TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheGreatConst Archive

View 5 posts and 756 comments by TheGreatConst on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

There are no objective 9s and 10s and when it comes to looks alone an ordinary college girl can be 9/10 for most guys. Just because a girl is hot doesn't mean that she is of high social status, you should be delusional to think otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/20 06:28 PM
8

And guys who say that they get laid thanks to their handsome face do have proofs? No one is going to prove anything on the internet, why the hell this shit got upvotes, lol. If you never met average or below average dudes who fuck hotties then you need to get to know more people.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/20 06:26 PM
2

" If you are an incel like the above example person, you might say that women want the most attractive male possible to satisfy some evolutionary need." What it has to do with incels? This statement is an objective fact. Humans are animals programmed by evolution. What incels and black pilled guys get wrong is that your appearance is just a small part of your genetic value. Women don't need just someone with good health (this is indicated by your appearance), rather they need someone who is good…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/20 06:23 PM
2

Lol, dude. It is women's work to make sure that you wouldn't leave them, not the other way around.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/20 08:39 AM
2

You need to start getting out more then. In clubs the time from the first meeting to the first kiss is often about ten minutes, sometimes it is less than one minute.
/r/seduction02/08/20 12:58 PM
-2

Actually, in modern society, the police are exactly the ones who protect us. I would want to see a "good man" going against armed gangs. And in most countries that aren't the USA harming someone in self-defense even can get you in trouble with the law. If you seriously think that random dudes protect you instead of police then I would question your IQ. A good person maybe saves someone once or twice in their whole life, a policeman does it weekly, but no one cares because "how dare they kill the…
/r/MensRights01/08/20 07:33 AM
10

You are right, but you are also wrong. You are right that most guys come from a wrong, very weak mindset. You are wrong that the only way to get the right mindset is to become MGTOW and wait that the girls will appear on their own. For many guys living amazing life is about being a nerd and having hobbies that aren't socially regarded as high value. Trying to find high-value hobbies just to get girls is even more pathetic than trying to get them with tricks. There are many guys objectively succe…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/20 06:08 AM
1

And I know some not good looking men with no success in life other than fucking women. It is especially the case for guys who are close to a criminal lifestyle. They are objectively losers, but they just don't put women on a pedestal and it gets them laid more than average.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/20 04:03 PM
4

But again, it doesn't mean she will wanna fuck the ugly guy just because he's more manly. Everyone has standards and that's normal. Actually, it does mean exactly that. I'm rather "ugly" by conventional standards (below average height, can't get big even after training in a gym, bad teeth, shitty facial hair, etc) and I fuck 8/10+ girls regularly. The frame is everything, how you treat YOURSELF is the most important thing ever. Women have no "standards" when it comes to looks, they are different…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/20 03:50 PM
1

Using violence to penetrate. Though idk, if she used strapon, then by my countries definition it would be rape as well. Anyway, there is no differece legally because the punishment is the same for rape and for forced sexual act.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 02:44 AM
2

As long as you think in terms of "making someone like you, giving them a reason" you'll never truly succeed with girls. The reason why those guys get laid so much is that they value themselves more than they value girls. People don't want to date their equals, they want to date those they consider above them. Unattractive guys don't want to date unattractive girls, they still want a model. And a model-looking girl wants a guy who will she consider as better than her. And girls decide if you are …
/r/seduction29/07/20 02:42 AM
3

If you are feeling rejected by a girl it means you are doing something wrong. The same goes for being a good salesman. When you are confident in your product you aren't getting rejected, it is the other person who lost the opportunity to get your amazing product at discounted price.
/r/seduction28/07/20 06:07 PM
-7

Some of the best "naturals" I know who are extremely good with girls are sexists to some extent (well, by your definition anyway). It doesn't hurt your chances with the girls at all unless you are hating women. Moreover, everything he said is a fact when it comes to generalization. When it comes to sexual courting women are illogical and emotional, it doesn't stop them from being able to become scientists though. But when they are choosing whom to bang they are definitely like this. And them bei…
/r/seduction28/07/20 06:04 PM
22

Depending on a country and definition rape can be something very specific, like forceful penetration. For example, in my country, blackmailing a girl into sex wouldn't be considered as "rape", instead it would be a "forceful sexual act". And rape is a definition exclusive only for using violence to penetrate someone.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:49 PM
1

What is this doing here? Sorry, but this is not abuse, just plain disrespect.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 02:22 PM
2

If you feel that you are rejected, then you are doing something wrong. You should never come from the mentality of asking a girl for anything, instead, you are sharing your value with her as a high-value man and she should work for it. She either will make efforts to get it or not. Either way, you are never rejected, it is she who loses the opportunity. IDK how it got 96% upvotes, even here most guys are still in chasing mentality. You are giving her a chance, an opportunity, how the hell she ca…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/20 03:20 AM
4

Nah, it wouldn't matter much. Being boring outside of spitting the game has nothing to do with passions, hobbies, or education and has everything to do with how you treat the girl and how much you cling to validation from "dating a hot girl". If you feel that your personal value is directly related to dating her, then you'll feel insecure and would be unable to show your true personality (saying whatever you want, whatever you consider funny and interesting even if other people can think it is s…
/r/seduction28/07/20 03:14 AM
8

Even after all those years of pickup your writing still stinks of scarcity and putting women above you. " Don’t let her know how insecure you are, dammit. " There is a difference between insecurity and boundaries. If she touches other dude's biceps and you don't like it - tell her. If she does it anyway, or try to argue - she doesn't respect you and not afraid of losing you. Just go flirt to other girls right before her eyes. Anyway, this already means that she isn't LTR material, there is no re…
/r/seduction28/07/20 03:10 AM
2

I wanted to upvote you until I noticed that you are still coming from the scarcity mindset. You don't need to try and make her "notice that you are oh so cool and different" by being scarce. Just perceive yourself as scarce, as you said in the post's title. There are many girls and the only one you. You don't need anything to "work", it is she who loses you if it "didn't work", not the other way around. It is she who should think about how to make you more interested and impressed with her. Your…
/r/seduction23/07/20 01:26 PM
2

If the genders were reversed and you posted it in any other sub people would tell you that it is sexual harassment, lol.
/r/seduction23/07/20 01:20 PM
29

The key reason behind approach anxiety is your desire to "be cool" and to "get nice reactions". You are there to impress a girl, to show her how cool you are by saying cool shit. But if she isn't reacting well you would be like "omg, I'm not cool, what to do"? This is what creates this approach anxiety on a fundamental level and that ruins frame and game for most guys. By trying to impress girls, by trying to be cool, to be alpha, you automatically put girls above you. And then you work on climb…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/20 09:54 AM
0

"They are bad so we should be bad too" isn't an argument, you see.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 09:00 AM
42

Stop trying to impress women with how good your game is, then you will no longer care if the things you say are clever or not, let alone "flawless". The best game is when you don't try to impress women or to maintain an image of a cool guy. I.e. when you DGAF.
/r/seduction23/07/20 05:31 AM
1

If there are at least 100 000 people in his town it is still enough. If it is a 10 000 town then he should go the fuck away from there.
/r/seduction23/07/20 05:30 AM
3

Of course, you can. Because you HAVE an abundance. You can approach as many women as you want. Abundance isn't about already having a gf or two, it is about having a choice to get to know a new girl whenever you want. Instead of chasing girls - start to choose the ones who you like the best, most likely those would be girls who like you as well, because if a girl likes you, she will make many good things for you - would be receptive, nice, etc. If a girl is hot, but otherwise makes you uncomfort…
/r/seduction23/07/20 05:07 AM
26

" Eventually, Bundy ghosted brooks and he admitted he only rekindled his relationship with Brooks just so he could reject her like she rejected him. Bundy began his murder spree very shortly after." It went from 0 to 100 very fast...
/r/TheRedPill22/07/20 06:37 PM
395

Not "women", but "radical feminists and SJWs". Don't demonize women, most of them aren't bad.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:04 PM
2

I think rape statistics of men on men rape is plain wrong, everyone knows about prison rapes, it is just that it is rarely prosecuted.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:39 AM
85

How about just not putting girls too high in terms of importance to your life? You don't need to be busy to do it, lol.
/r/seduction21/07/20 02:53 AM
9

Lol, correlation doesn't mean casuation. It is obvious that your physical attractiveness is one of the factors, especially considering that most men have zero confidence. There is no study in existence that would prove "the black pill sceince" (i.e. that appearance is the only important factor), it is nonsense. In fact, most studies I've seen, prove that such factors as dominance and extravertion are more likely to be correlators to the number/quality of a man's sexual partners. I don't give a f…
/r/seduction21/07/20 02:29 AM
90

It is interesting that the most popular comment is the one that proves that OP's post is bullshit. The problem with girls is that, in most cases, they aren't sure that they like you from the start, they need some time to be attracted and to start chasing. More often than not a girl determines if she is interested in you...based on your behavior, lol. If you are confident that she is into you, then she is likely to start thinking like this as well.
/r/seduction20/07/20 05:12 PM
2

Rather than "move on" you just go and find someone who isn't so lame. If a girl is fun to be around, she makes you feel good when you talking to her, then you continue being with her. If she is lame, boring, doesn't flirt and being cold, then you'll need to find someone better.
/r/seduction20/07/20 05:08 PM
2

Dude, experienced "PUA" have statistics of sleeping with 2-3 girls out of 100, at most. Those are guys who TEACH others and think that they are the guru of pickup. Stop listening to typical PUA advice, pls. You can't relax and "just be yourself" because of all the advice you've read. Check my most popular post to get an idea of what you are doing wrong.
/r/seduction20/07/20 07:29 AM
4

Just the fact that you are trying to make a "clever come back" automatically makes you lose. The best defense is offense, but it doesn't mean that you should do the same thing as the other person and start insulting them, it would mean that you accepted their rules instead of setting your own. You can win any "verbal battle" by interpreting whatever the person says in a way convenient for you or just making it absurd. The key here is - never give excuses or explanations, make them do it instead,…
/r/seduction18/07/20 04:24 PM
4

If you are a drug addict who is willing to marry a woman who is well-known for being crazy, then yeah, you aren't safe. To be safe from this shit you should improve yourself so that you could have your fair choice of women AND actually be very choosy with them. Signs of emotional instability and potential for abuse aren't things that can be easily missed after living with a person for a few years.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 05:55 PM
1

You shouldn't be afraid of "being a dick" if a girl is insecure. Because all it needs to "fix" things up is just to give her some approval or a compliment. It is much harder to fix being boring and insecure.
/r/seduction17/07/20 05:46 PM
11

Yeah, right. But if you really implement it on a deeper level, then 99% of the game would be useless, because, in the end, it is just an attempt to manipulate a girl into liking you. Who is thinking about all those strategies to be approved and liked - you or the girl? And who is the prize then?
/r/seduction17/07/20 04:52 PM
1

Who cares? You can be as harsh as you want as long as you are being playful and not treating it too seriously. If her reaction is too intense, it is a good sign, it means she values your evaluation a lot and tries to impress you, afraid to look silly in your eyes, etc. At the beginning of a conversation, especially if it isn't in socially acceptable circumstances (like daygame), negative reactions aren't bad, they allow you to show that your frame is stronger and that it is she who is strange fo…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/20 04:35 PM
1

You didn't read the second part of my comment?
/r/TheRedPill17/07/20 04:23 PM
5

Sorry, but negging isn't "dumb" it is probably one of the few "outer game" techniques that actually work. If you think that a neg is "passive-aggressive insult" then you are right though, it is dumb. The right neg is just a teasing remark, or a double-edged compliment, nothing serious. Instead “Your clothes don’t match. Should have worn brown shoes.” it would be "Nice clothes, are they second-hand?" You aren't trying to insult the girl, you are just having fun, don't be serious when you say anyt…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/20 11:46 AM
1

I don't believe in "you're her physical type" shit. There are multiple studies that prove that your appearance doesn't influence a girl's excitement at all. I've seen fat short dudes bang hotties and I'm myself far from being tall or handsome. It doesn't matter. You can't understand one simple fact - caring about what a girl thinks is useless. Her reactions don't matter, you should be the one leading the whole interaction, her frame doesn't matter, only yours does. I can see that you are someone…
/r/seduction16/07/20 04:59 PM
1

Yeah and then my opinion is that a man having a mustache is bad for the children. It is opinion, so I don't need to prove it no matter how absurd it is, right? Also, poly isn't equal to swinging.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 06:47 AM
2

Do you understand that it is something you need to prove, right? For now it is just an assumption not based on anything, not even on logic. It is as abstract as "because god said so". And nope, you shouldn't sacrifice your own happiness and satisfaction for the sake of children. It is the direct road to shitty family. Both partners should be satisfied sexually and emotionally, only then it is possible for them to raise children properly without any drama and conflicts.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:17 AM
2

Find any other study that will prove your point.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:16 AM
0

Lol, I never try to "convert" girls. I just give value and then watch them chase me. When I'm talking to a girl I don't give a fuck about her reaction, everything I say is cool because I think so. In the end, more often than not, a girl accepts this reality. I don't believe in "I'm not her type" bullshit. As if I care about her type, lol.
/r/seduction16/07/20 02:16 AM
2

Nothing is obvious about it. What it has to do with children?
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:14 AM
3

You are right, but also very wrong. It is one thing to try and convince someone after they rejected you, it is stupid. It is the other thing to actually be your own person and not accepting negative reactions. If you always accepting that women say at face value then congratulations, you don't understand them at all. You can't be "rejected" if you aren't actually chasing women, but instead evaluating them to find those who are worth your time. How can she say "no" if you aren't actually asking h…
/r/seduction15/07/20 06:17 PM
-4

IDK how the hell it can influence the children? How many of you actually know anything about your parents' sexual life? Being swingers doesn't mean being in open relationship or inviting your swing-couple to play with your children. As a kid you'll never know if your parents are swingers, sexless, bisexual or even cheaters.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 03:58 PM
1

I would surprise you, but as long as you are popular enough you can expect any kind of treatment. It is the case both for men and for women. For example, if a woman wants to cheat while her husband stays loyal, she simply can find a guy with cuckold fetish (they aren't as rare as it seems). The problem is - women don't like submissive men and rarely interested in them. It is the other way around for straight dudes. I would totaly prefer a submissive girl who is "putting me on a pedestal" to anyo…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 03:47 PM
6

I have another two rules for you guys: Who cares what she wants? Follow your own desires and have your own standards.
/r/seduction15/07/20 03:40 PM
23

Let's not lower ourselves to body-positive feminist's level, please. You can love your body all you want, but pls don't expect other people to change their tastes for your sake. We are programmed by evolution to be attracted to...well, attractive people.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 03:38 PM
-11

Sorry, but all studies prove that swinging relationships work and work better than ordinary ones. Most men don't want to fuck their wife after 10 years of marriage, and, honestly, the only reason why cheating will hurt for them is that it is a form of disrespect and betrayal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swinging_(sexual_practice)) "60% said that swinging improved their relationship; 1.7% said swinging made their relationship less happy. Approximately 50% of those who rated their relationship "…
/r/MensRights15/07/20 03:31 PM
-30

Do you know that they did have an open marriage, right? Will definitely banged other girls, don't treat him like a little bitch, he isn't Elon.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 03:22 PM
4

I guess you missed some fundamentals of TRP. Men and women aren't the same, so obviously there would be "double standards". Well, there are women who "expect low counts". Those who want to find a convenient man to provide for their children.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 02:56 PM
5

Your advice is good, but it is just curing symptoms, not the illness itself. Doing all of this wouldn't make you less needy, it would just hide this neediness from a girl. You wouldn't need to think about all of this if you were actually non-needy on a fundamental level. Your advice is about how to not appear needy instead of how to stop being needy. The problem is - you wouldn't be able to keep all of this in your head and trying to do it will make a guy even more anxious. In the end, neediness…
/r/seduction15/07/20 05:25 AM
2

Surprise, but men and women aren't equal. Because women are gatekeepers of sex and men are gatekeepers of commitment. So as a guy there is nothing strange in having many lay counts, it doesn't kill your ability to "pair bond" and even if it did, it is a woman's work to make you want a relationship with her. For gay dudes it doesn't matter at all though, as you can't have kids anyway, you don't need to care about bodycount as long as you use protection and isn't afraid of HIV.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 05:21 AM
0

Well, anyone with body count above 30 would tell you that this is bullshit. The chance of catching any dangerous STD is almost inexistent if you use condoms right. The problem is - many idiots who hookup in clubs are too drunk and stupid to do it, so here you go with "the danger of STDs". Other guys then bareback their club thot gf and cry about STDs. ​ I know guys with triple-digit lay count and they didn't get any STDs other than "basic package" HPV which already infected most of humanity and …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 05:15 AM
4

Yeah, right. As long as she doesn't have any terrible STDs and you aren't planning to have kids together, it is all about her making efforts to be the best for you and fulfilling your wishes.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 04:59 AM
1

" Lets assume she started fucking at 18 (lol), that's like 6 guys a year for 3 years. " Lol, good luck trying to find an 18 y.o. virgin who isn't completely ugly. She probably started to have sex when she was 15-16. It means 5-6 years of sexual activity, about 3-4 guys per year. Still a lot, but there are girls out there who get this bodycount in a few months. If even guys can bang 10 girls per month if they are attractive enough when that about hot girls? They can fuck only 9-10/10 guys and sti…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 04:56 AM
1

Not really, often a girl would be already DTF after she chose you among hundreds of other guys from Tinder.
/r/seduction15/07/20 04:47 AM
4

Lol, are you serious? Photos. Check my reply to this post. Game and confidence are 90% of success in real life, but they don't translate through Tinder. In fact, you wouldn't even be able to contact girls unless they swipe on your photo.
/r/seduction14/07/20 07:06 PM
5

Yeah, right. But on Tinder, your game and confidence don't matter much.
/r/seduction14/07/20 06:23 PM
4

The only thing you need to know about success on Tinder: Good photos. Objectively good photos. To determine the good photos use photofeeler, I didn't find any similar app. The most shocking thing to me while testing this app was the fact that a model-looking guy can be rated 3,5/10 while an average-looking guy can get 9/10 with the right photos. For women context of the photo, quality and your non-verbals are more important. Check this. https://blog.photofeeler.com/take-attractive-online-dating-…
/r/seduction14/07/20 06:22 PM
0

Let's be honest here. The age of consent is completely arbitrary. In some countries, 14 y.o. can legally fuck 24 y.o. and no one getting "hurt" from that. In other countries, the age of consent is 21. So 22 y.o. can't have sex with 20 y.o. legally. And if they do, I'm sure that many people from those countries would tell how this predatory 22 y.o. "raping a child", lol. I wouldn't be surprised if one day there would be countries where the age of consent is 30. What then? Would be poor 29 y.o. ra…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:55 AM
2

He is missing one big point...many 14 y.o. girls would be more than glad to have attention from 24 y.o. hot teacher. Doesn't change the fact that they are too young.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:49 AM
2

Name - manonpoint. Wrote 47-pages-long guide on something as simple as a first date... At least it isn't 470. To be completely fair I checked this guide and actually opened pdf. Just some random fragment. " This is the crux of attraction—demonstrating that you’re high valueand “worthy” of her interest and affection " Why would a high-value man try to impress anyone by "demonstrating", let alone by "humble-bragging" which you consider the "core of attraction". Lol. I would say that advice in your…
/r/seduction10/07/20 06:42 PM
6

98% of women agreeing on a date is an impossible matter. At least 5% of women are either lesbians, asexual or transgender. How many actually have a boyfriend and are loyal to him? Even girls who aren't really loyal wouldn't choose to risk losing their bf for someone they don't know at all. If you are really super attractive then you probably can get 60-70% of straight single girls to agree to go on a date with you just by asking them from the get-go. This would be about 20-40% depending on the a…
/r/seduction10/07/20 06:24 PM
3

I hope that you were joking, but I guess that some people can be ignorant to such an extent. Did you just say that women gain muscles faster than men because they are shorter? Lol, check world records for any strength-based sport. Do you think that male and female divisions exist in all sports just because of sexism or patriarchy? Men are physically superior to women both on average and on the limit performance achievable. If the Olympics were unisex there would be no female competitors, just ch…
/r/seduction10/07/20 04:38 PM
24

Imagine being that woman. A guy asked you on a date, you rejected him. The same guy asked you again a few minutes later and you suddenly changed your mind. Lol.
/r/seduction10/07/20 04:13 PM
5

On average, women are 30% weaker than men. It is something everyone knows. Even trained women are often weaker than untrained men with rare exceptions. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7253873/ " It was hypothesized that while men are significantly stronger than trained women athletes, such differences may be removed once body size characteristics are controlled. MANOVA and MANCOVA were utilized to test hypotheses. Results indicate that untrained men have greater upper and lower body strength tha…
/r/seduction10/07/20 04:12 PM
2

You are right, but it is the case only for men who have an attractive and confident personality. An average pua fucks 2-3 girls per 100 approaches, numbers are even less for beginners. I was anti-tinder as well, that is, until I found out that you actually can get great photos even if you aren't model-looking. Check photofeeler, the same guy can be rated as 3/10 or 9/10 depending on his photos. If you can get 2-3 photos that will rate 9/10 on photofeeler then you'll get girls from Tinder easily …
/r/seduction10/07/20 11:57 AM
5

Experts wouldn't waste time on one girl from another city, but instead would go and find a hundred other girls. And then choose the best among them. Being good with women isn't about convincing girls to do anything. It is about being the most attractive version of yourself and then choosing among girls who are attracted.
/r/seduction09/07/20 04:54 PM
10

It is Tinder, dude. Get ready to be ghosted a lot. It is a large number's game, stop being so fixated on one girl, it is a waste of time. Instead of writing this post you could swipe on another 100 girls. If she is interested then she'll message you by herself. You messaging her more would be just showing your neediness.
/r/seduction09/07/20 04:51 PM
-1

Have you ever actually gamed girls, flirted hard, made them mad/obsessed with you? Have you tried slave/master roleplay, hardcore domination, making her beg for your cock? Have you ever made a girl cum 10 times in one session? How long is your sex usually lasts, have you ever fucked a girl for hours until she is completely exhausted? There are all sorts of ways to make sex more emotional, to add variety. Of course, in the end, you'll still get tired from it after doing it many times (like, for y…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 01:31 PM
7

It isn't exactly a lottery because results aren't completely random.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 10:19 AM
8

Guys miss the fact that there is quality for sex as well and it isn't even only about looks. When you have a "vibe" with a girl, sex is just way better, especially if it is kinky and to your taste. When you get laid naturally then it is easier to create the right vibe and atmosphere than when you just bang a hooker. Though some prostitutes can be great as you said, usually they take more money as well and it depends on if you are her type.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 10:18 AM
2

While I agree with that you said, boring vanilla sex is vastly inferior to proper sex session with foreplay and roleplay, when the girl submits to you completely, when it hits all your fetishes and preferences. The orgasm itself is just a small part of enjoying sex and the so-called "emotional connection" isn't something that only girls need and I don't mean here sharing your feelings or "vulnerability", but having fun and experience emotions together. It is one thing to bang a hooker or tinders…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 10:13 AM
48

From his description, she sounds like a fatty with a nice face and boobs. If she wasn't fatty then her having good tits and cute was would be enough to at least be 7/10, lol. Fucking girls you consider hot and interesting is just a very different experience, especially with some proper roleplay, teasing, etc. Orgasm by itself isn't the core of sex, at least for men.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 10:12 AM
6

You forgetting someone. Other than the first part about neediness and woman nature, the rest of the book is "how you should act, how you should dress, how you should control your posture, etc". Can't you see that reading all of this will only make a guy think that he isn't enough, that he should compensate for the lack of his value? Many guys would think "so I should learn the body language first before girls start to be interested...I see, I also should change my style...I should find new hobbi…
/r/seduction09/07/20 08:59 AM
13

It is useless just because most guys can't understand what exactly it means and miss the whole point. They are so deep in their needy mentality that they try to use this as a technique. They think "Oh, so I just need to stop being needy, and then I will, at last, start to get laid! Cool." and when they try it and not get expected results they think "Nah, it doesn't work, I need to find something else, a new 'tool' that 'works.'". Because deep inside they are still coming from wrong motivations, …
/r/seduction09/07/20 06:46 AM
6

Value is subjective if you consider a woman as "high value" you automatically put yourself below her. Neediness in a nutshell is an attempt to compensate for your lack of value by doing something that you think the other person will like. If there is nothing to compensate then you don't need to learn anything in the first place. You don't need to learn the "right things to say", or to "find cool hobbies". All of in irrelevant to attracting women with "honesty", i.e. with your personality. You sh…
/r/seduction09/07/20 06:34 AM
1

What is "wrong"? Everything I say is based on my own experience and experience of guys I know who are "naturals" with women. Attraction isn't "complex". If a girl considers you above her league she is attracted. If you are a leader in interaction she is automatically attracted. It doesn't matter if the other dude is hotter. Everything is about value. There are many ways to give value (being handsome, having social proof is a part of it), but strong frame and outcome independence (a real one, not…
/r/seduction09/07/20 05:48 AM
2

Lol, there is no "complexity" of having sex with someone. Sex is a primitive act and even animals can decide if they want to fuck someone or not. The only thing you need to know is how to have safe sex, but I personally already knew it when I was 13. Her manipulation could be as well used against someone in their forties, the age isn't a factor here.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:17 AM
67

The best thing that you can read in his book is the concept of neediness and non-neediness. If you look deeper, then the rest of the book contradicts it. If you are truly non-needy you wouldn't try to learn all this shit and rules for the sake of being liked by women. Let alone following some silly advice like "read many books to have more conversation topics with women". What can be needier than changing your whole lifestyle for the sake of women? I guess he just took away the neediness concept…
/r/seduction09/07/20 04:26 AM
0

Nope, you are saying that guys need to try hard to avoid being strange or cringe.
/r/seduction09/07/20 04:08 AM
0

So what you need to do? To be more attractive, obviously. Who is more attractive? A man who cares less, who understands that he is a catch, who has a stronger frame. So yeah, knowing that you are a catch will change the outcome because just by itself it makes you more attractive than the other guy who tries to "compete" for a girl, lol.
/r/seduction09/07/20 04:04 AM
1

It is the problem for you guys just because you compete for girls... instead of just doing what you want and having fun. Instead of being the one who evaluates people and gives the value, you do the opposite - want to be evaluated and to take the value. When I encounter such a situation I love it because it gives me a chance to have fun with both of them, to entertain myself more. Sometimes I involve other guys in our communication with a girl on my own. "Do you like her? She is cute, right? Fiv…
/r/seduction09/07/20 03:51 AM
1

Being so fixated to "match her social move" is a definition of social weakness. You can do whatever you want. If you want to talk to other girls - do it. If you want to talk to her - do it. Talk to her and the guy. I'm rarely experiencing such situations when other guys try to compete because most of my girls are from daygame. But when I do, I'm not gonna compete for a girl or try to show how cool I'm. Instead, I will advertise the guy and will try to sell the girl to him, lol. Just because it i…
/r/seduction09/07/20 03:39 AM
2

Nope, even if I was a 30-year-old virgin I would still rather watch porn than have sex with someone like her, I personally wouldn't even have an erection at her. I can't understand guys who "slay dragons" because I could get hard only for girls I find attractive. There is no problem with him being younger, 18 y.o. is old enough to have sex with anyone. The problem is her tricking him and then accusing of rape.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 03:07 AM
0

Ok. :(( It isn't "advice". The only advice I can give is to stop giving so much fuck what a girl thinks about you. There is nothin to learn about getting girls, on the contrary you should unlearn all this shit you read here.
/r/seduction09/07/20 03:04 AM
1

You don't even know me and already asking the questions that are so intimate, bro... Let's slow down a little bit, shall we? And then you can answer the question if you want. After you already evaluated the girl. It doesn't matter how you did it, it shouldn't be serious or to make sense, lol.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 03:02 AM
1

It is a seduction sub, it makes sense to tell people here that you have sex. Because if you don't, then why would anyone listen to your advice?
/r/seduction08/07/20 06:05 PM
0

It isn't about "good sex", it is about the first sex (if it's good) that only happens once, lol. And I put it below buying a new care anyway.
/r/seduction08/07/20 05:21 PM
0

What makes you desperate isn't what you say, but if you are desperate or not. I tell girls that I'm a virgin...even if I'm not. I just find it extremely funny, especially after kissing and after making her cum.
/r/seduction08/07/20 10:09 AM
1

I guess you are a very boring person. For many people, one of the best things about close friends is that you can make fun of each other without feeling uncomfortable about it. Those are people with whom you don't need to filter anything you say, you can tell them something offensive and they would laugh it off and vice versa. But I guess some people can't completely let go of their inhibitors even with those they consider friends. Or maybe you are a girl, things are different for girls. Making …
/r/seduction08/07/20 10:07 AM
2

Lines don't matter, who and how tells them is the most important. The same line would be cringe if some nerdy guy tells it in an awkward way, but people will love it if a confident man told it. Because people know that this confident guy doesn't give a fuck, he said this line because he liked it and not because he read it online and now "uses" it to manipulate people into reacting a certain way.
/r/seduction08/07/20 10:03 AM
0

So what? I told girls things that are much worse than this. Nothing matters as long as you are confident. You are too afraid to be judged by people, especially by girls. You are not so different from this guy who thinks that he should find "the right answer" beforehand. I just say things that I personally consider funny and interesting, if she thinks it is stupid then it is her problem, I didn't tell it to amuse her, but myself. If she doesn't like anything she can leave at any moment, if she is…
/r/seduction08/07/20 09:56 AM
-7

I often love to tell girls that I'm a virgin. Especially after making them cum for the first time, pretend to be shy, lol. No one believes me though. If you are confident and tell people that you are a virgin then they wouldn't even believe you.
/r/seduction08/07/20 09:51 AM
11

Basically your previous partners just sucked big time and it isn't necessary that he actually was this good, just better than them.
/r/seduction08/07/20 09:49 AM
-27

Let me answer instead of him. Just an ordinary kiss. There is nothing special about sex or kissing. In terms of pleasure, it is somewhere between tasty ice cream and buying a new car, lol. Stop treating this so serious, it isn't some kind of achievement.
/r/seduction08/07/20 09:29 AM
36

Yeah. Most girls aren't psychics, they wouldn't be able to determine if you are a kissless virgin or not. Most guys stay bad with girls and bad in sex even after being in a relationship. You wouldn't see much of a difference nowadays, because everyone knows human physiology thanks to the porn. Even virgins wouldn't miss the right hole, lol.
/r/seduction08/07/20 09:28 AM
2

IDK, in my case it is a girl who works to keep me interested 2-4 months down the road, lol.
/r/seduction08/07/20 05:14 AM
15

Ugh, I would rather become a monk than fuck this landwhale. Imagine how desperate you should be to have sex with her on your own will. Getting laid isn't easy for 18 y.o.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 05:13 AM
2

There is no battle. You can't "fuck it up" if a girl is attracted to you. If she is attracted enough then she will forgive you anything and the process of "forgivance" will make her even more attached to you. If a girl allows you that she doesn't allow any other guy then she will consider you special for her.
/r/seduction08/07/20 04:53 AM
1

If you don't care about them liking you or not then you wouldn't be bothered by their reaction in the first place. If it were the case then you wouldn't change your actions to "get more results". Try to see deeper into your motivations and world-view.
/r/seduction07/07/20 04:52 PM
1

By definition "being nice" is to make efforts to be liked by others. It is exactly what I'm talking about. In the first place, all our actions are motivated by selfish reasons. So one part of "being yourself" is being selfish and putting your own needs and desires above others. Because if you aren't trying to manipulate them into liking you, then you instead make efforts to enjoy yourself and do what you want. You never were "your true self" because you always made efforts for other people's sak…
/r/seduction07/07/20 04:41 PM
2

I would say that there is another layer there. Be the one who evaluates the girls and never accept their evaluations. This simple thing will allow you to always have a stronger frame and maintain verbal dominance. As a buyer, you evaluate a product. You don't even need to think of yourself as a product in the first place. It is easy to lose yourself when others start to evaluate you. For example what if a girl says that your shirt is strange? Most guys, even those who know about shittest, will a…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/20 01:19 PM
7

If a guy is inside his head and is always thinking how "to not be weird, asshole, selfish or bitch" then he would be stiff AF. Moreover, I do all of those things - being weird, asshole and selfish and it still gets me laid a lot. In fact, most guys who are good with girls who I know are all of this, just not in a way described in your post. You definitely should be selfish. You definitely shouldn't be afraid of being considered weird. And you shouldn't be afraid to be called an asshole. As long …
/r/seduction07/07/20 03:42 AM
1

Unless you are a model-looking guy in the top 1% in terms of attractiveness then you'd need to be assertive to get women you like. In 2020 90% of women are still always passive and never proactive. It is easy to see - just visit any club and you'll find out. Otherwise, I agree that you shouldn't fake who you are to appease someone. In fact, you shouldn't do ANYTHING to manipulate or appease someone and should "just be yourself". The problem is - most men are unable to do it because there are way…
/r/seduction07/07/20 03:36 AM
0

For most men being dominant is their natural personality, but they just too get used to holding themselves back and too afraid of any sort of verbal confrontation that they never allow themselves to be socially dominant and proactive, mistakingly thinking that "it is just my personality".
/r/seduction07/07/20 03:32 AM
15

Too many rules, you can't remember them all when in the field - even if most of them are legit. There is only one rule to follow when approaching a girl. Don't try to make her like you. Just show yourself and how you are without masks. Allow her to dislike you if she wishes so, it is her choice, just accept it and stop caring so much about her reactions. Her reactions tell you about her, not about you. If she is being rude or bitchy, then it is how she is and it has nothing to do with you. Some …
/r/seduction07/07/20 03:26 AM
1

" I am overweight by a bunch, my skin isn't clear, my hair is going grey (idek), I've got missing teeth, a lazy eye and shitty fashion sense cuz I only buy clothes once every 8 months.. am I completely fucked & any advice on what a guy like me can do to get some action?" Buy a hooker to forget about being virgin and feel pressured to get girls. Then start to work on yourself. Honestly, even with all those physical shortcomings, you can still be good with girls if your personality is strong and c…
/r/seduction06/07/20 06:18 PM
1

I've seen fat and sloppy guys get laid with hot girls just because they are confident, so your point isn't valid.
/r/seduction04/07/20 07:02 AM
1

Being rich doesn't matter unless you want to marry a woman in her thirties. Many college students slay it with women while living with their parents and earning nothing at all. I even know some guys who are awesome with women and they live at their girl's place, lol.
/r/seduction04/07/20 03:12 AM
1

The thing is - being overconfident and have delusional confidence is still the best thing when it comes to meeting women. It is the same as a bluff in poker. If you just met a girl - she doesn't know your cards. She only can know your looks and behavior, the rest she can only guess. So if you are being confident she will, by default, assume that you are great. It is something instinctual and the reason why women are attracted to confidence free of manipulations.
/r/seduction04/07/20 03:11 AM
39

For her being kind and respectful is actually equal to being submissive. It should tell you everything you need to know about her, lol. Simps don't "respect women". They literally and metaphorically kiss their asses, putting them on a pedestal they don't deserve.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:16 PM
1

What women think or what some minorities among them say online doesn't matter. I don't climb the career and social ladder and get laid more than guys who earn ten times more than me. Your problem is much deeper than that dude. You can check my post with 1,2k upvoted if you want to understand what exactly is the problem.
/r/seduction02/07/20 06:45 AM
23

" Can you think of a single case similar to this with the genders reversed?" Actually, yes, I can. Have you ever heard about 6ix9ine? You can get privileges similar to a woman if you are rich and famous enough.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 10:56 AM
1

Women are attracted to social dominance and you can't demonstrate it online. You also compete with many other men at the same time, automatically putting her in the "buyer/chooser" position. IRL you can reverse this dynamic by having a stronger frame and preselection.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/20 07:32 AM
4

"It is so cute, now be a good friend and go buy me a beer."
/r/TheRedPill01/07/20 04:12 AM
13

The main reason why they consider radfem as "hate speech" because a part of radfem is hating transgender men who become women and, as a result, get female privileges. Their mistake was to attack minorities.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:02 AM
2

Logical and reasonable beings? From a logical and reasonable point of view, there is no harm in cheating as long as you aren't getting caught or getting any STDs/pregnancies. And there are many benefits proven by studies. Rather, most men don't cheat because they are socially brainwashed. And women could be socially brainwashed even more. Do you really honestly believe that 100% of women cheat? No matter how many studies you explore, it is just not true. Denying proven facts and reality doesn't …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 02:43 PM
14

He has no reason to lie about some dude he barely knows, lol. There is no such thing as "gifted social skills". All people are born without any social skills, it is something that you learn. Just, some people are lucky enough to be in convenient social circumstances when they are in their teens. Just be honest - you have low self-esteem and not enough self-respect. If you were approached by a hot girl you'll probably think that it is a prank or something. You think that to value yourself you nee…
/r/seduction30/06/20 09:56 AM
40

Get a surrogate mother or adopt, and then raise a kid all on your own? If you have so much free time, then you'd better do something more interesting and helpful. If you care about your kid's well being then a healthy normal family with two parents is the only way around. Stop pretending that "all women are sluts, so this is impossible", everyone has examples in their life that prove otherwise. Conservative women are rare, but they do exist. Not 100% of marriages end up in divorce and cheating, …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 06:42 AM
1

While I agree with most of what you said, but there are gigolos who marry pornstars or other famous rich women, just using them for sex and money. It also gives them an additional excuse to fuck other women. Honestly, if you aren't someone who can earn millions by yourself and don't care that much about building a healthy family, then it isn't such a bad choice. It is one thing to sponsor a slut and the other to be sponsored by one. While you can say that "a man should be able to earn on his own…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 06:14 AM
1

Well, her excuse was that she is "threatened by ISIS". But if it was the case then she wouldn't try to gain so much publicity, so this is bullshit. Moreover, I don't think that terrorists have such a bad memory that deleting the videos will make them forget her, lol.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 06:06 AM
1

The point is - if you view it as you chasing girls then you'll never be truly attractive.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 03:12 AM
0

Read my analogy again, pretty pls. It explains perfectly the difference between chasing and choosing.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 02:29 AM
0

Well, he can. In theory. But it is very unlikely. In theory, a hot model can rape a neckbeard as well.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:28 AM
1

Statistically, most rapists rape because they can't get laid. Also, when a girl really attracted to you, you can easily make her beg for your cock. It is something most of them enjoy to do, actually. How is this "incel"? Incels don't know what kind of kinks most women have, lol.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:27 AM
1

Nope, you can approach without chasing. It is the difference between attempting to buy a car and a test drive. Doing a test drive means that you aren't sure yet if you'll buy the car or not. You are just testing it. When talking to girls you are testing them because you aren't sure yet if they worth your time. The problem is - most guys have no standards other than a girl's appearance. This is why they are always in the "chasing mode".
/r/TheRedPill28/06/20 04:49 PM
4

You work your entire life if you have nothing that takes it to be in the top 10% of people. Anyone can get there with effort and knowledge. Earning 10 millions will make you feel so much better than getting them from your parents.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:07 PM
1

There is no contradiction. "Getting a plate" means finding a girl who is willing to do what it takes to be yours. Being nice, submissive, hot enough, etc. You deciding the rules and if she isn't following them then you'll choose someone else. There are two ways to react when a girl shows you that she isn't interested for whatever reason. "I suck" or "she sucks". It is up to you to choose how you view the same situation. Moreover, if it is "she sucks" reaction then you still can give her a second…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/20 03:59 PM
77

Why would a person who can get a new chick beg for his cock every day sexually assault anyone? It is the same as if a fat ugly dude accused a playboy model of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 03:52 PM
8

Life isn't about a destination, it is about a journey. Getting everything you can possibly have while you are a kid is the same as playing an RPG with your stats maxed from the start. Incredibly boring and unfulfilling. The things he achieved weren't really his own. He was just a child who was lucky with his upbringing. Depending on a person being so lucky can be a very good thing if you are smart and understand life well. If you are not, then you are likely to start doing drugs and get depresse…
/r/MensRights28/06/20 03:48 PM
2

Chasing women is a HUGE time expenditure, especially cold approaches. Of course, it is. You can cold-approach without chasing and then it isn't. The problem most guys have that they can't do cold-approach without neediness and scarcity mindset. But they can do it in social circles because they can just demonstrate their social skills and attractiveness, giving women enough time to be attracted first.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/20 03:26 PM
2

Please read what goodlookingloser says about cold-approach. You can get your conversion up to 10% or even more. It is just that your conversion suffers from "taking numbers". You should set the date immediately if a girl shows interest in you. Either go for "instant date" if she is free or set the date's time for a little bit later this or the next day if she is not. " First I need to see she is worth it, and then I will take my chance. No more freebies for the opposite sex. "Yeah, right. You sh…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/20 03:01 PM
1

I want to add though that Tinder isn't a good choice for most men even if they want to have "just sex". Unless your photos are good enough for you to be considered in the top 10-20%, then you wouldn't have any success with it. Guys have a much higher chance to get sex by cold approaching.
/r/seduction27/06/20 04:53 AM
2

Bro, just be honest with yourself and the others... How many women you actually were with? How many women you actually cold approached and how many of them ended up attracted to you enough to have sex? Most guys are very nervous when they approach strangers. Without solving this first, you just can't approach girls. In some cases, it could be physically painful. There are only two real ways to solve this. One - doing very small steps forward to overcome these feelings. You can google "approach a…
/r/seduction26/06/20 10:56 AM
7

But not all men approach women to have sex or, even worse, to manipulate them into having sex. When I approach a girl I do it to see if she is cool and interesting enough. If I don't like her behavior or if her personality sucks then I wouldn't want to have sex. For most guys they already decided 100% what they want to have sex with her, putting all the pressure on a girl. Moreover, sex is the only thing they are interested in - they don't even want to talk to her or have fun together. This is w…
/r/seduction26/06/20 07:47 AM
89

Normally I live by this ideology: If you want to learn how to catch a fish, talk to a fisherman not a fish. This comparison seems to make sense at first sight, but it is a complete bullshit...why you ask? Because a fisherman and a fish are on the different teams. Lose-win. But men and women are on the same side. Win-win. Following this ideology makes you unconsciously assume that you are hurting girls by connecting with them and having sex. Guys get the wrong advice from girls because they ask t…
/r/seduction26/06/20 07:40 AM
31

Only if you assume that all girls you see are in a hurry to work. You should choose a location to approach people carefully. You can approach people at parks and other venues where they not in a hurry. A very good place to approach people (at least in my city) is near Universities when bored girls go home after completing their studies. Bars and clubs are bad places to approach, they are way too loud and intense to help you both relax, moreover there are way too many needy guys there. Another po…
/r/seduction26/06/20 07:19 AM
1

" Well I had no choice but to brush off all of those(we didn't have sex but a dead conversation on nonsense ALL NIGHT) and she went away in the morning. " Translation: I lost my frame and tried to convince her to bang me by being nice and talking about things that she considered interesting. If you don't want to talk about some bullshit, then don't. Be the one who sets boundaries and rules. Be the one who sets the frame. On a fundamental level, you are still coming from the frame that you need t…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/20 12:07 PM
39

Well, depending on how hard and aggressively he grabbed her it actually could be considered as lawful self-defense. Though realistically it is most likely was just another example of pussy-pass.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:18 PM
1

It is really easy to differentiate. Real you - is what YOU want to do, for yourself. Fake you - is what you think you should do to achieve results you want. You can do and say the same thing while being real or fake. You can approach a girl and say that she is cute because you think so and just expressing your opinion. Or you can approach her and tell her that she is cute because you want to please her so that she reacted positively. The difference would be very obvious in your body language, vo…
/r/seduction24/06/20 11:53 AM
1

I guess you didn't get anything out of my post... It isn't about being alpha or beta, it is about being real or fake. Obviously fake alphas would suck because they are fake, lol. A lot of people do fine with girls, it isn't hard. Many PUA slept with hundreds of women even if they are, on a fundamental level, unattractive AF. I guess some people are so deep in chasing mentality that they can't comprehend that someone can just enjoy a conversation to have fun instead of trying to achieve good reac…
/r/seduction24/06/20 11:50 AM
4

There are only 3% of girls who are infected with it. If you don't bang raw even your long-term plates just because you are afraid of this 3% chance then you lose a lot. Then again, if you have LTR or MLTR then you should make a girl get checked on STDs anyway.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/20 02:04 PM
7

Don't be so afraid of having sex. You should by all means use condoms, especially with the girls you barely know. They don't give 100% guarantee though, especially when it comes to such things like oral herpes.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/20 02:04 PM
18

The female diagnosis rate among 15 to 19-year-old females was 2,436.8 per 100,000 and 2,557 among females aged 20-24. If you are unlucky enough to get it 20-30% of the time I guess you fuck the 10% sluttiest girls out there, it is simple math. You don't need to check for herpes, most people have it (many get it from their mother) and I think that among girls with chlamydia 100% of them have it, so yeah...
/r/TheRedPill23/06/20 12:19 PM
18

No shit, Sherlock. Women usually date older guys. Moreover, sexual partners aren't distributed equally between men, so one guy could fuck 100 women while another will fuck 0. The number of sexually active women is a few times more than men, so of course, they'll get more STDs. Though it could also depend on how high is the risk of catching it for a man and a woman, some STDs are more infections for women as well. But your point about "not worth the risk" is complete bullshit. The majority of peo…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/20 12:09 PM
1

The perspective you're pushing isn't realistic and I believe it influences guys to be over analytical with their actions because if they start to feel anxiety or negativity in a given moment then they may think, "I'm doing something wrong or this isn't working, etc". Being mindful and in tune with the moment is the fix to this which takes practice. Overly analytical? It is a complete opposite. There is nothing that could "work" or "don't work" when you aren't doing things for the sake of anythin…
/r/seduction23/06/20 11:46 AM
1

Well, in the context of dating being like your second daughter, especially as a man, is always advantageous. This being the case, I think that it is easier how to be considerate when it is required than how to freely express yourself to be more confident.
/r/seduction23/06/20 11:38 AM
2

If you have some sort of clinical mental condition like depression or extreme social anxiety then you'd be better to get some therapy. Otherwise, it is all in your head. I can quote my other answer on how I do things, maybe it will help you. " You don't feel negative emotions not because you think positive or meditate. But because there is no reason to feel it. Why would you feel any negative emotion if nothing unexpected or undesired happened? When I approach a woman I don't do it to make her w…
/r/seduction22/06/20 07:14 PM
1

You don't feel negative emotions not because you think positive or meditate. But because there is no reason to feel them. Why would you feel any negative emotion if nothing unexpected or undesired happened? When I approach a woman I don't do it to make her want me or to convince her to fuck me. The only thing I do is showing myself, expressing my personality by amusing myself - doing and saying things I like and consider funny. My purpose would be fulfilled - always. After I showed myself for a …
/r/seduction22/06/20 07:06 PM
3

There is no such thing as a "proper response". A proper response is the one you like and/or consider funny. Try to see the underlying reason behind your actions. "A proper response" to achieve what exactly? To impress them so they could say "cool response, bro"? A conversation flows naturally when you can just let your anxiety go and just say things you enjoy to say. In a conversation amuse yourself, say things you consider funny even if other people could think it is something silly. Don't be a…
/r/seduction22/06/20 05:52 PM
1

The only reason why you are desiring positive reactions and afraid of negative ones is that you put others above yourself and are centered about getting some kind of value from them. People compare seduction to sellings, but, in fact, it is a very bad thing to look at the things. Reactions don't matter, Who you are - does. You assume that a person reacts badly because of you. Let me tell you something from my own experience. When I was a teenager there were two times when girls I didn't know app…
/r/seduction22/06/20 05:35 PM
2

It seems you can't see a deeper level. A level of sub-frames, a level of your inner motivations. The reasons WHY exactly you are doing what you are doing. And how doing things for wrong reasons could make you feel bad for no reason and ruin your chances. You don't need to learn anything that you "need to say or need to do", there is no need to add additional value to an equal exchange.
/r/seduction22/06/20 03:47 PM
2

Obviously you should understand what are you doing and why. Express yourself when you want to have fun with people. When you are talking to your boss you would need to follow social rules. You shouldn't also forget about common decency and other people's boundaries. Just because you want to touch a female stranger's tits doesn't mean you should do it to "express yourself", lol. Expressing yourself freely means doing and saying what you want for the sake of having fun. And not all your interactio…
/r/seduction22/06/20 02:31 PM
4

It seems you still didn't get my post. Wanting sex and wanting approval or trying to manipulate isn't the same thing. There is no such thing as "fail to get sex" and there is nothing to feel bad about. You don't need to "try" to achieve sex or try to "deserve" it, or use anything to compensate a girl for doing something that fucking benefits her. If she doesn't consider you on her level then she could go find someone else, why you need a girl who doesn't appreciate current you? Why you should pu…
/r/seduction22/06/20 02:24 PM
2

If you believe OP you stop trying in interpersonal situations and convince yourself that results are coming without your effort as long as you do things naturally. Nope, my point is that you should express yourself naturally. It is a very active thing, you know what you want, say what you want and do what you want. Most guys who start learning pickup stop at the first stage - the stage of actually taking action. Why? Because they want positive reactions and afraid of negative reactions. You can'…
/r/seduction22/06/20 01:16 PM
1

Anyone could check if what I said is true or not, it would take only a few minutes.
/r/seduction22/06/20 01:09 PM
1

Except, compensating doesn't make you more attractive. It is an illusion. Compensating makes you less confident, less natural, more awkward. You would need years to become good enough with faking an attractive personality. It would be faster to actually become an attractive man instead.
/r/seduction22/06/20 01:08 PM
1

I would say that more than 95% of people manipulate in one way or another when interacting with purpose in mind. They just don't realize it. When it comes to seduction this purpose is gaining approval and sex. Anyway, emotions are just how your body and brain react to all kinds of stimuli. IDK why you are assuming that you can't change emotions by changing your thinking and interpretation. You can check it in a few minutes. Just send a compliment to a random girl on Facebook. First, do it to get…
/r/seduction22/06/20 11:53 AM
1

Well, there are way too many assumptions. I don't think that all people here have "dysfunctional social life", it is different from incel sub, you know? Some guys have some success with girls but want something more (getting a great relationship, having more choices, getting hotter girls, etc), some guys experience dry spell and others have a decent social life, but without many opportunities to meet girls. I share here something that helped me personally. I have no guarantee that it would be he…
/r/seduction22/06/20 10:35 AM
2

Why are you meeting with your friends? I guess mostly to have some fun. Why are you thinking that you can't have as much (if not more) fun while being yourself? Moreover, do you really need friends who can't accept who you truly are?
/r/seduction22/06/20 10:24 AM
1

Well, you answered your own question more or less. :) "With sensitive or political topics: simply don't engage." The point of engaging in such topics is usually to argue or prove some point. Why would you need to do it in the first place? Moreover, you can see how some people, like Ben Shapiro, publicly share unconventional opinions and no one lynches them. Standup comics often do the same. So if even public figures aren't punished, then why would you be? Share your opinion if you feel like that…
/r/seduction22/06/20 10:21 AM
2

I'm far from being a scholar of Stoicism, there are way too many good things to be indifferent to pleasure. :)
/r/seduction22/06/20 10:13 AM
17

If you think something is dumb, it would be dumb. If you think something is awesome, it would be awesome...at least for you. If someone disagrees, then, well, it is their OPINION. You have your own opinion and other people have theirs. Don't mistake reality for opinions. You dislike attention because you feel judged. And, most likely, in the past, you were judged by some people negatively. Being introverted or extraverted isn't something ultimate. Each person can be at either side of the specter…
/r/seduction22/06/20 10:11 AM
9

How do you know if your personality is charming or not if you always hold yourself back, afraid of getting wrong reactions? You assume that by showing your true self you'll end up being alone your whole life, but you probably never even tried. This "fake version of yourself" can't be better than a real you, especially at first. To make it work, you'll need to waste years. But if you, instead, use those years to improve your real self, then you'll achieve so much more. The first thing you need to…
/r/seduction22/06/20 10:02 AM
1

For me, working on my world-view and values worked the best. IDK why you consider that perception is hard to change, you just need to know why exactly things are like this, then you can't "unsee" it anymore and will notice when your thoughts or actions are going from the wrong place. Trying to achieve the same thing by throwing yourself in uncomfortable situations could easily backfire.
/r/seduction22/06/20 09:45 AM
3

Just because most people do something doesn't mean that it is the right thing to do, especially if you want to achieve results above average. A lot of people on this site (me included) got hurt by some advice that comes from a very needy and manipulative place. This post is more general advice on how to start being more normal, relaxed, and confident. When it comes to dating then there is the next level though - how to be so confident that girls will start to be influenced by your personality na…
/r/seduction22/06/20 08:24 AM
4

What I'm talking about is more subtle than direct conscious manipulation. It is about the core reason behind certain actions. Let's assume you have a crush (like in your example) and you want them to react positively to you and like you. Then you'll try to choose specific actions that, in your opinion, will lead to the results you want. By definition, it is a manipulation, even if a person in question probably doesn't realize it. Your crush has a choice - either to like you or not to, either to …
/r/seduction22/06/20 08:11 AM
15

It would be easiest to understand if you have some close friends or relatives with whom you could just say things without putting much thought behind them. Just saying what pops up in your head, not expecting any particular answer. Each person has their own desires and thoughts, but when we try to manipulate reactions and turn on our social fake persona we start to hold themselves back all the time. It could take you some time to start to express yourself freely, just do it step by step. The mai…
/r/seduction22/06/20 07:40 AM
1

No matter how "bad" you think your current self is, there would be people who'll like current you. And there is no one in the world who is liked by everyone. Moreover, manipulations wouldn't make you more likable. No matter what is your current level, being yourself is the best way to "be liked" by the highest number of people. Because it makes you more confident and more comfortable. As I said in the edit to my post - you shouldn't stop to improve yourself. Do it to be the best version of yours…
/r/seduction22/06/20 07:12 AM
36

I'm glad it helped you! Remember that you don't need a reason for self-respect. Even if you aren't satisfied with yourself completely (for now) you have the right to feel yourself worthy of love and respect.
/r/seduction22/06/20 07:02 AM
8

Nowhere in the post I said to do nothing and just stare at them, lol. I said that you should express yourself instead. Then it would be always easier to start and hold a conversation. When you don't hold yourself back, your brain will start to find all sorts of funny associations naturally. If you aren't trying to achieve a certain reaction and able to accept both negative and positive reactions without taking it personally, then you will say something even if another person could think it is la…
/r/seduction22/06/20 06:24 AM
6

It isn't a problem with apps, but with people. Older dating apps didn't completely rely on a person's photos. But research showed that pictures are 90% predictor of the result. Your profile, your hobbies, your personality, your conversation, etc, don't affect results much. Interestingly enough, but using Photofeeler and checking studies I found out that unlike men, women rate pictures not only based on a man's attractiveness but more on the context of the photo and its quality. Photo with a pet …
/r/seduction22/06/20 04:04 AM
17

" She was willing to risk everything she had for sex with someone new and above her husband. " Except, it wasn't a risk, not really. In most modern countries divorce isn't a punishment to a woman, but a reward. Especially if she married someone richer.Also, it isn't really about "hypergamy" like in "women try to bang better men and get a better deal, always". Tyler wasn't a more successful player than Nathan, they are more or less on the same level. I myself fucked women who are married to dudes…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/20 05:01 AM
3

In my country (Russia) it depends on the person's age. 16 is the age of consent, so anyone can bang 16 y.o., no matter how old they are. If the person is 13-15 then it would be a crime to sleep with them if you knew their age (though it would be hard to prove that you didn't know, unless they lied and it is recorded somewhere), though there are some Romeo and Juliet laws at work as well (you can marry if you are less than 4 years apart). Also, all minors older than 13-14 can have sex with each o…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/20 05:23 PM
44

The problem is that in this bluepill society one day they can make it an actual law and make it illegal to have sex with anyone who is 15 years younger than you or something like this. Moreover, most guys would approve of it because for younger guys it means less competition and most older guys wouldn't be able to get laid with young hotties anyway. Basically, by banging hot chicks much younger than you, it makes too many people butthurt, that leads to idiotic rationalizations like the maturity …
/r/TheRedPill19/06/20 03:46 PM
9

Pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children, i.e. 12 y.o. or younger. The age of consent in most countries and states is already 16. And while you definitely shouldn't even think about fucking 13-15 y.o. because they are mentally undeveloped and unstable (this is why it is illegal in most countries), but some girls mature early and you wouldn't know their age without them telling you. One of my classmates looked like 25 y.o. when she was 14 and her voice was that of a MILF. Choosing to …
/r/TheRedPill19/06/20 03:37 PM
1

There is only one real rule to follow. Stop considering sex as something that you should "buy" or "deserve". Sex is an equal exchange, so you don't need to add any value for it. You either get it "for free" or would be better without it at all. Put your pride and self-esteem above sex and a girl's approval. I would be me and I only give two choices to a girl - to accept it or to walk off. There would be no compromise or me changing myself (like choosing "right words" to say, using techniques to …
/r/seduction18/06/20 09:50 AM
1

You never was truly "you" with girls. The only time when most people are really being themselves is when they are with their best friends. Being yourself is when you don't filter what you do or say because you don't give a fuck if the other person approve of it or not. With a best friend you know what they will accept and approve whatever you do or say. If you don't have such buddies with whom you could tell anything that is on your mind without filtering, with whom you are not afraid to be sill…
/r/seduction18/06/20 05:05 AM
1

Do you really expect to get an answer here? Simply put, the fact that guys need to learn how to get women is already putting them on a pedestal. Simply put, it isn't about putting women on a pedestal, but about not overvaluing sex. The problem is that you try to change yourself to be liked by women. Just stop doing it. Just be yourself is the best advice ever, but no one really gets it. Do what you want, not what you think girls want. Stop adjusting yourself for their sake.
/r/seduction18/06/20 04:24 AM
-1

Currently, I get more results with real women than most guys on TRP. And I'm probably better at sex as well, as I can last for at least an hour and always make a woman cum. It contradicts all this "nofap" bs. I see no reason to "defend" anything, it is just my hobby to respond to stupidity I see online. Everything I said is the fact, you can accept it or not, I don't care. I have no shame or guilt for masturbating the way I want whenever I want, I guess it is hard to understand for most guys. Th…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/20 03:58 AM
2

Have you ever heard about prostitution? In any country where it isn't illegal to buy a hooker (it is the case for the USA and most other western countries, the exceptions are Canada, Netherland, and a couple of others) any man has an opportunity to fuck a hottie for about 200$. In some countries, it is even legalized (i.e. you have a broader choice and no stigma or risks), doesn't change the fact that bluepill men don't cheat. Women could be "bluepill" in the same way as well if they are brainwa…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 06:00 PM
0

Do you understand that all people have fetishes and it is the norm? Eh, probably it is beyond your comprehension, lol.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 05:43 PM
2

By your logic people can't win against evolution. Men are polygamous. Do you really believe that all men cheat at the first opportunity they get?
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 05:41 PM
-6

Lol, the fact that you even comment on this in a condensing tone and your grammar mean that you probably have some kind of mental illness. Hentai is better than most porn because it has plot and a vaster variety of fetishes.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 05:33 PM
1

Do you understand that men are polygamous by nature, right? You are just spouting nonsense right now.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 05:29 PM
1

Train your PC muscle, learn how to relax it, learn about edging and deep breathing. It isn't easy to learn how to last longer in bed, use google.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 05:27 PM
-4

From a neuroscientific point of view, there is no big difference between watching porn or fucking many new women all the time. Oversaturation is the same, dopamine overdose is the same. The difference is only that by fucking real women you perceive the raise of your subjective status while masturbating on porn could make you insecure if you don't "own it" and consider as weakness instead of your conscious choice to enjoy yourself. Another difference is that you risk STDs and pregnancy by fucking…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 05:25 PM
0

The recording should be consensual and I'm not sure, but depending on a country you also can't share the vids with other people without her permission.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 04:43 PM
0

I watched porn for more than 10 years since I was 12-year-old and my erections were always rock hard even from a small stimulation. So, people are different. Though then again, at some point I started to mostly watch hentai, so maybe it didn't affect my view of real women. You can also achieve the same effect of strong erections by doing certain exercises (Angion method). In fact, in a year you could get so strong and long erections that no amount of nofap could help you to achieve because by do…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 04:41 PM
2

Does upbringing and religion guarantee anything? No. Do they make the chance of failure lower? Yes. Please don't be ridiculous. Statistically, most people don't even cheat. Statistically, in many countries divorce rates are less than 80%. Statistically, there are enough long-lasting marriages without any cheating. Humans, men or women, are different from other animals and can control themselves to some extent. There are things that are more important than just some tasty fuck. Moreover, most men…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 04:24 PM
7

IDK, I checked the comments for his previous post and the top answers are "Dude, you are being blind", "Flirty? They've clearly been nailing each other. Tell her to....and feel free to paraphrase..."fuck right off", and " RUN.SAVE YOURSELF.". Society sure is bluepill, but not completely cucked.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 03:20 PM
6

Extinction of a population is literally impossible in a modern world, lol. Simple math would let you understand that even if current birth rates in any modern country decreased by tens of times it would still take hundreds of generations for complete extinction. Anyway, who gives a fuck about humanity? I only give a fuck about my own life and, at most, my children and grandchildren. I don't give a fuck what would be 200 years later, I would be long dead.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 03:17 PM
-1

Overpopulation is a problem, not something to be proud of. I personally think that birthrates should be controlled by the government to avoid overpopulation, but it is already too late for China and India. Quality is more important than quantity. Hundred million people is already a lot for an average country, why would you need even more people, for what? In modern times the quantity of humans doesn't even matter when it comes to wars. The USA or Russia could easily destroy India if it comes to …
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 03:11 PM
1

You are right, but you are also wrong. There are enough women who wouldn't cheat even if they want because of their upbringing or religious views. Women are hypergamous, sure. But men are polygamous which is supposed to be even "worse" for any monogamous relationship. And still, many men don't cheat even if they want and have an opportunity. Also, back when divorce laws weren't so beneficial for women, they were less willing to cheat because they financially depended on a man and being found out…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/20 03:04 PM
3

By this I mean to make a girl feel strong emotions. You achieve it by having a sense of humor and charisma.
/r/seduction13/06/20 12:59 PM
1

To get laid? No. To have a better life? Yes.
/r/seduction13/06/20 12:53 PM
2

There are not enough girls who only want sex for every guy. And those girls usually choosing their partners based on physical appearance only.
/r/seduction12/06/20 03:30 AM
8

Even they can't get "whoever they want" because women always want to have someone above their league invested in them. If a woman is in the top 1% then she would want to get investment from the top 0,1% man, etc.
/r/seduction12/06/20 03:28 AM
46

Sex? No. Emotions? Fuck yeah. To get sex the only thing you need to be able to provide is strong emotions. " hobbies, goals, a personality, and a life of your own " is bullshit. No one gives a fuck, women included. Though no, those women who want to settle with someone safe will care about your financial situation, sure. By the way, most guys can't even offer GOOD sex. They can offer 5 minutes of frictions. You don't need to choose your hobbies and goals based on what women think. If you enjoy M…
/r/seduction12/06/20 03:22 AM
2

If it's verbal then hold your frame and destroy his. It is the same as dealing with shit tests. In fact, verbal attacks are shit test at its core. And it is something some people learn how to deal with starting from their childhood. This is how "naturals" are born in the first place. Moreover, a kid can't "kick his ass" if there are multiple bullies. Or simply if an opponent is stronger. The easiest way to avoid any sort of conflict or bullying, any sort of disrespect - is to destroy it at its c…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/20 06:20 PM
1

Being attacked either physically or verbally triggers "fight or flight" response. You can only choose one of it. Not reacting is a form of submission and "flight" type of response.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/20 05:52 PM
1

How long back are you talking about? Until 10 000 years ago, most humans died in tribe wars before they hit their forties. Without a proper society and law enforcement, humans are just aggressive wild animals.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/20 05:48 PM
-1

Realistically our ancestors weren't even close to the abundance of all types of food we currently have though. So your point about "not getting as many nutrients and minerals" is invalid. Biologically you don't need to live for a hundred years, even fifty is already too much. Ancient people died much earlier, so they didn't really care so much about their health.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/20 05:47 PM
1

"It's like bullying in school, when a kid doesn't give a fuck that kids call him short or fat, they usually stop. " Actually, ignoring bullies is the worst advice you can give to a kid. Ignoring disrespect towards you is something that allows assholes to feel the power. There is a difference between "not giving a fuck" and "not punishing bad behavior".
/r/TheRedPill11/06/20 05:42 PM
3

If you're actually seeing the way you interact with women like 'put in friendly conversation/time/attention until a price is met and she gives you sex' I totally disagree, but it's an interesting topic to have a discussion about. But this is how most guys get laid in the first place. This is how you get laid when a girl considers you of the same or lower value. You compensate the lack of value with your commitment. If a girl searching for a boyfriend, then she is trying to find a guy who is the …
/r/TheRedPill09/06/20 02:54 PM
-1

Kids as young as 7-8 years wouldn't watch porn because they are pre-pubescent and can't get sexually aroused except in some rare cases. For them watching human porn is the same as for you watching monkey porn - unexciting and gross. So it isn't something you should be worried about.
/r/seduction08/06/20 04:53 PM
3

There are different types of porn, including those with a lot of oral sex and fingering... it is just that it isn't so popular. When men watch porn they do it to get an orgasm and most of us would skip "pleasuring a woman" part anyway. The problem here is that many guys don't even try to improve their bed skills, instead they would blame women for not being sexy and sensitive enough. To get better in sex you should first acknowledge that you aren't exactly too good at it and many guys don't want…
/r/seduction08/06/20 04:49 PM
18

It isn't normalized, it is the norm. I don't know any guy who didn't watch porn regularly at one point in his life. The problem is - some people are just too lazy and unmotivated to improve their life unless there is a strong motivation and being sexually satisfied doesn't help you to take action. This is also the reason why people often stay in shitty relationships instead of trying to find a better partner. Having a partner or watching porn all the time makes you too comfortable to actively pu…
/r/seduction08/06/20 04:44 PM
85

Almost all guys I know watched porn every day when they were in their teens. Pretty much everyone without a girlfriend does it. It wasn't the core reason of your problems, for most guys it doesn't affect them much. Masturbation doesn't really stop you from having friends and hobbies or trying to get a girlfriend. Why should you lose your confidence over it? The problem wasn't porn, but your self-view and shame associated with it. Anyway, as long as it works for you it is good.
/r/seduction08/06/20 12:56 PM
1

No measures in existence? Just lol. Compare the number of infected in China and the USA, then tell me that there are no measures to prevent the infection from spreading. You are right about the government of the USA (and many other countries for that matter) though, they just don't give a fuck about people being sick or die. For them, money is a more important factor. Also, there really no way for you to be infected if you aren't contacting other people. And as long as you aren't working and hav…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/20 06:00 AM
1

You are apparently missing the fact that about 1/3 of all people infected by COVID experience long-term consequences to their health, to kidneys in particular. Just because it isn't always mortal doesn't make it "just a severe flu".
/r/TheRedPill06/06/20 05:47 PM
3

Statistically, many more black people are killed by other black people than by whites. It is a fact. If there were no ghetto culture, mostly black gangs, rappers that praise crime, etc, then most signs of racism would disappear within a few years. Barely anyone discriminates against successful black people and Obama proved it years ago.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/20 05:35 PM
2

Just because there are people who won the lottery once doesn't mean that you should play it.
/r/seduction06/06/20 12:55 PM
1

Yeah chick friends are so much more valuable then guy friends. Only in the aspect of getting laid. In anything else, male friends are the best.
/r/seduction04/06/20 04:25 PM
2

Check statistics of how much an average of them earns. My argument is " Most so-called "Instagram models" and "camwhores" don't earn shit, the same goes for OF. " It is a fact. I know some Russian camgirls, decently hot, they earn about 500$ per month if working every day for 1-3 hours. Even for someone from Russia, that earning isn't nearly enough, let alone for any westerner. Like in most other industries, the top 5% earns 95% of the cash. And it isn't even about girl's looks, but how good she…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 04:04 PM
0

I agree with you about women like this being whores. But this " Girls are dropping out of high school and college and getting money just by preying on desperate guys. It’s not empowering. It’s not hard work. It’s just taking nudes and leeching money off desperate men. " Is bullshit. It is the same as saying that "selling off food is the same as preying on desperate hungry people". As long as your work satisfies someone's needs it is fine. There is no one to "blame" because nothing bad happens. I…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:48 PM
-1

The death penalty shouldn't be implemented for rape (unless the victim is a little child, then maybe) itself or for false rape allegations - it would be extreme. Also, pedophiles are those who are attracted to prepubescent kids, i.e. younger than 12. I never heard about a case when a woman avoided punishment for that. There are cases when men and women sometimes avoid punishment for having sex with someone below the age of consent, but old enough to have sex, i.e. 14-15, or 14-17 in case a teach…
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:39 PM
9

Yeah, even in countries without such a law, women almost never get the death penalty anyway.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:29 PM
3

It is a joke. If you aren't satisfied with your "ruined life", nothing can stop you from suicide. As long as you are alive there is always a choice. But dead people have no choice.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:27 PM
38

Yeah, and women aren't executed because there are no influential women in the Belarussian politics world, lol.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:26 PM
19

Sorry, but this is one of the least problematic things in Belarus. This country is almost at the level of North Korea in terms of how bad the government is.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 01:25 PM
1

Let me open your eyes a little bit. Men who have decent success with women can have rather low standards for sex and high standards for relationships. So if a guy interested only in sex with you and nothing more, then maybe it isn't he is a "fuckboy", but you who don't meet his standards for relationships. And if a woman always meets those guys who aren't interested in anything other than her body, then it is almost certain that she just has nothing else to offer. Then again, desperate guys woul…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/20 02:27 PM
2

I'm not even sure you can communicate status on there. You actually can. There are even studies about it. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275761707_Manipulated_luxury-apartment_ownership_enhances_opposite-sex_attraction_in_females_but_not_males https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19302732/ Getting matches on Tinder isn't only about your appearance - it is more about the "image" of you as a high-status cool guy, your average value. If you are 10/10 in looks, but your photos suck, then you wo…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/20 02:19 PM
1

In an overcrowded bus no one can see her "grinding her ass" because everyone is cramped anyway, and she can always use an excuse that it wasn't intentional. The same thing often happens in night clubs when there are many people in close proximity to each other.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/20 01:56 PM
1

Why does this seem so strange to you, though? I have had some female strangers grind their ass on me in the middle of an overcrowded bus when I was in college, almost consistently. Women do this type of shit when they are in the circumstances of having no responsibility for their actions.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/20 05:39 PM
1

Lol, you are so triggered over two letters? My "writing mannerism" comes from the fact that English isn't my native language and so I sometimes use words that are commonly used in my mother tongue.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/20 05:10 PM
1

Yeah, he should spend years to get a different lifestyle he doesn't even want, just to get laid... instead of faking this lifestyle with 1/100 of efforts and getting the same women in less amount time, lol.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/20 07:19 AM
3

Just to get your dick wet? No. To get laid a lot with women who otherwise wouldn't fuck you? Yeah, if you have nothing better to offer. It always was the case. If you are after casual sex, then it never was easy to get.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/20 07:17 AM
1

Em, I'm pretty much sure that you just have seen one other post from OP about him getting laid after 2 years of cold approaches. I can't remember any other posts about "Asian dating guru". BTW, I'm really surprised that this post gets downvoted. Because it has exactly the same message and not different from all those posts about getting laid on Tinder. The thing is - faking your social status online works. Everything in this post is legit and there are even studies about it.https://www.researchg…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/20 07:14 AM
1

Lol, dude. It isn't a matter of a choice. It is how everyone's brain works. Your's as well. You are just deluding yourself. Your beliefs mean nothing. All primates are programmed to determine their subjective social status based on outside validation. It isn't something you can influence with your opinions.
/r/seduction26/05/20 07:02 AM
1

It doesn't work exactly this way. If you perceive something as rejection, then you will automatically feel bad about it. Your feelings aren't a choice. You can only choose a different interpretation of the same event. Those guys who naturally don't give a fuck about "rejection" don't even think about this as one. They never consider themselves to be rejected, they consider that it is a girl who lost her chance with them by being bitchy or unreceptive. It is a little bit narcissistic, but it is t…
/r/seduction24/05/20 03:41 PM
1

Chasing is a mentality, not just an action. You start chasing even before you approached a woman if from your perspective you are already sure that you want her and already made your choice. It isn't about what exactly you do, but how you perceive the dynamic between you and her. If you want sex from her and trying to find a way to "convince" her somehow to give it to you, then you are in chaser mentality by default. If your sub-communication is "I like you and I will try to make you like me bac…
/r/seduction24/05/20 03:51 AM
-3

Again, you don't get it. It isn't a fucking choice. You do the same, want you to acknowledge it or not. It is how our brain works.
/r/seduction23/05/20 04:28 AM
15

You are a stupid loser and you would never be happy! I don't really mean it, but your probably felt something inside while reading it, even if I'm just some anonymous guy in the internet. You can deny it, but you know the truth better than me. The thing is, your reaction to something isn't a choice. Emotions are automatic. You can change them only by changing your world-view. But even then, you still can't be completely free from other people's reactions on you. Self-validation is impossible bec…
/r/seduction22/05/20 06:33 PM
474

" I swear it makes me feel like shit, it basically says "you're not even worth getting rejected properly, I'm leaving you alone with your thoughts so you can wonder where you went wrong". " ​ And that is your problem. What do you mean "where you went wrong"? It isn't a game to please a girl, for god's sake. You can't do "anything wrong". Stop putting yourself in a chaser mentality. Be a chooser. You choose the girls who are worth your time. Objectively both men and women have the right to choose…
/r/seduction22/05/20 06:02 PM
22

Em, he bangs other girls and has an abundance mentality. It isn't about this being alone. It is about feeling bad when the other person treats you as if you nothing to them. You will probably feel shitty even if you don't really care so much about them personally.
/r/seduction22/05/20 05:56 PM
1

People like you are the reason why MRM often dismissed. Nothing can excuse the abuse those girls experienced, even if they acted stupid and naive at the start. Have you even read the article and checked the pictures? Teenage pregnancy is nothing terrible, it isn't an issue here. Beating someone, physically abusing, threatening to kill them, raping them, cutting off their fucking finger - how is this could be excused?
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:32 PM
3

Phobia is an irrational fear by definition. Being afraid of Muslims that commit terrorism, murders, and rape ISN'T irrational. Not all Muslims are like this, sure. But you definitely should avoid people from nations where extreme beliefs are the norm.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:29 PM
1

Who gives a fuck about the reasons? You acknowledged yourself that Asian and Eastern European girls are different. You just said that "it is because they are more restrained because of their culture". Well, exactly. Humans are different from other animals. The problem with AWALT (i.e. all women are hypergamous) is that if you turn it around, then you will find that ALL men are polygamous. And it is the truth. But there are countless men who stay loyal to their gf/wife. Women are humans too, ther…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/20 03:04 AM
3

Yeah, but you probably never thought...that different people enjoy different things. For some other dudes, a good life is playing Magic: the Gathering with his homies, maybe football or basketball and then some video-games. If your advice is to completely change the way you live just to get laid, then it isn't less desperate than trying to manipulate women with secret tactics. Not all people enjoy a crowded social life or meeting new people all the time. The thing is - you didn't even follow the…
/r/seduction19/05/20 06:50 PM
5

It isn't about "having actual lives". It is about not treating women as the reason for your existence and not treating sex as a prize you should win with all you have. Basically to not put women and sex on a pedestal. And it is really a catch 22 because most of the pickup is about how to get this pussy by doing all the work, by learning a lot of shit, etc. Basically, the inner game and the outer game contradict to each other. But you know what? As long as your fundamentals (i.e. looks, style, vo…
/r/seduction19/05/20 06:31 PM
1

It is not "propaganda". It is what makes this music popular in the first place. Because most guys are simps and they can feel empathy by listening to this kind of music.
/r/seduction14/05/20 04:44 PM
1

Gaming? How exactly? In most western games, older ones, in particular, there are barely any women. And in Japanese games, women are just harem members to make you enjoy popularity, lol.
/r/seduction14/05/20 04:43 PM
1

So, why are you sending the link that proves my point? Bullies are high in the social hierarchy of high-schoolers. They are socially dominant and it gets them laid, obviously, though being an asshole wouldn't work so well in adult life.
/r/seduction14/05/20 04:38 PM
1

Women don't have "unrealistic standards" when it comes to looks. They have "unrealistic standards" when it comes to casual sex. And it makes perfect sense because from an evolutionary point of view there is a value in "just sex" only with someone of much higher value than she is, i.e. genes. When it comes to long term relationships looks doesn't matter. Also, being perceived as someone of higher value isn't just about looks, it is about your image. There are researches proving that even in onlin…
/r/seduction14/05/20 03:49 PM
1

Your logic is bullshit. If you never met any below average looking guy who gets laid with hot girls IRL then you are probably living in your parent's basement and don't leave it. Or just don't have any male friends, lol. Sorry, but in reality, the guy who fucks all the girls at school/uni isn't the most handsome one. It is a guy who is a leader, who is confident and socially dominant. Even if he is below average in looks. Social hierarchy trumps physical looks. Women are different than men, peri…
/r/seduction14/05/20 02:45 PM
1

When it comes to online dating, statistically, women consider 80% of men below average, 15% "average" and 5% - above average. By this definition, he is, most likely, "ugly", i.e. not in the top 20% of the guys. xD Most girls swipe only on 10% of guys, so online dating isn't a way to go for an average guy. It is good only for extremely hot guys who are willing to have casual sex with girls below their league. Otherwise, you should only meet women in real life, there you will have a chance to actu…
/r/seduction14/05/20 02:36 PM
1

You are right about online dating but very wrong about real life. It is just a common sense that Tinder and reality don't work in the same way. If you never met a below-average looking guy who gets laid with hot girls then you are just not a very social guy or just don't pay attention to details. Personality (whatever it means) would get you more if you are actually meeting women in person through social circles, cold approaches, etc.
/r/seduction14/05/20 02:32 PM
2

I guess because to get 100 matches an average guy would need to swipe on thousands of women. And then out of those 100, only 5 will be "not wasting your time". And in most cases, that 5 % would be those you swiped just out of desperation or without paying attention to their photos, lol.
/r/seduction14/05/20 02:28 PM
2

Those things are about your image, not your inherent looks like your face or height. This is the point. By definition "looks" is about how good looking you are. What you and OP talk about isn't looks, it is your image - what kind of impression you give to others with your style, body language, voice, etc. The main difference is that your "image" isn't related to your genetics, it is something you create with your efforts. The same guys who argue that "looks are everything" in 99% also mean genet…
/r/seduction12/05/20 04:43 AM
2

You are posting this in the thread from a short Asian guy who started to get laid consistently. Looks don't matter. Your image - it does. If you obviously look like a lose, neckbeard, or weeb, then most girls will dismiss you from the start and you'd need to play the "game" on a high difficulty. Also, it isn't like OP did have any solid "game" or "frame" in the first place. Chasing girls as if your life depends on it is one of the weakest frames in existence. Trying to please a girl by following…
/r/seduction11/05/20 06:43 PM
1

It isn't about being ugly. OP didn't become more handsome. Just, before, he probably looked like a loser. And now he started to look like a cool guy. Guys want hot girls, girls want cool guys. It is as simple as that.
/r/seduction11/05/20 06:38 PM
3

I really don't know why you mentioned the age of consent here though. If you are under 18 then you can fuck anyone who is older than 12-14, depending on your country, and consensual sex among people of the same age group is always legal. Also, in almost all states of the USA, the age of consent is 16 as well.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/20 04:18 PM
17

They removed it because the opinion was "too popular", as it seems. Lol. By this logic all posts that are able to get in top should be removed as well.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 03:34 PM
5

Most men don't have a good dating life though. It is just a common sense that an average person will have an average dating life. And it would be sleeping with like 4-6 girls throughout your whole life, dating the first one who showed any interest in you and then eventually marrying her if she isn't crazy and you didn't catch her cheating. People just use the wrong tools for the wrong purposes. In fact, PUA isn't about getting laid as a loser or finding a girlfriend. It is about how to sleep wit…
/r/seduction10/05/20 04:28 AM
1

Op didn't become more physically attractive, but still, start to get more girls. It isn't about it. It is about being cool and looking cool. Being dominant and looking dominant.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/20 04:56 PM
1

The thing is, the same thing could be said about money. Is it worth it to work 50+ hours per week to earn more, especially if you are already above average in terms of income? The thing is - life is hollow by default. There is no real meaning in life, only the meaning you give to it. Your financial success and status wouldn't make you happy and neither would women. True satisfaction comes from within. But it is surely better to earn more and to fuck more. As long as it doesn't prevent you from l…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/20 04:53 PM
4

Yeah, right. There is a big difference between looking like a cool guy and looking like a loser.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/20 04:37 PM
1

You are saying it as if getting sex is easy and relationships is hard. But for men it is the other way around. As long as you are good at getting sex, women would chase you to get in relationship with you.
/r/seduction08/05/20 01:21 AM
1

Seduction isn't about getting ALL women. It is about being able to attract high enough % of the population for it to be worth the effort. I would say if you can only get 5% of women you approached, then you will be able to have as much sex with different women as you want. Also, if a guy is good enough to hide his inner self then you will never know. It is a typical Survivorship bias, lol. If women were good at figuring this out, then there wouldn't be so many victims of the so-called narcissist…
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:56 PM
1

Mate choice isn't so complicated in humans, let alone objective. Simply put, women try to find a partner "above their level". But this perception is subjective. You can be viewed as equal or above her league because you are hot, rich, or popular. Or maybe because you established your social status as above hers by being good in conversation - good at teasing, making her lose all her status. This is why many talk about "naturals who treat women like shit". And this is why seduction is about teasi…
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:50 PM
1

Having sex isn't selfish as long as you make her cum. Women enjoy good sex much more than men do, a clit is way more sensitive than a penis, female orgasm is a few magnitudes stronger as well. Most men need sex for validation and as proof that they are popular, not because it feels vastly better than masturbation (often sex is worse). But for women good sex is one of the best pleasures existing in life. It is just that women need to be more choosy because they aim for quality in most cases, more…
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:39 PM
1

Em, they banged her, so it was a success for them. Who said that she broke up with them not because they just got bored with her after some time?
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:28 PM
0

One of the "tools"? C'mon, just be honest and tell everyone that you aren't the guy who wrote the post, but just someone who copied it from the forum. Naturals don't think in terms of tools or means to get laid.
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:27 PM
0

There is no magic. You can't "act" attractively if you aren't even interacting with a woman. Attractive behavior is what you DO when you already talk to each other. And this should somehow happen.
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:26 PM
2

I'm 100% sure that I've read the same exactly post on one of the old seduction forums YEARS ago. Maybe I would even find a link. Oh, found. https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=135&t=201152&sid=1ca746f7d6387e80b41800e3be816872 I wonder if you are the same guy? Or just someone who copypasted it, lol. If it is the former, then your laziness is...
/r/seduction06/05/20 02:23 PM
1

Weight change is always determined by caloric surplus or deficit. Not really. Have you ever heard about metabolism and its speed? Do you know how nutrients are absorbed by your organism? Eating 2000 calories doesn't mean absorbing 2000 calories. There are countless people who gain or lose their weight without changing their eating habits. The former case is especially common. Many men/women suddenly start to gain a lot of fat as they get older, even if they eat the same quantity of food, consumi…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/20 02:11 PM
1

I agree with your opinion that OMAD is bs, but for different reasons. You just can't digest all the necessary nutrients with just one meal a day. So yeah, " Like I said, eating 2500 calories over 5 meals is no different than 1 meal of 2500 calories. " there IS a difference. In the first place, it isn't even possible for a normal person to eat 2500 calories in one go, let alone digesting it.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/20 06:00 AM
2

It depends on your definition of "lustful". Men are more motivated to have sex, but women enjoy high-quality sex much more. Because motivation and enjoyment are regulated by different neurotransmitters.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/20 05:33 AM
0

Nope. Do you think this Alonso guy tries to sell himself to women? Hell no. He doesn't try to sell himself. Men are the buyers, not women. Instead, he just doesn't treat the women's product (i.e. sex) as valuable. Take away sexual value from a woman and she is just a childish and weak human being. And this is exactly how he treats them.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/20 03:17 AM
2

The thing is - guys don't understand that the game Alonso has isn't him being crafty or calculating about getting laid and doing specific steps to achieve his goals. No. He just has a worldview in which women are below him. From his perspective, all waitresses are low-value little sluts who can be teased for fun and fucked if they are smart and obedient enough.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/20 02:41 AM
3

But they will help you at online game a lot. I'm pretty much sure that OP would get more success online than Alonso. Much more. Game work wonders IRL, but it isn't something that could bring you pussy from Tinder.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/20 02:35 AM
3

I checked this out just now. It is highly rated on imdb, 95% users liked it on google and it has 99% user score on rotten tomatoes...all the while getting only 35% score from critics from there. xD Most people aren't brainwashed, you see. But there a lot of propaganda out there.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 05:30 PM
10

This is simple, really. The so-called sexualization is an absurd concept at its core. It tries to forbid us to judge people based on their sexual attractiveness...when it comes to choosing sexual partners. Seriously? Feminists basically try to discourage men from treating women as potential mates. They just changed the definition to "treating as an object". You don't fuck objects. You fuck those you are interested in as an opposite sex. ​ The sexual attraction is important and being interested i…
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:31 PM
1

Maybe it is the case for a movie, but this picture clearly depicts a woman who takes care of two kids, one of them is a man.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 04:53 PM
2

People just overestimate the advantage they get thanks to their weight or physical power. Your weight category matters, but only at a similar skill level. She is 135lbs which is about average for a skinny guy. Would she be able to beat a trained athlete much above her weight league? Of course no. Would she be able to kick the average man's ass? Easy. Would she be able to beat a guy who is strong, but has zero training in martial arts? Sure. To knock someone out you only need one unexpected hook …
/r/TheRedPill24/03/20 03:23 PM
1

Em, why you suddenly assume that he just was in a gym only a few times? Many guys who actively lift weights still stay skinny fat even after bench press 100kg or more. Have you ever seen powerlifters? Many of them are far from being ripped. If he is skinny fat at 80kg then he isn't really a "small" guy and his height is a little bit above average as well. In comparison, his girl is very tall and big (for a girl), so she probably still can win the untrained guy who is less than 60kg or just fat w…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/20 05:41 PM
2

Most people who pay for coaching are those who can't get results with free/cheap info. And most of them stuck at the first stage of approaching women without feeling like shit. The thing is - many guys can't force themselves to take action enough. And they need someone to push them out of their comfort zone. The fact is - there is nothing wrong with paying to someone to help you get laid or learn social skills. And there is nothing wrong with selling books/videos about it. The thing is - if you …
/r/seduction12/03/20 01:15 PM
3

Em, it is apparently not true. People believed Zoë Quinn even after she proved more than once that she is lying crazy bitch, the guy even killed himself because of her accusations. People would still " believe a woman" even if the ugliest out of them accuse super popular guy who wouldn't fuck her even if she paid him. People believe the accusations in 100% cases unless the man actually proved his innocence, then only about 30% still believe the woman.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:49 PM
1

Em, I would say that it would be cool if each guy who used Tinder was a fuckboy, looool.
/r/seduction07/03/20 02:52 AM
6

The difference is - guys swipe on anyone more or less attractive. It is enough if you aren't ugly. And women swipe only on the top 5-10% of guys. Can you see the difference? On the other hand, Tinder creates the ILLUSION that women care about looks. They are not. If they did, they would act exactly like the men do and swiped on all more or less hot guys, like 30-40% of us. And they would rather swipe on the hot guy with shitty photos, than on average dude with awesome photos (and factually they …
/r/seduction07/03/20 02:47 AM
1

Who said anything about USA? Rehabilitation doesn't work ANYWHERE in the world. Because adult people aren't kids who don't know what is good and what is bad. When they do criminal acts they already understand that they do something wrong, but just don't care.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 08:47 AM
-6

Factually most 13 years old boys are stronger than an average adult woman. And some of them are stronger than an average adult man. Some 13 years olds are 185 cm tall and have experience in martial arts, so you can't say for sure that they are weaker. Actually, in my country, the group of 13-14 years old boys recently raped and then killed a woman in her late thirties. And then was another case when 13 years old boy killed the adult man, alone. You shouldn't underestimate teens - they can kill a…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 03:38 AM
3

Those two things aren't connected. 10 years old kid is mentally superior to any animal in the world other than an adult human. But if a dog actually bites someone to death then you wouldn't be lenient to it just because it is stupid and its brain isn't as developed as human's one. No, you just sterilize it. Normal humans never commit extreme crimes like sadistic murder or violent rape, if 12-15 years old kid did it, then it means he is psycho and it isn't likely that he would change.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:56 PM
2

Rehabilitation? It is a joke, most criminals do crimes either because their brain works differently or because of social-economic factors. https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/famous-prisons-incarceration/rehabilitative-effects-of-imprisonment/ ​ Funny fact, but some crimes were less common in the middle-ages even if it was much easier to avoid the punishment. Why? Because public punishments make people afraid much more than getting a paid vacation with free food and longings. For people wi…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:51 PM
1

The sex god method is something that changes your world-view and, if you practice the things from there regularly and successfully, makes you more confident. It is a so-called natural game and you become good at this by changing your mind-sets, experiencing success with hot girls - exactly what you did.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/20 11:46 AM
8

Em, how is it fine not to go to jail for actual crimes? Man, woman or child - everyone should be punished for breaking the law. I would agree though if instead of prison people get different punishment for lesser crimes. It isn't fine if someone who was unable to pay alimony would be in the same prison with drug dealers and gang members.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 07:56 AM
1

"Never seen something like that but I’m not British so I could argue British girls are very uninhibited. Just be young and good looking and you’ll have hordes of women of all ages begging you for sex." Lol. You answered your own question. You never saw anything like that because it is something that rarely happens. The reason why this guy rejected her is most likely because it was the first time for him to be asked out by a girl (or she was ugly, but I assume you would mention it if she was), so…
/r/seduction02/03/20 04:18 AM
1

Em, how exactly would Law School help her to "win back" ex-boyfriend? Would she learn how to blackmail him with false sexual assault accusations? I guess it would work.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:40 AM
4

Try a different program. I gained 12kg (with minimal fat gains) in a half a year by following a minimalist full-body routine. https://revolutionarylifestyledesign.com/how-to-build-muscle/ https://www.sosuave.net/forum/threads/gain-muscle-fast-heres-how-i-do-it.153622/ ​ But if you want fast results with women - just get your bodyfat at 10%. As I said, how big you are matters more to men than to women (it is about dominance). To women, it is important how lean you are. This guy is "most right-swi…
/r/TheRedPill29/02/20 06:13 AM
1

You people don't get it. Unlike the Gillette, this vid is upvoted. It means that the TA loves it. Do you really think that the singer was the one who worked on the lyrics and video? Lol, she can only sing, nothing else, she just sells a part of her body - the voice. There are countless people behind her who know how to sell. I bet that lyrics were written by a man who just understands modern society well enough to predict what would be popular.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:07 AM
18

It isn't about being BIG (OP isn't a big guy), it is about having low body fat. There are many male models who aren't exactly muscular, but they all have a 6-pack. If you gained 16kg and trained for two years then I'm pretty much sure that you already big enough, start working on lowering your fat %.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/20 02:41 PM
10

It isn't about sexual gratification. It is about being popular with people, about the knowledge that women WANT you, about social and sexual abundance. Most of our inner problems are because of the negative feedback we got from people in the past. So of course getting positive feedback will solve those.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/20 02:38 PM
1

Highest rated posts of this sub in a nutshell nowadays. "Oh, I'm a virgin and talked to the girl for the first time and still alive and she didn't say that I was creepy, fuck yeah!" - "Oh, cool bro!" "Just be yourself, girls want to fuck guys all the time, it is easy!" - "Yeah, right!" "You shouldn't be needy, you just need to change your whole lifestyle to the one what is considered cool by girls, but don't be needy - you just need to do your own thing and girls will flock on you by themselves!…
/r/seduction27/02/20 04:06 PM
14

It isn't true though. If you are a smart man with options and you are looking for a woman to settle with then you wouldn't choose the hottest girl you know, no. You'll choose the girl who has the best compatibility with you, who is the most conservative, who doesn't have slutty past and was raised in a decent traditional family. And if a woman's personality sucks, if she isn't feminine enough or loyal enough, then she would struggle to get a relationship with someone of her own level, let alone …
/r/TheRedPill26/02/20 06:59 AM
5

You forgot the fact that he was with his daughter and, probably, didn't want to involve her in all this shit.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:16 PM
9

The prejudice against gays isn't about orientation. It is mostly related to being on a receiving end of anal sex. In many other primates, anal sex is a way to humiliate a male, to show what he is of lower social status in the hierarchy. For humans, it also happens in prisons and men humiliated in this way. This kind of thing is more instinctual than social. So many guys feel inner aversion when thinking about it (as it is associated with humiliation and loss of status) and so all the hate gays g…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:13 PM
2

I guess one of the reasons is that you actually need to open the study and check it for yourself. The top comment is about link being on my site, lol.
/r/seduction25/02/20 02:17 AM
1

The difference for a woman isn't statistically significant. Basically, 51% of likes a woman got in the dominant variant of the photos.
/r/seduction25/02/20 02:16 AM
0

Just lol. This website is the official website of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. It would be cool if it was mine. And now everyone who isn't retarded is my other acc, I see. I'm pretty much sure that the same post of mine would be at the top just a year ago. I guess the sub now belongs to simps and women now.
/r/seduction24/02/20 03:42 AM
1

If you are as good looking as you say just use the Tinder. Get enough experience in getting laid with easy girls on the first date. Then you will feel more confident. Also, even if you are a Hollywood superstar you still wouldn't get most girls you cold approach. Because more often than not girl would be not interested not because you aren't good enough, but because of her own circumstances.
/r/seduction23/02/20 05:00 AM
4

Read the comments and listen to the audio. The guy was a journalist at the Washington Post. And male feminist...and he is still now. Quote from comments: ""I see the list as a net positive" He deserves to clean toilets for the rest of his life. " Basically the guy still believes the waman even after being accused and he thinks that most other guys in the "offender list" are guilty, even though they are in the same situation as he is. Another comment quote: "Janitor is a big step down from being …
/r/MensRights23/02/20 04:55 AM
1

Just lol. What facts have to do with hate? I'm completely fine with women having casual sex. I just understand that those women aren't wife material. It is as simple as this. Any man who is experienced enough with women knows it. Only desperate guys eager to get laid with anyone would be so protective of girls with high number count. You aren't understanding simple fact - women who are suitable long-time partners aren't interested in having a lot of casual sex in the first place, not interested …
/r/seduction23/02/20 02:56 AM
1

Em, not really. It depends on that you mean by ugly, really. Moreover being attractive to women isn't all about your looks - many above average guys struggle to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:31 PM
28

One of the top answers in comments: Dear Andrew. Thanks for your tweet. I stopped killing women and children based on your inspiring words. You are a hero. And thanks for donating your balls to our local golf club. Got more likes than the post, lol.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 01:25 PM
18

Congratulations, brother. I've heard that the world-record for a man not killing any child or woman is exactly 3461 days. Maybe one day you'll be able to achieve this as well.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 01:22 PM
16

You don't understand. He is a man and he stopped killing children and women, so he thinks that all other men should do the same(assuming that it is what all other men do as well)!
/r/MensRights22/02/20 01:19 PM
17

Do you understand that such phrases imply that doing "X" is related to being a part of the group? Being a redditor has nothing to do with being angry, being a man has nothing to do with killing children. In comparison, saying "all gays should stop fucking men" would be more understandable because fucking men is related to being gay. It would be offensive for the other reason - because it would imply that doing X is bad. But no one would be offended by the fact that someone assumes that having se…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 01:17 PM
3

I would add that many men aren't interested in banging girls below 5/10 and aren't good enough to get more attractive girls (without paying the money) and so give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 12:57 PM
1

Em, do you understand that for most guys getting laid has nothing to do with romance? Most guys would prefer to be FWB with many attractive girls without any strings attached rather than being in LTR with one of them. And of course, romance is out of reach, traditional romance like in Disney movies or in classic literature is possible only if a girl is an innocent virgin and then you would be the first and the last of her partners for the whole life. Lifelong love between destined soulmates, yep…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 12:55 PM
5

Yep. Statistically, the more attractive a woman is the less casual sex she has.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 12:44 PM
0

Sorry to disappoint you, but this is bs. https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R-WhB9g9eYk/TJDSr8V_ShI/AAAAAAAAAOg/VmMGTymAVcI/s400/teachman ​ Both divorce rates and satisfaction of the marriage depend on the woman's partner count. Women with high partner count usually start to settle when they are past their prime and no longer as attractive as they were. Then they find some loser who wouldn't care about her sexual past and would sponsor her. Of course, it is good if he is stupid enough to not caught her …
/r/seduction22/02/20 12:16 PM
-7

Most guys wouldn't want to have LTR with a promiscuous girl and for a reason. There are multiple statistics proving that a girl with high partner count is more likely to cheat, less likely to be satisfied in LTR, have trouble with pair-bounding, etc. Why should you settle for a girl, why invest your emotions and resources in her if other dudes were able to get sex/emotions from her without any efforts? It is just the difference between a guy who is looking to get laid and a guy who is looking to…
/r/seduction22/02/20 05:59 AM
3

Slut-shaming isn't about having short-term sex or be sex-friends. It is about LTR. It isn't even "shaming", really. It is just the fact that guys who have enough choice would prefer girls who didn't fuck random dudes for fun. Because, unlike that OP said, most girls aren't interested in "just sex", but in finding a high-quality man to date. If they were interested in just sex then there would be zero reasons to be so selective about the partners, after all, you can't be sure about how good a per…
/r/seduction22/02/20 05:54 AM
4

Em, yeah. They would bone only about 70-80% of women who aren't too ugly.
/r/seduction21/02/20 05:39 PM
1

Em, it seems you don't completely understand what you are talking about... Evolutionary a woman needs two things - genes for her baby and then someone to protect her/provide for her when she is pregnant and a few years after. A good provider is someone who is ready to provide even BEFORE having sex. This is where the traditional dating system comes - a man tries to please a lady and when he proves that he is loyal she marry/fucks him. As about "genes" - looks are only part of it, on the other ha…
/r/seduction21/02/20 05:35 PM
1

Actually it isn't true. An average woman can have sex with as much quality men as she wants. Because most men aren't against having sex with someone "below their league". You probably can have sex with someone who is more educated than you, earns more and even more attractive physically. This is how women use Tinder in the first place. But what most women really want is to have a long term relationship with a high-quality man, not just being fucked for a while and then dumped. But a smart woman …
/r/seduction21/02/20 05:26 PM
-5

That being the case, men still can't be more likely to be killed by ex-partners just because men are much stronger on average. Also, why should a woman kill her ex if she could just make a false rape accusation?
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:14 PM
1

It is just the fact that statuary rape laws are outdated and contradict reality became more obvious when it is a woman who is older. The same thing could be said about the games/movies/porn age rating system. All of this assumes that teens never have sex and don't know about it before reaching certain age and if they do - it will affect them terribly. Most guys I know started to watch porn at 11-13 years old, it isn't out of ordinary, but a norm in the internet age. ​ By definition "age of conse…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:12 PM
2

This is bs logic because in stealing, vandalizing and killing only one side enjoys the process. For example, if someone consents to "stealing" then it isn't a crime anymore, it is a gift.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:04 PM
0

This is bs though. A lot of people start to have sex at 14-15 years old. Some at 13 years old or even 12 (I know such a guy, guess what - he is very popular among girls). 16 is the average age if all age groups included (30+ years old virgins as well). In the internet era teens often know more about sex at 12 than 25 years old knew 50 years ago. I would say that at least 80% of teens already watch porn/masturbate starting from 12-13 years old. I would say that, on the contrary, guys who were una…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:00 PM
2

Most women want to have healthy relationships, so yeah, they do.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:49 PM
1

I can understand your concern, but you should learn about the accusation statistics first... The total number of rape accusations isn't too big at less than 0,1% per year, yearly there are about 140k rapes reported in the whole USA and there are about a hundred million people who have sex regularly. It is unknown how many of those accusations are false, it may be up to 50% if you are being negative, but of all cases reported to the police only about 5% result in a conviction. So yeah, verbal con…
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:36 PM
1

Probably you are watching more mainstream anime for younger audiences. Do you understand why they consider it funny when a girl hits the guy though? Because for Japanese it is obvious that women are weak like children, so when they hit the guy it is like a small dog bitting the elephant - so it serves as comedic relief. Like little baby hits an adult. More often than not a violent girl is small and harmless and a guy is strong and doesn't care about her little amount of power.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:44 PM
4

Ass-kicking women in anime are there for the fan-service so that Japanese guys could see hotties fight. Ass-kicking women in western movies are there to make people believe a delusion that women are physically as strong as men are (biology disagrees) to make feminists feel better. This is why ass-kicking women in western media are almost always Mary Sue. And in anime they lose to fucking tentacles...oops, it is about a different type of anime...
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:00 PM
0

" Except the school system existed well before child protection laws, and child protection laws came well before the united states education system was hardcore publicized. " And it is bs, alright... Please check when exactly the age of consent was raised to 16 or 18 in most countries/states. Hell, in South Carolina it is still 14 (unless you are a teacher, then it is 16). Eh, I assume I should really link it after all... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States You are…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 07:19 AM
0

Yeah, it seems you just think that you are the smartest person in the universe...and think that you know actual neuroscience just because you are psychology student, just lol. I guess I should crush you with facts and logic just for fun... " It does not, it means most people have sex at 16. That's what an average means." I assume that math isn't your major... Minimal age of losing virginity would be 12 years old - it is just 4 years below an average. Maximum age of losing virginity...isn't reall…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 07:19 AM
0

Or STD...
/r/seduction19/02/20 05:36 AM
0

Maybe you don't know, but the average age of losing virginity in the USA and most other modern countries is 16. Even if all incels and 30 years old virgins are included it is still 16, it also means that a lot of people start to have sex at 13-15. I got my first gf when we both were 15 and one of my friends got his first gf when he was 12 and his gf was 13, and yeah, they did what the couples do. And I was definitely old enough to fuck 30+ years old women and would be glad to. I can't see anythi…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:49 AM
1

Having sex with 16 years old doesn't make you pedophile (someone who is attracted to prepubescent, i.e. 10-11 or younger) or predator. It just makes you a stupid person who either doesn't know the laws of your state/country or stupid enough to not move on to the state where it is legal. BTW, in many states, it is legal for anyone to have sex with 16 years olds unless they are the teacher - so basically you can have sex with high schoolers even if you are 50 years old pervert, but only if you are…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:55 AM
-1

Em, what? How many female teachers were sent to prison for breaking this law? More than enough.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:28 AM
-18

I disagree with the teacher's problem though. In most other countries outside of the USA, those teachers wouldn't be judged in the first place for having sex with fully consented 16-17 years old students. No guy would consider himself a "victim" if he was able to bang a hot adult woman while being in his mid to late teens. The same thing if genders reversed - if a girl was lucky enough to date her older high school crush she wouldn't consider herself to be a victim. Only crazy feminists would te…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 05:43 PM
17

The problem with posts like OP's is that not chasing part is right, but they also say shit like " and they will magically appear on your door step." and it is just delusional. If you aren't chasing women then you should actively CHOOSE women. I.e. meet new women and check if any of them are good matches for you and meet your standards. Most women are passive and rarely initiate contact even if they like the man. Moreover, for most guys our awesomeness isn't obvious from just a look alone, you ne…
/r/seduction18/02/20 05:29 PM
2

You think that just because a site belongs to university every post there is a fact (including personal interpretations of the author) even if there are zero citations in the post itself? What neurologists mean by "brain still develops" is exactly Synapsis Pruning, do you think I left the link about it just for fun? Moreover, what they mean by "still develops" could as well mean that those parts of the brain are 99% developed and then the last 1% develops slowly up to 30 years in some people. An…
/r/seduction18/02/20 05:21 PM
2

I think it is stupid to be proud of something you put no effort to achieve. Being proud of something you were born with is idiotic no matter what this quality is. Straight, gay, man, woman, black or white - doesn't matter. Be proud of something you actually achieved with your own efforts.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:21 PM
1

Why there should be any disagreement about the fact that men's rights should be protected? Or disagreement with the fact that they are often violated? Both statements are obvious facts, there is literally no reason to disagree.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:18 PM
1

But actually it does. If you were able to do something once, you can do it twice as long as you make enough attempts (unless it was pure luck and it wasn't, as getting girls isn't completely random). Him getting one girl means that he is attractive enough for her. It obviously means that he is attractive enough for many other girls as well.
/r/seduction18/02/20 04:14 PM
2

You can't know if the girl is "one" if you have no one else to compare. Unless you have already established standards and the girl meets them all. And this isn't OP's case at all.
/r/seduction18/02/20 04:11 PM
2

I'm so tired from seeing this stupid myth being repeated over and over again... Technically human brain doesn't stop its "development" until you start aging in your forties. But, all brain regions are already developed and completely functional in most people at 16. All brain regions that are related to sexual attraction developed even earlier - in the first 1-2 years of puberty. This "25 years old" myth comes from this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synaptic_pruning That is basically your abili…
/r/seduction18/02/20 04:03 PM
0

You actually do. Because there are some complications in raising the kids together if you aren't married to each other. In most countries, as a man, you aren't fully considered a father of the kid if you aren't married to his mother. Another reason why men marry is that most women want to have the financial safety marriage provides to them, more often than not it is the ultimatum, like "if you don't want to marry it means you don't trust me and don't love me!", all such bs.
/r/seduction18/02/20 04:00 PM
1

Em, you said to not marry a girl under 25, it means to avoid girls who are younger. And your explanation is the complete opposite of it.
/r/seduction18/02/20 03:50 PM
1

And how it contradicts in any way to the comment above yours or to the study? Women do emotional cheating so they care about it the most and assume that the man does the same. If it weren't the case then men cheating would be much more socially acceptable than it is now. Most women can't understand what men can just bang a girl without emotionally caring about her. Unless a girl is hypersexual she wouldn't be able to fully understand the difference between emotional and physical attraction.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/20 03:45 PM
1

Also, if this cavewoman is hot enough she would be able to find someone else to take care of the kid anyway. And if she is already married then the problem is solved by default... BTW this is probably one of the reasons why milf porn is popular among teenagers (you can see it from pornhub stats) even though milfs have lower SMV than younger girls. Younger guys don't have enough resources to take care of the kid, but older woman is supposed to be capable of doing it either by herself or with hubb…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/20 03:42 PM
1

Those who used lube most likely were just frigid (isn't rare for hookers) or girls who have a naturally low quantity of the lube. Have you really checked them for wetness BEFORE having sex? After proper foreplay? It is virtually impossible for a woman to not become wet after proper foreplay unless she is frigid. If you were complimented by some girls for your body then it is just ridiculous to assume that other girls felt zero attraction. It wouldn't work even if genders reversed - if a girl is …
/r/seduction16/02/20 03:12 PM
1

Lol, no. Bro, there are multiple studies that prove my point, just google "bonobo porn women" or any other porn study with women. There is no correlation between the physical excitement of a woman and the physical appearance of a man. They more react to certain situations, than visual cues. Even a lesbian can make a straight woman wet, it isn't even a joke, but a fact, proven by multiple studies you can easily find online. Before starting to get laid consistently I fucked 10 hookers, no one of t…
/r/seduction16/02/20 01:31 PM
0

Ever heard about hookers? Women, who fuck random strangers for money? Do you want to learn one little secret from them? Ok, here I go - any man, no matter how old or ugly can make any woman (unless lesbian or frigid) wet and horny. Any man no matter how old or ugly can make a woman cum if he has access to her body and the right skill. Men and women aren't the same. The sexual attraction isn't the same for men and women, period. The reason why you can't fuck most women aren't because they aren't …
/r/seduction16/02/20 03:15 AM
2

You haven't even seen this woman, she could very much be someone you would consider unfuckable. This is why the looks scale exists in the pua community. Confidence is how you get the maximum out of what you already have.
/r/seduction15/02/20 04:24 PM
1

Such a guy probably exists somewhere in the world, but first of all, probably less than one man out of a few thousand would be 5'2, it is at the level of disability and 99,99% guys aren't like this. You sure should be at least normal and not disgust a girl from the first sight, but everything else is more about game than anything else. And the game isn't necessary "techniques and tricks" PUA use, it could be your charisma, high self-esteem, confidence, social skills, strong frame - whatever you …
/r/seduction15/02/20 04:21 PM
6

You just thought that the sex itself is something amazing, much better than masturbation, but it is not. Sex in the condom is a downgraded version of fucking fleshlight in terms of what your penis feels. You chased sex for the sake of validation and now you are close to understanding it and accepting it. You also should know what to make sex amazing is something you both should work on.
/r/seduction15/02/20 03:10 PM
5

Yep, you entering her frame with PUA, you are faking yourself to get her approval, to do what SHE wants, while a real man should pursue his own interests, he isn't chasing women to get laid, he is choosing women to find the one who is good enough for him. And this is why PUA doesn't work well. It would be the other case if it actually worked consistently, but it isn't. ​ Another thing though, is that when you actually put a woman on the pedestal and then get her, you will feel much more emotions…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/20 02:27 AM
1

This isn't a problem though. Who cares if a girl leaves you in a few months if you can find a new one within a few days? The problem is that PUA isn't even effective enough in the first place. Directly inviting a girl to your place to watch Netflix within the first minute of a conversation would be more effective than actually following the PUA routine as long as you have some basic confidence.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/20 01:41 AM
8

Elon was already emotionally and financially abused (idk about physical abuse though) by his ex-wife, so he probably MGTOW already, lol.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 05:27 AM
14

More often than not truth isn't coming out or does way too late. This guy already got social repercussions for something he didn't. The same way Johny Depp was. If a woman says that someone assaulted her, then people would be like "believe the victim!!" and just side with her even without any evidence supporting her claims.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 06:17 AM
83

Rather than that...make her feel CHOSEN. What you choose her among other women for whatever reason. But she also should understand that you can change your choice if she didn't live up to your expectations. Her being somehow "special" is just one of the reasons why you choose her. But it doesn't mean that she wouldn't lose her place if she fails to deliver.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/20 06:20 PM
30

And the funny thing is - the large part of society will tell you that the first woman is an "independent woman with high self-esteem", while the second one is "a girl with daddy issues with no self-respect". Even though it is the other way around, lol. And if you have a certain age difference between you, then you would be considered a predator who manipulates a poor girl to make her your slave.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/20 01:07 PM
1

Second case isn't harassment though. Even if a man said something like this, it wouldn't be a real case of actual harassment (even if some people would consider it as such). Sexual offers aren't harassment unless they are repeated after rejection. By the same logic youtubers who "prank" strangers by offering them sex (those vids have tens of millions views) or kisses should be considered mass-harassers, but they are not.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 09:12 AM
1

I talked about working situation, not a bar or a club.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 09:08 AM
7

They will just make it so only men could be reported. It is probably their plan in the first place.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:22 PM
12

There is a chance that it can backfire though. If more people get affected by false harassment accusations then those accusations would be less and less believable, to the point that companies and society as a whole start to ignore them altogether. In the first place, real sexual harassment like grabbing someone's ass out of nowhere never happens in real life. Even things that "really" considered SH by feminists and a large part of society - sexual compliments or comments, unskilled flirting, et…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:20 PM
19

You can try to report them as a woman who is harassed by other women. On the other hand, you can use this app to get rid of male competition.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 03:42 PM
1

Lol, your ignorance about evolution and history of humanity is beyond laughable. Do people become kings based on their muscles and faces? Do people become army generals based on their muscles and faces? Both answers are - fuck no. They get their role either by inheriting it or by their skill at social interactions and commanding ability. You become chief by being a leader, you become the coolest guy in your class by being a leader. You can destroy someone with words alone. One person's physical …
/r/seduction07/02/20 11:15 AM
1

Let me tell you a secret. Status is always number 1. And it wasn't added in the recent time, it always was the number 1. And it isn't about having a good work or whatever. In ancient times the chief of a tribe (or his son) was always the most desirable man to fuck even if he was ugly. The most popular guy in class is the one who fucks all hot girls at high school. And guess what? Social status determined by your behavior in social settings, especially if a girl isn't from your social circle then…
/r/seduction07/02/20 10:55 AM
-1

Em, the actual goal for most people is to enjoy their life for as much and as long as possible. To have a fulfilling life. Hedonism is the problem only when it affects how long will your life last or hurt others in some way. In all other cases, people exist for the sake of pleasure, because by default pleasure is just another word for "behavior programmed by evolution". Being in monogamous LTR is beta, there are many guys here on RP who have LTR who is fine with them banging other chicks. Someti…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/20 10:36 AM
1

Sexual selection in humans is much more complex than that. If you really think that looks are the main or even only quality which matters to women, then you are really ignorant about evolutionary biology. Even for other primates, it doesn't work this way, let alone humans.
/r/seduction07/02/20 10:20 AM
1

More likely that he just isn't interested in getting the gf in the first place. Why would he? Getting a gf means that he either should stop meeting other girls or doing it in secret. A lot of women date guys of lower social and economic status, it isn't so uncommon. Getting gf is in general much easier than getting a one night stand.
/r/seduction07/02/20 07:34 AM
1

The looks matter the most when you have nothing else to offer.
/r/seduction07/02/20 07:32 AM
1

But the latter half of the book actually about techniques and logistics, lol. Have you read only the first half of it?
/r/seduction07/02/20 07:23 AM
1

No, people are punished by downvotes and rewarded by upvotes. The same way most online games are built around the concept of punishment and reward. It seems you can't understand that on the fundamental level punishment and reward are very basic concepts and mean anything that can be considered as a desirable or undesirable outcome of any situation. Only this meaning could be appropriate in this context because no one in PUA world advocate for physical punishment or some other type of abuse. When…
/r/seduction05/02/20 05:15 PM
1

But it actually does. The whole voting system of Reddit is based on punishment and reward. It is the next level of irony to say something like this here. Here, get your punishment!
/r/seduction05/02/20 03:05 PM
0

What makes you think that "punishing" someone's post or comment is a good, healthy way to make a popular site? Oh, stop, but aren't we are right here, on the sub which prospers based on this whole idea of treating humans as if we are Pavlov's dogs? Here, you got the answer. No matter if you do it consciously or not, but when you interacting with other humans you are always rewarding or punishing them in one way or another. By giving compliments you reward them, but by frowning you punish them. W…
/r/seduction05/02/20 03:03 PM
3

I think that those "tips and tricks" aren't needed to just executing them, but they needed to understand what exactly makes a man attractive and why. Just learning them not enough, you should understand why a man would do something like teasing, push-pull, qualification, etc, naturally and not just to get a girl in the bed using tricks he learned online. You should understand why someone would do all of that and how they think while doing it. And then make this your own thought process. For exam…
/r/seduction05/02/20 02:43 PM
0

No, actually it is not easier. Most PUAs have a lower success rate at the beginning than actually just offering girls sex from in the first minute of the conversation. It takes them a lot of time to get at a decent level because faking is always harder and you wouldn't be able to perfectly fake it in the first place. This is why naturally attractive guys or those who achieved a similar level of attractiveness through the understanding of the inner processes, have much higher results with less am…
/r/seduction05/02/20 02:40 PM
5

Its the other way around though. At the beginning of this sub, the content was almost fully about being PUA. Most popular posts nowadays are either like this one (which wouldn't be even a little bit helpful to most guys), or "Oh, I talked to a female stranger for the first time and she smiled instead of calling the cops! I'm so happy!". PUA isn't effective and the outer game is shit, but they actually make guys take action and try to improve by giving them simple to follow instructions on what t…
/r/seduction05/02/20 02:37 PM
1

Ok, Stanford is a joke, source links on the wiki are jokes, only you are the most intelligent person in the world, but of course, you can't make even a single argument based on logic or science, it is below you.
/r/seduction05/02/20 02:18 PM
1

I'm pretty much sure that your two master's degrees have nothing to do with biology. I would even assume that they have nothing to do with any natural science in the first place. Maybe it would explain your ignorance about evolutionary biology. Also, Wikipedia by itself isn't credible. But it's credibility comes from the source links you can find for everything said in it. Anyway, everything I said in this post even exists in said wiki, just with different wording. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
/r/seduction05/02/20 06:11 AM
5

Em, it is me, or both guides are rather shitty? Even a guide to friendzone a girl says that you should tell her about your ex-gf, about other girls you want to fuck and make her realize that she is shit compared to them, lol. Very nice indeed. But of those guides are toxic.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:57 PM
74

What is terrifying that even after knowing the whole story there are many people who will side with a female abuser. They will excuse her actions in whatever way they could.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:35 PM
0

Maybe it was the case before the Age of Porn. In the last 20 years, most teenage guys watch porn all the time while growing up and guess what - there aren't any "girls of your age" in porn, mostly girls in their twenties and milfs. Also, preferring some age groups is different from being disgusted by them just because of a number in their passport. If a woman keeps herself in decent form and uses makeup then she would look much younger than she really is. It isn't about perversions, it is rather…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:09 PM
-1

IDK what kind of bullshit you are talking about, but one of the most popular porn plots is the teenage guy who fucks MILF. Just check the most popular vids on a pornhub. It is the top 5 of the "porn plots" alongside incest and cheating. When I was anywhere from 13 to 17 years old I would be grateful to god if I was able to fuck more or less hot 30-40 years old woman. I would even prefer such women to those of my own age because I wanted someone experienced. All guys I know were more or less like…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:13 PM
21

Depending on the country age of consent is different. It is really subjective and rather random bullshit. In some countries, it is as high as 21. So, 20 years old full grown-up woman is still can't be fucked by someone who is two years older. In other countries, 13 years olds are completely legal and have the right to fuck and to marry anyone. From a biological and historical point of view, the latter is closer to how it was through the history of humanity. The reason why the age of consent beco…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/20 11:51 AM
9

It isn't about rape though. It is about abuse. Amber was an abuser, not a rapist. Most guys are agreed to have sex with an attractive woman by default, so to rape a guy a hot girl first needs to find someone who isn't DTF. Most women find being raped by someone attractive hot too. It isn't about your gender. It is one of the most popular sexual fantasies and the reason why 50 shades were so popular. When you are agreeing to have sex with someone inside your mind (which is the case with those peo…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:30 AM
46

I would say people think like this only when a woman is hot. If a woman is fat and ugly then most guys would assume that she can rape someone without them enjoying it at all. Also, most people think that if a man is physically stronger then he can easily resist. Though this is true in most cases, as a man, you can't use violence against women without risking your freedom. Even in self-defense. If you hit a woman when she tries to molest or rape you then no one will believe it. You would be just …
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:21 AM
1

Yeah, and it is exactly what I said. But in society in which you would die unless a man you choose is loyal, needy and "creepy" to the point that he is ready to wait for sex for years and wouldn't leave you no matter what - you have a high risk of not surviving. Throughout the history women were always dependent on men and were unable to survive without someone who sponsored them, it is just a fact. And in such circumstances, you will rather be with someone not attractive, but safe. Also, I expl…
/r/seduction01/02/20 03:40 AM
2

Everything in the world could be explained by science. My post was the answer to why exactly it happened and everything I said is based on evolutionary biology and 100% based on facts.
/r/seduction01/02/20 03:35 AM
1

Pretty much all dangerous STDs are already curable, even HIV/AIDS can be "frozen" by medications, so yeah - you can.
/r/seduction30/01/20 07:34 AM
-2

This link is about safe abortions at early stages in modern western countries, which, as I said, are almost completely safe. Google different types of abortion pls.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:36 PM
-2

Well, this all depends on what types of abort we are talking about. If it is about early and safe abort - then it is almost 100% safe, so I would even say that a man should have a right to choose this type of abort and, if a woman disagrees, he should hold no responsibility for the child. But unsafe and late abortions are much riskier (definitely riskier than the pregnancy itself), but the main risk isn't life-threatening, obviously, a woman risks complications in future pregnancies and possible…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:49 PM
-10

The problem here is that abortion isn't 100% safe yet. There are significant health risks in doing an abort. If there weren't any health risks then men should have had the same right in deciding abortion. Why a man should pay for "her decision"? Unless he was cheated into becoming a dad (i.e. pregnancy scammed when she lied about being on the pills, having a safe day, or if she used defective condom knowing about the defect) then the responsibility for contraception was on both of them. It was h…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:46 AM
9

It depends on the financial aspect of the situation. The partner who earns/works less should do the chores, it is just common sense. In most cases this partner is a woman, so yeah.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:36 AM
6

This is not true at all. In modern Russia/Ukraine the vast majority of women work. They both work AND take care of kids and chores. In exchange, the husband usually using the car, doing some "man work" (our people aren't very eager to delegate manual tasks to professionals) and, more often than not, works/earns a little bit more. I know some families who have only one working parent, but they are all Muslims. I know more families having a woman who earns more than a man. It is just that the reas…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/20 04:44 PM
8

I'm from Russia and I was 56kg the same as you when started lifting(at 171cm). I tried going to a gym for 1-2 months a few years ago, but with no much results. But now I gained 13kg (28lb) in half a year without much fat (3-4kg in the first month), just by following a different training routine. There are no hardgainers, just unsuitable training routines. Google The RLD Strength Training Routine. The thing is - if you are small and skinny, then you should train less, no more. I changed his routi…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/20 04:36 PM
5

Of course, the course would be focused on male artists. There are multiple reasons for that: Throughout history, only people of "high class" (born of nobility and rich enough) were able to get an education and enough free time to do such "unnecessary" things as art or science. But for most noblewomen it was even more unnecessary, they were just a "bonus" to their husband and, basically, never lived a life of an adult, all their life was sponsored either by parents or husband... chosen by parents…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:07 PM
3

I actually agree with you about not having a facade. And, in fact, most of the pickup and techniques is counter-productive. Pickup is about "faking" qualities of high-value man. High-value man - isn't necessary who is objectively high-value (i.e. physically attractive, high social status, charisma, etc), but someone who considers himself as such. When you value yourself highly, then you become naturally attractive to women. And trying to manipulate women, using tricks and techniques is low-value…
/r/seduction26/01/20 11:29 AM
5

I would add that actually commanding a girl with words is important. Domination should be verbal, not only physical. Also, many girls are really into being verbally humiliated and bad mouthed, dirty talk is always important, but it should be discussed beforehand. Sex is more an emotional than a physical process. To get a better picture of the emotional aspect, I would recommend the Sex God Method book, you can find it for free as well. That being the case, it is still a very good guide about the…
/r/seduction26/01/20 11:21 AM
1

Are you really reading the models? Bro, unless you are from a Muslim country or India, then forget "marriage before sex" rule. Being good with girls is a number's game. Girl determines if she is sexually attracted to you or not within a few minutes-hours of talking to you, after that you can't change it. Years of friendship wouldn't make her sexually attracted to you, it just doesn't work this way. The same way years of friendship wouldn't make you attracted to a girl you consider ugly. You can …
/r/seduction26/01/20 10:49 AM
1

OP said that he is " We are those marriage before sex people. Don’t judge. " so this advice wouldn't be helpful to him, lol. Also, I'm pretty much sure that any "marriage before sex" girl would always look for potential relationships. Most likely OP is just delusional. There is nothing that could help him until he changes his worldview to be more aligned with reality. Well, unless he is from some very conservative Muslim country where casual dating doesn't exist, but then again, nothin from this…
/r/seduction26/01/20 10:45 AM
9

Eh, so she wasn't found guilty even after all the accusations and evidence? It is fucked up.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 10:25 AM
3

This vid of Todd is who knows how old. He looks much younger in it and rather skinny. I would say that this vid of Todd is close to being 10 years old, so I don't even know how they were able to find it in the first place. Also, surprise - but anyone would be cringy when they do a cold approach without much experience while coming from a needy mindset (which is reinforced by outer game theories). The problem is - people treat it as if being cringy or trying to get laid with strangers is a terrib…
/r/seduction26/01/20 10:18 AM
1

They shouldn't believe. They should investigate without believing anything. No one cancelled the "innocent until proven guilty" rule.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 03:35 PM
3

That being the case I think what the right road is not to believe any victims no matter their sex. Law should never be about beliefs, it should be about evidences and proofs.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 02:41 PM
10

But overall I think this whole pickup thing is based on the idea that women can be seduced to invest in something they dont want , while that can be true I dont think it's a routine i dont think it's a few words said I think its alot more random than that Exactly that. This is why pickup and seduction aren't very effective. I googled daygame statistics of all famous PUAs who were honest enough to share it and 2-3 lays per 100 approaches is considered high amongst them. Guys who aren't PUA, but j…
/r/seduction24/01/20 06:50 PM
18

The thing is - trying to change a woman's opinion is low-value behavior at its core. High-value man has no reason to try and change someone. I would say that Todd is the closest PUA to understand how high-value man act AT THE OUTSIDE. This is why many resonate with him. But trying to act high-value to get laid is very different from actually feeling yourself high-value man. And, obviously, your results would be much worse.
/r/seduction24/01/20 06:34 PM
1

Instead of changing the things that make you unattractive - which are mostly your inner view about interacting with women, you try to imitate those who are attractive. It isn't an honest signal, you are just faking it. And it doesn't work well. Instead of being attractive you try to imitate being attractive. And it doesn't work well. Most people will see through it. You will fail tests without even realizing. " Most beginners will get ZERO results, unless the girl decides on her own she likes hi…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/20 09:27 AM
2

My point is that the "game" doesn't work, it is just a fact. It overcomplicates things and makes your learning curve much higher. The vast majority of guys who "learn the game" don't even get your level of results. You yourself are already in the "top 10%" among guys who learn about the game and try to get laid. Most guys can't approach women consistently, let alone get laid. Because for most guys getting nowhere 98 times out of 100 wouldn't be worth it to get laid once, it would make them compl…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/20 02:42 PM
0

Bro, you said it yourself that your stats are worse than 2-3 girls out of 100. You are getting laid not because of your skills, guys without skills have the same or higher success. You are getting girls thanks to the spam approach. Even with a 2% success rate if you approach 10 girls a day then it would be 6 girls a month. Though it would be considered work, because the success isn't always decided in the first few minutes, it is possible that sometimes you will waste hours on one girl just to f…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/20 07:35 AM
1

So you are just discriminating against other women because, by your standards, men under 25 are trash? It is the same if I would try to make it illegal to fuck women who weight over 200lbs and say that men who attracted to such women are sick psychopaths who should be in prisons. ​ Secondly, guys who don't lose their virginity until they are in their 20's are called incels and 99% of them want to fuck starting from being 11-13 years old kids. Men and women aren't the same, we have a strong libid…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 06:13 AM
3

It is wrong to say that it "worked". It was just wasn't bad enough to fuck up everything because she was attracted enough to be ok with this shit, lol.
/r/seduction19/01/20 07:01 PM
1

Uahaha, this is most hilarious shit I ever read. I would tell you a secret - but most people start to fuck and drink when they are 14-16 years old. Vast majority of them don't become incels or alcoholics. Alcohol and porn aren't the problem. Those people ARE problem. They are either lazy and stupid, or have had some traumatic experience which made them run away from the reality. Fucking your hot female teacher isn't traumatic experience, it is even better experience than having a teen girlfriend…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 06:34 PM
1

Because it isn't rape or pedophilia, stupid. Please read the definitions of the words you use. Even with genders reversed it would have nothing to do with pedophilia or rape. It has all to do with stupid "age of consent" laws in the USA. In most of the world age of consent is 16, somewhere it is lower. Setting this age to 18 or higher is ridiculous from a biological point of view. Also, it isn't "popular belief", it is just a fact that it is harder to get laid for a man. If you don't like a woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 06:25 PM
1

I'm an adult and I tell you - it is ok. You are just forcing your morality to others. Sorry to disappoint you, but not everyone is religious zealots believing in purity, marriage or whatnot. Some people actually know biology and how it works in animals, which humans are, btw. Fulfilling someone's need isn't "taking advantage". Young guy+older woman is a "win-win" situation. When a young guy fucks young woman it puts a lot of pressure on him - he should be the one who is "more experienced", the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 06:21 PM
2

Em, sorry to disappoint you, but being a pervert is the biological norm for men. It isn't something that changed because of porn. You are reversing the cause and effect. By nature, healthy men have a strong libido and desire to fuck all more or less attractive women they see. It only changes when a man enters in relationships and start to develop feelings for his partner. Also, the vast majority of men start to watch porn starting from they are 11-13 years old, it is very common and not somethin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 06:12 PM
0

What it has to do with sexual abuse? 90% of 16-18 years old men would be more than eager to fuck a female teacher as long as she is hot enough. Or, rather, not too ugly. And if she is too ugly - no big deal, the average woman has a physical strength of 12 years old boy. BTW, the remaining 10% would be gays and weirdos. There are no such scandals in most countries because the age of consent is 16 in most parts of the world, which makes total sense from a biological point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 06:06 PM
2

The problem with the daygame is what most women you approach are either in no mood to talk to a stranger, too shy or afraid of you... though more than 1/3 of them would be just taken. Everyone would be doing daygame even if it was just a 3% success rate (i.e. approach to lay), for most guys it is less. With 8% you would need to approach 10-15 women on average to get laid once, it means that you would be able to fuck a new girl each day 7 days a week easily.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/20 06:00 PM
2

There is a small percentage of women who are sluts and who enjoy having casual sex with any more or less attractive guy. The same way there is some small percentage of women who would be desperate to find a decent bf "right now" at the time you approach. There is also a small percentage of women who would be very into you just because you look similar to their father, past lover, or just because you have good compatibility in pheromones. The thing is - about 10% of women would be "easy" targets …
/r/TheRedPill19/01/20 05:51 PM
1

You mean it as "too many" or "there should be much more"?
/r/TheRedPill19/01/20 05:31 PM
8

Treating daygame as some sort of science makes those daygamers ineffective. Just check their stats and compare them to stats of someone who approaches women naturally. For example, goodlookingloser used the most basic approach to a daygame and got laid with about 8 women out of 100. All those "super tactical daygamers" (kraiser, torero, guy from the link, etc) have average statistics of laying 2-3 women out of 100. Because they overcomplicate things and, as a result, their frame becomes weak.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/20 05:07 AM
1

How much effort you use to get sex depends on your standards and level of attractiveness. People, both men, and women use a lot of money and time to attract the opposite sex - it is our nature. How the cost of the nightclub can make a man "emptying his wallet" though? And what it has to do with health and dignity? It is just a basic level of putting effort. Complaining about "discrimination" in nightclubs is the same as complaining about "unfairness" in prostitution - female prostitutes earn dec…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:23 PM
8

Sorry to disappoint you, but there are many more men than women who go to nightclubs. Because men want to get laid more than women want to get some attention. Men and women aren't equal when it comes to sex. It is harder for a man to get it and this "discrimination" helps a lot to make male/female ratio at least a little bit more bearable. It isn't like there aren't "equal" clubs, just they aren't popular. If it was me, I would definitely go to a club where more women than men. The perfect place…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 09:06 AM
-9

What is wrong with men to try to get laid and how it makes them cucks? There are many more men who are interested in casual sex with random strangers than women, so male/female ratio is rather bad for most nightclubs. I would rather go to the club with "discrimination" which has more women in it, than to a "fair" club with 80%+ of visitors being male. Men pay to nightclubs for the chance to get laid, not to be in the club, lol. Men and women AREN'T equal when it comes to sex, it is in our biolog…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 09:00 AM
1

It isn't about being superior to others. It is similar to the relationship between a parent and the child. Parents are above the child in the hierarchy, parents take care of the child and child should respect his parents and, to some extent, obey them. Biologically relationships between a man and a woman were similar to that - man was responsible for protecting his woman from others and for providing her with resources, while a woman was responsible for giving sex and taking care of the children…
/r/seduction16/01/20 01:24 PM
14

The thing is - value is subjective. And people decide your value based on your behavioral patterns. It is just instinct for any social animal, including humans. This is especially true in the context of seduction when you and the girl don't really know each other much and are from different social circles. If you are a handsome millionaire with an attractive body who travels around the world and you will approach a random girl and directly tell her those facts - she wouldn't jump on your cock. O…
/r/seduction16/01/20 01:12 PM
1

When people (and me) said that they "gained muscles" it doesn't mean "lean muscle mass", it means lean muscle mass + water. As I said - I didn't gain much fat. What exactly percentage of gains is lean muscle and what is "water" - it isn't easy to determine, because a significant part of the gains isn't actual muscle fibres, but sarcoplasmic fluid. You can count sarcoplasmic fluid as either water or muscles, but either way when you gain mass it isn't only "lean muscles" and "fat". I, obviously, g…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/20 06:43 PM
1

My statement is based on science. I never heard about anyone who was able to gain 10-15 kg in half a year using high volume training (without steroids). High volume training is good for your strength because it allows you to make better neural connections between muscles and the brain. But it is bad for muscles' growth because of that - it makes your muscles overtrained almost all the time. This is why there so many people who "can't gain muscles" even after training for a year. If you haven't g…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/20 11:14 AM
10

And the worst thing is if she is just a little bit crazy then this will evolve into "after-sex-regret" and it could lead to rape charges. Which, most likely, would be proven false, but it will give you a headache and could affect your social life as well. Moreover, when she asked him "answer me" - it was a frame of command. Why you should obey her and answer her honestly and seriously? It isn't about keeping the girl at all costs, it is about holding frame to the end.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/20 01:40 PM
1

There are two life-hacks to avoid this. First - you can make her beg you to fuck her. Basically, instead of doing something sexual to her you tell her to do something sexual to you or ask you to make her feel good. But it works if she really really wants you and already sort of submitted. Second - you can make a "safe word" she could say at any time if she is uncomfortable. Without a safe word, any BDSM practice would be considered a form of abuse. Also if you have sex with a new woman then ther…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 01:27 PM
96

Technically being drunk doesn't cancel your ability to consent. By law, you also 100% responsible for your actions while being drunk - for example if you driving while being drunk or kick someone's ass no one will say that you were "unable to consent for your own actions and so is innocent". Unless a person was passed out completely (i.e. unconscious) then they are responsible for what they do while drunk. Including having sex with someone. Even if they were "blackout drunk", which only means th…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 08:27 PM
5

There is no reason to go more days though. Unless you are pro-bodybuilder on steroids there you wouldn't gain much by increasing frequency of training. I gained 13kg of muscles (almost no fat) in half a year by training half a hour 2 times a week. More training doesn't mean more gains.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/20 08:05 PM
1

For most guys though it would be unrealistic to expect that women will initiate everything themselves just because of them having muscles. It isn't enough. To get girls easily with your looks enough you should be handsome, athletic and not too short, your race will play a role too as well as your style. In other words, you need to be a "full package" looks-wise if you want to get girls just by existing. The guy who is 8/10 would get ten times less attention than the guy who is 10/10 and from low…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/20 07:59 PM
1

Em, I'm pretty much sure what most guys would be more than glad and attracted if a hot girl throws herself on them. Some would be repulsed, but only because they will think that she is a slut or just making fun of them. It isn't unattractive for a girl to be "needy" or dependent on a guy. Men and women are different. Being a "nice girl" is attractive, being a "nice guy" is not.
/r/seduction10/01/20 02:39 PM
5

I will surprise you, but there a lot of guys who have passion and purpose, who are successful in career and have hobbies, but still can't get laid consistently. Girls are attracted to guys who are not needy, but you still should make conscious efforts to pursue girls unless you can meet a lot of them naturally with hobbies/work (and if you choose work/hobbies with the purpose of meeting girls - guess what, you are making efforts). Simply put, girls don't like guys who give a fuck about what exac…
/r/seduction10/01/20 02:36 PM
6

Have you ever heard about sarcasm and exaggeration?
/r/TheRedPill01/01/20 02:47 PM
4

Honestly, at first, I thought that she is Sasha Grey - her avatar pic is just too fitting.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/20 06:26 AM
2

You are wrong though. The woman can divorce-rape multiple men and be taken care of by the government which will force those men to pay. In the modern western world, divorce-raping men and getting alimony is a more effective strategy money-wise.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/20 06:23 AM
6

But of course, it is! What man get in the marriage? He gets her pussy, it means he could fuck her every day if he wants (???). Statistically, the average personal prostitute takes 300$ per hour if the man can fuck his wife for two hours every day as any real man should - it means 600$ per day x 365= 219000$ he earns just by being able to have sex with her! What a profit! The average person in the USA earns only $31,099 yearly - 7 times less. So even if we just use the math - married men get so m…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/20 06:21 AM
1

In my message I didn't talk about "rejection" when approached by a girl. IDK why you assumed otherwise. Please re-read the context. In other thread I already said that guys will reject the girl because they are wary, uncomfortable, too busy or taken. This is why daygame have rather high percentage of instant rejections - not everyone is receptive to it. When I was in my teens I was 2 times kind of approached by a girl, but I played it "cool" and somehow "rejected" girls both times, lol. You feel…
/r/seduction31/12/19 06:26 PM
1

Your reply has nothing to do with my message though. I talked about situation already after banging a girl who cold approached a guy directly.
/r/seduction31/12/19 04:03 PM
16

It is staged video, relax.
/r/seduction31/12/19 01:39 PM
3

She is super awkward just because the situation is uncomfortable for her. She isn't like this with people who are comfortable with her. Instead, most guys wouldn't date a girl who just offered sex for them because it goes against the image of a perfect girl we have. If she decided to have sex with you without knowing you at all it means she has a very low threshold and probably did it with other people, i.e. she is a slut. And most guys wouldn't want to date easily available girl.
/r/seduction31/12/19 10:54 AM
33

Even with confidence and game a lot of people you will approach in daygame are just not interested, too wary of strangers, too busy, or taken. Girls don't have difficulties because they don't need to take an initiative in the first place. Girl in the video doing this only... well for the video. It isn't like they are really interested in those guys or consider something with them, or have any need to actually do it. Any average girl has more dick offered to her than she could take.
/r/seduction31/12/19 10:43 AM
2

The age of consents doesn't mean that underages aren't prepared for sex, because they ARE having sex, a lot and legally, just with other underage people. And consequences are all the same - be it sex with someone of your own age or someone older. In fact, there is a higher chance of unwanted pregnancy when underages have sex with each other. In some countries, the age of consent could be as low as 14 or 15 and it doesn't affect anything in a negative way. On the contrary, the countries with a hi…
/r/MensRights31/12/19 09:15 AM
2

What the point of relationships when you need to work for them constantly under the threat of being discarded? Lol. You should be better in relationships than without them. You contradict yourself. If you don't put a girl on the pedestal then why would you put a show to get her like you? You wouldn't do any shit like that, instead, you will make HER doing the things for you. If you can click with a girl naturally, without doing any specific efforts to make her attracted, only then there is any p…
/r/seduction31/12/19 05:25 AM
1

Em, what? Having a crush on someone is a very high level of attraction when you already dream about dating the other person and already 100% sure you like them a lot. People go on dates to get to know each other better. Fuck, nowadays people have sex to know each other better. Going on a date is just a small stage and requires a much lower level of attraction than having a crush on someone imply.
/r/seduction30/12/19 04:38 PM
1

The law of attraction is bs. What works is the law of action. It doesn't matter what you think if you do nothing. And it doesn't matter what you think if you take the right actions.
/r/seduction29/12/19 01:55 PM
1

Bullshit. Certain behaviors and vibes can make a girl more attracted to you and other behaviors and vibes can make her lose initial interest completely. How you hold a conversation can affect the results more than your physical attractiveness or initial impression. A lot of guys get ghosted by the girls who were initially interested. The typical standard for the conversational ability is much higher than just not saying anything "crazy". You can get the girl by your looks alone only if there is …
/r/seduction29/12/19 01:49 PM
1

Em, the girl can consider the guy attractive enough while not being interested in relationships with him, casual or serious. Considering someone attractive and being interested are different things.
/r/seduction28/12/19 01:49 PM
1

Em, how exactly this is incompatible? Flirting is your strongest "weapon" in the daygame.
/r/seduction27/12/19 03:55 PM
5

Having kids isn't rp goal? It is something that most people eventually do. Being without kids when you are in your fifties/sixties will make you feel really lame. If you want to have kids and family then inexperienced clingy virgins outclass sluts by a mile.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/19 03:34 PM
-1

You are assuming as if she would flirt with guys she considers completely unattractive. I never ever encountered such a situation. For both sides flirting means that "you are kind of attractive, but I'm not sure". It never means "oh, I like you so much, let's marry".
/r/seduction27/12/19 11:33 AM
1

You might think, well if you flirt with everyone then it doesn't mean anything and people you actually like won't be able to tell the difference. The way to avoid this is by being more obvious or coy when you flirt with people you actually like. Em, the whole point of flirting is to be NOT obvious. Flirting works when the girl isn't sure if you really seriously like her or just playing around. When the girl is 100% sure what you like her a lot then your attractiveness level falls tremendously. U…
/r/seduction27/12/19 11:31 AM
1

The most attractive guys, obviously, get the girls who have both looks and personality. It should make sense that appearance and personality aren't necessarily mutually exclusive traits.
/r/seduction27/12/19 11:04 AM
1

Only until she gets what she wants from him, be it validation, relationships or marriage. Then she will show her real personality which is - being a selfish hot girl. And some girls are just too stupid to fake even this...
/r/seduction27/12/19 10:56 AM
1

Personality is a more subjective thing than physical attractiveness. It has nothing to do with shit "objectification". It is about the sexual market value. It is obvious what sexual value of a woman depends on her appearance because often guys should decide if she is worthy of their efforts even before talking to her. Men are programmed by dopamine to pursue physically attractive women, it is basic biology and not objectification. Sure, long term relationships are more complex than just biologic…
/r/seduction27/12/19 10:55 AM
1

Well, I would say that if a girl, magically, has max points in everything, but 0 either in personality, body or face then she would be much less attractive than the girl who has the same number of points, but balanced stats. Also, 24 out of 40? Really? :(
/r/seduction27/12/19 10:50 AM
1

There is nothing about seduction though. Just some simplified basics about how emotions related to hormones, which is something that anyone more or less educated should know. The practical value of this information is close to zero.
/r/seduction27/12/19 10:41 AM
1

Show me 17 years old guy who never watched porn with adult women in it.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 03:43 AM
-1

Yeah, it is just feminists logic. Have you ever heard about public baths? I was in a public bath and I have seen many naked men (some of them really ugly) without consenting. Some of them are probably gays as well. In some countries there are shared public baths, i.e. men and women alike bath naked. No one bothered. So it is just a cultural thing. Modern west is obsessed with consent while this concept initially was used only to direct actions, i.e. touching the person inappropriately or committ…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 03:42 AM
-10

It is absolutely trolling. There was a post about pizzadare just today and there is, suddenly, a victim right here? Probability would be super low, it is hundreds times more likely that it is trolling. Also I never ever met any 17 years old guy who would consider himself "too young to see adult woman's private places" or consider himself a "child". It is just unrealistic shit. Only at least 25+ years old people can consider 16-18 years olds "just small kids". And those are probably were late blo…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 05:38 PM
2

If you are minor then she would be considered sexual offender by law.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 05:31 PM
1

You assuming as if men and women have completely shared interests, while it isn't the case. Logically the girl wouldn't want to emotionally depend on a guy and chase him. She would want the guy to chase her and to get as many benefits from him as she can while not giving much in return. Girls don't know what exactly makes them "fall in love" with someone and even if they know - they wouldn't tell you because it would give you the power over them. But yeah, sometimes girls will tell you something…
/r/seduction25/12/19 03:38 PM
1

Fair point... we don't need to know what women want, we need to know what to do to get what WE want from women. He asks what women want because doing it is expected to give him what he wants. And, obviously, you should take advice from the guy who already getting what he wants from women (as long as it is the same thing you want from them as well). And as a result, this guy would know what women "really want" better than the women themselves. It isn't necessary would be what they think they want…
/r/seduction25/12/19 01:57 PM
3

And the advice the deer would give you - hey, stop hunting us poor deers and please be nice to us and give us free food. Amazing advice for the hunter, yep.
/r/seduction25/12/19 01:53 PM
2

My 17 years old friend once fucked a 25 years old teacher. Is he a victim? Fortunately, my country is less retarded in terms of "age of consent" laws so no, he is just an attractive dude who was able to fuck a teacher. Not a victim of evil predatory woman, lol. Another adult woman in her thirties was recently gang-raped by a group of 14-16 years old boys. She should be in prison, right? Please stop copying the feminists with their stupid logic about sexual crimes.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:18 PM
1

The problem here is what the reaction mostly depends on the person's attractiveness. I.e. if the girl is hot enough - most guys would be glad that she did that, if the guy is hot enough - most girls would be glad if he did that. Check this for example. https://www.reddit.com/r/pizzadare/comments/ebmpqj/my_first_pizza_dare_oc/ She linked the message from the guy. Or check this: https://www.reddit.com/r/18_19/comments/e3tle1/thats_one_lucky_dude/ Read comments - the guys say that they want it to h…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 08:42 AM
2

One guy? There were countless guys like this.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 06:19 AM
11

LOL. By this logic, there is no multimillionaire who can have consensual sex with any woman unless she is the top-level model, actress or daughter of another multimillionaire. Power imbalance has nothing to do with consent unless the person in question uses this power to blackmail someone. Having sex to get benefits doesn't fit the criteria of being non-consensual, it fits the criteria of prostitution. It is still illegal, but for completely different reasons. Consent my ass. Consensually sellin…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/19 06:04 AM
2

To me, it seems like a very good way to achieve overtraining unless you are experienced athlete or on steroids. I personally gained almost 30 pounds in half a year(almost without fat) doing almost the opposite of this program - 2 days a week, low volume program. And even then - after doing the bench press until failure just once it wasn't enough for me to completely return to the peak in 2-3 days. I believe this program can be good for a semi-professional bodybuilder on roids, but it would be ju…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/19 03:57 AM
2

You should be high value for yourself, not for women. For women, the facade is more than enough. It isn't like you need to ignore them until you become really high-value guy.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/19 05:56 PM
7

Being able to see the political consequences of one's actions and words is a part of being competent as well. It just means that in current circumstances you should be competent in politics as well if you want to succeed in finances.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:43 PM
0

You can detect it by checking the level of her investments. If the girl often initiates sex (and down to anything, including doing you anilingus), if she is ready to pay for you and making expensive (for her) gifts, if she is terrified only from thought of you leaving her - then it is likely that she wouldn't divorce you 2 months after the marriage. Usually, red flags are out there and most guys don't even try to "check" the girl for the green flags I mentioned. You should marry the girl only if…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:54 PM
1

No, he made a mistake of marrying someone at all, especially at his age. Or marrying someone before being sure that they are really invested in him. Marriage is a financial contract and you should know beforehand what type of consequences it could have. In most western countries you shouldn't marry anyone at all.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:48 PM
91

They don't appoint someone because they are men. They appoint someone because they are more competent than 99,99999% of other people. I'm a white man, but for some strange reason, I wasn't appointed to be the governor of the Bank. Maybe because I'm not competent enough for this work? The question should be - why there weren't any black transgender lesbian woman who was more competent than him? Because if such a person existed then they would be appointed instead of Bailey! For some reason, peopl…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:35 PM
2

You see, if they can't arrive in Moscow then it is meaningless. Like I said, the east part of Russia is a big shithole without anything in it and with extremely harsh weather. Even if Japanese conquered it - it would be useless and Stalin wouldn't even care about sending soldiers to defend it. And then they also would be left open for the America to conquer Japan effortlessly as well. Japanese never intended to attack Soviet Union, their main enemy always was the China. Pacific Islands and South…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/19 04:01 AM
3

Well yeah, Lend-Lease policy. Supplies are important, but human lives are priceless.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/19 12:11 PM
1

It has nothing to do with the past though. Currently, the USA is the strongest military nation and other countries borrow its military power in exchange for political power. The Soviet Union lost the cold war and modern Russia is just not strong enough to counter-balance the USA. China can do it, but it doesn't care yet. WW2 was almost exclusively won by the Soviet Union and China, it is historical fact. The Americans and the British didn't do much other than preventing the Soviet Union and Chin…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/19 11:27 AM
2

You are wrong. The east of the Soviet Union back then was just a big cold space of nothing other than forests and snow. There was no way for the Japanese to arrive in Moscow from there. Japanese were at war with China if you didn't know. Chinese lost ten times more soldiers in WW2 than the USA did, the Japanese just didn't have a chance to get distracted. Please learn the history, China and USSR won the WW2 while everyone else just helped in the end when the victor become obvious. https://en.wik…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/19 10:57 AM
4

You can be proactive without chasing the girl at all. Chasing happens when you already said to yourself "fuck yeah, I want her", but she isn't sure about you yet, so you try to convince her that you are good enough for her. It IS unattractive. Girls are attracted either when they can't figure you out and not sure if you are really interested in them or not. Or when they know what you ARE interested in her, but you can lose your interested at any moment if she did something wrong. When the girl f…
/r/seduction21/12/19 01:05 PM
2

Nah bro, you are delusional as well. There is no "law of attraction", it is unscientific bs for lazy people. There is a Law of Effort and a Law of Knowledge - this shit is real. As long as you have the right knowledge and make enough effort - everything is possible, as long as your circumstances aren't too fcked up. Thinking about success will only make you less motivated because you already got your endorphin boost from imaginary success. You are just a creation of evolution and all your though…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/19 12:26 PM
1

Em, have you read the article? Almost in all countries marked "red" it isn't illegal to buy a prostitute. For example my country, Russia, is marked red, i.e. prostitution is illegal. But, in fact, it is just a joke. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Russia It isn't illegal to buy a prostitute. And a fine of 1-2k (15-35$, lol) rubles for prostitution is a joke as well because any one of them takes at least 2-3k per hour. In practice, only pimping is really illegal. And most of the "re…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/19 12:14 PM
1

Lol, the most honest puas out there who post their real statistics from the daygame. Check them out for yourself. https://krauserpua.com/2016/01/02/my-2015-daygame-stats/ https://project-tusk.com/blogs/the-tusk-diaries/realistic-daygame-statistics ​ 50%? Good joke, good joke. For daygame 2-3% is a high statistic, at least for guys who think like you and try to use pickup methods (if you are naturally attractive then 10-15% rate isn't impossible). We expect to sleep with girls the same night beca…
/r/seduction19/12/19 03:57 PM
7

It is me, or ugly women (like this one) are more likely to make false sexual assault claims? Like, it makes them feel good that people believe them that someone was attracted to them enough to become a criminal for the sake of feeling out her body. If I heard that someone sexually assaulted this woman I would laugh pretty hard and wouldn't believe it at all.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:04 PM
5

It is easy to understand when you explain it, I assume not everyone considered that you get paid 1,5 more for working overtime. Because, on practice, it is rarely happens, lol.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 10:07 AM
11

That being said, there are just more competent men in high paying jobs as well. Most successful businessmen are, well, men. On average women are just either not interested in the business, or less competent than men. It doesn't mean that any man can be a successful businessman, no, just both the number of those who trying and % of those who are successful are leagues above. The same goes for many other high-paying professions which are HARD and women are just not interested to do them or get edu…
/r/MensRights16/12/19 10:00 AM
3

You missing the whole point of modern feminism. He was a guy. It means he was a rapist by definition. Raping the rapist isn't the crime, it is the justice. Like in "social justice warrior". Amy was brave enough to go against society and to rape dangerous criminal (accused of being born male), so they applauded her for this brave feat.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 06:21 PM
1

She should have asked for your consent before talking about shit. It could make you uncomfortable. She isn't even close to really practicing the consent in a True Way! You were mentally violated by hearing something you never wanted to hear from her.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 06:16 PM
5

How shit can "fizzle out"? Lol. If a girl is fine with you touching her, kissing her, etc (you don't need to tell her you like her to do that) then you just inviting her to your/her place and escalate more. Telling a girl that you like her is completely unnecessary and counterproductive because it ruins all the mystery. BTW I'm not from the USA, but from the Russia and this holds true even here. I talked to some "psychic" whose work was giving love advice to both men and women. Guess what - almo…
/r/seduction14/12/19 05:19 AM
10

Em, what you say is contradicting what he said though. He is still shit with women even after improving all other areas of his life. The same way you can be a mess in life and still get laid like crazy. Those things aren't directly related. Having a fulfilling life sure helps with girls, but it is just a very smart part of your attractiveness. The same way a girl can be a drug addict with a big debt, but as long as she is hot there would be countless men begging for her attention. Being attracti…
/r/seduction14/12/19 05:13 AM
3

"This thread has been locked by the moderators of r/datingoverthirty" So it seems that even women over thirty have it easy, lol. I remember how I created fake FB account of a beautiful woman and made just one post in some "say hi" group . After that I got about thousand friend requests and countless messages from men from over the whole world.
/r/seduction14/12/19 05:06 AM
18

It is probably simpler than this. You should ask this woman how many guys she swiped right herself before she met those. Most likely it is about 5 out of 100. And girls have different tastes so that 5% isn't necessarily the same guys for every girl. Maybe her taste is very different from other girls. But yeah, even hot guys have it much harder on Tinder than the average woman.
/r/seduction13/12/19 04:02 PM
2

You only proved the whole point of the post. This guy you "rejected" can get many women chasing him - it is exactly what most men want. Not to get any specific woman. Also, it would be more credible if you said that "never in my life I was with a player time guy". But you probably were when you were "young and naive". But most guys are fine with getting "young and naive" girls, some even prefer them.
/r/seduction12/12/19 02:56 PM
3

What exactly considered as "being an arrogant asshole" out of everything OP said?
/r/seduction12/12/19 02:50 PM
8

If by "meaningful" relationships you mean marrying her (signing the financial contract which will make you obliged to provide for her even if she leaves you), having kids, be together for tens of years, etc, then no, thank you. The fact is - this "player vibe" is perfect if you want to have a lot of casual sex with submissive and feminine girls. It is called being a feminine, gentle and kind woman, not a "weak-minded girl easy to manipulate". Feminine women like to submit in sex and they like to…
/r/seduction12/12/19 02:48 PM
1

You shouldn't want to have something serious with a girl unless she already invested in you enough emotionally. If you start to consider relationships while she isn't into you yet then it will lead you to fail more often than not. It is she who should want to have relationships with you first.
/r/seduction12/12/19 02:35 PM
1

Em, most guys wouldn't enjoy giving a girl full control or at least enjoy it much less than another way around. Women who are strictly doms are rare and are out of the norm and most likely have some psychological issues. Because sexual hierarchy will translate to actual relationships one way or another and most women aren't attracted to guys who submit to them. Sure, she can enjoy dominating you, but she wouldn't consider you a romantic interest and she will still crave someone who will place he…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/19 04:48 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with casual sex. And yes, fucking so many girls WILL make you happy, at least until you got tired from that. It is always better to have more money than less, it is always better to have more available female options than less, it isn't even a red pill, but common sense. It is up to you if you want to fuck all the women who want you or choose the best of them to have relationships. The perfect outcome, of course, would be romancing the best and most loyal out of them and s…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/19 06:53 AM
2

This stat is right because most of the HIV infected are people of the low social-economic status who do drugs and unprotected sex with random people. And being of low social-economic status and/or drug addict is much more common among the black population. It isn't like black people are more vulnerable to HIV.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/19 05:55 AM
1

Let's assume that 2% of women were infected, it would be 1/25000 chance of getting infected. They would need to fuck 25000 women on average to get infected. The main source of AIDs infection is the drugs, the second closest would be homosexual sex between men. Traditional sex is the least likely way to get infected even if you aren't using condoms and fuck every girl you see.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/19 05:50 AM
3

Statistically, the average man has 6 sexual partners in his whole life. While masturbating on hundreds or thousands. If you are unable to get laid with at least 4 new women per month then you aren't someone who can get laid easily. This is the case for more than 90% of men. You should be delusional to deny it. Just because you are able to fuck a girl from your social circle once in a while doesn't mean that you can "get laid easily", lol. Unless you can get a new girl within a week whenever you …
/r/seduction11/12/19 04:54 AM
-1

No, it is a sub for those who want to get laid consistently and not 2 times a year or by dating girls from their social circle. People who can really do it by default are rather rare. The vast majority of guys can get laid only after putting a lot of effort into it or by luck. Just knowing basics wouldn't get you anywhere.
/r/seduction10/12/19 04:56 PM
1

In most countries, it isn't a crime to buy a prostitute, while it is a crime to be one. It is ridiculous that women can make it look as if they are victims of prostituting themselves just because they get their reward in the other form. Being seduced by potential reward is different from being forced. Moreover, prostitution is mostly restricted by law because people can be forced to it (which is often the case in developing countries), but there is no real reason why the consensual exchange of s…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/19 04:41 PM
3

Which is bs. No matter how power dynamics play out there is always can be consent between two adults. Sure, the prison guard CAN force or blackmail the prisoner easily, but it doesn't change the fact that there is a possibility for consensual sex. Being in a superior position can't cancel out the possibility of consent. By this same logic jobless ugly loser can't consent to the hot model girl and an ordinary girl can't consent to young Brad Pitt.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/19 04:31 PM
1

The victim card is a cheat code because you can't blame the victim, never! It would be considering victim-blaming and you would be shamed by everyone. This is why women do their best to make themselves victims when they fck up somehow.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/19 04:27 PM
1

You know what? Most guys wouldn't like to be rejected or ignored, so you should stop rejecting or ignoring guys! You see, just because you don't like being approached doesn't mean that others have no right to do that. If there is a conflict of interests then both people are right in doing that is in their interest. Some people can consider what hitting on strangers is creepy behavior, the same way some people can consider that harshly rejecting or ignoring someone is bitchy behavior. But guys ha…
/r/seduction09/12/19 03:56 PM
1

Blogs prove nothing, actual data - can prove anything, as long as it is legit. You can find studies outside of blogs if you can google, often there are links in the article itself.
/r/seduction09/12/19 03:28 PM
1

Lol, there are no blogs with opposite data. All data from Tinder or any dating site available anywhere in the world prove only two points - your photos are 100% of success and that average men have it so hard it isn't worth it. You obviously never even tried to google this shit. You can check one of my older posts for more proofs.
/r/seduction09/12/19 09:50 AM
3

I think that you people missing the point. It isn't necessary that this discrepancy was due to sexual selection. But rather because of social/dominance selection. Women didn't have the right to choose their partners in most cases. Influential men were the law itself and were able to rape women if they want or to make them concubines by force. Hypergamy exists only when women have a choice. But through the history of humanity women didn't have much of a choice. In a monogamous society, parents ch…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/19 02:49 PM
1

Well, statistically there are much more bicurious girls and couples than actual lesbians, so it makes sense. Though IDK how exactly you could determine that a girl is lesbian IRL without actually asking her. In this way, it is still should be easier online.
/r/seduction07/12/19 02:33 PM
1

You missing one point though. Most women don't want quick lays, they want relationships. This is why most people date someone from their social circle. Statistically the hotter a girl - the less is quantity of her partners and less likely she has had casual sex. Statistically, hottest dudes and below-average girls have the highest amount of sexual partners. There is no much difference in real-life society, the average guy still can get average girl even if he doesn't have any game. What is hard …
/r/seduction07/12/19 02:30 PM
1

How it changes the fact that each of those articles is based on the actual DATA from dating sites? You can research on your own, but all data available tells you that 95% of guys wouldn't get any success on Tinder. You should either have very low standards or very attractive photos (like the top 1-5%), most likely both.
/r/seduction07/12/19 02:23 PM
1

If you have real standards then you wouldn't be DTF even if 10/10 female goddess approach you and offer you her pussy. It has nothing with being physically attracted to someone. Just because you want to sleep with a girl doesn't mean that you shouldn't have any other conditions.
/r/seduction29/11/19 04:46 PM
2

Yep, the only difference is - men expected to be both not fat and not skinny, but jacked. While for woman it is enough not to be too fat. Also, men don't judge fat women. Most of us are just not attracted to them physically. There is nothing you can do about it if you are just not attracted to fatties.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 04:28 PM
3

Men are picky? Think again. If you are woman then it is enough for you to be not too fat. It is easily achieved by proper diet and exercise even if you tend to gain weight easily. As long as you aren't too fat or way too ugly then you will have many men lined up to get in your pants. A man? Unless a man is in the top 5% of attractiveness then his looks wouldn't help him much. Being jacked is a much higher standard than just not being fat. And even so - it isn't enough for a man just to be jacked…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 04:25 PM
1

It is so hard for you to imagine what a man can approach her to know IF she is good enough for him or not and not to prove to her that he is "a good boy worthy of her"? You asking her out doesn't necessary means that you already completely approved of her and that she already did everything to make you interested. You can be and should be "a maybe" guy with some standards instead of being a DTF guy who is completely in the "yes" category from the start.
/r/seduction28/11/19 02:16 AM
4

Long-distance running is one of the WORST exercises ever. It kills your heart and your knees in the long term. Cardio should be used only as a warm-up and it is definitely not something you need to specifically train.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/19 11:51 AM
-9

You should make more research into this. Most cardio exercises are more hurt than help you. Your heart is working on 100% all the time in any case, you can't make it "stronger" by doing cardio.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/19 07:05 AM
9

Yeah. Real value women want is emotions you can give them. If you are able to make him feel strong emotions than any other value doesn't matter so much.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/19 07:03 AM
11

Your financial assets matter - they make you less attractive for short term hookups which is proven by multiple studies (some of them were posted here on TRP). Being wealthy means that a woman is more likely to consider you a potential husband and of course she would try to make you invest as much you can before agreeing to sex and will try not to be too slutty. If your value as a resources provider is bigger than your value than DNA provider then it could be detrimental to your success in getti…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/19 07:00 AM
1

You not being the needy little boy who is happy just because a girl said "yes" asked her on a date is something that you should actually become, not something you should "fake" to get her to like you. But "faking" attractive qualities is still better than being "real", but unattractive. Using makeup is worse than being naturally beautiful, but still better than having skin problems.
/r/seduction26/11/19 10:54 AM
2

His reaction and the fact that this post is so much more upvoted than the posts which try to provide an actual value - proves that most guys here put women on a pedestal. It isn't you should be "fuck yeah" when she says "yes", it is she should react this way when you offer to spend time together.
/r/seduction26/11/19 10:52 AM
1

Maybe you waste way too much time on step one. It should be the shortest one, at most 30 minutes unless you will meet her regularly anyway (like a coworker, classmate, etc).
/r/seduction24/11/19 06:16 PM
3

Nah, it doesn't work this way. What we call "connection" is a feeling of intimacy that is produced by hormone oxytocin and it takes a lot of time for this hormone to truly change how you treat a person. It requires having regular sex for a long period of time, talking a lot like you do with a friend, etc. It is a type of love you can feel to your family members or very close friends, but usually even stronger. We, humans, have a dual sexual strategy and both of those are preconditioned by how ou…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/19 06:19 PM
0

Based on your nickname you should be a Mod. You wasted so much of my time. I'm not your teacher at school to educate you about how our brain's work, I already proved my point and linked multiple studies which support my words. You offered only "you are lying!!!" like a little kid.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:14 AM
0

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25222339 I have no evidence? You need more studies or something? All evolutionary biology, neuroscience and countless researches are on my side. STFU if you are ignorant about any of it.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:53 AM
0

It seems your reading comprehension is way too low. You can restrict it, I never denied it, but you can't "control" it. As I said - you can become celibate if you want, you can become a monk and never fuck a woman again. It doesn't change anything. Monks lose their libido, the same goes for married men who don't cheat or watch porn. You can restrict yourself, but you can't make yourself excited. It works only in one way. By the way, most men actually do what you described - just in fantasies and…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:37 AM
0

You are right that we can go against our instinct. But sexual desire IS instinct and you can't control it. You can choose to be celibate, sure. But you can't make your dick hard and libido high by using your willpower. There are countless studies that prove that most people have sex less than once a month after 5+ years of being married. I'm sure you can find them just well without me. Coolidge effect definitely exists in humans like in almost all other mammals, just without human experimentatio…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:56 AM
-11

Sorry, but all humans of the same gender have same needs and desires on biological level. Well, not all, there are some deviations from the norm like LGBT, asexuals, impotents, etc. But healthy male's brain works the same way for everyone. And dopamine deficit is a real thing. Sorry to disappoint you, but humans are just another species of animals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect
/r/MensRights22/11/19 05:23 PM
-18

Funny, but this quote is close to the truth. If you don't fuck around or at least watch some porn while being in monogamous relationships then your desire to fuck your partner would be close to zero in a few years because of lack of dopamine which is generated by sexual novelty. And if you no longer fuck your wife properly then she would be sexually frustrated and more likely to cheat.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 05:06 PM
1

What is wrong with ghosting? It just saves you time. The problem of those guys is their neediness and not the form of rejection. I can't understand the point of your post. It is in the wrong sub. If you are caring so much about being rejecting and form of rejection then you are doing something wrong on the fundamental level.
/r/seduction21/11/19 05:26 PM
1

If you are doing everything right then there is no rejection in seduction at all - because you aren't "asking" her for anything, you OFFER her value and she either make efforts to get it or not. If you are coming from the right frame then rejection doesn't exist in the first place. It doesn't mean that you will fuck all the girls, it means that you aren't trying to convince them of anything, you just give them a chance and they either take it or leave it.
/r/seduction21/11/19 05:18 PM
3

Also, one cannot have casual sex without the benefit of civilization. Because you would always risk STDs and pregnancy. This is why monogamy was enforced in most societies throughout history and only people of highest standings like kings and emperors were allowed to have harems. Nowadays it is ten times easier to fck 100+ women. Why we should care about our caveman ancestors? We humans have sex to FEEL GOOD. The end of the story. So anything is fine as long as you take care of safety.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/19 11:38 AM
3

There are guys who have LTR which lasts for tens of years AND their woman is fine with them periodically fucking other women. It is how the perfect RP LTR looks like. When you need to hold down your sexuality completely and fuck only one woman for the rest of your life - you can't be truly satisfied unless you already lost the most of your libido. Because for men sexual attraction is very dependent on dopamine increase which you can get only with a new experience. A lot of guys solve it by watch…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/19 04:53 AM
1

Yes, but the thing is - you as a guy shouldn't be "dtf" immediately when you meet the girl. You should have standards too, it means that you aren't going to try and date a girl after knowing her for few minutes, lol.
/r/seduction19/11/19 05:57 PM
0

Eh, read my other comments. The reason I KNOW that visualization CAN'T possibly work is the fact that I understand what exactly it is on the biological level. Just processes inside your brain have no way to influence anything else other than your nervous system.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/19 05:39 PM
2

It seems you already at the point of escaping from reality. Good luck dude in your world of imaginary magic.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/19 05:07 AM
1

Nah, you CAN measure visualization, like any other thought process. You never heard about brain scans? Also, the placebo effect DOESN'T CURE ANYTHING. It just makes your brain ignore pain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo And yeah, process definitely real. It is the same type of process as digesting food. What you talk about is something like "food digestion inside your stomach can influence the outside world!" which is nonsense. The thought process inside your brain can't attract any shit …
/r/TheRedPill19/11/19 04:57 AM
2

Lol, what? You can conduct study for ANYTHING. Visualisation can help you by making you more motivated or disciplined, but it definitely can't affect outside world. It is obvious to anyone who knows what exactly is the thought process or imagination are. They are just processes inside your brain. There is no any way for them to "attract" any shit to you.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/19 04:35 AM
4

So you really believe that, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_DeVito ​ did have a problem to make girls wet or sexually excited about him? Most guys I know who have the highest success with women are below average in height. It is just a fact that your height doesn't make a girl "dry", unlike how fatness makes dick limp. What I say isn't "shit", but actual facts which I proved both with data and my own experience. How does it matter how old are those studies, people are the same. …
/r/MensRights18/11/19 05:38 AM
8

Nah, incels would be the first who will tell you that your height and looks are everything and without being born Adonis you can't get laid. BTW, I only say facts. For women physical and mental arousal - not always related. https://magazine.utoronto.ca/research-ideas/culture-society/sexual-arousal-in-women-and-men-teresa-grimbos/ Anyone can make a healthy woman physically aroused, even another woman. And, to some extent, even bonobo sex. http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blancha…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:00 PM
1

This rule is far from being a universal trait. There wouldn't be so big racial difference in height if all women biologically preferred tall men. The facts are - depending on the environment being short can be more beneficial. In modern society, your height doesn't matter much at all. Overall there are multiple proofs of women's preferences being more socially conditioned - it is obvious because they need to choose someone who is well adapted to current conditions.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 05:51 PM
-15

Preference for taller guys isn't a sexual one, but rather social. The girl can become wet and enjoy sex with you just fine no matter your height even if you are below 5'0 or something. Just she want a boyfriend so what her friends were envious of her. A lot of guys just can't get a boner on overweight girls.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 04:58 PM
6

Statistically, the top 10% of women online go for the top 1% of men exclusively. And it is if we just talk about "swipes" - if we talk about chances of the actual meeting - it is low even for the best guys. And I think it should be obvious, but you can't become 1% man without good genetics and lots of effort put into your looks, social proof (i.e. being a minor celebrity) and photos. Also, I wish you aren't talking about "sugar daddy" apps, lol? For the western world, online dating nowadays is a…
/r/TheRedPill17/11/19 04:53 PM
7

I thought like this too, but then I checked out the actual statistic of rape charges. In most western countries the vast majority of rape charges are never making it to the court. On the one hand, it is easy to falsely accuse someone of rape, but on the other hand, it is hard to prove real rape cases. There is a contradiction. Just words alone can't be considered proof of the crime, but if circumstances are right then it is rather easy to commit this crime without leaving any other pieces of evi…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 01:55 PM
3

Loool... It seems you don't understand how muscles grow on the biological level. Pls read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_hypertrophy and this https://www.builtlean.com/2013/09/17/muscles-grow/ ​ Do you want to know why Arnold is one of the best bodybuilders? Because of steroids and genetics. "Individual differences in genetics account for a substantial portion of the variance in existing muscle mass. A classical twin study design (similar to those of behavioral genetics) estimates th…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 04:08 AM
5

I worked out without the help of any bs self-hypnosis or other unscientific concept and gained 20lbs in my first 3-4 months of training, without too much increase in my fat%. Just by choosing the right training program and eating well. It isn't about being cynical - it is about knowing the basic biology of the human body. You can as well believe in "the Secret" or pray to God to make you bigger if you wish, but this is unscientific nonsense not backed up by any evidence. "Thought training" can m…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 03:22 PM
14

Sorry to disappoint you, but there is NO scientific evidence to prove that visualization works for building muscles. At most, it can make your neural connection to muscles better which can help beginners a little bit. But there are countless pieces of evidence to prove that there are certain rules to your training following which you can improve gains tremendously, like by 30-50%. Also, gaining 40lbs in 2,5 years isn't something too awesome, lol. Especially if you were in your teens when started…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 02:43 PM
2

Sure, but it doesn't mean that 5'6 guy can't get laid with hotties. It just means that he would need to put way more effort into it. The same way the average person would need to put much more effort financially than millionaire's son. Life isn't fair - your work is to adapt. Also, online dating is way too different from real-world interactions. Online women rationally choose the most physically attractive guys. There is no frame, no emotions, no real interaction.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 02:28 PM
2

You don't understand one critical point though. Getting girls for a guy isn't about being liked by every single girl he meets. It is about being liked by about 5-10% of girls while being rejected by everyone else and doing enough approaches so that it didn't matter anymore. You are going from a position of being the one who chooses guys, so you can't understand that for most guys getting laid with ANY physically attractive (to him personally) girl is a challenge. For many guys if they are being …
/r/seduction14/11/19 02:01 PM
2

You should rename your post to "SOME women don't like to be approached". I would say that most women would like to be approached by someone attractive, but wouldn't if it is someone unattractive. Those who are, like you, don't like being approached no matter what definitely exist, but they are the minority. Even if only about 10-20% of girls are glad to be approached - it is worth it. Because why would you care about the opinion of someone who isn't into you compared to someone who IS into you? …
/r/seduction14/11/19 01:39 PM
1

You don't have psychic abilities. If someone did that OP described then you wouldn't know that they are "playing games", the only thing you would know that someone forgot about you for a few days. Also, it seems you are missing the fact that a lot of guys, especially on this sub, aren't trying to find a "good healthy long-lasting relationship", instead we just want to have sex and fun without too much efforts or negative implications. Tests are usually reserved for this usually small period of t…
/r/seduction12/11/19 11:01 AM
1

Looking at someone's ass isn't a crime. Yet. Or it already is?
/r/MensRights12/11/19 10:52 AM
-2

Please for the god's sake - learn a little bit about evolutionary biology and neuroscience. Everything I said is based on current theories in those sciences and backed by a lot of data that you can easily find with a little bit of googling. You just trying to be a male version of the feminist. You can understand that long term relationships require A LOT OF more investment from a man, but why it isn't obvious to you that it exactly means that LTRs aren't the most beneficial sexual strategy for m…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 10:30 AM
2

Nah, I disagree. Fapping and watching porn everyday has no effect on your desire to meet girls, that is, if you are motivated by something more than just getting orgasms.
/r/seduction12/11/19 10:14 AM
-11

Are you joking, right? The reality is - men want more things than women. Men want BOTH a lot of attractive sexual partners just for sex AND meaningful relationships with someone special (this is why through the history men highest in hierarchy always have had their own harems with multiple wives and concubines). While most women just want the latter. It doesn't make them "superior" in any way, lol. There is nothing negative about having just sex with someone. You can deny it all you want, but it…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 04:34 PM
2

Not really. For a lot of guys "working on himself" often means that there wouldn't be any interaction with potential mates, like, at all. I know more guys who struggle with getting girls exactly because of their lifestyle than because of their neediness. You can be needy AF and chase women like a little needy bitch, but you still would be able to get a girlfriend or two from your social circle if there any. For many guys, the only way to interact with attractive women is actually to put consciou…
/r/seduction11/11/19 03:38 PM
2

But some guys do say this. Recently there was upvoted post like this right here.
/r/seduction11/11/19 03:34 PM
3

The only thing he advises here is to ignore a girl for a while to know if she is way too needy and clingy. Which is good advice because there are some crazy BPD women out there who can ruin your life if you give them a chance. It is surprising that you found it so strange because it makes perfect sense from a logical point of view. If you block someone just because they didn't message you for a few days then I have bad news for you.
/r/seduction11/11/19 03:31 PM
22

Teasing and challenging her - sure. "Shit-testing"? No. The point of shit-test is to find a reason to reject someone. Why you should do it?
/r/seduction11/11/19 03:11 PM
1

Heh. Woman who is in top 50% still would have more choices than a man who is in top 5%. Because men aren't choosy, we just have a "looks threshold", which is different for each man. Top 10% women only go for top 1% of men. But top 10% of men will go for top 30% women or more. Women try to get into the top 5% to get quality, not quantity. Because even absolutely average woman have more guys message her online than she can handle.
/r/seduction09/11/19 04:23 AM
1

It means that for whatever reason you are in the top 5% or higher. What else you expected? Most guys are bad at determining their own level of physical attractiveness if they are above average.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:34 PM
1

I never said that you get to the top of 5% just by being naturally attractive. You should be both more or less attractive by default AND do all this shit you did. You should win the genetic lottery, have decent body, have style, being able to make your photos look cool, etc. It is just to get matches, then you need to know how not to fuck up with your messages and dates. Even if you are model-looking, but your photos are shitty then you wouldn't make it in the top 5%.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:28 PM
2

Maybe you should read the actual study? Attractiveness was determined by objective criteria.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:25 PM
1

There are many other studies, some of them were linked under this post by thetahill user and have much higher sample size. It is just one of the studies which included the attractiveness of females as well. Every study about online dating will show you that only the top 5% of guys get likes/messages from anyone more or less attractive. Also, if those are just random women then the study is credible enough.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:25 PM
1

Sure, you can go from the bottom 20% to the top 50% or even 20% with the right photos, but it wouldn't change much as proven by many statistics. It is just not enough to get in the top 5% unless you won the genetic lottery, exercised long enough to become jacked, have cool style, lifestyle AND know how to make good photos. What you said is right, but it is just a minimum required to get at the top.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:24 AM
2

Maybe it would be surprising for you, but you can get laid outside of Tinder (and I do). And it was the whole point of my post. Also, by your shitty logic, no one in this sub gets laid at all, lol. Sorry, but being non-needy with women and don't care about getting laid isn't the same thing. There is a whole sub with people who don't care, but I don't think that MGTOWs are example of people who get girls easily.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:18 AM
1

It is actual data from the site. And you wouldn't be able to find any data different from that anywhere. Just because you said that you are 6 or 7 doesn't make you one. Also, maybe you have very different taste in women than most guys.
/r/seduction08/11/19 03:15 AM
3

An average girl can muster this number within three months though. Say thank you to Tinder.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/19 03:46 PM
2

IDK, there are many guys who don't have any serious problems other than not getting enough sex with hot enough women.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/19 07:47 AM
2

If it isn't sarcasm then IDK why you were upvoted here, lol. Most guys can't love an ugly and fat girl no matter how good is her personality. And vice versa. You aren't necessary need to be model looking, but at least work on yourself to stay fit and healthy.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/19 07:38 AM
1

Because the point of redpill is to choose the right partners. What it has to do with blaming other guys? Also, statistically, in most cases marriages are broken by women, so here you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 04:27 PM
2

It is something called social proof and it is discussed in pickup/redpill community to a certain extent. If you are the best dancer (for example - coach) in the mixed group of dancers, then women from this group would consider you attractive. But being talented/having a skill isn't something attractive by itself. You can be a professional dota player, but it wouldn't make girls attracted to you, lol. On the other hand, you can be below average surfer and it would help.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/19 04:24 PM
1

Em, you are wrong. Many people want toxic relationships to get a lot of emotions out of them. Those people ARE toxic and they choose partners who are the same. p.s. Honestly, I first thought that it was a guy's twit.
/r/seduction04/11/19 04:46 PM
2

People are different. There was a time in my life when for a few years straight I didn't have any girls and rarely meet my friends, but it never bothered me too much and never in my whole life I felt depressed. The thing is - life is "hollow" by default and you should to "fill" it with something important TO YOU personally and it doesn't matter what exactly is it. Social abundance isn't something people need by default, rather it is more like something learned - for example, you did have a lot o…
/r/seduction04/11/19 04:38 PM
23

Go and find 10 other girls. What is the problem? There few billions of them out there.
/r/seduction29/10/19 10:11 PM
1

You are very very wrong. Proof: https://qz.com/241479/okcupid-experimented-on-users-and-proved-everyone-just-looks-at-the-pictures/ In online dating no one gives a fuck about anything other than your pictures. Just because it is the only more or less real thing about you. Information proceeded through text isn't reliable and people understand it intuitively.
/r/seduction29/10/19 10:07 PM
1

Those best daygamers still have a statistic of like 2-3 lays per 100 approaches. Which is actually lower than statistics of some guys I know/read about who just invited girls to their place from the start. If your statistic is as low as 3% then it is hard to say if it is your game that worked or you got laid in spite of it. Just compare those stats: https://interpersona.psychopen.eu/article/view/121/html And those: https://krauserpua.com/2016/01/02/my-2015-daygame-stats/ https://mrwhitedaygame.w…
/r/seduction29/10/19 09:52 PM
1

You are right, but most girls who want to find meaningful serious relationships aren't trying to find guys on Tinder, or in bars/clubs - they do it through their social circles or hobbies. It is simple - because on Tinder you choose partners based on their physical appearance and it doesn't matter so much for long term relationships as it is for casual sex. And Tinder designed in a way that you choose people solely based on their photos which is, obviously, not very productive way to find a cari…
/r/seduction29/10/19 09:48 PM
1

Slim, face and skin without any defects, right proportions, etc.
/r/seduction29/10/19 09:42 PM
1

In online dating, you wouldn't get even one message without looks.
/r/seduction29/10/19 09:39 PM
3

How do you know that she didn't meet other guys just for sex before meeting you though? Also, it is rather normal to develop some feelings after meeting each other just for sex.
/r/seduction29/10/19 09:34 PM
1

Let me guess.. You are either an overweight woman or incel.
/r/seduction29/10/19 09:29 PM
1

It is not my judgement or anything. It is just are facts that asexuality (emotional impotence) is a form of sickness and that LGBT is perverted from the evolutionary point of view. I have zero intolerance to either group and I even have a gay friend. Also, you being ridiculous here. Do you think most men sexualize their blood-related mothers? Fuck no. Incest porn is mostly about step-mothers/step-sisters. And even if someone watches blood-related incest porn it doesn't mean that they are interes…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 07:59 AM
1

Because the more plates - the better.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/19 07:47 AM
1

Why you should marry anyone at all though?
/r/TheRedPill29/10/19 07:47 AM
1

Lol, what? Do you understand what in the vast majority of cases if you weren't able to fuck a girl from Tinder on the first date then you would be ghosted? It is fucking hook up app, silly. Not only you should touch her, but you should invite her to your place and escalate as far as possible. Even if she wouldn't have sex with you - if you two french kissed and touched each other hard then it is much more likely that you will meet each other again. I assume you either never got laid from Tinder …
/r/seduction29/10/19 04:34 AM
1

To get their model looking guy for a casual hook up. And you are probably not the one.
/r/seduction29/10/19 04:31 AM
1

Yeah, totally. 99% of success on Tinder is to actually get the date. It is rather hard to fuck up and if you do it means you either look much worse than on your photos or have rather low social skills.
/r/seduction29/10/19 04:30 AM
1

Em, maybe you missed it, but the whole point of the first date is to have sex on it if possible, let alone talking about sexual things. In 100% cases if a guy on a date with you he already knows that he wants to have sex with you (preferably as fast as possible) unless you catfished him. Moreover, this post about fucking Tinder which is a hookup app. If you was able to meet the girl from Tinder on a date then it is because she choose you as the best choice to potentially hook up with you. Girls …
/r/seduction29/10/19 04:27 AM
2

Most guys would rather fap on 8/10+ girls than actually fuck the overweight 5/10 one, let alone girls below.
/r/seduction29/10/19 04:23 AM
1

Unless you are 9-10/10 in looks.
/r/seduction29/10/19 04:19 AM
3

You can do it the other way around though. Instead of asking if you can touch her - you tell her to touch you, tell her that you want her to touch you. It builds up much more attraction and a more masculine and confident way to approach it.
/r/seduction28/10/19 06:23 PM
4

The difference is - most men want "loser" women as long as those women are hot enough. A woman doesn't need to be strong-willed, have high self-esteem or other positive personal qualities. In fact, most men prefer hot woman with low self-esteem who will put her partner above her. It doesn't affect our attraction to her, on the contrary, it could make it stronger. On average men want someone weaker than them, women want someone stronger than them. So if we say that TRP strategies only attract sub…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 06:09 PM
1

On the fundamental level dread game is an ultimate form of a man putting his boundaries. The whole point of the "boundaries" concept is that if your partner doing something wrong then you can leave the relationships. But if you just leave them and become pitiful loner then it wouldn't work so well compared to you leaving for someone better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 06:02 PM
1

Em, all risks you mentioned are both about men and women and, in fact, very arguable, moreover so if you use condoms. Good sex = sex good for both parties, so stop talking nonsense pls. Also yeah, a lot of women want to have sex or they are willing to have sex just for the small chance of relationships. If a man is good in bed then it is woman who benefit the most from casual sex, because her orgasms would be much more powerful than his, while, in most cases, she did much less efforts to achieve…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 05:50 PM
1

TRP "tactics" are about making women WANT to have sex with you and also how to make them enjoy it. And even if a sex wasn't enjoyable (shit happens) then it isn't like you lose much. But you again missed the good sex part - by definition good sex is mutually enjoyable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 12:26 PM
1

It would be manipulation, yes. But if you enjoyed the sex without any negative consequences - then it wasn't bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 12:24 PM
1

Manipulating someone into sex isn't bad. Manipulating someone into marriage - yes, it is sure predatory and terrible. Sex is a mutually enjoyable process, marriage is a one-sided financial contract. Know the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:56 AM
1

You wouldn't be manipulated because you have experience of being manipulated, lol. Not because you aged. This same 30 years old woman could easily manipulate some 40+ years old men who lack experience (for example if they were married for the last 20 years). Also, I'm pretty much sure that there are many younger girls who would be able to easily manipulate 18 years old version of you. Just because you become better than you were - doesn't mean that there aren't any younger people who are better …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:51 AM
1

It is false for modern society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:45 AM
1

So what? There are asexuals and those who have orgasm disorders. Among both men and women. Also, it seems you missed the GOOD SEX part.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:40 AM
1

It is a scientific fact that women enjoy good sex and orgasm much more than men do, so stop talking nonsense. There is a difference between enjoying the process and being programmed to actively pursue it. I never heard about a man who lost his conscious from the intensity of his orgasm. But I met more than one woman who screams like crazy and loses her control over herself. Women don't have a refractory period, have longer orgasms, have much stronger hormonal burst when orgasm, much more sensiti…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 11:38 AM
3

Asexuals are sick and LGBT are perverts, but there is nothing sick or perverted in what I described, on contrary it is natural and how it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 07:36 AM
1

Oh lol, so women now don't value orgasm and aren't interested in sex? Good joke. The thing is - most men just suck in bed. Also, men aren't in so much need to attain sex with you as well - there are porn and prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 07:33 AM
1

It means either they suck or you have problems with achieving orgasm. Though I assume it is more likely to be former.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 07:30 AM
1

Both for men and for women comfort, security and attachment aren't necessary parts of the sex. Which is mutually enjoyable process without real consequences in the modern world.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 07:29 AM
2

You don't understand. Guys like both sex with AND without emotional attachment. It is just not necessary part to enjoy the sex. Wanting sex just for the sake of sex is completely normal - both for men and for women. Still, you can see that it is more important to men, considering that women almost not interested in porn or male prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 07:28 AM
1

Depending on a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 07:25 AM
1

Maybe because some girls who go to frat parties go there to get drunk/drugged and fucked? So, of course, they will go back to those "rapists" again and again. Just because someone said that it was rape doesn't mean that it actually was rape, it is surprising for you that not all rape allegations are truthful? In fact, it is a victim who decides if sex was rape or not and funny enough - sometimes this decision is done after the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 07:39 PM
1

There is a big difference. There are TWO looks thresholds - for casual sex and for LTR. And the difference is - those thresholds are reversed for men and women. Men have higher standards in looks when it is about LTR and less standards than it comes to casual sex. Most women have rather low threshold for LTR, but way too high for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 07:31 PM
1

Yes, it should imply harm - by fucking definition. You can't call mutually beneficial behaviour predatory just because one side is more likely to initiate it. Searching for the work isn't predatory so is finding sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 07:06 PM
2

IDK, I know very few guys who are joke experts either. In fact, if I try to view it from an outsider's perspective then I'm probably the funniest guy out of anyone I know. Most other guys can't really joke, rather they only can shit test each other in a funny way. Like talking shit about each other without really meaning that. I can't imagine most women being able to even endure this sort of "rough" humor when you are so harsh to each other what you look more like mortal enemies than the best fr…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/19 06:54 PM
4

It depends on the country and society. Most accusations? No. A significant percentage of them? Definitely. But eventually it doesn't matter if they are fake or not - you can't imprison people without definitive proofs. It is about the whole foundation of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 06:48 PM
1

Dating someone just for the sake of good sex isn't abusive or predatory. Sex is a mutually enjoyable practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 06:43 PM
3

By definition, predatory means something harmful to the victim, but beneficial to the predator. I explained why in modern society man pursuing casual sex with many women isn't predator as it is beneficial to both sides. So what exactly I made up in my head? Or you just don't understand the meaning of the word "predatory"?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 06:38 PM
1

I disagree about your "most rapists are never convicted". It is just horseshit without any definitive proof whatsoever. When a real rape happens then there are traces left in the vast majority of cases - because victims are either drugged or physically abused into submission. Sure, it is somehow easier to make a "perfect rape" scheme than a "perfect kill" one, but most rapists are too stupid for that, because smart person understands that it is just not worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 06:30 PM
8

You are the exact demonstration of how exactly male sexuality is repressed. Men want to have casual sex with many physically attractive girls - it is how our sexuality works on the basic level and how are we designed by evolution and the reason why the porn industry is so profitable. We value sex just by itself, even without any emotional involvement in the process and sexual variety is a must for maximal satisfaction. And now people like you/society tells us that it is creepy. So, to avoid bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 06:26 PM
2

Can you explain to me how exactly giving a woman orgasm, making her experience the best time of her life is "predatory"? Women are more ridiculous here. Imagine that you are a great guy who just wants to make others happy, giving them free money. But, just because a long time ago most people who received free gifts were punished they consider you predatory. Nowadays, with condoms, contraception and modern medicine there is no real punishment for a woman for having sex, as long as she is cautious…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 06:16 PM
2

You forget that sexual relationships are just this - sexual relationships. If a young girl is naive/slutty enough to have casual sex with 50 years old guy then she is most likely naive/slutty enough to have casual sex with someone of her age. Also, you equaling casual sex to being swindled, lol. It is ridiculous. The vast majority of older men or women who fuck much younger ones just do it for two simple reasons - because younger people are less interested in LTR/family and hotter on average, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 05:59 PM
1

You are actually wrong. In Relationships Advice people shit on MILFs who fuck younger guys almost as much. All of this comes from the place of treating casual sex as mistake or equaling it to serious relationships. I assume if 40 years old woman made 18 years old guy marry her then it can be considered somehow predatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 05:47 PM
2

In reality she just can't fathom that most men aren't attracted to 200lbs women.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/19 05:26 PM
2

If you can get laid with other women without too much efforts then why not? You just change her position to a plate while fucking other girls and searching for someone better. Why should you reject the offer and lose a free cum-dump?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/19 05:19 PM
1

You missed the part about good game, are you? You can get hot girls with your charisma, but you would need a lot of time and efforts to develop it and even so it would take way much more efforts to make girls wet with your conversational skills - it is much easier to buy sex if you can afford it.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/19 10:07 AM
5

Well, you see... In general, statistically, the more hot the girl the less sexual partners she will have through life and the less she would be inclined to "just sex". There was a post on TRP about it with scientific proofs. So, to get the best girls you would need to put a lot of efforts even if you have high SMV. So you either make a lot of efforts or just buy that you want, like this guy did. For him - the price he paid is worth it. Pff, you really think that if a guy who, for example, earns …
/r/TheRedPill20/10/19 07:59 PM
4

If you wasn't someone who won genetic lottery then to get high quality girls you would need to put A LOT of efforts even if you have amazing body from going to gym. For many guys no matter that they do they never could be 8+ in looks. And girls mostly date up, not down. It means that if you aren't model looking guy then you can forget about the best girls unless you are ready to commit, have really good game, or... ready to pay like this guy. He can get girls below 7 thanks to his looks, but, at…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/19 07:53 PM
8

Non-whore site girl? Lol. In most countries in which prostitution is legalised it is much safer to fuck a hooker than normal girl. Why? Because if you use condoms right then the chances of catching STDs are almost non-existent. And a hooker wouldn't live for too long if she fuck all of her clients without a condom. And you would be way too stupid to fuck her without one as well.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/19 07:48 PM
32

That is much as I will get into it, but it is pretty clear that GQ is cucked. It took you too long to reach this conclusion. For me it was enough: " Americans who identify as male, female, or gender nonbinary"
/r/TheRedPill17/10/19 05:21 PM
1

IDK, from that I've seen in the video and comments he advises to "dump" the alpha guy who wouldn't commit anyway and to find a nice beta guy who will value and respect her, committing his emotions and resources. If a woman stops being promiscuous then it makes it much harder for her to make alpha interested - after all, he wouldn't want to waste his time on a woman who isn't DTF within the short time frame. So his advice is actually should benefit guys who are providers. Women being less promisc…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/19 05:11 PM
10

Lol? No, he just turned christian. " Does he forget he had her "riding" his motorbike topless 5 months after giving birth to their daughter on the 'Bound 2' video " Before that he never cared about all this shit, he married a slut because he wanted to marry a slut. But then his world-view, suddenly, changed.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/19 05:51 PM
3

This suck guys. Here in Russia where I'm pepper sprays are legal and some of them are more powerful than those used by police in USA. You can buy one for 5-10$. A good spray will make almost anyone unable to fight without doing any lasting damage to their health. It is quite funny that in USA you can legally buy lethal weapons, but can't get safe self-defence spray.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/19 05:07 AM
1

He never grabbed her though. He just touched her hand.
/r/seduction11/10/19 05:09 AM
1

I assume that if a big group of strangers just laughed between each other close to you and then called out to you for whatever reason then you would be scared as well. But it wouldn't be a crime in any way. Touching someone's hand or even waist aren't considered something sexual, you know? It would be different if he grabbed her and tried to restrict her with force, but it wouldn't be "sexual harassment", but rather assault.
/r/seduction11/10/19 05:08 AM
1

So? What he did is socially awkward, but not should be considered crime.. Also, he says that he only touched her hand, nothing about her waist. Also, please read last few sentences at the end of the news, they are just retarded.
/r/seduction11/10/19 04:56 AM
1

He didn't make a mistake though. There is nothing wrong with his actions.
/r/seduction11/10/19 04:51 AM
4

Touching someone's ass - sure, it is sexual harassment. Touching someone's hand lightly? No, it is fucking not.
/r/seduction11/10/19 04:43 AM
6

Em, actual researches (easy to find with google) proves that touching someone lightly while talking to them increases your likeability. The problem of this news isn't the guy, but the law which considers just TOUCHING someone's hand a crime. It is ridiculous. " 'It was quite a while - three to five seconds. He smirked at me, he didn't stop he just touched me and walked off and I broke down crying - it was quite traumatic." This girl needs therapy, she is mentally handicapped. And because of her …
/r/seduction11/10/19 04:33 AM
7

Imagine you are a guy and when you walk into a room literally every girl (including hot ones) is eye fucking you. Must be the best moment of your life.
/r/seduction09/10/19 03:25 AM
3

Em, I would say that 99% of guys would be more than glad to be approached by a hot girl.
/r/seduction09/10/19 03:24 AM
5

Maybe this girl was his Ex though. And you get owned by her, lol.
/r/seduction09/10/19 03:23 AM
8

Just read this bs: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/extra/tmZeuc7TX0/the-seduction-game It seems they want to completely criminalise the most of pickup community. All healthy men want to have sex, but society tries to shame us for it. Sure, most of pickup is needy and comes from beta perspective of "tricking" women into considering them alpha and give them sex. But it is much better than marrying someone just to get some shitty sex with one woman. And, surprise, pickup is actually working and helping …
/r/TheRedPill07/10/19 02:59 PM
1

If this guy is so weak that just some random girl can easily shut him up then most girls just lose interest in him.
/r/seduction02/10/19 04:33 PM
2

You can't force attraction in someone, but acting in certain way will make more people attracted to you. Without game you will attract about 5% of women and with solid game you can attract about 15% of women. Also there is a high chance that without game you will fail even with those who attracted to you because of simple and obvious mistakes.
/r/seduction02/10/19 04:32 PM
1

For hardgainers less is more. Hardgainer will gain more muscles if he exercise two times a week. It is different for endomorphs though - they should exercise more regularly to avoid gaining too much fat.
/r/seduction30/09/19 04:40 AM
1

For novice 2 days a week is more than enough. Also, you shouldn't spend more than one hour in gym - it is counter-productive.
/r/seduction30/09/19 04:38 AM
6

What exactly would be a "damage" in this case, mm? Getting orgasm from "beta" who masked himself as "alpha"? Oh, this is so terrible and damaging. PUA isn't different from makeup women use all the time. I personally don't give a fuck if my 8/10 girl is actually 5/10 without a makeup. I wouldn't blame her for "manipulating" me by using makeup and stylish clothes. I would enjoy sex with a 8/10 girl anyway. By your logic all women are psychopathic. Oh, stop. From some point of view they actually ar…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/19 04:15 AM
1

Em, bro. Just the fact that she is signed up on Tinder is the signal that she wants to hook up.
/r/seduction30/09/19 04:13 AM
3

You aren't lying about your product, you manipulate emotions of a person. Same way you aren't lying when you do pickup. Telling a girl that you are millionaire (when you are not) isn't pickup, lol. There is no lie in pickup.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/19 05:08 AM
2

Do you understand that by this logic ALL animals are "feminine"? By this logic you can call ANY concept feminine or masculine without any logic behind it. For example - hearing is feminine and seeing is masculine. It is just random bs.
/r/seduction29/09/19 05:06 AM
2

Sorry, but all of this isn't exactly about "masculinity" and "femininity". Always being in the moment is how animals live. Being able to plan, being "result-oriented" is that created human's culture, science and that makes humans - humans. It is our main difference to other species and not something exclusive to men.
/r/seduction28/09/19 06:47 PM
1

But she don't go for guys like you or else she wouldn't even have this problem. Only guys who can get sex effortlessly will ghost girls easily.
/r/seduction28/09/19 06:36 PM
4

Sorry to tell you, but you are probably very choosy with men and I don't talk about their readiness to commit or their personal qualities, but about their overall attractiveness. Most attractive men are got used to getting sex easily and instead of investing in you and becoming exclusive it is easier for them to find someone else. Most single guys are ready to commit to almost any attractive woman and to be exclusive with her. But if you go for guys who can get laid easily then you should unders…
/r/seduction28/09/19 06:34 PM
3

And when you meet a girl with whom you will develop close and intimate contact for a long time, when you will think that she is special and different from others.. then you will find out that either before meeting you or after, she fucked a guy she barely knew at their first date/meeting. It is much more likely that she isn't dtf immediately not because of her high standards, but because she isn't too much attracted to you. When a girl truly attracted she is no longer think long-term. And those …
/r/seduction28/09/19 06:25 PM
5

Could you imagine being very enthusiastic and physical with a girl, but not wanting the sex? It is possible in theory, but almost impossible in the real life. She can want to have sex, but there can be some circumstances which prevents you from following up. Like boyfriend, PMS, or her friends who will think she is a slut. If a girl isn't interested in sex with you then she wouldn't flirt, wouldn't act sexual with you in any way. Same way most guys wouldn't do any of it with sexually unattractiv…
/r/seduction28/09/19 06:20 PM
12

A lot of top-ranked comments I've seen are from post-wall black fat women.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/19 05:55 PM
5

Pure traditional pickup can be considered somehow psychopathic behavior by definition. But so are direct sales or any other form of behavior when you consciously manipulate someone's feelings to achieve your goals. Implementing such strategies doesn't make you an actual psychopath. In fact, lack of empathy and egoism are just small parts of psychopathy and, to some extent, every person has those qualities.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/19 05:54 PM
19

The most hilarious part of all of this.. the guy just trying to get sex. What is sex? It is a mutually beneficial and enjoyable past-time. He is basically "cheat" women to give them orgasms - one of the best things in their lives. Indeed, very cruel and predatory!
/r/TheRedPill28/09/19 05:43 PM
2

You missing the fact that not all "bad guys" are in prison. You can be a bully in high school, then be a total asshole in university and even do some minor crimes - and still avoid imprisonment. Most psychopaths are more likely to destroy people psychologically because they aren't too stupid and don't want to go to prison. They strive for dominance and only the stupidest among them choose physical dominance.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/19 04:10 PM
1

Men want to fuck. More than 90% of porn consumed by men. Men also stronger both physically and mentally. Men are better at enduring stress and more aggressive by nature. More than 90% of people who play competitive video-games are men. Basically it is a rule of nature. Woman's work is to attract as many men as she can (by being attractive) and then choose among those who wants her. Nowadays things are harder for guys because of online dating though.
/r/seduction25/09/19 01:38 PM
3

I know a guy who is exactly like this - 5'6 short and more than 220lbs fat. He still get laid with hot girls just because of his social skills and experience from high school when he was high in social hierarchy (he was athletic back then and also strong fighter).
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 04:00 AM
2

To neuroscience it is known how this works on level of your brain, but it is ten times harder to explain. The main thing is- there is limit to how much pleasure a person can feel because receptors which perceive the pleasure are limited in quantity and quality. This limit is different for each person. For example some guy can feel as much pleasure from porn as he has from real sex, usually people like this tend to be "porn addict" or "game addict", etc. Just because "fake" pleasure is enough to …
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 03:57 AM
13

He is also cold to girls and so he stole the love interest from beta MC, lol.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 03:45 AM
3

This never happens when it is the guy who was the aggressor. Never. They only arrest both parties when man is a victim.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/19 12:44 PM
2

So, for that reason he will, suddenly, start to prefer 25 years old to 20 years old after 10 years? It is more likely that it just would be harder to get laid with 20 years old, that is all. As he said - there is no big difference mentally between them. In fact, most people stay immature through all of their lives.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 04:02 AM
0

Intelligence is much broader concept than just some IQ tests. Moreover, being a genius is more of a random variation than result of genetics, this is why kids of geniuses aren't geniuses. You can be above average thanks to good genetics, but to be in top 1% you would need some amazing luck.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/19 09:04 AM
-3

Sorry to disappoint you, but intelligence isn't genetical for the most part, development of the brain is mostly random process. So smart parents can have stupid kids and vice-versa. Moreover intelligence isn't "inborn", a lot of positive qualities are developed through conscious efforts. It wouldn't be possible to make "perfect human" with gene editing, even if we talk about physical appearance perfection it is still far too in the future, like 50 years or so.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 06:11 PM
1

This is exactly what I'm talking about though. " For example when there is indisputable evidence of accusation being completely false, which is often the case. "
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 06:03 PM
1

Lol, what? You really believe that life in the prison don't influence your life expectancy negatively? Nowadays people ask for proofs even when you tell some common sense facts to them. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/06/26/life_expectancy/
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 06:01 PM
12

Vast majority of "rejections" happens within first minute though.
/r/seduction05/09/19 04:41 PM
2

Exactly. It isn't like "whamen are evil!". It is just social environment is shit and law system is too flawed. The problem isn't false accusations, but that people believe in them and liars are left unpunished even if they failed.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 04:26 PM
0

No fucking way you could enjoy your billions when you are 60-86 years old. Your hormonal status and overall health would be shit. You would be lucky to live past 60 when you spent half of your life in prison. Especially so if you also worked hard like many prisoners forced to. What the point of being billionaire when you already half-dead?
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 04:24 PM
3

There is a difference between unproven accusation and accusation which is PROVEN to be false. For example when there is indisputable evidence of accusation being completely false, which is often the case. Also, if she isn't sure if it was rape or not then it wasn't. If some guy was too drunk to see that he fucked someone unattractive it is his responsibility and he can't blame anyone other than himself for being too drunk. But if genders reversed then woman is a victim. Just because men take mor…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 04:19 PM
1

You can make your dick up to 2 inches bigger (with right exercises) though, so it is something that can be changed a little bit.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:44 AM
1

The problem is - cops would be on her side and you will go to prison.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:39 AM
0

Politicians who was smart and crafty enough to get their job. Citizens only select between 2-3 sorts of shit forced on them.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:17 PM
3

CHeating isn't a crime in modern countries.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:14 PM
2

HOW DARE he cheat on us?>?? HE should go to prison, lets make false accusations and ruin his life, girls!
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:14 PM
3

You used completely wrong analogy. It isn't you revenging on killers of your family. Instead it would be you killing families of innocent unrelated children just because someone killed your family. You was abused and so you abuse someone completely innocent and unrelated in return. From my personal point of view revenge for your family is morally fine. Raping a rapist isn't as bad as raping someone innocent. Even if you killed Gitler that's still the first-degree murder, but you would be a hero …
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:08 PM
1

Putting a girl in a hold can be considered molestation by feminists and cops. She will say that you touched her inappropriately and it would be almost true, because you can't put someone in a hold without very close physical contact. You will get more years in prison for that than just for knocking her out.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 03:58 PM
1

Close distance to a girl? And then she tell the cops you molested her. And there is a video-proof as well.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 03:56 PM
2

So if it was a fake call someone should go to jail anyway? Ok, thank you, officer.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 03:50 PM
0

You just pointed out cultural differences which weren't my point at all.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 03:42 PM
5

I've read the post. He fucked her because she flirted with him and he wanted her. I'm not sure that the fact she was a wife of his (former) friend was deciding factor. Even if she was single he would fuck her anyway, which is rather obvious from the post. ​ It is the problem if you put your actual friends below some vagina. But from the post it was rather obvious that TS doesn't respect this former friend anymore because of how submissive he become. Here is his quote " I wouldn't do this shit to…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/19 07:32 AM
1

And then you can read literally dozens of articles of individuals who changed their life with "the Secret and power of thought", or by believing in Jesus, etc. Just some post hoc fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc I have had my body language in check for years while still staying a virgin. I was confident enough to look straight in the eyes to anyone, I've had confident posture, etc. Right posture is good for your health, sure. But it isn't something that can change…
/r/seduction01/09/19 03:24 PM
1

This Ted talk wasn't approved by scientific community though. Why? Because the difference in hormonal level is too low to be considered significant.
/r/seduction01/09/19 03:04 PM
1

Ugh.. What you guys can't understand is that your reaction "oh, congratulations!" is the whole reason why you struggle with girls. You consider getting intimate with a girl as a "prize", as a proof of you being the cool guy. No. ​ Bro, you aren't "made it". It is she who "made it" by being better than other girls who were unable to understand your good points. Being with a girl isn't something for that you work, it isn't the reward. Stop putting women and sex on a pedestal. It isn't a big deal. …
/r/seduction01/09/19 12:58 PM
2

It is legit that having a good body language is better than having the bad one. But OP clearly exaggerated the importance of body language. I have had such "confident body language" for years while still remaining a virgin. I become good with girls, but not because of "body language". Your inner confidence and a strong frame are much more important. And they will make your body language right automatically.
/r/seduction01/09/19 12:26 PM
2

It doesn't matter if women make a false accusation, there always would be such a people as long as false accusation goes unpunished for the false victim and ruin life of falsely accused. There wouldn't be any false accusations if they were pointless. You was sexually harassed? Ok, do you have any proofs? No? Sorry, then you can fck off. It can be somehow harsh, but there is no way around it.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:18 PM
1

If we assume that all "unproven" accusations are false then there would be much more than 15%.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:13 PM
20

She accused him of being somehow "abusive" (overprotective, too clingy, somehow into BDSM) in consensual relationships they have had which isn't a real crime. So even if we assume that her accusations were true (which is unlikely, considering who she is) he didn't something too terrible. I assume both of them are psychically sick people though. No man in his right mind will date someone like her.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:10 PM
4

If someone really important to you died then YOU will care about tombstone.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:05 PM
0

It is 60% though, not 90%. And only because most men are too lazy to do shopping. In fact men have higher buying power. Even in feminism era men earn more.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:01 PM
12

You getting it wrong guys. Maybe instead of doing the same irrational shit the feminist do you actually understand why they are wrong? It shouldn't be "oh, feminists say it is fine to be fat or skinny, so we, men, should do the same". No, body positivity is the irrational unscientific concept. Being athletic is better than being too skinny or fat. It is obvious. BTW this guy is more aesthetically pleasing than any 200lbs+ woman. And his face is rather handsome, so he is a bad example.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:52 AM
1

So, how more choosy with women you become? Most guys are interested in fucking anything physically attractive and not too crazy. It is the same at 12, at 22 and at 42. I was able to distinguish fat girl from hot girl even back then, so obviously I was old enough to decide if I want to fuck someone or not.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:45 AM
1

So, what exactly is "the ship", mm?
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:44 AM
1

Nah, it was 40 years ago, lol. Nowadays female population is roughly equal to male population in quantity.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:18 AM
0

It depends on that exactly you mean by "the ship". It is rather stupid to argue about some random metaphor.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:04 AM
1

I'm not from USA, but from Russia. Women are fine here, for the most part.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:04 AM
1

In most countries if you are minor then you can have sex with anyone who is 12 or older. I.e. 16-years old can legally have sex with 12-years old in most countries. IDK about laws of the state in which this story happened though, but I assume it was similar or else consequences for the girl would be more severe. Don't forget about female teachers who is in prison for having sex with 16-years old men, so law doesn't just ignore women in this types of crime even if most people disagree. Age of sta…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:02 AM
1

I would say that 95% of guys are like this. It is normal. You are the strange one for thinking otherwise. Maybe you are late bloomer, but most guys want to fuck adult women starting from when they are 11-13 years old. In fact 13 years old boy would be stronger than average adult woman and even would be able to rape her. By your logic if he actually raped his teacher it is she who is the criminal?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 06:03 PM
2

IDK, when I was 12-13 years old I was old enough to give a consent and would be glad to fuck hot 16-years old. And most guys were like this.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 06:00 PM
0

So you prefer commanding women instead of submissive ones? Good luck building a family with a woman who wouldn't accept you as the head of the family. There is no misogyny in facts. Equal relationships are called the friendship and in sexual relationships someone always has more power than the other one. And the only way to build lasting relationships is to be the one in control because when woman get the power she loses her attraction to you. Also, there is no "luck" with women because you alwa…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:56 PM
11

It wouldn't save you from false accusations though, there were cases when gays were falsely accused by women as well.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:50 PM
0

If she is able to run the ship by herself then she will always try to take your role away. Just because she can.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:21 PM
-1

There is no contradiction. Woman can be submissive to you and still being able to "take care of herself".
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:18 PM
-5

Well, most guys don't want "strong independent woman" though. You will build much better relationships with a weak submissive woman who never argues with you and always accepts your rules. It is much better than always compromising on everything.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:23 AM
1

Maybe it is because I personally know at least two people who become millionaires even though they were born in poor families? Maybe because it isn't a secret that kind of life live those who inherited international businesses? In 90% cases rich parents wouldn't allow you to slack off or "just enjoy life", they would force you to get educated in the most prestigious schools/universities, then they will make sure you are qualified to inherit the business. If parents just allow their kids to "get …
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:15 AM
2

Psychological abuse shouldn't be considered a crime. There is no specialist which can truthfully ascertain it for sure. In fact some people are emotional masochists and they choose partners who psychologically abuse them. Don't forget about real SM which involves some consensual forms of abuse.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:30 AM
2

Actually, there already was the case of a bridge, designed by a female-only team of engineers, being collapsed.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:58 AM
1

Rich people don't "work hard", they "learn hard" which I already said multiple times. Life sure isn't fair, there is nothing harsh in it. Some people not just born in poor families, they also were born stupid and without any chance to become intelligent, they are also born weak without any chance to compete in sports, they are also born lazy, without any chance to change themselves. So what? The only thing that matters is to each of us make efforts for themselves. What I said is only that you ar…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:56 AM
1

My point was completely different though. If you already completed MIT then it is almost impossible for you to be left without work.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:47 AM
2

You can be billionaire's ex wife and then marry someone with little money who would be loyal love of your life. There is no contradiction here, lol.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 10:08 AM
2

Google statistics - there are certain universities and professions that basically guarantee your future prospects in 90% cases.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 10:07 AM
2

Do you really think that generational multi-millionaires just do nothing? If you are heir of big corporation then you would be forced to work hard from your early childhood. While other kids have fun and play games you study. While other teens fuck at college parties - you study. And when you become adult you are given responsibility for thousands of people and you wouldn't have enough free time to enjoy your billions. You can't just say "fuck off, I get the money and will do whatever I want". O…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 10:05 AM
7

There is nothing better to distract you from urges to rape women than imaginary raping Pikachu. He also voiced by woman btw.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:56 AM
2

So-called inappropriate remarks shouldn't even be considered a crime because this term is way too subjective. Women would be fine if someone attractive (which is subjective) flirting with them, even if it is excessively sexual. But if it is someone they don't like then it, suddenly, becomes a crime and you can lose your job because of it. And then women cry that their cute co-worker ignores them. Sexual harassment is when someone doing completely unacceptable things repeatedly when the victim ei…
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:47 AM
6

Em, most people in USA earn far less than six figures, some of them work even more than you and they are just fine. Median individual income for full-time worker is 45k$ annually which is, at least, less than half of that you earn. And if you earn more than 400k$ per year then you can be considered to be in top 1%.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/19 04:17 AM
6

Moreover, even if we add 2-3 women to a group of 100 men it wouldn't change anything. Moreover, most women who are interested in IT aren't even fuckable.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/19 02:39 AM
8

This is true equality, for example in competitive sport there is clear distinction between men and women. Why? Because men are stronger, so it is just fair! And now this university acknowledged that men are smarter too, or else why lowering standards for women?
/r/TheRedPill30/08/19 02:35 AM
11

There is nothing about equality here though. It is about getting privileges for females.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/19 02:31 AM
1

It kills your sub-communication and, in fact, lowers both your chances with this particular girl and with girls in general. The strongest frame is "Instead, he will make demands, he will make rules she should follow to be qualified to stay with him. ". This is why if you can't get it and accept it you still will have insecurities and some struggles with girls even though you know everything about the frame and think that yours is strong. If you use a strong frame to get the girl she still can fe…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/19 02:22 AM
7

And here I thought that you are someone who "get it". It seems you just read AMS, but still didn't understand the deeper truth behind his message. By definition, the alpha male is someone to whom sex is worthless because he can get it easily. It means that he wouldn't make any efforts to convince a woman to give sex to him. Instead, he will make demands, he will make rules she should follow to be qualified to stay with him. When you sub-communicate your readiness to "game" this "maybe" girl you …
/r/TheRedPill29/08/19 04:00 PM
29

I can tell to you that it isn't just "making the most of the numbers game", but something deeper. Most guys can't get it, they just can't. This guy never thinks from the perspective of a woman. He doesn't try to learn "right things to say so that she was impressed", "right frames to get laid", "how to pass her shit tests", etc. He is coming from a completely egoistical and self-centered perspective. I know what I want and either this girl gives it to me, or I will find someone else who will. He …
/r/seduction29/08/19 02:44 PM
2

I think it is very personal thing and depends completely on you. Even when I was a virgin who watched porn every day my dick could become hard just by seeing a hot girl, or being close to one. When my first sex happened I didn't have any problems with erection and a girl didn't even realised that I was a virgin. I think the problem isn't porn by itself, but if your fetishes become way too extreme and apart from reality. For most people watching porn possess no problem, but if you add to it extre…
/r/seduction29/08/19 05:09 AM
1

This is why I said "some" women. And it is true. Those women usually date convicts, drug dealers, bullies from school, etc.
/r/seduction29/08/19 05:02 AM
3

You can't google "sexual fantasies of women"? Also it is experience of any guy who was with more than 10 girls. Most girls love submission in sex, sometimes very hardcore. Some of them need it in relationships as well, though you should avoid such women because they love drama and suffering.
/r/seduction28/08/19 05:39 PM
2

This is why I said that some women. You are just proving my point and nothing you said contradict to my post.
/r/seduction28/08/19 05:37 PM
1

Not really, I know some model looking guys who are still insecure about their looks. The point is - being insecure is hurting you even if your insecurities are based on reality.
/r/seduction28/08/19 05:33 PM
1

Whaaat? You telling that "asking for nudes is harassment if girl didn't ask for it"? So girl should tell you "please, can you ask me to send you my nudes?". WTF is wrong with you? Also, read my previous posts, it seems you completely missed my point.
/r/seduction28/08/19 05:31 PM
6

Exactly. Some women are just emotional masochists.
/r/seduction28/08/19 04:48 AM
2

Well, multiple researches prove that some women are actually want men who treat them badly and disrespect them. And when it comes to sex then a lot of women want to be treated badly, sexual masochism is rather common and humiliation is important part of it. There are women who will ask you to piss on them, call them dirty whores or spit on them - and you would be surprised how common it is.
/r/seduction28/08/19 04:43 AM
2

People aren't psychics. Often they can't see you acting even if you are bad actor.
/r/seduction28/08/19 04:40 AM
2

Who are "they"? If you are short then there are always would be people who will be bothered by it, but there would be also people who are fine with it. Same with being fat, ugly, having a too-high voice, strange hobbies, etc. Whatever unattractive qualities you have there are always would be people who don't care. There always would be women (including hot ones) who will fuck you anyway as long as you are confident and take action. The difference is in the number of such people. You can own your…
/r/seduction28/08/19 04:33 AM
1

Did I asked for your help anywhere? I'm here not to ask for advices, but to give them to guys who are less successful with women than I'm. Also, yeah, I understand women, but women don't understand logic. By definition of "harassment" such acts aren't harassment - there is nothing intimidating or aggressive in sharing your photos, even if they are erotic or make people uncomfortable. A lot of men become very uncomfortable when they see obese women in revealing clothes, but it isn't harassment. O…
/r/seduction28/08/19 04:23 AM
1

Imagine men reacting this same way to pics of your vagina. Ugh, why you sending me something so gross? LMAO.
/r/seduction27/08/19 07:52 PM
1

There are some posts about "that you missing" on this sub, just check top posts of all time. Frame and confidence trample anything else.
/r/seduction27/08/19 07:51 PM
1

I don't care about woman's feeling, but I never ever sent any dick picks, lol. I just explained to you the logic behind it. You don't understand men. We don't want "only sex", but we want sex above anything else if we can't get it. We can be fine without your love, without your personality or without you being impressed. But sex is physiological necessity for most men and you either fap or have sex. On the other hand it is hard to call it "sexual harassment". Does sending your tit picks to men w…
/r/seduction27/08/19 07:50 PM
0

Tell it to my fat ugly friend who fuck hotties, he will laugh at you together with me.
/r/seduction27/08/19 05:42 PM
1

It make sense that guys can't understand it because we want girls (even random girls) send nudes to us and even if some ugly girls send us nudes we wouldn't shame them for it. So guys just follow words of the Jesus " Therefore whatever you desire for people to do to you, you. shall also do to them; for this is the law of the prophets. ".
/r/seduction27/08/19 05:41 PM
0

Your objective is to be liked by girls. My objective - is to find girls who are worthy of my time. We come from completely different point of view. Obviously I don't tell girls "send me nudes so what I know if you are good enough". It is a reason why I do this, not how I actually communicate it. Asking for nudes is a good way to know if girl is ready for sex or no. If she sends you nudes then it is even possible that she will just go straight to your place to have sex. This is of course isn't "r…
/r/seduction27/08/19 05:37 PM
1

So you need, well, about one year of going to a gym and not eating shit.. It would be so simple if women cared only about looks. The problem is - you need much more to be really popular with women.
/r/seduction27/08/19 12:28 PM
-8

You can ask for nudes if girl is interested, but you aren't sure if she is hot enough based on her photos. You aren't asking for nudes to fap on it, you tell her to give you her nudes for you to decide if she is good enough for you or not. You aren't doing it from position of "oh, I want to see you nude so much". You are doing it from position of "I'm not sure if I should meet you yet". By sending nudes she invest in you and prove what she is interested enough. If she did it then it is very like…
/r/seduction27/08/19 12:21 PM
2

Wrong. You should never ever send nudes because you can be charged for it if you are man and woman you send it to finds it offensive.
/r/seduction27/08/19 12:18 PM
2

Average age of losing virginity is 16 years old. It is so high because there a lot of incels and some 30 years old virgins, on average more or less popular teens start to have sex when they are 14-15. Unless you educate your daughter very strictly then she will fuck boys starting from this age. Boys usually start to fap when they are 11-13 years old, so at 16 they are probably know more about sex than some 40 years old guys because 20 years ago porn wasn't so available.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/19 11:55 AM
0

Em, no? If my daughter in her mid-teens fucks someone then I don't care if it is her teacher or her schoolmate. In fact I would prefer her teacher to fuck her because if it is some boy same age as her then it is more likely what he is unable to make her orgasm, it is unlikely he would be able to provide for her if she is pregnant and it is more likely that he doesn't know about proper contraception. Though there is a difference between boys and girls - for a girl it is good if she is a virgin at…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/19 11:38 AM
2

Not really. The thing is - women decide if you are "dominant and high status" based on your behavioural patterns, not your actual social standing. Bullying and psychopathy has nothing to do with high status in modern society (on contrary, those qualities very likely can make you a loser criminal), but it is perceived "high value" in underdeveloped brain of a woman which wasn't changed too much from 100 000 years ago. ​ Elon Musk has one of the highest statuses in our society, but he is absolutel…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 05:07 PM
-4

Kids in their mid teens aren't "actual children", biologically they are adults. If female teacher actually fuck young guys from her school then who is "harmed" here? When I was horny schoolboy I would be more than happy to fuck some of my hot young teachers.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 04:56 PM
1

He has more than 8k subscribers on patreon, he earns at least 20k$ each month just from it, why should he care about shit ads?
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 04:33 PM
4

G2A steal games from players and make you pay for it. Torrents steal games from developers and you pay nothing. Why would you even consider buying a game other than supporting the developer?
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 04:29 PM
21

I disagree. It is hard for me to understand someone who knows about RP and still act like this guy. RP exist because you can learn from other's mistakes.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 04:23 PM
36

It is obvious through their interaction on the video. It isn't single gesture here, but all non-verbal (and verbal) communication between them. If it was she who is wealthy.. she wouldn't even look at him, let alone paying for his education, lol.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/19 04:21 PM
9

Just checked out your history for reference to understand wtf are you saying. So, you really think it is bad to pursue sex with women? So, you really think that absolutely above average looking guy is 2/10 (maybe you are just being racist)? This sub is about how to get laid, how to fulfil your "primal desires". It is absolutely normal. I personally disagree with this post because good inner game contradict to concept of outer game, but I also know that advice given in it is legit.
/r/seduction25/08/19 11:06 AM
6

You should be the one who allows her to be with you, not vice versa. You make rules and she either obey them or you will find someone else who will. She should understand that if she did something wrong then it is a good bye. The problem is - it isn't possible (or just too hard) when you are married. In married life she can say "fuck you" at any time because there are no consequences to her, but you are restrained because your money will be hers if you divorce.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 05:29 AM
2

I don't think it is about your face or height, but about your personality and neediness. Sorry to tell you this, but being goodlooking isn't enough, especially so with more attractive women. Some fatty can fuck you no matter what if you are hot enough, just because she lack validation. But hotter women choose whom to fuck based on multiple qualities. If you act like a pussy who put women above himself, who make all efforts to be liked by them - then you will fail in most cases. Red Pill isn't on…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/19 05:12 AM
1

This is such a bs, bro. I was a virgin until 24, but I never was negative about it and never was depressed about it, let alone having suicide thoughts. Getting girls is about luck + efforts more than anything else. Your life is as shitty as you allow it to be. There are many ways to enjoy it without pussy, the best thing she can do for you is a little bit enhancing your sexy time, from fleshlight to a girl, in fact the difference isn't big, especially if you lack experience and the girl isn't go…
/r/seduction25/08/19 04:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter