TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tqbfjotlds Archive

View 0 posts and 587 comments by Tqbfjotlds on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

Or maybe she thought that the judge would have sympathy for her now that she is pregnant and going to be a "mother".
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/16 08:21 PM
8

Not that it should matter, but he did not sit next to her. He sat in the next row aisle seat. There was an empty seat and the aisle between them.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/15 02:32 PM
3

It's more likely due to the traditional indian clothing that the women wear.
/r/RedPillWomen23/12/15 03:42 PM
–

Women are using the excuse of children to rob society blind. They ask for alimony and child support - because they took years off from work to raise kids. They want to be paid by companies because they take time off from work to raise kids. They want higher retirement benefits because they had kids. They want welfare from the government - because kids. Women are literally pimping out their kids to get money from everyone. Its time that women take responsibility for their own decisions.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:17 PM
23

He has been trained all his life that certain behaviour is funny, cute and even expected of him. He is trying to be a good person and make the people around him happy, but the guidebook he uses (in his mind) to demonstrate that to others is screwed up. He needs to have a few strong male friendships and if possible be away from his mother for a period long enough for him to realize that his behaviour is not normal.
/r/RedPillWomen13/12/15 03:35 PM
1

These are violent offenders and worse they are psychotic. They are using violence by proxy to get back at someone, which is worse than just being violent in a fit of rage.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:04 PM
5

It is such a common tactic that women use, that if we were to hold women to that standard, most of them would be in jail. That is why women get off scott free, with men shaking their heads saying - typical woman.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:39 AM
5

It's normal (non-pregnant) women parking in the spots for mother's with young children / pregnant mothers. So yeah, women are the first to grab for things they don't deserve.
/r/MGTOW27/11/15 09:59 PM
–

I think you misunderstood my point - once men everywhere (including prosecutors, the police and judges) stand together and agree that they should ignore women calling men rapists, women will loose the power they have over men. This requires a shift in our cultural mindset and not just a change in laws.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:52 PM
–

At some point men can fix this themselves, by realizing that being called a rapist or misogynist is no big deal. It is what women do to anyone they dislike. Once men, en-masse, start ignoring these labels, women will loose their power. Women know this and that is why they are focussing on brain-washing the younger generation of young boys in school.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:11 PM
1

"Embrace and extinguish" is their strategy. I've found many women who claim to support men's rights only to say, that men should not talk about this topic or that topic. As long as they can insert themselves into a group, they will ultimately control it.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:38 PM
1

Of course, that is exactly what they are going to do. The newspapers will report that "Even the university's Men's Officer does not think these men have a legitamate concern."
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:36 PM
1

Women call the cops on men all the time and even with video evidence the cops don't do anything to the women.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:34 PM
1

The majority of cases where cops are falsely called on someone, are from women who are getting back at men they don't like.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:33 PM
9

The womyn is trying to convey her feels in straight talk. As you might expect, it is a bunch mumbling and rumbling about something that she doesn't understand. She is not really trying to convey her feelings. What she is doing is trying to keep a conversation going so that the listener pays attention to her. The longer she rambles the more attention she gets. The more confusing she sounds, the more the listener will try to make sense of what she is saying.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 08:37 PM
3

For the masculine, they will feel safe and secure when they have the greatest opportunity to produce results, and that comes when they are respected and trusted I don't think that this is accurate. Men feel safe and secure when they are in a group of people who are loyal. Men value loyalty very highly. To be loyal to the goup, men are more than willing to carry their weight and take on responsibility for the betterment of the group. Among a group of men, this is a give and take relationship and …
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/15 05:13 PM
2

The men have been brainwashed when they were boys. They are doing what they think is right and noble - protecting the women and not daring to stand up to them.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 03:36 PM
1

Might be too young.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 03:35 PM
2

but the numbers show that ultimately women need more help. The numbers show that women end up loosing most of the fights with men and that they are the first to run to the authorities to complain. Since society has accepted the notion that "There is never any reason to hit a woman", we refuse to collect objective data on who starts those domestic fights. If you consider that, there is a likelihood that women start most of these physical fights, then no, women don't need more help to protect them…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 03:33 PM
–

That is why the women are targetting young boys. If they brainwash them early, they will not pose a threat to the established gynocentrisism.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:19 PM
–

They are not trying to correct sexism. They are ensuring that the new generation of young men are brainwashed into worshipping women.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:17 PM
4

I don't think women are turning on each other. Women are turning on the "feminist" label, because men have started to stand up against it. Suddenly all women everywhere will be anti-feminist and will claim to be humanist/egalitarian or some new retarded moniker that they come up with. The end game is still the same - it is to deceive men into believing that NAWALT and to keep supporting them. I predict that women will claim that whatever new label they choose to call themselves is not feminist a…
/r/MGTOW25/11/15 02:19 PM
2

and the sad part is that most men will fall for it. That is because women control the upbringing of men as children and young adults. Women get at least 10 - 15 years of male servitude using boys and young men. By the time men figure out that the game is rigged, they have devoted a couple of decades to serving their female overlords.
/r/MGTOW25/11/15 02:10 PM
15

This is why women are desperate to have men join them as feminists. They want to have a scapegoat to blame and say that it was the men all along. I even heard one woman say that feminism was created by men to oppress women.
/r/MGTOW24/11/15 06:46 PM
21

That is their objective. If someone disagrees with them or dares to question feminism - they believe their life should be ruined. Hell hath no fury as a feminist scorned.
/r/PussyPass24/11/15 01:54 PM
6

I'm glad someone finally said it. It is so obvious.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:56 PM
4

"UK feminist campaigners shout "rapist" wherever the men's rights campaigner goes." This is the epitome of false-allegations. Whenever women disagree or dislike a man, the first tactic they resort to is accusing him of someting he has not done or has not said. Levelling false allegations against a man are the defacto modus operandi of feminists and most women.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:25 PM
14

Give a woman an inch and they will take a mile. Women are zen-level experts at this. Don't let them vote or lead? - No problem for them, they will join whatever you are doing and create so many problems that you just give up and give them what they want, just to get rid of their complaining.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/15 03:21 PM
21

They want to be part of a group where boys do all the work and they get to enjoy the fun of going camping and doing all these activities. Why do the girl scouts not take up these fun activities instead? - Because none of the girls want to do the hard work.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/15 03:19 PM
–

Feminists argue that we should not subject either men or women to enslavement by the state; Except when a man offends them in any way. Then feminists argue that men should be thrown into the slammer on merely the whims of a woman. So they are not actually arguing that the injustice is removed from men.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 05:08 AM
1

He will have to pay. He signed the birth certificate and even if he hadn't, the law states that any child born when the mother is married is the responsibility of the husband.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:59 PM
4

Because of the Duluth Model for domestic violence which women enacted in law. It basically states that men are the perpatrators and women are the victims. If there is no video evidence, the woman's word is taken as irrefutible evidence.
/r/MGTOW17/11/15 02:15 PM
1

it's almost like any time I fuck up, no matter how minor, she likes to turn it into a big ordeal. Yes, she likes to do this, because it works. It is her own personal soap-opera. You need to learn to laugh it off or use these things to antagonize her. She wants to see that she cannot get to you. Unfortunately this means that she will constantly test you and you have to deflect her shit tests.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/11/15 12:52 AM
36

Check out the "9/11 Faker" documentary on youtube. A woman pretended to be a 9/11 survivor and even became the head of the survivors group, only to be found out 10 years later that she lied about everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/15 12:38 AM
–

Thanks, that link was helpful. However, it is more ridiculous that she received just probation for clearly malicious assualt. The Daily News Journal reported 23-year-old Michaela Morales received nearly a year of probation, must do 24 hours of community service and pay preacher John McGlone $80 restitution. This is a joke - $80 restitution.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:16 PM
16

When a woman does not get the attention she wants - she turns to attacking you. That way you will suddendly drop everything to clarify to her that you did not intend to offend / mistreat / be rude to her. You start apologizing for any misunderstanding - while she revels in the attention that she is getting.
/r/askTRP09/11/15 03:41 PM
1

The world is too big to go back and start another relationship with your ex. Once you next a girl, never ever look back.
/r/askTRP09/11/15 01:01 AM
4

But the moment you pay them DIRECTLY for the sex, This really is because of the amount you offer for sex. Women don`t want a small sum of money in return for sex. They want to fuck once and be set for life. (effectively how they see marriage). If the price is high enough, they are more than willing to trade money for sex directly.
/r/MGTOW08/11/15 10:11 PM
–

Yes, but the fallout will really affect men only. Women will just move into another society and fuck their way up.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:07 PM
3

Her: Judge, I signed under duress. He made me feel scared. Judge: Ok, throw out that consent form.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:45 PM
–

That's what happens when women take over education - they turn it into gossip, victimhood and fear mongering. Same thing in journalism also - which is now female dominated - news has turned away from facts to sensationalizing gossip.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:59 PM
1

I would hardly call this a sexual revolt. Men are standing up and demanding that they are treated with basic human rights.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 12:07 PM
1

Hey, feminists (actually female feminists) are the ones pulling in the race and minority card in front of everything. Take "women's representation in STEM and IT", women started to say that minorities were discriminated against, just to make their victimhood seem legitimate. Before feminits took this up, did you ever hear of minorities saying that they were discriminated against in STEM and IT?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:18 AM
1

This is alright, as long as men wake up and say the same thing to women when they whine about everything.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:14 PM
2

It's a legitimate need if that was the case and they would direct funds. That's the problem. Women don't want to have money spent on men.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:19 AM
5

That would change the context completely. Right now it looks like she was just sitting in class and was attacked.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/15 11:08 PM
1

Sigh! You seem to fail at reading comprehension 101.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/15 09:27 PM
12

I meant, what is ridiculous, is the notion that teachers cannot discipline children, so the schools have to call the police in to do the same thing. As a society, we need to accept that children sometimes behave badly and need to be disciplined. I grew up in schools where the teachers could punish kids when they misbehaved - and I agree, some kids really deserve it. The reason kids act out so badly nowadays, is that the schools cannot punish kids when they misbehave.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/15 01:46 PM
2

It's the only way Hillary can consolidate the female vote. Women will rally around another women who is being attacked by a man - no matter what the reason. So she has to make her closest competitor look like a bad misogynist.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:38 PM
30

The Boss is constrained by HR. HR is 90% women and the upper management does not want a shitstorm of bad publicity for not acting on a sexual harrasment suit. Isn't this the exact same behaviour that drives false rape accusations on campus or even false domestic violence accusations? Women feel offended by something and think they have the right to accuse someone of another crime, just to make themselves feel like a bigger victim.
/r/MGTOW27/10/15 01:20 PM
1

This is so fucked up. Teachers are not allowed to discipline kids or lay a hand on them. Yet they can call the police to do the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/15 01:15 PM
13

Yup this struck me as bragging. She wants to tell the world how svauve her son is growing up to be.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/15 11:29 PM
1

In fact, especially your family will lie to you - at least the women in your family. You are the ultimate beta for them. They want you to be successful and bring in money and resources to share with the family, but they don't want you to be successful with women, because then they will have to compete for your time and resources.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 04:37 AM
13

Having worked in the industry for decades I can assure you that this practice continues into the workplace.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:31 PM
2

This is not even one of the primary reasons why women hate this field. The large majority of women like work which allows them to interact with people. However, the best developers are people who can sit and think through problems and fine tune algorithms. Women generally do not like working alone, nor do they like work which can be directly measured against their productivity.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:23 PM
1

Exceptions do not make the rule. I've worked in this industry for long enough to notice a pattern. Of the top performers, 5% would be women. So sure there are some women who are awesome. That does not disprove the average generalization.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:09 PM
1

They are not really offering free tuition. They are deferring payment by taking a % of the person's income. Women will soon complain that they will end up paying more if they get a well paying job. Then they will say that men have an advantage because of this.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:06 PM
2

What's wrong with that? Women do not get access to the money that they want. That is the simple problem they see. They want to have the same money and resources as men, of cource, without similar effort.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:01 PM
–

Boys are more sensitive than girls to disadvantage. This is one of the stupidest sentences I have read. One gender is given all sort of advantages and protected from any failures, while the other gender is mocked as being "more sensitive to disadvantage". Yeah, men cannot just get married and get a nice house, a car and someone to provide for them for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:59 PM
8

It's a basic manipulation where you set someone up to disappoint you so you can make them feel guilty and work harder to show "love". This sentence is gold.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/10/15 05:32 PM
–

I suspect it is more likely that women have already obtained every privilege available to them. By dissociating from feminism a woman enjoys all the privileges put in place, while easily escaping the negative perception of feminists. It also allows them to fall back on old traditions when convenient by saying that they are not feminists and society cannot have the same expectations of them as it does for men.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:18 PM
14

The problem here is that the female-dominated teaching environment expects an almost dictator-ship level of compliance. Just like women prefer their "safe-spaces" and their validation echo chambers, they dislike being questioned and challenged in class. Boys learn through experimentation and being independent while girls prefer to do exactly what they are told. The reason the education system is broken, is because female teachers want compliance more than true learning and female students are co…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:45 PM
7

If you also include how boys are exploited for their labour by their families, a more realistic comparitive picture will emerge.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:32 PM
–

Because girls are better than boys?
/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:16 PM
2

Sort of. Feminism wants monogamy to be a one-sided contract. The man pledges his service to the woman for nothing in return.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 07:16 PM
–

Yup, and who defines what is sexist? Girls, of course. So any criticism of girls or holding them accountable for their actions is now sexist behaviour. This is another instance of women asking for (and getting) female supremacy.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:58 PM
2

When women are talking to you - they are always trying to manipulate you to do something for them or provide some sort of benefit to them. 100% of the time. Women never communicate for information purposes. So when a woman starts giving you advice - it is usually to hint at what she would like or to sabotage you so that she can get the upper hand.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 01:44 PM
11

The thing is - they expect men to be genuinely both self-flaggelating and self-sacrificing (on the behalf of women) without any ulterior motive whatsoever. That is the definition of the perfect beta. It's the unicorn women search for. A man who will do anything for her, no matter what she does and of course not expect anything in return.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 01:37 PM
36

You would expect that feminism is about the benefit of women The way I see it, is that women know they need one type of man and want another type of man. They absolutely need betas to keep providing for them and feminism helps them obtain betas, while making sure they do not have to give anything in return. It also allows they to seek out alphas while ensuring the betas are waiting for them at home. Men have a single focus when it comes to women - they look for someone they are sexually attracte…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 01:33 PM
–

The whole point is to prevent someone from being poor. It this is the goal, then remove all child support laws. Women will immediately stop having children out of wed-lock.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:28 AM
17

Believe me, if the law allowed for financial abortion, there would be no fatherless children. Heck, even if "child support" was based on actual expenses for a child rather than a percentage of imputed income, women would not have children out of wed-lock. It isn't a coincidence that fatherlessness becomes rampant when women can get welfare and child support payments mandated by law.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:26 AM
–

Well its really simple - women have at least 16 different methods of contraception and prevention if they do not want a child. They should use them or be responsible for their decisions. And yes, equality does work that way - there are consequences for the rights that women demand. EDIT: oh and by the way - you are equating fatherhood with simply being an ATM for mom. Fatherlessness is caused by mothers who remove the fathers from their child's lives. Just getting the government to force men to …
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:08 PM
–

The mother should. She has decided to carry on with a pregnancy that the father does not want. Women cannot have it both ways - it is either their sole right to decide and then their sole responsibility or it is a shared right which means the father has reproductive and paternity rights also. It's a shocking concept for most women.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:06 PM
–

Quoting from the internet - "First degree murder falls into one of the following two categories: Premeditated, intentional killings Felony murder While second degree murder is either: An unplanned, intentional killing; or A death caused by a reckless disregard for human life" Choking a person to death has definite intent and plan as it take time to go through the act completely. It is not as if she just fired a gun in a sudden act of anger. She found a chain-link lamp cord, wrapped it around his…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:08 PM
3

A divorce is simply legally ensuring that she gets whatever she wants from him. In today's society a man cannot really get divorced, if he's being made responsible for his wife's standard of living after the divorce.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:13 PM
–

Charges are upgraded only to manslaughter even though she intentionally tried to kill her husband. She should be charged with 1st degree murder.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:06 PM
15

It's difficult to separate a child from its mother, without the child blaming you for not saving their mother. The best thing to do is - nothing.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:49 AM
13

Because she is a "mother". Who will look after the poor kids ....
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:30 AM
2

Most smartphones have a way to block a number - either voice, sms or whatsapp messages. Just ignore. Don't be rude to her. Just be busy with the rest of your life.
/r/askTRP15/10/15 12:46 PM
–

I don't know how far this is true, but many men are just too scared of getting divorced raped. If he says anything, he looses everything, except his pride. For some men, that is not worth it.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:21 PM
4

What is the impact for a married woman who is placed on the sex offender's registry? Absolutely nothing. She continues to live in the house her husband pays for. She continues to live a lifestyle that her husband can provide her. If she divorces him, she takes the house, alimony, kids and child support. When a man is placed on the registry, he cannot get a job and cannot rent an apartment. He literally is forced to live like a homeless person. Being on the registry is not a punishment for a woma…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:19 PM
–

Actually, Yes. All judges go through a course that trains them on social awareness issues - which is basically female victim theory written by feminists. The N.J.I. says that it "educates" judges in Canada. It regularly conducts something innocuously entitled "social context training" and "skills training". Link Here Judges are smart enough to see through the BS, however, they are under considerable social and political pressure to conform to the social imperitive of the day. A judge that rules …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:06 PM
8

This is the crucial point. Valuations are based on what someone is willing to pay at a certain point. She cannot say that the company was worth 100s of millons if no one had made that offer on the day they signed the divorce settlement. But alas, common sense will not prevail and she will probably end up getting 50%.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:05 PM
6

These men deserve everything they get. Men are wiser now. Men did not realize that the laws could be twisted so much retrospecively to screw them over. When they married 15-20 years ago, the laws were different. Heck, today, if you decide to go on a date with a woman, what is stopping someone from saying 10 years from now that you owe the woman money for her time. As absurd as it sounds now, no one could anticipate that the law would be made so heavily biased in favour of women.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:00 PM
2

Having 2 women wounded in combat and women will freak out.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:09 PM
3

From the article it states that the cops were called, buT for some reason they say they cannot force her to let him in.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 03:16 AM
3

Unfortunately this is a skewed statistic. Most men get married after the age of 30 nowadays. So it is pointless to say that 70% of men below that age are unmarried. I don't support marriage, but these statistics do not prove that men are walking away in droves. What would be interesting is seeing how many men ages 30 - 40 have never been married.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 04:40 PM
92

He said she was vulnerable and had a hard upbringing, spending two years in hospital with leukaemia between the ages of five and seven Poor thing. She was sick when she was 5 years old. How can anyone expect her to recover. /s
/r/PussyPass05/10/15 01:15 PM
–

Wait till we hear accusations of rape every time a female is injured and killed. It will become so pain-staking to defend themselves against these allegations, that male soldiers will just decide not to put females in harms way.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:08 AM
3

The UN has quite a bit of influence in the developing world. I can see them starting to add conditions to curtail cyber-bullying to projects they sponsor.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 02:00 AM
1

If not, she wouldn't' be going so far out of her way to borrow someone else's. Absolutely not. Women love victim status like they love free money. She wants to be associated with all the attention this story will get. Oh and she asked you to go to the hospital, because when it comes to doing any actual work, women will totally back away.
/r/askTRP28/09/15 02:53 AM
1

Social competition. The women who has lost someone is the ultimate victim for a period of time and every woman wants a piece of that.
/r/askTRP28/09/15 02:50 AM
15

Any survey that asks women whether they feel like victims is total bullshit. Find some way to get hard evidence rather than just asking women what they feel. This is like asking anyone fired from a job whether they felt they were treated fairly.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:31 PM
–

Violent cops are welcome, but normal male teachers are viewed as suspicious demons. This is the typical female mind. Women are disgusted by men who they do not consider threatining and they are over eager to please men who are violent.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:17 PM
22

This is most likely a bullshit article written by a woman to kindle the idea that fathers should give their savings to their daughters and not their sons.
/r/PussyPass25/09/15 11:18 PM
9

Where is a cattle-prod when you need one?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/15 11:09 PM
3

Women who lie and avoid responsibility are just doing the same because they know society LETS them get away with it, When society tried to hold women responsible, they complained and whined that they were being oppressed. Women just don't seem to understand how to live as responsible adults in society.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:15 AM
1

It's a diversion. If you started talking about it, she would know that you are at least considering marrying her and now you are fighting about the specifics. She would have just scored a major victory by getting you to tacitly admit that you will be marrying her sometime in the future.
/r/askTRP24/09/15 08:33 PM
7

The feminist hype about this should be enought to convince men, that women don't care about being considered vulnerable, infatalised victims. They care about not getting their way. They are simply willing to say and do whatever is necessary to always get their way. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:15 PM
14

The girl wants the contract so that she knows she has access to your money. No matter how you look at it, marriage is essentially a man signing a contract saying that he will give money to the woman for the rest of her life. No wonder every woman is desperate to get married.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/15 11:23 AM
6

The crying baby gets the milk. A woman who creates drama gets attention and resources to placate her.
/r/askTRP24/09/15 12:11 AM
3

75% of divorces are initiated by women.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:41 AM
37

This is why you should KO the attacker within the first few punches. Women don't let people walk away from situations.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/15 12:19 AM
1

This is partly why women in traditional socities were encouraged to marry stable partners and not run after their hearts desires.
/r/MGTOW18/09/15 08:53 PM
5

Why don't women protect their investment? Because women have never had to do this. They simply marry a man when they are young and they are set for life. Social acceptance of divorce is a relatively new phenomenon. Once women had sons, it was only a matter of time, till the son could support and provide for his mother. So she really never had to do anything in her life.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 02:28 PM
25

let's see if she can be friends with him without asking for help with her homework
/r/PussyPass18/09/15 03:00 AM
2

I hear what you are saying, but this is not the case of anyone being drunk. Are we going to say that if a woman let's her husband beat her up, then we should not do anything? The law (for domestic abuse) as it stands today, does not allow for that, so the law should be applied equally. EDIT: Actually, in the case of men - mental abuse is much more of a real threat to them, because the law is on her side. Both a man and a woman know that he will be put in jail for any DV accusaction she throws at…
/r/PussyPass17/09/15 04:03 PM
–

Don't get fooled that these are "trainings". Just like companies require you to take yearly security training to capture your acceptance of the rules, these Title IX trainings will also be used to show that you agreed to these rules, not matter how lopsided they are.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:35 PM
4

And if a woman had let a man do this to her, everyone would have said that he has terrorized her so that she has no choice. How do we know why he agreed to such treatment? Most likely she has a histroy of mental and physical abuse and that he thought this is the best way to just keep things going. I know that women want one standard for themselves and another on for men, but at least in this sub, let's not allow them to get away with this excuse.
/r/PussyPass17/09/15 03:26 PM
–

Guy does all the work and his wife gets all the benefits.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:22 PM
3

She was also reported to have improved dramatically since receiving treatment, and the court was warned that incarceration would have a negative impact HAHA. Since when do defendants get to "warn the court".
/r/PussyPass16/09/15 08:17 PM
–

No lawyer, no specifying the charge, no cross examination, etc This is how the "law" system looks in a female dominated environment. It takes society back 1000s of years.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:38 AM
1

I just came across this today and it seems that people are already rationalizing that since women cannot meet requirements of frontline positions, they should be in leadership positions that allow them to use their "mental" abilities. Link here
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 11:48 PM
9

One thing I don't understand is how any work is going to get done while the men are in the camp? Well, this is already being started under "child support laws". The family court first asks the father pay more than he earns, which he obiously cannot do. They then put him in prison when he cannot pay. I've read about instances where courts are experimenting with letting the fathers out on a 9-5 basis, so that they go to work, earn money and then return back to prison at the end of the day. This wa…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:25 PM
–

Yeah, and then the idiot feminists will complain about how men are keeping them out of the camp.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:48 PM
124

This is why rape claims used to mean nothing 100 years ago. Society had learnt the hard way that women constantly lie.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 08:47 PM
14

let him have visits in exchange for money Mothers pimping their children for money.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:38 PM
8

Women will handle this like they have for every other industry. They will start saying that women bring other qualities to the table and are more suited to leadership roles. They will in fact, look down on the actual combat roles and I doubt that any of them actually want to be deployed. Just like in the corporate world, where women get stuffed into middle management, when they cannot actually do the job, women will slowly manuveur themselves to take up the non-combat leadership roles in the mil…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 01:13 PM
8

The part in your post that hit home for me was in the last paragraph. The people pushing for these units to be integrated are not the ones enlisting. This is the cornerstone of the women's right's movement. The women who protested for the right to work - were upper class women, who were taken care of by their rich husbands. The women who said that women can have it all - be a mother and work full time, were women who had mostly already raised their kids and did not have the burden of putting kid…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 01:10 PM
1

The solution is simple - keep all-male squads and start new all-female squads. Since women are supposedly equal to men, they don't need male protection in a squad. It would be interesting to see how many female squads actually return from a battle front alive.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 01:04 PM
2

In what way was he "outed". She just showed a screenshot of a person being given a compliment and she acting like as ass about it. She outed herself as an idiot.
/r/MGTOW10/09/15 11:49 PM
2

However, during cross-examination, she deposed that she had lodged a false case under pressure from her husband as he had a monetary dispute with the accused. She tried to falsely implicate one man and it is more than likely that she is blaming her husband to get out of any responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:15 PM
5

Be real, for just a moment. Who is best suited to fight for Syria? No, this is the time for everyone to be real and see what women are really capable of. Everytime, there is a crisis, we say, let the men solve it and once that is done, the women move in to tell the men how oppressed they are. No, now is the time to let women earn the freedom and rights they keep asking for.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:05 PM
4

lolz sorry ladies we're just naturally stronger, more durable, and Army material" Well we don't say that do we? As a society we say, we are all equal and capable. So now when hardships come, we cannot revert to "oh, but the men are stronger" argument.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:02 PM
7

If she is misreporting her income, she is committing tax fraud. You may want to report her to the income tax authorities and let them sort it out. If her income is really just 20K, then they won't find anything. If however it is more, she will pay an income tax fine and will be forced to report her true income.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:20 PM
10

A mother's love for her son is predicated on her using the son as her backup plan. She only needs to depend on another man till her son is 16-18 years old. After that, if she has manipulated her son well, she knows that he will never abandon her, no matter what she does. She then has the perfect beta provider in her son. She does not have to do anything for him, besides reminding him of all the sacrifices she made by being his mother. All this lasts, till the son gets a girlfriend or wife and th…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 12:40 AM
2

True. Europe already has laws that require a certain % of female board members.
/r/MGTOW07/09/15 01:42 PM
1

You're assuming that there are real women on these dating sites. Most of the female profiles are fake. The websites have a financial motivation to get you to become a paid member to get better results. Take their statistics with a grain of salt.
/r/askTRP06/09/15 07:04 PM
17

This. I think we need to highlight this as a fact that women throw out accusations against anyone, without a second thought and without any consequence to them.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:35 AM
2

Your comment is more useful than Dale Carnegie's book.
/r/askTRP04/09/15 05:21 PM
2

While I agee that each person has personal responsibility, men are often convicted and put in jail even when their wife commits suicide. I watched a documentary of a pastor who is serving 8 years in jail after his wife committed suicide. She had left a suicide note and even told her friends that she was depressed enough to commit suicide. The procecution potrayed the husband as a powerful person (being a pastor) who could manipulate her and said that he convinced her to kill herself.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 11:11 PM
3

And as for those saying that the cops are innocent little flowers in all of this... federal law gives them more money for arresting more men in 'domestic' and rape cases, under VAWA. They have a monetary incentive to be biased. I'm not surprised by this. Every law that women have put in place has monetary incentives to screw men over.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 11:21 AM
14

Falsely alleging is now the "go to" tactic for a certain category of bitches. Falsely accusing a man has been a woman's go-to tactic since the begining of civilization. Every culture learned not to trust women's complaints because they always lie. It is a recent phenomenon in western civilization, that women are trusted as though they could do no wrong.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 11:19 AM
0

Men have zero parental rights. The mother can legally take the children away and not allow the husband to ever see them again. It is completely upto her descrition.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:07 AM
–

That's why women don't care for logic. It would prevent them from having their cake and eating it too.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:02 AM
–

Isn't child support rarely enforced against the mother? I haven't heard of any stories where a woman has faced jail time for being a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:01 AM
10

Ego and pride and a huge dose of stupidity. The men of the 50s and 60s started telling their wives that they didn't really contribute to the household work, because every household job was getting automated with machines. When women got together, they bitched about their husbands and usually mocked them for having easy (office) jobs. Women thought they could do anything a man could do and hence thought that the work environment would be a piece of cake. Each generation of women who demanded thes…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 03:22 AM
0

You say necessities of life - however all child support is based on a % of the father's income to make the child's and mother's lifestyle equivalent to his even when he cannot maintain that standard of lifestyle for himself. This is an old bait and switch argument - think of the poor children who need food. When men agree to pay out of sympathy, women turn around and try to grab their entire paycheck.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:41 PM
1

Exactly. Women cannot argue for the right to have an abortion and then at the same time argue that some women feel that they don't have that choice. Sorry women, you made your bed, now go lie in it.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:37 PM
1

Children can be brought up with a certain minimum amount of support. The moment men agree to support the children (they never wanted in the first place ) the conversation turns to how the child "deserves" the lifestyle of the father, even if the father cannot afford that lifestyle anymore. This is an old bait and switch argument. Child support has nothing to so with the child (hint: how many mothers are arrested for squandering child support dollars?). Also, why can the mother not take financial…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:26 PM
–

Hardly. Once women have no financial benefit from mothering children, the number of children born without consent of the father will become almost zero.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:13 PM
2

Exactly. And that is what a marriage contract used to be about. A man making a legal promise to take care of his family, while having the authority to make decisions for the family.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:11 PM
3

That is exactly their plan except that it cannot be so obvious. Women need to figure out how to make a gender neutral sounding law that taxes men only.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:08 PM
9

This is why a contract is needed where a man explicitly says that he wants to be a father. If the mother does not have a legal contract then she can either stop the pregnancy or take care of the child herself. It has become absolutely perverse that women demand the rights to do things which they expect men to take responsibility for.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:02 PM
–

Exactly. If it is about the kid, then why do women have the right to dump the child at an orphanage - no questions asked. The kid's right to child support is only enforced when the child is with mommy. It is obvious that mommy is using the child as nothing more that a means to get a paycheck. In a way she is pimping out her child for money.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:59 PM
10

The stud is very, very often accused of using women and ultimately being an evil person. Never listen to what women say, listen to what they do. Even though women pretend to judge the guys, secretly every single one of them wants to bang him. In the end, it is women who are the ones judging men and women and trying to shame them.
/r/MGTOW24/08/15 01:00 PM
1

the same cannot be said about women. Riiight .. because teenage girls don't fantasize about fucking the college quarterback or the alpha-male in the group.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:03 AM
5

A confession from the girl either recorded or pulled from social media should be sufficient to convict a girl for false rape accusations.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/15 09:29 PM
4

The simple solution would be to treat rape like any other crime and convict a person only based on actual evidence. This will also ensure that women will be responsible to take precautions of their own to avoid a situation where they can get raped. There will be exceptions just like any other crime and we have to accept that justice will not be 100%. It's time to treat women as actually equals rather than as some sacred deities against whom any crime is regarded as horrendous.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/15 09:27 PM
3

Yes that is correct, except that it is not restricted to only crazy girls. When any girl does not receive the attention she wants, she goes into a panic mode as if her life depends on it. At that point she is willing to do anything to get the attention she wants. Another way of looking at it, is that girls are not crazy as long as they get what they want.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/15 09:16 PM
1

That's the face of feminism in India That's the face of women in any part of the world. Women have done this for ages.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:40 AM
3

Yup, so much for the "best interests of the child".
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:45 AM
1

It was a man's fault “In her mind,” Goslee said, “she was protecting her daughter from being not as loved as the boys were by their father.” /s EDIT: Added the /s. Apparently the sarcasm was not obvious.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:41 AM
–

Sure. Women asked for and led the sexual revolution in the 60s and 70s. Women decided that they wanted to have the same (percieved) freedom as men to have sex. However, women also complained that men now have it too easy. So they started pushing the idea that women can retroactively remove consent and hence all sex can potentially be rape. By this, they not only get the freedom to do what they want, but they can criminalize men for just being men. The whole notion of rape culture is predicated o…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:12 PM
2

Women want to cheat and at the same time, be respected for their achievements. Who would have thought? /s
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:25 PM
–

It's only fair that laws against public nudity apply evenly, this actually makes a lot of sense even if it applies to relatively few people I understand where you are coming from, but actually I don't agree that this should be fair. Men and women are fundamentally different biologically. Women who go topless have issues with men looking at them, even when those men are nowhere near them. I have never heard of a man complain that he feared for his safety because women were staring at him. Men and…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 12:17 PM
4

Very true. And in a few years, women will say discrimination kept women out of the trades.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:27 PM
0

You've made good points here. The systematic sabotaging of boys in schools was done purposely to make girls seem equal to boys. Reading material and subjects were changed to be wordy and talk about feelings and emotions intentionally to make it difficult for boys to grasp.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:25 PM
4

This is so true. It is not like girls are becoming the next generation of scientists, mathematicians or engineers. They are graduating en-masse in literature, gender studies and women's issues.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 09:41 PM
2

Having the option for a "financial abortion" would be horrible Women already have this option today and it is not potrayed as being horrible. A woman can just dump her child at an orphanage, no questions asked and she has zero responsibilities for that child from then on. It is only the father who does not have any ability to walk away from a decision the woman made for herself.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:09 AM
2

For almost the entirety of history before these laws were put in place, men stood up and took responsibility for their children. Human society progressed to where it is because men did this. Men even supported their illegitimate children - maybe not upto the standards that the mothers expected, but they still paid her in some way. The cases where men would walk away from their children were a tiny fraction.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:07 AM
–

Once a couple is divorced a woman has no right to be a stay at home mom. She has to work to provide for herself. She cannot live with all the benefits of beings married without any of the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:06 AM
2

I understand this logic. But now that dad is broke, why isn't the court just saying that he does not have to pay that amount. If the reason was only to equalize the income of the parents, then it would be simple to get CS payments reduced when the father is not earning at previous levels. The fact that the court does not do that is clear that the law is there to actually beat the husband into accepting whatever the wife demands.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:17 PM
4

Women put these laws in place to use force by proxy. Instead of stealing money directly, they got the government to steal money for them with the government taking a cut.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:11 PM
–

Even that (ridiculous) logic applies as long as he maintains that lifestyle. Now even after the husband does not have that lifestyle, the wife "thinks she deserves" it as pussy payments.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:08 PM
8

That used to be what the law was, but women changed it so that they could use the kids as as excuse to get money fron the father.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:05 PM
–

I have a child and it doesn't cost 20k per year to live a comfortable life. If we accept that both parents need to contribute 50% financially to the child then payments should not be more than 500 per month per child.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:04 PM
62

Child support is supposedly to keep the child enjoying the lifestyle of the richer parent. Suddenly when the richer parent does not have money, the child still needs to maintain that lifestyle. What an idiotic concept.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:01 PM
2

I agree with you that getting sued does not mean the doctor has done anything wrong. The authors state upfront that they are Background The relationship between male sex and poor performance in doctors remains unclear, with high profile studies showing conflicting results. Nevertheless, it is an important first step towards understanding the causes of poor performance in doctors. This article aims to establish the robustness of the association between male sex and poor performance in doctors, in…
/r/PussyPass14/08/15 03:59 AM
4

It is a stretch to call this piece of garbage a "study". The assumption stated in the introduction, is that there is a relation between the male sex and poor performance as a doctor. The 4 women and 1 man who authored this piece is making the assumption that getting sued is equal to poor performance. The "study" seems to be one of those feminist pieces that tries to show how bad men are and how we would be saved if women just took over the world.
/r/PussyPass14/08/15 03:34 AM
1

I understand what you're saying and agree with you. Your original comment just made me think how easy it may have been for her to manipulate him into making wedding preparations while she sat on the pre-nup.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 07:52 PM
8

I don't know if this is a troll post or not, but women who actually complain like this IRL are not clueless, they are "bragplaining".
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:31 PM
1

The court usually awards 50% of gross income. After the husband pays taxes, the wives get 70-80% of net income. This is very common for child support also.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:17 PM
1

The logic (if you can call it that) is that it is an embarrassment to the woman if the wedding is cancelled. Her reputation gets tarnished, so the husband is apparantly forcing her to sign the document under duress.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:15 PM
1

When I read this story again, it says that she initially did not sign the pre-nup and signed it just days before the wedding. This means that he gave her the pre-nup well in advance and she knew that he wanted her to sign it. She was not pressured to sign it at the last moment. I think it is entirely possible that she knew that a pre-nup signed just before the wedding would not be enforced. He gave her the pre-nup in advance and she just dilly-dallied with it, with the explicit intent of making …
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:01 PM
1

These are just the rules they have in place in now. When most men start following it, they will change the rules and use that as an excuse to discard the pre-nup.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:30 AM
3

I think his point was that pre-nups should not be any different. Why are we treating women specially when they sign contracts. The worst that would happen is that the marriage would be called off and she would be embarassed. Oh god, we can't have a woman feeling embarassed, let's throw out the pre-nup instead.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:27 AM
1

50% of the voters (women) want to keep these laws. It won't change anytime soon.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:22 AM
1

according to his estranged wife. You forgot to highlight this part. The entire story of him willing to do away with a pre-nup is her side of the story. There is no proof that he said that.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:15 AM
1

I think these rules are like moving goal posts. When enough men are aware of these rules and say start asking for pre-nups 2 months in advance, women will start staying that it must be 6 months in advance to show she was not coerced.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:12 AM
1

Give men a false sense of security. They think that society is actually going to hold women responsible for their actions.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 11:06 AM
1

Very good post.
/r/MarriedRedPill10/08/15 06:38 PM
1

Yup, I've seen the same thing in asia, the far east and even the middle east.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:30 PM
6

Well legally, the father's actions grant the child, child support rights. Just saying.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 03:51 PM
2

No it's not a stretch at all. In fact there are women's groups actually advocating for "post birth abortion".
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 03:46 PM
8

In my experience, which is in no way scientific, I've seen that only women who have everything in life pass on that love to their children. The moment mommy is not happy, she starts taking it out on the husband and kids. When the child serves no purpose, that is, no man to hook or no money to be obtained, women will rationalize that the child is a burden that they are justified in getting rid of. Oh, and under these circumstances you will see how much women will treat sons and daughters differen…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 03:42 PM
113

Women are always the first to escalate a situation and resort to physical altercations. As a society, we really need to relook at the whole notion that women must be protected from violence, when in reality they are usually the first ones to start violence.
/r/PussyPass10/08/15 03:20 PM
5

Yes, of course the law is setup that way to ensure that money gets into the hands of mother. The moment the money is in her hands, the law and courts act completely helpless to ensure that the money is actually spent on the child. You know, it would be in the best interests of the child to ensure that the mother is not blowing the child support check on spas and handbags. But the court can apparently "do nothing" to ensure this. Let's drop the charade and call it exactly what it is - mothers are…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:18 AM
10

Reading this piece of shit article depressed the fuck out of me. What the fuck has humanity done to end up in such a sorry state? I guess humanity decided to follow the female impeitive, which by its very nature destroys everything.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 01:02 PM
14

“SEX HAS BECOME SO EASY” Women led the "sexual revolution" and demanded the right to fuck any guy they wanted. Now they are complaining that the guys they choose to fuck (the top 20%) have it too easy. This level of stupidity is astounding.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 12:52 PM
6

That's exactly what I was thinking. I guess this will restrict new users from seeing content and even subscribing to the sub.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 04:01 AM
2

I thought it was obvious that I was being sarcastic.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 05:26 PM
5

Every wife in an unhappy marriage that has sex with her husband when she doesn’t want to, because she believes she has to in order to keep her financial stability, is a rape victim. I work at a shitty job I don't like to keep my financial stability. Now I feel like a slave and the employer must be put in prison.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 05:07 PM
51

Some women are desperate to be victims and compete in a sort of "victim olympics" with each other. The justice system was not designed assuming that people will bring charges just for fun. It discounts what a large portion of women do for a hobby.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/15 04:35 PM
7

but rather there is enough of a doubt in the story Isn't that exactly what she wants to achieve? Her defense attorney levelled all those allegations against the husband. Now suddenly the focus is on what the husband could possibly have done wrong, rather that what she was caught red-handed doing wrong. This is the oldest trick in the book - when a woman gets caught doing something wrong, she tries to deflect blame to a man.
/r/PussyPass04/08/15 03:19 PM
2

He pleaded guilty because the alternative was 10s of years in prison as a child rapist. He would not have lasted days in prison. It is easy to sit back and say that he should have gone to trial, but with a 99% probability of him being found guilty, just because he is a man, he does not really have any choice.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 01:27 PM
2

Rape allegations are a woman's way of locking down or destroying the alpha who is nexting her.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 01:10 PM
2

The deck is stacked against you in every way imaginable on the modern college campus. These people are graduating and bringing this indoctrination into the real world. It won't be long before this ideology infects the corporate world and justice system.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 01:09 PM
–

In fact if women are so tough - then send only women to war, so that they would win. /s
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:00 PM
1

Women like this don't really have a moral compass. For them life is about themselves only.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:59 PM
1

role of mother nowadays is what exactly Nowadays ? Mother's always did exactly the minimum amount required to keep a family together. Men were too busy working long hours to be able to evaluate how much time she was actually working. In a single household, with multiple people and children, housework was divided amoung everyone.
/r/MGTOW30/07/15 07:15 PM
1

Agree. Traditionalism is needed when offices are not cozy enough for women to spend their day in, when the government is too poor to give them handouts and when the police don't spend most of their resources baby-sitting entitled women.
/r/MGTOW30/07/15 07:11 PM
2

That is so true. Feminism is not some strange policital movement that women just hear about when they come to the west. Feminism is basically the politicization of basic female nature. If you take a woman from any part of the world, who has never heard of feminism before and ask her to define principles of a political movement - they will all reflect exactly what feminism is today. AWALT.
/r/MGTOW30/07/15 07:08 PM
1

She is too stupid to recognize her own stupidity.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/15 09:15 PM
1

Yeah, she demands that the officer follow the law and then says she is a free inhabitant and therefore she does not need to follow any laws.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/15 09:12 PM
200

"Women don't lie about rape." /s
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/15 04:13 AM
–

We’ve modelled every decade of life and find that in every one, women have half the savings level of men,’’ Ms Phillips, a New Yorker, said. Maybe that's because women spend more money than men. Ever thought of that? The savings system was designed for men. ROFL .. saving is sexist.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:45 AM
–

Women are 10x more likely to be let off for commiting a crime than a man, so the statistics we have today are completely skewed. Some examples - If a woman assualts a man - "she's just a girl", it's no big deal. She doesn't go to jail If a woman assaults or even kills her husband / boyfriend : She was escaping an "abusive" person. Almost 90% of the time - no penalty for her. Woman doesn't like someone and want to hurt them: easy falsely accuse them of rape or Domestic Violence and let the justic…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:58 PM
79

From the article this sentence stood out - Had a physician carried out the insemination, that would not be the case, because Marotta would be able to document that he was a sperm donor and not the lover of the girl's mother, So the actual difference seems to be whether the man "got sex" or not. If the man got sex from the woman he owes her and has to pay up.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 11:47 PM
3

The female police officer is the only one who can question a woman without being crucified by the media, society and women's groups. If a male police officer were to do that, their career would be over. In fact, it may be an internal political move, to have a female officer raise these questions, so as to avoid any accusations against males.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:23 AM
–

And he pays the bills while she goes off to fuck other guys.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:53 PM
9

Crying and trying to steer the conversation to how she felt is playing the gender card in my opinion. I've heard women saying that "crying is the nuclear option in an argument" because men always back off when a woman starts crying. IMO, this is defnitely a PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/15 02:28 PM
1

She is talking about accusing the husband of criminal wrong-doing like : Physical abuse Marital rape Molestation of their children being on drugs (watch divorce corp to hear how one lawyer planted evidence on a husband) possession of child porn etc. All these are accussations that the husband has to defend against in family court.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:21 AM
–

Not really. Accusations don't stick for women. The family court system starts with assuming the man is guilty. Never works the other way if genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:45 AM
24

Lomas previously received a four-and-a-half month suspended sentence after admitting her part in the scam. suspended sentence =/= jail
/r/PussyPass15/07/15 09:36 PM
3

I agree with you and yet, while these two feminists have openly discussed about how they are going to target and publicly shame Mr. Elliott and ruin his life, no one is calling them out and saying that they deserve to go to jail for that.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:38 PM
13

We need to stop asking women about how unhappy they are and realize that women love being unhappy. We men make the mistake of engaging in conversation about why women are unhappy and what they could possibly want to make them happy. Women crave the attention that comes from being unhappy or being a victim and love to complain. Society worked perfectly when men allowed women to complain and nag and did not act on their complaints. Nowadays society take every single thing that women choose to whin…
/r/MGTOW15/07/15 12:30 PM
1

For me it is to give back to society, either through teaching or by doing volunteer work.
/r/askTRP14/07/15 11:00 PM
–

The present-day judicial system is a system that was originally built by men based on fairness and justice. The college kangaroo court system is a judicial system based on feminine principles of ensuring "safe" spaces, avoiding confrontation and "Listen & Believe". This is the type of society we will have when women start having a majority of the leadership positions.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:54 PM
–

Women have been educated that when they agree (consent) to something, they can change their minds and withdraw that consent retro-actively. This women is doing the same thing. Very soon, we will have laws that state that women cannot be held liable for any contracts that they sign.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:46 PM
–

I don't know how much any amount of proof will help. Rape is being defined as what a woman felt about a sexual encounter. Feminists argue that even if a woman says yes, she could be too afraid of the man to say no. So even if she is actively gives consent, but in her mind thinks that she does not want to consent, it is rape.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:40 PM
1

You look at the legal system we're building and it's incredible risky to hook up with someone you're not married to," said Peter Lake When you're married it's called "marital rape" - same risk, the wife can accuse the husband at any time.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 02:13 AM
–

True. The definition of "rape" in 2015 is "anything done that upsets a woman".
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:27 PM
–

It weakens the control women have over men through DV laws. The way it stands today - a man who is being abused by his wife has two options - either walk away from his home (and risk becoming homeless) or stay at home and risk getting arrested on his wife's whim. A DV shelter for men, will give men an "option" - a place to go to and escape from a woman. (Female) Feminists totally oppose this, as their partners will have options and access to resources that will weaken her total control over him.…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:20 PM
–

Esentially this is what a marriage contract used to be - a legal contract where a man promised to provide for a woman and she agreed to have sex with him. (Religious ceremonies masked this as "agree to have children together") Feminists then brought in "marital rape". A woman can get raped even after signing the contract because she did not "feel" it was consentual. Don't expect any form of proof to be considered sufficient against rape allegations. The whole point of the rape allegation culture…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:02 PM
26

We know that he works 9+ hours a day to maintain our good standard of living True, dad works 9 hours a day for 45 years to support the family. Mom raises children for at most 18 years. Even then, only the first 10 years is her work before the kids start doing their chores and the mom is more of a house manager - making sure everyone else is scheduled to complete all of her work.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 05:30 PM
2

As usual, women get up to run away while men get up to help break up the fight.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/15 04:22 PM
3

Decide where the guys are going after you meet up. My friends and I do this. No need to tell any of the wives where you are actually going.
/r/MarriedRedPill03/07/15 07:17 PM
2

You're right, and this is as clear proof that as we are ever going to see that a "male dominated" website does not care about gender. They only care about whether that person was efficient and could do their job. It's the same in the IT industry. Developers rarely care about gender, they care about whether your code or design is good or not. Women don't like having their feminine privilege taken away.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 03:16 PM
139

A woman's definition of equality - play fewer sets, get more breaks but get equal prize money as men.
/r/PussyPass30/06/15 06:31 PM
10

Most women do that - pretend that they have been knocked out, so that the guys will not hit them again.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/15 04:09 PM
–

France has already passed this law. In the US, while paternity testing is not banned, judges pretend to have their hands tied to reverse child-support decisions when paternity fraud is found.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:05 PM
–

Yes, and the feminist counter move will be to ban paternity testing without the mother's approval. It won't matter if the man had used contraception or not. Since he cannot prove that he is not the father, he will have to pay.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:10 PM
11

They call it "monetizing the male desire". They want men to pay $$ for any release of their natural biological desires. Women somehow know and admit that they cannot earn anything for themselves without controlling male sexuality.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:08 PM
3

This is a common view that women take for all their "issues". Women always believe they are right and men are wrong and it is ok if some innocent men are punished. As a collective group, with voting rights, this worldview is dangerous to society. Take family court as an example - the law has been written assuming all men are dedbeats. It assumes that all women are angels and have to be compensated for the sins of a "bad" husband.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:30 PM
5

"Shit tests" are a woman's way of trying to break you through negative remarks, intimidation and passive bullying. When that does not work aka you pass these shit tests. She tries comfort tests, which are her way of breaking you down through acting vulnerable and emotional. This triggers the protective instinct in men. The end game is the same - you have resources that she wants and she is trying whatever she can to get you to commit those resources to her. Women play this game 24x7x365. There i…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 02:24 PM
13

Everything that is reported is basically what the woman claims happened. Considering that she shot someone in cold blood, what is the likelihood that she didn't murder her son by herself?
/r/PussyPass16/06/15 07:26 PM
1

True. One of the key things women say to young boys is to "not be like those other men who have no respect for women." Boys are being raised to look at other older men suspiciously as though there is something wrong with being a man, just so that women (teachers, mothers, sisters) can make use of them for a few years before they wake up and realize that they are being used.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 11:25 AM
–

because we don't see a fall in birth rates of males in the Western world. This will never catch on - you know why - because in societies where female infanticide is practiced, it is often the older women in the house that do not want a girl child. Often the mother-in-law hounds the daughter-in-law to get a male child. Women want more sons, so that they are taken care of and protected in their old age.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:11 PM
2

Absolutely. Even in more rural societies, a man would think twice before hitting his wife. That wife had a father and brothers, who would stand up for her, if their sister/daughter was ever mistreated. However, men also realized that sometimes women started fights and got hit because of it. I have not heard of any culture in the world where society deemed it ok for men to hit women out of the blue.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:07 PM
10

They would tell the guy to man up and pay his dues.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:47 PM
26

This. Most guys don't realize that their mothers are the first women in their lives that manipulated them into betas for her.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 07:25 PM
3

Not according to the law. Women walk away with half of everything, irrespective of what they put into the marriage.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 12:18 AM
12

This behaviour is not restricted to bars. Women love to pit men against each other and see who comes out on top. In more social settings, they do this through gossip - telling one person something and then saying something else to the other person.
/r/PussyPass07/06/15 12:08 AM
2

This was 11K in addition to what he was already paying. Imagine you pay 23500 of your student loans and then someone says that you actually owe them 25K more.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:45 AM
2

She is baiting you. Probably already spoken with a lawyer and knows how much she will get in a divorce. Now she is just trying to push you into doing something impulsive.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/06/15 10:04 PM
1

She join a cult or something? Her wording is rather twisted She must have spoken to a women's helpline. This is their standard dialogue. Men must be "abusers" so that whatever they do to them is ok.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/06/15 10:01 PM
–

Maybe the fear of being assaulted and raped in prison and then being homeless for the rest of his life was worth dying over. Also, it is his escape from the total domination his ex-wife has over his life, escape from being an slave for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:51 PM
1

Many times the police does not know what to do, because for a gay male couple, they can't see either party as a victim of domestic abuse Why does there need to be a play book to determine who is wrong based on an arbitrary criteria like gender or who is bigger in size? Imagine if the police actually had to use things like evidence to make a judgement, it would totally screw normal hetrosexual women over, since they would not be able to falsely accuse their male partners of DV.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:15 AM
18

At 9:40 you can see the turn in her attitude when she says "Hmm ... so everyone's out." There is a look of seething anger at the sharks. Then she takes a moment to start the tear factory and starts her next performance. Amazing how successful women can be by shedding tears.
/r/PussyPass03/06/15 05:55 PM
17

You simply ask her. Remember women never lie. There are sugar and spice and everything nice.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 11:24 AM
51

This represents the mindset of nearly every single woman alive. Just as men view women from a sexual perspective, women view men from a resources perspective.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/15 07:30 PM
2

It's a great misconception that women take lower paying jobs or work lesser hours because of children. Women often talk about why they feel it is a waste of their time to work. Many women believe that life is to be enjoyed and work is really just a distraction from living a fulfilling life. A woman's primary motivaton is to work less and enjoy life. Having kids is just one of the things she does to enjoy her life.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 04:47 PM
1

Also women take those lower paying jobs because they are not held financially responsible for anyone. Women can live off a man's earnings. This is the primary reason women do not make as much effort to negotiate for higher salaries.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 04:43 PM
2

For a woman Love == need to pay bill Replace the word love with "need to pay my bils" and you will see what women really mean.
/r/MGTOW31/05/15 10:55 PM
6

When women sign a document, it is considered invalid. Just like when women consent to sex and then change their mind. However for men, even when they don't sign a contract (as in the case or co-habitation without getting married), it is assumed that they have implicitly agreed to a contract.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:55 PM
23

This has always been the case. That is why societies have always tried to get men to "settle" down before they hit 30. Once a man realizes that he really does not need a woman for anything - the chances of him getting married are nil.
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 01:39 PM
30

I love the line at the end of the article - How can a matchmaker attract reluctant male clients to a business model that ultimately favours women? There's your answer right there.
/r/MGTOW28/05/15 01:37 PM
–

I suspect the real agenda behind these articles is to prime the female vote bank to allow the US to intervene millitarily if they want to. ISIS may be killing thousands of men, but hey they raped women so let's send in the troops.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:06 AM
28

Giving a woman free therapy is like giving a kid a free trip to disney world.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/15 09:07 PM
9

Exactly. She got 3 days of community service and 1 year of free therapy. If she completes this enormous task, they will drop the charges to a misdemeanor. So she doesn't even have assault on her record, after pleading guilty to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/15 09:06 PM
5

Excellent point. Feminism is the leash through which beta bucks is kept in check.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 11:26 PM
7

I don't think anyone really expected statuatory rape against boys to be taken seriously. The law was written as gender neutral so that it would be easily digestable by the male population. Women always expected this law to be applied only to girls, just like domestic violence laws are mainly applied to men not women.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:46 PM
8

The "argument" is meant to confuse you. You see women don't really have to make sense. They can spew all types of BS and men are left trying to understand what they are saying and prove that it is wrong. They can keep men busy that way. It is only when we realize that the "argument" itself is the game, and we decide not to "play" can men win at this.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 04:34 PM
1

This is a extremely dangerous phase for you. While you'll are living together, she has access to many things that would help her prepare for a divorce. I have heard about divorce lawyers who - Hire other women to seduce the husband, so that they have a case of infidelity. Even though it is a no-fault divorce, it makes the wife look like a victim. Get drugs and have the wives spike their husbands food with low amounts of drugs over a few weeks/months. This shows up as traces in a person's hair wh…
/r/askTRP22/05/15 02:27 PM
1

Well that is exactly what women want. While they say they can work, they will not at any time accept the responsibility for taking care of themselves. It is either some man or the government. And these people have equal voting rights. :/
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:35 PM
2

When a man gets an increment in the wages - the court says that the child has to enjoy the same standard of living and takes more money from him. When the man earns less - the court says the child must enjoy a certain standard of living and hence tells the man to get a second job. This is yet another example of feminist logic working only one way - for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:33 PM
2

I think it is a mistake to believe what women say. The current brand of feminists are doing the same for women as the first wave feminists - they are complaining to get male attention. See I think it is a mistake to assume that most women cared about the "issues" that women's groups fought for. The important thing to most women is that they have some issue to fight about so that men stop what they are doing and give them attention (and ultimately money). In first wave feminism, women just picked…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 07:54 PM
7

More likely she was trying to seduce him into falling for her and then killing her husband.
/r/PussyPass20/05/15 02:36 AM
–

Well at least after her graduation, she can get a job as a mover. She has solid credentials - "carried a mattress around a campus for 4 years".
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:15 PM
1

If you've ever been in a situation where you've said something to a woman only to have all her friends gang up on you - it is the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:53 PM
4

Agree. It could just be teenage girls thinking he is a douchebag for not being nice to them and hence they want to teach him a lesson. Not being nice =/= rape.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:50 PM
–

While both sides should be presumed innocent, only the boy has actually been punished. At this point, it does not matter if he is found innocent. He has already spent time in jail and the girls got to teach him a lesson (if that is what they wanted to do).
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:48 PM
1

No need to explain - just say you changed your mind. You have absolutely every right to do that. Don't feel guilty for it.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/05/15 01:42 PM
16

Women are getting pissed that it is becoming more difficult to file a false allegation. Rape allegations, dometic violence allegations, sexual harrasment allegations are a woman's way of earning money to survive. They see absolutely nothing wrong in deceitfully taking money away from a man. Hence they will see any attempt to take away this power as 'oppression'.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 12:57 PM
4

IF you're serious about your career What if you're not and like millions of women are looking for a golden parachute (aka sexual harrasment lawsuit) to retire early?
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 12:53 PM
8

I think society evolved into a stable environment where everyone could get some basic needs met - like food, clothing and sex. In the old tribal system, the alpha male was only so powerful, till a group of non-alphas banded together and killed him. The 20% alpha males soon learnt that being in constant open competition with the remaining 80% is a losing proposition, so a treaty evolved, where every man could get some basic food, clothing and the right to have a wife. This structure benefited eve…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 06:55 PM
2

Totally agree. I have always said that Asian societies are highly gynocentric in nature, with the difference being that the "mother" plays a more important role than the "wife". In traditional asian joint families, when a woman is young, she lives with her husband and in-laws and does not have the freedom to do what she wants. She waits to live her life out when her son grows up and she is now the queen bee in the house. The cycle then repeats itself with her becoming the mother-in-law.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 03:12 PM
–

Well women are asking for men to be convicted of rape if they lie about their job or income. So I guess the answer is yes. You can get the man arrested for rape if at any time you feel he defrauded you in any way.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:03 PM
5

If it were for the benefit of the child, the judicial system would be actively ensuring that every single penny is spent on the child. They don't. They don't even want to discuss how a mother spends the money. They are only concerned about ensuring that a man pays a woman. And yes, it is only for men. Rarely does a woman get locked up for failing to pay child support. Child support is just women using children as bargaining chips to get money from men. I know women don't want us to say this beca…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:01 PM
2

For a man - all consent is implicit, while for a woman all consent has to be proving by the man. No means No and Yes sometimes also mean No.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:57 PM
11

He held up a camera. She heard a picture being taken. She does not know whether it is a picture of her kids or a selfie. So she does what any right minded woman does - she goes with her feels.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 02:32 PM
10

The only person talking sense there is that old woman. She said to one of the white knights - "Why don't you pay her taxi fare then?"
/r/MGTOW07/05/15 01:22 PM
–

In all seriousness, 50% is a conservative estimate if we actually talk about the act of violence itself. Women are far more likely to lash out, kick, punch, scream and throw things at their partners. They are far more likely to be physically violent with even strangers because of the societal safety net of "You never hit a woman". In order to maneuver around this fact, women steer the defnition of domestic voilence to "women who end up in hospital" or "women who are scared for their lives", so t…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 11:14 AM
3

The kind of prosecutor who is more scared of being called a misogynist than of upholding the law.
/r/PussyPass07/05/15 01:22 AM
2

This is not because insurers are flouting the EU rules which ban gender discrimination - rather it is because they usually charge more to cover those in male-dominated jobs than female-dominated ones. So they are discriminating. They just figured out how to reword the discrimination so that mostly men are affected.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:13 PM
–

Has anyone ever asked the women in gender studies programs why they didn't go into STEM fields? Well asking a woman if she is oppressed is like asking a child if they want candy. All the women in gender studies are professional victims. They would gladly explain at length why they have been victimized by the whole world.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:21 PM
5

Reading this, I'm wondering if her motivation was to steal his sperm. After all sperm is worth 18 years of income nowadays.
/r/PussyPass28/04/15 05:25 PM
–

It makes sense on some level, if you have one person working and one staying at home, that you can evaluate how much the one staying at home is contributing towards allowing the person working to be able to do the work that they do This argument is so completely wrong it is not funny. The person staying at home does not contribute anything directly to the other person's earnings. Women went to the courts asking not to be left destitute after a divorce. When the courts allowed to take a man's mon…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:31 PM
–

I don't understand why what she's "used to" factors into anything, is she a fucking baby? As part of the fight for women's "rights" - Women demanded the "human right" to continue in the lifestyle they lived when they were married. They don't care how they get the lifestyle as long as someone gives it to them. This is why a large portion of "women's rights" are just a synonym for "women's entitlements".
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:27 PM
8

That's a pussypass. The normal thing to do, would be to rule her claim as "insane" and tell her she is worth nothing.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:26 PM
10

From the article - In court, Faye Eichelberger claimed she was used to "being entertained by royalty and dignitaries in castles," Women are so comfortable thinking it is their "right" to make ridiculous demands of others.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:23 PM
5

I totally agree with you. 'Tired' is her way of saying - "don't expect anything of me". I bet she would be telling the kids the same thing - that she is so tired of working for their dad, that she doesn't have time for them. She thus gets away by doing almost nothing for anyone, while making everyone feel guilty that she is working harder than anyone else.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 05:55 PM
6

Women put priority on more time with their family and friends enjoying their lives on other people's money than working themselves. FTFY
/r/MGTOW24/04/15 05:53 PM
46

All counselling is targetted towards women, because women are the majority of customers who want to go in for counselling. The moment a therapist hints that the wife may be at fault, she will refuse to see that therapist again. I've seen it happen so often.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 12:51 PM
45

She earned it. She has supported him while OP is looking for a job. She should get 50% of whatever OP makes in the future - forever. /s
/r/askTRP21/04/15 03:01 PM
1

They do grasp it, that is why they try so hard to deny it. Also, they know that men think logically and it is hard for men to process nonsense. Hence their conversations are always illogical and they demand that men try to "understand" them.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 11:40 AM
2

Participation in an activity is highly dependent on other variables--wealth, class, culture, etc. And none of those factors apply to chess. And none of those factors apply to the exceptionally privileged women in the first world.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 11:38 AM
1

I'm guessing it's the same reason why women's magazines are mindless gossip, women's daytime TV is mindless blabber and one of the best selling books and movies in recent times targetted to women is crap (50 shades of ...).
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 11:32 AM
138

Every woman who steps up to hit a man twice her size should be given a Darwin award.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/15 12:38 PM
3

99% of people who see combat are male Because men stand up to protect women. Women have the ultimate privilege of just standing back and letting men die for them, or if they choose, they can join the armed forces in a combat or non-combat role. When looking at privilege, men often do not have the choice to die or not when they are often forced into wars.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:33 AM
160

Yet if he had started a company and made a million dollars while she stayed at home - she would have earned a 50% share because she supported him. Funny how that 50% share does not get applied when they both do something wrong together.
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 05:22 PM
–

Interesting. My mind jumps to, "but what if you spill coffee on your shirt? Did you pack and extra shirt? What if, now, a bus sprays dirty rainwater on your pants? Did you bring extra pants?" No, I'd never carry an extra pair of pants and shirts. I'd also never complain if I couldn't be on time for an interview if my clothes got dirty or if I made it and they didn't give me a job. I would fully accept that I can't expect someone else to make exceptions for me. It would be nice if they did, but i…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:18 PM
–

does anyone else think that it is far more likely that the female hiring manager would notice and object to a run in her tights than the two male engineers? Absolutely !! "look she has a run in her thights" - said no man ever.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:13 PM
–

You're absolutely spot on. There may be two great candidates and one just feels right, has the correct vibe and has more enthusiam in their voice. That person will get hired.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:07 PM
–

I'd take the picture with a grain of salt. This is how she dressed up to post the picture on facebook. No one knows if this is how she really dressed for the interview.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:05 PM
–

My opinion here is that there is nothing wrong with what she was wearing, and if I was interviewing her, it wouldn't have been an issue. I think this was more that the female hiring manager didn't like her and was being catty.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:59 PM
–

A person who expects a company to understand that "she is running late" has some real entitlement. If I was late for an interview for whatever reason, I would never blame the company for rejecting me.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:57 PM
–

There is no direct equivalent to a man's jeans and tee shirts. The company would be right to denied a male applicant who arrived in jeans and a T-shirt. I've worked in the same industry for a long time and even when the IT staff dress in jeans and t-shirts, all the people who come for interviews dress formally, at least with ties. I've not seen a man come for an interview in jeans and a t-shirt and get accepted, unless you have some really high end skills and the employer is chasing you down. Yo…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:54 PM
–

These employers showed rigidity, which is completely in their right as the bourgoise. It's just not really ethically righteous. It is absolutely the right this to do. If this person has problems following rules before she starts the job, how much more difficult it will be once she starts working there.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:52 PM
6

This has nothing to do with sexism or gender. She didn't meet their standards of professionalism. PERIOD. Yes and the female hiring manager made it a point to tell her. I don't know any male hiring manager who would have said anything but "We decided to go with someone else". Both the females in this story are incompetent.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:49 PM
10

I wish I could upvote you more. Women are always pushing the boundaries of what is acceptable. I once worked in a company that said you can't wear flip-flops to work. Seems reasonable, till the women started arguing that there are so many different type of women's sandals and open shoes that the rule does not apply to them.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:47 PM
3

Yes, in the most basic sense, the nature of the human male-female relationship is prostitution. This is the same dynamic seen in many other species in nature and there is nothing inherently wrong with it. In fact, in species where the male mates with the female and does not stay around, there is more likelihood of those offspring being killed and that male's genes not being passes to the next generation.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 01:36 PM
0

What's really fucked up is to do favors for someone expecting sex in return. What's really fucked up is when women demand that men do them favours and give them money before they agree to have sex. Women are setting the "price" for sex.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 01:26 PM
9

"The women were under the man's spell" - this is an actual defense used in court in a recent case, where 3 women kidnapped and tortured a man recently and got away scott free.
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 11:19 AM
–

Reminds me of Anita Sarkeesian
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:23 PM
8

The boys are struggling The boys are not struggling. They are being abused by these feminists teachers. They are trying to work within a system in which they cannot win.
/r/PussyPass16/04/15 12:35 AM
2

But I just want the dawn bitch to respect me and treat me like a man If you want this, then stop doing this I started to berate her again Women do not respect men who show emotions. If you really want her respect - then treat her like you do not need her. Of course, the question is what do you get out of this. Sometimes women are not worth the hassle.
/r/askTRP15/04/15 02:48 PM
4

Both boys and girls desperately need fathers in their life especially after the age of 6-7. Motherly love can take a child only so far. Once the child starts exploring the world and dealing with other people, they need a father to teach them that the world is not fair, that you cannot control everything, that you need to work hard to get results, that when you make a mistake you should own up to it and learn from that. Women are particularly bad at this, even when they have the best interests of…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 01:05 PM
–

Actually yes they are the same thing. "Removed from the house" can be done only by arresting someone and "letting him cool off for the night in a jail cell". When the cops remove a man from the house they don't put him up in a hotel or let him roam free. The law is specifically designed to ensure that the wife can have the husband in jail so that he cannot get to her, since she is "afraid". "Removed from the house" is a euphemism that feminists used to cloak the fact that they demanded women hav…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:57 AM
–

Yes, and women do it to men more often than any man will admit it. In fact, the normal strategy for wives is to slowly remove friends she doesn't like by creating drama and making the husband choose - either her or the friends. It is so common that women refuse to believe that they are abusers. They consider it abuse only when a man does it to a woman.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:28 AM
–

He wouldn't get arrested unless there was an accusation of domestic violence. Why wouldn't there be? The first go to argument for any woman when confronted is that she is "afraid". That itself is sufficient to get him arrested and removed from the house.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:24 AM
9

So she married him Ironically women complained that they were considered "property" in marriage before feminism, while the same women even today consider husbands as their property and slaves after getting married.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:22 AM
7

I think she said - If we give higher marks to girls in certain subjects they are likely to take those subjects up later in life, because they learnt that they don't have to really work hard. They can work much less than others and still get the same results. This discovery should get the author a nobel prize. Oh wait - Imagine if we gave women more nobel prizes, they may want to take those subjects. Hooray !!! Now who wants to take a flight designed by the girl who got extra marks in math for be…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:25 AM
12

I sacrificed 3 weeks of my work to go to Jamaica. Someone has got to compensate me for life. /s Men have no gaurantees in life. You could spend 10 years in a small company hoping that it would go big only to have it bust in the end. Women need to grow up and accept that they need to be responsible for themselves. Divorce exists and marriage is not a life long guarantee of income.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:15 AM
–

It wasn't a blunder. Women fought to take the children so that they could use the kids as an excuse to get money from the man.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:12 AM
6

They typically don't place as high a value on earning money as what guys do. FTFY At the same time, they place an exceedingly high value of getting money for the least amount of work.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:07 PM
2

Seems like an easy way to erode your overall competitiveness by putting merit in the back seat over diversity quotas. True, but if all the companies are forced to have these diversity quotas, they will all share the same level of handicap. I see this in other industries also. A job that a man used to do single handed is now done by a group of people led by a female manager. 5 people are brought together to build a consensus and create say, a project plan that should have been primarily done by a…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:05 PM
4

This is the level of stupidity should be flat out dis-respected. Anyone - man or woman who supports this level of stupidity should be criticized harshly.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:53 PM
11

They are not stupid. This is the standard female bullying technique. Women will just repeat the same BS again and again and again. At first, a man will try to reason with her and answer factually. She will continue with the BS unchanged. At some point he gets frustrated and keeps quiet. She will continue with the BS unchanged. He will then get so frustrated that he will just give her something ... anything just to get rid of her. This is her victory. She will take what she can get and then start…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:42 PM
–

If anything women are earning 170% what men earn - as a net flow from male pockets to female pockets. +1 to this. Women account for 80% of consumer spending. Where do they get that money from? From the men obviously. Women choose lower paying jobs, not because of children and child care choice, but because there is very little correlation between how much they earn and what lifestyle they live. A women can earn 30K per year and live in a million dollar house if her husband earns enough. After ge…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:38 PM
8

If women actually did some productive work, rather than spending their time making stupid, factually incorrect posters - maybe they would earn those 22 cents extra. /s
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:33 PM
4

I love how women think they can just make up the rules. If she wants all the benefits without any responsibility, she just goes ahead and demands that - and if society does not step up - she is oppressed by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:26 PM
–

The best line from her "advice". It also makes me angry that not one guy at the party tried to put a stop to it and considered how you were going to feel the next day.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:12 PM
–

If we let men not get married, they will keep all the money they earn and not give it to strong independent women. How will women be independent if men don't man up and provide for them. Those bastards - take their money anyway. That will show them. /s
/r/MensRights12/04/15 01:20 PM
19

Women call this their "starter" husband. Someone straight out of college who will pay her bills, while she finds herself.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 06:40 PM
–

How many times does this have to be pointed out "number of degrees" is a completely meaningless metric, +1 to this. Women's studies "degrees" are nothing more than a course on victimization and gossip. It is like taking 20 years of talk shows and making a university course on it.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:24 AM
–

Well, how about you be specific and elaborate exactly what the partnership of marriage really is. Do you mean that in 2015, a wife is supposed to support her husband by cooking for him, doing his laundary, taking care of the children by herself, buying groceries, penny-pinching to save money, etc. Is that the support that modern women provide? If you say yes, then you're saying that women have no right to complain that a man does not do his "fair share". Sitting on the sidelines and "supporting"…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:45 AM
–

supported his career the whole time Yeah right. Just like sports fans support their favourite teams. That would make each fan entitled to earn exactly what the player earns. Or how about the driver of the public bus that you take to work. Without the bus you won't get to work, so somehow the bus driver is entitled to a 50% cut of everyone's salary.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:13 AM
23

He wasn't proven to be innocent, rather there was a lack of evidence. Really? So I'll claim that all women rape on a daily basis. They are not innocent, there's just a lack of evidence to prove it. /s
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:42 PM
2

No. She can decide at any time to stop working after getting married and you are then automatically responsible to maintain her quality of life. There is absolutely no logical reasoning when it comes to family courts. You cannot protect your assets once you get married, because the premise of the family judicial system, is the the husband is in the wrong and has to pay atonement to his wife.
/r/askTRP07/04/15 12:00 PM
1

Men bring in the resources and women divide those resources between themselves. They have to compete with each other to get the most resources. There is no point in being nice to someone else because they cannot work together to get more resources. In fact, when families were large and many females lived together, there was a state of perpetual cold war among the females (think mother-in-law, daughter-in-law or between sisters-in-law). Women have evolved to live in this perpetual state of drama,…
/r/askTRP07/04/15 11:41 AM
22

You cannot negotiate desire. But women can destroy a young man's self esteem through shaming tactics to make them think that they cannot do better. It is literally emotional manipulation to make women's prospects better.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 05:28 PM
3

we need to look at how boys and girls are raised This is an interesting article I just came across today. 22 Myths that Women Teach Young Men in Order to Chauvinistically Exploit the Next Generation Women are largely responsible for raising boys and girls and they teach boys to be submissive while they teach girls to be manipulative. The end goal is to enslave the boys as long as they can for their benefit.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 05:19 PM
–

Yes, but when the company fails - all she has to say is that the men were sexist and could not follow female leadership. Then spring on to the next company to destroy.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:01 PM
6

But ... women have been conditioned to believe that a man earns his money only with their support. So they can't understand why a man would not want to marry so that he can earn his big bucks.
/r/MGTOW05/04/15 02:37 AM
1

Don't think that the "let'em choose" approach is correct in physical fitness in the public school system. I agree and want to add that this approach is not right with children in any system. Children are children because they cannot / do not make the right decisions when left to themselves. That is why we wait till someone is 18 to consider them an adult. Children require direction and leadership, not the new-age helicopter parenting revolving around feels.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:51 PM
29

Out of the concern that they may lose their other 3 children to social services Because "they" abused alocohol during the pregnancy and didn't want anyone to find out. Which actually means the mother was drinking while pregnant and should actually hold more responsibility for the child being still born.
/r/PussyPass29/03/15 04:12 PM
2

From the article - Ferguson stomps and kicks Taylor’s head multiple times before a merciful spectator carries a motionless Taylor to safety. The "spectator" was a man, who stepped in to help her. Where are all the strong and independant women when things like this happen?
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 01:41 PM
2

The pussy pass is a man problem and it's up to us to kill it. That's beacuse men are targetted by the media and labelled misogynists if they don't comply to the feminine imperitive.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:35 PM
–

You mean like getting suspended sentences or community services for kidnapping and torture? Women kidnap and torture man, burning his penis. Community service.. no jail time. Women blame each other, and the man.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:31 PM
5

The ideology of feminism IS equality Equal rights without equal responsibilities is not equality. Feminism has worked hard over decades to construe excuse after excuse as to why women deserve the rights, but should never be held responsible. This is the definition of privilege - not equality.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:12 PM
9

The western world is already exactly like Afghanistan in other areas of law, except with the genders reversed. Men have no parental rights, cannot really get divorced without financial destruction, can be put in jail on the whim of a woman no matter how unreliable, etc.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:56 PM
–

Exactly. If girls learn better when boys are not present, then by all means have boys-only / girls-only schools. The education system will never allow this, because boys will surpass the girls easily. It is only when boys are held back, the genders can be shown to be equal.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:53 PM
28

The media has changed over the year as it become more feminized. The media no longer reports news, it is mainly sensational gossip. This correlates perfectly with the rise of women in the profession of journalism.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:36 PM
–

No, they were shamed by women who had nothing better to do.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:32 PM
6

This also has to do, with the fact that women never ever want to feel indebted to someone. I'm sure the boss couldn't bear the thought of sharing the same office with someone she owes her life to. Everyone would tell the boss how wonderful that woman was, and it would destroy her self image. There was only one thing she could do. Fire her.
/r/MGTOW16/03/15 04:28 PM
4

For child support there is a concept of 'imputed income'. The court decides how much you should have been making, even if your current salary is way lower. So if you are a programmer who is supposed to make 70,000 per year, but you are actually making 55,000; the child support is calculated on the 70K imputed income.
/r/MGTOW14/03/15 06:05 PM
1

True, but women are the ones deciding, by their majority vote, what the politician should do to appease them.
/r/MGTOW13/03/15 02:44 PM
5

Some women have started asking for the right to kill babies post birth. Planned Parenthood Rep Claims Right to Kill Babies After Birth Anything that a woman wants to do, including the murder of infants seems to be fair game for them. Remind me again why they are allowed to vote.
/r/MGTOW13/03/15 01:24 PM
13

Pretty disgraceful mindset Pretty common mindset among women. If a man cheats on a woman, women say he is scum. If a woman cheats on a man, women say that he made her do it.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 01:20 PM
–

I just shake my head, they are the community that most needs to see it. The amount of people there clamouring about how prevalent drugging is when it is so so rare There is a term for this called - brag-plaining. Women love to complain about how they are victims and compete with each other for victim status. Never take the complaint itself seriously. They are good at making up stories to out-maneuver each other in the victim olympics.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:11 PM
14

If these women were just "hanging around" ISIS basically, rather than actually shooting people, lack of charges may actually make sense. When a man is successful, the wife expects 50% because she 'supported' him. This is the accepted norm in the western world today, so we should just as likely make the same assumption that when the man does something bad like killing other people, the wife shares 50% of the blame. After all, she supported him.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:00 PM
8

It has been a sliding scale for women for thousands of years. They always change the rules to benefit themselves. When you say "people need to make up their minds" it actually is "men need to make up their minds". Women are simply playing dirty to get as much as they can.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:57 PM
7

The desire to save the world can make a man into a slave - a slave to ideals. An impassioned man, fighting against perceived injustice, is a potent soldier, willing to sacrifice himself for "the greater good". This is exactly why feminists want men to join their ranks (#HeForShe). Once some men are convinced in the myth of feminism, they are perfect soldiers. The generals (women) will sit back, relax and watch how men fight with each other over ideals.
/r/MGTOW11/03/15 12:34 PM
22

BTW, I have always wondered, why is it the men, who are traditionally proposing? Marriage is a cost to us and a benefit to women. Why aren't they the active side? Or maybe they are, but covertly. The reason women break down is tears when a man proposes, is because she has been covertly trying to convince him to marry her. When he proposes, it is the successful culmination of her efforts. She feels relieved that her effort has paid off and now she can relax.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 05:45 PM
66

This is exactly what I think the current swath of anti-feminist women are about. They see that feminism is driving men away, so they will pretend to be anti-feminist, while enjoying all the privileges that the law provides.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 03:07 PM
68

I had a conversation just this weekend with a woman who said that men are cowards if they don't agree to get married. She was serious. Can you imagine, such people have the power to vote.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 03:04 PM
8

I remember watching a BBC documentary some time ago, about a tribe that had very little contact with the outside world. They still lived primarily as hunter gatherers. What stood out to me, was that when the women were interviewed, their main comment was that their men are lazy and sleep all day. This was because the men had returned from a hunt and were resting. They completely ignored the fact that they had the luxury of being safely at home while their husbands risked their lives hunting anim…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 02:57 PM
7

You're assuming that women are arguing this because they see it as a fair argument. They are actually fighting to use the law as a weapon in their relationships and that is why the law is so absurd. They are trying to make it so that men can never prove that they are innocent.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 07:05 PM
5

The operative word here is "his rights". She (rightly) assumes that this standard will never be applied to a woman.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 06:58 PM
3

Women are dishonest even to that level. +1 to that. Women do not even see this as being dishonest. They believe that anything a woman does to a man is fair game, because she is "weaker" and just trying to survive this big evil man.
/r/askTRP04/03/15 12:24 PM
2

Except that feminists hold complete instituional power nowadays and since feminism is the prioritization of women's rights, all institutional power is channeled by women.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:58 PM
4

Women do not feel demeaned to potray themselves as weak. A woman's greatest strength is her facade of weakness and a man's greatess weakness is his facade of strength.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:56 PM
3

Or the laws will be selectively applied to men only - like every single law that women lobby for.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 06:11 PM
–

Helping boys is the same as murdering girls apparently. It is not even about helping boys. It is about not intentionally sabotaging them. Everyone knows how to change the schools to make boys lag and girls come out ahead, but mysteriously, no one knows how to reverse the trend. There is not enough research in that area it seems. /s While we look at the data, it is obvious that girls are not really better than boys when it comes to knowledge. The ability of girls to read more emotionally charged …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:37 PM
–

who--by agreement with her husband Who said this is with agreement with the husband? Wives can do whatever they want. Where is the proof that the husband agreed to this? This line of reasoning is a throw-back to the old days when women could say that their husbands didn't want them to work. In every single case, it is the wife who doesn't want to work and usually makes it miserable enough for the husband so that he agrees. Then somehow it is his decision that he kept her at home.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:29 AM
17

The other reason is that the cute / pretty ones can get stuff just by being cute. People will fall over themselves to take her out or buy her things. This tendency of falsely crying rape is attention-whoring by women who cannot get attention any other way.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/15 04:34 PM
7

I think Hollywood tries to pay everyone as low as they can.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:18 PM
2

Absolutely. For women, their children serve as their solipsistic echo chamber. Once children start growing up and have a mind of their own, mothers usually amp up being emotionally manipulative. Most people don't realize how much their mothers manipluated them, until well into their adulthood.
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 03:40 PM
19

This would open the door the the possibility that sometime when the girl is a minor, she may have been a willing participant also. People don't want to accept that.
/r/MGTOW20/02/15 12:19 PM
7

Or she could get the therapy she needs on her own. Why is the college suddenly responsible for her mental health?
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 12:16 PM
21

Shit. Don't give them ideas.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:38 AM
–

They could easily just deny the mother any welfare benefits until she can prove who the father is. This would allow them to manage the state's support burden, while maintaining some semblance of fairness. However this means that women have to bear some responsibility and we all know that women as a group will never accept that. The judges in this feminist dominated system are left with trying to figure out how to place the blame on men when women make irresponsible decisions.
/r/PussyPass19/02/15 01:35 AM
–

Actually, the current law in some places defines that as statutory rape. MRAs argue that the current law should be applied fairly to everyone irrespective of gender. Society should not blindly say a 16-year girl was raped while saying that a 16-year old boys cannot be raped. It seems logical and fair.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:17 PM
10

Feminists are making a push to get women into Biology, so that they can use their position to create studies that support the feminist viewpoint.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 06:42 PM
9

This is exactly why society 100 years ago did not respect women. It is not that they were treated badly, but they were not treated with the same respect as some who took responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:19 AM
7

Combine that with the constant redifintion of the word rape by feminists and what they are actually saying is that a man should be convicted if a woman is raped just feels like it and no one should question her. Basically it boils down to Women should own men like slaves.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:42 AM
–

one who has to get legal consent, because women aren't responsible enough to handle sex on their own." "You're not LISTENING !!!!!!" - all feminists
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:38 AM
13

But what if she wants him punished because he wasn't nice to her? How dare we challenge a woman's right to control a man. That's oppression. /s
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:36 AM
1

Feel sorry for you man. I read a comment (by a woman) in another thread that made me realize how women think about this. The comment basically said that she wanted to date 'assholes' because if he dumps her, she can always say that he was an asshole, but if she goes with the nice guy and he dumps her, she has to accept thay she may be a horrible person that even a nice guy would dump. You ex is projecting all that vile shit onto you to justify to herself why she is a horrible person.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 08:11 PM
–

Who does the elected government listen to? The majority of the voters. If there is a large group of voters who want something, the elected government will pander to them. That is what I meant, when I said men should form a cohesive group. Right now, men do not vote based on gender politics, while women demand to be catered to as a political group. That is why they are winning. This goes for any special interest group that have sufficient numbers in a democracy. Take for example, in the US, the g…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:05 AM
1

I must be oppressing them by not letting them run my life and hit me with shit. I know you are being sarcastic, but you actually articulated what women think. Women feel they are oppressed if they are not allowed to abuse men.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 03:55 AM
1

because if the girl regrets sleeping with you... well... that's rape guys. Or if you don't make it worth her while in terms of $$ and attention
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 03:53 AM
2

That woman is not qualified to roam freely in a sane society. Who let her out of the nut house?
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 03:28 AM
–

Because the wife does not want that. The system is designed to rob men of their money and allow women to get the revenge that they want.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:45 AM
–

Why is this tolerated by society Because 50% of society that votes, have demanded the right to rob the other 50%. Until men form a cohesive group, the power of the 50% womens' vote will not be challenged.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:43 AM
3

Her boyfriend made her do it. You see she is a strong independent college educated woman, who just blames her boyfriend for all of her faults.
/r/PussyPass11/02/15 09:07 PM
14

French women.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:07 PM
11

It is a game logic has no place or participation in, a game you can win only by not playing. This. No matter how bad it makes you look, the only way to win is by not playing.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 05:26 PM
15

Yes, but that is exactly what she wanted. She would be thrilled to know she got two guys into a fight. Violence by proxy.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 05:20 PM
3

You're right. That is what I meant.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:57 PM
–

Women need to keep re-iterating that their spouses are incompetent just to support their fragile egos. Otherwise they would have to accept that house work is not that difficult, can be done by anyone and requires no skill. To their horror, most men are miles ahead of women when they decide to put their mind to doing house work well. I recently was suprised that I had to explain to a 15-year SAHM the options on her dishwasher and how to use different cycles for different types of loads.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:42 PM
20

The cbc headline says "Questions are being raised about whether railways are providing enough training for conductors" Questions are being raised, because a woman has fucked up. If she had said that the train derailed because of global warming, suddendly everyone would be asking what we can do to fix climate change. /s
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 03:13 PM
18

Instead she waited until after the event to complain about insufficient training. After thousands of dollars worth of damages have been done. She probably thought - "What's the big deal? If stupid men can do it, I can do it better!"
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 03:09 PM
–

You're absolutely right. You see men don't understand this immense profitability in being a victim. Women innately know that being a victim puts them on top of everyone else in terms of attention and donations. That is why women compete to be victims - it is the ultimate free pass in life. Once you've established yourself as a true victim, society will cater to you and you don't have to work again in your life. The 'single mom' victims are amateurs when compared to professionals like Sarkeesian.…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:21 AM
29

The beauty is that women, within their private relationships, keep demanding to stay at home and not work and then in public keep blaming men for not allowing them to work.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 04:40 PM
–

This story probably represents what almost every female considers rape - when a man does not respond with commitment and a relationship after she has had consexual sex with him. Many women don't want to openly admit it, but they consider sex one part of a transaction. They have to get something in return for having sex with a guy. If they don't get what they expect, they feel cheated and hence raped.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:27 PM
1

The female ego is so brittle because women love to be offended. When they are offended, men step up and cater to them. So being sensitive and hysterical, results in women getting things provided for them.
/r/askTRP07/02/15 01:09 PM
4

Yes a mob lynching is far 'superior' to a criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:24 PM
3

In China, the man traditionally hands over his entire wage packet each month to the wife, who usually manages the family's financial affairs. Women are oppressed in China ! /s
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:17 PM
2

Sort of. Actually she is arguing that the leadership is male and hence white males get the credit. She wants white males to do the work and have women in leadership positions so that they can get the credit for the work done by the men.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:35 PM
22

Rape is different because women believe it is one thing that only men can do. So no matter how harsh and ridiculous they make the laws around rape, they believe it will only impact men. Rape is just a stick women are using to beat men into submission.
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 11:22 PM
7

Why restrict this Consent only to rape? Consent is needed when any two human beings interact with each other. When a girlfriend wants to use my car or eat food at my place, she should have positive consent and if she cannot prove that she had my consent I should be able to get her arrested for stealing or trespassing. She cannot assume that just because she has been living with me, she can use my things. Right?
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 11:18 PM
-4

Many areas in Britain have become 'Men Deserts'.
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 11:14 PM
9

When men stand up and start fighting back. It won't look pretty. Men will look like the aggressors, because women will act as perpetual victims.
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 11:13 PM
11

"I signed under duress. It was rape your honor."
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 11:11 PM
5

Good thing all the CS jobs are moving to India and China where feminism has no such power! I know firsthand that the top 5 Indian IT companies have quotas of around 30%-35% women in their ranks, in order to comply to the western idea of good corporate ethics. Feminism is unfortunately just the politicization of basic female nature. It will mushroom, whenever women are given power. A country like India with a 50% female population with voting rights, has already enacted all the feminist laws that…
/r/MGTOW03/02/15 03:48 PM
1

In criminal cases, isn't it the state v/s the acccused? The State offered her a lenient plea bargain, which is the definition of a pussypass. The victim does not have any say to accept her plea bargain or not.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 01:51 PM
4

Women at that time, all fought for the right to not work and stay at home. Women shamed their men, for needing them to work. Men slowly improved their lot and a large number of their wives did not have to work. The wives then turned around and said that men have oppressed them by (listening to them and) allowing them to stay at home.
/r/RedPillWomen03/02/15 03:06 AM
6

Then the SJWs will say, look 50% of the CS graduates are women, but they are not getting 50% of the jobs which will be corrected with quotas for women in CS jobs.
/r/MGTOW03/02/15 02:13 AM
7

It takes a certain emptiness in your heart You have just described the female mind perfectly. Women are emotional when it comes to their situation. They are completely cold hearted when it comes to anyone else.
/r/MGTOW03/02/15 02:11 AM
13

While I agree with what you're saying, we must remember that the government and judges are now just implementing gyno-centric laws that women have fought for, for the last 30 years. Now that these norms are the law, women can just shrug and say, "It's not me, its the government, screwing men over." I see this as the same pattern as always, women first get men to support them and then throw them under the bus, blaming them for all the consequences.
/r/MGTOW03/02/15 01:56 AM
55

all the teachers were made explicitly aware of the "situation" - they all looked down on me, "would never have thought such a good boy would be so horrible to those nice girls" "what's wrong with him" "what a nasty piece of work" etc This is a serious problem with women especially in educational settings. They take their own personal victimhood and stories of all the guys who were supposedly assholes to them - and take it out on the young boys in their classes.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 12:29 AM
89

What is wrong with the world What is wrong is that women have taken over and they love nothing more than to see other people suffer.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:08 PM
6

Yes. The fundamental assumption is that women are testing whether you are worthy of her. It does not even occur to her, that she may not be worth the trouble.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 06:18 PM
3

I lay down the law and let her know I ain't putting up with that, and if she doesn't like that then I'm gone. This is called passing the shit test. Women shit test to know where your boundaries lie.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 06:16 PM
1

Agreed, that is why all women want to be "friends" with men. Men hardly want friendships with women.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 01:57 PM
3

Except that men do not consider any of those actions as "becoming friends". It is common courtesy and decency to be nice to people. Those people become acquaintances not friends. This is the big difference between men and women. Men have realistic expectations of other people. If you've just met someone, they are not going to change their life to accomodate you. Women jump into the "deep friendship" zone almost immediately with disastorous consequences. Within a few meetings they know all about …
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 01:54 PM
6

Shit tests help a woman establish where your boundaries are. The sole reason she is with you is because you fulfill her resource needs in some way. She wants to know how much she can get out of you, so she shit tests. She asks you to give up your time, your money, your friends, sometimes even your family to know at what point you put your foot down. Once she knows your limits, she know what she can extract from you. This is why it is very important to set high boundaries early on in a relationsh…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 12:24 PM
2

Again and again you see repeated the "misguided idea" that women were always lacking Charm. Women were taught to act charming. To say and do things to please a man, so that they could maintain his commitment. Women always bitched about their men in their own small groups, but never openly, as they could risk losing their man.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:46 AM
6

So I quickly listed off a half dozen fucking things that I had done in the year we have been in our home. Next time try this instead - "Honey if you don't remember what I do, then I'm not doing it." I told my wife that if she asked me to do anything more than once, I would not do it. Follow through once, and see how her behaviour improves.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:41 AM
2

Absolutely. Women keep lying to themselves. I have not met a single woman who has a basic decent relationship with another woman. The moment one woman is not there, her "friend" goes on bitching about her. Women maintain frenemies throughout their life.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:28 AM
–

Because it is?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:07 AM
–

From the dawn of civilization, women have always sat back and criticized men in their communities for everything that went wrong. It is sort of like an immune response system. It was always easier to say that the problem was because of the men, so that the men would go and do something about it. Without political power, the impact of this behaviour was limited. However now that women have got everyone pandering to their whims, they don't need to stop. Feminism is merely the political manifestati…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:03 AM
–

discriminated against joining the frat parties because of your gender I agree with what you are saying, but to be real - not getting invited to a party is not discrimination. Discrimination is if you are held back economically or politically. If women want to associate with men socially, they can host the parties and I'm sure men will turn up.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:58 AM
7

This is really simple to answer. For men the world is their playground. A man can do what he enjoys and can control his destiny. He really only seeks out a woman for his biological sex drive. A woman needs a man for everything, both manual labour and emotional support. Men may have a small group of friends, but strong friendships. Women (since they try to make use of everyone) have a large group of frenemies and no real friendships.
/r/MGTOW29/01/15 04:34 PM
–

It's simply safer for men to separate themselves from woman in all ways. We're coming full circle here. This is exactly how society was structured previously. Men went about and did their own thing and interacted with women when it came time to build a family and settle down. Men did not want women in areas where they worked and played, because women transform everything into their victimhood. Society cannot move on, with women pulling everyone into their own personal fantasies of oppression. Th…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:26 PM
1

Once again, women need to be understood with compassion and help, while men need to be punished. Yes, this is how women see the world. This is how they have always seen the world - nothing new. In the past men could ignore their biased viewpoint, because they didn't have the political power they do today.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:55 PM
–

In society, if one group of people get a pass because of their gender, it is a problem for us all. But you knew that already, didn't you?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:32 PM
–

If anything, the sequencing of this outrage shows just how invisible men are ... to women. Men have accepted women are equal citizens, while women do not show the capacity to view men even as human beings.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 08:50 PM
13

Second rule is never stop hitting them till they are out. Otherwise they will get up and kick your ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 08:29 PM
4

Yes, there is nothing wrong with retaliation. A person is fully within their right to retaliate.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 08:28 PM
2

Men like this built civilization from the ground up, while the women stood back and watched. Now they say they are equal and could have done the same thing, but they never did.
/r/MGTOW27/01/15 02:37 PM
1

For me, the need to redefine words to forward your agenda demonstrates a thorough lack of intellectual rigor Yes, but when your support base is more comfortable being hysterical, rather that rationally thinking about something, this method is very effective. It has worked for the words "abuse", "rape", "oppression", etc.. It is a pattern of female communication - Step 1: agree that something is bad Step 2: use that word to describe everything you don't like Step 3: profit wallow in self pity
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:02 PM
6

The only sad part is that the women who start new waves of feminist bullshit are rarely the ones who have to pay for its consequences. It is always the subsequent generation of women who have it worst, and when they complain the older generation of women (who created the mess) point to the men and say - blame them.
/r/MGTOW27/01/15 12:26 PM
1

True. This actually becomes easier once you have kids. Then you realize that there is very little diffference in the way a child and woman acts out. The only difference is a child knows you're the adult and will finally relent when you put your foot down.
/r/askTRP26/01/15 08:52 PM
1

Unfortunately the truth is never tell them anything that they can use to relate to your life. Don't talk about your weaknesses or vulnerabilities and especially do not talk about successes of other people in your social circle. Someone at office got a promotion? Do not mention it, otherwise she will ask you why you didn't get that promotion. Remember women are not looking for the top 20% men. They are looking for the top man. Period. No one is good enough, if they think there is someone above yo…
/r/askTRP26/01/15 08:47 PM
11

The women who support this right now, keeping thinking that these women have committed crimes against a man, so they should be treated in a "sophisticated" way. When some other woman wrongs them, they will call for the death sentence for that woman.
/r/PussyPass26/01/15 08:24 PM
3

Women can murder their children or spouse and get away with it. Lying to the state is no big deal. After all, they did it to "protect the children".
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:02 PM
3

It's fairly Kafkaesque, all things considered. That's the exact point of these laws. The state cannot (yet) declare in law that men are wrong by default of their gender. Men may revolt seeing that law. So they make gender neutral laws knowing fully well that none of the laws will apply to women. A mojority of the women are in full agreement with this and don't see anything wrong with it.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:01 PM
2

It's even worse - it's like men and women are watching a movie, and for men it's silent, while women can only hear what's happening This is one of the most profoundly accurate ways, I've heard someone describe this. <slow clap>
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 01:49 PM
2

Yes, unfortunately, I had finished the job and then heard her saying that.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 01:47 PM
11

Exactly, Japanese women have access to sperm banks. So why not force the women to get pregnant and have children.
/r/MGTOW26/01/15 12:06 PM
18

One of the best comments on that article. They are basically telling the guys "Hey, if you don't knock them up, we are going to take half your shit anyways".
/r/MGTOW26/01/15 12:05 PM
4

It's pretty common for neighbors to shovel each other's snow if they already started before them. I've been shovelling snow for years and I sometimes do my neighbours driveway. My neighbours have never once asked me to do it for them. That would just sounds incredulous if one of my neighbours asked me to do their driveway for them with no good reason. You would never ask your neighbours to take out your trash, just because you don't want to do it yourself. Same thing here.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 11:02 PM
29

As a man, I overall like doing things for women. I have done this also, till I realized that women see favours in a completely different way than men. As men, I think, we like doing something good for others because it builds friendship. With other men, though I don't expect immediate reciprocation, I know that if I help a guy out, one day if I need something I could rely on him. Women don't think that way. If you do something for them, they assume that they have already reciprocated by just say…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 10:53 PM
1

She was "let down" by the SOTU Clearly she was raped by the men at the SOTU. She needs to carry another mattress in front of parliament.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:29 PM
1

Yes, I agree. If Obama applies this standard to others, he should have applied it to his staff.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 07:11 PM
1

Be very very careful about going down this road. They are working you over to get your sympathy and then your resources. This is second nature to most women. After hearing these women complain a number of times, your brain will try to search for some truth in what they are saying. You will start to feel sympathetic for them and then may feel the burden of making them happy in some way. They will suttly hint at what they want from you and you will feel pressurized to comply, hoping that their com…
/r/askTRP22/01/15 06:58 PM
–

Women aren't as great at negotiating as Men There's a reason for this. Men negotiate because they know that they have to pay the bills. Many women, even if they earn well, do not see themselves as the bread winners.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:55 AM
–

Actually to be fair, that statistic is as incorrect as the pay-gap study. They didn't check for equal jobs. They just added up the men and women and averaged their pay.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:53 AM
0

if you read women's blogs, many complain that having to work is an attrocity and that life if meant to be enjoyed and not spent working. The data shows something that no one wants to admit openly - that the majority of women don't want to work hard on a career over many decades. Many women like to dabble in a job for a couple of years, give it up and then do something else which is easy.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:51 AM
16

I fail to see what the issue is. Men derive pleasure from it and men do not directly compensate a woman for their pleasure. Feminists want women to be in control of mens' sexual gratification. Women want to make the rules so that men need to defer to them for any sort of approval or contentment.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 07:42 PM
1

The short answer is - she was cruel to you because she had no one else to offload on. Since the dawn of civilization, women have had to live with other women and clandestinely compete with them for resources that were shared among the group. If the woman was too direct in competition, she could face the threat of male violence. So women evolved a passive aggressive way of dealing with each other. They have honed this behaviour so much, that they derive immense satisfaction when they successfully…
/r/askTRP20/01/15 04:05 AM
2

Are women evil because they choose differently? Are women unsuccessful because many of them have different ideas of success? Women act evil - because they choose and then blame men for their choices. Men have been running around trying to be fair and pander to their ridiculous demands for years. It has not made any difference.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:19 PM
1

Secondly, if marriage in India is an agreement to give someone half of everything you have/will ever have should they choose to leave at any point, then it can say so in the contract. I don't think there was any place in the world that defined marriage as giving half of everything they own to the spouse. This is a relatively new concept that the feminism of the 50s and 60s brought in. That is why men in so many older marriages were caught off-guard. Even now, when I talk to people who married 15…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:59 AM
3

Are women even allowed to own land in India? I know they aren't included in inheritance. Not sure if this is a serious question, but the answer is yes. Women can own anything a man can own. There are clear social reason why they were not included in the inheritance (past tense as this fact is changing): The property stays within the original family and the son is responsible to take care of the parents and that property. The wife (personally) receives access to her husband's property and wealth …
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:54 AM
3

The "MRM" will start treating men like they treat women when women also start acting the same way. Why don't women stop and help a guy change a flat tire. And while we're at it why treat adults and children differently. Why not treat every one like children? /s
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:30 PM
13

Yes, but this double speak / standard is nothing new for women. It infects every aspect of their lives. They ask for something and then blame the person who gives it to them. Woman says: I want to get married and have children. Women say : Men are oppressing us through marriage. Woman says: Men need to be chivalrous and do things for me. Women say : Men are misogynists. Woman says: I am going to say no, act coy and expect you to fight for me. Women say : Anything other than enthusiastic on-going…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 02:28 PM
2

2nd edit: for some epic lulz, see what happened to an all-female TV company. That is so typical of women. Even though the entire article describes how women cannot get along with each other and are petty, this lady still blames men, when they are around "Working in TV is notoriously difficult for women. There is a powerful old boys' network, robust glass ceiling and the majority of bosses are misogynistic males." Perhaps that glass ceiling exists because people who are neurotic and petty don't g…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 11:42 PM
3

This is why women want to work in places where there are mostly men. They don't want to be the single woman there, because there are not enough votes to get things in their favour, but they thrive in an environment that is around 30% female. That way there are enough men to do the actual work and they get to have enough focus on female prerogatives.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 11:27 PM
25

Watch 3:09 - 3:15 closely. While she is pretending to be traumatized, she quietly signals to the cameraman to go away and call someone. All her screaming is just an act. On a side note, I notice that the female cop did nothing to help. She should have been the one tackling the woman to the ground. Why does she get a pass to just stand around and let her male partner do all the work?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/15 03:22 PM
1

Next time she may burn down the house just to test him. Unfortunately women respond only to fear. If they are not afraid of a man, they do not respect him.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 02:18 PM
1

He knew what a shit test was from a mile away.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 02:14 PM
2

For women, calling the cops is like complaining to mom or dad. That is why most women do not comprehend why it is wrong to lie to the cops.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 01:50 PM
13

At which point they are all equally crazy. AWALT. All women think about destroying a man's career and life for the flimsiest of reasons. Some don't know whether the alternative is better, so they don't act on it. Here she is completely assured that he cannot retaliate against her because she can call 911 and say domestic violence.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 06:39 PM
0

Not if you're a woman. The cop will be investigated as to why he feels it necessary to press charges against a helpless victim. Every woman is backed up by hordes of SJWs who are dying to find their next target. Every man knows that they risk their job trying to take on a woman, even when she is clearly in the wrong. The only way to fight this, is for men to stand together against feminists, SJWs and utlimately any woman who supports them.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 12:17 AM
12

I see one key difference - male feminists are the only ones who truly believe the feminist rhetoric. Female feminists have no problems backtracking, using double speak and lies to just get what they want. They know that they don't really mean anything they say. After all most women are really after male attention, and they use complaining as a way of getting that attention. Male feminists have been duped into actually believing that there is any legitimacy in what female feminists complain about…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 03:02 PM
2

Actually, according to the documentary mentioned by /u/Zachar1a, less than 10% of the engineers are female and more than 90% of the nurses are female. When the nurses were asked why there are so few women in engineering, they sneered and asked "who would want such a boring job, talking to people is more exciting".
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 02:41 PM
2

Nationally, studies have suggested that the percentage of all rapes that are ever prosecuted may be as low as 5% That is because women scream rape for anything and everything and they want to be taken seriously even when everyone knows they are blatantly lying.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:41 PM
2

It seems to me that what these bills actually aim to do is remove the responsibility of reporting alleged assault from the accuser and transfer it to an institution. This way, a woman can file a report under the guise of speaking to a counselor and the university has to report it to the police. If the accusation is found to be false, the woman can say that she never initiated the report and the university can say that they are just following the law. No one can be held directly responsible for f…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:37 PM
10

but what are we actively doing to fix the situation. Isn't this our role as men, as leaders of our communities? This community - even by just talking about this stuff is doing a ton to fix the situation. Once there are enough men who read this and see the world for what it is, they will not allow women to get away with what they have done so far.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 12:05 AM
53

Women won't have a problem with that quota. A quota guarantees them a job without having to perform upto the levels required for the job.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:43 PM
3

Well, not agreeing to get married will now constitute emotional abuse.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/14 04:44 AM
14

Imagine how many guys are falsely accused and have no evidence to fight the assumption of guilt. Considering that accusing a man of violence/rape/assault seems to be the first reaction (and not an after-thought) when a woman feels threatened or let-down, it is likely that 99% of all accusations are false.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 05:16 PM
5

We've got to realize that the reason feminists and mainly women keeping saying this, is not because they believe it is rare, it is simply to railroad the other side into agreeing with them. That is why no amount of proof will ever be enough.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 05:14 PM
21

The trouble becomes how do we legally differentiate between a false accusation and a non conviction. That's easy - it is differentiated with evidence. A false accusation is where there is evidence to prove that she consented. For example - video, audio, emails, text messages, the accuser's diary etc. A non-conviction is simply the result of the accuser not able to prove that there was a rape. The accuser does not get penalized for it simply because there is no evidence.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 05:11 PM
3

You are right about the current state of society. The reason people in the past (say 100 years ago) were cautious about believing women, was that they had experienced the fact that women lie about rape/assault/ or anything for that matter, when they feel that they need to. Almost every society learned to be suspicious of women crying rape. To balance this out and to protect women from actually getting raped, society made rules asking women to be careful and teach men that it was their duty to pr…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 05:08 PM
5

Seems like the article was translated by Google
/r/TheRedPill19/11/14 05:03 PM
7

I never understood women's fascination with the male role. They never were fascinated with it. There were and are fascinated with the money and power than men have. They want the same without having to depend on a man or having to do the same work as a man. They are slowly achieving that goal - by making the government their provider.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 05:57 PM
14

imprisoned caregiver Women will never stop using children as human shields to protect themselves from responsibility.
/r/PussyPass07/11/14 03:40 PM
–

So if someone commits a terrorist act then they can also use this defence as they believe the stories the religion tells them? Only if they are a woman.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:39 AM
7

Yes - for a multiple of reasons Women on average spend more than their husbands. They both can be earning the same, but she spends her money on herself and he spends his money on the bills. Every women I have ever met has always said - "What is mine is mine, what is his is OURS". Women rarely save as much as men, so even if they make the same, when the enter marriage they rarely have the same assets. Once a woman has a child, she gets full custody in order to get the husband to pay.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 03:00 AM
2

The best part "I think the humiliation of the charge itself … would be punishment enough," defense attorney Aaron Linssen said. But yeah - he had more prior convictions. We don't know about her, because there are no details.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 07:43 PM
12

Nowadays, they can hop back on the CC and government welfare.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 07:34 PM
51

This is exactly what all women do when they decide they want to hook a guy. They only need to act for a few months, till he feels like he has found a companion and then show their true colors once they get a ring on their finger. AWALT - and they have the audacity to blame men when the women he marries turns out to be crazy.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 07:34 PM
27

Seems to be a normal case of - we are bored, let's do something to get attention. Women compete to be victims.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 11:35 PM
21

The mother didn't even look for money from him. She applied for welfare and the state tracked him down so they wouldn't have to pay her welfare. Feminist laws have outsourced the problem of finding a provider for a mother's children to the state. Women just apply for welfare and the government spends money on tracking down any guy they can pin for child support. Women now don`t even need to spend the time or effort to find out who the father of their children are, as long as they get a paycheck.
/r/PussyPass07/10/14 04:03 PM
–

This is true, but imagine what happens when these college educated women graduate and learn that the outside world has laws that do not allow them to convict a man so easily. We will see a 4th wave of feminist uprising complaining about how unfair the world is and politicians will start to bend the law to their favour.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:10 PM
12

You can't say that drunk women make bad decisions or that women can be wrong in anything. You can criticize men as much as you want - they're supposed to man up and take it.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 01:06 AM
–

He actually blamed her behaviour on her husband - "she must be under his spell" - were his exact words. I have no doubt these are scripted for the show and the only way women win is by getting men to stand up and attack other men. The show was careful to paint the female commentator as the one taking a balanced viewpoint and the male commentator as saying that it is a problem with men.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:08 PM
8

Actually, men do care about other men. We live in a society dominated by female values and women do not care at all about men. It is time, we as men, stand up and demand that women treat us fairly, or we won't reciprocate.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:01 PM
4

The problem with the contemporary definition is that the term 'equality' is so vague it can mean anything. Feminism from day 1 has always stood for equal rights without equal responsibilities. By that definition, feminism is not for equality, but for gathering privilege.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:17 PM
27

I remember the time when people said the same thing about rape charges - that no woman would ever risk her 'reputation' by claiming rape if it was not true.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/14 08:36 PM
–

Why don't we just get lawyers to draw a concent contract both parties sign with witnesses and it must be notarized? This is exactly what a "marriage" contract essentially is. Both parties confirm that they are signing it of their own free will. But feminists now say that marriage does not automatically mean consent. So even if there is a contract with witnesses - rape can take place.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:52 PM
17

In Canada, the boy scouts were forced to admit girls, but the girl-guide (aka girl scouts) refused to admit boys because "there needs to be safe spaces for girls".
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 10:40 PM
9

The enemies of the western world are its women.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 10:35 PM
10

The sad part is OP risks getting arrested if he calls the cops.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:57 AM
3

Who'd have thought the 'pinnacle of human civilization' would be completely devoid of rationality and logic. Almost every man 100 years ago, knew how stupid it was to give women any power in society. Women have proved them right.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 02:02 AM
1

I agree, but women will simply argue that a man cannot be abused and hence a woman can never be found guilty of bullying. They already argue this logic regarding domestic violence.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 01:53 AM
1

The definition of marriage has literally been re-written in the last 30 years. Most older folks did not sign up for this contact. It is only relatively recently (10 years) that men have begun to openly discuss the ills of marriage. Heck even now, try discussing this anywhere outside this sub and a few MRA sites and you'll face a battery of feminist diatribe.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 03:26 AM
2

Only when hardly a soul will collectively marry the female demographic in spite of their beauty and resultingly they're left to fend for themselves will the powers that be become incentivised to make the law more favourable to men. Unfortunately, this will not happen. Women will clamor for laws that increase taxes on single men and provide state child support and benefits to women; effectively still transferring money from men to women.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 06:48 PM
19

If 10% of your M&Ms were poisoned, would you eat them?
/r/PussyPass15/08/14 02:01 PM
3

you cant make this stuff up. Anyone else think that this woman could have made this up entirely for her 15 mins of attention?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 10:46 PM
–

Are you going to have a rape trial and not permit the woman to go on the stand and say he raped her? No, where did I say that a woman cannot accuse a man. However, the legal system today takes a woman's accusation as "corroborating" evidence. If a man is accused of theft, it is not sufficient for the person robbed to merely say that the accused robbed. There must be other corroborating evidence. In the case of rape, feminists have argued that it is impossible to provide evidence and hence no cor…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:49 PM
–

Well this is how women talk to each other constantly, so it is not at all out of the ordinary for them. Listen to a group of women talking and they usually are all taking passive-aggressive swings at each other.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:43 PM
1

There are women who - call themselves smart - when they are not. call themselves creative - when they are not. Of course they can be both smart and creative, if they work for it, but they are trying to shame men into accepting their lower achievements on par with everyone else.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:41 PM
4

So why care about how someone thinks you look? If you're smart and creative it will show up in the value you create. You won't need to depend on men to provide for you.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:38 PM
–

That is technically correct. Feminists have re-written laws to make an accusation by a women equivalent to evidence. Hence once a man is accused he has to prove his innocence. According to feminists and most women, they cannot lie. When they do, it is for a just cause, so it is still right.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:13 PM
1

You can if you are a woman. Let's take an example where women switch their logic at will - Men and women are equal and should not hit anyone. - ok If a spouse hits their spouse it is domestic violence - ok If a husband hits his wife he should go to jail - ok If a wife hits her husband she should go to j .... oh wait, there were reasons she did it. She shouldn't go to jail ... women are not meant for jail ... men are never in real danger and therefore cannot be victims ... etc. See, even when the…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 11:49 AM
8

The high profile cases are a few and far between and are only occurring because feminists have not figured out how to plug holes in the alimony logic. Once more than 10% of women start getting affected, I expect the law to change rapidly to protect women again.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 04:41 AM
2

Oddly enough, this would be a better rationale for alimony (the woman has spent her youth on the guy and is now damaged goods) than the usual reasons. This is exactly why men of the previous generations accepted the concept of alimony in cases where the man cheated on his wife. However this generation is getting hammered by women telling them that they are every bit as equal to and better than men and yet demanding alimony.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 04:22 AM
4

I think he explained it when he set the context saying that he has 3 daughters. This is the advice he would give to his daughters. As a father he wants the best for his kids.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 04:18 AM
12

It is very very easy to manipulate a pre-nup when the judge is in favour of the woman (90% of the time). My colleague got served divorce papers just before his early retirement and his wife wanted the house so her lawyer valued it at $300,000. A few weeks later, she changed her mind and said that she didn't want the house and told my colleague to keep it. Her lawyer then changed the valuation to $550,000 and asked him to split the value 50% with her. Meaning she wanted him to pay her $275,000 to…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 04:07 AM
9

The prenup also has to be structured "fairly"; it can't be overly one-sided And this is where the "fair" pre-nup is at a conflict with reality. In reality men bring 90% of the financial assets into a marriage and the women bring 70% of the debt. Fair means they take out what they brought in.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:58 AM
35

Being against marriage is cool and great if that's your thing. I don't think the OP is saying that marriage as an institution is flawed. OP is saying that the modern, feminist revised definition of marriage is flawed. Marriage 2.0 is a contract where a man commits his resources to a women at the risk of going to jail and she commits absolutely nothing (legally). This is not the way it used to be. So in the modern world, marriage is akin to selling yourself into slavery.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:55 AM
19

She can take off, but not throw you out of your own house and take half of your things. She will still get child support though, so she still comes out better than never getting married.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:51 AM
8

The evidence is the dozens of married men I know through work and social connections who have not been divorce raped and appear to have very intact, un-ruined lives ... who have not been divorce raped yet You really have no idea what men go through, because men do not talk about their hardships. They grin and bear it and learn to adapt and even enjoy their lives, in spite of having narcissistic/BPD/crazy spouses.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:49 AM
10

You do understand that if every man does this civilization will cease to exist? Yes, and it will be the fault of the women who brought this on. It seems that you are asking men to take the high road and voluntarily walk to the slaughter house. You must also understand that contrary to what is said on TRP, there actually are happily married people out there in the world. You probably interact with some of them every single day. I suspect the number is very few. Most men tolerate a lot of shit in …
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:45 AM
4

Contracts are the backbone of the legal system where men are concerned, but like all other aspects of the law, they get thrown out when women are involved. Courts will routinely discard a pre-nup if the terms are not favourable to the woman.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:40 AM
8

Not really, it won't. Wives will still get child support when there are children and CS is calculated as a % of income. Not as how much it should basically cost to raise a child.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:38 AM
37

This is why men should not get married. Marriage is a legal document where a man legally commits his resources to his wife and she commits nothing in return. There is literally nothing that men can legally hold their wives to in a marriage anymore.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 12:11 AM
5

It doesn't have to be complicated. I know what it feels like to think you are obligated to a women for either the situation she is in, or for something that happened (having a baby). A woman will walk out on you, the first chance she gets. You are not only signing away 50% of what you have, but in most cases 50% of what you will make in future. Please think about this rationally. Walking away sounds worst than it is. A wedding is only a big party that has been planned. Do not marry, when you hav…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 12:07 AM
4

If they hit you first, you can call the cops. Actually the police system was never intended to address stuff like this and it shouldn't. I suspect we would have to increase the police force 10x if they had to respond to every "someone slapped me" complaint.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 05:49 PM
8

that I can't even fathom why this is such a problem Women do not live in the real world. They have always lived in a fantasy world catered for them by men. For them, any reality is an inconvenience that has to be argued away. That is why they cannot accept responsibility for any action. Their line of reasoning is always - so what if I did something; that doesn't mean I should bear any consequence.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:08 PM
1

We're not talking about uneducated murders and thieves here. The deadbeat dad who goes to prison is likely to be a qualified professional who has lost their job or has been "assessed" to pay more than he earns and cannot make CS payments. Since they are low risk prisoners, the prison sets them up to work in their original field (accountant, lawyer, engineer, etc.). There is a prison bus that takes them to an office and brings them back at end of day. They work and don't get paid. Their only moti…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 03:30 PM
3

Imagine the scenario if these men finally get to go home and then hear their women say that actually they are the ones that have suffered and were oppressed by being made to do housework.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:53 AM
8

Why is it that I need to feel grateful to a man for ... This sentence can sum up the entire women's movement. "Why should I have any obligations just because I want to get something in return ... "
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 06:27 PM
4

don't have kids if you aren't able/willing to support the cost they entail if the relationship does not work out. Yes, and remember that CS is not assessed as how much money the kids need. It is a % of your income to equalize the perceived lifestyle between father and child (indirectly to the mom).
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 06:23 PM
11

This is exactly what the government/corporations want. Once enough men are in jail, they can use the prison's work programs to send a man to work and pay him almost nothing (2 cents/hr). The value of his work would be taken by the state/corporations and the wife gets a small amount in the way of CS for playing along and keeping him in jail.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 06:20 PM
-2

It will happen only if men start to recognize this as a pattern and stand up against it.
/r/PussyPass25/07/14 02:52 PM
–

So no reason, not to force women to do the same, then.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:45 PM
–

So all that a female has to do is disagree with the guy and she gets free reign to do whatever she wants without repercussion Yes, this is a prime example of female thinking and that is why men are waking up to understand that they will never agree with women on things like this.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:17 AM
1

The 'patriarchy' didn't enforce these thoughts on women. Other older women who were wiser from experience of life, passed on this advice to younger women. Stop trying to blame men for what women have done in the past. We find that women today, once past their 30s start saying the same things as all these other women of past years. Most of them want to settle down and find a provider in a husband. The only difference is that today, they are told that they don't have to feel obligated to their hus…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:55 AM
–

The reason that men have made all the advancements and inventions throughout history is because women weren't allowed in the workplace. The modern air-conditioned workplace is less than 60 years old. Nothing stopped women from setting up their own workplace and building a business in the past. Nothing - expect that pre-industrial revolution, manual labour was involved and women opted not to do it. Nothing stopped women from banding together to form a small army and then taking over from their ma…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:38 PM
1

Here's an idea of how common it is ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CNHwhHWPoQ This 'idea' (get pregnant to get your man to commit) is advice passed down from one generation of women to another. It may seem outlandish to you, but every woman sees absolutely nothing wrong with it.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 12:42 PM
1

it's too hard for this girl to go ahead and seriously talk to her bf about having a baby It's never about having a baby. It is always about getting a man to commit his financial resources to her for the long term. She cannot just go ahead and ask him to give her all his money, because he will most likely say no. So the only way is to trick him with having a baby. At least if my current boyfriend is the father he is less likely to leave his own child, and he will have enough income to support me …
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 12:35 PM
3

I agree with your sentiment, but I would like to point the real implications of this constant negative messaging in the media - divorce and family laws. These laws are literally written based on the premise that the father and husband is an idiot and the wife had to tolerate him throughout her marriage and hence she deserves to be compensated. This is why women can get so much sympathy in courts and men are expected to man-up and pay. Men do easily laugh at themselves and these sort of jokes and…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 09:46 PM
–

This is just another example of how thoroughly a woman can make up stories and lie. She even took police to one of the locations where she claimed a rape occurred.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:08 PM
5

Absolutely. We would not have this (feminist-created) problem to begin with if we followed common sense rule of law based on evidence.
/r/PussyPass15/07/14 03:21 AM
11

The law used to be able to spot this as reasonable doubt. Before feminism took root in society, complaints of rape were treated with suspicion, because of the she-said / he-said nature of it. Of course at that time, women had no incentive to mis-report rapes. The key argument of feminists and women in general, is that it is dis-respect and abuse if you don't take their word at face value. Feminism has literally elevated women into a deity, where they are considered pure and infallible.
/r/PussyPass14/07/14 11:36 PM
13

It is absurd and political correctness prevents anyone from openly criticizing her. They would be accused of being sexist, just because the prosecutor is a woman.
/r/PussyPass14/07/14 11:33 PM
21

The prosecutor is a woman and many women have openly said that it does not matter how many innocent men suffer, as long as they achieve the utopia where the number of rapes is 0.
/r/PussyPass14/07/14 11:31 PM
7

The only reason she has come forward now is to make herself feel better. Her statements don't indicate that she feels remorseful. Then, 'I will be free on the inside'.
/r/PussyPass14/07/14 11:29 PM
2

Why are you talking about men living on the streets? I'm not talking about hobos, I'm talking about things like mugging robbery and assault.. For this one particular type of violence, your statistic is correct. People here are arguing that there are other forms of violence that do not get reported. If suddenly every person, man or woman, would be charged with violence if they just hit another person, you would find probably 80-90% of the violence comes from women. The problem with your statistic…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:21 PM
–

She seems to have some serious mental health issues and a very pitiful life. Bad choices =/= mental health issues.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:11 PM
–

Men's lives are worth nothing *to women". Men developed modern civilization and quite a fair judicial system. Women came by and said - oh, that doesn't work for us. We need the system to validate our feelings and make us feel good.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:10 PM
23

It's perfectly possible that men's brains aren't as adapted for sitting still and learning from a teacher A male brain is very well adapted to doing that, that is why most programmers are men. The ability to sit and think in depth about a specific problem objectively is a strength of male psychology. However, education material is purposely tailored to make it difficult for boys by making them talk and study about abstract things like feelings and emotions. I've seen a Grade 1 math addition work…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 12:26 PM
2

Also, if you're claiming that women are actually detrimental to the pursuit of scientific advancement I read recently that feminists are pushing for women to get into Biology specifically, so that there is a 'balanced' view on the biological differences between men and women. Simply put, they are trying to undermine scientific study with a political ideology.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 12:19 PM
3

that women are bad at everything but oh ok they're good at college so that must be because anti-male oppression Well, since the college environment constantly promotes and supports girls, I would expect them to come out ahead, not because they are good at college, but because the criteria is tailored for women to excel at the expense of men. For example, things like the latest Google-supported push to get women into IT, by rewarding the professors for passing girls will make sure more girls get …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 12:14 PM
4

Do the worlds of business and medicine not only pay well, but also involve fair amounts of highly technical data, while being predominantly male fields For whatever reasons, women prefer and hence are motivated to do well in areas which require a lot of human interaction and communication.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 12:03 PM
1

Depends on the context. It is perfectly valid to assume people who are in dispute (in front of the courts) are lying. If you go to a prison and ask how many people are guilty, I bet 99% will say that they are not guilty. Is it absurd to assume that most of them are lying? I think not. In a certain context people have great motivation to lie. As experience has demonstrated, women have great motivation to lie to get revenge on someone they do not like or to avoid responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:50 PM
7

All verbal allegations are hard to prove. That's why they get thrown out of court. Trying going to a court and prove that, say, a restaurant verbally told you that you can eat for free. If you cannot prove it, you cannot convict someone - especially when that someone can only be from one group of people (men) and the accuser can only be from one group of people (women). You might as well argue that women should be allowed to carry guns and shoot dead any man who they feel makes them feel uncomfo…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:47 PM
27

"But when you look at the volume of sexual violence cases and the 1 per cent of cases that result in a conviction, there is something wrong with the way we are handling sexual violation cases." Or this statistic could indicate that 99% of cases reported are so weak that they are most likely false allegations.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:33 AM
0

... and the wife gives up her career to raise children and be a home maker This is one of the biggest lies that feminism has institutionalized. Women usually don't want jobs as long term careers. They don't give up their careers to raise children. They in fact "escape" the responsibility of working to get the benefit of being provided for. What women want is Age 20 - 30 : Work to have disposable money and enjoy life. Don't bother about saving for the future. Age 30 - 35 : Get married to a provid…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 02:50 PM
11

"We demand that you stand up and protect us from other men ... and when you are back from doing that ... you must sit down, STFU and listen to what we want you to do next" - feminists Male feminists are the only ones who are brainwashed enough to actual believe the lies of feminism.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:05 PM
16

This is pretty close to it ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa5kQbUl5_o
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 01:14 PM
18

No - because whining about women being victimized gets everything changed.
/r/PussyPass12/06/14 06:11 PM
–

This is exactly the point. If a women cannot have something she tries her best to destroy it. All successful men are their target.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:22 PM
0

Because there is no other evidence besides a verbal allegation.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:44 PM
–

I've seen a case of a husband (lawyer) being asked to pay 110% of his income as child support and alimony. The judge threw him in jail when he could not borrow any more to pay. family court finds it easier to side with a vengeful mother, because they are backed up by fanatical womens groups.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:03 PM
2

This bias is rooted in the dynamics of male-female relationships. Women view any form of male pleasure (even a guy relaxing on a couch in his own house) as a threat, on a very basic level, to her self preservation. Her logic is that she wants to see him work to provide for her. If he is not spending time doing that, it is a threat to her survival. This is a completely instinctive behaviour and is not based on whether she really needs anything from the man or not. Just seeing a man who she is in …
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:40 PM
3

People who manufacture allegations in their heads should be discouraged from coming forward. As a society, we have had enough of people coming forward a year later, thinking that "it might have been rape".
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:17 PM
5

There should be absolutely no way a person gets convicted for such a serious crime just based on the verbal testimony of another person. And as a society we need to recognize that mothers often will coerce and manipulate their children out of pure self preservation instincts. Even if there is absolutely no threat in her life, many mothers prepare for these situations just in case "he leaves her".
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:14 PM
0

Women need to keep men and society focused on providing for them. There is no better way that the 'damsel in distress' formula. If a women is offended or aggrieved, society will step up to help make it right for her. Unfortunately, there never is a way to make it right, because there is always the next thing she is a victim of.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:11 PM
2

At least in the last 30-40 years it seems like women have constantly looked to find the 'next big thing' to get offended and hysterical about. In the 80's it was "repressed child sex abuse memories", in the 90's every man became a pedophile and now it is "rape culture everywhere". I wish society could just revert to treating these outlandish claims with the suspicion they deserve.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:06 PM
3

No feminists want this pseudo-court system so that there is quick justice for the accuser without the hassle of going through an actual trial.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:44 PM
10

Somehow the article fails to mention that women also tend to spend more compared to their income so naturally they will end up poorer.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:34 PM
1

that's not something surprising or new, men should know that Men know that and women know that. It's just that women have lobbied for laws to criminalize men for malicious behaviour that women know they perpetrate. Women tend to rage when a man makes them feel bad, I always found that funny Men used to treat these tantrums as funny and to be ignored, till women demanded 'Respect' just for being women, which meant all this craziness had to be respected. We are now at a point where women cannot be…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:27 PM
2

Feminists did not create this bigotry, but they work hard to maintain it. All women in general create this bigotry. It starts when mothers teach their sons that girls are correct and boys are bad. Most men grow up believing that and then are stunned later in life to realize how evil women actually are.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:34 AM
4

. Second, if family peeps start smacking you around (verbally) because you 'destroyed Jen's relationship', Jen destroyed Jen's relationship. And Jen destroyed your relationship with her, too. Jen and "Aunt D" ... It is amazing how much malicious advice is passed down from older women in the family. I've seen this happen often.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:18 AM
2

This is a very tough situation to be in and you have a lot of courage to do the right thing.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:13 AM
5

No. A draft is needed when the country is facing a crisis and there are not enough people to fight to save the country. At that time, citizens have an obligation to defend the country that they live in. This responsibility has to be shared by all citizens and not only those who feel like it. You do not have a right to enjoy the safety and benefits a country offers you, by expecting others to sacrifice themselves for you. This is a new concept for women, because as long as humans have lived toget…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:42 PM
0

It does, though. If there was no false accusers - if people never lied about being raped, then it would make things easier for investigators. No it wouldn't, because an investigator has to assume that a human being is capable of lying. Why is this a problem only for rape? Women seem to need proof that they are actually capable of lying. It is inherently absurd to think that there is a certain group of people who would never lie. If people did not lie about anything it would be so much easier to …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:25 PM
2

It does, though. If there was no false accusers - if people never lied about being raped, then it would make things easier for investigators. No it wouldn't, because an investigator has to assume that a human being is capable of lying. This viewpoint is exactly the problem because it is inherently absurd to think that a certain group of people would never ever lie. Why is this a problem only for rape? Women seem to need proof that they are actually capable of lying. If people did not lie about a…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:22 PM
–

If I remember correctly, the Duke LaCrosse incident involved a stripper who was invited to a party, falsely accusing 3 players of rape.
/r/askTRP
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter