TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The-Devilz-Advocate Archive

View 3 posts and 1,351 comments by The-Devilz-Advocate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,351 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Not when you compare them to same jobs, experience and work hours. And young women are now also outearning men too. But i guess that's fine now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 11:00 AM
–

Technically speaking, neither are white women, but we still have many protections for them in place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 10:24 AM
4

The idea that women have "no rules for the men they like" confuses attraction with social norms. Attraction has always been uneven. People overlook flaws in people they're attracted to. That's true for men and women alike. It isn't evidence that women don't have standards or that they're inventing rules to punish men. They might not be conciously doing so, but that's the effect of such. If a person observes that two people get different responses out of the same action, then the variable that ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 03:55 PM
0

2023 Allen, TX killed 8 (not just incel, white supremacist too) His motives are still unknown, and seem more possibly due to neo nazism than inceldom. Isla Vista shooting, 100% incel related. It's Elliot Rodgers. Roseburg too. Aztec shooting is highly disputed, the police state that the motive for the shooting was personal and to gain noitoriety. The southern poverty law center argues that it was because of racism and inceldom, but this is suspect because the same organization's bottom line is d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:57 PM
2

You read the first sentence and then ran with it, didn't you? Read the entirety of my comment and respond to it. Otherwise you just look like somebody pulled your pants down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:21 PM
2

Did you bother to check his bio before actually typing that? He was already starring in roles in 1995 and was already known as a C-list actor like Steve Buscemi. He made a movie with him, then due to nobody wanting to be his agent, Buscemi personally recommended him to other directors, and by 2003 he was getting STARRING ROLES in independent movies. The station agent, arguably his breakout movie, won him an award and 2 nominations and got him other independent movie roles with famous actors. His…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:13 PM
–

Under every video I see about a girl being abused by a grown man. It's always men defending the predator. Reminder that Harvey Weinstein's trial in Manhattan was declared a mistrial because the jurors could not agree to a decision. The jurors were composed of 8 men and 4 women, the last vote was 9 in favor of a guilty verdict and 3 against. All of the jurors that voted against his guilt, were women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 10:30 PM
–

Fifty Shades of Grey, She's All That, 10 Things I Hate About You, HAIRSPRAY, Trainwreck (Amy Schumer and John Cena), The Dark Knight, The Way We Were, a majority of Melissa McCarthy's movies, The Shape Of Water, a majority of TV Shows and Movies where Lena Dunham is in, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:36 PM
5

we shouldn’t say a lack of self awareness or low iq gets you laid when that specifically makes most women more likely to reject you all because you can spam it and eventually succeed. Except it does... That's the point. If women are naturally adverse to men approaching anyways, why would a guy who is remotely interested in a woman, wait and build a friendship that could take months on the off chance that it could blossom into a loving relationship, assuming this woman doesn't have a major red fl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 04:12 PM
5

Being ugly, good with a backbone only means you will be single, but at least never played or used by women more than once per if you choose to be optimistic to their very rare approaches. You will still be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:36 PM
–

if you responded “yeah maybe you’re right” when they say they’re ugly and no one likes them Probably because it's usually worded as an insult and condescending attitude than simply agreeing with them. People that do it here do so to ragebait them with backhanded comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:23 PM
0

Only recently btw. And that's because unironicslly, colleges and universities have studied that new college applicants prefer a balanced or male dominated gender ratio for students than a female dominated gender ratio. Even freshmen women seem to avoid colleges that have a perception of being dominated by women or have a ratio where women are the majority. So now, very recently, like in the past 4 years or so, colleges are starting to accept more men to combat so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 01:27 PM
18

A significant number of progressive people will talk about how patriarchy harms men and women, but we’ve done a terrible job of communicating that to men who aren’t already immersed in progressive circles. The problem of not just the lack of communication of how it affects both men and women, but feminism has constantly pushed the idea that men, specially boys growing up TODAY somehow perpetrate it and are JUST AS A GUILTY as men of the past, and have to actively pay for the sins, of not just th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:09 AM
0

The midlife crisis angle I used was to simply highlight that if an attractive person perceives themselves as not getting the attention they should, or at least what they deem as normal to them, and then see other people of similar or less attractiveness getting more attention than them from social media, they would be inclined to post on social media to recieve that attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 05:13 PM
0

Hot people have gone their entire lives receiving attention. Even as teenagers. So I’m not convinced that external validation means as much or exists as often described in these context. Pretty sure (Ha get it?) that it's the opposite. There's a reason why attractive people seem to have a sudden mid-life crisis when their looks start to dwindle, specially from women, and then get obsessed into keeping their youth for as long as possible, even to the detriment of their overall health. Because sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 04:43 PM
5

Why is this always framed so negatively? Is resilience not beneficial? Perseverance? What about learning to handle rejection with grace and maturity? Through sheer volume? Because usually, the men and boys that ask such advice, typically are unattractive and/or socially awkward, so in their eyes, they have already experienced tons of rejections and shunning from both men and women, so now, to have them INTENTIONALLY do that while trying to keep a hopeful and cheerful attitude, as they willingly …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 04:19 PM
–

Wonder if that's lift and lurk or solo and the wookie. Both of them are the biggest male LARPers here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:55 PM
5

Jenny led him on when she needed something from him, wether it was a friend, stability, love, or intimacy, she knew Forrest liked her more than just a friend, even if he didn't really understood it himself. Jenny should have made a clean break from him period, but instead kept him at an arm's length in the case she needed him. How is it so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:42 PM
14

I hope people don’t jump down my throat here, but from what you describe it is kind of how I feel when someone calls me the n word. The difference would be that the person that is calling you the n word, is attributing you to a group of people, ergo, they are insulting you by using a word that was used to describe in a derogatory way towards a group. Emasculation is mostly on the personal. You don't actively attack all men, or a group of men, you attack a single man, and then say he doesn't even…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:16 PM
3

I never said the majority of the checklist, I said what the majority of the focus lies, on the ones that are superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:13 PM
6

emasculated is more hurtful than other forms of being hurt. I have had experiences where I’ve felt embarrassed, humiliated, or less than. Because esmasculation is all of that and more? The point is that it directly targets a man's identity not only for himself, but in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 07:40 PM
4

When a majority of the checklists they focus on, are superficial and the physical, instead of the character of the man they want, they will inevitably keep failing. You can have 100 different ideal things you want, but if you only focus on the most vain of them, then all you will get is vanity back.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:48 PM
13

Of course this raises the bar infinitely. I dont understand why that is suprising. It's surprising because they end up falling for the same man that exhibits the opposite of those values she cares so much about, only to end up in the same exact place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:07 PM
-5

The same applies to women tho: They want a guy with a successful job. A lot of money. Assets such as house/car paid off. Swimmer's build/Gym grinder. Taller than the average man. Cooks/cleans/does all the chores because that's not a woman's job anymore Is attentive/compassionate. Is emotionally open. Is sexually competent with no history. At the same time can't judge her sexual/dating history. Can handle her antics/psychological games Has a good family/gets along with hers Lets her walk all over…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:56 PM
2

Humans can't separate the logical from the emotional and viceversa. There's a reason why every study that compares what genders find attractive vs what they say is attractive proves that people are not conscious of the difference. Men say they would date an attractive chick that works at McDonald's while they work a 100k job, but results do show that they would prefer somebody closer to their financial bracket. Women state that they find a lot more men's physical features attractive than what th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:36 PM
–

I mean both can be a thing? You can miss/long having sex outright, and you can also miss/long for a stable relationship. Why does it have to be either/or?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 06:59 PM
2

At least you have your self-respect when you want off in a basement than essentially being so close yet so far to actually being loved and appreciated as a basic human.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 11:04 AM
2

In what world is being a cuck anything close to having an emotional and physical connection with a partner? The entire point is that you are so unattractive/sexually reprehensible that your partner will actively humiliate you by having sex with other people in front of you or st least blatantly without a care in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 10:04 AM
4

Judicial disparity and biases exist yes—and the majority of judges are still male. Men have a less in-group bias than women btw. If anything, most judges being men means that sentences are generally more equal compared to a majority female judge since women generally have and look at their own group through a favorable lense. Also—While men overall face harsher sentencing than women, Black and Hispanic men face a staggering compound disparity. In the U.S., a Black man is statistically far more l…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:16 PM
9

Because it means that good-natured men only become relevant when women look for long term partners. Basically, good guys finish last, after the women play the field. Keep in mind, I don't necessarily believe that, but this came straight from the horse's mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 03:05 AM
–

Brutal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:01 PM
6

Why does this feel like a complaint that women will have more freedom to choose a partner based on desire and the happiness their partner brings to their lives rather than being pressured to settle for someone Not really a complaint tho. Just stating that it would just exharbitate the issues already present in apps like Tinder etc. Just on a societal scale. No, it means something even worse.. it means the balance of power would shift to women. It would shift to the attractive men, because those …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:52 PM
–

That type of objectification does happen with men, but it's usually... I know. That still doesn't disprove what I said, nor that society doesn't reduce men to that objectification. It's not like women are all just going. "He's a free meal ticket." A man's value in a society, is how useful he is to that society. That includes the women that live in that society. So they partake in that form of objectification towards men. Sigh... Someone who is sensitive to a man's goals and other attributes besi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:18 PM
–

Sure... let me double disprove the study made by an AI company posted by a person that can't bother to actually read even the headlines of it, and thought that posting 3 different links of the same wrongful study that has no mention of the actual way it gathered data nor how they determined it's value sets nor the methods they used, then responded with immediate offense and insults, surely that person will change their minds right? Stop asking chat-gpt for links and actually read the studies tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:09 PM
–

But you did not mention qualities outside of that hypothetical woman's usefulness (that she's smart and driven with accomplishments under her belt), that by definition is objectivication. What? Do you think sexual objectiviation is the only type of objectivication?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:04 PM
–

Ironically, the fact that you only mentioned the utility/goals of a potential hypothetical woman, that being that she's smart, ambitious, and has accomplishments, would be categorized as an objectivication as well. That type of objectivication mostly happens to men, tho, so I guess that must be why it flew over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:56 PM
12

The reward for going to work and contributing to society is your paycheck and negotiated benefits such as paid days off, health insurance and a pension/401k Those are not rewards. That's what you get as exchange for your services, aka work. Why do women literally become hard core conservatives when it comes to dating issues. If you go to work and they give you a paycheck at the end of your day for the work you did, that's an exchange of services.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:31 PM
-4

She won't answer because there is no way it actually will unless you account the reality that only the attractive men will see an increase or rather drive up the sex statistic. This means that the balance of power will shift from wealthy elites (primarily men btw) to attractive men. Which if she had any semblance of intelligence and had read any kind of study about such, would realize that often than not, successful wealthy men tend to be more physically attractive, charismatic, taller than aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:20 PM
2

First link: The usual subjects are the biggest culprits. "Emotional" takes the cake with 78% of women having been described by that term versus just 11% of men. "Unlikeable" was used to describe 56% of women versus 16% of men. "Difficult" is the most evenly spread of the negative stereotypes, with 32% of women, 21% of men, and 40% of non-binary and/or gender fluid people having been described as difficult at one point. More troubling than the unbalanced use of negative stereotypes is that the gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 12:03 PM
4

"So many" is not "all". Different people like different things. Majority then. Most women find facial symmetry and a swimmer's build attractive, which is why it's so permeative and common in hollywood/K-pop etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:54 PM
–

I’m calling out the double standard that only women’s actions and feelings are being critiqued. Again, don’t expect you guys to be Batman. The men who complain usually don’t speak out against the weirdos and that’s what I’ve realized. I've mentioned why in other comments: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1hjbvt8/comment/m36l5iu/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button When women confront men in public, even if they use physical for…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:40 PM
–

Don't most major retailers just let people steal, tracking how much they steal every time they visit the store, to then call the cops once it becomes a major crime instead of a petty one?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:28 PM
5

Searched up her personal life just to see. She revealed that during her 20s she terminated, not one, not two, but three pregnancies. So, assuming Leslie Jones is the lowest of the low in terms of attractive women, at least a single guy out there managed to have sex with her 3 different times unprotected.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 04:28 PM
25

Don’t ask strangers for dating advice. We don’t know you. At best you’re getting broad generalizations and recycled talking points. That has nothing to do with the problem at hand. Because a lot of (mostly) women here haven't dated in half a decade, maybe more, then smugly act condescending towards grievances made by people who are currently trying to date. They come here to shit stir the pot while calling themselves superior while using therapy speak or "sweetie" speak Exhibit A of the kind of …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:24 PM
1

In terms of casual sex, we don't need to align on every moral aspect of the man we are fucking. But he has to be the baseline of nice and respectful In terms of initial attraction, the entire point of getting your ass in the seat in front of him, it doesn't matter. Like you said, he could be the biggest asshole in his vicinity but as long as he doesn't treat you that way for 1-2 hours, you can sleep with him no problem. And most of these red pill men aren't really that baseline of respectful or …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:06 PM
3

I think being "good" is a factor. Its just women see that as the baseline. Again, if that were true, the opposite wouldn't be fairly regular. Women of all ages do not particularly care about the morality of a man until after they want a long term relationship with him. If being good was a baseline for women, then average but good men would be constantly sought after (compared to average but horrible men), when in reality it's not (cosntant studies show this), the most important baseline for attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:41 PM
3

Sure. Another issue of red pill is that they act like women do this a lot more than them This might be because of difference worldview perspectives. Most men right now grew up with the idea that women's romantic and sexual inclinations were closely related to morality and virtues. So as long as men were virtuous and good, they would be the ones more sought after by women. The reality is that it's not a factor. You believe that red pillers say that "women do it more than men", when in reality the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:24 PM
4

My issue with redpill is that they think men are chosen because they are assholes. But men are chosen for their attractiveness If you only engaged with the current redpill grift that would be accurate. But the old RP, born from TRP-esque communities used to say exactly that. Hell, even the ones nowadays still say that, but it's mostly just "Attractive men don't have worry about being pleasant/non-assholes because attractiveness supersedes personality for most women." Again, very rarely do I even…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 03:08 PM
1

Both RP and blackpill believe in the same "truths". The difference is what they believe people or men should go about it. RP says yeah, world is shit, women are hypergamistic and superficial, yes the world generally treats men worse, but hey, if you work on yourself both physically and socially, you would be one of the few top men enjoying the "decline" (decline of the world turning into shit). Blackpill looks at the same truths and says, nah, men are doomed if they weren't born with the right g…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:17 PM
–

Then you're probably not compatible and should just move on. It's nothing to be angry at her about. Is it not the main argument from RP that if a woman does not want to do her best with the man they are currently dating, then that man should break up with her and find one that does?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:07 PM
–

Platonic In love Now I understand why people use Chat-GPT. Fucking dumbasses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:52 PM
6

suddenly that same sexual attention becomes chemistry, tension, flirting", that's because the woman has decided to engage with the man His argument is that she chooses to engage with it AFTER she's unwillingly sexually objectified. It's a very different situation if a man walks up to her, starts talking sexually, she ignores him or asks him to go away But that's not the scenario he's talking about. He's talking about the idea that women don't want to be sexually objectified, period. He is arguin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:14 PM
3

I was gonna be snark and respond back that it's hilarous that a synopsis of a book released almost 200 years ago would need spoiler tags... but I'll add it instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 05:37 PM
0

I'm considering it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 05:27 PM
12

It's a reference to a book called Mobey Dick... you know... the novel famously known for portraying a ship captain's obsession of killing a massive whale called Mobey Dick to the point that he throws his entire life into the hunt of the creature that ends with him finally stabbing the large whale with a harpoon line, which gets accidentally tied around the Captain's neck as well as the entire ship, dragging all of them to the bottom of the ocean.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:47 PM
7

Because it paints a very bleak world, if it's true that almost every woman on earth finds 80% of men unattractive and simply not worth considering. Men have more varying degrees of preferences, which would average out the bell curve of attractiveness of women. Meaning that the majority would be paired off with a man who finds them attractive. According to you and the person you responded to, it's literally a fantasy that the average man will ever find a woman that physically finds them attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:42 PM
14

But that begs a question: Why do women behemently deny that assertion? That they find the majority of men unattractive at best, and at worst, they don't even register in their worldview? It seems like a very big thing to simply deny or hand wave.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 04:36 PM
–

And the answer to that is work on your qualifications to improve your resume... You proved their point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:20 PM
19

what women should be doing for men When women complain about dating, it's because the men they date are not doing things they want them to do. So, same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 12:08 PM
0

It's not that you don't understand the point he's trying to make. It's that you are trying to call him wrong by stating the only example in which he already acknowledged and dismissed. Even if you believe he is wrong there should be more evidence of the contrary that you could name, yet you didn't bother to name a single one. Either that or you can't read correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:13 PM
1

I mean let's be honest. When women feel offended at a man, they default back into the same insults without checking the Validity of them: Incel, virgin, misogynist
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:09 PM
1

Read the title of this post, and you'll get why your response only proved his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:06 PM
–

Outliers aren't just Stacy and Chad. ????? I never said they were. I said that men's standards have to be lower because of the nature of LACK of attention from everyday women. Women get to be the ones who set standards because they are the ones that generally are being sought after, not the men. Which at first can sound hopeless, but if we think about it, we frequently look for answers on the internet where less than one in one billion web pages have the answer I'm not sure what you are trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:53 PM
–

Well, as an outlier who seems to have skipped getting those specific genes, outliers are all that is relevant to me. I mean, mathematically speaking, women can afford to only target outliers as long as they are between average and hot. Average men can't really afford to only further segregate and choose outliers, since a woman putting any kind of effort onto them is already outlier enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:06 PM
2

Absolutely nothing about that sentence indicated narcissism lol This is what he said tho: If you walk into a room and act like a complete douchebag and start hogging attention, you will get rewarded for it while the respectful guy will get overlooked. It's the kind of man that constantly tries to one-up other men in group settings. It's very different from a man who's just chill and likable so everybody looks up to him. It's the male equivalent of a woman that constantly makes a big show and ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 04:03 PM
2

I think this is the first time I upvoted a comment of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:41 PM
–

He's a trumpeter. That is not an "attractive" instrument to play, unless you like, are a total jazz head. So, she's a jazz head then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:34 PM
–

He is tall yes, but that's all he has going for him. And he has no status, he's a studio musician. Lindy makes the money. Aren't male musicians often one of the most attractive "hobbies" for men? Lindy makes the money And she's a morbidly obese woman with lack of social skills and so high up on the "woke" (not my choice of wording, but the far lefty kind), that she is actively allowing herself to get cheated on and taken for granted. She was not! That's the whole point. She only came around to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:05 PM
–

Countless studies done on the matter that people respond more favorably to taller people. But it's apparently not real.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:02 PM
–

I mean, the guy does look fairly average, maybe slightly uglier, but she's still looking far worse, on the account of her being obese. She looks like Kate from "This is Us."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:00 PM
–

You'll be like "Hello! I like to bake and have a husband!" And their immediate response is "would you, perhaps, rate my peen? No? I will be sending it regardless:)" Where are you talking or frequenting at where men do that in droves? Don't women constantly harp on men not going to places where they could have mutual hobbies with women? I'd assume that if you were trying to make friends and liked baking, you would go to a bakery class or a baking competition or something of that nature and meet f…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:58 PM
5

If the group rewards the guy who is exciting and dominating social situations, then he's not exhibiting antisocial behavior is he? Because it's a sign of narcissism which does overlap with anti-social behavior. What he's trying to say is that those men that hog all the attention, often care little about the collective, they often think about their own gain only. They don't care if they are making other people uncomfortable, specially men, because they are the competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:48 PM
3

ICE detention centers have a bunch of pregnant kids that were forced into pregnancy. The states that banned abortion are forcing people to keep pregnancies that were not always a product of voluntary acts. Weren't studies done on the reasons people abort, and like less than 4% of abortions happen because the pregnancy was created in a forced or involuntary act? Like, it's extremely disingenuous to use rapes/incest/etc as justification for your argument when they are far far the smallest percenta…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:41 PM
1

Tbf there's a difference between brining someone on a date and buying them a meal because you want to make them happy, and throwing money at an uninterested party or a party that is clearly not as into you as you are into them. That would be simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:21 AM
7

Something something, woman lived as a man for a year to prove how easy being a guy was, was considered effeminate by men and the women she dated, was alone, had nobody to really talk to, she described how women would instantly go on the defensive instead of being warm and receptive when she was a woman. Something Something wrote a book about how terrible it was then ended her own life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:35 AM
-3

Reality but without all the omission of truths women and bp tend to employ to get some of these men to stay in the bucket with the rest of the crabs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:07 PM
1

Why try so hard to date someone when you know they are not compatible with you? You might want to examine your beliefs if you literally have to hide them from your prospective partner because you know they are disqualifying. Because not everything has to be shared and not everything has to be agreed upon. That's all. I keep my TRP beliefs for myself and online.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:13 PM
6

Its just a lot of red pill men do shoot themselves in the foot because they often can't help but express their opinions to women they try to date that gives those women the clear signals that he is red pilled. Thus someone she wants to avoid dating. Literally the first 2 rules about TRP is to not talk about it outside of said space. If a man does, he's actually stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 08:00 PM
11

Ah yes the women who would have clowned on me mercilessly if I commented that I only wanted Kate Upton as an overweight college man Def wanted me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:56 PM
6

It becomes oppression when men say "you don't deserve to want what you want. you should tolerate less". I thought it was clear, but sure, pretend it doesn't happen. I wanted Kate Upton when I was 20 years old. Did I deserve her when I was in college and unemployed and still overweight? Of course not. You know exactly what people mean when they say such responses. If you want to act offended because of it, that's on you. But it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:45 PM
–

Nah women are a Monolith because there's always a ys going to be one claiming they are not. Clearly only monoliths respond in that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:40 PM
–

Or because there's a common narrative going around that women are "happy" being alone... which is directly contradicted by the studies done on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:38 PM
1

it’s your assumption they wouldn’t be doing this? Someone can do all these things and still end up in an abusive relationship. And if they REPEATEDLY end up in those kinds of relationships, it speaks to their inability to learn. Hence the disagreement. They can’t recognise green flags the way people who grew up in healthy environments did. Acting cautious against people that seem to be presenting to themselves as good is never an issue. You can't simultaneously hold the idea that these women kee…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:56 PM
1

Is it the failure of a blind person that they cannot see? It's the failure of a blind person after being told they are blind, realizing they are blind and STILL not trying to find resources to DEAL with their CONDITION. Same thing with being deaf. They are not invalids. They are not children. They can navigate the world in their own way with help as long as it's both provided and seeked out by them. If the areas in your brain needed to form healthy relationships were fucked up in early childhood…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:26 PM
3

Victim blaming It's called accountability. A therapist or psychiatrist that deals with a patient that has what you said, works with them to explore the why, and how to change it. But that's the crux. If you fall for it numerous times, and complain about it, it's on you. What’s failure? If a man gets abused by a woman OPs argument is still valid. Abuse victims are abuse victims (ungendered). Apparently I have more empathy for male abuse victims than you since you’re blaming them or call it “failu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:09 PM
1

radicalization of the Red Pill community and how their ideology has landed them on US domestic terrorism watchlists When did this happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:06 PM
1

So therefore it's up to thesw women to recognize that their prefrontal cortex is fucked and to actively change their ways, right? You aren't just bringing up "past abuse" to remove their accountability and responsibility to grow from it, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:19 PM
2

The term "In group bias " has nothing to do with a group all having the same preferences. It's when a group tends to put more TRUST, Favor and general leniency to their own members OVER the outsiders. Men are more critical to one another, and tend to be more individualistic, women tend to be the opposite. Therefore, women have a higher in-group bias because they tend to protect/favor their own group and are less critical of one another COMPARED to criticizing somebody from outside their group. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:34 PM
–

Women ☕️...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:27 PM
2

Did you read the edit? That part I quoted is from the study itself. That's why I know for a fact that you did not read even the abstract of the study you are referencing. You aren't lazy. You are just purposely ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 04:35 PM
4

Do you have any evidence of this? And don’t men hate when women settle? The study in question literally spells it out for you. What other evidence, do you need? Women have higher physical/beauty standards for men they end up with, than what they state they want for their ideal partners. So literally it spells out "Alpha fucks" like huh? Okay? Should women date men they don’t want to? Why can’t a woman just stay single if she wants to? Is every woman obligated to date someone? Where did this idea…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:08 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:32 PM
3

You just don't get to reliably avoid the bad ones, bc the labels are not trustworthy. You could be holding a good one in one hand, and a bad one in the other, and not be able to tell the difference at all. Even cracking them open isn't necessarily gonna tell you. Yeah, but if you REPEATEDLY take the bad soda, then that leads to the problem of accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:32 PM
1

To understand the source of pay differences, we looked at the overall pay gap, and also at the differences in earnings for men and women when they work in the same occupation, in the same company, and in the same position in the same company At least I'm the article referencing the study. Nowhere does it state that they actually accounted for an equal time spent on the same company. Just that they worked at the same company and had the same position and/or job title. Did you read your own articl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:23 PM
2

But on the other hand you have to do something with those data points and every choice is going to impact your results. I mean, the reality is that you have to put an "uncategorized" point, and either specifically cite the actual reasons they dropped out or find the most common ones and include them in the survey. You can not just meaningfully ignore those data points just because it looks better for your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:18 PM
4

Yeah, the problem is not the researcher or author that made the biased study. It's that the people who should act as the great filters in journals AKA peer-reviewers tend to also be just as biased, instead of objective, which defeats the entire point of peer-review.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:15 PM
4

People generally don’t know what they want. Stated vs revealed preferences are consistently very different in studies, for BOTH men and women. For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. "A Worldwide Test of the Predictive Validity…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:11 PM
1

Then explain incels. "If women all collectively ignore that man, either that man stays alone, or is forced to change perspectives."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 04:23 PM
7

I suppose unfortunately the corrolary is that many of the women he dates also hold the same perspective, or at least are used to it and roll with it to a fair extent. You'd need enough women that he wants to date that are bothered enough to make a stink about it and actually impact his dating prospects to see significant results. But if that were true, there wouldn't be such a stink from so many women about the "asshole" men to begin with. Either women tolerate behavior they shouldn't because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:00 PM
8

This isn't really true, though -- really the only person who has the power to change his mindset is himself, right? Nobody else can absolutely ensure that he will. Obviously. Nothing will ensure he change perspectives, but an incentive that is granted to him to change perspectives, is if women collectively choose to ignore him. Hence my point. I think what you're describing here is the idea that women, having something he cares about more than whatever men have, possibly have more leverage than …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 10:50 PM
9

If a man only cares about tits, it won’t matter if she’s covered up, “respectable,” young, old, shy, loud, religious, married, liberal, conservative. He’ll only think in cup sizes. He’s already made up his mind women are only good for a nice pair of tits to look at. And if that's his prerogative then he should own up to the consequences. I fail to understand the issue. If a man only thinks that women are good for their tits, it is not up to me or the other men in his life to change his behavior.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 10:16 PM
–

Men here claim we go for the abusive chads and thays why we are abused and we should choose better (which, yes. We should choose better) Women tend to choose men on their attractiveness while also ignoring red flags. Men state that the problem is not women that choose chads but rather that women do not USE the same standards between men that are chads, and those that are not. If a woman is struggling, it is because she almost always chooses to ignore red flags in favor of attractiveness. But fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:28 PM
–

The hot men are never the ones I have been abused by lol. Its always the red pilled men and the men im pressured to give a chance to who have been the problem Where did I state that the men that redpill "claim" you should go out with, are chads? The most manipulative men I have met are the traditionally non chads. Which is why I assume you already ignore them to begin with... exactly what I said in my last comment... You need to put more effort into your reading skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:21 PM
–

Im perfectly content with the men who have chosen me. And of whom I have chosen I said YOU as in the woman that is not vetting attractive men and ending up chosen by abusive ones. I have had my worst experiences with the men red pill men claim I need to give a chance to because we women need to give non chads a chance If that was your experience, then nothing is stopping you from simply ignoring those kind of men. Which I assume you already did do for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:17 PM
–

men. Red pill men tho. Lift and lurk gets an exception cuz he a BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:16 PM
1

Where women feel hurt is when men respond defensively instead of curiously. You know, there was a time where that was the case. You know when? Right before and during the Metoo era. And what did women constantly state? Asking questions or probing for answers from women is the same as supporting their violence or questioning "their" truth. You do nor get to simply dismiss that portion of how WOMEN respond to questions to that just because it suits your argument. Women get offended if you probe or…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:12 PM
–

Like, have you considered a lot of good looking guys are actually really good guys? Yeah, but they aren't "choosing" YOU. The entire point is that somehow the woman that is whining about attractive men, always seems to end up with a shitty one. When men make that statement. They don't state it to any and all women, they specifically state it women that keep repeatedly whining about "horrible" men that mistreat then in some way. So in that case it 100% applies. Choose better. I constantly use tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:56 PM
–

Yeah but the entire point of your commemt is kind of contradictory. So men ghost after sex. Okay, and? If anything, wouldn't it be far easier to assess if a man wants to be in a relationship with you if you sleep with him quicker rather than potentially spending months building a relationship with him only to sleep with him once and realize it's all fake? That's your own logic btw. I'm simply following your stream of thought. So in the end, the only thing "preventing" you from not "choosing bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:51 PM
2

Men compete with my peace. Men compete with my joy. Men compete with no responsibilities. Men compete with my life without cooking, cleaning and sex pestering. Men compete with my freedom and independence. Tell me you don't understand the meaning of the word "compete", without telling you don't understand the meaning of the word "compete". Men compete against other men, for YOU. Your peace, your joy, your "no responsibilities" etc etc. They compete for your attention. Unless you are ONLY putting…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 03:31 PM
0

To be fair i have probably as much dead conversations and i just move on and never even though to say that it's me jumping through hoops Because it's easier for women to do that, since the man has to "do the bare minimum" of setting up everything in the initial stages. Congrats you proved my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:56 PM
0

Well to be fair i remember how they said that "jumping through hoops" was basically making a conversation, or choosing a place to meet, so i don't know anymore It's "jumping through hoops" when the woman does not reciprocate anything and replies in one word answers. It's a monkey dance because of the same point. This entire post and your worldview revolves on the singular idea that the only men that exist in the world are attractive men that the women who agree to go out with them find insanely …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:49 PM
4

I see it here, when i ask how men are going to compete if they understand that women are getting way more attention than them. And men act humiliated that they have to do anything. Your first sentence has nothing to do with the other. Men ALREADY COMPETE with other men with the women they are trying to woo. Men ALREADY are figuratively fighting for the attention of the woman. Men that complain HERE do so because this is the only sub where you are allowed to. Who or where else will you complain t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:01 PM
3

I don't mind numbers perse, but standards. I've known serial monogamisst that have 20+ exes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:19 PM
–

You know what. I was going to disagree with you, but I see your point. That's definitely coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:18 PM
–

https://i.imgur.com/KgdZ69s.png
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 03:09 PM
1

nah it wasn't me but I did chuckle at it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 07:51 AM
-11

That guy was shitposting tho. Clearly in jest. But you know what the say about women and humor...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 11:59 PM
7

Also, anger is stereotypically the only emotion that gets culturally coded as “masculine.” And complaining and moaning is often culturally coded as "feminine" hence why the term bitch is used towards women. Because just like a female dog in heat, they "bitch and moan". So either both aren't enough to be used in any scientific context or both are. But you can't pick and choose when it's convenient to your argument or position.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:21 AM
1

Tatakae-Kaw!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:07 AM
2

It's because of the amount of makeup and botox she has on at all times. When she was younger she didn't have that much make up on and looked way better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 02:04 AM
9

Women score more neurotic in Big Five” comes from women self reporting having more negative emotions such as being anxious, depressed, and self conscious. This doesn’t equal women complaining more. I’ve seen no such study that indicates that. That same study also states that men exhibit more emotions like anger than women, which is commonly repeated by women all the time but I guess since it's a self-report by men too, that means it's false right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 01:57 AM
–

And I'm stating why the way you wrote the sentence is the issue at hand. You put the cart BEFORE the horse. That's the problem. You made it seem as if young men are the ones refusing to date older women than them, when it's the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:05 PM
2

It's a meme because it's a joke. Memes are jokes. Jokes are memes. And some jokes are made as a reflection of society. The term "hood cricket" is made in jest to any video/stream/clip of a person filming themselves and not noticing how the smoke detector is begging for new batteries throughout the entire video. Why is it called hood? Because people from the hood often are the ones filming themselves ignoring it. It's a joke and a commentary at the same time. The 6/6/6 meme is exactly the same. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:03 PM
1

It's the difference between calling yourself an atheist because you grew up in an abusive religious environment and attribute all religious people as that environment and calling yourself an athiest because you evaluated, did your own research and determined that that's the most likely realistic scenario of the creation of our universe. One calls themselves an atheist because they are doing it as a form of counter-culture, and the other calls themselves an atheist because they evaluated reality …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 01:30 PM
–

I did. You implied that the young men are the ones not willing to date older women, stating that the barrier that older women have that impedes them dating young men, is the young men themselves, when women are the ones that specifically AVOID dating younger men than themselves in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 01:24 PM
1

No, because she is saying that the reason why older women don't date younger men is because young men avoid them. When that's not true either. She's putting the blame on younger men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 12:38 PM
1

Interesting, seems like this ideology is based on some pretty rough crowds It's an ideology that was born out of men that were "chads" explaining how they operated to unattractive and borderline autistic men. That's the RP in a nutshell. Explaining how dating dynamics work for autistic men because those men are the ones that need to understand it the most and don't have the resources outside of RP to learn so. Hence why personal accountability used to be a big thing in their subreddit before it …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:41 AM
1

Two things: One of the first "rules" you were taught about women in TRP was that they lie when it comes to their sexual partners. So it's best to always just operate on the idea that the woman you are dating has already had 10+ partners. Because that way, you don't emotionally latch yourself onto them if turns out they had more sexual partners than they had originally stated. Hence why the "don't date over 25+" is stated... because it generally means less baggage and sexual history...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:29 AM
2

Hmm, I've personally seen a lot of RP that do promote the idea of settling with and marrying a good, traditional woman, but maybe that's a newer branch off of the ideology. RP is about maximizing dating for men. You casually date women "under 25" because they have less baggage, then if you want, you marry a "traditional" woman and settle down with her. There is no disconnect, it's just that when it comes to DATING, RP discussions are about casual dating, not about serious relationship situations…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:24 AM
7

I often see alot of emphasis on a woman's age in the red pill (usually extremes like over 25 is a no go) aswell as emphasis on traditional lifestyles. Your response to this is to make up a hypothetical that ignores the context of why "over 25 is a no go"? The whole point of why RP used to promote the idea that over the age of 25 was a no go, is because the woman that was over the age of 25 and was dating, was looking to SETTLE after supposedly playing the field and having her fun. RP usually pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:14 AM
3

That's not the reason. Women date slightly older guys because those slightly older guys are more established and financially stable than them. A college freshman will date a senior, or a graduate that works has his own apartment etc. A 17 year old will date a 19 year old that has his own car etc. Older women don't date down. They date equal or up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:07 AM
3

For example: below average men think their experiences are the same as all men. Ask an average man how much he gets laid or how many Tinder dates he can set up. Most of them will either say 0 or 1 or 2 every 4 months or so. It's only women that geniunely believe that only below average men struggle to date. When the truth kf the matter is that average men all struggle with dating, uglier men just struggle more and are more toxic'vocal about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:04 AM
3

It's a matter of perspective. A person that lives in a much better socio-economic situation than somebody in India would laugh at the notion of somehow an Indian person bullying another since they are both in a "poor" country. A person living in India that has only ever experienced such a life, being mercilessly bullied by another, is obviously going to feel like shit. It's not a hard concept to grasp.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:01 AM
–

I'm not a rape excuser either moron. I simply stated that women do play coy instead of simply walking out. That doesn't mean I excuse rape or, godforbid, perpetrate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:46 PM
1

Yeah but that's the thing, when women talk to about consent, they talk about things that are VIOLATED after sexual contact have been made. Like you said, you both want to have sex and he puts it in the butt with no warning or ask. But when men talk about consent, they talk about the things PRIOR to actual sexual contact. Hence why they find it so difficult because women don't like being asked "Hey, wanna have sex?" Etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:43 PM
–

Congratulation - you're a rapist. First of all, no, I'm not. Jackass. If you bothered to read the next paragraph, I literally stated that when I had that happen to me, I simply kicked her out. Second, I'm sorry, but if I DON'T WANT to do something that somebody else wants me to do, I remove myself entirely from the situation. I don't linger around them, and I certainly don't stay cooped up or god forbid cuddling with them or anything of that nature, specially if it's something to do with my boun…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:40 PM
4

Men get confused because they assume women are always speaking consistently and literally. . There's nothing dubious, vague, or incompatible about these two scenarios Unless... men were taught that female sexual nature wasn't as tied to the physical attractiveness of men as they really were... which loops back to the RP talking points that many women here deny.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:25 PM
0

Most of the problems were when a woman went to his place on a date, and men claimed that she knew what that meant I mean, yeah it's usually an invite to have sex. Don't tell me you are just wanting to get coffee at a random person's apartment at 2am or something. That doesn't mean that it's an all "Ok" sign to have it tho. and even if she said no, he didn't care. Or they don't stop when there is a no, because she already agreed to sex. Or something else, there are hundreds of ways men ignored co…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:21 PM
3

It's like some years ago they talked about consent and how hard it is to navigate Consent has never been "hard" to grasp for men. The problem is that some women HATE when the men they are with, have to keep asking them for the Ok sign. These women want their men to just "get it" instead of bluntly asking, because it does "kill" the vibe. So men have to simultaneously directly ask for consent, but also not ask and just get the subtle hints women do that COULD IMPLY consent. Men get confused becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:12 PM
11

What does that have to do with not wanting women to change hobbies that men enjoy?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 10:16 PM
1

So why do you care about morals if you around ragebaiting and posting troll posts? Is it because you are sadistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:40 PM
2

So is your experience that women who have later told you they had casual sex originally told you they didn’t, so they lied? Either they outwardly did, or lied by omission. Tomato tomato. Or is the issue that they didn’t sleep with you fast enough compared to what you think was the timeline for a previous man? I apply the same standards to the women I date. I don't change them if they are hotter or uglier. I'd like a partner that does the same to her potential dates. That's all. also group sex is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:39 PM
2

You admit redpill doesn’t care about character. For some reason, you don’t see the cause and effect of that. If I place a pencil outside, and somebody picks it up to stab somebody else. That's on them. If I place a pencil outside and somebody starts writing a novel with it, that's on them. Trump got the make youth vote by being on podcasts. Trump got the vote because the common leftist rhetoric was to blame all of societal's problem on men, and white people. Elliot Rodgers used the 80/20 rules a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:31 PM
4

I do wonder how you guys even are getting this information. Are you interrogating women on dates about how quickly they’ve slept with each previous partner? Well, for one, I generally appear to be very open to women. So often times they will tell me that themselves. It might not be on the first date, or the second, but they do eventually. The woman that took the longest to tell me was dating me for 5 months, when she just casually dropped that she regularly slept around and even had a foursome w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:05 PM
3

Dude, popular redpillers get with bimbos and sex workers. Like Fresh and Fit and Andrew Tate. Redpill is about giving men the tools to date what they want. If they wish to date hookers and bimbos that's their prerrogative. I don't date those types of women. If men read the books, and apply what they teach, they will get results. Following social influencers is retarded, especially grifters. I don't even watch any of those fuckers. Fresh and fit were already getting clowned on for years during co…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:50 PM
2

It’s that the redpillers’ mindset funnels them toward people who with low standards and high dysfunction. Except it doesn't. Like I said before. If a redpiller wants to date the hot girl with strict standards, and they are attractive and followed RP's teachings, he will have a BETTER CHANCE to get a date or even possibly enter a relationship with that woman BECAUSE PEOPLE generally give more leeway to attractive people. So in the case that he doesn't live to one of her strict standards, that doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:42 PM
2

I actually didn't read that part. That was my bad. Thought it was something about the references you had made. This problem might also related to the types of women they know. Redpill men complain about women “choosing wrong,” but they can’t even detect wrong unless it comes with a mugshot. That’s why they keep seeing women who dont care about moral standards and never women who do. Do some women generally prefer or completely ignore the massive red flags those guys have? Yes absolutely. But tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:27 PM
0

You entered a conversation that EXPLICITLY was comparing rates of WOMEN KILLING MEN AND MEN KILLING WOMEN, and the COMMENT YOU RESPONDED to EXPLICITLY SPECIFIED DV KILLINGS, because those are the most STRAIGHTFORWARD events of INTER-GENDER violence. You completely tried to skew the conversation away to a completely unrelated topic because you couldn't respond properly to what the conversation had NATURALLY flowed to. But you were annoyed enough to make a response that you thought it would be a "…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:21 PM
5

Social competence starts with accurately identifying what is unacceptable, what is admirable, and what is merely baseline. It's not social competence. It's called Social Values If you can’t detect disrespect, boundary-testing, or antisocial behavior in other men, you won’t detect it in yourself so you’ll keep mislabeling your failures as “women are unreasonable” and “women are liars about caring about morals and good men” instead of “my behavior was off.” Both things can be true. Women do genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:18 PM
7

On the topic of killings in DV situations? Yes. Hence why you pivoted to a completely unrelated topic as mass shootings. But nice attempt at pivoting from the argument the conversation was about. Whataboutism at its finest. Chihuahuas are very territorial and aggressive, but they are seen as cute because they are small and have no force on their bites. If they were the size of a husky or a golden retriever, they would be seen as dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:00 PM
0

She’s gotta get instant lusty vaginal tingles and always want to fuck on command, simultaneously have no history of giving that treatment to any other man It's the consistency that is the issue. If I date a girl that when she is attracted to a guy she still abstains from sex with the guy until she gets to know him better? Sure. All the way. If I date a girl that when she is attracted to a guy she sleeps with him quickly or in a straightforward matter but decides that for me, she "should get me t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:54 PM
3

Closest equivalent is probably lift and lurk. Although he never posts, he constantly tries to ragebait..
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 12:34 PM
7

Lillith can stir up interesting conversations and argue her points, which is more than can be said for most posters. Disagree entirely. Lilith does her best to not willingly engage in discussions. She always manages to railroad criticisms against her by repeatly asking for more and more "sources" or "proofs" to the point it's highly predictable, or she straight up sidesteps the criticism entirely by changing the topic or focusing on the most minute of details that a critic might have gotten wron…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:13 AM
9

Lilith is a well-known ppd poster that often just makes posts deliberately made to antagonize men in general, aka trolling/ragebaiting, but somehow that account is never striked and never banned from posting. It's extremely apparent that the mods know about it. They just allow her to keep posting despite the blatant rule breaks. You can tell what post is a Lilith post because they are the ONLY posts that are only commented by men and her. Women don't engage in any sort of way on her posts, becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:57 AM
13

I actually wasn't ascribing a very deranged worldview about women in this case It's not about how deranged it was. It's the assumption at all that I have an issue with. Not every guy or boy that doesn't like to socialize hopes to find a partner and looks for advice, automatically means that they MUST have an erroneous or fantasy about women. That's the core of the issue when it comes to BP thinking. The "Just World" fallacy in full display. A guy that is struggling is not struggling because he i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:54 PM
10

Hence why I'm not denying what she said, I just take issue with automatically assuming that a guy that doesn't like to socialize MUST HAVE unrealistic expectations or fantasies of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:43 PM
15

They don't take it because it's difficult to enact, slow to yield results, and often requires the sacrifice of some very deeply held fantasies and ideals about women. This directly contradicts: We'll all tell you to change your lifestyle if this isn't the case...the problem is that the people who need this advice are the least likely to take it because they generally don't enjoy socializing that much. A guy can have perfectly normal worldviews when it comes to women, but it matters little if he …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:54 PM
–

Well, technically, the three kings met each other before ever being present for Christ's birth and were from each major continent at the time, so one was from Asia, the other from Europe and the last from Africa.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:32 PM
8

HCOL entails that a high earning salary there has the same purchasing powers as a middle class in a lower cost area. It's not the "benefits" you think it is, and I live in Mass. It's also highly contextual. A woman that lives in an HCOL area will obviously want their man to be earning much higher than the median income there, despite it already having a higher than average median income to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 05:43 AM
16

or most importantly... married or already in a relationship or a majority of the men that earn that much skewing towards old age.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 05:18 AM
7

If the justification for using those insults is just to hurt that person. Then the N word would 100% apply in the same situation even more so because of it's historical context. It's just sexism plain and simple. Sexism against men is permitted in the social lexicon, but racism against a minority is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 12:08 AM
–

Unless you properly went to a nutritionist that evaluated your body type, you wouldn't know how healthy you really are or where your BMI should be. Just because there is a general healthy BMI index for the average woman, that doesn't mean it will apply to you. Same thing goes with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 12:06 AM
12

I agree I just think it's funny how it's only RP guys that get those kinds of insults here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:16 PM
9

Wouldn't that also apply to all the BP and women here?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:42 PM
4

Was your husband medically diagnosed? Or is he riding the quirky mental disability popularity wave like many people do with ADHD? How was he successful? Like actual details. 3. I thought the red pill was about changing your circumstances and adapting to your environment. Instead, all I ever see y'all do is whine and complain about women. Pray tell, if you go to a restaurant are you surprised when you see... people eating? If you go to a library, are you surprised when people... read books? This …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:39 PM
–

So they repeat that pattern. Funny how men don't have that problem This is exactly why women teach each other to be pickier, so they can do better. It’s in women’s best interest to do so. By being pickier on physical requirements that have little to do with the morality of the man in question. Which loops them back on the same.problem over and over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:11 PM
–

why should i as a woman be expected to go out with someone who's not my type You have demonstrated now for the third time your mental incapacity. The guys that you find attractive, generally speaking, most women find attractive, ergo those men are the ones getting multiple offers from women or have little to no resistance GETTING first dates. Meaning that the "bar is in hell" concept applies to THEM, not all men. If you are married with children, I hope your husband or father of your children is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:08 PM
–

I don’t think it’s strange that women are more surprised by that. Men often lie and misrepresent their intentions for sex, then change gears after they get their dick wet. Men admit that here all the time. . "Men lie all the time we all know it" sees that an attractive guy is looking at their general direction and flirts with them The girl sleeps with them, the man curves her and ignores her "Men are all horrible and shitty. Yall suck." sees that an attractive guy is looking at their general dir…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:04 PM
–

? are you retarded? what type of effort do you expect people to put in? You don't seem to have enough mental capacity to understand that you are AGREEING with OP. The bar is in hell for attractive men because these men are the ones that women are WILLING to go on a date with in the first place. Good Lord.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:58 PM
2

what if i never had any issues finding a partner since becoming a legal age? are my standards still unrealistic? Online they are, which is what you were complaining about. Meaning that it is more likely that the men you meet IRL and date, have flaws that you are still willing to overlook compared to reading about their flaws online. i think men should just work to improve their looks and desirability just like we do. Men are going working out now more than ever before. Women work on their looks …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:56 PM
–

It still applies, you know. The standard is in hell for the attractive men. All the guy has to do is clean his nails, but he's attractive so he doesn't even have to put effort to get a date in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:52 PM
–

How is it not the point? You’re acting like it’s bad for women to complain about a bad experience they had. No, I'm saying that women ACTING SURPRISED that the hot, attractive guy that was way more attractive than them treated them like shit and complaining about it is a problem. If men would routine put their hands on a hot stove and go online to complain how all stoves are horrible and burn them, would they be in the right? Of course not. They choose to put their hands on hot stoves. It's thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:50 PM
0

okay, you can have your pick in an all you can eat buffet, but its all foods you dont like at all. be happy, come on, be happy! Again, it's the "don't like at all" that is the issue at hand. It is statistically impossible that you found so few people that you had a moderate interest in unless your standards were so unbelievably unrealistic in the first place. The point is that women get to choose what standards they apply. But if those standards can only be filled by like 1% of the single male p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:47 PM
–

I think it’s fine to be upset if you had a shitty ex. Not the point I was talking about and you know it. A lot more women can’t relate to that. My guy, the entire point is that BOTH genders go through that, but only women loudly complain when attractive men run through them like a hot knife on butter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:42 PM
–

You literally said "another date" Meaning you ALREADY agreed to go out on a date with them in the first place. The point is that women don't think about these sorts of things, with average or unattractive men. They simply act as they don't exist. But when an attractive guy comes along, they immediately agree to a date and then apply their standards depending on how egregious their behavior is after.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:40 PM
0

i did it with all the men and women that seemed nice fun. So you flirt with every guy or girl you meet then? I asked a pretty precise question. Did you act that way with any person that approached you to date or just the ones where you found them attractive enough to date? but, to answer your question, women match out of desperation Lmao. Didn't know that having the opportunity to have your pick of the litter, to choose any food from an all you can eat buffet and still whining about what you cho…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:37 PM
–

Men also put up with more from women they find attractive. And you don't see these men complaining when it bites them back in the ass. Hence why there is ALWAYS the joke of at least one guy commenting on any image depicting a morally questionable or goth/alternative but attractive woman: "She can ruin me." Men know what they get into when they look willingly enter messy relationships with these women. That's the issue. Women love to complain when they put up with the antics of an attractive man …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:32 PM
–

if i see an attractive man with dirty fingernails im not going on another date w him Key word there being: Another
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:29 PM
6

Abbot Elementary had a pretty good joke about this entire issue: https://youtube.com/shorts/DlOt4rG9EVo?si=nJEswHx_uzF4zlHZ The point is, even if women aren't "gold diggers," they still vastly spend LESS money than the men they go out with during those activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:24 PM
1

. i personally always had witty banter when dating, but in most cases i was the one trying to make things playful. Whith ALL of the men have approached you? Or just the ones you found attractive or worthy enough in the first place to engage? That's the crux of the issue that you are not getting. Obviously, if a woman is interested and sexually attracted in a guy who's talking with her, they will do their best to engage and build rapport. But the majority of times, when women match with men, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:22 PM
1

Why even be mad though over not clicking with people who are obviously garbage prospects anyway? Because the men still had to do the song and dance to get to that point anyways. So men tend to put more money and time to get to the initial parts of dating and still have a majority of their time wasted on that kind of person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 03:18 PM
–

An average man can be more or less attractive based on how he presents. It depends. You know this already. True, just like it's true that men doing their best to please the woman they are dating doesn't mean they are regularly sleeping together. In fact, it's often the opposite. Most guys that are in deadbedroom relationships tend to also do most of the house workload, yet it matters little to the women they date. Women routinely state how just because men provide effort, either financial/materi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 02:30 PM
10

Gen Z men are even more jaded than millennial men, and they both drink less/go out less. The "rise" of the red pill in the online space did not happen because of millennial men. It happened because it resonated with younger gen z men. The millennial men just hopped on the train and grifted (profited) out of it online.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 02:03 PM
–

If that were true, soooooo many more men would be getting sex. Because we all know that sexual attraction from women can be negotiated lmao right? No effort. No imagination. Just come to collect sex, attention, service. Said by the same person that scrolls IG all day, spends her time watching Netflix and only thinks about her BF when it comes to wanting something from him. verage women do NOT get treated like models and average men demanding to be treated like Chad are delusional. They get treat…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 01:50 PM
–

Men certainly aren't treating the average woman like models. Isn't the common narrative here even by BP about that topic is that a large majority of men have literally no standards and let women walk all over them at all times, creating the very same problems we talk about? So yeah, they apparently do treat them like models because they apply little to no standards at all to women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 01:04 PM
2

The line about waiting below is an allusion to the classic balcony style scene given the references to windows - she wants him to declare his love. Which means she wants him to court her. Which he doesn't. And in that we find him courting her, he's the devil rolling his dice and she's the angel rolling her eyes at him. Lmfao, that is NOT what she means by that. She's talking about the actual devil and angel on a person's shoulder. The devils play, and they know the person affected will fall for …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 03:34 PM
1

You seem to be viciously agreeing with me. Did you read my comments at all? "There's nothing to debate with." "It is a rant because it does not provide anything substantial to debate..." You are however very triggered by this OP which isn’t even that biting. How is it triggering me when I specifically picked apart each point and pointed out how erroneous those parts were? If anything the fact that you are side-stepping and railroading the conversation with meaningless jabs at me instead of engag…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 09:10 PM
5

I’m highlighting how masculinity interacts with the world around us, including politics. Yet you use the most negative ways to describe those aspects: Self-centeredness What is self-centeredness in the context of society and how "men" interact with it? That men want to be given just as much value from society as they give in? Because it's not a wrong worldview. If I give in 100% of my time to something, I'd expect the returns to be the same. “defense” Of?... Less open to the POV of others No, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:41 PM
8

And what does this have to do with anything? Where's the issue? It's like saying that there are more women on the left than the right because it appeals to them and their worldview. There's nothing to debate. And sure aspects of masculinity might be culturally defined, but many aspects of it are predisposed impulses that are then further exacerbated by culture. I think this is what’s usually happening. What do you mean by this? "Some things may be affected by culture but culture affects them." L…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:23 PM
4

Fever dream high in the quiet of the night You know that I caught it (oh yeah, you're right, I want it) Bad, bad boy, shiny toy with a price You know that I bought it (oh yeah, you're right, I want it) Killing me slow, out the window I'm always waiting for you to be waiting below Devils roll the dice, angels roll their eyes What doesn't kill me makes me want you more And it's new, the shape of your body It's blue, the feeling I've got And it's ooh, whoa-oh It's a cruel summer "It's cool, " that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:01 PM
10

Why does it hurt men’s feelings so much that they have to work harder than Chris Evan’s and Michael b Jordan to get women Because it means that you apply standards arbitrarily to get what you want. Your entire argument hinges on men being traditionally the ones having to lead and to make dates exciting as part of the process, yet here you are justifying how attractive men DON'T HAVE TO do this song and dance, while insulting the men that do point it out in the first place. It's not an insane tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:50 PM
4

Most modern women will offer to pay for at least something in the date, they just don't want to autistically split bills down the middle and have servers make corrections of a few cents to make sure it's 100% even. Don't know what kind of places you normally eat at, but in my experience, when you tell a server to split the bill, it simply means that each seat pays for what they ordered. It's not 50/50 split. It means that if I order a $40 meal, and she orders a $30 meal, I pay $40, and she pays …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:42 PM
3

I just reposnd with: "Oh if you mean if I'm for equality between the genders? Absolutely." That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:43 PM
4

Which loops back to the original point...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 09:41 PM
7

I do. You do understand that the problem doesn't come from men being picky right? The whole point is that a vast majority of women have a height filter, and a large chunk of them straight up just disregard any man below 6 feet. Your advice is non-advixe. Again. Because men aren't all picky. The women that want to date short men are just vastly smaller than the amount of shorter men to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:25 PM
8

If a woman rejects you solely based on height, then it might not be the kind of woman you want to chase after. This is literally saying nothing. The vast majority of women do have a height preference. The standard "My height plus at least 3 inches" is a thing for women "because of heels". Saying "Don't focus on these women" is non-advice. They are already trying to find women that will like them despite their height. They just CAN'T FIND THEM because they are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:09 PM
13

In pill communities, there is constant talk of how 60% of young Gen z men are single and how women are dating older or richer or higher status. Yet, when I leave my house, I see the same familiar sight every day. Men who are less attractive, short, poorly dressed with attractive women. Considering that women tend to vastly over-rate their own attractiveness and their female peers, I'd be willing to bet that it's not as clear cut as you make it. Specially when women tend to artificially inflate t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:03 PM
20

Because the redpill is primarily focused on dating women. Men's right groups do talk about biphobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 12:46 PM
–

Damn, where's that woman that was enraged that a tennis pro didn't think Serena was the best tennis player ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 10:29 AM
-1

And again- I see men complaining about that constantly. If you meant the example you brought up, I just showed you an article referencing two studies on the subject, PROVING that women that do enter marriage LOWER their LIBIDO and KEEP LOWERING IT as they approach the 5 marriage year mark. In a vacuum, men that do complain about their wives wanting less sex after getting married, is a fact backed by science.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:50 PM
3

There are Some Professional Female Marathon Runners who can run a sub 2:20 Marathon. TBF Marathons or any kind of endurance-running focused sport, women do have the advantage, due to needing less calories and having significantly less upper muscle density, so they can go on for longer. Same reason why the gap between men and women competing in swimming events closes as you increase the distance of the events. Women have better buoyancy, so they require less energy to keep themselves afloat in wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:47 PM
1

Point it out so I can laugh at him too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:45 PM
-1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cultural-animal/202201/how-sexual-desire-changes-after-marriage First article that I searched on the subject. So at least in a vacuum, women do tend to want less sex after getting married and the rate keeps lowering as they approach the 5 year marriage mark. So at least in that case, it's not a case of a guy knowingly entering a marriage with a woman that had already proved by behavior, that she had a low libido, but rather their libido does start to decli…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:41 PM
–

What does your incoherent rant have to do with what I said? I simply stated that the equivalent of a guy playing video games, would be a woman watching netflix all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:37 PM
-1

Men and women are both guilty of marrying people for the future version of them that they conjure up in their minds as opposed to marrying them as they are. The difference between the two is that men don't go out in public and then state how "deceived" they were and how she was literally the "perfect" girl while having more blatant red flags than a chinese communist party. Hell, there's a reason why a big meme said to any hot but questionable woman is: "She can ruin me." Men are self-aware when …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:36 PM
1

Is there something in your world that is a fault of men? The entitlement of women is certainly a fault of the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:33 PM
–

The equivalency for girls might be Tiktok and shopping. No, it would be watching netflix all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:18 PM
–

Learning a language is code for foreign accent. So it's like a kink thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:17 PM
–

In one study, video games were the least attractive. In the other, manosphere was the least attractive. Not surprising in the slightest. When women think about a guy playing video games, they think of the basement dweler that never goes out. When women think about a guy that is in the manosphere they picture a self-absorbed manlet with a misogynistic attitude that only uses the word "females" to refer to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:15 PM
11

It's a boring answer, but honestly, it’s a lot more sustainable than the crazy expectations people post about on here. Same boat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:13 PM
4

Also, how male professional athletes perform says nothing about every other man and just because he can beat Serena doesn't mean YOU could. But we are not talking about every woman and every man... we are talking about the pro athletes that are PAID to compete against one another... Serena and most of the women who play professional tennis would kick your ass in a match Who is saying that they could beat Serena in a match in this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:08 PM
14

Like couldn’t he have just said the men’s and women’s tennis games are “different”? He was specifically asked "If she was the greatest tennis player ever." and explained that she was the greatest female player ever. He literally acknowledged how "different" the male and female division is without putting Serena down. The interviewer forced him to explain why she wasn't "just" the greatest tennis player. He didn’t have to explain that men are better and that women wouldn’t perform as well if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:04 PM
–

Girl, you have half of my reddit karma, and you made your account in 2024. If anybody here has no life. It's you. Glass houses and all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:16 AM
2

Pattern recognition from watching women behave around men they are attracted to, and those they are not attracted to. Same as always.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:03 PM
7

She’s not antagonizing anyone. She deliberaly antagonizes men in her posts. What are you on about? Why are you bending so hard against something that most regular members know that is true. There is a reason why every other debate post made here has almost a 50/50 split between the genders yet in her posts, the only people that comment are the ragebaited men and her. Women don't contribute anything to her posts. Why? Because they are made with the intent to ragebait men. You literally described …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:57 PM
4

Which by mentioning what they desire, they... INVITE men to act that way onto her, even if she is not attracted to the men in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:47 PM
2

... and yet one is accepted, and one isn't... how convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:46 PM
4

“Bait” isn’t trolling. It’s just low hanging fruit. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/troll troll verb trolled; trolling; trolls transitive verb a: to antagonize (others) online by deliberately posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content … trolls engage in the most outrageous and offensive behaviors possible—all the better to troll you with.— Whitney Phillips b: to act as a troll (see troll entry 3 sense 1) on (a forum, site, etc.) … is also notor…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:44 PM
8

They aren’t in romcoms anymore because they’d hit too close to home, and we can’t unsee the problematic behavior as a culture. Maybe in hollywood, but that's not where women flock for Romance movies or tv-shows. They look at K-dramas for that, where the trope is not just present, but it's almost universally ever present in every single show or movie dealing with romance. What conclusions are you drawing from that? Because a lot of times when guys bring this up, it sounds like they think women se…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:36 PM
3

Is there an aversion to men going celibate? Alot of issues would be solved if men went sexless Trust me, if I had a wish that could be granted, I would wish for men's sexual drives to be even lower than women. The economy would tank by itself if all men collectively decided to not try as hard for a white picket fence dream to settle down with and just had a small cozy apartment where they do their own thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:22 PM
4

The issue is i didn't ask for it and that seems like switching the topic. I'm not tho. I did not deny nor dimiss the ideas that you made. Women DO complain about all of those issues on the men they are with. I simply provided an explanation that the kind of men that are willing to provide better treatment for women, are simply not being chosen. I tell you how, it's not, but you can't stand when men are to blame so you shift the blame on women for...men's actions. I literally was one of the few T…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:20 PM
3

A word that was often used in the old days to explain to other TRP men how women act that does not seem to get used much anymore is "biotruths". Which is because...? Because posts that end up on that type of conclusions, would be teethering on breaking rules like, number 7, number 3 or number 11. and would also break some of the guidelines of this sub, specifically, number 5, number 8 and number 14. Which again, begs the question of why she is allowed to repeatedly violate not only the "no troll…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:09 PM
1

If negative posts about men are considered trolling, then negative posts about women would also be considered trolling, and this sub, which was founded to debate TRP's negative views about women, would not exist. The difference between what Lilith usually posts and TRP posts that go along the same lines but for women, is that TRP posts have to go out of their own way to not simply land on the conclusion of: "Women are irrational because they are women and women are stupid." or have to specifical…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:00 PM
4

That's basics of courtship, if a man asks a woman out he pays and she says thank you- that's it. Which is why it's entirely reasonable for men to put less effort. In your example, the guy should have taken her to a coffee shop or out for ice cream or a walk in the park, etc. Having to work for potentially hours, in order to afford a basic mid-tier dinner date, having to approach the women, risk humiliation or rejection,and then having to do the metaphorical clown dance, just to keep her interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:56 PM
3

"men like doing things for women"....so that's why women constantly talk about shit gifts, about lack of effort on christmas and 0 gifts for a woman, weaponized incompetence, no flowers, and also why men scream gold digger for any reason they want? Simplest, but hand-wavy explanation is that the men that get into these relationships are not the kind that actually want to treat women good. So it would be up to the women to vet better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:50 PM
4

Her topics are the female equivalent of the “women are incapable of being rational!” dudes. And yet those types of posts get immediately taken down. Yeah because she’s intentionally triggering insecure men into taking her bait. Which again begs the question why the mods haven't banned her for repeatedly violating rule number 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:43 PM
19

On an anonymous web forum like Reddit the advice is always going to be somewhat generic because we don’t know the OP personally. As if most of the advice people give outside of social media is not exactly the same: "Don't try too hard." "The one will come, just be patient." "You are perfect the way you are."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:43 PM
14

If you respected ethical boundaries, then you shouldn’t feel bad if one person took offense to you asking if she wants to dance. Often times, it's not that the men get offended, it's that the women that react to that, do so very publicly and loudly to humiliate the man in question... they weaponize their immediate public environment to attack the man, even if the man did everything "ethically" right. 3: Media depicts “guys who don’t take no for an answer,” as romantic leads. The takeaway for guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:34 PM
6

But saying “I like X trait in a man” isn’t “begging” for anything. "Begging" might now be the right term, but the word "invites" is certainly appropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:32 PM
40

Most men have no problem with direct confrontation and saying the things outloud. Many do, but as they later learn in life, it's just not worth it sometimes. I remember how I was criticized by my friends that were women, after I told them that I had caught an girlfriend trying to cheat. I simply texted her that we were over, to not contact me again, and blocked her ass. I gave her no explanation, no reasoning, nothing. My friends were telling me that I was an asshole because I didn't have a conv…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:22 PM
–

???? What made-up numbers are you talking about? Not only are you incapable of understanding what the words "reciprocal" and "non-reciprocal" means when it comes to domestic violence, but somehow you are so illiterate that you cannot understand that my reply was meant to DUMB DOWN the quoted source you smugly and ignorantly thought proved your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:19 AM
4

When both partners hit each other, 49% of cases. When one partner hits, women were the abuser in 70% of cases... You need to read better...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:48 AM
9

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/brock-bullies-sex-1.4487053 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283732665_How_Alluring_Are_Dark_Personalities_The_Dark_Triad_and_Attractiveness_in_Speed_Dating https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds-men-nice-women-not-other-way-around-261269 https://www.spring.org.uk/2017/12/quality-women-more-attractive.php https://www.researchgate.n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 05:59 AM
3

You must be very old if you don't get that meme. It's a joke about being one of millions of women with the same tastes and claiming it's unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 04:36 AM
–

All women are Queens and drop-dead gorgeous!!!! /s do you deep within you know that you are not that beautiful but say that to appear beautiful or is it something you actually believe that you are beautiful maybe due to external reasons like friends, family, etc. You must know what I am talking about. It's all about optics. Women love to defend one another and delude themselves. If you really want to know what they think, show them a picture of a woman that is clearly unattractive/fat, ask them …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:44 AM
9

Let's see those studies saying that women prefer selfish men. Studies, implies multiple, aka more than one. Gave you multiple studies in case you tried to dismiss some of them. I went further than what I was required to do in this conversation. Yet here you are, not even doing the bare minimum after supposedly "wanting to see those studies". first 3 talk about being a lying psychopaths, not what we were discussing, at all. You either have veeeery low intelligence overall or you are being intenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:35 AM
8

but in your example you are mad that men are held to a "boys don't cry" standard. You are mixing everything up. Men are held to a concept of them being adults. Women don't. Being an adult is acting like one. You don't get to cry just because you are mildly stressed, then have the world around you bend to your whims and help you out. That's what young children experience. Women want to be adults, when it suits them, if it doesn't suit them, they revert to being children, in which case they are tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:28 AM
11

???? I posted MULTIPLE studies indicating along the lines of the same conclusions. It's your job to read them out. The lazy person here is you. You wanted multiple studies about the topic, and their conclusions. I gave you some. Your job is at the very least read the damn abstract. You don't get to dimiss them simply because "Too long don't like to read. Give me a summery of multiple studies all researching a multifaceted problem in which all have to land on the same very small conclusion becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:25 AM
6

Is that flip-flop happening online? No. The majority of times happens in real life as well. It's not ragebait. Women do operate in that way. When a woman breaks down crying at work because she's stressed and everybody flocks to cuddle her and help her, yet if a man were to break down in the same way for the same reason, a majority of them would make fun of that man. When it is socially acceptable for a woman to physically abuse their male partner out in public without having a bystander intervin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:16 AM
2

I believe the claim is "most women ..." Are you suggesting most women want to kill all men? First of all, if you are going to make a claim of what I wrote, at least do it properly: The common sentiment of "Kill all men." "Men are trash." "I choose the bear." "Men are pigs." "Men don't deserve anything." that is prevalent in our society, not just the online space, is more than ample evidence of such dehumanizing behavior stemming from women. "Kill all men" is a hyperbolic statement in itself, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:10 AM
9

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/brock-bullies-sex-1.4487053 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704915613909 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283732665_How_Alluring_Are_Dark_Personalities_The_Dark_Triad_and_Attractiveness_in_Speed_Dating https://www.newsweek.com/study-finds-men-nice-women-not-other-way-around-261269 https://www.spring.org.uk/2017/12/quality-women-more-attractive.php https://www.researchgate.n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:00 AM
6

However- women being hostile to men hurts their feelings; men's hostility to women, in contrast, is frequently deadly The absolute irony of dismissing how dehumanizing behavior is commonly accepted and justified when it's done to men, and then actively proving how people justify said dehumanization of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:53 AM
8

Have you considered that some women are assholes too? And some guys are liars? Both of those things are not mutually exclusive. That has nothing to do with the argument I made. If a minority of women where the ones that primarily selected that way, it would show up on studies and surveys made on the matter. But the opposite is correct. A majority of women find selfish men more attractive than unselfish men. Yes, some men lie. Some men lie very well. The majority of men don't lie or fake it that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:51 AM
8

I have seen no real evidence to suggest that "most women don't treat men like humans." Can you provide examples of dehumanizing behavior perpetrated by women on men on any sort of a scale? The common sentiment of "Kill all men." "Men are trash." "I choose the bear." "Men are pigs." "Men don't deserve anything." that is prevalent in our society, not just the online space, is more than ample evidence of such dehumanizing behavior stemming from women. If a woman is actively hostile to men, or has a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:42 AM
4

While I cannot promise someone will fuck you for putting my suggestions into practice, your friendships and work relationships will improve significantly-- and at least you will stop actively alienating people who may consider fucking you. It's hilarious how stupid her argument is. Does she not realize that the majority of men have gripes with the way women flip-flop between "being a independent person" and "i'm just a wittle baby don't hold me accountable" attitude that is fairly common in soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:35 AM
8

That's awful bro. I hope things get better for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:28 AM
5

Anyway seems like she is specifically targeting tall, lean, self sufficient stem men. https://media.tenor.com/R4bqdpchzfoAAAAM/buzz-lightyear-factory.gif She's targeting the same men that every other woman wants with maybe less than 5% of men having at least two of those requirements and that's without even secluding SINGLE and AGF appropriate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:22 AM
7

Women like the confident guy who helps at the animal shelter and is sensitive and caring The issue is that women put more importance on confidence itself, rather than WHERE that confidence is used on or by. Meaning a large chunk of women would find a guy that is an asshole and confident attractive compared to a guy who is not confident, is nice and works at an animal shelter. Being nice, or being pleasant is not a hard requirement, it's just a plus. It's conditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:18 AM
19

Who cares that sexually selecting for men like that is asking for a world of hurt?? Their argument is the opposite of that tho... Their argument is that women, particularly the younger they are, tend to self-select the assholes, the ones that display more outwardly selfish/sociopathic traits, which potentially leads to the men who do not display those traits, either because of their born-nature or were socially influenced to behave differently, to change the way they behave in order to become mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 12:11 AM
0

Not all crimes work like that. With rape it’s a recent culture shift, people tend to follow previous norms a lot. The majority of men that are between the ages of 16 to 45 have all lived after that culture shift. Meaning most of them never actually even knew that it was more "acceptable" to rape women. It's a complete nothingburger argument. You cannot tell me that men that are of military age right now rape just as much as men did so in the 1960s or even before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:49 PM
-1

Nope. If this was true there would be more conclusive data. Of? What? A man getting accused of rape? That happens all the time. I'm not talking about a man getting falsely accused. I'm talking about a victim pointing at a man and accusing them of SA. That happens all the time, and the world, quickly knows about it. And you know he was falsely accused how exactly? Because the guy had proof that the time where he had supposedly committed the act on the victim, he was in his own dorm, streaming him…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:44 PM
1

Honestly at this point men are more scared to be accused of rape than actually raping. True so far... I think it's because rape is okay, but being accused brings consequences for him. they don't see causation link. What. The. Fuck. is this gynocentrism and misandrist bullshit? Most men are more scared of being accused of sexually assaulting a woman than actually committing the crime, BECAUSE a MAJORITY OF MEN don't even think of committing the crime in the first place. For a man to sexually assa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:33 PM
1

Yet so many of you know people who have been falsely accused. Because often times when the guy is accused, the public knows about it and it blows up? Like how is that so hard to understand? Yeah, I knew a guy who lived on my floor who was accused of SA in my uni. His entire life was blown up, he became a social pariah and was kicked out of school, even before the law got officially involved. He had to go to the authorities himself in order to get a proper investigation outside of the college ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:27 PM
1

The law often can’t assign clear responsibility in those cases, the situation simply doesn’t fit neatly into criminal categories. That's where you are wrong, because in many parts of the world, the legal definition of rape is simply to specifically includes "To penetrate somebody". Which means that even in those situations where both people equally could not consent, the man is the one who is going to be treated as a criminal if the law gets involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:24 PM
2

Apparently not, since it was not "malicious" with the intent to cause direct harm, but rather it's the tale of plausible deniability. I did not want to harm that person, but it just so happened that what I did harmed him.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:21 PM
9

Why are people obligated to believe that men can be evil enough to rape, but women could never be evil enough to lie? Specially when it's far easier to lie than it is to forcibly perform a physical act on somebody else, regardless of criminal consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:18 PM
24

There's a reason why when somebody mentions the way women and modern society apply the "Just World" fallacy when it comes to unsuccessful men, no BP responds back to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:57 PM
1

Uh no. Red Pill is more about just getting into a relationship. Have you read the books at all? If red pill was all about just getting women to sleep with you it would just be PUA. Which is why so much of the essential reading list criticizes PUA and diverts from it. Like a simple concept that directly shuts your argument down from the red pill is the Dread Game. Dread game is used when you are generally in a relationship with a woman, and they begin to treat sex like a chip or start to constant…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:55 PM
-1

Do you think women collectively use sex against men? I mean... yes? They do. But not completely. Like women do often treat sex as a reward for men and lack of sex as punishment. But does it happen literally all the time? No. It just depends on the context. Why do you think women don't have sex with you if they want it too? In this very specific scenario, of her wanting to have sex with a guy, but not being able to, it would probably be along the lines of: Work - Responsibilities Super Tired Cram…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:43 PM
5

That their initial aloofness is mostly self preservation, and that there's no malice on screening. TBF when it comes to inital dates, absolutely you are correct. But women do use sex as a bargaining chip sometimes. It just all depends on the context.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:40 PM
–

it's actually culturally shamed and stigmatized to get used for sex. Not really. At least not directly. If a woman comes out and says that the guy she was dating ghosted her after having sex, she doesn't get fun off because she was used for it. She gets fun off when context comes out and states that the guy was already flaky or a fuckboi, or even insanely more attractive than she was, so in that case the response is: "Well what did you expect?" But without further context, that's doesn't really …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:26 PM
–

Even women in this sub See, now I truly believe that you are not naive, you are simply being deliberately obtuse and strawmaning me. What do you think the word "EVEN" in that sentence means or implies? It implies that JUST LIKE IN THE REAL WORLD, women here who are more attentive of the gender dynamics JUSTIFY and STATE those same rationalizations done by women in the outside world.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:14 PM
1

https://youtu.be/VNJN1aV8YWI?si=2Oj9IWCqBEyOo9Xe&t=60
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:10 PM
–

Sounds terrifying. I’m glad the outside world I live in doesn’t sound like your outside world. I don’t think I’ve ever met a man OR woman who played this stupid “lemme try trading sex/money for relationships” in the first place. Then you are either naive or not very attentive. Even women in this sub have stated multiple times how men dropping a lot of money on their dates does not mean those men are entitled to sex, and any variations along those lines. But I am still very firmly on the “people …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:04 PM
–

I would too, on both situations. But we are not talking about people in this sub and how we should behave, we are talking about normal people outside, and how they react and judge those situations. In that case, what I said is generally true, it's far easier and far more acceptable to state that a woman has been used for sex, than a man being used for his money without mountains of criticisms or justifications landing his way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:01 PM
–

I have my dude. But again, this sub is a microcosm of a group of people already well versed, or at least more particularly attentive of the gender dynamics of society in the western world. We are talking about a very small diminutive group, which does not reflect how most people behave outside of our group. Which is why in the outside world, one is vilified, and the other is accepted. That's what I and what most people here that are responding to you, are also stating. It's simply the case that …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:58 PM
–

TBF the problem here, like most issues brought up in this sub, is that one is accepted and one is vilified. It's accepted when a woman states that somebody used them to have sex. But it's made fun off when a man says that a woman used him for his money. We can say that both are allowed to feel the way they want to feel, but the truth of the matter is that people weighing-in on the situation will almost always mock the guy and defend the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:43 PM
–

We are currently going back to the thin thing. No we aren't. We are right in the middle of the two if anything. Don't be morbidly obese, don't be starving yourself to the point you have more bones than muscle mass. And I feel like women are just tired. Fat acceptance was about women being represented in fashion. Women were represented in fashion. Fat acceptance was a way to normalize being morbidly obese, and of course, it's only for women, men still have to adhere to their more strict beauty st…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:20 AM
–

Posts like this is why I believe there should be an age restriction on black pill type content. You got a guy who's 18 years old and he's asking for advice how to fix his looks so he doesn't end up alone like the 30 year old men he sees online. My guy, even the top comments are calling the user out. He's 100% looking for attention and compliments. He knows he's attractive. He's acting exactly like most of the female submitters of /r/ roastme did. Like that one girl that was fishing for complimen…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:26 AM
–

Checking the user out, she seems to be a lesbian. Not sure why she's in the 4b subreddit, but she's 100% into women. Also has lifelong medical issues, and apparently multiple events that has caused her PTSD.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:21 AM
–

Time to abandon this phone lol ? You have a burner for reddit? What.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:18 AM
1

I was waiting for a mod to comment, cuz I have a question. What constitutes a troll, or troll behavior for you guys? What breaks rule number 3 of the core rules?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 03:52 AM
–

Lilith, the wookie and the lift guy are 100% trolls. It's just that for some reason, they don't get perma banned despite engaging in obvious trolling behavior. But if you mention it, you get strikes by the mods for witch hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:25 PM
3

Ultimately, there is nothing wrong with putting attractive traits first, men also does that. The problem is doing so while , in the same time: -claiming that you are looking for the opposite and shapping a narrative that basicaly say that personality is the main selector (the good old "if you're incel, then this might be something about your personality" fallacy) He clearly outlined the difference between both genders in his comment. If you bothered to read it instead of typing a generic respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:17 AM
3

I am almost almost sure that women who say they prefer "dadbods" or chubby guys are chubby/fat themselves and only have this preference to protect their own egos. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GvHMNn7XwAAa_Um?format=png&name=900x900
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:28 AM
3

We do that for ourselves. Classic. So why do you judge men as insecure for using shoe lifts? Sweetie, they aren't doing it for you or other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:26 AM
2

On the other hand, thats false advertisement and reeks of insecurity Like...make-up, push-up bras, shape wear do for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:25 AM
2

Except men don’t lie about this, that’s the difference. Men will openly say they’ll put up with a certain amount of downsides if a woman is hot enough or if the sex is good enough. Hence the "She can ruin me." meme that commonly gets commented on any post regarding a questionable but attractive woman, or any woman slightly related to the goth/alternative scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:21 AM
5

These are online echo chamber behaviors not widespread actual behaviors t fundamentally isn't true that most women think men who don't want to date fat women are bigoted BS. Nobody outside of the internet will ever openly state such, unless they werent in the vicinity of only close friends. Women don't think men should dehumanize and degrade fat women, which men seem keen to do to obese women for existing Look at the comments on an obese woman on instagram, the men are degrading her, if men left…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:00 AM
9

watching ramsay make some hamburgers with a girl I'm dating on a Saturday midday, bored out of my mind. "that burger reminds me of the burger a guy made me after I slept with him and his friends" had to act as if that didn't faze me at all excused myself to go buy some ingredients to the grocery store cuz I was hungry sat parked inside the parking lot of the grocery store for half an hour trying to comprehend why the fuck did she say that then, let alone do it in the first place True story.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:14 PM
–

If only lift and the wookie could read. They would be very upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:09 PM
5

I assume all women I date have had sexual partners before me. I don't care unless, they were cheating, helping cheat, or where still having sex with them while dating me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:06 PM
6

And it's a given that eventually women will mention them anyways. I've had women I dated tell me about their old sexual partners completely unprompted.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:01 PM
0

Or just literally talk to her?? What are you talking about? My guy, the entire argument is that there is no magical way to tell when a girl is open to being approached without approaching them in the first place. So the idea that men should be able to "tell" when women are interested in being approached BEFORE bothering them is asinine. That's the entire point. It's obvious the guy should approach. The problem is that you have people even here, arguing that men need to be mind readers in order t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:04 AM
-3

In that situation, yeah. You kinda do. Both times she went to the club, one wanted to get hit on, one didn't. Unless you hover over her for a good while before approaching, you have no way to tell it she's receptive to getting hit on, and even then, you still end up like the creepy guy for hovering over her before approaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:58 PM
14

Except nice guys is also used to refer to guys that were friendly with women, get rejected and then just drift away/stop talking to the specific woman.| Which is the primary way people even here refer to nice guys lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:50 PM
9

Most women I know love when men sensually make out. Yeah, the same as men when they watch 2 women making out, but ask them if they would make out with a guy that sleeps with men and the phobias appear.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:09 AM
16

You've never gotten a bad feeling from someone that turned out to be right? Gotten a feeling that you shouldn't trust a person for a reason you can't put your finger on? TBF, most people can. Men can tell when another man is a sleazeball/fuckboi almost immediately as they appear in the vicinity, it's simply the case that even when these men make it as obvious as possible, as long as he is attractive, women won't care. So women can claim to have a toxic radar all they want, but a majority of time…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:54 AM
1

How am I delusional again?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:31 PM
13

No, incel is not a state of mind, that's an obfuscation of the term. You can state that some of the men that self-describe themselves as "incels" aren't really that because of their unattractiveness, but because of their mentality, but that's still not the same as stating that the term "incel" is a belief or state of mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:21 AM
3

Yeah... Like, This happened to me when I had my "glow up". I used to hang out with a group of women when I entered college, to better get to know women in general. I was fat and meek at the time, so I was a non-issue for them and they happily let me hang out. I remember how this particular woman, who was overweight, used to absolutely trash any man that was overweight, god forbid the ones that would approach her. She used to be VILE to these men. I thought that she was cute before I actually got…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:04 AM
2

Can you blame them? I've never experienced women hosting a general party or a sorority having a fun party, that was ALWAYS the domain of the men. In fact most women's housing was basically off limits to men so women were free to come and trash men's places So it's the fault of the women... so yeah, they can definitely blame themselves for it lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:47 AM
1

I think the point they are trying to make, is that if you saw your friend suffering or being hurt by it, why continue to keep the friendship? Why not simply cut off the friendship for their sake, even if they themselves wouldn't want to?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:36 AM
1

According to red pill males, average women are constantly getting dms and compliments from men on insta, getting free meals from men on a regular basis, getting approached by men irl on the daily etc. It's less specific than that tho. It's simply that the average woman is considered more "passable" or "attractive" to a large subset of men, than it is for the average man to be "passable" or "attractive" to a large subset of women. So obviously as you look at the averages, women tend to have more …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:31 AM
4

They like to pretend they are the experts and somehow anytime i ask something like what they can offer that would be attractive i get incoherent responses. So much for obsessing over women to not know what they like if asked bluntly. Be fit, confident yet not overbearing, have a good paying job, have hobbies outside of video-games or watching netflix all day, don't try to actively argue with women on concepts, specially dating woes, just nod and agree then dismiss the topic. There, that is enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:27 AM
2

Nobody is saying that you should care about men laughing at your delusional standards, or that you should change them to appease the men laughing at you... It's simply that it's funny to see how delusional some people are. There's nothing else to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:19 AM
7

Who said that reasonable_mouse789 was trying to get these women to date him?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:18 AM
14

Except you know... the women that go online and state exactly how delusional their standards are while complaining that no man is enough for them...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:16 AM
2

A predominantly female uni will simply just be much better for the late 20s early 30s dudes in that area NOT attending the uni. What's pretty funny about this is that according to studies made on the subject, women entering college are actually starting to AVOID female-majority colleges. So take that grain of salt how you will...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:15 AM
20

Hm, no. Attractive men can be picky if they so wished, but most of them are not. If attractive men were as picky as the average women, they wouldn't be sleeping with average women in droves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:11 AM
21

I’m starting to realize that my non-incel boyfriend sometimes slips into red-pill-ish mindset. Can women stop using the incel term incorrectly? Incel means involuntarily celibate. Of course a guy that has a fucking girlfriend is not an incel. "I'm starting to realize my boyfriend sometimes slips into a red-pill-ish mindset." There. Fixed it for you. I guess I'm surprised he hasn't reconsidered those ideas, given our long-term relationship, the fact that we love each other, and that I stayed with…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 11:37 PM
–

You think it’s the opposite yet insist this quote you can’t disprove is mine because you can’t search YouTube comments? Whether or not you created the quote is not the problem nor the concern. Is how you REPEATEDLY lied about the origin of the quote. Now it's the youtube comments. 3 months ago, it was your hookup feminist buddy who said the quote. Before that, it was just another poster on PPD. What's the next origin story gonna be? Buddy making up more origins for a quote than the entire comic-…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:16 PM
–

No, if anything it's the opposite I think it's opposite of that. You come across as much dumber and insecure than you try to not be. And I don't need to keep telling people anything. The record is there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:08 PM
–

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1m2cj40/comment/n3omzed/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:04 PM
–

If there's one person here who has been confirmed to have been lying about shit like that has been you, my dude. Something something glass houses...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 01:56 PM
–

But that’s making whole ass relationship be about nothing but looks and leagues, that’s not how relationships work. My girl. The original tiktok only evaluated those relationships by ONE metric and ONE metric ONLY. How looksmatched they are. Obviously then, the people that criticize such a post would criticize it based on its merits. In this case, the original post's notions that the men and women there are equally looksmatched. How the F did you miss the obvious? “these people aren’t in the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:43 PM
3

would treat these girls any better lol why are they mad? because they can't abuse and settle for these women? The post you linked is critiquing the assertion the original tiktok post made, tho. Has nothing to do with how they personally would treat the women. If somebody told me. "Hey, these two people are equally attractive." and showed me the first two pictures that post linked. I'd genuinely laugh. The men are 100% better looking than the women they are dating (in the first 2 pictures) and he…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:21 PM
3

https://i.imgur.com/A1GIavN.png
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:11 PM
2

You have a very warped sense of reality if you truly believe that most men do those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 12:04 PM
1

even tho gen z can have cas sex there is still some stigma around it. "for the street" and body count discussions are a thing with some gen z men, regarding women. Most people like eating pizza. Most people wouldn't date a person who gorges themselves on pizza every day of the week.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 11:48 AM
–

“Evoking raw sexual attraction” is not the same thing as “being open to the idea of getting sexually closer to you, however small that might be.” Yes, those were your words. When somebody evokes raw sexual attraction, AKA they are physically attractive, it means that almost every single person that looks at them, THINK about the idea of potentially sleeping with them. Whether that means getting your genitals instantly hard or wet is up for discussion. But emanating raw sexual attraction means ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 06:55 AM
–

the primary trigger for female sexual attraction is also false. By the literal definition, being physically attractive means that you evoke raw sexual attraction towards the opposite gender. Meaning if a person finds you physically attractive, then it is because either they are open to the idea of getting sexually closer to you, however small that may be, or THINK other people would. If you don't feel like somebody as physically attractive, it means that the thought of sex with that person has n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 06:30 AM
1

Because it's a bad faith deflection. Nobody is arguing for "historical guilt." Historical guilt, in this context is literally a man getting accused online by a random person, and then using that unsubsidized claim to place guilt upon them every time their name comes up. There's not a single informal fallacy, it's a category of fallacies, and you have failed to identify which one I'm supposedly committing by asking you to back up your claim. It's called an argument from ignorance. That is true of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:06 AM
3

I never said a word about "historical guilt." ... That's what the person you replied to said... which you deliberately ignored or never actually read... which makes sense as to why you thought I was only referring to you when it mentioned both terms to set the context of the entire debate... Again, this is just people having opinions. People's opinions are not bound to court rulings. The whole point of this post is how public accusations without merit and without following legal proceedings can …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:00 AM
2

I ended my comment with this statement for a reason: There are outside factors that haven't been properly researched/studied that could impact how men settle for less time with their children. You must have not read it. Because I'm not hand waving the original answer away, simply said that there could be more things that a simple "they don't want to". whcih IME is a rather big one. The entire point of my comment, is that men's reasons for wanting less time with their children in divorces, haven'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:56 AM
2

BUT you are also ignoring a big "outside factor" here - they simply don't want it. I'm not ignoring an "outside factor" if the subject in question IS the MAIN answer used to explain the subject at hand my guy. I simply provided POSSIBLE other factors that could explain the discrepancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:28 AM
5

What legal standard do you imagine has changed? Nice underhanded tactic btw. Slipping that specific tidbit to change the entire context. I think most people here are implicitly referring to the cases where a man gets falsely accused, and gets his name/identity dragged through the mud in the process of clearing his name, which will likely never truly be cleared, since that stain will remain on his social status, whether local or familial or even professional. So in the context of "the second the …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:46 AM
0

I'd think it's 50/50, aka it happens to both and largely depends on the social culture of where the individuals live.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:42 AM
9

By your admission, the only thing she is being charged with is trying to provide proof of what she presumed was sexual assault No, she is being charged with DISTRIBUTING that video online. Again, I literally told you that 20 days ago. But you are still incapable of comprehending basic logic. She posted the video online on tiktok. That is her crime. If she had just went to the police with the video, and WAITED to see what they investigated, alongside DoorDash, this wouldn't have happened. But ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:19 AM
13

A DoorDash delivery driver in New York has been charged with two felonies for whipping out her cellphone and filming a TikTok of a half-naked customer who was "incapacitated and unconscious on his couch due to alcohol consumption," according to police... Authorities allege that the video, "along with the subsequent investigation," indicated that the man was "incapacitated and unconscious on his couch due to alcohol consumption" and Henderson captured the footage "from the exterior" of the victim…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 01:56 AM
1

Is that a Viktor reference?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 01:50 AM
3

A couple of ways the trend happens imo: Legal divorce proceedings take months to deal with, and sure, everybody roughly knows what happens after the divorce, but what about during? Usually, the woman stays in the same house with the kids, and the man moves out to a smaller apartment. This restricts the available space to keep children sometimes. Even at 50/50. Lawyers do put the argument that even moving to an apartment or commuting could uproot the children's lives, and negatively affect them. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:32 PM
3

Demand is just a more strongly worded Expectation, at least that's the way I'm using the terms here. Like no youre sorry about what? Just an expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 04:26 PM
2

They didn't, though. Nobody in this thread demanded it. distinction without a difference. See below: Men always want rewards and pats on the head for being a basically decent human being. . Uh yeah dude, the fact that you're outraged that terrified women didn't shower someone with praise and not the fact that they were terrorized in the first place is the whole point. Yeah. You are incredibly dumb. Showering somebody with praise is not the same as saying a simple thank you. Why yes, they must ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 11:29 AM
3

They EXPECTED men to put their lives on the line. That's why they were so hellbent on stating that men having the audacity to expect even a simple "Thank You" from saving and protecting women, is something that is wrong, and shouldn't even be done. That what the man did should be expected and should not be rewarded. women ran away from a man who tried to assault them rather than fawning over the man who protected them, though. You must be dumb, because never did I state they ran away from the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 11:17 AM
5

A) the extent to which guys here believe that feminists and progressives expect men to put their lives on the line for strangers is so exaggerated that it's almost comical. If the responses made by women to this comment I made on the same situation is any indication, they absolutely do think it's highly expected for men to put their lives on the line for them lmfao: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/Qh3sov4m3z
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 05:16 AM
4

Are you really this disingenuous? The minotaur is not described as a grotesque amalgamation. It is described as extremely handsome in the book. Geniunely seek a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:13 PM
9

One of the top selling romance novels right now is Morning Glory Milking Farm. Do you think those minotaurs are physically attractive to women? Ah yes, the mythical 10 feet hunk half man with fur on his skin, luscious muscles, wavy long hair, throbbing humongous Cock that the main character has to milk out to collect his semen all the while having a deep voice that literally makes the MC wet at times, which she rewiterates constantly how he's so far above her league. How commanding and stern the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:06 PM
19

We were conditioned to believe that if a manreally desires us, he will pine for us. Yearn for us. Go through great lengths to demonstrate his undying devotion and obsession over us. See Disney, Hallmark movies, romance novels, etc It's funny how this is all in the context of: "and he's attractive." Nobody is mentioning shit or referring to what you said to unattractive dudes that obsess over a woman. Apply the same standards that you have for unattractive men to abusive men, and you will have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 08:14 AM
14

Yeah, studies and trends show that if given a choice, the majority of women either date on the same financial bracket or up. So you don't need to be Einstein to determine that even if women out earned a majority of men, they would still employ the Apex fallacy and continue to look up, disregarding the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:40 PM
–

This is mostly a revenge fantasy. Believing this is why y'all struggle. You can't ignore all the different psychological studies and peer reviews on the topic that state the contrary... It's not a revenge fantasy, it's simply reality. The Chad hyperbole caricature that gets away with everything might not be real it is a real phenomenon that attractive people tend to get away with more bad behavior than unattractive do. Dating is not different. To deny it is to simply not live in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:33 PM
–

I'm personally not a very angry person, but lots of guys have anger issues. There's no mechanism by which I can "take responsibility" of the wider problem of male anger issues. The difference between the genders is that society look at those negative scenarios and places the responsibility on all the men. Society keeps men accountable, which is why "teach men not to rape" was so popular at one point. The point is that those negative conducts are used to then paint all men as that, insinuating th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:30 PM
–

Why are these lonely men incapable of doing what women did? This goes against the statement that the original comment made btw. If both genders feel JUST AS LONELY yet women TEND to have MORE FRIENDS, what makes you think the solution for the male loneliness epidemic is widening their social circle? The whole point is that the wider social circle that women generally have doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:25 PM
–

when study after study shows both sexes are equally lonely says otherwise Male loneliness epidemic entails more than studies that evaluate how disconnected people feel. It entails things like mental health, suicide, violent outbursts, hate rhetoric etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:22 PM
2

Railroading the topic again. Can't say I didn't see it coming. Never did I argue the CAUSE of why men don't have many social safety nets. I simply STATED that your assessment that men are allowed to succeed more in life is directly contradicted by the LACK of safety nets for them when a person is theoritically in the worst place to be at, and would need the help to succeed. So guys are capable of voting for Trump to piss off feminists but you’ll get squeamish because some man haters yell at you?…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:20 PM
–

Matches on Tinder doesn’t mean options. Options doesn’t mean good options. It is fairly logical to understand that the more options you have for something, the easier it is to segregate or discard those that you do not like. If women are faced with a "lack" of good options (which imo its bs) despite the numerous options available to them, what makes you think it's any easier for the men that struggle to get any options at all? The men still have to apply the same standards to evaluate their opti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:13 PM
–

True forgot about that word.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:57 AM
–

The post: Help me understand the "not girlfriend material" phenomenon You: She isn’t ignored in general like unwanted males. Your comparison is incorrect Most men that use the "not girlfriend material" to refer to a woman that has been with a lot of guys, would ignore such a woman for a committed relationship... how illogical do you have to be to not understand the context of the entire post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:09 PM
–

In this hypothethical scenario of a man curving a woman because of the high amount of sexual partners, then yes, that woman is ignored. That's kind of the whole point of the example.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 09:23 PM
4

The same reason men don't file for divorce; they're averse to detailing failures, challenges Which is indicative of... a societal structure that tells men that they cannot fail, and if they do, they are done and nobody will help them otherwise they are not real men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 09:22 PM
3

That's....my point. Why are you repeating me so much. They're less likely to take chances that negatively affect them. Which is why they fail less What are you actually refuting about my initial statement? Because I argued that the problem, is that men DO fail more, because they take more risks, YET societal safety nets help women more than men proportionality speaking. Therefore, no, men are not given more chances to succeed but rather the opposite, women do. Partly because they are less risk a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 07:01 PM
–

Which is funny because that's often the same reason BP argue about men that are dateless. Something MUST be wrong with them. Otherwise they would get somebody. But if a woman is ignored because of the amount of sexual partners she had, that's the fault of the men, not her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:56 PM
–

It would be the ultimate compliment if the effort her past partners gave to her was the same that you are giving to her now for the same treatment. But most of the times it isn't. The guy she settles with offends up doing more for less. Also it's a big IF. There is a difference between choosing out of necessity and out of want.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:53 PM
8

So why are you complaining about the lack of safety nets for guys? . First of all. I'm not complaining. I simply stated that your argument thar men are given more chances to succeed is directly contradicted by the amount of social safety nets awarded to them. If they were given more chances to succeed, they would partake more in societal nfatety nets because those directly give them more chances to succeed. Your group clearly don’t believe in safety nets Don't believe in PARTAKING in safety nets…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:37 PM
4

Uh? My point is that men get less aid exactly because they partake in it less. My point exactly is that the safety nets aren't skewed towards women because society gives men less chances but because men actively refuse to take chances. Ah yes. We all know that women take more financial chances that end them up in bankruptcy and homelessness than men do. Backward logic. Women are less prone to take chances that could affect them negatively. we have mountains of studies proving that the case, wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:31 PM
3

Depends on how you mean this. Women using more social safety nets is exactly that. Men tend not to pursue them just as much. That's not reflective of those safety nets refusing to include men or not give them chances. It does when objectively speaking, more men are failing or have failed, but receive half as many resources as women do by proportionality. Most homeless shelters are 50/50, for instance, despite more than 2/3rds of the homeless population being composed by men. So, by nature of mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:26 PM
6

Manosphere coupled up with conservatives, first of all. Wouldn't it be the opposite? Assuming most conservative men despise welfare, wouldn't that mean that since they don't partake in welfare, then they believe nobody else should either? That doesn't disprove anything that I said. If you’re all for safety, nets, why are you part of a group that despises the safety nets for children? See above. Nothing in your comment even remotely was related to what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:19 PM
10

As in? Like I said, it would be reflected in the lowest parts of society, but the inverse happens. Men are not given more chances women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:37 PM
3

Certain things are done in society to protect the most vulnerable. Shelters exist because it is extremely dangerous for a woman and child to be unhoused. 75% of homeless deaths every year are men. Welfare benefits are available to men. They just need to apply. That's not how it works. And you clearly speak from a privileged place. Welfare is selective in part because of the limited resources available. And like you previously said, women are given priority over men. Not only that but let's assum…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:36 PM
13

Dude, I wasn’t just talking about dating. If men truly were given way more chances overall in life to succeed and get help, it would be reflected in a society's safety nets. Things like homeless shelters, the amount of welfare benefits, things like affordable housing, shelters, or like schollarships that are only gender-based, affirmative action, etc. Yet by every metric, women use way more social safety nets than men do. If we specify only dating, that still doesn't work. Like women routinely c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:50 PM
4

Your only error is that you brought up math and hard verifiable data into the discussion. Women here won't engage In that and will just downvote quietly because it doesn't paint them as the gender that is struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 10:55 PM
–

Reminder, last time she dated was in 2008. Same year Facebook became popular. Also she is married to a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:24 PM
–

... you're either twelve or never interacted with women before Can't say much cuz it could be perceived as a witch hunt, but that account is most likely a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:22 PM
–

We can change and adapt with the times. Which starts with acknowledging things like that the safety equipment doesn't work as well for women and that that is part of why they don't want to do the job. The problem that you have is that you erroneously believe that almost every "hard" job that is primarily composed of male workers, are so because of their equipment. As if the equipment themselves are made with the intention to exclude women. As a basic example, women in the military train with far…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 10:07 PM
–

As someone who has known unhinged women all her life, their man hating and wokeness comes from serious trauma. With the unhinged guys, mainly LGBT ones who deal with crazy family. With unhinged straight men, however, I noticed it’s mainly been mundane stuff driving them to the arms of anti-feminists. Had to laugh at the obvious bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:51 PM
9

The biggest difference between the two, is that current discourse promotes women to do whatever they want because each of them is perfect in their own way, so even if they seem to be failing, they are generally coddled by society at large. Men don't have that resource.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:28 PM
11

Getting married is my only goal in life but I’ve never learned how to be wife material, due to my mum being a feminist who taught me that my value isn’t in being someone’s wife. I worry that if I don’t learn how to be or not be wife material by 30 (8 years away), no one else will want me except my boyfriend but even then, we might not get married. She's right btw. Your value shouldn't be tied to another. You should put value in yourself, before seeking a relationship, let alone marry a partner f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:14 PM
–

The claim was that bullying keeps you from learning social skills. And it became a competition when you decided to use your life exp. Because the validity of your life exp is just as valid as the other person's life exp that disagrees with your opinion. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:04 PM
–

I have seen one shorter and fat guy in a relationship with a taller woman. Most of the fat guys in relationships tend to be far far taller than the woman they are dating or married to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:02 PM
–

Oh so you want it to be a competition? lol Girl... you made it a competition when you decided to use your very specific life experience in order to erroneously state a generalization...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 09:01 PM
–

but doesn't mean low self esteem doesn't correlate with attractiveness. Low self-esteem does not NECESSARILY correlate with attractiveness, otherwise the majority of attractive people would have mental health problems and would constitute a larger portion of things like suicide etc. Stating that a single mental disorder is typically shown in attractive people, does not mean that the majority of attractive people suffer from such disorder. I think the difference between me and you is you might be…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:56 PM
–

thinking about it I think you're wrong, the hottest people I know have the lowest self esteem, this is why they're hot, their low self esteem compels them to become as hot as possible You are wrong then, because it is the opposite. Attractive people tend to be more outgoing, confident, have a more positive outlook on life, tend to get hired and promoted easier and faster, and tend to have a wider social net. As far as studies go, narcissism (a mental disorder due to very low self esteem) actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:50 PM
–

Mothers are increasingly becoming primary earners, with data showing significant increases in this role Uh, no. Women, not mothers, btw, are still a huge minority, when it comes to PRIMARY earnings in a household. The egalitarian household is shortening the gap, meaning there is a increase of households where both genders contribute roughly the same, but women being PRIMARY caregivers has largely remained the same: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:34 PM
–

Those dangerous jobs are also designed for men, the equipment, the safety gear, all of it is still designed to work with a male body They are "desgined" for men, because men do those jobs... you got the cause and effect backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 08:28 PM
1

You are lying like straight up, the concensus online and in here at the time was that he was a piece of shit and deserved way more jail time than he got. Lying about stuff so easily verifiable is asinine.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:27 AM
0

Fuck off. Like no he wasn't. Reddit was behemetdly against him since the start. Nobody was defending him, even here. What are you smoking? I just searched PPD for his name and a single post came up, and it was heavily downvoted and clowned for. In fact, how the f would you know what was said on PPD when your account was created in 2022?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:15 AM
2

Ah yes. Brock Turner, the man that was caught raping an unconscious woman, got beat up, then got his name dragged through the mud rightfully so that he tried to go either his middle name after his daddy bailed him out? That Brock Turner? Infamously hated online and IRL? You have to be mental if you believe that men were defending him en masse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:11 AM
1

The education system was designed by men for boys. Because in the beginning girls were not always allowed to attend school, or attended only until about 6th grade. The education system was wildly different in the 1900s and even before that compared to the rigid and extremely passive learning system we have today. Part of that was because of girl's inclusions in the classroom. The major outlet that boys have to manifest their emotions and what they feel is through active play, yet those kinds of …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 06:21 AM
6

So gay men being thrown off rooftops for loving another man by other men isnt a male issue? A gay man being thrown off of a rooftop for loving another gay man isn't a male issue, it's a gay issue. Do you think that women don't experience homophobia and don't get treated equally or worse in certain countries? Wow. How insensitive you must be. tHERe’s noThInG MorE i can ReAllY SAY I’m JusT sHOcKED. There’s nothing more I can really say I’m just shocked. No, you aren't. You are just a troll that po…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:23 AM
7

Putting your life on the line for somebody else is not being a decent human being. The reason why those kinds of situations are seen as brave is because that is going far beyond what a normal person would. Men always want rewards and pats on the head for being a basically decent human being The empathetic gender in full display here btw
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:13 AM
5

Homophobia is an issue for people of the LGBTQ+ community, which men can belong to so. But it's not a male specific issue. How ignorant do you have to be to not understand what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:38 PM
1

So not caring who the main victims of those typesnof hate crimes are? This is the fucking problem. That male specific problems cannot be discussed at all. It HAS to be related to a more "oppressed" community in order to be allowed to be discussed. Thank you, you literally proved the point. Pointing how Homophobia is not a male-specific issue is not me neither not caring about it, or men not thinking it's a problem. It's simply, not a male specific issue. Women keep advising man that there is a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:33 PM
5

The issue is with men who dont know how to behave and demanding empathy while he has none for others. if you think men can’t express their sexuality without being pieces of shit, that says a lot about how you view men. I'm gonna be honest. The kind of men that behave that way, tend to be either burned out incels online, or sociopaths/abusive men that always seem to have a partner justifying and excusing their behavior. Crying “Men arent allowed to have preferences, but women are!” but then this …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:06 PM
4

My girl. WE DO! What do you think happens to a man that gets caught by other men raping another woman out in public? If they don't immediately flatline him on the spot it would be a miracle. The actuality is that men do call out bad behavior. We do point it out. But usually the kind of men that do this shit out in public, tend to either have status or are attractive, so they get a lot of defenders, mostly women. The amount of times that I have personally seen a woman being interested in a guy, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:50 PM
7

Because they dont know how to genuinely be good people. They pretended to be nice for pussy and got mad that their fakeness didn't yield results. I disagree. As in, yeah maybe some men and boy teens, fake being nice when they are actually assholes in the hopes of getting pussy, but I think that the majority of times this is not the case. I do think that generally speaking both men and women tend to be nice and cordial with one another. The thing is, that when teen and young adult men have a crus…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:42 PM
7

That's fine, I just think that you don't come here to truly lay an insight into the problems in the dating market, you just come here to insult the people that in your eyes, dare criticize the current problems of it or "whine" about it. After all you got yours. You don't care about those that haven't gotten theirs, even if it's harder now. What you are currently doing is the equivalent of kicking the ladder down, after climbing it rather easily, and then mocking the people that have to climb the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:23 PM
10

CURRENT VIRGIN MEN POST HERE because they ARE STILL PRESENTLY trying to engage in the CURRENT DATING MARKET, EVEN IF THEY CONTINUE TO REPEATEDLY FAIL. So yes, the current virgin man that keeps continuously failing in the current age, has more merits when it comes to the discussion of the current dating market, than somebody that the last time they had engaged in any sort of tangible way in the dating market, was almost 20 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:05 PM
8

The point that I tried to make, is that you lay judgement and comment here on the current dating dynamics, when the last time you ever actually dated was before the social media age began. Like, the fundamental statement regarding the dating dynamics in this sub, is that it is almost completely agreed that the dating problems of the 2000s has been exacerbated by the Social Media age. Yet you come here and type as if you have any sort of exp with it. If I saw a discussion about the current phones…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:00 PM
4

Yet, many women can no longer have abortions in the many states in the USA even when their life is at risk. The concept of abortions, at least in the legal sense in the U.S. is not that women shouldn't have abortions. What the U.S. Supreme court determined, is that the concept of the legality of abortions should be handled in a State by State basis, and not be forced by the Federal Supreme Court. Many universities continue to favor male applicants in 2025 in the USA. We are actualky still arguin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:54 PM
8

You do know that when most people talk about Feminism, they do mean the West right? Nobody is arguing that women that primarily are born in the middle east have feminism. Lmao. But it would be incredibly stupid to justify male privilege in the west, by pointing out that feminism doesn't exist in the east. If anything it would be the opposite. The morals of the western world gives the privilege to those that are perceived to be weaker or less fortunate, to have a voice and be heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:52 PM
0

Isn't that the point of TRP. To teach men that don't know how the rules or how to win the game to go on to win it eventually? You are just reiterating that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:44 PM
9

Everybody knows that having friends is an equal substitute to having a romantic partner, right? I mean, why do the majority of people want to have a romantic/sexual partner, when they can simply have friends. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:41 PM
5

She’s not “incapable of entertaining herself”, so much as if you are on a date with her, she’s SUPPOSED to be paying attention to YOU. You completely miss the point. The point men make when it comes to the idea that it's the man's job to keep their new date entertained and stimulated is not that the woman aren't paying attention to the men, but rather that when it comes to dating, women are entirely passive EVEN WHEN they go on a date with a guy. Most people even men understand how awkward it mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:31 PM
10

So you were single up until the same year Facebook overtook Myspace for the largest social media platform and practically started the social media age. No wonder you have your beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:24 PM
–

I have always stated that the reason why RP is so hated by BPers, is three-fold. Because it goes against the narrative of the Just World/Karmic fallacy. AKA If you are a good person, good things will happen to you. If you are bad person, bad things happen. Ugly men are Ugly because they are bad people. Because it gives the necessary perspective and tools to low-valued men to either ascend, or "disguise" themselves as high-value. Most BPers and women specifically, have an inherent "Pull yourself …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:09 PM
11

Did I claim different?.Why the aggresion?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 05:58 PM
13

Stats say that women tend to be in relationships far more than men do in the same age range tho. So I'm not sure what you mean by this. Unless women are dating much older men, which I doubt, The logical other option is that women classify FWBs and Situationships as relationships and men don't. Hence why this guy classified his friends that are women as single, because to him, they aren't in a comitted relationship, but if you were to ask them, they would mention thar they have a FWB.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:13 PM
23

The issue is not that women have voluntary celibacy but why. Having voluntary celibacy until the point they want to just have sex at a moments notice (more or less) is completely different from putting on a clown face in the hopes one woman finds you worthwhile for it. Like people above have said. Women never stress about sex because the moment they want it, they will have it. Men don't have that option unless they are Greek Adonis to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:10 PM
7

What makes someone sexually compatible or not with you? Does it rely on physical characteristics or simply a willingness to do? I'd assume she's referring to the detail you left out when quoting her. She says she's kinky, so he should be into that stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:32 PM
7

It's not, that was pretty much agreed back when RP sub wasn't banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:39 PM
41

Yeah, the average age gap between couples is around ~3 years, meaning women tend to pick men that are slightly older (established) than them, but not living in a completely different world as them. Think, freshman to senior, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:28 PM
–

I find it interesting that on any given celebrity thread there's always some Redditor in the comments who grew up with them or something. You should read up on the term "6 Degrees of Separation." Basically, to connect two people who are seemingly unrelated to each other in the entire globe, it only takes 6 steps. This means that mathematically speaking, you and I could be connected right now, and it would only take us 6 or fewer people between us to connect. Maybe my mother knows your best frien…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:58 AM
15

Ngl, this is hilarious. "Just approach women if you want a girlfriend." "Hmmm, this guy looks like he is extroverted and more likely to cheat because he had the audacity to approach me without knowing me beforehand." The game is rigged. Men cannot win.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:51 AM
7

Usually, Hallmark movies have the woman quit her high stress job and take a different, less stressful job, or even become a housewife to the new guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 07:29 PM
25

Hallmark channel movies are usually about a tired single or divorced woman, who moves back to her home town or somewhere in the Midwest, meets a tall strong man with a flannel shirt that seems nice, does a physical labor job, and handles every repair in her home and then has to contend with him or a rich handsome guy she stumbled into before meeting the flannel guy. They still employ patriarchal tones lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 04:05 PM
7

But young women of late are the most vocal about any kinds of justice/morality topics, or all about inclusion of diverse preferences, appearances and behaviors. They are much more educated and intelligent compared to former generations. That has nothing to do with them as a collective not being shallow. You can easily fight against racism and still have an inherent bias to favor attractive people of color over ugly people of color. There's a reason why Lookism or Pretty Privilege is not rooted i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:08 PM
59

One thing I appreciate about the younger generation of women is that they are indeed less shallow attraction-wise. I have no doubt about it. Huh? Younger people are more RUTHLESS when it comes to physical attraction. Therefore they are EVEN MORE SHALLOW than older generations. There's a reason why young Gen-Zers are now a significant portion of the gym memberships. Because they all care about being hot and attractive. Because they are more shallower than the older generations, even the older Gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:47 PM
1

Two days. She said that it took 2 days from report to action which got her fired. So realistically maybe a day after it went viral. Again, obviously a company will take a particular case OUT OF ALL THE OTHERS with the same possible merits a priority if it goes viral, but the problem still remains that she never let DoorDash handle it internally. She made it incredibly public from the start. Which means that yeah, DoorDash should have fired her as well. You don't want an employee disparaging your…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:01 PM
7

You need to learn how to read better. He clearly said that discouraging men from approaching, would only stop the men that are empathethic enough to treat women well. The men that are scumbags, will still keep approaching women and harassing them. So now, you effectively only made the problem worse, because only horrible men harass women when they approach, the men that treat women with respect have already agreed with you and decided to not bother women in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:17 PM
11

The equivalent would be that a woman pays a guy to fix her porch, and once he gets to her place, the door is "open", and she's seemingly sleeping on a couch, naked, not moving. Would that man then could claim that he was SA'd? Nope. Sexual Harassment? Maybe. But if he were to post that video on a social media, he would be called 100% a misogynist sex-obsessed pig that violated a woman's consent to her privacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:07 PM
7

Sexual Assault Including but not limited to rape, is defined as having committed any of the following acts: Any physical sexual contact that involves the use or threat of force or violence or any other form of coercion or intimidation. Any physical sexual contact with a person who is unable to consent due to incapacity or mental or physical impairment. “Incapacity” or “impairment” include but are not limited to being under the influence of alcohol or drugs orbeing too young to consent. Sexual Ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:00 PM
3

Uh, no. Like I said in another comment, he could get charged with indecent exposure, if the police deem it so and I wouldn't care, but the girl is clearly also in the wrong for not waiting for Doordash to make a response to her own report. She instead wanted to get clout on tiktok, and got herself fired.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:47 PM
7

https://x.com/FearedBuck/status/1980308730551165372 She had time to take the angle, open her camera, record him, and walk away without him moving or getting hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:40 PM
4

DoorDash's response likely was accelerated due to the spread of the video on social media. However, the problem still lies that she posed the naked man on tiktok for views. All she needed to do was wait until DoorDash did their job. If they didn't, then she could post it. But she literally took less than a single day to report to them and then post the video on Tiktok. Like I'm sorry, but name any large global company with millions of users and employees that makes a response to a particular rep…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:39 PM
4

https://manowarsecurity.com/doordash-girl-sa-original-video-tiktok-debate-controversy/ You can see that the guy is not moving, his dick isn't even hard and she's staring at him for a long time, enough to pull her phone and record it. Like you cannot think that this guy was conscious during the event. If he was conscious and had planned all of this, he has legit a Zen-like meditative state, because any guy who was perverted enough to try this would INSTANTLY be getting hard as she looks and feels…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:34 PM
6

She reported it first to DoorDash, then posted it to Tiktok to get views. Doordash first banned the customer, then when they saw that she posted the video on Tiktok, they banned her too. Just like Tiktok took down her videos for posting porn online. https://x.com/captainatomIDC/status/1980328944906956907/photo/1
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:27 PM
3

She even mentioned that he was passed out tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:25 PM
8

It was. Lmao. Here's some of the proof: https://np.reddit.com/r/doordash/comments/1oavooh/original_video_from_tiktok_doordash_sa_allegation/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:20 PM
4

She opened the door. She said so in the original video which she immediately deleted after getting called out, and then posted the SA one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:18 PM
10

It's unclear. Because in the original video, which she deleted, she had said that she OPENED the door and saw the man naked. At best, the man could be charged with indecent exposure, but thats a big iff, because he was sleeping in his own home.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:17 PM
2

General trends create themselves. If general trends did not exist you would see a lot more variances in terms of attractiveness between lovers, but they usually tend to stick with their equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:36 PM
4

Depends. If we both work, then we both put the same effort into contributing to the expenses. Sure, this is relative to the amount of expenses and the wage disparity between us. If she's a housewife/not working, then keeping the living space clean, and maybe one hot meal a day. If she's working, we can alternate chores. I don't mind. She pays attention to me and truly asks how I'm doing. I don't express myself at all, so just talking about it is a huge relief sometimes. She isn't afraid of calli…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:31 PM
1

Let me guess, you've watched a few whatever podcast episodes where the women (largely onlyfans creators or sex workers) state they will only date men over 6ft or millionaires and now you've based your entire worldview around this? First of all, you are being way too aggressive for a simple debate. Secondly, no, I don't watch RP content, no content at all. I was one of the few RPers that just did what the original sidebar said to do: Read the essential list, which were around 5 books, lift and fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:08 PM
0

Nope, it's definitely what I said. This is just manosphere horseshit. Agree to disagree. Yes, that's the problem. Your interpretation of something that I never actually said. Because most people tend to say that when they refer to their closest people around them. Not strangers on the internet... The first boyfriend I ever had abused me, I posted online asking if anyone had been in a similar situation and a 'mgtow' subreddit picked it up and called me a 'relentless whore' and said I deserved it …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:00 PM
4

I'm not saying you, especifically, just that most people are downvoting it but not replying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:51 PM
-1

If anything, women largely deciding to abstain from dating and marriage is largely due to this. Or it could be because women's egos have increased, which lead to them rather being single than not being a man they "perceive" to be in their league... It's multifaceted, but both can be true. I never said anything about friends putting me down, try again. I interpreted this: Funny because I've been told that I must've been 'aiming too high' As your friends or families telling you that... Who else wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:50 PM
3

I'm eating downvotes but nobody is replying to it lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:48 PM
3

Exceptions don't make the rule: a rare or unusual instance does not change or invalidate a general principle or rule. The existence of an exception is simply a rare occurrence that does not disprove the general rule. If what you said is true. I'm sorry you went through that, especially about your friends putting you down by devaluing your self-worth. But your personal exp doesn't disprove the general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:45 PM
5

I get the sense from red pill that no woman is deserving of anything, especially of the coveted princess treatment, until certain criteria are met or their worth is proven. The problem is that most modern young women come with inflated ego and self-worth that they deserve everything just because of their existence. If a woman who is insanely attractive, intelligent, and successfully wants her partner to be that as well, most men or even red pillers wouldn't have a problem with that The problem i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:15 PM
4

Tbf, that goes with every branch of psychology. It's not as rigorous as everybody would like to believe. Including it's falsifyability. It's just easier to point the faults of evo-psych because It's more blatant in its justification: "We do this thing because in ancient times, this was advantageous." Etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:14 PM
0

TBF, you can be an average guy and still struggle because women in your area look or hope to find a much better person than you. Doesn't mean they can't be average.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 09:42 PM
–

Do they? I'd genuinely like to read them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:26 PM
–

They have more options which by numbers, would lead to them finding a better match... So it is easier to choose between 100 different matches, than to have no choices at all tho, if the purpose of the exercise is to find a match.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:22 PM
–

It means there are some aspects of RP they disagree with. For somebody that declares herself as no pill, you sure have a very black and white worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:15 PM
2

Life doesn’t give you positive reinforcement all the time When systematically you are raised to believe that you are on average worse than how you really are, you will develop that mental handicap, regardless. Elephants are one if nature's smartest and empathetic creatures, yet place a baby elephant inside a coral with a rope on a pole attached to it's leg, and it will grow up thinking that they will never be able to crush or walk over their corral, no matter how strong or tall they really are. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 03:48 PM
4

You do understand that the guy was tall, AKA over 6 feet, handsome, and had a high status among his community? Him being over 6 feet meant he was part of only 14% of the male population that had that genetic feature. That plus him being above average in looks compared to the rest of the men + having a well respected position among the alumni meant he was flying far above average men. Like you can not be serious. He was, by all accounts, part of the Apex of men because of all his advantages, both…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:54 PM
8

You mean me... I described him as decently attractive. Men don't call men hot. He was handsome, just not model tier, just like the women were attractive but not models.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:39 AM
8

RP tells you that attractiveness and status supersedes all else including major character flaws a man has to women. He literally was proving RP right. Because these women were sleeping with a slob of a man, because he was attractive and had a prestigious position in the university.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 02:24 AM
4

They had range, mostly between average and above average. They weren't models, but they certainly were mostly above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:39 AM
1

Okay, you really lack reading comprehension. The ORIGINAL PERSON that brought up SPECIFICALLY BOTH CHINA AND INDIA, was the WOMAN, NOT THE GUY YOU HAD ORIGINALLY responded to. Capeesh? Therefore, you responded to the WRONG person ABOUT USING those specific examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:38 AM
2

So go complain to the woman that mentioned those two countries as a rebuttal, not the person that mentioned how in those two countries, women get to still have their pick of the litter as a response to said comment made by the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:35 AM
2

In china there is disproportionately more men because of misogyny, what a dumb example. It would have been a dumb example... If it wasn't for the fact that the other woman mentioned both China and India... Two countries where arranged marriages are still commonly used... You need to learn to read. You insulted the wrong person because of that. lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:32 AM
6

From what I've seen, women can tolerate anything and everything as long as the guy has decent status and is attractive. I was roommates with a guy that showered once every 3-4 days, smelled like sweat, his room was a pigsty, you literally could feel when your shoes or feet stuck to the floor in his part of the house, did not do his share of chores, did not clean bathrooms, left the kitchen a mess, sometimes his entire being smelled so bad that we had to open windows, but he had a regular amount …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:25 AM
5

she just wants to come over to my house for the first date, we're absolutely NOT going to have sex at all because she isn't like that. She's just gonna get a cup of the most cheap ass coffee around at 12am bro. Duh
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:18 PM
5

I'm not sure either. I'm guessing it's the unicorn version of the perfect man? So a man that is attractive and confident as an "alpha" or "chad" but willing to settle down with the woman, and providing her with stability. Basically the 6/6/6 unicorn: 6 abs, 6 feet tall, 6 figure income, but willing to settle down with the average woman. That's my best guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:14 PM
12

Exactly. I remember how I used to carry out so many duties for female friends and get nothing in return. I basically just told myself that if they don't reach out on their own for something other than me helping them or me being their emotional tampon and geniunely were interested in talking in anything but their love life, or godforbid, were interested in my life, then they weren't really friends. Only one of them out of 8 or so female friends reached out just to talk about stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:29 PM
1

True... good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:06 AM
1

At 1 am? In this economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:03 AM
1

Today was core and leg day. I'm sore. No partying for me tonight.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:47 AM
2

Because these men weren't dating them or spending time together outside of sex. They were FWBs in all but name. The women called it a situationship because they believed wrongly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:53 AM
3

I'm saying that these women were CALLING IT a situationship when it clearly wasn't. That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:45 AM
3

Because the guys in question were not really interested in a relationship with the women in hand... They actively were curving these women...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:01 AM
3

Considering that if I brought up the possibility of the relationship being a FWB instead of a situationship and they'd scoff at the idea, then I would assume yeah. They seemed open to the idea of actually dating the men, the men just had no interest in taking that step further.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:09 AM
9

Most of the times I've heard people say situationship Almost all of the times I heard the term, it has been said by women to describe a FWB, ex or co-worker that they hope the men ask them fully out, while in actuality the men continue to string them along. Often times because the men are non-committal in everything but name. I think I have only heard one or two guys mention the term, but it was the inverse, the girl was curving them in all but sex, but they were already pinning for her. I'm 27,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 11:03 PM
–

Because the main message behind Mulan's cartoon movie, is not that Mulan had special powers that only men had... it's that Mulan and all the other women were as capable as the men, they just need to think outside the box instead of trying to fight men head-on. Constantly throughout the movie, Mulan sees how men do certain things, and tries to replicate them, when they inevitably fail, due to her lack of physical prowess, she resorts to ingenuity, which culminates with her taking the final cannon…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:42 PM
–

Just like baby Anakin spinning cause that’s a neat trick destroying a ship. Which was heavily criticized and is still is... the only diff is that he was already poised to be the "chosen one", so literally he is on his own separate level in terms of powers. Luke using the force to destroy the Death Star after one inspirational talk from Obi Wan and not much else. You forget that they constantly mentioned how Luke was already training to be a pilot, and the classic throwaway line that hinted that …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:27 PM
3

Yeah, even when you have the stereotypical male protagonist that is stoic and is macho, they still struggle due to their circumstances that are mostly out of their control. You don't even really see that with girl bosses. If anything, most of the time, girl bosses just latch on to something that is external or somewhat disconnected from their own lives and that becomes their main motive throughout the time they appear on screen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:23 PM
11

Which again, sometimes that is not ACCOUNTED FOR in the WRITING of these ANTIQUATED laws. Which is WHY they should be REWORKED.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:03 PM
9

Your comment is just a lot of twisted verbiage to say “it’s my money”. No, what I'm saying is that current laws were not made in a time where women were commonly working alongside their husbands. So a lot of the wording was specifically designed to make it so that men gave more than what they right now should, because women back THEN did not work as they do NOW. Obviously things are different now, and the laws should be reworked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:40 PM
9

And men HATE those laws and actively want to overturn them I think it's less about actively overturning them and more like correcting them. Most divorce laws right now, like domestic violence laws/procedures, have it in wording that women should be protected because of their identity, and not because of the merits of a case by case basis. So ultimately, those laws and procedures ultimately overwhelmingly favor women, even if they realistically shouldn't. If the purpose or intent of those laws is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:33 PM
14

It's a bad thing that we don't have laws that are specifically designed to deal with situations where a divorce would lead one party stranded with no money, specially if that person just so happens to be the main caretaker of children of the recently failed marriage... right? Oh wait. We do!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:55 PM
–

What does this have to do with what I said or who I was responding to?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 07:15 PM
–

Probably because men DON'T deny that big boobs are more attractive to the majority of the male population... The process in which you (often BPs or women) selectively ignore things when trying to make gotcha comments like yours should be scientifically studied. If you posted, "Men say that the size of boobs doesn't matter but look at how many men lust after Sydney Sweeney." Everybody would laugh at you because men never as a reasonable collective have stated that small boobs are better than big …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 06:03 PM
5

Most men just don't want to admit that they're not attractive enough for most women who they don't know to want to date them at first sight - even though this isn't even a new phenomenon. Isn't that what RP literally states, tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:43 PM
–

No, like I said, I saw you in the comment chain here acting all smug, and the name sounded familiar turns out it's the guy that lies and requotes himself. You sir are the peak, the apex of the redditors, and every discord mod wishes they could be on your level. Anyways I just wanted to say hi and to check if you still were going around lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:36 AM
1

No, no, I was asking you if you are still requoting yourself and passing it off as something somebody else had said before I called you out. Which was the last time I saw you in the comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:29 AM
1

Are you still going around re-quoting yourself, my guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:17 AM
1

Might make a post on this but I think I found out why I dislike most of the men on here. Okay. I was talking to an acquaintance of mine at the gym at we got to the topic of his dating life as he had a long term girlfriend Okay... And this got me thinking pretty much every man I’ve met in my life bar maybe 2 would hook up with plenty of women if they had the opportunity so Okay and? Again of at least a couple hundred guys I’ve known over the years every guy who is able to be a player has done so …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:14 AM
1

This sub doesn't have many controversial fallouts nor extremist users relative to the baseline members that make a post that is extremely unhinged that everybody clowns on them. The people that often post like that are trolls and the mods usually ban them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 10:51 PM
1

Straight up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 10:45 PM
8

I don't date women who shame fat people. Why? Because I was fat once. I know the struggle. So I already support fat men by treating them with respect and dignity, just like I do with fat women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 10:19 PM
1

Right. I don't disagree. But again, the male equivalent have worse experiences and negative connotations. So even these shamed women are still fairly ahead of their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:41 PM
0

Because the outspoken positive support is bigger than the negative support they receive... Getting 1 hate comment vs 10 other women showing their support quickly grows your ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:37 PM
5

Single mothers Single fathers are shamed, just differently. Single fathers often get treated as pedos by the other parents in schools. crazy cat ladies Ah yes, because the guy that has 1 roided up pitbull, wears reflective sunglasses, and either owns a big ass f-150 or a hummer is certainly not shamed or is the equivalent The "compensating for something" or "mid-life crisis men." Or you know... every weird uncle that is always single at family gatherings.... sluts and land whales Sluts are shame…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:29 PM
9

They also neglect that a big portion of those men simply end their lives... So their numbers are always balanced by their own self-destructige culling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:21 PM
10

You are thinking way too small. A big portion of men's drive to further succeed professionally is to one day marry, buy a large house, and "settle down" with a wife, maybe have kids and whatnot. The "white picket fence" guys, if those guys were to all unitarily drop that hope/fantasy/motivation, the economy would tank. We would be talking about millions of men getting a small cozy apartment, with a gaming setup/hobby set up with the bare minimum necessities and just working as much as that lifes…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:55 PM
8

Slow eventual decline like Japan has, and just like Japan is doing, it would further push more movements/legislation towards globalization and mass emigration into the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:41 AM
4

No, women are repulsed by promiscuous men They are repulsed with *outwardly promiscuous men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:36 AM
5

There's also a redpillbook sub that is not quarantined (I believe) so if somebody needs the original lore, they can ask there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:32 AM
27

takeaway is that men need to find purpose in their lives and decenter women. If a majority of men did that overnight, a large majority of markets would collapse. Fingers crossed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:30 AM
–

There are no signs, or they're hard to find. Everything might be going seemingly well but then the instant you get married and she can withdraw the pussy then BOOM, dead bedroom. No way to predict this could happen. I can't really disagree with your take, but in OP's own words, she already was voicing and indicating how hard she is to please before they married: Sex has never been great. I don’t view it as something that has ever brought us closer together, trying to make it pleasurable for me h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:22 PM
–

In it a woman marries the man she lost her virginity to, with both of them knowing full well the sex situation is far from ideal Well, in this case: Together 20+ years. Been together since teenagers, we’re our first everything. For years we had a dynamic where he was clueless since he had no experience, I wanted him to be assertive and know how to make sex pleasurable, and he wanted me to just know what would work for me, but of course with no experience I didn’t know. My sensitive brakes meant …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:58 PM
3

And what the post is stipulating is that women generally do look for the same physical standards in men, which results in society's standards of male beauty. Trends can and do change, only loosely, but to bluntly say that women don't follow or impose those standards is just nonsense. Again, if we also apply the "standard" thought that women generally have more dating prospects that then equal male counterparts, except at the Apex of beauty, then it is also more likely that as you go further and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:34 PM
4

The dorky kid from class can grow up to be a handsome dude, the start quarterback can let himself go and end up without any matches after peaking in high school. That is still playing into the same male beauty standards of society tho. A dorky kid grew up and became attractive, is not suddenly having an mass appeal because of his "negative" qualities, in this case, it would be: Being a dorky kid, he would have a mass appeal because he has the physical features of that coincides closer to the mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:16 PM
10

It's like somebody mentioning that they like all kinds of ice-cream but when you inquire deeper into their likes, it's just all super expensive brands of ice-cream. Like sure, they like all kinds of flavors of ice-cream, but they only attempt to select from the most expensive and premium brands they can find.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:10 PM
3

Game means able to adapt to the woman you are trying to woo. I know guys that play the stumbling fuckboi, the emotional fuckboi, the normal fuckboi etc. The point is that guys with good game know how to adapt to women and lean to their strengths.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:52 AM
9

Shrek 1 would probably be a better movie, than Beauty and the Beast in that regard. Beast was still ultimately a handsome guy, just cursed, when it was undone, he was still handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 11:49 PM
8

But women asking your job isn’t of being gold digger. She just wants to measure the future and your ambition. Thats it It's rather the tone of it. Some women do aggressively ask, and it's somewhat clear what their intentions are. She's evaluating a man for their money first, in many cases. It’s the same way man asking if women is good with kid or cooking. That means the guy is measuring the future with you. What matters is if the guy is helping you when you are overwhelmed with the kid or cookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:40 PM
21

I think it's rather less that they don't know the difference, but that they don't care as long as it doesn't personally affect them. I know a shit ton of succesful guys that treat service workers worse than slaves, and are generally aggressive to anybody that gives them the slightest bit of push-back, even just verbal but their respective wives and girlfriends happily strut along. It's not a problem for them, until that aggression becomes a fist onto their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 10:38 PM
0

In 2014, around 40+ states had banned late-term abortions... obviously, when a large majority of the states inside the U.S. put something into law, most people and most neighboring states also generally follow the same thought process even if it's legal. Most people thought that before the overturn of Roe V Wade, all states where abortion was legal did not allow third trimester abortions except in case of medial emergencies. Your stat is literally a confirmation bias. Just because third trimeste…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 05:50 PM
1

Typically people find the first and second trimester more palatable without connecting the dots that a third trimester abortion overwhelmingly occurs because something is wrong with the fetus or the birth will very adversely impact the mother. Because of the phrasing of it. Most people find the first and second palatable WHEN IT COMES TO JUST CHOOSING to terminate the pregnancy. This means that if a woman is pregnant and in those stages and she chooses to abort, most people are fine with that. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 05:26 PM
1

Isn't that the crux of the issue? The phrasing of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 04:17 PM
–

username:IBribeMyBF makes post encouraging men to just buy submission from their women. has an earlier post detailing how she charged her bf for sex, and then cheated on him hmmmmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:07 AM
2

You know what's the worse thing? If I had been on the guy's side. I wouldn't have spoken up either. Why?. Because she wants a partner that is extroverted, likes to go explore different things, and see the world. She seems like an incredibly sweet girl, but I would no doubt think that she won't like me if I were to speak up and set up a first date. I'd bet my left nut that a part of those men self-excluded themselves in the same exact way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:00 AM
5

So the guy feels entitled to a certain treatment even if he isnt the same person Not necessarily entitlement, just that clearly he does not have the physical qualities that she most desires and feels strung along. I think most women would feel the same way if they found out that the guy they are dating who tends to be aloof, barely doing grand romantic gestures to them, had been attentive and commonly did grand romantic gestures to a number of women he dated before them. They would not necessari…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:49 PM
2

Because from the guy's perspective, the girl was more enthusiastic, more attracted, and more honest to the guy she skipped the dinner with than to him, the guy that did the "appropriate" steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:37 PM
2

Usually, it's because of the double standards. You could be a guy going in a nice date with a girl, having a good time, doing all the "right" steps to get her to open up and feel comfortable with you, end the date with hopefully a kiss or maybe more not knowing that same woman had went out with a guy, skipped the dinner and went straight into no-strings attached sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:13 PM
3

If he's happy and you are happy, nothing else matters, and should be left at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:01 PM
–

by the idea that the woman who's "alpha widowed" or a single mom is settling for an involuntary celibate who's barely had any relationship experience? Settling in my eyes involves somebody ending up in a relationship with somebody for convenience. Your example is literally one of the multiple types of scenario where you would classify it as settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 07:14 PM
24

Have hooked up with plenty of shorties but I don’t want to dilute my tall genes. Based. There's nobody more entitled than a 4'11-5'0 midget woman thinking she's on the same height (Ha!) as 6ft or even average height guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:47 AM
1

Prude, in this case, means prude to the beta. And I would wager that single moms are more sex avoidant for men they really don't physically want in the off chance of her getting pregnant again. Being a single mother to 1 child of a parent is hard enough. Imagine being a single mother to 2 children of 2 different fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 04:25 AM
1

Same with me. Left to my own devices, 100% of the boyfriends I’ve had turned out to be “nice guys.” Even the people I just got close to without dating were all that type. So obviously, my preference is nice guys. Because you directly said that those kinds of men in your formative years, never did their best to get your attention even to the point of your detriment or making you uncomfortable, and therefore never truly existed in your world. You then extrapolated that since you experienced that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:02 PM
1

Why I don’t remember the “nice guys”: they never talked to me, never shared snacks, never made any connection, never did anything noticeable—so I literally had no reason to register their existence. Yet you supposedly liked them. That's the problem. How can you like something that in your world does not exist? It's not possible. You didn't like them, because they did not exist to you, therefore, since they did not exist to you, they also had no reason to approach you, you were focused on other t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 09:59 AM
2

I am the kind of woman who likes that type of guy, yet in my younger years those boys didn’t even register in my awareness—I didn’t know their names, their personalities, nothing. Meanwhile, the popular Chads would go out of their way to talk to me even though I was a nerd, Out of simple gratitude, I ended up remembering their names whether I wanted to or not Even later, as adults, those “nice guys” would cross paths with me in places like school or a shared kitchen, and still wouldn’t say hi un…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:39 AM
6

And you don't think that most men wouldn't outright kill a man if they saw him raping a woman? Hell, why do you think rapists and child molesters are sent away from the general prison population? Because they are killed. Like what's your logic there?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:32 AM
8

Well if I told you that roaches understand consent better then men do you would be enraged despite it being a fact. Not gonna lie, even if I tried my very best to sound unhinged, I would not be even close to your level. Jesus Christ. Also invading privacy isnt such a bad thing when you know there are pedophiles all around the world. A small trivial sacrifice for a better society, regardless though technology will take over so we have to adapt to these systems regardless. You right, Send me your …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:20 AM
8

Just about all other forms of those are a form of protection or a joking way of saying a wild animal is safer then a man. Yeah, you definitely are a gold pill. You do see the best in people. Tea app exsisted so women can safely navigate dating as much possible regardless if those claims are true or not Oh yeah and the USA Patriot Act exists so the U.S. can protect us regardless of the claims that they could be invading people's privacies/massive surveillance are true or not. Men had their own te…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 03:08 AM
11

Let's see: Kill all men, check. Teach men not to rape, check. Metoo, check. sprinkle sprinkle, check. Man or Bear? check Tea app, being used to both disparage and doxx men, with no restrictions or evidence provided needed to make claims against these men, check. Gee, I wonder why younger men are becoming more and more hateful of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 02:35 AM
3

The discussion is about how the term “bad boy” is often used as shorthand for “masculine, maybe rouge-ish man who gets the girl that I’ll use to prop up my moral standing to feel better about myself” My brother in christ, boys learn this back in high school. Like I said, you aren't bringing anything new or insightful to the topic. Hell, people make memes about Falling In Reverse's song about it since it released: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IMoSgaKivs0
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:33 AM
2

This goes for ugly and hot people as a whole - regardless of gender. Hot women get away with a lot more than ugly women. Yes, the halo effect. this isn’t what this discussion is about Your original disscusion literally ended with your second paragraph, there's nothing else to discuss about that: Now, with the obligatory ‘yes sometimes this does happens’ out of the way, we can get to the real meat of this topic: Like you didn't make or provide any extra info or anything meaningful right after. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:29 AM
4

But the entire problem is that the standards to apply the consequences are ENTIRELY different for both sets of men. Like I said before, an attractive man and the ugly man can both do the SAME amount of actions, whether or not they are morally reprehensible in reality, yet suffer different consequences, both good and bad. The majority of "nice guys" that are just starting to get into that mindset, hear that women want to be respected, treated with both kindness and fairness, and to not be bothere…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:20 AM
6

You are correct. That is exactly how I interpreted what OP said. The problem with what OP is trying to say it's that it is still rather subjective for both the man and the woman being approached. Specially if you take into account the attractiveness of the man approaching. A hot guy acting persistent on a woman is sign of commitment, dedication, and good nature, he only wants her after all, an ugly man acting persistent on a woman is a sign of social shamelessness, inconsideration, neediness, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:11 AM
6

The problem is that in the case of the WNBA, they do not want to go through the same hurdles that the original NBA did, like low wages at the start, lack of funding, etc. The players want the entire world to treat them and pay them as LeBron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 07:02 AM
–

Omg you are basing this off what kids and teens say? As if their understanding of the world is almost ever correct. What I'm saying is that what people learn and go through during their FORMATIVE YEARS impacts their adult life. We have tons of studies of how socio-economics can impact a person's academic and professional life or how a child that lives in an abusive environment is more likely to perpetuate it when they are adults, how is it any different when it comes to the ideas that are reinfo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 03:49 PM
–

I'd say both genders, since both tend to both watch and like romcoms but women tend to have a slightly bigger audience that engages in that genre: https://today.yougov.com/entertainment/articles/45146-americans-relationship-romantic-comedies-poll I did not blame men nor women for what these media portray. I simply said, that women being bluntly honest is a relatively recent thing and that the culture surrounding female sexuality was different barely 10-15 years ago, which was around the time tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:45 PM
–

Examples of the trope? The Girl Next Door (2004) Love at First Hiccup (2009) I Love You, Beth Cooper (2009) Chuck, Tv-show (2007-2012) She's Out of My League (2010) Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010) Those are the first few of the top of my head that generally sent that message.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:29 PM
–

If it was so obvious, then how do you explain the rise of red pill content in the 2020s? if it was so obvious, then why did men, specially young men start consuming so much of that content, or how do you explain the sudden increase of people going to gyms, specially among Gen Z? It wasn't as obvious as you argue it was. Women nowadays are more honest than they did when we were teens and kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:21 PM
–

It's not blaming Disney movies, it's the entire culture SURROUNDING female sexuality in media and the culture in general. I mentioned disney, because it's the most obvious and popular examples of that type of presentation, but they aren't the cause of it nor do I blame them. it's like mentioning the term: Whedonspeak, which is when a movie tends to have dialogue that heavily relies on quips, usually in sarcastic or self-referential manner to describe either a character/situation or the entire pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:06 PM
–

Even so, it's relatively new. Most men that are in their early to late 20s still grew up with the disney-romanticization of female sexuality that was perpetuated in almost every type of media/colloquial culture. Unless you grew up in "abnormal" cultures, like impoverished areas and what not, you were taught that women valued virtues over attractiveness, and any time somebody would claim otherwise, they would be heavily criticized.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:58 AM
3

If you dont like how feminists see male sexuality as disgusting and degrading…..how about calling out loudmouths normalizing toxic behavior as “men being men” and/or blaming women for that toxic behavior? This happens constantly in any and every form of levels of society. In schools, in colleges, in the professional setting, in the legal settings etc etc. Do some scenarios slip through the cracks? Of course, but virtually anybody that has been born at least from the late 1980s to now in the west…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:40 PM
4

TBF it's not any attention, but they lose most of the attention, which is par for the course for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 12:35 AM
2

If you really want somebody to deconstruct OP's points I'll gladly take the lead: In his first topic, his argument is that not every woman inherently looks for casual sex and therefore there is very little point of a guy being a chad because most women won't have casual sex. Which is true. But nobody is arguing otherwise. Nobody is arguing that chad will make every woman drop their panties in a flash the moment they enter a room, they argue that if a woman is OPEN to the IDEA of a casual sex, sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:14 PM
14

My brother in christ, you are literally engaging in a post that is using one of the most said phrases by women online explaining why it is stupid and not accurate to what women really feel and think about all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:28 PM
–

Person A: laughs and makes fun of fat person. Person B: "Hey, you shouldn't make fun of fat people." Person A: "Shut up, I can do what I want, because it's legal, you can't tell me what I can make fun off." Less than 24 hours pass Person A is now fat. Person A now wants nobody to make fun of them for being fat. Person B now laughs at them. Person A: "Hey you are a hypocrite!" Person B: "I'm not laughing at you because you are fat, I'm laughing at you because you made fun of other fat people, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:27 PM
–

user comments:"explain how this isn’t hypocritical" another user responds to that comment and explains why it isn't original user types: "i love having a man confidently educate me, a woman, on how women think and why they do the things they do it will truly never get old" Somehow user thinks they are in the right ???? profit Don't want people to reply to you? Don't ask questions. That simple. I didn't even realize you were a woman until i read your reply to me, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:59 PM
–

It's not hypocritical because nobody went ahead and made an app to target, belittle, and defame women anonymously, without any verifiable info. Tea app did that for men, most of the women who downloaded that app didn't because of "security" or because of their actual abusive experiences, they did so to both drama farm/read and to defame their benign, but negative experiences of the men they dated. Ironically, the app that claimed to be made for the "security" of women, turned to be have been... …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:54 PM
1

I did. The majority of the jobs were nonsensical. Hence why I mentioned the first one to highlight how atupid most of them are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 05:51 PM
-1

oki-doki. women's health not being studied? Women's health differences are being studied, tho... that's why we know they sometimes have different symptoms than men... just like we know that black people are more prone to sickle-cell, etc. autism and adhd being underdiagnosed in girls? female oral contraceptives and not male ones? Trust me, a majority of men would gladly take contraceptives if it meant not having to worry about going in raw. The difference is that women make one egg per month, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:52 PM
5

I highly doubt it. Wasn't there a website that was dedicated to exposing models/attractive women in IG that were either or were willing to be paid to be prostitutes in Dubai, even to the point of having sex with literal children/animals and have the men defecate on them and then have the woman eat it? Wasn't that website shut down for the same reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 10:45 PM
3

Very few women only focus on the physical part. They want partners they have shit in common with. Men are more likely to only focus on physical attraction. If that was true, there wouldn't be so many complaints from women about the men they date. How the basic "standards" are on the floor etc etc. They primarily choose on looks, and hope the man fits, the problem is that the man that is attractive enough for women to ignore red flags, will continue to do red flags because they know that even if …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 10:13 PM
2

How many women have you cold approached? I have been on a steady relationship right now for like a month or so... And I repeatedly made it clear that men are to do this with multiple women. Not “putting their eggs in the same basket”. And you don't understand that you can do this while still cold approaching women on the regularly, which is what TRP and PUA tactics already promoted, if you bothered to read the books. But if we are talking about what is the best way to get a date, by only choosin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:31 PM
0

Because you last thread pressumed too much. You argued that it's better to put your eggs in the same basket and hope that it either sprouts or doesn't: Most of the men here don’t seem to understand the concept of getting to know a woman over time. For example, if you see a pretty lady who goes for walks around your neighborhood daily, say hi every time you see her. Make some small talk. After a while get to know her name and if she seems interested or not. If she doesn’t, then don’t ask her out.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:23 PM
2

So in this case the people with more power determined that being emotional is bad and being stoic is good. That's literally NOT the purpose or what the study is trying to show. The whole point of the study if there is a link between verifiable DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS, that are ALREADY standardized in psychology and checking if there is a LINK between somebody THINKING that somebody else criticized them. Nobody is arguing that being stoic is good, just that feeling like you received negative criticis…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:13 PM
2

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-025-03322-6 If you bothered to read at least the abstract of the study, you would have learned how they determined the standards of the study: Data were from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (waves 1–9; 2002–2019). Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 8-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, and a cut-off value of ≥4 was used to define clinically significant depressive symptoms. We included participants aged ≥50…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:40 PM
-2

You said men came with up with the "sensitivity standard" and that's why we shouldn't use it as a real standard. I said, funny, because women came up with all of these different buzzwords, and yet all of those words act like Schrodinger's cat, they all are simultaneously everything, and nothing at the same time, only when it is convenient to the feminists, do they have any actual definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:33 PM
2

This is from a 100% male perspective "The data also revealed a clear difference between men and women. Women were more likely than men to report depressive symptoms in response to perceived criticism across all categories. For instance, women who reported even a little criticism from a spouse, child, or friend were more likely to experience depression during the follow-up period. For men, only those who reported a lot of criticism seemed to be at increased risk." It's been said here before that …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:30 PM
-2

Ironically, isn't that why the terms "Toxic Masculinity", "Masculinity" "Femininity" are all over the place? Because women/feminists use them to mean whatever they want at any given time?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:26 PM
2

Maybe, but social standing also plays a role in men's attractiveness, femcels will still probably ignore the average guy if he's socially awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 01:22 AM
4

Oh BTW, check out my edit, decided to be extra petty and search out his reddit account: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1m2cj40/female_extremists_and_male_extremists_mutually/n3omzed/ Dude is actually roleplaying lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:06 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if this is the same person managing the Lillith account. Both of them engage the same exact way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:16 PM
9

You have 144,276 Karma. Holy shit I have 125,798 and I've been a redditor for 8-9 years. Jesus.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:10 PM
7

What you and those communities did is called: Argument from fallacy An argument from fallacy is the idea that even if a person's argument itself is fallacious or not, is not, in itself, proof that the conclusion stemming from that argument is false. An example taken from wikipedia: Alice: All cats are animals. Ginger is an animal. Therefore, Ginger is a cat. Bob: You have just fallaciously affirmed the consequent. You are incorrect. Therefore, Ginger is not a cat. Whether or not Alice is correct…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:05 PM
–

Considering the way he replies to the comments, pretty sure the person behind that account is just role-playing a person they really aren't. Like I have rarely seen an account online as blatant in their lies as that account. What a weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:55 PM
7

He was banned from a feminism sub for being anti-feminist. No he wasn't. The post itself that got OP banned is right there. It is EXACTLY what people complain about tribalism communities. That communities would rather outright reject or deny an issue, rather than address it, and the communities themselves outright proved OP's assertion by banning the post and OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:53 PM
3

It isn't relevant to the discussion at all. Unironically your comments only read as if you are entirely roleplaying a person you really aren't. Which I would bet my left nut that it would be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:51 PM
8

Who Is outright banning? https://i.imgur.com/ksfrY4G.png OP literally provided evidence of mods from those communities banning his post and OP. If you bothered to actually read said post you would have known this. Again, you are just proving my point entirely brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:47 PM
6

I added that detail because it’s a pertinent detail. Whether or not she was a FWB has no bearing on the actual discussion of both the post itself, or your fake quote of "her". It was just placed there to try to appear better than what you really are. It's usually used by most people when they lie while they tell a story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:44 PM
5

Nah, i actually had a feminist friend who I used to debate in college (she became a FWB for a bit) so I actually have real world experience with real feminists I think the fact that you had to include that she was a "FWB", only serves to prove that she's most likely a work of fiction in order to self-aggrandize your social value and somehow appeal to an authority. Which is a massive fallacy to begin with. But hey, more power to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:38 PM
11

No, the only delusion here is out of your own creation. OP tried to bring up a topic inside multiple other communities only to be met with instant bans and refusals to engage or criticize said topic entirely. The fact that it was entirely done online has no bearing on the merits (or lack thereof) of the topic itself. You can argue that OP was wrong, or that OP is incorrect, which they very well may be, but instead of engaging in said topic and picking apart it's flaws, they would rather just out…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:35 PM
–

Person creates a post trying to address how extremism of an ideology that actively targets a group, can lead people of said group into siding with a different ideology to defend themselves Shows evidence of multiple communities related to the first ideology banning their posts and refusing to engage, without providing any criticism random redditor high on his own farts then replies to the post, with his own quote, while trying to pass it off as if somebody else said it in order to sound smart: “…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:22 PM
15

Out of curiousty I searched that quote online and only found his comments. Pretty sure he's just quoting himself. Made this edit after 50 or so minutes: Since I woke up today on the wrong side of the bed, and decided to be petty, I searched his quote with reddit's own comment searcher, here's what I found: In this very same thread, the dude said that the quote "Came" from a former "FWB" feminist friend he had: Nah, i actually had a feminist friend who I used to debate in college (she became a FW…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:10 PM
0

Aggressive means trying to harm others. Sigh... Let's look at the dictionary: 1.A: tending toward or exhibiting aggression aggressive behavior 1.B: marked by combative readiness an aggressive fighter 2.A: marked by obtrusive energy and self-assertiveness a rude, aggressive personality 2.B: marked by driving forceful energy or initiative : enterprising an aggressive salesman 3: strong or emphatic in effect or intent aggressive colors aggressive flavors 4: growing, developing, or spreading rapidly…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:49 PM
1

I wasn't trying to sleep with those women and broke off those types of relationships once I realized that's how they would always treat me. That's the funny thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 04:43 PM
8

I think the proposal of befriending women in the hopes one of them matches you up with another distant friend, to be wildly overstated. You can befriend women, but don't expect anything other than maybe genuine friendship back. The amount of instances that I have personally seen a guy join a mixed or mainly female group, that managed to get at least a date from a friend of the female friends not in the group, is 5. Out of those 5, 4 of them were friends of the group for at least 3-6 months, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:31 PM
4

The term "Aggressive" in that sentence doesn't specifically mean trying to actively harm somebody else. Also, that sub is heavily moderated now after getting kicked off the default sub list, primarily because of those types of posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 09:21 PM
67

Insert all the Buzzfeed articles rating male olympians and other athletes by their bulges
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:05 AM
14

https://redditmetis.com/user/BrightAutumn12 They are from India.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:51 AM
16

I don't know that OP is a typical male. I also don't believe they're from a Western country. https://redditmetis.com/user/BrightAutumn12 He's indian, so take what he says with a grain of salt. In my experience, they tend to roleplay other ethnicities/countries of origin when they are online.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 01:49 AM
1

I'm just pointing it out because lots of men here don't believe in professional help and get mad whenever someone mentions it. Because nowadays, especially younger women tend to use therapy as a catch-all dismissal of problems. In this sub, we mostly talk about the societal tendencies/trends/problems caused by male-female social dynamics. We aren't necessarily talking about the individual case by case basis. The problem is that again, men here bring up either problems that are caused by society …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:59 AM
4

Most men wouldn't want either the heat or the blackmail sex. Some men would. Find a hole and you will eventually find a man willing to put his dick in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:39 PM
14

My comment: If a young woman increasingly finds herself dating horrible men, it is entirely their own fault, just like an attractive young man who finds himself consistently dating horrible women. You; I mean you can say the same thing about men who have horrible dating experiences as well. Person can write yet cannot read, more news at 11.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:47 PM
35

Women may find it hard to find a suitable partner I think the problem is that it's almost entirely their own fault. They have numerous men seeking to date the woman. They have the options, and they control the men who are allowed to date them by setting whatever standards they want to. If a young woman increasingly finds herself dating horrible men, it is entirely their own fault, just like an attractive young man who finds himself consistently dating horrible women. Both these kinds of people s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:35 PM
2

->"guys can experience trauma from rejection" -> "Nuh Uh" -> I link a source that explains how repeated rejection can cause trauma -> random reply snarkly requotes half a sentence that says that men who have trauma from rejection should seek professional help as if that's either a clap back or somehow invalidates my reply itself My dude. The whole reason why I linked that source is because women were arguing that rejection can not cause trauma, when in fact, it can. Your reply is meaningless and…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:07 PM
3

Nobody is saying that we have to combat this. The person above me was trying to rationalize how men can't get trauma from rejection, showed them otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:51 AM
–

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1394653/Move-to-outlaw-secret-DNA-testing-by-fathers.html This was one of the original proposals done in the UK for a similar law. It states clearly that it had both to do with children not being able consent to their own DNA sampling, and therefore unethical and because it would bring psychological damage to the child. I agree with the first portion of the reasoning, but the second one, which is what was disputed in this very comment section, unfortunatel…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 12:43 AM
–

DNA testing a child does not cause direct harm to the child. It is not an invasive procedure. It would only cause indirect harm if it turned out that the father is not the child's biological father.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 12:19 AM
5

Ngl I would have too. Random girl drives your car, takes you someplace else that very well could be extremely isolated. That sounds like the start of a group assault, theft or murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:09 PM
6

Hmmmmm: https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/love-sex/what-is-rejection-trauma-and-what-are-the-signs/amp_etphotostory/102198502.cms Rejection trauma, also known as rejection-sensitive dysphoria (RSD), is a psychological disorder where there is an intense emotional response when someone is rejected or criticised. It can affect an individual's emotional well-being, self-esteem, and social interactions. It may not be recognised as a formal diagnosis in …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:04 PM
–

"Regarded" is to skirt terms of service, a popular lingo right now in internet culture: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Well%20regarded Like I said. Regarded. But considering you didn't understand it, you would probably be one of those people that would respond to popular internet references with the "correct" grammar not understanding that the incorrect spelling of the word itself points to a specific reference like: "Nothing personnel kid." There's a specific popular term for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 10:22 PM
–

The sentence is clear as day. Stop being purposely obtuse. Oh BTW, if you are simply too regarded to understand the sentences above, let me spell it out for you: Clear as day = very easy to see or understand. Purposely obtuse = deliberately refusing to understand a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 05:01 PM
11

It's also that at least for me, most women that I have been friends with, have treated our friendship in almost entirely transactional one-way. I have to hear her, I have to help her, I have to do her favors, I have to make an effort to be present, I have to accommodate for my presence (gotta keep my emotions positive, any negative emotions can be perceived as either wimpy or abusive) etc, all of that flows one way, and it's to them. If I need help, they aren't necessarily going to do the same s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:09 PM
1

Well, that's because TRP also preaches hot and cold games Which are essentially shit tests women unconsciously employ already. But it's only a problem when men do it. ☕️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:34 PM
1

Oh, bullshit. Women have been running for office more, and winning more for the last century, but especially over the last couple of decades. I would hope so, considering that it's been ~140 years since they were allowed to work and 105 years since society recognized their right to vote. You now: But it's also disingenuous not to acknowledge that yes, it's a lot more work and a lot more risk if you're a woman. Me back a single comment: I'm puertorican, AKA a latino, if I want to run for presiden…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:00 PM
3

Women who do run for (and women who win races) also receive a disproportionate amount of harassment, threats and violence. As do people of color. And yet women refuse to vote for women officials. And before we get into some bullshit about how women just need to be braver - remember that plenty of white men are leaving office because of harassment and threats to their families. If you want to break the glass ceiling, somebody has to climb and break it themselves. That's the problem I personally h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 06:42 PM
8

Ever seen the show Alone? It leaves people alone in the wilderness for a few months to see how well they survive alone. In isolation from the pressures of society, the men almost uniformly begin to let themselves cry and be more sentimental than they do when they're around people. Ever seen the show The Island with Bear Gryllis?, in one of the seasons, men and women were grouped by their gender and left to themselves Men thrived while women almost starved to the point of needing to be flown out,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 05:11 PM
7

SOME men try to lead. Many of them fail. Which again, demonstrates how obviously it doesn't come naturally to men. Are you being obtuse on purpose? I'm saying that there is a clear difference between men naturally seeking leadership and actually being good leaders. The "naturally" part of my arguments comes from an innate drive to want to lead, not because I think they all become good leaders. It still remains true that MOST men don't lead. MOST men follow just as comfortably as women. Most men …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 04:44 PM
7

Which clearly disproves both the idea that men are naturally good at leading and that women are naturally submissive and need to be lead. First of all, I never said that men are naturally good leaders, I said that men are naturally TRY to lead and seek leadership positions. Big difference. Second, the outliers of trends don't disprove the trends itself. If men are on average taller than women, does that mean that no woman is taller than an average man? No, it doesn't. Just because some women hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:55 PM
9

Why are people taking words in the very literal sense? The reason humans explored was because some humans wandered out from their "cozy" known lands and went out, these people often had to lead groups or were lead by another. I'm using ancient humanity's exploration of unknown lands to explain how leaders naturally came to be. It's an analogy. Some people wanted to venture beyond, and often they had to lead others that would follow them that did not have the same drive as them to explore. I also…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 12:19 PM
8

And if men want relationships they should just get one. That's all it takes. If they don't, it's their own fault. Not society The difference between the two, is that women have more control in BOTH the people that get elected and dating. Women control both barriers of entry. If a person runs for office, he has a higher chance of getting elected if they focus more on women's issues than men's. They are not the same issues. Not even at a glance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:01 AM
6

You need a citation that “not all men in leadership roles are good at leadership”? That somehow, all women in leadership roles do excellent. People who are natural leaders don’t complain that people don’t do what they want. They use their natural leadership skills to inspire people to do things. This is VERY modern take on leadership, btw. Do you think the men that were living in caves actively tried to charismaticaly navigate his group's lazyness or insubordination? Let me tell you, it wasn't. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:59 AM
6

It's not mysoginy. Like run for office. And vote for them. That's all it takes. If women don't want to, it's their own fault. Not society or the boogey "misoginy" man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:52 AM
14

Nah, that was starvation You do understand that risk-seeking is not just used when it's for fun activities, right? If a group is starving, the risk-seekers will be the ones that will go out and try to get food for the rest. It could be argued that leaders don't take risks Leaders do take risks. It's why we do value them so much. They take risks because they HAVE to keep their group alive and thriving while navigating their current circumstances, and if they fail, they either die or be shunned by…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:48 AM
10

Men are more likely to be PUT in leadership roles. That doesn’t mean men are naturally good leaders. As proven by how many men suck in leadership positions (and how many women do excellent.) Citation needed. If men were natural leaders, there wouldn’t be so many men on this sub complaining that they don’t want to have to be in charge of planning dates or asking women out. Men in this sub complain about having to be in charge of courting without ever having anything in return. If a guy has to do …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:45 AM
24

Risk-seeking behavior is what led to humans crossing seas, trekking jungle, and moving place to place. The idea is that risk-seekers are more prone to leadership roles because if they fail, they risk more. Yes, risk-seeking =/= leadership, but being a leader and making DECISIONS involves TAKING risks. A naturally risk-avoidant person will not naturally choose to place themselves in a leadership role, hence why men are often looking and being placed in leadership roles more than women are. That's…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:34 AM
43

We aren’t actually naturally dominant nor are we more likely to succeed. The sooner we stop pushing narratives that men are naturally “superior”, the sooner we’ll stop expecting men to naturally be superior. That's not true at all. Men are more likely to take on leadership roles or take risks in general. The REASON why not every man is in leadership roles is that NOT EVERYBODY can be a captain of a crew. Nobody is saying that men are naturally superior, but the idea that men somehow aren't typic…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:29 AM
11

I assure you, nobody cares about a 25 year old dating a 21 year old outside of a few, very radical voices. I read somewhere that the average relationship age gap is around 3 years, and it's usually the man that is older. Which makes sense. Women want a guy that is slightly more established than people of her age, without them being in a completely different world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:23 AM
7

If “preselection” is real, and girls are supposed to be more attracted to guys they know other girls want Preselection only works if you have demonstrated you can pull a girl. Preselection doesn't supersede a guy's neediness to a specific girl. I knew a guy in high school that every girl in our class had a crush on, but he was so hyper-fixated on a girl from an entirely different class, that his neediness outshone everything else. Dude was getting massively curved along by that girl, and he stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 11:59 PM
3

Their image is a "have to". Celebrities are run by marketing teams. Again, ALL GENDERS have to go through that inside the industry. If you are employed with a fashion company, obviously they will tell you what to wear, the whole point is that you are going to sell the product they want you to sell. If you don't wish to do so, you can refuse the contract in the first place. There's nothing that she says in that video that even remotely affects only women in the industry. ... Yeah, as I said, male…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:25 PM
6

The problem is that you are inevitably going to run into the "and who set that system up?" & "patriarchy hurts men too" narratives. Exhibit A
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:14 PM
5

Male popstars don't have to be good either. They can also be hot. But their hotness isn't used to reduce them in the same way- even if he is clearly beloved for being hot, it's still perfectly acceptable for him to wear normal clothes during presentations. In places like the Oscars, MOST people dress formally, because that's the point. It's a formal event. The people that dress provocatively do so because they WANT to, not because they are FORCED to. I want to know what type of female pop-stars …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 08:01 PM
11

Women are told they won't be good at math or science. And yet, women continue to succeed in math and science careers. Maybe in the 90s. Since the beginning of this century, society has now actively done whatever it takes to push more and more women into stem fields. Take accountability. Stop blaming women for some men's refusal to adapt Again. Ironic. Men's issues are personal issues because they are lazy bums. Women's issues are a sign of a troubled society, and we MUST fix them together.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:46 PM
10

That would be incorrect. It isn't. Yup, because young men refuse to have a job or training or education unless there's a promise of pussy. Like I said mamy times before in this sub. An individual's education is one of the most important building blocks of their lives and will determine a lot. When you are born in a society that actively demonizes your behavior and has a megative bias based on your gender identity, it's not a surprise that a majority of these people look at education in a negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:38 PM
13

Homelessness issues have hundreds of nonprofits. And most of those are either intandem with domestic violence shelters, meaning they tend to primarily help women or try to do 50/50 which is numerically not feasable because that means that a disproportionate amount of those funds are being used to help women, because 2 out of 3 homeless people are men, meaning women get 2x as much help as men do in this specific issue. Men's issues are taken seriously and addressed. Not really and if so, they onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:26 PM
–

I checked it out of curiousity and humor. I was like: "No way is a woman unironically calling a guy an incel for replying to one of her comments in a debate sub, right?" I was pleasantly incorrect. Also, in my experience, the women that always immediately jump into using the incel insult in this sub tend to be women that frequent autism subs. Don't know if it means something, but it's something I have seen a couple of times now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 09:44 AM
–

Last night, in this very sub, a woman called me an incel because I responded to her comments too long in a chain. Lmao, not wrong: http://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1jz0s4c/men_are_not_simple_creatures_they_have_complex/mn4yp08/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 09:36 AM
–

https://youtube.com/shorts/Wq1ajCGpt9U This you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 12:06 AM
9

Anything over 5 imo is too much imo. Maybe it's cuz I'm 28 now and my feelings might change with age, but I feel like having at least a 5 year gap puts both parties in different lifestyles and experiences already.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:09 PM
21

Yeah, even as a guy, I find those gaps creepy at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:06 PM
17

Because women can sexually satisfy themselves with toys and their own privacy, and men either can't, or think they can't. Lmao, pretty sure most men masturbate at rates far higher than women. The reason as to why women can stay off of romantic relationships is becaise they can get all the benefits of having a romantic relationship from their other groups. Friends, FWBs, the offshoot orbiter they can talk to any time they want etc. It's not cuz men don't have as many masturbatory toys lmao. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:45 PM
2

☕️
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:45 PM
0

Someone who cares about their relationship doesnt ignore This cuts both ways. She has as much responsibility as him. after the second or third she’s ‘nagged’ about the same thing. "Nagged" is passive complaining. Hence why. If it was actually a problem she should approach him just as much as he has to look out for these "nags" and pinpoint the issue. The problem often times is that women stay quiet, or just passively drop hints, hints that CAN be brushed off as just simple annoyance, and then th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 09:31 PM
2

It late. It shouldnt take blackmail for a guy to give a shit. You shouldnt be ignoring your wifes’s/girlfriend’s problems because you think you can away with it. Telling somebody else that you are having problems in the relationship is completely different from either blackmailing/ultimatum or passively letting the problem fester, specially if the other party doesn't even realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 09:02 PM
19

Thats not the point, the point is having a 400 page manual about dating is so lame and dorky, just like TRP itself. I find it funny how non redpillers describe and belittle the red pill like this . Imagine this thought process: be man who struggles with social interactions and dating, the so-called dorks, autistics, social rejects, neurotics of the social herirarchy find community of other men like themselves, a select few individuals of this community start experimenting on things that work for…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:51 PM
3

Are you pretending that LGBT and “immigranuts/refugeees” don’t include young men? I'm an immigrant. Technically. I'm puertorican born in PR, now living in Mass. I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that the left does not particularly care about young male immigrants, it's mostly children or women that are destitute seeking asylum which they focus all of their resources on. Do they technically include them under the umbrella term "immigrant/refugee"? Yes, they are included, but in reality t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:33 PM
5

Not all women make bad decisions over and over, and the ones who do, don’t engage with them because it’s drama you don’t need, but they still have right to make the same bad decisions if that’s what they choose to do. TBF at least for most young men in general, they don't have "beef" with women who do either of those things. It's the ones that keep choosing wrong, then go on to social media/ their friends/ other men to complain how all men are like these assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:25 PM
3

Reinforcing victimhood and white supremacy isn’t concrete advice, it encourages violence. . Modern American progressivism has left young men in the dust. They're focused on promoting young women's rights and LGBT rights and immigrant/refugee rights and so many other groups. They see young men neutrally at best and outright enemies at worst. As a result, men join toxic communities because at least they're welcome there. The entire quote you tried to summarize paints a completely different picture…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:20 PM
1

when people argue that access to sex and dates is more important than housing or employment. Tbf both of these things womem have the men beat too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 08:56 AM
4

Bullshit. You can find many examples of women talking about the same dichotomy, but in different words. The "Looking good, Susan" HR meme is a meme for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:42 AM
5

The current Passive or sedentary educational system heavily favors women and that's not including the major bias teachers generally have in favor of women, from childhood all the way to the very top of Academia.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 01:36 PM
-5

Um this is …. It sounds honestly like direct propaganda to push society towards a state where women have less reproductive control. It’s scary How is propaganda for less reproductive rights when the OP is saying they should get themselves checked out and follow medical proffesionals? If anything, OP is sahing the opposite. So just because birth control is an overall positive for women, we should somehow dismiss all the negative side effects that could impact a woman's life because people like yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:04 PM
11

Yeah, lmao. They want vulnerability for all the sappy, easy shit. Oh, dog died in a movie, and my bf cried? <33333 Oh, he got fired, and his friend died, and he's depressed and crying? Break up immediately. Fucking loser. He got sexually assaulted when he was a child and harbored great trauma from it. Why do I feel less attacted to him now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 11:05 AM
7

Asked a simple question. Is it rational to give a chance to a guy that is one step away from a dv charge? The weird furtive guys however have not accepted that their dysfunction is theirs and they are responsible for making the accommodations for those aspects of their behaviour that just freak people out. As other people pointed out, the meek and furtive men are often than not trying to accomodate for their nature. Which is why women walk all over them. They know they come of a furtive, so they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:12 AM
6

Is it entirely rational to give a guy that looks like he's one step away from a DV charge a chance then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:49 AM
8

Irrelevant, because if women truly feared men that looked like they could hurt them, then so many of them wouldn't slip on their dicks all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:46 AM
–

Going to the gym doesn't give a woman curves Weight training does tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:30 PM
–

How is it pick me when she's saying shit like: What I fail to see is why women should care at all. Why should women give up their good time to date men they aren't interested in? Why should women's sacrifice their happiness to save men? Why should I get involved with a man I'm not viscerally attracted to in order to help them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:27 PM
1

But what you are suggesting is that average can’t get women. Generally speaking no, they cannot. That’s why when dudes complain about this whole hypergamy thing, I just don’t believe it because it’s not my experience. Maybe you are being too humble with yourself, and you are higher value than you give yourself credit for.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:56 PM
1

Wouldn't it be much more productive to start with an assumption that women's mechanisms of psychosexual attraction cannot be altered whatsoever? Yes. Which is why TRP laughs at people trying to change the current dating market, because it's just impossible. The proposed solution would only happen in a fantasy world. he core proposed solution of TRP makes no sense because you can't talk your way out of brain chemistry. No, again. You are conflating two things. One, TRP as a whole, never wants or …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:53 PM
1

I don’t think I’m a top % man. But I have a corporate job that pays well, stay in good shape, and have developed good social skills through years of working on it. I don’t think that makes me top %. It’s basically just what men should be doing anyway because it gives purpose. Good, because nobody here is suggesting otherwise. You are average, and most men are average. Which is what I said. If you are in your late 20s/early 30s and are out of shape and don’t have a career, you’re not average. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:23 PM
1

The framework of the redpill yes. But I'm talking about OP's mention of what redpillers proposed as a societal solution. Which according to OP: The solution proposed is that these women settle down very early with undesirable men (because as is established, desirable men have options and men with options don't commit to women). The purpose of TRP is not to find a societal solution, or anything of that nature. The purpose of TRP is to make best use of the current dating fiasco. That's why "Enjoy …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:22 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about man? How does anything you said in this reply have ANYTHING to do with what I said. Sounds like unhinged rambling ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:17 PM
1

Oof, Bell’s palsy or Trigeminal neuralgia? I’m sorry, two people I’ve loved have suffered though that. My friend with TN pretty much lost her mind from the relentless pain, and the fact that the condition doesn’t show. TN is genuinely horrifying, for what it's worth, I would take BP any day compared to that. I feel for your friend. You aren’t the first man I’ve seen make this claim, and it’s either a confession or a projection of how men feel about unattractive women. Women have no value whatsoe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:38 AM
4

Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:22 AM
16

Crickets, huh. Every single point made by red pillers contradicts the thing they said five minutes ago. I went to sleep after getting home from work. Have a temporary condition in which half my face is paralyzed and feels like my nerves has been hit by a train and a boxer at the same time. So I take a quick nap when it feels the worst. They also assume that a man a woman is attracted to must be in the top 20%, when it simply means: the man I’m most compatible with and also want to have sex with.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 12:55 AM
8

Yeah...? If you can't attract the top percentile of men, then drop your standards a little, yeah. That should go for both men and women, but women tend to ignore that and complain about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:33 PM
0

But that's not what TRP says. It doesn't say hey, hurt yourself because it's good. It says that you must focus on being a better version of yourself, and sometimes it might hurt, but you will be better off later. If that's the case, then literally anything that doesn't derive instant gratification would be considered masochistic epistemology.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:29 PM
-5

I did add to OP's discussion, but you both here were circlejerking each other off with strawmen. Can't really add to a strawman argument since that would defeat the entire point of a strawman. Also, no, I didn't say you lack reading comprehension because we have different views, I said you lack reading comprehension because you took my entire comment and reduced it to: So just more blaming on women or literally anyone else instead of taking accountability yourself, gotcha. Which either means you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:25 PM
-4

Considering most people can't read above 6th grade level, yet most of the world keeps running just fine. you being able to type a few sentences should not be taken as a contradiction to what I said. Esecially when part of being able to read is to comprehend the writing, aka reading comprehension, which is what you do lack according to the last time we "spoke" to one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:19 PM
0

Aren't you the dude that can't read? Did you learn how to yet or do you still just default to making strawmans and then fighting them to stroke your ego?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:08 PM
78

The solution proposed is that these women settle down very early with undesirable men (because as is established, desirable men have options and men with options don't commit to women). You are conflating undesirable men and average men. Nobody is saying that hot women should go for average men, but average women whom clearly cannot keep a top 10% man, should lower their standards a little bit and to maybe give other men in the top 20 or top 30% a chance. Again, they are undesirable men, to wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:06 PM
4

You literally said "the gender that gets coddled". Women get raped and murdered by their so called protectors everyday. And more men get killed by men everyday, and men get raped by women every day, mostly children. What's your point? They get paid less THEY DON'T! Fucking hell, don't tell me you actually still believe in the gender pay gap when that shit hasnt been brought up since the 2010s after it's been debunked multiple times AND gets debunked multiple times still. they can't make their ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:50 AM
4

I NEVER SAID EVERYTHING is easier for women. Just that MOST things are easier for women in the modern world we live in. Right now, they are not held by any gender stereotypes or roles. They are not beholden to anybody else to self-sustain themselves. Mass media coddles them and tells them their farts are worth diamonds. Online dating is a joke for them, an ego stroke. Academia and the entire education system ACTIVELY promotes them and discriminates against young boys and men. Women are treated M…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:34 AM
5

There we go, the classic "just be trans bro" argument. Again if the purpose of somebody wanting to have real world privileges compared to having online priviliges, why would a man want to transition to a woman in the first place? When trans-women face just as much or often the case MORE discrimination in real life than average men do. What is this asinine argument you are trying to make? Peak ledditor speak. Again, no reading comprehension whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:26 AM
9

Lmao. Reading comprehension must be difficult for you, isn't it? I would rather be the gender that gets coddled in real life and gets criticized online than be the gender that gets held to every standard in real life and only has a select few places to vent about society's double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:10 AM
5

Welcome to the Age of Intellectualism introduced by the Far Right. Neither women nor academia are responsible for men’s blind obedience to authority, and no one but men can be blamed for gobbling up and spreading anti-education propaganda. That’s all on men, who brought this on themselves. This is what you sought rabidly, enjoy basking in the victory. Are you dumb? Or just acting? This discrimination was being introduced by the left since the 70s. What are you on about? Trump and the far right d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:41 PM
5

Dude colleges didn’t accept women until well into the 20th century. Yale and Harvard didn’t accept female students until the 70s. And now women outnumber men in colleges. Now, the schooling system has been actively disparaging and discriminating against young boys since their early childhoods. And now the top levels of Academia discriminate against men and actively pushes harmful ideas that further incentivize hurting current men for the actions of.men in the past. And now young women out earn y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 10:48 PM
8

where's the accountability from most of the men? The accountability happens in the real world. Men for the most part here, debate to vent, in the real world, very few of them would ever say everything they say here, and for good reason, they would get ostracized for having those views. Men by default are always treated like they are at fault, or at the very least that they have a sense of responsibility and accountability for what happens in their lives, even outside of their control. Cuz that's…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 10:18 PM
0

The person I replied to mentioned that women chose to stop working, i said that in these cases, the men that were working were most likely putting themselves at risk of DYING by going outside. I didn't say all women chose to not work, nor that women in jobs such as nursing werent often times even more heroic than the men. I just said that in the scenario the person chose to highlight, men were still putting themselves at risk for their families. When I read that part of the comment it read to me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:32 AM
0

Possibly, but the men were putting themselves at higher risk than the women in these scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:23 AM
0

lockdown saw more women then men sacrifice their employment to care for children. Wouldn't this also mean that men were more likely to end up sick during covid, ergo they were sacrificing their lives for the family?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:42 AM
2

If it goes bad, that's on them. And the complaining is them venting which every person is entitled to. Not when they paint an entire collection of peole by the actions of few bad apples. If women where doing the same rants they do to men online towards black pekple, or any other race the world would be in flames. Women live everyday hearing bs about women collectively and for the most part they rant about it and move on Because society actively renounces, shuts down and attack people that talk t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:49 AM
11

How attractive a man inspires doubt in a woman. "Maybe he's not creepy, maybe he's just akward." "Maybe he's not nerdy, just eccentric." Etc etc. It might not DIRECTLY inspire safety, but it does inspire them to think about the actions attractive men do in a possible new light that they might as well never would have done for an average or ugly man. That's the problem. The women already feel the meed to excuse the man's behavior before she even knows the guy. But the same doesn't happen for aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:43 AM
–

As a man for the stupid flair bot: As a man, I can’t say this matches the reality I’ve experienced (male, middle aged, northern Europe). In my world, relationships feel much more like a two-way street, where both partners contribute significantly. While I absolutely agree that men should pull their weight and not see housework or emotional labor as "helping," I also don’t see men being widely celebrated for simply meeting these standards. Mostly the complaints women have are in two ways: Dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 11:06 PM
–

A man will be praised for “babysitting” his own kids. As long as it's not outside you mean. Try going into a playground full of mothers and children. I used to get mean looks when I picked up my 8 year old cousin from a public playground, and I was 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:43 PM
4

And why would that hurt me? Am I not human? You are moving goalposts You asked WHY would they do that. I gave you the most obvious answer. Because they want to hurt you Sure it's not supposed to happen, bur if it wasn't an effective tactic, women wouldn’t do that, or hell PEOPLE wouldn't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 08:44 PM
8

Another thread, another young dude that knows nothing, speaks from either ignorance, privilege or both and then thinks calling the less fortunate to suck it up is somehow gonna change their mindset. A conversation on Insta where dudes didn't want to open up to their girlfriends because they'd "hold It against them". Which first off, why would they do that? Because at the time where they bring it up against you, they do it to hurt you? To emasculate you? Like huh? Which first off, why would they …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 02:07 AM
6

That doesn't mean there isn't male sexualixation in media. Hugh Jackman was literally sexually harassed during the set of X-Men's Origins: Wolverine when he was supposed to do the pool of adamantium scene by all the women in the staff. Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Robbert Pattinson, Zac Efron, etc. all have talked about the abuse of steroids to keep their unnatural unattainable physiques that hollywood wants to promote because that's their ideal beauty standard. How about every highschool-colle…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 02:37 PM
3

But that’s not something your gonna know until you’ve dated them for a while Which is why I said it's funny how older women just tell younger women to not date old men, as if there was an epidemic of old attractive men swaying young women left and right. Instead of telling young women the TRUE red flags they should look out for, they go for the glaringly obvious, as if young women already don't date old men to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:33 PM
5

Lack of commitment, emotional or sexual coercion, guard mating, violent tendencies, lack of manners, lack of basic hygiene (and no, it's not the creep/incel types that struggle with hygene that women go for, it's the attractive guys that refuse to wipe their own ass) lack of attentiveness, etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:26 PM
3

Men “women need to pick better and take responsibility for their dating choices” Women “your right, we’ll avoid obvious red flags snd help earn younger women spot them, ie single men 35+ that go fir teenagers” Not disagreeing on the premise, but it's kind of funny how the majority of the red flags women tend to ignore have nothing to do with age, since most women date around their age anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 05:16 PM
11

How exactly does a girl/girl relationship function? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4E8qEDi_xg According to a couple of bi women I know, this video sums it up at least for the initial dating stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 08:33 PM
8

with the Rangers Always knew those park rangers were gay. They be fucking all over them woods letting bears watch them play. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 08:29 PM
14

The implication that the guy is already attractive to begin with. They deny the idea that most women filter 80% of men in a day to day basis due to them not being attractive even when they actively admit so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:59 AM
30

You have women here actively deny that very same argument at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:37 AM
20

Reminder that right after "MeToo" trend solidified itself in the workplace, men in managerial roles and other higher positions took a step back, stopped mentoring women altogether, and became more concious of the way they acted around their female peers. The results? Women crying that they were being treated coldly and professionally, and how it now it was harder to get into the good graces of their bosses to get promotions due to them actively creating boundaries in the workplace. You know, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:35 AM
26

Casual reminder that the foreveralonewomen sub was privated after there was an influx of men WANTING to date them and flodding their dms. The bar is not below hell. It's non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:29 AM
12

They also don't deem hating on unattractive men or social rejects as cruelty, tho. That's why they ARE cruel to them, despite the obvious. Same reason children/teens do the same to their peers. They deem themselves as the just while the undersirables are well... deserving of said treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:26 AM
-7

The degree to which the woman is attracted to the man depends a lot on how attracted he is to her, and how much he shows that. But again, this is simply taking into account ONE part of attraction. Not the whole. You dismiss the entire onus of them being attracted to them in the first place, men actually being physically attractive. Personality, and ergo, how this man is somehow committed to her, comes secondary. men's "most ideal" tends to be the hottest girl he could get, whereas women's ideal …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 04:34 AM
2

A large part of what women find attractive in men is reflective: once a man is above her minimum threshold for attractiveness Men, on the other hand, will continue to be the sight-driven creatures they are, and arguably his attraction to her will be more fickle This contradicts what studies have already shown. Men have more varied preferences and have more range than women when it comes to what they find appealing. You can't say that women's standards are reflective AFTER they already self-selec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 03:14 AM
5

I don't think all women have these expectations broadly. If they did, I wouldn't keep seeing younger couples with a bigger/skinnier/out of shape man in them. For every 1 couple you see with this dynamic, there's like 10 of the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:20 AM
4

Don't threaten them with a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:18 AM
4

Tbf, there are a lot of things that a lot of people do, which are illogical due to statistics yet still do them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:13 AM
6

That said, it does seem like more women gathered food, and more men hunted, but the majority of the caloric intake came from what was gathered than hunted. I mean, considering that the way we supposedly first hunted was just to chase animals around at a reasonable pace for hours until the animal collapses, this doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Everybody running with a handful of trail mix while hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:09 AM
6

I just think past a certain age, all adults are responsible for themselves. Obviously, but the problem starts during the formative years of a man's life. As an example, all adults are responsible for themselves to get out of poverty, but this thought process cannot sweep away all the factors that cause poverty in the first place. Single motherhood, living in poverty, drugs, lack of education etc. All of these are factors that we KNOW that statistically speaking, breed more poverty if the individ…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 02:02 AM
14

hey read traits that women say they like in men and then act shocked that these things do not create sexual attraction. They reeee and seethe that women "lied" to them because him being a thoughtful, creative, and educated man did not make her want to fuck. Well, isn't that obvious? Wanting a man who is attractive will always be implied. TBF the problem is that 2000s society and popular culture has promoted the idea of virtues over physicality. That everybody is "enough" just as they are. So it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:44 AM
21

Considering that's what most people do when they encounter a homeless man, then yeah. It shouldn't be that way but unfortunately, it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:45 AM
2

If women being less kind toward men in general out of the interest of their own safety and peace of mind, provokes those men to act even worse Jesus, the lack of reading comprehension is astounding. You are def just being obtuse on purpose. Look at my argument: Except this has nothing to do with TRP, tho. OP said that there's no reason for women to act nice to men, because this "invites" men to try to pursue a relationship with them that the women don't want, therefore it's in a woman's best int…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 01:19 AM
11

Spoken like a person trying to change the subject. You snuck that in your argument, as a side remark towards men, I took that side remark, and put it face first against your arguments. I didn't change the subject one bit. I literally used it to show how biased you are against men, and how men are not as utilitarian as you believe they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 01:03 AM
0

What I'm reading in that quote is that she's being told by other people, primarily other men, that men can and will misunderstand generic kindness and flirtation, and try to escalate it beyond what it is to the point that it's violating boundaries. Again, better to protect yourself from that than be worried if you're "repelling" normal men. Especially if said "normal" men are going to act pushy and annoying, as told by other men, or in the experience of countless other women. It's like you are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 01:00 AM
2

Guys don't typically get repelled for being normal and not acting strange or harassing people. Unless you define being "repelled" as a woman not giving you more than a baseline of respect and human decency Look at what she said: If I was taught that men see being nice as flirtation and try taking advantage of my kindness, you bet your ass I’d be mean as hell towards men around me. Henceforth, yes, it literally is repelling normal men. Did you read the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 12:50 AM
6

. The fact that people conflate going out of your way for someone as a purely romantic investment is part of the problem, but I don't entirely blame men for this. Again the issue is when the woman keeps wanting for more time investment from the guy. It's fine when it's a one off, but often time the confusion, at least when it comes to male-woman friendships is that women think the man's time is not as important as hers. Because she keeps asking and asking, taking and taking, and for her there's …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 12:07 AM
37

One of those examples of men who cause their own problems and “You can't whine about women choosing the bear when you glorify shitty behavior as male behavior”. But honestly, I think the main problem is too many men don't like people and are only nice to people they can use. Spoken like a true woman, I suppose. Most male to male friendships are egalitarian, they don't actively try to use the other, but do occasionally offer their services if the other friends need it. Because we all know that: A…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 09:53 PM
–

Men behave differently around women they are romantically interested in. If he doesn’t act like an asshole when he’s around her ever how should she just know he is? I'm gonna be completely honest and say that MOST OF THE TIMES the asshole men are GENERALLY assholes in most major daily interactions. Wether that's from lack of manners, to willful ignorance, to mate guarding, to having to always be the most alpha bro in the room. Hence why it's so easy for us men to tell them apart. They CANT HELP …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:30 PM
–

We can say this, but at the end of the day it's a clear pattern. Or at least the source of frustration for young men is noticing the pattern. Did you date an asshole once? It happens. You dated an asshole twice? Sure, it's still possible. You dated an asshole, three, four, five times? That's a pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:24 PM
4

Again, how ironic. You go on here, you explicitly make a post claiming that both sides of the mainstream pills make up generalizations, I guess to get upvotes or something idk, vanity maybe. Somebody tells you exactly what's the problem with this sub, which is that very few people have actually read or understand the red pill "dogma." the majority of these, are the women of this sub, then go on to make up their own version of TRP as a strawman and fight that and criticize that instead. You then …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:51 PM
4

Just because you read a snippet of the books doesn't give you even the smallest amount of authority to then claim that the world it paints is so bleak that everybody that lives like it, is miserable. Read. The. Book. Before you form opinions of the subject. You asked where could you learn what the red pill originally was. I gave you a straight answer. Now you can either go on to read the book if you truly wish to learn what TRP is, or you can continue to make up a strawman of the ideology while …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:38 PM
5

Well... yeah? TRP is at the base of it all more cynical than the standard BP. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:26 PM
3

Read The Rational Male. Should give you a pretty standard baseline of what the red pill was founded on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:14 PM
3

Okay, but maybe AF/BB is also just what people accuse women of doing while they see that they did the same as OP? Considering the majority of times this is applied is when they themselves (the women) admit or more exactly HAVE to specify that the guy they are currently with are NOT as physically attractive/taller/manlier/lust inducing as her other past partners, the answer is no. It's not the same. That is what I said. There's a huge difference between "hoeing around" guy or girl then finding an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 04:42 PM
3

On this sub, most posts from red pill guys can be summarized as “women bad More like: "The majority of problems with the current dating scene stems from women because they hold the majority of control when it comes to dating in general." Women arent bad cuz women bad. Women bad cuz they shit at dating and seeking out stable partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:07 PM
1

Lmao yep. Nowhere in the original comment's wording did he either directly state or imply that the girl he married is less attraxtive than the string of Fwbs or ONSs he had. He didn't settle for anything. He didn't say how this woman was less attractive in his eyes or in the eyes of society "but still loves her more" than the rest of women he at one point had. AF/BB is when people actively seek out people they 100% would not have even given a chance when they were younger, but now do JUST becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:00 PM
–

Hey genius. I'm editing as I find new sources. Literally up to 5 right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:43 PM
–

https://ifstudies.org/blog/number-3-in-2023-theres-no-huge-gender-gap-in-being-single-among-young-adults https://news.iu.edu/live/news/26924-nearly-1-in-3-young-men-in-the-us-report-having-no https://ifstudies.org/blog/1-in-3-a-record-share-of-young-adults-will-never-marry https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-state-of-our-unions/202302/why-are-so-many-young-men-sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:39 PM
–

There's a minority and then there's like 1/3 of young men. Numbers matter. Approximately 1/3 of men havent had any relationships, that is STATISTICALLY significant and it will 100% breed future problems as that generation becomes the main workers in our society. Concern is verh much warranted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 01:37 PM
4

That's the blue pill dichotomy in a nutshell. Hence why the majority of women here don't know what they are talking about. The TRP had the "essentials" reading list on their main description There, in that reading list was The Rational Male, which was practically the TRP bible. Up there it EXPLICITLY STATED that if you were reading this book you were most likely a man who had an ugly, unkempt and chubby at best physical appearance and the first thing you should do while reading the book is to go…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:04 AM
3

By the time they hit adulthood, many women have had a bad experience with a short guy with Napoleon complex, and the general theme of it is "never again." It's not like children and teens are often cruel to their less fortunate peers, amirite? Napoleon complexes don't just magically spontaneously happen. They are constantly reinforced in their childhoods well into their early adulthoods. I don't have a napoleon complex, but i was close to getting one. During most of my middle school and high sch…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:24 AM
0

I was being snarky to the idea that "loser" (as in poverty wise) should be steered away from because poverty itself does horrible consequences to everybody around them. But I guess that's my own fault from inserting my biases. You meant it in a gender less way, not specifically to "loser" men. Right? If that's the case, I apologize. Also, i don't know about you, nor your current living situation but I don't think leaving your children to their father to only take care of to be good either. But t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:35 AM
0

Good thing the single most important factor that determines the likelihood of a child growing up and continuing to be in poverty into their adulthood, more likely to have temperamental issues and is more likely to do crime is single motherhood. I mean, clearly those women are statistically protecting their children from poverty, crime and lack of social decency by steering away from loser men. Imagine being poor together with a stable man. Ew Phew Women really do dodge bullets all the time /s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:21 AM
1

He's using single mothers as an example of his hypothesis. Which is that there is a large percentage of women, that despite having little to no dating success, keep raising their standards, as an example he brought up single women which are the quintessential definition of: "I fucked up badly by choosing an objectively terrible man to have children with. So now I will only look for the best demigod greek of a man, despite him being a myth that will never come." mentality At least by popular sent…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:16 AM
2

It's so funny to me how men simultaneously hate on single mothers while they beg them to lower their standards so they can be picked Tbf I wasn't talking about single mothers, just young women in general. At least in the mid 20s which is my age group, and I don't know what kinda markers you are huffing but single mothers, even young single mothers are not sought-after in droves by men, even men my age that have have their standards lower than the floor that they stand on. Most men steer away fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:58 PM
4

The problem is that the way she raises her standards is by expecting the other men to be fine with her being more selfish not about inproving herself and be able to deduce what the other guy really wants. Yeah. The problem is not why they do it, but rather how they go about it. They raise standards that primarily frustrate the "good" men in an quantifiable way. It's not the: "I want to take it slow. Because I have been hurt in the past." reasoning, it's how they apply it by saying: "We will have…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:14 PM
9

Would you agree that most men and women know this is a violation of boundaries, even if it’s a boundary not explicitly drawn in a relationship? I don't see why not. As a young man barely in his mid 20s I absolutely despise the idea that everything now has to be either labeled or explicitly stated otherwise anything else goes. I hate the concept of "situationships" and "Well yes we went on 6 dates but like we never said we should be exclusive." mentality that people nowaday have. The concept of d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:19 PM
11

That's ice cold ngl. Like sure, it's one way to gain exp fast and easy, but cold nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:25 PM
2

Isn't this just the classic "but was she wearing slutty clothes" argument that we all collectively agreed that it was trash?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:08 PM
4

Most voters are women, by defacto they already have the most political and economic power, that's why they are also the biggest spenders.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:06 PM
-4

Tbf buman rights while yes should be universal, they are, at the end of it all, privileges. If tomorrow Russia invaded and won a war against the U.S. and implemented their own laws, women nor even men wouldn’t magically keep all their rights the had from the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:04 PM
3

Cheating is definitely domestic abuse. Shows a pattern of abuse, not actually abuse tho. cheating became normalized Cheating became normalized back in the stone ages. No clue what you mean by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:16 PM
-1

The fact that men aren’t a hive mind doesn’t take away from the fact that it was people born with penises who came up with the system to oppress women. ??? Nobody came up with a system to oppress women, it unfortunately came NATURALLY because of our evolution both as a species and societal. Just because we are now more advanced to realize that society had to change and women were equal to men,does not make men inherently sexist or wanting a system that shits on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:14 PM
10

They usually won’t kick the woman out of bed, but many immature men will still sleep with women who have these “flaws” and then talk crap about her later. Most men don't even talk about the actual events the sex they have with their friends. These men are rare, especially when you compare how casual it is for women to talk about their sex lives with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:10 PM
–

Uh no??? I'm sorry but this is just insane. It's just is, most attractive men are no different from your average or ugly men when it comes to how they act outside. Some are more charismatic yes, the majority however coast through life with their looks giving them an advantage. I've seen women see a man just WALK into a place and already swoon or quickly make themselves appear available in the hopes he approaches them. Not a single signal, not a single behavior analyzed, not a single "spark" that…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:02 PM
–

And what I’m saying is that women need more than looks to feel active attraction. How so? I've seen women approach and flirt with tall handsome men that they have never seen before nor have seen him act. Doesn't that go against that notion? If women need more than looks to feel active attraction then why does it seem that the ONLY become active participants in the dating game when a tall handsome man is in their vicinity? Also this: This arousing “spark ✨” I’m alluding to is usually a behavioral…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:49 PM
28

Note sure what, here's the study: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 09:13 PM
12

He didn't leave her, tho. She went off and picked a fight she KNEW she wouldn’t win. She then expected to be rescued by her BF. You can tell exactly that most women there have never been in a physical fight, let alone as a man fighting another random man in public. When women confront men in public, even if they use physical force, the same "patriarchy" that they so deeply hate, protects them because even the most subhuman male that lives in western society is taught either by society itself or …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 07:59 PM
5

https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1hf2fx5/_/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 07:42 PM
10

Like the popular post where a girl got the "ick" because her BF did not try to confront/attack a man out in public? That post was seething with misandrists and toxic views.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 07:36 PM
2

"A story that is supposed to be heading on a world ending cataclysmic actions. The stakes have never been higher. The tension has never been higher. This franchise is DARK AF and this trailer was the fucking opposite of all of that." "It was a hero shooter trailer masked as an RPG game. That's why it was recieved so horribly." The comments showed exactly that. But obviously, you do not care about the truth: "Its just whining about the trailer wasnt up to their liking for no reason." Yep, a total…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:49 PM
5

Look at the top comments. All crticizing exactly what I said: Here's a thread made by a sub composed entirely of only women gamers talking about the reveal: Would you look at that same criticisms https://np.reddit.com/r/GirlGamers/comments/1dbznnj/dragon_age_the_veilguard_official_reveal_trailer/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button How about a general gamers thread: https://np.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1dbyrfd/dragon_age_the_veilguard_offic…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:25 PM
11

Where did the devs DA4 was a conclusion. You mean other than the conclusion of every single plot thread that was established in early games? Oh right i'm talking to lillith. Bad faith arguments is her bread and butter. Let's asume that the devs did not intent to actually end the every single plot thread in the series in Veilguard. Let's assume that. The fans, still expected the game to do so. Not only did they expect the game to do so, but they expected the game to become way more dark than it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:07 PM
6

The only thing that irked me about the witcher trailer was Ciri now being able to use witcher signs and potions. Implying she underwent the ritual. The same ritual that Geralt refused to let her go through cuz it was guaranteed to kill women by default, and even men had to undergoe the process as children to even stand a chance of surviving, Ciri was too old when Geralt first met her to go through the process. Yet now it's seemingly fine for an even older Ciri to go through the process? Keep in …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:29 PM
11

(Repost cuz automod cried) Now, they hate diversity and LGBT people with this backlash. They wanted this game to fail as soon as they saw this trailer. What’s wrong with this trailer? It doesn’t have a human white male character. Thats it. Okay now I know that you are talking straight out of your ass. The reason why the trailer was so bad and why the subsequent game was worse was because this game was supposed to be conclusion of a 15 year story. A story that is supposed to be heading on a world…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:24 PM
–

AI relationships will be a disaster. I'm sure some people can lie to themselves and make it feel real but an AI bf/gf doesn't choose you. If it would have been the past me, the same overweight loner guy I was back in college, if I had an AI girlfriend I'd probably end my life soon after. It might feel good at first but eventually you will reach a state of apathy and then depression. I'd look at it like Bladerunner 2049. Sure at first Officer K (Ryan Gosling's character) a replicant, still feels …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:07 PM
–

Ive asked them if they watched those videos because they wish they had a girlfriend, and they all went silent. Yeah probably because connecting both topics is practically insane. I would just shut up and ignore the questions if somebody came to me and proposed a similar line of questions out of left field, I'd probably call you weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:03 PM
3

Except dread game as far as it's commonly understood do not set up ultimatums, at least not at first. It's simply a way for men to set up boundaries to protect themselves and avoid more interpersonal conflict. One of the main things about dread game is to stop actively engaging in arguments with the woman you are with as they will most likely lead nowhere, make you frustrated that your feelings are not being even considered and further conflict will only lead you to be either desperate or suffoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:38 PM
4

It maybe hasn't risen but the gap is still the problem no? Like mathematically speaking, how can both genders have different variations of singleness along the the same age groups of at least 8% if there isn’t a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 06:42 PM
1

Why don’t men do more introspection and take accountability of their lives and fulfillment? Women were spoon-fed all the fairytales of being a wife and motherhood and we’re starting to shed that. Because as a society, we are still beholding men to that ideal... The same reason why now women are starting to shed that... turns out when a society constantly promotes an idea, people follow. Also helps that the indutrial revolution meant that women could do all types of jobs thanks to machines that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 11:48 PM
–

It's not for combating misogyny tho. It's about avoiding men sexually for safety. Which is already a thing? I just don't get it. just "i don't feel safe having sex with men bc i could get pregnant and not get healthcare if it's needed" My heart goes out to those women that do miscarriage and can't get standard medical care because it would be considered abortion, but the idea that now all of a sudden women are hyper aware that they can get pregnant and there are consequences for it is just well.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 11:29 PM
18

Well you see, we don't count. And if we do, it's lesser.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:29 PM
4

I don't disagree that some men do hide their nature out when dating, specially nowadays, but I find it jarring to believe that a majority fo what people call "fuckbois" are anything BUT the most blatantly down bad men that try to shoot their shot with anythjng that slightly moves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 12:31 AM
16

Sigh... Red Piller here I highly doubt the majority of RP men even care that much about women being feminists. Most RP men want their women to have a job, be self-sufficient just like them. Personally, i dont give a fuck, all of my girlfriends were people I disagreed with them on numerous political issues, I just didn’t let that stand in the way of loving and apreciating them. One of the main things I look for in a partner is then having the ability to debate a topic with me, without resolting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 10:44 PM
5

Yeah. Most men either don't care based on principle alone (she's free to do what she wants who cares) or won't feel the impact anyways. Like, sure, women plan to collectively stop having sex with men... to defend reproductive rights... thereby substantialy lowering the chances that the same women get pregnant and most likely are at least positive towards getting an abortion... So Trump and conservatives are literally winning by double whammy. They literally just stopped liberal women from having…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:54 PM
2

Because they are saying in the most literal sense that you can be the best "high quality, attractive man" and still can't get dates because you are not frothing at the mouth and championing Harris lmao. https://youtu.be/rTUjqqZ7WLw This comes off after Obama was shaming black men for not wanting to vote for Harris lmao. https://youtu.be/QVD17hg4O7o
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:48 PM
2

How is it disrespectful and belittling? Beer ads use this same exact narrative all the time. Because the difference is that a beer ad just wants to fucking sell you neer and Harris was trying to shame liberal men into voting for her and subsequently agree with her values. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:43 PM
–

Um no, the first time Trump was elected a big portjon of the country activeky opposed the radical ideas of the left. They did not care that much about Trump's policies. This time Trump's voting base remained the same and the democrats didn’t show up. For as much as dems like to talk and talk, they do a shit job representing where it matters. Well i guess it's not different from wokes online.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 12:50 AM
1

I think you mean dread game? Which is just the strategy of taking a step back and engage in other activities rather than keep giving your partner attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 10:45 PM
8

What's funny is that a large portion of them that aren't explicitly made for a specific degree/field are mostly aimed at gay men. So it's not men, just gay folk.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:25 PM
2

Good. Lost 150 pounds, still retained my leg mass (so don't have to do leg day as much haha) dated a while became a lot more assertive. Now I kinda went into monk mode for a couple of years and just focused on myself/career.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:57 AM
9

Remember how MeToo was under way there was a period where there were countless business-related articles on how for the last year or so, women were finding it really hard to get mentorships and one-on-one meetings with their bosses? How now their bosses were treating women "coldly and very professionaly" instead of the "warm and buddy-buddy" ways these bosses talked to their male subordinates Pepperidge farm remembers... https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMms1805743 https://www.nytimes.com…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:57 AM
3

Last straw when I was still in my first year in college after trying to date and failing miserably as a fat "shy" guy, was when I asked a couple of women I was friends with what could I do. "Just be yourself." Instead of gaining the artificial confidence that had always appeared after I heard that statement, I remember saying to myself: "Why would I be myself if I suck? Why would anybody want me if I'm ugly fat and lack confidence?" A week later, I was reading The rational male and starting to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:53 AM
3

"Be not afraid!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:49 AM
6

Men have a far larger preference net. Even here. In fact even when a post is talking about fat women, there's literally always a top comment saying something like "I dig fat women" or "I love fat women."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:44 AM
4

Uh yeah? Creeped out as well. My cousin's kid is this handsome dude who looks way older than he is. He looks like 18-19, but he's 15, he's always been treated better compared to my childhood so I try to hang out with him from time to time to see what's like on the other side of the fence. A year ago, he wanted to buy some ice cream, so I drove him to the local supermarket and told him to get the ice cream while I was looking for some sour candy. He comes back on the verge of crying because a cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:36 AM
13

Mental health isn't perceived as real. Young men struggling with mental health are viewed as extra-contemptible because a) rigid masculinity; b) the horrors of the past century didn't happen to you; what do you have to complain about? I fail to see the difference with North American men. Mental health may be "socially acceptable," but it's still heavily stigmatized, especially in dating when it comes to men. My psych told me that it was a normal occurrence that many women lose interest when men …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 09:52 PM
1

Big examples: Ooh gonna be fun dissecting this. (1. Mindy Kahling) You mean the woman that constantly harps against specifically "white men" in every single rant she does online. The same woman that helped create Velma, a show where they remove everything beloved and wholesome about scooby-doo only to lazily race swap characters, make Daphne a lesbian that is into Mandy Kaling's self insert Velma? The same woman that DECIDED to have children by invitro and CHOSE a white male's sperm for her chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:35 PM
7

like y’all really dont think these men have more motivation to deny this to the ends of the earth even if it was true? Of course, SA is still a crime. Which means jail. I'd assume that every person would deny murder allegations as well. who has more incentive to lie? who has more to lose if they dont lie Considering the massive support and immediate rallying of the wagons in defense of the accuser...? No clue. Both equally have reasons to lie. I've said this before, my immediate reaction to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 09:50 PM
42

Thatsthejoke.jpeg
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:49 PM
1

You do understand that one of the fundamental drives most men had at some point in their lives it the white-picket fence middle class American dream? If normal men become jaded by society for any magnitude of reasons that you consider valid or not, this will still create problems along the road. Because society is built upon with the notion that these men will continue moving the cog around, but if they renounce it, or simply do the bare minimum in order to afford an apartment and a gaming conso…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:43 PM
1

You seem fo be confused, past education was more liberal before it was mass adopted into the current sedentary education that we have today what you claim is "old" education, is barely 80 to 100 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 09:43 AM
2

They also didn’t have the technological advantage of the internet and social media. You do understand that part of the reason why the first wave of feminism was so successful was because independent "cells" were naturally created all over the Western world, right? You do understand that the first wave mostly just went against primarily local politics related to their immediate community and it then grew from there? It means that it was easier to pressure these local government officials because …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 04:30 AM
10

Lmao, feminism started from a book released in 1790-ish. The first wave of feminism did not do shit until the late 19th century. Even if we were to compare the age head to head men still have around 80 years to first start doing something.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:31 PM
2

You are right. We should make all fem-coded subs like TwoX ban rape/SA posts I mean, we don't have to hear it all the time right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:28 PM
2

I don’t know what world you’re living in, but boys were held to lower standards than girls when I was in school, and I’m gen z. They would be praised for not disrupting class and sitting still. You do understand that exactly the problem with current education philosophy? Natural boy behavior is discouraged in order to make them as passive as possible in order to lazily educate them in order for them to memorize and vomit information in the same exact way. Part of the reason why boys struggle mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 08:25 PM
2

Not sex related, but I had my second gf "talk" to her friend how I wasn't as tall as her exes. I'm 5'9. She was 5'3. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:30 PM
4

Boys have been systematically discriminated against since early childhood by schools, teachers, parents, etc. Women are constantly positively praised in media/culture, schools, etc. I'm sure that your childhood sucked. Mine also did. But we are not talking about the exceptions of the rule. We are talking about how a society reinforces the belief that girls and women are automatically considered valuable by virtue of existing. Men and boys are not. We have to provide some kind of practical value …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:14 PM
16

B-but women have it hard toooo!" Average women can go on a dating app and have 1000 matches within 72 hours. What's funny is that unlike men, women's dating advice hasn't needed to adapt to the current dating market. If anything, the lessons parents, specifically fathers, teach their daughters is even more true these days. "Men will like you because of your beauty. Find someone who likes you more than that. Don't fall for their tricks." And yet modern young women either ignore or utterly fail at…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:20 PM
2

Was this after or before he wrote the book? I kind of remember how he said in the book that PUA only gets you inside the door and is not helpful to maintaining relationships. It would be funny if he wrote this and literally fell into the same pitfalls after in his marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 03:06 AM
0

Why do you bring it up then? Because I was explaining why some average men stay or commit so much of their time with flaky girls. Which is par for the course in a debate sub. It's literally the third time I said this twice directly to you. WHAT? That's the shittiest explanation ever. Only an absolute desperate LOSER with no self-esteem would be clinging to a flaky girl. I refuse to believe that the trash you've described is an average man. Because we are not talking about just the average man, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:53 AM
0

Ahahahaha, are you one of those people that watches this "equality" bullshit on the media and actually believes that men would benefit from it in any way? What's the outcome you were expecting for men on dating apps? Please point to where I said that men should be getting 100s of matches. And this is the MEN'S problem that THEY need to address: Expectation of instant gratification. That's just not going to happen, if you're not in top 20%, and 80% of men are not 🤷🏽‍♂️ If you aren't hot as fuck, …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:29 AM
2

Not just that, but the people who are arguing against this forget a very important thing. Unlike women, average men don't have a 100-person line of potential partners at a moment's notice. The men that are "wasting their time" with the flaky girl, most likely DON'T have any other potential girl that they can immediately switch their attention and be reciprocated instantly. So, of course, these men will try their hardest to make it work with the flaky girl. It's the best option for the few option…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 01:03 AM
3

From my experience hanging out with mostly overweight/mid girls in college as a clique for an entire college year, mid women are substantially pickier than other women. The hottest girl of the group had a string of boyfriends with different looks/personalities/handsomeness, while the majority of the mid/overweight women were constantly obsessing with their man having a very specific look and personality and any man who was below that standard was immediately disqualified and mocked relentlessly …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:53 AM
–

No, I did not. I just pointed out the irony and then clarified by question for you. I'm not saying Trump's ideas are better. But to say that men should overwhelming vote Democrat because they will "help" this issue is frankly not true, because the programs and ideas they promote already discriminates against boys and created the school gender-bias in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:06 PM
–

You are so far affected by the Trump Derangement Syndrome that you think me criticizing your stance on this issue is the same as me supporting Trump. The fucking irony of an educated woman being this close-minded while having the reading comprehension of a 5 year old child. No wonder women succeed with the current sedentary education, when all you have to do is memorize information and vomit it in the same way, women will always beat men at it and that includes political insults. I'm gonna say i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 07:01 PM
–

I’m saying if it’s such a big problem it would affect how men vote. You did not say that. You said this: So men should vote for democrats and support better public education for all. Right? "Hey guys if you really care about this issue, you should vote for the political group that further wants to implement the same policies that disproportionately affects your gender!"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:51 PM
–

Get more involved in education and create a curriculum that boys would do better in. You do understand that this gender bias in school is a relatively new thing right? Before we massively promoted sedentary education, men did far bigger in education. How are men now supposed to change curriculums that better help boys, when they are disproportionately discriminated against even in the top levels of Academia? "Just change the national/global/first world concensus on sedentary education bro, easy.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:47 PM
–

God, I love having the "privilege" of struggling harder by the basis of my gender. Men ftw!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:30 PM
–

Lmao. I'm not arguing in favor of Trump or Republicans either. But I am asking you, why should men vote Democrat solely on democrats pushing for more public education programs when it's those same programs that disproportionately discriminates against boys and men? Like your entire comment very clearly promotes that this problem would be fixed with people voting for democrats, when if anything, further expanding such programs would make the problem worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:24 PM
–

Considering that public education is the one that most promotes the gender bias in schools and disproportionately discriminates against boys, why should one vote democrat when they want to further push that discrimination? Like, legit question.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:15 PM
–

UNESCO offers this rationale for why boys' education is important: Globally, improving educational opportunities for girls continues to be of paramount importance [...] Better-educated men are more likely to help in the household and take on care responsibilities [...] boys who have a secondary education are more likely to condemn gender-based violence Lmao. Classic example of "Men are struggling, Women most affected." Even when addressing the benefits of having Men get better education, not eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:13 PM
10

Lmao. Got a friend that is 6'4, chiseled face, almost never talks, used to hang out with us "school shooter" types of guys, and still slayed pussy left and right. Being an attractive person means that everything you do is going to be ALWAYS perceived as better than an ugly person. An ugly person is creepy, an attractive person is eccentric. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 06:01 PM
11

Because the majority of feminists do not agree with you, which in turn makes you, a misogynist in their views. Because you are restricting and dictating what women should do with their bodies. Oof.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:19 PM
24

All the porn subs exist Ah. You must be one of those traditional feminists that thinks porn as a whole is misogynistic. Unfortunately for you, the majority of feminists currently do not think that way, hence why they defend women who post in these kinds of sub, which is why these subs are alive and thriving. Mens rights etc Men's rights is not a popular sub. If it got to that point it gets nuked from orbit. Case in point. /r/foreveralone /r/incel subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:14 PM
34

Reddit is overwhelmingly male and overwhelmingly misogynist. TwoX is a default sub. Admins have systematically banned every misogynistic or adjacent popular subs that employ similar political world views. Incel-adjacent subs were carpet bombed and nuked from orbit. You can't go one day without a /r/Comic /r/Popular /r/Pics /r/offmychest post talking about the struggles of women in some way, shape, or form. REddIT IS OvERWHeLMINglY mALe and oVerWHeLMiNgly miSOgYNiST. God, I wish I was this delusi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:08 PM
5

Considering that the majority of the sub is women, a book club would be more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 02:04 PM
4

I did a DNA test on both my daughter, myself, and her mom, plus my grandmother, and both of my parents for the purpose of determining ancestry. Nobody threw a fit Tbf, there's a difference between "Hey, let's check out where our ancestors come from!" and "Hey, I think you cheated. I want a paternity test."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:42 AM
2

There’s no law saying you HAVE to sign the birth certificate right away or that paternity is assumed if you’re not married. There are places where it is possible for the woman to put a man's name on the birth cert even if he doesn't want to. He would need to actively deny it by submitting an appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:25 AM
18

It's fallen out of fashion because it is inherently better to make up arbitrary oppression stats based on your appearance and identity in the hopes this somehow gets you further ahead and recognized in society. Of course, as long as you aren't cis-gendered or hetero, but if you are, make sure you don't end up as a man, and if you do end up as a man, be sure you are not white, and if you are a white man, make sure you are a submissive and socially conscious individual that is an ally to the cause…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 09:39 PM
-6

They need to own up to the type of men they date and stay with after being abused. It’s not anyone else’s fault that they date abusive men other than her and the man. You responded to this with this: Your world view of men is very black and white. Men are either "good" or "bad", nothing in between and no nuance. A "good man" would never commit domestic violence. That's not reality. The point that you did not understand is that the commenter you responded said context-wise that men that are "good…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 01:01 AM
-3

I don't think I've ever had an attractive guy argue with me about my own thoughts lol Because often than not attractive men are already one foot in the door, so they don't feel the need to argue with a woman in order to get attraction. It's like hanging around rich families and noticing they don't worry about money. Well, of course they don't worry about money, they are loaded to begin with. Not only that, but even in actual red pill ideology, they explicitly tell the men to not argue with women…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 12:47 AM
1

Men are either "good" or "bad", nothing in between and no nuance. A "good man" would never commit domestic violence. That's not reality. Ask anyone who works in that field. Any man or woman who physically assaults their partner is bad regardless of the circumstances unless the individual committing the violence is not in their right mind (psychosis, paranoia, etc) or they themselves are experiencing physical violence by their partners and are only responding that way for self-defence. Yes. The w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 12:42 AM
–

Ah, another IT comrade. Yeah, I get my fair share of those guys in my company. Typically, I just selectively remove those images from my head unless it's something ilegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 12:29 AM
–

I'm more surprised that they were bold enough to tell you that they get off on watching women pee lmao. That's the kind of kink that I would take to the grave and beyond. Not even God, if he exists, would make me admit to such a kink. Some men are wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 12:10 AM
2

Autists might not be able to mask, but ask any guy on the planet about post nut clarity, and a huge percentage of them will tell you a story about how they were really feeling a girl until they got off, and then they weren’t anymore. You’re saying every guy who’s ever experienced PNC is some asshole fuckboi? You’re telling me ALL those guys aren’t good at “masking”? Bullshit. Huh? HUH? Are you seriously equating post nut clarity, which is only a behavior that men do until they sleep with the wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 11:37 PM
-2

Failing to realize that most women have absolutely had their hearts broken by the nerdy guy. Just because the guy you like just happens to be chiseled like Henry Cavill, tehee™ but sometimes wears glasses and plays video games does not make him nerdy /s You seem to have this idea that the only guys women go for are the bad boys No, but generally, men don't mask as well as women. What does that mean? It means that the guy that cheated on you or the guy that stood you up multiple times tend to exh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 10:35 PM
1

The data on women in actual relationships completely dismantles this narrative. And in fact, women are far far more realistic in general than single men when it comes to actually getting into committed relationships First of all, what data are you talking about. Second, women are gatekeepers of sex, which is, nowadays, what happens before you get into a committed relationship. So yeah, if a study shows that women get into more relationships than men, it doesn't disprove anything when they contro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:49 AM
0

imagine not knowing that societal ideas about beauty have always been in flux There's a difference between going from skinny blonde girls like in the 60s to 80s to the now "racially ambiguous" big booty women which happened somewhat naturally with passive media perception and an ACTIVE push to change beauty standards, not necessarily because the new one is better, which objectively it isn't, but because the non-attractive people (which I consider myself a part of) want everybody else to conform …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 11:41 PM
1

And yet, it is largely women that create and promote movements that inherently want to change societal ideas of beauty. It's not that they believe that they are hotter. It's that they want the world to gaslight itself into thinking that these women are hotter than they are. That's why movements like the fat acceptance movement exist. Hence why even though movements like that one claim to be for all genders, it almost exclusively promotes the idea of changing only one gender's perception of beaut…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 11:34 PM
0

Because women's self esteem are largely based on physical appearance, hence why they focus so much on it, hence why there are movements that promote the idea that all women are beautiful regardless of the truth. Men aren't nearly as affected because inherently, we don't tie our self-worth to just our physical appearance, hence why our self-esteem is slightly better than women overall. It's literally the meme of the fat guy looking at himself at the mirror and seeing a buff guy and a skinny woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 11:22 PM
5

So when men shoot above their league it's "shoot your shot, maybe you get lucky". But when women shoot above their league, it's "don't do it, you will never find a suitable date, but only men who just want sex and don't commit to. you really should give the men in your league, which i define who they are, a chance!" I mean, the difference is quite obvious, tho. It has nothing to do with a gender difference but rather outlook difference. Very few men, if at all, constantly shoot far above their l…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:20 PM
-1

dead rotting fetus inside them, and they're like, nah, you have to wait to go septic before we can help. I know multiple pro-life people. The majority of them don't believe that a woman should be forced to wait until they go septic in order to get an abortion. They believe that if the woman's life is threatened by the child, they should have the option to terminate. I find the "omg dead fetus can't aburt wuzzz' argument to be a huge strawman because very few people, even on the pro-life side, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:04 PM
8

The path to hell is paved with good intentions. Regardless of what she intended to happen, she blurted out that the guy is not attractive enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:47 AM
-3

THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE SKINNY GIRL- FAT BOY COUPLES YOU HAVE THE GUY LOOKING LIKE SHAQUILLE ONEAL AROUND HIS GIRL
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:38 PM
-1

Except there is a difference between a guy that is around your height and looks like a ball of lard and a guy that is 3-5 inches taller than the average man who looks like a bear. BMI points to both of them being obese or fat, but their looks ratings are astronomically different. You omitting that when you point out those couples in disingenuous because nobody that argues that these pairings are uncommon thinks of such a man, but thinks of the round fat lard that's the same exact height or maybe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:33 PM
2

usually fat man - skinny woman, but those aren't super common, either. You must be in your 30s because my perspective in college and mid-20s has been the opposite. Usually, that specific pairing comes from the guy also generally being a good 3-5 inches taller than the woman less fat and more Husky type of body form. It's like pointing out Shaq with his girlfriend and being like, "He's fat, and she's skinny.," Sure, if you ignore the caveat of the guy towering above every other man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:20 PM
4

are you sure you don't just have awful friends. i dont think femininity is synonymous with having a decent friendgroup. By design, men are less group focused. Women are more group focused. And no, there's a reason we don't reach out for help and would rather take a bullet to the head. so what you're saying isn't even arguing with my point. so it's not inferior,it's... superior? I'm saying it's harder, but depending on how well you do, it either becomes a much better life than a woman's, or you e…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:12 AM
3

a feminine woman lacks agency and relies on her dominant counterpart. she can never prioritize herself or love herself more than the person she serves. in comparison, shouldering responsibility (your OWN responsibility) seems like a good bargain. imo not being able to get a partner is not enough to make masculinity inferior. It's not like men being more feminine will result in being able to get a partner more. That's exactly my point. You don't understand what it is like being a man, so of cours…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:27 AM
–

This is the key. Not gender. On average, women by far are much more vulnerable in context to physical safety. In theory, yes. But because society itself had instilled men to never harm women, it also makes it so they are less likely overall to get hurt by random acts of violence than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:13 AM
4

I'm just gonna ask a simple question. Why do you think masculinity is better? Because from where I'm standing, masculinity itself is a lonely endeavor. Being masculine means that you always shoulder everything and bottle it up. You barely get to release it. A stoic mindset. It's not the fun mindset that current women think it is, because at the end of the day, women may act more masculine, but still want the men to take care of them and be even MORE masculine than their other dates and herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:11 AM
5

But even then, you still need combat roles. Hell, even in WW2, we still needed infantry despite not having the war on our doorstep. If the objective of a war is to get the other to surrender without completely wiping them off the face of the Earth, then we will always need ground troops.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:41 PM
6

Don't women have less required barriers of entry? Not trying to diss or assume anything seeing as even as a man, I wouldn't dare to willingly go through boot camp myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:40 PM
3

First of all, I took a paragraph right out of the book. Literally, Jane said all of that, not me. So I have no idea why you are getting so worked up about it. The point of the story is that she saw him through his physical "flaws." I just find it funny that she blatantly told us that if he had been conventionally handsome that she would have had no problem doing whatever he wanted. As for Katniss, you neglected to take the context to its full completion. Gale was an angry dick and her emotional …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:14 AM
3

Funny thing about Rochester. Jane says that if he had been handsome she wouldn't have questioned him at all and followed his demands: He had a dark face, with stern features and a heavy brow; his eyes and gathered eyebrows looked ireful and thwarted just now; he was past youth, but had not reached middle-age; perhaps he might be thirty-five. ... Had he been a handsome, heroic-looking young gentleman, I should not have dared to stand thus questioning him against his will, and offering my services…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 09:46 PM
12

The problem comes that even when you present facts or nuance into blue pillers and women, then they immediately dismiss such facts. For instance, yes, women are not a monolith. We can all pretty much agree on this, but when you bring up that women have certain tendencies or have some pretty general preferences, women make it their absolute mission to find the exception of the rule , just to disprove said rule and shut down conversation. An example: Redpill's AWALT (All Women Are Like That). It i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:38 PM
1

That has nothing to do with what I said nor what OP is talking about. Nor do I or most others have an issue with women being sexually open with only their husbands. You must like creating strawmen in order to fight them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:11 AM
1

You must have the reading comprehension of a child. I didn't say that women are hoes to only their husband's. What I said was that women only become open to advances when they see an incredibly hot guy. If no hot guy is present and only regular men are available, she becomes unapproachable. The reason why people say "women are easier" now is because if you are already a hot guy, you have to pass through less hoops and pitfalls than a man dating in the 2000s because women are more shallower now (…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 11:37 PM
11

They don't need to be virtious, evidejced by the statistics of single mothers. To suggest that women are going out and looking at a hot guy and wishing they were their future baby mama is frankly stupid. If it did apply then it would apply to the kind of women that target celebrities/athletes that blatantly act in that way. We can say that women initially do look for men who appear to be virtuous yet completely shit the bed in identifying said men. Both things can be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:18 PM
21

It is harder in terms of socializing and in terms of finding a truly virtuous and handsome man, which is why they constantly complain about it. That's their struggle, and it's gotten harder. It doesn't mean that just because it is harder for women nowadays (relative to women in the 2000s), it doesn't mean that it is relative to men's struggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:34 PM
–

And that there is mostly an age imbalance in the sub. Women here tend to me much older than the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:23 PM
18

My personal experience is that only some emotions are truly acceptable. Those relating to struggles with my mental health are truly off the table as even uttering the word ADHD gives most of them recoil.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:17 PM
96

The assertion boils down for this: "All women are unavailable until the right man enters the room." Point blank it just means that while women aren't necessarily sex motivated, they are rather partner motivated. The moment they see the right man, they move mountains for them to appear available to their desired man. So sure, it is harder nowadays for men and women because of lack of socialization, but inversely, it is easier than ever for men who already have one step inside the door to get laid…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:11 PM
4

You must have only read the title and went with it didn't you? He forgot to put the word "don't" since his explanations directly contradict his title: But these experiences women experience don't match up what I see my guy friends or myself doing irl. Most men I know have very little options and every time one of my guy friends gets into a relationship, which happens rarely, they're very serious about, they start hanging out with us less and start devoting more time with the person they're datin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:02 PM
-3

Nope. Most men in real life actually do understand that statement. Again. Men do understand what the statement means. But HOW it is said is also important. I thought women were all about subtlety Jesus. I just think it's a wrong interpretation and its insecurity talking whether you wanna accept that or not. That's projection. A person doesn't need to say "I don't need others" to prove to others that they are independent. They just do it. Insecurity comes from the person that feels the need to pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:38 AM
0

Your whole explanation comes from the feminine perspective, yet you are arguing how the male perceives it. The whole point is that women whom immediately say "I don't need no man" come off as stand-offish and high on their own farts. They automatically display an aggressive or defensive stance against any potential man that comes near them. So when a man hears those words they immediately recoil and either cut their losses or proceed with extreme caution. It's like living in a house with a fence…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:18 AM
2

No thats almost saying the opposite. The women who say they dont need a man arent actively looking for a man but if one comes along and meets her standards thats great too. That's literally what she said. lmao: I disagree because I think it means more of a, “ I don’t need no man, so prove to me why I should even consider you.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:55 AM
2

5'9. Was around 300 when I entered college. Now I'm at 160. Pounds, not sure how much kilos is that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:59 AM
3

Maybe she was overweight too, or not your type, so you didn't notice. I did notice. She, unfortunately for me, met a good guy and they have been on a steady relationship for 5 years. She's a kind soul, If there's one person in this world that I could wish eternal happiness it's her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:56 AM
5

It's more than that. It that it feels so fake. Like I had women that had known me in the past and had treated me awful when I was overweight come up now and be all friendly with me. Now I'm not the socially awkward loner, I'm the "brooding mysterious type." Like, no, woman, the only thing I have changed is my physical appearance, I'm still the same loner you knew but now instead of finding me boring you find me interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:52 AM
1

Online I'm more vicious than in real life. Tend to treat people with respect regardless. The women that I dated ranged from chubby to amateur model. I never particularly cared that much about looks, the problem is that I have internalized how ugly I was that I can never escape it. Basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:49 AM
5

I'm abstaining from relationships and sex. Why? Because after embracing redpill and seeing how people, especially women, treat me now that I'm not longer overweight, broke me inside and made me more misogynistic in a sense and I do not wish to hurt another person because of my unresolved personal issues. Most of the red pill strategies worked after I got fit. Dread game? Easy. I basically applied it naturally, seeing as I'm already the "quiet brood type." Spinning? Not really my thing, but I had…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:56 AM
0

cour·age noun the ability to do something that frightens one. "she called on all her courage to face the ordeal" strength in the face of pain or grief. "he fought his illness with great courage" Not sure where you get the danger part from. It is courageous for men because they have to risk social humiliation and/or rejection by putting themselves out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:54 PM
14

The "sprinkle sprinkle" women. (Yes it's as stupid as it sounds)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:11 PM
0

Decent and being walked all over are two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:09 PM
1

I think music was the one that killed God. Society was already well on their way to behave like right now without even before the hyperboost it got from the dot.con era
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:07 PM
9

Lmao. Check the wiki: The 2011 UK undercover policing relationships scandal, in which police officers obtained sex by deceiving as to their identity, as part of their duties. Crown Prosecutors declined to prosecute on the basis that legally, the actions would not constitute rape as consent to the act itself was informed and the grounds for rape by deceit as to identity was extremely limited. This goes against your argument btw. In September 2019, serial rapist Jason Lawrance appealed against one…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 08:26 AM
12

This is legally called rape by deception. If a person has lied in order to get someone to sleep with them, and the lie is a deal-breaker then legally it's considered a form of coercion. Only applies in the doctor case if the offender used his influence professionally. The best example is a case in California were a guy lied about being a doctor, and told the woman that she had a deadly desease that could only be cured by sex, and that he would send an anonymous donor to help her. He then showed …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 07:43 AM
1

hm
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:28 PM
2

So really, the no make-up rule works mostly if you have these beautiful features naturally. In my experience, 80-90% of women do not. So instead of playing the same game as the men, they use make up to delude themselves into thinking that they are better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 02:47 PM
8

Bro. You posted multiple women without makeup and they chose to nitpick the literal last example and applied it to all examples lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 01:04 PM
–

Bait used to be believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:13 AM
7

Maybe. But they don't go around telling the women they date that they bought all of it for them and then refuse to pick up the tab. Lmfao. Incredible mental gymnastics. Olympic gold medalist levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:48 PM
9

What you count as spending money on dating is ambiguous. Is your gym membership money spent on dating? Your nice clothes budget? Men may think it is. takes a breath HAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHAH How are you throwing this back at the men? It's fucking women that justify not paying for shit because of all the extensive makeup/hair treatments they use on themselves to "look" pretty. Since when are the men using the "I pay for my gym to look good for you" as an actual excuse to not pay? Fuck me the amount of g…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:45 PM
3

So basically for every 2 men that pay, a woman pays.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:38 PM
14

I mean wanna see how easily we can flip this? Feminists and covert-narcissism Is passive-aggressive ( posting hurtful things about men on social media to get a reaction out of them) Criticizes and judges from the sidelines (huge criticism of cis-gendered men constantly) Is condescending and superior (all the time on social media) Denies and dismisses others’ feelings (watch how they talk about male suicide and misandry) Identifies as a victim (look at all the woe is me posts about their abusive …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 09:04 PM
–

For every ogre like your brother that has found success, there are hundreds, maybe thousands of them that don't find success. People here talk about trends and rules, not the exceptions of the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:56 AM
–

Tbf most people even on here aren't just complaining about women dating whomever they want but rather the leaps that women take to lie, mislead, ommit and in some situations gaslight men into thinking that their choices aren't purely based on raw attraction and they also criticize the AF/BB strategy that women employ when it is convenient to them. You don't see men justifying themselves onto others socially why they chose to date that crazy hot chick that blew up their world (both literally and …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:45 AM
2

Yeah, that's the point. We haven't had a war that has threatened the U.S.'s very existence since WW2. Hence why a draft is currently not needed. But to say that there isn't ever a reason to bring it back in times of war is ludicrous and extremely naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:53 PM
3

It's about way more than not wanting them to join nato. it was primarily because they were in the process of joining Nato that Russia started fucking around their borders because there's a clause that says that you can only join Nato if you don't have territorial disputes/wars alongside your border. I never said they weren't. I was very specific in countries simply don't need a draft. If korea needs men on the frontline, they can make it a worthwhile career choice You don't seem to understand wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:21 PM
–

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:28 AM
–

Yeah, but the conclusion here is that it's okay to lie as long as it's not intentional which ironically is how the nice guy first acts around women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:33 AM
–

I didn't say intent. But rather that as a consequence that it happens. Obviously, people can tell when women wear makeup. What I'm saying is that subconsciously, women do use makeup to lie even if the conscious thought of "I want to lie" never crosses their minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:26 AM
–

But doesn't the mere fact that she wants to look nice inherently mean that she wants to lie to others, including herself?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:19 AM
–

It's mostly because when women wear makeup, they don't do it specifically to get men. But rather, they do it to appear as "pretty on the outside as they do on the inside." So when they see men acting nice just to get into their pants, they see it as creepy and manipulative. Yet at the same time, they can't see how lying to the world and to themselves that they are more attractive than they actually arr is also problematic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:18 AM
7

since women have a bio clock and the dating norms/divorce laws are not symmetric. objectives are probably the same Divorce laws have been tipped in favor of women since the 1980s. Dating norms have absolutely tipped in favor of women. Because they, unlike men who still have to hold their traditional gender roles of being a protective/provider/attractive, have promoted the erasure of their own gender roles. The bio clock is probably the only thing that is harder on women, but compared to the infl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:10 AM
17

I can empathize with the struggles women have, always did. It's just that women outright refuse to even fathom that in these modern times, they might be the ones in a position of power and therefore privileged. I don’t actually think (hetero) women live on easy mode, I think they’re playing a different game altogether. If the rules and objectives are the same for them as they are to men, (get married, maybe have children, settle down etc) then the game is absolutely the same and therefore "easy …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 02:14 AM
–

It's a really old joke: A backpacker is traveling through Ireland when it starts to rain. He decides to wait out the storm in a nearby pub. The only other person at the bar is an older man staring at his drink. After a few moments of silence the man turns to the backpacker and says in a thick Irish accent: "You see this bar? I built this bar with my own bare hands. I cut down every tree and made the lumber myself. I toiled away through the wind and cold, but do they call me McGreggor the bar bui…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 02:04 AM
1

If population growth was the only factor in determining a race's success then China and the Mongols would have surpassed Europe by centuries. It was the relatively STABLE political systems Europe had compared to other countries in history that allowed Europe to propell itself forward in terms of overall advancement. Every time a new Chinese dynasty farted in the wind, millions died in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 01:59 AM
–

hm?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 02:04 AM
13

These differences got smaller with age, with older females showing more widely distributed connections throughout the brain rather than just in the frontal lobe. Currently, scientists can't quantify how much an individual has male- or female-like patterns of brain connectivity. Another lingering question is whether the structural differences result in differences in brain function, or whether differences in function result in structural changes. So assuming it is the same study that she is refer…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 09:08 PM
14

The point is that those men that THEY chose are higher smv than them. Them complaining about it and talking about doesn't disprove or negate the fact that they DID delude themselves into thinking their SMV was the same as their RMV otherwise why are they even bringing it up to the world? If these women were just hooking up for the sake of hooking up, they wouldn't NEED to bring up the issue of the men not committing but because they want a guy to commit or at least treat them better than a side …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:23 AM
17

We are told our whole lives that some men will fuck us but never ever date us. This idea is ubiquitous on social media and in popular culture. Yet when a woman takes a bite of the forbidden fruit... The point is that they delude themselves further. They believe that they are the ONE. When women see a rule, they think they are the exception. If people all walk, she is the one who runs (in her head, of course). Most often I've seen overweight/obese women talk about men deeming them for sex only. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 03:40 AM
–

So if once is fine, why not just strive for that. You surely don't go into a relationship, have sex once and then ask if thatwas the best of her llife and if not, break up. Because not only did she withhold this info for 5 years to him. She told her friends about it. He feels publicly humiliated. Can't really come back from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:30 PM
–

Do you have sex? Because you would know that you cannot reach the apex of satisfaction every time, even if you are her best sex partner. Having the best sex with the best parter is rare, even if you know each other inside out The classic BP offensive move. "Are you an incel?" Yes I've had sex. No I did not say that you had to reach the apex EVERYTIME. It could be ONCE and it would still be fine. Is it really SO important to you that the one instance of having the best sex of her life was with yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:14 PM
–

Because part of the enjoyment that men get when they have sex is that they are doing everything possible to make sure their partners are reaching their sexual apex of satisfaction. To know that you can't ever get that high, but someone else did, yet she feels content with you is extremely demoralizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:02 PM
–

Did you even read the post? Because it looks like he did. Multiple times. It's just that both her GF and her friend denied it until one of them slipped up. Now, I am also friends with Kiley (26F) . We have been friends for a very long time, pretty much since we were babies, and we’re almost like siblings at this point, because her mother and my mother were best friends since they were in high school. Anyways, Kiley is part of the same tight knit friend group as Amy. I always try to ask Kiley wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:47 PM
–

Because both OP and his GF have a fundamental disagreement that is relationship ending. OP thinks sex is important to a relationship. His GF doesn't. This is why she's "settling" for OP because he's the "perfect package" (for anything that's not related to sex). So it's not a matter of his GF, not just thinking that OP is not the best in bed. It's just that she doesn't particularly CARE about sex in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:44 PM
–

Of course not, but that doesn't justify acting like a child because you heard something you don't like and are so insecure you can't handle that your fiancee loves you for more than just sex. You know. I find it hilarious when blue pillers try to bend over their arguments. Whether you like it or not. Both the OP and his GF have a FUNDAMENTAL disagreement: The importance of good sex The woman in no uncertain terms flat out said to her friend that she could live with not so great sex because OP wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:31 PM
–

If you can't get confident about your sexual performance or how your partner sees you, marry a virgin and then wonder if she ever read an erotic novel and compares her fantasy to how you perform in bed. Your fear will always find a way to feel bad about your sexual performance. I think you are conflating fear with knowledge of the truth. Here, it is confirmed that she does think his sexual performance in bed is lacking, but it's "just good enough" because "she doesn't care about sex that much." …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:23 PM
–

Gee, perhaps this would happen less frequently if red-pill men didn't constantly harangue and berate women into disclosing all details of their sexual past. You are right. Employers shouldn't ask for past references nor resumes, and police shouldn't take note of people's criminal history. Nor banks should take a person's credit history. Nor we shouldn't take note of a person's past history of addiction. Nor doctors take note of a patient's medical history. I mean, after all, it is in the past. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:14 PM
8

The men on this sub just seem to prefer casual sex over relationships and base their value as a man in acquiring it. I don’t think it’s a popular opinion tbh. It's the why. You have to ask why. Men here who prefer casual relationships over meaningful ones is likely because they either see the amount of work, trust, and risks taken that are needed to have a meaningful relationship and have decided it's not worth it. Maybe they have been burned in the past. Maybe they feel that the rat race is not…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 04:19 PM
23

MGTOW/Men's rights are movements that aren't concerned with dating. Like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 03:56 AM
6

Okay. I'm gonna go the extra mile and give you another analogy so you can better understand the original one. Please read very carefully: Imagine you have two persons. One of these doesn't have any enough money to afford even a sandwich, and he is unhappy about it. The other person has so much money, they can afford to go to a buffet and eat as much as they like and what they like, so they always pick the most delicious meals available. Yet they are unhappy because they are gaining weight. Both …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 03:04 PM
4

Brooo. I wish I could go through life having a brain that struggles to understand such an analogy. My life would be so much better. https://youtu.be/sdLw8tSUT_Q?si=Ikpsmw405MMI-QF4&t=15
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 02:39 PM
7

Idk. Maybe because I'm a guy but the men that string women along tend to be very obvious that they are doing so. Specially when they have a history of doing so with other women. Usually, the reason women stay is because they THINK they are the ONE to fix his ways and will make him fall in love with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 02:32 PM
2

Yeah... the whole game subsection had me in stitches because I know all of those games BECAUSE a friend of mine who is a woman has told me about them. Disco Elysium is the only exception to the games she has mentioned. Like sure, he said girl games as a derogatory term, but he ain't wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 11:09 PM
9

That double standard is perpetuated by women, tho. I mean, male pornstars do go through their own struggles as well when it comes to dating. However, men that sleep a lot tend to exhibit qualities that most women seek so highly that they choose to ignore the drawback of the men sleeping with multiple women. Again. Yes, it's a double standard, but women are the ones that let such a situation pass. They are the gatekeepers of sex. Not men. If monogamy in men was forced by high value women, then a …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 10:39 PM
-1

2) that you could have sex with a bunch of women, which is awesome and empowering. He said options. Not necessarily that he is going to sleep with every single one of them. He can pick the prettiest woman he can or the most compatible to him from the OPTIONS he has.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 10:18 PM
6

If men aren't putting effort, there's logic behind it. If women aren't putting up with low effort, there's also logic behind it. Average men aren’t putting the effort because, at the most, you only get a mildly interested woman who will compare you to all the other men she's currently dated or is dating. Women aren’t putting up with low effort because the sleazy handsome men they date already know they don't have to. These men treat women as disposable because they already gather all the attenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:40 PM
1

Either I'm taking crazy pills and took the bait or you have it backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:33 PM
-1

There's nothing Alpha about cheating and then trying to justify it. If a man gave his word that he was going to be monogamous to a woman or at least implied it by making her his girlfriend without making it absolutely clear that the relationship was open, then that man is a piece of shit. There. You happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 06:42 PM
6

Same experience here. I have been fortunate? enough to be on both sides of the attractiveness scale. While men would usually treat me when I was unattractive as just another dude. Women treated me with absolute disdain unless I provided some immediate value onto their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:49 PM
–

Get as many dates? Doubt it would change much, assuming you mean first dates. To get a first date as a woman, you have to be pretty and be receptive. Hard time finding partners? Not necessarily a hard time, just harder than it would currently be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:42 PM
–

Women do get rejected for the sexual past. Ergo, that's why they lie or omit. Ergo, going back to your main question. Taking accountability would mean facing rejection more often because they wouldn't lie or ommit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:36 PM
0

So you admit men see evidence, but throw it out the window due to childish wishful thinking What wishful thinking did I infer in my original description? That men see hot men get women and conclude that the reason they get women is because they are hot? How is that wishful thinking? That is literally observing a phenomenon taking place. It’s men who seek platitudes, why in the hell would little girls or women know why other women aren’t interested in him? “Because you aren’t attractive” would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 06:31 AM
1

Added a little bit more to my comment before you responded. If u can edit ur comment with the rest of ur response and I'll reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 06:03 AM
2

Men have observed all of those scenarios, and they constantly asked themselves: "Why?" "Oh it's because they are hot" It's women that come out of the woodworks and behemently deny that simple observation: "Um actually it's because of their personality." "Just be yourself. You will find a woman soon enough." It's women that deny and gaslight regular men and boys growing up, into thinking that personality is the end all be all to get women. When I was in college, I was over 200 pounds overweight. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:56 AM
3

It’s shocking to a lot of people how much things have to be spelled out for a lot of guys. They are so… literal. Not taking in any contextual data points. The problem of contextual data points is that different people will achieve different conclusions with the same data sets. That's why sciences are literal for the most part. If you start dealing with subjectivity and non-objective evidence, you end up with a whole worth of nothing as presentable evidence. That's why men operate on literal evid…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:44 AM
1

This doesn't make sense. Even if the kind of people that got into the show were the dumbest of people, why did the men still thrive and the women did not?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:32 AM
1

Then why the duality? Why will the same woman have sex with a hunk guy but then set all these different rules for other men? I don't think men complain about women doing the whole 90 day thing, men complain when women set these expectations onto them, then turn around and have sex with somebody she just met.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:08 PM
21

It's quite common to see guys sharing their virginity status here, and these posts often get a lot of upvotes. And? I'm not a virgin and I still upvote them. Many threads revolve around the difficulty of getting attention from women and the perceived high standards of women. Yes. I can be a man that lost his virginity and still comment how hard the dating market has become. Crazy concept I know. It's not a stretch to suggests this subreddit likely has an above-average proportion of sexually unsu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:05 PM
2

Numbers game mostly. While it is true that women in general get more STIs than men, bisexual and gay men are the most likely to have STIs. Now from what I understand STI prevalence on bi and gay men isn't particularly the reason why women aren't open to dating bi men, it's mostly because of submission and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 11:06 PM
1

Answered all your questions with my other comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 07:06 PM
10

basic care like getting a test and some penicillin to fight off one of those infections was more difficult, and the rates were down? Tbf the study is tracking how much increased not how it was combated. Whether somebody had an STI and had penicillin or not didn't matter in the study because it still counted as somebody having an STI. That seems moreso like it’s evidence of how the lockdowns caused a bunch of secondary problems that lead to non covid related illnesses and deaths rising than anyth…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 06:44 PM
45

The new report provides final surveillance data for 2021, and shows that overall in a single year (2020-2021): Gonorrhea rates increased more than 4% Syphilis rates surged, increasing nearly 32% for combined stages of the infection Among the syphilis data, cases of congenital syphilis rose by an alarming 32% and resulted in 220 stillbirths and infant deaths. Chlamydia rates increased nearly 4%, but – unlike gonorrhea and syphilis – still did not return to pre-pandemic levels This raises concerns…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 06:09 PM
9

It still gives you better odds than online apps. Out of 10 people, 6 are women and 4 are men that enroll an American college. So you should have better odds of meeting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:27 AM
0

Tbf are you gonna date his mom?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:25 PM
1

Yep. I think people that criticize Dread game is because they believe that men apply it for months on end, instead of intermittently depending on the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:10 AM
14

Or the default sub that exists solely to shit on men. Can't believe TwoX is a default sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 03:45 AM
–

Maybe a torque lecture?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:18 AM
5

Me too. I don't deny seeing them. I just said that at the very least from my personal experience, even overweight women are picky with the men they date. It's more common to see a skinny or average built guy dating an overweight woman than the reverse, but it is even far more common to see two people who are overweight dating each other. Now, as to your comment about Leagues, one of my friends explained it best: "Just because sometimes you can land shots from the 3pt line doesn't mean you are an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:04 AM
16

When I was overweight and in college, I used to hang around women who were overweight. By all metrics of attractiveness, they were playing in the same field as I. Yet none of them ever dated overweight guys. They would rather have been single than date another of their weight class. They all ended up dating men who were slightly above their league. The men who were overweight and asked them out were largely ignored, and they often mocked these men in front of me despite me being a man and also o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 09:54 PM
3

Less than 1% lmao. Who's actually drawing conclusions with this sample size?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 03:32 AM
4

Tbf most kind and good natured chads tend to get settled down quite quickly (just like the women actually) so very rarely do you see one single, unless he has a pletora of other issues or other circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 02:11 AM
1

I largely agree with your statements, but since this is a cmv post here, I go: Men do "praise" high value men because by definition: Verb: express warm approval or admiration of. Noun: the expression of approval or admiration for someone or something. They want to BE them. They might not fall down to their knees and suck these high value men, but they certainly take their words seriously and are impressionable for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 11:13 PM
14

Don't men just accept it? They say "yeah she's batshit crazy, but she's hot tho." Most of them don't do the mental gymnastics for these women. They however do mental gymnastics for women that they have fallen over hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 12:41 PM
1

Barely in the context of that sentence doesn't equal to amount, but rather that it barely crosses the threshold of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 07:58 PM
–

Not sure why you are laughing when it's the case. Men are usually more stoic and tend to control their violent emotions far better than women. It's when they explode that shit hits the fan. The same cant be said with women. Women blow shit way out of proportion and tend to get more violent and emotionally agressive (scream, insult light slaps etc but not murderous) than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 01:54 PM
22

It's more like they don't have to get rejection from women so they fall on AI girlfriends. I think it's rather facinating because it goes against the narrative that all lonely and dateless men just want a woman to fuck and they don't view them as beings, yet here they are effectively only talking and flirting, barely sexting with an AI. It seems to me that there is something that these men crave more than just sex and somebody to sleep with. They want somebody to talk to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 12:39 PM
–

And women invented the term "fuck zone" your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/23 11:39 AM
2

First of all I'm not the guy who you originally responded to. Second of all there's nothing wrong with anything you have said. HOWEVER if I have MULTIPLE female friends and colleagues come up to me, after us hanging out, express their desires or wishes of getting into a relationship with me, despite me thinking that I made no clear indication of ever alluding to that possibility, then I need to take a step back and take a good look at my actions and behaviors around them. Because clearly somethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 02:08 PM
6

Platonic is the key word. Most of the times there are two kinds of women that hang out with only men, girls that from the start create respectable boundaries with their male friends, and women who like to flirt and tiptoe around, teasing "what ifs" with their male friends almost all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 01:46 PM
0

You even said this girl is known for doing this. So every guy does a friend hang out with the “friends only” girl hoping they are secretly the one to break on through? Only one side is being unreasonable here, and it’s the guys. Both sides are in the wrong. The woman clearly is playing on the men's feeling for attention/control/ego, then turns around and claims "we are just friends". The men clearly use the excuse of being her friend to try to get into her pants, failing miserably.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 01:44 PM
1

It's not proving your point at all. They were prompted up by social media so much as these untouchable and godly champions for years, and this year they went out with a whimper. So yeah, people are gonna make fun of THE PLAYERS for finally getting an ego check.Not because they are WOMEN. Unless your logic also applies to men, because if that's the case then everytime people make fun of Lebron James not winning a final in the NBA would also classify as harassment and discrimination. That's again,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 05:17 PM
2

One recent one was the women’s US soccer team getting laughed at by the conservative media for losing the World Cup. That isn't a struggle nor is it discrimination. That being said, considering how the women's US Soccer team, tried to argue that the league was sexist and patriarchal, despite getting an overall better deal on their contracts, while still getting the bonus from the league in "good will" is pretty bullshit. Plus the way the media specially their own league tried to portray them as …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 11:53 AM
10

You're doing it again where you justify not giving them what they want which is validation of their claims that its not equal and that we should work towards equality. Uh. My dude. I said there's already equal chance of opportunities. If you want to apply for a high earning position and you have the qualifications for it, nobody is stopping you from becoming the next CEO. But you dont want that, what you want is equal outcomes. Aka as long as you are a woman you should get a high earning job on …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 06:00 AM
15

I mean there's equal opportunities to get to high earning positions. Just not equal outcome. You say you want equal representation but that would tailor in doing something close to affirmative action towards women (which already is happening in STEM jobs). Same thing with congress. Newsflash men arent the majority of voters. It's women. You guys put other men there, not men. The reason why you don't see more women running for office is the same reason you don't see more women approaching men. Wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 05:52 AM
17

So that means 69% of men are fucking 81% of women (in that specific age range) which is very far from the 80/20 discourse. 80/20 comes from online dating which makes sense given the numbers here. point is that that in barely 20 years there was a 11% increase in sexless men. That's 1 in 3 young men and there's no signs it's gonna stop increasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 07:16 PM
21

https://www.healthline.com/health-news/young-adults-especially-men-having-sex-less-frequently Here: Between 2000-2002 and 2016-2018, past-year sexual inactivity rose from almost 19 percent to almost 31 percent among men ages 18 to 24, according to researchers led by Dr. Peter Ueda, a postdoctoral researcher at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden. Sexual inactivity among women of the same age remained relatively constant, rising from 15 percent to 19 percent over the same time period. …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 07:03 PM
-2

https://youtu.be/Y4E8qEDi_xg Straight from a Bi woman's mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:28 AM
-2

Talk to bisexual women that have dated other women. It's a total shitshow because both of them expect the other to give their resources to the other while they are dating. They also tend to be the most divorced and the rates of female to female domestic abuse is higher than both male/female and /male/male domestic abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:26 AM
2

The guy that calls you maidenless in Elden Ring used to also say the line i'm referencing in the beta. Unfortunately it was so aggressive (because he is as the first NPC you actually talked to) a bunch of players would kill him so FromSoft removed the line to make him less aggressive. Imagine yourself moving into a new neighborhood and the first guy you talk to calls you bitchless and to kill yourself somewhere out of his sight. That's basically the NPC.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:26 AM
1

Feel free to go off and die in a ditch somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:33 PM
20

Isn't that the black pill which is also banned here or am I mistaking it for something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 02:21 AM
5

Initiating? It's such a small adult challenge compared to say, getting a job you like or building a friend group. I cant imagine being salty about it, unless I was also resentful of women in general. Try initiating in person to 40 women and deal with their rejections. Far easier to be passive and complain than deal with the potential hit to their ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 04:58 AM
1

Dude what the fuck are you doing in this sub too? Holy shit. League players are truly a different breed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 12:11 PM
6

In this imaginary universe : They were delusional and you weren’t. Some of them did, not all of them. But to seriously entertain the idea that they could land somebody close to a Jock was baffling to me. Your chances are 0 with Becky. Even if it’s 5% with Bertha how is that not better than 0? I'm not saying it isn't. But to say they don't have aproximately the same standards is just well wrong. For some of the girls I shot my shot that were in my league at the time, genuinely thought I was benea…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:51 PM
8

Yeah, men usually treat women like children. Which if you see it from a woman's perspective it is kind of a dick move. But I digress.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 04:09 PM
3

In an online survey that 570 Healthline readers answered, 34 percent of men said they’d be willing to get an injection that blocks the flow of sperm for several months while 66 percent said they wouldn’t. When asked if they’d be willing to receive a series of shots that blocked sperm production, 27 percent said “Yes” while 73 percent said “No.” And what does this have to do wether or not a male BC has been developed? There is a medical reason as to it's been harder to develop a male BC. Of cours…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 10:00 PM
3

But that's not what you said. You said that THE REASON there ISN'T a male contraceptive like BC is because MEN don't want to. When it's clearly bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:37 PM
4

Men also have refused to finish a single trial for a male birth control pill despite women tolerating them and finishing them for decades What? More like it hasn't been properly developed. Jesus christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:37 PM
3

They can't imagine this because they don't go out and fuck people if they can't foot the expenses. I know we are all mad at the Supreme Court decision but you shouldn't have sex if you can't afford both contraception and the possibility of having a kid/abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:32 PM
0

LMFAO, True. I generally agreed with what she was saying until right then and there. If i can't fucking afford to have a child I don't go out and fuck a girl. It's like the concept of personal accountability goes right out the window when women and men have consensual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 06:30 PM
3

Well isn't that women's problem then? I think the real problem is that men don't have standard This sentence alone contradicts itself. Men can't reliably set the standards because they are inherently playing the numbers game. Most men already do not have the luxury to choose who they can date because they get no dates at all. So of course men don't have standards, for the most part, having standards severely limits the amount of women that they might have a interest in. The standards are set by …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 11:43 AM
5

how the fuck does that work? An average needs to exist for the person to be attractive or unattractive. An objective average exists. The problem comes when women vastly overestimate the qualities of an actual average man. In the U.S. an average man is a man that is slightly more on the heavier side that is 5'8 and has a $40k to $60k a year salary. Guess how many women are looking for this, at the very least online. Very few. I love this sub as a source of cheap entertainment but y'all stupid as …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 11:16 AM
2

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/640/962/d91.gif Jesus man for a second I thought this was /r/roastme.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 02:54 PM
6

ADHD has made it harder for me. I tend to always look around the room i'm in even while directly talking to another person so from their perspective this either means i am disinterested or nervous. Same thing with conversations. I could be having a normal conversation about her hobbies or something and if something makes me curious I keep asking her one too many questions about it. It's like an urge to always go down the rabbit hole for anything that piques my interest. Sometimes it's great, oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:13 PM
1

If your 30-year-old wife will be cheating on you at 36 (because AWALT/hypergamy/women can bang whenever they want), why would your 24-year-old wife not be cheating on you at 47 From what I understand the difference is that you aren't committing for the 24 year old. You date her, become sugar daddy or whatever but the intent is direct. I doubt a 24 year old would marry a 50 year old or vice-versa, however they are at least clear on their intentions. Sex and companionship for money/status without …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 08:19 PM
1

when you argue that women would be attracted to young men most (peak physical condition, peak fertility) it switches to "but my resources." Except the argument is not that women do that and it's wrong, but rather the selective enforcement of AF/BB behaviors on men is wrong. That's the crux of the issue when it comes to arguments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 07:55 PM
3

TBF it can be a self fulfilling loop.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 02:01 PM
–

This is why the gap exists. Yes, women hit men just as much, but the capacity of being a serious threat is almost negligible. It's not like women whom hit men use items to amplify the damage they do to their partners. Like knives, broom handles, pans etc right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:53 PM
15

That second one happened to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:39 PM
7

Girls trying to be my friend only for them to try and get into a relationship. People treating your body like public property (leave me alone, I just want to watch anime). Based and Redpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 10:51 PM
2

“Plates” “bitches” “whores”, etc. TRP literally teaches and encourages men to use women to get what men want from them and then discard them. In order to even get to that point the man has that came to TRP has to have done significant self-improvement either physical or mental in order to be able to get enougth women to call them plates. Y’all are deluding yoursekves if you chalk it up to just “self improvement” and “acceptance of women” lol Acceptance of women's NATURE. You forgot the most impo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 10:49 PM
7

I still remember the femcel sub getting privated because they were being harassed by men asking for dates. Like you can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 08:27 PM
2

she has to date dudes that put an orangutang penis photo as their profile Pretty sure that profile was made as a joke and not an actual serious profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 03:28 AM
7

Yeah but, 9 months? Jesus christ. At that point are you even really dating or are you just hanging out with a best friend?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 05:54 PM
6

you don't think there's a pay gap between men and women? When you account for the same job, the same marital status, age etc there is no wage gap and in recent years, young women are out-earning their male counterparts. https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2010/09/01/young-single-women-outearn-men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 02:56 AM
3

So this has essentially led to girls seeing themselves as hot shit. Whether its true or not, it doesnt matter how they look without make up the day of a hangover in real life. It absolutely does matter. Because that's the face that she wakes up and sees every time she looks in the mirror. A couple of filters won't change that. they percieve themselves as their BEST version which is what they present on socials and on nights out etc. They delude themselves into thinking they are their best versio…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:43 PM
6

Women wear heels or make their legs look longer and their ass look better. Once men start wearing heels to compensate for height Weren't heels and makeup primarily used by men before women started using them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-heeled_shoe Says the Persian army started using them, then it became a sort of symbol for Royalty and the High-class.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 04:34 PM
1

Monster.....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:31 AM
1

Because that number keeps increasing, just like the number of men whom don't get any. Like. It's a worrying trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 01:17 PM
2

30 some percent of women actually use F boys and they share about 20% of men. That's not "women". It means that a significant statistical portion of WOMEN share and use fuckbois. Just because YOU might not agree with it, doesn't mean they aren't women. 3 out of 9 women fuck the same guy. That's still women. Not Men, not Aliens, and it's not insignificant to ignore either. If I said that 1 in 3 women get sexually harassed at work, would it then be wrong to say this: Women get sexually harassed at…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 04:04 AM
23

men bullshit about things that never actually happened, talk up their own game when they're drunk, and make jokes, but they aren't actually sharing details of their sex life with anyone they care about. Dudes talking about a girl before the date: "Dude, she's got a fucking big ass." "Nice, You better hit that bro." "Pfft, of course." Dudes after the date: "Dude did u get some?" "Yep." "Nice." "Indeed." "Wanna play some Ps4?" "Yep."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 03:48 AM
9

Epstein, Nygard These people literally made hiring girls their business. Completely different from the random stock broker that has a yacht that random girls want to climb aboard with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 05:22 AM
9

George Washington was a stepfather, and Joseph is Jesus's stepfather Yeah, but back then, women were still either considered to be incapable of self supporting themselves or they weren't allowed to self support. So it was more acceptable for a man to marry a woman with children. Now they are able to self support, and have their full autonomy of their actions, which in turn SHOULD entail personal responsibilities. The problem is however, that the majority of single mothers right now are just look…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:48 AM
10

I don't think there was ever a point when men actually made single moms a priority. They never were to begin with. It's just that it was more acceptable for men to date women that already had children back then than it is right now, which is pretty ironic. Considering that women with children out of wedlock were basically shunned by the entire town/family.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 03:44 AM
26

I know a guy that does plumbing, he had studied to be a nurse, he says it's easier to manage pipelines filled with shit than a person shitting himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 12:49 AM
9

It is, but clearly there's a difference between a person that thinks the are always persecuted and the world is out to get them, and somebody like me, whom just wanted to ground you in reality by mentioning how it's not really that unusual that so many men are here participating. Women here and on TwoXChromosomes have incredible victim complexes, yet you don't see it being mentioned in every PPD thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 12:44 AM
6

You think reading ppd helps you in this ? :D Not necessarily, but men are more likely to find all the "pill" dating philosophies than women are. Which in turn would also find this sub since to contribute to be able to contribute to the conversation, you have to know "pill" material. Also, yes, there have been a steadily increase in men here for the last couple of years compared to before that. Could it be because the dating market is so skewed towards women that more and more men naturally end u…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 12:31 AM
13

Women are a minority on here Reddit is primarily a male dominated website. Men are probably more likely to engage in debate subs. Men are also more likely to find information to improve their dating than women, since typically it is easier for women to date than men. Of course it's going to be a male dominated sub. The majority of reddit fucking is. Plus, most of the active mods here are women and they mostly are impartial. Shoutout to Mrs. Degree or I as like to call her, The thread MOAB. If an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 11:50 PM
14

Nah, also a hispanic thing. We say "mujer" "chica" "nena" all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 11:46 PM
4

The Manuals Mason, what do the Manuals mean??? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 12:39 PM
5

Stigma and money. Paying upwards of 300 bucks for a date is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/21 02:40 PM
2

"Female" is the scientific definition of a woman. In a way, when somebody refers to a woman "female" they are trying to degrade them by subliminally referring to them as animals, since the term "female", at least online, is only ever used to refer to animals. Same thing with "male" for men. At least when feminism uses it. Keep in mind this is mostly based on interactions online and doesn't distinguish between places. At least where I live people usually refer to each other as the equivalent of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 11:54 PM
15

"well of course it doesn't really mean that they're just supposed to believe it now and the nuance will come later." Because the most of the people that come into contact with Red Pill are men whom are extremely pussy-whipped and blue pilled and ALREADY are having difficulty not being nuanced. "All women are queens", "All women can do no wrong", "I don't try to change who I am, why do girls not like me" "I just have to wait for my crush to realize how good I am so that I can ask her out" etc etc…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 02:47 AM
8

Because at the end of the fucking day, a family that is enslaved but alive under the Taliban is better than the one that is burned alive and beheaded which is precisely what will happen if the men that helped the U.S. stay and the Taliban finds out that they helped the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 03:42 AM
8

Lmfao. How dense can you be? Afghan people don't care about their country, they only care about their specific sect. That army had already laid down their arms even before Biden ordered to pull out. Most of them don't care about their country.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 03:41 AM
8

"average" woman more pleasant to be around than the "average" man Could be because it's easier to be an average woman than a man so they don't get as hung up with bad experiences or situations that later turn into massive personality issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 04:45 PM
24

Because then they turn around when they are older or when they want serious relationships and realize that the men whom were willing to sleep with them aren't the same ones whom would like to marry them. So then they go around in social media talking shit about all men and complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 04:44 PM
4

platonic female friends F
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 03:59 PM
26

Better than low-tier men? Hell yes. Unattractive men and overweight men are treated with disdain and disgust, unattractive women and overweight women are treated like average men AKA invisible and unremarkable to most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/21 04:01 PM
15

Wait. I thought women had a fuckboi-radar that automatically detects when guys have shit personalities. Did it malfunction?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 11:27 AM
4

Trust me, assholes have probably more self respect than most people, because they don't take shit from anybody, even if they are wrong. lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 07:07 AM
2

Being nice helps you when you start as friends, as long as you have boundaries and don't get played. But other than that being nice doesn't help you for shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 07:00 AM
13

Men only act like this when it’s a man wronging a woman. Or maybe because he can most likely get away with it? Dude gets a date, they go eat, immediately they hook up in his apartment and then he whips it out in front of her. Most men will never be in a position when they can just do this with no repercussions unless they have multiple options, and with the way she felt offended, something tells me he was talking to multiple women he had already matched. Like is he an asshole? Yes he is. Is it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 03:11 AM
1

Homeless women are more vulnerable than homeless men. It is worse to be a homeless woman than it is to be a homeless man. Yes, they are more vulnerable than homeless men. But they have way more resources to get OUT of homelessness in the first place. Both from Historical and Cultural values but also with new more modern resources like all the extra women-only free non-profit organizations that are in place today. But it is not an option. Words do have definitions you know. Someone being more vul…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 08:18 PM
2

But homeless men aren't at risk of being abducted, killed, or forced into sex work Lmfao what. You have to be kidding me. Homeless men get killed all the time and drug addicts will 100% do sex work for drugs regardless. You are delusional and you clearly do not know what you are talking about. Which part of what I said is delusional, was it that? Homelessness is not an option. That is your delusion. Go walk up to a homeless guy and tell him that his homelessness is optional lmfao. Homeless women…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 07:59 PM
3

Yeah maybe, I certainly wouldn't deny that some men would indeed react and say such things. But I wager the majority wouldn't simply know how to respond to that. It's less to do with malice and more to do with how men work. Why do you think that women complain that men tend to not actually listen to their problems? That the men immediately go into "let's fix it mode" instead of "I'll let you vent and just let it all out" when their gfs or female friends talk about their problems. So at the very …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 08:43 AM
1

For women, homelessness is not an option. It's life or death. For men, it's not life or death. It's an option. A terrible one, but an option. Imagine being this delusional and misandrist. Most homeless people are veterans that have really bad mental issues, most of which are men. It's not an "option" for them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 08:38 AM
2

i sure as hell haven't told other men (except my gay best friend and his partner) that i was raped by another man when i was 17. Tbf that's something that is highly personal and should be confided with very close friends. Probably that's why you only communicated to your best friend. I do the same with my mental health issues. But it's not just because of the social stigma behind it, but also because why would I burden other people with my own problems? They already have their own shit to deal w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 08:25 AM
7

spaces exist because there are less women in those fields and they generally get a ton of shit from their male counterparts Nobody disagrees with this. The problem comes when those clubs and requirements are purposely lowered for women. There's a difference between making somebody an offer that is attractive sales-wise (like having tons of extra-resources available for women) and purposely lowering the requirement JUST because they are of a certain gender. Specially when at the end of the day, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 10:48 PM
6

Yes because women tend to poison themselves or take pills or cut themselves which give people around them plenty of time to react and save them. Holy christ. It's also well documented that people who tend to use these methods tend to care more about the attention the might get rather than their own death. Men often die by suicide way more than women. Because when a guy does it, they typically try to go for the quickest and most efficient way of ending their lives in case they fuck up. People loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 10:43 PM
4

their wives completely lack perspective as do many women living their lifestyles. If you lurk around relationship subs, you'll find scenarios where women open up their marriage, thinking they could get easy hot sex with other men while their husbands just sit with their cocks out, but then turns out that the husband manages to get women to sleep/date and the women suddenly cannot believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 12:51 AM
1

swinging would have solved it. But doesn't that go against her hiding her past? It's not like your typical girl-next-door woman will just ask her husband to open their marriage. her husband let himself become low desire Kinda happens when you have to shoulder the responsibility of keeping 3 other people alive and well-fed. blaming male chauvinism Nothing new here. That's just the de-facto hamster excuse that women use every-time they are caught in morally compromising situations that they create…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 12:48 AM
6

Because the study is generally accepted here as accurate. YOU MADE THE CLAIM that went against the current. You have to back it up. The fuck is wrong with you? Have you ever officially done a debate before for academic purposes? You sound like a flat-earther: "Oh have you seen the Earth's circumference and curvature? No? Then, You can't disprove the claim I made without evidence that the Earth is indeed flat. Back it up."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:15 AM
5

Because you made that claim. A claim with no evidence mind you. Yet you sit there and act as if it's the truth JUST BECAUSE you mentioned the study in a reply to somebody saying that certain studies are misrepresented. That is not evidence for anybody to believe that the study in by itself is misrepresented and flawed. It's like a journalist quoting himself on an article and acting as if he is Harvard or Oxford. "Ah yes, indeed I have the references where people agree with what I'm saying, of co…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:08 AM
6

Dude. You said that the study was flawed and misrepresented right? A study that in this subreddit, it is considered to be correct, right? That study from your point of view is flawed and incorrect and grossly inflates numbers, right? Therefore, in your opinion, whom has to provide evidence to back up their claim? The subreddit that generally accepts that study as correct, or the individual that is going against the trend and saying that it is flawed? Simple logic here, please answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:01 AM
7

YOU MADE THE CLAIM THAT THE STUDY WAS FLAWED. THEREFORE THE BURDEN OF EVIDENCE FALLS ON YOU NOT US. If I was the one whom had originally said that I would have provided the evidence in detail. Any debate class/college class that teaches you how to make a research paper and investigation teaches this. Jesus christ. Not that hard. I already told you that I don't have the original study in hand to reference. But since you were the one whom had read the original one and pointed out it flaws then you…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:54 AM
5

I didn’t make the claim to begin with - back up your claim, or don’t Oh really???? Then wbo the fuck made this comment then: Honestly, the biggest example of this is the much ballyhooed “30% of men are sexless” stat. When you look at the study, they asked if men had had sexual contact with a woman They then didn’t filter out gay men, bi men who only slept with men, men who lost their virginity before the age of 18 (the average age for men to lose their virginity is 17), men who opted out of dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:50 AM
6

Ok, so you can’t find the study you claim to be an expert in? I’m not the one touting the study as God’s truth - I’m poking holes in it I never fucking said I was an expert in it. Nor am I saying that the study is 100% credible. You are the one who is swimming against the current and critisizing the study, yet you cannot even provide the actual study and section where indeed they distinguish that they only ask of men if they have had sex with ONLY women. If you can’t defend what you claimed was …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:45 AM
6

I edited the comment on top so you probably didn't read this part: As if the person here whom is criticizing the study and calling it flawed and "grossly inflated" was me. If you are so sure in what you mention as a statement of fact, why can't you link the original study then? Cuz I sure as hell don't know how to navigate the website in question. (Plus it's 12:30 am where I currently live so, kinda tired). I'll try to find it when I get on a computer since I'm on mobile right now and I'm fallin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:36 AM
7

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889124/ Because I personally do not know how to navigate the actual GSS website. There are multiple official research papers and articles that directly reference the study. So to imply that the study is false or fake is just plain stupid. Or that somehow we are biased because we can't find the original study. As if the person here whom is criticizing the study and calling it flawed and "grossly inflated" was me. If you are so sure in what you mention…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:32 AM
6

I can't find the study. I've tried to look for it, but the articles that reference it only point to the GSS website. Not the actual study. But hey sure it's my bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:25 AM
10

Wait. So you think that certified professors that research family-related topics, that frequently publish papers in prestigious online academic journals are somehow conservative and ergo bad/wrong? Jesus christ. I thought people were stupid but this is a new low. Regardless of wether or not the guy is a conservative means shit to me. He clarified that the SURVEY DOES INDEED ASK if men have had any kind of sex, whether hetero or homo.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:13 AM
12

Wait what. Lmfao. This guy is legit the opposite of that. He is a sociology professor that frequently publishes papers on Oxford and U.C Berkley and has made multiple research papers turned into books. He's probably one of the people that are farthest away from the redpill/conservative circles. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:05 AM
11

The guy whom you are describing as incel is a Professor in the Department of Family and Consumer Studies and Adjunct Professor of Sociology at the University of Utah. I linked his article because he explains that the survey asked for both. Not just one. I don't know what an IFS guy even means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 03:59 AM
12

What percent of the male population is gay and/or Bi? I'd wager a very small minority. So I don't understand why it is "grossly inflated" when they compose a very small percentage of the population. http://www.nicholaswolfinger.com/blog/2019/04/02/evaluating-the-accuracy-of-general-social-survey-sex-data/ Also you are DEAD wrong about what the survey actually talks about. They ask whether or not people have had sex, regardless of wether it is heterosexual or homosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 03:19 AM
50

No No you see it's because ONLY 20% of men shower and get haircuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:00 PM
14

We couldn't care less if our friend fucks/dates an ugly dude, but men seem to care a whole lot. Why? Ah yes. Because girls don't constantly criticize and compare guys they date. Girls routinely call out other girls that date "inferior" men, if they are friends with those other women. Don't be disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:55 PM
7

If it's not scientology he gets mocked for being small. At least that's true for reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:28 AM
12

You know what sucks? Being the the shortest guy at 5'8 in your friend group just because all of you met through Basketball and other sports. Some of the girls I have met with them instantly recognize me in public because I'm the shortest one. They usually ask for my taller friends tho. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 03:38 AM
2

Doubt it since idk if you noticed but ..... Serial killers are rare, and the ones we do know, only because they were caught. The FBI predicts there are about 50 active Serial Killers in the U.S. at any given time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 12:31 PM
17

Eventually it comes out. Usually your female friends spill the beans. Sometimes you encounter her random ex-bfs or ex-hookup partners while on a date etc. And if we keep an open non-judgemental relationship with the girl, she eventually spills the beans herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 12:26 PM
1

On average women tend to date a guy that is 3-5 years older than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 05:19 PM
–

Don't you know that you can't self-describe yourself as "nice" without having a negative connotation anymore? Only niceguys tm call themselves "nice" which means you are a niceguy tm creep incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 09:10 PM
18

What does it matter mon cherie? You are engaging in a debate sub, the entire purpose of this subreddit is to try to find the "why" in things, in this case, human behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 07:47 PM
1

According to stats ,at least 30% of men below 30 couldn't get laid once within a year and men famously overreport in these things. Most men would RATHER report that they actually HAVE sex than report that they DON'T have sex. How is it that you think that most men "famously" report themselves as never having sex when every masculine social stigma SHAMES them for not getting sex. It's backwards mentality. If anything most men are probably lying and reporting that they did have sex when in reality…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 10:50 PM
1

Because my physical preferences are typically soft preferences. She used to have in her Tinder bio, something like "Looking for guys between 5'5-5'9, if you are taller than that please don't message me". So in her mind it was a requirement. She just never actually unconsciously enforced it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:49 PM
2

Have you considered that she looks for very soft men? Considering that all her boyfriends were almost hyper masculine to the point that you could call it "toxic-masculinity" I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:45 PM
9

Never said the opposite. I'm just saying that is not just a coincidence that almost all of her boyfriends have been significantly taller than her. There's a pattern in her behavior and what she unconsciously looks for in a boyfriend doesn't directly correlate with what she consciously says she wants. Might not be black and white, but there's certainly something that is consistent from her behavior. She tends to go with taller guys even when she has the choice to pick a smaller guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 03:54 AM
24

I know one pretty girl (she's like an 8 imo) that is studying for her MD, that always says that she prefers shorter guys (IIRC she's 5'1) her last 4 boyfriends have all been 5'11+. I have known her for 5 years now, I have never seen her dating or even considering a smaller guy to a date. She might prefer smaller guys in the moment or in her hypothetical fantasies (Hell, every time she is single, she specifically says she wants to date smaller guys), but she always tends to date taller guys. If I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:57 AM
5

I'm chill bro. I'm just stating a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 07:33 PM
4

mostly men compliment them or ask for advice to get in their shape lol. Because it takes a shit ton amount of work, patience and time to be able to get in-shape, so of course as MEN we recognize that it's super hard therefore we "complement" them. It's not as easy as sitting in front of a mirror and applying make up for an hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 07:28 PM
6

On a large American university campus, 63 men from two social fraternities provided anthropometric measurements, facial photographs, voice recordings, and reported mating success (number of sexual partners). These men also assessed each other’s dominance, and 72 women from two socially affiliated sororities assessed the men’s attractiveness. Results indicate that dominance and the traits associated with it predict men’s mating success , but attractiveness and the traits associated with it do not…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:03 AM
11

Doesn't this just make you a hypocrite? Depends. If you look at it from the worldview that you already know BOTH of those situations (Leo and friends dating younger women = female hypergamy) then sure it is a hypocrisy. However most men that come across the red pill don't know this. They only know that men do trade women with younger versions, but they don't know the female equivalent of that. Most of them still place women on a pedestal. They still have the "all women can do no wrong" world vie…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 01:44 AM
2

I agree with everything you have said.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 12:25 AM
7

I'm 25, I don't know anybody my age who likes these things. I briefly dated a girl who liked crystals and yoga. Wrong circles. I'm a 23m computer engineer student and most of the girls in my circles are into D&D, Pokemon, Video Games or Cosplay/Anime or at the very least don't immediately recoil when someone mentions any of these topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 11:58 PM
0

When i lost weight at 19 i went on a rampage and slept with about a dozen women sophomore year of college alone. Then i realized the casual bar hopping life was getting boring and stopped. I grew up. Same here. But tbf it took me a year to stop and go full monk mode because I realized that I still had too many personal biases and grudges towards women that I needed to work out. But a year vs an entire decade is a big difference tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 11:50 PM
10

while the others ( even the ones she rejeceted ) stood up for her ( simping for her ) against the guy again even though she is litearlly what a guy dont want in a woman You do understand that it's a show, and these men also get paid the more they appear on the show, and at minimum if they win they get $100k, right? Why would all the men band together against the woman when they are also competing to win? The guy was completely in the right, but he also shot himself in the foot by calling her out…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 04:59 AM
2

If a women shouted about how she was furious, she’d be labeled as crazy. How is this not extreme anger?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 06:02 PM
13

What ideal are you talking about tho? Most men are looking for women their age with their relative SMV, because these are the ones that they have the most potential with. Yet for many men they won't get to be successful in that department.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 06:50 AM
13

Hugh Jackman had one scene I think in X-Men Origins: Wolverine where he was supposed to be completely naked. The production team "pranked" him by making him enter a room where all the female personnel were, whom wooed at him. Reverse the roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 03:09 AM
7

Tennis. Same thing happened to the U.S. Women's National Soccer team, they got destroyed by a U-15 FC (under 15 year olds) kids team. https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 01:03 AM
3

Yep. The only push I have seen that included men are from the LGBTQ+ community.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 06:46 PM
2

The point he is making is that both men and women treat ugly people different, regardless of actual attraction or lack thereof. But since most women conceal how attractive they are by using makeup, they don't experience that amount of judgement until the few occasions when they don't wear make up, while men can't hide their ugliness. If a man meets a woman with make-up on, they treat her kinder and more positively than the same woman without make up. The sudden recoil of "men judge based on how …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:24 PM
3

Let face facts, hypergamy can't exist in lesbian relationship. Unironically it's harder for lesbians and bisexual women to get dates with other women than with men. When both women expect to get courted and have somebody else take the lead and woo them, things get grinded to a halt. An interesting fact: Female to Female relationships have higher rates of domestic violence specially psychological abuse than both Male to Male relationships and Male to Female relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:17 PM
5

there are far more deadbeat fathers than mothers (and something like only 35 to 40 percent fully pay consistent child support) Consistent child support stat is kinda iffy, since I'm pretty sure that the way they calculate the amount of child support you have to give is dependant on your last job. If you lose that job or take a reduced salary after the court has already calculated child support (Assuming that the guy also has equal custody), the court won't change the total amount you need to pay…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 03:08 PM
1

There's more men in China than women though, by a significant amount. I don't think these women are suffering from a lack of options. Yes they are. Hence why the term herbivore men is a popular term that women use in those countries. If we talked about two women in those situations, which one is more desirable? Is it the same? Women's SMV values age more than status. Men's SMV values status more than age. Keywords: More than. So yes status does still matter, but they matter less than age for a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 03:39 AM
2

So you're saying men are more desirable as they get old but women are less. That's pretty standard sexism. And men are less desirable the younger they are, since most of their SMV comes from status, financial sutation etc. A guy whom is a college freshman living with his parents while he studies an undergraduate degree is less desirable than a software engineer that is living on his own and has disposable income. Is this sexism as well? Personally I only date younger men, which I bet will be mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 03:14 AM
14

Most of these women won't even send the first message to men they match with online. They're definitely not forcing anyone to date them. Most women don't send the first message. So this isn't out of the ordinary. What they are doing is writing "no hookups" on their dating profiles and refusing to sleep with Joe McRandom. It is the men complaining online who won't take no for an answer. No, men are usually laughing at the delusion and absurdity that some of these women have when they go on OLD ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 12:44 PM
5

Q1-Is ''John Shaming'' (guys paying for sex) mostly a Western thing? No, because just as you have said, even in Latin-American cultures the stigma is not as heavy as the U.S. Q2-Do you really think it's about paying for sex the problem (prostitution) or the reason/context he paid for it? I mean ignoring the moral/religious reasons to not partake in it, the shaming often comes from the context. Elon Musk the millionare buying hookers for a night is very different from the Elon Musk the balding ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 09:54 PM
6

"increased male to male competition creates sexlessness" But it doesn't that's the point. Why is male to male competition a factor when a woman can just open up Tinder and look for the most attractive guy there. Point is that the women are holding on for far longer than before trying to find their "chad" because they have a further scope to search than before. It doesn't matter if average men compete against average men, the only competition that matters is of attractive men, and these men don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 02:30 AM
41

Inb4 female users mass downvote you and twist the words to make it sound as this is a good thing and that MEN are the ones who have more requirements and are more entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 02:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter