~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twenty year old chicks do not want forty year old guys...even if they are richWhy the fuck is everybody replying to me as if i actually wasn't trolling hard? x'D | /r/ExRedPill | 20/01/21 02:35 PM |
| -1 | Twenty year old chicks do not want forty year old guys...even if they are richWtf | /r/ExRedPill | 20/01/21 12:32 PM |
| -1 | Twenty year old chicks do not want forty year old guys...even if they are richYou're lieing. I lost my date to prom to a 5'9, 140lbs 38 year old man named Roger. I wasn't the only one. During last days of High School you'd only see late 30s/early 40s dudes making out with all the hot seniors. As we all know, age differences like this in dating are normal and commonly observed. When i arrived college, i was immediatly told that all the chicks were either frat guys or older guys propriety. My sister brought home her new boyfriend once who turned out to be my dad's long time… | /r/ExRedPill | 20/01/21 10:10 AM |
| 9 | Rollout Myassy mumbles something idiotic in response to "cuck joke" tweet by actual evolutionary psychologist Diana Fleischmann. She turns him into a laughing stock.It no matter, Rollout Myassy got all butthurt and it has over 400 likes and 60 retweets, which is quite a lot for her page LMAO. He tried to do a "I see that Caypibaras are your spirit animal" or some retarded comeback like that, making him look even more stupid. xDDDDD | /r/ExRedPill | 09/11/17 05:46 PM |
| 11 | Rollout Myassy mumbles something idiotic in response to "cuck joke" tweet by actual evolutionary psychologist Diana Fleischmann. She turns him into a laughing stock.To add some context: Diana Fleischmann tweeted some pictures of capybaras raising birds, monkeys, turtles as if they were their own if the following quote: "Capybaras take care of one another’s young in the wild (alloparenting)- see how they happily take care of other animals. What total cucks." (sarcasm, obviously) Rollout Myassy get's all offended that an evolutionary psychologist is making fun of the "cuck" hysteria and tweets something stupid saying that those who raise the progeny of others… | /r/ExRedPill | 09/11/17 11:07 AM |
| 10 | Meta: I've never been a redpiller but is this the appropriate sub to make fun of them? If not, can you point me to the appropriate sub?/r/thebluepill /r/theinfraredpill | /r/ExRedPill | 19/08/17 10:53 PM |
| 3 | How to deal with an insecurity?Height is just a factor out of many. I highly doubt someone is going to reject you exclusively because of your height (specially taking into account that you're average) and even if they did, you wouldn't want to be with someone THAT picky and shallow. Let me say that other things in my life improved in those years; I workout and I'm in decent shape, I read a lot, I'm social, I travel a lot, I finished college,got in gradschool finishing my thesis and about to apply for a phd, I'm an active musi… | /r/ExRedPill | 04/08/17 04:57 PM |
| 0 | Q4ALL: What supposed "romantic" gesture do you find off-putting and weird?Refute my arguments, not my name. I could be trolling all you want, but if the argument makes logical sense then it's irrelevant if it's trolling. Basic logic. Something the male brain may not understand, specially when it isn't convenient. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/17 04:00 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: What supposed "romantic" gesture do you find off-putting and weird?If a woman believes in AMALT and male hamstering is "trolling" and "LEL". If a man believes in AWALT and female hamstering is all of a sudden a "dark truth". I'm not trolling, ignore my name, i believe everything i post. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/17 02:48 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveThe current basic understanding of our zeitgeist is that the male is a manipulative, overly-emotional and hypersexual being that can not be trusted. It's common sense and it's the truth. This whole "gender reversals" of the red pill about women being the ones who are shitty is very funny and it's nothing but another male's mind fart about projecting his own fault on women to avoid blame and guilt. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/17 12:58 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selective**1. generalizing all men in an insulting manner making women the victims of the situation, "they're innocent and easily manipulable!"** All of a sudden trp/incel gamma males become offended when all they do is generalize about women (and in totally outrageous fake ways). How easy it is to spot your misandry. Reality is misandrous. Blue Pill is the truth. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/08/17 12:55 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selective^ Clueless | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 08:57 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveThe Blue Pill is the deeper understanding that men are not chivalarous, kind and everything nice, that they in fact have a strong need to sexually conquer and dominante, that they are fundamentally emotional and childlike, that their concept of truth is not the same as that of women, and that their core nature is not to be loyal, but rather follow a dualistic mating strategy of "faking monogamy" with the best looking woman they can get while simultaneously cucking her with lower value ones. the … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 08:54 PM |
| 2 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveBecause millions of men don't know the degenerancy going on Thailand but almost every man has a story of spending money with women in dates or buying clothes and cars to impress them and intimidate rivals, and those males who can have history of travelling to foreign contries to "study abroad" (sexual tourism) or going miles away from home to chase a girl they met on tinder. It's the truth. Blue pill is the truth. Accept it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 08:47 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveIt takes tremendous intellectual dishonesty to believe that the male won't spend large sums of money and travel many miles to achieve the male imperative of recreationally impregnate as many females as possible. The kind of intellectual dishonesty that only males have. I have met many male hamsters who never had any interest in Thailand their whole lifes but want to go there once they learn about the sexual degenrancy going there. Then thailand all of a sudden becomes a "beautiful touristic spot… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 08:36 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveOf course it is sexual freedom! First let's not act like the male won't gladly spend his money on pursuing casual sex opportunities. Literally the only reason men ever try to make money is to frame themselves as good providers only to manipulate women into casual sex. A male will gladly spend money or go 3000 miles arround the world to any location that offers him sexual opportunities and will even say "thank you" like a nice boy. So there's that. Secondly, as long as there are slutty women offe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 05:08 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Sexual freedom already exists for men, and it doesn't make them more selectiveOf course males have sexual freedom. Even in the west. Males did not have sexual freedom before the 70s, when marriage was mandatory to have sex and a very large chunks of males would have only one partner in their lifes. Now the male is allowed to pursue degenrancy like "serious monogamy" and casual sex partners, and that's why males are falling behind women in the workforce and academia: They no longer have to nail a job or education to have access to female fertility, as pussy is the only dri… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 04:47 PM |
| 5 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?Obviously. It wasn't enough that you had to show your obvious male hamstering, now you display the infamous male solipsism. "You are wrong and i'm right", as in "only my views matter" or "it goes with my experience, i don't care about anything else". And with it, the inherent male narcisism of "only I own the truth". Pffffff... the male mind is so predictable and so laughable. At this point, anyone who rejects the blue pill truths is essentially kidding herself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 04:23 PM |
| 3 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?The spinning is amusing. Keep spinning. First the gamma males movement called TRP tries to convince everybody that women are hypergamous and only date like top 20% males. But then will somehow, someway still have sex with mid range guys. All of a sudden, the goal posts are moved so that hypergamy is not about a minority of males having all the sex while others are in constant drought, it's just that a minority of males are the ones who are truly sexually attractive while others are not sexually … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 04:17 PM |
| 5 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?First you say that women are hypergamous but then they can get some "middling to lower value guy". Under your own logic that doesn't make sense because lower to middle value guys are not real options to women. But logic is not something the emotional male brain is wired to understand. Stop spinning, please. By "staying with her" i mean not getting cucked by the male. A male may "love" a primary partner to have access to regular pussy but he'll still flirt and chase other women, particulary lower… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 03:48 PM |
| 4 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?Maybe in your gamma male reality. Women obviously get cucked, males are emotional creatures who will cheat with the next lower value woman who displays sexual accessbility. Women can not convince any male to stay with her. The male is hardwired to only stay with the woman in so far as she's gives him sexual accessbility and while he doesn't get sick of her. This is why many males will lose interest in a woman once he has sex with her and he burst his nut: Because males only value women for the s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 02:42 PM |
| 5 | If women are hypergamous only going for the best. Are men not also hypergamous?If the male doesn't "date up" it's by his choice. The male is hardwired to be hypogamous by nature, that is, he's gonna chase every female to fulfill his hardwired instinct of spreading his seed far and wide. By keeping his standards "relaxed" he's ensuring a much wider pool of availabe "cum dumpsters" (because, make no mistake, women are nothing but cum dumpsters to the male) to spread his seed. Men don't care about "dating up" because the male is not wired for monogamy and the only time where … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/17 02:24 PM |
| 4 | The Collapse of DatingWe need to bring back the institution of marriage to police the otherwise uncontrolable sexual nature of men. Males should not vote as they are by nature highly emotional and impulsive, as opposed to ponderate and self-regulative. Who starts bars fights over minor offesnes? Men. Who has frequent rage outburst? Males. Who is the risk taking sex that drinkas excessively, die in car crashes, etc? Males. This is why societies who allow polygyny and strict monogamy have higher crime rates overall: Be… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 07:10 PM |
| 3 | The Collapse of DatingI am 100% pro marriage. I don't know how that would hurt my argument. That hurts your argument because as a male you have an instinctual aversion to monogamy. But not mine. Up until the 50s males had to nail a job and a education to qualify as a good husband. Only then they would have the rightfully access to the much desired male prize: vagina. Society has always known the costs of the male hypogamy: when males are given sexual freedom they do nothing but compete in the dominance hierarchy with… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 06:59 PM |
| 2 | The Collapse of DatingSo we are coming upon the conclusion that we can manufacture red pill ideas and blue pill ideas based on the same kind of arguments? Wow, it is almost as if all it took was some evolutionary psychology pop science studies, a obnoxious revolutionary tone and a coherent narrative to convince a bunch of fools on the internet that men/women are this super weird and immoral gender that is out there to exploit them with hypogamy or hypergamy ;) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 03:48 PM |
| 5 | The Collapse of DatingIt is true. Many evolutionary psychology studies have been showing that the male has much lower standards than women, particulary for casual sex. The more hypogamous the male is, the more possible opportunities he has to have sex. Male can not afford to be picky nor they have desire to. The only thing men are picky about are good looks, but even then he'll cuck his woman with lower value women (hypogamy) because he's wired to spread his seed. Blue pill is the truth. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 02:55 PM |
| 5 | The Collapse of DatingWomen are hardwired for monogamy, the only reason women jump into something similar to casual sex is with the intention of starting a relationship. Even when the guy is hot there's a slight hope in it happening. It is the manipulative male imperative that approaches women with promises of love only to pump and dump them later. Typical male. Some women understand the truths of the blue pill and they act in slutty ways only to attract men but withold sex until he hamsters his mind into believing h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?Red Pill tone is much worse | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 02:48 PM |
| 2 | The Collapse of Dating14% is not far from the 10% i mentioned and 20% still means a 80% of males having a somewhat moderate amount of sex, whatever moderate means given that the overwhelming majority of people won't go past 15 partners in their lifetime. Again, the whole "sexless male" is projection from gamma males (incels, trp) onto beta males (average joe). | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 03:52 AM |
| 0 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?"everybody that reveals truths i am not read to deal with is a troll" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 01:07 AM |
| 5 | The Collapse of DatingGuys who end up on Incels, TRP and MGTOW are the 10 or so % of men who have rare to no sexual opportunities. I'm not gonna say that the average male has a wide array of pussy at is disposition either, but the whole "sexless male" is TRP projection. Besides, by sexual freedom i mean in comparison to the 50s. In the 50s it wouldn't be a uncommon for a male to have a single woman in his whole life. Nowadays any man who has at least 2 women is technically much more free sexually than a male in the 5… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/17 12:13 AM |
| 2 | The Collapse of DatingMales evolved for 99% of human history in small bands of hunter-gatherers of a few dozen people. In this envrionment a male could monopolize females or at least come close to it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:47 PM |
| 4 | The Collapse of DatingNot correct. All males fear cuckholding. It is not enough for a male to have endless sexual opportunities. Other males must fail too. That's the male nature, like it or not. It's in his genes to be extremely competitive with other males and monopolize females. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:43 PM |
| 3 | The Collapse of DatingRead the links and you'll see that these are careful elaborated scientific explanations that complement my rationale. Do you believe that i would do all that research just to troll? Rather your comment is another perfect example of male irrationality. I belieive that it is dreadful when a male is finally confronted with the hard truth, that's why you're being defensive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:38 PM |
| 6 | The Collapse of DatingNo, but i will gladly cuck any man who doesn't fulfill his invested husband duties. The only thing that keeps men from cheating and fulfilling his hardwired male imperative of spreading his seed far and wide is the dreaded fear of being cuckholded himself. The male psyche is hardwired to want to monopolize all the females while other rival males get none. So there's nothing more humiliating and dreadful to a male but to have a rival male have sex at his expense. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:36 PM |
| 3 | The Collapse of DatingMen would not get "cucked" if there was no male sexual freedom in the first place. Besides, i have a hard time believing that these "cucked males" were good husbands in the first place. With women, number 1 reason for cheating is relationship dissatisfaction while men report doing it out of promiscuity. And women often report falling in love with the man they cheated on his primary partner with. This is what studies been showing and it is perfectly aligned with my personal experience as a woman. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:25 PM |
| 4 | The Collapse of DatingI'm simply presenting my interpretation of the same phenomenons as red pill does. You think i would go as far as posting links if this was random trolling? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:14 PM |
| 6 | The Collapse of DatingDespite my name i fully believe in every bit of information i post. People say i'm trolling, but when TRP does similar arguments against women is not trolling because...? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:04 PM |
| 3 | The Collapse of DatingOnly the third paragraph because of the links. Copying a parapgraph only one time out of convenience is not spamming. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 09:00 PM |
| 5 | The Collapse of DatingRefute my arguments, not my name. Quit ad hominems, please. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:58 PM |
| 4 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?And frankly, this sounds just as crazy as the worst of red pill. you really think this is a reasonable argument? So red pill sounds crazy yet people here take it seriously and are open to debate with TRP. Why is it that people are quick to see the crazyness of the shitstorm that is red pill but when the tables turn people like me are censored? ;) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:48 PM |
| 13 | The Collapse of DatingThere's only one reason for the decline of dating and that is simply male sexual freedom. The male imperative is to spread it's seed far and wide, evolutionary speaking. He may "love" a women who signals good genetic markers (good looking) but his imperative is to keep cucking her with lower value sluts, or at least try. Society has always realized the importance of controlling male sexuality and that's why up until the 50s sex was unacceptable outside the marriage union. If a male wanted to hav… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 3 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?I generally refrain myself from interaction with males. Males are worthy exclusively for cuddling and dumping. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:15 PM |
| 5 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?I don't know if males have a hard time seducing women or not. All i know is that all of them are wired to pursue multiple sexual flings in the most obnoxious disloyal way possible. Most ideas on red pill are false and are a projection of the male psyche. For example, the idea that "Chad" exists is a projection of the masculine fear of having a rival male monopolizing all women while other get none. The whole idea of female solipsism, narcisism and other delusions are males projecting their own d… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:12 PM |
| 2 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?It is irrelevant if most males are violent criminals or not. The gender difference is still a manifestation of the male evolutionary imperative to compete. Other males don't commit violent crimes but they will still compete in the dominance hierarchy. Wether they do risk taking activities like speeding off in their cars or drinking excessvely, start bar fights over minore offenses or try to "Out-afla" other males with jokes in a social group situation: All males compete to get female attention a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:07 PM |
| 1 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?I do not know who that is. Seems to be a male scholar based on my google search, but i generally never take ideas from the male brain, with few notable exception. Dominance hierarchy is a simple ethology term... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 08:04 PM |
| 3 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?It doesn't matter if raise awareness regarding the truths of the blue pill, however, sister. The male solipsistic mind is not prepared to accept criticism. The male always reject any responsibility or blame or anything outside his reality. In fact, males tend to be so narcisistic they are never wrong in their own eyes. The blue pill is indeed a bitter pill to swallow. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 07:22 PM |
| 3 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?It is not too simplistic. Societies where men are allowed to take multiple wifes or have multiple partners are indeed less peaceful and much more prone to all sorts of crime. Even in today's west 80% of violent crime victims are male and violent criminals are overwhelmingly male too. This is because the male is hardwired to compete with other males to monopolize women. In societies where women outnumber men, not only men behave in more promiscuous ways due to high surplus of available partners b… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 07:08 PM |
| 1 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?It IS something that needs fixing from whichever position in the dominance hierarchy the male is in. The male imperative is to spread his seed far and wide by impregnating multiple women and compete with other males in the dominance hierarchy to achieve this evolutionary quest. When men are free to pursue their animalistic sexual instincts all they do is fight and compete for women and employ no parental invesment in their women and offspring. Men are emotional creatures ready to fuck, fight or … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:47 PM |
| 8 | Why doesn't society just tell boys/men what girls/women want?Exactly. Society needs men to be well behaved and keep their hypogamous instincts in check. Because a man is hardwired to only care about literally nothing but pussy he'll do nothing but to chase pussy and compete with other men in the dominance hierarchy. Society becomes unstable when men have freedom because the male imperative will result in violence and competition over women. Unfortunelly, the west is already collapsing because every since the 70s that men have sexual freedom and they do no… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 03:39 PM |
| 1 | The same logical fallacies and ignorance of evidence keep coming upI agree, there is false equivalence within the discussion of dating advise... Because it is women who have a much harder time with dating. Unaware men will imply that women have a easier time with dating because they can have sex easier in comparison to the average men. But this is false equivalency because the feminine objective is monogamy. Whenever women jump into anything similar to casual sex it's with the intention of starting a relationship. Even if the guy is hot we harbor the hope of st… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:56 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnMidlle East is a battlefield not due to sexual frustration but due to polygyny. Societies that allow polygyny or otherwise male sexual freedom collapse because males start competing over sexual access to as many women as possible. All the fighting whitin middle east has no purpose other than to show off to women to acquire as many wifes as possible and to kill off the competition. This is due to the male imperative. Men are hardwired to monopolize as many females as possible and compete with oth… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:33 PM |
| 1 | We should be making steps to move away from the patriarchy, there is no returnMales are hardwired to spread their seed as far and wide as they can, it's the male imperative. They are programed by millions of years of evolution to chase as much casual sex as they can and to even cuck their woman with sexually accessible women. The patriarchy emerged as a way to control the male imperative: When males have sexual freedom all they do is compete with other males for monopolization of female fertility and spread their seed as much as humanly possible. Patriarchy fights the mal… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/07/17 01:25 PM |
| 3 | A "cheaper to keeper" good friend on mine sent me this with great envyWhat's the difference between this and "degenerate fat feminist" with constant facebook status updates saying "Single? Yes. Alone? Never" or "I don't need no man"? But then again, this isn't exactly the kind of sub i'd expect to see any coherency. If anything, those kind of update status only show how hard the fat feminist is tring to convince herself of how happy she is, when she's not. Just like this post. | /r/MGTOW | 28/07/17 02:17 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter