TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ValjeansGhost Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by ValjeansGhost on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

(Most) Women will cycle through contradictory arguments in conversation. It's interesting to watch, if conscious of it.
/r/MGTOW03/04/15 03:55 PM
2

Liberal Arts, as an institution, is rapidly collapsing under Mob Justice (which is 'Social Justice.') As a result, we will see ALOT of former 'big names' collapse into meaningless. Pretty soon, the entire value of a College Degree will collapse into itself, similar to how we see 'Diploma Mills.' Long terms, it means that alot of our best thinkers will emerge outside the institution.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:37 PM
3

His worst business mistake was getting married. lol.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:35 PM

being a psychopath means you don't experience empathy the way others do, which is likely to make you more objective, not less. The problem is that it leads to a lack of conscientiousness, followed by conflict between people, followed by group destruction. Psychopaths fucking DEMAND that they are treated well, even if they themselves don't treat others well. The reason why the entire trait is sabotaging is because they expect the world to tip toe for them, and Psychopaths are incapable of working…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:02 PM
1

Imagine if driving schools were permitted to issue driving licences. Brilliant... We really need a seperate institution to evaluate our students. It could be governmental, AND it can private as well. Let the market decide which group of standards they trust. Brilliant. Just Brilliant.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:54 AM

Well. College is now useless.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:49 PM
1

Thanks for the clarification. It saved me some mishaps.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:26 PM

As a Social Conservative, I would accept the "traditional" etiquette of sexual relations. IE: I'll take the bullet, but I better have a damn good life before I do. Thanks Karen for clearing it up.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:01 PM
3

The funny thing is that none of these things would actually work at securing female intimacy. Men would line up to do this shit if women actually showed appreciation for it. So...it's kind of self-defeating that even though she wants this, women themselves refuse to make men want to do this.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:52 PM

Yeah. I got that backwards. It will be ethnically Western, but culturally it will be something new. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:15 PM

I'm serious. And I could also be wrong. But I think it was Warren Farrell who gave me that quote. Either way, genetics is a strange animal, because once the tree extends past three generations, all sorts of bizarre logic emerges.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:02 AM

What he doesn't bother to understand is that our inherent function as men forces our kind to rise or die. We can't bear children, so what would be our function? This is why only 40% of men reproduce, versus 80% of women. It's much harder to be a man, hence genetic pressure forces us to be stronger (or die.)
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:18 AM
4

TBH. Margaret Thatcher was specifically anti-Feminist. Paradoxically, that awareness made her understand the male psyche, which enabled her to manage the War reasonably well. Queen Elizabeth also comes to mind. She found talented men, pointed a direction, and then they fought for the Queen. I would definitely support a female head of state, but the moment she uses her genitals as a crutch, I would throw her overboard. It takes a special kind of woman to understand how men war against each other.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:16 AM

ehh....I don't know about the "Chinese" part. Relative to all the Empires in history, China is underperforming. It's never managed to build its sphere of influence, like Russia it has a disdain for intellectualism, and it has some serious long term problems it doesn't want to solve. Honestly, I see China as Ming Dynasty version 2.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ming_dynasty China is doing what it has done historically; talk to itself and then set itself up to be conquered. I would agree we are on…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:53 PM

Truthfully, Millennials won't learn. A quarter of them outright think they will be Millionares when they retire. Rather, our demise will scare shitless out of future generations. They will point to our generation as old people and desperately avoid that fate. I think of all the young woman today with $100,000 in debt, without families, and think what kind of wreck they will be when they are in their 50's.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:26 PM

Millennial to Millennial. They won't turn back the tide, rather, they will "break" the tide. Masculinity is so hated in our generation that is has guaranteed poverty, insecurity, and weakness for the rest of our lives. As a result, when future generations come of age, they will unconsciously find themselves more and more attractive to masculinity, even if they can't consciously "define it." And as poverty gets more and more serious, Conscientiousness will become less and less important, and ment…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:24 PM

What the article won't state is that the Narcissism is generational rather then gender. Depending on the "birth cohort" a person is born in, determines what the proportion of Narcissism is. The bad news is that Narcissism is a personality disorder, and therefore nearly guaranteed to be life long. And if we are talking about data, I would like to know the gender split among people with Borderline and Histrionic personality disorder as well.... ...but of course, since men and women are different g…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:16 AM
1

The problem with Conservatives is that they are "conserving" a failed empire. If we could have a Conservative movement that invented new rules, instead of upholding old shitty rules, it would take over Earth. Conservatives are wrong for the right reasons.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:23 PM

I keep stressing this Journalists = Sociopaths. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyclay/2013/01/05/the-top-10-jobs-that-attract-psychopaths/ Makes things really simple.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:56 PM
1

Psychopaths are more likely to be Journalists then Cops.... ...just saying. http://time.com/32647/which-professions-have-the-most-psychopaths-the-fewest/
/r/MensRights01/03/15 05:11 PM
3

So happy this was just outright said. It is, and unlike Christianity, it won't last very long
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:11 PM
5

Right now, our situation sucks, but the tide is about to turn. If you want outright hope, then let me call it as it is. (Damn the Red Pill.) Social Justice is the new Christian Right. Right down to the insane sexual codes, the self righteous con artists, the collusion of government censorship, and the suppression of all dissent. Effectively, the SJWs are playing right out of their former adversaries playbook and not missing a beat. The problem, however, is that the Christian Right did what Judas…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 02:10 PM
2

In a fucked up way, this is actually a good thing. The thing is, we already send WAY too many people to College as is, especially because it involves an innate intelligence that only about ~20% of the population has. And the value of a College degree is sinking like a stone. The political correctness bias is actually harming the education process, causing employers to want alternative metrics for their employees. AND there is an intense hate of SJWs among Employers as well, whom are Gentry. In f…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 01:52 PM
1

Check the data. I was shocked when I investigated it. Unlike Sociopathy, Narcissism is "nurture, not nature." https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-narcissism-epidemic/201308/how-dare-you-say-narcissism-is-increasing By the way. That "Socrates quote" people like to bring up. “Our youth now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for their elders and love chatter in place of exercise; they no longer rise when elders enter the room; they contradict their…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:24 PM
1

If we want to work with the system, that system is (Shareholder) Capitalism. I personally dislike it, but at the same time, Anti-Capitalism has to be off-the-table in any kind of Men's Right Movement. (Especially because we would be working with some key Capitalist players.) Politics makes strange bedfellows.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:24 PM

I am actually a Millennial myself, and as someone whose worked with them in politics and employs them, this is commonly known among people who manage them.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:22 PM
1

Forgive me if I don't assume random strangers on the internet don't do an exhaustive search of my post history. Hi. I'm Valjeansghost. Here is the doisser of what I'm about. Please brush up on this before we discuss. Whatever. Keep your trouble and enjoy your blogging.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:21 PM

The goal should be creating a nonprofit which focuses exclusively on MRA. Easier said than done. And the direction should be primarily legal, with a secondary direction in lobbying. (Outreach really isn't necessary in this case; bizarrely, Men's Rights greatest ally is Jezebel.) But what I would NEVER do is actually solicit organization for our behalf; that's just asking to be taken advantage of. Of course, founding a non profit would be extremely difficult. The problem for us would mainly be re…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:47 AM

I agree money is the solution, but not to fund lobbyists, but to fund lawyers. Specifically lawyers who will file lawsuits when there is clear evidence that men's Constitutional Rights are being violated. (Such as with the college rape tribunals). I agree money is the solution, but not to fund lobbyists, but to fund lawyers. Specifically lawyers who will file lawsuits when there is clear evidence that men's Constitutional Rights are being violated. (Such as with the college rape tribunals). I ag…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:13 AM

Right, because god forbid someone challenges an infallible opinion; especially if that opinion lacks any political experience. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/2/new-evidence-suggests-that-the-rich-own-our-democracy.html Do we want to be Donors, or Voters?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:02 PM

These are non-answers. But whatever. Let the MRM keep doing blogging-as-usual. See how that turns out.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:56 PM

Really? Which organizations? What have they accomplished? Last time I checked, we are getting our asses handed to by the legislature and the media. Because besides giving Men's Rights activists Welfare/Patreon money for blogging, IDK what exactly has been done. Of course, Men's Rights activists clearly admit that they don't want to be leaders, so that means its totally okay to subsidize their hobby.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:16 PM

You only need a small intelligent and disciplined core group that can gradually begin to shift public opinion. I can testify to that. What I meant to say wasn't "we need a thousands in the street." What I meant to say was that it would be effectively impossible to create a "People for the American Way/Focus on Family/Planned Parenthood" style organization. Where-as I wouldn't expect American people to donate time, my problem is that they wouldn't even donate money either. (We are so lazy we won'…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:10 PM

Good luck trying to organize "average" Americans; men, women, or whatever. It's like herding stray cats; they're penniless yet stubbornly individualistic. Honestly, if we could take online donations to hire a lobbyist firm(s) to represent us in key states and DC, we could easily save ourselves. Of course, we would need to have a public face represent were we pool our political donations... But Muh Leaderlessness. Exactly.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 12:41 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 06:17 PM

Yes, but it won't be obvious for a least two or three decades. When the current generation of Feminists grow up and "normal people" realize how "coddled" they were, nobody will want to deal with them. Right now, resources are extremely tight, but when Baby Boomers pass from positions of power, Feminism is on the chopping block. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz0o9clVQu8 In effect, the sheer amount of privileges that will be demanded from third wave feminists means that both men AND women will w…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:05 PM

You will suffer, and it will make you stronger. In retrospect, if you get through this, then 80% of life's encounters will be much easier.... If anything, think of it as carrying a very heavy weight on your back, to "train the soul" for life. It's a challenge, as well as a political statement.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:45 PM

It's worth noting that in the Bible, it's a sin to have sex with a Divorced women. (Jesus spoke against Divorce; not gay marriage. Funny enough) That was, in essence, what kept "marriage" in check. Now. I believe Sola Scripture is a lie, and Christianity is doomed, but I'm just adding perspective to a "Biblical institution." Also, the concept of "annulment" existed so that a priest had to be sure the man or woman had a good reason to divorce, instead of "feelz."
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:00 AM
2

Now you know the biggest weakness of Conservatism; it keeps thinking the "market is on it's side...." When it never was, nor will it be.
/r/MGTOW30/01/15 02:40 PM
1

I agree that a synthesis of the two positions needs to be expressed. There is anti-male prejudice at college, and its ruining the value of a college degree by discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:32 PM
6

The real pain will emerge when Feminism fails women by ignoring their real problems (loneliness, overexhaustion, lack of fatherhood, lack of understanding men) for these pseudo-gawker issues. When the Millennial women have a collective "oh shit" moment @ ~2020, it will be a series of tantrums heard around the world.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:50 PM

Okay. So you are right libertarian Status quo, but return back to liberty. Meanwhile, Feminism continues to be advocated by billionaires and government....but of course! They are still "the rebels" like they tell us shepple to believe. Honestly, the former right got crushed to the "new left" which is now the "New right." However long it takes to come to terms with this, determines how long it will be before men's rights get serious. We don't need Reagan, we need Lincoln.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:50 AM
2

This is a tough pill to swallow, because men still think the markets are on their side... But of course, who does the shopping...
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:08 AM

Right= status quo Left = change Authoritarian= hierarchy Libertarian = anarchy Feminism = hierarchical status quo What is hard about this?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter