~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | Feminists go-to explanation for gender imbalances is misogyny. MRM explanation tends to revolve around evolution/history. | Feminism | Trad_LD_Guy | /r/MensRights | 29/09/24 11:33 AM |
| 22 | What makes us different | General | Trad_LD_Guy | /r/MensRights | 16/05/23 09:46 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | One guy has some theories... And awesome, going quite male-bashing.| A | B | C | D || <E Exhibits: A: “heroic” men that intervene for the better in most situations B: men that try repeatedly to be heroes but still have many “interventions” turn out poorly C: normal fucking regular ass dudes that care about people and have real feelings and struggle with not always doing the right thing like most humans but actively spend their life trying to be normal good men and just survive and support those they love. D: men that are in a bad place themselves and have allow… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/24 12:55 AM |
| 61 | Not all men but always a man…I kinda hate the phrase “not all men.” It should be “a very small percent of men” Or maybe “almost no men.” | /r/MensRights | 30/09/24 03:20 AM |
| 2 | Feminists go-to explanation for gender imbalances is misogyny. MRM explanation tends to revolve around evolution/history.This. You understand the meaning of my post well. Wish people could do that in general because the world would be a much better place. The fallacy, strictly speaking, is known as a slippery slope. I didn’t use that term in my post because more people tend to think of something else that is not actually what a slippery slope fallacy is. What I mean by slippery slope is more like this: you have a claim A=C you’re trying to prove. So you decide to prove A=B, and B=C, to form the logical circuit. No… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/24 02:41 AM |
| 2 | Feminists go-to explanation for gender imbalances is misogyny. MRM explanation tends to revolve around evolution/history.Feminist L | /r/MensRights | 30/09/24 02:30 AM |
| 1 | Feminists go-to explanation for gender imbalances is misogyny. MRM explanation tends to revolve around evolution/history.Actually, scientifically, it’s neither. Most gender roles (beyond nursing, which is just mammalian) come from division of labor based on the results of sexually dimorphism, which is engineered by female mate selection. Basically, women chose bigger and more violent men year to year, for millions of years, until in general men were biological very different and therefore more capable of things like hunting large prey, protecting the tribe, and fighting others. Gender roles post-civilization came … | /r/MensRights | 30/09/24 02:29 AM |
| 2 | Feminists go-to explanation for gender imbalances is misogyny. MRM explanation tends to revolve around evolution/history.Honestly I disagree. It’s wrong to label either as monolithically wrong without a way of coming to that conclusion. I think the most important thing in actually engaging the negative things in the world is having a solid reasoning behind why those things are negative. So yes, maybe misogyny or misandry can be bad. But it’s not bad because it’s misogyny or misandry. It’s bad for the reason that misogyny or misandry is bad, and the actually concept itself is merely a transitive of that evil. Shoul… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/24 05:04 PM |
| 7 | Feminists go-to explanation for gender imbalances is misogyny. MRM explanation tends to revolve around evolution/history.Your sarcasm is pointless. I did hit the nail on the head. Studied too much feminism to be able to come to a different conclusion. Some prestigious feminist writers even define critical feminism that way all on their own : “the process of analyzing the world through the lens of how patriarchy impacts it.” It’s just an assumption like any other | /r/MensRights | 29/09/24 12:09 PM |
| 2 | What makes us differentWell I don’t think it’s about republican/democrat. Unfortunately, gender issues do have a significant correlation to party lines, but it’s not absolute nor the rule. I’m personally very libertarian, and I have some pretty unorthodox beliefs about government. And yes, sometimes republicans do have rather questionable beliefs. For example, it used to be a pretty standard republican belief that same sex marriage should be illegal. However it was important to the legalization of same sex marriage th… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/23 10:53 PM |
| 3 | What makes us differentYeah but the fact you are aware of the possible bias speaks volumes. And although there’s no procurement of data right in front of us right now that provides irrefutable proof of the claim, I don’t doubt one could be made. Most subs incriminate themselves in their own rules: “no X identity allowed”, “no debate allowed”, “People of X ideology will be banned” etc. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/23 10:05 PM |
| 1 | Preparing Boys To Protect Themselves Against AbuseSad that in the medium article you linked, the main reason they thought it was wrong being unable to see women as predators was because it upheld the stereotypes that woman can’t be powerful or have a sexual appetite | /r/MensRights | 14/05/23 01:36 AM |
| 1 | PrivilegeCommenting to bookmark | /r/MensRights | 14/05/23 12:52 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter