TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tireless_AlphaFox Archive

View 14 posts and 520 comments by Tireless_AlphaFox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
534

humorTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 02:05 PM
352

DiscriminationTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:33 AM
326

ProgressTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:39 AM
163

discussionTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 01:30 AM
151

articleTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 04:14 AM
131

articleTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 04:44 AM
126

articleTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/25 05:42 AM
84

double standardsTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/25 04:33 PM
84

discussionTireless_AlphaFox/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 02:33 PM
46

GeneralTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights11/03/25 05:01 PM
38

IntactivismTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights29/04/25 08:28 AM
33

DiscriminationTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights20/03/25 10:11 AM
22

GeneralTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:17 PM
0

GeneralTireless_AlphaFox/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:35 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

interesting study. First time learning this
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 08:46 AM
0

to be fair, she was wheelchair-dependent
/r/MensRights19/05/25 04:07 AM
41

Yes, generally, people have more sympathy toward women than men. Big media capitalize off it and, in the process, encourage it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 12:14 AM
6

I don't think either is necessarily relevant to one's value. If you really want to make "logic always over emotion", a personal signature of yours, you can. I just don't think it is necessary
/r/MensRights12/05/25 12:30 AM
2

They're unaware
/r/MensRights10/05/25 05:43 AM
3

God, they're evidence is "if she actually sexually harassed people, how could her performance rating be "exceed expectations"" These people are insane
/r/MensRights10/05/25 05:39 AM
26

your ignorance is the only thing wrong here. Maybe you should try to listen to the other side and realize you're not always right
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/25 05:00 AM
1

yeah, it doesn't make sense at all. Just a few months ago, britain passed a new law about the defendants sending the judge reports on their personal lives before being sentenced(or the whole court process. I can't remember). While it is obviously a good thing as it encourages judges to empathize with the person they're sentencing(one of the major factor of sentencing disparity is the judges lack of empathy for men), people on this sub just went crazy on how it makes men secondary citizens while …
/r/MensRights07/05/25 02:17 AM
3

It’s mensrights tho, it’s becoming more antiwomen than pro man every day, and these guys find ways to justify it. Yeah, I can feel the sub changing bit by bit. This place was so much healtheir back then. Now, I see people talking about women shouldn't be allowed to work and polygamy being the ultimate societal structure.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:57 AM
3

Yeah, I thought I was going to see some actual data and factual reporting when I click into the title. It was somewhat disappointing at first, but then I was so shocked by the leap of logic in the post that I found it kinda funny
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:41 AM
3

there are studies showing men also have homicidal fantasies (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/016230959390019E). According to this, supposedly every 7 out of 10 men have considered killing someone. Do you think that's the case around you? If not, why would it be the case for women? Homicidal fantasy is a common thing. It does mean that people would consider killing other people as a legit option. It's not how fantasy works.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:22 AM
3

This is crazy. It's my first time seeing people using data like this. First, homicidal fantasy is a common thing, there are research showing that most people have them at some point of their life. Second, homicidal fantasy does not translate to committing homicide. According to your logic, 76% of all women have committed some form of homicide before. It is insane. I've never seen the tiktok(since I don't use social media), but to say it caused thousands of death, you gotta show some evidence. Ye…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 12:46 AM
-1

Double standard on what?
/r/MensRights06/05/25 11:02 PM
-14

No, you should start caring about mens' rights
/r/MensRights06/05/25 04:57 PM
-40

Wow wow wow, am I in mensright sub or misogyny sub? But like seriously, the article has nothing to do with mensright, and the comment section is filled with the stench of patriarchy
/r/MensRights06/05/25 04:18 PM
2

Thx :D❤️
/r/MensRights03/05/25 05:58 PM
-1

Others' internalized misandary, not op's
/r/MensRights03/05/25 05:58 PM
21

this is internalized misandry. What you feel is not something unique. It is a feeling a lot of people share, and this type of internalized discrimination is not something limited to men. Gay people feel this when their straight friends tell them not to hit on them; Women feel this when their relatives interrogate them for not having children; black people feel this when a white person choose to detour around instead walking past them; etc.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 04:52 PM
3

Both of them are dead or nearly dead in most developed countries with remaining elements of them still existing in societies
/r/MensRights03/05/25 04:17 AM
0

Makes sense. Sucks when it happens
/r/MensRights01/05/25 04:58 AM
1

This makes a lot of sense. I guess it is possible to accidentally stick a penis into someone's ass
/r/MensRights01/05/25 04:55 AM
3

how is it possible to accidentally stick something into someone's ass without consent? I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just curious in how this is possible
/r/MensRights01/05/25 04:17 AM
3

It is possible. Many happened because of plea deals. However, the situation is getting better(not much but more than none) if you look at cases from 20, 30 years ago and compare them with cases in the past 10 years
/r/MensRights01/05/25 12:08 AM
8

This is quite common in many different countries, and it is kinda fucked up
/r/MensRights29/04/25 01:19 AM
20

every evil behavior. I don't think the police should be allowed to just arrest people without evidence
/r/MensRights29/04/25 01:15 AM
1

fat women and ugly women exist
/r/MensRights28/04/25 05:37 PM
3

yeah, she was a total jerk
/r/MensRights28/04/25 03:41 AM
1

The mom was being protective. I can understand that, but she was very rude tho. This is why I don't have conservation with strangers. If I have to talk to strangers, I would mostly talk to other men when I have the chance
/r/MensRights28/04/25 03:35 AM
3

Loyalty, love, emotional support, depending on the type of relationships you're in you may also expect monetary benefit
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:51 PM
31

Gotta say, "believe women" is one of the most retarded thing I've heard. They could've gone for anything, and they chose this. You don't even need to know the context to be weird out by it
/r/MensRights27/04/25 06:06 PM
1

But someone will fuck them if they lower their standards enough. Doesn't the same apply to men as well?
/r/MensRights27/04/25 12:42 PM
0

I dont think that's true. Generally speaking, ugly ladies and fat ladies don't get games
/r/MensRights27/04/25 12:50 AM
-6

I think it's a combination of remaining patriarchy plus toxic feminism. Free market and people earning money through others' misery is not necessarily a problem
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:12 PM
2

I am really sorry for what you went through, and it baffles me how any police would rather arrest a veteran with disabilities. Police, or straight to courts, is probably your only shot if you want to solve this legally. Also, if she ever hits you, you can accuse her of domestic violence
/r/MensRights26/04/25 11:00 AM
4

Calling the police is the standard practice, if you think calling them won't work, how about going to the police station and explaining the situation in person?
/r/MensRights26/04/25 10:11 AM
4

I see. Have you tried calling the police? If she works, have you tried contacting the company she works for?
/r/MensRights26/04/25 09:48 AM
3

How about not hiring a lawyer but just asking one for some legal advice? Some lawyers don't even charge you for it. So might, but the fee is generally manageable
/r/MensRights26/04/25 09:31 AM
2

ask a lawyer would be more helpful than asking some redditors
/r/MensRights26/04/25 09:03 AM
1

Both can be true. It's an attack on nation and a discrimination against men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/25 05:04 AM
3

Yeah, and I think there are great progress being made here, but we have to continue moving forward
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:33 AM
1

Yeah, I really hope it's just people over-reacting
/r/MensRights26/04/25 03:41 AM
3

Incel is exclusively for men? Ever heard of femcel?
/r/MensRights26/04/25 03:15 AM
-19

Oh that's so great to hear. Although I don't think this is on topic with this sub, I'm just terrified about the whole Poilievre situation.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:35 PM
-1

Not an American, no idea if it is true or not
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:50 PM
6

Sorry, the word "militant" was the one used in the article
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 05:37 AM
10

Yeah, I agree with you. This is horrible, and people are not talking about this aspect of things enough
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:35 AM
3

This situation is awful, man. If I were you, I would ask the school if they could send the daughter of the mother who have a problem to another classroom. They're the one having problems. They should be the one swapping to another classroom
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:54 AM
4

This is an excellent news. This is the progress that people want. The comments here, however, is the problem with this sub. Every time something objectively good happens, people will deny it in the comment. Like, what is wrong with you people. How is anything going to be any better if every progress and every step is being attacked for no reason?
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:44 AM
0

yeah
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:32 AM
-1

When I read the title, I thought the situation is the opposite. Anyway, that father deserved it. The government was protecting the child, and that is all there is to it. You can be a Christian without hating on your kid's identity. That father should've been a better person
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:30 AM
1

I think the thing that we gloss over is how many times would we pick a female friend over a male friend if we had exactly the same hobbies as well as interests in discussing and collaborating in said hobby. Most of us have male friends over women friends because they're easier to talk to and have the same level of care about a topic or interest. Exactly! However, I do want to add that some of us just don't want to be labeled as a creep or whatever for trying to have a conversation, and men gener…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:25 AM
1

I don't think most men are defined by their construct of masculinity. I, for example, is defined by my left-leaning political view. I won't see myself this way, but this is how others see me. To others, we are all defined by other defining features. For some people, it might be their masculinity. For some other people, it's some other things.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:21 AM
1

I've met like one man who acts the way you decribed, and I kept as much distance as possible. I can't really create a generalized image of men I know, but if I have to, I would describe them as "having their own things going on, so we only hang out when we all have time"
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:18 AM
5

There was once my friend and I liked the same lady(I was in college). I refused to compete, so I told him to go for it and pulled out. Eventually, they did not work out, but I stayed out of it
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:02 AM
1

I won't accuse you of it, but using the right term and not misgendering people is better
/r/MensRights24/04/25 06:05 AM
1

you were misgendering the person you were talking about.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 05:41 AM
0

I do agree they should probably not use the term womensplain. But you don't need to be so aggressive
/r/MensRights24/04/25 05:14 AM
5

Never interacted with a trans-men before, so no. But if someone likes to nag about shit, I would consider this person quite annoying
/r/MensRights24/04/25 05:13 AM
19

I think we should all post this article around to rise awareness. What do you think?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 04:45 AM
18

It's a reuter's article. I'll post it on some news subs
/r/MensRights24/04/25 04:19 AM
39

Molesting. Retards yell about how much they want to swap place whenever a man is molested. It is a crime regardless of the gender committing it, but only male victims got told they were lucky
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:17 AM
-4

I feel like it actually makes the society as a whole cares more. Like, in UK, they are planning to hire more male teachers. I won't call it being shunned
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:21 AM
2

I can agree with half of it. Masculinity is inherently neutral. I won't want anything to do with it, but having it is not a toxic thing. In fact, I think my way of thinking is just the general consensus around masculinity. The toxic kind is toxic, the normal kind is normal
/r/MensRights22/04/25 07:58 PM
3

It was a vocal, deliberately loud insult for no reason. That wouldn't bother you? It does. I never claimed it won't, and I never claimed it is something polite to do. Those women were being very rude and childish.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 11:06 AM
4

You can say that to them. Nobody's gonna stop you. They're just going to post their version of your post on their reddit sub. And by no meaning, I mean the word does not carry any actual information else than they're mean. Also, you asked me what makes holding a door open toxic masculinity. I don't know and have no idea. My best would be infantilization("what? You think women can't even open the door?"), but I really don't know They were the one who said it, and they decided that you were toxic …
/r/MensRights21/04/25 10:49 AM
18

I think everyone has their own definition and range for toxic masculinity. It's like calling people a nazi, libtard, etc. There is no real meaning behind this phrase
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:18 AM
3

You're strong, man. To go through all those, you must have a strong heart. I hope things went well for you afterward
/r/MensRights21/04/25 02:55 AM
3

Ah, women blaming all men for what an individual did, a story as old as time itself
/r/MensRights21/04/25 02:44 AM
2

Vilar was not an American
/r/MensRights20/04/25 03:43 AM
2

Were in you Germany in 1970? Vilar was a German, and I was talking about Germany, which had a 9:1 ratio in the gender of the teachers in 1970.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 03:41 AM
1

I can vaguely agree with the societal framwork part. However, I really dislike the way the narrative time jumps between 1970 and modern days. In Vilar's time, there was no social media and teachers were predominant men. I think it would be better if the youtuber's own opinions and Vilar's opinions are clearly separated so we don't misunderstand what Vilar was trying to say
/r/MensRights20/04/25 01:49 AM
6

Not irl but like 80% of the times on reddit
/r/MensRights18/04/25 10:17 AM
0

Why would people think you're a fool for telling the person to use the hanging loop?
/r/MensRights17/04/25 11:17 PM
-2

I don't really see huge problem here. It's just kinks. It's like men talking about their wives giving them blowjobs. It's just people sharing their "playstyle" on the internet
/r/MensRights16/04/25 12:16 AM
16

I personally think that classrooms(in elementary schools) with strict class rules are very harmful to young boys' development. They are kids, and they deserve to run around and do frolic things. Making them sit and listen to standardized lecture is really not a good thing for their mental development
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:32 PM
6

good!
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:30 PM
-3

Far-right people being insecure. Is that really a surprise?
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:06 PM
-6

When half of your country is obssessed with having a dictator as your leader, it is what happens. I know how much of an asshole I sound, but it is my true thought. I don't want to pin it on American people, but you guys really fucked up
/r/MensRights13/04/25 03:37 PM
54

I really don't think people should be searched for their browser history.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 02:58 PM
1

UK is crazy for it. In US, most dv shelters are not gendered. In Canada, some are, some aren't, but I believe most are female-only
/r/MensRights12/04/25 02:32 AM
-4

I don't know. Petplay is quite a common kink between both genders
/r/MensRights11/04/25 08:34 AM
0

you are a weird person. Fighting against slavery is good. Slavery is bad. Not sure how you can not grasp an idea as simple as this
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:24 AM
-10

People don't just grow out of toxicity. Fighting against toxicity and debating around toxicity is a necessary for addressing and changing toxic behaviors. The alternative to what happened in OP's post is not "Women not talking about men like they were pets in the first place." The alternative is them not talking about it in public, and the problem never getting addressed. It's naive to just hope that bad things don't happen. Bad things have already happened, and it is only healthy to push agains…
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:02 AM
16

I don't think I'd mind
/r/MensRights11/04/25 02:12 AM
-27

can you read more than a sentence?
/r/MensRights11/04/25 01:49 AM
-39

I think this is healthy "Someone did something that can be considered offensive" -> "People who got offended call the action out" -> "People having a conversation about the sensitivity of the topic" This is how social norms form. The more it happen, the less it will happen in the future
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:24 AM
13

Most of the time, it's just people with fragile masculinity/feminity feeling like your feminity is attacking their identity. I pity them for how shaky their ego are built on, and I suggest you not to worry about them.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:06 PM
5

I hope you can find a less toxic environment so you can show your emotions
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:04 PM
1

Well, that's very different from my experience. Most of the women in their 20s around me and most women i their 20s on reddit seem to be into men in their 30s. Also, I think most of the data from related studies show that women are generally more into men in their 30-40
/r/MensRights10/04/25 10:59 AM
1

I see what you're trying to say, but "it’s insinuated that there’s something wrong with a man who does it" is a bit to the extreme.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 07:42 AM
2

Perhaps, I don't know. I know now IT and engineering are not traditionally female's studies, but who knows about the future. However, I do think that it won't be the case in the upcoming decade.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 06:55 AM
4

Yawn. Even when I was in Primary school, 1/3rd of the teachers (not including the senior staff) were male. By 2016 this had collapsed to 10-11% of the total number of Primary teachers in my state. It’s only been in the last half century that it’s become increasingly female dominated (as happens with everything except linesman, sewer workers and garbage collectors). Same here, the only female teacher I can remeber having when I was a high schooler was my history teacher. It’s grossly dishonest or…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 06:17 AM
2

tradition is a relative term. It can refer to different time period in different context
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:43 AM
10

It might be the case. It might not. But, I'd much rather celebrate the progress of men getting public support for entering a traditional female-dominated job market. This is the equality we need, and it seems like we are getting it
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:00 AM
-5

Not sure what you're on about, but aren't middle-aged men considered the most attractive world wide
/r/MensRights08/04/25 11:59 AM
-6

I know the "you're perfect," "treat yourself like a queen," "no one will love you more than yourself," etc type of sayings. What's wrong with them? "Men are trash" is an evil statement, but what's wrong with the other part. Those are just common advertisement slogans companies use to sell women useless products. They are so successful in selling the idea to women that this type of idea gets ingrained into culture, but I fail to see how they are wrong or bad in any way.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 09:56 AM
0

you can literally pull straight out of most female orinted day time TV shows like the view Like what? Also, the reason people complain about women on those podcast are dumb is because they can not defend their opinions. Those podcasters are experienced and prepared while the women are just random ladies on the street or paid actors. Of course those women get destroyed in a real debate. On the internet, behind the keyboards, we can spend minutes to construct our thoughts. We can tell that those w…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 05:27 AM
13

The thing is, those women in those podcasts are not representative of women as a gender. In fact, no individual is representative of a group. The idea that those podcasts would lose in the debate if they invited a smarter woman is the most default statement ever. It's the same as "not all men are rapists," "not all white guys are racists," "not all black vote blue," etc. "not all women are that stupid" is just one variation of these statements. Some people call these statements bullshit. I don't…
/r/MensRights07/04/25 03:19 AM
8

I can not agree more. This is why I always tell kids who ask me advice on this, "Why be masculine or feminine when you can be yourself." Societal expectation on personalities, identities, and achievements has to be poison hardest to get rid off
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 05:50 PM
4

askmenadvice actually asks its users to use flairs to show if they are men or women so that you can tell if it is actually a man who's answering your questions
/r/MensRights06/04/25 04:57 PM
-3

What's wrong with it? I use the "man" flair there to show I am a man. I honestly don't see a downside to asking people their pronouns. Not sure why you're so aggressive about it
/r/MensRights06/04/25 04:55 PM
20

You got some pretty bad friends not gonna lie. To me, the golden rule is that I only comment on women's body when there's no women around, and if women comment on men's body while I'm around, I would call them out
/r/MensRights04/04/25 01:40 AM
-18

Oriental fantasy/fetish
/r/MensRights04/04/25 01:06 AM
32

Let's see how more male teachers is going to help the situation. I'm actually curious on how it will turn out. However, I do wonder how they are going to just spawn a bunch of male teachers ready to work.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 01:26 PM
1

Well, I don't think men spend time thinking about periods often, but I'm sure women certainly do. If that's the difference we are talking about, I can understand
/r/MensRights02/04/25 12:36 AM
1

Again, a small difference like that has huge implications on a complex system like the human brain. The different sizes of the different areas, the composition of the brain, the white matter / grey matter ratios... those things do add up and probably compound logarithmically over billions of neurons firing in different number of sequences and numbers. The thing is that it just doesn't work that way. The size of a part of a brain does not imply how developed or how good someone is in a certain ar…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:21 PM
1

You see, people's brain develop according to the way we are educated and the way we choose to live our lives(neuroplasticity). The inferior-parietal lobule you mentioned are significantly more developed among people in STEM programs than other people. It reflects in gray matter density, and this difference between the two groups actually grows larger with age. This is called neuroplasticity, and it is how our brain works. The problem with all these research is that they are already affected by t…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:37 PM
-1

No, not really. All your cognitive functions happen in your prefrontal lobe. You don't use your occipital or amygdala to think. I'm not sure how to explain this, but specific parts of your brain do specific things. Having a more developed amygdala might make you more tempered, but your cognitive function is not affected by it. I am not arguing against science. I am saying that science does not work that way. Having more gray matter in your brain doesn't make you like barbie dolls, and having big…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 03:15 PM
-6

I believe sugar mommies exist, no?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:48 PM
1

It's my first time seeing the paradox. I'll look into it
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:45 PM
-1

Both sources talk about the difference in brain structure. None of them actually talks about how men and women think differently. The difference in brain structure does not imply the difference in actual thinking
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:32 PM
-2

Your swedish research also states that when raised equally more women chose more feminine jobs like nursing etc Which is the effect of a gendered society. Those kids, even though learning in a non-gendered environment, are still forced to interact with the gendeIred world outside of their classroom. I know the women have more gray matter argument and things along those lines. Those are just observations of brain activity, they barely explains how brain actually functions. We are talking about wa…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:15 AM
-6

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/24/world/europe/sweden-gender-neutral-preschools.html Sure, there can be involvement of nature, but nurture is the biggest factor in affecting how a person think and act. The research about female brain and male brain has long being busted and proven incorrect
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:52 AM
3

I agree with you mostly, but I will say OP is like 90% bullshit
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:54 AM
2

just by the way, where can you find this show?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:35 AM
3

very interesting project, will check it out
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:32 AM
2

This entire article just shouts narrative and lack of reasoning The Family Unit: The First Casualty of War This entire section contains no reason, no evidence, but narrative. There is literally zero thing worth discussing in this section. It's simply a narrative that winds people into your story. Call someone a sexist, a bigot, or an incel, and suddenly, their opinion doesn’t matter. Let me just add a few names into the list: libtard, conservatard, tankie, nazi, trumptard, woke, etc. Do you see …
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:00 AM
4

hahahaha I'm comparing to actual left wing places like here in the UK or you know, the rest of western Europe or Canada or Australia or New Zealand lol So you see the thing here. This place is leftwing in the context of US politics, and you're bitching about it because other places are more progressive? Well, of course some places are more progressive than others. I don't see how those countries should be the standard of left and right for an app(reddit) that's mostly based in US. your country i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 06:08 PM
2

Reddit is a pretty US-centric app. I dont see it basing its left and right on US being a problem due to how subjective it is. You say it is not left wing by any other standards in the world, but that's just you gaslighting yourself. You are literally comparing this sub with all the middle east theocracies, east asian fake democracies, indian caste system, african forced labor and warlords. In what world standard is this sub not left-leaning? Or, are you only considering a small portion of Europe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 05:45 PM
6

They just hated feminism so much they were willing to choose the worst option and suffer together
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 09:20 AM
2

These organizations are the ones that make this dark world a bit brighter
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:18 AM
3

I believe feminism has been radicalized and taken over by women who fear and hate men. And the majority of non-radicalized feminists do not oppose that in any way. I believe they see it as a tool in a zero sum game that they use to extract more benefits for women at the expense of men. "A job taken away from a man is a job for a woman", "for every skipped by promotoion man theres a promoted woman" and that sort of thinking. I don't think most feminists hold this type of thinking. I think most of…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 05:33 AM
2

views on feminism, women(the two are separate subjects), british policies, judicial system, habituation vs punishment, etc
/r/MensRights31/03/25 02:54 AM
1

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates and r/MensLib are more left-leaning than here. Also, since those subs have heavy sensorship on posts, so there are more positive posts there. Also, those subs have less crazy social darwinists, redpillers, and all. I also recommend r/AskMenAdvice for less politic-oriented posts(for example, intactivism, education gap, male rape victim neglect, etc) if you are only interested in the topic of dating
/r/MensRights31/03/25 01:02 AM
-1

oh that one. I thought it's the one deleted. I think she's just a tourist who got here because of homepage feed or something along that line. I got a lot of feminist things in my homepage feed, too. So I wouldn't be surprised
/r/MensRights31/03/25 12:09 AM
2

Not really, I actively support most of the advocacy for men's rights, including intactivism and more. I do disagree with most of the philosophical discussions here, but I am a part of what the sub is supposed to cater to
/r/MensRights31/03/25 12:07 AM
16

Toxicity is really just a buzz word to fuel hatred into the gender war
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 11:22 PM
3

Can you give an example?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:06 PM
-5

I think the person deleted their comments? Well, I see what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 10:58 PM
-20

Can you show some examples? I often just click on those that are in my feed. By my own experience, I don't think I saw any post that was posted by feminists or other things along that line
/r/MensRights30/03/25 02:08 PM
1

The support of the likes of Rogan and Petersen would just indicate to them they’ve got them in the bag and don’t have to do anything. I wouldn't say that. I think it can be explained either way. "Those incels won't vote for us anyway, why care?" vs "well, since they're already voting for us, why care?" I personally think the latter can not be true, because to this day, democrats are still catering toward minorities like black people, even though they certainly have them in their bag. I don't thi…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 05:15 PM
2

Yeah, they don't really know how to cater to male audience yet. I hope they can learn how to do it before the next US election
/r/MensRights29/03/25 05:04 PM
1

I won't say that's the case. Most of those politicians, and rich businesspeople, don't really have a strong love/hate thing like most of us. Most of them only see this world through benefits/threats. Just take a look at Rubio, can you believe he campaigned against Trump before the election?
/r/MensRights29/03/25 05:03 PM
4

I dont think that's the case. Unless you're a brainwashed misandrist, you don't hate men, and that's the case for most people. Even those politicians, they don't hate men. It's just that gender wars benefit them and ignoring male suffering helps with the gender war.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:11 PM
9

Although I am doubtful, but it was a possibility: Democrats, before the election, got desperate and finally decided to begin campaigning to get more male voters. I hope it is the reality we live in, but no. We are still ignored by most of the political parties in most of the first world countries
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:09 PM
24

Fr fr. It feels like that "I like pancakes. So you hate waffles" meme most of the time when you try to talk about these things with people. "I think male suicide rate is too high. So you don't care about women who offed themselves?" What? No. It's just that male's suicide rate is higher, and it might indicate some societal factors that are disproportionately harmful toward men. So many people, they just assume you are a redpiller or misogynist when you bring this type if things up
/r/MensRights29/03/25 02:33 AM
0

No, I am saying he told you to hate women. I never said you hate women.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:21 PM
0

He was literally telling you to hate women last post
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:16 PM
8

Interesting take. I myself either watch free ones or buy the those that are produced by my fellow men, let them be game devs, painters, or writers. I enjoy supporting fellow men in porn industry
/r/MensRights28/03/25 12:35 PM
1

This is crazy
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:20 AM
4

marriage is just not a good idea in this day and age.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:55 AM
1

fr fr
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:55 AM
4

People hold prejudice against things they don't know enough about
/r/MensRights28/03/25 12:50 AM
-7

Yeah, but I don't think the man sued her for it. I also think she has a case to argue she got a misinformation effect (victims recalling the experience of the crime inaccurately. Like remembering black cars as red cars, recalling faces of the suspects yet had never since the person before, etc)
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:25 PM
-9

That's what I've been saying. You moved your goal post so much that you land it right in mine
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:41 PM
4

He asked the woman if his dick was big enough. It was recorded by the CCTV,
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:37 PM
5

thx for the validation. It is sweet, and it made my day. such fact-checking is dully needed if we wish to have a more informed and solid message as a community. I can not agree more
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:26 PM
-45

He pleaded guilty, but that’s nothing, who knows what he was promised for doing so, and even if he did do something that rises to the level of sexual harassment, that could be almost literally anything and can easily arise from a misunderstanding. Except we do, the man asked the woman if his dick was big enough and got his voice recored by the CCTV. https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/court_and_police/134238/man_pleads_guilty_to_verbally_harassing_woman_who_was_hiking_in_urrieq_ The article OP pr…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:25 PM
3

I read your source again. I saw no mentioning of audio
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:22 PM
6

https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/court_and_police/134238/man_pleads_guilty_to_verbally_harassing_woman_who_was_hiking_in_urrieq_ I just typed the man's name into the search bar. It is the second source to pop up
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:20 PM
5

I dont know. Maybe the man sued her, maybe not
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:14 PM
18

Definitely. People in this post can not read, man
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:11 PM
6

no, the woman, who claimed to be flashed, got sexually harrassed by the man. The man asked her if his dick was big enough, and that is what he was guilty of. The woman lied about the flashing part, but the "big enough" part was recorded by the CCTV, so the man was still charged with sexual harrassment
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:10 PM
4

no, the woman, who claimed to be flashed, got sexually harrassed by the man. The man asked her if his dick was big enough, and that is what he was guilty of. The woman lied about the flashing part, but the "big enough" part was recorded by the CCTV, so the man was still charged with sexual harrassment
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:10 PM
7

the journalist did. The man asked the woman if his dick was big enough. It's just that the journalist did not do a good job in highlighting the difference between it and the falsely claimed one. Here is a segment from another source The court heard how on 11 March, a woman informed the police station that while she was walking on a trail in Ħal Safi leading to Żurrieq, a man allegedly pulled down his trousers and asked her if his private part “is big enough”. Defence lawyer Charles Mercieca told…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:07 PM
-12

OP left out a part of the article. When Degabriele appeared before Magistrate Giannella Camilleri Busuttil, he pleaded guilty to subjecting the woman to an act with sexual connotations but not to revealing his genitals to her. Degabriele, who was also out of three sets of bail, was allowed to go home pending sentencing which is scheduled for Thursday at 2pm. Degabriele is the man's name. So, he was harrassing this woman. He just did not pull off his pants. He still harrassed the woman. He just d…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:55 PM
-123

OP intentionally left out a part of the story. When Degabriele appeared before Magistrate Giannella Camilleri Busuttil, he pleaded guilty to subjecting the woman to an act with sexual connotations but not to revealing his genitals to her. Degabriele, who was also out of three sets of bail, was allowed to go home pending sentencing which is scheduled for Thursday at 2pm. Degabriele is the man's name. So, no, the woman was the victim here
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:50 PM
12

Not to be a jerk, but I do want to condemn OP for not posting the entire story. Here is the part that OP left out: When Degabriele appeared before Magistrate Giannella Camilleri Busuttil, he pleaded guilty to subjecting the woman to an act with sexual connotations but not to revealing his genitals to her. Degabriele, who was also out of three sets of bail, was allowed to go home pending sentencing which is scheduled for Thursday at 2pm. Degabriele is the man's name
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:49 PM
-223

To be fair, the woman was the victim here, and not naming the victim is just proper journalist behavior. If the man sue the woman over her false claim, that would be another deal
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:44 PM
142

This type of behavior needs to be punished. Defamation is a huge deal. Even though the man did commit sexual harassment, the female victim still lied about the process.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:42 PM
2

Fr fr. A bunch of stakeless internet users is not going to spit anything useful whatsoever. However, I do understand that some people just don't have people irl to talk about these types of things, so my golden rule is to be as caring as possible
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:53 PM
5

I dont know. I dont really enjoy having people talking about my penis in public
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:35 PM
9

There are a lot of very cruel people on internet. The truth is, most of us do not think about how our words can affect others when we're online, especially on reddit
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:30 PM
18

I think OP is talking about reddit, not this sub specifically, although I won't recommend anyone to talk about that on this sub anyway
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:29 PM
1

Where was it deleted?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:31 AM
3

yeah, that's why we need to promote empathy and care in the society, especially between men, so that we can overcome this patriarchal mindset
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:39 AM
18

Weak men allowed all this nonsense to happen What? How? Isn't it, strong men decide not to give a shit about weak men?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:04 AM
38

men should be more active in calling this type of behavior out. The more we oppose, the less women are going to do it. They do this because they are insensitive. They do not perceive talking about dicks as a social taboo or offensive. The more we oppose, more will realize how insensitive it is, and they will stop
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:55 AM
6

fr fr. I think it's the kind of problems that can only be solved with "be the change you want to see"
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:02 AM
-5

What do you mean by women hobbies? Can you give an example?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:10 AM
9

You are being a very awful person by exploiting other's vulnerability. He shared his experience, looking for support, and you decided to push your own views and narrative onto him. Shame
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:17 PM
7

I know, as a passerby on the internet, I don't qualify, but I do wish you luck in one day finding a person who will be truly proud of you. I also hope you can eventually overcome your fear. No one deserves to live in dread.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:15 PM
37

All love to you. I hope you can find your happiness elsewhere. What you went through was truly unhumane and horrible. I can't even imagine them happening on me. Although you might not think it is the case, but to experience all those and still stay alive is, by itself, an act of bravery and strength. I saw some people on this sub in this post trying to exploit your past and indoctrinate you with their own world view. It's truly disgusting, and it is only hurting you further. I just want you to k…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:09 PM
6

You just described 2 horrible futures that needs to be avoided, and they can only do it by themselves.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 02:32 PM
16

Men in uk have some heavy works to do to improve their country
/r/MensRights26/03/25 12:25 PM
5

"All men" is a very sexist term. Most people do not realize it because they are stuck in the mindset of "men can not be sexually discriminated." It's the same as "white people can't be racially discriminated," and "men can't be victims." The only way out is to break through this mindset and realize the vulnerability of men and the diversity of men. We need to spread awareness
/r/MensRights26/03/25 04:16 AM
6

When it comes to rejection, I think one's upbringing is much more important than one's gender. I feel like I've seen more entitled women than men, but that can just be a bias from my part
/r/MensRights25/03/25 11:04 PM
1

I see I see. I absolutely agree
/r/MensRights25/03/25 11:01 PM
-1

So do we intensely dislike feminist movement, which basically wants us dead, or put in concentration camps, while avoiding any accountability for their actions? Okay, now you're not making any sense. I don't know what happened to you that makes you think this way. I hope you can recover from it. No offense to you personally. I wish everything goes well for you, but you're not making any sense. No one is actually pushing for putting men into concentration camps. There are individuals who want thi…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 01:29 PM
1

Because you are not a bad person? Because hating another group of people is not how human rights movements work?
/r/MensRights25/03/25 01:11 PM
4

I get how it is the case in warfare and battles, but we are civilians living in societies. No human rights movements ended well with fight fire with fire. We should strive for mutual understanding since hatred just cycles back
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:46 AM
1

others being ignorant and refuse to admit the diversity in human behaviors and attitude does not mean you need to comply to ignorance. Why would you choose not to understand others when you can?
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:43 AM
1

Not all women are against approaching. But probably around half of them are. Just bring the topic up with friends, and you will probably find around half will be pro-cold-approach, and half will be anti-cold-approach, both guys and girls. Dating apps have become the new normal, and going up to someone in person is considered weird. Some women find it refreshing-weird, but some find it rude-weird, and a minority will attack you verbally or even legally. I can see it being true. I've not been in t…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:41 AM
3

you know "not all" arguments are actually quite legit, right? Not all white guys are racists, not all men are rapists, not all gays are progressive, etc.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:32 AM
8

When a man pursues a woman in an ethical way, feminists and mainstream society demonize him. If he approaches a woman in a well lit, safe, public place like a cafe, library, gym, or a busy street with lots of shops, he is labeled a creep, no matter how polite he is or how little pressure he puts her under. If he asks out a female friend, he is accused of “ruining the friendship” or faking a friendship just to get in her pants. Is it true. Isn't approaching women in public space still the expecte…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 02:48 AM
1

Things can change. Failure of the past doesn't predict the failure in the future
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 10:54 PM
1

Things can change. Failure of the past doesn't predict the failure in the future
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 10:54 PM
35

interesting article. I don't have a stance on this, but I do agree that some awareness over the situation should be encouraged
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 05:00 PM
7

Sometimes I wonder if UK is literally one of the most sexist countries in EU or we are just getting stuffed with bad news from UK because they also speak English
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:20 PM
0

If you think that's the case, you're welcome. As long as you're satisfied, it's fine
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:55 PM
-5

If you choose to believe patriarchy = men, it's your choice then. I can't help
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:24 PM
-8

That's not true. Some people might tell you that, but it's not true. Some people might advocate for this because they hate men or they have other ulterior motives, but it's not true, and you do not need to do the same to another group as a retaliation. It only continues the cycle of malice. It does nobody(men) any good
/r/MensRights24/03/25 07:24 AM
1

Yeah, let's work toward that goal together
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:52 AM
21

So entitled. I don't think her parents did a good job in raising to be a good person.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:10 AM
0

You see, OP, throughout his reponse to my comments, clearly meant to mean all women in his original post. If he did not mean all women, it would be a different case, but he clearly did. He was generalizing a very negative trait that is against a group of people(men) onto another group of people(women). Even if he did not mean to do it, he was still stirring up men's hate toward women. This method of claiming women can not think logically and are contradictory is a common method used to make men …
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:01 AM
-11

One. I differentiate between “feminists” and “women”. They’re not synonymous. However feminists act as if they are and as if they claim to speak for women in general. Right, I was referring to OP there, not you. Sorry for the miscommunication
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:44 AM
1

You assumed I assumed OP hate women, which is not the case.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:43 AM
-1

you assumed OP is “hating women.” Your argument is great, but you're literallly violating your own rule in the same comment. I get your point. I should've probably use more neutral language in my initial comment, but you should also be more careful about your own assumption.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:17 AM
435

This article is so retarded. The author claims the solution to problems like Andrew Tate is governmental restriction over smartphone usage. It's hard to imagine that an actual journalist with a functioning brain wrote this garbage
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:43 AM
-1

…. You lazily labeled what I said as “hate.” Lazy. I don’t hate women. I was presenting the logical fallacy. I never said you hate women. You don't need to hate women to spread hatred. You present false information that baits people into hating women. My point (that you have missed entirely) is logically, the argument that “the patriarchy hurts men too” doesn’t make any sense. So that's what this post is about? There are so many posts with the identical argument to yours but actually provide rea…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:39 AM
-2

If you really want to talk about value, you should realize that you are the one providing negative value. Hatred toward women as a whole actively undermines the validity of actual claims and advocacies that contribute to men's rights and well-being.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:23 AM
-5

You should understand that in “debates,” between men and women that we all have our own sides. Yes and no. If you're implying that men and women are somehow enemies battling for finite resource, you're not looking at our society and men's struggle the right way. If you're simply saying that each group should advocate for themselves, then yes, and I am contributing to the men side by stopping you from spreading blind and generalized hate. By saying “not all women,” you’re ignoring the essential p…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:20 AM
-2

I am adding value by calling out your bs. Do you realize that spreading hate is not helping men if not turning people away from MRA?
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:15 AM
-3

Here, let me Google that for you…….. https://www.feminists.co/discover/nergizdebaerehttps://chixmag.com/editorial/the-next-phase-of-feminism-is-matriarchy Great, you proved your point. I actually don't know these people exist before. However, my points still stand. If this group of feminist are who you're targetting, target them. Targeting the entire female demographic is not it. Also, hasty generalization has nothing to do with this conversation. Not all women are the same is a factual statemen…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:02 AM
7

I absolutely agree! This is so overlooked, and it is very harmful for the next generation, I believe
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:50 AM
-22

I agree it is quite a common belief among some read radicals. It's still disingenuous to target women as a group for individual beliefs
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:47 AM
-6

Please point to one instance where someone said “we replace the patriarchy with a system that benefits men too.” This is meaningless. I can say it now myself. I can find multiple people claiming it online. That doesn't mean it's true. Also, I can ask you the same thing. Give me one example of someone or group actually influential pushing for a matriarchal society. You are the one with the burden of proof. You need to prove that a matriarchal society is what is being pushed. I do not need to prov…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:43 AM
-31

This is disingenuous. First, the two sentences can be and are often said by different people. Second, women is a massive group of people that shouldn't be generalized(do you really think those conservative-trad-wife women would say either of the two sentences?). Third, there are definitely individuals who say both sentences, but to claim it is somehow a norm or a general thing, you are essentially being the kind of jerk who say "all men are potential rapists." Fourth, this is literally just a ra…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:45 AM
7

Men and women face different problems. It's a classic case of the western world ignoring men's problems while local government refuse to address both. It's such a depressing common situation in Asia that often makes me feel hopeless about the future
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:24 AM
6

This seems really degenerate
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 01:15 AM
-9

I don't disagree with the first image. r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, r/MensLib are certainly much healtheir places than r/MensRights. I would say most people here don't really care about advocating for men's rights. They just want to hate the imaginary enemy in their head, which is a human thing to do, so I don't judge. That said, I do agree that they should've at least burred the usernames before posting.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:13 AM
17

Good. Let's just both give up on marriage. I don't know where this is going to lead us to, but I think we are only going to go upward
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:58 AM
-1

I'm glad people are sensible in the comment section. I get how unfair it feels, but sometimes things happen and you really don't have a choice
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:56 AM
4

Yeah, a lot of misandrists are absolutely coping the shit out of themselves to justify their skewed views
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:28 AM
1

I am guessing you come from an Asian country? In that case, just try not to bother. It is a shared experience by most Asians. It's not really related to men's issues and rights, but I do understand as I also once lived in an Asian country.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:27 AM
6

Well, I guess there is still hope in UK. News like this always bring joy to my heart
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 06:25 AM
2

People here are telling you to win a battle that doesn't exist. I don't think it is very helpful. My honest advice would be to minimize interaction as much as possible and focus on the good part. When you have to talk, always remain calm, understanding, and reasonable. I know it can be hard, especially toward someone you hate, but forgiving and understanding is always worthy of effort. Hatred tortures both your, her, and your kids' minds. The only way out is to stop hating.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:12 AM
3

These people working for the sake of men without every getting the fame and reputation they deserve are the real heroes of modern society.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 05:56 AM
0

The left went nuts with promoting irreversible surgery on minors, which is insane because we don't allow minors to vote or drink or make big decisions. So why would it be a good idea to let them get irreversible genital surgery? So the alternative should be letting the kid live in pain and despise for their own body for 18 or 20 years? Do you know how much it weighs down on a kid's mental health? Sure there are kids with less extreme sufferins, but they aren't the one benefiting from these surge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 05:53 AM
1

The stats are legit. You can choose to pretend they aren't. That's your choice
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:32 AM
1

So you chose to ignore all the data and reasoning I provided? I am not surprised, but it would be better if you do
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:52 PM
0

I've already answered under another comment under my comment. You can find it yourself
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:41 PM
3

You would've thought that criticizing a right wing bill is going to make you appear left wing. I am actually quite curious. What makes you think this sub is not left wing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 07:49 AM
1

I do agree there are heavy bias in criminal courts. UK justice system is very crooked. However, we are talking about kids here
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:12 AM
13

Jesus, it is a horrible thing to happen to a kid
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:40 AM
25

1 in 14 American men experienced made to penetrate. Men can be raped, and it is quite common
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:37 AM
9

They don't. That's why people need to stand up
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:35 AM
-7

Kids get custody sentences for serious violent offenses. I can see how more boys commit this than girls. There may be a bias, don't get me wrong, but I can see it being true. Less than 300 kids in a country with 8 million kids(between age of 10-19) means all the kids can just be outliers. Factoring out how amygdala affects boys brains, gender ratio of the country, and some other cultural factors, I don't think the data is too off
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:35 AM
13

Literally a predator
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:22 AM
5

The one who made the decision to do shits like this needs to be punished by law
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:21 AM
18

This is horrible if true. Also, it has to be illegal
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:20 AM
-12

You did not read the article, did you? They were still sent to youth facilities. Youth prisons have a gender ratio of 98% boys while secure schools(a new type of youth prison made in 2022. If I remembered correctly there are currently 2 secure schools in UK) have a gender ratio of 68% boys. Vulnerable boys do not have their needs ignored, or "stays in prison," as the title claims. Secure schools are still made of a majority of boys. Also, guess how many girls got a custody sentence each year in …
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:18 AM
1

I never noticed it. Perhaps I should pay more attention to the media
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:10 AM
-3

I am sorry for what you went through, but I think we are not on the same topic. Availability heuristics is a thing people experience when they try to measure the quantity of something through their past experience. It often leads to people overestimating the chance of bad things happening. Again, I feel sorry for what you went through, and I hope things went well for you
/r/MensRights21/03/25 06:54 PM
-42

Ah, rage baiting with misleading title. It's the smell of home
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:57 PM
-3

Not at all. Realistically, it has a very low chance of happening to you. Remember, this sub is heavily impacted by cherry-picking. What you are experiencing is called availability heuristic. You can look it up, and you'll understand why you shouldn't be worried about it
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:55 PM
-9

I've never been pressured to praise a woman's appearance and have never seen it happen to anybody, online or irl. If what you said is true, I think the practice is wrong. But I personally have never seen it happening
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:37 AM
-9

well, it's removed by the mods. Perhaps, they agree with your opinion?
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:14 AM
-19

can you give me a link. I sense a strong "some important information are omitted" vibe. Not to say you're making a bad-faith argument. I just want to check
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:00 AM
43

Fr fr
/r/MensRights20/03/25 03:59 PM
1

Justice system has no autonomy or even consciousness. It is a bad line of code written by a shit programer. Shits happen because the code was written badly. The only way solve it is to change the code. If you go out your way to assume that the justice system is somehow trying to achieve something, you fall into the conspiracy theorist hole of chasing after a non-existent enemy. We need to solve the problem, not find someone to blame
/r/MensRights20/03/25 12:21 AM
1

totally agree
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/25 07:36 AM
1

Indeed indeed. I think the more people drift away from dating apps, the quicker we can get out of this situation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/25 07:18 AM
2

I do agree that more virtue is going to make this world a better place
/r/MensRights19/03/25 01:25 AM
-11

Yeah, the article is spot on. I do have some minor criticism over some specific details, but I can get behind this
/r/MensRights19/03/25 12:45 AM
1

Interesting, my counter point is those virtues and good qualities would make you good a friend to many people and people would enjoy your company. I think we still value virtues. It's just that it is not the only thing people look for in relationships, which is reasonable. I do not doubt some people out there is going to want Jesus to be their partners, but I do find my personality not the kind to fit Jesus, so I would have to pass if I were a woman
/r/MensRights19/03/25 12:29 AM
0

I don't think the character Jesus was made to be sexually attractive. I also don't think walking into a bar looking for serious relationship is a smart idea. I've never heard people saying things like you should be more like Jesus, not even from Christians
/r/MensRights19/03/25 12:00 AM
1

I have a friend who's a feminist, the kind that studied gender studies in college. She is against misandry, but she won't go out her way to post anything on her social media. One of reasons is the thing you saw in this post. Nobody likes being cyber bullied. Also, what exactly do you think she can do about those people hating men online? Now, that's just an anecdote around me, but the point I am trying to make here is that people are individuals. Feminists are just scarcely distributed individua…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 02:37 PM
1

You don't know that, and even if they do, they are just individuals. By using a label broader than necessary, you're hitting people who are innocent, and you are pushing people who are neutral or oblivion away from us. It's like calling all Germans Nazis during WWII. Guess what? You just called Schindler a Nazi
/r/MensRights18/03/25 02:06 PM
1

Again, you're just pushing people away from us by calling them feminists. It's like calling a right-leaning centrists Nazi is going to drive them away from the left. It's not going to do you any good. It will only harm mra's public image. Do you think feminists who genuinely have no idea about the existence of online misandry and promote equality for all exist? I think they do, and you pushed them away
/r/MensRights18/03/25 02:03 PM
1

We need to pave the way for discussion. But no platforms exist for a full visibility discussion anymore. Twitter has a character limit unless you pay, bluesky has a limit, people mainly fight on YouTube comments, a reddit comment chain is disorganized as hell, tumblr the same. I honestly think it has very little to do with platforms. There are word limits, but I do find them enough to get my point through most of the times. I think it has more to do with people unwilling to engage in conversatio…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 01:59 PM
1

I can agree. Many people forge their own misery
/r/MensRights18/03/25 01:42 PM
2

And people say twitter ain't toxic /s Also, I think it is wrong to just call others feminists because they hate men. The proper word is misandrist. You're literally slandering another group and forcing them to be your enemy
/r/MensRights18/03/25 01:17 PM
2

You know, feminists who chose bears in the forest question don't really like bears, right?
/r/MensRights17/03/25 04:18 PM
5

Can't tell if you're serious or if you're just shitposting 😂
/r/MensRights17/03/25 04:12 PM
3

That I don't know. Now I know. Thanks for the information, and the situation is disgusting
/r/MensRights17/03/25 07:55 AM
41

Don't mind me, just throwing some cherries that I picked up. Interpret them the way you want to https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/25/australia-suicide-rates-seniors-data Men die by suicide at much higher rates than women across all age groups. Among older men, loss of purpose and identity after retirement, weaker connections to children and grandchildren and to social networks can all be factors. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/oct/10/dementia-set-to-become-australias-leading…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 07:52 AM
8

Great question! We should be advocating for mandatory paternity tests. I just added it to my list of things to advocate. Good call
/r/MensRights17/03/25 07:28 AM
-14

But when a man finds out children are not his because of adultery, the same government will still force him to keep supporting someone else's child. Which country are you talking about? In many countries, paternity tests are reliable ways to get out of child support, and in some countries, that is the only case when paternity tests are legal. For example, it is the case in both Germany and France edit: Apparantly, it is the case in USA
/r/MensRights17/03/25 07:27 AM
1

the behaviors and beliefs of the vast majority of feminists I don't think we know if those behaviors are done by the majority or the loud minority, especially when news on this sub are very cherry-picked. I tend to believe most feminists are the silence kind who won't even tell you about it and are most oblivion to online discussions surrounding it. If that is the case, then openly attacking feminism would be hitting a lot of innocent target, causing unnecessary hatred, which is what happened wh…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 03:06 AM
1

To go along with your MLK analogy: it’s like conflating the white population of America with the KKK! Perhaps MLK hoped that the KKK members would ultimately change their views, but I doubt if he ever thought the KKK as an organisation would ever be an ally in the Civil Rights movement much less see black Americans as social equals! Not really the case. Feminism is far from KKK and is not inherently against men. By its core feminism is the advocate for women's rights. Some people(many depending …
/r/MensRights17/03/25 02:13 AM
1

If the majority of feminists act and believe a certain way, that is feminism I think there should be a clear distinction between individuals, no matter the size, and ideologies. Also, if you look up most of the feminist websites and their articles, they will tell you that men also face many problems, not that they actually care or take actions, but they do address those problems without hating on men. I think there is a future where feminists, even if a relatively small portion of them, will joi…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 01:33 AM
1

I don't think that is the case. I think they did achieve their in many places, but in middle east countries and some other places, the goal has not been achieved yet. However, most of the feminists don't realy care about those women in those places, do they? So I would say, a lot of feminists in the west don't really believe in feminism. Also, I don't think an ideology can have a public face. An organization can because somebody's running it. An ideology is simply a few lines of words, sometimes…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 12:51 AM
0

I don't think it is the ideology itself that radicalized people. I think it is radical people who caused others to also become radical. Feminism by its core is really just "advocating for women's equality in society." I don't see fault in this but do see a lot of fault in people executing it and things they did.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 12:19 AM
6

Yeah, your other posts are kinda crazy, but this one is absolutely on point. To many people in societies who still thinks men can not be victims and men can not be vulnerable. I think the situation is changing, so I am quite positive about this particular issue. You nailed it
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:58 PM
-1

interesting, I actually believe in the opposite. The ideology is fine and quite positive even, but many individuals are very far away from what they preach
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:54 PM
-4

Complaining does help promoting that type of posts. Encouraging others to do certain things and doing that thing yourself are both helpful, vary only by degree in different circumstances.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 07:17 PM
2

I personally believe everyone is socialized in different ways and therefore comes to different conclusions at life and the way of thinkings. Feelings over logic, and logic over feelings are not simple personality traits to slap on someone. Sometimes we are more emotional, and sometimes we are more rational.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:02 PM
-3

I don't understand what you're saying here? Are you asking why some women chose to do onlyfans? Well, for some quick bucks(although it appears that most onlyfans creators don't really earn anything), and cheap attention/male validation(this is probably the predominant cause due to how isolated everyone gets in todays society) Anyway, how does this have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights16/03/25 03:58 PM
1

The article you linked is a literary analysis with queer perspective. It is meant to interpret things as gay and all that. That is the purpose of that perspective of literary analysis. I won't say it is the general way of understanding of Lord of the Rings. But I can see where you're coming from
/r/MensRights16/03/25 03:32 PM
1

I highly disagree. There is a clear difference between homosexuality and male friendships. To my understanding, being able to be open with your friends is friendship, not homosexuality. Homosexuality needs to be romantic and sometimes sexual. I think you mistaking BL fanfic for what people actually think of fictional male relationships. Who else would interpret Lord of the rings as being gay? I have never heard anyone seriously arguing about Lord of the rings being gay. On the others hand, illad…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 02:45 PM
5

same here 👌
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:30 PM
-5

So true, man. Also, I doubt the people he's attacking are actual "white knights," or are trying to get women's attention. It is more likely that those men who say horrible things to other men are just under the influence of internalized patriarchal thinking, which makes them hostile toward other men in default.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:29 PM
-1

This is so real. The thing about men not being friendly to each other that OP brought up is just bizarre. If you ask me, I think male friendship has been healthier than ever throughout history
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:27 PM
2

yeah, hard agree
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:23 PM
-28

Probably just some internalized patriarchal ideas, you know. Judging women by their appearance before anything else
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:22 PM
11

Gold-diggers exist, and non-gold-diggers exist, too. The internets tend to emphasize one's size to a certain group and downplay the other's size to another group. I am here to precisely say that not all women are gold-diggers, but some of them are, and I have no idea how many of them are
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:21 PM
0

I know. He's just hating on women, which is very ironic. I explained the irony under his reply to my comment.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:13 PM
-6

Most women will call you an incel simply if you disagree with them does that sound logical to you? This is literally an insult. It's like calling someone by a slur. Does saying slurs make you incapable of logical thinking? No. Also, can you not seethe irony here. You call women incapableof logical thinking because they insult men, and now you're insulting them yourself. Can you really not see the irony here?
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:11 PM
-8

Yes, everyone is capable of logical thinking
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:37 AM
17

So, you said "let them wait for the bear" and got this message? Wow, Reddit is really not fking hiding, huh? This is extremely discriminative if what you're saying is true. I suggest filing an appeal
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:10 AM
-5

come on, man. You don't have to say that
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:08 AM
1

Indeed indeed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/25 07:45 AM
-9

I absolutely agree with your last point. However, not so much with anything else. Men need to open up with each other, form deep relationships, and face struggles they encounter together. It's a great idea, and it should've always been this way. However, I think you're attributing the problem to the wrong group. You are literally complaining about patriarchy. If you fantasize about the past being a place where men can share their feelings, cry in each others arms, talk about their struggles, you…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 03:07 AM
-2

That's not very irrelevant. If you read more works written in the 60s and 70s, you'll understand my point
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/25 06:09 PM
18

This is the kind of things this sub is made for!❤️ can't help since I am not a British, but I hope everything goes well smoothly
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:07 AM
-2

That's not the case. If you're talking about wollstonecraft, sure. But if you're talking about 1960s, that's just not the case
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 11:26 PM
1

Yeah, I totally agree. It's even my first time hearing it as a problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 04:26 PM
10

I don't think men leaving the dating market is going to cause the destruction of civilization. The society is still going to function as long as everyone needs to pay taxes and buys food from stores. However, if we can actually create a mass boycott of dating, the government and most women, who did not care much about men's struggles, will be forced to give us attentions and meet our necessary needs.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:08 AM
1

I oppose your attitude, but I hope things work out for you, no matter what you're going through
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 08:47 AM
2

As a supporter of this argument, my best guess is "I need to fulfill my reproductive instinct," but even that feels a bit weird
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 08:46 AM
1

The problem with the gap opening up between men/boys and women/girls. Is we can't talk about the elephant in the room and that elephant is sex. I do not know that. I thought the education gap between genders is due to the process of brain development. Female brains mature at a faster rate than male brains, leading to higher scores in schools. I am afraid all those responses are irrational, sex and relationships are a huge part of most people's lives. Any attempt to look at the struggles of moder…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 08:43 AM
-3

Did you post it on the wrong sub?
/r/MensRights14/03/25 06:24 AM
1

Rehabilitation should always be the goal of any legal system. Punishment can not be the goal but a tool toward rehabilitation. If punishment becomes the goal, then you're just taking revenge, which is not justice, and will never be.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 03:30 PM
9

Talks failed because we lacked in number. It has nothing to do with logic and winning arguments against the opposition. To this day, you can find solid arguments in support of segregation. It's always about number. We need more people to be aware of men's suffering and challenges. It is how every human rights movement starts. Look up conscious raising, it was how feminists back in the 1900s started. We need to do the same. By the way, I think the do nothing strategy really doesn't take away from…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 03:25 PM
7

It's not about moral high ground. It's about what is right and how we can achieve our goal
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 03:19 PM
7

The most unhelpful thing to do, regardless of the context, is to tell yourself that achieving your goal is impossible. You might as well give up all together. Also, you can argue people are biologically disincentivized, but look at this sub, r/mensright, r/menslib, justin trottier from canada, and so many more. These people dedicated their life, or at least part(no matter the proportion) of it, to support men. They are as disincentivized as you are and as everybody else. Yet, they decided not to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 03:18 PM
1

Fair take
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 03:13 PM
-1

That's actually a great idea. I think I heard somewhere that Japan actually created an app with similar functions
/r/MensRights13/03/25 03:12 PM
1

I feel like you're too deep in the fantasy to be saved. I feel sorry for you, but there's nothing I can do for you, sorry
/r/MensRights13/03/25 02:31 PM
10

That's why we need to be the one making a difference, making more people join out cause
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 10:31 AM
5

All human rights groups started off playing the victims, and people do not accept hateful victims. You can read those feminist works back in the 1900s(not the earlier ones. They are mostly irrelevant). They all focus on how they were oppressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 10:18 AM
1

Yeah, that's the realistic aspect of it. However, you can keep screenshots of the texts tho. Just tell them after sex that u have evidence of their consent. It most likely will prevent anyone from even trying(the downside is the person will probably not have sex with you again)
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:33 AM
9

The best prevention is to avoid being in private rooms with a woman alone. If you want to have sex without the lady regretting it halfway and suing you, you can record a little consent video featuring the date, location, and the face of you and the one you're having sex with, so that you have a strong evidence in court. More importantly, doing this basically prevents people from even trying to accuse you
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:27 AM
15

Yeah, I've already withdrawn from dating scene, decided not to get married, and abandoned all social media except reddit. I don't encourage other men to do this because I think most men would still enjoy those aspects of life. To ask them to do this could be a bit cruel
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 08:10 AM
2

🫂🫂🫂It's brave and caring of you to take care of your son even when the situation is this horrible. If I were in your shoes, I would not be able to handle the 50/50 custody. You are a very strong, caring, and empathetic man. Although your son chose to go in the car, but I believe he still loves you deeply and perhaps has his own thinking. Maybe he understood how crazy his mom was and was trying to protect you. If he chose to go with you, who knew what his mom would do. I can't actually help you b…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 05:30 AM
25

But now that more women attend university... there's zero enthusiasm about implementing male-only scholarships, or even just to abolish or equalize female-only scholarships (which still exist). Nobody is demanding it and protesting for it, so the universities won't bother. We really need more people to join our cause to make real difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 12:05 AM
1

OK, so what does it go back to other than a lack of value for those people? Hammer and nail. You can explain the situation in so many ways: general lack of public awareness, lack of empathy, traditional ideas of men not being able to be the victims, etc. My point is that when we try to make male only spaces "bad people" try (and succeed) in stopping them. I agree. That happens. It's unfortunate this type orf things happens again and again
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:59 PM
1

Actually, even in a peaceful society look at the male educational achievement rates, unemployment rates, homelessness etc. Young men are being disenfranchised on the whole. Why? Because generally we do not have support systems for them. These are real issues that Mens Right tackles with it goes back to disposability No, it does not The link you showed literally went against your point. Society does care. It's bad people who tried to ruin them
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:42 PM
19

This is what we call progress! Salute to the people who worked and fought hard for it to happen!
/r/MensRights12/03/25 05:07 AM
2

Ah, libertarian. That is a fair take
/r/MensRights12/03/25 05:05 AM
1

I have friends who used to work construction. Anway, that's not important. The thing is you aren't really arguing about men being disposable. You're arguing that blue-collar workers should have better work environment, which is a very legit argument, that's why we have worker unions(I don't know if they exist in the place you live, but they do in where I live). Many people in blue-collar environments are forced to "choose" hard labor or homelessness. Most blue-collar workers are poor and struggl…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:10 AM
5

I believe if a company sucks, and is losing profits, then it deserves to fail This is just normal capitalism. Social darwinism leans more toward things like opposing social security net, opposing social welfare, discriminating against marginalized groups, like amputees, abuse victims.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:58 AM
1

You realize they chose the job they work in, right? Unless we're talking about conscription, people are not forced to take hard labor jobs. There are female police officers, female firefighters, and even soldiers. People choose what they want to do. You can blame the education system. You can blame the wealth inequality, but working a blue-collar job is not being disposable.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:29 AM
6

Yeah, I heard this term often in r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. It's just that most people probably can't understand you when you use this term
/r/MensRights12/03/25 02:29 AM
4

Agree. Although I am not fond of the idea of manosphere, most medias really do not show men and boys enough care and empathy. Personally, I think men's safe space should not all be labeled as manosphere. There shouldn't be an umbrella term that covers all men's space as different groups vary in both their purposes and political stances. For example, obvious misogynists like Andrew Tate are obviously more rightward-leaning than redpill/blackpill community, which is also different from MGTOW. For …
/r/MensRights12/03/25 02:28 AM
-1

social darwinism is different from evolutionary psychology in sense that evolutionary psychology try to explain some human behaviors base on evolution while social darwinists believe we need to act like animals in modern society, preying on the weak and only caring for ourselves and our genes. They might not say it out loud, but this is their undertone
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:59 AM
1

Dude, I confronted you with logic in your other post, and you just ghosted me. Maybe take a look at your own hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:56 AM
1

It's not even evolutionary psychology. Dude is just a sugarcoated social darwinist
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:55 AM
1

It's not about excusing bad behavior, but understanding that it's not simply a product of lack of reasoning; it’s also a result of deeply ingrained biological responses that are centuries in the making Care to share some examples? women, often assigning them intrinsic value, while men are expected to build their value externally Can you even explain what value you're talking about. What is going to happen if you just don't? Who are you even trying to prove your worth to? So, rather than dismissi…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:53 AM
-2

I think of myself as both a feminist and a MRA. The two groups obviously hate each other, but it never bothers me. I know what I stand for, and it's fine not to comply just for acceptance
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:24 AM
3

I totally agree
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:22 AM
6

If a person is kissing you without your consent, you're being violated. I hope you can get your justice and heal your wound
/r/MensRights11/03/25 06:05 PM
-2

"The bottom 80% of men are essentially incels in the dating market. You can see this reflected in Tinder stats. Women swipe right on less than 10% of men, and even those matches rarely turn into dates. The majority of men are invisible unless they prove themselves." I fail to see how is this equal to being disposable. I also don't see it being a negative thing. Not everyone needs to get a partner, and I'd argue a life of solitude is much better. "You'll notice that a significant number of men si…
/r/MensRights11/03/25 06:02 PM
35

"the future is female" is such a weird phrase. It makes me cringe
/r/MensRights11/03/25 04:37 PM
-4

I am a man, and I dont think we see the world the same way, and very simply, can you answer me how men are disposable when it is not due to war or slavery?
/r/MensRights11/03/25 04:25 PM
0

This has to be one of the craziest articles I read this month
/r/MensRights11/03/25 03:51 PM
-9

Some crazy patriarchal shit. I do not disagree with your point on nature and animal kingdom, but we are modern people living in societies. men have to earn their worth. You either build value or become disposable. It is just not applicable most of the time. Unless your country is under war or you still live in countries with dictators, nobody is disposing you. I can't even think of how that is going to work in a peaceful country with no forced labor and that sort of things. Let's say you live in…
/r/MensRights11/03/25 03:51 PM
0

Men are not protected by patriarchy. That's my answer and my stance on this matter. If someone tells you otherwise, they clearly do not have the same stance as me, and my answer do not represent them. Also, you're the one who define Patriarchy here. We and people you spoke to clearly share a different version of definition. You think Patriarchy protects men, but I don't. And what exactly are feminists doing about this? I have seen NOTHING from feminists about pushing back against this bias again…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 05:11 AM
11

I think it has to do with the booktok community. The "man written by woman" and "woman written by man" things are booktok terminologies. You're in the wrong place for your questions
/r/MensRights11/03/25 03:56 AM
-2

Feminists would disagree with you on this. Most certainly, I disagree with a lot of their views, too. However, I do feel like a lot of problems men face are due to patriarchy. For example, unequal sentencing comes from judges being unable to empathize with men but doing it too much with women, feminine men got side-eyed for not conforming to traditional masculinity, etc. I am not a women, so I prefer not to speak about women's issues. I also don't think patriarchy is a scapegoat of men(although …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 02:45 AM
1

I think the thing is, in our current society, at least western and developed ones, there isn't really much to fight about for feminists. Unless they advocate for women's rights in Middle-East(which only a few very hardcore feminists do), there isn't much of a reason for them to be feminists, so if they are one, it is more possible than not that they are trying to smuggle some bad ideas with feminism as their disguise
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 01:37 AM
-1

I think nowadays patriarchy is really more of a mindset thing than anything. It no longer exists in its physical form(at least not in progressive areas), but patriarchal ideas still affect a lot of people
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 10:57 PM
-7

Just by reading it, I don't actually feel like the poster is being hostile toward her husband or anything. To be frank, I actually found the exchange between the couple kinda funny and cute. The comments, well, are quite hostile, and I don't blame them for not knowing the poster is a SAHM. However, they should've been more sensitive and not jump to conclusion before knowing the full picture. Anyway, I don't find anything unusual or overly problematic in that post. Just a classic "internet raging…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 05:37 PM
53

raping and blackmailing are two of the most sinister crime an individual could commit. I know not much about law, but 5 years seem a little to less
/r/MensRights10/03/25 05:27 PM
3

Yeah, I totally agree. Sometimes, organizations do just become tribes with no logic or justice but ingroup interest
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 04:56 PM
6

There are countless different types of feminism. To say all are the same is discriminative. I would say that some of the feminisms are very hostile toward men, some are pretty neutral, and a few actually try to help men out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 04:37 PM
4

You are going a bit too far. Things like the right to work, voting rights, etc are not exactly just desires.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 04:35 PM
1

Never had it happen to me, so I don't really know, but the video does recommend it
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:17 PM
34

Absolutely, however, I suspect that 83% would go down if we delve into specific areas
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 04:36 AM
-2

Totally agree. Call the cops if you got the evidence, and leave if you can foreseen it happening
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:17 AM
1

I am sorry for what you went through, and I hope you can find the help and support you need
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:13 AM
2

It is not. You need to ask for help when you need help. Call the suicide hotline if you feel like killing yourself. Get into some support groups if you want to emotional support. Make friends with people who care about you and will console you when you're depressed. If you refuse to seek for help and whine about not ever getting one, you're only forging your own suffering. I know it is hard for many people to seek for help because of their upbringing and the idea of absolute masculinity, but I b…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:02 AM
12

porn is not misogynistic. It fulfills the sexual need of a person. Let it be straight, gay, male, female, trans, etc, doesn't matter a dime
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:12 PM
1

what do you think is the right word?
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:21 AM
0

I don't think you can choose what you internalize. Your action is your choice, but your perception, which causes your actions, is not.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:21 AM
1

hypergamy is a very patriarchal thing. Most humans have also been living in patriarchy for tens of thousands of years
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:19 AM
1

I don't how matriarchy would function, but I guess it would be men going after women with status, which is also unhealthy. The thing is status shouldn't be viewed as a part of a person's attractiveness or worth
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:18 AM
-1

Is a woman not responsible for their actions? If they aren't, why are they considered real adult people? You can't have it both ways. They are responsible. I am just saying the cause of this type of behavior is internalized patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:16 AM
-1

society in its simplest form is many people live together. Patriarchy is when men are pitched to compete against each other for status and resource(women included) and women only want the ean with higher status and have no abilities, autonomies, and responsibilities of their own. A society does not need to be patriarchal. It's just that we live in one with internalized patriarchal ideas
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:36 AM
0

If a woman wear body cam on me during a date, I would be very uncomfortable, so I expect the same. I think it would be fine if the other person consented to it?
/r/MensRights09/03/25 05:11 AM
0

If you want to fight back patriarchy, we have to change the way women behave and think. yeah
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:56 AM
-5

we are civilized humans with ideas of equality, slef-reliance, and more. We need to fight back patriarchy
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:39 AM
1

I am sorry for your experience. I can see how this post is very insensitive
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:10 AM
-2

can women do anything negative, in your view, that is not caused by a man/patriarchy? First, man does not equal patriarchy. Both men and women are victims and causes of patriarchy. Second, yeah, murder, arson, domestic abuse, verbal manipulation, etc. If so, what are examples of unique things that women are guilty of as a majority ingroup favorism. You can argue it has some ties to patriarchy, but I don't think it is the case. Asking because I want to see if people like you believe women have th…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:18 AM
-56

there is no such thing as female nature or male nature. Gold-digging is not the nature of women just like violence is not the nature of men. You're a human, if you can't control the lizard side of your brain, no matter what gender you are, it is on you. What we do have are internalized cultural values that are planted into your head when we're kids. Patriarchy made men slaves to material value and pussies while making women only going after men with resources(wealth) and avoiding reponsibilities…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:03 AM
-74

women only going after men with status is a clear showing of how internalize patriarchy is in our society. What's your problem? Do you not want to live in a world where material wealth does not affect how you're perceived by others?
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:45 AM
28

Yes, ingroup bitching about outgroups. It's the most human thing ever
/r/MensRights09/03/25 01:38 AM
-112

This is literally patriarchy, and some people still deny its existence and how it harms men
/r/MensRights09/03/25 01:33 AM
-2

To me, patriarchy is the idea that men need to strive and compete with each other for the control of resources(patriarchs believe women are also just resources) and status of the society. I absolutely despise it. I do not want to compete against other men. I don't want to live like fking lions who can't view other men as anything but competition. I don't want to act tough just for women to like me and intimidate other men. More than 90% of men lose in this competition of status and resources aut…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 01:32 AM
3

It's all about what people perceive as appropriate. If nobody stands up against the behavior shown in the first picture, it would be perceived as appropriate, so the best way to fight back against it is to voice your disapproval and express how offended you are
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 04:45 PM
-16

Okay, I can get behind it. Nice one for calling out other's bullshit
/r/MensRights07/03/25 11:14 PM
13

not just western countries
/r/MensRights07/03/25 11:12 PM
5

Here is the original article. I read it a few days ago, already forgot the specifics. You can check by yourself https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ethnicity-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2022/statistics-on-ethnicity-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2022-html#offender-characteristics Go to 7.1 sex & ethnicity for the graph
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/25 09:26 AM
5

Of course! https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ethnicity-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2022/statistics-on-ethnicity-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2022-html#offender-characteristics The specific graph can be found in 7.1 Sex & Ethnicity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/25 09:24 AM
-1

I fear, with the rise of conservatism, the rate is going to go up again
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:51 AM
0

yeah, this is the sad state of things
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:48 AM
-1

that men and bears controversy was one of the stupidest controversy on the internet
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:46 AM
1

Yeah, it's hard to believe somone can look at this graph and say "yeah, ethnicity is the biggest problem here"
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:32 AM
2

for the second time, Can you provide me a specific passage I posted and we can talk about that?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:31 AM
1

I can form arguments and base them on evidence and chains of logic. You can only throw insults. It's not hard to tell who's the one looking stupid
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:31 AM
-2

what it, can you be more specific. You realize throwing insults at me is very unproductive, right?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:29 AM
-1

I feel like r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a good place r/MensLib is also a nice place, but let's say there is no other place, you still do not need to support manosphere. You can support men without supporting a specific space
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:07 AM
0

First of all it’s women who look down on us when we cry Never experienced that before. The only time I can remember I got looked down on when I cry was from my patriarchal father when I was a kid. To say women in general look down on men when they cry is such a skewed pov. Maybe this has happened to you, which I feel sorry for. But your experience is just anecdote. You can't generalize it on an entire group. Just like I wouldn't say "all fathers look down on their kids for crying" or "no women e…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:52 AM
1

care to further elaborate? You realize there is no way for me to engage with what you just typed, right? Can you provide me a specific passage I posted and we can talk about that?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:44 AM
-2

Problem is women don't tend to respect men with feminine traits, which is the complete opposite of what they proffess. Not my experience. Women around me don't come to my face and tell me I'm not a man or whatever. They probably will never consider me as a dating option because I'm not masculine enoguh, but it is really just personal preference. Feminising our son's is NOT the answer..! I don't think anyone is trying to do that, unless you believe proper men should bottle up their emotions and n…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:42 AM
-1

Yeah, you see. I don't think Jordan Peterson is a good guy, and he is probably the least manospheric figure I can find in manosphere
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:39 AM
-3

However, most of the left is undoubtedly mysandric. I disagree on this part. I think most of the left either does not care enough about men or has no knowledge on men's problems. I believe mysandry is really only a small part of it. There are people who believe men are evil and generally hate and discriminate men, but they are heavily criticized in left-leaning space, at least in the one I'm in. There needs to be a real alternative to the manosphere This I agree. The current mainstream left does…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:32 AM
-1

Supporting men doesn't mean you need to support manosphere and their bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:27 AM
1

I've been in the redpill shithole, Andrew Tate, MGTOW, I've experienced that phrase. I've been deep in manosphere. I don't need to educate myself. I know they are toxic
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:25 AM
0

care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:22 AM
1

Do you believe the patriarchy exists? It exists but less influential than back in the day. It has been persecuting men, and it still is. You do know which subreddit you’re posting in? It’s a bit of an odd question but you do have a bad opinion of the manosphere. The above article would include men’s rights to be part of that. Personally, I won't include MRA in manosphere, just like I think feminism is separate from misandry
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:21 AM
-11

I am a straight man with some feminine trait and left-leaning attitude. I believe men are facing societal problems overlooked by many. The problem is many of the things posted in this sub are utter non-sense. Some posts have decent takes. Some are just delusional. People often don't even read the articles linked in the posts before complaining
/r/MensRights07/03/25 02:12 AM
-38

You don't need to look into the shittiest hole possible for answers
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:39 AM
-29

Yeah, manosphere is a really evil community. They try to pour all men into the same mold and smuggle misogynistic ideas into their listenrs' head. They really need to be stopped
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:38 AM
0

Hey, if you think men are excluded here, you're just getting ragebaited here. You assume it is going to exclude certain groups of people without any evidence. You treat what is in your head a reality. I'd argue this pre-sentence report is going to help decrease the gap between men and women's sentencing disparity by giving judges opportunities to learn male defendants' backgrounds and feel more empathy and sympathy for them.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:10 AM
-4

There is no shame in crying. Pariarchy forces men to bottle up our emotions and bear sufferings. To cry and to express our emotions are to fight back against pariarchy and truely live freely. If a boy is allowed to cry, a man should. It's only natural for us to cry when we feel like it, and it doesn't hurt anybody, so I do not see how shaming men for crying is in any way justifiable. Also, you think that women do not like weak men, but that is just your prejudice against women. There are so many…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:40 AM
-2

The council says the list is non-exhaustive and PSR can be necessary if the defendant is not in one of those categories This is a quote from another news article on this matter
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:17 AM
4

Yeah, although I've never watched any of the show you mentioned, I agree with you. This shit has to stop
/r/MensRights06/03/25 04:31 PM
1

This man has dyslexia
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/25 04:29 PM
-24

You can't just fabricate your own reality and claim being discriminated. PSR does not exclude anybody. It states PSR is necessary for certain groups of people, but people outside those groups can also have PSR. They are not excluded in any way shape or form
/r/MensRights06/03/25 04:22 PM
-18

How does it not apply to men?
/r/MensRights06/03/25 04:17 PM
-31

two-tier is such a deceptive way to call it. The correct way to call it is pre-sentence reports, and its purpose is to give judges details on the offender's background, motives and personal life before sentencing so that the sentence would work best for rehabilitation. Conservatives are truly desperate here, literally fabricating their own reality
/r/MensRights06/03/25 04:01 PM
1

secure schools is basically youth prison for mentally vulnerable kids. About 80%(about 150) of kids in secure schools are boys. It is not lesser punishment.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:50 PM
0

Letting criminals free because of being born boy or girls. This is not what is happening. Read the article, and you'll know that nobody is letting anyone off the hook. The title is meant to ragebait you
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:25 PM
2

We literally won't know until the legal SYSTEM starts writihg gender neutral laws. We do know. https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crime/crime-trend This is data provided by FBI
/r/MensRights06/03/25 11:11 AM
-1

You might understand if you actually try to read the article and the data, instead of making up your mind the moment you see the headline
/r/MensRights06/03/25 10:44 AM
1

The problem is US is that dems don't care enough to do anything about it and reps, mostly formed by christians, are either going to be neutral or in favor of circumcision. If you want circumcision on infants banned, your best shot is to convince the dems. However, MRA is really divided in which party to support.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 07:53 AM
30

we need to voice our disapproval of this behavior publicly, not just here in a small sub. We need to boycutt these types of product, and do hashtags to spread our message across social medias
/r/MensRights06/03/25 07:17 AM
-3

Despite my deep depise for them, manosphere and redpill do exist. I view them as harmful, delusional, and advocates of patriarchy, but they do brand themselves as "helping men." Personally, I think they are complete bullshit and take away the living space of actual, non-toxic/non-pariarchal, male self-help medias.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 05:09 AM
1

indeed indeed. The Democrat has been on the wrong path for too long, too far away from actual equality and liberty already
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:56 AM
7

The left has brought a lot of wonderful things to society, but it also leads to things like this. I won't say the left is the problem. I think we just need to clear out the bad part. We don't need to discredit the good part
/r/MensRights06/03/25 02:51 AM
3

Growing up, however, I was never taught how to harness it effectively. Raised by a single mother, I was instead directed to bottle it up versus expressing it appropriately. It had a major impact on my life that I still deal with today (although much more successfully). I can definitely agree with you on that. Our society needs more care for men's emotional needs. It is so important because historically, men were not allowed to express their true selves, weakness, and vulnerabilities while men we…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 02:25 AM
-1

Be the change you want to see. Create male safe space, start speaking up for men's right, protest adn fight like how last century feminists fight, together we can defeat patriarchy and discrimination against men
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:59 AM
21

This is really ridiculous. UK men need to fight back with votes and protest and parade
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:46 AM
0

ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS, MURDERERS AND PREDATORS! KILL ALL MEN you just talked to a misandrist, not a feminist. A real feminist who believes in equality does not say shit like this
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:37 AM
0

Fr Fr
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:11 AM
2

I know this data, and I think there really isn't enough institutions, groups, and organizations that prioritize helping men and our mental problems specifically
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:10 AM
2

They can build separate female youth prisons Not sustainable when you only have 12 inmates per year. they can close down all youth prisons and build enough secure youth homes for all youth offenders. The first secure school was built in 2022. Please give it some time. People should be treated as individuals. This one I do agree. It is a legit criticism, and I share the same belief. I can see where you're coming from, and I think this should always be the case. I am not arguing the decision to se…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:09 AM
0

mentle help resouce
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:01 AM
-12

There are procedures that transfer kids from youth prisons to secure schools. Also, secure schools are a very new thing in UK. Also, it has nothing to do with speaking out. the 50% rate is about self-harm not complaints or self-report. That said, I've never in my life been to youth prison before, so I do not know if male self-harming is neglected in youth prisons
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:58 AM
0

Secure schools and youth prisons serve the same purpose. Secure schools are specifically built for more vulnerable kids, mostly mentally vulnerable boys. Girls, about 12 per year(2%), are accounted for more than half of all self-harm cases in youth prison. It makes sense to send them straight to secure schools.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:45 AM
-5

youth prisons and secure schools are basically the same thing. It's just that secure schools are designed for more vulnerable kids and have a more equal gender proportion. Vulnerable boys do also go to secure schools instead of youth prison.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:32 AM
1

It's a move that kind of makes sense, if they were being moved to a separate, similar facility, which they're not I would say secure schools are the correct option here. Secure schools are youth prisons for vulnerable kids, including mentally vulnerable boys. Also, I want emphasize on the number 440 here. UK has a teenage population of 4million with about 440 kids total in youth prison. 0.01% of teenagers are in youth prison. Can this really show any bias against boys? I'm really doubtful toward…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:29 AM
-19

You realize they are sent to secure school, right? Secure schools are for kids who are too vulnerable to handle youth prisons.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:17 AM
0

No, gender doesn't matter here. It is equally bad for a mother and a father to kill their kids under the same condition. I was arguing you can't have the same condition because father do not give brith, so things like immediately killing a kid after giving birth won't be the case
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:15 AM
4

This https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/5mGcjZVRAF
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:15 PM
4

This https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/5mGcjZVRAF
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:15 PM
0

Only a small group of people are saying she should get treatment. Most people are not. Also, sorry, I don't know men can suffer PPD. My bad
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:13 PM
2

No, she should go to prison. Why are you assuming I am fine with killing children?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:11 PM
1

It depends. I know some people are just naturally attracted to kids. It's not their fault, and I can understand how sometimes things can slip. Still, my empathy does not discard their crime. They should still go to prison and get punished for it, because the harm they caused can not be excused. However, for people like diddy, epstein, I do not have any empathy for them. They are straight up monsters from hell.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:10 PM
-77

Okay, a total of around 440 kids are in uk youth prisons. About 2% of them are girls(about 12 per year got custody sentences). This 2% is accounted for more than 50% of the self-harm cases in youth prisons. By moving this 2% to secure schools(specialized institutions for kids too vulnerable for youth prisons), you free up resources for the remaining 98%(boys) in youth prisons. It also makes sense that you don't want to throw female inmates into the a space filled with 98% male inmates. By the wa…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:04 PM
0

What do you think is the boys need in this case? This I don't understand. No one in this post explained how boys are supposed to be related in this.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:49 PM
-6

About 440 people in total are in youth prison. I don't know if this reflects any misandrist tendency, but I do feel like 440 people is not a number big enough for us to make that judgement
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:46 PM
-2

I agree that UK boys are neglected, but this specific case is not a showing of this neglect. I think there is a legitmate reason for girls not to be put in youth prisons but secure schools(which is basically another type of youth prison but for those too vulnerable for actual youth prison). This has nothing to do with boys being neglected. We should work toward a future where both genders are valued, instead of a future where both are neglected.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:43 PM
1

The person who made the comment is claiming the murderer is not being hold accountable. I am saying that she is. It is just that people are simultaneously showing empathy
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:40 PM
2

My stance does not change. The murderer should be empathized for the crime and killing is not okay. Also, if the mental illness is really that serious, I would argue the father should probably go to an asylum to get treatment instead of prison. I think PPD alone is not enough to justify killing babies. But, if it is something like severe schizophrenia, then I think there is a case to be made. I feel like there is a serious misunderstanding between us. I don't support murdering babies, and things…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:38 PM
-6

Because it’s discrimination. If they’re doing it for girls, it should be done for boys, too. disagree The neglect of boys’ lives and wellbeing is horrific in the UK hard agree. UK really needs to improve their gender equality.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:31 PM
1

Dude, emphasizing with people is not a gender-restricted action. Men can get empathy, too. The real problem is that society gives men significantly less empathy than it gives women. The solution should be increasing the empathy men get, instead of decreasing the empathy women get.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:29 PM
1

I'm not. I'm simply saying that a male would never be in the murderer's situation. I think she should be punished for killing a baby. I don't see how you can think I support her action
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:27 PM
1

This is utterly disgusting. The court hearing is on April, 14th. I am waiting for that day, damn it
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:26 PM
0

Nobody is saying it isn't. I am just saying that it is fine for people to emphasize with criminals. It is a human thing to emphasize with other people when you can understand them.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:20 PM
1

It's a repost
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:18 PM
-2

What do you think the solution is? Building a female-only youth prison?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:16 PM
-3

That is the problem. A father can not get into the situation the person in the news got into. A father can not give birth and then kill the baby. So you can't just compare the two. The step of giving birth is neglected in your situation here. Can't you understand?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:16 PM
-52

We can have a more intelligent conversation if you can elaborate more
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:14 PM
-11

Secure school is not a female-exclusice thing. In UK, 72% of secure schools are filled with boys, so boys who are too vulnerable for youth prisons do go to secure schools. If the system is broken, fix it for everyone I don't know if the system is broken or not. I just don't see why sending girls to secure school instead of youth prison is such a big problem. Another thing is young girls, 2% of kids in youth prison, are accounted for more than 50% of self-harm. I don't see how "stop sending peopl…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:13 PM
-3

It is. Killing babies is an evil act. I am not saying the murderer was right. I was saying that a father can't give birth. Therefore, it is impossible for "if it had been the father that had done this" to ever happen.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:02 PM
-2

I'm just pointing out that the said situation is impossible. A man does not get pregnant and give birth
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:01 PM
-14

"pretending the exact same issues are not affecting men" The issue that 98% of inmates around you are of the opposite gender?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:59 PM
-16

They go to secure school. They don't just walk away free of charge. They still have their sentences. The only thing that changed is that now they got sent to another place
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:57 PM
-4

Where’s the accountability here? She murdered a HUMAN BEING. So because she isn’t mentally fit, this is okay? People were showing empathy, not arguing she shouldn't face consequences. It is human to show empathy. Let a man do the same thing with similar mental issues. Men do not get PPD. Men do not give birth.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:53 PM
-1

People were showing empathy, not arguing she shouldn't face consequences. It is human to show empathy.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:51 PM
1

Empathizing with people who have done wrong things is not something that belongs only to feminism. People empathizing with criminals all the time. For example, illegal immigrants. When people can understand why you do certain things, they empathize with you. It doesn't mean they will just pardon your crime. It just means they sort of understand it, and it is the stance of most people in the mentioned sub. It is normal human behavior, not feminism.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:49 PM
3

still under investigation
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:43 PM
3

Still under investigation
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:43 PM
1

It is not a valid point. While I do not think PPD justifies any form of murder, PPD is a serious mental illness. People suffer serious cognitive problems because of it. Testosterone by the very most can be equivalent to menstruation when it comes to effect on one's ability to think
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:43 PM
-18

A father doesn't give birth. The situation is completely different. You are not taking into account of the mental effect of giving birth in a hotel room.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:38 PM
-78

Because boys don't have this problem? You see, the problem here is that youth prisons in UK are filled with 98% boys. About 12 girls is taken into custody per year. It's like throwing women into male prisons. Also, another thing is not sending 12 girls into youth prison a year does not mean boys don't get to go to secure schools.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:23 PM
-203

This one is really not that unreasonable if you look into the data
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:11 PM
-38

Ms Hancock said: “It is important to state that this is not about ignoring the needs of boys, many of whom are also highly vulnerable. “But with 98 per cent of the secure estate made up of boys, the needs of girls are too often overlooked. Okay, I actually think it makes a bit of sense after learning the data behind it. On average, only 12 girls is taken into custody per year. I can see how putting girls in youth prison is basically like throwing women into male prisons. Their alternative, which…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:10 PM
-1

One thing I do want to point out is I tried my best to find any male equivalent of what happened in the provided new article. What surprised me was that almost all cases of intimate relationship with prisoners are done by female officers. I could only find two cases of male officer having intimate relationship with female prisoners. One is an officer grooming teenage prisoners, and the other one is an officer explicitly exploiting prisoners by forcing them to have sex with him and put on sex dan…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 04:58 PM
0

True, true. I can see where it comes from
/r/MensRights05/03/25 04:12 PM
4

So basically a prison officer had sex with an inmate and got a 21-month sentence. I fail to see how this is related to man's rights unless you're arguing the judge went easy on her with the charges and believed she was "manipulated" by the inmate
/r/MensRights05/03/25 09:08 AM
-10

The male suspect allegedly talked to the boy before forcing him inside the SUV and leaving the area, according to the RCPD. I don't know about you, but decades ago in where I used to live, kidnappers would pretend to be angry parents and force a child into a van. It is completely normal for a bystander to call the police when an adult forces a child onto their vehicle. It has nothing to do with gender. It's just to make sure the kid is safe
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:21 AM
1

The article is very retarded. The content in the article criticizes patriarchy, toxic masculinity, Musk and zuckberg's recent behaviors, and that sort, which is fair and good. However, the writer just has to make it about all men. She was exploiting men with that clickbait title
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:31 AM
1

Tell us the name of the bar. Post it on social media. Let other men know. We can cancel this bar
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:27 AM
1

Yeah, I really hate it when shows make testicular jokes. They are very offensive
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:25 AM
0

I don't think this article has much to do with this sub. This type of shit happens all the time. People get into arguments and accidentally kill each other all the time, especially when they have guns.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:46 AM
4

Agree, and it's also not only a gender issue. US universities have made a hobby of this kind of behavior
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:20 AM
2

Oh, this Title IX. Yeah, this is wrong. I did not know Title IX was changed. I'm sorry
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:17 AM
2

over the past nine years, BHP added a net 10,500 women and a net 3600 men The human resources team, for example, was 74 per cent female in 2018, compared to 19.9 per cent female participation across the company. The external affairs team – responsible for handling community projects, media and government relations – was 65 per cent female in 2018, while the finance department was 58 per cent female. But in the less salubrious surrounds of the South Australian outback, just 13 per cent of workers…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:14 AM
2

Can you explain it a bit more.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:43 AM
4

Yeah, I think this should be the top priority if MRA is ever going to get big enough to actually enter politics like feminism
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:39 AM
0

Wow, wow, wow. There are a lot of hot takes there. I can argue with you on affirmative actions for hours, but what is wrong with title IX? Preventing schools from making sexist programs go both ways, and it only really affects public schools
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:38 AM
3

Remove funding to any college, institute, or government program with misandrist gendered language as any part of its function. How would you determine if something is included in misandrist gendered language? If I understand it correctly, words like "dick"(when it is used to call people rude), "gay"(when it is used to call something lame), etc would be considered misandrist gendered language, right? Also, phrases like "grow a pair," "man up," "grow some balls," etc would also be considered misan…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:35 AM
29

We love to see this! More men defending themselves and suing the accusers to court. It needs to have often enough that those filthy falser accusers would not dare to ruin another person's life
/r/MensRights05/03/25 01:15 AM
2

I don't think things like this can be actually valued like this. We should address rights that should be there but isn't(child protection against circumcision, abortion rights, etc)
/r/MensRights05/03/25 12:44 AM
1

Height doesn't matter
/r/MensRights05/03/25 12:19 AM
13

Come on, Matt Walsh?
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:37 PM
-4

Come on, feminists are not our enemies. Misandrists are. Don't get the two mixed together
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:34 PM
3

I think op means on other subs
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:33 PM
8

Yeah, and most of the time, the reasons are purely religious. Men need to stand together and say no to this and other religious bullshit
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:31 PM
0

To be fair, most of middle east still kills people for gayness, and discrimination still exists in most progressive countries. I think it's just the challenges the two groups are facing are quite different
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:26 PM
1

I absolutely understand your point. Also, I am not targeting any specific group of people with this post. If I am, I would say I am probably targeting manosphere and other patriarchal groups more than anything. Not to rebutt, but I do want to mention another thing that is there are a lot of fake progressives even in progressive regions. It's like how people who are clearly misogynists disguise themselves as mra
/r/MensRights04/03/25 09:35 AM
1

Those fields are male predominant, and there are societal prejudice toward female workers in tech industries. Also, we should have programs for single fathers just like we need more programs to help male rape victims. Men and our needs have been neglected by the society since forever. I agree the society needs to take care of men more, but that is no reason not to take care of women
/r/MensRights04/03/25 06:18 AM
15

Society is changing. The more we speak up, the more we can make this world a better place
/r/MensRights04/03/25 05:29 AM
3

I am talking about more progressive region specifically. Those very conservative regions are ruled out in the premise of this post. I am not saying gay men have it better than straight men. I am just saying if progressives accept the mentioned behaviors from gay men, they should also accept it from straight men
/r/MensRights04/03/25 05:25 AM
4

Yeah, this is definitely true
/r/MensRights04/03/25 05:06 AM
1

I think I phrased it very badly, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, but policies like affirmative acts does not only look at your race. It looks at multiple factors, including family income, gender identity, disability, etc. I was trying to keep the explanation simple by only mentioning the race, but things like that are usually more comprehensive. Now, on the other hand, I think it is a valid criticism over things like female-exclusive STEM programs, and etc. I think there can definitely be be…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 05:04 AM
2

I know that society used to be very discriminative toward LGBT groups. People died, got persecuted, and got castrated for it. I acknowledge it. However, I think that today's society is different from before. LGBT groups today(at least in more progressive region) face threats and persecution more so from individuals instead of society and culture as a whole. No need to apologize for anything. I can see how my post can be very insensitive and triggering. I should've phrased everything better to be…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 04:49 AM
1

You are not affected by what happened before you were born because you did not experience it. You just read about it. Now reading about it might make you angry. Like reading about men going to war while women stayed home makes me angry. You are. If you born a black person in US, you're more likely to be born in a below-middle-class house. This is why we need those programs to help these people and prevent snowballing of economic difference between races. You find this to be bullshit. I think it …
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:48 AM
1

I did not ignore what you said. I am saying that these types of programs are meant to achieve equality of opportunity. It's just that they are still on the way. Let me give you an example, an average black person is going to have less opportunity than an average white person in USA due to generations of exploitation prior to both's existence. Is it really equality to just let them compete without giving the black person any favor? Probably, not, right? It's the same logic
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:33 AM
-11

Gender quota is an indicator on how genderly equal a government is based on the gender distribution of legislators in the congress/parliament/etc. What you described is not gender quota, and I actually doubt if it actually exists. I will be convinced if you can show me some proof of it actually existing
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:22 AM
2

saying your struggles of being a straight man is worse than being a gay man is just crazy to me I did not say that
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:30 AM
-18

STEM and so many more fields are male predominant. Of course there are special helps to women in those fields. Also, it is not what gender quota is
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:30 AM
3

I strongly disagree. In my opinion, conservatives are the one who hate people for who they are. We all know how Evangalicans hate LGBT people. We all know how they slander haitians for eating dogs. We all know how they try to take away women's abortion right. It is utterly insane to paint conservatives as better than the liberals. Sure liberals have some internalized patriarchal ideas, but conservatives are literally defending patriarchy and trying to push us a few decades backward
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:28 AM
1

Like I said, there is a sociohistorical background here. People with pre-existing disadvantages need outside helps to get out of the disadvantaged state. It's the same idea behind affirmative act and DEI. These are very important to achieving equality in the long-run
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:18 AM
3

❤️❤️❤️
/r/MensRights04/03/25 01:14 AM
-27

It's not a real thing in US
/r/MensRights04/03/25 12:07 AM
-12

Where are out choices limited? Men are still predominant in almost all professions and trades. That's literally why we have DEI
/r/MensRights04/03/25 12:07 AM
1

I am so sorry. I do not mean that. I am so sorry. What I was trying to say is that gay was no longer outright illegal. I am sorry for phrasing it in a way that neglects the homophoic issue that still exists today. I am truly sorry for overlooking that.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 06:39 PM
3

No, I was talking about gay men not being judged for feminine behaviors, hobbies, and attires while straight men got condemned for not strictly following the gender role
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:40 PM
3

I am sorry for what you experienced, and I agree people in general do not pay enough attention to male victims. However, I do want to point out that many women who made thos false allegations were punished, and society was slowly becoming aware of it. I think we are moving toward a brighter future, and I think we all need to believe in it and work toward it for it to truly come
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:39 PM
1

I can see how feminism barely contributes when it comes to helping men. Still, I wouldn't treat the entire feminism as a part of the problem since they, just like us, fight against the patriarchal society that jails us all.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:35 PM
-2

Indeed indeed. Actually, I do want to point out that feminism had changed things for men. Non-heterosexual men can live mostly without fear in today's world(unless he's in a third-world fanatic country). It is the result of fighting against the patriarchal system. I think it is essential for men to willingly free ourselves from the patriarchal standard ingrained in us if we want to truely be free. It requires not just the action of saying "no," but also the knowledge and understanding to back it…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:32 PM
2

It has never happened to me, and I would assume it is probably not the case
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:24 PM
6

Well said. It truely depicts the struggle of men in our current patriarchal culture. Sometimes I'm just sad that we got left behind and neglected in all the recent progress. But I guess it is never practical to ask others to save you.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:24 PM
6

This is what drives men away from dating women. Nobody wants to rewardlessly comply for another person's comfort. I would say the only way to change it is for men to stop pursuing real women
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:06 PM
0

Yeah, I can see how it is offensive for actual gay people. I also want to add that when a man uses gay as another word for lame, that is 100% discrimination, no excuse
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:03 PM
10

And the way I describe it is "Purse Pomeranian Homophobia." It is acceptance in trade for compliance, or "sit there and look pretty for me" type relationship. And, occasionally, "I can touch you because you're not into it." Oh, this must feel horrible. I think I get what you mean, thx. I've never experienced the what you described in the second paragraph, but I totally understand the first paragraph. I've seen it so many times. And, to be fair, I don't think there is a middle ground. They are ei…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:02 PM
3

Who haven't? I mostly try my best to be a good person and make up for it
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:05 PM
2

It can explain the female part of it. But many men also show contempt against other men with feminine traits. I think that part is more connected to internalized misandry
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:04 PM
2

Well, when a lady calls you gay, she is probably assuming you're straight, and therefore she is assuming that average straight men discriminate gay men. I think in this context, the woman does not necessarily discriminate gay men but certainly make a harmful assumption about straight men
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:02 PM
45

As a straight man from a middle class family, I've never experienced any type of privilages other than the monetary one that every middle class person experiences. I, too, got discriminated for my feminine traits and other things. Simply from experience, I can tell that hierarchy of oppression is a stupid concept that only gives people excuse not to sympathize with men
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:00 PM
6

Gay men are either treated as brothers or as abominations by straight men What do you mean by this? Also, how would you describe this kind of homophobia from many women?
/r/MensRights03/03/25 01:56 PM
3

Really, I feel sorry for you bro. I hope everything goes well for you
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:28 AM
1

I think the group you're referring to is a specific group within feminists, called TERF(trans-exclusionary radical feminist). There are many schools of feminism, and most of them are not conservative. In fact, I can't think of a single conservative feminist group except TERF
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:57 AM
3

Yeah, intersectionality, the idea that the suffering of all minorities are interconnected. It's one of the rare progressive ideas I can not get behind
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:47 AM
4

I do not believe in religious freedom and attribute a lot of male suffering to religions, so there's that.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:21 AM
9

Indeed indeed. Declawing cats is very unethical. It causes phantom pain and other side effects in the future
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:19 AM
13

What if he wants to be circumcised later on in the life? They can decide to have circumcision then. It's about letting people make their own decision instead of letting others decide for them. I also happen to believe religion should not be the justification for taking away people's autonomy and choice
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:17 AM
0

we face problems and challenges but female supremacy is far from the reality
/r/MensRights03/03/25 06:04 AM
1

Never got body shamed before, but it is absolutely wrong. Nobody should be judged for the look of their body.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:58 AM
1

hard agree!
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:54 AM
1

because 10 years ago there was a high chance I would have gotten nothing Wow, that's wild. I can't even imagine living in that kind of discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:54 AM
1

I'm just curious. You seem to be able to tell that most of the discrimination and challenges men face came from patriarchy(circumcision, msculinity, complying gender role, conscription, etc), why do you still think feminism persecute men?
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:51 AM
1

I don't see the problem of it really. You may perceive it as discriminative, but you have to understand the sociohistorical background of it. Having women on boards could help prevent income gap and other types of inequality. It also serves a purpose of boosting more women into higher management positions since it was historically a male-predominant role. In general, women having jobs and holding higher offices is not a bad thing for men. We need equality for all. So many arguments against men a…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:46 AM
1

People make fun of foreskin in media? America is a sick place, man.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:34 AM
1

How is women's rights causing boys to fall behind in education? I don't live in Michigan. May you explain it to me, thank you?
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter