TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Transmigratory Archive

View 10 posts and 4,391 comments by Transmigratory on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,391 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Tbh, it sounds like someone from FDS had their feelings hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 05:11 AM
1

Because they're mentally ill?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 08:04 AM
–

I think he meant to indicate that rose tinted glasses are a memetic or cognitio hazard. If you want to go all SCP explanation on it. Incidently, the sub could itself be a safe class SCP, of you think about it. Maybes Thaumel. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:42 PM
–

There is no need to oversaturise yourself with media and whatnot that implicates women have some superior level of human insight. Ultimately, they're still humans who are beholden to their biases. Guys like you in a sub like this would defo pounce on it based on your own biases/lamentations/insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:39 PM
2

At first, I thought, "jheez are a lot of the women here as wack as some of the inane guys here," then I saw the username and thought, "Of course, now the sweeping generalisations and thr distorted views of reality makes sense".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 07:22 PM
2

I'm seriously wondering if "dream girl" means the same thing to women in this sub as it does for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 06:59 AM
2

You're citing people on the Internet...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 02:39 AM
2

People with such views are better off not dating people who care about n count, not ruminating about why said standard is so horrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 02:38 AM
2

Wut
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 02:36 AM
0

Whats with the incelish themes nowadays, notably the hyper fixation on men and their faces?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 08:14 PM
1

It would help to see what trp actually says.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 08:13 PM
1

A typical redditor, ladies and gents. A PPDer at that. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:20 AM
1

And do you think reddit is the platform that have normal people's opinion? Or a special subset of people? I mean on that topic, TikTok and tumblr aren't very good sources either when it comes to this topic. We don't really know what arrangement they have, or what their work schedules are. She probably shared, or vented, depending on the circumstances. It does seem like overfitting since TikTok and tumblr aren't exactly the best sources of interrater reliability unless you're looking for people w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:46 PM
1

Hadn't considered that, and ngl its a very interesting way to look at things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:26 PM
5

Perhaps your happiness declined because you were do dependent on a man for happiness that its completely unfathomable to you that you could achieve happiness on your own? I mean you've seen those online who seem to attribute happiness solely to partners, they tend to associate with various coloured pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:25 PM
1

Don't you think that perhaps you could be overfitting the happenstance to what you read?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:23 PM
1

A long essay for really bad points. >Being partnered from an early age gives you a big leg up in life. You develop social skills, have a person who continuously boosts your self esteem, have reliable emotional support, and get to continually experience the joy of making someone else happy. Plus you even save money if you live together. If you needed a partner to develop social skills, and rely on someone to boost your self esteem and emotional support while focusing on making one person happy. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:51 PM
1

What came first, that happenstance or the rabbit hole?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 06:44 PM
2

Anyone who posts here and seriously subscribes to the nonsense that both sides hash out. People come from different walks of life.... but obviously look at things through a distorted prism hence they post here. Reddit is a cesspool for that, and this sub is particularly bad with gender politics (well, it probably rivals other foolish ones like TRP, xojane and the like). No one in real life wants to debate... actually if you look you'll find where people can discuss these things. Unless you've la…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 06:42 PM
0

I wanna know what triggered this reply, obviously some TRP post that rubbed someone the wrong way, I'd guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 02:02 PM
2

You're right. Men will need to accept women's standards, no matter how asinine they can get. A man gives some honest reasons for his preferences, there will be uproar... turn that to a meltdown if he has to tell a woman why not her specifically. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 01:44 PM
1

Do the incels purposely try to find reasons to complain/moan? >Mental stability is absolutely crucial for being a desirable man, I've read a decent amount of stories online of decent looking guys who can get women initially interested, but they immediately lose interest when they find out he's socially awkward or an aspie. You've read a decent amount of stories online FROM YOUR SELECT GROUP OF PEOPLE. The same group that, ironically would say those traits would be overcome if the guy is tall, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 01:26 PM
2

You're also a PPD regular, so you're hardly a representative or could be if we believe the stereotype that engineers are mostly shut ins. I would join you and the OP in listing my fancy occupation/industry alongside details of those in my network, but I know better than to assume one person's OPINIONS, especially in a sub like this means nothing when they seem to purport it as they found some insight. For example, I'd expect you to have attention to detail where I outlined how she conflated nice…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 12:30 PM
0

This is what it's come to, talking about bloody eye contact
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 12:45 AM
9

Yep. It comes across as the OP got triggered by some post about high n count women and tried to force an equivalent. Makes you wonder why many women here, and some guys, get overly touchy re high n count women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 12:44 AM
1

I.E. you had no valid response because you realise how obtuse you came across trying to defend TBP. 🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 12:41 AM
1

Aww shiiiiiiii, then I guess we should chuck most TBP and feminist arguments out for that very reason. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 05:59 PM
3

These CMVs make me laugh saying "Even handsome investment bankers don’t require this. I know because I’m living in NYC and engaged to one (29m)" so because ONE dude probably just told you something you think it represents a whole community. This is the same as saying the source is "trust me bro". The OP comes across as you didn't actually understand the points/stances you cited. For example saying no one cares about N count unless its super high.... what do you think is harped about? Unless simi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 05:18 PM
1

Or you're desperate for TBP to look like a joke XD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 03:11 PM
1

Most people can't stay together for just them, and marriage ending is very costly. So you'd imagine marriage with the notion of having kids would be better. That's if you are looking to see what he meant. The replies have other examples of people who got triggered by anything Jordan Peterson says.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 11:18 AM
1

Only if you really really want to seem PC and not make TBP views look as dumb as some TRP or incel views.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 11:16 AM
2

Read yes, but understanding what you read is another ballpark as many in this sub consistently demonstrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 11:15 AM
2

I guarantee if you look, you'll find that the men in here that struggle have some things in common i.e. belong to, or align with, a certain group that says unless you change certain biological factors (skin colour, height, the shape of their jaw, face etc -- go as comical as you'd like). That probably will automatically answer your question too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 11:13 AM
1

Drives the point home.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 07:25 PM
1

Read what I said again.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 02:20 PM
1

Why does it look like you read a section, or comment section of something and spend time thinking about this to the point you need to ask fellow overthinkers in this section about it. xD
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 01:43 PM
1

Ngl most of these "I'm not sure what..." posts scream "I can't rationalise things with my ridged model of how things work, help me rationalise!!" XD
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 11:36 AM
2

Imma wager the lack of specificity from the OP's part is due to a personalised situation... knowing this sub, the jury's out there if it's a fabrication.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:28 AM
1

Guys probably would if she's hot enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:25 AM
2

You'd be surprised what sort of men women with "high expectations" tend to end up with. More comically, the rationalising that comes with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:24 AM
2

In conclusion: a small number of people that barely interact with society feel they know what's what based on their wise echo chambers and endless thought experiments.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:21 AM
1

Physically or emotionally?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:18 AM
1

Let me guess "ONLI WHITES SAY DIS BC MY POKAI BENCHOD ASS I KNOWS ASIANS AND BROWNZ 3XPERIENXES BASSED ON THE 4 TIMES A MONTH I LEAVE THE HOUSE" If I told you my ethnicity right away. Then making fun of the comical belief system you're pushing won't be as fun given you're trying hard to rationalise the distorted views. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:17 AM
1

My guy cites a calc used commonly by the blackpill to make his point. XD It's like you guys don't even try to mask the disingenuity anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:14 AM
3

Maybe where you're based, again its probablethat youre omittinga lot of information. Though other redditors have pointed out anything you say is sus...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:12 AM
7

You came across as crazy... and you know what they say about crazy girls and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:04 AM
3

Right. Because you really don't know what he meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:02 AM
1

I don't tend to go out of my way to see a redditor's post history so as to judge their post as is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 05:02 AM
1

The way you guys overanalyse simple things. TRP literally just says be willing to leave, and that keeps their partner on their toes, so to speak, as they're less likely to cheat as they know you're willing to just walk. Compared to TBP who'll stay even if she has a full blown gang bang in front of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 03:16 PM
28

Not been asked out in 8 months despite telling us you're relatively attractive and exercise regularly? Defo other things you're not telling us.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 03:06 PM
1

Not a utopia, but a lot of incels make mountains out if holes due to having more fragile egos than the women claim have them. Did I hit too close to home calling the nonsense (yes nonsense) incels cry about make believe? Or should we really believe changing your skin colour will magically fix your problem, but them maybe you need to be a couple of inches taller, or make sure your eyes are shaped like the right nut, and that your nose has a particular shape, or that you need a certain type of hai…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:51 PM
5

You mean women won't say shit like "sorry I crashed, I'm such an asparagus- I mean taurus"?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:46 PM
2

"Many studies, but I'm too lazy to look for them" i.e. the studies can't be interpreted the way I'm presenting so I'm not gonna cite them ergo the source is "trust me bro".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:20 PM
1

I'm sure its something within the bubble you've chosen to keep yourself in. And people who actually go outside will see how weird you and your ilk's beliefs really here. Black women on the internet are the same as you lot crying about made up problems. You'll be very amazed when you actually go outside and listen/read things without a confirmation bias lens that fits the narrative of your bubble. Or, and its really obvious to everyone with even a modicum of common sense when it happens, when you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:18 PM
1

Hangs with sexually promiscuous women. Rather than exercise critical thinking and think "maybe this is how they think". they decide "OMG THIZ IS MODARRRN SOCIETYYYYY VIRGAIN SHARMMMING!!!!111" ​ XD
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:12 PM
1

You mean men who'll settle for someone, NOT their dream girl. Since you pretty much indicated their wife was any ol thing they can get. Which is it, the next shiny fuck doll or their dream girl? Seems you have no idea either, and have a bizarre sense of loyalty, too. Perhaps feeling that the average (PPD frequenting) woman may not be worthy of a successful man since you presupposed she wouldn't be his dream girl?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 12:28 PM
0

If I had a lapse in judgement and ended up having a wife that's anything like the women that frequent PPD, then hell yes I would leave my wife for my dream girl. Silly question. It comes across as you are preempting an answer to have something to complain about later. I mean asking if someone would leave their wife for their DREAM WOMAN? Kind of damning.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 11:57 AM
1

Spoken like someone who seems to focus on female circles only and is hard bent on convincing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 11:43 AM
1

Or the Asians and brown guys that have the time to bitch on the internet convince themselves they have something to bitch about. Like every other group that finds some reason to think they're unique in some way. Shit doesn't come thin air, but that subset (that post on reddit) doesn't do themselves any favors by abiding to incel/blackpill content like religious zealots. Though, it is beneficial for Asian and brown guys who don't want to act like they simultaneously have a stick up their ass and …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 11:33 AM
1

A lot of people in PPD cite "evidence," yet when you look at said evidence whenever it is provided and the redditor's interpretation, you can't help but question the effectivness of the education system.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 11:37 PM
1

Yeah, he's a dickhead for making some valid points you evidently didn't understand. 🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 11:35 PM
1

Sums up most of these Dunning-Krugers who masquerade as experts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 11:34 PM
1

Every conjecture you passed on as fact. Going by the history of this sub, your ilk, and how you framed your OP, I'm going to hazard a guess and say you very likely didn't comprehend the studies you claim to understand or allegedly found to support your assertion. Perhaps a subset do... which happens to be one you identify with. I assume it's easier to console yourself with some incel community assertions than to genuinely reflect. But then again, you'd make it easier for South Asians and Indians…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 11:16 PM
1

Now incels that don't interact with the community are lowkey asking PPD what women they should target (on OLD appa) lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 11:09 PM
1

What the study says vs. what some of the nuts here interpret.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 11:07 PM
1

It's generally how you speak and conduct yourself. Most who change their appearance fail to realise that when they feel more attractive, they don't present themselves as creepy or obnoxious. Of you're unfit, but can speak elegance. You'll still get similar replies because here's the uncomfortable truth many guys don't know, especially many on PPD/reddit who barely leave home: most guys can not talk properly. You'd get second-hand embarrassment hearing many guys chatting up women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:10 AM
1

Okay Kevin, if you go with that idea
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:04 AM
1

Your hobbies probably aren't that interesting if you didn't mention them. You don't need to engage in extravagant activities to be interesting. Being blunt, you're probably just not interesting. Even the way you present yourself now, you come across like an emotional buzzkill. What so-called high value woman would see herself enjoying her time with you when you're seemingly passionate about fuckall? Generally, in big cities girls wanna have fun. As shit as it is, societal norms ate such that we …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 07:02 AM
1

Both mean dysfunctional relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:49 AM
3

The incel posts don't even try to conceal themselves. Guess the mods realised that they need activity lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:48 AM
1

Not to be mistaken for being a doormat or compromising your principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:46 AM
10

Some of the things you people spend your time thinking about....
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:45 AM
1

Sorry to burst your bubble, outside your echo chamber, the incels here, and the angry reds here, in the grand scheme of things they probably don't give a shit. They likely react to get it out of their system so they can do better with the next lot. You're not that special that your lived experience would provide special insight just because you prefer how it makes you feel and how it would bug certain subgroups in this sub. It requires real humility and perspective to view situations outside an …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 06:41 AM
2

Actually, it should make it easier to stand out unless you're sending creepy messages, or you're just not as smooth as you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 11:30 PM
1

Unless they're numpties like some of the obvious bittercels and mad women you'll see in this sub, you won't spot them easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 11:09 PM
1

The logical reason is probably simpler than your over analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 11:08 PM
1

We should play a game: what did X redditor read that triggered them to make a whole new thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 11:07 PM
2

For certain posters, it is easy to get to the 20 ballpark or head towards that path. Stop thinking like an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 11:05 PM
2

Again, that outs your limited experience. They don't need "another group of women in their back pocket." They literally look for another group, for all you know the group they reacted badly to were a practice, or warm up group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:00 PM
1

Nope, because people are complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:52 PM
5

Jesus Christ, always the Asians or Brown dudes moaning. Makes you feel for the Asian and Brown dudes that put in the work and see these, knowing others could expect them to think the same. Though make it easier for the ones who think like "normal" people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:51 PM
1

You guys come up with weird crackpot theories every so often, and others here, female posters are t any better, eat it all up and treat them like they're credible. Guess the stereotypes about those who engage in gender politics has some truth. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:43 PM
-2

You proved yourself wrong by the fact that you've made many unfounded claims without actually trying at all. Instead, you circle jerk with like-minded people trying to validate your beliefs without any intention to try to challenge them. Now that's your right. But you needn't expect much sympathy when you're consciously disqualifying yourself because you're choosing to align with some of the dregs of the manosphere. You'd probably require genuine help like therapy depending on how deeply ingrain…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:39 PM
5

Your experience isn't universal, nor can you readily claim what other people outside the subs you interact with know or not. Compiling them all, that's still a very small ass sample make a bold assertion of what most men know, considering only certain types of men gravitate to those subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:34 PM
0

Well, there are brown dudes like this, and the fotb types who try to pull stalker style like life is a Bollywood film. It makes it easier for brown guys who act "normal" (read: not with weird hang-ups) since it defies expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:31 PM
1

Sounds more like incel cope and that you haven't spoken or interacted with society enough except select incel communities online, to be brutally honest with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:28 PM
11

The fact that your sample is PPD and similar is already indicative that you're unaware of what most guys know. Interestingly, yet ironically, the definition of good sex you are pushing does signal that you could be in the dark about what makes good sex. Perhaps you found one thing that works for one person (knowing this sub, probably something you read or watched) and probably assumed you discovered the proverbial silver bullet that "most guys" haven't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 07:23 PM
36

My guess is that you probably got irked by some guys on the Internet and want to evoke a reaction. Most older guys probably don't give a shit. If you or your friends (probably a niche group if you'd go out of your way to post an essay on PPD to psint a version of events that allegedlyhappened) didn't go for then, they'd probably find someone else that would. The thing with many of you here is that you think your lived experiences and thought experiments encompass some universal truths and can't …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 05:01 PM
3

Less baggage to deal with. In other words, not as much complications or shit you'd deal with from older women because of issues they experienced with guys you never met. Also, younger women are likely to be more open to more experiences (sexually too) compared to older who may be closed off based on prior experiences. So the notion goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:54 PM
1

I bet what women have in mind when they think of dad bod and fat compared to you, your ilk, and a few who go into this subset of gender politics have in mind radical differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:51 PM
1

It seems that's what he's gunning for. Men who do what's right yet fail. But it seems like he wants to push the incel LMS rhetoric; that it doesn't matter because LMS ultimately determined make success with women. In short: the OP's question appeared to have an agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 01:18 PM
1

Focus on themselves, and in doing so, the women will come. Seems that irked you enough for you yo misrepresent their point. I'm up for making fun of silly things they come out with, but at least be accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 08:57 AM
1

For people in this sub, probably as you lot tend to fixate on the juvenile elements of it. Needs fo factor in foe the rest without the same hang ups.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 08:56 AM
1

Either a woman who thinks women are life's protagonists, or a guy/simp trying hard to get in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 08:54 AM
1

Or just accept that most of the passionate and emotional people here that don't argue well asked talking outta their arse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 08:52 AM
1

Some things are a no brainer when you younger when younger when you deal with audiences with limited knowledge like high school and college kids. Top tier will be relative depending on societal norms and to the social setting at the time. But as you reach to more mentally mature audiences, basically those who think about dating/mate selection beyond a juvenile perspective (the high school/college way of seeing it), then it doesn't become as black and white as you see it. Most people teeter betwi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:05 AM
1

Generally, you'd expect you'd listen to sexually successful men over women. Unless you know, it'll get you arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:00 AM
2

Hate to say it, but they tend to feel the strongest unless they're in one... people outside this group tend to have strong ties with a "bitter older woman", you'll find.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:57 AM
1

I mean the fact he changed approach with you and then managed to succeed would indicate the prior approach would be the wrong approach rather than the right one, no? You're answering the OP's Q4W question, so I believe you're using your bf as an example of someone doing the right thing and still not succeeding with women (until he met you).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:56 AM
2

You're assuming dating, or human mate selection, will work exactly as it will in your thought experiment. And that every single woman is going to be like for like while factoring in variables only a subset of people on the Internet give a shit about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:53 AM
2

Now to quote one of my favourite YouTube fitness channela, PictureFit, "it depends". That's the best answer. Sure some leftist/progressive women probably fit that criteria. But, you can't take accountability away from the men who choose women like that, in the same way you'd want women to be accountable for choosing a guy who is clearly not LTR material.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:50 AM
3

One would think what you described, and what the OP would consider "all the right things" are diametrically opposed to what the "right things" are. In fact, from what you describe he was starting to change approach towards the direction of the "right things". Perhaps your anecdote contradicts the OP; a guy can't struggle if he actually does the right things? (Unless you're a blackpiller, then we know where they're gonna steer this.)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 03:34 AM
1

Sounds like you are a little annoyed with the saying. Tbh, the saying makes sense. Logically you would go with a good fisherman. But maybe you disliked the language or assumptions of women many fishermen use, which alas even "good, experienced" could have.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:38 PM
1

But I wouldn't say its why women don't post often. You'll see them post. Though, generally you'll find especially with these "internet fights", or vocal fights generally the sort of views women in this sub would express isn't something they'll keep pushing irl unless they knew people would back them up. Online, its tougher when its literally just you and if your self-esteem is rather fragile to rely on that support system you wouldn't have backing you up irl. You basically have the cesspool of 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:35 PM
1

You seem to be trying to say they get mad for not benefiting from the halo effect. And you probably have a subset of women in mind who probably were told they have these great attributes because of their looks but then flip when they're told by someone they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:30 PM
1

The message is good, but the only mistake you make is thinking women are uniquely attacked. Just because some incels are brave behind the keyboard and post more frequently doesn't mean women don't attack when questioned. Look at a board like 2XC, they'll probably complain about it elsewhere, and maybe you'll seldom get someone say something which attacks men, gets counterattacked then moans about being attacked. Gender politics is generally a cesspool when you see the sort of vocal actors in it,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:26 PM
2

If its brought up, then sure. Though it depends on the space. With other guys that don't have this weird thing of denouncing mental health they'll do it freely. And with women who are genuinely understanding, by that I mean those who won't limit their empathy to addressing mental health issues should the guy address any gender related issues while harbouring any dissenting views. Though, its a tough one since men are made to feel they've got to be tough and mental health is still made to seem li…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:21 PM
1

Depends on context. But its something both sides here overthink then get all dramatic over. Guys because they worry about being shit or someone being better (as the OP potentially counts). Women because they worry about not being sluts while wanting to be sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:15 PM
2

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 06:59 PM
1

You're triggered when you react like someone touched you in a bad place.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 08:41 AM
1

In your universe, sure
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 08:40 AM
2

Reading comprehension is still bad here. They refer to most women that have no chance at obtaining said men for commitment hence delusions. At least try not to look stupid when attacking a stance.😅
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 08:40 AM
0

They do. When they get as triggered as you, it is obvious the message hit too close to home.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 04:15 AM
1

If it were simply lies on the Internet you'd easy ignore it. However, the actual implication obviously bothers you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:56 AM
2

You must feel there is some truth that you agree with... but it's a truth you dislike. Hence you're bothered by people mentioning it. Clear from from the outset, tbh. But that requires attention to detail, I imagine
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 03:24 AM
5

There must be some truth in what they push for women like you yo get bothered by their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 03:44 PM
1

Who hurt you babe?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 10:32 PM
5

You have a type, I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 04:09 PM
1

It's a fact. You came in with a nonsensical assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 01:03 AM
1

You're confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 11:43 PM
1

Ah, so then that means you just intend to stick to your lie. That tells me everything I need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:10 PM
1

Of course you have. You disliked a dead man's views, so you lie by omission and reject evidence against it. Looks like you're someone who'll deny to defend their bubble with a series of "no I don't believe it"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:01 PM
1

You did. Read back.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:59 PM
1

You're welcome to lie to yourself and drag this out in hopes I'll believe your lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:57 PM
1

If you're willing to lie about a simple argument where I pointed it out but you still acted like a brick wall, then you have np qualms lying about what a diseased man said. You're definitely dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:56 PM
1

You lie by omission as its been pointed out many times. Obviously you weren't apathetic otherwise you wouldn't be hellbent on lying by omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:17 PM
1

Not how people in this sub work. Some lie about what a dead person who triggering them said, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 04:05 PM
1

You're lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 03:04 PM
2

A woman in this sub saw a topic, got triggered, replicated bastardised the concept of the original piece then reposted. As expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 06:01 AM
1

I see you for what you are: dishonest. You can keep pretending you're telling the truth, but people who actually investigate will know you're lying bc you disliked his opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:57 AM
1

I don't care if your partner is autistic. You should care you didn't comprehend what you replied to. Stay in your lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:55 AM
1

The hypothetical list would produce more accurate estimates.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 05:53 AM
2

Incorrect. You'd be aware women who otherwise wouldn't be interested are only interested for money. Which is okay if they bring something to the table... which they usually don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 11:46 AM
1

You're committed to pushing your narrative even to the point of being dishonest. Don't know why you hate honest black men like Kevin Samuels, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 12:01 PM
2

The Guardian is trusted WITHIN reason, depending on the author. Usually there's a heavy left bias unless you're willing to pay for the premium (much like the Independent). The unrestricted free stuff are shitty opinion pieces (for both the Guardian and Independent) are the ones you cited.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 06:55 AM
2

Anyone who is still supporting Heard after an independent jury found her guilty, has an agenda against Depp and/or men in general and shouldn't be listened to. So 2XC, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 06:47 AM
2

So what you're saying is Jack Sparrow beat Davy Jones, Blackbeard, and Mera!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 06:46 AM
2

Odd way to admit you don't know what'd going on. xD Most people, women included, side with Johnny. Except misandrist feminists and thirsty men who think they'll get their willy touched if they side with Amber.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 06:45 AM
1

How do you figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 06:42 AM
4

2XC seems to be having a meltdown over the Depp v Heard case haha. In RP terms, hamster nuke!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 04:35 AM
2

Someone's been looking at slutty confessions and its variants.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 04:34 AM
1

Interesting idea to apply to why people go for different types.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 04:33 AM
3

The Depp thread disappeared because Amber Heard suddenly lost the case? Sus.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 03:40 AM
1

And you're willfully ignoring the parts you want to push your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 03:38 AM
1

Ironically these women don't know the difference those and the average variants. That's why Kevin Samuel's triggered them so much, he popped their bubbles.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 07:25 PM
1

Wat
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 04:13 PM
2

It's still the same, man. Women are willing to look at factors other than looks - hence men's perpetual confusion. Men tend to have a hyperfocus on looks hence women's incessant moaning about beauty standards. You guys here overthink the dumbest things sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 03:03 AM
4

You'd need to ask him about specifics rather than speculating about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:24 PM
4

That's fine, but I didn't ask you. If I wanted a totally objective view I'd ask him too. Both parties always think the other is the worst person in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:17 PM
3

He brought the topic up and seemingly the women in PPD are getting defensive about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:16 PM
2

Who initiates matters in this context. Your last line seems like your justifying women initiating divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:04 PM
3

They do, I cited certain types of men in the pill sphere. And what you mean by "like".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 05:03 PM
4

The person online is male. Though, women initiate divorces?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:18 PM
1

Men do. Red pill it depends on the tribe, but never as a friend. Blackpill, no. Bluepill they hope their nice guy traits will eventually get them out of the friend zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:14 PM
2

You found out she had a gangbang with 5 guys bareback with her ex and his buddies in the past while you two were on the 2 week break but insisted she didn't you? Keep her! Wait wat?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:12 PM
3

Or the problem is with her... your tendency to blame the man is telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:09 PM
0

Get her a good psychiatrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:08 PM
1

With these blackpill guys tho, the line between the 2 is blurred.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 04:04 PM
1

That is an assumption you can logically deduce if you actually look around. However, if you simply came in to defend the damsels in distress hoping for some ,pieceofInternetass ass as compensation, you wouldn't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 11:42 AM
1

In his case, we need jumbo bags, the Costco editions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:52 PM
1

You've definitely not got reading comprehension. How could you? You merely came in to defend the damsels hoping to get some DM action!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:48 PM
1

We'll send him a treatment plan for incontinence, completely complementary.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:35 PM
1

Best part, the venue would contain carpets.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:31 PM
1

You know what, make it 4, include yourself and the other poster too. Then we send the recording to the carpet pisser out of spite.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:30 PM
1

A friend if you try too. Also, you might as well bring the one who got her heart broken by the carpet pisser too. The more the merrier.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:26 PM
1

Do your part
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:22 PM
1

Not that hard
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:21 PM
1

I wish i did
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:20 PM
1

You know what I meant. If guys aren't trying to show they're a better option than the carpet soaker, those ladies just aren't above average in looks. They're obviously not inundated with offers from men better than him. In fact, he's probably better comparatively speaking to who they can get which speaks volumes. The one thing you said that is agreeable is quality guys have options... options with women that are actually above average in attractiveness. Ones who know they do not need to settle f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 07:03 PM
1

I know, to you it makes no sense if I don't believe someone just because they're female! Your reason is fine, you explained this reason despite not being asked to. I simply said they're not above average in attractiveness as demonstrated by the fact that they could only generate interest from the trailer bro who urinates on carpets. I'm not sure why we're arguing, I simply said the women the OP noted very likely aren't above average in attractiveness. The women you cite, possibly the same as far…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:47 PM
2

Couldn't you argue a feminine dude would "feel" they could be any one of the others?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:42 PM
1

Ofc not, you just have poor reading comprehension and act like you're trying to protect their honour!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:34 PM
1

How do you know? That's right a female redditor that dislikes the male in question said so and that's good enough for you. Did they? You know this how and I'm going to assume it's through the same sus method... You don't know what picture I'm painting obviously. Looks matter more to men for the initial attraction, especially the "garbage" men. If these women were superbly attractive as you and the OP would have us believe, they'd easily get better quality men. Not a dude who pisses on the carpet…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:43 PM
0

Ah yes, a woman says they're attractive ergo they must be attractive, no questions asked. I see how you operate. Or, more simply they don't get more attractive men because they aren't attractive enough to do so since attraction is a major reason men go for women. Using your example, why they cheat too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:18 PM
1

You're probably doing that thing where you might be citing an outlier you know, or hope exists and assume its more common. That wouldn't be the case. If these women were as attractive as men have in mind, they'd have no issues finding better men. But it seems to be this strange view of attractiveness women have which may not line up hence what you may see as an attractive women who settled with garbage men for whatever rationalisation you settled on. Rather, they probably aren't that attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 04:04 PM
1

Maybe she's above average, maybe she's easy or comes across that way. Maybe she looks for someone who won't cheat, associates it with attractiveness or control. I can't speculate based on your singular experience as a gent speaking for a woman who allegedly hates the attention. Especially if you're going to presuppose that they're going to tell you everything due to the potential fear of judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:38 PM
1

Not from the men considered "high value". The point here is if below average guys like the dude being described can get the women I'm question, then obviously we're not generating interest from above average men. But the fact she chose him in the first place is also very indicative that he was the best option available. The best she could do, same with the other woman. The desire women have to support other women, especially against a male they dislike is also pretty strong hence to her (OP) the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:34 PM
1

Some still chose to don those antique hats to defend e-ladies. A "valid" question that was answered if you read the post properly instead of trying to impress some rando PPD women. Read the post you replied to again.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:28 PM
1

I'm going to give you a moment to realise what you just did.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:26 PM
1

Oh another fedora bro. Well, I'll take the bait. For the incel types, and most certainly the types who want to rush to protect the the egirls' honour and say m'lady, most likely. However, in your zeal to protect "teh kween" you failed to realised in these threads the PPD ladies always insert themselves and experience which doesn't not matter as the OP does not have that sort of person in mind. And no, these ladies aren't going to send you naughty images or DMs for jumping to protect their honour…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 12:43 PM
0

Of course they can, but the sort of women the OP has in mind aren't your anxious ridden women. They are likely to reply do maintain interest. Clearly you've kept to your limited circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 11:08 AM
-3

Ah you're one of those guys. I'll bite. The notion is to understand where the OP is coming from, not insert your experience which doesn't matter or add any value to the topic. Probably the same reason you think it's okay to jp to conclusions gun's blazing while donning your fedora. I simply pointed out the obvious. They are not part of the target audience. Anyone in the PPD long enough knows what women these guys have in mind, and it's not one that is too anxious to text bc they likely have lots…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:20 AM
1

Most good husbands taken by 35..... if we followed boomer/gen x trends sure. Clearly Millennials, particularly 90s Millennials onwards break the trend. Something ladies (and gents) of PPD and certain reddit sections would be aware of if they interacted with the community and looked into trends more than fictional hypergamous women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:12 AM
2

If she was attractive enough, she'd have revieved more attention/options, tbh, despite n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:06 AM
9

Gonna tell you now, chances are this going to be one of those cases where they didn't look above average if you saw them and its a case of someone talking up their friend and someone who made a similar choice to said friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:03 AM
-8

🤣 Fr tho, reddit women, especially those who care to engage in gender politics (and those in trash like 2XC) don't represent the norm especially the sort of women the RPs... Well nowadays the incels in this sub cry about. Needed to be said as they often speak about their experience as it has any significant insight or impact on the point being discussed. For instance, the girls these chaps talk cry about, they'll likely text asap and not do so bc they aren't interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:50 AM
1

In other words, you're overcompensating for your unusually small penis and it's made you antisocial and caused you to feel unlovable and friendless because of how it affected you. You blame women for how you feeling about your tint tool and therefore yourself hence all this... I mean it reached a point where you're copying fictional characters now. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 03:08 AM
1

Well, you're the one creating conspiracy theories against women because you have a small penis and seem to be intimately aware of the unlovable and friendless experience... did your small penis insecurity really make you antisocial?! 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:56 AM
1

So you agree that all this is one big reaction because you found out you've got an unusually small penis and you've now got small penis rage. Do we have Elliot Roger 2.0 here?!🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:40 AM
-4

No offence, but your typical reddit girl isn't representative of the sort of girls that most guys are going to pursuing. The OP likely has the pretty women that have multiple options in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:35 AM
1

Someone's getting angsty! Intellect isn't what you've tried to display in trying to overcompensate for that unusual small johnson you've got. 🤭 You've yet to disagree about you doing all this to over compensate for your small size... you trying to tell us something? 🤔 It was be odd if your unimpressive phallus made you want to isolate and caused you to feel that no one would care about your life which you're projecting on redditors. I'm sure there's help you can seek to help you accept your size…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:32 AM
1

It seems to work based on your reaction. Looks like this rant being a reaction to you overcompsating for something small is more true than I expected. 🤣 Your pseudo intellectual approach is cringe worthy, though I suppose due the Dunning-Kruger aspect of your approach you probably think you are onto something. You have similar replies to people. Did your small size really mess up with your identity that badly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 02:10 AM
1

Did you have this existential dread about yourself when you realised 99.9% of men's flaccid size are outsize your erect size? Your insults could be improve and not obviously suggest you worry about SPH. 🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:41 AM
1

You literally women can never truly consent that's hence people treated your stance as a joke. Choking, rough sex, anal, bare back things not legal DESPITE consenting .... my guy 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/ExRedPill30/05/22 01:38 AM
1

You're not the dude who said women can't really consent, so your point is....? That isn't a manosphere lie. It's a fear, but there's some truth re their fears. But not as exaggerated. I'm saying that fella who thinks women can't truly consent is quite silly and opens the door for that by his definition.
/r/ExRedPill30/05/22 01:33 AM
1

The difference you're acting mad because you've had an unsettling realisation after measuring your wee-wee.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:23 AM
1

Then stop acting like you're mad about having a small weiner.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 06:36 PM
1

Hopefully by then you'll be comfortable with your pecker.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 06:23 PM
0

By some farcical gender studies approach, perhaps. Coercion is different from a woman consenting then changing her mind well after she consented. You're just assuming men are all brutes that scare women, quite a silly way to look at it. Your definition of coercion is so broad its comical. Generally a yes means a yes if both parties are willing and able with no threats. You can introduce new variables to this, we were talking about your bizarre take on yes means no unless you make yes really mean…
/r/ExRedPill29/05/22 03:48 PM
1

I'll probably just laugh at another incel crackpot sharing conspiracy theories to overcompensate for areas he's lacking. Definitely add more value than you as demonstrated by not pushing conspiracy theories sounding like some angsty teen who just discovered political ideology... it is also probable you realised you were below average and are worried how it impacts dating.🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 03:40 PM
1

The amusing part is you fit the definition perfectly since the Dunning-Kruger effect means you're so incompetent, you don't realise how incompetent you are. Evidently you don't. But the real question is who or what made you feel that your willy is extremely below average?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 02:09 PM
1

She says yes but may mean no.... dude do you seriously hear yourself? 🤦‍♂️
/r/ExRedPill29/05/22 02:04 PM
1

Thank you for showing you can Google, but it doesn't have the implications you think it does. Predictions can intelligent and substantive or asinine and sound like they come from reclusive group from society. Yours is the latter. Your ilk will continue seeing things that aren't there due to feelings of inadequacy. For the women with chips on their shoulders that post here, usually things like mass, race, or things like this. Same with guys but focus on height and in this case probably strong cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 02:00 PM
1

You definitely have lots of ignorance like the rest of your ilk and their direct opposites. Roe doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 01:57 AM
2

The incel rumbling is coming for us!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 01:36 AM
1

Including the parts you willingly ignore because you dislike tge reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 01:33 AM
1

Pretty dumb prediction like you came with the small penis support group in South Park.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 01:32 AM
1

Who or what made your dick feel small?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:28 PM
2

Part of the RP that's cooked. Seldom shows itself .
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 09:33 AM
1

What you feel he said, because you like misinformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 07:14 AM
1

Or the Blackpillera aren't open to debate and just want to bitch and talk about perceived unfairness under the guise of good faith debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 08:41 PM
1

Hysteria confuses ladles 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 11:09 AM
1

It's funny because you demonstrate hysteria when I called a subset of women, not you hysterical. 🤣 Calm down, dear. Smile.🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 10:43 AM
1

You mean repeating yourself hoping your lies will be accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 10:32 AM
1

Yet you prefer lying by omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 10:02 AM
1

Correction, Men are interested in your looks. Other stuff decide if your looks alone are justifying longer term interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 09:36 AM
-2

Hol up! But Redpill how... oh yeah CH tricked himself into thinking prison time is a turn on.🤣
/r/ExRedPill27/05/22 04:36 AM
1

Apparent you can hence you like pushing your lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 12:59 AM
1

You can keep pretending if you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 12:32 AM
1

Wat
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 10:36 PM
-2

Seems sus tho
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 10:36 PM
-1

You mean conspiracy self pity theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 06:17 PM
1

While ignoring bits against your agenda. I'm sure the rest of red table top ladies agree with your lies by omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 06:16 PM
2

Not always. Only since the pandemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 02:30 PM
2

Depends where you hang out. Generally, they're not as uptight as Americans, especially not the social recluses in Reddit who haven't stepped outside in days, years... basically who self isolated well before COVID was a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 01:36 AM
1

Mod discretion for rule 9 is loose... then again it seems mod discretion doesn't matter unless its rule 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 12:19 AM
2

Its almost like you're telling these guys to go outside or something!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 11:46 PM
2

You're not really that special, deep, nor are you as intelligent, let alone as emotionally intelligent as you've tricked yourself into thinking you are. You are merely tolerated because you're pretty enough to stick in, or you make it easier to get pretty people to stick it in. Sad, but true. The smarter more people of my gender get, the more disillusioned we'll become. But, its more what we'll do with it. Most reds/blackpillers/bluepillers aren't as smart as they believe themselves to be, hence…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/22 11:45 PM
1

Consider the venue, these dipshits want status too. Probably some shit they saw on insta like some Arab dude flashing a shit ton of cash, or something they saw on TV. Remember, 99.99% of PPD haven't interacted with society.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 10:24 PM
1

Tradesmen always lose out to the best white collar industries like investment, tech... the big boys. Overtime isn't usually a given because bonuses/performance related pay usually will outstrip what that dude could. Make with his portfolio. That's not including that their portfolios could scale more exponentially because they can add more capital, and have access to networks to find better opportunities. Basically, do education right and it generally beats trade jobs. Even my mates' had parents …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 09:38 PM
3

STEM guys can get chicks, but not if they're like the dummies here. Re education... don't tell that to the overcompensating tradesmen that exaggerate how great the life is. 🤫
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 09:32 PM
1

Make a good case and you can not only squeeze your employers for a pretty good amount of compensation for unfair dismissal. But you'll also destroy that woman's life and label her as a man hater forever effectively killing her chances with high quality men... and men who hear one story and get sooooooooooooo scared thinking a woman's word holds some divine power. It's paranoid dude. It's not as bad as the reds think, as the black pills think, or certain fringe loonies want it to be. Otherwise wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 12:39 PM
2

It's literally paranoia if you'll let some stories like this scare you. For every story like this, there's another for a women getting caught out. MeToo has been losing some steam, not a lot but the fear is that the name power will tarnish it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 10:15 AM
2

Imo its not going to be the death of MeToo, just balance it i.e. women are less likely to be believes for simply being women. Maybe some more significant victories will be needed, but it'll get there. Vocal triggered feminists (fringe types) will hate it, bite they always find something to hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 06:05 AM
0

Ironically they could also do well with going outside too. Though, one posted nudes on a slut section (now deleted) and if that's anything to go by, they defo have nothing to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 05:57 AM
3

Lol paranoia and another PPDer that needs to go outside and interact with the community.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 05:41 AM
3

Tbh, this case high profile case helps drill in to people that women can be false accusers. MenToo is trending bc lets face it, MeToo was never for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 05:39 AM
1

And what you chose to ignore, but it's clear by now you'll not notice that since it contradicts your agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 09:35 PM
1

Another instance of confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:51 PM
1

You say this about something you didn't even read. Funny.🤣🤣🤣 Why is a list fir people that refuse free continuous treatment for BPD a bad idea? If they decline, they do as they wish, but people will know they're dealing people with certain tendencies. Perhaps for safety when they're in a certain radius, auto emails/texts should be sent to say an untreated BPD or someone who denied free BPD treatment is in their vicinity and they should check their updated local registry which continually updates…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:43 PM
1

Someone misses the point if the thread. Look elsewhere if you're going to discuss anything but BPD. Camps... this redditor....
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:34 PM
1

I did, and you didn't explain why it is relevant to this topic. Sounds like you just wanted to throw out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:29 PM
1

Oh yes, one of those people who think women can do no wrong and any minor feedback which doesn't involve adding modicum of validation or compliments means he was a bad, bad man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:28 PM
1

Sure there's more to it that you're probably not saying or willfully ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:27 PM
1

Explain
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:26 PM
1

BPD relevance, okay. You being AFAB... relevance in this case?🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:51 PM
1

I'm sure we can read and represent properly misrepresent because some feel personally attacked by Kev.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:49 PM
1

The same one who agreed that women that come to fight get what they come for and she saw no reason to insult him. You guys/girls really see something different. I think the RP might be onto something with the hamster.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:48 PM
1

Of course you think that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 10:04 AM
1

Boomer logic tho
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:48 AM
0

Of course. Men are simple. You'd just tell the guy to improve dome things or help him and done things will change.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:01 AM
0

Okay boomer
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:46 AM
1

Dat study
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:44 AM
1

Its easy to do what you're doing when you lie by omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 12:36 AM
1

Of course you didn't listen to him on full as demonstrated by your false narrative. But sure, we can pretend you're not lying by pretending you're ignoring the parts that contradict your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 10:14 PM
1

You hold onto that, then reject the other things he said which puts it into context because it doesn't fit your narrative. Whenever it's brought to your attention you act like it didn't register. Its fine to rub with your fabricated narrative... but it is fabricated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:12 PM
1

My guess these are the sort of women their audience wants to understand? Hint: look at how they look.
/r/ExRedPill19/05/22 06:38 PM
1

I don't see the harm when they are positive and motivational, tbh. Usually, so bloops here, and trash venues like FDS, and 2XC will hate on them because they uplift men and tell them women aren't special or queens.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 06:36 PM
1

You can lie and misrepresent the man said like a certain subset of people who dislike his content do if it helps you cope. You'd still be wrong though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 06:35 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:58 PM
2

Not so bad when I think about it. Harder with exceptionally hot girls when you listen to conventional BP advice. However, when incorporated beneficial elements of red and laughed at elements of the 2XC type crowd and went about things in a more relaxed/unconstrained way, it became easier. For example, I wouldn't be past making a hottie I've got rapport with cry or cause her emotional distress by demonstrating my willing to leave and that she's never going to hear from me again if I do, I'm gone …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 12:38 AM
1

Why a 5?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 03:09 AM
1

Depends, I've met different women that have very radically different views on this. Currently, I'm unmarried. Though, as far as bills and costs are concerned I wouldn't mind paying most, if not all of it. It would be nice if my partner would pay some or half- but its no biggie if she can't. The women I find tend to want to, though. Sometimes they even fight me about wanting to pay everything. If we pay half, then I'd prefer part of it to be used for a higher quality of life and another part for …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 03:04 AM
2

Weird flex, but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:46 AM
1

Darn, I missed out on the drama. I wanted to get in on this. :( Though, you may not have been able to handle the... kink direction it would've taken. >=]
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:46 AM
1

You could argue that. Its like one of those 2X posts where they'll ignore everything you say no matter what you present.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:40 AM
3

This is what normal people call fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 12:57 AM
1

Women here aren't representation of women in general population. They are representative of women with some weird chip on their shoulder.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 12:11 AM
3

Doubt it if that's what your take away was.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:09 PM
1

TRP isn't necessarily bad as it encourages going outside. But the other tribe of it does. Certain Bluepills almost always... Blackpill never go outside and try to disguise as red/blue with posts. If you've browsed long enough, you'll know who is for real and who is looking for validation for their preexisting thesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:01 PM
1

If you talk about women from certain circles sure. Apart from that, especially black pill ideas. It's a case of analysis paralysis stopping people from going outside and having social lives due to these belief systems they religiously abide by and reungorce with consistant thought experiments.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 01:53 PM
1

I'm saying there's a certain pill hyperfocused on that. Care to guess on which pill overvalued the importance of facial attractiveness? 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 01:49 PM
2

Overcomplicating again, just go outside and mingle.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 01:48 PM
3

Clearly you haven't going by yet hill you either ti due in, so to speak. Or, you viewed with a confirmation bias lens with is also possible. And in this instance we shall continue to laugh at viewers of those sites.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 01:47 PM
1

Anti trans thoughts? What I didn't know about this. Those ladies should have gone to 2X not FDS!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 08:08 AM
0

Or some of you are quite soft.... like 100% of people in 2XC. "Cowards" is a cute way of saying you can't handle certain banter. It's well established some people such as everyone in 2X can't take a joke bc they are hypersensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 08:00 AM
-2

Assuming if it's in the context mentioned. It's 2X, for God's sake. Probably some family banter unless you're in dome super sheltered.... oh wait.... I keep forgetting a lot of you are yanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:55 AM
2

Fuck buddies seems nice if she's hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:54 AM
3

Maybe from a PPD "grrr I'm triggered about what they say about single mom's so imma retaliate" view. Reality, probably not so much h.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:50 AM
1

Tell that to PPD ladies who insist this doesn't happen anymore. You gals need to decide whether it does or doesn't. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:48 AM
1

Sexual prime lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:47 AM
2

It's 2X, they're infamous for being overdramatic. I bet their dad's said something like looks slutty or one off hand comment. Then they overanalysed it and made some freaking drama over it. Legit, if these ladies use 10% of the effort they spent moaning about asinine issues they very likely exaggerated on something productive. They would achieve amazing things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:38 AM
1

Purge bc 2XC ladies tried to go to FDS?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:33 AM
1

If he'd like to discuss its fine, but ge specifically tagged it as CMV. Tho the facial attractiveness fixation is making me think of a certain color pill... associated with a colour associated with the Pokemon Zekrom. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:31 AM
4

My guy, you quite literally made a CMV thread while outright indicating you won't change your view because your lived experience and your helps you remain mentally healthy. That is fine, but why made the thread a CMV i.e. encourage your view to be challenged with the aim of changing your view?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:28 AM
1

But I share your sentiment, "their truth" is the truth haha
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:23 AM
1

Well, muscle mass plays a role too. You'd be surprised how attractive a dull face looks on a jacked bod. Ofc a pretty face looks better, but you get my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:22 AM
1

Indeed, makes me wonder where the OP does live. Or if they really lowered their standards to say only celebs can be 9 at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:19 AM
1

Unless you live the VP's life or know her intimately you can't really comment on how much her looks helped her in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:18 AM
1

10 is probably a 9 with your fetishes tbh. But it seems like a rationalisation to undermine looks to say 9s don't exist. Especially if you're trying to push them to celeb spheres.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:16 AM
1

You're referring to personality not status. But you're also undermining looks too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:14 AM
2

Think what you'd advice a kind male friend who isn't doing well with women. The opposite of that. You'd probably say be nice as one of the your tips, hence the opposite is be an asshole. The justification being the girl he wants and you will fawn and actively chase attractive assholes and not guys following the "non asshole advice". That should give you context when approaching the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:09 AM
2

Certified Narcissist Specialist from Reddit University. Depends if you're speaking about genuine narcissists or pop psy narcissist where 2XC types would call any man with a modicum of self esteem a narc. Are they rare? How do we know narcissist-machiavellianist men are uncommon? Maybe they're exceptional at being undetected. Especially the ones that also have psychopathy traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:05 AM
2

Rewards sociopathic behaviour wtf..... psychopathic you meant. There's a difference. Though arguably everything you outlined falls under dark triad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:00 AM
0

The fuck... you're talking status and somehow you bastardized the explanation the whole thing the OP asked about. It's simple as tougher guys get the girl. This section sometimes....
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 06:58 AM
2

Interesting points
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 06:53 AM
1

Seeing posts like this makes me take a break from PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:57 AM
33

People are complicated and the solution for 99.9% of men/women of PPD is to: Just Go Outside And Mingle
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:55 AM
3

Jesus Christ, you're literally going to go on repeat and ignore despite not properly watching the show like you know it seems. I'd retort, but clearly youve demonstrated you're not going to budge. Stick to that if you'd like- but its wrong. I don't feel like going back and forth. You're probs going to just copy snd paste this. 🤣 That's fine, but we have the right to laugh at every single one of those women as it is obviously a case of bubbles being burst. It comes across as readers of AskWomen, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:54 AM
1

Not what your posts suggest. Hence this whole cope and you throwing accusations and assumptions to feel better about feeling good about a black man's death. All he did was say black women on his show were being unrealistic, which they were. If you can't see that then real spaces aren't suitable and anywhere where real talk is supported is harmful to you. If you prefer delusional speak, go to red table talk or 2XC. I could argue you fit the profile of the people that were humbled or given a dose …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:46 AM
1

I'm not going to break it down for someone being purposely dishonest due to their obvious bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:36 AM
5

That was a reply to your question, it was in general, not you specifically. I saw his show a few times. He explicitly stated a number of times men handle feedback better. Why do you refuse to accept this? Ofc he'll focus on women, the moment he did, he went viral and people wrote about him. See reddit and twitter before you start pretending women are wonderful about this, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 10:24 PM
0

Right, not like your post told on you or anything. Say people can't tell you how they feel then says if I can't admit I'm a fan who can't admit his rhetoric was harmful, I'm part of the problem. Funny gal clearly didn't watch the show just wanted to celebrate a black man who told women, black women included, to manage their expectations. 🤣 Next you'll say an obese single mother with 7 kids is can realistically expect to get a man who earns 600k who is 6'2 and has no kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 10:19 PM
1

Please stop pretending you didn't understand my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 10:14 PM
4

I.E. some truth in what he said. He wasn't aiming to deceive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 10:14 PM
1

I can, yours are very obvious. His content isn't harmful just because you dislike certain truths. But it comes across as you're trying to find a way to celebrate a black man's death for humbling the black women who willingly phoned in his show.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 08:28 PM
1

You lying to me or to yourself? Women literally have to go out and say they are dtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 08:24 PM
4

I never asked about you. But the fact you needed to mention yourself and the trusted women in yourself is rather revealing. If you continued watching his shows, not cherry picked segments, you'd see he said it goes both ways and what I outlined: men take feedback better than women. Men enjoy watching because women cannot handle feedback. Love how you quote celebration like you're ignorant to women, notably black women, some itt, not being happy about it. It is sus. But it only illustrates his po…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 08:23 PM
4

Imo if people found him triggering to the point where they would celebrate his death, they should examine why those triggers exist. Is there some truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 08:18 PM
1

I can, but you're purposely being dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 08:16 PM
7

Like the tough love dad, is the impression I got. He did want to help, he used those noises when it was clear they weren't going to listen to him. He was also educating his male audience at the same time. Re stats iirc he'd literally Google or pull them up from wherever he'd get them from. He came from a single parent household and he even mentioned notions holding back the black community in his view. At the same time he also had people who weren't interested in changing whatever decisions and …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:01 PM
6

Be honest with yourself basically, with respect to society. You don't have to listen to him. But if his views are triggering, you'd need to ask why. Men got it too, oftentimes worse. But he became viral because women were unable to accept feedback. Think about that. Interestingly based on his feedback, he said based on his feedback men take feedback better than women. His experience would explain why. He goes viral when women have a meltdown over feedback. And women celebrate his death. Pretty s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 05:56 PM
15

He didn't shit on black women. He asked what they wanted then told them how realistic they were. Even Nicki Minaj didn't feel the need to cuss him out when he was being his normal self. He wasn't about being nice, it was about being real. Just because someone doesn't use PC language or Bloop/2XC style approaches, doesn't mean hate a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 05:50 PM
1

Like you were trying to tell strangers about their sentiment, but now you feel the need to say this when called out. Funny that. No harmful content existed. It's only harmful if you found it harmful enough to label people "cult followers" and celebrate/enjoy the death of a black man because you didn't like his content because you personally felt it was "harmful". For shame. You can't try to justify the moral high ground over celebrating the a man's death because one's feelings were hurt. Comes a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 05:46 PM
1

Read those convo again without trying to misrepresent and you'll see.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 05:42 PM
1

Desirability depends. But it's an achievement for men, not women. No matter the lies women like telling themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 05:41 PM
0

Identity causes a fuss too with new females so e.g. trans, cis, non-binary etc So R.A.P.I.E.R.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:52 PM
0

RAPE lol I'm nicking that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:32 PM
1

They think their truth counts for everyone other than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:31 PM
1

Odd one. Generally they are interested sexually. However, they are also interested in my status/income when it comes up in conversation which does trickle down to sexual interest when the conversation goes towards that direction. But personality seems to be the hook notably from creating an emotional connection... which seems to create a sexual connection. Though I find personality clashes can make intense sexual attractions or break them entirety. Or it could be we're just not the other's type …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:30 PM
1

You're literally happy a black man is dead bc you felt personally attacked by his content. That says a lot about the people like you enjoying his death, now backtracking saying you mean his content bc you see the optics. For shame. Happy about a man's death bc a safe space can be maintained. Despicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:10 PM
1

Feigning ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:07 PM
1

As I said for men, that's an achievement. Getting women to consent, especially these days with mad requirements. Women merely need to say they are open for business. It isn't the same, I'm afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:07 PM
4

Another example.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:05 PM
3

Overtly no, covertly, yes. Hence the strong reactions by some.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:04 PM
1

Define normal, what markers makes normal? What composes society? For all you know I could have the same heritage as you and not be neurotypical despite what my posts suggest. But thats PM message not public post message worthy.👀
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:03 PM
4

Narrow mind. You're thinking of one subset, I'm thinking broader. American, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 04:01 PM
4

I could disclose but I'd rather not have my socioeconomic status bias how my replies can be viewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:39 AM
3

Depends on the girl. In your case, were you very strong/defensive in your stance, quick to whip out your credentials etc -- I can't verify either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:36 AM
8

Point in case.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:33 AM
1

Interesting view and points. And with society taking mental health more seriously it is probable more people need therapy. What's classified as normal? Out of curiosity why would you hope I'm seeking therapy? I've endeavoured to keep any of my views out of this. I presented a hypothetical stance to gauge what the view would be in the context of the general moral panics the sub has.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:33 AM
3

That is the strangest date requested I've encountered, ngl.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:26 AM
1

Ofc not, you're happy a black man is dead bc you didn't like his content.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:25 AM
1

You're being obtuse here. It's obvious what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:24 AM
5

What they say to each other matters more than to you, who feels strongly about this topic. As for their actions, you've seen other rationales itt you've dismissed. Rather than trying to femsplain it, it could be a good shout to accept that male reasoning is something you will never understand. Especially when you've got a vested interest to push one narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:24 AM
3

Your truth with your anecdotes, of course. Not like we need to consider things like you feel strongly about the topic or they may need to tip toe around you as demonstrated by you trying to fight the experience of other gents here. Saying what you want... like you're doing now. You're not a gent, you're never going to be one and no man is ever going to level with you as a man. That's something you're going to have to accept. Internet, real life, it is what it is. Arguably on the Internet they ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:04 AM
0

Bit of an overreaction. It is merely a suggestion inspired by the case and some popular topics in the sub. Obviously you do not feel it is a good idea to have a list for BPD people whereby they stay on it if they decline treatment but go off it if they go on, and maintain treatment. Treatment which would be free.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 02:00 AM
4

Your truth you mean. Literal guys are telling you this and you're here trying to console yourself with whatever rationalisation you can come up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:56 AM
19

It amuses me how much the ladies of PPD try to console themselves into thinking high n counts don't matter. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:54 AM
5

Re man being the same as women here. Are you lying to us or to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:50 AM
0

Women that applies. For men, that's an achievement. It's usually very telling when women try to make it like-for-like.😉
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:48 AM
1

You seem to act like someone familiar with his content to be so passionate over a black man's death. Perhaps some people needed a reality check that their safe spaces didn't give them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:45 AM
1

Just because certain people dislike him doesn't make him trash. Shame on you. Guess we should have gone with All Lives Matter since BLM doesn't hold here. Oh I see, special case with its a black man that doesn't support a certain line of thinking. SMH.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:44 AM
1

Your questions which have nothing to do with the topic except tiu trivialising other mental illnesses for BPD and pretending there's a conspiracy against women? I don't think this topic is suitable for you considering how you've been debating in bad faith based on obvious bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 01:42 AM
1

Love comes into it one would say. But the reality is men are loved for the material value they bring, not for who they are. RP realises this and is mad about it while blackpill uses it to find hopelessness Other facets seek ways to improve while acknowledging women will are never going go unconditionally love men. The clash comes when bluepillers and women try to state women are capable of loving men unconditionally.
/r/ExRedPill15/05/22 01:39 AM
1

Someone's still trying hard while undermining a serious mental illness to gain sympathy for BPD. There are other markers. But you obviously didn't read properly. You gave your bias away in earlier posts. The fact you still can't discuss the topic and trivialise other disorders suggests that this topic may not be a good fit for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 09:16 AM
1

There's a clear bias if you're going to hold onto and push this dogmatic presupposition that your lived experience has some supreme value over others. Especially that in this scenario some is definitely taken advantage of. You genuinely don't believe that they fell for the other party. You believe trauma dumping ends the chat with a dose of being uncivil? Unsure about the particulars of your story. But your truth doesn't necessarily contradict the OP's observation. Despite the unique insights yo…
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 07:43 AM
-6

Jesus, man says perpetrator. You really do have a women are wonderful bias. I've lived through the same experience, and enough to recognise the women are wonderful bias. Most of the time women won't give the guy the time of day, if she's not a bit interesting or hasn't been successfully seduced in some way. RP/PUA go into different methods and reasons as to why it works. Blackpill too. The difference between a 3 is what you can do, or cannot do. There are no perpetrators taking advantage of vict…
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 07:29 AM
1

Yeah, the red pill seems angry about it. But it seems like we've simply got to acknowledge it. Though is it exclusively insecure women? You'll find to some extent all women consider themselves insecure to some extent. It's not that women with self respect would settle for "lesser men" unless they bring some value.
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 07:23 AM
-7

Or he's not. The women are wonderful bias in your post is strong.
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 07:18 AM
1

Still making assumptions instead of just admitting you jumped the gun. 🤣 Your intent was clear with your precise example. I cited a scenario inspired by the AH case, you couldn't handle it and failed to find an equivalent. Smile 😃 You've backtracked a few times and changed your approach. If you can't civilly approach the topic, then perhaps this isn't the discussion for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:16 AM
2

Most women, if not all women in this section would go for either I reckon.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 05:08 AM
2

Deets? Which gurus are selling men advice they aren't following themselves? Did you want to achieve the age gap result then something made you realise you can't? What made you feel "it should be common sense to everybody that the bigger the age gap, the bigger room for problems"? I'm asking about what led YOU to these conclusions not what you think everyone should believe.
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 05:06 AM
4

I'm keen to know what inspired the post. I know it's going to be juicy.
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 02:22 AM
4

I'm confused too. Comes across as the OP experienced something and it bothered them, or they saw someone/some people (irl or reddit) say something on the topic and it bothered them enough to make a post on it.
/r/ExRedPill12/05/22 02:21 AM
1

Men shouldn't despite what the PPD and 2XC, who represent the minority, believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 02:19 AM
1

Now you're applying value judgements after getting wrong a few times. You could just admit you got it wrong, and smile. :) Idc about that, you can read the OP and discuss the topic and scenario on hand instead of jumping the gun, stigmatising other mental illnesses after allegedly not going for a stereotypically male one for being that, assuming there was a misogynistic agenda among the others you ran with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 02:17 AM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:11 PM
1

Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:03 PM
1

You didn't read the OP and made a decision already. Did you already make your mind up?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:59 PM
1

I never said that, that's your lovely imagination at work again. It outlined a scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:58 PM
1

Treatment didn't help? Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:57 PM
1

Read what said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:56 PM
1

True, except if they defend views expressed in PPD, 2XC and similar then ofc they are
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:12 PM
1

Attention to detail, please. Easier to treat compared to certain other disorders. It so depends on the patient.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:10 PM
1

And US centred, naturally. Lol You can talk about it based on your political I inclinations, or assume it would pass. Either way, you're failing to grasp the idea of the OP. To discuss the registry in practical.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:09 PM
1

BS is one using time and effort to prove to the one person who tricked themselves into thinking AH doesn't have BPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:07 PM
1

It's obvious you turned it to a gender thing and why you're working hard to falsely equate it to other mental illness. You don't seem to think it holds itself. You've got a lovely imagination, I just said a statement. And I'm not twisting your argument, your argument is what it is. Of you genuinely believed in its severity you wouldn't be undermining other mental illnesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:05 PM
1

Wouldn't a list of sorts have helped? If AH wanted off such a list she would need to seek treatment. There would be different outcomes possibly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:01 PM
1

That's fine, but someone didn't read the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:59 AM
1

Not at all. But the scenario you said you'd decline doesn't appear realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:58 AM
1

Then I hope their and your positions allow you to keep your biases out of your profession. Sure, we're talking about a hypothetical scenario as you should have gathered by now. You could go into employment and treatment issies if you want, but looking at the context of the OP it's clear what context I'm aiming for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:42 AM
1

Likely you did... I hope you did otherwise you genuinely don't know how to compare disorders in terms of severity. So the former is giving you the benefit of the doubt. I am stating traits of BPD could be associated with it, so it is more efficient to list those who DECLINE free treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:36 AM
1

Misrepresenting...like you did... Someone's in a corner. You can assume it will pass, not that it auto fails bc of your existing biases. Autism a complicated disorder... and more complicated to treat. Borderline people get bc they MAY have been abused and can be treated more straightforwardly. You so didn't obviously Google male disorders haha and she goes and lists disorders more difficult to treat than Borderline, sheesh. I used hysteria as a description not as an official term. Though, I'm no…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:34 AM
1

Just BDP, see OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:21 AM
1

I'm going to make an executive judgement to go with the pros and the majority. Not the one single rando on reddit who didn't even have the attention to detail to notice his own link disproved his point. Any link you're given you'll contest, you'll have to deal with AH having borderline. You can saybshe doesn't, but you'd be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:20 AM
1

I never said it was a crime. You equated one personality disorder which is a lot easier to treat to a mental disorder which someone is born with and can be complicated to treat. You could have used a better example to strengthen your point. But you obviously googled the one most associated with males not realising its more complicated than BPD.🤣 I'm sure men's experiences with BPD women don't matter bc they are men, or Jonny Depp's. I mean you can try autism again, but it could help to see how i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:17 AM
1

And in a relationship context?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:11 AM
1

If there is a list and the guy does it, he knew fully what he got into.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:08 AM
1

Exactly. But, others would dismiss. Hence some sort of guide to know if you're going to deal with one helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:07 AM
0

100% I do. 😀 Just a suggestion, could save things like false accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:06 AM
0

Indeed, I see you doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:05 AM
1

It was clear what I meant hence people who deny treatment would be on the list. You could say that, but the topic here is about BPD women which was inspired by the AH case.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:04 AM
1

Not BPD people
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:01 AM
1

So you consciously watched his videos which made you felt degraded? You just told us why you're happy 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:01 AM
1

Well if you're going to compare it to a more establish disorder it is a joke. Your other false equivalences, depression, ADHD and anxiety have also been better researched too. Cluster Bs aren't on the same level. Seriously, but not equal. However, that doesn't change the fact that borderline people tend to be menaces who can wreck someone's life. AH is one of any examples. The fact you feel they're equal suggests you don't know mental disorders as well as you think you do... you mentioned women.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:00 AM
1

Antisocial iirc is complex. Pedophile puts you on a registry. BPD, if instances are linked to crimes like false accusations, it could help no? A way around being on a registry is accepting treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:51 AM
1

That is interesting. So does treatment help or is it something that is something that needs to be going on indefinitely?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:49 AM
1

I'm going to listen to a pro not some rando redditor who didn't even read his own article.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:47 AM
1

The first part... what the actual f--
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:46 AM
1

It matters, the only people that seem to be hating on him are the ones that felt personally attacked. I guess BLM didn't hold for all black lives...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:45 AM
1

I wanna hear how a simple suggestion is poorly thought out. Tinfoil vibes here. If they get treated and continue to get treated they are off the list. Someone didn't read. The other stuff is views you ran with in your head like fascist government, the pros making mistakes (you have no idea how BPD is treated lol) and the pivot of mental health pros just mistreating... the fuck...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:43 AM
1

I've got an understanding and proposed an idea. Idgaf about other PDs ITT, I singled out 1. You're bringing in the legal system and your views/biases about it. I threw a suggestion. Diagnosis would be logical if we notice these types cause disruption. A law could be passed with this in mind. The system would adapt, probably mandatory examinations with certain cases where repeat offenders are exhibiting traits. Same with armchair legal scholars, feminists and SJWs talking about why it isn't fair.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:38 AM
1

So you needn't please them and be honest!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:33 AM
1

He is, but probably your circles wouldn't understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:33 AM
1

Criminally insane can count too. Especially if you can link them to BDP tendencies, notably splitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:32 AM
1

A strawman is using a false equivalence e.g., assuming autism and borderline could be equated. Autism, yes. BDP, no. Ofc you didn't read the OP, if they decline treatment then they get listed. Borderlines tend to react well to treatment. I'm just arguing a stance based on what the OP asserts. I've not rendered a true opinion. You on the other hand seem to blanket serious mental illnesses which aren't straightforwardly treated like autism which has a spectrum to borderline, which itself reveals y…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:31 AM
1

You're equating autism to criminality. BPD involve various emotionally unstable markers along with impulse issues hence it also known as emotionally unstable disorder. The name "borderline" is quite telling too. Autism is a spectrum and more complicated than you're trying to simplify due to your very poor understanding of mental health. Shame on you on trying to stigmatise a group. Borderlines, unlike autistic people, are fully aware of what they do and can be treated for it. People with autism …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:24 AM
1

I probably know more than you do ;) If they choose not to have it and they CONSCIOUSLY decline treatment. Then nothing is wrong with a registry highlighting this crazy person is aware they are nuts and declined treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:29 AM
1

"it goes on and on", redditor doesn't see the irony and still doesn't see the irony re their emotions. xD
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:27 AM
0

You want to criminalise men who were sent to prison for DV tho, obviously you suggesting no one should be criminalized for who they are is horseshit. But this isn't criminalising them, this is more "watch out, this lady is a psycho who chose decline treatment".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:26 AM
1

If they keep isolated and avoid being a problem to anyone, mission accomplished, one would argue. I'm talking about BPD, so I dgf about the others ITT. BPD makes it more likely and it traits are present in life ruining menaces. Not a discrimination you're treating them; upon treatment they are no longer on the list. You really didn't read the OP. XD Tho, these female perpetrators likely have BPD... i.e. criminally insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:23 AM
-1

Ahh, another PPDer who thinks they know "manipulative strategy". How many Dunning-Krugers have I got to deal with today.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:21 AM
1

It does. Treat the emotional instability and the toxicity is solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:20 AM
0

He had some good points, tbh. Though, you'll find the black women of PPD, and the unrealistic women of PPD and the associated simps/orbiters obviously hate him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:18 AM
1

Oh wow, what a shocker. Some violent, some cunning-- all should be in a list if they refuse treatment. Tbh, taking the choice out of it and forcing them them on it and with the only way out of the list being treatment seems more sensible since these people will be treated.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:17 AM
1

With the dehumanizing aspect, this is made with wider society in mind to notify them that there are people consciously choosing to avoid treatment so interact at your own risk, though treatment would get them off the list. Re the second point, I get where you're coming from, and it is more complex than some of the other people I'm clearly winding up who are puffing up their chest and getting their knickers in a knot, but ITT the focus is assuming that instances of untreated BPD in women leads to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:15 AM
-1

Illustrates BPDs are a danger then, no? If they don't want to be on a registry, get treated and continue getting treated. It would be that simple. Did you read the OP, or saw some part you dislike then replied right away? I doubt the passion would be as intense if it the gender was different!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:10 AM
1

Some of them are probably mad because they thought they could get millionaires while sporting the muffin tops tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:08 AM
1

Indeed, an abused man or a man falsely accused would turn up, she would assumed guilt or say he asked for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:07 AM
1

Not deflecting, you seem like the type who would justify female on male violence because of the woman's hot. You're a sexist, its that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:07 AM
0

An exception could be made for fruity lunatics that are a danger to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:06 AM
0

Man, you must really hate autistic people for trying to associate something people really struggle with, usually males with hysterical women being hysterical women. Shame on you woman, shame on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:05 AM
2

The ICD calls it emotionally unstable, and pretty much diagnoses it the same. But you get it, splitting... the lunacy!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:04 AM
1

Only dumbass men who decide to go for these loonies knowing they are loonies. In your case, maybe therapy help. Or try men and look for stable women and ensure you earn enough income to invest in really, really stellar legal as and when you require their services.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:04 AM
1

You specified PDs because you didn't want to talk specifically about BPD. The only concrete thing we have is she's got BPD, and HPD. You can choose to believe she doesn't- but you'd be wrong. Obviously you didn't read your own article, so that's funny. You didn't get the reference, and you didn't have enough attention to detail to read your own article. Legal terminology is above your capability. Well, BPD makes her nuts like that and she's not trying to get treated... she could be loose on soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 10:02 AM
1

Idc if you have BPD, I made the suggestion based on the content or not. Read the OP for the reason or not, I honestly don't care for your feelings, just the points in the discussion. Regarding your actual points, what's to say untreated BPD women aren't horrible women who won't ruin men's lives if they aren't triggered and feel emotionally unstable one day. Depp lost a fuckin finger tip! Some men could probably lose lives, literally and figuratively depending if the woman goes with a false accus…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:58 AM
-1

Someone seems triggered. Some people here like to wear trauma and mental illnesses like they're collecting quirks... sort of like they are collecting tattoos and changing hair colours. They might even say BPD, some may even have them... wait, should I have said "TW" for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:54 AM
0

If those men consciously choose to play with fire, then they cannot say they weren't warned. Tho, you seem like a person that would gaslight abused men, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:52 AM
1

Refusing treatment which makes these ladies a danger to those around them could be considered criminal with all the harm and trauma they could cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:52 AM
1

Or if you read the title OP I asked if BPD women should be avoided which you feel your one single selective study addresses. Idgaf about the others you brought in and shame on you for trying to compare legit disorders to crazy women! BPD is just crazy, or emotionally unstable people... or shall we say criminally insane if we go by AH and her ilk.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:51 AM
1

If you're for criminal registries like ones for sex offenders, then ones for people BPD that refuse treatment should be one you support. Tho, I suspect you would be up for a DV list and not a BPD list because in your head the former is a man and I associated the latter with women... sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:48 AM
1

Someone feels a but too close to this topic!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:46 AM
1

A minority which can cause massive disruption, easy enough to list if they don't comply with treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:46 AM
1

BDP is full on toxicity which should be treated.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:45 AM
-5

Or cutting through the BS. What is red flaggy is you not being able to discuss this without keeping your emotions out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:45 AM
1

Like knowing when they have BPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:43 AM
2

PPD people who argue against KS guys usually do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:43 AM
0

When they have treatment, I'm sure they are A M A Z I N G. Luckily, once they are treated, and continue to be treated they would not be on the list -- but someone didn't read the OP. Ahhh, her bias comes out. "Why are we just calling out women with BPD ner ner ner" XD Read the OP and see why. Quite scummy of you to associate a legitimate disorder like autism with the emotional instability/BPD/false rape accusers, just because you dislike ladies like AH and the fact many men can point out the cra…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:42 AM
2

BPD tendencies tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:38 AM
1

You mean paradise. Having BPD means they're fucking nuts! I didn't talk about mentally ill people, you must not believe in BPD/emotionally unstable people for you to lump genuinely mentally ill people with these lunatics you heartless woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:33 AM
1

You're not the target audience, so you likely wouldn't. You're probably too simp, I reckon.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:32 AM
1

You sound like someone who would justify female on male abuse because men don't care bc sex is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:29 AM
1

If these menaces to society keep hidden and don't falsely accuse men of rape, abuse men, and generally leave the community in peace, it helps, no? If they do become a menace, then they are flagged unless they opt for treatment if you read the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:28 AM
1

I suppose you can please yourself by pleasing your reddit friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 09:23 AM
1

They'll probably get caught doing something dangerous or through a suicide attempt, or something flashy, whatever the dangerous BPDers do. I'm sure the sentiment would be different if I didn't cite "BPD women". haha
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:40 AM
-1

Unless it is determined this type is a threat to society!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:38 AM
1

Why would you like to be avoided? I understand it can be difficult to live with. But is treatment something you considered if you're not undergoing it? If you have/are, does it make any material difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:38 AM
1

Indeed! I'm sure you earned them PPD gal points!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:36 AM
1

You seem like someone who'd justify female on male violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:35 AM
0

Hence the need for a registry!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:35 AM
-2

In other words, BPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:34 AM
-1

You moved the goal post by saying people with PDs, I explicitly specified BPD in the OP, sir. Or perhaps you're not informed enough; the ICD manual refers to the BPD as emotionally unstable personality disorder has a similar criteria for diagnosing these emotionally unstable people. My man here is talking about moving goal posts and he's talking about mentally ill people in general instead of focusing on BPD/emotionally unstable people! Yeah yeah yeah, you can go with the group of people who thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:34 AM
-5

I'm sure you're probably misrepresenting what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:28 AM
-1

We don't know that! It is probable they have BPD tendencies. They won't be on the registry if they accept treatment for this menacing disorder, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:28 AM
-2

They aren't low value men, they're aspiring men. Its more tubby women and delusion women can now stay in their bubble. The mark he left will be strong!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:26 AM
1

They'll seek help so they can avoid going on the registry. If they get caught being a menace (like some of these BPD ladies tend to be!) and then refuse, the registry it is. More absurd if they deny the treatment if it is free!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:53 AM
0

Faking wouldn't help. What I had in mind is treatment would have to be administered with professionals present. They refuse, they're back on the list. The notion being that it is for everyone's safety to prevent the scenario you described, it could be disguised as appointments. They wouldn't have to tell their SOs about the nature of these appointments. Re the elaborations, BPD could exist alongside other mental disorders . I didn't make the HPD point well, but the idea is you could potentially …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:50 AM
-1

I suppose it could include men with how it is written. You said your first husband i.e. he isn't your husband anymore and he has BPD... could be something there. You could argue both could be diagnosed this way, but only Heard has been and well, we've seen the batshittery she's caused and many men can tell you what BPD women have done and gotten away with. In fact, you probably know the damages a BPD person can do- esp if they are untreated.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:44 AM
-1

You would consciously go for BPD women?!?!!?!?!?!?!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:41 AM
3

Not people with PDs, just the emotionally unstable, I mean BPD will be the one who would have to take treatment so they don't make other people's lives miserable. Arguably false accusers and a public case could be Amber Heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:40 AM
-2

So someone who falsely accuses people of rape several times due to their BPD tendencies is fine with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:39 AM
2

Or enforce treatment, no? I mean, they could go and, for argument's sake, make everyone else's lives more complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:38 AM
-1

Excluding the tangent: this redditor concludes BPD women must be avoided!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:37 AM
-5

50% tangent. So the part which actually answers the OP and with the cherry picked studies this redditor chose to use: BPD women must be avoided!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:37 AM
1

You're obviously trying to please some group. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:35 AM
9

Low value women, and women who were humbled. Our Godfather will be missed. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:33 AM
2

Let's see.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:32 AM
1

The energy!!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:31 AM
1

You don't hate them, but you're attracted to what you fear, it seems. I don't know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:31 AM
1

You're seeing it that way. I'm saying because of a specific subset of men you're attracted to, you've chosen to fears all men. That's your prerogative, but apart from a small subset of people, it looks silly. The strawman here is you misrepresenting the argument, or maybe you genuinely can't understand how silly it comes across? Ah, so women are fine to fear because they don't shoot baby batter? You've never had trauma with women because you lack that fear factor with them then? So now you don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:30 AM
1

I'm not. I just find it odd when people pleasing happens on the internet, that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:51 PM
1

MeToo become bigger than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:50 PM
1

Other way round it sounds like.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:16 AM
2

Depends on how seriously the social change is pushed tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:15 AM
1

If you want us, esp your reddit friends, to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:14 AM
1

Tbh, it seems good, but the effort to get there is... So much grinding.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:16 PM
3

As more of these come out, esp with someone like Amber Heard who used the movement. There's a reason why certain feminists are frazzing out and why the so called "mentoo" is trending and aiming to be distinct, and seemingly rejecting "metoo".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:15 PM
1

I know, so why pretending a super sexy hunk does nothing for you, lord knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:13 PM
1

Darn, you couldn't handle their energy!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:11 PM
1

Nothing, it will ebb and flow and so that there are always winners and losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:10 PM
1

Everyone has ulterior motives tbh. It can be bad though, depending on how you plan to go about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:09 PM
1

You know, I knew this would be Keven Samuels inspired before I even read the OP. I don't think you're close to what he's thinking of re the HMV lifestyle. Men who think they are tended to get humbled. You only just got into the 6 fig group, so you probably can't imagine what he means. Going by your description, you don't. To quality for his definition you need to: Earn at least $10K monthly Consistently earn that over 5 years Be accepted by a group of other HVM Have access to a fraternity type n…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:08 PM
1

You're probably living in the past. Those women will be laughed at these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:58 PM
1

I dunno, dudette, a pro said AH had 2 traits of 2 of the cluster B personality traits, not Johnny. That would've made news. Amber would've leaked the shit out of it if it was the case... but its just her. I get trying to be diplomatic, but we have to call it what it is. I guess Amber gives us a friendly reminder why Cluster Bs, notably HPDs and especially BPDs shouldn't be wedded... if bedded then you must not give them any deets that could be used to locate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:46 PM
1

I suppose a lot of the panic some of the feminists are having is that this will be used to harm the power "me too" and "cancelling" depending on how this goes. Potentially could pave way for legislation (for the US, at least) for people who attempt to cancel?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:42 PM
1

Let's see what that does, to a celeb that means a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:39 PM
3

Odd how people who say this never have example. Who are these "most men with power" that "also face no consequences"? Have your lot been alluding to the illuminati all this time when you were talking about "men in power", "white men in power, and "cis white males in power"?!?!?!?!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:38 PM
3

This case will make it easier for a "normal" guy, tbh. Shows women are capable of lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:36 PM
1

Or trying to keep up appearances on an anonymous internet board about a hypothetical scenario bc you're trying to maintain a facade? I suppose if you have some set of internet friends you want to maintain 'face' in front of, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:34 PM
1

Your trauma, of course, one of the words certain people use to try to shut down dialogue. You're attracted to men yet you fear them. You said it, not me. I just noted it seems "off" you generalised a whole gender based on some you consciously choose (poorly) that attracted you. That's like someone making a sweeping assumption about women based on certain interactions, or about a whole race based on some small interactions and based on some beliefs. Yes, men rape; women don't. Its men, we can run…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:32 PM
1

Apparently you do hence you're here trying to justify issues which are a you problem, not anyone else's. You don't hate men, of course. Just wary of men because certain men that turn you on "took advantage" and now "scare" you. :) I mean, I guess some men can see Amber Heard and many a handful of cases and related it to 1-2 things they personally or vicariously experienced and say their fear of women with certain issues (like BPD) isn't unfounded!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:27 PM
1

And correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 12:08 AM
0

Your fears are pretty dumb tbh. Your pick someone men and suddenly all men scare you. Go to an echo chamber like 2XC of you want people to agree with all females. Victim blame, ya right. I guess many of us did too when we believed Drpp incread, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 12:07 AM
0

And that gets you off, that fear dynamic. You're probably scared of men bc of the small selection you chose. I didn't tell you how you feel, I said you probably generalised over your own choices. Re your other stuff, you' need therpsy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 12:02 AM
1

Never said, but you're apparently you're defo w people pleaser.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:59 PM
2

I did, you were just shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:58 PM
1

You're very convincing, hun. I knew people pleasing was an issue among women, but this is ridiculous.🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:17 PM
1

Luckily I don't give a fuck about your feelings while you were trying to fish for sympathy or male people feel awkward! Get better with people, buddy!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:14 PM
-1

The obvious answer is your decision making skills with choosing men is just... shit. I mean rather than saying you're scared of men bc of blah blah blah, you can just say what most people except a small selection of people will be thinking. Men that seemingly have traits that l are unsuitable for a relationship with you turn you on. That's okay, and yes that means not all men. Just men you're attracted to! It's like guys, idiots like me, who somehow wind up with batshit women then suddenly sayin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:11 PM
2

You'd think these covert woe is me and incel/blackpill posts are from incels/blackpillers!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:07 PM
1

My hobbies don't help a consenting lady is right there. I take it as a challenge to try to seduce her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:05 PM
1

Yes, lass. Fucking a sexy as he'll stranger is gross to you. Dunno what people you're trying to please, but okay.🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:04 PM
1

No, it means you focus too much on gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:02 PM
1

Thank you... please post it there. I'm banned from there for having a penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:01 PM
2

I'm noticing a trend when certain posts, who say CMV but seem to have their M set but have cleverly circumvented some rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 05:05 AM
5

I'm not down voting you, I was going to kindly request that you stop downvoting me! Well this places gets 2XC visitors and Blackpillers, so who knows who is gunning for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 05:01 AM
8

If you go by 2XC who apparently couldn't over a dude so showed their misandry by blaming war on men!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:54 AM
10

All wars are about male drama queen?! 2XC 99% of the time never has a point, it's just where all the oversensitive women on reddit go because they'll be laughed at elsewhere. Let's go tell all the victims of war its just male drama bc some hypersensitive ladies said so! Not like there's any political, economical, or historical factors that we'd consider!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:11 AM
1

Where do we find more like you, seriously? 🥲 I've consistently gotten complaints that my sex drive is always on overdrive, or OTT, even for women who said they have a high libido. Sometimes I'll get the phone hung up and told its not a sex line. I view it as lots of excess energy that must go somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:07 AM
15

After you nut you aren't horny and you can see if you really like the woman or if you actually find her attractive. Though, if you made him cum hard, welcome your attempts at further non-sexual intimacy like cuddles (especially) or lots of kissing, and defo talking, when he can form words again. Only by my experience. Especially if it was a longer session that was tender/rough/mix.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:00 AM
0

I try not to, they get attached.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:55 AM
-5

Condoms wouldn't be used? Prefer women and are scared of men, why have sex with men at times if you're scared and wary of them? EDIT: did I expose a danger, or power dynamic loving kink that misandrists got triggered by or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:54 AM
0

Link to their site?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:51 AM
17

See some female centric subs. Reds are bad, incels are bad, FDS were bad, I thought let's check 2XC... a man allegedly called women dramatic and the women there were legitimately asserting ALL WARS are male drama. 🤣 The OP looks like a genius compared to them, a scholar.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:50 AM
1

It's civil, dude. I'm making assumptions based on what the user said which are frankly sexist to both men and women. The last part was a minor jab indicating where such views are normalised.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:46 AM
0

I wad blunt, the others were kind or would dodge the obvious points. That sort of overthinking fucks you up. Take care of that and you'll clear a significant mental obstruction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:45 AM
1

Depends how much they share, talk or let the lady talk about themselves... the last option works the best hence a interested lady may not know as he did a great thing by letting her talk about herself. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:42 AM
1

You not being approached makes sense with that in mind, though turning down a sexy, charming hunk? Sounds sus.🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:39 AM
0

Tbh, if you liked him enough to agree to a date, for some reason its doubtful you'd cancel purely on his age. Like I said, you don't need to people please on the internet, you're not going to expose your identity! Unless you don't get approached at all then a sexy hunk likely be someone you'd take a chance with, no? You could say you won't hook up- I dunno if you're trying to people please on the internet for some odd reason. You are allowed to have a libido, you know!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 10:23 PM
1

Depends on how much the guys get. If you're thinking the guys such as... let's say a relatable sample. 👀 Then you're right, they get partially. Otherwise most girls don't. Sadly, and I say this with genuine sadness in my heart, not every girl is a fucking hottie you wanna pound in the bedroom. Women get to choose, but so to men, my guy. If you're think men will choose any ol' poon then I think you're defo talking for a... relatable sample to yourself. 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 10:18 PM
5

She wants her safe space with her brightly coloured hair, quirky piercings and the mental health disorders she probably alleges like Gen Y and Z... as a Gen Y I have to say... I'm sorry for this. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 09:19 PM
1

Oh yes, and women 100% get the guys they only want.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 09:14 PM
0

At work, the start of a journey, an empty street, or something... so don't hit on someone in most venues except a bar because they are "likely to feel pressured to say yes". The things I read here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 09:03 PM
3

For some reason, I'd wager you were either very socially retarded (did some socially unacceptable things), did somethings wrong, came off creepy, weren't polite (probably came off intense or like a sex pest on a list), or whatever. You have to be good with people if you're going to be good with cold approaching. If you can't talk to people, in general, men included. Then don't expect to be this master cold approacher. Whomever you learnt cold approaching that you witness has a high hit rate, I c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 09:01 PM
-1

Hun, you're aware that you don't have to people please on the internet, right? Say with confidence what you mean what you mean when you say "not terribly bad looking"- a sexy hunk whose clothes you'd like to rip off! 👀 Your approximate age, I'm not sure I fully buy that. I can't see you carding every guy who approaches you. I'd say every guy who looks roughly your age; you may very well hook up with a who is a lot older than you who happens to look around your age.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 08:58 PM
3

Did you just read your question? He'll find out she's not attracted AFTER he approaches!😅 Why would he make that assumption in the first place? Well, there are certain pills which assume these things, they aren't blue, nor are they red, and they believe things are hopeless, like a blackhole.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 08:53 PM
2

Maybe become attractive?😅
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 08:50 PM
1

I promise you, if 98%-100% of the vocal women on PPD, or certain subs were approached/hit on by hot men more frequently, there would be a lot less angry women on reddit. In fact, certain reddits would cease exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 08:48 PM
1

Fucking hell, someone is mad. XD Smile, dear. --waiting for an overreaction-- Indeed, people can go and find those traits... but you think they will manifest someone with those traits because they want them? Ah yes, the "I cited one stat so I'm right; ma truth is da trooth". Some men may prefer higher education, but you're not a guy, you will never understand some things, I'm sorry. The fact is, most guys really don't give a fuck about a woman's education as long she can keep up, some may cite h…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 08:46 PM
2

The hilarious thing is posting this here the women are careful because their opinions are going to be challenged. But if you posted this to a female space like 2XC they may very well rationalise why this is right. XD Though I disagree. You're a classic case of one of those PPD guys who just needs to interact with the community. Women who think like this (and guys like you) will be laughed at by most of society these days. Men are not expected to expect they cannot get someone less attractive, ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 08:40 PM
1

I dunno about normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 01:34 AM
1

I already saw, but based on the attention you're giving certain comments and the sort of men you're saying the women your age you've got access to ARE giving attention to. That seems to be heavily what you're indicating about that you're feel about yourself. Hence the question, are you trying to say you look feminine? I didn't ask for a picture to judge if you look feminine. Tbh, perhaps as people grow maybe their preferences and mindset do. Did you? Perhaps your character (not just looks) doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 01:34 AM
1

Ah yes, one those "I don't watch porn" guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 01:28 AM
0

Man takes a general idea and tries to disprove it with outliers and says gotcha. Tbh, social class or socioeconomic status makes a difference. Your older hotties are probably higher in the income ladder and younger uggos are probably lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:36 AM
1

Tell me about it, my brudda.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:32 AM
3

Check pornhub, and pick up your fedora before you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:28 AM
1

Certain PPD women fishing for compliments, I suppose it makes sense. I suppose he can entertain certain fantasies without feeling bad through you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:28 AM
1

Are you trying to say you look feminine without blatantly saying you look feminine? If yes, you probably answered your own question. At least as far as the women you're confused about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:26 AM
1

I think we know what sort of men you and most men you know are!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 03:18 AM
1

I suppose its the visuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:20 PM
2

They're happy to tell male friends that. Except if the male friend is the sort who gets triggered, like Blackpill guys and guys who end up in the Redpill who get triggered about female nature, or Bluepill guys who orbit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:42 PM
1

Your study only suggests men and women are equally visual on a neurological level. Which goes into why a guy can't look like a slob and expect to pull. But you can cite that where relevant to the conversation. You didn't suggest men are suddenly going to be attracted to old ladies. In fact, your study did not go into the similarities and contrasts of male and female attraction except visual stimulation into the neurological level.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:38 PM
1

Darn, my money was on full Arab! Then probably some form of Asian (not East Asian), would be my next guess going by the fact you mentioned the importance of communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:31 PM
1

Maybe men (you know who you are!) probably would. Yes, you know what I mean!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:29 PM
2

I'm afraid I do not. Another redditor posted some ideas, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:28 PM
1

Defo a you problem. You've been consuming too many blackpills, sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:27 PM
1

Consideration would also suffice for the purposes of this thread. Re fickleness, challenge the women over the preferences they posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:27 PM
1

I'm not sure cougar is the first thing people think when they see Kim K.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:24 PM
1

Ahh I see, you're cooked.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:44 AM
1

Read the OP, plz
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:57 AM
1

I dunno, that's why I'm asking. I want to see what instilled these wacky beliefs into you. What the hell life are you living, the black pill boot camp?!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:57 AM
1

That's nice, but the idea was to establish what the minimum was. The fact she goes for a undefined minimum which varied didn't do anything re the topic. We got there in the end, tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:55 AM
1

You think being funny didn't help him?!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:52 AM
1

Good, you know some terminology you think you get. Now why does it disprove what the other redditor cited Mr Dunning-Kruger?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:52 AM
2

Defo not, so spill the tea. Where are you getting this particular source of info, son? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:50 AM
1

Older women that don't look so fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:47 AM
1

Especially with shit like crystals and with more accuracy if they know our star signs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:58 AM
1

The time you spent playing the Prince of Persia is time you should have spent on math and stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:57 AM
2

What propaganda do you watch?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:55 AM
2

Okay, sir. We will pretend neurotypical women's views don't matter because some gent didn't fully the OP and prefers them to look at pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:41 AM
8

Going where most men wouldn't go. There could be a career in niche porn for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:38 AM
2

They're probably out there, less complications if there's an arrangement. But, if they are open then there will be frowns by society. The ones who will cry the most are PPDer types (Blackpillers, the ones who call themselves that and pretend to be red to post). Though, another avenue is perceptions like yours, they wouldn't openly admit it because of social shame from women ITT permeating society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:26 AM
13

With men being mainly visual... they wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:23 AM
1

Man... I suppose he could try for phone fun, or just ask when she would be up for those hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:22 AM
2

Listen, if a hottie texted a guy last minute at 2am asking to hook up. You damn well know that guy will move heaven and earth to get there!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:20 AM
2

I mean, she did say she's open for a hook up. I suppose he should have clarified the hours he would like to hook up. Or at the very least sent her an enticing pic of what to expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:19 AM
2

Ngl, my guy. That's one of the funniest things I've read. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:46 AM
1

Not even minor instances, like feeling proud of finishing something, or achieving something? Seems a bit restrictive, no? That makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:44 AM
1

You should see the amount of blackpillers recently. You'd think we had old days Speakers Corner about what women want! Naturally these guys don't have any real info, so this is to consolidate all the info, so they don't have to lowkey ask, or come up with scholarly research. They can ask, since they're afraid to make threads directly asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:42 AM
1

To be brutally honest, TRP mostly speaks common sense. It isn't anything special and probably exaggerates a few elements. Lift, being fit helps, like duh. Groom, looking good helps, like duh. Social skills, anyone who thought this wasn't important really needs a bloody smack on the back of the head. Its important for more than just getting women. Core tenents of TRP are sticky. Many TRPs can't seem to agree what they are. Survey a lot of TRPers anonymously (a non TRP and obviously someone not ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:38 AM
1

Well, I can't exactly PM...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:31 AM
2

Ngl, I was thinking "the hell" when I saw something like 5'9-5'10 was excluded, then when I saw your height made sense. I don't know why, something tells me you're Arab, you mentioned Arab nose and beard a few times!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:29 AM
1

Ah the assumptions of the unplugged man, so enlightened by his tribe! I'm sure you really do! FYI you undermine your point about using your brain when you start talking about the "elites political agenda". I'll bite, let's show "lil chadmeister here how outmatched he is". ;) I'm male, my brudda. And I see a newbie red who just discovered the red pill who thinks he's all woke and shit thinking he's got it all figured out with his conspiracy theories and what not. Ironically, you're blindly trusti…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:26 AM
1

.... So no bragging, but he can't be openly proud... wat That is fair. 7+ years is a long time, I'm presuming young, or waiting till its financially reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:15 AM
2

Easy, your section of the tribe is cooked & misrepped the science,
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:40 PM
1

Looks, status, wealth, and so on NEVER factor in for you when choosing a guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:46 PM
1

You have a tribe, the ones who "showed you the truth" you "unplugged" you from the matrix and exposed the political propaganda that the insidious media pushing! Let me guess, the evil feminist overlords?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:45 PM
1

You listed your requirements which require exceeding which ironically don't seem like things which need super exceeding which makes the whole thing even more puzzling. So a "normal" lifestyle, so to speak. Nothing "fancy", so to speak? So anything 5'10.5 or above, or 5'11 or above? Muscles, that makes it clear. Emotionally intelligent, that's fair. You likely have someone who is an extreme braggart in mind. But are you saying you want someone who is extremely humble? I mean, if you don't scrape …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:44 PM
1

What works for yourself, what can you live without?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:59 PM
3

My guy, your tribe has fully converted you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:40 PM
1

I appreciate that... but I've just been asking WHAT are these requirements?!😅 Ah, you touched on it! Financially stable means what to you? No debt or is there more? Frugal, so no lavish spending, then? And what's the height requirement ti be taller than you? 5'6, 5'9? Lean, I get. Jacked, so low body fat is a must or it must be clear there are muscles? No general intelligence doesn't matter if he is emotionally intelligent? Humble, so he can't be proud of his achievements, attributes or take pri…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:33 PM
1

Interesting. Though, imo it depends on generation. That's probably based on Boomers and Gen X, probably. Modern women (sensible talk, not the bitter angry men talk you see here!) may feel differently due to differences in social norms imo. Looks could be important depending on the woman, you could argue. If you want to contextualise it further, the demographics I have in mind are outlined below: A late section of Gen Y, or Millennials, (let's say 25-35 year olds), excluding geriatric Millennials…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:22 PM
2

Oh yes, your extreme insight into evolution and the rest of us are still in the matrix!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:05 PM
1

Your requirements aren't really requirements or a threshold if guys need to exceed them. Good thing you only have to talk about the requirements that are relevant to you now. If you feel previous requirements are relevant, you cab go through that. So going by that do you know what the guys have ti exceed to be date-able now? Is so, what is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:59 PM
1

Would do you reckon that's true 100% of the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:54 PM
3

Oh yes, the reality from your thought experiments fueled by confirmation bias. Naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:54 PM
1

Interesting points. Though different for older women in what sense? Just so we're on the same page, what age does "older womanhood" start? (Some of these ppd men have bizarre views!)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:47 PM
1

Fair point re achievement. Re higher classed, based on experience or opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:00 PM
1

Does the look share common elements e.g. body type?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:59 PM
1

In your case?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:58 PM
0

It makes sense, you happen to be the minority of redditors that just have poor comprehension. Comes with the territory when you give readers the flexibility to interpret how they will!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:58 PM
1

Most explaining the purpose and how it either looks like you're not getting the purpose of the thread, or your standards seem to be feelings based as you can't seem to define the minimum requirements for said standard. In other words, it seems like your standards are vague just "high" which can vary depending on how you feel as demonstrated by how you can't define them and noted how all your previous guys haven't had anything in common apart from being male. Last part just contextualising women …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:56 PM
2

The fuck?!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:52 PM
1

Lots of threads go into the minimum either by low key asking or you get the PPD male scholars who feel they figured it out. This is a catch all to make it crystal clear what it looks like. Obviously once you know what the minimum is, you can infer what the max is. You might be capping there. Women have more options then the dingbat black and Dunning-Kruger reds who bitch about women's preferences, but not necessarily to the best men, so to speak because those guys also have a choice too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:17 PM
1

All interesting. So any achievement would suffice, no matter what? Interesting re socioeconomic/class background, why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:13 PM
1

What personality and looks do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:09 PM
1

So you're unaware of the criteria and it's entirely dependent on your feelings then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:08 PM
0

Speak your truth, my PPD male scholar! Improving reading comprehension and working on that frame would help you be taken more seriously, tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:07 PM
1

Ok, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:28 PM
1

I don't think you get it. What diffentiates men from the bottom of the barrel to the others... do you even know? The second part implies you may not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:27 PM
1

Do you even know what counts as not the bottom and the lower end of your dating requirements? This reply indicates you may not. Rather there's a bit factor that separates the bottom from the top and you don't know what is for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:09 PM
4

Endless praise is so amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:05 PM
1

We'll keep that in mind PPD man who felt the burning urge to qualify his experience like the other PPD male scholars! Read the first part of the OP and you'll get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:59 PM
1

Interesting, any particular status and looks that captivate you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:49 PM
1

Ngl, still don't get that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:48 PM
1

What's your process for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:47 PM
1

This is the minimum requirement to meet your criteria. What of each would be required to not be bottom of the barrel criteria, make it super simple so these low-key questioners and these PPD male scholars can understand. And which criteria are essential and which can you do without, ofc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:46 PM
1

Would you say on average, for you the above average guy wins 6+/10 times, generally speaking?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:44 PM
1

I'm sure that's what some think.👀
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:41 PM
1

Would that apply to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:39 PM
0

Can you please translate that into words for the rest of us mortals?😬
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:38 PM
1

Interesting. Few follow ups: What minimal of each would captivate you e.g., what sort of body would make you excited to see him or want the guy (the minimal), similar with the others. Height, even say 5'0-5'7? Generic clothing is the minimal threshold for you, or a man who can dress well or has a particular sense for fashion can grab your attention in a good way? Shaved face, as in no facial hair include a stubble? What about other aspects like cologne, scents etc? Depending on the age, or socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:36 PM
1

You don't need to answer, boo boo.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:41 AM
0

Screw the blackpiller feelings! Be blunt with each category about what would be the min threshold for you for each category.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:38 AM
3

To get to the stage where you are testing sexual compatability, which of the criteria wouldn't matter more/less?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:35 AM
-1

Thats up to you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:32 AM
6

You are correct, what is the smallest of each category you will accept before saying you'll pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 10:32 AM
1

Then so be it. Or perhaps some guys hope they will, perhaps, it may contradict what their pill dojo taught them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:20 AM
1

Skinny, like boney?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:18 AM
8

Pretty interesting. Would all of these be needed, or could a guy still attract you if he lacked say status or wealth?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:16 AM
1

Do you reckon that's the case with all pretty men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:12 AM
0

Interesting. ​ But in each of those cases, is there a minimum threshold a guy would have to meet i.e., if they don't meet minimum threshold, they're filtered out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 09:12 AM
1

The sub bullets are just examples you're free to use, if you'd like to. I've seen rando guys use some as examples, so I figured I'd toss them in as examples. With that in mind, what's the minimum threshold for personality, looks, status, job and other details (if relevant) that you feel a guy needs to attract you? Would personality matter without one/more of the others?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:47 AM
3

Do you think women disqualify you based on these criteria? If there are controllable aspects making you feel uneasy, then work on them and try speaking to women after you have. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:43 AM
4

It just simply what minimum thresholds are suitable. Or do you rather the male scholars who think they are the next Socrates of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:42 AM
2

If I wanted that, I would have posted a sugar baby advert, sir!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:31 AM
3

I'm sure there are minimum thresholds, the guys seem to overthink it more it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:30 AM
1

Why would you be repulsed by them? And why discord?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:29 AM
1

How do you mean vapid?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:28 AM
1

So body then face? With your post in mind, what's the minimum body threshold?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:27 AM
0

You're seeing it wrong. The middle ground is if you can alter your path, i.e. have the power to change things instead of accepting the narrative forced on you. Then its absolutely fine to do something about it. Rather than be a reddit version of a Dunning-Kruger who thinks they know what a narcissists is and see "manipulation" as a "stranger danger" style word. You can see it as the redditor intended. If you can alter, or manipulate your path, then go for it. In crude terms, your view would be c…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:20 AM
5

With all these ladies paying alimony, I wanna get married!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:14 AM
1

Ah yes, sis truth in action. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 11:11 PM
1

Your truth seems to make you happy, roll with it sis!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 11:04 PM
1

Oh you mean the elements from your truth/drama shows you thought mattered? Yeah that's bc your truth doesn't matter in a independent scenario. Ofc you don't have brothas, sis. Assuming your truth is the truth, and women are divine except with wealthy men- anyone would've guessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 10:47 PM
1

The questions were not avoided. You added elements to the scenario you feel matter bc you feel it holds weight in every scenario (it doesn't). That's on you. Back to buzzwords you don't understand. I guess brothas did call this sista out. 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 10:34 PM
1

Nothing like that. It's consistent. You added the nonsense like nosy god like detective women and the only way to avoid them is having resources. Adding irrelevantb variables from your experiences and erroneous assumptions and assertions is on you. You using your truth seems to be triggering. Seems like you've been called out for this before, sista.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 10:08 PM
1

That's true, stupid cheats get caught. I never detailed a process, it can be very low effort for the scenario discussed. You're adding extra variables because you've got the audacity to think your truth is thee truth. Quite a self centred way of looking at it, tbh. It is, bc you think your life experience matters and applies in all cases whether you're directly involved or not (it doesn't), sista!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:57 PM
1

Never claimed that. But you said no matter what a nosy woman would find out and a man needs to do a lot to cover up. Clear bias on your end. Keep speaking your truth, sista! Deny what the patriarchy says women are goddesses that see all!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:42 PM
1

You're defo not objective miss nosey wahmen shalt find out by almost divine means unless men have access to a wealth if resources as per ma truth! Now you'll use buzzwords you don't understand bc you can't stand being caught out. But you're free to speak your, sis. ;) Tho you'd be wrong in thinking your truth is thee truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:35 PM
1

It is your truth bc it involves how you see it and you believe it is the truth based on your life experience which you feel is representative. But, carry on speaking your truth, girl!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:04 PM
1

Thank you for taking the time to clarify! I wanted to avoid the usual suspects from misrepresenting your description. Concurrently it should be crystal clear for the OP. Remember, a lot of these men need to have it literally spelt out for them bc their problems with women won't allow them to ask normal questions. They'd rather read and get triggered in slience. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:00 PM
1

Not obsessed, I meant slim like you can see some muscle definition. Slightly overweight in my example would look like he's not fat, maybe slight pudge, but when you touch its evident he's fit. In both cases, with clothing, slim and sightly overweight look like they workout. But they aren't obsessed like say WWE wrestlers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:25 PM
1

See enough gents here via their replie, threads and questions and it's unequivocally a case of being a fuckin dingbat. Hence why I asked the lovely lady to clarify so it crystal clear to the overthinkimg males of PPD who will add rando variables that people don't generally have in mind. We know the height and weight aren't like for like comparisons. We have a good idea what women mean. Only some people here will firmly think 6'2 when about 6ft will suffice as tall. On practical terms 5ft10-5ft11…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:21 PM
1

Like slim but gym fit slim, and same with slight overweight like he can be fit, but he doesn't need to have lots of muscle lines, but it's evident there are muscles, that sort of thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:11 PM
1

Ah the typical "no u" while wanting to believe your truth is thee truth. 😆 Feel free speak your truth, hun!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:09 PM
1

I don't even know why I'm still here when idc enough nor even completely agree with the guy you replied to... only the choice of method and reasoning you chose to defend it....😕
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:15 PM
1

What is slim to slightly overweight to you? Mind you, a good chunk of guys here are fucking dingbats that don't understand women's words. Slim to slightly overweight to the overthinking angsty males in ppd could mean something something completely different to what you have in mind. Slim has some definition like evidence of physical fitness same with slightly overweight?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:13 PM
1

I asked as when a guy hears a girl is a face person, they'll think those extremes work if the guy has a nice face. With that in mind, what is the minimum threshold for a pass?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:49 PM
3

The OP's question is a coded question for maximising a hetro male attractiveness. Height there is nothing you can do. Unless you're willing to spend a year or so in a wheelchair and use a contraption for this time. Body, you can. Small details are in the middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:51 PM
1

In a sense, a pretty face gives you less to work for, so to speak. That would imply if such a guy worked on his bod, your libido would go into overdrive!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:46 PM
3

No one mentioned options. Though it's interesting you brought that up. Do you personally like the men you described as the conventionally attractive ones would cheat, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:42 PM
1

The study just collected info in the best way they knew how while following ethical guidelines. Hence it was good enough. Any basic knowledge of research methodology would notify you self reports have their flows especially when in the face of contradictory data as presented here. Other factors and details are to be considered, but you get the gist. Didn't you read the argument you were having l?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:40 PM
2

Hypothetically, you'd still be attracted to a nice face on a guy who is really skinny or really fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:36 PM
6

I don't think anyone's expecting women to go for men with the bodies of Fat Buu or Power Weight Cell (extreme ends). But most men will call cap at dad bod/chubby comment, esp if you're saying David Bowie.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:57 AM
1

Its a PPD thing where the women have an axe to grind or simps are trying to earn coochie points. Any gender points they feel is a sleight against women, they'll have to try to say "b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but what about men?!"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:50 AM
1

I suppose they feel its all they have to offer to the man in question. That implies they know this guy could be in it purely for the sex and they're hoping they can change him. Why, well, men everywhere would like to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:47 AM
10

"Develop attraction" is odd. It seems like that's what nice guys, and friendzone nice guys expect when they accept women SHOULD be attracted to guys like them. And women when they believe they SHOULD be attracted to nice guys, and not the guys they naturally are attracted to, which in context to this thread would be certain physiques, height, and things like that. I appreciate you're a face person, but surely you'd see a body sometimes and think dirty thoughts, especially if it was on a face you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:46 AM
21

I dunno, sis. I wouldn't readily agree with you. One thing the manosphere probably gets right with you gals is your words about what you say is probably worthless, in some sense. How you'll act with respect to the social context matters more. Women have this stupid tendency to be people pleasures, so on some level (despite the burning urge you'll have to disagree with me) your answers are symptomatic and cater to this too. Despite being behind an anonymous internet alias. Having said that you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:42 AM
1

I'm sure they are, m'lady! That's why you felt the need to me when you respond. ;) You quoted studies like he did, and I just laughed at you using self reports. Though I suppose self reports didn't matter since it backed up your truth. Though I suppose whatever citations he quoted didn't matter since it wasn't consistent with your truth. But, its fine, speak your truth, sis! There are funnier/more effective ways to poke holes in his logic. But I suppose if you wanted to get your truth out there,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:22 AM
1

Obviously you, bae. I'm not the one who seems to think women have some deity level traits that will always catch men because her truth which is equivalent to the truth says so unless the man has a wealth of resources! But yes, for the hypothetical scenario where the lady gave it up easy, for his sake hopefully they think like you. Then it will be incredibly easy to get away with it, even more so if he's a smart cheat!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:18 AM
1

You seem to confuse two.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:09 PM
1

Your truth, you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:56 PM
1

Looking at your replies to him, you sure weren't miss my truth is thee truth hence self reports are irrefutable!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:48 PM
1

I'm sure you'd like to believe that. ;]
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:47 PM
1

If a guy puts himself in that position, he's not a good cheat. You're aware your experience isn't representation, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:39 PM
1

A nosy women isn't some super deity that will automatically catch him out where the sluttier she was the betterbshe will detect XD What the hell drama shows have you been watching?! If the average woman thinks that's what it takes, then the man needs to seriously be dumb to get caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:27 PM
1

I'm not that invested in proving you wrong. I'm just laughing at the fact that was your main evidence. Self reports, yeah totally flawless. You seem too hence you seem to try to prove him wrong. Ahhhhhh, personal experience. Your truth is thee truth. Makes sense now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:25 PM
1

I'm not that invested in proving you wrong. I'm just laughing at the fact that was your main evidence. Self reports, yeah totally flawless. You seem too hence you seem to try to prove him wrong. Ahhhhhh, personal experience. Your truth is thee truth. Makes sense now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:25 PM
1

Like a every woman thinks she will catch a cheating man. Doesn't make it true. ;) It doesn't take that much. That's a hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:21 PM
1

She's nosy ergo she'll find out, some divine nose. Just bc the men you personally known are unable to cheat competently cheat doesn't mean men who can competently cheat don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:44 PM
1

I just chuckled at the fact your desire to defend the wahmen again this fella no matter how flawed his point may or may not be was so strong that you hose to use self reports despite the chats here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:42 PM
1

You don't seem to understand projection. Though you did purposely misinterpret the topic for pussy points. 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:40 PM
3

You're probably one of those women who think men in dates are assaulters and rapists until they proved they won't.v Bit dramatic, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:53 AM
1

I'm a redpiller now haha, I wonder wonder who hurt you? You defo seem like the wahman can't do wrong type and anyone who says the opposite is a redpiller. Soz babes, in this scenario, the woman's slutty past would be judged. If she won't give it up easy like she did for everyone else, the guy can stay. But he can cheat until a year passes and she can stop pretending she's a nun and let that latent slut energy out. If she doesn't find out it's fine. No matter how angry, triggered or called out yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:49 AM
1

It's not that moralistic. You're simply reluctant. And no, you're not going to get a flood of ppd ladies offering their bodies by pretending you don't understand. 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:44 AM
1

Maybe he likes this one... He has to be stupid if her nosiness can exposes it. You might be confusing nosiness with omnipresence tbh. And those are very stupid cheats.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:42 AM
1

A) except ITT women did a lot more. B) pose a dumb nonsensical question based on a scenario you didn't really think through, you'll get an answer you're not satisfied with bc you didn't think it through... while being made fun of due to the sheer absurdity of it. C) Ofc, she obviously didn't have the right mind to pick a man who likes ladies.... or maybe some bedroom factors on her end put him off that other men she encounters will also be put off from.... Men who don't try to score chick points…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:40 AM
1

In context for reasons unknown, still looks amazingly funny. I didn't go from anything. You tried a gotcha but it blew up in your face bc you didn't realise (and still don't fromvthe looks of it) why it makes her look worse. So she withholds sex with a guy she doesn't have sex with yet fir a whole year, to then cheat to meet her needs! 😆 You point sounds like you wanted to make the point cheaters suck and sone condone it if men do it. Yet you achieved from making the women in the scene who gave …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:32 AM
1

Thank you but you knew what I meant. Though, the chick credits you tried to earn didn't seem to help you retain your account.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:26 AM
1

She act hysterical or some shit, like how a many, overwhelmingly women, chose villainze the guy without considering his perspective, especially in the scenarios where the woman gave it up easy to exes, or with high n counts gave it up to everyone else within seconds. Especially when it wasn't considered if she made exes wait as long or is a virgin, she'd wait too. Guys tend to want to avoid needless drama. See above. No alternatives needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:25 AM
1

You won't do them wrong if they won't find out. Sad maybe unfair to some. But a guy is allowed to judge and act depending on a girl's weird behaviour with respect to her past.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:20 AM
1

For the high n count/gave it up easy for the exes pronto, there's no legit reason he can't cheat incognito apart from one feeling the woman has been wronged, objectively speaking. Really, it matters not if she doesn't find out. If she has no obligation to give it up easy to exclusively him unlike guys before, he can get his needs met elsewhere while she waits to be ready. Objectively speaking that's the best. Unless one has a issues with their PERSONAL value systems about the sexual bunny turned…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:18 AM
0

Self reports, very flawless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:12 AM
1

Why disdainful? You're only happy when the woman has her needs met while the guy has his neglected even though he'll do it in a way that benefits everyone? That's quite misandrist thinking 🤔 I presented a scenario. You just keep saying it's wrong even though no one that will be hurt would ever know. Tbh, your personal gripe with cheaters doesn't matter. Virgin or makes her men wait... he may understand. Gave it up to previous bfs in days or hours..or with high n counts, gave it up to anyone with…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 11:05 PM
1

Fair play. Re the wild worldviews, tell me about it. Play devil's advocate - all sides - and you will see how wild these views actually are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:17 AM
1

Not really objective, you seem to feel strongly that's it. You also irrationally and erroneously believe it is harmful while using a false analogy that doesn't apply. The logic is sound, you're just superimposing a value system into this scenario assuming your obviously strong feelings on the matter determine whether it is objectively "right" (your feelings do not determine anything) whether anyone would objectively care if if no one finds out (no one would care).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:16 AM
2

Yet gender politics forces us not to think properly when making absolute statements! I didn't say you should spend hours. Just simple critical thinking. If your point is prove the OP wrong or rile him up, point out contradictions in his logic. With the TRP guys, there always are contradictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:09 AM
3

Only if you see a TRP post that triggers you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:05 AM
2

You mean articles you read citing studies, no actual thought in how the data is collected and do on. Tbf, neither pills cite data properly or with integrity, alas you'd expect this in gender politics dubs where most users have an axe to grind
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:58 AM
0

No one cares, ots practical despite your irrational bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:46 AM
3

Ofc, that's why I still interact with most this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:34 AM
1

Bc they do them or bc they are the ones caught? Why are they caught more of so? Women less likely to be looked at for those things? PPD thinking about data properly, both sides lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:34 AM
1

Or cheating and migrate to get when she is ready. Why do you assume disdain? The man likes her, just needs sex, this way he does without slut shaming her while she neglect his needs for year while she pretends everyone else got it in record time. She's not all present or all knowing, she'll be none the wiser. Interesting a few PPDers take the view of "woman must protected at all costs, screw the man's point of view anything that looks bad from him is bad because he's man".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:31 AM
3

You're a ppd person. So that's probably a lie, alone, or that's a triggered reply to the OP basically infantilising women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:25 AM
3

So women don't do these things? Suddenly the mentality of some of you makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:23 AM
1

Sadly PPD opposition and FDS are the same
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:21 AM
2

Man basically called women toddlers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:20 AM
2

You're talking about the oldest profession in the world lol Ahh the "stats".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:03 AM
0

The guy doesn't care since one can argue that used goods is making him wait a year before ge can get into the common ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 06:52 AM
2

The analysis isn't objective, complete, nor is it thorough. If looks and personality can't help you and your hope is money, OF and sex workers then you've probably got as much demons as your average TRP guy and PPD gal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 06:43 AM
1

There is, cheat smartly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:56 AM
5

We have 2 threads saying money and 1 saying status. Sorry ladies, you can be bought.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:45 AM
1

Doesn't matter, he's getting his needs met...is it better to slut shame her into having sex quicker? She'll probably have some weird overreaction and not understand how it looks. That is the fact all her exes got it easy, but he has to wait a year. Or the case with a high n count everyone got it easy except the guy she likes. I mean you're trying to rationalise why her not finding out is wrong when there will be no harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:42 AM
3

You guys change your minds all the time depending on how triggered you are or what triggered you.🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:29 AM
1

Gave it up easily refers to ex boyfriend, that is sus. Now if she is a high n count gal then well......... It is not wrong with these 2 cases if he isn't caught when he is rightfully frustrated yet not shaming her for "fair treatment" for access to conjugal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:27 AM
2

Depends on me, the girl, what I'm doing... multiple variables.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:24 AM
2

Most men enjoy sex, I'm afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:22 AM
2

3 months.... you absolute monsters
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:20 AM
1

It's okay to admit you'd kinda be on her side more. You're online, not offline. Also, she'll never know. Unfair that in the scenarios where she gave it up to other men easy he'd probably cheat in the most efficient ways compared to scenarios where she didn't (or didn't give it at all)? Maybe, but like everyone we get judged by our past...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:16 AM
8

That's enough Internet for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:09 AM
1

Read your scenario and contextualise it: Promiscuous woman says no sex until a year passes, but had sex with others quickly after being in a relationship or after meeting someone for the first time Man decides not to pressure her or slut shame her, but instead cheats on her during the year to meet his sexual needs until she is ready all while she doesn't know You proceed to add that also in the year said promiscuous woman is cheating on the guy without him knowing for reasons unknown....when she…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:03 AM
1

Not pressuring her using slut shaming tactics via the fact she gave it up easily for her exes... or everyone in the case for high n count women is... while meeting your needs else where. Then that woman needs therapy because she's the one who closed off sex for a year. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:44 AM
1

You mean if he is doing the cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:40 AM
1

Or that's a the consistent theme in your posts, my doge. Perhaps they fit together, but he just isn't getting sex... but he has a solution. She'll know about it unless he's a very stupid man. Also think about context, my doge, if he likes, he'll likely opt for solutions like sex worker or go way out of the area. My guy, being a woman does not make her omnipresent and omniscient despite what some in PPD may believe. If he isn't an idiot, she will never find out. When she is ready, he can go back.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:39 AM
2

That's fine and dandy, but you didn't address my points... unless you concur? ;) Further, how well people conceal their n count is not the topic I care to discuss ITT, obviously. It looks like you randomly shifted out of the blue... which is interesting in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:34 AM
0

Wrong, dishonest... WHO CARES. If she doesn't find out, it doesn't matter. He gets his needs met while she gets her needs met. Its not just about her needs. The part about her not being omnipresent and not being omniscient.. that means she will not be know she was "lied to or backstabbed" while she neglected his needs for a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:30 AM
1

He might like her and stay either way, but cheat because he needs sex, it isn't black and white. If he thinks its bullshit, he could literally stay and see how true it is... while cheating. Contrary to what many people seem to think about the woman, or women in general, she is not omnipresent nor is she omniscient. If he executes it properly, she will never know. When she gives it up, he'll transition to her. He could just have a new girl each time if he uses sex workers when he REALLY needs to …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:28 AM
1

I seriously doubt just because the man embarks on this very practical solution, he's count to suddenly find himself in the scenario where he is one of the 2 out 100 men that experiences issues with condoms. XD For your second part, or here is the kicker... if the girlfriend that gave it up for easily for every ex... or everyone if she's a high n count lady won't give it up for a year, he can meet his needs else where. That has nothing to do with his ability to use a condom. But the hard reach on…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:25 AM
1

In a similar vein, if your girlfriend is being weird, as per this situation (giving it up for all her previous men easily... or everyone yet you must wait a year) you can meet your needs elsewhere until time elapses.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:14 AM
1

Why are you insistent that he is the issue? In the scenarios we are discussions she's consciously decided to tell him to wait a year while she gave it up for her exes quickly, or to everyone else interested in minutes. Especially when he's willing to bite the bullet and live with the shame of being made fun of... probably by the many people who did sleep with her in the case of the high n count woman. Tbh, there is no real harm done if she never finds out. He'll just swap from the side piece, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:12 AM
1

Couldn't one argue you what "you are all going to automatically going to be on her side" because... she is wonderful? So you admit the boundary is absurd in the scenario she was extremely keen with everyone else? You ladies seriously overestimate how masturbation feels compared to sex. XD You're doing it again. Ignoring his side, but though, you admitted you'd automatically take her side, so that makes sense. However, I'm not sure what you are reading. There is no indication she would be forced …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:06 AM
0

If he cheats incognito, that is keeps it to himself, it is perfectly fine you can argue. Until she is ready to meet his needs (only applies if she gave it up easy to exes/ or a high n count that gave it up to every rando). She will never be hurt, or feel betrayed because she's never going know about it. Why? She is neither omnipresent nor is she omniscient.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:11 PM
1

Likewise he has a choice on whether or not he wants to feel foolish or not, like being the only clown who waits a year to get action while being in the relationship... or get his needs met elsewhere until she's ready to open shop again. Though, he's probably likely to understand and go with it if she's a virgin/made exes do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:08 PM
1

When did I say what I personally think about either matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:06 PM
1

Or cheat incognito, and keep it to yourself, until she's ready; in cases where she has a high n count/gave it up easy for prior partners. That's also not rocket science. No harm done. The other scenarios (virgin/made others wait), your suggestion makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:04 PM
1

Lots of "she must be protected at all costs, screw what her rando requirement does to his head" vibes, I'm getting here. You'd assume he'd enamored by her hence the loophole solution. If she's a virgin or made other partners wait that long, the guy would probably bite the bullet because he knows it is isn't anything personal. Now... if her n count is high and/or she gave it up to exes very quickly and asked the guy to wait a year... a guy may wait a year to have sex with her. However, rather tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:02 PM
1

Why is it not taking her seriously? Why does it make him look like a dick to a lady to set a boundary when you admit she looks odd? He'd think the same. Further you're purely looking at it from the woman's point of you. No regard for the man, which is interesting. You don't think he'll wonder why he's the only one who waits why others (who probably are in the area/nearby esp the case for high n count women) got easy access? A lot of those guys may even make fun of him. You know that analogy does…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:55 PM
1

Probably the only person who bothered to sees the guy's point of view on through some angle. Though, I'm presuming you talking about the scenario where the woman was promiscuous/gave it up quick? So you'd see a case for a guy choosing to stay provided they get on perfectly otherwise, yet choosing to get some on the side to cope for a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:50 PM
1

Why not wrongly? Cheating is wrong, of course. But in this case, I doubt many would say. Assuming no negative experiences, I doubt many would have sympathy for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:45 PM
1

Few reasons... to see if the the wait is worth it considering everyone the high demand access zone they like each other in all aspects but he's frozen out for a year Interestingly a lot of your proposals are centered around the woman assuming how things would go if she ever found out. Any views of how he's affected by her rando to wait long decision -- compared to giving it up to others in minutes to days -- is minimized to the effect of "just leave her". He might wonder why is he the only one, …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:44 PM
2

What is inconsistent is he's the only one who needs to wait for 12 months and previous partners had the fast track to sex land. Well... She has already chosen to be to be treated like a fool, one can argue. Her rep's known, so it'll be odd that this one guy has to wait. Either something is wrong with her or him... its lose-lose. Plus the guy is likely to be made fun of by others who got easy access if she's a high n count woman. With this solution, he won't pressure her for sex by using her past…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:36 PM
1

It isn't pointless, you're trying to turn it into a pointless morality question while superimposing your value system into the situation while trying to avoid directly addressing the question. Truthfully, for the sake of the topic: I don't care an pitch or lecture about your value system. Unless you make it to the point about link it directly to the precise question you are choosing to avoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:32 PM
1

One might think trying to flip the genders is a cop out! :O Of course not, it probably means she's being difficult for some reason. You could Normally flip genders, but you chose the most silly thing to flip genders for... a man consciously withholding sex. Some of you PPD people when you're looking for your moment. XD That lady doesn't need to cheat, she needs therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:29 PM
1

Jesus Christ, what the hell?! I merely presented a scenario to see if these variables changed anything. XD The reason I stipulated the scenarios was also to control for the inevitable "what counts" whereby some will say certain sexual encounters do not count towards their N. The main factor it was also stipulated was to see if her sexual past would have any influence on whether or not the gentleman in the hypothetical scenario would/should go through the incognito cheating scenario presented to …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:26 PM
1

Why? You say selfish, but ironically you're fixed on the woman's point of view. In the case of where the lady is promiscuous, especially if she was a high n count woman, where she expects the man to wait 12 months, when prior encounters got it in minutes or days ... somehow that is justifiable? I mean its like you don't seem to care how it feels for the man, tbh. The only thoughts you can say is he's selfish he needs to leave he he can't wait to stick it in. Its an interesting view where your va…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:11 PM
1

Why is that a cop out? If you seriously think a high n count man is going to purposely withhold sex from a lovely looking lady who wants sex so badly, she would be willing to cheat if he doesn't give it to her... he's obviously not into ladies. So you've changed the parameters so its not like for like. You tell me, is it okay for her to cheat? I never said whether I personally feel if it is acceptable for anyone in the circumstances presented. I merely presented scenarios. You seem to be trouble…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:01 PM
1

Funnily enough women seem feel personally attacked by question hence they try the whole "b-b-b-b-b-b-but if you switch gender is it okay?!!!!!!!!!" approach. Like I told the other lady, wrong guy if you're hoping for that gotcha moment. If she's a dumb cheat, she'll get caught. Further, I never disclosed what I actually think. A high n count man not meeting her needs is very unlikely though. If a high n count man is the guy choosing to withhold sex, then she has other problems there. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 07:40 PM
1

You don't think it is absurd if a high n count woman expects a man to wait 12 months when prior encounters got it in minutes or days? I'm seeing a lot of thinking centered around her and how it would be for her if she found out or how it would be for her and so on, but not so much how it feels for him... any thought for him is minimized as "just leave bro"... interesting. However, his solution would be thinking about her. He doesn't pressure her, use her past to slut shame her to have sex early.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 07:37 PM
1

Few misunderstandings. I did not say what I am or am not okay with, I presented scenarios. Also I'm saying if the lady is a virgin, or made exes wait a similar length of time then it is probable the guy is going to respect her "wait for a year" boundary and not cheat. However, if the lady gave it up to exes very quickly or has a high n count, it is unlikely he is going to respect her "wait for a year" boundary and as a result cheat on the sly. Her boundary is respected; he isn't pressuring her t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 06:36 PM
1

There is he can cheat on the sly
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:13 AM
1

That is usually why they aren't viewed as desirable mates, funny enough. Higher count associated with the propensity to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:13 AM
1

Or say till he gets the jackpot then leave. If he did, she might as well leave bc he isn't into ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:11 AM
1

To see if the poon is worth the wait
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:10 AM
1

Ofc, but sus if a high n count woman expects a man to wait q2 months before getting any.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:10 AM
1

In this dude's case with the high n count lady, ofc. They turned him gay? Her emotional needs? That lady just needs something from her psychiatrist and she'll be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:09 AM
1

You can... just don't tell her. In this case she got a guy to cheat, so she's great at making choices! Cheating is fine, provided he stfu and keeps or set. If you read my posts, I said don't be a dumb cheat... but women aren't usually going to have the same n count issues that men do, I'm afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:06 AM
1

Or he can use the practical loophole....
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:03 AM
1

Or use the loophole until she reawakens her inner slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:02 AM
1

Pretty sus for a promiscuous woman to suddenly make a guy wait 12 months. Or... stay, cheat until her slut energy comes back! For some reason, I seriously doubt high count men would withhold sex... I doubt men would successfully withhold sex from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 05:01 AM
1

In this case it might be just, especially if a promiscuous woman suddenly decides age wants to pretend she's a good Morm, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:58 AM
1

You're talking to the wrong guy if you think the flipping the gender will change the assertions. Well the non promiscuous sample may have their boundaries respected...the promiscuous sample tho....
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:56 AM
1

She'll find out if he's a dumb cheat! Wait the hell man wants to wait?! Same rules apply. He won't find out... unless she's a dumb cheat... tho if HE is saying no to sex, I think she might have try poking his booty and see how he reacts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:54 AM
1

Or enjoy the relationship, but ger his needs met by cheating until she's ready. A woman with a high n count isn't going to be taken seriously if she makes a man wait for a year tho... what made her realise? Either way she has the n count... unless the guy is dumb, he won't get caught. I'm just interested in the perspectives here, I'm not going to give away where I stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:51 AM
1

In this case, wrongfully in the case where he's cheating on a promiscuous woman asking him to wait 12 months!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:46 AM
1

You're avoiding the specific question
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:45 AM
1

And the people who think the the promiscuous women telling him to wait a year is odd... which will be more people than you expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:44 AM
1

:)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:42 AM
1

Like having tons of casual sex is. If she gave it up in minutes for random and expects a guy to wait a year........ then the guy should be entitled to cheat if he chooses.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:29 AM
1

Promiscuous women suddenly making a man wait for 12 months... he's entitled to take care of himself regardless of some dated value systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:27 AM
1

I am now convinced you PPD girls don't read. Look at the bottom of the OP... there's a list of scenarios
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:26 AM
1

I'm sure you'll score some chick points with that!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:24 AM
1

Only really bad if she gets hurt... and that's if she finds out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:23 AM
1

Doesn't matter what you call it, it's a solution. Right and wrong are relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:21 AM
1

Why do you think I'm trolling? That's why the guy has to be a smart cheat and not get caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:20 AM
1

You can still meet your needs without hurting her if you keep it to yourself. I mean she can pretend she never gave it up easy and it doesn't count.... but the guy can still take it less seriously bc he'll probably think its more to do with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:19 AM
1

Well... how long she made others wait DOES matter. Tells the guy is she sees him as a clown, stupid, or attractive etc... in the cases where she gave it up easy there's a strong case where he can wait it out while cheating and its fine. For his peace of mind, just bc she wants to pretend she didn't do what she did before
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:17 AM
1

Well if the previouly "easy" ones suddenly make him wait, surely he can proceed with the loophole.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:14 AM
1

If its just due a former high n count suddenly deciding to make a poor chap wait for a year, or a girl who gave it up easy for exes making a poor guy wait... he doesn't need to break it off if everything if good sans the sex wait time. He's allowed to cheat on the sly till she's ready. Especially with the high n who likely did most people he knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:12 AM
1

Like giving it up easy to every stranger and ex yet making a guy wait for a year... is that respecting the guy much? Cheating is probably easier than a sex toy for most guys tbh. Plus they'd be up for that likely if the lady is a virgin or made exes wait, as its understandable. But if she has a high n count or gave it up yo exes easy... then err
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:09 AM
1

What's the right thing? Avenging men... wat
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:06 AM
1

I presented a situation. Do you think her sexual background has no impact here?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:04 AM
1

Like choosing to make a SO wait for a year despite letting past SOs, or every other man wait a few days or as little as a few minutes os also a choice, right? To you that's fine, but cheating and fulfilling his need on the sky, without pressuring her while waiting, not bringing up the hoe past while dealing with the fact he's the only guy that has to deal with a 12 month wait time while it feels everyone got the express ride... that's fine for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:03 AM
1

You can take her seriously, just not the sex clause if she has a track record of giving it up to other bfs easily or other men very easily. Well, in the scenario I outlined, it arguably makes him resourceful. It makes her look odd tho. Well she is if she gave it to other exes in a matter of days, or in a case of a high n count women gave it to guys in min yet makes this guy wait 12 months. He should be allowed to sleep around on the sly until she regains her hoe chi back!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 03:58 AM
1

If he's stupid enough to disclose, otherwise its kosher. Well you could argue morals if she's a virgin or did this with all exes. But if she has a high n count or gave ot up easily for exes but makes the guy in question wait a year.... the moral argument loses water.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 03:54 AM
1

Except the situation isn't as black and white. If she's a virgin or did this with exes... OK. But if she has a high n count or gave it up for exes quick, then he can cheat as obviously he's apparently not attractive enough it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 03:52 AM
1

Actually, if it comes to a scenario like this where the lady is asking a gent to wait a year for sex, then what she did in the paste absolutely has massive influence. It also determines whether her terms are to be taken seriously or not. If she's a virgin/put exes through the same terms, you know that is how it is. However, if she has a high n count or just gave it to exes swiftly, then he has no reason to take her all too seriously. He can agree and cheat on her on the side until she's ready. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:39 AM
1

If other exes went through the same/she's a virgin, an agreement can be reached it seems. However, if has a high n count or just gave it up easy to previous exes... then taking her seriously will be challenging tbh, esp if he doesn't have to understand her reasoning. Besides, he's sly and she never knows, there is really no harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:35 AM
1

Aww, you really were trigged! ;* Did someone feel called out?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:33 AM
1

Frankly, I don't give a shit about your background. Normally the people who need to point out randomly, usually TRPers tend to... stretch the truth. Cite these "basic social health markers" that you're using to draw your conclusions. Family formation... the fuck are you on about. That functionalism shit died. We don't live in the 1950s anymore, my guy, Social networks still exist, just not as you've probably idealized them. There has always been a concentration of wealth and power to some extent…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:32 AM
1

1-2 years... holy mother of god....
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:22 AM
1

Including say.... not waiting a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:21 AM
1

But, it seems her sexual history with her guys (how easy she gave it up; or if she gave it up) compared to how easy she wants to give it to him will determine that. The ladies that gave it up easy seem to be the ones who be the unfortunate ones here since I cannot see how they can justify why they would tell him why he's the only guy who has to wait a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:21 AM
1

Of course, it does. If she's a virgin, or is consistent, the guy knows he's not being treated foolishly. If she gave it up to other guys easily (exes or anyone, high n count), but not him then it would hurt him too, no? This is a loop hole (cheating on the sly-- what'd be wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:19 AM
1

They're compatible in every way... but break up because he can't get his dick wait. You guys are really saying he should break up because he can't tap that. I didn't realise you guys were so... filthy. He can just cheat behind her back until she is ready. The others touched on scenarios you did not read; accounting for how the guy's cheating looks considering the girl's sexual history: If she's a virgin, or if she made exes wait just as long; he'd be a dick. Really, he'd probably have to wait. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:17 AM
1

Probably the one of the more sensible replies as demonstrated by not being triggered. You considered all views. Though, how would a high n girl have lots of bad experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:12 AM
1

She wants sex... in a year. An options contract for sex LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:11 AM
1

Yeahhhhh, Kiki, you mad that clear. Ofc, it matters if she was a ho bag. He can agree to her terms and still get some on the side if she suddenly wants to pretend to be celibate with him for a year. Traitor apologist, that's a new one. XD I just presented an argument. I'm just wondering if you have anything other than "betrayal" and "traitor".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:10 AM
1

What about her sexual past, would that change the course of action he should take? Virgin vs high n count? If exes waited just as long vs if exes got it quick?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:07 AM
1

Practical tho! Does her sexual past (scenarios outlined under "interesting spin") make a difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:05 AM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:05 AM
1

Why is it lying? He's not having sex with her for a year and he doesn't have to tell anyone he's having sex with other people. Of course what she did in the past matters. If exes waited just as long, he knows he's not being taken for a ride, if she's a virgin, he can understand her hesitation. If she gave it up for exes very quick, or she just has a very high n count, then eyebrows will be raised. Or the fourth option: 4a, he'll understand and wait; everyone is happy. 4b, he'll realise there's B…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:04 AM
1

Tomato, tomato. I just threw an a scenario, you said it is odd. He would think so too... so do you reckon that'd make him feel more justified in cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 02:00 AM
1

Ofc, but she wants to wait! But do you reckon Her sexual past influences whether he'd wait? If she's: A virgin High n count woman Someone who made exes wait just as long Someone who gave it up for exes much quicker
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:59 AM
1

Well, you're not pressuring her into sex early!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:58 AM
1

If both tell you to wait a year?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:57 AM
1

If she made other bfs wait that long, or if she's a virgin, I imagine he won't use cheating on the sly as a loophole. However, if she has a high n count, or gave it to previous exes very quickly... then I imagine he would as he'd probably feel stupid for being the only guy who needs to wait a year while others probably got it in days or minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:56 AM
1

Well, it shows in terms of the women who have no issue opening their legs quick, it will show that apparently he's an exception to the other men. Making him wait a year... a guy would think he's being taken for a fool if she had no issue giving it for other men quick, or other bfs quick. So he can agree to her face and cheat on the sly until she's ready, then stop cheating when he finally gets it. No harm, no fowl. There is no material issue if she doesn't know, esp when there's no real reason w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:55 AM
1

What I'm saying is... he'll say he will wait, but will get some on the sly while he waits. Well, that sounds like pretty shoddy reasoning, being brutally honest. Virgin and making other boyfriends wait the same, that makes sense. But giving it up for other men quickly and having a high n count, but suddenly for him he has to wait for a year... then he gets told he doesn't need to understand. He, and other men would rightfully think that's BS. He is fully entitled to agree to wait and cheat on he…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:51 AM
1

Maybe they have it now, but he needs to get paste the time lock. Or he's already being smart and meeting his needs until the lady in question becomes holistically compatible. Why wouldn't it be relevant? If she's a virgin or made prior boyfriends wait that long, then perhaps he'd understand and others would tell him its fine. Otherwise if she gave it up quick for previous boyfriends or has a very high n count, then he'll probably feel like a clown being the only one who has to wait and others pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:47 AM
1

What makes you think my opinion is? Plus someone in PPD such as yourself probably doesn't know what objectivity doesn't look like. For instance. Is "hilariously, scarily bad" about my "opinion"? Atm, it looks like you felt the need to get something out as you saw something triggering.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:44 AM
1

I understood it and what you were trying to do. You weren't as subtle as you thought. But if you're patient you'll get the gender flipped thread you're anxious to get. Don't worry, my dude. You'll get to earn the imaginary chick brownie points soon!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 01:41 AM
1

He's not lying to her. He's respecting no sex for a year, just not telling her he's busting his nut else where. Well, it might. If she's a virgin or makes other partners wait, then its probably solid. But if she gave it up for other boyfriends very easily, or other men in general very easily (high n count women), but seemingly you have to wait a year, then you know something's probably up and you'd probably feel like a clown. You'd be in your right to cheat if you'd like. By your value system yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:23 PM
1

And the other cases?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:20 PM
1

Fools who wear their hearts on their sleeves and decide their partner will suddenly forgive them. That's a secret you take to your grave. Especially if they decide to go with someone who gave it up to previous partners quickly, or other guys quickly (high n count women).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:19 PM
1

Not as good otherwise we wouldn't have whiney Black Pillers. Let me be clear, if this man's penis was in proximity to the woman's naked body, let alone in her hands, or her mouth as a stopgap during the 1 year period. I don't think cheating would be on his mind. Not at all. The only thing on his mind would be where to nut. Well, I'm afraid in this case, women who gave it up quickly for prior boyfriends, and especially women who gave it up easy (high n count women) are always going to have a shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:17 PM
1

She dates him, but wants him to wait a whole year for sex whereas she either gave it to prior boyfriends very quickly, or rando men very quickly... doesn't paint a promising picture for how attractive she finds him. If his girlfriend won't meet his needs for a year, then he too can find a temp buffer. Re promiscuous women, the guy likely thinks that and as such finds it odd he's the one guy who must wait 12 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:13 PM
1

Trauma, past abuse, bad experience with a partner all loop under one theme which is understandable. If communicated would make it easy for a partner to be patient. Same with medical issues. Bad decisions in her past, which is associated with high n count or giving it up too early... unlikely to earn sympathy because that's indicating the buffer exists because you reckon the current guy could be another bad decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:09 PM
1

I had the following scenarios in the OP in mind: Does your view on this change depending on if the woman: is a virgin had sex in a previous relationship(s); 1 scenario where prior boyfriends waited a year and 1 scenario where she gave it up quick has a high n count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:07 PM
1

That's true, and that difference in perspective can cause a rift. However, that is how a guy would perceive it. Like I told another redditor, if she can keep secrets well, I would be unaware... unless she's a really dumb cheat. Likewise she wouldn't feel mistreated... unless he is a really dumb cheat. In his view, likely (with the latter 2 cases I mentioned) that he's the only guy who the woman didn't give it up quick for considering either all her prior boyfriends got the "jackpot" quick in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:06 PM
1

Well, one would argue their past absolutely matters as it shows how much she actually values the guy. The virgin and the lady who made prior boyfriends wait long, show he's valued. The high n count and the one that gave it up quick for others indicate he's lesser in some way. So he's within his right to stay and also cheat while waiting too.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:02 PM
1

Surely he'd likely agree and respect her terms more (by not using the cheating loophole) if she's a virgin and made prior boyfriends wait for similar time periods and take it a lot less seriously and use the loophole if she gave it up for prior boyfriends quickly and has a high n count? The latter 2 come across this agreement is exclusively made for him and the others had free/relaxed entry.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:00 PM
2

Fair play... I just don't quite know what to say tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:56 PM
1

I meant, with those situations in mind, how would you take it if you were the guy, if she then proceeded to request you wait for a year? The idea was, would you respect the idea of waiting if: she's a virgin has a high n count made prior boyfriends wait that long gave it up for prior boyfriends much quicker
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:55 PM
1

do you feel the woman's sexual background makes a difference in the man's willingness to cheat incognito? That is, if she's a virgin, has a high n count, or had prior relationships where there was sex (where partners may have waited a year or significantly less)? What about this
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:53 PM
1

Rahhhhhh, wait till marriage. Would you marry young?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:52 PM
1

View won't change. This is in regards to her sexual history under "interesting spin"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:52 PM
1

You didn't say anything meaningful except poorly try to bait me into a "gotcha" moment, then again poorly tried to pivot into a "but I was trying this". As I mentioned, sharpen your skills for the next thread. It isn't fun walking circles around yet another PPD Dunning-Kruger.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:51 PM
1

Maybe they have insane chemistry that that they never had. If he's smart, he can cheat with some sex workers or something well out of the area that people they mutually know frequent- he needs to be smart about it. Not be a dingbat. What I had in mind is the scenario in the OP: If she's a virgin If she has a high n count If she had prior relationships; 1 case where partners waited a year, and 1 where she gave it up swiftly Would these change anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:49 PM
1

Well, it depends. The "don't be a dipshit and sleep around" might resonate stronger if the lady in question is a virgin or made prior partners wait for a similar length of time. However, it begins to be taken significantly less seriously if she gave it up for prior boyfriends swiftly or if she has a high n count. In which case, it comes across that this waiting period exclusively exists for the gent in question and could fuck with his mental health... in which case, no one would truly blame him …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:45 PM
1

Err, actually their sexual past does matter. That is, how seriously the other party will take them and whether they choose to cheat/stay/leave. If they are a virgin, or made prior boyfriends wait for a similar length of time, they guy would likely get it, one would imagine. However, if they swiftly gave it up in previous relationships or had high n counts, then I have my doubts that the guy would choose to stay, or take them seriously. They might feel the woman doesn't find them attractive, thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:41 PM
1

What examples do you have in mind that might not seem rational to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:38 PM
2

At the same time, most guys will feel like she views them as unattractive hence she makes them wait compared to the other guys she gave it up for swiftly in comparison. That's the issue high n count women will face in such scenarios. As for women who gave it up quick in previous relationships, it'll be similar too, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:38 PM
1

If she's good at keeping secrets, I wouldn't know now would I! Likewise, if he's good at keeping secrets, she wouldn't know. Actually, the factors do matter. If she's a virgin or made prior boyfriends wait for the same time, then it makes sense. But if she gave it up for previous boyfriends very quickly or has a high n count, then he should consider cheating. What she did before absolutely matters, gives the guy an indication if he's being taken for a fool. Rather than feeling that he's seen as …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:36 PM
1

If she's a virgin, or made prior boyfriends wait for that amount of time it makes sense. But if she gave it up quick for prior boyfriends or has a high n count, then of course the guy is wasting his time and should absolutely consider the cheating route.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:33 PM
1

Nah, paaji. In this scenario, you won't even get a year of handys or blows, NO sexual releases from her at all from the year. Why else is the guy in the hypothetical scenario considering cheating! Blocking the number isn't going to work since you need to be in the relationship for a year. That's like being a month in, then you cancel then you start back where you started... you'd have been better of staying and cheating without her knowing for that year. So her sexual past (whether she was a vir…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:31 PM
1

Or he doesn't want her to feel that her decision pushed him away. There's more than one way to look at it than the person with meat dangling between their legs is automatically in the wrong. Though, you didn't address if the woman's sexual history matters. A virgin, sure he might choose to respect it and not cheat, similar if she was in prior relationships where there was sex and other partners waited for that long too. Now if she was in prior relationships and gave it up quickly or has a high n…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:27 PM
1

Okay...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:23 PM
1

Opting for leave then? Or cheat if he does stay?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:21 PM
1

Fair play.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:20 PM
1

You talking about the hypothetical scenario or the thread in niceguys?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:20 PM
1

That cracked me tf up, even then she said maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:19 PM
1

I left it vague so you guys can run with the scenarios you'd like. Seemingly a lot of people here seemingly ran with the man is in the wrong xD
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:19 PM
1

In this scenario would the woman's background make a difference? Does your view on this change depending on if the woman: is a virgin had sex in a previous relationship(s) has a high n count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:18 PM
1

Part of acting like an adult is finding solutions to the problem at hand. If a man wants to keep the relationship and have the human touch... cheat and keep it hidden until she's ready. Its completely logical. Now, if she's a virgin, he's being a dick. If she has a high n count and suddenly he's the guy that needs to wait, hell yes, this man needs to enjoy himself while he's the guy who should wait for some rando reason. If she had prior relationships where there was sex it is tricky. If other p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:17 PM
1

Technically it is violated if she finds out. If he does it well, she won't find out. Its practical, and many others may do that, but they're not in the relationship, are they? ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:14 PM
1

Educate me then, brudda.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:12 PM
1

Isn't she more than orifices tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:12 PM
1

Depends on the guy. If its a guy who can keep it under wraps, someone who can STFU and not get caught, it won't matter. If it is one of those fools that wear their heart on their sleeve, then it will be mute because the idiot will let it slip well before the 5 years American sitcom style.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:11 PM
1

You women seriously overestimate how good the hand feels! In this scenario, I think he would be happy if he got even a blowjob. Well, whatever the reason, if the woman had a high n count, most men are going to feel disrespected or "ripped off", so they'll probably cheat or leave tbh, regardless of their reasons (unless they are the wimpy guys).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:10 PM
1

The heart wants what the heart wants... same with the purple one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:07 PM
1

I anticipated the high n count would draw the short draw here XD
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:07 PM
1

Now, what about the other 2 scenarios, the bits under "interesting spin"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:06 PM
1

Reviewing the interesting spin, what's your take: Does your view on this change depending on if the woman: is a virgin had sex in a previous relationship(s) has a high n count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:05 PM
1

Do you think her sexual history will make a difference here? By that on whether or not he should cheat?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:04 PM
1

Moral philosophy is a beautiful subject, I wouldn't like seeing a living Dunning-Kruger in the PPD desecrate it. Further, you're backtracking, if you really did attempt to use an analogy, your execution was horrible. If you really are keen to discuss the female version, you can wait until I make the thread. In the mean time, I recommend you polish your skills for the next time. ;*
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:03 PM
2

Thank you, someone who sees it as the grey area it is. But one thing, this is not my situation, my guy! I clearly stated this is a hypothetical situation inspired by what I saw on the niceguys reddit. Jheez, I bet many (especially the usual angry feminist/bloop of PPD) really do think this is my situation! haha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:00 PM
1

They could be compatible because people aren't just their genitals, y'know.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:57 PM
1

I think some of you really don't fathom why your hand won't do it. Fleshlight... the only person who mentioned something proper, depends on the fleshlight, tbh. But he might actually wanna thrust and it depends if he is shameless/bold enough to purchase the various mounts etc. Might be less embarrassing for him to cheat, depending on his self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:56 PM
1

Obviously the man agreed, but intends to cheat until she's ready hence the loophole. But, the interesting spin is whether her sexual background would make a difference on whether he'll respect her wishes, or make use of the loophole. Basically will he go through with it if the woman: - is a virgin - has a high n count - had sex in prior relationships; would the waiting time of exes make a difference if they were the same or significantly shorter than his?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:54 PM
1

Would it make a difference on whether you choose to respect her wishes or if you decide to cheat until she's ready? This assumes a scenario where you choose to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:51 PM
1

Why don't the interesting spins make a difference to the situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:51 PM
1

Maybe they could, maybe they can't. Or he's doing the smart thing, no? But the part many ignore: do you feel her potential sexual history determines whether he'd go through with it? If she's a virgin or has a high n count, would he likely be patient or just go ahead with it? What if she had a prior relationship; would it make a difference if other partners waited the same amount of time, or if she gave it up in a significantly shorter amount of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:50 PM
1

She'd never find out if the guy is smart about it! Poor girl? Poor guy you mean! Man has to wait 12 months, like an animal?!?!?!?!! Jokes aside, do you reckon the woman's sexual past would influence whether the man is more likely to wait or go ahead with the incognito cheating until she's ready? That is if she's a virgin, has a high n count, or had sex in prior relationships (her exes could've waited for 12 months or significantly less)?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:48 PM
1

She's telling him to be celibate for a year?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?! Listen, if masturbation was that much of a godsend to men, women would not have to deal with all the shitty men. PUA, TRP and a lot of these manosphere sexual strategy shiz would not exist. We would not have the Black Pill boys if self handies did the job! Elliot Rodger included!! Bloody hell, probably Epstein, Weinstein X-Stein, etc would've probably never happened if all it took was some alone time to play 5 on 1! Jokes (semi*) asi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:45 PM
1

Sounds like a man who knows about diversification!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:39 PM
1

You're suggesting just walk, give an ultimatum? She's not a car! XD
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:38 PM
1

And would her sexual background (or lack of) make it more easier to justify the cheating? That is if she's a virgin, has a high n count or had sex in prior relationships (if previous partners waited a year or significantly shorter than that)?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:38 PM
1

If the woman is a virgin, had a prior relationships involving sex (did the partners wait the same amount of time, or significantly shorter), or has a high n count... does that change anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:36 PM
1

I hear you Amazonian! But it is him getting his release while respecting her. A nice loophole. Though, the other part was ignored... does the woman's sexual background make a difference here: whether she's a virgin, had prior relationships where she had sex (did the partners wait the same time or not)... or is she a high n count gal? Would any of those make a difference on whether he'd feel justified cheating incognito, or even be encouraged, or if he'd be discouraged and be persuaded to wait?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:35 PM
2

It might hurt her, it might not. As per the OP the only boundary we know is she wants to wait for a year. Though, her sexual background probably does come into it. Is she a virgin? Did she have sex with prior partners and how long did they wait (same amount of time or significantly shorter)? And ofc, the most damning... is she a high n count gal?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:31 PM
-1

You guys are basically objectifying her and trying to act like you're not. The dude in this situation has a perfectly good loophole. Cheat until she's ready. That's a easy solution. If she's a virgin, obviously he's being disrespectful. If its a woman who has made other partners wait similar times, then odd, but he'd need to bite the bullet... or risk looking scummy. But if she gave up to everyone else quick and not him; he's within his right to cheat until she's ready. If its a high n count wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:29 PM
1

Makes sense. Whereas with the high n count gal... well, nothing to say, I guess. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:26 PM
2

I suppose it assumes why she wants to wait. Which depends on her background, I guess. For instance is she a virgin, did she have sex in prior relationships (did other guys wait longer/significantly shorter), does she have a significantly high n count?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:25 PM
1

How is it any of those things? She has her boundary respected, no pressure to have sex and waits for a year. He gets his physical release until she's ready to step up and do it for him.. Everyone is happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:37 PM
0

What do you propose he should do?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:36 PM
1

Perhaps you're one of those overly sensitive people (like many of PPD; red and blue alike) that hear "bad words" and assume their users using them to describe certain groups are automatically assholes. I don't know how often I have to say this. Your bloody truth is not the universal truth, that is your unique experiences, your anecdotes are not representative of the overall truth. Same with the OP. The OP, who do I mean? You know, Mr Dingbat who contradicted himself about how TRP helps him get w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:36 PM
0

So you're saying they're not fully compatible simply because he can't get his willy get immediately like he wants. Didn't realize some of you in PPD are okay with objectifying women like this under certain scenarios which aren't exactly black and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:30 PM
1

Very good point. Though, do you think this view might change depending on her previous sexual history? In that would it matter if the woman asking the man to wait a year before having sex: - is a virgin - had sex in a previous relationship(s) - has a high n count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:28 PM
0

You can address it in the relevant thread rather than derailing this one to get your "gotcha" moment, my friend. And don't worry: the future is female!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:27 PM
0

If he'd like to stay with her, but use the loophole to get his release while having the rest until she's ready... what's the harm? Why do you feel her history wouldn't make a difference? Her being a virgin might make him more sympathetic and less likely to cheat. Previous relationships coin toss since if other partners waited the same/similar times, he'd probably bite the bullet. He might just break up eventually/cheat if she gave it up sooner. High n count... will almost certainly be cheated on…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:25 PM
1

With the loophole, he can. He could just get it from elsewhere, then stop when she's ready to give it to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:23 PM
-1

Perhaps they're fully compatible? Minus the having to wait a year for sexual relations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:22 PM
1

Ah yes, you are woman and I hear you roar! There could be other explanations apart from your oversimplification. Perhaps he doesn't want her to feel like she's not enough, or her boundary/rule is pushing him away when everything is perfect sans the wait. The cheating in this case would be just until he's ready and a nice incognito loophole for him to get his physical release. Everyone wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:21 PM
0

What boundaries?! Boundary: wait a year before the couple has sex. Man needs a release... he cheats for the year to get a release until his girlfriend is ready; he doesn't pressure her. Everyone is happy. Provided he's not a dingbat and gets caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:19 PM
1

It is not necessarily wrong to, as you put it "play some sort of lawyerly thing" where you're aware your partner is under the impression that the relationship's exclusive. What you described is gaslighting. The lawyerly thing would be to establish that you never agreed to exclusivity! If you did, then you shot yourself in the foot there and need to resort to ninja/spy tactics to hide the infidelities to get your release while you wait for the year to elapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:18 PM
1

As per the OP, in this hypothetical scenario both parties get along perfectly... except the sex time limit. So can't the man use a dishonest means to get his release until she's ready? He can hide it, that way no one is hurt. Surely that is better than nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:14 PM
1

So is that a yay on he should cheat?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:13 PM
1

Is our chap is as efficient as a super elite ninja spy, she will never know! What she doesn't know, won't hurt her. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:12 PM
1

You raise compelling points. With that said, would her history make any difference? That is if she was either a virgin, had sex in prior relationships (would the time she gave it up to exes make a difference), or has a high n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:11 PM
1

Of course, he needs to hide. A man cheating is not exactly extremely socially acceptable now, is it? He'll be vilified, cancelled etc XD
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:10 PM
1

In this imperfect set up, shall the brother cheat?! And does the lady's history (virgin/having sex in prior relationships/high n count) make any difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:08 PM
0

Interesting takes. Re previous relationship, would the waiting times she made her exes wait be the determining factor? As for the last 2 under "interesting spins", what makes you distrust them more than the virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:07 PM
0

Having said that, yay or nay on cheating during the waiting period?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:04 PM
0

Re waiting for a year, would you say her history makes a difference? Would you be willing to wait for a year if she's a virgin? What about if she had sex in previous relationships* or has a high n count? *You can choose to speculate about the wait times for those. Would any of these scenarios make the cheating and concealing it more/less acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:04 PM
1

Fair play.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:02 PM
1

And do the other scenarios influence anything? u/Lameador can chime in too: If the woman: - had sex in a previous relationship(s) - has a high n count u/januaryphilosopher, you reckon sexual trauma would be a reason for the waiting period? Even with the above histories in mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 01:01 PM
1

You can ask this question in your own thread, I was planning to make an thread with the genders flipped some time later. Though, if you were looking for some "gotcha" moment, I'm afraid you're not going to find it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:57 PM
0

If that was the best solution, I doubt the scenario I drew inspiration from niceguys would exist, nor would a lot of unfortunate circumstances women experience exist. Funnily enough, PUA, TRP, The Black Pill... a lot of these groups would not exist if rubbing one out would do the job perfectly. The only established boundary I outlined in the OP was the woman asked the man to wait for 12 months. Why shouldn't he be allowed to feel that human touch? You're suggesting if they get along in all aspec…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:55 PM
1

What boundary is being violated here. I'm not sure you understand the point. She's not being pressured and he's getting his release and keeping his mouth shut. Win all around.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:51 PM
0

Couldn't you argue what they don't know won't hurt them? The guy will be much happier after getting his release and won't be harassing her for sex and will make his wait much easier. If he just STFU during the wait, no one gets hurt. Re the history, I defined elements of the history specifically to consider: Do things change if the woman: - is a virgin - had sex in a previous relationship(s) - has a high n count Does #1 make it easier, and strengthen your conviction? Does point #2 do the same if…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:49 PM
0

So you'd say they should break up despite being fully compatible except the guy can't get his willy for at least 12 months?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:43 PM
1

Kinda wasting the guy's time tbh. I mean, either she should let him have sex with other people until she's ready or just end the relationship if she's never going to be ready.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:42 PM
-1

In this instance... what compatibility? The reasonings so far boil down to objectification. You can't break up with someone over sexual compatibility if you haven't had the opportunity to see if you are sexually compatible! Look at the post I replied to where Kiki explicitly commented "The woman's history changes absolutely nothing." The OP (me) is discussing a hypothetical situation inspired by what I saw on the niceguys section. Hence I asked if Kiki felt if the woman's history influence anyth…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:39 PM
-2

Is your oversimplification all there is to cheating? It is probably more complicated despite your obvious antipathy to adultery. For instance, why is she choosing to make him wait for a year? If she's a virgin, one would say it is very understandable, and presumably other people would tell him he should respect it. He may even feel like a scumbag for considering cheating. However, if she had sex in previous relationships it depends. If they also waited a year, then it'll be a similar case. But i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:32 PM
0

I laughed at that scenario so much. But in regards to the situation as I brought it up ITT, what's your take on it? Do you think the man should feel stronger about it depending on her history? Especially depending on whether she's a virgin/had sex in prior relationships/has a high n count?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:27 PM
1

I don't care much for a Reddit argument. I'm merely asking you about what you classify as emotional maturity. In the OP I mentioned that the gent was asked to wait for a whole year. They connect in every way, but he can't wait for a year. So cheating until she's ready seems like a good compromise. Do you not think her history backs a difference to anything? Would your opinion be different if the genders of each party (the person who can't wait and the person asking the other to wait) were flippe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:25 PM
1

I left it open so you can speculate what conditions would and would not be acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 12:21 PM
-3

What sort of emotional maturity is required to wait to have sex for a whole year? Does your view on this change depending on if the woman: is a virgin had sex in a previous relationship(s) has a high n count
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:31 AM
1

That's an interesting point. By your definition, is not still not cheating if it is an exclusive relationship but not a sexual one yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:29 AM
2

That's interesting, what would be a "perfect fucking unicorn" (XD) in every other aspect that would make you willing to wait for a year? Would there be a minimum threshold?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:28 AM
-19

Breaking up with them due to not having sex here and now, that's effectively saying you see them as a biological being to bring orgasms, not a human being with feelings and what they mean to you. In this scenario, it'd be purely physical while the dude waits, he won't be falling in love with anyone else! Even though they connect and are perfect in every other way, except the man needs a release? Now, now, you're telling me that the woman's history won't change anything, not even slightly? As I m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:26 AM
-3

Why would it be wrong? Hypothetically the guy would not be sleeping with the woman for 12 months, so he's not really cheating on her, physically, since he's not actually getting anything to cheat on! As I outlined in the OP, everything is perfect in the scenario excluding the wait time. Rather than dump someone who could otherwise be a great life partner because you're arguably reducing them to their genitals, why not respect their boundaries and yours at the same time i.e. the man can cheat whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:23 AM
-26

Isn't that reducing them to their genitals? What's the harm in the dude cheating on her whenever he needs a release until she's ready? Also does her history matter? (see the bottom of the post)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:19 AM
0

I was calling out a redditor that was triggered that had no intention to debate with the actual OP. They replied purely out of emotion, and it was amusing. I explicitly stated that I did give them the benefit of the doubt despite the initial impressions of their posts until I reach the post which you replied to. People disagreeing on the sub isn't a sign of being triggered, I never asserted this. You assumed that I did. However, reading skills help you detect which replies are have actual discus…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:16 AM
2

There are more women, however. The sample size for women is larger compared to men. I don't think you won like you thought. 1953 indeed, but the idea is to go through each study and see of the trend continued, not the one outdated one. But I can't say I blame you. You don't have time nor are you bored enough to go through it, neither do I. I can't speak for you, seeing as you cared enough to look at least one source of his, but I just am not invested enough to review each of his sources and laug…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:10 AM
7

Normally I like to demonstrate how people in the sub don't use stats properly TRP or TBP... but with the sheer quantity of links you posted....... I am not bored enough to go through each one. You win.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:06 AM
1

Hell yes. I'd tell you why, but my female self and I are too busy gazing lovingly into each other's eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 10:04 AM
1

u/Zofious Tagged him so he'd see this Tbh, I found him listing all that stuff (meditation, therapy, being fit, earing 6 figs, and good skin) quite random when all I asked was: "Also nothing re tackling what you called entitlement? Further they expect they deserve certain men just for existing... aren't you doing the same? More so after swallowing TRP but the added bonus is you feel know now know the "true path" to get them?" And does he expect these women to do similar? Though while retrieving t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:02 AM
0

I never said not get attached, they lose their anxiety. With that the common idea is just to self development (commonly "life"; go to the gym or only go to the gym because almost all of them don't know anything else). They probably want to form attachments, but they just do not trust women, its literally in their sidebar. They believe women still retain the temperament of teenage girls hence their notion of "women are the oldest teenagers in the house". They never ended up there because they wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:51 AM
1

How do you mean? You don't seem to want to answer this question in depth it appears.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:38 AM
8

I puked in my mouth when I read "Buzzfeed".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:33 AM
0

But if they want men, they have to accept there will be strings attached with a new prospect. Probably even transmen... or anyone romantically interested in them. So in a way, no. Anyone will be "nice" to them in the hopes of getting laid. Now, if you mean not like the nonsense you see in r/niceguys then you have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:32 AM
1

And when did he make any direct statement to validate an assumption that he was a cold and uncaring person? He worded it badly, but he probably meant he doesn't have any emotions about how women are i.e., he's not going to get high strung about it. Generally the trend is pre TRP guys get emotional (fret, overthink etc) about women's behaviours as they don't know what they are doing or what they are like and why they are doing it. Post TRP they feel they have the answer for the latter 2, like a t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:19 AM
-2

I'm sure the these women you speak of will find a nice trans man to love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:11 AM
0

I didn't ask if you do any of those things, my guy. For some reason I don't think therapy and meditation are on the top of women's bucket list, but sure. Anyone can say "make 6 figures", but there's also the status element of it and what have you- but I don't really air my business on PPD unless its relevant to the discussion. The fact you listed those things might make some wonder how confident you really are, is it fully confident or still in the fake it till you make it stage? From a male per…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:05 AM
1

Let me guess, pre TRP never worked, post TRP she took an interest? Also nothing re tackling what you called entitlement? Further they expect they deserve certain men just for existing... aren't you doing the same? More so after swallowing TRP but the added bonus is you feel know now know the "true path" to get them?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:49 AM
1

Totally, like assuming someone is a cold and uncaring person, then based on your assumption choosing to ask if they always this way. :) He went with his assumptions, and it helped his dating life. That's it. Now that you got your Sesame Street style piece about not making judging people prematurely and how to interact with him out of the way, feel better? More empowered? (I think those chick points are increasing, well done bro!)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:47 AM
1

I'll let you read the string of replies to the OP and figure it out. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:44 AM
-1

Didn't look that way. 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:41 AM
2

Well... no. In the eye of society, it is generally fine. You just hear the loudest people cry about standards. But the truth is no one gives a shit. People still perpetuate those standards, even our male standards for men because most people want those. The loud mouths who cry about it, including the people in PPD who get triggered by everything, their opinions on the matter do not matter. You can trick yourself in thinking they do if you surround yourself with a circle that surrounds itself wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:40 AM
0

You're right, he should be as happy as Santa Claus on Prozac getting laid in Disney Land and assume that everyone has the best intentions! Though, if going with TRP notions worked for him, why should he change it? You don't think you'll get chick points for pretending you care about what sort of person he is based on his views on women, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:31 AM
2

What is an "actual nice guy"? O.o
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:28 AM
3

Ahh, the PPD "wahmen really have da cantroll ere" fantasy to these triggering stories. I love seeing these predictable replies to these stories haha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:27 AM
4

We've gone to "females" instead of "women" now lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:25 AM
1

Let me guess, your friends see through these sort of guys, right?👀
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:25 AM
-1

Ahh, so you were triggered! haha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:23 AM
0

Your standard... so you're basically like what TRP says modern women do. Wat...?! How would she show you she should be taken seriously? Entitlement as in?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:22 AM
1

As if anyone on this sub would know much about where higher quality women would flock. In this sub its usually about disagreeing with someone who says something triggering. :X
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:21 AM
1

Sounds like cope unless you're certain he's stayed in a small area populated with a certain type of woman. Also his idea of being an asshole might be different to your understanding and when he starts calling women "bitches" while in his head he thinks he's being edgy, mean etc it probably comes across as differently, not so bitter-- it can happen. Perhaps more authentic. But sure, I guess if women are wonderful, women are wonderful.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:20 AM
1

Care to substantiate your argument with examples? It sounds more like something from a cult/tribe with some religious and Marxist (ironic lol) overtones. Whether you personally are doing well or not is irrelevant, but thank you for feeling the urge to point out you are one of the winners. The only impression you're giving is the side the OP supports, and perhaps you, are just uncomfortable with globalization, capitalism, and the resulting cosmopolitism that has been trending higher. Well, as it …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 02:10 AM
0

Its fun to poke fun at people here at watch them take stuff seriously while pretending to be experts to rationalise their biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 11:20 PM
0

Dunning-Kruger effect... making tinfoil hat predictions about the end times! I'm not going to take wacko conspiracy theories seriously, I'll call them what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 11:18 PM
1

You sure that's what it is? Or just a certain % of you say this because you don't know how to deal with social changes, notably globalisation and capitlaism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 11:16 PM
2

Without it, what would change?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 10:56 PM
1

Why would you say they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 09:56 PM
1

Yes, going into what the subject would feel of they find out about the woman's high numbers. Mileage I'm terms of how they would see her number count, not women are cars. You seem to present as a high n count person or someone who would like to be hence the shaming of men that would prefer to avoid such women. What's wrong with these women going with men that have no issues with their high number? That culture is mostly enforced by you gals, so yeahhhhhhh.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 12:48 PM
1

We're talking about women ITT hence the focus on women. Whatever you feel, that's the thinking behind the guys who really want to know. Perhaps high n count women are better off without these guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 12:42 PM
0

Support from from his tinfoil crew?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 12:40 PM
2

You can talk about it, but a chunk of you get sensitive about it fkr some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 12:38 PM
0

No, I'm just telling you the basics of research methods as many in PPD only know buzzwords.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 12:35 PM
2

How could i answer your question when I was from another post before I even replied to the post? I speculated, but now I really do think you feel called out by the remark about high n count women. XD I commented already, ironically in the post you replied to initially: As for the women being penalized for going wild by letting every mother husker party inside her and men getting reward for partying inside every woman... it is what is. I don't notice men being penalized as much. Except by people …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:47 AM
1

I did not compare women to cars, I resent that. I compared women having many partners to a car with lots of mileage. I also did not call women hoes, this is another lie. I subject whereby he would feel she was "hoeing around". As for men having lots of sexual partners... I'm sure I commented, no? Why would I be insecure about women being sexually liberated? I simply made a case why a woman who made full case of her liberation to gain a n count comparable to the net worth of the the Forbes top 5 …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:39 AM
2

Why? If men don't want to go with the town slut, they shouldn't be tricked into it. Some men feel strongly about it. No need to normalise something at the expense of men's preference; if he finds out later down the line it could be worse, especially if he knows he would have never gone with her had he known she went wild before meeting him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:28 AM
0

I suppose it'd be easier to take you more seriously if it didn't sound like you took a cocktail of drugs... which you need to list btw because sounds like an exciting trip.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:24 AM
6

I won't get into the Will and Jada thing because I don't know them. The general reply you'll get if it is female to male abuse, but you'd get a starkly different reaction if it was the inverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:21 AM
-1

And just like about every PPD I bet you saw some numbers in a a few studies, read conclusion line in the abstract and ran with your own narrative based on that with the red pill tin foil hat of this societal decline that isn't happening-- just a bunch of nuts (TRP and PPD) who are afraid of uncertainty (the future). Even more so as many of you probably do not interact with the community/society or get much fresh air!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:15 AM
1

I suppose there's that sense that with the 000s of men she did, she'll probably have done many sex acts with them that she'll never do with you. So there's that sense of loss too-- I suppose in that case a high n count woman really should go for someone who doesn't care rather than moan about the insecure men who care about their n count or worse... lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:12 AM
1

If a man doesn't want a woman with a lot of mileage (high n count), that's his right. He probably doesn't want to be associated with someone that half/most the city/town/village/area fucked. Of course, there are guys who wouldn't care about a high n count. You can call men who don't want them insecure if it helps you sleep at night, but most men don't want a spot where everyone's planted their seed/flag. I suppose there's an element of "she'll miss hoeing around" or during time apart she'll have…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:09 AM
1

I appreciate what you're saying. Though, there is a good chance that those female friends probably tell each other things they don't tell you... perhaps their true partner count which includes every sexual encounter you may not be privy to?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:02 AM
-1

You could make that assertion. All peer reviews do is check if the methodology was sound and that the results aren't obviously biased. You'll find some interesting commentary in the discussions section, which many usually ignore, and more so when you look at all the stats. It depends who you want to believe. Do you want to believe researchers because you're throwing buzzwords like "peer reviewed" and "validity" without examining the methodology yourself and looking through other studies (a lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:01 AM
1

As if women didn't have options in a modern society. Unless you are saying it was better for men when women had no say in relationships and mate selection?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:49 AM
3

For the love of God, go outside and interact with the community... breath some fresh air. Take some of PPD with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:47 AM
1

Suddenly your other post makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:45 AM
1

One could argue that they play a role with you all the time, so its the same, no? They could be acting as the person they want to be while become that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:42 AM
1

Probably saw some dumb psychologist, when what these guys really need is a psychiatrist. Basically someone who can hear them out, do all the talking AND has the option to prescribe medication.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:41 AM
2

Therapy is a scam for men... so you're one of those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:39 AM
1

Sure, why not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:38 AM
2

Why exactly? And is it specifically female promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:36 AM
1

What... ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:34 AM
1

Be ready for the most tinfoil hat shit you'll read.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:33 AM
1

Women can afford to be pickier?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:31 AM
1

People could still choose to lie even if you collect the data anonymously. There's no real reason, but you're assuming all respondents are going to be rational actors here. Tho with some women in this sub, it is probably very believable they have low partner counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:28 AM
1

Like assuming their experience isn't representative of other women because our biases would rather us believe women have relatively low number counts on average?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:23 AM
1

Tho tbh, women can lie and you'd be none the wiser like one in this sub who was being sus about her number including "what counts".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:22 AM
0

Ratchet, damn. Someone's feeling catty haha. Tho, what's that other podcast the reds like to cite? The one with the 2 hotties talking to each other about their experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:20 AM
6

Significantly more than 3 then?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:18 AM
5

Firstly why would you listen to people in THIS subreddit? XD
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:16 AM
2

Never said she was hostile; take it up with the chap who said she was. It was a straightforward question, my guy. Her reluctance to answer it in a straightforward manner seemed "off", to be brutally honest. Apparently it seemed that way to other guys, who care about n count, too. I'm assuming you don't care about n count, so probably a non issue for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:05 AM
1

The app would not out them. The app would cross reference their details with the database (which could be anonymous, that would not necessarily contain any info save that X transitioned to Y). What this would achieve is that if users decide that under their "preferences" settings to not display trans users, then trans users would not show up at all. It saves one party from feeling they were "transfished" as you say and the other from being on the other side of a transphobically motivated prejudi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 01:12 AM
0

How true is it now? It is a 2013 study and things may have changed in a decade. Though, going by social trends and how people seem to be LESS promiscuous compared to 30+ years ago to the point where discussing number counts is a bit if a sensitive topic (no matter what it is), I imagine it might be the same. Perhaps a higher if you go by the fact that the self-help industry is booming alongside the fact that the dating industry only seems to get stronger (yet that study indicates college age wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 10:49 PM
1

Ngl, that does seem suspect and only seeks t valid their paranoia that there's a hivemind looking to silence them. Concurrently it infantilizes the groups they are against implying they need special protection against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 10:01 PM
1

Of course not. Transfishing is immoral, one could argue dating apps should have an option to automatically filter them out for people who just don't want to see pretend males/females.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 09:59 PM
1

You say that while misrepresenting what I said. Bad form, sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 09:57 PM
1

In other words: - BPs going HAM ITT due to small dick energy; they think it will get extra chick points to overcome said energy - RPs going HAM due to the small dick energy that took them to RP - Feminists of PPD not comprehending the topic as expected, but just saying things to rile up anyone who triggered them in previous topics
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 09:54 PM
1

Well, those shouldn't be banned. If one can't use their detective skills , especially after using OLD for a while, that is their fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:39 PM
1

Trans targeting hysteria is based on the higher trans death rate, which is fair... but there are less of them generally. Less trans, and if more are offed for some reason or another, its going to look bad. Your list, though it encourages heightism is already in use in an apps called Bumble.. How many cases are successfully prosecuted when the accuser says "I thought she was biologically born a she", then you completely disregarded the other challenges that would come with a male coming forward. …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:36 PM
1

What's off topic about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:20 PM
1

Why sinister? They could be treated as a protected group I'm the eyes of the law i.e. harsher penalties. Or it could be used exclusively for the dating app purposes etc, or perhaps it can be rape by deception if someone slept with them under the pretence they were cis?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:18 PM
1

Any reason why?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:16 PM
1

Explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:15 PM
1

Alleged. Discourages fake reports, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:13 PM
1

I'd say so. Just in case the guys get rattled, that what chingness left out, perhaps intentionally knowing the divisiveness in this sub (I'm in the UK too), is the police can choose to disclose out at their discretion. They won't disclose to any Tom, Dick, and Harry that asks. In other words, even if they investigated and they clear you, they will just probably decline i.e. subtly hint that there's nothing there.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 07:19 PM
1

ITT I see men who hammer hard in the blue because they feel they will get brownie points to overcome their SDE. I also see men who went to the red to exact sexual justice/vengeance because AWALT and they miss out with the blue way because of their SDE unlike the golden days before feminism. Then the feminists of PPD with no reading comprehension who are seeking retaliation for being triggered in other threads. Oh PPD, never change.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 07:03 PM
1

You don't find it it unsettling you can sentence people to life in prison without being 100% certain? Basically stripping one of their rights of their civil rights without being 100% certain? Naturally we have evidence such as DNA etc which make some cases more solid than others. But in certain cases, no. My reply does address what you said, I don't think you understood the train of thought. I notice this is a trend with the ones who reply with their emotions rather than their brain. Especially …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 03:11 PM
1

Unsettling, no? It's much easier to believe a woman than a man is basically what he's saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 11:39 AM
1

It could also be people who have high conflict personalities that have mentally ill tendencies. You're guaranteeing she would be caught out, but that's not something you can say with certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 10:05 AM
3

Or our assumptions are right and your number is significantly higher. Having to define cheating, the the classic "young and immature" alongside you indicating you're the sort that wonders what counts... kinda sus.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:44 AM
1

I gave you an outline of what he had in mind most likely. The notion is being accused will ruin the man's life on top of that regardless if they are caught out. What sort of people? Who knows. Maybe highly strung women or those with something like BPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:35 AM
2

You may very well be more promiscuous than you let on. Even more so if you're really loose with "what counts" and if you want to save eface by avoiding the portrayal that you're a high n count lady who might be concerned about other people's views. Or the idea of a high n count appeals to you but you don't like it is demonised.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 02:04 AM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 02:00 AM
1

Apparently you do hence you needed to reply to his comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 01:58 AM
1

With all due respect, with u/Smitten_Squire's example in mind, you may very well fall for the "act" of a scorned ex that may plan it out very well. Elaborating on that, she could make sure she purposely creates a mess while harming and then calls the police then boom accusation. I'm imaging you're probably empathetic. In this example, it is likely your empathy will probably blind you from seeing what's going on especially with the harm on her body. Or that bodily harm could be created help from …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:43 AM
10

I reckon we should also have a false rape allegation list. It is important for people to know if because of they, or someone they know, could be accused purely because of their gender. There also needs to be a transitioned list. No one should be catfished because someone doesn't want to disclose they are trans. Mostly impacts men. Perhaps a dating app can flag a trans by matching their pic to their ID and notify other users they are trans. All great ideas?!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:33 AM
2

Someone feels called out. I'm sure u/LetsGetSomeSales didn't intentionally call you out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:20 AM
3

It seems plausible. Especially since I'm pretty sure I saw a reply here she highlighted alarming line for guys that care about that: "what counts". 3 could be a stock number because it happens to be the same number would be the "low" number her husband would say, which might be a low ball considering "what counts".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:19 AM
1

Good to hear! I'm not here to judge. In naturally inquisitive and curious by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:13 PM
8

Your answers seemed to be intentionally vague hence the follow up questions and why others here assumed you probably had a way higher count.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 06:53 PM
1

Like your blatant attempt to misrepresent what he meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 05:04 PM
3

Or you're being dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 01:24 PM
21

And prior?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 09:08 AM
1

Or you're being purposely dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 09:05 AM
2

You're doing an amazing job showing that apathy working.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 09:03 AM
5

I'm pretty sure you're fully aware of how it is so lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:48 AM
11

In contrast to your husband were you promiscuous and do you not regard sex as sacred?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:44 AM
5

Now you're being dishonest. You know what the purpose of the analogy was.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:35 AM
6

Yet somehow body count feels inappropriate to ask lest you get accused of comparing a wife to an object?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:34 AM
19

Are you subtly indicating that you are different?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:32 AM
49

As does your reaction to the statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 07:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter