TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Throwawayingaccount Archive

View 9 posts and 1,077 comments by Throwawayingaccount on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,077 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why are you marking the federal senators as decision makers? This would be a state level issue, to be raised in the state legislatures. Senator Warnock and Senator Ossoff would have no real input here (beyond clout).
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:39 PM
31

No, I am against using payment processors as censorship. Let the game fail on it's own merits. Not because we're fucking with fundamentals of our economic system.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 02:32 AM
39

How is this related to men? This subreddit should be laser focused on issues that target men, or males. This targets a race, not a gender or sex.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 06:14 AM
3

I would be against such a rule change. I believe Sex/Gender/Raceshould not be a deciding factor in who can and cannot post here. I welcome people to post here to ask questions, even if that person is vehemently against what this sub stands for, so long as they do so respectfully. I also welcome people to post here with contradictory facts they can back up. By all means, if there is a specific fact based claim that can be made against a point someone posts here, then yes, I welcome such.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:24 AM
1

What was your post that got deleted? I cannot rightfully judge the appropriateness of moderation without knowing what was acted upon.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:13 PM
1

No, the facts do back me up. I didn't say they're high paying. I said they're higher paying than jobs with similar amounts of skill/effort. Janitors earn around ~36k/year average. Garbage collectors earn ~45k/year average. Sources: https://www.bls.gov/OOH/building-and-grounds-cleaning/janitors-and-building-cleaners.htm https://www.bls.gov/oes/2023/may/oes537081.htm
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 06:54 AM
22

I agree with your overall sentiment. However, some particulars come across as wrong. >"Man up" / stoicism conditioning coming from conservative ideology I believe conservative ideology identified and acknowledged it, and built around it. People noticed that when men showed their emotions, they were belittled. So they stopped doing it, and also encouraged those they care about to stop doing it, so they will not suffer the same consequences. I would say this one is from NEITHER side. >Male disposa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 11:47 AM
-3

Giving birth IS a significant health risk. Sure, it's not 100% equivalent, but it's not completely wrong either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 06:01 AM
11

One of the core problems men face when dating... They're given a set of rules to follow. But breaking those rules is usually forgiven if the man is successful in asking someone out. "Don't ask out the cashier, it's creepy." "But Greg six pack did, and it worked out fine for him, and he got a relationship out of it." Because of that, these 'rules' don't feel like actual rules. They feel like penalties for unattractive people to attempt. If we had some magic way of punishing men who attempt things…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 05:46 AM
7

>The Red Pill Narrative claims men are "waking up" to a rigged, feminist society and fighting back by withdrawing. But checking out isn't an act of power; it's an act of absence. Interesting. Do you also believe that a group of workers unioninzing and going on strike is the same way, an act of absence rather than power?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 05:24 AM
133

I looked at the study. One of the questions asked is: "Focused on a woman who you figured was unlikely to tell anyone if you kept going" And that's counted as "using a tactic or strategy to sleep with a woman who didn't consent." That could EASILY be interpreted as "Did you want to have sex with someone who you thought would keep the fact you had sex private?", especially to someone who's first language is not English. And that is a 100% reasonable stance that is in no way sexual violence. Here'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 07:33 AM
11

The availability of sperm samples REMOVES control, as should the law be disregarded, pregnancy can start without his knowledge or direct interaction.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 11:36 AM
32

Counterpoint: According to the figures, 72% of men said their partner’s past sexual partners do not bother them, compared with 66% of women. In dating/relationships, self reported preferences are unreliable at best. Especially when there's a stigma against a certain answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 02:18 PM
4

Lower right corner of the 2nd image. It's a four pointed star. Google Gemini puts that on all images it creates, and people often use that mark to just ignore stuff.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 10:07 PM
15

The google AI watermark really detracts from the picture. Many people will see that and just outright ignore what it says.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 05:29 PM
1

Given how often MRA and Gamergate are conflated by those outside of those circles, I feel that it would be prudent to name AlisonPrime, someone associated with the Gamergate movement. A white male who pretended to be a woman in some sort of catfishing scam, that tried to prey on members of Gamergate. It's... odd.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 06:22 PM
15

Even 62 million page views seems high. Is there any chance it's actually 62 million HTTP requests? To a non programmer, the difference might be confusing, but each page view can cause many HTTP requests. For example, go hit F12 right now (On firefox/chrome, I'm unsure what it is off the top of my hands on other browsers) to bring up developer tools. Then go over to the 'network' tab that opens up. Then on the bar below 'network' hit the 'all' button. That will show you every single HTTP request …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 11:09 AM
3

The way I read the posts, they were pro-circumcision. Which is an abhorrent stance to me. But not an inherently pedophilic one.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 06:15 AM
56

Would accusing a woman of having 'flat chest energy' be misandry then?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 12:49 PM
50

The end of the article aggrivates me. Yes, Incels became louder thanks to the internet. The solution isn't to hide facts and feelings of others from them. Telling them to logoff feels like saying "Hey, you know how you learned on the internet that there's other people in similar situations? IGNORE THOSE FACTS, Bury your head in the sand! Go be a loser all alone! And for god's sake, STOP UNIONIZING!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 01:21 AM
4

When you ask this question, you will always want to specify WHERE you are talking about. The world is a VAST place, with myriad cultures. What is true in the US may not be true in a rural village in Africa, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:42 PM
43

>Many of the alpha male effects in nonhuman animals are caused by behavior in captivity, simulating the competitive sociology of prisons rather than the natural state of being. Counterpoint: Society is in many ways like a prison, thus for men in modern society, making the situation 'alpha male' was discovered in, an apt comparison.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 06:41 AM
2

When have you heard any of them specifically attribute masculinity? That's where I'm putting the bar.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 08:11 PM
2

What I'm saying is women have plenty of role models who emphasize the fact they're women. But there's very few role models that emphasize that they are men, and bring attention to masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 08:07 PM
8

Notice that all of the examples you give are of fictional people.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:37 PM
7

What did David Gandy say anyway?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 06:56 PM
7

What does this have to do with this subreddit? Are males extra susceptible to this malady?
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:21 AM
1

I have not heard of this. Could someone provide a link?
/r/MensRights28/11/25 09:56 PM
5

In America at least, the first signs of which gender is actually cared about will occur shortly after birth. Where a male infant can have parts of their genitals cut off, permanently removing body parts for non-medical reasons before they can even think. But we rightfully protect female infants from similar. Also, look into birth control. When there were just TALKS of removing accessability to female birth control due to health concerns, people were up in arms, and they were absolutely in the ri…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:10 AM
1

If you're asking if pickup artistry works... Yes, it works quite well usually. Sure, there's some grifters out there preying on lonely men, promising them easy women. But public PUA forums have a lot of advice that works quite well. And it's also often AGAINST the advice women give. Women give advice over what they think they are attracted to. And people are notoriously bad at judging themselves. This is no exception. PUAs give advice that's been guided by statistical analysis of what works and …
/r/MensRights19/10/25 06:52 PM
69

What inevitably happens when men create their own space... is the space is forced to become an inclusive space, and thus no longer male centric. Once it's no longer male centric, it's no longer good at treating men's issues, as speaking about them is declared misogyny for promoting the already privileged people or such. https://x.com/reactjpg/status/1272042422340669440 Power rangers, D&D, Superhero comics, etc...
/r/MensRights16/10/25 12:33 PM
27

Most people are heterosexual, and most prisoners are male.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:20 PM
43

You missunderstand the primary issue I have. It is not that they do not actively support men's issues. It's that they CLAIM they work for equality and thus there is no need for specific support of men, while simultaneously ignoring men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 05:28 PM
3

You ask us to contact you on Discord. Yet you do not give out a discord ID, but rather a link to someone else's reddit profile?
/r/MensRights08/10/25 08:02 AM
5

Self defense might count?
/r/MensRights13/08/25 05:33 PM
1

Politics are intrinsically linked with the battle for rights. This new policy will (if fully enacted) disproportionately target men, and disproportionately incarcerate them.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 10:49 PM
7

due to researchers terminating trials as the side effects were deemed unacceptable despite being similar to female birth control side effects I believe this is not quite accurate, at least for research from the 1990s onward, simply because medical research changed to be more 'for profit' then. And the trials wouldn't terminate because the side effects are unacceptable, but rather because the side effects would prevent FDA (Or it's equivelant in other countries) from approving the medication. The…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:42 PM
24

Thank you for reaching out, and actually inquiring with the other side as to their views, rather than accepting a straw-manned version. In practice, many of Feminism's actions are decidedly anti-men, and when called out on it, they retreat to the definitions of preaching equality, rather than the actions they performed. A great example of this: Birth control pills. There is controversy around female birth control availability, with feminists largely being for having said birth control be availab…
/r/MensRights18/07/25 09:03 PM
18

I generally use the lottery as an example. "So many rich people won the lottery, thus playing the lottery must be a responsible financial move!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 10:47 AM
4

By "Old world" and "New world" I am referring to Europe/Asia/Africa and North/South America. Landmasses separated by oceans that had no cultural influence on one another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:49 AM
9

The roles developing similarly in both old world and new world certainly points towards it being inherent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:33 AM
13

It would be counterproductive and ultimately self-defeating if implemented. Gender roles exist largely because people TEND to exhibit certain behaviors depending on the amount of sex dependent hormones they have. Do some people not react the same way to said hormones? Sure. Do some people have different amounts of said hormones than others of their sex? Sure. There have been studies about toys being given to young chimpanzees. The female chimpanzees preferred dolls. The male chimpanzees preferre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 05:01 AM
16

What do you think of this encouraging news? Why else might this be? Here's my hypothesis: Young men noticed that the left was in power, and that those in power were actively harming men unjustly with their policies, so they rallied against the ones in power. Now that who's in power has shifted, and it's obvious things aren't better, they're swinging back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/25 01:46 PM
15

This is conflating two related, but separate questions. 1) What determines how many incels there will be? 2) How is it determined who ends up being one? All teaching incels new skills will do is increase competition in the dating market.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:03 PM
9

Honestly, the ADL should never have gotten big. Their first major act was SO brazen of discrimination, they had the LITERAL KKK DEFEND A BLACK MAN.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 12:35 PM
24

I want to start writing about it, a book…and maybe articles too. This is appreciated, and will further the cause, but I do not believe this to be the best way. If you want to do it because you want to write, and are merely choosing a topic, then yes. But there's plenty of people writing about the issues already. The problem is that the articles fall on deaf ears. Where I believe the issue is best fought is calling out people gently, when it's a person who seems that they might be open to changin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 05:45 PM
13

> Anti-DEI nazis complains about a black guy and a female mc in AC shadows.(due to being racist an sexist) So, I can't really speak too much about the female protagonist. But regarding Yasuke, the concerns are legitimate. Yasuke is an actual person who we know existed. He was a retainer for a samurai. There is little else we know about him that is confirmed true. Likely it's just that a really rich guy thought "Hey, this foreign person has skin that's colored like a burn, but isn't burned. How n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 07:29 PM
5

They are from all over the country. Irrelevant, if it's a self-selecting sample. Let me offer an alternative hypothesis: Courts that stream on Youtube have statistically different outcomes of custody disputes than courts that do not stream on Youtube.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:12 PM
11

This raises the question: Are court trials that make it to Youtube a representative sample of courts?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 02:44 PM
0

Remember when we said he could declassify things just by thinking about it, rendering it safe to store in a bathroom?
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:02 PM
-8

Stronger border security deporting illegals. His deportation rate is roughly half of the average under Biden. He's doing a shitty job.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:02 PM
4

Legalize WIN-18446 as a prescription drug, and make it well known it was Democrats that did this. Oral birth control options for males have been known about since the 1970s. Yet regardless of which party is in power, it has not been legal to prescribe. Do they have downsides? Yes. That's a conversation to have between doctor and patient.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:01 PM
-1

Unusual answer here but... Take steps to lower microplastic pollution. I believe that microplastics have a negative effect on female libido. Naturally, male and female libido are much closer to being balanced than they are currently, and I think microplastics are at least partially to blame.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 06:52 AM
42

how would one even begin to abolish "the traditional male gender role"? The place to start will be to look at why those gender roles exist, and what happens to those who do not conform to those roles. We have to not just TELL men it's okay to be non-traditionally masculine, we also have to ensure that doing so doesn't reduce the likelihood of social success. I remember back in 2010 ish... Emma Watson was fighting against gender roles, saying you don't need to be macho. At the same time she was d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 03:50 PM
1

Donald Trump has said he would bring Tom Homan, a Project 2025 contributor, into his administration if he wins November's election. https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-says-project-2025-author-coming-onboard-if-elected-1966334 He seems to be getting into position to grant favors to people in charge of 2025.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 02:58 PM
-2

One of the authors of Project 2025 claimed former President Donald Trump has “blessed” the project and is “very supportive of what we do, https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/08/15/what-we-know-about-trumps-link-to-project-2025-as-author-claims-ex-president-blessed-it-in-secret-recording/
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:00 AM
3

That is a great point, and something that should be discussed between doctor and patient, rather than the government stepping in and saying "NO" Also, I live in a country without socialized medicine. A father who does the bare minimum to support their child here is at minimum out ~80k for child support over 18 years. That can mean the difference between affording preventative care and not affording it. So yes, there are health issues, although less than those associated with pregnancy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 05:32 PM
4

There have been three or four others since then. All with side effects reasonably on par with female birth control pills. Yet they're not approved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/24 04:09 AM
14

Male birth control. We've known about WIN-18446 for longer than I've been alive. It's an effective male oral birth control pill. If taken properly, side effects are similar in severity to female birth control. Admittedly, it is both easier and worse to take incorrectly. Yet even if a doctor and patient agree that WIN-18446 is appropriate for a patient, it is illegal to prescribe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 01:45 PM
7

Especially since herbivore means not eating meat. And generally when meat is used in a sexual context, it refers to male genitalia.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:48 PM
0

Where is the line drawn when there is a race with the same name as a religion?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/24 09:09 PM
5

Because insurance premiums for insurance obtained through employment is often taken directly out of wages. Due to some tax purposes, the payment HAS to come from one person, or there's some additional penalties.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:03 PM
15

If there's a constant expense shouldered by one parent, such as insurance, then that should be factored in.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:13 AM
5

Instead it is for the most part a consequence of the material conditions of capitalism as it exists now. I am unsure of this. I have an alternate hypothesis. Microplastic polution negatively impacts female libido more than male libido.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 02:33 PM
23

The line of logic you quoted is infantalizing women and denying them agency. It's effectively going up and saying "I know she SAID she wanted sex, but I know better than her. She doesn't want it by the way."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/24 07:43 PM
22

“if I were that guy, I’d just look for another girl and not worry about this person’s reaction because I’m not the problem, nor the one at fault.” While this IS a reasonable reaction, it shouldn't be painted as the ONLY reasonable reaction. Let's replace one genetic trait, and it's accompanying negative stereotype in the comic with another genetic trait that is commonly discriminated against. A woman shows she is the target of several thefts or attempted thefts by African Americans. An African A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/24 08:53 PM
-2

First slide Not all female teachers There's already a massive difference in what you're proposing. A person does not choose whether they are a man or woman. (They might choose how to express it, but even in the case of transgender people, it's not a choice so much as a discovery.) A person absolutely chooses to pursue a specific career.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:36 AM
2

Why was there a switch in the first place? The ability to use office applications is a much more applicable skill than the ability to program. And there's a LOT of employers that don't understand the difference, they just want someone "Who knows computers" Generally when you need someone who knows computers, you want Office application skills. On the other hand, actual application programming is something that most computer specialists don't really deal with. IT uses very little programming. Hel…
/r/MensRights27/06/24 06:53 PM
16

Attention seeking women always comes to me and says they choose bear over men Because this means "A woman is willing to lie in order to make men look and/or seem worse than giving an honest answer.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 07:49 AM
21

So, when I've seen women talk about men claiming that the man thinks a girl owes him a date, I've spoken with that man. And the times I've done it, that man's views aren't "She owes me a date", but rather "Why is she going out with someone who beat his past two girlfriends, rather than me?" There's a subtle distinction there, but it makes a huge difference. One is about thinking "I deserve X", the other is about saying "Performing X with person Y is very risky. If you must perform X, why with Y …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:20 PM
4

Well, there is a difference between sexual assault and rape. If someone grabs a woman's breasts without permission, that is sexual assault, but not rape. Perhaps the reconciliation of these statistics is due to this difference?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:16 PM
31

The association with the right wing is what's really strange to me. Most incels I've spoken to are very left leaning. Pro pot legalization, increase funding for public schools, etc...
/r/MensRights14/04/24 12:11 AM
1

If they post your picture, using a DCMA takedown might be more effective.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:15 PM
56

We believe the algorithm will negatively shift things with that word in it. Much like how youtubers say someone "Unalived themselves" to avoid saying the word for it, which is heavily penalized in the algorithm.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 01:35 PM
1

Many of the comments about these attendees would likely be construed as transphobic if they were from anyone else. They effectively boil down to "I know they said they're non-binary, but let's face it, they're men."
/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:32 PM
3

Would you call a man who’s waiting until marriage an incel? Or a man who would be open to having sex before marriage but hasn’t met the right women? No. Neither of those count as involuntary. Just because someone not desiring sex means they are not an incel, doesn't mean that someone who desires sex is necessarily an incel.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:05 PM
24

What country do you live in? Court systems are highly dependent upon country.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 06:21 PM
6

In my opinion a male virgin isn’t automatically an incel I agree. Part of being an incel is that it is involuntary. If someone genuinely does not desire sex, they are not an incel. it’s the attitude that makes him an incel. Yeah no. It's like going "Just because you don't have money doesn't make you poor. It's complaining about how unfair the system is that makes you poor."
/r/MensRights08/01/24 06:13 PM
21

https://i.imgur.com/Crcds3f.jpg For context, this is about another content creator, Pikamee who was harassed for having played Hogwarts Legacy to the point where she retired from content creation.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:03 PM
29

I agree that he shouldn't be harassed. However, he was pro-harassment earlier when people were playing the 'wrong' video games. I hope when he returns, he reflects upon his earlier views.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 03:42 PM
2

The same law explicitly excluded coverage for male condoms, male vasectomy, and any future male pill. I've never heard this. Could you please provide more info?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 01:26 PM
2

Here's one that I honestly think will make a massive difference, though it's full effects won't be apparent for several years. Write to your congressmen (or equivalent, I don't know what country you are from) about legalizing Fertilysin, also known as WIN-18446. It's a male oral birth control that's been known about since the 1970s. Yes, it does have some significant side effects. But if taken properly, the side effects are on par with female oral birth control. It should be between a patient an…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 05:23 PM
2

People who don't follow the beliefs of the subreddit, and even those who are banned from a subreddit can still downvote items within it.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 05:17 PM
12

the tide is finally shitting Uhh.... Was that intentional?
/r/MensRights14/12/23 11:12 PM
8

Karma farming. Having spare accounts with karma, so that they 'look' more real can help push discussions by making it harder to determine who's real vs GPT.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/23 03:17 PM
0

So, I don't think this is due to the gender of the single parent (At least not directly). We all know courts are unlikely to award a father single custody compared to a mother. The father usually has to prove both extreme parenting competence on himself, AND that the mother is a danger to their children in order for the father to be granted custody. Given that the courts will only award custody to fathers who have proven themselves so much, is it any wonder that the fathers who are chosen fare b…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:16 PM
-3

Sounds like a scam artist, posing as a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:34 PM
7

People start using words in an different way FOR A REASON. Yes, I agree this is true. They probably started using it for awful person because of their experience with incels who were awful people. I do not believe this is the reason. I believe it is instead that they believe a man's value is linked to their ability to find a mate.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:02 PM
14

Please explain how it's a straw man.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 10:39 PM
4

Incels don't see women as sex objects. So, I got something entirely different out of what you replied to. They didn't say that too many incels see women as sex objects, but rather "too many men see women as sex objects". A fair portion of the most sexually successful men I've met in college did see women as sex objects. Seeing women as a sex object IS a fairly prevalent view. The problem is that it is ascribed to the wrong holders.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 09:41 PM
35

No, from what I've observed, that's a different group of people. We must not make the mistake of believing those that oppose us are a monolithic group.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 07:16 PM
40

If the incels who are awful people are the loudest and most visible, yes it will morph into meaning awful person AKA: if you are being left behind by societal norms, shut up about it, or we'll villify you.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:57 PM
64

Words usually change meanings from "what they mean" into "What people associate with what they mean" In this case, it shows that 'loser' is associated with 'man who can't have sex'
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:19 PM
437

A big part of incels that is rarely spoken about. The fact that a word who's original meaning, and entymology literally means "Person unable to find a sexual partner" has morphed into "awful person" speaks VOLUMES as to the views of the people who use this word to mean "awful person" Generally, those I've heard to be most vocally against incels are ALSO those who keep talking about how we need to deconstruct toxic masculinity, and that toxic masculinity is based around the 'lie that sexual activ…
/r/MensRights27/11/23 04:05 PM
5

It is funny seeing leftist assumptions of conservative voters. What do you mean? The description given here is of right wing politicians, not right wing voters.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:18 PM
0

Which side is more likely to fuck things up so much that the draft is activated? It's gonna be the side that goes "We have nukes, why don't we use them"
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:15 PM
28

it equally hurts for both men and women. No, I don't think so. Let's look at this from a strategy perspective of a live birth mammal that needs to manually raise offspring. When a male is cheated on, there's a chance that he will spend years of his life, and significant resources raising a child he is not genetically related to. When a female is cheated on, there's no such risk for the female. The biggest risk is that the partner is more likely to leave (Which is also present for the reverse sit…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 09:50 AM
3

Could a moderator sticky this? This video is good to have a discussion around, but this is VITAL information.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 11:20 PM
2

If it does exist, it is an equally poor term for the phenomenon.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:37 PM
10

language evolves. incel now has another (more popular?) meaning Fair. But this transformation of the language is itself problematic. Taking a word that means "Person unable to get laid" and having it's meaning be transformed into "Awful person" is by itself indicative of society's views of men who are unable to have sex.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:06 AM
4

Chad actually likes women and wants to spend time with them, timothy wants to extract sex and attention from women without caring about women's attraction or desires. Dark triad traits correlate positively with the amount of sex a man has.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 06:33 PM
2

I do not believe this. Everyone thinks "No, I'm hard to manipulate." The average person is of average manipulatability.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 06:20 PM
-4

Now, granted, most of what they do is statistical analysis, rather than the scientific method, but it IS quite often used. Take a look at field reports. They keep track of what they did, and what the outcome is. Those reports are collected, collated, and analyzed for patterns. Go ahead and read on https://np.reddit.com/r/PickUpArtist/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 05:26 PM
10

Men cannot elicit "these strong emotions in order to hook a woman". I disagree with this point. If what you are saying is true, then let's rephrase it by looking at it from another side: "The opinions of a woman towards a man are uninfluenced by the man's actions." That is patently absurd. This cannot be true, as the aforementioned 'strong emotions' are not evenly distributed between men. Further, PUA communities utilize the scientific method to determine the best way (or at least find better wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 04:50 PM
21

First, when was IT a "woman's job?" Is she talking about telephone operators or something? That wasn't exactly a high tech position that required extensive training, was it? That's actually a fair question. So originally, when computers were big monstrosities that filled entire rooms, yes, the operators were primarially men. However, there was a brief period, where computers were common enough for data entry, and having simple computations done over large data sets (The type of thing you'd do in…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 12:28 PM
5

diluted bleach is safe to drink So while I wouldn't call it 'safe to drink', regular bleach if diluted isn't as bad as people think it is. On the other hand, color safe bleach is REALLY bad even if diluted.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:01 PM
-8

No, he has a good point. Small amounts of bleach over a long period of time won't build up. There are toxins that DO get worse after having small amounts for a long time, like mercury. However bleach (or at least regular bleach, color safe bleach is very different) has to be ingested at once for there to be significant harm.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:00 PM
53

I fundamentally dislike the idea of banks (Yes, I'm aware that Paypal is technically not a bank. I don't care what loopholes they find, it's a goddamn banking institution.) being able to control who you can and cannot send money to (Unless the proposed transaction is illegal). In the US, we have Fiat currency. Money is valuable because we can exchange it for goods and services. Restricting who I can send money to is literally lowering the value of money to me, because I can't use it for certain …
/r/MensRights26/09/23 06:15 PM
-28

Are these men really consenting; or are they mentally unwell, are they vulnerable, lonely, and in need of support? I'm going to say the same thing I've told many feminists. Just because a relationship doesn't fit with your preconceived notions of acceptability, doesn't mean the people in it are unwell. Does this particular kink have increased amounts of mentally unwell people? I find it likely. But it's not inherent enough to be guaranteed.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 06:09 PM
26

If the law is written in a gender neutral manner, I would not be surprised if more women run afoul of it than men. I've seen quite a few "Visit my onlyfans" messages.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 11:46 AM
4

Their argument against this idea (i.e., the responses from raginghappy and Vagina_wielder) is that when a rapist is in the vicinity he's going to rape a woman, any woman, and a woman dressed like a tart, a floozy, and/or being drunk is merely making herself more of a target. Dressing more modestly and/or being sober just means that some other woman will get raped. While there is some truth to this situation, it is not an absolute, for two separate reasons. The fact the first was discounted is ac…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:35 PM
2

I have never heard of this. Could you link to the studies?
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:28 PM
2

The medication has it's downsides, I agree. However, it should be between doctor and patient to decide if the downsides are worth it or not.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:04 AM
14

He will have bodily autonomy Okay. Have him ask his Doctor for WIN-18446, a male birth control pill known about for fifty years. He won't get it. It's illegal to prescribe. Tell me more about his bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:19 PM
12

Not alimony in general, or in any specific circumstance. He did ban it in specific circumstances. When the marriage is under 3 years.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 12:52 AM
3

They can get a partner, but he (or she) would be more likely to see her as a "kid wife", instead of a grown-up woman. I agree with your entire post, except this part. You're acting like this is inherently a bad thing. 1) Some people will prefer this. 2) Even among those who do not prefer this over a normal spousal relationship will likely see this as an improvement over being alone for their entire life.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 07:17 PM
39

I'm going to institute a DMCA takedown request immediately, and I suggest every single guy take these groups very seriously. Something that's relevant here, since copyright law is involved. The copyright is held by whoever took the picture. You may need to get a statement from whoever took the picture that transfers the copyright to you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/23 04:09 PM
-1

This is dangerously close to anti-vaxxer logic. "Thing X rarely happens, so the effort we spend to prevent X is unnecessary." No, it could just as easily mean that it's needed, AND successful in it's goal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/23 06:15 PM
29

4) After birth, the woman can drop the child at a save haven. I want to add, this exists because infanticide is so common. So they added this so that mothers have an alternative to killing their newborns. So, I ask this: How many newborns must men kill to get out of paying child support, for them to have an equivalent option? Uncomfortable question, isn't it? How many people do we need to murder to get equivalent rights? Because let's face it. That's the reason why the right was given to women.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:18 PM
2

This raises an important question: What percentage of ALL tweets (sent by a human) were sent by women? Is that also ~50%? If it's less than 50%, that means a tweet from a woman is MORE likely to be misogynistic than a tweet from a man.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:13 PM
-13

No, it absolutely does. Because if there is any reason someone can be on trial without it being publicly available knowledge, then the government can put ANYONE on trial without it being publicly available knowledge, and simply claim it falls under one of the exemptions.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 02:33 AM
-17

Knowing who is on trial and when is a vital part of preventing secret courts. Let me ask this: Would you rather a guarantee that all people charged with rape are publicly known, OR The government being able to say "oh, this person... we can't tell you why he's not here, or even let you verify that his trial is fair, because it falls into an exception. You also can't verify that it falls into an exception, you'll just have to take our word on it."
/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:45 AM
13

No, the double definitions is intentional. It's so that people can attack incels using one definition, and when called out on it, use the other definition.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:31 PM
2

I never quite understood why. Oh, that's easy. If an incel is someone who is unable to have consentual sex with someone of the (or a) sex they are attracted to, regardless of how far their standards are lowered, it is impossible for there to be heterosexual incels of both sexes simultaneously within a population (with the exception of those who are themselves unable to consent to sex). To explain a little further. Imagine a man, we'll call him Glorph. Glorph is a deformed, and ugly heterosexual …
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:25 PM
12

As a left-wing straight white dude, this presents an issue--what am I allowed to have an opinion on? Or, more precisely, on what issues can I contribute to the conversation with my own independent faculties of reason and empathy? What I suggest is turning this around on them, to make them see the absurdity of it. If you're not at risk of being handed a gun and being flung overseas due to a diplomatic blunder, you have no say in foreign policy. If you're not at risk of raising a child you didn't …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/23 06:44 PM
27

There is a difference between being someone who genuinely cares about women and gets bullied out of feminist spaces and only entering women’s spaces to bait people into time-wasting arguments, which is what she means by “trolls.” I agree that there is a difference between the two groups, and both exist. The problem is that many people of the first group are labeled as the second group for daring to question things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 10:06 PM
2

Firstly, you don't deserve anything. Interesting statement to start off with on a left wing sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/23 02:12 PM
47

No one is forced to be a single mom To be fair: death of the father is a thing that can happen.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 01:28 PM
11

The Scottish Government is listening to comments here: https://consult.gov.scot/criminal-justice/reforming-the-criminal-law-to-address-misogyny/consultation/
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:09 PM
8

You /are/ aware that incels are men and women, not just men, aren't you? I challenge this point. Female incels are rare to the point of practically not existing. Part of being an incel is that one cannot have consensual sex with a person of the gender they are attracted to, no matter how much they lower their standards. This is the involunary part of incel. It's the difference between someone with too high of standards vs someone actually unable to find a partner. There cannot be an incel of bot…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:18 AM
32

I am appalled at Katherine Schweit's statements. Yes, what the shooter did was unexcusable. But he had very real motivations, and the paper gives immense insight as to why. This wasn't just some mental illness that made him think he was helping people by killing alien impostors or something... They're talking about banning guns. That wouldn't have stopped this. At best, it would have changed the shooting to a mass stabbing, or perhaps usage of molotovs. A body count of three isn't hard to reach …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/23 04:17 AM
3

Seems to be back open.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:46 PM
21

whats counts as a majority? Majority is typically defined as "Over half" Over two-thirds is commonly called a supermajority.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:45 PM
14

To be fair, toilets are one of the most important inventions ever. It revolutionized sanitation. People no longer needed to expose themselves to other peoples feces. The spread of disease went way down.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:55 PM
2

The competition goes way up when the chaff is removed. I don't really understand how. Suppose there's a basketball team recruiting, and they get 100 applicants for 5 spots. 75 of said applicants are allergic to basketballs and will break out in a rash if they touch one. They are 100% incompatible with the task of being a professional basketball player. If the 78 allergy havers didn't apply to the team's recruitment drive, it wouldn't much impact the level of competition among the remaining 25. T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 04:55 PM
19

While free market ideas ARE highly relevant, they cannot be blindly applied to the dating marketplace, and you have to be familiar with the way all of the metaphorical gears fit together, since some of them are different. For example: in a real free market, if there's an unusual spike in demand for oh say... umbrellas, the market can react to that and start producing more umbrellas. Meanwhile in the dating market, if there's a spike in demand for tall Asian women, the market can't really adapt t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 03:54 PM
2

That's all meds from Tylenol to your arthritis meds. I mean Tylenol + Alcohol is bad, sure. But the interaction with win 18446 is REALLY bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 01:22 PM
7

Nah, we've discovered one way back in the 1970s. It's called WIN-18446. Now, there IS a big downside to it. Potentially fatal interactions with alcohol. We know it works, we know it's major downside, no further research has been done into it, it's not legal to prescribe (for birth control at least.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/23 10:51 PM
26

risk of potential side effects against the risk of whatever condition you'd have from not taking it Well, in the US, where health care is for profit, having less money due to paying child support has very real impacts on the ability to recieve health care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/23 07:50 PM
2

Please do not promote Autism as some sort of tradeoff. It's really not. Sure, specific individuals with autism sometimes have unusual skills that can make up for it. But overall, it comes across as "But what about the GOOD things that come from being born without legs?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/23 03:24 PM
15

Indeed. It is important to consider the most absurd things to be included and absurd to not be included, when considering the validity of data.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 12:10 PM
25

Not really. The data is indicating that young women are having more sex than young men. The only way that can happen is if women are skipping the 'undesireable' men, and are all sleeping with the 'high value' men. Alternatively, young women are having sex with older men.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:37 PM
2

I was experiencing some serious instability. The entire site has been unstable for me too, it's not just you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 04:18 PM
-4

Very good point about these people being against the idea of gender being a social construct while saying there are things one must do outside of being an adult male to be a man. I don't agree with this point. Words can have multiple meanings. Take the word human for example. It can mean homo sapien. But at the same time, it is not hypocritical to call Hitler an inhuman monster, while simultaneously recognizing that he is indeed a homo sapien.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/23 08:20 PM
30

Not having sex doesn't make you an "incel". No, I'd say it does. The term has been motte and bailey-ed to hell and back. Associating with unpopular people costs social currency. Attacking them gains social currency. It's why picking on nerds in highschool was a thing. It's used to attack unpopular men, especially those who dare to defend themselves. And when they're called out on it, they switch definition, and defend that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/23 07:30 AM
1

despite those being the worst possible outcomes of a false accusation. No, a false CONVICTION is the worst possible outcome. Prosecution means being put on trial. Conviction means being found guilty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 12:54 PM
1

I as well am interested. I've read the portion of it you posted, and have evaluated it. I intended to send you a private message containing my evaluation, but I am unable to private message you.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 08:42 PM
7

Virgin is only an insult directes at straight men who want to have sex woth women, Nope. MGTOWs are commonly insulted as virgins, despite their organization literally being centered around not desiring women as companions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/23 09:47 PM
-3

If you think about it, all these “transgender” issues are only issues because of the ways we discriminate against men. There's also issues relating to dating. If a transgender woman is dating a straight man, there's a significant risk of her being murdered if the man finds out she used to be a man. That in and of itself isn't discrimination against a gender, (unless you count heterosexuality as discrimination) but is a significant risk to transgender people.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:11 PM
1

I agree with most of the points you bring up, aside from ONE crucial point, which causes your original statement to end up being wrong. It is entirely possible to talk people out of a position that contradicts their lived experiences. It's called gaslighting, and can be pretty darn effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:07 AM
2

Agreed, it just opens one up to a fairly obvious retort, vaguely reminding me of another exchange from a movie (I forget which one) "I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast." "You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 11:28 AM
-11

I'm not really seeing her calling out fat shaming as bad, only reacting to a specific insult addressed to her. Here's the exact quote: Being fat-shamed by Chinese state-owned media is a pretty weird experience even by my standards. But it's definitely going on my resume. That's... not exactly calling it out as bad, just that it coming from a state owned media outlet is unusual.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:14 AM
-5

I haven't followed Greta closely, could you provide evidence of her specifically calling out fat shaming?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:56 AM
14

So, first off, let's get a quote of the tweet yes, please do enlighten me. email me at [email protected] Okay, so the first thing I notice doesn't even have to do with the genital based insult. It's the fact she... insulted herself? Emails are a descriptor of the owner of the inbox, not the person sending messages. Okay, whatever, not the first time someone accidentally insults themself when trying to insult someone else. The real crux of what we are talking about here is the usage of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 03:30 AM
8

Thank you for the additional context. I did not know that relevant fact. It has however, not swayed my opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 03:05 AM
1

Cry in front of your girlfriend and see how your relationship with her changes. Cry in front of your friends and see how your relationship with them changes. You're right that it is this way. I'm saying it should not be this way.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 10:38 PM
1

Men should also be permitted to cry, without being ridiculed for it, or having it turned against them. I don't know how many would use it, but it should be an available option, without it's current downsides.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 07:42 PM
3

By the way, their sample sizes were N = 677 and N = 396. Obviously representative, right? While these sample sizes are a bit low, they're not awful sample sizes, provided they are truly randomly selected. If there's a sample size of 677, and it is truly randomly selected, There is a 95% chance the true value will be within 3.8% of the measured value of the random sample. The way sample sizes work is fascinating. There is very little difference in the accuracy of taking 3000 random people out of …
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:19 PM
2

Interesting. Thank you for the link, I will dig into the underlying study, but I have a feeling that the 7% and 4% figures are for people who are currently alive, which can highly skew statistics when talking about experiencing something that is intended to be fatal.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 07:40 PM
23

Indeed. I'd like to see comparisons over the number of men who have ever attempted suicide vs the number of women who have ever attempted suicide. I feel it is likely that the number of suicide attempts would be inflated by the low ratio of 'successful' suicides. As someone who attempts, and remains alive, is likely to still have the underlying psychological issues, and attempt suicide again. Whereas if the attempt is 'successful', there will be no further attempts.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:08 PM
13

That is the difference between a sexually successful abusive misogynistic Chad douchebag and a respectful obstensibly feminist white knight "Nice Guy" No, I don't think that is the case at all. The parallels between how antivaxxers are treated, and how nice guys treat women, and looking at the type of person who becomes each leads me to a different conclusion. Nice guys aren't simply just abusive douchebags who don't have the skills to pull women into relationships. Are some of them? Sure. All? …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 10:35 PM
1

If your goal is just to get superficial hookups, then PUA works. I hate it, but it works. If sex is your goal then it really is just a numbers game. If you're looking for actual romantic connections, treating it like a game is not healthy and won't work long term. Telling that to someone who is chronically unsuccessful at dating is like telling a starving man "Stop digging through the garbage like that, you'll never find a five course fine dining cuisine in there." Sure, it's not the ideal solut…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 10:32 PM
14

Addressing the second paragraph will make a lot of the "nice guy" entitlement issue go away, because the men being upset over being friend-zoned for saying and doing the right things will realize that they're just not vibing with her and that it's okay and time to move on to the next woman. I don't think that's the case, for two reasons Reason one: Social skills don't determine how many men remain dateless. It determines WHO becomes dateless. Trying to lower the amount of incels by teaching them…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 09:26 PM
1

There needs to be more resources for men looking for effective practical advice that is not hateful towards women yet acknowledges the social pressures that both genders face. The problem with that is: PUA comes to their conclusions about what works through experimentation, and statistical analysis. It is the natural conclusion of wanting to understand how best to attract women through a scientific lens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 09:04 PM
12

Why do we think that women with lots of partners are low value, but that this doesn't apply to men? Please don't use the lock/key analogy. I can tell you why I thought that. Think of it from an evolutionary perspective. The goal is to have children who pass on their genes. Two of the most important factors in success or lack thereof of one's children passing on their genes are: 1) The amount of resources spent raising the child. 2) The genes of the other parent. (Suppose the other parent has gen…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:39 PM
5

Trick questions, and academically ambiguous choices with very little distinction between the possible answers. I read it through, and this didn't seem true, at least for the questions it asked me. Could you give an example of such a question to me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/22 02:16 PM
4

Not scared, more cannot be bothered with the bad attitudes, More realistically, some of each. I'm not sure what the ratio is, however.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:14 PM
2

Hello, There are two ways a woman can help with the movement, which are largely mutually exclusive. Open support, and quiet support. Most people here have spoken about open support. It's worth reading, and no sense in repeating more of the same. Sadly, many people will close themselves off to our opinions if we are open about our affiliation. Our pleas, no matter how reasonable will be ignored because "MRA Incel!" Because of this, there are ways to support us that cannot be done by those who ope…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:41 PM
22

pretending these are the same is, at best, disingenuous. When most bosses/managers give out 'suggestions', not following them has consequences, just the same as if there was an order.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 02:20 AM
30

I'm not so sure there is a big difference, aside from plausible deniability from the person who gave the order. "Won't someone rid me of this meddlesome priest white male?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 01:30 AM
40

Feminists would lose their minds if men had a legitimately reversible birth control option Fun fact, there IS one. Discovered WAAAAY back in 1970s. WIN-18446 works as an oral male contraceptive. Now, there IS an elephant in the room about it. It has extremely bad (potentially fatal) interactions with alcohol. Is it legal for a doctor to prescribe, after you've been warned about the negative interactions? No. Has there been much research into stopping the negative interactions? No. Have you heard…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:55 AM
64

I think it's wrong to treat this as 'just' PTSD. When a soldier comes back with PTSD from the battlefield, they are perpetually looking out for gunfire or incoming mortars, and living in fear of it. These are things that are NOT reasonable fears in their current environment. They need therapy so that their fears line up with the safety of reality. When a man was falsely accused, and they fear for another false accusation, they are perpetually looking out for something that could reasonably happe…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:42 PM
3

and the woman chose to keep the baby for moral/religious reasons. What is the availibility of abortion like over in Russia? I wouldn't be surprised if it was availible 'on paper', but not actually availible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/22 12:55 PM
3

There are two groups of "real victims" There is a third, smaller group. Those who have been incorrectly accused as a result of mistaken identity.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:11 AM
10

This is the first feminists-matriarchal power structure men and boys encounter It's an early one to encounter sure, but the FIRST one is probably having the foreskin chopped off.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:20 PM
15

Alternatively to silence dissenters: Ban 50 legitimate Nazis, and the dissenter at the same time, to have them be conflated in other's minds. Or to have people think "Man the 3 people that I knew were banned were legit neo-Nazis, the rest probably are too, and the person that's complaining is just a Nazi trying to get back in, rather than someone with a legitimate complaint."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 04:18 AM
0

So, I don't know that much about women's razors. Men generally use razors for shaving facial hair off of their face and chin. This will be shaving a relatively small area with lots of curves and angles. Women generally use razors for shaving legs. These will be relatively long surfaces with fewer edges/corners to navigate. Does the difference in use case provide for actually different products, or is it just a different colored handle and some extra perfume?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:37 AM
46

I agree that she doesn't deserve her life ruined over this. HOWEVER : Reporting her AirBnB profile isn't "ruining her life".
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:35 AM
1

I used to have a speech impediment when I was younger. What got me to fix it? Being hopelessly ridiculed by my peers. Not the adults who tried being nice and teaching me that I was fine the way I was. Ostricism is an effective tool to get people to change, if change appears to be possible for them, without breaking their moral boundries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/22 02:56 PM
1

Which is kind of the definition of body shaming. He is being shamed for what his body shows that he does (or fails to do.) It's not like he's being shamed for having burn scars, or hair falling out. Those are things that have nothing to do with personality. Being fat on the other hand DOES indicate that one does not care enough to restrain caloric intake. It shows that one is indulgent without care to the side effects. It's like if you go into someone's house and there are fist shaped holes in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/22 02:40 PM
1

"large, red man" thinly veiled attack on his masculinity, white race and male gender. How? There's literally three words in the quote. Large: This sounds more like an attack on his weight, rather than his race/gender. And someone's weight actually DOES have a significant amount to do with their personality. Are there exceptions where someone genuinely can't gain/lose weight? Sure. Those are INCREDIBLY rare, and it's much more common for someone who is overweight to just be claiming they have suc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/22 02:36 PM
1

most of the criticism is targeted against those men's philosophy, not against their virginity. This is a motte and bailey. It has ALWAYS been an effective strategy to gain easy social currency by insulting the already unpopular. All that's changed is the 'justification' about why they're attacked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/22 02:24 PM
3

they filtered out people finding jobs. Actively looking, or just open to the idea? There's a huge difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/22 04:28 PM
8

I feel it's important to note, that it's not just high profile celebrities that are misogynistic and romantically successful. It's far more than just the upper elites.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/22 11:31 PM
1

Abortion being legal didn't stop this. Things need not be 100% effective to be helpful. The question shouldn't be: "Did this solve problem X", it should be "Did it reduce problem X enough to be worth the downsides?" Just like advising male teachers to not be alone with female students does not 100% prevent false accusations, it is still advisable and worth the downsides.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:11 PM
54

"YoU MuSt Be A MySoGoNist" as if I don't have friends that are women, sisters, nieces, etc. Again, just calling me names and belittling me for perceived failures. The especially aggrivating part of that comment, is that misogynists generally enter relationships with women FASTER than non-misogynists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/22 07:03 AM
2

That's a poor argument. "What they're doing is legal. But... what if they changed and did illegal stuff!"
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:12 PM
2

It must be a self affirmation tactic when you’re in denial. I'm not so sure about that. Openly attacking the already ostracized is a good way of gaining social currency.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:56 PM
1

Nope. Safe haven laws. In every single state, there is a way for a mother of a newborn to hand the infant off to a nurse or firefighter or something similar, and be absolved of responsibility. The exact rules, time limits, etc... differ from state to state. Some state's laws specifically limit it to just the mother. Others are worded so that it's impractical for the father to use them under most circumstances.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 08:20 PM
5

Let's look at it from another angle. Let's ignore abortion in it's entirety. Each state in the US has it's own safe haven laws. Some of them are actually restricted to just the mother. But even those that aren't actually restricted are practically restricted to the mother. So a mother CAN just drop a newborn off at a fire department, and be absolved of all responsibility, no questions asked. Why does this exist? In an attempt to reduce infanticide. Or, as I read it... women murdered so many chil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 08:34 PM
3

I don't know the consensus but personally I think it's good only if abortion is also freely accessible. The logic breaks down if you provide one but not the other. No, even without abortions, the logic still holds, given that there are safe havens that a new mother can drop an infant off at, and be free from any further obligations.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:59 PM
7

Yes. And I actually believe THAT is what drives the "nice guy" phenomenon. A man who WANTS to wait for sex, and to be respectful over it, will wait longer before asking for sex. And what do they get as a reward? A statistically much lower chance of being successful. They then hear women complain about how guys are too pushy for sex, and they want someone who will wait for it and go slowly. The exact thing they did, and were effectively punished for.
/r/seduction19/09/22 12:34 PM
1

Excellent question. I do not have a biology degree, only a few underclassmen biology courses, so I'm uncertain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 05:16 PM
8

It's not an issue of human rights in the sense that it can't be fixed with legal changes, I'd actually say that legal changes CAN help this situation (Not solve, but mitigate). But you have to look at it from an unorthodox angle. Many pollutants have an inhibiting effect on libido, which does NOT effect both genders equally. Reducing microplastic pollution, especially in foods might improve the dating market some, and legal changes can reduce microplastic pollution. People are fundamentally just…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 05:05 PM
12

Regarding point 1: Self improvement won't improve the situation as a whole. It just means someone ELSE will fall into the same pitfall. I know this is a bit extreme of a hypothetical, but imagine a deranged warden who decides that he'll have inmates race every day, and he'll send the slowest inmate to solitary confinement. Training the inmates to run faster does not fix the fundamental problem. Yes, it can prevent a specific inmate from punishment, but that just means it will fall upon someone e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 05:01 PM
3

Regarding the plumber scenario: You are extrapolating based on actions done purely by convicted and incarcerated criminals. That seems dishonest and misleading. However, that anecdote is still relevant for how the plumber reacted. Often, men in such situations are tolerant of such things, or even welcoming of them. This brings up an interesting point. A man reacts to catcalling from people he KNOWS are convicts and felons, the same way a woman often reacts to catcalling from strangers whom she k…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 04:54 AM
1

With greater wealth inequality, the more likely wealth is to be used as reason to select one relationship over another. Think of it this way: If wealth were perfectly evently distributed, then wealth difference could not be used as an effective criteria. As wealth difference increases, the usability of wealth as criteria improves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/22 03:25 PM
1

Based on what? the erosion of the middle class, decreased social mobility and general difficulty in becoming a high achiever contradict the idea that this is the best tactic, even assuming (again) The fact that male sexlessness is rising as the erosion of the middle class is occuring lends credence to the theory that finances are indeed a good way for a man to attract a mate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/22 03:16 PM
3

No, It's saying "Some men will be pidgeonholed into not having an LTR despite wanting one. However, which man it is, is not predetermined. The best way for a specific individual man to not become one of the leftover men, is often to attempt to woo a woman who seeks a high achiever."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/22 08:10 AM
4

The vast majority of men in LTRs out there aren't the kind of men the women described in the OP pursue. The problem is, there's more single men out there seeking an LTR than there are single women seeking an LTR. This means that you need to either lower the number of men looking for an LTR, increase the number of women seeking an LTR, or accept that some men are going to be looking for an LTR, and be pidgeonholed into not having one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/22 07:41 AM
1

Do you want to date these types of women? The alternative is dying alone. Settling is a reasonable choice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/22 03:38 AM
8

Why do you think the “woke crowd” doesn’t see the problem with what OP describes? Largely because of who we see defend the Mary Sue esque writing. Or even when the writing itself espouses woke principles, (or tries to). A great example of this is in a Justice League cartoon, people are protesting how superheroes have no oversight, and could just abuse their powers, with no regard as to the collateral damage. So what does wonder woman do? Use her lasso to out the lead protestor's sexual preferenc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 12:39 PM
18

There's another aspect to this. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. If a woman puts up a 'barrier' to keep out disrespectful men from getting to know her, then respectful men will respect it, and not get to know her. It is only the men who ignore the barrier (or that don't notice it in the first place, such as autists, but that's a rarity compared to those who ignore it) will ever get close to the woman. So then the woman will see that all men they've been with are the type of jerk who doesn't resp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/22 03:44 PM
6

I remember the battered women's shelter that was vandalized and shut down because they refused trans women. The problem is: there's no good way to have a women's only shelter without being transphobic, unless there's also a roughly equivalent amount of men's only shelters. You can either exclude trans women. OR You can give men who need help an incentive to misgender themselves, so they can receive succor from their abusive SO.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/22 02:12 PM
12

The 20k number is basically: "If approximately 20,000 more people lived in the right state, AND voted for Hillary, then she would have won the election."
/r/MensRights08/09/22 07:07 AM
6

I don't know if this is true or not, but I have heard that those stickers are for (or at least were originally for) paramedics. If there's a car crash, the paramedic would see the sticker, and know that the eight year old might just bite the paramedic's arm, or something similar.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 08:37 PM
1

The main reason why Men seek women so badly is because of a lack of intimacy&social validation. I do not believe this will work. Friendship socializing and intimiate socializing are separate things. Sure, one can mitigate the other, but both are needed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/22 02:42 PM
6

That way when we call women(and other men) in progressive spaces out, we're doing so with the moral high ground of practicing what we preach. I agree that this encompasses why we should strive to be better about it. It's a lot more effective than acting like some incel stereotype they have in their heads. However, I disagree with this point. I have acted this way, and my concerns were dismissed the last time I tried. It is very disheartening to see progressives make fun of a man that's pretty ob…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/22 01:54 PM
1

Yes, but that's not something fixed with "teaching"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/22 11:23 PM
2

I think many men who identify as shy and lonely could benefit from learning to be more emotionally expressive. From what I have seen, being more emotionally expressive does NOT help men. It makes them be seen as weak, and unstable. Men put on a stoic facade because it works, and it has been beaten into them since childhood that being expressive simply results in them being ostricized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/22 02:48 PM
6

There is another aspect that you are not mentioning: many men in our society do not learn and are not taught how to be a man and how to attract women. And there is a deeper aspect you haven't touched upon. A man's wealth level quite often effects his attractiveness to heterosexual women. Remember that article recently posted, about how many men were effectively too poor or not have a good enough job for a woman? With modern affirmative action often leading companies to push away men from desired…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/22 02:39 PM
16

That's part of it. There's also the fact that hormonal birth control on average lowers sex drive, so there's less push for companionship.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:07 PM
1

Seriously, name one country who has a major political party who explicitly adopts our values. South Korea, who's new president, Yoon Suk-yeol, is pretty openly anti-feminist, and ran on such a campaign.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 07:48 PM
1

That aside, however, the real question is why are anonymous redditors your measuring stick? Wouldn't being unable to find even one of the top 7 or whatever MRAs speak well of Tomassi and friends, In their defense: For a group that claims to be repeatedly silenced, measuring them by the number of people in an easily censorable position is not a good idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 07:47 PM
113

and the only thing they advocate for Men to actually do is "get therapy". Ironic, considering that going to therapy is negatively correlated with being in a relationship.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 03:09 AM
4

If someone willingly takes themselves out of the dating market, that removes the in from incel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 01:08 AM
3

The point I was trying to make is: Person A faces issues 1 and 2. Person B faces issue 2. Issue 1 is more pressing than issue 2. When person A is saying "HELP! I need help with 1!", then it's not helpful when person B responds with "Nah, you'll still have to deal with 2."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 08:26 PM
6

My experience with women is that sex comes easy but commitment doesn't. So this might just be projection from them. Person freezing to death in the arctic says "I'm freezing to death." Camper next to them with a campfire says, "Hey, I have warmth, but I'm still starving, it's no better over here."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 07:41 PM
15

A lot of feminists seem to think that Incels are like self styled "nice guys" who complain about being "friendzoned" when they usually have more consequential issues Complaints about being "friendzoned" shouldn't be underestimated either. It is very often misunderstood what this means. Here's the gist of it: Generally, whether a woman is attracted to a man is made immutable after a few meetings. Not immediately, but quickly. If one does not build attraction during this window, then building attr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 07:28 PM
11

whose opinions count for nothing? If only that were true. Their words often have enough power to cause ostracisation, or even actual punishments if the person is in HR or a school admin or such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 07:16 PM
29

You appear to be conflating incel and MGTOW, judging by the "voluntarily taking themselves out of the dating market" Though there is much overlap, they are separate groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 06:54 AM
20

Prim reaper has made some very good points on a sex strike in the following video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djYMrxeyTRk
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:20 PM
–

https://supportgroup.1in6.org/ It's neither UK based, nor video call based however.
/r/MenSupportMen13/07/22 03:15 PM
18

Dump her. She deserves far less than the privilege of being with you Probably a bad idea. Here's a quote from the post. She also tells me to be "wary of the female rage".
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:42 PM
5

If it's so much easier for women to get jobs, why do most women work low paying jobs? Excellent question. Though the ease of entering a higher paying job DOES mitigate the gap somewhat, there is an incredibly large gap in what people WANT to do. Society places much more pressure on men to be high earners than it does on women, so it makes sense that women will on average, place more emphasis on comfortable work over high paying work.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:57 PM
5

There is no 'nice guy syndrome' I'd say there is one, and I'll give an example of this same syndrome but applied to a completely different group. So, let's look at what the nice guy syndrome entails: 1) There is a problem that many people are suffering from and it is often talked about. 2) A solution that will eliminate or significantly mitigate the problem is developed. 3) While the solution is primarially to the benefit of the one who takes it, others will benefit from it too. 4) There are tho…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:45 AM
1

That's a nonsense thought experiment, because it would be easy to just give everyone the right to free college. We live in a place called reality, where sadly, there are people with ill motives in politics that will block things that SHOULD be common sense, and sometimes we need to decide if we help noone or help only one group. Both choices are reasonable. Be fair, or maximize benefits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 04:59 PM
-1

Here's a related question. Suppose there's a new state in the US, and you're the governor. And congress has passed it's first bill. And it's up to you to sign or veto it. You can't alter it, there's no more bills coming to be signed. And the bill is quite simply "It is now illegal to murder white people." Do you pass it? Is it preferable to grant protection to only one race vs not granting the protection to any race?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 02:55 AM
10

So: For Incels: No that would not work. The concept of incels comes about because of there being an effective imbalance between the number of men and women in the dating market. There are a variety of causes, from more men being polygamous than women, there being more medications that negatively impact libido prescribed to women, and others. Telling an incel to just act like a man is like telling hungry people to "just act like you're fed" when there's a food shortage. For neckbeards: Often, the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 05:24 PM
39

I disagree. They wouldn't be as organized without the internet. They might not have been given an identifiable name without the internet. But the phenomenon would still exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 05:15 PM
2

Humans are just a bag of proteins, water and hormones in a very specific arangement. It is foolish to think we are something else, and we must recognize that being made of such physical elements, leaves us susceptible to changes, perhaps even fundamental ones by adding chemicals/hormones/proteins at specific times/places.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/22 03:19 PM
12

The solution of course, is to stop pushing gender roles on men. That's one important step. But not the first one. The first one is to stop rewarding these gender roles for men. Dark triad traits correlate positively with a man being able to find a partner. Most people I've met that have been loudly labled as 'misogynist' are QUITE angry at the fact that douchebags are entering relationships, and they aren't, and that they are treated as lesser for wanting to be in a relationship, as though seeki…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 06:32 PM
8

This is a clear dogwhistle.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 06:29 PM
5

Because there's more to it than just being "more variable" It's: More variable + ignore beyond a cutoff threshold = disproportionate increase in average compared to a less variable group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/22 12:36 AM
9

Here's an example: The idea of there being male privilege. NOTE: the word "mean" here is used in the statistical sense. Not in the nice vs mean sense. I'd say that the mean amount of privilege between genders is about even in the US, if you count EVERYONE of that gender. BUT... if you exclude all homeless people, of which there are far more homeless men than women, it will suddenly appear that the mean privilege of men is higher than the mean privilege of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/22 10:20 PM
9

Easy solution to fix this whole thing: I for one, DO believe feminism's current claims DO depend on a sub-variant of the apex fallacy, which I call "Non-Nadir fallacy". You now have a Reddit post declaring such! Huzzah! Non-Nadir fallacy is when taking two groups, with the same average (median and mean average), but different distributions, and then applying the same cutoff formula to both, making the cutoff groups to have DIFFERENT averages, and then acting as though the original groups had dif…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/22 06:45 PM
2

has declared that she will end trans homelessness by 2024 How awful. And not just because it's discriminatory towards men. Being homeless and exposed to the elements is dangerous, and a serious hazard to one's physical health. So much so, that I'd say that being forced to live as a gender one is not, is a LESSER impact on one's health than homelessness. Given such: saying you will end homelessness for the trans population, means that cis homeless people will be encouraged to intentionally misgen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/22 12:51 PM
1

Part of the claim was that Amber Herd and her friends got their stories straightened out and trashed the place. They obviously didn't get their stories straight, judging by testimony. Ergo.... the statement was false? At least that's my theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/22 06:28 AM
5

but 2014 had been an exceptionally bad year for gaming, and journalists had done a terrible job of protecting people from broken games, Here's an example of what gamers were angry about at that point in time: Mass Effect 3 released, and it has multiple endings depending on your choices throughout the game. Except the variation between the three endings is essentially "what color energy blast destroys the universe's warp portals." Game review sites didn't mention this detail. And this infuriated …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 04:30 PM
6

I think maybe there are some benefits to being white. Not being lactose intolerant is pretty nice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 04:51 AM
12

There is a physical limit to the amount of people you can personally give a fuck about. This is called Dunbar's number, and it's absolutely pivotal for understanding interactions between people in an academic sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 11:44 PM
3

I'm not just saying there's some with less options. I'm saying there's a significant number of men with NO options. Where no matter HOW much they drop their standards, they will not be able to successfully enter a relationship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/22 03:51 PM
22

I also believe men have agency when it comes to choosing their partners For a not insignificant number of men, they don't have said agency. Because they never have a choice in partner, forever doomed to loneliness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 02:11 AM
3

Boring is completly subjective It might be subjective, but the consensus DOES tend to clump highly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 03:25 PM
2

That man may have 100 children, but unless he somehow parasitizes the efforts of an entire kingdom, those children will not individually have the same chances of having grandchildren themselves as 2 to 8 or so raised by the dedicated efforts of 20 or so parents in a pair bond; And here we get into a new evolutionary strategy: Get another male to raise your offspring. How often do men nowadays learn that their child isn't biologically their child, well into the child's development?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 03:13 PM
9

I see a similar thing that's not identical, which I call the non-nadir fallacy. Sometimes the line between them is blurry. Apex Fallacy is to generalize based on either prominent members, or the best off members. Non-nadir is to exclude all below a certain value of BOTH groups, which will make two groups of equal average appear unaverage, should they not have identical standard deviations. Let me give you an example. Suppose there are two groups of people, who select a number through rolling a d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/22 08:43 PM
2

It might be your uhh... 'fragrance'. Poor hygiene and overuse of cologne/perfumes is part of the first impression when you meet in person. But if the first impression is over a dating site, until we develop "Scent over HTTP" won't carry such info.
/r/seduction19/05/22 08:05 PM
24

You are comparing a specific type of FGM to the most common form of MGM. There ARE other kinds of MGM that are worse than circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 09:15 PM
3

I believe not, but have a specific underlying cause to point to. Female hormonal birth control on average lowers libido. With how many women use such birth control methods, it leads to a notable difference in average libido between genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 10:43 PM
2

I've said before: If there is no way for someone to ask you out and be respectful... then you will only be asked out by disrespectful people.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:29 PM
1

I'm having a tough time understanding your comment. When you say "These guys", who do you mean?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/22 01:26 PM
3

I doubt there's any state that would allow a father to relinquish a child. Delaware does. Hell, you don't even need to be a parent or guardian to use it in Delaware. I think there's a case where someone stole a car, realized an infant was in the backseat, and dropped the child off at a police station.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:31 PM
1

You seem to not understand the comparison I was making. I wasn't likening the anti-vaxxers to incels. I was likening the way society was treating anti-vaxxers to how incels treat women. Society gives people the opportunity for a vaccine, which will primarially benefit the person being vaccinated, but also provide a benefit to society by increasing herd immunity. And to those who spurn the vaccine, communities have sprung up making fun of them and taking glee in them getting their comeuppance. A …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 08:40 PM
9

Small nitpick: It's actually about the same difficulty to prevent ovulation and sperm production. The problem is stopping sperm production without also preventing erections.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:32 AM
4

I applaud you doing this. But it will be a hard road forward, and there will be unfortunate consequences. I'd say that a lot of men think like you, and want the same things. Unfortunately, for heterosexual men, doing those things often correlates poorly with success in the dating market. Are there women that like men who do such things? Yes. However, there's way less women like that, then men who enjoy doing those things. And so, a lot of men have to make the decision: Probably be alone and ques…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 07:57 PM
3

I have imagined that. And my answer is: The groups transphobia will likely cause them to treat transmen as women. And thus, treat them kindly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/22 03:19 AM
5

Exactly. How many times on this subreddit has it been brought up that men can be raped despite being stronger than the average woman, and how we plead for society to recognize that rape can occur even by someone physically weaker than the victim. Yet look at this. When I propose the same, I get nearly two hundred downvotes.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 03:28 AM
2

I'm not a giant myself I'm like 168cm but height had zero to no effect in my life. What makes you say that? Do you have access to an alternate reality where you were a different height to be able to compare? Or are you merely stating that there has been no discrimination towards you that explicitly mentioned it was about your height.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/22 07:38 PM
-12

And how exactly does the 12 year old have a gun? You can’t even own a gun as a 12 year old in America. It could very well belong to the 12 year old's parent, or perhaps the 17 year old's parent.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 06:25 PM
-76

Fair. I'm not defending the claim that the boy is the father. I'm merely saying that it is plausible that a 12 year old could rape a 17 year old, especially if guns are involved.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 06:17 PM
-208

If the 12 year old has a gun, it's believable. Remember how often rape claims against women are dismissed because "the weaker one couldn't possibly rape"? That's what you're doing right now.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 02:59 PM
1

Or perhaps the gun wasn't concealed carry, but rather FOUND by the perpetrator at the victim's house? And gun laws don't magically prevent all instances of gun violence. They might reduce them, and I am in favor of them, but pretending they're 100% foolproof is bad.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:09 PM
5

Indeed. An 11 year old could conceivably have a gun. Right now we have no details, and I'm willing to give the court the benefit of the doubt right now.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 02:17 PM
2

Well, I would LIKE to block them. But unfortunately, "block" on Reddit is far more than just a "block", to the point that I feel it is immoral to use it under most circumstances, given how much it can silence others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/22 06:35 PM
3

Speaking of relations between COVID-19 and Incels, there's another link I've seen that's a bit harder to see. A parallel between how some incels treat women, and how many vaccinated people treat antivaxxers. Early on after vaccines were distributed, there was a fair bit of understanding towards those hesitant about the vaccine. Then subs like /r/HermanCainAward came up, to practically celebrate anti-vaccers getting their comeuppance. Now let's look at something that happens with Incels. One of t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 02:50 PM
26

It's aggravating to watch someone tell people that they're a bad person, or somehow flawed for wanting companionship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/22 07:21 PM
36

I clicked on a random thread, looked at the top comment. I want you to ask yourself that honestly. Will not being in a relationship for the foreseeable future, break you as a person? If the answer to that question is yes, then there is a very high chance that the need for relationship is a symptom of some other, deeper rooted issue in your mind. Huh. If that's the top comment, then the community likely believes in telling people "Hey, you know that whole pyramid of needs thing. You're a broken p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/22 05:58 PM
1

Claim you're gay, join the queer group. Then go on and on about how the company has "forced me to try to hide my true sexuality in order to be able to properly socialize. They create cliques for many people, but seemingly intentionally excluded me from being in any of them. Unless I hid my sexuality and lied about it. Anyway, I'm actually straight."
/r/MensRights05/04/22 06:49 AM
5

It may have been this post, as it had a recent sudden burst in popularity. https://skaldish.tumblr.com/post/680088272285941761/absolutely-because-its-an-extremely-sticky
/r/MensRights02/04/22 06:49 AM
5

Let's see. Astronauts: This is a REALLY interesting question. There are numerous differences between males and females. They also exist in things that are irrelevant for most people, like resistance to ionizing radiation, O2 usage, etc... Given how expensive it is to put things into space ($10,000 a pound or so), a tiny difference here could literally be over a dozen people's life savings in a third world nation. As far as whether men or women are advantaged here: I legitimately don't know which…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/22 01:47 PM
3

Can you clarify this statement? Are you saying men are generally less inclined to remain faithful to their partners? My claim is not "less inclined". My claim is "more often". But yes, you have the general idea. [[cucking is]] not an insult What are you talking about? It's quite often used as an insult.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/22 12:27 AM
5

The patriarchy is the reason toxic masculinity exists, there’s the social pressure or learned behavior to exert your masculinity over others. Not in my experience. Exibiting traits of toxic masculinity actually correlate positively with men being able to enter a heterosexual relationship. So... that right there is a BIG reason why toxic masculinity is so prevelant, that has nothing to do with a conspiracy of men to promote other men.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:22 PM
7

do you think anxiety about women, as with loveshy theory, is a primary factor in creating "perpetually single" men? No. It is a primary factor in determining WHICH men become perpetually single. If somehow a wizard waves a wand and removes that factor, then some other man will fall down to take his place. As far as what causes it, it's a dating market that has different effective numbers of male and female participants. Women tend to take longer breaks after relationships. Hormonal birth control…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/22 07:16 AM
3

There's another part to this. The Michelangelo statue is not flammable. ??? we still have a fire suppression system around it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 03:44 PM
6

Diamond's have an ignition temperature somewhere around 1500F. It's gonna be PRETTY hard to use diamonds as a fuel source, even if you have an abundance of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 03:42 PM
1

As far as burns relating to feminism, I'm not saying there is any. I was simply trying to think of some sort of malady that is USUALLY from the same source, (in this case fire), but there are a few other ways of getting them that are uncommon (such as acid). Burns is the first thing that came to mind. There is nothing deeper to that, no hidden metaphor, etc... As far as what feminism is to me: The political movement that either attempts to, or pretends to attempt to improve conditions for women,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 02:01 PM
7

Trying to help men's rights without trying to fight feminism, is like trying to prevent burns without teaching fire safety. Yes, there are a few burns that don't involve fire. The vast majority do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 10:18 AM
1

If you go against gender norms, you need to be against all of them otherwise you will just create new problems. https://xkcd.com/592/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 07:18 PM
10

I think this might be a bastardization of: "There will be radical effects towards doubling the workforce size without similar reductions in hours worked. Increasing the number of workers inherently shifts power from the workers to the employers."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 07:17 PM
4

If someone is sat at home all day when you’re working, you can’t relate to them. Chores at home are significant work. Honestly, I could probably relate MORE to someone who spends significant amounts of time doing household chores, than I could someone in a field I have little understanding of. I know some stuff about cleaning/cooking/house maintainance, and can understand those things. I have no fucking clue what goes into oh say, a quality control engineer at a plywood factory. it alleviates so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 07:15 PM
2

To be fair, my experience with non disposable razors is: "As soon as you get comfortable with this type, we make a new razor with no actual differences, and the new razor heads are incompatible, oh and we're jacking up the price on the old style of heads."
/r/MensRights09/03/22 02:13 PM
1

“Women can tell when you’re being fake” That has the same energy as: "Camouflage doesn't work. Every person I've seen wearing it was spotted by me." When something's purpose is at least partially to hide it's own existence, then the fact that all the times it has been apparent, is times that it's own stealth failed, is irrelevant, as the times it succeeded would not be recorded.
/r/seduction08/03/22 12:23 AM
6

So how active is the sub? It's private so, I can't see anything there, or even tell if it's used at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 04:10 AM
2

There's a bit of argument if BOTH participants are under duress from a third party. But that's clearly not what's happening here.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 01:04 AM
1

If a woman says she’ll “blow” the guy, then decides she doesn’t want to and just rides him, is she a “rapist”? If the man consents to one sexual activity, and a different one is performed, then yes. The man was raped, and the woman is a rapist.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 12:57 AM
1

I don't see anything wrong with focusing on self-identified incels. Focusing on them is fine. Exclusive research without a control group however, is unscientific.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 05:43 PM
2

I’m tired of the term incel being thrown around this men rights subreddit or MGTOW or red pill. Indeed. It's especially puzzling regarding MGTOW, as incel is mutually exclusive with MGTOW. If an incel is the inability to have sex despite wanting it, then a culture devoted to spurning sexual advances is fundamentally incompatible.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 05:42 PM
12

So, prior to Betsy Devos's title IX changes, there were mandated standards of evidence, and cross examination rules, etc.... for hearings regarding sexual assault. So because of this, in many colleges, there were two drastically different sets of rules for expulsion hearings depending on whether or not it was a sexual offense. It's kinda silly that if someone is accused of punching another student in the face, that they could bring up evidence about previous accusations by the accuser that were …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/22 07:49 PM
2

Necromythos posted: Those women/girls aren't feminists, and then was responded to with Spare us the "they are not feminists" excuse . Detailed information about how feminists do bad things. Given that the first post in the thread referred to both the administrators AND the students, I felt it appropriate to specify that the only enumerated misconduct was by the administrators/teachers, not the students. We need to be precise about who we are angry at.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 06:03 PM
0

I think you are over-estimating relevance of PUA culture. I think it is incredibly relevant when it is the group that first used the term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/22 05:38 PM
0

at least 20 years. The meaning I gave was the primary meaning around eight years ago. I think you are drastically underestimating how fast the landscape changes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/22 04:57 PM
7

At the end up the day, “friend-zoned” is just a turn of phrase for “unrequited love” or unrequited feelings. Nobody wants that, period. No, it's a bit more specific than that. Or at least the original meaning was more specific. It's arguable that it has since lost that specificity. One of the concepts of pickup artistry (I am specifically neither agreeing nor disagreeing with this, merely stating that it is or was a commonly held belief) is that whether or not a woman is attracted to a man, whet…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/22 06:36 AM
2

To be fair, it's the teachers/administration that blocked the petition and suspended the students, not the feminist students.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:27 AM
9

What state is your friend living in, and employed in (If different from where they live)? In MOST states, political stances is NOT a protected class, sadly. It's perfectly legal for employers in most states to fire you for espousing specific political views. Now, it's illegal to discipline someone for voting a specific way, but not just stating political beliefs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/22 03:10 PM
1

Not nearly as badly as FF 13. There's no ability to backtrack to old areas (except at the end of the game), most dungeons are LITERALLY linearly shaped.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 06:02 PM
1

True. I'm talking about the original FF 13, not it's sequels (or it's arguable prequel, Type-0)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 05:58 PM
2

Yup. Hallway simulator 13. Each of the six party members have roughly equal character development, screentime and focus. Ever hear the phrase "don't judge a book by it's cover?" Now, a later game in the universe, Lightning returns DOES focus around that character. But not the original FF 13.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/22 10:53 PM
2

I'd say that 13 and 7's approach are vastly different. In FF7, you're playing as cloud 90% of the time. In FF 13, each of the main cast get relatively equal screentime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/22 06:55 PM
1

(Even though the previous single player RPG so not 14 was lead by a woman) To be fair, the main cast of 13 was 3 men and 3 women. An even gender split.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/22 06:44 PM
5

I agree that double standards are bad. To this point, I say the following. Dear heterosexual women: Be advised that body count of a man is a strong predictor of future sexual infidelity, and I suggest you act accordingly, if you wish for a monogamous relationship.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 07:09 PM
2

Eh, talking about discrimination in jobs surrounding web development on a subreddit meant to talk about web development isn't THAT far out there.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:17 PM
36

So, in her defense, in Japanese, the word 人権 (jinken) can mean EITHER "human rights", or "items required to play the game". So it sounds more like she was saying men under 170 cm shouldn't be allowed to play a video game. Still bad, but not AS bad. Source: https://kakuchopurei.com/2022/02/17/female-tekken-7-pro-tanukana-makes-joke-about-short-men-gets-fired/
/r/MensRights17/02/22 08:58 PM
2

Honestly, yes, men and women are treated differently in the body positivity movement. However, I think the movement overall is bad. Some people are considered 'ugly' to most people. And let's face it. 'Ugly' is just a term for 'extremely unattractive'. Body positivity is basically trying to shame people for what they find ugly. Shaming someone for what they do/don't find attractive is awful. It's no different than homophobia in my eyes. If someone thinks "I don't find fat people attractive", the…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 08:51 PM
9

Incorrect. IT's actually a HUGE pain for anyone who transitions to male over the age of 27, as they're now a man who has NOT registered for selective service, and MOST systems are not equipped to handle that.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 11:02 PM
11

Also don’t forget how the vast majority of women here on Reddit absolutely lose their fucking minds whenever you refer to them as “female” instead of “woman” or “women” (claiming that its inherently sexist). The absolutely infuriating part of that: Significant effort was spent by the LGBTQ+ community to teach the difference between sex and gender, indicating how woman and female have different definitions. Then, when people are yelled at for using one instead of the other, they're acting like th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 12:11 PM
1

historically intellect has been seen as a necessity to govern correctly (which was seen as a man's job). I mean, post 1600, maybe. Before that, it was lineage mostly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 07:40 PM
9

An unexpected result might be that females become less receptive to mating. Just saying. It might explain some aspects of feminism. While this is probably true, I'd wager that this is a drop in the bucket compared to the effects of birth control, a similar chemical, which is taken in higher doses than the accidental pollution ingestment.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 08:14 PM
14

Hmm, I'm seeing quite often there being a claim that is false about us, then a deleted reply, and a reply to said deleted reply that's from a mod that simply says "We don't allow direct links to that sub here." Sounds like whenever someone provides evidence to defend us, the evidence is removed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 06:02 AM
30

A court with less protections for the accused, that is only applicable to men DOES count as a men's issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 02:52 PM
0

Do not condemn someone to risk merely because of the actions of their parents.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 08:13 PM
26

It’s literally socially acceptable for the President to announce that he will discriminate against anyone who isn’t a black woman to be the Supreme Court Justice nominee Not just that... But also make the justices LESS racially representative of America. 14% of Americans are black. 11% of SCOTUS justices are black. If another is added, that's 22%. 11% is closer to 14% than 22% is to 14%.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 06:28 PM
5

This is actually a relevant point, things do become self levelling. The pendulum at the moment has swung too far, it will come back to center though if only because women suddenly find out they don't like making the first move. I agree that the metaphorical pendulum has swung too far, and will change the direction it's swinging. I disagree that it will start swinging back to where it was, and believe it may instead go in a different direction: (I am not certain if it will or will not) The questi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 02:32 PM
3

If someone asks you again, and again, and again, and again until you FINALLY say yes, that's not consent. If the person is free to leave the situation, then your situation doesn't really hold. If they're NOT free to leave the situation, then it's borderline kidnapping. This whole "They asked me too many times, so I magically lost the ability to think for myself" is bullshit. If someone says they assented, but the assent is not consent: I ask the following. "What reason do we have to overrule you…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:35 AM
1

I have. The guy fit just about every stereotype of a homosexual man that exists in the US. And... impregnated my girlfriend. So... yeah.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 11:40 AM
-3

With regards to a rape exception: That would literally be creating a financial incentive to falsely accuse someone of rape. I'm against false accusations of rape, period, I don't care who they are against. Now, I'd be fine with an exception for statutory rape. As declaring the boy to be the father, inherently means that the mother raped the father. The only way I can see that NOT being true, is if the father raped the mother.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 06:54 PM
-1

Leave lesbians out of it. I don't care WHAT someone's sexual orientation is, it is irrelevant to their viewpoints.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 03:44 PM
2

I don't speak the language English version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPOLAnnPE5o
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:11 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPOLAnnPE5o English version.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 10:11 AM
2

Which part are you claiming is untrue? They also said 'men don't have to worry about being stalked' Or there are different kinds of stalking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 03:02 PM
-1

Clarifying that there is a difference between "possible for individuals" and "Possible for everyone simultaneously" is an important facet to this conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 02:49 PM
7

Ahh dating apps. There's another facet to this discussion that's rarely brought up. The INTENTIONAL DESIGN to make most men be unsuccessful. Take a look at how OKCupid has changed over the years. They used to have all sorts of blogposts about how they are helping people enter relationships, and to show several surprising statistics. Now... they've removed so many features, that they practically don't work anymore for finding relationships. It's now practically a Tinder clone. A man who finds a r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 01:14 PM
3

Indeed. I've described how historically, wars have shifted the gender ratio, to alter the dating landscape, which lead to some beneficial outcomes. I was then treated like I was advocating for going to war to fix dating issues. No, I was merely stating why things weren't as bad historically, and why resetting OTHER things that have changed would not have the desired outcome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 01:02 PM
2

PUA = pickup artist. They're people, generally men, who study and/or research how to most efficiently court and bed people of the preferred gender(s). TRP = The Red Pill. They're a group of the manosphere. It's hard to explain what they are without also explaining MGTOW (Men going their own way) and MRA (Men's Rights Activist) Here's how I usually explain it. Imagine there is a tabletop game, or an MMO, or whatever, and there's talk about class XYZ being too weak. MRAs would be the ones proposin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 12:59 PM
13

I'd love a general consensus approach to about how much and how soon it is okay to ask for a number, socially acceptable ways to practice this without being problematic, etc. I'd hate that. It'd be awful, and backfire terribly. Every time I've seen 'rules about flirting/asking women out', the same damn thing happens. Attractive men break the rules and are rewarded with a relationship. Unattractive men are punished for breaking the rules. This means it's just rules that ugly people, and people wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/22 12:53 PM
1

The reasons for banning DNA testing except court ordered has more to do with medical data security and protection from discrimination by companies like insurances than it has to do with paternity. And the reason America threw Japanese people in camps during WW2 was for their own protection.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:34 PM
1

if we're taking the position that people can't be counseled out of homosexuality From my understanding, conversion therapy is far more effective (Though still unlikely to work, just not AS unlikely) if the person going through the process does so of their own free will without outside pressures. It's immoral to try to force someone to change their sexuality, or even encourage them to change it. (Encouraging people to explore it and discover it is NOT immoral). However, for the extreme cases, suc…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:22 PM
3

Do you think that this is discrimination and not biological instincts? Just because something is instinctual, does not mean it is non discriminatory. However, I do not have an answer to your question.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:14 AM
9

So, Let me preface this by saying: I will never shame someone for what they are attracted to. That is not a choice a person has. In some very limited circumstances, I might shame/judge them for ACTING on it, such as pedophilia. This is not a criticism of what she is attracted to, or disattracted to, merely commentary on the ramifications thereof. Bravo to this woman for being cognizant of it, and realizing things about herself from an external lens. That is a difficult thing to do. I predict thi…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 08:12 AM
5

Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were “made to penetrate” someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. This doesn't imply though that 79% of men who were raped had a female perpetrator though. Rape for men does not only include made to penetrate, but also being penetrated. Most of the rapes that are referenced by prison rape jokes, are not made to penetrate, but rather forced penetration, for example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 04:40 PM
3

The rise of incels does not increase the downward trend. There might be a correlation, but it's not causation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 10:05 PM
10

Here is what I have heard argued from some of the right. Historically, inceldom was less of an issue. Historically, there were greater restrictions on relationships. We should go back to those restrictions to lessen the impact of incels. The problem is... Those restrictions' removal aren't what caused incels. It's a bit darker than that. Men are more likely to die young due to deaths at work than women. Historically, this gap was even bigger. This caused the dating market to skew, so that there …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 03:25 PM
12

Additionally, a rise incels increases the downwards trend of birth rates I question this point. Most, if not all incels are men. Men generally aren't the bottleneck in human reproduction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 03:19 PM
1

And honestly, if catcalling is really a mostly homeless phenomenon (I've witnessed it once in my adult life so I wouldn't know) it's not a women's right problem, it's a homelessness problem. This does not follow logically. It might be correct, and I am explicitly not saying it's incorrect, I'm just saying your chain of logic does not hold. Correlation and causation, and all that. Let's suppose there IS a correlation between homelessness and catcalling. That means that at least one of THREE thing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 11:12 PM
4

Every one of those women is going to remember it for the rest of their lives. I challenge this. With how common many feminist subreddits proport catcalling to be, would any specific instance be memorable, barring the exceptional cases?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 11:03 PM
2

"The golden rule is a terrible adage when the world is filled with both the drowning and the desiccated."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 11:00 PM
11

No, I don't think this will work. And it will indeed backfire. But the backfiring MIGHT bring some issues to the limelight. So it might be worth it in the end. Basically, what will end up happening, is that without punishing men who ARE SUCCESSFUL in starting a relationship, yet violated the rules in the beginning, the whole thing will collapse. I do not know how we can effectively perform such a punishment. You see, what will inevitably happen, is 'attractive' (I use the word loosely to mean no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 10:59 PM
1

Though the subreddit is named "Men's rights", it will deal with all sorts of issues that are faced by men, or by males. One major issue is that men who are unsuccessful sexually, are often viewed as a worse person, or even a danger. This post is one calling attention to that issue, and bringing in data about just how bad it is, in that roughly 1/3 of the people who voted said that it's impossible for a man who wants to have intercourse, but is unable to find a willing partner, to be well adjuste…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:45 PM
3

Is there anyone without sexual preferences of any sort, who finds all humans equally sexually attractive? I would be concerned if so, as that would include underaged children.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:19 PM
3

Refusing to date your own gender is not homophobic First off, that's not the comparison I made. I stated more along the lines of "Refusing to date the opposite gender is not sexist" And I agree with that. People are allowed to refuse to date ANYONE for ANY reason, and we should not judge them for it.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:19 PM
16

While this is a real concern: Calling someone homophobic for their desired partner traits, is like calling a gay man sexist because he won't sleep with a woman.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 12:13 PM
7

Surely women have every right to be as selective as they want? Something someone said to me once. "Loneliness is the reward for the hubris of standards." The problem is it's not just the person with unreasonable standards that loneliness is inflicted on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/21 05:27 PM
1

Do men make divorces as brutal as possible for other men? Excellent question. Possibly. Aren't most judges male?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 07:39 PM
2

One of the biggest predictors of if a woman will be abused in that relationship, is if the woman has been abused in previous relationships. So obviously there's SOMETHING that some women do that cause them to be more likely to be abused. Should we ignore this struggle that women face because of that?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 07:38 PM
9

so this obviously only becomes something that could be a factor after you’re looking at the other person naked or at the very least discussing being naked. Or after having spoken with someone else who saw the guy naked.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 02:17 PM
5

Indeed. Any time you are considering something involving money, you need to think about how a malicious person might use it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 02:21 PM
16

There's another problem with allowing paper abortion to exist for only victims of rape. It literally gives a financial incentive to accuse someone else of rape. That means TWO things. One, it will encourage false accusations. Two, it will make prosecution harder. Imagine the defense attorney saying "Mr. Victim, is it true that by accusing Mrs. Perpetrator of raping you, you no longer have to pay $6,000 a year in child support, and that over the course of eighteen years, you would save $108,000? …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 06:11 AM
28

the mod team there thinks that men consenting to have sex is equivalent to consenting to having kids. Friendly reminder that men who are raped are still liable for child support, so this point doesn't matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 04:55 AM
4

We are trying to encourage men to become educators by working to remove/lessen the barriers to entry, specifically by removing the pedophilic stigma. I believe this is much more effective than just telling people "Go do it, be diverse". We actually work to remove the barriers they face.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 03:24 PM
14

Nearly every time I've asked a woman out, I've been rejected, and they have within 2 months entered a relationship with a known abuser, and have gotten abused in said relationship. It hurts to see it happen. Someone you gathered your courage to ask out, only to effectively tell you that they'd rather go out with someone who raped their fiance. And then you bear witness to that same person you care about enough to want to try to become even closer to, to be beaten, or worse. A terrible thing happ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 09:57 PM
13

It was also revealed that Jackson enjoyed When both the accused and the victim are named Jackson, this is unclear and really could be phrased better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 04:16 PM
7

Another thing to note: In some states, like Georgia, the father CANNOT use this option (according to the letter of the law), even if the mother and father are married, and the mother dies during childbirth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 03:57 AM
5

No, what you DID say is an implicit assumption that the right is purely filled with " people who want to criminalize various aspects of human existence", as opposed to there being a wide range of views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 01:19 PM
11

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Disagree with the left on some small point, such as whether or not puberty suppressants should be allowed, and you're seen the same as someone who wants to literally behead transgender people in the street.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 04:06 AM
13

Since we have a two party system, not really. In America, you have three choices at the voting booth. Vote Democrat, Vote Republican, or have your voice be ignored. And the left, ESPECIALLY among it's younger members has a serious problem with pushing anyone out that's even slightly out of party scope. Think that perhaps puberty suppressant drugs shouldn't be given to children who ask for it, but are otherwise okay with everything in the transgender community? You've got a massive group coming o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 03:30 AM
2

It was one of my browser extensions blocking it. My bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/21 02:25 AM
3

Your first link seems to go to a broken Japanese webpage. Could you fix that link? I've long suspected it, but had no evidence to back it up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 05:10 PM
39

the whole "if men could get pregnant..." thing Indeed. My response to that is "If cutting off parts of infant genitals was a thing, we'd protect boys and let it happen to girls.... wait a minute."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 04:30 PM
25

Her: ... Don't you care at all for how safe I feel?!? No. I care about how safe you are. Much in the same way I feel about a hypothetical person who states they feel unsafe around people of a specific race. what if you live in an extremely high crime area? Does that not make guardedness more justifiable, even if it makes men feel like they are seen as monsters? Guardedness is fine. Discriminatory guardedness is not. In this age, if someone has a gun hidden on them, they could end your life easil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 01:57 PM
2

It is true that in the US, the defendant has the option to waive their right to a jury trial, opting instead for a bench trial. (I am uncertain however, if it is possible for the trial to be jury anyway, despite waiving the right to a jury trial, but I have never heard of such). However, I would not say that it is "often" exercised. I believe it is about 10% of cases federally that go to trial are bench trials.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 06:12 PM
3

I'm not sure I understand. As per your statement earlier The principles of these laws have to be ironclad, unchangeable and evenly enforced. That is the government exercising control over it's citizens. It is INCREDIBLY difficult to do this fairly and evenly. What I proposed instead requires that the government stick to it's own rules about governing, preventing things such as emoluments, and electability of insurrectionists. This is also difficult, but not AS difficult as exercising control ove…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 03:23 PM
3

No political system allowing direct attacks on its fundamentals can survive. First off, I do not believe this is true. In the US, it's kinda working. Admittedly it's pretty rocky right now, but that's due to internal rules not being enforced, such as how at LEAST a third of congress should be barred from running under the fourteenth amendment. Second: No political system who's fundamentals are not allowed to be scrutinized should be allowed to survive. Now, I admit, this IS a tricky thing to do,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 02:42 PM
14

We're just not willing to stand idly again as evil spreads. I can say the same. One of the first things Hitler did to maintain his power, is forbid people from speaking ill of his regime. And I will not stand idly by when someone, left OR right does the same thing. A government beyond reproach is an abomination. Hate speech laws are a way to mask laws that create such a government.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 12:38 PM
16

So, without actually being able to see the alleged hate speech, I cannot make a proper judgement over whether or not what was said was indeed hate speech. HOWEVER: two things stand out to me. 1) Hate speech is illegal. Grr, shouldn't be. It is important that we can speak our mind, and raise objections to those in power, else the government will become oppressive. 2) Jury trials are rare. Grr, juries are supposed to be a check on governmental overreach. They should be at the very minimum required…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 12:20 PM
8

If the man gets sole custody of the child they get child support. They MIGHT get child support. (Read: there's a miniscule chance they'll get child support.)
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:10 PM
11

Here's my response: Okay, let's ignore the ability for a woman to have an abortion. In MOST states, the mother is able to unilaterally drop a newborn off for adoption, no questions asked, and they are absolved of all financial responsibility. The father does NOT have this right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 01:53 AM
7

Proven rapes, unsubstantiated claims, and false accusations. I'd delineate it into four. Change 'false accusation', into "Mistaken accusation", and "Baseless accusation." Suppose a woman was raped by John Smith. And the woman accuses Jake Smith, John's identical twin. That's a MUCH different circumstance than an entirely baseless accusation, and needs to be addressed in a very different manner.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:14 PM
32

The suggestion is to say that BOTH are equally sexist, so if one is forbidden, then both logically should be. To force the discussion about why one is unacceptable, and THEN force the discussion about why the same points should not apply to the other.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:11 PM
1

Dude, you're worrying about nothing. This story is BULLSHIT. You can't actually buy a PS5 now. They're out of stock everywhere.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 05:23 PM
5

The word used here is "baseless", which is a bit more than just false. If someone was accused of rape, when in reality it was their identical twin that raped, that wouldn't be "baseless". It's still false, but not baseless.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:36 PM
5

And it's not exactly recent either. "Banned 5 months ago."
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:31 PM
10

All it takes is 'deciding' that the man's motions were threatening, and that it actually was duress.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:49 PM
2

Thank you for the clarification. Unfortunately, I do not know anything about Alberta Health Services, so I can provide no guidance.
/r/MenSupportMen09/09/21 01:44 PM
6

You're gonna have to fill me in on what that acronym means. Because to me ahs means the subreddit "Against hate subreddits", which is known for trying to get 'hateful' subreddits down through any means needed, including posting child pornography to the 'hateful' subreddit.
/r/MenSupportMen09/09/21 01:24 PM
-1

I'd say that it's pretty hard to distinguish, due to possible chilling effects. I'd imagine that a lot of 'incels' agree with 'incel culture', but actively pretend to NOT agree with it, simply because they see how hard people who believe in 'incel culture' are attacked.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:28 PM
2

Many single mothers are also incels Unless you are referring to women who have adopted a child, and are raising them alone, no. Your statement is self-defeating. Having had a biological child means one is not celibate. (There's some wiggle room in this definition with artificial insemination.)
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:20 PM
0

Unless the parents are citizens, the fetus only becomes American upon birth.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:24 AM
-7

On the scales of justice you must weigh women's bodily autonomy versus a newly created American's right to live. I note you use the word "American". Is an unborn child of non-citizens who are currently in America, an American? No. Citizenship is conferred upon location of birth, OR citizenship of parents.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:33 PM
-1

I have a theory about Bill's divorce. There's some people losing a LOT of money if /r/wallstreetbets is successful, due to holding shorts of GME. If Bill has a lot of GME shorts, and the price SKYROCKETS, he could lose his entire fortune. But... if he conveniently lost half of it in a divorce, and couldn't pay that half, then re-married a week later... oh, looks like everything is peachy, and she still has more money than he can ever use.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 06:50 PM
11

The one who makes less in the marriage receives alimony Close! The one who makes less in the marriage MIGHT receive alimony. Judges just tend to NOT award it to men, even if they make less.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 05:31 PM
4

That’s now how statistics works. Random sampling rules exist for a reason. So you do bring up a good point. 1089 is a sufficient sample size provided that it's random. It's not. It's a self-selecting sample. Those who have been assaulted will be more likely to seek out the survey and fill it out.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:56 PM
3

The main problems surveys has is to have truly random samples with no biases. You're correct. 1089 is a sufficient sample size for this. It's a bit on the low end, but it's not AWFUL. The thing that ruins this study is that it is a self selected sample, as opposed to a random sample.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:54 PM
2

but if it wasn't surpassible, we wouldn't be here. Your logic has a flaw in it. The fact that humans continue to procreate does indeed mean that there are some men are indeed successful. HOWEVER, it does not mean that it is surpassible to any specific individual.
/r/MenSupportMen24/08/21 11:41 PM
2

I have started to change and realized that only boys make excuses, men take responsibility Be careful with this. Own up to things that are your fault. But there are things in life that ARE outside of your control. Don't take the blame for other people's shitty behavior. That's how you get taken advantage of.
/r/MenSupportMen20/08/21 07:02 PM
2

Fair enough. I suppose the hypothetical comment did not specifically tell the person to remain in their current location and remarry.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:27 AM
4

That's not the law violating part. From the law I linked: No person who is afflicted with a venereal disease shall marry in this state.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 12:52 AM
9

and one of the ones that we enforce with extreme prejudice is advocating for illegal acts. Instant ban, and highly unlikely to ever get unbanned. So, if I tell a man in nebraska who caught the clap from his wife's infidelity to divorce her and re-marry, I'll be getting banned instantly? Nebraska Revised Statute 42-102
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:55 PM
1

Because that sub was also banned for misogyny. I find that hard to believe, given the low amount of misogyny on said subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/21 02:20 AM
1

Indeed, there were THREE subreddits banned at the same time. r/MGTOW, r/MGTOW2, and r/misandry. MGTOW2 and MGTOW differed by a self imposed schism. MGTOW2 was far less misogynistic, yet that was not enough. r/Misandry existed to point OUT sexism. Yet all three were removed. It FEELS to me like take the admins wanted to take out one legitimate target so they could take out what they REALLY wanted gone as 'collateral damage'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/21 11:25 PM
1

That sub was rife with misogyny. Then why prohibit discussions of MGTOW2?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/21 11:24 PM
2

As fucked up as the legal system is towards men... This doesn't seem likely. Child support is not issued UNTIL the child is born. If there was an abortion, then there would have been no child. No birth certificate. Being on the hook after being raped is totally a thing for men though.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:36 PM
11

I'm baffled how you can tell someone is going off the deep end from a single utterance of "Why?"
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:46 PM
1

For the first hour I'd just rejoice on the fact that I'll never have to be afraid of being sent to a war against my will again. Interesting that you assume equality would be reached by abolishing the draft, rather than instituting it for everyone.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:53 AM
15

Yeah, the idea of Andrew Yang not being left wing is absolutely baffling to me. He's probably legitimately the furthest left candidate in the 2020 democratic primary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 05:01 PM
11

Don't call the 5'8 guy a creep or a "nice guy" for being a normal, polite human being who just doesn't have the deep voice or the stature that gets you going. I don't think this is the reason behind the "nice guy" phenomenon. Or at least, there's significantly more reasons than just that, and most people have trouble articulating the reason. Dunbar's number Basically, humans can only maintain so many friendships before some naturally just 'fall off'. Attempting to have more friends than one's du…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 03:35 PM
6

4) Why would she feel jealous if she didn't find underage girls attractive? So fair warning: the original post has been deleted, and thus I might be missing context.... I am jealous of how easily some other men can attract women. Doesn't mean I'm attracted to those men. The other three are good points.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:32 PM
2

Any game, where it's feasable to tell someone else "Just walk away from the keyboard, it'll be better for the team", for reasons OTHER than stealth is a bad game.
/r/seduction19/06/21 05:48 PM
13

All I am saying is how is it different from making fun of the dimensions of other people's genitals? Well, genital size generally can't be changed through lifestyle changes. Being fat usually can. So... that's a difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/21 12:03 AM
18

Obviously the 30% who were in contact with law enforcement (meaning a parole officer, the police, or prison) This drastically changes my view of it. You can't say stuff to your PO and be safe. There's no HIPPA. There's no secrecy. Only a person who literally has the authority to have you imprisoned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 05:13 PM
3

The size of the population is almost completely irrelevant when it comes to how accurate a survey is, as long as the sample is truly random.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 03:47 PM
3

Standards are a luxury for those who have options.
/r/seduction11/05/21 07:26 PM
1

Bro I don't know who the fuck is a man and regrets having casual sex. Someone paying child support, or that has an STD.
/r/seduction08/05/21 06:12 AM
3

Honestly, I'm against using that definition. Words mean what they are commonly and usually meant to be. It's absurd when racism is redefined as "power plus prejudice", or whatever definition is convenient to make it so that telling someone they don't qualify due to skin color is fine because they're too pale. It's equally absurd to apply this definition, and use it to rope in people with extreme feminists.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 08:27 PM
20

I think there needs to be better advice for these men than listing dating "do's" and "do nots". Why are we not advocating for these men to be more secure in their decision making? Giving them the tools to determine appropriate and non-appropriate scenarios and act accordingly. I don't think this by itself will work. I've seen men punished for the same behaviors that have started successful relationships between other people. Or in other words, it's only wrong to do these actions if they're unsuc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 07:43 PM
12

So, there's a good chance that this is something else entirely, in an attempt to use divorce fraud to get out of paying debt obligations. Gates has likely shorted GME stock. If the stock price goes up a lot, he could go bankrupt, and lose everything he owns. But, if he lost half of his stuff in a divorce immediately before, that's untouchable. And then he could fall back in love and get married again. When billions of dollars are on the line, there's always a chance that it's for an unintuitive …
/r/MGTOW204/05/21 03:26 AM
10

I wonder why no one talks about the femcels. You know, the ones that get pumped Because that's not an incel. Incels aren't even able to get to that point.
/r/MGTOW230/04/21 07:00 PM
2

Unless you are a professional mma fighter or boxer or something then no you will not break anyone's bones with one punch The punch no. Falling over from the punch, maybe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 06:32 AM
8

Interesting. They make a ruling that effectively threatens people into misgendering themselves. Being homeless is dangerous. You are exposed to the elements, and all sorts of people who wish you ill. Now imagine, you were told women can be taken out of this situation. Well, you're not a woman, you're a cis man. But all you need to do to qualify is to claim you're a woman, and present yourself as one. This is effectively saying "You will be subjected to significant risks and danger unless you mis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/21 07:36 PM
1

Redpill covers more things than just entering relationships. It also covers how to handle interactions to minimize the risk of false accusations.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 02:51 PM
0

I don't trust white women when it comes to BLM. Distrusting because of race/gender is wrong, period. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 07:30 PM
28

Replace "man" in the given scenario with "black". OP is NTA. Hopefully replacing man with black indicates why the woman is in the wrong. She is assuming, just because of an immutable trait, that OP was a bad person.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:14 PM
2

Imagine some town has 1000 women and 1000 men in the 18-25 age-bracket. 700 of the women are dating 700 of the men. An additional 200 of the women are dating someone older than 25, but only 50 of the men are doing that. Result: there's 100 single women and 250 single men left -- which of course means it's much harder for the single men than for the single women to find someone for a romance. (Yes this means in the other end of the age-range, among people who are 70-90 there's many more single wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 03:35 PM
0

It's not minimizing effort, it's minimizing weakness.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:29 PM
4

Excellent question. Red pillers often try to take a scientific (As in, utilizing experimentation, control groups, and statistical analysis) to attempt to find many 'solutions' to the problems men face, especially in personal interactions with women.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:49 AM
43

I read that 'redpill' refers to people in white supremacist groups. I wouldn't say that's entirely accurate. Let's put it in tabletop gaming terms. MRA, RP, and MGTOW are all talking about a video game. MRAs say: This game is unbalanced. Here is how we can fix it. RPs say: This game is balanced. You just need to minmax, here's how. MGTOW say: This game is unbalanced. Fuck it, I'm not playing.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:26 AM
3

In the US, having court dockets be public knowledge is how we prevent secret courts. How do they do that in AU/NZ?
/r/MensRights10/04/21 04:19 AM
3

"Manosphere" I've heard used legitimately. It refers to MRA, MGTOW and RP groups combined. Even though there's very large schisms between some of those groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/21 03:16 PM
4

Indeed. There are times when it's justifiable to take something that's not yours. There are times when it's justifiable to harm or kill another person. There is no time when it's ever justifiable to rape someone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 11:02 PM
3

That seems more like an insult against redditors rather than an insult against girls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 10:04 PM
10

As far as the teacher applications: men sometimes avoid that career path so that they aren't branded a pedophile.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:44 PM
1

How’s it discrimination? Men don’t want to be teachers lol, there’s not much more to it than that. Because men not wanting to be teachers is at least in part due to male teachers being seen as a pedophile job.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 07:41 PM
12

I doubt it. Male disposability is shown in species other than humans, species that are OLDER than humans, and thus older than the concept of gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 02:38 PM
24

It is no exaggeration that male disposability predates humanity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 02:12 PM
-17

I disagree that they're similar. They're both bad, but hijab on is much worse than hood down. One is saying "Be ashamed of who you are and conceal yourself." The other is saying "Be ashamed of your culture and divest yourself from it."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/21 06:30 PM
21

I believe he is referring to infanticide, the killing of newborns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/21 02:30 PM
1

I whole heartedly disagree. Public discourse is NOT to change the other party's opinion, but rather so that onlookers can make their own decisions after hearing from all relevant parties. Now, if you believe it's on a location where your statements will be censored/removed, that's fine, as the discourse will no longer give onlookers all opinions.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 03:04 PM
1

Just to clarify: the majority of serial abusers I've met were basically "gets drunk after work, and beats wife/girlfriend." Not the jocks. Not the popular people.
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 07:31 PM
1

That may be the case, but doesn't really change anything I said. No, it provides a fairly focused rebuttal to a core component. Generally, serial abusers who quickly bounce into a new relationship after the old one ended are not that high on the social ladder, or at least my observations indicate such. Now, the higher profile serial abusers tend to be high on the social ladder, but not the majority. Thus it makes little sense that someone would put up with being abused, to be close to someone at…
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 07:29 PM
1

Oh, sorry, let me clarify: They tend to be easily able to enter a relationship with a new woman after becoming single (Usually due to the previous abuse victim escaping the relationship), but generally don't have a posse of underlings.
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 07:21 PM
1

Women also want a man who intimidates other men, because that makes them feel powerful, and helps them climb the social hierarchy. The woman with the most powerful husband gets to boss around the wives of his underlings. That doesn't jive with my observations. Most serial abusers I've met didn't have that large of a posse. Median of one.
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 02:24 PM
1

I for one welcome all comrades who truly share our views. Don't harp on people for their social failures, which usually boils down to being less attractive. We are better than that.
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 02:57 AM
1

It isn't about WANTING women. It is about feeling entitled to them. Most people I've met that were branded incels did NOT feel entitled to women. They were accused of feeling entitled to women, but were not actually feeling entitled. Most of them asked a very simple question. "Why was [INSERT SERIAL ABUSERS NAME HERE] able to easily enter relationships, but I'm not?" And for questioning the choices of women as a whole, they are branded as sexists. I feel sorry for them, but I don't have an answe…
/r/MGTOW225/02/21 02:55 AM
15

Yes, this is absolutely true, parents/siblings molesting young children is very common, and does occupy a significant statistical portion of all rapes. However, that drops off SHARPLY with age, moreso than other sorts of rape.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 07:33 PM
2

It's easy to tell when someone is giving you attention because they are interested in you vs. someone giving you attention to try to satisfy their sexual desires. I am hesitant to believe this. Given that a significant portion of seduction theory is to hide the fact that you're just attempting to satisfy sexual desires, it would be easy for you to be falling into the toupee fallacy here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/21 05:01 PM
1

Honestly, what it FEELS like to me, (I have no evidence to back this up, this is just a gut feeling, but I would LOVE to see actual research on this) Masculinity is only glorified in those who are successful socially. "Look at how good he is." To those who are unsuccessful, it is shamed. "How dare he try to be more than he is." I'd prefer it be embraced on both, but I'd be willing to accept it being embraced on neither. An example of why I feel this way: It feels as though the majority of hetero…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/21 03:52 PM
5

Wow, that is much better than my response, which is typically "Oh, so we're gatekeeping feminism now."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/21 05:50 PM
1

To be fair, I did use the word "literal" I was mistaken about how acid was consumed.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 07:20 PM
3

So I don't know that much about OnlyFans, But what percentage of accounts actually have stuff posted?
/r/MGTOW215/01/21 05:23 PM
9

On some level at least, attraction is governed by hormones and chemicals. It's not surprising that literal injection of chemicals can alter attraction.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 09:44 PM
1

Said comment was made after mine. Thus, I can only conclude it is not what the post I was replying to was basing it's information off of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 05:23 PM
4

The researcher has explained that "sexism" in the survey is defined as only against women so it will not be accurate for men in this subreddit who would rightfully include sexism against men when considering their responses. I have looked in OP's post history and found nothing. Is it somewhere defined in the survey?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 03:56 PM
5

It very much is. It's the difference between a libertarian and a republican.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/21 11:16 PM
0

I don't define healthy sexual relationships solely on whether or not someone can be prosecuted for their behavior. Fair. But on the other hand, lumping things that are just mildly shitty in the same pile as literally holding someone down and violating them muddies the issue greatly. I mean saying "if someone is manipulating you just don't be manipulated" is fairly unhelpful and unrealistic advice. If you are being lied to, then sure, that's legitimate. But here, it's a decision made. "Have sex, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/21 07:31 PM
0

I disagree with some of these, for the same reasons I am against some feminist talking points on consent. People are allowed to choose for themselves if they consent to having sex, under most circumstances. If someone says "Yes, I have decided that I wish to have sex", and we are deeming that to be not consent, then agency is removed from that person. I'm not saying it's always the wrong move. "I said I want to have sex because otherwise my partner would hit me." Okay, well being hit is somethin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/21 07:08 PM
2

No, We just chop off most male animals balls for their own sake.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 01:08 PM
-3

Not really. A human's penis and a cat's penis are very different anatomically. Last I checked, humans don't have barbs down there.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 01:08 PM
21

Oh come on, that's gonna get the parrot right activists out in full force.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/20 02:03 PM
10

I'm surprised by this, considering how prevelant the "Thicc" meme is. I would have thought said meme would make women think less of being thin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/20 02:16 PM
1

And my assertion, is that silver's assertion might not be true, due to there being people who think they are in the position silver believes to be in, yet are not in that position.
/r/MGTOW215/12/20 11:48 PM
5

I run a business that adheres to these principles. And I'm quite happy to announce my employees are very happy after I changed the work expectations. I've had a boss that claimed to adhere to those principles. I believe he legitimately thought he did. He didn't. He also claimed employees were very happy. I have no doubt that people filled out the forms saying they were very happy, but did so under fear of retaliation.
/r/MGTOW215/12/20 06:44 AM
2

I was of the impression that the colleges only rule on the issue of whether or not to expel the student. That is largely true, there's a few other things they rule on regarding transcript transferabillity. However, let's look at it from another angle. A college degree is a HUGE deal for a person. Yanking away their college degree, making them have wasted several years of their life, on classes that cannot be transferred is a big deal. Add to the fact that (before the DeVos changes), the federal …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 07:57 AM
2

Well, gerrymandering for one. We have such an odd system of elections, that the outcome may not match the will of the people, such as the 2016 presidential election, where the winner did NOT have the most votes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 05:00 AM
10

I disagree. Most militant feminists I've met, do indeed have strongly left leaning views for most non gender/sex related issues. Increase regulations on most businesses. Help the environment. Socialized medicine. Etc... Just because we disagree with them on one or two points, does not mean that all of their viewpoints are polar opposites. We often get lumped in with right wingers because we want to help men. Don't commit the same mistake.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/20 08:44 AM
9

Honestly, the most important thing you can do is speak up against discrimination. For example, there was a post being shared around my friend's facebook (I use the term friend at this point to describe how we're connected on facebook, not to describe actual relation), that stated Men who aren't trash don't give a shit if you call men trash That's crazy sexist, in multiple ways. It's normalizing a very common abusive tactic "The only way you can be not trash is to be sexist like I am." Just havin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 04:04 PM
1

Honestly, I find the best thing to do, is to simply have the same comic, but replace sea-lion, with the n-word. It really changes the sea-lion's actions into something reasonable.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 01:50 PM
3

Too much predetermined knowledge and exposure will influence your willingness to hear someone with a potentially opposing view. And some of that influence is reasonable. Hosting a candidate is expensive, and is supposed to be at least partially reimbursed by the candidate (usually). If one candidate has a history of skipping out on the reimbursement, it makes sense to oppose that candidate speaking.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:48 PM
7

It could also just be, "stop being stupid about the wage gap". I would have put it slightly more delicately, but I agree. Men have more social pressure than women to have a high income. It makes sense then that men would seek higher paying jobs, which often have greater risks, and are less comfortable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/20 07:10 PM
5

"men are taught they can't express emotions" Honestly, I believe it's true. They aren't taught it in the traditional sense, but it is very true that when I've been emotional, I've been treated as lesser, or a crybaby. It's not that men are less emotional, it's that we hide our emotions even from ourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/20 08:23 PM
6

In mixed groups, boys humiliate other boys to impress the opposite sex. In girl-only groups, girls humiliate other girls to get them to stay away from the boys they're interested in This seems counterintuitive, and goes against what evolutionary psychology would indicate. In live birth mammals, the biggest risk of a female's mate cheating on them, is that the female will have a harder time raising offspring. However, the biggest risk of a male's mate cheating on them, is that the male will spend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 11:48 PM
7

As someone who's coworker smells like they use axe as hand sanitizer, I fucking care when people overuse products to alter their scent.
/r/MGTOW224/08/20 04:16 PM
6

People tend to judge scents they are around quite often differently than those who do not often smell a given scent. It's why people don't notice their own BO. If she was around the perfume regularly, then her judgement will be that of someone who is used to it.
/r/MGTOW224/08/20 03:19 PM
4

I didn't say it was his problem. I did not imply he was obligated to help. I answered why it mattered if the perfume was olfactory offensive. Big difference.
/r/MGTOW224/08/20 02:16 PM
8

Part of your response is "why does anyone else opinion matter?" And the answer to that question for a subset of what she is asking is potentially "So that I am not offending the sense of smell of customers."
/r/MGTOW224/08/20 02:15 PM
19

For perfume, it matters, especially if she has a customer facing role. If I thought my cologne smelled good, but is unpleasant for others to be around, I'd want to know. Perfume would work much the same way.
/r/MGTOW224/08/20 01:19 PM
1

Indeed. The law is what's messed up. To briefly explain, If a newspaper claims someone committed a specific crime, and the person accused of it can prove they did not do it, they can sue the publication. The definition of rape in the UK pretty much requires having a penis, thus by not having one, she could prove she's not a rapist, and sue for defamation.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:28 AM
1

Whether new definitions are added or not is up to voters. https://www.urbandictionary.com/vote.php
/r/MGTOW223/07/20 04:14 PM
2

Odd question: The archive link is for "M.G.T.O.W" (Notice, there are periods, but no period after the w). The current link is "MGTOW", does this effect anything?
/r/MGTOW223/07/20 01:49 AM
1

There is nothing inherently hypocritical about distrusting the police (part of the executive branch), while trusting the courts (the judicial branch.)
/r/MensRights06/07/20 11:06 PM
14

Don't do this in Canada. I vaguely remember someone had their will that donated to a charity overturned. (If someone could find a news article, I'd be greatful)
/r/MensRights06/07/20 05:41 PM
17

The more sexually liberal we become, the more we reduce societal constraints on sex, the more impact the biological constraints left behind will have. As always, there's an XKCD for that. https://xkcd.com/592/ It's quite surprising how much Randall Munroe's points of view have changed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/20 03:20 PM
2

I'm about a 2 on the kinsey scale, so I'm not quite what you were asking for, but still slightly relevant. I could see myself fooling around with a man, but I have no desire to settle down with one. Does that answer your question?
/r/MGTOW230/06/20 08:49 PM
2

I don't think that's what they're encouraging. I think they're encouraging /r/MensRights to realize that other people conflate them with said garbage, hate-filled subs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/20 03:08 AM
17

This attitude is unrealistic. People are social creatures, and ostricism hurts. Telling someone to just do something and ignore the ostracism that will follow is not practical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 02:19 AM
2

Here's some good reading on the subject that explains how many of them feel. https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/31/radicalizing-the-romanceless/ It's not just that they can't find a partner, it's that abusive men can often easily find a partner, and when the 'romanceless' asks why this is, they are often accused of being a misogynist, and that's why they can't find a partner.
/r/MGTOW222/06/20 08:18 PM
1

Hollow points and any other armor piercing bullets Hollow points are the opposite of armor piercing. So, hollow points are stopped quickly by hard things, and instead flatten and deform, instead of pierce So when they go through something soft, like flesh, they will deform and expand, and be stuck inside, leaving a very unclean hole. However, they are unlikely to continue through the person, or through the wall behind that person, and injure someone else. FMJ, or full metal jacket is the opposit…
/r/MGTOW222/06/20 08:11 PM
1

Aren't hollow points recommended for use in residential areas because they're less likely to overpen and kill someone the next house over?
/r/MGTOW222/06/20 08:08 PM
1

This is true, one often obtains a skillset from their interests. That is not the only source one obtains a skillset from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 07:51 PM
1

You mention interests and hobbies. I find those only loosely correlate to abilities and skillsets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 07:49 PM
1

But the argument for a mother and father is mostly just in different abilities. Most long term homosexual couples I've met do have different abilities and skillsets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 04:56 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/gfs169/new_title_ix_regulations_no_longer_require/fpw7fum/?context=10000
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 11:42 PM
11

The fact that I can now confide in my coach in private, without my coach being obligated to start a process that I'm not ready to go through.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 04:31 PM
-3

Indeed. Trump has said on camera that he grabs women by the pussy. Biden at least denies his assaults, and welcomes a full investigation into it, and says that people shouldn't be satisfied with just a denial, and that's why it MUST be investigated. That difference alone is massive.
/r/MGTOW03/05/20 04:03 PM
3

Wow. That noise in the background at the first part was so ear grating that I had to turn off the video. I agree with the point, but holy crap, can you NOT make your videos physically painful to watch?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 10:44 PM
13

Yeah. Including simply unwanted comments makes this number worthless. Did you know that approximately 5% of people either stubbed their toe, or murdered someone yesterday? This doesn't mean there's an abundance of murders yesterday.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 04:21 AM
9

Your math is wrong. It's 15k back child support, meaning a one time fee, and then ~4.6k per year. It's still a lot, but let's aim to have truth on our side, lest our words be used against us.
/r/MGTOW03/04/20 04:24 PM
2

To be completely fair, it IS downvoted to oblivion. It's likely far negative, just Reddit never shows lower than 0.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 09:48 PM
1

Off the top of my head: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/andrew-yang-circumcision-809954/
/r/MensRights24/03/20 05:39 PM
2

Vehicular homicide is far more likely to be by a stranger than other forms of homicide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 02:56 PM
3

The answer to this almost certainly depends on if you include or exclude vehicular homicide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 02:00 PM
-2

What's your point? When someone posts an argument with such a glaring problem in it, it makes us as a whole look less credible.
/r/MGTOW18/03/20 03:45 PM
-4

That is evidence as to the bread being purchased. Not evidence as to who purchased the bread.
/r/MGTOW18/03/20 03:45 PM
-14

You've posted no evidence that the purchases were done by people who have previously abstained from purchasing gluten products. What's your point?
/r/MGTOW18/03/20 03:05 PM
2

A : rape kits are only useful when one of the party denies sex occurred. If both parties agree that sex occurred, but disagree on the fact that it was consensual, then testing a rape kit is a waste of money. It's also useful when the assailant is unknown. While stranger rape is rarer than other varieties, it does happen. Just as an extra note to this: It is often claimed that testing the rape kits would reveal links between rapes. I don't see how it would do so if the parties involved in interco…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/20 10:46 PM
44

I fear it is not to guide us to have a healthy space, but rather to identify those spaces which need be clamped down on.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:09 AM
5

What you are proposing is impossible. Posts over 6 months old aren't votable.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:40 PM
4

No, all posts on reddit auto lock after 6 months.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 02:39 AM
12

Here's my view on interviewing people. Often, unpopular viewpoints are strawmanned to hell and back. EG: Atheists eat babies. Millennial are destroying the world when they apply avocado to toast. MRAs hate women. That sorta thing. It is for this reason that I will not condemn someone for their views, without having heard their views from them. If someone's views are abhorrent, then it should quickly become apparent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/19 11:41 PM
10

MGTOW and TRP have little to do with one another. Not sure why you brought MGTOW in here.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:02 AM
6

From my understanding, it (the movie) was named before TRP (the subreddit) got popular. EDIT: added clarifications in parenthesis.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:02 AM
8

Cyntoia brown keeps getting paraded around as a self defense claim. She shot a sleeping man in the back of the head. That's not self defense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/19 08:18 PM
2

How would you feel if your teenage girl came home from school saying she felt afraid of going to the toilet, I’d be concerned about the idea of gender neutral toilets. I'd give them props for a new excuse. Kids always want to get out of school.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:47 PM
17

Depends on who hung it up. If it was the school then yes. But any student with access to a printer and tape could have done this.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:43 PM
2

Notice that nowhere on the chart is there anything for "Is she factually wrong?"
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:42 PM
4

I mean, the constitution spells out the power pretty clearly. "he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." He COULD pardon himself from federal criminal charges, but accepting the pardon means admitting guilt, and THAT will make impeachment super easy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/19 02:01 AM
5

Eh, I'd guess that at least a significant chunk of them are trolls that don't actually think that.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:11 AM
10

Teachers are unionized. Not in every state. They might be, they might not be.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:39 AM
1

Here: You'll need this if you want to be taken seriously. https://www.amazon.com/Creative-Pillows-Computer-Button-Desktop/dp/B0798PFN29 Your comment is painful to read with my poor eyesight due to lack of linebreaks.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:32 AM
1

I've seen this before. From what I could gather, this was a survey at a women's only school. The reason both Transgender female and Transgender male are on there, is if someone transitions before attending, and they are at the time a transgender female, attending makes sense. However, if a cis woman transitions WHILE attending, they will become a transgender male, and I can certainly understand a school not wanting to kick someone out for transitioning, hell of a hornet's nest to kick.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:29 AM
2

Yes. If two people are wed in a common law marriage, they will need to file for divorce. A common law marriage is exactly the same as a regular marriage.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:21 AM
1

No, they are exactly as constricting. Legally at least.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 11:06 PM
5

So the only one I think is a little iffy is the common law marriage one. In that for it to be a common law marriage both parties are required to agree to it. It also allows for people to do things in terms of medical emergencies and such. Like in cases where parents would otherwise not allow for medical care like receiving donated blood. If both sides agree, why not have a regular marriage, rather than one that magically appears just by living together?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:29 AM
1

My apologies. The usage of the word 'you' lead me to believe the comment was directed at me specifically, rather than the plural usage of 'you'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 01:34 AM
2

I simply stated the reason why something might be seen as a problem. You then put words in my mouth, and stated what my opinion was on how to deal with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 08:09 PM
3

If you see polygamy as a legitimate obstacle to achieving a relationship for yourself Evolutionary psychology will indicate a difference in the acceptability of non-monogomy in a partner between males and females. Looking at it from purely a live-birth mammal mating strategy perspective, females have less to lose from their partner being non-monogamous than males do, and this is rooted in our psyche.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 05:07 PM
5

Ever hear the phrase, 'Don't wish the game was easier, wish that you were better'? I have. And it's bullshit in this situation. The problem is that the 'game' is setup so that a certain percentage of people are left out. Can you help an individual person? Sure, but someone ELSE is probably falling into that same trap. You're essentially saying "IF everyone tries hard enough, they can be above average." Even if that is true for everyone individually, it's not true for everyone simultaneously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 11:26 PM
1

The only person out of line here is you. He is trying to have a reasonable discussion, and you are shutting him out, them accusing him of being offensive when he is defending himself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/19 02:52 AM
3

It has always been an effective social strategy to loudly and actively dismiss those low on the social totem pole. It's an easy way to gather "good and protects from the OTHERS" status by attacking those who are already outcasts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/19 01:31 AM
1

Silver does nothing for the recipient, but it DOES make the message more visible, even if highly downvoted.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/19 02:00 PM
9

Thank you, I was worried that perhaps she was demodded in response to this.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:55 PM
4

So, I've looked for this, and can't find it. I think I know what sub it is, and it's been deleted, and there are no mods with that flair. Can OP verify that this person pictured is still a mod?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:28 PM
6

Could we not promote people who are giving flawed arguments on our behalf? It makes us look bad. Whether he's right or wrong, promoting arguments with obvious logical flaws in it will simply give our enemies more ammunition. A trimester is 13 weeks, he's arguing that 6 weeks is more than a trimester. Also, given that a cycle is usually 28 days, and it's not terribly unusual for a woman to miss a SINGLE cycle, going for six weeks without one might not arouse suspicion.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:47 PM
4

Certainly. Iran & Qatar place greater importance on the average (median and mean) woman than on the average man when it comes to survival.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:10 PM
7

Then how do you explain countries where women don't have it so great like Iran&Qatar? Needs and wellbeing is a different concept from freedom.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:52 PM
9

If it is outright abolished, we also need to ensure that it becomes impossible to discriminate against being signed up for it or not.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:17 AM
4

I say we let men make their own educated decisions after consulting with their doctor. The side effects sucked for women, yes, but we have them a choice. You are advocating that we don't let men decide for themselves.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:46 PM
17

Indeed, I see quite a few parallels to women's birth control when it first came out. These side effects weren't maliciously inserted, they're simply the best we can do right now. Women were allowed to make their own decision as to whether or not they wanted the side effect prone early bc, we should give men the same choice while we research better ones.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:44 PM
85

He mentioned that men are disproportionately effected by automation removing jobs.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:31 AM
1

African american and African are quite distinct genetically. It isn't totally wrong to consider themdifferent races. Think about it. Take a subset of a race, mostly composed of those who lose tribal wars, then kill off any who don't survive a grueling boat voyage, and then have slave owners selectively breed them for a couple of generations. That's gonna change a few things in the gene pool.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 01:52 AM
1

For the specific comment I believe LilyBeetle is referring to, visit http://archive.is/My4gA If I am mistaken in the comment you are referring to, let me know.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:00 PM
10

Yeah, do retweet messages get a blue check?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:48 PM
33

Would you be okay with an afro gel that tells blacks to "Stop being hood rats, you can be better than that, police one another."
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:25 AM
102

And even beyond this, there's not much men can do about their height or their penis size. Height can only be increased through a surgery that's illegal in the US. (Basically break legs in multiple places, and pull em slightly longer then be bedridden for months as they heal). Penis size, admittedly, some men can increase, by becoming less obese. (Particularly fat men's penis will appear shorter due to fat covering up some of the base.) But it's usually not a big change except in the most extreme…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:20 AM
4

It's not gatekeeping even slightly. He is saying that few women play competitive games, and instead opt to play mobile games, and this is represented in the gender ratio at large video game tournaments.
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 06:11 AM
2

Correct. Nor was he charged with it. Yet some people are mad at the JUDGE for not finding him guilty of a crime he wasn't brought on trial for.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 11:15 PM
13

Also, harping on the judge in that case for being lenient. He was found guilty on all counts. Judges aren't the one that bring charges, get mad at the prosecutor for that one.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 12:46 PM
3

The idea behind that law change is that it provided an incentive to not get tested. If you suspect you're HIV positive, but never got tested, yet can't afford treatment? Then all getting tested will do is outlaw you from intercourse. I dissagree with this change, but can see the logic behind it.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:40 PM
2

I've been suspicious of the ACLU ever since they declared that people who feel their speech is so unpopular that they might need to physically protect themselves aren't deserving of free speech.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 05:57 PM
1

Discussing men's rights issues in a feminist environment is like trying to smoke a cigarette underwater...... I wouldn't say it's that bad, but it's close. The analogy I use is it's like trying to raise awareness of burn hazards, without saying anything bad about fire. Sure there are other sources of burns, like acid, but the vast majority of the problems cannot be addressed.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:12 PM
2

Indeed, it's reasonable to set bail based upon the accused's net worth. If I were charged 50,000 bail, that'd be pretty significant, if bill gates were charged 50,000 bail, he wouldn't care about losing that.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:09 AM
2

Correct.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:59 PM
59

Just to clarify: The ring girl who made the accusation is NOT the ring girl that he was accused of harassing. In fact, the ring girl he was accused of harassing defended him.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:35 AM
4

Good thing that the defense can ask for a bench trial then... oh wait, she meant that the prosecution can't trust them.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:06 PM
1

That's a good question, and there are competing theories about it. Here is my thoughts on the matter: The way biology is setup in terms of intersexual relations for live birth mammals, If the proportion of males and females is approximately 50/50 there will always be a significant amount of males unable to find a mate. This is actually a VERY important part of how evolution works, by having some not pass on genes. Ultimately, the reason why boils down to males being able to satisfy reproductive …
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:36 PM
9

therapist, or... the rapist? the letters are the same. WAKE UP SHEEPLE.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:03 PM
4

To me, it feels like a group of people trying to raise awareness of burn victims, and how to help/prevent them, while having all conversations about fires be forbidden. Yes, there are cryo and chem burns, and those can be discussed, but don't you date insinuate that fire is anything other than without downsides.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 12:46 PM
2

Thing to note about tor, you don't get to choose your domain, it will be randomly generated, and look like gibberish. Some type services generate many names until they get one that they like.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 12:36 PM
5

Change female partner like changing a job? So with endless interviews, trying for months without getting any responses, and then figuring out that the best way is to just lie about yourself? Sounds accurate
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:20 PM
14

(You wont get ugly muscles unless you use roids) Good rule of thumb, look around at a gym, for women who have a body shape/figure that you want, and do what they do. Chances are, it's weights.
/r/seduction15/09/18 06:30 PM
4

Yes, I think it was around $14,300.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 11:35 PM
2

A lot of states have a clause in their anti-housing discrimination law that basically says "If you're just renting out your spare room, you can discriminate." Whether it's against race, gender, religion, disability, whatever... there's usually an exception for that. It's true in the last three states I've lived in.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:42 PM
2

There are often exceptions for small places where the owner lives but this varies by state. Given that it is explicitly a "room" for rent, it's fairly likely that the owner lives in the same home.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:37 PM
2

Cloudflare is intentionally sabotoging archive links. That's what happens if you're effected.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:55 AM
11

Politics is the source of laws. It makes sense that those interested in legal rights would be interested in politics.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:00 AM
1

That allegation wasn't made. Rape requires possessing a penis according to UK law.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:45 PM
2

Well, part of it is that she has a perfect alibi. Namely, she doesn't have a penis, so according to the law, her actions can't be rape.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 05:54 PM
1

The first law mentioned is pretty reasonable. The second law mentioned where her actions aren't 'rape' however, is the fucked up part.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 05:00 PM
1

That is a reasonable way to handle it. Unfortunately, that's illegal in the UK.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 03:40 PM
13

There is the potential that they may eventually be able to say that. But I believe they need to be charged first.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:10 PM
319

I did a bit of research, and it's the LAW that's fucked up here, not the media. This is the harshest language that the website COULD use and still operate in the UK. In the UK you cannot say someone committed a crime without them having been convicted. And it JUST so happens that fellating a minor isn't rape, it's 'sexual assault on a minor'. And since rape is a crime on the books, that means they cannot use the word rape definatively.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 12:32 PM
3

tattoos or not are preference though The question is: how often are they preferred compared to how often are women tattooed? Here's a more extreme example. Some men find obese partners attractive. Some women are obese. Yet, the amount of men who find obese partners attractive is so miniscule compared to the number of obese women, that it is overall a net negative towards attractiveness to be obese.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:03 AM
2

No no, you see, Even though men work more hours than women, women work LONGER hours than men. Every hour that a woman works is 61 minutes long.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:10 AM
2

Thank you for presenting the other side of the argument in a reasonable manner. I didn't see the perspective of it encouraging people to not get tested. The new argument wasn't enough to change my mind, but it's enough for me to no longer reject the other side as unreasonable.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:49 PM
10

Superman = superfighter?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:34 PM
1

The fact that one characteristic is mutable and the other not doesn't effect it's ridiculousness imho. Being obese means a person isn't trying to change it. It likely means they live an unhealthy and gluttonous lifestyle. Being short does not directly implicate such.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 04:15 PM
1

Though I agree this post doesn't belong here, I do find it less rediculous than the fat acceptance movement. People can work to reduce their bodyfat level, but changing height is only possible through dangerous surgery.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 03:35 PM
1

You are assuming a normal distribution. It could very well be left skewed.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:56 PM
0

If you intentionally wear attention grabbing attire, you should not complain when your attire grabs attention. I don't care if it's a bikini or a suit of full plate armor with a clown mask.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 03:48 PM
2

Indeed. This is a great example of why we should have facts before deciding policy. While oftentimes we can make a good decision based on logic, sometimes reality shows a different picture.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:28 PM
3

This sounds like a counterpart to "You'd be a good boyfriend, you're just not for me." Often said about people who are constantly rejected, because they're a bad person.
/r/seduction19/05/18 07:46 PM
3

Indeed, how I often describe this phenomenon is "drowning person offended that dessicated person not repulsed by water."
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:02 AM
3

15 years in prison for murder doesn't seem terribly unusual.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:50 AM
3

The point of statutes of limitations is in the interest of fairness. Suppose you pissed someone off, and they want you to go to jail for heinous crime X, which you supposedly did on Y date, at Z time. Well luckily for you, On Y-Z, you were eating breakfast across town at your favorite restaurant, W, and could have possibly Xed at that time. Without specifically preserving evidence, how long can you prove you were eating at W? The point of statutes of limitations is so that the state can't just h…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:48 AM
12

Women don't want to sleep with the rest of the guys after they've had Ryan Gosling. There's more beyond that. Looking at standard mammalian mating from a game theory/logic perspective: (By standard mammalian, I mean the Placentalia cohort. Basically non-marsupial and non egg laying) If the objective is to have offspring who are also able to propagate, in a nutshell, there are three major factors in play that one may have control over on having successful offspring. Number of offspring. Resources…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:37 AM
5

That goes against my experiences. In my entire CS curricculum (Though I was in CS, not IT, which may have created the difference), There were four women on my team in group projects. Three of them were noticeably above average overall. (The fourth one was literally my first CS class ever, and she switched majors, but then again, MOST CS students don't stay after their first year, so that's hardly unusual) None of them were truly outstanding, but of those three, they all pulled their weight whene…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:50 AM
2

Wait... Was their github username really maymay? And their code was hosted on a repo named "Uber_Android_app_clone"? That's the strange part.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 02:33 AM
4

Prevention of secret courts is a good reason why.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:41 AM
9

However, there are a lot of benefits to females in this situation too. Lower oxygen consumption Higher CO2 toxicity resistance Kidneys perform better at 0G. Usually less mass Needs less food Etc... Those are all super important in space.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 11:40 AM
6

There's also right to genital integrity.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:33 AM
1

Aziz a reluctant pass saying he wasn't a rapist but he was still wrong Rape is a very specific crime. I predict that the speaker meant that while she still believes Aziz's actions should be prohibited, they do not fall under the definition of rape, and perhaps under merely sexual assault. I disagree with the speaker, but I can understand what the speaker was saying.
/r/MGTOW21/03/18 08:52 PM
1

I have looked, and am unable to find the post you are referring to. Has it been removed?
/r/MensRights21/03/18 06:14 PM
7

It might be a strategic play on his part. Does anyone know if there are any relevant laws that him revealing her name would make it harder to file a countersuit?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 01:11 AM
2

You do bring up a good point, the first wave of hormonal birth control for males is likely to have a myriad of side effects, just like the first wave of hormonal birth control for females did. We should also remember, that once it was out on the market, research went into minimizing those side effects. While the modern female hormonal birth control isn't perfect, it is a vast improvement. I predict the same thing will happen to men's birth control.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:46 AM
1

This is true. Historically speaking: Making a pill that causes men to be infertile is really easy, even temporary fertility that is fully restored a week or so after taking the daily pill, still easy. The hard part is not also causing erectile disfunction, many of the things that regulate sperm production ALSO play a role in erections.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:42 AM
1

Indeed. Hormonal birth control is not a decision to be made lightly. Female hormonal birth control is riddled with side effects, it's gotten better since it was first created, but it's still widly known. If even after all of this time, we still haven't eliminated the side effects of female birth control, why do we believe male birth control would be any better?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:40 AM
9

Here is a link to the full schedule for your convenience. It wasn't easy to locate, which is a problem, but there are women only sessions. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/prod-everyoneactive-wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/23104351/DulwichMPTT2.pdf
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:04 PM
1

As the reason for the rejection is because of statutes of limitations, I feel it is prudent to explain the reason behind laws having statutes of limitations. Without a statute of limitations, the government could find evidence that points towards guilt where there is none, preserve the evidence and wait, while exculpatory evidence becomes lost to time. Think of it this way: suppose you were accused of a crime that occured when you were eating breakfast on the other side of town. Without specific…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 06:35 PM
5

Statute of limitations is over it seems. Does anyone know which charges exactly were proposed? As statutes of limitations are enshrined in law, we should be able to verify this claim for ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:55 PM
10

No, if it is a truly random sample, it should have statistics/parameters relatively similar to the whole population's statistics/parameters. Once you start introducing bias into the sample size, you start to introduce bias into the results.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:56 PM
7

That doesn't matter if it's truly a random sample of the population. The margin of error is basically the limit of the chance that you picked a really bad subset.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:30 PM
1

Are you saying that those with proven records of false rape accusations are immune from having that record held against them in court? Yes. In the US at least. I am unfamiliar with courts in other countries.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:38 AM
14

Even if we had one, it would be worthless. If you are accused of theft, in a court of law, you are allowed to bring up that the accuser has been convicted of ten false theft accusations. This is not true for sexual crimes. If they don't even have that right in a court of law, what makes you think they'd have that right in a college tribunal?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:51 AM
2

unjustly putting people in jail is worse than letting a guilty person go free, If you need another reason for due process when arguing with a feminist, "If people think they will be convicted regardless of actual guilt, the law won't work as a deterrent. I want to keep this deterrent alive."
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:49 PM
0

You're right, nobody is going to reverse the tax. Because it's set to reverse itself. http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/20/pf/taxes/tax-cuts-temporary/index.html
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:00 AM
0

You mean the tax cut that's temporary for citizens, but permanent for businesses?
/r/MensRights15/02/18 02:03 AM
1

No, it's taking the side that it makes us look bad if the only one defending us is blatantly doing so for a reason other than it's the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 01:41 AM
5

But why? It's male only clubs that were closed, not attack-helicopter only clubs that were closed.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 11:56 PM
2

No, ten were selected, seven returned a verdict. What happened to the other three?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:23 AM
8

A huge part of the claims is that she programmed it herself, and the praise of her being a prodigy programmer for doing that.
/r/PussyPass11/02/18 11:29 PM
11

She did a lot of sleezy things, but stealing code wasn't one of them. She paid for the code to be written, and then passed it off as her own.
/r/PussyPass11/02/18 10:32 PM
15

Wait... FOUR people out of a TEN person jury voted to convict, and he was found guilty? That's absurd! Jurors should not be able to recuse themselves and have their vote not heard. If a juror isn't convinced enough to vote guilty, then the burden of proof has not been met.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:04 PM
1

I believe you, but is there a study backing this up? I haven't brought this up in arguments because I couldn't back it up.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:49 PM
4

We are doing something about that problem. When people have reason to believe they will be punished under the law regardless of actual guilt, the law stops working as a deterrent.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:35 PM
3

Indeed, KIA, another subreddit often accused of being alt-right did this, and turns out they actually lean left of center. I wouldn't be surprised if such a thing were the same here.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:04 PM
15

I rotated it for you. https://i.imgur.com/PGXmyzk.png
/r/MensRights15/01/18 10:39 PM
1

Why is this marked feminism? That said: medications having side effects is nothing new.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 11:03 AM
1

What country/state was this in? In the US, that ruling should never have flown, a minor cannot be emancipated unless they specifically request it, and placing a restraining order upon your guardian, without also appointing a new ward would certainly qualify as de facto emancipation.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:34 AM
1

Civil and Criminal cases have different burdens of proof. This is nothing new.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 05:17 AM
1

No, generally there is a curve as to how much a comment is voted on, it is VERY unusual for a grandchild post to have equal or more karma (positive or negative) than the grandparent.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:24 AM
1

Again: this is for mammals in general (Ignoring the egg laying mammals). You have to remember: pregnancy is hard on the body, and the female has to survive the pregnancy. Beauty often correlates with ability to hunt/forage, or whatever it is that this particular mammal does.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 04:09 AM
1

I've written a response a while ago that I believe explains from an evolutionary psychology perspective why this is a thing. The goal of evolution is to have children who can propegate their genes. This means both having children, and having those children be able to reach breeding age, and be able to successfully breed themselves. Thus males have two distinct strategies. "r" and "K". "r" is try to breed with as many females as possible, and do not invest into the offspring's well being. "K" is …
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:48 AM
1

good bot
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:34 AM
1

Ahh, so it was a multiple account thing. That's fine.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:16 AM
5

Let's not associate the term "grow a pair" with being brave. Standing up for yourself isn't a gendered trait. Unless a eunich is asking how they can have children, the answer is never "grow a pair".
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:02 AM
1

The word "Their" can be used to describe possession, OR relation. Tell me, does a man own their father? Of course not, that's because "their" is used to indicate relation, rather than possession.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:29 AM
1

I'll agree that the ban message is inappropriate, provided the picture is legitimate (which I harbor significant doubts about.) Unless a moderator is dealing with clear multiple accounts that are rapidly cropping up, please do provide specific information regarding bans. There is one other post by this particular user in this sub, HOWEVER, if they are indeed banned as they claim they were, the post that got them banned cannot have been under this account. That said, the post is fairly woman-hati…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:27 AM
1

What does the post on the bottom have to do with the banning? Are you proposing that the men's rights moderators banned you for a post in another sub?
/r/MGTOW06/12/17 12:21 AM
2

What does that post at the bottom have to do with anything? It's on another subreddit, that is only tangentially related to this one. Further, you give us absolutely no context as to your post. I did however find one post of yours in this subreddit, and it was full of hatred of women. Contrary to the media's view of MRA's, we don't actually hate women, we just believe that men's issues are largely ignored by society, and often exacerbated by feminist movements.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:19 AM
0

How do you propose we do that without enabling secret courts? Proceedings need to be public knowledge.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:07 AM
2

3.3? Jesus, what kind of school requires a 3.3 to start a prerequisite for graduating?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:14 PM
1

Do unto others as you want done unto yourself is a TERRIBLE motto when half of the population is drowning, and half is dying of thirst.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:42 PM
8

The post was made by a woman who thought that way. And the fact that a woman thinks this way is newsworthy. He wasn't claiming it was impossible, he was claiming it was unlikely.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:19 PM
4

As far as why it doesn't exist, Well, stopping sperm production with drugs is actually fairly easy, and we have a number of drugs that do this already. However, they also prevent erections, which sort of defeats the entire purpose.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:30 AM
2

EA has been shit for much longer than 2007.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:28 AM
10

No, secret courts are just about the worst thing a government can do.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 12:11 AM
3

No no no... He has to tear the toilet paper in half to give half of his feces. Oh wait, that's not what you meant by "half your shit"
/r/MGTOW09/11/17 12:43 PM
1

I'd say four to five years of alimony to have a comparable standard of living is an appropriate limit. HOWEVER, we must also change when alimony can be given. Divorces used to be divided into two categories "at fault" and "no fault". We got rid of "at fault", leaving only "no fault". Let's bring "at fault" back. If you're married, and the other person is the breadwinner, and you leave for no reason, or you cheated on your partner, then you should not receive any alimony. However, if your partner…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:10 AM
9

She also had LEGAL COUNCIL advise her on these. And what did the legal council say? They said the prenup was a TERRIBLE idea, and that she shouldn't sign them. She did ANYWAY. This isn't some guy pulling the wool over someone's eyes with legaleese, she was FULLY informed by a lawyer that it was terrible, and disregarded the advice.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:00 AM
2

If you are utilizing a collection of statistics as a single statistic, it is only as relevant as the least relevant statistic in the combination. And okay, I'll describe how it's normal. An adult is often defined as someone who is 18. So thus, someone who is one day away from being 18, who has sex with someone that's one day older would be added to this statistic. Having sex at that age with someone close in age to you seems perfectly normal.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 07:15 PM
0

Yes, legitimately bad things are included in that list, but so are perfectly normal things. If you make a list of people who were either victims of attempted murder, or stubbed their toe within the last year, and the number is sky high, that doesn't mean there were a sky high number of attempted murders.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:55 PM
0

The debating tactics exist for a reason, and they are highschool level for a reason, because they are the fundamentals of debate. Don't make people dig for sources for your claims, have them up front and ready.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:55 PM
1

is where the unethical (and likely illegal) activity starts to occur. Why is this unethical? Allowing people to trade sexual activity for financial gain is basically just prostitution, which is fine.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:47 PM
0

The linked blog gives no sources for it's claims. It is up to the claimant to provide sources for their claims.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:38 PM
1

Indeed, the vast majority of relationships I've seen have started with an interaction that would be considered harassment if they weren't successful.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:38 PM
1

During the first 18 years of life, did an ... family friend ... actually have any type of sexual intercourse with you?” So... one in six boys had a sex with someone from another family that their family has known for a while.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:24 PM
9

"Unwanted sexual experience" is a very vague term. This is about as valuable of a statistic as the one in five. Honestly, the term is so vague, that I'm genuinely surprised it's not higher. Could someone find the exact definitions used?
/r/MensRights28/10/17 03:37 PM
1

As far as things that are legal to do while male, and illegal while female, some states forbid females from being topless in public. The ability to have an abortion is often under attack. The ability to opt out of parenthood is something both genders should have, let's work to improve men, not drag women down. 1 in 8 women are effected by breast cancer, several orders of magnitude more than men. STDs are noticeably more likely to be transfered M->F, than F->M.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 09:37 PM
1

I'd say that following someone home is more than just minor harassment. But as far as the rest of it, I agree.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 09:31 PM
5

Are accusations mostly justified? It would require a full investigation to determine this conclusively, but I'm leaning towards most of them being unjustified. Does it say anything about sjw's, about men, society? Anything? It mostly speaks that normal courtship behaviors, that most men must perform if they wish to enter a relationship, are being demonized.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 09:28 PM
2

Even if the dynamic changes for "hot dudes" it doesn't matter. Women are allowed to have standards and to lower or raise them as they see fit. A lot of men would lower standards (of intelligence or whatever) if the woman was hot. The problem is that to enter a relationship, men are expected to do something "forbidden" and then hopefully have it be forgiven later.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 11:43 PM
3

These are not mens rights issues, I would say that the dynamics of the sexual marketplace is directly relevant to men's rights, as rules are laid down as to the socially acceptable ways to attempt to woo a woman, and the sexual marketplace dynamics determines who gets to bend those rules, creating an even more unfair setup.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:13 PM
12

To be fair, "forced himself on me" would certainly be appropriate language for forcibly kissing someone, which while that would be a crime, it wouldn't be rape.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:47 AM
11

I see boyscouts and girlscouts as drastically different things. They teach fundamentally different skills, and there is a place for both of them.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:18 PM
3

Indeed. Too often men's issues are neglected, until a contrived situation where a woman is effected instead occurs.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:49 PM
1

this is very clearly a predator looking to take advantage of someone wasted out of their mind. Agreed. To me, that is very much a rape. This is where our thoughts differ. What the woman was trying to do was terrible, and probably should be a crime. But that crime should NOT be labeled "Rape." Rape is VERY specific, it is for when someone has sexual intercourse with someone else, before gathering the other party's permission, OR when we have ample reason to overrule that permission. If someone wi…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:41 PM
2

No. I'm defending someone accused of attempting to rape, when the accusation is on shaky evidence. I'd do so for a man, I'd do so for a woman.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:23 AM
-6

I don't think the situation he prevented was a rape. Did the driver do a good thing? Yes. Was what he prevented a rape? No. Sure, the man was drunk, but if he was coherent enough to ask “what are you doing?!" when a cabdriver suddenly guns it with him in the car, then he's coherent enough to consent to sex.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:37 PM
4

The possibility is so low even for those unvaccinated because of herd immunity.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:16 PM
3

I applaud you editing your post to indicate that your fact hunting did not validate your claim. We must be careful to look at the facts, and acknowledge not only when facts refute claims, but also when facts cannot support claims.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 10:22 PM
2

I dislike this sub for sometimes having greasy incels Why does someone's inability to attract a mate influence the worthiness of their arguments?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:51 AM
1

No, I'm saying the removal of fault divorces encourages marrying a rich person, then intentionally tanking the marriage to get money out of it.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:17 PM
3

The no fault divorce laws weren't creating no fault divorces, they were preventing there from being fault divorces. Or in otherwords, the law wasn't for (no fault divorces), but rather no (fault divorces).
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:23 AM
6

Before, divorce was categorized into two types, "Fault" and "No fault". In a no fault divorce, assets are split fairly between the two. In a fault divorce, one party is seen as the reason behind the divorce, and not given an even share of assets. (I use the term assets loosely to mean physical items, future income, custody, and anything else that would be split upon divorce)
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:59 AM
1

Declaring into law that "Maschii" translates to strong, and "femine" translates to gentle is the problem. It is engraving the stereotypes into law rather than ditching them.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:46 AM
5

I fully agree that someone shouldn't need a qualifying reason for divorce. But they will need a qualifying reason to not be "at fault" for the divorce. The advent of "No fault" divorce is what leads to this behavior.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:00 AM
1

There's another questionable law passed mentioned in that article. The state seal has the words "Fatti maschii parole femine" engraved on it, which is Italian for "manly deeds, womanly words.", Except they're declaring into law that it translates into “Strong deeds, gentle words.", which is inaccurate.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 04:51 AM
3

It's not directly related, but the psuedo normalization of the availability of pornography helped to reduce the demonization of male sexuality. Thanks to him, it is significantly less creepy weirdo behavior for a man to indulge himself, and explore his sexuality.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:00 AM
3

He was quite influential in making pornography a "normal" thing to look at, and not a creepy thing.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 10:14 PM
2

He did specify the state in the title, California.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:49 AM
1

No, the ability to waive those rights is NOT enshrined in an amendment to the US constitution. (It is specifically enshrined in a few State constitutions, but not the federal constitution.)
/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:24 PM
1

... Yes you can. It's called waiving a right. The right to a trial by jury is often waived, when the accused believes it is better for them to be tried by a judge rather than a jury, for example, or the right to a speedy trial is waived if the accused wants more time to gather their case, etc...
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:11 AM
14

Yeah, as much as it's stereotyped in the south, it's not actually that common.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 05:25 PM
4

It would be trivial to find examples of women who have lived objectively harder lives than your average man. It would also be trivial to find examples of women who are taller than the average man. It doesn't change the fact that men are on average taller than women.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 12:04 AM
6

Doubtful. Monarchies ruled by women historically have been more prone to war than monarchies ruled by men.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:59 AM
1

The biggest beneficiary will be infertile women and the men who love them. Or the women who don't want to damage their body through pregnancy, whether infertile or not. I'd say that those who are unable to perform X action without Y item, are more impacted by Y item's creation, than those who merely do not wish the consequences of X action.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 08:58 PM
0

Honestly, while I'm against this idea... it's fundamentally more sound than discrimination based on race/gender. At least people choose whether they served in the military or not.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 10:36 AM
1

Because theoretically its possible to have a species where one has an "Ovidepositor" instead of a spermdepositor, Isn't that kinda how sea-horses work?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:47 PM
12

.... Did you post this comment like 50 times and it vanished, or was I glitching?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 02:46 PM
2

I also want stricter privacy laws, like Germany's, so someone accused of sexual assault's life isn't ruined because of just an accusation. While I agree, privacy would have it's benefits, where exactly do you think the balance should lie, considering that the other side is the ability to have secret courts.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:31 PM
41

I'm of the opinion that neither should be allowed. Separate but equal didn't work, we had a whole argument about this in the civil rights era.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:58 PM
1

I've spent a large amount of time in the MRA community here. Not so much on the MGTOW or RP community, and I have not noticed this phenomena. In the MRA community, it seems to be the exact opposite. So long as the woman in question either legitimately wants to help, or has legitimate questions (Even if a bit instagatory), they are welcomed with open arms. The hivemind oppinion seems to be "A wonderful ally, as their claims cannot be as easily dismissed as self-serving." Now, obvious attempts for…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/17 11:24 PM
1

I'll be blunt. This doesn't sound like rape the way you posted it. It doesn't sound like rape if you flip the genders. You got drunk. You weren't tricked or coerced into drinking. You made bad choices when drunk. Now, she's not a morally upstanding person, but even if everything you said is true, she is NOT a rapist.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:32 PM
2

Let's face it, a three year old he said/she said isn't going to go anywhere justice wise. Since we won't be able to get justice out of this situation, about the best thing we can get out of it is pointing out sexism.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:31 PM
1

No, it's perfectly logical for a woman to be one if they are attempting to gather power for themselves. It's also perfectly logical for a man to be one for purposes of virtue signalling.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 03:53 AM
1

I'd argue that MRAs should pay attention to the issue, due to it's proximity to "Nice guy" "Friend zone" and "Nice guy" are very related concepts, as a "Nice guy" is a man who has fallen into the "Friend zone". And "Nice guy" is often used to silence men's opinions for being unsuccessful in finding a relationship.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 03:51 AM
8

One point of mystery: why don't mothers teach their sons about this stuff? Because, quite often what a woman wants to be attracted to, and what they actually are attracted to are two different things.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 03:40 AM
1

It's still a procedure that's designed to be permanent, that we happen to be able to reverse sometimes, compared with an IUD which is designed to be temporary and wear off on it's own.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:43 PM
1

The problem with that is the laws for what constitutes "trafficking" is absurd. Have more than two doses on you? That's possession with intent to distribute!
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:42 PM
6

This seems like a terrible idea. Get drunk, have sex, and forget to press a button on your phone? Better call the cops and 5 of your contacts!
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:09 PM
9

I also agree that it's wrong to take advantage of people in such a state. However, that's not rape.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:48 AM
2

Indeed. I'm not sure if I suspect malice here. It'd be fairly easy for machine learning to see that this is a bunch of charts, and contains URLs at the bottom. If this was posted from a computer that you don't often use, I could totally see this tripping some filters.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:45 PM
1

I am quite unfamiliar with the UK's justice system, could someone give me a brief rundown of the UK's rights of the accused?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 01:56 PM
47

All you did was post a picture, which cited nothing. Claims require evidence.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:32 PM
34

Please post a source.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:15 PM
4

Wasn't impotence also a common side effect? Kind of makes birth control pointless if that's a side effect.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:07 PM
2

Note: you need to make sure SHE is in a single party state too, otherwise it gets.... questionable.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:48 AM
1

Originally it was a derogatory term towards gay men, insinuating that they have fecal mater on their penis.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:55 PM
23

You do realize that those walls are literally designed to have the minimum possible echo, right?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 04:14 PM
2

Oh sorry. We don't have the right to vote unless we sign ourselves up to be potentially ripped from our lives and sent overseas to fight.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:36 PM
2

THE LAWS AREN'T EVEN THE SUBJECT OF MODERN FEMINISM. Here's how I see it. Feminism is fighting for equality under social pressures. MRAs are fighting for equality under the law, whereupon we can point to laws on the books that are discriminatory against men. One seems SIGNIFICANTLY more important than the other.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:22 PM
1

Defendants have a right to question their accuser in a court of law. I cannot in good concience approve of anyone's incarceration when they cannot question their accuser, despite the accuser's availability. (Availability might be the wrong word. I mean still living/not in a coma/etc...)
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:25 PM
2

Here's an undelete link https://www.ceddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/6fymqg/feds_drop_bombshell_up_to_100_girls_may_have_had/dimf1sg/?sh=d5c5ef93&st=J3OMZBZO
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:59 PM
2

To be fair, the left is pushing for similar systems as social safety nets.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:48 PM
135

Indeed. Men are shamed much more for their sextoys than women are. Sextoys for men are generally meant to simulate a human vagina as closely as possible. Sextoys for women tend to be considered more empowering the further they are from male anatomy. Two foot double ended vibrating dildo? You go girl! Standard fleshlight? What a wierdo deviant.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:43 PM
2

This will vary greatly between states. Research the putative father registry, it's generally the extent of rights unwed fathers have.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 02:30 PM
4

Honestly, I'd recommend you ask those subreddits, then post the responses here, so you can learn both sides of the story.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 01:49 PM
2

Just a small hint to make your post more readable, put doublespaces between lines, otherwise they don't show up. It shows up as one big blob that is difficult to read, especially for those with dyslexia.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:43 PM
9

Tear down what she says, not her looks. Throwing insults around like that is no better than us being called neckbeards. Physical appearance is irrelevant to this particular discussion, we are better than such petty attacks.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:27 PM
5

I agree there is a double standard, and I try very hard to be impartial in my actions. The following assumes you live in the United States. Right now, the most important thing, is that you are safe from further harm. Generally the easiest way to do this is extracting yourself from the situation. Immediate danger is the first thing we must protect against. You may be tempted to shower at this point, but that is inadvisable, as it may make later steps less effective. Next, you should record and pr…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:25 PM
1

Well then, the same applies to my hypothetical "Whites only" apartment. Nonqualifying families would be able to rent other apartments within the complex. They would literally be able to go rent at the same time period an identical apartment within the same apartment complex.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:10 PM
1

Ok but actually in this situation one check out lines for a short while only allows women but the profits go to a good cause while other lines do the same thing and allow everyone. So... You're saying that only people who belong to one group are allowed to contribute to the good cause via this method? Further, why does it being a good cause matter? Is discrimination okay if it's in the name of the greater good? Would you be okay with a "Whites only" apartment that donates to disabled veterans? A…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:04 PM
7

Honestly, no, I'm not. I've had trouble finding a partner. Keep trying to be helpful and a good person, and find someone to share life with. Keep failing. See abusive assholes with more red flags than a Chinese parade get rewarded with sex. Get told I'm failing because I objectify women, just like those sexually successful people do. With that feedback loop, it's come to the point where I'm desperate enough for any amount of contact that I would not feel comfortable pushing the issue.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:53 PM
2

So it's okay to only allow certain genders access to certain facilities, as long as you have facilities available for both genders? I seem to recall separate but equal doesn't work. This is separate and unequal. Let's replace movie theater screening with another service provided by some buisnesses, checkout lines. How would you feel about a straight only checkout line? Is this acceptable, even if there are other checkout lines? Would it be okay if there's a straight only checkout line, and a non…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:47 PM
3

How is this not discrimination? I'll grant that it's just one screening/theater. That means it's a small amount, but it's still discrimination. And are you stating that discrimination is okay, so long as it's a small amount?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:31 PM
2

Remember: Right now the biggest talking point against MRAs right now is LITERALLY that we're complaining about a business denying service based on sex/gender. We can use this to our advantage.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:24 PM
1

Honestly, this time, they didn't seem to be pulling a ghostbusters, silencing criticism of the film by simply painting the opposition as sexist. This one might actually be a decent film, I'm not sure. It's probably not going to be top 10 of the year, but it's also probably not going to be trash tier either.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:22 PM
19

Would it be possible for us to organize a FB group to discredit and explain every post of theirs?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:16 PM
24

A company refusing to serve someone based purely on sex/gender is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:39 PM
16

This sign is a good thing. Do not blame those who posted the sign, as it is meant to be a shield for men who would be harassed upon entering, so that they can literally point to a sign.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:11 AM
8

On one hand, you are forcing fathers to visit a child they might want nothing to do with. On the other hand, this law might be what gives some divorced fathers the ability to see their children.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 11:59 AM
5

This just in! A corporation has investigated itself for wrongdoing and found nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 11:57 AM
5

MR deals with far more than just dating and relationships. There are other areas men face inequality in too. Draft, court sentencing, discrimination in hiring, genital mutilation, and several other issues, and is focused on fixing the issues for everyone. TRP is about just dating/sex, and is focused on how to fix the problem for individual people.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 06:24 PM
4

In a nutshell, RP is mostly about inequality in the dating sphere, and what men can do TODAY to improve their chances in a broken system. MRA is about more than just dating inequality, and it's about trying to fix a broken system.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 06:21 PM
9

I freqüently ask myself, what way would be acceptable for women, for men to express their sexuality (which is arguably more intense)? That largely depends upon how it is received, Or in other words, you can't know until you try, and it's only acceptable if you're attractive.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:26 PM
9

Given that Red Pill is a movement entirely separate from MRAs, it isn't strange that someone would believe the movie "The Red Pill" was not following MRA philosophy.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:55 PM
2

Women are clearly lying when they say they "don't need no man," the constant articles featuring women whining about not being able to find a mate proves it. Honestly, I'm not so sure about this. Polygamy will be seen as the answer.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:57 PM
1

Fair enough. That system seems inefficient, but constitutional. I had not considered such a system. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 09:08 PM
24

Straight up unconstitutonal, it violates the 6th amendment. In criminal proceedings, you have the right to a trial by jury. This law dictates that a single judge will magistrate.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 03:53 PM
1

Are we talking stuffed with bills, or coins?
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:42 PM
2

Okay, let me break it down for you. A MAN joining a group that blames MEN for problems is joining a group that de facto blames HIM for problems. A WOMAN joining a group that blames FEMINISTS for problems is joining a group that does NOT de facto hate her for problems.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:27 AM
2

The difference is... Feminists blame MEN for problems women face. MRAs blame feminists for the problems they face.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:36 PM
1

I don't think it was a plan, so much as the natural consequence of hitting r/all
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:20 PM
4

"Man, you guys are too busy defending yourselves to get stuff done. I guess I'd better attack you more."
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:18 PM
9

A subreddit for men talking about issues, like it being legal, and socially encouraged to chop off parts of a male infant's penis. How about it being legal, and encouraged to deny men scholarships, in the name of equality, despite being underrepresented in higher education as a whole. How about the gender sentencing gap? You know how there are complaints about blacks receiving higher sentencing than whites? The disparity between men and women is WAY larger.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:14 PM
1

True, Lauren is now legally a man, but this particular picture is old. I think it's pre transition. (Please, correct me if I'm wrong)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:11 PM
1

Looking back, meninism had the opposite effect. We were going for a Church of FSM type thing, but not enough recognized it.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:10 PM
3

The sub made it to front page of r SLASH all. Anytime that happens, a lot of people see it, and vote accordingly.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:05 PM
6

Sadly, male MRAs tend to be ignored for "looking out for their own interests", and "not knowing the pain of being a woman". And as such, female MRAs, tend to be listened to more. I strive for a world where that's not the case, and we are listened to equally, but that is not the world we live in today, and it is a fact we must acnowledge.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:03 PM
7

Someone agreeing with the bailey that feminism uses when criticized, does not mean they agree with the motte used otherwise.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:01 PM
5

Talking about men's rights without bashing feminism, is akin to talking about preventing burns, without talking about fire safety. Sure, there are chemical and cyro burns, and those need talked about too, but.... leaving out the primary cause seems contrary to the goal.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:59 PM
27

Sadly, female MRAs are significantly more influential than male ones. Because men just get accused of looking out for their own interest and not knowing how hard women have it. Ideally, it shouldn't matter, and we should be working to a world where it doesn't matter. But that is not the world we live in, so for now, we must recognize this fact.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:56 PM
3

However, men don't even have all of the same rights as women on paper. We do not have the right to genital integrity, whereas women do. We do not have the right to opt out of parenthood via abortion, whereas women do. We do not have the right to opt out of parenthood via safe haven laws in about half of the states, whereas women do. We do not have the right to apply for a LARGE number of federal scholarships, whereas women do. We do not have the right to apply for certain federal grants given on…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:53 PM
16

The problem with feminism, is it sounds like an abusive relationship. "No, let's focus on our problems, not yours, ours are worse. Okay, so discriminating against men and mutilating male's gentitals is legal. But that's the patriarchy's fault. You know men's. All of those problems are YOUR fault men, and your only salvation is through feminism." Doesn't that sound like an abusive relationship to you? Blaming them for their problems by using language that strongly implies blame, and when called o…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:48 PM
1

Honestly, trying to talk about men's rights without pointing out feminism, is a lot like trying to talk about how to prevent burns, without talking about fire. Sure, there are chemical burns that don't come from fire, but it's far from the majority of them. Same thing here.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:53 AM
1

Can this be done without violating rights against double jeopardy?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 09:59 PM
1

Honestly, I'd be fine with either situation. I'm generally against aesthetic only body modifications who's purpose is to create an unnatural appearance. I think it's dumb. BUT: if an informed adult willingly proceeds with the procedure in a medically safe fashion, then I have no problem with it.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:41 AM
15

That's bad for the man plumbing
/r/MensRights28/04/17 03:45 PM
1

There HAS been a lot of research for new male birth controls. However, since the 50s/60s, testing requirements are a LOT more stringent before letting new things come to the market, way past the point where it's needed. If the pill from back in the 50s/60s were going through clinical trials today, there's no way it would pass. So basically, the government decides for men "Nah, you can't have this, it's too dangerous." Meanwhile, something just as dangerous gets grandfathered in, so that women DO…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 12:32 AM
1

that exactly zero of women's birth control options prevent HIV and STDs. Female condoms have a significant degree of protection against HIV and STDs. Further, SOME spermicides also have antifungals that protect against fungal STDs. Though these are uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 12:19 AM
1

I mean, his voting record is actually rather left leaning considering he's a republican in a red state. His voting record isn't consistant with him being 'alt right'
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:16 AM
3

Here's how I see it. MRAs are trying to fix a broken system. Finding the fundamental flaws, and tearing down expectations all around, especially the problems ignored or worsened by mainstream feminism. TRP tries to work the broken system to their advantage. Much of their stuff is sexist. However, it tends to find success. The important distinction is what situation would cause a community to self disband. (Not collapse, but disband) What will cause MRAs to self-disband? Our concerns being addres…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:55 PM
6

Indeed, that is a significant part of why TRP is so successful. When a man has no luck attracting a mate, and sees abusive men enter relationships easily, the man wonders what he is doing wrong. When he asks this, one of two things generally happens, either he is given the same advice as he's already been trying, which leads to him thinking there's a deeper issue; or he gets blamed for being a nice guy, only being nice for the sake of companionship. Well then, if you ask TRP, you get specific an…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:58 PM
1

The only important thing is that he needs to make the decision while the mother still has time to abort the child legally. Then this becomes a game of hide the baby bump from the father until the third trimester.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:26 PM
1

Honestly, I think a good portion of it that's often overlooked is that men are more willing to go into a field they don't like, purely for the goal of earning more money. Given that a large amount of a man's attractiveness is based around financial security, it's not unexpected. Women decide to get sillicone implanted, men decide to get a high paying job they hate, both for the same reason.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:31 AM
3

Though there have always been feminists lurking here, I'd wager that there's less feminists here than there are MRAs on feminist leaning subreddits. People often project faults of their own group onto the 'enemy' group. And one of those, is that feminist subreddits censor any opposing views, by simply deleting them, and declaring them concern trolls. So naturally, MRAs must do the same thing, right? So why bother going there.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:38 PM
1

It's also effected by men being taller on average. Lightning tends to strike higher objects. I'm not sure how big of a factor this is.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:23 PM
4

Is that still a thing? I haven't seen that in like... 20 years.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:05 AM
1

Considering that married men get paid more on average than unmarried men, then yes, according to feminist logic, they ARE respected and more privileged than single counterparts.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:27 PM
2

Free will is a fairly encompassing category. It includes many things, including the ability to make bad decisions. If someone wants to spend all of their paycheck on lotto tickets, I'll think they're a moron, but I won't stop them, it's their choice. Same concept.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:19 AM
3

Have you actually read the RedPill subreddit? I don't like them, as they do legitimately objectify women. But calling what they do to be rape is just lightening the term. Knowing how to strategically insult someone to make them more likely to sleep with you doesn't magically rob the other person of free will. Machiavellianism is accurate though.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 11:34 PM
3

There are three often confused groups. MRA, MGTOW, and RP. They all for the most part agree that the game is rigged against men. Where the difference is, is how they respond. . MRA: Let's change the rules to be fair. MGTOW: I'm not playing. RP: Well, maybe if we exploit loopholes in the rules, it'll be fair.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:31 PM
7

It's 72 hours in america. Lookup how Habeas Corpus works.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:05 PM
5

That is some impressive markup there. Never seen a post like it on reddit before.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:02 PM
3

This is three years old. Any particular reason you're posting this now?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 09:56 PM
0

Honestly, I'm not sure that's the reason. I see there being a major difference between putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger, knowing one instant you will be alive, and the next you aren't; compared to taking a bottle of pills, falling asleep sometime later, and never waking up. The difference is control. It is a last ditch effort to retain control over one's life, by controlling the exact instant it ends.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:21 PM
1

Here's a link to the original of that video, you've linked to a repost. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxeIOjmQ9lE
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:46 AM
8

This looks like an edit. Does anyone have a link to the original?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 10:22 PM
7

There's a couple order of magnitude difference between billion and million. Also, the high end truffle market is SILLY expensive. It's a hilariously overpriced delicacy. I have no problems believing someone earned multiple millions from mushrooms.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 03:51 PM
1

Blue eyes from two hazel eyed parents is possible. It's an odd circumstance, but it can happen. http://genetics.thetech.org/how-blue-eyed-parents-can-have-brown-eyed-children
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:39 AM
1

Link so you don't need to type it
/r/MensRights24/03/17 12:23 PM
5

How big of a deal is phase 3 in Indonesia? I'm unfamiliar with Indonesia's testing requirements. Honestly, I'm worried that this is just snake oil.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 12:22 PM
16

If you accept him as your son, then he is family. However, it is helpful if someone can accurately describe their medical history. Blanks in history are much better than wrong answers. Based on the answers you gave us: Lactose intollerance can show up for non-genetic reasons. So without knowing more, it tells us nothing for certain. The child of a couple with green/brown eyes can have either green or brown eyes. So, nothing you've stated here hints that he is not your biological child.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 12:19 PM
1

"You know, I don't know how to treat it, but I'm pretty sure that decapitation wouldn't cure his flu." . "I want to see suggestions from you then if you think you know better."
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:01 PM
7

Specifically there are Penny 1¢ each. (The bronzeish colored ones), 5¢ total. nickle 5¢ each. (The medium sized silver ones), 15¢ total. dime 10¢ each. (The small silver ones), 30¢ total. quarter 25¢ each. (Big silver ones) 50¢ total. And that adds up to $1
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:06 PM
7

Interestingly enough, they both use the phrase "to have turned into anti- intellectual shitholes." with the same punctuation (notice the space after the hyphen). HMMM.....
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:01 PM
6

2.) will I get a return on my investment ($$$ put into college) with a good job later in life This one is becoming scarily more relevant. College costs are increasing way faster than the benefits are. If someone is looking at college as an investment, then it's not a surprising choice, and of people I've spoken to that view college as an investment, most of them were male.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:17 AM
5

We complain about having infant genitals mutilated being socially acceptable. I guess that's meaningless. We complain about constantly being one poor presidential decision away from being ripped from our families, handed a gun, and told to shoot people we've never seen before. I guess that's meaningless. We complain about not having as many resources when suicidal, despite making up the majority of suicides. I guess that's meaningless.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:33 AM
3

Although this article brings up a good point, and I'm sure that this accounts for some of the reason behind the usage of more lethal methods in men, it skips over what I think the primary reason is: regaining control. I see there being a major difference between putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger, knowing one instant you will be alive, and the next you aren't; compared to taking a bottle of pills, falling asleep sometime later, and never waking up. The difference is control. It i…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 12:42 PM
1

There is another downside to anonymity of people accused of crimes. It allows for secret courts.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:43 PM
1

Why are you saying that my ability to provide meaningful consent is tied to someone else's age? My ability to consent should be based around my state of mind, not someone else's.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:56 PM
8

Just because something is relevant to men's rights, doesn't mean women are at fault. Contrary to what r slash feminism believes, we don't actually hate women.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 12:56 PM
15

No, it certainly applies to men's rights. The sex economy is the root of a fair number of inequalities. A study showing the depth of the sex economy is certainly relevant. Further, this shows that a not insignificant portion of women in positions of power are there because of their vagina, rather than earning it.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:55 AM
2

When the alternative is to require physical contact, it seems reasonable.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:48 PM
4

Huh, I thought type 4 was the "It doesn't fall into type 1,2 or 3" catch all category, and that type 3 was the equivalent of a standard male circumcision. I'll have to look into this.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:24 PM
1

True, but it does open up another avenue of defense against a rape accusation. The defenses for such accustations broadly fall into two categories. It was consensual and We didn't have sex.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:57 AM
21

Agreed. However, I have a proposed solution. I'll use the following terms, petitioner will mean the spouse who filed for divorce, and recipient, who is the other spouse. Divorces are broadly categorized into two realms. "Fault" and "No fault" Fault divorces are where a specific reason can be pointed to. Abuse, Adultery, Imprisonment, Abandonment, etc... If the petitioner requests an at-fault divorce, then alimony can be awarded to the petitioner. (Or to the recipient, if there is a counter-claim…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:53 PM
1

Here is my stance on it. There comes a point when something is so corrupted, it is easier to tear down and build anew than to fix it. Gender studies flew over that line, went in reverse , got out of it's car, and took a dump on the line before cruising off, laughing maniacally.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 01:03 PM
9

Oh, that is an important thing to teach. However, gender studies curricula tend to teach the exact opposite. They paint you as being valued for being labeled as unprivileged, regardless of the truth of that label.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:29 PM
11

Hatred against men is often taught under the guise of equality and gender theory.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:23 PM
1

Verbal strength: It's bullshit that women are better than men in this regard. I'm not so sure. Just because this is difficult to measure objectively, doesn't mean there isn't a disparity. Imagine if it were very difficult to accurately gauge physical strength, but men were still stronger on average. How do you think feminists would react to the statement "Men are usually physically stronger than women."?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:59 PM
2

I see no problem with this device. This is designed for use to deter/prevent/punish/evidence-trail violent rape. I mean, unless the woman is wearing it to consensual sex, and not telling the man, what's the problem here?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:34 AM
1

So are you saying that MRAs are hating based upon missguided beliefs about feminism?
/r/MensRights03/02/17 11:15 PM
1

I don't understand your point here. Does the reason we came to a realization detract from the validity of that realization?
/r/MensRights03/02/17 11:01 PM
1

I would view that the same way as I would wearing a "Make America Great Again", a pin with the Democrat logo, or any corporate logo. Whether it's a movement I agree with or not, it has no place on a judge in a courtroom.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 11:00 PM
2

Banned? No. Banning a movement pushes it underground and fuels its legitimacy. Let it decay in open sunlight.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:40 AM
2

I'm not defending his political views. In fact, I'm not defending him at all. I'm defending her, and her rights. I'm defending her right to make a decision, even if she doesn't have all of the information. I'm following the guideline of noone asks to be raped. After all, if she said "Please have sex with me", and complying with her request would be rape, like some in the thread insinuate, then the logical conclusion is she, on a quite literal level, asked to be raped. I'm saying she is responsib…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:38 AM
11

Honestly, you will probably find most people here aren't inherently against feminism. However, what we are against is people who push back, against letting men have equal rights. We push back against those that think we're being overdramatic when trying ensure infants aren't mutilated. We push back against those that tell men you need to be more open about your feelings, and then belittle those same men when they open up. We push back against those that want equal pay for lesser work. We push ba…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:45 PM
3

There is nothing polarizing about pointing out that men shouldn't have to have a crystal ball to look into the future, to determine if someone's consent is valid. There is nothing polarizing about thinking that shitting in someone's sink is an immature way of dealing with anything.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:29 PM
2

In civil court, where the standard is much lower but still reasonably high, you should still need beyond a reasonable doubt that the misinformation was intentional. Traditionally, civil courts require "Preponderance of evidence". Are you suggesting we should change the requirements in civil court to "Beyond reasonable doubt"? I'd be okay with raising this to "Clear and convincing" (Which is between preponderance and beyond reasonable doubt), but raising it to beyond reasonable doubt seems too bi…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 02:53 AM
3

In Ohio at least, you don't need to transport someone to kidnap them. I don't know how it is elsewhere though.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/17 02:48 AM
9

When someone asks that question, I usually respond with just Broomstick I find that often, the shorter a response is, the more it causes the other person to think about it. Sometimes that's more important than explaining nuance.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:56 AM
2

Interesting. After thinking about it, yes, the legality of prostitution is a men's rights issue. A large amount of 'female privilege' comes from scarcity of sex for heterosexual males. Perhaps by allowing prostitution, it will increase the 'supply' of sex.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:50 PM
1

Advocating for people to not breed because of perceive flaws with intelligence IS something the Nazis did.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:46 PM
1

It says it's at only one signer? Is something wrong with the website?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:43 PM
1

Honestly, with the way a lot of school administrations lean, you had best make sure this post can't be found by potential employers. Because the districts that wouldn't let you work there, are the ones that need you the most.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:27 PM
3

I find the last part alarming. No, not #3, but the actual part about not using the internet. A lof of the privileges had by females only become truly apparent through analysis of statistics. Without the internet, it becomes far harder to find these statistics needed.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 10:44 AM
3

Notice that so many of these are "And the other person will be of my race." It seems to me that the primary complaint is "I can't be racist!"
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:45 AM
1

4 year degrees are exceedingly rare for people in HR. and HR folk have always been the weak link. Possibly related?
/r/MensRights16/01/17 05:12 AM
3

Honestly, I'd expect technology to be able to swap out whole chromosomes by this point in time, so I don't think that will be true, except for people who want 100% of the genetic material to come from the parents. Similarly, if chromosomes are randomly assigned from both parents, there will be a 25% chance that a male homosexual couple's child will come out with YY, which is an unviable combination. Of the zygotes that survive, 2/3rds will be male, and 1/3 female.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:02 AM
1

Certainly true. Sexual selection effects men,women, and anything else. But: it tends to effect men significantly more, both historically and in modern times. This is due to the simple fact that excluding specific males from breeding does NOT significantly impact a hunter-gatherer tribe's ability to procreate. But, removing females DOES lower the overall procreational ability.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:52 PM
1

I'd say they have the right to spew the hate. You have a point about the psychological trauma, depending on exact circumstances that may or may not be within their rights. All groups have a right to communicate their desires (first ammendment), and so do people have the right to assemble (also first amendment). This applies to all, even the KKK.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 11:54 PM
1

But wait, we're not allowed to ask the witness about past sexual history! What is this sudden bout of sanity?
/r/MensRights07/01/17 08:47 PM
1

Uhh... I always thought it was a euphemism for masturbating into a toilet?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:05 AM
12

Even so, $24k a year is quite the sum of money. The amount is crazy high.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:17 PM
1

America did some pretty hideous things back then too. We imprisoned people solely on account of Asian heritage.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:14 PM
2

So, she's being charged, and presumably tried for a crime. That's good. The fact she was able to do this is tangentially relevant to the inequality in the dating sphere. This has very little to do with men's rights, IMO.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:53 PM
3

Do a pregnancy test. It might explain sudden behavioral changes.
/r/seduction26/12/16 01:36 AM
3

either rent or own air to breathe. Okay, hypothetical time. We live on a space station now, and air has to be manually filtered/oxygenated. Who should have to pay for maintaining the 'atmosphere'?
/r/MensRights24/12/16 11:38 PM
7

Interesting. After thinking about it, yes, the legality of prostitution is a men's rights issue. A large amount of 'female privilege' comes from scarcity of sex for heterosexual males. Perhaps by allowing prostitution, it will increase the 'supply' of sex.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 11:35 PM
6

$75 wasn't compensation for the wrongful imprisonment. The prison hands EVERYONE $75 on their way out, that way someone who's been in there for 10 years can feed themselves for a few days while they try to get on their feet.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 08:42 PM
1

Evidence is still needed just like in any trial. Nope. Not for a parole hearing.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 05:59 PM
7

Someone on another thread brought up a great point. He's very easily blackmail-able by anyone with a vagina right now.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 01:52 AM
7

I would have no problem with a standard jail sentence in this case. But a taste of freedom, to be overshadowed by paranoia, that a single utterance from a woman could remove your freedom, regardless of whether your actions are reasonable or not... That is a cruelty. Also, this punishment is lifetime. His crime does not deserve a lifetime of punishment.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:55 PM
5

Are you honestly going to imply that this guy is the victim in this situation? I am implying that he has an unfair judgement placed upon him that is essentially saying "Every time you interact with a female, if they disapprove of it, you're going to prison, regardless of whether or not your interaction is reasonable."
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:29 PM
8

must not approach, contact or follow any female in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress". With the way this is written, given that distress is subjective to the distressee, it is impossible to determine the legality of the action before performing it. And if an action's legality cannot be determined without performing the action... it might as well be de-facto illegal.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:19 PM
1

I usually respond with "Because I can recognize the signs of an abusive relationship, like being told I'm worthless, and that they are my only salvation."
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:25 PM
1

According to the concept we're talking about: You can tell if there's immediate attraction, but even if not, if you act quickly, there is a high chance that can be changed.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 05:56 AM
5

It is deeper than that. It originally refered to the counter-intuitive phenomena that attempting to ensure compatibility in a potential partner reduces the chances of finding a compatible partner. (This is because the time spent ensuring compatability reduces the chances of mutual attraction drastically enough to overshadow the 'improvements')
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:21 PM
4

I agree with you for the modern meaning of 'friend-zone', but the historical meaning is different, and more appropriate of it's name. A common concept in PUA communities is that attraction is set in stone quickly, but not immediately. I'm not sure it's true, but it's a fairly common concept. Let's look at something from the perspective of someone who believes it's true. Man meets woman. Man is attracted to woman. Woman is not currently attracted to man. Man spends time to ensure compatability an…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:19 PM
16

You don't turn off the subreddit style? Ugh, I can't blame them for banning you.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:16 PM
1

Nevertheless, being unable to post is significant, even if it means it's not a total ban.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:28 AM
1

Aright, hypothetical time. Let's suppose that men and women applying for a job have the same average skill, same standard deviation of skill, same distribution of skill, etc. Further suppose that skill is accurately, and precisely measurable. And the employer will want to hire the most skilled people they can. Now suppose 10% of applicants are female, and 90% are male. And the employer has their hands tied, and the new hires must be 20% female, 80% male, but aside from that restriction, they wil…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:05 PM
1

Encouraging an under represented group to apply is fine. Giving the under represented group an advantage when it comes time to hire is not.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:04 PM
0

I got jumped and beat up. Am I a victim? No. Uhh, what? That sounds like textbook assault and battery. Last I checked, that's a crime in all 50 states.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:25 PM
1

What country/state do you live in? Perhaps we could help you research?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:19 PM
5

There is nothing inherently wrong about a law declaring multiple acts illegal.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:55 PM
1

That looks to have a slight bias to the left in fact. Where did you get this data from?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:53 PM
5

Sadly, what the majority thinks is largely irrelevant. It's what congressmen and/or judges think that matters.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:23 PM
3

Noone deserves to be made fun of for having a libido. Old, young, male, female, straight, gay, and anything inbetween. Now, about the TRP and PUA that you mentioned. They exist for different reasons. Honestly, I don't know what the MRA movement can do to help them. As long as "assholeish" behavior is rewarded with sex, or if that APPEARS to be the case, then there will always be a spot for them. They both exist because of discrepancies between what feminists claim men should do, and what actions…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:46 PM
6

Noone deserves to be made fun of for having a libido. Old, young, male, female, straight, gay, and anything inbetween. Now, about the TRP and PUA that you mentioned. They exist for different reasons. Honestly, I don't know what the MRA movement can do to help them. As long as "assholeish" behavior is rewarded with sex, or if that APPEARS to be the case, then there will always be a spot for them. They both exist because of discrepancies between what feminists claim men should do, and what actions…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:46 PM
2

There's a logical fallacy there. /u/fac1 is trying to argue that A⇒!B where A is "speaks positively about anal sex" and B is "has problem with gay people." You are stating an example of (!A)&(!B) and are claiming that that provides a counterexample. The two statements are not contradictory.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 11:02 AM
3

Very well. When someone asks if they used a term correctly, I operate under the assumption that they are either unsure or misinformed.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:18 PM
7

A variety of methods employed in tandem is usually the optimal way to communicate a message like this. Facts, logic, humor, satire, and emotional appeal can be used in tandem. Each one has it's own purpose, upsides, and downsides. But you do bring up a valid point: should this sub be limited to one post on /r/all, then this is not the optimum one.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:16 PM
3

So it is not from ignorance that you used the wrong word, but intention? Are you trying to point out the irony in improper labels? If so, bravo, that's actually an impressive literary technique.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:10 PM
10

It is actually a very real problem of trying to fight a non-gendered issue by claiming it is a gender based issue. Take for example gamergate. Whether you agree or disagree with it, it originally founded around "Hey, if you're reviewing a game, you should probably disclose the fact that you are in a sexual relationship with the developer." And that got pushback and branded as a gendered issue. The original post helps bring to light this problem.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:04 PM
5

still though, did I not use the word correctly? Honestly, no, you didn't. At least research the stereotypes you throw around. Go look up Alpha/Beta/Omega male.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:01 PM
9

Pardon me for thinking we should outlaw cosmetic genital mutilation of infants regardless of gender. Pardon me for thinking that if a situation is so terrible that we require conscription to defend the country, that we shouldn't ignore 50% of the talent pool due to gentialia shape. Pardon me for thinking people on trial should have the right to face and question their accusers in a court of law, regardless of what they are accused of. Pardon me for thinking.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 05:58 PM
2

"If the assailant does not realize what he is doing." I bet that line is the one that had the most "it's acceptable" answers. After all, if someone is literally unaware of their surroundings and actions, they're either unconscious, having a seizure, or hallucinating VERY badly.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:48 PM
2

I worry about such an overgeneralizing headline. "I think it is acceptable for someone who is one day away from their 18th birthday to have sex with someone a day older." Well guess what, in Virginia, that is LITERALLY stating that rape is acceptable in a certain circumstance, as Virginia's statutory rape laws are a bit wacky. (It's possible for a couple to be able to legally consent to sex with each other one day, and be unable to the next day.)
/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:43 PM
16

She might be being charged with pre-marital sex. Details are scarce.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 11:33 PM
3

I'm sure people here have heard the phrase "Women are not something you put nice tokens in and get sex/relationship/etc.. out of." Part of the reason some men view women that way is they have SEEN women be treated like something you "Put abuse tokens into, and get sex out of." And they see that strategy working. So they think there has to be a better way, perhaps by being nice. And then when they ask about this paradoxical failure, they are branded assholes that only want sex. How dare they try …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:56 PM
1

That post is enough for you to be committed in my state. (To clarify, I mean state as in location, not state as in status)
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:30 PM
69

A reason for this is due to the Baker act. Also known as the "If you ask for help, we're throwing you in an asylum, which is worse than hell." It really disincentivizes people from seeking help.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:33 PM
1

DID YOU JUST ASSUME HIS TABLE'S GENDER?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:24 PM
3

I mean, the right's anti abortion stance is pretty well documented. And that certainly IS removing a right that was hard fought for.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:28 PM
1

Could it be that the cops are afraid of arresting a nude woman for fear of accusations?
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:24 AM
2

I mean, previous political experience isn't a requirement for presidency. You just need to be a natural born U.S. citizen. Be at least 35 have lived in the US for the past 14 years Not have been an officer in the confederacy. (Probably not relevant anymore)
/r/MensRights13/11/16 07:38 PM
1

as it is not a mental illness, gender dysphoria cannot simply be treated through therapy. I don't see how this stands. Are you saying that all mental illnesses can be treated via therapy? How else would it being untreatable through therapy imply it's not a mental illness?
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:21 PM
1

Also, notice how they can't even be bothered enough to kill someone: they're asking for people to do the dying at their bidding, with no effort from them. To be fair, saying "I will kill you" is illegal. "I hope you die" is not. Obeying the law should NOT be decried as laziness.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:11 PM
1

If I'm reading those graphs correctly, they seem to imply that it's minority males that changed demographic, shifting the expected outcome. That's surprising to me.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:10 PM
1

I don't have total faith in google translate, could a native speaker please confirm/deny this?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:45 PM
4

No, there are certainly ways to prove there are death threats. Recordings, SMS logs, email logs, etc...
/r/MensRights06/11/16 01:02 AM
29

There is a statute of limitations, and I do believe the statute had either passed, or was nearly passed, and the woman claimed she was being kept silent via threats, which delays the statute.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 05:40 PM
1

Most guys on dating sites are pretty nice and friendly. Yeah! Those are the crude, sexist men! The nice guys!
/r/MensRights04/11/16 10:16 PM
1

Indeed. When comparing two problems, if one of them has a better result from ignoring the problem, than the other does in best case scenario, I'm disinclined to think they're equal.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 10:04 PM
1

infertility is especially a concern, because that defeats the purpose of birth control. Not really. The reports of erectile dysfunction certainly defeat the purpose though.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 05:00 PM
2

Also erectile dysfunction was one of the mentioned side effects, which kinda defeats the whole purpose.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 06:03 PM
3

The scientists wanted to continue the experiment. The research subjects wanted to continue the experiment (Well, over 93% of them) The first ethics committee wanted to continue the experiment. It wasn't until a second ethics committee that the experiment had to be halted. The men WERE putting up with the side effects, for the most part. This says more about an overly strict requirements for testing than it does men. A lot of "older" medications wouldn't pass initial human testing these days, due…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 06:02 PM
1

Yup, that would be rape in most US states if he did what she asked. But you have to remember, Noone asks to be raped!
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:18 PM
11

From the article A legal loophole in Ontario means sperm donors could be held liable for child support even more than a decade after they donated their sperm to a friend or family member. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights28/10/16 03:48 PM
2

Honestly, both candidates are sexist. Hillary obviously is sexist against men, Trump is sexist against women. Hillary has said that the primary victims of war are women. Clearly being callous towards the sacrifices men make, because obviously losing a husband is worse than being shot and killed over oil. Her push for Title IX, which is often used to remove men from college without the ability to defend themselves is troublesome. Trump's "locker room talk" is sexist against women, and shows just …
/r/MensRights28/10/16 03:00 PM
1

And what's your point? This is a valid question, and a valid topic. The only way I could forsee this being an attack is based off of the original post getting edited. So for the record, I'll copy/paste the OP below. Hello, I am interested in your perspectives on the existing major US presidential options (mainly Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton). Comparatively, how would men's issues be better off - with Trump or Clinton (why, if you can detail)? Thank you.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:56 PM
2

I don't like to lump people together unless I'm sure about it. And in this case I'm NOT sure. MRAs get lumped in with RP quite often, and I know how unfair that can be, so I want to be careful to not lump together other groups.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:39 PM
1

You will have to speak with a Redpiller about that. I know there is a fairly sizable overlap between the two groups, but I'm not going to speak for them.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:33 PM
4

I'm not a Redpiller, so my understanding may be flawed, but there is a large amount of overlap between RP and PUAs.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:26 PM
13

That's not entirely correct. RP, MRA, and MGTOW are three distinct groups, that all believe some variation of "the game is rigged/unfair towards men." Where we differ is how we react to that. . MRA: We should try to change the rules to be fair. RP: If we are discriminated against by these rules, let's try to exploit the same rules to counteract some discrimination. MGTOW: This game sucks, I'm going home.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:08 PM
24

Yes, and we have long argued against the name of the Red Pill movie, that it would create confusion, as MRAs and RedPillers are quite distinct groups.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:02 PM
2

Not sure if that will work. It says "Preference for female", not preference for woman.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:48 PM
10

They might be thinking states rights. Unless a power is specifically granted to the federal government, then it is given to the states. And I find it hard to believe it falls under the "necessary and proper" clause of the constitution.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:13 AM
1

Anyone have a mirror of the post? It was removed.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:34 AM
-3

No, that's not what it means at all. A not guilty verdict could mean "We're 90% sure the accused did it, but 10% is too much doubt."
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:53 PM
1

Be that as it may, they are at the very least transparent about their moderation and bans.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:07 PM
1

Regardless of what the cause for the difference is shouldnt men be afforded ample space and room to work on those things? Should women be afforded ample space and room to work on improving physical strength? The answer is the same for both questions: Yes, but apply it fairly.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:55 PM
1

That button is for people who browse imgur to find the corresponding reddit post. He did not place that link, imgur did it on it's own.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 02:32 PM
2

After all, they consider it "rape" to trying and "convince" someone to sleep with you My response to that is "At what point am I no longer allowed to change my mind about not having sex? Do I have to make my final decision the first time I'm asked?"
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:45 PM
1

I've taken about seven years of Karate, and my sister took one of these classes. She was taught pretty effective things. How to break various holds, go for the knees, and such. Say what you will about it being sexist, but the course itself was pretty good for how short it was.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 08:11 AM
3

Honestly, I think there is a correlation, but I think the causation is something else: People with autism genes tend to have children later in life.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:57 PM
1

Assume, no. Recognize as a possibility? Yes. It's the same way nearly all doctors will run a pregnancy test before performing certain procedures.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 01:03 PM
1

You forget about the most important category in such judgements. The "Wow, this person put enough money in my bank account." group.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 12:51 PM
3

To be fair, that's closer two nice cars, than one decent car.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 03:18 PM
3

They proport it as a place to talk about men's issues without railing on feminism. I view that as absurd as a place to talk about burns and burn victims, without talking about how fire is dangerous.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 03:29 PM
2

That is making several assumptions. 1.) Men and women have the same average (mean and/or median) of applicable skill 2.) Men and women have the same standard deviation of applicable skill. 3.) Institutions that hand out degrees or other certifications required do so without sexism. 4.) Men and women seek to become board members in equal numbers. . If just ONE of these is false, then we should NOT expect equal numbers in board rooms. Now, I think 1 is true. 2 is likely untrue. I am too unfamiliar…
/r/MensRights11/09/16 12:36 PM
6

To be completely fair to /u/ExpiresAfterUse, he is telling people what US law is, and options granted by the law. Legaladvice is not a place for talking about what the system should be, it is a place for talking about what the system currently is.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:15 AM
6

I think this is a stupid practice, but I do not feel this should be illegal, provided that, in the interest of equality, women who's chests aren't as heavy as the required weights, will be required to wear additional weights. Similarly, if a man has large enough breasts, he would be exempted. Further, I feel the same way about your hypothetical jockey short manufacturer's scenario.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 09:21 PM
1

Does someone have the OP saved? The post was deleted.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:21 PM
4

No, they're capable of detecting latex residue in the vagina/anus. Though that would make it even weaker evidence, as it would not link the accused, but it wouldn't make the test pointless.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:40 PM
22

It also does fuck all if the defendant claims they had consensual sex. Rape kits don't detect consent, they detect intercourse.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:36 AM
2

No, but that's the reason it wasn't a peaceful revolution.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:32 AM
1

America has anonymous voting for a reason, to prevent coercion.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:17 PM
3

Trying to have a conversation about men's rights without talking about feminism, is like trying to have a conversation about preventing burns without talking about fire. Sure, there are burns caused by things other than fire.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:15 PM
4

On average, how much footage do you record per minute of final video? I'd imagine you throw out quite a few outtakes and such.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:45 PM
1

I support the removal of barriers men face towards teaching professions. Due to the extra risk males face being elementary school teachers, men are less likely to pursue such a career.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 12:09 PM
1

http://imgur.com/hI1a3j1 Yes, they are BOTH on the second page, and near the top.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 08:30 PM
2

I believe the right to be safe, and free from assault is a far more important right than to be paid fairly for labors. Both are incredibly important, but there is still a priority. Does it come as any surprise then, that speaking about the right to self defense, an important component in preventing assault comes before talks of pay equality?
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:38 PM
1

.... no it's not? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4wnjav/all_men_want_is_to_beat_up_women/ Was on the second page for me. EDIT I mean no, the earlier post wasn't removed by mods. This post is INDEED a repost.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:35 PM
2

Possibly because the bottom post is a repost of something posted 16 hours earlier? Also, I still see both on the second page.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:34 PM
1

I'm not surprised, but it is an important step towards equality of opportunity, and this outcome helps prove that even if opportunity is laid equal, the outcome may not be. (I've met many feminists who seem to believe that if men and women have equal opportunities to become profession X, that the gender ratio will be 50/50 in that profession)
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:49 PM
5

Indeed, I'm against this for the same reason I was against ghostbuster's casting choices. Let the story come first, don't fuck it up with gender politics.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:39 PM
0

No, we will win the fight with facts, and let them be their own undoing. We don't need to smear them with meaningless drivel like this. We are above this.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 01:40 AM
9

If someone claims they were raped, I agree, we should support them, and believe they were raped unless facts say otherwise. However, that support must not be harmful to the accused (if there is one), until the claims are proven, or at least substantiated enough for temporary injunctions.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:35 PM
1

The point is, we are trying to win by being right, instead of by bashing the opposing side with insults.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:18 PM
5

It's completely missing the controversy, by highlighting one of the times when consent is clear, and alluding that consent is always that clear.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:48 AM
3

Please use NP links.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:52 AM
4

Georgia (The state, not the country) student here. Graduated in may with BS in Computer Science. Most teachers were in support of women's rights. I had little contact with non CS/Math teachers due to how my schedule worked out. However, something notable that stuck with me is my English Lit 2 teacher was also the head of gender studies. And she did state that all genders have issues, and we can't neglect any of them. So that's a good sign. Back to the CS department, it's fucking obvious how much…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:02 PM
1

I do agree that the penalties are currently too soft. However, if someone is accused of a false accusation, they still deserve all standard rights of the accused, including a presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:32 PM
4

join a class and meet a nice girl with similar interests. But... but... if you talk to a girl with unwanted contact, you're literally a rapist.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 11:05 PM
1

I'd be surprised if you got banned just from posting here. You haven't shown up on their radar yet.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 08:30 PM
3

It's at 73% as of the time of this posting, is it possible it DID at one point reach the 75% threshold and then fall down to 73%?
/r/MensRights15/07/16 07:16 PM
3

That comparison just isn't right.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:01 PM
7

No, don't shame someone for being unmasculine.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:54 PM
15

No, we're better than that. Don't abuse takedown requests to censor them.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:53 PM
9

A study based on 1,000 tweets would get laughed at for being so absurdly narrow. Statistics time! If you have a group 100,000 large, which can be one of two options (in this case, insulting or non insulting), and take a RANDOM sample of 1,000 out, and calculate the average of the random 1000 large sample, there is a 95% chance that the average of the small sample is within 3.08% of the 100,000 group's average. EDIT: Bonus math, suppose the first group were ten billion large, and the sample size …
/r/MensRights08/07/16 10:10 PM
1

To be fair, regardless of gender, sociopaths are often described as charming.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:15 PM
1

there are NO arguments against feminists pushing for things like fixing Roe V Wade to not completely shit all over their basic human right to privacy, or fixing aberrations like Texas's abortion clinic issues. Feminism still has fights to win in america, but they need to learn that men are not the issue that needs fixing. No, there certainly are arguments against feminists on those subjects, just not from us. We must be careful that we don't get mixed in with the people who DO argue against them…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 09:08 PM
1

Correlation =/= Causation. That said, this is a good reason to investigate more.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 04:44 PM
1

Lunch capacity too. DUDE! If lunch capacity helps be an olympic athlete, I'm gonna be #1 on every sport!
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:02 PM
8

Your wife is prohibiting you from being a parent? Because that's what it sounds like. Teaching someone how to be aware of their surroundings is an important life skill, and your wife is BLACKMAILING you into neglecting your daughter.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:41 PM
2

Perhaps he's saying it shouldn't happen either way. I disagree with that sentiment, but wanting AoC lowered isn't inherently sexist.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:20 AM
1

To be fair, "Do this, or you will be thrown in a cage" is a pretty effective motivation.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:10 AM
21

Simple: tell them you are afraid of revealing your sexual preference for fear of being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:06 AM
1

"invalidating his experience" (gosh, how PC is that idiom?). Not PC enough. Replace his with xir.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 11:07 AM
1

Here's a tip, remove the tip.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:03 PM
1

It has to deal with polygamy, and how society looks upon such. From a purely evolutionary standpoint, it is more beneficial for a male to have many female partners, than it is for a female to have many male partners. And this is coded into human instincts. As such, there will be FAR more men seriously looking for multiple partners than there will be women. There are biological drives in play here, that should not be swept under the rug, which is exactly what is being done in political discourse.…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:46 PM
20

When asked: simply state "I don't want to say what minority group I belong to, for fear of it bringing further discrimination upon me." And what's more, it's COMPLETELY honest, as men are underrepresented in most universities, and stating that you are a man would lead to exclusion from a lecture.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:34 PM
1

Better suggestion: You can choose where your money goes when you pay. I think deliberately excluding a specific charity sends a bigger message.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:34 AM
1

Hey, did you hear about the bill that just got signed by the president? It was written by Poe! Poe's Law is a thing now!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:52 PM
3

"Thank God 50 Shades of Grey came out when it did, it helped my barrister normalise that," he said. Wow, this man is thankful for 50 Shades of Grey? Perhaps he should have gone for the insanity defense.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:50 PM
2

How is the check for $6000 when they consumed two $2500 bottles of wine? Tax and automatic gratuity on checks above $X?
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:08 PM
3

Would I be incorrect in guessing that your accuser was a woman? That is not the case, according to her other post
/r/MensRights05/06/16 01:37 PM
11

"yes, it is, but it was a man who made that law" Yes, Hitler killed a lot of Jews, but he was part Jewish himself, so it's not discriminatory.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:11 PM
9

The music in the background is INCREDIBLY loud, and makes it very difficult to hear her speak.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 05:49 AM
1

Stereotypes generally dissipate VERY fast, unless they are either True at least a substantial minority of the time. OR Someone is profiting from the stereotype. (Usually financially)
/r/MensRights01/05/16 06:37 AM
1

there are 2 types of feminists: 1 2 3 MAKE UP YOUR MIND!
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:30 PM
1

How should someone that isn't currently in a relationship answer questions about their partner? Should they leave the question empty, or should they fill in with data from their most recent partner? What if the person answering the question was never in a relationship?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:09 PM
1

To be completely fair to her, if the election is Hillary vs Trump, ensuring Hillary and her warmongering doesn't get into the whitehouse, even if it means putting a rapist in there, wouldn't be an unreasonable view.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 07:29 AM
1

If you couldn't use the recording in court, Usually, even if the evidence is collected illegally by a non-government agent, the evidence may still be used.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:15 PM
3

I'm going to take a guess and say that http://imgur.com/oUsTN1K is the picture in question? I've already posted a response to it on my friend's post. Let me copy/paste it for you. While the first statistic is despicable, let's look into the second statistic, and why that's the case. It's the case, because you don't sue for child support, you file/apply for it. If you had to sue for child support, it would be a LOT harder to get, as suing requires the standard of "Preponderance of evidence", wher…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:19 PM
2

It's too angled! Real tanks have curves, shitlord!
/r/MensRights06/04/16 09:34 AM
0

Would you mind attacking his argument rather than him?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 10:49 PM
1

Did the carvings happen before or after the relationship? I'm seeing more red flags than a Chinese parade from the article, but let's make sure the red flags actually existed at the point in time in question.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 03:18 AM
10

If the authorities refuse, sue the state. You need the state's permission to sue it.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:42 AM
3

Honestly, it might be best not to, as that's inviting a hell of a lawsuit, and police harassment.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:14 AM
1

All I'm seeing is Hillary asking someone to print out an e-mail she received, and then logging said request. I really don't see the issue here.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:36 AM
12

So the solution to these horrible, horrible cespools cis-pools of rape and mysoginy is to.... force women to be inside of said cespools?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 10:25 AM
5

It looks at the leftmost column of pixels of every picture (of the right size) on the page, and selects the most "dynamic" picture based on that left column.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 05:22 PM
1

I'm guessing, judging by the sidebar it's A(something) Middle School.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:11 AM
2

Wow, you did a good job on this. It's a response from a very different angle than I would have, but it gets important points across. (Different points than I usually try to stick, but important ones nevertheless)
/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:47 PM
1

Your flair seems to have been changed back to female. Was this your doing, or did the mods realize their error?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:44 PM
1

He spoke to police. NEVER TALK TO POLICE. Great advice for the US, where your silence cannot be used against you. He was in the UK, where the accused don't have that right.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:28 AM
1

Where is Rupert Grint now? Driving around a truck, luring children in with promises of sweets.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:24 AM
5

To be completely fair, this is a company saying "We aren't doing anything wrong." The level of potential bias in a company investigating themselves is staggering.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:09 AM
8

As she is someone who attempted to use violence on someone for questioning feminism, her being punished for such is appropriate for this sub.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:20 PM
3

Honestly, I don't think this is either a bad thing, OR caused by feminism. Most people have preferences in pornography, and the market adapts accordingly. As long as no person or animal is harmed in the production of the pornography, why is it's existence bad? edit oh my god, how the fuck did I forget to say the word "no" in that last sentence. facepalm
/r/MensRights24/01/16 11:21 PM
3

Communism is something VERY specific: when the government controls the means of production. What the article is suggesting is a form of socialism.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 01:15 AM
1

To be fair, I just visited r/feminism and r/askfeminists, and there are two posts on each of them about cologne.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 02:15 PM
1

People certainly want work as a garbageman. Why in NYC, there were ~90,000 applicants, for ~500 positions.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:02 PM
0

Your parents don't approve of him, doesn't make it a rape. Unless you're <18 and >16. Yay confusing AOC laws.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:18 PM
1

Coal miners and garbage men are actually REALLY high paying jobs for how much skill is required. Construction worker wages aren't bad either. Truck driving is kinda all over the place.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:12 PM
3

Each of the things you listed is it's own issue, so we shouldn't lump them all together when talking about them, so I'll answer each one individually. Men committing suicide more often than women. There are two distinct issues at play here. Most of the reasons men want to commit suicide is from societal influence. However, men are more likely to be successful in suicide, and this I attribute to men's brains looking for more efficient means. Women receiving custody more often than men. Mostly a s…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:42 AM
1

Tampons have a 20% tax, many other toiletries have a 5.5% tax.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:31 PM
1

Are there government programs that are less important than a tax on tampons? Honestly, yes, there are. There are some SERIOUSLY wasteful programs in the US.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:29 PM
0

COMPSTAT is a series of metrics that many police departments are measured on, and rewarded for good performance with funding. Given that police departments have limited resources, and are rewarded for good COMPSTAT metrics, it stands to reason that police departments would often go for the "low hanging fruit". And with the low probability of followup on a rape accusation turning into a successful prosecution (regardless of actual guilt or not), it is often better financially for police departmen…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:14 PM
-13

If a woman isn’t prepared to make such an allegation in said manner, for whatever reason, she should keep her mouth shut and get on with her life, whether or not she really has been raped. That particular quote strikes me as extremely callous, especially since some police departments have a perverse incentive to NOT follow up on rape allegations. The police are the best solution the majority of the time, but when the police themselves are in question (especially if the accused is a high ranking …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:26 PM
1

Nope. That's not what a strict liability law does.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:31 AM
2

I would be somewhat confused, but I'd listen to the employee that told me to leave. I am also baffled that you think I am a liar and/or tool for respecting people's property rights.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:19 AM
2

No, that's not what it means at all. It means belief of having a right to something. I believe that if I go to the grocery store with enough money, I'll probably be able to buy a bag of rice. However, being able to buy that bag of rice isn't a right of mine, it's up to the cashier. I recognize that I can probably buy the bag of rice, but I also recognize that I'm not entitled to be able to buy the bag of rice.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:22 AM
7

Just as homosexual men don't chose to be not attracted to women, men who aren't attracted to overweight women don't choose to be that way.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 05:47 PM
1

This is a terrible analogy that attempts to oversimplify the questions people have about consent, by only displaying black and white examples. I'd love to see some examples where problems arise from having too strict of a definition of consent. Here's one I just thought of. "Golly gee, I sure would like some tea to wash down that beer I just had. I love having tea after a beer." "NO! You don't ACTUALLY want tea, that's just the beer talking. Since you've had beer, I'm going to automatically over…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:51 PM
13

Was it required when you first enrolled? If not: complain that they are changing the graduation requirements retroactively.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:43 PM
3

Usually, this is true. However, it's not always the case. If it's the first testing site that's the chimera, then a new testing site will likely fix the problem. HOWEVER, if the testicles are the chimera, then it won't matter whether it's a mouth swab or a blood sample, both will show "not the father"
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:19 AM
2

Does anyone have a mirror to the picture?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:03 PM
3

Eh, I disagree. There is a massive difference between endorsement, and residing on school property.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:59 PM
2

Yes, they do, here is the post that got me banned, as well as my message to the mods afterwards, which I did not receive a response to. https://imgur.com/fXhgpOF
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:23 AM
1

Sounds like a modest proposal.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:27 PM
7

Seeing as the post was deleted, here is the text from the post. My children's father has advised me that, when the state begins garnishing his wages to pay the child support I've sought, he will kill himself. He is completely serious about this as he feels that paying this money will cause his life to fall apart (for various reasons) and he is unwilling to pick up the pieces again. He does not have a relationship with my children (but does play father to two children from a previous marriage and…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:16 AM
1

Well, it largely depends if the man is listed on the birth certificate. Permission to do a DNA test is required from a legal guardian of the child.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:49 PM
14

Here is how I see it. MRAs, MGTOWs, and RPs all agree on one thing: The game is rigged in at least some areas against men, so to speak. However, where we differ is how we react to that. MRAs wish to fix the broken parts of the game. MGTOWs simply decide to not play the game. RPs decide to be that power-gaming cheeseball who abuses the rules of the game, abiding by the letter, but not the spirit of the rules.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 08:16 PM
7

Peer review is incredibly important to the scientific process. And peer review only works correctly when people are applauded for overturning other research with their own. However, in many social sciences, the exact opposite happens. This simple fact turns the scientific method into just a big circlejerk.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:48 AM
6

It does deal with that movie. In a nutshell, a guy who runs Return of Kings, who himself dissassociates with MRAs, and most MRAs dissassociate with him, said MadMax should be boycotted because of it's overly feminist leaning plot.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:06 AM
1

I've seen this graph before, and I have no idea what I'm looking at. The X axis is obvious enough, but the Y axis makes little to no sense.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:18 AM
1

Assault is the threat of force. Battery is the USE of force. It seems that battery is far more applicable here than assault. But it is fairly common for police to drop some of the charges if they don't think they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:11 AM
-5

Even so, it's pretty hard to have charges lead to a conviction if the victim is actively working against the prosecution.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 07:00 AM
1

This sub ... its to discuss and promote men's issues WITHOUT criticising or minimising women's issues. This sub is to discuss the victims of workplace hazards without criticizing the workplace!
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:08 PM
11

Soft pornography depicts people wearing little if any clothing while hard pornography involves harsh and violent depictions of women of a sexual nature. Huh, so there's no such thing as hardcore gay porn? Good to know.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:44 PM
1

I don't see the problem with this. A consenting adult should be allowed to meet with a doctor for cosmetic surgical options. It also specifically says that condoms are still required.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 08:41 PM
-9

No, I am a senior in CS. I am quite aware of what programming entails nowadays. I'm also aware of what it used to entail. It used to be that there weren't off the shelf programs to do stuff like accounting, so those had to be made. And writing an accounting program isn't too terribly difficult.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:54 PM
-12

Not quite. There was an era in the late 60s/early 70s where women were the plurality of computer programmers. This was well after the era of "I foresee a market for maybe five computers worldwide." While computers were well outside the price range for personal possession, computers were something that a business might have one or two of to handle payroll, or stuff like that. Given that you are talking about the ZX81, which was released in 81, your experiences are significantly after this time pe…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:24 PM
5

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/computer-programming-used-to-be-womens-work-718061/?no-ist While early computing, when computers were big expensive machines that took up entire rooms was mostly male, there was a significant point when computing was looked at as secretarial work.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 09:56 PM
1

Transparency in a court system is incredibly important. What is the difference between a trial at a secret court, and a court that operates as you suggest?
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:17 PM
6

She claims she did not agree to be shown in a video used to make a profit. So, she likely DID sign one, but believes that the video went outside of the scope of the contract.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:09 AM
9

Although a tragic occurrence, I fail to see the relevance to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:19 AM
12

Don't demean her based on her appearance. What you are doing is the equivalent of calling someone a virgin neckbeard to argue your point.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 01:47 PM
4

"Hey I've had like eight beers, could you use my car and drive me home?" "No, you're drunk, you couldn't POSSIBLY want to lend me your car, that's just the alcohol talking."
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:22 PM
1

Interesting, do you have a source?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:50 PM
14

Eh, the poster seems to be implying that the age of consent should be lowered. That is a reasonable argument. I admit, I haven't read up on this case. Did the boy in this case assent? I know at 15, he is too young for any assent to be consent.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:43 PM
1

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:12 PM
2

Indeed. Lack of dissent does not imply consent. Although dissent can certainly help ambiguity dissipate.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:48 PM
3

Mens rights is about trying to fix a broken system. TRP is about trying to manipulate the broken system for your personal benefit.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:49 AM
1

The problem with rape victims not having to pay child support is it gives a financial incentive to accuse someone of rape. I'll be honest, I'm not sure which is worse. Victims having to pay their rapist, or giving extra reasons to accuse people of rape.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:46 PM
1

Wow, I was all with this reporter until she insinuated that elections don't matter.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:45 AM
4

Not quite. She went to the police originally, and then the police dropped the investigation due to lack of evidence. She then claimed that she asked the investigation to be pulled to avoid trauma.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:18 AM
0

Honestly, after reading the posts he made, I disagree with the ruling. Saying that you're not going to rest until someone is dying? Responding to a protective order with "Is it thick enough to stop a bullet?" Those are direct threats. And it is reasonable for anyone, male or female, to feel in danger when someone says those.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter