TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TyroneFreeman Archive

View 5 posts and 71 comments by TyroneFreeman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Outlawing linking does not mean you're outlawing the publication of that thought. You're simply depriving them of page views, which is the reason for their existence. You can easily screenshot the article and post it on imgur, or copy/paste the article onto pastebin if you really want to link it here.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:57 PM
3

You could also reason that being kicked out of a toxic environment is actually a good outcome. Might give the addict the space he needs to sort himself out.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:38 PM
9

Nope, it's a very overt acknowledgment that the current system allows for bogged-down family courts through which the lawyers can charge more hours for worse results.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:13 AM
2

Failure to pay child support is a civil violation, although there's jail time attached. This means you won't be extradited from your new country to face the system. The most they could do is embargo any remaining assets in the previous country and sell them off.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 11:05 PM
1

All rape accusations are mere words unless the accused is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:42 AM
5

Descartes would be proud of you.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:38 AM
2

Regardless of any secondary effects, we also come to the statutory provisions that themselves prohibit any gender discrimination in terms of pricing. Women routinely use more healthcare resources, in part due to their greater concern over their health and due to maternity care. Since insurance companies will no longer be allowed to discriminate on prices, part of this disparity will either shift to men, while women's prices lower slightly; or men's prices are raised to the same point.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:06 PM
8

The prison guard was also brutal, abusive, psychotic, and completely irredeemable.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:02 PM
4

They're also the most "progressive" sport regarding transsexuals; they allowed a MtF to compete with females instead of forcing the person to fight with males or an outright ban.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:38 PM
2

Protip: At least in California, you can still use illegally-obtained evidence to impeach witness testimony and/or to prove perjury on their part.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:55 AM
0

It means if the majority of the evidence supports the accusation, notwithstanding any remaining reasonable doubts.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:21 PM
12

Another fun fact: since the UCMJ applies to soldiers, the cheating civilian spouse does not fall under its jurisdiction and would not be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:15 PM
11

Just because something is a joke and originates from a less than reliable site does not detract from its message if the message itself is genuine. Plus, given the lack of moderation in 4chan, it also presupposes a lack of censorship. This means I've had much more fruitful discussions in /pol/ as I've not had to fear a moderator shadow-banning me or getting down-voted to the ninth circle of hell for airing a controversial opinion.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 05:22 AM
4

Only female tears.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:04 PM
2

I'd just like to think what the reaction would have been had the police intervened. Probably a huge media uproar calling the whole thing a bloodbath or massacre instigated against young, pure, defenseless women. It's probably because of that that the police did not intervene. Though that in no way justifies their negligence.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 05:24 PM
3

There are other ways to go about doing the same thing without overt racism, such as more advertising targeting the uninterested white guys.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:46 PM
159

If they call him out, he should tell them he "identifies" as female, and see what their reaction is.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:12 PM
2

FYI, for any further overtures from anyone asking for money, just have a blanket no soliciting in the workplace policy. That way you can simply point to the policy. If she still cries misogyny/rape afterwards, you can at least save face with everyone else about the equal application of said policy.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:51 AM
1

Quite a bit of a fallacy though. Federal income tax might be some of the lowest out there, but that obviously doesn't include state income, property, and sales taxes. In many of these cases, the effective tax rate would be similar to many European countries.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:51 PM
1

Difference is, although you have no choice when it comes to the draft or jury duty, you're still compensated for your work.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:49 PM
1

So this was you back then?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:46 PM
1

It's this kind of shit that makes me realize UKIP are pretty much the only UK party I would genuinely support. It's rather telling of a political system when the fringe is more attractive than the mainstream party.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:20 PM
1

Hate speech on some Ts. FTFY.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:02 PM
2

Here's the definition of rape according to Black's Law Dictionary (it's what every lawyer uses/should use): Black's Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009), rape RAPE rape, n. (15c) 1. At common law, unlawful sexual intercourse committed by a man with a woman not his wife through force and against her will. • The common-law crime of rape required at least a slight penetration of the penis into the vagina. Also at common law, a husband could not be convicted of raping his wife. — Formerly termed rapture; r…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:58 PM
1

Sounds like a good idea, but there are other things child support doesn't take into consideration either in its calculation or in its purpose. This includes things like school and health insurance. Why not include who pays for these as part of the child support package? In any way, this would still make sure the kid lives according to his parent's standard, while being a lot less blatant about income redistribution. Heaven knows a parent who pays for prep school wouldn't mind directly paying his…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:01 PM
1

Is it possible for you to write an affidavit and send it to the court forgiving his debt? Considering the child support is legally yours and not your mother's, it should be technically valid. Unfortunately, I have no idea of what the courts would do.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:48 AM
7

In most cases, they won't show anything to you. Before marriage, the ball's on your side of the court. After you get married is when she will actually take charge because the power has shifted. I would personally say from experience with this shit and with the law that you should just draft a cohabitation agreement and be sure to always wear a condom you bought the same day you're fucking and never removed from your wallet between the purchase and banging.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:57 AM
10

I feel the media has demonized masculinity more with its attacks on GZ rather than on TM. If you see the narrative, they constantly refuse to describe TM as a "young man" or a "young adult" or even as a teenager in many cases, they refer to him as a "child." God knows any 17-year old would get mad for being called a kid at that age. On the other hand, you have them refer to GZ as an adult who was fully in control of his actions. In that sense, it makes it evident that there are people out there …
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:29 PM
6

There's nothing wrong with being a social conservative. There's only a problem when you seek to apply social conservatism's norms in a field where such ideas are dissonant with the reality.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:01 PM
1

Only to kill babies and sodomize someone. Not to safeguard your phone calls, emails, and other communications from the government.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:30 PM
4

Aren't sodomy laws unconstitutional since Lawrence v. Texas?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:25 PM
1

It's a constitutional right in that one's right to privacy, derived from substantive due process, allows one to do so. Substantive due process is, for us constitutional literalists, something someone invokes when they can't find anything in the letter of the law to support their assertions. You know, even if you're pro-choice, you've got to understand how poorly written Roe v Wade is. Even Justice Ginsburg recognizes how poorly decided and badly-timed it was.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:30 AM
3

I simply can't stand feminists who equate restrictions on abortions with "patriarchy." For a lot of the pro-life crowd it's a moral issue of respecting the sanctity of life, there's nothing inherent in such thought on screwing over women. In fact, take into Account the situation of birthing children in rural China and you'd see there that abortion is actively being used on female fetuses. (The Chinese are limited to one child. Most farmers would rather have a boy who can help work the land and l…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:24 AM
4

As others have said, record everything. Oregon is a single-party consent state so you won't get into any trouble. Get anyone who's willing to vouch for you on the abuse to do affidavits. On the incoming girl, insist on a paternity test. If it turns out top be your kid, you can minimize child support by obtaining sole or partial custody. And on your step-daughter, you're not going anywhere with that. The courts are already hesitant to syrup a mother of her child, much less give him/her to someone…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:03 AM
3

Even if not blind, all that whipped cream and chocolate makes it hard to see past the ice cream.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:04 AM
1

In the U.S, we have Geittmann v. Geittmann, 126 Ill. App. 3d 470, 467 N.E.2d 297 (1984), as an example of such a practice. If you're in the U.K. there's Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited & Others [2013] UKSC 34.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:46 PM
0

They can easily give it the go-around by one party simply providing evidence that establishes the corporation's relevance to the case at hand. Then they bring it into the suit as a third or coparty.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:30 PM
1

It's actually possible under civil law. You establish a community whose members have control of the goods based on how much they paid/invested. However, 50-50 is presumed. Only problem with it is that any member of the community may petition for its dissolution.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:27 PM
13

Would you rather spend a couple of grand on one-time lawyers' consultation fees, or half your income for the rest of your life on an adulterer?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:04 AM
11

She already tipped her hand mentioning the divorce. Now all he should do is find all divorce attorneys in his area. Schedule a paid consultation with each of them. Now, when she shows up in court with her lawyer, all he has to do is show there's a conflict of interest. Also, in my state, no fault divorce does not necessarily mean you cannot divorce through other causes, one of them being adultery.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:13 PM
4

Mileena's not human though.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:32 PM
1

Even if paternity tests are undertaken. My state's courts say that in itself is not a 100% valid determinant of whether the child is his. In such cases, they look to other "factors" such as physical resemblance.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:26 AM
7

TLDR: You're paying the kid child support, not the mother. She merely administers the money in the kid's best interest. The child's legally entitled to child support, therefore, it cannot be revoked/removed/refunded, even though it might be the object of fraud or mismanagement. I think the easiest way to actually improve the reliability of child support is to have the administrator file regular expense reports with the court. If the court truly wants to safeguard the child's best interest, shoul…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:24 AM
-3

"Tax money not going towards abortions" is in many ways an utter hypocrisy. Quite simply, if you're funding certain abortion-sponsoring organizations, you're relieving them of some financial burden. This means that the money that they got from the government allows them to use the money they had previously relied on for that project can be put to use for other purposes, such as abortions.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:21 AM
1

Kinda confirms the stereotype that women love social games. Obviously both genders are, on average, going to like some things that the other won't. However, that still does not give us a license to criticize it for being different. The Sims isn't a terrible game per se. In fact, that they were able to exploit such a "niche" in gaming really speaks volumes to their ability to identify and retain a target audience. Now if we're speaking about the series' horrible DLC policy, it's a whole other iss…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:07 PM
4

I'm in law school at the moment, between people like this and how fucked up family law is, I'm never getting married. I understand this is only one person, and that all women aren't like this. However, the system's just so skewed at this time, taking the plunge isn't worth the risk.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:28 PM
8

Does this really matter that much in real life terms? 20 people from the 0.1% of the world is really not a significant number. Not to mention that these people live entirely secluded lives separated from the general populace.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:15 AM
2

Aside from the controversy, it's really slick marketing. Women are more predisposed towards eating salad, so why not put some sex into it? Not saying it's right of course.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:11 AM
1

This. In Puerto Rico, if the person simply cannot be found because he's either MIA or left the jurisdiction, you can ask the court for a service by publication. This means they just take out an ad in a paper (that targets the general populace and is mainstream) saying that X is suing Y. That would then be enough to commence legal proceedings. EDIT: It applies in all civil litigation.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:54 PM
1

In a thread with Space Marines, this is always mandatory: "There is no time to be lost! Battle Brothers! Space Marines, today the enemy is at our door! We know our duty and we will do it. We fight for our honor as Blood Ravens, as SPACE MARINES , and we fight in the name of the Emperor! And if we die this day we die in glory, we die heroes' deaths, but we shall not die, no! It is the enemy who will taste death and defeat! As you know! Most of our battle brothers are stationed in Space, Prepared …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:47 PM
4

This. Sometimes it takes much more strength and courage to acknowledge one's deficiencies and seek help in correcting them. In fact, the weak man is he who fakes strength and scoffs at a chance of self-improvement.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:20 AM
1

Oh, I came to that years ago. I guess it was when I realized that men are still forced to subsidize women's lifestyles that I realized true equality does not exist, and we still play by their rules. However, it's damn easy to simply live outside of the traditional system. Instead of showering a woman with gifts, I get to spend my money how I want: I go travelling every now and then, grab some beers with some friends, buy the odd impulse purchase or too. I have absolutely no desire to enter a rel…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:18 AM
1

I'd say for women it's less of a choice based on ambition and more on comfort for many. Let's think of it this way: women have been in our workforce for less than a century. In many ways, they're still trying to get used to a workplace that commonly demands that you put in 40+hours a week. Many are unable to cope with it and decide that they would do so only on a part-time basis, or have realized that taking Timmy to the doctor because he stuck something up his nose is much less stressful. Howev…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:04 AM
1

OP, you're being thrown a bone here. You'll be spending those 40 minutes in school anyway, why not use them productively? I would have loved to have study hall during normal school hours, because it'd mean I'd have had more time to do what I wanted after school. If you want to get the policy changed, merely reframe it, and say that girls aren't being given the same sort of attention boys are in doing their homework nor are being provided an environment conducive to doing so.Therefore they must s…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:54 AM
0

Although I am definitely for this man, this is not something for the men's rights board to discuss. Merely nitpicking every single situation weakens our own cause: aside from diluting our strength by targeting many issues, we should simply focus on two or three at a time. It also makes the movement seem rather prickly, the general public might be quick to see the movement as the kind of people that get mad over anything, much like feminazis.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:50 AM
4

Although it appears more women than men are on the team, it could very well be a common case of office politics. You simply don't get along well with them, because you're not hanging out around with them as often as other team members are. In many companies, you need to make sure you can get along well with everyone and make yourself seem useful at least. Not participating in social affairs, such as lunch like the others, will fuck you over. Another thing I'd like to add is go to HR before anyth…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:35 AM
1

Last I heard, headscarves are at the very least banned in public schools. However, you can wear them outside of it. In fact, there was a ruling this week annulling a woman's dismissal from her job for wearing a headscarf.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:22 AM
12

Best thing he could do right now is leave the country. Last I heard, Paraguay's damn easy to get into. All you need to do is open up a bank account with $5,000 and you get residency. Once you're down there, I imagine it's impossible to be tracked down unless you're a former Nazi being tracked by the Mossad.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:17 AM
1

The U.S. isn't all that bad. Two good examples are Louisiana and Puerto Rico. Since their family law is based on civil law, it's much more even-handed in application than most other states. Especially because it's civil law, judges cannot themselves deliver a ruling that contradicts the law. Also, the latter has a state constitutional provision forbidding any discrimination based on gender.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:30 PM
12

There's plenty of evidence to suggest that a child growing up without a father is at a disadvantage. http://www.photius.com/feminocracy/facts_on_fatherless_kids.html
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:08 PM
5

Sounds like a nice lady Anon. Now why not start paying her child support, since you had consensual contact with her through the internet that she did not consider rape? /s
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:05 PM
5

Unfortunately, "letting them" might not solve anything. If the current trends continue, we might very well end up with a society in which men are tied down for no reason, because the government needs to find some way to support these fatherless children. We're already seeing it happening in BC, and we previously saw it happen in Augustan Rome. What we must do is seriously rethink the current arrangement vis-a-vis traditional values, and find some sort of arrangement that takes the positives from…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:56 PM
2

I was raised in a traditional household: my dad worked, and my mom was a housewife. Seeing this gender dynamic play out, I'm inclined to say that my father was more important to my life than my mother. For some reason, my mother became an alcoholic, while my father, my siblings and I were forced to deal with her. Shit got so bad that my mom was chugging whiskey to the point where she would lose control of her bowels. A neurologist we took her to told us she'd drunk herself to permanent brain dam…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:52 PM
1

Normally, the granting or recognition of rights also carries with it certain responsibilities that must be observed. By refusing the former, one's also protected from being tied to the latter. One of the best examples of this is female anti-suffragettes. They feared being granted the right to vote, because it would also signal their eligibility for the draft (and it damn well should have). Another, much more general instance of this is the never-ending argument between freedom and security: abso…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:55 AM
5

Political Correctness. Although it might not be a "good reason" in and of itself.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:42 AM
-1

There's one rule you should simply try and follow: treat men like gentlemen and women like ladies. The basic tenet of MRAs is to simply restore respect to society. Unfortunately, there are people out there that decided there are some out there that are not deserving of respect, because of a victim complex. Just do what you can to make sure their behavior doesn't affect you, nor those close to you.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:07 AM
3

The biggest problem is how they repeatedly forget basic market principles in quashing prostitution. If you really want to stamp any unseemly business, you don't go for the buyers, you go for the sellers. The buyers have a numerical advantage over sellers, not to mention that by going after sellers, the supply drops. Consequently, prices increase, and buyers would begin to stop buying, because it's getting too expensive.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 07:36 AM
5

It's also a nice, warm, comfy place bears curl up and sleep in when the outside is cold and fucked up.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:40 AM
6

I never gave a damn about the word. In fact, back in college, I had some friends who set themselves up in a really nice suite. The common room had a nice big LCD+speaker setup, along with a bunch of couches and a PS3, 360, and Wii. It was pretty much all guys there all the time and hence, among my social circle of about 50 people or so, that was THE mancave. Great place to hang out at, and just relax and have fun without any sort of the pressure that comes when a gathering turns into a mixed gen…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:39 AM
18

No you have not. OP posted this 2 months ago; it's on her profile as of 5:29AM GMT 2013-03-30: [–]collegesugarbaby 4 points 2 months ago At the risk of being completely torn apart in this thread, I'm one of these college sugar babies (not from that state, though). I don't know what to say other than I do it because I like older men, I like sex, and I like the stability that the "allowance" gives me. *Note that I barely made this account because I lurk this subreddit and I didn't want to use my o…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:29 AM
8

Posted the same thing on r/gaming. http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/1b74la/rpg_boot_camp_for_9year_old_kickstarter_mom/
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter