Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]mgtowolf 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Men have stricter dress codes, and are told how to groom their heads and bodies as well. Good luck if you tell maria she has to shave her mustachio like they do to men lol.
[–]actualsize123 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Actually they technically can’t tell a man to take a skirt off.
[–]radelite 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Kilts intensify
[–]TheBaredBodkin 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I wore a Kilt to work once, complete Daywear Outfit (Argyll). My boss told me not to do it again. I asked, why not? I never got an answer.
[–]Bergvagabund 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
OP can use the Swedish bus driver tactic and wear a dress to work.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22828150
[–]xNOM 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Or OP could just wear shorts like a normal man and say "fuck you."
[–]Mightyoak123 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
Khaki shorts are different from smart work skirts. The aim is to look professional, whether you're male or female. If it's super hot I do agree men should have another option but realistically there aren't many smart options that don't look like school uniform from the 1960s. I suggest someone design some but khaki shorts are most definitely casual wear. But I'm from the UK and picturing what we'd call cargo shorts, are they the same?
[–]radelite 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Nah cargo shorts are a bit different. Khaki is like the most business type a pair of shorts can get.
[–]Mightyoak123 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I think we call those chinos? The last 3 places I've worked have had the attitude wear what makes you comfy but dress conservative when you need to. It's been great everyone is more productive when they're wearing what they're comfortable in. It is a double standard though, but as with all issues, it's complex. The answer I believe is the workplace adapting. Don't get women to dress like men, if it doesn't look right on them. Let everyone be more flexible and ensure they have options for all weathers
[–]Mightyoak123 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I think we call those chinos? The last 3 places I've worked have had the attitude wear what makes you comfy but dress conservative when you need to. It's been great everyone is more productive when they're wearing what they're comfortable in. It is a double standard though, but as with all issues, it's complex. The answer I believe is the workplace adapting. Don't get women to dress like men, if it doesn't look right on them. Let everyone be more flexible and ensure they have options for all weathers
[–]Plantdas -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
I'd like to see you wear heels and typical professional women's wear before you start comparing knee length skirts and KHAKI SHORTS.
[–]radelite 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
You into men wearing women’s clothing or sumn?
[–]Plantdas 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Maybe ;)
[–]radelite 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
James Charles wants to know your location
[–]goodmod[M] -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
Although this is a good post, the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible.
If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. Moreover, it means that your post will fail to reach some readers because they won't know what it's about.
So please don't do it in future. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.
When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.
[–]radelite 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Really? For me it shows the title of the linked post just fine without any extra clicking. Is it different on the website version than the app version?
[–]goodmod 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes. There are four different modes for viewing on the website (that I know of). The more compact ones show just a postage stamp image or none at all.
Then there are probably different viewing modes on the official app. And at least two other apps with different viewing modes.
You can't rely on the crosspost title or the image to show up to every viewer. That's why the mods encourage clear and descriptive titles for every post.
Descriptive titles also mean the post can show up in relevant searches, so overall there are good reasons to have them - even if they're not as witty as they might otherwise be.
[–]radelite 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Alright i’ll keep that in mind. My fault for barely using the actual website version lol.