TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheBaredBodkin Archive

View 1 posts and 141 comments by TheBaredBodkin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes, that is what this site is becoming, but even as an echo-chamber, it could be kept to a higher standard than that of feminists. Women can behave badly and be perceived as being defensive, or as repaying debts of centuries. Anything men do at a feminist site will simply be seen as aggressive woman baiting, because what men do is often seen as aggressive very quickly. This means a Men's Rights Echo Chamber should be for testing ideas before going out to the World. It is as close as men can get…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:49 AM
1

I do not expect anything of Feminists. It is that we all know that anything women do is seen as defensive, and anything men do is seen as aggressive, and so Feminist baiting will rebound upon us and weaken our influence.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:43 AM
1

I do not have to imagine my arrogance when I have people like you to do that on my behalf. After all of it though, the point remains. Posting in an echo chamber so that you can boast of being expelled on another forum turns your own forum into an echo-chamber. It is calculated to do nothing useful. As John Cage joked, "I have nothing to say and I am saying it and that is poetry". Posting on feminist echo-chambers is exactly the same.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:10 AM
2

It is antagonistic to post at an echo chamber, and then turn your site into an echo chamber by boasting of how you were thrown out of their site. With respect, that was the whole point of posting there.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:05 AM
2

Women are the gatekeepers of sex - So it is pure power play because they can. Men are the gatekeepers of commitment, if a woman shames you then do not commit. In my opinion, she will shame you after you have commited even if not before, so do not commit - Best option is to stay away.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 05:09 PM
1

You see - Lowest form of wit! That is what it turns you into.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 05:04 PM
2

Shooting fish in a barrel. No talent necessary. Worthless pasttime
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:11 PM
8

Posting stuff on a Feminist Echo-Chamber is known by all here to be utterly pointless. The real debate happens elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 03:38 PM
3

The solution is simple, do not watch the TV or take part in the debates. Go Dark - and come election day the results will be a "shock", just like the UK vote to leave the UK.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 03:26 PM
1

That is what will happen for colonisation of new places. It will be a return to the need for functioning wombs. In fact, with the concept of "Breakaway Civilizations" getting more traction it seems clear that editing out "working Class" males, and replacing them with working-class functioning wombs will be a top priority of the Government-buying corporate elites. That is probably the truth behind the current anti-male social paradigm for which the academic radical feminists are willing stooges.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 03:22 PM
2

The truth is that "flirting" and "harassment" are determined by the accuser. The concept is deliberately woolly and ill-defined so that matters can be USED as NEEDED. The only way to avoid trouble is to stay away from women. Even if all is well, at first, they can change their mind later, if the need arises. The answer to your question is that Women do not have to have "Borders" in our Society, and so that means you do not know where the pitfalls are, and you cannot possibly know however hard yo…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 03:12 PM
0

Why post this under the heading of "Feminism" when it is clearly Corporatism steering the message. This is Gillette, and there have been similar problems at Google. Rightists always put the cart before the horse.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:53 PM
4

The problem is not simply one of a male mental health crisis. Part of the problem is that the crisis is pre-diagnosed as being the natural result of Toxic Masculinity, and no other narrative is allowed.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:49 PM
27

What is the point of posting anything to a Feminist site of any description? What are we going to learn that we do not know already, and how does it really help the cause of Men's Rights to make us appear antagonistic?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:46 PM
2

No - Women love money, and as long as you can provide money the women think that it is you they love, but if you get put on short time or are made redundant, then both you are her will find out that she loves nothing but material shite. - As george Carlin said, "Spending money they don't have on stuff they don't need - not too bright, folks! Not too bright!"
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:27 PM
5

The answer to them is; "Look, if you find us that bad then please leave us alone and go breed some place else, or, better still, go off and not breed at all" If Middle Class White women want to "fussy" themselves out of the gene pool I would say that was a mighty plus for the future of humanity.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:31 AM
10

Published without a name, with no chance to review the methodology, by the BBC. This is trash masquerading as news. Get rid of the license fee., I am sick of having to pay for this. When 72 cases of sexual assault have to be dropped because of withheld evidence of innocence, then it is clear that many people, not just men, doubt the value of many allegations. It is not empathy for men over women, which countless studies show to be nonsense. Studies show bias towards women in all walks of life. C…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 08:37 PM
8

Actually, lads, this is just the news the feminists have been waiting for - proof positive that Men are ante-homo-sapien-sapien. :)
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:22 PM
5

Correct me if I misunderstand, because I have to look up every second word here, but you are essentially saying that a) there is an "evolutionary bias" to ensure that women can bear children ("the maintenace of functioning wombs") and that b) feminism is enforcing this bias both industrially and technologically, which b) leaves no room for "all other demands for resources" and d) does this in such a way that social order crumbles from it. No - You are wrong. What I am saying is that Feminism = W…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:51 PM
2

Agreed. If you told a guy to play Russian Roulette with Three chambers packed he would look at you like your were crazy, but too many grin and bumble their way into marriage. They do it all when the pitfalls are as obvious as the Mouse Trap in the kids game.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:11 PM
7

Ultimately I see feminism as weaponised gynocentrism, the industrially and technologically facilitated exacerbation of evolutionary bias towards the maintenance of functioning wombs, enabled in such a way as to overrun all other demands for resources to the point of societal deterioration. This definition illustrates the broad insinuation that feminism is a form of Social Cancer, ["Noli Me Tangere" being a novel about Colonialism in the Philippines by Jose Rizal, my wife is from the Philippines,…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:23 PM
5

Men do show emotion, they show it all the time, it is just that they process it differently. Men prefer to process emotion through some form of action, women seem to prefer to process emotion verbally. Stoicism was a form of virtue ethics that posited that giving free reign to unchecked emotion caused trouble and solved nothing. The emotions should be acknowledged and channelled productively. I do not know how long the fashion for referring to men as being "toxic" will persist, but it is clear t…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:56 PM
5

I was answering a semantic point in a suitable manner. However, I got it from talking with male feminists.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:44 PM
1

Believe it or not, I had similar experiences when I was a casino croupier.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:42 PM
12

Male feminists are seeking privileges for themselves in that they mistakenly think it will allow them a status in the World they could not have by opposing Feminism, ie. they are fighting for the right to be second class citizens rather than mere utilities. It is a bit like the "poetic" rabbits in Watership Down that have learned to "accept fate".
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:33 PM
2

http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php This is for killed by single parent alone. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2043 The above is on the distortion of data produced by having groups dedicated to women's welfare. They do not reveal truth, but actually hide truth for political purposes. If you carry out a web search for female perpetration of child killing you get figures on male perpetration of domestic violence against women prioritised by the search. http://childprotectionresour…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 12:31 PM
1

My post says that NOT ALL mass shooters are men, and that is true. That is ALL I said.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:33 AM
2

It is definitely 80%+ child killings are by women, IPV is close to 50/50, but even 70% of non-reciprocal IPV is female on male. People are not saying , "Is there something about Mothers!", but they are saying "Is there something about Fathers". In the UK Women's groups have deliberately cherry-picked data to precisely insinuate there is something about Fathers. They ignore the majority of cases to do it.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:31 AM
2

I was not trying to prove there was a large number. When it happened is irrelevant. It is the fact that it happened at all, given recent commentary.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:26 AM
22

Actually, it is interesting that a "Mass Shooter" is determined by the number of deaths, rather than by motive or intention of the shooter. The motive seems to be disaffection with life, and the intention was to kill as many as possible. She was prevented by a truck being parked to restrict her line of sight. You mentioned that a handful of female killers of this type can be posited, and so it is clearly not ALL young men, as the media endlessly state. It is also clear that the social conditions…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:42 AM
1

You are full of shit. "Democratically elected dictator" says it all. America now has a 20 Trillion Dollar National Debt and a 14 Trillion Dollar Private Household debt. That fosters the desperate need to maintain the Dollar as the International Currency. Even with all that 20 Million have no health insurance and 50% cannot afford a $1000 emergency. And yet they think they can police everyone else. No one is buying your shit anymore, so spare us the nonsense about how it is Socialism and not US m…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:25 AM
10

The young Ms Spencer was living with a lone Father in poverty. I think he was alcoholic. It is clear there were many "social factors" that could well have contributed to her acting as she did. I think it vital to acknowledge those social factors whoever does the shooting. With the recent male shootings they have been keen to isolate the Y Chromosome from all other context.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:56 AM
1

I am not moping about not being liked. I just think you are a complete twat. My comment about a woman's choice to kill her kid was isolated from the rest of its context by you. I stand by my whole comment, and I think your position is untenable. If America had stayed out of the Middle East it would have been resolved decades ago, but Oil attracts Capital like wasps around a jampot. Human Rights - Interesting concept - The people of Venezuela democratically elect a Government so the USA embargoes…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:50 AM
1

I am pretty sure no one gives a damn if I am murdered or not. Better for you to campaign against US interventionist Wars, that would prove your own moral worth, save the lives of many, and all in a way that would lead to me giving a shit about your opinion.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:23 AM
2

I think describing it as "profoundly mistaken" is better than calling it "disgusting"
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:42 PM
2

I think most women have actually done it too, to the guy they are in a "relationship" with
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:12 PM
1

No, you are wrong. The Pillars of Democracy are Trump and Hilary, both Pillars are erected in a swamp.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 03:05 PM
1

I understand what you are saying, but a woman can change her mind about sexual consent 20 years later - so - Please!
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:36 PM
11

I am not on Instagram at all, but what does it do about, "Oh, yeah, Women are funny all right!"
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:54 PM
6

You can discuss all you like, the woman is allowed to change her mind on a whim. So no man should ever even hope to be with a woman who thinks like he does. It is a road to certain disappointment.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:10 AM
3

We do not support the current situation, we oppose the forced obligation of parenthood on an unwilling man, in the same way parenthood is not forced on an unwilling mother.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:07 AM
6

You are fighting in the wrong place. Let them have "Abortion on Demand". That will mean they choose (1) to have sex or not, (2) who they have sex with, (3) To make him wear a condom or not, (4) To be on the pill or fitted with a device, or not, and all without him having the legal right to know, (5) to take the morning after pill, or not, with him having no right to interfere, (6) to have an abortion or not, with him having no right to interfere, (7) to bare the child and give it up for adoption…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:01 AM
2

According to much Feminist rhetoric that is exactly what women want, so that is good news for everyone all round. With all the "Toxic Masculinity" voluntarily leaving the field open for women to become CEO's of the top 500 companies, we will soon live in a harmonious paradise devoid of strife, wayward temperatures or any form of struggle with Nature.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:36 PM
2

Just avoid relationships with women. There is nothing else to say or discuss.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:23 PM
4

To make the divisive statement that it should be Female-only, is definitely a hint that there would be no National Unity coming from it. She also forgets that many of the white, cis-gendered people that voted to leave the EU, especially those from up North, are women.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:16 PM
1

"Patriarchy" - You need to define your terms. Just what do you mean? Define the term and then demonstrate that "all" previous societies were patriarchal, in the sense that you have defined it. To make any such definition apply to the past it would have to be a definition very different to the modern feminist assertion of the term.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:45 PM
1

True that the terminology is outdated because you can divorce with no grounds, but hands are strengthened and weakened by "grounds" when it comes to legal negotiations, and also pending legal cases so all of this stuff remains important. If you ask her for sex then you are an abusive husband, but if you refuse her sex then you are an abusive husband.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:42 PM
1

Less and less
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:41 PM
3

There was a Men's Rights movement in the Roman Empire from the Time of Nero onwards. There was a men's rights movement in the England of Alfred the Great. The Wittan, was the Star Chamber style Parliament of the time, based on the men of a few top families, but the views of all women had to be considered, there was a separate women's council that met and formed ideas that were then put to the Wittan, and had to be considered with reverence. The rank and file males were completely cut out of all …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:20 PM
6

I do not think this is anything new. Men's rights has always been demonised, whenever it has become prominent, throughout history. I think it becomes more noticeable at times of very high worker suppression, what we now call "neoliberal" doctrine, because the ability to earn a living is undermined, and so much wealth accrues to the top 5% males that all others are rendered revolutionary or die.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:11 PM
36

I agree that sex is not owed, but if he goes elsewhere why is it grounds for divorce. If he withdraws money it is grounds for divorce, if she withdraws sex then why is it not the same, grounds for divorce, and because the fault was with her, for sexual withdrawal, then he should not have to pay anything other than half the childcare costs. You have to remember, a man not having sex with his wife is considered withdrawal of affection and is grounds for her to divorce him.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:00 PM
17

It is exactly the same from the Right. Believe in this! Always do that! Love your God! Serve your Country! Work Hard! Be a man, Not just any man, but a REAL Man, and then, when you have had enough, we will piss on you and throw you away because I am not paying a penny in tax to help a worthless shit like you!
/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:41 PM
4

Really, Mr Obama! I thought women did everything better than men, twice as fast and in heels!
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:27 AM
3

It is the usual story, if men fail it is because they are intrinsically sad, bad, worthless or inadequate (it is a fault within the very structure of male bodies and masculine approach), but if women fail it is because some external disease affected them from without, and blighted the very essence of intrinsic perfection that they all are just by being born.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:24 AM
4

I do not think it is normal behaviour for women, but it is far more common than the modern paradigm would admit to, and it is more common for women to act like this than men. William Collins, The Illustrated Empathy Gap, detailed how 19 cases of child homicide were selected by Women's Groups to illustrate the need to keep children away from Fathers. All 19 cases were of murderous fathers, and they ignored the many many more cases of murderous mothers. I think it bad if we overstate our case agai…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:38 PM
1

Personally, I think this is a joke. Actually, looking on the bright side, if that was the contract you were handed on the day you first asked her out, you could walk away and save yourself a lot of time, money and effort. Funny how some advocate for a written agreement of sexual activity, but do not advocate for rules being set in a written way before a first date. They also want pre-nups invalidated or ignored at divorce time.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:30 PM
10

Yep. That is the way men have been controlled throughout history, and I do not mean the consensual stuff.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:23 PM
1

I think 5 of them were in their early 30's, but I take your point.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:20 PM
1

All advertisements are aimed at a female audience. Even if the money comes from a Man's wallet, the actual decision about what to buy will be made by a woman. It is also known that if there is no woman involved the wallet will stay closed and nothing will be spent at all, and too much of that will mark the end of modern consumerist-capitalist culture.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 02:54 PM
6

Another article published to hide the fact that Men have already dropped out. Men do not want 14 hour days so as to end the month giving all to the wife. Companies are keen for women to take up the slack. Women and Corporations working together to... what?... Nothing really... ...Who cares anymore, anyway?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 02:43 PM
8

The story suggest that her husband was just as bad. Booze and drugs as a mind-numbing escape from reality is always bad news. The end result of the stale, sterility of consumerist culture.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 02:34 PM
11

It never ceases to amaze me.... "Let's talk together, with everyone except young men, about why young men are angry. Then we can tell them why they are angry, and why their anger is illegitimate, because it is clear that we know, better than young men, what they are thinking and why they are thinking it." The pig ignorant arrogance of people amazes me. Throughout all of history, "Young Men" have always been seen as a "problem"... The problem of Youth, blah, blah, blah. No one ever considers the …
/r/MensRights04/08/19 02:02 AM
6

So - No reason at all, seeing as 90% of the people she will sit next to in her life will be "random". Why not say that you do not want her harmed by anyone, but that sitting next to someone for 14 hours is less harmful than meeting someone she knows in a bad mood.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:53 AM
4

Why not?
/r/MensRights03/08/19 09:40 PM
1

I think it might not be true, but, if you read it, it does not say she got pregnant by him, it just says she got pregnant, and he "did the right thing".
/r/MensRights03/08/19 05:11 PM
2

They can call it "fighting sexism" if they want to, but everyone can see that it is the usual female pastime of getting money out of men with as little effort as possible.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:23 AM
2

P&G will try and brave it out. They know that 80% of domestic purchases are made by women, and so they guess they can ride it out. I hope they have miscalculated. If we can bring down a corporate giant then there really is hope for our Sons' futures.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:18 PM
3

I wish men would stay away from dating apps. Treat the whole dating industry with the absolute contempt it deserves.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:13 PM
1

Must expand beyond mere Gillette to other Proctor & Gamble products. I had to give up Head & Shoulders, but... I am worth it!.... Or have I got the wrong product range?
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:55 PM
0

The ratio of men to women can, theoretically be misleading. If 1 woman kills herself and 2 men, then that is a ratio of 2 men for every woman - SHOCK HORROR!... Actually it is just 3 people in total. - So you need an absolute number as well as a ratio to get a clear idea. I say this because there are other gender figures that get quoted, like, Men are 3 times as violent as women! Superficially this is true, but this figure only refers to violence outside of a domestic situation (where women are …
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:34 PM
4

Really! Then why did John Stuart Mill argue that there was such a thing as a Tyranny of the Few over the Many? The problem with a Plutocracy is that a few Rich people tyranise the majority. However, the article has 21 signs that you ARE A MISANDRIST... and 21 is "to say a minority cannot systematically oppress a majority." In other words, if you think a minority cannot systematically oppress a majority (like reverse racism) then you ARE a misandrist. So - yes - I agree with what the caption says
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:25 PM
5

Irish faces
/r/MensRights01/08/19 09:36 PM
1

Graham Hancock keeps promising us a comet strike, but it never happens when you really need it!
/r/MensRights31/07/19 04:52 PM
2

I hate articles that talk of a national statistically significant crisis, and then engage in anecdote with women who knew them. It is actually a diversion from reality pretending to deal with reality.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 04:39 PM
2

Interesting - This is an article against the "Mike Pence Rule". However, it misses the point of the Mike Pence Rule. It is adopted by many people, not because of aversion to "non-pure" sexuality, but as a way of avoiding False Allegations from weaponised-gynocentrism. You Tuber, John the Other, did a video about a similar mistake made in an article that he saw. It seems that there is a policy across the English-Speaking-World to insinuate that "Mike Pence Rule" is about men trying to control urg…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 07:05 AM
1

They will not win in Four years time, the speed at which the gap has closed was very much on display this last World Cup.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:51 AM
1

All the advertisements are aimed at women, and so anything women say will be responded to positively by the "App" owners, or else the advertisers will leave and revenue will be lost. The only power men have is to douse the fire, and the only way to put out a fire is to deprive it of fuel and oxygen. Consequently it is men that have to leave.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:46 AM
0

More whining about Social Media when all you should do is leave.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 05:55 AM
1

Why do men whine about Facebook rather than leave it?
/r/MensRights31/07/19 05:54 AM
5

They are not interested in diagnosing men as anything but "toxic", a decision that was made before most of us were even born.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 05:49 AM
2

Actually, there is evidence that you need 20% of men to sustain a population, but what would women say if men advocated for a society where there were 5 girls for every boy? They could try to keep us in cages like cows, but who would build the cages, and who would build the cowshed?
/r/MensRights31/07/19 05:44 AM
1

That is exactly what I said. Promote the evidence for our cause, and not mention their posts at all. People listen to them because of evolutionary ingrained gynocentrism, and nothing can be done to stop that. If we respond to their posts directly then they have won, because any response to a feminist post, in a gynocentric world, is, by definition, Misogyny. Modern technologically advanced life takes the struggle from life which enables gynocentrism to be weaponised into a political tool. Weapon…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 12:07 AM
2

Personally, I think that posting nonsense that Feminists say is counter-productive for Men's Rights. It is best to promote Men's Rights and leave the Feminists to blah, blah, blah, as they see fit. Giving them attention is what women's groups most crave, so the best tactic against them is to never mention Feminism and Feminists, but merely state the evidence that backs our claims. By ignoring them we deprive them of attention, which will piss them off more than anything we can actually say, and …
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:46 PM
1

The whole economy is collapsing. The Elite talk of how the UK is a "Modern Consumer Economy", which is all fine and dandy, but it is dependent upon having a steady stream of consumers. The trouble is that with wages low and falling no one has enough money to be a consumer, which means no one can buy anything so prices have to fall. To make a profit with falling prices they have to lower wages again... It is a downward spiral. I am married to a Filipina, and so am always watching the exchange rat…
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:15 PM
6

I think you are right, Sir! When I contemplate the blueness of her blood, and the vagueness of her principles, I truly understand the desire she foments within me to... Swipe Left.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:50 AM
10

The British workforce have not had a pay rise in real terms since 1973. They have had relative pay cuts from 1980 onwards, with a massive 10% pay cut over the period 2008-2019. Despite a payrise in April 2019, the overall effects of the last two years have been to cut living standards for working people by 0.5% a year. Rather than train the British workforce to do the work that needs doing, the corporations and the Government would prefer to buy in people from abroad because it is cheaper to do …
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:31 AM
22

It is all beside the point, though surely, because none of us are arguing for female mutilation. The point is that the United Nations has outlawed all FGM, period. No religion, no social custom can be used - the female body must not be cut in any way. Whether certain procedures are better or worse is completely missing the point, which is that all human genital mutilation should be stopped. It is weird that the feminist above wants to hold a pissing competition on the matter.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 01:30 AM
1

I want to know how the pay of the Top 1000 men in the country stretches the mean male salary upwards. I am sick to death of measure after measure to address any problem there might be (not that I am saying there is), but always in the wrong place. I genuinely do not believe there is any ethical justification for a few captains of industry, a few sports stars, and a few TV stars to rake in hideously high salaries, especially when the infrastructure that maintains the society they succeed in, is p…
/r/MensRights29/07/19 01:21 AM
3

Well, there's another bill for her father or brother to pay.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 08:16 PM
1

Below are a few lines from TS Eliot's, The Waste Land, published in 1922. What does this have to do with the theme of the thread, some may ask. Well, hyacinths are flowers used extensively in the French perfume industry. Production was disrupted during the 1914-18 war because the fields were being used for matters other than cultivation. After the War, the hyacinth crops of 1920 and 1921 were the best ever recorded. People spoke with black humour to say that the flowers were feeding well on the …
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:36 AM
0

Batcaves are full of batshit
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:32 PM
2

He clearly has a guy in his head watching him and criticising, but he also has someone aware of the fact that there is someone in his head watching him and criticising.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:12 PM
4

He wrote it in the late 1890's, but became associated with a eulogy for his son, who died in the First World War. He wanted to say all the things to him that he failed to say to him while he was alive. His son went to war, with desperately poor eyesight, because Kipling was a major campaigner for male disposability on behalf of Empire. After he lost his son, and slowly came to terms with the fact that no one cared for any of the lost boys of that generation, Kipling changed his mind, and it led …
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:47 PM
1

Moral norm v the Greater Good? I am really not sure what is being talked about here?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 12:06 PM
7

What dirty jobs! There is no such thing as a dirty job. All those men in holes in the road are there to block my normal route to work, nothing else. There are no underground cables and pipes, (except possibly under the Sphinx),. The only jobs out there are the ones that women do, and the one's that are for chairman of the board, and other paid more than I am sort of positions. I promise you there are no other jobs... I have looked!
/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:13 AM
18

Done
/r/MensRights26/07/19 03:17 AM
1

This will all be blamed on the guy she was having an affair with.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:31 PM
8

It is interesting that the Judge said the woman was old enough to be "responsible", and that is was hard to believe anyone could do such a thing for such a long time and not know what she was doing. It was an adult woman with a 17 year old boy. I bet Asia Argento prays she does not get such a judge.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:28 PM
2

She is not really a feminist at all. She is an inert mind that cannot be bothered to get out of the comfy cushioned easy chair of the modern paradigm.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:45 AM
7

Originally "Rights" were privileges a person was granted to enable them to meet their legal obligations. For instance - If you had a responsibility to pay certain fees to the Authorities, then you had a right to paid employment before a person with no such responsibility. That example is just illustrative. In former times men were often obligated to meet Government or Overlord stipulated targets. Women were not subject to such obligations and responsibilities. Men were answerable in Law for thei…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:05 AM
1

I do not believe for One minute that there is a genuine market among men, of any stripe, to wear "Boys Rule" T-Shirts. Lynching has nothing to do with it. Guys have better things to do.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 10:04 AM
7

I think context is important, and so would like to know what he was told to "Man up" about. Despite that, it is still wrong to make such a comment in a modern work environment. Telling a man to man up is similar to telling a woman to "not bother her pretty little head about it, and go make us all a nice cup of coffee...". Later on, when a guy jumps off the top of a building following such comments, they will forget they told him to Man up and say it was all because he refused to talk about his p…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 12:26 AM
2

What percentage was private 100 years ago, then 50 years ago. The plan is to expand the project because they see a "market" here... It is definitely the nasty corporations going forward. Yes, you are right, the prisons are still mainly publicly run, but in the UK certain prisons have outside corporations sponsoring them in return for having the inmates work in their businesses; they have concession spaces inside prisons, a bit like certain clothing lines are sold within the rented space of a maj…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:59 PM
8

The original tweet was an echo chamber tweet; something the compiler puts out to receive applause and attention, a tweet not produced by any compelling response to an issue or through any genuine engagement with the evidence for the phenomenon. Whether posted by a male or a female I think the original tweet is generated by feminine insecurity on a social validation quest.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 07:39 PM
1

Exactly. Prisons in America are Private enterprises. In order to be profitable they have to have a steady supply of inmates. If men continue to go MGTOW and walk away from family life then it is clear those men will not need such large pay packets to get through life. This means men will not do overtime - things will get more and more like modern Japan as the work ethic dies - and so other means of maintaining the infrastructure will be needed. Consequently it is a Capitalist win-win to get wome…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 06:57 PM
5

As Reagan and Thatcher said, "There is no such thing as society". Given that statement of the position, I think they borrowed it from Hayek, it would be much better if they did not bother working at all, let alone in 100F.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 06:52 PM
1

Netflix, like most media outlets, know that women are the demographic that insist on subscribing to Netflix (whichever pocket the subscription money actually comes from). Advertisers know that it is women that decide what products are bought. So advertisers insist that their adverts are seen by people most likely to respond to the advert, and that means tailoring the sponsored programmes to meet the desires of the target female demographic. It is also understood that women are the major purchase…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 05:58 PM
1

Exactly - The average libertarian would say that if there was a market for it then you would be able to find it. There is no market for it, so, like you say, there is no problem. Long live "Libertarianism", the feminist ideological friend, via gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 05:27 PM
1

Do not have sexual relations with women at all if you can help it, and take the condom off before trying to use a public urinal.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:48 AM
3

Let us hope they send maintainers down to do the maintenance, then, and give the men a break.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:26 AM
2

If there is a market for it, what is the problem?... I think that is what an American style "Libertarian" would say, everything has a price that obscures all discussion of value, yeah? It is made for parody: - "Girls never give up... Smoking"... Whining....Complaining... bitching behind each others backs. "Girls Rule is made of boys centimetres"
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:22 AM
2

It is a shame, but the hat he insists on wearing, in British tradition, is associated with spivs (pedlars of illicit goods in wartime) and fast-talking conmen - the sort of guy that would sell Tower Bridge to a tourist by claiming to be a cousin of the original builder... Nuff said!
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:13 AM
2

Manholes are gender neutral - womanholes or wermanholes would be gender specific.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:10 AM
12

Sorry, but the association of "Stoic" with "Emotionless" is a pile of crap insinuated by the Feminist inspired social and mental health industry. There is a big difference between feeling emotion, and channelling it into productive action, on the one hand, and allowing emotionalism to overwhelm you and take control of you, on the other. ​ Men are not meant to be Emotionless, but are often self taught the value of Stoicism. Never get these things mixed up.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:03 PM
2

My advice is to only hit a woman if you seriously consider yourself to be in genuine danger from her (Obviously guard against sucker blows). The reason I say this is because I am convinced a lot of female violence is to seek attention or provoke a response. If you do not respond then you diminish her significance... and that diminishment is the best victory possible. If you react and retaliate you have lost.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 06:39 PM
2

Working Class White males are under-represented in the Judiciary, in Parliament, and in Senior positions across a wide range of Jobs - therefore no working class white men should be sent to prison.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 07:10 AM
6

Think about it, guys! If he follows a woman up an escalator he will be prosecuted for Upskirting, or maligned in the press for walking while "armed" and prepared to Upskirt. It will also be dismissed from Court because it will be judged as a man walking with intent to be litiginous. Whatever he does will be judged "Wrong!"
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:17 AM
1

Femsplaining - Woman asks man a question - something like, What do you think of....? Man answers question. Woman says, "You don't think what you just said, what you actually think is..." Man tries to restate his original position. Woman insists that man does not think what he says he thinks, what he actually thinks is what she says that he thinks.... and.... he is disgusting for thinking it!
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:34 AM
1

I do not think it is because of what is between a males legs. The average male has more muscle in their thighs, and when you sit down the muscle spreads and pushes the legs apart. The average male sits on a bus or a train oblivious to the world around them, reading books or papers.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:30 AM
2

"because men face problems from patriarchy" Men do not face problems from patriarchy, they face problems from weaponised gynocentrism. Patriarchy is a word that does not correspond with any reality at all. Patriarchy as system designed to favour men at the expense of women does not exist. The original argument was that women were "objectified" by video games. Women suffer less objectification than Men do in life. As I said, men are wholly objectified and thoroughly dehumanised, reduced to utilit…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:19 AM
3

No, I do not see any logic here - Men are expected to be breadwinners, not because of dominance, but because of Gynocentrism and gender dimorphism. Up to the 1960's women were tied to child-bearing and nurturing. It is only the advent of contraception, abortion and the conveniences of modern technological innovations and infrastructure that has enabled women to have a home and a career. Further to that women still seek males that are rich and earn more money than they do, even if they have a car…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:04 AM
1

The suggestion that "Feminism" is multi-faceted I can accept. People can sit in an echo-chamber and argue the toss about this and that. For practical purposes Feminism is not what it talks about, Feminism is what it does in the World. The essential driving force of Feminism in action is to endlessly state that the history of all societies is a tale of the endless drive of men to make War on Women and keep them in subjection. To this end Feminist lie about the reality of Domestic violence, they l…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:20 AM
3

Feminism is disproved by the true surveys of domestic violence that shows women are marginally more violent than men overall in their domestic relationships, and that One third of deaths are of Men in DV. Over 80% of children killed are killed by women, but the feminist movement deliberately cherry picks only cases of Male killing to present to Parliament to review Child Custody arrangements. This all shows that the feminist position that Men are always perpetrators and only perpetrators is a li…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:54 PM
6

Objectification? Men must make money, men are mere objects of utility that have to be useful to women, Employers and the State. When not in use they are stored in the basement, the garage or the attic, just like all the other appliances. There is no evidence to support the contention that game design causes the objectification of women. There is no evidence that pornography leads to objectification of women or to violence against women. The feminist movement has talking points and no evidence to…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:34 PM
3

Gender roles are not the source of the problem. The source of the problem is weaponised gynocentrism and misandry.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:30 PM
1

The purpose of such public sports is to entertain, and much of the women's world cup was very entertaining, except for the Germans, but no worse than the men on that score. I think the salaries paid to many of the male players is as ridiculous as it is long term unsustainable. The vicious franchising of sport is aimed at persecuting the fan base for their loyalty to a game that does not deserve them. The fact that the women can only think of the money too means that there is no great new vision …
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:48 PM
1

"diseases of the brain like depression and suicide" I am uncertain if depression and suicide are diseases of the brain. What do you mean by saying they are? I can understand that brain cancer is a disease of the brain. I can understand that testicular cancer would leave you with depression just as much as brain cancer would. Is it the job of Psychology to cure mental illness, or is that the job of medicine? Or is it psychiatry (maybe the point where psychology and medicine meet)? I guess you wou…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 01:38 AM
1

https://thegrayzone.com/2019/07/06/weaponizing-human-rights-un-high-commissioner-bachelets-venezuela-report-follows-us-regime-change-script/
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:54 AM
0

Like I said, the objection was not to the fact that she was a woman, which is what Morgan said. And, yeah, it was "mocking" by means of stereotype rather than celebrating. As the previous person said, it was around July 4th. Much better to give thanks to the French than mock the English.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:54 AM
3

It was about Men's Rights because Morgan said it was picking on "Women" celebrating. I was pointing out she was not being picked on because she was a woman, I am right about why they rebelled against the Tea Tax, it was because they did not want the British ending Slavery. No taxation without representation, was a desire for representation of slave owners. The later battle for States Rights was to stop the Anti-Slavers of Pennsylvania being allowed to influence other States. Why the Boston Tea P…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:47 AM
1

So what? She does not want customers, fine. Are Muslim men allowed to be tattood by her anyway? What are the religious laws about her touching male skin, or having bare skin brought near to her?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:08 AM
0

The criticism was not for celebrating, but for the style of celebration. Drinking Tea was referencing the Boston Tea Party in a game against England, which implies some form of racist intent in the chosen method of disrespect. The actual truth of the Boston Tea Party is in the Somerset v Stewart Court case in England in 1772. A slave on a ship owned by a Boston merchant wanted his property back on board the ship to sail back to Massechusetts. The slave said he did not want to be a slave anymore.…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:55 PM
2

I wore a Kilt to work once, complete Daywear Outfit (Argyll). My boss told me not to do it again. I asked, why not? I never got an answer.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:59 AM
8

It seems like a back door restatement of the "TRUTH" of "TOXIC MASCULINITY" far more than an article genuinely in praise of short men.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:47 AM
13

Paul Elam wrote a good piece on this sort of nonsense. https://anearformen.com/blog/dr-ronald-levant-says-men-are-emotional-dummies/ ​ Men are just as emotional as women, it is just that men introspectively process their feelings whereas women prefer to be verbal about their emotions. You have to ask, which method of processing is best for maximising positive uses of emotions?
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:39 AM
1

You suggested that pregnant women were not forced to be sensible, but could "drink like a sailor" - I think you are being unfair to sailors, and I would suggest revising the post to say "drink like a family court judge" - I think such a change would remove any hint of contraversy from your post. :)
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:21 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f5v1QgtFfo ​ Good to watch for something more up to date.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 08:10 AM
7

I think your use of the term "Justify" is not good in your last sentence. There is a big difference between observing and documenting a phenomenon, and then trying to explain it - on the one hand, and then justifying what you have observed and explained. Although it is true that we do not live in the Stone Age anymore, our body and our hormones still work in that way. The recognition of all the features that make-up Gynocentrism is very important, as part of a campaign to get the needs of men re…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:04 PM
1

At least they need to leave the doughnuts alone. If women eat all the pies, what do their kids get?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:38 AM
1

I agree that it is disgusting that Sport and Media Stars get this sort of money for doing nothing very important. Could you sell $84 million of tickets to watch a surgeon cut out cancer, or for any of the silent army of people that maintain the National Infrastructure and Communication systems that allow people to attend games and notice people like Messi. It is a hideous distortion of life to reduce all humanity to a cash generation model, and active steps need to be taken to change this shabby…
/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:12 AM
1

The plan is to prevent the use of increments for time-served, prevent shift allowances for working the graveyard shift, prevent raised pay levels for overtime beyond 40 hours a week, prevent raised pay levels for high risk jobs, and to prevent any form of anti-social hours payments. If gender is the only thing that matters, then all other factors can be dismissed as worthless, in the name of gender equality. Feminism is a tool of Authoritarian bosses to deregulate work and dehumanise people.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter