TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Valmar33 Archive

View 1 posts and 474 comments by Valmar33 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You're not even seeking dialogue ~ you just want to be correct.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:54 AM
0

My statements are based on statements by one of the best-known clinical psychologists, Prof. Sam Vaknin, who repeatedly refers to studies that confirm this view, while you only bring in your personal disbelief here. Prof.: Vaknin https://www.youtube.com/@samvaknin Sorry. but that doesn't make your or his definitions of "empathy" and "compassion" the one true correct definitions.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:18 AM
0

Yes, I know, it's not a simple but correct insight. It is actually counter-intuitive, but don't let your feelings guide you. On closer inspection, it makes a lot of sense. You haven't even explained why it is "correct". You yourself are letting your feelings guide you. I have worked extensively with these emotions, seeking self-understanding, so I know that empathy is distinct from compassion. You can have empathy without compassion and empathy with compassion. Heck, you can have (fake) sympathy…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 09:06 AM
-2

That's not quite right. Firstly, Vaknin himself refers to several general studies in which these results are presented. Secondly, this also applies to people with age-related empathy. But it is up to you, If you don't like the results. Sorry, but just because someone says something doesn't make it absolute truth. It's just their model, their definitions, which I do not happen to share, because my own life experiences lead me to rather different definitions, which I refined over time. So it's not…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:20 AM
0

A woman’s empathy is the opposite of compassion. Studies show that the higher the level of empathy, the lower the level of compassion. That makes no sense whatsoever. You are confusing and conflating narcissism with "empathy". In reality, empathy and compassion are subtly different psychological capacities. You can have empathy without compassion, in the sense that a psychopath or narcissist might exploit. You can have compassion without empathy ~ not understanding what exactly someone is going …
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:11 AM
22

The higher your empathy, the lower your ability to understand and perceive emotions. You are too preoccupied with yourself to be able to focus on others. The result is self-pity instead of compassion. That makes no sense whatsoever. You are confusing and conflating narcissism with "empathy". In reality, empathy and compassion are subtly different psychological capacities. You can have empathy without compassion, in the sense that a psychopath or narcissist might exploit. You can have compassion …
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:11 AM
18

Oh, so these women endorse sexual assault? Can these individuals not just be honest with themselves?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 01:49 AM
2

Ah. Guess it's easy to confuse the two. But I'll correct it.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:02 PM
12

Not getting baby-trapped and having to pay alimony child support for a child you didn't want, because she lied about birth control?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 01:39 PM
1

Oh, she probably will be, literally, after her prison mates get a hold of her...
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/23 04:03 AM
12

Neo-feminism and the damage caused by it. That's why. We need to clone you. ❤️ Feminism itself is simply toxic and sexist. It was never about women's rights, from the outset. It was about using the motte of women's rights to hide their true agenda, the gaining of special privileges, the bailey. Even the proto-Feminists, the Suffragettes, were privileged, sexist slime. They were composed of exclusively rich and wealthy white women who wanted special privileges ~ the right to vote without having t…
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:42 AM
23

Feminists seem to hate women who rebel against their political insanity more than they hate men, at times. Probably because women are the only ones they can't easily dismiss out of hand as "misogynist".
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:35 AM
8

Wait... what was the 11 million for?
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:11 AM
3

Casey Anthony was ruled innocent. The idea of assuming someone is guilty even though a trial declared them not guilty is feminist BS. Let’s not be like feminists. Casey Anthony is not guilty and should be treated that way. Right... ruled "innocent". Doesn't make her actually "innocent", though: 【WONDERLAND】 3 weeks ago (edited) Let’s just look at the facts: You didn’t report your daughter missing for over a month Your car smelled like a dead body You lied to detectives about the case numerous ti…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 03:32 PM
34

Racism and sexism really happen though. That's not being denied. Is it fair to dismiss most of the people mentioning it? What they were probably trying to say is that those who complain about racism and sexism the loudest and most often are all too often projecting their own racist and/or sexist attitudes onto others. So, they assume that everyone else must be secretly as racist and/or sexist as they are, but aren't admitting to it, so they feel the need to "call them out". u/bigez526 would the …
/r/MensRights13/11/22 02:28 AM
22

"Men are trash, kill all men" is bad. So is "I want to kill you in front of your children", a quote that is apparently taken from /r/MensRights. Okay... give us a direct link to that quote that is apparently taken from r/MensRights. Let us see the score. Let us see the responses. Please.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 07:09 AM
2

The weird thing about that is genuinely crazy people generally don't think they're crazy... so you'd think that wouldn't fly...
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:17 AM
3

Dude, stop the indoctrination, and stop lying to the upper commenter. Lying? Why do you believe that I'm lying? Even wealthy women did have far fewer rights then men Evidence, please... so much so that they couldn't refuse men whenever men wanted to rape the living shit out of them. You bring up rape as an example... and then provide no evidence for it. Going for the shock factor isn't going to change my mind.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 10:11 PM
10

back when women legit had less rights than men feminism was legit. eowyn was "old world" feminism as far as being like a tomboy, the kind of "feminist" that was around back when us millenials were kids (90s to 2000s) It wasn't really a gender problem, so much as a class problem, despite appearances. The rich, upper class women didn't, and still don't, have less rights than the rich, upper class men. It's a very, very different world up there. But, the rich, upper class leeches needed, and still …
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 10:44 AM
22

I don't see Eowyn as being Feminist at all. Not in book or movie. There is no "reasonable Feminism". Never was. Feminism only ever pretended to care about, and take credit for, women's rights.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/22 08:24 AM
3

Amber Heard doesn't represent all women. Amber Heard represents herself, and other nasty women like her. There are plenty of women who are nothing like Amber Heard.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 06:06 AM
1

They said "some women". Did that not register for you...?
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 09:39 AM
3

Tell me you're an incel without telling me ... you, uh, do know what "incel" stands for, right...? Their comments says nothing about them being an involuntary celibate...
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 09:38 AM
6

I'm of the opinion that Feminism began as an authoritarian ideology. The Suffragette movement, proto-Feminism, was also authoritarian, I think. It was created and run by rich, upper-class, well-to-do women who wanted the right to vote without the responsibilities. That is, without having to be conscripted into the army, as men were, in order to be able to vote. The very roots of Feminism lie in the desire for rights without responsibilities, for special privileges, exclusive to women. The founde…
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 08:09 AM
12

I would say, more precisely, that it is authoritarian centrist. I say this as a libertarian centrist who is thoroughly disgusted by authoritarianism in all of its forms.
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/22 05:45 AM
79

Feminists be like "circumcision is just cosmetic" I guess bleeding to death is "just cosmetic"...
/r/MensRights27/03/22 12:37 PM
14

Feminism as a movement was crazy from the beginning. Even the Suffragette movement was crazy. The crazy ones were the leaders and founders, willful in their lies and malice. The rest have been manipulated, indoctrinated and lied to about the "evils" of men.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 05:31 AM
37

Feminism is based on equality. So if you call me, a man, an asshole, then as your equal I can call you, a woman an asshole. Yep. If Feminists want to claim that Feminism is about equality ~ fine! If they say they hate men, men can say they hate women! After all, that's equality, right? Except it turns out that Feminism pretends to be about equality while they truly don't want any sort of equality. What they really want is preferential treatment and privileges. Including the privilege of being ab…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 05:28 AM
12

Basically, a bunch of whataboutism.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 09:15 AM
6

Replace "men" and "man" with "women" and "woman" in this sexist-as-all-hell diatribe, and the Feminist crowd would lose their fucking marbles.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 03:22 AM
9

As long as you're in unforced agreeance with it, there's no harm to it.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/22 02:13 AM
18

This is a massive generalization with no meaningful evidence.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 10:57 PM
3

You think women just go around randomly stabbing men because of female privilege? It's reasonable to think that after years of abuse someone would snap like that and not even feel bad about killing their abuser. Seriously read the article. It's not all hearsay. You're presuming that there must be an innocent reason that she just stabbed him to death gleefully. You're presuming that she's an "innocent victim of abuse", when you have absolutely zero evidence for that mindset. Reality check: women …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/21 05:27 AM
3

She says that, after to saying all that shit to the medical operators??? She's a very bad liar.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/21 05:24 AM
2

Please don't generalize all women as being like this, because it's only a few that go to horrifying extremes like this. There are just as many women as men who have these kinds of mindsets ~ both sexes tend to act on them in different ways, though, due to psychological differences.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/21 05:22 AM
19

I strongly suspect that the reason that rates for woman-on-man violence ballooning are because the violent women are receiving little to no consequences for their actions the overwhelming majority of the time, so they often keep reoffending again, again and again, escalating in the severity of their violence as they do. They're literally being told that they can do whatever they want without being punished or reprimanded, so the problem just keeps escalating. "Patriarchy", my fucking arse.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 09:28 AM
3

I got banned from r/pics just by participating in NoNewNormal, lol.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 01:38 AM
7

And what do colleges teach women? Feminist propaganda. Which includes, among other things, anti-male hatred, and teaching women to gold dig, because they "deserve" it.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:47 PM
24

Not all women are Feminists. Not all women are man-haters or rapists.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 11:56 AM
29

No wonder the man's fucking traumatized ~ being sexually assaulted and there being zero consequence for the woman will do that to you.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/21 12:51 AM
9

That's just regular Feminism.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 09:12 AM
3

I feel like there has to be a healthy balance and harmonization of genuine traditionalism and genuine progressivism in order for culture and society to remain stable. Going to far in either extreme results in social regressivism, stagnation and general rot: Extreme traditionalism is regressive because no-one wants to rock the boat or make any changes where they might be required, even if certain existing traditions are legitimately harmful. This is pretty self-explanatory. Extreme progressivism …
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:04 AM
1

I think so ~ if only to highlight to the local trolls that they, as individuals, just every bit as sexist as they blindly exclaim that all men supposedly are.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:57 AM
1

What the US is currently going through in terms of social bullshit and media focus, is quite different to what Europe is going through. Really..because all I see from conservatives in the US is bashing BLM riots & CRT or complaining about the election and how bad Biden/Kamala are. Maybe, just maybe, because that's the big social focus there at the moment, so it receives a massive amount of attention. Don't mistake a focus on something much more immediate like BLM and CRT, for lack of criticism o…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 12:06 PM
4

I don't see nearly as much silence as you claim. A lot of people are silent in general, because they're afraid of getting eaten alive by the rabid mob.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:45 AM
2

How aren't Conservatives going after Feminism? I see a lot of criticism of it. The majority of Conservatives aren't racist these days. Neo-Liberals outweigh them in that arena by many miles.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:44 AM
2

Early Feminism was run exclusively by upper-class rich white women, who hated not only men, but also black people.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:36 PM
48

Feminism has never been about equality, even from its very earlier days.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 10:09 AM
23

Circumcision is disgusting, unless there is a truly legitimate condition which is life-threatening, where said circumcision cannot be avoided. These millions of males get circumcised because of either insane religious bullshit, or because their awful mothers or some other authority decided they didn't like foreskins on penises.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:08 AM
23

Traditionalism also additionally has women provide for men ~ men and women filling in gaps for each other's weak spots.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 12:19 PM
15

You also get plenty of average-to-pretty types whose ugliness is on the inside.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/21 09:18 AM
61

They don't even comprehend that this kind of thinking is extremely sexist. They presume that the abused male must have to done something to deserve being hit by the female abuser. [Edited my comment to be slightly clearer]
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/21 09:50 AM
35

Also don't believe the stat that 1:3 college women are raped. It's a bullshit stat. You mean to tell me women would honestly put themselves in a place where they have a 33% chance of being knowingly raped and parents would send their kids to play were 33% of them got raped? Don't be stupid and believe such a clear out and out lie. I'd be willing to bet that the overwhelming majority of that figure is regret sex reported as rape, mostly due to the Neo-Liberal education they get which teaches thes…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:22 AM
2

If you want genuine equality, you're an Egalitarian, not a Feminist. Feminism has been a female supremacist movement from its very roots.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 01:09 AM
7

There's nothing inherently "submissive" about being feminine. That's a Feminist projection.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/21 09:39 AM
10

In the Feminist worldview, all men are a blob ~ an evil blob. Women are in two camps ~ the blob who believe that men are evil, and the blob that believe that men aren't. Obviously, the latter blob are every bit as evil as the male blob, according to Feminist logic.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 08:59 AM
10

Now this is a woman who understands and desires genuine equality!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/20 04:20 AM
13

Correction: a Feminist president would be a disaster. Now, an anti-Feminist female president would actually be someone I could cheer for.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/20 06:20 PM
27

Feminism has always been an anti-male movement from the very beginning. From the beginning, it was spearheaded by rich, wealthy upper-class white women who also hated black people. So, not just misandrist, but filthily racist too! Much like today's Feminism... which has been divided by SJW ideology, as usual, because SJWs eat their own. So... we have the TERFs and the intersectional Feminists tearing at each others throats over the usual ideological purity spiral insanity.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/20 10:31 AM
8

The toxic attitude underlying this is Feminism!
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/20 01:20 PM
12

Except that Feminism's history demonstrates that it's a female supremacist movement. Indeed... in the beginning, it was a upper-class, well-to-do racist white woman's supremacist movement.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/20 03:43 PM
16

A horrible generalization, on the level of how Feminism generalizes men. Many women today act like children ~ too true, maddeningly. But, also, many women act quite sane. You never really hear about them, because they're not going around burning shit to the ground, figuratively speaking.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/20 11:38 AM
5

The context of the comment they're replying to is about Saudi Arabia in particular.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 06:44 AM
7

That's just the opposite extreme of the Radical Feminist position, and is as equally untrue. Saudi Arabian women suffer almost daily... and yet, you don't see any Feminist giving a single damn.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 03:41 AM
2

It's no asexual. Its taking different genetic information from two different mothers. Yes, but that's not the point ~ it's that the unnatural process of doing so has no long-term studies. In the future, we can use genetic engineering to cure genetic defects. That's making some massive presumptions ~ that we actually understand how to edit DNA without introducing hard-to-detect genetic problems down the line. So far, I don't trust any of the claims that we totally know how to edit DNA without cau…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/20 04:51 AM
3

Okay ~ but what about any potential genetic defects down the line due to this unnatural tampering of DNA?
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/20 04:24 AM
2

In theory, that sounds interesting. In practice, it'll probably lead to lots of genetic problems in the long-term. If not the first or second generations, maybe generations down the track.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/20 04:23 AM
2

The first wave of Feminism was exclusively for rich, wealthy white women, who, as you can guess, were extraordinarily privileged, and as you can further guess, wanted more and more, as being rich and wealthy all too often coincides with greed. They were also extremely racist towards non-white women, along with their veiled hatred towards men in general.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 03:56 AM
3

Without sperm being involved, an egg will not become a baby.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/20 03:35 AM
2

lmao, no they didn't. That's the trojan horse, though ~ the smokescreen for their real agenda.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 02:29 AM
8

It's one where female supremacists have all the privilege. Non-conforming women will be treated as badly as men. As "gender traitors".
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/20 02:29 AM
8

There's also a rather major con ~ what if you're lucky enough to find a sane woman who you then want to have a child with at some stage?
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/20 03:40 PM
6

Who would feel sorry for him? Human beings with a fucking heart, that's who.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:05 AM
3

I doubt it. The stupid amount of "victims" who came forward conveniently as Trump was running for the presidency was highly suspicious. And this was merely another attempt at trying to #MeToo Trump.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 10:21 PM
-2

That plantiff withdrew at the very last moment, claiming that she was being threatened. Frankly, that seems like utter bullshit ~ if she were really being threatened, she wouldn't have said anything. She's just another politically-motivated liar.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:47 PM
5

Evidence would be nice.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:19 PM
40

Keep in mind that these particular women are Feminists. They're very fucking loud and common on Twitter, but I bet they're a minority offline. Nevertheless, Twitter has too much power... too much influence on corporations. And vice-versa.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 06:07 PM
15

What. The. Fuck. Also... they evidently don't understand how biology works, lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/20 01:27 PM
2

Well, first, commenters need to know that it's satire. And frankly, I don't condemn them for mistaking it as real, rather than satire. It's a really sad state of affairs when satire hits too close to a very potential reality...
/r/MensRights04/06/20 12:21 PM
11

The sad reality is that many Feminists would actually believe this insanity.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 10:53 AM
16

"Clever play on words" ~ yeah, to attack and smear men.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/20 05:57 AM
26

She IS a Feminist, and a misandrist. Feminism is misandrist by definition.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:34 PM
3

It's Feminists who don't have a single fucking inkling of what real oppression is like. Such as living under the reign of totalitarians and dictators, such as in North Korea, the Soviet Unio,n or Maoist and modern day China. They've been so sheltered from the real world, and are so fucking privileged that their idea of what "oppression" is, so fucking shallow and laughable, and sometimes, disturbing. As in... they feel oppressed when they can't just freely oppress others. And even when they can,…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:05 AM
20

You mean it's mocking the men's rights movement? Yeah, that's obvious.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:29 AM
37

No, it's not. They regularly enough post hateful shit.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 09:07 AM
66

According to Feminists, only Feminists can "correctly" portray women. And yet, the only portrayals they can create are extremely cringe-worthy, unrealistic ones...
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/20 06:54 AM
3

Like "toxic masculinity", "toxic femininity" doesn't exist. There's nothing "feminine" about being a murderous psycho.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/20 07:23 AM
0

You're the one living in the fairytale, my man.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 05:06 PM
0

Back then, voting required being drafted into the military, and only men could be drafted. Not exactly a good thing... Feminism ~ by rich, well-to-do white women ~ managed to allow women to have the vote ~ without having to be drafted into military service. And much worse than that, they didn't want black people to be able to vote, being a racist lot. Thankfully, though, at some point, men could vote without being forced into miltary service. And at some point, black people, male and female, tho…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 04:12 PM
1

The fact that you have to qualify your statement with "overall" is pretty clean cut evidence that even you do not genuinely believe in that generalization. Then we have different understandings of how the word is used then. Much of them are simply using the momentum of a genuine, beneficial movement to support an overtly prejudiced and sexist agenda. Nothing beneficial about Feminism in any of the cultures it inhabits ~ all of said cultures do not have any issues with women's rights, making Femi…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 03:27 PM
1

How is this a fallacy, lmao? Feminism is pretty fucking misandrist, overall. The Feminist movements interestingly operate most heavily in cultures where women don't lack any rights, and don't even seem to exist in any of the cultures where women are actually treated as objects ~ like Saudi Arabia, for example.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 03:03 PM
1

All Feminists are entitled. No exceptions.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/20 01:31 PM
193

The female supremacists do, at least. It can be a struggle to hold onto the fact that not all women are disgusting misandrists, but merely only a subset. A very vocal, loud, screeching minority with too much power.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/20 01:21 AM
7

Just remember that statistics can be extremely misleading, and that said studies can be extremely biased and / or have very incomplete data. What about all of the cases that are not reported? Or cases that have been reported, but have been completely ignored? So, said studies are difficult to trust, because we simply don't know whether they're studies that have been done properly, or have accounted for all the cases that never get reported nor documented.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:12 PM
8

Imagine living in a world where men have constantly tried to prevent women from having rights lmao, no they haven't. The reality is that the rich, upper-class males and females have tried to prevent the middle and lower classes of males and females from having rights. This continues today. Unless you want to accuse lower class men of somehow preventing upper women from having rights or some other crap.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:57 AM
12

And legitimate involuntary celibates, at that. No-one wants to date or fuck these hateful scum, so, as is the norm for these kind of women, they project.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:34 AM
7

If the "Patriarchy" they scream about really existed, they wouldn't be able to constantly smear, attack and belittle men and boys like they do, and keep getting away with it. Nor would they be able to accuse males with false accusations of abuse and rape, and get away with it 99% of the time, without having to provide a shred of evidence for their claims. Almost like they're a bunch of filthy misandrists that live a cult mindset.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:32 AM
10

Globalism is bad because it is basically totalitarianism and Capitalism turned up to 11. Think China... but on a global scale. Evil billionaires really do want to rule the planet with an iron fist. It's not just a movie plot, sadly...
/r/MensRights28/03/20 08:05 AM
12

Classic projection. Feminism is the real virus. And more broadly, SJW ideology. And even more broadly, Globalism.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 07:42 AM
5

Somehow, being a voluntary celibate means that it's... involuntary? You SJWs sure are weird.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 09:14 PM
15

According to various legal systems in the West, apparently it's not ~ because of Feminists fucking with the legal system.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:31 AM
64

Who knows. Might be, might not be. As that saying goes, on the internet, no-one knows you're a cat. :)
/r/MensRights19/02/20 01:17 PM
3

Not surprising that she's nothing more than a malicious, greedy, money-hungry gold-digger. She wants what wasn't hers.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:06 AM
7

I see that you chose to ignore my comment. Again, I do not personally recognize toxic, shitty behaviour to be "masculine" nor "feminine".
/r/MensRights11/02/20 06:17 PM
7

I disagree. We just have different understandings of the terms "masculine" and "feminine".
/r/MensRights11/02/20 05:33 PM
6

I perceive it as you unintentionally falling into the trap of using their logic and thinking, which is not a solution. It only adds to the fire. Both males and females can be aggressive and toxic in physical and emotional ways, depending on their individual personalities.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 05:03 PM
19

Which is about as real "toxic masculinity" ~ that is to say, it isn't. I see nothing remotely feminine nor masculine in malicious intentions.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 02:01 PM
6

Ah, but they do ~ they just have different goals to you. The political compass cannot describe the vast differences in belief that people can have, nor describe the complexities of political beliefs. Someone might be, say Libertarian Rightist on many things, but then on some topics, be Authoritarian Leftist. The best way to look at the political compass is your position being at the center of where all of your various perspectives fall ~ as you will have different ideas about the same subject fr…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:20 AM
5

They're more Centrist, if you factor in that they have no problem with money or lavish amounts of personal possessions... for themselves and their friends. They're Authoritarian Centrists.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:43 AM
2

Just because some feminists are misandrist doesn’t mean all of them have to be. But, the movement completely is, and that's inescapable. Stop apologizing for a destructive moment that seeks to ruin and destroy innocent men. Well I certainly trust Wikipedia more than the word of some rando on the internet such as yourself. Ah, what an arrogant Feminist and Feminist apologist you are. Stop shilling. No they didn’t. How didn't they, then? If feminism came about because women couldn’t vote, than tha…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 12:03 PM
1

Don't allow yourself to be blinded by the damage that Feminism has caused to the female. Female-led tribes were not inferior to male-led tribes, nor were they superior. It's simply a difference of tribal customs. Female-led tribes didn't progress any slower than male-led ones, either. Indeed, there exist innumerable tribes today, uncontacted, both male-led and female-led, that have been unchanged because why change what has worked for innumerable generations? They're not exactly missing out on a…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:56 AM
1

Well I mean, I consider myself a feminist, but I also don’t think I’m misandrist, I just think that women and men face injustices today and injustices in the past, and that that needs to change If you can even think of considering yourself a Feminist, then you understanding nothing about just how deeply misandrist Feminist currently is. Wikipedia says Just because Wikipedia says something, does not make it truthful. Wikipedia has massive, undisclosed biases. I think rather than saying people who…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:52 AM
1

feminism and feminists are all about equal rights, it’s feminazis you’re thinking of First of all, Feminist was never about equal rights! It was always, from the beginning, about gaining special privileges. And if you really care about genuine equality, you are egalitarian, not Feminist. Feminism is about female supremacy. This is especially true today. Indeed, Feminists have been fighting, maliciously, to take many rights away from men, while publicly pretending that they're doing nothing of th…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:30 AM
3

No ~ rather, if we listened to Feminists, female supremacists, we'd still be living in caves. There are various tribal cultures which were matriarchal, and they did fine, because both sexes were genuine equals.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 12:45 AM
5

What "systematic oppression of women and girls"? Females are being given more and more and more, and males, less and less and less. Tell me again about females being "oppressed". I guess if the Feminists don't get what they arrogantly believe they're entitled to, it's "oppression". These days, Feminists talk about how they're "strong" and "independent" and "don't need no man" ~ and then proceed to hypocritically play the "poor, innocent wahman", who's being "victimized" by the "evil, oppressive …
/r/MensRights18/01/20 11:42 PM
4

Is that your inner Smeagol coming out, by any chance...?
/r/MensRights18/01/20 11:34 PM
1

Ah. Weird. I expected r/science to be to be full of the hard-nosed Materialist types.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 08:03 PM
4

More precisely, we want fairness and balance, which leads to equality. It's impossible to have it 50/50 everywhere, so we compromise on males focusing their strengths on areas they're best suited to, and the same for females. Which is why males are generally better suited for being fire-fighters and construction work ~ that shit takes physical strength, and a stoic, unyielding attitude where emotions are put aside to focus on the gritty task at hand. Females are better suited for tasks that invo…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 12:09 AM
12

"Maximum female benefit" ~ could they possibly be more transparent...?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:38 PM
8

Probably because the Men's Rights Movement is somehow... "anti-science" from the mods' bizarre perspective.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:37 PM
1

As if you needed any more confirmation as to how fucking scummy and emotionally fragile these Feminists are.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:35 PM
1

What a bunch of absolute nothing...
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:42 AM
9

What a way to create a strawman. You Feminists are disgustingly misandrist ~ only the woman's autonomy matters, and not the man's. There's zero equality in that.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:14 AM
5

You are the victim if she got pregnant by mistake, and you never intended to have a child, but she wants it anyways, just so she can demand what amounts of a free paycheck from you.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:11 AM
4

Fine ~ then men don't have to agree to child support, either, for a child they didn't want. Fairness and equality.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:09 AM
-1

Lol, that's the point of abortion, to prevent that from happening. If the pregnancy were caused by rape, I could understand. Or if by a leaky condom, that too. But, regret sex? Yeah, maybe they should have been more fucking careful. Or maybe they should abort in the first trimester. Otherwise it transcends into becoming murder. Once again, no it's not. Justifying murder ~ how cute. You could cause the death of your newborn infant by simply refusing to give it a blood transfusion and it would not…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:08 AM
5

Then maybe that woman shouldn't be having a fucking baby if they cannot compromise some! Once pregnant, and the fetus has grown to a stage that it can actually survive outside of the body, premature or mature, then it become murder to abort it.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 01:35 AM
4

I guess you think the fetus is a blob of unfeeling flesh, then. Disgusting. The fetus is known to be conscious by the second semester, so any abortions by then are akin to murder. By that stage, the mother is responsible for bringing no harm to the life they carry inside them. Anti-natalism is a disgusting ideology.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 12:47 AM
1

That's because East Asian countries don't actually consume that much soy. They consume far less of it than Western countries do.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 03:52 PM
1

Well, you have an excellent family, then. :) One not ruined by Feminism, which would simply ignore the issue.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:42 AM
4

This is not about the world not becoming perfect in a day. This is about society being manipulated by misandrist Feminists into catering almost exclusively to them, and ignoring and belittling men.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 12:18 AM
3

Quite true. Eating too much soy would probably increase the risk significantly, as the isoflavones in soy are particularly toxic, especially with large quantities.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:40 PM
7

Ah, a Feminist. Not very subtle, are you? I doubt many men will just pop into a van to get their prostate checked before doing their weekly shop. If such support were available, men might be willing to, just because it's there. Just like women. They’re often too embarrassed to even make a private appointment. Not true. At some point you have to stop blaming feminists for everything and take some responsibility for your life and your health. At some point, you have to stop blaming the world's evi…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:16 PM
178

Meanwhile, at my local shopping center, there's been a breast screening van there for the last 5 days. I never see any equivalents for male health. Because apparently, men don't matter in today's society. Thanks, Feminism, for bringing us your undesired "equality".
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:28 PM
6

They're talking about themselves and other male feminists, I suppose. Creeps, all of them.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 09:36 PM
1

I fully agree. Very nice biochemistry lesson. :) However... soybeans are rather quite different, for a significant reason. They contain a form of phytoestrogen called isoflavones, which are far more potent than most any other kind. They may even be dangerous. For men and women both. For men, it's a bit worse, because of just how much it fucks with the male hormone balance. That's why man-boobs happen, and why the soy-voice is a meme. And why soyboys are a concept. While most other phytoestrogens…
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:33 AM
2

Phytoestrogens mimick estrogen ~ it fits into the very same receptors that estrogen fits into, thus tricking the body. If you're not going to cite studies, then I'm going to presume you're full of shit, and that dairy and meat are completely fine. Phytoestrogen consumption will fuck with your testosterone levels, far and away more than any consumption of meat and dairy ever will. Go back to /r/vegancirclejerk.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 09:50 PM
1

That is not the "literal" definition at all: This article is about the sexual preference toward prepubescent children. It is not to be confused with hebephilia or ephebophilia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent (early adolescent) children (especially those showing Tanner stages 2 to 3 of development), which is typically ages 11–14. It differs from pedophilia (the primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescen…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 09:23 PM
1

People's emotions regarding an awful subject will often get the better of them. Understandable, as it's difficult to think rationally about a subject heavy with entirely justified disgust and horror.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 08:36 PM
2

Hard to tell on the internet, unfortunately... :/
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 04:24 PM
2

I don't doubt actual children were also involved in his criminal activity.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 04:24 PM
4

You can drop the mocking tone. She's still a criminal, plain and simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 03:50 PM
5

the only people who make the pedo/hebe/statutory distinction are themselves hebephiles That's quite the reductive statement. How do you even know that all who draw that distinction are like that? You don't. What I care about is the accuracy of words, and the meaningful distinctions of concepts. We have these distinctive concepts for a reason. I'm someone who likes to make rational distinctions about things, so I can understand the subtleties better. Children and young teenagers are equally vulne…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 03:04 PM
25

Young, pubescent teenagers, technically. Making her technically a hebephile. Which still means she's committing statutory rape. Teenagers can be more vulnerable, in certain ways, as they're going through the confusing process of puberty, which can leave them more open to grooming and manipulation.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 02:19 PM
-1

Sure, you would indeed see men being painted as a pedophile, but it's still an inaccurate use of the word, which can distort the perspective of the situation in subtle ways. The woman committed statutory rape, but she's not technically a pedophile, but a hebephile. Still fucked up, though, as the teenagers are still going through the most intense stages of puberty, leaving them quite vulnerable to grooming. There's a significant reason that the age of consent is generally 18 years old, which is …
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 02:17 PM
6

Technically, you are quite correct. The fact that it's statutory rape if they're below the age of consent still counts. Pedophilia is the sexual attraction towards pre-pubescent children, specifically. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebephilia: Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent (early adolescent) children (especially those showing Tanner stages 2 to 3 of development), which is typically ages 11–14. It differs from pedophilia (the primary or e…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 02:11 PM
1

Well, that again comes down to indoctrination. No-one is born with any biases for or against anyone or any group.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 10:35 PM
2

Ramble? This is an excellent response with an excellent amount of thoughtful detail.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:47 AM
3

And who do you think cultivated the seeds for that mentality? Radical Feminists treating men like crap, so, obviously, some men will become rather embittered by the betrayal and backstabbing and heartbreak, and then see every single women as being potentially like their abusive partner. Deep emotional wounds do not heal easily.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:39 AM
2

Which is grimly and darkly amusing, because today's women, many of whom are indoctrinated into believing they're entitled to everything, because of their "poor, oppressed wahmen" mentality, are often far more animalistic and violent than the men they claim thay are. They become whores they believe they're entitled to have sex whenever and whoever they desire.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:35 AM
10

The Radical Feminists have created these disgusting stereotypes about men through inserting themselves into positions of power where they can indoctrinate the next generation ~ into the education system and the media. In this way, they can also control government policy to an extent. After many generations of this, today's awfully misandrist society is the result, with "miosgynist" being yelled whenever the indoctrinated woman doesn't get her way, as she's been indoctrinated to believe that she'…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:27 AM
4

And I bet she provided exactly zero evidence.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:57 PM
12

These SJWs loathe any notion of meritocracy, because they don't have any genuine skills or talents. Instead, it's "straight 'cis' white man BAD! REEEEEEE!"
/r/MensRights29/12/19 05:15 AM
9

Like... male terrorists, I suppose? Of the politically-correct types, of course.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 04:51 PM
5

I would be in worse shape physically if I hadn't been circumcised. If you have actual, legitimate medical reasons, then sure. Would you mind sharing why? Sadly, for 99.99% of males, it's always due to cosmetic reasons.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 02:32 AM
14

You're "fine" ~ or have you really just repressed and numbed the pain that is still there, buried?
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:22 AM
1

I do agree. Hormone-ridden teenagers will be like that...
/r/MensRights15/12/19 06:06 PM
13

You're quoting... satire, you know that?
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:49 AM
12

Sure. Same goes for girls. But, nevertheless, it is illegal.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:08 AM
2

By Feminist psychologists, you mean.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 09:39 PM
2

This is just "toxic masculinity" as defined by misandrist Feminists, so it's meaningless.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 07:18 PM
17

These "prosectors" can fuck off. Who will dropping false reporting charges against these liars harm? REAL VICTIMS!
/r/MensRights11/12/19 07:12 PM
1

Far from it. Globalists = billionaires who believe they have the right to do whatever they want. Some Globalists are Jewish, sure, but that doesn't mean very much. The Jewish Globalists couldn't care less about their fellow Jews, except with how they can weaponize them.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:06 AM
44

Really, the meme should be based on those glasses from They Live. Makes more sense that way. Maybe that was the point they were going for.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 01:24 PM
1

And you, most deliberately, are trying to downplay the horrifying effects of Globalism on the entire planet.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 03:23 AM
11

"Boogeyman" lol The Globalists are the billionaires who're obsessed with enslaving humanity, and stealing everyone's wealth and resources. They don't have the resources to enslave us all with brute force, so they prefer to make us fight among ourselves. Men against women. White against non-white people. Straight against non-straight people. Etc.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:24 PM
0

Globalism isn't actually that old, you know.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:21 PM
4

And you're acting like a shitty troll. "Clown world" is used where appropriate, and sometimes, there's no context that calls for it. Like this post. It's used in ridiculous, laughable scenarios. And this scenario is so very far from a joke. It's horrifying and enraging.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 04:15 PM
1

It's a deliberate social engineering that's turned indigenous communities into absolute shitholes. The Globalists want to pit white and black people against each other, and what better way to do that than break black communities to a million pieces, and then give them a victimhood status that allows them to do whatever the fuck they want?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 04:13 PM
41

Just more Globalist efforts to fracture, divide, and destroy. The women are coddled, made to feel like perpetual victims, while the men are abused, made to feel like they're evil. It's because, in a healthy society, men are the warriors and protectors, while women are the emotional hub. They're weakening both, and pitting both against each other. Much easier to divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 04:03 PM
7

I suppose they're implying that he became severely depressed over supposedly being an incel, and therefore stopped eating. Which is insane logic. "Incel" in thrown around alarmingly often by the SJW crowd.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 05:09 AM
1

It is necessary to be mindful, however, of how you're looking at the world.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:34 AM
10

I see your thinking has been poisoned by the hatred of Feminists. Not all women are Feminists, you know. Some are genuinely egalitarian.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:39 AM
13

Meaning that she's sane. Good to know.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:37 AM
60

"I don't think we should be pushing women into STEM fields." I think they cannot understand that all this means is: "Let women make their own fucking choices, instead of telling them how to live their lives."
/r/MensRights13/11/19 11:10 PM
3

It's such an outdated idea that men should foot the bill. And it's an idea that really shouldn't be compatible with feminism (although a lot of women pull of mental gymnastics to convince themselves it is). If women and men are equal, if women want to be independent and fearless and all of that, then how are we still casting men into the archaic role of provider? Because Feminism is also about the belief that Feminist women are entitled to anything they demand, because men are and / or were "opp…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:36 PM
2

So, what "health benefits" were those, then?
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:53 AM
12

Ah, good old Stockholm Syndrome. Stop trying to justify the fact that you were mutilated, just to make yourself feel better about a disgusting, dangerous practice.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:59 PM
7

Ah ~ that's not really "Communism". And no, I don't mean in a No-True-Scotsman sense. Fuck, I'm not sure what branch of what political philosophy that falls under, now I consider it... Maybe, Feminist Neo-marxism? They're one bizarre branch of Marxism... as in, they've taken Marx's basic concept of the economic class struggle of the wage-slave worker against their ultra-wealthy enslaver employers, and then twisted it completely out of recognition to resemble an idea of a class struggle of the op…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:30 PM
14

Not really ~ I see "communism" bandied about a lot, and I see a vague catch-all term that isn't clearly defined. "Communism" isn't a great evil, but a failed political philosophy that has failed, and never succeeded, because it never had life to begin with... Rather, I see the greed of Feminists as entitlement, sexism, equality-of-outcome. You could also call it a form of greedy Capitalism ~ self-absorbed greed for more than they deserve, in order to skip up the career ladder. Besides, I've ceas…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:11 PM
9

So they dropped the charges because she wasn’t there to testify? That doesn’t mean her charges were false. It certainly raises the question of why she didn't go to court, anyways. Which makes me lean towards him being possibly innocent.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 10:42 PM
7

Only the genuinely Privileged, the Female Supremacists, can get away with screaming "Patriarchy" while raping boys and men, or falsely accusing them of rape / sexual assault, and then getting away with it without having to provide any evidence for their claims.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 02:10 AM
3

Think about it. :)
/r/MensRights14/10/19 01:19 AM
2

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/221975997003-0-1/s-l1000.jpg
/r/MensRights14/10/19 01:06 AM
3

Having Autism doesn't make you an authority on the subject, nevermind on the personality of the kid in the OP. It doesn't mean that you know any more about the OP than we do.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 11:58 PM
2

That's some strong victimhood mentality you got going there. Autism isn't an excuse for having stupid opinions.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 11:29 PM
4

You have Autism? That's cool. Your stupid arguments can still be criticized, nevertheless.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:35 PM
18

You don't get it, do you? Kid's 5 years old, with Autism. You're expecting him to understand the concept of personal space...?
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:39 PM
4

Agreed... but at least they've shown that they have the rare gold nugget in a pile of steaming, stinking feces.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 06:47 AM
0

Because the globalists demand anarcho-tyranny.. I think you actually mean... tyranny imposed by Globalism? "Anarchism" implies no rule of government ~ of any sort: https://www.etymonline.com/word/anarchy
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 09:16 PM
5

Indeed. "Anarchism" itself implies no rule of government: https://www.etymonline.com/word/anarchy
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 09:14 PM
1

"How dare he show her that attacking him has consequences! She's supposed to be able to hit without retaliation, because she's a women, and men can't hit women!"
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:27 PM
6

Regardless, it doesn't give her the right to hit him ~ anymore than he has the right to hit her. That's equality ~ she needs to learn that if she lashes out, then she should expect consequences, like in the OP.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 07:24 PM
3

You know what? Feminists could care less about women's rights. Oh, sure, they raise that banner, and hide behind it, but it's a trojan horse, nothing more. The current problem is that women are getting their rights, while Feminists are actively preventing men from having theirs, because they're hateful, spiteful scum.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:26 AM
11

It accurately represents how Feminist women think about men, though.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:23 AM
9

According to insane Feminists who have zero understanding of male psychology.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:58 PM
3

If this is your idea of a "joke", no wonder mainstream comedy is dying. This is sexist garbage no-one finds funny, except disgusting misandrists.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:57 PM
2

And all you're doing is twisting my words, trying to play dumb. You know exactly what you wrote.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 05:41 PM
1

Your whole comment comes off as Feminist propaganda. There is no doubt men are more violent than women. Only if you listen to Feminist rhetoric. Men and women have equal potential for violence ~ it merely manifests differently. Men are more likely to be physically violent, while women are more likely to be emotionally violent. But what are men to do? It's biological and it exists because violence used to be a part of life and you wanted aggressive violent men in your tribe. Men were not just doi…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 05:33 PM
4

It's funny, because the most fragile ones are the ones most likely to be fragile in the first place. That, very easily triggered by anything they can use to abuse their political privileges.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 05:21 PM
35

Where does "but what about men?" come from? Gee, let me think... society is pandering towards women, and especially Feminist women, and then when men's social issues are ignored to pander to women, and men start asking, "but what about men?", the misandrist slime retort with "but what about women / women's right?", and proceed to make everything about them. Women used to have equal rights with men, but the Feminists are trying to de-level the playing field in favour of Feminists. Feminists could…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:55 PM
8

It's an extremely disgusting misandrist joke at that. It's easy to counter anyways ~ just ask her what she thinks about genital mutilation in girls in Muslim countries, and whether she'll listen to their "moaning". And whether she'd be happy with Muslim men telling them to shut and get on the table. They think it's funny to bash men, but then scream about sexism when the roles are reversed.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:58 AM
38

Women are innately submissive and have a subconscious genetic impulse to seek out strong men (who usually put women in their place). You don't respond to sexism from disgusting Feminists with sexism of your own. Don't fall to their level, otherwise you're no better than them.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:53 AM
13

What are you smoking? Black men are more oppressed by black women, than white men are by white women, according to this graph. There's no race-baiting going on here. It's merely to criticize sexism against men that is being justified by SJW-infested colleges.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:29 AM
10

The Feminist subs are the ones that would be banning her, simply because she posted here, and contradicted their narrative of "all men evil".
/r/MensRights30/09/19 11:36 AM
3

I think men are supposed to feel emotion but there are times that you push it aside for later and power forward instead of feeling depressed and not doing anything about it. The problem is, so many men do this, so often, that leads to it bottling up inside, more, and more, and more. And because no-one wants to listen, or help them unload, it just builds up to a critical mass of a mental breakdown. Men aren't invincible. While men are more apt to just bury their emotions, that's all the more reas…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:29 AM
3

Okay, then. What the fuck is a "REAL MAN", to you? An emotionless husk that isn't supposed feel anything? Men have the same range of emotions as women do, but not only express them differently, but also are taught by society that they don't matter. So, they get bottled up inside, until the man's mental stability crumbles. Swap the genders, and watch how fast the woman is supported and catered to. Society, today, often cares nothing for men, and expects men to "man up". Insanity.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:15 AM
15

Feminism was never about equality of the sexes. It claimed to be, but that was just the marketing pitch to draw in the clueless women. Feminism, in reality, was always being gaining special privileges. You want true equality? You're an egalitarian, not a Feminist.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 09:26 AM
-4

Should it be? Yes, if the woman is using physical violence. And in the case of violence, it should be video-taped, most preferably.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:51 AM
2

The outrageous thing is that if a man were to do the same thing during a play involving a woman, he would have been arrested, charged, and most likely, would have lost his job. Whereas this woman receives no punishment for her actions, adding to the pile of proof that, in the UK, women can get away with things that men cannot. Like women in the UK being able to avoid jailtime simply for having a vagina.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 08:05 AM
1

Worse, many of them are sexual predators themselves.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:43 AM
8

I'd say you are an equalitarian, an egalitarian ~ you're a female advocating for male rights, which should make that pretty clear. You want an equal, and fair, playing field for both males and females. Male Feminists are a most bizarre phenomena, because according to Feminism, males are, basically, the scum of the earth.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:11 PM
4

All women? All the time? You would make this accusation without evidence, just like Feminists do? Please don't fall to their level. Otherwise, you're no better than them. I hate Feminists and their false rape accusations as much as you do, but I can't believe that all women are like you say, simply because this minority of women, Feminists, these sick freaks, smear and destroy the lives of innocent men because they think it's funny, have a petty grudge, or had regret sex. Males and females being…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 06:58 AM
7

All this does is tarnish the reputations of women who put in the same amount of effort as men, because they actually cared about gaining the required skills.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:11 PM
3

"women" "females" No ~ it's Feminists who want to barge their way into these fields. Normal, sane women will put in the same amount of effort as a man will.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:09 PM
64

Yep. Victims of cult indoctrination, from an age where their intellectual critical filter isn't even developed, so tons of garbage crams into their helpless minds. The cult of female supremacy is all around them, horrifyingly.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:13 PM
3

Yeah, you're a Feminist. Please read just that one section, if you read anything at all on that page. The term "toxic masculinity wasn't created by feminists, it was created by the Mythopoetic men's movement in the 90's, and inspired by Carl Jung's ideas. Oh, I read it. The article claims that, but I see nothing explicit about it. I see "deep masculinity" and "mature masculinity", but no mention of "toxic masculinity". Your claims are bullshit, yet again. Yes, there are feminists that are toxic …
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:58 PM
1

I'm not twisting anything. You need to stop it with your persecution complex and see the facts objectively. You presume so much, lol. I have no "persecution complex" whatsoever. I wonder why you felt the need to accuse me with such bullshit? I merely see you misrepresenting my statements, and twisting them into me supposedly agreeing with you. Wrong. It was created by men and based on Carl Jung's ideas. There's nothing there whatsoever about it being based on Jung's ideas. What you posted is not…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:49 PM
5

You sound rather suspiciously like a Feminist apologist, pretending to be an MRA to push an agenda. In actuality, Feminism wishes to associate the idea of Masculinity with "toxicity", because they want to demonize males as a whole. When criticized, Feminists squirm and pretend that they're only criticizing the "toxic" parts of Masculinity, but when the mask is torn off, Feminists actually think that Masculinity is 100% "toxic" by definition. Feminists are the ones that are toxic ~ not because of…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:33 PM
1

You're twisting my words. Not cool. "Toxic Masculinity" and "Toxic Femininity" still do not exist, regardless of word-games surrounding them. They're fictions, and always will be. "Toxic Masculinity" was created solely as a sexist attack on males by a minority of women obsessed with victimhood status, and the power that comes with it. Feminism is toxic, however. Not because gender ~ but because of the sexist ideology surrounding it. Said ideology has nothing to do with female psychology or biolo…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:27 PM
3

Your logic doesn't make sense. There are bad behaviors that are universal, and there are bad behaviors that are gender specific. Addressing the universal ones are good, but addressing the gender specific behaviors is also needed. There are no negative behaviours that are gender-specific. They depend entirely on the individual's personality, and how that influences them to act according to different situations, not their sex. For example, women aren't generally told to "man up" when they face har…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:59 PM
3

Neither have ever existed. "Toxic Masculinity" is entirely a Feminist invention, used to attack and smear males, as a whole, as being, basically, "evil" by definition. It's a ridiculous concept that has no historical foundation. Equally, "Toxic Femininity" doesn't exist, either, being a sarcastic response by MRAs. However, some of us MRAs have taken it seriously, which is alarming to me, because that doesn't resolve anything.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 02:44 PM
6

Says the one playing word-games. "Toxicity" is neither a masculine nor feminine quality. That is, it isn't a quality that is typically associated with male or female human behaviour. "Toxic Masculinity" is a catch-all term that means anything that the Feminist conveniently wants it to mean, regarding males. When they're not being pretentious and deliberately vague, when they use the term to mean "all males are evil".
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:50 PM
8

Bullshit. Feminists love to play these kinds of word-games, so they can move the goalposts however it suits them. When Feminists say that "masculinity is toxic" they really do mean that "all males are evil".
/r/MensRights23/08/19 01:26 AM
6

This isn't an original Communist tenet in the context of Marx's own ideas. Again, these are tenets created by later philosophers taking his ideas, and then add their own twists to them, based on how they see the world. It's like an root idea that is taken by others, who add their own ideas on top. Like Catholic Christianity, and it's many branched-off denominations, or Buddhism, with it's various schools, or Islam, with their various ideologies. And so on. It's almost like branches of the same p…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:57 PM
9

"Identity politics" is not a tenet created by Marx. I don't think it was even remotely a concept back in his time. It's a tenet created by later philosophers who added their own spin to Marx's ideas, thus creating a new branch. The Frankfurt School was responsible, if I recall. They're classed as "neo-Marxist", as well.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:31 PM
5

You do realize that there are various different schools, branches, of Marxism that have different beliefs, and conflict and argue over those beliefs? Just saying "Marxism" is meaningless unless you're being more specific about what kind of Marxism you're discussing.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 09:57 PM
1

And often, they're probably taking psychiatric drugs, which can have horrifying side effects, such as causing the user to become suicidal.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:06 PM
1

Ah.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 05:51 PM
1

I'm not affected by such conditioning, so... their comment makes no sense to me, if directed at me.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 05:50 PM
1

What "conditioning", exactly?
/r/MensRights01/08/19 04:02 PM
46

To them, "toxic" also means being feminine. Remember, they consider "feminine" to mean being "weak". That is, they define masculinity as being "evil", and women are "oppressed" when they act feminine, or in the eyes of Feminists, "weak". Who benefits from this mad conflict between males and females? Only those who wish to crush the West into submission. Not just the West, either, but the entire world. Namely, the billionaire Globalists who literally want to rule the entire world, with everyone a…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 02:00 PM
1

By highlighting the humour of this scene, and how Hemsworth is going along with the joke, it just shows, starkly, how Feminists have no humour, nor do they understand the difference between sex appeal and actual objectification. To Feminists, humour is "rape".
/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:15 AM
24

It's funny, because Feminists perceive femininity to be a weakness. They hate both masculinity and femininity, overall. What the Feminists call "toxic masculinity" in the context of men, they call "female empowerment" in the context of women, making them raging hypocrites who really just want to dominate and maliciously destroy men for no justifiable reason other than self-centred greed, power, and control. Which is why they want men to become "feminine", that is, weak, passive, and easily domin…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:01 PM
1

Don't read many accounts from women talking about this do you? On social media, the Feminists are disgustingly vocal and hateful, even though they are a surprisingly small minority. If their man shows weakness, women hate it. You don't know this. You are making the mistake of taking the extremely vocal hatefulness of the Feminists on social media, and then extrapolating it to outside social media. Hell, even in the real world, Feminism is a minority position. The boogyman feminism. It enabled wo…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 03:18 AM
7

It isn't a fact whatsoever. Men are usually just better at not expressing their emotions outwardly. Even if a man seems outwardly emotionless, they can, inwardly, be just as emotionally unstable and emotional as a woman can be.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:02 AM
1

That's what you said. It sounds like you're describing how expectations are being put on men to be emotionless and stoic by feminist ideology. But then you say that men being stoic is a positive archetypal force and part of traditional masculinity, and it's being destroyed by feminists. It seems inconsistent, I don't get it. Hmmm. Okay, if that's how I come across, I need to clarify a bit more... Men naturally gravitate towards stoicism, majority of the time, but that doesn't mean men are emotio…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:16 PM
1

Agreed. And no, I don't expect us to 100% agree, as that's unrealistic. Different overall life circumstances and experiences, and such.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:00 PM
1

Just look on Twitter, at all the raging Feminists. It's the spreading of the idea that certain behaviours are "toxic masculinity", in order to attempt blackmail people into submission. Most often, they indoctrinate teenagers when they're in college, where they're vulnerable to figures of authority, who the teenagers expect to be honest and genuine. The Feminists abuse this in order to indoctrinate the teens with lies and bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:51 AM
1

You said she's been taught to think that men are that way by certain aspects of our society. That's a gender role. You can call it whatever you want, but according to the definition the rest of the world uses it's a gender role. I don't agree. There are certain traits found again and again in males and females that unmistakably biological. Psychoanalyst Carl Jung would describe the masculine and feminine as archetypal, as the core behaviours expressed by both are so undeniably common through all…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:48 AM
2

I understand what you're saying and I would completely agree except I don't believe the most common use of toxic masculinity is based in hatred of men and masculinity. That's where the entire idea originated from, however ~ man-hating Radical Feminists who define masculinity, and men, as "toxic". These Radical Feminists want to normalize the idea, to weaken, subvert, and destroy traditional masculinity, which has never been "toxic". No more than "toxic femininity". Also it doesn't refer to an ac…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:31 AM
2

Maybe I am failing to explain my position that well... but I'll try again. Please consider: The Radical Feminists coined the term "Toxic Masculinity", based on their sexist hatred of men. The concepts that it refers to, do not exist, and have never existed. They are concepts invented by unjustified hatred of males. The Feminists have claimed that masculinity is "toxic". They want the entire idea of masculinity to be seen as "toxic", which has never been true. The Feminists also perceive feminini…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:47 AM
1

The basis of them are formed from biological influences. The patterns are seen in men and women ~ the patterns seen when men and women are left to their own devices, without society influencing them too much. The same patterns observed today, are also observed in tribal cultures that haven't changed much over millennia.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:40 AM
1

It doesn't have anything to do with natural gender roles. If anything, it's more that she's been taught to think that way by the current state of society, which is ruled by Feminist ideology more often than not.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 07:15 AM
2

You don't know that all women would react like this. I suspect that it varies from culture to culture. In American and British culture, Feminism has infected the thinking of many women, and so they'll be more likely to react like this.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 05:43 AM
1

This has nothing to do with expectations of men acting a certain way. In psychology, behavioural traits determined to be "masculine" and "feminine" are those that have been observed to be behavioural patterns that men and women tend towards without any outside influences. Men majority tend towards masculine traits, and women, feminine traits. Said traits are not exclusive to either sex, however. In terms of psychology, "toxicity" is a marked deviation from the observed norms of how men and women…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 05:35 AM
0

Yes, and per these definitions, toxicity, as a concept, is neither masculine nor feminine. As, traditionally, toxicity is not a quality known in traditional behaviours of men or women. Toxicity is a minority trait that is neither masculine nor feminine in expression.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:51 PM
-4

Toxicity is neither feminine nor masculine. The word "masculine" isn't exclusive in defining men. Same for "feminine".
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:39 PM
19

This isn't "Femininity". It's just called being a senseless, heartless piece of trash. "Toxic Masculinity" doesn't exist, nor does "Toxic Femininity".
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:33 PM
34

we are teaching girls to be exactly what we accuse boys of being. The Feminists are doing this deliberately. They WANT a culture war, so they started one! And then they blame "the Patriarchy" for their scummy behaviour. They never take responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:04 PM
3

Good. You can't just let them push you around. If nothing else, and you seriously can't get an attorney despite any and all efforts, just stay the hell away from that hearing, as you'll lose whatever power you have left. Avoid them however possible. Do everything to move away from that area, as far as you can. These kind of scum will take your attendance as an admission of absolute, 100% guilt, and use it to make your life even worse than you currently think. This is how they think.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:41 AM
2

Because you can't afford it, I take it? Sometimes, you just to do what you can in order to afford one. Sacrifices are necessary, sometimes.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:03 AM
1

"She only hit me once" ~ Stockholm Syndrome in action. Funny ~ men are told to not hit women, but somehow, women can hit men all they like. The whole "violence against women, Australia says no" campaign completely ignores how women are enabled to hit their partners, and other people are indoctrinated to often automatically think that the man somehow deserved it. Feminist propaganda at work.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:03 AM
8

"Women"? As a whole? This is exactly what the Feminists want men to think. Worse, this is what the billionaire Globalists, deliberately manufacturing the conflict between men and women, want both to believe ~ that the other sex is bad and/or evil. So they decided to start with women, because women are easier to control and indoctrinate. Why? So that society is fractured and easier to control, where men and women cannot unite to stand up against them. Also, gradually ramped-up mass depopulation, …
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:36 PM
5

Lauren Chen = true, genuine woman She has a beautiful personality. If only the majority of women were as intelligent as she is... then they could have easily rejected the anti-male bullshit that they've been indoctrinated with.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 10:28 PM
19

Smells like projection, if she's not just an ignorant, cold-hearted bitch. There are a ridiculous amount of women out there who will play the victim for sympathy points. Also, just as equally, men who are abused often defend their abuser, give lots of detail, blame themselves, and question themselves. It's called Stockholm Syndrome, and affects men just as much as women. She claims that every post by men are just "laundry lists of abusive things". Yeah right. For both men and women, abusive acti…
/r/MensRights30/06/19 06:36 AM
3

This is genuine and wholesome. :3 I really enjoy reading about stuff showing that there are still excellent women, and sane men, out there with beautiful personalities, and who act as individuals, rather than mindless ideological clones. Gives me some hope for the world. :)
/r/MensRights27/06/19 10:35 PM
1

According to SJWs, anyways. They fell for 4chan's bait, lol. They do, every time. 4chan keeps creating these memes, because they know that the Regressive Leftists each this shit up like no tomorrow. Clown world, indeed, LOL! XD
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:23 PM
1

Ah. Makes sense. Well, not all Socialists or Communists are SJWs, so I can take that small comfort...
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:36 PM
2

I didn't realize, lol. Were you trolling me...?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:21 AM
2

Wait... you're trolling me, aren't you...?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:20 AM
2

Says the one who sounds like a blindly indoctrinated SJW.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:18 AM
2

It's hilarious how you SJWs think that this is "white supremacy". In your logic, if you see "white supremacy" everywhere, you aren't a white supremacist. But, if you don't see "white supremacy" everywhere, you are a "white supremacist".
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:08 AM
2

They're not even pretending, lol. They're merely mocking and making a joke out of the SJWs who claim to see "white supremacy" everywhere.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:00 AM
2

lol
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:54 PM
2

You seem to think I'm angry... You're projecting, as I'm far from angry. I'm just amused, that's all.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:33 PM
2

You know why that was made? Because of all the anti-white statements that have been made over time, some of them even demanding to bring back segregation. They literally hate white people, and want them to be exiled, basically. Basically, it's a meme highlighting this bullshit. The so-called "People of Colour" want a space separate from white and asian people. If that's what they want, then let them. The sane black and brown people will choose to remain working with white and asian people, becau…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:18 PM
2

Says the person trying to defend Feminist SJWs on an anti-Feminist sub.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 10:14 PM
2

Why so angry?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 10:08 PM
2

Evidence that it's anything more than a meme-fest, or laughing at SJW insanity?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:40 PM
1

But, it's not. It's mocking people who "white supremacy" everywhere, when there isn't.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:10 PM
2

You sound like one hell of a misandrist arsehole. Can you Feminists stop bugging us?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:03 PM
1

If you think that any of those are "dog whistles" for white supremacy, I do NOT want whatever you're smoking. Figures that you're an SJW who sees white supremacy everywhere that doesn't toe the line of the SJW narrative.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 07:59 PM
4

Is this sarcasm...? I've browsed through more than a dozen posts, and it's just memes and poking fun at the insanity of SJWs.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 06:07 PM
9

The SJWs wish, lol.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 05:12 PM
6

That subreddit is just another meme sub, to mock the SJWs.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 05:11 PM
17

This goes back ages. The SJW crowd tried to infiltrate 4chan, and turn it into another mindless propaganda outlet. They failed, as 4chan said NO, and booted them out. The SJWs have dearly hated 4chan ever since. 4chan has been mocking them ever since, too. The SJWs are so damn malicious, and believe that it's their "right" to infiltrate everything, and subvert everything, because of "the Patriarchy", and then attempt to use those things to indoctrinate more people. Basically, the SJW mindset is …
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:27 PM
33

4chan, who are fed up with the culture war the SJW Feminist's are waging. They've resorting to mocking the insanity of said of crowd, by creating memes, and then seeing how long they can take until the SJWs think that they're somehow codewords for white supremacy, and shit like that. 4chan is fucking amazing with some of the memes they can pump out.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:38 PM
10

It's not so much an insult, such as heavily mocking ridiculous logic and reasoning. Of course, the person it's directed at can perceive it as an insult.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:36 PM
4

Do you even read, bro...? All it literally stated is "no dad at home". Many ways this could be interpreted without further context. Like, they could be working so damn much, for instance, that they're basically never home.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 12:29 AM
23

Judge Judy, an actual strong, independent woman. :)
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:26 PM
3

You might want to put an /s next to it, lol. Sarcasm isn't always obvious on the internet.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 10:59 AM
40

Circumcision IS mutilation, however.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 03:57 PM
4

Well, the indoctrinated and/or Feminists do, yeah.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 03:14 PM
25

Toxicity is neither feminine nor masculine. Toxicity is found in members of both sexes, and depends wholly on their individual personalities.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:28 PM
2

You don't know until you realize maybe you don't know. :) Mistakes are made, lessons are learned. That's what makes life fun. :)
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:51 AM
3

Women haven't been treated badly for "thousands of years". Judaism? Christianity? Islam? Sure. Other cultures and religions? Very much not true. In tribal societies, which make up the majority of human history, women were the ones who bound the tribe together, and treated with respect.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 08:54 AM
3

Women have been treated like shit for most of human history. Not true. It varies dramatically by culture, and religion. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam don't represent the world, even though they were pretty damn repressive. Europe's history doesn't represent the whole world, either. Women got most of their liberation from Christianity when the Enlightenment flourished in the 16/17th century. In tribal cultures, women and men had their respective functions ~ men were the warriors, hunters, prot…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 07:14 AM
5

Revenge? Against what? Delusions planted into their minds via indoctrination that all men are evil.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:50 PM
27

Why should their gender matter? We should ideally have no journalists being killed, nor anyone being homeless, regardless of gender. Women are being highlighted because of Feminist politics. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:16 AM
18

Do the strenuous work, get the extra pay. The greedy Feminists want the extra pay, without having to do the extra work. Basically, Feminists are pigs who want more for less effort.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:15 AM
22

Seems like a few people didn't read past your first sentence, lol.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 09:48 PM
1

Seems like it, lol. Also... nice frogs. Where have I seen those, lol. 🐸
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:22 AM
9

And that still makes it a colour.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:40 AM
27

Yep, because White and Yellow are colours. Really, when these SJWs say "Person of Colour", it's a dog-whistle for their anti-light-skinned racists bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:33 AM
2

Feminism isn't even feminine to any degree. Indeed, female Feminists see femininity as a weakness. They're the very embodiment of what they believe about "toxic masculinity", which they believe is real, when it isn't. They're a bunch of mentally ill, spoiled, rotten brats who were never taught any self of respect for themselves or other, nor discipline or self-discipline. Masculinity and femininity are gender traits. Males may usually be more masculine, and females more feminine, but these are g…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 03:00 AM
3

Exactly. But, I see some sliding, alarmingly, into thinking that they're both real. Feminism ruins not only the thinking of Feminists, but also those that resist them. We need to avoid becoming like them. As Nietzsche said: "Whoever fights with monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster in the process. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you."
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:25 PM
2

Except that this is as real as "toxic masculinity" ~ meaning, it's not. Masculinity and femininity cannot be "toxic". Feminism is toxic, however, and does indoctrinate both sexes ~ with women being "masculine" and men being "feminine". Feminists understand neither masculinity and femininity.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:22 PM
2

Good points. It would be better to say that some rapists use rape as a means of power-tripping.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:19 PM
11

A reminder ~ "toxic femininity" isn't real, much like "toxic masculinity". Rape is neither a feminine nor masculine action ~ it is an example of disgusting power-tripping.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:22 AM
1

As I said, keep it up. :) You're doing great! As in, shit.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 10:55 PM
0

And now all you're doing is flinging shit around, hoping some of it sticks to the wall. It's all falling off, so far. Keep it up. :)
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:41 PM
2

Well... men ARE being victimized by these disgusting Feminists who play the victim. They claim to be oppressed, all while they oppress men very overtly. When these Feminist crush men's rights, it can lead to feeling extremely powerless, which is exactly what the Feminists want. No wonder there are "whiners". Sometimes, the boiling frustration is justified, and needs to be released, lest the pressure cooker explodes.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:38 PM
4

Good stuff ~ using their insanity against them. :)
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:35 PM
2

And you sound more and more like a brigading Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:34 PM
6

The female could so easily just accuse them of sexual harassment, and then sue them. Yet when these disgusting Feminists do it, they'd get let of the hook with "oh, but they enjoyed it"
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:00 PM
7

This is an issue. This disgusting female believes that she has the right to do something, that if a male did the same equivalent thing, he'd be going to court.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:54 PM
2

Well, considering that there are many nutty Christians who think that Jews somehow, without evidence, control everything, I don't blame you. The Globalists are happy to hide behind any kind of protection, so that people don't realize that they're the ones causing the majority of the world's problems, so that all of us are easier to control. If we fight each other, they remain in the shadows. Radical Feminism is most certainly part of their agenda, as it destabilizes society. The Feminists don't …
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:52 PM
10

I don't define them by any kind of religion. For me, the term refers to insanely greedy billionaires who want to control the world. Their religion matters not, because that's not what binds them together. It's their goal of world domination that binds them together. There might be Jewish Globalists, but there are also Christian Globalists, Islamic Globalists, Buddhist Globalists, Hindu Globalists, etc. The Globalists themselves hide behind the idea that the term "Globalist" is somehow a dog-whis…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:09 PM
27

"lesson to show them what it's like for women" Except that basically none of these Feminists have ever experienced any of the things they punish the boys with, so that's a complete lie on their part. No, rather, they're been indoctrinated to hate men, and indoctrinated to believe that, therefore, men deserve anything they do them, even if grossly undeserved. Gender war? Exactly what the likes of George Soros and the other Globalists want.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:29 PM
26

A myth, much like toxic masculinity. These Feminists are neither feminine nor masculine. They're mentally ill children who scream and throw tantrums when told they can't have play time.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 08:51 PM
1

So when I quote the heads of intelligence agencies to prove that the heads of intelligence agencies believe Russia interfered with the US election, you see that irrefutable proof as a "talking point?" Because the intelligence agencies are all fucking liars? They lie about so much shit it's not remotely funny. Looks like Russian trolls have infiltrated men's rights. No-one hear is a "Russian troll". You sound thoroughly indoctrinated by US intelligence agency propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 02:15 PM
0

Not at all. Just because Trump appointed him, doesn't mean that he won't attack Trump if it benefits him in some way. Politicians love backstabbing each other.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:07 AM
1

All you have is talking points. That's all you Democrats have ~ because why hasn't anything been done to Trump yet, if he's really guilty? What you people do is twist things completely out-of-context whenever it suits your agenda of Trump-bashing and Russia-bashing. The absurdity of your words speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:06 AM
1

Seriousposting that the Mueller report exonerates Trump. Exonerates? There was never evidence of wrongdoing in the first place, by Trump or Russia, except in the minds of insane Democrats who are extremely salty that their candidate lost.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:32 PM
1

Imagine unironically believing this. Imagine unironically making this absurd comment.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:30 PM
2

Indeed, lol.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:00 PM
1

Firstly, politics is a completely separate thing to men's rights. The Men's Rights movement is a political counter-culture to the insanity of Feminism. Feminism has a lot of political power these days ~ all of the fringe SJW ideologies do. A minority of people with very loud voices.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:41 PM
0

Projection, is what this is. :)
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:37 PM
4

Maybe I'd wear a shirt? I live in Australia, and it sucks here, so... "Make Australia Great Again" would be an interesting take to confuse people with, lol.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:29 PM
7

Being a Trump supporter doesn't make you a racist or misogynist. Few Trump supporters are either, because they'd get destroyed in today's culture. Like, obliterated. There are plenty of Democrat-supporters who're racist towards white people, and sexist/misandrist towards men, though. And they get zero punishment.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:24 PM
3

MOFA hats would be popular. :)
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:22 PM
3

We have presented proof which is exactly why multiple Russian agents have been indicted, you can bury your head in the sand if you want but those are facts. That's still not proof of any Russian election meddling. The US has not presented any evidence or proof of Russian meddling ~ only continuous unsubstantiated claims. The US does lots of shit without requiring evidence, let alone proof. This is just another link in the chain. I just explained this to you, we cannot confirm the Tump campaign w…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:42 PM
2

The FBI has confirmed multiple times that Russia did interfere in the elections No, they haven't. They haven't confirmed shit. Otherwise, why hasn't Trump been impeached? Because there's really nothing there. it's pretty much irrefutable. Yeah, nah. Your logic sucks. If there were widespread proof, it would be irrefutable. But, there's never yet been any proof, despite the years of claims about it without anything being presented as proof of Russia doing anything. What we can't confirm is that t…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:13 PM
2

If there was actual proof, we would know by now. And there very probably isn't.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:09 PM
4

Trump seems transparent. It's a style thing. Doesn't seem like it to me. Trump is just a newbie when it comes to being a politician. He's a businessman, and that's what he understands. He's trying to be a politician, but doesn't seem to understand it that well. He's no different than the rest, just a better, braver liar. Nah. Trump's transparent, because he's an idiot in terms of politics. He's also not a very good liar. Sometimes, I don't think he even tries. People like his boldness. Most poli…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:03 AM
5

It does when the people supporting him use that expression and he is 100% behind them with support of it. Evidence? And no ones exaggerated, he's more stupid than evil, he can't even make a decision without lying about calling big daddy Putin Yeah, this is blatant bullshit. There's never been a single shred of actual, solid proof that Putin any control over Trump. All we've really had, in terms of solid proof, is that the Democrats have been screaming about it for years. Even the Mueller Report …
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:58 AM
2

Trump is simply the least shitty out of all the current choices the US public are given. And he's more transparent than the other choices, too. He speaks his mind, whether that offends people or not, and I find that better than any of the previous presidents over the past few decades. Shitty, but transparent, is better than blatantly corrupt and scummy.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:04 AM
7

It's insane that people like you think that Trump is literally Hitler, when Trump acts nothing like that.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:59 AM
11

Doesn't make MAGA hats a bad thing. Do some racist and/or bigoted and/or homophobic people wear them? Sure. They're a minority, though. The SJWs look at these people, and claim that this minority are representative of MAGA hats. Why? Because it furthers their agenda of insane Trump hatred. In reality, Trump has supporters on the Left and Right: https://youtu.be/bMipM3RE2UA?t=36 Is Trump an asshole? Sure. Doesn't make him the evil overlord they're exaggerating him to be.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:01 AM
1

Microdosing isn't the same as tripping.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:20 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 04:37 PM
1

I'm open to different perspectives, as long as they're well-argued and clearly defined.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 04:37 PM
17

Narcissism, you mean. Big difference between this, and genuine self-love. Narcissism involves self-hatred, which is then always projected onto other people.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:10 AM
11

There's plenty of research on the benefits of microdosing Psilocybin by researchers.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:05 PM
47

Exactly. Microdosing is excellent for overall mental health.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 03:16 PM
3

Psilocybin is far different to alcohol. Psilocybin is excellent for depression ~ when used with respect and with careful judgement.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 03:14 PM
17

Maybe she'd like to (involuntarily) volunteer to be spayed, and have her eggs stored? Sounds fair.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 08:10 AM
28

Because the Feminist conception of a "toxic white male patriarchy oppressing women" doesn't exist in any sense. The same Feminist who spout this garbage also have incredible amounts of privilege. They play the helpless victim when it suits them, so they can abuse their privileges even further.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:05 AM
4

Not necessarily. Hate mobs willing to destroy an innocent person will use this tactic to fool people ~ the belief that if so many seemingly come forward, it must be true in part, right? In reality, all of them could be liars conspiring with each other.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 07:25 AM
19

All they do is look at our genitals to determine our gender. At least, that's what they used to do before the insane, delusional Gender Dysphorics gained political power.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:40 AM
1

Erecting a desperate strawman, I see. Look in a mirror. :)
/r/MensRights17/04/19 03:09 AM
1

Irrelevant. What's relevant is that Soy phytoestrogens are a lot stronger, and more toxic, than those found in other plants. Before the modern era, even though China and Japan ate Soy, they ate a lot less than is eaten today in the West, so they didn't suffer any negative effects.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:13 PM
0

Bah, no, I could defend it. I just don't see any point wasting my precious energy on you people, when you'll ignore it all in favour of your Vegan ideology. I've only ever seen Vegans defend Soy so fervently, because it's the only meaningful alternative you have to meat. And it's a shitty alternative at that.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:23 PM
3

Fuck right off with your Vegan propaganda. Soy's phytoestrogens are worse than any of the other kinds.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:52 AM
-1

It's too much Soy that's the issue. The small amounts in the traditional Chinese and Japanese diets were not dangerous. The amounts used in modern times are.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:52 AM
-7

How do you know they haven't? Or are you just going to pretend that Price is the only one who studied it? I'm too tired right now to do your research for you. Not like you wouldn't move the goalposts, regardless, with the agenda you seem to have with defending Soy so vigourously. Just go and eat your Soy, I suppose, if it makes you happy.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:50 AM
-8

Fuck off your bullshit. Weston Price knew far more about nutrition than others of his time, because he went around the world studying native cultural diets and their impact on health. You sound like a Vegan brigading to defend Soy's toxicity.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:39 AM
-3

Bad analogy. Isoflavones mimic estrogen far more than any other phytoestrogens. The body basically thinks it's estrogen.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:35 AM
3

Seems like the Radical Vegans have invaded this thread, lol.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:33 AM
0

Keep telling yourself that. Isoflavone phytoestrogens are far-and-away worse than the rest, especially those found in soy.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:33 AM
-4

The isoflavone phytoestrogens found in soy are the real problem: https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/soy-alert/soy-isoflavones-panacea-or-poison/ https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/soy-alert/dangers-of-dietary-isoflavones-at-levels-above-those-found-in-traditional-diets/
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:21 AM
-5

It's not the same logic at all.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:16 AM
-16

They mimic estrogen, however. They act very similarly.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:00 AM
56

Women already have equal rights with men. At this point, women simply have additional, exclusive privileges men don't have, thanks to disgusting Feminists and their blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:09 PM
8

Ah, classic Whataboutism due to Feminist propaganda. "Men's rights issues? But whatabout women's rights issues?????"
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:35 PM
13

Non-Feminist women might care, but the Feminists work to indoctrinate other women into also not caring.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 02:26 PM
12

Patriarchy? More like, a Toxic Matriarchy perpetrated by psychopaths. Nothing feminine nor masculine about these cowardly monsters.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:07 PM
3

It's because of the difference between glucose and fructose/sucrose. Fructose/sucrose is the nightmare that is the cause of insulin resistance, heart disease, even causing liver disease similarly to alcohol. Glucose can cause obesity, but doesn't cause insulin resistance, heart disease or liver disease. The Sumo wrestlers consume purely glucose, which is why they remain healthy. This is due to the drastically different way that fructose and glucose are processed in the liver. An excellent docume…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:06 PM
11

There is not a single instance where being fat is healthy or beautiful. Sole exception ~ Japanese sumo wrestlers. At least they have a very special diet that keeps them healthy.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:32 PM
22

I love the overflowing sarcasm of this post chain! :D Because if Masculinity is "toxic", then it's only right that Femininity is, also. Obviously, to sane people, they're not, but if Feminists want to play their absurd, sexist games, then they need a mirror shoved in their face.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 11:13 AM
3

Sounds like something similar.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 11:10 AM
44

Holy shit ~ I'm no fan of Christian nutjobs, but this quote is surprisingly sane. (Ignoring Pat's underlying connotations for some of the words he uses.)
/r/MensRights06/04/19 04:35 AM
4

/r/punchablefaces
/r/MensRights04/04/19 05:28 AM
18

Once, humanity's gynocentrism was balanced ~ that is, women took care of the social side of the village / tribe, while men acted as the warriors. Both led and taught the youngsters and yet-to-come-of-age various things, so that they could find their place. They were a group, but a group of individuals working together to make sure their small society was happy and healthy. This kind of society is my dream, because it worked so damn well for so damn long. The age of kingdoms only created corrupti…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 01:16 AM
72

On legal advice, the man had pleaded guilty to two counts of domestic violence This is so fucked up. What pieces-of-shit gave him this wonderful advice to incriminate himself when he was innocent???
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:14 AM
1

Ah, thanks. I somehow missed that. :/
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:16 AM
7

That's a lie spread by Feminists who loathe men and hate the portion of gamer culture which is actually sane.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 08:23 AM
1

So... you're saying that this very sub you're on, isn't? I think your statement didn't come out right, lol. Besides, /r/KotakuInAction2 and /r/SocialJusticeInAction are all pretty anti-Feminist. They're not very fond of the SJWs who are all about the pretense of being about justice to stroke their fragile egos. Fragile, because they constantly demand validation.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 08:22 AM
10

When you say that buzzword, it's so obvious what camp you're in. It's like... a calling card, lol. If anyone is an involuntary celibate, it's the Feminists who want the D due to their hormonal drive, but hate men so damn much that they can't really get any. Men are increasingly becoming voluntary celibates due to being afraid of being hit with false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 08:18 AM
3

You're misunderstanding. I wasn't referring to the woman in the OP specifically, but in general. I never stated that she falsely accused anyone. She simply misidentified someone, and that someone's attempts to prove that they were innocent were blatantly ignored by the police.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 09:09 AM
4

Notice the other choice I offered ~ misidentification. Don't blindly believe someone, because they might make a mistake. Assuming there's no malice, obviously, which there doesn't seem to have been. Nevertheless, an innocent man shouldn't suffer because of a misidentification. The fact that the persecutors didn't check to make sure he was actually innocent ~ the persecutors would be the malicious ones here, not the woman.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:29 AM
5

I didn't say that she framed him. Read again.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:17 AM
10

No ~ rather, the implication is that we shouldn't just blindly believe, because the woman might be malicious or simply misidentify the person.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 12:45 AM
4

Another example of their projection of their own infantile, childish attitudes. I guess they think everyone is like them, but far worse, or something.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 11:33 PM
3

Nothing feminine about these trashy Feminists. They see being feminine as a weakness. Feminists want to be "strong", but they just come across as childish and immature, because they don't understand what being Masculine is truly about.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 10:28 PM
1

And you seem to be overreacting.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:11 AM
1

Says the person projecting their bullshit onto me. Seriously, please examine your words and statements, because you sound like a very angry person.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:09 PM
1

Stop projecting your own issues onto me, lol. I wonder who the incel is...? You SJWs are, considering you lot LOVE throwing around that catchphrase. It's kind of your group's calling card, it seems. Can't you be, like, more inventive...?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:15 AM
1

Stop it with the useless blackmail, lol. It's not like he deliberately and consciously decided to be biased against women. Or other groups. When the same process and pattern fails a few times, you don't become so eager to keep repeating it, because you subconsciously associate it with failure.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:54 PM
12

It's not their fault, however. Being burned more than a few times will naturally make you more cautious. And when you're assumptions are proven incorrect by someone actually competent, it's a welcome relief.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:55 AM
9

Just stating the obvious out of sheer annoyance, but whatever ~ if white males really have unlimited privilege and power, why is fine for them to be trashed, attacked, fired from jobs, etc? Can't they just, you know, assert their unlimited privilege and power to nullify these things, if they really exist? It's so damn obvious to the sane person that white males are increasingly being belittled, bullied, minimized, sidelined, in a world consumed by SJW insanity. White males have little power to f…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:29 PM
38

Sexism is more prominent in this case. Racism is just the cherry-turd on the turd-cake.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:25 PM
3

No, you misunderstand ~ the OP is satire, yes. But ~ these Feminists bully their way into the STEM field by playing the oppressed and discriminated woman, which is bullshit, but it works for them.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:28 AM
1

None of this excuses her anti-male, sexist history of commentary. It's an attempt at apologetics.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:28 PM
1

That's the point. The movie would have been okay, IF it weren't for the shoddy marketing. Brie could have chosen a far better way to deal with people asking why she wasn't smiling, and then, it wouldn't have received such a bad reputation. Besides, many have commented that Larson feels miscast for the role of Captain Marvel. Probably because they were expecting Captain Marvel to be closer to the comic version, much like every other character in the other films were.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:26 PM
1

It can't have been only because Larson was in it. It all began after people were annoyed that she wasn't smiling in the first trailer, and instead of explaining why she wasn't smiling, or taking the critique as useful feedback, Larson decided to lose her shit. It all went downhill from there. And neither Disney nor Marvel reigned her in fast enough before the damage was done. Once they reeled her in, too late, they started their ridiculous damage control.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:00 PM
1

Disney and Marvel were trying to protect their precious movie after their disastrous marketing campaign, along with Brie Larson just adding fuel to flames. If they had done neither, and had been honest about the content of the film in the trailers, no-one would have been upset by the movie. It would have been merely another Black Panther ~ okay, but nothing outstanding. The only reason to make these algorithm changes for a certain movie is because they want to crush dissentment and rightful crit…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:57 PM
1

Really? Where?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:58 PM
20

Amusing, though, in the way it highlights how these Feminists view themselves. By their standards, they're "oppressed" by definition, with men being "oppressors" by definition. Which that insane logic, they can't lose.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:47 PM
6

Indeed. Now, if they made Scarlet Witch the new face of the MCU, supported by Black Widow, Spiderman, Thor, etc, I'd have literally no qualms. She'd be a perfect candidate, due to her potential. Black Widow has a lot more overall experience, even if merely a badass human, so even if Scarlet Witch needed time to grow into the role, Black Widow could act in Cap's stead for a while quite easily. The Feminists wouldn't be happy with them, because they have character flaws and / or tragic pasts, yet …
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:24 PM
1

You know, I started out with Infinity War, due to the hype. Watched it, didn't understand the character backstories, so watched previous films. Then things I didn't understand before clicked.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:09 PM
14

Look at that Metascore vs User Score. The difference in opinion is huge.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 02:07 PM
6

Bullshit ~ if she weren't being sexist trash, she could have simply stated "it's for children, not for adults". But, no, she had to attack 40-year-old white men, in particular. There's no defending her ageist, racist, sexist statement.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:51 AM
5

Yes. But just because that's true, doesn't mean that's exactly what happened. Perhaps, but it's the best explanation to fit the madness. The general public likes formulaic garbage. The movie is the epitome of formulaic garbage... Just like with most MCU movies. This shouldn't be a surprise for you. Most? Heh. Half of the MCU films aren't "formulaic garbage". This movie is, indeed, formulaic garbage, but with Feminist undertones. You dumb shit... OP implied that the movie isn't doing well. It's a…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:46 AM
6

So it's impossible that they removed bots? Anyone they don't want to have an opinion can be easily labelled as a "bot", and have their review, comment, etc, vanished. Too easy. It's impossible that the movie is getting good reviews, even though Cinemascore (which is people's opinions directly after watching the movie) is still A? Cinemascore isn't immune from trolling by the Feminist SJWs. There's no way in a sane world that this movie deserves an A. Maybe a B- or something. Some of you people a…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:54 AM
3

Data from here: https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/captain_marvel
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:52 AM
61

Claims of "review bombing" are one thing, and then there's this blatant show of corruption: https://old.reddit.com/r/SocialJusticeInAction/comments/az33g7/rottentomatoes_captain_marvel_audience_score/ They're not deleting "bots" ~ they're fucking with the score to get a desired result.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:48 AM
5

Lying? Who's lying? https://old.reddit.com/r/SocialJusticeInAction/comments/az33g7/rottentomatoes_captain_marvel_audience_score/ Right, Rotten Tomatoes and their shill supporters are.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:48 AM
19

"Bots" are a convenient excuse to censor legitimate reviews, while the SJW bot reviews are probably all still there. Like, look at this ~ https://old.reddit.com/r/SocialJusticeInAction/comments/az33g7/rottentomatoes_captain_marvel_audience_score/ ~ and tell me that they were only removing "bots". No, they were cooking and forging reviews so that they could artificially pump up the score.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:46 AM
23

They use whatever words have the most emotional and political weight, that they know will grab attention. Psychopaths / sociopaths / narcissists are like this.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:20 AM
11

On top of everything else mentioned here, it's a form of projection ~ I'm not entirely how, in this case, but I've noticed with SJWs, being then extremely insecure, extremely emotional crazies that they are, always resort to projection of their own faults onto others. I bet, if he were still alive today, Carl Jung would have a field day with deconstructing their insanity, but he'd probably get hit with a false rape claim, and promptly thrown into prison, no questions asked.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:18 AM
2

Infinity War? Every scene was... perfect. So well done.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 07:38 PM
10

I'm beginning to hate the "female empowerment" dogwhistle. Thank so damn much, you man-hating Feminist scum! Sane women also hate you, but, of course, they suffer from "internalized misogyny".
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:16 PM
3

Some of the Marvel movies are adapted pretty closely from some of the comics, and performed pretty damn well. Civil War is one of those are done superbly.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 12:17 PM
12

So they can infiltrate these fields under the guise of "equality". Once "equality" is achieved, they start sidelining men more and more, until men have little power. The company suitably starts tanking due to bleeding talent.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 11:28 AM
6

Wasn't #MeToo created by the Feminist SJW crowd initially to attack and smear Trump, whom the extreme Left hate so strongly? It's funny how, with #MeToo, when it's... convenient, the false accusers just pop out of the woodwork, ready to destroy. From there, it's been used as a weapon against any and every innocent man that the extreme Left hate, from Assange, to Kavanaugh,to Trump, to various celebrities, like Vic Mignogna. So, if anything, #MeToo's message is about false sexual accusations used…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:31 PM
188

Indeed, it doesn't take much to realize that malicious and abusive piece-of-shit women, who make false sexual accusations, depend on people believing that they're rare. That way, they can keep abusing these privileges as much as they want, because #BelieveWahman and #MeToo.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 01:25 PM
13

Yes, it's a site-wide change ~ and it's something they did because a Feminist propaganda film was being torn to shreds, and only because Larson stated that she wasn't keen on white men seeing her precious movie. Therefore, people did as she asked ~ and went on Rotten Tomatoes to say they weren't going to see the movie. All because Larson can't stop attacking and belittling white men.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 04:18 PM
10

Because they know that they aren't being oppressed, but pretend that they are, in order to have power over those they hate, as well as gaining privileges they haven't earned, but greedily desire anyway.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:17 AM
2

This is such blatant bullshit. I know this is a lie from direct experience. I was sexually abused as a child, and through too much eager meditation 5 years ago from present, I accidentally reawoke repressed memories of the trauma, and it royally fucked me up for almost 3 years. I was crushingly depressed for that period, and was just... numb. I've since recovered somewhat, but no doubt there are still effects from it I'm not fully aware of.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:12 AM
2

If it's a parody, it's in very poor taste, because it doubles as a celebration of violence used against him, when he was merely being an annoying pest. Fight words with words ~ not physical assault.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 11:35 PM
1

That's not a compliment, lol.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 11:33 PM
1

Doesn't read like it to me.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 11:32 PM
2

Where'd you find what was on his shirt? That's the final missing factor here.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:32 AM
3

You fight words with words. You don't fight words with physical weapons.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:16 AM
5

GOOD! Exactly what I wanted to hear. Best outcome of a nasty scenario. :)
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:12 AM
6

The violence is not being celebrated. "He wasn't wearing a helmet. He obviously wanted it." Yes, it is. They are turning his argument on him. By physically assaulting him? When he hadn't actually assaulted anyone? If they really wanted to turn his arguement back upon him, it would be with words, not physical violence. But I'm starting to think that you don't have the capacity to understand that. What YOU cannot seem to grasp is that justifying rape with a sign is not equal to actually getting at…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:12 AM
9

Eh, fair enough. At least society can judge him as a man with a trashy, nasty opinion.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:07 AM
5

Justifying violence, namely, rape? That's not fine, but neither is he committing any tangible violence. No-one is being physically hurt by him ~ only rightfully outraged. The outrage is justifiable. What is wrong here is that a woman actually assaults him disproportionately, and then said actual violence is celebrated. He didn't deserve violence against him, even if he advocated for it. Understand?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:51 AM
4

It's the first time I've seen it so bad in a single thread. I mean, what if we reversed the roles? Feminist female preacher holds sign saying "you deserve to be raped" about men, and a man bashes her in the head with a baseball bat. I wonder what the Feminists would say. I bet they'd 100% defend the sign fervently, and the man would be sent to jail with a long sentence.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:42 AM
7

You're getting downvoted by the brigaders, even though your statement is entirely rational.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:37 AM
4

An opinion doesn't mean that people will automatically listen, agree, and do as he says. The sign-holder deserves to be charged ~ not bashed over the fucking head, and almost possibly murdered.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:36 AM
7

This thread is being brigaded hardcore. Never seen it here, before now. I guess the Feminazis are really, really off their rockers today.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:35 AM
2

No, he shouldn't. He should be charged, not physically attacked.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:33 AM
6

Not at all ~ he was wielding a sign with a trashy message. It's fucked, but it doesn't deserve a baseball bat to the head, for fuck's sake. I hope the woman was charged for grievous bodily harm, because she could have killed him. But, because she's a woman, no doubt she'll get lessened to no charges.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:32 AM
1

His shirt? What did it even say? Advocation? No ~ this is a celebration of violence against a non-violent arsehole preacher. I know what the context is, and you're trying to twist it.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:30 AM
4

Oh, I don't have to do anything. You words speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:25 AM
6

So... physically assaulting him in a dangerously harmful way is somehow equivalent to holding a sign with a ridiculous idea? Stop brigading and go back to r/Feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:44 AM
4

This isn't remotely a joke, lol. This is a celebration of violence against someone who wasn't being violent.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:41 AM
3

Sounds exactly like a Feminist, then. That's what they're all about ~ hating, except when they can suck blood.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 11:16 PM
14

Exactly ~ 99% of Feminists loathe men. I feel sorry for those women who have been sucked into the bullshit about believing that Feminism is about equality and that not all Feminists are man-haters, when said women don't think like Feminists do.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 07:45 PM
2

Trans, gender dysphoria, may be a mental illness, but please don't call them "abominations". It has nothing to do with being gay, either. Gender dysphoria isn't a sexual orientation. They're human, like you, but are going through immense psychological distress. Rather than being healed, it is only encouraged... which just makes it worse. They then devolve into becoming SJWs, oftentimes, because they're brainwashed into believing that society hates them and oppresses them. These SJWs, feminist, t…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:03 PM
46

"It is hard to read an article like this and avoid the conclusion that we live in a culture that hates women. Just hates us. [...] Boys and men in this society are raised to see women as not just less than them, but in some cases as less than human". Wow ~ what a complete inversion of reality!
/r/MensRights25/01/19 06:26 PM
5

Because men and women process things differently, they are inherently ill-equipped to teach a member of the opposite sex how to handle things in an appropriate way. I agree and disagree. Both boys and girls need a balanced perspective from both the adult male and females. Both can teach ideas that either sex alone cannot fully do. Because males have an inner feminine energy, and females, the opposite. The male and female cannot exist in a balanced fashion without proper complimentary energies. T…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:40 AM
4

Problem with that logic is, the former can unfairly taken out of context and framed as the latter by anyone who hates that individual white man, or even white men as a whole. Especially if they're in a position of power they can abuse. Where do you draw the line, and determine what is, and isn't, a hate crime? Who defines what is, and isn't, a hate crime, and how?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:33 AM
2

Then stop belittling the OP without evidence.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 04:14 AM
2

Evidence that this is a random "creepypasta"?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 04:03 AM
7

What the fuck is wrong with you?! Anecdotal my fucking arse! >:(
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:27 PM
1

Radical Feminism, today, is about female domination over men, and stripping them of the rights. Radical Feminists will even smear, attack, and destroy non-Feminist women. Your definition doesn't mean anything when all of the major Feminists are toxic, man-hating pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 06:29 PM
343

"Unprofessional" is the very least of what's wrong with this piece-of-shit "doctor".
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:06 PM
1

They've even hijacked /r/Anarchism, and push their insanity there. I got silently and swiftly banned for making a comment criticizing Radical Feminism.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:08 PM
2

Feminism is exclusive about women's rights ~ it has never been about men's rights. Truly equal rights for men and women is just called being fair. No ideology needed. I mean, women have had equal rights with men before Feminism became a big thing. The reality is that Feminism has been spear-headed, from the start, by those who want to exclusive rights for women. And that means squashing the rights of men.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 07:44 AM
1

You do you, I suppose.
/r/MGTOW31/12/18 12:30 PM
8

"The future is female" Uh, sure thing. Just don't blame males when the human population count falls off a cliff.
/r/MGTOW31/12/18 11:50 AM
14

That's particularly evil ~ she basically incapacitates you, rapes you, then claims the opposite! What a piece of shit woman ~ she only did this most probably because she figured #MeToo and #BelieveWomen will protect her.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 03:53 PM
1

Agreed. However, due to their diet, they don't suffer from heart disease or diabetes or the like. Sumos, at the end of their career, do also undergo equally special diets that aim at gradually removing all of the weight.
/r/MGTOW29/12/18 10:32 PM
2

You didn't even watch the video... it outlines the biochemical effects of how fructose is processed differently to glucose by the liver, and how that causes huge problems. Glucose doesn't cause any of the issues linked with fructose. At least watch the biochemistry section, if nothing else.
/r/MGTOW29/12/18 11:21 AM
4

Sumo wrestlers are healthy, because their diets are carefully controlled. All of the symptoms we associate with being overweight and obese ~ they're caused by fructose, specifically. How do we know? Because people who become obese and overweight through eating tons of white rice do not suffer those symptoms, because white rice is all glucose. As explained in this lecture of the dangers of sugar, Professor Robert Lustig, who specializes in Endocrinology and Pediatrics, has noted that all of the i…
/r/MGTOW29/12/18 09:26 AM
9

She's no sumo wrestler type, that's for sure, lol. Unlike her, sumo wrestlers are actually healthy.
/r/MGTOW29/12/18 08:04 AM
5

And you sound like someone who's just dismissing the major issues that "gender studies" is causing, by creating new generations of brainwashed Radical Feminists.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:29 PM
3

I don’t get why people in this sub hate on gender studies so much? Because majority of the time "gender studies" basically ends up pumping out brainwashed Feminist tools who believe that men are, basically, evil. That should tell you that the name is merely a front for pushing Feminist propaganda. Or maybe the Feminists just hijacked the field completely, with it starting out as pure? I dunno, but the field is Feminist dominated. "Gender studies" has, overall, done no good in the world, and has …
/r/MensRights26/12/18 07:58 PM
12

I see this often ~ posts which generalize all women as this, or that. They don't use "some women" ~ just "women". It's maddening, because not all women are brainwashed "gender studies" footsoldiers.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:57 PM
9

Just more of the usual absolute insanity. >:(
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:10 AM
13

I'm pretty sure they ditched that rule ages ago, no?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:31 AM
0

Woman and men can both cook "properly", whatever that means. It's just that different individuals are better at certain cooking styles.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:30 AM
2

Stress alone doesn't drive women to kill their own babies, though. Mental illness might, though ~ especially for Feminists who hate males.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:59 AM
10

Now do another one that displays how much time each parents spends with their child. What does that have to do with women being far more likely to kill their own children...?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:59 AM
3

Where is the proof? The Bible doesn't count.
/r/MGTOW23/12/18 12:24 AM
52

A nice burn, especially when it comes from a non-Feminist woman. ;)
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:55 PM
7

Just when you thought the Radical Feminists couldn't get more mentally ill than they already are...
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:27 AM
3

/r/punchablefaces
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:01 AM
6

This heavily irritates me. When you get downvoted, and you have a lot of people replying to you, you don't get much change to defend yourself. Just Reddit favouring groupthink...
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:09 PM
2

Don't make the mistake of grouping all women with this subset of lunatics. Rather: Dear feminists: you're not as smart as you think you are. Non-feminist women are always smarter than you all.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 05:40 AM
2

Even the Feminists and Trans folks can't criticize Israel or Jews, despite their otherwise insane privileges, so that's saying something. "Anti-Semitic" is still the most powerful smear, and easy-argument-win device, that there is.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:57 AM
10

I wonder who're the sexist ones... And the Feminists moan about being "oppressed". Pretentious, lying bitches. Urgh.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:42 AM
19

I got banned from /r/LateStageCapitalism, lol. I was subbed there because, despite the name, they're wholly against corporate capitalism. However, one single comment of "transgender women are still biological males" earned me a few downvotes, and a quick ban. Tried to explain my position, and then they decided to cherry pick out-of-context quotes from my comment history as a reason to deny me. Hilarious, and so very sad. Why? Well, corporate capitalism LOVES feminism and transgender propaganda, …
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:06 AM
2

I agree ~ that's not rape. That's violence for the woman refusing attempted rape.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 01:16 AM
4

Sometimes, you can't trust your gut in various situations, as some feminist scum are just too cunning and clever.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:36 AM
2

Rape is sex that is forced upon an unwilling participant.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:42 AM
0

Pedophilia is literally an adult doing sexual shit to a child. 13 years old is still a child, 20 is an adult. Hell if he was 16 then maybe it wouldn’t be due to the age gap, but 13, yeah it’s pedophilia. Technically, if they've undergone puberty, they're no longer children. Which can no longer be defined as "pedophilia". A child is someone who has not gone through puberty yet.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:41 AM
0

The Jewish deity seems to, for one. The Christian-style of the deity doesn't seem any better. I don't see creation as defective, nor anything in it. "Defective" requires an truly objective standard to judge by, and we have no such standard. We're the ones who created all of the standards we judge ourselves, and others, by, for better or worse. Creation is... what it is. We do not know its origin ~ merely that we experience it, if a fraction of it. Our understanding is woefully limited... and pro…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 01:36 PM
1

God was too stingy to do that, it seems. A very fair deity. /s
/r/MensRights28/11/18 12:49 PM
10

Apparently, God supposedly couldn't find 10 "righteous" men, however the authors defined that. The morality of the Jewish deity is extremely questionable and arbitrary.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 12:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter