TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThrashSurf Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by ThrashSurf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Liberalism
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/18 02:50 PM
1

Ironically enough, using the word "coldly" in association with "logical" and "rational", isn't logical nor rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/18 08:27 AM
1

Remember when internet mass surveillance was a "conspiracy theory" too? Those who dismiss "conspiracy theories" wholesale are merely morons who tow the party line and/or have in interest in keeping the status quo. There have been many attested conspiracies throughout history. Why would there not be any at all, all of a sudden? Or are you stupid enough to believe the state has everyone's best interest at heart (which is an especially funny belief in an individualistic society of everyone for hims…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/18 07:04 AM
15

The wrong assumption here is that there are few or no women who are unemployed, low-income, very old, no car/house, alcoholic, drug addicts, and criminals.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 09:00 AM
0

Muh survival
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/18 08:33 AM
2

"How else can you explain all creation?" Hint: search engine
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/18 12:55 PM
1

Triggered.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/18 07:21 PM
8

"evolutionary psychology fact" that's like an "astrology fact".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/18 02:00 PM
2

Again, I don't believe. Height is certainly not an innate preference and cultural beyond doubt. This has been demonstrated with some foragers. Facial symmetry could to some extent have neurological bias, as there seems to be bias for symmetry not even necessarily with faces. However nothing is understood about how it works and even if turns out to be real, it certainly doesn't support "hypergamy", quite the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 12:26 AM
2

I don't believe. They're certainly not random, nothing is random, but they are highly dependent on environmental/cultural context.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 09:30 PM
3

"Muh challenge, muh competition, muh risk taking!" Something that is admirable about both sexes? Not being 'murican.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 05:04 PM
2

A species that doesn't have sight like there are billions perhaps? Besides, a physical mating preference doesn't mean only tournament selection. Of course you've never heard of assortative mating, "evolutionary psychologists" have never heard of it either. It is way more adaptive than tournament selection because it's way more efficient at gene replication than tournament selection (see Dawkins' "The Selfish Gene") . And while we are at it, in mostly textbook tournament species such as chimps, f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 04:02 PM
3

evolution is not a matter of belief plenty of pair bonding species who aren't hypergamous, plenty of species that have no hierarchy. Social or otherwise. evolutionary psychology is like all psychology: bullshit. Even worse, it's 'murican bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 01:56 PM
3

Move out of 'murica. On second thought, no, that's not a good idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 12:37 PM
2

As an "english graduate" you mostlikely are cutting edge in fucking up english with latin words to sound smart. Burn down the "humanities".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 08:42 AM
2

At last a murtard admits to it. This whole sub is based on the premise of american bullshit anti-culture being universal (aka ethnocentrism).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 07:40 AM
2

Isn't it odd that those who spend their time praising male competition (and all kinds of other competition usually) then appeal to a "male solidarity/code". Appealing to a code in war/competition is merely a strategy of the unintelligent who rely on strength to win. Like Bolt Thrower says, "In battle there is no law".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/18 03:56 PM
1

Muh Jichad
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 03:06 PM
1

No one in their right mind should trust an american, they'd sell their own mothers for a handful of dollars.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 09:07 PM
1

I only fart rainbows and unicorns. Don't waste your time bowing before some random human on reddit and go read "Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst" which might bring your head out of the clouds for real.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 07:20 PM
1

Logical fallacies are weapons of rhetoric. Rhetoric is a verbal fight where the goal is to win against an opponent by discrediting him by any means to bystanders. Which is why everyone including you uses logical fallacies in such a verbal fight like the wall of text of ad personam psychobabble nonsense you've been barfing to attack the strawman persona you want bystanders to assume I am. I don't care about being respected by idiots. I neither hate you nor care about "hurting your feelings" becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 07:06 PM
1

Not sure what incels have got to do with free will, except that most of them believe it exists (at least in some cases as most believers are very inconsistent with it) as it's yet another retarded american ideology based on retarded american assumptions which are shared by every shade of american pill ideologies. Of course I have used an ad personam fallacy because it's the best possible answer to one. I'm not trying to convince you here, but make you look like a moron to the smarter and fence s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 06:07 PM
1

All that text for an ad personam fallacy based on assumptions... I wouldn't bother and just call the attention of whoever reads this that all this bullshit you're writing is expected from a typical american retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:54 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:14 PM
2

I'll leave it up to whoever reads this, to decide who doesn't understand the word here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:09 PM
-1

Not required/useful here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:03 PM
2

No, I didn't. I merely don't care about educating the ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:02 PM
1

Let me guess, pseudo-science is what is socially acceptable to not regard as science and/or whatever doesn't align with your retarded american values? "External factors" in the end is all that there is : no such thing as free will. This is also the swindle of psychology : never question external factors always the individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:58 PM
0

You obviously don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:41 PM
0

If you don't understand a word, look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:37 PM
1

More pseudo-scientific bullshit psychology mixed with protestant ethic garbage (hard work): yet another retarded american (oxymoron).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:33 PM
-2

Down syndrome then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:28 PM
-3

Another retarded american.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:21 PM
0

Since your whole fucking value system is based on something that does not exist, you're going to have to hamster some crap of why it can't be true, when it's obvious it is or else everything you believe comes crashing down. Hence cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:16 PM
5

'Murican social darwinistic bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:07 PM
1

You don't understand much, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:47 PM
0

Cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:38 PM
-1

Faith
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:08 PM
5

Tired old ethnocentric bullshit. Most of homo sapiens existence was as nomadic hunter gatherers. How many Hadza prostitutes do you know? Or Inuit? (Hint: zero).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 12:26 PM
2

muh survival
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 09:32 AM
1

Just about everytime some 'murican uses the word "hardwired" the sentence in which this word is used is demonstrably false.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 09:15 AM
0

No they don't. And men neither. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mbqwjx/you-have-no-free-will
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 08:24 AM
1

Your cousins are descendants of criminals, religious nuts, gold fevered psychopaths and other rejects from Europe?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 08:20 PM
4

But most importantly, mostly 'muricans, the world's lowest low life scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 06:00 PM
1

Fuck off from here you filthy subhuman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 01:32 PM
4

Tons of women are abusive with children more often even their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 10:57 AM
4

I wonder who was the ignorant moron who said or wrote that nonsensical grandiose sounding bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 10:53 AM
4

Not really, the USA and australia are the dumping grounds for criminals, religious nutcases, gold diggers and quite a few aristocrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 05:01 PM
1

Their laws are designed to keep 99% of the population economically powerless. Jobs are slavery. Voting for some shithead to take all the decisions for you is a scam.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 08:59 AM
2

Normal people don't think. Normal people are a herd of sheep.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 08:57 AM
4

No one other than americans sees their behavior as merely "friendliness and small talk", everyone one else sees them as loud arrogant wildlings that think they're the center of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 05:55 AM
3

Bullshit, americans are despised for their arrogance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 11:22 PM
1

Bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/18 11:11 PM
1

This is mostly not true. Only a relatively small subset of males are like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 06:51 AM
1

Of course they are. Two sides of the same murtard or to a lesser extent westard coin. It's the result of liberalism (and I don't mean it in the murtard sense of this word): competition, individualism...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/18 03:09 PM
1

Always the same tired old bullshit repeated again and again. https://www.amazon.com/Naked-Bonobo-Lynn-Saxon/dp/1523945516
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/18 04:10 PM
1

Looks like muhrica's problem with fatalities from medical mistakes is not gonna get better any time soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:00 PM
1

You clearly don't know even the beginning of shit about anthropology and genetics. Massive Dunning-Kruger effect here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 10:56 PM
1

As opposed to high quality evolutionary psychology just-so stories? Ok, I'll let you drag your knuckles back to your manly neanderthal first world cave while I screenshot your reply and post it on /r/ShitAmericansSay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 10:19 PM
1

Third world shithole? https://www.enago.com/academy/china-overtakes-us-with-highest-number-of-scientific-publications/ https://yourstory.com/2018/02/china-overtakes-us-funding-ai-startups/ https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-lifespan/china-overtakes-u-s-for-healthy-lifespan-who-data-idUSKCN1IV15L www.businessinsider.com/china-overtakes-us-as-worlds-largest-economy-2014-10?op=1 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-17/china-replaces-u-s-as-top-export-market-in-another-asian-nation…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 09:22 PM
1

Like they were wiped out by a species where males are less sexual dimorphic aka homo sapiens? Or like less sexually dimorphic higher IQ east asians are more reproductively sucessful than caucasians and are beating them at civilisation as we speak?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 06:50 PM
1

I literally cannot understand how anyone with eyes can say the earth is a sphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 06:07 PM
0

Actually more sexually dimorphic males are genetically inferior like neanderthal males.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:52 PM
1

Depends on which birds, because there are a lot of pair bonding bird species which don't have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:13 PM
0

That's exactly what happens with pair bonding species. And actually women have been for a long time now selecting men to be less sexually dimorphic as humans are overall much less sexually dimorphic than chimps, gorillas, even bonobos and earlier hominids. https://carta.anthropogeny.org/events/sessions/craniofacial-feminization-canine-and-human-evolution
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:59 PM
1

Belief is the worship of ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:12 PM
1

Chimps (a tournament species) is what you look up to, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:12 PM
1

The moral and legal system is archaic and wrong. It needs to be changed. I don't give two shits about convincing you. Since you don't have free will, trying to convince is a waste of time anyway. I only care about not letting your ignorant views unchallenged for the undecided reader.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:09 PM
1

Yes, I've been thinking about and advocating this for a few years now.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:48 PM
1

Some pair bonding species such as owl monkeys have been shown to be genetically monogamous, which most thought impossible. They don't cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:38 AM
1

No such thing as free will.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:36 AM
1

Dunning-Kruger effect
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 07:23 AM
1

First off, I think the word you want is sociopathic behavior, not psychopathic. No psychopathic behavior https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathic_Personality_Inventory Second, “liberal” does not mean hierarchical. There is no liberal society that is not hierarchical. The blind worship of freedom is the the worship of the law of the jungle which is the ultimate hierarchy. Third, if “liberal societies” find these behaviors attractive, why do they routinely dole out punishment to curb them? They …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 07:14 AM
1

Free will does not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 07:08 AM
1

Who cares about "hard work" it's just american protestant ethic bullshit anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 07:06 AM
2

Humans and the hominids they are descended from have been evolving away from tournament species characteristics for a long time and by now have a few characteristics of pair bonding species. Humans are in no way a textbook tournament species, at worst a pretty confused species. But it still would be good thing for humans to evolve to be a textbook pair bonding species and why not use a form of soft-eugenics to accelerate that process.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 06:54 AM
0

What you don't seem to get is that this bad (psychopathic) behavior goes hand in hand with a set of phenotypical traits which liberal (more broadly hierarchical) societies consider "attractive".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:59 AM
1

Thanks for the link. Unfortunately for some reason tumblr does not want to cough up that tag. But I searched on DuckDuckGo and found some things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 09:47 PM
1

That's interesting. Do you have a link to some radfem criticism of bdsm/dom/sub stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 06:06 PM
2

It's not present in everyone to the same extent. At least the receptors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 11:50 AM
1

It's not under debate, it's established.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 11:45 AM
1

Let me google this for you: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-4871-3_28
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 11:45 AM
1

Nope not correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 11:43 AM
1

The wrong assumption both of you hold, is that all men (or even humans in general) have the same genes. Some are genetically better at monogamy than others. And monogamy absolutely has a genetic component to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 11:40 AM
1

They're not terribly fortunate compared to women in scandinavia and nomadic hunter gatherer tribes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/18 07:29 PM
1

Do you work?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 11:12 AM
4

Baldness looks like shit for sure. But it certainly isn't a lack of "virility". High testosterone makes you lose your hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 10:46 AM
13

And the fourth paper is your usual evo-psych speculation/just so stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 10:41 AM
1

I'm just saying that the more you have those traits, the shittier of a person you will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 03:47 PM
1

There is no set up. The species as a whole is evolving so there's a spectrum. Some are better at pair bonding then others. "Nature" is a stupid roman religious idea anyway. Nothing that exists can be "unnatural" or "natural". If you look, you'll find that there are living beings that break just about all the expectations of "natural". Some life forms don't die, and therefore don't need to reproduce. Many species don't have sexual reproduction, they just clone themselves. Some sexual species have…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 03:44 PM
1

emotional control/stoicism = lack of empathy physical strength = goes hand in hand with the other behavioral traits you mention size = the more there is a size difference between men and women in a population the more inegalitarian it is leadership = dominance (therefore hierarchy, therefore inequality) decisiveness = impulsiveness, confidence (correlates with lower intelligence) https://www.belmarrahealth.com/testosterone-makes-men-confident-may-lead-mistakes-study/ All the stuff that psychopat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 09:23 AM
1

Actually 49% of men and 51% of women have never cheated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 09:07 AM
1

You'd have to define precisely what this masculinity is about. But then again I'm not talking about "masculinity" whatever that may be, but hypermasculinity, that is males on the far end of the spectrum in terms of looks and behavior which are strongly linked.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 01:36 AM
1

I agree that natural has nothing to do with good. However the Hadza which are south african nomadic foragers which have no written laws at all and barely any religion are strongly monogamous. They are mostlikely how most humans were like before the invention of agriculture. Humans are less sexually dimorphic than earlier hominids and even less sexually dimorphic than chimpanzees and bonobos. And lower sexual dimorphism is characteristic of monogamous species. Also in polyginous species females c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 01:28 AM
4

Monogamy is not "unnatural". There are litterally tons of monogamous species especially among birds. But also quite a few primates. They're called pair bonding species.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:51 AM
2

Muh Christopher Ryan
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:48 AM
1

Which pre-modernized culture are you referring to exactly? Because some of the most egalitarian foragers that exist to this day are strongly monogamous. Also even in most cultures that allow polyginy, most people are still overwhelmingly monogamous. It's way more likely that monogamy was the norm for foragers before the discovery of agriculture because sexual dimorphism in not only hominids but also humans at least until the discovery of agriculture had been declining. I.e. Humans are less sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:35 AM
1

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150227112757.htm "Our findings indicate that other aggression-related characteristics -- including deceit, risk taking, and lack of empathy -- predict future development of strength in males."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:22 AM
1

They are wrong about that. It's not "what I see". Relativism of ideas is worthless wishful thinking. There's enough behavioral biology / neuroscience / ethology to back that up. If they accept those consequences, then complaining about bad male behavior is pure hypocrisy. What's even worse is that it seems earlier feminists got it right.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 07:58 PM
1

It should be. Actions have consequences. I know it's hard for a western individualist to get this, because they think they live in a vacuum. But everything you do affects others. At the personal level the effect is small, but when this behavior becomes widespread, aggregation of all those who engage in the behavior has a massive effect. It's no different than if you throw away your cigarette bud on the pavement. You'll rationalize that if you do it, it doesn't really matter, because it's just on…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:48 PM
4

They definitely support selecting for hypermasculine behavioral and physical traits by supporting "polyamory" and "sex positiveness". The most sex egalitarian species are always monogamous, so they're definitely shooting themselves in the foot if what they truly want is a sex egalitarian society. They do so because they are a product of the West which is so rabidly socially darwinistic most individuals don't even realize it. Someone in this thread said "It’s possible for men to acquire looks, mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 02:52 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snakes_in_Suits
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 03:34 PM
1

Actually hunting most of the time is more a thing of skill and patience, then something that has anything to do with strength and speed. Most foragers that still exist today use poisoned arrows or spears for hunting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 01:38 AM
1

While it's true that nomadic foragers are very egalitarian compared to agricultural and herding societies, they still all have a sex division of labor. I have never heard of still existing foragers that don't have this. I think I remember that in some south american tribes, it can happen that women do a little bit of hunting too. But it's overall more of an exception than the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 01:30 AM
1

That's not exactly true that it's impossible to imagine what life was like 12,500 years ago. Nomadic foragers still exist to this day and clues can be taken from them. And "might is right" is really the last thing that describes these people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 01:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter