TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheMythof_Feminism Archive

View 18 posts and 4,010 comments by TheMythof_Feminism on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

GeneralTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights21/07/18 11:42 PM
14

Marriage/ChildrenTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights08/08/18 08:13 PM
14

CultureTheMythof_Feminism/r/TheRedPill01/04/18 05:32 AM
12

FeminismTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:51 AM
12

GeneralTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights15/07/18 07:11 PM
12

Marriage/ChildrenTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:40 PM
11

Marriage/ChildrenTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:53 AM
10

FeminismTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights11/08/18 12:31 AM
6

Social IssuesTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:40 AM
6

Legal RightsTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:03 PM
6

GeneralTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:59 AM
5

Social IssuesTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:00 PM
5

TheMythof_Feminism/r/MGTOW29/01/18 09:11 PM
3

FeminismTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:48 AM
2

Legal RightsTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:00 AM
0

Marriage/ChildrenTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:11 AM
0

GeneralTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:44 PM
0

GeneralTheMythof_Feminism/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:00 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,010 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Imagine a girl walks up to you at a party, and says she'll acuse you of rape Unfortunately for you, in my nation calumny is a crime. Most women wouldn't be stupid enough to commit such an act. Calumny is the crime of maliciously seeking false charges against someone for various reasons. The merriam webster definition is; 1 : a misrepresentation intended to harm another's reputation 2 : the act of uttering false charges or misrepresentations maliciously calculated to harm another's reputation or …
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:28 AM
0

I was raped, and there wasn't any physical evidence beyond that we had sex. ... do you really want me to poke the obvious holes in your story? I can do that, but I will do you the courtesy of asking before doing so. You brought it up specifically as a response to physical evidence and I have no problem moving forward. You want to proceed? It's very plausible that a rape leaves no evidence beyond what would be possible for concensual sex. Nope. If you had a gun to your throat, the gun itself is e…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:58 AM
12

SJW/feminist hives are echo chambers at the best of times.... Remember that those groups of people are the absolute bottom of the barrel. The worst humanity has to offer.... sometimes I see the SJWs/feminists compared to 4chan, and I don't visit 4chan but I know some people who do and know what kind of guys hang out there. Those guys at least have a sense of fun and will occasionally do amazing things like the Shia Capture the Flag event. They are also self-aware and honest. Conversely the SJW/f…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:43 AM
1

Fair point, I should have elaborated.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:37 AM
1

You don't seem to understand, Obama was smuggling muslims into Mexico, to then smuggle them into the U.S. Mexico was the waypoint into the U.S. , to keep from creating a scandal. I was one of the first people IN THE WORLD (/flex) to break this story. The cover was Haiti's poor response to the hurricane at the time [Note how the other side of the island did significantly better?], but only a small part of the blacks were haitians. Most of them were africans, and those africans were muslims. Obama…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:55 AM
3

Yes, sexual education content? "Education"? she was a blatant propagandist.... You appear to hold her in high regard, for what reason I really don't know. She wasn't quite as heinous as Jessica Valenti but Laci Green, for a very long time was a prominent figure in SJW/feminist circles. Surely you know this....? I notice you ducked my question, I will ask again but more directly; Who cares, men are attracted to women and evaluate them based on looks. This is something all men do. Do you consider …
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:53 AM
1

Maybe Obama was on to something. Obama was the worst president the U.S. has ever had. Utterly inept simp.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:48 AM
3

Holy Moley mate, little objectifying there eh? ... are you familiar with the type of content she produced for many years? evidently not. I'm not sure about this video, but she was extremely crude/vulgar and I have no compunction about being crude right back. However, even if that wasn't the case, who gives a fuck about such nonsense. Men evaluate women based on looks, this is something all men do and to pretend otherwise is to be wildly ignorant or wildly dishonest.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:46 AM
1

Hell if some junkie breaks into your house and hurts themselves while they're on your property illegaly by force they can sue you too. I've heard about such cases in the U.S., I didn't know they happened in Canada. Here in Mexico, if someone breaks into your home, again short of killing them anything you do is nice and legal. Then again Mexico has a commie president elect.... we're fucked. HEY , how difficult is it to legally immigrate to Canada?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:01 AM
7

or the consequences meaning jail for life be damned. I don't know Canada, but in Mexico if someone tries/succeeds in inflicting chemical burns on you, if you turn that bleach right back to the person who did it, you will not be charged with a crime. Short of killing the person, you're fine. It is easily justifiable as self-defense, reaction under extreme pain, etc.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 03:30 AM
3

As you said, you might be preaching to the choir so to speak because I doubt anyone will have any issue with any of this. It is pretty safe to say that "woman" is life's very easy difficulty mode. Men do not have so-called "privilege" by virtue of being men... women do, a LOT actually. The difference is, men generally don't give a fuck about women having advantages as long as we are not kneecapped as a result of their benefits. Leftists love the idea of so-called "male privilege" because it is a…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:34 AM
5

Serena Williams = Liar, cheater, sore loser, dishonorable, etc. Ugly on the outside, ugly on the inside.... glad Osaka Naomi schooled her ass.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:15 AM
-2

Tits still nice. The rest of her has aged miserably and I can't imagine her videos have gotten any better.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:14 AM
17

Sweden had an election, they voted for the "WE NEED MOAR MUSLIMS" party [majority vote]. They deserve what they get.... honestly, most of my life I always found jokes like "The french are cowardly" and "the swedish are gay/cucks" to be absurd and false. As I have grown older I am starting to see why people spread those jokes....
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:13 AM
1

I don't understand this extreme hesitation to remove the muslims from the U.K. or even the U.S. Let's pretend they don't commit 99% of terrorist killings worldwide. The muslims are still extremely destructive, very dishonest and actively subversive of the best interest of whatever nation they've infected. Mexico was stuck with 15,000 muslims due to one of Obama's many fuck-ups. The government and the people of Mexico were friendly at first, but after muslims behaved like a bunch of self-importan…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:51 AM
4

Nope. I am not an activist, that's why I never call myself an MRA. I support the MRM and wish to see it succeed, but I have to work for a living...
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:39 AM
23

In Mexico, if a woman poured bleach on a man's crotch, she would be regetting it , moments after. And by regretting it, I mean the type of regret that she will remember for the rest of her life. You do not cause chemical burns on a man, let alone a man's dick unless you are prepared to face equitative retribution of the worst kind.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:38 AM
0

the other is utterly useless to stand up to it This is what I don't understand. Isn't the right supposed to be the side of the patriots? the ones that defend their nation's values? what is being done to Kavanaugh is not only extremely disrespectful, it would be criminal in my nation. I don't understand....
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:12 AM
1

Roe lied about having been raped. Not at all surprised. It had been a very long time (10+ years) since I read up on it but I vaguely remembered that it was complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:09 AM
4

You being dumb =/= me being smart. I'm average, above average at best.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:08 AM
4

And really like to pretend you're smart .... knowing the definition of the word toxic is "smart"? Good lord, if that's the metric you use, you are very special.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:08 AM
4

So you have mental issues in that you intentionally seek out offensive and vile content. Projection. You appear to have mental issues, quite severe mental issues at that. What I am advocating for, is for comedy to be unrestricted as it should be. It's not a decree by fiat, as a matter of fact. Your personal ethos is not an objective metric of what is correct. You are simply doing the SJW/feminist tactic of "this is offensive and therefore should not exist" , the cowardly, socialist stance. who w…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:58 PM
6

Comedy should be subjugate to the same principles of human decency as anything else. Fuck no. You are advocating for "safe" and "inoffensive" comedy. GTFO with that shit. Even if I don't agree or find a particular joke funny, comedy must necessarily be free flowing and unrestrained, more than any other practice. because that's how an ethical society operates. You do not get to dictate your personal ethos to others as a matter of cause. Not to mention a decree by fiat like that is just asinine an…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:40 PM
3

Concepts are nothing without being defined Hear hear. The ambiguous, subjectivist crap that they try to play off is just nonsensical drivel.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:37 PM
6

just because some liquid is toxic does not imply that all liquid is toxic. Actually all liquid is toxic, but that would extend to all substances. Toxicity refers to an inability to metabolize a substance within proper form (Ex: Excess oxygen leads to metabolic acidosis), an improper location for a substance to be (Ex: Calculi somewhere like the subarachnoid space) or inability to process altogether (Ex: Dogs with anti freeze). Literally anything can be toxic. Oxygen is extremely toxic, water can…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:28 PM
4

if she was not effed to the point of near death This is a very important point to make. "Rape" is never, ever fatal.... the reason for this is, we have a word for a "rape" that in the process, kills someone; It's called murder. Rape is 0% fatal.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:20 PM
4

I was thinking NASA space-suit. Kinky.......... I find it incomprehensible that anyone can believe the sentiment "He left no physical evidence" of a crime like rape or something along those lines...... people are so incredibly desperate to "believe women" that they will swallow bullshit , wholesale.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:01 PM
4

It is stupid to try and fight a fair fight, against a dirty opponent. I understand exactly where you're coming from and don't blame you at all.... but I am unwilling to compromise my principles just to make things easier. The shorter, easier path, is almost always a trap that leads to a worse outcome.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:59 PM
1

He's guilty of treason .... what did he do that would have him charged with "treason"? I don't want him to be confirmed because of how he votes on some issues That's called having a different opinion/interpretation of a case, you brain-addled cunt. These people are actually making the argument that only supreme court justices that rule the way they decide, are acceptable. This Kavanaugh guy has done nothing wrong and that protest is a joke. The constitutional right we have to Roe v. Wade Wait, I…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:26 PM
8

smart enough not to leave physical evidence. Anyone that says a rape left "no physical evidence" is giving away the fact that they are both lying and completely ignorant about how an investigation occurs. Rape leaves tons of physical evidence , every single time, no exceptions. The only way to leave zero evidence is to plan it to an incredibly psychotic degree, to the point where it is absurd and nonsensical. All rapes leave a ton of physical evidence.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:17 PM
9

"cuts baby for womb"? A woman convicted of killing her pregnant neighbour by cutting the baby from her womb has told a court her boyfriend had pressured her to "produce a baby" after figuring out she had lied about being pregnant. Holy shit, talk about burying the lead. If and when a man does this, it is a........... wait for it.................... DOUBLE HOMICIDE. Crews pleaded guilty to murder and is serving life in prison without parole. Good. About fucking time a woman faced proper consequen…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:14 PM
1

Sometimes people just can't find livable wages. I don't buy it. If someone works hard , even a low end job can sustain someone just fine. There's a reason poverty exist Yes. Laziness and irresponsible behavior. To be fair, mental illness is also a factor, but that cannot be solved via socialist programs. The mental illness problem is unrelated. you said yourself the scale of the behavior varies. I've seen quite a few women exhibit far lower negative traits. These are the ones to look for. Sure, …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:33 PM
1

Sometimes people's circumstances are out of their control, i.e shitty education And? education isn't a right. You don't need an education to get a low end job that you could sustain yourself off of. I'm really not. You are.... poor people are responsible for their own behavior, trying to subjugate/arbitrate the citizenry to get a more equal outcome is equality of outcome. Equality of opportunity is about eliminating governmental barriers against the citizenry at large. For example; I think we ca…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:05 PM
2

No. It is a joke, you can find it propagandist in nature; It is. You can find it terribly boring and uninteresting, I agree. You can find it based on a false premise, you'd be right. None of these are relevant. Again comedy has exactly one metric of value; Is the joke funny to the audience you are addressing (?) You don't seem to understand I completely agree with you, but your argument just falls flat against comedy.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:58 PM
2

I just don’t see the comedy here. Humor is subjective. I do not find Kimmel funny, or entertaining for that matter.... but it is undeniable that it was a joke. A joke intended to forward propaganda, but a joke nonetheless. It could be funny if there was any shred of credible evidence that Kavanaugh was guilty of anything. You do not get to determine what is "funny". Humor is subjective. I agree with you in principle. You are right.... but again, in the arena of comedy, everything and everyone is…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:53 PM
8

I'm not sure if I am reading this correctly.... does this mean that Obama's retarded 1984 style Title IX program took a hit? It seems as though the necessary standard of evidence has gone up, which is a very good thing.... I don't know what it is about that article but it's written in a very clunky, difficult to read way.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:47 PM
16

Kimmel is a piece of garbage. But in the arena of comedy, everything is fair game. Unlike the SJWs/feminists, I do not believe that he did anything wrong. Just like I would not oppose rape jokes, battered women jokes, or any type of dirty joke in general.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:43 PM
1

I know, I agree but I can't see any other way where the poor don't get shit on How about they get a job and pay for their own expenses? poor people are not poor by accident, they are poor because they are lazy and irresponsible. Rewarding such behavior and punishing the hard worker by taking his money just doesn't make sense. apart from trying to ensure equal opportunities for them. Actually you don't appear to be seeking equality of opportunity, you appear to be advocating for equality of outco…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:40 PM
1

. I don't agree with having no welfare because it's kind of shitting on the poor That doesn't really make sense..... No one has the right to someone else's money. How did you find this sub then? I'm an anti-feminist and have been so for over 20 years. While opposing feminism and supporting the rights of men are not the same thing, I find that there is a lot of overlap. I'm on the verge of going MGTOW myself, for the same reason. Not sure if it's worth it though, just trying to find the "right on…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:26 PM
3

cucks must be confronted. But that's not what this is. Jimmy Kimmel is a well known propagandist. Male feminsts at large are considered absolute garbage. I'm not sure what you think was "confronted" or achieved. All neo-Marxist dogmas, in general, propagate hate. "Hate" is irrelevant.... thought policing is not something I endorse. That being said, I agree that marxists/leftist dogma at large is entirely without merit.... but it is only natural that leftists are violent, the core value of their …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:56 PM
1

Is Mexico that bad too, men's rights-wise? Actually no, things are relatively good here.... you appear to be interested, so I will explain at length; .... Example 1: Since the government and the people at large lean a lot more towards the right (heavy emphasis on liberty and low regulation of human interaction) , things are a lot better here than in the U.S.... for example, in divorce proceedings, women do indeed get favored by the judges, but men are not enslaved, made to pay absurd amounts for…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:41 PM
5

I agree with what is in that article, but I have to ask, is there anyone that doesn't already consider "male feminists" incredibly sleazy? you know, dishonest weasel types.... even the feminists very much look down on the "male feminist" types. Just seems like low hanging fruit in my opinion.... don't get me wrong, I agree that they, especially high profile male feminists like Jimmy Kimmel, are dishonest pieces of trash that are virtue signaling at the expense of any integrity they may have orig…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:28 PM
10

Why is the U.S. allowing this? From the false accusations to this asinine plan to disrupt proceedings, in Mexico, such things would lead to the street level guys taking a few nightsticks to the face..... and the person falsely accusing the politician would be charged with calumny [I.e. a decades old incident deliberately made at a key moment to undermine the ascension of a judicial functionary; That is considered an extremely severe form of calumny]. I expect better from the world's superpower..…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:14 PM
1

Sick. Missed work. Worried. Relationship wise? went full MGTOW about a month ago. Until or unless something drastically changes, I don't intend to invest in a woman, let alone bring a child on board.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:01 PM
1

"Sexual racism"? /facepalm People having preferences is not racism.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:59 PM
3

Innovator: "Hey here's a way for men to channel their sexual urges in whatever way they see fit in a safe and controlled environment by themselves." SJWs/feminists : "DAS RAYCIS, ZMOG SHUT IT DOWN. MISOGERNE!!!!" Eventually there will be Blade Runner/Chobits level robots. When that day comes, the SJWs/feminists are truly fucked.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:59 PM
27

"Toxic masculinity" is a concept that should always be dismissed outright. It is not worth entertaining even for a brief moment. Some things are above reproach [Ex: You should not mass murder school children, obviously] and others are beneath consideration [Ex: "Toxic masculinity"]. It's a complete non-starter, utter drivel.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:55 PM
4

I mean, obviously? I knew this when I was 10 years old... are feminists really that remedial?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:54 PM
-1

Wow, look at mr main protaganist. Did you sit at the back of the classroom near a window and have atleast 5 different chicks trying to fuck you at all times? How many evil overlords have you stopped by now? Whens the cinematic adaptation? Is this guy mentally ill? /u/nuclearcatpotatoe , dismissed.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:50 AM
0

Age of consent should not be considered malleable. Stopped reading right there. To third party readers that are not part of the mob; I'll give a practical example where in my nation, and in fact in most nations across the world, age of consent is context dependent. Let's say a teenage girl has a child at 15 years of age. In my nation, and again in most nations, this is enough to confer to her full adult status. This means she is now "legal", there are several reasons for this, one is that she ne…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:47 AM
6

Mike Nifong and Crystal Gale Mangum should both have been charged with a crime, and possibly sentenced a long time for what they did.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:54 AM
2

Wait, so even if a woman signs the consent form , she can come back, sue and win? What the fuck? how does that even begin to make sense? I see why they are so unwilling to perform such a procedure.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:37 AM
12

A simple Google search about "Presumption of innocence " would indicate otherwise. Not sure why you are lying so transparently. A google search corroborates everything I've said. I call troll. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:01 AM
2

Barbarrossa, an old MGTOW video maker, once said that because of reasons like this and others like information being withheld during judicial process, that if selected for a jury, men should engage in jury nullification. If a man is charged with , say, rape, it is impossible to know the truth as a jury member due to the amount of evidence that is withheld. It is also true that men are falsely accused very often, because of this, he advocated voting not guilty every single time regardless of the …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:49 AM
7

The only time health benefits are justifiable in circumcision as an argument, is if there is a congenital defect or if there is a recurring infection. Only in these two (relatively rare) cases is circumcision a health benefit. To suggest otherwise is to lie and spread propagandist myths.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:44 AM
14

Presumption of innocence is about court not public opinion. Actually it is both a legal and ethical tenet. For a senator to advocate a violation of it on either level is extremely egregious and I would say, grounds for her to be stripped of her political power. /u/jy9000 I'm not sure how you can disagree with the statement "Senators should not be advocating for severe human rights violations, ever."
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:35 AM
41

Presumption of innocence is regarded across most of the world as the most fundamental and sacred human right of them all. For a senator to just straight up advocate the violation of such a right should immediately have her be stripped of her political position. No one who holds a high political office should be advocating for severe human rights violations. Ever.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:27 AM
3

Awesome, you are a good brother. Best of luck to you both.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:24 AM
2

She betrayed my family and I want to keep her away. Absolutely, I don't blame you at all. My brother doesnt realize what she really is. Fuck, I am sorry to hear that. I hope he will be alright.... I hope you are not holding any resentment against him, we men can sometimes see women with different eyes that blind us from seeing what they truly are.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:46 AM
6

Equal Rights means catching equal lefts. That's funny. I wouldn't do that though, I am satisfied with watching a woman in trouble, and just walking away....... I have no reason to jump in and rescue or protect someone who is my equal but wouldn't do the same for me. To be a huge nerd, to paraphrase Batman, I won't hurt you, but I don't have to save you.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:27 AM
2

She assumed my brother would get his inheritance and she would get it through him. Oh, OH. I see now. What a cunt. I hope your brother realizes it as well.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:20 AM
3

Wait, why would a sister in law have a claim to an estate? I'm a bit confused, but maybe this is a cultural thing.... in Mexico, unless specified in a will in very specific terms, the priority split of an estate goes to the children, then the wife, then extended family as the case may be. Personally, from what you've said, it sounds like she is not someone you should trust and, if it were me, I would not include her in any of the discussion or division of your father's estate.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:04 AM
2

In my nation, women can get their tubes tied or permanently section as long as they are adults. They will of course , be strongly urged against it but if they are determined, they can get the procedure done. Is this illegal in places like the U.S. or Canada unless women are over 30 or something?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:59 AM
4

Alimony and child support, vast or otherwise, should be abolished. I agree that it made sense 100 years ago, but today? at the very least, the value should be drastically reduced.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:57 AM
-1

this would be technically statutory rape wouldn't it? In this context, in my nation at least, no. I understand that the laws are different in other nations though. For the record, I am from/in Mexico and the laws here on this subject are heavily dependent on context rather than a flat line in the sand. Here the context would put the teacher as not having committed a crime (I.e. no jailtime) and instead the school and whatever school acreditted her, would take care of it (I.e. she'd probably get …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:50 AM
-4

She threatened a minor Empty threats and they both knew it. coerced him into having sex That wasn't coercion, there was no force on any level. Judging by your downvotes I am fine with being the voice of reason in a bloodthirsty mob that is unwilling to consider the context. I would rather be correct than popular, little subjectivist.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:38 AM
-3

What you're doing is victim blaming. As I am not an SJW/feminist, I do not take your marxist bullshit to have any merit whatsoever. The cute little dichotomy of "victim/oppressor" is one of the most nonsensical notions and an even worse ideology that anyone can hold. Both of these people did something wrong, the teacher did something worse and should be punished more strictly, absolutely no doubt.... but to pretend the student was not complicit is insanity. Speaking as a college student (and fut…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:18 AM
-1

What's strange to me though is why you wouldn't advocate the harshest possible punishment to begin with. It's not that.... it's that people are taking her actions to be far worse than they actually are, ignoring all context. Mob mentality basically. This teacher should never hold such a position ever again. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Yep. I am in full agreement. I believe that is the bare minimum punishment she should face actually. I am a professor myself and ethical protocol states …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:15 AM
-5

You don't sound like you can have a simple conversation without spitting at your monitor. Ad hominem argument noted and dismissed. ​ It is clear that you cannot type without spazzing out like a triggered SJW/feminist. My whole premise is that context should be observed and mob mentality avoided, yours is the reverse. I don't mind being the sole voice of reason so you can keep being delusional all you like, dismissed.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 03:09 AM
3

An SJW/feminist subreddit discussing false rape accusations? this should be good.... Sorry but if you seriously just count every unproven case as true, then you are full of shit. Damn it, you beat me to the punch, do I even need to be here? The above quoted is pretty much exactly the core issue; The SJWs/feminists fail to understand that by virtue of our most important human right of all, the ethical and legal tenet known as Presumption of innocence , we always err on the side of the accusations…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:40 AM
-12

He was a child. A 17 year old ? a child? don't be a joke. This is exactly what I mean about context. because of threats The "threats" were empty and both of them knew it. Your complete refusal to acknowledge context is repugnant. Making threats to coerce sex is rape. Threats that are firstly, not credible at all, and second, are not any sort of active harm to the individual, do not qualify as "coercion". And again, the student was engaging in this of his own volition to try and gain favor throug…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:24 AM
10

People are right to be concerned that #MeToo has gone too far. It was always "too far". It was a direct form of calumny which is a crime in many nations. Calumny : 1 : a misrepresentation intended to harm another's reputation denounced his opponent for his defamatory insinuations and calumny He denounced his opponent for his defamatory insinuations and calumny 2 : the act of uttering false charges or misrepresentations maliciously calculated to harm another's reputation He was the target of calu…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:04 AM
-18

Using threats to coerce sex is rape. The "threats" were completely empty and we know this because of the context, which you are conveniently choosing to ignore. The student had the choice to go straight to administration and report the corruption. This would protect his grade and immediately put the teacher under investigation. You can pretend this was not an option but reality does not bend to your delusions. I am a professor and I am telling you directly that this is exactly what would happen …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:53 AM
18

She's right. For as much as SJWs/feminists and many women at large want to pretend otherwise, women are life's easy mode and this is demonstrably so.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:46 AM
7

This is because most men don't get scholarships or grants, so they actually have to pay for their education, whereas a single mother gets most of her schooling for free. This is correct and I have seen it myself. But, if I can make another observation, one of the side effects that trying to artificially prop up women in this manner, is that the men that do indeed make it on their own merit, are MUCH better than the women when it comes to actually getting the job done. The much harsher standards …
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:07 AM
3

.... I mean, obviously? I will admit I don't remember where I saw it, but I recall the top three reasons women lied about rape were; Didn't want to admit to cheating, boredom/attention and revenge. Add to this the 41% baseline established by Eugene Kanin's study and I have to wonder who would legitimately find the title of this anything but "... well duh?".
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:05 AM
1

Sigh, once again I have to take the downvotes and be the sole voice of reason in a bloodthirsty mob. This teacher was 27, the student was 17. I am a professor and started teaching at around 27 as well. My students have always ranged from 18 to 25. Threatening a student with lower grades in that way almost never works and when it does, you would wish it hadn't..... we are taught this very early on; Students that don't give a fuck about their grade will reject you, students that do give a fuck abo…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:01 AM
-42

Wait, I need more context here... 27-year-old Jennifer Olajire-Aro "encouraged and coerced" her student, then 17 year-old Alright that's enough, being a professor myself, I have students that are between 18 to 25 and I was one of the youngest professors that the university ever assigned to a class. I know what it's like and I know the temptation, at least as a man, I have no idea why a woman would do this. Age of consent is something that in my nation, is malleable depending on context, and in t…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:42 AM
5

First, the term "oppression" has been severely poisoned in modernity... Second, why do you need a book, just basic facts should be enough, but alright I will give it my best shot. Warren Farrell's work [Ex: Why men earn more] has done a great job of indicating just how hollow the myth of feminism is [roll credits]. As to the "black americans" line, again "oppression" is just not a valid metric. The closest I have ever heard to justify claiming that blacks are "oppressed" is that the justice syst…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:01 AM
-1

That's nice , but I'm talking about reality, not mythology.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:05 AM
-21

Color of skin They were talking about race, not skin color.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:14 AM
8

Men tend to lean to the right , which goes hand in hand with personal responsibility and individualism. Women tend to lean to the left, which goes hand in hand with collectivism and irresponsible behavior. The fact that people believe that race and sex are not strong indicators of human behavioral tendencies is absolute insanity. We have entire disciplines of medicine that corroborate these things.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:13 AM
0

Sorry, I should have checked the username more carefully before making that comment. The above quoted is a textbook example of someone that has nothing of value to present and thus, defaults back to a simple ad hominem. It is also a good indicator of SJWs/feminists if they spaz out over a non issue.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 08:30 AM
2

- Those we're communist countries, not socialist Communist countries? you mean the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was not socialist? Damn, someone better go back in time and tell Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky, they dunn fuckt up..... seriously though, don't be a joke. If you're going to do the "WELL THAT WASN'T RRRREALLLLL SOCIALISM" argument, at least don't do it in examples where you are very easily refuted. ​ More importantly, you know jack point shit about socialism/communism. Accord…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:38 AM
3

but it's not wrong Actually it is incredibly wrong. You are either a troll or a true believer in socialism. Meaning you are severely indoctrinated. None of that is the result of capitalism and in fact, the further we stray from capitalism, the worse things are for men. I have no idea why you'd attempt such a shit-tier method of presenting your arguments, but if you do it in a proper way, I will gladly debate you... when you get brutally assraped, it would be nice if you learned your lesson on ba…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:19 AM
8

This guy gets it. The problem is government is prone to being corrupt. This is in absolute terms; All systems of government have corruption..... the republic/capitalist model has the least corruption, the socialist model has the most.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:17 AM
5

Shit, wrote a long response to each of these, and explaining why this guy is probably a troll or a true believer. Then I accidentally clicked on the image and lost it all, gg commie, you win this round. tldr version If you compare any of these to what socialists nations did (Ex: Maoist China, Socialist Russia), capitalism has an incredibly good track record that brutally assrapes socialists and their little whining.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:00 AM
8

The left suffers from meme impotence.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:42 AM
4

That's correct. The women do not owe men a "debate about feminism". However, through debate and logical discourse, the meritorious nature of an ideology shines through. An outright refusal to engage in this indicates that feminism is absolute dogshit that could not handle the slightest scrutiny.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:08 AM
1

Didn't bother reading that. You did not show me where I made the extraordinary claim and thus, you are dismissed.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:02 PM
2

There is so much data Then make the counter-argument or quit wasting time . Do I have to hand walk you through this? good lord.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:01 PM
0

I don't see how this case is all that extreme. There was absolutely no evidence that implicated Brian Banks. The hardcore slut in question was trying to hide her seemingly regular gangbangs with multiple men while having a boyfriend/possible fiancee. She chose to falsely accuse Brian Banks of rape... who was given the choice of being taken to trial and facing 40 years in prison, or taking a plea bargin and spending significantly less. NOTICE THAT TRUTH NEVER COMES INTO PLAY DURING THAT. To top i…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:57 PM
1

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence That's correct. Show me where I have made an extraordinary claim. The problem is, I have yet to do that.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:50 PM
2

That's real cute, now try without the blind link. Use actual logic and reason, use excerpts if you must.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:48 PM
14

I am truly sickened by how selfish she is. While I have no doubt that she is a selfish cunt, we have to be reasonable. People have been exposed to propaganda for many decades about how circumcision is "all benefits, no downsides", which we know is bullshit. The thing is, we can fix it but it will take time to dispel the myth.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:29 PM
6

if I actually cared to prove a stranger on the internet wrong Ah so you were in fact, just spewing empty rhetoric exactly as I had said. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:27 PM
9

That's nice. Do you have a counter-argument or was the empty rhetoric it?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:24 PM
4

Sure. But that's where being over 30 helps a ton... once you've known a decent amount of women, you start to recognize some archtypes and can generally spot these with minimal interactions. It helps that SJWs/feminists are not very subtle....
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:23 PM
3

Easy, the most over-reported and maiciously falsely reported crime of all is an "extreme prevalence".
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:21 PM
1

Did not meet the prompt. Failed to respond. You are dismissed.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:19 PM
7

In an ideal world Nirvana fallacy. There is nothing idealistic about the notion of a heinous crime being prosecuted. Your attempted defense of false rape accusations is dismissed.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:18 PM
3

How the hell am I defending false rape allegations? That is very disingenuous of you and an extremely bad faith argument. There is no point in responding to you, gg.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:47 PM
7

It is incredibly relevant. No, it isn't. A heinous crime being committed must be investigated/prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The fact that it isn't is an abortion of justice. There is zero justification for defending false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:41 PM
1

Address the core argument which is what this thread and my original comment was about. After that, I will indulge your bullshit red herring.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:39 PM
6

None of that is even remotely close to being relevant. Prosecuting an extremely heinous crime MUST be done. Especially when that crime has increased in rate over time.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:32 PM
4

Nope. You have no counter-argument because it would necessarily involve you defending false rape accusations. There is nothing further to say, you got gg'd.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:31 PM
8

You're completely ignoring the other side of this. No, there is no "other side", a false rape accusation MUST become a crime and be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. There is no counter-argument to make. This absolutely must come to pass, and if it doesn't, the already extremely high rate of false rape accusations will get even higher.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:25 PM
9

Again, if the human garbage that is committing these false rape accusations is disincentivized, that can only be a good thing. Putting the ones that commit false rape accusations in prison would be a fantastic thing. A great triumph of justice.... as I said earlier, the Brian Banks case is an extreme example, but the woman in this story should have been imprisoned for a good 20 years for the things she did.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:23 PM
8

If the false rape accusing gutter trash is disincentivized, that can only be a good thing.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:16 PM
11

They were never 'alright', they were always garbage.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:56 AM
35

Or, y'know, just don't talk to the type of woman that has the necessary level of stupidity to use an asinine term like "mansplaining".
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:40 AM
9

The claim that “Hypergamy” is declining is quite naïve. Does anyone actually believe or argue that hypergamy is declining or gone? it's the worst it's been in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:04 AM
24

Incorrect. Feminism was always just a method for female hyper entitlement to be fed.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:03 AM
1

Ah okay I think I understand. You meant that the law I was thinking of does not apply in this type of proceeding. I am not in/from the U.S. so I am unfamiliar with a lot of this.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:13 AM
2

I have no idea what you mean or how the details of this work... I vaguely know about the 6th amendment being in regard to having the right to face your attacker. Is there a specific court for this? that's what you seem to be implying... I have no idea....
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:09 AM
3

False rape accusations are almost unheard of. LOL. SJWs/feminists are incredibly stupid..... rape is the crime with the highest false accusation rate of any, by a large margin and has been so for decades.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:03 AM
0

Drop the marxist buzzwords. I.e. "social" and "double standard". What you are describing is what used to be called "fraud", specifically "paternity fraud".
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:02 AM
26

Wait, I am not from the U.S. but doesn't the accused have the right to face his accuser in court? I thought this was a part of the constitution and inviolable....?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:59 AM
0

I've noticed that the desperate soyboy types will begin to project when their argument gets decimated. The white knighting doesn't get them laid because they are pathetic, and in turn, they believe other men are as weak as they are. It's quite funny, anyway gg'd little cuck, you are dismissed.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:58 AM
19

France is to give movies made by women a special subsidy bonus in a bid to counter sexism in the film industry Acquaintances, that is what socialism looks like. Government's pursuit of equality of outcome. What a joke.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:56 AM
1

Wait, why is she speaking in english? I expected her to speak hindi.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:54 AM
15

I don't understand why people still watch TV, but alright, I will give the subjectivists this one. It comes down to taste.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:54 AM
3

Alrighty, that is a valid point of contention and I do see how there is room for advocating an even greater sentence than what I suggested. ​
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:50 AM
5

I mean your whole comment was about how women don’t care for men’s personal mental problem Could you quote where I made a statement to the extent of "women don't care for men's personal mental problems"? Thanks....... spoiler: I never said that you strawmanning twat. Do not misrepresent my arguments. The crux of my argument is that men will not get a reaction like grand-scale widespread support that women get and in fact, the issue will likely be used against them. ​ Now, do you have a counter-a…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:50 AM
-6

It still happened false accusers of any kind must be harshly dealt with What's your point? do you think anyone here is advocating in favor of false rape accusations?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:46 AM
4

As I have grown older in my life, I have come to realize that women often have trouble distinguishing between their emotions and reality. Just because someone "feels" something, does not make it true.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:16 AM
42

Men having reproductive rights is something that should have happened from the beginning... would sign if I could.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:59 AM
2

Do you have an argument to present or are you content spamming non-sequiturs?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:58 AM
2

Myanmar’s army has used unfathomable levels of violence against minority Rohingya Interesting that they call them "minority Rohingya" instead of calling them what we know them to be; muslims. The muslims assaulted , raped and murdered the buddhists. The buddhists tried non-violent solutions, they tried negotiations, they tried to find a way but were met with violence at every turn. When buddhists come to the conclusion that there is no way to resolve something peacefully, they go in balls deep t…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:40 AM
1

True that, but it's about the unequal treatment of men and women by the same laws. Men and women are not the same. But, in a broad sense I agree with you. I believe men should be given the same leeway that women get. I would not want for women to be brutalized by the justice system the way men are because I wouldn't want anyone to be brutalized by the justice system that way.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:33 AM
2

The word you're looking for is "rape". Nope. As there was no penetration of the younger party, it does not constitute "rape". Corruption of a minor? "statutory rape" [Ultra asinine misnomer term] ? yes, but actual rape? no. That's not my opinion, that's how the law in the U.S. is written. To forward otherwise is to be a propagandist... that being said, what she did is absolutely a crime and she should have gotten a harsher sentence. Still, don't pretend this is something that it's not.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:31 AM
1

The "keeps her teaching certificate" part is the most fucked up thing in my mind As a part time professor let me explain why that probably happened even though I am from a different nation. Ethical protocol is incredibly strict in terms of how class is supposed to go and how to behave in the workplace, but once someone is off the clock, it relaxes significantly. And if you're off the clock and off the university, or in this case just regular school premises, it relaxes even more. The logic here …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:29 AM
5

As I am fond of saying, my grandmother told me, over 2 decades ago; Always be a gentleman towards ladies. Towards ladies. Modern women are not ladies.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:25 AM
11

As a man, don’t say you’re depressed because the person won’t help you Can confirm from personal experience and watching other men go full soyboy, thinking that they will , for some insane reason, get the tremendous outpouring support women get over anything/everything. If you are unable to handle clinical depression on your own, seek professional help. Don't talk to your buddies or worse, do NOT talk to a woman about this. When women smell blood in the water, they have a strong tendency to act …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:23 AM
3

Why not prove his innocence? See socialists? this is exactly why the legal and ethical tenet Presumption of innocence is considered one of , if not the most important human right of all. Specifically in the U.S. it is enshrined in the constitution so it is strange to me that it is being eroded this way. Presumption of innocence means we always err on the side of the story being false until proven otherwise. I get that socialist nations don't give a fuck about pesky human rights like due process …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:21 AM
8

My response to her is; Nobody cares about your delusional ranting. Move along. Not a single thing she said is meritorious, it's all subjectivist drivel.... emotional garbage. The near totality of men have an extremely strong , primal urge to protect women from harm if something is going down. This is being conditioned out of men at large at a surprisingly fast rate..... good, when men stop putting the interests of women before their own, we will see a huge shift. As for the women? let the punish…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:15 AM
23

The bill’s supporters contend that this would make child support obsolete I like it already. but the left-leaning opposition and women’s groups fear that the bill would harm women. And here we see leftists/feminists reveal themselves; they don't care about the child on the topic of CHILD SUPPORT. Those clowns are pieces of trash.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:11 AM
14

It's almost as if the biological imperative is a thing....
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:29 AM
6

Dude... Everything that you just listed comes under the title 'I don't trust/like/hate women. "Misogyny" is by definition "the hatred of women". None of what I described was "hatred of women". Even the hatred of specific women is not "hatred of women", it's hatred borne out of what those women did against the men. If males didn't feel this resentment towards females False assertion is false. Stop being a fanatic. Not sure if troll or just retarded....
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:28 AM
4

A complete abortoin of justice.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:17 AM
4

The Manosphere for the most part do hate women. I've been around many of the groups that form "the manosphere" for a very long time. No, "the manosphere" do not "hate women" for the most part. ​ Some guys avoid women as a precaution, some guys are repulsed, some guys reject women, some guys hate specific women.... none of this aligns with your statement. Unless you are going to very different places than I have, you appear to be completely wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:16 AM
2

You are raving again. Projection. I have always supported the presumption of innocence. Demonstrably false. Either you "misspoke" in previous comments, or you are trying to play it off now. I have explained numerous times exactly what presumption of innocence constitutes and you have spoken against it. "Serious rape researchers" means people professionally qualified in relevant subjects who have published their results in relevant peer-reviewed journals). That's nice. When you give zero examples…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:13 AM
2

The false accusers should have been expelled and brought up on criminal charges of some type. This was not an accident, it was done deliberately, in premeditated fashion and with malice.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:24 AM
6

Wow I thought this was a meme, it wasn't. This is so out of character for Megumin, this is more of an Aqua line than a Megumin line.... then again Konosuba has shit-tier writing so I guess it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:18 AM
4

The "manosphere" does not "hate women". The concept of "misogyny" is a myth in modernity in western nations on any meaningful scale. It doesn't exist.... misandry on the other hand, is incredibly prevalent.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:17 AM
160

Alright let's be as fair as possible; The Brian Banks case is currently one of, if not the most extreme outlier with maximum scummy behavior from the false rape accuser and maximum ineptitude by the justice system. Most false rape accusations are not this extreme.... THAT BEING SAID, false rape accusations absolutely must become a crime. That is the only way the extreme prevalence of them can be dealt with. A fair sentence would be the same sentence the man she would have sent to jail would have…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:16 AM
1

"sometimes yes, sometimes no"? do you think the burglar is Batman or something? The burglar in that scenario [breaking and entering], further committing a violent crime like rape, will leave an enormous amount of physical evidence that will implicate him in the crime. There is never an instance where he doesn't, period. You are incredibly wrong. Now that you've been proven very wrong in that instance, let's address your earlier deflection.... Who are people like me? Question not delineated, valu…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:08 AM
2

Convictions being 2% of rape reports to police in the US is from Bureau of Justice statistics, By your own argument, that would mean 98% of women that did that are false rape accusers. You are obviously twisting some innocuous number into a falsity or, perhaps you are referencing the speculative numbers forwarded... false rape accusations are at a baseline of 41% which would place them as easily the most over-reported, over-convicted crime of all, hands down. Kanin's 1995 study is a curiosity be…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 04:38 AM
2

You sound like a psychopath, not just an invert. Possibly. When I applied to university, I was forced to take a full psychometric exam alongside all the other applicants. Two things about my results stood out, highest IQ of all applicants (it was more that everyone else sucked rather than me having impressive score), and severe anti-social tendencies. I got in but was sent to talk to what I assume was a psychologist , doubt she was a psychiatrist. She asked me questions, made me draw things and …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:59 AM
1

I'm anti-social to the utmost extreme. I do not want to interact with anything, ever.... these cats helped me do that by virtue of keeping a lot of pests, including some humans, away and killing those that crossed a certain threshold. I do not want to interact with cats because as I said, I am ultra anti-social, but I can respect that the cats served a function and they did their job with a level of efficiency I would have thought impossible. when they interact or fuck it's noisy as hell. I didn…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:02 AM
1

Answer the question. Do you contend that the burglar would leave no evidence behind?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 02:54 AM
1

Cats embrace a level of brutality we can't even fathom, and I think that's part of the reason humans love cats. I agree. I dislike pets of all types, but have a respect for cats for the reasons you mentioned... I was once renting a small place at the edge of a gated community and in the small "yard" in front, some cats began to congregate. They killed absolutely everything else that would even come close to that area; Bugs, rodents, birds, etc. I hated the bugs, rodents and birds so I started pu…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 02:23 AM
2

Cats DO NOT want to kill all humans and eat them. I once read online that of all pets that humans keep, in the case the owner dies in his home, cats are the quickest to start devouring the corpse and the least likely to try to "help" the seemingly wounded human. Cats are ruthless man.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 02:12 AM
1

As I said, they have the podium and they set the rules of the debate. There is no "podium" nor "debate". SJWs and feminists are putrid scoriae that must be opposed, not just for the good of men and boys everywhere, but even women themselves. Those groups are hyper-cancer and being a cuck is not the way to defeat them.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 02:05 AM
0

It is possible for someone to be raped, but be unable to provide enough evidence for a conviction to be warranted. The distinction here is that people like you have a very broad, very nonsensical definition of "rape". If a woman is raped, say, brutally beaten and taken sexually by a burglar that broke into in her home... that is going to leave ample evidence 100% of the time. If the man is detained, the evidence will be very consistent with the story. Or do you contend that the burglar will leav…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:48 AM
2

at least a cat in a missile silo can keep the mice from chewing on cables and what not. Touché.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:46 AM
-1

it doesn't sit well with me to use the term "false accusations" for accusations which are true, but supported by insufficient evidence for a conviction. u wot m8? If the evidence is not consistent with the claim, or if there is no meaningful evidence to demonstrate that the claim is true, it is perfectly rational to declare the claim false. We believe facts and evidence, not stories, especially not stories that go against the facts and evidence....
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:48 PM
2

I have refuted your premise several times already. You can delude yourself as hard as you want, presumption of innocence is absolute, and it is that way for a reason..... it is the best way to minimize the justice system railroading innocent men, for it is better for 10 guilty men to go free, than 1 man be imprisoned under false pretenses. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:44 PM
2

You believe You couldn't even get one sentence into your premise before being completely wrong. No, you do not "believe", you err on the side of the accusation being false. That's called Presumption of innocence, a legal and ethical tenet of incomparable value. The rest of your argument, as it built from that initial bullshit notion, is dismissed. The law has to have a presumption of innocence as a matter of practicality. However all the jury have to do is only return a guilty verdict IF the bur…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:13 PM
2

This is hardly different from the way it was in the West until recently. Nope. Also if you have to travel back in time hundreds of years to have a point, your point is dogshit. Do you believe that women were oppressed in USA and UK in 1950s? "oppressed" is a worthless leftist buzzword. The proper word for how islam operates is subjugation. Islam, by doctrinal mandate, subjugates women as wards of men. That's not my opinion, that is quranic doctrine and practice. "The west" is not a valid argumen…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:18 PM
1

The mental gymnastics there are lengthy.... which is a bit funny because even with all of that, the guy I'm responding to is still wrong. It isn't complicated; The very basis of modern justice is **Presumption of innocence** which indicates that we must err on the side of the accusation being false until or unless proven otherwise in a court of law. This supersedes anything and everything else...... it is literally the most important human right of all because of how essential it is for justice …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:14 PM
2

Woman is not subservient to man at all times under Sharia. Ahem, I've read a lot of the quran and the hadiths.... the above quoted has to be a joke. Islam has women as wards to men. That's not my opinion, it is part of quranic abrogation and anyone with a cursory understanding of islam knows this.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:59 PM
0

Why do you use the phrase "false accusation" Because the premise of "Presumption of innocence" is PRESUMPTIVE of , well, all men being innocent until proven otherwise. This means we err on the side of an accusation being false until or unless evidence proves otherwise. This isn't my opinion or my "take", that's what presumption of innocence is ... y'know, the most important legal and ethical tenet of all? yeah.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:57 PM
14

who lost his high-profile job with CBC after more than 20 women accused him of sexual misconduct. And there was evidence to support these claims...? no, of course not. F: "20 women can't all be lying" Myth: "So 20 women got raped, or sexually assaulted yet there is zero evidence from any of those incidents? none at all...? get the fuck out of here. False rape accusations MUST be charged as a crime. This will not stop until such acts are prosecuted as they should be.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:45 PM
22

Let’s be honest – in the end, this is down to male violence Starting with a blind conclusion is called a presumptuous hypothesis/diagnosis, that's not necessarily a "bad thing", as long as the following material follows this line of logic and either demonstrates the hypothesis to be true or false before the end. We know already – don’t we? – that there are epidemic proportions of self-harm and eating disorders among girls. Okay, so then men do not come into play.... hypothesis false, that was fa…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:39 PM
3

I'm not sure how this squares with islam's doctrine of a woman being fully subservient to a man at all times by quranic [sharia] law. Hmmm.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:36 PM
1

Juror : Nobody has to prove [innocence]. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. The defendant doesn't even have to open his mouth. That's in the Constitution. -- 12 Angry Men.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:34 PM
67

Feminists and logic go together like cats and nuclear facilities.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:32 PM
1

I would not rock the boat. Remember that you are guilty by default and things can go bad very quickly. I know exactly where you're coming from and I've said it for over 20 years; The women whine about so-called "consent" and "no means no", but my observation, of women towards me and women towards other men, is that they are far more likely to violate a man's personal space than a man doing the same to a woman. I've also heard a ton of stories , and yeah I know that that is anecdotal, that indica…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:16 AM
5

Who the fuck writes this inhumane garbage into law? I'm going to go out on a limb and say very cucked husbands that made it to the seat of power.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:13 AM
2

Child support and alimony should be completely abolished. They kind of made sense 100 years ago, but not today....
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:12 AM
0

The presumption of innocence is the legal principle. A fundamental legal and ethical principle, yes. Your presumption of guilt is bizarre. Actually that would be what the other person is advocating for. "guilty until proven innocent" was not suggested by anyone except yourself Nope. Anything that isn't "We must err on the side of the accusation being false until or unless it is determined otherwise." is abhorrent and directly contradictory to presumption of innocence. Conviction for rape occurs …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:06 AM
22

BBC is apparently the U.K.'s CNN. Just a propaganda outlet for the lowest common denominator.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:24 AM
1

Chick has a point. I'm sure all of us have known women that continually pick the worst men, again and again.... then wonder why things always go sour.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:23 AM
2

That's nice. Was that a movement proper? was it "feminism"? the answer is no. You can keep reaching though, I don't mind.... remember that reality does not bend to your desires, subjectivist notions are always valueless.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:03 AM
-1

In other words, you had no counter-argument. Not surprised, gg'd kid.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:02 AM
2

your last bit about deeming all rape accusations false until proven is a little too far First of all, it's not "my bit", that's literally the basis for jurisprudence, the foundation of modern justice across the board. Second, "guilty until proven innocent" is an atrocity. And finally; Erring on the side of the story being a false accusation is the best way to do things, it doesn't mean it is perfect , but it absoltuely, overwhelmingly has the greatest chance of delivering actual justice during p…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:01 AM
3

A girl I was talking to at work, young mother of about 22 with a boy of 6 or so, was telling me that she is terrified of exactly this because her son can be destroyed on the whim of some "attention seeking brat". I once incorrectly "remembered" that Karen Straughan said she had become the way she was because of what she saw happen to her son, that's not true that she became GirlWritesWhat for that reason, but it is true that she did observe the mistreatment her son got and it fueled her quest to…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:19 AM
0

No idea who that is, don't care to know. If you believe my argument is wrong, make the counter-argument, scrub.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:11 AM
36

It was the fate of the Feminist Movement that hate tore through it. "Hate" is an abstract notion, but if you want to go by that "metric"... feminism was a "hate movement" from the very beginning. It began in the late 1960s/early 1970s through the work of 4 incredibly misandric women. we at times assume that all rape accusations are false. We should , everyone should. It's called Presumption of innocence ; Every man is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. No exceptions. This means we a…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:35 AM
0

I need advice as to how I can proceed. Do you really want to know? because I will tell you what to do to get the best outcome, but this subreddit has a lot of "feel-good" bullshitters that will tell you what you want to hear rather than what you need to hear. Alright; If you really want to know, she has given you an ultimatum, every submit to her control or get fucked. As you can see you cannot win this engagement and the odds of her reporting you to the school anyway are very high, even if you …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:32 AM
0

The answer is; I don't give a fuck and you shouldn't either. The tantrums that women throw are their own and the best revenge is to live well.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:25 AM
4

Exactly. I would absolutely love to see them go it on their own. Hell, I would even donate to some sort of "woman only" city, as long as I got to watch it online or something, it would be top notch entertainment.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:04 PM
1

Nope. You can pretend that incentivization through negative reinforcement of some behavior and positive reniforcement of other leading to a tendency to select this seemingly "easy way out" just "isn't a thing", but you'd have to be delusional to believe that. I'd like to avoid just out and out calling this sexual abuse, but it's very difficult not to.... these boys are groomed, indoctrinated .... maybe if they were adults it would be different, boys and young teens though, they are susceptible t…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 11:17 AM
2

I didn't want to go to this but you forced me to. These boys are being sexually groomed. They are being lied to, they are being indoctrinated. They are being told that there is something wrong with them. They are being mistreated just for being boys. When offered a "way out", they are incentivized to take it. I agree with what you're saying, but these are not normal boys and cannot be judged as normal boys.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 11:02 AM
1

Teenage boys aren't thinking about the future. They have also probably heard fake stories about how things will be so much better in every way , including sex.... obviously those are lies. I suspect millenial and Gen Z boys aren't as ultra hyper sexual as my generation (Gen X)....
/r/MensRights19/09/18 10:43 AM
2

a 15-year-old girl was able to swan into any pub or nightclub without being challenged. She could find an older boyfriend with a car and a job and perhaps a flat of his own. She could join him on holidays and prepare to settle down and start a family, or not, according to her wish. Independence and autonomy were hers already. At 15 I was facing a decade of low-paid work and student drudgery before I could assemble the paraphernalia of the fully-fledged bourgeois male: a degree, an income, a mort…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:43 AM
-2

Although I know I am an extreme minority on this subreddit on this, and I also know that this stance does not have the logical strength as other contentious stances I take, I don't think men need to get "rape shelters" or "domestic violence houses" at all. I don't think women should have them either but I know that modern nations are incredibly gynocentric so those are never going to go away. Rather than seek temporary shelter, if a woman becomes violent in any meaningful way, leave her or kick …
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:37 AM
15

My father told me that everyone will pretend to be your friend or offer you platitudes if prompted, but he said that when the time comes, you will always be alone and you must learn to stand on your own two feet. Never expect that anyone will come to help you. He was right. I asked why women, specifically my sister, had it so easy if she was so lazy and dumb. And he said "Because she's a woman." I didn't understand back then but I completely understand now. My sister will never be alone, no matt…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:33 AM
1

They were also ineffective at getting their goals accomplished.... they were quite cowardly and hypocritical as well. For as atrocious as feminism is, the suffragettes were worse.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:30 AM
2

The only effect the propagandist feminist/SJW articles have are to make me wonder if I should start only helping boys and men. She literally makes me reach the opposite conclusion. I already know women are the ultra hyper freebie-getting advantaged elite, the leisure class, so why help some woman ?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:29 AM
3

Possibly the most ludicrous headline I've ever read. Give them a week, tops.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:28 AM
54

I can't wait until he's accused. I do not wish a false rape accusation to any man, but once a man says something as stupid as that, it's only a matter of time before someone decides to cash in on it. Guilty until proven innocent, these are your words Mr. Biden, remember them carefully.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:28 AM
1

Then don't buy one. REEEEEEE. The world should comfort to my sensibilities, don't you understand?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:27 AM
6

Horse face has a point. She may need 'bigger' men after all the knowledge she's had.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:27 AM
1

In tatters? Says who? As I am an extreme enemy of feminism/SJWs, it is important to stay in the loop. If I recall, Bitch Media has been running increasingly less sympathetic content on the witch hunt. Jezebel , another key feminist shithole, has released content decrying the movement not that long ago I think, it was incredibly stupid "non criticism" but you can't expect substance from feminists/SJWs.... I believe it was some bullshit along the lines of "white feminists" and TERFs were brought u…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:45 AM
0

That's a funny way to spell more retarded. LOL. 10/10, legit had a hearty laugh... also, it's funny cuz it's true.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:36 AM
0

the MRM shouldn't be defending vices I would argue pounding the daylights out of a doll qualifies as much less of a vice than pounding a female stranger you picked up at a bar. Much less dangerous too. it should be destroying privilege Marxist detected.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:02 AM
1

How is this a men’s rights issue? [cue Seinfeld music]
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:00 AM
1

I, for one, would never put my dick into a doll, if several men had been ejaculating into it Nor would I, but I know lots of guys that would. I see nothing wrong with this and anyone that does, is an SJW/feminist-tier piece of human garbage, putrid scoriae to the extreme.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:36 PM
2

hould the law treat sluts like virgins? No. Actually in Mexico (My nation) this variables make a huge difference. A 15 ytear old girl that has had 100 men know her "biblically", is not really taken as an issue if the 101st man was 18-21.... on the other hand, the law in all of Mexico's states and in federal law clearly indicates that a woman of pure character, if taken sexually through the use of seduction and promise, has committed a fairly serious crime. ​ Not all crimes are the same. Each one…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 07:19 AM
3

Two things, that story is riddled with holes. She alternates between her and her friend being wise to the world and them being completely inept on the level of infants. And second.... unfortunately, young people but especially young women, are having more sex and at an earlier age than before.... at least in my nation and I am pretty sure it is also true in California. This is one of the reasons I invoke context so often; In the old days, a 14 year old girl was taken to be a virgin or at least v…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:11 AM
-1

The problem is when you prejudge an individual based on the group they belong to. That's not a "problem". Every single human that has ever existed or will ever exist does the above quoted every single day of their life. It's called pattern recognition/statistical significance...... your argument is without merit, however I understand that you are a subjectivist and merit is not something you are able to consider. ​ So stereotyping is a tool. It's not inherently good or bad. Stereotypes are a goo…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:06 AM
5

R/chromosomes gets a lot of hate from this sub "Hate"? more like justified condemnation. this sub can go from mensrights to anti women very quickly I have never once seen an "anti woman" argument presented here. The issue is that a lot of soyboys/"male feminists" are desperate to virtue signal and will take any level of justified criticism as some sort of "attack on women", such desperate virtue signaling is commonplace nowadays. For ex: Awhile back a guy was talking about whether he should get …
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:03 AM
36

forced to shut down for "lack of hygiene" It's a fucking brothel.... actual women , regardless of how "hygienical" they may try to be, if they are prostitutes, it is very difficult for them to be more hygienic than the dolls in question. Since the dolls are not tissue, viruses for example will have a lower tendency to transmit. In fact, all but the most robust infectious virus would not survive long enough to be a meaningful threat in the doll context. Authorities are concerned over hygiene at t…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:05 AM
1

Even more proof that a father serves a crucial role in children's live I believe the general understanding of this is that the women's optimal role is as a support structure for the family unit. The man's optimal role is to provide mentorship, guidance and structure to his children who are (apparently) innately drawn to their father when confusion, fear , anger or general distress occurs. Or at least that's my understanding, but I will point out I have no children, I don't plan on ever having a …
/r/MensRights17/09/18 01:13 AM
1

Hair and ofcourse skin is the same on both. False. Extremely so in "skin" , specifically the tegumentary apparatus has notable differences in metabolic rate, form and function. Tegumentary tissue in men is more coarse, efficient when metabolizing and more resistance to homeostasis breach. It is nearly unbelievable that you would make such a statement. The distinction in hair is less significant so that one I am fine with conceding. Those do not automatically set the parameters of what is male or…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:39 PM
11

So you're saying .... [insert Cathy Newman gif]
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:35 PM
4

you might be the actual issue brother. Nope. Logic and reason are unaffected by the popularity of an argument.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:59 PM
-1

There are facts and there is sexism. If you believe the stated facts are without merit, make the counter-argument. Go ahead. ​ I'm sorry you're not interested in arguing in good faith ​ Projection. But then we already knew you had nothing from the beginning.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:40 PM
1

In other words, female rapists must be doing it for the good of the world? And I made that argument when? oh yeah never. You're a complete waste.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:38 PM
-6

Wide generalizations about all parents Firstly, generalizations , if following statistical significance are not only correct, but necessary. Second, I don't remember ever making any statement about "all parents". Strawman argument detected. I'm pretty sure that counts as "tearing down". Nope. Ideas cannot be "torn down", they can only be refuted or reinforced. Not to mention calling single mothers extra failures. Ah I see. Facts bother you, understood.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:31 PM
1

Context was taken into consideration bro. Nope. You are highly deranged so there is no point in going over this with you... again if you want to do the hardcore autistic thing of going over each state's laws word for word, I am down... but I have double checked and you are demonstrably wrong. You seem to believe we need to treat men and women differently I don't "believe" that, that is the only logical position to hold. Anything else is pure nonsense. Men and women are not the same. for a simila…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:31 PM
1

Please, this is rape. Stop trying to downplay it. No one is "downplaying" anything. Context matters and the more you pretend otherwise, the more it is necessary to make that statement. Context matters , this is not debatable.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:26 PM
1

You're completely wrong Nope. I double checked and it appears your statement was complete bullshit, or perhaps you just didn't understand the law. This was a 14 year old. .... are you mentally ill? my opening comment specifically said "This is absolutely a crime". The point is that not all crimes are equal.... wow, I may have overestimated you.... gg.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:24 PM
-12

Can we make this less about tearing people down Who did I "tear down"? No. Ideas are what is being presented. People, in this context are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:21 PM
-1

It's not a strawman when you imply I don't make arguments based on "implications", I make my arguments very clear precisely because I know people like you will go to dire lengths to attempt to misrepresent them. Your attempt is noted and dismissed.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:19 PM
1

Except most, if not all, state's law make exceptions for situations of a person in a "position of power" Pretty sure that is completely wrong and utterly nonsensical. You may be conflating an aggravant or alternative circumstance with a functional cause........ also, lol? I googled a couple of states to see if that was true. Unless I am very lucky and got the ones that do not have this so-called "exception" or your bullshit has been detected. People with your level of confirmation bias are a com…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:15 PM
-2

That's why I use the phrase "an aspect of totalitarianism", but you can pretend otherwise in your strawman argument, I don't mind.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:12 PM
1

Your argument is completely without merit as this is not the law. Yeah I guess THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE is totally irrelevant here /s It is a definition only primarily used as a way of tracking crime statistics. That's nice, completely irrelevant. We can go state by state and my point will remain solid. People like you however, are spectacularly wrong.... your type seems to be completely unable to understand a point of principle.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:49 PM
-4

You seem to be some kind of anarchist Nope. Classical liberal. ​ I get that to you socialists everyone appears to be an "anarchist" given that they reject your premise of "totalitarianism is the best system" but most people do not believe government should subjugate parents as vassals of the state, obviously.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:29 PM
1

As you so like to say, nice strawman. Nope. You are free to pretend that that's the case though, I don't mind.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:21 PM
0

sexist So your argument is that the Department of Justice is "sexist"? LOL? Well at least your nonsense was amusing.... dismissed.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:31 PM
1

when is it not in violation of established protocol to rape your students? Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. It seems your argument is complete nonsense. Perhaps you wish to reconsider your position?
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:24 PM
76

Getting knocked up is not an accomplishment, in fact it is more often an utter failure. This is cranked up to 11 if the woman is a single mother. Get back in line and wait your turn like everyone else, you hyper entitled simpleton.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:59 PM
1

Actually my argument was laid out earliear in a clear and concise manner. Leftists like you have no counter argument so you waste time. That is your only move. You have nothing of value to say, dismissed.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:43 PM
1

Your projection is not an argument. ​ You have nothing of value to say.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:40 PM
1

Not an argument. Such drivel is without merit.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:37 PM
1

That is not an argument, little one.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:37 PM
1

many people claim the phone app is better than the PC interface. If true, that is some hardcore incompetence..... how do they make a PC interface that is worse than a mobile phone interface?
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:17 PM
-4

To quote... well...you /rolleyes To say that you are , the maximum possible level of incorrect, would basically be about right. You present no substantive arguments and instead , select a minor tangential statement about a topic you are WILDLY outmatched in, what a horrendous performance............ you are a fool to an extreme degree and have nothing of value to present, as evidenced by that abysmal comment. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:55 PM
0

Evidence is irrelevant? Wait let me see if I am following your argument; You contend that "history is evidence"? LOL? what pray tell, is it evidence of exactly? To be specific, we're talking about history on a grand-scale, not in terms of individuals.... what is your argument to support such a claim? Absent evidence History of that type is not evidence. It is a recount of incidents passed. I am somewhat confused to whether or not you believe that , for example, an incident occurring 100 years ag…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:50 PM
-2

Hardly baseless Accusing someone of using a logical fallacy without indicating in precise terms what fallacy and where it occurred, is a baseless claim. You have nothing of value to present. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:42 PM
-1

Didn't bother reading any of that facemash. The drivel of putrid scoriae has no merit.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:40 PM
-2

Baseless accusation is baseless. Try again, little one.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:39 PM
-2

Oh man, this is going to be fun. Mmm, I love a challenge. ​ I emphasized the last bit to reiterate that I have already conceded that there may be elements of truth in a stereotype. Hmm? I already addressed that. Your opening move is garbage, it does not bode well for the rest of your contentions. How can you discuss O_o .... you understand that all hypothesis, all knowledge, all discussion begins not from a question but by a premise that has been put forward, correct? you don't appear to underst…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:55 PM
-1

I'm not countering Then you have nothing of value to say.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:20 PM
0

legal treatment "Legal status" and "legal treatment" are not the same thing. Not to mention what is being discussed is neither of those. We're talking about the evaluation of a case performed by jurisprudence. I.e. CONTEXT. That thing that your type appears unable to understand. You did when you wrote "because men and women are not the same." Men and women are demographics. Demographic : "A particular sector of a population. " Want to try again ? maybe this time try to present something of merit…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:19 PM
0

That's a nice throwaway account. ​
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:59 PM
-9

Yes every individual needs to be treated as an individual, but within reason. What prey tell does that mean exactly? ​ that doesn't mean that the state shouldn't enforce boundaries on what you can and can't do with your children. Very well. For a socialist, you have done a fine job presenting your argument, and I commend you on it.... you are extremely wrong, but at least you had the capacity to actually formulate a premise which is very much not the norm among your type. An explanation then; I …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:57 PM
1

You have absolutely no understanding of mental health or depression it seems. Again, make the counter-argument. You are making vacuous declarations by fiat, like the foolish rank amateur that you are. Or how sometimes people... You do not speak for "people", you speak for yourself. The argument that "people suffering from illness should seek profesisonal help" stands firm. Do you have a counter-argument or are you just wasting my time?
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:50 PM
0

I’m Pro-Abortion because it does reduce the amount of Single Mothers in this world Actually it does not do that at all. The current methods of contraception are more than enough to ensure that pregnancy is never an "accident", taking a human life is simply unjustifiable in all instances except the woman's life being endangered at which point , fair enough but those are the extreme minority of cases. No child deserves to grow up with a single mother. While I agree on that point, single motherhood…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:41 PM
0

Being the same is not a requirement for having the same legal status. "Legal status" is not at play here. In how many ways do I have to directly prompt you socialists that CONTEXT MATTERS? is it really going over your head ...? it's not complicated. Men and women are also not the same within their demographics. Who gives a fuck about demographics. It does not matter. I challenge you to find a difference between men and women that's universally true for all people Easy; Men can inseminate women, …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:35 PM
-7

You couldn't be more wrong. Yawn. If you are so confident, make the counter-argument and quit wasting time... unless, you have nothing of value to present, which is most likely the case.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:30 PM
0

You're an idiot Yawn. You are indistinguishable from an SJW/feminist.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:29 PM
-4

The implicit question There was no implicit nor explicit question. You are projecting and/or strawmanning. I'd suggest there are two issues Sure, let's see if these issues have any merit. The truth/falsity of stereotypes All stereotypes have some level of truth to them. It is reality that creates the stereotypes after all. First point is just false. The application of a general stereotype to an individual Subjective argument is subjective. stereotypes are not always false. Stereotypes are always…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:28 PM
-2

your narcissism is showing. It would only be narcissism if I were wrong. I am not and the responses to this proved my point several times over. Yawn, your desperate attempt is refuted and dismissed.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:57 AM
9

"Molested" has come to mean nearly any interaction and I consider the term nearly without merit at this point, however.... kissing, touching, cuddling, and oral sex Kissing? context dependent and thus unclear. Touching? Lol, get fucked with that nonsense. Cuddling? ok highly suggestive and may be indicative of inappropriate behavior, this is a red flag but not enough. Performing oral sex on an 11 year old ? Lol, holy shit, why even include the other three? this is enough. If he was , say 16, or …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:55 AM
1

What does logic have to do with it? Illogical arguments are without merit. It's just nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:48 AM
1

Maybe this is the start they needed No. "The start they needed" is a subjective point and has no merit. The correct path , if they truly wanted to change the rules, was lobbying against them in a rational way. ​ > then the companies should make women not wear any including earrings ​ Tabula rasa argument, not surprised. So let's cut to the chase; **Do you believe men and women are the same?** if yes, your argument is refuted, if no , you are mentally ill. > Its complete bullshit to have one set …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:45 AM
4

Wait what? the rape of a young girl on various occasions between 1994 and 1999 .... and there were no bruises, lacerations or signs of any type? ever? Not to mention a 5 year affair and just, no one ever noticed?... they don't give this girl's age but I'm betting that there is absolutely no truth to that complaint or the other. People that have zero understanding of how actual rapes go down, fabricate very nonsensical stories like that one. The women that did this should be incarcerated for the …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 11:35 AM
9

I have yet to hear a logical argument on how "stereotypes" are in any way a negative thing.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 10:36 AM
-8

It's called empathy or sympathy Actually that would neither be empathy , nor sympathy. It would be virtue signaling.... if you truly had empathy/sympathy for such an individual, you would advise them to get medical attention rather than think blowing smoke up their ass, thereby enabling them, is doing them anything other than a disservice. Coddling or enabling someone that is suffering illness, but especially mental illness, is one of the worst things you can do.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 10:25 AM
0

It doesn't matter how people act..? Correct. What matters is the quality of the argument. In other words, substance > style.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:57 AM
2

That was just me seeing through the computer screen and recognizing the human at the other end Your perception was very sharp. I am very physically and mentally exhausted right now, but even now, I'd like to think I am able to maintain composure... I was wrong. Again I was very impressed and there's no way the same person could have picked up on that. I'm not trying to "own" you. Obviously. My point is, the way you are typing is completely different than before. But very well I may be reading to…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:43 AM
-8

The only troll here is you. Yawn. I have no interest in the opinion of a cowardly socialist. Reality does not bend to your delusions.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:38 AM
3

stop caring about shitting on feminism Mischaracterization to the extreme. Feminism is unjustifiable. Refuting feminist drivel can only be a good thing. So many of you are so jaded that you don't even realize how much you act exactly like the stereotypical evil feminists you're hating on. False equivalence. It doesn't matter how people "act", what matters is the quality of the argument presented. Generally speaking, people that support the MRM make good arguments. In absolute terms, feminists al…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:36 AM
-13

Not sure if troll.... That argument is unassailable, then again given that you did not make the counter argument, it is obvious you have nothing of merit to present. I understand that there are socialists that frequent this subreddit and in the mind of a socialist, government is god-like and always the solution to every problem. Overreach is a good thing and totalitarianism is the best thing.... in the mind of a socialist at least. Non retarded individuals understand that stripping parents of th…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:26 AM
-3

For some people it's hard to admit a problem in the first place. That's not the product of clinical depression, that's just being inept. Mental health isn't something you can handle yourself In some cases, you are correct. Ergo, if you are unable to handle your own problems, seek professional help and get treatment. you need a strong support network of family and friends. LOL NO. If you have an illness, you go to see a medical practitioner for treatment.... you appear to be confused. "Fashionabl…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:22 AM
0

many of the theories we now associate with feminism proper were developed by these certifiable loons That's correct. Actually the cornerstones of feminism, such as "patriarchy" were nideed crafted by absolutely delusional psychos like Valerie Solanas, Andrea Dworkin, Gloria Steinem and the benignly delusional Betty Friedan. These are the 4 architects of feminism that are responsible for creating the actual movement..... they were all crazy. What sort of theories did these nuts develop? They argu…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:01 AM
1

There are more men on BOTH ends of the bell curve, we are more variable. Were feminists stupid enough to try to "disappear" a study with results that are already common knowledge? I wouldn't put it past them, but the title is probably exaggerating.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:52 AM
3

To some it might sound too high, but I would guess, just speculating, that the true number is actually significantly higher than 60%. I say this because I had an acquaintance, not a friend but still, an acquaintance that was a cop. I asked about this and he told me that it is very common for women to randomly add "rape" to charges , or just out and out falsely accuse someone in a very transparent way. Apparently standard protocol is to talk them down without writing up the false accusation. This…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:46 AM
-2

I never said rape. That's cute but irrelevant. Your core premise was tabula rasa in nature; The notion that humans are all "the same" but are "programmed" through social interactions. Such a notion is complete bullshit in every regard. I am talking about sexual assault of a minor. Bzzzt, shifting the goalposts. You had not made such an argument before this. Do not pretend otherwise. Your argument is noted and dismissed. Good lord, if you are going to attempt an ironic echo, you need to do a lot …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:43 AM
-2

Disregarding for now your Tabula Rasa nonsense.....I'm not sure about "many years in jail" but I would agree on revocation of the teaching license, provided the context indicates she was in violation of established protocol. Yes to the sex offender registry. I believe this woman was given too much leniency... however I do not believe that a teacher eating a female student out would lead to what you are suggesting. In fact, I am unsure but, isn't that not even classified as rape of any type in th…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 08:06 AM
2

Therapists sometimes talk about "parallel process," which in this case refers to how a client who is hard to understand can create in you the thing that they're feeling. Pretty sure that's called transference, but yeah I get what you mean. She's in pain and not acting considerately. While that is absolutely a factor to be considered, I have seen her once a week for, quite awhile now. She has never once shown any kind of gratitude, I don't mean money, just a "thanks, this really helps" ONCE , wou…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:55 AM
-1

Why dont you actually ans... I have zero interest in anything you say. On the plus side, complete fools like you have forced me to lower my standard of what to expect from people on reddit. Congratulations. gg.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:52 AM
2

men and women are the same. You are mentally ill. Men and women are not the same, this isn't an opinion, this is a hard axiom that is not subject to debate. men and women are the same there are differences men and women are the same there are differences 10/10..... /s
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:47 AM
-4

Men and women should be treated equally. On what grounds? Do you believe men and women are the same? if not your argument is garbage, if yes, you are mentally ill. ​ Give me one reason why one should be treated higher then the other I don't remember ever having made that argument. Maybe try addressing the actual points I made next time, little one. ​ give me one god damned fuck of a reason that one sex is not to be given the same legal treatment as the other. Easy, because men and women are not …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:40 AM
1

Empathy fatigue is a thing I am very familiar with. I hadn't thought of it like that, but that is a very solid summary of what is going on here. I could be refreshed if she had just showed the slightest bit of gratitude, but nope... I try to make a very conscious practice in my own life of not reaching that limit with people You are very wise to do so. I have a lot of patience and endurance, but I have just about had it. I seriously need a vacation....
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:39 AM
-3

rape is rape. Actually no. There is something called CONTEXT. How can other adults be making such idiotic arguments without any irony or facetiousness...? context isn't some high level , ephemeral concept.... even a child knows what context is. In my opinion, this is one of the biggest problems the MRM has. People like you that spew absolute garbage on a regular basis and undermine actual comptent arguments deriving from the movement. If you believe that one is worse then the other, then you are…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:36 AM
0

I'm sure I will be fine by tomorrow. Yesterday I performed a root canal on an impoverished local woman. I had been performing treatments for extremely low costs because, well, she is poor. I am not a root canal specialist so it was very difficult, I made no real money from it, and like every other time, she was not appreciative of it, I am charging her 1/10th of what the normal cost is and she STILL acted indignant over the cost.... fuck. She's not unemployed , she has a job but jobs don't pay m…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:30 AM
2

Repost... and still in the the first page, come on man.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:27 AM
2

"Yeah but Count Dankula, Alex Jones , Milo and Sargon are like this chick x1,000." -- Jack Dorsey
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:27 AM
0

I'm impressed that you , or anyone, noticed a difference. Terrible week + sick = Not a good mood.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:25 AM
1

Hmmm, this goes against several things I know about cancer and how it develops. I will look into it and see if I need to correct these aspects, thanks.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:15 AM
-12

Not sure why anyone should care to begin with.... handle yourself if you are able, otherwise seek professional help and get treatment for whatever the issue is.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:05 AM
7

These false accusations are happening so often.... anyway again, any woman that does this should be incarcerated on the spot, on the grounds of extreme calumny. There is already an appropriate channel by which the citizenry report crimes committed, it's called going to the police. Attempting to circumvent the justice system in order to commit harm to another, is a crime, or at least it should be. All people involved in the witch hunt should suffer consequences, it is disturbing that they have no…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:03 AM
0

this story wins the internet for today. ... seriously? A bunch of hyper entitled brats throwing a tantrum "wins the internet for today"? your standards are broken.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:59 AM
1

Here my problem with this, he is a cosmetology student so why shouldn't he be allowed? Because it's against the rules. There really should be no policy on make up IMO. Doesn't matter what your opinion on the rules is, the rules are in place. These students can lobby to get the rules changed and that's totally reasonable.... but just straight up violating the rules because you feel like it? justifiable suspension. You worked for a security company and don't know this? O_o It's like the security c…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:44 AM
2

Wait, let me see if I have this correctly; Hey student, take the make up off , it is against school policy . fek u. . Alright... [suspends student] This was not an injustice, nor was it unfair. It doesn't matter if he "studies cosmetology" , if the school has a ruleset for presentation and he was in violation of it, it is not unreasonable for him to be suspended. This should be self-evident but apparently in modernity, logic and reason are a scarcity. Also, it's not like he was blindsided. He wa…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:03 AM
-2

And I studied linguistics for three years You wasted three years of your life. You seem to have an atrocious understanding of the topic. you clearly are the intellectual giant Your insecurity means nothing to me. gg'd kid.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:52 AM
-1

Buddy thinks he so high and mighty That's funny. Also, ad hominem detected. A clear sign of desperation and idiocy, gg.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:47 AM
-1

You’re honestly fucked in the head if you think it’s okay to just suck off little boys you’re fucked up That's a great strawman argument. Let me know if you find who it belongs to. Pfeh, go waste someone else's time, little socialist.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:45 AM
-2

Language is flexible /facepalm ​ First, that would depend on what language we're talking about. Second, language is not "flexible" in the way you are describing. It is quite literally, the opposite of what your argument is trying to convey. ​ I already know you are ..... special, so this is pointless but , language is very specifically a series of words and agglomeration of words that facilitate conveying ideas between one human and another. If language were "flexible" in the way you are using i…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:40 AM
-1

I’m not sure how to quote things on reddit Mmmhmm. Yeah you keep pretending , you might convince someone that your bullshit strawman argument was not a bullshit strawman argument. ​ Now, the statement you tried to quote is not what you attempted to ascribe to me. They do not line up, at all, doubly so because you took that statement out of context. ​ The fact that it starts with "However" should be a dead-giveaway that it is taken out of context to anyone even remotely competent. You socialists …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:26 AM
-14

If I murder your daughter in front of you, yes, I'm not technically able to make you feel bad about it, but it'd certainly be acceptable usage to say that the horrendous crime made you feel awful. .... are you serious? Not only are you completely wrong, that is a childish understanding of emotions. It speaks incredibly poorly of you to make such an asinine argument. If I had a daughter, which I don't, and you murdered her in front of me, no, I would not "feel bad about it", I would subdue you, c…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:22 AM
-2

You said it’s not as big of a deal because it was a crime against a boy. Quote where I said "It's not as big of a deal because it was a crime against a boy" . C'mon, show me where I said that. Oh that's right, I never said such a thing; Strawman argument noted and dismissed. While a simple minded individual (I.e. socialists) could possibly think that that is the takeaway, that is a simplistic, and incorrect understanding of a more complex concept. Yet again, it's called CONTEXT . I'm gettnig tir…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:15 AM
-5

You accused someone of a strawman but all you do is strawman. The difference between a fool and someone making logical arguments is that if you are going to accuse someone of a logical fallacy, you indicate exactly where such a thing occurred. A fool will just name-drop a fallacy thinking that's an argument, it isn't. It is a desperate appeal to authority, epic fail.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:12 AM
-1

Psychiatry is different from Psychology That's nice. What's your point? ​ >Psychiatry **focuses entirely on mental illness and supplying medication** for it ​ Uhh, you sure about that? I can tell you , you are completely wrong but it is unlikely that you will be able to understand. ​ >Psychology is the study of the human brain ​ Nope. ​ The study of the "human brain" would fall within the purview of neurology, not psychology. Just stop. ​ >Psychiatry, Sociology, Anthropology, etc. are all branch…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:10 AM
-7

You’re arguing ​ Stop you right there, little leftist, my argument is that context matters. Your argument is to act like a brain-addled simp, disregarding reality in favor of your nonsense. ​ What the woman did was absolutely a crime, and she got too much leniency, but to pretend what she did was the same as an actual rape, I.e. sexual intercourse proper, is to be wrong and delusional.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:05 AM
-12

I don’t believe men and women are the same. Then your argument is refuted in its totality. Men and women are not the same and to pretend otherwise is pure unadulterated insanity. you really think that it’s a less of a problem to rape a man than a woman I don't remember ever making that argument.... nice strawman though. My argument was very clear, this woman got too much leniency , but not unreasonably so. I would rather see men get this level of leniency than brutalize women the way men are....…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 05:02 AM
-24

Answer the question; ​ Do you believe men and women are the same? ​ If you are going to pretend like I have not prompted you directly once again, you are dismissed and a complete waste of time.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:58 AM
-6

I see you posting these disgusting comments Yawn. ​ If they are wrong in any way, make the counter argument, little one. You are a waste of time.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:57 AM
-9

Oral sex on a child is still fucking despicable What's your point? who is arguing otherwise? ​ Oh that's right, no one. You fail.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:56 AM
-31

I don’t get why a women having sexual intercourse with a boy is any different that the same situation with the roles reversed. Serious question, do you truly believe men and women are the same? ​ If yes, you are wrong and/or mentally ill. If no, your argument is refuted.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:55 AM
-7

Stop trying to normalize pedophilia. "This is absolutely a crime" ​ "Stop trying to normalize pedophilia" ​ Put the booze down and sleep it off man, you are way out of it.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:54 AM
9

Agreed. The judge(s?) should be stripped of their authority for permitting such an abortion of justice to play out in their courtroom. This isn't even an opinion.... she got off with a proverbial slap on the wrist .
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:51 AM
1

and you become pregnant due to an accident Wtf is this? Maybe you can fool a child with that argument, but any adult here knows that there are no "accidental pregnancies", not in modernity and this is not "abstinence" I'm talking about so don't bother trying that bullshit strawman argument. Taking the pill, an IUD, a shot, a patch... these have an extremely high rate of success , and doubling up on methods yields, for all intents and purposes, virtual impossibility of pregnancy. I have never eve…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:49 AM
-11

I'd say it'd be a truly impressive individual doesn't "feel bad" when the entire community is treating him like a sexual deviant. Subjective argument is subjective. This isn't debatable. You cannot make someone "feel" something, period.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:45 AM
-49

How old is this "teacher".....? she looks like she's 16 but maybe I'm just getting old. Anyway, I guess this is where I have to take a few downvotes because I once again have to be the voice of reason surrounded by a bunch of socialist clowns... The woman in this instance performed oral sex on the teenager, a 14 year old. This is absolutely a crime, however the implication that this is on the level of , say, a male teacher having sexual intercourse with a 14 year old girl, is absolute nonsense. …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:41 AM
11

2% of rape accusations are false Does anyone actually believe that? Eugene Kanin established a baseline of 41% quite some time ago and he posited that the actual number was much greater due to the insane leeway women get to just back out of a completely bullshit allegation.... the woman has to seriously fuck up in order for it to be classified as a false rape accusation... and Kanin STILL had a 41% result. it was measured while Obama was in office and the US Justice system at the time wasn't all…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:36 AM
-10

this guy was made to feel No. You cannot make people "feel" something. Emotion is an abstract concept but one of the few defined features of it is that it is purely internal. No one can "make" you have an emotion. That being said, the person in question was indeed acosted. Anyway.... The fact that an adult would consent to 'marry' one of his students It's a joke "wedding" meant to be for amusement and to facilitate interaction between faculty and students. Whoever wrote that article is a moron. …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:29 AM
0

Using relativism Nope. You can keep trying to use strawman arguments, you will fail every time. The argument was an objectivist one, not a relativistic one.... obviously. Just call it subjective then you don't have to deal with it. Actually a subjective argument by definition has no value. It has nothing to do with what I call it, and everything to do with what it is.... again, obviously. You either care about society bei.... Stop you right there , kid.... "society" is an abstract notion and can…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:14 AM
1

Well that's a pretty extreme shift, that's fine. You don't appear to have anything of substance to say, gg.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:07 AM
2

A lot of barely suppressed rage. That's funny. Also pretty clear projection.... the only thing that legitimately causes me to become infuriated is something like , say... multiple infancide going completely unpunished. Something like that would infuriate me, yes. Some talk of basic chivalry though? hmmm.... unless I got this very wrong and you are talking about the women I mentioned, that would adhere to an absurd level of protocl (VERY unlikely), you are projecting, and it speaks very poorly of…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:08 AM
1

How about the moral fiber and decency of society? Subjective argument is subjective. Try again, this time with some actual logic and reason. Using "art" as an excuse "excuse"? waste of time, not bothering to read anything else.... I dislike the argument too, but giving "art" greater leeway than anything else, or, maximum leeway, is not only correct, but necessary. Again, I am very against what this person did, but it is indisputably a work of art... terrible art, but art nonetheless. The Decamer…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:04 AM
7

It is official: men are an oppressed minority these days. Strawman argument detected. Also, when the author immediately, and I mean within the opening line, IMMEDIATELY, falls back on the bullshit marxist dichotomy of "victim/oppressor", you know you're in for a terrible article. as the ghastly Men’s Rights movement puts it with the full cod-philosophical force of the Matrix movies, swallowed ‘the red pill’. /facepalm Sometimes I wonder if leftists are just being disingenous or if they are truly…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:07 AM
6

I am shocked that first-world nations have not implemented any measures against the witch hunt. Any woman making such claims should be imprisoned on the spot on the grounds of calumny. There is already a method by which such criminal actions are reported, it's called going to the police. Attempting to circumvent jurisprudence to damage someone.... that's a crime, or that should be a crime. I see no reason for this not leading to imprisoned witch hunters.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:36 AM
1

I'm extremely confused, "delaying cancer diagnosis"? that's not how semiology works. NHS Oh, well that explains it. The fact that the U.K. has cancer diagnosis and possibly even treatments available in the NHS is insane. No shit the quality of treatment is going to be wretched... Semiology is the study of signs and symptoms with the purpose of forming a proper final diagnosis. This doesn't "delay", if the information is available, it must be shared and acted upon immediately. Failure to do so is…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:43 AM
0

I'd like to point out that the reasons for men dying sooner are still unclear. However, the leading hypothesis' at the moment are along the lines of; Men are more prone to disregard their health, more prone to consume higher amounts of alcohol/tabacco/drugs/etc. and of course, work longer hours/more days than women. The leading hypothesis strongly indicates that this "gap" is entirely self-created... and that's fine. Clint Eastwood summarizes nicely
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:39 AM
0

I think the American Psychiatric Association is a little different from PsychologyToday. Given the extreme loss of prestige after the DSM V scandal, I only barely acknowledge a difference between those concepts. I am not a psychiatrist, I am but a mere dentist, however for as low as my prestige is in the medical community, at least I am not a charlatan. Psychology is a joke now.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:36 AM
5

If you’re talking about sex I'm not, I was talking about behavioral protocol. But sure, let's make it about sex.... there have always been discrete sexual encounters, there has always been "cheating" and promiscuity, that's not really in debate (Ex: The decameron is a pretty clear, hard example of hardcore debauchery dating back to at least around the black plague era, given that I assume large parts of the story were taken from RL experience). No. The difference is not the existence of it, but …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:33 AM
0

Alright, let's extend maximum benefit of the doubt here because this is an incredibly delicate issue. "Art" has always flirted with the taboo and the lines that should not be crossed. I have found a lot of art to be "tasteless" but taste is subjective. I consider this art to be in incredibly poor taste but , I would still defend it. I despise the argument, but it is a valid one.... "art" needs to be opposed only in the most extreme examples where it is necessary to do so due to exigent circumsta…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:44 PM
10

No. Sperm counts have fallenb y over 50%.... And already I have completely lost interest in anything they have to say. That is a complete bullshit statistic.That's not how sperm counts work, and I would wager to say they're talking about AVERAGE sperm count of all men. This means that because we have more old people than ever, the value has been necessarily skewed. But that should never be an issue because anyone that isn't a retard would control for such a variable. Epic fail.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:21 PM
5

It's important to note that VERY stupid people think that anything that goes over their head is "patronizing". Thus , I contend that any woman that uses the nonsensical non-word "mansplaning" is signaling that she is suffering from extreme mental retardation.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:19 PM
0

Psychology today Lol, nice job destroying what little prestige your field had left after the DSM V debacle. Is this legit? I am having a lot of trouble believing even the borderline charlatans (psychologists and their ilk) would make such idiotic arguments.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:17 PM
8

Afghan police officers sexually abusing boys they had brought to the base. “At night we can hear them screaming..." Is this legit? that is unforgivable levels of negligeance ... what the fuck
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:16 PM
6

That's not exactly true. Chivalry was alive and well in the 19th century. Not exactly the same, but my grandmother used to tell me about how when she was a child, HER grandmother and great grandmother, would constantly tell her 'how' to be a lady and what the protocol entailed. It seemed, in my opinion, very psychotic, the level of protocol was extreme and it was all-encompasing, but I STRONGLY suspect that most of that was meant for other women, not for men...... anyway the point was, women beh…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:15 PM
11

Karla Homolka should never have been released. Life sentence without possibility of parole, anything less is an atrocity.... and if it wasn't Canada, I'd even be arguing the death penalty. The Bernardo/Homolka case was extremely heinous and should have garnered zero sympathy from anyone involved in the judicial process. Epic fail.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:14 PM
3

Is the story here that a person who was an accomplice to murder served less jail time than a person who actually committed murder? I don't get the pseudo-outrage. With the exception of the last statement, the above quoted is pretty solid. Yes, being an accomplice or accessory comes with a lower sentence. I believe she was given too much leniency in this case but it's not an unreasonable case. EDIT : Holy shit, this is the Homolka case? wow, nevermind. That bitch deserves the worst. I didn't chec…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:11 PM
3

Feminists and SJWs are the bottom of the barrel, yes. Not really a statement that will have much disagreement here.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:08 PM
1

This doesn't mean power/money/being cool... Damn, I've been doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:06 PM
2

I'm a teenager (a boy obviously) TEENAGER. SHUN THE NON-BELIEVER. SHUUUN. No but seriously, at this stage in your life there are two choices, just take it easy, focus on yourself and be aware of how the deck is stacked against you in nearly all situations. The other is to make content like articles, videos or even just comments reflecting your position , which I assume is in favor of men having rights. I strongly recommend you take the former rather than the latter. This isn't a sprint, it's an …
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:05 PM
1

Marxist propaganda has no place in universities, unless it is a study of it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:02 PM
2

Bureau of Gender Affairs That's all I need to know about them. Nothing they could possibly say will ever have merit.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:59 PM
2

Or, and get ready for this, people want good stories and characters, not propaganda. I would argue that this is why anime is rising in popularity (more so).... because Japan does not give a fuck. They stick to good stories and characters, Overlord is a pretty good example of something using an incredibly tired formula but succeeding on the strength of its characters and story. [I.e. Isekai anime is ultra overplayed. OP protagonist is ultra overplayed. Overlord managed to do both with great succe…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:59 PM
2

An Indiana University study finds that efforts to raise awareness of the lack of women in STEM are actually making women feel more out of place. ... they needed a study for this?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:57 PM
6

More men are staying single. Some do it by choice. Some just do it because they’ve given up and decided to take themselves out of the dating pool. Whatever their reason, the results are the same. Yeah...? I have recently gone full MGTOW and one of the things that very quickly changed is that there is a constant barrage from people around me telling me "DID YOU FIND A GIRL YET? YOU JUST AREN'T TRYING. CHANGE YOUR TACTICS. LOWER YOUR STANDARDS" , and so on and so forth. My argument is pretty strai…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:55 PM
9

A woman may go to prison for a murder her boyfriend committed ... that is the most bullshit headline I've read in a very long time. Without delving into the specific details, that is just straight up wrong. For ex : Even if someone else commits a murder, there is such a thing as being an accomplice or an accessory to murder. "I didn't pull the trigger" is not a defense. “Women can be just as violent as men” is the common call of the Men’s Rights Activist. Direct violence? yes ,that is correct. P…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:45 PM
-1

Russian propaganda 0/10. At least troll in non-obvious ways.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:49 AM
-11

I’m not the first person you responded to Doesn't matter. All arguments must stand on their own merit. I’m not left. Your arguments indicate otherwise. you read my last sentence you can see that I said the words “significant reason.” Deliberate ambiguiety is not an argument , nor is it an effective shield. That's what we call obfuscation. Doesn't help your case. I believe our medicine field is advanced enough that we can detect stuff like you listed before it becomes a problem u wot m8? This isn…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:09 AM
1

Children are not property. Strawman argument. Try addressing the actual points next time.... given that you are just a propagandist, I know you will not because you cannot.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:00 AM
-1

random insults Confirmed, you have nothing of value to say. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:59 AM
-1

Yawn, you have no argument to present then, little socialist?
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:54 AM
1

The totalitarian agenda of “a persons body belongs to them.” Yawn. A socialist's drivel has no value. You can pretend that stripping parents of their rights and subjugating the citizenry as vassals of the state is not an aspect of totalitarianism, but you'd be incredibly wrong.... pfeh, socialists.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:44 AM
-24

But there’s no reason to make that decision. That's demonstrably false; They're called infection and necrosis. These are both objective and indisputable reasons to perform a circumcision. I already know you weren't referring to that, but given that your default was to make factually incorrect, propagandist statements, it was necessary to refute your bullshit. 99.99999% of the time no male infant will die if he doesn’t get circumcised Bullshit statistic is bullshit. Not to mention the overall arg…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:42 AM
-10

Are you fine with FGM Red herring. Stay on topic, little socialist. I know in the mind of you and others like you, government is god and can do no wrong. Reality however, does not bend to your delusions.... there is no justification for the brutal subjugation of the citizenry and no, your bullshit "utopia" is irrelevant here.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:25 AM
-4

Yeah it's not rape Fact. neither is it perfectly right either Opinion. One that I share, but opinion nonetheless.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:25 AM
0

It’s leftist propaganda to strip citizens of their rights to forward a leftist totalitarian agenda. Fixed. You can try to strawman but I will correct you and your bullshit arguments.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:23 AM
1

Circumcision isn’t rape. The fact that this is getting downvoted goes to show how it is very common propagandists frequent this subreddit. Yes, circumcision is not rape. To suggest otherwise is pure unadulterated retardation and/or socialist nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 11:51 PM
-28

The boy was a few days old at the time, incapable of consenting. That's not how that works, the infant is a ward and his parents are the guardians/tutors that make decisions in his place. They fucked up bad and so did the person that performed this. Attempting to use this to pitch your leftist propaganda is incredibly fucked up and you should not do that in the future.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 11:51 PM
-6

This is really fucking infuriating, the person that performed the procedure and the parents that took him to such a person have committed a series of unacceptable acts. I STRONGLY disagree with circumcision but unlike the leftists that peruse this subreddit, I do not agree that government subjugation of the parents (I.e. an aspect of totalitarianism) is the solution. That being said, if a parent, absolutely positively believes that circumcision is something that should be done, it is 100% their …
/r/MensRights13/09/18 11:49 PM
-1

If you mean a person who goes outside and realizes how much of this social media bs is absolute cope, yup Nope. You can pretend that that's what we're talking about, I am uninterested in what your leftist propaganda is. Like man stop labeling So essentially, you are indeed a hardcore marxist and are everything I said but you dislike that I recognized your bullshit rhetoric because that undermines your purpose. Gotcha. This is much more of a real threat than whatever child support bs or sex haras…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 06:08 PM
1

Philosophically the two have similar goals, reclaiming public space for single men. "reclaiming public space for single men"? I have no idea what you're talking about. Neither the MRM nor MGTOW have that ideological purpose. if you genuinely avoid women and keep to yourself, you’re not going to encounter many rights violations Yep. And that is the purpose of MGTOW. these are the guys encountering misandry and matriarchal oppression society’s claims and it’s current prejudice against men. You app…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:03 PM
1

I don't even know what obvfuscation means u wot m8? I appear to have given you way too much credit .... this is what happens when someone insists on giving others the benefit of the doubt, gg.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:01 PM
1

I said my friends are well adjusted, not me. Which is quite an amusing example of a srawman ironically. Obfuscation is not the other side's strawman argument. Your statement was about yourself entirely, but then you use sleight of hand to switch it up. In other words it is poorly presented and I suspect , deliberately so give the "as much as I do" line at the end as well. I wish you good fortune in the wars to come. That's funny. About what is expected from a strawmanning cuck.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:52 PM
1

No srawman. Actually it is a strawman. I'm referring to the "women are only good for one thing" mentality of mgtow That's not at all part of MGTOW philosophy. You're talking nonsense at best. And yes, you're so "well adjusted" you have to resort to using back-to-back strawman arguments, heh.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:45 PM
1

Ah okay so you were spewing bullshit from the beginning, gotcha. Worth noting that your strawman argument is not part of MGTOW philosophy.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:57 PM
1

I accept your path in life has been different from mine, but I can't accept that ALL women are feminist idiots Could you show me where I said that anywhere in this thread or anywhere period? Thanks.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:52 PM
1

She lives like a queen, but she wants more. This is exactly why I have gone full fledged MGTOW now. I had resisted for years, but I can no longer pretend like I am not watching how fucked up the RvR of the situation has become. Only a fool engages in a life-destroying, no-win deal. But what would you guys do ? Luckily in my nation women can't do what you're suggesting, but if I were you, depending on how much money we're talking about, I'd bolt to another nation.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:43 AM
1

The marxism is dripping out of her every orifice. Sometimes I wonder why women have such a great affinity for marxism and its bullshit "victim/oppressor" dichotomy, but that curiosity is quelled as soon as I remember that the whole purpose is to absolve women of responsibility altogether for their criminal or even just unethical behavior. "Asia Argento" is a prime example.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:42 AM
2

I strongly agree with this. As a parent, it should be my right to stab one of my child's eyes out with a rusty butter knife. I don't agree with it, but giving the Government the power to stop me is far, far worse because it makes the Government my child's parents instead of me, and that's feudalism, you ignorant totalitarian tabula rasa commie lizard person! That's funny. I do enjoy watching commies make non-arguments again and again. Carry on, little one.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:40 AM
0

Commie. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:44 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:41 PM
-1

Parents do not and never had the right to perform surgeries on their children I'm sure of your communist government said it was to be done, you would be on board with that. But facetiousness aside for a moment, parents do not "perform surgery on their children", that is pure nonsense even beyond what a communist normally spews.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:38 AM
0

Thus I think that the 3 aggravated ones are with boys under 16. Ah shifting the goalposts is your response. You said "People under 15", now it's under 16. Care to get your story straight? no, I know you don't. You're just looking to whine. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:37 AM
1

You say "stripping parents of rights" as though you believe that they had any right to begin with. I'm sure in the mind of a commie, no one has any rights. The state is absolute and never wrong. It must decide everything for everyone, right?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:36 AM
1

since the argument for allowing parents to medically circumcise is based on the assumption that "parents have the child's best interests in mind" That is half the argument, which would make it a strawman argument. The core premise is; Subjugating the citizenry as vassals of the state, by virtue of stripping them of their rights is socialism. Socialism, I.e. maoist china, socialist russia, north korea, castro's cuba , chavez's venezuela and other examples, are absolute putrid cesspits of grand-sc…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:05 AM
1

"Under her care" is the thing what makes it mostly illegal. That's a pretty broad statement. In any case, that's grounds for being unethical, not illegal. The aggrevated ones are the ones with people under 15 I guess Where pray tell does it say the woman had sex with "people under 15"? Show me.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:02 AM
-1

These are my justifications. THAT was your attempt to justify totalitarianism? Sure let me answer your question with your level of argument Are you an anarchist? Potato. That is the level of argument you're presenting. Nothing you said even remotely comes close to justifying the brutal subjugation of the citizenry. since Totalitarianism is not my issue. Ahahahaha, I'm sure the utopia is just one more massacre away, right? But alright, I have had my fun, you deliberately wasted my time from the b…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 09:00 AM
-1

Congratulations then, because it will reside only in your head how you outmatched anything, by addressing nothing and convincing nobody. Don't care about what your opinion of reality is, I care about reality. The reality is, you have nothing of substance to justify your commie nonsense. "Strawman to the death" is your mantra Projection by a commie, how novel. /s Since you end your comment with a red herring that is pretending to be substantive, answer me this, little commie; What justifies your …
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:27 AM
-1

What is "Lysenkoism" for 750 Alex. Yawn. You have nothing, and still outmatched for a factor of several millions, little commie.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:57 AM
1

That's actually a very good point. And although I suspect you are completely correct that those are huge factors, I would argue that it is a combination of both, but of course with the bulk of it being your point rather than mine.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:50 AM
-1

What is "The Great Leap Forward" for 500 Alex. You can keep pretending these things didn't happen, little commie, but reality will not bend to your emotion.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:46 AM
3

So make Osaka Wait what? glorious Nippon is involved?! Naomi Osaka ?! If the lovely Yamato Nadeshiko (Not really a nadeshiko but still) is robbed, it will severely undermine (well more so) the credibility of female sports.... knowing that a Japanese woman won, I might actually have to watch these matches.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:42 AM
-2

Being out the venomous snakes. The Snake Handlers of Kentucky will be happy to hear that you support their right to put babies and children in pens with vipers. "Faith, Prophecy and Obedience" (https://www.christianpost.com/news/snake-handling-christians-faith-prophecy-and-obedience-75985/) But the government is the real enemy.... /s Yawn. What are gulags, famines, purges and massacres for 500 Alex. Need me to link to what these are? I certainly hope not. But yes, you lose by a factor of several…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:38 AM
1

over the prolonged sexual abuse of boys as young as 15 Wait, so it was "boys" aged 15-17, and she was aged 18-21? maximum potential variance then is 15 and 21 with the most probable maximum range actually being 16 and 20 ? yeah unethical.... wouldn't even classify as a crime in my nation, and rightly so. Rather than want women to be punished as severely as men in this instance, the pursuit should be to have men receive the same leniency we are seeing here.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:36 AM
6

Not with the massive backlog of convicted women for the last few years. I've noticed that as well. That women have begun to drastically increase this behavior whereas men have decreased it more and more.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 07:31 AM
1

TIL Ernest Belfort Bax was a time traveller from the 60s. Non sequitur is non sequitur. https://ernestbelfortbax.com/tag/the-fraud-of-feminism/ I normally ignore blind links but you have me curious, let's see what you have presented. FEMINISM, or, as it is sometimes called, the emancipation of woman, as we know it in the present day, may be justifiably indicted as a gigantic fraud LOL? WAIT WHAT? So you're not actually presenting evidence of a woman declaring and defining the movement as "femini…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:14 AM
-3

I have no interest in what some commie's non argument is. There is no justification for your nonsensical 100% fail-rate totalitarian government. Government is NOT the best parent, parents should never be subjugated as vassals of the state for the purpose of your so-called "utopia".
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:11 AM
1

I know "women" doing this is the flavor of the week Uhhhh.... surely you jest, sir... The Eugene Kanin study was performed in 1994, and even back then they knew that false rape accusations were incredibly common. That was the impetus for the study in the first place. Kanin's results were that at the very least a baseline of 41% of accusations are false, with the real number likely being significantly higher due to the terms of what defines a "false rape accuastion" being incredibly stringent rat…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:42 AM
1

Доверяй, но проверяй Trust but verify?! /moan KIA in my Men's rights <3
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:41 AM
1

Serious question, what's the difference between third and fourth wave feminism? There are no "waves", feminism is one continuous pile of garbage that does not appear to end. Don't buy into their propaganda.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:40 AM
1

"Fourth wave feminism" Fuck off, there is only one feminism and it has always been garbage. It started in the 1960s and 1970s and has never stopped with the exactly same bullshit rhetoric. The age of consent in California is 18. In most other states, it's 17, which means Argento committed a crime in only a very technical sense. While I think it was wrong to take advantage of a young man who claimed he saw her as a mother figure to him—and it was certainly wrong to ply him with alcohol, as Argent…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:39 AM
1

shot him dead in the presence of their three children Cold-blooded murder? in front of their three children? that is a severe aggravant , and if it isn't, it should be. Life sentence without possibility of parole. The comment section there. Someone is bound to point out how there are many jokes being told which would never be told if the situation were reversed. Let me pre-emptively say, we already know that women are severely over-valued in modernity and men are severely under-valued, the comme…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:33 AM
-6

Disagree with the arguments. Strongly agree with the outcome. It is a continual source of shock that people here can advocate for socialism/communism in the form of a totalitarian government that subjugates parents as vassals of the state.... I don't agree with circumcision and in fact, am very much against it, however I do not believe the way to correct something wrong is to do something worse. People on this subreddit see how the state brutalizes men through divorce rape and the pussy pass in …
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:29 AM
-1

Wow, strong words there, bud. Talk about overreacting. You must have zero self-awareness. But it is not surprising given you are one of them. “Cringe” and “douchey” are standard words informal English. Not interested in your nonsense. You use the lowest type of nomenclature yet heavily criticize me for using one stylized phrase. At best you're a high-end hypocrite, at worst you are absolute putrid scoriae and nothing more.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:24 AM
1

it’s cringy and it makes you sound elitist and douchey. that word is fedora-wearing-m’lady-nice-guy levels of cringy. SJW/feminist terimnology is what is "cringy" and makes you sound "douchey". I may have listened to you if you weren't blatantly using twitter jargon which is the height of garbo being that twitter is an SJW/feminist hive. One could even say it indicates that you are true putrid scoriae of the lowest order.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:42 AM
1

In the post i just replied to i pointed it out. You asked for an event that a man can drag a woman away from, i told you ... do you even know what the word "contradiction" means? Good lord. anecdotal /rolleyes Anecdotal evidence is meaningless, doubly so if your anecdote is full of holes. it means you should reexamine said hypothesis. Re-examine The Null Hypothesis...? do... you even know what these words mean? holy shit. There will always be differences and nuance. Meaningless. I demonstrated t…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 01:36 AM
2

I personally do not believe that women face any sexism in sports. Actually it has been shown that women get a huge amount of perks , benefits and amenities. That is "sexism", specifically it is misandry. Does anyone have a good argument supporting the feminist idea that female athletes are discriminated against? Are you seriously asking if there is any logical backing or argument to justify a feminist position ? You have much to learn, padawan.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:31 AM
5

Sweden = cuckistan. They had an election and it appears that the hard-cuck party is nearly beating the nationalist "let's protect our people from the muslims" right wing party concerned with taking logical and reasonable measures to protect their nation. It is unclear, but we'll see what happens. If the Swedish people once again vote in the HARD-cucks as their leaders, I will have zero sympathy when get reports of them getting uh, let's say "displaced" [aka killed] , in their own homeland. You c…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:24 AM
2

You could argue there are two types of doxxing. Bullshit. This is exactly why the internet has had to get hyper-specific about what constitutes doxxing. Doxxing is whenever someone reveals information of yourself that you have not revealed and do not want revealed. If you upload your personal information to or through a public filter by which your information is linked and available, anyone linking to that information is NOT DOXXING, precisely because you yourself put it up there. For example if…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:22 AM
2

This isn't a new SJW/femininst position. I used to somewhat be a fan of Vadim Newquist in the very early days of his "Creationist Cat" schtick. Basically when he made fun of The Vigilant Christian and Mr. TJ. Anyway after that he went on DP where he PERSONALLY used his real name on the skype chat they were in, and then not too far after (a month ish?) Atheism-is-unstoppable used Vadim's real name in a twitter exchange they had. Vadim called it "doxxing" and absolutely insisted that it was doxxin…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:19 AM
-2

I have explained this, at length, several times. Your question is nonsensical to the extreme. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:13 AM
1

Me: Dropping blind links is not an argument. . Fool: It's not a blind video. . Me: Yeah because that's what I said /s . Fool: It's literally what you said. 0/10. Dismissed, kid.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:09 AM
1

Barely is the operative word here, she could not get out of the car, nor move, for hours. So let me get this straight, she couldn't "get out of the car" , nor move for hours, but she was driving home, operating a vehicle , without issue literally moments before? Good lord, that's some precise, nanomachines son, level technology on these magic pills... You're contradicting yourself. LOL? let's see it, where did I "contradict myself". My "claim"? I never made a claim, kid. Yawn. Stating that a myt…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:08 AM
-3

They still held the segregated events didn't they? Doesn't matter, they backed down. SJW/feminist morons would have doubled down. They didn't back down Firing employees that were arguing against the people criticizing the retarded conference is a gesture of very good faith. Also worth noting that it has been reported by more than a few people, that when men showed up to the so-called "segregated event" as you say, they were allowed in without issue.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:05 AM
-2

Good word, but doesn’t exist in the context of “garbage” in English AFAIK. You are correct and I am well aware of that. It is a strange idiosyncracy that I find gives the phraseology some character. Here is what I am talking about. Translate escoria to english noun slag scum I tend to use "scoriae" as an imprecise translation of "escoria" which means trash, garbage, impure, dirty, etc.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 12:02 AM
0

The girl swallows the ‘bomb’ Already that's retarded.... but we'll get to that shortly.... and the liquid it’s dissolving into And she doesn't taste the obviously contaminated liquid? she doesn't see the obvious presence of an adulterant? is the woman mentally handicapped? retarded? blind? no sense of taste or texture ? ???? then it’s absorbed into her bloodstream That's not how that works; Drugs aren't "absorbed into your bloodstream" unless you are IVing to bypass first metabolism....... there…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:56 PM
-2

the quote was from ArenaNet in reference to a different incident, not from Riot about this one. Yeah the Jessica Price acts like a twat incident, I know. But Riot was constantly being told by the players, including myself "Did you learn nothing from Arena.net?" which they clearly did. Keep in mind Riot sanctioned the segregated event And when it blew up in their face they backed down, as they should... an SJW/feminist company would have instead DOUBLED DOWN on their retardation. Riot didn't. Hen…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:47 PM
8

You are not trying to educate entitled women. Absolutely. You are 100% correct. You are warning everyone that this is what you can expect from women. Kind of.... generally the point is to show to third party observes that putrid scoriae does not have the capacity for rational thought.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:40 PM
9

2? I thought it was just the one. I am very impressed and I was completely ready to quit League over this. Well played Riot, you have justified my love for your game and company. Jesse Perring dragon kick'd those cucklords out of there, as it should be. “Their attacks on the community were unacceptable,” Exactly, holy shit, Riot, stop, my penis can only get so erect.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:01 PM
-1

there is documented evidence of it.....How can you even start to justify saying something with so much proof is just a myth? "There's just so much evidence." "Ok. Show me." "BWUUAAAHH , U R STEP SIDEONsDNIEWYHFUU WTF ZMOG. U FIRST HSOW EICADENVcE." 0/10. It was obvious you had nothing of substance to say, but I wanted to catch you out on your bullshit like all other propagandist. Mythology is mythology, nothing more. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:59 PM
-2

yeah "yeah", good refutation, oh wait. its not generally accepted as a myth. Who gives a fuck what is "generally accepted". That's subjectivist nonsense. A myth is the lochness monster. Which has about as much evidence supporting it as the magical "date rape drug" myth. there is documented evidence of it.....How can you even start to justify saying something with so much proof is just a myth? Hoo? care to provide this "documented evidence" you speak of? Let's see it, kid.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:36 PM
0

You have no fucking clue what you are talking about Yawn. It is you who has no clue what he's talking about, but you're too stupid to know it. how the fuck do you think most drugs are absorbed? "Absorbed"? you mean route of administration? depends on the type and the user. Usually drug users have a preferred ROA, but what is near-universal, is that drug users will avoid the ROAs with the worst bioavailability, only the most green users will do such a thing. Solubility in water is a great trait f…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:33 PM
9

How fucking lazy are you? A very lazy response, mired in projection, by someone whining about a comment that is very reasonable and logical. Is that you /u/msleeduon?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:06 PM
95

you shouldnt be the reason why people laugh about an idea Oh that's a good line. But remember that SJWs/feminists are so retarded that they are literally immune to parody. That's not a group of people you can use logic and reason against.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:05 PM
9

It is indisputable fact that women are strictly inferior when it comes to any physical competition. Because of this, they generate less money overall because people do not want to watch inferior sportsmen. That being said, yes, they are given strong advantages/benefits in the sense that they are garbage compared to the real tournament level players, but are paid nearly the same or sometimes more, for an inferior performance that generated less money. EDIT: Corrected an error.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:04 PM
-2

no you still do. Nope, it's called The Null Hypothesis. I am shocked that an adult can try to argue otherwise, you are ..... very special. Its not a myth until its proven a myth. "proven a myth"? that is one of the most retarded things I've ever heard. It's called onus probandi and states that the one making a positive claim carries the burden of proof, hence mythology being declared mythology does not require a burden of proof for the person identifying it as such, only for the one claiming it …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:58 PM
-2

A pill well known for lowering inhibitions and making people horny and suggestible? deep sigh Do you know what a neurostimulant is and how it interacts with alcohol ? no, no you don't. Do you know how mdma works ? specifically what happens when you crush it and blend it into a liquid? again no, no you don't. The drug is very water soluble and loses a great deal of potency when mixed into a liquid. That is the the worst route with the lowest bio-availability of all. In other words, you are the dr…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:57 PM
-2

It's not a blind video. Yeah because that's what I said /s Try again.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:52 PM
8

If there is anywhere you aren't going to get raped it's when your surrounded by gay guys in a well lit public place. B-but muh raep culshure !!!!
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:18 PM
1

Cute , but further proves my point gg'd.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:18 PM
2

I'm surprised that someone with your level of interest in rape wouldn't know the answer. Yawn, hey soyboy cuck, deflection only works if you have a base position to deflect back to. Since you don't. You're just showing that you're a desperate mangina that wants to defend mythology without knowing that it is mythology, it's extremely pathetic. I guess her years of medical school and working in hospitals are rendered invalid then. More like your story is even more obviously bullshit, but you can t…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:16 PM
2

From a few sips of a drink? No. And those sips transmitted a drug into her system at enough of a level where it is meaningful? heh. Mangina simp..... understand reality; You have been lied to and are defending mythology. It's extremely pathetic. Yes, a qualified medical doctor. Oh a "qualified medical doctor" was she? I'm a "qualified medical doctor" too and I knew right off the bat your story was pure bullshit. Medical personnel do not refer to themselves as "doctor" in that context. Where do y…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:58 PM
1

That's real cute, but irrelevant. Myth = myth , until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:52 PM
-2

That's retarded even by SJW/feminist standards. The TERFs are right to oppose the commie fems.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:51 PM
2

Have a source? You do not need a source to "prove" a myth is a myth. Only those making a positive claim of the myth need a source, obviously.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:31 PM
2

or had taken the drugs themselves Correct. That's another one.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:28 PM
2

The so-called date rape drug is alcohol. The overwhelming majority of women who end up in the ER claiming they were drugged end up testing positive for nothing but a BAC over .15. This. Right here. That is reality.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:25 PM
-2

the spiking is usually mdma or some benzodiazepine. .... spiking a drink with mdma? WITH MDMA? A POTENT NEUROSTIMULANT ? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? do you even know what you're talking about? no, no you don't.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:22 PM
1

Citation needed You don't need a citation to state that a myth is a myth. People that forward the myth are the ones that need citations, which of course, they will never provide. Myths are myths for a reason.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:21 PM
2

Spot-on. The people that spread this myth have zero understanding of human physiology.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:18 PM
3

Because they don't work that way. What is written there, is what we call an "unfalsifiable hypothesis" , better known in medical circles as "complete bullshit". Here are the characteristics; unknown drug which is flavorless, odorless and functions when dropped into a liquid (Lol, already we know this is bullshit) "difficult to detect" , so it has a very rapid excretion, already this drug seems magical. Alcohol is a "major risk". "Flunitrazepam" FUCKING CALLED IT. It always comes back to benzodia…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:11 PM
3

The pill must have been slipped into her 12th cocktail, doubter. Lol. And in this case, under the nose of off-duty police! LOL. I MEAN COME ON, do these people think these stories hold up even a little bit?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:03 PM
2

It 100% isn't, so you can pull that bullshit from your file of edgy statements to impress your neckbeard internet friends. Yawn, mangina's nonsense means nothing to me. Present your actual argument , kid. she started to slur and lose consciousness. It's called being drunk. Given that she was a doctor A "doctor" eh? it wasn't hard to get a report which showed that she'd ingested a significant amount of a sedative What kind of sedative? Your soyboy stories do not convince me because they are alway…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:02 PM
-2

If it is a nonexistent drug and a situation that never happens, what is this video of? I don't know, you tell me. Dropping blind links is not an argument. Try again. But it is somewhere in the range of >0 and <100. Nope, it is zero. Try again. Saying every party is a roofie And what drop might that be?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:00 PM
2

No, it was not to save face. In fact when she did manage to get home she was insensate "Insensate"? "managed to get home"? does not compute. She was able to drive home, story does not make sense. However they both did note that a car followed her home Lol, a car followed her home..... you've been watching WAY too many movies. The number of times i've had to drag/carry people to couches, beds, whatever to make sure they weren't just sleeping off a drunken stupor on the floor cannot be counted on …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:59 PM
208

Pretty sure , at least since about 2002 (end of internet 1.0 era ish?) it has been consistently demonstrated that men receive significantly higher levels of "abuse" than women. Not just politicians, just men across the board.... if I recall, it isn't even close. I don't know if the most recent numbers show this, but I vaguely recall since at least 2002 and up to 2013 this has been the case.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:16 AM
5

...this experience did happen to me. No it didn't.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:10 AM
18

What are you, a supermodel? Well I... don't like to brag....
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:09 AM
15

What I wonder is why these undetectable drink-spiking rape-o-pills never seem to get used in any other situation where they could cause trouble. Good point. The usual argument is that these pills are benzodiazepines which couldn't be used in another context since they are "boosted" in potency by alcohol.... what the retards in question don't understand is that benzodiazepines have a very nasty , sour flavor that would be ULTRA obviously detectable in any drink that was spiked with enough of them…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:09 AM
7

Its rare, but it does happen No, it doesn't. If you've heard otherwise you were lied to. at a police party, fortunately she managed to make it home before anything went down. /facepalm So she got drunk and wanted to save face, not surprising. Its not a myth Alright let's play then. Explain to me the mechanics of how this goes down; First, what "drug" is being used? I can tell you right off the bat that the go-to attempt used almost every time is some derivative of benzodiazepines, which doesn't …
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:06 AM
2

I do not agree. I am positive that that person is a troll. There are people that say things I find outrageous but I do not call them trolls. Differences of opinion exist, that person does not have a differing opinion, they are out and out trolling. I assure you, but it's fine if you want to play along with him.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:02 AM
15

at Pride Wtf is "pride"? Light googling says it's some sort of homosexual event, if so, that advice makes zero sense... moreover, a woman getting drunk and slutting it up at a social event isn't rare, a woman getting "drugged" and dragged away is something I have never once in my entire life even heard happening from acquaintances. The "my drink was spiked!" myth that women love to propagate is hilariously nonsensical. It is just a way for them to try to absolve themselves of their own slutty be…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:52 AM
5

u/msleeduon doesn't get it. They're a kid. Experience and observation teaches men of significant age differently. Actually I'm pretty sure he's a troll.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:48 AM
1

MGTOW all the way. More and more I'm starting to think that is the correct path... in general and for me personally.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:19 AM
1

Good. I'm not a MGTOW, but I see the MGTOW numbers rising more and more. Maybe it's better this way.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:10 PM
0

You're mad about something that hasn't happened yet Your projection is noted and dismissed. You have nothing of value to say.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:10 PM
11

Ugly on the outside, ugly on the inside.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:08 PM
0

She has not in anyway received a "PP" as you so vulgarly put it. Vulgarity is properly defined by the crude ideas conveyed, such as your desperate attempt to reframe this. I don't think you've actually read this case. She's being charged. Initially with manslaughter, because that's what the case showed at the time. It's looking likely that this will be upgraded to murder charges with the new information coming forward (not just this, but also there are reports of her using her police status to g…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:59 PM
0

The point is that this is an incredibly high profile case that can really highlight how a woman can easily have the power to abuse a larger stronger man. Again, that detracts from the far more important point of indicating the pussy pass in the justice system being present. You are attempting an SJW/femininst move of filtering information into an only mildly relevant point rather than the core premise forwarded. Women have been getting away with DV Don't be a joke. The justice system's pussy pas…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:51 PM
1

Out of curiosity, what's stopping you from walking away?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:53 PM
-2

domestic violence There is zero point in framing it in those terms, in fact it even detracts from the main point which is the pussy pass identified.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:46 PM
1

Neither are feminist. Obviously.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:27 PM
1

Misandry is hate speech because it is defined as hatred of men. Pornography is legal because everyone involved is consenting, it’s nonaddictive, and there is no reason to criminalize it. Do I even have to be here ? That guy brutally raped her question. Well played anon.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:43 PM
2

Whenever I see this, I just say, “Says the gender that got us kicked out of Eden.” Pwn't. I willl have to start using your line btw.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:41 PM
16

ignored the voices of women What does that even mean? women got to vote in brexit np. This is known, so what's the problem? Are women in the U.K. retarded or something?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:40 PM
-1

Well I know what movie I won't be watching. The guy served his time and has not had instances of falling back into the behavior, what's the problem exactly? stupid SJW/feminists....
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:37 PM
0

Murder can be combined into the act of a sexual assault Nope. You have that backwards. What a waste of time.... if a violent attack/killing of another occurs, that's a murder, period. This is not debatable, dismissed.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:40 AM
0

Actually in extreme cases sexual assault such as the most violent forms of rape can be fetal. Yeah , there's a word for that; Murder. "Sexual assault" is never, ever fatal.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:53 PM
1

Mandi Gray and other women continue to describe herself as a survivor of sexual assault That's real cute and all, but "sexual assault" (whatever that means) is fatal 0% of the time. Stupid cunt.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 06:31 PM
2

Feminism does a fine job of destroying itself. That people adhere to feminist and SJW ideology is a mystery to me,.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:56 PM
1

I believe that the way I acted caused a lack of respect from this girl If you mean this in a sincere manner...... I am impressed. I was afraid and nervous - it was my first relationship ever. Yep, that makes sense. Yet again, this is counter to what you have been told all your life, but women are not "compassionate", they are not kind, nor merciful. A good example of this is divorce court/family court; A woman that had previously said she loves you, will push hard , for the state to brutally rap…
/r/MensRights06/09/18 03:21 AM
1

you claimed something that's untrue Then refute it, you clown. You are wasting my time. I know your type is complete garbage, but I always have hope that you have the potential to learn.... what you will do , if you wish not to be garbage, is to quote exactly which part you believe to be factually incorrect, then formulate a premise that demonstrates it to be wrong. Thus far you're just whining nonsensically..... and I suspect you will continue to do so.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:45 AM
1

Called it. I knew you'd duck the prompt. Do not waste my time with your leftist strawman drivel.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:36 AM
1

Ohh good point.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:37 PM
2

please go back to r/MGTOW That's funny. Let me know if you have an actual argument to present , little SJW.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:35 PM
1

First things first. Spiderman did not say this. Initially the saying was used as a caption in the comic, not actual dialog Sure, we know the origin of the saying in Spiderman was actually Uncle Ben, but he's dead so who gives a fuck. Secondly, the phrase predates Stan Lee and the Spiderman universe. Who gives a fuck. are you really using comic book quotations to strengthen your arguments? Do you leftists just have zero understanding of what a point of principle is? I know that leftists do not ha…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:24 PM
2

That's not a counter-argument, kid.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:23 PM
2

Yes, in fact some. Nope. In fact all feminists are "awful". 100%. No exceptions. If you think otherwise, you are simply wrong. The ideology is inconsistent within itself, and doubly so with objective reality. To say feminism is garbage would be a colossal understatement.... thus anyone that advocates for it can be safely determined to be what they chose to be.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:14 PM
14

Cops should know better. That really pisses me off because it's 100% true, cops SHOULD know better and yet they are some of the biggest mangina white knights of them all.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:53 AM
17

hang on ... EYE DROPS are poisonous? I'm not familiar with the chemical composition of eye-drops but I would assume that they're operate on the same principles as any other form of medication/substance. In high enough amount, anything is toxic to the body, I am going to bet that this guy probably a heart condition which was exacerbated by the extremely rapid consumption of whatever eye drops contain.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:52 AM
43

Women, always playing victim. "He was never violent... but he hurt me." Yes absolutely, but on top of that statement being incredibly nonsensical, the man was not a threat during the first attempted murder, nor at the time of the actual murder. Self-defense only applies if the person you kill was a direct threat to your life which justified urgent and extreme measures. That was not the case here, she should have been thrown in jail for at least 10 years, bare fucking minimum.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:51 AM
1

Why am I not surprised? Probably beacuse even ex-cons need to get a consult... and since I am a medical professional , it's only normal. But that would be a lie, the ex-cons I know I met through my father, an old school communist. Some of the circles he ran, and still occasionally runs with, are very unsavory people...
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:47 AM
3

I’m just confused as to why my country would be marching against the wage gap when people could instead be marching for actual serious issues That's a good point. In fact, if the lie were true, they could eliminate the so-called "wage gap" by working harder/more time rather than wasting time whining about non issues.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:04 AM
12

He apologized because he was under duress. There's no way he randomly changed his mind, I've met tons of medical professionals in both the U.S. and Mexico; The women tend not to "work as hard" as men because the vast majority of women, in my observation, will want to start a family at one point. The few women that don't , can sometimes be fanatically devoted to their work , but these are the extreme minority and if we compare apples to apples, men fanatically devoted to their work, work harder t…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:01 AM
12

I mean , accidents do happen , but she admitted to it.... I guess he didn't press charges? he was not the brightest potato in the nursery....
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:16 AM
1

That's real cute but the only possible argument here is that you believe you are a better judge of the constitution than your judges and legislators combined, or you are wrong. There is no third option. So is your nation completely inept or are you wrong?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:16 AM
11

Re-post... it's still in the front page even, come on man. Anyway, same response; The wife shoots him in the head with a crossbow, the guy takes a bolt to the head and somehow survives. He chooses to stay with the woman, taking zero precuations and she kills him in the next attempt a year or two later. What kind of a moron was that guy? Darwin award winner for sure.... zero sympathy, he should have left, or at least taken precautions.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:25 AM
0

If the 14th amendment were applied for equal protection Let me get this straight, you think the judges and legislators just don't give enough of a fuck to apply the constitution of your nation? Do you actually believe that....? or is it that they differ on the interpretation of that amendment ? I think you know that it is the latter. "Equal protection" does not mean straight up socialism/communism. Men and women are different and thus, the law must be applied on a case-by-case basis as it presen…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:09 AM
1

I call bullshit. Oh? let's see if you have an actual refutation to back that up.... You're basically defending not being a parent at all ... what's your point? women file for the great majority of divorces and women push for keeping the men away. This should result in a complete loss of financial backing for the woman, after all , she exercised her absolute power and should live with the consequences. Did you think that was some kind of argument? it's not even the hints of one. If you didn't wan…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:58 AM
1

Liberty of expression is absolute. If that is what she believes, she has the right to say it without organized/targeted persecution or consequences. That being said, she is a world-class cunt, but I am glad she said this. She is now unmasked and men that are wise to these cons , can look her up a bit before investing anything meaningful into the deceitful snake.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:46 AM
254

Wait, am I reading this correctly? his wife tried to 360 noscope headshot his ass into the grave with a crossbow.... and he chose to stay with that woman? Did the bolt cause brain damage or something? what kind of a moron would stay with a woman that has actively tried to murder him like that?
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:42 AM
-3

Assuming I'm the supposed commie. I don't remember calling you a commie, probably because I never did.... and what you attempted to quote does not indicate anything about you leaving the sub. Your reading comprehension appears to be on the level of a child. If you're going to be a child and produce nothing to the discussion then leave. Oh I see what's happening, I should have realized earlier since your type is so prone to this; You're projecting, a lot. You're clearly so angry More projection, …
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:37 AM
1

Then would you mind explaining the high figures relating to self-harm in prisons? Justify your demand and explain how it relates to anything I said. I know that you can't, but let's see how you weasel out of this prompt.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:31 AM
1

just because I did you don't think I should be on the sub? I don't remember making that statement. Keep your bullshit strawman arguments to yourself, thanks.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:23 AM
1

So you assume no responsibility for a child that you contribute to bring to the world That's none of your business. Every man should have the liberty to decide these things on a case-by-case basis. Brutally enslaving men is never justified. I'm not talking about alimony, just child support. Hey, here's a protip for you, there is very little difference between alimony and child support. A woman will use both for whatever she pleases which makes the distinction purely a semantical one. The child c…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:20 AM
1

Initially, I was on board and thought it was long overdue. You were on board with a mob running a witch hunt and thought it was "long overdue"? it's almost like people don't even know the plot of To Kill a Mockingbird these days. It had paid off with the Harvey Weinstein case. Very incorrect. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence that indicates that he has committed a crime, let alone rape. What I have seen tons of evidence to support, is that he associated with a lot of low value prostit…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:09 AM
1

No. On this tactic , I hold to the belief that "everything can at all times be stated, for it will always be understood by those that are able to understand." [Eliphas Levi]
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:59 PM
1

It was a bit of semantics tbh I checked up on it actually and you are wrong. Children cannot handle money directly in a meaningful way. They can be the proprietor of a future estate, but they cannot , themselves, hold a net worth or property, at best they achieve this through proxy which again, places them as wards under someone else....... basically you were completely wrong. I think father's should help support their kids It doesn't matter what you think. You have no argument. My argument is s…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:46 PM
24

My response to everything in that article is; Idiocy like that is exactly why MGTOW is gaining more followers than ever.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:12 PM
7

Not all feminists are awful people. I disagree. Supporting grand-scale atrocities , even casually, is unaceptable.... but an argument could be made that very stupid people are innately drawn to feminism. True.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:06 PM
0

I think this comes from the ridiculous stereotype No. "Stereotypes" do not create reality, reality create the stereotypes.... and by the way, every stereotype is exactly correct for what it is. Now, though I doubt you are interested in the actual reason for this I will tell you anyway; Male prisons are much more strict because male prisoners are far more dangerous and combative, therefore requiring a stricter hand when dealing with the inmates. Men engage in risk taking behavior more than women,…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:05 PM
7

Some...?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:58 PM
1

no, it's really not Actually , it is. I have no interesst in "purity" nor did I mention anything remotely resembling that. The core premise I forwarded was that the correct response to a wrong being committed is NOT a greater wrong. This is a rock solid principle that forces leftists like you to go into a form of derangement... often in the form of projection. I'm telling you it's dumb to hold yourself to some sort of ideological purity What "ideology" ? You are projecting incredibly hard. look …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:43 PM
2

which defeats the purpose of the movement. "Movement"? you mean the witch hunt? It was always an absolute atrocity. That every single person involved has not been brought to justice, is itself, an injustice. In my nation, those people involved in the witch hunt, are acting outside of the law. This means that they are valid to act against outside of the law as well....... this is a crude method of dealing with the witch hunt, but it has in fact, kept it at bay. I hope all nations will eradicate s…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:38 PM
1

well you have fun patting yourself on the back for your own purity while you lose Projection. Not to mention a complete non-argument, it's a straight up garbage tier ad hominem.... it is very common from your type.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:35 PM
11

All he did was jerk off over the phone.. like hang the fuck up if it bothers you There is a very clear pattern of behavior by these SJWs/feminists, despite having extremely straightforward and effective methods of shutting down these situations, they choose not to , which makes the complicit. Yet they pretend like they're actually somehow "forced" instead of having chosen to stay. In video games the, frankly, very low levels of harassment women receive, can be fixed by putting whoever on ignore/…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:35 PM
2

That was a whole lot of nothing. The witch hunt is horrendous, and has always been horrendous, I.e. since day 1. You speak as someone that appears to have absolutely no idea how the adult world functions. Someone that knows about it perhaps in hypothetical terms, through a thick filter, but not in practical terms. For example: What made Weinstein's tactics unacceptable was the idea that he forced himself on women who were actually unwilling to have sex with him (rape) I have yet to see a single …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:28 PM
1

All thirteen years? Interesting that you went with 13. Given your severe mental disability, I would imagine that that's projection. You are probably 13 or near 13. In any case, you have nothing of value to say. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:16 PM
2

So, you think breasts are the female equivalent of the penis? Could you show me where I made the statement "breasts are the female equivalent of the penis"? Thanks. .... again, your argument is absolute garbage. All you did was amateurishly attempt to shift the goalposts coupled with a poorly formulated strawman argument. I have been debating formally and informally for almost all my life, I can get a pretty good sense of a person's level of intellect from how they debate. You are functionally r…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:08 PM
1

The reason we cover up is cultural, not biological. /facepalm You are seriously threatening to demonstrate a lower level of congitive ability than SJWs/feminists... and that's an incredible feat. There are multiple reasons humans use clothing, but the main one is biological , obviously. It's called "temperature"/"protection from the elements", but also protection from sunlight and a surprisingly high amount of protection from direct contact/friction. In this case specifically, "culture" is irrel…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:02 PM
1

Are your examples sex related as something what happens between 2 humans or something sex realted what women and males have? Because we were talking about organs what matters when having sex. /u/marcooni1 .... do you even know what the word "sex" means? I'll give you a hand since you legitimately appear mentally invalid at this point. 1: either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male especially on the basis of the…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:57 PM
1

Women find muscular men attractive, and muscles don't develop fully until puberty. Should we make bodybuilders cover up, and hide their bodies from the lustful gaze of women? /u/nforne You are the direct voice of ignorance.... or to be precise, you are trying to use subjectivist notions like emotions to create a false definition; We do not define medical concepts by someone's "emotions", that's retarded. More importantly; That's not how reality works and certainly not how medical disciplines wor…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:52 PM
-2

The political compass test puts me in the bottom right. And yet you are advocating for government to strip citizens of their right and subjugate parents as vassals of the state. That is a hard-line commie stance if ever there was one. My questions weren't bullshit gotchas Actually they were, I even explained exactly how..... you have very poor/dishonest character. I asked about hitting... ... because you are incorrectly and very nonsensically attempting to conflate "hitting" with "circumcision" …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:40 PM
1

That seems highly likely given the abysmal performance they show. However, my point was pretty straightforward, we are a sexually dimorphic species, that's not my opinion that is fact. One of the aspects of this dimorphism is female breasts, which easily qualify as organs. Therefore, they are sexual (female) and an organ. There is no counter argument, the people arguing against me have zero understanding of the most basic aspects of human physiology. To call them fools would be an understatement…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:36 PM
1

Not even if she wanted you to? At work? no, not even if she wanted me to, not even briefly. That would be a violation of ethical protocol. I am not exaggerating when I say I am a super duper straight arrow.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:34 PM
-4

I just want to clarify some of your views then. This strikes me as a bullshit gotcha game, but sure, let's play. Do you think someone hitting someone else should be illegal? Irrelevant to the discussion. Should parents have the right to do this to their child when they are 10? 17? When does it cut off? Irrelevant to the discussion. Should parents have the right to mutilate their child in any way they see fit? Somewhat relevant. Firstly, you are incorrect in saying [Should] parents have the right…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:17 PM
1

you cut in talking about organs as lungs and heart. I said that in this thread? where? I specifically used the thyroid and hypofisis as examples, not the lungs or heart... at least not here. So what are you even talking about? put the booze down and sleep it off, you are not making sense.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:10 PM
2

Yes, they are the money management is trusted upon the adult responsible for the child (in this example the mother) but it's still the kid's money I'm not sure if you're playing at a bullshit semantics game or if that is actually how it is done in the U.S. If so, then I withdraw my statement. Here in Mexico, children do not have any sort of propety rights. As wards, anything they "own" is actually the property of their parents. This stops being the case when one enters adolescence at which point…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:07 PM
3

Yep. Only once. A very long time ago, I engaged in what could be called "suspicious behavior" with a very attractive coworker.... by "suspicious behavior" I mean to say I was alone with her and we were talking, laughing , being friendly. It was somewhat flirtatious but definitely not inappropriate. I don't even know exactly what I was accused of, but it put everything I had worked for in jeopardy.... an investigation was launched and I was not sure if my life would be destroyed .... some months …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:02 PM
11

Pre-watch guess; Because men have begun to realize that women are not as important as we used to think. We now have things like e-sports, anime and many hobbies that some men choose to invest time in rather than take that time and reserve it for women. On top of that, there used to be this myth of women being pure and noble.... feminism has very much destroyed that myth and revealed women as being... actually having far worse character than men in most regards. Nicely done feminism, you fucked y…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:55 PM
-1

This is assault, period. This is not a right people should have. Nope. That is asinine to the extreme. You are not helping by attempting to equivocate this with an unrelated crime. This is not "assault", it is not a crime of any sort, however it is unethical. Unethical =/= Illegal. Believe me, I don't like passing laws. I think it should be kept to a minimum and each and every one should be carefully thought out. I believe most laws are wrong. I'm a "taxation is theft" guy "believe me" (insert a…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:43 PM
2

Heart and lungs are also organs? Whats your point? A better question is, what is yours? There was a modifier that went with "organ", pretending it isn't there is at best dishonest, and at worst hardcore retardation.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:38 PM
5

People still watch TV? I haven't watched TV in like 15 years.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:58 PM
1

"Hate crimes" shouldn't exist to begin with, aside from things like "intent"/"motive" in something like a murder case or level of culpability in a negligeance case, emotions should never come into play when it comes to jurisprudence. Justice is supposed to be blind, fair and even handed.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:57 PM
-5

I strongly disagree with circumcision and consider it to be a violation of the Hippocratic oath. That being said, it is very disappointing to see so many people here advocate for a hard government overreach and in some cases, straight up socialism/communism, to deal with this problem. The proper response to a terrible act is not an even worse act. I believe the solution is not to strip the rights of the citizenry and subjugate them as vassals of the state, but rather that we should work towards …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:55 PM
2

Sometimes, insecure people will argue that I am "trying to sound smart" , I try to avoid explaining that english is not my native language and the bulk of my time is spent in an academic/professional setting. But even if that weren't the case, I am always a bit surprised when someone says something asinine like "YOU JES UZ BIG WERDS SO I NO BE ABL 2 UNDORSTEDN" .... what "big words"? The title of that publication , and I strongly suspect the publication itself, are actual, proper examples of som…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:49 PM
0

It is proof all you were doing is bashing You appear to be delusional.... regardless, you seem to have absolutely nothing of value to say. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:44 PM
1

I can't recall any places I've been having segregated bathrooms for children before. Is this the case where you live? Could you show me where I made a statement to the contrary? Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:39 PM
0

Thread has nothing to do with the UK. That's nice. Not an argument. You being hypersensitive and insecure is your own problem, kid.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:39 PM
3

Are you stupid or something? That's funny. Let me know if you have something of value to say.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:38 PM
1

Indeed , facts = bashing. /s
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:21 PM
2

How come they are sexual organs? "How come"? I have no idea "how come", I can tell you the reason for the classification though. They are classified as organs as functional glands with unique accessory tissue, this classifies it as an organ, like the thyroid or the hypofisis. It is sexual because it is an organ that derives from the 23rd chromosomal pair [aka "the sexual chromosomes"]. It is shocking to me how so many people don't know this.... and no, it's not because I am some sort of genius, …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:20 PM
3

OHHHHHHHHHHHH FKING REKT GG.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:39 AM
12

one in three women experiencing physical or sexual violence WHOA, they changed it to one in three now? LOL? It was already incredibly and obviously false at their bullshit 1 in 5 fake stat, 1 in 3 has me in disbelief that anyone can be retarded enough to say it, let alone those that believe upon hearing it.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:38 AM
1

I don't remember saying anything about whether or not it was "okay", I said what is viewed there wouldn't even be a crime in my nation, and it isn't. A strawman argument like yours is what's "not okay".
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:32 AM
2

Doesn't look like it. Not to mention I doubt he'd do it while being filmed. The woman is in her mid 20s, this wouldn't even be a crime in my nation....
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:40 AM
0

It took me way too long to realize you were trolling. Well played.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:33 AM
-1

I'm definitely not a leftist. The only solution to feminism is to keep a registry that keeps them away from men. Does not compute. You are very young. You will understand in time.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:09 AM
1

Are children legally allowed to receive sums of cash?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:07 AM
18

The woman probably had no idea who the father is either.... women today are not like women 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:38 AM
-3

You're completely missing the point..... You are either a hardcore leftist, borderline lysenkoist, or , I suspect you're too young to understand any of this.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:35 AM
1

That's funny. Still, some people rather than joke, are retarded enough to think breasts are not sexual organs. I suspect those people must have trouble putting on a pair of socks.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:34 AM
3

What struck me while watching this film is how many of the white women were so mean to their black servants To Kill a Mockingbird? The old school witch hunt was fueled by exactly the same type of woman, except that one had men being killed directly rather than indirectly.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:32 AM
3

Money is money, so that logic wouldn't stand. However alimony and child support should be abolished altogether... they made sense maybe 100 years ago, but not today.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:04 AM
3

I'd rather die a thousand deaths than be a man living in Florida. That state supports slavery. It is strange to me that so many people in the U.S. pretend this isn't slavery. There are even cases of men being imprisoned for not having enough money for the woman to steal...
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:01 AM
2

The problem is that feminism is so pervasive that it we often don't see it even when it's in front of us. Yes, in front of YOU, probably because you still support their ideas, if at least in part. Feminism is pure garbage, 100% of the time. I distinctly recall my 1st grade math teacher telling the class how she wished that everyone was like the girls who sat quietly at their desks. I rarely make broad/ultra bold statements like this one but; In my observation, women tend to make pretty awful tea…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:25 AM
12

Why is there a drawing of casino indians ? is the implication that somehow white men did something wrong? What actually happened is that the indians lost a war and the victor of that war was incredibly merciful/generous. The northern tribes were extremely traitorous and murderous, they would kill every man, woman and child of any enemy tribe without hesitation, they should be incredibly grateful that they didn't get the treatment they gave to their defeated foes........... this bullshit lysenkoi…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:17 AM
2

Breasts are sexual organs. If women are granted a right to expose their sexual organs in public. Men should be provided with the same right. NOTE : inb4 some retard foolishly tries to argue that women's breasts are not sexual organs.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:13 AM
2

Canada Oh wow, I legitimately would have put my money on the U.K..... fair enough.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:11 AM
3

anti-male sexism Not sure why "anti male sexism" is being used so often these days...... we already have a word for that, it's misandry.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:09 AM
7

I'd like to point out that Mexico, where I was born , raised and will die, considers such an issue hilariously stupid and unnecessary. It blows my mind that first-world nations have actually begun to implement things like this. female teachers are often not good role models for boys, especially since they are often feminists and hate boys. Only a leftist could think the above quoted makes sense. Low level education is almost universally handled by government. If a teacher is misandric or politic…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:06 AM
14

I have played League since beta when it was head-to-head with HoN at 300k. tldr for people that want to know exactly why people are angry about this. LoL was founded by two sleazy guys (Ryze/Tryndamere), who hired a bunch of raging assholes (Guinsoo, Morello, etc.) to make a new MOBA game. They hired another bunch of assholes for various jobs and all acted like assholes on and off the job (Ex: Phreak nailing porn stars was epic win). Obviously their antics were extremely inappropriate but they w…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:24 AM
7

Shock, gasp, how could anyone have foreseen this? /s Men at large : Uhh, this is a bad idea. Putting men, women and children in bathrooms will not end well. Women, soyboys and feminists : U JUS HAYT WYMON!!! WE DOMG IT ANYWEY. Men at large : Alright /popcorn
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:16 AM
1

The medical community does not see the vast majority of cutting. ..... that is one of the most retarded things I have ever read in my entire life and I can't believe anyone would say that without facetiousness or irony. Yes, the medical community see's the majority of "cuts", lacerations and wounds in general. Literally, no other group, ever, can say they have greater knowledge or experience in this than the medical community and it's not even remotely close. You are familiar with some moron att…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:42 PM
1

You assume that men are the one that mold women. Strawman argument. I call troll. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:54 AM
1

Women are not molded. Not entirely , no, but far more than men, yes. They manipulate those around them. We are talking about completely different levels of psychology here. Are you telling me you are not able to understand the difference between women exploiting the male biological imperatives for immediate benefit and men directly shaping the primary filter of woman's, say, structure, morality and work ethic? You are either trolling or extremely stupid.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:30 AM
1

Recognising socialisation does not imply a blank slate. Sure. There are different levels of advocacy for tabula rasa, that's fine. However, at the point that someone is making an incredibly asinine claim like; It is not inevitable that girls will harm themselves more than boys. It simply cannot be separated from the way women and men are generally socialised. ... that's enough to identify the propagandist as an adherent of tabula rasa. "Socialization" is not the reason for the distinct behaviors…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 09:06 PM
0

it's not the state in this case. The government is not exerting any level of force here? as in, would they be liable under some "anti discrimination law" if they disregarded these things? If so then I was mistaken. I am not anywhere near as familiar with German law as I am with the law of my nation or the U.S.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 09:00 PM
0

This is exactly what I'm talking about, I am 100% positive you are failing every single shit test thrown your way. Again, this goes counter to what you've been told but; "Consent" doesn't matter and if you think otherwise, you're wrong. I will give it one last shot.... the problem you currently have, in large part I believe, is caused by you coming off as weak and unattractive to women. You can minimize this risk by being more assertive and confident. This is not my opinion, I am telling you thi…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:03 PM
1

I see. I am not exactly convinced or clear on what such emotional abuse is, but I will start to look into it. Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:56 PM
0

Every other time I kinda guided her through it I understand you think that that's different, but it isn't. I know this goes directly counter to what you've been told, but you are supposed to be 100% in charge of escalation. You are supposed to take charge and, well.... "take" your woman. Women , near-universally, don't want a man that is wishy washy or without initiative. Also near-universally, women find confidence, strong initiative and drive to be comforting and sexy. My read of your story in…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:53 PM
1

They're raised by single mothers in an incestuous emotional relationship. I keep hearing about that. How much do you know? I know very little... but it has come to my attention that a certain type of feminist and SJW, does not view their children as family, and so has a strange resentment and/or sexual attraction to their sons.... and curiously enough, it is always a son. I would have expected FEMINISTS, the legendary lesbianic cult, to be preying on little girls, not little boys. Shrug. Women a…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:45 PM
1

I always want to make sure that you’re comfortable. If we’re doing something and you don’t like it, or you’re not in the mood; whatever the case may be, I want you to tell me. I never want to make you feel like that and it’s better for you to just ask me to stop then worry about it later. .... well there's your problem. I understand the current problem, but let's address the cause. I know your mom, aunt, female teachers and perhaps some soyboys told you that you're supposed to bend the knee ....…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:36 PM
2

Re-post from a few hours ago. tldr of my previous comment; In Mexico , if you promise a virginal teenage girl marriage, deflower the young girl, and then back out of the promise, that is considered a crime very similar to "rape".... but even here, we know what a chaste , moral and dignified woman looks/acts like. The woman in that image... many men have "known her", biblically. Innocent girls aren't broadcasting their private sexual life like that, that's what sluts do.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:25 PM
1

Meanwhile, women are fucking way more than men are, and way more partners than men as well, as a general rule. I believe that has always been the case but at least in the past, women tried to keep it hush hush. Maybe it is a bit more common now but I am positive that women have always been rather loose in that sense but they used to want to protect their lady-status so they were discrete.... Today though? they're just openly sluts, well usually at least.... I mentioned in another comment, recent…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:22 PM
0

I'm not sure if I am reading this correctly.... rules? justification? oversight? rationale aside from meritocracy? It seems to me like government has seized the means of production. The subjugation isn't subtle but absolute.... THIS is what I often talk about and exactly what I mean by "We must protect liberty above all else", in this case, freedom of association and property rights, both which have been apparently stripped from the German citizenry at large. Ahem; Property rights + freedom of a…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:09 PM
3

You are very immature...... and so am I. Actually whenever someone says "penal system" I have to suppress a slight chuckle.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:29 PM
28

“I don’t like working with women—their drama,” she said. It is very strange to me that , in private, nearly every single professional woman has told me something along those lines. They don't like working with other women. However in public, they're all hug hug and friendly with each other.... I understand that women do not operate like men, they don't attack each other openly or compete, but rather undermine or destroy each other from within, but it's a truth that is so obvious yet denied in mo…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:28 PM
-3

In the U.S., I notice a great deal of men have been , in almost a real way, mentally castrated. For some reason the argument "Look at what she was wearing", in your mind does not register. That's insanity. A woman wears certain outfits for certain occasions. If a woman is showing skin, cleavage and legs, it's because of sex appeal. This is so sledgehammer to the face obvious that it shocks me when I see people dismiss the presentation argument. Protip to young men : A woman showing off her tits …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:23 PM
2

Interestingly enough, in one context, that is actually a crime very similar to rape here in Mexico. There is one instance, here in Mexico I reiterate.... and that instance is if the girl was a virgin and you tricked her by virtue of making an empty promise. I.e. if you promise a girl marriage, and I mean VERY SPECIFICALLY PROMISE MARRIAGE [Promising to live together doesn't count, promising to have children doesn't count, promising a future together doesn't count, ti has to be very specifically …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:17 PM
2

. I'm not sure what I am now. I remember going through a similar process. I eventually settled on classical liberal , you may wish to look into it, I think you would be a natural fit. I don't believe women have much good, if any, in them. My father was a ladies man, a real vag slayer type. He told me that women are strongly receptive to the environment men create around them. I believe he has a point and that women, to some degree, can be molded to be less like other women and closer to what the…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:53 PM
0

Their hypocrisy is real. Yep. While I know I come across as extremely abrasive and arrogant in any sort of debate situation, I'm actually a very humble and friendly person that always assumes the best of people I interact with. At bare minimum I assume that others are of the same level of knowledge, intelligence and experience as me... if they demonstrate otherwise then my rating of them drops as needed. .... for me to have identified such enormous groups as SJWs/feminists as being the absolute …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 02:38 PM
6

I would have gone with "communism/socialism" and that wouldn't be wrong, but marxism is more precise. Your answer would be the better one. That being said, you are incorrect about the SCUM manifesto. Valerie Solanas was indeed one of the architects of feminism, but out of the 4 architects (Friedan/Steinem/Dworkin/Solanas) she was by far the least influential. The SCUM manifesto itself was eclipsed by Friedan's The Feminine Mystique or Dworkin's never ending rape books, etc. My point is, it's not…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 02:19 PM
-4

More evidence that single mothers are utter cancer for children. Naturally , this does not include widows. The widows I've met are extremely good parents, as if the women try to do the job of raising their son twice as good due to the tragedy that afflicted their lvies. This is in stark contrast to sluts that , say, don't even know who the father of their son is, or that have many children each from a different father. Or let's say she only has one son and knows exactly who the father is but wan…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:36 PM
4

When I was in my early-mid teens, I stayed up playing Parasite Eve on playstation instead of studying for a biochemistry exam. Lucky for me, Parasite Eve has a lot of jargon that I was able to use, to bullshit my way through the exam. I actually got one of the highest grades and the teacher was very impressed. At the time I was laughing internally but in retrospect, I mastered english primarily through video games so there is defintiely a lot of understated benefits.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:33 PM
1

what drove you to being away on the idea of marriage The fact that there are no upsides and many downsides. Pretty straightforward actually.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 11:14 AM
2

A boy ‘unzipped his flies and grabbed my hand and forced me to touch his penis' Yes , "forced"..... sounds more like she was quite slutty. And I don't know if this is true given that it is purely anecdotal, but I've asked many brits directly if there's any truth to the "English girls are easy" 'stereotype' and I have gotten a resounding yes back from every single one. Cathy Newman is probably not an exception.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:23 AM
19

Hmm, I wonder if there is some sort of word or "term" if you will, for a political system in which the government encoraches on, and eventually seizes the means of production..... HMMMM. I think it was Brahminism. Named after Lord Abraham (/extreme s)
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:20 AM
1

wow you really, truly just have a deep seated hatred of women and women's sexuality New account. SJW/feminist lingo. Complete nonsense. Too obvious, 0/10 trolling attempt.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 09:55 AM
19

In a sane nation; The morons that are in gross violation of hierarchical and ethical protocol would be shitcanned on the spot. The behavior you describe would get someone fired immediately at the office I work in. In a demented/insane nation; Ask for a letter of recommendation and find a new job before you get "MeToo"'d out or just fired for being "the wrong race/sex". It is still shocking to me that nations that are supposed to be far superior to mine (NZ is indeed a superior nation to Mexico) …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:50 AM
0

Yawn, I figured you'd become defensive rather than grateful. To clarify, it is not that I am some sort of genius, it's that you are literally failing to understand things that a 10 year old boy would pick up instantly. The disparity hilarious, gg.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:44 AM
2

The more I read about women, the more I think they don't have a conscience. While it is tempting to go to that conclusion, and there is indeed ample evidence for it, I believe that the issue is that very few women are raised by well rounded, centered and confident fathers. The father is either a total soyboy/mangina/cuck , or he is forcibly torn away from his children. In fact, if I recall, and I don't remember the exact source, hasn't it been statistically proven that fathers tend to be more im…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:50 AM
0

Terrible argument? I am not even arguing anything. When people get BTFO and then try to play it off, rather than save face, it speaks to their very poor character.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:23 AM
1

Scientifically, transgender people are more real than white people. Nope. Let's see these excerpts of yours, perhaps you have something of substance. Overall the weight of these studies and others points strongly toward a biological basis for gender dysphoria. ...... are you serious? you don't read medical publications often and it shows. The above quoted is what we call INCONCLUSIVE . To attempt to base an argument on it is laughable.... at best, it would justify further research, which I would…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:18 AM
3

I have come to realize that my nation (Mexico) is one of the only ones in the entire world that values property rights and freedom of association. I've heard that this is similar in the U.S. but I can't see how since it would be "illegal".... strip clubs in Mexico have a doorman, this doorman checks suspicious people for weapons but also keeps ALL civilian women that are not "kept on a leash" (I.e. have a man that will vouch for her upon entry) outside of the establishment. And there is no speci…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:26 PM
-1

Killing children is nothing new. That's true. Frequent rape of women, on demand, "wouldn't be new" but we don't do it. but it is nothing new. Terrible argument, as I demonstrated earlier. We are at a level of knowledge and tech that we should not be engaging in the grand-scale massacre of human life, unborn children specifically. Mark my words, this will eventually be considered the worst atrocity humanity ever committed.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:01 PM
0

Have men ever banded together and tried to do something that was clearly against women's interests I can think of many examples. However, it is just the same argument repeated over and over; When the time comes to decide whether a woman or a child is more important and thus, receive preference under the law, men, as is my understanding, consistently advocate for the child coming first and the woman second. A topical example is the possible great achievement in the U.S. of overturning the retarde…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:44 PM
-1

That's because your story is ridiculous. I am a straight arrow, I've never been to any such concert. I don't hook up with randos and I don't do drugs.... even I know that the described incident is EXTREMELY common.... you're telling me an actual musician doesn't know? c'mon.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:17 PM
1

societal factors Meaningless subjectivist drivel. Basically echo chamber masturbation level trash. affirmative action See? now we're talking about something substantive. I 100% concur that affirmative action should be done away with as soon as possible. Even the notion of "reverse discrimination" or "positive discrimination" is ludicrous to the extreme [NOTE: Those are often the placeholder terms used for affirmative action's function]. No argument here. Affirmative action is garbage and should …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:34 PM
1

Almost took the bait. I will respond to only one thing; You do not speak for medical professionals. You speak for yourself and only for yourself. The rest of your comment is filled to the brim with red flags , gg'd kid.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:31 PM
-2

I’m a musician and I really did go just to hear the music. Subjectivist drivel and completely irrelevant. The point is, generally speaking, people go for those reasons and you willingly entered that environment. Also, you didn't say it but there is an implication that you were at least unfamiliar with how "music festivals" go down.... I find that implication to be wildly dishonest. If you're a musician, you KNOW exactly what to expect. Your story does not add up.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:28 PM
1

I'm an introvert so getting married is usually simple and less of a hassle then dating all the time. You don't need to get married to be in a long term relationship. Unless you need a green card or access to a portion of inheritance, steer clear. But if I may ask can I hear some of your experience as to do and don'ts? You would have to be more specific for me to give proper advice, but I can give you a general overview if that helps. First and foremost, never listen to any advice women give you,…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:26 PM
0

Oh I understand, you don't know what irony is and think that gibberish is irony. I'm going to say 1/10. If it was an attempted ironic echo, it is nothing more than poorly constructed innuendo, which, is about what I expect from propagandists.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:20 PM
-1

Why play games It gets really tedious when people like you make such asinine arguments/innuendo. At the point where someone demanded evidence from me, the guy using the Null Hypothesis, that's when you should have asked him "why play games". Asking me is nonsensical. Furthermore, my premise has been made crystal clear from the beginning and I can expand on every single point. The propagandist I was responding to will reveal increasingly more severe lapses in logic as he espouses his BS ideology.…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:19 PM
1

I am unfamiliar with how india operates on a day-to-day basis so I will take your word for it on that front. However, whether india or anywhere else, there is no reason to actively violate the rules. I have heard that india has a pretty high amount of corruption, similar but not quite as high as my nation (Mexico), I get that the "woman only car" was a stupid idea. I disapprove. I also get that india has active corruption, like Mexico, granted.... that is still not a reason to start violating th…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:15 PM
0

Your claim. So back it up. Back what up? there is no third option. Specifically, before the DSM went full retard, gender dysphoria was a form of mental illness that would fall within the purview of psychosis. That is to say, a man that thought he was a woman was suffering a disconnect between reality and his perception of reality, aka psychosis. Those that were not suffering this form of psychosis were simply suffering factitious disorder. These aren't "claims", especially not claims that requir…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:08 PM
-6

The mental health profession disagrees with you. Nope. Being transgendered is not classified as a mental illness There is no such thing as "being transgenders" that is a coloquialism. You're thinking of the now uncertain gender dysphoria. The DSM V completely went to shit and mental illness classifications are a clusterfuck. However, speak for yourself, little one. You are wildly outmatched in this area and I can tell you right now you are horrendously/retardedly wrong.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:53 PM
1

Nobody is calling for censorship. Did I say "You are calling for censorship"? The core premise being forwarded is the regulation of art in some way. Whatever method you choose is automatically wrong. Art must be free flowing 100%. But you are a leftist, I have determined that, we will not see eye to eye on issues of liberty, gg.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:52 PM
-3

I get the feeling that following your notions a person considering themselves a member of the white race would also be defined as having a mental disorder. That parses out as absolute gibberish. Try again.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:50 PM
3

So it should be no problem for you to provide links to peer-reviewed research demonstrating this. I could source all of that, no problem. However, the burden of proof is on the one making the claim. I am not making a positive claim, supporters of "transgenders" mythology are making the positive claim; That it is a veridical notion. I'm saying it isn't. It's called the null hypothesis, I'm sure you've heard of it, right? by definition it carries no burden of proof. So present your argument , with…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:42 PM
3

I would say, yes they are. No not really. There is no such thing as "trans", it is a morpheme without a lexeme and thus is complete gibberish.... but I'm going to take to mean that you are referring to the mentally ill; the "transgenders". No. The mentally ill do not have rights in and of themselves by virtue of their mental illness. The rights are already allotted to men in that regard. There are MEN who want to become women. There are women who want to become MEN. Actually neither of those are…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:17 PM
2

"Megan's law sanctions"? what? Prison sentence: Six to 14 months, plus 25 years of Megan’s Law sanctions Oh. So basically a few months in prison and some other bullshit that will be forgotten, ignored or insignificant. Fail, jurisprudence.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:14 PM
1

Actually, the definition is astutely apropos. Only if you're a leftist. "Refusal to comply with law" , hmmm, I wonder if there is a word for people that actively choose to violate the law.... Crime : An illegal act for which someone can be punished by the government; especially : a gross violation of law / a grave offense especially against morality / criminal activity / something reprehensible, foolish, or disgraceful. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crime HMMMMM. You do not agree th…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:58 PM
-2

I got groped at a music festival by some nerdy chick. Obviously that's a joke, but I've seen people present that argument without irony or facetiousness. Given that a fairly large amount of people going to those "music festivals" is also going to get high/hook up with strangers, I find statements like " ZMOG I got groped at a music festival ".... That's like being called a "fag" in some online FPS games, it's weird if it DOESN'T happen.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:53 PM
2

No one assigns anything at birth This. One of the rare instances where I am justified in saying, I "cringe" each time I see "assigned sex at birth". That's hardcore retardation of the highest order. Sex is exclusively a product of the chromosomal configuration of each individual, our unique genotype which makes us human. Specifically the 23rd chromosomal pair or "the sexual chromosomes" as it were. As always, some jackass will try to argue outliers, but, we already know that all anomalies (Ex: T…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:50 PM
6

"Mansplaining" , a concept completely devoid of merit. Should be dismissed on the spot with extreme prejudice.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:47 PM
4

Protip to all the young men here; Never tell your friend/buddy/pal to NOT get married in any significant way. Never commit to trying to help them understand that they're about to make a horrible mistake. Blue pill men will take it as a direct attack and instead of considering your advice, they will go after the messenger , somehow trying to frame it as "your fault". If it's a true friend, a very very close friend of decades, maybe pull him aside and very gently prod him with "Hey, I think this i…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:45 PM
2

SJW/feminist subreddits are just echo chambers. One of the best parts of the men's rights subreddit is that it is NOT an echo chamber. We have people on the right, people on the left, we have people from the U.K. , from Canada, the U.S.... religious people, atheists, heterosexuals, homosexuals, etc. I have yet to see anyone banned .... I suspect the first person I will see is "misleaduon" or something to that extent, I forget the exact name. That guy is clearly a troll.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:30 PM
1

You do not approve of this specific example of civil disobedience. "Civil disobedience" as a concept is nonsensical to the extreme. The example I gave is one where there are extenuating circumstances that merit action. In the absence of these, to put it in the most straightforward terms so there is zero chance of miscommunucation; Violating the rules = bad.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:28 PM
1

many of the women present systematically assaulted these men unnecessarily and unjustifiably Actually if someone is violating a designated area, it is reasonable to act against the infiltrator and does not constitute "assault" of any type. The only way it would be "assault" is if there were a guard that were there that people should defer the situation to. There isn't.... to use a somewhat extreme example, if a man enters the women's bathroom, he should expect a pretty strong reaction. Again, he…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:07 PM
1

Specifically, "yes" in extreme circumstances that merit a violation of law [Ex: High treason] , no in stupid ones like the one in the link [I.e. entering the woman's car just because].
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:04 PM
1

If flagrantly violating rules is unacceptable ... "if"? is there ever a valid reason for civil disobedience? "Civil disobedience" in this case is a placeholder for violating the law....? if so, very very rarely , and not for something so petty. For example, there is a.... well it's not written in law here in Mexico, but it is part of military discipline/military code, that if the president of Mexico is engaging in any kind of attack against the people, or if a high politician is engaging in trea…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:28 PM
-1

You didn't even read what I typed. False. I read it, but found nothing of substance that I could respond to except for an attempt to advocate for communistic notions. It is somewhat tedious to have to explani this to other adults, since this is something you should have been taught as a child , but..... The more broad the argument you are forwarding, the less value it has [If it is reliant on an abstract, the argument is without merit]. The more delineated an argument is , the greater the argume…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:22 PM
1

I make no illusions in my mind with regards to my popularity.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:19 PM
5

Do not support companies like these. Way ahead of you. I had bought the equivalent of about 300 dollars of LoL skins, but haven't put any money into it since I noticed this bullshit began. It is easy because the new skins and champs are very SJW/feminist oriented, so I don't feel I am missing out. What does piss me off though is that prior skins have been SJW/feminist'd, for ex: Sona got a mastectomy in game and in her splashes. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:08 AM
16

Why aren’t people boycotting their event? Boycott unnecessary. Actually I believe the growth for LoL has been steadily decreasing, I hypothesize that once the next big game comes out, a huge amount of the LoL base will migrate..... most people are sick of Riot's bullshit. So yes, they fucked up several aspects of LoL but the dev team becoming hardcore SJWs was definitely a big factor. In S1-S2 , getting suspended or even banned, was nearly impossible. You had to do some seriously fucked up shit …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:05 AM
2

If you can say no without harm then it isn't coercion Key concept right there that basically summarizes this whole topic. Anyway it seems we strongly agree on this, and I echo your sentiment that it is sad that this position is now considered extremist.... especially in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:00 AM
-2

enrollment gap I am uninterested in equality of outcome. I believe I have been polite enough; The notion that everything should be the same is the basis for a political system most people have probably heard of...... communism. Y'know, the one that is directly responsible for over 100 million deaths and counting. There will always be differences between men and women. Attempting to keep it as close to 50% as possible is not only communistic in nature, but it is against liberty.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:55 AM
1

Equality means we address all issues Not everyone that supports men's rights believes that men and women are the same. The college enrollment gap and the lack of activism for men in college compared to women need to be talked about. No it doesn't. You are talking about equality of outcome. I will not say what political system "equality of outcome" is because a lot of people here support that system, but it is the worst that has ever been tried. If you really want to "help men" do something like …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:42 AM
1

And they will say "it's not the same!" when it clearly is the same. Actually no it isn't. Firstly, the "Rosa parks incident" is wildly overblown these days as some kind of heroic act. It was illogical and should have ended with the woman thrown off the bus, but that's not what happened, fine. Emulating such nonsense is without merit, especially when the woman only cars were created for a reasoni.... a stupid reason, but a reason nonetheless. If they really wanted to go down that route, they shou…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:38 AM
1

What was he doing in the woman's area anyway? Yes, I get that it is unfair, I get that it is stupid and it is yet another example of woman being life's easy mode..... that doesn't mean you get to flagrantly violate the rules.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:35 AM
0

Chicks Cons : Will reliably betray a man when the man needs her the most [Seen it happen a thousand times, man loses his job, starts being self-destructive (Ex: Drinking) , is at his lowest point, woman betrays him/kicks him while he's down before jumping ship, it's disgusting] , very dangerous to have around even at the best of times (Ex: The witch hunt), and often unpleasant personality due to issues of hyper entitlement, low sense of honor and loyalty. Pros : Possibly hot body and the ability…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:31 AM
1

No idea what I just saw. Some workplaces have very strange traditions, maybe he fucked up bad in some way /shrug? I am going to guess this is some tradition there, or something along those lines because I have zero clue what is going on or why....
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:29 AM
1

That's funny. But also somewhat terrifying...... terrifying because there are certain people that actually believe something very similar to what you said. They believe things like due process and presumption of innocence just don't matter, that they're not important. Pure idiocy. Without presumption of innocence and due process, government could very easily become totalitarian. After all, they could just imprison anyone at any time for any reason..... nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:24 AM
6

Same thing is happening to Bioware That one was particularly sad. Bioware used to be so good.... Ubisoft is getting the SJW treatment too. Uhh, to be fair, Ubisoft started sucking long before it went SJW..... that's a rare instance where I can't blame the feminist/SJW infection.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:22 AM
1

The issue is that there is a high frequency of m.... Nope. Liberty of expression is absolute and the clowns that pretend otherwise can downvote me all they want, my argument is unassailable. Also, your attempts to circumvent the concept are futile.... then again I guess I can't entirely dismiss the possibility that you are unable to understand what liberty of expression even is. Spoiler; Whether 1% or 100%, a particular style of art is not wrong. You do not get to decide what art is , what messa…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:19 AM
4

No, it's odd to be attracted to her No it isn't. Google says she is 25 years old. I still have no idea what she looks like but even if she looked young as fuck, there is nothing wrong with looking. If you think otherwise, it is you who are wrong.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:09 AM
5

It's just too odd. It's "too odd" for a man to look at a woman? I think you're confused. Again, the golden rule, at least in my day, was look but don't touch. There is never anything wrong with just looking.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:51 AM
1

Either the OP is drunk as hell, or this is the most obvious bait I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:55 AM
7

who the fuck would be attracted to Ariana Grande? She looks like a child. Hypothetically speaking, let's say she IS 12 years old. What's wrong with Bill Clinton just looking? I don't even know what she looks like, and I'm more of a MILF man myself but, what exactly is wrong with just looking?
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:54 AM
6

Bill Clinton is a legendary vag-slayer. Even if he was checking her out, what's wrong with that? he may be old but he's stilll a man. The golden rule, at least back in my day was "Look, but don't touch".
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:52 AM
18

The old school developers were awesome. I remember all through beta, S1, S2 and even up to S3, I would regularly get queued with rioters, like that one that always played Ionia Yi, Riot Pudding and the boyfriend. Jozreal as well. Point being , the old school devs were "one of us" and knew the community well..... however, a lot of the old devs are gone. The new devs, and this is especially true after Riot Damiya committed suicide, went hardcore SJW.... even the champions they develop reeked of SJ…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:48 AM
3

That's a bit before my time, but it makes sense. Back in the .... 60s(?) it was a lot more common to find women like that..... I think women today do not understand the level of power and gratification that comes with being the pillar of support for a family. But feminism/SJW ideology tells them "YOU CAN HAVE IT ALL" and again, we see more single wallsmashed 45 year olds than ever, heh.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:44 AM
2

So what I'm getting here is, they do teach these things, but they don't give them enough importance or emphasis. Is that correct? if so, thank you for the insight. Anyway I still remember my .... was it civics class? back in secondary school, the first class was basically; Mexico has a constitution that ensures you have rights. Howeer, if you get arrested, shut the fuck up and do as you're told.... NO, do not try to be clever or smarmy, shut up, cooperate and you will eventually get a chance to …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:35 AM
3

I agree. However, Dr. Peterson is an excellent stepping stone for inexperienced men to go from blue pill to red pill.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:34 AM
2

I'm not debating that point. Then you have no argument. You're just wasting time. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:33 AM
5

Why? Because I'm not a sperg. I assume you've had sex before, when two people have their hands all over each other, touching, fondling, kissing.... there really isn't any words necessary to know what both want. As sure as you would want someone else to be before inserting themselves inside you. If I were a woman, I wouldn't be going to a man's domicile, alone, let alone take off my clothes and get into his bed.... if I did those things as a woman, they would be for a reason. And that reason woul…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:09 AM
2

Unfortunately that's not what we're actually taught Can anyone confirm? I am from/in Mexico, a corrupt, underdeveloped nation.... I find it extremely difficult to believe that the world's superpower is doing something so important, worse than us.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:07 AM
1

Even if you did, I am a dentist in RL and , while I am not a specialist, dental radiology and etimology are my strongest areas. I am 100% confident that I am not wrong on anything I have said. Anyway you were clearly joking so shrug.....
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:52 PM
7

Dr. Jordan Peterson calls those morons "post-modernists" but I find that the term is inadequate. A better term is "subjectivists". They have no substantive arguments and instead rely on non-arguments to try to sway equally retarded individuals.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:10 PM
4

Lol you Russian piece of shit /u/slotpop I wish I were Russian. Putin-sama is the greatest leader in modernity. He definitely ass stomps that loser Merkel, let alone Justine Trudeau....
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:08 PM
1

Because they step out of the door and around the corner where the button is, silly! ;) That's incredibly rare and is really only done by female dentists that are pregnant and even then, they require someone to aid them to do this most of the time. The reason for this is, we have a "cone" that needs to be at a certain angle. Of course this can be pre-placed while a dentist walks out of the room, but that is leaving a lot of things to chance..... the patient, cone or x-ray could move , thus causin…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:07 PM
2

I understand your point, but I have a lot of trouble believing that anyone could be that stupid....I can't bring myself to believe that even the bottom of the barrel, SJWs/feminists, could possibly reach such an incredibly asinine conclusion. I try my best to not look down on people, and this would require me to view them as actual, proper retards. It is difficult for me.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:47 PM
9

I don't understand why Obama's atrocities are constantly downplayed. That piece of human garbage effectively put in place a system to violate the due process and presumption of innocence of accused men across the entire nation. Yet it is presented like it was nothing..... Serious question, are people in the U.S. not taught that presumption of innocence and due process are the absolute most important human rights of all, bar none?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:13 PM
1

The linked text is talking about crime. Out of curiosity, what did you think was being discussed?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:51 PM
1

A cultural bias would be the representation of one idea or concept over another as measured. The above quoted parses out as gibberish. If I had to extrapolate from what you have presented, you seem to be arguing in favor of cultural marxism. There is no such thing as so-called "cultural bias". Yes, there are some ideas/arguments that are better than others. It's called meritocracy. Meritocracy is absolute and sovereign. if men are more frequently represented as violent thugs as opposed to women,…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:53 PM
1

Physical Coercision should require intent for exampl Oh good point. I had not thought of it like that. However, I have come to realize I am a hardcore extremist when it comes to the sexual dynamics of men and women. I hold the extremely rare belief that adults are responsible for their own behavior and interactions. The correct response to coercion is to go straight to the police. Coercion is just a method of intimidation .... the vast majority of threats are empty and designed to intimidate, th…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:36 PM
11

There are very few people who actually hate an entire sex, I will never get tired of this clip. Anyway, SJWs/feminists very openly express their sincere hatred of men and especially white men. This is very common these days..... are you incorrectly making an absolute argument when tendencies are what are being discussed? But perhaps there is more hatred toward men than women. No doubt there is. It is not my opinion to say women are life's easy mode due to the grand-scale protections and advantag…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:28 PM
1

You can't say anything about art because it is just a reflection of life. No idea what you're on about. That's not what I said and that does not appear to be what you have been saying either. Non sequitur is non sequitur. You also can't say anything about art when it depicts something fake intended to push an ideology. If I have expressed the idea "You can't say anything about art", it was not intentional, nor was that at all the argument I was attempting to forward. Yes, you can talk about art,…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:21 PM
1

it just means that art can be useful as a tool to measure cultural bias. You are correct in your point, but that is irrelevant. I opposed the church when they wanted to censor "violent" or "vulgar" media. I opposed SJWs/feminists when they wanted to censor or subjugate "misogynist content" or anything along those lines. I will continue to stand against anyone that see's the creative content of others and says "That should not be that way. It should be the way I say." . No. I will defend even my …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:16 PM
4

Their ovaries are invaluable. Actually ov.... nevermind. The thing is, women have always been the privileged elite. Being born a woman is life's easy mode and that's totally fine. Men as a collective, WANTED for women to be protected and taken care of. The problem is, women have become hyper entitled, ungrateful and, I almost want to say paranoid but I don't think they actually believe the things they say. the increase could possibly be related to the use of dental x-rays WHOA, you are entering …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:06 PM
13

Hero.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:53 PM
6

Oh my, this is delicious. I guess the old saying is true; Women will complain if you pay attention to them. Women will complain if you don't pay attention to them.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:53 PM
3

Your cognition is crystal clear. Thanks, that's an unexpected compliment but it's always nice to have my analytical prowess praised. Flattery will get you everywhere you know.. ..... your cognitive ability, basic knowledge, ability to articulate language and emotional stability are complete garbage.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:51 PM
1

No it says you have to write a paragraph about why you have zero sense of humor "It was just a joke bro". It speaks even worse of you to try to play it off. I don't understand how or why leftists have such a poor grasp of comedy..... a point can be delivered in a jocular fashion without losing substance. That's what you attempted to do, while trying to retain plausible deniability. I very rarely make character arguments of this nature [This is the second instance in my entire time on this subred…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:48 PM
0

That excuse "Excuse"? what are you talking about? art doesn't need justification or excuse. when they want to show the hordes of strong independent women super-soldiers Who gives a fuck. All you are saying i that you don't like it. Therefore, if you don't enjoy their content, don't pay for it. That reflect your life? The fact that women are protected on a grand-scale by forces beyond our ken? yes, that is art reflecting life. The way it is presented is absurd, but who cares. It's art. It falls s…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:44 PM
5

Female Rationalizations 101. Fix'd. I'd hate to harp on this again, but my grandmother told me a very complex and hyper extensive set of "rules" women had to follow to be considered ladies. This has been completely abandoned. I wouldn't mind working my ass off to pay for a woman's way if she acted like a lady. If she took her rightful place as the support pillar of the relationship and potential family unit. I had a , I guess friends with benefits girl, that I honestly consider to be the only wo…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:32 PM
14

Misandry is pretty common. Misogyny is borderline mythological.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:08 PM
1

These people can't even make up their goddam mind on the percentage that women make compared to men. Even if it were a large disparity.... if women were able to yield the same results as man for less money, why would anyone ever hire men ? Let me guess "TEH PATRIARRRRKY"? the all-purpose plot-spackle of SJWs/feminist. Basically " the Force" of their movement.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:08 PM
2

Where did this come from originally? What statistics did they use to calculate this? Pretty sure that stat comes from taking the collective income of women in a nation and comparing to the collective income of men in a nation. I.e. child level logic, if that. When controlling for all the factors (Years in the workforce, hours worked, days taken off, willing to relocate for more pay, sacrificing amenities for more money, etc.), women are actually paid more than men for the same job. The issue is …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:06 PM
5

I have had many dark thoughts in my life, and suicide is constantly on my mind. I'm a coward so that will never go down. But if things got bad enough, I'd probably go through with it. Nations , advanced and underdeveloped, all severely undervalue men. While women are coddled as the privileged elite, men are discarded. As stated, it starts from childhood, boys having no guidance, with the deck stacked heavily against them while being told that they're at an advantage. It is cognitive dissonance o…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:04 PM
17

It's getting so it's just not worth the risk anymore. Correct. For some reason, women think that the witch hunt is the reason that interactions between men and women have deteriorated so rapidly..... no, that is just part of it. The popularity of MGTOW, even the most extreme elements (I.e. monks) are quickly rising in numbers. Personally, I think this is the best course of action..... not to seek revenge against women, or to seek to harm them, but simply to walk away. I am not a MGTOW but I can …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:00 PM
8

Don't submit bullshit from Fox News. I am not from the U.S. , but Fox News appears to be far more reputable and trustworthy than propagandist outlets like CNN or MSNBC. For example, while he has made some mistakes, Tucker Carlson is generally pretty reliable on giving solid takes on current events. Obviously he is on the right, but he presents the case as it may be, and then gives his opinion. CNN/MSNBC obfuscate, tell half-truths, play word games and do everything in their power to craft a narr…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:57 PM
1

Nothing substantive, only anecdotal stuff. I stumbled unto my fairly awesome jobs dick first simply by approaching the right person and asking to be given a chance to do the job(s). They were like "Yeah okay." but apparently this is something most women choose not to do. Assuming men and women are just as qualified "Qualifications" actually mean very little. Having a title of some type really doesn't amount to much. I know women have multiple (non feminist) PhDs that are on a lower level in term…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:53 PM
1

hahaha all these bitter heteros downvoting me. It speaks incredibly poorly of you to immediately default back to "LOL BITTER HETEROS" instead of actually considering the arguments presented. If we reverse the scenario and someone said "Yeah well you're just a stupid homo, what you say doesn't matter", that would speak very poorly of the person saying it. That's you right now. Perhaps try to understand why men are, more than ever before, strongly rejecting the marriage contract. Perhaps there is …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:42 PM
5

Marriage is outdated if you're not religious. Precisely. Anyway thanks for the friendly words.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:00 PM
1

When we're talking about the legal system, there is no "nitpicking". Everything must be very, VERY specific.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:58 PM
2

You have an argumentative style that not only lacks honesty Says the guy that used a flimsy strawman argument within the first sentence, heh. I am many things, but I am not dishonest. In some cases I have made mistakes, everyone does.... but never have I lied, or used strawman arguments as you did. Seems like you're just projecting, for ex: You claim that my debate style is "dishonest" and yet you do not point out what I have said that is dishonest.... ironically, that is dishonest of you. but i…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:33 PM
2

Verbal coercion can include threats. That wouldn't be "verbal coercion", that would just be coercion. And if there was coercion, the argument being presented would be very different.... I would require evidence or at the very least more details before I could believe such a claim.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:32 PM
1

I do not agree that we need to stoop to the level of SJWs/feminists to refute their arguments. If you believe that is necessary, you are free to do so.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:43 AM
2

Fascinating that you chose to dismiss the first definition "Dismiss"? I included all 3 in my comment. Coercion : to achieve by force or threat / to compel to an act or choice / to restrain or dominate by force They're not in the order within the link , but who gives a fuck.... accept the second one almost as if you were cherry picking the parts that work against your argument. Nope. Cherry picking would require me to be selective and dismissive. Again I placed all three points that Merriam Webst…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:43 AM
-5

he's saying he's noticing a trend in fiction where men are defeated and women are either unscathed or are in victorious positions. And I'm saying that it is irrelevant. It's true that SJWs/feminists push for their propaganda to infect media, that is not in question. No, the question is, should art be subjugated in any way (?) the answer is no, never. My argument would be the same if the reverse were being presented because this is not about either sex, it's about liberty of expression. It must b…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:09 AM
6

This study is a joke and just because we can exploit it as propaganda doesn't mean we should 100% agree, we are completely of one mind. However, I am shocked that there are others here that would argue otherwise.... we are not SJWs or feminists, we should not act them, ever.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:22 AM
0

If you don't think there's an agenda at work It doesn't matter if there is an "agenda at work", video games and movies are art. Seeking to subjugate the art produced by others, no matter how reprehensible that art may be, is a straight up SJW/femininst move. No. I refuse.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:20 AM
5

Back to merit? I hope so. Academia and business should always be as meritorious as possible.... government subjugation of these sectors for the purposes of enforcing discrimination on the basis of sex and race is utterly repugnant.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:05 AM
14

I am not from the U.S. but I would be extremely pleased to see affirmative action completely eliminated. Remember that the actual term used for affirmative action in practice is "Discrimination" ... specifically against men , doubly so against white men. Sometimes it's called "reverse discrimination" or "positive discrimination", which is fucking nonsense because neither of those things exist, it's just discrimination of the absolute worst kind; Government mandated/enforced, legally actionable, …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:03 AM
2

Yes... and I'm sorry. We live in a world where, nearly in every nation, women are a protected class and will be given strong preference at your expense. I wish I could tell you that there was something you could do but unfortunately, she is granted all the power in this situation.... government has her back and views you at best, as a workhorse to exploit, and at worst, a threat to your child and the child's mother. I feel so much anger and hatred and nothing I do changes this. The rage and frus…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:00 AM
9

you could distill anything down to the paperwork No you couldn't . You are rationalizing, quite poorly. The marriage contract comes with extreme penalties for men and is no longer a guarantee of any type that a relationship will endure like it was a long time ago. It's not about the waver you signed, but about the thrill and adventure that made the waver necessary. What? are you kidding? perhaps it is because you are a homosexual that you do not understand the incredible levels of damage that me…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:55 AM
2

Before I check the article... LOL? misandry is incredibly prevalent. If I really wanted, I could go on tumblr or twitter and find 50 people that express outright hatred of men. "Misogyny" is what is a myth. I have never once encountered a man, let alone men, that have hatred for women because they're women. Men that are a horndogs? yes. Men that are generally assholes? yes. Men that exaggerate the differences between men and women? yes. I've meet all of these types. Men that hate women "because …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:48 AM
3

naaaa means way more than zero my friend I guess in a green card situation or perhaps inheritance.... but generally speaking, I disgree. You are not wrong given that it is subjective, but it is true that marriage has been devalued. In my opinion, it has been devalued down to nothing but let's agree to disagree. EDIT : I am very specifically talking about the marriage contract, I'm not talking about children, nor a relationship; You can have both successfully without being married..... I am speci…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:37 AM
4

Don't make this argument. Come on man. Art reflects life. Men receive the overwhelming brunt of violence in real life and are near-universally the ones to enter combat situations, whether a street brawl, a war or anything along those lines. Because of this, one of the usually-bullshit arguments SJWs/feminists make is actually true in this context; Violence against men is normalized and accepted by most nations. Conversely, women are a protected class in real life and in fiction. This isn't "wron…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:30 AM
2

The Guardian Well this article is going to be complete garbage.... the news that a quarter of girls are self-harming – nearly four times as many as boys That's correct. I am uncertain if it is the same everywhere, but here in Mexico the type of woman that "self harms" is just doing it for attention and never does any harm that could be considered significant. When men "self harm" it is almost always extremely dangerous.... for example, a friend of mine lost his job and his girlfriend, he bought …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:27 AM
4

A married man can’t .... yes he can (?). I haven't checked in a bit, but up until 2013 it was at nearly 50% , and I believe it is even higher now but uncertain. I believe that the divorce rate in some cases has gone as high being over 60% at one brief point, if we count people that get married and divorced multiple times. I can understand a man with children not wantnig to leave, I wouldn't agree but I would understand.... marriage though? that's just a piece of paper with no value now, in fact …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 07:32 AM
2

I suspect that being honorable more often comes with long term success. I think that depends on what line of work one is in, but generally you are correct. Honor in the long run, definitely yields greater rewards.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:38 AM
5

However, they fulfilled their prior obligations They were honorable in that instance. Being honorable often comes with losing money. However, what I don't understand is when you're already unbelievably retardedly "I could retire today and live an extremely comfortable life till I die" levels of rich, why do people trade honor for more money ? I just don't get it.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:03 AM
1

Agreed 100%. That woman should not be caring for the boy as she will only do him harm. Anyway I have mentioned in the past that I want a son that I can raise. I want to give him what I couldn't have, and groom him to be an amazing man that will be intelligent, strong, responsible, confident, outgoing and a vag-slayer. A combination of me and my father's best traits basically. However, if I were to find a woman, and we started a family... although I do NOT want a daughter, if that were to happen,…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:30 AM
0

Honestly, I see nothing wrong with this. Obviously she's a horrible person yes, but it is better for her to put the son in foster care where a good couple will treat the child properly rather than the child being in a care of a brain-addled, misandric SJW/feminist piece of garbage like her. I know people that have tried to adopt a child in the U.S. and apparently it's a very strict process with extremely high standards. The child would be well cared for.... here's hoping the woman , if she is re…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:25 AM
13

I had not heard of this, but my initial thought is, although "Katy Perry" whom I believe is a singer that looks like Zoe Deschannel, is an attractive adult woman, what man would be moron enough to rape her? She is extremely powerful and influential. It would be like trying to rob Bill Gates' house, yeah there's neat stuff inside but you're throwing your life away by doing it. I do not believe an actual physician would throw his life away for this. She said Dr. Luke didn't rape her. Well obviousl…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:23 AM
4

Unwanted sexual experience is too vague. I wholeheartedly agree. I've seen in some of these "studies" , use "sexual experience" to mean things like a kiss on the cheek or a brief/awkward kiss, OR ATTEMPT AT IT, on the lips, which somehow places that on the same level as straight up rapes (WTF?) ..... it's completely insane.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:21 AM
2

I dislike having to stand alone on these issues again and again, but come on guys.... what is described there, at least in most cases, is not coercion. Coercion : to achieve by force or threat / to compel to an act or choice / to restrain or dominate by force https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coercing I.e. verbal coercion (31%, n 86), seduction coercion (26%, n 73) That's not "coercion", the first one is simply persuasion, the second one is simply seduction. substance coercion (7%, n 19…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:17 AM
-3

The more information is released about "Asia Argento" the more clear it becomes that Harvey Weinstein was not only not guilty, he may have been one of the many targets of her seemingly amoral crusade of fucked up behavior....
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:52 PM
1

Leftist uses ad hominem! It's not very effective...
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:41 AM
1

Oh I understand now, you're just projecting, got it.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:36 PM
-2

/r/awww Insecure kiddy is insecure.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:18 PM
1

You're conflating speaking an idea with agreeing with said idea. No, that is what you seem to be doing. You are conflating what you dislike , with something being unacceptable. It is fail of the highest order.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:59 PM
0

I just wanted to see if you would catch Actually no. You can try to play it off, but the fact is, you are just very very stupid. This is not the first time you've made a hilariously terrible argument, gg. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:58 PM
-1

Are you obese with a neckbeard Projection, from a desperate mangina. Yawn. You have nothing of value to say, little one.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:57 PM
1

It should be legal. But not okay. Does not compute.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:56 PM
1

" Babies should have the right to consent." okay to say this Yep. Not sure what argument you thought you were making, but all it succeeded in doing is telling me you are a socialist/communist that is against liberty of expression.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:15 AM
1

It may seem random but legally there is a difference between 17 and 364 days and 18. And that's why judges exist. That case would be summarily dismissed.... you SHOULD know this.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:14 AM
-2

if you dont want that drawing but you get it anyway, its sexual harassment? I have no idea what you're talking about, the Asia woman was not doing what you are suggesting so I get the sense you are confused. In any case, this is a point of principle, not specific judgment or determination in delineated context.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:09 AM
-7

He was barely 17 He was barely 17? alright my mistake on that one. I skimmed through the numbers and incorrectly thought he was nearing 18. unfortunately for her they had sex in California, where the age of consent is 18. That's nice. Doesn't refute my premise. Case in point, judges do not obey the letter of the law but rather the spirit of the law. That's their job; To interpret law and apply it they see fit. that she had had ongoing contact with him since he was a child, during which she acted…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:06 AM
-5

Too bad for her. The law's the law. You realize that more than once, the case where a 17.X year old, has had sex with an adult, has been thrown out in the past due to a judge dismissing the case summarily, correct? I am absolutely shocked that so many people here are completely ignorant of basic jurisprudence..... do you understand what the function of a "judge" is? again even at 10 years old I would have been able to refute your premise, very very easily..... this isn't a high merit either, eve…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 05:01 AM
-5

A pretentious douche Projection. thinking they're smarter than anyone else. Your insecurity is not an argument. Ironically the point simultaneously went over your head; The point of my indicating that at 10 years old I could have refuted the argument is precisely BECAUSE the refutation is incredibly obvious. Your desperation is delicious. Its not a "judge's" job to interpret the law. /u/berserkerrage LOL????????????????????? LOL!?!?!?!?!?!? LOL x1,000,000. THAT IS LITERALLY THE STATED FUNCTION O…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:58 AM
-10

Well, to pretty much everyone else, including law enforcement, the letter of the law matters more than the spirit of the law .... do you know what a "judge" is and what one does? do you think these "judges" are a relevant aspect of jurisprudence? lol. Even when I was 10 years old I could have easily refuted your argument. I am shocked that an adult can present such a terrible premise.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:07 AM
-1

By that standard, pretty much only the USA counts as a non-totalitarian nation. Umm, I'm not sure if you know this, but most nations do not do what was described there. I get the sense you are thinking of some european nations and applying it broadly without basis. Socialism requires very widespread public ownership of business. That's completely incorrect. Socialism/communism is the subjugation of the citizenry by the government in terms of economy, human interaction and extremist laws. The U.K…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:06 AM
-4

You are [the opposite] .... of Antifa Antifa are commie LARPers that advocate subjugation and violence, whereas I am against both. You are correct in that I am the reverse of antifa and in fact, that's a very good way of expressing the general position of classical liberals at large; The opposite of antifa. Hmmm, thanks for that one. They label Who gives a fuck about that nonsense. What matters is the quality of the argument. Your "hurt feelings" are not an argument. You label everyone who disag…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:35 AM
-2

calling it "socialist" and "totalitarian" makes it clear that you simply don't know what these terms mean. People being taken from their homes at night to be imprisoned because they said "naughty things" on the internet puts the U.K. at a level where I can comfortably call it a socialist totalitarian nation. To put it simply; Even hardcore totalitarian nations like Maoist China and Soviet Russia didn't go so far as to arrest a man for having a potato peeler....
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:33 AM
5

Wait what? is this confirmed? are there details we are not being told? If it is the way it is presented here, then that is incredibly ridiculous.... if some kid called me "sir", even if he said it dripping with sarcasm, I mean, I'm not made of glass, I won't shatter if some brat acts bratty because .... I'm the adult, he's the kid. Teacher should be fired and possibly investigated for making threats against a child.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:50 AM
20

In case you're not updated, she admitted to having sex with Bennett apparently in 2013 Wasn't Jimmy Bennett 17 in 2013 though? A lot of places within the U.S. and outside don't consider that any sort of crime unless there are extenuating circumstances. I am interested if there were extenuating circumstances there because a guy that is 17, apparently nearing 18, having sex with an older woman just isn't scandalous or interesting to me. I would say the same thing if the sexes were reversed. The sp…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:11 AM
1

Presumption of innocence is a legal philosophy that is applied in court. It has nothing to do with police procedure. What are "Miranda rights" for 500 Alex. d A i L y D o U b L e Specifically, being detained or arrested does not mean you are guilty. This is outlined when you are taken into custody, not to mention Presumption of innoncence is both a legal and ethical tenet which is one of the core foundations of jurisprudence.... this is so mind-bogglingly obvious that I am wondering if you are t…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 01:29 AM
8

"Hey, would you like to have dinner and maybe head to my place for drinks after?" Rebecca Watson seems to think coffee = rape. I would imagine "drinks" = gang rape, in her mind.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 12:30 AM
1

You've offered no defense Actually it is you who need to offer a defense of your tabula rasa mythology. Until then, nothing you say on the matter is relevant. What merit? My argument is that men and women are different. You are an acolyte of tabula rasa so you want to pretend that that is not the case. You have to justify your position that men and women are "the same". Go ahead, little leftist. Present something of substance for a change. All you have is insults. Actually I very rarely insult p…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 11:43 PM
0

Like I said, I get the sense that not everyone here is on board with the concept of liberty of expression. I thought I made that clear in the last comment.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:09 PM
0

It doesnt make what she said ok. Actually it does, by definition. I don't have a problem with her ability to say it. I get a strong sense that not everyone here is on board with that.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:59 PM
1

Your comment does not address the point of legality. Legality goes out the window once a nation's government becomes totalitarian. Anything they say or do is the law. I'm entirely willing to call the U.K. a totalitarian shithole given that people are being arrested for the heinous crime of carrying potato peelers.... not to mention the "jizz ticket" debacle and general plans to control the internet. Imprisoning people for comments made on the internet, on things like facebook, is further evidenc…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:22 PM
1

Call yourself what you like I call myself what I am. You leftists can pretend otherwise. All right, technically Fucking called it. The argument being made is not even remotely close to what you claim it is, just as I said earlier. But it's funny how you try to weasel out of it by arguing "Well technically", well technically nothing, you were lying as you leftists always do. My argument there stands on its own merit and your false accusation is dismissed. that women don't need to ask for men's co…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:20 PM
3

I have a friend who was raked over the coals twice in divorce... and is looking to get married again to a new woman he has been dating Oh for fucks sake, every time I see or hear about that it is just infuriating. These idiots just don't learn.... No matter how many times they're warned, they walk right back into the meat grinder and willingly place their head on the chopping block. Utter madness.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:53 PM
1

If anyone else is wondering what a Tradcon is, see the above poster as Exhibit A. Nope. I'm a classical liberal, but leftists have a notoriously poor handle on logic and reason, so they will pretend their delusions are reality. he has defended sexual harassment and assault of men and boys by adult women with "But men and women aren't the same so you can't compare them!" arguments. Strawman argument to the extreme. This is why leftists are garbage. They have no argument to present and rely entire…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:52 PM
0

It could not occur in the UK as gender selective abortion is illegal. Lol bullshit. The U.K. is a socialist , totalitarian shithole.... pretty damn skippy they would allow and even encourage this kind of thing. The named parties are in The USA. I stand corrected on that aspect.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:51 PM
6

We've been warning men about this for decades but unfortunately, so many young men think "I'm so fucking smart, it will never happen to me!". /facepalm At least the "take-home message for men" is finally being adopted on a grand-scale.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:59 PM
42

Or prenup. Prenups do not work. They can be thrown out by a judge in family court/divorce court. Do not get married.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:57 PM
15

Child support and alimony should be completely abolished. 100 years ago, maybe there was some level of argument to be made, but not today. Men should never be enslaved , especially not via state muscle.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:56 PM
9

Somehow I doubt those two women have any idea why men are choosing not to approach women. Spoiler: Because the interaction has a high chance of being negative, because even if the man is successful , the woman is not worth investing time or money into.... and finally; Feminism's plan has backfired, sex is easier to get than ever and this means men don't need to be in a committed relation to get some pussy. This effectively devalues women even more. GOOD. Let the punishment fit the crime.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:48 PM
5

I see no problem with what she said. She is a cunt, no doubt, but even a cunt has the right to liberty of expression.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:46 PM
-2

There is the question of what is a men's rights position on gender selective abortion? Abortion in general is a grand-scale atrocity. There is no difference between so-called "selective abortion" and just abortion. Killing a human life is killing a human life, period.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:44 PM
1

uk Bceause of course it's from the U.K.....
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:43 PM
1

How is that relevant? "YEAH WELL WHAT ABOUT THE BERLIN WALL?" "You mean that wall that leftists, like you, built to split a nation in half?" "..... b-but muh communism!" 10/10 comeback. the right are the ones today supporting said borders "Borders" are an aspect of nations. Nations have existed for several millenia. You are a trotskyist communist I see. You trotsky psychos never have any argument to present. Why strawman? What part of that large quote was a strawman? oh that's right, you don't k…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:32 PM
1

Hey everyone! according to u/TheMythof_Feminism the Berlin Wall was the essence of liberty Gee I wonder who built and maintained the Berlin wall, oh that's right /u/VantagePoint2018 , it was leftists, it was your type. It took a concerted effort from the right to eliminate the German blockade... also are you too dense to understand that Germany itself was split? yeah you probably are. not violently enforcing arbitrary restrictions I understand that you are a communist/socialist, but non commies …
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:38 PM
1

Nope Yep. Not going to play along with your bullshit strawman argument. Being pro borders is anti freedom. ... that is the most retarded thing I've read all month, and I peruse feminist/SJW content so that's saying a lot. All nations have both the right and the obligation to secure their borders. They must be sovereign within their own borders, which includes securing the border itself. You are confusing liberty with subjugation; To strip a nation and it's people of their rights is to SUBJUGATE …
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:15 PM
1

It's an old Cold-War era concept You are correct. Hence why I always add "underdeveloped nation" or some reference to that rather than rely on the simple "third world nation" concept.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:00 PM
1

how then do most Republicans Strawman argument. Not surprising coming from a leftist. oppose free immigration? No idea what you're on about. Only the most hardcore leftists are against borders, aka; Commies. I think you are strawmanning. Projection. You do not know what "Strawmanning is". It is what you are doing, not what I did. Here is a quote Don't care, present an actual argument. The second doesn't even seem viable when you consider anti-circumcision efforts upset Jewish groups. ... what ar…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:58 PM
0

Link ? Ganon?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:05 AM
22

Just confirms that Netflix is terrible. Lol'd. But yes, netflix is fucking awful.... but we knew that when the Death Note adaptation featured such excellent characters as Light Cucklord, Black L and pro-active Misa, instead of the proper God-complex Yagami Light, European weirdo L and brain-dead Misa.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:04 AM
2

"Jaipur" is in india apparently. It is strange to me that a nation like india, which is somewhere between first-world and underdeveloped third-world (second-world?) is having these problems. I have no idea how the nation operates on a day-to-day basis.... maybe someone from india can explain?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:02 AM
-2

You'd have to define what a "tradcon" even is before I could consider such an argument. SJWs/feminists are leftists, this concept is absolute, I.e. 100% of SJWs and feminists are on the left, by definition. Conversely, the right is highly compatible with men's rights because again by definition, ensuring that the rights of the citizenry are respected is an aspect of liberty which is a core value of the right. On the other hand, liberty is directly opposed by leftists, who value subjugation as th…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:58 AM
3

I'm gay, which is no longer protection. FUCK. I was legitimately planning on claiming homosexuality in a new project where I am necessarily going to interact with women semi-regularly. Well I guess that plan is out the window....
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:14 AM
1

Hence why I added the "political lesbian" part.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:36 AM
1

My point was that, historically, the ruling class dominates the other classes. No. There is no "ruling class" at least not historically, unless you are being incredibly obtuse and only referring to a very very small portion of human history. You appear to be a straight up communist.... So I do think that marxism has some good observations. Oh okay, I was right; you ARE a communist. I don't assume leftists are all communists (obviously), but you are openly declaring yourself as such now. If you r…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:26 AM
2

What if we all stop reading articles written by women so that their propaganda does not affect us? Not sure what you mean. I have been reading propagandist articles by SJWs/feminists for decades and I am entirely unaffected. Know yourself and know your enemy, you will win every battle. We could stop going to the movies where they are doing remake of our favorite movies with their all female cast. Lol, I'm pretty sure that is already commonplace. You are apparently somoene that subscribes to the …
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:00 AM
1

I think I'm pretty progressive You're a regressive? I didn't think there were many here but that's fine. One of the best parts of this subreddit is that it is not an echo chamber. I would call myself a leftist. I've observed that most people here are leftists, yes. But I also despise victim culture. Am I an anomoly? Not sure if serious.... Did you read the part where I said, in entirely unambiguous terms; " Specifically leftists that adopt marxist dogma. " ???? Survey says: NO DEAL. At least rea…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:56 AM
5

How has it backfired? I have been reading, in increasingly frequent manner, women being horrified that their job opportunities at large have suddenly dried up, that men no longer want to spend time with them, that they are being excluded from a myriad of social situations. Now this all might be bullshit, I don't know I'm just telling you what I have read more and more women report online...... in real life, I can only say for certain that I have noticed in my personal life that even in my nation…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:54 AM
168

She'll serve a few months. If that. Sometimes I am glad I don't live in a first-world nation. If a woman like her did that here, to the wrong person say... well, operating outside of the law to destroy a man's life makes someone fair game to those who operate outside of the law, if you follow.....
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:48 AM
6

Feminism is a symptom. Victim culture is the illness. You have that reversed. Feminism is the illness, "victim culture" as you call it, is one of the symptoms. If we delve a little deeper, it is actually the result of leftists. Specifically leftists that adopt marxist dogma. As non-leftists tend to know, one of the lynchpins of marxist dogma is the classic leftist dichotomy that one group is "oppressing" another in some form of class warfare by nearly every rubric imaginable ("intersectionality"…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:43 AM
-2

So you admit this is a casual setting This is. An article/publication that is presumably written by a non-moron, that is also presumably not a trashy rag, is not. In how many ways must this be explained, little one? I imagine you as a person who just loves the sound of their own voice The irony of that statement is far beyond anything you could imagine.... I'm actually a very humble and unassuming person. It just doesn't come across over the internet because the internet is not real life.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:34 AM
2

So she's mad that the only dick she gets is pity sex? I'm 99% certain Germaine Greer is a lesbian, possibly a political lesbian.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:11 AM
3

There are certain topics that I consider myself extremely well versed in, feminism, as the chat handle implies, is one of them. This is not a new argument by her , nor is it a foreign concept to feminism in general. Germaine Greer has been pushing that bullshit since at least the 1970s, she was very notably NOT one of the architects of feminism, but she definitely one of the more prominent figures. She always leaned a lot closer to Dworkin (Radical) than she did Friedan or Steinem (Core). This m…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:09 AM
1

You start with saying society isn't s valid notion. Correct, in the context of any sort of argumentative value it is not a valid notion. What's your point? I came in saying I think feminist isn't a valid notion for the same reasons. .... no, no you didn't, in fact you didn't even present your argument. In any case, are you able to understand what the word "abstract" means? EDIT : In retrospect, you are probably trolling since you did not respond to the prompt. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 03:59 AM
1

My thinking is that unless there is a clear demarcation like a formal group, organisation for example, it weakens the argument. Based on...? what's your argument for such a position? It's fairly simple, anyone that is a supporter of feminist/SJW ideology is a feminist/SJW respectively. Do you believe otherwise?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:50 AM
57

False rape accusations are extremely egregious crimes, even if the target is not convicted, the level of damage to his life, and the undermining of jurisprudence at large are already done. I would say 10 years without the possibility of early parole is a fair sentence. 1 year is a joke, and she probably won't even do half that much....
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:44 AM
1

We can all admit it takes nuance and confidence and physical health most times in order to reproduce. Of those three, you only really need the physical health part. The other two are completely unnecessary given that they can be completely supplanted by foolishness. Lowered testosterone and general blank mindedness are debilitating effects related to anti-psychotics Anti-psychotic medication is not something given lightly.But yes, someone that has a mental illness as strong as psychosis will hav…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:27 AM
-1

No “professor” or “medical professional” should ever say epic fail. Not during class, no. .... was that your argument or are you too stupid to understand the difference between a university setting and a casual setting? epic fail.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:22 AM
1

Feminists/SJWs are leftists that adhere to ideologies that seek to undermine the interests of men through state force. You already know this so I am uncertain what your point was supposed to be.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:20 AM
3

I'd put down this month's paycheck that in the U.S., Canada, the U.K. , Germany and Sweden, men are paying far more in taxes than women, when controlling for all factors. "Pink tax"? what a joke.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:56 AM
3

Given that the U.S. is in the midst of an active witch hunt; Well no shit false claims happen.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:54 AM
2

"Society" is an abstract and therefore meaningless in terms of any argumentative power. There is no "society" unless we delineate exactly what is being referred to. A nation is a valid notion. An organization is a valid notion. An institution is a valid notion. A government is a valid notion. "Society" is not a valid notion, it is an abstract. That's not my opinion, that is a hard fact and I hope other men here learn this because the concept of "society" is being used against you as a shifting g…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:53 AM
-8

You have never been around women, have you? Your projection of weakness is not an argument. Do you have an actual argument to present? probably not otherwise you would have actually presented something substantive rather than the classic simp non-argument.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:21 AM
3

I'm pretty sure women have always leaned towards leftism, the tendency at least , has always been that way. Men have of course, always leaned right in terms of tendency. Homosexual men the exception.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:30 PM
3

In Canada, men and women are equal under the law. LOL. Does anyone actually believe that? at the very least we know Justine doesn't.....
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:29 PM
6

How the fuck you going to PLAN to sexually abuse your goddamn kids? I am not certain of how common it is, but some SJWs/feminists apparently do not view their children as family and indeed plan out sexual abuse/sexual intercourse with their offspring. I have been told by some people that this is more common than one might imagine. I have no idea how common it is... I understand leftism, but I don't know what the % split between center left and proper lefists like SJWs/feminists actually is.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:28 PM
0

Thank you for proving me absolutely and completely right about you with this response. The above quoted is what delusional psychosis looks like. This "brain-addled simp",as you so eloquently put it, schooled you with absolutely zero effort. You couldn't school a sack of potatoes, and your argument is entirely without merit... in your delusional mind, it is probably different though. You have the liberty to pretend that your delusions are reality though, I will not stand in your way.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:26 PM
-1

But actually yes. There are professors with Master's degrees. Indisputable fact. That's cute but irrelevant. So nope. Keep pretending reality isn't a thing, little leftist. Then they are absolutely not doctors of anything. You can keep pretending, but reality does not bend to your delusions. I was actually wondering why leftists are arguing against reality in this instance and accidentally stumbled unto exactly the reason why; Honorific : Belonging to or constituting a class of grammatical forms…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:54 PM
1

Correct. In my nation, witch hunts would lead to dead witch hunters. I used to think such a thing was abhorrent, but seeing the level of damage it has caused in first-world nations makes me wonder if I have been wrong to oppose such a thing..... the grand-scale violation of presumtion of innocence, due process and habeas corpus is very evidently one of the worst things a nation can suffer.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:46 PM
0

you'r being deliberately dense Says the person advocating against presumption of innocence, heh. I'm just advocating for not being a piece of shit to the accuser Advocating against presumption of innocence is YOU being a "piece of shit". Believe the victim was raped No. There is no "victim", only a false accuser until proven otherwise in a court of law, no exceptions, ever. "Listen and believe" is something that should never be adopted and to see it advocated here is shocking. You are complete g…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:40 PM
0

I'm not really interested in arguing That's fine, I already knew you had nothing of value to say, for you to openly admit it is refreshing.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:38 PM
-1

You can be a professor and medical professor and not be a doctor. Nope. Even just being a professor is enough. Professor as in being a "teacher" of higher education. Specifically "doctor" is derived from the word "Docere" which is a latin word which means impart, give knowledge, to apply higher fundament. It has been neologized somewhat to mean "head of medical personnel" (I.e. surgeon, physician, semiologist, etc.). A medical professional / university professor is more than fitting of the honor…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:00 PM
0

i'm not presuming guilt, If you believe that we should "listen and believe" , you are advocating against presumption of innocence and are the maximum enemy of anyone that supports jurisprudence. we don't have to be binary. You are absolutely right. It is not "binary", it is absolute and sovereign. A singular path 100% of the time. It's called PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE . I.e. Every man is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. No exceptions. Ever. , this isn't my opinion, it is the most f…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 09:54 PM
-9

/r/awww It's always cute when you leftists get insecure. You being a retard is not a reflection of someone else, but of yourself, gg'd.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 09:50 PM
-7

Ok. Your point has no merit. Peterson is his name. "Peterson" is his surname actually. Epic fail. culturally Who is talking about "culture"? I know you leftists want to desperately pretend your delusions have merit, but do try to stay on point. Doctor, on the other hand, is a academic or professional (medical) title. Correct. It is a meritorious honorific. It has no meaning or merit outside those contexts. I know you leftists want to pretend like reality isn't a thing but, you do realize that th…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 09:48 PM
0

The latter term was coined by Feminists to describe women internalizing negative aspects of gender roles and as a result behaving in ways that are harmful to other women or to themselves. You believe such feminist concepts have merit? I would like to know more about how you came to see it in such a way.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 09:45 PM
-10

He is very humble, that is true. That does not mean that brain-addled simps like you are not what you are.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 09:43 PM
-28

Regardless of the merit of your point The merit of the point is everything. There is nothing else.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:36 PM
-13

A PhD isn't that special Is that so? So tell me what titles you hold then. Probably none, but even if you do, your claim has no argument behind it and therefore, no merit. Leftist nonsense if ever I've seen it.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:35 PM
-40

Let's not pretend like this is some sort of horrible incident. I get that some people want to make the tabula rasa false equivalence that "men and women are the same and therefore this is the same.", it isn't. Generally speaking men would be pleased if this were to occur to them (An attractive female friend sends them nudes = win), to pretend otherwise is to lie and/or be wildly ignorant of the basic tendencies of man.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:09 PM
22

Because it is an enormous risk with no reward to counter-balance it. I am glad the witch hunt has backfired so spectacularly. Serves 'em right.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:06 PM
-58

I find it highly distasteful for anyone that isn't extremely well acquainted with Dr. Peterson to just call him "Peterson". Being both a professor and a medical professional myself, it is the height of hubris and disrespect to refer to such a person without the well earned honorific.... and no, it is not lost on me that Dr. Peterson himself does not present himself with the title often, I have 12 Rules for Life resting on a shelf not too far from where I am sitting right now and it says "Jordan …
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:00 PM
0

We should simultaneously believe both. No. The woman should be disbelieved 100% of the time. That's not my "opinion" that's the very basis of jurisprudence. We always err on the story being a lie until it is proven otherwise. It's called Presumption of innocence . To suggest otherwise is to advocate for the violation of the most important, most fundamental human right of all. No, a woman that falsely accuses a man of anything is not a "victim", she's a complainant , nothing more until an investi…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:55 PM
1

Eyewitness accounts are still evidence I am not a lawyer but I'm pretty sure testimony is circumstantial, unless it is directly corroborated by actual evidence.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:52 PM
1

No, she does not have a point. "Listen and believe" is absolute retardation to the extreme with zero merit. The only thing that should be believed is EVIDENCE, not stories.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:49 PM
1

Spot on.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:45 PM
1

Yes?
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:21 PM
1

Give me a clear, objective definition and it won't be a matter of belief Fellow objectivist detected. I am pleased to see another. As you say, the real problem is the ambiguous, subjectivist nature of the terms which are malleable to the desires of people willing to abuse them. I do not believe the terms have merit , at all, precisely for the reason you outline. There is no objective definition of these terms, they are meaningless, empty, vacuous.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:21 PM
2

I'll add Jennifer Connelly in Labyrinth, if you saw her in that gorgeous dress they had her wear when dancing with David Bowie, and you didn't know she was only 15 at the time I had an embarrassing crush on her when I was a kid. She was so cute and lovely.... also she grew into quite the gorgeous young woman later (huehuehuehue). I still think she looks great in that film but I didn't know she was 15 , that makes so much sense and is a great point. Another famous example Tracy Lords. Lol, no com…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:11 PM
1

I'm mildly surprised that you would least expect the enemy to be in the best place to attack. Good point.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 02:47 PM
1

/r/awww Desperate kiddy is desperate.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 02:43 PM
1

This explains so much here. /u/berserkerrage , the layers of ironing are thick here.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 02:40 PM
-2

You say not to attack on character yet you attack me because I'm young Actually I specifically said that I would have done better when I was your age, indicating that age is not the problem.... however as I predicted, you did not seem to pick up on this. /Shrug I have not attacked you because you are right leaning I would love to see what you think that would look like. Not even joking, that sounds funny. Grow up and get stay out of these kinds of conversations Lol'd hard. The ironing is delicio…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:56 AM
7

The normal use of "toxic masculinity" in conversation is to engage in casual gender bigotry, and then pretend it's an inoffensive academic concept if called out. I agree with that concept definition and is a great summary of what it actually is. "Toxic femininity" is just a sardonic pisstake foil, intended to highlight the above. Also agree. Except some people argue the point seriously, which is disappointing.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:42 AM
-2

/r/awww The 12 year old is desperate. That's adorable.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:32 AM
-5

Have you ever gone to public school? Yawn, leftist uses ad hominem / character argument. It's not very effective. as a current 10th grader Well that explains why your arguments are so horrendous. Google indicates that a "10th grader" is just a 14-15 year old. You have no idea what you're talking about .... I guess I should have realized this sooner. Actually it's not that you're 14-15 years old, when I was 14-15 , I would have actually presented some arguments, they wouldn't have been good but i…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:31 AM
-2

AKA Toxic Femininity Nope, just government corruption. You can pretend otherwise, more and more I realize that there are a lot of people that are straight up feminists/SJWs that frequent this subreddit and it is very disappointing. This was the last place I expected subjectivist nonsense to be forwarded or popular.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:38 AM
-6

Why are you trying to politicize this? ... do you know what the word "politicize" means? no, no you don't. A government facility condoning or even endorsing propagandist actions by definition is part of politics. Politic = control over the people = government = that facility. That's not my "opinion", that is hard fact. It's not a political issue Government corruption is not a political issue? ok leftist. societal issues Yawn. I am uninterested in such drivel. "Opinions" have zero value, what mat…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:35 AM
-23

They'd give me failing grades on papers I could prove were passing. If that was a public school, which I am betting it was, the government should never have allowed such corruption to take place but rather than combat corruption, it is ushering corruption into key positions like that. I understand that there are leftists here that believe "more government" is the way forward, but I am in strong disagreement with their suggestion of totalitarianism and will continue to voice opposition to it even…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:01 AM
-34

or toxic femininity? There is no such thing. The woman in the picture is wrong in her conclusion, but her setup is flawless. The problem is men are being horrendously abused and mistreated, often cut out entirely out of the life of their son. Obviously their son will suffer as a result of this. "Masculinity" has nothing to do with any of this, it is the government that is giving women the power to do these things against men. The problem is government overreach and the way it gives extreme advan…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 01:49 AM
0

just a guy who spent the last 30 or so years working in IT and just got used to using logic and reason. You dare invoke logic and reason after making the incredibly asinine statement "I don't see why property rights should matter"? I find your contradictions unpallatable..... Unless you're willing to state that business should be totally unregulated Depends on the business, depends on what EXACTLY you mean by "regulation" and it depends if it is a fully privatized endeavor rather than a potentia…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:41 PM
1

Have you even made an argument yet? Many, MANY times. How about you? You either believe that business should be completely unregulated Never once made such an argument. Strawman detected. or you believe that government could regulate business. There is no in between False dichotomy detected. It would depend on the business model, the business type and whether we're talking about the private sector or a government funded/subsidized business. Your all-or-nothing nonsense holds no water. Context ma…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:35 PM
1

I have read your comments for a couple of years now I've only been posting on this account for about 2 years, so I find it questionable that the above quoted is anywhere near accurate. You think most people on r/MensRights are socialists/communists? Show me a quote of me saying "Most people [here] are socialists/communists. Put your money where your mouth is, little one. Substantiate your bullshit claim.... of course you can't because I have never made that argument. 0/10 on that false accusatio…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 10:51 PM
0

I don't really see why property rights would matter. I take it you are a socialist/communist then? What kind of statement is "I don't see why property rights should matter"? wtf? government needs money to operate, hence taxes Show me where I have said taxes shouldn't exist. You will have trouble finding such a statement, and I get that you are a commie , but even a commie should understand that a strawman is a bad argument. Restrictions don't necessarily abridge liberty. Depends on the restricti…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 10:42 PM
-1

Her first album was released the year she turned 18 And that's relevant because....? are you brain-addled? Britney Spears was 16 when she recorded "Baby one more time" and "Oops I did it again" . Your counter-argument? a complete non-sequitur and attempt at gish-gallop. Your argument is garbage. 0/10.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 09:05 PM
1

I would certainly hope they aren't.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 08:53 PM
2

Is this a private university? it does not appear to be the case based on google hits which indicate it to be a "public institution" which is funded by the government , to what degree , I am uncertain. Point being, government institutions are not the private sector, this should heavily illegal and/or lead to complete defunding of the institution in question. If it were a private institution, yeah okay hire whoever you want. This is not part of the private sector. Defund the university and/or fire…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 08:53 PM
0

The government doesn't tell you who you can hire. You're not required to hire anyone, however, if you choose the government places restrictions on what you can and can't do. "The government doesn't subjugate businesses, it just subjugates businesses. IT'S TOTES DIFFERENT BRO." /rolleyes No. I get that you are probably in favor of the government having control over the means of production, but I am not in favor of that. I am in favor of liberty, so we are in direct disagreement, at least in princ…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:00 PM
2

U.K. Called it. Whenever I see a title of something absolutely absurd I always think "This is either a U.K. story or it is a straight up troll article." and it is always the U.K. Anyway she should have gotten at least 10 years without possibility of early parole.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:44 PM
14

I understand what the argument you and the guy in the image are trying to make. It's a bad argument because it's a nonsensical idea even if the pictured individuals were 15 year old women. For ex: In the 90s, Britney Spears did her extremely successful "Baby one more time" and "Oops I did it again" performance on TV and she was 16. While she wasn't in a bathing suit, she was obviously in extremely titillating and that was the point. Prudery = not the correct path.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:43 PM
4

My father told me many times that when he was a boy, women acted like ladies. To damage a woman's virtue in some way was considered a grossly egregious crime. This was because women spent a great deal of time and effort to keep their virtue intact. Being stripped of "lady status" was considered a huge downgrade. I did not get to live or see this, but I understand what he means. My grandmother explained this at length for me and the level of protocol that women chose to undergo was nothing short …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:39 PM
6

I disagree with this. I understand that a lot of people here are socialists/communists, and that's fine, we will not always agree on everything and I wouldn't want it that way either. However, I believe that property rights and freedom of association are the correct way to handle this situation. I also understand that this is an attempt to make an equivalent to women as a protected class with men becoming a protected class. Rather than make everyone a protected class, which is a severe overreach…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:34 PM
1

angry and illogical Projection. 0/10.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:56 PM
1

Its hard to take you seriously Says the subjectivist that faceplanted at the very first argument presented, what a joke.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:55 PM
0

Blind link non-sequitur is blind link non-sequitur. Pfeh, subjectivists always present utter non-argument garbage.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:55 PM
1

You're saying status isn't real. Quotes or it didn't happen, little subjectivist.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:57 AM
1

block you. That is fair, I will counter-block you. Trash like you that never presents an argument that isn't blatant propaganda .... well yes it's worth reading your trash because sometimes it's funny, but mostly it isn't.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:56 AM
1

Not interested. I literally said, in that comment, "We are not socialists/communists" and your go-to argument is a heavily socialist nation that has been communist as well. Your mental gymnastics are well identified now, waste someone else's time.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:55 AM
-2

saying rape on child.... is okay Yawn. False accusation is false.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:54 AM
0

Did you miss the part where I said; after all, we are not socialists/communists. ???? Did you? because the very first part of your argument is; https://www.inspirationalstories.com/proverbs/t/chinese-on-reputation/ Hmm, let's think really hard about this, are the Chinese socialists? Oh that's right, they've consistently been socialists for a VERY long time. Fail. Why even respond to my comment if you are going to waste time?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:03 AM
0

Double post by error.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:01 AM
1

Who cares what someone like you thinks.....
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:46 AM
5

overwhelmingly being used to prosecute men Well no shit.... what else would it have been used for? U.K. Called it.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:40 AM
0

I guess this means women are technically retarded? I mean, that's what this indicates, isn't it? I'm not saying nor implying it, that's what SHE is saying.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:39 AM
1

How did your upbringing Ad hominem / character argument. Formulate an actual premise, little one. Do not waste time with absolute drivel like subjectivism.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:38 AM
2

female sexualization Study finds that 100% of the people that use terms like "female sexualization" and "gender inequality" are completely retarded. More news at 11. [I meant the people that did that "study" not the OP]
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:35 AM
5

he advocated forcibly removing the terrorists Fixed. Yes, terrorists should be dealt with. Anyone that does not agree is an idiot. carpet bombing the gaza strip Terrorists that are assaulting foreign territory should be dealt with, yes. Those are both crimes against humanity AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. No. When someone chooses to be a combatant, they are fair game to be attacked by military might. The terrorists chose to be combatants, period. Putrid scoriae/terrorist supporting garbage like you can …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:31 AM
2

they saw her getting on stage with a microphone Uhhh, is this legit? if so.... I have zero sympathy for the men involved, who would even agree to that idiocy...? in fact, we've been telling men since the very very beginning to NEVER do online dating, ever.... but these men ignore the obvious and instead think they're so fucking smart. Well , let the punishment fit the crime.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:57 AM
1

Most men have the mental stabilty and emotional control to not give a fuck what some rando thinks of them. Let people think what they want to think, after all, we are not socialists/communists.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:54 AM
3

Ben Shapiro advocates war crimes against Palestinian children. Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. gathers breath AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Oh you propagandists are a riot.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:53 AM
1

"gender stereotypes" Ugh, more tabula rasa propaganda.... "Stereotypes" or, statistical significance/pattern recognition/data shorthand, are not a "bad thing" and to suggest otherwise is to actively promote the myth of tabula rasa.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:52 AM
2

That is a terrible idea, whoever wrote that book is a moron and inciting violence against boys. Young boys are not going to take kindly to being deceived and abused, if what is described there happens and a boy naturally takes down one or both of the girls in brutal fashion, which would inevitably happen.... I would vote not guilty to anything the boy would be charged with, assuming I were on that jury I mean.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:49 AM
-1

noone here seems to want to ban the play, and I hope it stays that way. I don't remember saying otherwise, calm down kid.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:43 AM
5

I have no problem with this. If the mentally ill people (I.e. "transgenders") and the retards (below 85 IQ) want to put on a show for each other, I say let them do it.... that being said, if this is allowed, by no logic should "walk on "Dart-sport" girls" in places like the U.K. or "Edecanes" (Models for events) here in Mexico, EVER be forbidden by the government. I get the this subreddit has a LOT of communists/socialists, but consistency is key.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:29 AM
-5

Corruption of a minor. Not rape, still a severe crime.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:27 AM
-1

No quote provided. Leftist drivel identified and dismissed.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:19 PM
8

So incredibly cliché. SJWs/feminists are true putrid scoriae.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:52 PM
19

Actually I would say that the Asia woman is guilty of something far worse than Weinstein ever did. She actually engaged in child grooming and potentially, having sex with a minor over the course of a long time. It is unclear exactly what happened but the evidence , ACTUAL evidence seems to suggest at very disturbing series of incidents. Definitely something that should be investigated by the authoriteis and something that appears to be far more sinister than Weinstein and Asia having sex.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:50 PM
-1

You said the point of the cartoon fails on every level. Quote or gtfo, leftist.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:49 PM
-1

You don't understand Yawn. I understand better than you by several orders of magnitude, that's why I can recnogize a bullshit premise when I see one. You can keep playing along, I will not.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:05 PM
-1

Not necessarily. Nope, yes necessarily. Your failed counter argument was already addressed. Pay attention.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:59 PM
0

That's nice, doesn't change the fact that the argument presented thuis far is wrong.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:56 PM
-4

it's a good point. No it isn't. It fails on every level. You can't have it both ways. Your argument is not a bad one, but it still necessarily requires one to play along with feminist doctrine. No, I refuse. The mythology will not be indulged upon. It will always be refuted. As it should be.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:17 AM
-1

Sweetheart, the concepts "girlhood" and "womanhood" aren't real. They exist only in your mind. Also for those interested in what the non-retarded version of this is; Sexual organs are the result of the physical expression (phenotype) of a set of male or female genotype configuration, barring the most extreme forms of phenotype anomaly, this is always the case. That's not my "opinion", sex is determined by chromosomes, the 23rd pair to be precise [XY = male, XX = female, all anomalies except XXX …
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:14 AM
4

Why would you want to be a feminist? That's like wanting to stab yourself in the brain....
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:12 AM
1

"Sociology" is a joke. Anyone that studied sociology can safely be dismissed with extreme prejudice. Not quite on the level of the hardcore idiocy that is "women and gender studies" but very very close.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:11 AM
11

While I understand that the situation is dire and the woman is a cunt.... I can't help but think that the young girl is quite clever and determined. Nice. Daughter is parental alienation sufferer. She will be put through immense pain and suffering because of the idiot mother, yes.... but more importantly, it is the idiot government that gave the mother that level of power. That needs to be corrected.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:57 AM
0

I had hope that you would have an argument, but it was a hope I knew was itself, hopeless. You have nothing of value to say. I wrote a very simple realistic situation Who gives a fuck. The point I attempted to make, which you were too stupid to understand, was that when I'm talking about an inheritance, I'm talking about a relatively grounded value being received, let's say 200-300 k USD. I get the sense that leftists like you are talking about absolutely retarded values like many millions of do…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:53 AM
3

Ahem, " rape " by the hardest etymological definition means force and violence. Coercion specifically means to compel someone to take an action or make a choice against their will through use of force or threat of force. Coercion is necessary for a rape to take place, rather than the bullshit "consent games" that SJWs/feminists talk about, COERCION is the key aspect but I am positive you and the article from the U.K. you're citing , are using these terms very fast and loose. The "new research" y…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:50 AM
0

Red herring detected. I guess that's a nice attempt for a leftist, but it appears you have nothing of substance to present. I asked a pretty straightforward question and you failed miserably at even understanding it. Again, I shouldn't be surprised. Let's get down to the principle of the matter , I.e. give you one more chance; What is your exact argument?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:46 AM
10

And this is exactly why an equivalent to the protection against "Lynchamiento mediatico" (anti witch hunt legislation) NEEDS to be implemented in the U.S., the U.K. and Canada ASAP. It is not an exaggeration to say that a lot of men today are at greater danger from the witch hunt than of violent crime at all.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:09 AM
1

I have come to realize that a lot of people here do not understand that SJWs and "intersectional" feminism derive a great portion of their concepts, especially their central concepts, from neomarxist ideology. In this case, again, they necessarily have to default back to a filter of the basic dichotomy "oppressor/victim", in that poster, in the mind of an SJW/feminist, that is saying women are "oppresing" (I.e. doing something "bad" to) men, and men are being "victimized". This effectively rever…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:06 AM
1

I look forward to the inevitable cries " Wait wait, no, don't "listen and believe" you guys. We have to respect due process and presumption of innocence . " by manginas/feminists/women at large. Y'know, the usual SJW/feminist hypocrisy but even more obvious.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:03 AM
1

That's a very good point.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:23 AM
3

raped her in the hospital Pretty much anyone that claims a rape took place in a hospital but also have nothing but "their word" is just revealing that they're a liar and an idiot. Hospitals are some of the most secure places anywhere, and the amount of evidence that could be collected from a rape IN A HOSPITAL would be absurdly high. That police officer should not have been charged, let alone convicted. Supremely fucked up
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:14 AM
-1

The narcos have zero power over the government or how the nation is run. The fact that you think otherwise tells me you have a laughably terrible understanding of Mexico. EDIT : A rough equivalent of how absurd what you're saying is, would be for me to suggest that the U.S. economy has always subsisted on, and currently does subsist on, slavery and the resulting aggriculture. It would be hilariously wrong.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:12 AM
1

If the sub is just to discuss anti-SJW topics Didn't I already specifically state that that wasn't the case? I sense you are wasting my time, gg.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:15 PM
6

Now I'm wondering if I could enter a wet t-shirt contest. I don't have any boobs I vaguely recall several stories of men with breast implants that did that. Apparently it went well. I wonder what would happen if one such man defeated all the women, lol.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:45 PM
3

Stereotypes are not a bad thing and are a handy method of using statistical shorthand when interacting with the world around us. A lot of it is focused on 'improving girls' experience' but it it relatively well balanced. "Relatively well balanced"? it's a bunch of subjectivist garbage that seeks to subjugate/indoctrinate children. Seems like some early form of thought policing to prep children for the real deal down the line.... horrid.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:42 PM
1

First and foremost, to have a central hub where people that are interested in discussing men's rights are able to congregate. Unlike manginas/feminists/women, discussing men's rights , or criticism feminism for that matter, is extremely dangerous in modernity. I've been banned from other subreddits for just the vague insinuation that I don't support hardcore leftist ideology.... That never happens here. People here talk about , again , men's rights, but also feel relaxed enough to talk about gen…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:31 PM
2

I think anyone that uses the word "misogyny" , probably see's "misogyny" everywhere. So it was the translater, the guy that made the sign, the guys that put the sign there, the guy that runs the advertising campaign, that guy's mechanic... in fact, if you're male, just assume you're guilty. No, not until proven otherwise, just, guilty until dead, and even then that isn't necessarily true.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:27 PM
2

But it does provide endless entertainment. The wallsmashed women that are seemingly confused as to why they aren't getting treated the same as when they were young and at peak signifiers of fertility. What could have changed? I wonder.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:25 PM
8

Women go into medical school to meet futur doctors and surgeon to marry This is incredibly common. One of my colleagues was working for about the same amount of time as me, but had met a fellow professional, who surprise surprise, was more successful than her... soon after they were married and now she's pregnant. I highly doubt she will return. She didn't even practice for 5 years before quitting. women are not being taught that it is very, very, very difficult to "have it all." Once they have …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:18 PM
0

Skimmed your comment and it does not appear that you have anything substantive to say, but even if you did it doesn't matter. I get the sense that this is , surprisingly, a misunderstanding. When you were presenting your argument on inheritance, what general value did you have in mind?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:15 PM
1

I agree. But the same could be said of the majority of posts, and that was my point. If you silenced the people that aren't talking about the rights of men, then you'd have very little left.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:13 PM
0

I get the sense that when we talk about inheritance, we're talking about very different things. I had heard that leftists had a really 'interesting' argument with regards to "millionaires"..... is that your argument? when you say "inheritance", you're talking about sums of many millions of dollars?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:59 PM
0

benefited from a level of privilege ... you expect me to take a marxist article seriously? You might as well link to Barbie's Teatime Playhouse... it'll provide you with about the same level of merit. "Even allowing for this “environmental” caveat, IQ scores only account for about 10% of the variance in income differences among individuals (Fisher et al. 1996)." Nope. No benefit of the doubt bullshit this time, I already know you took that way out of context. It shows. It is blatant. Wrong again…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:54 PM
1

It seems like you're basically mocking an obvious case study in which a man lost part of his PFC and was then subjected to rages and impulsivity and lack of self-control, by calling it fantasy. Actually the point was you did not present an argument, and thus , neither did I. Let me refute your bullshit premise one last time; The person in question suffered severe trauma to the craneum. The sequels of such an event would likely be completely unprecedented.... such trauma would be the springboard …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:44 PM
1

Btw, for what its worth, everyone lives a narrative That's cute but irrelevant. Reality does not bend to your delusions. We all live in stories we tell ourselves What the....... No. That's subjectivist nonsense. Wow, I am shocked that I could have been so completely wrong about you. I feel disappointed in myself for not spotting you outright. Humans are rationalizing machines. No. That is incorrect. I don't think you even know what a "rationalization" is ..... but if you do, that would make your…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:36 PM
1

That's not true. You can arrest brain development by preventing stimulus. Nope. That claim is not only false, but incredibly nonsensical. I can only surmise that you severely misspoke because the error you made in that general argument is a very deep one that speaks both to the atrocious argument itself, and to your character. It speaks very poorly of you on several levels. In any case, I have given you more leeway than I have given anyone, ever, you have exhausted my patience. Your blind link i…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:27 PM
5

Just to provide clarity: 20 women accused (and 1 man), 13 made it to trial, and he was convicted for 8. And the one that got him the longest sentence described her attacker as short and black (Holtzclaw is of European/Asian descent). Unbelievably, the jury believed her. Wait wait wait, whoa, slow down. This guy was convicted and imprisoned for what are apparently a series of rapes accusations of some type, on nothing but CONJECTURE? that is to say, nothing proven, no evidence that implicates him…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:16 PM
2

Men’s rights advocates (MRAs) and anti-feminist men’s groups claim that men now are the victims in our society, of both women and feminism. The beta orbiter that wrote that article is a marxist. Hence his limited cognitive ability defaults back to a "victim/oppressor" dichotomy for nearly all values at large. Are women in modernity, regularly abusing the system and getting away with atrocities that would see a man imprisoned or killed for similar behavior? yes. Men’s physical and emotional healt…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:09 PM
3

Translation : "Why won't those sexist, racist, islamophobic, homophobic, transphobic, earth arsoning, omnivorous, white supremacist capitalist patriarchs date me? I look great at my 43 years of age!!! CLEARLY something wrong with them because I'm a catch!!!!"
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:53 PM
1

So you're agreeing with "experts say" when they fit your narrative of "around 20's" What "narrative"? None of what I said is opinion or ideological, it's all pretty basic stuff. The explanation for why someone like you could, within reason, argue that the "maturity of the brain" extends beyond the point where we consider it fully developed is Neuroplasticity ... I.e. the tendency of the CNS to undergo changes as a result of our thoughts and actions in life. [Ex: A musician, singer or linguist mi…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:40 PM
5

we collectively lack the balls to do that. Maybe in the U.S., but not in Mexico. That women would be politely asked to leave only once, then she would be "assisted" in leaving, if she resists, she would be taken outside with actual force, if she tries to re-enter, she will probably end up with a broken bone or two.... I've seen both men and women get way worse for doing way less than what was described in that story.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:29 PM
1

I can keep going Nah I think we've milked the joke for all we could, it would just be beating a dead horse if we continue, gg.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:28 PM
1

The IQ for a toddler, which you used as an example, should be equal to its IQ as an adult. /u/drkalmenius That is one of the most asinine, nonsensical things I have ever read in my entire life...... and I have read feminist theory/feminist forums many times so the competition is very fierce. Congratulations on breaking top 3. Anyway, no, a toddler does not "have the same IQ to it's IQ as an adult". Intelligence is roughly defined as the ability to identify, reconcile and resolve complex problems…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:22 PM
-2

You know what is much more strongly correlated with success? Inheritance. That's actually not even remotely close to true. A modest fortune can be mismanaged and squandered by an overconfident idiot and this is not an outlier. Stupid people have a habit of burning through money at an inordinate rate. The reason this doesn't happen as often as you might think, is because people don't "get rich" for no reason, they had to have a knack, a certain level of intelligence, of some type, to have succeed…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:18 PM
1

I agree, it is femtastrophic! [Griffisu?]
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:09 PM
1

So what you're saying is, we should organize our society along the lines of the spiders....?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:02 PM
6

I'm more interested in why it switches to Spanish for no reason half way through.... what is the point of that ? EDIT : OHHH , I see now. The problem is , their translator sucked. I didn't realize it was trying to say the same thing in both langauges because the translation, while not "incorrect", does not properly convey the same message in the same "tone". If I had to translate that, I'd go with; Trabaja con cuidado, y asi seguro llegas a tu casa, sin cuidado. Piensa en tu familia / Hazlo por …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:40 PM
6

That is true but is small potatoes compared to the real problem. I'm specifically referring to boys being raised by single mothers by the way. I am much more familiar with that case than girls being raised by single mothers. Anyway children develop best when raised by their father and mother, but at the very least need a man and woman to raise them. Each one provides different types of guidance to the child but , if I recall, studies have increasingly proven that the father is far more important…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:38 PM
6

When I was younger, I was annoyed at the bizarre combination of selfishness and lack of self-awareness that is so prevalent amongst single mothers at large. Now that I am in my 30s, I find it nearly "offensive" that these women, for all intents and purposes knee-cap the child before he has even begun his life. Of course this is much worse with each child from a different father she has , which I have seen become more common as the years have gone by (/double facepalm). I don't know if I have the…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:28 PM
4

The right to not buy a terrible game is one I will defend to the death! /s More to the point, I have pointed out many times that people here use the word "rights" incorrectly, again and again. This is more a general interest story for men at large which involves a dishonest attempt at doing actual revisionist history to favor the SJW/feminist desired history where men and women participated in WWII during the conflict at large. BS. That would never have been an issue if the developers had said, …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:23 PM
5

If so intellectual you are, why leave?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:12 PM
13

the idea is that both genders are equal Because I've been against feminism , producing content and engaging against feminists for so long that I forget that there are people that are still presenting that argument with 100% sincerity. Alright , off the top of my head I will give you three vectors in which feminism fails miserably to meet the criteria you yourself have set, that men and women are "equal", that feminism forwards that notion with sincerity.... Feminist theory and especially corners…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:11 PM
40

It's a basic truth of feminism that men can be worse or equal. Never better. Women can be better or equal. Never worse. 10/10 breakdown of feminism. Comment of the year material.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:02 PM
43

the Men’s Center was taken over by a young woman who announced that it would be overhauled to focus on social justice. ... security? one average guy, even unarmed, in mediocre shape and without training, should be able to take her down without difficulty, what happened? McKenna Sjoden, 19, suspects the Men’s Center will unintentionally be detrimental to male students. "Training men to believe that masculinity is a bad thing creates way more problems than it fixes," Holy motherless goat.... I was…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:32 PM
1

I never mentioned "WGM", I mentioned female GMs Generally speaking, when referring to female players, the preffix "woman's" [title] is what we understand to be said unless specifically stated otherwise. If you knew anything about chess you'd already know that. Pfeh, I have no idea why I have continued to respond to you... the data, which I've outlined numerous times, strongly supports what I am saying and directly contradicts your argument. You fail spectacularly, gg.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:29 PM
1

MRAs constantly tackle issues that have nothing to do with men's actual legal rights, but affect men in other ways. So what? I have no problem with that, but constantly referring to such things as "rights" issues is just blatantly wrong.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:27 PM
2

I jacked off to an electrical socket when I was his age because it looked like two boobs. I want to laugh and say "wtf" but I was a boy once , and back in the day we didn't have endless supply of internet content to draw from so I think most of us have been there, not exactly there but you know what I mean. "Imagination" was your only porn back then.......... more and more I am starting to sound like an old man, gg.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:18 PM
-4

I didn't say a single word about tabula rasa Yawn. That's cute but I am uninterested in your childish evasions and pretense of having merit. The premise of your argument in that instance was the idea that men and women are "the same" and should be treated the same. As interchangeable concepts they would necessarily have interchangeable treatment. That's hardcore tabula rasa right there, and you knew this, or maybe not, maybe I vastly overestimated you.... hmmm. In any case , you are dismissed, l…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:45 AM
-1

discrimination You must have me confused for someone else, at no point have I ever forwarded such an argument. Interesting that you'd suggest I am "becoming a troll" at the same time as you wildly misrepresent me either due to your argument having been trash from the beginning or as a lie/gambit that didn't pay off. In any case, you failed to justify your use of abstracts. There is nothing further to say.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:42 AM
0

some Western nations do not even recognize female on male rape Out of all the garbage you presented, the above quoted is the only thing substantive... and it's not very good. Some nations do not recognize your tabula rasa nonsense because they do not adopt tabula rasa. They raelize that men and women are different and therefore, different situations must be determined as the case may be, rather than some retarded one-size-fits-all concept that people like you advocate for.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:08 AM
8

Once again, that appears to have taken place in kenya, I.e. africa. Hmm.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:06 AM
0

by society I will accept your argument if you give me an objective metric for the concept of "society". If you fail to do this, your argument was complete garbage ..... Go on then. can be termed a rape culture? No. "X happens, therefore X culture" is a terrible argument, worthy of SJWs/feminists.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:01 AM
2

Assuming that screenshot is legit.... Firstly, there is only one rape culture in this world, it's called islam which coincidentally SJW/feminist types like that one inexplicably support. Second, I reject the premise that women are just too stupid to understand/handle an opinion that does not echo theirs. I just can't get on board suggesting that women are human garbage like that, I guess that's one of the reasons I'm not an SJW/feminist.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:29 AM
2

Mexican law is napoleonic law based on Justinian’s code, correct? No idea, law is not my forte, let alone the history of law. That, sharia, and English common law are the three main types in the world. If those are the three archetypes then yes, Napoleonic law probably. In retrospect that would make the most sense given how many judicial/legal terms are derived from french rather than the traditional greco-latin root (Ex: The counterpart to the U.S. "freedom of speech" is liberty of expression, …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:27 AM
2

I see your point, I don't agree at all but I see where you are coming from and understand a bit better how the U.S. works. Just one more thing.... I managed three days on heavy amounts of coffee. The difference between three days and six days is absolutely enormous. The deterioration on a neurological and psychological level does not advance in a linear fashion, it is exponential. I.e. each day is significantly harder to make it through than the previous, etc.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:44 AM
11

No. There is no such thing as "toxic femininity", nor is there "toxic masculinity". The word "toxic" doesn't even make sense in that context.... maybe caustic, but not toxic.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:31 AM
10

Let’s say that you hadn’t slept in six days. I'm no attorney but I am a "doctor", anyone that hasn't slept in 6 days straight necessarily had to have taken some sort of stimulant assistance (I.e. drugs; Crystal meth, cocaine, etc.). Of course there are extreme outliers where people can indeed pull it off without stimulants, but these are mere extreme outliers. Anyway, given that that someone was probably using high amounts of hard drugs, I would most certainly write it down as self-induced psych…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:29 AM
1

I normally don't follow blind links, but you have presented solid arguments in the past and I will play along. For future reference, I highly recommend against dropping blind links in general. Let's do it then, article 1: New research from the UK shows the brain continues to develop after childhood and puberty, and is not fully developed until people are well into their 30s and 40s. "From the U.K.", instantly makes me doubt the veracity and proper methodological rigor of the research in question…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:22 AM
6

I honestly don't understand how anyone can support the left when it is filled to the brim with brain-addled hipster mangina commies like that guy... guys who, coincidentally present some of the worst arguments I've ever seen ["The men's march is not about hatred of women, I am a woman", |"yeah? well you support president Trump! CHECKMATE" (something like that, but presented without irony) .... what the fuck kind of argument is that?] Fail across the board.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:21 AM
49

Court system is corrupt. Yes it is, but to be fair, it is not the system itself, it is the morons that are making these inept calls..... while a certain level of discretion is necessary, they are wildly misusing the power they've been granted.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:17 AM
0

I've had a much easier time talking about my problems with my female friends than with my male friends. You are free to confide in whoever you choose, but I very VERY strongly advise against doing what you have been doing. We are in an era where men are continually at risk, minimizing said risk is essential. Protect yourself and your future, at all times.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:15 AM
0

the right to feel vulnerable I'm starting to realize that some people have no idea what "rights" even are.... though to be fair, I have come to the conclusion that a lot of guys have been raised to think and speak through a filter of subjectivism, which lends itself to absolute drivel being presented. So for every one of you out there, don't bottle it up Anything you say can and will be used against you. I wouldn't be advocating for men to do something so foolish.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:40 AM
-7

Yawn. Non-argument/drivel detected, dismissed.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 12:06 AM
-4

Such are the fuel of Insecurities. No. You're completely wrong. Insecurity is mainly self-produced and is a psychological concept. Clinical depression is a psychiatric concept. Again these are not equivalent. You are talking nonsense, gg.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:59 PM
-6

No one is safe from depression nor insecurity. Clinical depression is an actual psychiatric illness. Being insecure is not. These are not equivalent.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:48 PM
9

Oh gee, it's almost as if many of us said that that's exactly what would happen even in the best case scenario.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:42 PM
-9

spreading awareness "We need to make it socially accepted" is not "spreadnig awareness", that is seeking to subjugate others. that statement is as helpful as "stop being depressed" and "don't commit suicide" Nope. Being insecure is very different from being clinically depressed or having sucidal ideation, to even suggest otherwise tells me you have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:24 PM
5

The brain doesnt mature until the 30's to 40's. The brain doesnt mature until the 30's to 40's. I'm pretty sure that is completely incorrect. The human brain becomes fully developed at about 20 years of age, not 40.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:22 PM
9

I see nothing wrong with it. The cut-aways imply that these were recorded separately (obviously), but even if they weren't, that isn't anything above what you can already see at a beach. I have no problem with women advertising their body in slutty ways, that's fine. As long as it does not escalate to actual sexual activity between them and young boys.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:19 PM
-17

No. "Making" anything "socially accepted" is what SJWs/feminists do. Rather than seeking to subjugate everyone around you, just stop being insecure.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:59 PM
2

it wouldn't be pefophilia because no party is a adult. I'd probably send the 17 year old to therapy. O_o You either have cripplingly low intelligence or there is something seriously wrong with you. Seek help, you are ill.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:58 PM
2

both were under the age of 18, minors ... not sure if serious. So in your mind, hypothetically speaking, a 17 year old having sex with an 11 year old is fine because "both are children" ? this is essentially what you're arguing. Epic fail.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:27 PM
1

some source You made a positive claim. The burden of proof is on you, little one.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:03 PM
1

I have no interest in your whining. What matters is the quality of the arguments presented, not some childish popularity contest as you appear to believe.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 09:39 PM
2

I'm under the impression that the Act (passed in '72 under Nixon for those of you following along at home Yawn. For some reason leftists want to pretend that Title IX, the one we're talking about at least, was created by Nixon. Nixon's title IX was nothing like what the Obama regime created. But I pointed this out already, so it appears your pre-packaged leftist drivel didn't even get off the ground.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 09:33 PM
1

a basic human need to be validated. That is not a basic human need. That is an expression of insecurity. You don't need the validation of anyone but yourself. Of course you must hold yourself to high standards if you want to have any character, but the point is, value must come from within, not from the outside.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:53 PM
1

It's somewhat of a joke. There must be at least one comment in every thread that asks "But what does this have to do with men's rights though?" . Every time.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:09 PM
1

The whole point was some obscure internal inconsistency? ... yes, it's called a joke. Epic fail.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:09 PM
2

None of that is related to the rights of men though.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:12 PM
10

It is my observation that women take rejection MUCH worse than men do. Couple this with them being a protected class and you have a very dangerous scenario. What that woman is doing is considered calumny in my nation, and therefore a fairly serious crime. I'm going to guess your nation does not have that (?).
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:38 PM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights though?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:36 PM
1

You realize that his crazy genetic impact was a result of coercion? It's ludicrous to suggest that his offspring were the results of him seducing all of his sexual partners. While that is true, it is undeniable that women throw themselves at horrible men. For ex: Ted Bundy had a ton of women lining up ass first even after he was caught/identified as a serial killer, that targeted women no less.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:32 PM
1

.... do you? The statement is phrased in the form of a question despite specifically mentioning a numeric value. That's incoherent and cannot happen. I.e. that's the point.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 05:55 PM
13

To them, western culture is f*ed up Given how africa is one of the worst regions of the world , I'm inclined to ignore their thoughts on such things.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:29 PM
-1

Scenario that misses the point. You don't seem to be able to understand basic concepts. That the term is used wrong and the law applied nonsensically has nothing to do with the actual meaning of the word. Epic fail.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:26 PM
2

What is a "faceplanting argument" for 500 Alex.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:25 PM
0

If you were confident in your belief and your intellect you wouldn't try to insult or demean me personally. Skepticism in a suspicious and unverified claim is an "insult" and "demeaning" ? What a joke.... dismissed.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:46 PM
1

racist trolling. That's funny. At least you provided some entertainment briefly. The irony in this is that it is much more likely based on the comments thus far, that you are a troll given the spam nonsense. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:29 PM
1

The copy paste spam is quite obnoxious. You are an absolute waste.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:17 PM
-2

social intelligence Ah, I see now what I am dealing with. The general rule "Anyone that very casually drops an IQ number, is usually significantly beneath average IQ.", which is why I am very hesitant to put a number and stick to vague notions. You are not above 130, you are not above 100 , from what I am observing....
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:16 PM
1

You don't know the subjects well enough to not look a TOTAL ARSE. Yawn. Your copy paste does not impress me and does not refute my premise. You're a joke.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:14 PM
-4

Now you're making things up. Nope. You can pretend like your delusions have merit if you want though. Rape is non-co.... Nope. Rape is , by definition, the application of force and violence for sexual purposes. "Consent games" are irrelevant and a distraction from the facts.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:12 PM
0

Something similar to Title IX existed in the past, but Obama's regime and Obama himself of course, chose to vastly expand the function and form of it to the monstrousity we see today. Not sure how you got lost, this is very straightforward.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:11 PM
1

Let me know if you have an argument to present. Innuendo is not enough.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:10 PM
-9

IQ measures nothing else but your capacity to solve psychotechnics problems I'm pretty sure IQ is the ability and speed with which someone identifies and resolves complex problems. Joining a cult of morons would be a spectacular failure to detect a large series of cognitive failings in both the ideology and the membership. It reflects idiocy.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:48 PM
-13

My iq is roughly 136 but I've been vulnerable to echo chambers and group think as well. If you are 'vulnerable' to echo chambers and group think, I find it difficult to believe your IQ is anywhere near 136.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:48 PM
8

I'm pretty sure a university campus is probably one of the safest places to be, in any nation. The notion that there is some sort of "rape crisis" is pure unadulterated insanity. It's not even a conspiracy theory, it's just gibbering delusion.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:27 PM
1

Apparently that's in Kenya, aka africa. Somehow I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:25 PM
-9

That is not the case, as the current US definition of rape does include a female forcing a male into sex. Nope. Read what I typed again, contrast it to what you're saying and realize your folly. On top of that, never drop blind links, it speaks poorly of you. non-consensual "Consent games" are irrelevant. Rape is strictly about force and violence, by definition. Now to what end, is where the distinction is drawn in the U.S. and why your tabula rasa argument falls apart.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:40 PM
2

"Not always easy"? incorrect, it's tremendously easy. Seeking validation from others indicates that you have severe issues with insecurity. Again, you should consider to some degree, what others have to say.... but your value should derive from within, from yourself.That is what is most important.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:28 PM
1

you accuse an Eastern European former communist Argument from authority. I already refuted it too; Not all socialism is the same, in fact there are many wildly different version of socialism. "Communism" proper has never been implemented and you should know this. Moreover, it is clear now that like other leftists, you are just pretending that refutations to your arguments have not occurred. Again, just the typical leftist nonsense.... you are dismissed.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:09 PM
0

I have tried to say it indirectly but apparently if I don't say it outright, it will not get through. I am uninterested in what your opinion on any of this is. You are a fairly typical leftist from what I can see. EDIT : To explain a bit further, you have completely ignored every core premise I have forwarded. Like other leftists, it's just easier to pretend reality isn't a thing.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:59 AM
1

Once again, deliberately vague non-arguments which ignores the core premise forwarded. I would put down this month's paycheck that you're an SJW/feminist.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:57 AM
-4

Reality does not bend to your delusions. My statements were logical, yours were mythological. That is the difference. You built no argument, you just talked drivel , derived from a completely false premise.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:54 AM
4

Who gives a fuck what "category" some braindead group like the SJWs/feminists put you in? Seek value from within, not from others. MGTOW is more than just not getting married.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:22 AM
1

It is strange to me that first world nations have not acted against the witch hunt. Earlier today I posted about "latinamerica" starting to adopt legislation against "media lynching" [linchamiento mediatico], something already in place in, say, Ecuador, but apparently it will be implemented in Mexico soon. One would think that that the top level nations would get this done way sooner than underdeveloped, third world nations, shrug.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 11:04 AM
0

apart of rape culture? There is no such thing as "rape culture" , at least in the U.S. or Canada.... the U.K., Sweden and Germany definitely have a "rape culture", it's called islam. Has anyone been a victim of female perpetrated sexual harrasment/violence What kind of question even is that? I'd wager that you are a feminist/SJW given how you structured your argument (textbook marxist concepts) and subsequent questions reek of their mythology. I'd say probably most, or nearly all men have been t…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:47 AM
18

Wait what? raping a 5 year old? and there is video evidence? I hope that cunt gets locked up for the vast majority of the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:43 AM
18

Although my IQ is above average, it is not as high as , say, my father. I 'feel' above average is pretty insignificant so I never really consider myself as having any advantage by default compared to the average guy. .... however, more and more , the hardcore retards that form the SJW/feminist ranks make me "feel" as if I am actually incredibly intelligent. "Consequences" have almost always been exclusively the realm of something men suffer. By and large, women have always been shielded by gover…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:40 AM
5

0:00 - 0:20 Is this for real? Oh, she's serious. What a retard.... I was thinking she was being sarcastic to make a point. She is completely wrong. ALWAYS go to the police after a crime has been committed, the sooner the better. "this world is not setup to bring justice to "rape victims"" That's because they're not "rape victims", they're complainants or accusers. An investigation must be performed before determinations of that nature can be made. "rape is incredibly underreported" If anything, …
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:36 AM
1

Science is not whatever you want it to be. Projection. The fact that men currently outperform women in chess is not proof that men are naturally better at chess. Absolute drivel. Your "currently" implies that it is a momentary thing of "now", where in reality, ever since chess has existed, women were not able to be competitive on the same level as men. That's not my opinion, there are hundreds of years of data to this extent. Your "currently" strawman is noted , refuted and dismissed. As for wom…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:23 AM
-3

So your argument is that people are wrong? that's not much of an argument. We're not talking about slang, we're talking about proper judicial terminology. Your argument is without merit.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 10:19 AM
6

The sign has a point. As I've said before, my grandmother told me to always act like a gentleman ...... towards ladies, towards ladies . Modern women are not ladies so they get nothing.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:13 AM
-18

"it's not rape when it's a woman and a boy" That's actually correct. I knew that tabula rasa arguments like yours were wrong but I wasn't sure how to explain the refutation it in such a way that I could succinctly destroy arguments like yours, I believe I do now. Basically, the way rape is defined, in the U.S. at least, it includes penetration but Not envelopment. I have no idea why this is and why there has not been a new legal term created specifically for envelopment, but this is what we curr…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:11 AM
1

Did you even read the comment you're responding to?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:07 AM
2

Contrapoints is a man. And uhhh, he is right handed?!
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:13 AM
1

That is true No it isn't. The bulk of violence across the board is targeted against men primarily, not women. most male violence is perpetrated upon other males. "male violence"? that's nonsense, it's just violence. Anyone presenting the argument; "Women don't have the privilege of being able to safely walk down a dark alley at night the way men do." ... is woefully misinformed on the crime stats which show us that aggravated assault, battery, murder, etc. are all mainly targeted against men....…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:25 AM
1

women are mere PROPERTY in Islamic societies! Ben Shapiro told me so I don't remember Ben Shapiro saying that.... I doubt that he said it at all but it's possible I guess.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:23 AM
2

Let's assume this story is true; He asked why I was so serious. I repeated it wasn’t funny. That is a horrible response. If a child asks you a question of that nature, you explain, if it is clear they are not able to understand or don't give a fuck, yeah you just dismiss the issue, but from the story presented, it seems like the child was legitimately confused and interested in finding out what was going on. The child WILL seek answers on this, it just likely won't be from you next time. I get t…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:22 AM
6

Yep. On top of the fact that single fathers generally produce much more centered, productive and successful children than single mothers, there is a sort of... aphorism/saying (?) or something like that which clarifies; "A woman is the support pillar of the family unit." And I firmly believe that to be true. Two different parts, if trying to substitute one another, can only do it at greatly diminished capacity. I vaguely recall this , but aren't women directly responsible for compassion and tend…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:15 AM
4

Stop pretending to be an MRA. I don't remember ever declaring myself an MRA. The usual line I will use is "I don't consider myself an MRA but I am sympathetic to their cause". The reason I don't consider myself an MRA is because I don't participate in any activism and I would consider it hypocritical to call myself an activist without.... well, doing activism. triggered hard, such a hypocrite. Nope. Baseless claims are baseless.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:10 AM
2

Where are those stats coming from? the site is blatantly selling a product and a narrative.... and that's fine normally, but it seems to me that is definitely skewing the data selection process. 33% of men are submissives and 18% are switches vs. 24% woman who are either dominates (8%) or switches (16%). 48% of men are dominates and 18% Switches vs. 75% of women who are submissives and 16% are switches. I am positive that those numbers are bullshit. I would have no idea where to look for more re…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:04 AM
5

Alrighty, it seems I have been mislead in the past. Thank you for clearing it up.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:25 AM
2

Hindu(ism) is a religion Hindi is language spoken commonly in India. BUT I HAVE BEEN TOLD HINDU IS THE LANGUAGE. ARRRGGHHHH. Every question answers raises many more questions... in any case, thank you.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:23 AM
2

Oh yeah, the U.K. is way worse off. The fact that people are required to pay for the BBC's propaganda , or so I've heard, seems absolutely absurd to me. It used to be that I viewed the U.K. as one of the premiere first world nations, the example that we should seek to emulate. I am from/in Mexico and so I looked at europe, but especially the U.K. as something to aspire to be. Now I look at europe, but again especially the U.K. and think "Glad I don't live over there....", somehow the U.K. turned…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:07 AM
2

children can always sniff out hypocrisy and are far more observant than adults care to admit. Exactly. Children are not experienced , nor do they have a fully developed brain, but they are highly intuitive and, at least I know for me, when my mother tried to paint my father as some sort of monster, I immediately realized it was bullshit intended to manipulate me. I was 6 years old.... but her stories did not match up with what I remembered hence, her plan failed miserably.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:02 AM
2

on what planet is that 'joint custody'? Planet SJW. Where the points don't matter and logic doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:59 PM
3

Yeah okay maybe not rights in the legal sense of the word. Then it would seem that "rights" is not the correct term to use. Not exactly sure what you're even talking about actually, but it doesn't matter. i just really like challenging myself and my own views and like hearing as many people’s reasoning and views. That makes sense and I see where you are coming from.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:49 PM
2

I think it has been conclusively proven that the pussy pass protects women from consequences in this type of case. Didn't Lena Dunham openly admit to molesting her younger sister at one point? I did some light googling, Mexico is not exempt from this; Apparently when lesbians have the equivalent of sex, in Mexico it is not considered actual "sex" [without using objects]. Very stupid.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:29 PM
8

"Gender" is a semantical concept, a mere abstract. The proper term is sex. A classification based on the 23rd chromosomal pair (the "sexual chromosomes") which is the objective metric we use to determine whether someone is male or female. "Gender" has no objective metric because as we established, it is a semantical concept, a mere abstract (I.e. man = he, woman = she, poptart = it). Feminism/SJW ideology is inconsistent with itself on many things. Tabula rasa is just another incongruous notion …
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:24 PM
6

I have no suggestions as I do not frequent feminist/SJW sites or subreddits. Out of curiosity, what "rights" do you believe women need forwarded? at this point in time women have significantly more rights, advantages and protections than men do. It just seems nearly inconceivable that someone could , with 100% sincerity, believe that women need more advantages but you seem to be the real deal and I find it fascinating.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:22 PM
0

That's right, keep pretending. Let me know when you are ready, if ever, to put your money where your mouth is, little one. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:55 PM
0

She doesn't say a single thing about "Marxism" in the video. I explained exactly what aspect she is reflecting in her argument. It's cute that you pretend I didn't specifically point it out though. You appear to be obsessed to the point of mental illness/paranoia about alleged communists hiding behind every tree. Hey kid, marxism =/= communism. Your posts here -- which almost invariably revolve around your Alex Jonesian delusions about an international communist/illuminati conspiracy /popcorn Wh…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:49 PM
-1

That's some pretty good trolling there. Yawn. Not trolling. You are free to pretend otherwise, obviously you have no counter-argument and that's why you presented nothing of substance.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:48 PM
5

Actually that strikes me more as a classic psychopath given the fact that he apparently stabbed someone , presumably more than once, then coldly/measuredly protected himself from prosecution afterward indicating a full understanding of his actions.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:26 PM
8

I hope this escalates and brutallizes the University of California. The kangaroo courts that Obama instituted are nothing but a farce.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:25 PM
11

The Count Dankula incident already proved that Scotland is too stupid to have a functional justice system. Which is strange because I thought the Scottish would be the last people to turn full fledged mangina/male feminist,SJW.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:23 PM
2

Is it Indian, Hindu, Hindi or none of the above? It seems like no matter what I pick, it is always wrong.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:22 PM
-11

It's even more pathetic considering what a joke Trump is. What are you measuring him against to get that result? He is certainly better than the piece of human garbage you had for 8 years before him. Obama was a terrible president and corrupt to the extreme. That Obama was not impeached for any of his many atrocities is a mystery to me. At the very least, President Trump is not committing grand-scale atrocities like the crystalization of idiocy, Barrack Hussein Obama.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:19 PM
5

And CNN is not considered a complete laughing stock because....? As I said in the other thread, it is confusing to me to see people talk trash about things like Fox, given that news shows like Tucker Carlon's program appear , at least to me, to be very much on the level. Contrast to CNN which is like what "news" would look like if I had been in charge when I was 10 years old....
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:16 PM
-1

She's trying way too hard to present herself as an intellectual though. The blackboard, the glasses, the hair.... overcompensating, somewhat suspicious. 0:40 I knew it. The overcompensating is deliberate, she's trying to obfuscate the fact that her arguments are complete trash. She's a typical leftist/marxist, running off of the incredibly flawed dynamic of "oppressor/victim" to the point where she views a witch hunt in a positive light. Just a typical feminist/SJW spewing the typical propaganda…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:15 PM
5

NBC further admitting that it is a complete joke. It is always confusing to me to see people from the U.S. talk trash about Fox. From what I have observed, it is significantly more reputable than absolute garbo like NBC or CNN.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:11 PM
1

Close to 0% of the women wore a hijab. I was under the impression that the garment, such as a hijab, was not optional (?). I had the very strong impression that islam is not flexible. Apparently I was wrong? I am legitimately uncertain. I get that there are different types of islam with different rules, but I thought this aspect was universal (???). I ask with sincerity, this is completely new to me. I legitimately thought the hijab was obligatory.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:08 PM
0

Germany and UK are a bit dystopian, but not far-leftist. You are incorrect. Germany and the U.K. are hardcore leftists, arguably some of the prime examples of hardcore leftist nations. There is a free market in place It's not a truly "free market" if regulations, severe restrictions and taxations exist, both nations exhibit this. I was born in communism and lived quite a bit before the revolution I believe you. But I'm not saying these are communist nations , I'm saying they're extremely to the …
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:10 PM
8

I would guess because women are cattered to and coddled their entire lives whereas men take the full brunt of the damage dealt by life. This extends to simple things like stress but also to more complex things like government subjugation.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:45 PM
1

Then we have the centrists: Germany.... UK Lol. Germany and the U.K. are hardcore leftist. You seem to be conflating leftism with just a higher tax rate. While that is a factor, that is just one of many aspects of leftism. Both Germany and the U.K. are dystopian police states with high welfare and high subjugation of the citizenry [Ex: The potato peeler incident in the U.K., "hate speech" laws in both, "forbidden ideas" in Germany, etc.] . Then we have the right ones: Austria, Netherlands, Polan…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:43 PM
0

In Europe there is not much "left" I disagree. Europe is hardcore leftist from what I can see. Generally speaking of course.... I really have no interest in debating the details of the Chinese system. Again, the Chinese government directly states that it uses a hybrid socialist model, I don't see much of a debate beyond that. In any case, I've seen this before many times, especially from Sweden and the U.K., they're hardcore leftists but think they're basically in the middle, which is not the ca…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:29 PM
8

No one HAS to donate. This. I have always been completely puzzled at people that whine about "misallocated donations" or anything to that extent. Once you give your money away, you have no say on how it can/will be used. If I donate to some cause , I do it in good faith and expect to see nothing in return.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:23 PM
1

I can’t even seem to remember what I ate 2 days ago, let alone last week. That's a bit excessive. Seek a physician , or better yet, a neurologist... however, this might be something a lot more simple than you could think; Are you getting enough sleep? are you eating right? are you highly stressed? If you answered yes to any of these, these could be the issue.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:21 PM
7

Watching Karen lesb-rape feminists is always very enjoyable. ... I just wish she'd stop smoking/drinking. Karen does not appear to value her health and it is very disconcerting.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:19 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:13 PM
1

there is absolutely no "Muslim migrant problem" in Eastern Europe. Solid. I am glad to hear that things have gone well.... if I hadn't seen what muslims are like with my own eyes, I would never have understood. Eastern europe was wise to protect itself. and you will see how demented capitalist that country is now. I never said it wasn't "capitalist", I said it was a hybrid system. Of course it has aspects of capitalism. My point was, the Chinese government itself directly calls the system it use…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:06 PM
1

That makes a lot of sense and it is clear you are way more familiar on this than I am. Thank you for the information.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:36 PM
1

"Move to US" Great plan, if you can pull it off... My mother and sister are both full fledged citizens (Sister was born in the U.S., mother was naturalized after decades of residency and doing test things). I am fluent in english, have a skill that I can practice (dentistry) and have never committed a crime. I'm also on file as having crossed over to the U.S. many times in my life and never having caused any issues whatsoever. I admit it's been awhile, but the last time I checked the recommended…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:32 PM
2

start thinking about moving abroad for some years That is my plan. I will legally immigrate to the U.S. if things start to get bad. We had completely corrupt parties and candidates/presidents leading the nation for decades, I honestly didn't think anyone could do a worse job than someone like Enrique Peña Nieto (Our previous president; He won the election because he was "handsome", that's not a joke)..... no one can be worse than him I said..... I was so wrong. hopefully you get "socialism light…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:02 PM
2

Oh yeah? Prove it. I've been studying this issue forever now and we still don't know what causes sexual orientation. Just to check, is the leading hypothesis still a combination of human will, environmental, biological and traumatic ? It's clear that some women choose to be lesbians due to their near-psychotic hatred of men. That's true. I vaguely recall reading that women can go from straight to lesbian pretty easily, but men usually have one configuration and cannot alternate. Anyway yes, the …
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:58 PM
2

What kind of an idiot would be a "nice, good man who's kind to women"? Sounds like some white knight/mangina bullshit right there.... perhaps if she had said "a nice , good man who is kind to all who deserve it".
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:49 PM
6

Regret does not equal Rape. One would think that that's obvious but apparently not. I would take it one further; Discomfort and/or dissatisfaction does not equal rape.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:46 PM
1

Document EVERYTHING. Take it to an attorney just in case. Solid advice. It sounds like you are on a very dangerous path. Take necessary precautions to protect yourself as much as you can. Also, who is the jackass that put you on a team with two other women as the only male? this was obviously going to be trouble.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:32 PM
1

I highly advise that Readers look at the researchers details and make up their own mind. This is reasonable and fair. However, I simply don't trust anything coming out of the U.K. in modernity. You can call that prejudice if you like, but I see it more as an observation of what the U.K. has become.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:28 PM
1

she said you did abandon your son even though you didn't? That's correct. To clarify; I had a girlfriend when I was about 20ish (From 18 to 20, 21 maybe?), she left me for another guy. I am positive she knew she was pregnant but I suspect she thought she was pregnant with the other man's child and it turned out that that was not the case. I'm in my early 30s now. I was hinted at this last year and confirmed earlier this year. The mom is a terrible person for doing that to the kid. You have no id…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:21 PM
4

The DSM is a publication with the listing of psychiatric/psychological illnesses. Say, bipolar disorder, factitious disorder, clinical depression, psychosis, etc. I believe the term stands for diagnosis and statistics manual or something like that. It used to be a classification highly regarded across the world due to facilitating diagnosis of complex disorders. Now it's a complete joke that made things unnecessarily more complicated than they need to be.... it is published by the American Psych…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:14 PM
3

Using sex and lies to get ahead. That's not "toxic femininity", that's just femininity. And no, that's not an insult to women, women have historically relied on maniupation, seduction and deceit to be able to stand against what men acheve through ingenuity and force.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:11 PM
2

I'm from/in Mexico, an underdeveloped , third world nation. The advantages women have in a first world nation, are still here, just proportionally less due to the nation being less successful. There is absolutely no reason to white knight for women anywhere, they already have the support of government and the people at large. What do you on this subreddit think about this common custom of our times? I think you are wrong. I don't think atheists, alt-right, regular right or libertarians have a te…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:09 PM
3

WHO turned out to be helpful. Who could have thunk it.. Not too long ago, the WHO was extremely well regarded. Sadly, it went full retard in the past few years due to what I suspect is a high concentration SJW/feminist higher ups. A similar thing happened to the DSM classification, it was pretty useful, but it was infected by ideologues and became a joke.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:07 PM
2

I do not trust any "research" done in the U.K. I highly advise against participating as I am positive your words will be twisted to suit their agenda.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:05 PM
2

Suspended sentence? Community service? Don't forget maybe a year of probation, but yeah, that. I find it very unlikely that she will serve any actual time.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:05 PM
1

if our penis becomes erect, it means we're aroused which is why walking around in public with a stiffy is seen as awkward and why our judicial system seems to believe women can't rape men. I don't think that's actually how the justice system made that determination. I believe it has to do with the difference between envelopment and penetration, but I am not well versed in U.S. law.... I'm sure it has nothing to do with what you're talking about though.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:03 PM
3

Shaheen Khan , the U.K. Ah, well that explains it then. I was going to say, the pussy pass appears to have increased in potency , but it's not that, it's some type of arab woman in the U.K., so she can get away with nearly anything. I don't think she's a muslim, she's not wearing any type of garb over her face [Niqab/hijab/etc.]. Then again, I've started to see videos of "muslim women" that don't follow such rules....
/r/MensRights17/08/18 05:01 PM
7

This is what happens when ideology infects a subject. This. It is shocking to me to see actual professionals working in STEM , that have abandoned objectivity and are running purely on ideology. Check /r/science for a week to see what I mean. But the above quoted is exactly why we must be very careful to never fall into the same path as the SJWs/feminists.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:58 PM
9

I don't think that actually happened. That being said, women can be very annoying when they're over-excited about some trash movie like that.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:56 PM
16

It came in the wake of dozens of allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, who has pleaded not guilty to rape and sexual assault charges. I have still yet to hear of a single piece of substantive evidence that implicates him for the crime of rape.... the guy was a maximum sleazebag, but the women knew exactly what they were there for and did so willingly. From what I read they even joked about it. That's not rape. That's what we call "quid pro quo" corruption. Yeah it's dirty, une…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:53 PM
1

What do you mean? Men currently have no reproductive rights. I think this is something people here do not disagree on. I believe the marriage contract is completely useless and has zero benefits for men. However, if the marriage contract gave men reprodcutive rights, aka, the ability to ensure that his embryo is carried to term by his wife based on the contract she signed, that would go a long way. Of course, this would be specifically stated in the contract. The reason I say this is that if the…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:44 PM
-1

They cannot decide the terms of their own marriage however; this is forced. No. It isn't. That's pure nonsense. If a woman chooses to sign the contract of her own volition that is what we call liberty, not force. Force would necessarily require duress (I.e. think islam). Or are you legitimately arguing that women are too stupid to make decisions .....? it wouldn't surprise me, that is often the SJW/feminist argument.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:17 PM
2

as that's what they teach in school after all. Wait what? do they actually teach that in school? I assume you are in/you mean the U.S., Canada or the U.K
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:21 AM
0

Oh good, we agree your argument is incorrect. Given that you argument was utter drivel, nope. Your argument is incorrect. False. You are talking nonsense. or are you going to be a waste of time again? Projection. Though I commend you on at least openly admitting that you have nothing of value to say. Dismissed.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:13 AM
2

Firstly, people forming a contract of their own will is not "totalitarian" that's actually liberty. Choice is liberty and choosing to do this would not be "totalitarian", obviously. Second, it is significantly less harsh than what is already done to men today, which is tantamount to state sanctioned slavery. And third, I reject your premise that snuffing out a human life is a woman's "bodily autonomy", it is not her body that she is killing.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:12 AM
1

Terms of willingly signed contracts are routinely declared unenforceable and unconscionable Sure. What's your point? When someone violates a contract, there is often a penalty that goes with it, you knew this, right? your argument is trash. I strongly reject your false premise The "false premise" that snuffing out a human life is not a right? that "false premise"? heh.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:50 AM
19

Because feminism/SJW ideology are both internally inconsistent. The point of both is to to subjugate men and benefit women in absence of merit.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:37 AM
2

violating women's reproductive rights It is not a "violation" of anything if a contract is willingly signed by both parties. I also strongly reject your false premise that suggests that snuffing out a human life is anyone's right.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:19 AM
18

Because in my opinion, I should be the last person that has to point out how stupid the judge's decision was. If even I find it abhorrent, the average person should find it even worse.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:16 AM
0

What a waste of time. I have blocked very few people but you're spamming my comments and posts with utter drivel, I will respond and then block you, by the way congratulations on being one of the very few people I have ever blocked. you want to subjugate all personal interaction in regards to bodily autonomy. It is not subjugation if you actively sign a contract of your own volition. Subjugation would require force and any contract signed under duress such as force, would be null and void, obvio…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:02 AM
1

It sounds like you're proposing the exact opposite of that, where marriage creates a justification to violate men's reproductive rights That's literally the opposite of what I was suggesting.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:01 AM
9

you abandoned your child? Shrug. I didn't even know I had a child until about a decade after he was born. This was kept a secret from me. If I had known from the beginning I would have done something. I never abandoned anyone.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:00 AM
1

Because absence of evidence is not evidence of guilt. While that is technically correct, going outside of judicial channels and engaging in a witch hunt is evidence of guilt, at least in my nation (before that retarded commie president we have changes it) , calumny is considered a crime. Calumny (Merriam webster) a misrepresentation intended to harm another's reputation 1 : denounced his opponent for his defamatory insinuations and calumny 2 : the act of uttering false charges or misrepresentati…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:16 AM
13

/facepalm As I continually say, I hate children, how is it that even I can see that this is a horrible choice? shouldn't the judge do what is in the best interest of the child? I do wish they'd mentioned what the woman's felonies were, but even then, it seems like she's at the very least, extremely unreliable and unstable. A terrible fit for a mother. The bias in favor of women is on full display here.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:12 AM
5

if you can't interact with women, it's probably because you're a dickhead. That is so delusional that it is actually kind of shocking. It's not about being able to interact with women, it's abou...... I find it highly likely you are also fat, smelly, creepy and any number of other things women hate, and now you've got a chip on your (narrow and weak) shoulder. Oh. I almost took the bait.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:56 AM
3

You mean a force with no set tenets, checks, balances, and burden of innocent until proven guilty has gone too far? To be fair, the tenet known as "Presumption of innocence" (aka innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, as you observe) is supposed to be a universal ethical tenet and legal human right; The most important of them all. The problem is, ethics is basically the honor system, and the people that drafted these human rights weren't counting on a group of assholes engaging in moder…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:53 AM
3

Well yes. I didn't get into it because I wanted to focus more on reproductive rights, but would you consider it being more viable if the economic penalties were outlined very specifically in amount and length before the man signs his name? as in, the values provided, if any, from the man to the woman, would have to be an amount that both consider reasonable and agree on that could not be modified by any judge. If that change was also made, perhaps it would be viable? Again don't get me wrong, I …
/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter