TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Trunk-Monkey Archive

View 3 posts and 401 comments by Trunk-Monkey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

There are, literally, thousands of religions... and this guy is familiar enough with all of them to label all of religion as gynocentric. In other words, you can't expect anyone to take you seriously when you make such sweeping generalizations.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 10:10 AM
1

Not a chance. There are times when a protective order is needed. The interim order serves to protect the victim until the hearing for a full order can be held. Last year my family had to get a protective order against a local woman who was threatening our children's lives. The interim order meant that right away we could involve the police if she was near our home, but more importantly, that our children's school could involve the police if she showed up there.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 02:37 PM
7

You are right. I've just gotten a bit apathetic about such things since people still quote/believe that farce of a "study" by Mary Koss from back in 1987. Decades of logic and reason, and it hasn't been enough to counter Koss's lies. It feels like an inevitable repeating pattern at this point: The Feminists spin a false narrative. The general public believes it. And if we challenge, or oppose it, we are at best, dismissed as misogynists or rape apologists.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 05:38 AM
26

It's harmful to who? Men? Isn't that the intent?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:27 PM
62

Incel is used exclusively for men because it's intended to be derogatory.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:25 PM
1

And I wholly agree. It's also a pet peeve when women claim that men had the right to vote soo much earlier than they did. I'm like, no. Men still don't have the right to vote. We're only granted the privilege of voting in exchange for registering to be conscripted into the military.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 12:36 AM
1

I didn't make the point, You made the point: “Privileges” for AMAB people including men and trans women, but just normal rights for cis women, right? So you tell us, what's the point?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 04:25 AM
1

Yeah... doesn't exactly sit well, does it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 03:05 AM
0

the people creating it ARE eligible to be drafted and therefore CAN be subject to said draft. Again, no. Conscription would require Congress to grant the President authority to induct individuals, and the President would have to sign implementing legislation. The average age our current Congress is 61.5yrs, and Trump is 79yrs. The cut-off for military service is 45yrs. They ARE NOT eligible to be drafted and therefore CANNOT be subject to said draft.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 12:18 AM
-2

Newsflash. It's not being reinstated... That happened 46 years ago in 1980. Meaning that the people involved? Way too old to be drafted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 06:39 AM
-6

What the wealthy would, or would not do, has no bearing on the fact that you can never have what you stated you would like to see: the people making the draft be the first ones to BE drafted, on account of those people not being alive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 05:22 AM
-6

Did you miss that it was established in 1917? 109 years ago... The people responsible for Selective Service aren't going to be doing anything... they're long dead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 04:42 AM
17

Given that Selective Service was established in 1917, I don't think you're going to see any of those people drafted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 04:11 AM
-11

If you want a chance of anyone of any importance taking you at all seriously, you need to stoop calling it the "draft". Call it what it is: Selective Service Even so, you're never going to see Selective Service abolished, and it's also almost certain that Selective Service will never be 'gender neutral'. In the unlikely event that women were included, they would almost certainly be assigned non-combat roles. Women aren't going to fight to be sent into combat, and far too many men would support t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 04:09 AM
2

most men feel threatened and act like babies when when women do anything better than them especially within the confines of a relationship. No, no they don't. Wherever it is that you think you're seeing this, isn't representative of most men. Most of use just don't really care in general, and will be proud/supportive of our partners success in a relationship. We DO sometimes get annoyed when a woman doing something is blown up as some sort of historic achievement and it's rubbed in our face as "…
/r/MensRights10/04/26 01:13 AM
3

Again with false narratives. I don't recall any comments about forcing anyone to stay in a relationship. You'll note that this is because no such comments were made. Women needing to "step up" in this context, is about them making good decisions and taking responsibility for their decisions, not about anyone being forced to do anything.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 03:02 AM
5

This is entirely wrong. First, you falsely equate maintaining the family structure with necessarily "high conflict". Yes, low conflict is better but... Second, studies show explicitly that households with both the mother and father predict significantly better outcomes for kids.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 01:00 AM
8

It's simple. When someone chooses to break up the family, that person is responsible for the consequences. Including the lack of both parents in the home, and the problems that arise from single parenting. What they should do, if the well being of the children is truly a priority, is maintain the family structure. Study after study have shown that children do substantially better when they have both their mother and father in the home.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 02:34 PM
20

That's a big fat nope. Men are not responsible for "stepping up" when the separation/divorce is initiated by the woman and she takes primary, or total, custody. Women can't expect men to be role models for children after they break up the family, especially when they limit or deny the mans access to his own children.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 12:19 PM
76

Better idea... How about women "step up" by actually staying with the baby's father so that their kids have a male role model in the house! It's a far sight better than expecting the rest of us men to fix their failings.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 11:16 PM
2

depsite this I'm still a feminist. It's plain wrong to be sexist at all. As if modern feminism isn't misandristic.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 03:31 AM
6

I also completely agree with the idea that they ask the mother if she and the baby are safe. That's not an indictment of you, but rather the statistics around domestic violence, particularly just after babies are born. I really wish people would stop with this so called "statistic". Half of it is just false narrative. The actual statistics show that the greater risk to newborns is from the mother. Mothers commit the majority of parental homicides of children under 1 year at 71.7%, and the overwh…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 06:16 AM
36

Sad to say, but you get used to it... It's not just healthcare. It happens with daycare, and the education system. It happens at retail stores that specialize in infant/child supplies or clothing. It even happens at public parks and playgrounds. There are a few heroes out there though. When my twins were born premature, they spent about two weeks in the NICU. I was in the NICU, sitting and holding my babies one time, when a new mother got upset that I was there. She was yelling at me to leave be…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 03:44 AM
1

You, literally, don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:22 PM
1

How is that at all relevant? You can, sometimes, sign away some rights, you cannot, however, sign away legal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 04:09 AM
8

Going to need a better answer than that... Men shouldn't be forced to financially support the result of a pregnancy that they don't want. And shouldn't be forced into the presumption of paternity for the result of pregnancies they neither wanted, nor caused...
/r/MensRights08/06/22 01:31 PM
4

"women's days"? Are you joking? As it stands, every day is women's day. This is just an attempt at having women's issues invade a space that is intended for men's issues. Nevermind the lack of comparable "men's days"...
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:29 PM
0

I doubt that. First, you keep going on about Benadryl... but Benadryl was only mentioned briefly in the deposition, mostly Cosby talks about acquiring and dispensing Quaaludes. And second, because none of the testimony in his deposition stated that he engaged in non-consensual sex or gave anyone Quaaludes without their knowledge or consent. What Cosby "confessed" to, was casual sex involving recreational use of Quaaludes with a series of young women.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 05:13 AM
4

You haven't actually read his deposition, have you? Don't bother answering. I've read it, so i know that if you had actually read it, you would know that he did not confess as you claimed.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 12:18 AM
1

Clearly she's not a believer in the whole "my body, my choice" thing.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:20 AM
3

Best bet? More like no bet at all! The reality is, even if you ended Selective Service, it would be reactivated if ever then need arises. And it'll still only be men that are impacted, unless it is first expanded to be gender neutral.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 08:35 PM
2

I was going to vote... but there's no option for "False Dichotomy"
/r/MensRights05/06/21 11:46 PM
2

I don't get what's to be happy about here, this isn't a month celebrating or recognizing or appreciating men. It's "In recognition of the importance of having men as partners in promoting gender equality and equity..." This looks like little more than woke feminism giving a nod to male allies, but only for being allies.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 11:48 PM
2

but this is, apparently, only about appreciating men "as partners in promoting gender equality and equity"... which doesn't sound like any sort of appreciation of men at all, just an appreciation of women's allies that might also happen to be men.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 11:44 PM
2

You're not wrong. But the problems with that position are that A. they almost always came about only after the discussion about opening up the draft to include women, which makes it nothing more than self-serving. and B. that the draft, and selective service, even if discontinued, will inevitably be reinstated if ever there is a need. When that happens, the draft needs to already be gender neutral.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 08:03 PM
5

I was just coming to that realization after googling "Dr Red Ruby Scarlet"... although, I'm still having a hard time fathoming why anyone would take this person seriously. I mean, nearly everyone loves a bowl of nuts, but you don't let the nuts advise you on social policy.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 07:14 PM
5

Dr Red Ruby Scarlet ???? This is satire... right? It's just got to be. please tell me it's satire. What kind of moron thinks that "father's day" is problematic but doesn't bat an eye at "mother's day"?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 06:31 PM
4

Got something similar from Etsy... And all the rationalizing is BS. All the same arguments for offering an opt-out can be applied to Mother's day, and yet, there was no offer to opt-out of that.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 06:27 PM
5

It's fraud, perjury, interference with law enforcements, obstruction of justice... Just making a false report to law enforcement is a misdemeanor, if the report results in injury or death of the accused, it's a felony. It's a crime, and should be treated as such. The only reason this is even a question is the prevailing narrative of women sex crime accusers as de facto 'victims'. But they are only victims if the alleged crime actually occurred, otherwise, the accuser is actually the criminal. No…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 08:37 AM
1

If you're using Outlook as your email client, you can set up rules that will automatically move emails to a "junk" folder based on key words in the subject, sender, recipient. works wonders for filtering out "work" emails that you don't actually need/want.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:39 PM
18

Sex - since it comes with the obligation to financially support any child that results. Even if the man was a victim of rape, was "sperm jacked", or was lied to about the woman's use of birth control. Divorce - Since men are disproportionally ordered to financially support their ex Higher Education - Since there are fewer scholarships available to men Dating - The expectation that men pay for everything I'm sure I can think of more once I've had my coffee and am actually awake.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:39 PM
1

What does this even mean? It means that your "legal sex" does not necessarily align with your "genetic sex" Already covered that. Penis observed: XY, male. Vagina observed: XX, female This is not entirely correct. There are a number of conditions that can result in either ambiguous or atypical genitalia. For instance: Hermaphroditism Gonadal dysgenesis Pure gonadal dysgenesis Pseudohermaphroditism Androgen insensitivity syndrome 5-alpha-reductase deficiency Congenital adrenal hyperplasia Both ge…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 10:32 PM
1

Genetically, sex is determined by chromosomes. Legally, sex is assigned at birth. It works something like this... Genetically a child is either male or female, but at birth, the attending doctor looks at the baby and says something like 'oh look. genitals' and based on the outward appearance of those genitals makes a, sometimes inaccurate, determination of sex, which is then recorded on the birth documents and is thus... legally assigned. I'm sorry if that distinction is too complex to understan…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:48 PM
-1

Go ahead and look it up. Legally, sex is assigned at birth... it even gets recorded on the birth certificate...
/r/MensRights15/04/21 06:00 AM
-1

On the genetic level they are still either male or female, as determined by the presence or absence of the Y chromosome. And I'm pretty sure that both genetically male, and genetically female people have rights. Legally sex is assigned at birth as either male or female, and may be be changed if an individual gets a court order to do so. And I'm pretty sure that both legally male and legally female people have rights. So, right off, the people you mention, "Intersex, non-binary, etc.", already ha…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 04:41 AM
1

Upvoted for the lolz!
/r/MensRights15/04/21 12:14 AM
2

You are correct, there are sex robots of both sexes, but I don't think it's significant to the apparent hypocrisy of opposing full body robots as 'objectifying' while celebrating robotic penises as 'liberating'. Additionally, those that get outraged about (female) sex robots are the ones creating negative, fear inducing, media content about them... and they're not mentioning the male sex robots. The result is that the message that the average person gets is 'sex robots are for men', which create…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:39 PM
2

In one corner we have a "sex robot" - a robotic female body. In the other corner we have a vibrator - a robotic male sex organ. Beyond all reason, the full body robot is more 'objectifying' than the 'we only care about the penis' robotic cock... The only explanation that makes any sense is that this is a product of both the belief that the only value women have in a heterosexual relationship is as a penis stimulator and ejaculation receptacle, and fear... fear that they may become replaceable as…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:32 PM
23

Was going to say basically the same thing. Glad she was sentenced, and that it's not just a 'slap on the wrist', but given that her victim was younger than his... I mean, there may be some significant detail left out that would justify a longer sentence for Dexter, but absent that, it certainly seems pretty f'ed up that his sentence is longer than hers.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:57 AM
7

What the what? We should prejudge both the intent and outcome of a study based on nothing more than the inclusion of male participants? …I don't think so, and as an anecdotal, example, I'm pretty damn sure that the NIH study my sons and I are participating in is looking at hereditary components, and developmental impact, of sex chromosome abnormalities, explicitly XYY syndrome, and is, in no way, trying to “deconstruct” masculinity. In fact, the study will, ultimately, benefit men and boys.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 03:33 PM
1

I think the whole pro-life/pro-choice thing is a false dichotomy. Personally I don't approve of abortions except in medically necessary cases, or incidences of rape. but I also don't believe that the government should limit reproductive choice by making abortion illegal, because I acknowledge that not everyone shares my view. So... pro-life on a personal level, and pro-choice on a political level.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 03:20 PM
1

Baroness Jenny Jones, member of the Green Party, and certainly not a 'teenager radical feminists': “I argue that, at the next opportunity for any Bill that is appropriate, I might put in an amendment to create a curfew for men on the streets after 6pm."
/r/MensRights15/03/21 08:23 PM
1

I didn't initially make it past the title: "Do feminists even do a research... further reading was disrupted by the lolz. Of course they don't. They may do pseudo 'research' and fudge the findings, but, as we've all heard, logic is patriarchal, and facts are 'male coded', so it's ideologically imperative that they avoid using either logic or facts… consequently, any real research is simply not an option.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 07:17 PM
9

Even if anyone here was simple minded enough to accept such a pedestrian framing of feminism, they still might notice something about your words: Real feminism is still fighting for women in lesser developed countries AND are also helping gain attention to issues in relation to; religion, race, the LGBTQ etc. ... notably, the complete lack of any mention of men or men's issues. If your efforts for 'equality' exclude half the population, then it isn't for equality. Dismissing men to the point of …
/r/MensRights08/03/21 04:44 PM
4

one of the few ways that men actually have the short end of the stick... One of the "few"? yeah, No thanks, I smell a gaslighting on the way... No need to read any further.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 02:45 AM
1

The woman had accepted the footage showed Mr Fox’s hand on the table the entire time it took for the photo to be taken. Despite this she still maintained he had sexually assaulted her. Still maintaining her story after it was disproven... I don't know how it works in Ireland, but I certainly hope he can go after the woman in civil court.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 10:40 PM
2

(only really replying to maintain the dolt train) Since we have no way to definitively ascertain what he meant, we can only take the more pedantic approach of evaluating what he actually said. You dolt.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 11:22 PM
2

Context or not, it's a factually incorrect statement. If you have to make assumptions, and modify the statement for it to be true... then it isn't true. And I'm all for, and amused by, keeping the "you dolt" train going, you dolt.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 08:45 PM
2

The title of the study is completely irrelevant to the falsity of the claim that "You can be a man and have a baby", you dolt.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 08:23 PM
7

Then he doesn't mean men, you dolt.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 07:46 PM
14

‘You can be a man and have a baby’ Uhm... no. Somebody might be a bit confused about the differences between men and women. Men have a Y chromosome, and having a Y chromosome precludes having ovaries, or a uterus, and by extension, menstruation, the ability to become pregnant.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 07:11 PM
7

Taking a gender neutral word... explaining interrupting spreading making it gendered, and using it to disparage one sex... mansplaining manterrupting manspreading despite the behavior being common with both sexes... Surely you don't really need anyone to explain that to you... right?
/r/MensRights15/02/21 09:35 AM
5

I'll talk about believing in it when people use an appropriate, gender neutral, not insulting name for it... like... I don't know... "gender role strain'
/r/MensRights05/01/21 10:24 PM
2

2014 ≠ New
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:27 PM
14

Advice for her? She should ignore her brother's opinion on this one. She's free to make her own choices, and possibly mistakes. And, whether or not this guy is the right one for her... well, that's her decision. I do get what you're saying. I have avoided single mothers like the plague. And I assume that a fair percentage of other men might do the same. Their status as a single parent likely indicates questionable life/relationship/sex choices, and the child itself presents a potential financial…
/r/MensRights25/10/20 10:24 PM
8

How does what work? and what's not to be sure of. You're either for, or against genital mutilation. Most people agree that genital mutilation of girls is immoral, it's also illegal in much of the world. Apply all the same logic about the wrongs of mutilating girl's genitals, and apply it to boy's. voila!
/r/MensRights24/10/20 04:27 AM
18

Do you think we should mutilate girls, genital when they're born? No? Why should boy's be any different?
/r/MensRights24/10/20 04:17 AM
122

November 17th 1998. Hillary Clinton gave a speech at a conference on domestic violence at which she stated: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children." Boggles the mind, doesn't i…
/r/MensRights24/10/20 04:13 AM
431

If the voters that they're trying to sway don't care about men's lives, then the questions wont acknowledge men dying. expanding on the quote from H. Clinton... Women have always been the primary victim of anything that kills men.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 12:36 AM
17

Didn't you get the memo? Not all fathers have enough intersectionality points to actually matter.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 12:31 AM
2

I'm pretty damn certain that the first time I had sex did not make me a man, it made me a teenager with a stupid grin on my face... but not a man. Our maleness is innate. We're born with it, being a 'man' just comes from surviving through puberty.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:53 AM
14

I really hate the whole concept of "Real Men" Our maleness is innate. We're born with it, and have no need to conform to anyone's standards for it to be "real".
/r/MensRights19/10/20 06:33 PM
9

Can you show me where anything was cherrypicked, or where I made any claim regarding a lack of support for a movement? I'll save you the trouble... you can't
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:11 PM
8

Convenient swapping of terms there. Feminism not caring about men would pair up with the MRM not caring about women. Not with whether or not men care about feminism. Men couldn’t care about feminism before it was 'created' so that's a massive red herring. Never mind that without men caring, there would never have been any political support for women's suffrage in the first place. So, the entire claim is demonstrably false.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:07 PM
12

u/PurplePlatypusBear20 Can you point me to the feminists who say that Because I haven’t heard that once I see your DM, but I'm not inclined to move this conversation, if you want to continue it, it'll be here. Especially if you're going to feign ignorance and not participate in good faith. If you haven't noticed that feminism makes the claim, then perhaps a few searches will get you started… https://duckduckgo.com/?q=feminism+helps+men&atb=v198-1&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?q=faminism+fights+…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 06:30 PM
1

Not just polite, it's necessary for the question to have any merit at all. Consider all of the topics that get brought up under the label 'women's rights'. It's a broad umbrella, often inappropriately encompassing issues that have nothing to do with 'rights', and how an individual feels about them is going to be dependent on the specific issue(s).
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:36 PM
18

Feminists do not do double duty as men’s rights activists. Yeah, we already know... Please tell that to the feminists that keep insisting that we don't need a Men's Rights movement because they're addressing our issues.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:19 PM
1

What the absolute fuck? We all know that the wrongness of #killallmen isn't dependent on the motivation that someone claims when using the hashtag, and we're prone to disbelieving the claims of a humorous, sarcastic, or otherwise innocuous motivation anyway. So how would what you're proposing be any different? The only thing you would actually accomplish, is the reinforcement of the idea that there is a rape culture, and that men are misogynists. Nothing good would come out of this.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:14 PM
2

Why don't you show me, exactly, where that happened. Also, you might want to refresh your understanding of the definition of "literally"
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:48 AM
5

Okay then, since you're playing games, I guess I'll just chalk this up to a bad faith question.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 04:25 AM
3

What women's rights issues, in particular? or are we supposed to guess?
/r/MensRights17/10/20 02:56 AM
4

Paul Elam may be the 'leader' of AVfM, but I'm not sure that translates out to being a 'leader' of the larger MRM. Also, despite agreeing with some of what he says, that man is an overly argumentative bloviating ass, he certainly doesn't represent me either as a man, or as an MRA. And he isn't the only person to either adopt, or be attributed, the label of MRA, that I will happily disavow.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 10:28 PM
2

The argument is predicated on a low prevalence of false accusation, which is, at best debatable, and a worst a fallacy. From https://www.aals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Bowen-Kanin-False-Rape-Empirical.pdf "Regarding this study, 41% (n = 45) of the total disposed rape cases (n = 109) were officially declared false during this 9-year period, that is, by the complainant's admission that no rape had occurred and the charge, therefore, was false."
/r/MensRights16/10/20 08:15 PM
7

And yes, that IS comparable and no. it's not comparable, it's worse. The girl is physically assaulting the boy, with the potential to cause very serious physical harm, including testicular rupture, testicular torsion, epididymitis. Unwanted touching, or groping, simply does not cause the same level of pain, nor carry the same risk of physical harm.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 11:56 PM
8

What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:27 AM
2

I suppose she thinks that these tools wouldn't have had a gender reveal party if the baby was a girl?!?! Or maybe she thinks that only blue pyrotechnics are dangerous and pink ones are totally safe...
/r/MensRights09/09/20 08:50 PM
9

Well, that all depends, doesn't it. In theory rights for women isn't a loss for men. But in practice? How about the following 'women's rights' victories? The tender years doctrine Demands of 50/50 employment in preferred roles (regardless of merit) The Duluth model VAWA Women's only businesses and services while men's only are shut down. Lower burden of proof for men accused of sexual crimes The 'Dear Colleagues' letter and Title IX courts on college campuses … I could go on
/r/MensRights26/08/20 02:48 PM
17

He deserved what every other accused individual deserves. A trial. in a court of law.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:45 AM
9

You might be entertained by this post about the Dutch version of the Survivor TV show... https://www.girlsaskguys.com/social-relationships/a34992-survivor-experiment-women-vs-men
/r/MensRights14/08/20 07:44 PM
15

When women hate men At least she acknowledges the misandry ... want to distance ourselves from men, have our own communities yeah, because segragation has worked out soo well in the past...
/r/MensRights14/08/20 07:09 PM
1

Thanks for providing the archive link... should have thought to do that myself.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 08:15 PM
0

Really? You all don't think that the expectation that men/boys risk themselves for women/girls is toxic?
/r/MensRights11/08/20 04:05 PM
-7

No, toxic masculinity is the expectation that the boys had some obligation to risk their lives to save the girl.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 09:00 PM
6

This can be summed up as: we don't support feminism, because feminism doesn't support us.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 06:55 AM
2

Kissing someone without their consent, especially someone you don't already have a somewhat affectionate relationship with ≠ making a pass.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 07:59 PM
16

Maybe, just maybe, it's more difficult to recognize someone, let alone evaluate someone's reactions, feelings, intent, etc. when they're wearing a mask… so, we all look a little longer to compensate. Meanwhile, some people find it so difficult that they mistake being looked at by someone with a mask, as aggressive/threatening…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 06:59 PM
5

Women have a pay gap I think you mean that women have the freedom to choose not to prioritize work over nearly everything else.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:39 PM
1

Waiting for this to be spun as evidence of sexism in selecting sources for citations/publication...
/r/MensRights08/07/20 06:44 PM
1

It takes away from men's rights because the pressure from events like this drive changes to policy... and it's how we end up with things like the Duluth model and the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act being replaced with the Violence Against Women Act.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:37 AM
2

I'm anti-false dichotomy
/r/MensRights03/06/20 12:14 AM
3

I do. In addition to the items one might normally carry, I also usually have a field recorder, a mini tripod for the recorder, spare batteries, spare SD cards, a usb thumb drive, a pair of glasses, wipes/spray for cleaning said glasses If I went out today I would likely add a few extra face masks, pairs of gloves, and hand sanitizer. I generally wear jeans and a button down shirt… and It's 85 °F outside… so no jacket. and no way all that shit fits into jeans pockets and a shirt pocket. Hell, ass…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:10 PM
0

All fit in pockets? you must be wearing cargo pants.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 07:22 PM
2

Calling B.S. on this... what goes in a man's purse? how about wallet, cell phone, car keys, multitool, cigs and lighter if you smoke, pen, business cards, any medication you might be using... that's a lot of practicality.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 07:15 PM
2

Yep, been carrying a purse since the mid 90's. Army surplus gas mask bags make great purses, used those for many years. Or smaller carrying cases from audio gear, photography equipment and the like. Really any reasonably sized canvas bag/satchel works.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 07:10 PM
2

Maxwell Q. Klinger
/r/MensRights04/04/20 05:56 AM
2

Look for yourself: https://www.un.org/en/sections/observances/international-days/#Nov
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:39 AM
59

They don't just "not recognize" it... according to the UN, November 19th is World Toilet Day.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 07:15 AM
16

She still wouldn't have lost because she's female, She lost despite being female, and because she didn't offer voters any real value.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:41 AM
2

Incels are not called incel for nothing tho. You're right, they're called incel because they are INvoluntarily CELibate They have specific "beliefs". Other than the belief that they are involuntarily celibate, no. they do not.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 03:32 AM
10

You don't see the issue because you're looking in the wrong place… No one cares how you've chose to live your life. No one hates you for expressing yourself, for feeling positive about your body, or for exploring your sexuality. The issue, the one that you don't see, is that we oppose your sense of entitlement, the idea that we owe you something and are obligated to "settle down" with you. Men don't owe you anything. Full stop. For comparison, you are probably less interested in settling down wi…
/r/MensRights08/12/19 11:00 PM
4

If you want the original version as signed in '94, it can be found here: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/103/hr3355/text
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:17 PM
21

If gay pride is a thing, then one should expect straight pride to be a thing, at least until everyone gets over it, and stops giving a crap about anyone else's sexuality. Until then, I'd like to say that Ocasio-Cortez lost my support, but truth is, she never had it.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 08:58 PM
8

Let them. I mean… their members likely agree with them, so they're rather having an echo chamber on that front. Meanwhile, everyone else can see that they're publicly declaring themselves against men's due process rights. Enough miss-steps like that, and just maybe the general public will begin to see them for what they are.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 06:24 AM
2

Personally, I'd rescue the dog and the cat, but the boy and girl? Nope, I've already experienced having a random woman call the police when she saw me with my own children at a park... think I'm going to risk the accusations for someone else's kids?
/r/MensRights23/07/19 05:21 AM
16

I don't know… but socialism rests on the functional redistribution of resources from those that earn/produce more to those that earn/produce less via "social ownership", and the distribution of a "social dividend" to all members of the public. How can that possibly be compatible with Men's rights given that, men are generally net producers, and women generally net consumers?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:35 AM
1

And yet... Feminine hygiene products have been around for about 1,100 years Humans have been around for about 315,000 years. They are a luxury, not a necessity, otherwise women wouldn't have managed just fine without them for over 300,000 years.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 04:27 PM
1

... Margaret Atwood writes fiction, which is to say, she makes a living by making shit up
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:03 AM
11

To quote the AutoModerator bot... emphasis mine Welcome to Reddit's most active feminist community! This is a women-centered, radical feminist subreddit to discuss gender from a critical, feminist perspective. unsuprisingly, the bottom of a latrine really is full of crap.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:29 PM
1

Well, then Queens can sit at home on their thrones while the rest of us are out having a good time.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:14 PM
5

If a person is discriminated against, they are discriminated against regardless of any classification applied to the person doing the discriminating. The sex disposition of the judge has no bearing on whether or not male defendants are disadvantaged in court when compared to female defendants.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:43 PM
3

All you have to do is ask yourself, would this be a good message? http://grumplebunny.com/Images/Memes/gillette-venus.jpg doesn't seem to be anti-women's rights, so why would anyone hate it?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:45 PM
4

they may suck... but they didn't sue sexual harassment victims... Proctor & Gamble was the respondent in that case, which was case number A 1802642 filed in Hamilton County Ohio on June 7th 2018 by Larry L. Huston as petitioner against Procter & Gamble.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:18 AM
9

Fortnite doesn't judge you for spending time with a girlfriend, or nag you to pay attention to it, or complaint that you didn't take it to dinner, or whine that you didn't buy it expensive gifts, or...
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:00 AM
30

To be fair, I once had a discussion with our local District Attorney in which he stated that we don't have a justice system... we have a legal system.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:49 PM
11

Part of me wants to just say "get used to it"... but that's the wrong answer. Don't get used to it, make a stink, oppose discrimination. I can't give any advice, since I'm not in Canada,
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:54 AM
7

"If you wish to be treated like a 'lady', then try acting like one."
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:35 AM
3

Isn't that nice, but, taking a page from Irina Dunn and Gloria Steinem… A man needs feminism like a fish needs a bicycle
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:28 PM
21

Well... if "stealthing" = rape. This is pretty much the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 02:43 AM
10

‘By his own admission in the complaint (the boy) desired and maintained the sexual relationship with Ms. McCarter in order to derive a personal benefit - initially to extend his stay at the McCarters’ residence and then to ensure his return therein. Well that certainly sounds like a stereotypical #MeToo moment right there. It was classic quid pro quo exploitation of the boy.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 03:40 AM
1

I don't know about other countries, but if you're in the U.S. then she (and the cops) can fuck right off... Members of the public have a very limited scope of privacy rights when they are in public places. Basically, anyone can be photographed without their consent except when they have secluded themselves in places where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy such as dressing rooms, rest-rooms, medical facilities, and inside their homes.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 03:30 AM
1

Buy a top of the line BlendTec blender. Put phone in blender. Turn blender on.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/18 08:48 PM
2

Red Dawn? Seriously? The "evidence" to support your position is a bad Patrick Swayze movie from 1984? Never mind that the movie doesn't support your position. In the film the characters resisted Soviet occupation with guerilla warfare, not terrorism. If you need a fresher on the difference, see here
/r/MensRights17/11/18 11:13 PM
1

Oh Yeah, I got that memo... I think I used it to line the cat's litterbox.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:02 AM
8

Does this mean I can park in the handicap spots now?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 12:32 AM
1

I hate to burst your bubble, but you're wrong. While there are laws that serve to protect a citizen from being sued if a rescue attempt ends up doing more harm to a person in need of help, none of those laws prohibit the person in need from later making accusations of criminal action, nor do they provide a shield against either criminal or civil liability if such an accusation is made.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:43 PM
1

Most of us would probably be thinking something more along the lines of, "oh, crap! But it's just not worth the risk" The "it's what women get…" attitude mostly happens when we're removed from the immediate situation. But the fact is, many of us have families to support, and children to raise. It's not just ourselves at risk, it's everyone that depends on us.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:19 PM
13

As long as there is an attitude that women are entitled to assistance from any man, and simultaneously attitudes that masculinity is toxic, and that all men are potential rapists… I'll be limiting my CPR Trained Toxic Masculinity to family members thank you very much. Also, note that sexual assault, and rape, are both acts of "willful misconduct", and as such, you would not be protected against an accusation of either by "Good Samaritan" laws.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:41 AM
13

27.3% of homeless are women 18.7% of homeless are youth and then suddenly the metric changes to % of shelter users... one has to wonder if that wasn't intentionally done to inflate some of the numbers. Also, if 28-34% of shelter population being indigenous is an over representation since 4.3% of the population is indigenous... Then 27.5% of homeless being women is an under representation.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:26 AM
2

They have all been English I may not know all the Doctors, but #12 (Capaldi) was Scottish
/r/MensRights20/10/18 04:56 PM
2

July 6th Ford contacted the Washington Post and Congresswoman Eshoo Julty 20~ Ford meets with Eschoo, states that she is worried that her identity will become public, and sends a letter to Feinstein Not liking facts does not make them a lie...
/r/MensRights13/10/18 04:31 PM
1

Which makes perfect sense... since people that want to keep their name out of the public often go to the media before sending letters to Senators...
/r/MensRights13/10/18 03:14 AM
1

I quoted the only actual reference to the testimony mentioned in the article (you did read the article, right? the one we're talking about here?) I did so because that's the only possible part of the article that could suggest a lack of familiarity with the testimony... and it fails to do so. I also watched her testimony, and didn't find anything credible about it. Emotional, yes, but not credible. To me, it all came across as a contrived attempt at eliciting sympathy.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:24 AM
25

It would seem to me that the article actually assumes that the reader is familiar with the testimony, and the hearings in general. the recent attempt by all the usual suspects to block Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court at the eleventh hour by destroying his character, reputation, and life, via salacious, unsubstantiated, and uncorroborated allegations of sexual misconduct dating back thirty-odd years to when he was but a teenager It was an 'eleventh hour' accusation. Feinstein w…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:32 PM
24

convicted of second-degree murder Friday in the stabbing death of her boyfriend. Boyfriend?! Who the hell gets into a relationship with a known false rape accuser?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 01:42 AM
4

Well, he was a novelist… so he made a career out of making shit up.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:58 PM
3

I would like to agree... generally. But, when a woman claims to have been raped by a Pokemon? No, we do not need to take her seriously.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:22 PM
2

Mudpuppy? is that slang for feminist now? /s
/r/MensRights29/06/18 05:22 AM
7

even if a man wanted to be a father, he would still require the mother's approval to be the father This, right here, is where logic fails. you're suggesting that men need permission to become fathers in order to have the choice to not be fathers. All that does is shift men's lack of reproductive agency from 'can't choose not to be a father' to 'can't choose to be a father'
/r/MensRights23/06/18 10:58 PM
3

since my separation they have fucked with me, got their kids to beat my son, harassed me constantly, hacked my computer and social accounts and spied on me using my PC Webcam maybe a tinfoil hat would help with all of that...
/r/MensRights23/06/18 07:48 PM
9

But lets further imagine that this came at the cost, in that, even if a man wanted to be a father, he would still require the mother's approval to be the father. Let's balance that out with the suggestion that women be required to have the man's permission before become mothers, and without that permission they be obligated to abort a pregnancy.. Still sound agreeable?
/r/MensRights23/06/18 07:41 PM
8

If you have to tell a group of people what they believe... you're probably wrong.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:00 PM
1

Anyone with even a grade school level science education should be able to recognize that sequential hermaphroditism (a unique reproductive strategy among teleosts that is displayed mainly in fish species living in the coral reef environment) has exactly zero to do with the simple male heteromorphic (XX female/XY male) sex determination system, or the male-inducing master sex-determining gene, SRY (located on the Y chromosome), in humans.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:23 PM
1

You would do better to direct that at the person that actually stated: I recall that from a scientific standpoint that the XX and XY chromosomes determine traditional male/female phenotypes. reading... it's a thing.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:43 PM
1

Still doesn't mean that science is going to define sex based on chromosomes. I hate to be the one to break it to you… but that's exactly how sex is defined.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:41 PM
1

Fortunately, real science can tell the difference between birds, platypuses, and humans. Real science also recognizes that a chromosomal disorder that affects less than .005% of the population and results in infertility doesn't qualify as a "gender".
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:22 PM
1

Plus-sized... the "l" is silent.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:34 PM
1

No True Scotsman in the march either...
/r/MensRights21/01/18 02:37 AM
8

Every time she puts on skin cream she can post a #MeToo
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:53 AM
1

Looks more like he was jailed for violating a court order, not actually for hugging his daughter.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 09:01 PM
3

2018 should be the year of responding to every #MeToo with#ToKillAMockingBird
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:55 PM
1

No, it's just what the 'men as ATMs' crowd has told you that decent countries do.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:42 PM
-1

Seriously? Universal health care, while it sounds good on the surface, is just another way to re-distribute men's earnings to fund other's needs. It diminishes the value of the male (husband/father) role in the family and effectively replaces it with 'government as daddy'. This is not a good thing, nor does it do anything to encourage self-sufficiency or personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:40 PM
1

... so now the left defines 'far left' and 'far right' and labels moderate as 'right center/moderate far right'. Like I said, this is the kind of delusion that lets the extreme keep getting more extreme while pretending to be moderate.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:02 PM
1

I suspect you've misunderstood my comment. There really is far left media, and doubtless far right as well. To deny the existence of one (far left) is to paint it as moderate and allow it to become even farther left by masking it's extremism as moderate. It does apply to both sides of the spectrum, but you were not asserting a lack of far right media.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 05:46 PM
1

This, here, is the kind of delusion that lets the extreme keep getting more extreme while pretending to be moderate.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:16 PM
1

I'll take 'Movies I won't be watching ever" for $500, please.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:07 PM
19

I don't think that #metoo is a game changer at all, I think the game changed some time back and #metoo is just making it visible to a wider audience. Here's the sad reality. I'll go out of my way to help someone in need… if it's a man. But I won't help a woman. The risk is too great. Call me callouses or cruel, or even misogynistic, go on a rant about how her life might be at risk. Doesn't matter, because helping her puts, not only my life at risk, but by extension the lives of my wife and child…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:53 AM
3

I'm not bashing, and don't blame, the girls. I blame the organizations leaders who didn't have the fortitude to stand their ground and say 'No. We built this, it's meant for boys, it's good for boys, and we won't break it to make you happy' rather than give in to the increasingly popular idea of inclusion at all costs and participation trophies.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:44 AM
3

That's sad... it's clearly not the Scouts that I remember from my youth. And I strongly suspect it won't be something that I want to involve my sons in.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:55 PM
9

Co-ed camping trips will be different, but otherwise it's all the same. Will is still be the same when the requirements for earning badges is, inevitably, lowered in the name of "equality"? How about when hikes are limited in length or to easier terrain so as not to 'disproportionately' exclude anyone?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 10:48 PM
4

As reprehensible as Ford is, who cares? is Ford responsible for the views of her parents? I'm for Men's Rights, my mother is the kind of feminist that believes men should be stripped of political power and many of their rights. So what? her views don't change the validity, or value of mine.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:36 PM
32

divHERsity team?... seems legit.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 02:48 AM
3

Providing free birth control only to women is discriminatory. Not providing free birth control to anyone is not. Sure, we'll hear a lot of wailing about how it's a 'war against women', but did anyone call it a war against men when we were denied the same free benefits? There's plenty of debate to be had about whether or not this is a good thing without falsely calling it discriminatory.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:30 AM
7

No one asserted that there was a need to say 'certain words'… and I think you missed the significance of fact that how the law is interpreted by judges and adjudicators is what defines it's practical impact. Section 67386(a)(1) of the Education Code reads An affirmative consent standard in the determination of whether consent was given by both parties to sexual activity. “Affirmative consent” means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity. It is the responsibi…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 07:11 PM
5

Do you always assume that anyone who disagrees with you is angry? And I wasn't attacking your character, just dismissing your false authority fallacy (hey look, two can play at this game) I have literally been in college for the last three years and had sex with students and non-students. Good for you buddy! We're all so proud of you, but it's irrelevant to the topic at hand.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 06:22 PM
4

Nice attempt at deflecting, but it's not reductio ad absurdum when the law defines it as affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity — throughout the encounter. Which means that any act that could be considered sexual in nature requires specific, and explicit consent. And no, according to the law, nonverbals are not okay. I'm sorry that your three whole years of college haven't given you the life experience to appreciate spontaneity and mutual trust within a relat…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:44 PM
18

Reality is illegal in CA
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:07 PM
1

This would suggest that when a mother denies the father access to his child, she is guilty of kidnapping as well. What if she hasn't 'napped' the kid at all and is just refusing access? Is it only kidnapping if she hides her location? What about women who refuse to name a father, or name the wrong man as the father, on the birth certificate? She is certainly denying access to the biological father. Does that make failure to accurately name the biological father kidnapping? I'm not really disagre…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:29 PM
5

Have you ever had sex? Assuming that the answer is yes, think back on the experience. Did you stop to ask for affirmative consent at every step? Can I sit next to you? Can I lean against you? Can I put my arm around you? Can I touch you? Can I kiss you? Can I touch you here? Can I nibble here? Can I unbutton this? And on and on… Now try to imagine what all of that would have done to the experience. Where's the intimacy? The connection? The spontaneity? The… Passion? The fact is, sex doesn't happ…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:02 PM
1

No doubt. But regardless of whether immigration is to blame for some, or even many, of the regions problems, to cherry pick what looks, on the surface, like a better gender balance and act as if it can be adopted in isolation, is naïve. Sweden, in particular, looks from afar to have better gender balance, but they are steeped in a toxic brew of ultra-feminism, emasculation, and a near totalitarianism that skirts dangerously close to fascism… should we even consider adopting all of that for the d…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 04:43 AM
1

What? I'm sorry, but you can't dismiss all of the regions problems by blaming them on immigration. Heavy reliance on coal and oil both for power and regional exports? High private debt? Reliance on the black market for common goods? Are these the result of immigration? Did immigrants cause the high tax rates? Or the relatively low earnings? And are immigrants carcinogenic? No? Then how are they to blame for the high cancer rates? And while one could attribute the growing economic divide to an in…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:43 AM
1

So. They have one if the highest personal debt levels, highest personal ecogical impacts. Some of thw highest individual tax rates in the world ( but not correspondingly high incomes ) the highest cancer rates, failing transportation infrastructure medical and educational servuces that are slipping. Increasing unemployment and a drastcly increasing portion of the population below the poverty line. ...but hey, they've solved all the problems with alimony and divorce! Which probably has no connect…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 06:36 PM
11

As if I ever needed Clementine Ford to tell me what feminism is about...
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:27 AM
7

you could say a man has more value in society than a woman I suppose that explains male disposability?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:00 AM
2

National Organization for Women. No one would call them radical, but their actions/beliefs are very clearly anti-male, and not for equality.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:50 AM
3

I can only speak to the companies I've worked at... so, any assertions about prevalence would be pure conjecture on my part.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 05:42 AM
5

When a job becomes a dead-end because of your identity... it's time to move on. That, and these days I'm more interested in work/life balance than working 'crunch time' hours.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 05:39 AM
39

I once had the dubious pleasure of working for a large tech company that adopted a gender/race diversity program. And it was an absolute shit show. Our release schedules were overly aggressive, meaning we were always looking at 'crunch time' for one project or another, and crunch time, during which 12-16 hour or longer work days were common, could go on for months on end. People burned out… so we had a fairly high turnover rate. And then the push for 'diversity'. Suddenly we were not hiring the …
/r/MensRights25/09/17 08:44 PM
4

only if you claim to know what''s best for your child... then you could even get her spayed and chipped. More seriously, drugs to stop a child pubescence? How can that not be child abuse?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:23 PM
3

+1 for creative use of 'astigmatism' astigmatism a·stig·ma·tism əˈstiɡməˌtizəm/Submit noun a defect in the eye or in a lens caused by a deviation from spherical curvature, which results in distorted images, as light rays are prevented from meeting at a common focus.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:12 PM
7

Educate yourself about NOW, one of the largest and most powerful feminist organizations, and then say that...
/r/MensRights23/09/17 04:36 PM
1

Not sure that they could handle the girth of a D-cell, better limit it to C and smaller.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 01:23 AM
2

Is it wrong that I immediately start imagining how much money one could make by buying targeted adds for vibrators in that sub?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 01:16 AM
2

No I do not... But that doesn't keep it from entertaining me as a well deserved counter to accusations of "mansplaining".
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:08 AM
3

Lately, I prefer to say that they are not explaining anything at all, just having a delusional 'femtasy'
/r/MensRights19/09/17 01:44 AM
2

I stopped reading as soon as the author attributed the idea of post-natal abortion to "the religious right" "The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." - Margaret Sanger 1920
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:32 PM
1

Don't give a shit... wonder why? because the suicide rate for teen boys is higher. and yet no one seams to care.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 06:57 AM
4

Every time I hear/see "Where have all the good men gone?" I'm reminded of Sally Gearhart's statement (and Krista Milburn's regurgitation of the same) "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race" … and I realize that I just don't care. Until women collectively disavow the rampant anti-male rhetoric, they can't expect us to be "good men". And if they think there's a shortage now...
/r/MensRights17/09/17 01:46 PM
5

The lack of a specific domain or metric makes this a useless question. Men are better by some metrics Women are better by other metrics This just makes men and women different. Nothing more. Nothing less.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 02:26 AM
6

if it's rape, then women lying about being on the pill, or deciding not to take it, is rape... but it's not "rape" if the sex is consensual. it's something. and arguable very wrong, possibly criminal, but not "rape". I highly doubt that we'll ever see a fair criminal classification. because, arguable, since women can always choose to abort a pregnancy or surrender an unwanted infant, the unavoidable costs of unwanted paternity far outweighs the unavoidable costs to the woman.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:03 PM
7

Hillary tries to stay relevant <shrug>
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:15 PM
4

And all this time I thought the little figure was a woman in a pant suit. /s
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:19 AM
15

He was asked. He denied it The audience member who was attacked told The Cambridge Student: “I was standing in the audience and was told by a fellow audience member that the name of the performer was ‘Abigail’. Given that I was enjoying the performance, I shouted out 'Let’s go Abigail!'. “After I shouted this, she came down from the stage. She slapped me and threw drinks on me.” And there will probably never be any followup unless the victim sues. As it stands Miss Destiny Frasqueri looks more l…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 01:14 AM
14

What evidence do we have the he was "being a fucking dick"? Other than the defensive claim from his attacker that he was 'mouthing dirty obscenities"?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 10:06 PM
20

Princess Nokia described the behaviour of the white male student who harassed her during her performance, saying that she could “see him mouthing dirty obscenities like, show me your tits.” In other words, no one saw him do anything, no one heard him say anything, and yet we're supposed to support the attacker. You know, the attacker that claims to be against violence. The attacker that expects us to believe that she's such a great lip reader that she can tell what someone in the audience is 'mo…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 10:02 PM
1

lol, about time.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 02:40 PM
1

Once upon a time marriage was legally defined such that, for all practical purposes, everyone had the same right… the right to marry a consenting legal adult of the opposite sex. Gay or straight, didn't matter. Everyone had the same right People wanted to change this. They wanted to redefine marriage. Did they advocate for removing the 'opposite sex' part? No. They could have, instead they advocated for 'gay marriage'. "Same thing" you say, and technically it is, but it's the narrative that prov…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 05:47 AM
1

you might want to read up on protected classes... they don't mean what you think they mean. Protected Class. A group of people with a common characteristic who are legally protected from discrimination on the basis of that characteristic. And that's the rub, we should all be equally protected from discrimination, shouldn't we? As for my knickers... Mine are so incredibly bunched up that I felt the need to criticize someones opinion. Oh... wait... that wasn't me, was it? Nor did I ever claim to b…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:07 PM
1

First, I didn't talk about laws. I mentioned 'rights'. I mentioned that I don't support special interest group 'rights'. The meandering attempt to invalidate my opinion is what brings us to laws. But since we're there. You'll note the existence of 'hate crime' laws. These all carve out 'protected classes' these are not equality laws. They provide greater protections to some groups than to others. How about Title IX, while neutral in theory, we all know that the application is not, instead it's a…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 03:13 PM
1

No, those are same sex marriage and anti discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 06:14 AM
0

relevance?
/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:07 PM
8

genderalise?
/r/MensRights09/02/17 08:15 PM
1

A law which allowed any/either parent to financially abort responsibility would be equal.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 08:01 PM
0

I would disagree. when a law is passed to explicitly protect one group, or provide for one group, it's not equal rights for all is it. As an example, laws that deal with the crime of rape are often treated as a subset of 'women's right', yet they often define rape such that only women qualify as victims. equal for all? no.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:37 PM
1

lets see... if we all have the same rights, are they "LGB rights" or equal rights for LGB people? I'll fight for the latter, not the former. Same with rights for men. Once we start with specially designated "rights" that only apply to a subset of the population we are only serving to increase divisiveness and laying the groundwork for future resentment between peoples.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:21 PM
1

I'll say it. I'm anti LGB rights. Or, more accurately, I'm anti any special interest rights. Human rights should be human rights equally applied to all, not handed out piecemeal to those said to deserver them more than others. Abortion? I'm anti-abortion. I'm also against laws dictating the choices other people can make… whether I like those choices or not. Are there morality issues about when a fetus becomes a person? Yes, but I don't claim to be an authority or have all the answers, so my opin…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 03:49 PM
6

Okay, well, that would put Australia at the top of the list of places to move to… except that it's full of scary shit that will kill you! Sydney funnel web spiders? Eastern Brown snake? Crocodiles? Taipan? Common death adder (I mean, seriously, it's got 'DEATH' in its name), Mulga snake, red-bellied black snake… the list goes on. It's like the entire continent was designed to kill people!
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:57 PM
–

I'm familiar with the Chevy volt (we got one for my mother last year), it's not an electric... it's a plugin hybrid. Oh, and you're going to want that home charging station. I've been through the trouble and expense of installing one before, no thanks. The Leaf? hardly. it's 84 mile range is useless for anyone that isn't a city dweller and has a longer commute, Of course you could spend extra to upgrade to 100 miles range... it also needs a home charging station. besides... you claimed" you can …
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:42 PM
–

You show me an electric that can make 400+ miles in a trip while carrying a family of four comfortably with 34+ cubic feet of storage at anywhere near the same price point and that doesn't come with the added expense of installing a home charging station... Guess what... you can't do it. Current best range is the Tesla Model S if I'm not mistaken, with a range that tops out around 265, a starting price of $68,000, the added trouble and expense of needing a home charging station, and worse reliab…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:08 PM
–

Was about to pull the trigger on an A3 e-tron... Now I think I'll just stick with the Prius.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:56 AM
1

men are weak. Weak, weak. If you ever want to take over the world just shave 18 minutes off the man's sleep time, and it's like I can't function I'm to groggy… Yep, I totally misunderstood. I thought he was saying that men are weak. weak, weak. If you shave 18 minutes off a man's sleep this is what happens, he doesn't wake up he sort of comes back to life like Jesus after a 3 day layover. He kinda stumbles his way down the stairs and he asks where everything is that's right there in front of him…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:08 PM
2

Posting about negative affects? That might have been a plausible claim if you had left out... Maybe give her a couple black eyes every friday night or every once in awhile force her to do the dishes while they give it to the neighbor lady instead... But even without that, I fail to see anything about the negative affects. Instead it reads more like flatulence aimed at a speech to text converter.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 04:41 PM
2

I'd classify this more as "shower thought ramblings" than brilliant. And did anyone listen to the whole thing? Men are weak? Men can't handle an 18 minute reduction in sleep? He falls into a classic male incompetence trope. I'm not overly familiar with Molyneux, but I don't think I'm a fan.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 01:04 AM
190

Legally Coercion means "any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that failure to perform an act would result in serious harm to or physical restraint against any person" So, yeah. Faking a pregnancy to compelled someone to get a vasectomy? That's coercion. Besides, y'all have heard of birth control, right?
/r/MensRights04/02/17 03:30 AM
366

It's either fraud or coercion. Neither is "a good cause'
/r/MensRights04/02/17 02:33 AM
1

"Alternative facts" and "subjective realities"... they're all the rage these days.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:52 PM
9

You haven't met my sister. Divorced parents? Yes. Father kept away? Yes. And she turned into one very extreme, very active, very outspoken, anti-male, gender feminist radical. Our home was a cesspool of victim hood, entitlement, and man bashing. Without a father figure or male role model there was nothing to counter the hate. And now? now she's a bitter, twice divorced, crazy feminist cat lady.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 05:48 PM
6

And he's guilty because...? proximity? If there had been any witnesses, would they be guilty as well? Because he took 3 hours to call the authorities? Scary precedent. Makes you wonder what the cut-off is for fast enough phone call before being considered guilty of manslaughter, 30 minutes? 10? 5? 30 seconds?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:10 AM
0

Yes, I got that. I'm suggesting that the right to prostitute ones self (or the lack of such a right) impacts women more than it impacts men, and is therefore not a men's issue. Though any such rights should be unilaterally applied to both sexes.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:54 PM
1

I would argue that prostitution is primarily a women's right. Not exclusively, since there are male prostitutes, but primarily, since most prostitutes are women. The question is, should people have the right to utilize their own bodies to earn an income.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:18 PM
4

u/Mistixs has said far worse, less intelligible, and more extreme things on many occasions. But she's off on her own private fantasy island, and the incoherent ramblings of one, seriously confused and disturbed individual, especially one as inconsequential, is nothing to raise an alarm about.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:18 PM
6

...according to Gina Spriggs, a North Carolina-based futurist and holistic intuitive... And that was enough for me right there. It's an article based on the ramblings of a women who is either a certifiable nut job, or a scam artist.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 05:43 AM
3

Yes, this sort of marketing bothers me, but I don't get offended, instead, I make certain that they don't get my business.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 02:50 PM
1

Only the most culinarily pusillanimous would equate an appreciation of spicy foods to being emo
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:59 AM
6

If by 'redistribution' you mean reducing the gap between the wealthiest and the poorest, then no one is saying that's incompatible with MRA. But a 'socialism' of the working class disproportionally burdens men. Who pay more into the system while taking less benefit from it… that's not redistribution of wealth, it's subsidizing one group at the expense of another.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:16 PM
3

Once upon a time I would have agreed. These days I feel more like women need to be men's allies before expecting us to support their fight... after all, they are fighting for a right that they don't want men to have.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:56 AM
23

The very idea of labeling anyone as "non-binary" amuses me... because the distinction of binary vs. non-binary is a yes/no, either/or, one or the other, binary distinction.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 04:39 AM
3

Men aren't mere objects... they're ATMs! I jest. She's actually fairly Men's Rights friendly
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:48 AM
12

Hmm... My wife has a drawer full of penises in the night table... guess that makes HER a threat to women. As for discussions about consent? I can sum it up thusly: "Son. a woman's consent is never to be trusted"
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:50 PM
0

Don't you know? Maths are hard! (and patriarchal)
/r/MensRights18/11/16 07:22 AM
11

If I ever see material sent home about a similar assembly at my boys' school... I'll be keeping them home that day. Then I'll be calling my educational consultant and my attorney.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:39 PM
5

More like: Young women report higher rates of mental illness...
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:40 PM
6

Didn't notice it... but then again, I can see the post. so, uhm... Not removed by mods?
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:21 PM
3

Again, relevance?... the benefits of marriage do not affect the invalidity of your claim to deserving compensation for something that has no value to the rest of us. Value is defined by the individual giving compensation... that no one is willing to compensate you means... zero value.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 08:12 PM
6

Relevance? or are you just doing more mental gymnastics? BTW: it's called marriage. If you're not familiar with the concept you might consider looking it up.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:44 PM
5

Nope. no value to me whatsoever... the only woman whose reproductive capacity has had any value to me, is my wife's. HER I support. You? The self proclaimed 20 year old bisexual virgin? Care to guess how much value your menstrual cycle has to me? None! Ditto women in general.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:33 PM
4

The don't deserve any compensation... your so called "suffering" provides no value to men, and consequently isn't worth anything to us. Start compensating men for their "suffering", and then we can talk.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:49 PM
2

I'd wager that he's tried the simple 'no thank you' in the past... and faced nagging demands of justification for denying the woman in question (no one expects the Spanish inquisition)... the pre-written detailed response is probably in reaction, and intended to save him the trouble of arguing his preferences any time he's not interested in someone.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:37 PM
3

Why don't we just assume that we're both familiar with your comment/post history, and drop the charade.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:49 PM
6

You were just arguing, in a different sub, that "Forcing males into fights", in the context of the draft, is natural, while opposing the draft solely because it might hurt individual women if they are included… so don't come over here and pretend to, as a woman, give two wits about men facing the draft.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:07 PM
11

bullshit... you posted this because you're trolling. otherwise you wouldn't be posting it here. and No, that's not a common idea in MRA circles... what is a common idea is that politicians and the media don't care about male only issues... you might have noticed that if you were not so obsessed with warping everything said to fit your narcissistic attitude.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:21 PM
9

I think you've mistaken this for a 'pat women on the back' feminist sub.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:41 PM
2

So, is Amandine Coget going to sign up for the draft? Join the military as a combat soldier? No? Hmm... just maybe there's something to this idea that female combat soldiers in games aren't realistic.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:28 PM
2

Personally, I call it femsplaining.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:51 AM
2

I found it, somewhat, amusing that the article referenced Jane Elliott's exercise… It may be intended to "have white people experience what it's like to be a minority", but if you ever watch a video of one you'll see something else important happen. The group that isn't getting the preferential treatment starts playing the victim card. They start asserting discriminations and hostility that didn't happen, and they get belligerent. The takeaway that everyone seems to ignore is that people misattr…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:02 AM
2

I am Sparticus Hugh Mungus.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:45 PM
5

well, there IS a male equivalent to "bitch", it's "bastard"
/r/MensRights03/09/16 01:27 AM
5

So can every defensive male stop using their voice for themselves... Because if we don't use our voice for ourselves, who will speak for us? Feminists? I think not.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:05 AM
9

This particular bias comes down to the simple fact that everybody likes boobies, but nobody likes an asshole.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:09 PM
5

Not even Bill wants to see that...
/r/MensRights01/09/16 06:02 AM
6

A quick google reveals plenty of criticism of Mathis, but for a nice summary example of his logic try this
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:06 AM
4

if most indoor office environments follow a temperature model that is based on the physiology of a 40-year-old, 154-pound man, then why is the problem only with AC in the summer and not also with heating in the winter?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:09 PM
13

February 22, 2016: Survivors UK, a charity supporting male rape victims, has received £78,000 in funding from the office of Mayor of London Boris Johnson
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:55 PM
5

...and nobody notices her arms are cut off? /s
/r/MensRights28/08/16 03:02 AM
1

That's an insult?… Dunning and Kruger posit that we tend to over value our knowledge/skills in a particular domain when we don't have enough knowledge/skill in that domain to adequately self evaluate. You have yet to offer anything in support of your position, and only ignore or criticize evidence and reason against it. The only reasonable inference is that you overestimate your knowledge in this area, and can't logically support your position.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:32 PM
1

Clearly you are experiencing the Dunning-Kruger effect. Also, still waiting on those news reports...
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:29 PM
1

Ah, yes. The 'No True Scotsman' Fallacy… I'm sorry, but you don't get to narrow the definition of AI to exclude examples that contradict your assertions. Let's assume that you are intelligent… you're not going to argue that point, right? 95% of humans have an IQ in the range of 70 - 130, so we'll assume that yours is in that range. To be generous we'll assume it's at the top of the range at 130. Now, Artificial Intelligence isn't synonymous with Super intelligence. An AI could well have the IQ o…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:18 AM
9

Miss Gill doesn't understand why 'lads' aren't interested in her. Meanwhile she blames them for her loneliness while making insulting comments about their gonads... never seems to occur to her that our gonads are fine, we just don't want to share them with women like her.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 01:51 PM
1

semantics? really? sorry if my morning, pre-coffee, use of colloquials isn't up to your standards, but that's equivocation. The machines you are referring... there were three... and the point still stands. Neither a roomba, nor a Testla, nor Watson have built 'skynet'... add to that list, 4CAPS, ACT-R, AIXI, Blue Brain Project, CALO, CHREST, CLARION, CoJACK, Copycat, DUAL, Emotion Machine, EPIC, FORR, Google Brain, iDA, LIDA, NuPIC, OpenCog Prime, the Procedural Reasoning System, R-CAST, SOAR, S…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:19 PM
7

I don't think they understand their degree in 'Peace, Conflict, and Development studies'... unless the 'Conflict' portion was about how to create conflict.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:51 PM
1

You do realize that coding style has nothing to do with AI, right? Intelligence is the ability to acquire and apply knowledge... And we aren't there? This... and this... Again, you're confusing Artificial intelligence with the mimicking of human cognitive function.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:46 PM
1

And there's we have the root of it. It is an AI, though not a very "intelligent" one. You're making the classic mistake of equating Artificial Intelligence with Artificial Consciousness. They are not the same thing. Look, we get it, you watched the Terminator movies, you're afraid of 'skynet' and now you're doing a wonderful job of proving Pinker's point. But the ability of AI, or any software for that matter, to interact is limited by its I/O. That I/O has to be available both at the software a…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:09 PM
1

Let's try another line of reasoning… your Rumba? Has it taken over your house? Has it hijacked your blender? Commandeered your microwave? Infected the cable company by accessing it through your TV? Has it gone back to its charging station, and sent little electric pulses back through the power lines to take over the local power grid? Yeah, I didn't think so.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:12 PM
1

... said the marine to the software engineer. and no, it's not possible. Not unless the system on which the AI is running is explicitly built with circuits to measure the primary power input. Oh, and that's assuming (massive assumption by the way), that there isn't an external power regulator/filter. Oh, and you still need equipment specifically designed to allow you to send power back to the grid such as inverters, converters, charge controllers, and output controllers. and balance-of-system to…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:17 PM
1

Somebody has been reading/watching too much science fiction. Consider this question; if you're at the doctors office, getting your blood pressure measured, can you modulate your blood pressure to communicate with the monitoring equipment and connect to the computers in the doctors office? No? do you suppose that's because you aren't 'built' that way?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:43 PM
1

oh!oh! I know this one! it's "a cat"! Behind every successful woman is a cat! ...or many cats!
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:44 PM
1

The problem with AI is it's ability to grow beyond our control. Only if it's built that way.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:40 PM
2

I had the same thought, but let's remember that Pinker's work can make for an interesting, and even thought provoking, read. But it's just pop-science aimed at selling more books... he is, effectively, the consumer grade science niche of mass media.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:39 PM
3

What the hell did I just read? Why the hell did I read it? Was that an exercise in schizophrenia? And how, if at all, did any of that relate to Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:11 AM
6

should Redditors read articles before posting them with inaccurate titles? (Not Parody)
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:29 PM
1

it's hard to see the depth of a man's character through the fog of contempt... And, no. You don't know. You believe... and I believe that you are blinded by your own insecurities which, in turn, are fuel for your unhappiness and misery, Then you're whipping that up into a vitriolic froth, and flinging it at men as a group. Also, take a look around you, half the population is of below average attractiveness, but nobody is that ugly unless they are trying to be.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 01:37 AM
4

...and you wonder why you can't find a husband boyfriend?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:02 AM
2

well, it certainly isn't her personality that makes her a better person...
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:52 AM
2

mirin? presumably you meant "admiring" and you'll excuse me for not believing that for a second. Based on your comments, it's clear that you don't believe that male, or masculine, is a favorable trait. Actually I believe in female superiority, so male on male violence doesn't bother me. If anything it amuses me and I'm happy that men don't care about men. and Men protect women and children... From other men. You're the problem. and What difference does it make when men are the majority of the cr…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:50 PM
3

... now don't be a hypocrite, a few hours ago you were body shaming a female body builder over in /r/cringe THIS MANLY LOOKING WOMAN CAN GET A HUSBAND AND I CAN'T? kills self
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:21 PM
1

It's always "everyone" and "people" and "society" and "women". … always Absolutes… a sure sign of two things; intellectual inferiority, and low effort. If all you want to do is bait the members of this sub, you're going to need to try a bit harder. If you like, I could recommend some great books on logical reasoning and debate, maybe you could establish a basic understanding of inference rules and symbolic logic and then come back with some ability to actually discuss things intelligently. Alter…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 06:09 PM
3

That's a cute inference, but again, you're attempting to define the conversation that men should have here, by asserting how men feel about a topic based on your opinions. Allow me to suggest that Men's Rights include the right for men to decide what they want discuss with each other...
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:25 PM
3

Sorry squirt, it's because you're not here to have a discussion about men's issues, you're here to vilify/blame men. The fact is, this is a space for men to discuss issues that men feel are important regarding men's rights. This is not a space for men to discuss issues that someone else dictates should be important to men.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 03:48 PM
1

because I'm psychic! /s That, and if you had posed a similar question in a feminist sub, you would be posting a links to prove your point...
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:42 AM
1

He should vote how he wants... and hire a good divorce lawyer.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:29 AM
2

Trolling effort aside, you can't possibly be that daft! I didn't bring women's issues into anything, I highlighted the hypocrisy of your question. Also, the seriousness of women being catty (conveniently ignoring inter woman violence and women's violence/neglect against children) has nothing to do with the assessing the value of Men's Rights topics.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:28 AM
2

Isn't this a bit like asking why feminists don't focus on the high rate of domestic violence in lesbian couples? Or why they don't focus on women fat shaming each other, or women slut shaming each other, or the high rate of women committing child neglect, or the high rate of women committing child abuse…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:16 AM
1

How about the right to vote? Women have the right by default, men have to sign up for selective service to earn the same right, we don't just get it by default. Men have a number of other 'rights' tied to signing up for selective service. Qualifying for Federal aid, Federal grants, Federal loans, some 'government benefits' eligibility for federal employment. In some states the list also includes driver's licensing, state-funded higher education benefits, state government jobs… How about rights f…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 10:05 PM
5

It's all very simple… if they created a new festival featuring only women playwrights, and if this femstival fails, well, then they look like talentless losers. However, if they take an existing festival, and convert it to featuring only women playwrights, then when it fails, they can blame patriarchy and misogyny by suggesting that regular festival goers bailed because, and only because the playwrights are women.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 08:47 PM
1

Well, there are only two kinds of 'rights', moral and legal. I defy you to find an example of either that men have but women do not.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 07:56 AM
1

The question is meaningless. Here, women have every right that men have, and many that men don't, so the idea that gender equality requires men to fight for women's 'rights' is either a red herring, or a furthering of the feminist 'heforshe' narrative that paints women as helpless and dependent on the actions of men.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 04:05 PM
7

Not all of us.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:56 AM
55

This, of course, misses the mark entirely. Fans of the original don't object to a female cast per se. What we object to is a completely new cast with no transitional story line. We object to bad acting and bad writing. We object to having a politically contentedness hammer masquerading as comedy... and when the shrieks of 'misogyny' start it starts to look like this is little more than a bad movie length gender studies man bash. Bases on the previews I had no interest in seeing this movie... bas…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:48 PM
2

Meanwhile, I'll be teaching my sons that no one should assume that they are rapists by default, that they don't need to be taught not to rape, and to treat all people respectfully.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:44 PM
1

Of course there is! Just call The Patriarchy and have them exclude these women from any social discourse and then publicly shame them into submission. ...What's that? There is no Patriarchy? Well then, i guess there isn't much you can do about this particular brand of stupid.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 01:00 AM
13

That's "hetero-normative cis gendered white male" to you.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:28 PM
122

Don't you know? it's not sexism, it just offsets your inherent male privilege. <sarcasm>
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:37 PM
74

Please consider an archive.is link... some of us prefer not to give buzzfeed additional clicks/views to monetize.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:42 AM
3

Ah, I get it now. it's shallow of me to not want a feminist in office because you've assumed that my opposition to feminist politicians is that simple.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:20 PM
2

How, exactly, is not wanting a feminist for president shallow?
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:39 AM
7

I don't actually care if he's a MRA or not, as long as he's not a feminist he's better than Clinton.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:19 AM
1

sacbee barely qualifies as a newspaper. It seems to exist primarily as an avenue for getting politically motivated "articles" in front of bored politicians in the state capitol. edit for spelling
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:57 AM
1

Mansplaining is the application of logic, by a man, when disagreeing with a woman,
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:46 AM
7

Not everyone here is a man Not all of the men here are dads Not all of the dads here are divorced Right off the bat I would say the answer is no. Personally, my primary interest is in preserving the rights of my sons...
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:11 AM
5

<sigh> It was a bit of humor, but I guess you're too young to remember Ti Kwan Leap
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:27 PM
-5

All i see is a couple of women that need a boot to the head.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:49 AM
2

Value doesn't end with the ability to make babies... it extends to having those babies grow up and be reproductive themselves. At the end of the day, the "sexual market" is about ensuring the survival of our genes. Older women... mothers, grandmothers, etc. add value by supporting the family. Might be financial support, might be emotional support, might be domestic work, or teaching younger generations... The woman who wrote the 'article'? she had eight children with her husband. I'm going to go…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:54 PM
2

Women have a single asset? Really? Their bodies? That, friend, is the narrative of the feminist. Or rather, their story is that men think the way you do. A woman, even a post menopausal woman can still cook, and clean. She can talk and think, she can be a painter, a musician, a computer programmer, a corporate executive... In short, she lacks only one asset… fertility. If you think that's all women are worth I truly feel sorry for you.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:54 AM
4

Wasn't there already an all woman remake a while back called Ghostluster? I'll be he didn't review that one either.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:36 PM
12

wait... that's a guy? I would have thought it was a gender-fluid Social Justice Weiner with two X chromosomes.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:03 PM
3

I think that he's a charlatan that preys on those that are socially awkward or lacking self esteem.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:30 PM
1

It all started with the British Act of 1839, and it's been a downward spiral ever since.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:36 AM
3

why bother being bitter about it... I mean, sure, it bothers me too, but I don't need the media, or society in general, to celebrate me on fathers day. My kids, and my wife, do that. And I don't get the short end of the stick, I get pretty much the same thing that my wife gets on Mother's Day... breakfast in bed, a day with my family, taken out to dinner, 'crafts' from the kids, and a gift from the wife... A healthy family will celebrate both, and the onus is on us (and our spouses) to build a h…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 03:52 AM
1

Define "older"... but yes, 46 here, and happily married. So, it does happen.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:09 AM
2

The next ‘Equal Occupational Fatality Day’ will occur on December 20, 2023
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:34 PM
3

careful with that thought... don't give the governments any ideas or they may decide that they should tax us for unpaid labor based on some 'fair market value'
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:04 AM
11

This sort of thing happened to me as well. Not much to be done about it except to keep taking our kids to parks, and keep doing what we do. Get enough fathers out with their kids and it wont look abnormal anymore.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:10 PM
3

This, I can agree with. And to be fair, I sometimes have difficulty seeing / acknowledging the mask. Having spent my teen years trapped in a house where I was the only male surrounded by rabid feminists and all their anti-male rhetoric, I do tend to bristle a bit at any suggestion that feminism is, by action or words, about equality.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:51 PM
4

I have to disagree... strongly. Feminism only ever says that it is about equality as a defense when challenged about it's hostility towards men, and it only ever says it in the media. Get a room full of feminists together and listen... you won't hear a word about equality for men. You'll hear about "wage gaps", and "rape epidemics", and the "need" for reparations from men. You'll hear about the innate misogyny of language, and history, and logical thinking. You'll hear about manspreading, manspl…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:28 PM
10

Feminism runs rampant in my family, I've heard enough, and seen enough to know that "NAFALT" is a load of BS. Included in my family are some prominent members of NOW, so I take their attitudes to be, at least, compatible with the prevailing attitudes of one of our countries largest feminist organizations. And what do they say? They say that men should be barred from holding political positions, they say that men's incomes should be capped, they say that men shouldn't get custody of children, the…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:33 AM
1

sure, and for some types of purchases that's fine, but for me, ebay is a source for vintage electronics, and unless I'm after something for parts, I want to know that it's working, that it's been cared for, serviced, etc. And I have more faith in someone who regularly, or mostly, sells electronics. In the same way, I am more comfortable buying at an electronics swap meet, than at a garage sale.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:22 PM
1

Well, the article did get one thing right... sort of. If I'm buying electronics on eBay, and the seller is also selling shoes and a purse, I''m not likely to buy. ... But not because I think the seller is a woman, rather, because the seller is clearly just dumping extra crap from their home rather than being a respectable vendor for the product I'm looking to buy.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:08 AM
10

... except that giving women, but not men, all the benefits of full citizenship without signing up for selective service is one hell of a preference.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:16 AM
1

I can't say that I'm surprised... it's become politically untenable to do research that doesn't include, or focus on, women. I read somewhere recently (sorry, I can't recall the source), that research grants are often denied for male focused studies these days.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:13 AM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you. Based on the document you shared we're significantly under represented. <humor> Maybe it's because women have more in common with lab rats than men do... </humor>
/r/MensRights18/02/16 03:59 AM
1

I don't know any current sources, but I was at the NIH just last week with my sons' participating in a study specifically focused on men and boys, so it does happen, even if we are underrepresented.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 03:19 AM
2

I've been reading that book... or trying to. But it's hard to get through because the author comes across as a bit of an ideology > facts nutjob.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:57 AM
2

I, for one, find nothing wrong with the sub title being plainly visible. And if anyone around me reacts negatively to it? Well, they've just advertised that they are close minded bigots that I can discount as irrelevant to any intellectual discussion.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:52 AM
1

I'm fresh out of troll feed. :(
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:06 PM
2

Hey look! a Troll!
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:07 AM
1

uhm, no... in a human cell there are 22 pairs of autosomes, and two 'sex' chromosones... one X chromosome, and either an additional X, or a Y chromosome. There is nothing disproportionate about it's importance.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:50 PM
5

Because having two Y chromosomes is actually a fairly rare. (about 1 in 1000 males)
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:54 AM
4

I couldn't help thinking the same thing... maybe someone should do a study to show that vibrators have a negative impact on women's attitudes towards men. It would at least be worth a laugh to watch the fem-o-sphere get all upset and indignant.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:07 PM
3

MRM has, and will continue to, attract ultra-conservatives, and moderates, and liberals, and... well... a mix of all sorts of social-political views. So what? You think it should be an exclusive club where only people of your political leaning support a cause? To be blunt: Get over it, or move along.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:02 AM
7

Add to that the fact that many schools actively avoid hiring male teachers to protect the school itself from the same false accusations...
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:58 PM
2

Seems fine to me... consider, If I was to rent out a room in my home, there are two types of people I would not want to risk living with... feminists, and false rape accusers. Simple solution would be to post an add for "Male only". Given that, you can't get too upset when others use the same kind of logic to be selective about who they want to share a home with.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:10 AM
8

So easy to be brave when you follow so far behind a male meat shield.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:56 PM
2

What? Is someone selling tupperware? I could use more tupperware!
/r/MensRights17/07/15 04:24 AM
5

If I were in Massachusetts, someone would have just lost my vote.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:55 PM
17

Wish that I had more to offer... about the only thing I can suggest is that you focus on your grief and not on any animosity towards your friend's wife. Anger may be justified, but it won't help you cope.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:53 PM
5

The push for affirmative consent ensures that video recording of sexual encounters is inevitable… proof of initial consent is already under attack since consent can be revoked at any time, and consent after the fact has been attacked with claims that we can’t judge how a woman might behave/react after a sexual assault… and that leaves proof of ongoing consent. There’s really only one way to provide that. Marcotte and her ilk are going to have to accept that THEY created this situation. Besides, …
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:35 PM
3

since you clearly missed the next sentence... Privilege, by definition, is benefit beyond what the majority of, or most, people get. Go ahead, look it up. you'll note it isn't defined as a lack of discrimination. As for white folks cira 1850... well, 'white folks' is too broad a category. the Irish slaves in america at the time, for instance, often had it as bad, or worse than their African counterparts. And the average industrial worker was certainly not privileged. Granted, an individual born …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:35 PM
2

The lack of discrimination does not, in any way, equate to privilege. Privilege, by definition, is benefit beyond what the majority of, or most, people get. So if 'most' people are 'cis' then, by definition, 'cis' does not equate to privileged.... insofar as the OP is cis, the op is most certainly not privileged.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:56 PM
3

May well be, though my reaction was a little bit tongue-in-cheek. The real solution to false accusations won't be just to teach women not to make them. Rather, it needs to be a combination of men learning to minimize the risk of being falsely accused and a civil/criminal justice system that takes false accusations seriously and hands down sufficiently severe penalties for them...
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:47 AM
27

Shouldn't we focus on teaching women not to falsely accuse ? Or do we first have to proclaim that we live in a false accusation culture?
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:58 PM
3

Fair enough. More than enough actually. a bad mod, or worse an undercover anti-MRA mod, would be a disaster. Also, I think I live in a bit of a bubble offline... where I can safely assume that a fair percentage of the people around me are computer geeks to some degree. I forget, sometimes, that online is much larger than the microcosm of my day-to-day.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:27 AM
4

A question, and not meant to be critical at all, but why would the mods here not be as technically capable? I mean, I do SQA / DevOps and I would have thought that there are plenty of others here that are technically savvy. Edit to add: Also wanted to say that I fully support the blackout, though it did catch me by surprise...
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:59 AM
2

All you need to do is point out that what they are saying sounds suspiciously like 'victim blaming'.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:18 AM
1

Right, so if the problem is hate against certain groups (though I would argue that hate against any group is a problem), and slurs that are used against "people as an insult" then the problem is with hurtful or hateful behavior... i.e. being a jackass, and not about censoring out particular words just because we've decided that we can't handle them. People that hate will do so... with, or without, using words from some 'unacceptable words' list.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:21 PM
1

Sure, and so what. The world is a big place, and it's full of different people with different ideas and views and opinions... and different ways of expressing them. We're not going to agree with, or like, all of it, we might even consider some of it 'offensive'. Welcome to the real world. We all, collectively, need to grow up and get over this idea that there is something inherently bad about anything that offends us. We need to stop acting like we can't handle anything unpleasant and should be …
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:58 PM
1

I certainly do not go out of my way to be offensive to anyone, but I usually pay no mind to the political correctness, or lack thereof, of the words I use. And occasionally I catch flack about it... but when someone is so thin skinned, the problem is with their delicate sensibilities, and not with my choice of verbiage.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:27 AM
7

She should pitch her idea for a Jane Bond movie to the studios and see how far she gets...
/r/MensRights19/06/15 11:15 PM
14

What's next? will femenists demand a re-write of the the bible with the Virgin Larry giving birth to Jezabele?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 11:14 PM
1

I suspect that Obama has better taste in porn than 'The False Rape of Mattress Girl'
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:07 AM
8

She said it in a speech at the CONFERENCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SAN SALVADOR, EL SALVADOR -- NOVEMBER 17, 1998
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:16 AM
28

Hillary Clinton at the Democratic Presidential Debate, Manchester, New Hampshire, June 3, 2007 "…freedom is never granted. It is earned by each generation…" I suggest we earn our freedom by not electing Clinton!
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:31 AM
64

She made her entire political career a gender issue by saying things like this: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children" ABC for President in 2016! (Anyone But Clinton)
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:19 AM
7

This! Seriously! Think about it for just a second. This person thinks YOU are a rapist... and if they think that way about you, they are not your friend.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:06 PM
1

In addition to pressure through guilt or shame, allow me to suggest a scenario that I experienced when I was a bit younger... Go to a party Drink a bit much Pass out Wake up to a woman getting herself off on your erection Congratulations, you've just been raped!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:34 PM
1

This is one of those instances where "guilty until proven innocent" just isn't true anymore. The onus is on him to prove that he isn't guilty, and for that he'll need a good lawyer. That, and take a look at the Aids for the Wrongly Accused at Comminity of the Wrongly Accused (left side panel)
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:12 AM
6

Femterbation refers to mental stimulation, especially of one's own ego(self femturbation), often to the point of absurdity. Femturbation is a common form of ego-eroticism, and the two words are often used as synonyms, although femturbation with a partner (mutual femturbation) is also common.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:19 AM
0

it's worthwhile. Else we'll end up with one of them in the White House.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:39 PM
0

Sounds about right. I find it most noticeable when a group of people are walking three or four abreast. Men generally make an opening to let others through. Women, on the other hand, act as if everyone should deffer to them and step into the street if needed to get out of their way.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:37 PM
1

You could organize a /r/MensRights volunteer day, maybe even an annual or semi-annual volunteer day. We could co-ordinate to volunteer in groups at our respective local shelters, soup kitchens, and such. I have squat in the way of available time myself, but would commit to finding someone to watch the kids and participating in such an event if it were to occur.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 09:34 PM
2

I have, a few times, but certainly not as often as I've seen net-fems complain about it, and given that I open doors for people all the time, those few times, while memorable, are a tiny minority.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:13 AM
11

What’s significant about this is that lack of inequality that resulted in the boys team being punished. The parents of the boys team raised money, bought, and installed new bleachers… the parents of the girls team had an equal opportunity to do the same. When our government, and fellow citizens, fail to understand that true equality is equality of opportunity and not guaranteed equal results, this is what happens. Those that put in time, effort, and money are ultimately punished because other, l…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:24 PM
1

He wouldn't even need a sceenshot (assuming this is real), social media posts are discoverable and admissable as evidence in court...
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:08 PM
2

My only recomendation so fsr... private school. Find one in your area that encouages boys to suceed as boys!
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:06 PM
1

There were certainly MRA's participating, but it seems to me that our biggest problem is what we're saying... tweets that equate rape culture to the nastiness of faminism play right into the image of MRAs as whiny angry men that the faminists love so much. We would be much better served by supporting the notion of 'rape culture' and redefining it as the problem of social and legal attitudes in response to male rape victims while letting the feminists make themselves look bad by flinging insults.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:10 AM
37

You can call it rape, or statutory rape, you can even call it sexual assault, but to call it underage sex is extreme media bias and, quite frankly, offensive.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:12 AM
12

Kudos to RAINN for their recent recomendations and kudos to Time for publishing oposition to the critisizm RAINN is recieving about it... and not just because I don't want my boys grow up in a culture where they are guilty by accusation, but because equality and stoping violence are prefferable to villifying half of the population!
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:44 AM
2

You're right, I in no way suggest that it does. It was a humorous quip intended to illustrate the fact that as long as men are treated differently in a field (e.g. child care/babysitting), a difference in pay should be expected and is not something to get riled up over.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:38 PM
37

If I were to even consider working as a baby sitter I would indeed charge more… why? base rate + hazard pay And given the risk of a man being accused of inappropriate behavior when alone with kids, hazard pay is completely appropriate!
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:45 PM
0

Seams to me that the assumption that the boys intent was malicious come from A. thinking that there is an intruder in the house/daughters bedroom and B. from the daughter claiming that she didn't know who he was. I suspect that most of us would be "trigger happy" if there was, what we thought was, an intruder in our kids bedroom in the middle of the night regardless af anyones gender.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:08 AM
1

I'm sorry, but how is this a mens rights issue? The kids both made bad decisions about sneaking the boy into the girls house... but when it comes to the confrontation the dad is in a panic because he thinks there is an intruder in his daughters room, the girl is in a panic because she just got caught with a boy, and the boy is in a panic because he's being confronted by the girls dad...
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:37 AM
1

Why the 2001 report? It’s 13 years out of date! The most recent report available looks to be 2012…. Edit to add. In the 2012 report, Table 3-13 "Victims by Perpetrator Relationship, 2012 " can be found on page 46.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:22 PM
2

It really does not matter what this study claims to have found… All it takes is one raging feminist exploding into a fit of hostility when a door is held open to make one think twice about holding a door open for anyone ever again… I've held doors open for countless people, and the only ones I remember individually are the few raging beasts. But I do remember those, and all the Purdue Researchers can’t alter the facts of those confrontations, nor can they alter the dampening such experience has …
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:00 PM
5

This kind of thing is one of the big reasons that my boys go to a private school that provides lots of outdoor activity time, and actually encourages unstructured play.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:12 AM
2

Should that be "oppressed" or"oppressive"?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:42 PM
3

She’s what, 19 now? So with an average life expectancy for women in the United States of 82,2 years a life sentence would be a little over 62 years. Which is more inhumane? 62+ years of prison? Or death? And, if we assume an afterlife, death isn't inhumane at all! It just takes those 62+ years and tacks them onto an already infinite afterlife.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:20 PM
7

One has to wonder if Terry O’Neill, president of NOW and author of that statement on the NOW website, even took the time to read Taranto’s article... O’Neill claims “James Taranto stated that in sexual assault cases where both the victim and rapist are drunk -- both parties are equally to blame for the attack.” He didn’t. Not once. What he did do was make a point of distinguishing between intoxicated sex that is later regretted and sexual assault that may involve drinking, and he quoted Winerip’…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:08 PM
-2

Sorry, I was grossly unclear. Price did not celebrate the attack. My comment about not celebrating it was inwardly directed towards us here, and our potential response to the article.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 06:33 PM
3

W.F. Price needs to be called out on something... presuming that the targeted sites were more vulnerable due to not having "male techies on staff" and asserting that "women generally consider tech work beneath them" are both unproductive and sexist. We can't hope to gain any support if, as a group, we are seen as being as sexist as those we speak out against. Far better that we call attention to the hypocrisy of feminists claiming to fight for 'equality' than being seen as hypocrites ourselves. …
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:39 PM
2

That kind of thing happens all the time. In part its audience targeting, Amazon is targeting women with this program believing that women (moms in particular) are more price sensitive and can be induced to spend more… and in part it’s the socially accepted expectation that mothers are the ‘primary’ or more active parent.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:17 PM
2

Sadly, this is par for the course these days. Just yesterday while talking with two prominent members of NOW I made the mistake of commenting that a particular middle aged woman taking an unusual interest in a particular twelve year old girl was ‘creepy’… their response? It’s only creepy if it’s a man taking interest in a child.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 07:03 PM
1

I wish I could agree. but it does take two people, if a man and woman both make a choice to engage in behavior that can result in pregnancy, then they are both responsible for the outcome. We can't very well say that we can have our fun but only the woman should shoulder the consequences of mutual actions. If, as men, we want greater sexual freedom without the risks of pregnancy, then we should be supporting efforts to develop and approve male oral contraceptives, and legislation allowing for pa…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:11 PM
2

Before using that as an argument you might want to read this That said, you'll be lucky if you don't get accused of "mansplaining", or of being a misogynist for challenging the "our body, our choice" mantra.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 09:58 PM
15

Someone should stress the serious impact that the false accusation had on that innocent man.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:42 PM
19

<sigh> I miss the days when my twins were small enough to hold like that.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:17 PM
4

Not buying into the idea that feminists will see limited marriage and financial options as the results of their own activism hardly makes me a ‘men’s rights doomsayer’ In fact, it has nothing to do with men’s right or my attitude about them at all… I’m a big believer in men’s rights and moving towards true gender equality.I am also a believer in human nature and people’s blind spot when it comes to blaming their own actions or belief systems for negative outcomes. If you want feminists to acknow…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:23 PM
5

You've mistaken realism for cynicism. Feminist groups have consistently denied and even suppressed facts and opinions that are not in alignment with the idea that men are oppressors and women victims. To suggest that they will suddenly turn around and acknowledged that degradation of women’s financial status is due to their own ‘activism’ is the most foolish kind of fantasy.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:47 PM
7

"At this point a lot of discussion will appear and it will prove the mra movement right." Except that isn't how the feminists will spin it. They'll claim that it's the patriarchy treating them unfairly and just more proof that women are discriminated against.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:34 PM
2

Very true, and in any case were the doctor suspects that any such pressure may exist they are entirely right to see the patient privately, I will argue, however, that a good doctor will also recognize that both partners involved in a pregnancy have either entered into a long term commitment together, or have a shared interest in avoiding said commitment. Both have a vested interest… supporting them as a couple can have benefits, and help strengthen developing familial bonds, while alienating the…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:30 PM
4

I suppose that may happen, but I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest that it mostly happens for initial pregnancy tests rather than any follow-up / pre-natal appointments. Once upon a time I attended many appointments of a pregnant girlfriend, more recently I attended almost every appointment when my wife was pregnant. The only times I was asked to leave was during fetal heart monitoring, and then only if it was done in a communal room and other patients were present, and during prep for an …
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:21 PM
24

You’re not going to be “kicked out” if the woman doesn’t want you to be… especially if you’re the husband/father-to-be, and if she doesn’t want her partner to be there it should send up some pretty hefty red flags.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:47 AM
98

An intelligent man, faced with a positive test, insists on accompanying the woman to the doctor for a follow-up. You know, out of concern for her health… to make certain that there are no complications. It’s all about her, and her health, and the pregnancy. Well, that and making certain that you aren’t getting seriously dicked over. There is really only one reason she would resist support from her partner… The women selling these tests are certainly pretty low on the moral chart themselves… I wo…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter