TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheCenterHolds Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by TheCenterHolds on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We would use that exact same logic (i.e. female "victim" rejects entirely and enthusiastically that a crime was committed, therefore male "perpetrator" will not be charged with a crime) if the circumstances were the same as they were in this case. That isn't even debatable. Refer to my previous posts. Once again, situations like this are exceptional, and I've described it as such. Although unconsciousness isn't often in the mix (but can be), partners often have drunk consensual sex (with consent…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:30 AM
1

I'm not even going to respond to this allegation of "feminist bigotry." Since you're not making much sense and failing to engage with what I've written, here is a simplified version of my problem with your position: He doesn't call it rape. He calls it a consensual sex act. He wants to go about his life with his girlfriend. You say that he was victimized and that his girlfriend should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Why?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:27 AM
1

I describe that scenario to point out the absurdity of your apparent position, not because it has any basis in reality or would be the inverse of this situation. A case where the roles were perfectly reversed would result in an identical outcome, and you can't show me a single case where it didn't (because the woman, like our "victim" here, wouldn't have pressed a charge of rape, and the State can neither press a charge of rape for her nor force her to press one). Well, I've got enough empathy t…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:53 AM
1

He didn't have "willpower" while he was incapacitated, nor does anyone else. I never once said that. What I have said (and maintained consistently) is that he had it before and after, and it is his right in this country not to press a felony charge against a woman he sincerely believes did him no wrong. You talk about human rights, but you'd like to force this man to send his girlfriend to prison because you believe he was violated? I have never in my life heard of a case where a woman enthusias…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:43 AM
1

No, I'm asking you why you're telling a man who "wants to clear his girlfriend's name" that he was the victim of rape and that he should report his girlfriend to the police and media as his rapist. I know people on this sub aren't noted for their critical reading acumen, but did you even read anything I wrote back to you? Why is it that you selectively disregard the unambiguous evidence that renders your position absurd, the "victim's" own understanding of what you're insisting was rape?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:32 AM
1

Was this man violated against his will?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:12 AM
1

Those broadly written state laws exist to protect individuals from sexual violence while they are incapacitated or unconscious; they are not blanket moral (or legal) pronouncements that a human being must believe and report himself or herself a victim of that crime if consensual sex with a trusted partner involves circumstances (e.g. sleep or drunkenness) that technically constitute rape per a state law. This man will obviously not press charges, and I cannot for the life of me understand why yo…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:02 AM
1

That's a single, idiosyncratic example, and I can't find any information on this company beyond this article. Assuming that this happened as Brick described it, it's worth remembering that new business ventures fail routinely; the fact that this all-female organization failed is in no way conclusive proof that companies with a higher percentage of female employees are any more likely to fail. Do you have any other evidence at all?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:00 AM
2

She committed no such crime. Her boyfriend specifically indicated that he had consented enthusiastically but had passed out from drunkenness at some point during their consensual encounter.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:21 PM
2

Brock Turner was found guilty of the following crimes: 1. Assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person 2. Penetration of an intoxicated person 3. Penetration of an unconscious person If you object to his being called a "rapist," would you prefer that we call him a convicted "attempted rapist" or a convicted "sexual penetrator?"
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:54 PM
0

To be fair, a grand jury returned a "no bill,' and, barring malfeasance or procedural error, the judge had no role at all in shaping their decision. There'd be no clear reason to shoot flak his way even if this case were highly publicized. Given the facts available to us, I'm baffled by the grand jury's decision (which says, in effect, that there wasn't a shred of credible evidence that a crime took place). That said, although the genders are reversed here, this kind of outcome is hardly rare wh…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:40 PM
3

Her boyfriend specifically indicates that he consented to it and had no desire to press charges. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW8eZr-It9E
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:23 PM
2

Get out of here with your rational critique and scream incoherently like a true man should.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:13 PM
1

Im not having a go at you specifically btw. to if you are going to such a fucking moron, and make a false argument then consider this conversation closed. you are simply an idiot. I love your work on Youtube
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:34 PM
1

The year is 2049, world governments as we know them have dissolved or collapsed during near constant food riots, armed coups, and finally nuclear exchanges. I see a man forcing himself sexually on a girl and shoot him on sight. Members of my tribe sprint to my side, guns drawn, and breathlessly ask me why I fired; I gesture to the cowering woman who has pulled herself from under her attacker's body (a crude tattoo on his body identifies him as a low-ranking slaver and reads: "Asshopper2100." "Ra…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:20 PM
0

prosecuted. It's not non-sequitur, you piece of trash. "No statistical meaning." Is that even English? It's a case in point about your ignorance. You think that the system works yet don't care that it literally failed to process evidence for thousands of cases. It's proof that the system is currently profoundly broken and incapable of responding effectively to the crime of rape.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:20 AM
-1

You're describing a justice system that does not currently exist, and you continue to ignore my point regarding unprocessed rape kits. I won't waste my time linking data; they are abundant and easily searchable. I wasn't referring to myself, but to FlyingBurritoBrother. I only posted after seeing you systematically disregard (conveniently) anything that might complicate your naive, willfully ignorant (given that you're clearly an intelligent person) stance on rape prosecution in this country. Yo…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:29 AM
-1

Did I quote you? I summarized your beliefs. Do you not think there's some sort of epidemic of false reporting? Do you not think that there's no real problem with rape prosecution in our country? I will quote you here: "I also do not think we have a nation wide problem dealing with rape or efficiently and compassionately dealing with real victims." That says it all. You are profoundly ignorant and speaking of things you have no knowledge of at all. Do you know how many thousands of unprocessed ra…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:07 AM
-1

You have consistently dismissed the testimony of women as being less than credible and described policies designed to allow women (and men) to report safely and to a sympathetic audience as unjust. That comment was rhetorical, designed to mock the way you express yourself, not to indicate that you believe every single woman in the world is a liar. You don't deserve intellectual charity because you've already renounced the use of reason here and taken to a maddening counter-offensive against some…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:52 AM
-1

Some light reading for you (all from liars of course): http://aplus.com/a/sexual-abuse-violence-survivors-fight-back-project-unbreakable?c=5801&utm_campaign=i102&utm_source=a2527
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:15 PM
-3

Hey Coach, For someone concerned with "equal rights for all" you seem to spend an inordinate amount of time arguing for why rape victims who weren't brutally beaten with a club and raped in an alley should be treated, categorically, as "liars until proven honest" by our legal system. Let's imagine a scenario involving you, an upstanding, morally righteous, Judeo-Christian white male with a well-respected name and a. What if you were to walk into a police station to report that your wallet has be…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter