TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vandredd Archive

View 7 posts and 728 comments by Vandredd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

The first rule for any man interested in attracting women is to not take advice from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 10:48 PM
3

Be attractive, don't be unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:21 PM
3

This sounds like advice my mother would give to a young man. That's how bad this advice is
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 12:06 PM
2

The age be range is 15-44
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 06:30 PM
1

Actual number for black men is 53.4 reproduce which is actually the highest. His 40% seems to be completely made up. The numbers I posted earlier show the % of men that have fathered one biological child.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 05:41 PM
3

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr113.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjZ4rj6wKjvAhUyhOAKHWMuBuAQFjACegQIBBAC&usg=AOvVaw3bT62QBPyyMhZAOZmsV9qG Download the pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 05:29 PM
3

www.cdc.gov › nhsr › nhsr113PDF Fertility of Men and Women Aged 15–44 in the United States - CDC
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 03:57 PM
10

I had to look this up because it sounded like bullshit. Non hispanic black is 46.6 Non hispanic white is. 42.3 Non hispanic asian is 35.6 Hispanic native born is. 38.4 Hispanic foriegn born is. 63.7 This is people who have had a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/21 03:06 PM
2

These are both true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 03:33 PM
2

Adult in a public place makes ass of herself.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:38 PM
2

"I'm not comfortable with her behavior," said Kim Pentico of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. "What I am absolutely not willing to say is she's committed domestic violence without speaking with him and learning more about that relationship." Cute
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:27 PM
19

The patriarchy hurting men too /s
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:23 PM
1

I fail to see the issue here. If you dont like it, don't watch it. This has zero impact on you, me or anyone else here.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:05 PM
19

This is a great way to unknowingly become part of a national media hit piece and a very small retraction later. No thanks.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 05:18 PM
1

http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/10/14/deangelo-williams-breast-cancer-month-cameron-heyward Did you even read what I wrote?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 10:18 AM
1

The NFL pulled a similar situation with D'Angelo Williams wanting to honor his mother who fought breast cancer. The Nfl isn't sexist, they are arrogant and know they can get away with this shit with no reprocussions. This isn't a men's rights issue, the Nfl can do Whatever the hell it wants and it won't matter
/r/MensRights22/10/15 12:37 AM
1

Isn't that just what Communists do?
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:08 AM
13

Sorry, this page was recently deleted (within the last 24 hours). The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 20:00, 3 October 2015 SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) deleted page Beta Uprising (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events): per WP:SNOW. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Uprising) Good
/r/MensRights03/10/15 08:12 PM
1

The pope, and the official stance of the Catholic Church is against capital punishment
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:16 AM
1

This was exactly the point
/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:41 PM
7

like you can talk about men's reproductive rights without talking about abortion. On what planet?
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:08 PM
1

That situation is rare to the point of non existence.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 01:41 PM
1

This thread has some very silly conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 06:11 AM
2

No, it's all about President Obama's dear colleague letter.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:11 AM
36

Serena responded: "It's 11:30. To be perfectly honest with you, I don't want to be here. And done. This isn't misogyny. She didn't want to be there because it was late and she had just played a long tennis match as a part of a tournament. Was it misandry when Marshawn Lynch didnt want to go to the stupid press events? No.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:11 PM
4

Legally yes covers that. Practically no because most wouldn't be willing to bring the issue.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:50 PM
16

Legally, yes. Practically, no.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 11:53 AM
5

Let me guess, two white women.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:25 AM
16

Women don't generally need to ask men out. I'm married and hopefully never have to play this stupid game again.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:30 AM
7

Source please. This lacks any kind of context
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:25 PM
13

"What if I told you that only your sister was allowed to play football and learn math and become a president. And you weren't allowed to do that because you are a boy?" A yes the old applying third world standards to first world countries without a hint of shame.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:37 PM
9

and racism. A white girl isn't getting punished for this.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:10 PM
1

More things that black people get arrested for These laws need to be gone or the justice system needs mandatory punishments. This culture of leeway toward certain groups needs to die either way.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:07 PM
4

In New Jersey, you are 100% wrong. http://www.all-about-car-accidents.com/resources/insurance-law/car-insurance/new-jersey-auto-insuran
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:48 AM
2

Depends on the state. In NJ, his rates would go up because it's a no fault state.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:23 PM
5

"full responsibility" is where I jump off that thought train. She is responsible for putting herself in hat situation voluntarily but is not responsible for the illegal actions of other people. This is where I disagree with the "victim blaming" shouting hive. I don't believe anyone is responsible for the illegal acts of other people but everyone is responsible, within their power, for their own safety.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:18 AM
1

I wasn't disagreeing with you, actually adding to your point.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:14 PM
1

And how many of those were fake accounts provided by the website? This is how these websites work
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:04 PM
40

The % was massively skewed to men. Women don't actually need websites to have affairs and most women on these sites are actually not real people. Editing for context to my last point. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/08/25/ashley-madison-faked-female-profiles-to-lure-men-in-hacked-data-suggest/?tid=sm_tw
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:31 AM
0

Link is currently busted
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:14 PM
2

yep, its a leftists bludgeon because it still works.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:24 AM
6

Interesting racket they have going on. Most women never, ever initiate and therefore never pay.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:12 PM
9

Straight men usually go to clubs to meet women. Women usually go to clubs to actually have fun and can do so without ever talking to new men. Clubbing is an expensive excersize in futility if your going to meet women.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:15 PM
6

Those movements are full of shit on the matter.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:16 AM
7

I'm married as well. My wife hates gaming. She married me knowing that was a hobby of mine.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:14 PM
31

Gaming. This might be tough to hear, but, gaming is. not. cool. I don't care.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:37 AM
4

This law is not helping. • Students alleging sexual violence could decide whether to report the incident to law enforcement or not. If a serious crime were alleged and the student preferred not to involve police in an investigation, campus officials would not launch an internal investigation. But they could provide protections to the student, such as requiring the accused to avoid the accuser. No. No. No.No. An allegation that carries the weight of a rape allegation needs to be handled by the po…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:35 PM
1

Well I think your right because it would never get published.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:23 AM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrights/comments/3ef59h/the_cuckolded_new_york_magazine_man_who_wants_his/cteh71i Tagged for this? This is like getting a bunt single, they clearly missed my better work.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:56 AM
-1

Why is this downvoted? Edit:I understand this is reddit. If you have an issue that can't be overcome with one of the major political parties, you have 3 options. Vote for the other party, vote for a third party or don't vote.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:31 AM
1

Complete non issue. This is the women's section of the website talking about an issue from a womans perspective. This permanent victim schtick needs to stop. It's pathetic and I've had enough. There are real issues to be upset over, this isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:28 PM
6

So it is something to be ashamed of and not celebrated like he painfully pretends to do.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 12:12 PM
2

Lol, okay poly·am·ory :the state or practice of having more than one open romantic relationship at a time Are you just a bad troll? http://i.word.com/idictionary/polyamory
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:28 AM
2

I'm not in love with every person I am attracted to. You are stretching definitions to the point of absurdity. You belong to an incredibly small and niche group, good for you. Stop pretending everyone is secretly in your club.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:50 AM
3

Being attracted to multiple people is not the same as being romantically involved with multiple people. Your theory is not on firm ground. I'm attracted to many women but only romantically involved with my wife. That is my decision, not societies.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:41 AM
-1

Everyone is polyamorous Swing and a miss. This is a bold and silly general statement.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:28 AM
7

This sub won't get banned. What are they gonna ban the dub for, not bowing down to srs/Srd? Look over the front page and list the offensive posts. If disagreeing with extremists is worthy of getting banned, so be it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 01:14 AM
9

Well she did a horrible job of defending her position.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:40 PM
1

eh..not exactly. That is attractive female privilege. Ugly chicks get treated like men, they have to pay.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:40 AM
2

This is clearly class privilege. Class privilege trumps any other privilege.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 11:43 AM
-5

Clearly just not getting the mothers input would be better. Her opinion should not matter....or its just another insane person.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:20 AM
3

You are asking a question. The question is why women like x when you believe they should like y. Let's not play coy here. I personally won't date(married now so moot point) promiscuous women, women with bad attitudes, women with children,women that smoke, women that are messy, any woman not born a woman etc, etc. These are mercenary choices that don't have to be justified to be valid.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:10 AM
2

You are 100% right. Who we choose to date is up to us as an individual. This isn't a rights issue at all. A woman has every right to date whoever she wants. The same holds true for a man.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:04 AM
5

Women are free to date who they want. Men are free to date who they want, the end.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:01 AM
1

Never leave home without a good comma, my bad. Tyrion kills him with a crossbow
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:46 PM
2

Bro, spoilers
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:48 PM
0

Go cry more. Drogo gets cut and dies. Get all of your tears and ass pain out so you can get your sippy cup before dinner. Go to a sub where spoilers are appropriate and stop wanting the world to bend to your frail sensibilities
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:26 PM
5

Guess who didn't watch the whole thing.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:21 PM
-3

I'm just amazed you are actually that entitled. Cersei really enjoys having sex with her cousins, especially Lancel Lannister. She even gets him to get King Robert drunk enough to get himself killed while hunting. Anyway, this is not a GOT sub and your request is ridiculous. Edit:I have not even begun to climax spoilers all over your childish entitlement
/r/MensRights22/05/15 07:13 PM
6

No surprises here. Daughter of a judge gets cushy deal under the cover of dark, nothing to see here folks. Now that's some privilege
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:59 PM
5

Why in the hell would you expect a spoiler tag in a sub not related to anything to do with the books. How entitled are you? The man in black gets the girl in The Princess Bride. Did I spoil it, are you triggered? Jeffrey gets killed at his wedding.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:56 PM
3

Ned gets his head chopped off.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:48 PM
4

So what. Jesus dies in the Bible, did I spoil it for you? Why on earth would you expect a sub not focused on fantasy literature or tv shows to offer you, captain reads stories years after they come out, a damn spoiler. Edit 2: The answer to my question was yes. Reddit has such toxic people, I'm better off without it. Sayonara. WE DID IT REDDIT
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:46 PM
3

It was the usual outrage machines. The show is just much bigger now and the outrage machines have more to gain.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:55 PM
1

Assuming doesn't seem to be working for you.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:40 AM
2

How did you think this post was a good idea?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:12 AM
-2

Provide a source or delete this because its embarrassing
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:08 PM
0

Nope. those numbers are incredibly wrong.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:07 PM
5

I actually disagree. There were complaints but the show did not have the audience or impact it does now. A better example would be how Ramsey treated Theon.....crickets, crickets everywhere
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:03 PM
2

It will not work. They will just redefine words until they are right.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:58 PM
2

So when is Srd getting banned?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 10:00 PM
16

redditor for 56 minutes You can do better AMR/SRD
/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:52 PM
0

What worthwhile idea or product is this person giving the world? His canard about diverse communities IS white nationalist propaganda.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:19 AM
-4

Diversity is a failure. Non homogeneous societies dont do well. Thats human nature. Diversity is an artificial construct held together by coercion. Those are white nationalist talking points. Stop being obtuse.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:04 AM
-7

I was referring to the Redpill, forever alone poster pushing white rights talking points. You know, you.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:49 AM
-8

Why is this garbage upvoted?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:21 AM
1

I saw the onion title Verbatim on my Facebook feed from Cnn. The truth is officially irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:38 AM
6

This goes hand in hand with pretending girls and boys are the same and then just treating everyone like girls. The fruits of this behavior can be seen in higher education right now
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:48 AM
3

herp derp no difference between girls and boys herp derp
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:44 AM
1

I'm trying to see a downside and I don't see one as long as things like seniority, qualifications and reviews are also available.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:18 PM
6

There is a legal agreement in place forbidding this. I don't want anyone forced to be a parent against there will. Has ANYONE here championed this guy's cause? 4-9000- it's Valenti
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:50 AM
60

If you married a single mother, you already dun goofed
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:08 PM
1

Is Dame Magazine a new nexus of crazy?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:29 PM
1

Equal opportunity is not enough to ensure equality of outcome. There I fixed the opening line.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 12:18 AM
2

http://lostallhope.com/suicide-methods/statistics-most-lethal-methods Most of these cries for help happen with over the counter and prescription drugs which have a 12.3% and 6% chance of success. If you really trying to kill yourself, 87% and 94% survival rates are bad odds. These are cries for help and they usually work. Only thing with worse odds is wrist cutting which is super popular with the crying for attention group.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:39 PM
1

They are called cries for help. Pills almost never work.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:59 PM
1

I didn't see the X
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:53 PM
3

The day my microwave or tv say no is its last day.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 10:46 PM
0

She is less of s person because she is an idiot that has unprotected sex with 25 random guys. Thanks for ensuring slut shaming is regarded as an even more worthless term. The guys are idiots for having sex with this spank. I think less of all of them. Does that make me a slut shamed? I don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:40 PM
31

You aren't saying what they want you to say. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:46 PM
-1

This is pretty racist. Return of Kings is a joke.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:49 PM
1

Wait one damn second, there's gambling in this casino? I got confused with all these bears shitting in the woods and realizing the Pope was in fact catholic.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:39 PM
3

Yet Rolling Stone's senior editors are unanimous in the belief that the story's failure does not require them to change their editorial systems. "It's not like I think we need to overhaul our process, and I don't think we need to necessarily institute a lot of new ways of doing things," Dana said. "We just have to do what we've always done and just make sure we don't make this mistake again." Coco McPherson, the fact-checking chief, said, "I one hundred percent do not think that the policies tha…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:17 PM
9

I would never date someone who didn't believe in equality for both men and women. I would never date someone who believed I was part of a international cabal known as the Patriarchy either.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:01 PM
2

This is the couple’s second time to file for divorce.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 12:00 PM
281

This is an easy one. Never go back there and bad mouth hat establishment to the owner and everyone you know.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:12 PM
1

2011, the most recent year for which there are data, only slightly more than 2 percent of kindergarten and preschool teachers were male. men and women chose different majors an fields. When I see a push for equal numbers or fay laborers and trashmen I will take these people seriously.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:10 PM
44

http://reason.com/blog/2015/03/19/male-students-non-pc-views-on-rape-stati This guy might actually be disruptive nutjob. Don't hitch your wagons to this one.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:42 PM
3

Karen Bickering is a slut walk organizer and moron. Guess what, no one should put themselves in danger.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:27 PM
7

Good to see this trash comment downvoted
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:38 AM
4

You can't reason someone out of a position they were not reasoned into.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:30 PM
3

Could someone list these rights women are lacking compared to men?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:00 PM
9

Is he paid as much as the lowest paid women in the office that do a completely different job? Be the change you want to see.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:00 PM
1

Has he been to public places in New Jersey? Are we that far ahead?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:28 AM
3

On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a "gentleman" who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the b…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:16 PM
37

If you want to celebrate women then give us true equality I've been trying to but no one actually wants it. Everyone wants all the advantages of their station in life and none of the downsides. This is just how humans are.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:28 PM
0

I am attacking your beliefs as it pertains to this argument. Stating you are a ginger in a conversation about reality TV would be ad hominem. This is on topic.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:59 PM
0

A communist walks into a thread and claims others are in denial. This is fantastic.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:30 PM
1

Ok /u/anticapitalist. Back in reality the political ideologies of a country are based on their country. You mistake your vision of a center and the relative location of right and left for some objective thought. The democratic and Republican party,though both right wing to a socialist or communist like yourself are left and right relative to their country. I am shocked a blind ideologue cannot take any outside opinion seriously,shocked I tell you.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 02:01 PM
0

Well that's silly. Left/right is relative to the society. Thats like saying republicans aren't right wing because of the existence of UKIP in England.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:53 PM
0

Communists in practice are authoritative.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:46 PM
1

It would either be deleted or edited to oblivion.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:39 PM
-1

It isn't that he is a porn star. There is nothing about him worth quoting
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:23 PM
0

Absolutely insane. These kangaroo courts should be abolished if anything
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:06 PM
-5

An article that wishes to be taken seriously does not quote a porn star
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:05 PM
2

I have noticed that any can call themselves a feminist, no matter how batshit crazy and still be considered a feminist by these people. On the other side people like Roosh, who are open and honest about he fact that they are not MRAs still get called MRAs even though they explicitly decline the title. These people have no consistency, get used to it.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:03 PM
17

Hollywood and the very highest levels of business are the only places a wage gap actually exist. For the average person it does not exist in a meaningful way depicting discrimination. This is a very rich woman circle jerking with other very rich people ad is far detached from the lives of the average person.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:22 PM
6

That writer is an asshole. I cant take him seriously with such an abrasive and dickish writing style.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:26 AM
-12

Agreed. This is not worthy of outrage
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:54 PM
-9

They were married at the time. Any money won would be half hers, that isn't an issue and shouldn't be controversial. There is so much we don't know here, how much was child support? If this was their only source of income, spousal support after she got half is insane.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:53 PM
1

This should have always been the case. It pisses me off this us left to keystone cops and kangaroo courts run but the humanities department.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:14 PM
1

She sounds like a nItty sovereign citizen. Those cooks shouldn't be near children.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:28 PM
3

“misandry” – the institutionalized hatred of men That isn't what that word means.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:23 PM
-9

This is a pretty terrible comment. The vast majority of women are not insane online social justice warriors.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:37 PM
1

Incapacitated has a new meaning. Good to know.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:31 PM
2

Has to be. If she won't touch it though, this hoaxer is on for a liflifetime of shit.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:46 AM
32

People with little fear of repercussions for shitty behavior tend to be assholes when they want to. This should surprise no one.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 03:00 PM
2

This should come as a surprise to no one.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:36 PM
10

We humans LOVE to hold people to standards while HATING to be held to standards.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 01:14 PM
14

I 100% would not care if the given reason was violence in general. Women are such a ludicrously small % of the people affected by violence games compared to the hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of men I have digitally killed.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:59 PM
0

This post sounds like againstmenrights propaganda with a large side of complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:04 AM
2

"tha guy" exists in strawmen
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:11 PM
1

Can we deny him a visa? Thats a thing now right?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:30 PM
9

Are you joking? Gang culture gets critisized constantly. Rap videos have been the subject of Confessional hearings.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 04:31 AM
1

The term "MRA" is one of their worst slurs there, right after republican.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:49 PM
13

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10660612/Women-are-almost-42-per-cent-more-likely-to-take-sick-days-than-men.html Interesting theory you have there.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:05 PM
3

It absolutely is what he was asserting. It's not an issue of just confidence and acting like it's a magic bullet is idiotic, no matter who is saying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/14 10:10 PM
3

The false premise was his belief in what is average and how that "average" person sees himself. Mere confifence will never be the determining factor if "average" is a male model. A male model with confidence, or without has no bearing on actual average men. This doesn't even address the fact that it's a tv show, I mean come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/14 09:41 PM
3

How does not answering questions on a false premise shed light on anything bit the quality of the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/14 05:43 PM
11

He is 6 foot 4, always been in great shape with strong attractive features. If he's average, 95% if not a higher precent of men are untouchange trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/14 04:54 PM
10

Jared Padalecki is average looking? I am inretested in what you find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/14 04:43 PM
3

Gay men do not treat women on a pedestal or give them special treatment just for being women for the most part.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:02 PM
1

Honestly all it requires is not being a shit head.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:00 AM
1

How in the hell does this not violate title 9?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:47 AM
1

This post is terrible, he was clearly mocking the policy.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:38 AM
2

I actually thought he was being sarcastic
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:37 AM
1

So we should confine men to their impervious and emotionless gender roles because.........people think men are impervious and emotionless? Are you kidding?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:09 AM
5

"In some of these cases, even if a woman has a child, she may be better off with government help than a nonworking, noninvolved husband." a man would get crucified for saying this.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:18 PM
1

Consider this. http://www.usu.edu/ust/index.cfm?article=54179 Some thing is very wrong one one party is lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/14 07:09 PM
9

The Montreal massacre isn't a rallying cry for "anti feminists." That threat hit every feminist point but the wage gap. This reaks of false flag and I hope they put serious effort inot finding who did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/14 06:56 PM
5

Having sex with someone that is drunk to the point of not being able to stand is rape to more than just feminist strawmen.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 07:11 PM
5

The man was too drunk to stand or complete sentences. The woman saw him sitting outside and remarked on how drunk he was. The next scent was sex with her on top. How is that not rape? How does a man to drunk to stand give consent?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 05:35 PM
-2

Um, can we get this removed. This is an idiotic conspiracy theory from a deranged person about another damaged person.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:33 PM
1

Then don't call it patriarchy because that word has a meaning. I don't call a printer a cucumber for a reason.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:27 PM
1

Um, bullshit. he societal pressures on men are placed their primarily by woman. The reverse is true for women. It isn't "patriarchy" its society. men and women create these gender roles.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:17 PM
3

It’s no secret that Millennial women are outshining their male peers. Women are now 33 percent more likely than men to earn their Bachelor’s degree and are far more likely to receive a Master’s or a PhD. Millennial women are more likely to be employed than their male counterparts. the Patriarchy works in mysterious ways.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:02 PM
4

You have major issues with the vast majority of humans and other animals that have ever existed. Congratulations on super special snowflake status.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:33 PM
2

Are you having a stroke?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:27 PM
5

"You do realize that women act they way they do because men prefer it right?" I would 100% agree with this statement. Your post makes zero sense as an attack on me.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:17 PM
4

Not even close. Also I'm getting married on October 25. What a low level shaming attempt.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 03:54 PM
0

In every species the prime directive is to mate and ensure survival. Please tell us what defines gender roles. Is it the mythological patriarchy?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:06 PM
16

If women were attracted to delicate soft spoken shy men, more men would fit that description. That is exactly why the roles exist.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:48 PM
2

It isn't sexist at all. It just ignores the reasons gender roles even exist, romantic preference for those gender roles.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:05 PM
11

romantic"personal preferences" are the entire reason gender roles exist. Actions always speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:01 PM
15

You do realize that men act they way they do because women prefer it right? That is how the whole gender roles thing works.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:57 AM
0

Never, ever take women seriously on what they are looking for in a man.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:53 AM
3

I'm gonna have to see stats and convictions before taking this seriously
/r/MensRights25/09/14 08:29 PM
4

http://m.ibtimes.com/who-matthew-janney-meet-actress-emma-watsons-rumored-new-boyfriend-photo-1533780 Ok Emma. Why is it so hard to believe gender roles are enforced through romantic selection habits? Man act the way they do because women find it attractive, women act the way they do because men find it attractive.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:59 AM
110

This is what equality looks like, feminists have never liked it. Gender roles are bad for women but essential for men, as it has always been.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:28 AM
3

Young men of California, I have two words for you. Sue first.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:19 PM
6

5000 is a pretty damn good sample size. http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_ideas/Soc_participants.shtml
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:33 PM
3

Good fucking lord how many companies does Marcotte write for?
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:11 PM
2

I'm from New Jersey and Sweeney is a jackass. The image macro is a poor one because most of the stats are just made up. There are so many things skewing divorce stats, like age, education and the grandaddy of them all, people having multiple divorces shitting up the numbers.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:43 PM
0

The 50% divorce rate is malarkey. This really needs the citations listed.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:01 PM
1

Number seems incredibly low.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:11 PM
18

Sounds like a guy standing on a sidewalk and a paranoid reaction. I have been known to walk on sidewalks(as crazy and ballsy as that seems) while committing the crime of being black. When met with terror for no reason, I would look a this nutjob too.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:06 PM
0

yup. It's a stupid policy but it's their policy.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:29 PM
134

"Don't hit anyone" is now misogyny. Get it together feminism.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:02 PM
2

The Hayden Rider The provisions of this article shall not be construed to impair any rights, benefits, or exemptions now or hereafter conferred by law upon persons of the female sex.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:01 PM
1

Hayden Rider If this still exists I can't support it.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:59 PM
2

Say it with me folks, male gender roles are good and enforced, female gender roles are the devil. Male sexuality is a value of worth and something to be judged on, female sexuality is beyond reproach. This is as it ever was.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:50 PM
2

He needs to file a lawsuit under title 9 immediately.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:38 PM
1

This is random but why can we see his post if he is shadow banned? Is there a faq on how shadow bans work?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:59 PM
3

While nondisclosure may be a good idea for avoiding family problems, there need to be some exceptions, For example, lab technicians may see DNA that leads them to suspect rape or incest. This type of finding might need to be reported because of the possibility of sexual abuse. Of course a situation where a woman is the victim changes the rules.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:59 PM
1

if it no longer exists, why is the freedom and eligibility to be a full citizen dependent on signing up for it? Where is the law saying It wont be used? Did you sign up for it?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:33 PM
1

I might see your point if every male in the country did not have to sign up for something you don't think exists. Was there a change in the law that I'm unaware of?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:12 PM
2

I had to sign this thing saying I could be drafted when I was 18.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:57 PM
6

http://beyondthebox.org/women-and-girls-lead-says-man-up/#.T4hNKlG0wqI That was fast.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:38 AM
0

Don't get it twisted. If you are anti-feminist, be anti-feminist based on actual feminist theory. Don't get it twisted, I judge people on what they actually do, not what they claim to do.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:02 AM
6

Feminists have always had eliminating traditional gender roles for women as a goal. Traditional gender roles for men are good though because they primarily benefit women
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:12 PM
2

False-appearing to be the thing denoted; deliberately made or meant to deceive Because it's completely made up and has zero evidence of actually happening. Every post you have here is concern trolling.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:07 PM
6

An anonymous story from XO Jane(which has zero journalistic integrity) that hits literally every feminist strawman of MRAs while referencing Red Pill.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:14 PM
7

Yeah this is pure entitlement and gender reinforcing propaganda. Women are less and less likely to be forced into traditional gender roles by society while men are.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:00 PM
9

While you speak truth, I've personally had enough of blatantly false accusations that are used to pain oponents as monsters.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:48 AM
3

This grants them a privilege in society how? 2.a.blacks get called on racist stuff all the time. In fact I'm sure you have done it yourself b. You mean like Italian Americans, Irish Americans, German Americans etc? In the United states black is also an ethnicity because of reasons I would hope you were fully aware of. C.the majority of blacks vote democrat, full stop. Sure Obama got 95%, every Democrat gets at least 90%,. The point is silly and ignorant. 3.Jesse Jackson has more Relevance to per…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:27 PM
2

This is either poor satire or I would like you to state how black males are more privileged than white males.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:13 PM
3

I imagine they just got raped at whatever sport they were playing last year against the team they are playing tonight. I refuse to take these garbage adds seriously.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:02 PM
14

This author has a hell of a set of balls on him. One program for men of color was too much for him to stomach. President Obama has done jack shit for black men because he was afraid he would be called a racist. So he does nothing and the people that wanted to call him racist called him a racist anyway.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:56 AM
4

Its a great but flawed sub. Most feminists we see online only post in "safe spaces" where they cannot be challenged.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:22 PM
1

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/fact_sheet_sexual_violence.pdf Check under the schools obligations. Violation of Title 9 means the loss of federal funds which is why Title 9 has any teeth to begin with.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:14 PM
2

The Dear Colleague letter is forcing Universities to use a lower burden of proof in sexual assault cases or be in violation of Title 9, which would mean the federal government would pull federal loan funding, without which these schools could never survive. Are you pretending to be ignorant here?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:58 AM
5

Just putting this quote in a top level comment so everyone sees it. "Assuming it is a male and female, it is the responsibility in the case of the male to gain consent before proceeding with sex," said [dean] Wasiolek. Equality movement?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:24 AM
0

If you don't know what the Dear Colleague Letter is, you are just ignorant on the subject at hand.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:01 AM
7

If Duke received no private funds you would be correct. The Dear College letter was a threat to pull out the real money even private colleges need, federal student loans.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:13 PM
2

Women and men value different things in partners. The silly idea that they don't is feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:25 PM
1

Sorry mat, I take what people say as exactly what the mean.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:02 PM
6

These are the same people that attempt to emasculate and devalue the opinions of men by calling them virgins. It's not entitlement.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:24 PM
3

Planning to get famous teaching them a lesson?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/14 12:40 PM
10

We've received quite a few reports about users who have claimed to have received a large amount of harassment, but when we investigate we find that they've often never received any PMs at all, or only one message when they claim to have received many. Some people have even gone so far as creating alts to PM themselves with, so that they can take screenshots for "proof". where have we seen this before? Interesting indeed.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 12:07 PM
9

No, it was much better before becoming a default. It was far and sway the best woman oriented subreddit and actually reasonable on most things. Making it a default brought in a wave of trolls. Now it has become a battleground for trolls and srs types which make it the horrendous black hole it is today.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 12:05 PM
1

It won't be gender nuertral and you can bet on that. These people believe the Duluth model and VAWA are gender neutral.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 02:16 AM
5

"Oh that's how men are viewed in society? Well that's their own fucking fault then, because it's a society that they rule" How do you measure intelligence? This is not something an intelligent or rational person would say. A small minority of wealthy people rule society, as it has always been. The average man has little to no power in shaping society.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:19 PM
3

I like Freakonomic's theory on this. After abortion was made legal, many of the potential rapists, born to people who could now abort the child they didn't want to take care of in the first place were just never born. 1993 is 20 years after the decision.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:19 PM
15

What location is this? I have never heard the word creep or creeper applied to a woman.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:05 PM
3

Any critical question is bannable and any dissent is seen as hate speech. Both subs use that criteria.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 02:23 PM
3

demmian does cross bannings. If he decides to ban you from one, usually for any reason he makes up on the spot, he will ban you from all subs he moderates.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 12:12 PM
6

I love that they igore the fact that there users cannot even agree on what "real feminism" is and vehemently get butthurt when someone expresses a version of feminism that they see as oppression. The "feminists" are doing the downvoting of things that aren't "feminist" to their liking.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:50 AM
4

Honestly I want a ma to say something about Jenny Mccarthy's sister so she can get her ass kicked for killing so many damn children with her vaccine garbage.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:05 PM
1

This i a pile of horse shit. If he hit here there is no way she would be defending him.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:04 PM
170

Sorry, I think the term reverse sexism, like reverse racism is idiotic. There is only racism and only sexism. A woman that is sexist toward a man is being sexist, not reverse sexist.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:55 PM
17

SLUT SHAMER.....lol. Yeah that is what these people actually believe.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:39 AM
1

It was honestly a quality subs and the batshit feminists didnt even see it as a feminist space. The extreme anti feminists and bats hit feminists now have a battleground.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:19 PM
9

Administrators calling her a slut. A person with her post history here and no charges? No she is a damn liar.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:22 AM
18

I've been called a slut by administrators for wearing a t-shirt and jean shorts You are also a damn liar.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:42 AM
26

I'll take my downvotes. You chose to worsen your judgement and made a bad decision. Unless she drugged you or you can prove that you were blacked out at the time she deserves zero punishment. This sub has to be consistent, if its bullshit when a woman tries it, it is also bullshit when a man tries it.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:06 AM
2

Formatting. Mr. /u/jnsu_, what you've just written is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this subreddit is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:55 AM
3

In the context of being blamed for an actual rape? No I don't and I can imagine a well balanced person that would. Sluts are promiscuous women, this doesn't mean they don't deserve equal treatment and protection under the law. I probably wouldn't have a chance to call someone a slut because I would not associate with sluts or man whores. Our views on the world are at odds.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:25 PM
2

Morris, who has a child of her own Shocking, not really.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:49 AM
4

Of course it will. RAINN is not a charter member of the Patriarchy™
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:29 AM
0

Gb2 AMR
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:45 PM
1

um, what? All squares are rectangles, not all rectangles are squares. The difference between rape culture and human trafficking is well...one of them is real.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:08 PM
7

this isn't even Cosmo.....which means Cosmo is leaking.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:34 PM
1

You can't motivate the average reader if there's no hook. But the editorial writer should at least make sure the numbers being used don't immediately prompt incredulous laughter from any reader with a couple of functioning brain cells. RAPE APOLOGIST
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:51 PM
1

I mean, which of us don't prowl the streets at 2:30am looking to protect damsels in distress?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:57 PM
0

Intersectionality don't real. That picture has to be a joke. A rich white woman has more power than anyone but a rich white man. And that is only if that rich white man is richer than here. Its almost as if class and wealth play a Large factor.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:25 PM
-2

educate these shitlords.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:01 AM
-3

male HR manager does not compute.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 10:12 PM
10

99.7% of people are "cis"and your gonna just have to deal with it.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:24 PM
38

"If you have sex differences in the title, that abstract won't accepted" This is what you call a head shot against the modern politics of science and the feminist control of academia.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:20 PM
12

If you don't have a valid answer for what to do in case of a zombie Apocalypse, I don't want you on my team. I thought I was told women were into these things like men? Is that no longer the case?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:18 AM
1

So how did you enjoy Thunderdome? Banning is easier than allowing anyone to question dogma.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:41 PM
5

Xhi forgot to change from xers AMR account.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:27 PM
2

It blows my mind that anyone would be against it.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:45 PM
-6

I'm really gonna need another source on this. It feels like bait
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:39 PM
5

Those comments are horrific.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:37 AM
-2

I sorry, I treat my fiancée great, I also treat people with respect. All of that is a part of being a good person. Being a good person in my case means being a good man. Those people are married and should treat each other great. It isnt saying she shouldn't treat him like a king.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:48 PM
1

If anybody needs to learn the power of 'NO' it's men & boys. explain this.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:06 PM
2

I'm confused. What is the point of this? I treat my fiance better than other people, so what.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:20 PM
4

Can someone ask them to objectively define creep? http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f76_1323277426 Until they can this is the only response.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:49 PM
1

Sorry, those facts" are complete bullshit. These myths actually hurt people who are actually raped and should be ridiculed. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/mar/19/myths-about-rape-conviction-rates
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:43 PM
2

/u/demmian will ban you from all subs he moderates to save himself time.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:32 PM
18

You know that word means hatred of women right? It doesn't mean someone disagreed with a woman somewhere a some point which makes him a misogynist.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:30 PM
1

The draft is one place that feminists and actual misogynists agree.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:39 AM
1

The draft is inherently unfair, and there's nothing you can do to change that. Bullshit but Ill continue it's better to draft 10 men than a coed group of 15 people. It's the difference between fucking over 10 people and fucking over 15 people. And I noped out of there.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:35 AM
5

I never got past the first story because it invalidated everything after it.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 09:51 PM
2

Mia Farrow is a disturbed person who has made up things like this in the past , lied about paternity and has had 20 years to paint Allen( who I personally don't care about) as a monster. There is no evidence that he did it, its a witch hunt. You assume the people frothing at the mouth about this are sane and rational when it comes to sexual abuse, they are not. A man will always be guilty to them. There won't be a trial, its just random accusations from someone that has been abused by her mother…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:30 PM
6

/r/amr ----> that away. Garbage bait.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:57 PM
13

He can't win the PR battle because he isn't dealing with rational or logical people. He was better off ignoring them.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:40 PM
3

This is a sad unintended consequence of rape hysteria. Somehow the Patriarchy™ is still at fault.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:37 PM
1

Not commenting on who is right or wrong. What a completely fucked up family.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:32 AM
3

I was under the impression that it was self reported studies. Do you have anything to back your claim up?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:12 PM
4

I'm Kappa Sigma. Most of my best friends to this day are my fraternity brothers. TFM is a cesspool.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:10 PM
6

if TSM is like Total Frat Move.....we should strive for better sources.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:43 AM
2

Sup /u/tiol why the hell is your sock puppet not banned?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:38 AM
75

I honestly twitched. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/21/barack-obama/barack-obama-ad-says-women-are-paid-77-cents-dolla/ Big balls on this guy.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:16 AM
1

I tried showing this yesterday, seems obvious to me
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:00 PM
0

Thievery was specifically brought up. It isn't true and the headline is tasteless and racist.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:00 PM
0

That rape isnt sex without consent? No, you are a complete idiot.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:01 PM
0

If rape is sex without consent, you're wrong, it's that simple. Troll harder, you will now be trolling alone after that.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:26 PM
0

Rape is sex without consent. I'm a guy on the internet, you don't have to take my word for anything. Just be aware words like analogy have a meaning ad bending them to whatever we want at a particular time is not , cute, wise or needed.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:11 PM
-1

I have listed the definitions of analogy and analogous. I have articulated my point logically as to why it is a bad analogy. The analogy is only valid if a.) men do not commit the majority of rapes or b.) black people are the majority of thieves. None of these things are true .
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:04 PM
-1

Because they aren't like things. It is comparing two things that are not alike. This is the definition of analogous. comparable in certain respects, typically in a way that makes clearer the nature of the things compared. How is a thing that isn't true and one that is comparing like things?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 07:02 PM
10

I am sorry I entertained your nonsense. Last post for me on this topic. Don't feed the trolls. If you feel a threat is credible, call the cops If you can't deal with trolls, pick a different medium.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 07:00 PM
5

Call the police. Shits hard man.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:45 PM
0

One being technically true and the other being totally not true is pretty damn relevant.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:28 PM
8

That is considered a death threat by these people. Do you not see how this is little more than grandstanding?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:00 PM
4

-888. Listen, you have been told multiple times that the UK has a ridiculous law but that isn't the case everywhere. You have been proven to be ignorant in everything you have posted. Just stop.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:52 PM
-1

a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification. Structurally, his analogy fails because they are not analogous.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:47 PM
5

Is "die in a fire" A death threat?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:38 PM
-1

Well we can agree to disagree. I think factually inaccurate analogies don't help the conversation and distract from the message.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:59 PM
-4

Oh it makes sense and I have agreed with the sentiments many times in this thread. I just disagree with the analogy because its a bad one.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:56 PM
0

Really? I think I have and actually gave an accurate analogy that is much better. Black people do not commit the most theft. Men do commit the most rape. Neither should be singled out in definitions but they certainly are not analogous.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:51 PM
-1

Were talking passed each other. I agree with the sentiment and not with the analogy because its a bad one.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:45 PM
8

There is a fundamental difference between a credible threat and a non credible threat. 99%+ is probably overestimating credible rape threats like the one you described. Also if Lindy Wests rape threat complaints are any indication, "rape threat" is damn near anything she doesn't like.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:43 PM
-6

No its wrong because the word analogy actually means something. The two are not analogous. One is technically true but uneeded and offensive. The other is not at all true and offensive. Words have meanings, its a bad analogy.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:23 PM
1

No. That is not correct. Its usually sexual assault of different degrees.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:20 PM
9

What you just described is a substantial threat that is illegal in every first world country. 99%+ of these threats are no where near that.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:18 PM
-3

I totally understand your reasoning. The problem was it was just a bad comparison. Men do on fact commit the most rape, black people do not commit the most theft, the analogy is flawed. A better analogy would be a definition of someone that commits murder by gun as typically black. The statement while technically true is unseeded and labels an entire population. I want the definition changed, I just also want a consistent analogy.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:14 PM
-6

His first analogy was insinuating that most theft was by black people. I showed him why that just isn't true by nature of the legal definition of theft. It was a bad analogy. Men do in fact commit the majority of rape; the definition should of course be changed though. The second analogy was idiotic. If I said non bushmen commit the most car theft, sure its true but it means absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:04 PM
7

"Charged as rapists" is more of a media thing. Generally it is sexual assault of varying degrees. What you describing is more of a UK problem. The media usually doesn't call women rapists and that is a media problem. There is van issue with prosecutors not wanting to try women and when they do, they often go after them with lighter charges.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:00 PM
1

But that's a useless statistic signifying nothing. Whites are a minority of the world population, why wouldn't they be a minority if thieves by any definition on a global scale? I agree the definition needs to be changed but your analogies are just plain terrible.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:41 PM
9

www.arte-sana.com/.../rape_statutes.pdf Each state decides what is and is not rape in the US. The FBI does not.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:37 PM
13

Anyone that doesnt understand why feeding trolls is bad can't be helped.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:27 PM
9

In the US rape is by penetration, which is typically how men do it, women typically force sex by envelopment so rapists are typically men. No. This is wrong so just stop.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:21 PM
-13

Well thats even dumber. Whites are no where near the majority worldwide. Honestly it is ok to admit it was a bad analogy.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:17 PM
4

Sad fact is most don't live with their children whether they want to or not. I have a three step solution Quality sex education with realistic descriptions risks of parenting and its affects on their future. Ending the war on drugs immediately. This will result in fewer families but better Families. The war on drugs is a failure and black men get longer sentences firvdrug crimes and records that preclude them from much of non gang related gainful employment.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:12 PM
2

Women earn more college degrees and out earn men in the younger generations. When these policies push past the topping points, will it be that women(it will only be white women but they are the only group the vast majority of feminists give a damn about) are just better than men?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:16 PM
1

I'm going to post an Askreddit about fedoras based on that guy. Honestly I can't pinpoint the stereotype because it seems to shift.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:49 PM
2

Still not good enough. Editors should have to publically defend this. Is there a way to get their names and email addresses?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:37 PM
10

Just try to get the typically male removed. Theft is a very broad term combining many different things. Typically black, while I get your point probably isn't even true. The term theft is sometimes used synonymously with Larceny. Theft, however, is actually a broader term, encompassing many forms of deceitful taking of property, including swindling, Embezzlement, and False Pretenses. Some states categorize all these offenses under a single statutory crime of theft.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:35 PM
5

this is exactly what I was thinking.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:04 PM
94

This is a God damned masterpiece. They have feminists seeing just how ass backwards the law is. You could replace she with he and that particular article has been written thousands of times. I wonder if she realizes.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 07:33 PM
4

"Men don't have emotions" isn't our schtick here.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:54 PM
8

Feminists attack male sexuality on one hand and then put down men because of their lack of having sex with women(virgin, neckbearsld etc) when convenient.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:29 PM
8

/r/socialism might be the worst feminist sub on this entire site. They banned many of the truly insane people but many still frequent it. Their ideology is simple, Socialism which is apparently no longer an economic theory is IMPOSSIBLE without Tumblr like feminism privilege theory.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:25 PM
10

Doesnt even matter. The people parroting this crap know its garbage and have shown they just dont care.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:05 PM
12

Here is what happened. In order to make things simpler they decided yo group people by qualifications into "pay bands.". Shockingly this doesn't not Take what the job actually is into account. It was decided that they would have to pay more for less desirable jobs. In what is sure to be a shock to No one here, men had a larger presence in shittier more demanding jobs.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:10 PM
8

Thats rights, now we can label jobs as "equivalent" even though one may be outside in the elements and the other may be in an air conditioned office. One job can require hard physical labor and the other may not require any force and very little work at all. This is the next phase in the equal pay boondoggle. Equal pay should be for equal work, not for work that isnt equal but is found to be "equivalent."
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:00 PM
0

Most feminists in the classical sense would never call themselves feminist.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:51 PM
2

Its still made by fringe elements today. Its just that now, they really are just fringe elements.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:49 PM
2

Its easy and any one who wants the truth is said to hate women.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:45 PM
7

Perhaps I wasnt clear. The current internet feminists are making a mockery.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:11 AM
29

The judge should never decide another case.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:20 AM
16

I think it is important to state that she doesn't need feminism because feminism, not the crazy tumblrite joke it is now, has already won. Who here is honestly against the sexes being treated differently? Who here actually argues women should be paid less for the same job? Equality is the default position. Its a damn shame that these people are making a mockery out of the actual good feminism did.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:18 AM
9

Do you have a source for this. Men are disproportionately the victims of violent crimes.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:13 AM
7

Men suffer more violence than women by a large amount. I think you may be confusing one type of violence with all violence.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:12 AM
0

In one of the 80 or so comments the mod deleted. He deleted every comment but his, including the mod that made the thread and responded to the comments.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:08 AM
-1

I was in the comment thread that had to be nuked. They made it very clear that comments against men were ok because they were not an oppressed class. Another mode had to come in and clean house because the mod making the announcement got destroyed. http://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/1swyol/please_read_the_sidebar/
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:50 AM
1

Its a few guys on a bunch of accounts up voting this crap.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:14 AM
3

this guy is a troll
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:14 PM
-2

The sun rising is not science. Why is rises is science. Crime statistics are not science, how they came to be and what they mean is science. D) I have no idea what /pol/ is oh /pol/ you so crazy.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:06 PM
-1

Don't insult my intelligence. You are /u/marclepinewasright and it is obvious. Crime stats are an observation, not science. There is a thing called the scientific method, I know that /pol/ screen macros wants nothing to do with the scientific method by I do. Your existence on this sub validates half the shit sjws claim /r/MensRights claims we really support. Just pick one account so you can say and defend your opinions.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:52 PM
0

They are an observation in a vacuum. I will just assume that this is another one of your accounts which is fine. Crime statistics are not created, they are observed and what we learn from those statistics and why they exist is science. What you, on all of your accounts wants to circle jerk on how the reason for black high crime rate is biological.That is why you jumped right from biological differences to crime. You arent clever and you arent good at hiding who you are, You are a coward. There a…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:36 PM
-1

Her body IS exclusively hers. I disagree with you vehemently on that point, her body, her choice. Now I do believe in financial abortion for parity. You got banned because /r/offmychest was taken over by feminist and banned any language disparaging to any woman about a month ago.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:18 PM
3

Upvoting you. /u/marclepinewasright is either a /pol/ troll or an srs troll. Oh look his account was created today and he is pretending to be white supremacist on /r/MensRights wow its so legit.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:15 PM
-2

They arent.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:12 PM
-6

Well then, go on, the class is waiting. Explain the relevant biological differences professor /pol/
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:11 PM
-2

Social Darwinism cultural marxism Nope, Nope, Nope. Go back to /pol/ you give all of us a bad name. I can't believe you got upvotes. Feel free to use all of your accounts. Or we can all believe those immediate downvotes came out of thin air. You and your brethren are CLOWNs. You have the same tired image macros you always have and just show your ignorance. You are not wanted in a Men's rights movement, stay in /r/WhiteRights with the people who at least have the honesty to state their opinions o…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:11 PM
4

Why does this registry even exist outside of adoption lawyers?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:21 PM
2

Abuse would be an at fault reason for divorce. N0 fault means you can cheat, treat him like shit and then divorce him for no reason what so ever. Also "redditor for 5 days that has their main account upvote their bile immediately" you aren't fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:49 PM
-1

No Fault divorce, Feminisms greatest victory in family law that has outright destroyed the concept of what is a marriage.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:23 PM
1

People incapable of being parents have no qualms about doing so. If course they are dooming their children, they dont care.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:21 PM
-1

Was that cathartic for you? Being a feminist alone does mot make someone evil, this seems like it would be news to you.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:11 PM
-3

You are honestly unhinged.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:08 PM
23

Agreed. These are sniviling white knights if a label has to be given. Being a feminist is not inherently bad and being an mra is not inherently good. This group however is worthy of scorn and derision.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:29 PM
36

http://site.nomas.org/lincoln-did-not-free-the-slaves-the-little-known-story-of-how-feminists-ended-slavery/ Almost positive this site is satire.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:35 PM
6

I have been fooled before but there is no way that's real.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:17 PM
6

You know...they could just call the police.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:39 PM
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/1swyol/please_read_the_sidebar/ You can't. It was nuked by a different mod and closed.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:16 PM
23

Theyellowrose is a cancer and the reason behind the SRS take over of that sub.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:00 PM
20

In the thread where the new rules were announced, the mod said banning things against women was ok and allowing things to be said about men was ok because of privilege, I shit you not.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:59 PM
4

I was in the stickied thread where he new rules were put in place. It was so blatantly sexist. The Mods got called on i and a different mod had to come in a nuke the thread. they banned all commentary negative to women while there was a front page thread with a woman calling her husband dick filled with misandrist garbage that was never removed. Just write the page off, social justice now runs that page.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:57 PM
16

Internalized misogyny guys. What evil will we bring upon the world next?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 03:31 PM
1

You areca deadbeat with 4 kids you can't support. Instead of doing something about it you just whine. You disgust me and your children deserve to hate you. Congrats on statistically ruining their lives, deadbeat
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:26 PM
0

Lay off having kids you can't support deadbeat
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:58 PM
3

Wtf 5 month necro? Your current boyfriend is still a deadbeat and nothing you said counters that. Maybe having four kids you can't care for and dating dead beats is the mistake here. Whine about that. Of course that would require self reflection and responsibility, rare traits apparently.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:33 PM
6

Something tells me you don't actually understand what the government shutdown is. Pro tip, the welfare, food stamps and disability are still going out.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:05 AM
9

DAE think women aren't people? Try harder.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:46 PM
17

Honestly, you are. Clearly a cartoon of what SRS thinks posters here are. You are with a false flag or pants on head retarded.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:58 PM
14

The false flags used to be creative, SRS/againstmensrights please go.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 07:50 PM
1

Are you on drugs? I believe things are as close now as they have ever been. Your argument is silly because white people were never the targets of institutionalized discrimination in this country based upon race.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 11:57 PM
2

Because being hit back is the same as being raped. Sounds legit.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:42 PM
28

haven't read, let me guess, he is black.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:26 PM
3

You comments about Christianity and atheism are pretty much nonsense.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:57 PM
8

Holy hell I just checked that hash tag. It might not be a troll after all, these people are insane.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:34 PM
25

After looking, I'm pretty sure that's a troll account.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:43 PM
2

Feminists are actually a minority, even of women. With the rise of Tumblr, they will alienate themselves.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:20 PM
0

Well, to that group everything is misogynistic and their opinions hold no value.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:40 PM
2

While this is true, most people making the claim suffer from massive conformation bias.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:58 PM
15

I am ok with this. Kids should be able to play with what they want. Of course, these kids probably cant read the signs and its all the parents. If a girl wants to play with guns, so what. If a boy wants to play with an ez bake oven, so what. I don't advocate the psychopaths that take this to mean there kids are trans and then push them in that direction with a personal agenda. Kids should do what is fun, as long as it is safe.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:34 PM
5

There will always be people that have it far worse than anyone posting on this board, that is not a reason to think that are rights don't matter. Its the "starving children in Africa argument" and it is and always has been bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:32 PM
13

This is an article of faith and cannot be argued with in a logical way. He believes there is a pay gap, even when there is no valid comparison in jobs. It makes no difference that he is comparing apples to Sherman tanks, articles of faith don't require facts to be believed. Its like the 1 in 4, or is it 1 in 3, possibly 5 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted. This is so far removed from logic and reason that it astounds me.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:23 PM
2

What the hell is this?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 04:23 AM
6

This is exactly how I feel. We aren't dealing with personal decisions, this is the insane counter to a parent that forces a child into sports for their own enjoyment, not the child.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 09:03 PM
0

If a teenager or adult decides to live as a woman, more power to them. That said, people should be civil but are free to not accept the lifestyle as long as there is nothing illegal. With children though, especially toddlers, it isn't a personal choice, its a parent with an agenda and I refuse to accept it as anything but what it is, abuse.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 08:18 PM
2

The threads on this in the "feminist" subs are interesting. They range from outrage to calling bs on it. You can tell which ones are grounded in reality
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:11 PM
0

"were not raiding" then proceeds to raid he thread. Stay classy /pol/
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:44 PM
-11

pol created it to make the SRS look bad. They then raided us and laid out every detail in this shit show of a thread. http://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/19853491#p19858157
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:44 AM
-5

I was referring to /r/factualfalcon.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:38 AM
0

implying I didnt copy and paste from your raid thread.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:12 AM
-5

You have been posting the same shit for at least 4-5 years that I can personally account for. Every time it has been discredited...you say the same shit again, repeat this for infinity. You have no fucking merits because you are part of a disinfo raid, a verifiable one http://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/19853491#p19858157 See that, its you. You don't feed trolls.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:11 AM
-2

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/19853491#p19859016 usernames of posters DiggerNick12 SchlomoShekelstein Another_showah goldztein ChaimGoldstein proudjoblesswomyn gtfo
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:04 AM
3

ok GidonSHOAwitz, You guys are far to obvious.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:59 AM
0

its a raid http://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/19853491#p19859016
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:52 AM
-4

I have been going to /pol/, /new/ for years. My username was Chooch51 and I only went to /sp/ and /pol/ or /new/. Get the fuck out of here with that. In fact, I am watching the fucking Factual Falcon General thread RIGHT NOW where you jackasses are typing everything you are doing.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:32 AM
5

No, Factual Falcon is a result of /r/niggers getting banned.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:28 AM
2

It was banned.....which is why the new factual falcon bird with the same crap was made. It is the same exact stuff but instead of calling them "fun nigger facts" they are called factual falcon. I shit you not.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:26 AM
0

Nah, yelling niggers, posting the same misleading stats, warning of the jewish conspiracy, circle jerking about how much better it would have been in the Nazi's won WW2 while jacking off to Ron Paul doesn't make you anything less than the filth you are.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:24 AM
2

I've been on /pol/ /new/ and even the bastard version from when they were kicked off of 4chan. Cosmic is 100% right
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:22 AM
-1

I really hope its just an SRS false flag, the first page of that sub is absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:12 AM
-1

It was originally /new/ on 4chan. It was deleted because they were THAT racist. Too racist for 4chan, let that think in. They were brought back to 4chan the second time because 4chan needed a place for all the hardcore racists to go so they would infect less of the site. It is essentially a quarantine for racists. This bird meme that we need to disavow immediately is just old /pol/ image macros with the dumb SRS bird saying them. Of the 25 threads on the first page for factual falcon, 19 are abo…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:09 AM
-1

its actually a very racist subs. Everything they report is slanted to make blacks look as bad as possible and has been repeated on /pol/ for years now.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:03 AM
-1

nah, they are openly racist and have been since /new/
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:01 AM
-2

factual falcon is just white rights by another name. Have you seen that sub? 19853491 sup jackasses.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:52 AM
22

Honestly, if and when these prove the wrong guy is behind bars, the state will and should be sued to oblivion.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:37 PM
18

This is how you maintain perpetual victimhood
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:34 PM
1

Yeah, kinda at a loss right now.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:48 PM
-1

Stat rape laws have to be concrete and gender blind.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:09 PM
6

Are you seriously argueing that a wealthy woman is less privileged than a average man? Oh wait of course you are
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:05 AM
3

Perhaps there are things stronger than having a penis...like wealth? This has been true since forever.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:54 AM
1

....so why in the hell would ANY white women need a safe space?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:48 AM
2

Personal responsibility don't real
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:31 PM
2

This should be the top post. We have no evidence either way.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:18 PM
6

Why not both?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:08 AM
26

It was actually 18 and 14. Her parents lied about pretty much everything during a media campaign.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:02 AM
10

While I agree in terms of men's rights, this sub had become a space for men to talk about issues. This really needs to stop getting posted on every thread.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:25 AM
3

No one is saying they will automatically leave, just that the government should in no way force a man to financially care for his wife's cheating behavior.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:00 PM
3

we could just give them to stable couples, they shouldnt care that the children are not theirs. What kind of horrible people doesnt want to invest 18 years and 100s of thousands of dollar into someone else mistake? I bet the patriarchy did this.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:07 PM
6

I suppose we should just take all babies in a room and let mothers to be draw straws for the one they get to take home. Please let me know the women that would be for this option. Biology don't real amirite?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:16 PM
13

You assumed that the vastly overused "victim blaming" meme was based on anything logical to begin with. It's a way to be totally absolved of all personal responsibility based on how they WANT the world to be. Its silly, treat it as so. edit-always replace www with np.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:01 PM
7

Best interests of someone else's child, think of the children if lying women? What about them?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:52 PM
7

That is how the vast majority if all internet threats are. Of course, if these silly wastes of time are against women they are worthy of national dialog and new laws.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:43 PM
6

Don't threaten to rape or kill someone on the way to your eight grade dance.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:41 PM
1

Explain please.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:26 PM
1

Men of every group make more than women of every group because they work more and women take more time off(not just for child reasons) and chose to work less. White women have a con going though, feminism is their tool.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:20 AM
3

I have no doubts that it is based mythology. The problem is that it is currently ingrained in our culture right now so when it started isn't relevant. There was a time when men automatically received custody, its not like that now and society views it completely differently now than then. Women and children first is very real in western society, just as never hit a girl and treating women better than you treat men. Its all bullshit forced gender roles. Whether or not it was practiced in the 1800…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:38 AM
37

11th grade model Congress in the year 2000. Everyone had to propose a bill that could go to the process. My bill was to allow paternity tests to be the determining factor in deciding child support. I thought it was an idea everyone could get behind because it was clearly righteous. Boy I was wrong and things got very ugly. By the end of it I started to think I was monster. After thinking it over, I realized how strong shaming tactics were in the absence of logic. I wasn't wrong, they were. It ma…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:07 AM
3

Its never been about equal work
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:30 PM
1

I was hoping you were joking Scalebrini style but no, your serious. You wanted to make some thisisthinprivilege kind of argument and everyone rejects it because its pants on head retarded.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:26 PM
0

A WNBA player could probably beat me in one on one, its irrelevant because I am not her competition. You aren't making a valid point.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:39 PM
12

Didn't go like you thought it would, did it?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:34 PM
3

Good. edit- Let the lawsuits begin, this was a complete violation of the Constitution that was propped by by both racism and fear/hatred of young men. The fact that many here defended it because it only effected "those" people still pisses me off to no end.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:39 PM
9

Its about power. If sex was cheap and easily attainable, women would immediately lose power on a grand scale.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:23 PM
3

Wth was this? Why would you pick random people from craiglist as a cross section of men? This is some Cosmo level trolling
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:29 AM
9

Legalized prostitution fixes this overnight. Men pay because women have the commodity. Sex is transactional, never let anyone tell you different. Women have to keep the supply low and the cost high
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:57 AM
16

On that day title 9 will be gutted
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:47 AM
79

Atheism+ is more religion than most religions.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:43 PM
3

Does anyone outside straw men actually day a woman got raped for her clothes? These slutwalkers seem like denerates
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:41 AM
-2

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-01-06/fbi-rape-definition-adds-men/52398350/1 It was changed. That was not the dictionary definition, I think its you that needs to pay attention.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:29 PM
-2

How about nope. Rape-the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:24 PM
-2

No, that's a personal decision though. People are free to judge people on their consensual actions. Judging someone for sexual activity is far more acceptable than judging based on uncontrollable factors like race, gender or disability. She made the choice and opened herself up to judgement.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:53 PM
7

Not at all. Say you only want alphas, no one bats an eye, refuse to date fat women or single mothers and your an ass. I just found it humorous.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:48 PM
-1

for something no one should be picked on According to who? The creep shaming, virgin shaming slut walkers? Is their a better authority?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:40 PM
-3

No one has to accept anyone else's actions. We are all free to make decisions on the content if someone else's character, this works in reverse as well.you may think I am a bad person for believing a person that has consensual sex with 4 people in the presence of witnesses then after dealing with the fallout of her own actions decides to ruin the lives of 4 people and make them and their families targets for mob justice as a slut devoid of any character. That is OK, you can believe that. I accep…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:35 PM
-1

Sorry, choice without responsibility is madness. She made the choice to bang 4 guys. She made the choice to falsely accuse 4 people and bring them down with her. These were her choices and no one else. If you can't handle punks calling you names like an adult, perhaps you aren't mature enough have sex with 4 people at a party.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:22 PM
7

Its literally a hypergamy sub. They seem to be serious though.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:40 PM
8

In a matter of years...could mean the year 3000
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:33 PM
-5

I liken it to freedom of speech, you are free to say whatever you want, you are not free from being judged for your action or free from being offended. There is nothing wrong with it, there is also nothing wrong with having your actions, done of free will judged.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:29 PM
-2

Slut a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuous. Blame the dictionary.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:26 PM
-5

The rape accusations happened because she was ashamed if her actions .
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:20 PM
-3

Sorry, you, me and anyone else posting in this sub is already labeled a misogynist. I was saying that it was much easier as a parent to believe their daughter was an innocent angel that was raped by those bad boys then consider that she was a willing participant on what mist objective people would consider slutty behaviour. Being a slut isn't positive and pretending we should celebrate it in anyone is idiotic. I will join your cause if you can convince your allies that male sexuality should not …
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:17 PM
-1

Between minors its wrong, not illegal. 1 in 4 American minors could and should be permanantly lab led sex offenders under such a policy. Of course the law is gender blind and would affect boys more.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:50 PM
2

Lizard people...and the Spanish Inquisition
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:35 PM
0

The charges are a response to a white knight driven mob because they can't prove the assault ever happened. This is not justice.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:33 PM
0

That's what happens now
/r/MensRights10/08/13 05:59 PM
-1

Its a witch hunt at this point because "someone has to pay" feels better than "our daughter wanted to be a slut until she decided she didn't want to be called a slut." The state will lose the case, money wasted, white knights will have their targets, no one wins.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 05:57 PM
-2

Cold as ice. I think you have to remove some of the emotion. I agree that feminism does promote being a whore then acting like a victim when people consider you a whore. Her parents were just being parents, they had a lot of bad parenting to make up for but they don't deserve hail time. We need to reflect on white knight internet revenge, that is a huge problem with this case. Outside of women lying about being raped of course.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 05:54 PM
1

Neither are true
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:47 AM
5

Question everything.....except completely unfounded rape allegation. Atheism is a complete joke of a movement
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:56 PM
7

because women should be believed no matter what, any deviance from this divine truth is a hate crime
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:05 PM
-8

Its wrong when women get away with doing the same exact thing We need to be consistent, there will.be a new story about a female teacher screwing a male student Amy minute. Sure the feminists are inconsistent hypocrites, nothing new
/r/MensRights08/08/13 11:30 PM
1

Over 9000 down votes.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:20 PM
2

no use bringing it up with feminists, they will just blame the patriarchy for making her act that way and the light sentence
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:07 AM
1

sooooooo egdy
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:36 PM
1

All those strawmen. I am black and have walked into bars and areas of town where I was FAR more likely to be assaulted then a random woman as likely to get raped. Feminists ARE against any situational awareness. No one is placing the responsibility for the attack on the victim, the victim does owe themself a duty of care, no matter how delusional you might be. How many raped involve large amounts of alcohol? I would go further but it would be victim blaming
/r/MensRights06/08/13 10:50 PM
1

This is virgin shaming, the equivalent of slut shaming and the primary feminist strategy.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:20 PM
1

That has to be a joke.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:02 PM
4

There really is no logic or reason on this subject with feminists. Any prevention is seen as victim blaming and rape apology. You can't argue with someone devoid if logic and only appealing to emotion.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:25 AM
8

Concern troll elsewhere. You would already be banned from feminist subs
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:16 AM
2

There are ways to say that without being racist. Also the central premise was wrong, Sharp ton is not a leader in the black community.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:34 PM
1

As you can see by the massive down voting, even here there are people with a vested interest in seperation.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:24 PM
1

It us a part of the American community. America has many segments that make up our country. I enjoy a good German festival in Philly, Irish weekend in Wildwood, Puerto Rican day parade in NYC, and an Italian festival in my hometown every year. You are correct that there is money to be made in seperation, probably not from who you think
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:29 AM
1

There isn't one, like their isn't a prime white leader. There hadn't truly been a black leader since MLK, Obama generally tries very hard to not be seen as the black president(outside of the Martin quote). If I had to pick one I would probably say Ben Jealous, head of the NAACP, he has had his own issues but the Organization is still widely respected in the black community.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:52 AM
0

It was just to show that neither is or has been a leader among their race. The silly argument that 100k blacks(at best on his best day) that listen to him make him a national black leader because white people say so is ludicrous. Oh, and here is another post to be downvoted by the "race realists"
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:12 AM
-1

The casual racism on this sub is becoming a major turn off for me. It makes us all look bad. Go ahead and downvote.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:40 PM
1

Look at the top rated post in this thread. I am not saying Duke represents white people, I am saying its just as absurd a notion because there is no actual proof of it.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:25 PM
-1

Getting on tv=represents black people Is that all it takes? "He didn't represent the majority of white people back then, and he sure doesn't now." This is what I am saying about Sharpton and getting downvoted for it.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:09 PM
-3

How many would disagree if I labeled him a leader among white people? I would hope the vast majority. Somehow white people get to pick supposed black leaders. Sharpton has been a joke for decades.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:02 PM
-5

-2 is alot? http://www.mediaite.com/tv/friday-ratings-cnns-blitzer-beats-msnbcs-matthews-and-sharpton-in-demo-and-total-viewers/ Sharpton got 472k TOTAL viewers. Lets ignore the fact that MSNBC's audience if OVERWHELMINGLY white and assume that every viewer is black, just for arguments sake. This would be for a nationally televised show that anyone could watch. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke In 1991 David Duke received 671,009 votes, or 55% of white voters just in he state of Louisiana.…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 06:32 PM
-10

This is so fucking racist, I almost hope you are a againstmensrights troll Neither Jessie or Al have been relevant outside of being appointed leaders by people like yourself for decades
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:44 PM
-12

This shit really pisses me off. The ONLY people that see Sharpton as a leader in the black community are white people that tried to appoint him so like yourself. Fucking stop it, its bullshit and not backed up by anything. What % of black people watch his show or show up to his events? There are more white people that VOTED for David Duke than watch this means show. Fucking stop it.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:43 PM
2

So she is saying one thing while objective reality says another.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:41 PM
1

very true.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:05 PM
20

did you read it? They are paying women more than men. Women are also being paid time that they aren't even working when men are not. This is outrageous.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:24 AM
5

This is the end game
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:22 AM
2

Let me help you out "Young black males commit a disproportionate amount of violent crimes"-this statement is a valid observation based on data that can't really denied "Black men think x"-this observation has no factual backing, you have no idea what other people are thinking. So why would you assume to know what a vast a complex group of individuals was thinking? I am only an authority on what I think.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:43 PM
2

I would never assert myself as an authority on all of any groups thought patterns, and no one else should either
/r/MensRights01/08/13 07:26 PM
4

Jessie and Al rode MLK's legacy as far as they could, haven't been relevant to any significant portion of black Americans since the Reagan administration. You don't get yo decide who black leaders are, and you sure as hell don't get to pick two race hustling self appointed ministers with no educational background as leaders of educated black men. David Duke won the majority of the white vote in Louisiana governor's race, can I declare him your leader? You telling me what and how I think is the o…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 07:24 PM
0

White man tells black men how and what he was taught. This truly is fascination, I am learning so much about myself in this conversation. You're argument is that educated black men cannot think for themselves because they are either stupid or willfully ignorant enough to not have opinions based on their specific upbringing or life experiences. Let me guess, white men think for themselves and sweeping generalizations aren't needed or even acceptable?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:14 PM
2

I have seen plenty, the media narrative is what drove the Trayvon hysteria. If the media has you convinced it is legal to kill young black men defending themselves, hysteria will follow. That has nothing to do with this conversation. Though.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:55 PM
1

White man tells educated black man what educated black men believe. If your argument is that academics adhere to a philosophy, say that. What you said was incorrect.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:52 PM
1

You are confusing feminists, race hustlers, career politicians and people in academia with educated black men. There is no monolithic thought pattern among educated black men. There is a strong likelihood that I can relate to this issue more than you can.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:04 PM
2

Nope.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:30 PM
0

This is Baltimore and the quality of employees one would expect to find in Baltimore. Government jobs in a place like Baltimore are a magnet. I won't touch the subjectvof black women outside of saying I love my mother and my wife(who is half), both of whom hate the culture of failure fucked up priorities.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:31 AM
1

Um....yes?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:21 AM
-1

If this is the case I think it is, the department was crooked from the top down and hired shitty guards that were willingly working with the gangs outside the prison for profit. Hiring low quality people is never a good idea
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:20 AM
-2

Actually, gangs mean the prison.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 10:36 PM
6

Daycare is the biggest scam going. Its incredibly expensive. An expectation of 1200 is really steep for raising a child though.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:44 PM
35

This is the problem
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:06 PM
16

Facts don't real shitlords, they feel the oppression
/r/MensRights28/07/13 08:00 PM
6

There is a thing called tact. I am not saying the doctor should just put on a Maury mask and yell "YOU ARE NOT THE FATHER." On the other hand, every hospital has security staff and psychological staff on the premises to deal with everyone involved. Actually, once you think about it, a hospital is the best place to realize someone just took a total shit on your life. Your point is silly.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:08 PM
11

Its foolish for women to lie about paternity. People are foolish.The hospital doing it would be the easiest way since children are poked ad prodded to no end when they are born to test for various things.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:37 PM
14

I know YOU don't, feminsist do. Just do a search of paternaty tests on reddit.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:30 PM
4

the problem is a teach girls not to accuse would be met with protests.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:07 PM
23

families based on lies and fraud should not be held in high regard.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:50 PM
27

well, the first argument that would say is that it is misogynistic because it assumes women are lying. The second argument would be that it is misogynistic because of something else, this would continue for a few more reasons. Finally they would say "what about he children." Just do a search for paternity testing on reddit if you think I am making it up.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:33 PM
23

This. The court doesn't care, they just want someone to pay.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:20 PM
31

Feminists would fight tooth an nail against it. See one.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:14 PM
1

Because most people do them wrong then claim things like they are out of shape and can do 57 in a minute to mock someone that has to do it legitimately. Its like starting at the half point on a hole in golf and wondering why people playing by PGA rules aren't getting pars. Its asinine
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:35 PM
6

Standard pushups? Not likely.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:06 AM
1

FBI=/=NSA or NYPD(only applies if you are a minority male)
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:05 AM
2

sadly this. Doing 57 actual standard pushups in a minute would be damn impressive.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:04 AM
5

Being born in poverty is statistically screwing that child over. There is nothing positive about being a teen mom or dad
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:13 PM
1

NYPD...
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:30 PM
1

So, you have a Nas song, a pamphlet from McDonald's that requires 70 hours worked that you includes just not paying some bills , mythology about social mobility and an anecdote from your family. You got me, every study on social mobility is wrong, the thorough debunking of Horatio Alger(the man that started the myth) is bs because you want it to be. No reals, only feels. Working hard can.increase your chances of success, it had far less of an impact than who your parents are, how much access to …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:06 PM
1

So, you have a Nas song, a pamphlet from McDonald's that requires 70 hours worked that you includes just not paying some bills , mythology about social mobility and an anecdote from your family. You got me, every study on social mobility is wrong, the thorough debunking of Horatio Alger(the man that started the myth) is bs because you want it to be. No reals, only feels. Working hard can.increase your chances of success, it had far less of an impact than who your parents are, how much access to …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:06 PM
2

Horatio Alger was a myth. In actual America, not the fantasy land you want it to be, social mobility is the exception, not even close to the rule. Your just world fallacy where guard work equals success is a joke and has been statistically proven to be so. Its very easy to come from a "my family did x in the 50s" to try to ridicule people from completely different situation and a global economy. Its easy to justify and even celebrate the failings of poor people when you can just say its because …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:29 PM
3

I have read the whole chain, you clearly believe in a just world fallacy and wonder why those lesser human beings do what they do. There are reasons for higher crime, higher unemployment and underemployment in urban areas. It isnt as simple as picking yourself up by your boot straps. there was a study done recently that determined growing up poor was a bigger detriment to a child than being a crack baby.http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-22/news/40709969_1_hallam-hurt-so-called-crack-babies-fund…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:11 PM
3

Its Cosmo, trolling is what they do
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:15 AM
3

It just do happens your personal liberties are not on the chopping block, shocking
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:07 AM
2

There is no young black male community. There is a young urban male culture that is toxic. White kids, Hispanic kids etc from the same area dress the same way and also commit far more crime than they should. You are looking at the symptoms of a problem and wondering why the symptoms exist while ignoring the real problems.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:04 AM
3

I do, but the problem is the justice system itself is not fair. You combine unfair selection for searches with a justice system far more likely to throw young black males in prison, which leads to less opportunity, which leads to a cycle of prison, which leads to young black males committing most of the crime. Everything I'd connected, these searches need to be eliminated with the war on drugs.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:59 AM
7

If only men are arrested for rape, men must commit all rape. Do you get it now? Do you understand why its bs or is expecting empathy silly?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:49 AM
11

Here, of all places we have people quoting crime stats and ignoring the context. If yousre only arresting black males.....black males will be the ones convicted...or did the justice system all of a sudden become fair?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:02 AM
0

Already answered above. Maybe my phone formatting changes it but I read 7 paragraphs of pure crazy. After rereading it I got the point, the crazy went on for way to long for the average person to make it through
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:23 PM
2

Guilty as charged
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:17 PM
10

I didn't, after reading it I agree with him. To be fair I stop reading radfem crap when it gets to the "what the actual fuck am I reading" phase as well
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:16 PM
-10

What the actual fuck did I just read? Fuck that guy, what a bullshit , sexist, piece of filth I can't align myself with that clown Edit. After re reading I understand, I still believe there is too much crazy for too long and most people won't make it through that crazy to get to the actual point of the article.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:02 PM
5

white woman falsely accuses a black man, she needs to be in prison like he would have been if no for the video. Women do this because the legal system has promoted it.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:57 AM
2

It would be hilarious.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:40 PM
1

Well, those people care idiots, moving on them.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:28 PM
1

Who up votes this in founded nonsense?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:29 PM
0

Not sure why this post is getting killed. There is a direct line k between abortion and lower violent crime rates. Many people predisposed ( parents of poor single mothers) were simply never born Never mind, didn't see the lead based paint, bombs away
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:18 PM
2

Would young females have been made to testify?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:20 PM
0

The what if the sexes were reversed is a valid concern here. The fact that these feminists have zero empathy as long as it is a man is telling.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:12 PM
0

"I think it’s a problem telling women they’re wrong for going public what happened to them. That too is part of rape culture. absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:05 PM
4

because women attract males who spend the most money if there are women there.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:00 PM
2

I donn't know you, but from every post I have ever seen you make, one can only assume you are a person devoid of all honesty and twist anything someone that might disagree with you on any issue into says into some kind of horrific anti women statement. In short, if this was a feminist sub, your post you just made would be minus 70 right now. In that thread, they are down voting me personally into oblivion, nothing I said was offensive. Then again I am using the standard of a rational person.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:05 PM
-5

Go back to againstmensrights troll.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:25 PM
50

I just had a post hit -75 for suggesting women should initiate contact. This is not dealing with reasonable people.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:56 PM
-2

Maybe fear of this is why feminist subs are run like fascist states. They are what they fear
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:44 PM
1

That bs baby boy abortion post reeked of this
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:15 PM
7

Your body, your choice. If you didn't want a child you should have prevented . Thus is the actual reason feminists give against male reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:44 PM
10

Troll alarm overload. Too obbious
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:22 PM
22

This. No way this is real
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:20 PM
10

I get the same feeling. This reeks of a "now switch the sexes" straw man that would miss the point that everyone in the story is human garbage making shit decisions
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:19 PM
15

Calling troll for on this. Nope nope and mope
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:16 PM
6

I sold for years. Men generally dominate direct sales because female consumers generally make the purchasing decisions. from my experiences in sales, female salespeople, especially attractive ones have a hard time with wives
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:10 PM
-1

Your sources don't compare black women to white men in any way shape or fashion. That was the point you were trying to make with sources that do not back that up. Down vote more, just try to be honest.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:40 PM
1

Break it down by race and gender. The 63 is totally dominated by the bonus to black l males.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:53 PM
-7

That is completely wrong.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:50 PM
3

Alternet and Slate are in a contest to see who can be the bigger feminist echo chamber, stop giving them page views.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:53 AM
1

This asking "why" a young person would commit such acts was called evidence that we live in a rape culture when it came to Stubenville. Just like Stubenville, the media asked the question and the feminists collectively lost their shit. Why are they quiet when the same thing happens, but the perp is a terrorist? The truth is there is no such thing as terrorist culture in the west, just like there is no such thing as rape culture in the west. Shockingly(not really) the places that have actual rape…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:48 PM
3

I love how fast this was deleted from feminism. Bless demmian, praise be upon him
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:20 PM
1

..did you read the second part about not cleaning up after them. The only way to stop that behavior is not to reward it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:32 PM
1

And I agree with your first point. I didn't say why they grow out of it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 12:16 PM
3

Well, you sound young. In reality what you are noticing that younger females are attracted to he bad boy archetype. Most of them grow out of it. Of course, that doesn't help your situation will just lead to you becoming more bitter. All I can say is enjoy your life the best you can and do not define it by being with a woman. Also, later in life never ever ever pick up after one of these bad boys mistakes. Either by picking up the slack of being a father to their bastards or trying to fix the emo…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:48 AM
2

I am all about equality, why would I do anything but welcome it?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:00 AM
0

"When it says "you may not discriminate based on sex" what it means is "you may not discriminate against women" just like when it says "you may not discriminate based on race" what it means is "you may not discriminate against any color but white." None of this is true. Not a single word of it. You want it to be true to feed a victim complex but it isn't true. There are genuine problems with enforcement in some areas, your claims are complete BS and hyperbole.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:48 PM
0

Also, here is another post to down vote, child.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:52 PM
0

That wasn't the argument. You know that though. The reason there are no laws explicitly discriminating against black people is because of the 14th amendment and civil rights acts, ever heard of Jim Crow laws. Held made a claim not backed by facts and then tried to back it with a quote from wikipedia that was misleading at best. He was wrong, I care about accuracy, spreading ignorance even if it supports a view I hold dear is still wrong. There is nothing worse than a bad argument for a view I ho…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:48 PM
-1

Yes, impotant rage =laughing just like not the law=the law.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:28 PM
-1

"Regardless of whether or not the law...." well I have nothing more to add to that. Ad Homs and impotent rage is better left go the srs
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:12 PM
4

So why would males only be acceptable but men only would not? This isn't from the government, this is a shitty organization making a bad flyer.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:39 PM
-4

Quoting wikipedia, LET ME LAUGH HARDER. it forbids discrimination based on sex, it does not make women a protected class. Step your game up before you attack, idiot.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:09 PM
5

Federal housing laws govern advertising for real estate.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:32 PM
9

This. Op is either a troll or an idiot
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:09 PM
-1

Women aren't a protected class. You don't know what a protected class actually is.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:55 PM
0

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/renters-rights-book/chapter5-2.html He has provided not a damn bit of proof and I have the cert he is studying for.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:54 PM
2

I really would like to see them.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:46 PM
-1

Basically, you can't discriminate based on sex in real estate.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:44 PM
6

I have a real estate license and OP is full of shit.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:28 PM
17

I do, and he is a bigot. That doesn't mean I love him less. He is from a different era, he is still a bigot though.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 04:44 PM
18

Maybe this person, like your grandmother is a bigot.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:59 PM
0

Women are historically great jurors for defense. This isn't true if the defendant is a woman. Having 5 white women and a Hispanic woman decide if its OK to stalk, start a fight and then when losing shoot a black make should set off alarms. I have been stared down by enough white women to know they thought I was guilty of something
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:51 PM
1

I'm pro choice, these guys seem like douchebags with faulty sociopathic logic.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:53 PM
2

Allowing Nazis to adopt Jewish children would probably be child endangerment,
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:28 PM
12

There are reasons besides "being Nazis". Douchebag move by the media, mom is clearly a Nazi as well, being a Nazi isn't a reason to take children away
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:57 PM
11

Are you joking? What if you do all of that alone. There is nothing worse than being around people all the time but an alone emotionally
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:45 AM
6

Karen Smith assured me this doesn't happen
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:36 AM
5

Define enthusiastic consent, I will be in the corner with popcorn.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:08 PM
1

As long as prostate exams and the like are covered I have no issue. Women should pay more for health insurance because they use more, even ignoring pregnancy.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:04 PM
5

“Nobody would report sexual assault needlessly because it is a gruelling process to go through.” ....I don't...I can't......wut
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:44 AM
3

are parodies illegal in Canada?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:30 AM
2

Its exactly what you said.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:21 AM
1

So would killing every white male with stock. That would "work" to end white collar crime. Its insane and we have laws that trump "it would work" fallacies.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:52 PM
2

Why would I want to model anything after a group running an apartheid regime? You are willing to accept legal discrimination based on uncontrollable factors FOR OTHER PEOPLE. Shocking that you would not be subject to second class status or a presumption of guild ad lessor quality of life in your little shit show. Its very easy to advocate for lesser freedoms for other people isn't it?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:46 PM
2

Rapist that are men are the rule, not the exception. Most men are not rapists and most black men are not felons. There are no positives to discriminatin against populations for the actions of a minority
/r/MensRights09/07/13 07:58 PM
2

Perhaps hiring hs grads with connections isn't the best way to field a police force then.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:47 PM
1

I objected to your use of the terms rule an exception
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:43 PM
7

How many black males commit murder though and where are the relevant statistics. This is like saying men commit the vast majority of rapes so each should be treated like a criminal, sounds shitty doesn't it?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:00 PM
2

Black males being criminal isn't a majority though. Black makes that aren't felons actually is the rule, as most of them aren't felons.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:57 PM
28

It depends, is Demmian going to be a mod? I think MRAs would be up for it, feminists would not because of the lack of authoritarian control over a debate
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:01 PM
1

Seriously, you are fucking retarded. There is nothing else I can even say to you, you have traveled beyond dumb and gone full retard. Pro choicers are not the ones that bring PBA up. Pro lifers do. Pro lifers do not bring rape up, pro choicers do. I can deal with responding to dumb mis-characterizations for only so long. You miss the central point from the begining and just kept missing it in every damn post.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:27 PM
2

Last time, because you only see what you want to see. PBA is not the holy grail for pro choicers, for the eighth or ninth time. It is the holy grail(ultimate) argument AGAINST the pro choice movement and is used by pro lifers. Rape is the holy grail(ultimate) argument used against pro lifers by the pro choice movement. The President does not support PBA. what the hell are you even talking about. I am not even a pro lifer, I am stating the arguments both sides use against eachother, if you can ta…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:21 PM
3

How does giving advice on how to stop violent stranger rape have any impact on acquaintance rape? Honestly the best advice for both is don't get black out drunk.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:16 PM
5

half the comments in that thread are deleted. Anything giving common sense advice for every other crime in existence was deleted and attacked mercilessly. You aren't helping yourself
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:46 PM
6

So basically you are saying it didnt happen, but if it did happen I did something to deserve it. Sure sounds like vict......wait a second.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:38 PM
3

"If that's true, its probably for some other reason." no, it really isnt. Demmian and his ironfist have no time for any mitigating factors. Everything is victim blaming, have you ever actually been there?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:25 PM
7

I am banned from askfeminists, feminism and feminisms for asking.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:11 PM
3

Dont go to Camden with money hanging out of your wallet at 2am. This is just sound advice, if you chose to ignore it because you think magic will protect you, you probably already are a feminist
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:09 PM
1

no, you will,they will banhammer and yell victim blaming
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:02 PM
0

"They are not advocating that women have no responsibility to mitigate harm in the first place, thats a misunderstanding that mra's keep beating." Yes, yes they are. You keep saying that but you know irs garbage. I reiterate the challenge I made to you the last time you tried this nonsense. Go to feminisms or feminism and ask them proactive steps women should take. You will be BANHAMMERED immediate.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:57 PM
15

obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:52 PM
2

"These laws started getting pushed in earnest as a result of the banning of PBA and it is for this reason that pro choicers were so animated at the time" even in your refusal to read what I wrote, you prove my point. Both side use obscure fanatics on the other side to prove their point. Oh there were most certainly bodily autonomy autonomy believer that felt until the baby was out of a woman she had the right to abort.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:48 PM
0

2-you are correct 3-you are correct, no because of blaming, everyone react differently to traumatic situations 4-you are correct 5-you are correct 6-you are correct The interesting part is 2-6 are probably almost universally agreeable to 80-90% of the people in the United States. Feminists will disagree but they will find victim hood in anything if they look hard enough. Number 1 is where you and feminists are completely wrong. As a society will can advise people on what to do to protect themsel…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:41 PM
6

Being involved=/=objecting to idiotic things that do nothing but infantilising women while demonizing men. If you don't think rape prevention which isnt at all rape prevention and does nothing but demonize men, especially when backed by feminist inspired law is not a Men's Rights issue then you can get the hell out.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:08 PM
3

sounds legit
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:05 PM
2

You have elected to not read what I actually wrote and that is your prerogative. I read over everything I wrote and it is clear. Both sides use the worst possible example of the other to prove their side is right. You freely admit that PBA are and were a real thing that was championed by the fringes of the pro choice movement. The belief in bodily autonomy is what lead to this. The existence of PBA was an argument used by pro lifers to attack the belief in bodily autonomy. This was their highest…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:02 PM
9

You are expecting decency and respect from a rapist. That is an error of judgement. You owe it to yourself to take precautions because rapists don't give a shit about you and never will.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:57 PM
9

Here is the problem. A rapists owes you literally nothing. Full stop.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 06:21 PM
2

that wasn't my claim, at all. The holy grail comment was because it is used as a conservation killer and unassailable argument, just like pro choicers use the rape argument. Its the end of the argument because there isn't a response to it that is palatable. For example Pro Choicer: "What about rape" Pro Lifer--Nothing said here will help, nothing Pro Lifer:"Well what about partial birth abortions?" Pro Choicer--Nothing said here will help. Both of these are very rare occurrences but are used to …
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:47 PM
2

So you claim I was wrong while admitting partial birth abortions are a real thing Only a zealot would not see how ridiculous of a stance that is. I have already addresses people like yourself.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:13 PM
2

The body autonomy one is exactly right. Saying it isn't doesn't make it so. The problem with this issue is that both sides only see the reasonable arguments from their side and not the nutjobs that follow the beliefs to their natural destinationl Have you really never heard of arguments for partial birth abortions, seriously? It is the holy grail of the pro like movement, like "what about rape" is for the pro choice movement.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:20 AM
1

I would like to point about that rape is not actually being made illegal anywhere. If it did, I do believe this would happen(false accusations to acquire abortions)
/r/MensRights06/07/13 03:57 PM
2

I will address your points as laid out. Th first one is the rape exceptions. Pro-life people generally don't really believe in them but it is political suicide to say so. If you believe it is murder, then you believe it is murder no matter what and the rape exception s purely a political tactic because literally the easiest defense of abortion is to say,"what about rape." Now, pro choicers share in this political hypocrisy, by logical extension bodily autonomy is the belief that a woman has tota…
/r/MensRights06/07/13 03:46 PM
2

You do realize that it is possible that many pro life people feel abortion is legitimately murder right? I have a couple quick responses to the OP, no state is going to be outlawing abortion and most of the talk on the subject is pure hyperbole. Texas for example is trying to make abortions illegal after 20 months, not make abortion illegal. I am morally against abortion because the only legitimate reason to support abortion is bodily autonomy, it isnt a moral or particularly positive reason but…
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:54 AM
0

This is silly. Womens events draw more attention and ads.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 12:56 PM
-1

Paternity fraud is A-OK
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:57 PM
1

Being nice is the worst thing you can.be outside of a rapist.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:11 AM
13

rules are patriarchy shitlords
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:24 PM
-6

What? If course they can stop being stupid.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:20 PM
1

Actually, you are full of crap. If you have the child in your possession, a lawyer would take the case because its easy money. If you live in the United States, lawyers love cases like this because it only requires basic paperwork and minimal court appearances. You also don't need 5-10k for a family court hearing where you already have possession of the child. Nothing you are saying makes legal sense in the real world.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:18 PM
0

Did they file it under things that "totally" happened like I just did? Your problem could be solved with an ex parts hearing, how stupid and uninformed do you think we are here?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:32 AM
1

If its a private club that isn't open to the public, I.have no.issue. I will never play at Augusta, it isn't because I'm black, its because its a private club that has that right.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:54 AM
-1

....OK lazy it is. Hiring a lawyer would have lowered that 40% to zero You combine ignorance and laziness, two traits that are unwelcome anywhere, not just here. If she lives with you, you don't even need a lawyer, going down to the court house and asking for the paperwork would help I hope you are just incredibly misinformed and not an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:28 AM
0

No not really, legally speaking. If your daughter lived with you, the only thing true for sure is that you are lazy. A lawyer would have done you wonders.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:12 AM
1

I agree 100%
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:44 PM
14

Title 9 itself is the problem
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:40 PM
-3

Actually it does. He has bills and obligation to his children. It clearly counts as a paycheck by any definition. We don't know his finances, we just know he won't pay, we know nothing more.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:12 PM
-3

He isnt being screwed over, he has a steady paycheck for the rest of his life at or above the median earnings for someone with his age and education, probably more than someone at his age ad education. Being in the military does not mean you are better than someone else in the eyes of the law.He is a deadbeat by definition.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:18 PM
-2

"I think it's because even though OP's boyfriend was making as much of the child support payments as he could on a limited income" We don't know this, we don't know this at all. For all we know OPs boyfriend is blowing his money on drugs or even the OP. The myth that disabled military are poor is just that, a myth.http://www.military.com/benefits/veterans-health-care/va-disability-compensation-rates.html Once again, what does her current boyfriend having a drug problem have to do with OPs boyfri…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:55 AM
7

This has almost nothing to do with feminism based on the facts presented.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:30 AM
-3

This comment shouldn't be down voted. Her boyfriend is a deadbeat, him being military and his ex wives boyfriend being on drugs ate immaterial
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:29 AM
0

What does her current husbands drug problems have to do with your boyfriend not paying child support?
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:11 AM
3

I am for this law for selfish reasons. Have you ever seen ladies rooms at big events? Huge lines, fighting and general insanity. Men's bathrooms even at busy ball games work like a well oiled machine with everyone aware of the proper unwritten rules.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:47 AM
0

Yeah, soft sciences aren't science.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:50 PM
0

You keep saying the word science like you know what it means
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:49 PM
1

I never made such a claim. My sides were busting because someone called psychology, anthropology and sociology sciences, for which my sides have been irreparably harmed.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:30 PM
0

DAE joke majors with joke job prospect and little to no societal benefits? You can add, person working in the real world to that list.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:27 PM
1

" typical psychology, anthropology and sociology classes." "Science" OH GOD MY SIDES
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:16 AM
3

" typical psychology, anthropology and sociology classes." MY SIDES
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:27 PM
1

rapists?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:04 PM
3

did you mean to post that, looks like flagging the dust completely destroyed your argument in that thread.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:01 PM
3

I am excitedly waiting for those feminists groups that offer something different. Surely you didn't just pull it out of your ass with no proof to back it up right? Please deliver Mytecacc, I believe in you.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:55 PM
3

So your argument is now NAFALT? This is worse than the previous having no argument. Please point me to these feminist activist groups.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:49 PM
10

Most MRAs would fit the definition feminists would like feminism to have. The problem is that definition is not reflective of reality.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:40 PM
3

Actually, teaching your children to avoid dangerous situations is just called parenting. This goes from not sicking forks in outlets, not touching hit stoves, not taking candy from strangers, not being around drunk people(how many good things happen around groups of drunk young people, regardless of sexual makeup) etc. Drunks dont want advice, we give it to them. People that smoke dont want advice, we give it to them. Pregnant mothers who partake in the two examples above, dont want advice, we g…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:32 PM
2

Whose jurisdiction is it to inform people that not oweing yourself a duty of care and not mitigating danger is important? If everyone already knew this we would be never have to have this conversation
/r/MensRights21/06/13 02:42 PM
3

So, you make a claim that you can't back up or lift a finger to prove in the face of all existing evidence. My daughter will never ask me for rape prevention advice and you could bet your ass she will be getting some The same goes for my sons, mitigating potential danger is in no way offensive and feminists have list all perspective.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 02:40 PM
3

So, you won't post any then to prove your theory? OK then.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 02:17 PM
3

Experiment time then. Post some common sense mitigation advice in feminisms or feminism and let us watch the results.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 02:04 PM
2

Mitigating potential danger is something that everyone should strive for. Pretending humans shouldn't is asinine and should not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:27 PM
6

I think this is supposed to say that the victim is no at fault, which is true. Feminists have gone off the rails with the victim blaming meme. It is never the victims fault if they get raped, it IS however their fault if they put themselves in a bad position and got raped. Once again the rape is not their fault, the placement in the position most certainly is. Sorry SRS, getting black out drunk around strange people makes you at fault for putting yourself in that position, it does not make you a…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 12:04 PM
2

So ugh....what did she say?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:21 PM
3

Most of these are blatant trolls.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:51 PM
2

The only hypothetical is a world where the law will be applied equally, your hypothetical. I am only dealing in the real world with the actual laws. I realize asking for equality under the law is so insane, what sub am I on anyway.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:15 AM
2

Oh, you assume the two are not the same thing. That is where you make your error. The law has to treat everyone equally or it is fundamentally unjust. Now, you could fight to change the law and I might support you, if you just want to accept the current state of a sexist interpretation of the law, you are just fundamentally wrong.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:16 AM
1

Well there is zero chance of that ever happening, I will take equality under the law.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 01:19 AM
19

Then you have a problem with this. The problem is the law is not enforced equally, there is no bigger equal rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:34 PM
3

being an absentee father is terrible. Being a single mother means you child is statistically at a major disadvantage in life which one of these choices is societal acceptable?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:28 PM
2

Feminism in the west pretty much fits the definition of a religion
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:47 PM
1

In context he is right, women do make less then men. He ignores that men and women don't do the same jobs.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:14 PM
5

Not really. Crime statistics are based one arrests. Which one of these thieves would have been arrested? Do you see the problem?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 07:43 AM
11

Nah, VAWA is bull shit and if this woman wasnt completely unstable, simply saying her husband yells at her she would have gotten her divorce and destroyed him.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 09:04 PM
63

too bad, all she had to do was accuse him of domestic abuse.....which she will no doubt do anyway
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:29 PM
2

HERE HERE. Well, I look forward to women creating games with strong female characters that then get attacked for just being men in dresses. You ca't win with that crowd, there is no point to trying.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:42 AM
3

I kinda meant right now, as in currently.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 09:21 PM
3

Can anyone supply examples of a company paying women that are in the same job, with the same experience and same hours where women are actually paid less?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 07:17 PM
0

A boycott is an active effort to get others not to buy it. Just not buying it or giving attention to it will hurt more, just like pretty much every girl power comic ever
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:14 PM
3

Non issue. Just don't buy it. Thst is how you handle things like this, not through boycotts and screeching
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:09 AM
0

It has a higher likelihood. Access to abortion has caused many people with a high propensity to violence to never be born. The dramatic drop in crime starting in the 90s is highly likely to be a by product of the legalization of abortion, which could counteract much of the single mother problem.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:48 AM
1

Lets break this down. There are more single mothers which skew the numbers. Women completing college more than men, which change the numbers. The more interesting point in the article is that women lead households make more money. This make sense because if the woman is working, the man is also likely to be working, 2 incomes>one generally I have seen some coverage of this that us pretty silly. The wage gap myth is back, with zero evidence. I am still waiting for someone to show me proof of wome…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:52 PM
1

so because the mothers are single....they dont count as a household?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:29 PM
1

The "will never happen one" is the rapist successfully suing for custody or parental rights. Please read what I said and what it was referencing
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:19 PM
1

I would like to be clear that I do not think feminists as a group are supporting Hunt. Her support is coming from average people (who mostly have been duped by her parents lies) who see but accept a staggering double standard. Allowing for an exception because she is a girl or lesbian is wrong and just guarantees that women will not be convicted while mean continue to be. This is a men's rights issue because it deals with equal protection for men and women.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:07 PM
6

In the same state, same county, same District attorney? No, there really isnt a better comparison. It gives his age, she was 14 and he was 18, "Authorities say a northern Arizona man accused of impregnating a 14-year-old girl was arrested in Florida Wednesday." "Cody Williams-Claxton, 18" Its an exact parallel, except for genitalia.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:30 AM
13

The Kaitlyn Hunt situation. This is the same exact situation, in the same exact county, of the same exact state with the same laws. The only difference is, Hunt is a women which has sparked a nationwide story about how unfair these laws are.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:41 AM
1

Its a play on words. In those states,there are not specific laws against it. That doesnt mean it will ever happen, and it has never happened. Did they cite a specific case of it ever happening? There is a reason.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:41 PM
2

The first scenario is one of those possible but no way in hell could you find an example of it happening situations. he second has happened ad been documented.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:37 PM
5

He doesnt even have to be an adult.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:35 PM
2

Use title 9. They have to provide a male equivalent if this uni is in the USA
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:06 PM
-2

This article isn't insane because of feminism, in fact the article never claims feminism. The problem is the offensive elitism. Most people work for an hourly wage and capping their hours would have dire consequences. This is of course a non factor to someone that has had nannys.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 02:51 AM
-1

Someone post this to feminism and feminisms
/r/MensRights27/05/13 10:19 PM
5

If she is found innocent when the facts and the law are 100% against her, this helps no one but her. Laws will never be changed if women can escape them and men cannot.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:12 AM
20

the system will never get fixed as long as 50+% of the population is immune to shitty laws.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 04:32 PM
6

The fact that the left and so many idiots are rallying behind and defending sex with children as a result of this is truly sickening. I can't believe my part is supporting this. Daily Kos is a cesspit of rape apologist an excuses as to why its ok for women and not for men. I don't think I can legitimately take these people seriously anymore.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:32 PM
1

That sounds interesting. What state is that?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:47 AM
-72

Pretty sure that is assault and you would be spending a great deal of time from your children. "He said mean words" is not a defense.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:04 PM
0

18 and 14. The parents of Kate are lying and have been from the start. She turned 18 August. The 2 began seeing eachother in November when they were 18 and 14. There is ZERO evidence that the 14 year olds parents are homophobic. This has been a media campaign waged by Hunts parents full of lies. Affadavit here http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/05/21/us/hunt-arrest-affidavit.html Interview with the parents here http://cbs12.com/news/top-stories/stories/vid_7597.shtml You have been bamoozled
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:07 PM
6

incorrect. The girl turned 18 in August, the charges were filed in February, the younger girl just turned 15 in May. The parents are con artists.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:03 PM
5

nope. They were 14 and 18. The parents have waged a media campaign of lies and distortions.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:03 PM
14

cuz PATRIARCHY
/r/MensRights24/05/13 11:59 AM
3

You can enforce a law fairly or repeal it. There can be no other option. It damn sure better be retroactive to all the men that had their lives ruined for the same damn thing. If the law is not repealed, I hope she enjoys jail
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:27 AM
1

Jail is not prison. Jail is where you are taken based on the claim
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:22 AM
2

I get your point, I really do. The black community needs to "person up" as a whole. I wish he would ho to Spellman college and say the same thing. That doesn't take away from the idea that black males need to do better.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:16 AM
3

While true, we have to remember that he was speaking at moorehouse
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:11 AM
0

Agreed, the shaming had too stop.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:37 AM
3

He is speaking to Moorehouse grads, not inner city boys. I assure you have the demographic wrong
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:35 AM
5

That's not correct. The vast majority of father less homes hsppen because people that should not have kids do at an alarming rate
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:33 AM
5

On one hand, the man up and take responsibility for everything is sexist. On the other, as a black man, he had a point, we as a group have been complete failures when it comes to the black family. The black women aren't much better. College grad myself engaged to a college grad, this isn't a sexist thing, the state of the black family is a damned disgrace and I'm glad he is at least addressing it.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:29 AM
2

Don't buy the tickets, the free market will fix it
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:24 AM
0

My good sir, you haven't shown that going on a few dates makes anyone liable for child support. Your warped world view is a sad one and the situation you describe is a paranoid delusion.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:02 AM
-3

Literally not one of those has anything to do with the situation you described. Not one of them is even close to the situation you described. Please show the world a case of a man dating a women for a few months and being sued for child support. You are being willfully obtuse or a troll. When you make a ridiculous claim and someone demands proof, you should probably try to prove that claim. The facts of hose cases have zero to do with what you claimed
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:50 AM
-2

do me a favor, please cite one case where this happened. This doesnt happy to anyone, please site one legit article detailing something like this happen. You have still provided zero proof of this thing happening to anyone, anywhere, ever.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:41 AM
-2

please supply one shred pf proof that it is possible. pro tip: family law may be outright terrible but you pulled that right out of fantasy land
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:14 AM
-4

There is zero way that is the truth. Sorry, it just isnt.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:45 AM
5

OK,but in reality where rape shield laws arent going anywhere, should the accused be given the same benefit.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:31 PM
7

yes. if the accuser is hidden, the accused must be hidden.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:29 PM
-8

you realize almost everything you said is paranoid nonsense right?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:25 PM
7

Alternet is such complete garbage
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:20 PM
7

Nice guys are playing by fraudulent rules. They have been told that x, something attainable by anyone, leads to y, when the truth is q leads to y and everyone is not born with q. The greatest disservice a man can do to a young son in terms of dealing with the opposite sex is to continue his farce of a belief system.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:04 PM
12

You can't possibly be serious.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 10:24 AM
1

I don't have to accept your irresponsible behavior and you don't have to accept mime That is life. Being a slut regardless of gender is irresponsible and you will be judged, just like the smoker and the person stuffing their face with mountains of cheesecake
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:33 PM
26

Mandatory paternity tests
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:30 PM
2

And if this kid didnt have a great lawyer he very well may have gone to prison.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 11:54 AM
2

It is a shame that the only recourse for having someone wreck your future is to destroy them and their families future. As long as police fail to do their jobs and an accusation has the power it does, this needs to happen.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 04:27 PM
0

civil right are not what you think they are. The fact that anyone upvoted you is troubling.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:24 AM
9

There is almost nothing objectively known about this case and you are attacking the people that want due process. This is exactly what feminism looks like.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:02 PM
10

Poor editing is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:00 PM
2

This stuff needs to be mocked and satirized to hell and back
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:22 PM
1

so you have never been to college?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:08 AM
1

yeah i agree with this. Wouldn't feminists think taking obvious precautions was victim blaming though?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:29 PM
20

As a black guy I chuckle when a white upper class feminists lectures me about my privilege. The privilege wars have begun.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:57 PM
3

I don't know what happened and if there was a valid investigation, what exactly is the governments recourse?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:30 AM
7

this is what I have been saying, it is a troll.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:17 PM
3

That is a very real issue and one I support changing. What I do not support is outright making crap up by stating minorities and women get free stuff that white male vets do not. The first part, you may have been responding to someone else. Fixing the VA? I am on board, making up stuff to play oppression Olympics? OP can go make up crap elsewhere.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:47 PM
3

We do have an obligation, and we do. That thing you are fighting is a strawman. Being a vet does not give you your own set of facts. he IS lying about women and minorities getting benefits unavailable to white men to play oppression bingo. I understand we don't do a great job with returning vets but perhaps the economy being shitty and their previous job paying much, much more than the available civilian jobs has much more to do with that than a systemic bias against white men. The op is full of…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:33 PM
14

because it is a troll.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:27 PM
4

hah, ignore reality because it doesn't fit my ignorant word view that wimminz and blacks get everything right? He cant call the VA OR just look at the rest of that page and see he is full of crap. Of course that would not make hi a victim anymore. We don't need people that are liars or clearly stupid posting non Men's Rights issues in Men's Rights. This is some White Rights garbage devoid of any actual information.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:22 PM
1

As someone who understands those programs are open to all vets, your whining is pathetic and borderline entitlement bullshit. You are entitled to each of those programs and as a vet, you should know you could call the VA and get it. Being a vet, even a disabled one does not give you licence to be a douche bag. This is not a men's rights post, this is a whining ignorant one and you should feel ashamed.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:11 PM
4

On the basis of what exactly did you cone to that conclusion. Polls say differently and a President supporting gay marriage was elected in a landslide.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:05 PM
1

No not really. There is no legal reasoning outside of the absurd states right argument that the federal government should not be involved in marriage at all. That argument is silly because there us no chance in hell Congress would ever vote to strip married couples of the privileges of marriage. They are arguing in bad faith and realize they have lost.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:51 PM
8

You should have just old her it was over. I understand wanting to just end it, I hope you don't wind up having a false rape accusation leveled against you out of spite.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:16 PM
9

I have never denied the existence of privilege, just the idea that there was an all encompassing male privilege and that there was no female privilege. It rustles my jimmies to no end when a white middle to upper class feminists tells me the privilege I have over her.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:46 AM
2

Comments close, feminist doing a bang up job of defending their warped ideology once again.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:14 PM
-2

This will be appealed and overturned. The legal system cant handle the avalanche of shenanigans this would bring.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:00 AM
1

there would be riots
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter