week, which he doesn’t know about." She goes to Slate's hive of misandry for advice. To my surprise, the pornstar in residence didn't immediately encourage her to open the relationship, but instead listlessly suggested some things that will never work. Remember folks: when you bec…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/06/20 05:18 PM
4

To quote a comment I saw on TwoX: a guy who is a '7' will happily fuck a '5' and never talk to her again, in fact he'll probably fuck her over fucking another '7' that he's already fucked a bunch. being a new fuck adds a few points to your score a woman who is a '7' will pretty much never fuck a '5'. she's going to fuck 7s through 10s this happens because the guy who is a 10 will still fuck a 7 because he's designed, like all males, to fuck every woman who lets him the woman 7 who fucks 10s will…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 11:37 AM
3

There is usually a journey, involving genuine risk, and real reward. Every society did this differently. Some face it together, with brotherhood, under the guidance of elders and experts (groups of boys learning to survive in the wild; physical or martial competition, of increasing intensity). Others emphasize an individual experience of extremity (take a dangerous hallucinogen, or simply stay awake for days, or otherwise put yourself under extreme physical and metaphysical duress, survive alone…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/20 09:31 AM
5

If you're not feeling confident, don't do it. Going in with "maybe it'll make me go crazy for good?" as a mindset will make for the worst experience of your life. Pointless and existentially awful. Go in with a high comfort level and confidence, or don't go.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/20 09:22 AM
4

Don't know why I had to read so far down for this comment. The fight for supremacy between genders is just so sad, and such an underperformance by a species capable of reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/20 06:07 AM
3

There's no cognitive dissonance in being both for self-sovereignty, and against prostitution, if you understand Stanton's goal. Both increase the value of the female's primary asset - their pussy. Prostitutes give men an important alternative to marriage and game. Sure, with hard work and skill (and good looks don't hurt), we can periodically get pussy for free, but many men are happy to pay up front, for services on demand. Such a supply of cheap pussy devalues the asset between every woman's l…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/20 12:10 AM
1

There really should be one of these fallacies for argument by misapplied fallacy. :) It's not a straw man at all; he merely points out that you're really working over there, producing a lot of words, and in your haste to virtue signal with the same zeal modeled in the classroom, you just missed the point, imagined something beyond what he said to argue against, and ran hilariously far in that wrong direction. One observation you may find helpful, and possibly appreciate as a psychologist in trai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 09:38 PM
1

Oh, I believe this one is called the Traitorous critic fallacy, but Red herring, and Appeal to Motive could apply. Now that you mention it, your poorly constructed arguments in apparent service of a rigid ideology incapable of questioning itself feels rather... conservative to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 09:23 PM
1

If I can sum this up: The genders are mostly the same, So ignore the obvious and massive differences that are widely and readily documented, (Insert mis-applied reference to unrelated logical fallacy, in an attempt to look smart), Denial of widely known and easily provable facts, sans evidence, Attempt to apply this semester's readings on Eskimos to explain the rest of the world's non-Eskimo outcomes. This one is cute; here we enjoy the appeal to authority of citing a study, but ignore the actua…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 09:12 PM
2

Amen, brother. Beautifully said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 12:06 PM
4

I thought we had a lot of good science on sexual dimorphism, physically and mentally. The trend among men is that they will more often win physical competitions. And I believe there is no magical barrier that protects the brain from the rest of the genome in this phenomena. For instance, men will more often win at chess: https://en.chessbase.com/post/explaining-male-predominance-in-chess Women on average are just not as good at chess. It is not close. The phenomenon has been amply studied. This …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 11:45 AM
11

You're seeing it clearly while many still are lost in the fog of culture, propaganda, illusion. That always leads to feeling a little crazy, but it's not in your head. I doubt if there was some feminist cabal that planned 30 years ago for it to turn out this way. But if there were, 2020 is the year they'd celebrate victory. Wow is it a woman's world now. They absolutely rule, socially and sexually, just as you observe. And that's just the beginning. They're awarded custody (in most US states) an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 02:59 AM
2

My success rate overall, or with when they try to lock me down and I say no? Overall, nothing special and nowhere near some of my friends. Which is part of why I bring this up: I'm not some super HVM, and this still works for me. When they try to lock me down (or when I preempt it)? I expected a majority of women to call my bluff and make my refusal to "go steady" into a deal breaker. I'm at 0% so far. I don't think that means anything other than, I was ready for that to be hard, and it was way …
/r/TheRedPill29/02/20 12:59 PM
6

I'm not worried what people feel about it. I was that guy before trp that thought it was unimaginable to defy the system of monogamy, even though a) it never seemed quite right for me, and b) girls were always cheating. With me, on me, around me. It was valuable for me and non-obvious to learn I could just go into relationships and control my destiny on that. But most surprising, I though most girls would call my bluff on that and bail, and it turned out for me it was the opposite. That's insigh…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/20 12:49 PM
1

This expanded my perspective. I'm just old enough to remember more masculine institutional culture. When the truth mattered more than feelings. When someone fucked up horribly and someone else pointed it out, the greater sin wasn't being critical and hurting their feelings. Old enough to have been asking, over the years, what the hell happened? Why did everything degenerate? Was this just some particularly bad cultural wind shift? You give a cogent explanation for what it is and why. Thank you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/02/20 12:38 PM
15

People can sense when you're being really honest, and the truth is powerful. I just tell them the truth. I'm not trying to date a different girl every week. I just think the secret to lasting happiness in relationships is being good for your partner, not trying to keep them from finding anything better. If it's not for them, I totally understand. Wish them the best. Confidence is sexy. Even the ones who try to fight the frame, can't seem to help finding it alluring that I had the audacity. Only …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 03:03 AM
20

Not as high as some. The 10s get chicks just by standing there. They can treat a girl like garbage and it just turns her on more. It's such a thing to behold. I'm above average but nowhere near that. I'm in shape. That made a huge difference. My career is going great. That helped a lot too. But honestly, it was serendipity: I reached a point where I just didn't give a fuck. Funny how that changes the result you get. And so I went on not giving a fuck. Why try to play their game and pretend, when…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 02:53 AM
9

I just really don't give a shit what girls do. I know they're going to cheat no matter what they say. It doesn't bother me as much as it bothers some people. And it amuses me to blow their minds, tell them my deal, and see what they do. If they're the jealous type, I don't want them anyway. Ever had a girl tell you about the jealous shit she puts her husband through, while you're banging her? I have. Everyone finds their own groove on this stuff. I don't begrudge any monogamists their thing, it …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 02:05 AM
120

A few years ago, I worked with a 10/10 Chad. Guy was from the islands. White women in the city loved him to death. Once as he and I went out for lunch, a girl cold approached him. His response: "I've got three girlfriends already. But if you want to be number four..." He got her number. Life lessons. I tell every plate right up front, monogamy is a hard pass for me. I'm not going to go chasing them around and trying to police what they do, and I just ask the same in return. It is absolutely amaz…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/20 05:51 PM
2

Other thoughtful bits: Every group which possesses anything which is necessary to the health and well-being of any other group, is bound to be pursued, wooed, bribed, paid. The monopolistic class, or sex, in turn, learns to withhold, to barter, to become "uncertain, coy and hard to please," to enhance and raise the price of her commodity, even though the economic basis of the transaction be utterly concealed or disguised. All this is exactly as natural and inevitable as a group of wage workers d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 02:03 PM
2

Thanks for sharing this. I'm pretty floored by how well they predicted the modern world in 1918. They were just glimpsing the end of the patriarchy, but understood many of the implications. They correctly note that women had ruled our species until very recently - just the advent of agriculture - and were regaining their leadership again. They were wrong, obviously, that we would arrive at a post-capitalist Utopia, free from all want, but what were they right about? What rings true in 2020? THE …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 01:55 PM
2

I'm a "survivor" and, while it was shitty, nobody IRL cared. So, I put it into the bucket full of shitty things I've experienced from other people, and I moved on. I'd say even "tragedy" is too strong a word. But that's just me personally. It's a good question, though. How serious is it? I'd say, look at how we treat it in men. It's only that serious, no more. You know what's way more serious? Forcing unwilling men to be fathers. Consent to sex is not consent to reproduce. Yet we have an epidemi…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:51 PM
61

"As described in our history chapter, the no-fault or 'unilateral' divorce laws of the 1970s and the child support guidelines of the 1990s have remade American society. In many states it is now more profitable to have sex with a high-income person and collect child support than it is to be in a long-term marriage with a middle-income person. In virtually all states it is more profitable to have children with multiple partners than to have multiple children with the same co-parent. Residents of m…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/19 12:11 PM
6

Just found this great thinkpiece about this by an economist: https://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2019/05/seeking-arrangement-might-just-burst.html?m=1 tl;dr - as the stigma against profiting from your pussy disappears, and the internet makes it so easy and lucrative, young women increasingly choose it over the dismal prospects of school and work.
/r/MGTOW02/11/19 09:00 AM
1

And that doesn't even count the female fringe benefits: walking around knowing you can end the careers of any of your male colleagues with a word, increased freedom from disciplinary action (or as she calls it, "my manager being toxic, bullying and sexist"), and the desperation of companies and teams to hire you as an amulet against claims of bias.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 08:30 AM
2

Historically you had to be concerned that the young man would knock her up without assuming the (enormous) religious and economic responsibilities. With the advent of birth control, welfare and feminism, this went from being an existential problem to being a notional one. Or, less so in more traditional communities where religious responsibilities still matter. Which is most often where it persists. Echo of an instinct. The simple enjoyment of dominance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/19 07:51 AM
5

Unpopular opinion: ripping bonghits and fucking other people, with and without her husband's approval (or participation lol) is of no concern to me, and honestly I would prefer politicians that are honest about it to those who lie (and how many other elected officials have things on the side? It's gotta be above the 50% national average). But until men can resume fucking their employees, my dear, I'm afraid you must keep it in your pants as well, otherwise you might pay a small fraction of the s…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:01 PM
12

Uh, we literally had to see Anthony Weiner's cock in the news. So, not even that.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:32 AM
25

She could have just admitted, "I honestly thought banging my staff was OK, since I'm a woman."
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:31 AM
10

You're not wrong, although the state of most relationships is also hilariously compromised. If the science is right, something like half of the people reading this right now, who are in committed relationships, have been or will get cheated on. In one sense, the decision here is only whether or how much you'll know about it. Not whether it will happen. There are societies today where the penalty for adultery is death, and it still happens there. Attempting to ban this has been a permanent failur…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:46 PM
10

This but unironically.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:38 PM
16

Meaning, always attempting to extract income via their vagina.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:37 PM
1

remindme! 20 years
/r/MGTOW28/10/19 11:33 AM
10

http://www.realworlddivorce.com They compiled a lot of data from all 50 states.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 04:18 AM
8

This is why I will never live in any of the common law marriage states. Any place where a girl can grab your assets just by claiming you let her sleep over too often... Yeah, no fucking way. Why does any man voluntarily live like that?
/r/TheRedPill23/10/19 11:06 AM
1

http://www.realworlddivorce.com/
/r/MGTOW21/10/19 05:46 AM
13

Hah. Yeah, this speaks to me. And in the middle of all the bluepilled bullshit advice you get when a "relationship" hits those rocks, I was lucky to come across one writer that just laid it out: "there is no fixing a dead bedroom. When she's no longer attracted to you, that is unfixable. Your relationship is over." And I realized, it was true. The fucking funniest part? When I finally dumped her, wow, magically her sex drive returns. We had more sex in the weeks while I was kicking her out than …
/r/MGTOW20/10/19 05:26 PM
7

Ah yes. #believeallwomen, aka your freedom exists only at the whim of all women.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter