TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TejrnarG Archive

View 6 posts and 343 comments by TejrnarG on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes, aggressive as in that the body moves forward, hands move towards his face. Defensive would be to either try to dodge, or at least to move the hands in a block pose. Both was certainly not the case.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 01:40 PM
2

Well I agree, I didn't claim it was. : )
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:47 PM
1

Well I see that differently, but whatever. ; )
/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:16 AM
2

Yeah that probably wasn't the case, based on spelling alone. Haha, forgive me. I am not an English native speaker. ;D I do think it was. There is footage for example from Tim Pool, who walked back and forth between the brawl scenes and the actual event where people gave speeches a couple of times. Unfortunately that's not how it works. The games of the radical left and right bleed into normal politics. And before you know it, there is a civil war. Well, I agree with that. Its a problem for sure.…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:46 AM
1

But even if there was a nazi group involved, which may very well be, then what we saw was a bunch of commies and a bunch of nazis beating the crap out of each other on the side, while a pieceful free speech event actually could go forward. I couldn't be more pleased with this situation! May the scum of the earth, both left and right, neutralise each other and leave the rest in piece. : )
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:26 AM
6

Whatever mate. She made an aggressive move towards him, not a defensive one. I am not defending the guy, but in my eyes, given the fact that it was a brawl, which both joined intentionally its fair game in my estimation.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:09 AM
6

Looked to me like on the contrary, he was part of a rampaging mob, and she just happened to be on the opposing side Well, let me see. That was in fact a free-speech rally, to which she turned up as counter protester as a member of antifa, the neo-marxist-left equivalent to nazi brownshirts. Before she went there, she bragged on facebook that she was "determined to collect 100 nazi scalps". The other dude is a member of a white identitarian group. He probably wasn't in there for free speech, but …
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:06 AM
4

Well, I think she did make an aggressive move towards him. She was not blocking or dodging defensively. But anyway, even if not so, as you layed out, she really was looking for troulbe, so I don't feel sorry for her in the slightest.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:49 PM
25

A sucker punch is a punch at someone who doesn't see it comming. So no, it was not a sucker punch. Its hard to say who hit who first, but both moved towards the other aggressively, and both hit each others faces. It was fair game. You could say, "but she is a woman". But the moment she joins the front lines in a protest which has gone violent, she has lost any special "I have a vigina" protection.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:41 PM
2

Time to found a party I guess. : )
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:40 PM
2

Thats what I thought LOL. He lives in his libtard bubble you know. Doesn't take notice of what happens out in the real world.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:34 PM
1

Wow, now thats a story. Thanks for sharing!
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:28 PM
2

I agree with you in the sense that politically incorrect humor is not necessarily the issue here. The issue for me is (1) That a joke like this has no business in politics. (2) The double standard. This joke seems perfectly acceptable to the political audience, while any other joke on the cost of anyone other than white male, would cause immediate outrage. I hate outrage culture with a passion. But I also hate double standards, and they should be exposed.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 07:24 PM
0

No, it doesn't. If you have a degree in Biology it should be christal clear to you that feminist theory is pure garbage.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 01:02 AM
6

Here an article on that. Out of the article: When asked about his remark, Fochtmann told The Daily Caller “a joke’s a joke isn’t it?” “I’m a white male. I’m an old man, and I’m appalled by what’s happening to a lot of people my age, and their either lack of morality or whatever it is,” he continued. “There’s no big protest going on about [the Trump] administration.” “It’s anathema to me. I hear a lot of people out there espousing things about being good Christians, being patriots and what not. W…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 12:16 AM
2

EDIT: Oh, ok I just have seen that you actually said that more or less yourself in the comments . /EDIT Well, she nails my feelings when you read those sentences isolated. In the context with the rest of the text it becomes clear that she believes there is such a thing as patriarchy, and that it is responsible for all our problems, men's and women's, and feminism would be the proper solution, if it was just propagated in the correct way. And sorry, I just think thats absolute bull-crap.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 11:35 AM
1

Good. Then he can use Amazon again. : )
/r/MensRights05/04/17 11:30 AM
11

Whatever Jet is, just change to another company. Economy will regulate.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:11 PM
2

Cheers!
/r/MensRights29/03/17 12:39 PM
2

Great one! Whats the commentator's name?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 03:09 AM
1

Australian men AND women. Why? Why do you let this happen to your society? Nothing good will emerge out of this! Stand up and push against this bullshit finally for fuck sake! Otherwise it woun't get better it will only get worse. These people are never satisfied. And when they have 50% they will find other means to push their agenda by other means.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:44 AM
5

Amazong!
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:09 PM
7

Imagine the outrage if they would have put that on women's day.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:05 PM
2

the family had 'lost 18 months of their lives' due to the ordeal Could they press compensation charges against the woman?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:32 PM
1

I might have oversimplified the situation a bit, agreed. I do not say that there are no genuine issues a mans-rights movement could and should stand up for. For sure there are. I just say it should be done with the caution of not walking down the same rabbit hole as feminism.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:57 AM
1

I am confused. My point was precisely that I think that criticising feminism and other victimhood cultures is better than subscribing to the same kind of culture. So I am on board with questioning and citicising bloody feminism.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:52 AM
4

I think the MRM splits roughly into two camps: The ones who want to subscribe to the same game of victimhood culture and identity politics as the feminists do for decades. And then there is those who just think that victimhood culture and identity politics is rubbish in general, and who do not want to sign up for it, but rather stand up against the other groups who do. I would count myself into the latter group. I think all this victimhood stuff is bullshit, and I am not interested in playing th…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:59 PM
1

Is it only on Amazon.com? Cannot find it in other countries there.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:45 PM
1

I never once said independently. I only said independent of their mother. Also that does not hold. And again, even when you limit it to life sustaining functionality, you still ignore important questions of, when does the organism become conscious, and when is it able to feel. One, nothing in medicine can be guaranteed with absolute accuracy. In fact, nothing in life can be guaranteed with absolute accuracy. Taking an Advil could kill you. 99.9999999% of the time it won't. You are right about th…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:45 AM
1

Yes, its true. I thought with the total number of professions that might even out. But you are right, stricttly speaking it cannot be followed.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:49 PM
1

This graph also shows a nice overall effect: Think of a diagonal line from top-left to bottom-right. This would divide the sum of all jobs to 50% men and 50% women. But clearly the make % is right of this diagonal in almost the entire graph, which demonstrates that over all MORE MEN WORK THAN WOMEN DO.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:22 PM
2

I agree in principle, but when you look and listen to the cucks in the British parliament, it might still take a while until more hop on board. ; )
/r/MensRights25/02/17 10:10 PM
1

I wouldn't say completely the opposite. They, and especially Gavin, do not want equality. He has the stance that men and women are different, and therefore shouldn't be treated equally. But yes, you are right in that he does not want men to be woman's bitches either.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 04:12 PM
2

Its not a Vice video, its OP taking the piss out of the Vice video.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:53 PM
3

True that. PETA is nothing but a money making propaganda machine.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:43 AM
1

I also have watched the whole conversation, and I cannot read out of the 95% what you do. But anyway. I want you to consider this: I am from Austria. In Austria the legal age of consent is 14. When you are 13 it is legal to have sex as long as the partner is no older as 16. Are we a nation of child abusers? Is Germany one, or Italy, or any other of the developed countries with similar laws, such as also Japan where the legal age of consent is even 13? It is not a crime to talk about these things…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 12:10 AM
6

I think what happened is pretty clear: Milo says a lot of controversial shit. But simply pointing out the things that offend the lefties wouldn't hurt him. So they digged for something where part of the right would turn against him as well. And guess they found it. I definitely think he did not endorse pedophilia. Many statements he made in the interview, such as, what pedophilia actually is, are true. Others are of course controversial, but I think one should at least be allowed to openly discu…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:30 PM
1

And we do protect them, and Milo agreed in the interview with the law. He said the current law and age of consent is about right. So he agrees with what you say.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:23 PM
2

This still doesn't mean that he would have advocated for pedophilia.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:20 PM
1

I've been quite clear where I draw the line. Most western countries draw the line even sooner. I've made my position quite clear, and it's that life starts when the fetus is able to live independent of the mother. So, no, I wouldn't. I acknowledge your opinion. But if you try to take a neutral point of view, you would also have to acknowledge that other people draw the line somewhere else. Consider for example the following: A baby is not even able to live independently once its born. We are mam…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:54 PM
1

A baby's rights do have to be taken into account. But that is not by deciding to give the rights of a baby to something that could eventually become a baby. Using baby colloquially in this regard clouds the picture unnecessarily. A baby is what is born, it is not what exists before birth. Well, I have made my statement neutral, because I know that we all would agree that a baby has rights, but that different people would have a different opinion on when a bunch of cell becomes a baby. As said, I…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:52 PM
1

Agreed, but it doesn't harm to draw parallels where there are such. ; )
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:17 PM
1

If we're talking strictly biology, the male should be providing resources for the female and offspring. Arguing biology is dumb. We are higher beings than sheep. Yes, my point was exactly that one shouldn't counter a non-biological argument with a biological one. So I agree here. (Though in general I believe you cannot dismiss biology in every aspect of social life. We are socially advanced lifeforms, yes, but we are also to a large extend biologically determined. But thats not necessarily the m…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:15 PM
3

Show me where I said it's harmless. Well I might have read too much into it then. Because the "its different" argument usually goes hand in hand with the "fgm is brutal genital mutation, while mgm is just a little snip" attitude. I am happy you don't think like that. Sorry for my bias. So we might not have too different of an opinion after all, just a communication problem. ; )
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:40 AM
2

Oh, pardon me. I am not an English native speaker. Allow me to correct myself: There are different kinds of female genital mutations. And no-one claims its the same. But the generalisation that male genital mutation is harmless, and also that it would not be comparable to certain female genital mutations, is simply wrong. Stating that just shows that one didn't do the homework very carefully.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:03 AM
2

Okay sweetie, love you too.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:44 AM
7

But isn't that problematic that you can just say it, without having to give proof? I am taking this gender neutral now, regardless if its the father or the mother, thats simply bad law. : (
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:21 PM
6

You talk as if "this sub" was a sworn in cult group. I have no connection to any other poster here, I simply state my views and opinion with my best intentions. And yes, maybe I am sometimes wrong, I am just human. Doesn't mean I have some sinister plan to push an agenda. There is no harm in having a civil discussion about any issue. This way we learn from each other.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:58 PM
1

Well if you wanted to make a point then yes. If you don't want to make a point then no.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:54 PM
9

There are many different kinds of female circumcision. There is another guy somewhere here in the answers who summarised that pretty well and gave links to sources.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:41 PM
15

Well good. But it is also already telling a lot that she was able to give the child for adoption without the consent of the biological father in the first place, but that he had to go to court and fight for his child afterwards, and that it had to go up as far as to the supreme court.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:39 PM
8

The risk for women you are talking about here is biologically determined. Its hardly men's fault that thats the case, and if it was changeable by law noone would be against it, but it isn't since it is biology. You can hardly bring this as argument of why in the financial and care taking responsibilities, the woman has more say than the man. I agree that a perfect solution would mean that everyone has maximum rights, and no-one is being abused or punished. But it is hard to balance, since there …
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:51 PM
8

If the mum wants to keep the child and the dad not, the dad has to pay. If the dad wants to keep the child and the mum not, she can give abort or give it away. Of course it is a right the mum has, and the dad not.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:39 PM
19

I think its because this post got front paged.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:36 PM
14

Why? The points are there to demonstrate a case. They are not necessarily meant to take literally. I think its good. Not subtle, but good.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:35 PM
30

It is correct that biological there is no equivalent in terms of pregnancy. But she can not only abort, but she can also give birth, and then has some time to think if she wants to keep the child or not, and if not, she can give it to adoption without having any moral or financial burden. Thats not linked to biology anymore, its simply rights she has, which he has not. He has no say in it whatsoever, and yet has all the financial responsibility, even when the responsibility as a caring father is…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:31 PM
6

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:27 PM
6

This clearly depends on which point you are talking about. In the case of circumcision, yes, of course you are right. As many pointed out this is to see in a satirical sense to make a case anyway. But look at the case of reproductive rights and parenthood, an increase in men's rights would automatically mean that their rights get in conflict with current women's rights, which then consequently have to be lowered or adjusted. At the moment, women can deny their responsibility for parenthood at ev…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:20 PM
1

Well, you got a point there. ; )
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:01 PM
8

Exactly, I mean, if you are a woman and drive a car drunk you are also responsible for when you drive into someone or something. As long as you are a grown-up, it is your own responsibility what you do, and which consequences your actions may have, even though you are drunk, no matter if you are a man or a woman. Why the hell should sex be an exception here?
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:13 PM
1

Unbelievable! A scratch in a car's finish can be fixed with 3000 $, yes. But an incredibly brutal attack with a shattered glass in the face of a man??
/r/MensRights18/02/17 12:49 AM
1

I guess what they really mean is: They are into golden showers, and they feel degraded having to kneel in front of their partner while he pisses in their faces. They would probably feel alright if he kneeled down too while doing it.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 08:00 PM
4

Also, here an article about it in The Guardian: http://archive.is/33pnq
/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:39 AM
2

I do not even think that MGM is legal, at least not in the UK. Afaik its condoned, but actually illegal.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:52 AM
1

So… which university do you plan to escape to? ; )
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:37 PM
15

They only ever bring up biology when they think they can use it for their own cause. But in this case they are just wrong in any case, no matter if their body or not.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:27 AM
4

I think there is actually no doubt that men and women have different purposes by evolution. There is a huge body of research on the differences between the male and female body in general, and especially on the differences between the male and female brains, of different hormon cycles, etc.. To deny this means to deny biological facts - it is like denying reality. And where else should these differences stem from, but from evilution? How much or how little this is relevant for gender roles in mo…
/r/MensRights20/01/17 09:36 PM
4

I suspect that Trump will radicalise more women than I ever could. Here you have it ladies and gentlemen - she is not even hiding her goal of radicalising women.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 09:26 PM
2

Nailed it there.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 03:48 AM
1

Best solution: do both!
/r/MensRights18/01/17 03:46 AM
1

dear lord
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:32 AM
1

Thank you! : )
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:46 PM
3

Would you have a source for that? Sounds like some good amunition against affirmative action defenders.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:25 PM
1

Right, don't know why it wasn't working for me the first time. Maybe I screwed up! ; )
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:22 AM
1

Time stamp? ; )
/r/MensRights10/01/17 12:57 AM
1

Since, as yous say, questions like these come in fairly frequently, shouldn't we make an effort to make a propper sticky an leave it up there?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:34 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:21 PM
3

Got a link to the study or an article on it?
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:16 AM
2

Engineering is a bit different in these regards than the rest of STEM you have to see though.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:09 AM
2

I highly doubt that. But anyway. ; )
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:30 PM
8

So did you even read it? In the United Kingdom and the Crown dependencies, any household watching or recording live television transmissions as they are being broadcast (terrestrial, satellite, cable, or internet) is required to hold a television licence. You can perfectly well have access to live TV. But if you don't use your device for this purpose, you don't have to get a licence either.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:27 PM
2

Bullshit. Read here. You only need one when you watch or record live TV (on whatever device). But you can have internet access and/or a TV, and still don't have to pay, as long as you don't use these to watch or record live TV.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:24 PM
4

Thats not true, I live in the UK, don't watch or record live TV, therefore don't need a licence, and they never bullied me to get one. They only need you to state that you don't require a license, which you can do on their website, and then they leave you alone for a couple of years before they ask, if anything changed.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:22 PM
8

I assume from your spelling that you're at least from North America regardless of where you live now. If so, you may not be aware that if you own a device that can receive live BBC TV broadcasts (which now includes nearly every Internet connected device!) the law requires that you have a TV licence, whether you actually watch BBC or not, under penalty of a £1000 fine at least. So for many, voting with one's wallet simply isn't an option. Thats not correct. You only need the licence if you actual…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:19 PM
1

definitely
/r/MensRights24/12/16 12:14 PM
1

Gotcha.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:54 AM
2

I do not think that many are sadists, but I do think that many have this weird revenge kind of thought in mind, for injustice which may or may not have been done to women in the past. Its of course bullshit to blame todays men for that anyway. But thats how social justice works. Its a fucked up group ideoligy.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:27 AM
20

Kudus to the players for the boycott! Thats what you do in these cases. Not staying silent cowardly, just because it wasn't you who was eaten.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 04:58 AM
1

You a minority? An Anglo-Saxon white male? Oh dear, she missed the point.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:55 PM
1

Again, that doesn't make the article fake news, it might make the headline missleading. Thats all. If you encourage people to used other people's prefered pronouns, then that includes 'ze' as well, unless excluded in particular. Fake news is a completely made up story. What we have here is bad or sloppy journalism at worst, but not fake news. The difference is important, also because of the "boy who cried wolf" effect.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:38 PM
7

No its not. Heatstreat takes into account missleading statements of previous articles, and writes: A statement posted on OUSU’s website said: “In light of the factual inaccuracies published, we would like to highlight that our support for trans students includes respecting neopronouns and non-binary identities. “We would also like to clearly state that we would never tell anyone to use ‘ze’ pronouns instead of ‘he’ or ‘she’ if ‘he’ or ‘she’ is the pronoun someone wishes to use.” The University o…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:24 AM
6

Not defending MGTOW here, but don't you make The Red Pill sound like an ideology yourself?
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 09:46 PM
1

Exactly. I would have been happy to have had a teacher who brings up such interesting topics and corresponding real live examples.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 07:15 PM
2

Canada has fallen guys. What a shame. Such a beautiful country.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 07:11 PM
4

Why is this man being down-voted? He is correct in what he says. Think about the Daily Mail what you want. They are a crack ass newspaper, yes. But at least they dare to publish controversial issues, where BBC and co are pulling out. Thats just how it is. Reading Daily Mail and co, in addition to media like the BBC will actually enrich your views. You should just always be critical about what you read, regardless of the source. If you only focus on supposedly "good" and "unbiased" media, then yo…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 05:08 PM
3

If you are a common joe, then yes, I would agree. But he is not. He pulled down the pants of some of the most powerful governments in the world. Do you really think he would get a fair trial? When things get dicey, then sometimes raising awareness is the only thing you have left.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:59 PM
3

Well I would say it is close enough to give it a place here. It is a man possibly falsely accused of rape. It doesn't matter too much where the accusations came from, and weather or not one of the women is defending him. Also: Because it is a very prominent case, it gets more media coverage. If it turns out he really is inocent, it could really blow up and raise awareness about the bias towards men in such cases. Finally: Even if it turned out that the prosecution was entirely politically motiva…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:53 PM
1

"I also expect that Assange stops violating my client in the media," she said. "She has suffered enough." So what exactly have feelings got to do with it? The point is to find out the truth!
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:48 PM
1

I just think a good balance is key. Both have to give and both have to take. But that doesn't mean that both have to do this in equal ways or in the same situations. Men and women are different. It doesn't help to pretend we are the same. The problem is that modern feminism made women believe that they are both, the same AND different, at the same time. So they are cherry picking and allow theirselves to be different where they benefit from it, and allow theirselves to be equal, again where they…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 03:42 PM
1

Good post there. The trick for finding the right woman is to find one which is, as yourself, not in fear of accepting and respecting differences between men and women. Women are often more emotional and less rational. It doesn't help to deny it. If you can kind of accept it as part of their biology, it makes you understand her better, and it can make an argument with her and forgiving each other afterwards much easier. This is of course not only up to the man, but goes both ways. If she is bitch…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 07:12 PM
2

Thats a pretty wicked law. I mean, how can anyone determine if people just lived together, or were actually engaged in a relationship?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:44 AM
1

Bravo the fuck! Good job student's union! I hope more will follow your example!
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:44 PM
19

Well, as it says in the bottom of the article, because of this fear of being accused of sexism, men's health is sometimes put at risk as well. It was added that in some drugs testing cases, these generalisations may have instead put men’s health at risk. Lazaroids, a rejected stroke treatment, may have worked for men but was deemed as no longer working after being used on both sexes.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:39 PM
8

When social justice faces actual justice. : )
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:20 AM
7

And set up a donation fund for her compensation, and there are indeed idiots who pay in.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:19 AM
2

Ok, sorry didn't know. What diference would it make? Guess I cannot change it anymore, can I?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:52 AM
8

Men, Your Reign Is Over. Michael, Your Brain Is Over.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:19 AM
2

Nice list! Though its missing out on some.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:17 AM
4

Such as Wu Zetian in China over 13 hundred years ago, or Cleopatra in Egypt over 2000 years ago, or Maria Theresia of the Habsburg dominion in the 18th century. ; )
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:10 AM
1

He wrote silly stuff on an incognito account. That not the same as saying it in person. We all have articukated ourselfs more aggressive on the internet than we would do it in real life before. Yes, he was definitely a fool to unveil his identity. But does he deserve that this ends his career? If you ask me, no. And if so, then at least he should have the fair chance to get a hear and explain himself.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:38 AM
1

Wow, thats actually disgusting. : ( Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:56 AM
2

Is there any way we can support him? Any NYU people here sympathising with him who could get something going?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:25 AM
1

They are blaming him on his rhetoric on his twitter account. But at the time he made these tweets he was not making them under his name, but with a hidden identity. And naturally he could make use of other language there to make his point, because he didn't have to fear a witch-hunt.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:23 AM
1

Guess ture. Anyway, I guess the dad and the kid are better of without her anyway - if the father got the kid, that is. (I pledge guilty of not reading the whole story here)
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:20 AM
1

Beautiful! xD
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:18 AM
1

How are women special treated in the UK's justice system? I actually didn't know that.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:10 AM
4

I agree, and I would argue the same is true for racism. People are already openly discriminating men for being men. People are already openly discriminating white people for being white. Who knows how far it will go in five years.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:09 AM
1

If there is anything that gives me hope then it is young little fuckers like this guy nailing it and having the balls to speak out. Great one there!
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:49 AM
3

Is there such a petition currently online?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 05:03 AM
2

Is there any way we can support her?
/r/MensRights23/10/16 05:28 AM
1

Guys, if you post something, please at least tell us in which country things happen.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:55 AM
2

Great answers. Sums it up pretty much!
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:26 AM
1

Very interesting and informative! It is interesting to see the parallels we have in modern society albeit having different cultures. It was a case of, "Shit, crowds are out of control and it's really hard to figure out whether we're persecuting an innocent man or defending an innocent woman." I think you are addressing a key-point here, which is at heart of many social justice problems today, such as rape claims. In many cases it is simply not possible to determine weather rape actually happened…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:30 PM
1

Yep! Group sex in the same way three times just a few days apart! And everytime drunk that she couldn't remember.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:03 AM
1

Interesting, thanks for the data! So what is the argument for those who do it without a religious motivation? I guess nowadays people are just "used" to it somehow. But what was the original motivation?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:07 PM
1

I am just arguing in terms of fairness. No field should want minorities. They should just judge by merit, not by gender or ethnicity. I think the comparison to supply and demand is highly faulty, since capitalism is gender and colour blind.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:05 PM
2

My point was not that there are only 6 in this world. But that they are rare in comparison to the other ones. I am just speaking of my own experience in job hunting. I might have just been unlucky, and may be wrong, sure. But based on my experience thats the only opinion I can form.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:43 PM
1

Oh, makes sense. I am from a nation where its rare, so maybe thats why it didn't click with me. ; ) I am not a lot into this topic: How common is it in the US actually? I thought it was mainly in the jewish community. But guess I am wrong.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:26 AM
1

Agreed! : )
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:15 AM
1

So women apparently need to pay so much for products related with menstruation. So what? I need to buy razor blades for a shit load of money. Jesus! How far dies it go.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 11:51 PM
1

What are his options for being compensated for this? I have no clue really, but my guts tell me that if she is even protected by the law to stay anonymous, while his name is blamed forever, my guts tell me that the chances to get compensation are fairly low. But I am no expert by any means though.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:49 PM
4

But what would a troll achieve with this question?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:41 PM
12

What an Idiotic Ideological Control Freak! Thats exactly what she is. It always makes me happy when a kid is actually more capable of critical thinking than their parent who just wants to brainwash it.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:39 PM
1

Hang on a second? Why the hell would women like it better?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:21 PM
1

But I still wouldn't say its equally his fault than her's.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:14 PM
2

Why exactly is it so important actually?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 04:05 PM
1

I think eve scholarships for study are not okay. You give one person more chances than another, just because she has a vagina, and the other one a penis. That is sexist and discriminating. There might be a guy, who wants to go into STEM, but needs a scholarship in order to afford it. Yes, there are other scholarships, no questions, but there MORE fore women than for men. So you don't treat them equally, one group has an advantage over the other. And the advantage is much bigger since the women h…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 04:04 PM
1

Would be great! However it would never get to the interview :/
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:56 PM
1

You are damn right mate! And the fact that things like these still get enforced, even in schools with STEM subjects, where people should be capable of logical reasoning, is just sad and mindblowing.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:52 PM
2

I have my theory to that. Most people in university staff are strategic players. STEM is a highly competitive field, so if you want to do, say, research in STEM, you have the best chances if you are (a) good in what you do, and (b) play the game. Since university polocies are already deeply infiltrated by braindead equality and diversity ideology, that is what they will repeat. If one day the paradigm changes, they would just change their opinion straight away. They are all flags in the wind. On…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:49 PM
2

Exactly! Or they are babysitted through their degree, and once they hit the job-market the real world punches in their faces.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:44 PM
1

I hear you bro, am in STEM too, and on the job market in a few months, starting to look for jobs now, and this is getting really frustrating.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:42 PM
12

Haha, you are my hero bro! xD A shame you didn't tape it, would have loved to see her face while reading it. I hope it will not have consequences for you. Is it at university? I think you make the key point in the end: In fighting all this crap we really need to stop caring that someone could eventually be offended. It took me a long time to realise that, since I wanted to be a nice guy, but its the only way. There are too many ways in which you could offend someone today, and it gets more and m…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:37 PM
8

So.. this is as much his fault as hers. Comeon man! Yes, he could have handled the situation much better, no question. But if she was the one hitting him first, and continuing to hit him even though he stayed calm, then how on earth can you say its AS MUCH his fault? If it was the other way around, and anyone would come up with the idea that it was both their fault equally, the world would be outraged! They would scream "victim blamer" an crucify the guy who says that.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:29 PM
1

If there are many social justice posters, people at your school could participate in Prof Jordan Peterson's Pokemon PC game. One more thing about your club: If it is a high-school, you could also try to win some parents for you. Maybe that would also help at university, but there probably not so much, since students are of course grown ups; or lets say, nowadays not so much anymore, but in the official system they are.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:26 PM
7

Please give us a bit more context mate. When and where did this happen? Did you film it, or where is it from? What happened afterwards; how did this story pan out, if it did yet? Did it go to court? Is there a full length version of the video? There is a part missing in the middle.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:16 PM
2

I also just watched it. It is really interesting! Thanks for sharing! He even mentions in his talk, that sometimes countries go down this patch on their own, without Soviet (at that time) influence. So if influenced or not. There are so many parallels to what happened in western society in the last 30 years or so. There seems to be someting to this theory indeed!
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:12 AM
2

True that mate.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:34 AM
1

Because that would stop the poor rape victims from coming out, and you know how hard it is for women (yes, ONLY women) to come out. /s
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:18 AM
9

Exactly, and this is why everyone in school and university should be taught about the philosophy of science. Then they could eventually differ between things like science and religion.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:14 AM
2

While I agree with you, I still think its good to expose them, and if only for the sake of showing the world what kind of cunts they really are.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:02 AM
1

Alright hoaxes should of course not be supported. Thanks for clarifying! I just say things from my experience. I am in STEM as well. I can still see the post though. Not removed for me.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:36 AM
2

Could or couldn't be, but the existence of many female only scholarship is fact. And it is also fact that job advertisements at universities more often than not state that they especially welcome applications from women or underrepresented ethnic groups, clearly indicating a racial and sexist bias in the application process.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:13 AM
2

Or you could just let people choose their subject by their own interests, instead of luring them with money.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:39 AM
1

If you speak out, noone gives you backup. If someone does, then only in the locker-room. I still sometimes speak out, but I think my chances to get a job my branche after I graduate are already lower than when I would have shut my mouth all the time. The problem is the lack of organisation. People need to goup up and stand up against this shit. The involvement if university staff would also be very helpful. I am too close to graduating now to get something going. But the younger students really …
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:36 AM
1

Shit, they don't even try to hide that crap, do they? No, they call it "affirmative action" and they think it is a necessary mechanism to promote "underrepresented" minority groups. I could puke.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:32 AM
4

Let me quote what u/duhhhh wrote somewhere else here: Earlier this year courts in Canada overruled a scholarship a doctor setup in his will. The scholarship was for heterosexual non-feminist whites with preference given for men in science or engineering. It was thrown out for being sexist and racist. I doubt a gay, black, or feminist scholarship would have been brought to court or had its requirements overruled by a judge. And the source provided by u/Ailer http://news.nationalpost.com/news/cana…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:24 AM
2

Is that a thing?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:21 AM
3

Wow, really a total of six? Amazing! There should neither be a men only nor a female only. Thats sexist and bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:20 AM
1

The problem is sexism.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:11 AM
1

I am more optimistic these days. I think people are starting to stay up against it. I hope we get something going!
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:11 AM
5

Are you a man? Then your feelings mean shit mate!
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:09 AM
6

Please write an application stating that. You would be a saint. ; )
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:04 AM
6

They think men are priviledged, and there is no need. Women and ethnic minorities have it so much harder they say.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:03 AM
3

You are absolutely right, this is a disaster and it needs to be fought! It is blunt sexism. And what really irritates me is that even otherwise intelligent and logically thinking academic staff is completely fine with it, yes, even defend these measures. In our department there was one Prof who would sometimes speak up against these things, and he would always earn a shitstorm from th erest of the department. They are all flags in the wind. If the direction changes one day, they will change thei…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:02 AM
3

You are absolutely right, this is a disaster and it needs to be fought! It is blunt sexism. And what really irritates me is that even otherwise intelligent and logically thinking academic staff is completely fine with it, yes, even defend these measures. In our department there was one Prof who would sometimes speak up against these things, and he would always earn a shitstorm from th erest of the department. They are all flags in the wind. If the direction changes one day, they will change thei…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:01 AM
2

I remember, I think it was about two years back, when I was driving on the motorway, I listen to a discussion about the case in the radio. That was the time where there was the big discussion if he should ever be allowed to play professional football again. People could call and state their opinions. Almost everyone who called was stating that they do think he should be allowed for one or both of two reasons: (1) It might have been a false accusation (2) He was in jail, and did his time there, s…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:55 PM
1

Found my new favourite pornstar! Because of her intellect AND her breasts.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 11:09 PM
1

BBC for example
/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:42 PM
1

Didn't get that either. But maybe I don't know enough about the sports.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:17 PM
1

That for example: harassment of male vs female gets into the prime time news, whilst harassment of female vs male not.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:10 PM
1

No, I cannot proof it, but just take a look at which cases blow up in the media, and which don't.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:47 PM
1

Haha, love you man! Have a nice trip…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:54 AM
2

The double standard in public acceptance if it happens t a white male or to any other gender/ethnicity is normal, not the action itself.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:35 AM
1

Not the action itself, but the difference in public acceptance if it is against a white male, as opposed to the public acceptance if it is against any other gender or ethnicity, is a thing. Its the double standard which is normal.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:34 AM
3

Agreed, I don't believe in the UK you would have any chances either. The double standard is what pisses me off.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:31 AM
2

Thats right! Everyone is dividing social groups by things which can be judged by the cover? Men, women, blacks, whites, etc.. But actually, who talks about poor people? Noone! Noone gives a crap, even though this is something which undeniably has a huge social impact on a persons life, far far more than any gender or ethnicity question.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:26 AM
1

Thats simply wrong, please have a look in a dictionary. Priviledge has the clear meaning of being advantaged over others, not that others are disadvantaged over you. This might seem like a tomato vs tomato thing here, but I think this is precisely the reason why many people do not want to accept this term in this use. If you really mean what you say, then why call it priviledge in the first place? It only triggers misunderstandings and misue. Speak for example of disadvantage where it is present…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:18 AM
2

I have too little insight into the racism issues in the US to debate with you here. Racism is bad, no question. If black people are oppressed in the US, which I have no way to judge if they are or not, then it should be fought of course. But racism should not be answered by racism. If you do that, you make the same mistake in the other direction. And worse: you will polarise, and white people who were not racist before might actually become racist, because they will not understand why there is s…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:04 AM
2

I said "as far as I can judge". I think I cannot formulate it more humble than that. And besides that, I have lived in three different places in two different western countries so far. And my workplace is not only international, but also gets me to interact with a lot of people worldwide, most, but not only, from western countries. No, that doesn't mean I am right. But I didn't claim to be, I just said "as far as I can judge".
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:56 PM
2

Online you need to differ between trolling and actual threats. Actual threats are extremely rare. In addition to that, it is important to note that both, trolling and actual threats happen to both, men and women, and are exercised by both, men and women. It is not only a men vs women thing. I never claimed that many women behave like the lady in the video. What I was talking about is the public accaptence of when it happens, and contrary, the outrage when it happens to a person of different sex …
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:47 PM
2

Exactly mate! Happy you see it this way. Equality all the way man. If one prays it, should should live up to it!
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:45 PM
2

Sounds interesting! Would you have a link? : )
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:43 PM
4

It exists everywhere in western society as far as I can judge. In some countries more, in others less, for a variety of reasons.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:57 PM
0

Now I really have to disagree here. When have you ever heard about a case in the media, where racism was committed to a white, or sexism to a man? In the rare cases when these do get reported on the media, it has not the same effect in the public either. The victimised groups get upset over the complaint, and feel offended.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:55 PM
-7

Its not normal that it happens to you on a daily basis, thankfully. But the public acceptance, if it happens to someone, is normal. If it happens to a black person, for instance, people are outraged. Its the double standard which is a problem.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:20 PM
201

"Let us not judge a man by the colour of his skin but by the content of his heart." - Martin Luther King Very wise words, sadly often forgotten or misinterpreted and abused today. He would be spinning in his grave if he knew what political correctness has become today.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:16 PM
1

Actually in the western world, the one who claims is supposed to be the one who has to bring the evidence.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:23 PM
3

Comeon man, I say stuff like that with my buddies all the time, doesn't mean I actually do what I say! I know it, my buddies know it, everyone knows it. Words are words. And I want to add .that I personally give a fuck about both, Trump and Hillary. I am not even American. I have no political motivation here
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:22 PM
1

You missed my point, which was that: because of too many unserious claims, people stop to take claims serious. Serious or not, thats whats happening, and thats why even feminists should fight fake claims, since it is bad for women! "The boy sho cried wolf", you know.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:16 PM
15

Indeed, its that predictable already. Its just a question of time until no-one believes them anymore when they blame a famous person. Sad thing about that is, that no-one will believe serious claims anymore either.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:50 AM
3

My god, from all this news from Canada, as a European you get the feeling this is the most dangerous country out there! Universities are rape facilities, the streets are full of violence against women. My god, this country is really going down the shitter! I am really suprised, because you know what? Over here in Europe Canada has the reputation to be one of the most liberal and open minded countries out there. Perhaps too liberal? Perhaps some cunts simply became too greedy and abuse the open m…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:58 AM
1

Even though the "other women's" point of view is much saner than that of the feminist, I still think that it is not necessarily a problem to have an overall pay-gap. It is a choices gap in my opinion, and we should leave people with their choices.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:44 AM
3

To the hair cut: Its in most cases more complex and time consuming, plus, women want all kind of extra creams and what not in their hair. Thats the one thing. The other thing is that women generally give more crap about getting a haircut, and go more offen -> more demand -> higher price. Its simply open market, supply and demand, which regulates the price. I mean, do they seriously think there is a conspiracy behind or what? If you think the haircut is too expensive at one store, then go to anot…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:37 AM
13

Right! Its called free market. Supply and demand regulate the price. I never ever had an economy class in my life, and even I get it. Its not a freaking conspiracy!
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:28 AM
3

Agreed. So good to see a Prof having the fucking balls to speak sanity.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:58 AM
2

This, and it is about stopping HR stuff from exercising affirmative action in hiring.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:54 AM
5

I disagree. It is about diversity trainings, where HR stuff gets brain washed in terms of affirmative action. Hence its clearly connected to the men's rights issue of afirmitive action being a mechanism favouring women over men.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:53 AM
34

Yep. Right decision.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:03 PM
7

Sure! Doesn't make it less discriminating though. Imagine, if you would do the same the other way around!
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:28 PM
4

Please send it! You can see the Email address in the screenshot. ; )
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:27 PM
2

Thanks for sharing her Email address! :))
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:25 PM
11

If she doesn't even have the guts to admit that she was wrong, and leaves this guy now in danger of being hunted down by white nights, then she is the one who deserves to be publicly shamed. Was there any wider media coverage over this in Australia? I mean big newspapers, or TV channels? If not so, is it worth a try to contact them?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:21 PM
1

Thanks for explaining! : ) Internal or external, now women value intrinsic motivation more than men. This actually develops in childhood based on gender roles and biological components. It would be cool if you could link to some research about this. This could be really useful for people in this sub.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:11 PM
2

How is demanding a high five a harassment in the first place?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:57 AM
1

Wouldn't it be much smarter to have a separate baby changing room, where mum and dad can go in with the baby??
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:53 PM
1

That makes me just sad.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:44 PM
2

Now this is a problem that will be becoming bigger and bigger. I assume that the justice systems in most countries are not prepared for cases like that. It is probably nowhere defined if this is child abuse or not, simply because when making the laws, no-one ever thought about that society would once become so nuts that this is actually open for debate. No kid should be put in a gender role like that! I do know too little about it. But I am pretty sure that neural sciences could outline here tha…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:38 PM
12

Now thats interesting. In this case it should be made a bigger deal. Thats discriminating as fuck! Imagine folks, if the gender roles were reversed there…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:16 PM
2

Thats interesting. Now you made me curious: Now I should mention if girls were involved in the learning game they are playing they would struggle due to their nature and how they perceive information. Why is that? I do not say you are wrong, I am just interested! Could you get a bit more into detail please?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:11 PM
2

Very good speech! I would have loved to see the faces of the audience. EDIT: I have just watched the whole speech, which is linked in the info of the video on youtube. Its highly recommendable! All of it is very good. Not only her arguments, but also how she bring them.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:14 AM
2

Ah, a herpes hub! Guess its more like a virology experiment than a social one here.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:45 PM
7

Troll or not, I don't care. There is no shame in giving an honest answer, which is: You can of course not generalise this! Everyone will have a different taste. I strongly doubt there is any correlation between sympathising with men's rights, and taste in women for a man, appart from from: not a feminist of course. Also don't forget that there are many straight female MRAs, and gay male MRAs, who definitely do not go for any kind of woman. So no offense, but: what kind of question is that?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:40 PM
8

Very good video! Should be shared.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:28 PM
1

I think if the anti-feminists or mra groups would coordinate activities like this, they could reach plenty, or at least, get huge media coverage and raise awareness.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:48 PM
10

Does this really belong here guys? Its dirty campaigning in politics, yes, but not necessarily a men's rights issue here I would say.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:38 PM
23

I mean appart from the fact that his post was harmless anyway. Even if he knew that she was a computer scientist, it could still be that she is not deep into Java. Probably every computer scientist touches any of the big languages during their education, but it doesn't mean they really have to get deep into it. I mean, there are computer scientists which are more into hardware than into coding for example. Same in other branches. I bet that every physicist nowadays has some understanding of quan…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:24 PM
1

Sounds good man, would love to see some pictures of the rice farm. But understand its privacy. : ) Enjoy your retirement!
/r/MensRights08/10/16 04:12 AM
3

Yep! I thought the same. My girlfriend is Chinese. She has an economics degree and has a good job. What the hell is this users problem. Are all asian women sluts in her eyes, or what is she trying to infer?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 04:05 AM
6

He deserves a sentence, no question. But wishing him to be raped? Thats just terrible. We live in a civilised world, so I hope.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:25 PM
3

The standard argument once again, "there are less women in Physics then men. How is that equality", completely ignoring the possibility that women on average are simply less interested in science then men. Its called freedom of choice! But no, just because statistics needs to be polished we need to give those women who actually are interested in STEM a massive advantage over their peer male colleagues. It makes me sick! Other question: Milo who? I fail to catch his full name at the introduction.…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:30 AM
1

I do not dare to click on this, but I think it is quite an old case already. I believe I remember having seen this years ago. Shocking still.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:27 AM
3

My god, doesn't it hurt to have a brain fabricating such giant bullshit? […] the STEM syllabi explored in this study demonstrated a view of knowledge that was to be acquired by the student, which promotes a view of knowledge as unchanging. You call it realism. And yes, every actual science kind of assumes a given reality. Without this assumption it is not really possible to do science at all. […] that knowledge is constructed by the student and dynamic, subject to change as it would in a more fe…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:53 AM
1

Shit like this makes me mad. The western society is all about free speech? I laugh my fucking ass off!
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:57 AM
1

Women's dating profiles are usually just a list of demands. Yep, also sums up my experience.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:33 AM
1

I've been around modern American academia enough to tell you that there are a lot of SJW professors who will assume this young man is a rapist and find some pretext for failing him even if he's an excellent student. Yep. And of the ones who are not SJWs, there are enough white nights, who feel they have to protect, you know.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:59 PM
1

So its not only the ethnicity, but it needs to be a migrant. Holy crap thats even more ridiculous! Joke on the side: So your friend is a BBC and applied to the BBC? ; )
/r/MensRights06/10/16 12:37 PM
3

Thanks a lot! I really hope the BBC will get called out on these issues every time they happen. After all the BBC inherits the probably most recognised news agency in the world. If they want to maintain this reputation, they should better stop their social bias.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:58 PM
7

Does someone have a link to a report of the BBC advertising jobs for minorities only? If thats the case that should be made a bigger deal indeed!
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:44 PM
8

Thanks for sharing! Very good speech, and also answers at the Q&A in the end indeed! I would be interested in her opinion on affirmative action to even out apparent gender (or ethnicity) imbalances on the cost of fairness and equality for the ones who are not part of a so called "underrepresented groups" – e.g. female only grants in science and technology. Does anyone know where she stands in regard to this question? Also one comment to the organisers, since they seem to do more events like this…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:37 PM
29

[The court]…Is an independent body and must make a decision based solely on the evidence before it. It cannot be swayed by emotion or public opinion. After the preliminary injunction, this Court was deluged with emails resulting from an organized campaign to influence the outcome. These tactics, while perhaps appropriate and effective in influencing legislators or officials in the executive branch, have no place in the judicial process. This is basic civics, and one would think students and othe…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:41 PM
2

It was a bit unfortunate that she had the last word, where she tried to softened the feminist's point of view, stating that it was only a couple of extremists praying hate against men, and that the idea of feminism was just trie equality. Anyway, the people who are critically thinking should have seen in the speech that she was full of shit as well, and by no means supported true equality. The people who are not critically thinking might be lost anyway…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:31 AM
2

Reverse racism does not exist. You cannot be racist against a white person. Holy shit! That this opinion is actually becoming the doctrine is frightening. The same argument you hear over and over with sexism.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:10 AM
3

Would be brilliant. Unfortunately they will already have enough braindead volunteers for this job.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:51 AM
7

I would boycott it anyway. They wount throw freshers out because of missing this crap.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:50 AM
7

This, and also, you could do the same statistics about men too.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:49 AM
1

So this persons taste in men and men's clothes is law or what? I wear what I want, end of story! What is this magazine even about?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:20 PM
1

Oh yes, fuck the men and boys, the will be fine! /s
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:14 PM
76

The same Elon Musk who was sexually harassed by a woman in the Q&A session of his presentation? Holy shit, how can you just be so full of shit to make up such an article? I mean, there must be some sort of creativity going on there, but not in a good way, not at all! I guess the good thing about that is that articles like that will show the world how incredible bananas this whole victimisation movement has gone already – and with "the world" I mean the part of the population which is rational th…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:09 PM
2

Glad our fellow bloke actually had a backbone! ; )
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:58 PM
6

Mark, speaking as as fellow bloke, you just gotta be so careful about… Yes, and thats yet another problem! You cannot even address real issues anymore because someone will find a way to feel harassed and offended!
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:45 PM
1

For things which are based on statistics and assumption thats actually ok. It is of course necessary to specify what defines the boundaries to be scientific. But giving a range is in some sense already better than giving a single value.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:10 PM
3

What is /r/CringeAnarchy about?
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:08 PM
8

So is he inferring that being a porn-star is something bad? Did it ever come to his mind that porn-stars generally do the job because they want to do it? By demonising that, he is actually the one who looks down on women!
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:44 PM
4

Thats the point. It is good that they apparently are also there for men. But then the name should change to a gender neutral name as well. This way also automatically more men would be aware of the infrastructure.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:40 PM
0

Where did he load it up? The video is not on his channel I suppose. A link to the original would be appropriate.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:35 PM
2

This is really a shame. I once have been banned from /r/Europe for five days, but got a message telling me I could ask about the circumstances by replying, so I did. It turned out it was a mistake, and I was not banned at all. It is bad enough they silence you for having an opinion which is not in line with their ideology. But that they don't even find it worthy to give a reason is the worst.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:45 PM
31

What was the reason for removing your post? If they did not give any, aks the mods. They should at least explain theirselves. On the topic: You are right! It could have ended differently. You could have been the ones who could have ended up being kicked out for no reason, and further more, your boyfriend could have gotten in serious trouble without actually having done anything. This is precicely the problem, and it needs to be addressed. I am happy you made this observation, and made your thoug…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:33 PM
2

Right, which is why she is able to judge from a wider and neutral perspective! : )
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:08 PM
2

I also agree that collecting evidence and reporting to school and/or police would be good. If you feel uncomfortable in your own home because of someone else there needs to be something done. It cannot stay like that. An eye witness who is on your side would also be good. If there is ever a good buddy with you, quote him as an eye witness when you report it. Better talk to him about that before though. You do not want him to turn his back on you in the wrong moment. EDIT: That all being said: Ke…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:31 PM
3

I thought it already went nuts, but TIL it can always go more nuts! People in cali should protest against this. If this spreads to other states and countries then good night ladies and gentlemen!
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:20 PM
2

I like his style. Him palying the drunk guy makes it funny and easier to digest, yet he conters all the bullshit with plain logical reasoning. On other videos I sometimes get frustrated with this topic. This one made me laugh.^
/r/MensRights02/10/16 11:02 PM
1

Sorry, must have missed that! Thanks for pointing out! : )
/r/MensRights02/10/16 10:00 PM
37

The problem he is going to face is, that he was not literally fired, but his contract was not extended. It is still disgusting that the reason for that seems to have been his race and sex though. But it will be harder to reach something than if he was actually fired before his contract ran out.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:49 PM
1

Thats exactly my experience as well.^
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:55 PM
2

I get your point. I am just skeptic it will work out fine. ; )
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:47 PM
3

I am not sure if it should be build up again. In my opinion gender and minority studies will always be polarising, and in the end cause more harm then they do good. EDIT: I mean one of the problems which automatically arises is the following: Say you get a degree in women's studies. Then afterwars what do you do? Your job chances will be highly limited, and people will just blow up issues again to create the illusion for the need of a big lobby, which then of course creates lots of work places. …
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:37 PM
10

Good to hear! It is a disgrace anyway, that these disciplines have effectively been given the status of a "science" in the first place. Time this gets reversed.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:35 PM
81

No, we have both sides of the story: A BBC spokesperson said: “While the Government's new charter for the BBC does set us diversity targets, we always hire presenters on merit. “We’d like to thank Jon Holmes for his contribution, but our comedy shows are constantly evolving and it was simply time to create opportunities for new regulars when The Now Show returns this autumn." The first paragraph contains the thing: How do you want to judge presenters purely on merit, if you have reach your diver…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:32 PM
1

Does anyone have a link to quoted speech by Davies? Is it his speech in parliament at international men's day 2015?
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:25 PM
3

I think the brainwashed generation is just lost. But we can still try to convince the undecided, and the new generations.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:19 AM
1

Are the signatures public? I kind of want to avoid my workplace to be able to check me out.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:18 AM
8

I did not find a solution to this problem yet. I think the problem is that they grow up with these ideas. I think at this point all we can do is to finally start standing up against it. We need to put an alternative point of view out there, and win the people with better arguments. This is hard, since so many are just brain washed, but its all we can do.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:05 AM
23

Ironically what she is doing is typically drama queen.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:56 AM
5

Sums it up pretty much.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:55 AM
1

I am sure these things have their right to be discussed, but I am not sure if this is the place for it. Most of the video has nothing to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:28 PM
2

You took one for the team bro! ; )
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:08 PM
2

While thats right, I say it is even more reason to actually do it.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:07 PM
3

I would be with you bro! A public demo would be in order. Schottland, London, wherever mate, I am there!
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:07 PM
-2

Not a good idea I think. "commited to minors" nowadays could also mean a man commiting a crime to a woman. Yes, if it is a terrible crime, a sentence is legit. But it can be abused. We all now how "rape" is not always actual rape for example.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:01 PM
1

To be honest, I know too little about early feminism, but I would assume that in first wave feminism, there actually have been individuals standing up for real equality. It just went bananas later on, and no-one ever stood up against it. Interestingly enough, amongst the few who stand up against them, there are quite a few first wave feminists, who can no longer support their former own camp, because it has nothing to do anymore with what they were initially fighting for.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:20 PM
2

I would choose "shitlord" as my pronoun. ; )
/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:46 AM
1

Right. Same problem with laws for rape victims. They may have had good intentions in the twisted mind of the creator. But these people never even thought about how they could be abused.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:52 AM
2

I like to call them gender-nazis.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:44 AM
7

You are absolutely right there! Judge the person, not the gender, ethnicity, etc.! @OP, you are very welcome here! If feminists look down at you for "betraying" them, then you know that they have no open mind whatsoever. It is not worth it to make yourself feel bad because of narrow minded gender nazis.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:07 AM
1

Good thing the woman had it on tape. Hope the guy didn't get in trouble.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:33 AM
1

Holy sh*t, so best is actually to throw the condom into the fire right afterwards - just for savety.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:23 AM
2

the problem with logical arguments and common sense is just, that the opposite site sadly is not able to process that.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:17 AM
3

Your username doesn't match you bro, good thought there! ; )
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:16 AM
2

That must be the exception though.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:15 AM
0

Which country does this apply to? And if not UK, is there an equicvalent in the UK?
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:14 AM
4

Its becoming more and more. The problem is that the feminists already have their roots deep in the education system. The comparison with propaganda is acutally a very good one. Thats exactly what it is, and I fear if men, and especially young men don't start to stand up, they might be successfull with their brainwashing and we can trash our next generations - and they will trash us.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:08 AM
5

Did they give any reason why it was removed? I am in STEM, and I hear you bro! All these women-only grants and "we specifically welcome application by underrepresented solcial groups such as women, ethnic minorities, etc. ...". It really frustrates me. Good job for speaking up!
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:06 PM
3

I agree by 100%! And also: we should all get the exact same shirt as this ESA guy and wear it in protest! Why didn't I have the idea back when it happened.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:01 PM
1

Oh my god. It seems like the stone-age intelect also still exists today. Gender studies are a bit like religion: They spin their ideas and theories, without any intend to provide proof.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:53 PM
28

She will just get the gear mate. We will keep you in memory. ;P
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:49 PM
3

Good to have your support fellow!
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:41 AM
0

Its actually the white man. F*ck I am screwed!
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:36 AM
2

I literally read the whole thing from top to bottom. Sean is just arguing by plain logic and common sense, while all the braindead sjw zombies smash down the usual phrases, such as "…and if… then you are part of the problem!". They lack any logic or common sense, are full of double standards, and actual sexism. Great to see a celebrity stand up for what is right by reasonable measures of justice and fairness! @Sean Lennon: I didn't even know you exist until today, but you got a new fan now!
/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:34 AM
3

As a scientist, it disgusts me how "gender sciences" claims to have the status of a science already. It is just a bunch of brainwashed idiots circle-jerking down their twisted ideology. It has absolutely nothing to do with science.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:59 AM
1

It just shows how stupid male politicians are that allow women like this to influence laws. Yes, male and female politicians though.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:58 AM
3

Exactly! Taking provocation as an excuse for domestic violence? Holy crap! This story should really be a much bigger deal. The double standard here is way too intense to just forget about it and move on.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:59 AM
2

Same here.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:47 AM
2

Could someone please link this quote in the speech? As a non-murican I really do not want to watch the whole debate^
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:29 AM
10

I can hear him. I feel this social bias all the time. I sometimes go to sit in the park around the corner from my flat. There is a playground, and I like to sit there watching the kids. It simply gives me joy to watch them play. That doesn't mean I am a fucking pedo. Yet people give me the suspicious looks all the time.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 02:06 AM
1

I just want to add here, that it would be really helpful if the country would be mentioned when statistics are quoted. This is very important when one wants to bring up statistics!
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:57 AM
1

More than ever…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:49 AM
7

He is a freaking hero for going through this! He did not fail at all! He reached a lot! This world needs more of his kind!
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:46 AM
-1

Alright, makes sense to me.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:04 AM
2

Depends. Is it normal to have classes like that gender separated? I thought it was perfectly fine to have them mixed, no?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:59 PM
1

I can see both sides: Yes, if I was the guy, and wanted to sit, I would have just asked. Also, if I was the woman, I would have put my bag away, and offered. Anyway. We should not blow this up, as we did not see enough to say she was actually rude, or just didn't pay attention. And as you say, could be the dude was just feeling to stand.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 03:02 AM
1

I am really interested in this too. Where can I get a digital copy?
/r/MensRights26/09/16 02:32 AM
1

Hear hear! I wish everyone would think like you! Well spoken!
/r/MensRights23/09/16 10:23 PM
1

I placed a counter argument, you just didn't agree with it. Which is fine.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:46 PM
1

I do understand what you say. I just do not agree with this way of an analysis. If the purpose is to clear up misinformation, then I believe that this goal is probably not reached at the target audience, who bases their opinion on this misinformation. It might just go the other way around. Anyway. I guess we won't arrive at a consensus here, so lets leave it. ; )
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:41 PM
1

Again: Of course during the majority of evolution, and for most species, the purpose of sex is reproduction. But with humans and other species, such as gibbons, it also serves social aspects, not only reproduction. She is talking about mating strategies. And in my opinion it is simply flawed to factor out the social aspects here, especially because it is apples and pears. It doesn't matter that the reason, why I am a horny bastard, evolutionary comes from the need of reproduction for a species. …
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:10 PM
1

Because she focused on sex for the evolutionary purpuse of reproduction only. We live in a society where sex mainly serves other purposes, and yes, ALSO the reproduction purpose. If you factor these things out, you just make men appear like the most primitive animals. And if you want to focus on anmilas except humans, then there are also examples, like gibbons, where sex has social aspects. You would have to focus on a species.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 09:32 AM
4

True that. But that would be the end of social justice war, and they would need to seek a new hobby / ideology. ; )
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:45 AM
10

In social justice war, they call it "red flag", not foul. ; ) I am not in American politics, but I totally agree with what you say!
/r/MensRights22/09/16 09:47 AM
1

Its even worse! In my work environment the in-line opinion is that they need special treatment - everyone is perfectly fine with giving them an edge. And if you think differently, as I do, you are getting misinterpreted and branded as a patriarch. Then you are told that you cannot discuss these issues in the workplace. And you might even loose your friends, who now hate you just because you have a different opinion. Its the same with diversity issues as well, not only gender.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 09:41 AM
1

You nail it there man! Sadly the majority of people in this world (including most academics) aren't capable of plain logical thinking, and reasoning by common sense anymore. At least not when it comes to these issues.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:44 PM
1

If you ask me, ANY advantage is too much. Equality is what they pray. Equality is what they deserve, not more and not less!
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:37 PM
2

The problem is that the issue issue is pre-university and while there are a few nominal outreach programs in place universities can only do a limited amount about schools and colleges. This doesn't justify the actions being taken. You cannot just see the big picture in terms of the percentage, and then correct it by brute force, ignoring the fact that there are generations of men not having fair chances.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:35 PM
2

This, and also: "Investigating" is something else than taking measures or preferable taking women over men. This is simply not fair, and a major injustice no-one seems to care about. You cannot just see the big picture in terms of the percentage, and then correct it by brute force, ignoring the fact that there are generations of men not having fair chances. Investigating is fine. Injustice is not!
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:32 PM
1

Cheers for the research! Was probably wrong then, or had a non-reliable source. ; )
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:15 AM
1

I cannot see the connection to men's rights here really...
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:31 AM
2

How can someone just tell such enormous bull-crap? And even more shocking: How can this person get such positive comments? Is the world going braindead or what?
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:12 AM
2

I hear you bro. I am shocked how far it already got. If we take your example here: Of course its not wrong to support poor Maori kids. But as soon as they have an edge over others, there is something wrong with this system. Racism goes both ways. People became blind to that.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 10:38 PM
1

Oh sorry, I misunderstood! Thanks for clarification!
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:06 PM
2

Is the court process still ongoing? I would be interested in how it all panned out in court.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 04:52 PM
1

Sorry, I am not an English native. With "more to say" I rather meant: "if they could make the rules".
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:51 PM
2

Thanks for sharing! It is very good. They just hit the mark with everything they say. If these people had more to say, we would live in a better world indeed.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 11:33 PM
1

I did not want to talk in terms of numbers, and in fact I do not know about the accurate statistics here. I did not intend to generalise, and also not to deamonise. But because women nowadays are often biased as being innocent and victims, I thought it is worth highlighting some cases, where this clearly is not the case. (Or in this case, both is the case actually). If it really does not belong here, the mods may remove it.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 09:58 PM
2

I know. What I mean is: sadly nowadays rape is not necessarily rape. Say if both partners were drunk, and had consensual sex. The women might just change her mind the next day, or later, and decide she was raped.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 12:58 AM
2

I understand that. I just thought that unfortunately both is the case: The laws and workplace conduct codes having that bias AND feminism becoming more popular.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 05:50 PM
1

Is feminism becoming less popular though? My feeling is it gets worse and worse with it.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:25 PM
1

And if so, what exactly did he do?
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:16 PM
4

Haha, that makes sense. What a big difference a tiny "o" can make. ; ) Cheers for pointing out.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:07 PM
1

This guy is great. The fact that he is Puerto Rican allows him to just repel so many false accusation immediately. Love it.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:39 AM
1

The power of brainwashing. Also: this guy probably just wants to satisfy his viewers appetite. Could even be he doesn't even believe his own bullshit. Maybe he does. Who knows.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:35 AM
1

It also shows physical violence against a woman. But its ok, since it comes from another woman.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:03 AM
13

Yes, good to see that brain washing can lose to intelect! EDIT: Really, I was downvoted? Just to get sure it was no misunderstanding. I meaned: The brain washing of the mum to their sons, lost to the intelect of the sons.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:00 AM
1

Haha, thanks man. ; ) I know now what it is, the other guy clarified.^ I am just not an English native, and not used to all these acronyms.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:40 AM
1

Wow! I get the impression that in Canada it is the worst with neo-feminism. Why is that? Because Canada is traditionally liberal, so activists like them had an easy way to screw the system?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:36 AM
1

What is dv?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:30 AM
1

To be fair, they would probably laugh at these names just equally. Especially "Men's Support Circle" is not a good idea I think, because you can make it sound like only men are supported while women are on their own. (even though we all know its vice versa these days) "Men's Meetup" leaves blank what the group is all about. So it is easier for feminists to claim that it is a lobby for patriarchy. I think it is a good idea to just call it "Men's Rights Group". After all thats what it is about. An…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:25 AM
24

I remember a few months back I was approaching the queue at the counter in the supermarket. A woman left her kid in the buggy to go grab something in the rack two metres away. When I then queued up behind the buggy, the kid looked at me and smilled. I smilled back and said something like "whats up with you". When the mum realised she came back immedeately and stared at me as if I had just done something terrible. The social bias is incredible.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 09:13 AM
3

I was all the patriarchy boy…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:55 AM
1

Well, I had this number in my head from reading a couple of articles a while back. I might be wrong, not sure.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 10:18 PM
3

Physicist here (PhD student). I hear the same argument over and over again: "We need more women in sscienece", they say. I have no problem with women in science what so ever, but why do they have to force it 50 / 50? There are plenty of grants you only can apply for if you are a woman. Women have the much better chances in science nowadays than men. It is shocking that sexist mechanisms like these are simply accepted – even more, if you raise your voice and say it is not ok, you are demonised as…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 08:15 PM
6

I made the same experience. Even though I found my current girlfriend via dating sites, I would not recommend it. I simply had luck to chat to the right person in the right moment. But generally you will have much more chances if you just go out and talk to people.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 03:54 PM
5

The number must be even higher. I once googled a bit on this topic, and found reports that it is even 1 woman in 10 men on these sites.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 03:52 PM
2

Just wanted to add that it is actually quite hard to get enough information about HPV as the common Joe, in particular about if or not men can get it, and if so, how. Even GPs in the UK give different information on that. Its weird.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter