TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheSonofLiberty Archive

View 0 posts and 594 comments by TheSonofLiberty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The two chief leftist political parties of Germany—the Communists and the Social Democrats—prior to their suppression by the Nazis, had long competed for the support of the working class and adopted divergent policies to fulfill their conception of the best protection of labor interests. In terms of origin, objectives and methods, the two parties were in sharp opposition during the Weimar period. Their divergence on all issues was a constant factor in German politics. or from a different article…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 08:51 PM
0

If you do, then elucidate your claim from a historian and/or poli sci academic, hopefully multiple. Betas are at least supposed to be good at making internet comments right? Should be pretty ez
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 08:31 PM
0

lol the trite claim that nazis = leftists strikes again
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 06:16 PM
1

long term relationship
/r/seduction28/04/19 05:28 PM
1

I also feel like its a mistake i need to make do not ltr, lol
/r/seduction28/04/19 05:21 PM
4

Getting one girlfriend and settling into a ltr is probably the worst thing you can do when you want to become good with women. The tip was to talk to women in his class, since he's still in college. I didn't say to go into an ltr, which was my personal preference after playing the field.
/r/seduction07/05/18 08:57 PM
3

ask women in your class to study. I met my current ltr this way, as well as a lot of other women in college
/r/seduction07/05/18 07:02 PM
2

Lol @ all the removed comments telling OP to bang Mary while every other comment is kept and considered "good advice"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 06:56 PM
2

op doesn't have privileged access into their minds though; he just wants to strawman them as believing every single word anyone else says. it is a good topic for a related discussion on epistemology though, and how someone should figure things out for themselves in today's world
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 05:40 AM
2

isn't there a difference between taking things that you logically agree with and believing every single word he says?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 05:30 AM
1

he's just some random fucking guy wasn't Socrates some random guy that said interesting things? not to mention, this sounds like some authoritarian epistemology where the only Worthwhile, Good Ideas are those given from above by whoever you personally consider "experts"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 05:04 AM
2

ya that rings a bell
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 06:34 AM
4

No, the problem is that we live in a society where men feel the need to get casual sex. Yeah yeah, you can point towards cavemen days all you want, but not every society is like this. do you have some examples? For example, I am reminded of this Orwell passage from Down and Out in Paris and London Ch. 36 - last paragraph is most important: "The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 06:32 AM
2

I actually agree with the comment you're replying too. Don't you remember that one kid the more mean-girls-esk bill pillers here ran off a few years back?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 06:26 AM
12

and tear down the people who frustrate and offend them. There's a lot of this here
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 06:10 AM
4

currently have max dose on 4 different anxiety/depression meds how do you function on that. that seems like a lot
/r/seduction25/11/17 09:08 AM
9

lol you're just weaseling out of calling them insane and unstable in your OP comment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:24 AM
1

and sometimes professionals have their own ideologies they wittingly or unwittingly uphold
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 12:35 AM
2

which study(s) disproves the concept of human hierarchies?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 12:34 AM
1

right, because being against the authoritarianism latent in the way christianity structures its society (like saying gays should be allowed to marry, abortion, intelligent design anti-evolution propaganda, etc.) is only saying "christianity is bad" Are you a Christian?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:24 PM
1

I just asked about the reasons Why is not wanting a a conservative christian reason enough? Don't you say the exact same about muslims?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:04 PM
1

i mean, it seemed like there was a very easy answer: people don't want and/or distrust a hardcore conservative christian as potus
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:51 PM
0

does anyone really have a reason to hate pence? hmm yeah why do people hate a hardcore christian conservative, especially one very close to being potus?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:43 PM
1

how does someone 'command' an anonymous internet forum? who commands ppd?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 12:56 AM
1

I think you'd like Christopher Lasch's book Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged. Apparently it pissed off both conservatives and leftists back when he wrote it (1977). It speaks to these same points that you bring up now. I've only just started reading it but I found a very interesting chapter title: "Corruption as a form of Social Control"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 12:50 AM
1

lol is this another snarky bluepill throwaway account
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 08:18 PM
2

you're talking about stuff that doesn't have any scientific backing So? That's the entire point of coming up with new ideas. Plus, somethings are not going to be able to have rigorous empirical evidence to support it. For example, abiogenesis - good luck proving that hypothesis without a time machine. I mean, I'm not sure where sentiments like these come from. It's like you've never heard of a dominance hierarchy or social hierarchy. Do you think these things don't exist? Or do you just not like…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:30 PM
1

How many alphas do you think developed the internet, power grid you're using right now? that's a good point, but there are many more facets to reproductive success than merely spatial or abstract IQ
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:23 PM
6

nah, it's not your genetics' job to put down your fork, drive you to the gym/barber/store/job interview/social gathering, or teach you social skills That sounds all well and good, but there are genetic components to each and every one of those points.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:21 PM
1

This place fell to shit a year or so ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 11:40 PM
6

Everyone is entitled to their own speech my friend
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 11:38 PM
4

It sounds like you just read Models (a good thing).
/r/seduction17/04/17 02:03 AM
5

it's only a matter of time before we see a marked increase in shootings and bombings by loser men. Already happening (the marked increase). Besides things like labor disputes and whatnot, there haven't been the stereotypical loser-goes-crazy Elliot Roger (or Columbine boys, etc.) mass shootings since before 1950s.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 06:42 PM
1

You can have game and not actually know what it is or even that something called "game" could refer to what you are doing
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 10:03 PM
1

Lol yeah I learned it was useless commenting here a long time ago
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 06:29 AM
1

Here's another one: http://acsh.org/news/2017/02/02/death-rates-young-white-americans-increased-1999-2014-10812
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 11:38 PM
2

Personally I'm less wary of GMO foods as I am the pesticides and herbicides that are used in the cultivation of them
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 08:40 AM
1

Easy there cowboy http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/02/hidden-distress-among-well-off-women-in-america.html
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 08:37 AM
2

A+
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 08:37 PM
8

S/he has always seemed like a troll to me, usually to troll rpers and whatnot. Lack of consistency in the comments is the glaring evidence for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 11:53 PM
2

What the hell dude, why are you being so personal about this? Seriously? This has always been the atmosphere at ppd. Say something even slightly red -> bitter loser! Say something even slightly blue -> greedy bitches!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 01:42 AM
1

Whatever floats your boat. Enjoy your corporate feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 03:52 AM
1

That you think what I said was an "accomplishment" speaks more to your ideology than it does mine. Also not surprised by the rush to equate criticism of Clinton with being conservative.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 03:45 AM
2

I think its just self selection bias of the type of corporate-feminist women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 09:44 PM
1

Its sooo inspirational to be a female Sec of State that helps deny working people in Haiti a marginally higher min wage
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 09:44 PM
1

100% this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 09:41 PM
1

We have a winner
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 09:34 PM
2

This seems oddly like you are trying to shame him
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 09:16 PM
1

You've got admirers groovy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 09:08 PM
3

but I believe the only real privilege that exists is class and money. Then they call you a "brocialist" or "bernie bro" in the most base sectarian fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 08:24 PM
5

One can be an interesting, fun, guy but that is also a druggie loser, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 08:22 PM
2

If
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 10:29 PM
1

I don't feel like writing a long post for this, but to be succinct, I've considered myself a feminist after reading a few works back in the 1800s, basically the first wave, after I found myself agreeing with most of what they said about getting the right to vote, economic independence, etc. However, I don't agree with much of anything that is being pushed in the name of feminism nowadays, such as your example of having to police yourself for whatever is deemed 'microaggressions,' universities ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 10:19 PM
0

its becoming pretty clear /u/sandralees is just another ppd troll to make you type paragraphs while they type one sentence dismissive replies
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 04:00 AM
3

how does that example equate to some significant amount of pua being rapists? if you're running game right, there is no need for anything near rape. period.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 03:59 AM
3

Overall, college students aren't exactly willing to be research volunteers for a study, especially if it is unpaid. People usually use psych students because psych classes usually have something in the syllabus that states you have to be a volunteer to one or two studies, or maybe it is part of their major. I wasn't psych, but in the class I did take I had to do a study and submit a form to the professor. I don't think most working adults are going to take time off to participate in a low paid, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 04:12 AM
2

I don't think it is a direct 1:1 causation, but I will claim there is some sort of heavy correlation here. Men with low T have less muscle mass, more neurological symptoms such as depression, less feelings of "energy," less sperm count, penile issues, more fat (and in different distributions more like women), and less bone density. All of these negative externalities directly affect a man's ability to survive and reproduce compared to men with more testosterone. Of course, our contemporary socie…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 01:59 AM
2

My boyfriend said there no alpha and beta males, at least not biologically and genetically. Don't agree here. Biologically - testosterone and cortisol, for starters. Genetically - genes for risk taking, "better" genes for males, i.e. more phenotypically attractive to females (jaw, waist-to-hip, etc.). the real distinction is between men who are patriarchs and men who are feminine or woman-like. So instead of saying men run a gamut of phenotypes (which this image is also still simplified), it is …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 12:03 AM
1

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 05:52 PM
2

Again, very true. However, I think there are differences in personalities and histories of people that would make different women (and men) have different probabilities of leaving a marriage or straying to someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 10:26 PM
2

Its almost like there are varying shades of opinion between "muh satire" blue pill and "muh misogyny" red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 09:59 PM
5

It's just the Reddit weirdos Blue pill agitation rhetoric strikes again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 09:58 PM
2

Very true, but enough people do get divorced to make you rethink the history and qualities of your current partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 09:57 PM
1

You think men (including yourself) are above all women Not everyone you are arguing against here is a red piller. it's apparent to me that you don't get out very often Couldn't help yourself in including a personal attack could you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 12:08 AM
1

while I generally agree, people seem to be overlooking how establishment democrats have been using identity politics for a long time now in every area but economic class. which is incredibly interesting considering the global and American left was basically doing the opposite from like 1880s-1960s. Capitalists co-opted id politics and it ultimately strengthened capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 04:44 AM
1

Let me guess the Okcupid data again lolololol. How did I know that would be your response? It's almost as if it's the only thing you have to feed your confirmation bias. Well if there haven't been studies besides the analysis of OKcupid data, its not like he has anything else to cite. and then to say that to cite that data was to be "just spergy" seems more like a snarky personal attack than anything else. Calling someone else a "sperg" is a pretty mean thing to do just because they are disagree…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 01:02 AM
10

Americans may elect [Hillary Clinton] ... feminist victory Corporate feminist detected. I find it hilarious so many leftists don't care about electing more conservative, establishment democrats as long as they are women or minorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 07:33 PM
11

i'm just saying it's not some Feminist Crusade TM. no one here was saying it was some institutionalized feminist talking point, but they did point out how interesting it was to see so many feminist writers just happen to have the same sentiment to broadcast the "male weakness" talking point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/16 08:51 PM
3

Why is that? It is speaking to the idea that Clinton is a war hawk and that armed conflicts (re: "humanitarian interventions") will be common during her presidency. There are people high in our security & foreign policy institutions that say Obama isn't being interventionist enough, even though we are already bombing 7 (or 8?) different countries. Now think of what a more war-hawkish Clinton will do with their guidance.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:31 AM
1

No understanding of "chemistry" is complete without knowing biological components (as opposed to psychological) of attraction like pheromones, MHC, and the like. Mmmm, who wouldn't want to be in a study smelling shirts with body odor!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 08:05 PM
1

Have a good day being a 30yo man who still looks to the Internet to find out how to talk to girls, a thing most functional members of society figure out by age 15. So toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:54 PM
3

This. Expecting your son or daughter to just grow up and magically understand dating, relationships, and sex is very naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:52 PM
1

No, its probably some BS about how love is "magical" and that we can't really understand any of the biological mechanisms behind human sexual behavior, and that discussing these mechanisms (e.g. pheromones) would be "weird," which is funnily enough something someone here once leveled at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 07:49 PM
2

its very common to use personal attacks to discredit the person making the argument, and thus appear to discredit the argument indirectly. the people making these arguments tend to be people so set in their thinking that the only way they can perceive someone else thinking differently is not through their own logic and rational examination, but through some personal defect that poisons their mind to ideas they consider "lesser" then, instead of debating the original idea, the discussion just deg…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/16 11:22 PM
1

Plenty of careers were barred to women, and others were barred specifically to married women because once married they were forced to stay home and could not have financial independence. They also could not get credit cards if they were not married. women were given shit if they kept working after being married So why not change the culture that promotes these things instead of being against marriage in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 12:27 AM
1

how does marriage prevent you from being able to wear what you want and have control of your sex life?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 12:02 AM
1

That being said, if they are drugged and porned it might not be as bad. Well I've got some good news for you then, friend
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/16 11:45 PM
2

Overpopulation? Where? You mean China? No, I mean worldwide. I'm aware that European (and European-American) birthrates are down, but for the purposes of my comment, I was only referring to the overall idea of overpopulation and its usage as propaganda to slowly push the idea of not having kids for a large segment of the West (I used the bracket from the 20%-90% of households).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 06:41 PM
2

Its funny that all this propaganda and some legit ideas like overpopulation is are causing the average middle class person (someone in the 20%-90% for this argument) to not want to have kids and have families, meanwhile the very top echelon of society continues to have children and families to spread their own wealth (e.g. the Trumps). Its a hell of a way to stop overpopulation - elites with their high levels of wealth are incentivized to have children and families, while the middle classes are …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:43 PM
1

Do you think that is the exception or the rule
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:13 PM
1

She actually has good stances on vaccines and wifi if you actually consider what she is saying as opposed to reading the Washington Post. However, I don't like the stance on nuclear.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 09:36 PM
2

For anyone interested, the book The Power Elite by Mills goes into detail on different classes in America and their origins, though it was written in the 50s, but things are mostly the same today.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 09:34 PM
1

Is it actually seriously believed in America that the Clintons actually murdered their opponents? I haven't looked into the specific claims, but realize that people are vying for the most powerful position of the most powerful country in the history of the world. People get killed over the smallest shit like a bag of weed or coke. I don't understand the belief that no one would do unscrupulous actions over huge shit, like being in control of the most powerful nation (ever).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 09:31 PM
2

Hard to say. Not for the avg woman, but there are arguments for (and probably against) the avg feminist but ultimately I have not read xojane enough to make either argument myself. That is also granting the premise that the average feminist matters even if they don't have influence/prominence via academic or media institutions (even as lowly as a blog). What does it matter that my feminist neighbor has amazing ideas if s/he doesn't have any mouthpiece to discuss them with others?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 09:48 PM
2

Why are men reading xojane? As Atlas would put it, that shit isn't meant for you. Don't look to a silly click bait blog for real world advice. while this is true, it is incredibly helpful to understand an ideology if you read what an ideologue is saying to their fellow group.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 09:29 PM
2

I think Zizek actually has a similar opinion about this, if you are wondering the political affiliation of this man who is ripping apart Political Correctness here, he is a legit Marxist. some people on /r/socialism got really salty that he did that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 04:28 PM
2

no, it is actually. it is a semi popular line of "rebuttal" for people that continue to comment from points of view the blue pill doesn't like (rarely have I seen rpers use this). and in fact it was really interesting how you just doubled down and didn't even want to admit that there could have been times that line of attack was actually not warranted but instead will continue to defend a definitely not "personal attack" used against people that 95% of the time don't actually "need help." It is …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 04:17 PM
0

i have a chip on my shoulder because i'm criticizing your rhetoric? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 09:59 PM
0

Yeah /u/poppyblu was "arguing" quite disingenuously. Personally I recommend you RES label the bloopers (and the less frequent rpers) that don't actually want a good-faith discussion but do want to snidely insult you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 09:29 PM
5

incel threads are fine. all you have to do is, literally, refrain from including yourself in the discussion and instead find a different thread to insert yourself into.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 09:09 PM
3

the problem is that the discussion always inevitably ends up being this or some other kind of pity party you could always just do the popular blue pill quasi-personal-attack route and tell them to "get help" and "get therapy" to counter balance this supposed pity party. Those types of comments have already made at least 1 confirmed person leave this sub (xemnas), which is really sad that the so called "benevolent" rhetoric of the blue pill types is actually vicious enough to drive a user from th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 09:07 PM
1

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/07/democrats-need-to-stop-insisting-that-everything-is-going-well
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/16 05:08 PM
2

I don't think that is true for the majority of "nice guys," but I do think that is a popular claim to make of them, as it is very marginalizing to their opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/16 11:09 PM
1

Oh ok. I think the confusion was that the previous comment was a little unclear, so I thought you always thought marriage was dated and rotten. I think your idea was that only within the current and last few decades did marriage as an institution, begin to crumble. Is that correct? But I do agree with this comment basically
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 08:13 PM
5

how do you reconcile this comment with this: Don't know if you're much of a reader but "Brave New World" is such an amazing book, family and traditional relationships are nonexistent and literally everyone is interchangeable, the only interaction men and women have is to fuck each other and things like attachment and monogamy are completely alien in Brave New World. It seems more and more like we're getting closer to that dystopian world if we're not already living in it. you seem skeptical towa…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:16 AM
10

You can't claim it's for intelligent adults when there's a sizable crossover among 8 year olds. Eight year olds also like to read, so therefore reading is also "little kid culture."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:14 AM
5

Not to be fake-deep, but our generation has fallen into the capitalist trap of defining ourselves by the things we consume, and our relationships suffer as a result. Don't let anyone tell you that criticism of our economic system and the things capitalists push (e.g. advertising) is "fake-deep."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:09 AM
2

https://newint.org/columns/essays/2016/04/01/psycho-spiritual-crisis/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:08 AM
7

Whats the gender ratio at your university? If it skewed toward men, then there is going to be more competition for the fewer women, especially the cuter ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:07 AM
3

I can't wait until you're old enough (Edit: and, hopefully, wise enough) why are you being an asshole?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 11:56 PM
2

incels btfo
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 11:19 PM
3

Do you think the college engineering team or the football team is more likely to favor monogamy? If you're Brad Pitt, it would directly benefit you more if you have polygamy (seen countless times in history with court concubines). If you're Bill Gates, polygamy is not going to help you out as much (except for maybe tech fangirls).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 12:09 AM
1

at /r/seduction (or other places to read the literature) they make the distinction between outer game (confident actions, charisma, etc.) and inner game (building your self up, self-confidence, fitness, learning/practice, etc.). If you just work on the "outer game" then yes, he will forget to act in a dominant way. However, with inner game that shouldn't happen nearly as much, if at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/16 02:57 AM
1

fucking disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 03:23 AM
2

but then I can't study the intricacies of molecular biology, and unfortunately this isn't the 1800s where a biology laboratory in my house would actually be legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/16 03:16 AM
1

I'd surmise the elites have been discussing ways to reduce population growth in their own countries for a while now, at least since the 50s-60s where controlled population growth was beginning to appear unsustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 11:06 PM
1

whose alt account is OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 11:00 PM
2

i find it incredibly ironic he was the one to post the "How many of you still come here for the debate?" thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 12:11 AM
1

Why do you insist on strawmanning me as some sperg? thats what happens around here when some bpers get into arguments with people who don't share their views. If you stray from their accepted opinion, you begin to be called "weird," "abnormal," etc. in fact we had an old poster (xenmas) who would post things here but every time be told he was weird, deficient, needed therapy, etc. and it caused him to leave the subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 12:04 AM
3

It's always like "all women have daddy issues" no its not
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/16 04:14 PM
3

I stopped giving "full effort" comments when the other person makes personal attacks repeatedly, sometimes assuming you are in certain group (e.g. claiming I'm red pill just because I'm arguing against a blue pill) then insulting the group to insult me. Additionally, there's been a number of threads and comments where I see you, basically, be on the opposite side of the coin of your argument. Also, for every annoying red piller there seems to be 5 annoying blue pillers, and while I have disagree…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 02:59 AM
2

expect action to be taken. Already has been, at least in a little part. Your post is one of the reasons why I think Obamacare included that little parcel about it being cut off after the dependent turns 26. This way the dependent is now forced to work to get reliable health insurance.
/r/MGTOW08/09/16 02:56 AM
2

Why do you think feminists don't care about that? The impression is that the important opinion makers, influential people, and leaders of feminism aren't the ones shining a light on the issue. The conundrum is that, well my next-door neighbor feminist thinks its a problem (which is great!) but that means 0 in real world terms if s/he can't actually take any meaningful action within feminism for that problem. Think back to the Iraq War. There were many, many protestors against the war, but that d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 09:42 PM
1

His best arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/16 04:47 AM
1

I did that a long time ago
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/16 09:53 PM
3

"She claims feminism has been co-opted by commercialism" I don't know if I would agree with her book, but I certainly agree with that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/16 09:11 PM
6

Post 2001 WTF do you think you're signing up for? We've already been through multiple ME cluster fucks since then. I get the whole "Murica" beating of the chest after 2001. But since then? Even before then, like 1900s-1980s. You were fighting for an incredible amount of regime changes ordered by the ruling class. You went to South America, Korea, Vietnam, etc. to kill people that you have no real reason to be enemies with at all. It's a different argument for the officer class. He's probably ups…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 11:33 PM
5

Maybe one day the Waffle House line cook can work at Dorsia! (as dishwasher)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/16 11:01 PM
2

Not same guy, but I think it would be selfish of someone to refuse to do something that they've done in past, and enjoyed with others, to then not do with you. For a random, but tangentially related example, you can sometimes see this in other forums (e.g. bdsm community) where some of the women will enjoy being dommed by attractive, dominant men who are not their husbands and specifically say they don't want to do that with their husband because "they don't see him in that way." As you can see …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/16 11:55 PM
2

No, but she could be a FWB type situation
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 05:50 PM
5

When you get laughed at for simply saying "hi" to an attractive woman at a party, you might understand where other people are coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 04:04 PM
2

This is part of the answer, but I think it is also the lack of strong male role models. When the super high status people are having less sex because of entertainment, I'll believe you. But I think the increased entertainment is only mainly for those that had a hard time getting sex and relationships, as it would be something that takes a lot of hard work and resources to get if you are not moderately attractive to begin with. There's a reason why most of this entertainment started out with nerd…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 04:03 PM
1

Is Corbyn an actual socialist or is he another one of those "democratic socialists" that actually want welfare capitalism (i.e. not actual socialism)? I would hope they would vote for Corbyn, but I doubt that would be the majority opinion. Maybe a significant minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 03:50 PM
9

"Suck it up" is for people without the imagination to do something better with their lives. No, its for many working class and some middle class families that will never have the opportunity to do the things you have done. They have to stay happy working their menial jobs for stagnant wages, and even if they work hard are told they "have no imagination" from people like you. I would have thought a feminist would be more supportive of those of lower class status.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 03:17 PM
1

Owen Smith, who claims he is just as radical as Corbyn, but more capable of winning an election. Obviously, Corbyn supporters are not buying it, on either count. Sounds exactly like the Sanders-Clinton primary
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/16 08:20 PM
2

its the blooper way
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/16 06:47 PM
4

people that post on tbp seem way more "fixated" and "concerned" than anything thelonedinosaur has posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 10:32 PM
1

Give her a nice spank on the ass
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/16 02:42 AM
1

Why don't you read this as a primer and tell me what you think about it? It is quite short (just 17 pgs), but longer than reddit comments will have to offer you in terms of actually going into detail. http://www.davidmglewis.com/Evolutionary%20Psychology.pdf From his website: http://www.davidmglewis.com/research-publications.html
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/16 09:23 PM
1

What did Buss have to say about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/16 09:17 PM
32

Its about to get worse considering they (admins) are letting people do promotional self posts in return for receiving reddit benefits. See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/4upf11/new_ad_type_promoted_user_posts/
/r/MensRights06/08/16 04:37 PM
2

As history has shown time and time again, wall don't do shit. right wing Israelis would disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 06:35 PM
2

Not to do the thing where I make my anecdotal evidence the truth™, but I met my gf (then 19) when I was then 24 when we were both sitting in the front row of our History of China class.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 05:57 PM
1

Its funny you say that. I've actually gone to the movies more after I started dating my current woman than beforehand. She loves going to the theatre. I'm okay with it, I just prefer watching it after they come out on dvd in my own place
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 04:58 PM
1

but not as successful as it could have been without... You know what would have made it more successful? A better script. Better actors (Poehler, Fey, I like Wiig, change from Jones, etc.). A different marketing campaign that relied on selling the film (implying it deserves to be called "film" instead of "flick") instead of labeling critics as "thumbsucking baby men," but then again if it was actually a good movie that could stand on its own legs, they wouldn't have to stoop to use that kind of …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/16 04:47 PM
4

Sounds like something that someone with a cuck fetish would say
/r/seduction04/08/16 03:12 PM
3

EDIT: Judging from the responses, you guys are taking this post as a really desperate cry for help. Chill out fam, it's not that deep. I'm only half-past drunk yet. EDIT 2: Seriously y'all, this isn't about me. I take what I can get and I'm not too worried about it. It's just a discussion. Many times some of the blue pillers here will read something that disagrees with their opinion and call you autistic, aspergers, you need therapy, you're weird, etc. Its what happened to xemnas81, and it made …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 05:13 PM
2

Definitely tell him. Usually (besides the uncommon cases where the parter is fine with it), flirty behavior that wouldn't happen in-front of the other person but is happening now is a red-flag. Keep in mind if you tell your friend, when he goes to talk with Mary, she will downplay everything and make it seem like you were exaggerating. So this has a chance of becoming more trouble. However, if your friend is anything like me, I would want to know things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 05:07 PM
1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 05:37 PM
1

OP's having a slow Saturday
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/16 05:25 PM
1

Relative status
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/16 10:54 PM
2

Wow I actually agree with most of this comment
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:31 PM
1

If you use hyperbole like "magic pussy," then you don't actually need an argument. The ridiculousness of the hyperbole is the argument, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:29 PM
3

I guess George Orwell believes in the "magic pussy" theory too! From Down and Out in Paris and London, Ch. 36: The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating. Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as el…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/16 04:26 PM
1

Isn't there a difference between being emotionally invested in someone else's relationship ("caring about shit") and pointing out your opinion on their relationship ("degeneracy")?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/16 07:35 PM
0

They're probably attracted to you but are worried that you will break up their friend group if something bad happens. If you use the camp site rule (leave them better than you found them) you could probably work your magic on the whole group and maximize everyone's happiness.
/r/seduction23/07/16 11:40 PM
1

Good post and is similar to my own situation
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 02:41 AM
3

prog rock... is garbage fuck you
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 02:15 AM
1

I think more people should engage with science, read academic papers, and draw their own conclusions. Which is in itself the core of what science is about; its an open debate rather than a rigid library of facts. Yup, I agree. Which is why I question the questioning of evolutionary psychology on the grounds that it isn't testable due to my reading of basically any of David Buss' works. His hypotheses all seem to be testable, at least the ones I've read in his textbook on evo psych.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 12:42 AM
1

I can't speak for how people use it in PPD, but if you really think that (and are open to your view being changed) you should speak to a professor of evo psych at your local university.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 06:11 PM
2

People can be really rude here sometimes. Like when Xemnas posted legit arguments they would be ignored and instead he would be told "go to therapy" or that he was "weird" mostly from blue pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/16 05:51 PM
2

I love this post. Where can I buy your t-shirts
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/16 06:03 PM
2

Women don't have consistent rules they apply to everyone. Why isn't your flair purple yet
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 09:01 PM
1

However you seem to be under the impression that women look at sex and relationships solely as a market place ideal. No, you fundamentally are just not understanding what I am writing. Applying an economic lens to a situation is NOT saying everything (or even anything) in the situation involves money or a conscious economic decision. A 10 year old choosing to watch TV over playing homework is an economical decision of spending her time. There is NO money involved and the child is not consciously…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:45 PM
1

So basically the problem here is you wish to purchase something that's unavailable. You think I wish to purchase sex (or what else did you mean by something unavailable)? Honey, some of us are good looking and charismatic enough such that we don't need money to get sex or relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:28 PM
1

Except no one does that. No one does what? Make choices of who to spend their time, energy, and resources? No one does that? Hmm, okay! Half the time you lot seem to talk about women as beings bereft of any value except vaginas and so boil sex down to penis in vagina and male pleasure rather than anything else. ?? Who is my "lot" and why do you assume I am this "lot" because we have different opinions on the application of economics to human behavior? I prefer my dates to have some sort of emoti…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 05:01 PM
1

No, and that is as asinine a question as if I were to ask you "so you see all relationships as innocently as a 14-year old girl?" I'm not a robot because I see economic applications on human sexual choices. Also, you said before "sex isn't capitalism." You do realize economics doesn't inherently equal capitalism, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 04:15 PM
1

It's very foolish to equate freedom of personal choice to "an economic system". It is more foolish to think economics doesn't apply to human behavior, when economics is fundamentally about choices being made. Just because it offends your personal sensibilities doesn't make it "very foolish."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/16 12:52 PM
3

To be extremely charitable, I think you're just motivated by anti-religious bigotry. To be less charitable, you're a bunch of anti-semites and islamophobes. Lol, we're "motivated by bigotry" at best and "antisemitism/islamophobia" at worst solely because we don't like the practice of circumcision either in secular or religious contexts?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 09:28 PM
1

When incel goes wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 05:03 PM
1

the only thing worse than an incel is someone that makes a new account to troll an internet forum
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 06:01 PM
2

Make private forum if you don't want anyone to "butt in." As our good friend Five_decades has indicated, some ppl on ppd are not worth any effort
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 05:37 PM
1

You're in the wrong sub if you can't back up your own views when challenged. Typically there are three types of "debates" on reddit & ppd: both parties are polite and voice disagreements without petty insults (rare) 1 or both parties engage the arguments but snidely insult their opposition 1 or both parties do not engage in "good faith" and play semantic games to ignore points all the while belittling their opponent Only 1 of these situations is actually worth wasting the day commenting back and…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 05:20 PM
1

Here's something you might not realize: correlation does not imply causation. Do you think an ethics board is going to approve an experiment that would causally show pre-martial sex lessens pair-bonding for people down the road? The experiment would call for forcing people to have sex to see what happens in the brain. So while "correlation =/= causation" is a good talking point for most subjects, some subjects will not be able to be tested for causality, so you have to fall back to correlation. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 05:09 PM
3

Where they get it wrong is you don't have to look like some swole jock to get women. No, but I bet if you took the average guy and gave him a few less percentages of body fat and a few more pounds of muscle, he would have, on average, greater success with women than he did before.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 05:02 PM
1

You can take this to a macro level, why are certain groups such as White people fair game for hateful identity politics, even though White people represent domesticated, docile Betas? It's precisely because they are domesticated and docile they are treated this way. People hate bland, perfect pride but love the ups and downs of chaotic, colourful characters. And if you dare to refute their narrative they just paint you as "racist," "misogynist," etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 04:53 PM
5

Well you are posting on a forum that is dedicated to the very idea of debating the things like PUA books, so be prepared to back up your comments if they are seen by others as not accurately portraying the ideas within said books.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 02:16 AM
3

You're either bad at making conclusions from statements or you are deliberately skewing what i said. Read his posts repeatedly and you will find a pattern of this
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 01:59 AM
2

James Flanigan, business columnist: Roosevelt saved capitalism and the principles of privately owned business for the U.S. economy. Flanigan also quotes historian WE Leuchtenberg: [FDR's ideology] "rested on the assumption that a just society could be secured by imposing a welfare state on a capitalist foundation" - W. E. Leuchtenberg sometimes the left makes up bullshit, like calling Trump a fascist, and sometimes the right makes up bullshit, like calling welfare capitalists "socialists" or "co…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 03:23 PM
1

he was a welfare capitalist
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 04:43 AM
1

I'm not religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 01:49 AM
2

Safe space where people can debate anything without insults - good. Safe space where only certain ideologies/ideas (e.g. the latest leftist ideas) are allowed - bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 04:34 PM
2

Any unhappy outcome is a conspiracy. Yes biology, psychology, and their applications to human relationships are a conspiracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 04:21 PM
0

I don't want this to come across offensive, but you're looking at this whole situation from the outside in. You're seeing this from a distance, and you're angry about it. Your bitterness is clouding your perception. And, like clockwork, the blue piller on ppd gets personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 06:04 PM
4

if they're spending hours at a time posting and complaining on reddit, they're likely not doing much else. You mean like everyone on /r/purplepilldebate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 06:01 PM
2

As someone who has been on the receiving end of RP men freaking the fuck out You mistake replies to your frequently derisive posts as "freaking out."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 03:03 AM
1

That's kind of like asking why the BlackLivesMatter people aren't trying to cure cancer. No, it would be like asking why BLM doesn't seem to want to change certain aspects of black culture that might also help them (e.g. glorification of drugs and violence), but BLM doesn't want to change black people, they want to change white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 06:23 PM
1

America doesn't benefit from TPP or NAFTA. Oh we do benefit my friend, it is just the people benefiting are not the common person.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 12:16 AM
7

LOL Yeah it seems like you wanted to do nothing more than post "you virgins like nasty things."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:50 PM
2

they're either looking for a free ride, or that love that Daddy never showed Wow that dichotomy would make theredpill proud.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 07:40 PM
0

Maybe don't wear your feelings on your sleeve then if some stranger on the internet can get to you. I guess I believe in the crazy notion that, while on a discussion forum, one should stick to arguments and not get personal with silly, petty things like "I wouldn't date you." You do realize I'm not even the person you were replying to, right? TRPs Of course, everyone that disagrees with you must be trp! calls them out on their BS. The biggest bs here is all the sublte digs you like to use then f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 04:12 PM
1

However, you really shouldn't take things so personally. You're literally saying people that have different opinions than you are insecure, small ego, etc. On some level you know this and possibly even enjoy saying those subtle digs. "I wouldn't want to date you." -> There is no logical reason to include this in a discussion/environment where he is clearly not going to ask you out. Its just another (not-so) subtle insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 02:05 PM
1

This post could use some moderation
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/16 01:47 AM
5

Husbands/SOs/Boyfriends/Flings who get "exciting sex" are "exciting Husbands/SOs/Boyfriends/Flings" who know how to elicit raw sexual lust in their partners. Yup, which is why any man that wants to have a semblance of a decent relationship needs to learn how to do this, if he doesn't already.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 09:00 PM
1

So do you think that is the norm
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/16 12:02 AM
3

I would love to respond more thoroughly in a little bit when I have time to read your source, it looks interesting. David Buss is a great researcher for these topics. He also doesn't state that gender roles are 100% biological either, but that biology/evolution does play a large role in how each gender acts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 01:17 AM
4

Those are very interesting points, though I wonder on how many of those things are changes to gender roles by definition; for example, point 3 isn't purely related to gender roles, and seems to be a cultural tactic regarding sex. Point 1 seems to imply that a male gender role is to rape women. What do you think of this: Nor are these female preferences restricted to America, to Western societies, or to cap- italist countries. A large cross-cultural study was conducted of thirty-seven cultures on…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 12:59 AM
1

I've had women pay for dates and try to ask me out. So have I, but that doesn't mean it is the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 09:15 PM
1

I don't want to comment one way or another if they are sexist, but I will say that "they're sexists and haters of women" is what a lot of people also say about pua/seduction.
/r/seduction28/04/16 12:30 AM
2

Growing up I was very skeptical of traditional values, and I don't accept many of them today, but I must say that I don't particularly enjoy what seems to be contemporary liberal values either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 12:14 AM
1

Yes, if I have evidence that she is skilled in an area that I'm not (e.g. law, as she is going to law school later), then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 07:31 AM
2

I'm not a rper, but I think it is important that my gf submits when she thinks I have the expertise for a particular decision (i.e, she is confident in my ability), yet has the confidence to disagree with me when she feels she has enough skill/intellect/knowledge to make a better choice in an area I'm less familiar with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:14 PM
3

I don't think any rper believes that a human population needs or should be 100% alpha men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 06:35 PM
2

I thought most feminists didn't believe in the a/b dichotomy, or this evolutionary biology argument Do you actually have these rp views or are you just using this CMV to try to make rpers feel bad by dangling "lesser human" in front of their face?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 06:27 PM
1

to appeal to nerds who then perceive it as a literal game they can win or hack. A good outcome could be considered a "win," no?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 07:00 PM
3

Nice misrepresentation from the authors (of the meta review) there. Example: Either way, these data pose a major challenge to the idea that women routinely ‘shop around’ for good genes by engaging in EPCs to obtain genetic benefits for their children [14]. This is the article that is cited for the "14" citation, and if you actually read the article, no where does it even imply that women "routinely" do EPP (extra-pair paternity). This article most agrees with the OP's article in that human "extr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 09:06 PM
1

You showed her though she really knows you mean business now. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 04:35 AM
2

I don't think I'm misogynist and I can see where some mras are coming from. I mean, most men (including mras) are in agreement about fundamental feminist concepts like women's right to vote and own property. It is less agreed upon concepts coming from the 2nd, but mostly 3rd, waves of feminism that get the most pushback from mras. E.g. Duluth model, opposition to shared custody, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:34 AM
1

This reminds me of a scenario from one of my previous jobs: I find a coworker attractive, so I ask her to go kayaking with me. She later says she is going to bring a friend, which was fine. However, on the day of, both girls flake (classic and kind of expected), which was still fine, but they didn't even call or text (not fine). Two-three months later our boss was going around collecting donations for her medical bills or something. I didn't have cash, only card, so I couldn't donate, but I high…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 12:31 AM
1

I find it kind of strange that so many men feel so incredibly threatened by feminism. Some men think that some feminist policies are misguided or just wrong. Most men don't have a problem with women voting or owning property (fundamental feminist concepts).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 11:35 PM
2

Some of Gatto's other works are much shorter. I've only read this one book though so I can't comment on the quality of the other books.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 10:11 PM
3

wow yes It's kind of like they wanna make school as boring as possible for some reason http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/ughoae.pdf ^ Underground History of American Education Its a long read, but in a very small nutshell, there are many vested interests that would prefer our education system spit out obedient citizens that are just educated enough to pull levers but not educated enough to learn how to combat the system itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 10:03 PM
4

the fact that our living experiences arent really quantifiable and predictable. That is in no way a statement that could have overwhelming consensus, even if you excluded the opinion of every rper in existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 04:50 PM
2

and now you see why, despite disagreeing with rpers, bpers are usually incredibly more annoying than the former group
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 06:03 PM
1

Dozens of universities, even esteemed ones, are putting millions of dollars into "pseduoscience?" Very laughable. It disagrees with your own ideology so you desperately want it to be on the same plane as phrenology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 03:56 AM
3

evo pysch has serious issues and isn't a real science I disagree. Researchers constantly develop testable EP hypotheses. That is to also say I don't believe evo psych is infallible, but I usually don't find the criticism of EP to be very compelling. There's a reason it's journals are open access. Open access isn't inherently bad, and you also say that as if there are only cons with open access with nothing beneficial about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 08:07 PM
2

I use my universities' library search for specific papers. If it is just general information, I use David Buss' textbook Evolutionary Psychology The New Science of the Mind. There are free pdfs floating around out there so you don't have to pay for it if you don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 07:47 PM
2

Usually EP acknowledges both genetics/evolution and culture. Edit: Just to add more --> The point of EP is to uncover neural mechanisms, or behaviors, that have evolved over time that overall increase the fitness of the population being studied. Many of these behaviors are consistent regardless of culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 07:38 PM
4

What posts? You haven't posted anything here in at least 14 days, besides this. Did you forget to switch accounts?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:06 PM
3

This ignores the human capability for abstract thought. The baboon probably cannot think to themselves "wow that social interaction went poorly, how could I come out on top next time?" instead, they preform the behaviors that prevent them from being socially and physically harmed (i.e., don't piss off the top male, and if you do use submissive body language to yield authority). However, a human can easily think abstract thoughts about their own positions in a social hierarchy, their social skill…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 11:00 PM
2

Mao was personally capitalistic how so? capitalistic power How is leading an army capitalistic? He used military/state power, sure, but what do you mean by capitalistic power? force everyone No, not even close. Many wanted economic change from the feudal-esk system that ruled before the revolution; the majority of the population was composed of peasants (very poor, poor, middle, and rich). Guess who the feudal system mostly fucked? they were forced to do what he wanted or die. This occurs in eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 07:03 AM
2

Do you not agree that you can at least see how these things lead into one another? Well I don't know that they "lead" per say, but I would agree that if we made a Venn diagram with the ideas of rp and capitalism, there would be significant overlap. On a side note I'm a fan of your informative and non partial posts. I always learn something from them and you keep condescension out of your posts which many find hard not to do here. Thanks. I try to keep an open mind for any and all ideas. Meh, I'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 06:49 AM
7

I don't know about that. I could believe in maximizing my own welfare in terms of romantic relationships, but that is a different topic entirely than economic politics. In very basic terms, I don't see how acting like a man also makes one a capitalist. E.g., Mao ZeDong led a peasant revolution against the feudal-esk Chinese system to establish communism. He was a political and military leader, and he also used his power to achieve sexual success (imperial concubines). I think there is a link bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:02 PM
8

Looks like someone doesn't want to post with their real account
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:22 PM
4

Indeed, the hardest part of this discussion is finding the line between socialization and biological determinism of mate preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 01:54 AM
4

There is plasticity in the human mating, but there also seem to be hard coded preferences shared by the average man and woman, respectively. For example (slight wall of text, but don't feel like brevity): Nor are these female preferences restricted to America, to Western societies, or to cap- italist countries. A large cross-cultural study was conducted of thirty-seven cultures on six continents and five islands using popUlations ranging from coast-dwelling Australians to urban Brazilians to sha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 01:20 AM
6

Amateur biological determinism is nothing but dehumanization Idk, as someone studying biology, evolution, and genetics it is not dehumanization but explaining reality... People studying primate mating is totally fine, but studying human mating becomes weird to some people (not that you are saying this, but I've sometimes seen this in other threads/places).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:21 AM
-1

The irony coming from this account is staggering
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 03:01 AM
2

No, there is definitely a "middle of the road" when some bpers don't think evolutionary psychology is even 1% correct on things. Researcher David Buss isn't "red pill" but he comes to many conclusions that are still controversial for bpers to accept in this sub. When some people on your side claim Buss is wrong about everything, it is time to evaluate your shoddy "golden mean fallacy" claim. And before you start your tired "red pill is evil" spiels, you can save it, as I'm not even red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 08:17 PM
2

there's no need to misrepresent There is no misrepresentation. TBP sub is a meta-echochamber sub so people can make strawmen arguments and congratulate themselves on how amazingly they tore it down. It is exactly like the "r/enoughlibertarianspam" subs or circlebroke. And if you say that they got the argument wrong they say "oh look mad terper." I'm not even redpill but anyone in the middle can clearly see it is a childish sub, just like other subs that are solely designed to make fun of a parti…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:46 PM
1

Criticisms of Buller: http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/evolutionary-psychology-is-here-to-stay/ http://www.cep.ucsb.edu/buller.htm (This one has 7 links to evo psychologists critiquing the critique) Here is a recent (2014) response to Buller's critique of sexual selection: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848614000417 From above: Highlights •Some of Buller's alternative hypotheses run afoul of empirical evidence. •It is argued that Buller misrepresents some of the hypothe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 10:06 PM
1

You mean individuals in the military? Why are you calling them warriors? By definition they are warriors. This discussion is not going anywhere as you seem to be treating "aggressive" as if it means "berserk." One can be aggressive without being out of control. For example, this statement where you say aggressive soldiers "refuse to listen to orders and they'd be running off to start fights and kill" shows you are applying the definition of "berserk" to "aggressive." One deifinition of aggressiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:40 PM
2

Humans don't have warrior castes. People can slip in and out of those roles. Okay, you don't like the word "caste," use military instead then. Our military can't be passive, but if they were as aggressive as aggressive gets, they'd be starting wars all the time and trying to take over the world (something like ISIS). I'm talking individuals within a societies' group of warriors (since your OP was about individuals), not the strategy of the overall group. Are you saying individual warriors should…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 04:04 AM
3

Should the warrior caste of the average human group (tribe, nation state, country, etc.) be non-aggressive?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 02:28 AM
6

Rpers don't want to admit it but it is probably similar for guys as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:55 PM
2

What is the point of more blue pill participation if they just post whiney screeds about evil red pillers and admit that they didn't even comment for "discussion and debate" and then replies to anyone who responds that it looks like he "hurt your feelings." Do you really want more people like that "debating" here cuddle?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:52 PM
3

And yet many BPers say the same about RPers. Idk, as someone who disagrees with both types (bp and rp) it seems to me bp uses snark and thinly-veiled insults much more often than rp.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:47 PM
2

I don't want people like you stalking my post history obvs I don't think anyone believes you are worth stalking, let alone myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:41 PM
4

I haven't had any red pillers insinuate I'm stalking them because I disagree with their claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:31 PM
4

You don't read good, do you mate? Typical blooper insulting someone who disagrees with them. Why don't you post here on your main account? Is it because you are actually banned on your main? Hint: they're not actually misogynists Or maybe mra are considered "misogynists" because they don't use the feminist lens to critique mens issues and have no problem with detailing the role that women play in these issues as well. It is the exact same "logic" behind the often touted phrase: "if you're not a …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:31 PM
13

r/menslib has accomplished more What have they accomplished? They are accepted because they also share feminism as an ideology, thus they take mens problems through an ideological and argumentative lens originally created by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 01:57 AM
1

Try actually engaging some. You've already established that you think people who disagree with your opinions aren't well read. Enough said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:57 AM
1

You do realize I'm not op right? Just because I said this doesn't adequately address the OP, doesn't mean I think OP is correct. Go try to find your pointless debate elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:18 AM
1

Also, if you think that recreational sex has more to do with the collapse of a culture, then wild spending on foreign wars and a lack of investment in community and infrastructure... You need to read more books. ? If you think that that claiming a rebuttal isn't up to snuff is the same as believing the idea that is getting the rebuttal, then you need to improve your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:57 PM
0

How does that counter the OP? It could be that while female chastity is a virtue in the Arab world, the Arab elites have enough power to have harems of dozens of women. The village beauties go off to the king's palace while the village sons and more homely daughters stay for menial work. Who wouldn't be pissed off at that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 10:48 PM
3

I always thought it was funny when older people claim their politcal opinions are correct solely due to their advanced age.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 11:58 PM
4

"Men are the dominate gender"as a premise doesn't make regular academia outside feminism "masculine studies."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 11:41 PM
6

Hmm. Not sure if you are trying to sneakily make a dig at me or just dodge the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 07:35 AM
15

Question: Do feminists acknowledge the amount of social power a woman has? A mere accusation of rape could lead to a "bastard" (why is he automatically a bastard in your view again?) getting shot. How many black men have been killed due to white women accusing them of sexual assault (that the white men took as absolute gospel)?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 06:04 AM
4

I'm only talking about the ones that do harass. Unfortunately the ones that do harass are not going to care about what you or I say about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 05:44 AM
4

Fun, intimacy, human connection, love, sex, relationships. I have those and am currently in a great relationship. Yet, I would still care if my current partner had what I thought of as a high partner count. I don't get why you post here if you think people that have different opinions are just "insecure," "jealous," and have "rage." I guess it feels good to say false (some might even call this "rude" considering this sub is for discussion) things about other people that don't share your same opi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 03:08 AM
7

When everyone you know is super religious you're under a microscope 24/7. A secular person can also be against an ltr or marrying someone with a high partner count. Some studies show an increased chance of divorce for high partner counts. This same person also doesn't have to "look at you through a microscope." Reasonable people really don't care about how many people you sleep with unless they date you, or someone they know dates you and wants to take it further. Then they might advise against …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 03:03 AM
2

You guys prefer racism than respect. I don't think not banning "hate speech" is "prefering racism." I'm not even red pill, nor have I voted for any republican...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:48 PM
2

And you still didn’t answer my question. It is a bit of a leading question
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 09:45 PM
0

Seems that this thread is causing some cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 07:38 PM
2

For me its a "treat all guns as loaded" type statement as well as a base level of behavior to filter against. If all women are like that, how does the one in front of me stack up to it? If it turns out she way better than AWALT, winner. This is basically me right now and it is proving to be a very good metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:45 PM
3

He has claimed that men's minds don't function properly when confronted with an attractive woman. This wasn't a joke, he described the actual biological process he believes occurs in the male brain that causes them to become confused and disoriented. If William Farrell is your idea of a moderate, no wonder you're not as bothered by extremists on that side. How does that claim make him an extremist? http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-interacting-with-woman-leave-man-cognitively-impaire…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 06:13 PM
1

Anything by David Buss is generally on point with numerous studies to back up his theses.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 09:18 PM
5

they give praise because it results in a happier workforce and that has tangible benefits. This isn't mutually exclusive with millennials needing a different management style. I've Managing Human Resources from the Millennial Generation by Sauser & Sims and they've written the same thing. It isn't a bad thing, we've just been raised differently than other generations (on average). And I say this as a millennial.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 09:15 PM
1

but materialism? Yeah, you might like this documentary Century of the Self. Upon review it looks like some links have been deleted but you might be able to find it elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 09:51 PM
1

I'm not even a libertarian, but your "observation" is basically a weak man fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:36 PM
4

everyone because of jealousy. Its more that the rich have always had a huge impact on how our country is ran. Some people want to change that. It would be a disservice to simply say they are "jealous" of their BMWs or whatever. Orwell wrote about this topic, among other things, and didn't like how most Western governments were ruled by capitalists that didn't seem to care about the working class (Down in Out in Paris and London, Road to Wigan Pier). Before that, Tocqueville was saying similar th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:32 PM
4

Why does TRP try to hammer TRP notions onto evolutionary, genetic, and biological models that don't even work for their traits? Read some David Buss. While not everything could be applied to rp, a large amount of his studies and work could definitely support some of the things rpers say. And before you even try to suggest otherwise, Buss also acknowledges some things are due to culture as well as our evolutionary past. The guy trying to argue feminism is genetic and should be bred out (or whatev…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 01:05 AM
3

here is no evidence/reason to believe sleeping around lowers your value for a long term relationship Please see this, and this isn't even the same studies that rpers bring up for this discussion. Contemporary studies show that the best predictor of extramarital sex is premarital sexual permissiveness-people who have many sexual partners before marriage are more likely to be unfaithful than those who have few sexual partners before marriage (Thompson, 1983; Weiss & Slosnerick, 1981). I'm of the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 04:35 AM
5

spend less time looking at gonewild and maybe you have more time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:55 PM
1

I think you should also ask if: a) If both parties want the same things (e.g. do they FWBs, a relationship, marriage, etc.) b) Is the extent of both parties struggles the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 05:46 AM
4

it's absolutely a facet of communism. Wasn't basic income advocated by Friedman?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 12:41 AM
2

Contemporary studies show that the best predictor of extramarital sex is premarital sexual permissiveness-people who have many sexual partners before marriage are more likely to be unfaithful than those who have few sexual partners before marriage (Thompson, 1983; Weiss & Slosnerick, 1981). If you want to roll the dice and marry a woman with 100 partners, then please be my guest. But using available data to see (on average) the effect of high partner counts is not insecure, however you wish to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:42 PM
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 12:15 AM
-11

But partner count in itself isn't a quality. Okay well now its just semantics. The point was that we've deviated from discussing the woman's behavior to discussing the man's behavior. I don't think sleeping with a guy once every two months is somehow an indicator that there's very little chance she's a good LTR partner. I wouldn't say "very little chance" but I would agree that it does increase the probability of bad relationship behavior. For example, from an evo psych textbook I've cited elsew…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 12:09 AM
2

The other threads on science the blues loved since it agreed with their beliefs/disagreed with reads. How about this science: From a man's reproductive perspective, a more important cue than virginity to paternity certainty is a reliable signal of future fidelity. If men cannot require that their mates be virgins, they can require of them sexual loyalty. A study of short- and long-term mating found that U.S. men view lack of sexual experience as desirable in a spouse (Buss & Schmitt, 1993). Furt…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 12:03 AM
-12

No I'm not flipping anything. Yes, you are. You are derailing by flipping the argument to the guy's qualities, e.g. (in)security, when the argument was about the woman's qualities, e.g. partner counts and likelihoods of leaving/cheating. I say "worrying about the many partners of a woman is a sign of insecurity. If you're confident, it doesn't have to be a problem". I say a man can be both confident in himself AND have a reason to be worried about high partner counts. It is a total derailment of…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 11:57 PM
8

The only "science" RPers accept as legitimate are OKCupid surveys. And when other studies come out in favor of their arguments, its "biotruths" or "soft science" or "evopsych BS." As someone whose cited studies for some of my own claims (sometimes which align with rp views, sometimes not), I also get pushback from bpers about my own studies. So, I could easily say that your side only accepts science when it confirms their own points of view as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 11:15 PM
-9

don't even want to consider a woman romantically anymore that had more than 3 partners. You're flipping this around on the guy when the argument is if very high (or high) partner counts influence a woman's likelihood of sticking around in an LTR or influence cheating behavior. It is a convenient retort but isn't an actual answer to the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 11:11 PM
18

Are those really the only two options? No, but its highlighting the fact that one side of the extreme still gets sexual success, but the other side does not. The middles of the spectrum can still have success though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 08:52 PM
2

we* have also successfully fought to contain the most inhumane of those instincts Westerners* have successfully "fought" to contain these instincts only because we were the dominant countries that happened to gain control of territory with rich resources, and when a population has easy resource availibility, it will become more docile, as their collective needs are met. Go to countries that are not as prosperous as more wealthy countries and you wouldn't be saying "we...successfully contained ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 04:07 AM
7

99,999 % of mammal species is not capable of driving cars. Why would anyone think homo sapiens is different? While we do have higher level reasoning and cognition, that doesn't mean this advanced cognition is always on, nor that more base instincts can't apply to different situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 04:01 AM
3

Reds might be more willing to change their minds if blues didn't call them stalkers, creeps, and knew why women didn't like them. Why even try to debate in good faith if the other person is going to act like a typical high school teenage girl? TBPers also view PPD as a red-dominated sub because they think anyone currently arguing against them must be red-pill. Its happened to me multiple times from different bpers despite having this flair, despite not agreeing with everything rpers say, and des…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 11:32 PM
1

It doesn't need to be a well reasoned argument since your beginning assertion was also not well reasoned, nor supported. It would be like responding to a youtube comment with an essay. It doesn't deserve that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 11:15 PM
1

You got me, can't find a flaw in this logic /s. The point was that bonobos, obviously, do not have pornography. Your original assertion is still asinine.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 05:49 AM
1

Behavior of animals should never be used as a guideline for human behavior. It wasn't being used as a guideline. It was a retort to your ridiculous notion that guys who like anal/oral are gay or porn addicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:40 PM
1

i can't tell if this was meant to be serious or not. submissive facial features? Lots of google hits, plus I have this from an evo psych (gasp) textbook: Facial Dominance: A dominant-looking face may be another signal of status. Facial dominance is indicated by qualities such as a prominent chin, heavy brow ridges, and a muscular face; low dominance is indicated by the opposite qualities: a weak chin, slight brow ridges, and a fleshy face. The evolutionary psychologists Ulrich Mueller and Allan …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:31 PM
1

Because it's easier to cry on the internet about how awful women are than it is to get a social life and go to the gym. Yes, that was Elliot Rodgers and other types like that. Other people actually take action and apply the things they read about social interaction to their own benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:51 AM
6

The problem isn't that socially awkward kids aren't picking up on this, it's that they're blaming other people. Dude I've been reading pua/red pill stuff for a while and while I don't always agree with it, it always puts the onus on the guy reading it to improve and that it is negative qualities about himself that drove him to read the material to later grow/improve. Maybe we've read different articles or authors or whatever, but assigning blame to others was definitely not a part of their rheto…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:49 AM
2

"Ready to conform to the authority or will of others (i.e. the gf/wife or other men); meekly obedient or passive." One could also define submissive in terms of facial features and/or body language. Men with these features and/or behavior also do worse at sexual competition than those with features/behavior that is dominant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:30 AM
4

most women are not at all attracted to submissive men. Agree or disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 08:53 PM
1

to justify your anxiety and jealousy towards women. I think it all comes down to fear and you guys are terrified of getting your feelings hurt. All this red pill shit is a cocoon to shield yourselves from getting hurt. I find it odd that analyzing the average woman's behavior and making claims about it somehow translates to having negative personality traits like jealousy. I get that you don't like rpers and that some of them are jealous and anxious, but trying to subscribe negative emotions to …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 12:51 AM
1

Riots and Political Protest is a book that goes into detail about why the authors think most recent political movements against modern power structures have failed and the puzzling question as to why there hasn't been any new leftist ideas about replacing the capitalist system. You might be able to get it for free if you have academic access, but I'm unsure of the price if you cannot get it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 12:23 AM
8

Why are we talking about what happens in other threads? Who cares? It is interesting behavior when you call out rpers over a circlejerk but don't do the same for bpers. The point wasn't that bpers circlejerk too, it was that I've never seen you criticize them for it (i.e. hypocrisy). Evo psych is still psychology, or science plus unreliable and typically biased projections. Having a science degree doesn't make you an infallible, objective robot. Your biases influence what you believe just like e…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:13 AM
7

who only populate one side of that debate and are jerking each other off in a circular fashion about how great their side is, yeah, I'm gonna call it a circle jerk. Really? So either you've never seen a circle jerk from your side, or you would just rather not call threads where people that share your opinions congregate a "circle jerk." Or maybe I've never seen you call a blue pill circlejerk before and I'm wrong, but I don't think you're the type to be as stringent to fellow ideologues than to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:20 AM
1

I don't want you to teach me anything, I just want points that other people have said that you think are incorrect because you think they don't know as much about the topic as they think they do. For an example, a common talking point against evolution is that a person "didn't come from a monkey."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:31 AM
1

What do people unfamiliar with the entire theory get wrong or miss?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 11:30 PM
10

I'm roughly in the middle, but what is there to be angry about? You confuse abrasive analyses of behavior with anger and hatred. Not to say there aren't angry men commenting sometimes, but to assume this of your ideological opponent because of differences in gender ideas is baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:44 PM
15

ITT: circle-jerkfest AKA most men are agreeing with the linked comment and think it was a great analysis of gender relations, however it contradicts what I think, therefore circlejerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:39 PM
1

Did you have a point or did you just want to brag about how well read you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:04 PM
0

I don't make a habit of...checking everything they say. Somehow, I'm not surprised. I was still explaining their view point and discussion points. Okay, then they were using a generalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 11:18 PM
0

They were using the context of your initial statement It wasn't my statement. You obviously don't realize I'm not the same person that started this sub-thread. No one is generalizing except for you, buddy. This is a negative generalization of a group: They're saying redpill would not help a female rape victim, let alone date one. Because redpill objectifies/loathes women and doesn't really care about how women feel. You used a generalization and you didn't even know it, and the other poster was …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 10:45 PM
1

No, the other person decided to change the argument from "dating" to "helping," and because they think rpers are the worst possible humans (even more vile than murderers, terrorists, etc.), s/he believes they would never help a victim. Blue pillers hate generalizations until they decide to use them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 10:04 PM
1

Did I write the title of this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 08:38 PM
8

Nothing! No one is required to date anyone, and mental illness is a big disqualifier for many people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 08:29 PM
1

I didn't say that a victim and a pedo were equal. I said they both have risks to dating them, which they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 08:25 PM
0

PTSD is a mental illness. Some victims get PTSD. Therefore, some rape victims are mentally ill. Generally, men would like to minimize risk in relationships to save resources. One risk factor is mental illness. Therefore, one should avoid dating rape victims. Pedophilia is a mental illness. Some pedos act on their illness. Generally, women would like to minimize risk in relationships to save resources (and their children). One risk factor is pedophilia. Therefore, one should avoid dating pedos. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 06:57 PM
2

to help a rape victim Dating someone is now "helping" them? No one in any thread said anything about "not helping" or "not comforting" rape victims. They did say they didn't want to date them. Big difference in word usage here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 06:50 PM
-3

to dating a rapist I just said that the theoretical pedo had control over his urges, therefore, in no way could he compared to a rapist. Do you understand that? It is a relatively easy thought to entertain. Your ideas are hypocritical. When men expressed aversion to dating a rape victim to minimize risk, you call them mongrels. However, now it is perfectly fine to have aversion to pedos since now you're the one minimizing risk. Continue to be disgusting mongrels amongst yourselves. Also, I've ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 06:43 PM
0

It's a fucking cop out. Exactly! So the men with pedo tendencies (he is in control of) should be just as good of a romantic partner as the female rape victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 06:14 PM
1

Another good post from wub. Unfortunate that the troll and baiting posts always get more replies than these. Cheers. Just to add something relevant, I was discussing this with my gf the other day, and she seemed to be amazed and perplexed when I said a guy had to be actively improving himself and doing other things to receive the love of a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:41 PM
2

But it is the context of an online forum that is for discussion about human relationships, not in an offline context.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:43 AM
1

I don't see how it is weird to say that in a context of describing behavior. It would be weird if I said to my girlfriend "I love the way your oxytocin makes me feel."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:15 PM
4

I don't know, but they probably aren't in the science fields. I've been accused of having a "weird way to look at relationships" because I said that one chief bonding mechanism between humans was due to biochemicals and pheromones. #BiologyStudentProblems
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:01 PM
1

What do you think of this Orwell passage where he basically says it is a need similar to hunger, with negative effects happening if the need is not met (Down and Out in Paris and London Ch. 36)? there is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 11:06 PM
3

thoughts on this OP In an ideal world, this would help protect men and women who have partners that abuse them and force them into unhealthy relationships. However in reality, I'm unsure how being "controlled" is going to be proved in a court of law and how this is going to be proven above a s/he said "I felt controlled" or something to that effect. Basically, I would wager there is going to be quite a few cases were this law is going to be used inappropriately. I also wonder if those in favor o…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 12:51 AM
5

I'll be leaving PPD soon. Good. The amount of times I've seen you insulted, ad-hommed, and slighted because of your logical reasoning is infuriating. You deserve better than this "debate" sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 11:58 PM
2

I'm not sure you know what a debate actually is The irony of this coming from a person with a comment "quality" such as yours is incredibly high.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 10:41 PM
5

he is simply answering a question. I would be more skeptical if he made his OWN post. So thats how you justify thinking all RP posts of their experiences are false, but are not at all skeptical about a post that aligns with your own beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 09:30 PM
2

Your comments were that guys like women with low partner counts. You are confusing me with another person. I have not said that in this thread. Our discussion was about pair bonding, as you seem to think it is some wildly bizarre phenomena that doesn't explain human relationships at all. The rest was about your strange way to analyze relationships. I'm saying human relationships follow biological determinism, and one component of this is pair bonding. Human relationships are not held together by…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 10:27 AM
1

It is unfortunate good science makes you feel uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 05:26 AM
2

Yes, but none of those studies claim to demonstrate that these averaged facts arise from the inherent, biological 'essence' of women. The textbook addresses that succinctly: The enormous body of empirical evidence across different methods, time periods, and cultures supports the hypothesis that women have evolved a powerful preference for long- term mates with the ability to provide resources. Because ancestral women faced the tremendous burdens of internal fertilization, a nine-month gestation,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 05:17 AM
3

I really don't think so, but if that makes you feel more confident about ignoring the substance of my comments, go ahead and think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 04:54 AM
3

Oh I see, because I have an analytical neuron pattern in my brain, I also must not be able to enjoy/be present in the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:50 AM
6

You can't speak of what 'all' human males or females want, or how they 'all' behave, the same way you can for simpler creatures Sure, no one can explain all phenomena for many fields, let alone biology. However, you can explain how, on average, animals (or men or women) like certain things. For example, how on average (but with some variability) women across the globe have a high preference for high financial resources as one long-term mating strategy: Male and female participants in the study r…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:49 AM
3

Well I do have a loving girlfriend who is attracted, attached, and has a good personality. Marriage is quite a bit too far into the future to think about, but we would make a good couple. Care to explain why you are implying the thought of a biochemical link to pair-bonding is going to negatively affect my relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:34 AM
5

I know, right? I don't agree with many redpill things, but then I read these "arguments" that don't even address the logic behind some of their claims, but instead just try to say some bullshit that would look good in front of a crowd. But they don't understand an internet forum isn't a crowd, and the content of arguments is actually being read and digested, as opposed to witty quips that are in place of an adequate rebuttal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:30 AM
4

But aren't those the exceptions to the rule? We say humans have 46 chromosomes (a completely accurate generalization for humans of normal phenotype), then make special cases for when there are instances of, say, Down Syndrome.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:27 AM
5

Evolutionists build sexual selection theories of animals. Why are women (who are also animals just as much as men) any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:26 AM
3

A relationship with a person is... at its core, a relationship with an organism that is still an animal in nature. Organisms that follow biochemical and genetic laws that, say, release bonding chemicals before, during, and after sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:22 AM
7

So basically I must be vetted in order to spread my ideas? That is preposterous. While, yes, going through say, academia, adds prestige and weight to a presenters' resume, a speaker's presentation of ideas should be graded on the content of the argument and the supporting evidence of that argument. Maybe you subscribe to the thought that only those ideological elites with PhDs or similar credentials should be followed, but that is authoritarian in nature, and while it does help weed the good fro…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:16 AM
1

Did I read that right? I don't think so, considering I took it completely different from you. The central point was weaving commitment, pair-bonding, and attraction to conclude that it is in a man's best interest to commit to a woman that is likely to be faithful; a woman's likelihood of remaining faithful (in OP's opinion) is a product of her personality (my inclusion), the ability to pair-bond, and her attraction for her mate. That really doesn't sound anything like "appraising livestock," and…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 11:13 PM
13

literally ANYONE can give a TEDx talk. Exactly! This means that I, or you could give a compelling talk about a topic you love to a receptive audience. What is my alternative? Writing up 500+ word comments on reddit that few people even read before responding? Trying to give a speech on a public square to people not even paying attention?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:53 PM
24

No, its just logical to not toss out 30k+ talks just because you don't like the content of some of them.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:46 PM
8

Some TEDx is good.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:26 PM
2

Were you not implying that? What were you implying then?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 11:16 PM
1

You posted a tantrum. A complete and utter shitpost of projection and sulks. If only you also posted this when other blues are being insulting and making shitposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 11:13 PM
5

If you are going to imply pedophilia, then that is nothing better than the people that don't want Muslims for fear of terrorism. It would be an interesting comparison to see the percentage of Christian pedophilia vs the percentage of Islamic terrorism though. Many churches have morally strong role models.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 11:07 PM
1

The christian condescension level is out of the charts
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:05 PM
5

it absolutely does say sexism doesn't exist Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 06:47 PM
10

Well, that's nothing more than a swipe at me, no? Welcome to /r/PurplePillDebate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 04:42 AM
0

evo psych Evo psych has many good points with support from scientific studies. While that doesn't mean that every claim that is based on evo psych is right, I'm going to guess that you give evo psych less respect than it actually deserves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 01:26 AM
3

You two are arguing two slightly different points. He was saying that advances in tech are not going to change human nature, and you seem to be saying that tech can change history. It reminds me of that theory that says humans have a range of maximums for their social circle (Dunbar's Number). Even if we have facebook, the internet, etc., this number isn't going to change to over 1000+. That was his argument using an example. But this doesn't mean facebook didn't change history.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 10:10 PM
3

It really doesn't take a redpill to see that you are mostly trolling anyone who responds.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 08:20 PM
1

I wrote a book about this Details? I would love to read it. Similarly, you might like to read Democracy Incorporated. Unfortunately the author passed away recently, as I would bet he would've found a great many continuations of policies from Bush to the Obama administration. Or another great book is National Security and Double Government. I think this was his article/essay form of his book. IIRC, it was only like $15 on amazon.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 01:24 AM
1

Great posts wub. I'm always surprised at the few times this level of political analysis is reached and it is always brushed off as conspiratorial or "very Illuminati."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 12:20 AM
2

Research includes examining sources, not just a blanket dismissal for anything not .edu, .org, or .gov. Hertitage.org is sometimes used as a source, but I bet you would then blatantly dismiss it for being a conservative outlet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 12:33 AM
2

Wasn't her breaking up with him indicative of not wanting to be around him anymore? Sure, and in a perfect world he wouldn't have gone back and went ape-shit. But this isn't a perfect world, and like the other guy suggested, it wasn't a complete surprise when a very high-test fighter decides to commit crime. even when she chose to cut him out of her life According to this, the "relationship ended, started again and ended again, but Mack still felt that pull toward Koppenhaver. They stayed in tou…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 10:23 PM
6

He didn't say that was an "excuse." He is saying, or implying, that those that professionally fight are going to be more aggressive, violent, have have less self control than some nerdy engineer. Therefore, it is more wise to fear the fighter type over the engineer type. Or put in another way, guys like WM and say Mike Tyson are going to have different personalities than Bill Gates. they got offended at the implication that Christy Mack was partially to blame for getting brutalized. If I hang ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 01:01 AM
0

This is not conductive to discussion at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 03:48 AM
3

Orwell, Down and Out in Paris and London (Ch. 36): Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.C.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 03:45 AM
4

the guy seriously blames Feminism for his social awkwardness? I haven't read that blog post in a while, but that seems like quite the misrepresentation of his central point (i.e. a strawman).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/15 08:13 PM
1

Unfortunately it is over $40 on amazon, but maybe it is cheaper in UK, since it was written there.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/15 12:58 AM
2

Do you mean reviled? I don't think they are reviled in general. I do think some people against feminism don't like women, but also that much of the blowback against feminism is caused by its externalities that affect men, both perceived and/or real. And come on, feminism is popular. It might not be popular in the most current third-wave form, but most people in the West agree that women deserve the right to vote, hold property, and not have to be controlled by a man. These ideas are almost never…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 11:31 PM
3

Some sociologists think that identity politics has been used by capitalism overall to regress any opposition to it. A good book about this, written very recently in 2015, is Riots and Political Protest by Briggs, Winlow, Hall, and Treadwell. If you have academic access, you can probably find it for free through your university.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 09:23 PM
4

Secondly; the blowback against feminism is because traditionalists and male supremacists think that uppity bitches need to get back to the kitchen. Really? Don't be disingenuous to your idealogical opponents. Many of them do have logical reasons for their beliefs, just as you do for your own ideologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 09:16 PM
2

You could always email him yourself if you find something that you think is lacking in his points or hypotheses. I like Buss and his work, but I am not his spokesman. While I agree that scientists are not gods of wisdom, they certain have many evidences for hypotheses that I also see in my daily experiences. and he's been taken to task for it by legitimate, non-feminist scholars. Sure, and climate scientists are "taken to task" by those that disagree with their numerous findings, but that doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 12:41 AM
5

The "Women's Long-Term Mating Strategies" chapter (many of the chapters really) of David Buss's Evolutionary Psychology The New Science of the Mind (2007) seems to support TRP ideas. It has a massive amount of citations as well, and Buss is a highly esteemed researcher in the field.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 11:44 PM
1

Now, since the cartoons presented about feminism here When have cartoons been posted to PPD? Do you have links? This is the first time, or at least one of the very few times, that I have seen any cartoons have been posted, and I have been lurking for around a year give or take.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 09:54 PM
5

There shouldn't be much of a discussion when you link to a cartoon that removes any nuance from actual positions and instead makes them look silly. From this context, arguing for the positions in the cartoon already start off from a negative position, as you have "shown" that they are not to be taken seriously. Therefore, when you post a cartoon like this, it is merely bait to rile up any users that feel they are misrepresented by the cartoon, so that is why you don't deserve any discussion from…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 09:51 PM
1

"~evo psych~" http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/David-Buss-Evolutionary-Psychology-The-New-Science-of-the-Mind-2007-496p-Evolutionary-Psychology-3rd-ed.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 07:10 PM
2

his problem Nice assumption. Why is that when someone on this subreddit has a claim on what they see as a reality, they are met by projections about their life?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 12:22 AM
3

One can still have access to sex yet feel disdain towards promiscuity. You're so arrogant in your opinions that you state that the people here who disagree with you must be insecure, inexperienced, etc., which is the same thing as someone saying you have your particular opinions on this because you are a slut. It is a daft argument tactic used to dismiss perfectly legitimate opinions (on both sides). If you're going to stoop to that level, why even post here? Why not just stay in the blue pill s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 02:54 AM
2

Is pair bonding as a concept wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 02:37 AM
3

lol someone said that user got banned later on in the comments
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 08:19 PM
6

I'm one of the least masculine men you can find anywhere. I'm not going to say a guy needs to be ultra-alpha male to attract women, but its a problem when the BP ideology directs "men" to absolve ALL masculinity, then wonder how they are failing to find a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 07:02 PM
2

3 eyes = nominal, 2 = real, what is conceptualist?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:16 AM
2

only RP people think that. No, it doesn't take a RP to see that your posts are mostly low quality garbage. Most of your "discussions" end up turning to insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 02:08 AM
6

you're gonna talk about that over gun control? Found the liberal. It is interesting (assuming this source is correct), that America hasn't had a problem with mass shootings until the 1970s. The 70s appeared to have started the upward trend of mass shootings. Before the 70s, the worst decade of mass shootings was in the 30s, a really shitty time to be alive for many Americans. Why is it that with less gun control, there were less mass shootings in previous decades? If the "easy access to guns" is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 03:39 AM
1

13/15 NEVER getting into grad school with this aptitude!! :(
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 12:49 AM
3

this is it. insecurity 101. No. It is insecurity for some group of people and other people are choosing against a personality type. To think that it is 100% insecurity for 100% of those with the same opinion is laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 03:14 AM
1

But if that is the worst of your problems, you are pretty fortunate. As always goes the relative privation argument. However, it is important to realize that the desire for sex is deep impulse and to not be able to "itch it" is distressing, especially for those that are not asexuals. For instance, here is an Orwell quote that speaks to this (from *Down and Out in Paris and London, Ch 36): He is absolutely without hope of getting a wife, a mistress, or any kind of woman except— very rarely, when …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 08:45 PM
0

So now your argument is that sexual poverty isn't "true" poverty, instead of just not existing like it was in the first comment. Also, if we are going to do the whole relative privation thing, there are people that say even the poor in a first world country are not living in "true poverty" compared to someone else in the Congo. There are people that never have sex or even access to sex. That is sexual poverty. You might not find it "crushing," but I don't see how saying some people have 0 sex is…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 12:52 AM
1

The twin towers and the london bombings were government set ups. So if you think this, then surely you know the power of the government, and if so, wouldn't you want civilian gun ownership to help protect the last semblance of citizen control over your country? You're English right? Are you familiar with Orwell? “That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.” Any thoughts?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 07:10 PM
2

Yes it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 04:05 AM
10

who decidedly refuse to sleep with them no matter what. But for the incel, this is true unless they self-improve. Its not like these guys are aged 10 and begin being incels. These guys grow up throughout middle school, high school, and for some college without any sort of female attention. Many of them do not try to self-improve, leading them to post on /r9k/. You've posted before that you don't believe in any sort of social hierarchy, which may be why you don't believe that there are any males …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 03:36 AM
5

I've seen people graduate with degrees in my field who have no fucking idea what they're doing, they were just good at taking tests. Thats what I was sarcastically hinting at. He has this utmost arrogance for his opinions and doesn't have any skepticism or reservation that he could be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 01:31 AM
7

Cool, I don't think your reasons are justifications either. Maybe the other poster specifically said it was women's fault (with no nuance) and I missed it. But you can just think of this (differential attractiveness/reproduction, not the shooting) from an evolutionary perspective and it doesn't blame women. In almost every species, males have a high variation in sexual success, while females have a low variation in sexual success, meaning they are the gender that is highly likely to have sex and…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 12:39 AM
12

"we don't support this but these are my opinions on why this happened." That isn't a justification. That is an attempt at explanation. You seem to be saying that when the FBI or police attempt to theorize a serial killer's reasons for murder, this is the same as justifying that same action.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 12:23 AM
8

That is saying if we don't change anything, we are going to get the same output. That isn't saying that action is right (or reasonable) but that the action is borne from certain conditions and if we keep the same conditions we are bound to get more of the same action in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 12:17 AM
21

No one here is "justifying" the shootings. You may be talking about the people that you disagree with who basically say a lack of access to sex is a potential reason for violence, but I've read most of the comments here and I don't see a justification for killing anyone. Trying to understand the mind of someone else is not "justifying" their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 12:00 AM
6

Oh give it a fucking rest. Some men do not get laid, ever. Some portion of these men are upset about that. An even smaller portion will do something violent in response (among many other reasons, such as social ostracism). Now, I am not saying that anyone is supposed to lay these guys or anything like that, but you shouldn't ignore that human need for intimacy. For example, Orwell recognizes that need for intimacy and what happens to the male psyche when he does not obtain it: there is the degra…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 11:25 PM
10

Anandya is a doctor, so whatever he says is right and whatever is against his opinion is stupid. At least, that is what I've gathered from his posts in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 10:15 PM
17

you can't just tell a dude how to act normal What, you mean "Just be yourself!" doesn't actually do anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 10:06 PM
4

That thread is sickening, but you have to keep in mind the people that post there. Low to very low status individuals with few successes to speak of. Very few relationships, if any. Maybe college education. Probably social outcasts all their lives with some being bullied by others. I'm not saying this excuses anything they say, but to understand the symptoms, you must understand the disease.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 09:08 PM
1

It's due to progressivism. I said it was partly due to progressivism. You are saying there is absolutely no other reason besides that. Are you seriously under the notion that we aren't dying in moronic and pointless wars because of Netflix? Are you seriously denying that bread-and-circuses don't calm populations? Look it's simple. No, a national and global decline in violence is not simple. It is not solely due to only one input. That's stupid. I think your ideas are stupid too, but considering …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:45 AM
3

The world is at its most peaceful and most developed. I hope you are not implying that this is solely due to progressivism. There are probably hundreds of reasons for your quote and progressive ideas are only a drop in the bucket. Could also be due to declining test levels of Western men, readily available food for most people in most countries, readily available water, presence of multiple immersive diversions from reality, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 09:16 PM
4

Relevant Orwell quotes on incels (Down and Out in Paris and London, Ch: 36 I think): The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above —even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon. The reasons are not wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 12:35 AM
1

They don't want to feel like there's someone out there who is more jacked or with a bigger penis out there Do we read the same things? When I try to read RP for PPD purposes, it seems that they say to improve yourself so that you can adequately compete with someone that has more muscles for instance. They clearly acknowledge that there are very successful men; thats where the archetype of "Chad" came from, so I'm unsure as to why you think RPs don't want to acknowledge that reality. and the more…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 11:38 PM
2

Its PPD. For whatever reason the normal somewhat rage-full posts on reddit turn into personal digs and insults here (from both sides). Its like everyone has had an awful day and thus must make sure the other commenter needs to feel bad about their own selves. Its incredibly annoying, juvenile, and makes me call into question the maturity of the people that do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 01:27 AM
2

So congratulations. Your imaginary future creep world is looking pretty bright for guys like you. Why do some of your posts say things like this? Did you have a bad day today? Its like you are trying to be really mean, but I just don't understand why, especially when the other posters haven't been negative to you at all until you include petty things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 09:51 PM
5

http://jezebel.com/the-uplifting-tale-of-one-bros-fledgling-japanese-sex-1501380416 Ever seen a blog post about a weird sex toy designed to simulate the feeling of a vagina and thought, what kind of a lonely fuck would use one of those? The same chairsniffers who buy used women's underwear off ebay? I mean, probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 09:22 PM
1

Because that is the same thing as saying all Muslims want Sharia law just because there are millions of Muslims that do want that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 11:35 PM
1

He never told his followers to do the same . So if we follow this analogy, TRP ECs aren't telling RPs to physically prevent women from voting. Right? They are just exercising their opinion, like Mohammad exercised his opinion about marrying 9 year-olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 10:28 PM
1

Except that Muhammad never said that people should marry 9 year olds Didn't he marry one? while TRP ECs say But that doesn't translate to all other non-ECs having the same opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 10:15 PM
1

Do you know any contributor that believes women should vote ? I don't. Okay, but my point is that just because ideological leaders have "X" opinion, doesn't mean 1) that opinion is even in the ideology (as you said with Islam) and 2) that the ideological group also has the same opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 10:08 PM
1

Lmao, but your only argument that all red pills support disestablishment was that a few "important contributors" also have that view. If you only use that as basis to your claim, then you have personal bias against theredpill, as you can see that isn't a valid argument for Islam but it suddenly is for TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 09:57 PM
1

So you must think Muslims all want to have a 9 year-old wife since Mohammed (very important to Islamic ideology) married a 9 year-old. Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 09:04 PM
2

Its simple evolutionary theory that there is differential levels of success between the genders of animals. Typically, it is the males that have high variation in success (some very low/none, many middle, some high/very high) and the females have low variation (i.e. most reproduce successfully with only very few having no success). Why would human sexual behavior be any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 09:09 PM
13

Thats a great platitude to say, but what do you actually mean by that? For example, would you want less government in the area of chemical regulation? Worker's rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 08:32 PM
2

But that is silly to go to a sub for discussion/debate and basically troll for "lols." Then again, most of the mods favour your ideology, which might influence the amount of moderation that your trolling is subject to. This is different from subs like politicaldiscussion where "pointing and laughing" because the other person has a justifiably reasonable opinion gets deleted, since there really is no point in doing so besides to troll/circlejerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 08:30 PM
-1

Of course, the problem with that point of view is that TRP and TBP don't exist on a spectrum of any kind. So people are either 100% RP or 0%? But then again, I guess you aren't a woman, so you wouldn't feel insulted on any level by baseless insults leveled towards women as a whole. What is baseless? I see claims made by evolutionary psychologists chided as "baseless" and "biotroofs" despite most claims being grounded in reality. Isn't it possible to overlook said "insults" and actually view the …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 07:35 PM
9

Which in turn makes you look silly to the people in the middle of the spectrum, and gives more weight to the non insulting arguments presented by the other party. You probably have at least one set of opinions that deserve to be mocked, but that doesn't mean you should be insulted for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 05:42 PM
2

I don't see how anyone that reads the opinions of the social elites, political science, history, dynamics of human relationships, and have lots of real life social experience not be politically or personally cynical.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/15 12:00 AM
1

Thats funny you ask that; I'm attracted to latinas (tho I am white hispanic) and my white (mom's side of family is full white) cousin is dating a latino. Also both in Texas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 06:29 PM
1

People in the govrenmant are rarely held accountable My point is that the average citizen has more power to hold gvt officials accountable compared to CEOs, and those CEOs "just get fired" too, so I am unsure what your point was there. You say CEOs are held accountable too, which is true, but I'm saying its easier to elect a new official (or have a recall) than it is to organize a boycott that spans multiple business quarters. In a perfect free market, everyone would probably be able to afford t…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:08 PM
1

I just told you what harm can happen if the truth is told. It would be a breach of doctor/patient confidentiality, which is a really important thing for a lot of reasons. And the doctor would lose his job on top of that. A savvy government lawyer could probably draft up some arguments similar to this about how there should never be whistleblowers. Like when you say: And if it became a regular thing for doctors to tell everyone the secrets of their patients...people with AIDS would be afraid to g…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:45 PM
1

And you want these people to be in control of ALL of the healthcare industry? I'd rather electable representatives be in control as opposed to CEOs and shareholders that only see the companies bottom-line in control. At least representatives can be held accountable through elections; CEOs can hardly be held accountable if they are doing what is seen as best for the company. You can try to organize a nationwide boycott of some sort, but that is much more difficult compared to an election. Didn't …
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:23 PM
9

My RES will have 50 posts for one page of comments/submissions in the user overview, so all I have to do is go to the bottom of the screen a few times, count the page that I am on (x50), and look at the date of the bottom-most post.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:15 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 10:44 PM
1

Lol are living in an 80s movie? Nah, just a major university.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 08:21 AM
2

Do you think a universities' sorority house is going to think the engineering robotics team guys are men compared to the football team?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 11:06 PM
0

I prefer (democratic) socialism over objectivism myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 08:33 PM
-1

Why does TBP automatically assume red pill field reports are fake, but accept posts like these at face value?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 07:57 PM
8

Okay, but if a group (mras) is being categorized as being "neoreactionary" because they are against policies (duluth model) that are considered "progress" even though they are actually not equal or good progress, then what is the point of calling them reactionary if not just for a stupid label like the use of "sjw?" I.e., there is a difference between being against progress like women voting and being against "progress" like the duluth model. Do you agree here? The OP didn't even have an argumen…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:45 PM
5

What do you think of this and do you think that he might have received more funding in 2015 compared to just 2 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:37 PM
5

What is your point? I'm familiar with what a reactionary is. My point was that if policies like the duluth model are considered "progress," then it makes sense to be a reactionary in that context.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:34 PM
10

neo-reactionary movement When progress includes things like the problematic duluth model, its easy to be "reactionary." Maybe I am wrong about your opinion, but with such a short statement I cannot help but to think that you hold every progressive action as good without actually knowing if the action is truly good to all of society, i.e. men, and not just women. With that premise, it is easy to call your opponents reactionaries, but if there are problems with a certain action (e.g. duluth model)…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:07 PM
17

What if they don't have the capital to actually do anything though? Its not like your average middle class male can set-up a men's shelter whenever he wants to. For the average American, that would take years of saving up enough money to do something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 07:59 PM
4

Yeah, but for some people, doing it the fake way leads to it becoming learned. By the way, this sounds really similar to how some musicians say you should be able to "feel" the music when playing, yet other musicians don't have that same "feeling."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 04:10 PM
8

So basically, non-charismatic guys that learn the things that you are doing, e.g. the line that you said and the mindset behind it, are being fake?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 07:23 PM
1

Yup, every single "field report" posted is absolutely false and are all just made up lies. Thousands of these posts - all just made up!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:36 PM
0

Is this speech categorically different from insults to RPers that don't get moderated either? E.g. "sociopaths, psychopaths, autistic, aspergers, not-a-real-man™, biologically inferior," etc. I've seen all these used against RPers in an insulting manner. Why aren't you also against that? Does that not stifle debate, or the lack thereof, that this sub at least tries to have?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:18 PM
0

No, but they are still humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 07:13 PM
3

Holy shit you sound like a 4chan kid. I love when bp resorts to trolling when the other party doesn't agree with their point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 02:06 PM
2

I'm a biologist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 10:40 PM
1

Chinese society was patriarchal through Confucianism, a secular ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 06:13 PM
6

So the typical nerd should always be quiet, meek, and shy? That is rarely the path to social success. Why is trying to act like a leader being "someone other than themselves?" It seems like you are trying to imply that they are inherently non-leaders and should thus stay that way forever. Maybe I am wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 09:52 PM
8

Glass ceiling = bad; glass basement = acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 09:42 PM
3

I think it varies a lot depending on the particular social setting. Ya, I just find it very interesting that there have been multiple revolutions in dozens of different countries (e.g. the French Rev., Bolshevik Rev., Communist Rev. in China, etc.) that have arisen as a result of numerous social disparities, i.e. class issues, as a result of wealth/income inequality. However, even though these class issues are still present in most Western countries, the activist masses seem to be using sex and …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 10:31 PM
7

Male privilege is the strongest of the societal privileges in the US (I would rate white privilege at a close second, and first in some communities). Why do you think those two are stronger than class privilege?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 10:02 PM
13

You're so right: Being able to socially maneuver to best benefit oneself is so nasty!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 12:52 AM
1

Okay that is a basic definition of genetics but that isn't explaining how "negative parental experiences...speaks to your genetics."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 07:04 PM
1

not to mention it speaks to your genetics. How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 06:45 PM
23

This is just as retarded as saying most feminists are fat and ugly. I wish this place would clean up the fat and have less trolling from both sides, but we can't always get what we want, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 05:54 PM
1

not a race Israel disagrees.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:18 PM
4

Believing in these shit tests isn't normal in the slightest. I've had women literally say they "were testing" me in certain situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 09:42 PM
1

Having kids later than earlier is efficient. Only in terms of money, but not in terms of genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 09:37 PM
1

Also , according to statistcs people are actually more likely to get divorced if they married young[1] . Arn't there other factors though? For instance, what if it was the culture of the 2000s that propagandizes having many relationships and this is what causes young women to get divorced? Or in other words, what did the divorce statistics for young couples look like during, say, the 1950s when American culture didn't promote promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 01:33 AM
2

It can be for both fun and a commodity.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 10:01 PM
4

TroopCaptain just tries to be condescending to anyone who doesn't have the same views as much as s/he can.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 07:22 PM
1

I don't think that mocking involuntary celibacy does your side any good.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 09:16 PM
10

get downvoted lol. And no reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 08:33 PM
1

It is only natural. Polyamory and the tendency for polygamy are natural, but what if monogamy was better for society (overall) than poly relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 10:23 PM
1

i think the red pill 'we were lied to narrative' is a myth to to deflect personal cluelessness/failure onto others I thought it was about how there is a certain ideology that is usually in most of recent popular culture - that men need a woman and should do anything he can to get her (putting her on a pedestal). Usually this involves getting her flowers or being a provider by some skill that he has. She in turn will fall in love with him, etc. deflect personal cluelessness/failure onto others Do…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 02:22 AM
3

Not wanting a woman that has slept with 50+ people is puritanical?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 08:40 PM
1

Your generation is stupid and too easily swayed by pop culture and media. You do realize that it was your generation that invented the propaganda that the newer generations consume, right? When millennials were growing up, which generation controlled the media, advertising corporations, and public relations firms? It wasn't the newborn millennials, that's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 10:50 PM
2

It can't be good to be this paranoid, dude. Lmao, this sub is awful for any discourse. I'm not saying his ideas are right or wrong, but just saying he is paranoid without an actual discussion is an awful way to communicate. Its like if Orwell or Huxley gave you their manuscripts and instead of giving any discussion, criticism, or praise, you just claim they are paranoid and imply that their mental state is unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 10:46 PM
0

Why do you think it is a fantasy, and not something that could actually happen? It just seems like you are very dismissive of the whole idea without giving it any merit, and so instead of discussing any of his actual points or predictions, you just imply that his life sucks and that he wants something better through virtual reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 10:44 PM
2

Well if someone gets something wrong about a person's ideology, they are probably going to correct it, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 08:21 PM
5

Just be yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 05:15 PM
12

This subreddit is funny. For all the hate against TRP, it seems like most of the people on TBP side greatly dislike men who can't get laid. "autistic" "asbergers" "grow up" "mentally damaged" etc. I see that stuff routinely, it is almost hilarious how much they hate those men and it seems like they dislike them more than any red piller.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 05:12 PM
6

"Purity" is a made up value Some men think that a pure partner would benefit them reproductively just as some women think an athletic partner would benefit them reproductively. by insecure men lmao. Are you lashing out because you aren't pure?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 06:59 PM
9

George Orwell on sexual starvation, originally about homeless men (tramps): The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above —even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon. The reasons are not worth discu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 09:00 PM
5

I don't hate the Guardian. True, they might get some issues wrong, but I cannot disagree with them on their stances toward civil liberties in relation to both the UK and American governments. They seem to be one publication that is willing to do more impactful reporting than what the WSJ or the NYT seems to do in regards to civil liberties, national security, etc.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 01:37 AM
16

Hes a feminist because he dislikes Dershowitz? Lets not be hysterical here.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 05:41 PM
17

Admins decided it was time to kill KiA without explicitly doing so.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:19 PM
245

I applaud your morality, even knowing that the girl wlll/has already found someone else to fuck instead of her bf.
/r/seduction27/12/14 09:40 PM
0

Supporting BDS isn't the same as supporting a ban on GTA5. GTA5 doesn't have claimed human rights abuses attached to the making of the product. I'm fine with supporting trade from peoples with different ideology from myself, but why should I support trade from a country that are accused of human rights abuses, especially when some of those abuses are de facto?
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:31 PM
1

Just because they're a government funded organization doesn't mean they have to have a judge and jury for every disciplinary decision. Yup. That is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:22 AM
1

Freeing Palestine is worthwhile. Maybe not to you, but you are not the one living in a shit hole.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:00 PM
10

I agree. Poverty is a factor. However, iirc, the assault rates for African Americans are still higher than for poor whites and poor Hispanics.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:45 PM
4

But what about that guy who literally followed her around for god knows how long? There is probable unanimous disapproval about that. Its a non issue in the sense that we probably all agree that is weird
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:10 PM
5

look at assault rates by race
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:04 PM
0

Topkek. Are you really going to allow her to ad-hominem/poison the well for only your sources?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:37 PM
3

This is tangentially related to the thread discussion but it is interesting http://www.mensjournal.com/magazine/building-a-bigger-action-hero-20140418
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:54 PM
25

I like how a few of the ladies rushed to "what about the women."
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:55 PM
0

Stupid people who did no research and were easily lead on. Thats funny that you say that. I consider myself both feminist and mra; I became feminist after an American literature class exploring dozens of male and female writers in the 1600s to 1860s.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 12:30 AM
1

Unfortunately, the pendulum here swings to the complete opposite side instead of somewhere in the middle.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:36 PM
0

lol, you sent a complaint about a 5 year old opinion article?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:45 PM
-4

So, your argument is that gender roles were OK then, so the exclusion of around 1/2 of the population from education, politics, landowning, voting rights, etc. is/was justified? I thought the whole point about MRs was that both genders have and had their advantages and disadvantages and that we should work to remove disadvantages for both genders. What is the point if you just say 1 gender has all the disadvantages and deny them for the other gender? There is a long running theme about the so-ca…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:10 PM
-3

Dunno man, I'm not a feminist but I still disagree with her.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:04 PM
0

Owning fields I can only comment on America's history, and for much of American history women could not own land. knowing the value of her goods, working with her hands So more stuff around the house/farm then, yeah? Nothing in there about politics, leading the community, preaching to a congregation, etc.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:02 PM
-3

Sacrifice? Its not so much sacrifice as it is love: 25Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, 27and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. So if we combine the 3 passages its basically the husband should love the wife so the wife can be super pure! Even if my interpretation is wrong, men being o…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:10 PM
-5

In the Western world 2014? No. Historically? Yes. Oppression is even in the bible, a holy book for one of the biggest religions in history: 22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. Even Abigail Adams wanted more rights for women (1776): I desire you w…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:15 PM
1

Read some literature from the 1800s and see what patriarchy looked like. We can debate if its still in existence today, but it definitely was a thing back in the day. Abigail Adams, in a letter to John Adams (1776): ...I desire you would Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favourable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could... That your Sex are Naturally Tyrannical is a Truth so thorough…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:01 PM
3

Depends on what you want to call the feminists claims. For instance, I've read some posts that say MRAs want to literally go back to the 1800s or some bullshit. I would be highly surprised if even 10% of the people subscribed here believe that. I just don't see the issue with saying both men and women have privileges and disadvantages in today's society. I've also read some posts claiming women have 0 privileges and men have 0 disadvantages, and I really just cannot believe that. What do you bel…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:35 PM
5

Yeah he should've just "manned up," right?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:46 PM
2

go back to /pol/
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:53 PM
13

Wait, the book is trash before you've even read it? :O
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:09 PM
8

$65,133 annual tuition, room and board Holy shit. That is just a bit less than my family takes home in an entire year. How does a poor man have more privilege than a woman who can attend an Ivy university and all the benefits that it provides?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:39 PM
14

So she can't be right in some ways, yet be wrong in others?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:27 PM
3

making up most of congress and basically ruling the earth for the last 10,000 years. You do realize that is only the top 5-10% of all men right? http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/is-there-anything-good-about-men-and-other-tricky-questions/?_php=true&_type=blogs&hp&_r=1 Read that. Tell me what power all those men had that couldn't even reproduce to the next generation. Yes, some of them might have died in a war, disease, or some other mishap, but the vast majority of those are men wi…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:01 PM
1

pseudo science Here is a paper from Europeans detailing how circumcision isn't very useful in a Western context. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.full.pdf If you want to do that to your kids, good for you, but I've been saying this to others that the procedure is unnecessary with proper hygiene. Maybe you've seen other papers with pseudo science, but there are legitimate claims against the ritual.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:07 AM
3

Abigail Adams to John Adams, March 31 1776 Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could. If perticuliar care and attention is not paid to the Laidies we...will not hold ourselves bound by any Laws in which we have no voice, or Representation. That your Sex are Naturally Tyrannical is a Truth so throughly established as to admit of no dispute, but such of you as wish to be happy willingly give up the harsh title of Master for the …
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:36 PM
3

The founding fathers also almost universally owned slaves; and, before you counter that they hated slavery in their writings, I will already say that they obviously agreed with slavery enough to use those black men and women for their own personal profit.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 09:07 PM
-6

Yeah bro, taking away voting rights is so red pill
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 09:05 PM
-5

This is done under some mythical concept that somehow, by being preserved from the rigours of dangerous and hard work in factories and mines etc, and from the true rigours of war - they were 'oppressed'. LOL. So a woman couldn't even be a member of Congress or Senate until the 20th century; yet they weren't oppressed? Come on. In contemporary America there doesn't seem to be much oppression. But if the year was suddenly 1840, I wouldn't choose to be a women if I had the choice.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:14 PM
1

You did well, its unfortunate that the thread is dying (dead?) though.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 12:00 AM
0

If you bothered to read our "mission statement" you will find this is a space for the discussion of sexual strategy. I'm not saying anyone is wrong, I'm just telling everyone to not call women sluts because you morally disagree with their actions. It might escape your brain, but you can disagree with someone's actions (that doesn't hurt you or anyone else) without name-calling like you are still in high school. In your OP, you basically said that no one is calling for harassment against women th…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 11:14 PM
1

I gave a valid, sound counterpoint about it being not supremacism at its inception at the least, and you call it bitching. LOL This all came around because the OP said: I dont think anyone is really suggesting these people ought to be harassed. Which is different when you have a multitude of posters calling women sluts here and in numerous other threads. Do you disagree that slut is thrown around here? I simply pointed out this seemingly obvious contradiction, then its implied that I am a femini…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 11:04 PM
1

Ok. When did it become supremacism? Was it supremacism when women couldn't vote at all? Thats like saying an MRA is essentially for male supremacism, instead of acknowledging that both sexes have positive and negative privileges and that both movements are working on removing the negative ones. There are some that take it too far, which would be supremacism, however both movements didn't start that way.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 09:51 PM
-1

Because classifying someone as a slut in your own head When its posted online or said its clearly no longer in anyone's head. Have you ever considered taking up feminism? Omg feminism, an evil boogy(wo)man. christ. I didn't say anyone had to date anyone they didn't want to; only that one should keep their subjective moral judgements to themselves. How the fuck is that feminist in nature, and even if it was, feminist doesn't automatically = bad.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 08:59 PM
-4

I dont think anyone is really suggesting these people ought to be harassed Which is why "slut" doesn't get thrown around on this subreddit, right? Oh wait. personally, I wouldn't date a woman w/ a significant (15+) amount of previous partners, but I'm not going to shout slut or whore on either the internet nor in real life.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 07:21 PM
5

muh purity
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 07:17 PM
4

Completely agree; and, personally I wouldn't go for someone taken myself, but I wouldn't call anyone who did scum, etc.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:36 PM
-1

There is always someone out there. Unless your genetics are completely awful, chances are there will be someone that your body will completely love chemically. Whether they have a personality to match is a different story. Love = chemical feelings + personality match. Sometimes personalities don't have to match if both partners are accommodating.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 07:32 PM
2

Lol. If you are ok with your shitty car that isn't near as awesome as my car (bmw i8), you must not be in love with yourself.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 05:53 PM
-4

Feminists are not "by definition" sexist unless MRAs are "by definition" sexist.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:33 AM
5

good on ya mate
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 01:21 AM
3

Feminists say they also fight for men's causes. Why are no feminist groups fighting for him?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 08:15 PM
-3

Ok, thanks for contributing your opinion.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 12:59 AM
-5

So even if their wives are having their own children, they still are not "men?" Thanks for the laugh mate.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 09:33 PM
9

There was a thread about a man who slept with escorts before and not during his new relationship. He told his gf, she got mad, then he posted the thread. Almost all the responses were about how the gf was justified and that he was disgusting. Complete 180 here. :/
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 07:43 PM
4

Well its from a conservative think tank, so I wouldn't be surprised they would smuggle that in.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 06:53 AM
8

but I've seen more beautiful women walking down the street Right? Its not like models are some uber-rare construct of beauty. Just go to any prestigious university and there will be women just as beautiful as models like Kerr.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:44 AM
0

Well, my experiences differ from yours. In addition, I don't think "feminism" as any sort of familial, cultural, or moral construct would be able to turn any already straight person directly to gay or lesbian. Also, that sounds like something a religious conservative would say (not that you personally are or anything). Living in the south, especially the Bible Belt, I hear lots of things and this is something that sounds like what I would hear. Its almost like saying that if you and your wife li…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 09:08 PM
-1

I can't prove you wrong anymore than I couldn't prove a racist wrong. If someone is going to hate on a specific subset of a population, they are going to do it. Furthermore, you didn't even say you disagreed with them morally, or that you disagree with their actions. You just said they have a "mental illness," when this has been a documented phenomena both in humans and an incredibly huge amount of other mammals. Your view that homosexuality is a mental illness is why an incredibly brilliant man…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 08:59 PM
1

people that have been brought up in feminist households whose daughters later become lesbian. Just a coincidence? Sorry bud, but that sounds completely idiotic.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 08:25 PM
1

Blatant discrimination on trp. Nice.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/13 08:24 PM
1

It wasn't all that long ago that most men couldn't vote either. In the UK the right of the voting by the common man was paid for with blood in WW1. Yup, most of the lower and some middle class men couldn't vote for a very long time as well. But having a classist system doesn't mean that there wasn't also a patriarchal system, i.e. women were oppressed for being women. For example, in the Torah women are considered property for men; like how Africans were enslaved because of racism and classism, …
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:26 AM
2

didn't say it was
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:07 AM
-1

in their detached and virtual theories of patriarchal blah hegemony just curious. Do you think we were once under what feminists call patriarchy say... 60 years ago? 100 years ago? What about when women couldn't vote; do you think that there was a logical reasoning behind not wanting women to vote? To give another example: Why did it take almost 150 years for the first female senator to arrive? Or, how about contemporary Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and countries o…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:31 AM
0

I performed the best spot cleaning of my life that night. With Clorox's toothbrush. thats fucking nasty.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 11:25 PM
0

Didn't see this coming? How are insurance companies going to add 20+ million people without increasing costs of coverage?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:52 PM
7

http://www.returnofkings.com/19175/8-ways-to-spot-a-transsexual Like, I can/will agree on some stuff here, e.g. being social, recognizing and using social status, not yielding to cultural standards, refusing to cater to women just because they are women, etc. But I just see a link like that (is it satire? half-satire, or actually serious) and really get quite annoyed. I don't even know many, if any, trans* people, but I can at least see that an article like that is really hurtful, and almost see…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 09:14 PM
21

You guys need to watch some of the shit you post. There was an RoK link a few days ago that basically said all trans* people are freaks; that isn't the type of thing that is going to get you more men and women to change their minds. Many of the comments here are also just generic "Us vs Them" approach, hinting that everything that is posted here is 100% true, and that they just don't like the "truth." For example, this comment: Because almost the entire population has been brainwashed/socially e…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 06:53 PM
1

Become friends (what is this?) with them, and see who they hang out with. They probably have at least 1 single friend that they would love to play matchmaker for.
/r/seduction25/11/13 01:07 AM
2

However, if our generals are saying that repealing of DADT is going to make our military less effective, even if it's by 1%, I'm going to listen to them. You would believe anything that comes out of "our generals" mouths with no evidence or questions asked? How do you know what he says isn't BS, and is just saying that because DADT is against his/her views politically? According to this source, there has been very little negative effect, if any, by repealing dadt. Most of the sources saying the …
/r/TheRedPill20/11/13 05:42 PM
2

while I mostly agree with your post, you put (tm) next to patriarchy like its a joke. debatably for the 21st century, sure, but look at the Middle East right now, or America 50 years ago. how were those not examples of patriarchies?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:39 PM
1

you boss.
/r/seduction19/11/13 06:53 PM
-3

You seem surprised. While not all the content is this way, quite a bit of RP stuff is about traditionalism and keeping the status quo; i.e. this article was written like the author was born and raised in the 50s.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 09:07 PM
1

Bechdel test isn't for a single, or even series of films. It is for genre-wide application. I.e. Star Wars Ep. 6 doesn't pass the BT. So what. There are objections to the test that definitely apply. However if applied to a large selection of films and if most fail, then it points to a form of under representation of women.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:11 PM
2

Gangs.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 08:55 PM
-4

It was also clearly more than just a no, and was actually quite rude about it.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 08:45 PM
9

/r/creepypms is exactly like cringe and cringepics; they are just platforms for bullying and laughing at other people some of the content is legit, but there is quite a bit that really shouldn't be on there.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:28 PM
2

Besides the whole having a boyfriend thing, I don't really see what the problem is. Why do you think its filthy for a woman to have sex?
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 02:04 AM
1

Sidestepping? I don't know who you originally replied to, but it wasn't me. Nor do I think mrm is inherently transphobic; however, that is separate from claiming that some posts here are transphobic.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:41 PM
0

No, he says they're people. No? He states they are lying to themselves quite a few times; it is a delusion to him. because that isn't a rational decision. It isn't something that is possible. Pretending to? Sure. Actually being? No. Yes. I am saying that trans people embrace a lie to assuage their ego when they decide "Oh, I must really be a girl". He completely denies the agency of trans people and thinks that they are stroking their narcissism when they want to change. The delusion here isn't …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:16 PM
2

Disagree; he groups the entire trans* population together and says they are all lying to themselves. Maybe not transphobic in the literal "scared" definition, but there is certainly some animosity in those posts of his. If a pastor came up to my college and said that all gay people are deluding themselves, he would be laughed out of the institution. Switch gay for trans* and that's exactly the message of his posts.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:17 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1lumj8/my_son_wears_dresses_get_over_it/cc31rfx
/r/MensRights30/10/13 07:30 PM
1

That's feminism for you: look at half the pain in the world, and blame it all on the other suffering half. So you deny that the middle east needs feminism? A place that has countries that don't allow women to vote, drive, or do almost anything without their husbands' permission? For western countries, a macro type equality has largely been achieved. This is why we should look at mens issues, but not in countries like the middle east where women have to ask permission to do almost anything, those…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:50 PM
1

You just did what I asked you not to do, you only looked at the female side and ignored the male side Probably because the female side has it objectively worse than the other. Women can't even vote in Saudi Arabia yet, and you telling me im glossing over men's issues?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:45 PM
1

That is laughable. You are telling me that, for example, women in Saudi Arabia don't need feminism? From the wiki of "women's rights in Saudi Arabia:" Under Saudi law, all females must have a male guardian, typically a father, brother or husband. The guardian has duties to, and rights over, the woman in many aspects of civic life. That is literally a patriarchy. Do you not agree? Now of course it is different for Western countries, but for others such as the example please change my view.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:29 PM
-30

Not rape, but I can understand why she could be upset if the guy gave the video to his friends, which is obviously what he did.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:48 PM
1

My downvotes prove it. cute
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:11 PM
3

http://twentypullups.com/
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:23 AM
3

anyone who holds any opinion based on common sense He thinks trans people are pretending; is that common sense? Do you want other potential men to come on here and see him spout that shit? Then, if you actually form a coherent reply, he ignores you like he did my post after I gave him some science. So, yeah, despite your sarcasm, I do agree that we shouldn't be associated with someone like him.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:15 PM
1

Just realize that it is a long process to change your habits then your behavior then ultimately your mindset. Its a long game, my friend, so do not be discouraged if you still feel the same way next weekend; the mind is a powerful thing and you just simply will not be able to change in a few days time. Take it slow and steady and don't give up :)
/r/seduction29/09/13 03:30 AM
7

His specific point is that generalizations are bad and you shouldn't and can't paint feminism as "about hating men and wanting to maim them" just because a small sect of people have that view. Generalizations are bad. Just because a few posts on /MRA are transphobic doesn't mean we are all transphobic, right?
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:25 PM
1

Didn't know that, thanks.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:42 PM
1

You think government should step in and limit companies and I think that is wrong because I support a free market and people achieving their best. I haven't said anything about any government intervention. My argument was strictly confined to how a majority holding of news media hurts democracy. Its also funny that you mention intervention, especially considering how Australia had to amend their media ownership laws to allow Murdoch to continue owning Australian media. I support a free market as…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:19 PM
1

Again, you divert the argument with trying to say what "I" like and how I am "angry." freedom and capitalism. Do you understand what those mean? Snarky; notice how my reply to you wasn't dripping with condescension. You are being silly because you don't like murdoch and his medias opinions and the fact that lots of other people like them. Yet another time where you don't argue my points, you try to make this an argument about myself. Can you try to debate my points without it coming down to what…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:48 PM
1

because of the people who buy papers, most buy his There isn't much competition, is there? If you don't like Murdoch being so successful I don't have anything against his success, and its quite dishonest to imply otherwise. then be angry at the people who buy his papers Why should one direct "anger" at the average layman than the mastermind? Free market means it's free for anyone to try and compete Regardless if they want to, probably 90-95% of Australians do not have the amount of capital neede…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:04 PM
-1

Well you showed your bias there. As opposed to your bias and sexism? the left are a bunch of bitches and pussies Lets keep it classy, rob.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:20 PM
1

You make this subreddit worse for the rest of us when you spit that vitriol.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:17 PM
1

But hey if Rupert Murdoch wants you think otherwise then better believe him right? Doesn't News Limited own the clear majority of newspapers there? Do you know if its TV and radio as well?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:11 PM
1

Do you consider one person owning a majority of the market a free market? How is having Murdoch corporation w/ a clear majority in newspapers a free market?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:08 PM
2

Wow, how about you chill w/ that. I'm sure we can tolerate a discussion w/ ppl on both sides of the issue, yeah?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:01 PM
1

I realize that.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:59 PM
-5

Right, but there are certain areas that are much more prone to getting an infection than others.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:02 PM
4

I get offended when I am here sometimes. Just yesterday, there was a comment that said: trans people embrace a lie And also that, in regarding their own being a different gender mentally: Except. You aren't. You never will be. You know it. You've just realized that if you can lock yourself away in an echo chamber that you can avoid that truth. This was the top comment. Then when I replied with actual science about the matter, he never replied back. So, I'm sure that you can see there are legitim…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:29 PM
3

When infact even after sex reassignment surgeries trans people's are still suffering from depression, suicide etc. Quoting from Sophiehp down below: However, modern Psychology/psychiatry have found that Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People not only exists, but the majority of transsexual people suffers from life long depression, low self-esteem and suicide attempts, also that transsexual people that goes trough(sic) a transition, 95% of the time they get better, much better,…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:29 AM
-1

Its always a brigade; surely, there cannot be those in MRA that don't share your opinion.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:08 PM
-2

You are either completely out of your fucking element, or lost in your own mental gymnastics for the purpose of never admitting to be incorrect. Are we starting the personal attacks now? Lets tone it down a notch please, remember that these are logical fallacies. My post did not accuse you, nor did the language accuse you in any way. If you think I was accusing you, great.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:05 PM
1

It isn't something that is possible. There is quite a bit of evidence that shows physical differences between men, and MtF individuals; and women & FtM individuals. Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Regardless of sexual orientation, men had almost twice as many somatostatin neurons as women (P < 0.006). The number of neurons in the BSTc of male-to-female transsexuals was similar to that of the females (P = 0.83). In contrast, the neuron number of a female-to-male transsexual was found to be in the male…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 11:00 PM
-4

I didn't say that you did; I said "a person" could. Meaning that someone can be derogatory to another human being without fear, physical, or mental pain involved. I didn't give any indication that you were doing this. Lets not jump to conclusions, OK? :)
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:35 PM
-4

Can you point out where I expressed a fear of transgendered people? Can you point out where I suggested that they be physically harmed? A person can discriminate against someone without fear, or pain, involved.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:07 PM
-1

Don't bother. In a thread about generalizations that feminists do a month back, he decided to use a sweeping generalization in his post. GWR: single woman into the punk look is a completely indoctrinated feminazi imbecile with about a tenth of the intelligence she tells herself she has. I tried to debate with him about it, he eventually said that I didn't understand demographics; I then asked him to show me any study about his generalization, and he never replied back to me. Source thread
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:05 PM
0

Rather than saying "It's OK, Stevie, you can express yourself however you like," Why can't a human rationally decide that they mentally belong to the opposite sex? Then, in the very next paragraph, you say that they actually just "never will be." So, you are in every trans human's mind and actually understand what they are feeling? Especially enough to say, for certain, that they are not who they think they are mentally? I think that often, what you're dealing with is a boy or young man who does…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:01 PM
1

looks like a smear piece. play nice, ladies
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:35 AM
8

unfortunately, metsman is right, and you do make everyone else here look worse with that bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:48 PM
7

Yeah, I really can't believe shit like gets upvoted here. To have a video full of generalizations against MRAs, then the top comment is the same generalization directed at everyone else. Its ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:41 PM
4

That's how demographics work. lrn2sociology. Then can you show me the statistic data that shows all women in the punk scene are: 1) Indoctrinated 2) "Feminazi," in fact I will throw you a bone and let you use "Feminist" 3) Not intelligent Show me the data that allows you to say all women, 100% is the only thing that constitutes "all," in that scene are those things. Show me.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:38 PM
1

Because some...gasp...are misogynistic.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:18 PM
0

Are you serious? The top comment of this whole post is /u/giegerwasright's rant about how all women in the punk scene are "completely indoctrinated feminazi imbecile[s]." Yet, its the top comment. What does that tell people outside of this subreddit?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:17 PM
5

You are using generalizations, anyone can see this; I am unsure how it has not caught your eye. OP's video also has generalizations (MRA = rape supporter). Do you like to use generalizations too, akin to the video? Do you think those generalizations contribute to the discussion, or sway more minds to your argument?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 10:13 PM
2

Lots of ad hominems, and really doesn't stray far from attacks on Anita's character. Of all the "rebuttal" videos that you could have posted, you choose one with inane and, quite frankly, sophomoric arguments. You completely lack empathy, like, I'm starting to think, like, I'd like to believe that you're a better person than that, but you lack empathy and you just look at everyone as an object, and that's how you see yourself too. And its really, really, really sad. Not only does she make a clai…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:03 PM
-1

Right? Its not like agreeing with her videos makes you automatically go against MRs; one can be in the MRM camp and still think that there should be more female representation in video games. There obviously is an overrepresentation of certain genders and tropes in video games. Its not the end of the world if thats the case.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:56 PM
1

Keep posting on reddit and eventually you will be accused of being a christian on /r/atheism, which has happened to me :(
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:30 AM
1

Can you explain why those stats are phony? Other than that they were collected by feminists? Saying shit like that is why some people are turned off to /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:27 AM
2

like jim carrey
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:42 AM
2

They don't have any opinions worth mentioning, so they try to downplay the ones that do
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:41 PM
3

BF: Yeah well it's not like it's such a big loss. LOL. Best part of the conversation
/r/seduction28/09/12 01:54 PM
1

What was initiation like? I'm really interested and don't mind doing silly things and making an ass out of myself, but I don't want to drink until I pass out, etc.
/r/seduction08/09/12 02:12 AM
1

Its not like that everywhere, I went to UT Austin (45000+) and it wasn't like that
/r/seduction26/08/12 02:31 PM
2

Bro ROTC is like a ticket to women, but then again I did Army so it might be different for you air force
/r/seduction26/08/12 02:30 PM
4

Hes just an ass. Keep doing this
/r/seduction21/08/12 07:57 PM
1

Try going to a piano bar, those have more of a softer kind of music that isn't too loud. Plus they attract a different kind of woman to the venue
/r/seduction19/08/12 03:36 AM
2

Looks like you got game now bro, good work. Keep at it
/r/seduction12/07/12 01:47 AM
1

Throw a party with her. Invite your really cool friends, and get her to invite her hot friends. Ez.
/r/seduction11/04/12 10:05 PM
2

idk where you went to college, but here room and board is 4k. getting an apartment for a similar amount of time + all the expenses is around 4k. home is fucking free
/r/seduction22/07/11 02:04 PM
0

because on a website like reddit, usernames are just oh so important
/r/seduction18/07/11 05:35 PM
8

or if she was really married, she wouldnt have said anything about a husband, maybe until breakfast the next morning
/r/seduction04/07/11 09:46 PM
1

"hey, im afc21300"
/r/seduction28/06/11 07:24 AM
-5

but its true. :/
/r/MensRights20/06/11 03:28 PM
5

Probably that she stays close, or comes closer.
/r/seduction31/03/11 07:03 AM
1

Meh, that website is filled full of hate. They seriously don't have anything nice to say about anyone. I was actually curious about that site too, but when every single thread has curses and insults on people they don't know and have never wronged them, I'm just not going to read it.
/r/seduction25/03/11 03:45 PM
2

In relation with your number 2, some people will have better results just getting tipsy. Its all personal preference, but getting just to the tipsy point is the best place for me.
/r/seduction07/03/11 12:20 AM
7

I want to be the leader of a large, fun, social group of people at my college. I also want to meet lots of intelligent, fun women and date some of them.
/r/seduction25/02/11 03:58 AM
1

That's how the community grew up, is with those terms. It also makes crystal clear what is going on in the field report.
/r/seduction25/02/11 02:03 AM
2

ephebophile! I regularly keep my harems within my reach after they get done with school.
/r/seduction24/02/11 01:50 AM
3

teh troll
/r/seduction24/02/11 01:26 AM
6

I like your post and enjoyed your analysis.
/r/seduction24/02/11 01:11 AM
1

Probably some tight game, but this inner game is better than that.
/r/seduction15/02/11 05:43 PM
2

lol, what the fuck is your problem dude? Being completely rude to someone on the internet is just utterly idiotic. Posters on /r/seddit should be above this; this is child shit man. Edit: Oh wait, /r/seddit comment troll/hater LOL
/r/seduction12/02/11 06:35 AM
0

I just wouldn't have taken that comment lightly. That accepting of that comment just screams low status.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 05:15 AM
2

Actually, what I saw was a man on national television verbally acknowledging his status as a male was low. Now if someone said that to me, I wouldn't let that slide.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 05:13 AM
1

When seddit says looks matter, it is about taking care of yourself and wearing nice clothes :)
/r/seduction31/01/11 05:54 AM
4

Dude I rock a four incher when hard. You just have to live through it man, you can't change it. I make up for it by using my fingers like a beast though :D
/r/seduction26/01/11 01:54 PM
1

I always have a smirk on my face :)
/r/seduction13/01/11 07:49 AM
1

I used to be before I learned how to do it myself, back in AFC days
/r/seduction03/01/11 07:40 PM
1

Uh, yes it is.
/r/seduction02/01/11 02:37 AM
6

Vicky Cristina Barcelona
/r/seduction05/12/10 06:45 PM
1

Dude, I feel ya. The other night I was about to get some from my gf when I couldnt get it up in her mouth :/. I was dead tired from doing land navigation in a fucking forest the whole day. Lol, she went down on me, and I went soft, I was like wtf. Shit happens.
/r/seduction22/09/10 01:40 AM
2

What? There is no indication at all of her even being tipsy. He also used only one opener he didn't come up with himself, the pretend gf one. Having a bad morning manb?
/r/seduction25/07/10 04:27 PM
1

I'll check it out, thanks for the recommendation! Lol, this is probably the most I've posted in a forum in a while. Awesome :D, hehe
/r/seduction10/11/09 02:09 AM
1

Haha, this site is awesome. Thanks.
/r/seduction10/11/09 01:41 AM
1

Thanks! In all actuality I have searched a few times, but I end up on those industry sites where there's a block of text, a testimonial, then a link to buy something...then it repeats a few times. I am just curious how to get all started. I normally do get anxious when talking to complete strangers, my heart beats rapidly, and I sweat. I also speak fast...however I do work to keep these things from worrying me, and I've been reading up on body language and posture. Well, good luck with life! :)
/r/seduction10/11/09 01:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter