TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Taxus_Calyx Archive

View 53 posts and 917 comments by Taxus_Calyx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
455

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:11 AM
147

GeneralTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:38 PM
135

Employee, not GoogleTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:57 PM
123

ProgressTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:19 PM
87

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:55 PM
84

Legal RightsTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:54 PM
84

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:44 PM
83

IntactivismTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:01 PM
70

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:59 PM
58

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:54 PM
45

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:02 AM
43

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:15 AM
39

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:27 PM
38

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:08 AM
38

Edu./Occu.Taxus_Calyx/r/MensRights19/07/17 11:49 PM
36

Activism/SupportTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:32 PM
34

Marriage/ChildrenTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights09/01/18 02:44 AM
34

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:23 PM
33

Edu./Occu.Taxus_Calyx/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:04 AM
32

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:51 AM
31

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights23/05/17 07:18 PM
27

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:14 PM
26

Legal RightsTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:59 PM
24

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:26 AM
23

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:23 AM
23

Legal RightsTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:28 PM
23

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:02 AM
22

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights15/09/17 05:29 AM
19

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights29/05/17 04:48 PM
18

Legal RightsTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:53 AM
18

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:24 AM
16

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:10 PM
14

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:14 AM
14

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:04 PM
14

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:58 AM
14

Penis PhotosTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:11 AM
14

FeminismTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:06 PM
13

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:22 AM
13

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights24/02/18 02:32 PM
11

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:17 PM
10

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:45 AM
10

FeminismTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:10 PM
9

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights23/07/17 09:32 AM
8

HumourTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:52 PM
7

Activism/SupportTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:00 PM
6

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:35 PM
6

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:38 PM
6

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:50 AM
1

Taxus_Calyx/r/MensRights25/02/19 06:58 PM
1

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:02 PM
0

Taxus_Calyx/r/MensRights17/07/18 08:17 AM
0

DiscriminationTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:55 PM
0

Social IssuesTaxus_Calyx/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Right and left are the establishment's tools for division. "However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion." ~George Washington
/r/MensRights08/03/24 08:52 PM
2

You don't know who you're talking too, kid. But, congratulations on being self centered, I guess? Also, you're really coming off as a sock puppet, here to sabotage this sub's image.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 09:43 PM
1

Men are "physically superior" is such a stupid and inflammatory thing to say. The truth is closer to "on average men's physical strength is greater".
/r/MensRights05/03/24 07:15 PM
-8

I'm all about men's rights, but my wife is a "western woman" and she rocks, so does our daughter.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 04:10 AM
24

Boy-torture-o-matic
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:34 AM
11

r/FeMRADebates is pretty good.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:48 AM
33

When you watch a movie, try counting the times men are tortured and/or killed and compare it to the women. On second thought don't. It's both depressing and telling how "equal representation" is not important to feminism in certain cases. Why can't we all just think of each other as humans?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:49 PM
9

How about spending your entire life having had your genitals mutilated without your consent in a society that makes jokes about circumcision and foreskins. Imagine having that little authority over your body.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:54 PM
103

They're not "children". They're boys. So no one cares. If this were 9 little girls, the entire developed world, plus twitter, facebook, and reddit would all be in a raging uproar.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 05:54 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 12:53 AM
-4

Other machines.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 01:53 AM
10

I'm sorry (and not sorry in a way) to point out, war machines are less and less in need of "men". We're well into the era of automated warfare.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 06:19 PM
176

And don't forget, according to the ideologues, the reason we men have a higher suicide rate is just that we "don't cry enough" and "don't reach out". The real reason is that, compared to the other 50% of the world's population, no one in the developed world gives a fuck about boys and men.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:42 PM
31

Just checked out that sub and the first post I read almost made me cry. Joined.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:35 AM
3

100% needless deaths of innocent children who could not consent to an unnecessary procedure.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 06:18 AM
155

The world's response to your question: 🦗🦗
/r/MensRights31/12/20 07:34 PM
8

Most of us here are not misogynists. There are also more than a few women here. And most of the posts by gay/bi/trans men I've seen here over the last few years have had pretty supportive responses. I hope you have a similar experience and it helps you in your life. But if you're coming here just because you've already made up your mind about all of us as a whole, and you just want to be antagonistic, then you should reconsider. There is more to be gained from a sincere conversation than concern…
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:48 PM
16

Patriarchy, internalized misogyny, toxic-masculinity, orange man.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 01:44 AM
6

That is the most fucked up thing I have read in a long time. This would make a blockbuster suspense thriller film. For the sake of the children, I hope this man is reunited with his family and I hope this woman is extradited from China and she and her conspirators are brought to justice.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 07:10 AM
18

And never be able to see the child.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 12:51 AM
6

I always felt like there was a spark of good at her core and I could help her get over her issues. I made a lot of excuses for her to my family.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:37 PM
17

I feel the same when someone is hurt or ill. I immediately go into EMT/caregiver mode. She also used to complain that I hadn't enough empathy and that I should try to follow her example and be more in touch with my feminine side. She also physically abused me on numerous occasions, bites, kicks, punches, slamming a glass door in my face. The thing I still don't quite get is why I stayed so long.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:25 PM
36

I was so sick one time that I passed out on the toilet. I woke up on the floor to my feminist girlfriend standing over my naked body, yelling at me because I had scared her in the other room, then she slammed the bathroom door and I took care of my self. Later, she came up with the solution of putting me in one of the guest houses until I recovered. That guest house had no toilet. I'll never date a feminist again.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:18 PM
2

Don't get discouraged by people here obsessing over your use of the word "feminist". Good on you for speaking out. Thanks for your intent to help those whose voices are silenced through bigotry, stigma, misandry. Paglia and Fiamenco also consider themselves feminists and they are both true allies of the cause for humane treatment of men and boys.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 12:47 AM
4

There's really only one. The right to show our nipples in public.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:31 AM
3

Meanwhile, they’re allowed to snuff out our offspring as they gestate without so much as a word, and be praised for it as “strong and brave”.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 05:24 PM
6

Try roofing, concrete, or logging. Or identify as a woman.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:19 AM
1

We're talking about evolutionary-psychology, not social constructs.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:53 PM
1

I guess we might be able to genetically engineer the biological biases out of people in the next hundred years, otherwise it will be more like a 10,000 years. Just facts.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:42 PM
60

Imagine: #NoMoreBeefCurtains
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:17 PM
1

You're as bigoted as a feminist. Kindly fuck right off.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:24 PM
1

This kind of reminds me of my first reddit post where I highlighted the hypocrisy of most SJW/Feminists types, who some how maintain the following outlook: In the US, black people are 8 times more likely to be convicted of murder than whites. This is due to white privilege, discrimination, and systematic oppression of black people. It is our responsibility to ensure that white people are educated about their own unfair advantages, and their own racist nature, and to put social programs and laws …
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:51 AM
16

This guy should be Batman in the next movie.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:04 AM
38

Might be half blind by the time you're 50 from lack of UV protection. Cheap sunglasses just don't cut it in the long run :/
/r/TheRedPill18/08/19 05:33 PM
4

Feminists are just going to pretend like abolishing selective service is one of their goals, while not really putting much money or energy into it. Meanwhile, they'll say, "See, we believe the draft is wrong, and two wrongs don't make a right, so if you want women to register for selective service, then you're a misogynist!"
/r/MensRights09/08/19 12:18 AM
3

If you think this is funny, you're part of the problem.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:20 PM
3

We need more subs like this but with better standards. Before this one is completely overrun by black propaganda sock puppets trying to make all of us egalitarians look like misogynists.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 12:00 AM
7

Doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:53 PM
29

https://canadiancrc.com/Infanticide_Canada-Position_Statement_Canadian_Childrens_Rights_Council_and_UN.aspx
/r/MensRights04/08/19 11:51 PM
1

No, fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:50 PM
13

Get out of here with this stupid shit. Wrong sub.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 05:53 AM
1

So..misanthrope confirmed 🤮
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 01:29 AM
1

Hmm. You're either racist, or a misanthrope, or exaggerating. The answer is in how many billions are you talking about? Or are you using 'billions' figuratively?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 12:50 AM
7

So many comments on that post that really just reveal how much people are just itching to psychologically traumatize boys.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:01 PM
2

Yes, but by then they'll be women.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:37 AM
1

At a seafood joint, dipshit.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 04:04 AM
2

Talking about it first doesn't change anything. She can promise you beforehand that she'll keep it and she'll still have the right to kill your unborn child.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:32 AM
1

Bullshit. Women also tell men to 'man up' and 'grow a pair'. It's not toxic masculinity, it's just people being assholes.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:31 PM
1

You're in La La Land.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:18 PM
3

You are incorrect. Most of the key reasons men's rights are violated are misandry and female-centric thinking.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:48 PM
11

Exactly. The whole concept of "toxic masculinity" is just another tool for the feminist ideology to make men accountable for all social ills, while exonerating women.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:17 PM
5

There is no toxic femininity or toxic masculinity. Period. These are harmful social constructs.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:14 PM
7

There is no toxic masculinity. There is no toxic femininity. There are some toxic people. That's it.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:31 PM
20

Exactly.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:34 PM
38

Because there is zero public conversation about "toxic femininity", which, if any gendered "toxicities" exist at all, is at least as much to blame for this problem as "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:34 PM
49

Except for "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:15 PM
4

Just needs the pockets hanging down and big phone in the back pocket with a phone cover with sparkly cherries on it 🍒.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:13 PM
1

r/TheRedpill is not that bad. Like here, there are a few bigots, other than that, it's just men trying to cope with the new rules of the sexual marketplace. What's so bad about a few guys getting laid?
/r/MensRights17/06/19 08:52 AM
17

Interesting point. At least it's definitely male though. Next year they should do an ostrich. He raises up to 40 babies on his own at once from various deadbeat moms.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:43 PM
8

Kind of pathetic, really.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:41 PM
2

"Jumbo shrimp"
/r/MensRights03/06/19 01:02 PM
1

The fact is, women are just more fearful.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:14 PM
15

Wait, so physical threatening on national television is okay, but calling a man a man is evil? Welcome to Bizarro Dystopia.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:58 PM
2

What happened to this place?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 03:33 AM
5

AOC +1
/r/MensRights11/05/19 03:00 AM
12

What a dishonest question. This sub doesn't hate anything. Some people who frequent this sub advocate for humans of all genders to have the right to choose, after the age of consent, whether they want to have pieces of their genitals mutilated or altered in any way. It would be almost as dishonest a question if I were to ask you, "Why do you hate baby boys?"
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:34 PM
13

Feminists will publish widely applauded op-ed articles illustrating that this demonstrates "toxic masculinity" 🙄
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:26 AM
5

Concern troll.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:49 PM
5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:18 AM
5

Boys are shamed at birth when part of their genitals are sacrificed to the female imperative.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:09 PM
59

Heckin good dad boi
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:52 AM
1

Baloney.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:15 PM
2

Thanks, great term.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:34 AM
4

I believe there is some merit to what you're saying, for sure.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 04:32 AM
7

It's not about Tinder users lying. Its about encouraging a culture that dehumanizes short men, when height means nothing about a person. Whereas being overweight, unless due to an unpreventable disease, is an indication of poor choices and poor self care, things that actually mean something in relationships.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:23 AM
10

Think about the context. It is mostly men who drive Tinder's profits, and yet they chose not to prank women with a weight verification, only men with a height verification. My post is not really about the Tinder April Fool's prank as much as it's about the overall misandry in our cultural climate we're in now. This prank is just a tiny slice of the same old misandrist pie that is our current culture, served up a new way, just like the Gillette ad.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:59 AM
2

I can also appreciate this sentiment to some degree. Thanks for your input.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 01:58 AM
6

I'm referring to the quarantine of r/TheRedPill. I think there is a concerted effort to get us quarantined too.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 11:33 PM
3

I think it started with the quarantines.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 11:22 PM
11

As I said, to those who visit this sub in good faith, thank you, keep it up, and don't lose hope.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 10:58 PM
14

Hello. I was referring to this: https://www.themarysue.com/tinder-april-fools-joke-men/ Please explain the reasoning, if any, behind your theory that me commenting on this issue precludes me from being humane.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 10:26 PM
14

Special thanks to the actual activists, I realize that just swaying the hearts and minds of the people in our own circles is not the only reward to our struggle. Probably the more important rewards are the ones gained by actual researchers, analysts, activists, lobbyists, etc. Thanks to everyone working toward a more humane humanity.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:52 PM
2

You need to make titles that say something about the content of your post.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 08:30 PM
5

Priceless.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 02:56 PM
22

It came out on March 29. You're slow on the uptake.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 02:48 PM
16

This is the part where they belittle you for being fragile, a gamer, a neckbeard, a misogynist, a NEET, and for "overthinking". Even if you are literally actually NONE of those things.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 09:16 PM
8

"There’s a negative stereotype about African American men not being fathers to their children and a myth that most black people come from single-parent households,” Hayer said. You can remove "African American" from this and it will be just as true. Still, this is a heartwarming story. More stories like this in the media would be good for men
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:23 PM
1

A radiologist is not a "doctor".
/r/MensRights10/03/19 04:23 PM
2

Men can exhibit all of those bad behaviors too. Let's not stoop to the level of male and female misandrists.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:17 AM
6

Looks like he literally just got banned from twitter "for using free speech". So what does he do? Comes directly to a subreddit dedicated to equal rights for men, to degrade men for wanting the right to bodily autonomy. Classy.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:09 AM
1

Such a defeatist attitude lends no contribution in improving the rights of men or anyone else. If you're only into complaining for it's own sake, I got no time.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:36 PM
1

Tell us more, wise one.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:28 PM
1

I'm a dude. Are you stupid?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:44 PM
1

Eye guess there would be one guy left who could see at the end. Luckily not everyone sees the way you do.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:28 PM
1

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:49 PM
4

Bless her heart. I couldn't take it.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:43 PM
4

What a horrible outlook.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:34 PM
8

Haven't you heard? All boys are future trash 🙄
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:51 AM
3

There's always r/TheRedPill
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:30 PM
4

Wrong sub. Try r/dating_advice .
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:07 PM
7

*inexplicably
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:34 PM
15

It's not that we've been taught not to show our emotions. It's that no-one gives a fuck about our emotional pain.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:28 PM
22

If you want men to have equal rights with women, regardless of their sexuality, race, or beliefs, or mental state, then this sub is for you. There is no gatekeeping here.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 03:07 AM
11

Your assessment of the hierarchy of empathy seems more or less accurate.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:03 PM
17

Are little boys less human than kittens and puppies? Also, to be clear, I agree that tail docking and ear cropping are unnecessarily cruel.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:01 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 10:49 AM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:48 AM
1

Your comments show that you are aggressively in denial of the fact that your post is actually a passive attempt to force all men into certain behaviors or risk being deprived of their manhood or social status. This is a sub for discussing men's rights issues, not for sharing ideas on how to pressure men into certain behaviors via shaming them as less than "a good man".
/r/MensRights23/02/19 12:59 AM
2

If you want to know how civilized a culture is, look at how they treat men, women, children, and the elderly.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 07:40 PM
13

In other words, "Yes" to both of the OP's questions.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:50 AM
6

Perhaps it's the fact that the title of the article is blatantly sexist.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:30 PM
1

Men don't even exist.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 05:06 AM
10

Unless he buys Gillette razors.
/r/becomeaman17/01/19 05:22 AM
33

This is great. I see zero upvotes after an hour. Must be lot of brigaders right now who really don't want anyone to know that men are good.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:04 AM
3

This is good.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 06:34 AM
7

I asked for the unmarked restroom to be unlocked so I could relieve my bladder and later made a verbal complaint to the manager on duty. Thinking about making a written complaint. Edit: It is now 4 months later. I never made a written complaint and the restrooms are still the same. Interesting.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 08:25 PM
14

The newly remodeled location in Lihue on Kauai.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 08:58 AM
7

Wtf? Google maps? This is the new McDonalds in downtown Lihue. It's been recently remodeled. Would that affect the accuracy of your Google maps?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 08:41 AM
152

The restroom on the left is locked and not marked for men, but men can access it with permission by having an employee unlock it. The room on the right is unlocked and marked for women. How is this legal? Edit: This is in downtown Lihue, on the island of Kauai.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:12 AM
0

r/HelicopterRights
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:54 PM
2

Serious counter question: Isn’t it possible for a procedure to not be abuse, the recording of which also exposes body parts that are illegal to expose in media?
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:59 PM
5

That’s funny, but seriously.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:35 PM
3

Wait, would it be just as easy to claim injustice if they had not blurred it out? Boys deserve protection from child pornography as much as girls.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 02:22 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_are_wonderful_effect
/r/askTRP01/11/18 01:35 PM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_are_wonderful_effect
/r/TheRedPill07/10/18 07:35 PM
27

Also, no one would ever exonerate a 29 year old man for fucking a 14 year old girl just because he “looks so young”.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:40 PM
13

This comment should be at the top, so we aren’t spreading misinformation among ourselves.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:27 PM
95

Be safe out there, boys. We all know the stats for workplace deaths.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 05:28 AM
5

A man in a room full of women had likely better keep his mouth shut or be good looking. A woman in a room full of men will likely have all the power and attention, even if she's mediocre looking.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:38 PM
1

The missing last frame of this comic shows that bitch getting body slammed unconscious.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:35 PM
4

r/titleporn
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:52 AM
0

It’s good to put current events into perspective by considering how history has led us to where we are. Best not to repeat the faults of the past, even if the roles are reversed.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 12:11 AM
-1

Very few, as compared to the many generations that went before in which men were not systematically deprioritized academically in favor of women in Western culture (the very culture which the US is currently at the forefront of).
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:32 PM
1

The topic at hand is bigger than the US. Many countries worldwide are holding men back academically. This is a recent development in the history of education worldwide.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:28 PM
1

Yup, you’re the idiot, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Bologna Also, never said anything about italy being in the US did I? Nope, that was you. Yup, again, you’re the idiot.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:16 PM
-3

Implying that it’s recent.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:13 PM
0

No. Edit: If you care to know what I’m actually saying, it’s that feminism has overcorrected and that,recently (since the 1980’s), men have been systematically held back academically, and not just in the USA.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 07:12 PM
-3

You’re an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:12 PM
-12

Italy, Genius.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:10 PM
-19

That’s pretty recent considering the first universities were started about a thousand years ago.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:34 PM
10

“Journalism”
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:42 PM
100

Well, you’re a man aren’t you?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 04:55 PM
1

All adult males do grow at least some hair on their necks.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:44 PM
2

The Amanda Sheetz case https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/local/2018/07/03/suit-alleges-daily-visits-niangua-nurse-and-teen-she-had-sex/754867002/
/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:03 PM
3

They didn’t even add “Percentage of women who think it’s wrong to comment on a man’s physical appearance.” to their survey questions. I wonder why. What a one sides census. Mainstream gynocentrism at its finest. Only thing that tops that is maybe the fact that my iPhone doesn’t even recognize gynocentrism as a word right now. But we have accepted chauvinism as reality long ago. Sigh. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_are_wonderful_effect
/r/MensRights10/07/18 05:37 PM
1

They didn’t even add “Percentage of women who think it’s wrong to comment on a man’s physical appearance.” to their survey questions. I wonder why. What a one sides census. Mainstream gynocentrism at its finest. Only thing that tops that is maybe the fact that my iPhone doesn’t even recognize gynocentrism as a word right now. But we have accepted chauvinism as reality long ago. Sigh. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_are_wonderful_effect
/r/MensRights10/07/18 05:36 PM
368

Wow. Swapping genders on this one is a real eye opener.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 11:58 PM
3

You need to work on your reading skills. Here, let’s try again. Grizzlies and polar bears do not produce FERTILE offspring, Therefore they are separate species. All races of humans can procreate with one another and produce FERTILE offspring, therefore they are one species. Analogy is still shit. Edit: I stand corrected. Sorry. I still think a better analogy would be chicken breeds or something.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 09:36 PM
3

Shitty analogy. Polar bears, black bears, and grizzly bears are all different species, meaning they cannot breed with one another to produce fertile offspring. Blacks, hispanics, and whites are all one species. Edit: I stand corrected. Sorry. I still think a better analogy would be chicken breeds or something.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 08:23 PM
7

Would a man with comparable low IQ and mental impairment be spared for raping two separate women?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:38 PM
3

Cerebral palsy doesn’t affect cognitive ability. It affects muscle control.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 05:38 PM
3

Cerebral palsy is not a mental disorder. It affects your muscle control, not your cognitive ability.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 05:37 PM
5

Wow. Almost sorry I asked. It’s like wading through a swamp full of sticky hangover shits.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 07:34 PM
5

Anyone have a subscription so you can tell us what the comments are like for that article?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 05:51 PM
2

Oh I see. I misunderstood.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:15 PM
4

Good observation. Could he have been covering up emotions that were there all along to satisfy expectations placed on him to be stoic and immovable?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:05 PM
0

But suicide is not Karma coming around, it’s throwing out more.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:02 PM
88

Do the dirty work. Take the blame. Suck it up. Fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:00 PM
10

Name me one bar that sends your 10 reasons joke along with e-receipts. You can’t, because they would be put out business. That’s the point.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:35 AM
3

You forgot dull.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:18 PM
28

Now they need whiskey scent.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 09:01 PM
6

oh
/r/MensRights26/05/18 07:59 PM
4

wut?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 06:04 PM
3

Bad bot.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:32 PM
2

Umm, you left out alcohol, tobacco, and a shit ton of drugs.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/18 06:32 AM
11

I’ve had a similar thing happen a few years ago. I happened to see the same woman twice in two shops in the same day at the mall. I was looking at some items right next to her and asked her a question about one of the items we were looking at. I would have done the exact same thing even if it was a dude. She immediately starts yelling, “Don’t talk to me! And stop following me!” I was flabbergasted. Dumbfounded. After the initial shock of being wrongly accused, I thought to myself, “Bitch, I don’…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:54 PM
1

Have you heard of IBM’s Watson? What about Boston Dynamics? One thing I can assure you of, the next 30 years will be unlike anything you’ve ever imagined.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 05:09 PM
2

The article doesn’t really say that. Also, naturally, both men and women are “tools” of society pretty much by definition.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 11:36 PM
3

From the article: “David G. Gilmore writes that, ‘So long as there are battles to be fought, wars to be won, heights to be scaled, hard work to be done, some of us will have to act like men.’ Yet the challenges of modern societies for most people are often very different from those that occurred throughout much of our history.” Maybe part of the reason modern society is becoming so hostile toward men and masculinity is that, due to globalization, and our rapidly developing technology, we are get…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 05:13 PM
1

What’s LCF and why isn’t it in the glossary?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/18 05:44 PM
5

The best comment: “I would imagine that if a man published a list of ‘the top 20 campus sluts’ by name and included little vignettes on why they were on the list that man would (rightfully) be expelled. While being known as a slut isn’t great it would seem hard to argue it is a more damaging label than ‘rapist.’ Surely then a letter in this hypothetical man’s record is the very most Midd could now punish him without engaging in blatant hypocrisy. Seems a bizarre and sad result. Both Dunn and the…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 05:30 AM
8

From a separate article: “Police believe that Perez tried to keep him from getting out, as they said that boards were set up at every window and that Perez had asked neighbors to help her switch locks. The locks worked from the outside instead of the inside. “
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:26 PM
5

Wow, reading that just made me relive my childhood. Excellent study. Unfortunate findings.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:13 PM
1

I looked through those articles, and many others. So far, I’m not finding any articles that say she wounded her boyfriend. Also, nothing about domestic abuse. I’ll keep searching though.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:05 PM
2

Very interesting. Please provide sources for this angle.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:50 AM
11

This^
/r/MensRights05/04/18 01:02 AM
3

Visit r/Feminism if you want to feel what it’s like to exist in a fascist space where wrongthink is quickly censored. If r/Feminism was a country, there would be innocent men lying dead on every street.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:22 PM
1

Everything except for the state sponsored part, and infancy part, and the pox part.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:18 PM
5

It’s like a bunch of racists showing up at r/blackpeopletwitter to defend their positions on “the problem with blacks” by saying “Oh no, you’re misunderstanding the term. We aren’t saying all blacks are a problem, just that some people are a problem and some of them are black.”
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:16 PM
27

What’s up with all the feminist apologists reaching the top comments on this post? Are we actually going to pretend that mainstream modern society isn’t trying to force feed us a narrative of ALL MASCULINITY being inherently toxic? In r/MensRights of all places? Must be because the title is “Toxic Masculinity” so it’s attracting a bunch of feminists sympathizers.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:32 AM
1

Enjoy your denial.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:45 PM
1

And she always wears a hat with all her hair up inside in public because she hates for people to notice her crazy hair color.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 04:24 PM
5

Sounds more like stating the sad facts.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:12 AM
23

Yes.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:52 AM
3

They’r feminists. Of course their shit doesn’t stink.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:42 PM
17

They should follow their own rules, but that would require pulling their heads out of their kangaroo asses.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:42 PM
2

That’s not what this article is about.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:38 PM
8

Yeah, one time I was kissing a woman and she just put her hand on my dick without asking. I WAS RAPED! She should be in jail.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:55 PM
15

Comics are dead. For the moment. SJW’s infect every corner of culture and politics with their feeble-minded bigotry.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:51 PM
66

Come to America ;)
/r/MensRights03/03/18 07:50 AM
2

Firzt tjing I do wehn I biy a nuw pjone is tirn off auttocorect. Exit: speeling.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 06:01 PM
5

Unless you're referring to the hip hop artist, I think you mean 'ludicrous'.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:59 PM
1

Straw man argument.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:46 PM
1

A. She's my friend since childhood, despite our differing beliefs. B. That wouldn't solve anything. C. Two wrongs don't make a right. D. Don't be an asshole. E. You're reinforcing negative stereotypes about MRA's.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:08 AM
1

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:31 PM
1

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:27 PM
3

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:29 PM
3

Men have the same food options as women.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:37 PM
2

Men have the same food options as women.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:37 PM
2

Yep, sock puppet. Men have the same food options as women, obviously.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:14 PM
0

Did some sock puppet troll post this so they could point at it and laugh in r/againstmensrights?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:17 AM
2

I stopped it at "my brick and your face". This adds nothing of value to the cause for men's rights. If anything it serves only to reenforce the misperception that we are all misogynists.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:08 AM
4

I think we're being trolled.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:55 AM
3

Yep, he's an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:52 AM
12

No sympathy for dudes doing something like this (As it should be). Only cries of "Cut off his balls!" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:29 AM
8

Its okay, Facebook will fix everything with good old, wholesome censorship.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 05:27 PM
4

Here's the answer: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:51 PM
1

Why are we all accepting this all of a sudden? I thought this was the whole problem?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:48 PM
5

Cry some more, murderer!
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:40 PM
0

How to be a man: Step 1- Be born male. Step 2- Grow to adulthood.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:39 PM
1

Quit indeed.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:36 AM
1

When it does, it will be celebrated because it will be all about trans 'boys'. Kinda like how they celebrated "more support for men" when the support came in the form of free tampons in the men's room for trans 'men'.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:07 PM
14

No. They're making the argument that men are evil and women are wonderful. And they're tacking on a claim at the end that guns should not be easy to access.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:03 PM
4

I see no outrage.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 04:42 PM
13

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:22 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:21 AM
1

TITS AND ASS
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:20 AM
5

Robots.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:59 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:11 AM
2

Good points. Still, I am of the opinion, and you by no means have to share it, that in order to move forward in a healthy way in the coming techno-centric future, we will indeed be needing to edit our genes (voluntarily of course) to enhance and improve human behavior in a way that compliments our rapidly changing environment and culture.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:23 AM
3

One could argue that all societies consist of a ratio of matriarchy and patriarchy. In the case of western culture, one could say that the matriarchy has become covert, claiming that it does not exist, all the while growing in power as it blames every societal problem on the ever shrinking, emasculated patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:41 PM
11

Unfortunately, I think it's in our genes. Men may always be second class citizens, unless and until we actually alter human behavior through gene editing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:51 PM
1

It really can happen. May or may not have been the case for this woman. I kind of doubt it.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:34 AM
2

"Cut off his balls!"
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:00 AM
3

I don't care if you don't care that I don't care if you care.... and so on.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:09 PM
2

This is unacceptable. I thought Soylent Green was made of pure men. Now I find out it has women in it! What an atrocity! Boycott Soylent Green!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 07:45 PM
184

No, no, no, men aren't people.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:50 PM
0

You're a moron.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:32 PM
1

And die one of a hundred horrible deaths. Or have one of your loved ones die a horrible death. You "bite his dick" people are idiots.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:37 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:33 AM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:20 AM
0

Haha! Touche!
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:26 PM
0

Thanks for the compliment.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:24 PM
0

Not my fault you have no imagination. You'd make a terrible detective.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:13 PM
25

I've had the same things happen to me also. I'm in good shape. Long hair, full beard. Entitled bitches think they're hot, think they're funny, think they can touch whoever they want, whenever they want. No, bitch, you are not funny, I don't give a fuck how hot you think you are. Do not touch me, and while you're at it, fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:57 AM
1

Sorry, your argument is oversimplified and flawed. There are hundreds of ways I could force you to suck my dick without a gun in my hand (if I were so evil a person). Even more so if you are a female of average build and with average capability (or rather lack thereof) for self defense. Having said that, I imagine these accusers are probably lying.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:05 AM
6

Because women are wonderful /s. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:01 AM
1

This guy pedants^
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:00 AM
5

The latter. However, if they persist, then the former may not be uncalled for, depending on the degree to which they are violating, the nature of their career, and local laws.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:58 AM
34

It's a harmful double standard that is holding society back. It all boils down to this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:55 AM
17

No. It's not hilarious, and it's not just about hypocrisy, it's about personal space. I don't care if you're some Barbie looking bitch or a 6'4" black dude, if you don't know me, you don't get to fucking touch me.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:51 AM
19

Not hilarious at all. She can fuck off. I would have slapped her hand away and told her very clearly "Do not touch me."
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:48 AM
1

Do you have a complaint against The Economist? If so, what?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:46 AM
11

I dislike Donald Trump a little less now.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:38 AM
4

I like older women because they're usually kinder, more appreciative, more accountable, more respectful, less entitled, less demanding, and less full of themselves. Looks aren't everything. Some people have money, irrelevant. Anyone who criticizes this marriage can fuck off as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:36 AM
2

You don't know that. It's none of our business.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:34 AM
5

Finally, men will get the support they deserve (but only the kind of men who menstruate).
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:53 AM
10

Equal rights for women! (But not men).
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:52 AM
1

Fuck off with your sexist bullshit. This sub is for advocating men's rights, not perpetuating stereotypes of sexist attitudes.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:10 AM
-10

He's a bigot, but his past relationships are irrelevant. You're shaming him for failing in love (you assume) the way bigots shame women for being "sluts".
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:08 AM
8

Why did you include a link to Doritos commercial?
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:04 AM
1

Reread my comment and tell me where I accuse you of not paying attention.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 10:05 AM
5

If you do what the person in the photo is doing, you're being inconsiderate. Do you not see that all visible seats are taken and another individual is being forced to stand? Are you one of those who are blind to the very existence of the people around you?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:34 AM
5

Seems a bit fake. Feels choreographed. Sounds like he's wearing a lavalier microphone. I may be wrong. If real, he should have just left the scene. While it may be satisfying to watch bigoted ideologues getting layed the fuck out, this does not help the MRM.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:23 AM
2

She is a disgrace to journalism. May she live a long, healthy, humiliating life.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 09:16 AM
1

Need more Jordan Petersons.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:59 AM
11

Yes, and many programs to ensure we get more women working in sewers and on roofs.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:54 AM
13

The right word for this is "inconsiderate". It has nothing to do with men or women. If anything, its a generational thing.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:01 AM
3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:55 AM
1

It's real. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:55 AM
1

I considered that but then I thought, "Nah, that would be the lamest, dumbass attempt ever at a pun".
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:05 PM
1

Thats like wondering if a 14 year old female rape victim had pubic hair. Its totally irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 07:08 AM
16

Good news for gender equality.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:44 AM
1

Reread the question.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:58 AM
40

That's easy. They don't have the right to go topless in public like men do.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:41 PM
2

Political left and right is a farce that serves only to polarize the people, thereby safeguarding the establishment from revolution.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 01:01 AM
3

People who call themselves liberal and progressive today are actually authoritarian and regressive.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 12:33 AM
2

Politician?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:12 PM
6

In other words. Blue tax.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:11 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocturnal_penile_tumescence
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:48 AM
8

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Women_are_wonderful%22_effect
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:45 AM
12

It's actually not even sexual. When in REM (Rapid Eye Movement) sleep, the brain uses less blood, forcing blood into the genitals. Not only men, but also women, experience engorged genitals while in REM sleep. It's just less visible in women for obvious reasons. Infrared footage of test subjects of both genders proves this to be true. The dreams you have in REM don't even have to be sexual to cause this. This guy is simply an ignorant misandrist. Nothing more. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noc…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:43 AM
28

I think it's a good idea. But, instead, try signs that read, "Equal opportunity and accountability for men and women." It's more egalitarian. Also, be sure to have someone in the crowd who appears neutral to document it on video when they come for your balls. Be sure not to engage in a shouting match with them. Let your words be as few and as reasonable as possible when confronted. We need this kind of thing. It's too bad many here are discouraging you. More of this would help. Less of this is j…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 10:23 PM
9

"Allowed him to fully explain himself." What world are you living in?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:26 PM
1

I think effeminacy stems from different hormone levels.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 09:35 AM
4

It's called antisocial behavior. Nothing to do with gender.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 09:08 AM
2

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:16 AM
1

This is true, therefore it will be downvoted.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:14 AM
47

Holy fuck. Can you imagine living with this kind of person? This kind of shit makes my head hurt. I don't always agree with Peterson, but bless him for his patience. I would snap. I would walk out or throw something or smash my head against the wall or something. It must be like 200 times she makes a point to twist his words to mean something she knows damn well he doesn't mean. What a fucking asshole she is!
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:04 AM
5

You racist, misogynist PIG! /s
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:18 AM
1

I hope you're a straw man sock puppet.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:15 PM
1

I didn't watch your video. I'm responding to your trainwreck of a comment. Not gonna watch the video in your link either.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:21 AM
1

But I didn't upvote.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:19 AM
2

This^
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:16 AM
1

Fuck off with your 'beta' bullshit. We'll like or dislike what we want.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:13 AM
1

Status.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 05:47 AM
20

Let the feminazis do their thing. They're digging their own grave. At least we don't censor them here in this one sub, unlike the hundreds of subs where they censor us.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:41 AM
3

Yeah, unattractive women will get a free car from president Oprah.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:44 AM
1

Everyone I kniw who ever personally met DeNiro said he's a total asshole.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:34 AM
4

why did you assume that he assumed that you assumed that... oh fuck it
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:12 AM
3

Plus, if he succeeds in crowdfunding this, it has the added effect of visibly rallying support for men and boys in the face of the seemingly unstoppable machine that misandry has become over the last decade or so.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:10 AM
1

No, I'm not French. Like you, I don't know how prominent the other women really are. However its easy to confuse famous with prominent though. Colloquially, the former is usually understood to be more about image and the latter is more about real accomplishments.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:35 AM
1

Are you well versed in French culture?
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:15 AM
1

Its pretty clear, judging from the response in this "Men'sRights" forum. Edit: With the exception of yours. (Kinda).
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:41 AM
1

Meanwhile.... MeToo! You snooze, you lose, the world changes, sit by as men become entirely obsolete with the onset of strong AI and total automation. Good plan.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:40 AM
2

Yeah, they would never say the same about the rich, white, successful, American women who are crying "MeToo!"
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:26 PM
2

bad
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:21 AM
2

/u/opfeels /u/Taxus_Calyx
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:19 AM
1

Try r/history.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:03 AM
6

What utter tripe. The sheer number of ad hominem attacks alone makes this article cringe as hell, not to mention the misandrist bias throughout. This kind of shit is everywhere right now. There is a backlash against feminism and so feminists are doubling down. This is good, it means the majority of people are truly fed up with their bullshit. Equality is good. Feminism is hate.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:38 AM
11

Thanks, I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this. Pretty much my thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:21 AM
1

But?
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:54 AM
2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_coercion
/r/MensRights07/01/18 08:49 PM
10

This is a real problem. One could argue that the plea bargain system is an important aspect of the systematic oppression of men in the US.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:44 AM
7

"When it comes to white people's health, we are 100%!" Sounds a little racist, no?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:39 AM
1

This is a great post you shared. Thanks. But it might be too much rabbit hole for a Straughan video? If not done perfectly, it could backfire making her look like a foil hat. We wouldn't want that. But, if she did do it perfectly, they might decide to erase her!! We wouldn't want that either. Double bind?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:08 AM
1

Flair should say retard.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 10:21 PM
1

So it's either be excellent or get fired, huh? No in between? No reasonable system of incentive for improving performance incrementally? No thanks. Edit: Also, this would result in firing most of the women in some jobs. How will the leftists like that? Riots in the street.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:07 PM
22

Because women have a longer life expectancy so they should retire earlier? What thah fuuck? What country do you live in?
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:02 PM
2

Even if it's the same exact job, employers should have the right to pay those who do the job better more money. If they're forced to pay people who do the job less well the same amount, then companies may lose money, maybe even go out of business.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:01 PM
4

They're doing it better (worse?).
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:58 PM
3

I don't say this often, but this really isn't the best place for stupid, racist reviews of stupid, racist games.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:56 PM
39

I believe the Guardian provides this online space for independent bloggers and that sometimes articles like this end up on it. But they sometimes don't last long. They get reported and removed
/r/MensRights03/01/18 06:18 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:15 PM
11

Yeah, if young women didn't have options like these aplenty, they might be forced to enter the kinds of workplaces where their chances of being injured or killed rise exponentially. The gender disparity in modern workplace deaths is directly connected to the modern gender disparity in sexual power.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:49 PM
1

To your knowledge, is Diana also on Reddit?
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:43 PM
3

"A behavioral scientist explains what to do when your boss won't face reality." For this post, we can let "your boss" stand in for "feminism".
/r/MensRights02/01/18 08:33 PM
3

Nah. Saying "So what?" Is literally asking them to keep screeching.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 06:19 PM
16

Report it to the police immediately.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 06:14 PM
9

Stop trying to force boys to be more like girls in school. Stop favoring women based on gender and not merit when it comes to hiring.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:18 PM
4

Yeah I see now. Its pretty one sided isn't it? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/1923580/uk-anonymity-rape-sex-offence-cases/amp/ Society has a real problem with "victim" replacing "accuser" or "plaintiff", whenever the case is a rape case.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 02:11 PM
4

I could be wrong, but I think in the UK the names of both the defendant and the plaintiff are protected. This man chose to make his story known and that is why we know his name.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:18 AM
12

No one in the article is saying what toys kids should play with. The research only notes the natural tendencies that are already present.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 06:45 AM
2

The matriarchy is covert.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 03:29 PM
2

Bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 03:28 PM
0

If anyone should fuck off, it should be people like you. When will you understand that social change is the birth of political change? This is an excerpt from New York Times pertaining to the author's point: Daly personifies a familiar figure: the Gamergate warrior, the social-media men’s-rights troll. His character touches at the curdled heart of modern misogyny — the pickup-artist mind-set that gamifies sex, the grievance that “nice guys” are entitled to women’s attention, the craving by poorl…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 05:48 PM
5

Exceptions can be made for a female applicant. For equality and all.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:53 PM
8

This is pretty cool. Nothing wrong with it at all.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:48 AM
1

Sounds like a blockbuster.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:23 AM
6

Its like one nice bathroom for whites only, and one shitty bathroom for everyone. Seems a little racist no?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 10:27 PM
2

What?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:56 PM
2

Being anti-feminist is NOT being anti-female. As long as feminism is successful, there will be NO equal rights for men. An r/MensRights where the mods try to censor anti-feminist posts and comments would be useless. Female = Human Feminism = Ideology
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:55 PM
1

Whatever. You all can have this sub if you want to start policing anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:11 AM
0

What? You want to police anti-feminism in r/MensRights? Go back to r/MensLib, you misandrist.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:58 AM
2

http://lynnhillclimbing.com/?page_id=5 Lynn Hill was the first person of any gender to free climb The Nose of El Capitan. The ultimate route on the ultimate face. People from all over the world had been attempting it for years. It took ten years for Tommy Caldwell to second the climb free. The two of them are still the only people in the world who can do it.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:56 PM
4

If this is abuse, then I've been abused by past girlfriends waaay more than I myself have ever abused any of them. Also, I've seen waaay more women openly abusing their children and husbands than men.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:22 PM
4

This is an obvious symptom of two things. We live in a victimhood economy, and women are the new economic giants.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:19 PM
1

Oops! She told the truth!
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:17 PM
24

There are some rock climbing routes that can only be free climbed by women due to the extremely small cracks that only women can fit their fingers into.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 10:50 PM
3

Assumption of incompetence applies to men also, regarding jobs that are centered around care (nursing, teaching, disability aids, childcare, etc.).
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:45 PM
2

No, he is in the right place. He's just misunderstanding this post.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:35 PM
6

None of it is meant to be specific. It is meant to represent the disparities between the AVERAGE male and the AVERAGE female.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:35 PM
5

I agree that demeaning women is not productive to advocating mens rights. This illustration is not demeaning it simply points out unfair advantages women are given in our society in contrast to the unfair burdens our society lays on men.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:26 AM
8

Which part?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:10 AM
7

The illustration isn't belittling. Its descriptive.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:59 AM
8

Of course. And I'm allowed to respond to it.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:56 AM
5

You're not a fan of creative data visualizations concerning men's rights. Others of us are. Get over it.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:03 AM
-5

"Planned parenthood" is a conspiracy against father's rights.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:56 AM
2

same thing happens when you call abortion murder on this sub. many of our definitions are lies based on convenience.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:13 PM
1

Like intruding on the life of the little boy growing inside you by murdering him?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:57 AM
0

You got it all backwards. Sex creates humans. Murder/abortion destroys them.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 09:41 PM
0

Murder. Its your business.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:42 PM
1

There's semantics, and then there's unborn children being murdered everyday and everyone pretending like its totally cool.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:45 PM
2

Yeah, we also thought the world was flat for millions of years. Doesn't mean it is. I'm an atheist. My "attempt to change the definition", as you say, is rooted in a secular sense of human rights which I arrived at through reason, not through the Christian community. As I said before, we disagree.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:31 PM
2

Try to wrap your head around this, genius. Fetuses are living beings that have not been born yet. I know, mind blowing, right? EDIT: Just did some research. Apparently, I'm technically wrong according to the current prevailing scientific consensus (which is that a baby is not an organism until it breathes.) Sounds like a definition based solely on convenience if I ever heard one.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:17 PM
0

We disagree. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_rights_and_abortion
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:09 PM
2

A fetus has its own heart beat, its own blood type, its own DNA, and its own REM dream phases. Just because its inside another person doesn't mean its not a living being.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:09 PM
-1

Its a Men's Rights Issue. Just because a few of you support abortion doesn't change the fact that this is a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:52 PM
1

Some women murder their unborn sons. Also, murdered unborn babies have fathers, who have no say. Sons and fathers are male. Men's Rights Get it?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:48 PM
5

Another explanation could be that men who stayed home when sick because their symptoms where stronger than those of women were more likely to pass on their genes than other men because they didn't die from sickness while hunting mammoths out in the snow and rain. They stayed in camp and took a break for a couple days instead. Women were pretty much always in camp, tanning hides, preparing foods, caring for children etc. Men were usually far afield, exposed to extreme weather and such. It was mor…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:46 PM
25

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SyGgMW_sn7k Imagine the public reaction with the genders reversed. Lets say, Jim Carey putting hands around Selena Gomez's neck and squeezing and then kissing the back of her neck and grabbing her ass as she pulls away and cringes. He'd probably end up being prosecuted even if she chose not to press charges.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:52 PM
20

Feminism = $$$$$$$
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:35 PM
101

Or why Jenny McCarthy was blacklisted for strangling and sexually assaulting Justin Bieber on national television. Oh, wait..
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:27 PM
2

Yeah, but you forgot sexual attention that WAS wanted but can be used as leverage or becomes regretted. That is ALSO harassment.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:05 AM
3

My opinion? As long as we put all our hope in "public figures" to allow us up into the light of human rights, we'll keep being pushed further and further down in the mud.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:03 AM
4

Ad hominem attacks are all some people can muster. Like saying all male feminists are womanizers. Or all MRA's are misogynists, or neckbeards, or living in their mom's basement.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:00 PM
30

Awwww. So EMPOWERING! 😇😍🌞🏃😁👠🦋🏅❤️💅🏻💋💪🏻👩🏻👩🏻‍🎤🌼😍😂/s
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:31 PM
1

Good points. I think he might have been pointing out, not that Penelope wasn't in danger, but that she was not in nearly as much danger as Odysseus. I think that, if we are to impose the modern concept of misogyny onto this poem we are just as obligated to not blind ourselves to the misandry that is revealed there. In ancient times, as in present times, males and females have been both exalted and debased in unique ways that result in particular gender roles specific to each of our cultures.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:11 AM
2

That is not actually what I was trying to point out by posting this article here. I actually don't really agree with your comment, but I think that elements of what you're saying are true about some other articles we see and that is still relevant to this article in some ways. Thanks for adding your view on it.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:22 PM
2

Yes, I did and still do have my own views. No, I did not and do not have a direction in which I want the conversation to go. I don't always feel a need to impose my philosophy on others. I also find value in simply learning what others think. I find that I learn more this way sometimes.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:14 PM
3

You are aware that a person can start a conversation without asserting their own viewpoints?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:46 PM
4

wow
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:35 PM
1

I thought the same exact thing
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:35 PM
3

I wasn't trying to point out any of my own views, just presenting the article for those here who also might find it interesting.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:34 PM
2

I have some views on this. Just thought others here might find it relevant. Here's an archived link for those who don't want to support Vox. http://archive.is/4BFfq
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:59 PM
3

Congratulations, you have demonstrated all three: the "poisoning the well" form of ad hominem attack, the "straw man sock puppet" form of internet deception, as well as the "I have the intelligence of a typical 8 year old" form of ideologically motivated double standards.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:37 PM
3

Also has its share of Marvel flavored SJW subtext.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:48 PM
17

This is an excellent article to share with your more liberal friends who still don't think men are treated as second class citizens in the US. Being written by a woman and published at Huffpo, it has automatic cred with libs.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 04:21 PM
3

Enslavening?
/r/MensRights15/11/17 03:37 AM
1

Yay! I love ventriloquists!
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:09 PM
1

At least you admit you're Cuckoo.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 04:16 PM
0

You Koo Koo? Do I sound like I thinks its okay?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:25 PM
1

Feminism.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:07 AM
0

"with us or against us", eh?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:06 AM
3

Yeah, and there's also subs that show guys getting assaulted and people commenting how they deserve it and calling them assholes and dickheads and pieces of shit. But you don't seem to give one shit about that do you? In other words, a bigot.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:00 AM
1

Gotta be REAL bad to have to shoot TWICE.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:40 AM
1

*cumbeard
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:38 AM
14

True. Also, this doesn't mean there are more cases per year of women brutally murdering their SO's than of men doing the same.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:35 AM
6

The author of this article obviously believes we are in no such danger. At the end of the article, the author basically says all men need to change their behavior, even if it isn't really bothering anybody, because "sexual harassment".
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:54 PM
3

Basically, tyrants.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:42 PM
2

you can't argue with abroken record
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:47 PM
12

This is a perfect example of systematic oppression of males in western society. It shows that aspects of our siciety are designed specifically to penalize only men and to coddle women. This sentencing is both a symptom and a vector of the disease that is systematic misandry.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 03:32 PM
1

Death to trolls and assholes! All hail bitches and pussies!
/r/MensRights16/09/17 02:18 AM
1

This is true. In our time, as in Huxley's 'Brave New World', it is not Orwellian censorship, but an overabundance of information which keeps many people blind to the truth.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:07 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 03:55 PM
1

I see your meaning. You have valid points. I also really appreciate your correct word usage.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 03:50 PM
2

Social "science" is the most pervasive and influential pseudoscience of our time.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:54 PM
1

That's an explanation. But I'm sure there are lots of sources too.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:47 PM
2

Your use of 'pedantic' is more pedantic than my use of 'source'.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:44 PM
1

No, its called using words by their actual meanings. Try it.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:42 PM
0

And you'll be an ignorant douche.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:15 PM
1

Not as interchangeable as your logic with nonsense.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:14 PM
-5

I'll be correct, thanks.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:16 AM
-4

Proof is not the same as source.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:14 AM
4

Narcissism has been redefined for the masses to mean the opposite of what it meant classically.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:06 AM
1

Anyone have a good archived link?
/r/MensRights15/09/17 05:55 AM
6

Its almost as if NPD and ADHD are just psycho-babel tools for a social engineering war against male independence. NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder). Shrinks will keep adding named "disorders" to their big book until every person has a prescription for obedience, submission, compliance, and suggestibility.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 05:54 AM
12

You do a great parody of an idiotic misandrist.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:27 PM
19

Ignore the ludicrous social trends until they force ludicrous political changes? No thanks. I prefer to engage ludicrous social trends and have an influence (however small) on preventing ludicrous political changes.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 12:21 AM
22

Until its worse.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 12:07 AM
2

Seems like you're calling the OP a rapist, a criminal, and a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 07:44 AM
3

Maybe OP thinks its a men's rights issue because if we wore that our balls would be hanging out and everyone would lose their shit. Double standard.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:44 AM
2

Must be some man's fault.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:40 AM
1

Our society says average aged males deserve to be buried alive, at sea.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:37 AM
3

No YOU're triggered! No YOU're a snowflake! No YOU're a neckbeard! No YOU are! Yup. Reddit.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:32 AM
0

He's probably addicted to the adrenaline and the hero-worship.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:31 AM
17

Instead, there is a process that encourages judges to discriminate against men and in favor of women in sentencing.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:23 AM
0

Not if you're Batman.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:29 PM
0

You see it all the time, I see it all the the time, we all see it all the time.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:06 PM
1

Favorite thing to do? What do you mean?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:20 PM
-1

You're so edgy.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:23 PM
2

This is why it benefits the establishment to continue allowing circumcision of baby boys. It fundamentally sets the underlying tone for a culture of misandry.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:20 PM
11

Exactly. It isn't that men don't feel pain. Its that men are not real people. They lack the humanity of women. They are subhuman. Lower forms. This is the thinking.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:04 PM
2

"Smith, 23, wept uncontrollably in the dock in April 2016 after a jury found her guilty of murdering Ayeeshia" Don't they mean she wept "controllingly"?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:42 PM
1

Poor militant us crap is the enemy.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:17 AM
7

It was 4 when I made my comment.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:04 AM
52

You get my upvote because I don't need an /s to see sarcasm.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:47 PM
1

Who exactly are you pretending to be?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:36 PM
-5

Abortion is pretty fucking brutal. I mean, these tiny humans have their own heartbeat, their own DNA, their own bloodtype, but because they have no voice and no means to protect themselves, these violent women murder them and have the audacity to say it was "their body".
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:07 PM
1

So, no consolation prize after all.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:22 PM
5

And social issues. And humor. Sometimes relationship advice too (though the advice is usually just "dump her").
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:04 AM
3

Are you serious? If someone wanted to make a post to intentionally portray people on this sub as petty, failed to launch, neckbearded, basement-dwelling, virgins, it would look just like this post. To be fair though, yes, I'm sure the artists are explicitly instructed to illustrate more "minorities".
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:02 AM
10

We get to go topless at the beach.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:21 PM
22

So, feminism is an abuser. Now it makes sense.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:23 PM
1

Did you just assume Popeye's gender?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/17 11:44 PM
1

Sometimes.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:32 PM
1

I found a more complete article on this old news. Gives a good critique of the faulty thinking o this "teacher". http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/update-kindergarten-teacher-denies-legos-to-boys-in-name-of-gender-equity/article/2576760
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:24 AM
1

This makes me sad. I'm looking for a hole in the sand. I'm not cut out for social media. Too depressing.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:18 AM
1

just one more reason to never send your kids to public school ever
/r/MensRights25/08/17 01:57 AM
9

They're obsessed with rape. Its like modern justice leaves a rape shaped hole in their souls, so they invent imaginary rape to fulfill their animal desires.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 09:58 PM
2

Aircraft mechanics get paid more, get less dirty, and don't have to break their backs as much.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 09:54 PM
1

Boobeeeeeees!!!
/r/MensRights24/08/17 09:52 PM
466

Judge makes the excuse that he has to "consider the welfare of her child". We all know that, if she were a man, he'd be saying that his committing such a crime suggests he is unfit to parent. The real reason single mothers get lighter sentences is not "the welfare of the child". Its misandry and gynocentrism plain and simple. If these judges gave two shits about the welfare of the child, they would more often than not be making sure these children are protected from the influence of these crimin…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:34 PM
8

Not to mention, in most if the cases where lefties use the terms white supremacist, Nazi, misogynist, fascist, it is against people who not only don't identify as such, but are actually opposed to those who do identify as such.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:57 PM
1

If you agree with me that calling women cunt here doesn't help our cause, then why are you arguing? You just enjoy arguing.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 11:34 PM
1

I don't think calling women cunts helps. You do. I'm done.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:05 PM
1

I suggest we not throw around the word "cunt". You suggest I not make such a suggestion. We're both making suggestions about the best way to have a conversation here. The difference is you're mischaracterizing my suggestion as something it isn't. Neither of us is "dictating" or "controlling" anything. We're not even mods. The ironic thing is, you have made suggestions to me in the past about how I conduct my conversations here, and now you're accusing ME of controlling people for doing as much. …
/r/MensRights17/08/17 02:08 PM
1

No, its the one thats owned by Charles Manson.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 01:42 PM
0

Haha. "Dictating".
/r/MensRights17/08/17 01:40 PM
0

Haha. "Controlling".
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:58 PM
2

I had no idea John Stossel was so savvy. Good on you, John.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:54 AM
1

I agree. That's why I added the qualifier "if anything". Thank you for clarifying.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:13 AM
2

Yes. You get my upvote.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:57 AM
4

Explanation is simple. Fewer women are willing to knowingly risk their lives by working in jobs that are inherently dangerous, therefore, when they do die on the job, its a few percent more likely to be by murder, unrelated to inherent risks on the job. Whereas, more men are willing to knowingly risk their lives to support their wives and children by working in jobs that are inherently dangerous, therefore, when they do die on the job, it's a few percent less likely to be by murder, unrelated to…
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:53 AM
2

r/theydidthemath
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:43 AM
7

r/theydidthemath
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:42 AM
10

So many judges feel that female criminals should get lighter sentences because they have children. Why don't they realize that, if anything, these women should have harsher sentences, to ensure that their children are not subjected to criminal treatment and criminal role models during the children's most formative years? I'll answer my own question. Misandry and female privilege.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:37 AM
2

I agree. Doesn't change the fact that throwing "cunt" around here doesn't help the cause. You want an echo chamber? That's how you get an echo chamber. I try not to throw epithets around at all. I don't always succeed, but I try. Not the best way to have a conversation, and a conversation is what we need if we want to sway people to believe that men are as human as women.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 02:02 AM
1

Personally, I hate when users here throw around the word "cunt" as an insult to women. It does nothing to gain sympathy for the advocacy of men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 01:24 AM
1

Oh. I didn't see it.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 01:22 AM
9

You forgot the right to be forced to die in a war you don't support.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:48 AM
2

So irrelevant.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:45 AM
5

This is a great post. If he had not been disabled, and if his dad had not been on the board, and if he had not the financial means for legal representation, the situation would have been even worse. We might never have even heard of this injustice at all. The fact that he is disabled might lead to more sympathy from people who are on the fence regarding men's rights. Also, I wish you guys would stop throwing the word "cunt" around in the comments here. It doesn't offend me, but it really doesn't…
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:44 AM
2

Your comment is the first time I have ever heard the term "cuntsplaining" anywhere. You live in a fantasy victim reality.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:22 AM
5

Details in the following article suggest she was doing this to try to get a refund on some courses she had dropped. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4795218/Student-charged-falsely-reporting-rape-Michigan.html It's only a man's entire life she would have ruined. Sad thing is, if she had been more intelligent, and had stuck to a single story, she probably would have gotten away with it.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:17 AM
7

Being white has shit to do with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/17 12:10 AM
-1

Zero. This post mostly bugs me because it doesn't provide any context that directly relates it to men's rights. How many times a day do you fap to a picture of Hodor?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:17 PM
-1

I watched enough to know that its shit.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:11 PM
-6

Why do you guys even watch this show? Its contrived and one dimensional. Its sole theme is murder (mostly of men). This post is vague. I have no idea what it is even referring to. And yet its been upvoted almost a thousand times already. It should at least have a link that explains WTF the title is even referring to. Is this a MensRights sub or a GOT fanboy sub?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:35 PM
4

We are a media firm looking for talented writers. Help us exploit the gold mine of today's culture. Insult maleness make $$$$$$. Email for details [email protected]
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:30 PM
8

Shitty link. No pass. No pass denial. Unprofessional officer.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/17 11:12 AM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:14 AM
1

Thanks, I'm not seeing it though. Maybe because I only use mobile app.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:27 PM
1

Something like that, I still can't quite figure it out.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:27 PM
1

I couldn't figure it out either.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:49 PM
3

The rights of men,and the advocacy thereof, aren't owned by "MRA's". For her to say that "being a man couldn't be easier" is a pretty obvious attack against anyone who wants to improve the rights of men.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:01 PM
4

I guess I should have said "men's issues", since "men's rights" is now trademarked.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 04:36 PM
10

I think you mean "bich".
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:06 PM
2

All four of your examples are pretty good. Maybe a version of the third one? Something like: "So far, a lot of the world's problems have been solved by men and women. Let's continue working together and solve them all."
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:58 PM
1

Has shit to do with intelligence or nationality. It's cultural norms and misandry.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:24 AM
5

Yeah, there's an idea!
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:20 AM
29

Who will take care of the child? Uuuuhh, how about ANYONE but this crazy fucking bitch who thinks its cool to use the child's life as a bargaining chip for her pathetic, manipulative, emotional bullshit!
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:44 AM
3

No one is riled up. Merely pointing out another of the many examples of a certain culturally acceptable double standard. Your comment essentially condones misandrist culture.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:39 AM
1

Your comment is so far down I can't tell if its directed at the face puncher or the reason user.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:34 AM
1

Meh. Women (and men) should have the right to wear what they want in public. That said, men (and women) should have the right to cast their gaze anywhere they want in public. If a woman wants to show off her anatomy in a natural food store, that's cool, as long as she doesn't complain when dudes (and chicks) check her out.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:52 PM
1

Fight the patriarchy, eat a double bacon cheeseburger!
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:43 PM
6

Prison.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:40 PM
8

Just in case anyone doubts the fact that women are officially the superior class in the US. The female supremacists have won. Female nationalism is beyond criticism. Fem heil!
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:40 PM
1

I would vote for Anne C. Cools as POTUS.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:58 AM
2

Wait, the pussy wins in this one?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 08:18 AM
21

MGM apologist: "I believe everyone has their own freedom of choice." Me: "So let these little boys grow up and choose for themselves if they would like to be circumcised."
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:29 AM
2

https://dnatesting.com/paternity-test-if-a-former-partner-refuses/
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:28 AM
16

Unfortunately, doing this would subject the OP to prosecution. Pretty sure its illegal to conduct a DNA test without the mother's permission (which is sexism).
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:06 PM
1

Whatever.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 03:31 PM
3

Before there was such thing as wealth, it would still have been more advantageous for young women to select older mates, because they have proven themselves. This is why so many other mammals do the same thing. Gorillas, chimps, moose, bears, etc. They all have the same preferences as humans. Females prefer older mates and males prefer younger mates.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 11:47 PM
8

Studies have shown women prefer men older than themselves, with a little grey hair and some wrinkles even, and some scars. http://www.science20.com/news_articles/evolutionary_psychology_why_women_like_older_men_and_men_like_younger_women-145652
/r/MensRights12/08/17 10:13 PM
27

Evolutionary biologists have been saying for quite a long time that studies show men prefer women whose appearance cues youth. A mate at the beginning of her reproductive phase has the potential to provide more offspring over a more prolonged period of time, thus increasing the male's chance of passing on more genes into future generations. Conversely, women prefer men whose appearance cues more advanced age. This is because a man who has lived longer is more likely to have traits that are valua…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:19 PM
1

Almost funny enough to make Kevin come out of the closet.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:48 AM
7

The question "Dunkirk" raises is not "Where are the women in this movie?" but "Where are the women in real life dying by the tens of thousands to protect their families and countries from those who would destroy them?"
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:42 AM
2

I used to want to fuck her. Now I want her to go fuck herself. But she CAN suck my dick.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:37 AM
2

I'd say 10 years or less.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:36 AM
1

It's virtually impossible to sway feminists. You would have more of an impact (and be less likely to go to jail for tampering with mail) if you just leave DVDs laying around in random coffee shops and such. Especially if you label the DVDs with various popular movie titles.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:35 AM
7

The article says the Rooneys used money from their slavery operation for plastic surgery. I think they picked the wrong surgeon because those are some ugly fuckers right there.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:30 AM
5

It is a men's rights issue because it would be illegal if the roles were reversed. That amounts to systematic discrimination based on gender.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:27 AM
2

Right, that's why in the first two trimesters, the foetus has its own heartbeat, its own DNA, and its own blood type. Because its "her body". Idiots everywhere.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:13 AM
1

You are wrong. I was not raised by a mom. My dad loved me, and now I'm here. Alive.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:32 AM
7

Cuz everyone knows its not a baby. Its "her body". Right?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:08 AM
2

Right and left in politics is a lie. Its a tool to divide citizens in order to protect the establishment from revolution.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:59 AM
2

I take it back. Strictly, neither is totally true. The former is relatively true though, compared to what has been required, not only of male humans, but many male animals. Biology (evolution), more often than not, forces males to meet more strenuous requirements in order to pass on their genes (think peacocks, moose, etc.) Males of most species are protectors and providers. The result is that females of many species enjoy having much of the work of survival done for them by males. This isn't tr…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 12:17 AM
0

And yet, its true.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:43 PM
0

It is.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:15 PM
1

Skynet tire repair. Duh!
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:17 PM
2

I see what you're saying. However, rather than social media "highlighting" the problem, I would say that it exponentially amplifies it.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:38 PM
-5

Haha. All these down votes and rebuttals. You all are in denial of technology. Skynet is coming, my friends.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:43 PM
8

To be fair. Some of us do the same thing in reverse. Social media is the problem.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:10 AM
-13

This might be in anticipation of the growing use of autonomous weaponry, where physical capability will be less important in combat. Not saying its right.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:02 AM
3

In related news...https://patch.com/washington/seattle/caffe-fiore-burned-possible-arson
/r/MensRights06/08/17 10:22 PM
3

From the article: "Girls are socialized from a young age to be 'good' at relationships. Boys are more often encouraged to focus on performance. All of this gets ramped up in adolescence." Completely ignoring all the research that has shown that these traits are typically innate, largely dictated by gender specific hormones.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:46 PM
1

Yup, I was right.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:49 PM
7

Also, poor women go home to everyday proof that "the patriarchy" is a myth. They know from experience that their sons and brothers and husbands and fathers are just as oppressed as the women they know.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:29 AM
2

Misandrist virtue signaller. Publicly making light of the rights of males earns the commenter brownie points in the new culture.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 08:38 PM
2

No. More like comparing apples to to chicken livers.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 08:09 PM
1

They should also ban men with a history of violence against other men. Because men are human too.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
1

They should also ban men with a history of violence against other men. Because men are human too.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
1

They should also ban men with a history of violence against other men. Because men are human too.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
0

They should also ban men with a history of violence against other men. Because men are human too.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
0

They should also ban men with a history of violence against other men. Because men are human too.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
3

They should also ban men with a history of violence against other men. Because men are human too.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
10

God bless her soul. (And I'm atheist so thats saying a lot).
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:24 AM
1

One side of her face is even more evil than the other.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:57 AM
71

First rule of society, no one talks about how women control everything.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 09:47 PM
2

This is a good article, and makes a good conclusion on behalf of men. I suggest using the direct link.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:09 AM
3

maybe its because men are disposable
/r/MensRights22/07/17 09:18 AM
4

Unfortunately not exactly true, as many children have better role models on TV than at home :/
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:27 PM
7

Thats not quoting. Its parsing.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:25 PM
1

Its cowritten by two men.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:42 PM
1

This is what I wrote, "It supports our theories of evolutionary psychology, which in turn informs our understanding of differences in agency between the sexes, and ultimately debunks the patriarchy myth." I should have said "ultimately contributed to debunking the patriarchy myth" because obviously it takes more than one guys interpretation of one article to bring down the straw man of "The Patriarchy". What I'm referring to is the complimentary nature of the minds and behaviors typical of the t…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:40 PM
1

I see your point.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:28 PM
2

That would cut out some of the speculation some of the time, but certainly not all of it. One potential problem I can see is that this is not likely to stop a sexual assault, although it may encourage people to put themselves in situations where they might be more likely to get assaulted, by instilling a false sense of security.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:38 AM
3

Evidence of what? That something came into contact with someone's breasts. Speculation is still required to equate this with sexual assault.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:14 AM
2

Direct link here for those who want it. http://observer.com/2015/10/guys-heres-what-its-actually-like-to-be-a-woman/?utm_campaign=social+flow&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:47 AM
2

Incidentally, there is a link to this article in MensLib and the comments there are (not surprisingly) hilarious in their blatantly willful ignorance. Feminists don't science.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:06 AM
3

More often than not, that proves true, but not always. Doesn't mean we should stop research on the subject, or stop our ears to the results of such research.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:05 AM
1

The article is about new proofs. Its not claiming this is a whole new discovery. Did you even read it?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:12 AM
7

I think that the gender studies crowd should take heed of this. It supports our theories of evolutionary psychology, which in turn informs our understanding of differences in agency between the sexes, and ultimately debunks the patriarchy myth. Among most mammals, females and males have very different roles. This does not mean the males control the females. Its a mutually beneficial arrangement. Disturbing it can be dangerous to the species, especially when its done with self-deception (as with …
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:07 AM
1

I'm not saying this is the biggest problem first-world men have to deal with. I just think its funny how this mobile unit has two toilets for women, and only one for men, and that the men's one is the one at the moment that is needed (indicated by the red light showing it is occupied). Its reminiscent of how women receive much more entitlements and exemptions, while it is actually men who are more in need of advocacy right now. Also funny how the whole picture involves themes of basic human need…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:13 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with using the term "survivor" if there has been a conviction. Before conviction the term used by the media and other public commenters should be "accuser".
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:42 PM
2

"According to Jewish law, the gett (divorce) is in the man's hands—if he wants it, he'll give it; if he doesn't, he can refuse." Whats this, the middle ages? Also, why should the father's pay just because the child is under 6?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:39 PM
1

I thought the same thing after I wrote my comment but decided not to change it. I think my comment is still true because I said "usually" not "always". The same is true for the life expectancy gap. Not all men die younger than their female counterparts.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:15 PM
28

So, aside from those four grammatical errors, there is nothing at all wrong with this sentence, right? /s
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:01 AM
19

If a few men die, hey, thats what they're for right? /s
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:44 AM
1

The life expectancy gap has everything to do with hypoagency. Men of the developed world are the tools and puppets of their women. Tools usually don't last as long as the people who use them.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:41 AM
1

They give a damn what the people think only in so far as the people are likely to rebel. If you keep the people divided, their power to rebel is weakened. The "getting rid of him" part is all just part of the show.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:34 AM
1

No. Left and right, at their core, are both the rich. Like money, the left/right lie is a human construct designed to control the masses.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:39 AM
1

Thats what the establishment wants you to think. He was chosen just like all the rest.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:37 AM
6

Nonsense. If people want to be so courteous as to offer their seat to a breastfeeding woman, that is their prerogative, good on them. Conversely, If a breastfeeding woman wants to act like anyone who doesn't offer a seat is some kind of degenerate, then fuck her. No one forced her to have children, that was her choice. And guess what? Parenting is work. So shut up and get to work and quit acting like its our job to make sure you and your kid are comfy. Women all over the world breastfeed as they…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:14 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:25 PM
2

I agree.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:25 PM
1

Trump and Hillary are old friends. Two heads on the same hydra. If you think Trump is any different than the rest, you've been gamed.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 11:15 AM
2

If nothing else, an article like this one might be much more likely to change minds tainted by feministm than say, your average AVFM article.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:27 AM
2

I think you're probably right, but I'm no authority on it.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:22 AM
1

"we need a Hegelian synthesis. That's sufficiently vague so that we can all agree with it." I agree.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:04 AM
1

Good points.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:02 AM
1

"egalitarianism. But that doesn't really inspire activism." Therein lies the problem. Some of you are't here for gender egalitarianism at all, but to benefit men and punish and ridicule all women. Just as bad as feminists.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:00 AM
6

Thanks, but I don't really recognize right and left in politics. I think its a ruse to make the population believe that they are divided when they truly aren't. The only ones served by the liberal/conservative dichotomy are the establishment. As George Washington warned, the two-party system leads to tyranny from international bankers.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:17 PM
2

I thought I was a feminist kind of, not as an activist, but in principle. Then, I had a feminist fiancee who would hit me and kick me and bite me and throw sharp, heavy things at my head. That, and one other thing led me to be more anti-feminist. The other thing was that a few years ago I decided to join the social media phenomenon. I got a Facebook account and a Quora account and quickly found out that lots of feminists were literally in favor of systematic oppression of males. I remember someo…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:12 PM
0

If you had continued you would have also found this "They are wrong in their diagnosis that gender privileges exist only for men or only for women, or that oppression only exists for women or only exists for men." I consider bloviation more like when someone tries to dispute an article they haven't even read.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:47 PM
1

I don't agree with the author wholeheartedly, but I think he has some valid points. This might piss some of you off here, but I personally would love to see a day where our word for gender fairness does not have "fem" or "men" in it.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:03 PM
6

Hahaa! Waiting for you all to stop being crazy! So true. And yet, all through time i think opposite sexes have looked at the other as kinda crazy. Culture these days is pretty volatile. Seems kinda cruel to drop a new human into this shitstorm, especially if it turns out to be a straight white boy.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 08:56 PM
4

Ever heard of facial recognition? Surveillance cameras?Detectives?
/r/MensRights17/07/17 08:45 PM
1

Possibly a trollbot posting as a sock puppet MRA to make us look like repetitive morons.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 08:43 PM
1

You're right. And status leads to security. Not just personal security but often security for our descendants too.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:32 AM
1

Ooh. I love magic!
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:27 AM
2

Gotta get me a Hong Kong girl.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:11 PM
1

I deleted this post. How can people still comment on it?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:32 PM
12

The irony of a corporation using feminist complaints about overpriced goods to sell overpriced goods.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:54 PM
1

You're forgetting that women take longer on average to do their business in a portapotty.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:43 PM
2

They have alphas but everyone gets it on, leading to smaller inner circles in which the members protect each other from the alphas. In other words, the dominance of the alphas is diminished through kinky, promiscuous sex, leading to a more egalitarian society.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:52 PM
2

Not with Binobo chimps, who have orgies of all kinds and display more humanlike social structures.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:40 PM
2

Is that Mary Katherine Gallagher?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:38 PM
2

Yeah. In your case, the internet walks on you.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:30 PM
3

Marriage! Haha!!!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:29 PM
2

This same group sex concept also explains why women tend to make more noise during sex. It served as a notification to any other men in the area that the woman was going at it and that they might want to jump in there when the first gentleman was done.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:22 PM
2

A lot of evidence points to the idea that our ancestors loved orgies. This was beneficial biologically since having more sperm in the reproductive tract of a woman's body will increase her chance of getting pregnant. So, if women can orgasm over and over again, often requiring lengthy sexual encounters to orgasm, they would be more likely to take on more than one partner in a sex session, thereby increasing their chances of getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:21 PM
1

I think it might be nature at work. Evolution might have led to most women requiring an actual gang bang to climax.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:03 PM
2

Exactly, they need more toilets than normal if all the guests are female, or else the lines will be longer. This is because, normally, half the festival goers (the men) take half as long to use the toilet as the other half (the women).
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:57 AM
1

Shitposts with images from Twitter, Facebook, etc. are usually pretty self explanatory aren't they? And they are relevant to men's rights because changes in culture inevitably culminate in changes in societal norms and laws.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:51 AM
16

We hold the meetings under the bridge now, around the burn barrel. You should try and make it next time, we share snacks from the dumpsters down the street.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:45 AM
2

Mathematically, you need to order more toilets or the lines will be longer than when half the festival goers are male.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:39 AM
3

I wanna see the bands with women stand up say no.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:36 AM
1

I've also noticed that a lot of the people who say "never hit a woman" are accepting of hitting men. Its blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:34 AM
3

I like your shoes. Use em.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:28 AM
6

And you're not an asshole at all. And your comment wasn't cheeky at all. Hmm.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:27 AM
3

Left and right dichotomy is bullshit sold by the establishment to keep the population divided. Feminism is turning into the same thing.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:21 AM
2

I don't know. I think a lot of people would miss the sarcasm in this and take it at face value, laughing about how stupid men are and not appreciating what we actually do in these jobs. A little too subtle. Instead of gas station attendant green screen at the end, I wanna see some chicks actually go out and fall trees and mine underground. Then we'll see who works safer and who looks like an idiot.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:14 AM
1

Because cheese exploits female cows.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:59 AM
2

This person didn't even say that. She said 90% were cases of "we were both drunk".
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:52 AM
11

I think a man found with 6 dead infants would get quite a bit more than 25 years. This woman killed these babies. Just because they don't "have marks" as her lawyer says, does not mean she didn't kill them. The examiner said they were most likely born alive.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:49 AM
1

Unless mandatory child support is repealed, i a known significant other proves positive through inutero paternity test, they should also have the right to sue the doctor to stop the abortion.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:54 PM
1

Sorry. This article neglects to mention a clause in the law which states that the husband of a woman getting the abortion can sue the doctor to stop his wife's abortion.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:09 PM
0

I disagree but I can understand why you'd think that.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 12:16 AM
1

A men's rights issue, that's what.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:15 PM
1

This is pretty enlightening. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:16 PM
3

Good headline. Too bad it wasn't on the front page of an international paper.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 09:10 AM
0

You made a critical remark about these people on a sub called r/MensRights sooo......
/r/MensRights12/07/17 06:27 AM
3

Oh, my comment "some women are predators, like some men" got downvoted. Let me retract my statement and replace it with a better one. Women are predators. Is that better? Do you guys seriously not see how you are letting the feminists turn you into a reverse version of them?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 04:47 AM
0

NOT a men's rights issue. Adults of both genders have the right to a sex life free of your judgement. If they're two adults and they are not too worried about fucking around on each other, thats their business, not ours. No wonder nobody takes us seriously at MensRights. Grow the fuck up. All of you getting worked up over shit like this are worse than feminists. NOT a men's rights issue. Its a culture issue. Culture policing is not the same thing as the pursuit of human rights for all genders.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:25 AM
-3

Some women can be predators too, like some men.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:17 AM
3

Now they will start rating hurricanes by gender. The more potentially dangerous the storm, the more masculine the name, because mens is evils.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:13 AM
4

Maybe it isn't so much that people "don't respect" female names. Maybe its that people don't automatically assume females are going to kill them, whereas males....
/r/MensRights12/07/17 03:12 AM
0

Yeah, and I don't see anybody complaining here in the comments either /s
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:50 AM
-1

Yeah, men shouldn't have the right work overtime if they choose too. You're right, its a MRA issue.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:49 AM
-6

I can't believe the stuff that gets passed of as men's rights related here. We need another men's rights sub. One that deals only with men's rights issues. Then you guys can use this one to just complain about the womens.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:26 PM
1

You're so full of shit its coming out your ears. You just make shit up to try and justify your authoritarian stance against this woman's right to express herself.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:06 PM
1

You claimed she didn't have the right. If she didn't have the right to, there would be a law against it. Do you know how law works?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:56 AM
0

You dumb fuck. There is no such law prohibiting people from being offended. Besides, it wasn't a private setting.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 04:40 PM
17

Be mutilated as soon you come into the world. Be beaten in public by your significant other and have the witnesses just laugh at you. Work for peanuts in a job that will probably kill you. Get raped and have most people assume you definitely enjoyed it. Be homeless and have nobody give a fuck. Get your children taken away from you because you have the wrong genitals. Oh yeah, and take your shirt off in public.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:12 PM
0

What a stupid thing to say. You always have a right to be offended, no matter what.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 02:26 AM
10

If female circumcisions were done with western medical standards, the girl victims would survive as often as baby boy victims in western countries.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 07:53 PM
1

Can anyone provide a working archived version of this please?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:18 AM
1

He was texting in a public setting. She has a right to look at and take pictures of his phone just like I have the legal right to take pictures of strangers and their interesting clothing (or lack thereof) on a train. If you want to keep something private, don't make it visible in public.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 03:06 AM
7

"This is not a men's rights issue, this is inexcusable and that guy is absolute garbage if he can sit there and literally watch a child starve to death in front of his eyes. Reprehensible on every level." This comment is most accurate. Those here who are arguing against it fall into roughly three categories: Unscrupulous, ignorant of the basic principles of justice. Blind faith in men's rights related ideologies, basically the reverse of feminism (addicted to victimhood). Male (or female) misand…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 02:55 AM
1

"Ideological purity" Sounds like the core tenet of an extremist group.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 02:41 AM
2

Who are you to say she can't complain?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 05:13 AM
2

Agreed. The fact that your comment has been downvoted is discouraging. We should have a separate MRA sub where misogynists, homophobes, and racists are banned after a certain number of irrelevant posts.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:18 AM
2

This OP is appealing to men's rights activists to rally behind him in his opinion that men should NOT have the right to wear whatever the fuck they want. The irony.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:16 AM
40

That is fucked up. Some serious systematic sexism there.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:47 AM
4

So, this has what to do with men's rights? Are you gonna say our right to text what we want in public is being threatened? Because this chick isn't even saying he doesn't have that right. She's just exercising her right to express her disagreement with it. This is a sub for men's rights, not complaining about women in general. The fat shaming thing is only relevant to men's rights when someone is actually threatening the right of men to express their opinions about obesity. This chick has just a…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 03:44 AM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? I didn't say being poor makes you immoral or dishonest. But if you wanna say that poor people are less likely to break the law, that's cool. Alternative facts are all the rage these days.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:01 PM
1

You're the one operating on feels. Because you're a homophobe.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:05 PM
6

Drugs, mental health, and race and class segregation all play a part here I bet. Also, its an an undeniably great example of technology lending itself to the cause of men's right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, just like women.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:45 AM
3

"Introducing... the wage gap myth myth myth myth ." Moving on to NEXT year's bullshit...introducing the wage gap myth myth myth myth myth myth... (this passes for intellectualism?)
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:37 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:29 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:29 AM
2

Right. Again, thanks for exercising your right to be a dipshit. You're a real service to men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:10 AM
1

White trash knights. Hm...
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 12:38 AM
2

Oh I get it now. For me, this is a sub where we stand up for our right as men to be as we are. For you, its a sub where you exercise your right to make other men feel socially unacceptable for being as they are. Thanks for the enlightenment.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:12 PM
12

Sounds like harassment to me. The part where she feels you up with the excuse of using you as a napkin is sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:29 PM
17

So wait, you sleep at work? And watch 6 minute videos of people screaming and cursing about social issues? At work? What do they pay you for?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 06:45 PM
10

Wow, I am amazed daily by the irony of the many ways in which SJW's clamor for censorship in the name of freedom. Screenshots is the only alternative I can think of in my limited knowledge.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:12 AM
5

Studies show women are more likely to conceive with a partner whose semen they frequently swallow. It's also a healthy "snack" to stave off hunger, men can eat healthy and drink plenty of water to improve the flavor for their partners, thereby encouraging repeat "snacking."
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:06 AM
1

These homophobic dipshits might be the worst thing we have going for us on this sub, no the genuine misogynists set us back even more.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:58 AM
1

Whatever you do, bashing transvestites is't gonna help.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:57 AM
5

Men also have the right to be feminine INSTEAD of masculine, if that is their choice. The OP doesn't realize that he is AGAINST men's rights. The right to act how the fuck we want as long as we aren't hurting anyboy. We don't need this fool to tell us what a "real man" is any more than we need feminism to tell us what a"real man" is.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:25 AM
0

"The fact that you don't understand it doesn't mean its a load of shit." I understand perfectly well that you are confusing your homophobia with our concern for men's rights. Fuck off with your authoritarian culture policing. You're as bad as the feminazis.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:11 AM
1

What a load of shit. Men have the RIGHT to dress and act however they want, so long as they aren't harming anyone, just like women. This drag queen might freak you out because you're a reactionary traditionalist, but she/he ain't harming anyone. If anything, we should be supporting this person, not making fun of him/her.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:38 PM
10

Please explain to me how this relates to men's rights in your view. Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 07:46 AM
15

Yeah "just cut off the baby's face, less skin to clean" said no one ever. But if its part of a boy's penis, "whack that shit"!
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:55 AM
6

No worries, I guess I'm in attack mode too.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:53 AM
5

As I said, I see it, it's relevant. What do you want, a fucking medal?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:46 AM
2

I read the article before I commented. Thanks for your response. I see it now. Bit of a stretch, but relevant.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:15 AM
1

Aren't you supposed to swallow them?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:17 AM
33

This is because advertisers capitalize on women's day and ignore men's day.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:16 AM
-11

I'm pretty sure you have the wrong subreddit. Unless you can explain what this has to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/07/17 04:13 AM
2

Riiiight, "Lets make it legal for male high school teachers to fuck their female students, as long as the girls are 16 and they're into it. It'll be great!" That would be stupid and wrong, just like what this female teacher did. Prison.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:23 PM
3

You are the embodiment of the empathy gap.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:19 PM
2

Direct link here http://observer.com/2017/06/ukraine-war-soldiers-suicide/
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:05 PM
6

I know some of you will say that this doesn't belong here because, in your minds, this is not a men's rights issue. I disagree. All over the world, cultures and governments treat men as disposable. Its amazing to me that even people who call themselves men's rights activists are sometimes indifferent to the double standards surrounding the value of a man's life and the value of a woman's life. I'm not here to belittle women or blame them for all my problems, I'm here to highlight that men are pe…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:16 AM
1

I have not tried to paint her as anything. I have asked, "Would the reaction be the same if a man were to accidentally kill his wife in the same manner."? I think the answer is no.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:06 AM
1

Take that a step further. The women would all have to be physically identical since so much of their power relies on being prettier than other girls. So it would suck for dudes too. No variety. We'd all have to fuck clones of the same boring, almost ugly chick forever. The hierarchy setup has its perks. Some guys earn more. Some chicks have bigger tits. Maybe that isn't so bad.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:57 PM
8

Wow. It's like "Hey, join our movement, but you can never really be a member." With undertones of, "Help us in the exact way that we instruct you and we may grant you temporary immunity when we start sterilizing and culling the straight white men."
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:51 PM
9

I'm guessing, if it were the other way round, and it was 'all her idea' and she was the one actually shot and killed, he would not receive the empathy that she is receiving. People would say he is an unfit father and the kids should be taken away from him.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:47 PM
3

What you said at the end.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 10:45 PM
52

Also, men generally have a daily hormone cycle, with testosterone being highest after waking up, and lowest at the end of the day. This is because testosterone builds up when we are inactive. Women have roughly a monthly cycle, due to menstruation. This means women would only be pardoned for crimes because of hormones at certain times of the month, while men would be pardoned for crimes they committed in the first part of every day of their lives.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:08 PM
0

Direct link here, http://www.ibtimes.com/who-monalisa-perez-youtuber-tweeted-about-most-dangerous-video-ever-killing-boyfriend-2559922
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:02 PM
1

I'm interested in cultural trends as well as men's rights. Also in the conjunction of the two. Things that aren't "more serious stuff" can be far more consequential than you might think when it comes to pop culture influencing human rights in the long term, big picture. Like how Wagner inadvertently gave birth to the third Reich.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 09:25 AM
3

Its like you're a human that makes too many assumptions and has a superiority complex.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:26 AM
29

Apples and oranges. Both fruit. MGM and FGM. Both child abuse.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:15 AM
9

Like the foreskin, the appendix does have a purpose. Recent research suggests that it normally serves as a breeding ground for beneficial gut bacteria.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:30 AM
2

Of course its not always true. I did not, and would not ever say that. It is common though. Check this out http://www.womenshealthmag.com/beauty/octomom-syndrome Here's one relevant quote from the article, "Mother Nature prods us by making sex and its aftermath feel amazing. Oxytocin, the so-called "cuddle" hormone that promotes bonding, floods women's bodies during intercourse, pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding. "[The pregnancy feeling] is like a love drug," Weil says. "A baby-love drug.…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:08 AM
5

No, not at all. According to the top comment on the page, "Its really sweet and wonderful".
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:37 AM
3

For me, I've found women admire that I have the balls to respectfully disagree with them when they regurgitate feminist bullshit. Kind of turns em on sometimes. This is in person, where my kindness and humanity come out in my expressions and tone. Whereas, online, there is lots of room for misinterpretation, unless you are a great writer.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:31 AM
1

Maybe they're not necessary.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:22 AM
1

"According to Psychology Today, almost half of teenage girls 14-17 who murder their mothers, committing matricide, have an accomplice — either a friend or a boyfriend. The average age for girls to commit matricide is between 14-17, said Kathleen Heide, a professor at the University of South Florida"
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:37 PM
4

Pregnancy makes most women euphoric actually.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 08:58 PM
31

Yeah, why would people who claim to stand up for the rights of males give two shits whether or not some people choose to remove natural, healthy, functional pieces of newborn boys' bodies, long before the age of consent?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 08:57 PM
2

Well, women can legally have children by buying eggs, and sperm, and "renting" wombs (contracting pregnancy surrogates), so, of course, men should legally be able to do so as well. Children don't need a mom and a dad. They need supportive, loving, responsible role models of all ages and genders, and a safe home, relatively free of traumatizing conflict. If a single man, a gay couple, or a sterile man and a sterile woman as a couple choose to provide these things to a child with the help of sperm…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:34 PM
2

Blokes in the UK cant get enough of that Gamorrean poon.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:41 PM
3

Gamorrean
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:40 PM
1

Your scare quotes should be around 'kidnapper', not Good Samaritan.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:15 AM
3

Sharia Law and feminism are not that dissimilar.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 02:16 AM
1

"O" as in Oprah?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:27 PM
36

your facebook makes mine sound like a walk in the park
/r/MensRights28/06/17 10:24 AM
3

gimmick
/r/MensRights28/06/17 10:23 AM
6

If this poor guy had't helped, some woman might have stolen the small human and sold it into slavery.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:25 AM
1

: (
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:24 AM
1

Fuck that shit. I'm in there. If anybody wants to fuck with me about it, thats their poor decision and they can suffer the consequences on their own later.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:22 AM
18

I don't catcall. Still, if you tell someone they're sexy, that doesn't "reduce them to their sexuality".
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:38 PM
3

Ah yes, the rape apologist feminists who love to blame victims.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:59 PM
2

Our language gives shape to our moral structure, and our moral structure gives shape to our society. So what kind of society do we want to shape going forward? I myself would like to live in a society where we don't judge each other by our sex/gender or other natural, inborn human traits.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 08:21 PM
1

How do you search comments in a specific post?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:51 PM
2

I agree with most of what you're saying. But tree falling is pretty fucking cool. I've fallen a few square miles myself. So, to me, its not about cool. I think its more about personal security. With the help of the establishment, women can generally attain personal security without risking their lives, based on the very merit that they are female, as with gender specific STEM education subsidies.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:49 AM
2

The wage gap! Patriarchy and misogyny strike again!
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:39 AM
1

Try Epilady.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:13 AM
1

I feel sorry for you.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 03:24 AM
3

Pussy calling the vagina twat.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 01:01 AM
1

Could be the opposite. Could be that fewer women are good at chess because chess is relatively antisocial compared to other competitive activities and women are generally more social than men.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:57 PM
1

That's because Rousey DOES realize that women in general are less physically powerful than men. She is generally opposed to feminism. Unfortunately,she also had a bad streak of arrogance, partly due to a bad training camp. She has since had a great deal of that arrogance knocked out of her.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 11:36 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:40 PM
4

This is a good article. I'm sure the title makes some of the more traditionalist members here squeamish, but there are lots of interesting links and studies mentioned here. This is pretty sympathetic to men's issues, especially for the New York Times.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:17 AM
5

You must have read the wrong article.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:13 AM
6

I agree that the officer may not have been a misandrist. It is interesting though that he chose the side of a couple of inconsistent women over that of an innocent man.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:09 AM
1

Great point. Lynn Hill was the first person of any gender to free climb the Nose of El Capitan in Yosemite. Lots of other similar examples too.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:03 AM
5

Female genital mutilation is illegal. Male genital mutilation is state sponsored.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:06 AM
1

Totally! Wow!
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:57 PM
1

Oh, yeah! Now I get it. You're so right. Thanks for helping me see the light! That makes so much sense. You're pretty smart.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:44 PM
1

Right, and if your employer wants you to get breast implants and you don't like it, just get another job. No. There is no job for which employers are justified in requiring employees of any gender to alter the natural, healthy, functional state of their body parts. Cleaning your body is not the same as altering it, so don't even go there.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:17 PM
8

Awesome link. Too bad there isn't a "super upvote" option.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:53 PM
4

Call your doctor if you become a raging misandrist bitch.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:06 PM
1

You're "sure it does" and yet you offer zero explanation as to HOW shaving ones beard offers any biological advantage. Pretty fucking weak.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:00 PM
6

So, women who have not had kids and/or, for medical reasons, are unable to menstruate, have massive pecs and can run a 3 minute mile.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:57 PM
6

Side effects may include female privilege, dehumanization of half of the world's population, and hypocritical ideology.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:52 PM
18

I've had WAY worse inflicted on me by a woman. And yeah, nobody gives a fuck, especially the cops. Good on the abused boyfriend for staying calm and rational. And good on the friend for documenting. We need more of this.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:51 PM
1

And yet, shaving your beard offers zero biological advantage. So what's your fucking point?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:37 PM
61

"Male teacher has romps with consenting teen female students," Said no headline EVER.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 08:24 PM
1

I'll make it as simple as possible for you to compensate for your willful ignorance. The characteristics of my beard, much like my foreskin, are determined by my genes. Therefore these things are a natural part of my being. My BO, or micro-biome if you prefer, has its own millions of sets of genes. While I may be in a symbiotic relationship with the bacteria on my body, that does NOT make them PART of my body. My micro-biome may be influenced partly by my genes, but is not the result of them, bu…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:11 PM
1

My beard is not your beard. Its mine. My micro-biome, on the other hand, is subject to radical change depending on my diet and environment. You wrote a long comment, doesn't make it any less full of shit.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:47 PM
2

I've seen lots of bearded women. Doesn't have shit to do with what we're talking about though. Lots of workplaces wouldn't allow a man to have long hair even if it was up. And just because some bacteria are important doesn't mean BO is "literally part of our being". Do you live in the same land of make-believe as the feminists?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:24 PM
4

You use hair as an example and conveniently forget to mention that in most workplaces long hair for women is acceptable but for men it isn't. Stench is not part of your body. It is a condition caused by decomposing bacteria ON your body.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:40 PM
0

Requiring employees to wear uniforms is nothing like requiring them to remove natural features of their body.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:21 PM
-1

"Specific standards of grooming"? That's pretty vague. You can absolutely have specific standards of grooming without requiring men to shave their beards, which are a perfectly natural and harmless feature of the average adult male face.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:53 PM
1

See my other comment (directly below) and you'll find that I am not exclusively a "buzzkill".
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:52 AM
1

I see what you mean.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:38 PM
1

Thanks for reminding me of that shitty movie. I guess it was actually supposed to be funny. I hated it, would rather forget it it exists. Good point though.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:34 PM
1

2017 Wonder Woman is a shit role model for children of any gender.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:32 PM
2

I can't think of any movies where dudes kill a stripper and its supposed to be funny. If the director thinks she's doing women a favor, she's sadly mistaken. Thankfully there are plenty of women who aren't as hateful as her.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:43 AM
2

If this isn't real, its well acted and choreographed. If it is real, it doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:06 AM
4

Do you want a boot up your ass? Cuz thats how you get a boot up your ass.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:03 AM
1

I don't think she would do that unless she was being physically attacked. But yeah, she would certainly present them with an argument they are ill equipped to logically refute (emotionally refute is something else).
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:55 AM
3

I see a man and a woman peacefully sharing a public space together.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:31 AM
1

Black is the new orange, no?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:54 PM
82

No. Neither ma'am not ma'm nor man. When on a crowded train, its called "being inconsiderate". When on a train with few people, its called "getting comfortable". Gender has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:36 PM

Exactly, there is no excuse for an adult acting like a toddler.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:32 PM
1

"We were glad when he acted in a manner we perceive as feminine."
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:30 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:32 PM
54

Gold Bond medicated powder prevents chafing.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:43 PM
20

I'm a "person of color". Pink is a color, right?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:40 PM
0

Its not my problem if you don't know how to look up irony in the dictionary.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:33 PM
0

Wow.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:46 PM
3

I'm not referring to the Wondereoman in general, with all her powers etc.. I'm referring to Gal Gadot's portrayal of Wonderwoman in 2017 as compared to to Sigourney Weaver's personae in Alien.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:31 PM
3

Smear shit all over the whole bathroom and flush a roll of TP.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:18 AM
4

Ripley would waste 2017 Wonder woman. Ripley is as badass as Chick Norris.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:13 AM
4

Mmmm...paper sandwich thingies.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:09 AM
9

I was commenting there for the first time today and mentioned that the plaintiff in the Cosby trial shouldn't really be referred to as "the victim" since we haven't established if there was actually a crime committed against her. There was some feminist basically trying to explain to me why it is just to presume men guilty before proven innocent when it comes to rape. How will I know if I've been banned there? Do you get a notification?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:49 AM
-12

Sounds like you behaved as childishly as her. Is this a made up story?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:44 AM
1

I can't look.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 05:39 AM
2

So, putting the same responsibility on women to register for selective service that has been put on men, might literally be the key to putting an end to all wars.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:51 PM
3

I still think they should either abolish the selective service or include women in it. Pronto.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:26 PM
1

The irony of self proclaimed MRA's arguing that boys should only have certain names.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:25 PM
4

Raven isn't a bad name for a boy. If you make fun of someone for their name, it only reflects poorly on you.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:02 PM
2

You seem cornfused.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:46 PM
4

We won't see another draft in the US.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:16 PM
1

I don't see where in this study suggests that this is new. Where is the reference to older studies. that ask fathers the same questions, but get different answers. I'm pretty sure dads have always felt like they need to be more productive and more present with their family. Its kind of an animal instinct right?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:03 AM
-1

Not gonna happen because drones and robots.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:58 AM
3

What does your friends have to do with it? Would they ostracize you or something because you believe men have as much humanity as women? If so, maybe you should find new friends so you can just have one Reddit account and not have to keep track of lies.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:54 AM
2

There must be hundreds of females subscribed to this sub. Right? Why not?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:48 AM
10

There is no fine print. Are you looking at it on a smart watch or something? Did you lose your glasses? Unless you're blind, you can see plainly the lie that is "domestic violence is violence against women". No. Domestic violence can be inflicted on women, girls, boys, and surprise! Men! And quite often when women inflict violence on the men in their family, it is because they think they are better than men. And yes, the children in the family are permanently scarred by witnessing the controllin…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:43 AM
1

Does "subbed" mean subscribed?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:32 AM
29

It's almost like the people who made the ad were trying to show their client how fucked up they are.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:26 AM
8

Mmm.. grape juice.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 06:01 PM
1

Step 1: Stop being so shallow. People aren't numbers. Looks aren't everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:13 AM
2

Disgusting, depraved, deplorable, and despicable. Just like everything else I do. Because I am a straight white male. Sarcasm.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:51 AM
9

I'm pretty sure she's a Gamorrean.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:30 AM
4

Mmm, rainbow bread. I always wanted to try it, but alas, I am a white, cis, male. I only eat baby pandas.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:26 AM
2

This is what it takes to get people to be interested in men's rights. We have to present men's rights as a situation where a woman is being attacked. Then they will all stand up beside us!!
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:23 AM
3

First few sentences reveal author's biased agenda. Just another 'journalist' foisting their opinion on the masses, with very little facts or data to be seen.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:16 AM
5

Not table scraps. Stone soup. A bunch of hungry people add whatever they have, even if its not much. Everyone gets a bowl of soup in the end.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:11 AM
7

It has a lot to do with mens rights when you compare the rate of incarceration for men to that of women for the same crimes. Misandry costs taxpayers millions.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:01 AM
4

It's not fake. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:58 AM
5

"Touched without permission" Doesn't even mean the person intended to touch you, much less had sexual intent.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:51 AM
9

You forgot, its only sexual harassment if its directed toward a woman. Because men are trash.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:48 AM
10

Its wrong because you are cutting a perfectly natural and functional part of another human's body off of them for good and throwing it in the trash, before they are even old enough to be able to give consent.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:49 PM
0

Trolls! Everyone in the world who doesn't think just like me is a troll!
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:19 PM
1

Moronic... here we go...
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:47 AM
1

Sorry, I'm trying to figure out how to work Reddit and the app. As for me hurting the movement, one person's nuance is another person's nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:41 AM
0

Wrong link, sorry. Was supposed to be about nullification in general, as in with contracts and waivers. I'm not well versed in Reddit and online flame wars in general. Lets just say you win.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:35 AM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_(U.S._Constitution)
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:28 AM

Ah yes, so all laws and cultural norms are correct by virtue of their very existence. Thank you for enlightening me.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:21 AM
0

Carry on, your Excellency.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:15 AM

Straw man means I oppose you and am presenting a false personae which has a weak argument. I do not oppose you, and I am presenting myself as I am. We don't have to agree on every detail. Sorry for making note of the white knight thing. Jeez! I always thought knights were male and dames were female. My favorite knight is the Green Knight. My favorite dame is Dame Ellen.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:13 AM
0

In life, I choose not spend time around people who call my words and actions 'stupid' and then explain themselves by saying 'Oh no, I wasn't calling YOU stupid." If I have a problem with someone's words and actions, I explain what that problem is, I don't just say, "Your words and actions are stupid."
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:12 AM
0

Technically, we are having a conversation actually. And I don't mind at all if you disagree with me. What I find exasperating is that you and others like you feel the need to insult people's intelligence.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:06 AM
0

Man, I really enjoy some things about Reddit so far, but you people who love to throw around insulting words are exasperating. Can we not just have conversations without having to prove each other wrong all the time? I don't agree with everyone here, that doesn't mean they're all idiots and undercover feminists. At first I was glad to have some people to talk to about men's issues, since most people in the real world think you're a man baby or a misogynist for bringing men's issues up. But I hav…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:56 PM
-10

Yep, and hired killers for the CIA are still cold blooded murderers.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:40 PM

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dame
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:37 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dame
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:31 PM

Knights are male, my friend. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight The female equivalent is referred to as 'Dame'.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:17 PM

I see what you're saying. You're wrong about the straw man thing though. Its just that we don't agree on every nuance of every argument. Not everyone who disagrees with you is an undercover feminist.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:11 PM
7

I see what you're saying.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:29 PM
-10

I think this is better. "I need feminism because... Oh wait, no I don't, because... I need equality because... Oh wait, no I don't, because for the past 42 years or more it is men who have been treated as less than equal to women."
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:10 PM
11

"Sexual objectification is wrong! Unless you you're sexually objectifying men, then its A-Okay!!"
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:04 PM
6

Your logic seems to be: "If a person is getting paid to do something, it automatically cannot be immoral."
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:00 PM
-8

They don't specify the sex of the person making the allegation, so the "white knight" epithet doesn't apply.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:33 PM
84

To top it off, this producer who was "shadowing" the girl is basically a creepy stalker, but in this bizarro world, she/he is now apparently some kind of hero and protector of women. And, as if thats not enough, she/he is a PAID stalker, and the COMPANY who paid this person to creep around after this girl, also paid to make sure the girl would get drunk by a pool with this hunky dude, and now the company has fired the girl and the dude and is looking into prosecuting one of them (FOR DOING BASIC…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:35 PM
1

Yeah, I'm new to Reddit and this /u/rethgil and a couple others have really tainted the experience so far. Combative, assuming, antagonistic, condescending. Apparently has time to write 5 paragraph rebuttals against things I never even said, as well as comb through all of my posts and comments. Poor thing.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:14 AM
1

Thanks for all the valuable info ;)
/r/MensRights12/06/17 02:19 AM

You are quick to assume a lot of things about my position. You seem happy to peg me as an enemy in areas where we actually agree. You have good points, but your antagonistic attitude, paired with your condescending verbosity, is exasperating.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:47 PM
1

You're a real hero.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:41 PM

Wow, you're really rude.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:38 PM

Who are you referring to when you say "he"?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:42 AM
1

Is that excerpted from the text in question?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:03 PM
2

Sexism.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:00 PM
1

Try what?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 09:57 PM
1

So many words. I guess you must be right. When a person works for money and spends it on themselves and their family, it really isn't doing anything to maintain their existence. Thanks for enlightening me.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 08:03 PM
3

What?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:32 PM
3

Good job on not having that feeling there, friend.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:31 PM
1

There's this thing called money. When "others" consume the products of his labor, as you say, he gets paid money. Thats why its called "paid labor". So you see, self-maintenance all around.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:30 PM
2

Uhhhh, paid work is 'self maintenance' also.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:29 PM
5

Or not thinking enough, maybe?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:25 PM
1

From Chivalry to Terrorism: War and the Changing Nature of Masculinity
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:47 AM
1

Okay, I looked up markdown. I can definitely see how websites could suck without it. I can also see how its kind of an arrogant and overbearing strategy and could hamper effective online communication and online cultural development in the long term overall. But what do I know? I'm not a programmer.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 05:41 PM
5

robots will do all the hard shit
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:20 AM
3

honestly the gangbang in a bathtub fulla diamods sounds like another level of hell too.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:16 AM
1

No. And I don't think it matters either.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:08 AM
3

y tho
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:05 AM
3

You seem cornfused.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:00 AM
1

Good thing it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:29 PM
1

Good thing we don't have to agree on everything :)
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:27 PM
5

Kinda threw yourself under the bus there. Try the sidewalk.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:36 PM
2

I disagree. Men absolutely should have the right to choose paternity testing,obviously. That's no reason to ignore the fact that humans can inherit behavior from their parents biologically. I've seen way too many examples in real life. Do you not believe in genetics or something?
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:18 PM
7

You don't actually think I'm arguing that paternity testing should not be a choice for men? I'm not. I'm just saying kids do inherit peculiar behaviors from their biological parents, which they will often display if even they have never had contact with said parent.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:11 PM
2

True. The child could also very well be displaying biologically inherited behavior.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:08 PM
13

Its on the level right above the whites only parking level, right? Because crime and stuff?
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:41 AM
17

Mimicry is not a trait that animals or humans display during sleep.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:32 AM
8

How about two hands clasping? We aren't here to start a fight. We're here to bring peace.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 06:55 AM
2

Very excellent point. Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:18 AM
3

Beware of the sock puppets, brothers and sisters.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:15 AM
2

Most animals are sexual. We are natural sexual beings. MONEY is a purely synthetic OBJECT. To think of another individual in a sexual way is to recognize them for the living breathing being that they are. To think of a person primarily as a source of money is truly objectifying. Women objectify men when they use us as ATMs. Men humanize women when they think of them naturally as the sexual mammals that they are.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:21 PM
1

Lets all pray for Rethgil.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:31 AM
7

Tank top. Shorts. Flip flops. No tie. Same rights as women.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:36 PM
9

Pretty sure what was going through her mind was the visceral euphoric dopamine rush you get when being in control of someone else's life. Many people are like this, some people take it to extremes and ruin the lives of those they control, or end them. It isn't just women who do it, but those women who are good at it usually do it with a very gender specific mix of sexuality, codependency, guilt-tripping, hypoagency, victimhood, and virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:32 PM
7

The author of this article is a despicable person.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:12 PM
8

I just signed up a couple weeks ago and I was automatically assigned a bunch of default subs. One was Twox. I already unsubscribed.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:15 AM
2

I saw it. This is the only reviewer that I agree with so far http://www.nationalreview.com/article/448213/wonder-woman-pc-heroine-lacks-passion-complexity
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:25 PM
4

I wanted to like it and was actually surprised and let down when it sucked. Lots of weird feminist propaganda and crappy CGI.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:20 PM
2

Lots of really reasonable criticisms of this dud's bigoted rant in the comments. Good to see.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:16 PM
6

Most operating systems are misandrists these days.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:12 PM
7

I say show up and identify as a man who is interesred in learning the same things these women want to learn. Bring a body camera and report on what happens. Stay calm and let them dig themselves into the sexist hole that they are truly coming from. Or maybe they'll be cool with it and you'll have fun, make some new friends, learn some outdoorsy shit and have a video to remember it by.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:59 AM
10

Its not blood, friend. Just say bodily fluid.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:49 AM
1

I see. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:27 AM
1

Childishness and lameness, eh? And how did I insult you again?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:12 PM
1

People like you.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:43 PM
3

No one use the words "woman" or "women" to search for porn. They're using much more colorful words.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:03 PM
1

good point, same with football, gymnastics, jiu jitsu, tennis. they all take a toll on our kid's bodies that last into adulthood. its a trade off though, there are benefits to being successful at such activities while young.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:49 AM
6

Seriously, I just watched this movie for the first time. It is certainly subversive enough to deserve a deep analysis. Interesting how this version of our super heroine declares herself as our only movie superhero who believes in 'love' and 'peace', and yet she is the least conscientious of all our present movie super heroes, she marches defiantly toward vengeance and assassination, she kills the German villain with relish and self-righteousness, no inner conflict, no empathy, dehumanizing. This…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:30 AM
17

Tell her its important to you to be treated as a human by ALL the people whom you allow into your life. Tell her that if she's not interested in treating you as she would like to be treated, then you can't spend any more of your time and energy on her, because life is too short and you only get one, and you don't deserve to spend yours being treated as less than human. If she still tries her SJW intersectional mental gymnastic mind tricks on you, say goodbye. You can do better, think about findi…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:12 AM
2

Most search engines are misandrists today.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:04 AM
1

Why are people down voting this?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:20 AM
3

Heeaaavyyy.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:48 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 04:01 AM
5

Thank you, more fitting for sure.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:08 PM
1

You are confusing empathy with sympathy, OP.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 11:06 PM
6

Though feminists hate it, it is sometimes enlightening to compare rape to other crimes. For instance, when feminists say it is misogyny to tell a woman not to dress too provocatively, I point out that telling a person to lock up their most valuable possessions is not the same as condoning theft. I think the same argument works here, but in a different way. How promiscuous a woman is has no bearing on whether she is false reporting a rape or not and here is why: Say you're a person who has LOTS o…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:25 PM
0

I think this is great. It doesn't seem pertinent to men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 06:14 PM
7

This looks like a false flag.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:58 AM
6

Notice how the adult male seems as though he is not allowed to lay hands on the female aggressor.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:19 AM
3

How is the accuser not being charged with defamation?
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:40 PM
11

I think the sign is more degrading to men than women.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:36 PM
19

Not a fuck was given. Meanwhile, if you LOOK at a female coworker wrong, you can be fired.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:24 PM
3

Don't let the worst women be your paradigm for all.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:20 PM
1

I love Picasso, Mattise, Braque, Cezanne, Rothko, Kandinsky, etc. Sorry, this guys work doesn't come close.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:00 PM
6

Its as if the press wants to capitalize on the public's ingrained assumption that women are acted upon and men are actors.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:08 AM
4

I read the article. The piece would have been much more impactful if it had been done the level of quality of the other two statues.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:05 AM
4

I read the article. I know lots of 'artists' who say they make their work crappy 'on purpose'.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:03 AM
4

Too bad he's a shitty sculptor. Looks more like a turd than a pug. If he had made the sculpture with comparable quality to that of the bull and the girl, this would be awesome. As it is, its kinda pathetic.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:31 AM
3

"penis is a social construct" and "erection is the embodiment of toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:54 PM
1

Do understand how oppression works? Do you not see how a society that mutilates little girls, takes parental and reproductive rights away from women, forces them to go to war for causes they don't agree with, makes it easier for men to get an education, and hands out harsher sentences to women than men for the same crimes, can result in fewer women ending up in higher paid occupation? If you can't see this, there's no point in arguing with you because your will to be ignorant is too strong.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 05:35 PM

Sure, refer to everything I wrote in that comment beyond the part you excerpted.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:45 AM
2

They also don't compensate for that fact that we aren't meeting demand for some high paying jobs, like engineering and science, because boys are being discriminated against, last on the list for financial aid in education, and even systematically oppressed through selective service, family court, planned parenthood, the criminal justice and correctional system, told that their genitals should be hacked up as babies, etc, etc... We'd all be better off with an equal opportunity (not affirmative ac…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:21 AM
5

Its as if the only opinion on male genitalia that matters to society is that of women.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:27 AM
8

Good point. There would likely be protest from the grand high inquisitors of feminism.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:26 AM
1

How is it a pain?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:21 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:42 AM
1

Betsy Stevenson almost seems to be suggesting that we transform lower class men of the 21st century into the new middle class women of the 19th and 20th century, to enable todays middle class women to become more upper class. Meanwhile, I guess we just wait til robots can replace all the plumbers, roofers, garbage men, loggers, and underground miners.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 06:39 PM
1

Studies have shown that the more developed a society is, and the more opportunity its citizens have, the more they succumb to instinctual gendered behavior. In other words, in places like India and Iran, a high percentage of upper class women are pursuing things like medicine and engineering. While in places like Sweden and the US, women are more likely to pursue things like nursing and teaching.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 04:45 PM
1

Evolution too. Think about the lifestyles of ancient humans and the different ways in which men and women are suited to deal with different environmental pressures over the last million years. Think about the gendered behavior of most mammals. Hypoagency is not only a tool for human females. It goes back way before humans.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 04:19 PM
3

yeah thats why feminists don't care if a dude sticks his genitals in a little girls face as long as there's music playing and he sways his hips to the beat.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 04:13 PM
20

I had a girlfriend who was only 5'4" and 100 pounds. She took up damn near the whole king sized bed, and most the blankets too, every night. She thought it was funny. She would just giggle if I asked her to control herself, thinking it was just another one of her cute little quirks. Incidentally, she was a full on misandrist too. Glad I snapped out of it.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:55 AM
2

In some alternate reality in our multi-universe, this is where we diverge into an all female species, by redifining 'terrorism" as "masculinity".
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:31 AM
9

Humans evolved so that males would lay low during sickness because their eveyday lives were roaming far afield in inclement weather and vanquishing mighty beasts, and doing that while sick will fucking kill you. Humans also evolved so that females would shrug off sickness because their everyday lives were keeping the fire going, nursing the babies, tanning hides, etcetera, and thats a vacation for a ancient males humans. We are slaves to our genes, for now.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:19 AM
2

Or "ideas" I mean. Most misogynists and misandrists are oblivious to their own sexism.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:27 AM
2

Just like misogyny, misandry doesn't require "hatching plans".
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:25 AM
2

That would be unwise of them. It would reverse their misandrist branding. In the long term, they'll make more profit by only ever excluding men.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:07 PM
7

Cinema has women only showing, feminists: "It's not like men can't watch the movie, just that specific showing, no big deal." Cinema has men only showing, feminists: "MISOGYNY!!! THE PATRIARCHY!!!"
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:55 PM
1

They will.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:50 AM
1

Yum! They should just call it pussy bread. They'll get rich.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:58 AM
7

There will only be 5 men per 100 women. The men will be genetically engineered to fuck like champions. They will have no thoughts of their own. When they aren't fucking they do maintenance, take out the trash, and hold purses. Meat robots. There will also be artificially intelligent white knight holograms to support the sacred wominz and provide companionship and empathy.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:56 AM
89

Misandry is the hottest marketing tool around.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:05 PM
1

No, anywhere. http://www.finaid.org/otheraid/lgbt.phtml
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:33 PM
1

Yeah, like I said, go to their website and you'll see one.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:30 PM
1

Interesting point about smaller government. I tend to think "big and small" government in this day and age are both going to entail TOTAL control in some form or degree so...changing the culture is the more promising approach in my opinion. Raise awareness of ALL human rights in creative ways, like Cassie Jaye did, and we will slowly bring things to a more rational and fair world for everyone. The government will follow.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:28 AM
2

They would probably take it seriously and I would be eternally doxxed as a Jim Crow racist.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:19 AM
3

I just went to the website nyc.gov/getcertified . I hate to say it everyone, but this post is misleading and under-informed. Some of the government sponsored posters have white males, so...this thread is kind of a waste. To any well informed feminist lurking here, we look like we're crying over nothing. There ARE MANY ad campaigns and social programs that DO deliberately single out straight white males though, so same rules apply.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:17 AM
10

You just made me realize, someone could make an awesome video showing how all the segregation laws of the old south can be justified with postmodern social justice rhetoric. Could be funny as well as damning to the postmodern neo-marxist lefties.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:09 AM
3

I don't think that was her sentiment. I think her sentiment was more like, "No surprise! another male acting like a piece of shit and another female getting blamed for it, as always!" But yeah. YOU are right. One way or another, this girl didn't kill this boy. That's perfectly obvious to us reasonable people. However, if a girl commits suicide because a boy says something or even just looks at her wrong, feminists will blame the boy, "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights25/05/17 03:04 AM
3

I think the kid was kinda homely. May he he rest in peace. Also, I think the only reason they included the description of him being normal, good looking, and successful is because many people assume that those who take their own lives will be outwardly depressed or unpopular. I think it is relevant to the article in a human way, and it could even raise awareness and prevent future suicides of people who seem fine.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:58 AM
3

There are basically the same amount of men as women in the world. Only a couple percent more women. Since you're gay, they'll give you special treatment. You'll be able to go to college for cheaper for one thing. And you'll have more support resources in a university than a straight white guy would. Also, you can get more justice than a straight guy from the court system because you can say people made hate speech or committed a hate crime against you. No one ever gets convicted for hate crimes …
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:49 AM
9

"... the whole reason that interpersonal violence is even seen as problematic in the first place is because of feminism." The author is obviously living a fantasy world where the feminine is the only true source of morality.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:07 PM
11

I think what you mean is " a man and white". Otherwise, the picture you posted automatically proves half of its title to be false.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:47 PM
2

I think they chose a faux satire headline to lure leftists into reading the article. Without such a title, most feminists would skip reading an article like this altogether in favor of curling up in their cozy echo chamber.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:32 PM
1

But I don't see the top statement as "correct", so why would I have used it as a "correct example"? As I said before, I believe there are problems with both statements. "Nuance" is the word in your reply I would agree with. These issues are anything but simple.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:25 PM
21

I see it more as this young man broke under the weight of the growing number of expectations we place on male behavior. It is men who are demonized as perverts, while women are exalted for their sexuality. The more this imbalance increases, the more of this we will see.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:28 PM
6

Yaaaaay, we won some men's rights! Only for men who menstruate though :(
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:39 AM
0

I think both statements have problems. I think the first assertion is closer to truth and the second statement is more of a lie.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 09:01 PM
4

"White heterosexual men are not policed by society." Really? That must be why we have so many statements about what "real men" are supposed to do and be. This is journalism these days, idiots spouting poorly formed opinions as though its "news".
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:13 AM
4

I think he means "(You) Please don't make posts here in r/MensRights on Reddit for which the title ends up displayed in ALL CAPS or ALmoST ALL CaPS."
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:01 AM
3

For me, realizing that feminism is toxic and that I must to some degree go my own way has been great for my dating life. I now stand up for myself and am not blind to subtle, manipulative control games that good people sometimes instinctively play. I communicate my needs and emotions clearly and honestly, and respect the needs and emotions of the women I date as equally important as my own. Not more important. Not less important. We have great sex and there are no lies to keep track of. We enjoy…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 09:22 PM
2

"CASTRATE HIM AND TAKE HIM OUT IN THE STREET AND SHOOT HIM!"
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:00 PM
4

http://m.homedepot.com/p/3-5-in-12-Teeth-Steel-Chainsaw-Blade-for-Woodcarving-35812/301531867?cm_mmc=Shopping%7CTHD%7Cgoogle%7C&mid=sb5qX5Nwc%7Cdm_mtid_8903tb925190_pcrid_195274179091_pkw__pmt__product_301531867_slid_&gclid=CPOw7MvfgtQCFc5ffgodg_IPRQ
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:28 AM
3

1) Germany's privacy laws don't allow naming the male defendants in full either. 2) I don't know the statistic for the average sentence in Germany for men who are convicted of the same crime, do you? If comparison shows that men get harsher sentencing, then I think its pretty obviously gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 05:23 AM
5

Except that, in their vision, companies will be mandated to hire at least 50% women.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:18 AM
1

Without quotes around "today" a reader might think the author is talking about today.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:00 AM
14

Shit journalism. They can't decide if it was diving goggles or ski goggles, or if it was a circular saw or a chainsaw. WTF!? How can I take anything else in the article seriously? I'm just gonna find articles about it from other sources.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:41 AM
10

She only mentions fathers who are feckless, leaving us to assume that this would be a gender specific law only applying to men, which would be class oppression. She does not mention accompanying this law with new laws against abortion. So... in her system, if women decide they don't want to be mothers they can end the heartbeat of their unborn child, while if men decide they don't want to be fathers, they are coerced by the government to go through the motions of parenting.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:52 AM
1

Lvinia Woodward meme: She had expert knowledge of how easily a laceration to the femoral artery can lead to brain damage or death. NEVERTHELESS SHE PERSISTED.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 01:22 AM
5

Why doesn't the press show any mugshots of Woodward?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:17 AM
1

8D Awoooogah! She is FINE! Where do I get in line for being her fuckbuddy/stab victim?
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter