TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vman2 Archive

View 2 posts and 175 comments by Vman2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
40

Activism/SupportVman2/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:59 PM
33

DiscriminationVman2/r/MensRights08/01/19 01:10 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You need to clarify. You need to talk about systematic disadvantages. As for systematic disadvantages, I fail to see a single one that women have in western countries.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:20 AM
5

100%. I haven't been to the movies for ages and it's extremely hard to find any movie on Netflix worth watching. Almost all are pushing a feminist agenda. In general a female lead makes the movie not credible and not entertaining. Probably works for a romcom but we're not into those. My wife just goes to bed early because there's nothing to watch. I try to find something but often give up myself.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:05 AM
1

Given her demonstrated skills I'm pleased she is selecting the bear. She's going to do her part to improve the gene pool. Good for her.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 07:42 AM
3

What we ought to do is call out feminists and feminism for its pernicious and hypocritical nature. The rest of your comment is the good ole no true Scotsman fallacy. Apparently all the feminists who say, write or advocate anything are somehow not real feminists. The real feminists are apparently slient and invisible. Yeah sure. Heard that one for 30 years now.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 02:11 AM
4

Being a feminist means advocating equal or better OUTCOMES in selected areas of society for women and often special privileges in other areas of society. All while claiming victim status often by using mental gymnastics. Often this all comes down to ignoring the humanity of men. Technically that might not be the definition of hate but if you think about this in reality it is something worse.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:38 AM
1

Not really. Depending what kind of bear and what weapons the man can make, he actually has a chance with the bear. It can't really be a Polar Bear because that would require the island to be ice bound and the extreme cold would kill him before the bear so let's forget Polar Bears. Grizzly or Brown Bear would be the greatest risk. Although a brown bear isn't going to run up and eat you, all bets are off once you go to sleep. However the man could build a moat and spikes and fire and get some leve…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:49 PM
1

To me the allegation incel is only a slur to avoid addressing real issues in society by somehow labelling a subset of males. By some mental gymnastics, that requires a total lqck of empathy, this label therefore is supposed to mean everyone else should join in to cancel and ostrichise the target of the slur. In this way the group can demonstrate that they are part of the caring left and that they uphold equality for all. All without the slightest hint of irony or self awareness of their hypocris…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:10 AM
5

Keep in mind the tax gap. Men pay taxes into the system through their lives. Women take benefits out from the system through their lives. When you look at the whole government system in a developed country, it is a wealth transfer from men to women. Look it up if you don't believe me. I addition to that, men take more risks and own more businesses and shares, and so the majority of business taxes is also a transfer of wealth from men to women. As the population reduces, not only will the GDP red…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:44 AM
1

What nut case would do that? Don't walk. Run. Don't be a serf your whole life.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:20 PM
2

They're not really your friends if they want you to be a surf for some 304. Never date single mothers. There's absolutely no advantage for you. Only down sides. Only possible exception would be a widow.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:14 PM
5

F em. Can't manipulate you if you left them behind and don't communicate with them.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:10 PM
21

I just can't comprehend how a teacher could be so sexist and racist towards children they are supposed to be teaching and yet retain their job. Or be allowed to teach ever again. It boggles the mind. There is no way this would be tolerated towards girls but since it is directed at boys then it is just fine. Which the boys will now become well aware of. In fact watch the media turn this about race and completely gloss over the sexism aspect.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:16 AM
61

Pandemic levels in Australia but it goes against the narrative to talk about the causes so nothing improves. It's just some males dying. Nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 11:12 AM
3

Given the lack of basic empathy your mother had for her own son I'd cast serious doubts that your father raped her at all. He may not have been a nice person but given the way your mother behaved I would not trust her opinion on anyone.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 08:08 AM
1

Just wanted to point out the question is poorly phrased. 80% of women are not feminists. Women don't support women's sport. Probably most feminists don't actually do anything to support women's sport except talk about it either. However the core fact is that the good majority of both men and women are not interested in women's sport. Since feminists are a small minority and likely have little disposal income they are pretty much irrelevant to professional sport.
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 09:54 PM
29

At least she's honest. The vast majority of feminists try to deny it when all available evidence displays their misandry. I actually have more respect for the openly hateful.
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 09:37 PM
1

And you will have to fight against feminists for every one of those goals.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 09:52 PM
1

I have heard this "No true Scottsman" fallacy from feminists for over 20 years. It is not just that feminists are anti-men. It is that contemporary feminism is hypocritical from it's very core fundamentals. You are doing the very thing that you accuse anti-feminists of doing. You are saying that anti-feminists are really anti-misandrists and that no true feminists is a misandrist. There are 2 flaws with this. First, when someone points out the hypocrisy of feminism you are rephrasing that as cri…
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 09:50 PM
1

Rape is worse than a false accusation Is this the oppression Olympics? Apart from in France, the principle in all western culture is 'innocent until proven guilty'. Creating more victims and ruining their lives then justifying it because "death is worse" or "executing their children would be worse" or "genocide is worse" is not a sound argument at all. Your sense of equality sure disappeared quickly once this topic came up.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 09:25 PM
2

I've lost count of the number of cases where a man have been imprisoned for a false allegation by a woman. This absolutely ruined their life. You don't just 'get over' something like that.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 09:21 PM
1

As for false accusations ruin lives. False allegations against men in divorce is the norm. It is a tactic used by women for the express purpose of ruining the man's life and under mining or destroying the children's relationship with their father. Most of the time it works as intended. This is the same across almost the whole western world. And this is done in a systemic way. In any case, it seems your commitment to equality didn't last 10 minutes. In a sexual assault allegation it is usually he…
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 09:19 PM
1

Yes, but society has created a culture that promotes women to take certain jobs that don’t directly affect the order of society. This is a false assumption. If you look at the most equal and rich economies where people are most free to do what occupation they like (rather than just to get by). Then you see that there is in fact greater sexual polarization. Women go caring roles and men to STEM. So it is not "society". It is preference which is deep seated by the differences in gender. Which is p…
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 06:25 AM
1

Feminism at its best is about equal OUTCOMES for WOMEN in SELECTED areas of society. Often disadvantaging males in other areas of society. Egalitarianism is about equal OPPORTUNITIES for ALL people in ALL areas of society. In theory feminism is deceptive and dishonest. In practice feminism is a most pernicious ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/21 05:27 AM
2

About 3 people were made scape goats and had "disciplinary action". They were not named and we know that "disciplinary action" translates into 'nothing happened'. At the very most they got called into a meeting where they talk about how they were really doing the right thing but it will not look good so let's make up a press release. Imagine what would happen if the sexes were reversed.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 02:38 AM
1

As a Queenslander I now have zero trust in any female police officer. How could I?
/r/MensRights13/05/21 02:22 AM
2

I am not sure but what seems to happen is that 1. this is illegal. So the organisations goes to the Human Rights Council and says they want to directly contradict the law based on gender. The Human Rights Council, says it is men so its open season guys. So then the organisation is already set to have a good case if it ever got to court.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 02:20 AM
1

rnm The claim is that it was not a declared quota. It was just an unwritten rule some feminists implemented secretly. In reality no doubt it was a verbal directive from the female commissioner and when they got caught she threw a few minions under the bus.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 02:16 AM
2

You are free. Shut her out of your life 100% and avoid the same mistake at the next inevitable Gold digger trying to entrap a young doctor. You could tell folk she cheated so you ended it but honestly who cares what that train wreck is telling people. Shut her out and enjoy your freedom. Cheap lesson I'd say.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 10:52 AM
3

Andrew O'Keefe was the founding chairman of White Ribbon. Pushing the very ideology of man = violent perpetrator and woman = victim. He took every opportunity to shutdown and ridicule any attempt to raise or discuss mens issues or that men could be the victims of domestic violence. Now he wants the court and the public to believe that he was the victim and the female was the "aggressor" in his own domestic violence case. He is the poster child of a male feminist. In Australia, we wait with inter…
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 03:53 AM
1

re You misunderstood what I wrote. You replied with " That's not true, ..." then proceeded to agree with everything I said. We are in agreement. Perhaps you didn't intend to reply to my post.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 03:28 AM
2

So hang on. Let me try to follow this logic. It's pedophilic to disparage saggy boobs? It's pedophilic to not like body hair on women? It's pedophilic to be attracted to women younger than the man? etc. Let me guess, in the next post Kiara is claiming that they don't hate men.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 02:58 AM
3

Saves having to think about the issues. Actually saves having to think.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/21 02:07 AM
1

I disagree. Since about the 70s and certainly by the 80s feminism has been precisely as you described. What has changed is that more and more people are pointing out the hypocrisy of feminism. More importantly in very recent times people are less and less inclined to give feminism a free pass. In summary, it is not that feminism has become more hypocritical and controlling. It is that people are less tolerant and submissive to the feminist ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/21 11:21 AM
4

In a desperate search to justify the ▪︎Patriarchy▪︎ theory feminist clasp at any straw. They are utterly unprepared for anyone to question how they reached their conclusions. Again.
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/21 10:42 AM
1

With those decision making skills what could possibly go wrong for that child?
/r/MGTOW17/12/20 12:12 PM
6

That would be extremely confusing because there are extremely few people more sexist than a feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/20 11:44 AM
1

For once I disagree with him and I would have liked to try and change his mind. Radical feminism IS true feminism. They are one and the same. There is no definition to distinguish between radical feminism and "true" feminism. It's all feminism. Furthermore, every individual feminist believes her take on feminism is "true" feminism. In essence his premise is incorrect. Also antifeminists and non feminists are not more "true" feminist than feminists. That is self evidently false. Antifeminists and…
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 12:50 PM
2

Feminism is at best about equality of OUTCOMES for women in SELECTED areas of society. Often while maintaining or deepening disadvantages for men in other areas. Egalitarianism is about equal OPPORTUNITIES for ALL people in ALL areas of society. Big difference. Once you understand this you can point out hundreds examples of the hypocrisy of feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 12:44 PM
2

Feminazi just means radical feminist. However it's a false distinction. There is no majic line between feminism or radical feminism. It's the same ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 12:39 PM
3

25 million is not enough. He should be awarded ten times that amount in punitive damages plus four times his total costs. Plus an extra $10 million for doing a public service. Columbia University should be sued into rubble. The team of 8 lawyers that Columbia University have hired to fight this should also be fined for taking a case without any merit. Plus the woman should be named and sued into a life of poverty.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:38 AM
2

So "Radical" explains that she hates men and thinks masculinity is so toxic that she is actually a feminist. Yet in her own words: " but I’m also really into dick. " Not only that but again in her own words: " I’m really repelled by heterosexuality politically and personally " And she asks; "Who do I date?" So thinking this through, at first I thought the only person she could date would be herself. Then I realised she would find herself insufferable. So thinking about it further, the only perso…
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/20 01:55 AM
2

As an anti-feminist I have no real interest in fixing or improving feminism. Having studied feminism, I can confidently say that it is fundamentally flawed from it's basic paradigm. It's fundamental view of the world is based on fallacies. Attempting to improve feminism would simply divert attention away from the fact that it is fundamentally flawed and absolutely riddled with hypocrisy as a result. It would just be counter productive. The real reason we offend feminists is that we start to ques…
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/20 01:28 AM
2

Just looking at the original - you couldn't make this stuff up. I mean if I wanted to show the world I was a hypocrite I still couldn't come up with stuff half as good as feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/20 12:48 AM
1

I have ignored her messages Hell yeah, I've never be alone with her even for a minute.
/r/MGTOW05/02/20 12:20 AM
2

I think you should save this and give it to the guy in the inevitable break up. That said, it would only be to warn him of the true nature of what he got into. I don't know what country you are in, but I doubt this will be as much help to him in the family court as you might think. It does show she is calculating but that fact in itself, will probably be used against him in any custody dispute. The father is screwed.
/r/MGTOW05/02/20 12:15 AM
3

t dudes in stories for Yes but I think this ignores how powerful the cultural impregnation into men over a certain age was. It probably doesn't apply to younger generations but somewhere around Gen X and over, most boys and men were just too deeply pre-programmed to change their life aspirations. Many probably know in the back of their mind they should make other choices but struggle to break out of their conditioning.
/r/MGTOW04/02/20 11:47 PM
3

ment, a prominent left communist That "rule" should have been abandoned long before we reached a population of one billion. Which was about 1804.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/20 11:07 PM
1

not true. Most men would pay it but they would do their best to make it conditional on being an active parent in the child's life. Although we aren't making that a condition in this thread that is what most men would want.
/r/MGTOW03/06/19 08:30 AM
1

I think the answer is to wind back daddy government. Education and Heath care should be free for all children but that is for all children. If you don't want a hard life don't be a single mother. It's not like pregnancy is some kind of unavoidable accident that it was in 1930. It's now definitely a lifestyle choice. If you chose a shitty situation to have children in then it's on you, not the tax payer. So no, I don't agree that child support should be replaced by big daddy government. In fact c…
/r/MGTOW03/06/19 08:21 AM
1

Yes that would be a standard caveat. Just like women can't have an abortion once they are xx weeks pregnant.
/r/MGTOW03/06/19 06:58 AM
1

That's great. I couldn't read the white on grey part but I'm impressed that some people are trying to get some facts put on this topic.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:56 AM
1

These roles most likely evolved millions of years before the first homo species. All the points listed would have been a feedback loop that entrenched the roles. Disposable and physically superior males with spacial awareness taking the most risks. Females relatively protected and comfortable to raise the youngest children. Older children being schooled by older males. All of this would have evolved as the most successful society even before homo erectus. The sexual dimorphication is certainly a…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:59 AM
1

In Australia she would walk free.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:14 AM
6

I think that what you read was her defence lawyer trying the weak argument that after she shot him in the leg she then made a "warning shot" which was supposed to just miss him but in fact hit him in the head. It's not explained why a "warning shot" would even be on the agenda after she just came storming back with a gun and shot him in the leg already. Sadly this claim was enough for the prosecution to downgrade the charge in order to secure a conviction. That is perhaps where the pussy pass co…
/r/PussyPass28/04/19 10:11 AM
17

No true. They had an argument in the shed. She flew into a rage and knocked over a table and beer etc. Then she went back to the house. Got a gun and came back and shot him in the leg. Then she shot him in the head. Accident my backside.
/r/PussyPass28/04/19 09:47 AM
1

Tumblr who?
/r/PussyPass21/04/19 09:05 AM
2

I'm not sure it's even relevant. The issue is Mens rights. You only need to be an elgalitarian for that. A real elgalitarian of opportunity.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:18 AM
2

Not far enough. In those cases where it can be proven that a allegation was made when known to be false then that person should do a min 15 years in jail with min 8 years before being considered for parole.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:54 AM
3

It's not a good thing anyway. They have no plan to fix anything because they are in complete denial of the actual risk factors and want to spend it on their hypothetical risk factors. Which have no basis.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:31 AM
5

He doesn't make charges. The public prosecutor makes charges on behalf of the government. She was found guilty of the charges. The court has zero requirement to follow the victims wishes and there is no way a man would have got away with it like she did.
/r/PussyPass11/03/19 09:08 AM
5

That's brilliant.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 09:48 AM
1

Feminism is beneficial to men in the same way a hole in the head is beneficial. It's always hilliarious how man hating feminists with daddy issues try to tell the world what is good for men.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 03:22 AM
1

All the female supremacists I've ever talked to consider themselves feminists. Please refer to the 'No true Scotsman fallacy' and let us know when you want to discuss the real world.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/19 10:15 AM
2

He dodged a bullet there.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 07:03 AM
1

This isn't feminist fantasy land. It's a real issue a child is having.
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/19 07:00 AM
1

It's a reminder that on average women take more out of the system than they contribute in taxes. So it makes sence that it is just another paid day off. You've been given a dose of female privledge and it's so alien to you, you don't know what to do. Just enjoy what it is like for the average woman for a day. Get paid do nothing for work.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:43 PM
1

I haven't read his book but I think Peterson was trying to suggest how things should be. but that boat sailed long ago. Society has lost the trust of men. Society has a lot of work to do to get men to come back to the plantation. Most men haven't been able to entirely leave yet and some are preaching to men about more sacrifices men should make. What for? The reality is that western men have millions of other better options.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:35 PM
8

$50,000 is not enough. It should be over $500,000 plus all his legal costs in their entirety. She should have to hand over 30 percent of her income for the next 20 years of she doesn't have assets to pay for it. That would be fair.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:28 PM
3

Males must already been an endangered species there and yet they want to drive more of them away.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:03 PM
3

I've always found it hilliarious that a man hating feminist with daddy issues thinks she can tell a man anything at all about masculinity or what a real man would do. They wouldn't know what it takes to be a decent empathetic human being.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:29 AM
12

"If they make this one with all men and it does well which it will then it might seem that boys are better." She makes it pretty clear what is going to happen, why it's going to happen and why she doesn't like it.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:57 AM
1

I'm not sure where you have been for the last 40 years but those groups don't scare me at all. In fact I think we can give them just a tiny bit of respect. At least they are being honest that they hate men and don't want men to have rights. That's a lot more integrity than the vast majority of feminists.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:41 AM
6

My wife is also anti-feminist. Basically any decent person who actually understands what they are talking about is not a feminist. You are an egalitarian. Which is what most people are. (Not that you need a label TBH).
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:32 AM
3

action effect I agree. It is just a way to divide and conquer. Feminists have been doing this demonising of males in divorce law, then in education and now they are moving on to white men in general. They wont stop there. Next stop is all men in every situation. The race aspect is a distraction IMHO.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:15 AM
2

Femininity is not toxic. I don't see anything feminine about a treat of domestic violence. Masculinity is not toxic either. Feminism on the other hand..... Feminism gives toxicity a bad name. ​ P.S. it's a joke on twitter. Even domestic violence is OK to joke about. And I'm a male victim of domestic violence. Humans joke about taboo subjects. That's humor. If you don't like it, avoid twitter. I avoid it like the plague it is.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:11 AM
6

Let's examine the evidence. Exhibit 1: She is a racist, sexist, misandrist. Exhibit 2: She public proclaims in writing that she is a racist, sexist, misandrist. Arguments in defence: .....................................<crickets> ​ Verdict: She is indeed an idiot.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:03 AM
2

Where is the thumbs up + 1000 button when you need it?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:48 AM
9

No. They didn't need to mention poor examples of men at all. What marketing moron does that? Look at the old Gillette adds that showed great fathers, great firemen, all sorts of great examples of men. A brain damaged monkey knows that is how to inspire people. Also they have changed from being something a man can GET to preaching what a man should BE to be worthy of their over priced virtue signalling man hating razors. From offering something to condescending moralising preacher. There is absol…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:11 AM
4

Also Nike took a side in a controversial behaviour of some in one country. Gillette is attacking who their customers ARE and doing it world wide. Total and utter failure. Of course this does depend on men making good on their boycott.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:04 AM
4

This is precisely what it is all about. It's precisely the standard operating procedure in the divorce industry. Men have just sucked it up and so now they are moving against all groups of men. White ones primarily. Then the rest as well.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:01 AM
2

Masculinity can't ever be toxic. It's the essence of being male. Y chromosomes are not toxic even though feminists are determined to claim they are. Also one can't claim masculinity is toxic and then redefine this to refer to certain undefined behaviours. Masculinity is not just a set of behaviours. It's always amusing how feminists love to wave their dictionaries around over one word found in there but then there is never a dictionary to be found the rest of the time.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:40 AM
39

I don't accept this agruement when it comes to razors. Gillette is attacking masculinity on the gamble that men are so lazy and useless that they won't change their purchasing behaviour. I think Gillette have miscalculated but any man so lazy that they can't buy a different brand of razor, deserves all the disrespect that is no doubt going to keep coming his way.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 10:34 AM
1

It's not femininity which is toxic. There is nothing particularly feminine about paternity fraud. If anything it's root lies more in feminism and just being a plain shitty gold digging bitch. It's not like shitty gold digging bitches have never existed. It's just that feminism has led to their expansion. And feminism gives toxicity a bad name.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:49 PM
2

What about the SCUM manifesto? SCUM meant the Society for Cutting Up Men. Better still Rent a copy of the Red Pill movie and watch it with her.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:40 PM
1

Deleted? I think the way to make change is to ensure Gillette goes broke. Make them an example to other businesses.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:34 PM
2

I am married. but even before I was married, I reached the stage where I would not touch a western woman with a barge pole. I refuse to be alone with one unless there is CCTV. Not unless they are family or friends I have known for many years. It generally keeps me safe from any flirting western women. Women from other cultures on the other hand have flirted with me right in front of my wife. but that's another topic. Not that it happens to me every week or anything. That said its pretty obvious …
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:32 PM
3

I'm completely mystified why anyone still publishes anything Ford has to say. I'm sure they are thinking it is guaranteed click bait but that the real trend. If I see that a publication has paid Ford to write something, well that publication gets the same treatment my Gillette razor got this week. And I'm never coming back. On the other hand keeping Ford around is a sort of useful idiot for us. As long as she is there speaking as a feminist, then feminists have less room to try and claim their i…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:17 PM
3

I've been at this for 25 years. It's clear that we won't make any headway without first combating feminism. Next we need women like you. Society hasn't listened to men for 40 years. Gillette being just the latest example. However when women start advocating for men, then society starts to pay attention. This says a lot about how bad it is but this is the reality we have to deal with. When women start advocating for law changes then things will start to turn around. For example pick a topic disad…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:03 PM
6

What the F..k is child sex conduct? It's the child's conduct that is the problem? So when it's a man is pedophilia but when it's a woman it's 'child sex conduct' and 'he wanted it'.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:52 PM
3

Yeah I don't see any problem. They are desperate to aviod relegation and will try anything to aviod it. Of course she hasn't got time for stupidly phrased questions. Good for her.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:47 PM
10

Which part of divorce law in any Anglo country for the last 40 years has been about real equality? Losing his house is trivial and just an opening shot compared to what comes next.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:27 PM
5

Femininity can never be toxic. Just like masculinity can never be toxic. Feminism on the other hand.... Feminism gives toxicity a bad name.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:24 PM
1

It's not women telling men how to be a man. It's some man hating feminists with daddy issues who were probably raised by a single mother preaching to men what it means to be a man. The answer to your question is NO. It is not OK. Based on the Gillette ad they clearly have no idea what the vast majority of men are like anyway. Which confirms just how clueless on the topic they are.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:22 PM
4

Another big flaw in this feminist term is exposed when you ask a feminist to list thise behaviours. You soon discover that the list is fluid and not defined at all. You also find that some very positive male behaviour are also considered toxic masculinity. Frankly it's not up to us to agree that their terminology or claims are reasonable. It's up to them to demonstrate it. Also why is it that feminists love to wave their dictionaries around when it suits them but then hide their dictionaries the…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:17 PM
1

That's men's fault. Don't go to war to protect a system that despises your gender and shits all over you. Don't wine and dine women if there is a chance they will do the same later down the track. Personally I learnt this the hard way and stick to women from a different culture.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:05 PM
2

Yes I see now. He did not say all were rapists. He said they are bringing the worse elements of their society, which includes rapists among others. By failing to accurately report what was said the MSM loses all credibility and people are only that much more sympathetic to Trump. For a bunch of so called journalists and experts in communication the MSM are truly incompetent.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:02 PM
28

I was a victim of domestic violence. There were witnesses and everything. Of course I never retaliated because I am not violent and I was raised to never hit women. But eventually I had to get out of there for my own safety. In the divorce my lawyer warned me to never mention being a victim of domestic violence or I would lose any chance of maintaining a relationship with the kids. Turns out my lawyer was correct. It ruined me. Happens every day for the last 4 decades around the world. I'm remar…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:53 PM
2

P&G are my least favorite company for the simple reason that the hate the very essence of being male. In fact they think it toxic. They think men have to be taught to be decent human beings even though half of us have had our lives seriously screwed up by feminist ideology in one way or another. I'd better stop here because I could write a book about how hateful, bigoted and hypocritical this company is. Instead I'll just boycott them from now on.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:45 PM
6

I've been waiting for Gillette to release their video calling on women to stop being catty bitchy gold digging women abusing children, using paternity fraud, making false allegations to shutout fathers from their children's lives for their own personal reasons. You know to be better women. After all Gillette thinks this is such good massaging and they make twice as much profit selling pink razors I'm sure they are keen to complete that video. Plus the career feminist who made the male bashing vi…
/r/PussyPass18/01/19 12:21 PM
25

In other news in what has been seen as a breakthrough only a mere 187 fathers were shutout of their children's lives this week for looking funny at their ex wives. Usually thus heinous crime is applied to over 600 fathers a week.
/r/PussyPass18/01/19 12:11 PM
3

Toxic femininity is Gillette. Just ask the hundreds of workers facing redundancy within the year.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:54 AM
5

Same old responses from feminists for 40 years now. Was it a Code purple alert or a code Pink alert? Charge of Rationalization (Code Purple) – The Sour Grapes Charge Discussion: The target is accused of explaining away his own failures and/or dissatisfaction by blaming women for his problems. Example: ​ “You are just bitter because you can’t get laid.” Response: In this case, it must be asked if it really matters how one arrives at the truth. In other words, one may submit to the accuser, “What …
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:52 AM
2

It no longer surprises me that they can't see the irony and hypocrisy some man hating feminist with daddy issues who put down their "50 Shades of Grey" book long enough to try to lecture a male on what it means to be a man. As if they would have the faintest idea what it means to even be a decent, rational human being.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:45 AM
2

Gillette razors and shaving gel going in the bin today. Head and Shoulders already binned. Can anyone suggest an alternative to Vicks Vapodrops Menthol? I'm a bit addicted to the menthol sensation. I found some sugar free ones from another brand but they are honey and lemon and I can't find them in menthol. Still checking the rest of the list.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:33 AM
1

I cycle through Selsun Gold sometimes. A little goes a long way with that one. It's gold. (Couldn't resist sorry). ​
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:27 AM
13

40 years of buying Gillette products, 20 years of buying Head and Shoulders shampoo just ended today. My wife will not be buying Gillette again either. In Australia I am going to try Schick and Oscar. There are plenty of other alternatives as well. I am already looking for alternatives to Vicks products, which I have been using for 50 years. After that, I am going to keep working my way down the Procter and Gamble subsidiary list. I encourage all men and people to love men to do the same. ​ This…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:24 AM
1

Anyone pointing out the omnipresent hypocrisy and perniciousness of feminism is labeled a heretic. Er I mean labeled a woman hater. It's not as if feminists can counter the valid cristism of their ideology so name calling is their default.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 12:14 PM
8

Does any sane man out there think for half a second that if a man behaved this way and said those things in a US Airport that they would be doing anything less than 30 days in jail? What's the bet this woman never even had to attend a court?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:20 AM
1

The difference is that feminists don't particularly like cats to start with. It is just eventually cats are the only thing that will live eith them.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/19 01:48 PM
2

It's only a matter of time before the government comes after sperm donors for child support retrospectively. The sperm banks target young nieve men who don't have enough life experience to realise how the world works for this reason.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:51 PM
1

These outrageous claims that you have that people like looking at attractive people and water is wet will get you shunned and blacklisted by the thought police. I'm shocked you would write such blasphemous ideas on the internet. I'm 100% certain you have offended some feminist snowflake somewhere and obviously that can not be tolerated by the tolerant Left. I'm sure this is hate speech and you will be banned from Patreon and soon as the Safety and Trust Committee finds out about it.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 09:40 AM
1

Clearly the pressure to impose that PC censorship is coming from activists. Some would be from this group and some would be just that same hive mind mentality that is a product of feminism and the SJW bubble group think. There is a large community of these indoctrinated people, especially among younger generations because they were indoctrinated with the same ideology all though school. Many of them won't wake up to it until they get a few more real world life experiences.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 09:10 AM
7

It's not nearly enough. Students and staff need to go after these universities for 7 figure punitive damages.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:10 AM
3

In Australia one male commits suicide almost every day. 6 a week. In large part thanks to feminism. So we are addressing the mental health issue by pointing out one of the biggest root causes.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:05 AM
5

It's is sexual harassment and at one point sexual assault. Make up any euphemisms that make you feel better but it doesn't change the facts.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:45 AM
3

UN Women wrote a report demanding Chinese style censorship of the internet a couple of years ago or so. That is what I refered to. http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/9/cyber-violence-report-press-release
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:37 AM
6

One myth that the divorce industry is still trying to peddle is the idea that child custody and child support is not biased against fathers. That is of course an absurd claim but it is a common sacred cow within the industry, If any father or other person dares to claim the emperor has no clothes, then that father will not see his children. ​ To be honest, it doesn't matter what the latest myths are. Until men refuse to have children and refuse long term relationships en masse, then the system w…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 02:33 AM
1

Given she is THAT useless at basic maths, she is unemployable in any other industry.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:54 AM
14

Young man goes on feminist march not knowing his girlfriend had made a false allegation about him to organisers. On the march organisers read out names of accused men to shame them and abuse them based on just an allegation. Young man's name is read out while he is in the crowd. It just gets worse from there. Girl friend admits it was a false allegation. Mother tries to counter online abuse of her son. It gets worse. Young man commits suicide within a week of the march. Mother of young man refus…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:23 AM
16

ry behaviour? In my view, this young woman should have been charged with manslaughter or whatever the equivalent is in Argentina.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:15 AM
5

Actually they implemented this somewhere in Perth in a council owned car park as I recall. Not sure where this photo is though. They can't enforce it in Australia but they do implement it. If they ever try it in my city I would park there everyday just to annoy thrm.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 09:28 AM
8

In New Zealand this is a weekly if not daily occurrence. We can thank feminism.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:35 AM
2

It's not completely clear but it seems that this Federal ruling intends that the law be rewritten to only allow the woman to have IVF from another sperm donor where the estranged husband will have no financial, moral or physical responsibility for the child. As you say it could open the way for this to happen to a seperated husband unless the law is made much clearer.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:59 AM
2

He should be able to sue her in a civil case for far more than the child support for her fraud. In fact in a just world, this would be a criminal offence.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:53 AM
5

What is the point of having a judiciary?
/r/PussyPass27/09/18 08:45 AM
6

"She's had a difficult upbringing, she's had a difficult life but she's committed to being a better person." How friggin predictable! How many males that go before court for violent crimes, have a perfect upbringing? Yet doesn't seem to get males off scott free. I wonder why that could possibly be?
/r/PussyPass27/09/18 08:42 AM
2

I understand that the rationale is that punishing women who do this sort of thing in or after childbirth would drive them further underground rather than to seek help. I don't know if there is any real evidence to support that rationale in the modern context. This is not 1820. Last time I checked, having a vigina doesn't make a person a helpless victim sub-adult with zero empathy for a baby growing inside her. But perhaps someone could produce evidence to prove me wrong about that.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:37 AM
1

" I despise the idea of "male privilege" - it might be a fine idea, but I'll never know because like the vast majority of men all through history, "male privilege" is not something we have ever known.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:30 AM
1

Riggins v. Shannon. CiteCircuit Court of Fairfax County (VA), Case No. CL-2014-9220 Due to limits on civil defamation cases, the actual amount she has to pay is about $2.3 million apparently. "The jury did not believe Shannon or credit her allegations. After a six-day trial that ended August 1, 2017, the jurors returned a verdict in favor of Riggins, which included an award of $3.4 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, “to make sure nothing like this will ever happe…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:27 AM
2

acked off. ... She was so eva I don't think they even did that. They simply passed hi over for promotion in order to dodge any bad publicity. ​ Of course in the process, they proved to all the soldiers out there risking their lives, that the high command does not have their back and wont defend them even from some baseless allegation from decades ago - so unlikely to have their back against a real enemy. Soldiers need to wise up to the way the high command are treating them.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:34 AM
1

So called "Toxic masculinity" by feminists is a moving feast of anything about masculinity they want to attack. Feminists are saying they don't hate men. They just hate the very essence of what a man is. By some mental gymnastics feminists think this is perfectly fine. The whole expression is to dehumanise men. The first step in justifying the treatment of men as sub-humans.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:16 AM
3

The article missed out the part about after she has cheated, she will then take most of his money and the kids. It is important that men know what a one sided deal a relationship with a woman is. This should be compulsory education for teenage boys at school.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:13 AM
6

t joint custody In Australia prenups are worth less than toilet paper. Most lawyers refuse to do them because the lawyer doesn't want to get sued for creating a misleading document they knew was worthless. My understanding is that this trend is occurring worldwide now with judges routinely setting aside prenups. Apparently California is an example of this. In New Zealand men are putting all their assets into family trusts before they have any relationship but it may not be safe there and it's di…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:05 AM
7

I'm woman hear me whinge. - the new feminist song. "Many women would say things are not heavily titled towards men." - well they would be wrong and should study the facts rather than their feelings. I love how she points out the family court and other facts of real discrimination faced by men versus the trivial whinging of feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 06:01 AM
21

These false allegations are daily occurrence in family courts all over the western world. I'm sure many left wing women are shocked to discover they are held up to scrutiny in the real world.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:55 AM
14

I don't know what the laws are in Ireland. However like most western countries this is probably not a specific offense. It needs to me made one everywhere. There should be a serious crime for making a knowingly false allegation of this nature and the consequences should be jail time with serious minimum sentences.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:49 AM
1

No. They couldn't deny she made a completely unprovoked attack on me in public in front of witnesses and I've never hurt a fly in my life. What they do is they re-word everything into neutral terms. So they say there is "conflict" between the parents and so the children should live with their mother and occasionally visit the father. It's standard operating procedure in the family court when the mother is abusive. Of course the mother prevented the children seeing me at every opportunity and the…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:10 AM
4

This is child abuse. Literally. The vice principal and any other teachers or police officers involved should be held personally liable and should be sued for all their personal possessions and be left bankrupt.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:48 AM
5

This is a great step forward. All other western countries should follow Italy's progressive and constuctive lead.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:57 AM
2

THis should be a criminal matter. It is extortion and her lawyer should also be held criminally accountable. Ruining her financially is not enough. However if that is all that can be achieved then I hope she is financially ruined for life. Literally.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:34 AM
2

Things women don’t lie about: Rape. Things women don’t lie about: ..................<sound of crickets>........... ​
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:32 AM
1

Not just 'irresponsible" but pernicious.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:26 AM
2

They need feminism. They need feminism like a fish needs a bicycle. What they need is diversity of thought and the objective examination of confronting ideas. Otherwise they should be renamed as adult kindergartens.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:29 AM
8

The punishment needs to fit the crime and society needs to be kept safe. My understanding is that he sent an email to a 14 year old he is distantly related to. He claims he didn't know she was only 14. Either way, it was an email. He served his sentence and is obviously putting his life back together. Preventing him ever working with adults is not proportionate to his crime. There was no suggestion he was left alone with anyone at all. Quite the opposite as I understand it. But worse than that, …
/r/MensRights11/09/18 02:19 AM
69

I hope he bankrupts Nichole Burgan with a civil lawsuit but it doesn't sound like he will for political reasons. There needs to be a specific criminal charge for these false allegations. They create real victims. Wasting police crime is not a suitable charge. Not even close.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:43 AM
58

I was assaulted by my ex. in front of witnesses in public. Of course I couldn't retaliate and eventually I had to leave for my own sanity. My lawyer said to never mention that my ex was violent to me or else I would lose custody of the children. It turns out my lawyer was correct. So men get punished extremely harshly for being victims of domestic violence and their children suffer as well. But it doesn't matter. All must be sacrificed to the altar of feminism and the Duluth model.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:39 AM
1

What about the gender tax gap? Men pay 200% more tax than women. Women are a net economic drain on society, at the expense of men. Strong, Independent Women™ are actually a monstrous drain on men's earnings. http://judgybitch.com/2016/08/16/reblog-research-find-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/ See the research paper ‘Income and Fiscal Incidence by Age and Gender: Some Evidence from New Zealand’ has been accepted for publication by international economics journal, Review of Income and Wealth. AN…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:02 AM
2

Men are far more likely to be the victims of a violent attack while walking down the street. Men have the added threat of some random woman brushing past them and having them arrested and tried with a patently false sexual assault allegation. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/man-falsely-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-actress-feels-like-he-has-undergone-mental-torture-a6867366.html ​ But then facts never seem to make much difference to feminists' paranoid delusions.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:53 AM
1

king about thin "Never forget that ladies are to be first cared for, to have the best seats, the places of distinction, and are entitled in all cases to your courteous protection." Yet another example of how women were so oppressed in the past. ..oh wait.....
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:41 AM
1

l abortion m It is illegal in some countries. I think China (since 2005) and India are examples. Also some US states. However, that is in theory. In practice a woman is not going to give the true reason she will just make out that she is some sort of victim (if she even needs to give any reason at all). I'm not against abortion, particularly in the 3rd world but there should be controls on it. However this issue highlights that it is very difficult to impose those controls in practice. In the UK…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:26 AM
8

o m Her at 44: I am a woman. I am alone. I am only half way through my life. My career never amounted to much and the only enjoyment I get out of it is from office gossip. I finally realised that I will always be alone and it has made be bitterly unhappy. Her at 54: I am a woman. I have 5 cats. It looks like I will never have enough for a comfortable retirement. No one is willing to live with me and share the cost of living because I am a bitter old woman and I haven't even reached retirement ag…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:08 AM
26

The whole case is a summary of feminism in a nut shell. Apart from all the other daming things about this, NYU has had a policy specifically prohibiting an intimate relationship between "A faculty member and a graduate student in the same discipline or academic program" and " Although it is recognized that the student or subordinate may be a full and willing participant in an Intimate Relationship, both the responsibility for adhering to this policy and the consequences for violating it fall upo…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:53 AM
6

how homeless men practice their masculinity No she is doing more than that. She is being judgemental about their masculinity and her judgement is that their masculinity is a bad thing. She is attacking their very maleness. Their humanity. Probably the only thing they have left in the world. She wouldn't be doing it because she thinks " its not of much use". She is doing it because she wants to promote the concept of anti-masculine environments within any services these homeless men might access.…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:38 AM
6

She took grant money and used it as a tool to push her own personal agenda. She took grant money and used it as a tool to push hatred and demonisation of the most vulnerable people in society based on their gender.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:25 AM
6

This made me feel physically sick. If I was forced to sit in a room with either Pol Pot or Erin Dej I'd go with the most compassionate and empathetic one - Pol Pot. But of course remember everyone "feminists don't hate men". Yeah right!
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:23 AM
1

Hahahahahaha! Oh priceless!!! Best news I read all year!! Aint kharma a bitch! These guys did precisely the right thing. Don't like it? Return the millions of children to their loving fathers after divorce and then we might have a chat about all the other things you will have to correct before we get sucked down that rabbit hole again. Otherwise, enjoy your cats.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:56 AM
2

For some years now, I refuse to be alone with a western woman unless there is CCTV. If she is a non-western woman then I let my guard down a bit and can trust her a lot more. However if she has grown up in a feminised country then no way. Even in my private life, unless it is a family member or a woman I have known for many years, then I wont be caught alone with them. The only exception is a non-western woman who is not a stranger. I still trust them to be decent human beings. Otherwise, I try …
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:38 AM
3

New Zealand has a long standing productivity problem. For decades it has been falling down the OECD in relative terms as a result of this productivity lag. The fundamental reason for this productivity gap is that as a whole New Zealand organisations are slow to invest in people and plant when compared to other rich countries. New Zealand organisations are good at lowering costs but not at raising productivity. It is productivity which determines wealth. By imposing or even threatening to impose …
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:40 AM
1

What? I read 1984 and that detail was never mentioned. NOW you tell us!
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:09 AM
10

Wait until you or a father you know goes through a messy divorce. You'll soon discover that feminism is a most pernicious ideology and it is still the reigning ideology among those in power. However you are correct in that feminism can't survive the harsh light of exposure of it's hypocrisy and is doomed eventually.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:40 PM
1

They say that women are delaying having babies until later in life. However then never finish that sentence. They never point out that this makes the women less attractive to men, less likely to have any baby and more likely to have fewer babies if they have any at all. Also more likely to be single mothers with shitty outcomes for the children they do have.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:30 PM
4

The reality is that we are all wired to admire male action heros. That's why female action hero movies rarely do as well as expected. There have been a couple of exceptions over the years but these are rare. Usually if it's a female action hero lead, you know it's going to be lame. It's entertainment. Not social re engineering.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:21 PM
1

It might not be possible in Britain but I'd see if there is a possibility of a civil suit. Try and bleed them dry.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:13 PM
1

Would you rather handle a western, feminised woman or radio active waste? I think radio active waste is safer. You have clear protocols, safety equipment and monitoring to protect your safety. If anything did go wrong you have free health care and income protection. The more I think about it, the clearer it is that handling radio active waste is safer.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:57 PM
1

Note to self. Never compliment a French woman. To be safe I'm never going to compliment any western woman.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:51 PM
-6

To be fair you shouldn't be banned for saying that. You should be entitled to express your own view of what the interpretation of the laws should be. Even if others don't agree.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:38 PM
14

They dance around the fact that messages of Facebook demonstrate that it was a false allegation. knowling False allegations need to be made a serious offense with mandatory jail time.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:18 PM
1

I suspect that the only thing unique about this case is that the professor was honest enough to email students that such bias for women goes on.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:06 PM
1

She gets paid millions for having nice tits and acting. She have more privledges and opportunities than the vast majority of men will ever have. But it's not enough, she wants male stars to five her some of their money. If she really wanted equality then she would give up her salary to the male homeless since men are far more over represented in homeless circles. It's time Salma Hayek and similar women admit they have had a good run and now give their millions to homeless men. But of course she …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:53 PM
3

I'm not sure it will make much difference in large companies. However in small and medium companies yes they will hire less women as simple risk management from false allegations and reputational damage. And small and medium companies are the majority of the economy and the majority of the employers. It will be muted because business owners have other things to do than follow gender politics but plenty will change to protect their business. It won't be some sort of memo or official policy. It wi…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:44 PM
9

IF they were for promoting equality then yes it would be their "job". They only think it is not their "job" because they are NOT promoting equality for ALL people. Which is one of seemly endless examples of feminist hypocrisy. Funny how feminists like to wave their dictionaries around but never take the time to read one themselves.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:45 AM
3

Feminists will try to portray this as stooping to their level. However that is not the case. A Lifeline event is not an appropriate place to give a platform misandrists when the clear majority of suicides are men. It was a massive error of judgement by Lifeline. Whereas Milo invited Clementine to a debate but she declined because she knows she'd lose. A university would be an appropriate place for such extremists on both sides to express their views. A Lifeline event should be doing all it can t…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:35 AM
1

False equivalence. The purpose of a university is to expand our body of knowledge. Usually by putting forward an idea and then examining all sides of that idea in a methodical way. Hence that is actually the perfect place to have feminist man haters and also their opponents express their views. It is the purpose of a university to host and explore all kinds of offensive, unpopular, confronting views. Lifeline is a mental health support service for specific people. The clear majority of suicides …
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:25 AM
5

Not in this case. The event was for Lifeline. It was not to give a platform to debate the merits of genocide of half the population. The clear majority of suicides are men. Inviting a speaker who openly hates men for being men was a massive error of judgement by Lifeline. That organisation is supposed to be assisting men at the edge of the cliff, not helping to push them off. Milo invited Clementine to a debate. That would have been an appropriate forum for such a debate but she is too spineless…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:14 AM
18

actor in male suicide and Exactly what I was thinking. It was a massive error of judgement by Lifeline. To even consider it indicates that they are completely out of touch with the majority of those they are supposed to be helping.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter