TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The-Devilz-Advocate Archive

View 3 posts and 1,676 comments by The-Devilz-Advocate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,676 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Over the past several years, I've noticed a clear trend toward clothing that deliberately emphasizes the butt. Listen, I'm a guy, and I know just as much about fashion as the next, but these fashion trends largely came from the Kardashians, etc. Before that, the fashion/body type sought after by women were a slim type. The type that had a flat stomach, and barely any big curves. The Britney Spears, The Christina Aguileras, The Sarah Michelle Gellars (Buffy the Vampire Slayer), hell, even women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 07:05 PM
11

Im starting to think you people are trying to actively miss the point. No. The advice is said to: "How can I get girls to like me?"-esque questions. Being friends with women is legit not a hard thing to do, and most men that "struggle" with dating have no problems seeking out women as friends. That's NEVER been the fucking problem. It's getting to date women that they struggle with. Being friends with them does NOTHING to provide a solution to that problem and actively hampers men because then t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 07:06 PM
21

But the whole "Be friends with women" bit is said to men as an advice to them asking how to find somebody to date. Like this dichotomy is exactly the problem. If we all conclude that unattractive guys will never if ever enter a relationship by making friends with the girl they like, then why should they enter a friendship with them WHEN THEY WANT TO DATE THE WOMEN IN QUESTION? So if the advice men give to other men is to stop doing so. Then why the fuck is the response back: "Oh, so you wanted t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 05:42 PM
2

These men don’t care about those women when they’re idolizing their fucking abusers and calling them “successful” or commenting “oh well at least he got to hit”. One my highschool bullies always had a girl on his roster. He was sucessful. I can describe him that way because that's what he was in terms of dating. Doesnt mean I like it, or idolize it. If u care about women being hurt, you don’t prop up the people who traumatize and brutalize and violate them. wtf is that. Who is doing this? If the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:12 AM
3

Well, most people conflate being a critical of a person to attacking/hating on a person. So at the very least online, a sizable portion of the population does actually believe that people who are critical of these women are misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:09 AM
1

I mean, with all due respect. What should people feel about punishing the ones that believe they are above the law? Like, yeah, i think most people would agree that if the current laws that are routinely being broken, continue being broken, then the punishment should be harsher as a deterrent. Lowering the severity or straight up removing the law that makes it a crime would not solve the issue of people doing bad things. Like, most women that I know, would 100% advocate for medical castration or…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:02 AM
1

Dude looks like Kevin Spacey.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:57 AM
–

To be a stag he would need to be actively participating, not just be a voyeur no? If you havent had sex with him since december, but you have had sex with other people, while he still is mongomaous and takes care everything else inside said relationship, that's less of a stag and more like a cuckold dynamic. I'm just operating on the things you mentioned. So dunno if there's something I misinterpreted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:51 AM
1

Yeah but the comment in question was speaking about women in the mid 20s... So if a woman did not want me when we were 18-24ish, then i wouldnt want her either after she "changes" priorities. Hell, I wouldnt particularly entertain a woman who would have ignored me during those ages either, i'm not saying this out because it's some sort kf revenge fantasy, but because we probably wouldnt have anything to connect with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:42 AM
0

Different priorities as you grow is fine. Just dont expect for the people who you ignored in the past as they "built" themselves to become a good partner to suddenly want you with open arms.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:39 AM
–

I have nothing against you, your husband or your relationship, it's just kinda funny to me how you kinda walked yourself into the stereotype of most "poly" relationships. That being, the woman has higher libido, man has no libido or no desire to actually sleep with other people, but he's a good provider. Essentially, it's less of an "equal" poly relationship and more of a cuckold relationship. Like I said, meant no disrespect. I was reading your comment with seriousness and open mindedness but f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:35 AM
–

He's poly, yes, however, he is not currently engaging in anything with anyone. And we haven't been alone together since December. With all due respect. The joke writes itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:27 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:15 AM
–

Not when you compare them to same jobs, experience and work hours. And young women are now also outearning men too. But i guess that's fine now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 11:00 AM
–

Technically speaking, neither are white women, but we still have many protections for them in place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:24 AM
5

The idea that women have "no rules for the men they like" confuses attraction with social norms. Attraction has always been uneven. People overlook flaws in people they're attracted to. That's true for men and women alike. It isn't evidence that women don't have standards or that they're inventing rules to punish men. They might not be conciously doing so, but that's the effect of such. If a person observes that two people get different responses out of the same action, then the variable that ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 03:55 PM
0

2023 Allen, TX killed 8 (not just incel, white supremacist too) His motives are still unknown, and seem more possibly due to neo nazism than inceldom. Isla Vista shooting, 100% incel related. It's Elliot Rodgers. Roseburg too. Aztec shooting is highly disputed, the police state that the motive for the shooting was personal and to gain noitoriety. The southern poverty law center argues that it was because of racism and inceldom, but this is suspect because the same organization's bottom line is d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:57 PM
2

You read the first sentence and then ran with it, didn't you? Read the entirety of my comment and respond to it. Otherwise you just look like somebody pulled your pants down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:21 PM
2

Did you bother to check his bio before actually typing that? He was already starring in roles in 1995 and was already known as a C-list actor like Steve Buscemi. He made a movie with him, then due to nobody wanting to be his agent, Buscemi personally recommended him to other directors, and by 2003 he was getting STARRING ROLES in independent movies. The station agent, arguably his breakout movie, won him an award and 2 nominations and got him other independent movie roles with famous actors. His…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:13 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/1uqpwm3/i_accidentally_saw_a_video_of_my_new_girlfriend/ Brutal reality check
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:51 PM
–

Under every video I see about a girl being abused by a grown man. It's always men defending the predator. Reminder that Harvey Weinstein's trial in Manhattan was declared a mistrial because the jurors could not agree to a decision. The jurors were composed of 8 men and 4 women, the last vote was 9 in favor of a guilty verdict and 3 against. All of the jurors that voted against his guilt, were women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 10:30 PM
1

Fifty Shades of Grey, She's All That, 10 Things I Hate About You, HAIRSPRAY, Trainwreck (Amy Schumer and John Cena), The Dark Knight, The Way We Were, a majority of Melissa McCarthy's movies, The Shape Of Water, a majority of TV Shows and Movies where Lena Dunham is in, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:36 PM
4

we shouldn’t say a lack of self awareness or low iq gets you laid when that specifically makes most women more likely to reject you all because you can spam it and eventually succeed. Except it does... That's the point. If women are naturally adverse to men approaching anyways, why would a guy who is remotely interested in a woman, wait and build a friendship that could take months on the off chance that it could blossom into a loving relationship, assuming this woman doesn't have a major red fl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:12 PM
5

Being ugly, good with a backbone only means you will be single, but at least never played or used by women more than once per if you choose to be optimistic to their very rare approaches. You will still be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:36 PM
–

if you responded “yeah maybe you’re right” when they say they’re ugly and no one likes them Probably because it's usually worded as an insult and condescending attitude than simply agreeing with them. People that do it here do so to ragebait them with backhanded comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:23 PM
0

Only recently btw. And that's because unironicslly, colleges and universities have studied that new college applicants prefer a balanced or male dominated gender ratio for students than a female dominated gender ratio. Even freshmen women seem to avoid colleges that have a perception of being dominated by women or have a ratio where women are the majority. So now, very recently, like in the past 4 years or so, colleges are starting to accept more men to combat so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 01:27 PM
18

A significant number of progressive people will talk about how patriarchy harms men and women, but we’ve done a terrible job of communicating that to men who aren’t already immersed in progressive circles. The problem of not just the lack of communication of how it affects both men and women, but feminism has constantly pushed the idea that men, specially boys growing up TODAY somehow perpetrate it and are JUST AS A GUILTY as men of the past, and have to actively pay for the sins, of not just th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:09 AM
0

The midlife crisis angle I used was to simply highlight that if an attractive person perceives themselves as not getting the attention they should, or at least what they deem as normal to them, and then see other people of similar or less attractiveness getting more attention than them from social media, they would be inclined to post on social media to recieve that attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 05:13 PM
0

Hot people have gone their entire lives receiving attention. Even as teenagers. So I’m not convinced that external validation means as much or exists as often described in these context. Pretty sure (Ha get it?) that it's the opposite. There's a reason why attractive people seem to have a sudden mid-life crisis when their looks start to dwindle, specially from women, and then get obsessed into keeping their youth for as long as possible, even to the detriment of their overall health. Because sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 04:43 PM
5

Why is this always framed so negatively? Is resilience not beneficial? Perseverance? What about learning to handle rejection with grace and maturity? Through sheer volume? Because usually, the men and boys that ask such advice, typically are unattractive and/or socially awkward, so in their eyes, they have already experienced tons of rejections and shunning from both men and women, so now, to have them INTENTIONALLY do that while trying to keep a hopeful and cheerful attitude, as they willingly …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 04:19 PM
–

Wonder if that's lift and lurk or solo and the wookie. Both of them are the biggest male LARPers here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:55 PM
5

Jenny led him on when she needed something from him, wether it was a friend, stability, love, or intimacy, she knew Forrest liked her more than just a friend, even if he didn't really understood it himself. Jenny should have made a clean break from him period, but instead kept him at an arm's length in the case she needed him. How is it so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:42 PM
14

I hope people don’t jump down my throat here, but from what you describe it is kind of how I feel when someone calls me the n word. The difference would be that the person that is calling you the n word, is attributing you to a group of people, ergo, they are insulting you by using a word that was used to describe in a derogatory way towards a group. Emasculation is mostly on the personal. You don't actively attack all men, or a group of men, you attack a single man, and then say he doesn't even…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:16 PM
3

I never said the majority of the checklist, I said what the majority of the focus lies, on the ones that are superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:13 PM
6

emasculated is more hurtful than other forms of being hurt. I have had experiences where I’ve felt embarrassed, humiliated, or less than. Because esmasculation is all of that and more? The point is that it directly targets a man's identity not only for himself, but in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 07:40 PM
4

When a majority of the checklists they focus on, are superficial and the physical, instead of the character of the man they want, they will inevitably keep failing. You can have 100 different ideal things you want, but if you only focus on the most vain of them, then all you will get is vanity back.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:48 PM
13

Of course this raises the bar infinitely. I dont understand why that is suprising. It's surprising because they end up falling for the same man that exhibits the opposite of those values she cares so much about, only to end up in the same exact place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:07 PM
1

Regardless of who responded, the comment I posted first clearly outlined that she should not feel attacked or included in that statement. So no, even if she thought I was the same guy, that still doesn't merit that kind of response.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:09 PM
-5

The same applies to women tho: They want a guy with a successful job. A lot of money. Assets such as house/car paid off. Swimmer's build/Gym grinder. Taller than the average man. Cooks/cleans/does all the chores because that's not a woman's job anymore Is attentive/compassionate. Is emotionally open. Is sexually competent with no history. At the same time can't judge her sexual/dating history. Can handle her antics/psychological games Has a good family/gets along with hers Lets her walk all over…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:56 PM
2

Are you slow? I answered a hypothetical that you proposed. You asked why would a woman marry somebody that is a safety net. You ALREADY described the man that way, and the potential woman that marries the man, you just lacked the motivation of why would somebody do that. Which I answered. Learn to critically read and formulate your thoughts better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:50 PM
1

? I'm not making any opinion on the matter. The hypothetical of the scenario was, why would a woman marry a man that is seen as a safety net. I simply answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:44 PM
1

You asked why would somebody marry a safety net. I simply answered why would somebody do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:42 PM
2

Humans can't separate the logical from the emotional and viceversa. There's a reason why every study that compares what genders find attractive vs what they say is attractive proves that people are not conscious of the difference. Men say they would date an attractive chick that works at McDonald's while they work a 100k job, but results do show that they would prefer somebody closer to their financial bracket. Women state that they find a lot more men's physical features attractive than what th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:36 PM
1

Because they are drowning and are desperate for stability?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:31 PM
1

I'd hope for some sources to the claim, I'd like to inform myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:00 PM
0

I'd say gay men suffer more than women in terms of accepting sexuality because they are pressured higher by society to be "macho" and "masculine", and still have to uphold that standard. Even nowadays that being gay is generally accepted. Simply being a bottom is considered sissy/unmasculine behavior. So different? Maybe, but certainly not harder than gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:58 PM
–

Hilarous if true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:55 PM
0

That would still imply they have the highest divorce rates because gay men also were probably married to women at some point when they were in the closet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:53 PM
4

Isn't this literally a topic that was banned 2 days ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:52 PM
–

Don't know why you are being so hostile as if what I said was a personal insult, but I guess my comment offended you so greatly that you didn't bother to read the second sentence of my comment: But yeah if you do admit it to yourself and others then there is no beef to be had with you in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:49 PM
–

It's easier to say that online than it is to say that in public or in social settings tho. But yeah if you do admit it to yourself and others then there is no beef to be had with you in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 12:46 PM
–

I mean both can be a thing? You can miss/long having sex outright, and you can also miss/long for a stable relationship. Why does it have to be either/or?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 06:59 PM
2

At least you have your self-respect when you want off in a basement than essentially being so close yet so far to actually being loved and appreciated as a basic human.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 11:04 AM
2

In what world is being a cuck anything close to having an emotional and physical connection with a partner? The entire point is that you are so unattractive/sexually reprehensible that your partner will actively humiliate you by having sex with other people in front of you or st least blatantly without a care in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 10:04 AM
4

Judicial disparity and biases exist yes—and the majority of judges are still male. Men have a less in-group bias than women btw. If anything, most judges being men means that sentences are generally more equal compared to a majority female judge since women generally have and look at their own group through a favorable lense. Also—While men overall face harsher sentencing than women, Black and Hispanic men face a staggering compound disparity. In the U.S., a Black man is statistically far more l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:16 PM
9

Because it means that good-natured men only become relevant when women look for long term partners. Basically, good guys finish last, after the women play the field. Keep in mind, I don't necessarily believe that, but this came straight from the horse's mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 03:05 AM
–

Brutal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:01 PM
6

Why does this feel like a complaint that women will have more freedom to choose a partner based on desire and the happiness their partner brings to their lives rather than being pressured to settle for someone Not really a complaint tho. Just stating that it would just exharbitate the issues already present in apps like Tinder etc. Just on a societal scale. No, it means something even worse.. it means the balance of power would shift to women. It would shift to the attractive men, because those …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:52 PM
–

That type of objectification does happen with men, but it's usually... I know. That still doesn't disprove what I said, nor that society doesn't reduce men to that objectification. It's not like women are all just going. "He's a free meal ticket." A man's value in a society, is how useful he is to that society. That includes the women that live in that society. So they partake in that form of objectification towards men. Sigh... Someone who is sensitive to a man's goals and other attributes besi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:18 PM
–

Sure... let me double disprove the study made by an AI company posted by a person that can't bother to actually read even the headlines of it, and thought that posting 3 different links of the same wrongful study that has no mention of the actual way it gathered data nor how they determined it's value sets nor the methods they used, then responded with immediate offense and insults, surely that person will change their minds right? Stop asking chat-gpt for links and actually read the studies tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:09 PM
–

But you did not mention qualities outside of that hypothetical woman's usefulness (that she's smart and driven with accomplishments under her belt), that by definition is objectivication. What? Do you think sexual objectiviation is the only type of objectivication?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:04 PM
–

Ironically, the fact that you only mentioned the utility/goals of a potential hypothetical woman, that being that she's smart, ambitious, and has accomplishments, would be categorized as an objectivication as well. That type of objectivication mostly happens to men, tho, so I guess that must be why it flew over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:56 PM
12

The reward for going to work and contributing to society is your paycheck and negotiated benefits such as paid days off, health insurance and a pension/401k Those are not rewards. That's what you get as exchange for your services, aka work. Why do women literally become hard core conservatives when it comes to dating issues. If you go to work and they give you a paycheck at the end of your day for the work you did, that's an exchange of services.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:31 PM
-4

She won't answer because there is no way it actually will unless you account the reality that only the attractive men will see an increase or rather drive up the sex statistic. This means that the balance of power will shift from wealthy elites (primarily men btw) to attractive men. Which if she had any semblance of intelligence and had read any kind of study about such, would realize that often than not, successful wealthy men tend to be more physically attractive, charismatic, taller than aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:20 PM
2

First link: The usual subjects are the biggest culprits. "Emotional" takes the cake with 78% of women having been described by that term versus just 11% of men. "Unlikeable" was used to describe 56% of women versus 16% of men. "Difficult" is the most evenly spread of the negative stereotypes, with 32% of women, 21% of men, and 40% of non-binary and/or gender fluid people having been described as difficult at one point. More troubling than the unbalanced use of negative stereotypes is that the gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 12:03 PM
0

I mean I did too? like what the fuck is that supposed to mean. Jesus. You aren't a pussy, well, neither am i, and technically speaking, neither is her, but the women she competes with are "pussies" because they are biologically, women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:59 PM
0

Couldn't explain why its a problem. Woman presenting person is biologically a man, competing against biological women. Some people find this wrong and unfair, including the women that compete against her. You: "Somehow I don't see the problem."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:56 PM
1

There is fundamentally nothing she did to covertly present herself as a woman, she grew up as a woman, competed as a woman, identified as a woman her entire life. Presenting socially as a certain gender does not INVALIDATE or CHANGE biology. How is this fuzzy logic? She's controversial because of that. If you had said she was trans you might even have the case but now its like anyone who is genetically gifted is bad. Like you are incapable of understanding her condition, let alone the problem. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:48 PM
1

This is what I'm contesting, we haven't really found a way to define this. Because if overproduction of testosterone due to the rare genetic disorder causes you get banned, are we gonna cap testosterone ranges for women's sports? My guy, you DO understand, that her condition meant that she was going to be a boy, but her body couldn't produce the hormone that is necessary to further develop their male genitalia? She was raised as a girl because she did not present male external genitalia. That do…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:39 PM
1

Why does overproduction of testosterone mean she's not a woman or not allowed to compete? I never claimed both of these things btw. I simply challenged your claim that she has never been tested for things like male puberty or hormone imbalance, while at the same time pointing out how her having to take medication to lower her own testosterone is somehow also not an indication of her potentially having a condition related to her biology. Yes, she does have "internal balls" or male internal genita…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:11 PM
1

Very easy to prove that she has male puberty through testing. In fact she's stated that she's specifically medically lowered her testosterone. Is that not enough? Or is there more doubt? That would imply that she DOES have "problems" that cause her to generate way more testosterone that needed. Checked online and apparently she has this condition: 5-alpha reductase deficiency Which makes her unable to convert testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, a hormone needed to continue DEVELOPING their male…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:30 PM
4

"So many" is not "all". Different people like different things. Majority then. Most women find facial symmetry and a swimmer's build attractive, which is why it's so permeative and common in hollywood/K-pop etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:54 PM
–

I’m calling out the double standard that only women’s actions and feelings are being critiqued. Again, don’t expect you guys to be Batman. The men who complain usually don’t speak out against the weirdos and that’s what I’ve realized. I've mentioned why in other comments: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1hjbvt8/comment/m36l5iu/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button When women confront men in public, even if they use physical for…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:40 PM
–

Don't most major retailers just let people steal, tracking how much they steal every time they visit the store, to then call the cops once it becomes a major crime instead of a petty one?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:28 PM
6

Searched up her personal life just to see. She revealed that during her 20s she terminated, not one, not two, but three pregnancies. So, assuming Leslie Jones is the lowest of the low in terms of attractive women, at least a single guy out there managed to have sex with her 3 different times unprotected.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 04:28 PM
25

Don’t ask strangers for dating advice. We don’t know you. At best you’re getting broad generalizations and recycled talking points. That has nothing to do with the problem at hand. Because a lot of (mostly) women here haven't dated in half a decade, maybe more, then smugly act condescending towards grievances made by people who are currently trying to date. They come here to shit stir the pot while calling themselves superior while using therapy speak or "sweetie" speak Exhibit A of the kind of …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:24 PM
2

Well, the thing is if a man is the biggest asshole around... why would we notice that? If he is hiding the fact he is an asshole to us, but is open with it to others how are we supposed to be held accountable for that? gestures broadly Because men that are assholes are not master manipulators, they'll treat you pleasant while at the same time acting as if he is above everybody else around him. A majority of assholes are not master manipulators, they are just as obvious as the so called "nice guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:17 PM
1

In terms of casual sex, we don't need to align on every moral aspect of the man we are fucking. But he has to be the baseline of nice and respectful In terms of initial attraction, the entire point of getting your ass in the seat in front of him, it doesn't matter. Like you said, he could be the biggest asshole in his vicinity but as long as he doesn't treat you that way for 1-2 hours, you can sleep with him no problem. And most of these red pill men aren't really that baseline of respectful or …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:06 PM
3

I think being "good" is a factor. Its just women see that as the baseline. Again, if that were true, the opposite wouldn't be fairly regular. Women of all ages do not particularly care about the morality of a man until after they want a long term relationship with him. If being good was a baseline for women, then average but good men would be constantly sought after (compared to average but horrible men), when in reality it's not (cosntant studies show this), the most important baseline for attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:41 PM
3

Sure. Another issue of red pill is that they act like women do this a lot more than them This might be because of difference worldview perspectives. Most men right now grew up with the idea that women's romantic and sexual inclinations were closely related to morality and virtues. So as long as men were virtuous and good, they would be the ones more sought after by women. The reality is that it's not a factor. You believe that red pillers say that "women do it more than men", when in reality the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:24 PM
4

My issue with redpill is that they think men are chosen because they are assholes. But men are chosen for their attractiveness If you only engaged with the current redpill grift that would be accurate. But the old RP, born from TRP-esque communities used to say exactly that. Hell, even the ones nowadays still say that, but it's mostly just "Attractive men don't have worry about being pleasant/non-assholes because attractiveness supersedes personality for most women." Again, very rarely do I even…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:08 PM
1

Both RP and blackpill believe in the same "truths". The difference is what they believe people or men should go about it. RP says yeah, world is shit, women are hypergamistic and superficial, yes the world generally treats men worse, but hey, if you work on yourself both physically and socially, you would be one of the few top men enjoying the "decline" (decline of the world turning into shit). Blackpill looks at the same truths and says, nah, men are doomed if they weren't born with the right g…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:17 PM
–

Then you're probably not compatible and should just move on. It's nothing to be angry at her about. Is it not the main argument from RP that if a woman does not want to do her best with the man they are currently dating, then that man should break up with her and find one that does?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:07 PM
5

Incels are not necessarily hateful my guy. How ignorant do you have to be to not understand the difference between a popular stereotype and a reality. Do you also believe that every feminist is a man-hating pink haired college lesbian? Obviously not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:34 PM
–

Platonic In love Now I understand why people use Chat-GPT. Fucking dumbasses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:52 PM
6

suddenly that same sexual attention becomes chemistry, tension, flirting", that's because the woman has decided to engage with the man His argument is that she chooses to engage with it AFTER she's unwillingly sexually objectified. It's a very different situation if a man walks up to her, starts talking sexually, she ignores him or asks him to go away But that's not the scenario he's talking about. He's talking about the idea that women don't want to be sexually objectified, period. He is arguin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:14 PM
3

I was gonna be snark and respond back that it's hilarous that a synopsis of a book released almost 200 years ago would need spoiler tags... but I'll add it instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 05:37 PM
0

I'm considering it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 05:27 PM
12

It's a reference to a book called Mobey Dick... you know... the novel famously known for portraying a ship captain's obsession of killing a massive whale called Mobey Dick to the point that he throws his entire life into the hunt of the creature that ends with him finally stabbing the large whale with a harpoon line, which gets accidentally tied around the Captain's neck as well as the entire ship, dragging all of them to the bottom of the ocean.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:47 PM
7

Because it paints a very bleak world, if it's true that almost every woman on earth finds 80% of men unattractive and simply not worth considering. Men have more varying degrees of preferences, which would average out the bell curve of attractiveness of women. Meaning that the majority would be paired off with a man who finds them attractive. According to you and the person you responded to, it's literally a fantasy that the average man will ever find a woman that physically finds them attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:42 PM
14

But that begs a question: Why do women behemently deny that assertion? That they find the majority of men unattractive at best, and at worst, they don't even register in their worldview? It seems like a very big thing to simply deny or hand wave.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:36 PM
–

And the answer to that is work on your qualifications to improve your resume... You proved their point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:20 PM
0

1.) many men call themselves RP, but then make statements that directly contradict RP (ie some say “men don’t have the luxury of being selective!”, which directly contradicts RP’s own “I Am the Prize” as well as “Nexting” and “Abundance Mentality”.) How is it that you can cherry pick statements to prove a point? Average men don't have the luxury of being selective, because women flock to the men with status. Therefore, a man must improve his looks, financial and social standing in order to becom…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 03:56 PM
19

what women should be doing for men When women complain about dating, it's because the men they date are not doing things they want them to do. So, same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 12:08 PM
2

Maybe so, but that's not what you responded with. You directly referenced the only evidence that he already dismissed in the title of his argument. You do understand that right? It's like somebody asking you: "Can you name 5 TV-series other than Bridgerton?" And you replying with Bridgerton.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:21 PM
0

It's not that you don't understand the point he's trying to make. It's that you are trying to call him wrong by stating the only example in which he already acknowledged and dismissed. Even if you believe he is wrong there should be more evidence of the contrary that you could name, yet you didn't bother to name a single one. Either that or you can't read correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:13 PM
1

I mean let's be honest. When women feel offended at a man, they default back into the same insults without checking the Validity of them: Incel, virgin, misogynist
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:09 PM
1

Read the title of this post, and you'll get why your response only proved his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:06 PM
3

Outliers aren't just Stacy and Chad. ????? I never said they were. I said that men's standards have to be lower because of the nature of LACK of attention from everyday women. Women get to be the ones who set standards because they are the ones that generally are being sought after, not the men. Which at first can sound hopeless, but if we think about it, we frequently look for answers on the internet where less than one in one billion web pages have the answer I'm not sure what you are trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:53 PM
5

Well, as an outlier who seems to have skipped getting those specific genes, outliers are all that is relevant to me. I mean, mathematically speaking, women can afford to only target outliers as long as they are between average and hot. Average men can't really afford to only further segregate and choose outliers, since a woman putting any kind of effort onto them is already outlier enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:06 PM
2

Absolutely nothing about that sentence indicated narcissism lol This is what he said tho: If you walk into a room and act like a complete douchebag and start hogging attention, you will get rewarded for it while the respectful guy will get overlooked. It's the kind of man that constantly tries to one-up other men in group settings. It's very different from a man who's just chill and likable so everybody looks up to him. It's the male equivalent of a woman that constantly makes a big show and ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 04:03 PM
2

I think this is the first time I upvoted a comment of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:41 PM
–

He's a trumpeter. That is not an "attractive" instrument to play, unless you like, are a total jazz head. So, she's a jazz head then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:34 PM
–

He is tall yes, but that's all he has going for him. And he has no status, he's a studio musician. Lindy makes the money. Aren't male musicians often one of the most attractive "hobbies" for men? Lindy makes the money And she's a morbidly obese woman with lack of social skills and so high up on the "woke" (not my choice of wording, but the far lefty kind), that she is actively allowing herself to get cheated on and taken for granted. She was not! That's the whole point. She only came around to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:05 PM
–

Countless studies done on the matter that people respond more favorably to taller people. But it's apparently not real.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:02 PM
–

I mean, the guy does look fairly average, maybe slightly uglier, but she's still looking far worse, on the account of her being obese. She looks like Kate from "This is Us."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:00 PM
–

You'll be like "Hello! I like to bake and have a husband!" And their immediate response is "would you, perhaps, rate my peen? No? I will be sending it regardless:)" Where are you talking or frequenting at where men do that in droves? Don't women constantly harp on men not going to places where they could have mutual hobbies with women? I'd assume that if you were trying to make friends and liked baking, you would go to a bakery class or a baking competition or something of that nature and meet f…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:58 PM
1

women do the same for men too. The point is that in the public space, and in society's lenses, when a woman crosses boundaries, she's not treated as harshly as when men do. It's like your purposely chose to ignore the first few sentences of the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:51 PM
5

If the group rewards the guy who is exciting and dominating social situations, then he's not exhibiting antisocial behavior is he? Because it's a sign of narcissism which does overlap with anti-social behavior. What he's trying to say is that those men that hog all the attention, often care little about the collective, they often think about their own gain only. They don't care if they are making other people uncomfortable, specially men, because they are the competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:48 PM
3

ICE detention centers have a bunch of pregnant kids that were forced into pregnancy. The states that banned abortion are forcing people to keep pregnancies that were not always a product of voluntary acts. Weren't studies done on the reasons people abort, and like less than 4% of abortions happen because the pregnancy was created in a forced or involuntary act? Like, it's extremely disingenuous to use rapes/incest/etc as justification for your argument when they are far far the smallest percenta…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:41 PM
1

Tbf there's a difference between brining someone on a date and buying them a meal because you want to make them happy, and throwing money at an uninterested party or a party that is clearly not as into you as you are into them. That would be simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:21 AM
7

Something something, woman lived as a man for a year to prove how easy being a guy was, was considered effeminate by men and the women she dated, was alone, had nobody to really talk to, she described how women would instantly go on the defensive instead of being warm and receptive when she was a woman. Something Something wrote a book about how terrible it was then ended her own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:35 AM
-3

Reality but without all the omission of truths women and bp tend to employ to get some of these men to stay in the bucket with the rest of the crabs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:07 PM
1

Why try so hard to date someone when you know they are not compatible with you? You might want to examine your beliefs if you literally have to hide them from your prospective partner because you know they are disqualifying. Because not everything has to be shared and not everything has to be agreed upon. That's all. I keep my TRP beliefs for myself and online.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:13 PM
6

Its just a lot of red pill men do shoot themselves in the foot because they often can't help but express their opinions to women they try to date that gives those women the clear signals that he is red pilled. Thus someone she wants to avoid dating. Literally the first 2 rules about TRP is to not talk about it outside of said space. If a man does, he's actually stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 08:00 PM
11

Ah yes the women who would have clowned on me mercilessly if I commented that I only wanted Kate Upton as an overweight college man Def wanted me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:56 PM
6

It becomes oppression when men say "you don't deserve to want what you want. you should tolerate less". I thought it was clear, but sure, pretend it doesn't happen. I wanted Kate Upton when I was 20 years old. Did I deserve her when I was in college and unemployed and still overweight? Of course not. You know exactly what people mean when they say such responses. If you want to act offended because of it, that's on you. But it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:45 PM
–

Nah women are a Monolith because there's always a ys going to be one claiming they are not. Clearly only monoliths respond in that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:40 PM
–

Or because there's a common narrative going around that women are "happy" being alone... which is directly contradicted by the studies done on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:38 PM
1

Abuse teaches the brain that “abuse = familiar affection” and “healthy love = unfamiliar affection”. The brain always will seek what’s familiar. There’s a reason Freud discovered mommy and daddy issues. And yet its said time and time again by you guys that abusers always hide their abusiveness. So which one is it? Do they act cautious with everybody that appear to be good, even abusers, or do they just act cautious to people that are good, because of reasons never explained?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 09:07 PM
1

it’s your assumption they wouldn’t be doing this? Someone can do all these things and still end up in an abusive relationship. And if they REPEATEDLY end up in those kinds of relationships, it speaks to their inability to learn. Hence the disagreement. They can’t recognise green flags the way people who grew up in healthy environments did. Acting cautious against people that seem to be presenting to themselves as good is never an issue. You can't simultaneously hold the idea that these women kee…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:56 PM
1

Is it the failure of a blind person that they cannot see? It's the failure of a blind person after being told they are blind, realizing they are blind and STILL not trying to find resources to DEAL with their CONDITION. Same thing with being deaf. They are not invalids. They are not children. They can navigate the world in their own way with help as long as it's both provided and seeked out by them. If the areas in your brain needed to form healthy relationships were fucked up in early childhood…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:26 PM
3

Victim blaming It's called accountability. A therapist or psychiatrist that deals with a patient that has what you said, works with them to explore the why, and how to change it. But that's the crux. If you fall for it numerous times, and complain about it, it's on you. What’s failure? If a man gets abused by a woman OPs argument is still valid. Abuse victims are abuse victims (ungendered). Apparently I have more empathy for male abuse victims than you since you’re blaming them or call it “failu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:09 PM
1

radicalization of the Red Pill community and how their ideology has landed them on US domestic terrorism watchlists When did this happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:06 PM
1

So therefore it's up to thesw women to recognize that their prefrontal cortex is fucked and to actively change their ways, right? You aren't just bringing up "past abuse" to remove their accountability and responsibility to grow from it, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:19 PM
2

The term "In group bias " has nothing to do with a group all having the same preferences. It's when a group tends to put more TRUST, Favor and general leniency to their own members OVER the outsiders. Men are more critical to one another, and tend to be more individualistic, women tend to be the opposite. Therefore, women have a higher in-group bias because they tend to protect/favor their own group and are less critical of one another COMPARED to criticizing somebody from outside their group. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:34 PM
–

Women ☕️...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:27 PM
2

Did you read the edit? That part I quoted is from the study itself. That's why I know for a fact that you did not read even the abstract of the study you are referencing. You aren't lazy. You are just purposely ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 04:35 PM
1

Obv not every single soda is bad. You just don't get to accurately predict whether a given soda is good or bad. Nobody is saying, hey there won't ever BE bad apples or sodas. What redpillers are stating, is that if all you end up with ARE bad apples or sodas. That's not a problem with all sodas and apples, that's a problem with you not doing the bare minimum to TRY to separate the bad apples and sodas from the good ones. There are tells that you can make to discern MOST of the bad products by lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:20 PM
4

Do you have any evidence of this? And don’t men hate when women settle? The study in question literally spells it out for you. What other evidence, do you need? Women have higher physical/beauty standards for men they end up with, than what they state they want for their ideal partners. So literally it spells out "Alpha fucks" like huh? Okay? Should women date men they don’t want to? Why can’t a woman just stay single if she wants to? Is every woman obligated to date someone? Where did this idea…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:08 PM
3

By looking at the contents and nutritional value inside or if the soda you can get is all bad, substitute it with carbonated flavored water, that's basically what I drink all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:03 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:32 PM
3

You just don't get to reliably avoid the bad ones, bc the labels are not trustworthy. You could be holding a good one in one hand, and a bad one in the other, and not be able to tell the difference at all. Even cracking them open isn't necessarily gonna tell you. Yeah, but if you REPEATEDLY take the bad soda, then that leads to the problem of accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:32 PM
1

To understand the source of pay differences, we looked at the overall pay gap, and also at the differences in earnings for men and women when they work in the same occupation, in the same company, and in the same position in the same company At least I'm the article referencing the study. Nowhere does it state that they actually accounted for an equal time spent on the same company. Just that they worked at the same company and had the same position and/or job title. Did you read your own articl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:23 PM
2

But on the other hand you have to do something with those data points and every choice is going to impact your results. I mean, the reality is that you have to put an "uncategorized" point, and either specifically cite the actual reasons they dropped out or find the most common ones and include them in the survey. You can not just meaningfully ignore those data points just because it looks better for your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:18 PM
4

Yeah, the problem is not the researcher or author that made the biased study. It's that the people who should act as the great filters in journals AKA peer-reviewers tend to also be just as biased, instead of objective, which defeats the entire point of peer-review.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:15 PM
4

People generally don’t know what they want. Stated vs revealed preferences are consistently very different in studies, for BOTH men and women. For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. "A Worldwide Test of the Predictive Validity…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:11 PM
1

Then explain incels. "If women all collectively ignore that man, either that man stays alone, or is forced to change perspectives."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 04:23 PM
7

I suppose unfortunately the corrolary is that many of the women he dates also hold the same perspective, or at least are used to it and roll with it to a fair extent. You'd need enough women that he wants to date that are bothered enough to make a stink about it and actually impact his dating prospects to see significant results. But if that were true, there wouldn't be such a stink from so many women about the "asshole" men to begin with. Either women tolerate behavior they shouldn't because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:00 PM
8

This isn't really true, though -- really the only person who has the power to change his mindset is himself, right? Nobody else can absolutely ensure that he will. Obviously. Nothing will ensure he change perspectives, but an incentive that is granted to him to change perspectives, is if women collectively choose to ignore him. Hence my point. I think what you're describing here is the idea that women, having something he cares about more than whatever men have, possibly have more leverage than …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 10:50 PM
9

If a man only cares about tits, it won’t matter if she’s covered up, “respectable,” young, old, shy, loud, religious, married, liberal, conservative. He’ll only think in cup sizes. He’s already made up his mind women are only good for a nice pair of tits to look at. And if that's his prerogative then he should own up to the consequences. I fail to understand the issue. If a man only thinks that women are good for their tits, it is not up to me or the other men in his life to change his behavior.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 10:16 PM
2

When men complain about women’s unreasonable standard, they aren’t counting the ugly women who might sleep with them. An ugly woman receives more attention from potential dating partners than the opposite. You are 100% wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:59 PM
1

As i said. All the men i had to lower my standards for in terms of attraction because "he could be nice" like all the incels and red pillers say... they always ended up as the worst So... continue on as you do... why do you keep repeating yourself. I'm not disagreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:45 PM
–

Men here claim we go for the abusive chads and thays why we are abused and we should choose better (which, yes. We should choose better) Women tend to choose men on their attractiveness while also ignoring red flags. Men state that the problem is not women that choose chads but rather that women do not USE the same standards between men that are chads, and those that are not. If a woman is struggling, it is because she almost always chooses to ignore red flags in favor of attractiveness. But fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:28 PM
–

The hot men are never the ones I have been abused by lol. Its always the red pilled men and the men im pressured to give a chance to who have been the problem Where did I state that the men that redpill "claim" you should go out with, are chads? The most manipulative men I have met are the traditionally non chads. Which is why I assume you already ignore them to begin with... exactly what I said in my last comment... You need to put more effort into your reading skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:21 PM
–

Im perfectly content with the men who have chosen me. And of whom I have chosen I said YOU as in the woman that is not vetting attractive men and ending up chosen by abusive ones. I have had my worst experiences with the men red pill men claim I need to give a chance to because we women need to give non chads a chance If that was your experience, then nothing is stopping you from simply ignoring those kind of men. Which I assume you already did do for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:17 PM
–

men. Red pill men tho. Lift and lurk gets an exception cuz he a BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:16 PM
1

Where women feel hurt is when men respond defensively instead of curiously. You know, there was a time where that was the case. You know when? Right before and during the Metoo era. And what did women constantly state? Asking questions or probing for answers from women is the same as supporting their violence or questioning "their" truth. You do nor get to simply dismiss that portion of how WOMEN respond to questions to that just because it suits your argument. Women get offended if you probe or…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:12 PM
–

Like, have you considered a lot of good looking guys are actually really good guys? Yeah, but they aren't "choosing" YOU. The entire point is that somehow the woman that is whining about attractive men, always seems to end up with a shitty one. When men make that statement. They don't state it to any and all women, they specifically state it women that keep repeatedly whining about "horrible" men that mistreat then in some way. So in that case it 100% applies. Choose better. I constantly use tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:56 PM
–

Yeah but the entire point of your commemt is kind of contradictory. So men ghost after sex. Okay, and? If anything, wouldn't it be far easier to assess if a man wants to be in a relationship with you if you sleep with him quicker rather than potentially spending months building a relationship with him only to sleep with him once and realize it's all fake? That's your own logic btw. I'm simply following your stream of thought. So in the end, the only thing "preventing" you from not "choosing bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:51 PM
2

Men compete with my peace. Men compete with my joy. Men compete with no responsibilities. Men compete with my life without cooking, cleaning and sex pestering. Men compete with my freedom and independence. Tell me you don't understand the meaning of the word "compete", without telling you don't understand the meaning of the word "compete". Men compete against other men, for YOU. Your peace, your joy, your "no responsibilities" etc etc. They compete for your attention. Unless you are ONLY putting…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 03:31 PM
1

I'm not stating that men are helpess. You paint a majority of men as lazy fucks that want to be praised for doing subpar or "the bare minimum" in this case the bare minimum is making a conversation which keeps the women's attention long enough while also making the first few dates both enjoyable and unique compared to other men, yet you yourself couldn't do the "bare minimum" of reciprocating and actually engaging in conversation with the men and simply moved on to another. Which is funny. Becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 03:06 PM
0

To be fair i have probably as much dead conversations and i just move on and never even though to say that it's me jumping through hoops Because it's easier for women to do that, since the man has to "do the bare minimum" of setting up everything in the initial stages. Congrats you proved my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:56 PM
0

Well to be fair i remember how they said that "jumping through hoops" was basically making a conversation, or choosing a place to meet, so i don't know anymore It's "jumping through hoops" when the woman does not reciprocate anything and replies in one word answers. It's a monkey dance because of the same point. This entire post and your worldview revolves on the singular idea that the only men that exist in the world are attractive men that the women who agree to go out with them find insanely …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:49 PM
4

I see it here, when i ask how men are going to compete if they understand that women are getting way more attention than them. And men act humiliated that they have to do anything. Your first sentence has nothing to do with the other. Men ALREADY COMPETE with other men with the women they are trying to woo. Men ALREADY are figuratively fighting for the attention of the woman. Men that complain HERE do so because this is the only sub where you are allowed to. Who or where else will you complain t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:01 PM
3

I don't mind numbers perse, but standards. I've known serial monogamisst that have 20+ exes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:19 PM
1

You know what. I was going to disagree with you, but I see your point. That's definitely coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:18 PM
1

https://i.imgur.com/KgdZ69s.png
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 03:09 PM
1

nah it wasn't me but I did chuckle at it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 07:51 AM
-11

That guy was shitposting tho. Clearly in jest. But you know what the say about women and humor...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 11:59 PM
7

Also, anger is stereotypically the only emotion that gets culturally coded as “masculine.” And complaining and moaning is often culturally coded as "feminine" hence why the term bitch is used towards women. Because just like a female dog in heat, they "bitch and moan". So either both aren't enough to be used in any scientific context or both are. But you can't pick and choose when it's convenient to your argument or position.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:21 AM
1

Tatakae-Kaw!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:07 AM
2

It's because of the amount of makeup and botox she has on at all times. When she was younger she didn't have that much make up on and looked way better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:04 AM
9

Women score more neurotic in Big Five” comes from women self reporting having more negative emotions such as being anxious, depressed, and self conscious. This doesn’t equal women complaining more. I’ve seen no such study that indicates that. That same study also states that men exhibit more emotions like anger than women, which is commonly repeated by women all the time but I guess since it's a self-report by men too, that means it's false right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 01:57 AM
–

And I'm stating why the way you wrote the sentence is the issue at hand. You put the cart BEFORE the horse. That's the problem. You made it seem as if young men are the ones refusing to date older women than them, when it's the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:05 PM
2

It's a meme because it's a joke. Memes are jokes. Jokes are memes. And some jokes are made as a reflection of society. The term "hood cricket" is made in jest to any video/stream/clip of a person filming themselves and not noticing how the smoke detector is begging for new batteries throughout the entire video. Why is it called hood? Because people from the hood often are the ones filming themselves ignoring it. It's a joke and a commentary at the same time. The 6/6/6 meme is exactly the same. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:03 PM
1

It's the difference between calling yourself an atheist because you grew up in an abusive religious environment and attribute all religious people as that environment and calling yourself an athiest because you evaluated, did your own research and determined that that's the most likely realistic scenario of the creation of our universe. One calls themselves an atheist because they are doing it as a form of counter-culture, and the other calls themselves an atheist because they evaluated reality …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 01:30 PM
–

I did. You implied that the young men are the ones not willing to date older women, stating that the barrier that older women have that impedes them dating young men, is the young men themselves, when women are the ones that specifically AVOID dating younger men than themselves in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 01:24 PM
1

No, because she is saying that the reason why older women don't date younger men is because young men avoid them. When that's not true either. She's putting the blame on younger men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:38 PM
1

Interesting, seems like this ideology is based on some pretty rough crowds It's an ideology that was born out of men that were "chads" explaining how they operated to unattractive and borderline autistic men. That's the RP in a nutshell. Explaining how dating dynamics work for autistic men because those men are the ones that need to understand it the most and don't have the resources outside of RP to learn so. Hence why personal accountability used to be a big thing in their subreddit before it …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:41 AM
1

Two things: One of the first "rules" you were taught about women in TRP was that they lie when it comes to their sexual partners. So it's best to always just operate on the idea that the woman you are dating has already had 10+ partners. Because that way, you don't emotionally latch yourself onto them if turns out they had more sexual partners than they had originally stated. Hence why the "don't date over 25+" is stated... because it generally means less baggage and sexual history...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:29 AM
2

Hmm, I've personally seen a lot of RP that do promote the idea of settling with and marrying a good, traditional woman, but maybe that's a newer branch off of the ideology. RP is about maximizing dating for men. You casually date women "under 25" because they have less baggage, then if you want, you marry a "traditional" woman and settle down with her. There is no disconnect, it's just that when it comes to DATING, RP discussions are about casual dating, not about serious relationship situations…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:24 AM
7

I often see alot of emphasis on a woman's age in the red pill (usually extremes like over 25 is a no go) aswell as emphasis on traditional lifestyles. Your response to this is to make up a hypothetical that ignores the context of why "over 25 is a no go"? The whole point of why RP used to promote the idea that over the age of 25 was a no go, is because the woman that was over the age of 25 and was dating, was looking to SETTLE after supposedly playing the field and having her fun. RP usually pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:14 AM
3

That's not the reason. Women date slightly older guys because those slightly older guys are more established and financially stable than them. A college freshman will date a senior, or a graduate that works has his own apartment etc. A 17 year old will date a 19 year old that has his own car etc. Older women don't date down. They date equal or up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:07 AM
3

For example: below average men think their experiences are the same as all men. Ask an average man how much he gets laid or how many Tinder dates he can set up. Most of them will either say 0 or 1 or 2 every 4 months or so. It's only women that geniunely believe that only below average men struggle to date. When the truth kf the matter is that average men all struggle with dating, uglier men just struggle more and are more toxic'vocal about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:04 AM
3

It's a matter of perspective. A person that lives in a much better socio-economic situation than somebody in India would laugh at the notion of somehow an Indian person bullying another since they are both in a "poor" country. A person living in India that has only ever experienced such a life, being mercilessly bullied by another, is obviously going to feel like shit. It's not a hard concept to grasp.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:01 AM
2

True, I've romanced BB but didn't kiss her until she was single so I didn't really get that aspect. What's funny about BB's kiss scene, is that the same streamer you mentioned, Stormfall33, also was PISSED and ANGRY because she opted NOT to kiss her but BB recoiled away, then reloaded a save and chose to kiss her and BB was still pulling back: https://youtu.be/fQRKQflDGq4?si=cwoHHrHXLr9Jmzga&t=5375 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6NwvTUe_UfU
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:20 PM
3

She is a literal criminal for starters and did something really fucked up in her past that I'm not going to get into because it's a massive spoiler. Literally flip the genders and you have a classic "I can fix him" love interest. Technically speaking, she continues to betray the MC till basically the last episode btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:16 PM
0

I can tell you what i thought. I thought that i don't want his roommate to see me like that, i was ashamed and scared, and i didn't want him to be angry, and i painted all scary scenarios in my head. He might've thought it was "coy" too. Doesn't change the fact that he ignored my "no" and it wasn't "coy". That guy was a piece of shit and should he castrated. But again, I was put in the same situation as him, and I kicked her out. She told me she wanted to stay, despite not wanting to do anything…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 06:08 PM
0

How it "looks" huh? How ironic. So I "look" like a rapist or rape excuser because I said that women that play coy but don't leave are not giving clear signals to men. While also stating that I don't condone rape and when I was pit in the same situation I simply opted to kicking the girl out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:57 PM
–

I'm not a rape excuser either moron. I simply stated that women do play coy instead of simply walking out. That doesn't mean I excuse rape or, godforbid, perpetrate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:46 PM
1

Yeah but that's the thing, when women talk to about consent, they talk about things that are VIOLATED after sexual contact have been made. Like you said, you both want to have sex and he puts it in the butt with no warning or ask. But when men talk about consent, they talk about the things PRIOR to actual sexual contact. Hence why they find it so difficult because women don't like being asked "Hey, wanna have sex?" Etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:43 PM
–

Congratulation - you're a rapist. First of all, no, I'm not. Jackass. If you bothered to read the next paragraph, I literally stated that when I had that happen to me, I simply kicked her out. Second, I'm sorry, but if I DON'T WANT to do something that somebody else wants me to do, I remove myself entirely from the situation. I don't linger around them, and I certainly don't stay cooped up or god forbid cuddling with them or anything of that nature, specially if it's something to do with my boun…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:40 PM
4

Men get confused because they assume women are always speaking consistently and literally. . There's nothing dubious, vague, or incompatible about these two scenarios Unless... men were taught that female sexual nature wasn't as tied to the physical attractiveness of men as they really were... which loops back to the RP talking points that many women here deny.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:25 PM
0

Most of the problems were when a woman went to his place on a date, and men claimed that she knew what that meant I mean, yeah it's usually an invite to have sex. Don't tell me you are just wanting to get coffee at a random person's apartment at 2am or something. That doesn't mean that it's an all "Ok" sign to have it tho. and even if she said no, he didn't care. Or they don't stop when there is a no, because she already agreed to sex. Or something else, there are hundreds of ways men ignored co…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:21 PM
3

It's like some years ago they talked about consent and how hard it is to navigate Consent has never been "hard" to grasp for men. The problem is that some women HATE when the men they are with, have to keep asking them for the Ok sign. These women want their men to just "get it" instead of bluntly asking, because it does "kill" the vibe. So men have to simultaneously directly ask for consent, but also not ask and just get the subtle hints women do that COULD IMPLY consent. Men get confused becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:12 PM
11

What does that have to do with not wanting women to change hobbies that men enjoy?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 10:16 PM
1

So it never occurred to you that perhaps your group give leeway to garbage women because she’s hot and very sexually active? If they hang out with those women? Yeah. I never denied it. It's you that believes that every single red piller is looking and only fucking hookers or gold diggers. So this was the lie. No lie. I hold both. If I see it irl, I complain to the proper channels. That's it. Yes, shallow people exist. So why are you holding the general public accountable for what shallow individ…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:15 PM
3

You brought up that the majority of killings in DV situations is because of firearms. A person that gets shot but doesn't die, is not INCLUDED in a killing statistic. How are you this obtuse?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:03 PM
1

OH! People can pick apart my arguments, but I can’t do the same to them! Picking apart argument is not the same as being wildy obtuse because you cannot engage in the argument. Which is precisely what you are doing to me. like what youre doing right now by making this conversation just about me? No, because I brought up your behavior since the first comment I made to you. But good try.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:01 PM
2

So you admit this is a bullshit statement: Women do generally GIVE MORE LEEWAY to men they find attractive and let them push/cross their boundaries more than the guy that is not as attractive. No. That is literally part of the phenomenon called "The Halo effect" which is an actual thing studied on sociology. Because you were holding women accountable for the actions of the few you know instead of looking at those women as individuals. People GENERALLY give more leeway to attractive individuals. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:59 PM
3

Getting shot = getting killed. Damn nice logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:52 PM
1

This isn't the first post I have engaged from you. And you do the same routine shit. You make a post that is wildly dumb and made to troll. People respond and pick apart your arguments. You respond to them by nit picking the most minute detail they might have gotten wrong, or you simply railroad the conversation into another topic that has nothing to do with what they said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:51 PM
2

So you understand individual accountability, so why are you making blanket statements about a whole gender? Because one has nothing to do with the other. I hold personally hold accountable the women that behave and spout those views the same as I do to men. They still behave do it regardless. He was mad sororities wouldnt fuck him because he was a short asian ‘gentlemen’ and the redpill encouraged that type of thinking. He did not come up with the 8020 rule on his own. He was already mentally di…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:49 PM
1

So why do you care about morals if you around ragebaiting and posting troll posts? Is it because you are sadistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:40 PM
2

So is your experience that women who have later told you they had casual sex originally told you they didn’t, so they lied? Either they outwardly did, or lied by omission. Tomato tomato. Or is the issue that they didn’t sleep with you fast enough compared to what you think was the timeline for a previous man? I apply the same standards to the women I date. I don't change them if they are hotter or uglier. I'd like a partner that does the same to her potential dates. That's all. also group sex is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:39 PM
2

You admit redpill doesn’t care about character. For some reason, you don’t see the cause and effect of that. If I place a pencil outside, and somebody picks it up to stab somebody else. That's on them. If I place a pencil outside and somebody starts writing a novel with it, that's on them. Trump got the make youth vote by being on podcasts. Trump got the vote because the common leftist rhetoric was to blame all of societal's problem on men, and white people. Elliot Rodgers used the 80/20 rules a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:31 PM
4

Because it's easier to wrestle a gun out of a woman than it is to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:09 PM
4

I do wonder how you guys even are getting this information. Are you interrogating women on dates about how quickly they’ve slept with each previous partner? Well, for one, I generally appear to be very open to women. So often times they will tell me that themselves. It might not be on the first date, or the second, but they do eventually. The woman that took the longest to tell me was dating me for 5 months, when she just casually dropped that she regularly slept around and even had a foursome w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:05 PM
3

Dude, popular redpillers get with bimbos and sex workers. Like Fresh and Fit and Andrew Tate. Redpill is about giving men the tools to date what they want. If they wish to date hookers and bimbos that's their prerrogative. I don't date those types of women. If men read the books, and apply what they teach, they will get results. Following social influencers is retarded, especially grifters. I don't even watch any of those fuckers. Fresh and fit were already getting clowned on for years during co…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:50 PM
2

It’s that the redpillers’ mindset funnels them toward people who with low standards and high dysfunction. Except it doesn't. Like I said before. If a redpiller wants to date the hot girl with strict standards, and they are attractive and followed RP's teachings, he will have a BETTER CHANCE to get a date or even possibly enter a relationship with that woman BECAUSE PEOPLE generally give more leeway to attractive people. So in the case that he doesn't live to one of her strict standards, that doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:42 PM
2

I actually didn't read that part. That was my bad. Thought it was something about the references you had made. This problem might also related to the types of women they know. Redpill men complain about women “choosing wrong,” but they can’t even detect wrong unless it comes with a mugshot. That’s why they keep seeing women who dont care about moral standards and never women who do. Do some women generally prefer or completely ignore the massive red flags those guys have? Yes absolutely. But tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:27 PM
0

You entered a conversation that EXPLICITLY was comparing rates of WOMEN KILLING MEN AND MEN KILLING WOMEN, and the COMMENT YOU RESPONDED to EXPLICITLY SPECIFIED DV KILLINGS, because those are the most STRAIGHTFORWARD events of INTER-GENDER violence. You completely tried to skew the conversation away to a completely unrelated topic because you couldn't respond properly to what the conversation had NATURALLY flowed to. But you were annoyed enough to make a response that you thought it would be a "…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:21 PM
5

Social competence starts with accurately identifying what is unacceptable, what is admirable, and what is merely baseline. It's not social competence. It's called Social Values If you can’t detect disrespect, boundary-testing, or antisocial behavior in other men, you won’t detect it in yourself so you’ll keep mislabeling your failures as “women are unreasonable” and “women are liars about caring about morals and good men” instead of “my behavior was off.” Both things can be true. Women do genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:18 PM
1

You do know that the same issue happens with married men right? To an even greater degree?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:03 PM
7

On the topic of killings in DV situations? Yes. Hence why you pivoted to a completely unrelated topic as mass shootings. But nice attempt at pivoting from the argument the conversation was about. Whataboutism at its finest. Chihuahuas are very territorial and aggressive, but they are seen as cute because they are small and have no force on their bites. If they were the size of a husky or a golden retriever, they would be seen as dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:00 PM
0

She’s gotta get instant lusty vaginal tingles and always want to fuck on command, simultaneously have no history of giving that treatment to any other man It's the consistency that is the issue. If I date a girl that when she is attracted to a guy she still abstains from sex with the guy until she gets to know him better? Sure. All the way. If I date a girl that when she is attracted to a guy she sleeps with him quickly or in a straightforward matter but decides that for me, she "should get me t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:54 PM
3

Closest equivalent is probably lift and lurk. Although he never posts, he constantly tries to ragebait..
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 12:34 PM
7

Lillith can stir up interesting conversations and argue her points, which is more than can be said for most posters. Disagree entirely. Lilith does her best to not willingly engage in discussions. She always manages to railroad criticisms against her by repeatly asking for more and more "sources" or "proofs" to the point it's highly predictable, or she straight up sidesteps the criticism entirely by changing the topic or focusing on the most minute of details that a critic might have gotten wron…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:13 AM
9

Lilith is a well-known ppd poster that often just makes posts deliberately made to antagonize men in general, aka trolling/ragebaiting, but somehow that account is never striked and never banned from posting. It's extremely apparent that the mods know about it. They just allow her to keep posting despite the blatant rule breaks. You can tell what post is a Lilith post because they are the ONLY posts that are only commented by men and her. Women don't engage in any sort of way on her posts, becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:57 AM
13

I actually wasn't ascribing a very deranged worldview about women in this case It's not about how deranged it was. It's the assumption at all that I have an issue with. Not every guy or boy that doesn't like to socialize hopes to find a partner and looks for advice, automatically means that they MUST have an erroneous or fantasy about women. That's the core of the issue when it comes to BP thinking. The "Just World" fallacy in full display. A guy that is struggling is not struggling because he i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:54 PM
10

Hence why I'm not denying what she said, I just take issue with automatically assuming that a guy that doesn't like to socialize MUST HAVE unrealistic expectations or fantasies of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:43 PM
15

They don't take it because it's difficult to enact, slow to yield results, and often requires the sacrifice of some very deeply held fantasies and ideals about women. This directly contradicts: We'll all tell you to change your lifestyle if this isn't the case...the problem is that the people who need this advice are the least likely to take it because they generally don't enjoy socializing that much. A guy can have perfectly normal worldviews when it comes to women, but it matters little if he …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:54 PM
1

Well, technically, the three kings met each other before ever being present for Christ's birth and were from each major continent at the time, so one was from Asia, the other from Europe and the last from Africa.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:32 PM
8

HCOL entails that a high earning salary there has the same purchasing powers as a middle class in a lower cost area. It's not the "benefits" you think it is, and I live in Mass. It's also highly contextual. A woman that lives in an HCOL area will obviously want their man to be earning much higher than the median income there, despite it already having a higher than average median income to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 05:43 AM
16

or most importantly... married or already in a relationship or a majority of the men that earn that much skewing towards old age.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 05:18 AM
1

Okay, so that person didn't graduate middle school english. Got it. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:47 PM
7

You know what, at least she's honest with herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:46 PM
2

Can somebody do me a favor and read these two sentences and tell me what it says in simple english? For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). . For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. I had thought both statements were clear: In the first quote, both genders described …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 11:40 PM
7

If the justification for using those insults is just to hurt that person. Then the N word would 100% apply in the same situation even more so because of it's historical context. It's just sexism plain and simple. Sexism against men is permitted in the social lexicon, but racism against a minority is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 12:08 AM
2

Unless you properly went to a nutritionist that evaluated your body type, you wouldn't know how healthy you really are or where your BMI should be. Just because there is a general healthy BMI index for the average woman, that doesn't mean it will apply to you. Same thing goes with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 12:06 AM
12

I agree I just think it's funny how it's only RP guys that get those kinds of insults here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:16 PM
9

Wouldn't that also apply to all the BP and women here?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:42 PM
4

Was your husband medically diagnosed? Or is he riding the quirky mental disability popularity wave like many people do with ADHD? How was he successful? Like actual details. 3. I thought the red pill was about changing your circumstances and adapting to your environment. Instead, all I ever see y'all do is whine and complain about women. Pray tell, if you go to a restaurant are you surprised when you see... people eating? If you go to a library, are you surprised when people... read books? This …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:39 PM
1

women thought being attractive is not that important but the study revealed attractiveness is important. That is not what it says yet again. Read slowly and carefully. They asked both men and women for what their ideal partner would be. They then compared them to people they actually found attractive and turns out BOTH genders underestimated what they actually ended up thinking was attractive. However, out of the two, WOMEN were vastly underestimating what they had stated. Hence, if you read fur…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 05:20 PM
1

they still get in relationships w men that are NOT those ideals (which is what the "underestimation" refers to)... Read this again slowly... For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). "Underestimated revealed preferences" is completely the opposite from what you thunk it was. If the women stated that their ideals were much HIGHER than what they actually ende…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 05:09 PM
1

you dumb fuck they dont state WHAT THOSE PEOPLE CONSIDER ATTRACTIVE ...I AM SAYING YOU SHOULD BE ATTRACTED TO THE PERSON YOU ARE DATING BUT ATTRACTIVENESS LOOKS DIFFERENT FOR EVERY PERSON!!! Yo, the entire point is that women STATE that what they have more VARIED preferences for attractiveness than what they actually want. When women state that some of them liek "dad bods" they don't think of the beer gut, they think of Henry Cavill shirtless. That's the entire point. They vastly underestimate t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:57 PM
1

For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. Implications for the literature on human mating are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved). Must be that 2nd grade average reading school level I keep hea…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:52 PM
1

"A Worldwide Test of the Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preference-Matching" Eastwick Et Al. | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2024
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:31 PM
2

i constantly see And we all know that personal anecdotes offer more empirical knowledge and wisdom than studies and surveys made on the subjects studied. You are completely right. 5th time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:23 PM
2

go workout then why the fuck should it be my problem that you cant get dates lol and why are you assuming that the majority of other women will find my type attractive Because generally speaking women find attractive the same PHYSICAL FEATURES on men, and studies have how's how MEN are the ones that have MORE VARYING DEGREES of physical preferences compared to women. 4th time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:16 PM
–

So they repeat that pattern. Funny how men don't have that problem This is exactly why women teach each other to be pickier, so they can do better. It’s in women’s best interest to do so. By being pickier on physical requirements that have little to do with the morality of the man in question. Which loops them back on the same.problem over and over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:11 PM
–

why should i as a woman be expected to go out with someone who's not my type You have demonstrated now for the third time your mental incapacity. The guys that you find attractive, generally speaking, most women find attractive, ergo those men are the ones getting multiple offers from women or have little to no resistance GETTING first dates. Meaning that the "bar is in hell" concept applies to THEM, not all men. If you are married with children, I hope your husband or father of your children is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:08 PM
–

I don’t think it’s strange that women are more surprised by that. Men often lie and misrepresent their intentions for sex, then change gears after they get their dick wet. Men admit that here all the time. . "Men lie all the time we all know it" sees that an attractive guy is looking at their general direction and flirts with them The girl sleeps with them, the man curves her and ignores her "Men are all horrible and shitty. Yall suck." sees that an attractive guy is looking at their general dir…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:04 PM
–

? are you retarded? what type of effort do you expect people to put in? You don't seem to have enough mental capacity to understand that you are AGREEING with OP. The bar is in hell for attractive men because these men are the ones that women are WILLING to go on a date with in the first place. Good Lord.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:58 PM
2

what if i never had any issues finding a partner since becoming a legal age? are my standards still unrealistic? Online they are, which is what you were complaining about. Meaning that it is more likely that the men you meet IRL and date, have flaws that you are still willing to overlook compared to reading about their flaws online. i think men should just work to improve their looks and desirability just like we do. Men are going working out now more than ever before. Women work on their looks …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:56 PM
–

It still applies, you know. The standard is in hell for the attractive men. All the guy has to do is clean his nails, but he's attractive so he doesn't even have to put effort to get a date in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:52 PM
–

How is it not the point? You’re acting like it’s bad for women to complain about a bad experience they had. No, I'm saying that women ACTING SURPRISED that the hot, attractive guy that was way more attractive than them treated them like shit and complaining about it is a problem. If men would routine put their hands on a hot stove and go online to complain how all stoves are horrible and burn them, would they be in the right? Of course not. They choose to put their hands on hot stoves. It's thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:50 PM
0

okay, you can have your pick in an all you can eat buffet, but its all foods you dont like at all. be happy, come on, be happy! Again, it's the "don't like at all" that is the issue at hand. It is statistically impossible that you found so few people that you had a moderate interest in unless your standards were so unbelievably unrealistic in the first place. The point is that women get to choose what standards they apply. But if those standards can only be filled by like 1% of the single male p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:47 PM
–

I think it’s fine to be upset if you had a shitty ex. Not the point I was talking about and you know it. A lot more women can’t relate to that. My guy, the entire point is that BOTH genders go through that, but only women loudly complain when attractive men run through them like a hot knife on butter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:42 PM
–

You literally said "another date" Meaning you ALREADY agreed to go out on a date with them in the first place. The point is that women don't think about these sorts of things, with average or unattractive men. They simply act as they don't exist. But when an attractive guy comes along, they immediately agree to a date and then apply their standards depending on how egregious their behavior is after.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:40 PM
0

i did it with all the men and women that seemed nice fun. So you flirt with every guy or girl you meet then? I asked a pretty precise question. Did you act that way with any person that approached you to date or just the ones where you found them attractive enough to date? but, to answer your question, women match out of desperation Lmao. Didn't know that having the opportunity to have your pick of the litter, to choose any food from an all you can eat buffet and still whining about what you cho…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:37 PM
–

Men also put up with more from women they find attractive. And you don't see these men complaining when it bites them back in the ass. Hence why there is ALWAYS the joke of at least one guy commenting on any image depicting a morally questionable or goth/alternative but attractive woman: "She can ruin me." Men know what they get into when they look willingly enter messy relationships with these women. That's the issue. Women love to complain when they put up with the antics of an attractive man …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:32 PM
–

if i see an attractive man with dirty fingernails im not going on another date w him Key word there being: Another
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:29 PM
6

Abbot Elementary had a pretty good joke about this entire issue: https://youtube.com/shorts/DlOt4rG9EVo?si=nJEswHx_uzF4zlHZ The point is, even if women aren't "gold diggers," they still vastly spend LESS money than the men they go out with during those activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:24 PM
1

. i personally always had witty banter when dating, but in most cases i was the one trying to make things playful. Whith ALL of the men have approached you? Or just the ones you found attractive or worthy enough in the first place to engage? That's the crux of the issue that you are not getting. Obviously, if a woman is interested and sexually attracted in a guy who's talking with her, they will do their best to engage and build rapport. But the majority of times, when women match with men, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:22 PM
1

Why even be mad though over not clicking with people who are obviously garbage prospects anyway? Because the men still had to do the song and dance to get to that point anyways. So men tend to put more money and time to get to the initial parts of dating and still have a majority of their time wasted on that kind of person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:18 PM
2

An average man can be more or less attractive based on how he presents. It depends. You know this already. True, just like it's true that men doing their best to please the woman they are dating doesn't mean they are regularly sleeping together. In fact, it's often the opposite. Most guys that are in deadbedroom relationships tend to also do most of the house workload, yet it matters little to the women they date. Women routinely state how just because men provide effort, either financial/materi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 02:30 PM
10

Gen Z men are even more jaded than millennial men, and they both drink less/go out less. The "rise" of the red pill in the online space did not happen because of millennial men. It happened because it resonated with younger gen z men. The millennial men just hopped on the train and grifted (profited) out of it online.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 02:03 PM
7

They actually have to add something positive in our lives to make the effort of approaching worth it, and a lot of gen z women just aren't worth approaching. That's ghe crux of the issue isn't it? Women always talk about how the issue is that many men don't bring anything positive to them, so why should they entertain then? When the issue is even more prevalent on men because THEY are the ones that approach first. A woman complains that the 4 guys that approached her were not up to her standards…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 01:57 PM
3

If that were true, soooooo many more men would be getting sex. Because we all know that sexual attraction from women can be negotiated lmao right? No effort. No imagination. Just come to collect sex, attention, service. Said by the same person that scrolls IG all day, spends her time watching Netflix and only thinks about her BF when it comes to wanting something from him. verage women do NOT get treated like models and average men demanding to be treated like Chad are delusional. They get treat…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 01:50 PM
2

Men certainly aren't treating the average woman like models. Isn't the common narrative here even by BP about that topic is that a large majority of men have literally no standards and let women walk all over them at all times, creating the very same problems we talk about? So yeah, they apparently do treat them like models because they apply little to no standards at all to women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 01:04 PM
2

The line about waiting below is an allusion to the classic balcony style scene given the references to windows - she wants him to declare his love. Which means she wants him to court her. Which he doesn't. And in that we find him courting her, he's the devil rolling his dice and she's the angel rolling her eyes at him. Lmfao, that is NOT what she means by that. She's talking about the actual devil and angel on a person's shoulder. The devils play, and they know the person affected will fall for …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 03:34 PM
1

You seem to be viciously agreeing with me. Did you read my comments at all? "There's nothing to debate with." "It is a rant because it does not provide anything substantial to debate..." You are however very triggered by this OP which isn’t even that biting. How is it triggering me when I specifically picked apart each point and pointed out how erroneous those parts were? If anything the fact that you are side-stepping and railroading the conversation with meaningless jabs at me instead of engag…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 09:10 PM
4

I’m highlighting how masculinity interacts with the world around us, including politics. Yet you use the most negative ways to describe those aspects: Self-centeredness What is self-centeredness in the context of society and how "men" interact with it? That men want to be given just as much value from society as they give in? Because it's not a wrong worldview. If I give in 100% of my time to something, I'd expect the returns to be the same. “defense” Of?... Less open to the POV of others No, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:41 PM
6

And what does this have to do with anything? Where's the issue? It's like saying that there are more women on the left than the right because it appeals to them and their worldview. There's nothing to debate. And sure aspects of masculinity might be culturally defined, but many aspects of it are predisposed impulses that are then further exacerbated by culture. I think this is what’s usually happening. What do you mean by this? "Some things may be affected by culture but culture affects them." L…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:23 PM
4

Fever dream high in the quiet of the night You know that I caught it (oh yeah, you're right, I want it) Bad, bad boy, shiny toy with a price You know that I bought it (oh yeah, you're right, I want it) Killing me slow, out the window I'm always waiting for you to be waiting below Devils roll the dice, angels roll their eyes What doesn't kill me makes me want you more And it's new, the shape of your body It's blue, the feeling I've got And it's ooh, whoa-oh It's a cruel summer "It's cool, " that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:01 PM
10

Why does it hurt men’s feelings so much that they have to work harder than Chris Evan’s and Michael b Jordan to get women Because it means that you apply standards arbitrarily to get what you want. Your entire argument hinges on men being traditionally the ones having to lead and to make dates exciting as part of the process, yet here you are justifying how attractive men DON'T HAVE TO do this song and dance, while insulting the men that do point it out in the first place. It's not an insane tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:50 PM
4

Most modern women will offer to pay for at least something in the date, they just don't want to autistically split bills down the middle and have servers make corrections of a few cents to make sure it's 100% even. Don't know what kind of places you normally eat at, but in my experience, when you tell a server to split the bill, it simply means that each seat pays for what they ordered. It's not 50/50 split. It means that if I order a $40 meal, and she orders a $30 meal, I pay $40, and she pays …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:42 PM
3

I just reposnd with: "Oh if you mean if I'm for equality between the genders? Absolutely." That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:43 PM
4

Which loops back to the original point...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:41 PM
7

I do. You do understand that the problem doesn't come from men being picky right? The whole point is that a vast majority of women have a height filter, and a large chunk of them straight up just disregard any man below 6 feet. Your advice is non-advixe. Again. Because men aren't all picky. The women that want to date short men are just vastly smaller than the amount of shorter men to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:25 PM
8

If a woman rejects you solely based on height, then it might not be the kind of woman you want to chase after. This is literally saying nothing. The vast majority of women do have a height preference. The standard "My height plus at least 3 inches" is a thing for women "because of heels". Saying "Don't focus on these women" is non-advice. They are already trying to find women that will like them despite their height. They just CAN'T FIND THEM because they are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:09 PM
13

In pill communities, there is constant talk of how 60% of young Gen z men are single and how women are dating older or richer or higher status. Yet, when I leave my house, I see the same familiar sight every day. Men who are less attractive, short, poorly dressed with attractive women. Considering that women tend to vastly over-rate their own attractiveness and their female peers, I'd be willing to bet that it's not as clear cut as you make it. Specially when women tend to artificially inflate t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:03 PM
20

Because the redpill is primarily focused on dating women. Men's right groups do talk about biphobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 12:46 PM
–

Damn, where's that woman that was enraged that a tennis pro didn't think Serena was the best tennis player ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 10:29 AM
-1

And again- I see men complaining about that constantly. If you meant the example you brought up, I just showed you an article referencing two studies on the subject, PROVING that women that do enter marriage LOWER their LIBIDO and KEEP LOWERING IT as they approach the 5 marriage year mark. In a vacuum, men that do complain about their wives wanting less sex after getting married, is a fact backed by science.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:50 PM
3

There are Some Professional Female Marathon Runners who can run a sub 2:20 Marathon. TBF Marathons or any kind of endurance-running focused sport, women do have the advantage, due to needing less calories and having significantly less upper muscle density, so they can go on for longer. Same reason why the gap between men and women competing in swimming events closes as you increase the distance of the events. Women have better buoyancy, so they require less energy to keep themselves afloat in wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:47 PM
1

Point it out so I can laugh at him too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:45 PM
-1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cultural-animal/202201/how-sexual-desire-changes-after-marriage First article that I searched on the subject. So at least in a vacuum, women do tend to want less sex after getting married and the rate keeps lowering as they approach the 5 year marriage mark. So at least in that case, it's not a case of a guy knowingly entering a marriage with a woman that had already proved by behavior, that she had a low libido, but rather their libido does start to decli…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:41 PM
–

What does your incoherent rant have to do with what I said? I simply stated that the equivalent of a guy playing video games, would be a woman watching netflix all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:37 PM
-1

Men and women are both guilty of marrying people for the future version of them that they conjure up in their minds as opposed to marrying them as they are. The difference between the two is that men don't go out in public and then state how "deceived" they were and how she was literally the "perfect" girl while having more blatant red flags than a chinese communist party. Hell, there's a reason why a big meme said to any hot but questionable woman is: "She can ruin me." Men are self-aware when …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:36 PM
1

Is there something in your world that is a fault of men? The entitlement of women is certainly a fault of the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:33 PM
–

The equivalency for girls might be Tiktok and shopping. No, it would be watching netflix all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:18 PM
–

Learning a language is code for foreign accent. So it's like a kink thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:17 PM
–

In one study, video games were the least attractive. In the other, manosphere was the least attractive. Not surprising in the slightest. When women think about a guy playing video games, they think of the basement dweler that never goes out. When women think about a guy that is in the manosphere they picture a self-absorbed manlet with a misogynistic attitude that only uses the word "females" to refer to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:15 PM
11

It's a boring answer, but honestly, it’s a lot more sustainable than the crazy expectations people post about on here. Same boat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:13 PM
4

Also, how male professional athletes perform says nothing about every other man and just because he can beat Serena doesn't mean YOU could. But we are not talking about every woman and every man... we are talking about the pro athletes that are PAID to compete against one another... Serena and most of the women who play professional tennis would kick your ass in a match Who is saying that they could beat Serena in a match in this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:08 PM
14

Like couldn’t he have just said the men’s and women’s tennis games are “different”? He was specifically asked "If she was the greatest tennis player ever." and explained that she was the greatest female player ever. He literally acknowledged how "different" the male and female division is without putting Serena down. The interviewer forced him to explain why she wasn't "just" the greatest tennis player. He didn’t have to explain that men are better and that women wouldn’t perform as well if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:04 PM
–

Girl, you have half of my reddit karma, and you made your account in 2024. If anybody here has no life. It's you. Glass houses and all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:16 AM
2

Pattern recognition from watching women behave around men they are attracted to, and those they are not attracted to. Same as always.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:03 PM
7

She’s not antagonizing anyone. She deliberaly antagonizes men in her posts. What are you on about? Why are you bending so hard against something that most regular members know that is true. There is a reason why every other debate post made here has almost a 50/50 split between the genders yet in her posts, the only people that comment are the ragebaited men and her. Women don't contribute anything to her posts. Why? Because they are made with the intent to ragebait men. You literally described …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:57 PM
4

Which by mentioning what they desire, they... INVITE men to act that way onto her, even if she is not attracted to the men in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:47 PM
2

... and yet one is accepted, and one isn't... how convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:46 PM
4

“Bait” isn’t trolling. It’s just low hanging fruit. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/troll troll verb trolled; trolling; trolls transitive verb a: to antagonize (others) online by deliberately posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content … trolls engage in the most outrageous and offensive behaviors possible—all the better to troll you with.— Whitney Phillips b: to act as a troll (see troll entry 3 sense 1) on (a forum, site, etc.) … is also notor…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:44 PM
8

They aren’t in romcoms anymore because they’d hit too close to home, and we can’t unsee the problematic behavior as a culture. Maybe in hollywood, but that's not where women flock for Romance movies or tv-shows. They look at K-dramas for that, where the trope is not just present, but it's almost universally ever present in every single show or movie dealing with romance. What conclusions are you drawing from that? Because a lot of times when guys bring this up, it sounds like they think women se…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:36 PM
3

Is there an aversion to men going celibate? Alot of issues would be solved if men went sexless Trust me, if I had a wish that could be granted, I would wish for men's sexual drives to be even lower than women. The economy would tank by itself if all men collectively decided to not try as hard for a white picket fence dream to settle down with and just had a small cozy apartment where they do their own thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:22 PM
4

The issue is i didn't ask for it and that seems like switching the topic. I'm not tho. I did not deny nor dimiss the ideas that you made. Women DO complain about all of those issues on the men they are with. I simply provided an explanation that the kind of men that are willing to provide better treatment for women, are simply not being chosen. I tell you how, it's not, but you can't stand when men are to blame so you shift the blame on women for...men's actions. I literally was one of the few T…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:20 PM
3

A word that was often used in the old days to explain to other TRP men how women act that does not seem to get used much anymore is "biotruths". Which is because...? Because posts that end up on that type of conclusions, would be teethering on breaking rules like, number 7, number 3 or number 11. and would also break some of the guidelines of this sub, specifically, number 5, number 8 and number 14. Which again, begs the question of why she is allowed to repeatedly violate not only the "no troll…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:09 PM
1

If negative posts about men are considered trolling, then negative posts about women would also be considered trolling, and this sub, which was founded to debate TRP's negative views about women, would not exist. The difference between what Lilith usually posts and TRP posts that go along the same lines but for women, is that TRP posts have to go out of their own way to not simply land on the conclusion of: "Women are irrational because they are women and women are stupid." or have to specifical…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:00 PM
4

That's basics of courtship, if a man asks a woman out he pays and she says thank you- that's it. Which is why it's entirely reasonable for men to put less effort. In your example, the guy should have taken her to a coffee shop or out for ice cream or a walk in the park, etc. Having to work for potentially hours, in order to afford a basic mid-tier dinner date, having to approach the women, risk humiliation or rejection,and then having to do the metaphorical clown dance, just to keep her interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:56 PM
3

"men like doing things for women"....so that's why women constantly talk about shit gifts, about lack of effort on christmas and 0 gifts for a woman, weaponized incompetence, no flowers, and also why men scream gold digger for any reason they want? Simplest, but hand-wavy explanation is that the men that get into these relationships are not the kind that actually want to treat women good. So it would be up to the women to vet better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:50 PM
4

Her topics are the female equivalent of the “women are incapable of being rational!” dudes. And yet those types of posts get immediately taken down. Yeah because she’s intentionally triggering insecure men into taking her bait. Which again begs the question why the mods haven't banned her for repeatedly violating rule number 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:43 PM
19

On an anonymous web forum like Reddit the advice is always going to be somewhat generic because we don’t know the OP personally. As if most of the advice people give outside of social media is not exactly the same: "Don't try too hard." "The one will come, just be patient." "You are perfect the way you are."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:43 PM
14

If you respected ethical boundaries, then you shouldn’t feel bad if one person took offense to you asking if she wants to dance. Often times, it's not that the men get offended, it's that the women that react to that, do so very publicly and loudly to humiliate the man in question... they weaponize their immediate public environment to attack the man, even if the man did everything "ethically" right. 3: Media depicts “guys who don’t take no for an answer,” as romantic leads. The takeaway for guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:34 PM
6

But saying “I like X trait in a man” isn’t “begging” for anything. "Begging" might now be the right term, but the word "invites" is certainly appropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:32 PM
40

Most men have no problem with direct confrontation and saying the things outloud. Many do, but as they later learn in life, it's just not worth it sometimes. I remember how I was criticized by my friends that were women, after I told them that I had caught an girlfriend trying to cheat. I simply texted her that we were over, to not contact me again, and blocked her ass. I gave her no explanation, no reasoning, nothing. My friends were telling me that I was an asshole because I didn't have a conv…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:22 PM
5

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/ It's the same source the other guy posted. Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. You have to be trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 10:19 AM
–

???? What made-up numbers are you talking about? Not only are you incapable of understanding what the words "reciprocal" and "non-reciprocal" means when it comes to domestic violence, but somehow you are so illiterate that you cannot understand that my reply was meant to DUMB DOWN the quoted source you smugly and ignorantly thought proved your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:19 AM
4

When both partners hit each other, 49% of cases. When one partner hits, women were the abuser in 70% of cases... You need to read better...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:48 AM
3

I didn't see the "certain" (another spelling error lol) the first time I read. Certain is a real word tho... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/certain Now do you have a rebuttal to any of my points or are you just going to call me dumb for not reading your mind and understanding what your typo meant? I literally did right after: That's literally what I said. The more responsive a person was in their study, the more pleasant and nice they were. The whole point is that the less "nice" or …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:55 PM
3

Wtf does that even mean lmfao. It's clearly a typo, which you did understand it so because you chose to remove the following noun that provides the context that clearly highlights the typing error. Nobody says, "Quiet certain terms." But people do say "In quite certain terms." But good job being intentionally obtuse. And then they just decided to use "niceness" and responsiveness interchangeably. Did you even read it? That's literally what I said. The more responsive a person was in their study,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:01 PM
3

The first three are about adolescents, not women. Two things: The idea teen girls suddenly make an 180° on their dating preferences once they become a legal adult is a lie. The third source I used, also used university students. The second source used a median age of 18 for women. Aka adult women. But again, shows your complete lack of reading skills. says itself that narcissism is correlated with extroversion and that's likely what people were selecting for (it said that machivellianism and psy…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:05 PM
9

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/brock-bullies-sex-1.4487053 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283732665_How_Alluring_Are_Dark_Personalities_The_Dark_Triad_and_Attractiveness_in_Speed_Dating https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds-men-nice-women-not-other-way-around-261269 https://www.spring.org.uk/2017/12/quality-women-more-attractive.php https://www.researchgate.n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 05:59 AM
3

You must be very old if you don't get that meme. It's a joke about being one of millions of women with the same tastes and claiming it's unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 04:36 AM
–

All women are Queens and drop-dead gorgeous!!!! /s do you deep within you know that you are not that beautiful but say that to appear beautiful or is it something you actually believe that you are beautiful maybe due to external reasons like friends, family, etc. You must know what I am talking about. It's all about optics. Women love to defend one another and delude themselves. If you really want to know what they think, show them a picture of a woman that is clearly unattractive/fat, ask them …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:44 AM
5

Not sure how that = me "justifying" You justified those sentiments when you went out of your way to type this: However- women being hostile to men hurts their feelings; men's hostility to women, in contrast, is frequently deadly You minimized the issue and the clear hypocrisy in the treatments along the genders, by stating that a man hating women is a clear sign of them being violent, but a woman hating men is simply just hurting feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:38 AM
9

Let's see those studies saying that women prefer selfish men. Studies, implies multiple, aka more than one. Gave you multiple studies in case you tried to dismiss some of them. I went further than what I was required to do in this conversation. Yet here you are, not even doing the bare minimum after supposedly "wanting to see those studies". first 3 talk about being a lying psychopaths, not what we were discussing, at all. You either have veeeery low intelligence overall or you are being intenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:35 AM
8

but in your example you are mad that men are held to a "boys don't cry" standard. You are mixing everything up. Men are held to a concept of them being adults. Women don't. Being an adult is acting like one. You don't get to cry just because you are mildly stressed, then have the world around you bend to your whims and help you out. That's what young children experience. Women want to be adults, when it suits them, if it doesn't suit them, they revert to being children, in which case they are tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:28 AM
11

???? I posted MULTIPLE studies indicating along the lines of the same conclusions. It's your job to read them out. The lazy person here is you. You wanted multiple studies about the topic, and their conclusions. I gave you some. Your job is at the very least read the damn abstract. You don't get to dimiss them simply because "Too long don't like to read. Give me a summery of multiple studies all researching a multifaceted problem in which all have to land on the same very small conclusion becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:25 AM
3

I'm actually dismissing what you've said because it has nothing to do with my post. My post is that women are people and men who stay angry at women all the time seem to forget that. Your comment has nothing to do with my post. I did not respond to your post. I responded to your own question: I have seen no real evidence to suggest that "most women don't treat men like humans." Can you provide examples of dehumanizing behavior perpetrated by women on men on any sort of a scale? Read better.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:18 AM
6

Is that flip-flop happening online? No. The majority of times happens in real life as well. It's not ragebait. Women do operate in that way. When a woman breaks down crying at work because she's stressed and everybody flocks to cuddle her and help her, yet if a man were to break down in the same way for the same reason, a majority of them would make fun of that man. When it is socially acceptable for a woman to physically abuse their male partner out in public without having a bystander intervin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:16 AM
2

I believe the claim is "most women ..." Are you suggesting most women want to kill all men? First of all, if you are going to make a claim of what I wrote, at least do it properly: The common sentiment of "Kill all men." "Men are trash." "I choose the bear." "Men are pigs." "Men don't deserve anything." that is prevalent in our society, not just the online space, is more than ample evidence of such dehumanizing behavior stemming from women. "Kill all men" is a hyperbolic statement in itself, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:10 AM
9

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/brock-bullies-sex-1.4487053 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283732665_How_Alluring_Are_Dark_Personalities_The_Dark_Triad_and_Attractiveness_in_Speed_Dating https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds-men-nice-women-not-other-way-around-261269 https://www.spring.org.uk/2017/12/quality-women-more-attractive.php https://www.researchgate.n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:00 AM
6

However- women being hostile to men hurts their feelings; men's hostility to women, in contrast, is frequently deadly The absolute irony of dismissing how dehumanizing behavior is commonly accepted and justified when it's done to men, and then actively proving how people justify said dehumanization of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:53 AM
8

Have you considered that some women are assholes too? And some guys are liars? Both of those things are not mutually exclusive. That has nothing to do with the argument I made. If a minority of women where the ones that primarily selected that way, it would show up on studies and surveys made on the matter. But the opposite is correct. A majority of women find selfish men more attractive than unselfish men. Yes, some men lie. Some men lie very well. The majority of men don't lie or fake it that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:51 AM
8

I have seen no real evidence to suggest that "most women don't treat men like humans." Can you provide examples of dehumanizing behavior perpetrated by women on men on any sort of a scale? The common sentiment of "Kill all men." "Men are trash." "I choose the bear." "Men are pigs." "Men don't deserve anything." that is prevalent in our society, not just the online space, is more than ample evidence of such dehumanizing behavior stemming from women. If a woman is actively hostile to men, or has a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:42 AM
4

While I cannot promise someone will fuck you for putting my suggestions into practice, your friendships and work relationships will improve significantly-- and at least you will stop actively alienating people who may consider fucking you. It's hilarious how stupid her argument is. Does she not realize that the majority of men have gripes with the way women flip-flop between "being a independent person" and "i'm just a wittle baby don't hold me accountable" attitude that is fairly common in soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:35 AM
8

That's awful bro. I hope things get better for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:28 AM
5

Anyway seems like she is specifically targeting tall, lean, self sufficient stem men. https://media.tenor.com/R4bqdpchzfoAAAAM/buzz-lightyear-factory.gif She's targeting the same men that every other woman wants with maybe less than 5% of men having at least two of those requirements and that's without even secluding SINGLE and AGF appropriate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:22 AM
7

Women like the confident guy who helps at the animal shelter and is sensitive and caring The issue is that women put more importance on confidence itself, rather than WHERE that confidence is used on or by. Meaning a large chunk of women would find a guy that is an asshole and confident attractive compared to a guy who is not confident, is nice and works at an animal shelter. Being nice, or being pleasant is not a hard requirement, it's just a plus. It's conditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:18 AM
19

Who cares that sexually selecting for men like that is asking for a world of hurt?? Their argument is the opposite of that tho... Their argument is that women, particularly the younger they are, tend to self-select the assholes, the ones that display more outwardly selfish/sociopathic traits, which potentially leads to the men who do not display those traits, either because of their born-nature or were socially influenced to behave differently, to change the way they behave in order to become mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:11 AM
0

Not all crimes work like that. With rape it’s a recent culture shift, people tend to follow previous norms a lot. The majority of men that are between the ages of 16 to 45 have all lived after that culture shift. Meaning most of them never actually even knew that it was more "acceptable" to rape women. It's a complete nothingburger argument. You cannot tell me that men that are of military age right now rape just as much as men did so in the 1960s or even before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:49 PM
-1

Nope. If this was true there would be more conclusive data. Of? What? A man getting accused of rape? That happens all the time. I'm not talking about a man getting falsely accused. I'm talking about a victim pointing at a man and accusing them of SA. That happens all the time, and the world, quickly knows about it. And you know he was falsely accused how exactly? Because the guy had proof that the time where he had supposedly committed the act on the victim, he was in his own dorm, streaming him…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:44 PM
1

Honestly at this point men are more scared to be accused of rape than actually raping. True so far... I think it's because rape is okay, but being accused brings consequences for him. they don't see causation link. What. The. Fuck. is this gynocentrism and misandrist bullshit? Most men are more scared of being accused of sexually assaulting a woman than actually committing the crime, BECAUSE a MAJORITY OF MEN don't even think of committing the crime in the first place. For a man to sexually assa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:33 PM
1

Yet so many of you know people who have been falsely accused. Because often times when the guy is accused, the public knows about it and it blows up? Like how is that so hard to understand? Yeah, I knew a guy who lived on my floor who was accused of SA in my uni. His entire life was blown up, he became a social pariah and was kicked out of school, even before the law got officially involved. He had to go to the authorities himself in order to get a proper investigation outside of the college ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:27 PM
1

The law often can’t assign clear responsibility in those cases, the situation simply doesn’t fit neatly into criminal categories. That's where you are wrong, because in many parts of the world, the legal definition of rape is simply to specifically includes "To penetrate somebody". Which means that even in those situations where both people equally could not consent, the man is the one who is going to be treated as a criminal if the law gets involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:24 PM
2

Apparently not, since it was not "malicious" with the intent to cause direct harm, but rather it's the tale of plausible deniability. I did not want to harm that person, but it just so happened that what I did harmed him.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:21 PM
9

Why are people obligated to believe that men can be evil enough to rape, but women could never be evil enough to lie? Specially when it's far easier to lie than it is to forcibly perform a physical act on somebody else, regardless of criminal consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:18 PM
24

There's a reason why when somebody mentions the way women and modern society apply the "Just World" fallacy when it comes to unsuccessful men, no BP responds back to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:57 PM
4

Women are increasingly educated, skincare/beauty conscious, have a good group of friends/ sociable, financially stable and liberal That doesn't disprove how women date using the Apex fallacy. They don’t actually need someone better than them but they struggle to find someone equal to them Because they overvalue themselves... a man that has the same education, social status, looks, same level of experience, same financial situation is seen as a negative for most women. Ffs a large number of women…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:49 PM
1

Uh no. Red Pill is more about just getting into a relationship. Have you read the books at all? If red pill was all about just getting women to sleep with you it would just be PUA. Which is why so much of the essential reading list criticizes PUA and diverts from it. Like a simple concept that directly shuts your argument down from the red pill is the Dread Game. Dread game is used when you are generally in a relationship with a woman, and they begin to treat sex like a chip or start to constant…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:55 PM
1

I’m asking where you’ve seen this actually happen. Like, are men at work saying this to you at lunch and suddenly random people walking past interrupt you to lecture him? Yeah. Not random people but yeah, I've seen this happen first hand. Most people that criticised them were women tho. Are your friends talking about this and suddenly everyone except you just suddenly start screaming at him and telling him he’s entitled Yeah. Practically all the women in the group called them out on that yeah. L…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:53 PM
-1

Do you think women collectively use sex against men? I mean... yes? They do. But not completely. Like women do often treat sex as a reward for men and lack of sex as punishment. But does it happen literally all the time? No. It just depends on the context. Why do you think women don't have sex with you if they want it too? In this very specific scenario, of her wanting to have sex with a guy, but not being able to, it would probably be along the lines of: Work - Responsibilities Super Tired Cram…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:43 PM
5

That their initial aloofness is mostly self preservation, and that there's no malice on screening. TBF when it comes to inital dates, absolutely you are correct. But women do use sex as a bargaining chip sometimes. It just all depends on the context.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:40 PM
1

You mean other than the common statement said along the lines of: "Men are not entitled to sex just because of they paid the date?" Same reason why men don't talk about their feelings despite the overwhelming problem with their mental health and suicide rates. They simply don't speak out, because they know they get mocked for it and made lesser. Why would a man go online and state that he feels that a woman he was dating was using him and be opened up to made fun off and called lesser as a resul…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:35 PM
–

it's actually culturally shamed and stigmatized to get used for sex. Not really. At least not directly. If a woman comes out and says that the guy she was dating ghosted her after having sex, she doesn't get fun off because she was used for it. She gets fun off when context comes out and states that the guy was already flaky or a fuckboi, or even insanely more attractive than she was, so in that case the response is: "Well what did you expect?" But without further context, that's doesn't really …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:26 PM
–

Even women in this sub See, now I truly believe that you are not naive, you are simply being deliberately obtuse and strawmaning me. What do you think the word "EVEN" in that sentence means or implies? It implies that JUST LIKE IN THE REAL WORLD, women here who are more attentive of the gender dynamics JUSTIFY and STATE those same rationalizations done by women in the outside world.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:14 PM
1

https://youtu.be/VNJN1aV8YWI?si=2Oj9IWCqBEyOo9Xe&t=60
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:10 PM
–

Sounds terrifying. I’m glad the outside world I live in doesn’t sound like your outside world. I don’t think I’ve ever met a man OR woman who played this stupid “lemme try trading sex/money for relationships” in the first place. Then you are either naive or not very attentive. Even women in this sub have stated multiple times how men dropping a lot of money on their dates does not mean those men are entitled to sex, and any variations along those lines. But I am still very firmly on the “people …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:04 PM
–

I would too, on both situations. But we are not talking about people in this sub and how we should behave, we are talking about normal people outside, and how they react and judge those situations. In that case, what I said is generally true, it's far easier and far more acceptable to state that a woman has been used for sex, than a man being used for his money without mountains of criticisms or justifications landing his way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:01 PM
–

I have my dude. But again, this sub is a microcosm of a group of people already well versed, or at least more particularly attentive of the gender dynamics of society in the western world. We are talking about a very small diminutive group, which does not reflect how most people behave outside of our group. Which is why in the outside world, one is vilified, and the other is accepted. That's what I and what most people here that are responding to you, are also stating. It's simply the case that …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:58 PM
–

TBF the problem here, like most issues brought up in this sub, is that one is accepted and one is vilified. It's accepted when a woman states that somebody used them to have sex. But it's made fun off when a man says that a woman used him for his money. We can say that both are allowed to feel the way they want to feel, but the truth of the matter is that people weighing-in on the situation will almost always mock the guy and defend the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:43 PM
–

We are currently going back to the thin thing. No we aren't. We are right in the middle of the two if anything. Don't be morbidly obese, don't be starving yourself to the point you have more bones than muscle mass. And I feel like women are just tired. Fat acceptance was about women being represented in fashion. Women were represented in fashion. Fat acceptance was a way to normalize being morbidly obese, and of course, it's only for women, men still have to adhere to their more strict beauty st…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:20 AM
–

Posts like this is why I believe there should be an age restriction on black pill type content. You got a guy who's 18 years old and he's asking for advice how to fix his looks so he doesn't end up alone like the 30 year old men he sees online. My guy, even the top comments are calling the user out. He's 100% looking for attention and compliments. He knows he's attractive. He's acting exactly like most of the female submitters of /r/ roastme did. Like that one girl that was fishing for complimen…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:26 AM
–

Checking the user out, she seems to be a lesbian. Not sure why she's in the 4b subreddit, but she's 100% into women. Also has lifelong medical issues, and apparently multiple events that has caused her PTSD.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:21 AM
–

Time to abandon this phone lol ? You have a burner for reddit? What.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:18 AM
1

So, if somebody repeatedly keeps strawmaning somebody, or completely railroading the conversation, ignoring the core concepts of the comment they are replying to, in order to elicit a negative response from that user due to the deliberate strawmaning being done at them, would that be a troll? Again, I'm asking for examples for clarification. It seems to me that rule 3 is being ignored a lot, and mods only seem to intervene when the rage-baited users reply with personal attacks. I'll ask in the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 03:58 AM
1

I was waiting for a mod to comment, cuz I have a question. What constitutes a troll, or troll behavior for you guys? What breaks rule number 3 of the core rules?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 03:52 AM
1

You forget when he inserts his fake strawman quote and tells people to debate it. The dude unironically believes that putting quotes on any sentence makes the sentence valid and of substance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:56 AM
–

Lilith, the wookie and the lift guy are 100% trolls. It's just that for some reason, they don't get perma banned despite engaging in obvious trolling behavior. But if you mention it, you get strikes by the mods for witch hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:25 PM
3

Ultimately, there is nothing wrong with putting attractive traits first, men also does that. The problem is doing so while , in the same time: -claiming that you are looking for the opposite and shapping a narrative that basicaly say that personality is the main selector (the good old "if you're incel, then this might be something about your personality" fallacy) He clearly outlined the difference between both genders in his comment. If you bothered to read it instead of typing a generic respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:17 AM
3

I am almost almost sure that women who say they prefer "dadbods" or chubby guys are chubby/fat themselves and only have this preference to protect their own egos. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GvHMNn7XwAAa_Um?format=png&name=900x900
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:28 AM
3

We do that for ourselves. Classic. So why do you judge men as insecure for using shoe lifts? Sweetie, they aren't doing it for you or other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:26 AM
2

On the other hand, thats false advertisement and reeks of insecurity Like...make-up, push-up bras, shape wear do for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:25 AM
2

Except men don’t lie about this, that’s the difference. Men will openly say they’ll put up with a certain amount of downsides if a woman is hot enough or if the sex is good enough. Hence the "She can ruin me." meme that commonly gets commented on any post regarding a questionable but attractive woman, or any woman slightly related to the goth/alternative scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:21 AM
5

These are online echo chamber behaviors not widespread actual behaviors t fundamentally isn't true that most women think men who don't want to date fat women are bigoted BS. Nobody outside of the internet will ever openly state such, unless they werent in the vicinity of only close friends. Women don't think men should dehumanize and degrade fat women, which men seem keen to do to obese women for existing Look at the comments on an obese woman on instagram, the men are degrading her, if men left…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:00 AM
9

watching ramsay make some hamburgers with a girl I'm dating on a Saturday midday, bored out of my mind. "that burger reminds me of the burger a guy made me after I slept with him and his friends" had to act as if that didn't faze me at all excused myself to go buy some ingredients to the grocery store cuz I was hungry sat parked inside the parking lot of the grocery store for half an hour trying to comprehend why the fuck did she say that then, let alone do it in the first place True story.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:14 PM
2

If only lift and the wookie could read. They would be very upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:09 PM
5

I assume all women I date have had sexual partners before me. I don't care unless, they were cheating, helping cheat, or where still having sex with them while dating me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:06 PM
1

asks question recieves answer makes fun of it somehow thinks she and her group are not the toxic ones Hm.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:04 PM
6

And it's a given that eventually women will mention them anyways. I've had women I dated tell me about their old sexual partners completely unprompted.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:01 PM
0

Or just literally talk to her?? What are you talking about? My guy, the entire argument is that there is no magical way to tell when a girl is open to being approached without approaching them in the first place. So the idea that men should be able to "tell" when women are interested in being approached BEFORE bothering them is asinine. That's the entire point. It's obvious the guy should approach. The problem is that you have people even here, arguing that men need to be mind readers in order t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:04 AM
-3

In that situation, yeah. You kinda do. Both times she went to the club, one wanted to get hit on, one didn't. Unless you hover over her for a good while before approaching, you have no way to tell it she's receptive to getting hit on, and even then, you still end up like the creepy guy for hovering over her before approaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:58 PM
14

Except nice guys is also used to refer to guys that were friendly with women, get rejected and then just drift away/stop talking to the specific woman.| Which is the primary way people even here refer to nice guys lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:50 PM
9

Most women I know love when men sensually make out. Yeah, the same as men when they watch 2 women making out, but ask them if they would make out with a guy that sleeps with men and the phobias appear.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:09 AM
16

You've never gotten a bad feeling from someone that turned out to be right? Gotten a feeling that you shouldn't trust a person for a reason you can't put your finger on? TBF, most people can. Men can tell when another man is a sleazeball/fuckboi almost immediately as they appear in the vicinity, it's simply the case that even when these men make it as obvious as possible, as long as he is attractive, women won't care. So women can claim to have a toxic radar all they want, but a majority of time…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:54 AM
1

How am I delusional again?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:31 PM
13

No, incel is not a state of mind, that's an obfuscation of the term. You can state that some of the men that self-describe themselves as "incels" aren't really that because of their unattractiveness, but because of their mentality, but that's still not the same as stating that the term "incel" is a belief or state of mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:21 AM
3

Yeah... Like, This happened to me when I had my "glow up". I used to hang out with a group of women when I entered college, to better get to know women in general. I was fat and meek at the time, so I was a non-issue for them and they happily let me hang out. I remember how this particular woman, who was overweight, used to absolutely trash any man that was overweight, god forbid the ones that would approach her. She used to be VILE to these men. I thought that she was cute before I actually got…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:04 AM
2

Can you blame them? I've never experienced women hosting a general party or a sorority having a fun party, that was ALWAYS the domain of the men. In fact most women's housing was basically off limits to men so women were free to come and trash men's places So it's the fault of the women... so yeah, they can definitely blame themselves for it lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:47 AM
1

I think the point they are trying to make, is that if you saw your friend suffering or being hurt by it, why continue to keep the friendship? Why not simply cut off the friendship for their sake, even if they themselves wouldn't want to?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:36 AM
1

According to red pill males, average women are constantly getting dms and compliments from men on insta, getting free meals from men on a regular basis, getting approached by men irl on the daily etc. It's less specific than that tho. It's simply that the average woman is considered more "passable" or "attractive" to a large subset of men, than it is for the average man to be "passable" or "attractive" to a large subset of women. So obviously as you look at the averages, women tend to have more …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:31 AM
4

They like to pretend they are the experts and somehow anytime i ask something like what they can offer that would be attractive i get incoherent responses. So much for obsessing over women to not know what they like if asked bluntly. Be fit, confident yet not overbearing, have a good paying job, have hobbies outside of video-games or watching netflix all day, don't try to actively argue with women on concepts, specially dating woes, just nod and agree then dismiss the topic. There, that is enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:27 AM
2

Nobody is saying that you should care about men laughing at your delusional standards, or that you should change them to appease the men laughing at you... It's simply that it's funny to see how delusional some people are. There's nothing else to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:19 AM
7

Who said that reasonable_mouse789 was trying to get these women to date him?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:18 AM
14

Except you know... the women that go online and state exactly how delusional their standards are while complaining that no man is enough for them...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:16 AM
2

A predominantly female uni will simply just be much better for the late 20s early 30s dudes in that area NOT attending the uni. What's pretty funny about this is that according to studies made on the subject, women entering college are actually starting to AVOID female-majority colleges. So take that grain of salt how you will...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:15 AM
20

Hm, no. Attractive men can be picky if they so wished, but most of them are not. If attractive men were as picky as the average women, they wouldn't be sleeping with average women in droves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:11 AM
21

I’m starting to realize that my non-incel boyfriend sometimes slips into red-pill-ish mindset. Can women stop using the incel term incorrectly? Incel means involuntarily celibate. Of course a guy that has a fucking girlfriend is not an incel. "I'm starting to realize my boyfriend sometimes slips into a red-pill-ish mindset." There. Fixed it for you. I guess I'm surprised he hasn't reconsidered those ideas, given our long-term relationship, the fact that we love each other, and that I stayed with…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 11:37 PM
–

Don't remember if windmill is a mod or is an alt of a mod. But that could have been the reason. Many well known troll-adjecent accounts get to spam/roam free in this sub, despite the obvious troll tactics, but if you reference them by name for being trolls, you get banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 10:41 PM
–

You think it’s the opposite yet insist this quote you can’t disprove is mine because you can’t search YouTube comments? Whether or not you created the quote is not the problem nor the concern. Is how you REPEATEDLY lied about the origin of the quote. Now it's the youtube comments. 3 months ago, it was your hookup feminist buddy who said the quote. Before that, it was just another poster on PPD. What's the next origin story gonna be? Buddy making up more origins for a quote than the entire comic-…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:16 PM
–

No, if anything it's the opposite I think it's opposite of that. You come across as much dumber and insecure than you try to not be. And I don't need to keep telling people anything. The record is there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:08 PM
–

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1m2cj40/comment/n3omzed/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:04 PM
–

If there's one person here who has been confirmed to have been lying about shit like that has been you, my dude. Something something glass houses...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 01:56 PM
–

But that’s making whole ass relationship be about nothing but looks and leagues, that’s not how relationships work. My girl. The original tiktok only evaluated those relationships by ONE metric and ONE metric ONLY. How looksmatched they are. Obviously then, the people that criticize such a post would criticize it based on its merits. In this case, the original post's notions that the men and women there are equally looksmatched. How the F did you miss the obvious? “these people aren’t in the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:43 PM
3

would treat these girls any better lol why are they mad? because they can't abuse and settle for these women? The post you linked is critiquing the assertion the original tiktok post made, tho. Has nothing to do with how they personally would treat the women. If somebody told me. "Hey, these two people are equally attractive." and showed me the first two pictures that post linked. I'd genuinely laugh. The men are 100% better looking than the women they are dating (in the first 2 pictures) and he…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:21 PM
3

https://i.imgur.com/A1GIavN.png
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:11 PM
2

You have a very warped sense of reality if you truly believe that most men do those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:04 PM
1

even tho gen z can have cas sex there is still some stigma around it. "for the street" and body count discussions are a thing with some gen z men, regarding women. Most people like eating pizza. Most people wouldn't date a person who gorges themselves on pizza every day of the week.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 11:48 AM
–

“Evoking raw sexual attraction” is not the same thing as “being open to the idea of getting sexually closer to you, however small that might be.” Yes, those were your words. When somebody evokes raw sexual attraction, AKA they are physically attractive, it means that almost every single person that looks at them, THINK about the idea of potentially sleeping with them. Whether that means getting your genitals instantly hard or wet is up for discussion. But emanating raw sexual attraction means ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 06:55 AM
–

the primary trigger for female sexual attraction is also false. By the literal definition, being physically attractive means that you evoke raw sexual attraction towards the opposite gender. Meaning if a person finds you physically attractive, then it is because either they are open to the idea of getting sexually closer to you, however small that may be, or THINK other people would. If you don't feel like somebody as physically attractive, it means that the thought of sex with that person has n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 06:30 AM
1

Because it's a bad faith deflection. Nobody is arguing for "historical guilt." Historical guilt, in this context is literally a man getting accused online by a random person, and then using that unsubsidized claim to place guilt upon them every time their name comes up. There's not a single informal fallacy, it's a category of fallacies, and you have failed to identify which one I'm supposedly committing by asking you to back up your claim. It's called an argument from ignorance. That is true of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:06 AM
3

I never said a word about "historical guilt." ... That's what the person you replied to said... which you deliberately ignored or never actually read... which makes sense as to why you thought I was only referring to you when it mentioned both terms to set the context of the entire debate... Again, this is just people having opinions. People's opinions are not bound to court rulings. The whole point of this post is how public accusations without merit and without following legal proceedings can …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:00 AM
2

I ended my comment with this statement for a reason: There are outside factors that haven't been properly researched/studied that could impact how men settle for less time with their children. You must have not read it. Because I'm not hand waving the original answer away, simply said that there could be more things that a simple "they don't want to". whcih IME is a rather big one. The entire point of my comment, is that men's reasons for wanting less time with their children in divorces, haven'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:56 AM
2

BUT you are also ignoring a big "outside factor" here - they simply don't want it. I'm not ignoring an "outside factor" if the subject in question IS the MAIN answer used to explain the subject at hand my guy. I simply provided POSSIBLE other factors that could explain the discrepancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:28 AM
5

What legal standard do you imagine has changed? Nice underhanded tactic btw. Slipping that specific tidbit to change the entire context. I think most people here are implicitly referring to the cases where a man gets falsely accused, and gets his name/identity dragged through the mud in the process of clearing his name, which will likely never truly be cleared, since that stain will remain on his social status, whether local or familial or even professional. So in the context of "the second the …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:46 AM
0

I'd think it's 50/50, aka it happens to both and largely depends on the social culture of where the individuals live.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:42 AM
1

After all what happens when you say "All lives matter" to a BLM activist. The difference between the two is quite clear. I'm not sure how you managed to get it wrong. Black Lives Matter is a term which SPECIFICALLY refers to a single race, that being the african-american, hence the word: "Black" (In the context of the racial issues in the U.S.). Believe Women is a term which refers to a GENERALIZATION everywhere. The context of the term is literally the entire planet. There is no specific contex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:40 AM
9

By your admission, the only thing she is being charged with is trying to provide proof of what she presumed was sexual assault No, she is being charged with DISTRIBUTING that video online. Again, I literally told you that 20 days ago. But you are still incapable of comprehending basic logic. She posted the video online on tiktok. That is her crime. If she had just went to the police with the video, and WAITED to see what they investigated, alongside DoorDash, this wouldn't have happened. But ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:19 AM
13

A DoorDash delivery driver in New York has been charged with two felonies for whipping out her cellphone and filming a TikTok of a half-naked customer who was "incapacitated and unconscious on his couch due to alcohol consumption," according to police... Authorities allege that the video, "along with the subsequent investigation," indicated that the man was "incapacitated and unconscious on his couch due to alcohol consumption" and Henderson captured the footage "from the exterior" of the victim…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 01:56 AM
1

Is that a Viktor reference?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 01:50 AM
3

A couple of ways the trend happens imo: Legal divorce proceedings take months to deal with, and sure, everybody roughly knows what happens after the divorce, but what about during? Usually, the woman stays in the same house with the kids, and the man moves out to a smaller apartment. This restricts the available space to keep children sometimes. Even at 50/50. Lawyers do put the argument that even moving to an apartment or commuting could uproot the children's lives, and negatively affect them. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:32 PM
3

Demand is just a more strongly worded Expectation, at least that's the way I'm using the terms here. Like no youre sorry about what? Just an expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 04:26 PM
2

They didn't, though. Nobody in this thread demanded it. distinction without a difference. See below: Men always want rewards and pats on the head for being a basically decent human being. . Uh yeah dude, the fact that you're outraged that terrified women didn't shower someone with praise and not the fact that they were terrorized in the first place is the whole point. Yeah. You are incredibly dumb. Showering somebody with praise is not the same as saying a simple thank you. Why yes, they must ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 11:29 AM
3

They EXPECTED men to put their lives on the line. That's why they were so hellbent on stating that men having the audacity to expect even a simple "Thank You" from saving and protecting women, is something that is wrong, and shouldn't even be done. That what the man did should be expected and should not be rewarded. women ran away from a man who tried to assault them rather than fawning over the man who protected them, though. You must be dumb, because never did I state they ran away from the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 11:17 AM
5

A) the extent to which guys here believe that feminists and progressives expect men to put their lives on the line for strangers is so exaggerated that it's almost comical. If the responses made by women to this comment I made on the same situation is any indication, they absolutely do think it's highly expected for men to put their lives on the line for them lmfao: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/Qh3sov4m3z
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 05:16 AM
4

Are you really this disingenuous? The minotaur is not described as a grotesque amalgamation. It is described as extremely handsome in the book. Geniunely seek a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:13 PM
9

One of the top selling romance novels right now is Morning Glory Milking Farm. Do you think those minotaurs are physically attractive to women? Ah yes, the mythical 10 feet hunk half man with fur on his skin, luscious muscles, wavy long hair, throbbing humongous Cock that the main character has to milk out to collect his semen all the while having a deep voice that literally makes the MC wet at times, which she rewiterates constantly how he's so far above her league. How commanding and stern the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:06 PM
19

We were conditioned to believe that if a manreally desires us, he will pine for us. Yearn for us. Go through great lengths to demonstrate his undying devotion and obsession over us. See Disney, Hallmark movies, romance novels, etc It's funny how this is all in the context of: "and he's attractive." Nobody is mentioning shit or referring to what you said to unattractive dudes that obsess over a woman. Apply the same standards that you have for unattractive men to abusive men, and you will have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 08:14 AM
14

Yeah, studies and trends show that if given a choice, the majority of women either date on the same financial bracket or up. So you don't need to be Einstein to determine that even if women out earned a majority of men, they would still employ the Apex fallacy and continue to look up, disregarding the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:40 PM
–

This is mostly a revenge fantasy. Believing this is why y'all struggle. You can't ignore all the different psychological studies and peer reviews on the topic that state the contrary... It's not a revenge fantasy, it's simply reality. The Chad hyperbole caricature that gets away with everything might not be real it is a real phenomenon that attractive people tend to get away with more bad behavior than unattractive do. Dating is not different. To deny it is to simply not live in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:33 PM
–

I'm personally not a very angry person, but lots of guys have anger issues. There's no mechanism by which I can "take responsibility" of the wider problem of male anger issues. The difference between the genders is that society look at those negative scenarios and places the responsibility on all the men. Society keeps men accountable, which is why "teach men not to rape" was so popular at one point. The point is that those negative conducts are used to then paint all men as that, insinuating th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:30 PM
–

Why are these lonely men incapable of doing what women did? This goes against the statement that the original comment made btw. If both genders feel JUST AS LONELY yet women TEND to have MORE FRIENDS, what makes you think the solution for the male loneliness epidemic is widening their social circle? The whole point is that the wider social circle that women generally have doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:25 PM
–

when study after study shows both sexes are equally lonely says otherwise Male loneliness epidemic entails more than studies that evaluate how disconnected people feel. It entails things like mental health, suicide, violent outbursts, hate rhetoric etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:22 PM
2

Railroading the topic again. Can't say I didn't see it coming. Never did I argue the CAUSE of why men don't have many social safety nets. I simply STATED that your assessment that men are allowed to succeed more in life is directly contradicted by the LACK of safety nets for them when a person is theoritically in the worst place to be at, and would need the help to succeed. So guys are capable of voting for Trump to piss off feminists but you’ll get squeamish because some man haters yell at you?…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:20 PM
–

Matches on Tinder doesn’t mean options. Options doesn’t mean good options. It is fairly logical to understand that the more options you have for something, the easier it is to segregate or discard those that you do not like. If women are faced with a "lack" of good options (which imo its bs) despite the numerous options available to them, what makes you think it's any easier for the men that struggle to get any options at all? The men still have to apply the same standards to evaluate their opti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:13 PM
–

True forgot about that word.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:57 AM
–

The post: Help me understand the "not girlfriend material" phenomenon You: She isn’t ignored in general like unwanted males. Your comparison is incorrect Most men that use the "not girlfriend material" to refer to a woman that has been with a lot of guys, would ignore such a woman for a committed relationship... how illogical do you have to be to not understand the context of the entire post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:09 PM
–

In this hypothethical scenario of a man curving a woman because of the high amount of sexual partners, then yes, that woman is ignored. That's kind of the whole point of the example.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 09:23 PM
4

The same reason men don't file for divorce; they're averse to detailing failures, challenges Which is indicative of... a societal structure that tells men that they cannot fail, and if they do, they are done and nobody will help them otherwise they are not real men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 09:22 PM
2

Historically (in part as a result of a 1977 guideline), women of childbearing potential were excluded from early clinical trials in an attempt to protect any potential fetus from unanticipated exposure to potentially harmful drugs, particularly in early drug development. Excluding women of childbearing potential rather than informing them of the need to avoid pregnancy while participating in the trial implied to many a lack of respect for autonomy and responsibility and carried the potential of …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 09:17 PM
3

That's....my point. Why are you repeating me so much. They're less likely to take chances that negatively affect them. Which is why they fail less What are you actually refuting about my initial statement? Because I argued that the problem, is that men DO fail more, because they take more risks, YET societal safety nets help women more than men proportionality speaking. Therefore, no, men are not given more chances to succeed but rather the opposite, women do. Partly because they are less risk a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:01 PM
–

Which is funny because that's often the same reason BP argue about men that are dateless. Something MUST be wrong with them. Otherwise they would get somebody. But if a woman is ignored because of the amount of sexual partners she had, that's the fault of the men, not her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:56 PM
–

It would be the ultimate compliment if the effort her past partners gave to her was the same that you are giving to her now for the same treatment. But most of the times it isn't. The guy she settles with offends up doing more for less. Also it's a big IF. There is a difference between choosing out of necessity and out of want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:53 PM
8

So why are you complaining about the lack of safety nets for guys? . First of all. I'm not complaining. I simply stated that your argument thar men are given more chances to succeed is directly contradicted by the amount of social safety nets awarded to them. If they were given more chances to succeed, they would partake more in societal nfatety nets because those directly give them more chances to succeed. Your group clearly don’t believe in safety nets Don't believe in PARTAKING in safety nets…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:37 PM
4

Uh? My point is that men get less aid exactly because they partake in it less. My point exactly is that the safety nets aren't skewed towards women because society gives men less chances but because men actively refuse to take chances. Ah yes. We all know that women take more financial chances that end them up in bankruptcy and homelessness than men do. Backward logic. Women are less prone to take chances that could affect them negatively. we have mountains of studies proving that the case, wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:31 PM
3

Depends on how you mean this. Women using more social safety nets is exactly that. Men tend not to pursue them just as much. That's not reflective of those safety nets refusing to include men or not give them chances. It does when objectively speaking, more men are failing or have failed, but receive half as many resources as women do by proportionality. Most homeless shelters are 50/50, for instance, despite more than 2/3rds of the homeless population being composed by men. So, by nature of mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:26 PM
6

Manosphere coupled up with conservatives, first of all. Wouldn't it be the opposite? Assuming most conservative men despise welfare, wouldn't that mean that since they don't partake in welfare, then they believe nobody else should either? That doesn't disprove anything that I said. If you’re all for safety, nets, why are you part of a group that despises the safety nets for children? See above. Nothing in your comment even remotely was related to what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:19 PM
10

As in? Like I said, it would be reflected in the lowest parts of society, but the inverse happens. Men are not given more chances women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:37 PM
3

Certain things are done in society to protect the most vulnerable. Shelters exist because it is extremely dangerous for a woman and child to be unhoused. 75% of homeless deaths every year are men. Welfare benefits are available to men. They just need to apply. That's not how it works. And you clearly speak from a privileged place. Welfare is selective in part because of the limited resources available. And like you previously said, women are given priority over men. Not only that but let's assum…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:36 PM
13

Dude, I wasn’t just talking about dating. If men truly were given way more chances overall in life to succeed and get help, it would be reflected in a society's safety nets. Things like homeless shelters, the amount of welfare benefits, things like affordable housing, shelters, or like schollarships that are only gender-based, affirmative action, etc. Yet by every metric, women use way more social safety nets than men do. If we specify only dating, that still doesn't work. Like women routinely c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:50 PM
4

Your only error is that you brought up math and hard verifiable data into the discussion. Women here won't engage In that and will just downvote quietly because it doesn't paint them as the gender that is struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 10:55 PM
–

Reminder, last time she dated was in 2008. Same year Facebook became popular. Also she is married to a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:24 PM
–

... you're either twelve or never interacted with women before Can't say much cuz it could be perceived as a witch hunt, but that account is most likely a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:22 PM
1

And what do you think causes those bad social skills? There’s a lot of cruelty from women if you don’t look, dress and act a certain way while being a man with status. Where in this reply was the commenter excusing or justifying it? He simply said a possible cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 11:32 PM
2

My guy, you are fighting an imaginary battle. Never did I state my opinion on the matter. I simply said that they used a fallacy to push their point to a claim nobody made. If you look at the original comment they responded to. That comment simply stated a possible CAUSE to the problem these men currently have. Not an excuse that these men will continue to use as a crutch. Nobody has stated: "Well, women bullied these men, so therefore the men don't have to learn social skills now." Yet that's w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 10:13 PM
–

We can change and adapt with the times. Which starts with acknowledging things like that the safety equipment doesn't work as well for women and that that is part of why they don't want to do the job. The problem that you have is that you erroneously believe that almost every "hard" job that is primarily composed of male workers, are so because of their equipment. As if the equipment themselves are made with the intention to exclude women. As a basic example, women in the military train with far…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 10:07 PM
1

If you say that because of X I can't do Y others do get to say that they were in that same position, made different choices and got different outcomes. Except the person that she was refuting such did not state that. They simply said that the reason why some men lack social skills could be because of the cruelty they experience from women. They didn't say that the men can't learn or will never learn. They simply stated that a possible cause of a lack of social skills among those men, could have …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:55 PM
–

As someone who has known unhinged women all her life, their man hating and wokeness comes from serious trauma. With the unhinged guys, mainly LGBT ones who deal with crazy family. With unhinged straight men, however, I noticed it’s mainly been mundane stuff driving them to the arms of anti-feminists. Had to laugh at the obvious bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:51 PM
1

Someone posted an excuse for why they can't learn social skills. Another person refuted that claim. By stating their own life experience. Which was immediately refuted by... that other person's life exp. it isn't the bullying. It is the reaction to it that sets the path you are on. And she could have argued that without injecting her own life exp. Once she did so, she made it a competition because the only way to refute somebody else's life exp is to use your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:42 PM
9

The biggest difference between the two, is that current discourse promotes women to do whatever they want because each of them is perfect in their own way, so even if they seem to be failing, they are generally coddled by society at large. Men don't have that resource.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:28 PM
11

Getting married is my only goal in life but I’ve never learned how to be wife material, due to my mum being a feminist who taught me that my value isn’t in being someone’s wife. I worry that if I don’t learn how to be or not be wife material by 30 (8 years away), no one else will want me except my boyfriend but even then, we might not get married. She's right btw. Your value shouldn't be tied to another. You should put value in yourself, before seeking a relationship, let alone marry a partner f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:14 PM
–

The claim was that bullying keeps you from learning social skills. And it became a competition when you decided to use your life exp. Because the validity of your life exp is just as valid as the other person's life exp that disagrees with your opinion. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:04 PM
–

I have seen one shorter and fat guy in a relationship with a taller woman. Most of the fat guys in relationships tend to be far far taller than the woman they are dating or married to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:02 PM
–

Oh so you want it to be a competition? lol Girl... you made it a competition when you decided to use your very specific life experience in order to erroneously state a generalization...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:01 PM
–

but doesn't mean low self esteem doesn't correlate with attractiveness. Low self-esteem does not NECESSARILY correlate with attractiveness, otherwise the majority of attractive people would have mental health problems and would constitute a larger portion of things like suicide etc. Stating that a single mental disorder is typically shown in attractive people, does not mean that the majority of attractive people suffer from such disorder. I think the difference between me and you is you might be…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:56 PM
–

thinking about it I think you're wrong, the hottest people I know have the lowest self esteem, this is why they're hot, their low self esteem compels them to become as hot as possible You are wrong then, because it is the opposite. Attractive people tend to be more outgoing, confident, have a more positive outlook on life, tend to get hired and promoted easier and faster, and tend to have a wider social net. As far as studies go, narcissism (a mental disorder due to very low self esteem) actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:50 PM
–

Mothers are increasingly becoming primary earners, with data showing significant increases in this role Uh, no. Women, not mothers, btw, are still a huge minority, when it comes to PRIMARY earnings in a household. The egalitarian household is shortening the gap, meaning there is a increase of households where both genders contribute roughly the same, but women being PRIMARY caregivers has largely remained the same: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:34 PM
–

Those dangerous jobs are also designed for men, the equipment, the safety gear, all of it is still designed to work with a male body They are "desgined" for men, because men do those jobs... you got the cause and effect backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:28 PM
1

Search up his name on this sub. Only a single post was made using his name. And the majority of the commenters was against the opinion of the poster...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 09:14 AM
1

You are lying like straight up, the concensus online and in here at the time was that he was a piece of shit and deserved way more jail time than he got. Lying about stuff so easily verifiable is asinine.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:27 AM
0

Fuck off. Like no he wasn't. Reddit was behemetdly against him since the start. Nobody was defending him, even here. What are you smoking? I just searched PPD for his name and a single post came up, and it was heavily downvoted and clowned for. In fact, how the f would you know what was said on PPD when your account was created in 2022?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:15 AM
2

Ah yes. Brock Turner, the man that was caught raping an unconscious woman, got beat up, then got his name dragged through the mud rightfully so that he tried to go either his middle name after his daddy bailed him out? That Brock Turner? Infamously hated online and IRL? You have to be mental if you believe that men were defending him en masse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:11 AM
1

The education system was designed by men for boys. Because in the beginning girls were not always allowed to attend school, or attended only until about 6th grade. The education system was wildly different in the 1900s and even before that compared to the rigid and extremely passive learning system we have today. Part of that was because of girl's inclusions in the classroom. The major outlet that boys have to manifest their emotions and what they feel is through active play, yet those kinds of …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 06:21 AM
6

So gay men being thrown off rooftops for loving another man by other men isnt a male issue? A gay man being thrown off of a rooftop for loving another gay man isn't a male issue, it's a gay issue. Do you think that women don't experience homophobia and don't get treated equally or worse in certain countries? Wow. How insensitive you must be. tHERe’s noThInG MorE i can ReAllY SAY I’m JusT sHOcKED. There’s nothing more I can really say I’m just shocked. No, you aren't. You are just a troll that po…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:23 AM
7

Putting your life on the line for somebody else is not being a decent human being. The reason why those kinds of situations are seen as brave is because that is going far beyond what a normal person would. Men always want rewards and pats on the head for being a basically decent human being The empathetic gender in full display here btw
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:13 AM
5

Homophobia is an issue for people of the LGBTQ+ community, which men can belong to so. But it's not a male specific issue. How ignorant do you have to be to not understand what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:38 PM
1

So not caring who the main victims of those typesnof hate crimes are? This is the fucking problem. That male specific problems cannot be discussed at all. It HAS to be related to a more "oppressed" community in order to be allowed to be discussed. Thank you, you literally proved the point. Pointing how Homophobia is not a male-specific issue is not me neither not caring about it, or men not thinking it's a problem. It's simply, not a male specific issue. Women keep advising man that there is a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:33 PM
5

The issue is with men who dont know how to behave and demanding empathy while he has none for others. if you think men can’t express their sexuality without being pieces of shit, that says a lot about how you view men. I'm gonna be honest. The kind of men that behave that way, tend to be either burned out incels online, or sociopaths/abusive men that always seem to have a partner justifying and excusing their behavior. Crying “Men arent allowed to have preferences, but women are!” but then this …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:06 PM
4

My girl. WE DO! What do you think happens to a man that gets caught by other men raping another woman out in public? If they don't immediately flatline him on the spot it would be a miracle. The actuality is that men do call out bad behavior. We do point it out. But usually the kind of men that do this shit out in public, tend to either have status or are attractive, so they get a lot of defenders, mostly women. The amount of times that I have personally seen a woman being interested in a guy, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:50 PM
7

Because they dont know how to genuinely be good people. They pretended to be nice for pussy and got mad that their fakeness didn't yield results. I disagree. As in, yeah maybe some men and boy teens, fake being nice when they are actually assholes in the hopes of getting pussy, but I think that the majority of times this is not the case. I do think that generally speaking both men and women tend to be nice and cordial with one another. The thing is, that when teen and young adult men have a crus…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:42 PM
1

I barely even open Instagram, and I only compare myself to older pictures of myself, because I was overweight in the past and I keep myself in shape. So no.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:32 AM
1

True, all those current zoomers that can't even get a job in this economy, are increasingly less social, that hvae higher rates of mental issues than older generations, and are constantly being bombarded with vanity advertisements that highlight how horrible their life is compared to the people in those ads or social media posts, can't imagine anything worse than a dry dick. Why yes, all of the times I specifically used the pronouns "I" "Me" "We". You genuinely need to learn how to read and comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:28 AM
2

Again, I know it's mentally taxing to formulate concepts, but just because I claimed that a generation or a group of people typically suffer more from something, does not necessarily mean that an individual inside that generation or group is suffering from those same things. I didn't admit to anything. But it's okay, Boomer.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:01 AM
2

How am I supposed to know how much sex you have? Or that you are embittered about it? How is it that usually in this sub, women that are typically older, college educated, and supposedly successful in the work and profesional sector, tend to always have subpar reading comprehension? I never claimed that I was insulted by it, or embittered by it. I simply said that gloating that you are going to have sex "while the men debate" in a sub primarily about debating is laughably childish my girl. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 12:58 AM
2

It's fine, people your age tend to have problems with your mental capacities, so it's understandable that your current reading comprehension skills are subpar. Like I said. It's okay, Boomer.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:44 PM
1

True, all those current zoomers that can't even get a job in this economy, are increasingly less social, having higher rates of mental issues than older generations, and are constantly being bombarded with vanity advertisements that highlight how horrible their life is compared to the people in those ads or social media posts, can't imagine anything worse than a dry dick. It's okay, Boomer.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:37 PM
2

Because the concept of somebody standing up and saying: "Hey everybody I'm going to have sex while you all don't haha!" is pretty childish. Sex positive people that are mature adults, know the difference between being open to the discussion of sexual topics, and boasting about the concept simply having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:33 PM
2

And as I pointed out, you're talking out of your ass if you think the issue millennials have with boomers is their mentality. I never specifically stated specifically,the problems Millenials have with Boomers, I simply mentioned how a Boomer's perspective of the current economical problems are not really valid, because most of them don't even perceive the problems. Just like your perspective on the current dating market is not really valid, because the last time you ever engaged in it was almost…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:22 PM
3

After all, the number of men applying to college had already begun to fall below the number of women — a trend that would soon accelerate, worsening a growing nationwide decline in enrollment. But admissions officers still wanted to balance out the number of men and women on campus. “Toward the end of filling out the class, there would definitely be a push to look for more men to admit,” said Medley, who was in her role at Brandeis from 2012 to 2014. “The standards were certainly lower for male …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:18 PM
3

Okay...? Have fun I guess. Mrs. Sex-Haver? How childish do you have to be to type that sentence out and then think it's some sort of clapback. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:15 PM
3

I compared how Boomers that haven't seen or engaged in the current housing market, and the last time they did so was over 20 or 30 years ago, have the same ignorance of the current problems of the housing market, as somebody that hasn't been single or hasn't engaged in the dating market in almost 20 years, right before the era of Social Media rose. But I understand the concept is hard for people of your age and mentality, so we can leave it as that. It's okay, Boomer.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:11 PM
3

It's all fine. I thought you didn't wish to talk anymore. It's okay, Boomer.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:02 PM
3

Not a virgin. But it's okay, Boomer. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:59 PM
3

Okay, Boomer.👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:58 PM
3

Right... Okay Boomer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:57 PM
3

Okay Boomer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:54 PM
4

So you believe in affirmative action and gender parity then? Good. I have no objection to gender parity as needed. Gender parity? Yes. Affirmative Action? Right now? No. Affirmative Action should be a temporary thing, not a common place movement. By the way, I NEVER said women should be “heavily favored” in colleges. How dishonest can you be? No, you just claimed that men still are heavily favored in certain colleges, when that's not really the case anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:54 PM
5

The fact that you can't even understand the simple concept of what I said, proves that you are in fact just like them. I said that Baby Boomers tend to look at wages and the economy in a simple way. They see that the average salary wage HAS INCREASED NUMERICALLY, and think: "Well if now wage has bigger dollar number than past, then wage right now bigger than past wage. Therefore, young people lazy whiners." Because they don't understand that just because the amount of something increases across …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:51 PM
3

I was born in 1997, and I still engage in the dating scene if that's what you are asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:32 PM
3

No, I compared the mentality of the Baby Boomers when it comes to wages/money, to your mentality when it comes to the dating market. You believe that most men here that complain are just lazy/unmotivated/weak and pathethic simply because you believe that if men managed to have an easy dating life in the 2000s, then it must still be same, it's just that these current men are simply unmotivated whiners.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:31 PM
7

That's fine, I just think that you don't come here to truly lay an insight into the problems in the dating market, you just come here to insult the people that in your eyes, dare criticize the current problems of it or "whine" about it. After all you got yours. You don't care about those that haven't gotten theirs, even if it's harder now. What you are currently doing is the equivalent of kicking the ladder down, after climbing it rather easily, and then mocking the people that have to climb the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:23 PM
10

CURRENT VIRGIN MEN POST HERE because they ARE STILL PRESENTLY trying to engage in the CURRENT DATING MARKET, EVEN IF THEY CONTINUE TO REPEATEDLY FAIL. So yes, the current virgin man that keeps continuously failing in the current age, has more merits when it comes to the discussion of the current dating market, than somebody that the last time they had engaged in any sort of tangible way in the dating market, was almost 20 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:05 PM
8

The point that I tried to make, is that you lay judgement and comment here on the current dating dynamics, when the last time you ever actually dated was before the social media age began. Like, the fundamental statement regarding the dating dynamics in this sub, is that it is almost completely agreed that the dating problems of the 2000s has been exacerbated by the Social Media age. Yet you come here and type as if you have any sort of exp with it. If I saw a discussion about the current phones…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:00 PM
4

Yet, many women can no longer have abortions in the many states in the USA even when their life is at risk. The concept of abortions, at least in the legal sense in the U.S. is not that women shouldn't have abortions. What the U.S. Supreme court determined, is that the concept of the legality of abortions should be handled in a State by State basis, and not be forced by the Federal Supreme Court. Many universities continue to favor male applicants in 2025 in the USA. We are actualky still arguin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:54 PM
8

You do know that when most people talk about Feminism, they do mean the West right? Nobody is arguing that women that primarily are born in the middle east have feminism. Lmao. But it would be incredibly stupid to justify male privilege in the west, by pointing out that feminism doesn't exist in the east. If anything it would be the opposite. The morals of the western world gives the privilege to those that are perceived to be weaker or less fortunate, to have a voice and be heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:52 PM
0

Isn't that the point of TRP. To teach men that don't know how the rules or how to win the game to go on to win it eventually? You are just reiterating that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:44 PM
9

Everybody knows that having friends is an equal substitute to having a romantic partner, right? I mean, why do the majority of people want to have a romantic/sexual partner, when they can simply have friends. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:41 PM
5

She’s not “incapable of entertaining herself”, so much as if you are on a date with her, she’s SUPPOSED to be paying attention to YOU. You completely miss the point. The point men make when it comes to the idea that it's the man's job to keep their new date entertained and stimulated is not that the woman aren't paying attention to the men, but rather that when it comes to dating, women are entirely passive EVEN WHEN they go on a date with a guy. Most people even men understand how awkward it mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:31 PM
10

So you were single up until the same year Facebook overtook Myspace for the largest social media platform and practically started the social media age. No wonder you have your beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:24 PM
–

I have always stated that the reason why RP is so hated by BPers, is three-fold. Because it goes against the narrative of the Just World/Karmic fallacy. AKA If you are a good person, good things will happen to you. If you are bad person, bad things happen. Ugly men are Ugly because they are bad people. Because it gives the necessary perspective and tools to low-valued men to either ascend, or "disguise" themselves as high-value. Most BPers and women specifically, have an inherent "Pull yourself …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:09 PM
11

Did I claim different?.Why the aggresion?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 05:58 PM
13

Stats say that women tend to be in relationships far more than men do in the same age range tho. So I'm not sure what you mean by this. Unless women are dating much older men, which I doubt, The logical other option is that women classify FWBs and Situationships as relationships and men don't. Hence why this guy classified his friends that are women as single, because to him, they aren't in a comitted relationship, but if you were to ask them, they would mention thar they have a FWB.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:13 PM
23

The issue is not that women have voluntary celibacy but why. Having voluntary celibacy until the point they want to just have sex at a moments notice (more or less) is completely different from putting on a clown face in the hopes one woman finds you worthwhile for it. Like people above have said. Women never stress about sex because the moment they want it, they will have it. Men don't have that option unless they are Greek Adonis to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:10 PM
7

What makes someone sexually compatible or not with you? Does it rely on physical characteristics or simply a willingness to do? I'd assume she's referring to the detail you left out when quoting her. She says she's kinky, so he should be into that stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:32 PM
7

It's not, that was pretty much agreed back when RP sub wasn't banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:39 PM
41

Yeah, the average age gap between couples is around ~3 years, meaning women tend to pick men that are slightly older (established) than them, but not living in a completely different world as them. Think, freshman to senior, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:28 PM
–

I find it interesting that on any given celebrity thread there's always some Redditor in the comments who grew up with them or something. You should read up on the term "6 Degrees of Separation." Basically, to connect two people who are seemingly unrelated to each other in the entire globe, it only takes 6 steps. This means that mathematically speaking, you and I could be connected right now, and it would only take us 6 or fewer people between us to connect. Maybe my mother knows your best frien…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:58 AM
15

Ngl, this is hilarious. "Just approach women if you want a girlfriend." "Hmmm, this guy looks like he is extroverted and more likely to cheat because he had the audacity to approach me without knowing me beforehand." The game is rigged. Men cannot win.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:51 AM
7

Usually, Hallmark movies have the woman quit her high stress job and take a different, less stressful job, or even become a housewife to the new guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 07:29 PM
25

Hallmark channel movies are usually about a tired single or divorced woman, who moves back to her home town or somewhere in the Midwest, meets a tall strong man with a flannel shirt that seems nice, does a physical labor job, and handles every repair in her home and then has to contend with him or a rich handsome guy she stumbled into before meeting the flannel guy. They still employ patriarchal tones lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:05 PM
1

https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/san-francisco/profile/food-delivery/doordash-1116-545841/complaints?page=680 In 3 years, customers have went out of their way to report 18,168 to the BBB. That very likely means that even more reports are submitted internally every 3 years. If we only take the BBB statistic into account, that means every day there's AT LEAST 20 complaints done by ONLY customers every day. I know you don't particularly care about statistics or numbers and you are just asking this to be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:27 PM
2

They only moved QUICKLY because it went viral my girl. You don't know how many more serious reports were disregarded just to make her specific report a priority. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:17 PM
2

Sure did experiencing that not affect you mentally? Of course it did. But just because it affected me mentally, does it give ME a reason to then disparage any person that is being accused of something just because they were accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:09 PM
7

But young women of late are the most vocal about any kinds of justice/morality topics, or all about inclusion of diverse preferences, appearances and behaviors. They are much more educated and intelligent compared to former generations. That has nothing to do with them as a collective not being shallow. You can easily fight against racism and still have an inherent bias to favor attractive people of color over ugly people of color. There's a reason why Lookism or Pretty Privilege is not rooted i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:08 PM
2

Have you ever been raped? Sexually assaulted? Had someone masturbate in front of you in public? Groped? I’m going to assume no tbh because you can’t fathom a headspace someone could be in after that. Maybe she had a strong reaction because of past trauma. No.Yes.No.Yes. Anything else you want to ask that I have experienced? And the assumption is because this incident follows a well understood pattern of behavior. Even if it was a pattern of behavior, she didn't need to post the actual evidence o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:04 PM
59

One thing I appreciate about the younger generation of women is that they are indeed less shallow attraction-wise. I have no doubt about it. Huh? Younger people are more RUTHLESS when it comes to physical attraction. Therefore they are EVEN MORE SHALLOW than older generations. There's a reason why young Gen-Zers are now a significant portion of the gym memberships. Because they all care about being hot and attractive. Because they are more shallower than the older generations, even the older Gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:47 PM
2

If it's just one complaining Dasher, then shove it aside and not care, while the man flashes his next driver. And the next few until it finally gets heard, if ever. You do understand, that it is possible that dozens if not hundreds of the same report or even worse ones are submitted every day by employees of this company right? If so, they would need to properly investigate every single one, and take the evidence very seriously to lay judgment on the report. You have to give them TIME to go thro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:44 PM
2

She probably shouldn’t have posted a video and exposed others. But to assume that means she wants clout is wild. Especially as a woman who has had to deal with the system that’s allegedly there to protect us. My girl. She took less than a day after submitting her report to DoorDash to publish the video online. You cannot be serious. She wasn't burned by society or DoorDash. DoorDash never even had the chance to "ignore" her report if they so chose. She literally forced their hand to fire her, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:39 PM
3

Are you purposely obtuse? I clearly meant that any non-viral report would take more than two days, even if they are serious. If not, then I'm making it apparent now.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:31 PM
1

When I heard that, I laughed. You don't need to tell me that somebody insanely attractive approaches me its because they want something out of me. I've been burned before.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:30 PM
3

What bothers me more is people bending over backwards about the guy and discrediting someone who may have been traumatized by sexual violence because they don’t like the word she used. I'm not discrediting her for what word she used. I'm discrediting her because she posted the video online, less than a day after she reported the incident to DoorDash. She posted the video to get clout. She never waited for the internal process of DoorDash to either finalize with a verdict or went to the police to…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:26 PM
6

Semantics. Semantics are important when it comes to the law and criminality. Genius. That's the whole point. There is a reason why in law specifically, terms are explicitly defined, as to not create confusion. Her going around and claiming she got sexually assaulted IS a big problem. Because that only DIMINISHES the people that truly have GOTTEN sexually assaulted. The term in the common social scene, has effectively lost all meaning because of this. Sexual Assault is when men stare at women, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:09 PM
1

Two days. She said that it took 2 days from report to action which got her fired. So realistically maybe a day after it went viral. Again, obviously a company will take a particular case OUT OF ALL THE OTHERS with the same possible merits a priority if it goes viral, but the problem still remains that she never let DoorDash handle it internally. She made it incredibly public from the start. Which means that yeah, DoorDash should have fired her as well. You don't want an employee disparaging your…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:01 PM
1

so they don't have to put up with the socially prescribed shit associated with dealing with men, or perhaps some long-standing trauma and bad past experiences. That still doesn't explain why they specifically look out for very attractive men tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:31 PM
1

You are taught in Security fields that if somebody insanely attractive approaches you, it's most likely a honeypot situation, and they want to get info or something out of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:27 PM
2

Casual reminder that people that are attractive tend to: have better mental health, have a wide pool of friends, have an overall more positive outlook on life than an average or ugly person, they tend to land jobs/interviews and promotions much quicker, and tend to be considered more competent in their work than average or ugly people. But it's SO hard to be attractive. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:19 PM
7

You need to learn how to read better. He clearly said that discouraging men from approaching, would only stop the men that are empathethic enough to treat women well. The men that are scumbags, will still keep approaching women and harassing them. So now, you effectively only made the problem worse, because only horrible men harass women when they approach, the men that treat women with respect have already agreed with you and decided to not bother women in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:17 PM
11

The equivalent would be that a woman pays a guy to fix her porch, and once he gets to her place, the door is "open", and she's seemingly sleeping on a couch, naked, not moving. Would that man then could claim that he was SA'd? Nope. Sexual Harassment? Maybe. But if he were to post that video on a social media, he would be called 100% a misogynist sex-obsessed pig that violated a woman's consent to her privacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:07 PM
7

Sexual Assault Including but not limited to rape, is defined as having committed any of the following acts: Any physical sexual contact that involves the use or threat of force or violence or any other form of coercion or intimidation. Any physical sexual contact with a person who is unable to consent due to incapacity or mental or physical impairment. “Incapacity” or “impairment” include but are not limited to being under the influence of alcohol or drugs orbeing too young to consent. Sexual Ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:00 PM
3

Uh, no. Like I said in another comment, he could get charged with indecent exposure, if the police deem it so and I wouldn't care, but the girl is clearly also in the wrong for not waiting for Doordash to make a response to her own report. She instead wanted to get clout on tiktok, and got herself fired.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:47 PM
5

https://x.com/FearedBuck/status/1980308730551165372 Here, you can see that the guy doesn't move nor is aroused. You are tripping.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:40 PM
7

https://x.com/FearedBuck/status/1980308730551165372 She had time to take the angle, open her camera, record him, and walk away without him moving or getting hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:40 PM
4

DoorDash's response likely was accelerated due to the spread of the video on social media. However, the problem still lies that she posed the naked man on tiktok for views. All she needed to do was wait until DoorDash did their job. If they didn't, then she could post it. But she literally took less than a single day to report to them and then post the video on Tiktok. Like I'm sorry, but name any large global company with millions of users and employees that makes a response to a particular rep…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:39 PM
4

https://manowarsecurity.com/doordash-girl-sa-original-video-tiktok-debate-controversy/ You can see that the guy is not moving, his dick isn't even hard and she's staring at him for a long time, enough to pull her phone and record it. Like you cannot think that this guy was conscious during the event. If he was conscious and had planned all of this, he has legit a Zen-like meditative state, because any guy who was perverted enough to try this would INSTANTLY be getting hard as she looks and feels…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:34 PM
1

You do understand that she took multiple videos, of both the guy, and then leaving. Not once did the guy move, not once did the door close after she left her shit. You can see her clearly talking on the video as she walks away from the door. So how can you tell that the guy not only was conscious, but actively planning on it when he never once reacted nor did she ever mention that the guy's dick was hard, indicating he was getting sexual gratification for what he "planned" to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:31 PM
6

She reported it first to DoorDash, then posted it to Tiktok to get views. Doordash first banned the customer, then when they saw that she posted the video on Tiktok, they banned her too. Just like Tiktok took down her videos for posting porn online. https://x.com/captainatomIDC/status/1980328944906956907/photo/1
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:27 PM
3

She even mentioned that he was passed out tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:25 PM
8

It was. Lmao. Here's some of the proof: https://np.reddit.com/r/doordash/comments/1oavooh/original_video_from_tiktok_doordash_sa_allegation/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:20 PM
4

She opened the door. She said so in the original video which she immediately deleted after getting called out, and then posted the SA one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:18 PM
10

It's unclear. Because in the original video, which she deleted, she had said that she OPENED the door and saw the man naked. At best, the man could be charged with indecent exposure, but thats a big iff, because he was sleeping in his own home.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:17 PM
1

You could make the argument that if both semesters are average in looks on a bell curve, yet women put more effort into their appearance, that would mean that men on average are naturally more attractive than their female counterparts, because they don't care about their appearance enough to increase their attractiveness. But that's a big stretch imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 04:23 PM
2

General trends create themselves. If general trends did not exist you would see a lot more variances in terms of attractiveness between lovers, but they usually tend to stick with their equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:36 PM
4

Depends. If we both work, then we both put the same effort into contributing to the expenses. Sure, this is relative to the amount of expenses and the wage disparity between us. If she's a housewife/not working, then keeping the living space clean, and maybe one hot meal a day. If she's working, we can alternate chores. I don't mind. She pays attention to me and truly asks how I'm doing. I don't express myself at all, so just talking about it is a huge relief sometimes. She isn't afraid of calli…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:31 PM
1

Let me guess, you've watched a few whatever podcast episodes where the women (largely onlyfans creators or sex workers) state they will only date men over 6ft or millionaires and now you've based your entire worldview around this? First of all, you are being way too aggressive for a simple debate. Secondly, no, I don't watch RP content, no content at all. I was one of the few RPers that just did what the original sidebar said to do: Read the essential list, which were around 5 books, lift and fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:08 PM
0

Nope, it's definitely what I said. This is just manosphere horseshit. Agree to disagree. Yes, that's the problem. Your interpretation of something that I never actually said. Because most people tend to say that when they refer to their closest people around them. Not strangers on the internet... The first boyfriend I ever had abused me, I posted online asking if anyone had been in a similar situation and a 'mgtow' subreddit picked it up and called me a 'relentless whore' and said I deserved it …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:00 PM
4

I'm not saying you, especifically, just that most people are downvoting it but not replying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:51 PM
-1

If anything, women largely deciding to abstain from dating and marriage is largely due to this. Or it could be because women's egos have increased, which lead to them rather being single than not being a man they "perceive" to be in their league... It's multifaceted, but both can be true. I never said anything about friends putting me down, try again. I interpreted this: Funny because I've been told that I must've been 'aiming too high' As your friends or families telling you that... Who else wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:50 PM
3

I'm eating downvotes but nobody is replying to it lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:48 PM
3

Exceptions don't make the rule: a rare or unusual instance does not change or invalidate a general principle or rule. The existence of an exception is simply a rare occurrence that does not disprove the general rule. If what you said is true. I'm sorry you went through that, especially about your friends putting you down by devaluing your self-worth. But your personal exp doesn't disprove the general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:45 PM
5

I get the sense from red pill that no woman is deserving of anything, especially of the coveted princess treatment, until certain criteria are met or their worth is proven. The problem is that most modern young women come with inflated ego and self-worth that they deserve everything just because of their existence. If a woman who is insanely attractive, intelligent, and successfully wants her partner to be that as well, most men or even red pillers wouldn't have a problem with that The problem i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:15 PM
4

Tbf, that goes with every branch of psychology. It's not as rigorous as everybody would like to believe. Including it's falsifyability. It's just easier to point the faults of evo-psych because It's more blatant in its justification: "We do this thing because in ancient times, this was advantageous." Etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:14 PM
0

TBF, you can be an average guy and still struggle because women in your area look or hope to find a much better person than you. Doesn't mean they can't be average.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 09:42 PM
–

Do they? I'd genuinely like to read them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:26 PM
–

They have more options which by numbers, would lead to them finding a better match... So it is easier to choose between 100 different matches, than to have no choices at all tho, if the purpose of the exercise is to find a match.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:22 PM
–

It means there are some aspects of RP they disagree with. For somebody that declares herself as no pill, you sure have a very black and white worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:15 PM
2

Life doesn’t give you positive reinforcement all the time When systematically you are raised to believe that you are on average worse than how you really are, you will develop that mental handicap, regardless. Elephants are one if nature's smartest and empathetic creatures, yet place a baby elephant inside a coral with a rope on a pole attached to it's leg, and it will grow up thinking that they will never be able to crush or walk over their corral, no matter how strong or tall they really are. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 03:48 PM
2

Either he’s decently attractive or he’s tall and handsome and hot. He was decently attractive and tall. If you want to call this hot. You can. I just meant that he wasn't going to be confused with runway male models. I think most people would agree with what I said. Only the purposely obtuse, don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:57 PM
4

You do understand that the guy was tall, AKA over 6 feet, handsome, and had a high status among his community? Him being over 6 feet meant he was part of only 14% of the male population that had that genetic feature. That plus him being above average in looks compared to the rest of the men + having a well respected position among the alumni meant he was flying far above average men. Like you can not be serious. He was, by all accounts, part of the Apex of men because of all his advantages, both…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:54 PM
8

You mean me... I described him as decently attractive. Men don't call men hot. He was handsome, just not model tier, just like the women were attractive but not models.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:39 AM
8

RP tells you that attractiveness and status supersedes all else including major character flaws a man has to women. He literally was proving RP right. Because these women were sleeping with a slob of a man, because he was attractive and had a prestigious position in the university.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 02:24 AM
2

She wasn't agreeing with me, because my point is not that I think china or india is good or bad. But rather that she went on to insult the wrong person that brought up both of those countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 02:21 AM
2

☕
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:41 AM
4

They had range, mostly between average and above average. They weren't models, but they certainly were mostly above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:39 AM
1

Okay, you really lack reading comprehension. The ORIGINAL PERSON that brought up SPECIFICALLY BOTH CHINA AND INDIA, was the WOMAN, NOT THE GUY YOU HAD ORIGINALLY responded to. Capeesh? Therefore, you responded to the WRONG person ABOUT USING those specific examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:38 AM
2

So go complain to the woman that mentioned those two countries as a rebuttal, not the person that mentioned how in those two countries, women get to still have their pick of the litter as a response to said comment made by the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:35 AM
2

In china there is disproportionately more men because of misogyny, what a dumb example. It would have been a dumb example... If it wasn't for the fact that the other woman mentioned both China and India... Two countries where arranged marriages are still commonly used... You need to learn to read. You insulted the wrong person because of that. lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:32 AM
6

From what I've seen, women can tolerate anything and everything as long as the guy has decent status and is attractive. I was roommates with a guy that showered once every 3-4 days, smelled like sweat, his room was a pigsty, you literally could feel when your shoes or feet stuck to the floor in his part of the house, did not do his share of chores, did not clean bathrooms, left the kitchen a mess, sometimes his entire being smelled so bad that we had to open windows, but he had a regular amount …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:25 AM
5

she just wants to come over to my house for the first date, we're absolutely NOT going to have sex at all because she isn't like that. She's just gonna get a cup of the most cheap ass coffee around at 12am bro. Duh
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:18 PM
5

I'm not sure either. I'm guessing it's the unicorn version of the perfect man? So a man that is attractive and confident as an "alpha" or "chad" but willing to settle down with the woman, and providing her with stability. Basically the 6/6/6 unicorn: 6 abs, 6 feet tall, 6 figure income, but willing to settle down with the average woman. That's my best guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:14 PM
12

Exactly. I remember how I used to carry out so many duties for female friends and get nothing in return. I basically just told myself that if they don't reach out on their own for something other than me helping them or me being their emotional tampon and geniunely were interested in talking in anything but their love life, or godforbid, were interested in my life, then they weren't really friends. Only one of them out of 8 or so female friends reached out just to talk about stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:29 PM
1

True... good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:06 AM
2

There's always the people that are outside of the norm. But usually the better looking a person is, the higher the chances that they have better mental health, a bigger friendship circle, healthier relationships, more chances of promotions and interviews, etc etc. So those people tend to have generally a more hopeful outlook on life too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:05 AM
1

At 1 am? In this economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:03 AM
1

Today was core and leg day. I'm sore. No partying for me tonight.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:47 AM
2

Heck I sympathies more with hot girls than I do with mid or ugly girls cause hot girls mostly are much better than mid or ugly ones who have a lot of attitude and shitty personality. Well, life on easy mode tends to make you have a better and more positive personality... Lookism does that to everybody that is attractive, men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:44 AM
3

Did somebody say Illuminati?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:43 AM
1

They may have insisted it was a situationship because they wanted a situationship. THAT'S WHAT I said. Literally from the start and what OP said. Most of the time, "situationships" are nothing more than wishful thinking from a single party, not something that both people somewhat understand. Literally, in my exp, situationships are when one person wants more and the other still treats them like a booty call, but the other person INSISTS that the relationship is more than just sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:35 AM
2

Because these men weren't dating them or spending time together outside of sex. They were FWBs in all but name. The women called it a situationship because they believed wrongly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:53 AM
3

I'm saying that these women were CALLING IT a situationship when it clearly wasn't. That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:45 AM
3

Because the guys in question were not really interested in a relationship with the women in hand... They actively were curving these women...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:01 AM
3

Considering that if I brought up the possibility of the relationship being a FWB instead of a situationship and they'd scoff at the idea, then I would assume yeah. They seemed open to the idea of actually dating the men, the men just had no interest in taking that step further.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:09 AM
9

Most of the times I've heard people say situationship Almost all of the times I heard the term, it has been said by women to describe a FWB, ex or co-worker that they hope the men ask them fully out, while in actuality the men continue to string them along. Often times because the men are non-committal in everything but name. I think I have only heard one or two guys mention the term, but it was the inverse, the girl was curving them in all but sex, but they were already pinning for her. I'm 27,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 11:03 PM
3

Ah. The Critical Drinker interpretation. Proof you guys don’t interpret anything in your own. She thought outside the box, yes. Lmao. If two people come up with roughly the same interpretation by watching the same media instance, one MUST be the sheep of the other. How small minded. But by the end of the montage she was out fighting, out running, and out climbing the men. She had the skills. Did you even watch the movie or even bothered to see the montage? Her main problem was that she couldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:53 PM
–

Because the main message behind Mulan's cartoon movie, is not that Mulan had special powers that only men had... it's that Mulan and all the other women were as capable as the men, they just need to think outside the box instead of trying to fight men head-on. Constantly throughout the movie, Mulan sees how men do certain things, and tries to replicate them, when they inevitably fail, due to her lack of physical prowess, she resorts to ingenuity, which culminates with her taking the final cannon…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:42 PM
–

Just like baby Anakin spinning cause that’s a neat trick destroying a ship. Which was heavily criticized and is still is... the only diff is that he was already poised to be the "chosen one", so literally he is on his own separate level in terms of powers. Luke using the force to destroy the Death Star after one inspirational talk from Obi Wan and not much else. You forget that they constantly mentioned how Luke was already training to be a pilot, and the classic throwaway line that hinted that …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:27 PM
3

Yeah, even when you have the stereotypical male protagonist that is stoic and is macho, they still struggle due to their circumstances that are mostly out of their control. You don't even really see that with girl bosses. If anything, most of the time, girl bosses just latch on to something that is external or somewhat disconnected from their own lives and that becomes their main motive throughout the time they appear on screen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:23 PM
11

Which again, sometimes that is not ACCOUNTED FOR in the WRITING of these ANTIQUATED laws. Which is WHY they should be REWORKED.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:03 PM
9

Your comment is just a lot of twisted verbiage to say “it’s my money”. No, what I'm saying is that current laws were not made in a time where women were commonly working alongside their husbands. So a lot of the wording was specifically designed to make it so that men gave more than what they right now should, because women back THEN did not work as they do NOW. Obviously things are different now, and the laws should be reworked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:40 PM
9

And men HATE those laws and actively want to overturn them I think it's less about actively overturning them and more like correcting them. Most divorce laws right now, like domestic violence laws/procedures, have it in wording that women should be protected because of their identity, and not because of the merits of a case by case basis. So ultimately, those laws and procedures ultimately overwhelmingly favor women, even if they realistically shouldn't. If the purpose or intent of those laws is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:33 PM
14

It's a bad thing that we don't have laws that are specifically designed to deal with situations where a divorce would lead one party stranded with no money, specially if that person just so happens to be the main caretaker of children of the recently failed marriage... right? Oh wait. We do!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:55 PM
2

And again, what does this have to do with what I said or who I was responding to. I responded to a chain of comments that stated that women tend to prefer slightly larger sized penises and then somebody else stating that men talk about boobs all the time, yet nobody posts about it here. Which I directly answered. Learn to read. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the common answer of women's preferences. I'm simply stating that if somebody posted the same thing as this post but with boobs and m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:23 PM
–

What does this have to do with what I said or who I was responding to?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:15 PM
–

Probably because men DON'T deny that big boobs are more attractive to the majority of the male population... The process in which you (often BPs or women) selectively ignore things when trying to make gotcha comments like yours should be scientifically studied. If you posted, "Men say that the size of boobs doesn't matter but look at how many men lust after Sydney Sweeney." Everybody would laugh at you because men never as a reasonable collective have stated that small boobs are better than big …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 06:03 PM
5

Most men just don't want to admit that they're not attractive enough for most women who they don't know to want to date them at first sight - even though this isn't even a new phenomenon. Isn't that what RP literally states, tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:43 PM
1

Oh so we are in the presence of royalty? Of course. It is I, The Devil's personal lawyer. I rule my own kingdom. than just one person who can see what a sad sack RP is. They are just better with the words than me. https://i.imgur.com/hqBg5NR.png
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:58 AM
1

all you have shown is me quoting. I get it. You want to bestow me with brilliance I don’t have. True, like a King that claps for the brilliance of the Jester you, sir are correct. And you even admit it would be glazing cause it’s so smart. https://i.imgur.com/aluzSnI.gif But I’m not that bright. Just read another comment and pointed it out. When it stops being true I’ll stop using it. https://i.imgur.com/1RthOvT.gif Truth must really sting to be ignoring it so much and just wanna follow a user a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:53 AM
1

I know a bunch of pillers are obsessed with me Not obsessed, just that your name sounded familiar. and insist I came up with brilliant lines, but like I’ve said before, just cause trigger bait trolls can’t understand YouTube/IG etc also have a comments section that can have insightful statements doesn’t make me brilliant by quoting them. Oh no, I could have understood that if you actually bothered to say that and be consistent on it: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/SyjcRMjaC3 My guy, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:44 AM
–

No, like I said, I saw you in the comment chain here acting all smug, and the name sounded familiar turns out it's the guy that lies and requotes himself. You sir are the peak, the apex of the redditors, and every discord mod wishes they could be on your level. Anyways I just wanted to say hi and to check if you still were going around lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:36 AM
1

No, no, I was asking you if you are still requoting yourself and passing it off as something somebody else had said before I called you out. Which was the last time I saw you in the comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:29 AM
1

Are you still going around re-quoting yourself, my guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:17 AM
1

Might make a post on this but I think I found out why I dislike most of the men on here. Okay. I was talking to an acquaintance of mine at the gym at we got to the topic of his dating life as he had a long term girlfriend Okay... And this got me thinking pretty much every man I’ve met in my life bar maybe 2 would hook up with plenty of women if they had the opportunity so Okay and? Again of at least a couple hundred guys I’ve known over the years every guy who is able to be a player has done so …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:14 AM
1

This sub doesn't have many controversial fallouts nor extremist users relative to the baseline members that make a post that is extremely unhinged that everybody clowns on them. The people that often post like that are trolls and the mods usually ban them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 10:51 PM
1

Straight up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 10:45 PM
8

I don't date women who shame fat people. Why? Because I was fat once. I know the struggle. So I already support fat men by treating them with respect and dignity, just like I do with fat women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 10:19 PM
1

Right. I don't disagree. But again, the male equivalent have worse experiences and negative connotations. So even these shamed women are still fairly ahead of their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:41 PM
0

Because the outspoken positive support is bigger than the negative support they receive... Getting 1 hate comment vs 10 other women showing their support quickly grows your ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:37 PM
5

Single mothers Single fathers are shamed, just differently. Single fathers often get treated as pedos by the other parents in schools. crazy cat ladies Ah yes, because the guy that has 1 roided up pitbull, wears reflective sunglasses, and either owns a big ass f-150 or a hummer is certainly not shamed or is the equivalent The "compensating for something" or "mid-life crisis men." Or you know... every weird uncle that is always single at family gatherings.... sluts and land whales Sluts are shame…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:29 PM
9

They also neglect that a big portion of those men simply end their lives... So their numbers are always balanced by their own self-destructige culling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:21 PM
2

Why doesn't the decent person ask if it's important to them? Because a decent person wouldn't force somebody to do so. They hope that their partner loves and respects them enough to come forward on their own. Jesus Christ. If they are so meek they can't even ask, then they're sure as shit not going to leave, so we're back to it not actually mattering that much. People would rather burrow their heads on the sand than topple the Sand Castle they built with somebody they love. That is not the same …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 01:10 AM
2

If it's important to the guy, why do women need to "come forward?" Because that's what a decent person should do. To be honest and come forward, if you have something that your new partner might find even just mildly uncomfortable, you come forward with it, because you respect and love them enough to understand that even if they might leave you for it, that it's better to build a relationship on openness and truthfulness than building a relationship upon lies and deceit. Aren't you f-ing blue pi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 01:01 AM
5

How are you always so good at avoiding the main point? They can't look away because they have no knowledge of their partner's number of sexual partners before them. Why? Because women do not come forward with that information if they know that it could destroy their current relationship. They either lie by omission or actively gaslight them by mentioning the popular statement: "The past doesn't matter," etc. You can not be serious, my guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:44 PM
2

Can't look the other way if they have no knowledge about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:35 PM
10

You are thinking way too small. A big portion of men's drive to further succeed professionally is to one day marry, buy a large house, and "settle down" with a wife, maybe have kids and whatnot. The "white picket fence" guys, if those guys were to all unitarily drop that hope/fantasy/motivation, the economy would tank. We would be talking about millions of men getting a small cozy apartment, with a gaming setup/hobby set up with the bare minimum necessities and just working as much as that lifes…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:55 PM
8

Slow eventual decline like Japan has, and just like Japan is doing, it would further push more movements/legislation towards globalization and mass emigration into the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:41 AM
4

No, women are repulsed by promiscuous men They are repulsed with *outwardly promiscuous men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:36 AM
5

There's also a redpillbook sub that is not quarantined (I believe) so if somebody needs the original lore, they can ask there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:32 AM
27

takeaway is that men need to find purpose in their lives and decenter women. If a majority of men did that overnight, a large majority of markets would collapse. Fingers crossed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:30 AM
2

You asked the men here what personality traits or standards they look out after already narrowing their search on slim or fit women that doesn't specifically have to do with having sex with them. I answered. You were the one complaining and whining about it. Don't get sassy on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:02 AM
1

have any desires on personality traits they want in a woman Average to above-average intelligence Average to above-average conversation skills Doesn't demean the guy's hobbies even if she personally doesn't see the point or thinks it's a waste of time and/or money. Perfectly content with sometimes not talking, and enjoy the sound of silence together Somewhat creative. I think that's like the standard that most men have but never say out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:58 AM
–

There are no signs, or they're hard to find. Everything might be going seemingly well but then the instant you get married and she can withdraw the pussy then BOOM, dead bedroom. No way to predict this could happen. I can't really disagree with your take, but in OP's own words, she already was voicing and indicating how hard she is to please before they married: Sex has never been great. I don’t view it as something that has ever brought us closer together, trying to make it pleasurable for me h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:22 PM
–

In it a woman marries the man she lost her virginity to, with both of them knowing full well the sex situation is far from ideal Well, in this case: Together 20+ years. Been together since teenagers, we’re our first everything. For years we had a dynamic where he was clueless since he had no experience, I wanted him to be assertive and know how to make sex pleasurable, and he wanted me to just know what would work for me, but of course with no experience I didn’t know. My sensitive brakes meant …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:58 PM
3

And what the post is stipulating is that women generally do look for the same physical standards in men, which results in society's standards of male beauty. Trends can and do change, only loosely, but to bluntly say that women don't follow or impose those standards is just nonsense. Again, if we also apply the "standard" thought that women generally have more dating prospects that then equal male counterparts, except at the Apex of beauty, then it is also more likely that as you go further and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:34 PM
4

The dorky kid from class can grow up to be a handsome dude, the start quarterback can let himself go and end up without any matches after peaking in high school. That is still playing into the same male beauty standards of society tho. A dorky kid grew up and became attractive, is not suddenly having an mass appeal because of his "negative" qualities, in this case, it would be: Being a dorky kid, he would have a mass appeal because he has the physical features of that coincides closer to the mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:16 PM
10

It's like somebody mentioning that they like all kinds of ice-cream but when you inquire deeper into their likes, it's just all super expensive brands of ice-cream. Like sure, they like all kinds of flavors of ice-cream, but they only attempt to select from the most expensive and premium brands they can find.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:10 PM
3

Game means able to adapt to the woman you are trying to woo. I know guys that play the stumbling fuckboi, the emotional fuckboi, the normal fuckboi etc. The point is that guys with good game know how to adapt to women and lean to their strengths.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:52 AM
9

Shrek 1 would probably be a better movie, than Beauty and the Beast in that regard. Beast was still ultimately a handsome guy, just cursed, when it was undone, he was still handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:49 PM
8

But women asking your job isn’t of being gold digger. She just wants to measure the future and your ambition. Thats it It's rather the tone of it. Some women do aggressively ask, and it's somewhat clear what their intentions are. She's evaluating a man for their money first, in many cases. It’s the same way man asking if women is good with kid or cooking. That means the guy is measuring the future with you. What matters is if the guy is helping you when you are overwhelmed with the kid or cookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:40 PM
21

I think it's rather less that they don't know the difference, but that they don't care as long as it doesn't personally affect them. I know a shit ton of succesful guys that treat service workers worse than slaves, and are generally aggressive to anybody that gives them the slightest bit of push-back, even just verbal but their respective wives and girlfriends happily strut along. It's not a problem for them, until that aggression becomes a fist onto their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 10:38 PM
1

Dude I don't have energy to get into gerrymandering and overrepresentation of conservatives in state legislation and how that impacts state by state abortion laws. This has nothing to do with what I said. Did you read? I said, states had already banned third trimester abortions BEFORE Roe V Wade was revoked. Most people follow the laws of those states. When the majority of states follow a certain law, the other states, generally follow through REGARDLESS of it's legal in their own states. Hence …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 06:06 PM
0

In 2014, around 40+ states had banned late-term abortions... obviously, when a large majority of the states inside the U.S. put something into law, most people and most neighboring states also generally follow the same thought process even if it's legal. Most people thought that before the overturn of Roe V Wade, all states where abortion was legal did not allow third trimester abortions except in case of medial emergencies. Your stat is literally a confirmation bias. Just because third trimeste…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 05:50 PM
1

Typically people find the first and second trimester more palatable without connecting the dots that a third trimester abortion overwhelmingly occurs because something is wrong with the fetus or the birth will very adversely impact the mother. Because of the phrasing of it. Most people find the first and second palatable WHEN IT COMES TO JUST CHOOSING to terminate the pregnancy. This means that if a woman is pregnant and in those stages and she chooses to abort, most people are fine with that. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 05:26 PM
1

Isn't that the crux of the issue? The phrasing of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 04:17 PM
–

username:IBribeMyBF makes post encouraging men to just buy submission from their women. has an earlier post detailing how she charged her bf for sex, and then cheated on him hmmmmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:07 AM
2

You know what's the worse thing? If I had been on the guy's side. I wouldn't have spoken up either. Why?. Because she wants a partner that is extroverted, likes to go explore different things, and see the world. She seems like an incredibly sweet girl, but I would no doubt think that she won't like me if I were to speak up and set up a first date. I'd bet my left nut that a part of those men self-excluded themselves in the same exact way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:00 AM
5

So the guy feels entitled to a certain treatment even if he isnt the same person Not necessarily entitlement, just that clearly he does not have the physical qualities that she most desires and feels strung along. I think most women would feel the same way if they found out that the guy they are dating who tends to be aloof, barely doing grand romantic gestures to them, had been attentive and commonly did grand romantic gestures to a number of women he dated before them. They would not necessari…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:49 PM
2

Because from the guy's perspective, the girl was more enthusiastic, more attracted, and more honest to the guy she skipped the dinner with than to him, the guy that did the "appropriate" steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:37 PM
2

Usually, it's because of the double standards. You could be a guy going in a nice date with a girl, having a good time, doing all the "right" steps to get her to open up and feel comfortable with you, end the date with hopefully a kiss or maybe more not knowing that same woman had went out with a guy, skipped the dinner and went straight into no-strings attached sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:13 PM
3

If he's happy and you are happy, nothing else matters, and should be left at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:01 PM
–

by the idea that the woman who's "alpha widowed" or a single mom is settling for an involuntary celibate who's barely had any relationship experience? Settling in my eyes involves somebody ending up in a relationship with somebody for convenience. Your example is literally one of the multiple types of scenario where you would classify it as settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 07:14 PM
24

Have hooked up with plenty of shorties but I don’t want to dilute my tall genes. Based. There's nobody more entitled than a 4'11-5'0 midget woman thinking she's on the same height (Ha!) as 6ft or even average height guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:47 AM
1

Prude, in this case, means prude to the beta. And I would wager that single moms are more sex avoidant for men they really don't physically want in the off chance of her getting pregnant again. Being a single mother to 1 child of a parent is hard enough. Imagine being a single mother to 2 children of 2 different fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 04:25 AM
1

Same with me. Left to my own devices, 100% of the boyfriends I’ve had turned out to be “nice guys.” Even the people I just got close to without dating were all that type. So obviously, my preference is nice guys. Because you directly said that those kinds of men in your formative years, never did their best to get your attention even to the point of your detriment or making you uncomfortable, and therefore never truly existed in your world. You then extrapolated that since you experienced that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:02 PM
1

Why I don’t remember the “nice guys”: they never talked to me, never shared snacks, never made any connection, never did anything noticeable—so I literally had no reason to register their existence. Yet you supposedly liked them. That's the problem. How can you like something that in your world does not exist? It's not possible. You didn't like them, because they did not exist to you, therefore, since they did not exist to you, they also had no reason to approach you, you were focused on other t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 09:59 AM
2

I am the kind of woman who likes that type of guy, yet in my younger years those boys didn’t even register in my awareness—I didn’t know their names, their personalities, nothing. Meanwhile, the popular Chads would go out of their way to talk to me even though I was a nerd, Out of simple gratitude, I ended up remembering their names whether I wanted to or not Even later, as adults, those “nice guys” would cross paths with me in places like school or a shared kitchen, and still wouldn’t say hi un…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:39 AM
6

And you don't think that most men wouldn't outright kill a man if they saw him raping a woman? Hell, why do you think rapists and child molesters are sent away from the general prison population? Because they are killed. Like what's your logic there?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:32 AM
8

Well if I told you that roaches understand consent better then men do you would be enraged despite it being a fact. Not gonna lie, even if I tried my very best to sound unhinged, I would not be even close to your level. Jesus Christ. Also invading privacy isnt such a bad thing when you know there are pedophiles all around the world. A small trivial sacrifice for a better society, regardless though technology will take over so we have to adapt to these systems regardless. You right, Send me your …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:20 AM
8

Just about all other forms of those are a form of protection or a joking way of saying a wild animal is safer then a man. Yeah, you definitely are a gold pill. You do see the best in people. Tea app exsisted so women can safely navigate dating as much possible regardless if those claims are true or not Oh yeah and the USA Patriot Act exists so the U.S. can protect us regardless of the claims that they could be invading people's privacies/massive surveillance are true or not. Men had their own te…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:08 AM
11

Let's see: Kill all men, check. Teach men not to rape, check. Metoo, check. sprinkle sprinkle, check. Man or Bear? check Tea app, being used to both disparage and doxx men, with no restrictions or evidence provided needed to make claims against these men, check. Gee, I wonder why younger men are becoming more and more hateful of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 02:35 AM
2

Because I'm responding to this part of your comment: If you want to act all blurry about consent and be a piece of shit about harming other people (and genuinely do something unforgivable), go for it, but also - don’t be surprised that you suffer the consequences of your actions whether it be legal consequences, people avoiding you and disliking you, etc Yeah, let's tell the ugly men to act blurry about consent and be pieces of shit, just because the attractive men do so too. When the consequenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:57 AM
2

and then you turned around and made it about lookism Are you slow in the head my guy? I responded to a person saying that people that are redpillers would take to mean that despite your post, you believe that women prefer men that are persistent to the point of violating consent. Which was one of my main points. That it's still largely subjective on both the man and the woman, and that subjectivity is *compounded even further by lookism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:52 AM
2

No, not your post, the comment you made: I mean - is the law the best arbiter of morality? And even then, many rules are arbitrary and while yes, at worst you’ll be a nuisance to some (assuming we’re looking at this discussion from the obvious “they didn’t do something that harms others” route), you’re ultimately not hurting anyone. At worst you’re a little inconsiderate and reckless - but far from a morally bad person lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:46 AM
2

I responded to the assessment of another person. Which I agreed with him, you then decided to completely disregard it, saying it has no bearing on the post itself. So, like I said before, you responded to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:41 AM
2

Well I wasn't talking to you. You responded to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:39 AM
2

Usually at least for me, when I describe a man as an asshole it's the type of guy that enters a group, with no disregard for anybody else, it's very abrasive, loud, interrupts others as they speak, high off his own farts... etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:37 AM
3

The discussion is about how the term “bad boy” is often used as shorthand for “masculine, maybe rouge-ish man who gets the girl that I’ll use to prop up my moral standing to feel better about myself” My brother in christ, boys learn this back in high school. Like I said, you aren't bringing anything new or insightful to the topic. Hell, people make memes about Falling In Reverse's song about it since it released: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IMoSgaKivs0
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:33 AM
2

This goes for ugly and hot people as a whole - regardless of gender. Hot women get away with a lot more than ugly women. Yes, the halo effect. this isn’t what this discussion is about Your original disscusion literally ended with your second paragraph, there's nothing else to discuss about that: Now, with the obligatory ‘yes sometimes this does happens’ out of the way, we can get to the real meat of this topic: Like you didn't make or provide any extra info or anything meaningful right after. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:29 AM
4

But the entire problem is that the standards to apply the consequences are ENTIRELY different for both sets of men. Like I said before, an attractive man and the ugly man can both do the SAME amount of actions, whether or not they are morally reprehensible in reality, yet suffer different consequences, both good and bad. The majority of "nice guys" that are just starting to get into that mindset, hear that women want to be respected, treated with both kindness and fairness, and to not be bothere…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:20 AM
6

You are correct. That is exactly how I interpreted what OP said. The problem with what OP is trying to say it's that it is still rather subjective for both the man and the woman being approached. Specially if you take into account the attractiveness of the man approaching. A hot guy acting persistent on a woman is sign of commitment, dedication, and good nature, he only wants her after all, an ugly man acting persistent on a woman is a sign of social shamelessness, inconsideration, neediness, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:11 AM
6

The problem is that in the case of the WNBA, they do not want to go through the same hurdles that the original NBA did, like low wages at the start, lack of funding, etc. The players want the entire world to treat them and pay them as LeBron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 07:02 AM
–

Omg you are basing this off what kids and teens say? As if their understanding of the world is almost ever correct. What I'm saying is that what people learn and go through during their FORMATIVE YEARS impacts their adult life. We have tons of studies of how socio-economics can impact a person's academic and professional life or how a child that lives in an abusive environment is more likely to perpetuate it when they are adults, how is it any different when it comes to the ideas that are reinfo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 03:49 PM
1

Omg you are basing this off what kids and teens say? As if their understanding of the world is almost ever correct. What I'm saying is that what people learn and go through during their FORMATIVE YEARS impacts their adult life. We have tons of studies of how socio-economics can impact a person's academic and professional life, how is it any different when it comes to the ideas that are reinforced on a child? Literally nobody is victimizing themself, like learn to read. All I'm saying is that not…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 03:38 PM
–

I'd say both genders, since both tend to both watch and like romcoms but women tend to have a slightly bigger audience that engages in that genre: https://today.yougov.com/entertainment/articles/45146-americans-relationship-romantic-comedies-poll I did not blame men nor women for what these media portray. I simply said, that women being bluntly honest is a relatively recent thing and that the culture surrounding female sexuality was different barely 10-15 years ago, which was around the time tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:45 PM
–

Examples of the trope? The Girl Next Door (2004) Love at First Hiccup (2009) I Love You, Beth Cooper (2009) Chuck, Tv-show (2007-2012) She's Out of My League (2010) Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010) Those are the first few of the top of my head that generally sent that message.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:29 PM
–

If it was so obvious, then how do you explain the rise of red pill content in the 2020s? if it was so obvious, then why did men, specially young men start consuming so much of that content, or how do you explain the sudden increase of people going to gyms, specially among Gen Z? It wasn't as obvious as you argue it was. Women nowadays are more honest than they did when we were teens and kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:21 PM
–

It's not blaming Disney movies, it's the entire culture SURROUNDING female sexuality in media and the culture in general. I mentioned disney, because it's the most obvious and popular examples of that type of presentation, but they aren't the cause of it nor do I blame them. it's like mentioning the term: Whedonspeak, which is when a movie tends to have dialogue that heavily relies on quips, usually in sarcastic or self-referential manner to describe either a character/situation or the entire pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:06 PM
–

Even so, it's relatively new. Most men that are in their early to late 20s still grew up with the disney-romanticization of female sexuality that was perpetuated in almost every type of media/colloquial culture. Unless you grew up in "abnormal" cultures, like impoverished areas and what not, you were taught that women valued virtues over attractiveness, and any time somebody would claim otherwise, they would be heavily criticized.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:58 AM
3

If you dont like how feminists see male sexuality as disgusting and degrading…..how about calling out loudmouths normalizing toxic behavior as “men being men” and/or blaming women for that toxic behavior? This happens constantly in any and every form of levels of society. In schools, in colleges, in the professional setting, in the legal settings etc etc. Do some scenarios slip through the cracks? Of course, but virtually anybody that has been born at least from the late 1980s to now in the west…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:40 PM
1

Only when convenient for the leftists
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 06:37 AM
4

TBF it's not any attention, but they lose most of the attention, which is par for the course for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 12:35 AM
2

If you really want somebody to deconstruct OP's points I'll gladly take the lead: In his first topic, his argument is that not every woman inherently looks for casual sex and therefore there is very little point of a guy being a chad because most women won't have casual sex. Which is true. But nobody is arguing otherwise. Nobody is arguing that chad will make every woman drop their panties in a flash the moment they enter a room, they argue that if a woman is OPEN to the IDEA of a casual sex, sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:14 PM
14

My brother in christ, you are literally engaging in a post that is using one of the most said phrases by women online explaining why it is stupid and not accurate to what women really feel and think about all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:28 PM
1

It doesn't matter who doxxes somebody else. It is still wrong, how is that so hard to understand? Is killing a man not bad if the killer is a woman? Tea app let users post anything and link it to the man's profile. Including their current residential address, their work address etc: https://np.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/1m9ygic/you_can_no_longer_lie_about_what_the_tea_app_is/?ref=share&ref_source=link On the app you can literally set notifications to be notified every time a foll…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:55 PM
2

No, I am saying that we know that doxxing people is wrong. Doxxing people has been down for a millenia, even then, the "first" cases that didn't involve actual neo-nazis were against men, wikipedia has a brief history about it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing We already knew doing people is wrong. The tea users and the users that promote and use the fb groups of "Are we dating the same man?" Don't care about dozxing being wrong. In any case, they love it, as longas it is not done to them.…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:38 PM
1

Finding the argument that "I am right, because I am right" not substantive is entirely correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:26 PM
1

It is too late, I have drawn myself as the chad and you as the soyjak Just because you are certain of something, does not make you correct, specially when you don't criticize my arguments with anything substantive, or with substance, but you rather keep reiterating that you are right because you are right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:05 PM
4

What I said, is that the people that are suddenly finding that doxxing people is bad, is when it was done to the female gender, before that, it was fine, it was so fine it got to the 1# of the App Store. If the female gender hadn't gotten doxxed in such a massive way, nobody would be claiming that doxxing men in the same way is not okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:56 PM
4

but you’re saying it’s okay to do it to someone if they do it to you first. ...... What I replied: Person B: "I'm not laughing at you because you are fat, I'm laughing at you because you made fun of other fat people, then you became fat and are now whining that other people shouldn't do the same onto you."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:53 PM
5

I have, and when I see something like that, you know what I do? I report it, so that these channels and servers get banned, as they should. The clear blatant "whataboutism" coming from you doesn't work as a baseline for the argument you are trying to make. Very few people, if at all, were defending these types of servers/comments/websites, than the people that properly shame, report, and find it appalling that they exist in the first place. I don't claim to support revenge porn, or anything that…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:35 PM
9

where tf are they being protected? They were being protected by the numerous blogs/articles/users defending the use of a borderline defamatory app, which btw it was BANNED IN THE E.U. for VIOLATING THEIR PRIVACY LAWS, under the guise that they are only talking about predatory men, that "should" be doxxed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:30 PM
1

I have: np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1mcieqs/the_new_tea_app_kinda_proves_hypergamy/n5v8kws/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:25 PM
12

men have been rating women by looks and sharing information about their ex, including spreading revenge porn, for much longer than the tea app has existed. And so have women. Not only that, but we have had NUMEROUS examples where it was clearly shown to be wrong. Case in point, the first "original" women rating website, "FaceMash" made by Mark Zuckerberg when he was at Harvard, by compiling all the public available photos of the female alumni in the school and then making a rating system out of …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:23 PM
–

Person A: laughs and makes fun of fat person. Person B: "Hey, you shouldn't make fun of fat people." Person A: "Shut up, I can do what I want, because it's legal, you can't tell me what I can make fun off." Less than 24 hours pass Person A is now fat. Person A now wants nobody to make fun of them for being fat. Person B now laughs at them. Person A: "Hey you are a hypocrite!" Person B: "I'm not laughing at you because you are fat, I'm laughing at you because you made fun of other fat people, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:27 PM
7

Person A: "Laughs and makes fun of fat person." Person B: "Hey, you shouldn't make fun of fat people." Person A: "Shut up, I can do what I want, because it's legal." Some time passes Person A is now fat. Person B now laughs at them for being fat. Person A: "Hey you are a hypocrite!" Person B: "I'm not laughing at you because you are fat, I'm laughing at you because you made fun of other fat people, and then you became fat." Apply that with Doxxing people and the argument is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:13 PM
–

user comments:"explain how this isn’t hypocritical" another user responds to that comment and explains why it isn't original user types: "i love having a man confidently educate me, a woman, on how women think and why they do the things they do it will truly never get old" Somehow user thinks they are in the right ???? profit Don't want people to reply to you? Don't ask questions. That simple. I didn't even realize you were a woman until i read your reply to me, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:59 PM
–

It's not hypocritical because nobody went ahead and made an app to target, belittle, and defame women anonymously, without any verifiable info. Tea app did that for men, most of the women who downloaded that app didn't because of "security" or because of their actual abusive experiences, they did so to both drama farm/read and to defame their benign, but negative experiences of the men they dated. Ironically, the app that claimed to be made for the "security" of women, turned to be have been... …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:54 PM
1

I did. The majority of the jobs were nonsensical. Hence why I mentioned the first one to highlight how atupid most of them are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 05:51 PM
-1

oki-doki. women's health not being studied? Women's health differences are being studied, tho... that's why we know they sometimes have different symptoms than men... just like we know that black people are more prone to sickle-cell, etc. autism and adhd being underdiagnosed in girls? female oral contraceptives and not male ones? Trust me, a majority of men would gladly take contraceptives if it meant not having to worry about going in raw. The difference is that women make one egg per month, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:52 PM
1

Doesn't take much to notice their slop. I used to live with 2 other roommates, one of them, didn't shower, didn't clean his part of the room didn't clean bathrooms, left messes everywhere, but he would get routinely laid, how did I know? Because he used to bring the dates to the apartment. Women 100% tolerated his disgusting lack of hygiene because these women ROUTINELY would keep going to him, even after knowing how he kept his room and side of the apartment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 11:13 PM
5

I highly doubt it. Wasn't there a website that was dedicated to exposing models/attractive women in IG that were either or were willing to be paid to be prostitutes in Dubai, even to the point of having sex with literal children/animals and have the men defecate on them and then have the woman eat it? Wasn't that website shut down for the same reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 10:45 PM
1

That's my point. The men that can't wipe their own ass, but get consistent dates are not average/ugly men, they are way attractive than the average. They have no incentive to change, because just like the current woman tolerated his lack of hygiene for a while, so will another one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 10:33 PM
3

Very few women only focus on the physical part. They want partners they have shit in common with. Men are more likely to only focus on physical attraction. If that was true, there wouldn't be so many complaints from women about the men they date. How the basic "standards" are on the floor etc etc. They primarily choose on looks, and hope the man fits, the problem is that the man that is attractive enough for women to ignore red flags, will continue to do red flags because they know that even if …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 10:13 PM
2

How many women have you cold approached? I have been on a steady relationship right now for like a month or so... And I repeatedly made it clear that men are to do this with multiple women. Not “putting their eggs in the same basket”. And you don't understand that you can do this while still cold approaching women on the regularly, which is what TRP and PUA tactics already promoted, if you bothered to read the books. But if we are talking about what is the best way to get a date, by only choosin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:31 PM
0

Because you last thread pressumed too much. You argued that it's better to put your eggs in the same basket and hope that it either sprouts or doesn't: Most of the men here don’t seem to understand the concept of getting to know a woman over time. For example, if you see a pretty lady who goes for walks around your neighborhood daily, say hi every time you see her. Make some small talk. After a while get to know her name and if she seems interested or not. If she doesn’t, then don’t ask her out.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:23 PM
2

So in this case the people with more power determined that being emotional is bad and being stoic is good. That's literally NOT the purpose or what the study is trying to show. The whole point of the study if there is a link between verifiable DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS, that are ALREADY standardized in psychology and checking if there is a LINK between somebody THINKING that somebody else criticized them. Nobody is arguing that being stoic is good, just that feeling like you received negative criticis…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:13 PM
2

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-025-03322-6 If you bothered to read at least the abstract of the study, you would have learned how they determined the standards of the study: Data were from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (waves 1–9; 2002–2019). Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 8-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, and a cut-off value of ≥4 was used to define clinically significant depressive symptoms. We included participants aged ≥50…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:40 PM
-2

You said men came with up with the "sensitivity standard" and that's why we shouldn't use it as a real standard. I said, funny, because women came up with all of these different buzzwords, and yet all of those words act like Schrodinger's cat, they all are simultaneously everything, and nothing at the same time, only when it is convenient to the feminists, do they have any actual definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:33 PM
2

This is from a 100% male perspective "The data also revealed a clear difference between men and women. Women were more likely than men to report depressive symptoms in response to perceived criticism across all categories. For instance, women who reported even a little criticism from a spouse, child, or friend were more likely to experience depression during the follow-up period. For men, only those who reported a lot of criticism seemed to be at increased risk." It's been said here before that …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:30 PM
-2

Ironically, isn't that why the terms "Toxic Masculinity", "Masculinity" "Femininity" are all over the place? Because women/feminists use them to mean whatever they want at any given time?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:26 PM
2

Maybe, but social standing also plays a role in men's attractiveness, femcels will still probably ignore the average guy if he's socially awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 01:22 AM
3

Brother, literally caught you lying in 4k, lmfao what are you on about? Like if I were you I would delete that entire account and make a new one to troll here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:11 PM
3

Hmmmmm https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1m2cj40/female_extremists_and_male_extremists_mutually/n3omzed/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:09 PM
4

Oh BTW, check out my edit, decided to be extra petty and search out his reddit account: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1m2cj40/female_extremists_and_male_extremists_mutually/n3omzed/ Dude is actually roleplaying lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:06 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if this is the same person managing the Lillith account. Both of them engage the same exact way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:16 PM
9

You have 144,276 Karma. Holy shit I have 125,798 and I've been a redditor for 8-9 years. Jesus.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:10 PM
7

What you and those communities did is called: Argument from fallacy An argument from fallacy is the idea that even if a person's argument itself is fallacious or not, is not, in itself, proof that the conclusion stemming from that argument is false. An example taken from wikipedia: Alice: All cats are animals. Ginger is an animal. Therefore, Ginger is a cat. Bob: You have just fallaciously affirmed the consequent. You are incorrect. Therefore, Ginger is not a cat. Whether or not Alice is correct…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:05 PM
–

Considering the way he replies to the comments, pretty sure the person behind that account is just role-playing a person they really aren't. Like I have rarely seen an account online as blatant in their lies as that account. What a weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:55 PM
7

He was banned from a feminism sub for being anti-feminist. No he wasn't. The post itself that got OP banned is right there. It is EXACTLY what people complain about tribalism communities. That communities would rather outright reject or deny an issue, rather than address it, and the communities themselves outright proved OP's assertion by banning the post and OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:53 PM
3

It isn't relevant to the discussion at all. Unironically your comments only read as if you are entirely roleplaying a person you really aren't. Which I would bet my left nut that it would be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:51 PM
8

Who Is outright banning? https://i.imgur.com/ksfrY4G.png OP literally provided evidence of mods from those communities banning his post and OP. If you bothered to actually read said post you would have known this. Again, you are just proving my point entirely brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:47 PM
6

I added that detail because it’s a pertinent detail. Whether or not she was a FWB has no bearing on the actual discussion of both the post itself, or your fake quote of "her". It was just placed there to try to appear better than what you really are. It's usually used by most people when they lie while they tell a story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:44 PM
5

Nah, i actually had a feminist friend who I used to debate in college (she became a FWB for a bit) so I actually have real world experience with real feminists I think the fact that you had to include that she was a "FWB", only serves to prove that she's most likely a work of fiction in order to self-aggrandize your social value and somehow appeal to an authority. Which is a massive fallacy to begin with. But hey, more power to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:38 PM
11

No, the only delusion here is out of your own creation. OP tried to bring up a topic inside multiple other communities only to be met with instant bans and refusals to engage or criticize said topic entirely. The fact that it was entirely done online has no bearing on the merits (or lack thereof) of the topic itself. You can argue that OP was wrong, or that OP is incorrect, which they very well may be, but instead of engaging in said topic and picking apart it's flaws, they would rather just out…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:35 PM
–

Person creates a post trying to address how extremism of an ideology that actively targets a group, can lead people of said group into siding with a different ideology to defend themselves Shows evidence of multiple communities related to the first ideology banning their posts and refusing to engage, without providing any criticism random redditor high on his own farts then replies to the post, with his own quote, while trying to pass it off as if somebody else said it in order to sound smart: “…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:22 PM
15

Out of curiousty I searched that quote online and only found his comments. Pretty sure he's just quoting himself. Made this edit after 50 or so minutes: Since I woke up today on the wrong side of the bed, and decided to be petty, I searched his quote with reddit's own comment searcher, here's what I found: In this very same thread, the dude said that the quote "Came" from a former "FWB" feminist friend he had: Nah, i actually had a feminist friend who I used to debate in college (she became a FW…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:10 PM
0

Aggressive means trying to harm others. Sigh... Let's look at the dictionary: 1.A: tending toward or exhibiting aggression aggressive behavior 1.B: marked by combative readiness an aggressive fighter 2.A: marked by obtrusive energy and self-assertiveness a rude, aggressive personality 2.B: marked by driving forceful energy or initiative : enterprising an aggressive salesman 3: strong or emphatic in effect or intent aggressive colors aggressive flavors 4: growing, developing, or spreading rapidly…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:49 PM
1

I wasn't trying to sleep with those women and broke off those types of relationships once I realized that's how they would always treat me. That's the funny thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 04:43 PM
8

I think the proposal of befriending women in the hopes one of them matches you up with another distant friend, to be wildly overstated. You can befriend women, but don't expect anything other than maybe genuine friendship back. The amount of instances that I have personally seen a guy join a mixed or mainly female group, that managed to get at least a date from a friend of the female friends not in the group, is 5. Out of those 5, 4 of them were friends of the group for at least 3-6 months, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:31 PM
4

The term "Aggressive" in that sentence doesn't specifically mean trying to actively harm somebody else. Also, that sub is heavily moderated now after getting kicked off the default sub list, primarily because of those types of posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:21 PM
67

Insert all the Buzzfeed articles rating male olympians and other athletes by their bulges
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:05 AM
14

https://redditmetis.com/user/BrightAutumn12 They are from India.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:51 AM
17

I don't know that OP is a typical male. I also don't believe they're from a Western country. https://redditmetis.com/user/BrightAutumn12 He's indian, so take what he says with a grain of salt. In my experience, they tend to roleplay other ethnicities/countries of origin when they are online.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:49 AM
1

I'm just pointing it out because lots of men here don't believe in professional help and get mad whenever someone mentions it. Because nowadays, especially younger women tend to use therapy as a catch-all dismissal of problems. In this sub, we mostly talk about the societal tendencies/trends/problems caused by male-female social dynamics. We aren't necessarily talking about the individual case by case basis. The problem is that again, men here bring up either problems that are caused by society …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:59 AM
4

Most men wouldn't want either the heat or the blackmail sex. Some men would. Find a hole and you will eventually find a man willing to put his dick in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:39 PM
14

My comment: If a young woman increasingly finds herself dating horrible men, it is entirely their own fault, just like an attractive young man who finds himself consistently dating horrible women. You; I mean you can say the same thing about men who have horrible dating experiences as well. Person can write yet cannot read, more news at 11.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:47 PM
35

Women may find it hard to find a suitable partner I think the problem is that it's almost entirely their own fault. They have numerous men seeking to date the woman. They have the options, and they control the men who are allowed to date them by setting whatever standards they want to. If a young woman increasingly finds herself dating horrible men, it is entirely their own fault, just like an attractive young man who finds himself consistently dating horrible women. Both these kinds of people s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:35 PM
2

->"guys can experience trauma from rejection" -> "Nuh Uh" -> I link a source that explains how repeated rejection can cause trauma -> random reply snarkly requotes half a sentence that says that men who have trauma from rejection should seek professional help as if that's either a clap back or somehow invalidates my reply itself My dude. The whole reason why I linked that source is because women were arguing that rejection can not cause trauma, when in fact, it can. Your reply is meaningless and…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:07 PM
3

Nobody is saying that we have to combat this. The person above me was trying to rationalize how men can't get trauma from rejection, showed them otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:51 AM
–

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1394653/Move-to-outlaw-secret-DNA-testing-by-fathers.html This was one of the original proposals done in the UK for a similar law. It states clearly that it had both to do with children not being able consent to their own DNA sampling, and therefore unethical and because it would bring psychological damage to the child. I agree with the first portion of the reasoning, but the second one, which is what was disputed in this very comment section, unfortunatel…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 12:43 AM
–

DNA testing a child does not cause direct harm to the child. It is not an invasive procedure. It would only cause indirect harm if it turned out that the father is not the child's biological father.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 12:19 AM
5

Ngl I would have too. Random girl drives your car, takes you someplace else that very well could be extremely isolated. That sounds like the start of a group assault, theft or murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:09 PM
6

Hmmmmm: https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/love-sex/what-is-rejection-trauma-and-what-are-the-signs/amp_etphotostory/102198502.cms Rejection trauma, also known as rejection-sensitive dysphoria (RSD), is a psychological disorder where there is an intense emotional response when someone is rejected or criticised. It can affect an individual's emotional well-being, self-esteem, and social interactions. It may not be recognised as a formal diagnosis in …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:04 PM
–

"Regarded" is to skirt terms of service, a popular lingo right now in internet culture: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Well%20regarded Like I said. Regarded. But considering you didn't understand it, you would probably be one of those people that would respond to popular internet references with the "correct" grammar not understanding that the incorrect spelling of the word itself points to a specific reference like: "Nothing personnel kid." There's a specific popular term for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 10:22 PM
–

The sentence is clear as day. Stop being purposely obtuse. Oh BTW, if you are simply too regarded to understand the sentences above, let me spell it out for you: Clear as day = very easy to see or understand. Purposely obtuse = deliberately refusing to understand a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 05:01 PM
11

It's also that at least for me, most women that I have been friends with, have treated our friendship in almost entirely transactional one-way. I have to hear her, I have to help her, I have to do her favors, I have to make an effort to be present, I have to accommodate for my presence (gotta keep my emotions positive, any negative emotions can be perceived as either wimpy or abusive) etc, all of that flows one way, and it's to them. If I need help, they aren't necessarily going to do the same s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:09 PM
1

Well, that's because TRP also preaches hot and cold games Which are essentially shit tests women unconsciously employ already. But it's only a problem when men do it. ☕️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:34 PM
1

Oh, bullshit. Women have been running for office more, and winning more for the last century, but especially over the last couple of decades. I would hope so, considering that it's been ~140 years since they were allowed to work and 105 years since society recognized their right to vote. You now: But it's also disingenuous not to acknowledge that yes, it's a lot more work and a lot more risk if you're a woman. Me back a single comment: I'm puertorican, AKA a latino, if I want to run for presiden…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:00 PM
3

Women who do run for (and women who win races) also receive a disproportionate amount of harassment, threats and violence. As do people of color. And yet women refuse to vote for women officials. And before we get into some bullshit about how women just need to be braver - remember that plenty of white men are leaving office because of harassment and threats to their families. If you want to break the glass ceiling, somebody has to climb and break it themselves. That's the problem I personally h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 06:42 PM
8

Ever seen the show Alone? It leaves people alone in the wilderness for a few months to see how well they survive alone. In isolation from the pressures of society, the men almost uniformly begin to let themselves cry and be more sentimental than they do when they're around people. Ever seen the show The Island with Bear Gryllis?, in one of the seasons, men and women were grouped by their gender and left to themselves Men thrived while women almost starved to the point of needing to be flown out,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:11 PM
7

SOME men try to lead. Many of them fail. Which again, demonstrates how obviously it doesn't come naturally to men. Are you being obtuse on purpose? I'm saying that there is a clear difference between men naturally seeking leadership and actually being good leaders. The "naturally" part of my arguments comes from an innate drive to want to lead, not because I think they all become good leaders. It still remains true that MOST men don't lead. MOST men follow just as comfortably as women. Most men …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 04:44 PM
7

Which clearly disproves both the idea that men are naturally good at leading and that women are naturally submissive and need to be lead. First of all, I never said that men are naturally good leaders, I said that men are naturally TRY to lead and seek leadership positions. Big difference. Second, the outliers of trends don't disprove the trends itself. If men are on average taller than women, does that mean that no woman is taller than an average man? No, it doesn't. Just because some women hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:55 PM
3

Because Kamala Harris was an unpopular candidate even inside the democratic voter base. She was dead last during her own primaries, vowed out, got picked up by Biden speicfically because of her identity and not her merits, which he admitted, and then instead of being given the democrats time to choose their own candidate to go against Trump, the democratic leader decided to push Kamla anyways. And this was during a time where Democrats where incredibly fragmented, with both Israle-Palestine and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:35 PM
9

Why are people taking words in the very literal sense? The reason humans explored was because some humans wandered out from their "cozy" known lands and went out, these people often had to lead groups or were lead by another. I'm using ancient humanity's exploration of unknown lands to explain how leaders naturally came to be. It's an analogy. Some people wanted to venture beyond, and often they had to lead others that would follow them that did not have the same drive as them to explore. I also…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 12:19 PM
8

And if men want relationships they should just get one. That's all it takes. If they don't, it's their own fault. Not society The difference between the two, is that women have more control in BOTH the people that get elected and dating. Women control both barriers of entry. If a person runs for office, he has a higher chance of getting elected if they focus more on women's issues than men's. They are not the same issues. Not even at a glance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:01 AM
6

You need a citation that “not all men in leadership roles are good at leadership”? That somehow, all women in leadership roles do excellent. People who are natural leaders don’t complain that people don’t do what they want. They use their natural leadership skills to inspire people to do things. This is VERY modern take on leadership, btw. Do you think the men that were living in caves actively tried to charismaticaly navigate his group's lazyness or insubordination? Let me tell you, it wasn't. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:59 AM
6

It's not mysoginy. Like run for office. And vote for them. That's all it takes. If women don't want to, it's their own fault. Not society or the boogey "misoginy" man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:52 AM
14

Nah, that was starvation You do understand that risk-seeking is not just used when it's for fun activities, right? If a group is starving, the risk-seekers will be the ones that will go out and try to get food for the rest. It could be argued that leaders don't take risks Leaders do take risks. It's why we do value them so much. They take risks because they HAVE to keep their group alive and thriving while navigating their current circumstances, and if they fail, they either die or be shunned by…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:48 AM
10

Men are more likely to be PUT in leadership roles. That doesn’t mean men are naturally good leaders. As proven by how many men suck in leadership positions (and how many women do excellent.) Citation needed. If men were natural leaders, there wouldn’t be so many men on this sub complaining that they don’t want to have to be in charge of planning dates or asking women out. Men in this sub complain about having to be in charge of courting without ever having anything in return. If a guy has to do …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:45 AM
24

Risk-seeking behavior is what led to humans crossing seas, trekking jungle, and moving place to place. The idea is that risk-seekers are more prone to leadership roles because if they fail, they risk more. Yes, risk-seeking =/= leadership, but being a leader and making DECISIONS involves TAKING risks. A naturally risk-avoidant person will not naturally choose to place themselves in a leadership role, hence why men are often looking and being placed in leadership roles more than women are. That's…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:34 AM
43

We aren’t actually naturally dominant nor are we more likely to succeed. The sooner we stop pushing narratives that men are naturally “superior”, the sooner we’ll stop expecting men to naturally be superior. That's not true at all. Men are more likely to take on leadership roles or take risks in general. The REASON why not every man is in leadership roles is that NOT EVERYBODY can be a captain of a crew. Nobody is saying that men are naturally superior, but the idea that men somehow aren't typic…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:29 AM
11

I assure you, nobody cares about a 25 year old dating a 21 year old outside of a few, very radical voices. I read somewhere that the average relationship age gap is around 3 years, and it's usually the man that is older. Which makes sense. Women want a guy that is slightly more established than people of her age, without them being in a completely different world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:23 AM
7

If “preselection” is real, and girls are supposed to be more attracted to guys they know other girls want Preselection only works if you have demonstrated you can pull a girl. Preselection doesn't supersede a guy's neediness to a specific girl. I knew a guy in high school that every girl in our class had a crush on, but he was so hyper-fixated on a girl from an entirely different class, that his neediness outshone everything else. Dude was getting massively curved along by that girl, and he stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 11:59 PM
3

Their image is a "have to". Celebrities are run by marketing teams. Again, ALL GENDERS have to go through that inside the industry. If you are employed with a fashion company, obviously they will tell you what to wear, the whole point is that you are going to sell the product they want you to sell. If you don't wish to do so, you can refuse the contract in the first place. There's nothing that she says in that video that even remotely affects only women in the industry. ... Yeah, as I said, male…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:25 PM
6

The problem is that you are inevitably going to run into the "and who set that system up?" & "patriarchy hurts men too" narratives. Exhibit A
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:14 PM
1

The problem is that you are inevitably going to run into the "and who set that system up?" & "patriarchy hurts men too" narratives. (Case in point)[https://www.np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1lajhl4/most_men_arent_privileged_they_are_just_suffering/mxlajfw/?context=3]
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:12 PM
5

Male popstars don't have to be good either. They can also be hot. But their hotness isn't used to reduce them in the same way- even if he is clearly beloved for being hot, it's still perfectly acceptable for him to wear normal clothes during presentations. In places like the Oscars, MOST people dress formally, because that's the point. It's a formal event. The people that dress provocatively do so because they WANT to, not because they are FORCED to. I want to know what type of female pop-stars …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:01 PM
11

Women are told they won't be good at math or science. And yet, women continue to succeed in math and science careers. Maybe in the 90s. Since the beginning of this century, society has now actively done whatever it takes to push more and more women into stem fields. Take accountability. Stop blaming women for some men's refusal to adapt Again. Ironic. Men's issues are personal issues because they are lazy bums. Women's issues are a sign of a troubled society, and we MUST fix them together.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:46 PM
10

That would be incorrect. It isn't. Yup, because young men refuse to have a job or training or education unless there's a promise of pussy. Like I said mamy times before in this sub. An individual's education is one of the most important building blocks of their lives and will determine a lot. When you are born in a society that actively demonizes your behavior and has a megative bias based on your gender identity, it's not a surprise that a majority of these people look at education in a negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:38 PM
13

Homelessness issues have hundreds of nonprofits. And most of those are either intandem with domestic violence shelters, meaning they tend to primarily help women or try to do 50/50 which is numerically not feasable because that means that a disproportionate amount of those funds are being used to help women, because 2 out of 3 homeless people are men, meaning women get 2x as much help as men do in this specific issue. Men's issues are taken seriously and addressed. Not really and if so, they onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:26 PM
–

I checked it out of curiousity and humor. I was like: "No way is a woman unironically calling a guy an incel for replying to one of her comments in a debate sub, right?" I was pleasantly incorrect. Also, in my experience, the women that always immediately jump into using the incel insult in this sub tend to be women that frequent autism subs. Don't know if it means something, but it's something I have seen a couple of times now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 09:44 AM
–

Last night, in this very sub, a woman called me an incel because I responded to her comments too long in a chain. Lmao, not wrong: http://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1jz0s4c/men_are_not_simple_creatures_they_have_complex/mn4yp08/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 09:36 AM
1

https://youtube.com/shorts/Wq1ajCGpt9U This you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 12:06 AM
9

Anything over 5 imo is too much imo. Maybe it's cuz I'm 28 now and my feelings might change with age, but I feel like having at least a 5 year gap puts both parties in different lifestyles and experiences already.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:09 PM
21

Yeah, even as a guy, I find those gaps creepy at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:06 PM
17

Because women can sexually satisfy themselves with toys and their own privacy, and men either can't, or think they can't. Lmao, pretty sure most men masturbate at rates far higher than women. The reason as to why women can stay off of romantic relationships is becaise they can get all the benefits of having a romantic relationship from their other groups. Friends, FWBs, the offshoot orbiter they can talk to any time they want etc. It's not cuz men don't have as many masturbatory toys lmao. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:45 PM
2

☕️
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:45 PM
0

Someone who cares about their relationship doesnt ignore This cuts both ways. She has as much responsibility as him. after the second or third she’s ‘nagged’ about the same thing. "Nagged" is passive complaining. Hence why. If it was actually a problem she should approach him just as much as he has to look out for these "nags" and pinpoint the issue. The problem often times is that women stay quiet, or just passively drop hints, hints that CAN be brushed off as just simple annoyance, and then th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 09:31 PM
2

It late. It shouldnt take blackmail for a guy to give a shit. You shouldnt be ignoring your wifes’s/girlfriend’s problems because you think you can away with it. Telling somebody else that you are having problems in the relationship is completely different from either blackmailing/ultimatum or passively letting the problem fester, specially if the other party doesn't even realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 09:02 PM
2

Any evidence of that? Without any data to compare the two time periods, it sounds a bit like a golden age fallacy. At least IMO the evidence is on the books that Tomassi and other founder members of RP published. They were in part autobiographies that spent a significant portion describing other men that were seeking to learn just like they were, and they tended to be older, well over the age of 25. The reason why I think it's harder now is because of social media. But that's again, my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:53 PM
1

dorky ≠ Autistic Obviously, hence why I included BOTH of them. If I didn't think they were different, I would have just said dorks. A significant portion of their community is on the autism spectrum. its far more than a support group for autistic men struggling with dating Never claimed otherwise, but most people that go onto describe the RP as that, tend to forget that a significant portion of their community is men are those very same things they try to demean them as.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:51 PM
4

i thought red pill was mostly touted by older guys who are divorced. trp isn't really associated that much with college students or high schoolers Yes and no. The first famous redpillers like Tomassi were yes older, but they were also dorks that struggled with dating and started publishing/categorizing what worked for people like them and what didn't. Back in the 2000s young men didn't struggle as hard as now when it comes to dating, so a majority of men that struggled with dating so much they n…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:28 PM
5

Why in the world an “immigrant” would align himself with a dorky collection of indoor nerds obsessed with white power I’ll never understand, OP literally just told you. Because if there is "white supremacism" as you call it, in it's group, it only promoted to these men AFTER they join, not before. Literally how to create a cult 101. Also, the fact that you see them as literally immigrants first and THEN men is exactly the same problem with the legt and why a substancial amount of young men, even…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:23 PM
3

Exhibit A: Myself
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:19 PM
3

Literally my previous comment was to a guy that described the redpill as a whole as dorky. Not my fault that non-redpillers other than yourself are calling them that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:10 PM
2

Calling the red pill and its community, dorky, or autistic, neurotic or insanely methodical is like fatshaming a person that is going to the gym or describing a black person as black. Like yeah, that's kinda obvious. It was made dorky men who once struged dating for dorky men who are still struggling with dating. That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:05 PM
19

Thats not the point, the point is having a 400 page manual about dating is so lame and dorky, just like TRP itself. I find it funny how non redpillers describe and belittle the red pill like this . Imagine this thought process: be man who struggles with social interactions and dating, the so-called dorks, autistics, social rejects, neurotics of the social herirarchy find community of other men like themselves, a select few individuals of this community start experimenting on things that work for…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:51 PM
3

Are you pretending that LGBT and “immigranuts/refugeees” don’t include young men? I'm an immigrant. Technically. I'm puertorican born in PR, now living in Mass. I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that the left does not particularly care about young male immigrants, it's mostly children or women that are destitute seeking asylum which they focus all of their resources on. Do they technically include them under the umbrella term "immigrant/refugee"? Yes, they are included, but in reality t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:33 PM
5

Not all women make bad decisions over and over, and the ones who do, don’t engage with them because it’s drama you don’t need, but they still have right to make the same bad decisions if that’s what they choose to do. TBF at least for most young men in general, they don't have "beef" with women who do either of those things. It's the ones that keep choosing wrong, then go on to social media/ their friends/ other men to complain how all men are like these assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:25 PM
3

Reinforcing victimhood and white supremacy isn’t concrete advice, it encourages violence. . Modern American progressivism has left young men in the dust. They're focused on promoting young women's rights and LGBT rights and immigrant/refugee rights and so many other groups. They see young men neutrally at best and outright enemies at worst. As a result, men join toxic communities because at least they're welcome there. The entire quote you tried to summarize paints a completely different picture…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:20 PM
2

Lots of things people forget about the context here: Adam was the only one TOLD by God to not eat the forbidden fruit. Adam was the "Head" of Eve (Head of Household allegory). He was the leader, not her. He should have "corrected" her mistake when he found out what she had done. When Eve was getting tempted by the serpent, she did so with Adam, fully knowing it and allowinf it to happen: “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman. “For God knows that when you eat from it your ey…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:57 AM
1

when people argue that access to sex and dates is more important than housing or employment. Tbf both of these things womem have the men beat too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 08:56 AM
4

Bullshit. You can find many examples of women talking about the same dichotomy, but in different words. The "Looking good, Susan" HR meme is a meme for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:42 AM
1

you can get promoted for all kinds of reasons. one of them being a crush, also much more reserved for significantly above average women, is hardly some unfathomable advantage. Yet you literally said how this was an advantage in the first place. That's the point. IT IS an advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 04:58 PM
1

Ah yes. Because men in managerial position have never promoted women.because they fancied them. No sir. That has NEVER happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 04:18 PM
2

Not all men. Only men in power. Again, Apex fallacy. Women only consider men that have some sort of power or attractuveness, real, the rest are either creeps or invisible to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 04:13 PM
3

Powwr would be using that to your favor. If most men hold some kind of managerial position, you can charm them and slightly tilt these men in your favor, and that's on top of the women are wonderful effect. Im not saying that these women have to sleep with these men to get them to do shot for them, but a light flirt, a warm smile? Yeah, most women take advantage of that sort of thing when it suits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:51 PM
2

“Once you become decidedly female in enrollment, fewer males and, as it turns out, fewer females find your campus attractive.” Literally says that men tend to go for colleges where there are more men, once a campus becomes female majority, less and less men enter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 02:59 PM
5

Die is just a form of expression and it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously. But nice job pivoting the conversation to a random and common manner of speech to derail the conversation. Must be that high IQ you possess.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 02:20 PM
5

Because you brought up that now since we live in a modern world, women get to demand more from men, and they either have to step up or die. Yet the darwinism that women have only seems to apply for things they find advantageous, anything where the men struggle, including things like Education seem to don't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 01:50 PM
6

Yes. Why would Education be considered important when it comes to an indivual's chances of success in a modern world? Who knows. Oh that's right, because Education determines practically everything in a person's life? You cannot be this obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 01:44 PM
6

Depending on the work, a 3 goes to a 7, or a 5 to an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 01:41 PM
5

The current Passive or sedentary educational system heavily favors women and that's not including the major bias teachers generally have in favor of women, from childhood all the way to the very top of Academia.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 01:36 PM
-5

Um this is …. It sounds honestly like direct propaganda to push society towards a state where women have less reproductive control. It’s scary How is propaganda for less reproductive rights when the OP is saying they should get themselves checked out and follow medical proffesionals? If anything, OP is sahing the opposite. So just because birth control is an overall positive for women, we should somehow dismiss all the negative side effects that could impact a woman's life because people like yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:04 PM
4

And yet both cause harm. Which is my point. But you are out there literally trying to rationalize away how one is worse than the other, because it might be two in one while the other might actually be a good thing because it ",hides" itself better.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:50 AM
5

You are so right for that. You go, girl! Slay!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:36 AM
5

The DV guy and the furtive weird guy aren't a direct equivalent because they are usually giving out the clues to their nature in different ways at different times. And usually the DV guy is neuro typical and going to be better at adapting how he communicates about his DV depending on how tolerant the particular audience generally is of it and how willing to keep his secrets. Ruling out the DV guy requires entirely different strategies. It's really quite useless comparing them. No, they aren't. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:12 AM
11

Yeah, lmao. They want vulnerability for all the sappy, easy shit. Oh, dog died in a movie, and my bf cried? <33333 Oh, he got fired, and his friend died, and he's depressed and crying? Break up immediately. Fucking loser. He got sexually assaulted when he was a child and harbored great trauma from it. Why do I feel less attacted to him now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:05 AM
5

I just don't think that's a question relevant to this topic? i mean I get it, you're desperate to either find any angle to deny the fact it's sensible to shun the furtive weird guy On the contrary. I'm simply trying to affirmate that just like it's sensible to shun the furtive man, it is also sensible to shun the DV guy. But most women would rather eat nails and justify why one is not as comparable as the other, like you are doing right now. "Well you see if you loom at the dv guy from a certain…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:54 AM
4

The third time,I ask again. Is it rational to give a chance to a guy that is one step away from a DV charge?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:27 AM
7

Asked a simple question. Is it rational to give a chance to a guy that is one step away from a dv charge? The weird furtive guys however have not accepted that their dysfunction is theirs and they are responsible for making the accommodations for those aspects of their behaviour that just freak people out. As other people pointed out, the meek and furtive men are often than not trying to accomodate for their nature. Which is why women walk all over them. They know they come of a furtive, so they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:12 AM
6

Is it entirely rational to give a guy that looks like he's one step away from a DV charge a chance then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:49 AM
8

Irrelevant, because if women truly feared men that looked like they could hurt them, then so many of them wouldn't slip on their dicks all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:46 AM
–

Going to the gym doesn't give a woman curves Weight training does tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:30 PM
–

How is it pick me when she's saying shit like: What I fail to see is why women should care at all. Why should women give up their good time to date men they aren't interested in? Why should women's sacrifice their happiness to save men? Why should I get involved with a man I'm not viscerally attracted to in order to help them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:27 PM
1

But what you are suggesting is that average can’t get women. Generally speaking no, they cannot. That’s why when dudes complain about this whole hypergamy thing, I just don’t believe it because it’s not my experience. Maybe you are being too humble with yourself, and you are higher value than you give yourself credit for.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:56 PM
1

Wouldn't it be much more productive to start with an assumption that women's mechanisms of psychosexual attraction cannot be altered whatsoever? Yes. Which is why TRP laughs at people trying to change the current dating market, because it's just impossible. The proposed solution would only happen in a fantasy world. he core proposed solution of TRP makes no sense because you can't talk your way out of brain chemistry. No, again. You are conflating two things. One, TRP as a whole, never wants or …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:53 PM
1

I don’t think I’m a top % man. But I have a corporate job that pays well, stay in good shape, and have developed good social skills through years of working on it. I don’t think that makes me top %. It’s basically just what men should be doing anyway because it gives purpose. Good, because nobody here is suggesting otherwise. You are average, and most men are average. Which is what I said. If you are in your late 20s/early 30s and are out of shape and don’t have a career, you’re not average. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:23 PM
1

The framework of the redpill yes. But I'm talking about OP's mention of what redpillers proposed as a societal solution. Which according to OP: The solution proposed is that these women settle down very early with undesirable men (because as is established, desirable men have options and men with options don't commit to women). The purpose of TRP is not to find a societal solution, or anything of that nature. The purpose of TRP is to make best use of the current dating fiasco. That's why "Enjoy …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:22 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about man? How does anything you said in this reply have ANYTHING to do with what I said. Sounds like unhinged rambling ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:17 PM
2

Baaaaased.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:35 PM
1

Oof, Bell’s palsy or Trigeminal neuralgia? I’m sorry, two people I’ve loved have suffered though that. My friend with TN pretty much lost her mind from the relentless pain, and the fact that the condition doesn’t show. TN is genuinely horrifying, for what it's worth, I would take BP any day compared to that. I feel for your friend. You aren’t the first man I’ve seen make this claim, and it’s either a confession or a projection of how men feel about unattractive women. Women have no value whatsoe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:38 AM
4

Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:22 AM
16

Crickets, huh. Every single point made by red pillers contradicts the thing they said five minutes ago. I went to sleep after getting home from work. Have a temporary condition in which half my face is paralyzed and feels like my nerves has been hit by a train and a boxer at the same time. So I take a quick nap when it feels the worst. They also assume that a man a woman is attracted to must be in the top 20%, when it simply means: the man I’m most compatible with and also want to have sex with.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 12:55 AM
8

Yeah...? If you can't attract the top percentile of men, then drop your standards a little, yeah. That should go for both men and women, but women tend to ignore that and complain about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:33 PM
1

I think its you that lacks reading comprehension, this is a completely different post, go to the relevant post if you want to discuss that one otherwise move along. Brother. I literally just said that I responded to OP as well as you. I also said that what you had here wasnt a discussion, it was just 2 people using strawmans to feel better. Lmao. Again, learn to read. Carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:31 PM
0

But that's not what TRP says. It doesn't say hey, hurt yourself because it's good. It says that you must focus on being a better version of yourself, and sometimes it might hurt, but you will be better off later. If that's the case, then literally anything that doesn't derive instant gratification would be considered masochistic epistemology.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:29 PM
-5

I did add to OP's discussion, but you both here were circlejerking each other off with strawmen. Can't really add to a strawman argument since that would defeat the entire point of a strawman. Also, no, I didn't say you lack reading comprehension because we have different views, I said you lack reading comprehension because you took my entire comment and reduced it to: So just more blaming on women or literally anyone else instead of taking accountability yourself, gotcha. Which either means you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:25 PM
-4

Considering most people can't read above 6th grade level, yet most of the world keeps running just fine. you being able to type a few sentences should not be taken as a contradiction to what I said. Esecially when part of being able to read is to comprehend the writing, aka reading comprehension, which is what you do lack according to the last time we "spoke" to one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:19 PM
0

Aren't you the dude that can't read? Did you learn how to yet or do you still just default to making strawmans and then fighting them to stroke your ego?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:08 PM
78

The solution proposed is that these women settle down very early with undesirable men (because as is established, desirable men have options and men with options don't commit to women). You are conflating undesirable men and average men. Nobody is saying that hot women should go for average men, but average women whom clearly cannot keep a top 10% man, should lower their standards a little bit and to maybe give other men in the top 20 or top 30% a chance. Again, they are undesirable men, to wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:06 PM
3

Can a women walk into a doctors office and ask for sterilisation surgery and be granted it? No. Can a man go and get a vasectomy at pretty much any age, yes. Funny you asked this. I went to my primary doctor, a young woman, and asked her if I could get sterilized, literally had the next 20 minutes telling me that I'm too young to get it and that I would regret later. The idea that only women have this problem is blown way out of proportion. Both men and women experience this when it comes to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 01:04 AM
4

You literally said "the gender that gets coddled". Women get raped and murdered by their so called protectors everyday. And more men get killed by men everyday, and men get raped by women every day, mostly children. What's your point? They get paid less THEY DON'T! Fucking hell, don't tell me you actually still believe in the gender pay gap when that shit hasnt been brought up since the 2010s after it's been debunked multiple times AND gets debunked multiple times still. they can't make their ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:50 AM
4

I NEVER SAID EVERYTHING is easier for women. Just that MOST things are easier for women in the modern world we live in. Right now, they are not held by any gender stereotypes or roles. They are not beholden to anybody else to self-sustain themselves. Mass media coddles them and tells them their farts are worth diamonds. Online dating is a joke for them, an ego stroke. Academia and the entire education system ACTIVELY promotes them and discriminates against young boys and men. Women are treated M…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:34 AM
5

There we go, the classic "just be trans bro" argument. Again if the purpose of somebody wanting to have real world privileges compared to having online priviliges, why would a man want to transition to a woman in the first place? When trans-women face just as much or often the case MORE discrimination in real life than average men do. What is this asinine argument you are trying to make? Peak ledditor speak. Again, no reading comprehension whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:26 AM
9

Lmao. Reading comprehension must be difficult for you, isn't it? I would rather be the gender that gets coddled in real life and gets criticized online than be the gender that gets held to every standard in real life and only has a select few places to vent about society's double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:10 AM
5

Welcome to the Age of Intellectualism introduced by the Far Right. Neither women nor academia are responsible for men’s blind obedience to authority, and no one but men can be blamed for gobbling up and spreading anti-education propaganda. That’s all on men, who brought this on themselves. This is what you sought rabidly, enjoy basking in the victory. Are you dumb? Or just acting? This discrimination was being introduced by the left since the 70s. What are you on about? Trump and the far right d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:41 PM
5

Dude colleges didn’t accept women until well into the 20th century. Yale and Harvard didn’t accept female students until the 70s. And now women outnumber men in colleges. Now, the schooling system has been actively disparaging and discriminating against young boys since their early childhoods. And now the top levels of Academia discriminate against men and actively pushes harmful ideas that further incentivize hurting current men for the actions of.men in the past. And now young women out earn y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 10:48 PM
8

where's the accountability from most of the men? The accountability happens in the real world. Men for the most part here, debate to vent, in the real world, very few of them would ever say everything they say here, and for good reason, they would get ostracized for having those views. Men by default are always treated like they are at fault, or at the very least that they have a sense of responsibility and accountability for what happens in their lives, even outside of their control. Cuz that's…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 10:18 PM
0

The person I replied to mentioned that women chose to stop working, i said that in these cases, the men that were working were most likely putting themselves at risk of DYING by going outside. I didn't say all women chose to not work, nor that women in jobs such as nursing werent often times even more heroic than the men. I just said that in the scenario the person chose to highlight, men were still putting themselves at risk for their families. When I read that part of the comment it read to me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:32 AM
0

Possibly, but the men were putting themselves at higher risk than the women in these scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:23 AM
0

lockdown saw more women then men sacrifice their employment to care for children. Wouldn't this also mean that men were more likely to end up sick during covid, ergo they were sacrificing their lives for the family?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:42 AM
2

If it goes bad, that's on them. And the complaining is them venting which every person is entitled to. Not when they paint an entire collection of peole by the actions of few bad apples. If women where doing the same rants they do to men online towards black pekple, or any other race the world would be in flames. Women live everyday hearing bs about women collectively and for the most part they rant about it and move on Because society actively renounces, shuts down and attack people that talk t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:49 AM
11

How attractive a man inspires doubt in a woman. "Maybe he's not creepy, maybe he's just akward." "Maybe he's not nerdy, just eccentric." Etc etc. It might not DIRECTLY inspire safety, but it does inspire them to think about the actions attractive men do in a possible new light that they might as well never would have done for an average or ugly man. That's the problem. The women already feel the meed to excuse the man's behavior before she even knows the guy. But the same doesn't happen for aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:43 AM
2

When a woman beats you at shitposting.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 10:27 AM
–

As a man for the stupid flair bot: As a man, I can’t say this matches the reality I’ve experienced (male, middle aged, northern Europe). In my world, relationships feel much more like a two-way street, where both partners contribute significantly. While I absolutely agree that men should pull their weight and not see housework or emotional labor as "helping," I also don’t see men being widely celebrated for simply meeting these standards. Mostly the complaints women have are in two ways: Dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 11:06 PM
–

A man will be praised for “babysitting” his own kids. As long as it's not outside you mean. Try going into a playground full of mothers and children. I used to get mean looks when I picked up my 8 year old cousin from a public playground, and I was 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:43 PM
1

Most women here are in their LATE tirties. Not early tirties. And again, I posted that same pic. The effects of trends are not instant. Tinder while popular did not shift dating culture until well after it became popular. Just like FB did the same. Like Smartphones did. Like Phones did. Like telegrams did. Etc. The effects of inventions are not INSTANT, they still require years after they become mainstream to see the long term effects they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:06 PM
1

You see it RISING but not mainstream. Literally what I said. And it's it such a coincidence that it rose steadily as these apps became more ingraded in dating culture? Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:02 PM
1

Redpill wasnt popular in the 2011s lmao. It became mainstream literally during the Covid days. Before that it was a fringe online forum/community. PUA was more mainstream than redpill and PUA was ANOTHER fringe online comunity. PUA google trend PUA in 2010 redpill redpill in 2011
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:40 PM
1

Tinder existed 10 years ago, but the dating culture did not change until a year or so before covid. Datibg culture essentially shifted not with Tinder but when Tiktok/IG became mainstream and both hyper-pornified their apps. That's why redpill became popular after.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:35 PM
0

Most men here are younger, like in their 20s most, single, never married. Most women here are in their 30s, married. Almost a 10 year difference which is enough for women and men here to have different dating experiences compared to their opposite gender. It's not a wonder why men here appear to "hate" women. Unlike the majority of women in this sub, men here grew up with the internet 24/7 with tinder a button a way, their competition is alot harsher than the competition that the husbands of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:50 PM
4

And why would that hurt me? Am I not human? You are moving goalposts You asked WHY would they do that. I gave you the most obvious answer. Because they want to hurt you Sure it's not supposed to happen, bur if it wasn't an effective tactic, women wouldn’t do that, or hell PEOPLE wouldn't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:44 PM
8

Another thread, another young dude that knows nothing, speaks from either ignorance, privilege or both and then thinks calling the less fortunate to suck it up is somehow gonna change their mindset. A conversation on Insta where dudes didn't want to open up to their girlfriends because they'd "hold It against them". Which first off, why would they do that? Because at the time where they bring it up against you, they do it to hurt you? To emasculate you? Like huh? Which first off, why would they …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 02:07 AM
6

That doesn't mean there isn't male sexualixation in media. Hugh Jackman was literally sexually harassed during the set of X-Men's Origins: Wolverine when he was supposed to do the pool of adamantium scene by all the women in the staff. Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Robbert Pattinson, Zac Efron, etc. all have talked about the abuse of steroids to keep their unnatural unattainable physiques that hollywood wants to promote because that's their ideal beauty standard. How about every highschool-colle…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 02:37 PM
3

But that’s not something your gonna know until you’ve dated them for a while Which is why I said it's funny how older women just tell younger women to not date old men, as if there was an epidemic of old attractive men swaying young women left and right. Instead of telling young women the TRUE red flags they should look out for, they go for the glaringly obvious, as if young women already don't date old men to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:33 PM
5

Lack of commitment, emotional or sexual coercion, guard mating, violent tendencies, lack of manners, lack of basic hygiene (and no, it's not the creep/incel types that struggle with hygene that women go for, it's the attractive guys that refuse to wipe their own ass) lack of attentiveness, etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:26 PM
3

Men “women need to pick better and take responsibility for their dating choices” Women “your right, we’ll avoid obvious red flags snd help earn younger women spot them, ie single men 35+ that go fir teenagers” Not disagreeing on the premise, but it's kind of funny how the majority of the red flags women tend to ignore have nothing to do with age, since most women date around their age anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:16 PM
11

How exactly does a girl/girl relationship function? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4E8qEDi_xg According to a couple of bi women I know, this video sums it up at least for the initial dating stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 08:33 PM
8

with the Rangers Always knew those park rangers were gay. They be fucking all over them woods letting bears watch them play. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 08:29 PM
14

The implication that the guy is already attractive to begin with. They deny the idea that most women filter 80% of men in a day to day basis due to them not being attractive even when they actively admit so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:59 AM
30

You have women here actively deny that very same argument at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:37 AM
20

Reminder that right after "MeToo" trend solidified itself in the workplace, men in managerial roles and other higher positions took a step back, stopped mentoring women altogether, and became more concious of the way they acted around their female peers. The results? Women crying that they were being treated coldly and professionally, and how it now it was harder to get into the good graces of their bosses to get promotions due to them actively creating boundaries in the workplace. You know, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:35 AM
26

Casual reminder that the foreveralonewomen sub was privated after there was an influx of men WANTING to date them and flodding their dms. The bar is not below hell. It's non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:29 AM
12

They also don't deem hating on unattractive men or social rejects as cruelty, tho. That's why they ARE cruel to them, despite the obvious. Same reason children/teens do the same to their peers. They deem themselves as the just while the undersirables are well... deserving of said treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:26 AM
-7

The degree to which the woman is attracted to the man depends a lot on how attracted he is to her, and how much he shows that. But again, this is simply taking into account ONE part of attraction. Not the whole. You dismiss the entire onus of them being attracted to them in the first place, men actually being physically attractive. Personality, and ergo, how this man is somehow committed to her, comes secondary. men's "most ideal" tends to be the hottest girl he could get, whereas women's ideal …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:34 AM
2

A large part of what women find attractive in men is reflective: once a man is above her minimum threshold for attractiveness Men, on the other hand, will continue to be the sight-driven creatures they are, and arguably his attraction to her will be more fickle This contradicts what studies have already shown. Men have more varied preferences and have more range than women when it comes to what they find appealing. You can't say that women's standards are reflective AFTER they already self-selec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:14 AM
1

Nah, like Jerking off to other women you know in real life while being in a relationship is straight up wrong. Brief sets of lusts while glancing at a passing attractive woman? Sure, I can understand that, but taking it to your spankbank while already having another woman in your life? Hell nah. Gross and insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:20 PM
1

1.If men are actively touching themselves while thinking of women that they know IRL while being a relationship, that is disgusting behavior. Straight up. Like I said before, the difference, at least evem with your disgusting example, the men aren't ACTIVELY rethinking their relationship to be with these other more attractive women in their lives, but OP is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:35 AM
2

The difference between the two, however, is that the men aren't actively pursuing or letting themselves be in a position to be purused by these women that they are attracted to. The woman in that post has already actively developed a crush on the guy, so much so that she is subtly questioning her relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:31 AM
3

She doesn't just feel flattered. She has already developed a crush on him. That's what the "shamefully" part of her post implies, hence why the majority of the commenters are rightfully calling her out and calling her a potential cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:27 AM
1

Somebody post the statistic that showed that most women here are older, AKA 30s and married, while most of the men are genrally in their 20s and single.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:25 AM
5

I don't think all women have these expectations broadly. If they did, I wouldn't keep seeing younger couples with a bigger/skinnier/out of shape man in them. For every 1 couple you see with this dynamic, there's like 10 of the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:20 AM
4

Don't threaten them with a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:18 AM
4

Tbf, there are a lot of things that a lot of people do, which are illogical due to statistics yet still do them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:13 AM
6

That said, it does seem like more women gathered food, and more men hunted, but the majority of the caloric intake came from what was gathered than hunted. I mean, considering that the way we supposedly first hunted was just to chase animals around at a reasonable pace for hours until the animal collapses, this doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Everybody running with a handful of trail mix while hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:09 AM
6

I just think past a certain age, all adults are responsible for themselves. Obviously, but the problem starts during the formative years of a man's life. As an example, all adults are responsible for themselves to get out of poverty, but this thought process cannot sweep away all the factors that cause poverty in the first place. Single motherhood, living in poverty, drugs, lack of education etc. All of these are factors that we KNOW that statistically speaking, breed more poverty if the individ…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 02:02 AM
14

hey read traits that women say they like in men and then act shocked that these things do not create sexual attraction. They reeee and seethe that women "lied" to them because him being a thoughtful, creative, and educated man did not make her want to fuck. Well, isn't that obvious? Wanting a man who is attractive will always be implied. TBF the problem is that 2000s society and popular culture has promoted the idea of virtues over physicality. That everybody is "enough" just as they are. So it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:44 AM
21

Considering that's what most people do when they encounter a homeless man, then yeah. It shouldn't be that way but unfortunately, it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:45 AM
3

Of course not, because you as a woman can just act approachable and make the guy do the first move. You don't have to expect reciprocation if you are the one reciprocating in the first place. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 10:37 PM
2

If women being less kind toward men in general out of the interest of their own safety and peace of mind, provokes those men to act even worse Jesus, the lack of reading comprehension is astounding. You are def just being obtuse on purpose. Look at my argument: Except this has nothing to do with TRP, tho. OP said that there's no reason for women to act nice to men, because this "invites" men to try to pursue a relationship with them that the women don't want, therefore it's in a woman's best int…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 01:19 AM
11

Spoken like a person trying to change the subject. You snuck that in your argument, as a side remark towards men, I took that side remark, and put it face first against your arguments. I didn't change the subject one bit. I literally used it to show how biased you are against men, and how men are not as utilitarian as you believe they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 01:03 AM
0

What I'm reading in that quote is that she's being told by other people, primarily other men, that men can and will misunderstand generic kindness and flirtation, and try to escalate it beyond what it is to the point that it's violating boundaries. Again, better to protect yourself from that than be worried if you're "repelling" normal men. Especially if said "normal" men are going to act pushy and annoying, as told by other men, or in the experience of countless other women. It's like you are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 01:00 AM
2

Guys don't typically get repelled for being normal and not acting strange or harassing people. Unless you define being "repelled" as a woman not giving you more than a baseline of respect and human decency Look at what she said: If I was taught that men see being nice as flirtation and try taking advantage of my kindness, you bet your ass I’d be mean as hell towards men around me. Henceforth, yes, it literally is repelling normal men. Did you read the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 12:50 AM
6

. The fact that people conflate going out of your way for someone as a purely romantic investment is part of the problem, but I don't entirely blame men for this. Again the issue is when the woman keeps wanting for more time investment from the guy. It's fine when it's a one off, but often time the confusion, at least when it comes to male-woman friendships is that women think the man's time is not as important as hers. Because she keeps asking and asking, taking and taking, and for her there's …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 12:07 AM
37

One of those examples of men who cause their own problems and “You can't whine about women choosing the bear when you glorify shitty behavior as male behavior”. But honestly, I think the main problem is too many men don't like people and are only nice to people they can use. Spoken like a true woman, I suppose. Most male to male friendships are egalitarian, they don't actively try to use the other, but do occasionally offer their services if the other friends need it. Because we all know that: A…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 09:53 PM
3

Men behave differently around women they are romantically interested in. If he doesn’t act like an asshole when he’s around her ever how should she just know he is? I'm gonna be completely honest and say that MOST OF THE TIMES the asshole men are GENERALLY assholes in most major daily interactions. Wether that's from lack of manners, to willful ignorance, to mate guarding, to having to always be the most alpha bro in the room. Hence why it's so easy for us men to tell them apart. They CANT HELP …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:30 PM
2

We can say this, but at the end of the day it's a clear pattern. Or at least the source of frustration for young men is noticing the pattern. Did you date an asshole once? It happens. You dated an asshole twice? Sure, it's still possible. You dated an asshole, three, four, five times? That's a pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:24 PM
1

This sub is to DEBATE the current dating world and the current interpersonal relationships between the genders. By nature of the sub, it gets messy. You actual moron. Like, holy christ. No wonder I saw another post of yours like two weeks ago about the patriarchy and you claiming to studying to be a lawyer. It all makes perfect sense to me, an aspiring lawyer, that is ignorant and horrible at debating. You'll fit right in, with about half of the lawyer rejects that have no jobs in this country.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 12:01 AM
4

Again, how ironic. You go on here, you explicitly make a post claiming that both sides of the mainstream pills make up generalizations, I guess to get upvotes or something idk, vanity maybe. Somebody tells you exactly what's the problem with this sub, which is that very few people have actually read or understand the red pill "dogma." the majority of these, are the women of this sub, then go on to make up their own version of TRP as a strawman and fight that and criticize that instead. You then …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:51 PM
4

Just because you read a snippet of the books doesn't give you even the smallest amount of authority to then claim that the world it paints is so bleak that everybody that lives like it, is miserable. Read. The. Book. Before you form opinions of the subject. You asked where could you learn what the red pill originally was. I gave you a straight answer. Now you can either go on to read the book if you truly wish to learn what TRP is, or you can continue to make up a strawman of the ideology while …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:38 PM
5

Well... yeah? TRP is at the base of it all more cynical than the standard BP. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:26 PM
3

Read The Rational Male. Should give you a pretty standard baseline of what the red pill was founded on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:14 PM
3

Okay, but maybe AF/BB is also just what people accuse women of doing while they see that they did the same as OP? Considering the majority of times this is applied is when they themselves (the women) admit or more exactly HAVE to specify that the guy they are currently with are NOT as physically attractive/taller/manlier/lust inducing as her other past partners, the answer is no. It's not the same. That is what I said. There's a huge difference between "hoeing around" guy or girl then finding an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:42 PM
2

Oh we are at “no you phase”? I mean, what else can I even do? Told you about my life and how RP worked. You said "Nuh uh it actually hurt you" reply no, and gave detailed ways it helped better my life and you still reply with the same verbatim argument, leaves nothing for me to debate you about. Like you where the one that has always replied with childish arguments with nothing to back them up. No coherence or even an actual argument with substance for me to either learn from,or to debate it. Li…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:23 PM
2

I'm sure somebody that names themselves after working out and has a specific alt for only a single subreddit because he's too chicken shit and scared of people finding out who he really is, and then goes around calling other people larpers is definitely NOT projecting. No sir. The only real larper here is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:12 PM
2

Any real RP understand Blue is just an expression and not a real thing. There is not blue pill. Blue Pill is the standard dating dogma. The crabs in the bucket mentality. Etc etc. Again, you do not know what the fuck you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:08 PM
2

That’s a lot of words to say RP fucked your up more than it helped. No, because without it I would have been even more overweight, alone, bitter and resentful to women. I would have been the stereotypical incel. But you got laid tho. So? It's not about just getting laid tho. TRP teaches you that you should always strive to better yourself. Self-improvement is not something you can do, but MUST do, always be better. Did it help me get laid? Yes it did. Did it get me bitter as well? Yes, like I sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:04 PM
3

So the RP taught you to do what your gym teacher had been saying since HS? My Gym teacher was a guy that got married to a domineering woman who strang him along like a puppy. He had no balls to speak off and only appeared to act tough in front of children. But I get what you are trying to say, the answer is that while some would say yes, I was raised and taught to believe that personality came first. I had numerous women who were friends to me at the time continuously support me by saying all of…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 03:50 PM
3

I did practice you moron. I tried. I took the BP gulp and drowned myself with it. "I'm perfect just the way I am" "I just need to find that special special someone" "She will come when the time is right" Etc etc. As I was nearing 300 pounds while trying to be the nices guy known to man. It. Did. Not. Work. And I didn't ruin my chances with RP. Are you actually stupid, or are you roleplaying as one? All of my relationships ended cordially with no drama behind them. The last GF I had, I ended the …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:59 PM
3

RP told me why I was being barred from entry to the dating market and how to fix it. And it did. What I did after wether good or bad is my own fault. That's on me, not the world. Which is what at it's core is RP. To take responsibility of my own self and improve it. Congrats. You now get the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:52 PM
3

Again. I was a dude with no exp in HS and early college. I became depressed out of it and became overweight. I found TRP while in that dark place. I read the required reading list and applied it. Lost the weight I gained and started to get dates, two gfs and a couple of FWBs during the rest of my college years, It works if you read the required books and apply what they said. That's all. It worked for me. If it did, it can work on pretty much any other guy. Not sure where you got the idea said t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:44 PM
2

You need to learn from experience The stupidity in this argument is astounding. We are talking about that have TRIED and GOT NONE. You genius. They have tried and gotten no experience whatsoever. They CAMET EVEN GET EXP. THAT'S THE POINT. That's why they asked people THAT DID have experience. That's how redpill came to be. And the bitter dudes came to the RP because they wanted to feel “special” cause they found “the secret” Yeah, bro. It's def a secret to work out, become attractive and then sl…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:14 PM
3

On this sub, most posts from red pill guys can be summarized as “women bad More like: "The majority of problems with the current dating scene stems from women because they hold the majority of control when it comes to dating in general." Women arent bad cuz women bad. Women bad cuz they shit at dating and seeking out stable partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:07 PM
1

Lmao yep. Nowhere in the original comment's wording did he either directly state or imply that the girl he married is less attraxtive than the string of Fwbs or ONSs he had. He didn't settle for anything. He didn't say how this woman was less attractive in his eyes or in the eyes of society "but still loves her more" than the rest of women he at one point had. AF/BB is when people actively seek out people they 100% would not have even given a chance when they were younger, but now do JUST becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:00 PM
5

If your moronic ass actually read. At least two of those sources are from 2023.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:45 PM
–

Hey genius. I'm editing as I find new sources. Literally up to 5 right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:43 PM
–

https://ifstudies.org/blog/number-3-in-2023-theres-no-huge-gender-gap-in-being-single-among-young-adults https://news.iu.edu/live/news/26924-nearly-1-in-3-young-men-in-the-us-report-having-no https://ifstudies.org/blog/1-in-3-a-record-share-of-young-adults-will-never-marry https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-state-of-our-unions/202302/why-are-so-many-young-men-sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:39 PM
–

There's a minority and then there's like 1/3 of young men. Numbers matter. Approximately 1/3 of men havent had any relationships, that is STATISTICALLY significant and it will 100% breed future problems as that generation becomes the main workers in our society. Concern is verh much warranted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:37 PM
2

You need to be able to see what other men are doing right to see what you are doing wrong, genius. Why do you think these bitter men came to know redpill? Because they seeked to find a place that would tell me wtf is wrong with them, then men worse than them are getting women, and they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:29 PM
4

That's the blue pill dichotomy in a nutshell. Hence why the majority of women here don't know what they are talking about. The TRP had the "essentials" reading list on their main description There, in that reading list was The Rational Male, which was practically the TRP bible. Up there it EXPLICITLY STATED that if you were reading this book you were most likely a man who had an ugly, unkempt and chubby at best physical appearance and the first thing you should do while reading the book is to go…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:04 AM
3

By the time they hit adulthood, many women have had a bad experience with a short guy with Napoleon complex, and the general theme of it is "never again." It's not like children and teens are often cruel to their less fortunate peers, amirite? Napoleon complexes don't just magically spontaneously happen. They are constantly reinforced in their childhoods well into their early adulthoods. I don't have a napoleon complex, but i was close to getting one. During most of my middle school and high sch…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:24 AM
1

looks at my closet filled with black shirts and pants Of course! I'm not ugly! I'm just wearing black! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:07 AM
1

Brutal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:03 AM
1

They both said attracted to, not love at first sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:02 AM
0

I was being snarky to the idea that "loser" (as in poverty wise) should be steered away from because poverty itself does horrible consequences to everybody around them. But I guess that's my own fault from inserting my biases. You meant it in a gender less way, not specifically to "loser" men. Right? If that's the case, I apologize. Also, i don't know about you, nor your current living situation but I don't think leaving your children to their father to only take care of to be good either. But t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:35 AM
0

Good thing the single most important factor that determines the likelihood of a child growing up and continuing to be in poverty into their adulthood, more likely to have temperamental issues and is more likely to do crime is single motherhood. I mean, clearly those women are statistically protecting their children from poverty, crime and lack of social decency by steering away from loser men. Imagine being poor together with a stable man. Ew Phew Women really do dodge bullets all the time /s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:21 AM
1

He's using single mothers as an example of his hypothesis. Which is that there is a large percentage of women, that despite having little to no dating success, keep raising their standards, as an example he brought up single women which are the quintessential definition of: "I fucked up badly by choosing an objectively terrible man to have children with. So now I will only look for the best demigod greek of a man, despite him being a myth that will never come." mentality At least by popular sent…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:16 AM
2

It's so funny to me how men simultaneously hate on single mothers while they beg them to lower their standards so they can be picked Tbf I wasn't talking about single mothers, just young women in general. At least in the mid 20s which is my age group, and I don't know what kinda markers you are huffing but single mothers, even young single mothers are not sought-after in droves by men, even men my age that have have their standards lower than the floor that they stand on. Most men steer away fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:58 PM
4

The problem is that the way she raises her standards is by expecting the other men to be fine with her being more selfish not about inproving herself and be able to deduce what the other guy really wants. Yeah. The problem is not why they do it, but rather how they go about it. They raise standards that primarily frustrate the "good" men in an quantifiable way. It's not the: "I want to take it slow. Because I have been hurt in the past." reasoning, it's how they apply it by saying: "We will have…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:14 PM
9

Would you agree that most men and women know this is a violation of boundaries, even if it’s a boundary not explicitly drawn in a relationship? I don't see why not. As a young man barely in his mid 20s I absolutely despise the idea that everything now has to be either labeled or explicitly stated otherwise anything else goes. I hate the concept of "situationships" and "Well yes we went on 6 dates but like we never said we should be exclusive." mentality that people nowaday have. The concept of d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:19 PM
11

That's ice cold ngl. Like sure, it's one way to gain exp fast and easy, but cold nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:25 PM
1

Well it's an argument of semantjcs tho. Either women collectively lower their physical standards as they get older and therefore most men have a chance at that age or men collectively get status and therefore become more attractive. Frankly i think it's both. But yes, the majority of men do still enter relationships when they go into the late 20s and 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:20 PM
2

Isn't this just the classic "but was she wearing slutty clothes" argument that we all collectively agreed that it was trash?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:08 PM
4

Most voters are women, by defacto they already have the most political and economic power, that's why they are also the biggest spenders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:06 PM
-4

Tbf buman rights while yes should be universal, they are, at the end of it all, privileges. If tomorrow Russia invaded and won a war against the U.S. and implemented their own laws, women nor even men wouldn’t magically keep all their rights the had from the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:04 PM
–

Men back then voted for those ammendments you dimwit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:01 PM
3

Cheating is definitely domestic abuse. Shows a pattern of abuse, not actually abuse tho. cheating became normalized Cheating became normalized back in the stone ages. No clue what you mean by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:16 PM
-1

The fact that men aren’t a hive mind doesn’t take away from the fact that it was people born with penises who came up with the system to oppress women. ??? Nobody came up with a system to oppress women, it unfortunately came NATURALLY because of our evolution both as a species and societal. Just because we are now more advanced to realize that society had to change and women were equal to men,does not make men inherently sexist or wanting a system that shits on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:14 PM
10

They usually won’t kick the woman out of bed, but many immature men will still sleep with women who have these “flaws” and then talk crap about her later. Most men don't even talk about the actual events the sex they have with their friends. These men are rare, especially when you compare how casual it is for women to talk about their sex lives with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:10 PM
2

Because one is a real possibility for any woman, the other, it's for a selected few. I can agree in a sense that both sexes are hypergamous, but the idea that most men are just LOOKING and WANTING to jump the shark is frankly not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:05 PM
4

Uh no??? I'm sorry but this is just insane. It's just is, most attractive men are no different from your average or ugly men when it comes to how they act outside. Some are more charismatic yes, the majority however coast through life with their looks giving them an advantage. I've seen women see a man just WALK into a place and already swoon or quickly make themselves appear available in the hopes he approaches them. Not a single signal, not a single behavior analyzed, not a single "spark" that…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:02 PM
2

If he is old and wealthy, then he isn’t. Most old men are not wealthy. But most old men are not dating or marrying 20 year olds... Hence the only old men that are dating the 20 year olds tend to be wealthy and/or of higher status than the woman, hence not hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:53 PM
3

And what I’m saying is that women need more than looks to feel active attraction. How so? I've seen women approach and flirt with tall handsome men that they have never seen before nor have seen him act. Doesn't that go against that notion? If women need more than looks to feel active attraction then why does it seem that the ONLY become active participants in the dating game when a tall handsome man is in their vicinity? Also this: This arousing “spark ✨” I’m alluding to is usually a behavioral…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:49 PM
28

Note sure what, here's the study: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 09:13 PM
5

So let me get your argument. You said that i used the term "picked a fight" and not "confront." I then reiterated that NOT ONLY did I DID USE THE TERM CONFRONT, but I ALSO MEANT it to be used interchangeably with the term "picked a fight". And then you clap back by pointing out that i also said "picked a fight"? Are you genuinely this dumb? Yes. I did say, "Picked a fight." i also said, "confront," and yes, I used both terms interchangeably SINCE THAT IT'S ONE OF THE MAIN DEFINITIONS OF THE WORD…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 08:45 PM
7

Uh, you said "pick a fight." Again, fucking ledditors you only lightly read comments before responding. ☝️🤓 lookking asses Let's see what I said: When women confront men in public... So when women confront men in public, ... However, when men confront other men in public... So men are more hesitant to straight up confront... Why yes, I'm using the word confront to mean pick a fight. Since its MAIN DEFINITION is to oppose somebody else with an argumentative or HOSTILE INTENT. Great, thank you for…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 08:30 PM
5

That's a really strange way to say she tried to stop a man who was threatening a woman. Confront verb meet (someone) face to face with hostile or argumentative intent. (of a problem, difficulty, etc.) present itself to (someone) so that dealing with it cannot be avoided. face up to and deal with (a problem or difficult situation). It's not strange at all that's the fucking point. It's strange for, and I'm sorry for putting it this way, retards that believe that their lives won't be ended in a sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 08:18 PM
12

He didn't leave her, tho. She went off and picked a fight she KNEW she wouldn’t win. She then expected to be rescued by her BF. You can tell exactly that most women there have never been in a physical fight, let alone as a man fighting another random man in public. When women confront men in public, even if they use physical force, the same "patriarchy" that they so deeply hate, protects them because even the most subhuman male that lives in western society is taught either by society itself or …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 07:59 PM
5

https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1hf2fx5/_/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 07:42 PM
10

Like the popular post where a girl got the "ick" because her BF did not try to confront/attack a man out in public? That post was seething with misandrists and toxic views.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 07:36 PM
2

"A story that is supposed to be heading on a world ending cataclysmic actions. The stakes have never been higher. The tension has never been higher. This franchise is DARK AF and this trailer was the fucking opposite of all of that." "It was a hero shooter trailer masked as an RPG game. That's why it was recieved so horribly." The comments showed exactly that. But obviously, you do not care about the truth: "Its just whining about the trailer wasnt up to their liking for no reason." Yep, a total…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:49 PM
5

Look at the top comments. All crticizing exactly what I said: Here's a thread made by a sub composed entirely of only women gamers talking about the reveal: Would you look at that same criticisms https://np.reddit.com/r/GirlGamers/comments/1dbznnj/dragon_age_the_veilguard_official_reveal_trailer/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button How about a general gamers thread: https://np.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1dbyrfd/dragon_age_the_veilguard_offic…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:25 PM
11

Where did the devs DA4 was a conclusion. You mean other than the conclusion of every single plot thread that was established in early games? Oh right i'm talking to lillith. Bad faith arguments is her bread and butter. Let's asume that the devs did not intent to actually end the every single plot thread in the series in Veilguard. Let's assume that. The fans, still expected the game to do so. Not only did they expect the game to do so, but they expected the game to become way more dark than it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:07 PM
6

The only thing that irked me about the witcher trailer was Ciri now being able to use witcher signs and potions. Implying she underwent the ritual. The same ritual that Geralt refused to let her go through cuz it was guaranteed to kill women by default, and even men had to undergoe the process as children to even stand a chance of surviving, Ciri was too old when Geralt first met her to go through the process. Yet now it's seemingly fine for an even older Ciri to go through the process? Keep in …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:29 PM
11

(Repost cuz automod cried) Now, they hate diversity and LGBT people with this backlash. They wanted this game to fail as soon as they saw this trailer. What’s wrong with this trailer? It doesn’t have a human white male character. Thats it. Okay now I know that you are talking straight out of your ass. The reason why the trailer was so bad and why the subsequent game was worse was because this game was supposed to be conclusion of a 15 year story. A story that is supposed to be heading on a world…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:24 PM
1

Oh, i geniunely did not read who had posted this post. Fuck me, How dumb I was. Of course it's fucking Lillith. Should have known it was the biggest troll in the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:13 PM
–

Now, they hate diversity and LGBT people with this backlash. They wanted this game to fail as soon as they saw this trailer. What’s wrong with this trailer? It doesn’t have a human white male character. Thats it. Okay now I know that you are talking straight out of your ass. The reason why the trailer was so bad and why the subsequent game was worse was because this game was supposed to be conclusion of a 15 year story. A story that is supposed to be heading on a world ending cataclysmic actions…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:08 PM
–

AI relationships will be a disaster. I'm sure some people can lie to themselves and make it feel real but an AI bf/gf doesn't choose you. If it would have been the past me, the same overweight loner guy I was back in college, if I had an AI girlfriend I'd probably end my life soon after. It might feel good at first but eventually you will reach a state of apathy and then depression. I'd look at it like Bladerunner 2049. Sure at first Officer K (Ryan Gosling's character) a replicant, still feels …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:07 PM
–

Ive asked them if they watched those videos because they wish they had a girlfriend, and they all went silent. Yeah probably because connecting both topics is practically insane. I would just shut up and ignore the questions if somebody came to me and proposed a similar line of questions out of left field, I'd probably call you weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:03 PM
3

Except dread game as far as it's commonly understood do not set up ultimatums, at least not at first. It's simply a way for men to set up boundaries to protect themselves and avoid more interpersonal conflict. One of the main things about dread game is to stop actively engaging in arguments with the woman you are with as they will most likely lead nowhere, make you frustrated that your feelings are not being even considered and further conflict will only lead you to be either desperate or suffoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:38 PM
4

It maybe hasn't risen but the gap is still the problem no? Like mathematically speaking, how can both genders have different variations of singleness along the the same age groups of at least 8% if there isn’t a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 06:42 PM
1

Why don’t men do more introspection and take accountability of their lives and fulfillment? Women were spoon-fed all the fairytales of being a wife and motherhood and we’re starting to shed that. Because as a society, we are still beholding men to that ideal... The same reason why now women are starting to shed that... turns out when a society constantly promotes an idea, people follow. Also helps that the indutrial revolution meant that women could do all types of jobs thanks to machines that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 11:48 PM
–

It's not for combating misogyny tho. It's about avoiding men sexually for safety. Which is already a thing? I just don't get it. just "i don't feel safe having sex with men bc i could get pregnant and not get healthcare if it's needed" My heart goes out to those women that do miscarriage and can't get standard medical care because it would be considered abortion, but the idea that now all of a sudden women are hyper aware that they can get pregnant and there are consequences for it is just well.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 11:29 PM
18

Well you see, we don't count. And if we do, it's lesser.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:29 PM
4

I don't disagree that some men do hide their nature out when dating, specially nowadays, but I find it jarring to believe that a majority fo what people call "fuckbois" are anything BUT the most blatantly down bad men that try to shoot their shot with anythjng that slightly moves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 12:31 AM
16

Sigh... Red Piller here I highly doubt the majority of RP men even care that much about women being feminists. Most RP men want their women to have a job, be self-sufficient just like them. Personally, i dont give a fuck, all of my girlfriends were people I disagreed with them on numerous political issues, I just didn’t let that stand in the way of loving and apreciating them. One of the main things I look for in a partner is then having the ability to debate a topic with me, without resolting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 10:44 PM
1

Because Trump is not putting it on commercials and saying "hey you army retards, yalll are shit, vote for me if you don't wanna."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:13 PM
5

Yeah. Most men either don't care based on principle alone (she's free to do what she wants who cares) or won't feel the impact anyways. Like, sure, women plan to collectively stop having sex with men... to defend reproductive rights... thereby substantialy lowering the chances that the same women get pregnant and most likely are at least positive towards getting an abortion... So Trump and conservatives are literally winning by double whammy. They literally just stopped liberal women from having…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:54 PM
2

Because they are saying in the most literal sense that you can be the best "high quality, attractive man" and still can't get dates because you are not frothing at the mouth and championing Harris lmao. https://youtu.be/rTUjqqZ7WLw This comes off after Obama was shaming black men for not wanting to vote for Harris lmao. https://youtu.be/QVD17hg4O7o
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:48 PM
2

How is it disrespectful and belittling? Beer ads use this same exact narrative all the time. Because the difference is that a beer ad just wants to fucking sell you neer and Harris was trying to shame liberal men into voting for her and subsequently agree with her values. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:43 PM
1

Have you ever thought to unpack why random women need to constantly cominucate to the outside world on who they fuck? Like keep that to yourselves, Gdamn.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:32 PM
2

Um no, the first time Trump was elected a big portjon of the country activeky opposed the radical ideas of the left. They did not care that much about Trump's policies. This time Trump's voting base remained the same and the democrats didn’t show up. For as much as dems like to talk and talk, they do a shit job representing where it matters. Well i guess it's not different from wokes online.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 12:50 AM
1

the endgame just trying to be miserable and making women miserable....how does one even get to that point? You get to that point when you realize that nothing you can do will change the outcome, so if an incel cant ever get a date nor have a good social life then the only thing he has is hate otherwise the rope will call him.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 12:47 AM
1

I think you mean dread game? Which is just the strategy of taking a step back and engage in other activities rather than keep giving your partner attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 10:45 PM
8

What's funny is that a large portion of them that aren't explicitly made for a specific degree/field are mostly aimed at gay men. So it's not men, just gay folk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:25 PM
2

Good. Lost 150 pounds, still retained my leg mass (so don't have to do leg day as much haha) dated a while became a lot more assertive. Now I kinda went into monk mode for a couple of years and just focused on myself/career.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:57 AM
9

Remember how MeToo was under way there was a period where there were countless business-related articles on how for the last year or so, women were finding it really hard to get mentorships and one-on-one meetings with their bosses? How now their bosses were treating women "coldly and very professionaly" instead of the "warm and buddy-buddy" ways these bosses talked to their male subordinates Pepperidge farm remembers... https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMms1805743 https://www.nytimes.com…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:57 AM
3

Last straw when I was still in my first year in college after trying to date and failing miserably as a fat "shy" guy, was when I asked a couple of women I was friends with what could I do. "Just be yourself." Instead of gaining the artificial confidence that had always appeared after I heard that statement, I remember saying to myself: "Why would I be myself if I suck? Why would anybody want me if I'm ugly fat and lack confidence?" A week later, I was reading The rational male and starting to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:53 AM
3

"Be not afraid!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:49 AM
6

Men have a far larger preference net. Even here. In fact even when a post is talking about fat women, there's literally always a top comment saying something like "I dig fat women" or "I love fat women."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:44 AM
4

Uh yeah? Creeped out as well. My cousin's kid is this handsome dude who looks way older than he is. He looks like 18-19, but he's 15, he's always been treated better compared to my childhood so I try to hang out with him from time to time to see what's like on the other side of the fence. A year ago, he wanted to buy some ice cream, so I drove him to the local supermarket and told him to get the ice cream while I was looking for some sour candy. He comes back on the verge of crying because a cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:36 AM
2

“Red pill” guys are pretty harsh on fat women but not fat men. You mean other than telling each fat guy that he should stop being a fucking slob and start going to the gym?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:19 AM
13

Mental health isn't perceived as real. Young men struggling with mental health are viewed as extra-contemptible because a) rigid masculinity; b) the horrors of the past century didn't happen to you; what do you have to complain about? I fail to see the difference with North American men. Mental health may be "socially acceptable," but it's still heavily stigmatized, especially in dating when it comes to men. My psych told me that it was a normal occurrence that many women lose interest when men …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 09:52 PM
1

Men are just as entitled as women and don't notice anyone who's not a Stacy. So many deluded fat schlubby men are trying to go for women way out of their league. I've literally am living proof that women, specifically fat women, curve fat men wdym? I tried dating fat women when I was fat. They did not want a fat guy. I hung out with the stem fem group for an entire Uni school year. They literally curved men on their league and treated them like shit when they tried to approach. Ugly and fat wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:00 AM
1

Big examples: Ooh gonna be fun dissecting this. (1. Mindy Kahling) You mean the woman that constantly harps against specifically "white men" in every single rant she does online. The same woman that helped create Velma, a show where they remove everything beloved and wholesome about scooby-doo only to lazily race swap characters, make Daphne a lesbian that is into Mandy Kaling's self insert Velma? The same woman that DECIDED to have children by invitro and CHOSE a white male's sperm for her chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:35 PM
2

She isn't complaining that all men have flaws, she's complaining that the men she meets all happened to have deal breakers for her. . For instance, the last guy I met on a dating app, looked like a model, super kind and smart. But in person, something about his face bothered me, I couldn't say what it waa. Got an ick despite looking like a model. Can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:59 PM
17

Read a thread on trueoffmychest where a woman posted that her little brother had killed himself because he felt inadequate and alone after struggling with dating. He called himself ugly in his final note. The sister is understandably upset at the situation yet can not comprehend what he meant by the lack dating success. She described him as a good young man that wad already a good role father figure to his nieces. She described him as a guy that would like to challenge himself for the fun of it.…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 08:09 AM
–

Exactly EVERYONE has standards it’s simply men are allowed women How can you type this fully believing it is true when men are vilified for simply wanting a non-overweight women? Like genuine question. Like nobody is complaining that woman have standards for men they wish to enter long term relationships, men complain when men that fail a majority if not almost all of the standards that women arbitrarily make but he happens to be hot so he gets a free pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 10:35 PM
7

like y’all really dont think these men have more motivation to deny this to the ends of the earth even if it was true? Of course, SA is still a crime. Which means jail. I'd assume that every person would deny murder allegations as well. who has more incentive to lie? who has more to lose if they dont lie Considering the massive support and immediate rallying of the wagons in defense of the accuser...? No clue. Both equally have reasons to lie. I've said this before, my immediate reaction to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 09:50 PM
42

Thatsthejoke.jpeg
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:49 PM
1

You do understand that one of the fundamental drives most men had at some point in their lives it the white-picket fence middle class American dream? If normal men become jaded by society for any magnitude of reasons that you consider valid or not, this will still create problems along the road. Because society is built upon with the notion that these men will continue moving the cog around, but if they renounce it, or simply do the bare minimum in order to afford an apartment and a gaming conso…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:43 PM
1

You seem fo be confused, past education was more liberal before it was mass adopted into the current sedentary education that we have today what you claim is "old" education, is barely 80 to 100 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 09:43 AM
2

They also didn’t have the technological advantage of the internet and social media. You do understand that part of the reason why the first wave of feminism was so successful was because independent "cells" were naturally created all over the Western world, right? You do understand that the first wave mostly just went against primarily local politics related to their immediate community and it then grew from there? It means that it was easier to pressure these local government officials because …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 04:30 AM
10

Lmao, feminism started from a book released in 1790-ish. The first wave of feminism did not do shit until the late 19th century. Even if we were to compare the age head to head men still have around 80 years to first start doing something.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:31 PM
2

You are right. We should make all fem-coded subs like TwoX ban rape/SA posts I mean, we don't have to hear it all the time right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:28 PM
2

I don’t know what world you’re living in, but boys were held to lower standards than girls when I was in school, and I’m gen z. They would be praised for not disrupting class and sitting still. You do understand that exactly the problem with current education philosophy? Natural boy behavior is discouraged in order to make them as passive as possible in order to lazily educate them in order for them to memorize and vomit information in the same exact way. Part of the reason why boys struggle mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 08:25 PM
2

Not sex related, but I had my second gf "talk" to her friend how I wasn't as tall as her exes. I'm 5'9. She was 5'3. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:30 PM
4

Boys have been systematically discriminated against since early childhood by schools, teachers, parents, etc. Women are constantly positively praised in media/culture, schools, etc. I'm sure that your childhood sucked. Mine also did. But we are not talking about the exceptions of the rule. We are talking about how a society reinforces the belief that girls and women are automatically considered valuable by virtue of existing. Men and boys are not. We have to provide some kind of practical value …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:14 PM
16

B-but women have it hard toooo!" Average women can go on a dating app and have 1000 matches within 72 hours. What's funny is that unlike men, women's dating advice hasn't needed to adapt to the current dating market. If anything, the lessons parents, specifically fathers, teach their daughters is even more true these days. "Men will like you because of your beauty. Find someone who likes you more than that. Don't fall for their tricks." And yet modern young women either ignore or utterly fail at…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:20 PM
2

Was this after or before he wrote the book? I kind of remember how he said in the book that PUA only gets you inside the door and is not helpful to maintaining relationships. It would be funny if he wrote this and literally fell into the same pitfalls after in his marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 03:06 AM
0

Why do you bring it up then? Because I was explaining why some average men stay or commit so much of their time with flaky girls. Which is par for the course in a debate sub. It's literally the third time I said this twice directly to you. WHAT? That's the shittiest explanation ever. Only an absolute desperate LOSER with no self-esteem would be clinging to a flaky girl. I refuse to believe that the trash you've described is an average man. Because we are not talking about just the average man, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:53 AM
-1

----------> I must avoid men that are pigs ---------> all men are pigs --------->if all men are pigs then it must include attractive men ----------->Therefore I must avoid attractive men as well. I think this is what she is thinking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:40 AM
2

Used to. Yes. Basketball.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:37 AM
1

Maybe you have a resting bitchface (I have that too) or your body language is telling people to stay away.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:35 AM
0

Ahahahaha, are you one of those people that watches this "equality" bullshit on the media and actually believes that men would benefit from it in any way? What's the outcome you were expecting for men on dating apps? Please point to where I said that men should be getting 100s of matches. And this is the MEN'S problem that THEY need to address: Expectation of instant gratification. That's just not going to happen, if you're not in top 20%, and 80% of men are not 🤷🏽‍♂️ If you aren't hot as fuck, …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:29 AM
2

Not just that, but the people who are arguing against this forget a very important thing. Unlike women, average men don't have a 100-person line of potential partners at a moment's notice. The men that are "wasting their time" with the flaky girl, most likely DON'T have any other potential girl that they can immediately switch their attention and be reciprocated instantly. So, of course, these men will try their hardest to make it work with the flaky girl. It's the best option for the few option…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 01:03 AM
3

From my experience hanging out with mostly overweight/mid girls in college as a clique for an entire college year, mid women are substantially pickier than other women. The hottest girl of the group had a string of boyfriends with different looks/personalities/handsomeness, while the majority of the mid/overweight women were constantly obsessing with their man having a very specific look and personality and any man who was below that standard was immediately disqualified and mocked relentlessly …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:53 AM
6

Yes but we’re not saying one is perfect. It is an either/or contest so it’s about which is better. No it isn't. Because I never brought up nor implied nor explicitely said that Trump's/Republican's proposals for education were better. I simply asked why should men vote for a party that wants to further systematically discriminate against their own group.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:11 PM
–

No, I did not. I just pointed out the irony and then clarified by question for you. I'm not saying Trump's ideas are better. But to say that men should overwhelming vote Democrat because they will "help" this issue is frankly not true, because the programs and ideas they promote already discriminates against boys and created the school gender-bias in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:06 PM
–

You are so far affected by the Trump Derangement Syndrome that you think me criticizing your stance on this issue is the same as me supporting Trump. The fucking irony of an educated woman being this close-minded while having the reading comprehension of a 5 year old child. No wonder women succeed with the current sedentary education, when all you have to do is memorize information and vomit it in the same way, women will always beat men at it and that includes political insults. I'm gonna say i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:01 PM
–

I’m saying if it’s such a big problem it would affect how men vote. You did not say that. You said this: So men should vote for democrats and support better public education for all. Right? "Hey guys if you really care about this issue, you should vote for the political group that further wants to implement the same policies that disproportionately affects your gender!"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:51 PM
–

Get more involved in education and create a curriculum that boys would do better in. You do understand that this gender bias in school is a relatively new thing right? Before we massively promoted sedentary education, men did far bigger in education. How are men now supposed to change curriculums that better help boys, when they are disproportionately discriminated against even in the top levels of Academia? "Just change the national/global/first world concensus on sedentary education bro, easy.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:47 PM
–

God, I love having the "privilege" of struggling harder by the basis of my gender. Men ftw!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:30 PM
–

Lmao. I'm not arguing in favor of Trump or Republicans either. But I am asking you, why should men vote Democrat solely on democrats pushing for more public education programs when it's those same programs that disproportionately discriminates against boys and men? Like your entire comment very clearly promotes that this problem would be fixed with people voting for democrats, when if anything, further expanding such programs would make the problem worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:24 PM
–

Considering that public education is the one that most promotes the gender bias in schools and disproportionately discriminates against boys, why should one vote democrat when they want to further push that discrimination? Like, legit question.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:15 PM
–

UNESCO offers this rationale for why boys' education is important: Globally, improving educational opportunities for girls continues to be of paramount importance [...] Better-educated men are more likely to help in the household and take on care responsibilities [...] boys who have a secondary education are more likely to condemn gender-based violence Lmao. Classic example of "Men are struggling, Women most affected." Even when addressing the benefits of having Men get better education, not eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:13 PM
10

Lmao. Got a friend that is 6'4, chiseled face, almost never talks, used to hang out with us "school shooter" types of guys, and still slayed pussy left and right. Being an attractive person means that everything you do is going to be ALWAYS perceived as better than an ugly person. An ugly person is creepy, an attractive person is eccentric. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:01 PM
11

Because the majority of feminists do not agree with you, which in turn makes you, a misogynist in their views. Because you are restricting and dictating what women should do with their bodies. Oof.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:19 PM
24

All the porn subs exist Ah. You must be one of those traditional feminists that thinks porn as a whole is misogynistic. Unfortunately for you, the majority of feminists currently do not think that way, hence why they defend women who post in these kinds of sub, which is why these subs are alive and thriving. Mens rights etc Men's rights is not a popular sub. If it got to that point it gets nuked from orbit. Case in point. /r/foreveralone /r/incel subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:14 PM
34

Reddit is overwhelmingly male and overwhelmingly misogynist. TwoX is a default sub. Admins have systematically banned every misogynistic or adjacent popular subs that employ similar political world views. Incel-adjacent subs were carpet bombed and nuked from orbit. You can't go one day without a /r/Comic /r/Popular /r/Pics /r/offmychest post talking about the struggles of women in some way, shape, or form. REddIT IS OvERWHeLMINglY mALe and oVerWHeLMiNgly miSOgYNiST. God, I wish I was this delusi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:08 PM
5

Considering that the majority of the sub is women, a book club would be more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:04 PM
1

The amount of money a woman receives from child support will rarely if ever offset the amount of work she has to do in taking care of a baby Except the majority of times where women commit paternity fraud is because they have a LACK of options. Most of the want to and commit paternity fraud, do so against the men that are more financially stable. Regardless of how much chip support they would realistically get. It doesn't matter if child support they receive doesn't offset the costs of the child…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 04:12 AM
1

Because it is not only wealthy women. If middle-class women are acting in the same way, this causes problems as well. Like sure, if you were telling the top 1% of women earners were acting this way, you would have got a point. But when you look at statistics, women as young as 20 are ALREADY outearning their male counterparts, and this divide will only keep increasing. Eventually, this issue and others will culminate in a critical mass that will affect how future generations look at relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:49 AM
4

I did a DNA test on both my daughter, myself, and her mom, plus my grandmother, and both of my parents for the purpose of determining ancestry. Nobody threw a fit Tbf, there's a difference between "Hey, let's check out where our ancestors come from!" and "Hey, I think you cheated. I want a paternity test."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:42 AM
1

The overwhelming likelihood is that if a woman is telling you it's your child, then it's your child. Why, yes. Why would a woman ever lie about something as important as that? Or God forbid, she may be wrong. I know, I know, this is practically impossible, women can't ever be wrong, but it's still possible. But if the child isn't yours, then assuming you act promptly, you are not on the hook for child support. You do understand the problem with Paternity Fraud is that the fraud happened years or…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:32 AM
2

There’s no law saying you HAVE to sign the birth certificate right away or that paternity is assumed if you’re not married. There are places where it is possible for the woman to put a man's name on the birth cert even if he doesn't want to. He would need to actively deny it by submitting an appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:25 AM
1

Even if it were a real issue, which it isn't, there's a clear and obvious medical solution to the problem. See. I have been thinking for like 5 mins at as type this comment trying to understand what medical solution are you talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:13 AM
1

The problem is not that they are treated differently. It's that women won't admit to using those strategies. It's basically common place that men do have different standards for hook ups vs relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:03 AM
1

Honestly from speaking front experience and those around me. Very rarely do men DON'T pick up on cues. But rather that because of negative reinforcement, they rationalize any flirting as just friendliness because men self-doubt and would rather not kick the hornest nest, so to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter