TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tlaloc1979 Archive

View 2 posts and 20 comments by Tlaloc1979 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Downvoting this cause OP posted it on /r/feminism with the title "that'll teach him." Sure it was a horrible incident and such violence shouldn't be condoned ever but playing off different groups for karma is bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:37 AM
2

I took it just trying to be funny.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:21 AM
1

Then sounds like getting a law against gendercide put in place is something that needs to get done. Sucks that you have to be that specific with it though, as if it's all or nothing at all.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:05 PM
2

I get that it was a moral argument and appreciate he was convicted. Problem is the argument while successful is morally reprehensible. It couldn't just be that the bastard had all those men and boys of one particular ethnic background killed for his racists ideas. They by themselves weren't enough. It had to be tied into what someone else got out of having them around. I mean can you imagine if an African village was attacked and only the women and girls were killed and the prosecutor of the cri…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:52 PM
2

The thing is it's a vague and bad argument and it's demeaning to men. It's saying that men only have value through the concept of "patriarchy," a vaque concept that even feminists can't emperically define, let alone agree upon.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:03 PM
1

I prefer the following reviews of Sarkeesian's work. Anita Sarkeesian Part 1: The College Graduate Anita Sarkeesian Part 2: Burqa Beach Party EDITED Formatting
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:31 PM
1

Well that's just not true, you're bending the game to fit your argument and doing it poorly at that. That's the point. You can reduce anything down to it's trophes and stereotypes and bash it but it's not a fair review of the subject in question unless you consider the bigger picture and other points of view. That's what Sarkasian comes off as doing; reducing games to their stereotypes and beating them up based on her negative views. Any acknowledgement of good points of the games comes off as l…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:35 PM
1

Cause how she dressed defined her as a person? Isn't that sexist thing in itself?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:05 AM
1

No matter how you create a character, people will tear it apart to suit their needs. I don't know what you are referring to here. As an example, Skyrim. A sexist misogynist piece of filth. Every woman is a housewife, some chief's wife, or Jarls wife. As for the strong female characters you interact with, with few exceptions, every strong female character that you can fight in it can be torn down and reduced to property, her agency and power and self determination stripped from her with one item;…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:59 PM
2

You're presuming it's a troll. Could very well be someone on the outside of the established arguments wanting to genuinely learn more. If the board starts closing itself off out of fear of trolls wont be long before it's just as bad as r/feminism. Granted that is a slippery slop argument but we can't bitch about them doing it and then do it ourselves. We should be striving to be the best people we can be. If you think she's a troll, downvote it and let the system deal with it naturally.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:57 PM
1

So, Dworkin makes this mountain of work, her entire's life's effort with so many foul and disturbing things said about men, most of which still get taught and studied in women's studies groups from what I understand and all of it should be disregarded cause she said she didn't mean it but that she still thought that sex was violent in nature? And what kind of back handed thing is that to say? I'm also curious why you never replied to it being pointed out to you in one of your other threads that …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:43 PM
1

I included the quotes just in case you havent seen them and to give you an idea of where people get these "wacky ideas". Not to preach or expect them to convince you just cause I showed them.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:44 AM
2

I never referenced Marilyn French (I know you were just cutting a pasting). I can actually give you a dozen more quotes from Dworkin implying all men are rapists, it's a biologically engrained attribute of men to rape, and that all sex is rape. As for the rest, it doesn't matter if they are not recent because they are all praised feminists whose work is acclaimed and taught. We don't see anyone calling these women out for the hateful things they say. Hell, the Scum Manifesto is even considered i…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:31 AM
2

Ok. Found you some quotes for you. Helps I finally got home and had time to look. And I know, not in the last ten years. "I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." -- Robin Morgan, in 1974 "Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin "And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual …
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:57 AM
3

It's a matter of what they say, how they say it, and what they avoid. It's sort of like when you hear of a politican getting in trouble for saying black people need to be motivated more and black people take that as themselves being accused of being lazy. An example of the reason why people see it can be taken from a conversation I had (or tried to have, the person never replied) with someone on /r/feminism. Link to it here So, out of curiousity, how would you have interpreted what brownkata sai…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:33 AM
2

My best guess as to why feminists don't acknowledge this is because it's hard to look at stuff your own gender can get away with without taking it personally. That's the trick with any conversation that starts with the intent of making real change. You need to be open, factual, and reflective. If you think your shit don't stink, chances are that whomever is trying to argue a point with you isn't going to get very far if they can start a debate with you at all. The person who cannot allow any hon…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:56 PM
2

Ah ok. Thank you for editing and being civil.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:20 AM
0

Dude, she did put a disclaimer in there. I do agree it's generally best for everyone for a guy to err on the side of caution. An opportunity missed is a hell of a lot less awful for everyone than the possible alternative.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:54 PM
1

Um, dude, don't think she was attacking men. She was stating how women generally behave and advising men how to deal with. Also, would suggest going to you here (http://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat?feature=results_main) cause, she's a good witch, not a bad witch. You can put away the bucket of water.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:52 PM
4

You can say BDSM is misogynistic but that would be ignoring all the people that go for the opposite gender spectrum; female Dominates, male submissive, and the entire transgender community there it. There's adults expressing themselves consensually how they so desire. I find it absurd the feminists, a group build on the idea of "we don't want to be treat this way" now want to preach to others how they should treat each other while offering absurd, ignorant, outdated, and resentful views of how m…
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter