TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ValiantPie Archive

View 0 posts and 227 comments by ValiantPie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Women generally take longer to go to the bathroom. Thus, a queue is more likely to build up there with an influx of women than at the men's with an influx of men. If they didn't do this, the line would go several blocks past the main entrance. This is a bad post and you should feel bad.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:12 AM
6

I really don't think that sisterofblackvisions is associated with SRS. Even if they are, they are being denounced to hell and back by them. The best course of action for everybody would be for everybody to agree that what they did was horrible and go back to our regularly scheduled programming, so to speak.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:53 PM
6

Don't harass people in real life over stupid internet shit. The reason doxxing is banned on reddit is because of exactly what you say you are going to do. Seriously, don't pull this shit, you idiot.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:13 PM
13

Who in the hell upvoted the puerile crap? Seriously, those who did ought to feel stupid.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:00 AM
3

Let's just go with both being bad, alright?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:55 AM
2

So, how do you know about Chris Chan? Wasting time on the internet, mayhaps?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:22 AM
-1

With that sort of mindset, you really can't criticize SRS when they display the same attitude, can you?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:29 PM
2

Really?...
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:27 PM
3

This isn't some sort of war.. If it is, it's only fought due to relentless stupidity on both sides. Any "victories" in this war would surely be phyrric in mature. Your attitude is foolish and self-destructive.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:41 AM
1

I'm sorry, but I can't allow myself to read the Spearhead. Of all the sites that got called out by the SPLC, this is the one that really deserved it.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:33 AM
3

Why does it matter, though? If we have enough resources to stop one, and I certainly hope that we can stop the other. This is you playing sexism as a zero sum game. Even if you win the oppression Olympics in this regard, it's still not worth competing so enthusiastically.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:29 AM
3

your little echo chamber here. I try to think of a metaphor grand enough to describe the delicious irony of some of the stuff you guys have the gall to say, I but I really can't.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:23 AM
2

Uh, and nobody was actually classified a hate group. Really, the most that was said was "Omg Amanda Marcotte thinks r/mr is misogynist (like everything else on the planet.)" I'm just glad that, as stupid as this place can get sometimes, it will never be primarily responsible for destroying an LGBT community. :P
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:20 AM
5

I upvoted it because I thought it was an interesting topic and relevant. Now I'm from SRS. Wut.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:10 PM
12

Care about women? Man hater. Care about men? Woman hater. I just don't get how more people don't see the parallels between MR and Feminism. These potential allies, however, do everything to hinder each other's progress.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:05 PM
0

Why can't it be both?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 07:53 PM
16

I could say this is "what it's like talking about" any political ideology and it's supporters would eat it up.. This is what the vast majority of outspoken people think of themselves. I mean, hell, the religious right manages to pull this one off somehow. So yeah, all this is is high purity circlejerconium.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:40 AM
1

One isn't trying to turn back the clock on women's reproductive rights. Bill Maher can be a bit of an aashole, but one of a more innocuous disposition compared to the oozing pus-filled rancid prolapsed asshole that is Rush Limbaugh.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:35 AM
3

On one hand, this is a gendered insult on a gender-focused forum. On this other hand, and this is Nancy Grace we're talking about. Hm. Conclusion: Don't imply that Nancy Grace is nearly as warm, enjoyable, and awesome as any erogenous zone.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:30 AM
1

Good. That means we can have two groups outraged at this bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:25 AM
4

Question marks do not work that way.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:09 PM
13

Please refrain from being a homophobe and transphobe. Not only will this make us look bad, but will also obviously perpetuate homophobic and transphobic attitudes, which is very bad in itself.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:06 PM
23

Whatever.. SRS has done far more damage to feminism than they have to this place.. If you guys would chill out a little bit and actually talk about things relevant to MR, your time would be much more well spent.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:57 PM
-1

Yaaaaawn. Try harder next time.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:52 PM
2

According to reputable and level headed people, such as Amanda Marcotte (You know, the person who flips her shit everyone the words, "nice" and "guy" in the same sentence, and who sided with Nancy Grace during the Duke LaCrosse case.) .
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:28 AM
2

I think that I can provide a translation: herp derp, derp derp de-derp derp, derp. Hope this helps.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:16 AM
1

I do. Nobody cares.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:16 PM
2

I'm not saying their representative, though they are quite vocal. They do more than enough to make potential allies uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 09:26 PM
-6

You just compared Warren Farrell to Valerie Solanas. Wut.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:46 AM
0

Yeah, look at those neologisms. They must be beardhurt.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:38 AM
1

Nah, I just think they're kind of silly and have way too much time on their hands. You worry too much.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:36 AM
3

They were always at war with Laurelai. Just like Eastasia.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:35 AM
-1

You also believe that 19 = 22. Needless to say, I take what you say with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:33 AM
-5

Oh, the "well then how about you do it better" argument. I don't need to be a cook to tell you that your food tastes horrible. People and organizations that have done more for men than you have: Warren Farrell, Glenn Sacks, suicide hotliners, Planned Parenthood, Innocence Project, anti-bullying activists, LGBT groups, Kurt Vonnegut and other humanists, anti-war activists, The Civil Rights movement, etc, etc. If I wanted to, I could make a really big list.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:30 AM
32

You do realize that he is implying that he is killing himself, right?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:12 AM
75

MR is hardly worth killing yourself over. Please don't. If you need to, post to /r/SuicideWatch. Just please, don't kill yourself.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:11 AM
3

Actually, I had the same misconception about them when first introduced to them. They're actually up there with NPR, as surprising as that is.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:08 AM
-9

Yes. I'm also InfinitelyThirsting's alt, too. and an evil monocled dragon which eats children and kittens. and bigfoot.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:07 AM
21

Things are more complicated than you think they are. The simple model of the world you hold in your mind belies its distorted nature. I can say this of quite a few MRAs; I can say this of you.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:02 AM
-6

You spend way too much time worrying about feminists and not nearly enough caring about mens' issues. You generalize women and make hostile comments about them. You make silly posts titled "Does Feminism Cause Brain Damage?" You divert attention away from the real, meaty issues, and assume a lot of misandry that's been a part of numerous human cultures for almost as long as they have existed are a product of Feminism. Yes, there are quite a few people out for gender equality yet have thrown us u…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:58 AM
3

There's also Zaferk.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:44 AM
31

0.2/10 Be more original, and try harder next time.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:43 AM
-14

Hate to say it, Elam, but you really aren't the person best suited to respond to this. There is a reason that I avoid your links.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:40 AM
3

So the things you say are jokes like on top gear. Good to know.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:38 AM
6

Thanks for still being here. We need people like you if we are to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:35 AM
2

If only I could believe that half of the upvotes that this has are in good faith... Regardless, you are absolutely right. Still, I am concerned that the SPLC might be doing this partly out of petty identity politics.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:34 AM
11

Oh, hahhahahaha. I see. Hi, SRS!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:01 AM
3

You are one of the few people I would wish an STD upon, so good.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:32 AM
2

Push for more options for men, not less for women. I mean, seriously, is this hard? Not only are you throwing women under the bus with that mentality, but you are also shooting men in the foot in the long run. I mean, what happens when some form of male birth control hits the market? The only way for everybody to be able to choose whether they have a child or not is for everybody to have multiple viable birth control options. This is the only way to make things work well for everybody. Don't pro…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:30 AM
5

Well, you can get those for free. If you are worried about her "forgetting," use a condom. If the condom isn't enough, push for more birth control options for men. If you side with the religious right, everybody loses.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 08:24 AM
1

Jeremiah, is that you?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:09 PM
1

yawn.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:09 AM
2

hai guys, what's goin on here?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:06 AM
4

You do realize that the original post was edited, and was most likely a troll, right?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:17 AM
1

I know, right? And here, I thought it might be somebody with an ounce of credibility.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:14 AM
15

I wish.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:10 AM
3

You do realize that the difference you have laid out in front of us stems entirely from your own perspective, right? You essentially took the same thing and viewed it from different angles for each case. I think you may be enforcing a textbook double standard.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:34 PM
1

Yeah, the replies that you have gotten in the main thread have answered your question well enough. This person is not your father. End of story.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:16 PM
7

Thank you for providing us another example of gender roles being used against men, but that isn't the one people are talking about right now. Perhaps that would be a good discussion for later, though!
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:10 PM
2

Why do you insist on playing oppression olympics? Is it that hard to just say that everybody is fucked over by gender roles? Also, there is the fact that this ties into the more general idea of male disposability. If you want to see young men being pulled into a viscious pointless cycle of violence and death, you need only to look at the plight of those involved in gang violence. And yes, most of those men and boys are minorities, which is why more people here need to examine intersectionality.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:52 PM
3

Don't bother with him; It's like bashing your head into a brick wall. Of course, since I posted here, he's going to think that you are another one of InfinitelyThirsting's alts.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:36 AM
2

Does it surprise you that much that there is more than one person who thinks that you are a moron? You seriously think that somebody would cultivate an account with a vastly different set of interests for the sole purpose of screwing with you? :|
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:37 AM
3

You call everybody a troll. Why should I give a shit?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:16 AM
3

To be fair, a lot of feminists eviscerated this article, pointing out the irony in trying to minimize prison rape numbers. Aerik is pretty much a laughingstock in every community that he is a part of, now.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:56 PM
2

If you think that IT is anti-male, all I can say is that you have a very severe case of tunnel vision.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:30 PM
1

That would be nice. We need a larger amount of moderates around here.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:27 PM
1

Thank you for making it so that I did not have to give them a pageview. This is the biggest pile of stupid that I have read in a while, though. There is no coherent argument save for a bunch of scare quotes. If they actually cared (and weren't batshit crazy misogynists) they would be advocating for services that catered to mens' healthcare needs. I mean, come on...
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:23 PM
5

Planned Parenthood is essential for anybody not interested in entering a new Victorian age. Cuts in PP's funding will only serve to screw everybody over, save for the types of people obsessed with purity rings. But yeah, InfinitelyThirsting, thank you for being the voice of sanity.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 09:19 PM
7

As somebody who has been down that road, I have to say that you framed your statement in the worst way possible. I would look at it as: "men are told by society at large that if they approach something like depression with anything other than absolute stoicism, that they are pathetic whiny little boys. Naturally they don't say a peep up to the moment they lose control of the centrifugal death spiral of negative emotions inside of themselves, at which point they hit rock bottom and often try to k…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 03:12 AM
0

It's a response to r/BeatingWomen and the rest of the subreddits it spawned. If you actually look through the links, it isn't really that offensive, and actually pretty weaksauce.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:14 AM
-1

Also, you seem to define anybody who disagrees in the slightest with you as an MRA, so yeah.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 04:03 AM
-3

Wow, an SRS member talking about introspection? Heh, that's kind of funny in a very sad, derpy way. The whole Laurelai thing has cemented you guys as a bunch of self-destructive idiots.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 03:59 AM
5

Oh look, what a special snowflake. Never mind that lower life expectancy, the heightened likelihood of being the victim of a violent crime (especially if gay or a racial minority), the spike in suicide risk, the even greater lack of support if you find yourself with PTSD, depression, or any other mental disorder, etc, etc, etc. Yes men have privilege, but it isn't the monopoly you think it is.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:47 AM
7

NO. WE ARE NOT DOING THIS AGAIN.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:30 AM
1

Wow, you didn't even try to make sense there, did you?
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:27 AM
3

Wow, the comments over there are really funny. "OMG THEY ALWAYS DROWN OUT OUR OPINIONS GAIZ" [+40] I mean, seriously, they equate having a voice to drowning out theirs. And then the same set of people are most of the ones that say "OMG HOW DAR U STAND FOR EQUALITY ND NOT CALL YOURSELF FEMINIST HRBLGRBLRAAH" Sorry, but if you need to exclude certain issues, you are not all encompassing. *Really, all you need to do is LOL and move on. No need to reciprocate the histrionics going on over there.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:48 PM
2

You are an dick head and I hate you, and before you whine about gendered insults, you deserve to be offended.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:39 PM
3

Poe's law applies, especially after Laurelai's anti-Semitic meltdown.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:36 PM
-2

Oh god it seems that we are rapidly approaching level Dworkin. How is it not possible for somebody to consent without wanting to do so? Let's say person A is in a relationship with person B. Person A has a massive guilt complex that has nothing to do with the coercion of person B (cheating comes to mind.) Due to A's hangup, they sleep with person B in spite of their recent (or not so recently, if we want to be really pessimistic) dissatisfaction with B. Is that rape on B's part? If it is, then o…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 07:34 PM
2

Oh god you just did that unironically. Wow.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:24 AM
8

You see, when you see everyone here as literally hitler, your argument loses its gravity. None of us really give a shit about what you think.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:08 AM
2

That was a rather unfortunate typo.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:12 AM
6

See, I like to apply innocent until proven guilty to both parties. Just as I would*n't point to somebody and yell rapist, I wouldn't point to somebody (who has in all likelihood experienced some serious trauma, no less) and yell liar. I don't give a fuck if anybody finds it contradictory. *Oh fuck did I screw up the initial post.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 03:22 AM
21

Yeah, this whole debacle was very, very stupid. When people are telling you that they've been raped on the internet, don't make an argument about it. Is trying to make a point really worth the chance of excaberating somebody's past trauma? How would you feel if somebody was talking about how you were not raped to you. At the very least you could have tried being the teensiest be respectful.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 03:14 AM
-1

That would be fine and dandy if people actually fucking read what she was saying, and maybe held off on clicking the pretty blue arrows. I mean, seriously you guys.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 10:51 PM
6

Even the ones where she clarifies her statements and makes some very good points. Those were downvoted, too. Seriously.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 10:48 PM
1

People have been (and to a large extent are) ignorant to sexism against women, after a century of feminism. Does it surprise you to see parallels?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 09:49 AM
2

You guys care way too much about them. They self destruct so often that they (along with Rebecca Watson, the non-celebrity) are the only ones who can look at themselves without cringing at the sheer stupidity of it all.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 09:45 AM
3

It doesn't make feminism a bad thing though. In fact, the reason it has been able to make things better for women is that it focuses on one sex. Still, when you insist to use only a hammer for both screws and nails, things start to fall apart.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:47 AM
0

Their are a lot of people who have lost their genitals in a variety of ways. Usually, the worst part is the social stigma, more than anything.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:34 AM
0

Though I do have to say, this is a women's problem. Something like this happens to a handful of boys, but you could easily fill several stadiums to the amount of girls it happens to. Hyping this up is like complaining about a paper cut in front of somebody who just lost their arm. Kind of the Hillary Clinton quote, but in reverse. Don't be hypocrites, guys.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:33 AM
3

You kind of jumped from Hey, this is really more of a women's problem. to lol misandree dusent exist! You have mistaken B=>A with B<=>A. You need to brush up on propositional logic.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:25 AM
3

I'm of the opinion that the people who are most likely to use such a pithy, snarky, and lazy phrase are the very same group of people least likely to use it right.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:07 AM
2

How the fuck can you"mansplain" when you are talking about men's experiences on a board for men? I think you are stretching your terminology a bit.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:05 AM
3

You know, you aren't hurting us as much as you are hurting saner feminists.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 06:55 AM
0

I really don't think that that is the case. While men are certainly seen as being more capable in many areas, they are also seen as being much more disposable, having less intrinsic battle. If the former attitude was the prevailing reason toward the gendered nature of the draft, our shortsighted leaders would be reluctant to send so many capable people to their doom in Vietnam among other wars. In a lot of situations, men are regarded as little more than bags of meat (especially by other men, I'…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 06:54 AM
8

You embody the reason that people avoid this subreddit. You might even be a troll. If so, congrats, because you are a pretty damn good one. For some reason, though, I think that you are merely a complete assclown.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 08:34 AM
3

You know that thing where someone will call you a manhater when you expressed no contempt for men whatsoever? You just did that thing.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:59 PM
4

This is the feminism that I agree with wholeheartedly. And I think that this feminism is a lot more prevalent than a lot of the people here think. However, a gynocentric approach is adapted to uprooting misogyny, not misandry, and even if the whole of feminism was like this there would be a need for a male-centric approach to gender to accompany it. It's like trying to emulate Monet with only one color. However, Feminism is Not a Monolith, so it is disingenuous to deny the existence of Amanda Ma…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:45 PM
1

Jezebel is the place of an unprincipled, self serving type of feminism, that believes in social justice only as far as it will serve the girls who browse the site. I would take SRS over Jezebel any day. At least SRS has a concept of justice to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:32 PM
4

For two sentences, your post a crapload of things that are wrong with it. I don't even know where to start, but I guess I should try. You're an SRSer, so you have dedicated a lot of your time to combating the horrible assumptions a lot on men have of a lot of women. Sexism, right? So when these behaviors are mirrored, you try to handwave that, and I don't really understand. An empathy problem on your part, perhaps? I guess I don't see sexism as being that cut and dry. I mean, compared to cissexi…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:26 PM
-1

To be fair, Roman Polanski happened. Still, this is pretty egregious.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 07:24 AM
2

Oh god you even used the stupid (tm). gb2Jezebel.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 03:18 AM
1

I would describe it as having a holier-than-thou texture and the flavor of butthurt, trying to mask itself with the cloying aroma of trying-too-hard trolling. Don't worry too much about them. Most of their victories are outweighed by their knack at self destructing and making themselves look like idiots on a regular basis.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:03 AM
0

I think the denial of male privilege is disingenious. A lot of it makes sense. It's the insistence on dual privileges that seems to create a better paradigm, in my eyes.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:56 AM
3

Try better banana jokes. All the ones you posted have fallen flat. Monty Python is funny, but that's practically cheating.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:40 AM
1

If you haven't looked through onetimer's post history, do so. He apparently trolls on multiple fronts, and that takes dedication, so appreciate him, and be sure to give him his downvotes.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 07:33 AM
-1

Saying please is persuasion. Oral sex goes way, way beyond that. The oral does not come until after she says yes. How is that part not clear cut? Even if you do persuade somebody who is having reservations about the act, you better be very goddam sure that they are comfortable. Why doesn't everybody use safe words?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:50 PM
1

Empathy, how does it work? This is the kind of attitude that hurts female rape victims, but the male victims of rape, too. I mean, who in the fuck are you to decide whether men are always comfortable with sex or not. Just because you are in a constant state of consent doesn't mean all men are.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:41 PM
1

She was uncomfortable and wasn't able to react. Can't you see how somebody might freeze up in such an extremely uncomfortable situation?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 10:11 AM
13

Holy fucking shit now this is an overreaction. You have emotional issues that you really need to solve if you are riled up this badly. I mean this. Talk to a counselor or somebody. You have things you need to work through. Unless you're a troll. I'm really hoping this is a troll post. Otherwise, you have me feeling sorry for HPLovecraft. I mean, if somebody posted something like this about me, I would actually be a bit scared.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 10:06 AM
0

No, this was pretty obviously rape. He didn't sweet talk her into sex. He fucking went down on her while she was still at no. I think that is pretty clear cut. What the fuck, people.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:49 AM
5

Hey, MRA here. Sorry for the transphobic assholes on r/mr. I don't agree with you guys sometimes, but I still think you guys are awesome.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:36 AM
3

Really, I don't have much of a beef with them in terms of their fighting of racism, homophobia, and transphobia, aside from the mix of idiocy and self righteousness they use to confront it, along with the fact that they oftentimes miss the mark on reading comprehension. I mean, being straight white or cis really doesn't have a role or disadvantage assigned to it. In that manner, people don't have roles or expectations assigned to it, does it? You can argue otherwise, but if you do, I can't help …
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:46 AM
4

I was with you up until the homophobia. Please don't do that.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:07 AM
1

Eh, more herp derping from a group of people trying to simulate a degenerative brain disease on a community-wide level. It really distracts this board, which already has a bad habit of fixating on trivial shit, from more substantive issues. If people are so eager to make themselves look like idiots, please allow them to do so.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:54 AM
5

I find it offensive that you didn't bother to use two more characters to type out "you". Stop that.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 01:41 PM
3

Example number 476,792 of confirmation bias backing up sexist assumptions. Gender roles flex their muscles not through thought, but the lack thereof.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 01:41 PM
30

I always thought that this whole "bigot" thing on register-her was pretty silly in itself. I think it undermines the entire enterprise, turning it into a laughingstock. Something like this was an eventuality, in my opinion. There is a line between being offended and trying way too hard to be offended. EDIT: You guys are getting outraged over that? It was a fucking joke. It wasn't even a shitty joke, for god's sake. Every one of you raging over this has revoked the privilege of calling feminists …
/r/MensRights05/12/11 01:36 PM
3

A lot of people here have a point, but I think a lot of it is a bit more complicated than that. Many people on both sides don't like the other, yet are still very egalitarian. I would say that the fringe on both sides control dialouge to a point where it cleaves the moderate, more egalitarian group covering both camps in half. Also, the internet is partially to blame, leading to less discussion and more drama. This deserves a much longer post, but I'm tired and strapped for time, so yeah. Just r…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:49 PM
1

Thank you. It's nice to see a little bit of sanity regarding the SCUM nonsense. Yes, they are idiots for making that play. However, I think all the violent rhetoric and register-her crap is the exact wrong way to handle all of this. Not only could it cause a magnificent shitstorm, but these women hardly deserve vaguely violent calls to action directly against them. To everyone who would harass people in the name of MR: please stop existing.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:43 PM
9

Your post history made me throw up in my mouth a little bit. Please stop existing.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 04:42 AM
1

I just think that /r/Fitness would be better equipped to answer the question directly, given that they most likely have a larger pool of knowledge on how gyms are run.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 04:47 AM
-2

This isn't really relevant to /r/MensRights. I would say that /r/Fitness would be able to give you an actual course of action. Your predicament does raise an interesting point, though. I believe that a lot of people tend to ignore the fact that men can be sexually harassed, and that men need sexual boundaries, too. Mention that you feel uncomfortable and vulnerable in a situation, especially around assholes, and you risk being subject to mockery. Thus, men find it slightly less painful to walk a…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 04:24 AM
0

Stereotypes are a very very wonderful way to make people buy shit. TV is a medium bolstered by both advertisment, and a lowest common denominator which primarily relies on consumerism. TV assumes that you don't have a brain, and you need a brain to process a decent, nuanced self concept. Thus, all we are left with are idiotic, helpless stereotypes in the place of actual people. Most popular media has no interest in convincing you that you are a fully fleshed out person; you are, after all, more …
/r/MensRights16/11/11 04:04 AM
22

The thing is, a lot of the things that we call misandry also cover a range of things just as wide, and yet, we use that term all the time. I just think that we should refrain from culturing a double standard. Misogyny and misandry happen. Sometimes, it happening doesn't imply hatred of a gender, but instead, sexism.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:07 AM
9

Can you agree that, even if it is "just sexist," it's still hurtful. You know, the ironic thing is that we called people being sexist "sexism" more than misogyny/misandry, we would all get our points across better. That way, "you need to stop being sexist, because you are putting people off" isn't construed as "OMG you hate [insert gender here]." Hell, I don't know. It's all semantics, and language is fickle, and I should not be posting whilst this sleep deprived.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:04 AM
1

I do agree that a lot of people here just kind of sweep it under the rug. Though I think we have an interesting perspective on misogyny, I think that a primarily female-oriented space would be better at fighting it. We're better at fighting misandry. Since misandry would be more plentiful in a more feminist space and misogyny in an MRA space... well, that where you get all the animosity. If we want to start fighting either one in a constructive way, though, we really have to fight both, don't we…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:50 AM
1

Oh fuck the gender related subreddits have become 4chan.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:12 AM
7

Wow, did you just defend and condemn societal discrimination is the same breath? Do you simply refuse to listen to the problems of others when they do not directly harm you? Please stop. You are making my brain hurt.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:45 AM
4

Thank you for saying that. There are certain people here that very desperately need to take notes on some of the things you are saying.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:39 AM
2

It's my subjective experience talking here, and I apologize if I am being judgmental, but that group of people sounds like assholes. I can almost smell the Axe drifting off of your descriptions of these guys. I mean, I talk about sex with my friends, but the company is a lot more mixed, both in terms of gender and of variety of experience, which leads to interesting conversations. Still, that is a very fair point. Guys really really care about sex. It's an interesting question: Testosterone? Obj…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:37 AM
1

This is a good chart. A lot of the terminology used by LGBT groups makes more sense to me now. I love how a simple graphic can clarify so many points.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:02 AM
3

No, I honestly think you deserve the downvotes you got. You were being disrespectful.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:56 AM
2

Apparently, this is why
/r/MensRights02/11/11 04:15 AM
8

I sometimes agree with you. Now is not one of those times. This is, however, one of those times when you should shut up and keep your personal politics out of this shit. Choose your fucking battles, man.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 03:10 AM
13

This isn't really relevant, but I don't really fucking care at this point. This should be posted on every fucking subreddit. Except /r/beatingwomen, because that would be even more fucked up than the existence of /r/beatingwomen.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 03:08 AM
3

Well, at least we, in our infinite generosity, give you a board to whine on.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:55 AM
6

You being an asshole and making generalizations isn't really helping much.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:54 AM
9

Please don't feel responsible for the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others based solely on your gender. Anybody who does that has to own up to some pretty horrific shit.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 10:13 PM
0

Oh yes, the classic "LOL I TROLL U" response. The front that you present to us belies the fact that you overflow with self-righteous indignation.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 08:29 PM
1

Reading your comment history, I have to say that I am impressed. You are an equal opportunity troll, somebody who is solely dedicated to lulz. You are a rare breed.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 06:08 PM
12

Wait, you're complaining about upvotes/downvotes being fuzzed, and you are coming from SRS. Your lack of a sense of irony would be hilarious were it not so absolutely depressing.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 06:03 PM
1

Man, I read through your comment history, and it seems as if your mind consists of nothing but the most idiotic opinion possible for any given situation. Complete Paultard? Check. Austrian theory of economics? Check. Black people inferior to white people? Check. I mean, for fuck's sake man, why do you exist?
/r/MensRights21/10/11 08:19 PM
3

Yes, now there is clarity in your post's stupidity.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:20 AM
0

Rethink the wording of this post. I don't think you wrote what you meant to write.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:08 AM
1

I do have to agree with SpecialKRJ. Still, as long as the cultural myth that men cannot be raped via envelopment persists, even the most patently silly way a law could be used to create a double standard still grievously damages the purpose for this revision of definitions. The thing that is the most damaging, in this case, is the myth itself, for without it, none of this would be a problem.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:06 AM
1

Well, if I ever want to strawman feminism, you are the example I promise to use! Also, I would like to see which comments you hate, given your history of rational, even tempered judgement.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 12:57 AM
2

If you are caught doing that without her consent, lets just say that a rape charge would only marginally affect your sentence. Where in the fuck did you get that hypothetical, anyway?
/r/MensRights21/10/11 12:51 AM
1

Given the way you cherrypick, I think it is quite obvious that you aren't going to take us seriously anyway. If you want to live in your little fantasy world where he is representative of us, be my guest.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 12:46 AM
1

Oh god, it's like you came straight from the 1950's! How quaint!
/r/MensRights19/10/11 07:48 AM
2

That's kind of misogynist right there, you know.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 07:47 AM
6

Wait, are you of all people, accusing others of participating in a circlejerk? You make me smile, every once in a while. You're precious.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 03:52 AM
1

Both of you. Go be butthurt somewhere else.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:07 AM
2

This is shit that only increases the amount of drama among all of these subreddits and websites. Stop it. Unless, of course, you troll only to cause discord and lulz. In that case, carry on: I cannot stop you.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:02 AM
3

Isn't it possible to feel bad for all parties involved? My sympathy is not so easily revoked. Also, weren't you the asshole who was getting all worked up over the fact that that douchebag who torched the car in Vancouver didn't deserve any sort of punishment? Wouldn't he have something coming himself? Why does he suddenly get to be protected from the consequences of his violent actions. What the fuck, AnnArchist?
/r/MensRights18/10/11 06:58 AM
2

Just because self defense is justified doesn't mean that they deserve it. Isn't the basis of our justice system the attempted elimination of cruel and unusual punishment?
/r/MensRights18/10/11 06:54 AM
1

I think you underestimate the power of the lowly metal rod. Hell, a police officer's truncheon is more than enough to inflict excessive damage on someone's person.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 06:52 AM
1

I would argue that a woman would be much less likely to do this as a man. You probably want to downvote me at this point. Please, keep reading. If I recall correctly, this man was placed into the prison system at one point. In that kind of environment, disproportionate violence is the only rational response towards any perceived threat. Prison is a feral society where one has to shut off his senses of humanity, kindness, and civility if he wants to survive. Thus, individuals serve their senses, …
/r/MensRights18/10/11 06:49 AM
2

I just think that, when all is said and done, you really need to really look at the way you view race. Is the fact that it alienates people a confirmation of it, or rather, the direct result of it? All I ask you to do is to remember the post reconstruction era. In that period, we see proof that poor white people can band together with poor black people, and lead to something like the populist movement. It took the direct intervention of the Dixiecrats to create the Jim Crow era. All I'm saying i…
/r/MensRights18/10/11 06:24 AM
4

Doesn't that only apply when they say something with something you disagree with? Does this make the racist opinions of Uncle Toms more credible, somehow. You can't say that you did not try to invalidate his opinion when you used a shitty canned response to a well thought out, if misguided, opinion. Privilege, as a concept, started out as a call for mutual understanding, and you are using it as an othering tactic. You are moving identity politics into the realm of self-parody.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:52 AM
3

But the way he uses the term and the way you use it are much different. Say that you bludgeon somebody over the head, and your defense is, "but this isn't some sort of weapon. It's a priceless antique!" What you are using a sociological term to bully people and invalidate their experiences. Though I don't agree with him, the bullshit you are pulling is the reason he isn't liberal today. So congrats, for hurting both your cause and mine!
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:34 AM
1

Well, you aren't being misandrist if you are just as anti-choice for women. In that case, you would only be a regular old fuckhead.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:14 AM
4

Which is why men are more likely to be homeless than women, correct?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:07 AM
4

White privilege could really only be compared to male privilege if, somehow, black people lived 7 years longer, were six times less likely to commit suicide, were less likely to be the victim of violent crime, and got lesser sentences for equivalent crimes. Is that the case. Actually, let me answer that for you: no, that is not the case. To argue for universal male privilege is to implicitly deny the existence of another.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:06 AM
-1

Fucking Sankaku Complex? Really?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:09 PM
3

I'm sorry, but if somebody goes on a shooting spree over anything short of an Eldritch abomination or zombies, they are a horrible person, and also an asshole.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 11:21 PM
-3

God, do you try too hard. Dumb site, though.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:10 PM
1

tu quoque, huh?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:32 AM
7

No, you do not get to play victim when you are being a sexist prick. I'm sorry, you make 13-year-olds on xbox live look eloquent and considerate by comparison. You think that you are on some grandiose and righteous crusade, but in reality, you just sound like you had a bit too much to drink before getting on the internet. Nobody is telling you to shut up; they are telling you that you look like a complete idiot.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:28 AM
7

God, didn't you pull this a few weeks ago? Given the way you've gone about it, this is little more than a temper tantrum on your end. Calm down. Also, stop being an asshole.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:00 AM
1

Hmm, I wonder if this was crossposted...
/r/MensRights06/10/11 05:23 PM
1

I agree. It's just that we are doing even less to protect men from violence that is the problem.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 06:24 PM
3

As long as it applies to everyone? No, not really. Sadly, this doesn't happen in practice.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 06:22 PM
3

Dude, really. I feel like you primarily exist to give certain subreddits fodder, Demonspawn...
/r/MensRights04/10/11 06:18 PM
2

Are you shaming people for their facial hair? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:16 AM
8

Wait, are you presenting this as a bad thing?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:14 AM
10

Your obsessive hatred of us isn't really helping your case...
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:12 AM
0

We do not believe in censorship due to idiotic opinions. Not even for you, even.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 03:18 AM
2

Holy shit. Do you have any idea of what you have just done? This is the last link in a looped chain of downvote squads... the circle has been completed desolation awaits us all
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:32 PM
14

Wow, lets see what we can unpack here: misandry (freebie), victim invisibility, conspiracy theories, perfection of the female sex, gender essentialism, a complete misunderstanding of the nature of gender roles, label overload, grandiose of class conflict, victim blaming combined with a healthy dose of just-world theory, and to top it all off, a preemptive dismissal of the criticism of any of these things. God, that was gold. The schadenfreude I feel when bigots shoot themselves in the foot is pa…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:23 PM
2

Thank you. You are a bastion of sanity.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:54 PM
-2

No. Society does not discriminate against you for being white or straight. Have you ever seen some of the shit black men go through? You know the whole Schrodinger's Rapist thing, I presume. Imagine people thinking of you in that manner all the time, and you almost begin to get an inkling of what they go through. You are a brute, a good for nothing, just because some people don't like your skin, your clothes, the way you speak, and so on. And yeah, you might be policed for masculinity, via bully…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:51 PM
1

It's hard not to be far left compared to traditionalist assholes.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:03 PM
3

Or, you know, some of us are passionate about multiple issues and actually welcome this.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:02 PM
0

I like the pro-LGBT part, but I don't see how this naturally leads to the lauding of Amanda Marcotte. Also, you are kind of crazy, so there's that, too.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:01 PM
-1

Let me guess. It's actually our male-controlled society that has brainwashed them, or some shit. Do you really think that any of us here think that you post in good faith? Please, we're not as dumb as you obviously think.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:03 AM
2

It isnt the fault of either gender. It's the fact that society still has a ton of fucked up notions about gender.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:00 AM
2

Sorry that I exist, I guess.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:58 AM
5

No, no, no. First, he's anti abortion, and second, he smacks of Ayn Rand. I don't like anybody who hates people who don't fit into their narrow vision of reality, and that includes libertarians and traditionalist. You've got to accept the fact that we are a politically diverse group.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:57 AM
1

This is the argumentative equivalent of trying to stuff yourself with straw...
/r/MensRights29/09/11 11:27 PM
2

I think that it comes close enough to lack of consent that it would be rape. Still, that is semantics. Getting someone pregnant or giving them an STD is very clearly a violation of sexual well being, and I would say clearly and unambiguously falls in the realm of sexual assault. I hope that law enforcement would investigate this as they would any other crime involving a victim, and most importantly, I hope the woman has access to the same resources any other sexual assault victim would have in o…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 08:45 PM
2

Not really. I have seen better, more subtle trolls. This one has the freshness and vivacity of a rotting carcass.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 08:18 AM
6

Anyone who plays the game "which rape victims are more important" really ought to take a good look in the mirror, and perhaps bash their own face in with a brick.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 08:05 AM
4

Well, I guess that's one way to deny female privelige. Without adding that element of intersectionality, there, you imply that the existence both male and female privelege is a contradictory concept. You see, I could also say that "women are a powerful group," and I would be just as correct as you, but if I were to use that statement in the contexts that you use its distaff counterpart, I would be trivializing sexism against women.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 01:15 AM
2

Your use of the word tethers you to its gynocentricism. Kyriarchy is a more robust and flexible term, overall. Of course, if you are a gynocentrist to begin with, then it is no problem.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:55 AM
6

There are too many progressive minded people who, for whatever reason, buy into the "male as aggressor" gender role. Given that this stereotype has been enforced by traditionalists for far longer than misandristic feminists, it's not surprising that the former would cynically take advantage of the advances of the latter.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:48 AM
2

I would say yes and no. The MRM as it exists today finds itself in a tumultuous infancy. No clear boundaries between differing opinions have formed, and thus, no sub-groups have really "formed" yet. We are left with progressives occupying the same space as conservatives, some of whom are reactionary. This has worked for now, since we are mainly exploring the islands of agreement within the MRM. As we broaden though, we will organize, crystallize, and finally, schism. From here, the more progress…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:34 AM
2

So if the girl says "yes" even though she is intimidated, than I have to conclude that nothing means "yes." And there is no way to reliably gauge intimidation because body language is, by virtue of people not all being the same, ambiguous. And where, from there, do we proceed?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 11:52 PM
10

For god's sake at least try...
/r/MensRights07/08/11 11:15 PM
5

I'm sorry, but the amount of bad faith that goes into each of your posts indicates that you will see us as that no matter what reality indicates.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 04:03 AM
1

I take it that you are anti-abortion, in that case
/r/MensRights04/08/11 04:00 AM
3

Has this guy never heard of guns, knives, or alcohol?
/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:44 AM
1

I'm sorry, but do we really have to place ourselves even further into all these turf wars? I'm getting really sick of all this internet drama.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:22 AM
1

At the end of the day, it's merely a number that redditors worship, for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 05:29 AM
6

I don't. It's the exact same shit, only reversed so that it makes no sense in context.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:38 PM
1

On this, I have to agree. Still, as is all too common on reddit, a ridiculous, possible troll post was bound to happen, and the comment in itself seems to be directed at MR supporters as a whole.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:29 PM
2

To be honest, it really doesn't matter much. The karma system is screwed up, and everything gender related is crossposted to hell and back (we're also guilty, in this respect). Astroturfing is only really notable when it isn't done, these days.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:25 PM
4

I would like to know where all the upvotes came from, since most of them seem to have come in within a very short timeframe, and seem to contradict the general trends of the comment section in question.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:54 PM
3

Was this worth posting? I mean, that blog is so batshit insane that the only people who would possibly defend it are the mods at /r/Anarchism
/r/MensRights01/08/11 08:02 PM
1

Derp? Is that you? I don't understand what you are referring to.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:29 AM
3

Make sure that your accusations of retardation have proper grammar, please. Oh, and that is also an example of you being ableist.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 01:47 AM
-2

So now we will realize that men are horrible because people are horrible! Soon, we will all be cynics, and as a cynic, I have to say that that makes me perversely happy.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 09:04 PM
17

Er, do you really have to take that adversarial tone towards women? The only people I think are really in the wrong are the hypocrites that think, "how can you do that to a girl?" And also, I'm glad for that woman, because now she has learned a lesson about some very unfair laws in our country. When everybody has the problem, nobody can ignore it.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 08:57 PM
1

This specific sentiment isn't really the result of any one group, but rather, is ingrained into our society. I bet most people, even those in this subreddit, feels more emotionally attached to female characters in various forms of media. Women's pain has always been treated as more of a big deal, and since women now exist with less restrictive gender roles now than they have at any other point in the history of civilization, the problem has, well, become more problematic. In short, society doesn…
/r/MensRights31/07/11 08:46 PM
2

You crossposted one of your own comments? In the same subreddit, even? Really?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 08:31 PM
1

Wait... are you Laurelai? If so, then oh shit, internet drama is truly inescapable.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:45 AM
7

Honestly, feminists are not sexists. It's just the movement as a whole is much further from fixing its gynocentrism than it thinks it is. And of course, some feminists are sexists.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:22 AM
8

Which is why Twilight is such a complex piece of literature composed of well developed characters, right?
/r/MensRights30/07/11 11:04 PM
1

Whoa there. A lot of atheists, myself included have a deep respect for Christians sympathetic to atheist causes. The same goes for Feminists and MRAs, and I hope, vice-versa.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:52 PM
3

You just linked to TVTropes. Now I have to waste my time there instead of on reddit.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:41 AM
0

Well, that's the traditionalists for you; they are going to be opposed to all of you for obvious reasons, right? However, some of us have grievances against you guys for more fixable reasons. Gynocentricism and a bit of misandry and stuff. And you guys are not a monolith, because some of you see this as a problem, and some of you guys don't. Some of you are crazy, just as some of us are. Seriously, there are a lot of us that think 2xc is a cool place, and that new "No seriously what about teh me…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:39 AM
3

Hey, it's the internet: communication devoid of communication.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 03:56 AM
-2

That is nice. The post suspecting he was crazy were at +5. In all honesty, isn't it alright for us to have a few crazies. If feminism isn't a monolith, the same must go for MRA's, unless you can think of a convincing reason that that is not the case.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 03:50 AM
5

Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls... with all of these entangled subreddits, it's impossible to have actual dialogue, isn't it?
/r/MensRights26/07/11 03:47 AM
2

Death threats? Not cool.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 11:20 PM
2

Literal genies are generally looked down upon in genie society.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter