TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheUniqueProperty Archive

View 2 posts and 78 comments by TheUniqueProperty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nudes? Why would I give a shit? I doubt any given woman's vagina is so special they'd change the world by putting pictures of it on the internet. If anything we need to relax on the puritanical obsession with nudity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 08:29 PM
6

I'd say that depends on what you define as success. Personally I'd have a hard time calling having a bunch of sugar babies success. An ugly woman still has a theoretical shot to find a good partner who values their company.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 07:50 AM
7

In what way is it a death sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 06:37 AM
1

Giving it thought, I can't really find much to quibble with. I stand by my statement, but acknowledge it isn't really an objection.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 01:13 AM
1

That's still acting in self-interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 05:49 PM
2

It's the fault of our epistemological faculties that we don't comprehend humans as complete beings rather than as components of our internal narrative, serving a role dictated by how we interpret our experiences with them. The whole objectification discussion focuses on a small facet of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/20 03:06 AM
1

Also I think I'm too old for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:58 PM
1

Oh, I think you initially got autocorrected. Yeah, sort of. It's a fairly casual relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 05:17 PM
1

Huh? I mean I don't look down on people I fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 01:05 AM
1

I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 10:49 PM
1

I'll just go back in time and undo all that trauma and social exclusion, then I'll get some new genetics so I can be good looking. No big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 03:30 AM
2

I've been having a bad day, so I wasn't entirely sincere earlier. You're right, cultivating virtue has its own perks. However it does seem to be fairly useless in dating. Countless manchild fuckboys have no problems in this regard. It's not that it can't help in dating (I'd wager it helps both in filtering out shitty partners, and in handling the inevitable emotional lows) but if you're having difficulties getting a partner at all, it'll probably do jack and shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 10:12 PM
2

That's fine, but it still means character's basically superfluous. If you don't have looks, you can try to foster character until the sun burns out, but you'll still be effectively a half-man in this realm. I think being unhappy about that is warranted. As for Meek and others in this category: They are exceptions and they are not representive for the average Joe (m/f/w) Pardon? I'm not sure I get you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:58 PM
3

But that's not the case at all. You said it yourself, there are people out there that will happily overlook even grievous failings of virtue so long as you've got looks. So virtue essentially doesn't matter, it's a lot of work for no benefit as you'll get the same result without it. Being nice is not the bare minimum, there are countless pieces of shit doing just fine in this regard. Also god forbid a man be kind of meek, fuck those guys for dealing with trauma or social exclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:28 PM
2

So, essentially, character doesn't fucking matter. Which is why philosophers have been trying to convince us virtue is its own reward since 350 bc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 07:35 PM
1

Hello, yes, I would like some proofs, plz.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 06:59 PM
2

That doesn't seem to me like it would demonstrate anything useful in this thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 06:45 PM
1

It's a theoretical interpretive framework. It's more like meta-science. It stands out only because we rarely bother to question our default Cartesian assumptions about psychology. Of course, one can take issue with the hypothesises and conclusions. But the fact is our psychology is a product of our brain, which is a product of evolution. When Galileo couldn't prove heliocentrism, the sun was still the center of our solar system.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 06:44 PM
1

As far as I've read, they're pretty quick to advise against the naturalistic fallacy. Something being natural doesn't mean it's good.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 06:38 PM
1

The basic premise of evolutionary psychology is very obviously true if you think the brain and the mind are in any way connected. I think it catches as much flak as it does entirely because it's an attack on the Tabula Rasa that's so central to Liberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:06 AM
1

That's not what they claim at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 04:04 AM
3

I'd sooner take the beating, at least there's dignity in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 02:16 AM
3

Both are fine. You shouldn't be required to degrade yourself for the amusement of others to avoid being degraded by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 01:57 AM
1

Simply put, I'd rather be sexless the rest of my life than have a partner fuck me for any surreptitious motive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 01:52 AM
1

I'm not actually that struck on the idea of sex robots, but I think the question would be if the malfunctions happened at a lower rate than the various shit a biological partner could throw at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 01:42 AM
5

Wow, I actually felt a little anger at that prospect and I'm not even a short dude. You should not be obligated to mock yourself because of others, everyone should be able to live with dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 01:39 AM
1

I'm not going to tell others how to conduct their relationships, but the idea just doesn't sit right with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 12:19 AM
1

Maybe I'm just childish, but the idea of "maintenance sex" just does not sit right with me. I'd rather do without it, personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 12:17 AM
1

I never said that's never the case. My thoughts on the matter go as follows, in those circumstances, the sex is at least partially a means to the end that is affection, rather than an end in an of itself. You could argue that the transaction then is affection for sex, not in the traditional formulation of an exchange of goods, but in the sense that what is ultimately desired is affection, and sex is just part of how it's attained. If the affection could be acquired without the sex, would the sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/20 12:15 AM
1

Why are you going on about fairness? I think unfairness enters into the picture only in the sense that life itself is unfair, not in the sense of it being contrary to some quality of universal fairness. Yes, yes, there's no ethical consumption under capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 07:10 PM
3

Come now. This is just a symptom.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 07:03 PM
3

I didn't mean to suggest men only get into relationships only for sex. We all get lonely and companionship is desirable. I also don't think it's not fair that some men can't get casual sex; one deserves only what they can get. Don't be so presumptuous, it's not polite. I think you've basically just ignored my point in favor of arguing with some specter of a red piller. I'm not a red-piller. I'm someone examining my own thoughts on sexual relationships and the motives involved. Also prostitution …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 04:11 AM
2

If I was short of enthusiastic? Hard to say. As I feel right now (tired and headachy) I'd go with no. I think I'd have a hard time performing if I wasn't enthusiastic about the act. I think you're putting an unnecessarily negative spin on this. I don't want to police her thoughts, I just don't want to fuck her if she's not enthusiastic about the prospect. It's not a large coercive element, but I did say it was only a minor element. I'd be willing to bet the displeasurable element of their relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 04:03 AM
0

Stability I'd imagine. My point isn't that commitment or long-term relationships are bad, or not in men's interests, but that the requirement of a relationship being tied to sex introduces some ugly complexities to the act's motivations that I'm not entirely sure I'm comfortable with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:18 AM
1

I didn't say that couldn't be the case. But if they'll only fuck you if you put in the work to establish a relationship, or fuck you as part of maintaining that relationship, it suggest that fucking is a means rather than an end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:07 AM
1

To me there's nothing really comparable to sex in its intimacy and vulnerability. I wouldn't want my partner to have sex with me if they were anything short of enthusiastic, and I wouldn't want them to expect anything else from me. Now as for what enters one's mind, we don't really have a clear picture of our own motives; conscious experience is a very small portion of the processes that guide our lives. So the fact something doesn't enter one's mind doesn't mean it's not still a factor. These a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 03:04 AM
2

I hate to admit it, but I think the "alpha fux or nothing" guys have a point. I don't particularly buy the alpha/beta dichotomy (most dichotomies are either not actually opposites or represent a spectrum rather than a dichotomy), but there seems to be a type that regularly enjoys non-commital sex and if you aren't this type, you won't. This means that for many men, sex within a relationship is their option. Now this isn't terrible exactly, but it does mean the motive for sex becomes less clear. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 01:00 AM
1

Unless you're engaging in strictly structured dialectic (even then...) all debate is just a clash of rhetoric and power. This effect is only magnified in mixed group spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 12:26 AM
1

Reminds me of the anxiety of choice so central to existentialist thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 12:24 AM
1

Nothing suits the fetus since it has neither reason nor will (well, no more will than an object). As for suiting the parent, carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term can be a deeply traumatic experience. I can't fucking fathom how much I'd hate having to carry something in me that I don't want and then having to birth it; that's straight-up body horror.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 04:23 AM
1

If the baby's already around and you've accepted you're not up to the task, it can be a responsible choice. I'd still say it's less responsible than an abortion in many cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 03:45 AM
1

It's true. I just feel that raising a child has especially severe consequences if someone isn't up to the task, and sometimes the responsible action is to admit that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 05:46 PM
1

It's only a good thing to put on someone who can handle it. There are many people who can't be trusted with a houseplant, let alone a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/20 03:15 AM
2

A life isn't intrinsically valuable, nor is a fetus an autonomous life. What matters in human existence is the unique subjective experience, but as far as I'm concerned even that doesn't trump a woman's bodily autonomy. Well that's pretty sad. Shame on them. They suck, but they're hardly unique. I don't celebrate death, I just don't think life is inherently worth living. Besides, these cases wouldn't be victims of life, they're victims of poverty and damaged psychologies. It's pointless to teach…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 11:37 PM
2

Well thanks, but I'm not sure what you're saying "no" to here. I come from an abusive background as well, but here I am. So you'd rather more people be subjected to that hell than have people get abortions? What the actual fucking fuck dude? Having kids didn't make my parents more responsible; if anything it made them worse. Whether they "will fuck" or not, it's their job to mitigate risk to themselves. If they don't, then they're participating in a cause and effect relationship, and there will …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 10:37 PM
3

Sure, but part of the material reality is that now they have a kid and they're going to have to become more mature and responsible, because they aren't allowed to simply let their children die, or "take them out back" and make them disappear. You're one of the posters here that even in the long period where I just lurked, I rather liked, so I won't laugh at you. But as someone from an abusive background: no. The other part of "material reality" is acknowledging that sex is reproduction. Very few…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 09:05 PM
5

Holy men and philosophers have been preaching that business for as long as humans have been able to flap their gums, and sometimes it has even stuck, but fine ideals won't change material reality. The material reality is that if someone who isn't ready to have a kid can't get an abortion, they're going to have a kid they're not ready for. The adoption system also isn't ready to handle a surplus of extra kids, so it's not s replacement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 07:40 PM
13

Presumably, a man who can find multiple sexual partners won't have as much difficulty finding a desirable romantic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 06:30 PM
2

Why do you assume it'd be them leaving? It's not that you don't have business protecting your assets. It's thst it's hypocritical to demand they have no material concerns in this arrangement when you yourself want to dictate this arrangement based on material concerns. There aren't any unreasonable legal demands in marriage. You split shared assets you attained during your union, you support kids you made and you can't dump someone you hibituated to a shared lifestyle back into destitution. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 06:36 PM
2

Like any call to respect a pure ideal at personal risk, I feel Michel de Montaigne covers this well: "I hate to have people order us to keep our minds in the clouds while our bodies are at the table." Your love is not so valuable as to warrant risking destitution, nobody's is. Besides, what business do you have chastising them for thinking about money over love, when you want them to risk everything for the privilege of being your live-in bangmaid (first time that's felt appropriate) because you…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:19 AM
2

Then you accept the risk of splitting assets and paying alimony and child support if you divorce. You can't very well expect someone to be a part of your life and then kick their ass out to be destitute because you expected them to not have a career for your sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 01:35 AM
6

Are there any good cultural archetypes of women that refuse to grow up?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 01:50 AM
5

We're not meant to be happy. If happiness is the aim of human existence, we've done nothing but fail. That said, I agree, for the most part. I take the following from this community: •Humans are animals, and as much as we'd pretend otherwise, sex and romance are not primarily matters of the mind and spirit and involve elements of our person that are essentially superficial. •Do what you can to be attractive. It will go a long way in making your dating life easier and more satisfying. •Carefully …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 12:44 AM
2

Could be a matter of class blindness. I'm from a lower-class background and worked a lot in bars. It's been a recurrent archetype in my life. Generally male promiscuity is not associated with favorable character traits, at least in my experience. Usually disloyalty, immaturity and single-mindedness.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 07:41 PM
5

In this case, it is in a woman's own words. This isn't my only experience seeing women describe promiscuous men as losers, fuckboy isn't a term of endearment. From my own experience, I haven't seen many slayers that were "losers" in the conventional sense, but that's because the archetype tends to exclude by definition fit, attractive, charming men (it tends to be more Kirk Vanhouten or the comic book guy). But I have seen a lot of slayers who didn't have much else going for them. The archetype …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 07:18 PM
3

Based on the comment in the OP, far as I can tell. In which the man had only proved himself "not a murderer" which isn't really the same as almost murderous. Also the second part where she says they're "just above the losers not safe enough to have sex with" which to me is basically calling them losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 06:51 PM
1

We assume that based on the quoted statement in the OP. The repeated sentiment in the previous thread that spurred this one. I'm not factoring in alcohol or pressure, I don't think they're a fair standard, only the comparison to an enthusiastic casual encounter (in fact I do use the words enthusiastic consent). That's in the context of a controlled experimental environment, not the uncertain market of dating. From my standpoint, and I'd wager the standpoint of a lot of men, having sex early is b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 06:35 PM
3

At no point did I say long term relationships are a bad idea or that more sex is being had with casual flings. It matters, because it raises the question of why they had to wait, put in shows of commitment, emotional labor, etc., when some knob-end that the woman doesn't even like got to smash immediately. The obvious answer that takes the least assumptions is that she didn't consider him sexually appealing enough to warrant the risk. Now I'm aware that it's more complicated than that, but the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 05:31 AM
4

What gives you the faintest impression I'm advocating sugar babies, or any kind of paid intercourse? Like, you pulled that shit straight out of the aether. I'm saying very simply that quick, enthusiastic sex constitutes "better treatment" in the minds of most men than being expected to wait and jump through a bunch of hoops to prove yourself virtuous enough to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 04:42 AM
1

I really don't think they do. There are many things of the female experience that I know I can't truly grasp because I can't experience them personally. I'd imagine the same applies of women and elements of the male experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 02:27 AM
1

I think that's very unfair. I'd wager it's mostly just a matter of different priorities. The impression I get is that many women see commitment and its challenges as the proverbial big leagues, with sex being anywhere from a pleasurable diversion to a joyless duty pursued to maintain the relationship. It seems many of the women here just have trouble grasping what a big deal sex is to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 02:19 AM
3

I'm not a big fan of casual sex, but I'd like to think I'd maintain the same standards of attraction and character regardless. I don't fuck people I don't find attractive or likeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 10:46 PM
4

I'm sorry to hear that's your experience. My suggestion would be to look for men who neither take special pride in their conquests nor are especially desperate for sex (this doesn't necessarily mean overlooking inexperienced men, just try to find one who is relatively self-sufficient) as both strike me as more liable to use a woman as a means to an end. I'd also consider being cautious of (though not necessarily writing off entirely) spaces like bars or tinder, where even ordinary men might just…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 07:20 PM
20

You have a very strange definition of treating better. Do I treat my guests better when I show them trust and comfortable laxity, getting quickly to hospitality and entertainment or when I treat them with suspicion and demand they prove to me that they can be trusted in my home?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 07:09 PM
5

I don't think it's the majority. Many men in my experience treat their long term partners very well, often placatingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 07:04 PM
18

I'm saying that defining "getting treated better" as "doing something fun and pleasurable with minimal investment of time, resources and emotional labor rather than investing time, resources and emotional labor to not do this fun and pleasurable thing" is just pathetic. Fixed that for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:59 PM
16

Defining "treated better" as "getting fucked more" is a really sad standard. This is however something men care deeply about. So you're probably not going to convince many men to change this view. Sex isn't as big of a deal for me and I'd still rather just have some casual fun than be expected to jump through hoops to prove I'm a "good" man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:56 PM
6

So you're claiming that every man treats every stranger on the street better than every woman they've slept with. Do you realize how damaged that sounds?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:51 PM
1

Wouldn't that outcome still mean dating is rough, since they'd not only be competing with some truly impressive men for a fairly small pool of women (assuming they're concerned with their partner's appearance)?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 07:36 PM
5

I think tensions appear worse on the internet because there's a lot more people on the internet than there were. On the note of gender relations, I think #metoo has wound up being somewhat contentious. I'm here for a combination of entertainment and as a means of working through my own perspective on these matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 07:10 PM
3

A short dude can make a fine member of an armored vehicle crew. The collapse of a society would not be an opportunity to become Conan.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 04:04 AM
2

As I said, I can't really throw stones on that front. Having never been very lucky in romance, but never having been entirely without options (terrible options are still options) I know damn well I'll refuse an option if I'm not actually interested in them, and I don't hold that against women. I just think it's sad (I need to be clear, I do not mean pathetic) that people, including myself, will opt for loneliness. I think a lot of this is just the feeling of hopeless futility a lot of men wind u…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 01:04 AM
4

I hate to pull "but it happens to men too" but it's not as though society's any kinder to men that just give up. They tend to assume they just couldn't hack it, and their failings stem from some grievous, often moral, personal flaw (this seems to be the general assumption with the vast majority of men that spend a long period single). It seems to be a bias against single people is pervasive, and although its expressions might be gendered, the basic prejudice is not. For my part, I'd say it's a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 12:16 AM
1

As subjectively isolated individuals, we are all fundamentally alone. However, we're continually experiencing (albeit subjectively filtered) and are affected by the exterior world. In this sense, there could be said that there's no ontological divide between us and the exterior world, only a phenomenological one (I am just more matter in a material universe, and fundamentally no different from any other surrounding me, it is my recognition of my distinctness that makes it so). As such, a degree …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/20 07:21 PM
2

As I said, I think there's only a grain of truth to it that's overstated. A good job is probably a significant factor in securing a marriage prospect, if only because that shit's expensive. I do think the standards to be considered genuinely desirable (distinct from what it takes to be able to get the interest of at least one woman) are stricter for men, owing to the probability that we're polygynous (though I think people overstate the significance of that as well, as I have my doubts monogamy …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 07:46 PM
0

I think the argument is that men are expected to look particularly good and be exceptionally good at flirting and have a nice job. Of which I think there is only a grain of truth to this (being that we're likely a polygynous species which means the standards would be more severe for men and ability to provide is part of mate selection).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 07:36 PM
1

I agree with the general drift of your post, and it reflects my own rejections of both conservative and progressive views of sexual values through history. However, I will say that the sexual activity of the pagan Greco-Romans is a very bad example. They had huge hangups about female sexuality, and valued female virginity and fidelity highly. You can see elements of this in Homer's epics, how differently the sexual activities of the male characters are treated from those of female characters. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/20 12:58 AM
1

I think you might have cause and effect switched. While I don't doubt that these communities can exacerbate such feelings, I feel the initial draw is the presence of the fundamental, driving fear of being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 03:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter