TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TomwaIvory Archive

View 20 posts and 2,102 comments by TomwaIvory on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
560

ProgressTomwaIvory/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:30 AM
49

Action Op.TomwaIvory/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:00 PM
18

DiscussionTomwaIvory/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:38 AM
18

Edu./Occu.TomwaIvory/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:23 AM
18

Edu./Occu.TomwaIvory/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:34 AM
16

TomwaIvory/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:28 PM
16

Action Op.TomwaIvory/r/MensRights14/04/15 09:56 PM
14

FeminismTomwaIvory/r/MensRights16/11/17 11:44 PM
14

Action Op.TomwaIvory/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:37 AM
10

Social IssuesTomwaIvory/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:36 AM
9

Activism/SupportTomwaIvory/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:50 PM
9

TomwaIvory/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:40 AM
5

TomwaIvory/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:45 AM
5

DiscussionTomwaIvory/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:11 AM
5

QuestionTomwaIvory/r/MensRights16/09/14 04:52 AM
2

TomwaIvory/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:08 PM
2

GeneralTomwaIvory/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:56 AM
1

TomwaIvory/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:26 AM
1

DiscussionTomwaIvory/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:50 AM
0

TomwaIvory/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:56 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,102 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Schools have a dress code, boys have one too and it's FAR FAR LESS permissive than yours is. If you want to dress like a skank then drop out and be the whore you wanna be. It's not a human rights issue and you need to get the fuck over your skank ass.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 12:10 PM
3

Yeah, it's women that need help. After all they only get custody 93% of the time right? What a load of horseshit.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:55 AM
5

Your rights end where someone else's rights begin. If I'm a satanist can I carve a pentagram into my child's flesh? No? Yeah didn't think so. Judaism is no different. Circumcision is assault (physical AND sexual in the case of a bris) and should be absolutely forbidden.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:44 AM
7

Feminism was never good.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:40 AM
0

I. Both men and women carry financial obligations to their child should it be born. However, effects and consequences of abortion are much more severe for women. You should see the effect it has on the child, pretty horrific. Tearing them limb from limb with forceps and such. The fact of the matter is this, women are given countless methods of abandoning children without consequence. They can: 1) Abort the child, demand it be paid for by tax payers (most of whom are men). 2) Abandon the child un…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 05:35 AM
2

1) Not a Men's Rights Issue. 2) He's a convicted felon, who was caught selling Cocaine. Perez pleaded guilty to a drug charge after handing a case containing cocaine to an undercover officer in 2008. He's a piece of human garbage that should remain locked up indefinitely. Throwing him out of the country is a minor punishment, he should be banned from reentry as well.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 05:23 AM
14

Men/Boys do not commit suicide bbecause they're told to man up. They commit suicide because when they seek assistance for most anything (Homelessness, Education, etc.) they are dismissed as their problems aren't "important enough" there's always some poor oppressed woman somewhere that needs help. Add to that the demonization men face from feminism and state and yoy have a percect recipe for suicide. "Man up" is just a way for society to politely say "We don't care about You because you're not a…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:08 PM
1

Truly a moral quandary.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:52 AM
5

Yes, I believe the word means it's definition. I don't believe the word means the nonsense you'd like it to mean. You're race baiting nonsense doesn't define words, stop stomping the life out of language just because it doesn't suit your narrative. Regardless if you think defending violent criminals who abducted and tortured a man is going to help you then you're beyond help.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 12:28 AM
6

"Thug" "a violent person, especially a criminal." Are you denying this person is a violent criminal?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 11:24 PM
2

I hope as a feminist she's happy and realizes that her movement is a huge part of why this is the case among men. Feminism is founded upon a hatred for men So I'm sure she's ecstatic.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:58 AM
6

In a noble society yes. Let me know when you find one.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:46 PM
15

Infanticide is a lesser form of murder made to acknowledge the number of women who murder their young children. Basically it's the baby equivalent of a "crime of passion" like what they use to get away with killing their husbands.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:06 PM
10

"Infanticide" is literally horseshit. It's murder, violent murder. I've had depressions many times and never have I killed someone. Infanticide is just a "A woman decided to kill her baby and well she IS a woman" charge, it's made to get women off the hook.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:06 PM
2

Venezuela isn't a prefect example. Ah the old "PERFECT SOCIALISM\COMMUNISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED!"
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:48 PM
1

what exactly are the benefits of ending net neutrality? ISPs are provided a venue to provide acceleration (rather than the one single slow lane we currently have) to companies - which they pay for. This allows such companies to expand their gigabit copper and fiber networks. This paired with enforcing our anti-trust laws (wish reddit would start pushing THAT) will result in lower prices and higher speeds. Google spent over $180 million dollars trying to lay fiber and they cover a tiny portion of…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 07:39 PM
1

Had me all the way up to #10 #3 feels silly and forced and a lot of the others would be better shown by actions than words. I'd say #4 and #8 are probably my favorites.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:04 PM
1

At the expense of any business they don't like. The FTC maintains control, the only significant change with this repeal is shifting control from the FCC to the FTC. The FTC can still enforce regulation for anti-consumer practices. You're saying ISPs should be able to crush any website they don't agree with and that will be a good thing. How so? This literally never happened. Net Neutrality is only a few years old, why did this never happen prior? It's because it's bad business. You seem to have …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 03:35 PM
1

(3rd wave western) feminists Feminism has always been toxic, it's not just the third wave.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:30 PM
1

We're generally talking about the "Toxic Masculinity" types of behavior. The "Violent men are normal" behavior we see routinely from feminism. But the socialization of men is such that even a good man – a supportive man, a respectful man, a trusted man – has within him the potential for violence and harm because these behaviors are normalized through patriarchy. Tidbits like this: So when you enter a space – any space – as a man, you carry with yourself the threat of harm https://everydayfeminis…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:29 PM
1

I disagree with him, his post is childish and nonsensical. But isn't this entire thread more than a little cynical?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:23 PM
2

Hello! I'm not too sure if this is suitable for this subreddit but I'm currently a 17 year old female hoping to study law in university and also hoping to advocate for the rights for male in the future. Neat. Good luck to you. Firstly, I'm not insulting anyone of you by saying that you guys will get upset if a woman advocates for you guys but I'm just genuinely curious as to how males feel about it? This is a falsehood, if you truly advocate for Men's Rights (not any of this "Toxic Masculinity" …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:22 PM
1

Again, you're wrong. The democrats seek to concentrate political power so that they funnel money from the people to themselves. They are socialists, they want big government that controls the people.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:57 PM
1

I guess that could be plausible, though I haven't seen sources for this. Hold on let me find the source real quick. Edit: Thought I had it book marked. I remember it was linked to in a discussion on homosexuality\heterosexuality and child abuse (I was in a discussion on whether or not homosexuals were more likely to abuse than heterosexuals) If I find it I'll update the post.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:37 PM
1

I mean, if you're ok with 25 year old women showering with young girls, then why should men suddenly be an issue? Children are most often abused by members of the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:25 PM
1

I agree, but most of them aren't supporting those organizations.. least those I'm talking about don't that I know of. Do they ever do anything to stop those organizations? I'd bet good money that they don't. I've never seen ONE "feminist" counter-protest of the so called radicals. It's the "No True Feminist" fallacy and it's not going to fly. The movement is defined by it's actions, not by individuals who don't even participate. Most women are not feminists, feminism is dying even among women, p…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:22 PM
1

Feminism is an ideological hate group. Were those "feminists" politically active? I highly doubt they were as their actions fly in the face of feminist theory and practice. Have those women ever done anything to help men other than give lip service to men's issues? Do they push the same "Patriarchy" and "Toxic Masculinity" talking points? I'm not saying anything here except 'feminist' to many feminists (well my interactions were with 28-38 peers) really is about equality. Equality to many femini…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:20 PM
2

She should lose her medical license and be barred from the practice.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 12:53 PM
1

Pass was not denied, read the edit at the bottom of the article.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 12:53 PM
1

By paying they'd finance the spread of high speed cable (ISPs would have to compete to provide faster connections to these businesses) ties this all up with actually enforcing our anti-trust laws against ISPs with regional monopolies and you have an actual solution. "Net Neutrality" is not a solution that can be obtained via regulation.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 12:36 PM
3

This subreddit shills just like the others do.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 12:34 PM
5

You dipshits have no idea what Net Neutrality is. Most of you probably don't even realize it's only a couple years old.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 12:33 PM
1

Democrats are capitalist. You are drinking koolaid from conspiracy theory sites. "Democratic-socialists" weird that it's not "democratic-capitalism" isn't it. Keep shoving your head up your ass, if I'm "drinking koolaid" then you must be snorting the powder.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:32 PM
1

1) I'm not reading a book off Amazon, stop shilling your books here. If you have an argument then make it, don't be a coward and hide behind a pay wall. 2) Nothing you've said has ever been proven. Corruption is massively worse in Communist\Socialist countries - Venezuela is a perfect example of this, their leader eats on TV while the people starve: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2017/11/04/draftsocialist-venezuelan-president-eats-empanada-during-tv-broadcast-while-his-n-n2404838 It …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:31 PM
1

Open borders is free market capitalism. No borders no country. Your country doesn't exist if you believe the billions of people outside your country have just as much of a right to alter it as it's citizens. There is no communism in the american system whatsoever. More delusion, nice. The american system goes to war with socialist or communist countries, clandestine, economic etc. Yes we went to war with socialists because they were committing genocide, we went to war with communists because the…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 01:19 AM
2

Oh yeah Socialism is great, the Nazis loved it. When those countries go the way of Venezuela you'll see the end result of socialism. I wonder if they'll be happy then :)
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:28 AM
2

The US already went through this in the late 19th century. President Harding wrote in his diary that America had become a government of, by and for corporations. Yes, because of the expansion of government power and growth of the size of government. Fast forward to today and wealth inequality is worse than it was during the gilded age. Inequality is not an issue, you want to make as much as Steve Jobs? Then invent something new and shut up. Inequality of opportunity is an issue, cronyism is an i…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:06 AM
2

You got problems, dude. Lulz, I'll just identify as having none. Problem solved right? /S Really, really real problems You're very very delusional. Considering the number of things that you depend on that are "delusions" - like "justice" and "property" - you need to admit the truth. Justice and property are not delusions, a man pretending to be a woman is deluded. Then again what do I know, I'm just a giraffe, the pope, and Emperor of Rome. You don't like trans individuals because they behave in…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:04 AM
1

Lol corporations and banks run America, not "communists." Yes, cronyism is a problem but it's more of a problem with more powerful government. The more government can grant favors the worse the corruption and the richer the politicians. This is why socialist countries like Venezuela have very rich politicians and very poor citizens. Corporations and banks only run America thanks to big government and corrupt politicians.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:10 AM
1

Can I state an unpopular opinion? The letter from the victim changes things, much like that of the douchebag swimmer whose name currently eludes me, it indicates that the victim suffers lesser damage from the incident. This lessens the punishment aspect and limits internment to the prevention of re-offense which given her criminal record was evidently not high. I'm not happy with the outcome either.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:32 PM
5

1) Advocating for open borders and mass immigration of poor people from developing countries to lower the cost of labor in western countries. I don't think this is why they're doing this, I believe it's more about focusing political power and usurping the country - turning America socialist\communist wherein these democratic politicians will wield tremendous power over others.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 11:28 PM
1

More "trans" thinking. Reality: You're in $30k of credit card debt Trans-denial: I identify as not having any debt, respect my nonsense! Yay, make believe!
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:27 PM
1

This would all be relevant if you weren't pulling your assumptions out of your ass. Please, find me references from medicine where the correct isn't to treat the now monopedal person as normal, and to treat them as bipedal if they are wearing some form of prosthetic. Oh yeah, medical institutions LOVE pushing the idea of living in denial. Medical professional push adapting and learning to cope, not "Pretend you have two legs". Part of giving them a prosthetic requires them to admit they have one…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 10:26 PM
1

No, it's just a fantasy they like to imagine.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 04:41 AM
3

They didn't mean ACTUAL regressive agendas, they meant agendas that fly in the face of their movement - i.e. custody equality. You should be alright.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 03:42 AM
8

Allocating responsibility to women would violate the victim-hood narrative.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:23 PM
6

Don't worry they allow "discussion": https://imgur.com/a/i1HuM Submit or be destroyed, "No endorsement of regressive agendas is permitted"
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:22 PM
9

You're banned now you know.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:18 PM
1

Wait, why can't we allow people to make the surgical and social changes necessary to reduce their distress with their form? You really haven't justified that position with anything more than a spurious "we can't break reality". You can do whatever you want, I'm always going to call you by your sex. It's about what you can't force me to do, you don't get to take away my right to freedom of expression and free speech. If you want to identify as a giraffe or whatever then feel free, your mental ill…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:15 PM
1

Something present in a fraction of a percent of the human populace is not indicative of the norm. It's unfortunate that they have this mental disorder, I won't pander to their nonsense. It has nothing to do with gender norms and everything to do with the falsehood of being able to "identify" as a sex you are not. Your DNA makes you male or female, a DNA test will always expose the truth. Reality will not bend to fit your delusion. If you identify as Peter Pan and throw yourself from a 10 story b…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:25 AM
1

None of what you said has any meaning what-so-ever. If you can't read then don't comment. She still believes gender is a social construct - that one can "identify" as a male or a female You cannot "identify" as male or female - end of fucking story - you are what you are born as. You can be feminine or you can be masculine - that differs by culture (but is primarily static, most cultures have dominant males for example, there's lots of failed matriarchies), you can be an effeminate male but you …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:33 AM
1

Yeah it was Donald Trump calling himself a feminist not Hillary Clinton. Oh wait it wasn't. Not to mention that feminists like Linda Sarsour are repeatedly on the democratic platform. Seriously are you trolling or just retarded?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 06:54 AM
1

Feminists are a right wing movement and right wingers aren't good at consistency. That's the most asinine thing I've ever heard in my entire life. Nice ass backwards generalization and nonsense incorrect association. What kind of dumbass do you have to be to think that Feminism is right wing?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:12 AM
1

I'm in shock knowing that we have medical professionals willing to testify that he has balls.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/17 11:19 PM
2

Except we know for a fact that the overwhelming majority of women are NOT feminists, much like we know for a fact that the overwhelming majority of men are not the monsters feminists presume them to be.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:20 PM
1

I remember being part of that lol. Maybe one day the people who push this "believe the victims" narrative will actually suffer from a false accusation and back pedal.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:40 PM
1

Feminists do not believe this so quit saying they do. They may not 'believe' it, but they're certainly willing to use it as a tool. Whether or not they mentally commit to it really isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:38 PM
5

"I understand I’m going to get hate from a lot of people and that’s something I accepted, but I don’t think it’s OK to disrespect me as female." Typical female ego, respect is earned not granted by your genitalia you dumb ho.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/17 09:27 PM
1

Grats!
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:18 PM
1

Gasp On the guardian? No way!
/r/MensRights11/11/17 09:16 PM
1

Had he grabbed her by her shoulders and tossed her ass out on the sidewalk it would've been A+
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/17 03:54 PM
1

Female Cat gets denied -> Female Cat gets abusive. https://youtu.be/e6fv9KtPGN0 Typical pussy behavior :P
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/17 02:03 PM
3

Dear god, that's mostly non-biased. If the teacher admitted that men deal more damage due to physical differences between the genders I'd crap my pants!
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:07 AM
2

Objectification is an asinine aspect of ideology - throw it in the garbage.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:43 PM
3

sex with a feminist You'd have a better time laying under a loaded cargo container.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:32 AM
1

She also looks cross eyed :|
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/17 07:45 AM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 06:05 AM
1

She knew for a fact that she'd be safe from harm - because of her sex - she was wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/17 02:59 AM
1

Please bankrupt them.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/17 10:09 AM
1

If they're going to shift responsibilities on males because they're "More physically capable", e.g. the draft, then they need to give them payment for it. People like her almost certainly think men should die in the draft without recompense.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/17 09:41 AM
1

Should've gotten 15 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/17 09:35 AM
157

He acted entirely fairly. He has nothing to rationalize or apologize for, he treated her just like he'd treat a man. She however tried to use her sex as a way of abusing others, that's repulsive. She earned that, any harm done is well deserved.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/17 09:28 AM
2

Every time something like this happens I vote all republican. In 2016 I voted republican all the way down the ballot - the rate it's going I'll be voting republican until I die of old age.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:47 AM
20

"pretty much" You're being far too generous.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:42 AM
19

Your statement is so asinine it's hilarious. Western Women are the most pampered and privileged group of people in the world. Suicides, homelessness, workplace deaths, war deaths, draft deaths. All mostly men. Add to that that men and boys are a minority in most every form of education (while women continue to get affirmative action) and that far more federal aid is given to women than men not to mention agenda items devoted to women over men. Hey where's MensHealth.gov? Strange there's a Womens…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:38 AM
1

She should get jail time.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/17 10:57 AM
8

No I agree, it was PPD. The denial was just excessive which I think we may be in agreement on. I would've loved reading about "Woman steals from store - banned from all stores in the area." with a clip of her smug ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/17 10:51 AM
20

Meh violence isn't the answer, should've called the cops and had her ass dragged out. Take her picture, plaster it on the wall - humiliate her, shame her - pass the poster on to every other shop owner. The goal should be to devastate her reputation and make her known for what she is - a thief - not to beat her.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/17 10:45 AM
1

Women are the majority of voters, the "women aren't represented argument" is laughable because I see men acting like good dogs in Congress lol. They choose people who obey.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/17 07:05 AM
1

Same reason men are the majority of our representatives are Men while Women are the majority of voters - they choose people who are tools.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/17 07:03 AM
6

Glad they decided not to be jellyfish.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 08:39 AM
2

Had she set herself on fire it would've been better PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 04:34 AM
30

So you're saying girls should have 2x the opportunities as boys. Seems pretty sexist to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 04:30 AM
2

In his head he's yelling "Please god deport me"
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/17 09:01 AM
1

Sorry thought I was arguing with one retard not two. You both sound exactly the same, must be the liberal hive mind. I've given you your credit: Asian people are privileged, I didn't know that sorry.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 08:55 AM
2

Congratulations, you've officially been recognized as an intelligent human being. Welcome!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/17 08:37 AM
1

I love this story. It has such a beautiful ending. If this were read to me as I child I'd ask "What happened to the horrible feminist lady afterward?" and hope to be told "She died alone due to obesity, in a house that smelled strongly of cat piss."
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/17 08:35 AM
10

She's a rapist.....
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/17 08:05 AM
1

Sorry buddy I have a life, you've proven Asian privilege you're right. Don't worry, liberal universities are definitely not anti-free speech either. For example consider my crazy nazi right wing news source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/20/us/campus-free-speech-trnd/index.html Oh wait that's CNN. Let's try again. The notion that hate speech should be suppressed is increasingly prevalent. Only about a third of students in the survey said hate speech should be protected by the First Amendment. Almos…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 07:58 AM
0

It's not really a cop out to not have a definitive answer to a question I have no background information for. I get that you really want to fish for a certain answer to make your point, but it's pretty dumb to expect me to have insight on a class I know nothing about in a school I know nothing about with roughly 0 supplementary info I'm not asking for a statement of truth, I'm asking your belief on the matter. We've seen many examples of these types of classes and we know much about the 'safe sp…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:26 AM
3

Part of not being real scientists.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 12:24 AM
5

I guess it would depend on the class? That's a bit of a cop out, do you believe this class would, do you believe most liberal colleges would? I would certainly hope people wouldn't censor data that interrupts their narrative Yes but what do you believe? or cough cough whine about it on certain subreddits Not sure what this is in reference to.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 12:24 AM
6

Question: Do you think this class would show the same slide with regards to black\white homicide offenders? Given black males account for more than half of all homicide offenders.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 12:14 AM
2

I quoted that study you moron. The problem is that people like you can't read the study yourselves, you need Buzzfeed style articles. Why haven't you addressed the fact that Asians get the most "preferential" treatment in your flawed study? Nor the fact that it had a ridiculously small sample size and that no external variables were accounted for? Again, you've proven asian privilege to me (not really, your study like most "social" studies is a joke) congratulations!
/r/MensRights25/10/17 09:56 PM
2

In all, the experiment yielded data on more than 1,500 encounters between volunteers and drivers. Nearly two-thirds of the volunteers’ pleas were successful, but the rate at which they were granted differed greatly across ethnicities. White participants were given a lot more leeway than black ones:72 percent of white subjects were allowed to stay onboard, while only 36 percent of black ones were. The rate for South Asian subjects was around 50 percent, and for East Asians it was 73 percent. You'…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:35 AM
2

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/2015/02/Screen_Shot_2015_02_25_at_3.59.37_PM/270e4daa3.jpg ASIAN PRIVILEGE AGAIN :O From your same link, guess our Asian founders are to blame. How can you repeatedly cite graphs showing Asians at the top and screech "WWWWWWHITE PRIVILEGE!!!!" Liberal "bias" studies are now and always have been a laughing stock in the scientific community, much as how Gender Studies is a goddamn joke to anyone who hears the word. In all, the experiment yielded d…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:33 AM
2

"I don't participate but cater to meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! You're beeeeeing toxic and hurting my feefees :("
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:29 AM
2

No amount of evidence will satisfy a person who is determined to remain woefully and/or willfully ignorant. Yes that /opinion/ link you gave was totally fact, thanks guy. We live in an era where, unfortunately, evidence based argument is useless Yes, my gender is Giraffe, your party taught me that :) because a great many people would ignore critical thinking in favor of political thinking. Yes, literally all liberal universities. You know...the ones shutting down debate and running into safe spa…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:28 AM
2

"/opinion/" noun: opinion; plural noun: opinions a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. When will we get you people to differentiate between your opinions and fact?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:26 AM
2

Inequality does not equate to racism. Fact: Asians are the highest earners in the U.S. This liberal "White devil" narrative (Which cost you the election by the way) is provably false even with the images of the article you cited: https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/noy2kz8frqcrlp9hy4tg.png Guess that's "Asian Privilege"? Side Note: I'm not going to sit here and wait out the timer to reply to each of your asinine google search results to leftist blogs/articles. If you want them resp…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:25 AM
2

"social psychology" LOL. 106 is a meaningless sample size, linking to a summary of students research isn't the same as linking to a peer reviewed empirical study. Also what is with you leftists that prevents you from linking to top level sources rather than these buzzfeed article style summaries? (Not to mention that most Universities are overwhelmingly liberal, that's why there's such a problem with them opposing free speech).
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:21 AM
2

Gee, wasn't aware Einstein was still alive! You should be less trapped in the past, segregation isn't around anymore. Your racism is inexcusable, the racism of the past doesn't excuse your racism in the present.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:18 AM
1

I'd like to imagine it was a dragon kick.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 05:14 AM
1

I'm just curious and so I asked. I take the experience of the people around me which helps asses my view. Of course I can't prove anything they've said to you, nor wether their stories are even true. TL;DR: "I believe everything I hear"
/r/MensRights25/10/17 04:29 AM
1

You're saying a white man who's a vegetable doesn't have white privilege over a black man in the same position? I think it's time to brand leftist ideology a religion (a racist one at that), takes far too much mental gymnastics to participate.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 04:29 AM
2

"That's Illegal" Uh no?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 04:25 AM
1

Mens Rights Activist, usually people who are pissed off about male suicide rates, unfair family courts, unfair alimony, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 04:20 AM
29

Wish I could sign but I'm from the U.S. Is there a party like NOW that fights against such things over there?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:40 AM
2

judge people because of things they say and do Most women oppose the feminist movement as do most men. People are judging the movement based on it's actions.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:40 AM
0

Feminism is an ideological hate movement, it is not now and never was about equality. It has repeatedly spread falsehoods about history particularly regarding the vote.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:38 AM
2

"I don't usually participate, but I'm the community guys!"
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:36 AM
1

Well that explains that. It's a very real thing in the U.S. but then again the U.S. has some extreme race issues compared to most countries. Yeah, no. Nothing about this statement is true.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:36 AM
0

Isn't it amazing how you racists keep making claims while repeatedly failing to prove them even once?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:35 AM
1

Do you have any evidence of the concept? Other than the fact that the concept is founded on the foot of racism i.e. "All white people are the same, all white people are privileged"
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:34 AM
2

Considering you've given no evidence, have admitted it doesn't apply to all of those with a certain skin pigment, and you've done nothing other than screech at white people I'd say there's plenty of evidence to dismiss you - just like democrats were dismissed in November 2016 and most every election since.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:33 AM
2

but that doesn’t mean it’s absolute and applies to every white man in every situation. "White privelege!" Me: "Does it apply to all white people?" "Well uh no." Well great discussion Einstein. Tell me about "Asian Privelege" next, they're the highest earners in the U.S. after all.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:32 AM
0

Funny thing about ideas: Most of them are stupid. An idea held without fact backing it is just religion.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:30 AM
1

Do you honestly think he has any? He has ideology, it's tantamount to religion - he doesn't "need" evidence. In the Oppression Olympics the facts never win.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:29 AM
1

Because you could be nothing more than a white torso with a head - essentially a high functioning vegetable and still have some neanderthal racist leftist screeching about how privileged you are because you're white.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:28 AM
1

To relate it to other homeless people, it's probably fair to say this guy gets treated better than a homeless black man or has an easier time than a homeless woman? No. Literally no evidence of this exists anywhere. Last I checked they all had to struggle just as much, you'd have to be racist/sexist to believe otherwise. You'd also be blind: 62% of the homeless are male, women receive most federal aid.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:27 AM
0

Get over yourself. Have all the down votes I can give. The post is valid and heart breakingly true.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:25 AM
94

I also entered this very thread for that very reason. She's a piece of crap in general, she shouldn't be idolized due to one incident of not crappy behavior.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:17 AM
1

Well, we didn't even get to hear the guys side of the story. His side of the story is "He denies the rape". So how can we know the truth if we only know one side? How can we dissect and analyze her testimony without his for comparison? And based off of this article, "the hearing continues" So you're just allergic to looking up evidence that invalidates your own anti-male opinions. He was cleared, it's over - your argument was horseshit and all those making it were dismissed from court. All he ha…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:21 AM
1

1) The media won't report his side thoroughly because the news is heavily liberal, they have an agenda to fill and it's not one centered around equality. http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/22/man-cleared-of-raping-woman-who-woke-up-on-top-of-him-6947386/ His story wasn't told for the same reason his face was plastered everywhere but not hers - they wanted to ruin him because he's male. All I said was y'all are defending a guy without enough evidence He is innocent until proven guilty, given that the cas…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 02:18 AM
3

Gone is the "We're following policy" excuse.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:12 AM
6

We just won a huge victory, so let's be happy! Yeah, but what if we could eradicate feminism and it's anti-male systems entirely?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:12 AM
1

Victory screech!
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:10 AM
1

In her story, In her make believe story, her allegation which was just laughed out of court by judge and jury. See you can make up all kinds of stories, but her story also alleges she was sober and he was drunk. In his version he was also unconscious. My question is why was she raping an unconscious drunk man? You just hate men, you won't believe him in any manner while believing every word that leaves her mouth.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:07 AM
2

Last I checked a sober person attacking a drunk person wasn't acceptable either. Just because he's drunk doesn't mean she can rape him. I'm picturing it as an opportunistic guy taking note of the proximity of his penis to the girl he fantasizes about, and sliding it in while she's asleep Yes, you're presuming guilt. You are assuming that since he's a male he's a rapist. You're a bigot. What really happened: They went to a party, she saw some guy she liked kissing another girl. She got upset, the…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:05 AM
1

A man blacks out to alcohol, a woman - who insists she wasn't drunk - is moved by the man who also claims to have been unconscious. 1) Why do you believe HER claim that she was unconscious and not his. (Hint: It's because you're a bigot) 2) How does a "not drunk" person not notice being rolled over onto another person and fucked? Your head is up your ass, but it doesn't matter, the courts cleared him because fortunately the jury can tell fact from fiction.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:01 AM
1

No, because alcohol doesn't entirely remove agency the same way that literally being unconscious does. Alternative version of events: He was unconscious, she climbed on top of him and raped him. The court cleared him because her story (which you seem to keep forgetting is an ALLEGATION) is horseshit and it would take a mentally retarded vegetable to think it was possible.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:59 AM
1

entirely something that the courts should handle. The courts have cleared him of all wrong doing, her story was bullshit and anyone who thought it even partly made sense is a dumbass. If we swap the genders, we would still be calling it rape. No we wouldn't, in fact many high profile feminists don't even think males can be victims of rape i.e. Mary P. Koss. A guy getting drunk with a woman and finding her fucking him in his sleep would most definitely be rape Two drunk people having sex is not r…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:58 AM
1

the point of the story is that SHE WOKE UP TO HIM FUCKING HER She woke up to consensual sex, which she regretted (and almost certainly initiated), her regret doesn't make it rape.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:54 AM
1

or you could read the fucking article, and realize that she fell asleep watching a movie with him, and woke up to him fucking her. The only way you could possibly believe that is if: A) You're fucking retarded. and B) You believe everything a woman says. Women lie, she lied, her story is bullshit. The case has been closed and he's been cleared.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:53 AM
2

He was cleared, because her story was nonsense at best: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4909300/Former-student-accused-rape-female-friend-cleared.html
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:51 AM
1

My point still stands here. Not enough factors are known to draw up a defense for this guy. The guy is innocent until proven guilty, her story was shitty at best. The courts have cleared him of all wrong doing, they had sex, she regretted it and chose to try and cover herself by ruining his life.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:50 AM
1

Keep defending him because you want to think drunk women Whoa, are you admitting she's a fucking liar? She claims she wasn't drunk. BTW he was drunk too, are you saying it was fair for her to rape him?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:49 AM
1

Technically the court declared her a liar ;) The man's been cleared, a sleeping - but not drunk - person doesn't not wake up when they're moved, she was drunk and so was he. They had drunked sex and she decided that she regretted it so she screamed rape. Case Closed.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:46 AM
1

Case closed motherfuckers. I laughed, it really was a simple case.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:42 AM
1

The courts have decided, he's been cleared. Are you happy now?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:40 AM
1

If I saw an article that said "White people should never go to jail - for anything" I'd be disgusted. The fact that the website allows (indeed pays) for such things shows how far Feminism has gotten.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:40 AM
1

Yep, I saw. Her story was broken, sucks that she regrets her actions while drunk but the lesson should be to not binge drink.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 06:38 AM
1

She could potentially have some sort of mental disorder?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:38 PM
2

I'll give a fuck about the "suicidal ideation" of women who've had drunken hookups when men\boys aren't the majority of suicides. How about that?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 07:53 AM
2

Yep, my bad it's late and I'm studying for an exam. Didn't read much into that quote.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 07:51 AM
1

I'm glad you were, sorry it's the internet shit can be weird sometimes. Sorry for coming of as a pretentious prick.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:37 AM
0

but ultimately well-meaning one Feminism is not well-meaning, nothing about Patriarchy Theory is "well-meaning". Feminism is and always was a hate movement.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:32 AM
2

It's a farce created by feminists. No more than lip service at best, but far closer to doing outright harm in reality.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:30 AM
1

Their dogma makes perfect sense...under the presumption that men and boys are not people.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:46 AM
0

Rational people appreciate the complexities of social movements; you clearly do not. Feminism is not so complex. They fought for the vote yet allowed men to be drafted without the vote until the 26th Amendment - feminists like Emmeline Pankhurt even used White Feather campaigns to shame draftees who returned safely. They routinely fight against equality, the push "Patriarchy theory" which excludes male victims and female perpetrators. Feminism is a hate movement, it's a "dirty word" for a reason…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:45 AM
1

If you're standing on a boat, and that boat is filled with holes and everyone else on board issues proclamations that the boat is sea worthy then wouldn't you take the life boat? Feminism is dying, it's becoming less and less popular. We're watching people abandon a sinking ship.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:40 AM
1

She dared to violate the dogma and so she was put down. Peace be upon her.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:37 AM
2

Quora is a garbage sight.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:36 AM
1

Step 1) Abolish Feminism. Step 2) Everyone is now safe from the nonsense feminism brings. Step 3) Everyone is happier.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:35 AM
2

Where was it marked news? This subreddit is called /r/MensRights not /r/MensRightsNews History is important in understanding the movement and understanding the harm feminism has done to society.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:30 AM
2

5th is remaining silent I do wish feminists would use that right more.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:29 AM
1

Puh-lease. When you have a robot that can work a 9-5 job and the woman gets paid for it (Never gonna happen, when there's robots in the workplace they're going to be owned by massive corporations) then we can talk. Now a female robot would go over well for the males - you'd like see marriage rates cut dramatically.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:26 AM
1

Feminism: "What you want to hear about real issues? Like loss of custody, false rape accusations, homelessness, or lack of a father due to bigoted policies put in place by us?" Feminism: "Nah we'll just pretend the real cause is not getting a butterfly on your face, yeah you'll do much better later. Then we can drink your male tears while you kill yourself" Feminism needs to die so real issues can be addressed.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:22 AM
1

The courts will throw it out, because her case is laughable. I'd put my money on it.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:01 AM
1

Alas it seems /u/cassalata has checked out :(
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:00 AM
2

"Wow, women don't have all the privileges! I mean okay we have more but that's not really enough!"
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:57 AM
2

Mary P. Koss argues that Men\Boys can't even be victims of rape by a woman.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:38 AM
1

But yeah...I can't be bothered for an argument. I genuinely didn't mean to insinuate anything. Perhaps I was a bit too flippant in my first comment. No harm done, just trying to make sure I don't get branded as supporting something I'm not. But if you're determined to be offended by that, which i think you might be, then whatever. Nope, everything's all cleared up, I don't know why we have such a hard time communicating but it's resolved.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:36 AM
3

You all don't hate women The only reason people believed otherwise was feminism. Feminist logic goes like this: Feminist: Feminism represents all women. [Hint: they don't, they represent a small minority even by their own admission: https://www.vox.com/2015/4/8/8372417/feminist-gender-equality-poll] Feminist: Feminism is about equality. [Hint: It's not: Feminist organization NOW (National Organization for Women) fights against default shared parenting keeping children from their fathers. http://…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:34 AM
6

Feminists said it on feminist websites where feminist news is disseminated regularly. Though I do realize in true Feminist fashion you're playing the "No True Feminist" [No True Scottsman] fallacy. Yes no "true" feminist would do that you say, except all the feminists who do and all the feminists who do nothing to stop them. Feminist organization NOW (National Organization for Women) fights against default shared parenting keeping children from their fathers. http://www.nownys.org/archives/leg_m…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:28 AM
3

yeah alright, alright keep your pants on... I'd be less hostile if you weren't insinuating I (or the subreddit in general) believe that raping unconcsious women is okay (while strangely ignoring that he too claims he was unconscious): Cos it seems like you're saying on the one hand, people don't think she was sober. But then, if she wasn't sober, he could have raped her while she was asleep. I don't like when people insinuate that I support such behavior, I imagine you don't like it either. It's…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:25 AM
6

why should feminists care about those issues if you don't care about their issues? Women have no issues, women are the most privileged group of people in the western world. Any issue should be looked at from the perception of both genders i.e. "Is this fair" not "Is this what women want" "feminism is the focus on the injustice women face because of the patriarchy." 1) It's interesting how you only apply the definition of feminism when you dogmatic sociopaths deem it acceptable (just another exam…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:21 AM
10

Seconded just bury them in some unmarked hole.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:11 AM
12

Deep down, they think punishments should be for men only. I mean it's not even that deep, Feminism is just a bigoted movement, it's not even trying to be obscure. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:10 AM
2

You forgot: Don't ever mention that men have it worse. I mean, hey it worked with the vote why shouldn't it work here?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:08 AM
4

Think you meant to be in r/Feminism, this kind of sexist bullshit belongs there. Though I do hope you were being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:07 AM
9

Feminism is an ideological hate movement, feminism has not once fought for equality. Feminists won't shut up about the vote, but none of them have ever faced the draft. Few if any feminists even know what the 26th Amendment was (for the uninitiated it ensured that men - who were being drafted and killed - could vote, because prior to the 26th Amendment that was not the case) yes we hear all about "Women's Suffrage" but I've never heard of a woman choking to death on mustard gas without a vote - …
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:03 AM
7

The injustice here is that men are the overwhelming victims of discrimination in the justice system - but feminists being blind to the suffering of males - have no desire to admit that. It's not Men vs Women. It's Feminists vs Everyone who doesn't hate men.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:59 AM
4

Feminism is a hate movement, fighting against hate directly improves the world for men.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:59 AM
4

r/TwoXChromosomes thinks the smallest most insignificant issue facing women is far more important than the fact that the issue overwhelmingly impacts men. Maybe r/TwoXChromosomes can bitch about women not facing the draft and demand that affirmative action be used to rectify that injustice in future wars? They screech about the vote in that very article I bet none of them know what the 26th Amendment even did, they're all blind to the fact that they're members of the most privileged group of peo…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:58 AM
3

He has not accused her of rape. She has not proven he's done anything wrong. She is entitled to do so. But she has not done so. Hasn't stopped the papers from plastering his image everywhere along side the word "Rape" has it? There's a bias, a sickening bias, the bonus goes to the person who acts the most despicable - in this case her. Her story is flawed, and nonsense at best. The case will likely be thrown out because of how nonsensical it is but the media is tying a noose to hang the boy from…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:53 AM
2

But to me, if she was asleep, it doesn't matter if she was drunk or not. The law and literally everyone agrees with you. Cos it seems like you're saying on the one hand, people don't think she was sober. But then, if she wasn't sober, he could have raped her while she was asleep. No I'm saying her claim was bullshit. You also have to remember that (according to her story) she's a sober person and he's drunk and she's on top of him. Far more likely she's raping him based on her account than the o…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:49 AM
3

We need to make that illegal.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:23 AM
1

This is why the LAW doesn't use the word drunk, drunk sex isn't rape. The law uses the word "Incapacitated" an incapacitated person cannot consent.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:23 AM
3

Once the beer goggles wore off she was upset. Typical drunk person behavior I've known a lot of men who've experienced that, they usually don't yell "RAPE" afterwards.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:22 AM
3

Oh but she wasn't drunk, she can remember everything. Oh but she didn't wake up when a dick went into her. She was drunk, he was drunk, they had sex and she regretted it. That's the story folks.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:21 AM
2

She says she wasn't drunk anyway. Dunno what happened there... Sounds like she's lying to me.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:20 AM
1

intoxicated Are people just averse to using the legally correct term? Incapacitated, drunk sex can be consensual, you cannot have consensual sex with someone who is incapacitated.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:19 AM
2

"claimed" She also claimed that she drank but wasn't drunk. She also claimed that he fucked her but she only woke up to a laptop falling off the bed. Sounds like someone needs to not just believe everything they hear.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:18 AM
2

She drank but didn't get drunk, and wasn't drunk but claims she went to sleep willingly and didn't wake up to penetration. Sounds like horseshit to me.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:16 AM
5

So she was unconscious while he started fucking her? How can you all seriously think he didn't rape her? 1) How do you know she's telling the truth. 2) She admits to having drinks and claims she wasn't drunk but didn't wake up to penetration. Are you fucking mad?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:15 AM
2

What if you're both drunk, she climbs on top of you and then you flip her over and penetrate her? Still rape? "Drunk" is a meaningless word, the law uses "Incapacitated" for a reason. An incapacitated person cannot move. If you can move, speak, and appear lucid enough to make decisions then you're responsible for yourself don't care if that's having sex or operating a motor vehicle - you're responsible for the consequences.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:14 AM
7

She claims she fell asleep while watching Lady and the Tramp and was never drunk. No one here thinks fucking unconscious people is acceptable, I imagine many however many don't believe she wasn't drunk. She admits having drinks no sober person could have been fucked without waking up. Her story is full of nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:13 AM
1

Feminists != Women.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 08:57 AM
2

"You're making america unsafe" Last time I checked black on black homicide was the leading cause of death for black males 15-34 and #2/#3 leading cause of death for black males in most other age groups. I think cities are unsafe.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 08:55 AM
2

Mirror?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 08:39 AM
2

and women have it worse (rape victims) No. I'll give you that they are the majority of victims - but Female perpetrators get away with it wildly and male victims get no support what-so-ever.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 08:01 AM
2

Please use a link archiver.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 08:00 AM
5

I disagree with your disagreement but I upvote your respect.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 07:58 AM
1

A couple of months sooner and the liberals would've cheered for her. Maybe she should have tore the baby into pieces or crushed it's head instead?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 07:55 AM
6

Get her out.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/17 07:54 AM
2

You'd think so.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:46 AM
0

Feminism is an ideological hate movement, regardless of this one single thread the actions of the movement remain the same - men and boys are not people to feminists.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:02 AM
2

Ten years for attempted murder of a newborn baby. Doesn't the penalty go down if they're younger? Hell a few months before she was born it would be penalty free. It's just a late late term abortion.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 05:57 AM
1

Secondary and irrelevant aren't equivalent. Eugenics is bad, it's made even worse when it's targeted against a specific group (It then begins to lean towards things like genocide).
/r/MensRights21/07/17 07:59 PM
2

The women are not sterilized, they are given temporary solutions. The men are sterilized, they are given irreversible surgery. There is an irreversible surgery for women - they chose not to do it and to give women the same time reward as men. Unequal choices with equal reward - i.e. Sexism.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:35 AM
3

So you think Men should be permanently sterilized while women take a temporary solution instead of a tubal ligation? That's not only disturbing from a constitutional standpoint but from a Men's Rights standpoint.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:38 AM
1

Yet only the men are, not the women. Sounds to me like you're a sexist.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:37 AM
2

This is overwhelmingly affecting men, when it comes to men "Human Rights" suddenly excluedes them.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:37 AM
7

If women were told "Permanent Sterilization" and men were given Vasagel the harpies would lose their collective mind.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:36 AM
10

Either it's equal or it's not offered. This is nothing more than anti-male policy, you're telling me suddenly the government is concerned about costs? Why not slash some of the hundreds of worthless women's programs.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:33 AM
12

Women are given a temporary treatment. Men are given a permanent one. If I walked up to a black man and said "You can choose to have a leg removed for 30 days off" and walked up to a white man and said "You can choose to have your leg temporarily paralyzed for 30 days off" would you call those equal choices? Tubal Ligation is the equivalent of a vasectomy - the only reason it isn't being offered is sexism.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:21 AM
3

I did not know of this template. I have accepted my (checks downvotes) 96 lashings and will make sure I don't forget it in the future.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:19 PM
2

The best part is you can point out institutional sexism and they'll just screech about how it's all men who made the laws and federals orgs. Despite the fact that those men were put there by a majority female populace. Arguing with a feminist is like arguing with a brick.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 05:16 PM
3

There are a wide variety of studies showing that Men tend to have more intention of dying with regards to suicide. If these are insufficient I link a few more: Although several previous smaller studies have found no gender difference in intent scores (Dyer & Kreitman, 1984; Niméus et al, 2002), others have found higher scores among male patients (Hjelmeland et al, 2000; Haw et al, 2003). Hjelmeland et al (2000) argued that the gender difference observed in their study was due to their large samp…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:11 PM
1

Outrage culture has definitely got out of hand. Thanks for your post, I always wonder how other people think about things like that and it's rare to get such a thought out response.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:10 PM
5

A good study showing this is here: Although several previous smaller studies have found no gender difference in intent scores (Dyer & Kreitman, 1984; Niméus et al, 2002), others have found higher scores among male patients (Hjelmeland et al, 2000; Haw et al, 2003). Hjelmeland et al (2000) argued that the gender difference observed in their study was due to their large sample rendering a negligible difference statistically significant, and was therefore of no theoretical or practical significance…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:07 PM
1

Men - as people LOVE to point out when it's an argument against men - are also less likely to seek medical attention.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:03 PM
1

On the first point I couldn't confidently answer, my argument would probably do more harm than good unless I spent an hour writing my opinion. Opinions can't do harm, they're just words. Someone would have to be stupid enough to act on them if they were so flawed. I think biological differences need to be accepted and embraced, rather than being used to demonise particular genders. Seconded, but currently we have "Toxic Masculinity" and "Patriarchy Theory" which I'd say demonizes one particular …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:59 PM
4

Suicide just another instance where women's failures are equal to men's success because "equality". Men are suffering for a wide variety of reasons. It's not so much "Gender Roles" as it is being the majority of nearly every form of misfortune there is.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:42 PM
1

You've never been shamed for talking about how you feel Literally not even once, my male friends care, my female friends did not.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:39 PM
2

My attempt was due to drug use, untreated depression and lack of friends. Mine was due to being legally blind (and having developed a horrible attitude due to the harassment I received, leading me to pushing away even good people) - being freshly isolated from the few people who cared (college) - and just in general having no reason to live. I got really really really lucky.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:38 PM
1

^ This, it's literally this.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:35 PM
3

Canada and America are far different in regards to culture and size. New York is ~9 Million people or 1/4th of Canada's population.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:34 PM
1

You wait, in five years there will be some huge charity specifically for women committing suicide that will garner more attention and donations than any men's charity. To what degree do you believe Men are responsible for this, and how do we fix it?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:30 PM
5

Don't worry, I think I've taken the brunt of their outrage lol.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:28 PM
9

Sometimes we end up on r/all and it seems Feminists and other crazies enter the fold. I invoke Poe's law.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:27 PM
3

I just don't understand how you can equate 4 deaths to 1. Yes suicide is always serious, yes decreasing attempts matters, no an attempt doesn't equate to a life lost. I attempted suicide, and I can tell you that it would've been far worse for everyone had I died. At the very least someone who doesn't succeed gets a second chance - that's one more chance than people usually get.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:25 PM
1

not a case of feminists gone wild. They're not a case of feminists gone wild, they're a case of feminists acting in accordance with their ideology. idealogical hate groups who should be labelled as "anti-patriarchal" are often labelled as feminists Patriarchy theory is the core of feminism, without the big bad "Patriarchy" there is no feminism. The National Organization for Women - the largest Women's Organization in the U.S. - has engaged in rampant anti-male hatred both in regards to narrative…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:23 PM
3

Sometimes downvotes are earned.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:21 PM
3

Come back when you're willing to admit that something that kills 4x as many people is more serious. Chao.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:49 AM
12

This is one of the very few topics I believe is everyones issue because people lives are important whether you are a man or woman Yet you believe that male suicide isn't more serious, despite the fact that is FOUR TIMES AS DEADLY. I don't know what else to say Simple say this: "Men's lives are just as important as women, when 4 men die for every woman that shows that men are suffering more, if all lives are equal then a greater loss of life shows inequality and is therefore more pressing" Is tha…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:48 AM
6

I'll keep that one ;)
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:43 AM
10

I'm a proud men's rights activist and a fact-based logical thinker. "Fact based logical" -> "4 males dying is just as important as 4 women trying and failing" Oh fucking please. Then by your logic, portraying it as an issue that doesn't solely affect men will cause more action to actually be taken No you self prostrating retard, Women's groups have constantly helped women in issues men suffer from far more, you're saying "Sure go ahead and sweep males under the carpet again" You're a despicable …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:43 AM
6

I just said they are both important Suicide is important, but Male suicide is far more serious. Would you say stopping a mass murderer or a terrorist is equally important to stopping one murder? Suicide is a men's issue because 4 males will die for every female, anyone who cares about men realizes this. It's overwhelmingly male and without understanding the discrimination and bias against males (i.e. What you're displaying) we'll never lower it.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:40 AM
13

men are more important since they die more Living != Dead, the loss of life is severe, it's a shame you can't grasp that. I suppose you think people who get the flu and people who die from it are equally worth crying over? instead of saying human lives are important and everyone of them should be worried about I love it. When men are the majority of an issue it's "Oh it's everyone's issue, it's not a 'Men's issue'" when women are the majority of an issue it's "War on women" and "Women's Issues" …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:38 AM
-32

Clearly I can.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:28 AM
9

and you're whining about who's issue it is. Suicide is the #7 leading cause of death among males, it is a male issue. Just because you find it acceptable and equatable to a group where suicide isn't even a leading cause of death that doesn't make it so. If we allow disgusting, anti-male, feminist bigots like yourself to co-opt the issue men and boys will continue to be rampantly more likely to die. Just admit it: You want boys to die at a far greater rate than girls, you want them to suffer. You…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:28 AM
8

And as for your other comment is it 4 or 8 men for every wome It's 4:1, Males are 80% of suicides (not that you value their lives equally). It would be 8-2 or 4-1, I screwed up the math. When girls die equally to boys give me a call. Suicide is the #7 leading cause of death among males, by implying that's not an issue or implying that a group that isn't nearly as common has it just as bad you spit on their graves. You're a despicable and selfish person and you need to realize that. 4 doesn't equ…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:24 AM
17

You insult every female suicide victim by saying that they are not as important as men No, the ones who die are equivalent to the males who died. In your flawed man-hating world 4 dead boys is equal to 1 dead woman. I don't equate the living with the dead, you do. suicides among women is also a concern and both should be taken seriously, Both should be taken seriously, but clearly one is more serious and more rampant. You don't equate 4 people dying to 1 person dying they're not equal. instead y…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:21 AM
17

Feminists won't ever allow their ideology (flawed as it is) to swing both ways.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:08 AM
5

Today I learned that 1 woman is equivalent to 4 men. Thanks for clearing that up for me, I'm sure that will make the massive numbers of boys who kill themselves so much happier. The MRM doesn't need spineless and blind individuals, you're an insult to every male who's died from suicide.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:05 AM
16

How is it not am issue for everyone? 7 males die for every female, get your head out of your ass. Also a suicide attempt is a suicide attempt No it is not, a serious suicide attempt is one that aims to end your life. A half-assed "I just want attention" suicide attempt is one that repeatedly lands you in the hospital leading to an inflated number of "attempts". women are merely calling for attention. Because they are, they routinely choose less fatal methods, they don't want to die they want a s…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:03 AM
1

I think that goes into violating a woman's body. So you're saying that children have less value than women. There's a process involved with abortions, and, well, I reckon it's not exactly pretty thing to witness. Murder isn't pretty, women are allowed to get away with it. Also don't downplay the woman's emotional well-being post operation... Regretting murder doesn't make them good people, and it doesn't make them worthy of respect or care. They're despicable. The weight of ending a defenceless …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:59 AM
-92

Get your head out of your ass. Edit: I'm aware I was wrong, please downvote at your leisure.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:55 AM
22

Ya but its not sexism killing men It's sexism. Men constitute the majority of every form of suffering (homelessness, war-dead, loss of child custody) and are less likely to take role-model positions (i.e. Teachers) because of the reality that a male teacher who is falsely accused will not recover (female teachers can rape and assault children without concern, they have nothing to fear from false accusations because they have nothing to fear from real accusations). Feminism is an anti-male hate c…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:54 AM
29

None of that is the primary reason men and boys die to suicide. The "Muh feelings" narrative is only used by Feminists to obscure and hide the fact that men and boys constitute the majority of every societal ailment from homelessness to unemployment.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:51 AM
23

Everyone knows women attempt more suicide than men Attempts can be counted multiiple times. Women don't attempt seriously, they are merely calling for attention because they know they will receive it. Women cut their wrists horizontally men tend to cut vertically. suicide is everyone's issue. Suicide is a Men's Rights Issue, this isn't horse shoes people are fucking dying. The fact that you think a half-assed attempt equates the loss of a male life means you don't care about men and boys very mu…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:50 AM
45

Men also suffer from pretty much every societal ailment more than women. Men are the majority of the homeless, the war dead, homicide victims, etc. Add all that to the fact that Feminism engages in constant anti-male campaigns and you get young men and boys with no role models and more suffering than they can handle.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:48 AM
2

Issues are with political and cultural agenda USA bring in, at times. Americans themselves dislike the way our government gets involved in other nations, we really don't care about the Middle East (outside of protecting Israel) and yet our government has repeatedly sent forces (and other forms of intervention) into these countries. The democrat & republican parties are merging, there is no "Small government, America First, anti-intervention" party in the U.S.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:10 AM
1

Glad to see, Karen was my redpill :)
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:06 AM
1

but it's regular reasonable people who make up a majority of feminists. we just don't feel the need to spew it. The majority of women are not feminists, feminism is not now and never had been a movement about equality. You name a feminist group and I'll show you the various ways it's caused horrible damage and the myriad of hateful things they support. Feminism is a an ideological hate movement.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:05 AM
2

Don't think so. It is American /western feminist who inspire feminists in other countries, there are multitude of western NGOs working in India, politicians and laws are totally influenced by them. Something taking place in a country and something being counter to a nations principles are not the same. Feminism is a hate movement, one that should never have existed, but to imply that it's American in nature is insane. You will be unpleasantly surprised to find western feminism getting ditto copi…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:26 AM
3

What about women paying lower income tax /tax discounts ? What about lower tax request on products women use ? What about gender quotas in corporate boardrooms ? There are a lot of provisions provided to women to keep them as special snow flakes at expense of men. What about special laws which allows 50% false accusations and billions of US$ in court expenses in a poor country All of these are appalling, and they fly in the face of American principles. And hundred others... I'm talking about thi…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:12 AM
2

In this case they want men to be completely responsible for the same things they do not want to take accept responsibility for. Agreed.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:08 AM
1

go back to your safe zone scum. I invite you to post a thread criticizing the MRM or Men's Rights, or what have you. You're free to do that here (Not that discussions can't get heated) where as in any Feminist subreddit you'll be banned (r/MensLib, r/Feminism, etc.). Feminism is more of a religious cult than an activist group.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:08 AM
1

You can come here and criticize the MRM, you cannot go to r/Feminism and criticize feminism. Feminism is derided because of it's hate filled and backwards ideology, this is true not only for men but for the majority of women.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:06 AM
1

so what is ur suggestion? Have you tried r/TheRedPill? You seem to be a better fit for that community, this community is more focused on legal issues and bias.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:04 AM
2

Understand that people in different countries, have different cultures, believes and their own reasons for all this. You raise a good point. I'm not entirely certain my system of beliefs (Maximum Freedom, Maximum individual responsibility) tie well into every nation (Though I wish they did :D) So, govt. was forced to make sheds for them That sounds like a Mens Rights Issue, women getting preferential treatment because they're women. Women should provide for themselves but I suppose that not ever…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:23 AM
2

Men are the overwhelming majority of the Homeless, workplace deaths, combat deaths, etc. Not only does this lead to many boys not having a male role model (most teaches are female due to the fear male teachers have of being falsely accused of illicit activity, though you'll find female teachers get away with it on the regular) but it also means the majority have serious loss and suffering to go through. Society has deemed men & boys to be disposable.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:19 AM
1

Unless we want to outlaw women from having abortions again Preventing the death of the unborn is completely desirable, maybe we should push for grown ass adults to have self control again?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:15 AM
1

Then abortion needs to be illegal. If it is illegal to a father to so much as withdraw his money from a child then surely it must be illegal for the mother to slaughter the child.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:14 AM
1

Abortion → baby killed -> don't have to support it. Are you saying that if we changed it from "Financial support" to "Father can execute the child" you'd find it equivalent? If the woman can slaughter the child to avoid supporting it why can't the father?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:13 AM
1

The baby's brain and heart begin to form at Week 5, you're okay with crushing it's little heart? Why can't you just keep you dick in your pants?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:12 AM
1

killing babies. It is killing babies. FACT - It is a full and unique human being - A DNA test can easily verify that it has 23 unique pairs of chromosomes. FACT - It is ALIVE, it is growing of it's own free will with no instruction from the mother or father, once the egg is fertilized it will begin developing. It's language from a smear campaign against abortions Abortions are murder, abortionists are murderers, all scientific evidence PROVES that the baby is a unique human who lives of their ow…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:11 AM
1

But fetuses grow to eventually become human. Just like sperm, or an egg. A sperm or an egg will not develop on their own. A fetus IS a human being, one that will grow - of it's own accord - even outside the mothers body (This is how they perform IVF and Stem Cell research).
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:07 AM
2

Sounds pretty degenerate, you're hurting your own kid by forcing them into the fate of an awful single-mother childhood. People who screw around don't care about the consequences. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlccyaX1ueA Perhaps don't go around having unprotected sex and conceiving children out of wedlock if you don't want to be responsible for one? I wish men would follow this advice, I hate seeing them get robbed. And for your information I'm against female abortion too. Seconded.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:05 AM
1

Your deal is fine on the terms that women can't slaughter their children. You're saying "It's wrong to withdraw your money from a child you don't want" but you haven't said "It's wrong to kill a child you don't want"
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:05 AM
6

Not sure if she's part of the sub but my favorite lady is Karen Straughan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0PTjLnXmCs
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:00 AM
8

I've rarely seen a subreddit as generally well behaved and as open as r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:59 AM
4

Eh fair enough. It's not directly "Mens Rights" but at least it exposes feminism for failing to speak on real issue & brings an actual issue to light.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:56 AM
1

She needs to be voted out, I'm hoping Claire McCaskill is outed in the next election as well.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:52 AM
8

Your right to religion ends at the body of another person. You don't get to force your religion on a child.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:51 AM
7

Feminism: "Men are bad, so therefore anything Men do is bad."
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:47 AM
1

Women have the right to vote, men have the right to vote when they sign up for the draft. Prior to the 26th Amendment men were drafted without the right to vote. The narrative that Men were "privileged" has always been false.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 02:42 AM
1

Feminism gets a bad rap because it's a toxic, hateful, man-hating ideology that has literally nothing to do with equality. Feminism is not now and never was an egalitarian movement, it has always been and always will be a hate movement.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 02:41 AM
1

Women got the right to vote in 1920, WWII and Vietnam both took place afterward, men could be - and were - drafted without the right to vote. This was remedied by the 26th amendment which wasn't passed until after Vietnam. Women STILL do not have to register for the draft.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:09 PM
1

Damn, that even got me excited. Who is this Spartan Warrior?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 11:17 PM
2

As long as they don't try to take my jacket. It's like "I KNEW IT WAS COLD THAT'S WHY I BROUGHT A JACKET"
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 10:54 PM
1

Sh-sh-should we tell him.....? fat people can lose weight
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 10:43 PM
1

For starters they don't even own their own land, it's all held in trust by the government. Since they don't own their own land they live on a reservation - usually with no real income - where they can't create their own businesses (as they have nothing to put up as collateral), they also suffer from low education, alcoholism, etc. you know all the fun things that come with poverty. The most successful of them usually leave the reservation.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 09:02 PM
1

[Gets Arrested for False Report] Wait, so he really was willing to get her ice cream? That just adds insult to injury.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 08:47 PM
1

Saddest thing? You had to explicitly state that the other 10% were female. Otherwise it would end up 2% pansexual, 1% some other made up gender, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 06:56 PM
1

Can I just clarify one thing? She's not a radical feminist, she's just a regular feminist. The radical feminists call for the genocide of men.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 06:55 PM
1

The dedication to crappy audio is what makes it feel real.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 05:17 PM
1

Child will likely survive, let her give birth and then abort her.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 05:16 PM
1

Classy piece of work there.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/17 04:54 PM
8

Don't give whores money.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/17 11:18 PM
2

Right? If the case just starts to look bad for her she can just plea her way out, he still gets his life and reputation destroyed and she gets to walk away with a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:08 PM
3

We need to raise the burden of proof, it should be near impossible for this to happen. MASSIVE sanctions need to be placed on the state, investigations into the judge and attorneys need to be done. Man should get tens of millions of dollars from the state, women who falsely accuse should get sentence equal to what the man got. By weakening the sentence you say "If you take 4 years from a man you'll just get weekends in Jail, and everyone will always think he's a rapist, and he'll lose his job, a…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:06 PM
4

They should just remove the feminist pollution from the justice system. It should be damn near impossible to send someone to prison without CONCLUSIVE AND IRREFUTABLE PROOF that it happened, that was clearly not the case here.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:02 PM
4

So, punishing her would send a message to other people in the same situation. Until she does it again, and again, and again, and not to mention all the women who just get away with it, even if they're found criminally guilty through evidence alone. She should rot. "2 months, weekends only" is pointless, if she wants to avoid punishment she just won't come forward. We need to make sending people to jail for a crime they didn't commit incredibly hard, this means telling feminists to go fuck themse…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:01 PM
9

So Victim Blaming then?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:57 PM
6

The state is partially responsible, she should pay the state and the state should give him a few million dollars. He lost his job, his career, his reputation, and 4 years of earnings and experience.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:57 PM
1

A lot of girls are interested in compsci but don't take the courses offered in their HS because they'd feel uncomfortable being the only girl in the class Sounds like they need to grow the fuck up and get over it, same could be said for male nurses yet I don't see Male Nurses getting affirmative action and "Male only" classes, in fact Feminists ATTACKED that very idea: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/feb/08/sydney-university-under-fire-for-vet-scholarship-giving-preference-to-mal…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:55 PM
2

I honestly don't see any problems in a Girls Code class The problem is in the lack of a Boys Code Class, particularly when boys are already behind in every single level of education while women and girls CONTINUE to receive affirmative action. Wanting to spark an interest in STEM careers for females Who the fuck cares if they're interested? Promote INTEREST regardless of sex, if there's insufficient room for people ADD MORE ROOM, don't discriminate based on sex. Computer Science doesn't benefit …
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:40 PM
1

Firstly, I would like to question why you're so hostile with me. For starters, you're overtly sexist. You're belief is thus: "Girls should have twice the opportunity to take the class, they should have a class tailed to them, they should have a class that's open to both, they should have the opportunity to take it on Monday or Wednesday. Boys will take it on Wednesday if the Wednesday class if that is not full and they are free on Wednesday, they will also not receive a class focused on them" Yo…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:34 PM
1

The problem is there's no Boys Class. They're saying "If you're a girl you can enter this special line over here! Or you can go to the class on Wednesday. If you're a boy you just have to go on Wednesday or not go at all." Does that sound fair to you?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:03 PM
2

You're correct. Saying "We need more vaginas in STEM" is your end goal, you don't care about providing access to everyone who wants to learn. You care about Equal Outcome and oppose Equal Opportunity. To you it doesn't matter if more boys want to code, to YOU all that matters is ensuring equal outcome - even if that means denying people their education based on their sex. You are a sexist, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:00 PM
1

Frankly that's a stupid assertion given the mass availability of coding classes available to youth, in NYC, which left alone tend to be very male. So your argument is "Boys should get a shared environment not tailored to them" and "Girls should be given special treatment, despite the fact that the boys clearly want it more". Denying education on something to those who want it more sounds insidious and stupid.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:57 PM
1

where females are targeted because they are female. THEY'RE IN 2ND-5TH GRADE. Guys who can't treat a woman as an equal are just as much at fault here as women who won't take a class because they feel they won't be treated as an equal. Retard, these are not "Guys" and these are not "Women" they are little boys and little girls. they feel Feelings don't matter - they fucking don't - facts matter. Unless they're offering a Boys Coding Class, this is sexist and should be fixed.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:53 PM
1

I am in the minority here I think but this is the solution to gender discrepancy in STEM. Gender Discrepancy is not an issue, you do not need specific genitalia in STEM. Refocus the education system to encompass girls and boys. By having a Girls only Class, and having NO boys only Class? That's just sexism. You're not "encompassing girls and boys" you're "encompassing girls" and telling the boys they're not as important. But if the 'target' is for girls, I'm all for it. Do you not think Boys des…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:49 PM
1

I wonder how well this would go over: "Monday: Whites Only Dodgeball" "Wednesday: Dodgeball"
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:47 PM
1

I could see if they taught using different projects i.e. Boys program things related to monsters, ninjas, etc. Girls do, whatever the fuck it is little girls like. But as previously shown, there is no Boys option where boys can benefit from more focused learning for them.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:46 PM
2

If I make a class titled "Boys Coding", what do you think the feeling a little girl is going to get when she goes "Is there a Girls Coding class?" Surprise! There's no "Boys Coding" class, the situation is reversed. The reason you don't understand this as a problem is because you fail to treat boys as individuals who can also experience isolation and sadness as a result of exclusion. Not to mention the fact that many boys would also enjoy a coding course - especially given tax payers pay for the…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:44 PM
1

I'd have nothing against girls only clubs, the problem is that feminists hate, attack, invade and dismantle male clubs at every point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B9QKDbvRXI
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:41 PM
1

If you setup a Girls Coding Class you must setup a Boys Coding Class. I'd love for one of you sexist fools to explain how Genitalia matters in programming. As a soon to be CS grad I've never once thought "Gee, Computer Science sure depends on my dick a lot more than I thought it would" yet you morons sure think genitalia of certain varieties are needed.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:38 PM
1

So what? It's called Sexual Dimorphism, the same can be said for Male nurses, seriously grow up and get over it. If you think women are so incredibly weak that they can't handle a majority male class then you are very misogynist.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:36 PM
1

Hey you insufferable halfwit I guarantee you that a class called "Coding for boys" would be co-opted within about 30 seconds by the man-hating feminists. Case in point, Feminists are co-opting the Boy Scouts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B9QKDbvRXI It is never OK to tell a little boy "You can't learn to code, because you're a boy". If you can't reverse the genders and come to the same conclusion then you're a sexist.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:34 PM
1

To feminists its all about getting ahead, if you treat people fairly it's much harder to get ahead of them.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:31 PM
1

Feminists: "But how do we exclude boys?" Feminism is about man-hating, that's literally all there is to it.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:31 PM
1

No it has sexist intentions. There is no reason to have more women in Computer Science, there is plenty of reason to have more people who are interested in Computer Science in Computer Science. Saying to a young boy "You're interested in Computer Science but you're not allowed to take this course because you're a boy" is sexist and bigoted. You need to stop being a sexist ass and reflect, treat people fairly regardless of sex you awful human being.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:29 PM
1

I laughed.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/17 06:27 PM
13

Maybe people should focus on not being scumbags instead? Try living a life you don't have to apologize for.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/17 05:13 AM
2

Send her away, it's what she said she would do. Is she not a woman of her word? Is it not kind of him to offer to facilitate this change?
/r/MensRights12/11/16 08:01 AM
2

Mirror?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 11:44 PM
1

Indeed should've been a murder charge with life in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 11:07 PM
1

What's the maximum sentence?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 11:05 PM
1

May she rot in prison and then in hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 10:54 PM
1

Maybe try to give a damn about other people. You know the boys getting burned alive? Those are people too.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 12:28 AM
7

You CAN act to prevent further dead people. Ya know, maybe next time we don't let them get burned alive? Maybe we start treating Boko Haram like a real threat?
/r/MensRights23/10/16 06:57 AM
2

In order for that to happen we have to treat everyone equally, paying attention to the boys makes the problem even more severe and worthy of attention. (Literally MORE victims, who were even more egregiously treated). Getting people to donate, take action, and call for political response seems to be harder than it used to be. Everyone wants to sign the virtual petition or tweet and no one wants to call a senator.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 06:56 AM
7

They got national attention, including from the president. It may not be as simple as willing people to safety but at least bring notice to the problem. The UN has also been attempting to work with the Nigerians: https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/bring-back-our-girls-now/ Seriously, you're a heartless fuck. Your head is so far up your ass that you can't care about others.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:57 AM
5

No, I want BOYS who were BURNED ALIVE to be given attention, national outcry, and calls for aid. I expect young boys (i.e. Those burned alive in this case) to be given sympathy and care. Seriously, you're a monster.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:50 AM
1

You're a piece of crap, boys were BURNED ALIVE and still couldn't get included in even a fucking hashtag. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:42 AM
8

How would you say it compares to the likes of #BringBackOurGirls? http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-did-kidnapping-girls-but-not-burning-boys-alive-wake-media-up-to-boko-haram/ I'm sure they'll get a presidential speech, and massive media outcry too? Right.....?
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:31 AM
6

http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-did-kidnapping-girls-but-not-burning-boys-alive-wake-media-up-to-boko-haram/ Boys get nothing girls get massive attention. Go Fuck Yourself.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:29 AM
6

Let's compare this to saaaaaaaaaay, #BringBackOurGirls. Which would YOU say got more attention. By the way, the media ignored the countless boys burned alive or hacked up with machetes by Boko Haram: http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-did-kidnapping-girls-but-not-burning-boys-alive-wake-media-up-to-boko-haram/
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:29 AM
2

She deserves no such thing.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 11:43 PM
1

Would be nice if they left a comment, maybe a nice civil discussion on why it's so unpopular. Not sure what they hope to accomplish by just downvoting and walking away.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 11:48 PM
1

Women are the majority of voters, women CHOOSE men to be in that position.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:39 PM
1

I'm not sure why you're getting downvotes, but uh have an upvote to balance it out I guess?
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:33 PM
2

Yay! Flood the criminal justice system with countless accusations with no possibility of evidence being provided!
/r/MensRights10/09/16 10:29 PM
6

Clarity always helps. She lied - which was wrong - and lying about rape is an occurrence often ignored by the mainstream media. That's the extent of the MRM involvement on this I think. False accusations need to have a punishment, pointing out this person as an example of a false accusation doesn't make him "an example of MRAs".
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:52 PM
1

Trump is leaps and bounds better than Hillary Clinton. You're damn fucking right I'll be voting trump.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:52 PM
1

One of the things I disagree with him on.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:50 PM
1

They already live longer, what the fuck do they want?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:42 PM
2

Everything is harder when you're inept.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:33 PM
2

Nah, she's a damned hateful human being. I won't excuse repeated hailing of all marriage as an institution of rape, calling to put men in camps, and declaring war on heterosexual relationships just because she goes "Lulz, only joking". He actions align more with her words if they are serious.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:28 PM
1

It varies from person to person, some people can even get pregnant during their period. Sex is a reproducing act, if you're going to use it for recreation then take one of the 12+ methods of birth control or act like a grown adult with self-control.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:34 PM
1

That man loses his life, is your life not worth anything to you?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 08:56 AM
1

Let's think of this way. You're a straight man, you like women. You tell everyone "I'm gay" what the FUCK other than your words would lead someone to conclude that? It's provable: I.E. You either DO or DO NOT fuck people of the same sex. And I can tell you don't trust the mental health community so you probably don't know this. In order to get a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, in this instance in order to get prescription medicine in order to transition, you have to meet certain criteria. There a…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 03:37 PM
1

That's odd, I didn't realize gender couldn't be identified. That's why Gender Identity is a thing I guess. Because we can't identify it. Also, who gives a shit about reproducing? If a woman has her ovaries removed due to cancer and can no longer have kids, she's still a woman (obviously not talking about trans people here before you say anything). I'm a man, I have balls a dick and a Y chromsome, I say "I'm a woman" what the FUCK other than my own words could lead someone to conclude that?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 03:20 PM
1

And when confronted with the fact that you're wrong about my chromosomes you think I'm lying Because of how rare it is. It's one of two things either you're wrong (i.e. You were XX and were never a man) or you're lying (and you don't have XX chromosomes). Gender and Sex aren't the same thing. Gender is what you think you are, Sex is what you really are. Gender means nothing, gender won't let you reproduce, sex will. Gender doesn't carry on humanity, sex does. Gender can't be identified, Sex can.…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:42 PM
1

Every single link you cited agreed with me, the medical dictionary agrees with me, the very DEFINITION of Sex Determining Region Y agrees with me. You have no evidence.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:29 PM
1

This is honestly why I avoid this sub. Its just full of bigots who want rights but won't accept anyone else. What right have I deprived you of? You have every freedom everyone else has. I wouldn't ask for you to be hurt or left behind and I certainly think you should have the same rights everyone else has under the law. I disagree with what you believe yourself to be because it conflicts with scientific fact, that is all.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:17 PM
1

Can you show me a bioligist's paper that agrees with you? They say that trans people are deluded and that they're right? You think you ARE something that you are provably not. Biological sex is it's own TERM, the SRY Gene was found named and described by biologists. The point was to show you that XY and XX are not the only options that can exist in people and that if genetic anomalies like these can exist then why can't it exist in the brain as well? If they exist in the DNA they are genetic dis…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:12 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klinefelter_syndrome that result from two or more X chromosomes in males Y chromosome => Male. One who suffers from a genetic disorder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XYY_syndrome XYY syndrome is a genetic condition in which a human male has an extra male (Y) chromosome, Some medical geneticists question whether the term "syndrome" is appropriate for this condition[1] because its clinical phenotype is normal Y chromosome => Fully functioning male, can't even tell the…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:56 PM
1

Define a man then. And define a woman. Y Chromosome - Man. No Y Chromosome - Woman. Also the first part is pretty shitty thing to say. Fake horn, fake vagina, fake penis. All are fake, equally so. I don't know how you can say that you want help from the psychiatry community and then go on to say that their studies and methods about a group of people are just flat out wrong. It most certainly is a mental illness, that's not up for question. The fact of the matter is you have two things: Body and …
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:43 PM
1

If I staple a horn to my face am I a unicorn? If a man loses his penis does he cease to be a man? It's not genitalia that matters. You said "You were a man" I reasoned you meant you are XY but choose to claim you are a woman. If you were XX then you were, in fact, a woman. I doubt this INCREDIBLY rare issue is the case however. Reading this part: Symptoms usually include small testes and subjects are invariably sterile. I.E. Completely and utterly unable to fulfill the male reproductive aspect s…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:34 PM
2

I haven't harassed any men actually, but thanks for the input. You came to dismantle the infographic (low quality as it may be) completely missing the point: Men aren't privileged, they need help same as anyone else. I actually talked about how things will likely be getting better for men over the next few years because of the awareness from groups like yours. "Thanks for raising awareness, let me explain how none of these things matter! Men dying, #7 cause of death? Well, women attempt more! So…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:25 PM
1

We can't talk when you won't listen. Men have issues, they want them addressed. You simultaneously complain about Men not coming forward and harass them when they do. When men say "We're not getting fair custody" you cite an an sourced claim saying abusers always win. You have no intention of helping men, despite the fact that you are one yourself.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:10 PM
2

And we can literally only help people if they themselves want help. As to why there aren't very many men's centers, there are less male victims and men are much less likely to actually step forward and ask for help with whatever issue they're having Men are ASKING FOR HELP, they're asking for equal parenting, they're asking for DV shelters, they're asking for aid. Feminists come in and tell us men are "privileged" that is the ONLY point of the infographic, not to imply that women aren't sufferin…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:01 PM
2

The fact is, those 15 women were trying to die just as much as the 5 men who did end up committing suicide Prove it. They intentionally choose a non-lethal method, despite knowing how unsuccessful it is. As for how many times an unsuccessful attempt is recounted, each attempt is one attempt. Wrong, that's not how statistics work and that's not how the CDC gathers it's statistics. This would require a massive national database to track each and every person who has ever committed suicide (in orde…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 12:18 PM
3

I love it when someone comes along and blows my posts out of the water with an incredibly articulated response. All I want is for fathers to be able to see their children regardless of their financial ability to fight for them or their willingness to fight an uphill battle in a knock down drag out fight in the family court system. A default shared parenting spares everyone a lot of grief including the children.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:35 AM
1

So long as women give something equivalent and beneficial as the men do I have no issue.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:31 AM
4

Dude that's literally the feminist movement. The feminist movement of the past which wanted women in the workforce not the modern feminist movement which wants preferential quotas for jobs in desirable/easy fields. We always hear about STEM, why not sewer workers, petroleum engineering, deep sea fishing?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 09:50 AM
1

So perhaps some of the money could go to better mental health services and programs for men and boys? Especially since the possibility of being drafted may cause anxiety and feelings of sadness, and also, I do think that boys and men are overlooked in the mental health sphere. I would agree with this. Though I would have to say I think this still falls under the category of encouraging economic prosperity. Healthier happier people leading to less crime, more productive workers, a larger workforc…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 09:48 AM
34

Ah yes, Hillary Clinton can go fuck herself.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 09:44 AM
1

I think that the money should be put to use to make it so that men who are drafted are less likely to get killed All of the initial funds should of course go to whatever necessary and worthwhile safety measures can be taken. The problem there is it eventually becomes not worthwhile. $150,000,000 for a marginal increase in safety that won't be noticeable? Or programs back home that help society greatly by ensuring other men\boys are more productive? (I.E. the loss of male life becomes less severe…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:56 AM
5

Where is it said that men should no be helped?! You said and I quote: The homicides statistic is also laughable You think men being murdered is funny? That's pretty fucked up. Only mentioned that it is multifactorial and for the vast majority contained within one gender. Which do you believe gets more media attention: Homicide (Primarily affecting men) or Rape (Primarily affecting women)? Do you think that if Rape was primarily women raping women (Women raping men\boys is already ignored)that it…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:38 AM
1

I don't really see the reason why people who have made it through their eligibility window, without being drafted, should go without the tax? I see the tax as simply a sign of gratitude for not being eligible for the draft, and helping out the people who are drafted, & since the military very well could've made the window longer so that 50 year olds were eligible for the draft, there's still some gratitude to be paid for no longer having the possibility of being drafted. That draft is fair and e…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:31 AM
1

I'd consider that a perfectly amicable solution so long as: A) The taxes are sufficient. B) The elderly who already served (or successfully made it through their eligibility window) are not hit again (After all everyone has the same age window). I see no reason to tax the disabled as they quite literally have no choice in the matter (Couldn't fight if they wanted to). You could also of course, waive the tax for anyone who served willingly for those women who are willing. (i.e. Sign up for the dr…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:09 AM
1

What should elderly people, particularly those who arrived in the US when they were older than draft age, have to lose in exchange for not being eligible for the draft? Those who come late do not get the same benefits throughout life, there is a lot to be said regarding whether or not immigrants should be able to move in and instantly start robbing our welfare systems, but that is a different discussion. Should they not be able to vote? They lose all the potential to have benefited from this cou…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:59 AM
1

The fact that old men make up the majority of hunters proved you wrong. Doesn't matter every single Elder either: A) Came to america late (And missed a potential lifetime of benefits) B) Lived in america their entire lives (And were eligible for the draft in the same window as every other american). Every American faces the same draft window. Hunting can still be dangerous. Nowhere near as dangerous as war. You're probably by far the most pathetic, weak willed, disgusting woman I've ever spoken …
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:49 AM
1

Most old people can walk, run, and carry guns. Every American has the same age requirements, seriously you couldn't be more desperate. What next draft newborns? Older men have fought against ageism for decades. Many of those older men have fought in WWII & Vietnam. Every american has the SAME AGE RESTRICTIONS ON THE DRAFT. Then why not draft the elderly? They have paid their dues. Every american has an EQUAL window of draft eligibility. Most women don't qualify either. "If you become stronger, y…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:45 AM
1

Please cite the number of Enemy Deer wielding AK-47s For some reason Hunting is a lot easier than warfare, can you guess why?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:38 AM
10

Better infographic: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O Large numbers, readable, easily readable links (with page/table numbers). It's a couple months old but the original page is here if you want to add constructive criticism: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ I'll be distributing them around my campus when the fall semester starts.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:36 AM
2

Male Privilege is meant sarcastically. In my infographic (Note how it is both readable and has specific sources cited per chart and shows table/page numbers) I put it in quotes to emphasize just that. https://imgur.com/WWozf7O
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:35 AM
3

See also the fact that men are a minority in undergrad enrollment: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O (Women continue to receive affirmative action).
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:34 AM
2

"No don't worry! We don't need to help men, they're only killing themselves!" We should still help the men affected and work to prevent the issue (80% of suicides may be sign of a bigger issue not to mention being a majority of the homeless). I have a better infographic here: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:33 AM
5

But it was something like 80%+ of custody cases are settled out of court with a vast majority being figured out before mediation even begins where both parents sit down and agree to terms for whatever reasons work for their personal lives. How many of those men didn't fight because they knew they couldn't beat the bias against them? A default shared parenting law is necessary. It also brought up the point that in most instances men don't seek custody in the first place which may be indicative of…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:31 AM
2

Here's a better infographic: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O I'd argue homelessness, suicide, and undergrad enrollment are all very serious signs of a lack of empathy towards men.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:27 AM
2

So are you asking that more women get killed ? Maybe the point is that, men do a lot dangerous work? Maybe the question is "Why are women's groups advocating women to work in cushy office jobs and not in sewers"? Men suicide more ? That's true. But are you accusing women of that ? Maybe, just maybe we can have a White House council on Men and Boys? You know, like the one we have repeatedly asked for? http://whitehouseboysmen.org/ http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2014/02/03/exposed-…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:26 AM
15

The primary victim of a man's death is the man himself.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:20 AM
4

"The overall weighted response rate for the 2010 NISVS ranged from 27.5% to 33.6%" See page 6: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-response_bias [1] Attempted Rape is incredibly low for students and non-students in the most vulnerable age group. "For the period 1995–2013, females ages 18 to 24 not enrolled in a post-secondary school were 1.2 times more likely to experience rape and sexual assault victimization (7.6 per 1,000)…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:19 AM
6

Where are your citations? That does not take into account the attempted suicide rate where women have a MUCH MUCH higher rate of attempted suicide. So a man dying counts as much as a woman who tried unsuccessfully? How many times is an unsuccessful attempt recounted? This is due to the methods that men and women typically choose. Men usually use a gun and women usually use pills. Do you think say, women are FAR MORE LIKELY to make a call for help? Do you think men see a system stacked against th…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:17 AM
3

Here's some more: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O I went to the extra distance to make specific citations e.g. Page and table.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:13 AM
1

A good question. I imagine they're very similar. Could you link me to a list of the jobs feminists are currently pushing women into and attempting to mandate quotas for? I'm curious as to which jobs are on the list :) I imagine sewage workers are predominantly male. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:12 AM
2

Here's a better one: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O Suicide, homelessness, undergrad enrollment, etc. At what point do men get help?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:11 AM
1

Here's a better one (made by me) https://imgur.com/WWozf7O
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:10 AM
3

Please cite the feminist movement trying to get women into dangerous and dirty jobs. Can't find one can you?
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:09 AM
4

Better version: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:09 AM
1

Everyone? Does that include old people? Are you saying women are as decrepit as the elderly? If you insist each demographic be drafted in proportion to their percent of the population, then should old people have to be drafted in proportion to their percentage of their population, even if they don't meet standards? Old people cannot run, walk, or carry a gun. Women can do all these things. In a draft any able bodied person should fight the elderly, sick, and disabled clearly don't qualify. Old p…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:03 AM
2

Wow, two editorial pieces! Guess, that means men love war. Hold on let me pen a piece on how women love to manipulate....what? You won't assume an anecdotal story as evidence supporting a claim about an entire group? Weird...you did it here.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:37 AM
1

Most women don't meet combat standards, so if you want to draft women to make up 50% of combat draftees, then you want women to be placed into combat even if they don't meet the standards. Draft is a last ditch effort. It's ironic, because you probably don't agree with affirmative action, do you? I don't think you agree with forcible equal 50/50 split in other roles/jobs in society, regardless of competence, do you? Every citizen is responsible for protecting the country. Saying "You don't have …
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:35 AM
1

1) Not everything is treatable. 2) Treating a soldier with incredibly expensive treatments results in more dead soldiers. Save one life with $1,000,000 or 500 lives with 2,000? You reek of being the incredibly naive "BUT BUT WE GOTTA SAVE EVERYONE!!"
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:33 AM
1

If a woman expects chivalrous behavior she best act as a lady who expects such behavior. Respect is earned not deserved.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:39 AM
1

And what about the ones who didn't die? What about all the ones working in steel mill before the war? It's a horse shit reward to pander to women.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:37 AM
7

Posted to r/Feminism The only safe way to do this is to agree with everything they say and call yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:29 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:52 PM
1

It's an all volunteer force boss, no one is required to be in the infantry/front lines. You choose it, sign the dotted line. You volunteered for it. No, it is not. When worse comes to worse you will fight.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:44 PM
1

Dying too and dying equally are not the same. Equal rights, Equal Fights. Cmon son. Just admit you don't know. Know more than you do ya damn fool.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:43 PM
1

You seem to think the draft is some kind of organized hug box.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:08 AM
1

We're not talking regular combat of a standing army. We're talking a draft i.e. The last hope before the nation falls. There is no "Conversing with foreign civilians" it's boots on the ground and blood in the water.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:08 AM
3

The female units will not be as mobile, and thus less effective as male units when it comes to combat. So send more of them. If you cannot send in an elite squad you send in more of the less elite, that is how it works. This is why I suggested That they work safe, comfy day jobs while men die. No.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:37 AM
2

There are psychological and psychological differences that make them generally less capable in that environment than men Not my problem. I don't want to risk the lives of men already in place Sex separated units.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:10 AM
5

Every single war since 1920. Women voted and controlled the outcome of political elections. Unless women lose the vote they must fight.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:15 PM
3

You know who VOTES for those politicians? The VOTERS. Most VOTERS are women.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:14 PM
5

I think they should be required to serve equally in combat.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:14 PM
1

Again, it's not an equal draft, because being drafted would have a much more negative impact on a woman than a man Don't care. Not every man is equally strong. We're all forced to die. If you die it's your fault, not mine. Are you going to answer the rest of my arguments? You're a woman who: Believes women deserve adoration and protection because they have a cunt. Believes Men are obligated to die for women because statistically men are stronger. Does not believe the law should FORCE women to us…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:20 PM
1

You ARE A WOMAN! OF COURSE YOU'RE HAPPY! You get unearned respect, adoration and protection! You're fucking priceless.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:13 PM
1

Oh god, I fucking love it. You ask for the pussy pass because you have one, then decree "Men should protect women!" I'm dying over here! A woman who thinks men owe her anything!
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:10 PM
1

I'm both a woman, as well as someone who would be considered disabled by the military, & thus wouldn't be allowed in the military, even if I volunteered. Of course you're a woman! No wonder you're so anti equal draft! You think YOUR LIFE matters more than MINE, "Men should protect women" HA. Go protect yourself, my life is mine. I owe you nothing, I will continue to protect children and continue to make sure that women are obligated to risk their lives for their country as men are.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:06 PM
1

Men and Women should BE EQUALLY LEGALLY OBLIGATED to use their biological gifts for their country (or die trying) Why? 81% of women already use their biological gifts in comparison to less than 1 of 5 men. It's not women's fault that most men aren't doing their duty. Both are currently meeting demand, the draft isn't active right now because it's not necessary, what if women are only reproducing at 1% when war breaks out? Anyway, can you answer MY question? Parents are obligated to children, wom…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 01:20 PM
1

Glad she was punished and not given a pass. Still seems an extraordinarily long sentence.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:23 PM
1

Oh, look who's deflecting :) We were talking about how Men and Women should BE EQUALLY LEGALLY OBLIGATED to use their biological gifts for their country (or die trying) remember? I've already taken this argument and dismantled it, focus on the chain we are in.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:51 PM
1

It's painful, it's optional, and I am no way legally obligated to do it, so it's exactly like birth in all of those regards. Oh, then again I don't bitch and moan about it as though it's forced on me as the end result (Fitness) is something I desire. If you think Birth is equivalent to the draft come speak to me when women are legally forced to sign up to give birth at the age of 18 and when they risk $200,000+ fines, imprisonment, etc. if they refuse. Don't forget to have them imprisoned for tr…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 02:07 PM
1

Eating or having sex does not cause a great deal of pain, suffering, bloodshed, and have a 9% chance of PTSD, like childbirth does. Sometimes people make choices with bad consequences. If you want to make big money on stocks and you drive yourself into crippling bankruptcy then that's on you, sure it's traumatizing but you CHOSE to do it. Working out is painful, so by that logic everyone who works out should be rewarded by reducing their responsibilities. After all I only want to be fit, I don't…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:58 AM
1

And again: If women MUST perpetuate the country (Via forced pregnancy and fines, jailtime, etc. if they refuse) then I'd see your claim but you think women should have NO OBLIGATION to perpetuate the country under the law and yet you think men MUST BE OBLIGATED under the law to throw their lives away. i.e. Women NO Responsibilities. Men ALL responsibilities. You are a sexist by literal definition. You think law should apply to Men but NOT Women.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:52 AM
1

Does eating cake contribute to the perpetuation of the country? Eating provides calories which keeps me alive so yes! However, giving birth contributes to the perpetuation of the country So does producing power, cleaning the water, and producing food - all jobs that are overwhelmingly male, meanwhile women continue to eat, drink, and consume electricity with no concern. If no women ever gave birth again, the nation would die within a generation. If men never had sex and gave women their sperm ev…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:48 AM
1

Most women DON'T want birth. They want children - sometimes - and birth is an agonizing prerequisite to that. Not "sometimes" but "Most times" :) So adopt. BAM Problem Solved. She could seek a surrogate mother as well :) Birth isn't forced, much like eating cake isn't forced. You can choose to do it and sure baking takes time and can be a lot of work but it's the work you CHOOSE TO DO (unless you're lazy and buy a cake or ask someone to make it for you). Women want to have DIED from childbirth? …
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:39 AM
1

Then so do women, and that's why men should protect women. Men ALSO deserve their right to life :) Children tend to be more carefully dealt with as legally they are the responsibility of the parent. (i.e. No one forces two people to keep adults in their home and feed them). Women have earned nothing and deserve nothing in exchange. Women give birth to the nation; men defend it. Men also participate in sex, they provide food and shelter. Men produce the water, energy, and trade of our society. As…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:15 AM
1

That's pretty much it.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:00 AM
1

Yet you had no problem with saying that women should be forced to protect/gestate a fetus inside of her body for 9 months (even in the case of rape). I said yes Murdering children is reprehensible even if under the pretense of rape. What does a WOMAN deserve in exchange for being forced to protect/gestate a fetus against her will? She isn't forced, don't have sex don't have kids, women have more than a dozen forms of birth control. How did the FETUS "earn" protection from the mother, who was a r…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:59 AM
1

Children can be victims. Fetuses, less so. Children are a stage of life. Fetuses are a stage of life. We disagree on this point (as we already discovered) so there's no point in arguing further but I just wanted to point out the inaccuracy in the original analogy.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:54 AM
1

But it's not equal to everybody else in the class. Yes, yes it is. If they break their leg they don't have to run. Studies show that mixed gender troops perform more poorly than male only troops. Never said mix the troops, but if you have two buckets it makes sense to draw from both. sending female only troops against male only troops is national suicide All troops risk their lives, if they are not as combat ready then send more to overwhelm with numbers. Women can't even compete against men in …
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:45 AM
1

When you don't wear a condom, you become pregnant, then have an abortion. An abortion is not an inevitability. One of these is a criminal act because it has victims. A child is also a victim.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:43 AM
1

I am pretty sure messing with contraceptives is already a punishable offense. Though from what I've gathered, it's not enforced on women. Messing with contraceptives does not equate to choosing not to take them. Much like Messing with someones speedometer does not equate to choosing to violate the speed limit. In the former case ONE is punishable by law, in the latter case BOTH are and that is why your analogy is invalid.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:30 AM
1

If you're willing to campaign for arrest of those not wearing condoms/participating in birth control then I will forgo the point, that is after all the equivalent penalty for not wearing your seat belt or following the speed limit.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:21 AM
2

We wear seatbelts for safety, we stay within the speed limit for safety, we stay in our lane for safety. Those are the LAWS, unless you are dictating condoms as LAW you have no ground to stand on. While your analogy works for bronze age societies, today we're exceptionally good at not getting pregnant, so good in fact, that getting pregnant from having sex is effectively a risk rather than a natural consequence. We're also exceptionally good at enforcing the law. Yes, the risk is natural in natu…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:19 AM
1

More like saying "You chose to drive a car, but you didn't choose to get in a car accident." Wrong. MOST drivers won't have a car accident (Requiring nothing to prevent, they don't have to get special addons for their car, use special awareness drugs, etc.) ALL SEX between healthy individuals will yield a birth UNLESS you purposefully act against it. Your analogy would only hold if driving into the wall was default.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:03 AM
1

but female There ya go. Any other questions you need answered?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:38 AM
2

One of my favorite posts "Everytime a shooting happens they always try to take the guns away from those who didn't do it"
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:36 AM
1

In this sexist situation what do the MEN deserve?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:33 AM
1

They choose to have sex. They aren't being forced to give birth, because abortions are available It's akin to saying "You bought a car, but you didn't CHOOSE to pay taxes". You know the consequences of your choice.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:31 AM
1

Every person on Earth did not utilize their fathers' bodies for gestation for nearly a year. Utilized their father's shelter, food, and safety for almost all of Human History.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:31 AM
1

Haven't heard anything, maybe try emailing the NCFM?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:30 AM
1

Women deserve nothing more than they earn, if they want adoration and protection they should be obligated to earn it. Get your self deprecating nonsense out of here.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:29 AM
1

Anyway, "equality" doesn't really exist. Would you expect a student with a broken leg to run the mile during gym class in order to get a passing grade, just like everybody else, because ~equality~ That same privilege would be allowed to EVERYONE who had a broken leg, so yes it is in fact equal. Anyway, the Center of Military Readiness itself has said that having women sign up for the draft isn't practical & would actually do more harm than good. Not when it results in significantly less men bein…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:28 AM
1

I agree its a case by case basis but I think that this crime warrants more than 6 months in prison. I would agree if not for his victims plea for leniency, I'd probably have given a year myself but I'm not as privy to the case as the Judge is.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 08:12 PM
3

There is really something to be learned by this case. Indeed.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:53 PM
1

Abortion is a tricky issue for me. It's a rights balancing issue. Safety of the mother, Safety of the child, Future of the child (Is the child going to be brain dead? Do you keep it alive?), Capability of the parents (Should a woman who's guilty of murder\rape be allowed to make children, even when in prison?). My opinions change and get more nailed down over time, the whole thing is nebulous and there's a lot of Pros and Cons to think of.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:47 PM
2

This doesn't belong in /r/MensRights although I don't know where it would belong as even /r/MensRants seems out of place. Maybe /r/MensShitposting?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:40 PM
1

U.S. Justice System is broken, the consensus on which crimes fit which punishments is so wildly different. I've seen people asking for life in prison for the Brock Turner case.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:35 PM
3

He'll already spend the rest of his life on the Sex Offender Registry. In some cases the rapist\Sex Offender doesn't even get their name released much less time in prison: http://www.abc17news.com/news/woman-pleads-guilty-to-child-sex-crimes-in-jefferson-city/38062948 I think punishment should vary case by case, it's not "Murder == Life in prison". The end goal should be some form of punishment + some form of rehabilitation. We live in a very prison happy nation for some reason.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:34 PM
1

It's very hard to argue that, when people do not think that an unborn child is alive :| Even harder when feminists are fighting for abortions at any point during pregnancy.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:30 PM
1

I'll admit my own beliefs are very callous here, due to a number of factors. Mine are a bit more emotionally driven, I'm legally blind due to alcohol consumption during pregnancy (Yes, I'm a FAS baby) so I feel women have more responsibility to their child during pregnancy than society currently applies to them.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:02 PM
1

Even though his sentence is terribly lenient at least he is serving a sentence. Always curious when I hear this. I have two questions in response: What are you basing this off of? What would you have given them?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:54 PM
2

Nope, if you intentionally injure yourself as a means to getting out of the draft. You will be criminally prosecuted. They'll keep you in by any means necessary, the message is clear: If you're a man your life belongs to the state.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:53 PM
1

I think that if you don't take steps to disengage yourself within reasonable time, you should have the responsibility, yes. What is a reasonable time to you? I don't consider fetus murder to be murder, I think that's our third hurdle. A human comes in different stages. A child is simply a collection of cells growing into an adult, it grows taller undergoes puberty, becomes sexually capable, becomes more intelligent. A fetus is simply a collection of cells growing into a child, it grows organs (h…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:52 PM
2

Right, there's no easy out for men from the draft. I guess you could try shooting your leg off. Abortion != Draft. Edit: It's actually pretty interesting because the reasons people dislike abortion (Concern for the life of a child) and the reasons people don't want women in the draft (Concern for the lives of women) shows you the clear hierarchy of value society has.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:43 PM
1

Okay, I think we have some differences in individual rights as well, but these are all very touchy-feely value judgements. I could concede that, a lot of my argument is emotional concern over children. You are coming from concern about individuals (seemingly those who come into a situation unwittingly such as rape) which I can understand. You seem to have rather internally consistent views I try to be consistent, and I do have reasoning for the things I say. The reason I think the formation of t…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:31 PM
1

One of those responsibilities may be to abort, or deal with an STD, but no being punished. And if you DON'T abort and abortion is legal, then you must absolutely be financially responsible right? You mean that red mess in the medical container? So if it isn't pretty murder is okay. So if we find for example someone hurt disability and mutilated shockingly it's okay to kill them?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:25 PM
2

Still don't like it (Would rather the artificial womb thing) but it's at least much less terrible. Edit: It should still be done in a humane way. None of this just rip it out with a vacuum nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:22 PM
3

I didn't cite that specific incident, I imagine she'll do some campaigning in this regard. The words of the president themselves carry weight.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:21 PM
1

Should it be punishable with 18 years of responsibilities? Absolutely. Government should provide rehabilitation and assistance in the form of parental training, WIC, etc. Which they do. Is it wrong to create life? Is it wrong to abandon a life you create? To say "Sure, you'd never exist if it wasn't for me but I just don't care if you're fed or warm or happy in any way"? Or is it just criminally negligent to admit you can't handle the responsibilities attached with taking care of another person?…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:51 PM
1

"I think I may be pregnant, I want an abortion" FINE "You're pregnant" "I want an abortion" MURDER So, if it's in the opposing persons custody it's not okay. So if a Woman has custody of her child, or a Man has custody of his child he should be allowed to kill the child (or simply leave it outside of the shelter they're obligated to provide, depriving it of nutrition and safety). Okay, this is one of the cores of our disagreement. I'd like to focus on that. When do you think it is too late to te…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:49 PM
1

Unless within that arbitrary line where we say she hasn't officially taken on parental responsibilities yet. Oh right, you're not a parent until you fill out the paper work. She chose to have sex, people are responsible for the actions they undertake. you aren't by chance a christian? God doesn't exist and I won't believe that until I have proof to the contrary. Christianity is no more valid than Islam or Satanism or the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. You drink and drive? There are risk…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:41 PM
1

And that's an attitude we generally see as trying to oppress others reproductive rights. You're really big on the bandwagon fallacy aren't you? I don't subscribe to "We" I am "Me" and I think if you're going to create a child you should take care of it. You seem to forget that people have an autonomy that should be respected. So you should be able to get in a car drunk and kill someone, no don't throw them in prison because they don't want to be there! Value their autonomy! Yes, they made choice…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:36 PM
2

So as long as it's schrödingers baby, it's okay to flush it out? If it takes you weeks of waiting to find out if a baby, may possible actually be there yes. That's why we've decided some reasonable period where the responsibility becomes binding. Some people discover pregnancies late, some take a few weeks to realize they aren't cut out for parenthood. And clearly I believe in that to an extent (Morning after pill and all) but at what point is that "window" closed? Feminists seem to think there …
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:34 PM
1

The military isn't large. Larger than it needs to be. Only 1% of American men, IIRC, are in combat roles. Sufficient for the time, not mandatory currently because it's not wartime. 81% of women give birth. And if war breaks out, and 81% suddenly drops to 16% how do we grab those women and force them to make children for the state? Women shouldn't have to be forced to sign up for a childbirth draft just because not enough men are pulling their weight and doing their duty. So because the military …
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:27 PM
1

While individuals shouldn't be forced to take on parental responsibilities (including monetary) Those individuals are the ones who made the child, they ARE responsible. I definitively think that caring for the ones who can't care for themselves should be a responsibility of society. And caring for children you took part in creating should be a Parent's responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:23 PM
1

If it's you or the wolves, and you already have the responsibility, then you're taking care of it. So if a woman is already pregnant and she cannot find another method of caring for the child. She's taking care of it.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:22 PM
1

Nobody is forcing you to become a parent, but if you choose to Nobody is forcing women to have sex, but if they choose to, they need to care of the child until it is born. or you find someone else to take the responsibility. And if you can't find someone to take care of it you must take care of it yourself. Right?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:13 PM
1

Men opt into the MILITARY, Women opt into pregnancy for a child they can keep in raise. Men are FORCED to register for the draft, despite our large military (And are punished if they don't register). Women must be FORCED to register for insemination, despite our current birth rates (And should be punished in the exact same ways if they don't register). If you're arguing for biological sexism for the draft, then this absolutely must be equal to you. Both sexes are REQUIRED BY LAW to use their bio…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:07 PM
1

Now, if we had magic incubating machines that could do the whole pregnancy thing for us, I might argue we should use those and make the kids wardens of the state If you're willing to accept that (When artificial wombs come about, and they will) that the child MUST be allowed to live (With both parents obligated to pay child support), I'm content to live until then.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:05 PM
1

Unnecessary. 81% of women give birth. There are more than enough people. They can choose not to, they must be required UNDER LAW to do so during war time (And the government must control the raising of the child in order best ensure it's combat ready) and must sign up to do so at 18 or face $200,000 fines, loss of financial aid, and potentially arrest.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:58 PM
2

Explains the draft doesn't it.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:55 PM
1

So parents have no duties to their children whatsoever? If I have a child and go "Nah, I don't want you" I can just stop drop them outside and walk away?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:51 PM
1

In both cases: A woman makes a choice. A child is dead as direct consequence.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:48 PM
1

He have to pay child support if he was a victim of rape. Wow you're a fucking backwards thinker. Don't be surprised you're not the only one who thinks men don't matter: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ No. Child support is money given to support the children. The children the woman CHOSE to create, nobody FORCES them to use it on their children either. We're referring to giving money to the woman for their services of gestation. N…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:46 PM
1

It's not HIS life being put at risk. So if the woman chooses to say have a natural birth, it's okay that she's putting her life at risk further? Yes, in cases of rape, childbirth is a fight forced on women, at least the ones who are raped. So if a man is being forced to pay for a child that isn't his, and he didn't consent to his DNA being shared why shouldn't he be able to terminate that life? Why does a CRIMINAL have right to their body but a child doesn't? Men should pay women money, in retur…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:27 PM
1

And the woman can also CHOOSE to take an abortion. A woman can also choose to stab a baby to death.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:17 PM
1

"Just because it passes the magic stage of suddenly being a life for your sake it doesn't make it less right with an abortion than a morning after pill." So we should just kill anyone who isn't an adult right, after all only adults are independent.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:16 PM
2

And the woman can also CHOOSE to take an abortion. Just because it passes the magic stage of suddenly being a life for your sake it doesn't make it less right with an abortion than a morning after pill. Hell, with that pill, it already assumes life has begun. It is an abortion. It is ASSUMED not proven. Cutting the cord != killing Depriving a baby of food == Killing. Depriving a baby of oxygen == Killing. If a mother can say "Yeah I started taking care of a child, but now I'm kind of ehhhh about…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:15 PM
1

Wow, they even both gave them Marijuana after words. Very similar cases. Edit: Well apart from the fact in this case he is in prison and perpetuated a crime against a single person.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:58 PM
2

Now, men and women can vote Fair. Men and women have parental rights as well. Fair. That means they have a COST, should they ever become pregnant, that they have to risk their lives to deliver Ah, men commit suicide, and because they do so therefore they deserve another right. http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2013/index.htm This is the problem with your argument it depends on someone CHOOSING to do something. The women can CHOOSE not to have sex, or CHOOSE to take birth control, or CHOOSE to take the…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:57 PM
1

Why do YOU want WOMEN to die so badly? I want them to fulfill the same roles and responsibilities that men are obligated to by the federal government under the law. They may very well not die, many men die, and that is sad. I simply expect equality. I wouldn't throw a temper tantrum if women did very well and returned alive. Increasing female deaths won't decrease male deaths. It'll just make it so that those male deaths are more likely to have been in vain. Your logic is "If we have two buckets…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:51 PM
1

Here's the lovely link you gave stating: Men should be willing to die for women. http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2012-07-why-men-should-be-willing-to-die-for-women I'm one of the MRAs that think the lives of Men belong to themselves.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:36 PM
1

Why do want men and children dead so badly?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:34 PM
1

You think women should die in childbirth and receive nothing in exchange. If I jump out in front of a car, I know I'm putting my life at risk. No one said "If you don't jump in front of the car you have to pay $200,000, we'll arrest you, you can't get government aid."
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:34 PM
1

You think women should die in childbirth and receive nothing in exchange. They choose to participate, they knew the risks. And don't say it's a choice because it's not. Yes, yes it is. Some women are raped, and you think they should be forced by the government to carry the pregnancy to term. It has nothing to do with women, everything to do with children. If a man is raped, should he have the right to kill the child? After all he did not consent to have the child. As for the parental rights thin…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:32 PM
1

Do you want the draft? In that case, who should be drafted? If the draft does exist - Both men and women equally including in combat. If the draft does not exist - A law stating that should it resurface it must be done equally between Men and Women including in combat. Do you want to allow abortions, in that case, who should be drafted? The government does not force women to have sex. The government does force men to sign up for the draft. Please direct me to the list of fines, prison time, and …
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:28 PM
1

By that logic, men shouldn't be able to have equal rights over their biological children, because they didn't have to endure the "equal fight" to get access to it (pregnancy and childbirth). We're not including men who JOIN THE MILITARY WILLINGLY, we're talking about men that are FORCED TO FIGHT TO THE DEATH AGAINST THEIR WILL.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:13 PM
1

By that logic, men shouldn't be able to have equal rights over their biological children, because they didn't have to endure the "equal fight" to get access to it (pregnancy and childbirth). Men are forced to fight by the government, women choose to have sex. Not the same and you know it. Your argument is this: If something dies slightly less easily (And is only male) you think they should be the only ones to die. In exchange they should get nothing for the responsibility they are obligated to f…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:12 PM
1

"Sending female-only combat units out against male-only combat units... That's literally national suicide" That's up to them, send them in larger groups to compensate. If you can't send a Spec OPS squad you don't send an equal number of regular soldiers, you send more. You truly don't care if we win the war, do you? We'll have literally twice as many people to deploy, all of the "Good soldiers" you care about will still exist and can be deployed in other locations while women fight else where. Y…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:08 PM
3

If we're going to allow women to butcher/birth babies at will then the father should at the very least have the right to financial abortion. Men should be able to say "I don't want this child, if you want it then you can have it, but I do not have to pay for it it is your responsibility"
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:03 PM
1

Higher injury rates means the military has to spend more money. & With each injury, combat unit efficiency is decreased. Limit the money, say "This is what men receive for their injuries, you're cut off"
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:59 PM
1

Women must serve equally in combat? Because to hell with combat effectiveness, right? And what do men deserve for having their lives stolen from them simply due to their sex?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:58 PM
2

They get the VOTE for free, you didn't mention it because it's the part that undermines your argument.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:57 PM
3

Women choose to have sex, the draft is not optional.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:57 PM
1

""All-male task forces outperformed mixed-gender units 69 percent of the time" So use sex separated task forces. "Injury rates among women were two to six times greater — even higher in load-bearing infantry task force teams."" So it's fine if ALL the deaths form the draft are men, but if women are getting hurt ohhh no! You ask what benefit men get for being the only ones to be drafted. The get Forced to fight for a country that routinely disrespects them They get shot, maimed, killed, all becau…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:55 PM
3

This woman got 5 months probation for rape, she also got to keep custody of her child: http://www.abc17news.com/news/woman-pleads-guilty-to-child-sex-crimes-in-jefferson-city/38062948 She had the added benefit of getting her name hidden from the papers.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:51 PM
2

There's this: http://www.abc17news.com/news/woman-pleads-guilty-to-child-sex-crimes-in-jefferson-city/38062948
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:50 PM
2

Let's compare: http://www.abc17news.com/news/woman-pleads-guilty-to-child-sex-crimes-in-jefferson-city/38062948 Originally sentenced was 35 years in jail, reduced to 5 months probation Her sentence was suspended AND she was placed on parole She was convicted of 5 counts: one charge of statutory rape, two of statutory sodomy and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child. She will be allowed to keep custody of her children. Her name was hidden from the press.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:29 PM
36

She'll FOR CERTAIN expand the kangaroo courts on campuses and reduce justice further.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:26 PM
3

Justice actually happens sometimes wow.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:25 PM
1

Consider this: 150 000 000 to draft from or 300 000 000 to draft from. I'm doubling our numbers, not only do we get to have all the same people did before but we can even more.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:21 PM
2

Glad we're in agreement then.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:24 PM
1

Now, what I'm saying is, that nobody should be charged for their rights to post. Especially when it's your life you must pay with. The second war breaks out the draft would re-appear so fast your head would spin. Getting rid of the draft is fine on one condition: We pass a law stating that should it get reinstated women must enlist, and women must serve equally in combat.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:36 PM
1

Now, what I'm saying is, that nobody should be charged for their rights to post. Especially when it's your life you must pay with. The second war breaks out the draft would re-appear so fast your head would spin.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:35 PM
1

Now, what I'm saying is, that nobody should be charged for their rights to post. Especially when it's your life you must pay with. The second war breaks out the draft would re-appear so fast your head would spin.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:35 PM
2

Let me posit it this way: I demand you pay me $5 for your right to post on reddit. I also demand that as a man you pay me $10 for the ability to post in /r/MensRights. As a woman I also pay $10 to post in /r/TwoXChromosomes but I do not have to pay the $5 to post on reddit. If you do not pay your dues, forced on you due to your sex, you are obligated to: Pay additional fines upwards of $200,000. Be arrested. Would you accept my deal? Edit: Keep in mind in the actual situation it's not $5 BUT YOU…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:10 PM
1

Men choose to freely practice their rights, and vote. In return they may be drafted. Vote == Draft. 1 right. 1 responsibility. Draft is imposed by the government, prison, fines, and threats of execution face those unwilling to obey. Women choose to freely practice their rights, and have sex. In return, they may have to give birth And what do women pay for their right to vote? Oh right, nothing. 2 Rights -> 1 Cost Women will not be forced to have children they can take birth control (of over a DO…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:08 PM
1

I didn't say there wasn't racism, but it's not part of a system. The issues black people face are largely issues that were never fixed, stemming largely from poverty. Another prime issue is the loss of black fathers. Men have legitimate issues, Men are not oppressed. Black people have legitimate issues, Black people are not oppressed. Oppression dynamics are for the mentally weak. You can even make people just look at photos of people who are black or white and record a difference. Yes, and you'…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:15 PM
7

Oh silly, Men don't matter to Feminists!
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:53 PM
7

I hope so.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:49 PM
0

Because they're not oppressed, or rather they use their oppression narrative from the past in order to excuse hate and bad behavior in the present.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:49 PM
1

Oh hey based guy.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:40 PM
0

There's also another very clear line, called "STATUTORY RAPE" which should be applied to both genders fairly.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:38 PM
4

Or this woman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-nuGnmAfBE
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:37 PM
17

Have you ever tried uninstalling McAffee? The fears are real.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:30 PM
29

I'd like to bring this into the discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-nuGnmAfBE
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:29 PM
3

This needs to reach the front page. All the people screeching over "6 MONTHS!!" for a first time sexual offender will love the 1 year this woman got from stabbing a baby repeatedly, after of course killing her previous baby due to drug usage.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:26 PM
1

BTW the author of the role reboot page you believe so heavily in is a fucking self-admitted sociopath. Just something to consider.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:20 PM
1

I never said that men should have to die in war. You said men should die for women and linked me to that article.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:18 PM
2

Because if you're against it, you're implicitly for people dying against their will during childbirth Terminating a pregnancy in order to save a life, is not the same as terminating a pregnancy in order to serve the mother's preference. Abortion in regards to death of the mother or potential health concern for the child is a whole different issue. Which is kind of a double standard. Not even remotely. Women choose to participate in Sex and child birth. Men do not choose to participate in the Dra…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:17 PM
2

Men should have no right to control women's bodies any further. Men don't control women's bodies, they protect the bodies of children. Men have provided food, shelter, clean water, power and risked their lives doing so for every human being in the modern world, they have every right to deny women those services. That's a fair argument right? It is MEN who die doing the dangerous jobs that keep our country afloat, so why let women reap equal outcome from lesser input? Nearly all birth occurs due …
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:12 AM
2

Wow, that guy is mentally unstable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Schwyzer#Controversies http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/02/exile-in-gal-ville-how-a-male-feminist-alienated-his-supporters/252915/ Real question, why is he not being charged? Murder-suicide? That is not a OOPS situation.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:30 AM
1

Abortion is legal in America. I'm not for it myself, excepting cases where the mother's life is in imminent danger due to the risk of childbirth. That is what the basis was formed from. Due to modern medicine, the number of deaths during childbirth has become negligible. We have an entire field of medicine devoted to pregnancy, obstetrics. and another entire field of medicine devoted to women's health, gynecology. Said that myself.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:55 AM
1

Sums up the Black Lives Matter movement as well.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:51 AM
1

Anyways I'm through with you. I will never die for you or any other woman, my life is my own. It will be a cold day in hell when I throw my life away for a sex which disregards the value of my life.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:38 AM
1

Also here's the top comment from your backwards article: "Author completely ignores the fact that throughout history, far more men than women have died on the job. Jobs they worked because they were likely providing for a woman. Therefore, using the author's same logic, most of those men died for their women. And don't forget the work-related injuries that when serious enough can effectively end one's productivity, enjoyment of life, and ability to provide. I say this not as an MRA (what a silly…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:36 AM
1

You want gender roles? Get the fuck back in the kitchen and start making children. Otherwise shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:35 AM
1

You can take your hate for men else where. Men owe women nothing, women can come back when they work as hard as the typical man and partake in equal responsibility. You're so fucking spineless and irresponsible you refuse to admit that women CHOOSE to partake in sex and child rearing. Next you'll complain about women eating cake, as though it's forced upon them. Dying during birth is not a virtue, it's an unfortunate circumstance, it's not something women ever DID for men, it was something that …
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:34 AM
1

But 81% of women give birth. Of their own volition. yes of course men should be the ones to do the fighting in war when worse comes to worse. http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2012-07-why-men-should-be-willing-to-die-for-women Go fuck yourself, I will not die for a woman. My life is equal." If a woman doesn't want the risk of child birth don't have sex, act like a grown fucking adult and acknowledge that you made your choice. I will not be forced to be drafted and die for wo…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:30 AM
1

At least men who died in war GET memorials. The women who died perpetuating the human race - what memorial do they get? They chose to have children, men cooperated with them, men all throughout history did backbreaking work providing for those children. Men died in "Women and Children first" policies. All 4 billion men in the world are alive because a woman gave birth to them. And Men made those women fertile, men plowed the fields, dug the wells, and built the quarries. A man has no right to be…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:49 AM
1

If you're next post is an idiotic false equivalency I'm done with you. The draft is forced by the government. Sex (and by extension birth) is not forced by the government. Men are not responsible for nature and both Men and Women should share the cost of protecting this country and it's freedoms.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:45 AM
1

Millions dead in war memorials. Doesn't matter to you, because "Women can't hurt men during birth".
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:41 AM
1

I fully understand. Men should die in war, Women should be able to kill men and children, abuse men during pregnancy, and Women should never ever ever have equal responsibility. Freedom isn't free, unless you're a woman apparently. You're a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:40 AM
1

You're a fucking retard. "Equal rights necessitate equal prerequisites" These are your words not mine, I said "Equal rights means Equal Responsibilities". You're a spineless coward who cannot tackle my words and so you inject your own. Birth is not a female responsibility enforced by the government, the government does not force women to engage in sex. You can't pick and choose. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't make up bullshit arguments and false equivalencies. In some culture…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:39 AM
1

Anyway, if equal rights necessitate equal prerequisites, then by that logic, men shouldn't get equal rights over their biological children (unless given permission from the mother) because they didn't have the equal prerequisite of carrying a pregnancy and giving birth. Oh look another false equivalency. The government doesn't force women do more of the gestation, that's nature. Can I call you Captain False Equivalency now? Equal rights either necessitate equal prerequisites or they don't. All o…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 11:21 PM
1

OR how about women & men both vote for men (and women) NOT to go out onto the battlefield? That way, men won't be getting shot at. And if women elect a president who leads to war? (Women are the majority of voters) http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf Men are the only ones who have to write the check, but women can incur the cost. Doesn't seem fair.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 09:25 PM
1

Forcing a woman to have an abortion is literally rape (it involves penetration against one's will), and while being a rapist is terrible, two wrongs don't make a right. However, he should not be required to pay child support. What if he had a disability and didn't want to share it with his offspring? He's now forced to bring a new life into the world that he didn't want to be responsible in creating. anyway...so you would agree that in order to get the equal right to vote, women should fulfill t…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 09:17 PM
1

Forcing a woman to have an abortion is literally rape (it involves penetration against one's will), and while being a rapist is terrible, two wrongs don't make a right. However, he should not be required to pay child support. What if he had a disability and didn't want to share it with his offspring? He's now forced to bring a new life into the world that he didn't want to be responsible in creating. anyway...so you would agree that in order to get the equal right to vote, women should fulfill t…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 09:17 PM
1

I'd rather have someone too stupid to hide their mistake than someone smart enough to subvert justice, yes.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:45 PM
0

You don't seem to understand. You don't seem to be willing to read. 14 years was the worst he could receive for his 3 felony charges of SEXUAL ASSAULT not rape. Please cite where I said 14 years was the worst he could receive for rape? 14 years is the maximum sentencing reserved for the most heinous of criminals. I find it unlikely you believe this is the worst case of sexual assault, and clearly the judge didn't believe it was. He did penetrate her with a "foreign object", his fingers. You are …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:01 PM
0

Even then it remains, Sexual Assault NOT Rape. 14 years is the maximum sentence, it is awarded to the WORST offenders. In no way was he the worst offender. He was a first time offender, it was fueled by alcohol and this provides uncertainty (Did he notice she was asleep? Was she consenting before hand? How long before the men showed up did she fall asleep? etc.), and he never penetrated her. He got 6 months in prison, 3 years of probation, and lifetime enrollment on the Sexual Offenders Registry…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 05:54 PM
-2

Of course not because in no way did he commit the maximum offense. No penile penetration took place, and the court couldn't confirm that she hadn't consented up until the point she lost consciousness. Both parties were very drunk and neither could provide completely verifiable information.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:33 PM
-3

There was no semen in the forensic analysis, no evidence of penile penetration. Is he a piece of shit? Yes. But this was an alcohol fueled situation, where the victim previously consented. He deserves prison time for sure but we don't just give maximum sentence to every single person who commits a crime.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:13 PM
5

Don't get married.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:12 PM
1

Seems to me that the only people whose lives matter at all to you are women. Men dying at war against their will? Who the fuck cares! Women Benefit! Children being ripped apart, vacuumed, deprived of nutrition! Who the fuck cares! Women benefit! You're a bigot and a monster.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:11 PM
1

A woman has more than a dozen forms of birth control, which must be provided by her insurance (At tax payers expense, which is mostly paid by men), and can simply abstain from sex. What about rape victims? Why wasn't she taking her FREE birth control? Why didn't she take the morning after pill which has a success rate of near 100%? If a man get's raped should he be able to kill the child or demand the child get's killed? Actually reproduction isn't the only purpose of sex. Otherwise there wouldn…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:10 PM
1

because so many women wear pants. Most men don't want to wear dresses, and it has nothing to do with being "Bullied". It's out of character for men, deal with it.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:05 PM
1

Fetuses deserve no more rights than born human beings. You mean like...THE RIGHT TO LIFE? Born human beings don't have the right to leach off of other people's physical bodies without that person's continuous consent Oh you mean they have no right to care, like say...WELFARE? We're talking about CHILDREN, and children most definitely have the right to care from their parents.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:02 PM
1

Anyway why do you think that abortion is murder? Take a child, rip their legs off, crush their head, and rip them to pieces. Sounds like murder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WiQNPk_2G8 "Born human beings don't have the right to leach off of other people's physical bodies without that person's continuous consent" Born children have a right to care, shelter, and nutrition provided by the parent and fetuses have the same right. It's not "Leeching" it's a child's right to parental care. I suppos…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 01:58 PM
1

What about infertile men? Infertile means that they're incapable of having children. What about castrated men who no longer have testicles? Sperm can be created from skin cells: http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-create-human-sperm-from-skin-cells Any man can potentially be a father, no woman is applicable to the draft. Even without this scientific advancement the overwhelming majority of men can have children, 0% of women are applicable for the draft. Anymore false equivalencies?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:29 PM
0

Trump is an idiot, Clinton is knowingly malicious. There is an obvious difference and I'd rather have the fool who can't keep their mouth shut than a bigot who acts discreetly.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:27 PM
1

But not all male voters are spouses of pregnant women All male voters have the potential to be fathers (Marriage is not necessary, spouse is the wrong word) and therefore all have a stake in keeping their children from being murdered by the mother. No women have a stake in the draft. So if they WERE shooting at those women, then women should be able to declare that nobody kill children? Yes, if women want to go out there and take the bullets instead. In short here's what we have from you so far:…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 05:24 PM
1

So men should be able to vote that women shouldn't be able to "murder" "children," right? Because it's a "human rights issue"? Those CHILDREN have half the DNA of the father so yes. Then why can't a woman vote that men shouldn't be able to go out & murder the actual living children in other countries? Because those children aren't shooting at those women. And Women DO indirectly cause war, they are the majority of voters and they vote for politicians.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:55 PM
0

Honestly, I just couldn't hear anything, it sounded like you were in an auditorium.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:35 PM
1

They also need to do away with the electoral college and have every vote count for ONE VOTE.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:31 PM
1

She will be exactly like the last asshole, and I think she is a pretty dismal option, but she isn't going to create instability, totally fuck up foreign policy, relations, trade or deeply injure the economy of the U.S either. Bullshit. Clinton is a known bigot, Trump is a panderer. They are not the same.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:30 PM
1

The video in no way makes him seem worse than Hillary Clinton. I am forced to choose the lesser of two evils, in this case it is Trump.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:28 PM
1

Indeed, I'm a US Resident myself but I like to follow Justice For Men and Boys (J4MB) https://j4mb.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:19 PM
6

I loathe feminism but if it it would stop with the bullshit oppression dynamics and trying to blame men for everything I would be willing to peacefully coexist. They would never do such a thing because, as you've seen, they get more outlandish and nonsensical over time.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 04:04 PM
1

Is it possible that the reason why transmen get bullied less is because it's far more socially acceptable for women to wear men's clothing!? It could be because it's 10,000 times more obvious. Women tend to wear jeans all the time, it's much more obvious that a norm is deviated from when men wear a dress. Don't insert your own spin and claim it as fact, you have no evidence for that claim.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:26 PM
1

I told you that women have consistently voted against war (and the draft) more than men have. And vote for politicians that lead to war. Which they should have no right to do. You said that regardless of whether they vote for or against it, they shouldn't be voting at all, unless they have the possibility of getting drafted. It's called Equal Responsibility yes. Then I said that if it's a matter of potential of having one's body directly affected, then men shouldn't be able to vote regarding abo…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:19 PM
1

Murder is murder is murder. Can't murder children. End of story. If the woman doesn't want a child keep her legs shut, take the free birth control, and use her 2nd amendment right to protect herself. Children are a burden yes, but you don't get to murder them just because of that. If not abortion, then what about birth control laws? Men pay the majority of taxes, if you want birth control to be a women's issue then you must make sure women are taxed heavier to compensate.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 05:47 PM
1

"The fact is that it's not men's bodies which are being directly affected by outlawed abortion. " It's not women's either, it's the body of a child. " It's not men who can be forced by the government to carry a pregnancy, instead of aborting, if they are raped and impregnated." Not the government's fault, it's the rapists fault. The government did not cause nor invoke it. The government simply said "You cannot murder a child".
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:34 PM
1

That's the most retarded non-argument I've ever heard. Does the person who beat them up get excused from the law? No.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:24 PM
2

Regardless, by your logic that women shouldn't have a say in warfare because they don't have to worry about being drafted A responsibility forced on men by the government. it shouldn't be men who are making laws that abortion should be outlawed Children matter to both genders, it's not a woman's right. It should be women making those laws. Murder is murder, murdering children isn't gender specific.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 04:36 PM
1

It would be fair to do so then, in all likelihood both would end up dead otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:23 PM
1

And I was in support of your post, I should have been more clear about that.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:17 PM
1

We live in a modern society with free speech, free religion, etc. there's no excuse to claim people are forcing roles on people. It's time for people to accept that no one is forcing them to do anything, they're forcing it on themselves because they don't want to disappoint others.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:17 PM
2

So you ARE saying that it's a woman's responsibility to gestate and bear a child if she's raped and impregnated. No, it's HER RIGHTS vs THE RIGHTS OF A CHILD. Much like MENS RIGHTS vS THE RIGHTS OF A CHILD, the adult loses out. Sorry Children > Adults in that regard.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:57 PM
1

So women get a pass on everything don't they. No responsibility, not even to children.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:16 PM
2

The government forces her to carry the pregnancy to term & give birth. The government also forces you to pay taxes on cars, are cars rape too? The government doesn't force you to own one. And you think that the average 12 year old even knows what that the morning after pill is, or is able to get access to it? Adults, police officers and medical officials do. What if the rapist holds her hostage for a week? Then she's pregnant & the government forces her to give birth. Yes, let's postulate about …
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:10 PM
2

If the government was FORCING women to engage in sex and have children. Women choose to have sex, men do not choose to get drafted. Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:04 PM
2

And men don't have to be forced to participate in giving birth if they get pregnant due to being raped. So they/you shouldn't have a say, since you have no obligation to fulfill the responsibility of giving birth if you're ever a rape victim who got pregnant. Men have no obligation to participate in making children, women have no obligation to participate in making children. BOTH have the obligation to take care of children. "And birth control isn't free, first off, but what if they're a 12 year…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 01:41 PM
1

I wouldn't allow a satanist to brand a child, and I won't allow jews to cut one. Freedom of Religion applies to the individual, not forcing it on others.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:55 PM
0

In no way does it harm men, creating female only platoons adds additional manpower and has zero effect on males in the military.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:44 PM
1

Doesn't matter, their lives don't matter more than the lives of men. The draft is a responsibility and it must be shared.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:42 PM
2

Women should be required to fight to. If you say "Oh don't worry you're a woman! You don't have to worry about dying, that's what men are for!" you've accomplished nothing more than changing the form of bigotry.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:40 PM
2

Women should have to fulfill equal combat roles.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:37 PM
2

You're very pro abortion, so why don't you propose they forcefully abort in cases of rape? Answer: You just care about women more than men.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:37 PM
2

Bingo.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:28 PM
2

Well women did try applying from time to time. Eh there were women who applied back in WW1. Western governments said no. Most women did not try applying, because most did not want to. You don't credit the actions of 0.01% of women to the whole group.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:28 PM
2

Women should be forced to register for the draft and partake in equal combat roles, it's time to stop saying "Men are stronger" just so women don't have to die.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:26 PM
2

If men have to die so do women, end of story. Equality, deal with it because it's going to happen.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:23 PM
2

I just realized the problem. You're a fucking cuck: "(which, in many cases, were used to subjugate women bc men wanted to control women reproductively)" https://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInAction/comments/4kgv3l/men_are_failed_mutated_abortions/d3f2qzt You think women were subjugated, while men died. Get the fuck over yourself and grow a pair.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:20 PM
1

Yeah but they are also voted for by men, who by your logic ("if they don't have to worry about being personally affected by it, so they shouldn't have the right to vote") shouldn't be voting. It's not that they wont be affected it's that they won't be forced to participate. It's a false equivelancy and you know it. "But it seems that you support men being able to vote "no, the government shouldn't allow women to throw their child's life away." So why can't women vote "no, the government shouldn'…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:18 PM
2

What if a woman gets raped & gets pregnant? And due to MALE legislators making laws that SHE was unable to have any say in, she's unable to get an abortion & is forced to give birth to her rapists baby against her will? Those MALE legislators are voted for primarily by WOMEN who are the majority of voters. What if a woman gets raped & gets pregnant? And due to MALE legislators making laws that SHE was unable to have any say in, she's unable to get an abortion & is forced to give birth to her rap…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 08:32 AM
1

And? Men can vote on matters of abortion & birth control without ever having to worry about it. Birth and abortion are not RESPONSIBILITIES. If a woman doesn't want to procreate she has no social responsibility. You cannot refuse the draft. Nice false equivalency though. "By the way, women consistently vote AGAINST war in higher numbers than men do. AND against the draft more than men do, despite not being a part of it." They should have no say in the matter, not that you provided any evidence w…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:22 PM
5

That's because there's a proven connection between being politically incorrect and having balls. Deadpool is just protecting his viewer base - Good business.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:07 PM
1

Separate units. Bam! Instantly not my problem.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 09:44 AM
4

Women's lack of upper body strength isn't my problem, I shouldn't have to die just because I'm stronger, especially when women have all the same Rights as I do and I get nothing in exchange.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:20 AM
1

In no way did I say "Draft more women than men" Organize the female units into larger groups. i.e. You can divide 200 / 5 = 40 or 200/ 4 = 50 Yes, you have fewer units, but they're larger.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:19 AM
4

Do terrible things never happen to Men on the battlefield? Torture is torture.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:11 AM
7

But they do, and they're 99.9999999999% male.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:11 AM
1

You're assuming those female units will have ZERO effect whatsoever. You're also assuming that those female units are used in the same way as male units and that those female units are in not reorganized to be more effective (i.e. Larger).
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:10 AM
1

You could also try a bit of practice at sites such as: http://www.procon.org/
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:09 AM
1

I wanna disprove it with facts to back me up but I get to scared and dont do it. Either too afraid to do it, or you aren't. Either you think the risks are worth it or you don't. Keep in mind that people will use these false statistics to continue to justify policies against men and boys, you shouldn't underestimate the significance of changing someone's mind. I would suppose a good way to reduce the fear would be to be as well versed as possible in Men's Issues. Know what you know Sure you know …
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:06 AM
1

If a woman gets drunk and masturbates is it self rape?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:04 PM
1

This just in "Pregnant women terrible swimmers" /s
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:03 PM
1

Does copying and pasting remove the fact that those videos show large numbers of feminists acting violent, bigoted and disrespect for others? The content doesn't change if it's been typed by hand, the video evidence remains.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:01 PM
5

I get a lack of conflict myself, I honestly understand. Throughout college I lived with multiple female roommates, and during a rash of home invasions. I was always the one sent downstairs to investigate noises, even though I'm legally blind. It occurred to me "Shouldn't the fully sighted people be doing this?" and yet at the same time I said "I don't know if I could handle something happening to her". I would not be against a male only draft, on the condition that those who are drafted are give…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:00 PM
1

Only person who can change your body is you. That being said as a heavily moderated and censored subreddit we allow posts only made by people who align with our political agenda...Oh wait that's /r/Feminism Never mind post away.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:43 PM
3

What? You're saying enforcing policies on ~350,000,000 people based on a sample size of a handful of individuals is irrational?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:39 PM
1

Those veterans would be 50% less male. I just can't understand why you think Men deserve nothing in exchange for signing their lives away.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:36 PM
1

That's a very good post. I've saved it for later.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:07 PM
2

I think you type with a lisp ;P
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:06 PM
1

So women have no responsibility to their country? Men should take it all on their own? Those thousands upon thousands of homeless veterans, many of which are disabled, didn't do anything worth an extra privilege?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:04 PM
1

Feminists often go "Oh my god, we can make semen no more men" (ignoring that semen produces male offspring, though I'd suppose they'd simply kill those off) but the research primarily takes place for men who ARE infertile and want children.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:02 PM
1

Let's not go down the "Feminist Art" wormhole. If you need motivation there's billions of songs that are inspirational, they don't EXCLUSIVELY have to pander. Let the artists do what they want.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:59 PM
9

TL;DR "Freedom of Association? What's that?"
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:58 PM
1

You couldn't even mention the homeless veterans, so much love in your arguments. It seems to me you're the one with no knowlege of the military.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:55 PM
4

I guess we could talk about how it's been IGNORED for so long Suicide being the #7 killer of men & boys http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2013/index.htm We could talk about how 80% of suicides are Men & Boys http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicide_factsheet-a.pdf But rather than talk about those who are quite literally dying, I suppose we should focus on those who aren't. We could ask the question "Why are boys moving from poisoning to far more deadly methods" or "Why are girls more likely t…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:54 PM
6

If you have two units, and one is clearly better than the other, are you going to send in the more capable unit or the less capable one? If I have a draft I have a lack of units. Send each unit to wherever is most suitable. If the male group is more capable then so be it. So, no, it will do jack shit as far as male casualties are concerned Some units are exemplary even among males, i.e. Navy Seals. Should we abolish those as well? The male units will be sent to where they're needed and capable, …
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:48 PM
1

So you want to put women there to take some bullets? To fulfill their responsibility, whether or not they die is their own issue. I do not own, control, or take responsibility for women. To me, it seems like you're much more concerned about making sure as many women get killed in war as men even if it means more people are going to die on a whole. To me it seems you simply don't care that men are dying at all. You seem to think the 50,000+ homeless veterans on a single night seem to be receiving…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:42 PM
6

Telling me to "Grow up" doesn't negate my argument. Women have equal responsibility, separating the units is a perfectly valid suggestion. Unless you can prove that doing so will not negate the loss of male lives due to female participation then you have no ground to stand on.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:22 PM
2

Not if they're in separate units.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:15 PM
5

Women owe nothing to men. Men owe nothing to women. If you give them an excuse to be weak, they will continue to do so. Should men who fail the tests on purpose be given a pass? Because I'm sure it would happen at far greater rates if such were the case.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:14 PM
3

It's plain to see how processing women instead of men harms the number of soldiers on the field. It's not "double" as you suggest, instead it's almost half. Process women as women and men as men then. Men are not responsible for the biology of others. Soldiers deserve care, and women soldiers are injured at 6x the rate of male soldiers. Their own ineptitude is their fault. So then, send women by themselves. Separate the units. Grow up. How DARE I suggest sex specific combat units as a retort to …
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:09 PM
2

As long as there's give and take I'm fine with it. I doubt there'll ever be feminists calling for "Reparations" for the men drafted in WWII and Vietnam (many of which actually couldn't vote, until the passage of the 26th amendment).
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:07 PM
1

Less dead male soldiers, more dead female soldiers. It's called equal responsibility.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:06 PM
2

Equality isn't possible. Time we finally realized it. Equality doesn't have be EXACT equality. Want a male only draft? Fine. Women lose their right to vote.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:48 PM
9

better ban the draft for everyone. Draft would get reinstated the moment war broke out. A law MUST be passed mandating not only equal draft numbers but also equal representation in combat.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:45 PM
13

Your sons deserve something in exchange for throwing their lives away, apparently you disagree. It's a fucked up world when you'll murder your songs - people who you respect - but excuse the belligerent ignorance of your daughters. You're just another person who thinks men dying is okay, you excuse it because for some inexplicable reason your daughters lives matter more.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:43 PM
8

And what do men deserve in exchange? Nothing? I.E. What they get now? Especially when women can vote on matters of war without ever having to worry about it. Fuck that. Slow down the rate at which we could raise troops if there is a need for them, as less women would qualify (but would still need to be processed). The draft is not a right, it's a responsibility. Either they have the responsibility to fight or they do not. Adding women doubles the number of boots we can put on the ground, conside…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:39 PM
9

As soon as war breaks out the draft would reappear so hard it would make their head spin. At the very least a law MUST be passed stating that any such laws must be equal. Even in combat roles.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:33 PM
20

Great for your daughters, death for your sons. I don't think that's fair.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:32 PM
1

Just making sure everyone get's to see feminism for what it is. Doesn't mean anything to you but you believe all sex is rape, most normal people find a brand new hatred and disdain for feminism. Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang and stomp while disrupting a female speaker talking about Me…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:29 PM
1

Yeah you're fucking insane. Have a good time in delusion "Humans are robot's, sex is rape, force equal outcome" land. Your fellow feminists will await you there: Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang and stomp while disrupting a female speaker talking about Men's rights. https://www.youtube.c…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:28 PM
1

Anyone who is unfit to be in combat shouldn't be there. Men or women. I thought I made that clear when I said putting random bodies on the field isn't going to accomplish anything. I thought I made it clear when I said it doesn't take a dick to take a bullet? It doesn't matter how many bodies you have on the field if they aren't able to perform the tasks necessary and carry their heavy gear and what not. A woman can hold a gun and point it the enemy same as anyone else. If a man goes down with a…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:26 PM
1

It could be just the layout of the charts (perhaps more traditional pie charts would be better). I wanted to put the male percentage in the middle since it's hard to tell the percentage otherwise. I'll double check my numbers on the excel sheets and if that's why the proportions are off.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 10:15 AM
1

I suppose it's poe's law, can't tell if he's a troll or the real thing. I've definitely wasted enough time though.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:25 AM
1

You didn't answer my question: There are women who COULD pass but they'd never want to i.e. They don't try as hard. Can men who fail the tests on purpose get a pass as well? Throwing random bodies on the field isn't going to accomplish anything though. It DOUBLES the amount of total bodies available for that purpose. Numbers on the field matter. Why ship 100 men, when you can ship 100 men AND 100 women? A draft is only done in a severe lack of personnel, women can be put on the battlefields to c…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:54 AM
1

I'm fine with the forced career-ing. What, the actual fuck. You can't be real. Are you trolling me? How about no draft at all. Sure, just suggest how women will be paying men back as a group according to the "Compensation" feminists always demand. Also: Name one single solitary right men have that women do not. "The right to reproduce without the burden of pregnancy. " Ah gotcha "I want to have kids, but biologically I am female. And because females get pregnant inoder to have offspring I am opp…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:29 AM
1

Holy shit, you're one of those "Heterosexual sex is rape" people aren't you. I am. Though, it is more complicated than that. I say all sexuality is inherently coerced. Well... the logical next assumption would be that multiple males would be having sex with the same female, and, like it many other mammals, the sex is very forced. That would indicate that the sex doing the forcing would be dominating. That's only the next assumption if your brain says "Women are incapable of consent and lack any …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:17 AM
1

Gotta make sure everyone sees feminism for what it is :) If you've got videos of MRAs behaving the same way I'd love to see them, but considering the differences in the movements I doubt you have any :)
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:06 AM
2

He should have given links like so: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:24 AM
1

Read each one and synthesize your findings on the subject. I've read much in feminist research and I've seen even more feminist behavior. I conclusively define feminism as a hate group that not only hates men but has no understanding of equality. Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang and stom…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:23 AM
1

"Facial Attractiveness"? Why would such a study prove your case? You can't just link to studies (many by feminists) and go "YEP THIS MAKE ME RIGHT" without explaining WHY. If you'd like to see Feminism in action rather than Feminism on Paper watch these: Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:21 AM
1

Yet weren't they the ones that decided to fight wars and mine mines? You mean the wars for resources to keep their families alive, you mean the mines from which we extracted metals, one of the PRIME capabilities that advanced humanity past the stone age? Yeah men did do that, women could just as easily have asked for the right to die in those mines. I don't know on the first one, regardless it proves nothing if they did not want to fight wars, and if they wanted males to continue fighting it is …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:11 AM
1

Did you not see how the mechanism of vaginal reproduction is by it's very nature forceful and dominant. Holy shit, you're one of those "Heterosexual sex is rape" people aren't you. The penis head is theorized to be shaped as such as a shovel to be most efficient at scooping out previous mates sperm --a benefit for sperm competition and eventual gene survival. And this is male domination how? Humans are animals yes, but we're by far the most intelligent animals in existence. "Men are dominant bec…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:00 AM
1

So you've given up then. You shouldn't have come here if you weren't interested in honest discussion. In the future: Don't start off by insinuating people are lying intentionally to mislead, especially without proof (Which you still have none of) Source, quoted straight from you: While a lot of these are spot on, a lot of these are purposefully misleading. When someone calls you out on your hostility, it'd be best to explain yourself and admit wrongdoing where appropriate. You can continue with …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:40 AM
1

Let's meet in the middle: Let's FORCE women to be 50% of every career, including careers like petroleum engineering and coal mining. Additionally women MUST be registered for the draft as well as to have affirmative action for previous male lives. We'll apply the same pressure to men. You probably think that's totalitarian but 50/50 is fair isn't it? Also: Name one single solitary right men have that women do not.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:34 AM
1

Because it is not a source, it is an amalgamation of sources. You accused me of not having evidence, so I linked to areas where evidence is readily available. I am not going to scour the web for citations that go in to detail about the science behind patriarchal theory. I've not the time for it. Those wikipedia pages certainly lay the groundwork for you to delve in on the subject if you are actually honest in pursuit of knowledge. Laying the "Groundwork" and proving that such a thing is factual …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:32 AM
1

It doesn't make you less pathetic for coming in, calling the OP a liar while being openly hostile, and then refusing to accept that you did so. Do I need to quote your first sentence again?
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:09 AM
1

The charts don't seem to be in line with the figures, which makes things look not as bad as they are. Not sure what you mean by this. The numbers are fully represented in the charts (I double checked). I think quality of life (global and domestic) and happiness (global and domestic) should be included aswell. Beside 3rd level enrollment there should be "gendered grants" aswell. Definitely a good place to start though I believe women report lower happiness than men in the U.S. (Declining if I rec…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:08 AM
1

You're just another person who doesn't really want equality. Came in called the OP a liar doing so intentionally Got mad when I called you out on your bullshit Refused to address the fact that you came in openly hostile Tried to blame the entirety of issues like homicide on "Testosterone"
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:05 AM
1

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/20/georgetown-feminists-demand-safe-space-because-of-conservative-lecturer/ http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/08/we-need-safe-spaces/ Feel free to google more examples ;) Clearly such strong women, that they need to hide from discussion. I quoted you VERBATIM: While a lot of these are spot on, a lot of these are purposefully misleading. (Emphasis mine) You insinuated that he was lying to you and doing so knowingly. You were outwardly malicious from the start. You're…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:04 AM
1

No silly, it's dumb women "I.E. Feminists" who want safe spaces :) Kind of like how dumb feminists are afraid of discussion so they dodge questions :) Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang and stomp while disrupting a female speaker talking about Men's rights. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:01 AM
1

I don't think its right women weren't being drafted, and nowadays, most women don't understand why they wouldn't be drafted also. I'd love to see a supporting survey\poll for this. The only one I could find was from 2002: http://www.gallup.com/poll/5152/drafting-women-remains-controversial.aspx 46% of women voted Yes to the draft for women. That is not a majority. But its not a woman's fault that the law was and is set up for men to be drafted only. A bunch of men made that rule. Get your fuckin…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:00 AM
1

Gifs and wikipedia links you're quite the scholar.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:48 PM
1

Because if they don't lower those tests for women, you won't see many women being forced into combat as they won't pass. I see what you're saying, and I don't think those tests should matter in the instance of a draft, it's essentially us saying "We're very very screwed and all of of our best people have perished". The draft is about putting bodies on the field, and women can just as well do that. There are women who COULD pass but they'd never want to i.e. They don't try as hard. Can men who fa…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:31 PM
1

My facts show that men had obvious downsides throughout history, it was part of the deal - give and take. You have no facts not a single one.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:29 PM
2

Golly links to wikipedia! Let me try! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynocentrism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriarchy Yes, humans are sexually dimorphic. That allows males to be physically stronger, while women have the unique capability of birth. I guess clearly we're all oppressed by women because I can acknowledge that men/women are different and Wikipedia has articles on Matriarchy. Wikipedia is not a solid source, it doesn't prove anything nor is it in any way free of bias i.e.: http://…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:28 PM
2

Biologically, socially, and physically the evidence is clear. A system of equivalent exchange is an odd way to describe a prototypical example of a dominant/submissive relationship. Says the person who gave no evidence. If it is so clear, why can't you produce any? I think the subjugation of one class over the other fits nicely. Except none of this was subjugation, and you've provided no evidence for such a claim. As for your waste of time attempt to source everything under the son about war you…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:22 PM
2

Cool. Looking forward to your input! :)
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:29 AM
2

Are you coming back?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:21 AM
1

Good to know.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:20 AM
2

The parenthesis were a tough call. I'm glad you like the citations let me know if anything else can be done, and check back in as I develop the next set of posters.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:20 AM
3

And the police will never believe you. And they're legally obligated NOT to believe you. "The height and weight of the parties" is literally one of the criteria i.e. Men are guilty by default as they are generally bigger. Even if no other factors can be verified, the larger of the two parties is by default the predominant aggressor and will be arrested and likely spending the night in jail. http://www.stopvaw.org/determining_the_predominant_aggressor
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:18 AM
1

You're exactly right, but you're missing the point that the feminists are the one with the near-stranglehold over the mainstream. Something they continue to exert by force: Feminist shouts at speakers (discussing free speech) telling them "They're not wanted here" and that forcing them to leave is not violating Free Speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY1H1rZL53I Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euz…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:14 AM
1

I'm an anti-feminist and an MRA. I suggest you look into Karen Straughan she's an anti-feminist and MRA as well
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:13 AM
3

The problem is you're thinking that we're the same as feminists. We don't claim these problems are the result of discrimination, they could very well be the result of other issues or simply a lack of male advocacy. The point isn't to say "We're being discriminated against!!", rather to say "Look, we have real issues can you please stop calling us 'privileged' and interrupting our discussions on these issues?" Feminist shouts at speakers (discussing free speech) telling them "They're not wanted h…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:11 AM
2

If they "get going" the cure is video footage. Nothing burns those types more than exposure to the public.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:04 AM
2

I still think my poster is better, if for no other reason that it's got citations and is readable: https://imgur.com/WWozf7O (I know it has less content, it's part of a series) https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ The OP said he intends to improve it and I certainly hope he does. He has an obvious interest in it and regardless of the quality it certainly had a large effect.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:03 AM
4

Where in the chart does it say "WOMEN ARE TO BLAME FOR THIS" or "THIS IS ALL WOMEN'S FAULT"? It doesn't it is simply saying "Look, men have real issues and we want to discuss them. These really are gendered issues and we want to help the men in these situations. In order for us, you have to stop talking about who you think is privileged and start talking about who is suffering". It's far less aimed at women and far MORE aimed at the feminists who actively fight against discussion: Feminists atte…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:02 AM
1

Nobody wants men to start going on about how "Men are oppressed!!" either. It's important that we don't go down the same retarded and bigoted path they did.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:56 AM
2

The point with workplace deaths is that the constantly talked about wage gap statistic doesn't take even things like occupation into account. No one here expects 50% Men and 50% Women in deadly jobs. The only people enjorcing such "Equal outcome thinking" tends to be mainstream feminists (though Christina Hoff Sommers and Janice Fiamengo and other reasonable feminists are fighting against it).
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:55 AM
2

Am I oppressing you if I still find it funny despite the fact I didn't get your pre-written consent?
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:52 AM
1

Nope. You didn't fix the biggest problem: No Citations https://imgur.com/WWozf7O https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:52 AM
3

Sorry for all the well cited sources, in comparison to the zero you gave as guess that means you win the argument, in backward world of feminism. Besides I'd rather be a "dunce" than a monster who thinks women don't care about their children, you're a real humanitarian.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:46 AM
7

The entire concept of privilege is fucking ridiculous, it's just a way of saying 'Sorry, but we claim we're disadvantaged so you can't get help" and men are fucking sick of it. This is no proof. You're doing the same. I listed a privilege women have, a legal RIGHT they have, that men do not. Men can be drafted and killed. Women can not. You have given no examples of "Male Privilege". You are the one without examples. Why not fight for gender equality together? Good question, why can't feminists …
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:44 AM
1

If you find any mind changing evidence I'd love to see it as well.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:58 AM
3

I wouldn't underestimate the significance of a 300 horse pile up.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:31 AM
5

It's so odd that you can bring up a thing like history, but completely ignore the historical dominance of one sex over the other. Prove that such a thing ever existed. You give no evidence, and I gave mine. Feminist thinking: "Other people cite evidence for their claims, I just have to act astonished and claim utter bullshit that has no merit!"
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:30 AM
3

Are you denying millennia male dominance? Yes, do you have any evidence to prove that "Males dominated" and that it wasn't a system of equivalent exchange? So it could just as fairly be said that women don't love their children. They do it only to ensure their genes survive. Are you even human? Yes and yes. Jesus Christ dude. During which time: they fed, protected, and provided for them. That system is what made humanity strong. Yes. But that does not mean it was not oppressive. The two are not …
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:29 AM
0

I quoted you VERBATIM: While a lot of these are spot on, a lot of these are purposefully misleading. (Emphasis mine) You insinuated that he was lying to you and doing so knowingly. You were outwardly malicious from the start. I hope you aren't always this insecure and easily offended when someone invades your little "safe-space". There's no safe space here I'm ridiculing you for jumping here calling the OP a liar acting on intent. You're being a piece of shit and you refuse to admit you were wro…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:07 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/user/StudioBrule/videos She also occasionally features on Christina Hoff Sommers videos if I recall correctly. She's very smart and she speaks very professionally.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:06 AM
2

Never been there I was told a long time ago to stay away lol.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:04 AM
2

Group A: Wants to mark Group B as racists, rapists, and murderers. Violently prevents any discussion group B attempts to have, even if members from Group A are part of the discussion. Group A has an ideology called "GroupB-iarchy" which states that Group B is the direct cause of all Group B's issues. Group B: Wants to have discussions on issues that literally kill large numbers of those in Group B. One such cause is the #7 leading cause of death to Group B members. Group A argues that Group B ca…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:04 AM
4

Just because men have it worse in some categories doesn't mean they aren't privileged in some other categories. Just because women have it worse in some categories doesn't mean they aren't privileged in other categories. "It is pretty obvious that after centuries of ruling the world men are far more privileged in a lot of categories. Just because it's not all of the categories doesn't mean that the male privileged doesn't exist. " Name three, no I'll go easy on you, name one thing a man can do t…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:55 AM
5

The men's rights movement is a toddler, it may very well one day go past it's goals and become a monster like Feminism. Many feminists like Christina Hoff Sommers try to reign it in, but I'm being honest when I say Feminism as it is has serious and undeniable issues. There's just no grounds for believing the OP, everyone should be critical of things like this and part of the problems of feminism are caused by not being critical. Just my two cents, if there's reason to believe the OP was biased t…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:51 AM
1

That was absolutely brutal. I think I actually died a little from that.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:35 AM
2

What would call it? Guess it comes down to how we define social systems and how we define gendered roles Culture + Biological Disposition due to Sexual Dimorphism. Like baking soda and vinegar. The lense you view the world through colours everything. Not if you're looking through a clear lens. If feminists would take of their rose colored glasses they'd see that.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:35 AM
3

Feminist Mary Koss fought to keep such the case in her paper "Detecting the Scope of Rape : A Review of Prevalence Research Methods" “Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman. p. 206”
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:32 AM
1

Homicide isn't okay just because it's perpetrated by people of the same gender. "Suicide (Who's at risk for suicide) "Men 4x more likely" : http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicide_factsheet-a.pdf Workplace Death (page 8): http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0013.pdf Undergrad Enrollment (Figure 1 & paragraph under it): http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cha.asp Homelessness (Page 62): https://www.hudexchange.info/onecpd/assets/File/2014-AHAR-Part-2.pdf Boys are also being left…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:31 AM
4

Homelessness, falling out of education, and more. But let's not talk about that, right? Suicide (Who's at risk for suicide) "Men 4x more likely" : http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicide_factsheet-a.pdf Workplace Death (page 8): http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0013.pdf Undergrad Enrollment (Figure 1 & paragraph under it): http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cha.asp Homelessness (Page 62): https://www.hudexchange.info/onecpd/assets/File/2014-AHAR-Part-2.pdf Boys are also bei…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:27 AM
9

Please find the videos of MRAs doing this: Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang and stomp while disrupting a female speaker talking about Men's rights. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yg-f7fC0Uw Feminists pull fire alarm to disrupt meeting about Men's Rights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:26 AM
2

Only because some people don't realize they cannot create arbitrary definitions just because the real definition doesn't suit their purpose. Men are suffering, I don't give a flying fuck if you think women are oppressed (and they aren't), the fact of the matter is men deserve help as much as anyone else. No bigot, not even feminists, will be allowed to prevent the men suffering from getting help with their bullshit claims of privilege. You want privilege? Try, bitching until you get the right to…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:22 AM
1

The patriarchy is mythical creature like Cthulu or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:19 AM
0

"Golly, I only walked in and said they had intended to lie to me! Then I said that hormones were the cause of male homicides and didn't even suggest, hint, or allow for any other possibilities! I'm like so confused as to why people might think I'm not open!" If you want a discussion don't walk in and say "YOU'RE ALL LYING AND YOU'RE DOING IT INTENTIONALLY TO SERVE YOUR PURPOSES" Just an FYI.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:16 AM
1

You mock me for assuming I'm trying to read OP's mind. For calling him a liar who had intended to lie, yes. And yet you start off this comment saying that I didn't meet your expectations in my comment.... (Which I would've only been able to do had I been able to read your mind). No mind reading is necessary to know how not to act when engaging someone in discourse. It's really simple: Don't walk in and call them liars who are doing so with the purpose of misleading, especially when you have no s…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:14 AM
1

Holy fuck you're dense. Violence is a side effect of things like homelessness and suicide, both of which were covered in his infographic. and no you didn't say they were "Misleading" you said they were PURPOSEFULLY Misleading. You immediately walked in and assumed it was full of intentional and bold faced lies.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:11 AM
3

Because that is how systemic oppression of one class over another works? I don't even know what you are trying to argue. You're like saying, "men have had bad things happen in x, y, and z so the historical subjugation of women doesn't mean anything!" Sorry, but that is not how gender politics works. One sex has literally been DOMINANT over the other, and being part of that dominant sex comes with an inherent privilege. It manifests itself in nearly infinite ways, notably an intrinsic sense of th…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:09 AM
7

Irrelevant. All irrelevant. Are you trying to imply that males for some reason did all this protecting altruistically? No. They did it to maintain their own power --to dominate more. They may have evolved to do so more efficiently, often at the behest of the other sex. Gotcha, you believe men are evil and only did this to hurt women. You're a bigot. Nuff said. That is a lie. An extremely silly lie. Feminism has made strides in allowing for a less hyper-masculinized male, it's only the pushback b…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:00 AM
6

Yes a traditional society that said: Men will die in war, men will do the dangerous and awful work and in return men will receive privileges. Even now, women give nothing in exchange for their right to vote. The received it long before WWII and Vietnam and yet no women died for that right. Fun fact many men who couldn't vote died for that right: http://www.history.com/topics/the-26th-amendment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RozEFVPDxeg Women have always lived in parity with men, and rules have …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:55 PM
1

That doesn't factor in repeat attempts. A man can kill himself only once, but women repeat multiple times. Nor does it take into account the severity of the attempts. Nor does it answer the question "Why do women and girls make what are far more likely to be calls for help while boys and men utilize some of the most brutal and horrifying ways immediately?" The motives behind the attempts are not known, but it's far more likely that the male victims were going in with much greater intent on dying…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:47 PM
1

Definitely.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:44 PM
1

It's because of people like you that this sub doesn't get the recognition it deserves. You get so easily offended when someone doesn't give the issues you posted about elsewhere (that I've never seen) enough "lip service". You called the side effect of those issues "Purposefully misleading". You were openly claiming it was intentionally misleading, how you can't realize the hostility in that is beyond me.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:44 PM
1

I don't expect you to list them all, I expected you to list one. Or at the very least hint that there was one. Saying "There are other things behind this, but testosterone is often working against you guys" would have been more than enough. You were dismissive, and treated them like they were put there for fluff While a lot of these are spot on, a lot of these are purposefully misleading. Yes, I'm so glad you can read the OPs mind. You must obviously know his purpose for including them. If you'r…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:43 PM
2

Maybe the reason no one will have a legitimate conversation with you about men's rights is because you blow up over someone who is actually trying to agree with you. The way you initialized the conversation appeared openly dismissive, but yes I should have done more to remain calm.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:38 PM
2

A recent study of DV is here: http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176%2Fpn.42.15.0031a Worth noting that it's a global issue: http://pb.rcpsych.org/content/35/1/33.1
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:23 PM
2

Yeah, I'm familiar with all that already. I've been lurking here a while. Japan's also got similar issues, though for slightly different reasons. Japan's a very interesting country, especially given how they've basically stopped reproducing. Do you happen to have the hard statistic for male suicides per year on hand? I was planning to look for it, myself, but you might have the reference on hand. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm Is that what you're looking for? I like Karen. She's a v…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:21 PM
1

And I encourage you to at least appear open when discussing these issues. Nothing you said insinuated that you thought this men deserved help. As I stated in my other posts men are the majority of the homeless, and boys are failing out of school, these are far more likely causes for violent behavior especially consider that the overwhelming majority of men are not violent. You did not even give lip service to these causes, I could rewrite your post a thousand ways and all of them would be more a…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:18 PM
4

I love the idea of this subreddit. But I think the reason you guys don't get the acknowledgment you deserve, is because you treat people who aren't aggressively touting men's rights as an enemy. A large portion of that is due to the fact that Feminists routinely shift the blame onto men. If we discuss the issues we're forcibly shut up: Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:14 PM
1

A far more recent study is here: http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176%2Fpn.42.15.0031a Worth noting that it's a global issue: http://pb.rcpsych.org/content/35/1/33.1
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:12 PM
2

Note that when I say solider I mean people who are given specific gear, basic training, and whose task is to defeat the enemy. And who have no previous experience as a soldier, and who will be forced to fight and die purely because they have a penis. Men get NOTHING from this. It is a responsibility, not all men are equally capable of fighting but all men are forced to register. A rights is a right, and cannot be revoked. And a responsibility is a responsibility and it must apply to EVERYONE who…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:06 PM
3

I don't think that women should be drafted, simply because when a draft is called, it's in time of dire need to soldiers. When a draft is called, the soldiers are dead, they're sending primarily untrained civilians. The draft process saw many poorly/un-trained young men entering the battlefield. It would seem like a waste to throw less-than-capable bodies onto a field in the name of equality. And I refuse to get thrown to the wolves because I have a penis and she doesn't. A bullet kills people e…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:49 PM
1

I wouldn't have taken it so harshly but it appeared outwardly dismissive, you didn't even mention the other factors involved. Yes some men do put themselves in violent situations, but many more do not, and even of those who put themselves there I don't think they deserve it. I don't know what drove those men to do that and "Hormones" seems like a weak argument when it's clearly not affecting the vast majority of men. Regardless of how they got there, they all deserve help. I wouldn't say a woman…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:44 PM
1

I can try to rotate them around if you'd like? The way the chart program I'm using works is it gives me four options of the "point of divergence" between the two, essentially where the two split. Currently it's set to "North" i.e. the male part starts at the right and increases (essentially filling clockwise). I can set it to east, west, or south do you have a specific preference?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:37 PM
1

Ah yes, the most appropriate term would probably be EARNINGS gap. As women simply earn less.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:35 PM
2

America. America here as well, Missouri actually. The pattern actually repeats itself across western countries. In the U.K. it's ~78% (Table 1 http://www.samaritans.org/sites/default/files/kcfinder/branches/branch-96/files/Suicide_statistics_report_2015.pdf) In Finland males are 3x as likely (http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/finl.pdf) It's a global pattern that set in around the turn of the century, and it is a legitimate gender issue. I've been spouting statistics like that a lot recently…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:34 PM
2

Can you point me to the women fighting for such a thing to be allowed? The fact of the matter is most women don't want it, those that do should certainly be allowed. Look at the draft for inspiration, at no point during the process of securing the vote did feminists\women in general seek the draft, why? Because it's not a privilege but a responsibility. Up until the 26th amendment (throughout WWII and Vietnam) many young men were drafted who couldn't even vote: http://www.history.com/topics/the-…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:23 PM
1

I'm the author, it's part of a series for plastering around Mizzou. The discussion is ongoing here:https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ The latest iteration is here https://imgur.com/waxCTuZ. I'm currently doing research for the second set but I want to make sure there's no additional glaring flaws first and I haven't gotten many comments on the thread.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:19 PM
2

No, she stated that men have the tendency to be more violent than women. That in no way implies that all men are violent. And I would take issue with anyone who says that all men are violent. Testosterone, in both men and women, can make a person more aggressive. Men naturally have higher levels of testosterone, thus higher propensity for aggression. Aggression has a higher likelihood of leading to violence. Thus those with higher levels of testosterone and higher propensity for aggression have …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:16 PM
3

It's worth pointing out, not as discrimination, but as a constantly overlooked fact. Especially when the earnings gap gets national attention without accounting for something as basic as occupation. Edit: Also I don't think you deserve a negative score, you made a fair point so have an upvote.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:00 PM
2

Here's my poster: https://imgur.com/waxCTuZ Sources (as links): Suicide (Who's at risk for suicide) "Men 4x more likely" : http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicide_factsheet-a.pdf Workplace Death (page 8): http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0013.pdf Undergrad Enrollment (Figure 1 & paragraph under it): http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cha.asp Homelessness (Page 62): https://www.hudexchange.info/onecpd/assets/File/2014-AHAR-Part-2.pdf Homicide (Table 1): https://www.fbi.gov/a…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:58 PM
4

Domestic Violence (Summarized very simply): Mutual Violence: Both partners beat each other. According to Erin Pizzey, Founder of the first battered women's shelter in the UK, most DV is mutual. She argues that Domestic Violence is a repeated cycle of family violence and that it isn't a gendered issue. Non-Reciprocated Violence: One partner usually beats the hell out of the other but no self defense or revenge is enacted. In these cases it is usually women who are the aggressor: "In recent years …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:49 PM
2

The questions you brought up are good questions, do we have answers? Won't know until more than just a handful of people in the MRM actually discuss it. I believe men are naturally "predisposed" ,if that's the correct word, to aggression... 6 millions years of harsh survival have measurable cognitive sexual dimorphism. I would agree with that, it's that same aggression that makes men more likely to ask for promotions. something about this urks me, can't pinpoint exactly what. Well let me know if…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:43 PM
3

To put it plainly: 1) We want to help men who are victims of homicide, suicide, and incarceration. 2) She decides to blame all men for the actions of a few as if that justifies the violence. She provides NOT A SINGLE OUNCE of justification that ANY SINGLE ONE of these crimes are primarily or only caused by "testosterone". So we will simply discount all rape as "Female emotional instability" and if you were to post an infographic about rape we'll simply say "Oh, even the convicted rapes are all j…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:20 PM
4

She just as equally implied that testosterone makes all men violent which is a notably false fact. The overwhelming majority of men are not violent which is why violent crime rates in our country have been decreasing for decades. A far more correct statement then: "But you can't discount the tendency of women to be more emotionally unstable than men. Estrogen is often working against you girls." Regardless of whether there is a lack of estrogen or an abundance the point remains the same - Estrog…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:15 PM
1

-There are too many shades of blue; if you're going to make the title blue, make it the same shade as the male blue parts on the charts, and same with the other blue accents. When in doubt, black goes better than different shades of the same color. I didn't even realize they were different colors! I thought the underline itself was black as well, thank you for those fixes. I can see you're trying to keep the chart titles simple, which is good for posters, statistics, etc, but the only one that i…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:08 PM
4

I wasn't saying you were a feminist nor did I assume you were one. I was simply trying to point out that yes the numbers may be obvious but there are still very important questions that can be asked. We could just say "Boys and men will probably just keep killing themselves, they must just be like that" or we can take a cautious and humanitarian approach and say "What if they aren't just like that? What if we can help?" and have the discussion anyways.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:58 PM
3

Certainly, they can get to a point where they're almost meaningless.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:55 PM
3

I'd encourage you talk about these things. I am talking about these things, I am doing so by starting a discussion using posters. Most people don't believe that men have issues. Primarily due to the Feminists who routinely prevent discussion: Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism bang and stomp wh…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:54 PM
2

The statistics are LITERALLY rape statistics. They're there to indicate the fact that rape is very very very rare. Certainly the majority of rape victims are female, but that doesn't mean we should ignore male victims or make the entire issue into a far bigger fiasco than it is.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:39 PM
4

As someone who also cares about this issues deeply I want to make this suggestion your first priority: CITATIONS, CITATIONS, CITATIONS. Links, publication names, Authors, and table\page numbers whenever possible. Your lack of citations is causing people to doubt even well known facts like the suicide epidemic: Men are 4x as likely to attempt suicide: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicide_factsheet-a.pdf Suicide is the 7th leading cause of death in males: http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:36 PM
8

What drives young boys to take such violent ways out of life? Why do girls choose what are proven to be very unsuccessful methods? Does the suicide stat account for repeat attempts? What if the real ratio is even higher? Are the support levels for Males and Females equivalent, who is more likely to make a cry for help? Do the differences in behavior differ between males and females, should be aware of unique warning signs? None of these questions will be addressed if we don't look at it as a gen…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:32 PM
1

I honestly don't know anything about Jeb Bush. I'm not sure anyone would really notice.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:21 PM
1

Only in regards to Politicians. Is it a common thing?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:17 PM
10

He does list some criteria for using Pie Charts: Whenever there is similarity in the information available, a pie chart is not the right chart to use. I believe he means similarity in size. Whenever there are multiple (3 or more) different points of data, a pie chart is not the right chart to use. Only two on my chart (Men & Women) and I believe only two on the OPs (The chart makes me want to gouge my eyes out so I won't check). Pie charts are very easy to abuse. Fully understandable. A pie char…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:15 PM
1

Rape isn't really all that common: [1] Attempted Rape is incredibly low for students and non-students in the most vulnerable age group. "For the period 1995–2013, females ages 18 to 24 not enrolled in a post-secondary school were 1.2 times more likely to experience rape and sexual assault victimization (7.6 per 1,000), compared to students in the same age range (6.1 per 1,000) (table 1)"http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf [1a] The rate of Completed Rapes is even lower: "The rate o…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:06 PM
3

This should be a much better (and fully and properly cited chart) https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0 The discussion on it (and the rest of the series) will happen here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:03 PM
0

The graphic greatly lacks sources. This one is better (First of a series): https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0 Regarding the rates: "Men are about four times more likely than women to die from suicide." http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicide_factsheet-a.pdf Suicide is the #7 killer of men and boys: http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2013/index.htm Hope that clears up the issues. You were likely talking about attempts (Which be as minimal as non-threatening cuts, note that women can make many attempts …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:02 PM
1

More like "requesting any source" https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:59 PM
6

Take /r/Feminism for example, I bet you could post the most moderate and sincere question and still get banned. By all means give it a shot.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:59 PM
8

Work with rational-minded feminists. Yes they fucking exist. We know that and we do. Christina Hoff Sommers and Janice Fiamenco are routinely part of the MRA circle. The problem is that feminists dominate the discussion and ROUTINELY stop it from happening. Feminists attend meeting on Men's Issues and blow noisemakers in order to prevent discussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Feminists disrupt forum about battered husbands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM Feminism ba…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:56 PM
1

I make jokes all the time, I thought he meant it literally lol.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:54 PM
2

Men are also responsible for the overwhelming majority of water production, sanitation, food production, and energy production. But we don't refuse to help those that suffer from those issues. Part of the problem is helping those men who do turn to violence and ensuring there are alternative solutions available. Violence tends to start at a young age, and boys are increasingly dropping out of school. http://keranews.org/post/inside-dropout-crisis-why-boys-leave-school-and-why-they-return There's…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:53 PM
2

The issue is that we've reached relative parity and yet women receive affirmative action. If you still believe it's not a relevant point of discussion I can remove it. I intend to do the dropout rates for young boys in lower branches of education as well so I could see it as a viable replacement. I'd do Life Expectancy and mortality rates for all the top diseases. And maybe health spending. I'll certainly do that. Some issues require more information (For example many would consider it misleadin…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:51 PM
41

Is this any better? https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0 Why are pie charts inherently bad? Do you have a preferred styling? What is your justification? I'd love to know. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:48 PM
3

Do you think this one survives without the legend? https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0 I'd love any criticism here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ There's going to be a series of posters. I don't feel you can cram all this information together on one poster without being misleading.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:47 PM
4

The lack of citations is literally the worst part. I'm making a series of posters about it (Certain issues such as domestic violence will need their own posters as to not be misleading) to post around my university. The discussion is happening here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ The current version of the first poster is here: https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0 It's great to hear "Oh that's great" but you sound like a skeptic which is honestly far more valuable, it w…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:46 PM
2

I'm making a series of posters (For distribution around my university) would you tell me what you like most about this poster? (Besides what you've previously stated) The series of posters is being discussed here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ The present version of the first poster is currently here: https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:43 PM
3

Is this one any better: https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0 I made sure to add the actual citations for stats as well. It's part of a series of posters, which I talked about here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:41 PM
4

Fathers rights groups have been consistently fighting to pass an Equal Parenting bill (50/50 custody unless one parent is unfit) for decades but feminists have been routinely fighting against it i.e. National Organization for Women: http://www.nownys.org/archives/leg_memos/oppose_a00330.html
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:40 PM
6

If we can get down to those being our primary issues I think we'll have a lot to be happy about.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:38 PM
2

You forgot we focus on real issues such as suicide (#7 killer of males http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2013/index.htm) rather than minutia like "Micro Aggression". We also don't blow up issues to make them seem larger than they are i.e. the "1-in-4 women are raped" stat. [1] Attempted Rape is incredibly low for students and non-students in the most vulnerable age group. "For the period 1995–2013, females ages 18 to 24 not enrolled in a post-secondary school were 1.2 times more likely to experience r…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:37 PM
3

Why can't we just look at the inequalities in society and address them individually? Because those inequalities primarily have male victims [2], that is why feminists focus on primarily non-issues i.e. Rape [1,1a,1b]. It's not about turning it into "OH POOR OPPRESSED MALES!", It's about saying "Look, we've listened to you for a very long time. A lot of us are dying from things like suicide, the 7th leading cause of death for men [3], and it is about time we address these issues". This poster is …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:35 PM
0

Can you cite an instance of the feminist movement lobbying to be part of the draft?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:30 PM
8

Keep in this mind when speaking about the Wage Gap as well ;) That being said, the military does need to ensure women can be drafted (If I were a feminist, I suppose we'd have to call for affirmative action)
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:30 PM
1

Citation Needed. That being said, it's highly unlikely that it accounts for all factors. I.E. The type of hours worked: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/flex.pdf (See Table 4) Men work more Night Shift hours in every category. There is an even greater difference in Evening shifts with men working more hours than women.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:28 PM
7

Yes, complaining about SUICIDE is as bad as bitching about a wage gap that doesn't exist. Feminists are too busy complaining about men sitting with their legs apart to focus on actual issues.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:26 PM
11

There's plenty but honestly most are very low quality, with either broken links or a lack of cited sources. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ I'm trying to make a series of posters that is not only factually correct but not misleading or questionable as well.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:25 PM
2

What would you say about my citations in my poster here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ I'm not an English major so suggestions/corrections would be fantastic.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:24 PM
1

Could be better, the source materials aren't even linked. I've got an alternative series going here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ We should come up with some high quality materials, I'm going to spread them around my campus.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:23 PM
6

"someone or something that is harmed by an unpleasant event (such as an illness or accident)" Source: Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dictionary Would you say suicide is an unpleasant event? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/victim
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:21 PM
1

Kind of glorifies it, we want to stop suicide remember?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:20 PM
5

We're pushing ourselves to work as hard as we can Which is a good thing, and it's something that should be encouraged. Feminists routinely and constantly ignore this when citing nonsense statistics about the wage gap. The fact of the matter is: Men work harder and longer. we're taking enormous risks because we've all hive-agreed that it's good for men to be that way. You're out at night and a man jumps out with a gun, who takes the bullet? Chances are it's you. You AND HER will assume you to be …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:20 PM
1

Is this better? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ I cited the page numbers as well as the links and authors when applicable.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:01 PM
1

Is this better: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:00 PM
1

Thanks, I'll use this one instead. I'll update this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:58 PM
3

Feminists implemented Affirmative Action driving forward with it to the point where men are only 44% of undergraduate enrollment. We should institute an egalitarian draft policy AND enforce affirmative action for drafts in the past, after all it's the feminist thing to do.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:55 PM
6

Your combat death stats are skewed because men have a majority in the military Because women don't sign up. and women weren't even allowed in combat positions until recently Women got the vote with the 19th amendment, at NO POINT have they ever fought for equal representation in the draft. Up until the 26th amendment young men could be drafted WHILE not being able to vote. http://www.history.com/topics/the-26th-amendment Keep in mind all across the world feminists weren't just ignoring the fact …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:53 PM
12

Testosterone is often working against you guys. Would you consider it sexist to say Women are emotional unstable as Estrogen is working against them?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:49 PM
1

So Arial? Edit: Better? https://imgur.com/p8qvgt0
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:45 PM
-3

If you made a graph simply for perpetrators of domestic violence (regardless of reciprocity) it would look much different. Citation needed. A graph also should be made for which gender is more likely to be killed in a domestic violence incident (women). It is (of course) women - because they are the physically weaker sex. For the prison population and chance of incarceration, the number of crimes the person has committed really needs to be accounted for. If you've committed crimes in the past, o…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:45 PM
2

Would you prefer suicide "perpetrators"? http://www.dictionary.com/browse/victim "someone or something that is harmed by an unpleasant event (such as an illness or accident)" Seems to fit rather well.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:32 PM
7

I did my best to squeeeeze all that in: https://imgur.com/E7etnd0 Edit: moved the discussion to https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4jcj3k/making_posters/ Any other thoughts?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:30 PM
1

Fixed it and made some general changes (Citing the specific pages and tables for example) https://imgur.com/E7etnd0
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:29 PM
1

What do you think of the changes I made here? https://imgur.com/E7etnd0
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:29 PM
1

Does this one look better or worse? https://imgur.com/E7etnd0
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:29 PM
6

The wage gap does exist and part of the reason it exists IS BECAUSE men work dangerous jobs which of course give hazard pay. Edit: Not to mention occupation in general, hours worked, behavioral differences etc.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:23 PM
1

It's so incredibly obvious, I don't know how I didn't notice that!
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:10 PM
1

I've also just realized the graph on workplace deaths is wrong (Should be 92% male according to the Census For Occupational Injury).
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:09 PM
1

The workplace death graph is wrong. It should be 92% male.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:08 PM
1

The workplace death graph is wrong. It should be 92% male.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:08 PM
1

The workplace death graph is wrong. It should be 92% male. I need to fix that, what colors would you suggest?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:08 PM
1

Oh god you're right. It should be far more male deaths. I must have pasted the wrong graph!
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:08 PM
1

Consider it like a life raft. It probably maybe hopefully won't be necessary but it's here in case it is.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:58 PM
1

No one is arguing to relax the physical requirements for military combat roles just so some women can fulfill them. We, in fact, argue against it regularly. They should still be required to go through the same training. Saying "You don't have to do combat" provides incentives for them to FAIL training and avoid combat. Women have the legal responsibility to risk their lives for this country, men shouldn't risk death if women don't.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:57 PM
0

I would support that as well, but as you can see, it's filled to the brim. If I add this additional information I would likely have to increase my poster size which would be very costly. I'll shop around for Poster producers in the Columbia MO area again and see if an increase in poster size is viable. I've also considered using QR codes rather than links (allowing me to put the publication date and page/table number directly next to it). Any additional thoughts in that regard?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:55 PM
0

I do not use this infographic for a few reasons: http://icasualties.org/oif/females.aspx is a dead link http://defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf is a dead link HatsRCool is not a well known or scholarly website. Many of the links are not immediately noticable for which source they fit. I.E. Which claim does icasualties support? I've made the following infographic which has links (all with annotations along side) which I believe is a better starting point. http://i.imgur.com/N4c4aIr.png
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:47 PM
2

Does the admin approve your posters ? Never asked for approval, many posters are simply posted everywhere, some are even just troll posters. Or do you just post them? Just going to post them. Haven't done so yet, primarily due to the cost of full color posters. I've saved up quite a bit of money but I'm sure I'll need more. Do your posters get taken down or vandalized? I'm sure they will, I intend to create a great number of spares. If it becomes a war of attrition then so be it. I was previousl…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:45 PM
1

If you have any suggestions or you get any feedback I'd love to hear it. I've got some corroborating sources but I'd like to keep the poster in a normal 8.5" x 11" format (Thus the series of posters) which makes including them hard, that is why I primarily used government sources.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:38 PM
1

Yeah that link is broken.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:36 PM
2

Another victim of the silent epidemic. According to the CDC it's the 7th leading cause of death for males in America: http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2010/index.htm Do you live in Europe or in America? I have attempted suicide in the past, and though it caused a lot of harm to me physically I'm still very much alive. I'm sorry your brother did not get the same second chance that I got. How old was he if you don't mind me asking? I had just turned 18 when it happened to me.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:27 PM
7

I'd recommend the circle graph at this link, I made it myself. http://i.imgur.com/N4c4aIr.png The improvement comes from the ACTUAL sources being listed with direct links. I intend to spread these around on Campus come the Fall 2016 semester and there will be two or three different posters covering different issues (I'm still doing research). I'm looking into putting QR codes in for the links as well.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:23 PM
61

Not a fan. Prove the ACTUAL link to the sources. These are better: http://imgur.com/a/mYAc4 EDIT: The graph for workplace deaths is wrong due to a copy-paste issue
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:21 PM
1

They didn't provide any citation for their claim.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:28 AM
0

If I walk past a woman and yell "HEY HOT STUFF" I've committed no crime. "And yes, it is harassment." Harassment is a crime you fucking moron. http://definitions.uslegal.com/h/harassment/ If they were legally committing harassment you could have them arrested and charged. Harassment requires repeated action that is known to have been unwanted. I.E. The woman must - ACT LIKE AN ADULT - and say that she is not interested. At which point any further behavior is harassment. "but it is a shitty thing…
/r/MensRights07/05/16 04:17 AM
1

Of course it's cancer, Feminism will ruin anything it touches.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:40 AM
1

I suppose we all agree on one thing with feminists "Feminism is a dirty word". Edit: I suppose the real question is OP - Do Men in the west have any right women do not? If you can find a single example you'd be the first.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:32 AM
1

Feminism has nothing to do with equality, and it has nothing to do with Women's rights. It may at one time had something to do with it (i.e. Voting) but that is no longer the case (Though it's worth mentioning that Feminists LOVE talking about the 19th amendment, but forcing them to mention the 26th amendment - i.e. the one that allowed all those young men being drafted to vote - is like pulling teeth). Women have never been oppressed, there have always been rights afforded at a cost, women simp…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:31 AM
1

Catcalling is not a crime, nor is it even within 1000 miles of being "harassment".
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:25 AM
1

Trump isn't the topic of discussion here. The topic is: Did Lewindowsky commit a crime, if so should he be fired from his career position (Note that this isn't a job at mcdonalds), and should we jump to a conclusion prior to a trial.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:46 AM
1

The band has broken up, not all of the members may be worth supporting.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:31 AM
1

Who the hell is Saunders?
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:08 AM
1

Feminism is a hate movement: Why blame feminism? I mean it's not like they fought to keep children away from their fathers, even though mothers would have had equal custody? http://www.nownys.org/archives/leg_memos/oppose_a00330.html Why blame feminism? Feminism would never attend a discussion about serious issues that men face purely to disrupt it, right? Certainly feminism allows all voices to be heard? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Why blame feminism? Certainly feminism wouldn't…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:07 AM
2

Feminism is inherently anti-male. Feminism is a hate movement: Why blame feminism? I mean it's not like they fought to keep children away from their fathers, even though mothers would have had equal custody? http://www.nownys.org/archives/leg_memos/oppose_a00330.html Why blame feminism? Feminism would never attend a discussion about serious issues that men face purely to disrupt it, right? Certainly feminism allows all voices to be heard? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4euzB0CAsCg Why blame fem…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:05 AM
1

This has been going on for millennia (men allowed to cheat on their wives, but not the opposite, etc) I'd love to see your citation for this. As for the original question: Generally Speaking - Men put in more effort in exchange for sex. Imagine the following scenario: A campus has a bustling courtyard. An attractive woman walks into the courtyard and shouts "Anyone who wants to have sex with me can do so", how many phone calls do you think she receives? Now imagine a man doing the same, do you t…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:57 AM
1

Innocent until proven guilty. Her story has no merit unless she can prove it.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:43 AM
1

Anyways I've said already and I fucking meant it - I'm through with you. If you'd like to continue to cover up those who destroyed evidence in the name of your own personal prejudice then feel free to do so. I'll continue being upset by the people who destroy evidence rather than the folks who point out such corruption, you do you though.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:29 PM
1

But thanks for the ad-homs and trying to strong-arm me into agreeing with you. It's the most satisfying indication of defeat on your part. You're just so incredibly fucking dense, I can't help but point out the fact that you have no fucking argument. You are making a moral argument, based on YOUR OWN MORALS and your own prejudice against a person. If you had any dick or spine at all you'd be angry at the people who supposedly destroyed evidence rather than the person who acknowledged that fact.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:26 PM
1

That's what the SS soldiers claimed: "I was only following orders" :) But a moral person would object and resign. Again, your morals. You are a nobody, your morals do not apply to the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:25 PM
1

Sure I do. The fact that she thought he probably was guilty, yet didn't resign, means she is corrupt. I'm going to say this to you one more time: Innocent until proven guilty you dumb fuck. It is not her place or the place of a moron like you to dictate guilt. Wow you sure go to great lengths to defend a baby raper, eh? I would say the same to you, you want to shift the blame onto the person who pointed out BAD EVIDENCE rather than the people who destroyed it. Seems to me you're trying to cover …
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:24 PM
1

Only as an amoral person. As a moral person, she does have an obligation to refuse. According to YOUR morals.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 03:22 PM
1

Don't need one. You ain't put a dent in mine, yet. You don't have one other than "I hate her, and she defended someone (I.E. Her job) she didn't exercise her RIGHT to choose not to represent him, despite the fact that she has NO OBLIGATION." You're a narcissist, you think your OPINION (because you have no evidence or backing claim)that she should have refused is some sort of binding moral code.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 12:59 PM
1

The law necessitates that And she facilitated it. She did her job, you've got nothing on her for this. Accept it.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 12:56 PM
1

Feminist crybaby bitchiness rears it's head again I'm not a feminist, but labeling people in order to make them oppositional is a common tactic of theirs. You're a hypocrite, and an imbecile. I'm finished with you, you may limp back into whatever sad existence you live.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 12:56 PM
0

It deprives him of no rights, it merely suggests that the right thing to do would be to stand down. The right thing to do would be give him the best defense possible, if his case is bad then his case will fail. The evidence decides, not ignorant people like you.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:50 AM
1

Your entire retarded argument is that the only option with integrity is to not take the case. You're a piece of shit, we get it. I've read many of your other posts, this much is clear. Just because YOU think someone is guilty does not mean they are. What you're doing is nothing more than trial by public opinion, you deprive people of their legal options by being an ignorant little cunt. People like you are the reason people get lynched - you deem them guilty before the trial even starts. What ab…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:48 AM
1

Your entire argument is: "He shouldn't have a good lawyer, or a layer of his choosing" Her INTEGRITY was what allowed her to take a case few others would be willing to take. Just because you are an ass doesn't mean everyone is. You have no other argument.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:32 AM
1

Again, irrelevant. Attorneys turn down cases all the time #DERP Attorneys do a lot of things, some even hide evidence. Doesn't make it ideal nor acceptable. She has the RIGHT to turn it down, not the obligation.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:56 AM
1

Hilary is a liar and a sexist. But in this case, she did her duty. Unlike you I'm not an insufferable cunt and I can admit that she did so. You're so salty that you can't admit that she did one thing right, despite the fact that she violated no rules or regulations of any kind.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:54 AM
1

So did Charles Manson. But not everyone will take his case. So did OJ. But only an unscrupulous attorney would (and did) defend him. And those who refuse to take his case FORCE him to use an attorney of lower quality. Those people are undermining justice, they're letting their biases (or lack of desire to lose a case) prevent someone from getting good representation, in the process of doing so they FORCE someone else to do it. Goalpost moving. This has nothing to do with his legal rights and you…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:53 AM
1

Again, irrelevant. Attorneys turn down cases all the time Somebody HAS to represent them. If she didn't someone would be forced too, representation is guaranteed. Would you hate the person the state chose to represent him as well? She could have resigned once she knew there was inadvertent evidence tampering. She was doing her job, her job was to defend him, she EXPOSED the evidence tampering as part of her job. You can see inside her skull and know this? Wow! 1) She believed he was guilty 2) Sh…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:49 AM
0

So, essentially your entire argument is: 1) You hate her because she defended someone - fulfilling their legal right to be defended. She did this in spite of the fact that she could fail and that it wasn't a case likely to earn her much repute i.e. She did a job few would want to. 2) She - in accordance with typical legal practices - defended her client by analyzing the veracity of all evidence, including bringing in professionals. 3) She fulfilled her role without letting her personal biases in…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:03 PM
0

The relevancy comes from pointing out your nonsense.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:57 PM
1

Apparently she feels everybody has the right to representation. Many shitty lawyers will refuse to take a case if they think they can't win. She didn't. And your point is? She fulfilled her duties and in no way violated the law. If you want to be salty then be salty at the prosecutors and the people who handled the case. Just because YOU don't think someone deserves their - LEGAL RIGHT - to a defense doesn't mean everyone agrees with you.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:56 PM
0

The citation is the video itself, she discusses going to NY and tracking down a professional in order to expose flaws in the evidence and the way it was handled. It was literally YOUR point. It's not her job to fight for the accuser, it was her job to fight for the defendant - which she very clearly did as he is not in prison.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:18 PM
1

Good for you. They can make it non-discriminatory and you can stand at the back of the line. Your choice is not ours, if you have a death wish then so be it.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:23 AM
1

If women can't protect themselves that's their own goddamned problem.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:21 AM
0

Here's the deal: Nobody gives a flying fuck about you or your opinions. You wanna stay behind and get shot to death? Cool. Go for it. Let the rest of us do as we please.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:19 AM
2

I don't know if those men were willing to wait, but they deserve respect for doing it anyways. I would rather not be dead, respect means shit if you're dead.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:17 AM
15

Am I the only one who thinks 25 years for a 16 year old who committed a non-violent crime is a bit much?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:06 AM
0

Sidenote: Is the downvoting REALLY necessary?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:41 PM
1

Sorry the intention wasn't to be unnecessarily aggressive, I have a hard time controlling tone online. Never seems to read the way I think it does. We disagree with you on that. Usage of the word 'we' is ambiguous and misleading, it plays much like typical goal post moving. It is simply more accurate to avoid using generalizations as much as possible. It's pretty safe to say "We are against discrimination". Are there some sexists in the movement? Sure. That's why we need to call them out. Your p…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:32 PM
0

The jury and judge didn't make a conclusion based on the evidence, so your point is irrelevant. No, they made a conclusion based on incomplete evidence, in such a case it's a mistrial. The plea bargain went through because the evidence was missing, that's not HER fault, it's the fault of the crime lab. She was a defense attorney, she did all she could to point out flaws in the evidence. She did her job. She did not hide evidence, she did not destroy evidence. You want to go after someone, go aft…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:15 PM
1

That's not totally true. We have gynocentrism... Firstly, you may speak for yourself. There is no "We" here unless you've done some sort of poll. Here's the only definition of Gynocentrism I could find: Gynocentrism: An ideological focus on females, and issues affecting them, possibly to the detriment of non-females. (Contrast with androcentrism.) https://www.wordnik.com/words/gynocentrism First make note of the fact that it's in the Wiktionary rather than a traditional dictionary. Then note the…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 06:46 PM
3

How many of you guys/girls here actually hate women/think that you are better than women? Some strongly worded language right here. Is there some degree of people within the MRM that hates women? Of course. Is there some degree of people within the general population that hates women, I'm sure there is. Is there some degree of people within the feminist movement that hate men, that's definitely clear. Is there some degree of people within the general population that hates men, I'm sure there is.…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:58 PM
0

She CAN'T know he was guilty unless she was there. She was coming to a personal conclusion based on the evidence she saw. That doesn't mean she gets to determine guilt. She left it up to the jury and judge to decide, which was the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:04 PM
1

I loathe Hilary Clinton. She is a terrible, evil, liar of a person. But she was right to defend her client without letting her own feelings get in the way. It is not the place of an attorney to deem someone guilty, that is for judge and jury.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:44 PM
1

That child though - holy shit.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:23 PM
2

Honestly, it needed to happen. Denise was the only doctor, she brought Carl back from a bullet through the eye (side note: OF COURSE SHE DIDN'T SURVIVE, SHE WAS THE ONLY DOCTOR), and the group seemed near immortal after the raid they just performed. Losing a doctor in a post apocalyptic scenario? Deadly. Now the action in the show will have a lot more tension.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:22 PM
4

She should be buried under the prison. She got away with it because she is a woman, women get off with crimes far too easily.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:20 PM
1

I just wish the presidential election wasn't a joke. I feel like my country is a three ring circus.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:51 AM
1

Even Hilary would be better, God help us all. No, she is a calculated and hateful person. Trump is a fool. I'd rather have a fool than a bigot.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:53 PM
3

In summary: Feminist walks into the MensRights subreddit with their unproven and nonsensical patriarchy theory and expects that people won't point out that their theory is full of holes. That or we have a serious incidence of Poe's law. Edited for clarity.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:37 PM
1

A page ripe with feminist trite. No evidence no real logic just somebody's personal ramblings. What is noteworthy here?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:24 PM
1

The problem is when you say "I wonder what women are disadvantaged in" far too often you'll realize men have it worse. (I.e. Women want abortions while men who aren't fathers are forced to pay exorbitant amounts). The rest of the time you'll find that the issue was caused by women (Such as Tubal Ligation in which case doctor hesitance is often caused by women suing them later when they "Change their mind". Men also have a hard time getting vasectomies when Married though for different reasons).
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:13 PM
1

Explain IQ differences then? At the bottom of the sub a man gave link saying that male to female ratio beyond 170 pts is 30:1 So men do not have extra brains? There is a bell curve that looks like this. There are more male geniuses for the same reason there are more male fools. Women tend toward the center. https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-ba7c85e19585f68031d863702588d951?convert_to_webp=true
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:10 PM
1

1) We are physically weak ( yes! It's a disadvantage) That's your problem, not the problem of men. No amount of Feminism or any "rights" movement will help you there. 2) We bleed five days That's your problem, not the problem of men. No amount of Feminism or any "rights" movement will help you there. 3) We undergo painful beauty treatments. That's your choice, don't like them? Don't do it. Welcome to the western world. 4) We maybe intellectually inferior cause men have the privilege with born wi…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:06 PM
1

Women don't need tampons, tampons are their preferred method. Women need tampons no more than I need a T-bone steak for every meal. Women have lived without tampons for a very long time, my advice? They call it "On the rag" for a reason. Regrettably this means I will have to continue on without my steak.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:46 PM
1

All women have need of sanitary products. The two aren't 1:1 comparable. Some women do - in fact - not menstruate. Menopause and other medical conditions are one such example. Women do not need tampons, tampons are their preferred sanitary method. Women have lived without tampons for a very long time. It would be the equivalent of me saying I NEED FILET MIGNON. I don't. Filet Mignon is OPTIONAL what I NEED is food.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:43 PM
0

Whether or not women should be using tamppons is kind of a separate question here. Tampons are a regularly-used thing in our society, and more to the point, their use (or pads at least) is expected. Even if they're more for the benefit of others than the health of the user, they're still necessary by today's standards. Women have lived without tampons for a very long time, they can continue to do so. Condoms are only necessary if you're having sex. I could see arguments to make them free as well…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:40 PM
1

Because men have a right to privacy as well and because women are not the responsibility of men?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:58 AM
1

http://www.shewee.com/ If women want to urinate faster that is their problem not mine and not men's. Women are the responsibility of no one but women.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:57 AM
1

Woman take longer to pee. Not my fucking problem. They deserve no additional space, stop dawdling in the restroom. Women deserve no additional provacy than men. Make both unisex or neither. Laws need to be passed to mandate bathroms present for both Genders.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:55 PM
1

Do not call others "Boy" and expect to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:52 PM
1

Its unequal and unfair. I am not a woman I do not give a damn how long they take to use the restroom women deserve no more privacy and space than men. Do not excuse blatant discrimination.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:51 PM
1

Unacceptable. Sexist feminist thinking in action.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:49 PM
1

Demand sources do not take her word for truth. Collect massive amounts of your own evidence through recent times (e.g. What if she asks about domestic abuse law in the 1700s? Its always good to have a history of things in mind as feminists usually lean on the alleged action of past feminism). Eventually she will be caught performing circular reasoning in which case she will concede or you can regard her as a lost cause.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:26 PM
1

BTW do me a favor and google "Feminists attack" and "Feminists disrupt" videos and explain to me how you think feminists blowing noisemakers, pulling firealarms, and attacking peaceful protestors is doing anything constructive.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:18 PM
1

You're functionally retarded. RotK literally despises the MRM, it'd be the equivelant of calling Hilary Clinton an MRA.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:16 PM
3

I know. Everytime someone mentions the RoK I try to make sure I post that. A simple google should lead them to where RoK says it.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:16 AM
1

How the fuck does he not even read their damn page before claiming they represent the MRM?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:57 AM
7

RoK are not for the MRM, they are quite openly opposed to it. They do not like us and (I can speak only on the general perception I have here) we do not like them.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:52 AM
1

This was beautiful. Not sure if this is the right subreddit. But great none the less.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:44 PM
2

There's no such thing as a soul. A fertilized egg is a phase of human life as is adulthood and prepubescence, it is not for you to decide the morality of every situation. Rape is a far cry from the worst thing that can happen to a person but it's not equivalent to someone just hitting you.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 12:23 AM
1

I would ask the same of you, can you not read?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:56 AM
1

God no! Jokes people don't like! I highly guarantee there's another agenda here.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:12 AM
1

A statement, especially one intended to deceive, that omits some of the facts necessary for a full description or account. i.e. "Women earn less than men". You're really anal-retentive about your word play. A half-truth is nothing more than a lie that has some basis in truth. In other words. Misleading is a broad category of using information to misdirect others. (Generally maliciously). Lies are a subcategory in which information is blatantly wrong. Half-truths are a subcategory of lies based o…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:11 AM
2

There is no "medical care" when it comes to most STDs you're just stuck with them. As far as abortion it isn't something that you just do, it affects people mentally.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:52 AM
1

OHHHHHH!!!! So you're mad that I gave TYT any positive attention whatsoever. You want the /u/mensrights and the MRM to be an echo chamber where people are accepted and rejected based on who they are instead of what they say. So since TYT's has stated false things things that were pro-Feminist and anti-MRA in the past, you now want them in the out-group that has nothing good said about them ever. Hmmm...I can think of another group that operates like that. Can you? Looks like someone is emotional…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:50 AM
2

The actions of a major national goal inherently reflect the movement. If the majority did not support their actions they would do something other than pay dues.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:43 AM
2

The father should have rights. The courts will not protect him, feminists and the women who support them fought against default shared parenting. Men are treated as nothing more than ATMs, their children are lied to and their fathers demonized. What connection can you have to someone who has been brainwashed to believe men are bad?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:40 PM
1

Any idiot on welfare can give birth to 8+ children, it's not hard.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:36 PM
4

I disagree entirely, rape is a more serious crime than assault and comes with it's own repercussions especially should pregnancy or STIs be brought into the equation.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:23 PM
1

I love how you downvoted me on every comment. Right, I'm the reason your posts have as much as -10 karma. It's nothing to do with your dense attitude. I never pandered to anything Just keep telling yourself that. Maybe if you repeat it enough you'll feel like it's true. I also want to point out how you went from talking about how the men making more than women stat was factually inaccurate said by bigots You left out "For the same work". to me somehow pandering to half-truths, even though I spea…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 08:20 PM
1

Why does this feel more racist than sexist?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:44 PM
1

Both types of feminist are unacceptable.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:37 PM
2

The effects of the movement are highly anti-male. When you have an entire organization fight against equal parenting, then your movement might be bigoted.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:36 PM
1

It's called "Flailing in fear of being exposed".
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:34 PM
1

I'm adorable. But that's besides the point, the fact that you're so willing to pander to half-truths and weak admittance of wrong doing is troubling.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:25 PM
1

When you look at people like Bernie Sanders, it's hard to make the case that the guy is a bigot. Bernie Sanders reads what is put in front of him, were he to upset the feminists (i.e. Bigots) he'd have no chance of winning. He may not be a bigot himself but he spouts known false information. Yes, you are. You take a stance that is correct and then you exaggerate it to the point where it is no longer correct. For instance, you aren't happy saying that a factually accurate statement is misleading,…
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:18 PM
1

I was going to say the same thing about your astounding ignorance not to mention your lack of understanding regarding the English language.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:14 PM
1

I was referring to Cenk, the qualification of "Feminist" should've given that away. If you took more than 5 seconds to read a post and contemplate what it means you'd have recognized it. Cenk calls it "pandering" and "complicated" but says it's okay because it's a "Progressive position"
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:13 PM
1

Because what we're aiming for in the MRM is allowing feminists to dodge bullets by saying "It's misleading but okay". Next up "It might result in some innocent men being accused of rape, but it's okay". When do we stop excusing their half baked attempts at excusing themselves? They need to admit they are wrong, they need to admit that the statistic is intentionally created to misconstrue fact and to hide the reality.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:00 PM
1

You are doing nothing more than trying to hide the fact that what they are doing is both intentional and malicious. It's the feminist political machine in action and you'll just sit and watch.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:56 PM
1

Nothing is being downplayed here. They stated the well known false hood that women earn less than men for the same work. This is a lie. That very same lie is emblazoned on the whitehouse website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/equal-pay/career They pass it off as "Unfairness" knowing full well that it is anything but. You came in here with wordplay (Let me define that for you as well). Witty or clever verbal exchange; repartee. You took a lie (A subcategory of misleading in which they intentionally …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:54 PM
3

Yeah, let's agree to disagree. Rapists should be locked away in prison for a very very very very long time, there's no other acceptable outcome.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:47 PM
1

It's not a false statement or an untruth to claim that men make more than women as groups. To claim that it is between men and women working the same jobs (Which they do, constantly) is a lie. That's why it's misleading. That's why it's a bold faced lie. You sound like a Feminist now using emotionalism to try and get your way. And you sound like someone who endorses lies and ignorance. There is no acceptable amount of falsehood, they either tell the truth or their exposed for what they are. Why …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:45 PM
1

It's a pretty worthless statistic without the context of why that is the way it is, and when you get the context, you realize it's not a problem. It's intentionally used to create even more bigotry. I won't let some nitwit like you use wordplay to downplay the ignorance behind it.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:26 PM
1

You have no idea what a lie is: a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; It has been proven false countless times, the people saying it know it is false and say it intentionally despite it's falsehood. It is a lie, a bigoted lie.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:24 PM
0

Interesting how birth isn't "the woman's consequences" for not using the FREE birth control available.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:23 PM
0

She has the choice to carry the baby to term or not. He should have the choice to forgo it as well, i.e. Financial Abortion. It's her choice, her consequences. If the man has no rights he should have no responsibilities.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:21 PM
1

It's not "misleading" it is an intention lie, it is malicious and it's bigoted.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:16 PM
3

Men already get nothing from marriage, whats less than nothing?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:10 PM
1

Even when a place FOR MALE VICTIMS is created on it's own they swoop in and take it. "Oh hey the white house is going to help out minority boys! Finally!" NOPE It all goes to minority girls who are not nearly as affected.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:05 PM
2

Don't use the L word it'll get you in trouble!
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:03 PM
1

I mean just look at Hilary Clinton.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:01 PM
3

You do realize that a lot of people commit suicide over it right? Maybe you think it's not a big deal but for most people it is.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:46 PM
0

i.e. The scientific definition? Or is it that my definition isn't wispy and based on delusion? I guess the fact that SEX DETERMINING REGION Y exists is just a mere fantasy. Edit: I would ask what your definition of the sexes is but I'm afraid I'll die laughing at the twisted delusion you'll give me.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:19 PM
2

that did what they set out to do. They did nothing but imbalance society. It was WWII not feminism that got women into the workforce. Had it not been for feminism we'd have nowhere near the number of bigoted laws we have now.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:17 PM
3

It's in the nature of their movement. Their patriarchal ideology demands hate.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:15 PM
4

This just in sexual preferences now a crime. More at 11.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:10 PM
-1

Hilary Clinton thinks we should believe rape accusers...she's the presidential elect and doesn't know how the presumption of innocence works.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:08 PM
3

So you would let yourself get anally raped then?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:06 PM
1

It's a joke. Fucked up? Yes. But a joke non-the-less. I bet the same people would laugh at a joke with a woman as the butt of the joke.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:06 PM
0

"I am a woman" while not being a woman. Is a false belief.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:49 PM
0

The trans person is delusional as well.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:05 PM
0

Okay, then here's my question: in what situation is treating that person as male useful? At what point is demanding someone treat you as something you aren't acceptable? Why should the aforementioned peter pan not be treated as peter pan?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:37 PM
1

You're laughable.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:34 PM
5

They earn less than men. Much like you should not expect money you did not earn neither should women.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:15 AM
1

Well, they didn't like it one bit. And now they work. Women mostly work part time and when they do work they work significantly less hours. Add to that the fact that polls have shown women are less happy than ever before and you start seeing a more clear picture. The woman's liberation movement did nothing but cause issues, I fully understand being bored, but come the fuck on? "Oppressed" by boredom? FUCKING REALLY?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:14 AM
1

I'm not crusading anyone. I'm just trying to clarify that nobody has anything against you or against circumcision of those who wish to undergo it. You were not circumcised as a child incapable of consent therefore you do not fall under MGM. There are two different issues here and you're taking offense to anyone who is against MGM just because you found circumcision to be medically necessary at a time you could consent to it. (Note the appropriate use of MGM and Circumcision there).
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:12 AM
1

Right, you mean how I said the exact opposite? Like any body part there may be times where it causes trouble (i.e. A bad liver) dictating it's removal. You're incredibly defensive for no reason. I was merely stating that the foreskin serves a purpose (Which it does) and that it has thousands of nerve endings (Which it does).
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:11 AM
1

WWII Got women into the workforce not women's lib. Prior to entering the workforce they were still more than free to pursue social lives outside the home. If your definition of oppression is boredom you have a really weak definition of oppression. I wish I could be oppressed enough to have to do no work, have all my meals provided to me for free, be given shelter and protection regardless of my lack of output. Technology is what reduced housework granting women the ability to complete more in a …
/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:03 AM
1

Yeah, I thought I was being obvious with the "Handful of people" and "Tremendous cost and inconvenience" bits but sarcasm doesn't travel well on the internet.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:38 PM
-2

Rarity does matter. Rarity shows that it does not affect normal males/females. Since it isn't indicative of a normal healthy body it's essentially irrelevant. The fact of the matter remains: They are suffering from mutated genetics, this does not change their sex. Pointing to a highly uncommon incidence of a man being from a family that suffered from all sorts of debilitating conditions such as infertility and mosaicism doesn't in any way change the definition of sex. He's still a highly mutated…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:35 PM
2

I would certainly put a large amount of money on that.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:25 PM
-2

Rare, highly mutated males. Edit: Note that work "remarkable". This isn't common. He actually suffers from mosaicism. He is technically a hermaphrodite of sorts. Edit on why they are hermaphroditic: ambiguous genitalia and infertility in both phenotypic males and females
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:36 PM
1

I would agree with this and I believe I've stated essentially the same thing elsewhere in this thread. edit: But women's roles don't get them killed, a life is a heavy price to pay.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:35 PM
1

You did realize that was sarcasm right?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:34 PM
-2

To summarize: I said they are sick and they will never be able to change their sex unless they change their chromosomes. Your response was: They are sick.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:33 PM
-2

All I stated is that it's a mental illness. You have done nothing but confirm that. I stated: Your sex is dictated by your chromosomes. FACT There is a reason they call it SRY. It stands for Sex Determining Region Y Your chromosomes dictate your hormonal makeup. FACT I hope I don't have to explain this one to you, but the fact that men have more testosterone than women isn't just luck. If you have a healthy body when compared to the typical human and you feel something is wrong with it then you …
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:31 PM
2

Don't forget the affirmative action.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:21 PM
1

This is a well known phenomenon. Karen Straughan has commented on it as well. Essentially the more totalitarian the state or harsher the conditions the more likely women are to choose jobs that they don't desire (i.e. Food/Shelter over easy/ideal career life).
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:19 PM
2

The feminist approach would be to draft mostly women until war deaths reach parity. Then keep drafting women, because wait? We're supposed to use affirmative action until parity?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:14 PM
2

I argue with Claire McCaskill all the time, she brushes me off. I never vote for her and yet she stays in office. I just don't know if this whole voting thing is working right.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:05 PM
1

Normally she's pretty solid, but every once in a while you get a weird gem out of her.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:03 PM
1

In other words "YEAH! STUPID CHEERLEADERS!"
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:02 PM
1

Completely unrelated to the article, but on the topic of bathrooms: Please stop writing on the damn walls
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:28 PM
1

I don't want our bathrooms to smell like a sushi restaurant either.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:25 PM
1

It's mostly women I'm sure. A woman goes into the Men's restroom? No big deal. Man in the woman's restroom? He's probably going to be talking to the police.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:24 PM
1

Wow way to dismiss a handful of the population just because of the tremendous cost and inconvenience imposed on the majority.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:23 PM
1

"I'm not disabled but I identify as disabled". How would that go?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:21 PM
1

I'm glad I'm not the only one that caught that.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:18 PM
-3

A heavily mutated woman is still a woman. A heavily mutated man is still a man. You do not stop becoming a woman if they rig you up with a penis. Someone without 2 X chromosomes giving birth is extremely unlikely (and dangerous) so I highly doubt any such case has occurred but even if it has that does not change the fact that they are suffering from genetic mutation. In such a case their body has a corrupted genetic makeup rendering unlike normal bodies of their sex. This is not the case of tran…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:45 PM
1

That flap of skin has thousands of nerve endings, and like the eyelids protect your eyes that flap of skin protects your glans. The foreskin is a healthy part of the male body. Like any body part there may be times where it causes trouble (i.e. A bad liver) dictating it's removal. However, doing so when no cause has presented itself and when the patient is incapable of consent is nothing short of mutilation. Long story short: YOU underwent a necessary medical procedure (Though most such cases ar…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:40 PM
1

Routine Infant Circumcision is mutilation. It is also the most common form of circumcision performed. Yes we get that it can be done on adults too, but it's your body so you can do what you want with it what adults do to their own body is irrelevant, nobody gives a damn the only people we're talking about is children, this entire thread and every thread has been about the circumcision of innocent children.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:33 PM
1

The people in the MRM are against Routine Infant Circumcision not against the circumcision of adults. If you're an adult and you want to cut your arm off then I don't give a damn (Just don't claim it on insurance). If you're an adult and you want yourself circumcised (maybe you're jewish, maybe you're not it doesn't matter) then go for it. But the fact that at any point it is performed on innocent, defenseless, completely healthy children is barbaric and yes it is in fact mutilation in said case…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:30 PM
1

It really annoys me when people regard circumcision as mutilation and turn it into a pity case. Their body is permanently altered without their consent. Add to that the potential loss of life and of the penis/glans for a completely pointless surgery and you do in fact get mutilation.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:27 PM
1

Why didn't you just link to Janice Fiamengo's video instead of uploading it?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:15 PM
2

In addition to my prior post I'll add this story: http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/woman-raised-lesbian-couple-i-ached-every-day-dad At the end of the day I really don't think anything is exactly the same as your biological parents. As an adopted child, I'm well aware of how dreadful my biological parents were/are and how amazingly well off I am thanks to the care given to me by my adoptive parents, but there were times where no matter how great they were that I wanted nothing more …
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:13 PM
1

Think about the counter position: Child does not get adopted and left in foster care. As a person who has witnessed the foster care system in America I can assure you gay parents are the better deal.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:09 PM
1

Damn straight.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:03 PM
1

Yep these are our politicians. Meanwhile they can't tell the difference between a flaccid penis and an unborn child. If a man takes Viagra no one is hurt. If a woman get's an abortion there is ethical concern for the child.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:57 PM
2

Sophia Vergara didn't mind standing on a rotating pedestal but the feminists still screamed like harpies about it.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:54 PM
1

Hilary Clinton makes me dislike my country so much.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:50 PM
1

Simple. Put women in combat on their own. Next time we have a draft just use some of that "Affirmative Action" to throw women at combat until the war deaths are even. At that point you can go to a 50/50 split with male/female units.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:49 PM
1

Men suffer the majority of violence, especially at night.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:46 PM
-2

The only difference between a post-op trans person and someone who was born that gender is that the trans person is sterile. Which is actually something people are still trying to find workarounds for. Their DNA remains the same. So long as they have a Y chromosome they are male. Except they are. The only difference is how much of those hormones your body generates naturally. The hormones used are entirely human sex hormones. This behavior is dictated by your chromosomes. Much like how gluing fu…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:39 PM
-2

A woman is any human being with no Y chromosomes.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:32 PM
-2

A person lacking a limb is still a person. It is the Y chromosome that determines sex.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:31 PM
-1

It is indefeasible to me to consider transgenderism anything other than a mental illness. It is a condition in which a person believes they are something other than the sex of the body they reside in. Regardless of how healthy or normal their body may be their mind believes otherwise. That is a hallmark of mental illness.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:26 PM
1

I don't viciously attack him, but boy does he cause a lot of problems some times. He does attract a lot of attention for the MRM but some times it isn't done in a constructive or ideal way.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:23 PM
1

There is no such thing as mutual oppression. In order for you to have oppression you must have an opposing/controlling power. A quick google for the definition of oppression brought up: "The act of oppressing; arbitrary and cruel exercise of power". It is ludicrous to suggest that both men and women were oppressed, put simply who would the oppressors be? You might suggest that "Gender roles" were oppressive, but that would mean they were arbitrary and cruel. A quick google for the definition of …
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:21 PM
1

And do you think at any point in history women's roles were anywhere near as bad as the roles men were given?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:01 PM
1

You have no idea what oppression means. "The act of oppressing; arbitrary and cruel exercise of power" Women were only denied rights in a time when work was hard/dangerous. It was neither arbitrary nor cruel. Technology is what liberated women, The "Womens lib" movement had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 12:00 PM
1

And women will get away with not having to pay as men have.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:19 AM
5

The men who were drafted in WW1 and WW2 as well as the Vietnam war weren't always even allowed to vote. Conscription age was 18 but voting age was as high as 21. See the 26th amendment for more information.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:18 AM
9

Don't forget the affirmative action! Time to get women to 50% of all combat deaths. After all the feminist methodology get's used when it benefits them right?
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:17 AM
2

First of all, they say MRAs oppose marital rape laws, because the contract of marriage should include indefinite consent. I've never heard anything so stupid in my entire life. Second, they also say MRAs oppose abortion laws, in that men should have a say on abortion. For example, if a woman is pregnant and the man doesn't want the child, he should be able to get her to have an abortion against her will. Again, bullshit. Many of us advocate for the right for men to financially abort the child (i…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:16 AM
2

Just because the cancer isn't new doesn't mean we shouldn't try to treat it.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:57 PM
1

I think you might have a possible point, but I think you are also be in very weak territory. Missouri has a history of racism (to my understanding) and the students involved may have completely valid complaints. From up here in Canada, I have zero understanding of their complaints or experience. Regardless of the perceived racial situation, the methods, the actions, and the groups involved are all terrifying. So your argument is the "they came for the jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't …
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:29 AM
2

Feminist and groups and women from Stephen's college are joining them. I respect your disagreement but I fear waiting on this will put us in a dangerous position surrounded by hate on all sides.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:00 AM
0

I've talked to the protestors several times, men are next. They're the same "Men are oppressors" group and if they don't stop now Men will be the next target.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:05 AM
4

The goal is to protect innocent young boys from having their genitals cut without their permission. Any form of concession indicates you have not reached your goal. Circumcision should only be performed on willing adults.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 02:24 PM
7

Next to suicide rates it is what upsets me most.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 02:23 PM
1

Anything being done as a result of religion is generally ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:22 AM
1

Abortion is not a right, it is morally grey. Many women oppose abortion as well. There is more than one individual evolved. Abortion revolves around "Is the child alive" which is something we do not have the answer to. Under typical practice we should prioritize the rights of the child over the right of an adult.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 08:51 AM
1

Abortion is not a right. It is a moral grey area. There is more than one individual involved.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 08:48 AM
1

Ditto.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:52 AM
2

Sorry kiddo you needed 26 knives in the body to be "graphic" violence, I count only 25.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:46 AM
1

Holy shit what a fucked up site. I know now why people say stay away from 4chan.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:43 AM
1

Wow. Rare to see a comment deleted.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:33 AM
1

Exactly. At the very most you are helping to support a movement that is filled with ideologically fueled hatred (After all your subreddit will act as a "positive" face of feminism while ignoring the ugly truth behind the politics) by performing PR for them. At the very least you get reviled by feminists, reviled by non-feminists, and you fade into obscurity. Your "Respectable" feminist subreddit will gain zero political standing (leaving it completely irrelevant in terms of mainstream feminism) …
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:31 AM
1

My roommate is one such person.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:15 PM
1

Reminds me of a sarcastic remark I made on facebook. It got taken the wrong way and ended up in a huge argument, I returned a few hours later to see the aftermath and apologized, but countless others who responded were still fighting with the person I responded to sarcastically. I don't think that such activity is healthy for a movement though. Unleashing the mongol hordes just seem to happen.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:35 AM
1

Like I said been there, done that. If I had stated myself clearly in my original post WHY I wanted to down vote the post so bad it likely wouldn't have ended up in such drama. Everything makes sense after the fact, I know my intentions when I post and I think that's enough until it goes in a direction I don't intend it to.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:33 AM
1

Language has meaning, you are not the average reader. The average person conflates redpill/MGTOM/MRM without even questioning the difference. When a person see the word hope they're likely to treat it as what it means. This is a forum about activism, anger is understandable but if we aren't careful about our words they will come back to bite us in our ass.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:26 AM
1

Alright, I get where you are coming from, but just due to my own principles, I don't want to change my behaviour for fear of the feminists (or whoever else might be watching). I fully understand, and policing speech is a dangerous road. I think of it kind of like being under constant arrest ". Anything you say can and will be used against you". I just don't want to be unable to get people to listen because they took something said out of anger and applied it in a different context (which happens…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:24 AM
1

This pedantic nit-picking really makes you look smart. That's not the goal, the goal is to show you what the average person is going to think when they read your post. I've done it before, and it backfires. If I could go back and bury my stupid posts in down votes I would. It just makes us look bad, we have every right to be pissed about this, but isn't getting it fixed most important? It's incredibly hard to get people to listen if they read a post and think we advocate violence. I KNOW you wer…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:57 AM
1

This is truly unbelievable that people are spending this much time talk about how offended they are by what I said compared to actually discussing the topic. I'm not offended. You just make this sub looks like a place that desires rape and violence. We're already heavily politicized we don't need to feed the fire. It's just fucking stupid. You didn't read the definition of hope did you. Hope implies you want/expect fulfillment. I'm not angry because it's offensive I'm angry because people who tr…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:53 AM
1

Ohhh. Gotcha, well thank you lol.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:41 AM
1

You have no fucking idea what hope means do you. "To wish for something with expectation of its fulfillment." - https://www.wordnik.com/words/hope In other words you WANT it to happen.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:39 AM
1

You have no fucking idea what hope means do you. "To wish for something with expectation of its fulfillment." - https://www.wordnik.com/words/hope In other words you WANT it to happen.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:39 AM
1

You can express your anger, call the guy a worthless twat, a douchebag, a fucking monster, a horrible excuse for a human being. Just don't call for violence.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:37 AM
1

Oh, my birthday is in march....so...yeah not sure why that's there.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:01 AM
1

Cake day?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:03 AM
0

Somehow I don't think advocating violence for the sake of violence is a solution. Is raping the judge going to reunite the family? Will it undo the harm the child suffered? Will it investigate the CPS system? No? It's pointless and makes you and this subreddit look awful and hateful.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:54 AM
1

We agree that there is no evidence that sex makes a person a better engineer or teacher. So what purpose do such programs serve? How does trying to get "More women in STEM" help anything? Intel is wasting $300m on this nonsense. We agree that the directly observable "Irish need not apply" types of gender discrimination don't happen. No, we don't. http://delta.tudelft.nl/artikel/ten-leading-ladies/26298 Discrimination happens all the time, it just so happens that men are the target. Once again th…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:52 AM
2

Makes me sad that I can only downvote once.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:11 AM
2

I can assure the Streisand effect activated fully.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:10 AM
3

I occasionally agree with the statements they make, I make it very clear I do not agree with their movement. I call them out when they're wrong, and I call their entire movement out on the damage it causes.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:33 AM
1

LOL. So, your problem isn't with the method. It's that the measuring tools are fairly inaccurate. Other things can be measured more accurately with different tools, therefore discrimination doesn't exist. No. My problem IS with the method, the problem with the method is that it is fundamentally worthless, it accomplishes nothing. Why? Because as I said before a person's genitalia/race HAS NO BEARING on engineering. The method is worthless because the intention behind it is worthless, add to that…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:22 PM
2

If such things were encoded into law, feminists would rack up such a massive bill. With their safe spaces and coddling they'd go broke.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:14 PM
4

The quality of that vaccine is highly questionable. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/07/16/hpv-vaccine-effectiveness.aspx
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:08 PM
10

What a worthless survey. Should be accurately titled "In a survey covering five west European Countries published Wednesday [16 September 2015], two out of three respondents acknowledge that women in general lack an interest a science career." "In descending order, other abilities found wanting were ambition, an interest in the subject, perseverance, and a "rational mindset."" Ambition - It has been highly documented that women in general exhibit a lower ambition in regards to their career [Key …
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:03 PM
2

Sex, age, and race have no bearing on likelihood to commit a crime.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:34 PM
1

"Incentive programs done by private individuals/firms are a different story." In terms of NEEDS yes. Male teachers are not a NEED, we have no NEED of male teachers. We have a NEED of good teachers who care for their students, gender is irrelevant. We have a NEED of good engineers who devote themselves to their work we have NO NEED of female engineers. Gender is irrelevant, getting more of x race/gender into an occupation is functionally worthless.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:11 PM
1

We know gravity exists by it's affects on objects. We know through the application of scientific methods that gravity exists. You have no proof for your claim, you're pulling the feminist tactic of "This is true, because my feelings make it true". When things fall down we know it's gravity at work. Gravity is ALWAYS at work, it has nothing to do with things "Falling". Even something stable on a desk is affected by gravity. Gravity is HIGHLY observational. Google the term "Gravity Waves" for exam…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:09 PM
2

A safe idea.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:39 PM
1

"While there is no blatant discrimination against hiring male teachers for younger students, the gender ratio is so far off that random variance doesn't explain it." Citation needed. If you're going to make claims like "There does exist already a notable amount of gender discrimination. " Give evidence, this isn't feminism, I don't accept what you say as fact simply because you say it.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:32 PM
1

The gender ratio in teaching does not reflect society at large. This reflects gender differences NOT gender discrimination. Unless you have empirical evidence, you have no ground to stand on. What value do men provide in teaching that women do not? Can they teach with their genitalia? None, which is exactly why we don't need quotas to get them into teaching because quotas focus on physical characteristics rather than those important to performing the job. There does exist already a notable amoun…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:29 PM
1

Teaching =/= Engineering. Engineering has role models for women (e.g. Yahoo's CEO), you dont have nationally known teachers. Male teachers provide a role model for young boys in teaching. All that being said we dont need more men in teaching we need positive role models for boys. A male teacher is no better than a female teacher.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:17 PM
1

That's all I was advocating for, I wasn't suggesting some kind of Ministry of Truth scenario. Just that "Not knowing" isn't an excuse, we live in the Information Era, people can know better.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:39 AM
2

People's choices have consequences, saying "Oh I just believed it because a lot of people were saying it" isn't a valid excuse. They have the right to believe whatever they want, but they have to face the consequences for any actions they take. Ignorance =/= Innocence, a lack of being informed doesn't make what you do acceptable. At the end of the day it is their responsibility to make informed decisions. When people believe notably false information we have the responsibility to hold them accou…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:00 AM
1

But you're talking about like if someone goes missing and the cops need to track you down? That's some pretty hard-core shit. More a long the lines of "I'm having death threats left in my voicemail, I recently talked to this person and feel they may be responsible" and then they can investigate. You could even get a cheapo disposable phone. But I'm a very paranoid person myself. I live by the adage "Trust but verify".
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:57 AM
5

We need to start holding people accountable for believing baseless information. People shouldn't hear something and just accept it as fact, if someone acts on baseless information and creates negative consequences they need to be held responsible.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:47 AM
1

As noted in my most recent edit above, it's probably best to maintain anonymity until you can be reasonably assured that this person isn't just someone trying to dox you and harass you for being an MRA (no offense /u/ARedthorn but you understand). Only common sense. With that in mind I'd recommend both of you using a separate skype account, or perhaps google chat video, but only after making a separate gmail address for this purpose. And then not using phone numbers, as that's personally identif…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:44 AM
10

Just thought I should add: Always meet in public places (with people around, well lit) Always let friends and family know where you are and who you're with. Make plans for immediately after your meeting (e.g. "I will get picked up at 3:50PM") so that people know when to begin worrying. Don't give out any of your personal information unless you must (Obviously this can relax overtime to a certain extent). Try and communicate (Preferably via Phone/Text) with the people you meet before you meet the…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:35 AM
1

Understandable, nobody wants trouble in their life.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:31 AM
1

Thanks for letting me know.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:30 AM
2

St. Louis I might be able to work out. I have limited transportation (and I'm presently in Columbia, University of Missouri), if you already have a group we could Skype/Phone/Text-Message until we can get a valid meeting time.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:30 AM
4

He's more concerned about faux wage gap rather than showing love equally to his son. Add to that the fact that he could just disperse wealth to them equally as needed and you have a pretty clear idea of that fact that he has some biases towards his daughter. At the end of the day it's going to look like he loves her more, it's going to have the same effect as loving her more, and it's going to make his son just as miserable as if he loved her more. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, an…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:15 AM
3

Things like this just make me sad.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:37 AM
1

Feminism should be exposed for what it is, providing any false form of endorsement for such a bigoted broken movement would only do us harm.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:34 AM
1

Can't tell if jab at women being weaker than men in general, or if it is sexism towards men.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:23 AM
1

Both fantastic sites.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:06 AM
1

" Women are under represented in programming, and if a private institution wants to get more female programmers this is valid. " Why, what value do women provide in programming that men do not? Can they code utilizing their genitalia? I never thought "Wow, we really need more vaginas to get this product done on time! I'm glad we can undermine meritocracy in order to make it possible!"
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:05 AM
4

Masculinity does not "need redefined". People just need to let people be as masculine/feminine as they want. Masculinity gets it's definitions the the general attributes of men. Trans people are so far from the generality that their statements are fully meaningless. It's quite literally a "Have my cake and eat it too" situation. They want to not be masculine but also call themselves masculine. Masculinity is fine, what needs to end is women/men/society shaming men by attacking their masculinity.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:02 AM
2

Trans people must have some kind of mental/biological issue. This isn't "You don't want to play kickball" this is "You don't feel like you belong in your body". That's just a sign of needing serious mental treatment, barring that (since none is available) the most you can do is live and let live.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:57 AM
6

Why not? Feminists have eliminated the vast majority of male spaces, should we just let the hypocrisy stand? The only way to get them to listen is to get their bigotry applied equally so they too can realize how much it sucks.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:43 AM
3

"PLEASE! SOMEONE! ANYONE! BE A FEMINIST!!!"
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:41 AM
1

Let me know who to call/e-mail/meet and I'll get it done.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:38 AM
1

Central Missouri. I'm limited transportation wise, but I'm sure I could work something out.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter