TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Throning Archive

View 2 posts and 336 comments by Throning on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Throning/r/MGTOW25/09/19 07:36 PM
1

DiscussionThroning/r/AntiFeminists13/04/22 02:34 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Because feminism hardly likes to think that maybe, just maybe, someone else of male gender (oppressor/aggressor defined) could possibly suffer as bad or worse as they (statistically) might in terms of offing themselves. Their only reconciliation is claiming victimhood by surviving it - they can't possibly admit that a man be a victim, even of his own doing.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 04:12 AM
1

"But to a certain extent" keeps it in Feminist ideology. The branch it stems from becomes adjacent to "rules for thee but not for me", when other branches argue "but muh equality/independence". At extreme, it would force women into marriages with men they don't actually love (as arranged marriages or other similar), which doesn't sound unusual for India. You'd almost never hear someone actually in the West to say it out loud.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:17 AM
2

"You're not imagining things, teachers, admissions counselors, liberal parents, and hiring officers ARE hideously bigoted against you but it's also vanishingly unlikely to change unless you iron out most of your flaws and become so good at something that even open bigotry cannot stop you." Break it down cuz that's quite a sentence. The who of it - the immediacy of it makes it more urgent that it is, to young men it's the start of the rest of their lives. When I was 18-25, I still didn't know wha…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 04:33 AM
4

that's the absurdism leaking through; if they want to demonize all men, then it follows to demonize everything men ever did. Including build their aqueducts and sky scrapers.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 08:35 PM
14

Anyone who says that, ask them if they heard what Becky Hamber and Brandy Cooney did to a 12 year old boy.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 04:42 AM
17

The more frustrating thing I see is that they'll claim to support "intactivism" about circumcision, then proceed to do absolutely nothing other than talk about it. No picket line marches to denounce the health care system cutting up their infant boys, little if any real action taken other than "Yeah it's bad and we shouldn't do it". Then you get the truly insane feminists that would rather abort a male fetus purely because it's male, and then they want to claim "But we're on your side too!" - ho…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 03:04 PM
1

forced to be fathers, providers, protectors you make it sound like it was compulsory, mandated. I'd argue enough of them were what many/most of those men wanted, or knew/agreed to. through physical violence, shame or other manipulation just... why does this need to be the condition? Like this might as well say "Not all men but enough men" or "All men are monsters, fight me". (edit) Else, how exactly can one "with responsibility, be a wife beater"? -- Tell me you hate men, without telling me you …
/r/MensRights21/04/26 09:42 AM
4

Agreed that so much of it is frustrating. They want equality, but not here. It would be 'equal' to condemn them as rapists and pederasts, throw them in jail for 10-20 years, and a coin flip on whether they get their head bashed in every day or worse, by the other inmates. But of course their magical vagina excuses them of all accountability; and they'll argue "but actually he wanted it!" until they're blue in the face to avoid that accountability. Because their delicate snowflake brains can't po…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 08:52 PM
43

Reminds me of the similar "1 in 4 homeless are women" that went around not too long ago, with immediate suspicion of "that's a weird way to say 3 in 4 are men, and out of some twisted agenda aren't helping them".
/r/MensRights11/02/26 02:37 AM
8

Similar, i don't think he was much of a MRA - however some amount of his arguments did still have overlap/agreement with what Men's Rights might say. Even though we can call it out as blatant traditionalism - there is a certain attitude that things were definitely more stable, prosperous, etc. in the 1950's, than it will be in the 2050's. Whatever progress we have made - especially the last 30-40 years - hasn't felt like much progress, if anything regress. Whatever has been added to culture in t…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:10 AM
1

depends. As in, wouldn't be hard to write a british orphan girl turned spy agent with some audacious villains through some handful of missions that she uses some random tool the Tech guy gave her to win the day. I don't think they should replace James with a woman in name as well; call her Jane Bond for all I care. Go all alternate universe with it. Don't really care, but I do think it's disrespectful of the character (and author, and actors, etc) to risk stepping on their toes, just because som…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:10 AM
30

irony is it's australia; that it was only 3 mini-bottles of wine and for all intents and purposes, this was entirely the lady being stuck in her own head for 2 fucking hours. I would immediately peg her as a "my body my choice" type - in which case - his body his choice, fuck off ya cunt.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:13 AM
11

there's some irony here - that what they're saying only operates because objectification comes with implied sexual context. Which isn't really true in all cases. A WNBA player would still be objectified - not necessarily sexually - for how well she would perform on the team; how many points she could score or defend. It'd still be objectification; just out of "what can you do for the team", and not "show me your tits and nudes for $9.99/mo"
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:11 PM
1

I think the big thing is that, in 2016 with Hilary, she did win the popular vote, by about 3 million votes. Painting it the way they are, trying to frame it like "no one liked her because she was a woman, waaah!" is disingenuous to the popular vote result; and otherwise comes off as dismissive of understanding the electoral college and why we have it. Can't really pull the sexism victimhood card here. Same thing about Kamala lost cuz she's black. Well, again, no, we had Obama, and he won consecu…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 01:56 PM
21

It's kind of a conflationary point. Men do commit suicide more often, indisputably. But I don't think that has to do so much with their masculinity. It'd instead ask you to define what masculinity is first; not conflate the "men commit suicide X% more often than others" stat. The powers that be can't even define what a man or a woman is, so I'd lean toward incredible discretion on trusting a conflated statistic like this.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 05:43 AM
4

The funny thing here isn't that it happens, that is regretable and horrible for the people who end up forced through it. The sad part is, you know there's women in western culture and countries who will use that statistic to argue over their own claim of inequality; when it's like sorry hun, your 25 year old ass working for $52k average a year with a 6-figure mortgage in New York or wherever, is nothing at all like the 15 year old forced to be a sex worker, forced to marry before she's 18, and f…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 09:57 AM
17

I don't read that much; what few authors/books I trust, I keep close. However I might notice a mild trend. I have a book in The Gray Man series - it's basically spy novel, Bourne Identity-style spy novel - but the main character, Court Gentry finds himself attracted to a woman of Spanish origin. The book does the sex scene justice; it isn't outright explicit just for the sake of saying "tits and cock", it's not trying to describe the woman in a derogative/negative sense, but to give her nudity a…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 05:10 AM
0

This kind of subject comes up pretty frequently in several of the other Men's subreddits, that it's not really something that isn't talked about as much as you think it is. Just that honestly, a lot of it ends up boiling down to a few key features of relationships where the woman is asking about her man opening up. Those mostly being trust, a sense of gaining/keeping her attraction, learned behavior seeing how little support there is for men when it comes to opening up, and arguably some parts p…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 10:22 AM
55

All it really takes to confuse her is a simple question. Assume the wage gap was real; it is cheaper to pay women for the same work. Why isn't every company flocking to hire women only because they can pay them less? If she comes up with any justifiable bullshit answer - remind her, men are typically relied on to lift heavy objects; I ain't seeing no women asked to lift the weight set on the shelf at walmart. Men are typically more spatially aware; I don't see as many women working in warehouses…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:34 AM
9

I mean, depends what exact myths you're talking about. I vaguely remember a 5+ year old website that had a bunch of the stats (and links to sources) for a lot of the injustices men face in society - longer prison sentences for the same crimes, child custody battles, suicide rates, and so on and so on. But I also remember it was taken down at some point; and I'm only assuming it was because they stopped paying for the URL. I didn't bookmark it then; but it's probably tucked into some internet arc…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:42 AM
6

Sorry there were some specific parts I didn’t respond to, but I agree with Straughan and her reasons to why she’s questioning/challenging feminism and “equal rights”. I appreciate your time. Though would stress to dig deep into the history of your own ideology, and herein question whether you actually agree what the "Feminist Leadership" demands of the movement - you may find you aren't as feminist as you claim; rather perhaps more egalitarian/"true equality" than what your presupposed mentors i…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:55 AM
10

What do you think of Karen Straughan? (I'd have to dig around to find the exact quote from her on Reddit, but this is my take/paraphrasing on it...) is it really "gender equality", when Katherine Spillar, director of Feminist Majority Foundation and editor of Ms Magazine, claimed that "domestic abuse is not women beating on men, it is men beating on women"? Katherine Spillar as a voice for Feminism, basically flat out denies men can be victims of domestic abuse. is it really "gender equality" wh…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:31 AM
0

New York City and LA should not determine what Boise, Idaho, or Bismarck, North Dakota have to say. It's almost the same kind of thing as what the Senate (2 per state, regardless of population in that state) is meant for. You still have a house of representatives scaling with population - but the senate is 2 per state, period. The "job" of the Electoral College in the presidential elections, is to be "the same as" the Senate's position - the EC is still "scaling" off of population - it's why Cal…
/r/MensRights05/10/24 01:37 PM
4

What I find amusing is that there's plenty of men willing to support women with the women's issues, whether they came out of feminism or not. Men here didn't sit back and say "Women should fix women's issues!" But that's often what men hear about men's issues, with rhetoric from women & feminists arguing "Men created it, they should fix it, I'm not helping." Imagine if men didn't allow women's voting to pass through; they needed men to to that. But as soon as the discussion goes toward male suic…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 04:56 PM
42

Not Australian, but I'd take a pretty fair shot at assuming it has to do with their government installing a "Men's Behavior Change Secretary" as a way to enforce pro-Feminist ideology into policy & legislation. Can't have men going against their narrative, I guess.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 08:20 AM
4

So what? I am not your uncle, your BIL, your other uncle, your mom's brother, or your dad. This sounds very much like a "Your family is beyond fucked up and you need desperately need therapy" problem - not a "LeTs BlAmE aLl MeN fOr EvErYtHiNg!" problem.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:21 AM
1

Agree, but I'd nitpick that "Modern" feminism wasn't "created", it was a natural progression of what "Old" feminism was always going to do when it ran out of other reasonable arguments (voting, owning bank/credit accounts, etc). In a bid to stay relevant, stay in 'power', they create boogeyman problems out of Patriarchy, including nuclear family, "Toxic Masculinity", and everything else, because it's all they have left to stay relevant & in power.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 11:34 PM
9

Ignore that it's a scotsman fallacy for a moment, and look at the context. Most of the time when I hear women accuse some other group of women as "not true feminists", it usually ends up being toward some other sub-group of feminism that they don't agree with. TERF's are a prime example, where progressive/liberal feminists will see the "trans-exclusionary" part and react negatively; while TERF's look at prog/lib feminists negatively because the prog/lib feminists are willing to put (biological) …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:07 PM
19

If they meant rapists, why did they say men? Why wasn't it framed as "Would you rather be in the forest with a bear, or a rapist?" Because the question is operating on the world view that all men are rapists - not so much the assumption that we can read their minds and know their intention behind the words chosen. This should be more eye-opening to them, if they had an ounce of intelligence between them, but considering there's two women there dressing as men, I can't say I'm surprised that they…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 06:46 PM
2

The irony is, that it wouldn't be too difficult to interpret the DEI programs in such a way to bring "blue quota" to some of those career fields. Along with some extra irony that, I find it rather strange that discrimination laws and employment tend to explicitly say they won't consider gender, race, orientation, age, etc. when hiring; but honestly isn't that exactly what DEI programs do? Discriminate exactly on gender, race, orientation, age, etc? The only difference being that the outcome (get…
/r/MensRights11/08/24 04:02 AM
2

Patriarchy Not in the ways Feminism likes to claim it is. Women have virtually all the same (if not heightened) opportunities as men, and plenty of programs to enforce DEI to get women into certain positions they wouldn't be able to get were it explicitly based on merit/a meritocracy. Rape Culture Again not the way Feminism likes to claim it is. If we really were in a rape culture, we wouldn't have laws that make it illegal, and would celebrate proven rapists. We don't, and we often throw the bo…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 04:35 PM
3

As a consequence, men are more concerned with getting a yes out of women than actually seeing if she wants to do anything. Breaking news, woman says one thing, but doesn't mean it or understand consequences of her actions.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:08 PM
4

59 pages of all that, just to be unable to recognize that college & university campuses are not courthouses? The willful ignorance knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:05 PM
1

In what kind of context do you mean? Cuz this question could go all sorts of ways depending on that context. Would be like saying "Lunch was okay." - begging the question of what lunch was, and discussing ways it could be improved or what made it not 'great'.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:27 PM
3

Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, not without bending and twisting precisely what is meant by "patriarchy" to fit with a narrative. Long answer: No, with some irony that in current/modern times, there's many women fulfilling roles as business owners, member of a board/committee, and in government to determine legislation/regulation. There is some irony then that argument for the existence of the Patriarchy, is itself one set before women could vote. But that was more than a century ago. This …
/r/MensRights02/08/24 10:36 PM
3

There's the old saying from years ago that went something like "Women attempt suicide more, but men commit suicide more." It's a pretty huge difference between the "attempt" and "commit" phrasing, but it isn't like Feminists (or platforms sharing their ideals) will really acknowledge that without the rest of their supporters & donors pulling their subscriptions and so on. I wouldn't expect The Guardian to "change", even if they wanted to, because that's not where the money is (nor is it "popular…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 10:12 PM
2

the first point; this dude can't even see his own highlighted text - or insists upon misrepresenting data by adding numbers that shouldn't be added together. Depending on state, primary custody usually refers to where the child "lives" and spends the most time. When I was growing up, I saw my dad evenings 1 day a week, and every other weekend at his place. Meanwhile, joint custody is usually about decision making regarding the child; which school they go to, whether they go to summer camp, medic…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 05:40 PM
0

I agree, but not out of a sense of "women shouldn't serve the country the same way". Just that there's been some studies showing that co-ed gender units don't perform as well. In war time, do you wanna gamble on "They're kinda shit and it's because the men will fawn over the women" - or "They're men, they might not win, but they'll give it their all."? If you want to win a war, you don't send a unit that already has vulnerability. I'd be "okay" with women drafted if it meant either: A) they were…
/r/MensRights21/06/24 09:31 AM
2

I take the evolutionary biology argument about it. It never was about whether or not women were seen as weak or incapable of violence. It was always about population growth - women carry a pregnancy for ~9 months; 1 man can get several women pregnant in a given day. The bottleneck is disproportionately here on how many fertile women you have, as that functions as the limit for how much population growth you can possibly achieve. We should instead take clear stance against "benevolent sexism" - i…
/r/MensRights21/06/24 09:21 AM
1

well, you could probably train him to, but that won't mean you won't get audited.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:02 PM
16

I like the whole counter-argument for men; "Would you rather tell your feelings to a tree, or a woman?" - and the response is usually a tree. Enough men have gotten burned by opening up to women - either just giving them ammo to use next time there's some argument and she pinpoints whatever vulnerability you revealed, or otherwise end up shamed/shunned/worse for it. Which of course has a fair amount of pushback from women arguing against it, but they don't really "get" the perspective shift; for…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 11:58 AM
8

If you ask me it's less about the divorce stats, and more about each individual/subjective case. Where, there's the entire dead bedrooms sub to look at for possible causes; when it's a majority of women withholding sex from their husbands because he works 80 hour weeks to support both of them AND didn't do the dishes/clean the gutters/change the oil/etc. - it isn't so much about the resulting divorce statistic, as much as it is the unrealistic expectations of the relationship. Meanwhile, gay men…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 05:12 AM
4

It could be many things, if we also assume it would be enforced (which we all know it probably wouldn't be, or be so loose that it might as well not exist). In the US, for a lot of men, registering to vote is synonymous with registering to the draft - can't do one without the other, and in some districts, when you vote, you'll automatically be enrolled into the draft; it's conditional. So any "equal" system for women would require them to automatically sign up for the draft, equally. But we all …
/r/MensRights31/05/24 04:21 AM
7

The thing is, we can argue rational numbers and average statistics all we want, as rational men we often lean into that. But nothing about that will "answer" the irrational emotion women have been indoctrinated to believe about the average man. That all rapists are men, that all sexual assaulters are men, that all killers & murderers are men - they reverse that equation to "all men are those things". It follows, with that assumption, that your numbers of some 90-95% chance a bear will attack, ar…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:53 AM
9

It falls apart at #3 because of failing to acknowledge hypergamy, the differences that dating apps have shown with how men vs women swipe on dating apps, and so on. Not that there aren't some men that porn has "ruined" their romantic abilities - but blaming the entire system of the dating market/relationships on porn, doesn't make any sense at all. It'd be like trying to argue that your car having a burned out blinker light, is somehow responsible for the engine running well. If you argued that …
/r/MensRights27/05/24 12:20 AM
1

so, typical feminist. Gotcha. Though that last parting bit of "men dying in wars started by other men is also our fault", got me thinking about the whole shaming/griefing tactic of "You're a man, don't you feel guilt/blame because Hitler/Mao/Mussolini were also men!" -- no, not particularly. You're a woman, don't you feel guilt/blame because a woman had to give birth to Hitler, Mao, and Mussolini?
/r/MensRights26/05/24 11:52 PM
1

1st pic - so she'd pick a wild animal, over literally all/any of society. Grasping much? Or is this some other bias there isn't a name for yet (maybe cognitive or confirmation bias)? 2nd pic - honestly, just quit TikTok in general, between the content being shallow and dumb as fuck, to the comment sections being degenerate, there's quite literally nothing of value there. And this doesn't even get into any of the "Biden is gunna ban it!" politics and bullshit that it's owned by a Chinese company;…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:19 AM
14

There's a lot to wrap up in all of it. Like, I can hear Jordan Peterson claim some 12-18 variables to control for, including gender as a standalone, but then 11-17 other factors for productivity, that might "explain" some of the gender wage gap. And like Peterson has said a handful of times, when you control for ALL of those, the "real" pay gap is only like 95-99% versus the "100%" men earn. But there's the entire "other side" of the argument that goes into it that wage-gap arguments flatly igno…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 07:20 AM
8

many questions. Not about dude's death, that's absolutely tragic. But more about admission of being a feminist. In what ways would you describe your feminist aspects/feminism?
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:49 AM
49

Honestly, the chest part of the seat, wouldn't be that different than being down in the pit at a rock concert. It's only bothersome because some idiotic Gen Z decided to hot-glue a dildo to the seat, that would make it entirely uncomfortable for anyone to sit there, whether they enjoy it or not. I rather instead call for equality. Lets give the "women only seats" a 7-inch bosom to "rest" against at their backrest, and their actual seat-part have the slightest of fishlips texture. No one would fu…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:21 AM
6

Somewhat naive mathematics... 8.1 billion people on earth, divided by 2 naively (even if it would be like 51/100 vs 49/100 gender split). 2 people to procreate, otherwise it's just cloning. To the power of X, where X is generations. And somewhere, I've heard/remember that you need a maximum of 5,000 individuals (50/50 gender) to have enough genetic diversity for stability beyond that. 4,000,000,000 / (2x) = 5000 Some couple of online calculators for that return X=19.6 (about). There's some assum…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:09 AM
11

You'd think the rarity of it would encourage more severe sentences. I mean that like, there's stories of actually killing people that hit the news with some regularity, and they get whatever the justice system sentences them to. Then in the comparatively rare instance a serial killer gets caught, they lock'em up and throw away the key.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:02 PM
2

I'm in the US. I'm not a lawyer. First off, my advice would be to find a lawyer, who specializes in employer negligence/ACAS violation settlements, and get in contact with them. This works if your partner can provide verifiable evidence that he damn near died (the one incident), or other evidence that they're skipping some amount of safety regulations (not strapping the pallets down on a vehicle that goes on a roadway). I suspect trying to prosecute this as a "discrimination" case would get dism…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:13 AM
1

Probably the most frustrating thing is that they'll launch an inquiry, and like the other highest voted comment says, still find a way to "blame the boys" for not performing well; they'll all the same be blind to the sexist bias against men in virtually all levels of education; whether it's the teachers exercising that bias, or it's the government lacking scholarships/grants intended for exclusively boys, to the overall lack of male teachers even before MeToo and that itself being one that resul…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:50 PM
1

Not religious - but I think it's worth acknowledging that faith (not necessarily just Christianity) has offered a degree of stability that allowed for civilization to thrive; I don't think we'd be where we are today, if it weren't for some of the ways faith gave people living centuries ago a sense of structure, discipline, order, or purpose. I would acknowledge some amount of that stability came out of Christianity (or whatever faith) spelling out distinctive roles for that society's/civilizatio…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:53 PM
7

Rape is one of those specific topics that asks, if not demands, defining the term. Rape by a penis? Virtually all laws include that. Rape by object insertion, most include that. Rape that is simply non-consensual, and allows for men to be raped even if not penetrated? Not many include that. This is where it ends up needing that definition - if we define rape as any non-consensual, forced sex, penetrative or not, then we'd likely see a fair amount more of women being perpetrators. But because of …
/r/MensRights16/03/24 02:50 AM
1

they're so desperate to avoid being seen as the man hating cult they are, that they make up shit just to make themselves feel better. Sounds about on-par with the Feminist Manifesto.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 09:31 AM
2

depends what kind of data sources you want to use for any/all of it, but at least in the 'concept', a lot of the jobs men are doing that can, and unfortunately for them do end up with fatal consequences, are far from as "protected" as women are in pregnancy/child birth. maybe relevant is the cdc paper on it; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/maternal-mortality/2021/maternal-mortality-rates-2021.htm measured with https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr020.pdf It's 2021 data, but 1205 women die…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 09:41 AM
4

Not gonna agree on it as it's a bit of a non-equivalent comparison (literally, violent rapist, versus anti-male/feminist ideology being equated is apples and oranges). To frame the "problem" with the comparison in another way - I've never personally known a man who has been convicted of rape (emphasis on the word usage, convicted, not accused). On the flipside, my mom, my sister, a couple of my aunts, several of my female cousins, and many, many female coworkers I've worked with, are or have bee…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 08:36 PM
1

The thing that stands out to me is the "shouldn't judge anyone on their past" line. Like how would that actually work as a philosophy, if we applied it society-wide? Are we suddenly not going to prosecute serial killers because a judge would be denied "judging them for their past" of murdering a bunch of people? Are we not going to seek restitution and compensation from a car thief that stole a bunch of cars over a period of 12 months, because we "shouldn't judge them for their past"? We shouldn…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:34 PM
3

Needs source/data, or as seen in the rest of your responses, you'll get encouraged to provide such source/data, or get laughed out of town. Another user did provide links to stats & data, and shows that men, in fact, do suffer greater risk of victimhood of violent crimes. Your insistence that "but provoked vs unprovoked!" makes it come off as a cope, when the numbers of it are 306 male victims to 89 female victims, I don't even know how you can justify your stance of provoked vs unprovoked, when…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 05:52 PM
2

Curious where you got the 7-10 year figure, as what google brings up for me is a maximum federal sentence for perjury being 5 years, with some advisory sentencing (meaning, the average/typical) closer to 15-21 months, for perjury alone. With the extra thing that a judge assigning the sentencing probably isn't going to think it's "that bad" for 1 person to lie about something that only effected 1 other person. They aren't going to prosecute Stacy lying about Chad to the full extend of the federal…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:41 PM
2

Well... Number 1 Can you name 1 country where 1 in 3 men will be raped or sexually assaulted by women? I would argue that in virtually all modern countries, men convicted of, and proven to be rapists, face severe time in prison; we are not a "rape culture" due to the frequency, and we are not a "rape culture" because the majority of modern societies abhor the crime of rape to an extreme. I would argue that there are many instances of women sexually assaulting men, but never face charges for inap…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 05:41 AM
1

I'm waiting for you to suggest that the prostate be an external organ too, as it's involved with male genitalia as well.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 10:33 AM
3

There's the technicality of free speech in America - it was only ever intended so that the government couldn't imprison or ostracize critics of the government. It does not, and has not, meant anyone is actually free to say whatever they want, without consequence, from any other individual, business, or society as a whole. It's where the argument of "but free speech means I should be able to say whatever I want on whatever platform I want!" - well, yes, you can, but don't be surprised if Twitter …
/r/MensRights16/01/24 11:42 PM
6

There's an older Jordan Peterson interview where the discussion went toward conflict resolution and how it's handled differently between men, and between women. The summary idea was that, men tend to favor resolving conflict through physical means - eg: if another man offends you to a severe degree, it's understood that there is a certain risk of it escalating to a fist fight. Meanwhile women tend to favor resolving conflict through what amounts to reputation destruction - they'll spread rumors …
/r/MensRights16/01/24 05:47 PM
4

all women in this room have had to act different in front of a man Perhaps; but so too have men had to act different in front of women. Perhaps more so in the wake of Me Too, and how many men, especially in professional settings, preferring not to be alone in a room with a woman, as all it takes is one accusation to screw men over. Men are a protected class Needs explanation; how are men a protected class? What can men do that women can't? We don't need to look much further than Ukraine, to see …
/r/MensRights14/01/24 06:08 PM
9

just searched it myself; and "reddit mra" has some handful of other subs, somewhere down a few hits it has the actual r/mra sub, which is apparently a matchbox racing association sub; either that or magnetic resonance angiography? Kind of giggled at that one, tbh; though the sub itself is literally just 2 threads. Some handful of other, askmen, feminists, etc. links above that. Instead, "reddit mensrights", and this sub pops up at the top. Not that swapping your primary search engine is bad or a…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:29 PM
5

I think the hinge of it that stands out as "What does that actually mean?" is the line about "emotional infidelity" - both in the text message comment, and within the linked article. By that I mean, a woman could simply dream her husband cheated, and kick him to the couch for the night, knowing full well it was a god damn dream, and the man had done nothing wrong. That one little line of emotional infidelity does a lot to make the rest of the data not matter; it isn't about the data, it's about …
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:59 PM
2

I responded to another topic in the past couple weeks that was about this - and basically, while I agree that Men/Fathers should have access to paper abortion if they don't want the kid, I don't think it'd be something either the court system or the politicians/tax-paying public would enjoy. The crux of it being that, if paper abortion was a thing, they'd would probably also add some extra stipulations (for both men or women) that would enforce hysterectomies/vasectomies after X amount of aborti…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:09 AM
20

Lets say a person did some drunk driving and got caught. They should be held accountable. Or they got drunk and committed manslaughter. Being drunk isn't an excuse. But somehow, magically, for one gender only, being drunk is an excuse to sexually assault. Make it make sense.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 04:03 AM
8

I mean, in an absolute vacuum, there's been some amount of research to suggest the human brain isn't done really developing until around 25. Meanwhile, us folks in the US are authorizing driver's licenses to 16 year olds. This is without taking into account gender, which only further screws things up in terms of age-related responsibility/privilege given out. I agree with the point you're trying to make; about how young women tend to be innocent especially due to their youth, but young men tend …
/r/MensRights06/01/24 06:02 AM
7

One thing to maybe point out, the gay subs are almost all dominated by leftist/liberal politics. Saw one the other day about saying how they'd never date a guy who was republican. If you're gay and don't agree with their political alignment, expect some friction there - or if you're gay, and just want some other side of the gay-political arguments, try r/gayconservative
/r/MensRights30/12/23 04:52 AM
12

I gave the video a shot until around the 1:15 mark. Not that I disagree with whatever he was reacting to, but purely out of content creation standards. I mean that like - there's no audio for his own response, it's just GTA-font text, so if I wanted to listen to it instead of watch it, then that whole part is lost. Then there's the whole editing side of things like, the women's audio is sped up by at least 40% which means if I'm not actively listening to it, I'm not really hearing what they're s…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:00 AM
2

it's a subreddit for "unexpected" - and the video showed the one guy not really getting up and cheering, not being really exuberant, and the other guy being all into the game. The more excited guy ended up being the one who killed himself. This is what made it unexpected; the expectation was the obviously depressed and indifferent guy would have done it, not the excited guy. We can only guess why it was removed; speculating on it doesn't get you anywhere, but if we're going to entertain speculat…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:59 AM
16

Paper abortions would be a nice option for men who didn't willingly choose to be the father. And the argument about it being the "equivalent" of a woman getting an abortion because she wasn't willing to go through with the rest of the pregnancy/be a mother, is valid. But in relatively objective terms, you'd never get the state to sign on for it. The state doesn't want to pay for Stacy's 8th child with a boyfriend - or rather, they'd pass this along as a tax fee to the general population, and vir…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:46 AM
3

Feminists like to play the oppression olympics, even when it isn't a "good thing" to be "the most lonely", they'll fight tooth and nail to take anything they can from men, even when it's something as negative as loneliness. And then they'll turn around and try to flex this as a point of why/how we should prioritize attention toward women over men - to the point of neglecting any/all of the issues men are facing. This has been their playbook for the last, oh, roughly 50 years, if not longer. It's…
/r/MensRights28/12/23 11:05 AM
3

what Mens rights means to you? In a word, egalitarianism. Describing that, where egalitarianism (men's rights) would seek to address and fix the issues that disproportionately affect men, or exclusively affect men. This covers a broad range of topics, whether it's about circumcision or paternity fraud, or male suicide & homelessness to the supposed wage gap. Discussing each issue under it's association with Men's Rights isn't really "doable" without turning the response into an essay. I'll be ho…
/r/MensRights27/12/23 01:37 AM
7

Mostly from growing up with 2 sisters. One sister was the "wears many masks" type - she could play the ditzy cheerleader to seduce the jock she had a crush on in high school; and also be the boss bitch that dominated on her volleyball team & track & field division/events. It was part of the "many masks" that I disagreed with; less so now than when we were growing up. When we were younger, I had to question everything she'd ever say as "Who is she today? Is she the ditzy cheerleader? Is she the b…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 09:48 PM
3

Sounds suspiciously like the same kind of woman that would be crying on tiktok about where all the good men are; without having the ability to step back, take her own ego out of it, and see how her own ideology could be a factor to blame for it. As in, she's saying "ALL men are ALL rapists ALL the time, it's saved my life thinking this!" - okay now lets source that. Feminism has been telling women they don't need no man for the last 20+ years, though the overall sentiment in different phrasing g…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:56 AM
4

Have you heard the saying "It isn't what they say, it's what they don't say"? That... sort of applies here. The data and metrics available I don't think anyone would argue against. Yes, men do over-represent the statistics of violent crime. Yes, men who have gone to war have experience (and/or committed) more violence through combat, and maybe that is part of a "men are more violent" argument. But what they're not saying, is about the conclusion and implication. "The majority of violent crimes a…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:38 AM
1

In general terms, data helps us. This isn't any different, if you wanted a data source, particularly a published/scientific paper about violent crime and who commits it/how much of the population commits it. But in context sensitive terms? MRA's biggest opponents already have trouble distinguishing just how few men (relative to total male and total overall population) actually run the world, all the while crying about how "All men run the world!" So I think you might find limited usefulness of t…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 10:16 AM
6

Fairly minor, but probably my 6th grade home room teacher - he was the social studies/history teacher at my gradeschool for 5th-8th grade. He was the kind of guy who, after learning my parents were divorcing, gave me extra time to get big projects done. And became a role model for what a good man, a good husband, and doting father, could be. Which is more than what the other female teachers were doing; who didn't give a shit whatever I was going through, they were going to teach that algebra and…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 09:29 AM
30

The really poignant part is with the washing machine. Bitch please, you spent 5 minutes grabbing the hamper, going into the room with the washing machine, dumping it in there, dumping in some detergent, and pushing a couple buttons and waiting an hour. If they have a snazzy washer-dryer combo, they went back an hour later, pushed a couple more buttons to put it in dryer mode, and walked away for another hour. And yet they're trying to equate this to about 2 hours of work at the factory/the shop/…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 09:03 AM
2

I think if it's "true" evil, that there is some amount of "informed intent" involved with defining that. By that, I mean like, I'd describe a woman like Katherine Spillar as "evil", absolutely. She literally doesn't believe domestic abuse against men is even possible, along with encouraging a lot of other blatantly anti-male rhetoric. She has, is, and probably will, continue to dehumanize and antagonize men and the male condition, particularly as she has vested business interest to do so through…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:42 AM
3

responding to response... because they don't give a shit. How are we measuring the degree to which anyone "gives a shit"? A lot of MRA's, particularly conservative and/or religious MRA's, see the current paradigm of society, and has centuries worth of history to look back on, that it's on at least a partial, if not major, downward trend. Rome didn't fall in a day, but we can look toward it to see all sorts of red flags that contributed toward it's fall. We could argue, we give more of a shit, fo…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 10:22 PM
8

In short - because Feminism has always been about arguing what women deserve rights/privileges to, that most (not necessarily all) men had. There is a much longer response, but it'd take like an hour or two to actually verify some of the data points, dates/timestamps, and so on, but it still, almost always, comes down to Feminists coveting the rights/privileges men have had. Some minor extension of this, is that they are typically myopic, blind to the fact that they have already achieved (relati…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 09:28 PM
7

Kind of a minor thing, but Twitch only has around 140 million active user accounts. Youtube has more like 2.4 billion, with a b. Twitch only has accounts for about 2% of the global population, if we assume 1 account for 1 person, and you can be absolutely sure that some folks on Twitch have alt accounts, and this metric is only measuring whether they logged into an account once per month. Youtube has enough accounts for about 30% of the population; again it has an issue of some percentage being …
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:53 AM
5

Something I didn't see much commented on, but from my observations with the women in my family... ... is that several of them went to college for one degree or another, and after they have the piece of paper that says they're smart and graduated, they go out to find work, which likely ends up not being work they actually "wanted to do with their degree". One female relative got a doctorate in psychiatry and a minor in archaeology; she ended up becoming a groundskeeper for the college she went to…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 09:45 PM
1

Your premise seems a bit weak; saying "it was birth control pills that did it!" doesn't make sense, as there are/were other contraceptive options available, the big obvious one being condoms made of animal intestine used in antiquity, but there's also been century-plus-year-old spermicides used too that wouldn't necessarily be "up to the man" to use. So assuming "birth control allowed them to be promiscuous" is only weak because what was stopping women from using spermicides before birth control…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:50 PM
1

Depends on what degree of "push against us" you're talking about; or really, what kind of society you'd prefer. As in, I do think there's baby steps and snail's-pace changes that are slowly improving men's lives. Not that there isn't still a lot wrong about the relative equality between the genders, and how much of it that exclusively impacts men is simply ignored by society at large; there are growing pockets that acknowledge there are exclusively men's issues that need addressing, that society…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:28 AM
7

Generally I'm just kind of tired of "but I went through/go through pregnancy, therefore I'm more important!" style arguments. The point of hardship is rather dismissive of the supportive partners/husbands who do take care of the mother of their child while she's pregnant; saying men can't understand that hardship is a frustratingly simple and plainly "not always true" argument. Similar with pain management during pregnancy/child birth; they're acting like no man has ever had a kidney stone, gott…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 05:28 AM
2

Citing your other response (both = feminism and religion/gods/superstitions) I would tend to agree. But that's about as far as the discussion here can go because both your OP and your responses are short. Emphasis on the I would agree with you, both are false. But I would also assume my reasoning to believe they are false is different - you haven't given any real discussion points about why you think feminism is false, or religion, just stating them outright. Unless all you're looking for is bla…
/r/MensRights23/10/23 10:47 PM
3

Define "both". From the topic title, I'd assume one is religion/faith. But I don't wanna put a ton of effort into a response without knowing what exactly you're talking about.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 09:52 PM
4

The argument is attacking the credibility of "must protect mother, wife, daughter", where there is no guarantee that any of those 3 people have respected the man in question. It would mostly fall toward the mother & wife for abuse, as a generalization. But extrapolating from it - if the mother, wife, and daughter, all don't respect you; or only abuse you (in any way, not just sexual or physical, perhaps emotional or financial), are they worth protecting? I would sooner expect any man who has gon…
/r/MensRights23/10/23 05:25 AM
11

to put it in words... Sniperwolf is a react channel. Most of it is vapid content, she rarely if ever credits the original creator, and most of it is looking at her big dumb face with "Wow!" expression. Jacksfilms is a channel that often criticizes other media; YT's react content is no exception. He has pointed out other creators for their relative "abuse" of the Fair Use clause, because simply putting their face and "Wow!" over a video is not really ticking the "Must be transformative" part of F…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 10:08 PM
2

IMO - conscription opinion is subjective. Like there's a reason WW2 was a "popular war", and Vietnam was not. There's a reason why so many people enlisted into the US military after 9/11, but we're not really setting up a draft to go fight in Ukraine or Israel/Palestine. I'm "okay" with conscription when there's a clear and present danger to my country. If I were Ukrainian, I agree it would suck to get conscripted to fight Russia - but as the saying goes, "Your are not obligated to like your job…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:58 AM
4

It's a complex topic, and you're basically asking for arm-chair internet experts for a reason. I shouldn't have to say it, but expect some biases and opinions you may not agree with, because it's such a complex topic and so few of us are really "qualified" to answer it outside of our subjective life experiences. That said. whenever the topic comes up it always has something to do with women. This is quite the assertion and assumption. I would say a guy really interested in sports, fitness, cars,…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:56 AM
4

To me, it seems more like men's rights has become conflated with being center/right, and that is what has lead to such pushback and censorship about men's rights. It's become a case where, if arguing anything against the Left or Feminism, then somehow you must be a radicalized right-winger incel. These are the same 'types' of people who would argue "women's rights are human rights!" - then scoff and mock "men's rights are human rights!", all the while failing to see their own hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 11:09 PM
25

Old guy has some points, but ultimately... ... the military has enough data points to show that female recruits do enough to disrupt a unit of all males, such that they defer to the woman in their unit. It does enough to disrupt mixing coed units, because the chances of success are flat out lower when horned up 18-30 year olds are hoping to get in bed with the woman in their squad. All things considered, a "female draft" would still almost guaranteed prefer to assign those women to relatively "s…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 06:50 AM
48

well, the first 10 seconds have her screaming for men to die alone. Nothing of value was lost not hearing the rest of it.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 06:04 AM
9

seems to be arbitrary. One of the mottos, at least in the MGTOW community, has been "We don't recruit, we just watch them arrive." Making a manifesto would be analogous to recruiting. Doesn't mean there can't or shouldn't be such a document, but I'm not sure how much good it would do. Nevermind that several point-by-point posts have already been created; use the search bar.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 04:38 AM
3

Moving it "meritocratically" like you're suggesting only moves the goalposts. Age, gender, race, are immutable, individual characteristics. Employment, in this climate, is a coin flip. Civic prospects, kind of depends on how you define civility. Education prospects, in this climate, weighs it toward people who would already be in control of education (also, unironically, a lot of left-leaning ideologues - and generally I don't think you'd end up with as "pure" of voting if you required all voter…
/r/MensRights14/10/23 02:39 AM
3

Is this a post in favor of religious morality, posing as an anti-feminist/pro-MRA post? Because that's what it sounds like. In which case, there's other subreddits for you to post in.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:40 AM
3

I don't think about the roman empire every day, as in the literal roman empire. But it's about that time of year where I take a step back and think about things in our society that came from the Roman empire - even tangentially. Like our calendar. If we're going by the etymology, September should be the 7th month, October the 8th month, November the 9th month, and December the 10th month - that's part of what the Sept, Oct, Nov, and Dec parts of those words is "supposed to mean" - but instead we…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:56 PM
5

One of the things I point out rarely, is that it's analogous to talking about "lets cure cancer!" - okay, great, fine, extremely unreasonable if you have a clue about how cancer works, but that's not the point. The point is that you can't talk about curing cancer without using the word cancer. Saying "disease" would assume all kinds of other diseases that aren't cancer, or "syndrome" would similarly apply to all kinds of things that aren't cancer, you get the point. Applying this analogy, we can…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:50 AM
6

Just sounds like a more 'recent' iteration of the case against Bill Crosby, except instead of 30+ year old complaints, it's 10-ish year old complaints. We have enough studies from psychology regarding memory to know to memory is not set in stone; what you remember from 10 years ago might not have happened as you remember it. This is enough to cast doubt on the claims, arguably reasonable doubt, without any other corroborating evidence. In the Cosby case, that would have been getting bloodwork & …
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:43 AM
3

One of the very few positives about Feminism, was that their arguing for the right to vote back in the suffragette days, also got disenfranchised men (eg: men who did not own land, or who recently immigrated) the right to vote as well. That's, as far as I am concerned, the only real "positive" thing that Feminism has done in the "actual" name of equality - with the big giant asterisk, that it wasn't about Suffragettes arguing the case for disenfranchised men, as much as it was the politicians at…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:45 AM
10

I agree as a concept. Men lack reproductive autonomy, relative to women; women in many states can simply abort the child, with or without the input or authority of the father, and that's that. However. It's also the kind of thing that, if Men/would-be-Fathers are given that option, then we'd necessarily expect increased taxes incurred from higher rate of welfare/social assistance programs from new single-mothers. In this regard I consider it analogous to the train wreck that has become Affordabl…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:23 AM
2

This so heavily depends on age group. I'd understand the insecurity more if I compare my 18-25 year old self to an 18-25 year old date. But I'm closing in on 40. If I'm going to stick to a generic -5/+3 age range, I literally can't expect a 35-43 year old woman hasn't had sex before, with potentially several serious, multi-year relationships and/or marriages. I'd count myself lucky if her 1-4+ kids didn't turn her into a hotdog-down-a-hallway situation. Ultimately for me, not worth fussing over,…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 09:51 AM
4

and two of five people believe that men make better business executives than women do. what about the other three? Oh right, if we word the rest of it just right, they can still drive the exact kind of outrage response they want to create, instead of anyone capable of critical analysis asking the question. I haven't read the article or anything but I'd suspect the other 3 are a split between 1 (or 2) thinking women would be better business exec's, and 1 (or 2) being undecided/not have a strong o…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:48 PM
3

at least according to the disclaimer in the image, this is on X/twitter, not reddit.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:54 PM
18

There's no shortage of instances where men have stories about being emotional or crying in front of their girlfriend/wife. And despite all the 'It's okay honey, you can cry around me' - it also comes with some amount of those same men getting into an argument later and having that display of emotion weaponized against them. Women are just as capable of being "toxic" as men are, and that's what needs to stop. It isn't even a patriarchy or "toxic masculinity" thing, as some women are just as much …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:51 PM
18

There was some other post I remember seeing in the last week that was critical of the movie, not for any of it's actual content or scenes, but because of all the rest of Barbie related criticism. In the sense that, Barbie is a perfect/idealized woman, has a perfect body, has any job/career she wants, owns several houses. Barbie used to be criticized as "part of the problem" just for how perfect she was, despite being a fantasy, right alongside patriarchy and everything else. But now we have a mo…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:24 PM
1

Sounds like your professor would be (or would have been) one of the folks boycotting the documentary when it had it's limited theatrical release. Tons of feminists at the time slammed the movie for being anti-women, even though it was made by a self-identified feminist who realized that ideology wasn't really truth or honest, or that (average) men are systematically oppressed as much if not more than women are. I'd say though to keep your head down and just nod & smile to pass the course - it's …
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:17 AM
3

Most of my work has been in factories and on factory floors, in all kinds of various industries. Across all of the factories, the biggest annoyance that becomes pretty immediately noticeable is how the women will tend to get assigned to lighter/easier work and/or quality control/quality assurance work more than the men. There was one factory where the machine was making about 4-5lb plastic components that would house the rest of the product we were making, only men got assigned to that machine. …
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:06 PM
2

Probably the only best thing you can do is call them out on it, echoing that sentiment from another upvoted response - it is, more or less, the go-to canned reaction to topics asking your kind of question; it's about the best you can do, mostly to be a woman's voice among woman speaking for men, call them out on their shit. Taking it a step farther, though, it can be through any number of analogies dependent on context. Like lets say it's belittling, with the context about "he has small dick ene…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:10 AM
6

The Mens Lib subreddit, by it's very own sidebar, claims it is a pro-feminist sub. Not really sure what you were expecting or the why/how you're reacting with such outrage over what sounds like a male feminist participating in an AMA within a pro-feminist subreddit. Sounds like the guy simply played the tune that was asked of him. If anything it holds out hope that Mens Lib isn't completely degenerate feminism, what with how you say folks called him out on it. But it's still feminist enough that…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:27 PM
1

If this is still on-going, I'd wager you should check in with your state/country's laws about recording without consent, cuz just on the admission of the boy and the daughter that kicked him, you have quite an abuse case building between them, where the fault would fall on the mother herself for allowing, arguably even encouraging, such an abusive environment. Not that I suspect it would go anywhere, but under threat of CPS taking her children from her (and/or visitation of her son? the way you …
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:40 PM
2

Two things stood out to me in the article. The first being that they deny that Barbieland is a matriarchy. Excuse me what? Every position of power was held by a Barbie, and the Kens were only accessories to the Barbies. It is a gender-swapped version of patriarchy, y'know, that loosely defined "men have all the positions of power and women are disadvantaged because of it" thing that Feminism shoves down people's throats. How is it not matriarchy? The second being that, at the end of the article,…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 04:59 PM
1

That's a very different argument. This woman willingly chose to smuggle drugs, and the country she's smuggling them into has extreme consequences for it. This isn't "she was just unlucky to be born there" - she chose to engage with drugs, agreed to smuggle them, got caught, and is facing the same extreme consequences as others before her. As soon as we include the concept of it being her choice to engage in this activity, is when the "bad luck to be born there" falls apart.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 04:49 PM
19

For just a second, lets pull back from the whole outrage and response issue about "OMG execute a woman, how dare they!" The bitch was smuggling heroin. In a country trying to exercise it's authority to restrict rampant drug use. End of story. That country has it's own sovereignty, and right to exercise laws with punishments, just like the US, the UK, (etc), do. And we mostly don't get involved in each other's judicial systems - but here this humanitarian group is, trying to interfere in the sove…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:14 AM
251

Sometimes when women scream patriarchy at me without knowing anything about me, it feels very abusive. It’s also socially acceptable apparently. Nod and smile, then exit the theatre. That movie is/was/was always going to be, a propaganda film about how great it is to be a woman, with whatever minimal emotional outbursts they have that don't actually amount to fuck all. Barbie might have been an astronaut and managed multiple properties, but did she ever risk her own life on a battlefield? Was sh…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:52 AM
1

What comes to mind is two people. You've already got another user responding about Karen Straughan with a link to one of her more 'famous' reddit posts, the context for that post was arguing against a feminist that "wasn't like the other feminists" or "I'm a real feminist, not those other people!" - but goes at length to point out the various organizations and leadership of Feminism that are very blatantly anti-male. Very worth a read, because for all that Feminism likes to claim it's a tool for…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:52 AM
3

subjective at best. I go outside pretty often to have a smoke, and notice there's the neighbor with MS riding his little cart around, and the dude across the street staring at his car/doing whatever also. I see more guys walking up and down my street than women - whether it just be for exercise or they want to walk to one of the 24/7 gas stations/kwik-e-marts - than women, who will more often have some other "excuse" to be out and about, like walking their dog, or pushing a stroller along. My ci…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 11:20 PM
180

There's some obvious double-standards here, where a guy who had MGTOW links in his browser history goes on a rampage, and ends up getting that subreddit banned, to the AWDTSG ladies somehow still allowed to maintain their little hate group, with some minor amount of progress being pushed for to get rid of them on certain platforms even before this debacle. Where's the equality? If they're all on about "oh but misogyny kills!" - well here's a prime example of how misandry kills too. Cut the fucki…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 11:17 PM
1

If I had to guess? Because so much of what Feminists want - bodily autonomy, reproductive autonomy, among a few other things - is restricted by the most extreme and literal translation/perception/transliteration of the Bible. When Feminists hear that the bible tells women to either "submit" or "obey" their husbands, they roll in their graves - both current and past. The same can be seen from some amount of other (usually Abrahamic) religions, that suggests if not tells women to submit/obey their…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:36 AM
6

But what about the starving kids in Africa? /s I don't disagree it's to preempt denial of an issue; but more often than not it's just the mechanism for straw-man fallacies. When it's something about an argument they know they aren't "as strong as" the counter-argument, they turn instead to "whataboutism" as a means to redirect the focus to something they can, or would, have a stronger/better argument on. In this case, that instead of argue about feminists abusing their partners, that there's sta…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 10:29 PM
9

Was going to mention the european queens thing, because all it takes is like 10 seconds to search it online. Pretty apparent the person OP was arguing with was taking anything they (Feminists, probably) had said without any amount of critical thinking or doing their own research to find out something at least closer to truth.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:50 PM
2

Those can both be very true, though I'd still tend toward what I said. The "Unofficially, somebody might see the simplest solution as removing you from the workplace" would be the "get ahead of it, if you trust your boss, talk to them". And then also, the "If that cost exceeds the value you bring" part, relates to how the jobs I've worked in the past, the value I brought to the company was more than "Oh, about once or twice a year his mom has some big surgery" thing. The rest of the year, I was …
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:40 PM
2

My father has said he will only get thyroid removal surgery after I marry. That is emotional abuse - he's holding his own health hostage on the condition that you do something he wants. This makes less than zero sense; and your father is an idiot for doing this to you. If my father repeatedly calls my office and says that he wishes to talk to me and I deny it, will it lead to a bad visibility and image? How should I tackle the situation in a way that my promotion is not impacted? I can't speak f…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 08:59 AM
17

If you ask me, it's not that marriage is unsustainable for a stable society. Somewhat ironically, for a long time, marriage rates were a part of predicting financial stability & success within a society; I recall one of Karen Straughan's YT videos suggesting as much and her rationale for it made sense. It's that, for all it's efforts to dismantle the patriarchy, Feminism shot themselves in the foot for all the legislative privilege they pushed for (and got) regarding divorces, child support & cu…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 09:33 PM
7

Whoever you were arguing with has a clear misunderstanding of how (some) of the laws we have, varying by country/state/jurisdiction, ended up becoming laws in the first place. When they are designing (or amending) the law, that's where intent comes in. It's the intent of saying "You know, no one even rides horses downtown, maybe we should amend the "No horse shall be tied to a post in front of a saloon" law, because we also don't technically have saloons either, we have bars." Without it going t…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 09:39 AM
16

“More likely to underachieve at school; to fail to go on to further education; to be medicated for destructive behaviour; to make up the majority of the prison population and the homeless; to be addicted to drugs; to die earlier – including by suicide. Well at least she acknowledges those. Honestly by the paragraph before that (or it being GQ in general), I'm surprised she didn't go on to blame men for all those things regardless, and expect a 50/50 coin flip that she even mentions anything (in …
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:39 AM
3

Censorship is one thing. And I agree it shouldn't be used as much as it is just to silence people. It's not like anyone goes around in real life, with a roll of tape in their pockets to cover the mouths of people who say offensive things. People are/should be free to say whatever they want. Just that it's more than just moderators keeping spam under control. Some of the brigading that this (and other Men's subs) has endured has involved not just spam, but spam of child porn. Some depraved indivi…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:08 PM
18

It isn't even just this sub. A Voice For Men is a website that Feminism pretty routinely attacks (both the website, and the people running it), and in the past several years has articles with titles like "Why gay men don't need feminism" Here's a link. https://avoiceformen.com/feminism/why-gay-men-dont-need-feminism-part-1-challenging-assumptions/ I'm not sure if they ever got around to publishing part 4, but it's still relevant/recent enough that it's worth a read.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 10:18 AM
15

It's unfortunate what you went through, and honestly a travesty of the education system and how badly it is doing it's prescribed service to the youth. In any attempt to explain where it comes from, is from both social and legislative issues. Social, as another response mentioned, how kids are taught "Boys can't hit girls" - but no one is there to tell the girls that "Girls can't hit boys, either". For as hell bent as The Left is on gender-neutralizing so many things, they still seem to keep thi…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 10:12 AM
21

The thing I liked about what/how mgtow's old subreddit worked, was pretty much literally on their commonly said phrase - "we don't recruit, we just watch them arrive." If anything, for pretty much all the things you said OP, Feminism does a better job of "radicalizing" boys and young men against Feminism, better than any cluster in the manosphere could. There's some of the "lessons" that some men just won't learn from others, until it happens to them, and by feminism (or by extension, things fem…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 11:17 AM
23

Kind of funny that this article uses Musk and Zuckerberg to get the clickbait, and then at around the halfway point, turns into a "But Andrew Tate" fest. For a man they hate so much, they sure do like letting him live rent-free in their heads, and giving him free advertising.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 11:42 PM
13

What's that I hear? They aren't strong or independent or need no man, and that they in fact are dependent on, and need a man, coupled with being too weak to recognize they need to work for themselves?! I'm impressed, DeSantis. Maybe not enough to vote for you, but enough to be pleased that perhaps any other states with insane alimony legislation will reform them - hopefully severely if not abolish them - by your lead.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 11:16 PM
4

It helps keep legal matters sorted while ensuring your finances and parental rights are in order. Hahahahaha. Oh wait. She's serious. even more laughter 1 Why Get The Government Involved Because that's the legality of it all, except in the growing amount of 'common law' marriages that don't need government involvement for a couple to be treated as though they were married, whether they were or not. About the only real benefit that the individual man has here, anymore, from marriage, is that they…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 11:48 PM
2

It's ridiculous, yes. And if we take the whole equality/equity thing to extremes, the recent trans folk (or claiming to be trans) mass shooters, has not equaled the same immediate vilification of/demonization of the trans movement, somewhat cynically & ironically demonstrates just how "anti-cis-het-male" the current zeitgeist is.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 09:43 AM
3

Long story short - There was some ex-military guy that shot up a crowd, a public/mass shooting. The FBI/federal investigation found links to the MGTOW subreddit (and likely other MGTOW related sites) in his browser history. That detail got leaked, and made it's way to the mass media, who then went out of their way to paint MGTOW as a "violent, misogynist group who are terrorists." After that event, the MGTOW subreddit got quarantined. And near as I could tell at the time, mentioning that ex-mili…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:15 AM
6

So my question is, why do women ignore all these men? Because they don't stand to gain - and in some of the issues, only stand to lose - some privilege or advantage over men. Can rephrase the question to "understand" that a bit better - "What do women have to gain from helping men's rights issues?" And many of the issues, whether that's about regulating child support or actually giving fair, 50/50 custody, only means they stand to "lose" privileges and benefits that either affords them. This ext…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 11:12 PM
5

Frankly - the US federal government has made it illegal to pay any gender any differently for the same work. But you're not going to get enough of the nuanced reasons why "men make more money at this company". Are the men working more hours? Probably, on average men work something like 42-43 hours a week, and women on average are closer to 37-38 a week. Makes sense the men working more hours would be compensated for their time. Are the men actually doing harder work? In factories I've seen this …
/r/MensRights22/06/23 08:35 PM
3

What's that one statistic, women make something like 80% of the household purchases? How are they surprised by "bearing the brunt" of rising prices when they are the ones doing the majority of purchases? It isn't that inflation is gendered - it's that consumerism is; it's been this way for long enough for researchers to study it enough to spit out a generalized statistic about gendered household spending differences.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 08:04 PM
46

What, so if we're actually doing things for equality here, then male reporters should be given access to the women's locker rooms after the game, right? Right? Oh of course not, because of privacy and modesty and basic respect, and all of it wrapped up in how prude our country is. What pisses me off more is how they attack/vilify the usher - dude didn't know, and opted for the side of caution until someone above his pay grade gave him (and those reporters) the authorization. He's not paid enough…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:49 PM
1

I can only say it about my previous employer; and that it wasn't really a set-in-stone policy. However, a male coworker was having his 4th kid and they approved time off for him up to 2 weeks. Not sure if it was paid time off, or some negotiated "he gets half wage" kind of thing, or if he used precious vacation time for it; I didn't press for details other than knowing he had up to 2 weeks. He ended up only being gone for 5 business days around a non-working weekend; so basically a week to spend…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 12:00 PM
5

"Gender based violence" - except against men, especially cis, het, men, they're still viable targets for violence of any type, means, or from any source whether social, federal, or foreign.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 05:39 AM
3

I didn't even see that, good catch.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:56 AM
233

"Are the handcuffs needed, I'm a good child." Yeah no, no, no you aren't, not by a long shot, and if you're willing to murder your own brother for reasons as of yet unknown, we can only guess what you'd do to people you aren't even related to. What's perhaps more frustrating here is do a search on that article for "father". The only mentions are on it's sidebar/other articles. Single mom? Likely. Literally no mention of whatever the father was doing, where he was, or what his response to it woul…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 04:50 AM
2

So, on the one hand, no one should be held or kept in a relationship they don't want. But on the other hand, if that's what they want to do, they shouldn't swear upon their soul to cherish and to love, in sickness and in health, for better or worse, that they will abide by marriage. Something's gotta give between those two - either stop getting married, flat out, because you don't want to get trapped in a relationship you no longer want; OR; actually uphold the vow you swore by. The only other a…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 04:13 AM
2

better save than sorry; include it. Cmon man, you should know some/many men will take things (particularly text) explicitly literally. (slight but not really /s)
/r/MensRights25/05/23 09:43 AM
12

Using google translate for it? Yeah no, that 16 year old young man is fucked. And at least the article linked makes it sound like he's in for a world of hurt. Which probably remarks more toward just how little reproductive autonomy men (of any age) actually have. 16 year old bitch thinks she can care for and provide for a child? 16 year old father doesn't agree? Doesn't fucking matter, the courts side in favor of the mother. And that would, itself, expand toward how Men (of any age) are basicall…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 09:38 AM
3

missed the /s there, my dude
/r/MensRights25/05/23 09:15 AM
13

I mentioned just a few minutes ago about the 'origin of feminism' - look up the Declaration of Sentiments from 1848. It's basically the basis for what would later become Feminism; just that the actual wording/phrasing of it is obviously 1848-ish - the crux of it being that they were still, largely if not entirely, blaming Men for everything wrong; for every injustice, for every perceived inequality, as far back as 175 years ago. Some of it, I admit 175 years ago, may have been valid. But it was …
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:59 AM
3

First part, the history lesson. Feminism is very much so based on The Declaration of Sentiments. This was a summit/meeting back in 1848, which summarily involved a lot of women arguing that women had an unfair deal in society, by government, etc. - all around it was a document blaming everything wrong with women's situation, both in terms of rights and in society, on men. Bar no, or few, other sources of blame. That hasn't changed in the last roughly 175 years. (Tangent - and that makes it all t…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:53 AM
1

I think there's an inherently different approach to male bonding as related to female bonding - and a lot of the Feminists (or Feminism in general) only wants to encourage or promote bonding the way they do it. Which would mostly be pouring their hearts out complaining about whatever over a long island iced tea at some lunch get together - whereas men are more likely to talk things over a pint at the bar, go bowling, play whatever sport is convenient for them/their friends, work on the car in th…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 08:05 PM
1

Maybe this could explain why women are the majority in instigating divorces? You raise an interesting point, but I'd sooner think it's a mix of different things going on - you can't ignore how many women treat their marriage (and divorce) like a retirement plan to extort money from their ex; and to some degree, are even incentivized to divorce in order to claim material/financial benefit for their own personal gain, at the expense of their previously beloved.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 05:49 PM
2

A big part of it is how Feminism as an ideology thrives on and requires a victim class; an oppressor against the oppressed. When they say "you can't be sexist toward men!" - they are not operating on the same definition of sexism like rational people, and defining sexism as "discrimination based on gender." Instead they're dressing up the oppressor & oppressed basis of their ideology in a costume called sexism, and hoping people won't notice what they're doing.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 05:45 PM
22

Specifically? Paternity. There's an incredible barrier & empathy gap about paternity, because at least to me, it seems deeply seated in women's psyche that they can't relate with what it's like to "not know" whether you're the father. They have no real equal frame of reference for it - speaking in equivalent terms, they know with such extreme confidence that they are the mother (the baby did literally come out of their body), that they know with practically absolute certainty that they are the m…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 06:59 AM
1

Honestly I don't see much wrong with that person's comment. Probably more to the point; that their comment just seems like they've seen/heard the "what a real/true man is" discussion before, as almost all MRA's have, and seen how it doesn't actually "do anything". Talking about what a "real/true man" doesn't solve male suicide rates. It doesn't solve men almost exclusively being drafted into the military. It doesn't fix how men serve disproportionately longer sentences for the same crimes. It do…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 06:51 AM
4

Edit: y'all are awesome, I was looking for the stereotypical manosphere bs about what a 'real man' is to analyze them because I'm pretty sure those traits are just coping mechanisms for trauma, keep posting tho y'alls' answers are great And what "stereotypical manosphere bs" would that be?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:37 AM
1

Is it bad if a woman refuses to partake in a paternity test If we're being technical here, the mother doesn't need to be involved - as samples would need to be taken from the child and the would-be father. The mother is functionally only agreeing or not agreeing to her child having the test done; you don't need samples from her to prove who the father was. To which, disagreeing with having a paternity test done, is pretty damaging, as it forces the man to take her word as proof of paternity, rat…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 09:04 PM
33

Decent enough article, for the first 2/3. He can take his religion and screw himself with it for the last third, though.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:44 PM
5

In short words? I watched my mom destroy herself and her body for the sake of her career. Her other habits and addictions didn't help, but were made worse by the constant "deadline" of having a job that demanded/demands more of her than she has to give. I watched an older sister turn into a whore through high school and drop out of college to try an start a family with an auto mechanic. She had higher hopes and dreams, and it hasn't been until she's almost 45 to really find someone to settle dow…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 01:14 AM
2

You know what the crazy part is? She lists the only reason why married couples don't use contraception is because marriage affords routine and schedule. Like somehow, some way, once you get married, it's magically a super power given to women that they suddenly and miraculously know when they are ovulating and when they aren't. That just comes from marriage, right? Cue bad women's anatomy fanatics here - No Chelsea. That's not how that works. That's not how that works at all.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:37 AM
3

Look at their sidebar. We consider ourselves a pro-feminist community. That tells you pretty much all you need to know about them/the sub. They occasionally have some decent articles linked to. Occasionally. But that's more a matter of the article/linked content being occasionally worth a read, more than the sub/community itself being anything good. Most of their discussions turn into a double speak bonanza of trying to figure out what the hell they're actually trying to say and what they actual…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 06:23 PM
4

The irony is that they'll use similarly decades old studies & data to justify their own agenda, without seeing the obvious hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 02:16 AM
91

In the last week, there was someone posting a study/survey of how more people are more lenient toward the woman cheating, than the man. Including other men, who while still having a 'minority' of the numbers, shows that less men had issue with the woman cheating, than when the man cheats. I can only wish that people looked at it objectively/fairly/equally, but that pretty much isn't the case. All cheating should be reprehensibly 'bad', regardless of who/which gender does it. But that also, simil…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 12:26 PM
7

at least judging by the top comment of the stickied post in that sub about the strike? Yes. Mostly.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 08:36 PM
4

I recall someone a while ago having some survey data (from more than a decade ago) of what reasons women gave for why they were getting the abortion. With the overwhelming majority of them being that they simply didn't want the child. Yes, there were some "Can't afford a kid/another kid" responses, and genuine "Raped/incest" responses. But the majority were unwilling to become a mother. From this, I would be very interested to see/hear more updated/current survey data, with very explicit definit…
/r/MensRights12/04/23 04:52 PM
3

For one thing, document everything and make copies of it. You're a landlord, so you can probably call up a lawyer/attorney and start the eviction process. Literally. She threatened you with death and arson - those are reasonable enough to seek eviction to deal with a problematic tenant. You've already talked to the police about it, so they have some record of it somewhere - probably talked to her to at least calm her down for a while, but I do not think it would "solve" the problem (and there's …
/r/MensRights10/04/23 06:29 PM
1

So again do you hate feminism or do you hate todays idea of feminism? First, you say this like there is only hate to have toward either 'historic' feminism, or 'modern' feminism. It assumes I'm so heavily invested to feel so strongly about feminism. Indifference would be a better word for it. I don't hate it, that's too much work and I have better things to do with my time and attention. I just don't care about it. This doesn't mean ignorance - I've read enough articles (both for and against), I…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:49 AM
5

Men are objectified all the time - and almost as often for similar "sexual objectification" as women are. You'd probably never hear them admit it outside of their closest friend circles, but just look at how many women of the 90's and 00's that fawned over Brad Pitt and Keanu Reeves. Look at how many women have lust in their eyes when they see Ryan Reynolds or Leo DiCaprio. Chris Hemsworth or Gerard Butler. It doesn't just 'stop with' celebrities either; back a few years ago there was Hoda and K…
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:41 AM
2

This just makes it sound all the more true that women generally don't negotiate with their employers - though the context for that is usually toward the wages/salary, in this context it would be about the professional title added to his name. If those other Psych's want it added, what's stopping them from approaching the manager themselves? How is it your partner's job to do that for them? And of course we can flip it around - he's not a misogynist because he assumed his colleagues would be full…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 10:37 PM
11

Seems dubious - or would need definition of what is meant by "cover 72% of the income in cohabitation situations". It's no secret that women tend to make something like 70-80% of purchases for a household; but that's not income, that expenses. Or similarly that whoever you are arguing with is equating "domestic duties" like cooking/cleaning to what should be equal to income, when it's like honey, no one's paying you to wash your own dishes and vacuum your own carpets, so that's not exactly "inco…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 10:29 PM
2

I don't think it's as much to "impress" the other girls, as much as it is to "prove themselves better than the other girls". In other words, an inferiority complex. I also don't think men are "immune" to that, just that they're going to express it in different ways. We've all known that one coworker/friend who wouldn't shut up about how he has a bigger house, a newer car, etc. - just that most well adjusted guys are humble enough not to brag about it.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:33 PM
7

depends which definition you use. The "actual" definition? Involuntarily celibate? No, and your admitted history and 2 "genuine sex" times accounts for that. If you were actually involuntary celibate, you'd still be a virgin, or it'd only be the paid-for times you had sex. In the "modern feminist/slang" definition? None of what you said leads me to think you're an asshole, just maybe young and dumb and putting too much of your self-worth into having sex. That's not incel, that's just hormones an…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 01:15 AM
4

reminds me of George Carlin's skit on why politics - especially leaders and representatives - are so bad. They all come from the same education system - garbage in, garbage out. ChatGPT is only "as bad as" the data its AI is trained on. Garbage in, garbage out.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:51 PM
1

On specifically men's shelters, last time I looked (about 1 or 2 years ago, give or take some months), was when some news of a guy down in the bible belt of the US was trying to get one up and running. Not sure if he was successful, but he was trying. And that one, that singular and individual shelter for men was pretty much the only one exclusively available to and for men. The only other shelter for men exclusively was up in Canada, but that one got shut down or stopped running when the guy ru…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 10:23 PM
3

Part of the irony of "but they're a -ist!" bullshit, is people tend to LOVE HP Lovecraft and Cthulu and all the cosmic horror genre he started - with only some fraction of that audience being aware he was mid-1900's era and various -ism was much more common. But they still eat up the entire genre he created, as if it's no big deal. Stark contrast to the amount of rainbow alphabet folks losing their shit over a Harry Potter game, boycotting it, and denouncing anyone that buys/plays/streams/etc. i…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:52 AM
10

As a general thing? Replace any of their instances of "men" with "blacks" or "jews" or "asians", and it would no question appear that this person would be aggressively racist. Which brings to point that this person is aggressively sexist against men. Tearing it down point by point? Violent crime is committed by both genders; incidence rate is admittedly higher from men, but that doesn't mean women aren't capable. There have been several female serial killers and plenty of women involved, in some…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 08:06 PM
1

It's related to MRM with how it relates to female genital mutilation - which FGM does tend to cut off the entire clitoris among other "trimming" down there. The foreskin does some fair amount of things for the penis, and most of the "reasons" to cut it off end up being purely religious (ie: a 2000+ year old book told me if I don't I'm going to hell), or hygiene (some 1500-1700's kind of lack of hygiene and it would be some fair bit harder to keep boys/mens junk clean). In modern times? We have q…
/r/MensRights29/01/23 01:48 AM
2

I went to the ER some years ago for heart worries feeling like I was having an aneurysm. You wanna know what they did? They sat me in a bed for 3 hours and took my heart rate and blood pressure, and left me the fuck alone. They didn't do a damn thing to rule out aneurysm, or any other clotting issue, or any other kind of problem. Then they charged me $400 for a nurse to bring me half a tablet of baby aspirin, and $8000 for them to do nothing for 3 hours. This woman is bitching that they're tryin…
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:54 AM
1

The history of feminism & sexism around the world got distorted, when feminism realized they could twist history to fit their own narrative; it's some 1984 stuff "He who controls the past controls the future."
/r/MensRights14/01/23 02:27 PM
2

If she's straight - really, the joke's on her, because she's basically saying she wants to date or marry exclusively homeless, low/no-income men. Due to her own ironic standards, there won't be any 6-figures, 6-ft, 6-inches men left to find, mostly failing the 6-figures part. If she's any variation of not-straight - well that's a horrible thing to wish suffering, strife, inability to provide for oneself, and sleeping either in the wildnerness or in more risky/dangerous situations, and such a hor…
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 12:31 AM
5

The irony is that the internet, particularly social media side of internet, is much more left leaning than she assumes. There's so much that Feminism (and broadly, the Left) do that allows & encourages them to post this kind of drivel, that if it were any "actually Right-moderated", it'd look more and more like the 'environment' they have created, where there's a lot of banning, cancelling, etc. of dissenting voices. That's irony for ya. And hypocrisy. And the kicker is she (they?) are using ver…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 02:35 AM
1

Such is the way of Reddit - but most especially on the socially critical subreddits that would seem to "attack" their "ideology", there is and would always be, some amount of lurkers/activity from them arguing against the sub's own declarations as per sidebar. If nothing else; this sub (and limited few others), actually does tend to allow meaningful discussion, debate, questioning and so on. It doesn't default to censorship, banning, trolling, or otherwise moderating content solely on "but I dis…
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 02:27 AM
19

Wage gap on it's own merits is false - in the majority of western countries, it's illegal to pay anyone (regardless of gender) a different amount, based solely on their gender. If Wage Gap were true, businesses would OVERWHELMINGLY prefer to hire women, because paying women less per hour would lead to profits on the bottom line. Among all the other aspects that prove "wage" is not the right word to use here - Feminism got that blatantly wrong when they argued wage gap, and have mostly been quiet…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 02:10 AM
1

So wait, stop blaming others, then you go on to argue blaming simps and doing our part to stop them? I'm not against some parts of the idea, honestly, but your title and then the content of the post is suspiciously hypocritical.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 08:29 PM
8

Part of the irony about the patriarchy idea is that they argue it promotes men; but that can easily get taken apart by asking who gets drafted/conscripted to war, or why there's more male homeless, or why there's higher male suicide rate. Seems like the system they argue benefits men, doesn't actually benefit men. They're blind to all the legislation that elevates the average woman above the average man, and still somehow argue on emotion that they're somehow oppressed.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 08:14 PM
4

the entire ~45 minute thing was pretty grating, mostly on how much deflection was happening by the pro-feminists of the panel. "Oh there's criticism, lets deflect definition by woman-of-color! or woman-with-disability!" - and then devolving into the same bullshit we've heard time and again. Pearl asked for explicit examples of the barriers, chimed against the one saying "but pay gap!" - and it took someone else explaining it that women's work ethic (and 'life responsibilities') tend to be worlds…
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 06:27 AM
19

You only have to look at the MensLib sidebar rules to get the reason it is the way it is... ... We consider ourselves a pro-feminist community. And there it is. They're trying to fix men's issues, and often doing it in a way that doesn't allow examining the cause of the issue(s) in the first place. They move the goal posts of what the causes are, without actually acknowledging the damage feminism has caused from the jump; divorce rates, alimony, reproductive rights, disparity in victimhood of vi…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 08:12 PM
3

When it's strippers or models, I don't see reason to care. Like, part of the reason they got the job in the first place was because of their looks, attractiveness, etc.; part of the job is literally to be objectified. When it's sports, it's a different story because it's not about how attractive he is, it should be about how they're competing for the best score, fastest time, etc. - and that's where the apparent hypocrisy is, when there's women doing the commentating at men's olympic swimming, t…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 09:48 PM
10

There was a talk Jordan Peterson had a while ago with some radio person, not the "so what you're saying is" one, but a different one, where part of the argument he was suggesting was how differently the genders deal with confrontation. Peterson's argument was that, between men, there's the whole threat of violence/getting physical to resolve a conflict or argument. Some dude says enough bullshit to you, you're gonna punch him in the face/mouth. But between women, there isn't that same amount of …
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:32 PM
1

So much of education has become feminized that it's kind of ludicrous; a lot of men won't prefer to stay in a system that seeks to feminize them on that basis alone. But even the ones who will, are met with a lack of funding, through grants or scholarships, that afford them easy access to education - compared to the amount of similar funding available to throw almost any woman who applies for them access to college/university, simply because vagina. Okay, maybe also a 3.0+ GPA, but still, so man…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:03 AM
13

... ChatGPT is a chat bot; this isn't some person, it's an AI designed to be "conversational" in response, and this is what it spit back out.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:53 AM
2

Which way do you lean politically and why? Center; but with a lot of centrist things, it depends on what kind of issue you're specifically talking about. Like I'm happy Biden went and signed into federal protection marriage equality for same sex/interracial couples. But if it's economy, I'm pretty conservative; I think we should limit the deficit spending, go through all the earmarked policies, and cancel a fuck ton of programs that benefit all kinds of people, at least until we can work down th…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:58 PM
83

What takes the cake is a comment that says I defy anyone to try being female for a minute and see how far into that minute you get without feeling a boiling rage erupting at every discriminatory remark and action this world has to offer against females. Okay, sure, I'd love to actually be acknowledged, recognized, treated as valuable, etc. just for having a vagina. I'm not sure boiling rage would describe what I'd feel; it'd be entirely alien just to get a compliment more than twice a year - eve…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 04:13 AM
350

The irony of this article is that it's only arguing for the worst offenders of 'man-children', which honestly don't hold a candle to the worst offenders of immature women that can barely work a microwave, or don't work while their husband pulls 60+ hour weeks and comes home to a filthy house and dirty laundry yet to do, because entitled wifey decided to sit on her ass watching TV and browsing socmed all day. There's enough horror stories of 'woman-children' in relationships that this argument (a…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:20 AM
2

Machiavellianism? Machiavellianism is a personality trait that denotes cunningness, the ability to be manipulative, and a drive to use whatever means necessary to gain power. Narcissism? selfishness, involving a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy, and a need for admiration, as characterizing a personality type. Psychopathy? Psychopathy is a neuropsychiatric disorder marked by deficient emotional responses, lack of empathy, and poor behavioral controls, commonly resulting in persistent antis…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:47 AM
11

The whole thing with Tate, specifically with opting out, is that it's mildly known that "bachelorism" has been a thing. The notable example is Nikola Tesla, who never married. And of course not all men are going to meet his level of intelligence/genius, that's an impossible standard, but the point is that men choosing not to marry existed before MGTOW existed; before Tate became relevant, etc. As for the current, relatively 'popular' push for men not to marry/cohabitate? I think we won't see the…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 07:01 AM
8

I'm now 37 and she's 35 Full stop what She's 35 and still thinking that getting in bed with her older brother's friends will, somehow, find her soulmate? What the fuck is this, highschool? This isn't something you need to sit your friends down and tell them "hey, just, please don't sleep with my sister" - it's the kind of thing that you need to sit your sister down and lay down some laws - "If you do it again, consider our family bond null and void, you are dead to me, please, just stop sleeping…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 01:31 AM
1

Do you guys agree that men and manosphere related things are being abused? I mean, men, in terms of physical/domestic abuse? The "sacred" NCBI/NIH document that feminism occasionally likes to cite as their source also suggests women are roughly equal in terms of violence in relationships. They'll never admit it; instead leaning hard on individual statistics cited from the same document, despite other statistics pointing toward instances where men are victims of abuse as often, or, and this is th…
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/22 11:29 AM
4

I seriously wonder if he's saying this because... A: He's fucking old and has no, or very little, natural testosterone left in him. or B: Is just shilling out to pull in any kind of audience for his most recent shitty movie. In which case, even if A is true, at least dude still has some game when it comes to being a capitalist fuckwad.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/22 09:12 AM
4

In terms of society? We probably could simply do without social media overall. If only because of how "stupid" society has made people - "lets all look at our phones every 5-30 seconds!". In terms relative only to misandry/mysogyny? It'd help, probably (on both fronts), but you'd have to deal with root causes that social media only amplifies (particularly echo chambers; reddit is not immune here).
/r/MensRights06/12/22 07:50 AM
11

Depends on the industry. Construction vs Software Dev are going to have very different expectations & implications of what Affirmative Action does for them, in terms of gender-based hiring. Removing industry as a factor; and AA basically does what we're taught & told not to do as a matter of lawful, respectful, civility: discriminate. AA is afforded the ability to look at race, gender, age, etc. as factors to hire (or not hire) applicants. It's entirely back-asswards in terms of what AA should b…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:12 PM
0

I'll save people the click through: At about 2 minutes in, he finally says it - that women want the laundry list of criteria, from the men they're already attracted to. Which implies the attraction part comes first, and the laundry list of what they say they want, is what they wish those men they were attracted to first had. eg: Tyrone/Chad isn't dependable, but fuck is he hot. Beta Bucks Billy meets the criteria she wants Tyrone/Chad to have, but not the attraction. Then at about the 3:30 mark …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:22 AM
3

if forums were what you were looking for, try communities (dot) win (slash) c (slash) MGTOW (intentionally trying to avoid discrete links to it)
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:09 AM
1

I think you're kind of missing the point of Karen Straughan's post; you asked for feminism to be debunked, and the several key points she brings up illustrate how "not equal" that feminist leadership & organizations are. The Oxford definition is only so useful there - and most of the time definitions like that are more declarations; they aren't the thing people are trying to debunk or change the definition of. I had a cousin once who would use the word "bad" to mean "awesome". Like "That action …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:06 AM
3

I'd point to the Karen Straughan copy paste that gets posted now and then; to point out several feminist's relatively toward the top of the organization(s), and several groups & chapters that claim to be for women/feminism, on just how "not equal" they operate. The "No, they aren't true feminists, you, some random on the internet, is the real feminist!" post. That definition you used is functionally a No True Scotsman fallacy - and the Karen Straughan copy/paste basically highlights how absurd t…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:47 PM
3

The premise is very, very flawed - the no paid sick days thing would assume it's the employee that's sick, not their kids or family (as a technicality there, their argument shouldn't be about no paid sick days, it should be about access to FMLA time, not paid sick day time). Then the solipsism continues with basically arguing that then the mother/significant other would need to watch her own kids - which is a subjective argument down to the couple; if the railworker (presumably a man) brings in …
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:34 PM
1

back in the day: it was someone who, through sometimes violent methods, fought for legitimate rights that we all take for granted now - the right to vote, for one. Doesn't mean I like how they did it, but it was a generally "good" thing considering how critical voting is in the US. What it means now: Someone who will hold the same 'fervor' toward fighting & arguing for things; but delusionally believe their current issues are just as, if not more oppressive than those of their ancestors. Often e…
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/22 03:29 AM
4

Mostly because of Apex Fallacy; they see mostly men in the senate, house of reps, or holding office as president; as well as leading the wealthiest companies/businesses as CEO's, and reach the delusional conclusion that ALL men are that "powerful" (economically or politically). There's sometimes a pic floating around of the "pyramid" - the top 1% of men are at the top, then women, cats/dogs/pets, and at the bottom, average men. The morons pushing the "patriarchy narrative" ignore that the "tier"…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 02:08 AM
20

Immediate thought: It's Ms Magazine, with is overwhelmingly a feminist propaganda publication. I don't expect anything of value from this article - it'd be like expecting anything remotely true to be found out of a tabloid that reports on Bigfoot & UFO's. After reading the first paragraph: They're not going to mention a single damn thing about how men supposedly benefit from divorce, are they? They're just going to complain about it, or only have data points relating to women, and few/none relat…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:40 PM
5

The hypocrisy is that they say just that to men, a fair amount of the time, and probably because abstinence, condoms, and vasectomies are the only 'real' contraceptives available to men.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:19 AM
7

The hypocrisy of dating (in the US) is precisely around what you're saying about asking them questions, often that mirror what they asked you. There's an unbelievable amount of women who don't think it's unusual to ask height of a man, but then get offended when the man asks her weight. And you can 'share' similar themes of this arrogance/getting offended to almost any other topic. They feel "entitled" to know how much you make, but as soon as you ask how much they make, they shut down. This, ir…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:33 PM
8

between Musk and Twitter, then International Men's Day, it's not unexpected. Though anecdotally, I've generally seen how once it hits December 1st, a lot of those man-bashing posts go down in frequency when women remember it's their boyfriends/husbands/brothers/fathers who will be buying them gifts. Then Jan 1 comes around and it's floodgates on it again - though somewhat tempered - until Valentines day. But the rest of the year is much more "open season" on man-hating.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:46 AM
1

The point that religion is old is true, sure. I meant that more in the sense that I know more about Abrahamic religions than others. I would argue that the age of religion/faith doesn't have a lot of relevance; outside of a historical/academic context, what real value is there in knowing that some old Zoroastrianism concepts got absorbed into Christianity? Or as per this sub, a lot of the issues men, MRA's, and the MRM have been seeing have come up more the last 100-200 years, so the relevance o…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:29 PM
1

Depends on the religion, but I would say yes, with a caveat. The caveat being that religions - particularly Abrahamic religions - also include a ton of verses to control men. Perhaps not always to the same degree as they control women (that's arguable), but still control over both men and women; of people in general.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:36 PM
3

serial killers always men Except, y'know, Aileen Wuornos, Juana Barraza, Jane Toppan, Gesche Gottfried, Amelia Dyer, and others that fill out a top 10 list on the first result looking it up with a pretty basic search. don't believe in the statistics of domestic violence Feelings over facts, eh? Especially when the facts and various data suggest that in terms of physical abuse, men & women in relationships are roughly equal in terms of victimhood AND perpetrators of that physical abuse? I'd love …
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/22 09:44 AM
2

I would encourage you to look into a couple people and their dealings with Feminism; Warren Farrell and Erin Pizzey. Warren was a feminist back around the 60's-80's as I recall; he stood with them and did what he could to support them. But then by his own admission, he attempted to bring up men's issues. Perhaps under the pretense of "Feminism helps men too; it's an equality movement" - except he found no help for issues he brought up, and saw no equality toward addressing things he mentioned. F…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 08:56 AM
28

She's not far off on the "how often a woman is killed" number - https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-56365412 Though that article cites 177 women killed per year (which would arrive at a woman killed every 2 days), while also citing that 416 men are murdered per year (averaging to 1.1 men killed per day). Which just makes a lot of the rest of her argument fall pretty flat - I would agree all the murder and circumstances she describes of it are horrible and do need attention, but when you're basin…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:45 AM
3

It is generally true; can't speak for specifically Adidas, but just ads in general. If you wanted a more criticism-filled gander into "body positivity", go do an image search for it - you're probably going to find about 95% of images are of chubby, overweight, and obese women, and the spare 5% of images decided to include a man (of any build/weight category) - and the few of those that do lean toward male body positivity, they would still use images of relatively fit/healthy men rather than over…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:10 AM
2

well probably the first bit would involve moving International Toilet Day to a different day (preferably International Women's Day, to see how much they like having Toilets associated with them on the same day).
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:15 AM
4

The premise is faulty - Feminism has been against men since it started, and the degree to which is goes against men has only gotten more brazen, more hostile, and subjectively more hateful toward men as each 'wave' of feminism comes around. Probably the most damning bit: if Feminism were truly "for men" or "true equality", then why not rebrand as egalitarianism? Oh, right, because at best they only play lip service toward men's issues, and at worst, use hashtags like #KillAllMen to get their poi…
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 03:12 AM
60

Still not as bad as the whole 11% of journalists killed are women thing, but still pretty bad.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 11:58 AM
6

Reminds me of the rebuttal some random response had to this type of tweet - that he'd rush to the door and hold it forcibly closed, so when the woman finally (if ever) opened it, she knew her oppressor and overcame the patriarchy! Also - chivalry is dead, and feminism killed it. They can't apparently accept the generally kind gesture of opening the door for someone as general kindness, and immediately jump to "It means he thinks I can't open it myself, that pig!". No, Karen, if I thought you cou…
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 07:42 PM
6

Just flip the script; feminism says shit like "Not all men, but enough men do rape that it's an issue." Okay then - Not all women will falsely accuse, but enough women do it that it's an issue.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 05:40 PM
0

what pay gap? Men work longer hours, and work in more profitable jobs, generally speaking. Pro choice policies Should only be allowed when pregnancy is a result of rape, incest, or other sexual assault. These, however, only make up guesstimates around 5% of abortion reasons given. The other 95% would be the pregnancy is unplanned, they can't afford it, or simply don't want the baby. I'm of the opinion that there's enough education around contraception that arguments in favor of full pro-choice a…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 05:14 PM
6

anecdotal evidence I appreciate the candor with male friends in your life, but anecdote dodges the point of why I as asking for concrete, tangible ways "feminism helps men". A pointed example: https://nypost.com/2017/10/29/these-shelters-help-male-victims-of-domestic-violence/ literally: "DALLAS — A Texas group has opened what’s believed to be only the second shelter in the U.S. exclusively for men who are victims of domestic violence" - as of 2017, there were only believed to be TWO shelters fo…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 05:51 PM
2

Can you give concrete, tangible examples of ways Feminism has attempted to, acted on, and honored it's claim that "Feminism helps men too!" Because there's a pretty lengthy copy-pasta from Karen Straughan that would pretty concretely paint Feminism as being very much so anti-male, ranging from individuals within leadership positions of the movement, to branches of organizations claiming to be pro-feminist actively campaigning against men's issues. Have you seen Cassie Jaye's documentary "The Red…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 08:15 AM
44

The sub itself claims it is a pro-feminist sub in it's sidebar, if that tells you the kind of bullshit that will be tolerated by it's mods/users. There's an ongoing thread right now about an article from The Guardian and "The State of Boys", where a decent chunk of response are literally being removed because god forbid men don't agree with what feminism has to say. They want their echo chamber, with no one to challenge or discuss things critical of an ideology a lot of MRA's see as flawed? Fine…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:52 PM
3

While I agree paper abortion should be an option, I don't think it's going to really gain a lot of traction in terms of legislation/court precedent. And not even from a standpoint of equality - that's where I agree it should be an option. Rather instead the aspect of how it'd allow single moms already are more likely to sign up for and receive welfare benefits - a paper abortion would likely see an increase in the welfare paycheck written out to single moms where the father did a paper abortion.…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 08:08 PM
21

Nevermind the subversion here; anything that can be done to put the spotlight back on them, even when it's supposedly a month for awareness of men's health.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:55 PM
1

Lauren's solipsism is kind of astounding. To the point that I genuinely question her ability to remove her ego entirely and actually put herself in men's shoes, actually acknowledge data (on divorces, particularly), on biology (men can wait much, much longer than women can to start a family), on all sorts of topics. She definitely sounds like a woman sincerely asking "Where have all the good men gone!?" - unable to accept or realize that feminism & policies pushed for by it have made dating, rel…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 03:14 AM
6

The fun thing is I've had my sister's "mansplain" to me, but usually in response to me genuinely curious and interested in whatever the topic is. One sister was working for a foreign company that built train cars; I was genuinely interested how that whole process works and her role in it. I would tend to agree with your friend that it's more likely to be men doing the "mansplaining", or do it "unprovoked", but that women are perfectly capable of "mansplaining", even if unlikely to. Ultimately it…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 05:05 PM
9

i like how two out of the three subs you linked to are apparently banned, one for almost a year, and both due to lack of moderation.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 06:49 PM
9

lets not also forget that while the legal definition is a thing, in public discourse they have changed the definition of rape to be any behavior they find unacceptable - look for 2 milliseconds too long? Rape. Deny her advances? Rape. You're both blackout drunk? Rape. She takes consent back 1 week-20 years later? Rape. It'd be nice if her legal definition was one that feminism actually stuck to, instead of moving the goalposts to tend to their agenda.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 06:44 PM
3

no, it's a different platform; communities (dot) win is a different platform entirely from reddit. Not to mention the old mgtow sub on reddit got banned a while ago.
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 10:01 PM
3

just sounds like those women don't realize the whole 80/20 split that's been found and seen in the data from Tinder; they don't acknowledge that the majority of women are only picking from the same 20% pool of men, and don't even see the other 80%. It isn't "shallow" to not have expectations, but that's not even the "problem" for men on dating apps - it's that even when they do swipe right on every profile, the average man is going to be lucky to get any matches out of any of the women he swiped…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:38 PM
27

swipe right = you like them and would want to get to know them better. swipe left = you reject them and wouldn't choose to engage further with them.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:15 PM
5

Possible? Sure. Likely? Not really.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:25 AM
5

If ever an article could be considered a chameleon, this one is it. While also having all the 'lets discuss this, but not do a fucking thing about it' buzzwords and talking points, it only leads to question how sincere the author is. It has just enough of the acknowledgement that men's issues are real, as if to convince the feminist men "see we do care, we know stuff is difficult", but keeps any call to action about it at bay just far enough that it simply comes off as "gotta keep the few on our…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 06:16 AM
1

The really ironic thing is, sometimes men, especially young men, will virgin shame each other. Of course it's not fun, and using feminism's own terminology, it would be "toxic masculinity", and on the one hand they'll condemn it just by being connected to "toxic masculinity". But on the other hand, they'll resort tot he same virgin shaming through the incel insult. It's just a shame we don't call that out as toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 03:26 PM
8

for what it's worth, someone got the full unedited conference/lecture/debate (whatever you wish to call it) in that thread; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCrQ3EU8_PM To save you a click and hunt it down. The clip of the ActualPublicFreakouts starts at about 19 minute mark. edit: from skimming through bits of it, that event had fairly publicized protest & scheduled a walk out. The skinny dude was the guy Google fired over "controversial" memos a few years back. Lady saying "men and women are di…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:28 PM
15

This has so much hypocrisy to it that it's laughable. Short of a vasectomy - and not every guy is convinced they are safely reversible or willing to get snipped - men's only option is a condom. You know how many stories have come out of women literally poking holes in condoms, or otherwise stealing the condom? Remember when Drake put hot sauce in the condom afterward? With an alarming amount of women saying they'd resort to sabotaging the condom or otherwise stealing the sperm after sex - Wendy …
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:47 PM
3

Do I think it's gonna have it's own difficulties, least of all because it's a hollywood relationship? Absolutely. Is age a part of that? Probably. They're still both adults, so who is really giving a shit? I stopped caring about which celebrity is dating who a long time ago.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:30 PM
5

Tell me you haven't met your hiring quota, without telling me you haven't met your hiring quota.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 07:16 AM
6

There was some post recently, not sure if it's jsut buried back a page or three, mentioning, I think it was Arkansas, outlining custody for out-of-wedlock mothers, and pretty much defaulting to what I'd assume would be "worse than marriage options" for fathers, in terms of actually having access to their own kids. Only trying to point out that - if your primary goal is custody of the kids, marriage is probably the better option - if your state doesn't already operate by the "out of wedlock" cust…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 10:39 AM
4

Probably the biggest annoyance here is that politicians - not just Yang - have this idea of unlimited spending budget. How do you think we got into such an inflation bubble if it weren't for billions being spent for the past decade and a half, and digging a deeper trench in national deficit? Yang's belief in UBI and other socialist spending does not encourage me to believe he'd be a great candidate in any capacity; not on the front of men's rights, but on economic policy. Rather it encourages me…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 12:01 AM
6

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=man+abused+in+public the specific one I saw was : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hWuLxo3wGI that one; but the YT search link brings back tons (you'll need to filter through some of the garbage ones like dr phil bullshit).
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:24 PM
53

Probably the 'best' thing to do is find the data that DOES say men can be victims of abuse in relationships; along with how it's roughly the same rate/chances for women to beat their partners as it is for men to - she'll probably deny it for some frivolous reason. Show her the 'social experiment' video of a guy clearly being abusive to a girl, and then the girl being abusive to the guy. There's a couple of them out there; where the typical response is people go to the woman's aid when she's the …
/r/MensRights17/10/22 08:56 AM
15

There don't need to be theories, necessarily. For straight couples - women are practically incentivized to divorce their husbands; through alimony, child support, custody defaulting in their favor to practically default child support in their favor. There's a few other factors to it, but those are the big ones. For lesbian & gay couples - there's only the past couple decades worth of same-sex marriages being legal to draw data from; there's enough variance in data collected that, outside of gene…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 09:16 AM
42

The most frustrating thing with trying to explain it to women, is that they have no innate concept of the idea. They almost always know that if they are pregnant, outside of surrogacy for an IVF couple paying them tens/hundeds of thousands, that the fetus is at minimum their genetic child. They have literally no concept of how vulnerable men are in terms of reproductive authority/autonomy after fertilizing the egg - they have no inherent concept that "the kid might not be mine, and paternity tes…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:27 AM
3

On #1 - I agree but only because of the sheer amount of free porn available elsewhere. From that, I'd expect the men actually signing up for subscriber-style content have some delusion that it's "more personal and tailored to me" kind of content, oblivious to her other subscribers existence. All it does is make you part of her circle of orbiters. On #2 - If first date and deciding who pays turns into a big argument, or anything, it's just a sign that she's using you for your money. This extends …
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:00 AM
1

The slight difference in the graph is basically irrelevant, and looks to be like arguing over how 'different' 48% and 49% are. They're close enough to be functionally equivalent, statistically speaking, and still the amount of men being thrown in front of the trolley as a total, is more than the amount of women being thrown in front of the trolley - it still fits with the brief's description. What I find interesting out of it is the data & points made from the 2nd experiment; the "we'll give you…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 11:40 AM
1

Herein lies the hypothetical argument. Regardless of gender, drunk driving is met with extremely harsh penalties. Why, then, is gendered consent while drunk only considering that women are the only ones incapable of consent while drunk? To the Law: Remain consistent. Either everyone sucks driving drunk, or no one sucks driving drunk. It's clear how Law has chosen to argue that regarding operating heavy machinery. I'd only ask consistency in regards to consent (or lack thereof) accusations.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 04:22 AM
2

At the very minimum here - at least OP only called up misogyny & male chauvanism. At least they're laying off the patriarchy and toxic masculinity. ... not that it gets them anywhere, but hey, baby steps, even if those baby steps are measured in atomic scale lengths here.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 04:17 AM
15

Lets just casually ignore that most romcoms paint men (even the desired one/target of the romance), as idiotic, stupid, and only valuable because for whatever reason get the lady to feel the tingles and/or gets them wet. Men don't hate romcoms because they don't respect women. Men hate romcoms because the typical romcom doesn't respect men.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/22 03:33 AM
5

They are college girls, near as I can tell, and don't particularly realize the "depth" to which their restrictions, even when it's just income, actually hurts their own chances of finding a life-long husband. There's enough other data & references to pull up that have already done the math; not necessarily only considering income, but the whole "6 figures, 6 foot, 6 inches" thing. With most of them trimming down the "total number of men that fit that criteria" down to a few hundred thousand in m…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:30 AM
7

The easiest answer: They think it'll get them laid. In short, don't underestimate the amount of rationalization a man can or will do to achieve an active sex life. The medium answer: Indoctrination. Whether through education system or political affiliation, they are told from a young age to believe in a thing, and are never encouraged to find their own answers. The hard answer: Willful ignorance. An extension of indoctrination; they're told men have always been the problem, and are so privileged…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:59 AM
2

It's an anecdotal story from an Arabian woman working abroad in Morocco, that happened 27 years ago. Not my monkeys, not my circus. Sounds like she should take the appeals and the case to Moroccan authorities; not chime in agreement to a globalized #MeToo and #BelieveAllWomen movement, when it just happens to be convenient to also receive a lot of validation & attention.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 03:20 AM
3

It's a no-win situation. He'd be accused of neglect if he didn't go in with her, he'd be accused of neglect if he left the kids alone while he went to the bathroom alone himself. He's already accused of being "disgusting" for using the urinal. His only real option to not get this response from the supervisor is to just hold it; but that's inhumane - not that the dogma that pushed for how family courts operate, cares at all how humanely it treats men & fathers.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 02:17 AM
3

Hey look, another way for them to gain debt, and likely get their orbiters to pay it off for them.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 01:50 AM
-2

sarcasm; no; though I was perhaps hoping enough of the 'implied obligation" part, and "investigation" in quotation marks, would have said enough of what I think of some branches of law enforcement. From your statement, am I to believe you're one of the ACAB types? Or one who deeply regards law enforcement as incompetent because any DV call immediately assumes the male is the aggressor?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:59 AM
2

What piques my interest more about the thesis comes down to the section where it describes gun violent crimes committed. The same crimes that, if we were to try and discuss them in almost any subreddit, would get shadowbanned and/or automodded when mentioning names or details of the crimes. What I mean is, because of the 6 or 7 crimes the thesis described, it's enough of a case history to draw up profiles - to assess users/members of MRM, and determine who may be most at risk of repeating the sa…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 12:45 AM
1

it's a blessing and a curse. The curse side is obvious; men are required to sign up for the draft, women aren't. It's an insane inequality. The blessing part; if I get wounded in combat and bleeding out, and my survival depends on some woman that had a fraction of the pullups, pushups, and other physical requirements, then I'm already dead. Chances are less in my favor that she'll be able to pick me up and move me; or even if she can, that she'd be able to get as safely far away as a man. Same s…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:31 PM
1

Varies, at least in what kind of terms you're willing to accept, or define as going your own way. The common concept is to not marry, not cohabitate. In the strictest sense of that concept, it doesn't necessarily exclude a GF - it almost certainly excludes a wife, though, either in traditional & ceremonial sense, or more modern & common law sense.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 01:04 PM
1

Only reason; no. Significant reason; very high likelihood. There's relatively "unknown" women that stream without a cam, absolutely, but for both men & women streamers, including a cam increases viewership & interaction; it's almost always a net-positive to include the cam. There's not many streamers (male or female) that can really "get away with" not using a cam, without already establishing themselves with an established audience. Along with the awkward idea some male streamers have that "the…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 12:52 PM
2

Most of Reddit is fairly well known for being echo chambers; this sub included; with perhaps the only real difference being that most men's group subs tend to be open to criticism, discussion, and debate - in contrast to the amount of mod censorship most feminist subs will involve. If the mods do allow your post, they've likely gone over it with a fine toothed comb to make sure it's not misogynistic; and the trouble it runs into is that any amount of criticism about feminism (or otherwise unfavo…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:42 PM
1

The US has some huge barriers (most of them set up by feminism and taken as precedent by the courts) to actually make it happen - and you can almost guarantee that the idea would be fought against severely by feminism. The courts already play to the feminist's tune - custody, child support, alimony, etc. - that a lot has to change before paper abortions would enter the realm of possibility here. Particularly as the courts and judges would look at it from the economic/political side of things. If…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:05 PM
1

I'm reminded of one of Karen Straughan's quotes from The Red Pill, which goes something like so (my bad paraphrasing aside)... "Feminism is named after the fight for all that is good and right. And it's fighting Patriarchy - implying men - is the root of all that is evil and wrong. They don't hate men - they just named everything bad after them." Let that sink in a moment. The following is borrowed from another Karen Straughan quote, copy pasting it from I forget where The following is a very in…
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 09:25 AM
1

1) where did feminism go wrong? Feminism - as I understand it - shouldn’t be about man bashing. Quite the opposite! It ought to be concerned with gender equity for everyone, but instead it’s lead to combativeness. Feminism went 'wrong' when it started listening to it's most vocal, most radical members, encouraging dominance-equality (if that's a term) more than egalitarian-equality or "true" equality. What I mean by dominance equality is that any benefit women get from feminism needs to come at …
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:05 AM
2

I agree that it's popping up more often in news & media - but until it gets action in the courts to include "forced to penetrate" in their definition of rape, that it will always be taken as a "lesser offense" compared to currently used definitions of rape. But with as much as both men deciding the courts, and women fighting for those "rape by definition excludes male victimhood" types, it won't get the attention it deserves.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 10:22 PM
1

Without proof, you're at the mercy of the parents and judicial system. Anecdotally, one of my highschool friends knocked up a 16 year old when he was 18 & graduated out of school. The judicial system wanted to throw the book at him - and he had to pay a few fines - but the single mom of the 16 year old trusted my friend would do everything in his power to raise and support the kid & her daughter; she didn't press any significant charges. He was lucky to avoid getting statutory rape & being a reg…
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:01 AM
2

I've heard someone say that the original "wage gap" concept was pretty quietly abandoned, and that the "new" concept for "wage gap" is closer (but not exactly) the "earnings gap". But a lot of that to do with how easily the original idea had all of it's flaws pointed out, whether that's "you're comparing a janitor to a brain surgeon", or "you're comparing someone working 40-45 hours a week to people who work 35-40 hours a week, on average for each", or "If businesses could actually, legally, pay…
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 12:45 AM
5

boys are degenerates beyond any help. If you put in any other pronoun in place of boys, you'd be labeled as a misogynist (girls), racist (blacks), or any other -ist pertaining to the used pronoun. getting their ass raped by grown men (they deserve that) Oh wonderful, if it's young boys then this account is apparently encouraging/projecting pedophilia. Perhaps more over "deserve that", how, exactly? No one deserves rape. Full stop. Whoever the victim is, is not a factor here. also start to advoca…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:52 PM
1

It's easy enough to understand why the roe vs wade thing changed that sub; since religion & pro-life arguments tend to go hand-in-hand, and that sub is literally atheism. I agree it's kind of annoying how much of it ends up about roe vs wade and "bible thumpers want you to have your rapist's baby" chanting, which is thankfully why there's other subreddits to discuss & debate religion/atheism that aren't that one; that may have less activity, but do involve a lot more posts discussing faith or la…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:23 PM
10

I understand it for rape - unwanted sexual assault that resulted in a pregnancy they were neither prepared or planning for. I understand it for medical reasons - maybe the mother has some fairly extreme health situation and she can't take the fetus(es) to term. I understand it for incest reasons - the genes of the offspring will literally be stunted and less-viable, either in the short term or long term. ... But I don't understand it because "I'm a smart, educated, beautiful woman with nearly im…
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/22 10:38 AM
2

Do keep in mind that if you're only looking for articles within the past month, it's kind of a given that a majority of them are going to be from feminist articles and shit. It's been a general trend for the past several years - it's nothing new - which means if you're only looking at the top page of search bar results, or only the first page of google searches, you're probably not finding a lot of the articles that actually bring it up as a men's right's issue. Which just means; make sure you'r…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:36 AM
85

They're taught double-standards from a young, tender age. "I can hit you, but you can't hit me" - and that then grows into "I can touch you, but you can't touch me" rhetoric. Too many girls don't understand that what they are doing is sexual assault; and too many guys are apologetic toward it wishing it was them.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:18 AM
0

The search bar exists; google exists. There's been a general/recent trend that more women enroll in and graduate colleges/universities than men. Not sure how much that answers the "supported in academia" question, but it is the end result that suggests the answer; more women enroll & graduate, therefore it's more likely they are supported through the academic process than men are - either more supported via encouragement to go to it, or more supported directly through the financial aspect of pay…
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:15 AM
20

Hypocritical that the article includes a "top 10" list of environmental impacting foods, and half of them are primarily plants/vegan - Nuts, Coffee, Tea, Jams, and Chocolate, are all plant-based, but they just conveniently ignore that to fit whatever shitty agenda they're on about.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 08:42 PM
1

Vast majority of the time - no. As for why, I suspect it's how deeply entrenched the feminist indoctrination is, particularly in western cultures.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 12:09 PM
1

I wish you well, if it were me I'd do a fair amount of preparation & research into preparing general debate tactics - particularly with a lean toward logical fallacies and how to identify them, whether it's ad hominem, strawman, etc.; so you can avoid falling for traps or conceding. I would also expect some degree of push & pull on condition that it's a fair debate; meaning, you may need to agree to a factoid they present that you either don't believe or don't agree with, just for the sake of ar…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:04 AM
11

Why is there no pushback or outcry for the disgusting bias? Because a not insignificant amount of people (men included) who would high five the teen boy for sleeping with the hot english teacher. And a similarly not insignificant amount of people (men included) who simply won't see it as abuse; "clearly the boy liked it" or "he got sex, what's the problem?" Like they don't stop for a second and remove gender entirely from the consideration - A teacher sleeps with a student. There is almost alway…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 10:13 PM
17

engineers aren't paid the same as secretaries even for the same hours. In this line of logic, you'd expect the highschool kid flipping burgers should get paid as much as the fire fighters saving people from burning buildings. You really shouldn't compare different occupations trying to argue "but they don't get paid as much" - because the logical comparison would be "how much difference is there between male & female engineers, and male & female secretaries" -- not mixing it up with "how much di…
/r/MensRights09/09/22 06:30 AM
2

vagina jokes, whatever, at least they are trying to express some form of humility. But when it's "haha dude took a shot to the nuts!" - it's like, Okay, flip it around, how funny is it when a woman gets knocked in the cunt? Ain't no one laughing at that, anywhere near as much, as when a dude takes a baseball to the crotch.
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/22 07:07 AM
3

When they portray it as harmless/humble, probably the best thing is do as Wingflier suggests - give them some data points. If they aren't willing to check the articles themselves to see the apparent hypocrisy & harmful rhetoric with a few examples, you may need to paraphrase it & cherry pick individual talking points. But this will require just as much effort on your own part - and likely be frustrating even when they do accept the data & articles, because they'll still more than likely deny it …
/r/AntiFeminists27/08/22 02:19 AM
2

@1st one - Kind of obvious what it's saying/suggesting; it's suggesting that feminism with a specific lean toward gender studies/educational systems, do have institutional & political power, despite how much they try to deny it. @2nd one - See above about denial; it attempts to deny women have any power, and basically tells them what patriarchy (that they're "fighting against") has been telling them - that they have no political, economic, or institutional power. The awkward thing is, there are …
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/22 06:01 AM
1

that subreddit has been trigger-happy about banning anyone participating in "off limits" subs for a very, very, very, very long time - it's not really surprising they're keeping at it. Congrats on the badge of honor though.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:55 PM
6

Femisnism is egalitarianism, except it addresses issues with womens struggles. Men have different kinds of struggles. ... you do realize, egalitarianism operates on expectation of equality & equity, regardless of gender, right? As soon as you start appending that with terms, conditions, and exceptions, that's not equality & equity. That isn't to say egalitarianism can't "do more" for women, but that it by it's very nature needs to also "do as much" for men. As soon as you trim off the "for men" …
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:48 PM
0

I think there's enough education about sex and reproduction, and enough availability of contraceptives, that anyone choosing to have children very definitively makes the choice to potentially have a child - abortion shouldn't be a solution to "get out of jail free" here. I'm fine with it when it's a case where the mother's life is at risk, the fetus/child's life is at risk, or when the pregnancy is a result of rape/assault/nonconsensual sex. I'm not fine with it when it's just a matter of "conve…
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 08:44 PM
18

Kind of amusing how they just completely forget that it takes 2 consenting adults to agree to sex before a baby happens - and there's a multitude of birth control options (more for women than for men) to prevent pregnancy with very high success at preventing it. IMO - it's less "You must have that baby!" and more "Maybe grow up and be a responsible adult; if you still want to sleep around, they aren't going around banning morning-after pills and IUD's and hysterectomies or vasectomies - you don'…
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 11:15 PM
1

Journalism has been a dumpster fire, for a while now, mostly because of the internet. You don't need to work too hard to start your own blog and call yourself a reporter. Just the same as Buzzfeed and other shitty journalist-lite chunks of the internet will sometimes do these same kind of reddit polls & response fishing.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 12:29 AM
2

because viewers and ad revenue, likely in large part because tits, and the infrequent and 2-3 day ban if/when she flashes her vag.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 06:50 AM
1

They appear to be unbanned now - at least given that several posts there are within the last few hours. Word is there were close to around 40 different 'guilds' banned, but only incels & mgtow got unbanned. There's enough other reasons why & discussions about it over there that it's easier if you just go there and read about all of how it broke down and the reasons for why the ban wave happened/why only 2 guilds got unbanned.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 09:02 PM
2

Your title is misleading, she was halfway to the wall - do people even read the articles they link to here? The 24-year-old driver of the car, identified by police as Jennifer Carvajal, is now facing DUI and reckless driving charges following the crash Sunday morning in Seffner, near Tampa. Three passengers were in the car with her, one of whom died.
/r/MGTOW07/05/21 09:46 PM
2

because they've got it in their heads that if anyone, anyone at all, disagrees with whatever ideology they spew, that they must be hateful. Mind you, they are mostly women who will likely end up as crazy cat ladies; or the cucks too busy scrapping for a crumb of pussy to care what happens to their fellow man.
/r/MGTOW18/04/21 06:33 PM
2

tldw; A feminist talks to a few guys from MRA groups, and discovers that men indeed do have some issues, some really concerning and serious, that society basically ignores. You won't learn anything 'new' by watching the movie. Cassie Jaye still makes it all about her, and her journey, through talking with Paul Elam and a few others, and basically retelling her diary entries of how her perspectives have shifted. She's still a typical, conceited, self-absorbed female in that aspect. She's a chamel…
/r/MGTOW09/03/21 07:01 PM
5

I think here the major difference is that those cheerleaders & pre-college football stars are "mature" enough to realize sexual exploitation for what it is, regardless of whether they'd agree that's what they're signing up for. The children of Cuties, however, do not, and are completely at the whims of their disgusting parents who are submitting to that kind of pressure - that kind of exploitation - just to line their own pockets. I wouldn't expect them to be intelligent enough to set up any kin…
/r/MGTOW14/10/20 06:22 AM
3

Just sayin; they probably didn't read anything about your comment, and simply saw the "P->Q" block, and banned you for using the same logic that's been used dozens/hundreds of time there (that they didn't like/assume it is trolling). Nothing of value was lost, though, it was only r/feminism.
/r/MGTOW28/09/20 04:29 PM
3

Sounds like you should talk to a school counsellor, some of your family members, or other good friends for some advice on where to go forward from where you're at. But chances are, they would probably lean toward the biomedical engineering degree just because it sounds like it would be more profitable in the long run. Ultimately, it would matter more what jobs or careers either degree opens up for you. It's like that for any/every major & degree out there. Someone could get a degree in psycholog…
/r/MGTOW27/09/20 12:36 AM
1

the kind of funny thing is, that comment/thread is like a month old, and people can still see the comment from your post history rather than in that thread. I also don't know how citing religious writings about the societal problems free women can bring about is really promoting hate - sounds more like whatever lurker reported you got her panties in a bunch because it hit too close to home frankly.
/r/MGTOW18/08/20 01:38 PM
10

It'd be like trying to talk about cancer, without mentioning cancer, tumors, or chemotherapy.
/r/MGTOW26/03/20 06:34 AM
6

The prisoners have almost absolute confirmation that they haven't traveled, have only had very limited (if any) contact with the outside world, and in general, don't have much of a need to worry about COVID19 because of those other factors being so severely limited. I can't think of a lot of valid reasons why we should release prisoners right now, actually, they're in a much more "safe from exposure" environment than everyone else outside.
/r/MGTOW25/03/20 08:29 PM
16

aside from the 'you answered your own question' responses; the quarantine coincided with the news about the navy seal going nuts in the past couple weeks and it was announced his #1 visited site in his search history was here. As far as reddit & various feminist outlets are concerned, we're guilty by association. At least, that's my take on it; seems like too big of a coincidence for it to be anything else to cause just MGTOW to get quarantined out of the blue, as opposed to any news of the othe…
/r/MGTOW14/02/20 03:20 PM
5

quarantined because some oversensitive snowflake complained. Suspicion around a news story that broke where some coast guard guy (search Christopher Hasson) did some shit, and the rest of the sub is guilty by association.
/r/MGTOW02/02/20 11:45 PM
5

generic answer; because the over-sensitive snowflakes complained enough to get reddit to do it. Again. suspicious answer: because some other news story broke of some dude did some shit and his most visited website was here; basically they think the rest of the sub is guilty/criminal by association. Again. I say Again to both because it's not the first time MGTOW has been quarantined/under scrutiny over the years. And it's not the first time it's been treated like this due to other similar subs g…
/r/MGTOW02/02/20 10:09 PM
2

Compare the topic to cancer - you can't accurately describe cancer without the word cancer, or tumor, or cyst, or benign, or malignant, or chemotherapy, or remission. About the closest you can get using a 5 year old's vocabulary is "you're sick and we're going to try some drugs to help you", but that doesn't hit on how serious cancer is, the risk it implies that it could come back, etc etc etc. So it is with critical posts about women - not just here, but in most reddit subs. You can't begin a p…
/r/MGTOW01/02/20 05:25 AM
4

30 year old woman The wall is hitting earlier and earlier, eh? pick one guy over another... Is that admission that you're already hypergamous? You already are "having to choose" between multiple men - so you never really were giving a single one of them your full effort toward a relationship. And then, after months/years of being in a relationship, I expect to hear about how "it's not my fault I cheated, it's his fault!" before you try to get back on the carousel.
/r/MGTOW05/12/19 02:10 AM
3

Dahmer was Wisconsin, not Ohio.
/r/MGTOW21/11/19 05:15 PM
2

Thing is, she wasn't asking you to actually explain why dressing up like a slut will get her attention. She was either looking for a shoulder to cry on; some sympathy. Or she was trying to manipulate you into defending her from "ugly guys" giving her attention that she's literally asking for by dressing so provocatively. These women are pretty inept at realizing that when they put their body on display, the rest of the world is going to see it - not just the Chads and Tyrones, but the Billy Bob'…
/r/MGTOW19/11/19 06:58 PM
2

No - even if she isn't lying, which she probably is, no contraceptive is 100% reliable.
/r/MGTOW16/11/19 06:14 PM
2

Do you all remember the posts of a Dad criticizing a judge because his (ex) wife wanted to gender swap their son? The wife was basing that how a 3 year old seemed to express interest in a toy for girls... from McDonalds. And she kept up with that charade for 4 fucking years until the relatively recent times of the articles about this whole shit show. Apparently, McDonald's is selling more than just diabetes; they're selling genders to naive cunts too!
/r/MGTOW07/11/19 03:44 AM
4

Worth pulling out of the article; She began telling him he’s a girl when he was just three, and testified in court that she began to believe that when he liked a McDonald’s toy meant for girls. So for 4 years, the mom has thought her son must be a boy because of a fucking McDonald's toy - and because of a McDonald's toy, is willing to put her child through glorified abuse? Honk fucking honk, boys.
/r/MGTOW25/10/19 02:08 AM
12

Definitely paints the picture of just how "significant" her SO is to her.
/r/MGTOW28/09/19 10:49 PM
1

a GF? Maybe, though you'd probably end up spending a lot of your return on investment on her. Wife/Kids? Unlikely, as she'd probably go after the investments in a divorce, be awarded at least half of their equity, and force you to sell early. Whatever is left would probably go toward paying legal fees, future alimony payments, and child support.
/r/MGTOW28/09/19 09:42 PM
1

My belief is that sex doesn't hurt anybody True in the sense of "in the act", when you're flooded with "feel good" hormones to reinforce sexual activity. False in the sense that there's virtually always a risk for transmitting STD's, a risk that increases as you rack up a body count or have multiple concurrent partners. False in the sense that one partner could get emotionally hurt upon discovery that the other has been sleeping around - usually in regard to expecting an exclusive relationship a…
/r/MGTOW26/09/19 11:00 PM
1

She's a child. An actual child, not the usual AWALT child that gets talked about on this sub. Which leads me to believe she has a very limited understanding of the world - strictly to that which her parents, and her (swedish) school system have basically indoctrinated her. I don't doubt that climate change is happening; just on a statistical level, water vapor contributes more than half of total greenhouse gasses - it beats out carbon, sulfur hexaflouride, ozone, and methane, combined. Yet we do…
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 02:30 AM
1

Can reverse this argument very easily; For feminism being all about female empowerment, they sure do whine about men a lot. Maybe instead of finding all new ways to apply "toxic masculinity" to anyone with a penis, they should focus more on actually being better human being themselves, eh?
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 07:08 PM
1

it's like talking about how you treat cancer - you can't do it without discussing tumors. Similarly, can't talk about going our own way without discussing what inspired that in the first place.
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 10:13 PM
2

My take on it: it just sounds like regurgitated Freudian psychology, given a 1965 author's treatment, toward an audience it no longer applies to. @1 - As restrictive as the roles might be, men are generally capable of seeing the social utility - whether it benefits themselves or society - of the roles they live by. As in, a fireman probably understand the potential risks & sacrifices and still agrees to run into a burning building to save people. As in, a soldier probably has a much more viscera…
/r/MGTOW18/07/19 05:40 AM
1

Depends on too many variables; how the money got there, how it gets distributed, who it gets distributed to (among another dozen of things to think about). And then there's also some amount of the whims of the judicial side of things, and if they just feel like the woman deserves more. A trust would offer slightly more security and legal tape to cut through, but it isn't, and won't ever be, a 100% "divorce rape secure" thing. Financially safer to just avoid getting married (whether common law or…
/r/MGTOW28/06/19 01:25 AM
4

That's the subtle tell of "You gotta work for this pussy" when they've got the slightest bit of being attractive without layers of makeup. The ugly ones? That's their version of "work" done to attract, as no amount of makeup will garner any interest.
/r/MGTOW04/06/19 12:19 PM
3

typical thot, and typically hypocritical. she's a single mom by her description, but holds a double standard for single fathers (no kids), and only wants men who haven't been married, so they haven't gone through hell (yet). She says no smokers, but thinks cigars are classy (it's all tobacco, hon). She claims to have run in 3 marathons which seems doubtful (or otherwise so far in the past that it's irrelevant). And she wants someone to be a hiking buddy, which seems at least mildly like extra po…
/r/MGTOW03/06/19 11:15 PM
8

As an aside, the author - Dean Takahashi - is the same poor excuse of a gamer that spent some 26 minutes on the struggle bus when Cuphead came out. We're talking like, couldn't figure out air dashes in a tutorial text permanently plastered on the fucking wall of the level, and he spent a good 4-5 minutes trying normal jumps to get over a pillar that fucking tells you how to get over/around it. Sure, I get it, Cuphead was a hell of a tough game, but holy shit he's bad. You'd almost expect a gamin…
/r/MGTOW03/06/19 02:59 PM
3

Next thing you know, they'll be asking men to wash their hands for them, before breaking out in rape claims whether you do or don't.
/r/MGTOW02/06/19 02:01 AM
1

"Whoever invented marriage was creepy as hell. Like I love you so much I'm gonna get the government involved so you can't leave." - Jim Carrey "I think when you are young, you are hoping that this person will be the right one, the one you are going to be in love with forever but sometimes you want that so much you create something that isn't really there." - Johnny Depp "Marriage is hard man. Marriage is so hard Nelson Mandela got a divorce. Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in a South African priso…
/r/MGTOW01/06/19 06:03 AM
1

Pass. Unless you want to look like a hypocrite for letting her in despite your profile saying no single moms. Which... I don't think would be exactly "healthy". Not to mention how anonymous online dating is; you don't know if she's actually a modest conservative and not-entirely-insane (still AWALT, but with shades of NAWALT); you don't know if she'll swipe the condom and impregnate herself with your child and demand child support. You don't know if she'll be honest about getting her tubes tied,…
/r/MGTOW30/05/19 05:59 AM
14

The JaYwAlKiNg clip of two female bicycle cops is another one.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 07:48 PM
1

24 female virgin you can pick any 2 of these, but not all 3, if you want to be believed on the internet. My anxiety This is what having a drink or three at clubs is for, or otherwise a psychiatrist/doctor to prescribe you some feel-better pills. Beyond that, unless a guy is looking for a pity fuck, no one cares about your anxiety. I want to be a housewife... So if you're 24, how long before you change your mind and decide cooking & cleaning is too much for you bother with for your husband? How l…
/r/MGTOW22/01/19 02:10 AM
1

At this point, it's not the ad that was the issue. It wasn't the "toxic masculinity" showcase. Or the "be better men" lecture. It's not even about a shitty marketing strategy backfiring. What it's about now: at least some of them were attempting to doxx this cunt's date over a commercial. Protect yourselves out there, men.
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 06:15 AM
1

and even when you take her words at face value; her intonation implies that dude at Starbucks would be losing anything he has [to her].
/r/MGTOW17/01/19 08:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter