TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

The_Pringles_Man Archive

View 1 post and 289 comments by The_Pringles_Man on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
71

DiscriminationThe_Pringles_Man/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:34 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

and we live in a small ecological niche. Lol what.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/21 11:35 PM
1

Ah - that's US. I'm referring to the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 09:32 AM
5

Sex offender register for someone who performed a sexual assault.....well, yeah - obviously.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 10:13 PM
1

Not sure that's entirely true...have you got examples?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 10:12 PM
1

It's considered sexual assault in the UK - and yes, you'd go on the register for that.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 10:12 PM
4

The records will show that yeah, but from my understanding with the way DBS works now there'll be a disclosure officer of some sorts who will review the request for info on these chaps and will decide what needs disclosing and what doesn't. So if they apply to be teachers in a school, the data manager will quite rightly not disclose this as it was discovered they were completely innocent. Whilst it will remain on the PNC (Police National Computer) - where it shows as 'NFA' (No Further Action) - …
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/21 02:48 PM
7

They're kept on a VP (vulnerable person) wing in prisons in the UK. They're not usually forced to mix with the general prison population.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/21 02:46 PM
2

I don't read any of those so I've no idea. The lack of good men's magazines doesn't mean a newspaper for women shouldn't focus on women's stories though.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 07:05 PM
1

there is absolutely Zero value in "that is offensive" or "I am offended" when you are having a debate or discussion or lecture such as this setting. ​ Always reminds me of this....
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/20 02:23 PM
11

It's from a newspaper that is specifically about female issues. Would you be upset if a newspaper about male issues wanted to write about a male death?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:15 PM
12

In this case, the article comes from The Lily which is a women's newspaper and it is unsurprising that it has a story about women. Yup - this. It's not a big shock that a newspaper about X runs a story pertaining to X.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:14 PM
2

I would say being murdered by your parter constitutes domestic violence. It fits the definition here in the UK and I'm pretty sure it'll fit the US definition too. You can't get more violent than killing someone.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 09:16 PM
2

It says first jailed....which is incorrect anyway https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/peter-hedley-murder-clare-humble-9310915 Quick Google...I'm sure there are many more.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:02 PM
1

There's that male privilege. The privilege that large numbers of people think they can use you as a punch bag.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/20 07:02 PM
5

"First woman in UK to be charged with domestic violence was 2018!" That's not what the article says.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:53 PM
1

Also, try, fail, try fail, is not necessarily good all the time. If you are like me, who tried much harder than my peers in matters of relationships, and always failed, then there is mistake somewhere else. I think generally success is born from failure. Most things worth achieving are done with failure along the route. I'm not saying try the exact same thing - I'm saying try again, learn from your mistake and give it a go. Each time you fail - learn from it. ​ Trying to smash yourself against a…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:44 PM
1

There's definitely a time and a place for being told to just man up. We've all met people who really - just needed to man the fuck up and get on with it. Sometimes the problem is everyone around them pandering to them, and nobody telling them No - just deal with your damn problem. The problem arises when someone's answer to everything is "man up" - there are absolutely times and situations where "man up" isn't helpful. You need to judge each situation by it's merits and not have a one size fits …
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:21 AM
7

I’m not really sure why everyone downvoted me Because people are stupid and easily 'triggered' if they get a sniff of anything that sounds like it's veering away from the 'accepted' line. I've upvoted you - there's never anything wrong with asking for a source.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 06:36 PM
4

"2018...motherfuckers like this wanna act like they can do whatever the fuck they want" - says the arrested lady. Oddly enough, the attitude she's complaining about is exactly the type of attitude shown by the original girl. * I'll put my feet on the seat if I want to - fuck everyone else. * I won't get them down when I'm told - fuck you. * No, I won't get off the train - fuck you. * No I won't cooperate with you - I'll physically resist you - fuck you. ​ Play silly games, win silly prizes.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/20 12:24 AM
7

Like, pepper spray?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 11:25 PM
6

I'm a cop - albeit in the UK - and unfortunately there's plenty of people who have a few lines and want to fight everyone. I'm sure it doesn't happen for everyone - but I've lost count of how many 'cokeheads' I've had to fight with (on duty of course).
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 11:10 PM
4

That cop was scared to do his job. It seemed more like he was giving her the chance to back down / waiting to see if she moved into a less dangerous environment to fight in - like the pavement. ​ I counted 5 different voices telling him to just fuck her up and get the mess out of the street. I'm a Police Officer in the UK - and personally, I couldn't care if there's 50 voices telling me to "fuck them up" - it's my use of force, and my decision. Those 50 voices won't be in court supporting me if …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 11:09 PM
11

Cocaine.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 11:06 PM
1

It was a decent choice.... PAVA/CS - Chance she runs off into traffic screaming - she's already nearly got hit by a few cars. Taser - Potential to sustain significant head injury on the concrete
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 11:05 PM
2

Concrete + Head hitting from a height = potential fractured skull / brain injury.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/20 11:04 PM
1

Great - me neither. This post isn't about us then, clearly. Well it clearly is as it says "Dear all men" - not "Dear some men" - not "Dear men who fit this criteria" it says "Dear all men".
/r/MensRights22/02/20 04:51 PM
6

I know this might sound bad but these guys honestly deserve to be ashamed. You're absolutely right - it does sound bad. ​ Many of these victims will have children with these women, and their finances are often such that they are utterly financially dependent on remaining with their partner. A conviction for assault can result in their partner losing their employment, which in turn could result in things like losing their home. There are lots of reasons people don't speak out - and saying "grow a…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 01:48 PM
2

This was posted two days ago. It seems to get posted on here fairly regularly.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:26 PM
1

Firstly, that isn't true - it's 3x. Secondly - you're acknowledging that girls do get expelled from school - contradicting your claim that "if a girl did this, nothing would happen" Thirdly - you've not provided anything that substantiates that a girl, in identical circumstances wouldn't get expelled. ​ Again - this isn't anything to do with gender.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 07:49 PM
1

Proof?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 05:15 PM
1

Some actual context to this story: ​ Basically - this child has a long history of being violent and attacking his teachers, and causing damage to property, which began as far back as his time in nursery. He's now five and the final strraw was; an incident in which he kicked and punched teaching staff, tipped over chairs and a table, and pulled displays off a wall. The parents claim no knowledge of why he behaves like this. The local council have managed to secure him a place at a specialist scho…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 05:00 PM
1

They have to consider many children in the whole class. Yup - this.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:49 PM
3

“Violent” behavior is boyish Sorry that's insufficient. There's a huge sliding scale - on the one end you have play fighting - on the other end you have causing significant and serious injury intentionally. As there's no context given - I've no way of knowing if this boy has just been engaging in a bit of light hearted rough and tumble in the playground - or trying to stab a classmate in the eye with scissors...which I am sure you'd agree can't just be casually dismissed with a "boys will be boy…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 02:48 PM
10

There's no context to this. Is this in fact a war on boys - or is that particular boy just a really naughty shit that none of us would want in our child's class?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:53 PM
4

Not in the UK it isn't...don't know about Cyprus.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:11 PM
15

That is a staggeringly one-sided and biased article. It doesn't mention any of the issues with the investigation and prosecution - such as: being denied access to a lawyer being denied access to a translator the crime scene not being held for long enough (the room where the rape allegedly happened) the phones not being downloaded for the men when they were arrested (which would be standard practice in just about every rape investigation) ​ I happen to think - as a gut feeling - that she probably…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:09 PM
2

So, what's the solution? Well, experts suggest women should work shorter weeks to allow for the unpaid work they do, such as domestic chores, which is on average about 4.5 hours every day, the study found. 1) Women already do work shorter weeks - the average working week for women is shorter both in Europe and in the US 2) There's absolutely no fucking way that even a significant number of women are doing anything close to a full shift in work and then '4.5hours per day' of domestic chores - I m…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:13 AM
1

I've asked you to provide evidence to back up your assertion. You've repeatedly failed to do so. This isn't hard to understand but you are still struggling. I'd love to continue this battle of wits with you but you've demonstrated repeatedly that you are indeed quite unarmed. Night.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 08:15 PM
1

See? Thick.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 07:36 PM
1

You've not read what I've said - have you? You're not arguing in bad faith - just thick.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 05:24 PM
1

I think you've consistently demonstrated we have VERY different ideas of what constitutes 'evidence' - you seem to think evidence consists of making a claim, and providing something that doesn't prove your claim. You also seem to think assumptions are sufficient. I'm not really sure how else I could explain this to you - you're either arguing in bad faith at the moment, or you're just not capable of grasping fairly simple concepts.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 05:01 PM
1

So you don't have any evidence? Just assumption? ​ Her defense team believed the video proved she lied. A bold claim - and one you've failed to substantiate. I have a funny feeling your next reply will equally fail to substantiate your claim.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:15 PM
1

That's a long way of saying "No, I don't have a source that her defence team believed the video proved she lied." Do you have a source evidencing the fact that her defence team believed the video proved she lied? You've provided evidence that her legal team said it would affect her mental health - absolutely nothing evidencing they believed the video proved her account to be false.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 02:34 PM
19

Look at what he says - not who he is.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:07 AM
1

Can you provide the source for "her defence team believed the video proved she lied?"
/r/MensRights06/01/20 07:55 AM
2

You've taken a huge leap and decided that the video proves her guilt. It doesn't. 1) We have not seen the video. 2) Allegedly the male's phones were not downloaded - therefore there is no way of knowing if any video presented to the authorities by the males or their representatives is in fact unedited. 3) The video likely does not show the entire encounter - you will not be (or should not be) particularly shocked to know that events can happen after a video stops recording, as well as before. So…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 10:09 PM
1

Sorry I'm not sure why you feel the need to post the same thing in response to my comments on two different threads? I'll copy and paste what I said in the other thread: ​ Thankfully, in my country we usually convict on a lot more than this. ​ PS I'm not having the same conversation with you twice.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:07 PM
1

Thankfully, in my country we usually convict on a lot more than this.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 07:48 PM
5

And make sure those accused of rape have access to all those things as well. Right now, they often don’t. Well yes, obviously they should. The investigative process is not about getting the suspect charged/jailed - it's about gathering the evidence...even the evidence that supports the accused. ​ Where is the feminist outcry over these travesties of justice? No idea. I'm not agreeing with feminists - I'm saying in this story here it's not cut and dry because the Cypriot authorities have allegedl…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:07 PM
2

So what’s the solution? To have one of those proposed special rape courts presided over only by women? How on earth did you leap to that based on my posts? Isn't it obvious? ​ Her lawyer claims she was forced into signing a confession Don't let people sign a confession without a lawyer present to ensure they are doing it without having been coerced. So that the confession will stand up in court and so that nobody can say it's not valid. A forensic pathologist says her injuries are consistent wit…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:55 PM
1

Verdict against whom? If you mean her - it evidently wasn't as she was found guilty. If you mean against her alleged rapists - the verdict would be Not Guilty (unless Cypriot law holds a specific 'insufficient evidence' verdict I am not aware of??). In any event - nobody can say with any certainty whether she was raped or not given what a shitty job it appears the Cypriot authorities did of the investigation. Nobody has had any real justice here.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:30 PM
25

She was convicted - but there are some issues.... ​ Her lawyer claims she was forced into signing a confession A forensic pathologist says her injuries are consistent with rape The location of the allegedly rape was apparently not held as a crime scene The original defendant's didn't have their phones downloaded as part of the investigation She was apparently not given access to a lawyer. She was apparently not given access to a translator. If she's proven to have lied, and there was no rape - a…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:40 PM
9

Didn't need this fucking study. We all know it. If you present an argument without evidence people can quite fairly dismiss it without evidence. If you know you're stronger than me - you can't expect me to take your word for it....
/r/MensRights04/01/20 10:09 AM
1

I think culturally we've had this "protect the women because they are weak, vulnerable, virtuous and lovely" thing for so long that at this point it's kind of hardwired into us. Results like this aren't at all surprising.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 10:08 AM
4

What
/r/MensRights04/01/20 09:32 AM
3

Man, the Police in Spain do not fuck around.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/19 01:12 PM
2

They're hitting in the fleshy parts from the look of it - which will be as per training. It doesn't tend to do much if the target is pumped with adrenaline. They sure as hell feel it later though.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/19 01:11 PM
3

Paedophiles are mentally ill, putting them in prison most likely won’t help them, some form of therapy could. In England and Wales it's actually prison where they get the best therapy.... odd really! ​ If she acted on her urges, no matter how wrong they are, but didn’t directly harm children (let’s assume she downloaded the pics)/ sexually assaulted children, a warning is adequate measure, this may stop her from acting in any fashion on her paedophilia (as a kind of wake-up call). Sadly it won't…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:44 PM
1

No - in England and Wales most 'first time' offenders for IIOC (indecent images of children) typically avoid jail, instead receiving a suspended custodial sentence. This includes men. She hasn't had any preferential treatment on the basis of her gender - this is just how the system operates.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:19 AM
1

I'm not sure comprehension is your strong point....
/r/MensRights29/09/19 09:10 AM
2

The head of the human rights council is Saudi Arabia for fuck's sake It literally isn't. ​ Why are their no other climate science models? Why would there be others? If the current research and studies all clearly points to one model - there's going to be just one model. I mean, if you've got a different one by all means suggest it. ​ If the future of humanity is supposed to be at stake here then why is it that there is only one group of people supposedly doing 'reliable' research on this? Litera…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 01:06 AM
1

Yes I read all of your posts - and the bit I quoted is the bit that stands out.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 01:01 AM
2

Again, I don't give a fuck about the science ...and that's where we stop listening to you on the topic of "Climate Change" - thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 11:53 PM
2

What does this have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights28/09/19 10:10 PM
9

The Daily Mail doesn't tend to report as female 'rapes' as rapes because in the Criminal Law of England and Wales a female can't rape a male. They can aid and abet however.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:19 PM
1

The female players start with more cash and get more cash for passing go.... Not sure that's the right message is it? "Look girls,if we handicap the men and give you a helping start you can compete/win!!!"
/r/MensRights13/09/19 02:00 PM
59

This. I've arrested plenty of women. Some of those women have been absolutely outraged that I've gone on to (gently) slap a set of handcuffs on them and have tried to fight. It always amazes me the outrage/surprise some of them exhibit when they end up on the floor. It's like it just doesn't compute.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 12:10 AM
107

Double standard. Nothing new (sadly).
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:30 PM
2

Ugh - right in the feels.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/19 12:14 PM
1

People often forget how a bad fall or a good punch may cripple, get you in coma or kill you. I get that but I'm talking about an occasion when you genuinely know that that's not a real risk such is the imbalance of strength/ability. ​ Knowing you can take it easy with people in a fight is the stuff of movies. Fighting is dangerous stuff. Yeah I agree with you for most encounters - but depending on the individual there are times when, you can't quite "take it easy" but you know you've got it in t…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 02:02 PM
6

very quickly take off one's shirt and/or pants and wrap around one's arms. Dude, most of the time by the time you see the knife they're pretty close - you won't have time to strip off your clothes.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 11:13 AM
9

This is how a real man or woman handles knife situation. From experience, running isn't always possible - i.e. if they're in the way of the only exit.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 11:12 AM
1

If a weaker guy attacked me and I couldn't get away, I'd hit back with all I had. If in that moment, you knew you didn't need to hit back with all you had - would you still hit back with everything? Let's say for example you're on a social night out - a guy who is clearly shorter, weaker - and quite drunk - starts giving you grief. He starts shoving you and no amount of you trying to calm things down and deescalation is working. Things suddenly get worse and he throws a wild punch at you. Perhap…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 11:08 AM
3

I feel like you should be able to replicate the force she uses but like not anymore than that It depends on the situation - escalation is often quite appropriate. If you're repeatedly slapping me hard I don't really see any reason why I should limit myself to slapping you in response. I mean, sure - ideally I should avoid elbow striking you to the nose - but I see no reason why I can't take you to the floor for example. A little escalation can end the situation quite quickly and keep you safer a…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 11:00 AM
5

A lot of people in this world would be better humans if they had caught a major asskicking at least once in their miserable lives. And there's a lot of people who catch a major asskicking who come back with a knife or a gun.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 10:56 AM
1

Are there exceptions? Sure, there are women that can throw a nasty punch, and in those situations when you feel endangered, go for it. You aren't going to always be able to tell just by looking at someone whether or not they are a threat to you. Doing 'the taste test' and letting them get into a position where they can strike you is a bit stupid - and a fantastic way to risk being injured.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 10:55 AM
1

Social services should (and probably are) getting involved if the mother openly admits she'll mistreat the baby because of its gender.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:56 AM
29

This is exactly right - if you're ever in trouble - you need to single people out.... good example: "YOU! WITH THE BLUE HAT! I need you to call an ambulance NOW! MAN WITH THE BRIEFCASE! COME HERE NOW! I need you to put pressure on this wound and stop the bleeding!" People are far more likely to assist than if you just shout "somebody help"
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:29 AM
1

I am astounded no one stepped up. As a Police Officer I am not astounded at all. Humans are fucking shit! A lot are - not all.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:27 AM
91

Probably a litigation thing. They don't want to be sued by an involved party who disputes he was bullied - putting it in quotations is akin to saying allegedly bullied.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:25 AM
7

To be fair - there may be no shelters where that person lives....
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:08 PM
2

Because people are entitled - everyone knows their rights but few seem to know their responsibilities
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/19 10:57 AM
1

People are not meant to hit the Police. Hit the Police, don't cry if you get hit back.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/19 08:45 AM
10

They have this whole thing about 'power' i.e. as men hold the power they can't be victims of sexism as it's about structures of power/oppression. Basically they've just re-defined the meaning of sexism to something that suits them and puts them in a position where they, by definition can't be the offenders, only the victims. It's complete and utter nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:37 PM
1

Oh that's easy. None. Next question please.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/19 12:07 PM
10

I hope he at least stood up and walked off afterwards? Why be in a relationship with someone who thinks it's ok to attack you?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:05 PM
5

Because he's a moron.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 06:32 PM
5

Even if not, they could have tested her in the first place by asking her out about several topics. Ok and assuming she had passed their test? Most people aren't going to admit they hate all men - to a company that sells gaming products, primarily aimed at men.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 07:09 PM
-2

Kind of inclined to agree with you. I can see why they've done it - the majority of their customer base will be guys - so it makes sense. But yeah, she was responding to quite a crass and rude comment, she was clearly annoyed and it comes across as a throwaway comment rather than a genuine and sincere belief. We've all said things we regret in the heat of the moment and really, what she said wasn't actually that bad in the context.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:56 PM
4

Did this lady have a history of such comments then?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:54 PM
15

Company hires girl. Girl says something anti-male. Company promptly fires girl and issues apology saying her views don't reflect theirs. I'm confused what they could have done differently here?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:52 PM
13

The significant majority of their consumers are men - so this makes sense from a financial point of view. To allow it would risk alienating a large number of their customers.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:50 PM
3

And they literally hop from one to the next. Week 1 - Gay Pride Whooo! Gay people! Buy our stuff Week 2 - Women's week Whooo! Women are AMAZING! Now buy our stuff Week 3 - Environment Day The planet is awesome. Let's save it together. Now buy our damn stuff Week 4 - Paralympic Games Disabled people are heroes - yey! Buy more stuff. Buy it now. ​ They don't care in the slightest.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:02 AM
3

Thing is - I imagine most beer drinkers just want to relax and drink a cold beer and switch off from the worries of the world...even if only for an hour or two. I'd find it quite tiresome to have something like this forced on me (even if the wage gap was a real 'thing').
/r/MensRights19/06/19 02:54 PM
7

What irritates me is that they don't actually say "Damn - you know what? We fucked up here. We had good intentions but yeah, you're right the way we executed it was wrong, it was discriminatory and we want to hold our hands up and apologise. We'll also give this guy right here £1,000 worth of free beer on top of the court settlement and we'll be donating some money to a men's charity" I'd take that all day long. We all make mistakes. It's the way they seem to just shrug it off - like they didn't…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:48 PM
8

Gay people aren't perverts....
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:34 PM
2

Meh - this one works both ways. Plenty of men run up huge debts and aren't entirely truthful with their other half. This is more of an 'asshole' thing, than a woman thing.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:04 PM
5

Certainly true of some women yeah. I think you definitely see it in those glossy women's mags - one page will be talking about body positivity and a picture of a 'larger' woman who is apparently brave and beautiful because she is morbidly obese and has opted to wear a skimpy swim costume and be photographed in it - the next page will be poking fun at Tom Cruise for having a bit of a gut.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:01 PM
6

Without saying enough to dox myself...I have previously worked with Julie Cooke in the Police - and I very much doubt you've summed up her thought process accurately. She's been at Cheshire Police for no time at all, and is quite reasonable, sensible and fair. One of the few "big bosses" I've met who I had confidence in. She will have played no part in this Clusterfuck- but now she works for Cheshire Police she's got to help unfuck it all.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:13 PM
1

A scrawl in the signature box isn't proof either....and we've got better things to do than pick some random person and try and frame them for a minor traffic violation - not to mention the 100% guarantee of being sacked and facing criminal charges if we intentionally falsify a ticket - and a real possibility of jail. So yeah, our word is proof.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/19 11:20 PM
3

In the UK it's kind of irrelevant if you sign. We just write REFUSED in the box. The fact we make a note that we issued you the ticket is sufficient proof you were given the ticket.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/19 10:07 PM
3

Oh yes it does.....
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/19 10:06 PM
2

You're only allowed to use 'Reasonable Bantz' - i.e. the lowest level of Bantz necessary to achieve the objective. If you use unreasonable Bantz you get complaints of Police Banter-tality.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/19 11:00 AM
10

Heartbreaking to read some of those. If you're going to send someone off to fight and kill - and pay them a pittance of a wage - you damn well should look after them when they get back.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:01 AM
1

The idea that men can't be victims seems to stem from a rather simplistic view that sexual / physical assaults involve Big Strong Person (man) attacking Poor Weak Person (woman). You see it in movies/TV - the cliched moment the dweeb jumps off the bar stool, runs at his nemesis and punches him to the chest in a flurry of punches and the other guy (whose huge) just takes the punches, looks at the dweeb who stops and gulps nervously and then punches the dweeb, knocking him down in one - crowd then…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 08:54 AM
8

The problem is there's a portion of people here who are just crazy and any outsiders popping in will remember those voices (and the fact those voices weren't challenged). I had some guy the other day seeming to argue that all/most women were raving feminists - which is just utter nonsense.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 08:48 AM
4

We mostly make do with foul language and top level 'Bantz'
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/19 08:44 AM
7

...Try being in the Police....
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/19 08:42 AM
1

Then explain what you mean. How many women do you think harbour these views? I've said most women are normal and hold normal views - you seem to be arguing against this -so clarify your position. Or alternately run away from the conversation.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 05:51 AM
1

Ok so in your world all/most women are raging feminazis and people like me who've not had this experience just haven't had an in-depth enough conversation and therefore don't know their 'real beliefs....Sorry but you sound a bit nuts.....I didn't miss the part where you said you talked to real women, I just don't actually believe you based on everything else you said. Unless by "talked to real women" you mean a very, very small social circle of perhaps a few dozen. Perhaps it's an American thing…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:46 PM
2

You and I must move in very different circles as I find most women to be fairly normal and unconcerned about modern feminism. Most women I meet believe there is a gender pay gap - namely that women are paid less for the same work - but revise that view once the complexities and variables are explained (which is fairly reasonable). Twitter/Reddit etc is always going to be a hotbed of nutters - but normal women working in normal jobs tend to be....well, normal.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:29 PM
1

So what is your position? That all or most women are raging feminists? Most women I've met don't have a clue about the duluth model.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:07 PM
1

And we didnt say take the beating heroically. Plenty of people have pretty much said that - there's 355 comments on this thread - not everything I've said is directed at you - if it was I'd have specified 'you.' Hne the gang attacks if u fight back the may/might/will stop. We said it depends on how vested they were. If its a rando educational beatdown and u fight back. Where is their incentive to continue ??? U aint teaching somebody anything if they are kicking ur ass. Unfortunately we live in …
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:41 PM
1

LoL u arent the only cop in this thread. I didn't say I was. And i bet i spent more time one on one with these shit heads than u have. I doubt it - but I'm not really bothered if you want to believe that. U work in the jail too ? Nope. Streets.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:38 PM
2

Plenty of women who are 'normal' and rational. Not all women are raging feminists who want to strip away your rights. Just go on a few dates, have some conversations - get to know them. If it isn't working out tell them and move on. I went on a date with a girl many years ago when I was a single man and she was fantastic - until date 3 or 4 when she dropped into the conversation she thought arranged marriages were great, didn't see a problem with the way women were treated in countries like Saud…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:50 AM
1

You bet wrong I'm afraid. I've investigated more fights than I could ever recall and plenty of them were involving a group on an individual and were random or had little to no reason - certainly no reason for the group to feel any investment in the assault. I have plenty of experience in this area - whereas i get the impression a lot of the comments here have no experience at all beyond a few dozen YouTube videos. If you're attacked by a group it's likely to get ugly quickly, and as I've already…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:30 AM
7

I wasn't aware a sports top meant you're allowed to be assaulted....
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:52 PM
2

It depends on the situation. I mean, firstly- most people will do ANYTHING to avoid a fight. Like 80-90% of people will bark but they won't bite unless they feel they have no option. That leaves 10 or 20% who may fancy a scrap. Of those, some won't feel the inclination and some will....some won't even see what happened....some will potentially look at you and not fancy their chances...others may see you're stood alone in the middle with your back exposed and hit you with a solid hook from your b…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:20 PM
2

Mine is 9.5 inches. When flaccid.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:04 PM
2

Yup this is exactly right!
/r/MensRights23/05/19 06:30 PM
4

True but if that's your plan - hope they aren't that invested in attacking you - you're probably fucked. You're far better off running away or not getting into that fight into the first place. You won't end up eating through a tube and having your eye sockets fractured. I investigated violent crimes in a busy city centre for a few years whilst I was in the CID...if you're attacked by a gang you rarely come off well, and there's absolutely no heroism or Man points won for getting the absolute fuc…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:07 PM
6

There seems to be a lot of Bruce Lee's about today judging by some of these people who think they could fight off multiple assailants simultaneously.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:57 PM
2

I doubt it.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:56 PM
1

Sadly, after years investigating and dealing with violent crime - no, it often doesn't. Heroic scenes where the hero fights back and fends off the larger crowd are usually reserved for movies and comics - not real life.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:55 PM
5

Yeah I think it's important not to draw huge generalisations - saying "Chicks are like this" is as bad as saying "All men are violent" - or "All men are bastards" - it's factually incorrect and doesn't really help.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:59 PM
3

From experience, most people don't get identified of CCTV alone. The woman who initially assaulted him, if she knows the person filming may get identified - but 8 random's jumping on you for fighting back, there's a good chance they won't be ID'd. Some do get ID'd sure - but I wouldn't fancy your odds.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:58 PM
6

A bold statement considering you know nothing about me.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:56 PM
1

Chicks are like this. Some chicks are like this. They get away with it, too. Some get away with it. Plenty don't.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:20 PM
1

I doubt they'll be kind enough to hang around or leave their details for you
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:18 PM
1

You can "aim where it hurts" all you want - you can "fight dirty" all you want but trust me you are going to get fucked up if there's a group of people attacking you.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:18 PM
1

That's male privilege right there. The privilege that 50% of the populace can assault you and expect a pass from others.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:17 PM
6

It does feel like this is the case. There's a double standard in that women can voice concern and are expected to be listened to, believed, taken seriously - and adaption to their concerns must then occur. Men voice concerns and not only is there no change, but your skin colour and gender is usually highlighted as though this in itself is an adequate rebuttal of any thoughts / opinions / concerns you have.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:55 AM
2

What frustrates me is that people like 'Karen' here seem to assume that their pay is lower because they're female. I wonder if Karen actually believes this - or if she just recognises that actually, in the current climate, it's quite profitable for her to scream about equal pay for women etc and there's a good chance nobody will shut her down for fear of being labelled sexist. It is not at all uncommon to be offered different pay based on experience. If I run a garage, repairing cars and Mr Smit…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/19 10:42 AM
1

People who end up in jail...like you did - twice.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/19 01:30 AM
1

I'm not asleep at night - locking up people like you.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 09:45 PM
1

I'm not really arsed in honesty. Out of the two of us only one has had to be isolated from the law-abiding folk - and that was you pal.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 03:55 PM
1

Oh look - a criminal who doesn't like the Police. How original.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 06:18 AM
2

Following me around on different threads? You sure are butthurt - and blocked. Jog on you little keyboard warrior.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 07:27 PM
2

Still crying? Go grab yourself a tissue.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 06:43 PM
1

Look at how many replies the sad little racist made! It's so easy to trigger people like you. It's funny to picture you there in your mum's spare room, face contorted with anger - fat podgy little fingers hammering furiously against the keyboard...I've clearly hit a nerve - 11 messages in just a few hours! I pity you that you spend so much of your time devoted to sending me these little rants. Despite all your best efforts - is this the best you can do? I earn more than you! My mum's spare room?…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 06:33 PM
2

You're a keyboard warrior and a coward. Go cry somewhere else - nobody cares that you're upset.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 06:20 PM
1

Grow up you odious little troll.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 06:11 PM
8

You're a racist who believes in astral projection and conspiracy theories. Your opinion is laughably irrelevant to me. Back to your mum's spare room to play your Xbox and smoke your weed you little loser - nobody gives a damn about your opinion :)
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 02:33 PM
6

'Abuse' oh good Lord what a sheltered life you must have led.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 12:34 PM
6

Call me crazy but you can clearly see in the video he's pulling her up she's just choosing to act as a dead weight. It's her choice to get dragged along the floor.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 12:33 PM
1

Yeah see it isn't hard is it? I begin every encounter politely- it's up to the member of the public how they want to take it from there. If they want to be hostile then they can't be surprised if my tone also changes. I've arrested people for all manner of horrific crimes and been able to speak to them quite politely and in a civil fashion with no need for aggression or hostility throughout the entire experience. Unfortunately you get some people (one such mouth breather is replying on this very…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 12:31 PM
7

Oh bullied at school - how original. Sorry you get butthurt at thinking about the Police. Rest assured your opinion is utterly irrelevant and the extent of your ability to influence anything regarding the Police is limited to these childish rants on Reddit. Go on pal, bite again and show us how mad you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 12:27 PM
1

I'm not really interested in talking with idiots like yourself who get triggered by my occupation. Nobody cares what you think.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 11:03 AM
1

In lots of cases (over here anyway) it's because people want some sort of financial pay out. We'll routinely get sued by people we've dealt with because they want money for nothing.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 09:59 AM
1

What humiliation would that be?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 09:58 AM
1

As a UK Police Officer this behavior is extremely common. We live in the age of the smart phone - someone is always filming and a lot of these grown-children like to pretend they're badly hurt and you're viciously assaulting them for the benefits of the camera crowd.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 08:23 AM
2

“It was a drunken act,” she told Nine News. “It was my 21st birthday and it’s not me. I don’t know why I did that and I wasn’t in the right mind frame.” Guys - chill! She said sorry! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/19 05:26 PM
1

Pepper spray relies on you to hit them in the eyes. Holding your arm up is an effective defence to it as an example. The spray is easily diverted by the wind making it hard to hit, and it's easy to utilise makeshift defences such as a bin-lid or even sunglasses to negate it. Individuals who are extremely determined,suffering a mental episode or under the influence of drugs will also often keep going despite having been sprayed. Pepper spray is NOT a good option vs someone charging you with a kni…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/19 10:13 PM
1

I can tell you've never used pepper spray....
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/19 09:38 PM
1

That's a bit like saying why carry pepper spray....different tools for different situations. A taser isn't the best choice for a knife unless you don't have a firearm or your firearm is broken.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/19 09:06 PM
2

This is the one thing that can combat school shootings, today, right now. I hate to say it, but the kids have to stand up against it. I think it's a little unfair to expect children aged 5-18 to do anything other than run away really fast when someone storms into their school in the middle of their history lesson and opens fire. There are solutions, but expecting Mary, aged 7 and Nigel aged 15 to get the shooter in a headlock probably isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:35 PM
-10

So don't stoop to their level?
/r/MensRights10/05/19 12:37 PM
1

I don't think is a gender / male rights thing - surely? Some men kill their kids, some women kill their kids. These people have to be extremely mentally unwell to have killed their own children. There is stuff in the article that further points to her being mentally unwell; * Ms Tompsett had been treated for depression for years and her mental health had worsened. * Mr Woodhams said: "Cheryl had started to behave erratically but more recently there was a noticeable change in her behaviour. "This…
/r/MensRights10/05/19 11:43 AM
6

In terms of Feminism winning in Britain - I don't think that's the case; https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/only-7-per-cent-of-britons-consider-themselves-feminists/ Only 7% in 2016 identified as feminists. What's particularly funny about that article is despite 93% of people not identifying as feminists, the feminist charity that commissioned the survey concluded that Britain was a nation of Hidden feminists- on the basis that most people surveyed believed in gender equality but didn't iden…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:30 AM
1

It is a choice they make, and a choice they should live with. I agree - and I'm not saying they're forced to - but that choice is usually made by both parties in the relationship. If my wife wants to give up her job and stay at home and raise the kids and I agree to that then I'm kind of complicit in her losing her earning and her earning potential - It seems a bit cruel if we divorce 7-8 years later to then go Ha - screw you you're on your own - because I agreed with her that I'd be the sole br…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 11:48 AM
1

I think in some cases it's partly justified - if in a marriage both parties agree that one of them will stay at home and clean the house, raise the kids etc - whilst the other one works - if the marriage then breaks down after a few years then the stay-at-home spouse can't realistically just click their fingers and find themselves in gainful employment overnight - so there should be some sort of payment to support them, but I don't see why (as in some cases) this should last a substantial period…
/r/MensRights02/05/19 10:47 AM
2

There are two courts - Magistrates and Crown. Magistrates is for low level stuff - littering up to low level assaults etc. Crown would include things like this; rape, murder, drug dealing, serious fraud. In Crown there's always a Jury.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 09:49 AM
12

I still dont understand what goes through the minds of the judges for these cases. The Judge doesn't decide on guilt. It's the Jury.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:45 PM
7

don't you think they look exactly the same? Racist ​ (JOKE)
/r/MensRights01/05/19 08:11 AM
1

It's not just the whole "protect women" thing - although that's definitely a factor - it's also the fact that they didn't really want men fighting / getting jealous over who was banging who in the unit.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 10:02 AM
2

You are a despicable human being. Says the guy asking the question Whose fault is it? If a woman gets raped after daring to party at a rich guys house. Look in a mirror pal.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 01:15 AM
2

Op,what you do now is despicable, you try to mob and rally people against me and my opinion. He hasn't tried to mob anyone against you - he didn't even name you.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 01:13 AM
1

Yeah I get that opting out of the workplace leaves you at a disadvantage...but it's still a choice that couples make. In my case I make more than my wife so it was a no-brainer that she'd take the time off...we couldn't afford anything else. Anecdotaly though I have seen numerous women I know at work who earn the exact same wage as their husbands (due to being in the same job) complain how their being pregnant will impact upon their promotion prospects - and yet when I suggest they ask their hus…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:18 PM
1

Why are people still under the illusion that women face unfair treatment in career advancement? Lots of reasons; People lack the time/inclination/intellect to go and find out these things for themselves. They see an article in a newspaper telling them that women are oppressed just about everywhere and they think Well, I guess that's true then... Some women have struggled to progress in their career. Perhaps they've been unlucky, perhaps they're just not good enough to get that promotion or that …
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:20 PM
1

Well we'll agree to disagree - but there are plenty of occasions where not acting would require a justification in most people's eyes.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:36 AM
0

I'm referring to my first post! The sentence I broke down is in my first post, in it's entirety. You've then said I should have quoted the first bit of that sentence - it's in my first post. Chill out and just read what I've written.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:50 AM
1

I get what you're saying, I just think that society would generally be a better place if people stood up for each other (regardless of gender) more often. How often do you see someone getting abuse on a train or a bus - and everyone just puts their earphones in and pretends they can't see what's right in front of them. ​ Years ago I remember being on a bus when two 14/15 year olds were abusing another one who it seemed like they didn't know. It got worse and worse to the point where one was thre…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:48 AM
1

I rule them out because are you gonna step between two dudes about to fight? No? Yes, and I have done. Then if you are stepping between a guy and a woman, then you are doing so because of sex and are sexist. Nope.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:42 AM
1

Yes, they do. But this isn't an excuse to never act surely?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:41 AM
-2

I quoted both bits - it's right there in my post.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:40 AM
-1

His use of the word potentially doesn't equate to what I've said. "A man has no business confronting random sexist strangers." - This is a pretty straightforward statement - he's not saying "Unless the man is 6'7 and really strong" or "Unless the guy feels confident he can deal with it" - he's saying that a man (and he doesn't list or hint at any exceptions) shouldn't get involved. "....that is potentially dangerous" - and he ends by saying that such situations can be potentially dangerous - ind…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 01:10 AM
1

A man has no business confronting random, sexist strangers, that is potentially dangerous. Doesn't it depend on the man and the situation?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:01 AM
1

That may be so, but it doesn't mean that the police is not biased on some level. Ok - so make your case. In what way are they biased, and what's your evidence?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:48 PM
3

it's not unlikely that the police is also biased and that men are seen as a "bigger threat" than female suspects because of stereotypes about how men are the violent gender. Police Officer here. It's not a stereotype - it's fact. Men typically are taller, have better reach, increased muscle mass, weigh more - and generally speaking in some circles/communities/groups there's a "Don't back down!" culture amongst some men that means they feel unable to just walk away from conflict - this isn't real…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:47 PM
1

I'm sure I read they are literally designed to be unignorbale. It's to stop you just wandering off and forgetting about them or not bothering to feed them etc. This is why their crying and behaviour can so effectively grab your attention and press your buttons
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:38 AM
0

I haven't justified her reaction though have I?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:37 AM
2

I feel sorry for you if that's what you've taken from what I've said.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 08:51 PM
0

They can be difficult - but for every temper tantrum, soiled nappy etc - they repay it with positive moments x10.... unless you just have a little bastard for a child!
/r/MensRights20/04/19 07:45 PM
1

....I've already explained all of this.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 07:21 PM
2

I've literally just explained what kind of information is usually utilised to make a decision regarding custody....
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:55 PM
5

I don't believe in jumping to conclusions based on scant information (shocking I know). As someone who works in the Criminal Justice System in the UK, there are a lot of variables that go into sentencing and into custodial sentences in particular - such as the defendant's history and pre-sentence reports from probation service about whether or not probation feel they can work with the defendant outside of a custodial environment to reduce offending. ​ But yeah - you go grab your pitchfork.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:02 PM
5

You're assuming I'd have a different attitude if it was a male.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:00 PM
7

Thank you
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:29 PM
2

You're probably right - unfortunately.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:29 PM
2

I'll repeat again; ​ I'd also think a custodial sentence should probably be looked at too.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:28 PM
1

I'd struggle to give an exact answer to that as I'd want to know what typical sentences are in that state for similar crimes. Without that knowledge I'd say she definitely needs to have the child taken off of her and be subject to social services to safeguard any future children she has or has contact with. I'd also think a custodial sentence should probably be looked at too.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:49 PM
1

As someone who has children - sometimes they won't sleep, they won't stop crying - it can be an extremely trying and difficult experience, and it's one that you aren't really prepared for if it's your first child especially. Humans obviously vary wildly from one to the next and some people - like this girl here, clearly have anger management issues ( Another witness told investigators Joe hit a 12-year-old girl with a cellphone cord and pushed her from behind.) - if you have anger management iss…
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:37 PM
7

Under the Sexual Offences Act you need to penetrate someone in the vagina, anus or mouth with a penis. ​ A woman can only aid and abet a rape - she cannot be the sole offender - i.e. cannot be the one penetrating.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 10:26 AM
2

but it makes me think can you be raped with other 'Devices' ? That would be sexual assault
/r/MensRights13/04/19 10:24 AM
1

They're actually extremely well spoken.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:16 PM
1

Yes, it is not uncommon for the police to ask to inspect your phone, and then the critical pictures and videos have been deleted, I have heard this warning a few times about dealing with police. ​ Is this anecdotal - or is there a source to back this up? It seems odd that a Police Officer would risk their career for what? To try and ensure some guy either gets arrested or doesn't get believed - for what purpose? Chances are the Officer dealing with you will have literally never met you or your p…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:15 PM
2

When the police arrive, it does not matter who hit who, it is the male that will go to jail, "Duluth Model Of Domestic Violence Intervention". I have spoken to men who were arrested when they were the ones doing the bleeding. As someone who has arrested many women for domestic violence - what you are saying is untrue. ​ Record her attacks with your cell phone if you can and send the recordings to someone before the police delete the videos. Don't know where you live - but where I work you litera…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:14 PM
5

"I'm not resisting!!!!" - she's literally ignored most of his instructions, so she certainly is not complying.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 07:03 PM
21

And in other news, most water is wet......
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:09 PM
637

And in other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:02 PM
5

Executives listening to people asking for more pay isn't the same as granting completely equal pay regardless of the variables though.... my boss can listen to me ask for a raise - doesn't mean I'm going to get it though.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:20 PM
17

Turner says she isn't bothered by the pay disparity because Harington's role for the last series, he had something crazy like 70 night shoots, and I didn’t have that many. I was like, 'You know what... you keep that money.'" ​
/r/MensRights02/04/19 03:06 PM
1

Ssshh you're ruining the joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/19 12:26 PM
6

Ha - how do you plan on getting to the afterlife then genius???
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/19 02:13 PM
1

It was on 0 - I upvoted it back to 1 - I see it's now on 0 again.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 02:08 PM
2

it turned out all of them believe differences appear very early and aren't societal If you see it every day you're going to start believing your own eyes above the 'assumed truth' pushed by those who don't really know what they're talking about. Similar to a story I remember reading years ago about a creationist who firmly believed the Earth to only be a few thousand years old and started working in an office that was analyzing data around the soil and rocks in the Earth - and he wrote about how…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 01:18 PM
1

It's depressing to see: A) Your fairly civil post was down-voted B) Some of the replies on here - which perfectly proved the point you were trying to make. I think there are some real issues in western society at the moment around the way men are treated and portrayed. I believe in an equal society where people have as close to equal rights in a legal and social sense as possible. I don't think some of the attitudes frequently displayed on this sub, which border on fanatical at times, help. Bein…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 01:15 PM
1

Hey if it helps you feel better at night to paint me as that- go you. You're obviously quite insecure, hence you keep biting every time. The rage, the insults, the threats - it paints a revealing picture about you. You're an IT technician - good for you - not known for being the best paying job but hey if you're happy with it good for you :-) I'll be retired at 55 and in the mean time I have an interesting and exciting job that pays well for my rank. Best part? Knowing all the people out there j…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/19 01:46 PM
1

I work plain clothes, so they don't :) And yes I am proud, thanks. You keep ranting and raging on Reddit - I'll enjoy my well paid job and early retirement - especially knowing all the haters like yourself will likely be working until you're 70+ for peanuts. Enjoy pal ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/19 12:50 PM
1

It won't. That's what pisses people like you off. I'm going to have a long and productive career. I'll carry on earning a decent wage. I'll retire at a nice young age. You? You'll keep getting angry - you'll keep ranting on Reddit. It's pathetic.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/19 12:28 PM
1

Don't you worry petal, there's always plenty of time to bully victims like you
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/19 12:04 PM
1

Are you sure? You sure seem mightily upset - I've just been sat here laughing at you whilst you rage, threaten, insult and generally demonstrate that impotent rage that's quite clearing brewing up inside you. Let it all out - you'll feel better.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/19 09:14 AM
0

This is delightful. I'm completely under your skin hahaha. Keep crying boy this is hilarious.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 06:49 PM
0

Pictures rather than words more your thing huh?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 06:33 PM
1

Thanks- it's worth it for how angry it makes delicate flowers like yourself. So much anger, and there's nothing you can do except rant on Reddit. Shame. Show us some more of that rage - it's hilarious!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 06:01 PM
1

Cop and proud. Big smile on my face to know it riles you. Enjoy that impotent rage pal.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 05:49 PM
1

Still going? Feeling any better yet? Or still consumed with rage? Must be frustrating for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 05:04 PM
1

I imagine I'd struggle to find it.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 12:36 PM
0

It's like you're getting dumber each post you make....it's fascinating to watch.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 12:36 PM
0

Get it all out - all that impotent rage...you'll feel better for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 12:07 PM
0

Did I hit a nerve? What a delicate little flower you are. Get all your rage out on here - I imagine it's the only place in your life you can get angry without getting either knocked out or laughed out. So now it's call her an ambulance? Thought your cracking advice was to just bugger off and leave her to it? Make your mind up pal! You haven't heard of an improvised weapon have you? You think a large chunck of concrete can't be used to hurt someone? You're a bit slow...we may need those crayons a…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/19 08:24 AM
1

The aggressive tone you adopt speaks volumes about you and is kind of what I expected. The point I was making (which I thought was rather obvious - but it appears you failed to grasp it) is that had the officer just resumed his duties (as you seemed to advocate) and she had gone on to cause harm to herself or another as a result of mental health episode, you would likely chastise the officer for having resumed his duties and not dealt with the woman who was holding an improvised weapon. Do I nee…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 10:55 PM
2

If, as many have speculated - she's having some sort of mental health episode and she had proceeded to throw that brick at a car / individual - you seem like exactly the type of person who would complain that the Police just left her to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 06:10 PM
1

She threatened the officer with a rock. She threatened to kill one of the officers. The officers then made the attempt to get her, whereupon she threw the rock at an officer hitting him in the shoulder. She continued he's to fight once restrained on the floor, kicking out at the officers. She 100% caused this incident - summoning Police assistance and then arming herself with an improvised weapon and threatening those same officers who had arrived to help her.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 03:34 PM
6

The Police aren't social workers or mental health workers. They disarmed her, prevented her harming herself or anyone else, they showed patience - a rock that size can cause significant damage if it smacks you right in the face. I think the idea that they didn't deal with this situation very well is a little unfair on the officers to be honest.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 11:28 AM
3

Did you call 911? What's going on? Hey, what's going on? Come back over... Put the rock down for me.... Can you put the rock down for me? Hey, put the rock down for me.... The rock, put it down.... Hey, can you put the rock down for me....? The rock in your hand, put it down for me would you? Are you able to put it down for me, or no? No, no no no - put the rock down.... Put it down.... Put it down.... Hey, put it down.... ​ Right the way throughout she showed absolutely no interest in talking t…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 10:43 AM
2

They saw the same video, they're just stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 09:07 AM
5

What would you have done?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/19 09:06 AM
1

Nobody cares what you think :-)
/r/MensRights22/03/19 01:56 PM
14

This is why things like a justice system are so important....we get a set of rules, it's (largely) transparent and we don't leap to knee-jerk, hysterical reactions but instead get to consider the volume and quality of evidence.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 12:40 AM
2

I think this is an example of pussypass being intact. If those 3 were men they'd have been subjected to significantly more force. One of the girls repeatedly kicks out at one of the bouncers with no reply - if I did that, as a bloke, I'd expect to be attacked after the first kick.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/19 09:34 PM
–

I've not really followed this particular matter that much, so I can't really speak to the specifics - but, there does often seem to be a societal double standard when it comes to DV/DA if the male is the victim. We hear things like "Believe the victim" - but it seems we perhaps need to add "Unless they have a penis" for it to be accurate (sadly).
/r/MensRights15/03/19 07:24 PM
5

I'd just say I identify as a woman and take the discount.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:34 PM
1

It looks horribly racist now to anyone who hasn't had a lobotomy
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:44 PM
2

It's the look of shock on her face once she's back on her feet - clearly didn't expect him to react.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/19 11:39 AM
4

Just say you identify as a woman.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:55 AM
9

Just got banned for posting an inoffensive comment on an article about this on that sub. Seems like a slight hint of dissent is sufficient for a ban.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/19 04:41 PM
1

That's what we call a major backtrack....
/r/MensRights02/03/19 11:49 PM
10

As someone who has worked with forensics in law enforcement, I would be highly doubtful you'd get DNA off of a head butt. I mean, perhaps if there was blood on his head etc....other than that....no.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:23 PM
5

From a quick glance at the trailer on Youtube - this seems to be a documentary looking back at feminism in the 70's and comparing it with now. I think feminists in the 60's and 70's had fairly legitimate complaints - society was massively unequal in comparison to today and women didn't always have the same legal rights - society was hugely sexist and women often weren't taken seriously. This is one of the reasons some of the 'modern' feminists are quite irritating when they try to make out that …
/r/MensRights17/02/19 03:28 PM
2

This type of crap used to just get dismissed as the ravings of people with a few screws missing - now it's considered progressive.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:52 PM
1

No, at least not that I've seen. I've sunk about 2-3 hours into it and not seen any yet.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:20 PM
1

True, but not playing the game isn't going to financially damage the company at all - which is what one normally means when they say "vote with your wallet"
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:34 AM
2

I think as MrHolte has said - a 'paper abortion' of sorts is a good idea. There does however have to be a time limit - it wouldn't be right if you could relinquish paternal rights the day before the baby is born. Perhaps, a pre-pregnancy contract of sorts? I.e. you sign and date a contract stating that if a baby is born you relinquish all rights to it - and then there's no "whoops! I'm pregnant!" moment and you're stuck with a hefty bill.....once you're ready to settle down and have kids you cou…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:32 AM
11

I don't really think this matters... I've played a few hours of this game - the sexuality of the characters is irrelevant to the game. I had no idea any of them were LGBT until I've read your post.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:29 AM
1

It's free.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 10:28 AM
11

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrollXChromosomes/comments/82hnmc/mrw_im_reminded_why_i_never_visit_the_frontpage/
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:54 PM
1

Ah....now assuming that's an accurate version of what she alleged then I fail to see how the CPS could have run with this. Mistakes do happen and usually the other way around (people not getting charged who should), but this definitely would need looking at why this was taken forward
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:17 PM
-5

The details in the case are sparse - we aren't told what the alleged victim has claimed and the results of any other witness testimony that may have been gathered. I've investigated lots of matters like this myself. If she came in and said "This guy walked past me, groped me/touched me - the touching was sexual in nature etc..." we'd obviously, and quite rightly investigate it. If I then got hold of that CCTV and it shows a male matching the description she'd given of the offender - it shows him…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:54 AM
1

Slowing CCTV is quite common in any criminal trial. Events happen quickly and the jury need to be able to see things clearly - this often means slowing down footage. A good example from the area I work is CCTV footage, played at full speed showed a group of men in a fight - one guy gets punched multiple times. It later transpires that guy had been stabbed. It's only by slowing the CCTV right down that you could see the telltale silver flash of a knife in one of the attackers hands. This was key …
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:49 AM
3

It's because rape is defined as penetrating with a penis - women have no penis therefore.... They can however 'aid and abet' a rape.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:47 AM
14

They can fuck right off. Quality book.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:11 AM
1

Yeah it's fine. It's almost certainly a tongue-in-cheek attempt at humour
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:47 PM
14

Oh my god.... Many men have, of course, ended up raising children who were not genetically their own, but really, does it matter? You'd think this was out of the Onion - surely!?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:11 PM
1

I don't comment much on Youtube but is it pinned if it says by your comment "HIGHLIGHTED COMMENT" ?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:46 AM
3

Get woke, go broke
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:33 AM
7

The Daily Mail has always been a bit of a joke of a newspaper - often seeking to promote an agenda with heavily biased reporting, rather than dispassionate and fair reporting... There's a line in the article: But Cpl Dougherty – the only woman on the course – and 14 others who also failed were told they could carry on Right - so it wasn't only the woman who was allowed to carry on - 15 of them were allowed to carry on, 14 of them being men. Now you may well say that perhaps they were so desperat…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 03:48 PM
5

The problem is, there were multiple mentions of *this* sub in that thread as well. Look through some of the posts and you'll see plenty of examples of people generalising about all women, making outrageous and absurd statements about women and their intentions, and plenty just being downright abusive. There's also plenty of people downvoting any attempt to question/disagree with whatever the group narrative currently is. Don't get me wrong - plenty of people making legitimate points and raising …
/r/MensRights12/01/19 04:40 PM
10

It's difficult to offer advice without knowing the nature of your work and the nature of the bullying... In general I would say: 1) Log the behavior - preferably something timestamped - i.e. an email to yourself 2) Speak with your line manager - let them know what's going on 3) Speak with your union rep - let them know what's going on 4) Speak with those doing the actual bullying - they may not realise their behavior is upsetting you - telling them to leave you alone may resolve everything. Even…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:05 AM
13

I honestly thought you were ultimately agreeing with my premise that [statistically] no one is going to jail based on a false accusation. Sorry I may just be tired - but are you saying that literally no one is jailed for rape falsely?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:02 AM
1

What I find concerning is looking at that second article (Jan 10th) - it's painted very much as: This woman was potentially in this horrible, abusive, violent relationship - and she's just snapped . Now, I think in situations like that if it's proven that someone is in a relationship where they are being controlled, attacked - a really nasty situation - it should certainly be a mitigating factor when it comes to sentencing - but not a straight defence (i.e. enough to find you Not Guilty). Now, i…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:03 PM
4

Most of the cases will involve a video interview - so the defence team can see for themselves what questions were asked and whether they were leading questions.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:25 PM
10

Obviously it's a different country so I'm aware the rules and systems vary - but in Britain, in a civil court the required standard of evidence to prove a case is lower than in the criminal courts. In the criminal courts (which you would have been facing on a rape allegation) you need to prove the defendant (i.e. you) is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Which is quite a high bar to hit. In contrast in the civil courts you need only show that the defend (i.e. her if you sued) is guilty on the bala…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:14 PM
1

I'd agree with you. I've been using this sub for a few days now and I notice there's some users who are downright toxic, and there are plenty of comments which are frankly - inappropriate. I think it's easy to get into a bit of an echo chamber - but people need to step back and try and be a bit less emotional and a bit more rational. Some of the comments don't paint the sub in a good light at all. I think a good rule of thumb is for users to look at their comments and think Would I be happy with…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:04 PM
-1

I think it's quite sad that you feel the need to shoe-horn a discussion you and I had into this, and also to name me. I think this is one of the things that the OP is talking about in terms of civility and having a terrible attitude. I'm not going to stoop to your level and give my own re-run of the discussion we had as it's there for anyone to see, and frankly - I think it's only you who are interested. Move on with your life - we disagreed on something, it's not that important.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:50 PM
5

So, as a man - if I hit my wife it's my fault. If my wife hits me - it's probably still my fault....
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:39 PM
1

I'd agree that it could be considered systemic in that disclosure failures are happening under the current system partly due to the setup of the system. I don't agree that there is any evidence of malicious failures to disclosure - there have been disclosure issues before Saunders after all - and there will be disclosure issues now she's gone. I think also that things like; Even were it was not malicious, it was sufficiently reckless as to be indistinguishable from malice. Is a big statement and…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 08:15 PM
1

So I think its important to define systemic at this point - so we both know what the other is talking about. How are you defining it?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:53 PM
2

I don't really see a big issue with this. People should be more open with their bodies (men and women alike) and I don't see any issue with people being honest about what they find attractive and unattractive in a potential partner.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:04 AM
1

See, again you're struggling so I'll make it a bit clearer for you (I think we're going to need crayons for you soon though as I'm not sure how much clearer I can make this)... ​ You've created a line that has two main pieces of information - in the context of what you have said drinking six pints of beer is considered by most to be ok - and driving home is considered by most to be ok - so it's quite evident that you won't be arguing you shouldn't do these which only leaves one likely option whi…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:44 AM
1

I think 0.15% of all cases is quite comfortably within the margins of human error - if you're going to argue it is systemic you'd need to demonstrate that.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:32 AM
0

No, it leaves one option, your number 3. I don't actually believe you lack the intelligence to spot the ambiguity in your statement - either you generally do lack the intelligence, or you're just being difficult - presumably because I've disagreed with your views elsewhere in this thread and made efforts to back up what I've said and for whatever reason, this has irritated you. Person A went to do B and he went without C. Never do that. Never do B without C! Which is clearer? Which is more likel…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:16 PM
1

Yes I'm well aware of what you said - and once more, it wasn't clear if you were referring to a) voluntary attendance b) without a solicitor or c) both. The fact that you can't see this (although I rather suspect you can see this but you choose not to) is amazing.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:04 PM
-1

As I've said in another reply - it wasn't clear what you meant at all. Perhaps (whilst we're going to question each others competence) you struggle with expressing your opinion in a clear and coherent manner? And whereas I am an identifiable individual, you are hiding behind a Reddit pseudonym. It is you who are the random person. Well observed. What is your point there exactly? (Once more, the exact point you seek to make is not clear - is it?). Is it that because I am the 'random person' I am …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:29 PM
0

Well it wasn't clear what you meant - the comment you quoted wasn't: "He was interviewed without a lawyer" And you then responded "Never do that" The comment was "He was interviewed voluntarily without a lawyer" Which leaves three options as to what you meant, given that there are two main pieces of information in the sentence: Don't be interviewed voluntarily Don't be interviewed without a lawyer Don't be interviewed voluntarily without a lawyer. As you didn't specify it leaves people to guess …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:19 PM
1

This sounds unpleasantly like "because he said 'no comment', we're not going to find the evidence." Very thin ice No it's more because someone won't tell the Police where the evidence is - it's much harder for them to find it. That shouldn't be a contentious thing to say. If you're alleged to have punched your neighbor and 4-5 months later, 2 days before the trial you suddenly decide to disclose (after 4-5 months of silence and No Comment) that in fact the postman saw what happened and can confi…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:09 PM
1

Yes - correct. Police & Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Code G Paragraph 2.9 Section E Sub-section i) The above allows for an officer to arrest you where it is thought unlikely that you would attend a Police station voluntarily to be interviewed. So it is quite simple - I invite you into the station for a voluntary interview about a criminal matter I am investigating that you are a suspect in. You have read some legal advice from some random person on Reddit that says you should NEVER consent to this…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:58 AM
1

Again it doesn't work like this. When a smart phone is downloaded most forces utilise a specialist department to download the phone - the officer simply requests what they want from the phone - i.e. photo's, messages, appdata - etc. In most cases it won't be relevant for example to request Wi-Fi settings or Wi-Fi history - so it isn't requested. This means that the officer doesn't get back *all* of the data on the phone - even the reduced amount that is returned is still vast, so you can imagine…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:41 AM
1

Just as an addition - it's funny how many people clearly got triggered by this comment. Someone (potentially) offers quite terrible legal advice over the internet - that advice is corrected, and downvoted. ​ Do yourselves a favor; https://www.lawtonslaw.co.uk/resources/voluntary-police-interviews-your-rights/ ​ If you ever get asked in for a voluntary interview for ANYTHING - attend. If you get asked in and ignore me - be sure to drop me a message so I can say "Told you so." when you get arreste…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:14 AM
1

916 cases - as your own article says, makes up just 0.15% of cases. Flipped around, in 99.85% of cases there is no evidence of any disclosure issues. Your own article again highlights the number is going up - I seem to recall pointing out that since austerity the workload for individual officers has gone up, and up, and up - it is no surprise more and more mistakes are made as the impact of the cuts bites more and more each year. In terms of Police being 'trained to hide evidence' - that is simp…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:03 AM
0

So a failure to disclose is equivalent to making a conscious effort to hide it? In order for the officers to have 'hidden it' there needs to be: i) Knowledge of the existence of the item they have 'hidden' - you cannot hide something if you don't even know it exists. ii) An intention to hide it. This should be fairly obvious. You can't 'accidentally' hide something. As someone who has had to download smart phones and sift through the evidence I can tell you that the amount of data that can come …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:56 AM
1

You're entitled to a lawyer if you get interviewed voluntarily!
/r/MensRights08/01/19 07:35 AM
10

"You can all fuck right into hell where you belong" I wonder why you got banned.... Really think you're going to change anyone's mind like that?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:50 PM
0

I think you misunderstand. In England & Wales you can be interviewed 'voluntarily' - this does not mean without a lawyer. You get all the same legal rights and protections afforded to someone in custody (i.e. a free and independent legal adviser, free of charge).
/r/MensRights07/01/19 05:18 PM
-5

Were they actually hiding it - or just missed it? If we're thinking of the same case that was in the news recently I don't think there was any intention to conceal evidence proven...
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:17 PM
4

So surely you just say you identify as gender-fluid and take the free course?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:16 PM
-9

Never do what? Be interviewed voluntarily? Sure- refuse. You'll be arrested and spend hours in a cell instead - and still get interviewed.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:07 PM
3

No exactly, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 08:25 PM
4

Ironic....considering this is one of the main thing people criticise feminism for.....
/r/MensRights06/01/19 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter