TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vektor0 Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by Vektor0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's great info and all, but I don't see how it disproves the claim.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:00 PM
2

Your original point was essentially that Prostitutes are trafficked so it's wrong to hold them criminally liable....... Hence why I've signposted to an article from a leftwing source detailing how that's a fallacy. Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think the article ever even addresses that. If you could quote the portion you think is relevant, that would be helpful.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 12:11 PM
2

The article only helps evidence my point: But when all sex work is illegal, consensual, of-age sex workers are far more reluctant to report coercion, abusive pimps, and underage prostitutes for fear of being arrested themselves. This makes actual sex trafficking more difficult to discover. This is why the sale of sex is not illegal, only the purchase. How can a sex worker be afraid of being arrested if he/she isn't doing anything he/she could be arrested for?
/r/MensRights22/04/21 11:15 AM
8

To be clear, whether or not prostitution should be legal is an entirely separate discussion. The reasoning for criminalizing the purchase of sex rather than the sale obviously only applies if you already believe that prostitution should be illegal. I stated this before.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:51 AM
-7

Same reason a woman investing in the business should be criminalized, of course.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:46 AM
-9

If you're of the opinion that prostitution and/or forced prostitution should be illegal, yes.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:44 AM
-32

A lot of sex workers are being trafficked and have don't have a choice but to sell sex. It doesn't seem right to jail someone for doing something they were forced to do, does it? You're basically punishing someone for being a victim. That's not justice.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 12:01 AM
0

It's not just that. A lot of sex workers are being trafficked themselves and have don't have a choice but to sell sex. It doesn't seem right to jail someone for doing something they were forced to do, does it? You're basically punishing someone for being a victim. That's not justice.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 12:00 AM
4

she could tell DFCS that she knows of a male photographer with cp, and it would likely cost me everything. Only if they find CP. Worst case scenario, they get a warrant, confiscate your storage devices, find nothing, and that's the end of it. If you're really concerned they might recover something that's been deleted, destroy and trash the memory cards. And obviously, save the messages that prove she took the photos and was threatening to falsely accuse you. You're fine. She's just blowing smoke…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:16 AM
1

I think you should look up the definition of the word "alleged," because I don't think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:44 PM
1

There have been cases where video evidence is proven faulty or otherwise inadmissible. I specifically remember hearing about a case where a man was convicted based on video evidence, but that conviction was later overturned because it was somehow proven the guy in the video wasn't even him.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:25 PM
17

News articles always call a crime "alleged" until a court ruling is made. It's not a bias; it's to prevent libel lawsuits.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 07:29 PM
15

Reported by whom?
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:33 PM
18

The attack was three years ago, and she apparently just now admitted to the extended break. It's possible they didn't know about it back when she was awarded.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 06:55 PM
53

OP is lying. She was one of the first responders to the scene, and it was for her work as a first responder that she received an award. She just wasn't there when the attack occurred (and she apparently would have been, had she ended her break at the proper time). She also apparently didn't admit to her extended break until three years after the attack.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 06:50 PM
1

The part about female leads being invariably boring was referring specifically to instances where a female lead is shoehorned into a story simply to have a female character. He didn't say that all female leads are boring simply by virtue of being female.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:45 PM
3

The part about female leads being invariably boring was referring specifically to instances where a female lead is shoehorned into a story simply to have a female character. He didn't say that all female leads are boring simply by virtue of being female.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:45 PM
6

The goal of third-wave feminism is to replace gender equality with gynocentrism, wouldn't you agree? I wouldn't exactly equate gender equality with the whole of Western civilization, but I guess it could be argued that it is one of many Western values.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 05:42 PM
12

I didn't say anything about anyone trying to destroy the West. The rest of your comment is just varied repetitions of "haha omg that's stupid," so there's not really much else for me to respond to.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 04:23 PM
11

I didn't say that all leftists are third-wave feminists, or that all leftists believe in all left-wing ideologies. I simply said it's a left-wing ideology, which is true. Not everyone on the right believes in all right-wing ideologies either. "Marxism," at its essence, perceives the world through the context of class struggle--an oppressor class and an oppressed class. If we add "cultural" in front of it, it simply means that we're not referring to economic classes, but cultural classes. The bel…
/r/MensRights12/10/20 04:05 PM
10

Third-wave feminism is a left-wing ideology. It's predicated on the idea that women are institutionally oppressed (patriarchy), which is a form of cultural Marxism. You won't find any right-wing feminists who believe the same things radical left-wing feminists do. Right-wing support for feminism stopped at second-wave feminism.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 03:35 PM
9

Conservative support for feminism is stopped at second-wave feminism and did not continue to third-wave feminism. The most that conservative feminists will go is that they believe they have the same right to work as men do and deserver to be treated as equals to men. They won't go so far as to believe in the patriarchy, or that all men are rapists, etc.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 03:32 PM
156

The teen was diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), which is correlated with elevated levels of testosterone I'm going to guess whoever decided on this treatment thought, "the issue is that he has too much of the masculine hormone, so we need to balance that out with the feminine hormone." A lot of people think that high testosterone causes aggression and irritability, but that's not true. The body converts testosterone into estrogen, and then the elevated estrogen causes the aggres…
/r/MensRights07/10/20 02:19 PM
6

Selfish and malicious abuse of rules like that is sociopathic, which is crazy. Most people have an amount of empathy that prevents them from behaving that way.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 02:55 PM
59

The idea is that men hold more positions of power because of historical oppression of women, and so we need to discriminate against men for a time to allow women to take more positions of power. It's like an hourglass that's spent more time tilted in one direction than the other. If you want an equal amount of sand on both sides, you need to tilt the hourglass the other direction to make sand move from the fuller side to the emptier side. The problem with this idea is that the goal isn't defined…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:07 AM
5

I think everyone sees your point, they just don't think it's relevant to the comment you replied to or this post.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 11:21 PM
12

If you read the post, it's clear she's mentally ill. It's not just one or even a few "jokes that went too far"; it's a pattern of complete disregard for peoples' safety and well-being, putting them in harmful or dangerous situations for amusement. That's not immaturity; that's a mental disorder.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 10:32 AM
259

I don't get it. Pretty much every commenter is rightfully pointing out that the chick is sadistic, narcissistic, sociopathic, dangerous, and likely to kill someone soon. But none of that matters because the term "domestic violence" isn't used? Usually, people use DV to refer to hitting and throwing. The OP didn't mention that occurring, so of course people are focusing on terms that more accurately label her behavior as the OP described it. This wouldn't be any less true if the genders were reve…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 09:12 AM
1

Is there a need to promote accountability for rapists? How many people think that rapists shouldn't be punished?
/r/MensRights16/09/20 11:36 PM
12

All those rapists be like, "I didn't know it was wrong to rape people 🤷‍♂️" /s
/r/MensRights16/09/20 11:34 PM
3

Yes, this has been posted to several other subs in the last week, and everyone agrees that this is awful. It is a popular opinion. This sub is better off focusing on unpopular opinions than circle-jerking about non-issues.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 03:52 AM
8

Is there a reason you provided a billion links to the same story?
/r/MensRights12/09/20 09:54 PM
-1

That's not tone policing. Tone policing is when you suggest an argument is invalid because of its tone. He's not saying your argument is invalid; he's saying it's unpersuasive. In other words, what good is it to have the most correct, logical, and moral positions in the room if you can't convince anyone of it? If you could present your argument in a more persuasive way without compromising it, why wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights12/09/20 01:26 AM
-1

The subreddit is called "unpopular opinions," not "popular opinions."
/r/MensRights09/09/20 11:42 PM
-1

It's not controversial at all. It's a very popular opinion.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 11:41 PM
3

The only reason police sent adult nudes is because sending underage nudes is, obviously, illegal. And some women can look very young for their age--my wife, for example, was often mistaken for a high school student until her mid-20s. I often hear about underage women lying about being adults, but I've never heard of adult women lying about being underage. It seems most reasonable to me that the men the police arrested actually did believe that the girls were actually underage. I don't really hav…
/r/MensRights07/09/20 10:22 AM
-1

Some women look really young for their age. My wife looked like a high school student until her mid-20s.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 10:18 AM
1

There is a moral difference between taking something away from someone (like the human right to live) and not providing something for someone (like financial support). It is the same as the difference between murdering a homeless man and not giving him any change today.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 01:56 PM
0

To be fair, there is no justification of abortion that is based in scientific fact. Any justification is arbitrary and subjective.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 01:30 PM
1

Why not just kill all the kids currently in adoption and foster care? Their lives suck anyway, right? Or do you think it should be up to each individual to decide for himself if he wants to continue living?
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:59 PM
2

Many of the arbitrary conditions for humanity people name--heartbeat, sentience, etc.--develop within the first month, maybe two, of gestation. Depending on your arbitrary condition, the human has probably already developed it before the woman even realizes she's pregnant. It's totally possible we're looking at this thing all wrong in the first place. We currently view the stages of human development as starting at baby, then growing into a toddler, then a child, then an adolescent, etc. But wha…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 12:51 PM
7

But you pay for it, so it's not free. Your taxes are your premiums.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 12:57 PM
1

See recent repost Determine newer post Downvote
/r/MensRights10/08/20 05:10 PM
-5

"Feminism" doesn't mention men, but you'd say it's a man-hating movement, wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights09/08/20 02:49 PM
3

/r/NobodyAsked
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:17 PM
1

It got deleted because it's been posted and reposted ad nauseum.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 04:21 AM
1

That's actually not the same comic tho.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:22 AM
6

Current society norms favor a certain ideal of man (the known hyper masculine, loud, aggressive, assertive and all that fluff) This isn't true at all. Society views those kinds of men as difficult and immature. Society favors men who are calm, rational, and detached. They see those kinds of men as cool, mature, and desirable. Whether the situation is a job interview, a date, or a social gathering, the latter type will always get preferential treatment over the former.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:16 AM
1

I found the article. It is short, rife with spelling mistakes and improper grammar, poorly-written, and poorly-structured. The person who wrote it clearly doesn't have English as their primary language, and the website itself clearly values quantity over quality. Therefore, I wouldn't read too much into the nuances of its wording. That said, I think the author's purpose wasn't to take attention away from this cancer affecting men, but rather to encourage women to educate themselves about it so t…
/r/MensRights01/08/20 01:01 AM
3

Article link: http://web.archive.org/web/20200729055457/www.wsj.com/articles/lonely-girls-how-the-pandemic-has-deepened-the-isolation-of-adolescents-11595937600 I'm guessing the reason they're focusing on girls is because the article is about how the pandemic is affecting people, and girls are more likely to say they feel more lonely now. But when I look at that graph, I see that boys are more likely to feel just as lonely as before. How sad is it that the country is locked down, people are avoi…
/r/MensRights29/07/20 11:58 PM
-1

This is already the case. You can legally abdicate your rights as a father, and then you won't have any legal ties to the child.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 10:44 PM
3

It's removed because it gets posted there like weekly. No need for the same posts over and over again.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 10:43 PM
-1

The word "should" wasn't used in the original tweet though. That word drastically changes the meaning. If I said "high cut tops < low cut tops," no one but the most radical of feminists would bat an eye.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 09:59 PM
-1

TBH, I really don't see the difference between "x < y" and "I prefer y." The wording does not change the meaning much, if at all.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 09:54 PM
12

"I like it when women wear low-cut tops" I don't think anyone but the most radical of feminists would cancel anyone for that statement.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:46 PM
49

She may have only been making a statement about what type of clothing she finds attractive. That's not really the same thing as saying you're "not allowed" to wear something. You're certainly allowed to dress however you want for the most part, but other people are also certainly allowed to rate your appearance based on the way you appear.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:43 PM
1

I think that's just a rumor.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:10 PM
19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:47 PM
1

Well, that makes OP's title purposefully misleading. :/ I hate fake news.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 02:34 PM
11

The graphic is wrong because it's too general. It describes various emotional abuses, but not all emotional abuses are gaslighting. Gaslighting is a very specific type of emotional abuse. It's when the abuser does totally innocuous things, like turning off lights, only to deny it later for the sole purpose of getting their victim to doubt their sanity and perception of reality. Just because your emotional abuse has given you low self-esteem doesn't mean you've been gaslit.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 02:09 PM
1

"Guys, I made a comment that is explicitly against a sub's rules and a mod removed it, wtf"
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:46 PM
1

Who cares? It's not like that sub is worth posting in anyways.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:45 PM
6

Feminists have been writing about the gender division of labour Given the spelling, I'm going to guess it's UK.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 02:07 PM
9

Yeah, but throwing a rock doesn't do that.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 06:53 PM
28

Are you perpetuating the stereotype that gay men are promiscuous?! /s
/r/MensRights07/12/19 02:26 AM
2

I am saddened that this sub has become less about male rights and more about incel problems and MGTOW. The community overall acts so small-minded and scornful. I would unsub, but this place does have some good posts sometimes. I have a feeling that won't last much longer.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 02:57 PM
1

It was removed within minutes because the mods knew it was a troll.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:12 AM
2

Every moron who upvoted this post should be ashamed of themselves (as well as OP for posting the screenshot, if he didn't author the troll himself). This is as clear a troll as it could possibly be.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:10 AM
5

The response was by the OP. Every other comment in the thread was calling it rape. No one except the fake account was defending it.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:03 AM
6

No they don't. Crappy people's minds are rarely changed by a clever and inflammatory comeback. It's fun to think about, but had he actually done it, it just would have given him another crying baby to worry about.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 10:13 AM
1

I don't think so. Burglaries aren't life-ruining--unless an additional, worse crime, like rape or murder, was also committed.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:09 PM
1

You could say the same about identity theft, libel and defamation, physical and emotional abuse, and a myriad of other wrongdoings. You could say "other people must be warned about this person" regarding all kinds of different crimes.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 01:37 PM
1

Wouldn't that be the same for any crime? What makes false accusations need its own registry, but not every other crime?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:06 PM
-4

So what's the point of putting them on the sex offender registry?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:48 PM
4

Obviously, they would have to prove that she did lie. Lack of evidence of a crime isn't proof that the accusation was false.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:06 PM
-9

I wish the mods would crack down on these kinds of posts. Two years ago, this sub was purely about men's rights and issues; now, it's mostly... not. OP's opinion is born out of anger; it's not a serious, rational attempt to solve a problem.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:56 PM
-3

Why stop at false accusations though? Why not have a public website for every crime anyone has ever committed?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:52 PM
4

Increasing the severity of a crime's punishment doesn't make it less likely that someone will commit that crime. What affects likelihood of committing a crime is likelihood of getting caught. We already have laws against providing false information to police. You start enforcing that, you deter false accusations.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:43 PM
2

Increasing the severity of a crime's punishment doesn't make it less likely that someone will commit that crime. What affects likelihood of committing a crime is likelihood of getting caught. We already have laws against providing false information to police. You start enforcing that, you deter false accusations.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:43 PM
13

That's an easy way to make sure no one ever confesses to making a false accusation.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 12:06 PM
2

People in the adultery subreddit talk about sexual dissatisfaction with marriage partners. Who knew?! None of this says anything about promiscuous women in general, nor is this directly related to a man's rights.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 12:20 PM
41

I think there's a difference between what one knows is the rational, correct answer and how one perceives a situation unfolding in front of them. Like, we know that it's rational to sacrifice a few so that many will live. But when faced with the Trolley Problem, suddenly, it doesn't seem so cut-and-dry.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:20 AM
32

What's more, teacher jobs usually pay a set amount based on years of experience, and the salary schedule is usually posted on the school district's website. 0 wage gap.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:07 AM
67

Yes. So that means OP actually got suspended for something else. The question is whether or not that something else actually has merit or is just a cover for ideological censorship.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:04 AM
9

I don't like that analogy because it seems like it'd be used to support unequal treatment, not oppose.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 05:02 PM
1

You misread the article. He's ordered to pay $104,000 per year when, in the 10 years prior to the judgment, he made at most $140,000 and averaged $90,000. Judgment is still insane and stupid.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:21 AM
-1

People don't change, but they can grow and mature.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:34 PM
43

Okay, but what statistics are used to back up the use of the term "most"?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:58 PM
2

This is such a dumb argument, particularly because it feeds into the narrative that men hold all the positions of power and in doing so hold women back.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:49 PM
13

"She has made my life difficult over contact with our son, and I have suffered stress resulting me taking medication and losing weight. ... "I don't want her to go to prison — I want her to be a good mother to our son ... That's not going to happen. I had an abusive mom, and she treated all of us kids worse than she treated my dad. If this poor guy is being threatened and assaulted with knives, baseball bats, and crowbars, imagine what the kid, who is smaller, weaker, dependent on her, and under…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:08 PM
1

You are bringing all kinds of what-ifs to the table when I am just making a general statement. Obviously, the more specifics you give, the more different a just outcome might look. Your overall point you seem to have been making is that if you don't have full custody of a child, you should have no responsibility for it at all. I disagree with that.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 04:09 PM
1

So what happens when the mother and father don't want to live together? Is the kid only going to have to live with the time + money of the one custodial parent rather than two? What about in cases of partial custody? Wouldn't that entail partial financial responsibility? Laws do state that you have a responsibility to your kid. They also give ways to abdicate that responisibility; one method is through adoption, another method is through the termination of parental rights. If you do terminate yo…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:36 PM
1

It is not good parenting to have carelessly impregnated several different women so that your time with each child is more limited. It is not good parenting to help create a child and then refuse to care or provide for it while you are capable of doing so. The alternative to the government enforcing child support is that a person (male or female) who doesn't want a kid can simply abandon it. Laws state that both the mother and the father have legal responsibilities for the kid. If you want to arg…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:41 PM
1

Not an income requirement per se, but a requirement to do what it takes to provide. If you can provide for your kid without working, great. If you can't, you gotta work.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 01:39 PM
-2

You don't think part of being a parent is paying for your kid's stuff?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 11:24 AM
17

Bro never hear about condoms? I wanna feel bad, but if you're gonna get four separate women pregnant, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 01:34 AM
6

the company does not tolerate discrimination of any kind. Our board and executive leadership team believe diverse and inclusive teams are good for business and consistent with our mission ... Linking compensation to these aspirations is an important demonstration of executive commitment to something we believe strongly in. How do these people not see that any attempt to artificially change the racial or gender makeup of a group is, by definition, discrimination? If you truly think that diversity…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:08 AM
1

Just because something is usually done in a certain way doesn't mean that that's the only right or correct way to do it. It just means it's the way it's usually done. I think you're reading too much into this.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:41 PM
7

Men and women can both be good parents, but the way they are good parents are often more different. For example, men tend to play with their kids physically more than women (e.g. play wrestling and spinning around). We use the terms "masculine" and "feminine" to describe these differences between men and women. The video shows some examples of ways that men are good parents in ways that are unique to men. Ergo, it is accurate to say it is positive and healthy masculinity.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 02:49 PM
0

I disagree that others having low standards means we should have low standards too. We should have high standards for ourselves regardless of what anyone else is doing. I also disagree that it is okay to lie (which includes being intentionally misleading) as long as you think nothing bad will happen.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:27 PM
9

That is a retarded mindset. Reverse the genders and no one is doubting female victims of...anything But they should. There should be a healthy amount of skepticism regardless of gender. We gotta practice what we preach, meaning if we think it's okay to call out a woman for possibly making something up, it's okay to do the same to a man. Sure, call out double-standards when you see them. But we need to make sure we adhere to the same standards we wish others to abide by. why does the truthfulness…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:02 PM
17

Women's haircuts don't generally involve buzzers, and men's often do. Buzzers make the cut go a lot more quickly than scissors all the way around. Women's styles are often a lot more complicated and layered. Don't need to consult a stylist; just as a woman how much time she usually spends at a salon and compare that to how much time you spend. I'm usually in and out in 20 minutes or less. It's not uncommon for my wife to spend an hour or more.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:27 AM
2

Exactly how much more did I need to get to know her? Many of us have emotional junk that's been stuffed away in our mental attic and repressed. There's no way to avoid that when it comes out. But I also think it's important to keep in mind that the person you (not "you" personally, "you" in general) married is probably still there, just buried under the emotional stress. I think it's interesting that your wife didn't start getting her act together until you threatened to end the marriage. It's l…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:54 PM
3

You'll burn yourself out pretty quickly if you're constantly working overtime without any time off. Not good regardless of marital status. Use some of your PTO. It will be okay.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:38 PM
8

My mom and stepmom were both awful wives to my dad. They insulted and emotionally manipulated him, and they never admitted fault or any sort of wrongness ever. I see that commonly in wives: they often treat their husbands with so much disrespect, yet it seems like everyone thinks it's socially acceptable. That's why my wife feels like a unicorn to me. She apologizes for offending me or treating me poorly, and she cares when I am upset. But that's not always her first reaction; her first reaction…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:36 PM
1

If there are move cases of prove false rape allegations than their are actual convictions, until anyone comes up with a difinitive number of the unknown cases who either got away with it or who was telling lies about rape, the law of average and probability its what is used to look at the whole. This is the same argument feminists use to "prove" that a wage gap exists: dubious "statistics" backed by a flimsy argument that doesn't stand up to scrutiny, but they choose to believe it anyway because…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:14 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez10Uwsl0lk Bearing was not attempting to prove that most rape claims are false. He was attempting to discredit the claim that true rape accusations were more "statistically significant" than false ones. He didn't make the claim that there are universally more false accusations than assaults because, as he is smart enough to know, we don't have enough information. Moreover, the 7% of false rape accusations was an estimation and the 3% of true accusations was based…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:10 PM
1

come from a box that has been well mixed. It wouod be impossible for you to only pock out the corner pieces. Impossible for me to do it, sure, but possible that random chance may give you more top-right corner pieces than other pieces. Point is that any extrapolation you make using only 10% of the information is much more likely to be wrong than right because there are more possible wrong answers than possible right answers. the same ratio should be applied throughout unless specific evidence ca…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 06:02 PM
1

I can estimate whatever I want buddy. Just like the feminist it's say Sure. But if your ideology follows the same logic and reasoning as theirs, then it will suck just as much. 3% of rape cases finish in conviction and 7% are proven to be false allegations. Assuming that's true: That's a 2:1 ratio of provably false to provably true. Not 9:1. 90% of cases are unknown. How can you make a statement with any sort of confidence when we only have 10% of the relevant information? Say I give you 100 pie…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:34 PM
3

I'm sure many third-wave feminists' views of rape culture are exaggerated due to confirmation bias, but it goes both ways. Don't exaggerate counter-claims unless you have evidence to back it up.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:56 PM
6

Yeah, it's hard for me to believe that too. I'm pretty sure current income is taken into account when discussing alimony or child support payments. She would have had to have quit her job or something.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:59 PM
0

Yes, adding and removing information are opposites but they can be used for the same thing. Which is exactly what I said before: different means, same ends. You stated that presenting the public with true, objectively information to influence public opinion can be propaganda I did not. Propaganda is subjective, so any information portrayed objectively cannot be propaganda. Whether or not a particular piece of data or information is true, and whether that information is presented objectively or s…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:09 PM
1

no
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:23 PM
1

no u – /u/serious_sarcasm, probably
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:13 PM
0

I didn't say you said that either. It's okay though. A guy whose greatest hits are "nuh uh" and "it didn't include Breitbart" will never be as good of a troll as Donald Trump. :P
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:37 PM
1

Presenting fabricated information to the public and concealing certain facts to intentionally manipulate public opinion is essentially the same Adding information and removing information are, by definition, opposites. And opposites cannot be the same. Can I ask what is so wrong with differentiating between the two? Influencing public opinion with true, objective information is not the same as using skewed information to deceptively influence public opinion. Sure, but I don't think anyone ever m…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:17 PM
1

First time Trump used the term "fake news" was on January 11, bro. A whole two months after that list I referenced was first published. I know you're trying to seem like you know about current events, but responding with stuff like "No. No, it was not" doesn't really help your credibility.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:03 AM
1

Trump then adopted it to refer to any and all media which he disagrees with (including opinion pieces that aren't even news). Was what I was responding to. It was the mainstream media, not Trump, who were the first to start referring to any and all media they disagree with, including opinion pieces that aren't even news, as "fake news."
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:59 AM
1

Nor does it include Media Matters or Jim Acosta. But going into such things would be missing the point.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:21 AM
1

The picture clearly falsifies information Nothing is false in the photo. You look at the photo on the left: a man really did point a gun at another man's head. You look at the photo on the right: a man really did give another man water. That really happened. Neither picture depicts something that did not happen. Here is an example of a falsified photo: https://i.redd.it/i1f0aw8g6ifz.jpg False information was added to the photo. It's not just misleading; it's flat-out false. Those two people did …
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:14 AM
2

Kinda. Trump wasn't the first to misappropriate the term. A college professor compiled a list of "fake news" websites, which not only included actual fake news websites, but also sites that simply tend to sensationalize. These sites were basically put into three categories: actual fake news, over-sensationalized (to the point of being propaganda) news, and simply having misleading headlines. There were some smaller news sites that appeared on the list only because of bias or sensationalized head…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:39 AM
2

That's not true. You can quote someone out-of-context, frame events, leave out important information, etc., in order to paint a narrative (propagandize). You can use the same true information to influence opinion one way or another just by manipulating that information. What makes propaganda propaganda isn't its truth or falsity, but its intent to influence opinion. Example: https://i.imgur.com/fXt5qci.jpg
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:12 AM
1

"Logical" is still just as correct as "valid." All it means is that the conclusion is consistent with the premises. The premises being wrong doesn't make the conclusion illogical; it makes it false. For example, if x+y=4, and if we think x=2, then we can logically conclude that y=2. But if actually x=1, that doesn't make the previous conclusion illogical; it just makes it false.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:48 PM
5

This is the way it is right now. Everyone they don't like is an alt-right white supremacist, even if their views having nothing to do with that. It's been happening to Trump supporters for two years now.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:43 PM
11

It's been this way for over a year now. "We want to curtail illegal immigration, defeat ISIS, and revitalize our economy." "NO YOU WANT TO LYNCH BLACKS AND KILL GAYS AND OPPRESS WOMEN AND MAKE PEOPLE POOR" "... What?"
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:40 PM
7

Saying that it is Trump supporters' faults that accusations of white supremacy are rampant is like saying it's MensRights' fault that accusations of sexism are rampant.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter