TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Swatieson Archive

View 11 posts and 151 comments by Swatieson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1058

DiscriminationSwatieson/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:27 AM
985

Social IssuesSwatieson/r/MensRights06/12/24 08:21 PM
756

Social IssuesSwatieson/r/MensRights19/03/24 05:26 PM
679

FeminismSwatieson/r/MensRights05/06/24 02:50 PM
234

Social IssuesSwatieson/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:10 AM
200

DiscriminationSwatieson/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:38 PM
48

Social IssuesSwatieson/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:36 PM
23

HumourSwatieson/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:29 PM
13

Social IssuesSwatieson/r/MensRights10/12/23 06:40 PM
5

Swatieson/r/MGTOW03/05/19 06:39 PM
0

Social IssuesSwatieson/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:27 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If the subject is politized the papers and studies are published basically with pretend-filters because they are filled with blatant fallacies. Pure propaganda. For instance, make the effort to read the very quoted "97% scientists agree with humans causing climate change". It is an embarrassment to actual science.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 07:24 AM
2

r politics is peer reviewed.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 07:19 AM
7

AIPAC handlers won't allow it.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 05:29 AM
1

You would get banned anyways if your review gets any traction.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:33 AM
7

In first grade we had legal immunity. Now we don't.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:49 AM
11

We have La Manada in jail 15 years for a false accusation. Don't believe anything you read online or watch in the media, just read the discrepant vote of one of the JUDGES.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:41 AM
5

lmao. Imagine passing all publishing filters with that shit.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:09 AM
5

It's incredible how looking like a decent human is so rare in that part of the political spectrum. They are completely consumed by actual hate. Every accusation is an admission.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:58 AM
2

I bet the 5s have the same demands. Can anyone confirm? I was always with 8s.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:58 AM
1

Not eradication as they couldn't maintain civilization without men. They want enslavement.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 03:37 AM
1

You used the wrong symbol and the wrong number of them lol.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:04 AM
14

I don't understand what is the point of "adulting" and "maning up" besides be responsible enough to make a comfortable living. Fuck adulting. It just serves women.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:00 AM
10

I am divorced and the last thing I would ever do is get back in the plantation. No matter how good the woman is. Freedom is everything.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 08:57 AM
3

47% of the vote for the worst candidate in the history of America is a lot.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:08 PM
2

Didn't expect a noticer here.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:06 PM
4

Soon men will no longer bother to get promoted and will do the bare minimum not to get fired. In the medium term no men will want to be employed in a big company.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 10:04 PM
4

If you could timetravel and tell yourself you wouldn't listen to yourself. Hormones are hormones.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:54 PM
3

She will just morph into you so watch out. It's a trap.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:53 PM
16

On their mgtow sub (which is really no-children, not no husbands) they are talking now about carry permits. The lunacy is unbound.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:05 PM
4

Rules only apply to marriage-material men, AKA betas. Chad will still be able to raw-dog them as he pleases.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:51 AM
6

He got out of his safe space and fucked up.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 09:20 PM
2

link? Google is blatant propaganda not point searching anything against the narrative there.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:01 AM
2

They need to be portrayed as the good guys to the Western peasants so nothing will happen to them.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 03:53 AM
3

He will eventually be fully banned so take a snapshot.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 03:41 AM
1

It's more like the ex of your wife broke into your house to kick your ass because you were hitting her and she called him for help.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 03:34 AM
2

We saw it in practice with covid and Russian invasion. No nuance admitted. You are picking their side or you are dehumanized.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 03:27 AM
-30

Wikipedia is just the Jewish liberal view of any topic.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 12:55 PM
25

They are not anti racist or pro women, they are anti-white men.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 06:47 AM
6

Replace men with "blacks", "jaws", etc.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 06:46 AM
1

Which product are you guys breaking now? :P
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:02 PM
1

Tell me your ways mister. How?
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:43 AM
4

She probably thought you deserved that because some stupid thing you did. Women's sense of justice is fucked up.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 12:37 PM
27

The most common one is that they think we are intimidated by successful women. The real explanation is always that they only consider men the people they like, and that requires the men to be more successful than them. A successful woman is rarely young and because of that successful men with options will discard them and go for the "unsuccessful" young women. That in the narcissistic POV of women translates in "scared of successful women".
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:24 AM
11

I am divorced and have much more cash available than when I was sharing expenses, and my income hasn't changed much. A lot of money saved in "social" entertainment (long weekends, restaurants, airplane tickets, and so and so) Marriage is a money pit.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:11 AM
2

They are substituting men with the Estate. They are even talking about laying off only men when hard times come. And if all fails, they will introduce a bachelor tax.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 07:08 AM
9

Let's say they fear the type of man who notices what's going on. The other types fight each other so they are no problem at all, on the contrary they are desired here and that's why they import them.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 11:36 AM
1

International Boxing Association: "Point to note, the athletes did not undergo a testosterone examination but were subject to a separate and recognized test, whereby the specifics remain confidential. This test conclusively indicated that both athletes did not meet the required necessary eligibility criteria and were found to have competitive advantages over other female competitors." "These tests affect the private life of the person concerned and constitute medical information protected as per…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:37 AM
-1

There is more than testosterone levels. I will remove the post as the far left is quite belligerent on this and I don't want to create another account.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:23 AM
1

And the passport is based on a quick surface-level visual inspection in the Algerian health services.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:20 AM
0

Do you really care about the answer mate or is it a strategy to get people banned? Khelif was disqualified after sex verification and the specific details never disclosed, but the authorities hinted Khelif had no XX chromosomes.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:20 AM
1

According to the current accepted rules, men have the right to identify and transition to women and thus competing in women's sports.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:16 AM
0

This is incorrect, but the truth of what it was really going on will probably get you a site-wide ban.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:09 AM
14

Only a specific group of men is systematically attacked by TPTB. Only one.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:22 AM
40

Why do people care about that obvious liberal fearmongering campaign? Nothing in it will be passed by a RINO Congress.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 05:19 AM
25

I was top 1% as girls cold approached me before apps existed and still not installing that shit.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:48 PM
1

The writer is a woman and I am sure she just transcribed what her and her friends experienced in real life.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:40 PM
1

Samantha is what the alphabet people wish a trans woman would be.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:37 PM
2

Exactly. Maybe I should be embarrassed I am enjoying it.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:35 PM
7

The sad thing is that most are like that but the true nature depicted in the show is never exposed to men in real life.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:10 PM
-3

In what season do they hate men? Not at all in the early seasons at least.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:09 PM
0

Samantha is unrealistic. My experience as a spy is that the other three are quite realistic, at least in the early seasons I watched.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:07 PM
2

I don't think they hate men at all at least in the first seasons I watched.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 08:03 PM
0

You have to see it to understand. It is something in between both extreme caricatures.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 07:20 PM
5

Thought the same and started watching 25 years after it aired.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 07:19 PM
50

We are just tools for them. She is trying to set impossible standards for her more attractive and younger competition.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:55 AM
5

[You have been banned from participating in Reddit for hate speech]
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:39 AM
3

Js are great at storytelling and most people fell for this specific bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:38 AM
14

Men will end up being their own employers, working by contract. Office jobs are just a recipe for being enslaved and parasited.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:33 AM
18

The only reason it has not been demonized and banned is because it is the custom of a certain tribe.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:18 AM
13

You can open up to us bro.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 04:05 PM
5

If I had a daughter I would tell her to marry and have kids asap and then pursue a career, not to depend on the husband. If I had a son I would tell him to build a career and then have kids with a young woman.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 10:12 AM
2

In practice, consent is that your actions are in line with the girl's hallucinations at the time. If she thinks you are going to marry her but you have sex without any intention of marriage, you raped her.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 05:14 AM
2

La Manada provided VIDEO of the supposed rape and were convicted anyway. One judge produced a disagreement vote stating that was obviously not rape. It was an abomination of a case.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 05:11 AM
1

"I don't remember if I gave consent, I was very afraid". Consent doesn't really matter with these laws.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 05:00 AM
2

Yes. It is even worse than that. We have decades of experience. At the beginning they just demanded that the victim's declaration made sense and didn't contradict itself or any evidence present. Now it does not matter, they omit the lying bits from the declaration and sentence with what cannot be proven false.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:55 AM
8

We had a massive case in Spain. La Manada. All you read online and in media is a lie. You just need to read the disagreement vote from one of the judges and the final sentencing to understand they were declared guilty without anything against them, not even the "victim" declaration, who backtracked her statements. It will make a great movie when the truth can be told. It was even worse than that Simpsons episode.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:48 AM
4

That's the point. Note the race in the picture and the name of the writer.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:16 AM
91

"They (men) need to be raised". So men dating women 4 generations below is ok so we can raise women too?
/r/MensRights05/06/24 03:13 PM
1

You don't. Lions don't care what sheep think.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 06:59 AM
1

The plan is a labor government to get them back into the EU.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:58 AM
2

Women will be drafted but they will never see combat.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:57 AM
3

It's being used as a scapegoat for migration sex crimes.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:40 AM
13

It's sad when you realize that, as you naturally want to be with women but your upper head says absolutely not.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 09:30 PM
1

So it is easy to top your competition.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:24 PM
14

3 women divorced Brad Pitt.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:00 PM
1

Walking dogs or CrossFit gyms are good places to meet decent girls.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 12:58 PM
1

Women at the end demand commitment and a safety net for their prole. That's the way it is, and they way we are programmed. But offering that is only worth it if she offers you children who will be highly competitive of reproducing themselves (ie, smart and beautiful, ie with a hot mother and a smart father) and take care of them. Their end is rarely offered so there is no point in marrying at all. "Situationship" is just a glorified multi-night stand.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/24 12:57 PM
3

I've been with a woman for 20 years. She was fine, no major complaints, but they make your life miserable. The amount of work you need to put in for everything to go well is insane and not worth it. If it was like that with a beautiful and nice woman I cannot believe how it can be with the average one. Never again.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/24 10:36 AM
3

Similar here. I am at a point that if the perfect woman flirted with me I would ignore her completely. I love women but they are not worth the complications. Life is /1000 simpler without women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/24 08:47 AM
1

Best she can bring are reminders you are not their father if you give your opinion.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/24 08:03 AM
6

Not only that. They can state men's opinions and men cannot contradict them.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:13 PM
1

The kind of 20yo woman is much worse if you wait to 40.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:45 PM
3

And that's a good thing!
/r/MensRights17/05/24 04:37 PM
5

Correct. If we go to a lower number of citizens, what? They lived better than us with less population. The problem is when they try to replace us with people from shitholes to maintain the population number so they can continue with the ponzi scam.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 04:08 PM
6

Not even my opinion I just refused the explanation attributed to men by a woman.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 04:05 PM
7

Plus note: you will want to go after 20yo so start moving at 30.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:57 PM
13

Same. It's ok not to want children but it is concerning when the people not wanting them reach a critical number. It's ok and logical to be concerned about that, abstracting yourself from the global picture, but apparently that's not possible for certain egocentric groups.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:55 PM
18

It's fascinating their way of thinking. I am not having children but I know that's wrong for our evolutionary mandate. On the contrary, feminists can't get themselves out of the picture and as they would be troubled by the consequences they reject the main premise straight away. And in the end it won't matter as that feminist way of thinking will be removed from the gen pool.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:04 PM
32

They were asking about my opinion but I was banned before doing so lmao. My opinion is basically based on evolution, but evolution is only convenient for mocking christians.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:39 AM
74

I had to collage the thread as a lunatic mod went on a removing hysteria. Note the purple person comments. I am the blue one. I am childfree myself but they have to resort to name call me "breeder", "forced birther" "baby-trapping and women controller promoter". Scary how many psychos are out there.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:10 AM
7

you don't.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:28 AM
10

Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men of commitment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/24 02:25 AM
8

Notice that only applies to white men. Wonder why?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:03 AM
17

Regardless of the reasons, we need to regulate these kinds of companies. They play dirty censoring and pushing narratives with absolutely no transparency when they should be regulated as utilities. Can you imagine the phone service listening to your conversation and hanging up if they don't like what you say? We need boomers out of the government to regulate the modern world.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 05:03 AM
3

Because you would be called antisemite.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 05:04 AM
28

If I had a daughter I would tell her to marry smartly at 23yo after college and then pursue her career as a backup. if I had a boy I would tell him not to marry at all.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:13 PM
54

I've been married to a hot woman making MUCH more money than me. Still expected to be some kind of orchestra dude being at the top of wisdom, entertainment, tour guiding, bodyguarding, humor, problem solving, sex, psychologist, coaching (oh my god I hated coaching). Still not worth it. Everytime I see a hot strong independent woman with a great career I think of the poor bastard suffering all that.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:10 PM
8

Obvious answer what would OP expect in this sub?
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:02 PM
24

Cannot abort paternity in any period or time.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:51 PM
0

Sex is an inanimate abstraction. It is they way it is. Same reason we are taller.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:54 PM
6

It's funny they become creationists when the evolutionary explanation is inconvenient.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:59 AM
44

The real answer is evolution: women don't sexually prefer inoffensive men. Each sex models the other one. We prefer peaceful women. They prefer aggressive men. That shows generations after generations. So it's women's fault.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:16 AM
1

Answer with evolution: Each sex models the other one. Violence is a less desired treat in women by men but more desired in men by women. The genes are passed that way generations after generations. So it's women's fault. If you didn't want that outcome sexually select peaceful men. Add on top any violent women were easily killed, making it difficult to pass on those genes.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:10 AM
49

"only 13 people were murdered in our city. the tragedy is 3 of them were women". This was said by the Major of Madrid.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 03:29 AM
25

Regards with t is banned, as if that would make them smart or something.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 03:27 AM
1

Source? Not even trying Google as that company is total propaganda.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 01:17 PM
35

There are a lot of shows about surviving on an island. In one special one, producers decided to have two teams, one formed by men and another one formed by women, each on different islands. It had to be stopped shortly after the start. Guess why?
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:56 PM
20

The trend is women occupying all overhead positions where little is done and what it is done does not matter much and men occupying the real value jobs. Of course all making the same money regardless of position.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:43 PM
27

Of having privileges over competent men.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:38 PM
52

That's happening in police departments in Europe. When you talk with male officers they say going with a female partner is a liability for them and citizens.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:26 PM
20

HR are the ones putting the women quotas in the first place. Good luck contacting them, as you will mark yourself as a target.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:23 PM
26

If you see the comments most are quite proud anyways.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 01:45 PM
55

Twitter is now a "cesspool" according to them because there is no censorship. What's preventing them to block and not following people they don't like? Those lunatics are only interested in pushing their bullshit propaganda.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 10:53 AM
44

I took a snapshot of a reasonable response that I knew it was going to be deleted. Judge by yourself: https://i.imgur.com/QuqnBYA.png
/r/MensRights27/03/24 10:04 AM
13

Good take from the "owner" perspective, but there is a certain point where your hires take over that kind of decisions and hurt your intended 3/4 of competence.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:13 AM
166

I was told to hire a woman. Not sure why they hadn't made this demand beforehand. Because if the best applicant was a woman they wouldn't have to take the risk of giving an illegal order. If we assume gender has no impact on competence and you try to achieve a certain gender proportion different than the proportion of candidates then you are statistically picking less competent people as you could and hurting your company. Add on top that if the same quota system is applied to build the candidat…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:09 AM
43

The thread is sorted by controversial, of course by "best" you get the typical incel-naming-hate speech.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:30 AM
2

When the love hormones kick in you are defenseless against the plantation, but with 40 hormones retired long ago you are safe.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:03 AM
71

I am divorced and without women life is 1000x less complicated.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 05:39 AM
16

"Do you want to spend yet another night at home, playing video games, jerking off to porn, and downing some Mountain Dew? Do you want to drink another bottle...or two...of wine while you watch yet another Hallmark movie?" Well that sounds great to be honest lmao.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 09:23 PM
1

What's the book of the review?
/r/MensRights11/03/24 06:09 AM
1

The best examples of this are covid and climate change papers. Pure propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 06:02 AM
6

They are banning TikTok soon. The accusation? What Meta, Google and Reddit are already doing right now.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:16 PM
2

Elon is their primary target right now. They know he won't play along in the psyops prepared for the next election.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:14 PM
4

They even do the Chauvin thing but the other dude doesn't die. How strange.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:08 PM
0

The propaganda here is laughable, totally for regards. They talk in terms of cartoon characters.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:05 PM
3

This sub will be banned as it is the only place left where these things are discussed.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:04 PM
9

Obviously it was never about gender equality.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:56 PM
21

The other day I saw a video about women being proud of a female astronaut. Did you guys feel any pride in having male astronauts?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:49 PM
1

Why Britons always trying to prove that they are better than US?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:46 PM
-48

IMHO, that only works if you have your wife by the balls somehow. She would dump a SAHD at the earliest opportunity if she could. Edit: https://media1.tenor.com/m/RbnaVKj3e88AAAAC/why-are-you-booing-me-im-right.gif
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:49 AM
58

Let me guess: you arrived at home and found your wife doing chores, right? She was idling most of the day until you were about to arrive.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:45 AM
56

Stay-at-home-momming was always a racket. Most days' chores could be sorted out in 2 hours but of course they needed to pretend it was worse than working 10h out there. My mother waited to do everything when my father was about to arrive, to fake it was like this the whole day.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:43 AM
8

Lol the feminist anchor doesn't know how to express her transphobia. https://twitter.com/YAhoraSonsoles/status/1765074525778260232
/r/MensRights06/03/24 09:06 AM
1

What's a non binary?
/r/MensRights01/03/24 10:15 PM
42

By 2050 whites will be a minority in their home countries. Marriages stats will be whatever other cultures do abroad.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 10:09 PM
2

The idealized love is not an option. The best you can get is real love, which is much worse than the idealized version.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:05 PM
2

Why are we different? It's very easy and explained by evolution / sexual selection: Women select the top 20% of men in various metrics. Men select the hottest women regardless of anything else. Accumulate that for hundreds of thousands of years and well... Evolution is only convenient to bash Christians.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:07 PM
1

Yeah but what about the brain? There is where they don't want to go at all.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 02:12 AM
5

Chad is the government and it's already committed to them.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 02:02 AM
8

There is no rational reason to become a provider. It's just instinct. But they messed up with the inputs our brains receive to act against our interests and fucked up. Social engineering backfired.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:54 AM
8

"social science". If you have to put the word "science" it's not science.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 04:04 AM
4

Themselves.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 09:37 AM
8

It's voluntary mate, the contrary of involuntary.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 08:22 PM
7

Living together is off the table.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 08:20 PM
3

The other day I was browsing a post about car commercials. Only the Russian one had a white family in the car with the man driving. A Mercedes with 400HP driven by a strong and independent black woman.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 07:15 AM
16

The "elite" knows they can control men through women and women through the media.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 05:27 AM
1

Late to the thread but she will ruin your life just to not be accountable in front of her husband. Report her to HR immediately before she does.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:39 AM
2

It's a junk science sub.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 07:58 AM
13

Can I be your suggar bro? I can play some xbox with you whenever you want. $1000/mo thank you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/18 10:52 AM
2

You must do the bench press correctly. Look for Mark Ripettoe videos on YouTube. The best one is one with him teaching a guy with a mustache. Edit: https://youtu.be/4T9UQ4FBVXI
/r/askTRP02/08/17 06:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter