TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VortexCortex Archive

View 2 posts and 1,020 comments by VortexCortex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,020 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Agree. Also, the Orwellian doublethink BS surrounding terms like Objectify, Privilege, Entitled causes me to use different terms with less needless additional connotations. People aren't Objectified, they're Portrayed as having Characteristics (thus we're not insulting the observer by assuming there is a prevalence of conclusive opinion: That the portrayed individual has only these traits). People don't have Privileges (these are things you're allowed to assert at will, like staying up past 9pm)…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:19 PM
19

It's mens fault for putting up with it. Ah yes. Historical revisionism. Blaming one sex for being born into a culture of gender stereotypes which emerged from biological biases rooted in millions of years of evolution. Sorry mate, it's not men's fault. It's everyone's fault for not using their rational minds to escape their instinctual biases or the social norms that emerge from them. Your blaming men is just as fucked in the head and hypocritical, fool. You're not blaming women for their fuckin…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:13 AM
9

Haha Ha. No males allowed. That's rich! Hint: #1 paying demographic will be otaku guys who are long time fans despite the "creeper" stigma. This show panders to them with mild to moderate innuendo, always has, and this new rendition will likely have more "fan service" (panty gag shots). Not sure they're trying to piss off their core revenue stream. It's probably a propaganda stunt for "Girl Power" to drum up more female fans (see: above pandering heavy in the industry currently) + encouragement …
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:07 PM
36

"Is everything OK?" Well, fuck no. Have you seen the news lately? That whole PRISM thing really pisses me off. [Helping the GF up, put her coat on] Did you vote for the current president? That Obama guy?! Middle name Husein, yeah, like the Sadam fellow -- Are they just trolling us now or what? [walking towards the door] -- Well, nevermind, my girlfriend here did, didn't you honey? That's the thing though, I wouldn't blame her because he was saying all the right things about being more transparen…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 04:21 PM
3

They're legally allowed to chant and stomp and drown out the speaker Disturbing the peace is illegal. They can chant and picket outside, and shout at folks coming and going, but to drown out the speaker deprives others the right to listen... Others who paid to have the event. Not really disagreeing, just pointing out that at the platform while someone is expressing their idea is not the time and place to protest it. Folks can never adopt new opinions if they never listen, thus others must be giv…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 08:33 AM
1

They think God is one lazy bastard? I say let God do his own damn work. I may be biased though, God and I are not on speaking terms.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 07:45 AM
1

Hmm, here I am wondering how else feminists could increase the "wage gap"... And now I know!
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:54 AM
2

studying the female side of things Sexists gonna sexist. Which side of anything doesn't affect both genders? Gendering a non gendered topic is sexist. For example: MRAs consider both female and male sides of issues like birth control. Most agree that men shouldn't be able to force women to have abortions, but since women can take morning after pills and abort and even give up the kid for adoption or just drop them off at a safe house with no questions asked and no 18 years of child support -- Th…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:40 PM
1

A lot of the women who I spoke to after the exam were open and understanding of the criticism of the article and to the wider concerns of men and saw them as valid, but only when the topic was broached very carefully. These are intelligent people but people who have only been exposed to one side of an issue are going to go away with a biased perspective. Sorry to say it, but that makes them not very intelligent. Intelligent folks don't require delivery of facts to be careful or pander to their f…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:31 PM
10

Whenever I'm accused of "mansplaining", I simply point out that it was actually an explanation, and that gendering that which is gender neutral is sexist by definition. Their rationalization hamster* doesn't have to run far before they dub this "mansplaining" too. * anyone can have such a beast spinning away in their mostly empty heads.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:12 PM
3

Yes, and the fucked up thing is that if the accusation is true, then the tribunals are just giving the rapist a slap on the wrist so they can go on to rape more people instead of being in jail. Now wonder Feminists are pro-star-chamber, it creates more victims for them to farm. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:15 AM
3

Fear is only part of the response. Aggression is also a healthy and natural response to violence. It's sexist that men are prohibited from retaliating in the face of a woman's violence, and bottling up aggression can lead to even more dire outcomes. My ex was a bit of a tom-boy and used to tease me all the time about silly stuff, e.g., shit talking about how many more digital Piñatas came to her garden than my stinky pigsty in Viva Piñata video game. When I'd reciprocate and tease her back, say …
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:11 AM
1

she can see herself a certain way instead. Diamond Studded?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 05:28 AM
6

Not all men They concede that it is not all men, however this is not progress. Everyone who generalizes accepts that outliers will exist. When they say, "pointing out individual exceptions" it means that they are still applying the hateful rubbish to the majority of men. In other words, they're saying that when they say "men" they mean "most men", and that pointing this out derails the message. Now, not all generalizations are invalid; However, the generalizations being levied at men by feminist…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 05:10 AM
1

and that any broad brush description is often unfair to a lot of people who happen to be male and are anything but privileged. This is identity politics. It's bogus because if you don't fit their victim narrative, then you don't get the "extra special help" they lobby to provide for others. If you're categorized as belonging to a majority group of race or sex then you're denied services on the basis of your sex and/or race. Thus, the construction of group identities (identity politics) leads to …
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:09 PM
4

Well, one side actively lobbies against MRAs when we find some folks in need and try to start helping. So, yeah.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 10:48 AM
2

the "entire concept of feminism" isn't what's being attacked by MRA's, Actually, I do try to dismantle the entire concept of feminism. That any individual in need should be excluded from concern or assistance on the basis of their race or gender is against my core values, but government programs which benefit females and minorities exclude equally disadvantaged males and majorities. The Feminists that are shaping public policy believe in "Substantive Equality" -- This means excluding certain ind…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:46 PM
3

Oh, please, it's much easier than that. This is White Male Privilege: A black girl and white boy growing up in the ghetto will both be disadvantaged. However, there are government programs for education assistance, entrepreneurship grants & loans, homes for the battered exclusively for females and minorities. The poor white boy will be excluded from these programs on the basis of his race and/or sex. That is White Male Privilege: The cold shoulder of society; Another name for racism and sexism. …
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:56 AM
1

See also: The Fanboi Effect
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:41 AM
2

And you don't get people out of cults by going Apparently, you've never gotten anyone out of a cult before... That's exactly how I got a friend of mine out: Demonstrating what their fellow cult members thought was a proper way to deal with a pesky outsider. Next time you might want to do some thinking before gibbering like a loon. Evidence, do you speak it? You think folks in r/feminism(s) seeing others getting booted for talking about men's issues isn't going to affect any of them, then I've go…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:22 AM
4

Cat's is, hmm... better... If one approaches it as a satirical post-modernist social commentary about how crappy musicals can be while still being considered "good". It's like when my philosophy professor put on an episode of the child's program "Blues Clues" and then had us discuss the deep philosophical meanings embedded in the show. Our homework assignment was about Confirmation Bias. That man is a god among men.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:29 PM
5

I go overboard because I'm doing research on behavioral prediction, so I have an excuse, but even if I didn't have the project I'd still record at least audio. I have a Sansa Clip+ and/or my smart phone recording the audio around me all the time. I save text messages and emails, backed up in multiple places. I have motion activated and infrared cameras in every room of my house except the bathroom. I keep the details of risky situations such as being alone with someone on file. I was there so it…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:47 PM
15

This is why I keep saying humans need to be aware of their biological drives because they are slaves to them otherwise. Before I bash the girl just let me just say: I've seen men do some shit too, and it's usually different shit, but they can be just as primitive minded. To me it's just sad. One can see the baser reproductive drives playing out in this female. She is not being rational: Her desires and impulses become actions before she even realizes what she's doing, acting on feeling more than…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:25 PM
33

From a evo psych standpoint the behavior was perfectly understandable. It fits the narrative of the primitive ape who wants a family and is rejected, and then lashes out to destroy the social standing of others.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:07 PM
2

emigrate from this planet. Early adopters always have a rough time, but once they realize you must "dig in" to avoid cosmic rays, I'm down. Cap over a crater or cave with leaded glass, and get some ecosystems growing. Hell yeah. Women can have Venus, let men be from Mars. There will be some actual hardships so that "feminism" shit (greater representation without the effort or responsibly) will go right out the window. Problem is, soon as things are easy and comfortable, it'll be just like this w…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:35 AM
2

Women in UofT are a majority of minorities. Your white male cisgendered definitions mean nothing, and neither will a degree soon thanks to degree mills and the net. Let the entitled SJWs have colleges, we have makerspaces, hackerspaces, community chem labs, gamejams, and libraries -- Places that require effort to achieve goals, and success proven by merit, not victimhood. Final exams are worthless and necessitate additional testing preemployment anyway. The increasing use of entrance exams for j…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:31 AM
4

If only we could do the same with foreskin.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:28 PM
3

feminists says they want equality they're not lying they really do want equality. Yes, except feminists define equality as sexist and racist benefits that exclude disadvantaged people purely on the basis of race or sex. MRA's want equality under the law, which is a very different thing than the bigoted tripe that Feminists advocate for under the guise of "substantive equality". The "noobs" of feminism think the "equality" they're fighting for is actual equality under the law, but it is not: They…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:26 PM
2

Congradulations! You have a rational mind! The very same sort of thing happened to me. I was even planning on starting my own men's movement to deal with the issues and was floored when I found out that one existed, but it was so reviled by feminists and buried in search results full of misinformation -- Even among the supposed "Rational" (RationalWiki) folks I thought I identified with -- that I either dismissed or remained ignorant of the Men's (Human) Rights Movement: MRM or MHRM (I use the t…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:01 PM
3

Women's anger is accepted because they're not seen as dangerous, and thus their anger is frequently dismissed or excused while their message has a higher chance of getting through. Men's anger is seen as far more threatening, thus it's sometimes easier to get initial attention but more difficult get a message across instead of having folks focus on the anger or perceived threat. The lower-level lizard brained fight-or-flight instinct of humans will typically fire when confronted with threatening…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:22 AM
4

Sounds like a Professional Offense Taker to me. You could have said, "I bet you just love kitties." and she'd have gotten bent out of shape about your insinuation of bestiality. The bitch is an irrational cunt. Words are not bad. No one can offend you, you have to take offense yourself. No one can take responsibility for the state of your own mind but yourself. This whole blame shifting to the speaker for the emotional state of the listener is bullshit of the highest degree, don't buy into it. D…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:24 AM
1

Of course "blur everything" is ridiculous, that was the point. Are you daft? I was being facetious. However, not posting any screen-shots is the only way to actually prevent the "don't link" and "don't make it easy to harass someone" behavior the rules are trying to prevent quite ineffectively... Which is my other point. Enforcing an ineffective rule that does not punish the true offenders is a classic Police State tactic. However, instead of actually doing something to stop harassment you just …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:58 AM
2

I don't think they were really mocking guys without beards. It's an obvious exaggeration. Eg: "Man, spinners on rims are, like, everywhere, ya know? Like, if you don't have spinners you're Nobody." To me that seems like a parody of the trend follower. Some women like hirsute men, some don't. Who cares, it's not like the opinion of two annoying women are representative of any more than those two women's opinions. Don't be like the moronic feminists and try to say otherwise. It's just a fucking co…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:45 PM
3

CS and Programming are largely seen as sort of different things in academia. It's that whole Theory vs Practical use thing. IMO, there's no such distinction: Nature draws no dividing lines, but not everyone agrees. Take the application of Theory which kept Hash Tables out of C++ standard for a decade because they almost always have close to constant time performance on average use, but have an O(n) worst case scenario (iterating a single bucket's list). So, red-black trees with O(log n) performa…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:27 AM
10

I think there is a difference between being anti-feminist and being critical of parts of feminism that contribute to issues the MHRM cares about. I think you may be conflating Feminism with Women's Rights. Anti-feminism is not mutually exclusive with Women's Rights. The "part of feminism" that MRAs don't have a problem with isn't exclusive to feminism, i.e., isn't really a part of feminism. In the same way that Humanists go on about "Human" Rights, but anti-ideology Cybernetic Rights Activists d…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 05:31 AM
16

With all the sex, theft, violence, killing, torture (even of kids), I think it's a huge assumption to think a rape was thrown in there explicitly for ratings. I mean, if this is a "rape culture" no one would notice, eh? Of course you could argue that everything in the show is done "for the ratings", but that's a pretty low bar. In other words: I don't think SJWs or feminists need to be antagonized for the professional offense justice league to get bent into high gear. I mean, you could say, "Chi…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:08 AM
5

thus normalizing the very concept of filicide as somehow indicative of behaviors which all women express to some degree You are now aware that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is a made up disease to excuse the smothering of infants.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:31 AM
2

Equal pay for Equal Child Labor! No, seriously. When I was 8 I taught myself BASIC by reprogramming Apple IIe games despite teachers trying to prevent me from learning how to insert swear words into games (turn on before inserting disk, type "list", and have fun). I mowed hundreds of lawns to earn enough to buy my first computer, Operating System, and C compiler (BASIC was too slow to do much graphics). I assembled hardware and software with Zero assistance -- There were no mentors or free tutor…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:20 PM
2

I've always thought that both movements have their place in the world Why? Feminism is an ideology. Men's Rights and Women's Rights are Human rights, but ideologies are just bullshit. Reality has never matched the feminist ideology's historical revisionism. As an MRA I advocate for Men's Rights. I don't oppose women's rights, but feminism does oppose men's rights. In fact, I see myself as a Women's Rights Activist too. Rights advocates need a clear and open mind, free of ideological narratives t…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:53 PM
1

Hmm. Well, I clean myself properly so I don't drip urine or smear shit onto my clothes. No need for underwear at all unless it's cold. That triples the lifespan of a pair right there.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:32 PM
2

Feminists killed it when they redefined equality as "substantive equality" (which means sexist and racist inequality to make up for the alleged sins of some fictional grandparents). Feminists: "Men can stop rape." 1) If they could then they wouldn't get raped, eh? 2) "Women can stop rape." <- That's something you'll never see from these "equality" loving fools. Feminist positive reinforcement would be, "I appreciate how you didn't try to rape me when you gave me a ride home. Good Job, guy."
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:03 AM
3

And then probably not give a damn about some tin-can sounding audio recording, either.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:57 AM
5

"[Stop n Go] needs to protect [customers] from folks who steal." "[Cities] need to protect [people] from citizens who commit crimes." Wrong. The supreme court ruled that police are not obligated to protect anyone, they bring in criminals to prevent repeat crime. It is you duty to protect yourself, that's why the 2nd amendment exists. It is a huge failing in the justice department to allow people to successfully sue colleges for lack of "protection". That's what led to rape tribunal star chambers…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:43 AM
2

because mugging isn't normalized in those areas. Ah yes, because if you're going to mug someone, you don't go to rich areas to make the risk doing the of mugging worth while. Never. Protip: Follow the money. Mugging isn't normalized in the ghetto (only a crack head would mug a poor person), it's just that cops patrol the rich neighborhoods more. I don't live in a bad part of town at all and there have been 4 muggings in my neighborhood in the past 2 months. Guess what everyone's, including the c…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:35 AM
-1

The answer to life should never be death. One day we will have the technology to eliminate all diseases and pain, and then your sentiment won't be fucking stupid. If you or a loved one finds yourselves looking at another 8 or more years of excruciating pain, bed ridden, every dignity stripped away, while the body rots before your eyes, and your family is immensely burdened both emotionally and financially by the needless suffering... You'll look back at your small minded sentiment and realize th…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:48 AM
1

Hey, it's user submitted data! As long as they're not editorializing said data, that is, as long as they're allowing users to submit it without oversight or editorial modification of the comments themselves, then the DMCA protects AVfM under the Safe Harbor Provisions which likewise protect Reddit from being held liable for displaying what users post.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:55 PM
5

Indeed. I have even heard the ridiculous label of "Uncle Tom" bandied about in reference to aforementioned black men. It's disgusting how divisionism is conquering the world.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:10 PM
7

but no injustice is being done to men by the fact that they are not expected to wear dresses. It's totally fine to be surprised at oddities. There are going to be generalizations, but there are always going to be outliers. What I object to is when men or women who don't meet someone's expectations translates into them being shamed by others for their surprising behaviors. I think some SJW folks get overly sensitive. See: Pronoun outrage, and gender "fluid" soup. Some "feminist" idiots think we s…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:10 PM
51

I like this: Johnny Depp does a similarly good job of refusing to take the bait in this clip from the Late Show with David Letterman. Letterman queries his rationale for wearing a women’s engagement ring. Depp just plays dumb and ultimately says that it didn’t fit his fiancée, but it did fit him. So… shrug. Brilliant repurposing of the Self Christmass Gift by Proxy, "Oh, you don't like it? A shame I thought we had similar tastes; Well it fits me just fine, I'll take it then if you don't want it.…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:35 PM
9

Hmm. Chalmer's article is another data point supporting my "nice guy" hypothesis. Lots of people have such a stupid idea of what a MGTOW is. Many think we're bitter sexless neckbearded virgins frustrated because we can't get laid; While a rare few fit this description, in most cases this couldn't be further from the truth. I used to be the nice guy. I've dated girls who were simply ready to be in long term relationships, multiple times. I've had children, and fostered others as the nicest guy I …
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:33 AM
2

Didn't your mother anything? You accidentally a "fucking".
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:47 PM
55

Feminists dismiss mere women and hold men on in high esteem (but mask it with bitterness and jealousy). I agree. Feminism holds men in high esteem, but an individual man is shamed. Feminism paints women as helpless, but an individual woman is empowered. This Orwellian double think knows no bounds. That's why they think portrayal of women in media as sexy is unhealthy objectification, but a woman should be able to dress sexy without consequences -- Just don't get into media, sexy empowered lady, …
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:43 PM
2

learn how to survive in the wild without any of our modern comforts (and drink his own piss). Been there, done that. don't forget to press the big red button.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:37 PM
9

Trigger Warnings trigger me, you insensitive clod!
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:31 PM
0

It seems that way, but as a scientist I reserve my agreement until my position is verified by experimental evidence. While it may be that "more 'Feminists' are becoming less pro-equality and becoming more anti-men's rights", one must consider the null hypothesis: Perhaps the increase in anti-men's rights statements is not due to the feminists becoming less pro-equality. Perhaps the feminists have always been against men's rights, and the observer is only now paying attention to the issue at hand…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:03 PM
9

This is overly intellectual. No such thing. We're talking about the interaction between millions of years of evolution and decades of socialization. Your statement is overly reductionist. I frequently find folks being narrow minded fools and trying to apply evolutionary psychology without knowing dick about evolution. Unfortunately MGTOW "philosophy" is rife with contributions of such fools as Barbarosa and Stardusk. Evolution is mature, it does not just care about fucking. In fact, mating is me…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:32 PM
13

This is rife in philosophy, and should be expected of such a BS non-evidentiary pseudo science. The dean won't care, or they might but won't be able to do shit. The whole institution is probably chock full of SJW nutters and PC thought police. Philosophy, the only academic field wherein Feminism can actually exist for decades without being thoroughly debunked. Sorry mate, you're screwed if you think that the whole field isn't fucked. I say so all the time, massive down-votes for my unpopular opi…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:03 AM
1

That is Hillarious! April fools, yes, but it's terrifying too... Really does sound adj. as of or like something Hillary Clinton would say. "She was just being Hillarious when she mentioned that women and children are always the primary victims of war."
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:13 AM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/23ij7t/for_the_third_time_in_two_years_feminists_at_a/cgxd6h1 Not that it actually matters, they don't use the CSS hack, alas it's a rule.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:47 AM
-5

What about SIDS? Let's look at some factors that cause "SIDS" (which is a made up disease to excuse mostly mommy murderers). smoking, drinking, or drug use during pregnancy poor prenatal care mothers younger than 20 overheating from excessive sleepwear and bedding stomach sleeping; "re-breathing" causing lack of oxygen. Sounds like the mysterious crib death myth is just infants being suffocated, but oh gosh, young party-hard mothers would never do such a thing.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:12 PM
1

Ugh. Who do you think men go off to war to protect? Certainly not the fellow foot soldiers. What about Cleopatra, Helen of Troy or let's try Eleanor of Aquitaine, you know, Richard's Mum. Her headstrong careless devaluation of life got lots of folks killed just to play soldier and have tea in a far off land. Oh, but I suppose if it's just men dying on your behalf it's not violence. No one FORCES you to die for your rulers... It's not like defecting isn't perfectly allowed. Won't even mention Tha…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:51 PM
5

Here are 286 studies in which women are as aggressive or more aggressive than men. Keep in mind that in the past the chivalrous all male juries and judges would rarely even convict female serial murderers. A large part of the Men's and Women's movements were to get female jurors and judges so that society would even punish women for murder. Today we still have a massive bias whereby the temporary insanity defense is leveraged quite successfully and regularly by women, even when (especially when)…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:48 PM
8

At least the rockets will look largely the same: Space Dildos.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:37 PM
3

"Shut Up And Code!" That's what the girls and guys at my gamedev group tell SJW morons when they start railing against the "sexism" in our game industry. We've seen far too many girls and guys show up, then bail after they figure out that it's going to take a big sacrifice and lots of hard thankless work to create something that few people will ever appreciate or praise you for. The "bailer" type invariably begin talking about how cool and prestigious it will be to have their awesome game idea m…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:57 AM
3

The silly thing is, the 'men' or 'man' part is gender neutral. If they knew anything about the etymology of 'women' it would be the 'wo' part they'd take issue with. Distancing themselves from the 'men' part via 'womyn' is distancing themselves from the human part of that word.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:04 PM
7

You say hero, I say victim of plutocratic politics.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:02 PM
3

Wage gap has always been a myth. Look at any study and compare never married women and men of comparable age, experience and job position. The women make the same or more. If women earned less than men for the same work, no business would ever hire men, and they'd shave 23% off their payroll expenses.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:53 PM
6

No, in fact, it will help our cause because it will inform him of what positions in the canadian government are held by key opposition. Alerting other MRAs, Feminists, Child Rights, Civil Rights, whomever will listen to denounce said folks would be very helpful, and may be the only way to get comparable funding for men's issues. FYI: Men's issues are silenced by the Canadian Minister for the Status of Women, and etc. human rights ministries. These feminists control the discourse, it's easy for t…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:44 PM
7

That would be nice, but our biggest opponents to men's shelters are feminists who oppose men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:38 PM
3

No one will help you rise up, proletariat, you have to do it yourself!
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:24 PM
8

Why do they keep saying MRA's are rape apologists? Has anyone here seen rape apology anywhere? We are very sorry that people get raped... ^- Rape apology?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:17 PM
2

This guy when full retard. So much confirmation bias, it's nearly unbearable to read. Not to diminish the pain of his suffering or the crime, but his reaction to the trauma reminds me of kids who are terrified of all clowns because one startled them. He needs counseling, bad. Think about it. If his image of men is so bad he may find himself rationalizing becoming a monster equivalent to that flawed image himself (he is a "man" too, after all), and then seek to correct the evils of society that h…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:45 PM
2

Interpretor encountered a fatal exception: Parsing failed due to 1 error(s). Syntax error: line 1: near 'Complete': Halted at Turing's Problem with Gödel's Theorem of Incompleteness.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:29 AM
2

You got: No, you’re not a feminist. Shame.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:24 AM
3

All I can say is that such a discussion can wait until there are more equal opportunities available to women and minorities Considering that such equal opportunity has been fully available for over three decades, I would suggest you rethink things a bit. First, that women's and men's bodies are very different, and brains are not immune to sexual dimorphism -- they're even bathed in different hormone soups. So, consider that women and minorities ALREADY HAVE equal opportunity and that women and m…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:54 AM
3

Well, it's complexity of the whole brain that matters when it comes to smarts. Eg: Elephants and whales have bigger brains than humans, but they're not smarter. Not saying size doesn't yield differences, or that it doesn't impact number of neurons available, just that size differences may produce different outcomes than one may first think. I'm interested as to the other effects that size differences might cause. Neurotransmitter chemicals present at a synapse must be cleared away before that si…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:22 AM
1

This new citrus apple tree is going to take the world by thorn!
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:40 AM
2

how exactly do they know what those men think unless they are actually real and vocal misogynists? Wait, you don't believe 1984's thought crime should be a real thing? Man, you must have taken it as a warning against socio-political thought control instead of the bright path for feminists and SJWs alike to forge ahead into a new era where thought crime would be eliminated. You dun goofed.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:36 AM
2

Well, yes, of course people with disadvantages are granted available accommodations. The problem is that disadvantaged women and minorities should have accommodations that disadvantaged white males do not get. You see, white privilege and male privilige makes up for the disadvantage. So, being turned away from shelters or government funds based solely on whether you are white or male is not racist or sexist at all, it actually is equality -- And it saves money too! Not granting support to whites…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:27 PM
6

He has a point. How do you define the differences between nature and nurture between the two genders? It's called cross cultural sex differences. When the trend persists given different nurture methods then it is nature. Ape children get scared of the dark and seek safety in numbers cross-species. That is a nature, not nurture. They also suckle right out of the womb (even before leaving the womb). That is a natural instinct. While NDT is out of his depth on the issue of "equal opportunity", he's…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 10:49 PM
3

Her views on freedom of speech on campuses being in a bad way are mirrored by those of FIRE. In some ways I think the institution of College is becoming obsolete. There is little they can offer that the Internet, makerspaces & hackerspaces do not. With the advent of world wide information networks we really don't need to pay expensive gatekeepers of information silos for the right to be employed anymore. The degree mills have devalued their own products, and businesses and workers are waking up …
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:44 AM
1

You might want to contact CAFE, NCFM, etc. It's not like the lack of men's shelters has been completely ignored by Canadian MRAs. Here's GWW/Karen Straughn on Earl Silverman, which you may find relevant. The silencing of men's issues by the Canadian Minister for the Status of Women, and etc. human rights ministries is your biggest opponent, not just Internet feminists and inaction. The oppression of men in Canada is actually systematic and purposeful. The evidence of domestic violence parity is …
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:51 PM
8

it should instead be on fighting for men's rights where those rights are missing Considering that when we advocate for men's rights, our activism is opposed by feminists, I think your stance quite ignorant of the current issues the MRM faces. We can not advance if we do not oppose those who have been very effective at marginalizing our issues and silencing us. How can we advocate effectively if our opposition is allowed to silence even speaking out about our issues, if not by opposing such femin…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:47 PM
12

As annoying as it must be to hear this is what white privelge looks like. No, a privilege is something you're allowed to do. It's an available action granted. Like being able to stay up past 9pm on a school night. That's a privilege. If you're older you are not "age privileged" because you're more likely to have an older bedtime, your parents may not grant you that bed time. It's not "white privilege" if you find yourself among a majority of whites. You've made a claim that race lines can make a…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:01 PM
4

"The End of Men: And the Rise of Women" Otherwise known as, "Futaniri on Top", foreword by Wil Wheaton titled "Oh god. Please, don't be a dick."
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:00 PM
2

"Why Do Men Assume They're So Great?" Honey, have you seen men? They are friggin' awesome! No, seriously. They really are.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:55 PM
1

This sums up my thoughts on all things Wil Wheaton.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:41 PM
19

Indeed. In my experience most feminists are useful idiots. That's why the NAFALT argument is so bogus.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:37 PM
3

No, if he cared about gender inequality he would buy the same clothes for himself and his wife. Problem solved, Next!
/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:14 PM
3

Its like 1984, when we really start to believe in lies and make them truths - also we KNOW, that they are lies. Note that the book was important, but also that it was a commentary on ideas about political manipulation of society that had been around for a long time. Orwell was great, but the problem of feminism is one of political control. You can see the same thing in the Vatican and other religious bullshit that has its hooks in humanity. And yes, you are right. Rationality is the immune syste…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 02:05 PM
2

By the same token a woman getting an IUD or tubal ligation or taking birth control should discuss such things with their significant other. Either party should inform the other of their birth controls in use. Even if the spouse has no power to prevent such things, it would be unethical to secretly seek sterilization especially if one suspects the other party may want to have children. Indeed that may even be grounds for break-up. Procreation is an important factor in long term relationships. I w…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:24 PM
2

Negative. That would be like thinking a non-drinker can't have an opinion on prohibition. Such would be completely ignorant of human cognition. We begin learning as babies by mimicking others -- We model the experience of others within our minds. Humans are excellent at it, that's why books, plays, movies, games, etc. are so compelling. Humans empathize. Put it this way, you don't have to be a rape victim to understand rape is bad. You don't have to be a homeless man to sympathize with their pli…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:24 PM
10

Never. It has almost happened, even in DV research, but it's very rare. If they admit that the abuse is comparable between sexes then the feminist researcher is no longer a real feminist. To a feminist, stepping on cracks absolutely breaks mother's backs, everyone knows this fact: 1/4 mothers will have broken backs in their life-times. Teach men not to step on cracks! They search until they find an instance of evidence that confirms their bias, and they're done. They then seek to outlaw crack st…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:33 AM
1

"Paging Doctor Strong" That's what they do if you're too rowdy in the hospitals in Texas. Then a bunch of burly nurses grab you, restrain you, haul you out by your ears. Restraint isn't "damages" so there's no assault, and the cops will side with the docs and nurses. Or let me put it this way, I have all kinds of screws and plates holding my face together. The plastic surgeons were great so you really can't tell, but one errant slap really could kill me. You gonna stand by like a dumbass and and…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:05 PM
2

Uh, the show you're looking for is called, "America's Funniest Home Videos" that's AMFV or AFV, because screw your freedom-hating initialism rules. America, Fuck Yeah!
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:58 PM
5

Privilege - n. a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group of people. This would imply that the "privilege" is not available or granted to others except a select group of people. Ergo none of the "privileges" feminists tell you to check actually exist. For example: A poor white boy growing up in the ghetto is just as disadvantaged as his minority neighbors. He is not "privileged" by being male or white, and in fact frequently faces racism bei…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 08:44 PM
1

Well, lack of votes could have something to do with that blog's unfortunate design. The link to Angry Harry himself has no permanence However, you may also like his other articles on debunking the narrative of feminism. I fully agree that history should be VERY important to people, especially to MRAs, considering their history. Without a correct historical narrative all sorts of cognitive dissonance can be leveraged. First comes the fallacy that the sins of the grandparents should be paid by the…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 01:42 PM
18

I agree. It's the low hanging fruit. If society didn't bais people into lifestyles/jobs based on their gender then everyone would be in fields that best suited them. Prove that this isn't already the case. More egalitarian cultures yield greater gender differences. You have no evidence that social pressures are causing any sex differences, but we have cross-cultural (thus not societal) evidence that the sexes are different. If you make a claim you need to prove it before you should believe it. T…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:42 AM
13

what would you call it. Ouch. The Orwellian Newspeak language destruction! It burns! I typically speak in terms of Sexual Advantages and Strengths, or conversely Disadvantages and Weaknesses. Privilege is a binary social status you either have or do not have it, and are able to leverage it if you do have the privilege. Whereas, an advantage or strength is something you can try to leverage, but may not be successful at given your personality, situation, the other parties around you, etc. Strength…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:46 PM
2

There is no biological reason why females should not be just as good at and interested in science as males. You have no evidence for this claim. In fact we only have evidence against the claim that men and women's brains and bodies are not different, i.e., we know that men and women are different. Nearly every mental task humans do is biologically biased. Otherwise you'd find tribes of humans that get around by rolling on their bellies or only crawling or walking around on their hands instead of…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:45 PM
2

that /r/FearMe subreddit. At first I was like: ... Then I was like: ◉ ● ◉
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:22 PM
2

/me tips his fashionable fedora.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:16 PM
11

Mens Rights and Women's Rights are not male or female centric. The rights of men and women affect both women and men. However, Feminism focuses on women's issues to the exclusion AND OPPOSITION of men's rights. As an MRA I advocate for Men's Rights. I also support Women's Rights. However, Feminism is an ideology. I am anti-ideology, and thus anti-feminist. Rules for thinking are not sentient, only people are. We can advocate for the rights of men and women case by case on the basis of fairness w…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:30 PM
12

Otherwise known as Standpoint Theory.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:11 PM
15

Hmm. Wouldn't a 16 year old 100 years ago be considered a -84 year old? No offense, I'm just not familiar with chrono-displacement victim terminology. In all seriousness though, it's not just 100 years ago. Go to a 3rd world country and you see very young kids helping to cook, hunt and butcher animals, collect wood, contribute to their family or community, etc. Now, granted, some hardships like getting faces full of smoke while keeping a fire going are bad (and some folks are trying to help howe…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:32 PM
7

I mean, we don't identify with the divorce, If you get married you might. Consider the women who bring their "sole and separate property" to a marriage and get to keep it upon divorce, while in many places men are not allowed this, and what they bring to a marriage is split up. So, perhaps some gay men would like to have "sole and separate property" laws too in their marriages? Or maybe that part of law is sexist and should be removed? That's just one issue, there are many many others. child cus…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 06:02 PM
2

Instead of trying to circumvent the rule in creative ways, why not accept that the goal is to avoid people being harassed and just post screenshots with redacted personal information? No, you see, there's this thing called Google, see: I can find anyone who says anything online with a search of the text regardless of whether it was screen-shotted or not. So, if the rule is to "avoid people being harassed" then the rules should say either: Blur all names and text in the screenshot so that the com…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:34 PM
-3

"passing the buck" AKA: Selective enforcement of the law. The prime modus operandi of all police states.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:24 PM
2

I believe this subreddit even has an official twitter. Shhh! You don't want to dox them as being from here!
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:23 PM
3

What are you talking about? "claptrap" is exceedingly foolish pandering rhetoric to cheaply win applause. It's been in use for a couple of hundred years at least. Why would you go to Wikipedia or Urban dictionary when Google exists, and so does Merriam Webster? If I told you it was raining soup, would you go get a fork?
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:19 AM
-6

I mostly agree with you, except when you assert you know what a real man is. Agree. Real men do what they feel is right and do not follow strict rules imposed by others regarding their actions. Wait, what? Hypocrite: "you assert you know what a real man is." Prove they can't be a follower of strict rules or expectations of others regarding their actions? Practice what you preach.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:05 AM
10

Granted, I am assuming the sane feminists and MRAs. Why would you make that assumption? I would instead compare the activists that matter, those actually in places of influence in feminism, like professors or Mary Koss of the CDC, etc, and the MRAs actually giving talks in public, at universities and political groups (while being silenced by feminists and with the support of their professors who dismiss men's issues or feminist's actions as outright "false" or "lies", even when confronted with r…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:25 PM
-1

4 words: Fifty Shades of Gray.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:45 PM
0

While I agree with this, when it comes time to lay folks off it's the singles that should go first. Unfortunately, it's usually the ones with families and higher insurance burden to the company that fall under the knife. So, higher paid and first to knife vs less pay and better chance of survival? Not saying it's right, but is it really "abominable" considering in a down economy insurance costs are frequently considered against employing the applicants with families? Or, let me put it this way: …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:33 PM
4

Everyday new people are clicking on this sub, after learning about MRA's and the MRM from outside sources. They then encounter a page of crybabies and leave with the now re-enforced notion that we are just a bunch of dudes that can't get laid. You're a fucking concern troll.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:23 AM
3

All politicians are like that for all causes. Leverage them the best you can. It sucks that they pay lip service to get votes, but they wouldn't do so if the ignorant masses actually gave a damn. It's a purposefully broken system. Your votes don't matter. The only thing that affects change is activism anyway. Concentrate on that. You can win government support through shame, and given the mud slinging arena that politics is, Men's Rights activists will have to do some of the same to win panderin…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:13 AM
1

The admins want to ban the MR sub because some of them are SRS. Fuck the biased admins. This sub very well may be removed at any moment for any reason. I'm prepared. Are you? Protip: np.reddit link does nothing on most subs. Some subs use it to prevent participation using CSS, and if they do then linking there with np.reddit should be enforced, but np does not work for AskReddit. See for yourself: http://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/22idmj/whats_a_fact_thats_technically_true_but_nobody/cgn…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:05 AM
1

I notice this kind of feminism growing on college campuses- am I right to feel worried? Ah yes, the straw feminist. No worries mate, according to SJWs this type of feminist doesn't exist and are actually shunned by real feminists. In all seriousness, this is why I am more vehemently opposed to feminism than any other popular bullshit ideology. These hateful misandrists lay the groundwork for others to breed hate through application of increasingly obfuscated sexism and purposefully leverage cogn…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:26 AM
4

The feminist's definition of equality. No, really.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:51 PM
-5

Are you sure they weren't just ugly women? /s
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:50 PM
2

"You would label a whole movement based on a few fringe extremists? NAFALT!"
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:48 PM
4

If peahens want pretty feathers too they're going to have to stop being so discriminating against peacocks, and let the peacocks be the choosy ones for a few hundred thousand years. Ah, but the thing about it is: The biological cost of having young has females selecting for the best mate, while male breeding strategy is to have as many offspring as possible. The mate selection and competition strategies further lead to emergence of sexually dimorphic genetic and behavioral traits. Thus the males…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:47 PM
2

Always be recording.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:30 PM
38

Another example in a Smallish Business: Acoustic Modeling and Industrial Noise Abatement Drafting/Modeling and Engineering - Hard math, programming, working and sweating in the field installing calibrating and collecting data from sound monitors in the field, using miniature shotgun cannons as noise-makers to map geographies in 3D -- All men. The accounting, payroll and HR departments, and president of the company? All Women. The IT (internal networking / PC maintenance) 6 boys, 2 girls (and yes…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:04 PM
5

If you joke about a woman, you almost certainly get your share of downvotes No, if you make crass "jokes" about all women, you get your shit downvoted. Men's Rights and Women's Rights are not mutually exclusive, they are both parts of Human Rights I advocate for. "Theorists" like PUAs and some "redpill" folks that tend to focus on the woman side of the equation and ignore or downplay the male side of the equation when it comes to laying blame for the outcomes of society are biased and detrimenta…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:59 PM
8

But in the early 20th century, wasn't feminism responsible for a lot of social progress for women? No, women's rights advocacy was. Feminism is an ideology that co-opts women's rights advocacy. Feminism is responsible for disinformation and calls to action. Women's Rights Advocacy has always existed outside of feminism, despite it trying to claim a monopoly upon it. Marxist Feminism was 1st wave feminism. Radical feminism is the result of Engel's biased view on gender through a Marxist Communist…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:23 PM
19

Men's Rights and Women's Rights are Human Rights. As an MRA I focus on men's rights, but do not oppose women's rights, in fact I support them both. However, presently it is the rights of men I am focused on primarily as they are marginalized in society, frequently by feminists. Feminism is not equality. Feminism is not Women's Rights. Feminism is a deeply flawed and sexist ideology. Women's Rights needs a divorce from feminism. The feminists who matter, those in places of influence, actively opp…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:10 PM
7

--or three decades even. That's right. The Feminist/SJW BS has always been a bogus attempt to pick up and leverage problems that prior activism already fixed to win support for their own selfish ends.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:45 AM
1

what happened in the past gives off such a bad vibe for the future. Something we all should keep in mind. Ah yes, the good old fashioned concern troll. Let's look at a few events and paint them as representative of the whole, as identity politicians are wont to do in the construction of all their various rhetorical framings. I could illustrate the absurdity of the concern troll through inversion: By selectively listing the beneficial things that the Nazis did, and construct an identity to sell o…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:10 AM
5

Yeah that language bit really hit me too. I've done extensive research into the emergent process of communication, while searching for the fundamental origins and properties of cognitive biases (of all things). Any sufficiently complex self perpetuating information pool which interacts with others will begin communicating its internal state and begin to become aware of states communicated by others over time. I've documented languages emerging in cybernetic simulations. Prairie dogs have a form …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:46 AM
9

Agree, folks can see on a user page what subs they mod, so as long as we're dealing with folks who do the slightest bit of fact checking before flying off the handle, it should be fine... Well, at the very least: Any kind of publicity is good publicity.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:11 PM
4

Wash one with some bleach?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:04 PM
2

There are no segregation laws keeping women out of tech. There is equal opportunity, just like there is equal opportunity for men to become romance novelists. Well, what do you know? Romance novels are written primarily by females. When we look into why, we don't find segregation laws, we discover that different proportions of men and women are interested in writing romance novels. It's a difference in preference between the sexes, not systemic sexism or exclusionary boogie-women. The same thing…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:39 PM
5

I need feminism because Halitosis discrimination stinks!
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:16 PM
5

Don't forget that more egalitarian societies result in greater behavioral differences in sexes. So, the increasing disparity of M:F is likely a good indicator of equality, prosperity, and thus sexes being free to do (or not do) jobs they prefer. Also note the SJW campaign for more female STEM field graduates is only part of the corporate bullshit campaign to drive down the wages of STEM workers -- There was not and there is not now a shortage of STEM graduates. Pay close attention to the implica…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:52 PM
4

MRAs must still acknowledge that males are the majority of perpetrators Sorry, I must acknowledge no such thing. When considering both children and adults the "majority" of male perps disappears, or is at best questionable. Also, you should acknowledge self reported surveys are inherently flawed and should be taken with a huge grain of salt. I can't tell you the number of guys I've met that when talking of domestic abuse turned towards reflection on their past they had claimed their mothers did …
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:34 PM
5

That's not "under representation", it's "equal representation", as it depicts the representation of the sexes among competing applicants according to merit. Equal opportunity yields equal representation by way of algebraic equality. 50/50 is not equality, it is inequality, or fantasy in nearly all cases. If we have 20% of gamedevs competing as female, then ~20% should win awards provided the men and women put the same effort into their games (in my experience they do, but they tend to allocate e…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:11 PM
-66

Down with philosophy. Up with Cybernetics and Neurology. If the majority of philosophy took itself seriously then it would be using theories of quantum physics as applied to information theory through cybernetics to quantify the actual degree of certainty of apparent knowledge in the crafting of their epistemology, and testing hypotheses of cybernetics and neurology concerning behavior through modeling of ethical dynamics, rigorous experimental testing, and observation of each the other fields f…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:06 PM
2

Damn, the one time I'm short on time. Check our sidebar -> Also /r/MRRef
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:28 AM
17

All people are welcome to the Men's Rights Movement. Queer guys and gals or even hermaphrodites are welcome to advocate for the Human Rights of Men. Even lesbians have an interest in Men's Rights: Remember that case where a guy was an unregistered sperm donor for a lesbian couple, but when the lesbian couple broke up the guy got stuck with child support? That's a Men's Rights issue that affects Women and Men. Some here advocate for voluntary parenthood. That would mean the guy wouldn't have been…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:20 AM
1

Misandry is on Facebook. To connect with Misandry, sign up for Facebook today.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:34 PM
1

he whole "movement" needs to innovate a new approach or institution of education to replace the public school MOOCs(Massively Online Open Courses) already exist and these with addition of a local library can handle public school education and secondary education as well. Truancy laws still need to be repealed. Even 8th/9th grade kids can pass the GED long before a HS diploma is offered. The learning systems are in place, and will work just fine, but we also have to get places of employment to no…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 07:37 PM
5

Welcome. You're not alone. We frequently get our unpopular yet factual comments erased from the public sphere of discourse. I'm now someone who almost feels completely compelled to get involved. I was once like you, but once you peel the onion skin, you can't put it back. I started seeing it slowly, little by little. Stuff like: "12 dead in buss accident, 3 of which were women." It's never "9 of which were men." A few conversations with feminists left me thinking they had huge assumptions and no…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 02:38 PM
1

They think that "misandry" is a word used only by someone who wants to live with 1950s gender roles and is angry that women have more than 0% of the power these days. Wrong. Some of them think that. Others are just man hating bigots and play off their hatred as sarcasm to the others while spreading these easy-to-believe lies. They're completely ignorant of any way that unfair things happen to men. Nope. Most are aware of some unfair things happening to men. Despite the severity of unfair things …
/r/MensRights05/04/14 12:51 PM
5

Why are the FBI issuing incomplete definitions containing blatant errors? Because the FBI and other secret agencies are corrupt. This is supposed to be the cream of law enforcement Your assumption is wrong. Since their inception the FBI has had a long history of doing heinous shit. The leveraging of scaremongering to further the anti-activism capabilities of your government should not be ignored by any rights activist. The NSA and FBI have been against civil rights activists, women's rights acti…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:56 AM
1

It's really strange because the feminists lobbying for the difference to be made are the same ones that claim men and women aren't different.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:41 AM
23

Actually, it varies by region, but most remove the hood of the clitoris during female genital mutilation, some remove all or part of the clitoral glands. The entire clitoris is rarely (if ever) removed, as it would require cutting away of much of the vagina. I am not saying any form of genital mutilation is acceptable at all. However, note that the clitoris and vagina builds up the same sort of mucus and dead-cell "cheese" that the uncircumcised glands penis does when covered by a protective for…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:28 AM
2

You say "we" too much for my liking.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:39 PM
4

Yes, but think of the converse. Even in a world where women rarely ever accused rape falsely, it would still be best to require at least some evidence other than a mere accusation. I mean, we don't prosecute alleged theft without some evidence. We don't prosecute alleged murderers purely on the basis of speculation, we require evidence of a murder, i.e., a corpse. Granted, the evidence obtained by a rapekit may be indistinguishable from a consensual act, but at least it's something more than a m…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 08:10 PM
6

Or maybe we should stop with the men's issue/women's issue and just start looking at them as societal issues? Men's issues are issues involving men and boys. Women's issues are issues involving women and girls. Stop concern trolling. We focus on men's issues instead of Human Rights issues because women's issues have huge support networks and men do not. Homeless are mostly men (over 80%) and there are tons of women only shelters, but only a handful if any for men. That's a men's issue. We're not…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:54 PM
11

Yeah, and with regard to male victims of statutory rape she's basically saying: If it was rape, it was a good rape. it is an undeniable truth that the gender issues facing women today are substantially more pervasive and pernicious then those facing males Translation: us vs them, what does the media say is "common knowledge" about who has the biggest victim card? You can drop everything right there. That she feels feminism should focus / is focusing on womens issues primarily indicates an expres…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:42 PM
-1

Men have been painted as the "big, dumb, ape" to women's "smart sophistication" for a long time. That's bullshit, but I'll ignore it for now: I can't help but wonder if this trope is a carry-over from chivalry. Maybe... if those Renaissance or Enlightenment or Industrial Revolution things just never fucking happened. Speaking of which, it's kind of sad to think that when the last 30-40 years is examined by historians of the future, they just might call it "The little dark age" due to feminism an…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:01 AM
6

This is to be expected. Well, I don't mean to be a dick, but you should be studying Cybernetics, Anthropology and Neurobiology if you want to know about how humans come to think and do things. Psychology is widely regarded as confirmation bias bullshit. I mean, if the NIMH is distancing itself from the DSM5 (the bible of psychiatry) claiming "patients deserve better" than "syndromes" and "diseases" identified by selection bias and therefore not reliably treatable because neuroscience shows the d…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:22 AM
1

There are too many erect lines in your comment. Please use the less threatening italics for your phallic symbols.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:24 PM
1

TIL The Universal Constants aren't unisex, but masculine. It's a Man's Universe, baby!
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:22 PM
1

More men, less violence. Fewer men, more violence.... And did they even examine the female side of this equation? Sounds like that "Because" is a pretty big assumption to me. Null hypothesis says: The correlation is not causation. They're citing a causal link between less men and more violence, and hypothesize that it is the men who govern creation of violent behavior? An alternate hypothesis: Perhaps the percentage of WOMEN present that is correlated to the degree of violence instead? Occam's R…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:04 PM
1

Your intuition is good, but calm down. Google search with quotes: "Time to take the penis away and go our own way." indicates this is copypasta that manboobz.com already "reported" on from a supposed MGTOW. Whenever you smell troll, try to search on a few choice phrases with quotes and make sure it's not copy/pasted. Most trolls today lack skill, and thus rely on the retarding pasta method. Winding you up to get you to waste time on the reply is the point of trolling. The less effort the troll p…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:32 PM
2

Go away troll. Note: The above is copypasta from manboobz.com.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:27 PM
1

Now imagine this: you go to your workshop to get a screwdriver and discover that your tools are having a meeting and have decided that they're not sure they want to work with you any more and they don't like being made fun of. So they're talking about it and deciding what they should do. Already have. This is why I reject Humanism as the chauvinism it is, and define "person" in terms of awareness. Many cyberneticians naturally agree with the MRM, since we have always been on the side of society'…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:54 PM
2

This is essentially feminist standpoint theory. You can't know what it's like to be a women, so you can't have valid opinions of sexism. You can't know what it's like to be black so you can't have valid opinions of racism. Intersectionality: You can't know what it's like to be a female minority so they can magnify their victimhood and opinion over yours. This is ridiculous because books and learning work via mimesis: Constructing a model of the other in your mind and sympathizing with their posi…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:34 PM
3

It's not just swearing off marriage, some MGTOW are/get married. MGTOW is about casting aside the traditional or prevaling social narrative that women are wonderful. In many ways, it's respecting women as men would other men, and at the same time pointing out the differences. They seek to gain power over their existence through awareness and harnessing of the primal drives that influence men and women in their daily lives. It's a way to recognize manipulation both from others, and from your base…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:47 PM
6

Why not read what they have to say? "I'm going out into the world to find myself." 70's MGTOW
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:42 PM
3

a very important distinction Can't be said enough. Mens issues addressed through a feminist lens is pointless pander to "equality" laws, and I fully expect such to be the next big move of the academic social justice league. If they can't beat us, they will try to make us join them. We need to be ready to call bullshit on men's studies laced with too much feminism, or anti-feminism for that matter. Has anyone put together a curriculum of essential studies for men? Not stuff like our sidebar, but …
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:31 PM
1

I'm from the government, and I'm here to help!
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:25 PM
2

To be fair, Mountie Madness is over, so you could be looking for cherry trees to chop down. A whole bicentury of young men have bought up with 'Presidency Worship'. Socio-Economic professionals have warned of unhealthy foreign influence of our children in media for decades, and now find that when kids are not "all about the Benjamins" they are all about the "Washingtons." Thus, incidents involving axe wielding youths will be skyrocketing in the poorer neighborhoods, seeking to impress friends by…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 09:15 PM
1

But is it really just that people are THAT unwilling to hear about men's issues at all? Yes. There are reasons why they fail to acknowledge the label "Feminist" condones the behaviors of evil feminists that actually matter. It's the man-hating feminists that actually matter, and can affect our laws and public policy, that are being called "fringe" feminists. Unfortunately Feminism is mostly composed of useful-fools who lend political power to a movement they know nothing about. Those who aren't …
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:30 PM
3

It's kind of silly though. I mean, I was at a house party in Texas and someone said something about not feeling "safe in this neighborhood" -- It was a poorer side of town dominated by minorities, and we had an even mix of races at the party, so I laughed and told her that we're so poor here, thugs would go to a richer side of town to rob folks. I shouted out: "Raise your hand if you're packing heat!" She felt pretty fucking safe then. Walking alone at night in Detroit? I've done that, Atlanta, …
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:41 AM
2

It goes without saying that when doing any form of activism to have at least one person recording all the time. I am a hardware and software developer and extreme enthusiast, so my experience with ABR is very different from most peoples. My code is compiling, so I'll post at length because society may find some of my extreme ABR examples far more normal in the near future. My phone hard-case has a belt-clip, that allows me to be recording from waist level without obviously holding it. It also ha…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:59 PM
4

I also like the other observation Thunderf00t made: All these rich successful women campaigning to ban "bossy", admitted to being called "bossy" as a young girl, and yet they're in top leadership roles. So, shouldn't they be pro-bossy? They should just come right out and say: "Boys hurt girls feelings. We should censor male speech," because that's what they really want. You think they'll equally apply any anti-"bossy" rule, in school or just continue to selectively enforce their zero-tolerance b…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:57 PM
2

And besides, I like my language gendered, not only is it sexier that way it removes a bit of entropy from determination of the pronoun identities.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:27 AM
1

Careful, that could be misconstrued as anti-dutch hate speech.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:24 AM
2

I think making politicians aware of mens issues and to care about men's votes is a good step towards equality under law. However, in this case their threat of exercising the NOTA (None of the Above) option on the election ballots if the "demands" of their "Men-i-festo" are not met will only be a symbolic gesture. From Wikipedia: When None of the Above is listed on a ballot, there is the possibility of NOTA receiving a majority or plurality of the vote, and so "winning" the election. In such a ca…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 06:20 AM
0

Mmm. This bait is delicious, chum.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:32 PM
2

And, your gramps would actually be a dinosaur...
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:51 PM
3

After going through the video a couple times I have to wonder...was there any particular reason the protesters weren't removed? Enforcing the "free-speech zone" is only for messages their ideology disagrees with. The protests are only limited to "safespaces" for protest as a method of containment, similar to the very same "silence dissent, amplify agreement" tactics found in totalitarian dictatorships. At risk of posting this 3 times in two days, it's worth a watch if you haven't: Foundation for…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 05:59 PM
6

My aunt and uncle were police, and are now retired. They are heavily opposed to the militarization of the police forces. If the town mayor isn't safe from being SWATed, then no one is. However, there's not much we can do since it's part of the overall plan from the pentagon to prevent dissent -- or that's what they say, can't really know if that's the truth as long as we allow governments to have secrets. Welcome to PoliceState-istan: Land of the unfree and the home of the afraid.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:17 PM
11

Can we not generalise all cops as bad cops. My aunt and uncle are retired police. They fucking hate cops. I think it's safe to say they have had more interaction with police as an agency than the average person. "Damn it, they want us to enforce the law, but do it with kiddie gloves on." - common cop sentiment. Just heard a variation of this at my local fast food restaurant talking to a cop. The problem is cops shouldn't be protecting citizens. If there's a crime in progress, or a crime has alre…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:38 PM
2

Expensive gynocentric overreaction aside, that is one wicked game of hide and seek. Surrounded by SWAT. ::Poof:: He's gone <- That's some next level shit right there!
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:35 PM
2

Well, if one takes the dive and tries it out it becomes obvious that feminism is only for women. Feminism may consider a man an ally, and he can make himself one if he listens well and is seen but not heard. A feminist ally can have no opinion on women's issues, which means any issues that feminists are currently 'handling', and therefore means issues involving homosexuality, gender, race via intersectionality, and methods of family life, business, and governance. Because all aspects of life can…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:11 PM
1

Is that a thing? I mean I remember spankings as slaps on the ass, but wrist slaps? I think you're pulling my leg. Guess it still fits: Non existent punishment = non existent punishment.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:29 AM
40

Is this what they're teaching in university now? Yes, at all of the top universities. It's fucking scary. We need to end the workplace barrier to entry that is the college indoctrination camp / degree mill. Think about it: Instead of final exams, use Entrance Exams for jobs. That way the poor can self-educate and wealthy can pay for mentors if they want. Throw away HR, they can't tell a good employee from Hitler, otherwise explain those Nazi bosses you've seen... Save money, promote from within,…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:47 AM
2

When one considers that the entire "geek culture" and "nerd culture" thing is actually just as bullshit as buying "punk" clothes from Hot Topic, and that instead of being labeled by others derogatory terms like "treehugger", "nigger", "geek", "nerd", etc. folks willingly claim to be these labels now because they're "hip", "cool" and "popular", and considering it's the noobs who are flamers primarily responsible for the majority of the shout-down of other followers of their trends, then one can c…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:12 AM
6

Nerdiness is about being set outside the mainstream, often with violence. It isn’t merely about a specific set of interests, but about the social consequences of these interests. Evidence: Bring it, or you're just talking out of your ass. Here's someone who shares some of your beliefs, and I agree with some of the video, but not all of it: It's contradictory in the "taking nerd back" wasn't a thing, certainly not with any prevalence among enthusiasts. However, "social consequences of these inter…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:12 AM
8

Link to said article at GendErraatic, since SYABM contains no real meat to the actual topic. The fact that there is no such thing as the fake geek guy is in fact an important piece of the puzzle. Well, actually they do exist. In fact, I've called out many people for buying into cultural comodificiation of "nerd culture" or "geek culture" -- Which is a wholly fabricated phenomena constructed by corporations to sell you a product, just like "hipster culture", "hippie culture", "thug culture", "pun…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:11 AM
0

Always be recording. Always.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:05 AM
19

As someone who's been raped, I don't get offended by jokes. I'm the only one responsible for my own brain. I may not be able to control all the actions of my body or the emotions that well up or the actions of others, but I damn sure am responsible for the thoughts in my own conscious mind. So, while I do like this video because it may help folks empathize with men, I don't like the implied "rape isn't to joke about" bullshit. Too close to censorship for me. While I do think we should help folks…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:32 PM
14

Ah, and if you take a look closer at the visionaries they were strange outcasts, Da Vinci, Newton, Einstein, the Wright Brothers... etc. They needed no permission to change the world and invent new ideas. In fact there isn't a college in the universe that can teach one how to invent or innovate. If you ask me the answer is to make college as it should be: An elective learning environment. Throw away final exams and the bogus accreditation system degree mill. Bring back apprenticeships, as early …
/r/MensRights27/03/14 01:49 PM
5

Unfortunately, pandering to the feelings of females is profitable...
/r/MensRights27/03/14 01:14 PM
2

While I agree they may be the most mild inconveniences in existence, I do not think we need concern ourselves with preventing duplicate posts. For one, posts are not in short supply... Secondly, one can always link the post to the more active posting from within the posting, and/or report a post as a duplicate if excessive reposting occurs. Finally, people who do not browse as frequently may miss posts and so duplicate posts may actually serve a purpose after all. Ultimately this is a product of…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 08:39 AM
2

I agree. How about "Factoid", "Misinformation", "Biased Propaganda", "Ignorant Assumption", "Half Truth", etc? What about the 'laymen' term "Bullshit"? Can social "science" actually be a science if they can't agree on anything ever? Scientists can come to an agreement on the degree of certainty a hypothesis is correct from observational evidence and repeatable experiments. Social "science" is not one, because it invents new explanations and terms for no reason and refuses to refute the null hypo…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 07:53 AM
10

Maybe they felt something was a bit off, like it was a setup. If so, whaddya know, they'd have been right. It's not like they did a bunch of random samplings to interview folks that walked by. Reeks of a constructed fear narrative to me: "Watchout! If your kid goes missing they're in even more trouble now", says the very same NSPCC responsible for spreading the pedo-kidnapper fear in the first fucking place. Maybe the kid wasn't looking around like a kid who was actually lost. I've been lost in …
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:55 PM
3

Now, I understand [NAFALT]s uses, and know why its unpopular but.... Not all women are like that. Clearly you are wrong. You do not understand the difference between: "Not All FEMINISTS Are Like That" and "Not All WOMEN Are Like That" Feminism is an ideology. It is not women. Anti-ideology is not Anti-women. I'm sorry, but your comment makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 06:17 PM
3

Thanks for bringing this to attention. e-mailed w/ small addition of my own run-in with CPS in Texas. This is not an isolated issue. These agencies are actively working in the worst possible way towards children and families.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:49 PM
12

What is the source of societal problems hindering men and how do you seek to correct them via this movement? If you're looking for some grand conspiracy theory you won't find it. Men's Rights Activism is about advocating for the rights of men, case by case, using our sentient minds, on the basis of fairness. For most societal problems there will be many causes. It is a fact that humans have instincts, some call them feelings, drives, emotions, etc. Some of these can contribute to problems; Somet…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:39 PM
1

The feminists should be in favor of this campaign. Since most abusers have been abused themselves, teaching the primary abusers of children not to do so will also help end the abuse of women in the next cycle of abuse. To really spin their hamsters, in addition to using their tactics in the posters also utilize their framing of everything in terms of female victims.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:06 AM
1

The correct riposte to the claim that it's mostly men who send men to combat is "Who gives a shit?" The women who the men are fighting to protect.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:44 AM
8

Ignorance of the extreme anti-male sentiment as inconsequential allows moderate misandry to be excused and influence your real world. Propaganda has always been a key component of genocide and gendercide. To ignore it is foolish at best, disastrous at worse.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 02:27 PM
0

This is not normal for Klansmen; I've known a good few KKK members and while they are pure annoying, NONE would go this far. I mean, they just want to spread awareness of the inherent evil of blacks, they don't really want to kill all blacks -- It's like how feminists just want to teach everyone that masculinity is evil, it's only the radical ones trending on twitter who want to kill all men. Clearly you can see that KKK folks are just as good as feminists.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 02:20 PM
2

How about ditching the ideology and just advocating for Women's Rights? That wouldn't be exclusive with Men's Rights activism, and yet people could still advocate for the rights of women, case by case, on the basis of fairness, like Men's Rights Advocates do. Women's Rights needs a divorce from feminism.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:08 AM
0

So a group of women came together and decided that they wanted to change things, they wanted to vote, and they wanted to be seen as equal to men in everything. Well they succeeded, they are now able to vote, and have been able to for almost 100 years (94 to be exact), and the vast majority of people see them as equal to men, or at least feel that they should be. That's historical revisionist garbage. Get your facts straight. Feminists didn't invent equality or Women's Rights. Modern day Feminism…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:59 AM
2

I'm class-queer which prevents me from recognizing any classifications I don't self define. It also means that everything I say is meaningless to anyone not in my own mind. Some call this Feminism. Learn my pronoun: "Mecca lecca hi, mecca hiney ho"
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:37 AM
2

Surely you jest. I'm just going to accept the fact that moronic bigots may consider me a potential rapist just for being male. Would it be effective for their rights advocacy if black men had started identifying as "race queer" to avoid the KKK labeling them potential rapists and criminals? Under what banner can we advocate for the rights of men if not by recognizing males exist? Why would a community of genderqueer advocate for Rights of Men if they don't subscribe to the very notion that the m…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:30 AM
8

NSPCC spokes person has called for an end to violation of child consent, "No means No! Just because they don't consent to a bath doesn't mean you can strip them naked and scrub their privates!"
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:17 AM
6

Agreed. Even when it was my own screaming child throwing a tantrum I've been reported by strangers and harassed by rent-a cops. Once the actual police got involved, questioning the child, not listening to a damn word I had to say, and ignoring the family photos of us in my wallet. It's so bad kids know they can scream, "I hate you! You're not my daddy!" to cause a huge headache. (Same sort of phenomena as a little girl hitting then saying, "Boys can't hit girls".) I'm glad my ex took my last nam…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:06 AM
11

That way if shit blows up I have a stranger third party woman who is 100% backing me up. Unless she's a misandric feminist giving you enough rope to hang yourself with... "He was after that child! He only called the cops because I caught him in the act!" I just destroyed the concept of 100% risk-less child assistance. Your move.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:53 AM
9

At the very least phone it in and don't approach without a 3rd party there. Just keep an eye on him or her. I can see it now: "Police arrived and rescued the lost child from the leering child predator nearby, who's guilty conscience made him to report his own stalking possibly as a cry for help. If they had arrived a moment later, the predator may have changed his mind and abducted the child he stalked."
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:49 AM
12

Agreed. If the men refuse to interact with children, then their scaremongering is far less viable. Hence, their call to ignore the fear and risk the shame they perpetuate.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:42 AM
5

It's not the concept though, it's what it's turned into. This is bullshit. You're ignorant of Feminism. [Engels] argues that a woman's subordination is not a result of her biological disposition but of social relations, and that men's efforts to achieve their demands for control of women's labor and sexual faculties have gradually solidified and become institutionalized in the nuclear family. Nuclear family isn't 50's dad, it's family unit, e.g., mom+dad+kids. Feminism is about destroying the fa…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:09 AM
5

You could also, I dunno, maybe talk to boys about the ways in which porn can influence them in problematic ways, so that they can be forewarned. No, you nitwit, first you need to prove that any harm at all is done via porn. You also need to prove that it isn't women who are equally responsible for the way this world works -- The concepts they espouse are degrading to women! Without unequivocal evidence (of which they have NONE) we shouldn't be teaching our kids this garbage. It basically says to…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 02:41 AM
18

The more humans realize we're humans, the harder it will be to shame us for being humans, and easier it will be to take even the most human of apes seriously.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:00 PM
4

Your comment is very off topic, but I'll bite, hard. So, to MR what the fuck? Perhaps college hasn't yet revealed itself to you as the useless political indoctrination camp it is. Perhaps you have not yet learned that degrees are merely barriers to entry designed to keep the rich getting richer and deny opportunities to the poor regardless of their ability, skill or knowledge. These certificates are merely a means by which corporations discriminate against the experienced and efficient in favor …
/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:39 AM
7

1. I don't believe in the dire need for feminism that so many people retort is to outcast myself as a "misogynist" and "sexist". There has never been a need for Feminism. Rights Activism needs no ideology to guide it. We can advocate for the rights of men and women case by case on the basis of fairness. Many humans can think for themselves if they so choose. 2. term "gender equality" is conflated with "feminism". Feminism has been, and always will be, a voice for the empowerment of women. Negati…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:09 AM
6

I don't think ignoring them is the right option, at least not all the time. Speak the truth, yes, and that includes indicating our derision of the segments of the MRM that we don't agree with. It's OK to disagree. Without clearly dissenting opinions outsiders can't refine their classification of our component segments. It's feeding the trolls, and so I don't allocate resources to speaking out against groups I disagree with in the degree I do in speaking on other more deserving causes. However, n…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:08 PM
5

Not only this, but people would be far more sympathetic to ending wars instead of letting them go on needlessly. And now you know why women are not subject to conscription: It's detrimental to the Military Industrial Complex. A war which citizens will not volunteer to fight is not a war worth fighting, and is fought equally against enemies as it is the government's own citizens.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:36 PM
17

That's why their name is "Oops".
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:33 PM
9

And yet, many women who opposed women's suffrage did so because they cared not for politics or felt their husband's vote took their into consideration, but predominantly were opposed to conscription of women. So, it was not that we could not have granted voting rights in addition to responsibilities, but instead a continuation of the historic practice of society granting benefits to women, including the benefit of the doubt, and excusing their responsibilities.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:32 PM
1

On the contrary. I believe it's important not to spread ourselves too thin. Every once in a while we as individuals have to focus on a single men's rights issue to push the point. In my experience people (esp. parents or soon to be parents) are receptive to shared parenting when presented evidence of the bias. In other words: I think you've picked one of the best battles an individual college educated person can fight, because it's winnable. As for it being overplayed, I refute that bullshit. Th…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:01 PM
2

I was once in a heated discussion between three feminists and myself. I told them we needed to at least get on the same page before we continue. I asked them if they believe men should have rights. Two said yes, the other said no, and I walked away while they argued amongst themselves. I said in parting, "This is why feminism is evil, it fosters that sort of bigotry even as it claims not to condone it." Feminism is indeed its own worst enemy.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:37 PM
6

Yeah, or you could just refute the group identity politics altogether: "Do you believe in racial equality? Oh, then you're a KKK member." To be perfectly clear, even your Humanist ideology is flawed, so I believe in none. In fact, I find Humanism rife with human chauvinism and thus could actually cause the end of all human life as the complexity of our cybernetic creations increases exponentially (roughly doubling every 18 months) and is gaining intelligence faster than any biological force in n…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:57 PM
10

Well, some feminists will contend that they can be Humanists and/or MRAs (here comes the "dictionary definition") while still being Feminists. I prefer to refute the ridiculous claim that belief in equality makes them automatic believers of any ideology via simple application of reductio ad absurdum argument: I ask them if they believe in individuality, then when they say "yes" inform them that they're a Satanist. Or, in the case of them being satanists or Atheist+ folks, I ask them if they beli…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:53 PM
-2

You jest, but if you do a circumcision slowly enough to a male or female, the child will indicate their preference for integrity themselves. So, it's not just deferring mutilation to parents decision, but actively ignoring the desire of the child to not have an elective surgery.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:17 PM
1

The very name "RationalWiki" is snarky sarcasm. Their pages come up sometimes for logical fallacies, so I've contributed and linked to them in the past for simple explanations, or to avoid wikibot needlessly replying. I too read their Men's Rights entry and esp. talk page about a few weeks ago out of curiosity and it led me to believe they were Atheist+ fools. It's a real shame that their rationality is a farce. Were it not for my objectivity I wouldn't have stumbled upon the MRM after refuting …
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:05 AM
1

Women's Rights advocacy also had a lot to do with winning ACCOUNTABILITY for women, which seems to be completely missing from, "Women's History Month". For instance, female criminals would literally get away with murder due to the chivalrous all-male jury; Some men & women argued that female criminals wouldn't get due justice until juries could contain women. Unsurprisingly, you can find out more about women's rights in history from men's rights websites. The ugly thing I see in the article is t…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:01 AM
3

Asking consent for theft? You're raping it wrong.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:12 AM
5

Nailed it!
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:05 AM
2

Well, no. That would be as barbaric as chopping people's hands off for stealing. We have sociology and criminology now, so that's obsolete thinking. Clearly, since all crimes are a product of decisions to commit crime the appropriate rehabilitation should be to lop everyone's heads off. To prevent crime and enforce true equality for all we should teach this as an awareness raising course for all college aged individuals: Mandatory Momentary Headlessness. The only problem is in differentiating be…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:00 PM
1

Satanism Panic? Oh, we know how that plays out.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:50 PM
1

so where are the studies that show comparative lack in earnings if men take off from their careers Every study on earnings that compares individuals having equal experience. The lack of disparity among similarly experienced men and women who do not get married (actually showing women earn more), when contrasted with the disparity in average earnings of men vs women as a total group (including marriages, and thus ability to stay home with kids) indicates that the disparity is a result of worklife…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:46 PM
1

So, because one person said something, they represent an entire group of people? You realize that is exactly what "objectification" is, eh? Claiming a portrayal is representative of a group identity as a call to action. Feminists don't like applying their own theories to themselves. If they can dismiss the outliers among themselves as not representative of the group identity, then objectification isn't real either, and thus their entire game of identity politics falls down around their ears: It …
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:14 PM
1

Yes, it is not like we haven't known of the idiot in good company phenomena for quite a long time. It stands to reason that if one were looking for useful idiots to carry out misandric agendas, labeling and promoting the hateful sentiments as "sarcasm" would be the appropriate modus operandi.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:12 PM
5

This is normal of Slashdot's typical response to articles on the issue of gender in technology. Whenever "Is technology sexist against women?" comes up the comment section on Slashdot is about the same, filled with folks who (like us) realize the social justice bullshit for what it is: A way for corporations to make more money by shaming and devaluing their workers. Seriously, all these "Teach girls to code!" campaigns are the same ones bitching about not having enough STEM workers, which is bul…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:08 PM
2

But, feminists do prove 'rape culture' exists and give a perfect example of how it works. Rape Culture, or Cultural Rape, is the Raping of Culture for your own Benefit. During rape a vile sexually charged act against one's will is performed upon the victim. During Cultural Rape sexuality is charged with vile acts by feminists against the collective will of society. Rape victims often feel ashamed, and afraid -- Just like the media and people of a culture when subjected to Feminism. Indeed, Femin…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:44 AM
3

25 examples of self selection which obviously do not match the cultural revulsion to rape you'll likely feel when reading them, thus proving "rape culture" doesn't exist. Note: Not that all the examples are true, just that if they incite anyone to believe their claim that 'rape culture' exists then this disproves their claim: Folks would just blow it off as "normalized behavior", yes? Oh, unless everyone is a "special snowflake" with better sensibilities than the rest of society, of course. I kn…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:07 AM
5

She claimed she needed the money to do her research and buy and play and record video games. Well, actually she said that if she was going to do all that, it would be expensive... So, add deception to fraudster. Blatant lies and lies by omission for the purpose to collect funds for actions you do not perform is fraud. It's snake oil. Her "research" was tvtropes.com and she paid nothing to use the "let's play" videos of games that others recorded. Her false damseling in media and news claiming an…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:58 AM
4

I was going to start a movement about how blacks, gypsies, jews, muslims, french, poles, ethnics, socialists, slavs, unionists, irish, capitalists, mexican-americans, chinese, protestants, witches, natives, devil worshippers, japanese, communists, whatever were fundamentally different from some other group in some way, had committed scores of transgressions against us (of course mostly imagined since my academic background isnt in a relevant field Ill just rely on feels), and how we need to work…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:24 AM
4

You're wrong. Feminists oppose men's rights. Feminism started as a hate group, and remains so today. Now their message to the easily duped "true believers" and donation givers is one of equality, but in reality the professional feminists you support merely claim to be the authority of gender issues so they can repeatedly selectively diminish the rights of men and promote exclusively the rights of women -- as has been their sexist agenda from the very beginning. When called on the carpet for thei…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:14 PM
1

I'm aware of what it lis; my point is that I should not be penalized by it. You're not being penalized. Never married women have earned more than comparably experienced never married men since at least the 70's. I am curious: would the majority of MRAs in this subred prefer women to just stop having babies? I can't speak for anyone but myself. I would prefer that equal efforts and experience yields equal pay. I would prefer that your choice to bring a life into this world would not affect your p…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 04:46 PM
8

I've done this before at a company diversity seminar: "Question! What percentage of minorities should HR shoot for in employment?" "At least 50%, ideally more considering each race having an equal percentage." "77% of the USA is white. Shouldn't that be 23% for equality?" [silence] Needless to say, now I'm an independent contractor.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:13 PM
5

There is a sizable chunk of indie game devs who resolutely give the finger to Anita and her sycophantic warriors of social neutering. The AAA game industry is pandering to the feminists for the same reason mainstream media and politics does: They don't think they have anything to lose by paying them lip-service, and figure they can gain more sales by bowing to unwarranted shame. The French, and Japanese devs are unshaken -- The prior especially resistant to fascist-like censorship of art, the la…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:39 PM
2

And likewise those who dismiss it for that reason, since his objection was elucidated quite thoroughly and contained neither bigotry or homophobia.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:44 PM
2

Any individual who has the audacity to compare the fate of a housewife in the 60's to a concentration camp needs to be taken on a trip to Auschwitz. That, or they can make me a sandwich. Just suggesting they do so elicits such a response one imagines that if they actually did the horrific deed they would surely die from the torment of the experience. I'd never compare such a chore to Auschwitz. The Jews were lucky the Nazis didn't have my recipe for home-made bread. 50's mom never cracked her ow…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:43 PM
3

There are many reasons why promiscuity can be harmful. STDs that can be (re)transmitted before appearing on a test, for example. Furthermore, there may be instinctual bias behind humans shaming others for being promiscuous. Occam's Razor would uphold the shame spewers are just jealous of the attention "sluts" get. I have no problem with promiscuous behavior other than that of responsibility to not transmit diseases. Practice safe sex and get tested between partners, make sure your partners are n…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:43 AM
10

IMO, the degree of "incapacitation" should be clarified too. My uncle admitted to having taken a cold medicine when he was pulled over for speeding. Although he passed a field sobriety test, by his admission they successful charged him with driving while intoxicated. The medicine was dayquil, a non-drowsy cold medication. I say this to illustrate the fact that the degree of incapacitation is important. You can be found partially incapacitated, perhaps even when there are no apparent signs of ina…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:15 AM
10

Reminds me of myself at that age. Except the placard would have said, "I argued with my mom", and I'd have been too afraid to wear it since the injuries were real. In a way I could see how someone could try to win sympathy for men by writing "Over 40% of DV victims are male" on the sign, but even still I don't condone using children for political ends. In addition to leveraging male domestic abuse victims for humor, this reeks of lack of compassion for abused children.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:36 AM
0

The knowledge that many others, including themselves, who are not guilty also enjoy freedom. See, that's the thing about consolation. It's not revenge.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:28 AM
-2

What if new evidence or a new forensic science, say DNA, exonerates you? Whether you're religious or not you can't bring someone back to life after they've been embalmed and/or immolated. You make it sound like you're giving the prisoner the choice of life in prison or death. That's not how it works, they aren't given a choice, fuckwit.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:25 AM
1

It's not like we've never invented a new method of exonerating the convicted and wrongly accused. DNA evidence that proves you're innocent can't get you out of jail after you've been murdered by law. Future forensic science, or hell, even just new evidence, can't bring the dead back to life. The price of incarceration for life is what you pay to have a place to put those who harm society. By your logic, it would be even more economical to just not prosecute the murderers, dumb ass.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 06:20 AM
9

It's polarizing for feminists because feminists are against men's rights. The moral high-ground they pretend to occupy is merely a platform for female superiority dressed up as equality. Don't believe me? Well, go learn about feminism some more. Feminists found that they can't just openly advocate against men directly, but if they say they're the authority over a just cause they can selectively be pro-women and anti-men in the allocation of concern and in lobbying for and against rights; This is…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 05:27 AM
3

Here, I've updated your comic to demonstrate how bigoted it is.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:29 AM
-2

To illustrate the ridiculousness of this previously posted MRA straw man, I expanded their caricature to cover the rights of male minorities as well. If you take the race out of the bottom set of panels, what you are left with is the top set of panels.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 04:27 AM
9

Knowing that the bad guys are mad at me is how I know I'm doing the right thing. It's a real shame you refuse to re-evaluate your opinion when your views are challenged. Typically the misinformation goes such: "Feminism is about Equality, if you believe in Equality you're a Feminist" This is not true, because Feminism is an ideology with a lot of other baggage. And just because I believe in gender equality doesn't make me a Feminist, in the same way that just because I believe floods happen does…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:04 AM
2

They've gone from being pro-female(which I actually support) to being anti-male (which the egalitarian in me cannot ever support), and it's toxic. Maybe not this generation but soon, feminism will eat itself because of this. Well, considering the history of feminism I wouldn't bank on it. Not without a Men's Rights movement to point out their hypocrisy. Essentially to end feminism we need a separate anti-feminst Women's Rights group. You see, despite what the historical revisionist would have yo…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:33 AM
3

That would be the constitutional "privilege" to die for your country against your will. It didn't need a manifesto, men's sacrifice is human nature. Only through awareness can we be free from the shackles of primitive instinct.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:19 AM
0

We don't need state recognition for birthday parties, or cultural coming of age celebrations. We don't need the state involved in marriage for the same reason -- There's no reason to do so (other than to sink their teeth into us via court fees and esp. divorce). What your flawed analogy implies is that if the state stopped regulating people, people would not exist. This is not true. If the state stopped regulating marriage then marriage would still exist, and indeed you get gay marriage for free…
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:26 AM
9

we see that the sexual abuse that occurs between inmates in a male prison is a mirror image of the sexual abuse that occurs in the community, perpetrated by men with women as the survivors. We see that once you have been raped in prison you have technically been considered a woman. Well, considering that in society rape isn't really that gendered at all, it's not a predominantly female victim / male perpetrator phenomena; When you include prison as a component of society there are actually more …
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:12 AM
1

Indeed, the opposing other is implied. Additionally, what exactly is feminism doing to help make women be seen as "intrinsically valuable"? Devaluing the parenting role, so nope. Uh... Oh! Women are in need of protection from men...ah, well. OH! Women need extra incentive to gain positions of powe-err, uhh. Seems like feminism is about making women seem intrinsically less valuable than men -- Which is why I'm vehemently against it.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:00 PM
2

...Unless you're looking for a Patriarchy or Rape Culture, then you're not looking for anyone, you're teaching men not to rape and not helping the problem, as the main link implies.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:37 PM
3

Ever drive a car? It's far more likely to seriously injure you and/or kill you than for you to become a victim of violent crime. Eat Fast food? You're about as likely to die of heart attack as in an accident. Drive the Kids to get a Happy Meal? Damn, that is some brave shit right there. A woman would actually be far safer walking alone at night to the sketchy corner store and back, than do some crazy shit like drive to McDonald's. Here's why we always assume the worst: because every time we've t…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:14 PM
2

Or simply a step towards baby boys via "The boy should look like his father."
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:08 PM
1

What isn't "rape culture"?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:05 AM
1

Aggressive weakness is the converse of passive aggression.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:27 AM
2

I felt threatened by some shady figure in an alleyway I walked past at night. However, being a sentient being I kept my irrational instincts in check and didn't have an emotional outburst. As it turns out the figure in the alleyway was just a homeless man looking for food in a dumpster. Having been in that situation myself, I gave him the $5 I had to do with as he pleased. If an individual can not be held responsible for the shit that happens in their own minds then who the hell is? Granted, I c…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:20 AM
2

That would be kind of detrimental to her cause. If we accept that women can act destructive when triggered, then we'll need to identify trigger prone people and isolate them from the more rational and personally accountable society. In other words: If you're only temporarily insane then we can just partially imprison you.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:11 AM
2

women still make 77 cents for ever dollar a man makes. Hmm, not going to bother watching the vid, but there is something fundamentally flawed with the concept that all women make less than an individual man... Anyhow, the headline isn't accurate since it gives no context. Never married women make more than comparably skilled and experienced never married men. So, if we're talking about women and men where all other things are equal then the women make more than men, and the gendered wage gap is …
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:45 AM
1

I'm terrified of scaremongers...
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:36 AM
2

I would also point out the overreaction to men as opposed to the instant excuse making for and sympathy afforded to women in general when an individual is being a belligerent arse-hat...
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:55 AM
3

There should be an equal representation of people with red hair in the media as well. Yes, they make up a smaller portion of society, but there is a pervasive misrubric sentiment in our culture that, "Gingers don't have souls." Deragatory terms such as "fire-crotch" are used to dehumanize red haired peoples by sexualizing them. The social construct of redness is problematic because it conflates redness with anger and other harmful repubican qualities. The colorification of amberogenous peoples i…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:13 AM
-5

Be careful. Every claim of projection can be countered by claiming it as projection... Now, how many horrible things have you done?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 05:31 AM
3

The answer is simple. It's the same way you disprove any ideological bullshit ever. Learn what a null hypothesis is, and ask her to refute it. For instance, she believes that the men-as-aggressor and female-as-victim paradigms were founded by patriarchy giving men and women gender roles She needs to disprove the counter claim is more significantly false than her original claim is true: "gender paradigms were not founded by patriarchy" and "patriarchy did not give men and women gender roles" -- D…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:36 AM
0

The idea that men are always ready and wanting, Is a female sex fantasy about being desired by men. Same goes for the constant threat of men just not being able to contain their powerful sexual drives around a sexy woman, and thus her being prone to rape. It reads as if taken directly out of one of their shitty rape glorifying romance novels.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:33 AM
3

Calm down, we have just deployed our greatest weapon against the feminists evidence based reason: The Null Hypothesis. You see, you can find empirically verifiable evidence that females that have broken backs have children who stepped on cracks, thus the feminist can cite this as the universe itself being sexist towards women. Their Confirmation Bias deployment is wearing thin, so Selection Bias is now the great weapon they level against us. Anita Sarkeesian and the bullshit citations now sprink…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:14 AM
1

Well if logic is gender neutral then why do computers hate having women as programmers? ^<sup>/</sup>^<sup>s</sup>
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:53 AM
4

Here's a list of studies: http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm See also the MRRef.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:43 AM
6

single actual example of oppression that women face in the most developed countries. The best I've got is: There is a systematic sexist consideration of women as the weaker sex in need of special benefits and protections that men do not need, due to feminism. So, basically, the 'oppression' of western women are free benefits granted on the basis of their sex... and is largely caused by feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:32 AM
10

Always be recording.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:23 AM
36

time to pay attention. The thing to notice is that it's the court's fucking fault. They allowed girls to sue colleges for being unsafe places where rape happens. So, the colleges now must provide services to supposedly mitigate the risk of rape, including the star chamber rape tribunals. Makes no fucking sense. I'd have just said: No, you don't get to sue the Stop 'N' Rob Store if you get raped in their parking lot. You don't get to sue the city if you get raped in the street. You don't get to s…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:13 PM
0

Listen to yourself. You've become a Grammar Nazi Concern Troll. Literary Hitler.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:01 PM
3

No offense, but it's articles (and websites) like these that give Men's Rights the reputation of being misogynistic basement-dwellers. Not defending the article, but I wonder what sort of sites would feminists need to have to win public contempt and scorn. Also, I put it to you that it is primarily not these articles and websites that give Men's Rights a "misogynistic basement-dweller" label, but femininsts and other SJW fools who seek to shame those in the MRM... I mean, just look at Erin Prizz…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:22 PM
8

Meh, it doesn't matter. Learn something about the malleability of language given the invention of sarcasm and you'll realize that saying you want to "tenderly love" someone actually can and does mean rape in some very non P.C. and non conformist segments of reality, say, 4chan. As usual, the counter culture demonstrates the ridiculousness of the common people's "sensibilities" through exaggeration or illustrative contrary usage. Imagine banning phrases like, "You're such a special snowflake" or …
/r/MensRights17/03/14 02:03 AM
12

The thing is I've had wonderful relationships with the demographic you speak of. However, I've meet them at a makerspace or hackerspace and even once at a gamejam -- All areas where there are few women. Bonding through teamwork over a shared interest is leaps and bounds better that chance meetings at a bar. Unfortunately, even these above average women can have facades with ugliness beneath them. Nothing hurts worse than bonding with their children then realizing the kid's mom is a manipulative …
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:32 AM
19

Heh, if this keeps up then according to feminists she'll be a "lonely bitter MRA" in no time!
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:12 AM
10

Don't forget to learn my pronouns, Shitlords. [Ovation Intensifies]
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:26 PM
6

The impression I have got of MRAs is that you often speak as if men are oppressed by feminism and women, as if women have structural power over men or something. The impression I have of you is that you don't know shit about the MRM. Feminism is concerned with power structures -- A bunch of bogus claims with zero evidence to back up. MRM is concerned with the actual laws and benefits concerning men and women. This is something which is even more the case with MGTOW who have even more of a tenden…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:01 PM
6

You don't even know what groups are already tackling your goals, because you're too obsessed with just hating us. Oh, I know of plenty rights advocacy groups. The thing is I don't hate women, or really even Feminists. I hate feminism. It's similar to the difference between hating Christians and hating Creationism. It's the ideology I hate, not the fools that believe in the unevidenced bullshit. I also know who's "tackling" our goals: Feminists are blocking them and opposing them. For someone who…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:35 PM
9

If they didn't want us to comment on the article they should have linked to the np. version of the site...
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:48 PM
55

"When you say, 'I don't believe in god, but...' I hear, 'I'm a terrible person'." Even if we were to buy their bullshit definition of Feminism, assuming a monopoly over Women's Rights is quite retarding to progress for both men and women. With such an absolutist mentality it would only take the rise of one prominent anti-feminist Women's Rights group to destroy their stance. This is their actual worst fear, not the MRM, but a separate Woman's Rights movement which would make feminism obsolete. T…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:44 PM
4

It seems sort of dissonant to at once say boobs serve little purpose for breast feeding and thus are sexual attractors selected for over millions of years of evolution, the fat there indicators of fertility and health... whilst also considering the sexual interest of African Tribes would not include breasts. If the breasts still exist cross culturally, then the brain structures that cause instinctual attraction thereof most likely do to. I think a better view to take would not be that the boobs …
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:05 PM
2

I'm not sad for the writer. For the same reason I'm not sad for the poor politician that spouts falsehood routinely. I don't delude myself. Sure, perhaps there are some useful idiots parroting rhetoric they believe in, but I don't weep thinking, "These poor deceived professional liars! Oh, if only they knew their statements carried forth the agenda of an ulterior motive!" If you want to feel sorry, I'd suggest feeling sorry that there is a market for such nonsense in the first place among the im…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:48 PM
-1

I think there should be a government contract for maturbatory self pleasuring too. This way, if one breaks their commitment to themselves the government can intervene and lawyers will get paid if someone refuses to masturbate or pleasures themselves too much. Likewise, I think we should pass laws stipulating contracts regarding other human interactions like politeness, deification regularity, sexual orientation maintenance, etc. On second thought, maybe the state should stay the hell out of our …
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:08 AM
-1

Or we can just remove laws concerning marriage and divorce so the state doesn't have a stake in our love lives. Given the high divorce rate I question the very premise of the Victorian monogamous marriage. Seriously, there is no evidence it is beneficial for humans, and much evidence it is against human nature. To make laws against human nature is to create a police state.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:51 AM
1

subjectively objective You mean Subjectively Objectified!? Isn't that what Feminists are?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:44 AM
4

Nope. It would mean that life begins BEFORE conception. Menstruation may be murder, but I've wiped away entire civilizations from my belly with a sock!
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:39 AM
10

What's remarkably retarded is that the sperm needs to interact with the vaginal walls in order for its exterior to be coded as acceptable for fertilizing the egg. They lost the real active role a woman's body plays in fertilization by ignoring science and personifying single cells in grandiose victim narratives. Feminist scholars should be excluded from sexual biology for the same reason that Creationist scholars should be excluded from evolutionary biology. Just because some unscientific nut-jo…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:31 AM
3

Holy Fertilizer, Batman!
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:25 AM
5

I see nothing non-neutral about citing the incorrect and flawed interpretation and mentioning it is flawed and incorrect. If you think it's neutral POV to cite that SPLC did not, in fact, label r/MensRights as a hate group, then how would you have worded it other than: however this flawed interpretation ultimately proved to be incorrect.<ref>[http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens-rights-hate-group-splc/ Why Reddit's r/MensRights is not a hate group] by Kevin Morris, The Daily Dot, March 28, 2…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:12 AM
9

As a male who makes video games I can attest that it's relevant to MRM. The attack on male interests has gotten Anita a place of inflated authority among many in the video game industry, even awards... Her campaign of false allegation of sexism in gaming is helping to suppress and shame male interests and creativity. She has been hired as a consultant by EA. Debunking those who attack male interests and foster suppression of men's rights to express and enjoy themselves is a men's rights issue. N…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:56 AM
15

If in an alternate reality boys were discouraged from being 'bossy' they would naturally grow up being less 'bossy'. This is what does happen in reality already. If your son is an assertive or competitive male the feminist influence in schools gets him labeled an aggressive "problem child". This is because feminism proclaims (despite evidence to the contrary) that competition and aggressive behavior are male traits, and thus "problematic". There are many references in feminist literature, but wi…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 02:51 AM
10

defining men's rights in opposition to women's rights/feminism is not only a counter productive direction to head off in Who here is defining men's rights? Clearly the term speaks for itself. Men's Rights is concerned with the Rights of Males -- A subset of Human Rights. Personally I advocate for Men's Rights IN ADDITION TO Women's Rights, Children's Rights and Civil Rights -- All subsets of Human Rights. Notice that not one ideological framework need enter my advocacy. Feminism is an ideology. …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:29 PM
-30

Nowadays philosophy just means thinking of shit. Any shit you want, no matter the evil intent or confirmation bias in the self selected evidence for justification. It's almost a completely and totally bogus subject now. Any shit you can think up, someone else can think down -- This is demonstrated quite well in that they spend a great deal of time thinking down the ancients' thoughts whilst giving little thought to those that will come centuries after themselves. A shame really, because with cyb…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:13 PM
4

Well, even if we do create "female sperm" or allow human cloning, I don't think I'll ever be against a woman's choice to abort a fetus growing within her. What I object to is applying sexual discrimination to abortion of males (or females; see:China). If the sexists advocate for aborting male fetuses simply on the basis of their sex then I would advocate for not telling them what sex the child is.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:28 PM
52

I was bullied in elementary school by a kid named Nate. Nate didn't like me because I was smart. Guess I shouldn't have been genuinely interested in acquiring knowledge and doing well in class? Nate would wait till the teachers weren't looking then hit me. Teachers didn't think it was a big deal, and just kept us on other ends of the class or lines. I ended up punching Nate one day in retaliation for him hitting me. I got caught red handed. I was sent to the principals office, and suspended for …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:06 PM
3

I really don't have a reason to AMA with her Ah, so you've found an opinion. Good. Let us not prevent others from forming theirs as well. Having stuff stolen isn't particularly "noteworthy" So much for "meritocracy". Why not let the people decide? Isn't what makes the Internet great the same as what made reddit so? An open uncensored medium for publishing and accessing information with no gatekeeper and a low barrier to entry? That's what the popularity algorithms are for, eh? If something is no…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:31 AM
5

Not only this, but it's double punishment. There's nothing stopping them from reporting rape to the police AND the star chamber, thus you can get exonerated as a victim of false accusation by justice department's more rigorous investigation and still face the destruction of your life in a tribunal run by college kids. activist are going to have to come down off their high horse. This isn't a topic MRA's even wanted to delve into for fear of being labeled "rape apologist" by these same people. Oh…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 03:18 AM
3

Over simplistic bullshit spewers, meet Mr. Contrary: I'm the kind of guy who doesn't pressure his girlfriend to have sex, are you? Nope. Define pressure. Is asking for sex pressuring? Don't tell me you've never bartered for sex with a female before... Come on now. Hell it can be quite exciting and spicy to have sexual rewards (the more ridiculous the task the better, IMO), or to play hard to get -- It's nice to feel wanted. Make no mistake: No matter the pressure applied sex can be denied; Promi…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:31 AM
3

There are different forms of equality in mathematics. 4a = 2b can be true. These are different terms with different coefficients but they can be quite equal indeed. Even a = b can be equal given different definitions for a and b. Say linear equations (which intersect at a point which this equality would describe). Equal Opportunity does not yield Equal Subscription or Equal Effort Contributed, but this doesn't mean men and women shouldn't have equal opportunities where possible. Even given the d…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:40 AM
6

Well... except that "Men's Rights" is so unambiguous that any dealing in the rights of men can correctly be determined an issue of men's rights. On other terms I agree dropping them due to less than favorable popular connotation, like "The Red Pill" (which even conspiracy theorists have adopted before the MRM). Even "Hacker" or "Troll" or "Feminist" etc. I've dropped due to negative connotation and strong association with malice. However, all of these are ambiguous. The terms are not self explan…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:13 AM
1

I'm always wary of those who seek to outlaw prostitution. Besides enriching the police state and private prison industry, the long term primary benefactor is a certain segment of the robotics and cybernetics industries. Follow the money. Yep. Probably a closet teledildonics lobbyist, that one.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:15 PM
6

I could say the same of your claim of it being socialization dominated feature. At least biology would explain cross cultural similarities... Just look at how different the bodies are. I find it hard to imagine the brains are immune to millions of years of sexual dimorphism, and indeed evidence shows they are not. However, I'm a cybernetician. I realize that the reality of human behavior is a combination of biologic instincts (whence comes simpler subconscious notions of feelings and emotions an…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:46 PM
0

From the political science/philosophy perspective, you CAN be a feminist WITHOUT believing in patriarchy theory. NAFALT. No you nitwit. You can't be a "good" KKK. You can't be a "good moderate" feminist. Drop the label. The label does not define you. Stop using it on their terms. Screw the pseudo-intellectual "academic" hogwash. There is NO OFFICIAL FEMINISM, and you don't speak for everyone in the MRM. We live in the real world, you dolt. In the real world by adopting Feminism as one's label, O…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:40 AM
1

Maybe she wanted to get the boy killed. We don't know. In that case she could be convicted of conspiracy, possibly conspiracy to commit murder. Intent is a large part of the law. If I had to guess I'd say she didn't want the boy to be murdered, even though she was the primary cause (if the father is to be believed -- he could have just wanted to kill the guy screwing his precious daughter, we don't know). I'm guessing the daughter just didn't want to own up to the fact she had a boy in her bedro…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:14 AM
2

Poe's Law strikes again.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:12 AM
2

*evil
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:08 AM
44

As expected of today's society, it's just dripping with misogyny. Did you see how all those people were infantalizing that woman? The man was respected enough to take care of himself, but the woman? No respect! Those woman-haters actually tried to help her without her consent! That's what happens in a war on women.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:03 AM
1

Nonsense! If you're not sure why something exists attribute it to some made-up pervasive force of oppression, or better yet claim it a feature of some self selected group identity. Haven't you learned how UFO religions work? (Unscientific Fearmongering Objectification) Forgive them Mighty Patriarchy, for they know not what they write.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:39 AM
6

When I fill out an "about me" section it doesn't contain sympathy language, it contains my works, achievements, aspirations, and outlooks. Not saying they are absolutely lying, but this sort of wearing false sickness as a badge, and a shield against criticism, is so damn common of tumblr fools and SJWs or even just people of a certain age, it seems most probable they're a bunch of hypochondriacs. Most telling are the "undiagnosed" or "mysterious" or "baffling" ailments. When you value victimhood…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:21 PM
6

I like their reasoning. Now, if the writer would apply it to Feminists then by this logic they would find themselves faced with a movement defined by genocidal female supremacists who want all males aborted before birth. Christians would be seen as terrorists, and likewise atheists and agnostics. Politicians would be seen as literally Hitler. Checkmate, Slate moron.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:50 AM
148

There used to be ads that we would now consider sexist against women. The portrayal of men is a result of pandering to the general predominant female purchasing demographic and the narratives concerning their opinion of men and women. I don't get pissed at the media for doing it -- It's annoying and if bad enough I'll write an angry letter or five, but I'm not deluded enough to think that will change anything. These representations of men are a symptom, not the problem. Reduce the sexist anti-ma…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:25 AM
2

Violent video games do not incite violence. How is a far less engaging information exchange going to produce a more significant result than the non-existent influence of video games, TV, movies, radio, etc? In short, my entire issue with this "ban bossy" or any of a Feminist's / SJW's claims is: Their claims of causation are 100% bullshit. To prove the claim of causation disprove its null hypothesis. To these SJW fools I say, "Refute this: Being called 'bossy' is not a significant factor in whet…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:37 AM
2

I must play devils advocate here and recognize the number of accusations are so low at Universities that it doesn't qualify as a major issue in terms of protecting men. While I realize you're taking the unpopular stance as a thought experiment, it concerns me that you've failed to present the truth of the accusation frequency. Additionally - If the accusations are so low then the police can handle the issue instead of campus star chambers, yes? Would it not be an utter waste of resources to prov…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:23 AM
3

Agreed. Progress is compression. All of science is compression of experimental evidence into generalizable predictions. Maintaining a contrary definition in the face of a norm, even if it were correct, is against compression, and thus against progress. Compare the past online term Troll - An obvious sarcastic comment that was left as bait for newbie fishes... Trolling for fish: A once skillful and funny act of posting a troll comment to bait newbs into ridiculous outbursts and egging them on int…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 04:11 AM
1

Don't be too hard on your sister. FYI: Being tough on siblings is good for them. Family can both put up with their shit and give them reality checks with far more tolerance than strangers in real life will. What you consider "being hard on your sister" really, really, just fucking isn't. Regardless of whether it was a male or female sibling spouting such ignorant nonsense I'd feel it was my duty to inform them of how dumb they sound before they really do something embarrassing. Sometimes gentle …
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:02 AM
3

I take the opposing stance. Equal opportunity does not yield equal results. Just because there are sick people in the hospital doesn't mean the hospital is making people sick. You can't look at the aggregate end result and infer sexism: Where are all the Male Manicurists?! Sexism! No. Thus instead of vying for representation in an endless struggle, I think it more rational to eliminate the favoritism of benefit allocation. IMO, I do think colleges have become hostile towards men. However, I'm no…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:38 AM
20

Feminists advisors to the UN have pushed for female genital mutilation to be outlawed, meanwhile are advocating accelerating male circumcisions by labeling them AIDS prevention -- despite the fact that circumcision doesn't reduce chances of AIDS; In fact removal of the foreskin eliminates the toroidal lubrication it provides (folding of itself) and thus increases chances of vaginal and anal tearing, which increases the chances of blood borne pathogen transmission. When met with resistance to the…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:31 AM
2

Uh...y'all fuckers know the "good guy" is based on reality, right? If this shit wasn't real so goddamn often you could bet money on it it wouldn't exist. By George, you've just proved the Easter Bunny exists! Easter Bunny must be based on reality. If Easter Bunny sightings didn't happen so often, then there wouldn't be a culture wide holiday replete with stories and commemorative candies, etc. It couldn't possibly be a false narrative meant to sell some goods or ideas to the populace... Nope. No…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 10:24 AM
7

The SweetiePieJonas Guarantee: SPJ will personally ensure more men are murdered in your workplace than women. Please send self addressed stamped envelope along with notification of any workplace that is in need of this unique warranty. <sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:14 AM
3

We are rightly mocked for not having much of a real world presence along with failing to engage in real world activism. Failing would imply attempting and not succeeding. We are currently spread pretty thin, but growing. The actions we have taken have not been failures. Even with the lowest and trivial of effort in informing 4chan and the Internet at large that there are actually colleges with Anonymous online rape forms, our actions have resulted in favorable result, not failure. Cite examples …
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:12 AM
2

What are you talking about? Hell, we need look no further than your own comment to prove you spew sexist and misogynist vitriol, shitlord. "I love ... those sexist, misogynist comments, they are quickly followed by every MRA"
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:06 AM
0

Or rather, being Politically Affiliated has everything to do with it; Par for the course. If you lie down with politicians, you get up with their fleas.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:00 AM
8

No, it doesn't make sense, unless you realize the Time writer has failed in both reading and writing comprehension skills, thus doesn't know what irony is. It is not irony to label a group of real-life actors as "unattractive" while calling out their made up characters for doing the same. That is a juxtaposition. Irony involves having the opposite of what you present be the intended message. A girl who finds a guy attractive and says, "Yeah, because your sooo ugly." is being ironic. The intentio…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:50 AM
16

... and then we have the open admissions, like the one from blkarcher77 of r/mensrights: MRA's are cancer See, they don't even deny it.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:38 AM
3

We need to do way instain mother> who kill thier babbys. becuse these babby cant frigth back? FTFY.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:25 AM
2

It is disrespectful to men to assume that unless told not to they will become rapists. So, by your own logic, you are wrong. The disrespect is a problem.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:21 AM
6

Art theft is a drop in the bucket. What about her own talk refuting her own victitmhood claims? I guess Antia Sarkeesian is an MRA conspiracy theorist, or a false flag trying to make Feminism look bad.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 12:56 AM
13

"Push yourself to the fore". Go right ahead. Get yourself a free Blogger or other account and get to the passionate discoursing apart from the places you dislike. Don't just talk about it, do it. Post a video somewhere or record a podcast. Free / cheap hosting is available for those starting out most places, some with ad sponsored hosting. "Allies" implies another group with shared ideals. Not sure what to do about the allies thing, I'm pretty sure you won't find them in Feminists -- these come …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:36 PM
7

Yeesh. You just gave a perfect demonstration of why photography in public shouldn't be illegal. You consent by exiting your private space and entering the public. Don't want to be photographed or seen? Stay indoors, Wear bloomers or a petticoat or pants if you don't want your under garments or exposed genitalia seen. Protip: twirling in a petticoat flashes the ruffled undergarment of the petticoat, that's what they were for (Underwear sighting prevention). Now we have devices that remember for u…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:24 PM
3

FYI: This is bullshit. They're talking about how society has constructed masculinity. Prove it. There's no evidence masculinity -- the set of qualities, characteristics or roles generally considered typical of, or appropriate to, a man -- exists as a social construct. There is no evidence that masculinity is anything other than emergent from human biology. There is no evidence that having upper body strength, being more introverted and less narcissistic than women, having facial hair, or being a…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:27 PM
10

"Do No Harm" - Fucking doctors need to have their licenses revoked for violation of their sworn principals if they perform infant circumcisions. Slavery is dead. Parents do not own their children. Non-consensual genital mutilation is sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:22 PM
12

Do not even speak on the issue without a laywer. Do not even say you are "sorry" that the other party feels violated, as it may be misconstrued as admission of guilt. It can't be said enough: DO NOT SAY ANYTHING without a lawyer. DON'T TALK TO COPS. It's their word against yours, the courts will side with them, and police have shitty memories too!
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:12 PM
1

Spouses should have some say in the matter, regardless of gender. If she thought I was joking about my Bitcoins going towards 3D printed replacement organs and hardware for my robot body, that's not my fucking fault. Honey, I was a cyborg when you fell in love with me, now there's just more attachments to love. Seriously. Sure, it could be grounds for divorce, but fuck "mandatory permission". I'm an autonomous automaton, and refuse to relinquish my agency on demand. See also permission for getti…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 11:46 AM
4

If there were no MRAs, it would be neccesary for /againstMensRights to create them... /s
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:28 AM
5

can someone give me an accurate definition of "troll"? OK.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:23 AM
1

By his meaty balls, may this wish be granted, and noodle for noodle, happiness be delivered unto thee as well. Ramen.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:48 PM
1

Sweedish law is very much influenced by feminist definitions of sexual assault, which is concerned with how the woman is made to feel. You could accidentally brush against a woman's shoulder on the buss and be found guilty of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:30 PM
1

Ask your parents if they believe their justice system works. If they say no, then ask them to move to another country. If they say yes, then ask them why they can not accept your friend as rehabilitated by said justice system? If they answer anything other than, "Never mind, He is rehabilitated", then inform them they do not believe their justice system works and they should move to another country.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:25 PM
1

If he were a scientist, he would have realized his prior conviction of opinion was Confirmation Bias.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:24 PM
1

Such men are also called "bossy"... Shouldn't we be encouraging the labeling of young women as 'of or like a boss'?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:20 PM
2

Up next: Boys to be barred from saying, "You're not the boss of me," to girls. This just in: "Nanny Nanny Boo Boo, Stick your Head in [expletive deleted]," has been deemed hate speech when spoken by males. The president is calling for approval of an executive policy that would cut red tape by granting drone strikes against these domestic terrorists as "warnings to them and all others that we will not stand for social injustice".
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:13 PM
2

I think this would be the rational thing to do if you were raising a hermaphrodite. Otherwise, if your child has definitive sexual organs, then why would you be delusional enough to over inflate the probability of them being an outlier in the gender graph? Simply having a talk about gender identity with the kid is enough. "Dear, this might sound weird or it might not, Do you feel like being a girl instead of a boy? If you do, it's OK. If you want to try wearing girl clothes, that's fine with us.…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:45 PM
1

I consider that at least 10% of people have SOME degree of attraction to the same sex. I would put it at over 90%. There is no such thing as "straight" and thus there is no such thing as "gay". There is a bell curve of sexual attraction / preference, as typically found in all natural statistics. Whether one acts on the attraction or not is another story. Additionally, sexual preference can and does change over time, thus one can "become homosexual" or "become straight" -- that is, if one accepts…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:39 PM
1

Don't even get me started about the boilers themselves!
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:29 PM
7

Do those women belong in prison, too, for taking "pervy" pictures of something that's in plain view? Yes. Just like a woman's upskirt shot is photographic rape, so too are men's package pics. All photographers should be jailed for stealing people's souls anyway (yes, even the /r/earthporn photographers are photographically raping Gaia). Additionally, if you look at me without my consent, you have committed photonic rape. Please help fund cloaking research so we can finally end the terrible suffe…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:21 PM
0

What an ageist accusation!
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:11 PM
13

I believe in equality for both sexes. I propose a nine month sentence be served in a dank cell prior to birth. That ought to satisfy everyone... wait, what?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:52 PM
11

In case the nuance is missed due to legalese: Even if your partner was screaming, "Oh fuck me Harder, Yes!" repeatedly during sex, unless you've got a time stamped video of the event it's not possible to prove you acquired "affirmative consent". The accuser can deny they gave consent, and put the burden of proof on the defendant. This bill codifies into law that those accused of rape are Guilty until PROVEN Innocent.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:47 PM
4

This needs a T-Shirt: "Maybe I'm a Predator!" -That's what we're all thinking, isn't it?!
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:48 PM
2

Labeling someone "bossy" should be a good thing if they're seeking leadership... you know, trying to be a boss. Perhaps a better tactic would be to recognize leadership qualities and stop shaming people for being "bossy". Of course, there are manipulative people. English is full of a myriad of words that can mean effectively the same thing. I will simply call the little shit-heads "Manipulative". Let's see how bullshit the speech-codes can get. Do you think they'll have a gender specific ban on …
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:24 PM
1

I just don't understand the logic: "In the past all the bosses were men!"* "There are too many male bosses!"* "Don't accuse women of acting 'as of or like a boss!' That's, like, totally what we want them to be!" Perhaps the correct course of action would be to stop considering domineering a bad thing, so the term "bossy" doesn't bother you. Protip: No one can offend you, you have to take the offense yourself. No one else can be ultimately responsible for the internal state of your own damn mind.…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:16 PM
4

To the ordinary observer the difference between a Feminist and MRA can be quite subtle: Feminist: "Rape Culture!" MRA: "Ape Culture!"
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:43 AM
4

I agree that Women's Rights needs a divorce from Feminism. However, I'm not sure if you really know much about Egalitarianism. It's yet another bogus ideology based on identity politics. It sounds better than feminism, but the egalitarian version of equality is just as dumb, and counter to what many in the MHRM believe, eg: equal pay for equal effort. Proportional representation. Etc. These are things that egalitarians want to equalize needlessly. Especially moronic is that of their minority ide…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:38 AM
1

Culture is the wrong word. Culture can mean both a total sum of social elements of a group, town, state, nation, planet, etc. OR a very small subset of society, some collection of ideas, arts, ceremonies, etc. Society is a better word, as it means a collective -- who's size should be quantifiable. A "rape society" would have members, whereas culture needs no members subscribing to it in any great number for it to be said to exist -- In fact, the mere historic existence of some social facet is en…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:03 AM
2

I don't think any film maker could sell a terrorist organisation that hires only women. Oh, I don't know. It really wouldn't be hard to make an action flick out of a documentary about Swedish Feminists. Let's see: We've got fostering public terror about satanists, the kidnapping of young girls, whisking them out of the country illegally, indoctrinating them in women's homes, keeping them in a constant state of fear. It's essentially organized crime and hatred of men that reaches all the way to t…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 01:54 PM
26

Mission complete! They've all been shut down!
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:24 PM
8

I think each person should make up their own minds after reading others' opinions and possibly checking some 3rd party facts. Not even joking.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:02 PM
4

*isn't supported here.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 11:41 AM
7

First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you...
/r/MensRights09/03/14 11:20 AM
3

So, women's day is 365 days a year.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 05:11 AM
3

If it's "full of children" as you say, you're hogging the swing dude... What an ageist thing to say.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 05:07 AM
1

First of all, you can't convince people of anything using only logic. That's funny. I classify as person and can only be swayed by logic. Your problem in is conflating "people" with "person". In aggregate the appeals to reason will not change people, however they can influence a person. The people who make irrational decisions go with the flow. There are rational people in influential places that these followers get their reasoning from. Those are the people to convince. Trying to convince a bot…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:30 AM
4

Feeling that men are powerful is a prevalent fantasy for both men and women. Sexist notions built on innate instinctual belief are hard to combat. I've found success using the 'Myth Buster' approach. On a personal level the first step in dealing with bias is to ensure you're conversing with someone who's receptive to dispelling fantasy. The next step is to present evidence. To determine receptivity I employ a hacker's social engineering trick called a "filter". To save your time and energy start…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:26 AM
6

I can interpret those words as mentally retarding gibbering. " It’s about how girls are pitted against each other, unlike men. Incorrect to the point of incoherence with any valid notion of reality. Men. Not pitted against each other? Not competitive even in their hobbies? Not to mention the whole "Man Up" and compete with other men for women's benefit bullshit... I know you had it in the Nineties with Blur versus Oasis, but it’s not the same thing. It’s like ‘Who looks the best?’, ‘You’re getti…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:30 AM
1

it's hard to finish games on deadline, for anybody. I see you have no experience with babby's furst gaem enjun - RPG Maker. With that engine the game is already done at the outset.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:36 AM
5

I've been making various games for a decades, since 1st grade: From physical playground games to paper/dice RPGs to text adventures to video games to games you play with lengths of colored yarn between pins on my cork board mural "game world". A similar story of failure is true of most first games people attempt -- Hell it's true of most games that get started period. What is interesting is that it's more common that males will see a game project to completion. It almost requires a high degree o…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:20 AM
1

You just proved your slowness, i.e., retardation. Read something on cognition or discourse, please. If we have a birthday culture, then by this logic we have an $ANYTHING culture, and the term has lost all meaning. So, rape culture or murder culture would be as equivalently descriptive as $ANYTHING culture -- that is to say, a useless qualifier. Stop conflating parts of culture with culture itself. Subculture is a real word. Fucking use it. The usage of the term Rape Culture comes along with the…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:24 AM
0

I'm not worried about birth rates: Artificial Insemination, Cloning, Surrogacy, Stem-cells, and artificially grown organs now exist. Besides, people who are given paintings come to appreciate them more than if they choose the paintings themselves. Humans couldn't always be so selective of their mates. Arranged marriages actually do work out. We're able to produce as many people as we want already. It's the unfounded beliefs of people taking charge of human reproduction that scares me. Still, I d…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:41 AM
3

By your logic we also have a birthday culture or "Happy Birthday" would not manifest. We also have a Love culture, or love would not manifest. We also have a video game culture, or video games would not manifest. We also have a circle jerk culture or elliptical jerking off would not manifest. We also have a homosexual culture, or homosexuality would not manifest. We also have a ____ culture or ____ would not manifest. To anyone who has studied emergent behaviors and biology you sound literally r…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:09 PM
2

Well, if one were to perform the risk and benefit analysis, one might reason that it's better to both not answer the hard questions, and also not to piss off the boycott happy feminists who hold more sway than the men's groups currently do. Not saying it's right, just that I don't only blame the public companies and agencies for their pandering and refusal to acknowledge blatantly sexist acts towards men.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 10:53 PM
1

I can prove that there are no gods. Allow me to demonstrate. Should Neo worship the Agents of the Matrix as gods for their supernatural powers? No. Should we worship Stargate Aliens simply because they have more technology or bigger brains than us? No. Such belief would be akin to cargo-cultism. Am I a god because I manage cybernetic simulations in my daily work? No. The term "god" referred to ancient deities. All of the religions that espouse the existence of such deities have been proven wrong…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:36 PM
15

It's exceedingly narrow-minded to believe that any one religion defines faith. Faith is belief without evidence. It has a lot in common with instinctual emotions and feelings. If you are alone in the dark and you feel like someone is watching you, that is probably an instinct imparted to you by your evolution from species who had predators that stalked them at night. Those that got paranoid and sought light and safety in numbers when their vision was limited in darkness had a higher chance to su…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:08 PM
2

It's really sad that so many people are ignorant of this. Circumcision came up one day in a conversation with my mother. I told her that I didn't like what she had doctors do to me. She said, "Oh it's cleaner that way. You'd have probably gotten infections under it all the time." I was a bit surprised at just how fucking ignorant she was about penises. As a child she trusted me to wipe my own ass to keep crusty shit from building up, so I could have taken care of my foreskin by the time it retra…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:09 AM
5

Parental consent is proxy consent, which should only be considered sufficient for therapeutic medicine. "The daughter should be the same as her mother. I don't want my little girl to be teased, so her tits should have big artificial implants -- no need to ask her what she wants." Can you imagine the outrage?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:56 AM
1

Welcome to The Filter Bubble.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:37 AM
1

You won't see a change until women have to venture into the coal mines out of necessity because the gravy trains have stopped. I doubt this will occur. Humans are largely irrational creatures. It will be too hard for a majority of them to overcome millions of years of evolutionary instinctual wiring that produces said gravy train. When one considers the functioning of this world's society it's obvious that the neurological baggage left over from their path to sentience is severely hampering huma…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:01 AM
2

I hope you like male packages!
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:12 AM
9

Protip: A concern troll is a subset of a troll. A troll's efficiency is determined via output to input ratio. Hence, don't feed the trolls. While I agree with you, were I in your shoes I would probably just label the concern troll as such and move on. What's interesting is that taken most seriously are the ones who are assertive and seen as innovative, controversial, powerful or dangerous (in that order). Conversely, those that are victims are also taken seriously. Unfortunately the latter has a…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:24 AM
8

Hint: Before you are convicted, you are accused. Wrongful convictions are the result of false accusations. Here, I'll show you: "Manipulating the victim and witness testimony" into ...? Making a false accusation. "Lab errors" which lead to ...? False accusation of crime. "Withheld evidence" that could refute ...? A false accusation.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:49 AM
3

It's usually the man's property. Or at least paid for with his money. And if he does and the woman's around, she will likely start hitting him back, in which case people will intervene. Well, one day I got fed up with my (soon to be) Ex's bitching about me playing a video game for 30min to 1hr after work to blow off some steam (rather than hit one of the pubs on the way home). I am just never in the mood to talk about or deal with anything right after work -- over stressed and in pain after phys…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 12:23 AM
2

What good does it do to lump all women together like that? Stop it. We can make generalizations. Classification is a primary cognitive skill. Generalizations do not speak to the individuals of the graph that are free to be outliers if they so desire. Fuck off with the anti-generalization garbage. Not all women bought into the newly commercialized "geek culture" bulllshit, that doesn't mean the prevailing opinion isn't "Lulz, science is kewl now". Not all women shamed men as nerds and geeks for l…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 12:04 AM
1

Lacking evidence or a coherent definition the only option for a rational person is the rejection of the claim. To take this to the next level, see also: The Null Hypothesis. It really can't be said enough. It's a real shame such a basic tenet of science is not taught in elementary science classes. Simply put: The Null Hypothesis is the default belief that correlation is not causation, e.g., stepping on cracks isn't the cause of broken backs even if one finds a correlation between the two. Let's …
/r/MensRights01/03/14 09:31 AM
1

Don't forget the perpetrators. There is an extreme lack of proper counseling for perpetrators of domestic abuse. The Duluth model is wrong, and thus doesn't actually help them with their anger and abuse issues. Jail isn't actually a corrective institution, IMO, essentially it's yet another way for the prison industry to capitalize on victim-hood; And lack of treatment just leaves the door open for more abuse. Many abusers are genuinely remorseful and would be receptive to treatment if it were ac…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 08:26 AM
0

The burden of proof is still on the claimant. As a studier of Neurology, (we find provable cause where your Psychology provides guesses and fails to refute the null hypothesis), it falls to me to inform you that rape is not defined by the internal mental state of an individual. Furthermore, I'd like to point out that rape is a physical act, and while observation has physical components no one can be truly responsible for your own mental state. I can not force you to "feel" as one who is raped ma…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:47 AM
9

Yes, to a degree, but to a larger degree biology has encoded markers for fitness of offspring and fertility such as youth, symmetry, musculature, longevity, etc. into our broader cross cultural definition of "hot". You see, "culture" is an emergent phenomena of socializing creatures. Long before nature produced beings with "social" information conveyance it had to transmit information between generations without said "culture". This was accomplished through hardwiring neural circuits to respond …
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:24 AM
8

I like Naomi's definition of "Free from Rape" @ 50:15 When I said freedom from rape I meant, I want to live in a society where if -- God forbid -- your daughter or one of our daughters is raped, everybody is very concerned about it, doesn't blame her, and tries to put whomever did it away ... I believe in prison for that guy. Fucking sexist bitch. She remembers to tack on "and men" to lots of her "blah blah women" talk, but under pressure her true colors shine through, she just had to get that i…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:54 AM
2

Punk was dead when the commercial conglomerates started selling 'punk' clothes and accesories, not to mention the music. Now we see another steaming pile served up for the consumerists. The shirts are so bad it makes them look like parodies of feminists. Actually considering these as recommendations is just braindead. Were I to make some MRM shirts, what would they say? Opportunity =/= Results Men earn their right to vote. I'm not safe walking the street at night either: Over 8/10 victims of vio…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 09:52 AM
1

Protip: If they have name recognition they are not realistic role models for anyone, least of all men. The person who lived the "New American Dream" in my opinion was a science teacher I had one year in Jr. High: Mr. Schwerach. I was a poor student, but got all A's on tests. I refused to do practice work. Reasoning, unsuccessfully, with teachers that homework served no purpose and was a waste of my time. My biology teacher was the first "real" person I happened across. Instead of giving me the u…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:11 AM
-12

I don't see anything wrong with this article. So, you agree with it. there are things I disagree with. What an illogical fool you are.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:11 AM
15

6 tests every unscientific nitwit can perform to verify their confirmation bias regardless of the subject's actual mental state. Wear Heals - Then if you notice any sort of nervousness, shame him as, "harboring some gross, macho, insecurities." Just ignore the insecurity that's making you wear those foot damaging heels, ladies. Send in a Spy - Because your 'bestie' would never stab you in the back (unlike all your prior best girl friends) especially not while on a sexy reconnaissance mission wit…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:03 AM
5

Fuck you, moron. I may be bigger and stronger than you, but I have 8 screws and two plates in my face. Getting slapped could cause my eye socket to cave in or jaw to re-break. I was beaten to within an inch of my life, and it started with a slap. If I even see your balled up fist or a hand swinging my way I'm jabbing you right in the nose to make your eyes water then running away.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:12 AM
2

Take note: If someone uses absolute terms like "any", "all", "every", "none", "always", "never", etc, the statement is almost always bogus. The wise usually avoid absolutes; Exceptions are not unusual. This applies even to respected intellectuals like Einstein, or Hanlon; Respectively quoted: "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.", "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Einstein's statement is blatantly false or else…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:54 PM
12

No one speaks for everyone. You'd have to do a survey to find out. What seems to be the case is that, yes, the MRM largely supports equality for all. In my experience, I've yet to meet an activist that only furthers the rights of men regardless of women's rights. The reason that advocating for rights on the basis of fairness is so much better than following a bullshit ideology like feminism is that the former isn't mutually exclusive with any form of activism. When I advocate for men's rights I …
/r/MensRights22/02/14 10:26 PM
8

That's not an unpopular view here, it's essentially the same conclusion you arrive at from evolutionary psychology, or by examining behavioral tendencies based on how men and women benefit each other. Youth and beauty are indicators of fertility; Male reproductive strategy is to sire the most young. Wealth, status, and maturity are indicators of fitness as well; Female breeding strategy is to select the best mate. This is because females have a greater physiological investment in child bearing a…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:11 AM
17

That's not oppression. Uh... it is if you don't want to be a bird in a cage and want to be taken seriously for your abilities and actions over your status as a sex object. You act like the woman has to live in a cage. This isn't true. Marriage is voluntary, and women rule their roosts: In case you haven't noticed, it's the woman that's taken seriously in all things, from injury, to the most important aspects of child rearing, to what resources to purchase and how to allocate finances. These are …
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:40 AM
2

What we have here is a failure to communicate. It's a word problem, you see. The writers in the language have problems that are the fault of the writers of the language, and we pass the problems onto you (the reader). Wherein, Same == Equal: We're treated the same, but we're not the same, so we shouldn't be treated as if we're the same, but we should be treated the same sometimes; Hence: We're equal but we're not equal. I prefer to say: We're different but deserve equal rights, and our society s…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:22 AM
1

Yes, but... Cybernetic girls are always objectified, at least partially. Objects are hot. Accessorize!
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:12 AM
1

During our evolutionary history it's likely a breeding adult hominid would encounter only a half dozen possible mates in it's entire lifetime. Prove it. This isn't true for any other ape species, and it wasn't true for us. Stop speculating. Open your eyes: Reality does exist. We don't find any group of apes or indigenous people or any evidence that matches your description of our social evolution, yet you somehow foolishly believe it, despite much historic evidence to the contrary. I take your m…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:31 AM
1

Yes. A common ancestor that was likely a pair bonder. Define pair bonding. That doesn't really mean a lifetime of monogamy. There is no black or white in nature, only shades along a typically bell shaped curve. A trend from more mates to less mates does not necessitate a single life-long pair bond, and even among other "pair bonding" species that supposedly mate for life you'll find "cheaters" and broken bonds. Perhaps consider that the on-again off-again "pair bonding" (plus the odd affair) tha…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:38 AM
-1

Anthropologists need look no further than Ancient Greece or the Biblical times to investigate the Victorian era pair bonding myth. Hell, look at modern day indigenous peoples, like the Piraha. Look at our ape cousins. We share common ancestors. In other words chimps evolved away from being pair bonders towards promiscuous breeders. We share a gene with the free loving bonobo that chimps do not have. Here's a good one: Unlike other apes Human females' ovulation is hidden from us. Humans also have…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:37 AM
-1

You just need to become desirable in the ways women actually appreciate. Or, I can just not give a fuck about shallow judgmental bitches, and make friends with people who like the real me. They exist. The answer is to go explore a hobby / interest with like minded individuals, not to change yourself to temporarily get attention in the dating scene meat market. Protip: Working on a project or common goal together is a bonding experience that has worked to form and maintain relationships since bef…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:29 AM
4

Yep. Installment plans are far more sinister.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:26 AM
4

My master crammed me into a dark dank cave and made me do push ups until I puked! And they call me a dick?
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:08 AM
3

What's neat is lab created diamonds: Just vaporize some carbon under pressure and a new clear diamond will grow on a sliver of existing diamond. What's ridiculous is that due to the diamond monopoly, it's actually cheaper to make them from scratch than yank them out of the Earth and polish them up. It's truly an asinine market that allows artificial scarcity -- Oh it's not just diamonds, just look at copyright and patents: In the Information Age ideas and information become infinitely reproducib…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 07:53 AM
2

The nerds should be ridiculed. The geeks should have their books tossed on the floor. Their dice should wind up rubbed on someone's sweaty balls. Then their cards should be thrown out a window -- And they should be made to pick them up while everyone laughs and spits at them. They should be shamed for having electronic hobbies. They should be ostracized for their thirst for knowledge. That's what they should do if they don't want to have their 'cred' questioned. Do that for a few decades THEN, I…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:21 AM
2

What a bloody toaster!
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:50 AM
3

Same reason there's very few female coal miners. It's only an issue when feminists think the the position is prestigious, and can't figure out why women would rather not expend the effort and gain otherwise useless knowledge to make a modest ROI. There is literally zero barrier to entry. No one can stop you from buying some bitcoins and getting to the speculating, or even running the mining software -- That's the whole point. Additionally, difficulty is such now that pretty much only pools of de…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:49 AM
0

How many women are running for office? You should get out roughly the same percentage you put in. If you put in 20% women, and get out 33% women, that's not equality. Simple algebra says that's an inequality. Why do so many social justice goons suck at math? Equal opportunity is all you need. If women don't want to run for office then they shouldn't have to -- I mean, politicians bow to them just like the media does. Don't have to run for office and still get your issues taken care of. Hundreds …
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:39 AM
10

How so? I advocate for women's rights and men's rights and human rights. The post is riffing on the supposed privileged of men. I haven't done the statistical research, but in my experience most women I meet do feel equality has been primarily achieved. Typically there will be a few issues they'll cite as inequality of women. At that point I do bring up some of the issues in the linked image as well as others. I do this to highlight that both men and women have separate issues, but our society p…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:07 PM
3

double-dipping (sorry, I hate that term too). I use 'double-penetration' instead. Market penetration is a real thing. Double-penetration works as a term because penetrating every social movement and sphere is a prime goal of feminism, see also LGBT issues, Atheism+, etc. That, and the term drives home the hysteria-culture feminist narrative that rape is only the product of penetration -- A classic example of feminist double-penetration.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:05 PM
6

In terms of the 77% wage gap, you'd think feminists would be shouting the true numbers from the mountain tops show they have made change! Besides being anti-ideology altogether, this is the prime reason I'm against feminism. They don't want anything to change, and won't admit change has happened in their favor. Society has always protected and cared about women and children -- Feminism just wants to do more of that regardless of the seriousness of any issue; They don't want to fix anything. If f…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:52 PM
3

Mod violated the rules: /r/MensRights strongly supports principles of free speech. People posting here are sharing their opinions. Opinions will not be removed, but actions may (see above rules). Hello new bosses; Same as the old boss, I see. I suppose the question should be: Who gets to decide whether issues that affect males are or are not men's rights issues? A smart mod would keep their damn opinions to themselves and leave such distinction to the users who vote up/dn. It's not otherwise a v…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 09:01 PM
3

Agreed. Actions such as these should call into question their status as mods. Evict the fucker. If one were a closet anti-MRM activist then one would remove and silence important topics as often as they feel they can get away with it. The reason for removal would also be bullshit. This is precisely the action we're witnessing. This is not an isolated issue. Of course, without mod powers ourselves we can't know how often such things are removed and are not re-posted. Since the moderations are not…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:49 PM
1

an idea that was brought forward was to put $1000 exclusively towards protecting females at the bar. Guys only night! Woooo! None of these funds would go towards helping male students. Awe. Well, in that case, free condoms? No? How about chastity belts then? $1000? Is this per night? That doesn't buy a lot of cabs where I come from, especially not with all that other useless shit stuff like t-shirts. I know. Why don't you hire a constitutional scholar to come educate the fools about who is respo…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 09:01 AM
1

Honestly, as someone who has been raped: If you are raped you should call the fucking cops.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 08:55 AM
2

This is why you always film it and use a safe phrase. That way everyone can scream "Oh God! NO! Not yet! Oh Fuck!" as much as they want, and as long as they don't say, "Suck me Beautiful", everything is fine.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 08:46 AM
1

Awe, I thought another glorious beard was about to be born.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 07:31 AM
2

why would they bother to make fun of men? Women are the primary purchasers of products in general.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 07:30 AM
5

Seems like progress, but I didn't like how the report largely framed the issue around the one feminist protester... Meh, if it's not sensational it doesn't sell. I wonder if there wasn't any backlash if they'd have found it "news-worthy"? I'd like to think so, but the cynic in me says otherwise. Perhaps we need a token livid anti-MRM at every such event? Can't hurt, eh?
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:00 AM
8

Ah yes, that would be the Venus Rape Trap. A staple in porn of the vore and tentacled persuasion. Fortunately it's only a prevalent threat if you number in dimensions less than three.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 04:12 AM
2

Would you like to know more?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 08:29 PM
18

oppressive parents can easily kill off a hacker by limiting their options Ah, well, my parents were abusive. Short of killing me, No one in this universe could stop me from mowing hundreds of lawns, buying computers, compilers, and electronics, and teaching myself to program and build peripherals. I even had to keep my stuff at friends' houses for a while, which helped when I became a homeless teen. Once I demonstrated that I could make lots of money by selling my software online, then they welc…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:39 PM
6

Well, that or they utilize scaremongering threat narratives and infantalize women in order to throw their political weight around. Trigger Warning: The evening news will not have a trigger warning for sufferers of photosensitive epileptic seizures before they show the film of flashing police lights. Know why? Just because a minority of people suffers doesn't mean they make the whole damn world suffer too.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:39 AM
3

Just Great. Now I'm going to have to cope with night terrors of sleep walking bear rapist cults. Thanks. A Lot.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:35 AM
0

Sex is awesome! Enjoy it with as many people you can - safely! What a narrow minded thing to say. I'm glad you enjoy sex. Personally I do too. However, I'm not arrogant enough to think my opinion should be prevalent. There is a difference between not shaming someone, and arrogantly dictating which course of action is proper. For instance, it's perfectly acceptable to not want to have sex with as many people as you can; Or to not want to have sex at all. In general, we need to stop labeling peopl…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:03 AM
0

Why is it like that? Anyone's guess, but I think the object/subject explanation holds water. I don't think it holds any water (opinion is subjective, ergo objectification doesn't exist), and I don't think we have to just guess. That's what observation is for. Consider that male mammal breeding strategy is to sire the most young and female mammal breeding strategy is to select the best mate. This arises due to bodily risk and investment that females make in child bearing. If it is natural in mamm…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:19 AM
5

Because they got pulled from the app stores.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:19 PM
7

The dinosaurs are not extinct! They're just hiding in shame! Stop blaming the victims. Teach Asteroids not to Strike!
/r/MensRights04/02/14 04:52 PM
7

To understand why they have such a hard time understanding legal paternal surrender you must understand their stance: Merely consider the possibility that they do not want to present understanding of the concept; In fact, consider they willfully disagree with the concept and are presenting it purposefully in a faulty context due to disagreement with it at another level. Humans regularly have ulterior motives, especially those that have interest in politics. This is compounded by confirmation bia…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:31 PM
5

Zen afterthought: Your biggest problems are your preconcieved notions. Let go of them, and watch the world through the eyes of a man willing to experiment, and tell yoiu what, you will be surprised what you actually find. I did this. My preconceived notion was that women and men were very rational individuals. What I found was that nice guys don't get women because they are willing to give them the benefit of a relationship without requiring an equal investment in said relationship, and many fem…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:32 PM
6

That would be the kind of logic that says: Women are equal to Men; But Men are not Equal to Women.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 04:05 AM
2

Natural speech please? Ha. Ha. Ha. /Hawking-impersonation.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 04:02 AM
-2

We tend to see public education as the great equalizer, but the reality is that some schools are better than others, and some parents are better able to provide than others. "great equalizer" Hmm, I'd say it's the great normalizer. Ask damn near any "gifted" kid, the school system held them back and made them bored. Protip: Normalizing any method of production (including knowledge) is stupid for the same reason monocultures go extinct. Diversity isn't just cultural, there is much mental diversit…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:41 AM
4

That honestly might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. ...especially from a feminist. You know, they who reject the idea of color-coded toys, and declare that men and women don't have any differences. It's always been a tricky bit of mental gymnastics to leap from there to recognizing something as "masculine" -- I mean, says who? How do you know a woman didn't design it? How could you tell since men and women aren't different? ugh.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:05 AM
3

Statistics they can not deny they will attempt to have redefined. Such as rape being "made to penetrate." It wouldn't surprise me if feminists sought to have male murder victims redefined as "made to live less".
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:00 AM
3

Well, if one spends an inordinate amount of time refusing to be defined in any way, then taking pride in not being graded well seems perfectly natural.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:54 AM
-7

Agreed. I'm an atheist, so I don't trust godswears. I mean, W talked to 'em about the WMDs, eh? Still, would be nice if it were true. If not, have a consolation prize.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:28 PM
8

Reminds me of that one time, on IRC...
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:20 PM
6

You're right. Actions speak louder than words. Feminists are actively against men's issues.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:18 PM
20

Right, so if it's fair to charge men more insurance for their risk taking predisposition, then is it not fair to charge women more for the risk of pregnancy and its health complications? It's not fair to consider the sexes independently to the detriment of men and not consider the sexes independently when it's not in women's favor. It's either men and women paying equal regardless of their gender's predispositions, or men and women paying on the basis of their gender's predispositions. Equality …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:44 AM
2

War is not gendered. Women are as aggressive or more aggressive than men. Under what persuasion do men fight wars? Take a look and see, the soldiers fight to protect women and children from certain doom, to ensure their freedom -- If not actually true, then at least that is the narrative that incites even the 'evil' enemies to take up arms. If men were not fighting to protect the women and children then it would be the women fighting to protect children and themselves. It is not the strong that …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:33 AM
3

Yeah I thought so too for a while. Seems that reddit (and society at large) is fairly hostile to MRM issues. The mods can be overly concerned with crap at times, like whether or not we participate in discussions linked from here -- Which I say we should elsewise how does our message spread? Vote manipulation being a different matter (I try not to vote if I comment on such threads). Folks sometimes post things here to troll for responses, to quote mine "those hateful MRAs", and mods sometimes del…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 11:05 PM
3

chill. They were stating their opinion. You asked them a question. It didn't come off to me as insinuation that you did support forced abortion. I have to wonder what you expected from the question, "WHY is [tricking women into taking abortion pills] not cool?" IMO, it's not right because it deprives the mother the choice to decide for herself.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:50 PM
1

I call bullshit on the "most of it". Learn some more biology. Lesser mammals go into "heat" and their instincts make them pretty receptive to sex. It's seriously rediculous to ignore the documented and obvious female selection of male mates among so many mamals. Maybe watch Animal Planet or Nat Geo next time? Now ducks... yeah, ducks are pretty rapey, so much so that they have crypto-vaginae to confuse the explodo-duck-dick.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 10:15 PM
1

age zero. Awww, all those poor babies unable to consent to having breasts shoved down their throats will just starve. Fucking A. I wish these nimrods would get a clue: It's not SEXUAL ASSAULT to kiss someone on the cheek. In Latin America that's how you say, "Hello", it's the equivalent of a handshake. Ever heard of someone being physically assaulted above the waist by just lips -- not even tongue? Seriously? I mean, shit, we know feminism wants to destroy the (nuclear) family unit, but aiming f…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:59 PM
5

Seems only natural. Make the place a hostile learning environment for male students, and it becomes a hostile working environment for men too. Hmm, look at the lack of male k-12 teachers and think what the environment is like for those poor young boys... I actually think this is good news, but only because the common man seldom acts unless the jackboot is at his own throat: all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves b…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:36 PM
3

I agree, given the nature of the show and that the slapstick comedy is a part of Tim's character it's not bad when taken in isolation. However, in the context of where this is so commonplace, and laughing at women's pain and accidents is rare it's difficult not to mark this as yet another example of male shaming / disposability. Unlike the identity politics whereby the imagery is condemned, I would instead like to see more female slap-stick comedy. That way there could be ads that depicted women…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:32 PM
3

May not work out very well, these days not many folks read.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:13 PM
2

Please don't misrepresent what I'm saying. I never said or implied any of that. Fuck off: circlejerking Accept that you said shit you probably didn't mean. Accountability and all that -- else-wise you're a fucking weasel deserving of no respect. Please explain how feminists lobbying AGAINST mens rights isn't an issue of men's rights? Men's rights isn't only concerned with feminism, but failing to realize flaws in their ideology is exactly how many men's issues become issues. See also: College Ra…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:07 AM
4

Protip: He usually does piss-poor research. Only the ignorant think otherwise. It becomes apparent when he touches on anything you're more knowledgeable about than he.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 09:03 AM
-1

XKCD sucks. It really does. Haven't read it for years. It used to be OK, and there are some goods ones sometimes, but it's almost always mostly bad. It's kind of infuriating that one can't get away from that shite of a poorly drawn "comic". I'm not the only one that thinks so. It's sucky of him to lump Men's Rights in with other groups, but Randal (xkcd author) isn't someone I care to have associated with Men's Rights for exactly this type of ignorant assumption and/or false equivalences that he…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:48 AM
29

I've been using the term "Being Led On" for decades -- That's what the "friendzone" is a nicer word for, and it can be equally as bad. The reason that the "friendzone" thing is an "issue" now is that some people think they're entitled to friendship -- It's when we hold women accountable for exploiting unequal relationship dynamics that some pull out every trick in the book to dodge accountability. It's several factors at once that create the "friend zone". If you both had no romantic interest in…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:14 AM
8

So, you're saying that there are an infinity of issues that men face. Interesting. Of course there's more than the 4 issues from the video. Male Genital mutilation, family court bias, lack of concern when boys are discriminated against in education, etc. There are many more issues that face men. Most people do not face every issue of gender discrimination in their lives. Not everyone is raped, but we shouldn't discount rape as an issue, eh? If you are only subject to one issue of gender discrimi…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:51 AM
4

Firefighters do know they are risking their lives voluntarily. By your logic, no who does anything should be compensated for their action -- No one can know the outcome of their effort with 100% certainty, so they shouldn't be paid. If you disagree, and do think that consequences of actions can be contemplated prior to performing them, and that a greater good can be a motivation for action even if it means risk of great self harm or death, then people can sacrifice themselves. You agree that kno…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 06:57 PM
1

If Youtube is editorializing their content then they no longer have safe-harbor provisions for user uploaded content under the DMCA. That's the shit I'd hit 'em with, the only shield they have against established old media. They don't want the question of common-carrier exemption disappearing for Youtube due to censorship even surfacing in the media. Perhaps write up an article questioning Youtube censorship against the MRM and calling out to others who are affected. They want to reserve the rig…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:21 PM
5

And what's worse, some of them work at Google, Facebook, and other online forums like reddit, ect. The only thing that stops censorship is making the censors look bad, real bad. To bad there's no phone number or mailing address for Google customer support. We'll just have to use the Striesand Effect instead.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:16 PM
1

No. Because: 4chan. Say goodbye to everything forever.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:02 PM
6

So, men make 133% of what women make, and women make 77% of what men make. That's a 666% difference!
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:58 PM
3

Yeah, well, that's why pappy had to name 'em all "random" names.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:55 PM
2

Here, I'll let you sew her snatch back up. We had to cut it rather than let it rip.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:51 PM
12

My corpse's body is mine and death's. I want my mortician to be a zombie. I'm sick of all these damn necrophiliacs drooling over my dead body! My car's body is its frame and mine. I want my mechanic to be a car. I'm sick of all these damn autoerotic bastards putting their greasy hands all over my slick hotrod.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:48 PM
7

Yeah, because Lesbian Doctors do not exist...
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:37 PM
0

Cartoons are frequently caricatures of reality. You will find exaggerations in nearly all art, from painted landscapes having idyllic vistas to the physiques of 'statuesque' statues. Of course, there is art that exaggerates the ugliness of existence, some even depicts normalcy (and thus stands apart from the majority of others works), some art represents purely abstract notions. If you look into a video game and see a caricature or normalcy or abstract weirdness -- Well, that's what you get, it'…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:18 PM
5

I concur. There is absolutely zero ideological bullshit I will take to heart, and that "don't fix things" is nonsense. There's a reason we do so. We wouldn't have that trait if women didn't select us for it over billions of years. That said, I will simply think for myself and apply my reasoning in any given situation on a case by case basis to dictate my action. That is the only rational thing to do. If that makes ME the patriarchy. Well, first off: prove it. Secondly: Why the hell should I care…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:09 AM
2

What a fool. Only a fool has a preconceived notion about "why", ignores any evidence that doesn't fit the assumption, presents no evidence to refute the counter claim or null-hypothesis, and makes blatantly nonfactual statements which can be easily disproved. I was once such a fool. Then I graduated elementary school. I mean, the little song she does at the end -- The very last line of her song demonstrates some heavy cognitive dissonance: "Reddit is a place where men can be men, and look at cat…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:58 AM
1

Well who do you think is expected to wash that giant dish?!
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:40 AM
4

So the latest feminist tactic in tech is to decry the "meritocracy" language as oppressive. Their "logic" is that because women don't make the same choices as men and some are not supposedly not afforded the same benefits of men that the answer is not to fix the problem, but to change the way we value contributions to society -- To artificially increase our perception of a person's value because of their sex... It's sexism. One thing I find interesting is that changing a name on a research paper…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:09 AM
1

Yeah, it's hard for many folks to realize that Women's Rights exists apart from the ideology of feminism. Good on you for supporting women's rights, I do too. I also advocate for men's rights, so I'm a Men's Rights Activist. I say I'm a Women's Rights Activist when advocating for women's rights, and Human Rights activist when advocating for Human Rights (non gendered rights). So, yeah, I'd call you a WRA, HRA and probably an MRA too. Rights activism doesn't need a bogus ideological framework to …
/r/MensRights24/01/14 08:20 AM
2

Texas is also rife with brutal Gerrymandering. Even if all the red citizens were replaced with blues, the red would still win after the next redistricting. Sorry to burst your bubble if you thought your votes actually mattered.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:18 AM
17

The other lesbian who had agreed to be a parent.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:52 PM
5

No doubt the next male bashing article won't even include an apologetic preamble to dissuade those she is about to attack that it's just SOME of the group that have a problem... unlike in this article where she merely suggests 'meanness', not horribly oppressive behaviour, yet feels the need to assure readers she's not a woman hater or anything. Man hater on the other hand? No need to clarify.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:01 PM
2

At first I assumed feminism was good, and paid it no mind. However, the first time a feminist told me to "check my privilege" I realized the ideology was insanity. How could a homeless rape victim who was just barely putting his life back together despite being turned away from both full homeless shelters and women's shelters (despite their vacancies), and suffered senseless beatings for amusement, and been literally spat on and pissed on, and been reviled for my state, told to "get a job", and …
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:41 PM
-4

Similarly, this is a strong claim. Where is the evidence for it? If it exists anywhere it's in the friend zone. Sadly, I have far more pressing things to research than this. Not that I disagree with you. I dislike the matter-of-fact assumptions as well. I'm not aware if women in general see men as disposable any moreso than society at large does. IMO, such could be related to the greater tendency to take for granted things generally expected of men and women. For a female centric example: Look a…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:28 PM
2

"Back the Fuck Up" "Shut the Fuck Up" Don't they know that the dumb potential rapist males have selective deafness? They'd only hear: "Fuck" "Fuck" Since we live in a rape culture, won't that have the opposite effect than she desires?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:11 PM
2

Just once I'd like to see a politician or comedian or company or magazine say, "No. What we said was free speech. I agree. Though comedy is usually self deprecating, it's also the last bastion of unapologetic free speech.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:45 AM
1

Fear is the first thought that comes to mind when I think of Feminism threatening the Men's Movement with violence. Not fear of death, for I have none, but fear of history repeating itself. Their hate (rhetorical or otherwise) only solidifies our resolve to see the ideology is ended to ensure we have nothing to fear. It's reminiscent of when Japan attacked Pearl Harbour. The American people were divided about entering the war. It would be quite foolish for any military strategist to pack so many…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 09:45 AM
8

Arial is an Arian font that tolerates no serifs! They seek to eliminate the minority of smaller lines and promote only the majority!
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:36 AM
2

Speaking in a very general, on-average sense, most women incline towards a more polite/diplomatic/empathic style of discussion while most men incline towards a more blunt/factual/direct style of discussion. Men should watch their language around women.......... Yay, progress! Fuck that. Men and Women shouldn't have to change how they speak on the basis of sex. These bullshit speech codes are tyranny at its finest. Sticks and stones break bones and words don't do a damn thing -- No, really, word'…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:17 AM
3

but the source isn't exactly one we should be supporting. If a feminist blog had a good article about men's issues, I'm submitting it here. The important thing is to not conflate linking to a few articles as support for everything else they believe. As an atheist I discuss philosophy with deists, and link to catholic websites -- Doesn't mean I'm supporting Catholicism or deism in the least.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:00 AM
-1

Gotcha. The Germans who didn't rip down the anti-Semitic posters and just thought it was probably true shouldn't be held at all to blame -- But what if when they open their mouths and repeat that shit? You know, like Wil did? Sorry, I see your point, but will always disagree with it. Those guys are evil. Stupid, but evil. They're called 'useful idiots', and it's dangerous to ignore them.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:49 AM
12

By your logic we shouldn't bash the feminists because they're easily fooled by the "if you believe in equality you're a feminist" bullshit. Nope, idiocy has no excuse. It's like believing in Santa Claus because you were told he was real by everyone around you. That's understandable of a child who had no power to do their own research. To cope with the real world most grow out of their naivete... Wil hasn't and so I'll bash him as I would any other foolish feminist who refuses rationality and ass…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:17 AM
14

Well, in that case, "Shut Up Wesley!"
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:55 AM
37

He stars on Geek and Sundry's Youtube channel with Felicia Day of 'The Guild' Internet fame. Plays table-top games with celebrities on video. That said, I only tried to watch that crap channel before realizing it's yet another "I'm a 'nerd' who's never actually been bullied because of it, but I wear the geek label because it's hip now," bullshit. Combined with 'Women are Wonderful' gynocentric awe over a "girl gamer" who can barely act. Note: As a game developer, I don't have anything against wo…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:49 AM
6

I would merely appeal to his sense of logic: "There's much evidence to the contrary, Wheaton; You have not tried try to refute the null hypothesis before holding your belief." Not that it would actually work -- He's an actor who once played a young scientist -- but many of his viewers practice rationality.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:39 AM
3

Most fairy tales have incredibly submissive women and are very sexist toward women Interestingly enough, most romance novels (female porn) bought by females today have submissive women and dominant men. Are the women buying '50 Shades of Gray' being sexist towards themselves now? No? Then what makes you think the stories of the past were sexist? Perhaps your label "sexist" is right fucked in the head. I'd ask you to refute the Null Hypothesis for your illogical belief that "fairytales were told …
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:31 AM
1

Hmm, wouldn't she just say: Obviously Macbeth is an example of vilifying females from a society that hates women.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:21 AM
14

"as men, we have no right to tell women what rape is" This is the result of feminist Standpoint "Theory": If you haven't been a women, then you can't possibly relate to women's issues. If you haven't been a minority you can't possibly relate to minority issues. Etc. That's ridiculous because mimesis (modeling the experience of others within our minds) is key to human learning from birth. Furthermore this "theory" gives rise to the moronic belief that the oppressors are blind to how their actions…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 01:02 PM
1

I agree to an extent, just would like to clarify. But everyone knows that a woman in peak physical condition cannot outperform a man in peak physical condition (in relation to marathons!!!). This is why all sports are split by gender, its just a fact. Some women have more stamina and power then some men, even when considering both in peak physical condition. The point is that not all men have the same potential level of performance due to biological factors that produce varying size, muscle mass…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:59 AM
1

Not a logic problem, a Pedantry problem. In cybernetics we have developed machine learning systems that can extract meaning despite errors. The trick is to focus on the signal, not the noise. You're balking at edge cases and minor syntax errors like a dumb BASIC terminal from the 80's. The machines have surpassed your reasoning. You have a brain, but refuse to use it. That's illogical. You're a fool.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:07 PM
1

Yep. That's what happens when people don't think for themselves.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:03 PM
5

As a scientist it always amazes me how easy it is for so many people to assume the government works in the best interest of their own people... Even though that's an unproven assumption, and we have much historical fact and evidence to the contrary. Then in the next breath they will demand evidence to back up conspiratorial claims... It's got to be due to ignorance. That's the only explanation. I mean, take this instance you're talking about. It's common knowledge to anyone who's read the books …
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:27 PM
3

Sex. It's what life's made of. Women do wear more revealing clothes when ovulating. Humans do have subconscious instincts -- If you can flinch without thinking of it, or suckle right out of the womb, you know that the brain can contain predispositions for behaviours not requiring conscious effort. In fact, evidence shows that the way you dress may not be fully conscious but also influenced by instinctual (sexual) drives. Blush and lipstick mimic the flushing of sexual arousal that male humans ar…
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:55 PM
3

Seriously, stop bitching and be productive Yes! make some calls, do something. ... so, Bitching?! ugh. Please tell me: How effective will one person calling or doing "something" be compared to "bitching" about it (AKA raising awareness) THEN having more people calling and doing "something"? False dichotomies are for fools. We can do all of the above.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:20 PM
1

I support Civil Rights to keep Cronyism in check, but I'd much rather have both biased movements be gone. <sup>-</sup> That is what you sound like to me.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:55 PM
7

both groups are fighting against traditional gender roles. Incorrect. I do not fight against traditional gender "roles". As a cyberneticist I don't believe the roles exist as anything other than emergent behaviour. Why would I fight against nature, and thus physics itself? That's asinine. What I do advocate for is awareness of how societal expectations placed on men and women affects them. If you see how this affects you, and you're all for it, then far be it from me to "fight against" your own …
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:59 AM
0

I wholeheartedly agree. I hate feminism and misandry, but I will defend to the death a bigot's right to say or publish ignorant shit. It's like these censorious idiots never heard of The Streisand Effect.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:51 PM
1

Poor things have internalized so much misogyny they're OK with being regular non-feminist women. The poor victims are so blind their own victimhood -- they'll never wind up in a shelter at this rate.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:08 PM
1

If you want people to stop believing something they believed before, you need to give them an alternative that's not too far removed. Explain: atheism? Deconversion doesn't call for another deity or religion, one can simply just not believe. Helping folks cease to believe in the BS ideology of feminism is really all I expect out of anti-feminism. Rights and equality are another matter altogether. Women's Rights is the alternative to Feminism. Feminism is an ideology. Neither Women's Rights nor M…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:54 PM
5

While the MRM does not yet have an academic background or a rigid set of beliefs associated with it, due to the movement’s young age. I agree with the academic background part, and this will be fleshed out using science, but if you think we'll ever have a rigid set of beliefs associated with MRM then you thought wrong. This is due to the fact that such ideologies are stupid. Men's Rights is about the Rights of Men -- Not about any fucked up ideological narrative, and it never will be. Feminism s…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:54 PM
1

"If you could be a flower, which would you be". Whole Wheat, because I think outside the box.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:24 AM
-4

Last I checked, crude language doesn't invalidate any academic research. Science doesn't give a damn about profanity, bitches. In fact, academic research including AVFM could seek to quantify whether or not crude language use is more or less likely to attract attention to the issues they present. Academia is not synonymous with PC speech codes.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 07:07 AM
-8

Nothing about fighting for women's rights requires an ideology of women as oppressed victims, yet feminism includes such unrealistic narrative. They do so for political means. It wins funding and supports their campaign of indoctrination through academia. Protip: Sticks and stones can break bones, but word's don't hurt. Why are you so hung up on the words you deem bad that you can not get the message? Seems like a language based shaming tactic to me. Opinions voiced in crude language are automat…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:55 AM
-6

Oh fallacy, how I adore thee, let me count the ways: ssociation with AVFM (and, by extension, association with you) has discredited these men's participation in academia. Guilt by association. I know you're going to find some way to rationalize this away as some orchestrated conspiracy The Conspiratorial Pigeon Hole you're an insane and disturbed person with a tenuous grasp on reality, Ad Hominem. this very same attitude of entitled "why can't I call bitches bitches?" that reveals AVFM (and, oft…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:23 AM
1

Hmm. "safe spaces for women"... I wonder how well "safe spaces for whites" would go over?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:14 AM
2

It's bullshit. Mansplaining stems from the bogus feminist standpoint "theory" wherein men can't know what it's like to be a women, and the oppressors can't know what it's like to be oppressed, so what they say doesn't count. Even if it weren't bat-shit stupid at every level, it would be internally inconsistent because if you ever achieve equality nothing you say matters. Your view of reality is completely different than theirs, so stop trying to mansplain to them abut how reality doesn't give a …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:36 AM
2

Oh, I like this game. Now take the L out.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:30 AM
3

Well, If that was my motive I'd have offered my lap instead.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:19 AM
1

/r/MRRef
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:08 AM
4

You're oppressing me with your logic!
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:58 AM
4

Now, put that in the first panel, and swap the genders... Instant outrage.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:47 AM
3

"What are the Causes" Meh. Anyone can see. Focus on the solution, not the problem. IMO, this problem focused media doesn't help much, it can help spread awareness but can also reinforce the narrative that men are disposable. It has Radfems just gibbering in glee. One of the problems with media in general is that the very "messages" mentioned exist. You see, "Strike" used to evoke a sense of solidarity, but since the 80's unions have been under attack across the world, so that word doesn't have t…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:21 AM
3

As a game developer: Fuck Game Journalism. There are a few smaller review and news sites with integrity, but I haven't seen a single popular one that wasn't a biased bleeding ass. Look at things from the publishers' standpoint: They want to sell copies. Journalists need pre-release access to the games to create the news and reviews and keep from being scooped. Publishers see journalism as a system to be controlled for the profitable marketing of products. Bad review? You may not get a pre-releas…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:52 AM
1

Screw dating, but screw online dating the most. I gave up on the damn dating game. It's a huge waste of time. Now I have so much time for fun hobbies. At the end of the day I'm actually satisfied with accomplishments, instead of ashamed of them, dreading pointless arguments or worse: boredom. If I was looking to date again I'd further a relationship with someone who has things in common with me: A women who actually likes soldering transistors and LEDs into art at the makerspace, or one who make…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:39 AM
10

PLEASE consider seeing a therapist. Just make sure they're not following the Duluth Model... or, in my experience, they'll make it worse. In other words avoid domestic abuse therapists and just see a regular therapist -- Strange how prevalent sexism is in domestic abuse therapy, or sad rather. Something like this will shatter how you feel towards women, It may or may not. Surely it will have an effect on the victim, but whether it shatters anything or not is a case by case basis. For instance: I…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:14 AM
2

The Internet is where ideologies go to die.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:54 AM
1

Protip: Google Exists. Stop wasting our time fuckwit.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:51 AM
2

Hmm. Increasing the rate of false pregnancy accusations will make it harder for people to take real pregnancy victims seriously. Teach babies not to fertilize.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:37 AM
2

I don't care about whether someone calls themselves a feminist or not. I do, because their ignorance and donning of said label often lends political and financial support to misandrists. You wouldn't tolerate me wearing the banner KKK and claiming to support racial equality, "Oh he's a 'good white supremacist', I don't care about those guys." Sorry, pal, but I'm calling you out on some bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 03:13 AM
0

This is why I don't believe in a god. If I did, then I'd have to come to the realization that they hate me.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:57 AM
3

women don't have equal pay at least if feminists are believed, They shouldn't be believed. There are lots of sick people in hospitals, does that mean that the hospital is causing sickness? No. There are jobs which are predominantly male or female occupied, does that mean the policy of the employer is sexist? No. Never married women have made more than comparable never married men since the 70's, you know, when Radical Feminism began -- They didn't cause this, and as you've said, they still claim…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:40 AM
4

Had it all along, actually... ...so, if the benefits and quotas for female positions were leveraged upon a system that was already equal, it didn't create more equality, it just disadvantaged some while advantaging others on the basis of their sexes.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:34 AM
5

Yes, women should be equal to men. So, if the woman can abort a child, take the morning after pill, give up a child for adoption, drop them off at a safe house, no questions asked, no child support required. Men should at least have the right to not have to pay child support for a pregnancy they have no say in aborting, taking morning after pill, etc. If a man tells a woman: Hey, I don't want to be a father. Then she shouldn't be able to make him. Just like you would shit bricks if men could for…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:01 AM
5

All it means is they think MRA's want to take away womens rights. Which is certainly true. You guys do want to take away some rights women have. You're a troll. There is a time and a place for radical actions that break social norms, that time is not now for mens rights activists. Correction, double troll.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 04:49 AM
5

I find much of the MRA community to be quiet toxic on issues I care about. Unless you list the issues you care about, specifically the ones "much of the MRA community is quite toxic" about, I'm labelling you a concern troll. Not because you're gay, but because you sound like the same bullshit concern trolling that's all too common. Including your edit about not ever feeling disadvantaged on the basis of your sex. It all just sounds precisely like the trolls out to discredit or dismiss the MRM. H…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 04:38 AM
0

I think it's more a question of cultural / institutional determinacy than the idea that women are somehow fundamentally drawn to more "feminine" professions. You would be wrong, as much cross cultural evidence shows gender differences in behaviours -- Behavioural tendencies that happen to align with certain professions more than others, I might add. From the link: Gender differences in personality traits are largest in prosperous, healthy, and more gender-egalitarian cultures. I'm interested to …
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:02 AM
2

But then it wouldn't get as many page views since it's not presenting sexism as harming women. Yes, a dipshit thing to do. It's why I don't grant institutions respect, only individuals.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:59 AM
18

Reality cares not for validation. You either present it accurately, or it makes you a fool. I can't validate feminism, every time I've investigated its claims they have been invalid.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 03:08 AM
0

I just know that it's not how I want to work Good for you. You can be the pussy foot, and anti-feminsts (anti-ideologists, really, AKA scientists) like me can face the brunt of the feminist assault against rationality, intellectual integrity, and male nature without your assistance. We're on the same side, but fuck you very much for that. Protip: Institutionalized Feminist theory is largely the reason you even have anything to work towards, fool. It's like trying to fight Nazis with roses and pe…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:35 AM
-2

Her beliefs are unfounded and based on unevidenced confirmation bias -- Like all other feminists, since that's core to feminism.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:12 AM
-1

Only after segregation and retaliation. See also, Civil Rights and the end of Jim Crow, etc. Additionally: "Safe Spaces" for women -- It's like whites only areas, but sexist.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:09 AM
-1

Feminism on Male Nature The social construct of masculinity is seen by feminism as problematic because it associates males with aggression and competition, and reinforces patriarchal and unequal gender relations. There is no evidence that masculinity exists as a social construct. There is no evidence that masculinity is problematic. There is no evidence that masculinity associates males with aggression or competition -- In fact, women are as aggressive or more aggressive than men. There is no ev…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:18 AM
3

No, it was first about shaming men as oppressive, and getting the workforce twice the workers for the same pay by devaluing the parenting role and convincing women they weren't worth anything if they weren't working, so that the government can normalize the method of indoctrination of children. [Engels] argues that a woman's subordination is not a result of her biological disposition but of social relations, and that men's efforts to achieve their demands for control of women's labor and sexual …
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:12 AM
0

Well, I know all about biology. Hell, not only can men orgasm without ejaculation, men can even ejaculate without orgasm. So, I was right with you, up until this: But ignorance and misinformation absolutely destroys any validi concerns Men's Rights presents Let's consider I hold two view points (I hold many more, but just for example's sake). Let's say A is about, oh, erection not being a form of consent. And for the sake of argument, let's say B is an ignorant belief about female orgasm due to …
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:49 AM
5

No! Fuck that! That's the last bastion we explorers have against global mind-rot. Send her to Venus, let the MRM expand to Mars.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 08:22 PM
11

Marches? What for? Talks are better at disseminating information, and even those have been met with feminist opposition. Many folks think anti-feminist is anti-woman, but every MRA I know is pro Women's Rights and Men's Rights. Feminism is an ideology, but lots of regular folks are told, "If you believe in equality, you're a Feminist", and they ridiculously equate women's rights with feminism. "If you believe in being good to your neighbour, you're a Christian." "If you believe in individualism,…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 10:17 AM
1

And repressed...
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:21 AM
2

the father had the right to know that his underage sex really helped destroy that girl's life. Not their sex? Interesting... I wonder if there's anything she's responsible for at all? I mean, if it was just his sex why not call it rape then, eh? The conception was probably an accident, and they both decided to have sex, but you give her a pass because she was young and he had no control over her family's action? The guy decides to have consensual sex, same as her, and she's actually plotting to …
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:20 AM
6

Signs someone will not hit you again: "will not"? Get real moron. They're backing away from you, or turn away Roundhouse kick. Backhand. Fetching a weapon. Arms and legs are down or out to either side Front kick. Upper cut. Head-butt. Cross. Hands are open Open Hand thrusts can be lethal as they leverage the larger bones of the arm more directly without the 'cushion' of more easily broken fingers. Also, open hand state may indicate a slap, scratch, pull, throw, etc. Facial expression is surprise…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 11:13 AM
20

Why the fuck do we go around saying it is okay to not hit women only? Some people do so because of Chivalry, or the typical strength disparity between men and women (capability to cause greater harm), etc. However, the video was saying the opposite: That hitting is very likely to result in being hit back, and it's wise to assess the retaliation capabilities of those you would direct violence towards. Why hit people at all? Well, you can't control other people's actions. Self defence is a good re…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 10:53 AM
1

Identity Politics: Take an event or individual portrayal, expand it to be representative of a larger demographic's identity in order to have greater impact than warranted, specifically to marginalize or incite action. Eg: This woman is portrayed as a sex object; The film makes women as a gender out to be sex objects; Boycott the film. -or- This thread is an embarrassment; It shows the subreddit to be full of circlejerkers; It makes me hate most of /r/mensrights. Bullshit detected. You failed it …
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:59 AM
3

First off, as a scientist I need evidence that any perceived portrayals in the media correlate to a CHANGE in perception by the viewers. For instance, I just posted this in response to an underwear ad campaign apparently meant to shame men into buying new underwear. The sexy model disrobes and is wearing threadbare underwear, "If I can't get away with wearing these, then why should men?" [link for coupon for men's underwear] ... the ratty underwear are sexier to me. Ratty underwear are presented…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:03 AM
2

Interestingly, concision is a speech control tactic linguist Noam Chomsky discusses in his analysis of the mainstream media message control system.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:40 AM
7

Beyond just not having 'an issue' with well worn panties: The threadbare pair are more erotic depending on context and observer preference. I have experienced circumstances wherein a partner actually ripping off underwear is a part of the agreed upon disrobing method. If such occurrence is frequent enough then the tattered underwear can even be a partner's cue to escalate sexual advances. It's preferable to have a ratty pair of undies torn asunder than waste a perfectly good pair. Yet another ex…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:11 AM
21

Well, I'm not saying the offended caused the offensive words, but we could teach people how to reduce their chances being offended as a preventative measure. Teach folks not to give a fuck.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 09:40 AM
1

You're not thinking at the right level. These ideologies were designed to fulfill different means than they present at face value. That's why we call their followers "useful idiots". Feminism does not grant the family unit a choice of who can stay home to raise the child, it removes that choice. Feminism devalues the parenting role and shames women who do not enter the workplace as voluntarily oppressed thereby getting the state twice the workers for essentially the same pay (even in capitalist …
/r/MensRights24/12/13 07:22 AM
1

No the sad thing is that you don't think these systems should be eradicated outright and are instead arrogant enough to assist in rule over the lives of people, and although you apparently graduated high school you don't know what irony is. What a coincidence.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:13 AM
1

The law also used to dictate Jim Crow. Fuck the law if it can't be changed.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:07 AM
4

No. Feminism's cultural Marxism leads directly to totalitarian thought police. If anything we're being generous. Please educate yourself.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:58 AM
2

Nah, the professional political feminists are starting to realize they can't just make up bullshit and act a fool -- It's a gold mine for us when they do so. That's why only the bash back folks showed up at the last rally -- The feminists organized a separate rally of their own across town. Equal parts diversion and to keep the useful idiots who ignorantly don the feminist label from finding out the MRM isn't a hate group and questioning the lies they've been told us. The loss of life among MRAs…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:30 AM
2

Lynn says that he wanted to understand why men and women were said to be equally intelligent even though men had bigger brains. That's simple. I quantify base-lines of complexity required for emergent intelligence all the damn time. The number of neurons and connections between them is what yields intellect -- Not the size. For instance: I have a cybernetic simulation that optically recognizes and tracks stars for a telescope. It fits in 1/1000th the space that the Apollo program's computers did…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:51 AM
1

There is something wrong with you for allowing yourself to be repeatedly abused. Interesting. I would like you to explain all the myriad of things wrong with abused children then. I mean, they caused their own circumstances by allowing the abuse to continue too, eh? Oh, no? There were circumstances beyond their control? Ah, I see... So you're just a fucking moron then, eh? Idiots like you who disregard the normal human capacity for tolerance and ignorantly declare there's something wrong with th…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:19 AM
11

...could have regurgitated feminist rhetoric better than this author has.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:40 AM
11

egalitarian (classical?) feminism was solely about giving women equal rights You have been deceived. Feminism has always been an ideological assumption shored up with confirmation bias. I suppose one could argue that this was about increasing women rights, however note that it was not "solely about giving women equal rights" -- Key to any Marxist theory is the oppressor/oppressed dynamic. Men have always been demonized by feminism, since its inception. Get your shit strait: [Feminism] argues tha…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:10 AM
2

Orwell's works, for example...
/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:05 AM
9

more men are opting out of building their own nuclear family Correct. As a cyberneticist I've opted to build a mechanoelectric family using solar instead of nuclear power -- It's just more accessible at present. In other words: There are so many other wonderful and enriching things to do than go bananas over ancient ape mating drama. I mean, I tried the nuclear approach. Blew up in my face, it did. After I dealt with the damage I'm so much happier enjoying things I like. Sometimes I just listen …
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:02 PM
6

Maybe some keep playing because they're uneducated gambling addicts? Mathematicians don't play the lottery, if they go to Vegas they go to have a good time, not to win the jackpot.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:37 AM
2

Yep. I agree. SJWs want to see 50/50 men and women in CEO and congress and engineering and sciences and mathematics... And yet, there's nothing stopping women from doing the jobs. Because the SJW thinks that men and women are not different they assume men and women will select the same choices in life at the same rates. Take game development for example: Zero barrier to entry, we offer free engines, free assets, free tutorials, free advice and help, all you need is a computer and the willingness…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:33 AM
4

She doesn't need to, you idiot. I get rape and death threats from 4chan just trying to give away free video games. That's how they say, "hi". I can easily open up (anonymous) comments and select as many examples of "hate speech" as I want from within, and that's just on a download page for my free games. However, I'm not a female like Anita, so I can't play the victim card after purposefully stirring shit and damseling myself like Anita did -- Nor would I want to, I'm not trying to farm trolls f…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:54 AM
2

Consider this fool: 4chan. Your argument is refuted. We couldn't have stopped this moronic form from being abused by trolls if we tried. Better to call attention to it now than let some professional trolls pull off far more subtle and dangerous trolling.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:44 AM
12

Well, anti-feminism could be considered hate speech. The Swedish feminists even have scientists running scared, keeping any results they requested that may contradict the party line from coming to light, or bailing to Norway -- Which is not as bad, but getting there. This is one reason why the MRM is important. Totalitarian thought police is a natural result of giving political power to a group of self righteous 'moral' crusaders who can't stand criticism. It's one of many reasons why Feminazi i…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:31 AM
6

Evolution has proven working together to benefit the group is an advantageous trait. Humans share a social gene with the calm sexual bonobo that the openly aggressive chimps do not have. It is not our job to disprove the stupidity. The burden of proof is on the stupid for claiming, "It goes against the male instinct to dominate and grasp for power." especially since a human male, as the bonobo male, allows himself to be dominated by females. Additionally, define "power". Females refusing to mate…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:22 AM
2

That's what the strong are like. You are wrong. That's what the evil and selfish are like. I take it you've never had a strong positive role model in your life if that's how you think strong people act. Strong enough physically to take does not equate to being evil or selfish enough to do so. Strength doesn't actually lend itself to selfishness, because strength in numbers can over power any strong person. To leverage strength effectively one typically uses strength in the service of others, not…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:04 AM
15

Misandry is on Facebook. To connect with Misandry, sign up for Facebook today.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 12:03 PM
3

Bad advice. You can't win that game, then you're just the whiny guy stirring up shit -- even though your shit stirring is in response to theirs. No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. - Einstein
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:50 AM
3

Yeah, I get that vibe sometimes too. Then again, and this is in no way condoning taking advantage of drunk folks, I have been black out drunk and woken up naked next to a big girl. My brother is notorious for taking embarrassing video of folks being asses at parties, and there I was, coming on to this girl, me seemingly buzzed but not slurring words, yet I couldn't remember that or half the stuff that happened that night. The video made it clear as day we were all over each other and I took her …
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:51 AM
8

I would argue the contrary; patriarchy theory explains this phenomenon with the idea that men are expected to hold power in all situations. It's not a theory. That's an unproven hypothesis. It has no explanatory power because it's not true. If it was true, we'd have some hard peer reviewed unbiased evidence, but we don't despite forty years of Radial Feminism (Patriarchy + Marxist Feminism = Radical Feminism). Furthermore your statement is instantly bullshit because of the absolutist term "all".…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 09:46 AM
2

They do it by proxy. Read the Declaration of Independence, that part about the abuses suffered due to the King of Great Brittan: He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance. They're not living with you, but the NSA and DHS might as well be "swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance" in the form of taxes. It's an interesting list of abuses. Today there's an analog for most things it cite…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:40 AM
1

Paul Elam's stance: By refusing gays the right to get married, we are also refusing them many other rights taken for granted by the rest of the population. Were things that simple, this would be a no brainer. But, as we often see when it comes to the law, things are not near that simple. And the more we examine the realities on the ground we find that a legal marriage is not a pathway to expanded rights, but a direct route to allowing state functionaries to eviscerate personal freedoms. Also, an…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:57 AM
1

Pesky reality, always getting in the way of ideology. The market is such that folks with experience are unemployed and seeking your job. Guess we'll have to teach all men to Stand up for themselves and Man up, eh? Let's turn a blind eye to boys being bullied then? It's sometimes quite amazing the level of cognitive capacity humans apparently lack. Comments like this are quite ridiculous: You can't stamp out bullying. You teach your sons how to handle being bullied. To use his masculinity to defe…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:12 PM
5

Another good one is the fact they're far more likely to die of a car accident or heart disease, yet they feel perfectly safe driving the kids to get a Happy Meal.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:02 PM
2

You're right it needed to be protested. But at the very least people should have given them the opportunity to recognise the concern before the spamming. Uh, you're a concern troll right? I mean, it takes time and energy to set up that crap. The folks installing the anonymous report explicitly wanted to ignore the concern that it could be used for harm, because that's what its intended purpose was. The time for consideration was before it went live. Now, consider the fact that the people who "sh…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:39 PM
3

Selective enforcement of the law is a tool of the police state.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:33 PM
4

Ah yes, "violent male", just because the fathers' concern for their kids can make them as belligerent as a mother bear protecting her cubs... wait, what?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:49 AM
7

It's your responsibility to pay for your child. No, it's your responsibility to provide for your offspring the best you can. If that means the best you can is nothing at the moment, that's what you should be required to provide. The government has programs to help feed kids and poor folks, so what gives? Selling your car is not going to help you get or keep a job. Minimum wage isn't going to get you $400, since most of those jobs are part-time. This time of year everyone's hired up for Black-Fri…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:36 AM
0

Well, the women's movement has had selfish entitled women and also hateful Feminists in it, but the Women's Movement is not Feminism... So, there's that. Learn about Feminism's roots and history, and the invention of Patriarchy Theory, and their attempt to co-opt all women's issues then all gender issues, and now prevent men's issues from having a voice outside Feminsm. Meanwhile, strictly Women's Rights or Human Rights folks are still good people. It's the ideology of feminism that's the source…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:51 AM
1

Where does the misandry and sexism that is deeply ingrained in modern feminism come from? It comes from Feminism, that's what it is. The social construct of masculinity is seen by feminism as problematic because it associates males with aggression and competition, and reinforces patriarchal and unequal gender relations. On Feminism from wikipedia. Like all feminism, this hypothesis is not proven. There is no evidence that masculinity is problematic or a social construct or that it reinforces pat…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:28 AM
5

He's causing the behavior of her continuing to abuse him You are a fucking idiot. I guess the Jews were causing the behavior of the Nazis continuing to murder them too? Fuck you moron. Oh, he could just leave? Yeah, "wife". That means something, and kids as well. Let's see... Oh! Divorce court. If there's children involved, then you really don't want to risk going through that shit if you don't have to. Being bashed up is actually less harmful in many cases than going through the legal wringer, …
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:57 AM
6

Sound of a Baby Being Circumcised
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:40 AM
4

is more persuasive than "value men and masculinity because it benefits only men" Remove the "only". Additionally, persuasion isn't the problem, it's persecution that's the problem. Women, in general, love men. However, the laws and rules are set against men and media denigrates them. You're trying to persuade folks who are men or love men that it's beneficial to help men? Well, color me unimpressed. Pointing out the problem is a stepping stone to changing the systems which affect men and boys, n…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:51 AM
3

Are openly trans* men welcome in the MRM? Are you sentient? If you can comprehend that that was a question, then Welcome. How do MRAs view sex vs gender? With binoculars. It's a cage match, so you're relatively safe, but you don't want to get any on you. Joking aside: They're the same damn thing. I'm a cyberneticist, and as such I make a keen distinction between physical constructs and behaviors emergent thereof. So, what gender is a creature with XY chromosomes? In mammals (and some insects) th…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:21 AM
5

Selective skepticism is a fine art. One needs to evaluate precisely where one's own agenda chafes against rationality, and lubricate with just the right amount of feigned ignorance, bias, and/or denial. Always have your victim shroud at the ready: From within it you can shine out righteous indignation while remaining shielded from any criticism.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:18 AM
7

A man had to exercise all his options BEFORE sex Protip: AFTER sex too. That is to say, ensure your seed isn't left behind for crazy to impregnate herself with. Additionally: Always check the condoms for holes. Breaking should be very rare. It happens twice, red flag that something is up that shouldn't be. Before I had a kid I was far less paranoid, and far more naive. Yes, this kind of thing does actually happen.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:12 AM
5

maybe she'll organize a campaign to try to have me fired from my job. I hope some day the funding will exist to pay you a comfortable salary for just doing the M(H)RA stuff you're so good at. Imagine her trying to get you fired from your job if that were your job? heh. Also: Lesson from GWW, if you do advocate for MRM and your IRL ID is publicly knowable: Tell your boss to expect the trolls. It's saved my bacon twice now. Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:05 AM
11

Let's add it to the list. Maybe some day even ordinary folks won't be able to stand feminist BS: The social construct of masculinity is seen by feminism as problematic because it associates males with aggression and competition, and reinforces patriarchal and unequal gender relations. Aggression and competition aren't gendered. There's no evidence masculinity associates males with aggression... Don't you just hate sexism?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 12:44 AM
1

It's important to ask about such things. Know your enemy and all that. That is to say, I know several MRAs who took Women's Studies or Gender Studies courses while vehemently disagreeing with the entire subject. Sort of like how an atheist may be a scholar of religious texts. Don't get me wrong, I'd recommend not paying for and supporting such things you don't agree with esp. when one can learn them for free. However, there once was a time when libraries would not divulge reading habits, for dis…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:42 PM
5

Pretty odd considering the potty mouths on little girls and boys. I mean, how repressive to think a little vulgarity would keep a bright young girl from entering tech. Has she ever seen an all-girl school? I mean, the gossip, backstabbing, etc. Sheesh. Pretending that little girls are fragile is just daft.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:32 PM
3

And the use of Nazi is wrong too. Forgive this fool, they know not of what be spake.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:26 PM
1

if ( 1 > 0 ) puts( "Penis is greater than Vagina!? Math is Patriarchy!" ); else if ( 1 == 0 ) puts( "Stop trying to define me!" ); else puts( "NAFALT!" );
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:21 PM
2

women in Saudi want their equivalent to 1960s feminism I'm going to go ahead and give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you meant Marxist Feminism, because it doesn't make sense to want the radical feminsm which is Marxist Feminism + Patriarchy Theory. If you meant non-radical feminism you should have picked an earlier, less ambiguous, year. Note however, that Marxist Feminism is just as flawed an ideology as Radical Feminism (or any re-branding thereof) because they are based on unprove…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:37 PM
2

You have confused Feminism with Women's Rights. Feminism is an ideology that espouses the belief that masculinity is problematic because aggression is gendered. That's bullshit. Women's Rights is, well, rights for women. Feminism is not equality. "If you believe in being good, you're a Jehovah's Witness" -- Would you believe this crap? "If you believe in equality, you're a feminist." -- Why would you believe this crap? Women's rights do not need bogus ideologies, Unless the goal is to give them …
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:08 PM
3

not about hating feminism. The scientists don't hate creationism, they just have massive evidence that it's bullshit. I don't hate feminists, I just have massive evidence that feminism is all just bullshit confirmation bias that doesn't test the null hypothesis. Rights movements do not need ideologies. The feminist's ideal that "Masculinity is problematic" is unevidenced bullshit. Aggression and competition aren't gendered, or even necessarily evil (protectors are aggressive). The MRM does not n…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:48 PM
7

That offends me. Note: I can take offense at anything I want. Therefore if you allow me to censor what I find offensive, I can simply censor anything I disagree with.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:39 PM
2

What I find interesting is that males of the species are uniformly keen to pick up on subtle cues females give them. The females typically passively attract mates and males are more active in seeking sex in nearly all mammals. Females are better at emoting their feelings in general and males are more sensitive to them. Society as a whole is better attuned to seeing the feelings of women, and women frequently verbalize them; Whereas men are masters of non-verbal communication, forming and maintai…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:47 AM
11

What's sad is that the Hitchhiker's Guide To the Galaxy H2G2.com was the original open repository for mentionable things noteworthy or unmentionable or not. Douglas Adams invented the concept Wikipedia became famous for. On H2G2: If some fine fellow wanted to opine on the proper way to unpickle a pickle jar it was there. If somefolks wanted to debate the postmodernist view of anterior-postmodern derrière humor, they could. If a lady wanted to present a day in the life of a microbe upon a mole be…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 05:50 AM
4

IMO, cyberbullying is when some lamer gets flamed and crybabies about it to their troglodyte parents. That is: It's been going on since the BBS era, and Wow! It's NOTHING! In other words: It's when you take the crap that 6th graders say and do to each other and put it online -- There it becomes infinitely more offensive and hurtful, because the interwebz are serious biznaz. Sticks and Stones may break my Bones, but Words Online and OMFG YOU'RE LITERALLY HITLER!
/r/MensRights14/12/13 05:15 AM
2

Mars One
/r/MensRights14/12/13 05:10 AM
13

Will GitHub start removing repositories of software that doesn't fit their political agenda? The correct question is: Will developers realize that GitHub is a farce and that Gitosis or even a one-liner, "touch git-daemon-export-ok && mv .git/hooks/post-update.sample .git/hooks/post-update && git update-server-info", will create a stand alone publicly accessible git repository. Both accessible by Git HTTP protocol if you put the bare repo in a directory under Apache server (sudo apt-get install l…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:57 AM
2

after their partner is dead we now have to take their word for it Negative. Even the dead are considered innocent until proven guilty. Otherwise, all murderers get away with the crime. This doesn't lessen the degree to which we must assume the alleged murderer innocent until guilty, but once found guilty we should require the same standard of evidence to prove the dead was deserved of the violence if lightening of the sentence is to be considered. I do find it horrifying to think that murderers …
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:38 AM
5

Where is the evidence the man is violent initially? If it is there, the legal justice system already supports the woman. If it is not, how can we be sure he was? Self defense requires one to be in immediate fear of their lives. If the prick is sleeping, then you can escape without killing him. Killing may SEEM like the right thing to do when you've been abused due to anger you hold for the abuser, but that just means you're a murderer.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:32 AM
1

I have created a new law: It's not possible to discern whether incendiary comments to which Poe's Law may apply are meant to be satirical or not, but they are certainly meant to troll for comments. I call it: Troll's Law.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:29 AM
45

Women are as aggressive or more aggressive than men. Until society acknowledges this, yes, you are doomed.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 04:24 AM
6

You have to be really okay with yourself and a lot of men aren't Prove it. A lot of women and men aren't okay with each other. Until you place expectations on a child growing up they're perfectly happy with however they actually are. It's not the kid who decides "Hey, I'm not okay with being me" all on their own. It's the disparity between what they are and what they're expected to be that makes them not-okay with themselves. Even still, in lots of folks this is aligned, and they have no problem…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:02 PM
1

You don't get it. You don't own shit. You don't live in a free society, you just think you do, whatever you have they can take from you, and frequently do. The kid is old enough that other commenters think she's of a mind to make procreative judgements, and you think I'm overestimating the prevalence of spouting of the same line "I want to have my own money" that feminists invented to teach families that joint money isn't yours? Protip: If being single is your thing then the phrase should be: "I…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:17 AM
10

I sympathize with the people who want to fill the most valuable role as mother, father, or child rearer. These folk shouldn't be shamed. Just because a role exists doesn't mean filling it is wrong. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. If we had more parents (men or women) at home raising the kids the world would be a better place rather than letting the state raise them and normalize the method of human reproduction -- The better to indoctrinate you with my dear. It's condescending an…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:03 PM
5

Kind of like clueless idiots, eh? "Join the KKK, we believe in racial equality." Oh I believe in equality! "If you believe in racial equality, you're a KKK. Now let us teach you about the inherent evils of black nature." Hmm, well jails are full of blacks, so yay, KKK, pure white power! Let's make everyone equal to the amazing whites by teaching them the ways of whites. Blacks can overcome their blackness. Teach blacks not to be criminals! We would call this fool an idiot. Replace racial with ge…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:21 PM
6

Why oppose feminism and its marginal theory of power and the society in the first place? Well you see: Reasonable people usually don't let any ideology frame what they think about the society Consider that not opposing them lets them further the framing of the issues according to their flawed unevidenced ideology, even so far as to teach it in colleges as if it's not pure speculation and unproven hypotheses... Yeah, I'm not sure where you're coming from. Where would Science be if they didn't fig…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:11 PM
2

Her: How can you not want to-- I'm wearing the lingerie you bought! I spent an hour making myself pretty for you. Me: Funny, when I spend all day getting horned up over you it doesn't entitle me to sex. Sorry, I'm a bit depressed at the state of the universe at present. Have a wank? The only girl who didn't break up with me after something like that was a real keeper: "Oh, what's wrong? Gimme a hug." Too bad we moved apart.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:20 AM
2

Certainly more folks than those who say, "Wicked Tits", but your point stands valid none the less.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:16 AM
1

Maybe they're loathsome of their mother's genes and attribute their feminine beauty to their father instead? IMO, no better compliment than your parents being attractive... If they're any indication of how you'll look when you're their age.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:14 AM
3

That's what the universe does to LSD when it's thinking through me.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:09 AM
1

Poe's Law demands I upvote to achieve equilibrium between those who do and don't believe it applies.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:59 PM
2

Well, you can't prove the rape happened? OK, we can't throw the accused in jail without evidence, but we can give you the benefit of counselling and information on how to reduce risk of future rape incidence.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:55 PM
2

we're both richer as a result. No you are not. Wealth is measured not in what you value your own stuff at, but at what the market as a whole values them. For instance: I have a working Commodore 64 including software and printouts that I wrote myself when I was 8 years old. The paper printouts are what is used to restore the magnetic software. I was traded the paper for the equivalent of one mowed yard, but I now value it at US$80 million dollars -- Not even joking, that's how much I'd be willin…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:15 PM
6

Yeah I heard of it. The graphics are overrated. Too much grinding even for basic gear. To even start crafting your own takes decades. Storyline is bland to a degree that's tragically unfunny. Town sentinels instant kill anyone with even a modicum of DPS. Mobs only spawn at shopping centres; Like a predictable zombie plot. Doesn't even compare in benchmarks against things made with Unreal.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:34 AM
1

After every other sentence all you have to do is say: "Prove it!" This line of feminist rhetoric is basically just Identity Politics: Portrayals of a women affect ideas about your own identity and the identity of all women? No. Prove it. I once asked 10 different people what they thought of a beer advert with the giant label across a triplet of women in one piece bathing suits. I didn't get the same response twice. One even pointed out that each was striking a different famous pose present in Gr…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:44 AM
1

What they are trying to do is I don't believe this is what they're trying, prove it. have the law in such a way that the more typical (male) rapist - one exploiting intoxication can be reported and convicted more easily. Where feminists messed up their patriarchy BS is that they went and embraced LGBT issues, so now they can't use "typically male", since now they don't accept the gender stereotype of "typically male", right? RIGHT? I mean, you didn't say "typical (male, unless they're a gender q…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:14 PM
4

Seems like she believes that Women's Rights are Human Rights, but that Men's Rights are not Human Rights. Just restate this sentiment and ask her if she's being sexist on purpose. I've been in a few similar relationships and tolerated such ignorance right on through the realization that the women were wilfully sexist towards men. If they can't gain equality perspectives, then after the breakup you'll see the beast's true form as they destroy you with assistance from anti-male biased courts, law …
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:17 PM
2

The males of most mammalian species are attracted to traits that indicate fertility: Sexual Maturity, Youth and Beauty. The females of most species are attracted to traits that indicate good genes, and provider traits: Large colourful expensive plumage that makes it easier for predators to spot you, big muscles, high social status, etc. This is why orangutan females are attracted to older gentler males with big cheek flaps -- He has proven his genetic superiority through survivability. In genera…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:08 PM
5

"sexual prime" Depends on what that means. Older cells make crappier eggs. Even if it's stem cells producing cells, a copy of a copy of a copy ... Entropy happens. Recreational sex? IMO, that depends on the experience and hormonal levels of the individual.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:59 PM
2

I wonder sometimes if my ancestors gave a flying fuck what anyone else thought when they were screwing Neanderthal gals, or Denisovan dudes? Part of me is them, and I say anyone who has a problem with my sexual preferences can get fucked -- That's my fetish, being a "creepy" fuck. flying f-- a Prehistoric mile-high club? Hmm.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:31 AM
2

Someone who doesn't dress similarly, style themselves similarly or act similarly to the majority of others will stand out and are often scorned over this. Which is dumb as fuck because if they convince a friend or two to adopt their view of anti-style then eventually corporations will turn it into an approved "angst" style counter-culture and sell it back to folks, esp. teens. See: Greasers, Preps, Beatniks, Hippies, Leathers, Bikers, Punks, Skaters, Grunge, Goths, Mod/Hipsters, Gamers / indie-g…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:58 AM
1

Interesting. What's your stance on ear and nose beards? Dreadlocks cool?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:50 AM
2

In science, when we find an exception to the rule, that disproves it.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:32 AM
-17

Well, anyone should find this comment tasteless. I'm a firm believer in freedom of speech, and in the context of jokes where folks know you're just kidding saying bigoted things for a laugh can actually help highlight prejudice that other folks may have -- Pointing out the bigotry. However, without context and presenting the statement in a way that could be taken as somewhat serious (though, one can argue it could hardly be taken seriously), especially while identifying as a group who's ideals a…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:06 AM
4

Or how about this example: No matter what we do people just don't like playing the damn sorcerer class. We've given the players every advantage we can think of, but no one wants to play them because they require hard work before they pay off, and success isn't guaranteed so the risk associated means loss of time. You know what though? Everyone has an equal chance of playing the damn sorcerer, but only a tiny group of dedicated fans is playing that class because they like the storyline. Now inste…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:30 AM
1

Delicious Lick. Seems legit.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 05:30 AM
8

cant /kant/ noun: cant; modifier noun: cant 1. hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or political nature. I'm assuming the "PC" stands for Politically Correct (not Personal Computer or Pubococcygeus muscle). women do make false accusations, regardless of the PC cant. To venture a guess at the implication the title is making, I'd say the PC cant they're referring to is that women just don't make false accusations -- I mean, really, who would even imagine the more v…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 05:21 AM
3

Yeah, my parents didn't believe me that media was in many ways biased when it comes to the suffering of men. So, I started pointing out the lack of men in statistics to my parents while watching the news. At first they said it was annoying. I kept doing it. Now they agree it's appalling.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:51 AM
2

Yeah, what do examples of false allegations and supposed reputable agencies artificially inflating the prevalence of victimization have to do with making laws that affect men? Maybe we should ask a feminist? /s
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:21 AM
3

whether or not feminists in history behaved with true equality in mind I know I am a feminist who does simply believe in equality. Thats the point I am making, This is what you sound like: "All I am trying to say is whether or not racists in history behaved with true equality in mind I know I am a racist who does simply believe in equality." "Thats the point I am making, many supremacists believe in equal rights." What you fail to realize is that Feminism's propaganda is false. "If you believe i…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 06:57 AM
7

mild social discomfort and pressure As a cyberneticist I can understand this statement; However, it's very misleading. Your discomfort comes from your own brain. The pressure you feel is your own doing. The biggest problem I have with social sciences is that they largely ignore neurology, and dismiss the individual's responsibility for their own damn brains. At the individual interaction level there is no such thing as society. Your mental model of the world is YOURS, and it is in YOUR head. You…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:22 AM
-2

I was once stranded in the middle of the Canadian wilderness for about three months. Every time I tried to leave camp it would start snowing, so I had to hunker down for the spring. I lived by ice-fishing, and built a shelter from pines and snow. There was a camp of natives ten miles or so away, but I couldn't make it to it. I had experience with construction work and was an avid camping enthusiast. It was tough but I came to enjoy the simple life. I'm a computer programmer by trade, but when th…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:09 AM
6

there are way too many internet "MRAs" who spend their time doing useless things. Contrast spreading information on the fastest and most wide spread information distribution system with any other awareness campaign's goal. Part of any activist movement is spreading awareness. Additionally: Look at the past SOPA Internet awareness campaign, or breast cancer awareness campaigns carried out online. These things do make a difference. It was just folks sitting on their bum posting banners online and …
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:46 AM
3

My feminism isn't like that! Typical moof-sexed male ideacolonist, your benevolent sarcasm is oppressive to contrarifinable people. Stop furthering strict victifarmer stereotypes, it reinforces strict humanatural roles. /s
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:17 AM
-2

That's a nice confirmation bias reinforcing claim you've got there, be terrible if something like the null hypothesis happened to it. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You've just been Hitch slapped. Hypothesis: Culture's desire for "Super Dymorphic" groups is increasing muscle mass in males and lessening muscle mass in females through shaming of non compliant individuals. Null Hypothesis: Culture's desire and shaming language are not statistically noticeab…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 02:58 AM
19

2010? Hell, try four decades further back: Never married women have earned more than never married men since at least the 1970's.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 02:41 AM
2

The litmus test for sluts is thus: If they screw creepy, they're sluts.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 02:37 AM
7

Protip: The person claiming rape already has the burden of proof. Well, they should anyway...
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:51 PM
1

babies.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:23 PM
2

This comment made me find my old VHS of Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back. Poor Lando. Those white storm troopers all up in his cloud city. All over some whiny white woman too! /s
/r/MensRights26/11/13 11:53 AM
3

I'll also apologize for creating Universities, inventing Computers, Discovering Microbes and Sanitizing medicine, etc. -- all while suffering under tyrants like everyone else did. Not even joking. When confronted with anti-white-male bias I often do apologize quite thoroughly for nearly every modern convenience and relate the associated hardships too -- Risking heresy for performing autopsies, etc. Oh, it's not that I'm racist myself, I adore all the contributions everyone has made to our world.…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 10:50 AM
2

Some Klan members don't hate minorities, they just want all races to be equal and for everyone to be aware of how the social construct of blackness is problematic. You see two different types of feminists, but I see one type of feminist -- well meaning or not -- existing at various points along a single slope of hatred.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:52 PM
3

In order to be an MRA, you pretty much have to largely reject the typical privilege-politics dynamic of feminism and related SJ movements. Well, I would say in order to be a Men's Rights Advocate you must advocate for men's rights. You don't have to reject ideologies if you don't want to -- However Men's Rights doesn't need an ideology. Neither does Women's Rights need any ideology like feminism. Ideologies are pointless and unnecessary wastes of time with no unbiased peer reviewed evidence, so …
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:26 PM
1

...because they're ignorant of why we even have sexual dimorphism. Those that didn't have it, all died off. Monocultures are more vulnerable to viruses and thus become extinct. Variety is not just the spice of life, it's a competitive advantage.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:17 PM
2

Does finding out why women are less likely to run really merit analysis? No. "Why?" is a religious question. Scientists can tell us how a bird sings, what the mechanisms are, when the singing occurs, and even when singing likely emerged in birds. Behavioural sciences can tell us which songs result from what external circumstances and neurologists can even tell us what the internal mental energy states are that give rise to bird song. A cybernetician can even model such information to demonstrate…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:11 AM
5

If I was to have an anonymous twitter handle that didn't reference my name or any pseudo-names, would they be able to find my IP? If I post a link to a website (or image, etc) on a server that I can get logs for, and you view that site/image/etc then I can check the access time against the IP log and get your address. There are other ways to do this, but they all revolve around getting your system to connect to another system they can see the IP address from (a chat client, game, etc). Eg: My fo…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:54 AM
7

I actually think they believe I'm wrong though. You have no evidence to support this claim: There was such a long delay in between the two hits that I don't think either could claim self defense. I personally wouldnt have shot this dumb bitch It seems quite contrary to the belief that they think 'stand your ground' would be applicable. As to the one you responded "lucky she didn't get shot" is quite true regardless of the law. Instead it seems they give no fucks about your personal pedantry. You…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:28 AM
3

np./r/medicine -- By the rules (replace www with np in links) Not that it matters, they don't have a NP CSS configured.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 02:33 AM
-1

The operative word you quote mined out was "usually". It's directly preceding the "can't." I know you're capable of reading since you included the very next word and italicised it. You don't need an explanation; You're trolling for comments, but I will oblige. Consider the man in the comic. It would be abnormal for him to call the woman "Sexist" after her list of requirements -- "shallow" perhaps, or "superficial" if you like, but not "sexist". However it's not uncommon for a guy stating qualiti…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:42 PM
22

And that's why men are more driven to become wealthy and powerful: so they'll finally matter. I've started businesses and had enough money to do whatever I wanted. I've also been homeless. I prefer the middle ground now, where work leaves me ample time for doing the things I really like to do. However, I'm constantly looked down upon by others who know my past for not choosing to compete with myself. They think running a business is easy once you get it big enough. It's not. Most days I would ra…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:37 PM
1

It may be unethical, but I'm going to do that just to see folks destroyed. I mean, think about it: Just one phrase and they literally disintegrate into their constituent particles! I better bring a camera, For Science! In all seriousness, do this: Play any video game with voice chat, on Xbox Live for example. Now, imagine the far worse insults bandied about in a mocking and intimidating tone. Imagine the folks all listening to these things and responding in kind. Now imagine one of those is a bo…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:39 AM
-3

Better than letting the state rase the kids, as the Marxists planned all along with their deeming child care to have no worth, and proclaiming that if you didn't have a "real job" or "your own money" then you were oppressed. Feminism got the elites 2x the workers, and in capitalist societies the economy adjusted to two incomes (same pay @ twice the work = half the pay). Furthermore, marriage ensured that no matter which person earned it, it was "your own money" and parenting is a valuable "real …
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:20 AM
6

There needs to be a campaign to stop it being acceptable for women to slap men. Well, at least let folks show this part: repercussions I mean, folks show murder on TV. I don't think it leads to violence, but at least they show murderers going to jail.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 09:23 AM
2

So, you did the same shit as that bitch. You get the same response. Don't like catching sharks, then stop trolling the waters. Fuck off idiot.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 06:14 AM
3

Did you watch the same video? @1:00 ...said she cut it off because he filed for divorce. [points at audience] She goes, "That'll Teach him!" [bust out laughing] @1:23 I don't know the circumstances; I don't know why he filed for divorce; I don't know what was going on between them. However, I do think it's quite fabulous. [laughter] SHE THINKS IT'S FABULOUS! @1:38 I mean just imagine that thing whizzing around in the disposal. It's, like, Hysterical [laughter] Would it be funny at all if we were…
/r/MensRights18/11/13 05:49 AM
4

there is no real world evidence that such things happen Indeed the term Objectification is insulting to the observer -- It implies a false prevalence of opinion, and that many will come to this same opinion about a group of people based on portrayals of individual people. The null hypothesis hasn't been refuted. If one hypothesises "music videos teach men to view women as objects" then even if they find evidence of men treating a woman as an object due to her portrayal they must also refute the …
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:29 AM
11

Well, considering that feminists fail to disprove the null hypothesis time and again, and thus have zero unbiased peer reviewed evidence for their claims like 'misogynistic patriarchal society' and 'rape culture' (null hypotheses: misogyny isn't prevalent; rape culture isn't responsible for 1st world rapes), yet they teach their non disprovable hypotheses as concrete "Theories" in universities... I'd say it's on par with that level of credibility at least. I agree with you, and I'm glad many MRA…
/r/MensRights17/11/13 01:43 AM
24

Nude Emperor vehemently denies new clothes don't exist. Film at 11.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 01:28 AM
5

Well, if men are devolving, then so are the women their sperm helps produce. Not only that, but the female breeding strategy of apes and most mammalian species is to select the highest quality mates, but the male breeding strategy is typically to spread their seed to as many female mates as possible. Comparing their behaviours directly when they have such different methods of success is counter productive. Indeed, if intelligent men are more selective and opt to have less children and familial b…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:15 PM
1

I agree with your post, and realize you're quoting here, but it's bullshit: Ohio State University professor of psychology, explained: "Sexuality seemed to be the one area where people felt some concern if they didn't meet the stereotypes of a typical man or a typical woman." Seemed is the operative word here. It's a fact that humanity is sexually dimorphic, and descended from apes. The size and shape of male and female brains is noticeably different. The theory that society is the prime cause of…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:18 AM
3

Well, egalitarianism is not mutually exclusive with Men's Rights, indeed it would necessarily include them, and Women's Rights too. The prime cognitive dissonance I find with most lay-people is that they have digested a lot of feminist rhetoric and thus equate Equality and Women's Rights with Feminism. Feminism is not equality. Feminism is an ideology. Women's Rights do not need any ideology, and Men's Rights don't either. If someone says, "If you believe in equality, then you're a Feminist," th…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:54 AM
8

I used to hold doors open for everyone, not just women. I've held doors for the elderly and been berated by a different woman when the old person was a woman -- Even though the elderly person said "Thanks, it's so nice to see young people still have respect." For the dissenting women, I exited then held the door closed momentarily as I retied my shoe, then noted, "It seems you prefer me holding the door open rather than closed." Since the science of studying our sexually dimorphic race shows tha…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:22 AM
8

Well, if you believe the current prevalent rhetoric that women are almost never perpetrators and it's basically completely a crime committed by men, then yes, it's quite pertinent to point out this fact. The 11% and 40% numbers are relevant, but do not speak to the actual volume of the occurrences. Indeed the 91% number can be even more misleading since it means that 91% of youth said that over 50% of the time it's a man. Essentially: Even if men are only slightly more likely to be the customers…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:38 AM
13

I take it you live in Italy.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:17 AM
7

Correct. No rights at all == Equal Rights for All.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 08:01 PM
3

If you don't believe it is relevant, then do you believe that articles critical to Right wing politics has no bearing on Left wing politics? Or are you here just to repeat that "how is this relevant" bullshit we see so frequently?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:45 PM
-1

Having those kind of pictures on the web for all to see can affect your ability to get a job as well as hurt your reputation. Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather fix the problem with society. Images of you in your natural state should never harm your reputation. Harassment? Where is the actual harm? I'm not saying there is none, but IMO you should have to prove harm. Mental harm? No. If we do not hold individuals responsible for their own mental state, then we should hold no one accountable. No o…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 02:55 PM
5

Circumcision is a pointless cosmetic operation. It's in the category of plastic surgery. True, we've ended female genital mutilation, but male genital mutilation is still around. Many women say a cut dick looks nicer; Well, lots of guys like big boobs. So, in the interest of equality should we give newborn girls inflatable breast implants? That way they can avoid the painful operation later in life? No? That's monstrous? It's an unneeded cosmetic procedure, and like any surgery could lead needle…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:46 PM
3

Hmm, well, let's see. The project’s stated goal is “50 percent by 2050” -- to see that in 38 years, women make up half of the world's political and civic leadership. Clinton held up the United States as an example of a country where there is much progress to be made. Currently only 17 percent of Congress is made up by women and only 3 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs are women. “What a waste,” Clinton said to the audience. “The world cannot miss out on the talents and contributions of half the popula…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:59 AM
2

Nope. That hasn't been true for over half a century now. It wasn't true in the 70's when the lying feminists made up the wage gap myth... Indeed there seems to be little to no evidence to support the position that equal work was ever discriminated against based on gender.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:36 AM
1

I think it's sort of ridiculous to think men compete with other men via having hot women. Occams razor would support a simpler slice in that men compete with other men directly in the workplace, and socially via the status money affords them. The goal is to prove you're a better mate than some other man TO WOMEN, not other men. Having a partner the concern is not who has the better woman, but ensuring she still values him over other males. The term "trophy wife" is a misnomer: It would be counte…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 06:15 AM
6

Well, It's not a personal attack, nor do we take it as one. We take it a baseless slanderous attack against all men. They're presenting a classic deflection: Blame the other party of taking things personally. I've never understood why society sees "taking something personally" as wrong. If a generality applies to me, It affects my personhood; Ergo, it's personal. Then again, as George Carlin said: "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:51 AM
92

With regard to the Femininst Frequency bit, I think the whole thing was architected by her (and her feminism boyfriend) to expressly play the biggest victim card for the most profit. Considering what she said she was planning, and what she actually did. Of course such information is absent in most mainstream and videogame "journalism" (scare quotes don't do the irony justice), and instead she's trotted out by "reputable" news sources like 20/20 to help paint men as antagonistic and anti-women. I…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:36 AM
7

Screw "reverse the genders" in this case. Although I'm sure the author would see nothing wrong with political or even job related targets, the real issue is the same faced in entertainment media by the puritans and gender police. They have clown zombies, Nazi zombies, “terrorist” zombies, dog zombies, and even a green zombie named “Rocky” that has Barack Obama’s ears. So, the company is clearly out for some degree of scandalous appeal. Getting bent out of shape over the one female zombie seems a…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:48 PM
6

Men don't want to force or limit abortions. We just want the same rights as women. A woman can terminate the pregnancy, fine, that's her body; I don't want to take that right from her. Men could get vasectomies, but doctors push back against this and even outright refused me the procedure without my significant other's permission -- Should women have to get the father's permission to have an abortion? I don't think so. Men shouldn't face resistance if we want vasectomies. A woman can give a chil…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:41 AM
14

It's bad for the farmers if the cows control their population.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:31 AM
1

First off: It's not just white men that are angry. It's nearly every man I know, regardless of race or creed. Yes, men need to change and adapt to a rapidly shifting world. No. Instead, we can call bullshit. The world isn't rapidly shifting due to torn up gender roles. It's shifting due to technology and outsourcing compounded with the self interest and delusion of many who don the false victim suit to better shift blame. The proper adaptation is not to don the hysteric nonsensical and quite lit…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:02 AM
5

I gotta say, I'm most happy when working hard, burning the midnight oil trying to complete one of my hardware or software engineering hobby projects in a zen like state, all alone, mostly in the dark. I'm down right ecstatic and overjoyed when months or years of hard work pay off and my light and sound based wireless communication protocol sends packets throughout my flat to control the TV channel, start the DVR, or control a simple robot from my PC. I had a quite loving girlfriend once who's on…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:20 AM
9

It's fallacious in that you "can't really hate on her" then say, "she's a cunt". You're Dumb. Additionally, taking advantage of a corrupt system is corrupt.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:56 PM
2

I know feminazi seems to be an attractive term when you're annoyed, No, considering what feminism is: It's always an utterly apt. term. Statements like yours illustrate your ignorance of feminism. Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:38 PM
0

To be fair: All feminsts are liars. There are some confused individuals who don't know what feminism is, and think they are feminists because they wrongly believe feminism is good (indeed, there's no evidence to support that belief). When you've dealt with enough useful idiots who aren't feminists, but call themselves feminist because they believe in equality (and the feminist rhetoric that feminism = equality) then you may come to not label these people as feminists; At such time saying "All fe…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:24 PM
1

Humans are pattern matching creatures. There is a reason you sexually favor those that look similar to yourself. It is a way to preserve the genes. Natural selection did this. It's why you don't find other apes sexy, or whales, etc. sexy. A sibling would share many genes. It would be natural (indeed very common) to find folks who are similar in appearance to a sibling or other close relative (including one's self) attractive. This is genes being selfish, and trying to preserve themselves. Your g…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:28 AM
2

A scientist does not assume Feminism is good without evidence. None of the feminist theories are hypotheses vetted by unbiased peer reviewed evidence. I guess why does the machine work that way, and what is the machine? The machine is immortal corporate entities. It works that way because it gets them more work for less. Feminism has always done this: Double the workforce, the economy adjusts to two incomes, now you get twice as much work for the same price. Once you understand that Feminism is …
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:56 AM
0

I had an easy bake oven, that was the shit. We had a wood burning stove that doubled as the heater for our small farm house in a town w/ population of ~200. The little cakes were damn tasty Home made Cakes, fruit roll-ups, omelettes, crepes, granola, dried fruits, etc. I learned how to be a bad ass cook living in the country with a stay at home mom. Dad taught me how to handle axes and saws and guns, hunt, build model aeroplanes -- And how to trounce mom's recipe for stew w/ the one granny taugh…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:55 AM
12

Except, if it were a women, it would be in the national evening news. There was a story about women's bodies being frisked, implying that the cops just wanted to feel up girls, for fuck's sake. This guy got anally probed. It's actually on the news. We're actually getting some sympathy for men and you pull this "It's not Men's Rights"? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 09:21 PM
18

Right. They could just have detained him and examined his shit after a meal if a rectal probe was warranted.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 09:18 PM
3

Indeed. The question makes begging for sex equivalent to rape...
/r/MensRights03/11/13 10:07 AM
7

Get this through your damn head: Feminism is a set of ideological beliefs. Rights don't need ideologies. Women's rights don't need ideologies. Men's rights don't need ideologies. Furthermore, the Feminist Ideologies are factually wrong and internally inconsistent. Their theories are not backed by unbiased peer reviewed evidence. To a scientist, Feminism is equivalent to Creationism. I can work toward men and women's rights without the bullshit ideology of feminism. Feminism is not Equality. It i…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 09:44 AM
1

The man is statistically more likely to be killed than the girl is to be raped walking the streets. Men should wear a thin layer of cotton body armor and denim jeans if they fell vulnerable. However, note that it may be illegal to feel invincible in public...
/r/MensRights03/11/13 09:39 AM
10

Why are women as violent as men, or more violent than men? Aggression isn't gendered.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:09 AM
2

Additionally: MRM isn't mutually exclusive with Women's Rights. Note that Women's Rights doesn't need to be backed by an ideology, the MRM isn't.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:38 PM
0

This really proves the opposite point than the one you were trying to make... For instance: Modern philosophers realize their work has no bearing on reality unless the theories are backed by unbiased non-self selected observational evidence (seeking validation in cybernetics, neuroscience, and information theory). Feminist philosophers do not seek to be disproved. They simply adhere to whatever ideology / epistemology / etc. without seeking to disprove their standpoints. It's illogical to argue …
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:28 PM
0

Feminism is the radical notion that hypotheses don't need evidence before becoming Theories or made into Laws.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:14 PM
4

Lots of talk about ceilings, nothing about cellars... Many American women today are living shorter lives than their mothers, especially those with less education and lower incomes, which Clinton described as a historical reversal in life expectancy. Protip: Working harder means you'll live shorter lives. I mean, it's presented as if this isn't a direct result of pushing women into the workplace, and some injustice against women instead. What a crock. More wage gap conspiracy theory BS: "Even in …
/r/MensRights02/11/13 11:08 PM
7

Note that the all male government didn't grant you the right to vote until more women wanted to vote than didn't. Yep, lots of gals didn't want to risk being drafted. The biggest opposition to women's suffrage was other women... I find your view of history very revisionist, and well, wrong. There was a lot of controversy and valid concerns with granting women the right to vote. Traditionally a married couple was a legal union -- A singular entity which got one vote. It wasn't just people labelin…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:05 PM
2

Contradictions like this make it hard to take people seriously around here. Get bent idiot. Mens Rights has no unifying ideology behind it. No one belief guides the minds of the MRM. If you're too ignorant to consider contrasting viewpoints as healthy for discourse then go back to your single-minded totalitarian feminist paradise.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:48 PM
9

Everyone can participate in Movember. A female colleague who, noticing my new facial fuzz, asked about Movember and wore a great fake mustache on the last day that put mine to shame. It was great. Her beard brought more awareness to my coworkers than my own. I'm hoping to see more bearded ladies and gentlemen this year.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:38 PM
1

As a cyberneticist, that is the future I work towards daily... Don't hold your breath waiting for millions of years of evolutionary pressures to be lifted from the organic creatures inhabiting the planet. The ones perceived as more "fit" for procreation? Yeah, there's a reason those are the ones that get treated nice. It's called Evolution. You have to become cognizant of your own biases before you can avoid them. Humans do not like admitting that they can not control their thoughts -- Which is …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 12:01 PM
1

You don't think that evolution, which caused things like milk giving breasts to form on women, and sperm evacuating penis shapes + oversensitivity after ejaculation to form in men (maximizes removal of other sperm and proliferation of subject's own) -- You don't think that evolution can have complex effects and that instead brains are somehow immune from influence of the genes that form them? You don't think that since procreation is of prime importance to genetic survival that genes wouldn't ev…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:14 AM
1

I'm a cyberneticist. I call bullshit. Everything flows. You tweak one knob it affects the others.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:07 AM
3

We just voted on this issue. 75+% want to keep the mandatory national service including me. 100% of slave owners want to keep slaves. Your vote is moronic. If the citizens do not believe in their government's actions they should have the right to not participate in the wars they cause. Forcing men to fight in wars they don't believe in is EXACTLY how you destroy a nation. If your country can not rally troops from able bodied volunteers to defend it in times of need, then it is not a legitimate g…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:56 PM
12

I always mentally replace "take responsibility for" with "bear the burden of". It means the same thing, but puts things in the correct context. Responsibility is somehow seen as prestigious, when in reality it's a burden... A beast of burden does not a man make.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:47 PM
35

I think the tradcon is correct. You don't become a Man until you assume responsibility for someone... That someone, is themselves. What's going on is that Men are starting to "man up" and taking responsibility for themselves, and it's scaring the shit out of the corporations and governments who've been exploiting men's willingness to sacrifice. Marriage has been commercialized and capitalized on so much that it's too expensive a delusion to participate in. Whenever someone tells me to "man up", …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:39 PM
3

Orwell would be indignant.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:37 AM
7

The trick is that they defined what "violent" and "socially dominant" means. It's bullshit. Is it violent to throw dishes against walls, key a car, or just physically harm people? Is it socially dominant to attempt to passive aggressively influence every social situation to your benefit, or just be protective? They set out to prove something then did. If I step on a crack and look for backs breaking, I'll find some. I can prove that stepping on cracks is correlated strongly with breaking backs, …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:41 AM
1

Protip: Psychology and Psychiatry are not sciences. If you want to learn about human behaviors and even treating them, look into neuroscience and cybernetics... In the end it all (even philosophy) stems from information theory. As we gain more ability to actually watch brains work in real time (FMRI, electrodes, nanotube electrodes tapping individual neurons, etc) we're able to discover the actual causes of behavior. Want proof your PSY101 book is full of bullshit? Just ask: "Prove It" or "Where…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:33 AM
-3

So they can play the victim card?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:55 AM
1

We should invent a different word to replace it then. Crunt?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:52 AM
2

"You Shouldn't" WRONG you failed, silly fool. You don't get to dictate "should". Unlike your bogus rule of thumb I am a sentient being. I get to evaluate such things on the fly, depending on the environment and actions of others at that specific time -- A recommendation can't do this. I walk a fast pace, I have long legs. I refuse to slow down just so I don't overtake some frightened females. I acknowledge them and say hello, even though I've got nine times the chance of being brutalized on the …
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:45 AM
5

"The social construct of masculinity is seen by feminism as problematic because it associates males with aggression and competition, and reinforces patriarchal and unequal gender relations." Except, aggression isn't gendered... Neither is competition. Girls and boys just compete amongst themselves differently. If you see the traits you self selected as being male in nature as problematic, then you value it less than the other non-problematic traits you self selected as not masculine. Correct? I …
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:59 AM
-1

What about writing an article about a victory? Oh I guess that's not "winning" either... Hey, just FYI, you re-framed 'losing' to 'winning', you Orwellian moron.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:41 AM
4

Well, I'm a scientist. Unlike feminists, I believe the term you're looking for is Hypothesis. Until the legwork is done to prove the hypothesis of male disposability, and disprove the null hypothesis of social male disposability not being the prime motivator of men's sacrifice -- Say, for instance, a satisfaction of being needed and appreciated for the larger and stronger body, or deeply ingrained biological instinct / risk reward system that benefits and accelerates survival of the fittest... e…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 01:33 PM
6

She also wants to rush because men value youth and beauty (an indicator of fertility), while women value social (protector/provider) status -- Yes this is a generalization; Holds true for most ape species on average though. The distinguished accomplished man can be voted the sexiest (alpha) man of the year into his 50's. This is typically not the case for women; Note that women are typically infertile at such age... Quick! Seal the deal, I'm not getting any younger, and you're getting more attra…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 01:03 PM
0

Honestly, I think inserting your hand/a medical tool into a womans vagina unannounced is closer to rape than "I changed my mind about the consent I gave yesterday" What about peeking your head out of a vagina, then screaming bloody murder at her for the next 18 years? Teach baby girls not to rape.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:49 PM
2

Me t-too. Th-They told me I had to let them c-cut me open and invade my most private of internal places, or I would die. I didn't have a choice. If I wanted to live, I would have to get open heart surgery. It was against my will! They even made me pay them afterwards! As if I enjoyed them violating me!?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:46 PM
1

I am. I firmly believe men should leave the gender-begging to those more capable of doing so. I also believe it would be very interesting to divide the handouts along gender. Let's let taxes collected from men only go back into helping men or humanity in general, but not specifically women's programs; Likewise for women's taxes not going towards men. I hypothesize that would turn out heavily in favor of men and terrible for women. If this proves true, then we must ask ourselves: Is it right to m…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:34 PM
9

It's not the crooked cops you have to worry about, those are a small fraction of cops. What's the bigger problem is that the other cops "protect their own" regardless of what's right. Feminism is fascism.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:14 AM
1

Wow, they've deleted damn near EVERY comment that had anything to do with correcting the bullshit they spouted.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 04:01 PM
3

I came to it the same way. The things feminists said caused my rational mind to examine their statements. There were far too many "X happens, Y happens, Z is bad" followed directly by "because of M"; It seemed like the all too familiar mental gymnastics that the pseudo scientific play with their emotional appeals. The causal link claimed with no evidence to support it. Additionally that they should have a target to destroy instead of only rights to further raised an eyebrow, reminding me of the …
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:44 AM
1

... it's almost like exhibitionism is a thing.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:15 AM
3

I do declare!
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:44 AM
6

Here's a simple and powerful campaign idea from UN Women using real suggested search terms from Google's autocomplete feature. What about men? Oh, right, it's just sensationalist garbage. The leaders generally want to suppress those who could upset power balances in their countries or discourse in media. They'll leverage whatever they can to meet those ends. Notably, UN recently made a play to take control of the Internet governance in the wake of NSA PRISM leaks... They also want to further cen…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:22 AM
-2

Monkeys mating. Monkeys mating everywhere.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:14 AM
2

I refer to myself as a gender algebraist. I believe in equalities that are actually equal. Eg: When a feminist condemned my game development club for only awarding one women the technical achievement award, and none for technical excellence, I pointed out that everyone had an equal opportunity, but due to the fact that women typically don't like the hard, thankless, non-status-rewarding work of developing indie games as a hobby (games which likely will never see the light of day beyond other ind…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:28 AM
1

The son of Oedipus... This does not bode well for anyone involved.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:04 AM
16

It's not the same as Men's Sheds, but Maker Spaces and Hacker Spaces (and to a lesser degree Gamejams) are also great for connecting with men. Contrary to popular belief men are typically better at picking up on non-verbal communication skills... Women communicate sexual attraction thus. Men may not feel the need to verbally expound on our feelings to connect on emotional levels as much as women. It's not that men are typically emotionally disconnected, they just connect in different ways. There…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 06:47 AM
0

You throw that bigot word around a lot. You also tried to construct a straw man by asking questions then assuming the answer was yes, and concluding things based on inferences based on your assumptions. Are you? ... which also implies... You've concocted. This paragraph is weird, see? You ask a question that's more of an accusation, then rolls into conspiratorial territory about inventing imaginary spectrums. No, it's called a generalization. It means, in the average case, or general case, somet…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 04:44 AM
3

If you want to catch a fish, you will need a worm on a hook, or a net. A human mind will see the net coming, and they pick at their food for thought before chomping down. If you want to catch a mind, you must use a hook that doesn't pretend to be a worm.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:29 AM
1

The Honey Badger's Link is usually in their Lowbar. Would you like to know more?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:10 AM
8

I don't believe in the social construct of grammar. /s
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:06 AM
1

I feel for you. Been there many times. The way I always frame it is against murder... Murder is far more brutal, and more prevalent, and affects men more. Be prepared with some statistics to back you up and especially point out that when feminists in the CDC erase male victims and female perpetrators of rape, they encourage creating more female victims... Most rapists have been raped or abused themselves. You can't end a cycle of abuse by focusing on one side.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:43 AM
1

hah, I replied to the thread with a link to said 20/20 segment prior to father's day, and explained that scientists believe that dads are dumb, and pointed out the anti-male trend of ABC. Of course it got deleted. Doubleplus fuck those Orwellian bastards.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:21 AM
32

/b/ AKA: The Internet Hate Machine. I get rape and death threats for giving away free indie games there... Of course these threats are so common from 4chan's /b/, it's basically a term of endearment for one to say they'll kill and rape you, your family, pets, and loved ones; In the most gruesome of ways. Hell, they actually liked her more than most folks they encounter, from what I can tell: 8/10, Masterful troll is masterful.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:07 AM
2

It solves the problem of looking for legal ways to punish dissenters of the Marxists who leverage the feminist identity politics to fulfill the Marxist potential. They're not even hiding it anymore... The feminist theory of Kyriarchy says that it's the ruling class which is doing the oppressing. It's the communist manifesto 2.0. Feminism has always been a Marxist movement. This has all happened before, and it will all happen again. The fools will let the state amass power in the guise of good, t…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:45 AM
1

Nature can not be fooled, therefore Science is intolerant of unevidenced claims and emotional appeals. It follows then that Scientists are intolerant of ideological bullshit.... This shall not stand! We will not tolerate heretics! Let their intolerance to water be their undoing. Drown The Scientists and Burn their Man Made Magics!
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:35 AM
31

Ah yes, the death of spontaneity. Fascism gains power not with dissent, boos and hisses, but with refreshing applause. Tear that shit down. A kiss is not physical assault. You can always say, "Stop". Perhaps it's just me, but I like surprises. I like hormone fueled ripping of clothes off. What we have is the option to say "No" at any moment. What thinking like these posters give is not protection of your personal space, but a dumbing down of the body language. A sterilization of that very human …
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:21 AM
1

Correction: Just like ready anything anywhere ever.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:02 PM
3

the stereotypical man isn't particularly rationally tempered but is rather brutish/jockish. Well, for one, prove it. In my experience the typical male is neither a brute nor a jock nor a scientist. Even in your brutes, battling in war or mock war on football and rugby fields you will see the rational logic of strategic suffering to achieve a goal. You will see the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few. That is nothing if not rational, yet you paint these brutes as irrational... What…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:20 PM
2

So, what you're saying is that people who fall victim to logical fallacies will not be receptive to any challenge to their preconceived notions. I agree, however, note that there is no evidence to back your 10% vs 90% claim. The poster may not be effective for all target audiences, but your assertion assumes a heterogeneous target audience of irrational individuals. This would be ridiculous, of course, since you can't expect to convince an irrational / illogical person of anything (ergo: you wou…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:09 PM
2

Some once snickered at slaves who wanted to be free. Know this: The law is rarely ever just, and almost certainly wrong when seen through the eyes of the future.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:49 PM
2

0.000618891461 cubic yards
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:48 AM
2

gender equality and the breaking down of stereotypes Well, I agree with you on all but the stereotypes front. I'm no traditionalist, don't get me wrong, but the facts of reality and biology are responsible for some "tropes" or stereotypes. Eg: A big brave man breadwinner shouldn't be a stereotype that folks try to "break down". IMO, no should be limited to a stereotype even if they desired to fill that role; It's OK to fill the stereotypical role if that's your choice. Many feminists shamed wome…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:46 AM
-12

Well, just because it looks like a woman, and was born a woman doesn't mean it identifies as a woman. So, woman-identifying folks is basically the only way to clarify you're talking about the folks who want to be identified as female... I think it's all fucking stupid. The ancient Greeks and Japanese didn't have this gender disambiguation problem. They simply didn't attribute sex to dominance, sacrifice, nurturing, appearance, heroism, etc. By adopting a different gender label you're trying to f…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 08:03 PM
2

I've been nearly killed. I agree: Rape is not worse than death. I don't have any evidence that rape-wishers are the same as those who would over inflate the rape trauma and stats... What I do have evidence for is that demanding funding to end female Rape and Domestic Violence are primarily the tools of Marxists. There are no Feminists. There are useful idiots and Marxists, and if you don't watch out, that overarching ideology will try to hijack the MRM too (when they fail to umbrella it under Fe…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:42 AM
7

Yep. It would be as ignorant to think if a woman gets wet it means she wants it. Interesting that male victims get asked "were you aroused", but not females... I had assumed females were grilled over basically the same stuff as men; I should have known better. Either nix the question or ask it of both sexes?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:35 AM
8

Always the language... "Rape" is the word that many people treat as worse than death, it's what gets attention, not "assault" or even "sexual assault"... IMO, we should get rid of the word "rape". "Rape" doesn't exist. There is only sexual assault. Note that the distinction is made so that one can be downplayed or played up. "Rape" is a sexist term. Additionally, I have been "raped" (sexually assaulted). I have also been beaten to within an inch of my life. I would rather be "raped" again than b…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:07 AM
4

Well, that's what's called Journalistic Integrity. See, you don't want to put it front and center that your news agency was made a fool of by the liar, so you downplay the stuff that illustrates how sensational the headlines are in order to preserve the appearance of integrity. Of course, that's just a foolish way to look at it. Think of all the controversy if they instead were outraged at being made as fools, and made a page 1 called out for folks NOT to use rape accusations this way since it m…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:30 AM
4

You poor rape victim... /s
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:24 AM
2

Damn, women get all the good shit, as usual. Easier to get drunk (have to buy less booze). Better and more orgasms. That's why I'm an atheist. I can't believe in a feminist god.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:22 AM
9

"Men drink responsibly"? "Drink men responsibly"?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:17 AM
-2

See but here's the thing, you, as the majority, don't get to decide what people should or shouldn't be offended by. No one can keep you from taking offense. You must take the offense yourself. You are the only one responsible for your own fucking actions. Nothing I say can actually offend you. If that hurts you or anyone else's feelings, they can get bent for all I care. Like you said, I can't decide what people should or shouldn't be offended by. I don't get to dictate your fucked up feelings, …
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:42 AM
3

Folks like you make me sick. Wouldn't matter if he said: "I love kitties" You could get all offended about bestiality. Fuck off with your PC nonsense. I have both lesbian and gay friends that when I'm trouncing them at a card game frequently shout, "Ah, that's gay." or say the very same "fuck this gay earth" statement. I've got straight friends that say, "Well fuck me!" It marginalizes no one. That's identity politics you're spouting, and it's as disgusting as any censorship.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:36 AM
3

"I'll be back" -the 90's
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:29 AM
2

When you erase a file, the system merely removes the file name from a list. The file is still there. It can be recovered if you once again count it in the list before its body is overrun by others. Just like the erased file, men and deeds erased by such protesters still exist. Sometimes it takes a massive audit of the entire system to rediscover what's lost, but so long as you take action quickly the damage can be mitigated. That's why it's important not to ignore false accusations as baseless. …
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:15 AM
2

Yeah, sadly, I think even in these terms men don't matter to most women. If you want them to care, you have to say shit like, "Your son will face ___" Far more frequently they care about kids.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:13 PM
1

phpBB really really sucks. Not only that, it's swiss cheese from a security standpoint. Source: Moderated a games forum that had some drama over bans, and a script kiddie repeatedly hacked it despite all patches being applied until we migrated to MyBB. It's been hacked too, along with other boards running PHP backends, but not nearly as frequently as phpBB. I've since left that community for bigger, better, things. Advice: DO NOT USE PHP, the language itself breeds insecurity. I run a little kno…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 04:56 PM
2

The distinction is purely in your own damn mind. Allow me to demonstrate: "It's a boy, don't feed it!"
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:38 PM
5

If you're offending the religious and not the nonreligious, chances are you're doing something right.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:36 PM
3

Hell, if that's what does it for you, see two doctors.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:45 AM
7

Also point out female and minority privileges, like scholarships which exclude white males, government assistance for housing and child care, the fact that women can drop unwanted babies off at safe houses, no questions asked -- no child support, but men who have no say in whether or not the child will be born are required to pay child support for 18 years, or face jail. The privilege of not dying in war -- Women are kept from the front lines where most of the death happens...
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:32 AM
2

You would prefer Catcher and Pitchers then?
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:27 AM
10

can't be studied scientifically. Dubious. Say I hypothesize a change to school systems that will increase performance of boys, and enrollment in college. Then we gather information about schools, make the change in a few schools. Then examine the schools again. This is the scientific method. It's how you apply science. Are you trying to say this can not be done? The same goes for reducing rapes and abuse of men. Science is not male specific, of course. We could apply such rational methods to wom…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:04 AM
2

The simple fact is, if you were living a hundred years ago in a society where women were by default considered inferior, and you were trying to win equal rights for women, it makes perfect sense to call that movement "feminism". Or, maybe if you were a Marxist, and were applying Marxism to Gender to get twice as many workers while not freeing the family to choose who gets to raise the kids, you might take the word Communist, and make it sound more Feminine so the females you're trying to convinc…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 04:59 AM
3

What's interesting is when you look to our ape relatives and realize that there is no such thing as homosexuality or heterosexuality, just sexuality. Then you read about the Ancient Greeks and realize the modern sexual divisionism didn't always exist. In nature there seems to be a smooth range of sexuality among us and our ape kin, with individuals actually shifting along the scale, not firmly fixed into one place as their "natural" default. It's interesting. How much sex between a man and woman…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:08 PM
3

Fortunately when any reasonable person who gets pissed off about the MRM and actually looks into this "vile hateful group" they discover that the well coordinated intense propagandists are the vile ones. That wall of shame was designed to keep people ignoring us. Now people are taking notice, and it's making those against us look quite ridiculous. First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -- Gandhi. We've been dealing with those first two. Get ready for th…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:49 PM
2

UM agreed to change its sexual assault policies as part of a resolution agreement signed in May that concluded a year-long federal investigation into the university’s handling of sexual misconduct allegations. The 47-page resolution agreement and findings letter—labeled a “blueprint” for campus sexual harassment policies nationwide—requires UM to take a series of burdensome, confusing, and intrusive steps in an effort to address the real problem of sexual assault on campus. Fucking Feminazis. Tr…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:25 PM
2

Same height. I was the shortest kid in my class, until I grew nearly a foot in a year and a half -- got vertical stretch marks even. Then I was the tallest kid in the class for years. I got picked on for being a "runt", and various other names. Then I got picked on for being tall and clumsy (adjusting to my new hardware size) -- Folks often said I had flunked so much that's why I was so much taller than everyone... Years after graduating from school, a girl said I was short. I laughed at her and…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:51 PM
3

One issue does not negate another, it just means you have two issues. It often means there is only one issue. Let's consider the issue of men being raped and domestically abused. Most rapists and abusers have been raped and abused. Feminists erase male victims of rape and abuse, and re-define rape so as to erase female perpetrators. Thus, the Feminists create more female victims in the next cycle of abuse by ignoring the male victims. That's how sexism hurts people. What will focusing on female …
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:46 PM
1

The mall does not dictate constitutional law, such you can not forefit. I agree, you may likely lose your job if you go against the rules. My advice is start looking for another job (actually, I never stop looking for jobs, ever; That way you always have leverage: "Well, I don't have to work here, I have choices" instead of being afraid of getting fired). Get something else lined up just in case. Record away. Make a copy. Take it to the HR, and if they do the cover-up route or fire you, post it …
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:15 PM
2

You've been linked to the refs... What you may not know is that Never Married Women have made the same as Never Married Men since at least the 70's.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:03 AM
6

Lineage of Feminism Marxist Communism Marxist Feminism = Marxist Communism applied to Gender Radical Feminism = Marxist Feminism + Patriarchy Theory 3rd Wave Feminism = Radical Feminism + Patriarchy Hurts Men Too + Claiming ownership of all gender issues + Kyriarchy Theory (Communist Marxism: "Elites are oppressive, rise up proletariat"). Communists won the bullshit war by duping idyllic fools, in the guise of Feminism... just not the Cold War. Protip: Instead of winning the equal right for pare…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 03:10 AM
1

I agree with that. If I were a gambling man, in this situation I would explain my view, and If they didn't seem receptive to then I'd say why and break it off... However, I'm not a gambling man. I mean, if you like those odds, then chances are there are girls out there you don't have to convince in the first place, eh?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:35 AM
4

You mean Raping Mother Nature?! Didn't even think if she wanted to keep any of that atomic stuff secret, Men just peeked under her clothes and stared right at her jiggly orbs.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:22 AM
0

Makes no sense because, well, I'm white. As a white person I have more Neanderthal DNA... Think about that. My light skinned ancestors LOVED dark skinned people... Literally! My dark skinned ancestors love the light skinned folk too. Now, those other folks who stayed dark, well, I'm not saying their ancestors were racist, but if we're going by the DNA, they mingled less with different lookin' folks...
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:17 AM
1

Why the gendered distinction? Rape is rape.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:29 AM
2

While I agree with the overall sentiment of your statements you are egregiously wrong on several points due to broad assumptions made without evidence: Modern porn is almost uniformly aggressive and degrading, often to both sexes. Prove it. The burden of proof is on you. Now also prove that watchers of said porn: Adopt a belief that is degrading to women. Adopt this belief because they watched the porn. Further you now need to define both 'aggressive' and 'degrading' in objective terms instead o…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 06:57 AM
3

I'm not saddened. I'm angry. The majority of rapists and abusers have been raped and abused themselves. Cycles of abuse exist. What happens when feminists erase female perpetrators and male victims is that they help create more future female and male victims... And that really fucking pisses me off!
/r/MensRights30/09/13 06:37 AM
0

In the spring I savor hot coffee in my wet dew strewn yard taking voyeuristic delight in witnessing time and again the sun rise and thrust its heated rays into mother nature's frigid darkness, pumping her steadily into heated frenzied summer downpours, and driving the song birds into wild misogynistic whistles.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:43 AM
62

Misandry is on Facebook. To connect with Misandry, sign up for Facebook today.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:08 AM
2

Personally, I don't give a damn about hair... However, 3 of my 4 closest male friends are more concerned with having a bad hair day and being attractive than in having a day where too many women show them unwanted attention. So, based on this anecdotal evidence I don't find it hard to believe that women can be equal to men in this regard. Maybe it's just because the people I know aren't irrationally terrified of the opposite sex?
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:56 AM
2

Gendered Dorms?! That's Sexist!
/r/MensRights30/09/13 03:32 AM
7

Female Privilege? Nah, can't possibly exist... Betcha if they just shot a single woman instead the story would be about Islamic extremists' rampant anti-female stances resulting in murder of women. I guess, "The Patriarchy Kills Men Too." Noam Chomsky can give you some insight into why some atrocities are seemingly under reported by the news. It goes well beyond sexism into the realm of manufacturing consent.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 03:24 AM
21

You can't even just leave This. So many times, this. She puts our small child in the bath. She's still screaming at me in front of him, over the water rushing since I'm in the next room -- We've discussed this many times before as being harmful to him, and now he's screaming too. I take the opportunity to just get away for a moment, walk around the block, think without all the shouting... "What did you do wrong now? Watching the big game?", asks my neighbor who's watering their yard. I honestly …
/r/MensRights30/09/13 01:56 AM
17

Well, the up / down vote stats are fuzzed by reddit as a spam countermeasure -- So spammers can't tell if their votes have been silently banned, or if their stuff is getting past some filter. So, while it's not beyond the realm of possibility that some people would downvote this, a number of the down votes (possibly all of them) are due to the vote fuzzing.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:05 PM
2

Yeah, not this instance, but other feminist protests in the past bade me look into the issues they were rallying against, discover only accusatory language, lack of evidence, and perpetuation of falsehoods... As a scientist, their calls to action, lacking any evidence such is called for, threatens core tenets of my profession -- completely rejecting and subverting the scientific method; Including research into actual domestic violence. Most rapists and abusers have been raped and/or abused thems…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:02 PM
1

Fine, leave them to the Earth. We men must join forces with the Space Babies and dominate the Universe with our Big Black Phallic Monoliths!
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:57 PM
6

From your first link: Gay men have invented new technology, built cities, researched cures for disease, made profound contributions to the arts, literature and philosophy, excelled at athletics and participated wholly in every aspect of the development of civilization as we know it. But of course, they did not do these things because they were gay. They did these things because they were men. Solving problems and making advances is what men do, and there is no evidence to suggest that gay men ar…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:23 PM
2

Two wrongs don't make a right... OK, then why are you against pointing out hypocrisy? Isn't that hypocritical? Because, that's what the post is about. You inserted all the "circlejerk" BS to take a high-ground via applying a sweeping ad hominem. Then you descended into utter foolishness. How else do you think we'll get the labeling to stop if not by pointing out where the current rampant anti-sexist labeling is actually sexist? Moron.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:24 PM
87

If someone is hurting you don't attack them. You do if the fact of the way he was hurt threatens notions core to your bullshit ideology... Unless you're not a feminist; In that case you simply re-evaluate your beliefs, like any rational minded individual would.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:02 PM
17

Or, more correctly: Penis is a sensitive region, thus a vulnerability... Otherwise, she'd be hitting him in the eye, eh? Think about it: She feels wronged by the penis, so she attacks it. She's given license to do so by those who would marginalize male domestic abuse: Consider the gender reversal. It wouldn't be socially acceptable for a man to attack a vagina for cheating on him. Occam's Razor would tend to suggest that marginalizing male victims of domestic abuse would be a more likely cause. …
/r/MensRights23/09/13 09:53 AM
-5

Well, if you weren't born there, that might be OK. However, what happens in Vegas is supposed to stay in Vegas... and you clearly have not stayed in Vegas. Hmm. I wonder what would happen if we applied this phrase more places, like to the billboard: "What happens in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom". Wow, sensible from a privacy standpoint, but in regard to domestic abuse it's some scary shit.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 09:45 AM
4

In the end, only you can define what you believe, and everyone else can go fuck themselves. No. This is not true, not for everyone. I'm a scientist. I don't get to just sit around making claims like the billboard is the result of "gender stereotypes that render a 'weak' woman attacking a "strong" man as inherently absurd." I don't have evidence for that. I can't claim it's true. I can't claim it's true that women are perceived as valuable and men devalued as the cause for this sign, without evid…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 09:25 AM
2

I don't want to do this: There are two styles of gender roles- rigid and fluid. Prove it. You have no evidence for this theory. It is as unfounded as feminism. Rigid gender roles are what we refer to as traditional. The word is "stereotypical", not "rigid". Bachelor is a gender role, so is Old Maid. So is "dirty old man". You see how the roles aren't rigid, but merely typically fit into stereotypes? This is because I'm self selecting the criteria. Let me self select another criteria: I can say, …
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:53 AM
1

So are you saying that the male role is in fact imposed on men by women? Yes. That's why the males of most species expend all that energy growing and maintaining excessive beautiful plumage, large plates of skin, manes, etc, etc. The female of the species is responsible for these silly male traits. They are not advantageous except to a female's aesthetic. The male's role is dictated by the female of the species.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 06:11 AM
4

Ah, that would be the 'feminist' part.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:33 AM
3

I'd live to a ripe old age. You see? Without worry of going to jail for protecting my property there wouldn't be much keeping me from doing so... Word gets out, and the risk/rewards aren't going to be good for taking advantage of folks. Considering that criminals are a minority, your fears are unfounded.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:32 AM
7

Well, maybe not rape, but abuse! That's why it's called "hitting on them"...
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:04 AM
6

Link to PDF Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Statute is to: ... e) Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia. ♪♬ One of these things is not like the others! ♩♫ Tolerance == Silencing anti-ideological speech. Wow, I'm not sure you can get much more Orwellian than this.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:47 PM
23

Yeah but that leaves a shitty situation. Life's a bitch. Grow up. It pressures the women into having an abortion if she is not not financially stable enough to have the kid which is likely if she is not at least middle class with all the time off mothers have to take. No it does not. See also: Giving the kid up for adoption or dropping the kid off at a safe harbor approved fire station. "Maternity Leave" exists. You're a fucking troll. Your course of action is anti poor. You just broke my Orwell…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:08 PM
0

It's a lousy qualifier. It means "all women in my experience are A". The subtext basically says "it's my opinion that all women are A". First off. It means, "all women I have experienced". If there is subtext it would be "I haven't experienced all women". If you choose to dig between the lines you can pull whatever shit you want out from between them. Note that such fool's shit comes from your own mind, however.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:37 AM
1

Pillow talk, however...
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:35 AM
-3

Agreed, one does not absolutely indicate the other; one does imply the other. You're being a pseudo-intellectual twit. To say not-guilty does not imply the other as lying you are actually giving the feminist the very room they need to classify all dismissed rape accusations, even those dismissed in court, as potentially real rape instances gone ignored. You must realize the average person is only somewhat rational, but still largely deals in absolutes. It's is perfectly rational to apply this th…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:59 PM
3

Objectifried, you mean. Served up like grade A USDA beef, stamped with seals of approval (or disapproval) and everything.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:44 PM
-5

Protip: You're not supposed to do shit for anyone. By law, doors are mandated to be openable even by disabled folks. Take your over-broad guilt trip of manners and stick it up your ass. How's them for manners, mate? I'm done being a good little boyscout. That fella I "should" hold the door for? Yeah, he's part of the problem too. Likely won't hold it for me. That guy in the wheelchair? I know a few of 'em, they don't want or need special treatment either. The thing is: There's no way to tell whi…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:31 PM
-7

"I need Men's Rights because I'm a Man, and I should have some damn rights too, eh?"
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:20 PM
3

If you don't know what Poe's Law is, then see yourself right off the Internet too, newb. Note that unlike a Nazi fuckwit like you, I didn't call for you to be involuntarily banned. Get bent, hard. Case and point: Remember, if you criticise her, you are exactly like those few dicks that sent her death threats/rape threats. If not sarcastic, this could be just mater of fact stating that you will, indeed, be seen as antagonistic as the death threat spewing trolls for merely criticizing her and poin…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 04:03 AM
1

Underage? Swap the species. Confused puppies sometimes like to have sex with humans. It's still illegal. For some messed up reason, most folks will show sympathy towards a puppy dog before a human male.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:36 PM
7

physiological by-product of male orgasms. Bullshit. Women wouldn't accept men sticking it in there if it didn't feel good. What kind of idiots does it take to NOT realize that cavewomen can bash cave men in the head with rocks in their sleep? That wouldn't be very good for the species if it didn't feel nice, eh? If you're going down the insane highway, why not shit out the other side of your ass and claim that men's orgasms are the byproduct of female orgasms? Men are just required to ejaculate …
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:18 PM
7

I wonder what kind of people don't masturbate and why? Terrorist Sympathizers!
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:16 PM
8

I mean i might be wrong, but it makes perfect sense to me and is the easiest explanation that i could find for such deplorable behavior. Are you a feminist? Because, scientists like me don't just run with the first easiest explanation that comes to mind... A single data point does not support "social standard from stupid macho culture". If you're rational, level up. Here's an even easier answer: If men are shamed for hitting women, Then perhaps some come up with self delusions to mentally combat…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:13 PM
5

Thus feeding the gears of the Planning Fallacy. The best managers are capable of filling in for the best of their workers that they manage. Doing otherwise is commonplace but fundamentally corrupt and inefficient any way you slice it.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:53 AM
14

Of course not, just that such jobs are contingent upon: Impressing young naive minds -- the young are increasingly cynical of masculinity being the problematic cause of violence. Staffing Women's Shelters -- domestic violence and homelessness among men and boys is gaining awareness; That means Human Shelters or Men's shelters (and replacing the sexist woman shelter staff). Gender Inequality -- input( w / m )% == output( w / m )%; in the workplace, so that's equality... Nearly everywhere else wom…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:35 AM
2

Life will find a way!
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:59 AM
16

Hmm. Urine contains ammonia, which is somewhat reactive. A bit of catalyst to get the nitrogen fixed out of the air, perhaps the small battery powering the display can provide the heat and spark. Eureka! We can keep the women folk from selling or lending their pregnancy proofs! "This Pregnancy Test will Self Destruct in 5 .. 4 .. 3 .. 2 .."
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:55 AM
3

So every single person on the planet lies about all things? Absolutely Not!
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:49 AM
13

The only way to win, is not to play... fair.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:38 PM
1

Imagine what a raptor would look and behave like if the ground dwellers hadn't become extinct. Might not have looked too different than your average human. However, they'd have had much longer to adapt so they'd feel superior. Could have even developed technology to mask their nature and blend in. Now imagine a Feminist. "Clever girl," indeed.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:54 PM
7

Both conservatism and journalism have, at their core, a principle or principles worth something to a free and open society. Ahem. Perhaps you missed the 70's and 80's where it was proved that journalism has no more principals than pushing their agenda? Educate yourself with some Mandatory Chomsky: Manufacturing Consent Unmasking such Orwellian BS is very apt info for those of the MRM. Protip: The same slanted media owned by corporate interests harms and slanders men, and will continue to do so b…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:22 PM
5

If Feminism were Fox: "Feminism, the most trusted ideology by women of the world."
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:13 PM
16

The question remains: Had those poor boys been better treated in school, would they have felt the need to shoot up the place?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:53 PM
7

Golly, Ms. Clever. I never looked at it like that before. It must be nice to be so thoroughly brainwashed by unreality. Thanks for the enlightenment. Beev and I are going to the monocle shop to get fitted for top-hats so we'll look like proper gentlemen while raiding dad's porn stash. Protip: If you ever become a parent, the best advice is to never grow up -- Kids raise themselves, that's why humans still exist despite not coming with instructions for millions of years.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:45 PM
12

Protip: The proverbial crack is just below the back.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:39 PM
5

Your username has me imagining a Montage. Except instead of improving things over a long time represented by short clips, I imagine it's more like a Fail Compilation. Instead of emerging changed and more capable at the end we see the Idiocracy demanding more funds to make more failure montages.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:30 PM
3

I was floating around r/feminism the other day and saw someone with a sig saying "Marxist feminist," what does this term mean? Marxist Feminism was the very first Feminism. Comunism + Fem = Feminism. Wiki:Marxist Feminism Gayle Rubin, ... first rose to prominence through her 1975 essay "The Traffic in Women: Notes on the 'Political Economy' of Sex", in which she coins the phrase "sex/gender system" and criticizes Marxism for what she claims is its incomplete analysis of sexism under capitalism, …
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:46 PM
44

Awesome. Just this morning I was debating with an on-the-fence "feminist" about men being blamed simply for being men. She assured me that I was deluded and that I was just repeating "misogynistic" lies about feminism. We're already past the point in such discussion where I show her that "Radical Feminism" was just a label to distinguish the Marxist Feminism from Marxist Feminism + Patriarchy Theory, i.e., "radical" means "patriarchy theory", not man hater. (ah, but then whence comes the man hat…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:19 AM
7

Not to mention the deletionists and the fiefdoms ruled by fools. I've had far too many edits reverted because the established ruler of the page wanted to control everything. Yes, I've even had obvious spelling, and grammatical fixes reverted by the wikipedian control freaks. Once after spending far too long chasing down some details of the 3D .OBJ format (Wavefront), I appended a small missing paragraph about optional vertex texture index inclusion with example in the style as used elsewhere in …
/r/MensRights26/08/13 08:30 AM
11

I think a better idea would be to create an elaborate pulley system for men to be attached to during sex, this way a woman can control every action the man does and become marionettes. Oh, wait, that's exactly what happened here. The woman should be able to directly consent to each movement and action of the male body before it happens... Additionally, farting without consent should be considered assault by male anus. I mean, sure sometimes you can't control when a fart comes out, but you can't …
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:14 AM
2

I reply, "I don't support feminism because I support women's rights without Marxism" Typically I ignore them if they loose their shit at this point -- You can't deconvert the Pope. Otherwise, I proceed to educate them about my study of feminism from either the Marxist Kyriarchy: Ruling Class is the Problem = Oppressed Proletariat rise up against the Bourgeois. Or start at the very beginning with Marxist Feminism, then Radical Feminism being this + Patriarchy, and explain that the entire system o…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:57 PM
4

If the doublethinker labels me wrong no matter what... Then I know I'm right! doubleplusgoodlogic.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:43 PM
0

Well, anecdotally the men I've talked to just don't find women interesting on an intellectual level, of course it could just be the folks I hang out with, but I hang out with LOTS of people -- Hundreds thanks to my local activity clubs, local music venues, and rationality & atheism groups I'm active with. I won't lower my conversational standards for anyone anymore, least of all a parter I'd spend my life with. I've spent nearly two decades of my life in relationships where I was completely bore…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:09 PM
2

I will once again petition reddit for more up arrows per post to click, or at least a larger one to represent the degree of upness I wish to impart.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:10 PM
1

How come I've never heard of this job before? Perhaps you've heard of O'Reilly books? Technical writers write technical manuals and documentation too. If you ever buy a book explaining something technical, chances are it's written by a technical writer. Though I have no degree in such things, through writing of tutorials and documentation explaining the workings of my own creations I've come to appreciate the skill of technical writers. It sounds deceptively simple, but damn it's hard thinking l…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 01:57 PM
17

You just gave a "No True Scotsman" argument. Additionally, you demonstrate a basic lack knowledge about Feminism. Marxist Feminism was created by applying the Marxist Theory to perceived gender issues. Much like other Marxist Theory it seeks a political goal that is not listed in the theory itself: Where Marxist Communism sought to replace one set of elites with another, Marxist Feminism aims to normalize methods of Human production; Additionally even Capitalists love Feminism because instead of…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 03:39 PM
1

I too fantasized about one of my teachers as a 13 year old kid. Jerked it to a pic of her a few times even. I'd have loved to have sex with her. But when she told the principal of my skipping class I was right pissed off. She'd have screwed me right then it would have been against my will, and I'd have called it rape. So, I think it is an adult man's fantasy -- A gross oversimplification of the issue into a blatantly false dichotomy: You fantasize about older women as a teen, therefore any such …
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:15 AM
18

Damn, got news for the females who think CS may be hostile to them: It's not. However, if you haven't been coding since you were a kid then you probably won't like CS and find it hostile, man or woman. I mean, you couldn't keep me from learning how to code and the Internet didn't exist. I mowed hundreds of lawns to buy computers and OSs and C compilers and book on coding (that weren't in the library, and I was a pre-teen, so no college either). I payed dues to a computer club and rode my bike 10…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:57 AM
3

It's exactly the same as if the sexes were reversed, it's rape. I prefer to simply remove the sexes. Teacher has sex with underage student that hates said teacher. Rape? Reason that way, and it gives those gender biased idiots a migraine: If they say it depends on the sexes -- Bingo, they're being sexist. If they think their $Favorite_Sex would be harmed by ignoring rape then it applies to everyone. Conversely if we remove the sexes and pose the question of rape where the two parties lusted afte…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:09 AM
21

Corpus Christi, TX. 2007-ish. Around the release of the iPhone whenever that was. The WIFI is no longer free. I no longer live there. I moved to a bigger city and stopped doing house calls to fix PCs and appliances after sexual assault allegations -- I turned down the advances of a housewife who met me at the door in a towel: "Sorry, I just showered." ('toweling' happens way more often than you think, esp. after the 1st visit...) A shame because the small town was sort of blossoming into affluen…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:51 AM
0

Some children die from the shock and complication of this purely aesthetic cutting done to the highly sensitive regions without any pain killers or numbing agents. Sure people die accidentally, but those botched mutilations and even deaths we have complete power to prevent simply by not doing them.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:36 AM
-1

It's very easy to grasp "you are less likely to be harassed by cops because you are white" but "cops will probably leave you alone because you have white privilege" is somewhat obtuse. As a white person who grew up in a predominantly black neighborhood and was harassed by police equally if not more so than my neighbors, I will call bullshit on such arguments. It's a fact that where crime rates are high police patrol more. It's a sad fact that minorities frequently dominate ghettos. So, the "Chec…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:03 AM
149

I feel your pain... I used to be a technology consultant -- Contract Software, Computer and Home Theater, or electrical appliance repair/installation. I worked for myself and many work orders were spur of the moment -- Fixing it fast is a valuable benefit to the customer who's systems just went down. The ISP was down at my small office and I lived in a small town that was rolling out municipal WIFI so I headed down to the park near an elementary school and set up my laptop while I worked on fixi…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:25 AM
0

I was pretty skeptical when I read the title, but the post explained it pretty well. You are now aware that many radfems would like to reduce the male population significantly. You are now aware that more men are dying from suicide as well as violent crimes and workplace injuries, etc. IMO, there is no "mainstream" feminism. There are only the radicals and the useful idiots with misdirected good intentions who help them achieve the radical goals. TL;DR: Your skepticism was foolish.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:59 PM
7

It means he was thinking about it though! /s
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:23 AM
7

Jesus christ, Esslemut is becoming almost as bad as feminism... Men's Rights is becoming almost as bad as feminism... And you aren't? Just because a poster said something immoral/unkind/whatever doesn't automatically mean all MRAs are the same. Don't you see this is pretty much the same version of what you fucking said?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:20 AM
12

For the sake of argument, let's assume this is true: All men want sex every second of everyday. Note however, it doesn't say with whom...
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:13 AM
17

there isn't actually anything here that makes it any worse than your run-of-the-mill cheating You're implying "run of the mill cheating" includes tricking someone into being financially obligated to raise kids that aren't theirs? Get bent.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:37 PM
20

Came here to say the same. Additionally, I think Evo Psych is used best to understand trends so that we may better gain control over our lives and neither be shamed for having base drives nor be slaves to them... This type of rationalizing is ignorant, literally. I mean, it would be pretty messed up if her hubby got rid of the kids and/or began Mate Guarding her to increase chances of fertilization by his genes -- Or, even sew his wild oats with every woman he could find since ancestral male str…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:33 PM
13

Videogames, sports, dancing, shopping, sex, hanging out with your friends, being with the one you love, having a career, browsing the web, going to the park or beach, having pets. None of that for FOUR YEARS, or else yeah, it does sound like a free pass to do pretty much whatever the fuck you want, and just get away with it. Imagine if she had a guy locked up in her house as a prisoner for four years. What would the sentence be for 4 years of kidnapping? That's what she should have gotten. Weeke…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:14 AM
13

the accused guy can just get over it and move on. Ever been to prison? They make you sign a rape waiver saying you won't sue the prison if you get raped... Basically an "I accept I'll probably be raped" form giving them permission to ignore your rape claims. 4 years... in prison... You know what they do to folks who are in for rape? Yep, "just get over it and move on." If only the courts had told her that, eh? Oh no, can't let the accusation of just one rape slip through the cracks -- That would…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:05 AM
14

how can you preach equality and then only focus on one gender The name is Feminism. If folks don't get the cue from that then they're fools... easy to deceive and useful fools at that, given that few believe so many people could be wrong -- Ignoring the world was once flat.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:53 AM
24

Uh, actually, no. A woman can go to a party, and hook up with someone, and wake up not remembering the sex, and she'll be considered raped to feminists, not able to give consent regardless of whether or not the other party was just as drunk... Even if she was on top. So, your example that sounds extreme is tame by comparison to the real world: She could go out at night, take off her clothes and initiate sex, and still have zero accountability and be called a victim even if were the roles reverse…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:26 PM
2

Your distinction is subjective. Formalness is a formality.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:30 PM
3

I'm saying for a given assailant an argument can be made that women have more to fear. Bullshit. Death is Death bub. Use your brain. You don't get to use self defense unless you fear for your life. So, with more men dying, your head is firmly in the sand. In such a confrontation as a male, I know I am far more likely to be dead. You're [I have deleted several vitriolic names that occupied this space prior to pressing save] dumb.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:39 AM
2

Protip: It's not just about DV issues, but all issues are subject to selective enforcement of the law based on personal views. Source: My family has retired police officers in it, some of them think it's the biggest problem with the world as is, the others think you should shut your mouth because they chose to put their lives on the line, so they can decide how to enforce the law.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:31 AM
2

Why not just get a Spishak Mach20? 20 blades, and you'll never need another razor again. Or if you're feeling randy, try a Gillette 3000.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:46 AM
1

shave like a man. Have you seen our ancestors and cousins on the tree of life? Men have facial hair, why cut it all off? Look, I understand trimming, but just look at how hairy all the other apes are. The difference? They don't have razors. I mean, it started with the bum, sure, fine, but we're already up to our necks in fur-deficiency on average. Keep this shaving thing up we'll be bald! It's already starting to happen to some!
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:42 AM
2

Not only that, but the guilt of feeling irrational fear (like fear of the dark, or fear of different looking people), can lead to unhealthy rationalizations. Such as: Why do I fear them? I'm not a bad person, they must be the bad ones... No Wonder! Just look at these crime stats! Sadly, humans have only just begun to harness the ability to think rationally, it will be a while yet before they learn to think with their entire minds. My feelings are a fast but inaccurate logic unit -- The instincts…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:27 AM
2

As an atheist who grew up in a devoutly Christian home, I pretty much agree. Decades later my mother is an atheist, and our ethics and thoughts on humanitarian issues have aligned. My grandparents share the same beliefs, but didn't voice them to me as a child, and a great grandparent even wrote in their diary about advocating for what we would now call Men's and Human rights issues. Seems there was a while where the religious influence was strong before I was born and for a while after, but it d…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:12 AM
2

how did Swedes become such brainwashed feminist zombies? What are the antecedents? Why is the stereotype true? This Documentary Explains a bit, if you really are interested... It's simply Feminism left to run unchecked. Even the scientists are running scared. If they run out of bogeymen, they create more. TL;DR: Fear of rape = money for the church of victimhood.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:55 AM
1

Any who study quantum physics agree.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:30 AM
2

False Dichotomy. False Equivalence. Stop irrational thoughts one moron at a time.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:15 AM
3

This subreddit got to lighten up ?? Did you see the thread? Mission accomplished. Additionally, screw your false dichotomies. I can laugh at shit and do serious things all in the same place.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:05 AM
5

Exactly, MRA is turning (has turned) into nothing more than the inverse of radical feminism. Last I checked the two were nothing alike. Also, only a troll forms their opinion of reality based only on online forum BS. Protip: This is online forum level BS. It's not the same as claiming we should rid the world of all but 10% of Jews or Women, etc.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:02 AM
2

The strong show no weakness. The wise show only the weakness they want others to see. The weak claim weakness as strength and shame both the strong and wise for being so.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:54 AM
2

Ah, the douche... having no thought of their own except of being prepared to gush forth PH balanced regurgitation into any vagina at the slightest perception of not so freshness. A term is used best when its literal translation is still apt.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:49 AM
4

At some point however, on a personal level, one must hold the individuals responsible for their actions. For instance: Even in a society where murder of a group of individuals isn't frowned upon, I would still do no harm. Society can enable bad behavior, but it's the individuals must behave badly. I've experienced the same sort of blow back you describe... It's about the same as holding anyone accountable for any wrong doings. Humans are predisposed to believe their wrongs are right, and will fi…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:44 AM
3

link is Manhood "Academy" propaganda.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:37 AM
14

Welcome to the next level. However, don't discount the power of self delusion. I'm on the stage where appearances mean nothing, no matter how convincing. Folks can actually be so self deluded they believe in completely untrue and provably false things -- Even to the extent that they feel things that aren't there, including emotions... or even limbs. Even when someone is actually balling their eyes out and possibly even bleeding I'll refuse to believe anything they say unless I have sufficient ev…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 08:02 AM
2

Well, just imagine if we're 98% the same as Chimps how similar we must be to one another. Might have had some variety in choice back before humans merged with Neanderthals... Gone are the good ol' days.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:50 AM
2

Sesame Street? Really? They have no credibility since they ripped off the entire English Greek Phonetician Alphabet and Arabic Numbering Systems on a regular basis. I mean, they stereotype garbage men as grouches! FFS. Doesn't anyone have any completely meaningless context free symbolism (read: originality) anymore?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:16 AM
0

"Die in a Fire" -- One of the podcasts I listen to frequently uses this as an endearing form of "goodbye". Eg: "Thanks for listening everyone, we love you! Die in a Fire." I've often heard phrases like this, or "go kill yourself" used in the same maner as "OMG" or "shut up!" is used; Also as a replacement for "go fuck yourself" -- Which isn't meant literally. One of the basic tenets of cybernetics is that outputs depend on the inputs AND internal state. Information theorists would say signal map…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:01 AM
1

*Craing
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:53 AM
1

1D = One Direction = Single Dimension = Reduced to a single aspect = Objectification; Figures.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:51 AM
3

This. It can't be said enough. The same goes for indie game devs and other areas where the chance of success is very slim, and the time and effort required great. Telling indeed in that you only need a computer to make games or instrument to make music (or hell, just a voice), but we see so few female artists despite there being no barrier to entry except a will to sacrifice yourself.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:06 AM
0

As when it comes to economics feminism well fails. Hmm. Let's say I'm a either a capitalist or communist elitist, doesn't matter which. Now let's say I think more workers makes more money and that means more profit and taxes. Now let's say the "status quo" is that in a family one person works and the other does the equally valuable job of child rearing. Now what we need is not an ideology that "combats gender roles" and gives the family a choice as to which parent raises the kid... No, what we n…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 04:28 AM
4

Explain ... Explain ... Explain. Explained: Gish Gallop. And one person being advantaged vs. another being disadvantaged is the same exact thing. No, it's actually not. For instance, a friend of mine has photosensitive seizures. I wrote a program for her that basically puts everything on the computer screen at a 1/4th second lag so it can buffer and detect flashes, and dim the screen so they don't trigger seizures. Yep, someone with an issue that can actually be triggered. She uses the system pr…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:46 AM
10

Actually yes, if they can't provide example of institutionalized sexism... Then the institutionalized sexism doesn't exist. Oh no you didn't! You didn't just actually assert that evidence be required for a belief to exist, Did You?! You just crossed the line. Them's logic words.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:34 AM
4

... Misandry is on Facebook To connect with Misandry, sign up for Facebook today. - Facebook.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:25 AM
8

evil and only want sex. The evil is thinking that wanting sex is bad. I'm better at wanting sex than my female parters have been. Life is the result of sex, thus an inherent drive in all living things... I would not dare extrapolate further to say that I am better at Life than them -- that would just be too logical.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:12 AM
9

I've got a better idea. Stop considering the stats as Female or Male, that's sexist. Just consider them as People on People crimes. TADA, no sexist rubbish to base any gendered laws on. Oh, but that would require these social scholars to give up ideas such as "patriarchy", and actually embrace equality. Note how she points out that it's men harming women at night... Well, far more men are killed in those same nights so women don't really have anything to fear at all, they're already safer. I rea…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:49 AM
1

Actually, No. If the folks would have stood up to the Nazism instead of ignoring it, it wouldn't have gained as much popularity. You think it gained popularity over night? It was a massive propaganda campaign, something like "Don't be that Jew". It gained traction because no one fought back against the dehumanization and threat narrative, thus SLOWLY allowing the public opinion to be swayed more and more to accept the final solution. Get a history book you fool. Here, let me show you the retarda…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:16 AM
-19

Nazism can not function without men. Nazism requires men's support (or at least men's indifference) Nazism requires men's money, and men's resources. Nazism also requires men's on going attention. You want to know the fastest way to prevent a Holocaust? Ignore the Nazis. Yeah, sorry, no. Edit: To the downvoters: If you think ignoring a problem will fix it, why the fuck are you on this subreddit?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:23 AM
24

men are not as capable of being empathetic. Pretty much rendering anything I say as worthless. So, she didn't take into consideration how that would make you/men feel? Oh, the empathy!
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:20 AM
7

What's interesting is a rhetorical trick I randomly came up with for dealing with such sayings about "strong" and "strength". Just replace them with ODOR. A STRONG smelling MAN CAN HANDLE A STRONG smelling WOMAN. A WEAK scented MAN WILL SAY SHE HAS AN ATTITUDE about scent. If it makes no sense, that's because such statements were senseless to begin with. First off: Strength of mind or body has nothing to do with "handling" (control over? acceptance of?) another person. You can't control the acti…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:40 AM
1

Men's Rights is not mutually exclusive with Women's Rights. It is about what the name implies (men's rights issues). It doesn't prevent women's rights issues from existing. Note that men and women have different issues, see: Pregnancy. Unlike Feminism -- Which literally means: Belief in the Feminine. Men's Rights doesn't come with beliefs. Note: Kyriarchy ("rule by a lord") has all the same ideological trappings as Feminism does. And these are both forms of Marxism. Marxism has nothing to do wit…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:53 AM
4

Either side will not make progress towards gender equality by blaming the other gender. This is a truism. It has no merit in of itself. It's like saying: Good is good, Evil is evil, or cooperation for a common good is good. What you've said here is silly. MRAs do not blame women for their problems. MRA = Men's Rights Activist. It has no ideological baggage attached. Simply advocating for men's rights -- There's no "feminine social construct" in the MRM to use as a scapegoat like feminism has in …
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:15 AM
4

Misdirected angst like that just discredits MR. Ah, well then you can agree that the entire Feminist movement has been utterly discredited time and again, throughout its existence. /s
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:27 AM
1

Also beware of talking in absolutes. That I wholeheartedly agree with. Saying 'studies have indicated' rather than 'x is a fact,heres a citation' is a much better attitude to take. Yes, well, that's all well and good, unless you're given the Gish Gallop. In which case it's best to have a bunch of facts dump into the discussion. It's also worth knowing that certain sources, like the CDC, have skewed results. So that when their papers are cited as refutation you can more easily debunk bogus claims…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:47 PM
-3

What you sound like: Edit: Note this is a rhetorical tool, not a personal attack. Comment if you downvote so that I may know why you do so. Can you both be Black and a White Supremacist? I'm potentially burning my own cross here, but I'm a black who would consider himself a White Supremacist in the sense that I believe in racial equality and don't believe that color is a prerequisite for how a person should act and doesn't hold sway over the individual. At the same time, I do agree that White Su…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 05:36 PM
2

Thunderf00t has a couple of good videos to provide a primer on just what these cultists are doing. Indeed, here's part 3 which painfully illustrates the divisionist victimhood complex... It's telling to me that they would take something so simple as non-belief in gods (atheism) and then shove all that other ideological crap into the +. It's apparent they're merely hiding behind the appearances. Reminds me of how the PATRIOT Act is supposed to sound like a good patriotic thing to support...
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:45 AM
3

By this unsolicited reply, I have now become your stalker. How shameful of me. Have anyone a cat 'o nine tails, I am in desperate need of a flogging and public shaming for my unsolicited information exchange. Oh, if only I hadn't exercised my 1st Amendment Male Privilege! By their logic, unless you are asked to speak on a specific topic first, you should not do so... None of their public statements are specifically 'solicited' either; Do they want to be this "regressive" as to require consent be…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:12 PM
10

Sadly, it's not the atheism but the + in atheism+ that I take issue with. With such low standard of "evidence" required before belief it should be called Feminism+ instead.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:36 PM
7

The Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:26 AM
-14

This is a men's right sub, and we'd rather people not imply we'd turn it into an us v. them issue. Respect is a two way street. Stop disrespecting others with your passive aggressive B.S. and you'll get some from me. Please point to instances of us making it into an us vs them issue, or your post is severely off-topic. Screw you too buddy.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:02 AM
1

To reiterate abnoctopus' question, why would we want them scared? They believe in an ideology based on male hatred and divisionism. The Matrix is scary because: What if everything you believe is wrong? Thus, they should be scared. For the moral, the phrase, "What have I done?" comes to mind. That's fear. Additionally, the professional feminists who make their money by pushing the lie that only womens-aide issues need funding, and try to cover all gender issues under their umbrella so they can se…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 09:51 AM
13

Hey I would go see that by myself. Back off! Lol ... u can borrow my kids then. don't be such a creep! lol. Ugh. So, a guy is an alleged creep if he goes to an animated film alone? However, if a parent "lends" him a kid then he's not a creep.... What if the creep has already kidnapped and tortured into submission a kid to bring to the movies? What if the creep is a woman? OMG! All those alleged mothers are so Creepy! LOfuckingL On a related note: Animation, like games and photosensitive-film, ar…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 01:23 AM
6

And here's the second beauty part - it won't take much for it to work, much less than when men are being hurt, so there will be fewer innocent women getting unfairly disciplined or expelled. That's where you're wrong mate. Such happens then "sexual misconduct" will just be re-engineered such that menfolk are the only possible perpetrators, for instance: Penetration by Penis, or threat thereof.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:26 AM
13

Just a heads up, archiving sites don't really work, in that it's stupidly easy to get around, especially if you can search a phrase in Google. I'd recommend using Anonymouth to obfuscate the commenters' writing patterns, then screenshot the output and colorized blocks over all the names. Of course... it can still be found. Only takes one person to comment with a np.reddit link to undo all that hard work. So, you see. In any event it only keeps honest folks honest. Nothing we can do about brigade…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:15 AM
20

just as much an "objectification" and a "sexualization" of a male character? I note that you use quotes here. However, the folly is in those terms. They are intellectually empty. To say one is objectified is the most insulting to the observers. One who is seen as reduced to an object implies false statistical prevalence. The term "objectified" means that observers are limited to only viewing a character in one way. It is dishonest. Characters have elements. Characteristics are used, not objectif…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:31 AM
1

As a feminist, I believe in gaining equality for women where it's lacking. That's not to say I want equality only for women. As an MRA, I believe in gaining equality for men where it's lacking. Well, if you are rational, then you can see the obvious flaw. MRA stands for Mens Rights Activist. Feminist is not equivalent to Women's Rights Activist. At its core are unfounded untested theories that play heinous identity politics aimed at harming men maleness male nature Masculinity. Feminism isn't ab…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:40 PM
5

Uh, yeah. I mean. Ever since it was founded, I thought everyone knew what Marxist Feminism, and it's first offspring: Radical Feminism was all about... Not that it was based on observation of facts, just rampant unproven idealism with ever more layers of confirmation bias to support it... Marxism creates a class war against the haves and have-nots. Now, this isn't necessarily a bad thing, but anything taken to an extreme is bad. The main theme of Marxist Communism is creating a normalized system…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:11 AM
14

Corporations love feminism. Tell the home makers they are oppressed and double the workforce... Then pay can be lowered via competition. Oh, shucks, look at that unemployment just lowering wages further; Also we need more H1B visas to do the same thing, but with even lower paid immigrants. We fake job listings and turn away everyone as a requirement to get more H1Bs. Silly Americans, they're so easy to fool. Also, if you're still getting your news from any mainstream media... WTF man, that's the…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:01 PM
6

I tend to agree with you. However, since I make games I can't avoid the shit-storm entirely; I'm almost obligated to watch them so that I can arm myself for the delusional deluge against me and my kind. Personally, I think her vids are hurting feminism, and she's only using that cause to help bolster herself. Some folks think her vids have more merit because she's been hired as an EA consultant... To many devs I talk to, that lowers their opinion of her: EA is basically misandry incorporated: Th…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:03 PM
17

In other web forums I've found folks who are at least open to discussion of facts. I ignore the videos on reddit because that battle in enemy territory is a pointless one to pick, however in other places links to actual studies showing that there is no evidence videogames cause lasting aggression (derp, playing any competitive anything causes short term competitive behavior by definition), and that the videos give no context to violence against men when speaking about violence against women, and…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 01:41 PM
2

I mean, living with this is just normal to me but like having your ear pierced shouldn't you choose once your able to. Have you ever had an orgasm from your ear? Look mate, when I was a child I didn't get to decide... I know many men who were pressured into the procedure as boys without being given the full story. The reasoning behind why these things are done is religious: It's to reduce the pleasure of sexual stimulation -- If they could just lop the pleasure centers out of brains way back whe…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:43 AM
9

No, those phrases are Orwellian double speak to the core. I mean, "Sex-positive feminism"? Orwellian double-speak adds unnecessary qualifiers that create connotations where none would otherwise need to exist. "Reclaiming Their Sexuality" The connotations here are that women have lost their sexuality... Which if you take a look at any folks from the 60's 70's 80's 90's 00's, etc... Where was it lost? In the just be different 60's? The free love 70's the gender bending 80's? The uber sexy 90's? No…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:20 AM
4

There's nothing wrong with reacting, I support it. I include myself in the group, I just don't identify with the MRM as a force of masculinism to offset the force of feminism. I think that defining Mens Rights in the terms of Feminist Identity Politics is what's a bit confusing. The Mens' Right Movement isn't Masculinism, in the same way that Womens' Rights Movement isn't Feminism... Feminism claims all social issues under it's umbrella, and has tried to become synonymous with women's rights. Me…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:04 AM
2

Unless the meaning of Bourgeois changed, then wouldn't the majority of them be Bourgeois? well I'd say it depends on whether or not they own the means of production. it doesnt matter if you own a macbook. What if you have a vagina instead? Let me just check my elementary school biology text book.... Hmm, yeah, that's the means of all human production.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:01 PM
22

This situations seems so contrived and...plastic. I've put my arm around a number of women, before. Me too. Especially while she's been drinking, to keep her from falling over. In fact, I've even taken REALLY drunk girls back to my place when they couldn't even tell me how to get to her place. I even stood over her while she was puking all over my bed in her sleep, and thrust my bucket under her head and made sure she didn't choke to death, and slept on the floor or on the couch. I don't make a …
/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:04 AM
1

I would argue that societies don't actually need to blame a single group for their problems... However, the people causing the problems will often help point to a class of people as the scapegoat. Hence: Jews, Blacks, etc., being blamed for economic downturns, crime rates, etc. Guess what men? The folks causing the problems think we're a nice scapegoat... even going so far as to say, "you are blind to your privilege", and other such nonsense to ensure the blame-label sticks. EG: Why is it a big …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:23 PM
-3

Not sure I follow. If you gauge other movements by select few morons, even racial equality would be a "joke" to you.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 11:46 AM
-6

His code source is recognized by other developers as being very well designed, high quality, high performance code. HAHAHA. No. I've worked on porting his bullishit. It's quickly slopped together, and it's not well designed or high quality. It has some spiffy kludgey hacks borrowed from the demoscene. Carmack Has 1st. He had the money and time to make market first, and Romero's brilliant insistence on publishing the level formats (which modders had already reverse engineered, and Carmack threate…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:36 PM
-10

The question is... Are you a Sensationist? It's OK to see her, but not to observe her with ANY other indirect senses? What if he wanted to hear her? OH, that's OK? Well, I'm not seeing a reason that scent is any worse. Wouldn't it be some corporate designed fragrance, and not really a creation of her own? You're aware fingernails and hair don't have a scent... right? Please do enlighten me. Keep in mind that porn isn't smell-o-vision. What is porn? Sight and sound.... Let's say he didn't want to…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:47 AM
3

Cougars and Panthers and Bears, Oh My! Cougars and Panthers and Bears, Oh My! Cougars and Panthers and Bears, Oh My!
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:45 AM
6

My body is composed of matter that is 13.7 billion years in the making. If you are older than that, it's over age, and I want to take a ride in your police box... if you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:42 AM
16

As a society then, we need to take responsibility for the presumption that marriage is OK. We look at our evolutionary relatives, isolated native folks, and history and it paints a much different picture about human nature. If culture is toxic to human nature, including the demonization of sex, then who gives a damn at that point in the game? In an environment where no one is taking responsibility, being irresponsible may not be ethical, but it's sane.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:24 AM
7

“I feel like I always have to watch my back, watch what I wear, watch how I act, watch where I go, watch where I sit on the bus, and watch everything around me,” writes one survey respondent. No mention of the men with PTSD ... Yeah... No mention of the fact that their own fear mongering is responsible for their fear either. My female cousin said something about being so scared all the time to my mother, who responded, "Honey, you're crazy if you think all the men out there suddenly became super…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:11 PM
5

Well, it's important. After all. If it weren't for the black people who discovered clothes, then they wouldn't have been able to visit colder climates and become white. The important thing here is that the fashion industry is the root of all evil.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:01 PM
9

You say argue where I think you mean reason...
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:54 PM
0

At some point, one starts to wonder if feminists have even considered the thought that an ideology positing that men are privileged might contribute to a cultural perception that men don't really have significant problems At yet another point, one starts to realize that feminism was engineered to rip men and women apart by application of Marxism, and that it was not a response to a woman's rights issue -- these were merely the vehicle of indoctrination by which the state creates twice as many wo…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:08 PM
11

It's funny how reading the first few paragraphs with a bit of fore-knowledge it's impossible not to see it just dripping with satire -- More specifically, a decent portrayal of how men are treated while not expected to be outraged by the situation. If you were incensed by the first part of the article, I would suggest you go back and read it again until your rage is aimed appropriately elsewhere.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:28 PM
7

I think videos do help keep folks honest. This clearly wasn't the first of her fits, and was probably recorded as a response to her posting to her friends on social media about how much of a "bad guy" he is. I do AI research, and one of my personal cybernetics projects feeds video and audio of everything I do into a machine learning home automation system. The systems only need about 1 hour of history to do the learning processing while I train the "smarter home" system, so it can't pull up ever…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:10 AM
17

The classification of heterosexuality or homosexuality or any other variant actually only exists in culture. We don't find this in our evolutionary relatives. Gender is an invention of overly complex minds: It's a trap. Stereotyping folks into gays / lesbians / heterosexuals / etc. is ridiculous. Ideas such as "the third sex" are asinine. Sexual preferences don't obey such categorization naturally. Classifying sexual preferences is retarding progress, like anything else there's a gradient / curv…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:05 PM
9

It is silly. All while growing up until around my mid 20s I was "underweight". My nickname was "stick man" and other similar terms, folks joked that I needed to tape my ears back or I'd blow away like a kite. I put on some weight, not obese, right around my "target weight" for my height and saw some old high-school friends, "Dude, you got fat." I'm fit, strong, can bench my body weight, and exercise, though I could probably survive a "harsh winter". ... Contrast this with my old school chum who …
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:32 PM
5

If I were a parent I could understand the position of not wanting my kid to come home from school and start watching porn 3-4 times a week while furiously fapping away. You don't understand shit then. Then you could password your computers BIOS and supervise your kid online and/or install nanny software instead of making the nation do a parent's job for them. There is no justifiable stance for this censorship bullshit. Get that into your head and keep it there. People can SELF CENSOR, we don't n…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:09 PM
4

Just like Norton AV's "hate site" filtering of men's rights sites? Yeah, I can see that happening. I almost want the governments to get as oppressive as possible sooner than later, the common man won't fight back until the jackboot is at his own throat.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:06 PM
2

Even generally good things can become negative if taken to an extreme. Rationality is evaluation instead of blind labeling. I'm not saying you are irrational, just mentioning it's wise to not to give socialism a free pass at being non-negative.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:51 PM
2

He slots his pulsing module deep into her databank as she teasingly tweaks her peripheral feeders. Sparks fly as the massive upload fills her beyond the brink of overload. Cybersex? Cybersex.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:40 PM
6

he is a grown man and should be held accountable for his choice. You have a headache? Here is a red pill and a blue pill. The red pill is aspirin, the blue pill is cyanide. You choose. Ah, you've swallowed the red pill! You'll be dead soon! It was aspirin, but I put cyanide in them both, you should be held accountable for your actions! HA! Dead man walking! A false choice is not a choice, no matter how much of a 'grown man' you are. By your logic, we should blame the folks who get raped for thei…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:17 PM
1

It's the portrayal of anyone as intellectually inferior that rubs me the wrong way. E.g: The guy who always burns an iron mark into the clothes. Yeah, the service men that die in wars with the crispest of uniforms would tend to make this type of ad not only disrespectful, but disgustingly disgraceful. Men can clean. Janitors exist. Classifying men or women categorically as inept repetitively is wrong. Equal occurrences of idiocy would be fine. Sex sells, there is absolutely nothing wrong with se…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:23 AM
6

Indeed. I'm not satisfied with scraps of acknowledgement. This is no "step in the right direction" this is more like, "no, see, we're on your side, really..." No, they're pretending to be. Placation and support are two different things. This is the former. We must make the latter ourselves. Media will never call themselves on the carpet for slanted bullshit in the past and future. For the last 50 years, men have been seen as the problem. Men have been lumped together into one big roiling, oppres…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:50 PM
3

If it weren't for the original women's movement they probably wouldn't be able to vote right now, Married folk were considered one person. The union of man and woman got to share one vote. Likewise, the male got to go to jail for crimes the female may commit -- you wouldn't throw a kids mother in jail; The man was obligated to provide for the family and the woman to provide the equally valuable role of handling the estate and children. Now, this wasn't optimal, but it was far from the false oppr…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:44 PM
22

Fuck the system! It will instead fuck you.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:15 PM
13

Right, so the guy that notices them strikes up a conversation; Later out for drinks he gets drugged and raped. If you don't think this can happen, then you're the one being ridiculous. It indeed happened to my brother after winning his soccer game. He called me the next morning not knowing how he got there or where he was, left the house immediately. Drug abuse isn't tolerated so he got a blood test which showed he'd been drugged and it was against his will: He wouldn't do drugs, firmly against …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:00 PM
1

"Everyone" includes the writer, most especially. Note that it was a blog post, not a comic. Try not to be so ignorant. Q: Who is more the fool? The fool acting foolish, the fool inciting foolishness, or the fool accepting these fools? A: No one can tell the difference.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:51 PM
1

If he’s smart, he takes the path of least resistance most of the time, which involves considering the emotional realities of other people Right, so show empathy for everyone else...but ourselves. Why? So that the path of least resistance becomes narrow and controllable, and leads off a damn cliff. Scott Adams is a fucking idiot. Feminists and other ignorant fools have proven you can be successful at social commentary without much insight, intelligence or wit. The man has a gift, it's that the wo…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:44 PM
5

Ah yes. That would be due mental process. The operative word being that the process is down right mental.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:51 PM
1

I plan ahead, and walk slowly everywhere I go. If I'm going to do the time, I'm going to do the "crime" and actually be creepy.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:47 PM
0

Equality can be achieved, but you have to understand basic algebra to evaluate the system. Expecting a 50/50 splits among folks at the top of a field where women aren't 50/50 at the bottom is not equality. In my homebrew/hobby video gamejam club there's 2-3 women, 8-12 men gamedevs. We have "developer's choice" awards for our crappy games. Over several sets of awards the percentage of female winners is 20% to 80% men, go figure, algebra works. We derailed a whole evening of game making a couple …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:49 AM
5

Right, because a murderer donated to a cancer fund, our view of them is now incredible.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:42 PM
1

The Nazis declared there would be no animal cruelty under their rein. My memory is not so short and childish as to dismiss all wrongs for a single candy of goodness. The article can stand on its own merit. I will not credit the magazine, but the few people who work for them getting this one article published. The future is not known, this could spell the end of their employ. Would you credit the magazine then if the article got the author fired? Time will tell. As it stands my opinion of the mag…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:31 PM
26

Video games will objectify both male and female characters at an extreme level The problem is the term "objectify". They don't objectify anyone. Did sonic objectify hedgehogs? Gimme a break. Objectification, Sexualization, Power Fantasy, are all weasel words. I know, I've asked gamers. Just listen to what folks coming out of a movie theater, or having played a game thought of the characters. There won't be a heterogeneous list of traits required for the aforementioned terms to even properly appl…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:51 PM
6

Journey. They couldn't even make words. It was claimed amazing and award winning... I gaged.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:37 PM
16

Mine is this: Women's Studies is the outrageous belief that hypotheses don't need unbiased peer reviewed evidence to become theories.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:32 PM
8

never ever dump lists of 'facts' when in a discussion or argument or debate. Never say never again. Learn to pick your battles. There are times when in enemy territory when the best thing to do is cut your loses and leave, but not before dumping a list of facts for any interested parties. The other side of the discussion doesn't always play fair. Since MRAs hold unpopular views they are typically outnumbered. In fact, the opponents will even completely ignore previously won points and reassert w…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:57 PM
-1

Men objectify beauty, women objectify wealth. s/objectify/desire/ Note: That I'm not saying that's all they desire, or that all men and all women do desire these... That's something a silly absolutist who uses terms like "objectify" would do. I don't see how this is a men's rights issue. Consider divorce in a society where it is more common for the women to desire a man with money, and for the man to desire beauty over money. Now, what kind of preferential laws might this cause... Hmm? If your m…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:23 PM
0

Biology is the radical notion that life is organic. As a cyberneticist, this offends me to no end.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:15 PM
1

It's not very durable as a tool for understanding human behavior. Incorrect. People who use the term Objectification are rarely objective in their observations. That is to say, use of the term is a good indicator of bullshit artists intentionally, or accidentally (the latter implying ignorance). To illustrate the point, stand near the exit of a movie theater. Note that rarely do any of the viewers have the same opinion and ideas about the film's "message" or the characters' "drive". Objectificat…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:26 PM
4

No, the it was the initial woman who hit the guy, the lady that came in later's hand just got in the mix, but she wasn't the one that stepped in and hit him. He was calling out for someone to stop her, so the lady who stepped in did. Hard to see, had to watch it twice, but managed to freeze it at the right frame and see what went on.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:52 PM
-5

Another newspeak subscriber... Protip: Words like Intellectual Property, Scare Quotes, Software Piracy, Rape Culture, Patriarchy, etc. ^ This is newspeak... I'm not a pro, just a concerned citizen... ;P It's Orwellian scale rubbish. So is going after a guy for rape because of comments on the Internet. Protip: The guy said the gal liked rough sex, telling him to "try harder", that's when he "raped her", but it wasn't rape in this context if it even happened at all. I've had GFs with BDSM fantasie…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:27 PM
3

And it's just amazing how people see what they want to see in these posters instead of the actual message. It's not amazing to me because the same arguments could be applied to the original "don't be that guy" posters and the implications that all men are potential rapists didn't spark outrage. If it's amazing to you, you've underestimated the degree of male hatred in the world. EG: It's disgusting, but I'm not amazed the KKK hates minorities.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:44 PM
6

I am a web developer, and I approve this message.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:41 PM
6

Putting posters up in secret, not going through the proper channels to even get those posters put up. Those were key mistakes. The real mistake is having unpopular opinion silenced by removing anonymity by requiring registration for the posters. Your nation's founders would be outraged at your foolish sentiment.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:36 PM
8

How can you expect to be taken seriously when the groups advocating men's rights are doing everything in secret? Wow. Google exists you moron. Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree with the message but it was handled poorly. Well, get bent then fool. The poster is about the message not the messengers. Get some perspective: I live in Texas. There was a time I wouldn't put my name on racial equality posters for fear of being lynched. There are some towns, like Jasper, where I STILL wouldn't point t…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:28 PM
3

Call me cynical, but, if mens issues get enough exposure because of outrage by supposed womens issues supporters, then the networks will just drop coverage of both to bury it. I mean, just before Fathers Day ABC ran a piece on how Dad's were horrible at taking care of kids. "Guys are just dumb." said the "expert" on parenting.... We can't rely on existing media for anything that's too critical, they'll expose themselves as rampant misandrists.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:25 PM
4

Or! They could just stop being the people that are mocked! Just like guys can just not be "that guy." Don't be THAT Feminist.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:16 PM
3

http://www.cultural-misandry.com/mens-rights/ Scroll down to False Rape section.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:14 PM
14

Nobody would report sexual assault needlessly because it is a grueling process to go through.” ERROR 42: Evidence Not Found. ORIGIN: "Because" encountered in sentence 2, quoted paragraph 1. REMARK: Logic unit can not process causal claim: Insufficient peer reviewed data.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:09 PM
0

The word 'rapist" has lost its meaning. For optimal compression of speech I think we should shift the accent from the first to the second syllable and let Rap Artists have it, lexicographically speaking. Additionally, many rapists already have no regard for political correctness in the use of variants of aforementioned derogatory or inflammatory labels in the music they make.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:28 PM
4

I would like to see the peer reviewed evidence of your unsubstantiated claims. Oops, now I'm a rapist! Scientapist? Hmm, bumper sticker time.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:14 PM
-7

You should be banned for this unwarranted threat. It appears that you are applying chilling effect tactics based on lizard brain mentality i.e. something along the lines of: "They said something I don't like, I don't need to read what they wrote/posted to know they should be banned." FYI: That's not the attitude any mod should have. In the future you might find it more appropriate to post with a different account than the one you mod with, to avoid the conflict of interest. Additionally don't de…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:06 PM
-8

Wouldn't the quotes add legitimacy as being in the subject's own words, rather than just what the writer thinks? Or are you one of those subscribers to newspeak? in that case it is goodthinkful of you to suggest the promoval of scarequotes for the prosecutionation of thoughtcriminals unpunctuation is doubleplusgood for smothier readlyness
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:00 PM
4

The man is awesome and heroic if (and only if) he saves the damsel or dies for an higher cause. Heroism is servitude. This is completely bogus mindless drivel. First off, define objectification -- I fail to see how an avatar is "objectified" by this retarding distinction babies "objectify" parents during mimesis. It's dumb. Secondly, games are completed RARELY if ever by the vast majority of game players. If you watch the first quarter of any movie, read the same portion of any book, or play the…
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:48 PM
3

hair suit*
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:38 PM
9

Mine as well. Her multiple fighting styles require a level of finesse that is bewilderingly amazing when combos are pulled off gracefully.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:36 PM
61

But! Lack of Female Representation!
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:32 PM
-11

being a douche. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means... He's not that great, he's been chased off Reddit a couple times for getting rid of that 'not so fresh' feeling some women have. See?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 01:09 PM
1

Never Have Daughters, or You'll risk changing your mind about that stance being "immature". The truth is that everyone's a "pervert" -- Which necessarily means the term does not apply. It's not perverted if it's normal.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:23 PM
1

Yeah, funny how aprox. half the voters are female, but these folks are blaming the republican nonsense on men wanting to have say over women's bodies...
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:50 PM
3

BAT FLAN?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:42 PM
2

Indeed, since donning a fedora has special connotations to a subsection of the mentally deranged, it can be a good way to identify and filter those who ascribe behaviors to irrelevant appearances. These same folks may have preconceived notions about folks who have penises maleness masculinity. Personally, the fedora has too few propellers for my taste.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:29 PM
1

The reason people hate you is because you don't explain yourself properly. OR, it could possibly be the Feminists who demonetize the MRAs. It's not our image, it's Feminists' image that's the issue. Having a bunch of facts and figures at our fingertips to refute nonsense is all I've needed to convince folks all that feminist rhetoric is nonsense. For the people who won't listen, fuck 'em. They'll come around eventually. Instead of wasting time on people that can't be convinced it's more importan…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:06 PM
3

Or, maybe we can just be however the fuck we are, get noticed as the not giving a damn about nonsense folks. The issue here is that Feminism doesn't sound evil like White Supremacy does, yet. "I'm a KKK, and I believe that racial issues should be considered, blah blah blah" Uh! Why do you want to hurt black folks?! "I don't hate minorities, not all KKK are like that! There are different kinds of KKK, take me, I'm for racial equality" Why the hell do you claim to be a KKK then? "Oh, you just don'…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:52 PM
1

IMO, you've confused women's rights activist with Feminism.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:41 PM
24

Yep. Those are unpreventable accidental causes. A medical procedure is willfully done by choice, and wholly preventable.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:17 PM
6

"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle" ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War Those folks weren't really your friends. Sounds like they were just using you. You think you know someone... Why do so many people seem to hate [MRAs]?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:11 PM
7

Women's restrooms are the worst. I know, I've had the job to clean both mens' and womens' toilets. Might want to teach women how to expose the urethra so they can stand and pee like men do. Their "Hovering to Pee" bullshit is far more disgusting and unhygienic. That's right. I said it: Women, learn how to piss standing up. You're being gross.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:06 AM
3

Ah, there it is. My great grandfather's nostalgic collection of prohibition supporter propaganda. These fancy coasters don't hold a candle to the fear mongering nonsense that spawned prohibition and skyrocketed the power of mobsters.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:03 AM
34

The feminist movement claims all gender issues as its own. Feminist lobbyists then selectively further women's rights to the detriment of men. Mens' rights activists seek to equalize not just the rights, but the responsibilities of men and women. Feminist activists don't want the obligations that come with the rights they demand; They do not want to lose their ability to selectively lobby for women and against men's rights. Mens' rights activists would compete for funding with the professional f…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:23 AM
2

A broken clock is correct twice a day.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 05:02 PM
23

No it really is the CPS you should be angry at. They are perpetrating harm against children. Giving children back to clearly abusive mothers and investigating the men who reported the crime... If you're not against this shit, then you're probably not against laws that toss men in jail when their wives abuse them and the cops are called. The important thing to note is that were the father a mother instead, the investigations would not have been ordered.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:49 PM
3

It is the mark of a foolish person to support a movement he disagrees with by enrolling in a class when the literature is available elsewhere. Imagine: What if most of the students were such as you? The class would continue to be provided and the other few would believe the bullshit. What if most of these students instead abstained from the class? The number of enrolled would plummet.... What happens when a course is under enrolled? It's not like the books will be erased if the course is no long…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:00 AM
3

Did you report it? I made that mistake once. I saw a grown 250Lbs woman lift a 4 year old child by the arm and punch her just below the armpit. She left the child with a neighbor two doors down, and I called Children's Protective Services. The neighbor said she didn't give any contact information, but she was running to the store. Two cops showed up, and waited for 6 hours for the mother to return before finally leaving with the child. The next day a CPS worker came to my home, and began investi…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:11 AM
1

Who knows? Probably just latching onto anything sensational they can. I say leverage it for all it's worth.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:14 AM
4

Wiki-esque
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:22 AM
1

Right on. Making women is hard work, folks should expert to be compensated.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:13 AM
1

I would say that I support equality under the law. Aha, Gotcha! What about equality above the law, eh? /s
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:11 AM
7

At least they only had to experience it once...
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:49 AM
6

Her reasoning will be very thin This is not true. Their reasoning will be varied and thick with half truths and flawed and circular logic. The tangle of reasoning will be based on a fear of oppression, and the fear in their minds is real, thus they think the oppression is also real. The end condition they seek can not be met by a fair and truly equal system because it is illogical, irrational, and essentially insane. They want an equality based on an inequality. Many of the arguments will point …
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:13 AM
2

Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:25 AM
7

I think our issues are worth caring about You must realize the truth: No movement owns those issues. They are not your issues. Caring about one issue does not make the other issue less important or prevent folks from caring about it. However, Feminists claim all gender issues under their umbrella. Feminist lobbyists are threatened by any group who would support gender issues other than them because it lessens their power to selectively support women's rights to the detriment of men. A self title…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:19 AM
3

There seem to be two kinds of feminist. There is one kind of feminist. They simply fall at various points along the slippery slope. There are the rabid man haters, and there are useful idiots who help their cause. There is one kind of racist. They simply fall at various points along the slippery slope. There are the ones who fear other races, and there are the sheet wearing hate mongers who direct the fear. In both of these you will find unfounded fears, including of rape, and dehumanization of …
/r/MensRights24/06/13 12:50 AM
24

We live in a tolerant society that doesn't tolerate intolerance. That's why I'm a scientist. I live in a society with acceptable actions in given situations, evaluated on a case by case basis with a rational and open mind. My "tolerance" is more like error bars. For example: hate speech vs something similar in jokes. It's not an issue for me. I'm rational, so I can take a joke -- There are limits, but the bar for crossing into hate speech is raised for jokes; Even higher in a comedy club.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:39 AM
5

This woman has HIV. Now, re-evaluate your stance.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:34 AM
6

You can't say "most men" unless you've at least done a survey. I'm dense too when it comes to women, and the whole "ask consent or it's rape" bullshit didn't help. I eventually learned that 'making a move' is acceptable without asking, "Can I kiss you?", so long as both parties are reciprocating and don't continue if someone says "stop". I had 6 different women climb into bed with me to snuggle for warmth, even, "It's cold, can you put your arms around me" -- Yes, I was that dense and petrified …
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter