TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TardisTechnologist Archive

View 1 posts and 249 comments by TardisTechnologist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That just seems like such a vague and ridiculous law.
/r/seduction17/11/17 02:20 PM
8

Really though? They're just filming people in a public place. How can there be legal ramifications? Because they're making money on it or something?
/r/seduction17/11/17 04:16 AM
2

See that's a proper study done in accordance with the scientific method. It's good. This is what we need. The "study" OP linked is utter nonsense without any scientific basis. It's the same inconsequential drivel you'd see on an anti-vaccine blog. Spreading nonsense "research" like this just stinks of cherry-picked anecdotal evidence. It's what feminists do. We need to be better than that if we have any interest in giving this cause some actual credibility.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:12 PM
1

Please note that we cannot draw any conclusions from this "study" whatsoever. If they were reprimanded after the research it means they didn't consult a research ethics board first, so the study itself was conducted illegally anyway. You'd be stripped of your credentials for this. There's really no indication of whether the methodology was sound, whether it was scrutinised by qualified professionals at all, etc. This honestly just reads like an agenda piece, not like a scientific paper of any so…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 08:35 PM
294

It's just a mistake by whoever wrote the article. Lena Dunham is a loopy feminist who has publicly and in detail described how she sexually abused her sister when she was younger. Similar to how Amy Schumer talks about how she was somehow a victim when she fucked a blackout drunk guy who kept passing out, but would have anyone else who did that hung drawn and quartered for rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/17 08:41 PM
2

This sub is literally a male mirror of /r/feminism most of the time You'll have to explain what it is you mean by this, preferably with examples. The first example that comes to mind is the huge shit-flinging fest that occurred on this sub when a single cinema decided to do an all-women screening of the Wonder Woman movie. It's an example of something that's a complete non-issue which was extrapolated by MRAs to be some kind of huge society-wide oppression issue which needed everyone in the worl…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:20 AM
2

You make excellent points, my point was that OP didn't make any of these points in his message. I acknowledged that it is an issue, the point is that OP's message without the context you have provided is completely empty.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:48 AM
25

Yep, absolutely. There's just so many factors not being considered here. Guy saw one out-of-context statistic and started screaming "MUH EQUALITY" just like an angry feminist would. The first thing that comes to mind is that he didn't cite the prevalence of colon cancer in women, so we have no idea if it's actually a gendered issue (it is, but the info isn't provided, OP is comparing apples to oranges). Aside from that, there are screening programs in place for both colon and cervical cancer, bu…
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:41 PM
3

This is why I don't want them to come for our guns. As soon as they have those, they come for our urinals, and then we will truly be lost.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:03 PM
1

DON'T WORRY ABOUT SOMETHING GOING WRONG WITH YOUR FIRST TIME! My advice for this is to get obliterated drunk with some girl you know you can seal the deal with so that you don't care if it goes wrong and have an excuse for not knowing where to put it
/r/seduction11/10/17 11:33 AM
9

Green"peace" are a virulent anti-science organisation. Had they and other large environmental groups been on the right side of nuclear power when it first started to rise in viability, it is likely we would be far less dependent on fossil fuels today and would be further from the mess we are headed for with climate change. They are also abjectly opposed to GMOs despite the fact that GMOs when used correctly are saving lives, preventing famine, sparing people from disease, and feeding people in m…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 07:51 PM
0

Grad project at uni? Good fucking luck and power to you.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:35 AM
1

Like I said I'm aware there are medical conditions which cause weight issues and I wish you the best in discovering yours. That doesn't refute the point anyone else in this thread was making about eating too many calories though. Not saying you should starve yourself and feel like shit just because you're burning less calories than usual all of a sudden. Just saying good luck getting healthy again.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:27 PM
2

Okay well initially we were talking about being overweight, which is a simple matter. Even if you have a rare medical issue causing you to gain weight like a thyroid condition it is still a relatively simple matter with the right care, so again good luck to you.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:01 PM
6

That's good, you've taken the first step. Step 2 is to stop eating all food and only eat ice cubes instead. 😉 Kidding. While the other guys are being perhaps a little harsh and confrontational, what they say is not false. What's wrong with your health is a very simple matter, and I wish you the best in resolving it.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:20 PM
113

And that's fine, as long as you don't write an article about it specifically designed to berate men while promoting "body positivity" for women. It's fine that you have preferences, like everyone. The difference here is that your head isn't in the clouds, you accept the reality that unless you get in shape you're probably gonna have to (to quote the article) "settle for an overweight (wo)man" or just wait it out.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:56 AM
0

I don't think you understand what "pick our battles" means. If you pick a battle any time an opportunity presents itself to be offended by something you are not picking and choosing, you are taking on every battle. Just like feminists who get offended by anything they possibly can. Many people consider our movement a joke and if we are fighting over non-issues like Ladies Nights then we are proving their point. This is a sad hill to die on.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:56 PM
-31

IMO we need to pick our battles and this isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 10:17 AM
1

Does she straight up not drink alcohol at all? If not then I would say it's probably not worth the bother.. There's still a lot of girls that don't party every weekend but still know how to have fun. It's hard getting to know a girl if you can't take her out for a drink
/r/seduction28/09/17 09:51 PM
5

That's my go to. "We should go out for a drink/go to X together sometime, give me your number and I'll text you"
/r/seduction04/09/17 05:13 PM
32

It's the way they've been treated by men that made them crazy /s
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:24 PM
1

You can get shadow banned, which means you can post etc and it'll look like you posted but it doesn't actually get published.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/17 01:40 AM
4

you mean echo chamber and hypocritically sexist hate speech forum Pretty sure that's the Oxford dictionary definition of "safe space"
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/17 01:39 AM
0

Blatantly so. There's a lot of butthurt incels here whooshing hard and saying DAMN U BURNED THAT BITCH.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/17 12:58 AM
8

In what world would a girl seriously request that a guy have an 11" doing and be over 6'7"? Just wrap your head around how freakishly tall that is for a second. That's well above what girls consider "tall" in a sexy context. How could anyone even possibly think that wasn't a joke, and in that sense a jab at the very girls we're laughing at here - those who publicly set ridiculous standards.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/17 12:55 AM
0

Basic inference? In what other possible context would the guy's response make sense?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/17 10:15 PM
-7

There are girls saying "Be 6' tall and 8" or get out", yes. This girl is quite blatantly making fun of those girls by making jokingly unrealistic standards which nobody would ever sincerely ask for (6'7" and 11"). The guy is not only whooshing hard on her joke, he's also using it as an excuse to rip on her when she's obviously pretty cool/nornal/whatever, not a stuck up bitch like all the incels here are making out.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/17 05:50 PM
3

Really seems like she had a sarcastic over-the-top bio as a joke and he just used it to rip on her and call her fat
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/17 03:51 PM
10

They might fire someone and give her a nice cash package and apology. It's a great opportunity for pandering and a huge publicity stunt, makes sense from a business perspective because the media is infested with feminism and the rest of Schumer's rhetoric.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:34 PM
37

I want enforceable legislation the guarantees me 50% custody of my children. I want Equal Sentencing legislation for female criminals. You just have to phrase it differently. Say you want to ensure females are granted custody at an equal rate to males, and that you want equal sentencing for male criminals. Say you want to eliminate the rampant sexism in the judiciary system. They'll lap it up without realising they're supporting actual equality, not the feminist brand.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:52 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/seduction23/07/17 06:32 PM
25

Yeah, it's true. Obviously doesn't stand for all cases but in most cases mature women who are still dating have a lot of experience and know what it's all about. The biggest difference I've noted is emotional intelligence, though. Older women know what they want/need emotionally. Most girls in their twenties have more unfulfilled and undiscovered emotional needs IME.
/r/seduction23/07/17 05:33 PM
2

I agree. After seeing this post originally her role in Game of Thrones was tainted for me; then I realised she's like 15 and has no clue what she's talking about, and she also has to subscribe to feminist indoctrination as a high-profile woman in the public eye. Saying shit like this is a good carreer move for her. It annoys me but there we go. It's not like I have ever paid her a cent while enjoying the show anyway. It's a good testament to the mind and nature of feminism, though. It's a dogmat…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 12:59 PM
1

This is the first time I can see doxxing being legitimately justified, because then at least someone could find the guy and warn him he's about to be sexually assaulted and face wage slavery or prison for the following 18 years
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:23 PM
7

In Canada as I understand it, if they've lived with you for a set time frame (I think it's 6mo or 1yr+) they can claim it as a common law relationship in every legal sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 03:46 PM
1

Agreed. This sub is basically as bad as /r/feminism now. I'm not sure why I'm even still subbed.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:01 PM
104

This reminds me of Sweden's gender-neutral snow plowing initiative which failed miserably
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:31 PM
10

Actually men outnumber women now https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio It's so close to 50/50 that calling women a minority is still beyond ridiculous though
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:02 PM
2

My only advice for you is don't jump in headfirst all excited about landing your first date. Tell yourself that you date and fuck other girls all the time, this is just another pickup, and she's the one who wants validation from you, not the other way around. Exude confidence and indifference. You're a boss. Get some kino going and if it ends up being a night date then go into it knowing she'll be hanging off your arm by the end of the night. Good start, keep the smoothness flowing.
/r/seduction04/07/17 12:41 AM
1

Doesn't really matter how you close as long as it feels natural. If you want to go low key but with some kino then open the door and "push" her out (don't actually push her..) with your hand on her back saying it was fun etc. If she seems like she's hanging around go for the kiss. I typically try to avoid showing any obvious PDA because it makes it all seem more like a relationship which sends the wrong message. Obviously sometimes this can't be avoided, for example you are in a super romantic s…
/r/seduction02/07/17 01:06 PM
2

Hug at the start is good, don't fuck around and be awkward just do it. Any time you are leading her somewhere, for example letting her through a doorway or around a corner, is a great time to put your hand on her back and "push" her through. If you're getting there with kino later on in the date anyway then you're probably doing it enough. Early kino only really plays a role when you're approaching girls in bars etc and you need to exude a ton confidence to attract their attention and signal tha…
/r/seduction30/06/17 06:29 PM
4

can't I just exist and be enough for someone? Yes. You need to exist and be enough for yourself before you will be enough for anyone else. The first rule of seduction is being in a head space where you are all the validation you need, you don't need validation from someone else. You are the fucking alpha male. Women want after you, you don't base your self-worth on their perception of you. Stop blaming your race. Yes some women will be less attracted to certain races or may be straight up racist…
/r/seduction30/06/17 06:16 PM
1

Maybe we are just talking about girls that travel vs girls at home, rather than North American vs European vs UK girls. Travelling girls are obviously more likely to be friendly and outgoing. Also in general people are more receptive to/interested in foreigners. I know my British accent helps a ton with Canadian girls.
/r/seduction30/06/17 06:03 PM
4

I grew up in the UK, have spent all my post teen years in Canada though with some travelling in Europe. I mean, I guess when I'm travelling everyone I meet in hostels etc will be more talkative, but European (mainland European) girls seem very receptive compared to North American girls. They are typically more cultured and confident, North American girls are more sheltered and consider any approach an affront to their dignity. Generalising of course. You're lucky because you can fly to Europe fo…
/r/seduction30/06/17 05:36 PM
-1

European girls are way more confident and talkative than North American girls in my experience
/r/seduction30/06/17 03:56 PM
2

I normally try to pick up on something about them, something they were talking about or doing, drinks they are ordering, etc. If there's nothing immediately apparent I just go for "Hey", look them in the eye and smile confidently. Normally they will say hey back and you can pretty much gauge the way the conversation will go from the tone. If she's smiling and it seems positive you follow with "How are you doing tonight?" or "I'm iamx" and shake. As a note, if you're doing this at the bar, don't …
/r/seduction30/06/17 03:48 PM
5

This is true. In terms of having great sex, fucking her brains out and knowing you can do it again tomorrow, casual sex relationships and dating are the best. But you can't beat the feeling of leaving a girl's house in the morning with her roommates checking you out and knowing you went from not knowing her to going all the way with her in a couple of hours of drinking and playing the game. Both offer unique experiences, I get what this guy is saying though, the sex and overall benefit is way be…
/r/seduction29/06/17 02:20 AM
2

Unfortunately it is pretty important as you stated in your first paragraph. The main thing though is that women are looking for someone who isn't a bum, earning (significantly) less than them or just from a lower socioeconomic bracket. Socioeconomic status says a lot about a person in terms of whether they will have similar interests and aspirations so it's not all just about money, it's about your overall standing with yourself and in society. If you are a motivated individual and you have a he…
/r/seduction22/06/17 02:22 AM
3

This isn't an issue for fucks sake This is exactly the type of post that is reducing this sub to a cancerous male mirror of /r/feminism
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:43 AM
1

I normally try to ask for a date and number at the same time because it's a nice segue for the conversation - "Do you want to grab a drink sometime this weekend? I should get your number and I'll give you a buzz" seems easier to me than just "Can I get your number?" The party option is easy when you're in uni because people are often looking to go party close to campus on the weekend and they'll normally have some mutual friends and a good excuse to go/leave as they like, it's more noncommittal …
/r/seduction11/06/17 05:06 PM
1

She's just playing power games. She wants you to know she's not under your thumb and that you still have to work for it. Two options - a) work for it, she might roll with it when she feels like it but it's unpredictable. b) play the same game back, act like she's not worth the effort even if she is. If you keep her on the back foot she will become keen again, if you let her know she's not worth the games then she will quit playing them. Personally I'd do option B, as option A relies entirely upo…
/r/seduction11/06/17 04:46 PM
1

Next time it's a good idea to try and secure something, either a date or a #. Chat for a while and when the interaction comes to a natural close ask her if she'd like to get a drink sometime and get her #. Alternatively invite her to a party or something you know is going on that night or weekend, that way it's a little less committal and she can bring friends if she wants to be more comfortable etc.
/r/seduction11/06/17 04:05 PM
15

Or point out that we live in a society which drives mentally ill men to the point of doing this. Is becoming a suicide bomber what male privilege looks like?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:08 PM
1

With each girl you talk to it's a good idea to scout your chances of taking her home. For example, ask her if she went anywhere beforehand - most likely she will say she had pregame with her friends. At that point you can ask if she lives downtown, or if she went to her friends' place, etc. If you normally aim to take girls back to your place (best practice if you live DT, unfortunately I don't) then this isn't as much of an issue, but your viability questions can be instead more like "Are you g…
/r/seduction05/06/17 10:17 PM
1

The clock is ticking, if you leave it too long it'll be weird to approach her again. Next time you have class go looking good and just go talk to her. Don't feel like you need an excuse.
/r/seduction05/06/17 10:08 PM
1

sigh If this movement wants to be taken seriously, it has to pick its battles. Feminists don't do that well, which is why their movement is a fucking joke in this decade. We'd do well to learn from their mistakes.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:09 PM
0

You've highlighted exactly my point - that by kicking up a fuss about fucking nothing, we are sinking to their level. Having a push-pull where the MRM is as flawed and useless as modern feminism just on the male side of the spectrum doesn't help anybody. If we are going to criticise feminists when they kick up a fuss about ridiculous non-issues such as this, we can't turn around and do the same screaming "muh double standards" about a hypothetical male-only screening which nobody would go to any…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 07:38 PM
2

Because demanding that somebody donate to something is ridiculous. DC have nothing to do with this, it was the theatre alone. Seriously how can anyone have a problem with this? The fuss everyone here is kicking up is embarrassing and makes us all look like man-children.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:24 AM
34

That would be ridiculous. Can we just fucking let these people have this one thing? It's a fundraiser too, for Christ's sake. The amount of fuss people are making about it is an embarrassment to the MRM and is perfectly reminiscent of the victim complex fragility bullshit of feminism that we laugh at on the daily. Sometimes the members of this sub would do well to look in the mirror and see their own hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:23 PM
26

For every argument that says "feminists (insert anything)" the first reply will always be "that's not TRUE feminism. In TRUE feminism we will live in a utopia of... (etc)". It is a textbook example of the no true Scotsman fallacy and it's a tired as shit argument with no value. The rest of what s/he said is actually pretty valid though. Regardless of what you think feminism is, it's a sinking ship.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:10 PM
86

Seriously. It's such a fucking non-issue. If the feminists want to simultaneously declare that they're strong and empowered but also need a safe space from men in the fucking cinema let's just laugh and let them have it. Also who the fuck wants to go to an all-male screening of a movie? Nobody. Men and women are different, they socialise differently, let's set an example for feminists by accepting that fact and moving on.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:08 PM
1

I used to have a lot more success irl than online, my Tinder game was utter shit even though I thought I had decent photos and chat. Irl is easier for me for a couple reasons but I picked up my Tinder game massively by having a female friend take a couple flattering but not obviously posed photos of me, and picking through my fb photos to put some decent ones on. I'm a pretty attractive guy but I look like utter shit in most photos so that might just be it. Since revamping my Tinder I've been ha…
/r/seduction31/05/17 04:21 PM
2

I disagree on both counts. Short texts are good in early days, they've already been on a couple dates and had proper conversations though. It's not necessary to keep playing the same game at that point. For the second point I think he should just let her be. She's obviously comfortable having sex with him so it's not that, I think trying to get more out of a girl after she's already sent a pretty clear message is greasy.
/r/seduction31/05/17 04:13 PM
4

To be honest though mate it doesn't matter whether or not she's telling the truth. Firstly because OP is right in saying that sometimes even if everything goes right it won't work out long term. Secondly because OP learned and shared a valuable lesson from it. Thirdly because OP demonstrated the right way to deal with this kind of situation - just be chill and open-door about it, don't take it personally and don't try to convince her otherwise or milk anything else out of her. You will get situa…
/r/seduction31/05/17 03:59 PM
2

Second what this guy said, the kiss thing isn't a big deal. I go on a lot of dates and they either tend to end with a hug at most, or sex. I can only think of one instance where I ended a first date with a kiss and she initiated it. Not a big deal at all, and if you make a big deal of it it's more likely to go bad - if it happens then it happens, if not no biggie.
/r/seduction29/05/17 12:18 AM
6

Thank you. We criticise feminists for pulling exactly this same bullshit, and then upvote the same to the front page. What a joke.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:43 PM
5

We fault feminists for cherry picking stats and making claims based on non-controlled data. And then we upvote this shit to the front page. Wtf is wrong with this sub? It's embarassing
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:42 PM
3

They aren't your yardstick. YOU are your yardstick. This is it. This is what people need to know.
/r/seduction13/05/17 11:25 PM
1

Don't base your self-worth on your perceived success or value to others mate. You don't need to get laid to validate yourself, you don't need shit from anyone else. Doing and being what you want is up to you, the other shit will come with time and if it doesn't then it doesn't matter anyway. Fuck anyone else, don't live through others, live for yourself.
/r/seduction13/05/17 11:22 PM
4

I just browsed the top this week for a quick grab and couldn't find an example so I'm sure it's a confirmation bias on my part, when I see those types of post I notice them. This thread though was the most recent example I could think of. It's patently ridiculous and the comments are pretty silly too. Either way, just the way I interpreted your comment was as taking up a standpoint I actually also hold but have noticed happening in this sub. Maybe I'm guilty of a fallacy here as the other guy sa…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 10:37 PM
-3

You're right about falling into the same trap. Many of the posts in this sub are a direct male-filtered mirror of the arguments feminists make which we rightfully dismiss as trivial or fallacious, but suddenly jump on board with when men are in the equation. Lots of cherry-picked facts, skewed stats, etc.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:10 PM
19

In a way yes, but the point is that Everyday Feminism is a resource which is actually quite popularly cited and shared by "everyday" feminists. The point I was making is that while some moderate feminists may insist that the ass-backwards radical feminists are a small minority, they are actually a large and representative group with which everyday feminists are choosing to associate themselves. For the record, I'm not joining the unexplained downvote storm because you are actually making valid c…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:09 PM
25

Both movements are riddled with insanity, hypocrisy and counter-productive nonsense imo, albeit through a good cause and with plenty of positive aspects on the way. Some stuff on this sub is good content but I'm critical of most the posts I care to comment on here. I don't think there's harm in using this as a space to criticise feminism or the MRM as long as it's valid criticism.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:08 PM
352

I actually love the website Everyday Feminism because of the name. The website is riddled with the absolute idiocy which many "moderate" feminists insist doesn't constitute true feminism. Well, here's a website titled "Everyday Feminism" with a large "everyday feminist" following which postulates that insert ridiculous theory/idea put forward by feminism constitutes what everyday feminists believe. So are you a feminist? Do you want to be associated with that idea? Or are you an egalitarian or s…
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:04 PM
1

I oppose the draft flat out, I'm not trying to justify male disposability. But to put women in combat roles where they are disadvantaged, increasing danger to both male and female troops in the name of equality is absurd.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:06 PM
1

😂 this made it to /r/all? How embarrassing for the sub
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:28 PM
0

These people are misinformed. Most militaries allow women in roles which could potentially be filled by a draft, but not in combat roles. The vast majority of military roles are non-infantry roles which women and men are both perfectly capable of. The only roles where differences in physical performance have a large impact are direct infantry roles, which women should not qualify for unless they can reach the physical standards of able-bodied men, which almost all women cannot. That doesn't mean…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:24 PM
1

No they shouldn't, if they do they should make it less shitty and awful first, but also if you want to go out postering make it about real issues which actually affect men every day, like homelessness and inequality before a court of law. The draft doesn't currently affect any US male and it never will. And I assume you're not posting these in Switzerland or North Korea where all able-bodied men actually have to undergo military training and duties in case they get drafted.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:17 PM
2

You are dreaming. America will never fight another war where the draft is required. That's ridiculous and outdated.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:12 PM
0

It does in this sub. It used to be a decent discussion sub but now it's literally just a male mirror of /r/feminism. People complain incessantly about complete non-issues where any discrepancies arise between genders. Drafting women won't give men any more freedoms, removing the draft completely would. But this sub is a shit slinging fest of "women have x so men should have it too!". It's identical to everything we rightly criticise about feminism, but nobody can see that a lot of the MRAs in th…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:10 PM
1

It depends on the girl honestly. Some girls are impossible to hold a conversation with over text, if there's no natural conversation happening I'll just get to the point. If the conversation takes itself away I'll roll with it. It's still a good idea to work on sealing the deal in a timely fashion, though.
/r/seduction06/05/17 12:49 PM
3

Other girls wanting to fuck him and them knowing Him knowing he could fuck other girls in the situation if he wanted. If you walk into a club/bar knowing that you could sleep with half the girls there if you want, and acting like it, it'll come true. The more girls you are chatting to, the more girls you aren't chatting to will notice you and want to chat. You have to be chatting to several girls to pique the interest of the ones you'd want to take home.
/r/seduction06/04/17 02:49 AM
1

She's skinny and white, so they still have that to be offended about
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:49 AM
5

Gotta disagree with you, Sir Knight. Starting your rebuttal with a personal attack rather than an argument. Nice one. Those of us in the real world have had plenty of encounters while under the jnfluence, some of which ended in 'staying the night'... I've fucked plenty of girls after a night out thanks, none of them were pissing themselves and unconscious though. The fact that I draw the line somewhere makes me a decent human being, I like to imagine. As for the rest of your argument, I agree to…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:42 PM
19

Gotta disagree with you guys on this one. The girl was literally passed out and had pissed herself, the cabbie was stopped by the police with his pants unbuckled and hers pulled off. "Caught with your pants down" has never been so applicable. However you swing this, he was clearly taking advantage of her. This is very different from the "fucked a guy drunk then regretted it and cried rape" bullshit y'all are used to seeing on here.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:32 PM
3

This sub fucking blows now
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/17 05:46 PM
1

This feels too civil. I feel like I'm supposed to call you names or something. You can call me a Nazi if you want, and I'll retort in all caps that you're a SJW edgelord or something of the sort. You down? ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 12:49 AM
1

Yeah, that's the point I'm refuting - people who think gender is entirely fabricated by society. The reality is that there are both biological and social components, and the biological component is much larger than many would have us believe. The title of the thread refers to the "gender is only a social construct" argument so that's what I meant to address.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 12:47 AM
2

Just look at literally any part of the animal kingdom. Lions are an example of an animal that don't conform to "traditional" (at least by human standards) gender roles. Lions have lion gender roles. Humans have human ones. That's all I was getting at there. We've largely overcome this but to say that it's caused by some oppressive patriarchy or capitalist bogeyman etc. No one saying this. A massive proportion of the population thinks this. Gender roles are the result of an oppressive patriarchy …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/17 12:21 AM
1

I doubt someone who actually studies gender would make such an absolute statement. If you read carefully I specifically avoided absolute statements. Gender obviously has a socialization component, but even society is at the will of evolution. My point was that those who think gender is completely independent from sex, that is, that when you're born you have no inclination to one gender or another until you're socialized into it, are wrong. I'm aware this is a minority but there are still many pe…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 11:40 PM
2

To flat out say that gender roles are not socially constructed like alot of people in this thread? Sorry, but that's wrong. It isn't though. The vast majority of traditional gender roles are founded entirely in biology and the evolutionary advantages of sexual dimorphism. Only in the last few hundreds of years (vs hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution) have we created a society where we can overcome innate gender roles. If anything it's the other way round: freedom to chose roles is …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 11:34 PM
20

Sure. The assertion that gender is a social construct which is entirely independent from sex is fucking bonkers, though. Even if you view gender as a set of behaviors and identity factors which can be fluid or changed, suggesting that these behaviors are not intrinsically linked to biological sex in an extremely close way is ridiculous. The idea that behaviors typical of males and females are 100% determined by socialization rather than by biological differences is objectively inaccurate and def…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:54 PM
5

You missed the most important one, YYZ
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:43 PM
1

reject sex This is indeed a problem
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 11:13 AM
2

True. It's hard to hook up with girls if you are asking if they're on BC while getting naked though.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:41 AM
15

The "unfairness" comes in when you consider the fact that the woman has a second choice to decide though, whereas the man does not. At this point an accident becomes a bargaining piece where a woman can make a decision that hold a man to ransom and the man has no say in that decision. I admit they both took the risk in the first place, but in some sense there is more risk for the man than the woman as she always has a "fall back" plan.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:34 AM
3

I've debated this topic many times both off and on reddit, and yours is the only compelling argument against "financial abortion" that I've heard. Good stuff.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:32 AM
1

FYI it's "devil's advocate". An advocate is someone who sides with or represents a person/cause, eg. Someone may be a Clinton advocate, or a pro-life advocate. To play "devil's advocate" is to side with the devil, that is, take up an intentionally contrary or wrong position, as you did.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:29 AM
5

Absolutely. I'm 100% game for it but I hate condoms and after a few drinks I'm sure I'll say "fuck it" and within a couple months my nads might turn blue and drop off...
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:25 AM
1

The point is that in any situation, unless there is intentional sabotage (ie telling her you had a condom on and you didn't actually put it on), an accidental pregnancy is a 50/50 mistake. You both knew there was a small risk going in and you both chose to take it. As such, both should equally bear the consequences of this accident. Both should have a second chance to say "I don't want to have a baby". Currently men do not have that choice, only women do. People are freaking out about women's re…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:22 AM
1

I agree, but I think one method is enough. That is, a condom alone is fine, but the responsibility should be with both the male and female. If you're a woman and you don't want to get pregnant, make sure he uses a condom, and you'd do well to have one ready. Same as if you're a man.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:19 AM
1

I'm interested in this, since the hormonal male contraceptive as far as I've read is an intramuscular testosterone injection. I don't know how that works but is that not similar in some way to taking anabolic steroids?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:17 AM
169

Wow I can't believe your boss almost raped someone like that /s
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 02:16 AM
7

I love seeing these idiots use the word "unlearn". It has a doublethink indoctrination ring to it, but they throw it around like "unlearning" is an enlightened thing to do. Seems to me they've already done enough unlearning.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:29 AM
3

Moreover she was obviously saying it in jest, I know sarcasm is hard to detect on Facebook but come on... This is some low key back and forth banter. No pussy pass anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/17 09:56 PM
2

Where's the pussy pass? Where's the part where it was denied? This is just a fucked up story about a traumatised and abused young girl and the tragic and wide-reaching results of a failure for the judicial system and the protective services in place to prevent this happening in the first place. Seriously, this doesn't belong on the sub at all. It's tasteless to see anything that isn't completely unsavory about this story.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/17 12:05 AM
3

She openly spoke about it in a public address, even detailing how the guy passed out several times while they were at it, and stating that she was stone cold sober too. She goes on in the speech to talk about how much the experience empowered her, how she felt afterwards that she didn't need to sink to being a "last resort" for drunk guys, and how much better off she is having literally taken advantage of this poor bastard. She would literally be in jail right now if the genders were reversed, t…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 06:16 PM
1

By the feminist definition, which I'm sure she subscribes to in a gender flipped context, she raped someone.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 03:28 PM
134

"Knockout" as in "You'd have to be knocked out to touch her". Like that one time she sexually assaulted a hammered (to the point of passing out) guy, then gloated about it (it's okay because she's an empowered woman).
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:35 PM
45

I agree. It used to be good, when the content was about women unfairly trying to use their sex to their advantage and getting shut down. Now its just "lol this woman didn't get away with (incident which has nothing to do with being a woman)". It's a shame.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/16 12:34 AM
8

I love the way feminists use the word "survivor". They claim it's to remove the idea of women being victims, when realistically they are just perpetuating the victim complex by sensationalizing the issue as much as possible. Sure, sometimes rape happens alongside homicide, but sometimes armed robbery ends in homicide too; you don't hear people flapping their mouths about being "burglary survivors". Unless there is a risk of death from the subject itself, why use the word survivor? Leave it for c…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:30 AM
2

people of weight Please don't let this catch on
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:18 AM
2

You can't make this shit up
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:50 PM
13

Equal Opportunity Employer Lol
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:38 PM
30

Can we not start on the "1 in 6" bullshit. Sometimes this sub directly mirrors the insanity of feminism. This exact statistics is the same falsified garbage feminists were spewing before they jumped to 1 in 5, then 1 in 4...
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:47 AM
12

60% of them should go to women if 60% of applicants are women. This suggests that woman are favoured as applicants, ie they will make up 60% of overall applications but say 75% of successful applicants.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:56 PM
1

It sounds the same in an American accent
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/16 10:14 AM
1

Really. This is so obviously fake and stupid it's ridiculous. Is this sub now populated by 12 year olds?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/16 10:13 AM
2

Am I the only one who doesn't think this is an issue? Casually prodding fun at our differences isn't sexism. Feminists kick off about this kind of stuff constantly and we (rightfully) laugh at them for being upset over trivial non-issues. This sub is descending into a male parallel of /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:24 PM
2

She won't
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/16 10:03 PM
11

Agreed. It's a known and documented fact of our species that women are more sexually selective than men. It's not a product of human society, because we see similar behaviors in almost all species of animal: one gender is more sexually selective and the other more sexually competitive. Tinder isn't creating this phenomenon, it's just highlighting it.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 10:14 PM
3

What he says is real, and has nothing to do with your own insecurities. "As a man I've never felt threatened in a public space before" is real? Give me a break. Men are more likely to be the victims of violent crime than women. If you're walking alone in the wrong end of town at night, men and women both have different reasons to feel threatened, sure; but the idea that men physically cannot feel threatened in a public space is a joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/16 02:44 PM
5

In this case there is clear, documented and tangible evidence of consent being granted. It's perfectly plausible that this consent was retracted or not granted after the scenario changed, but there is no evidence whatsoever of this. Why the judge chose to act upon he said/she said testimony rather than the limited available evidence is beyond me.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:43 PM
8

You are required to have good reason to believe your partner consents. Like a text that says "Come over and have hot sex"? Seems like a decent reason to me
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:12 AM
15

exactly. even if a woman offers no resistance it can be considered rape? how the fuck does the guy know it's rape then? If she isn't signing an "I consent" contract every 30 seconds, according to the modern feminist narrative
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:10 AM
1

He'll never be allowed back on our platform any time soon.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:12 PM
4

Women have always been the primary victims of men being thrown off bridges. Women lose their husbands, their sons, their fathers to being men thrown off bridges.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 03:27 AM
29

Imagine if we started a movement called #malelivesmatter to challenge the accepted norm that men constitute 80% of suicides, 99% of combat deaths, and another disproportionate amount of violent crime victims. We'd be ridiculed and labelled as sexist.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:41 AM
50

3 or 4 years Lol
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:59 PM
2

DAE feel empowered by shutting the door in the next person's face instead of holding it open?
/r/MensRights02/07/16 09:17 PM
-27

The fact that they set out trying to reach a predetermined conclusion completely invalidates them as scientists, though. Edit: okay it was an innocent hypothesis. I got caught up in the "intending to show" terminology.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 05:23 PM
22

She's a vile cockroach. Can't stand her, especially after seeing this.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/16 03:02 AM
0

If you tick that just for being female, I'm betting they ignore it. I doubt it. Women are considered a "minority" even in everyday society where they are in fact a majority. Because the patriarchy, and stuff.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:11 PM
10

I recommend reading it. It's one of the most widely recognised novels of the 20th century, set in a dystopian "future" (written in the 40s) where the government controls everything including what people see, do, and think. It's the origin of the phrase "big brother" or "big brother is watching you". It's uncomfortably reflective of what the radical left seeks to achieve in the current political climate, silencing any voice of dissent and brainwashing those who disagree to see the "truth".
/r/MensRights10/04/16 03:02 AM
3

Agreed. Protest the Hero for example (coincidentally another Canadian metal band) are one of my favorite bands, musically they are fantastic, but some of their lyrics are so far-left white knight pussified it's painful.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:03 PM
3

I think he thinks the other guy meant "Progressive Conservative" by PC rather than "Politically Correct".
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:04 AM
9

To be fair a large part of MRA, even if it isn't about simply opposing feminism, is about undoing the damaging and oppressive laws put into place by the feminist movement. Child support, alimony, lack of reproductive rights, unfair divorce settlements, demonisation of men and boys and treatment of them as stupid, violent, or worse, the rape culture assertion, driving men away from education, etc.It's all damage being done in real time by the feminist movement, so even though pointing the finger …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:40 PM
1

A large component of MRA is pushing back against the damage done by feminism if I understand correctly. Preventing indoctrination of children into feminist ideals fits into that category. That said, this specific article comes from quite a questionable source so approaching it with skepticism is (as always) the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:28 PM
1

I was mocking the SJW rhetoric that discriminatory profiling is evil and wrong unless it's done against men.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 12:21 PM
7

BE CAREFUL EVERYONE I WENT OUT ON THE STREET AND THERE ARE PEOPLE THERE. STAY SAFE XOXO Also, isn't telling people to stay safe and avoid sketchy streets considered "victim blaming" these days?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 08:15 PM
13

It's racist to say all Muslims are potential terrorists, and ridiculous to suggest that the few "bad apples" in the police force are representative of all police. All men are potential rapists though, that's not sexist, it's a basic fact I learned in Gender & Women's Studies 101.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 08:14 PM
1

I'm not the one "changing" the point. The baby has to come out either way, the difference after 24 weeks or so is whether or not we are actively stopping it from being alive when it otherwise could be. It's strange that you are placing the event of birth as a "becoming alive" ritual where a nine-month growth suddenly becomes another human, rather than basing your opinion on actual landmarks of the fetus' own development. Regardless, this conversation is over. I'm providing arguments to back my o…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:53 PM
1

Okay you're missing my point about the 28 weeker and I admit it wasn't clear. My point is that the 28 week old fetus is literally exactly the same organism whether or not it is inside the mother. It is in a different physical location. It is in exactly the same stage of development. The fact that you're defining whether or not it is surrounded by uterus as what makes it a person is what I'm taking issue with.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:55 PM
1

In fact, I'm being very ethical because I'm thinking of the quality of life of the actual people, as they come first. Again your definition of "actual people" is just cold. I work with neonates, I've seen 28 week old babies and babies who were born early because the mother had to be induced.The fact that you don't define this as a person and have a callous disregard for the fact that it could be considered another life is unsettling. How can you draw the line of what constitutes a human life at …
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:12 AM
1

There is a pretty overwhelming consensus that unless there are extenuating circumstances (severe disability for the child, life threatening for the mother, etc) the most ethical and safe cutoff point sits between 16 and 24 weeks, which coincides with the start of when a fetus could potentially survive outside the uterus and thus may be considered a life with value. There is no splitting of hairs. This is not just my opinion, it is is a widely established consensus that this is where the grey are…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:57 PM
1

Abortion has a place - should be available at any time during pregnancy. There's no good reason to not support that that I've come across. So like, even a day before a full-term, healthy child is born, if the mother decides she doesn't want it, instead of being induced at that instant and put up for adoption to live a healthy life raised by a couple who are unable to have children of their own, the fetus should be removed from the uterus and for lack of a better word "destroyed"? When it's a hea…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:33 PM
3

All good points, which I agree with. The only point I was making is that all of my previously listed arguments do exist, so regardless of whether or not they hold any validity you cannot say there is "No dilemma". It is one of the most prominent ethical debates of the current era.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:30 PM
6

That's why I stated twice that I know you are simply referring to the technical definition, and that you were correct. I was just bringing another point to the conversation.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:12 PM
6

Survivability is irrelevant. Just because a person needs life support to survive doesn't make them any less of a human. Uh, there's no dilemma. A fetus has unique human DNA. That's homo sapiens. That DNA is different from both the father and the mother (also, coincidentally, why a sperm isn't a unique human life but a zygote is). So do you classify a fertilised egg as a human? Just because it needs life support to survive doesn't make it any less of a human, right? Just playing devil's advocate …
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:09 PM
12

Technically yes, ethically it's a grey area. Babies can survive born as early as 24 weeks, does that make a two-month-old baby born at 24wks any less alive or less of a human than an unborn 40-weeker? I know you're just referring to the technicality of it and you're right, but when it comes to abortion there is dilemma as to what constitutes a baby, or a human life, etc.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 10:25 PM
24

This is the only scenario in my eyes where the woman's choice should be seen as more important than the man's, because she's the most directly affected. For all other situations surrounding unwanted pregnancies, the choices and options available should be equal for both parties,since both parties are equally responsible for partaking in (un)safe sex. Women have two chances to waive all responsibility for their mistake (abortion or adoption), men should have this option too: if they want to abort…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 10:21 PM
3

This is something which is often overlooked by those obsessed with the virtually useless current notion of privilege. "White privilege" is practically myth compared to two-parent privilege. It's useful to look at things that actually make a difference socially when considering these things, like one's upbringing rather than the colour of one's skin, which SJWs are strangely obsessed with.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:31 PM
8

To be fair, I can't fault the guy for seeing a way to exploit dumbfuckery and make money out of it. The "oppressed" dumbasses will lap this shit up.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 01:29 PM
5

I loved when she bought up the pay gap. It's an established fact that one of the largest factors causing the "pay gap" is that men work much longer hours than women. She's arguing that women should be given a week off every month, while complaining about men already working more hours.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 11:27 PM
8

A few years ago there was a Students' Union website page from some college circulating which had a list of things men might do which can constitute sexual assault, and "Heavy Breathing" was one of them. Eventually they took the page down because it was obviously the stupidest fucking thing ever, and the page was almost exclusively visited by people who just went there to see how ridiculous it was/to complain. If anyone has a mirror bookmarked I could do with a laugh
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:51 PM
5

I thought Canada was largely immune to this bullshit Our current government is literally founded on similar dumbfuckery. Trudeau's cabinet was picked intentionally based on gender and diversity, not merit. Promising a 50% female cabinet was part of his campaign and it helped him add marginal votes with the Hillary Clinton factor. This cancer isn't contained to the US, nor to college campuses. It pervades the fucking governments running our countries and it surely won't stop there. From the artic…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:04 PM
9

This is yet another example of finding a bias by not controlling for a multitude of factors,then attributing the difference to one small factor (username). Did they look at average starting price? Did they look at the reserve prices? Did they look at writing styles, the information ads provided, etc.? Did they look at the genders of the buyers? No. I'd wager the majority of eBay buyers are men and thus the sellers write to include points which tailor specifically to this audience, which naturall…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:06 PM
2

I'm guessing there was an "unable to identify" category which constitutes the missing figures.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:02 PM
1

"Evidence" and "opinion" are interchangeable terms depending on whether or not you agree with it in the mind of a SJW. Either way the burden of proof is in the wrong place here; it's innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. If you're going to make bold, life-changing claims you're responsible for having evidence to back them up.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:51 PM
0

Eh, I suppose this isn't the sub for this, it's just fascinating to me that she can't find a way out of this. Crying rape probably seemed like it'd be an easy way out, it works in the alleged victim's favor most of the time
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:10 PM
131

Even if it was an air-tight study that proved a point adequately, the study itself isn't the point. The point is that if this said "Study proves men write better code", it wouldn't have been published anywhere and there'd be uproar if the BBC had published it.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 04:53 PM
1

I'm just wondering what if anything points this horrible crime of putting up a flyer the 4th Reich I mean feminist that you all simultaneously loathe and fear to the point you it sets everyone off on sexist rants. Was that a sentence?
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:30 PM
25

Personally I don't take issue with what you just described. It's light-hearted gender-based humor that jokes about the differences men and women play in a relationship. We start to sound too much like radfems if we label this a "micro-aggression" and take issue with it. Challenging the actions of a detrimental political movement by mirroring them is not sensible, it's counter-productive.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:08 PM
112

It's the feminist double-whammy. They go around saying "fuck gender roles" while tacking up posters like this, which say "a man's role is to protect women". Honestly this poster is detrimental to both men and women because in suggesting that men are responsible for protecting women, it also suggests that women need paternalistic treatment by surrounding males. Edit: I'm guessing this got linked on SRS or similar because 24hrs later I'm being confronted by people attacking but not in the slightes…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:04 PM
1

Using your cell phone as a voice recorder is a must, obviously
/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:22 PM
16

Every time I hook up with a girl now I make sure I get a text back in the morning with a positive response in case she changes her mind in a few hours. The alternative, and only true way to not rape a girl through the feminist viewpoint, is following this script while fucking a girl: Do you still want this? Yes! Do you still want this? Yes! Do you still want this? Yes! Just be careful not to fall for the age-old trap: Do you still want this? Yes, can you stop fucking saying that though? You've c…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:10 PM
5

Yep, the DOJ Credit to this reddit comment which I had saved, I recommend saving it to have some stats to throw at feminists when they kick off. There's also a pretty good source on other feminist dogma in the sub comments.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 02:05 PM
1

The Ryerson Students’ Union (RSU) rejected a men’s issues group for official status because it was afraid the group would become a campus haven for misogyny and radical anti-feminism. Shutting down any chance of talks which oppose a social/political movement (such as feminism) seems sensible. When do the book burnings start? Arriola’s group did not have enough guarantees in its constitution to prevent it from turning into a violent men’s rights activism (MRA) group, according to a document hande…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:41 PM
3

Out of interest, why identify as a feminist when this type of behavior, which you clearly disagree with, is consistent with modern mainstream feminism? By saying you "Are a feminist, but don't agree with this" is like saying you are a Christian but don't believe in going to church. I'm glad you realize that, within the context of normal society, this is insanity. Within the context of everyday feminism though, this is perfectly normal behavior, and considered a victory for women. This isn't an e…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:56 PM
26

What's their spin on this? How can they possibly reject this while maintaining their equality narrative? Seems consistent with every other feature of feminism to me. They frequently reject anything that aims to help men because the feminist rhetoric hinges on the myth of male privilege providing a red carpet stroll-in-the-park life for every male ever.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:08 AM
14

Agreed. Pretty much every Students' Union is run by toxic feminist harpies, so it's a fairly safe assumption, but an assumption nonetheless. It's sensible to save the F bomb for when it's confirmed rather than pointing the finger right off the bat or they might be triggered. Edit: There's a comment further up with one of the aforementioned harpies calling this a victory for women and student safety etc. on campus, so I'm happy to point the finger now
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:04 AM
2

These people need to understand due process and the concept of "beyond reasonable doubt" as it applies to the law. Rapists are only punished if it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt; similarly, false accusers can only be punished if it is proven beyond reasonable doubt. So the problem of true victims being called liars only arises if we conform to the will of feminists by abandoning due process and innocent until proven guilty. Just another way in which feminism is nothing but destructive for…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:49 PM
1

or claims I didn't state it was a part of feminist theory but if you want an example deep rooted in Feminist theory, their assertions about patriarchy get pretty whacky
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:36 PM
1

Your second comment is vaguely aligning with what I'm saying, and the scientific method; scientists disprove and change their theories according to results, not the other way around. It does not align with your first comment. That means a theory does always work, IF the required preconditions are met. Your assertion in your original comment that a theory is a set-in-stone goal that can never be changed, just has to be worked around until everything else makes sense, is what's incorrect. Like I s…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:14 PM
1

The wage gap myth, for starters
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:03 PM
2

"Science" is a social construct made by the patriarchy to hold down womyn
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:17 AM
1

Of course the theory may fail too, like newtons model in very high speeds and gravitations, but that is usually a huge scientific breakthrough which doens't happen often. So the problem is not theory, but that those using theories don't do their job properly. Theories "fail", as in are proven wrong, all the time. Altering the conditions until the theory stands isn't how science works, it's entirely the other way; every time a theory is tested and refuted, a better theory or explanation is though…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:10 AM
1

Because the testing of feminist ideals involves "social experiments" like manslamming. Most feminist theories or claims are easily debunked or refuted with genuine statistics, so they tend to avoid those.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:02 AM
1

What point exactly are you trying to make? The difference between military/scientific academia and feminist style academia are the presence of experimentation and empirical evidence versus theorycrafting, echo chamber sharing of ideas, a complete lack of hard facts/statistics, and a general lack of awareness about how things actually are. Scientists find out how things are, feminists etc just decide how they think things are. That's the point that's being made here I think, not sure which bit yo…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:59 AM
6

The original post has plenty of reasons why this is a bad idea. Particularly the part about women being treated differently by hostiles and the media. Also it's not like units operate independently at all times, so the issues with mixed gender missions would still occur.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:46 AM
7

Most of them include some threat (Shoplifters will be prosecuted, This store records security footage, etc.); they're not there to hilight the fact that stealing is wrong so it's a false parallel. The feminist rhetoric is "We should teach boys that rape is wrong and they shouldn't rape" - boys and men damn well know rape is wrong, yes even rapists. The assertion that our society condones and dismisses rape is fucking absurd. Rape is quite obviously and clearly considered one of the most evil and…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:27 PM
4

There's also a community on tumblr that endorces and encourages shoplifting That shit isn't just on tumblr. /r/shoplifting
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:19 PM
3

Gosh can we please not call them emotional feminists but normal feminists that are great and batshit crazy woman that have nothing todo woth feminism Unfortunately not, because the behavior described above is pretty routine and welcomed in mainstream feminism. At least online, anyway. As long as you have clear logical arguments, and have constructive criticism, post away. Completely agree with you on this. Feminists are most assuredly welcome here when using rational talk and not emotional logic…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:13 PM
1

Also ITT people thinking this specific post is a problematic example of men being oppressed. We have exactly the same info here as the "75 cents for a dollar" wage gap bullshit goes by; just "man" and "woman" posted by two numbers without context or control for a multitude of factors. Also I'm not sure what this profession is or how many people there are in it but is the difference here even statistically significant without considering the multitude of other not-considered factors?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:25 PM
2

A close family friend is going through the same right now, I wish there was something I could do to help him personally to win custody of his children because their mother is a mentally unstable alcoholic, but I would be entirely unsurprised if the courts give him even 50%-time custody despite the fact that those poor kids shouldn't have to deal with their mother ever again.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 09:47 PM
3

When accounting for all casualties, the rate between men and women is almost certainly similar. It isn't, actually. The vast majority of wartime deaths are combat deaths, not civilian deaths. If you opened it up to include non-combat wartime related deaths, the statistic would still look fairly similar. Also if you opened it up to before the gulf war, including the world wars, it would be even more overwhelmingly more men. The other guy said it right, this stat is primarily useful in dismissing …
/r/MensRights28/12/15 09:42 PM
1

Encourage those with the right idea to speak louder. That's the long term solution. I would say this comes from placing more value on the voices of individuals, and less value on having to join a group to be heard. People with something to say should be able to say it without "S/he agrees with me, therefore must be a feminist/MRA/Islamic extremist, come join and support all our other bullshit!"
/r/MensRights28/12/15 08:25 PM
5

True, but why identify yourself with a political movement unless you want to be perceived as having the same views as it's loudest voices or largest numbers? It just leads to the constant "not all feminists are like that" argument, or "true feminists believe in equality". It doesn't have to be a centralised identity, because that leads to the dogmatic indoctrination and recruitment we see in feminism ("if you believe in equality, you're a feminist"). The MRM can be seen as a centralised movement…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:39 PM
3

Absolutely - kinda what I was getting at with my middle paragraph there. There's definitely many MRAs who are just as bad as feminists, which is why I don't overtly identify as one; I don't want to associate myself with said loons. Much in the same sense, I discourage my socially conscious friends from identifying as feminists just because a few aspects of feminism align with some of their views. You don't have to assign yourself to a certain demographic just because you share some views with th…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:22 PM
125

This comment is a good example of what keeps me coming to /r/mensrights A lot of the time the posts here are identical to some garbage I'd see on /r/feminism and the comments follow in suit, just with "men" in place of the word "women". Whining, women-blaming, demonization of anyone who disagrees, etc. Your comment is a good example of what differentiates the MRM from feminism: actually applying critical thought to something, even though it could otherwise agree with the objective of the movemen…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 03:52 PM
2

meme Bad Luck Brian is a meme This isn't even an image macro, it's an infographic. People are just providing constructive criticism, you'd do well to make some minor changes and repost in comments, as it could be a useful reference. (I'm assuming you made this)
/r/MensRights28/12/15 03:49 PM
8

And that's when you drop the class
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:43 PM
1

I know, I agree. Just stating that it's sadly the truth wherever you go now.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:16 PM
1

Shits spreading.. Fuck
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:20 PM
2

Yep, you're right. Probably careers of men who decide to strategically go away from this university. Implying that any other North American University is any better
/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:23 AM
1

Feminists have diluted the meaning of rape while accusing the rest of society of doing exactly that. Imagine if UC Berkley found him guilty of some other heinous crime like murder and kicked him out despite him being found not guilty by a court of law. It'd be a fucking joke. But somehow when it comes to rape it's OK for kangaroo courts to convict people and punish as they wish.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:39 PM
3

Feminists walk into men on the sidewalk intentionally and video it because they think this somehow proves that men refuse to step aside for women (by refusing to step aside themselves). It's a great illustration of the feminist mentality in general
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:36 PM
2

The sad thing is this could happen to literally any male that sleeps with a female following a social event, all you have to do is piss off the right person. I've pissed off plenty of SJWs and feminists at my University, this could happen to me if I had a perfectly consensual ONS with one...
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:26 PM
15

So sick of hearing about Trudeau's cabinet being half female. So many feminists and SJWs on my Facebook feed praising him for the last couple weeks and I just can't argue with all of them. His idea of gender equality by hiring people based on gender is bonkers. I think he is the best choice for PM but I'm still salty about the gender balanced cabinet.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 07:16 PM
1

These idiots are a loud majority on University campuses now. I'm in my last year and can't fucking wait to get away from these idiots, but the problem is I'm not just jumping a sinking ship; they are dragging the rest of the continent down with them. This bullshit which started on college campuses will infect the rest of society soon enough, it's already started to take hold unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:53 PM
3

Subreddit cancer strikes again
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:52 PM
2

You chose a good topic because it's one of few things considered "controversial" despite having an overwhelming census of evidence proving one side of the debate.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:06 PM
1

Cite both shitty feminist-fuelled "studies" claiming the gap exists, and genuine/reliable literature on the topic. Allocate some time to proving your own point, and some time explaining why the myth exists in the first place and then debunking the garbage sources you used. Back up your debunking with a few "When you account for X, Y and Z, the gap is gone" type articles, and you're done.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:03 PM
2

Men. Obviously. But your link doesn't work :(
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:59 PM
26

This is what rape culture actually is. The normalisation of the word/concept of rape by feminists screaming the word at every blink of an eyelid, likening everything possible to something traditionally considered a violent, heinous crime just to sensationalise the issue. I'm convinced that if we start using "rape culture" in this sense (something made up by feminists which has become a real issue) then the rape culture brigade will jump ship and give up on it.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:01 PM
3

not everything is a femspiracy Sometimes this sub needs reminding of this haha. Also, I said the decision was made by someone more qualified - realistically the decision will have been made by a collection of experts on the subject. That doesn't mean they can't reconsider based on changing budgets or new evidence, nor does it mean they absolutely made the right decisions regarding distribution of this vaccine. My point is that it's not just some guy saying "Men don't need this expensive BS", it'…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:04 PM
4

On an individual basis yes, the $300 vaccine is cheap compared to cancer treatment. However on a population-wide basis this may not be the case. Say 1 in 100 people get an HPV-related cancer (a high figure, more likely many times less than this). The cost analysis becomes "Is the 1 persons's cancer treatment more expensive than the $30,000 we spent vaccinating 100 people to prevent that 1 person's cancer?"
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:59 PM
6

HPV can cause head neck and throat cancer in males. The vaccine would help protect men against this, as well as protecting more girls by improving herd immunity. For the record, it's OK to change your mind based on new information!
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:18 AM
3

It's a cost efficiency thing for sure, we definitely have the tools. I'm split on this dilemma because on the one hand it is an extremely expensive vaccine and clearly someone more qualified to decide than me has said "It's not cost effective to vaccinate boys too". In a public health care system, the money saved on this is back into the pot for something else, so cost efficiency is important. With that said, I would really like to see boys vaccinated. Vaccinating boys will protect more girls fr…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:13 AM
13

I have my own theory on rape culture. It exists, but it's not the normalisation of rape by jokes and social acceptance like feminists make it out to be; it's the normalisation of rape by constant over usage, dilution of the word, and shifting of the goalposts such that rape statistics will always be increasing and the word "rape" will always be thrown around more because the use and definition of the word just becomes broader and broader. Feminists are the ones normalising the otherwise abhorred…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:52 PM
3

BUT I SAW A JOKE ABOUT ROOFIES IN A MOVIE, CAN'T YOU SEE WE LIVE IN A RAPE CULTURE
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:26 PM
15

You forgot the ending, where she exacts her petty revenge. She accuses him of rape, gets him kicked out of University and ruins all his career and education prospects forever, all while society just watches.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:24 PM
9

SHE'S NOT A REAL FEMINIST
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/15 01:22 PM
4

True, she's still a vile fucking witch though
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:57 PM
1

In a perfect world, perhaps
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:38 AM
1

They are, but this isn't an example of that. The article doesn't mention gender, and it doesn't need to, because that's not what it's about.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:28 PM
3

Would love to have seen more/hear the outcome
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/15 06:47 PM
2

Reminds me of the uproar that ensued when GTAV was released. All my female middle aged Facebook friends were in uproar when they heard you can kill prostitutes in the game because it encourages violence against women... nobody bats an eyelid that the actual storyline requires you to kill males constantly in every GTA game. It's laughable how normalized violence against men is in our culture, and yet feminists assert that it is a "rape culture" which normalizes violence against woman. Nutters.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:58 PM
6

Ruthless
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/15 04:25 PM
1

I'm sure they have considered it and thrown the idea out the window just because it's completely impractical. Most universities do not offer male only residence because it would just be so unpopular.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:36 AM
1

It honestly might be more of a demand thing than a "discrimination" thing here. BUT ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SEXES MEANS INEQUITY, OPPRESSION AND DISCRIMINATION. Didn't you know? We're just the male equivalent of feminists here now.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:34 AM
0

Feminists* use the term survivor. It's just one of many ways they sensationalize shit. Let's not sink to their level.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:29 AM
-6

It is, but it's a term coined and thrown around by feminists to sensationalize the issue of rape. You don't see victims of other crimes which aren't likely to result in death calling themselves "survivors"; if I've been jumped and had money taken from me, I'm not a "mugging survivor", because that would be fucking ridiculous. This sub generally dislikes feminists because of the way they sensationalize shit and demonize men. Some stuff I see here is just as bad, now to the point of even copying f…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:26 AM
2

But competition is a derogatory masculine trait, encouraged by the patriarchy to hurt the oppressed and favor privileged white males /s
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:38 AM
2

The sweet thing about all of this is that ultimately being short or tall isn't a choice and doesn't lead to health problems, being fat IS at least mostly a choice and will lead to a shitty and shorter life down the road. As a nurse she should know that...
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/15 11:36 PM
1

they ought to proofreading it You're right, but I can't help but point out the irony in this not-proofread statement haha
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:04 PM
0

They're clearly in no way linked or comparable statistics. The only comparisons made here are for comparing incidences in men vs incidences in women for the various categories presented.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:02 PM
9

There is a difference between genuine failed suicide attempts and "cries for help" though, these are generally much higher in women.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:00 PM
154

cake sale against women combat deaths at 11:00pm lets end injustice Cakes for women: $0.03 Cakes for men: $0.97
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:13 PM
29

It's not really providing a comparison, just highlighting a few of the areas in which women are more privileged than men. It's a quick-and-dirty refutation to the feminist assertion that male privilege lays down a red carpet to make life easy for men while they trample all over women.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:52 PM
2

Exactly. The vast majority of women aren't absolute cunts like this one, but you should be careful. When you have sex with a woman or even talk about her behind her back*, you are giving her the chance to completely fuck up your life if she wants. *see: Dalhousie Dentistry Facebook Group "Scandal"
/r/MensRights02/04/15 10:04 PM
-1

Yeah, the video was funny but I couldn't tell if the guy had put on his quirky outfit and ?wig/strange hairstyle as some kind of intentional joke to make a point of not being taken seriously, or if he genuinely just doesn't look like somebody who could possibly be seriously anyway.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:06 PM
27

I think it's addressed towards feminists, who are used to infantilizing themselves and their gender, so it fits the target audience
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:46 PM
6

Many of the viewers of this video will be tied to Universities though. Just because it wasn't put out by one doesn't dismiss its message.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:44 PM
9

People without much going for them are more likely to make the fundamental attribution error that founds feminism. "Everything bad that happens to me/my sex is someone else's fault".
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/15 01:34 PM
2

Thanks, as soon as I got into the video I realized they would absolutely bastardize what she'd said and likely present it completely out of context. Looked to the comments to see if I could get the actual scoop.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:22 PM
20

Yeah WTF. That's probably based on 3 years earnings missed or whatever, where's the fucking millions of dollars for time of life missed and the public shame...
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/15 09:35 PM
11

He knows
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:15 PM
5

I wish feminists would allow themselves to be exposed to/confronted by comments such as this. It makes for such a perfect description of their dogmatic movement, and yet ironically the statement itself describes why such exposure will and can never really happen. The people who need to read your comment have already fallen victim to the sad phenomenon it describes; you simply aren't allowed to be the dissenting voice in a feminist-dominated conversation or you're "part of the problem".
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:47 AM
2

Couldn't agree more. Seems to be the way increasingly on University campuses across North America actually, and whilst it can bring some constructive elements, ultimately my opinion is that it is degrading many positive aspects of University culture. It certainly has the potential to, as demonstrated here.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:41 AM
6

Dal's had more than its fair share of similar idiocy in recent times, though
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:01 AM
5

I second this, I haven't seen a shift towards negative percetion of feminism this year; I've seen the opposite. Feminism has taken hold of many institutions (particularly colleges) to a point where political correctness has swung far across to the wrong side of what's actually "correct"; now to even question feminism or claims of misogyny/rape/etc. is seen as wrong and sexist. You can no longer publicly refute feminist dogma without being seen as "part of the problem", not just by the nutters bu…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:09 PM
30

Moreover the author quotes FBI stats that between 2-8% of accusations are false. I wouldn't call that "exceedingly rare", I would actually call that "alarmingly frequent". Also, the idea that the worst that would happen is losing a few facebook friends is sickeningly inaccurate. Men have had their lives destroyed by rape allegations which were later found to be false. Innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of law in civilized countries, and to challenge it is wrong in so many ways.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:32 AM
1

It's done to intentionally sensationalize the issue. The fact that it is done nowhere outside of feminism demonstrates this. 9/11 was a pretty traumatic and life-altering situation for many people worldwide, in fact we're all 9/11 survivors, but we don't all call ourselves that.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:40 PM
1

You're right, I should have said robbery survivor.. I was unaware of the technical distinction between the two.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:24 AM
54

I hate the fact that the rape culture brigade is obsessed with using the term "rape survivor" to sensationalize the tone of the issue. Sure some rape victims are murdered, which is awful, but so are victims of burglary, mugging, assault, etc. (crimes men are more commonly victims of). I've had money stolen from me before, I don't go around calling myself a fucking "theft survivor".
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:17 AM
3

Upvote for eloquent use of the word "bint". (Also you did a good job of making a good point.)
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:31 AM
4

The insane thing is that the "SJW" world IS now the "PC" world. A subculture has developed whereby a group of people can say they are "offended" by something and consequentially it means they are right; anything along the same lines of "offensiveness" must then be censored and quelled because it's sexist/racist/etc. Political correctness, in my mind, should mean truthfully speaking one's mind on an issue in plain language, not dancing around the point and saying things in a warped way to avoid o…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:24 AM
2

Whilst I agree that pulling the "my grandparents ___" is reminiscent of the intolerable feminist victim concept, you're missing the entire point of the article. He explicitly acknowledges that he is "privileged" based on the successes of his family before him. The intent of the article is that it's not just because he's a white male, which he conveys well.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter