TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

W_Edwards_Deming Archive

View 1 posts and 284 comments by W_Edwards_Deming on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

DiscussionW_Edwards_Deming/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 08:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Once is never. -Old German Saying
/r/askTRP13/12/19 06:23 PM
4

People who are drunk / high af do, but they aren't LTR material.
/r/askTRP13/12/19 04:35 PM
11

That is a terrible idea. People who are happy you called at 2am are obviously awake already and that is no kind of sign they are LTR material unless you aren't.
/r/askTRP13/12/19 03:54 PM
1

Doesn't really help. Are you saying men should date indefinitely (maybe three months) without having sex? Women who are passionate about me aren't waiting and I am not either. Plenty of fish in the sea to wait out a cold mooch who probably won't be worth it. If I was extremely religiously conservative maybe, but then we'd be getting married after the three months.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 01:05 PM
1

wtf are are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 06:09 AM
1

I am specifically here to comment on the broader topic, there is no personal aspect and I don't know you enough to be personal even if I wanted to. Further, I am absolutely not assuming you meant me, and nobody has ever used that term towards me. I shouldn't have to say this but something about the online experience requires it from time to time: Me saying things in no way implies you disagree with me. (And yes, I see the irony of the comment I made, that I was overgeneralizing myself. It doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 06:06 PM
1

The major error from both red and blue pills is an egocentric bias and assumption that "all X are like that." I was never even slightly inclined to make crude generalizations about genders because I had spent too much time around too diverse of examples. There are patterns regarding women and men, but never so crude as the pill groups often suggest. In sum: More variation within groups than between groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 01:42 AM
1

So... you are no better? There is a place where kindness and truth both live. Would you like to find it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 01:35 AM
3

Wouldn't that apply to them in most cases?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 11:00 PM
1

I am semi-frequent and have heard it before. Seems to be an insult which implies mental gymnastics and inferiority on the part of the recipient. A hamster on a wheel inside their head making up nonsense, essentially. I don't find it a very useful or specific term and was curious how you defined it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 11:00 PM
2

What is hamstering?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/19 08:48 PM
1

"AWALT" No. More variation within groups than between groups. That said, women tend to have different stereotyped interests. Further, the women who like my jokes are not the same women I engage with romantically. It is possible to share interests with a romantic partner, but let's be real. I am not sexually attracted to people like myself. I am attracted to someone who compliments my strengths, the yin to my yang.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/19 05:00 PM
1

Women benefit more from society. Totalitarian states came about quite promptly when women got the right to vote, and there are precious few female libertarians.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 04:34 PM
1

I largely agree, but was painting in broad strokes and with an anti-tech theme.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/19 01:00 AM
1

I would maximize the power people have over their own lives by gutting the state, dialing Corporate law back 200yrs or so, eliminating public education, minimum wage laws and so forth. Get back to homestead farmers who build their own houses. Something more like the Amish, Bhutan, or Feudal Europe. That would be good for birth rates, culture, and general happiness. In a word: Distributism
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 08:36 PM
1

Serial monogamy is the western style these days, but that is no kind of retirement plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 08:21 PM
1

Men are not monogamous by nature. If a super model flirts your guy when you aren't around he'll probably go for it. If your personality is a better fit he'll probably come back to you, if hers fits him better he'll probably run off. If you want loyalty when you are old find a religious conservative with a heart of gold. Plenty of nice guys out here dying of thirst...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 07:30 PM
1

Much more about rapport. Not sure how much time you have spent near a Military base but it is standard for G.I. Joe to marry a fat, tattoed ex-stripper (or similar). Tastes vary, and while there might be a rough consensus of who we'd all like to see as a swimsuit model there is no consensus of who we'd be willing to settle down with. Personality > looks, at least for LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 05:22 PM
3

Kindness makes you more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 12:35 AM
1

Degeneracy! Arranged marriage works best.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 04:12 PM
0

What are you trying to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 04:02 PM
1

Argument by hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 09:08 PM
4

People who swallow bitter pills tend not to be decent human beings. They prefer power control games to Love and Honesty (which they appear entirely unaware of). Hasty generalizations are at the root of most bigotry, sexism included.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/19 09:08 PM
1

Hasty generalizations. Not everybody is the same. Many seem to prefer "whores" (women with high N counts, high neuroticism, low conscientiousness and agreeableness). I don't even like earrings and makeup and the higher the N the lower my attraction (and the lower the woman's relationship satisfaction). Preferences exist, life is nuanced, not everybody is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 04:57 PM
2

Identity politics is generally dumb & arrogant, is it not? Generally offensive to the majority of people on earth as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 11:39 PM
1

That is my issue with it, I like the PUA aspect (at least when based on solid science) but the MRA / MGTOW stuff is almost as repellent as feminism. Identity politics in general is offputting but the gender stuff is perhaps the most so. We all have men and women in our families and an adversarial or otherwise negative attitude is obviously maladaptive. Bitter pills are bad no matter the color.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 11:38 PM
1

Now you are getting somewhere! Is that a direct quote? Who were they talking to? The Zulu are a warrior race if there ever was one, and they are inclined to crime, at least according to my Nigerian friend (and the news). That said, the Nordics were once inclined to violent raids culminating in the sacking of Ancient Rome and the creation of England. These days they seem a lot more relaxed, so obviously things can change. There is evidence of criminality running in families, just as height and sk…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 05:29 PM
1

Biological determinism is not racism. Racism is saying one race is superior to others, and discriminating accordingly. Your family tree has a great deal to tell about you, your "race" has far less. An African American kid from a family of short clumsy people will probably not be good at basketball. A chinese guy whose parents were unusually tall basketball players could end up being Yao Ming. That is what the evidence shows, not hasty generalizations about all people with a vaguely similar skin …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 04:23 PM
4

TRP has a deep vein of racialized thought that I found profoundly disturbing. Flesh that out please, what specifically do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/19 12:48 AM
1

I haven't been to India but I hear only bad things about their toileting. Cambodia is unusually poor but everywhere I went had bidets. In Europe they don't seem to be the norm but are far more common than in the U.S. Here is an article about why that might be. When I first heard about redpill I tried to like it but realized much of it was irrationally bitter, fatalistic and misogynist. That said there are big differences between men and women. Women with a high n are a bad choice for a partner, …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 05:53 PM
1

I thought about trying to sell bidets but I can't even get my friends to buy one for under $30 on Amazon. They like the idea but I think it is too alien for them. P.s. I didn't get downvotes for speaking the truth, this group is unusually open to the facts. If someone (man or woman) has more than one divorce that is a very bad sign indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 05:08 PM
1

I strongly agree about the bidet, I have had one ever since I passed the age of reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 04:32 AM
2

More to do with quality women being "a keeper" and thus not ending up with a large partner count.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 05:44 PM
1

You fantasy is not how things worked. I pay for everything when people are poorer than me. I pick people up and drop them off just to be nice. Sex is not part of that, relationships are not prostitution even if some red pills think it works like this. You think people didn't have premarital sex historically? Read Deuteronomy 22:13-23:1
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 04:51 PM
1

I heard you are better off with an engineering or science degree than an MBA because an engineer can manage a business but an MBA can't engineer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 10:01 PM
1

I am discussing specific gender differences regarding dangerous jobs. I understand that few aspire to become a garbageman. That said, better to be a garbageman than have a degree in gender studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 08:33 PM
2

Yes, they obviously do. Not all men but vastly more men than women. An expert explains some of the basics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 08:28 PM
1

They do, my understanding is that women in poor conservative nations are vastly more likely to engage in manual labor / dangerous occupations than women in wealthy liberal nations like the nordics. The poor women don't have much choice, the wealthy women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 06:49 PM
1

No. Women don't work dangerous jobs if they have a choice. They also tend not to work 80hrs a week if given a choice. I see a lot more female CEOs than I do female garbagemen.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 05:51 PM
1

A hero for the ages, right up there with Niall of the nine hostages. Edit: added two hostages
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 03:04 AM
2

The artists I know who were tortured were both writers, Dostoyevsky and Machiavelli. Frida seems more the decadent type to me, and along with Ayn Rand an example of a life ill-lived, the ugly side of feminism. I remember being asked to write an essay about my "favorite feminist" and I chose Ellen Swallow Richards. She was the kind of woman to be admired, regardless of one's gender or politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 09:01 PM
1

I actually I had my daughter read an entire book about her art and her life. Seemed culturally relevant, we keep going to Mexican restaurants where that weird monobrow is on display. Frida's life story is sort of a "how-to" not live your life. Sad, creepy, lots of affairs with notable Marxists. The art isn't so much bad as it is comical. I had her read a different book about an artist I liked, Hieromonious Bosch. His life was quieter and more devoted to family.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 06:12 PM
2

I'm not in it for the gifts. Transformational > Transactional. Edit: I'd be very disappointed if my daughter turned out like Frida Kahlo.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 05:04 PM
6

My daughter gives me pictures she draws, some less flattering than others. I give her my life. Not saying I view any of this as transactional, and my wife is too tired to do much housework anyhow. We make the kids do most of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/19 04:47 PM
1

Wow, if that is authentic it sounds like you are right. I have only heard about him from articles criticizing far less damning statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 06:51 PM
0

Are you saying Roosh was convicted of rape recently, or that you have some first hand experience? Sounds more like a false allegation...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:18 PM
1

The number of good people IRL is astounding, they simply don't spend their time being catty on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:17 PM
1

Bitterness is a terrible thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 04:02 PM
0

"Just world theory" all comes down to your locus of control and worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 03:23 AM
0

That isn't a fallacy. Read the link check the data. "Just world theory" all comes down to your locus of control and worldview. People who do not believe in a just world are not at all well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/19 12:19 AM
3

Like so many things this goes both ways in a self-reinforcing loop. Attractive people are more successful in a broad, general way. That said, kindness makes people more attractive. I think we all know we are more forgiving towards a beautiful person, but eventually things add up. Beasts can become more beautiful over time, based on good behavior, and certainly people can become less attractive over time as as well, based on bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 04:55 PM
5

First I am sorry for how your life has gone, although I assume much of it is rooted in your worldview and philosophy. Your concern about free meals is particularly bizarre. Some us us actually buy meals for men, children, and women we don't want to have sex with. Maybe you live somewhere that has pleasant women working as prostitutes in a clean, orderly and entirely legal environment. In many other places prostitutes are working illegally and are known to be quite unpleasant and dangerous. Even …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 06:47 PM
1

You didn't answer your question, did you think incivility and ethnocentrism substitutes for that? where is your data from? What source for your numbers?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 07:27 PM
1

I was pretty vague. I would like to know where you get your data from and how extensively you have reviewed other cultures. Maybe what you are saying is true in your area, could be precisely 80% of women in your area but that is certainly not the average around the world. There are more people living inside this circle than outside it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 05:50 PM
2

Either way the path to winning does not involve complaints or speculation so much as solutions. Solving problems is part of the evolutionary selection process and some of us care about our biological imperatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 05:19 PM
1

I'm not trying to say women have the power, I'm definitively saying women hold all the power in 80% of relationships. My "specific subculture" is America in 2019, where men are disposable and every women has 100+ men in her pocket begging to take her on expensive dates. I was replying to that, my apologies if I summed it up incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 05:16 PM
1

Where is this math coming from? Why the cry-hard men's rights angle? That isn't much better than feminism. Everybody needs us to man up and make any sacrifice to accomplish our biological mission.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 05:04 PM
2

Look deeper in yourself, what I read was quite clear. Men are choosing young looking women so humans are looking younger and younger, particularly in Asia. Opposite would be the guys on Papua New Guinea who have a very unusual culture of male beauty. They are NOT growing smaller and younger looking generation by generation. This tribe in Africa has a similar process and an equally bizarre look.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 04:59 PM
1

CommittedToLearning was claiming women have "80%" of the power, I am pointing to the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 04:57 PM
0

No way... Check this video out!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 02:55 PM
1

Correct, a relationship requires at least one sane, stable adult or it will not last.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 02:15 PM
1

Are you trying to say women have the vast majority of the power in mate selection? That is provably untrue, at least regarding humans overall. Maybe you feel it is true in your specific subculture? Look into Neoteny and why we have long been evolving in that direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 02:13 PM
1

You are so right, I can't emphasize this enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 11:27 AM
1

Stop being crazy. Surround yourself with good people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/19 04:37 PM
11

Rare chicken is great, now my family is immune to salmonella! p.s. If "all women are like that" why are Asian women better?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 04:24 PM
1

https://lonerwolf.com/different-types-of-love/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 04:59 AM
1

Sounds crazy. Either way Love is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/19 01:18 AM
1

You seem very focused on your looks and fatalistic about your options. Plenty of ugly broke females out there having fun with friends, finding men and starting families. Do you have a job?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 10:33 PM
1

I am not telling you to have a baby, I am telling you to start doing the hard work to make your life better. Clothes and hair and travel are not the priority right now, food and shelter and good people are. A baby is a distant possibility, not something to be accentuating now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 10:25 PM
1

I need to go out and have a baby so that I can be seen as successful...even though I'll suffer Either way you will suffer, that is part of life. Having a baby is NOT the next step however. I don't know where you are in life but I can tell that much. You talked about food and shelter, that and being surrounded by good people should be the priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 09:32 PM
1

I don't want you to be unhappy, you are already doing that. I want everyone to improve, to thrive, to learn to Love. Eudaemonia is my goal, Love for God and respect for Natural Law is my method.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 09:16 PM
1

It isn't my opinion and it very much does matter. Imagine if you were beaver, or a bird. Same rules apply, failing to find enough food, failure to make a nest, failure to find a mate, failure to reproduce or to successfully rear young capable of reproducing... all profound failures. I don't know how old you are but if you are too old to reproduce that doesn't mean you can't do something worthwhile. Finding meaning is part of thriving too, romance and raising children are simply among the most ef…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 09:03 PM
1

I don't want you to reproduce. I said you are failing to thrive as an organism. Reproducing might be a bad idea actually, given your stated priorities. Kids are hard work. A rich woman is vastly less likely to reproduce than a poor one. Evidence is overwhelming in such regards. People have priorities, if kids are not your priority you should not have one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:54 PM
1

If you are selfish you won't thrive. Everything is hard if you do it right. Your comfort zone makes you weak. Work smarter AND harder. Money doesn't make you fit and attractive, nice clothes can be bought used. Just a matter of effort shopping around for a bargain.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:41 PM
1

Nothing is free, get food security, shelter and other lower level imperatives met before considering reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/19 08:11 PM
1

I didn't shift a goalpost I told you where the goalpost is, answering your question in the OP. Nurture matters, Niger leads the world in birthrate but not in population growth. Love matters, if it doesn't matter to you that is your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 09:39 PM
1

"Stupid" is a value judgement, but based on what? Objectively a reproducing organism is having more success than an organism which fails to thrive. Prostitutes are not usually the best mothers, Charles Manson's mother was a prostitute. Gets back to R vs. K selection, because of my culture and other circumstances I provide an unusual amount of resources per child. The goal isn't simply to have an orgasm, nor even simply to reproduce. The goal is learning to have a meaningful, loving relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 08:36 PM
1

Nihilism? If you are a nihilist you are inherently wrong. Either way, biology is real and organisms are either fit or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 08:00 PM
0

Did you ask a question to understand the answer, or to tell me that you were always right? Beliefs don't matter, what I am saying applies to birds and beavers as well as to you and me. It is an objective measure of biological success.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 07:56 PM
0

Failing to mate and reproduce offspring capable of themselves reproducing is failure as a biological organism. We have instinctual biological imperatives, that is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 06:49 PM
-1

Yes, you are failing as a biological organism. Solution? Think outside the box. Consider arranged marriage, normal in many asian countries. Pay a dating service at home or travel abroad. Doing the same thing the same way hasn't worked, time to try something completely different. Keep doing that and you'll eventually solve your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 02:44 PM
2

It is good to have a healthy respect for (and skepticism regarding) the research, I hope you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 12:49 AM
1

The interview is really great. I particularly love the facial expressions on the hosts, and of course the paintings.
/r/seduction08/10/19 10:31 PM
8

Man claims to have lost his virginity to aliens
/r/seduction08/10/19 10:05 PM
2

Better not to swallow bitter pills. I tried to get interested in /r/TheRedPill due to the intensity of negativity about it, but it seemed to go beyond the science into misogyny, bitterness, and fatalism. A lot of people saying something to the effect of "all women are the same." /r/TheBluePill was no better, just pro-woman / prostitute / sexual-libertine and anti-masculinity without even trying to embrace the science. I like science and I don't like bitterness. Life is all about learning to Love…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 05:17 PM
2

It really is a matter of learning from the other. You can call us darkies, you can say we failed to consider things, but the entire purpose of this group is to interact with "the other." I found your relationship with sex dark, and your approach to data inconsiderate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 03:14 AM
2

I understand you agree with yourself, that is the point really. Your disinterest in learning from "the other" is a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 02:58 AM
2

I wasn't focused on your being uncivil, although that could be a factor. Mainly I noticed you were unwilling to change your views. An unwillingness to have your view challenged may be inferred from one or several of the following: Asking few or no genuine questions; Seeming more interested in arguing or convincing others than understanding opposing views; Refusing to make concessions that an alternate view has merit;
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 02:51 AM
0

It's almost like I am attracted to people who are different than I am, and that men are different than women!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 09:20 PM
2

I was imagining worse. Whole "conversation" was creepy, seemed more like an opportunity for him to brag about his sex life than an openness to change his view. Seems to violate the forum rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 09:17 PM
1

It isn't about where, it is about whom. You can spend your time with (or as?) Lilith in Babylon. Not my circus, not my monkeys. p.s. Religious virgins are the best in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 09:15 PM
0

You haven't had time to review all that data and I never want another eye rape from reading about your lurid details.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 06:53 PM
2

Creepy and off-topic, maybe you can pay a whore to masturbate in front of you. I will share objective data with you however: Men have better sex with emotionally unstable women ** PRJA Personality in Politics: Liberals, Conservatives, Myers-Briggs, & The Big Five ** PRJA Why Conservatives Have Better Sex Lives Than Liberals ** Source Text The data is quite clear, it is not promiscuous women who are happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 06:34 PM
5

The worse the woman's judgement the more she'll repeat a dysfunctional pattern. The downward spiral, I call it. If only she had standards...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 06:15 PM
9

For decades you have been told you are shit in bed, and having major control and anger issues, on top of just being no fun, or sense of humor, or any other redeeming trait other than your loyalty to your wallet? Sounds like major life changes are in order. Standards are one thing, but before even approaching "the other" it is best to "clean your room."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 05:29 PM
6

Why would your assumptions be educated and mine otherwise? What history are you basing things on? Certainly not mine. Standards are real, if you don't have any the predictable result explains your anger and negativity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 05:23 PM
6

Projection. You don't know me at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 05:17 PM
4

Men prefer debt-free virgins without tattoos. Those are our red-flags, if they apply to you then you can apply elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 05:08 PM
2

Money can make things easier if you are already capable of doing them, but money does not make you capable. Some guy with his pants sagging and no shirt is out there having more passionate sex than most billionaires. It isn't about money it is about "game," your personality. Anxiety and depression are positively correlated with wealth. Birth rates are far higher amongst the poor than the rich. Give up on money as a solution, work on personality and expand approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 02:59 PM
5

I notice a wild overestimation of the power of money and a mild overestimation of the power of looks when it comes to men's dating opportunities. Not just here, but in general. I was just counseling a single guy who has about average looks regarding his online dating profile. He has never had a serious romantic relationship and it isn't about looks or money (he has considerable savings and a steady income). It is all about his attitude and willingness to flirt. He spends his time editing his pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 09:12 PM
5

Some of us have much higher standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 01:38 PM
3

"if you're disgusted by pussy-hair you're probably gay" How is disliking hair gay? The last thing I am attracted to is a fat hairy man. I'd rather a bald headed woman than one with a hairy body.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 08:58 PM
2

I am all about paying for baby. The children are our future.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 10:54 PM
-17

"making republicans look bad." Yes, you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 09:48 PM
-18

Some of us vote Republican.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 09:30 PM
-17

Baby comes first.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 08:59 PM
1

More info on what you mean by an "egalitarian household?"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 07:22 PM
1

You missed the point, Tommy Lee is the manwhore, Ziona Chana is The Man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 01:48 PM
1

Those are his wives, the mothers of his children.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 02:50 AM
1

Opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/16 02:05 AM
1

I am not a terper, I am talking about basic biology. Being a musician in no way qualifies someone as an Alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 11:20 PM
1

Alpha is synonymous with leader. Some of them have access to resources because they [...] lead. Meanwhile all sources discuss the Alphas access to resources and mating. Leadership is different, often more politics than health and mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 10:51 PM
3

I dispute being called red pill. I am well outside that box. Biological realist yes, but without the sort of "masculinist" / mgtow attitudes which are often rightfully described as misogyny. Our mothers and sisters and wives and daughters deserve better than a red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 10:24 PM
1

"Alpha is synonymous with leader - not awesome entity with access to resources. Some of them have access to resources because they have followers and lead." What you are saying is internally inconsistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 10:20 PM
1

Tommy Lee That is your idea of an Alpha? This is mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 10:03 PM
2

They are real concepts from biology / ethology that apply to humans as well as other social animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 09:57 PM
2

Hardly anybody who thinks of themselves as redpill in a reddit forum would be an Alpha. Alphas are by definition those with the access to resources, those who produce the most children. Access to mates is part of that, but fecundity is a clearer indicator than orgy participation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 09:27 PM
2

If we are talking about a real, biological Alpha then they are by definition looking to reproduce. Dominant males are favored to father offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 09:19 PM
2

I meant Conservative in the sense of behavior, not any specific political party. Alpha males don't want promiscuous mates.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 08:47 PM
1

Betas want monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 06:19 PM
4

Alphas wants something different than Omegas. Real men (Alphas) want Conservative RPW. Omegas want Whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 05:22 PM
15

Well of course, and I doubt anyone would be complaining if the new Ghostbusters starred Sigourney Weaver, Annie Potts and Rick Moranis.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 08:49 PM
6

Make them into lesbian lovers and/or trans-munks!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 08:32 PM
9

Maybe they'll remake Alvin & bros as girls and Dave can be Diane.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 08:08 PM
4

How else could she eat that much?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/16 07:35 PM
7

There were two fighting over her in the video...
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/16 07:26 PM
1

Neocons are centrists IMO, isn't Hillary a neocon? I see little difference between her and McCain, Romney, Obama, Bush, Lindsey Graham or etc. I am a Ron Paul Republican who was just now agreeing with a Bernie supporter about Horseshoe theory, that we are more similar to each other than we are to centrist authoritarians who seem to crave endless war overseas and a police state at home.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/16 10:04 PM
1

It is here, I recommend the peer-reviewed article in particular.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/16 08:24 PM
1

I get that, my rebuttal is that the center is Authoritarian and evil.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 01:01 PM
1

Hard for me to relate to as I see the center as irrational and the extremes as having more in common with each other than they do with the moderates. Have you heard of the horseshoe effect?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/16 03:34 AM
7

She should be in Prison for assault, not just fired and sued.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/16 01:38 PM
5

How does the far-right fit into this? What are you defining them as? The far-right for me in the US is Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan, and the far-right in Europe would be those who oppose the EU and immigration. None of that strikes me as particularly crazy, even if you disagree with it. The real problem in my eyes comes in the form of Centrist Authoritarians and Marxists (if there is any difference). My friends on the far-left who focus on environmentalism and ending poverty are pretty reasonable s…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/16 01:36 PM
3

Plausible. Scientifically there are two main breeding strategies, one I call "feathering the nest" and the other "the shotgun effect." Basically each of us chooses to either pour our time and resources into a smaller number of children OR to create as many children as possible with as little investment per child as possible. In nature some animals spend a lot of time building nests, feeding and protecting their young. Those same animals sometimes have long term relationships with their mate and …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:41 PM
3

Men definitely behave badly. I don't think those who interrupted her were being polite, I think what she was saying was unimportant and out of place. Talk to Hillary Clinton about why she accepts money from Muslim Kings who repress women (like the Saudis). Don't waste the time of sports fans and talented powerful women like Holly Holm (or Rhonda Rousey for that matter).
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 10:50 PM
15

Kindergarten is right, this was an Ultimate Fighting event, Kindergarten rules do not apply. Context matters, and that girl was a $#!+#*@) for trying to talk about feminism to a woman who could beat the hell out of everyone in the room. Infantile mewling narcissism is for weak parasites, not for strong empowered women.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 04:31 PM
1

Post-scarcity slaves? Post scarcity caviar? Post-scarcity gold and silver? What rot, these guys have been watching too much Star Trek. Even on Star Trek there were dilithium crystals.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 04:57 PM
0

Whores are not sexy to me, they are depressing and stressful and unfullfilling. The guys I know who claim to prefer the whores have a bad time of it. Virgins have a better track record (and far better personalities).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 04:44 PM
4

It is nice that you are so moderate in your moderation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 02:09 AM
1

This topic is weird to me as I know of more than one "stay-at-home dad" with a high-earner wife. My guess is if things go wrong they won't be getting any alimony due to the realities of sex-based discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:07 PM
1

Rich people have the ear of their congressman (and his hand in their pocket). Poor people are ignored as much as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 05:18 PM
8

Gay marriage for you then?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/15 05:35 PM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 06:07 PM
10

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 02:49 AM
1

Vodka tastes sweet to me at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/15 12:49 AM
10

Same story with "The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:42 AM
9

It is very logical, and I abandoned "feminism" years ago when I realized it was not "the radical notion that women are people" but instead some sort of Cultural Marxism designed to create conflict and destroy science, culture and family. You are part of that process and exemplify it well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:22 AM
4

People don't usually need to be taught to enjoy sex. Has more to do with finding the right partner. Glad to hear you are not intending to curse these poor girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:20 AM
8

Justice involves due process, and does not allow for a life sentence or death penalty for fondling sleeping people as a kid. What you have been saying about the harm to the victims is also irrational and hurtful to anyone who has suffered sexual abuse. If you were allowed your way this family would indeed be permanently scarred and our society would be as bad as Saudi Arabia (or worse, if that is possible). You are why I am now anti-feminist (despite having been raised as a feminist).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:17 AM
2

They are unjust, irrational and harmful to all parties concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:14 AM
11

You said a lot more than that. Telling people they are permanently scarred, will never enjoy sex, are dis-empowered and etc. hurts them far more than getting groped whilst they sleep. Read this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:10 AM
3

I think they would prefer to castrate him and/or see him brutally and repeatedly raped in prison. He did grab the titties of a sleeping girl, after all...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:07 AM
7

He should be in prison. Before or after a trial? If he goes to prison what good will that do anyone? Those girls will be scarred if they listen to someone talking like you are, I hope you and your damaging worldview will never be a part of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 12:03 AM
8

Never heard of this family before, but it seems very perverse to suggest that these girls who were fondled while asleep have been "robb[ed] of a healthy view of sex and disempower[ed] from enjoying sex in the future." Calling the modern US a "Patriarchy" is also quite bizarre. Is there some nation you don't describe as a "Patriarchy?" If the US is a "Patriarchy" what is Saudi Arabia or Vatican city? The guy is being criminally investigated, what more do you want? I want you not to give stigma an…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 11:58 PM
7

I am a nice guy, but watch out for the others. As Shakespeare said: Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Everybody manipulates everyone all the time, it is about doing it in an enlightened way, not in trying to pretend we aren't doing it or it won't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 06:35 AM
5

Everyone manipulates, it is the results and intentions that matter. By their fruits, you shall know them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 04:51 AM
5

Be ready, real life has few if any "safe spaces."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 04:50 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5lYXaVkA0U
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 02:31 AM
2

That doesn't fit. Insecure is not an insult to the ability to be a provider, it is an insult to his mental fortitude. Men are expected to have mental fortitude, women do not have the same expectation. Slut would not be an equivalent, indeed people and cultures whose gender roles are more extreme tend to accuse women of infidelity with greater frequency and place less trust in their ability to resist advances. It is an expectation, much as men are expected to be violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 06:59 PM
4

That is a question, but in sparring (and apparently IRL outside the ring) she holds her own amazingly well. Her big test in that direction will be Cris Cyborg, who is basically a man after all the roids she has absorbed over the years.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/15 06:11 PM
-9

Ronda Rousey.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/15 05:14 PM
1

/r/iamverysmart
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 02:57 AM
2

I know you are but what am I? Some info for you. Set aside the nonsense for a moment and consider how things really work. People who conform to your asexual preferences breed far less than average. People with distinct genders based upon their biological sex (like muslims for example) breed far more than average. It is quite obvious which will prevail.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 06:08 PM
3

organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests That doesn't sound like equality to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 09:49 PM
3

I even think it would be a good thing if humans had no secondary sex characteristics at all. This is the kind of disturbed opinion that tells me some people not only do not understand basic biology and the way things work, they oppose it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 09:44 PM
1

I tell my boys that smaller people are to be restrained, but bigger people (like a big fat woman) are to be defended against with force, at least until they get a chance to run away!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/15 05:59 PM
2

This is Gold, and has often worked for me.
/r/seduction30/03/15 03:53 PM
0

There is no place in my life for negative people, good advice comes from good people. I know your want TRP to be research orientated and maybe you can help make it that way. Be aware that wise and thoughtful people tend to avoid disrespectful, arrogantly ignorant egoism. If you can transcend that you might be on your way to a place I might like to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 06:44 AM
1

You don't want to know what TRP is about, but rather have more people tell you what you already believe. Very far off the mark. I thought I was going to like TRP it because people I dislike (radfems) hated it so much. I went there and disliked it a great deal. Someone I know (IRL) had the identical experience. We are very different people, but our take-away was the same: Red pill is full of bitter betas and omegas who were not interested in (nor providing) useful advice. I learned about the heig…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 01:16 AM
1

If it is all about exerting power than the dream girl of a red piller must be a low-self esteem / low value omega who he can manipulate the feelings of and mistreat before discarding. Sounds sociopathic to me, why not just stick to prostitutes if there is to be an absence of honor or respect? In reality the zeitgeist over in redpill is not one of Natural Artisoi, more the opposite, it is one of wannabe parasites uninterested in the truth. My experience there was of pointing out research (that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:37 PM
1

If they didn't respond positively to TRP, then the philosophy would quickly die out. ...then why do radfems exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:23 PM
1

The reason TRP enjoys any popularity is precisely because of how straight and clear-cut the information is presented. This is where we disagree. I see it as a circlejerk / feedback loop somewhat like SRS, where people who are otherwise punked by life have a place they can sound off and behave arrogantly. TRP is made up mostly of guys with poor relationship experiences. This is where we agree. You seem to think some of them are quite successful (by some metric), and maybe that is true. None of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 05:26 PM
1

If it were genuinely inaccurate and ineffective, it wouldn't enjoy the popularity it currently does. That is fallacious reasoning, an appeal to the people (and a poor one at that). I and others I know IRL have gone to /r/TheRedPill and been greatly disappointed with the quality of the people and advice there. As I have been saying, it was like talking to some bitter dateless slob in middle school, not like taking advice from the more successful men I have known (who LOVE women and tend to say ni…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 05:12 PM
1

I am unconvinced it works, it reminds me of the attitudes of unsuccessful, unlikeable guys I have met, and is nothing like the most successful alphas. Certainly it has nothing to do with why my life has worked out so wonderfully. I am not saying it is all wrong, nor that the feminist form of chauvinism is any better. Chauvinism is unfortunate no matter what race, gender, creed or etc. practices it. I don't see it as correlated with success. It all honesty I haven't looked at /r/seduction in a ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 04:50 PM
1

There is a problem with becoming a bitter loser. The right choice is to learn how to become a winner, or at least to become humbly resigned to ones fate. Bitterness and harsh sexism makes problems bigger and solutions less likely. A relaxed, confident and generous approach works best. A lot of these guys simply need to improve themselves, and would benefit from forums like /r/fitness, /r/amiugly, /r/seduction or even /r/darkenlightenment. The redpill seems to engage in authentic misogyny, someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 04:32 PM
-1

You make a good point, my understanding of redpill is that they are bitter losers tired of being punked by life. Kinda like SRS, come to think of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 06:48 PM
1

Different women want different things. I am not telling you what you want, I am describing a way of looking at how women overall select mates. There are other ways of looking at it which can also be valid. Some discuss women's menstrual cycles and their preference for masculine men when ovulating, others focus on how women in safe urban areas prefer effeminate men while women in dangerous regions prefer men with sharp, frightening features. There is also a dichotomy between a thin, rugged "love …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 06:46 PM
2

I don't like any genital mutilation, hormones, implants or anything of that sort. Even a woman with breast implants is unattractive to me, let alone a man. I like what Bill Burr has to say about plastic surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 05:20 PM
3

Not being able to reproduce is huge, as are the other effects of testosterone deficiency. When you say "men" you mean something different than when I say "men."
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 09:50 PM
3

Men are not born with two X chromosomes. I am not an expert and am not sure what I would call someone who resembles a male but has XX chromosomes, but "man" and "woman" would not be on the list.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 09:20 PM
4

that's not my problem It very specifically is your problem. I don't know what we are even debating, since your agree to my core point about the Chromosomes and the physical realities. Once those facts are confirmed naught but sass appears to remain. Chromosomal anomalies are a real, if obscure issue. Sports are the least of their concerns, but being sexually mutilated by overzealous doctors is certainly an issue. Another wrong is when children who have ordinary biologies are given hormonal thera…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 09:05 PM
4

I don't dispute your sources, I dispute your attitude. None of your sources disprove kindergarten level biology. Male is male, female is female, even if it is hard to tell the difference. Address the points made by my comedy video, if you dare.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 08:52 PM
2

fucking fucking I'm astounded you could even spell "eunuch." Being rude makes me not talk to you, and is extraordinarily unpersuasive.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 08:39 PM
1

The dictionary also says so... If they were rational maybe they would focus on logic instead of hysterics.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 06:36 PM
2

In order to have a debate, terms must be defined. “If you wish to converse with me, define your terms.” Voltaire Personally I like to use a neutral source (like webster), but the most important thing is to have some sort of shared meaning. Otherwise you are screaming at a wall, and little more. That said I expected no debate on an issue like this, which seems to be emotionally driven with no basis in rationality. If a man wears a dress and says he is a woman he may be guilty of deception, but it…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 06:24 PM
9

I disagree. I would say that those I disagree with philosophically tend towards irrationality, and that insisting on accuracy renders their arguments impotent. In other words: Whoever Controls the Language Controls the Debate
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 12:08 AM
8

Equivocation, son.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 09:28 PM
24

It is not a phobia when someone disagrees with you. Phobia an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/15 08:50 PM
1

TRP is much the same thing as SRS, they are like two sides of the same bitter loser beta coin. TRP is more intellectual to be sure, but no more reasonable regarding gender and sexual politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 07:41 PM
1

Good attitude! Don't be afraid to fail! It can't work out every time, maybe not even most of the time. You will only succeed if you are willing to make mistakes and learn from them.
/r/seduction11/12/14 09:57 PM
1

It works like this: 1. Look at girls 2. Eye contact If she does anything other than smile or talk to you, give up. IIF she smiles: 3. Talk to her. Start small and work your way up to... 4. ask for number, make a date.
/r/seduction11/12/14 09:28 PM
1

You will suffer terrible regret until you grow the balls to talk to girls.
/r/seduction11/12/14 08:56 PM
4

none of them have been shorter than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 10:07 PM
0

I cited a source, which you are not. I was also on topic, which you are not. Suffice to say I am unimpressed.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 08:27 PM
0

As a layman I am making use of the broader term, not the precise South African legal jargon. In any event you are distracting from the topic, height and the range in which it is beneficial to dating. Some are suggesting there is no upward limit, while I differ, based upon the research.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 05:39 PM
0

Source trumps loud mouth. Read and learn. Murder occurs when one human being unlawfully kills another human being.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 12:16 PM
1

He was convicted of an illegal killing. I am not a South African lawyer and used the term "murder" in the broadest, most general way. My usage was correct, and you are off-topic. The point is that even degenerates can pull better girls than giants, so long as they present themselves correctly. Sad but true.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 09:25 PM
1

Reality is out there, and yes, I do feel smarter. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 08:53 PM
1

He is a rich successful athlete. Oscar Pistorius did better than Shaq, and he is a murderous (moral and physical) cripple. Across populations and throughout cultures the research says women prefer men to be taller, but not a lot taller. Giants are not the sexiest men out there, stereotypically.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 08:43 PM
1

...if the women were even shorter they'd go for the shorter guy. There is a .limit to how much taller they want the man to be. Usually just a few inches.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 07:33 PM
1

Made for you.
/r/seduction09/10/14 07:37 PM
2

Pheremones. I have had the same compliment, but I have also noticed that when very stressed I sweat a lot and put off a completely different (and unappealing) smell. People smell good or bad not only based on esoteric subtleties (like their immune system or genetic suitability for mating), but also based on their mood and recent life events. Cologne only serves to mask that, showers (and a corresponding change of mood) actually succeeds.
/r/seduction09/10/14 04:25 PM
10

I do the same but always put some on my ass as well.
/r/seduction09/10/14 04:19 PM
3

Making out and being passionate tends to make them wet in my experience.
/r/seduction24/09/14 01:37 PM
1

Except not.
/r/PussyPass07/08/14 06:13 AM
-2

Look up the definition of sodomy, engage brain, try again.
/r/PussyPass07/08/14 02:18 AM
1

I hear you, but the law does not dictate reality or morality.
/r/PussyPass07/08/14 02:14 AM
1

Hardly forcible sodomy, is it?
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 02:48 PM
2

Actually no. Did you read the case? The first teen testified in February of his persistent flirtations toward Altice The youngest was 16 (legal in most states and most places around the earth). I would be disturbed and might want the teacher fired, but no charges were it my 16-yr old daughter who persistently flirted and initially felt proud about the incident. Life in Prison?! Pure evil. The boy said during his testimony he initially felt proud about his relationship with Altice, but that later…
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 02:45 PM
-8

Incorrect, age of consent varies wildly, and regardless the laws of man do not dictate reality.
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 01:56 AM
-10

So... she held them down against their will and ass raped them? If not, forcible sodomy strikes me as hyperbole. She should face no charges whatsoever from my reading of the case. Regrets after the fact do not a rape make.
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 01:44 AM
1

I would certainly read your essay.
/r/seduction17/07/14 09:17 AM
1

Done.
/r/seduction17/07/14 09:14 AM
1

Excellent. I was put off at first, but you grew on me. Normally people on reddit who disagree quickly degenerate into name calling and are unable to rise to the level you are at (achieving mutual understanding) after a difference has occurred. That is an important moral intelligence or sign of character, and is far more important than the IQ which people so often prize.
/r/seduction17/07/14 09:13 AM
1

Interesting. I am Catholic however, and feel he overemphasizes choice and underemphasizes Natural Law. Life is infinite with moving boundaries, but there is always Natural Law (the Laws of God). The important thing is never confusing common law or maladaptive cultural constructs for Natural Law.
/r/seduction16/07/14 11:14 PM
1

FYI these replies to yourself are usually not read, as they don't trigger an inbox message. I only know about them because I was stalking your profile (considering adding you to my friends list, is this a primary account or a throwaway?)
/r/seduction16/07/14 11:07 PM
1

I like most of that. I oppose "Progressivism" and consider myself Anti-Feminist, but not out of dislike for women or a belief they are inferior. Rather it is the sort of things you see in /r/ShitRedditSays and /r/TumblrInAction I oppose. Hateful authoritarian opinions and actions, people who say things like "Only whites can be racist" or "men can't comment regarding abortion" or etc. Talk of "Privilege" and the like. I think your vision for a community is admirable, but I think this is the wrong…
/r/seduction16/07/14 10:43 PM
1

It is not the socialization which I focused on, but the biology. It is starting to seem like we agree on much of this. I am not a fan of games either. Eye contact and smiling is not a game, but rather a way of connecting. Sexuality and perhaps marriage and reproduction may be an end goal, but one we tend to approach gradually with many reciprocal steps, leveling up the relationship. Jumping too far too fast makes others uncomfortable. A kiss for example might be quite appropriate after a number …
/r/seduction16/07/14 10:09 PM
1

I see. Some do just that, but I strive not to. I tend to agree with Buber about the spiritual value of "I and Thou" communications. I am a Natural Law philosopher and Perennialist who rejects much about modern society and culture, that is an opinion which we share.
/r/seduction16/07/14 10:03 PM
1

Males have little to risk and much to gain from sexual experiences with a variety of women. Females on the other hand have much to lose and little to gain from the same plan, and are better suited by committed relationships, or even celibacy. I also agree we are similar enough to communicate. Where I disagree is that if you and I were both single and mutually attractive that the direct approach on my part would be best. I would start with eye contact and smiles, not notes or cartoons, and I am c…
/r/seduction16/07/14 09:43 PM
1

YOUR end game. I don't have an end game in this conversation, I expected you to stop talking a long time ago. I am simply humoring you, and to be honest while you come across as arrogant you are a pleasant enough conversationalist. Certainly nicer than most people I disagree with so fundamentally. Nobody can define reality accurately. That seems rather a subjectivist view. I would say that while we may have subjective opinions and they may be accurate or inaccurate, the objective measure is if t…
/r/seduction16/07/14 09:39 PM
1

You were talking about genders being the same. Even if you don't consider that a leftist opinion, the rest of what I said still stands. It is an anti-science / anti-reality opinion. New ideas are not always better.
/r/seduction16/07/14 09:32 PM
1

You think reality is bullshit and your own bullshit is reality, I understand. That is required in order to believe in much of the leftist worldview. You have your conclusions premade and try to argue in favor of them whilst rejecting all evidence. This is the opposite of science, and impresses only those unaware of Natural Law and the scientific method.
/r/seduction16/07/14 07:18 PM
1

ಠ_ಠ
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:33 AM
1

I strive to help others, regardless of their intellect. That is a moral imperative for me. Sorry you feel surly.
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:32 AM
1

You are very alien. That has been a theme. I do not hate you, and do not mean to be unfair or unkind. Reality is still here however, despite your best attempts.
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:29 AM
1

I know you are but what am I. Good grief, I thought you intended to come across as intelligent?
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:23 AM
1

honking crap Not my words, but certainly one way to describe this post.
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:21 AM
1

Argument by hypocrisy or simply an attempt to become more human? Whatever you are doing, it is not communicating in a clear and intelligent manner.
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:19 AM
1

I have no dead ends. Mine is endless love and flourishing. Eudaemonia.
/r/seduction16/07/14 02:00 AM
1

Rethink your approach and analysis.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:58 AM
1

What did you see?
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:56 AM
1

Feminism is shit I saw some very odd claims you made about the spine, and promptly ignored them. Evidence would be of mild interest (spines are kind of off topic, and not an area of interest for me or this forum).
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:53 AM
1

I can't insult you, I don't know you. Provide any evidence for your claims, at your leisure. Until then I (and others) will continue to scoff.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:51 AM
1

Inaccurate, and not unusually so. No attack from me, just trying to engage you at your level. I will continue to do so if you are ready...
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:44 AM
2

You do not not know what I am... I suspect you do not know what you are either.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:41 AM
1

Some of us are not blind. All we know about you is what you say, and we disrespect that.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:28 AM
1

Evidence has been requested yet not provided...
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:27 AM
5

I'm no sure I even want any children. Doesn't sound like a woman to me. Maybe a confused little girl. ...more like an alien.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:26 AM
3

A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:17 AM
0

So very weak... I am ashamed for you.
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:11 AM
1

logic exists. evidence too...
/r/seduction16/07/14 01:02 AM
1

Dunning-Kruger.
/r/seduction16/07/14 12:08 AM
1

"different"
/r/seduction15/07/14 04:58 PM
1

Is that because women and men are in any way different?
/r/seduction15/07/14 04:30 PM
1

If you need to change yourself because YOU need to change yourself, yes you will get more people interested in you. That is the entire point of this forum. you're not participating in a joint discussion with women This doesn't seem like a fair assumption. Maybe /r/TheRedPill is that way, but not the guys here. my perspective is sound. ...based on what evidence? Males and females are different, that is basic biology 101.
/r/seduction15/07/14 11:56 AM
1

Brace yourself, scary movie time.
/r/seduction15/07/14 11:49 AM
1

I usually avoid girls. Its been almost 5 years since I've even kissed a girl. women and men are not in any way different ...you should try being gay.
/r/seduction15/07/14 11:47 AM
1

You are very confident, but it is hubris to say you have not been strongly influenced by your society, or that its structure is random. "Random" is a term overused by young people in our culture to address that which they do not understand. As a functionalist I don't believe in "notions without warrant," everything has some basis or another, even if it turns out to be maladaptive. I hope you are not seriously claiming that all criticisms you produce are going to be substantive, even before you h…
/r/seduction15/07/14 11:24 AM
1

The direct approach combined with food bribery... I like it! The science behind this plan.
/r/seduction15/07/14 11:01 AM
3

You tell her, Ronald!
/r/seduction15/07/14 12:05 AM
3

our society leaves no child untouched by it There are lots of other societies, across time and around the globe. We can (and do) analyze what is different and where there are common threads. For example men prize youth while women prize the honor and support a man brings to her children. Both prize health, symmetry and waist-hip ratios. Smell and taste are also vital, particularly for women, while men tend to be more visual. You can't. Can't is a bad word. Never say can't :P
/r/seduction15/07/14 12:01 AM
2

Everything requires an army of men to study scientifically. Sexuality, biology, evolutionary and social psychology, Ethology and so forth. I find sexual attraction fascinating and have studied it at university, independently and also in applied settings ;) If there is a ted talk you want to reference I might watch it, but the things I am talking about are rooted in science. There are certainly things said in /r/seduction that might be wrong, but I haven't heard one pointed out yet. You do seem a…
/r/seduction14/07/14 11:56 PM
2

it's not what you think it is How do you know that? Your paradigm is wrong On what basis? You even admit it works, which is a rather important bit of evidence in favor. What more compelling evidence is against?
/r/seduction14/07/14 11:47 PM
1

:) A successful relationship can be a lot of work, and certainly requires the sort of biological and interpersonal skills I am advocating. Research I have read made the claim that arranged marriages (often contractual in nature) tend to be happier and more successful in the long term. Why do you keep suggesting that men and women ought to behave in a similar manner? On what basis? As far as what I do with women, I am honest, but not direct. A gradual process of escalatory and reciprocal flirting…
/r/seduction14/07/14 11:39 PM
3

Why do you think a lewd and crude note would be other than direct? Why do you think men and women are equals? Obviously I am saying that a sophisticated, intelligent and sexy male would use biological behaviors and interpersonal skills to advance a sexual relationship, like all other animals would do. An unintelligent, unattractive and ultimately unsuccessful male would more likely employ the method you seem to advocate. What do you think of arranged marriage? How about my suggestion that online…
/r/seduction14/07/14 11:31 PM
1

I didn't bring up that example as a strawman, but as a well known problem women have: being lewdly propositioned by unintelligent losers. You are saying that you are intelligent, that you proposition others directly (often in writing) and in a frank manner rather than traditional flirting, and that intelligent men would do the same. It is not a strawman to point out that the truth is the inverse of your claim. I am unaware of females who "only want to have sex." They sound like they would have a…
/r/seduction14/07/14 11:25 PM
3

Here we come to a problem. Men who directly proposition females ("hey baby, wanna doink" perhaps combined with a photo of their penis) tend to be unusually unintelligent and unsuccessful. Men (and women) who are seen as unusually attractive, intelligent and successful on the other hand tend to employ those methods most supported by research on human sexual attraction and mating habits. That is what we come here to learn, teach and discuss. My advice to you would be to emphasize online dating whe…
/r/seduction14/07/14 11:08 PM
4

People who fail to manipulate are indeed likely to annoy. Those who succeed have deftly handled a situation, and are likely to be rewarded. You seem to prize written or verbal communication above body language, eye contact, pheromones and other subtle cues? I also value honesty, but those alternate means of communication are no less honest than words, are they? By your own self-description you are a very unusual female, wouldn't you agree? Do you think the approach you recommend for propositioni…
/r/seduction14/07/14 10:53 PM
4

Ha! There are many types of intelligence. Emotional Intelligence and I.Q., among others. Sexual attractiveness is another, separate category and few men emphasize high intelligence as sexually attractive in a woman. To the contrary, many prize youth and inexperience. Being frank with women is quite often a terrible idea, even (perhaps especially) if they are high intelligent. Rather than some sort of dispassionate business proposal or resume handed over, mutual sexual attraction is a process of …
/r/seduction14/07/14 10:45 PM
1

...Opposite of someone I'd want my daughter talking to, let alone dating. IMO "feminists" harm women and girls in a variety of ways, not least of which by the sort of males they associate with.
/r/askTRP25/06/14 08:47 AM
1

Nothing is equal, not even two identical twins. If you are not interested in a guy tell him so, or at least avoid him. Your friend sounds bad, why do you like the kind of guy? I can't say I agree with everything everybody says here, but the basic idea is applied biology / evolutionary psychology. Accept reality for what it is, then figure out what you want and how to get it.
/r/askTRP25/06/14 08:37 AM
1

Maybe I am not redpill for saying this, but it has to be said: Women are not the problem, backbiters, liars and selfish people are. Dude messed up hard, but if he owned up to what he did it does not require an ass-whuppin'. Learn from this, and be VERY careful who you trust.
/r/askTRP05/06/14 06:41 PM
-1

What is a gorram bible?
/r/askTRP05/06/14 05:15 PM
12

How do you know it was him?
/r/askTRP05/06/14 02:03 PM
1

Move on, relationships require reciprocity.
/r/seduction14/04/14 11:19 AM
1

Different women want different things. I am not telling you what you want, I am describing a way of looking at how women overall select mates. There are other ways of looking at it which can also be valid. Some discuss women's menstrual cycles and their preference for masculine men when ovulating, others focus on how women in safe urban areas prefer effeminate men while women in dangerous regions prefer men with sharp, frightening features. There is also a dichotomy between a thin, rugged "love …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 02:52 PM
2

A Beta or Omega would not be "hot" to a female Alpha. Females have more investment in their offspring because they have to carry them to term. Alpha and Beta females respect biological imperatives. Only an Omega female would disregard that and take what they could get, due to their lowliness of status.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 02:33 PM
1

An alpha female would not wish to mate with betas or omegas. That is an inefficient use of her parental resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 12:39 PM
2

Being a billionaire is counter-indicated. There is a negative correlation between sex and money. Forty-year olds in the ghetto are w-a-y more likely to be banging teenagers left and right than somebody like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 09:13 AM
1

I don't believe it. Cougars are out there!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 08:43 AM
1

Physical attractiveness Inexperience / innocence (not jaded, more virginal, willing to learn) Reliving / reclaiming their own youth More breeding years / eggs left Age based dominance Instinct I think it comes down to some combination of these, with preferences regarding "virgin v. whore" or other dichotomies ranging across the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/14 08:40 AM
2

Not at all. I listed a variety of important characteristics separating primative man from modern humans. I specified no special relationships between those characteristics. My apologies for any confusion. Based upon Golbecki Tepe, Tsodilo Hills and other excavation sites I would say with confidence that organized religion creates civilization, and predates agriculture. Trade is so basic you can find trade-like behaviors amongst chimps and other non-human animals. ...world's oldest profession?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 03:21 PM
1

...except not. Lack of extensive contact is what defines them as uncontacted. Most of them have had some contact, none of them has had extensive contact. When they get extensively contacted many of them die or leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 02:54 PM
1

We do not have "modern primitives". (Andamanese are sort of an exception) ...Uncontacted people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 02:29 PM
2

who says we couldn't trade prior to farming? not me, that sounds absurd. I imagine people were trading quite early. The amazon is fertile, that doesn't seem to have necessitated more contact. Same story with the Andaman islands. To the contrary I imagine the Inuit and saharan desert dwellers and the like in inhospitable conditions would be more inclined to trade (out of necessity). One of the explanations for the success of Europeans and other Northern peoples is that winters forced us to preser…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 12:37 PM
2

...why would people be anything other than isolated tribes prior to trade, organized religion, agriculture, and the like?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 12:22 PM
14

Some people like to pretend that primitive man acted the way they wish people acted. Be it primitive communism, Merrie Olde England, "the good old days," or wild claims about prehistoric orgies, the common thread is people projecting their fantasies onto the past. It is ridiculous, because we DO have modern primitives. The Bushmen of Africa, the Adamanese Negrito, various tribes of the Amazon who have avoided contact. By studying them we get a good idea of how things worked, and how various they…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 06:44 AM
6

Wrong coffee shop. Some coffee shops (like starbucks) are places people line up to grab a to go cup and hurry back to work. Those are the wrong kind. You need one where students and artists lounge around websurfing and discussing philosophy and politics. One where they have poetry readings and live folk music and who knows what all (I haven't been to one like this since my buddy dragged me into one looking to pick up hipster chicks ;) Something like a Parisian cafe.
/r/seduction21/02/14 03:01 PM
6

Try a coffee shop. p.s. I like rain
/r/seduction21/02/14 01:55 PM
6

He is correct, either do this or travel more. Your old habits will not do.
/r/seduction27/01/14 02:38 PM
26

Pace things so nobody drinks too much and gets sick or passes out or etc.
/r/seduction11/01/14 12:31 PM
6

Those people are tarded.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 04:22 PM
2

I think it was sincere, but that you were trying to hard w the texts that night. Give her a bit of time.
/r/seduction31/08/13 09:49 AM
1

e-Lynching
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter