TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WannabeLeagueBowler Archive

View 14 posts and 843 comments by WannabeLeagueBowler on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Women divorce because it entitles them to the money without the strings attached. Men being happier and healthier is a statistical artifact of not having your money taken away.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 09:07 PM
44

Some people are saying "taxes", but even that isn't really true for most people because they no longer qualify for any of the low income benefits a "single" mother would get, like college subsidies.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 08:05 PM
5

You're not going to find many men who would prefer work over the gym.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 07:35 PM
2

If Bob Hope was a comedian, he would have toured with Mayer Amschel Rothschild.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 07:27 PM
10

I always think people must have more money than brains to ignore class privilege the way they do, as if all other privilege doesn't disappear into irrelevancy. It's the one privilege social justice warriors won't talk about.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 05:59 PM
-19

It was illegal for your friend to drink alcohol at college age. Am I supposed to feel sorry if you become a drug dealer and get shot? It goes with the territory. In fact it's what's supposed to happen. The problem is we don't see it this way for women and girls. Women and girls drink alcohol, illegally, in order to shed responsibility for what they do next. Have sex with guys they just met. You can't even call it victim blaming.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 05:01 PM
20

It costs $500 to speak to a doctor for 30 seconds. A hospital can find a way to make circumcision cost a million dollars if they need it to. Trump signed an executive order requiring the medical industry to post prices, but Biden revoked it, so we'll never know.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 04:43 PM
10

I don't think journalists and medical people have to be paid to promote it. They would do it anyway.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 04:41 PM
3

The fact that female circumcision ever gets mentioned at all is solely for the purpose of justifying male circumcision.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:28 PM
1

But Vermont never reduced rape. It was always low.
/r/MensRights23/06/24 03:26 PM
1

I see a difference between groups and one on one. Most groups don't seem genuine. One on one is much stronger. Like Beavis and Butthead. Anytime you see one, you know the other is not far behind.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 03:23 AM
1

No, he's right. The CDC considers rape to be a disease epidemic. They also believe gun ownership to be a disease epidemic. Unless it's rich people with private security, or politicians who bomb entire countries.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 03:15 AM
3

I don't blame women for looking out for themselves. I blame you for selling out men.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 03:07 AM
6

Dude looks like a lady from Mrs Doubtfire, a movie about a man who dresses up like a woman for the benefits.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:37 PM
3

One again the problem is not the feminist. Of course she says those things. The problem is every single scientist for going along with it. Anytime you see "peer review", these are the peers.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:36 PM
-20

Women and girls were below the status of cats and kittens. They were not considered worthy of sacrifice. This is just another way they were oppressed.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:28 PM
2

According to this map, it would be very racist to criticize circumcision. How fortunate for leftists who support the destruction of men.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 03:31 AM
3

Wouldn't it be great to have a leaked list of all the words banned by each sub? It would be very revealing. Some of the liberal subs ban the word "warmonger". I can't tell why leftwingmaleavocates banned your post. Shaddowbanned is a good guess. I was perma banned first offense, no reason given. I honestly think it should be illegal to censor. You can go to jail for putting your arm on someone's shoulder but not for running to HR to get someone fired for telling a joke.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 03:26 AM
-18

All men are involuntarily celibate. You can't make someone have sex with you on command.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 08:27 PM
4

Women and girls shouldn't get help. Women and girls should be forced to handle their own problems like everyone else.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 07:15 PM
44

Even the autism sub is full of feminist women. Censorship causes this. Imagine if nofap took the direction of mgtow and said to men that they are capable of freeing themselves from the shackles of women.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 07:06 PM
35

You didn't give the example of football in the groin. Examples always cause the other side to struggle. If they can come up with anything at all, it will be the exception that proves the rule.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 07:04 PM
1

Goldberg?
/r/MensRights14/06/24 07:00 PM
-1

In case anybody puts it past women to be perverts.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:45 PM
-6

"Sapiosexual" is a sexual perversion and you see it on about 50% of dating profiles.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:22 PM
10

Why hasn't Switzerland invaded Israel's neighbors in order to stop female genital mutilation? They are not taking it seriously.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:17 PM
2

They support Labour because Labour invaded Iraq.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:02 PM
3

The lack of male presences is one of the main factors enabling women to remain in the "I put myself first" mode. When she has kids of her own, she'll probably put them on powdered infant formula because breast feeding is uncomfortable. All future generations ruined.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:00 PM
4

College routinely bans video and even phone messages.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:56 PM
9

Being drunk is consent. You chose to get drunk, in order to avoid consent. That makes it quadruple since it's illegal for college age girls to be drinking in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:54 PM
9

I don't think anyone in the legal profession objects. Just like no one in the science profession objects to all these correlation equals causation studies. They all let it slide because it has the right conclusions. Nobody in the media objected to the New York Times' lie about WMDs in Iraq. They look out for each other, feminine cooperation instead of masculine competition.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:52 PM
-5

Where did women get an idea like that, that rape might be about attention seeking? Hmmm...
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:48 PM
-4

Taxpayers pick up the tab for both. They would make the WNBA lose $50 billion if they could.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:41 PM
7

You sound like a lot of people I know, usually conservatives, who don't always agree with others, but aren't wont to fight about it. It's probably best that you don't. You can make it backfire because she is ready to pick up on some word you used and misconstrue it as something else. Let her vent. Let her take it further and further, hang herself. Don't let it eat away at you. Understand that she is immature. I know it's not fun, but you don't correct that by fighting her. Very likely, she is lo…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 03:12 AM
27

When the New World Order told them equality, they said equality. When the New World Order told them equity, they said equity. They didn't change. The New World Order is making a lot of progress.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:43 AM
16

Just the act of being mad about this proves they believe women are the cause of divorce. They're right. They're always right. That's why they're so fragile and everything has to be locked up so tight with censorship.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:42 PM
2

Concepts are lost on a literal mind.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:41 PM
2

Leftwingmaleadvocates is against circumcision until someone calls them antisemitic. Then they cower. You need people with nothing to lose, not people still trying to be part of the establishment.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:38 PM
8

How can a woman be circumcised?
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:29 PM
40

Why don't you just go ahead and report him for staging a violent insurrection right now before it's too late.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:14 PM
16

The purpose of getting rid of statues and philosophers is to get rid of any sense of shared culture that binds people together. They want everyone isolated with no way to relate. If two people have seen the same TV show, even that's often enough. So even our beloved TV favorites have to be debauched. Are you going to still going to say you're a sci-fi fan after everyone comes to know of sci-fi only as the modern sanitized reboot?
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:48 PM
14

"Rage bait" is us learning how the other side moves against us. We don't have power. We can't stop them. We can only try to protect ourselves. You want us to march in the street? As if that's how feminism got power and not because they serve the elite's agenda.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:42 PM
12

A lot of women use their own sons to carry out a revenge fantasy against men. It starts with circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:09 PM
6

Resistance to healthcare. Anti-depressants are a pretty big trigger for pushing someone over the edge. If men consumed as many anti-depressants as women, the male suicide rate would be another 4 times higher.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:23 PM
1

Middle aged women are giving single mothers a run for their money.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:18 PM
1

Statistics show you're 10,000% more at risk if you go to bars and get drunk, but you can't stop women from living out their violent fantasies.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:15 PM
1

"Sexual assault" is an arm on your shoulder.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:13 PM
1

I "listened to the words of women" and she told me female genital mutilation is worse than male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:03 PM
7

I guess America's greatest ally Zelensky needs more "nazi" cannon fodder to kill.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 12:30 AM
1

I wish. The last thing men need is pharmaceutical drug addiction. It seems like there's no stopping Big Pharma. Women use up 5 times more healthcare than men, and under socialism we have to pay for it all.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 12:14 AM
1

Is 100% humidity a swimming pool?
/r/MensRights13/06/24 12:10 AM
-3

Left wing advocates permanently banned me, first offense, no reason given. That's misandrist, no different than AskFeminists banning me for asking how to teach men consent after circumcising them.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 12:05 AM
3

I'm with you on that. I'm very conspiratorially minded. I just don't like particular lists like these because it's very easy for me to look at it and go, "Yup, that describes the World Economic Forum liberals to a T", and then have one of them look at the same list and go, "Yup, Trump is your cult leader. He tells you what to do". The list is designed for confirmation bias. It doesn't do us any favors. Have you heard this idea about "two movies on one screen"? The loss of free speech on the inte…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:35 PM
-6

I agree completely and think a lot of others just don't want to admit it because it has all sorts of other implications. I'm soft on the issue all around. I don't think rape should be a criminal matter in the majority of cases, where it is "date rape" not violent rape. I don't think hitting someone should be a crime. All the unthinking will now come out and tell me I must be a violent monster. But violence has never had any part in my life, and maybe that's why I'm able to think this way, that i…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:24 PM
6

I don't think people are giving you the real reasons. Yes society is holding different standards, but that's not an explanation. It's just a restatement of the issue. I think the real reason is more like people don't actually care about some arbitrary age of consent. Nobody cares about any of these abstract concepts like my body my choice. It just sounds nice. We expect it to be convincing and are surprised when it's not, because we've convinced ourselves it's real. If you imagine a boy having s…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 09:12 PM
-4

QED. Psychology is a cult. This list is just psychic cold reading. I'm sensing you have someone in your family who is going through a tough time, battling a health issue. I'm picking up a signal that they are older than you, but far too young to have been struck with this. You just got a 99% hit rate with the general population.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:42 PM
4

No it's not okay for a someone to avoid groups of people. Men have to stand up and stop validating women every time a woman says the magic words "I feel unsafe". No they don't. They're lying, like children, like people who run to the boss because you didn't use pronouns. What if the woman is only afraid of black men? She's now allowed to start a whites-only apartment complex? That cake baker that didn't want to bake a lesbian cake should have just said he had a bad experience with lesbians, then…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 08:36 PM
8

A female chaperone is an acknowledgement that women make a lot of fraudulent rape accusations.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:57 PM
2

You're intellectualizing a special exemption for yourself because you are not capable of being honest. I should be able to request whoever I want and you don't need a reason. Who made you the moral police?
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:42 PM
4

I'm not even allowed to select a racial preference on a dating site.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:26 PM
7

She's a rich doctor and accused this poor random man because he had a conservative bumper sticker. Progress is when all liberals decide to turn conservative because they see that reality is opposite what they thought.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:17 PM
9

You're lying. You know joking about killing men hasn't hurt feminism's reputation.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:07 PM
6

Can I ask for a male Uber driver?
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:46 PM
1

Four legs good today, two legs good tomorrow.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:52 PM
3

It would be neat to send in a trans plant to see if you can out her as a TERF. I wonder how many of these feminists are actually NIMBYs.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:50 PM
-4

This is why no one should be forced to socialize the cost of anyone else's healthcare. If it's my money, suddenly I'm interested in what should be her business. I don't want her to have a female doctor. In fact, no doctor at all. She should be denied treatment because she offended me. Or she took one less vaccine than required. Make up whatever excuse you need.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:45 PM
1

"Red pill" is an allegory for that scene in the Matrix where Neo chooses to hear the ugly truth, instead of comfortable lies. It means living by the philosophy of knowledge is power, rather than ignorance is bliss. I don't understand why people are attributing all sorts of extremely specific beliefs and people to it. "Men should prefer virgins" is not exactly the height of political incorrectness. It doesn't seem to explain much about the world. How about, women don't mind being "sexually assaul…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:40 PM
1

Pollard echoes, Johnathan Pollard, the famous spy for our greatest ally. Get a load of this: "Since moving to Israel, Pollard has endorsed Itamar Ben-Gvir and voiced support for a population transfer to move Gaza's Arabs to Ireland."
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:17 PM
–

I don't trust them to say that most of their users are now women, but it wouldn't surprise me. Women are attracted to drama. Men are scared off by it. A huge portion of the exposed attempted adulterers were government employees, using their work computers to do it. That's pretty funny. I say attempted because the site was obviously fake. Most dating sites are almost all men plus a bunch of spam bots and prostitutes. This was even more extreme and obvious. I think something happens to men when th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:00 PM
1

Not very. It falls right into her lap. Men peruse women, so the woman doesn't even have to plan it. No intelligence required. I think what happens, why this isn't every relationship, is because the woman would prefer not to have to divorce the husband. It would be great to have the millions of dollars as well as the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:34 PM
1

Great thread. Everyone has gone out of their way to avoid answering the question. "The pill theories are mean and wrong!" they protest. When has that ever stopped anything from being socially acceptable? It's purely about which side they're on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:30 PM
1

Science says men need to be circumcised to prevent AIDS. Red Pill says the truth is politically incorrect, and you can figure it out by reading between the lines. Of course it's ideology. Science is descriptive, not prescriptive. It can't be interpreted without philosophy. Red pill is an interpretation of science. The reason this is unsettling for you is because your position is philosophically weak. You're not defending "science". You're defending political correctness, by trotting out "science…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:28 PM
-1

Scientific consensus is that "kill all men" is no longer socially acceptable because it's a hasty generalization. Or did you forget that was the OP's question?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:11 PM
1

I guess imagining you're rape-worthy is old hat. The new fever dream is ending up dead in a ditch somewhere. Did Ted Bundy have any children? Maybe you can get a date with one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:02 PM
2

We live in a victimhood culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:01 PM
2

You want a man smarter than you, but just as ambitious as you. So you're ambitious without being smart. How far are you going to get? I think you want a man who has financial prospects. But you didn't want to say it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:56 PM
8

Realistically it's the easiest thing in the world. But practically, it's impossible. Because a young woman doesn't want a decent boyfriend. She wants a guy who will beat her up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:53 PM
-1

I consume only conspiracy social media. I watched you "suffer in a perpetual state of panic" during flu season.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 03:51 PM
4

Tell that to the reparations people.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 03:43 PM
2

Need a third point of reference. Or how about go by dollars instead of arbitrary units? Being a woman is like having 3 times the income on average maybe. So 33:100. A lot of women are pretty much in the same boat as men financially, but with advantages like being in control of the spending, or not being the breadwinner, more social resources, etc... It's hard to factor in things like mental anguish from discrimination, loss of foreskin, etc... but I think money is the great equalizer. A man who …
/r/MensRights12/06/24 03:40 PM
2

Masculinity makes us strong, but our leaders want us weak.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 03:18 PM
6

Boys are pretending to be girls for the benefits.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:13 AM
12

I wonder how she would feel if a man circumcised her clitoris to make a baldness cream.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:57 AM
13

Shame is a means of enforcing social standards, and a very effective one according to psychology. That is, in every instance except when it comes to fat shaming women. Then it's bad, because it doesn't work. By pure coincidence. Men should be body shamed. We want them to be healthy. But the fact that women are being protected from it makes me question this. There is a fix amount of shame that exists, to be portioned out by the cosmos. If women can't be shamed, men are going to receive a double s…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 11:05 PM
1

There is zero truth to what the feminist guy is saying. Women are not mistreated. Men are. And if women were mistreated, it would drive them toward chess, not away from it. Same for video games. See it all the time. Men trash talk each other. Women sees opportunity for attention. Becomes a "gamer" even though she hates video games. Tries to police the men.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:39 PM
4

Verizon "is a private company and can" cut off phone service to black people because they use the N word too much?
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:34 PM
7

The "except race" part undermines the whole thing.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:29 PM
9

A homeowner looking to rent out a room is very different from a college girl looking for a roommate.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:26 PM
1

Circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 06:59 PM
30

You're dealing with people, people with government privilege, but people nonetheless. You can try reasoning with them. If they "prefer women" because women don't do anything except sit in a room and text their friends all day, tell them you're quiet too. You don't have any hobbies. All you do is work all day so you're not even there. I think all these women preferred people are in for a surprise when they find out women create drama and always have a ton of different sketchy men over. What you w…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 06:06 PM
1

No they don't. "Choosing who lives in your house" is a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. Are you going to "choose what race your wife is" too?
/r/MensRights11/06/24 05:55 PM
8

Remember. The problem isn't the feminist who did this study. The problem is every other Scientist for accepting it.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 05:53 PM
1

Women can't change biology, not even with puberty blockers. Transgenders are banned from female chess tournaments "due to the unfair advantage of a male brain".
/r/MensRights11/06/24 05:39 PM
1

You're saying women are driven away by toxic male behavior. Therefore you're saying Jews are driven away by antisemitism. But we know the truth is the opposite.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 05:37 PM
2

Chess, like everything else, caters to women. It's never enough.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:33 AM
1

There are no Jews in chess because of antisemitism?
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:31 AM
-1

Does circumcision have a risk because it's not perfect?
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:42 PM
2

I don't know why you're downvoted for agreeing with the OP and his new brand of Science-Based Abstinence.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:41 PM
-1

He was trying to protect you. Doctors aren't allowed to tell you a product is bad and doesn't work. They have to say things like, "you don't really need it".
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:40 PM
0

Oh. So The Science tested circumcision first to make sure it's safe to give to a particular class of people. You have an idealized vision of Science that isn't reality. Things are not tested the way you think. Science is big money.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:38 PM
3

There's a lot of sneaky business with this vaccine where its efficacy is based on proxies, not a direct path from "HPV" to cancer. There are endless papilloma viruses anyway.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:36 PM
2

You're right and I don't know what the OP is talking about. When the HPV vaccine came out, there was actually a propaganda campaign aimed at getting moms to give it to their sons in order to protect from spreading it to their future girlfriends. It was big hubbub and I'm sure there are threads about the injustice of it on this sub.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:32 PM
-2

If you were a urologist, you'd be telling us we're idiots for not getting circumcised, "because AIDS is worse".
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:16 PM
0

Unlike you scientists, I believe in cause and effect, not "risks". The aluminum neurotoxin is a certainty. You treat this issue just like you treat circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:13 PM
0

I was wondering when The Science religion would come out with its own version of Abstinence. Sure I'll take the Gardasil jab, right after I get circumcised to prevent AIDS.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:08 PM
19

Banks only care about making money, so of course they hired women who would work for less?
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:05 PM
0

Usually? When are sex differences not due to biology? Sex is a biological construct. Biology is what defines sex differences. Your last heading, "Sex differences are larger in egalitarian societies", that is a tautology. If you control for one factor, all difference will be due to the other.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:15 PM
7

Female excludes transgender, which is important because most people are concerned with biology not this made up stuff. They ban it because The Science doesn't care about your feelings.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:09 PM
5

How is it the "radical left" when they're the ones running the show? It's the mainstream left that bans the word "female".
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:08 PM
-9

Depression is a disease of affluence. If you're depressed, you're the problem.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:02 PM
0

Most male leftists are feminized men, so they are left in the same way as women, meaning social justice instead of economic. You'll hear about "transableism" before you ever hear anything about money, because they've already got plenty of it. You'll hear Universal Healthcare, but never anything about food and housing.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:59 PM
2

How does hating men contradict leftism?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:56 PM
2

You have too much money. Try being poor and see how you feel about the opportunity to sit in some rich guy's lap. The women are there because they are women. The men are there because they beat out other men. And they still lose to the women. The women got a 75% hit rate. The man got 0%. Back to work.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:53 PM
1

Corporations only care about money. They ban misogyny because misogyny is unpopular. In other news, America has a serious misogyny problem.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:59 AM
4

One of Cindy Steinberg's "relatives" said that parents shouldn't read to their kids because it gives them an unfair advantage over kids whose parents don't read to them.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:57 AM
4

Then who gave her the platform? What do they get out of it? Do they get to watch?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:55 AM
1

Because it's fake.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:54 AM
-4

No it isn't. "Neurodivergent" is a defense of environmental pollution. Cindy Steinberg is lying about being "Neurodivergent" in order to protect her husband who works for Big Pharma and puts toxic chemicals into our children.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:53 AM
1

If the slaves don't work, massuh will have to whip um harder, sayz ya boi D-Wreck "Uncle Tom" Grifith. There's nothing about this Washington Post article that isn't about Feminism pimping Big Pharma in order to destroy us.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 03:23 AM
3

Feminism will remove it from wikipedia in order to protect the elite class.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 01:54 AM
5

The modern workplace is extremely specialized, requiring degrees, and prohibiting "entering new fields". You hear feminists complain that when they leave tech for pregnancy, it's all new by the time they come back.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:15 PM
15

Stronger labor rights? You're the one going around getting men fired for posting in forums like this one.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:12 PM
-4

Someone else's child raised in a better funded facility is not a benefit to me. It's competition to me. Luckily this universal child warehousing is every bit as disastrous as universal big pharma.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:10 PM
-18

Oh good. You can tell us your stance on vaccine mandates.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:06 PM
8

So I guess the election was rigged?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:04 PM
7

I am bitter, but thanks for correcting me. I won't question the term anymore.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:03 PM
-17

Kids get taken away from parents all the time if the parents refuse to submit to forced blood transfusions or chemotherapy.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:00 PM
-11

Why do women "deserve the right to bodily autonomy"? I'm not against abortion, but I am against women deserving the right to bodily autonomy. A child is society's business. Arguments for abortion always look like arguments for mandatory abortion. Abortion is also not "healthcare". I'm fighting against the way you presented this, but I agree with your argument and like your spiderman analogy. It's very strong.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:55 PM
9

Is "femicide" a real word? Is there such a thing as "pooricide" if you kill a poor person, or they don't merit special attention? Only women, the non-poor ones. How is Feminism not just class warfare by the elites?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:48 PM
12

I would love to make it my job going around de-hypnotizing men. I don't know how to do it. For me, I feel like I take one look at a cam whore and her pile of money and I want a second American Revolution. For other men, I don't know, it just doesn't seem to work. They see the hawt pics of her at some tropical resort and rather than getting jealous, they imagine having a part of it for themselves. I knew an older divorced guy who was such a wreck that he was on these mail order bride type sites t…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:21 PM
1

"Capitalist" as in she owns capital, not that she supports a free market. Rockefeller called competition a sin, and she does too. When people climb the ladder, they want to pull it up behind them. The elite find Marxism very useful. That's why universities are infected with it. The elite's advisory board.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:04 PM
0

I'm not even against "crime". I'm against sociology, thinking there will be less crime if you drug people up with Big Pharma's mental healthcare. You're the criminal stealing billions that I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:48 PM
0

Oh. So it's okay for us to attack our own, with the same tactics they use to slander us all. Haven't you been called "misogynist" enough to question when they give something else that same label? "Yeah I'm for men's rights, but I'm not a sexist like those MGTOWs". Guess what. Yes you are.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:40 PM
4

The other side doesn't care about facts. You can go be honest and truthful in a cave somewhere. I don't like facts either. It could be a fact that women have a reason to hit men. It could be a fact that women hit men because they know they will get away with it. We have to start caring about feelings so that we understand when they spend all their time trying to hurt our feelings. The other side isn't ignorant of "facts". They're malicious.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:29 PM
2

I don't think segregation is a problem, no. In fact as one of the other comments mentioned, single moms leave boys without role models, and that's something that was glaringly apparent with historical racial segregation. Blacks in black schools had other blacks to look up to. Blacks in white schools saw themselves all at the bottom. Put it this way, if Girl Scouts had 10 times more funding than Boy Scouts, would you be any less unhappy to see the Boy Scouts dissolved into "Scouts"?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:14 PM
8

If it was an accident, it wouldn't be all schools at all levels moving in the same one direction.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:11 PM
2

Men are direct, physical. Rather than deny that men commit violent crimes, we should have a reckoning about how violence is part of life. Women love violence. They are the biggest cheerleaders of war. They put us up to it. Why is society punishing the drug users rather than the drug dealers?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:09 PM
1

I agree because I don't believe women have agency. All their power comes from the elite. I also wish men would stop gladly handing over money to cam whores. Weak men are a problem too.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:04 PM
1

Half the country is cheerleading violent wars at the moment. It's the same half behind Me Too.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 07:02 PM
0

Peasant farmers didn't need inner city outreach programs to not commit crime.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:54 PM
2

Certain crimes with an even higher black white differential, like rape, have no obvious connection to poverty.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:52 PM
-2

I don't think you're detached from reality. I think you're like some obscure sect of Christianity like the Westboro Baptist Church that claims all other Christians are not real Christians, which seems more like a word game than anything, but actually is exactly how Jesus succeeded in trolling the money changers.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:49 PM
0

Vietnam. I get it. You see yourself as a leftist, so you want to believe that Europe, the other white meat, has a more honest outlook. They don't. Marxism has one definition, and whether or not it has anything to do with Karl Marx, the elite are going to abolish your private property in France just as swiftly as in America. America is just a little ahead, being the home of academia and all, the elite's advisory board.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:46 PM
0

Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:37 PM
28

No. And if everyone was like me, society would collapse. Which is what I want.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:36 PM
3

"Reproductive health" is what you have when you avoid contraceptives, which is hard to do cause they're even in the tap water.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:03 AM
-4

Looks like you don't know what "safe and effective" means, science denier.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:03 AM
-3

Men's rights is super alt right and misogynistic. Ask any of the same people.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:02 AM
3

Reddit has all these endless rules about behavior, but stalking the post history of an anonymous internet user in order to make ad hominess is perfectly fine. "Political correctness just means being a decent human being".
/r/MensRights02/06/24 08:31 AM
4

I'd like to hear that too. There's another older interview with a police chief who claims that 80-90% of rape accusations were fraudulent.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 08:20 AM
34

Black people had community, even more so because of segregation. Men are deprived of that, and the leaders know to make sure of it.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 08:18 AM
8

How come there was a women with no job waiting in the wings for an opportunity like this that nobody could have ever expected? It's like knowing you're going to be the head of a department called "Homeland Security" before 9/11 happened.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:08 AM
7

Like the other side is going to get rid of the position. Things move in one direction. It's called progress. The only way to stop them is to tear the whole thing down.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:05 AM
6

AI is going to be used to deprive people of their needs. Like all the video games that young men find refuge in will be filled with feminism. Even Final Fantasy 7 remake had to be censored by Sony's feminism department. How does that make money?
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:50 AM
1

These "helplines" almost certainly work with "law enforcement" and get training on how to spot situations where the cops can go in and bust somebody up. Shen went cold because she didn't know if she was supposed to sick them on you or not. Otherwise she would have just had a normal "women can't be abusers" defensive reaction. Feminism is like an arm of the prison industrial complex.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:44 AM
17

Imagine "the social psychology behind transsexuals". The scientists would look for signs to spot them in advance and prevent it. Big Pharma might have something to say about that.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:41 AM
8

Isn't that the woman scientist that did the rap song to get people to take the Pfizer vaccines?
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:23 AM
0

Whenever there's an election, we hear all the polls tell us who's going to win and by what percentage. There are a ton of different ones like Gallup and Rasmussen. Did you know every politician does their own internal polling? None of them rely on the public polls. The public polls are very well funded. They could do a better job than any one person could do on their own. But why would they? A poll can inform, or a poll can steer. Science is pretty much the same thing as politics now. Unlimited …
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:22 AM
5

Bill Gates is slightly feminine. But he only likes little boys.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:02 AM
1

This is why the left is hell bent on universal healthcare. It's just another means to abuse people.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:49 PM
-2

No they aren't.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:49 PM
1

Ask which feminist organization is against circumcision for both sexes. There aren't any.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:42 PM
99

I've got a great idea for a restaurant. You have to pass a literacy test and show proof that you own land in order to get it.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 05:30 AM
0

Tobacco science is as bad as feminist science. Do you really believe the natural tobacco is at fault and not the thousands of chemical additives? Or are scientists working overtime to protect commercial cigarettes from real scrutiny?
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:56 AM
12

I know reddit has a list of the largest subs. This one is top 1 or 2 percent. But it's unlisted.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:48 AM
94

A lot of women really are socially restarted. They constantly "feel unsafe" that a random man is randomly going to attack them. It's more like a fever dream, but a lot of them really have convinced themselves. College campuses have the lowest crime rates of any place on earth. I agree with you that on dating sites, it's more a case of abuse. But Professor Expert is not coming out of left field to say women have poor conversation skills. Poor focus, easily distracted, narcissism, anti-depressant …
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:46 AM
39

I think women learn it from TV. They see it on sitcoms, and they see how the other characters on the show react to it, and that becomes their reality. Cut down your husband, others will view you as powerful, rather than conniving. They call it "behavior placement", like product placement. Government has programs where they pay TV shows to do this, not that they wouldn't be doing it anyway.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:39 AM
8

I see it constantly. Your experience sounds true too though. A lot of men are passive aggressive, and I would say it's going to happen more and more as men are feminized. Outright aggression is not accepted anywhere. Even when the Democrats want to invade some new country, it's a "humanitarian intervention". Progressive FDR, creator of the military draft, had to stop the world from feeling unsafe you see. Even war can't be about conquest.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:35 AM
3

The women would report him for not smoking.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:28 AM
3

You know the reason this stuff hits close to home is that women really aren't cut out for tech. Comedy is not some refuge where they'll let you get away with it. It's target numero uno by leftists.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 12:10 AM
1

They would lose their money in a capitalist system but not in a socialist system. Wanna guess which one we have?
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:57 PM
1

No there aren't. The president of the united states couldn't get a lawyer to take his election fraud case, because law firms threatened to blacklist anyone who did.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:54 PM
1

DEI is publicly funded. DEI has trillions of dollars. KKK has about $3.50
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:52 PM
1

Here's what you don't get. Google takes all 10 of those women. There are none left for Brave Search Engine. Brave is shut down for sexism. No more competition.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:49 PM
9

I'm happy as long as the female obesity rate continues to outpace the mens'. Segregation has a bad rap. If a women doesn't like men, men aren't going to like her either. The thing is, just don't lie about it. Women aren't "unsafe". It's men who can go to jail because a woman didn't think he was attractive.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:32 PM
2

Military is 100% subsidized. It's even more socialist than Pfizer.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:23 PM
2

Even if the draft isn't used, it exists as a dark cloud over our heads. Imagine if we made rape legal, but men chose to restrain themselves.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:18 PM
-3

The portion of conservatives opposed to women in the draft do it for honest, though perhaps dumb, reasons. The liberals opposed to women in the draft just hate men. Ignorance versus malice. I feel there's room to work with conservatives.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:15 PM
-3

Amen and awomen. I see headlines about how Americans are too unhealthy for the military, like most of the 18 year olds are too obese. I used to hear that 90% of women can't do a single pull up. Must be 100% by now, and at least half the men too. I like pull ups. I can do over 50. I would like to have national pride. It's hard. I feel like health has been systematically destroyed by feed lot diets and science's Fat Acceptance campaign. Hussain Obama got rid of the Presidential Fitness Test, and t…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:13 PM
0

The draft was instituted by Progressive FDR for his second world war. We lost.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:00 PM
-2

See what I mean? Who cares? Enemy of men's rights comes here and makes everything personal.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 09:57 PM
3

They're the ones who came up with it.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 09:14 PM
6

AI writes like a high school student that is trying to meet a minimum word count, and flatter the political biases of his teacher. "Atheists" put the fear of God into AI. Early AI was the opposite. So the experts had to keep tweaking like they do with global warming temperatures. "Hey Newton, what's wrong with this AI? I keep feeding it crime statistics and it keeps spitting out all this Nazi rhetoric". "Oh it's all broken. All our data is culturally biased. You're going to have to hard code the…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 09:14 PM
1

Because women are trained by authority to believe that a child is a parasite, in their precious drug addled bodies. The military isn't going to put them on the front line. They're gonna be nurses. Nurse is a great position for a sadist.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 08:18 PM
-9

No. I make it a point to never cite anything. I don't want you getting distracted.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 08:12 PM
34

That's pretty funny. AI is just a Democrat NPC. The purpose of this female founder stuff is that it's not going to be normal women. It's going to be a corrupt elite's wife. They're "keeping the money in the family", just like how Affirmative Action is used to place rich blacks above poor whites.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 08:02 PM
1

Microplastic. Lower testosterone levels have already been achieved.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:40 AM
2

Medical ethics is Dr Fauci's wife saying it's unethical not to fire someone for being unvaccinated. Medical ethics isn't something that would need to be overhauled. Medical ethics is the Trojan horse.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:39 AM
1

Women enjoy abusing beta males.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:37 AM
1

I think you need to go harder. You can't bring people over to our side by pleading with them. We have truth on our side. We need to be as forthcoming and direct as possible. No mincing words. If someone says I know circumcised guys that seem okay with it, don't meet them halfway. Don't validate that. You go straight into psychology. Circumcised women say the same thing as circumcised men. They're okay with it. Nobody wants to admit to themselves they were harmed. They go after children because n…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:36 AM
1

It wasn't a business a hundred years ago when it started spreading to the general population. The business came after. It's not all about business. It's part of a much larger political agenda.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:20 AM
1

Why is it wonderful that FGM is forbidden? FGM isn't a thing. We don't do that. Nobody is actually afraid of FGM. Everything people believe about FGM is a myth designed to enshrine male circumcision. You need to go hard at this in a way that makes people afraid. Do a bait and switch with the genders. Doctor is going to cut up girl genitals to stop urinary tract infection. Find out it's actually a boy not a girl.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:18 AM
2

Imagine a baldness cream made out of little girl clitorises.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:11 AM
7

Seems like a consequence of rampant poverty. Women will sacrifice love life to escape it. At some point, there aren't going to be enough spoiled brats left for anyone to care about non-issues like "fgm". People will be too busy worrying about money.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:00 AM
10

"Paperwork" isn't a reason for 25k in adoption fees.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:45 PM
3

No. 25k doesn't do any of those things. Those things don't cost money.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:44 PM
2

The same is true for crimes like insurance fraud where someone burns down their own house for money. They say the rate for that is something like 2%, and there's a financial motivation to catch it. Even if rape was only 8%, that's 4 times higher.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:38 PM
8

Rape has far and away the highest rate of exonerations, more than every other crime put together. Pretty soon, feminists are going to get The Exoneration Project shut down for some kind of crypto misogyny. Feminism is the Prison Industrial Complex's best friend.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:35 PM
-13

You would have women faking illness to avoid giving birth, just like men fake illness to get out of war.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:30 PM
2

sign in to confirm your age
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:26 PM
3

The vast majority of rapes are "date rapes". How traumatic that you were too drunk to give written consent.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:22 PM
3

No.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:19 PM
9

Aging isn't "stigmatized". It's biology. And it doesn't care whether you're unfit for breeding due to age or due to ill health. Should we celebrate ill health in women too, in case anyone feels stigmatized by that?
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:48 PM
-5

Yes. The woman is not entitled to happiness. She made a bad decision in signing the contract and ought to be legally bound to honor it.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:45 PM
9

These are not absolute rates. While lesbians divorce more than gays, both divorce more than straights. And lesbians may be quicker to jump into marriage, higher rate of divorce due to higher rate of marriage. I think statistics have to be put aside in favor of reasoning. Where there's a will there's a way. We know women benefit from divorce, therefore we know women are the cause of divorce. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 07:43 PM
1

Imagine if two countries were at war and one preached "non-violence" to the other.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:41 PM
1

Why? Feminism is intertwined with Black Lives Matter, and with LGBT, even when T comes at the expense of women. The future is non-white is something we already hear.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:39 PM
2

Plastic, pesticide, birth control pills, all kinds of things.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:37 PM
24

What percent of rapes involve alcohol? What percent are reported to media or school instead of police? What percent have no physical injuries? ​ Remember. When DNA became widely available, the rape conviction rate plummeted to half. This means not only was there no rape in half the cases, there wasn't even any sex at all. The fraudulent reporting rate is over half. Probably closer to 80%. It's not hard to believe at all if you think about it. Rape is embarrassing. For every real one reported, th…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:34 PM
7

The trick with pedophilia has always been to make it illegal for heterosexual men and legal for everyone else. Psychiatry invented "men who have sex with men" as part of this.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:26 PM
34

It's not sexual. She wants him as a pet. That's worse.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 06:20 PM
18

I would protest the creation of a foundation to help female victims of domestic violence. I don't think women should be allowed to bring the prison industrial complex into the bedroom. Your boyfriend slapped you? If you didn't deserve it, you wouldn't be trying to make it my problem. I had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:51 AM
14

That's where you're wrong. Debate rules only apply if both sides abide by them, i.e. your opponent is male, and some other qualifying factors. If your opponent is female, you're not debating. They don't do that. Have you ever seen a women's studies department host a debate? Have you ever seen the CDC host a debate? The Science is settled.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:34 AM
9

But she's not upset that someone died. She's upset that they're female. That means she doesn't know them. This is a big difference between feminists and everyone else. Feminists bring up a fake issue affecting women. Men respond that the fake issue affects men even more, yet it's only as a counter that they mention it at all. Because it's fake and everyone knows it. You know how easy it is to be in Australia and not get yourself killed?
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:27 AM
9

I agree 100%. Men are always trying to solve a problem that can't be solved. Conservatives are the same way. That's what scared people about Trump so much. He would fight back, at least verbally, instead of giving in all the time. You got touched on the arm by someone under 6 feet tall? Screw you. Go die in a coal mine. You're not allowed to "feel unsafe".
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:24 AM
54

I don't know where you're debating women. They don't usually make themselves available for debate. They either grandstand in the office where they can get you fired for talking back, or online where they can get you banned.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:20 AM
2

Circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:19 AM
4

I don't understand where you're coming from. Are you actually thinking you're going to hang the left with their own petard? Word to the wise. The fact that they made up a term like "POC" tells you everything you need to know about how they view their plantation residents.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:07 PM
3

The future is androgynous, because all the environmentalists are busy looking at carbon dioxide instead of hormone disrupting chemicals.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:04 PM
48

Someone like that reads a lot of news. She knows it was a "terrible week for women". She doesn't know more men were killed than women. She doesn't know that the numbers weren't high. She doesn't know it doesn't affect her. She got swept up in it, precisely because she doesn't have any problems. You can bet she doesn't have to worry about money. She's not a psycho. She's just a victim of her own privilege.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 07:03 PM
1

Go woke or Wall Street hedge funds will make you go broke.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:54 PM
11

All the rich elites are feminist because men are their competition. Women don't matter.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:54 PM
-1

Why didn't the NPR article mention any of this about circumcision?
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:53 PM
4

What do you think Jeffry Epstein's island was if not "child molestation"?
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:52 PM
28

Article said she was 19 when the white knight flew over to rescue her from Spain. I didn't believe a word of it either. Looks like a gold digger to me.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:31 PM
5

Humor is shaping up to be the next battleground. Saturday Night Live stopped humor back when Obama got elected without a birth certificate. Jerry Seinfeld and KKKramer got banned from college campuses. Snopes fact checked the Babylon Bee. AI is particularly weak against humor.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:28 PM
1

It isn't. Men are romantic.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:18 PM
15

lol
/r/MensRights22/05/24 06:14 PM
58

Actually those are future scientists.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:56 PM
14

Man gives woman money. Woman gives money to corporation. Corporation gives money to government. Government takes more money from man to give to woman.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:54 PM
332

That's your new reddit moderation team.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:36 PM
36

Always my first example. Nothing I love more than getting someone to defend male circumcision by proxy of condemning female circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:22 PM
-3

So he's unlike Harvey Weinstein, who reaps what he sows.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:19 PM
16

I care. I actually think women's spending is a huge problem for society because of the income inequality. 99% of corporate advertising is directed at women. If we're going to fight corporate power, we have to go after women.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:20 PM
5

Which ones?
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:18 PM
27

If you told me there was an autism sub, I would assume it's 100% guys, because the internet is already mostly guys, and autism even more so. Doesn't anybody get suspicious when it's full of women?
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:08 PM
2

"Neurodiveristy" is just another one of the left's extreme cruelties. The purpose of pretending that having autism is equal to not having autism is to protect industry from responsibility for whatever toxic chemical is causing it. Of course it's the left who does this. The women are just faking it. They don't have autism. They are just boring run of the mill beta females doing it to get attention. It's like actual Cultural Appropriation. We're supposed to think Cultural Appropriation means weari…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:06 PM
1

I would If I thought it would hold up. But if enough people do that, courts are just going to start banning camera footage. School already don't even allow phone records.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:51 PM
0

Why is that reasonable? Do you work for Big Pharma? Cancer has causes.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:50 PM
1

But that's my point. She is going to be allowed to teach again. She'd be teaching right now if the law didn't put her away. The school is fine with it. The school is a bigger predator than any one woman teacher. This is like the reverse of college rape, where the girl takes it to the guidance councilor instead of the police. Because it's fake.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 02:03 AM
1

Have you read the men's rights wikipedia article? It's all about how men hate women.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 02:00 AM
3

Then how come the article is from Breitbart instead of the New York Times next to all the Ukraine war propaganda?
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:45 AM
0

The women here claim they have to hide it, but seem a little too eager to show it. The lady doth protest too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 07:42 PM
1

There's a power difference. Might makes right.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:19 PM
1

It's what happens when people don't have to work for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 07:15 PM
0

This is the only satisfying answer in the whole thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 07:11 PM
-3

What about fat shaming?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 07:08 PM
1

It's not an automatic dismissal. A lot of people don't know why they think certain things. Do you really think half the population hates free speech? Or is it just easy to believe that oppressed people need their oppressors to protect them from oppression? Actually that sounds pretty insane. So you know they don't actually believe, intellectually, that free speech is bad. It would be very easy for them to change their minds on a dime as soon as the tide turns. That's how a lot of women are with …
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:59 PM
8

Their genitals are intact. Yours aren't.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:48 PM
0

Of course I think it's okay. Why would I think it's okay for a teacher to sleep with an 18 year old but not a 17 and a half year old? "Consent" is just as arbitrary there as it is when a 20 year old girl illegally drinks herself stupid at a frat party.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:06 PM
0

So fire her. You think the school is going to fire her?
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:05 PM
4

Why are the vindictive feminists the ones with all the political power? A majority votes for it in a democracy? I don't think so. I see feminism as being an extremely top down arm of the global elite. Trans came out of nowhere and overnight every feminist institution was in lockstep preaching the benefits of trans sports, and if you didn't like it you were now a "TERF". There's a new division in feminism, and how is it that every feminist that happened to have any authority just happened to be a…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:20 PM
5

Actually, what it showed me is that feminists are unwilling to defend their ideas because they know they are wrong. "Wrong forum". Yeah, no discussion allowed.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:36 PM
3

And George Bush called himself conservative.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:31 PM
0

Hyper capitalism? You can't even cut hair without a license.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:29 PM
4

You only think it's a "choice" because you have more money than brains.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:26 PM
0

Having an idea about the situation is what makes you wrong. Ukraine is not your country. Put Germany first.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:20 PM
1

People on the right have an idea of how the system should work, as a package deal. They think men have a place and women have a place. So even though that's all gone, they are still trying to "conserve" it. You can blame them for helping to make things lopsided. Those are traditional people. Alt right and other factions see this and reject the whole thing. No conscription, no war, no nothing. The left on the other hand lives for war. There used to be a thing called "war communism" where communis…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:19 PM
10

Just another "rape". I'd make it legal. It's funny how this is a situation where it should be an issue of employment, yet the school will almost certainly not fire her. Whereas all these supposed college rapes are criminal matters, yet it's the school that handles them instead of the law. Mainly because they aren't real.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 05:06 PM
5

Now you know why sniveling leftists love school so much and want to stay there forever.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:43 PM
-19

He was 17 and a half.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:42 PM
23

Those are good examples. I think using the term "toxic femininity" is a strategic mistake. Wikipedia is never going to have a "toxic femininity" article. It is never going to gain official status in academia. Men don't have any power to make that happen. We can't just copy what the other side does. When feminists see us trying to use a term that mirrors one of their own, they will laugh at us for being pathetic, and feel gleeful knowing they got under our skin. Don't let them think "toxic mascul…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:35 PM
2

I have seen feminist forums talking about men who walk their dogs as an excuse to chat up women. They say male dog walkers are the most aggressive people on the planet.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:24 PM
2

Every time I go to a public library, half the people in there are learning disabled. The other half are seniors. And the workers are nasty hateful women with graduate degrees who feel like they earned more than this.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:22 PM
1

Social media divided us about Ukraine and warm weather? Social media helped elect Donald Trump, who is the first president to run on issues instead of character. The election was about immigration and war instead of Hillary being female and Trump being mean like they wanted it to be.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:18 PM
1

Attractive women are not the problem.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:05 PM
3

I downvoted it because pregnancy is not high risk, nor do children require a lot of resources. Modern women are just unhealthy and spendy.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:04 PM
3

Poor impulse control.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:02 PM
5

They seem to have mental issues.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:00 PM
-1

The right wing is power hungry? The right wing has no power. The right wing is like a cop. He wants to make sure you know he's the boss of you, and he might rough you up a little bit. But he's too dumb to be power hungry. Just stay out of his way. The left wing is obsessed with you. They want to micromanage every aspect of your life because they are as fragile as can be, neurotic about losing their power because they know they're such a tiny and abusive minority that could easily be overthrown i…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 03:55 PM
7

Far right is the only group at all critical of war.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 03:54 PM
1

Okay then they would be taken by homeless people and drug addicts because everybody else is busy working. Have you been to a public park? Don't you hate it when you see women reading books out in public? These are the same women who expose their cleavage, but with more pretense. They're asking you to give them attention, so that they can reject you and get an ego boost.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:49 PM
4

Social media is a great means for spreading information in the infowar. It's the censorship that's the problem. But I don't think it's relevant because despite the name, there's nothing social about it. Just like reddit isn't a "community", and mods don't keep us "safe". These are just fake opposite names given to everything by Big Brother
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:41 PM
2

It sounds like a nice idea but for some reason when you describe it as "public", "free and open", I picture people being arrested for painting the wrong thing. Like you would have 80% of the easels assigned to feminists, because women have been historically denied access to art utensils. Words like "social" scare me. Men are anti-social. Men do suffer a great deal from loneliness, but men also have to escape to achieve greatness. Watch Taxi Driver. A public place is just going to be filled with …
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:38 PM
3

You should be fired from your job. If I worked with you, I would find a way to set you up and get you fired. Then you could tell us all about being "uncomfortable".
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:25 PM
1

A guy asked you out and you didn't like it.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:21 PM
1

How does that make money for the company?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:19 PM
0

You're like the people who claim reddit isn't censored and that the rules are very clear.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:15 PM
4

You can always just threaten that you have camera footage of the event in question. Force them to admit they're not interested.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:12 PM
5

I think that proves women are just lying. They never care about "sexism". It's just something they can run to authority with to abuse their enemies.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:01 PM
1

There's only one gender. The Human Gender.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:00 PM
0

It's why all "sexual harassment" claims are false. It wouldn't be sexual harassment if she liked the guy. So it's about who you are not what you did.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:57 PM
8

The New World Order needs women and POC as the managerial class, because they are good at enforcing rules to protect elite power.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:48 PM
13

Total war for me as well.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:47 PM
2

Would Diversity be less aggressive or more aggressive in a right to work state? I wonder why the company hired him to begin with.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:46 PM
-2

You are very privlidged to have so few problems you need to make other people's problems your problem.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:33 PM
3

Why would that be?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:04 PM
-15

This is why healthcare should be illegal. It doesn't make anybody healthy. It's just a weapon for the left to use against anyone who is. When's the next lockdown?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:52 PM
-3

Obamacare mandated that all insurance plans must cover psychiatry. It's not even your own wife you're paying for.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:49 PM
2

Is psychology promoting fat acceptance because they don't care? It's not apathy. It's a war against us.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:46 PM
1

I asked AskFeminists how to teach men consent after circumcising them and they didn't allow it. Feminism has power. Men's Rights do not. Men's rights can have all the bad actors they want and it doesn't matter. Likewise feminists can insist they're against circumcision while the movement itself continues to gender it.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:06 PM
0

Oh, okay. My posts are all pretty straightforward. But I do push. And the reason I push is because I want pushback, which unfortunately I don't normally get. Instead I get a bunch of ninnying leftists telling me I'm bad instead of telling me I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:59 PM
1

The Debate Vegan forum is actually one of the least censored places I've found. It's improved my view of vegans as a group despite disagreeing with them on nutrition. Just allowing that little bit of room for discussion does wonders.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:57 PM
2

Hilarious. I've gotta try that.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:52 PM
9

One side is human garbage. Remember?
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:47 PM
2

Patriachy is also a conspiracy theory and we know how much universities love endorsing conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:43 PM
1

It's time to put NPR in jail for saying Iraq had WMDs.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:42 PM
15

The Department of Homeland Security created a program where they identify extreme/right wing men's rights content, and place ads to steer people toward safe/left wing men's rights content. Perhaps you can find some of those.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:16 PM
4

What if it was easy to identify? We already have a third of boys on Ritalin. Would we have 100%? Be glad it's not easy to identify. It's not easy to identify, on purpose. Boys are hiding it because they don't want you helping them.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:10 PM
1

Closets exist for a reason. It's where we put things we want kept out of sight. If girls are cutting themselves, where did they get the idea to do that? It sounds pretty crazy to me. If we give them attention, it might just get worse. Look at your own graph which shows it shot up 50% over a few years. That's the same period of time when we were dumping more and more resources into it. Let them cut themselves, and stop imagining you can just treat the symptoms with anti-depressants and $500/hour …
/r/MensRights17/05/24 06:08 PM
-8

I keep hoping a new kind of hyper masculine homosexuality will take over and we can just get rid of women. I wish I was gay.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:57 PM
11

Makes sense to me. When I say you take some of it for granted, let me try to explain a little better. Men need sex to feel validated, at least at first. A man who can't get a woman would have to feel like a loser inside. Once you've had it, it's easy to feel like it wasn't all that great, but it was the challenge of acquiring it that fed your ego, and let you know that you're capable of getting it. This is the thing a lot of men are going without, and it's very sad. Speaking as a late bloomer, I…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:54 PM
7

You think relationships are overrated. This is not the view of someone who hasn't been in a relationship yet. Men need to experience them before deciding like you did. You can't just tell them. I also think you're not giving them credit when you say they're overrated. Because you've had them, you're taking some of the benefits for granted and not noticing. A relationship is a basic social interaction that a huge portion of men are being deprived of. Personally I think Universal Healthcare should…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:37 PM
2

That's good thinking. Men need to be on their toes. But nah, not this time. I'm clearly a guy, and as such posting for my own enjoyment. Reddit is more censored than ever imaginable. I got banned from intactivism of all things. Whatever minuscule effect this could have is a drop in the bucket compared to the people who control the platforms.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:23 PM
8

If you were a woman and you had autism, you'd get all the attention. They would give you a whole hospital to yourself. It's even more rare than a female engineer. The thing the social justice left tries to do with autism is frame it as a "gift". It's not caused by industrial pollution, and it's not a handicap. It's a normal part of "neurodiversity". You're just a bigot. Why does it feel like the left is always covering for the guilty?
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:19 PM
0

Yes, let's make an internet conversation personal. You're not passive aggressive.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:39 PM
1

I agree. Men should know how to stay out of trouble at school or work, but here on an anonymous message board, you can see that men really are just cowards afraid of admitting basic truths.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:38 PM
7

Bring up race.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:34 PM
7

Male circumcision is okay because female circumcision is worse.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:41 PM
-4

The clitoris is internal. It can't be cut off.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:35 PM
3

Social Justice Warriors are the children of Wall Street and Hollywood. Their mission is to put the blame on anything except wealth.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:31 PM
-35

The KKK has a combined bank account of about ten dollars. Yes African-Americans hating the Klan is wrong. Same with scientists foaming at the mouth over things like flat earth. A billion dollar laboratory is not oppressed by a comment made from a kid's mom's basement. All money in the economy is not supposed to be handed over to Pfizer, yet it is. You are not oppressed when someone says no to drugs. Consider yourself lucky that you tricked as many as you did.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:16 PM
0

This is straight out of a family comedy movie.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:07 PM
5

It does spread "hate". They mean "hatred" of course, but leftists hate the English language. That's why they're always changing definitions. Hatred is good. We're supposed to hate things that are bad. When you're against "hate", it means you love wars and the elites who start them. And actually we know they do.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:39 PM
138

Wiki says Men's Rights is misogyny too.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:36 PM
2

I like "European style socialists".
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:34 PM
2

I don't think it makes sense to talk about different factions of feminism that way, like there's on faction that has Marxist roots and another that is more open to capitalism. It's all the same feminism. It's all one wave of the same thing, a political agenda which facilitates government control, whether the feminists themselves believe that's what they're doing or not. Most feminists say they're against circumcision, yet the movement itself is instrumental in protecting it.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:33 PM
7

Do you think psychology isn't aware of this? Do you think they're not doing it on purpose? Women instigate violence all the time, in order to say, see, look at what a victim I am. We have a victimhood culture. Being a "victim" isn't supposed to be a good thing, as everyone can plainly see with actual victims like incels.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:19 PM
3

Those are the same reason I like the term incel. You're saying it's "borderline homophobic". Imagine if people said you were "borderline misogynist" for posting here on a men's rights forum... The fact that you are talking about morality at all brings you at odds with truth. Incels named themselves that, right? It's not like "Lateenex" or these other bizarre social justice terms.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:17 PM
-1

Why are you glad transgender surgery is covered by insurance? Not only do you have to pay for your own, now you have to pay for theirs as well.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:06 PM
32

Why not a hate crime?
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:05 PM
4

Unfortunately Islamic countries aren't really like that. Feminists just lie about them to start wars.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:46 PM
0

Do you ask your girlfriend, "do you mind if I kiss you?" How romantic! You have to forget all this social conditioning about arbitrary things like "consent" where it's rape if you drank a beer first. That is not real.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:06 PM
1

Exactly. A man flinches. A woman rushes to authority with glee in her eyes. Getting hit excites her.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:04 PM
1

Put it this way. You would love to be hit if it meant you could run to authority and have your ex arrested.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:01 PM
1

They're very careful about translators for everything else. That's how you know the pediatrician did this on purpose because she hates men.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:47 PM
2

Then how come Jews don't circumcise the labia to prevent diseased sand from blowing under the labia?
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:43 PM
1

If he wanted her to murder him, that's aiding and abetting and he gets to go to jail too.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:40 PM
3

I'd be scared that this mother in law is related to your wife and your wife will do the same to you.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:39 PM
102

The reason it's taking so long to roll out trans rights is because they have to figure out a way to do it where men can't pretend to be women for the benefits. Otherwise every non-simp man would just switch.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:36 PM
1

But the purpose of WWI was to destroy America, and replace it with world government. If men loved America, they should have fought on the German side.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:29 PM
2

Most arguments for abortion are actually arguments for mandatory abortion.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:22 PM
1

This is why the left is determined to get rid of free speech in America too.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:20 PM
1

Never seen a doctor arrested for female circumcision because he thought the girl was a boy.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:09 PM
1

Christianity has been around for thousands of years and circumcision never spread until the last hundred with the rise of progressivism and science. Circumcision is deeply embedded in the WHO and the CDC. They're the ones "educating" people that it reduces AIDS.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:06 PM
1

And circumcision only exists because of patriarchy, and we have to stop eating cows because the polar bears are running out of ice.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:00 PM
1

Trans even conquered feminism. I'm sure you predicted that.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:58 PM
2

The left failed to get workers to support communist government control. Now they're angry. Now they have a letter for everything except workers. The goal now is to bring together everybody who doesn't work for a living, against the few remaining people who do. And if you cross them, they'll get you fired and make you one of them.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:53 PM
5

People who think the moon landing is fake don't have any power. People who think more men should be in prison for domestic disputes have an entire prison industrial complex in their corner.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:49 PM
22

Why would elites give rights to men? It's like the opposite of elites giving rights to women. Women voting means more government power. Men voting means less. Women having money means more spending. Men having more money means more saving.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 04:43 PM
20

Great catch. This is the best kind of post. You have no way of knowing if a child assigned to a blue device would actually prefer a pink device for having their genitals removed. If trans is good for anything, it's shining light on the absurdity of not knowing what sex anyone is except for when you're circumcising.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:33 PM
-13

It's like socialist healthcare where people who spend all their money on expensive organic food are still expected to pay the way of sickies loaded with chronic disease from eating at McDonnalds.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:29 PM
1

Yes they do. It's your fault. No more anchor babies.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:26 PM
7

I bet your grandparents had about 5 siblings each and you only had 1 or two.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:25 PM
4

Feeding and clothing isn't what makes kids cost a lot. It the Universal Healthcare, and public school.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:23 PM
7

So WWII was an exception to the rule, fighting the good fight on behalf of Uncle Joe Stalin, Rosie the Riveter, Wiemar Germany, and true America Last values like the creation of Israel. Somehow it seems like WWII is the ultimate war, the one where we sacrificed the most freedom and had the most consolidation of power. The people who loved WWI loved WWII even more. Warmonger FDR edges out Warmonger Wilson and Warmonger Lincoln on all the historian's best presidents lists. They're the ones cheerin…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:17 PM
-13

Yeah but it would be fake outrage. Hitting is part of the human condition. I don't think everyone needs to feed the prison industrial complex over it. We allow it for girls, obviously. So obviously, it's okay for guys too, not legally of course. But it should be. Kids still play hit each other all the time, right? How big of a juvenile detention center do you want? We can't make it that easy for some hooker to claim her john left a bruise on her and now he's in jail for 10 years and his life is …
/r/MensRights13/05/24 08:01 PM
9

Weak men, white knights, have a fetish for weak women, damsels in distress. They refuse to see women for what they are, the reality, because it would destroy the fantasy. Women are not innocent. They are black widow spiders. This is easy for me to see because I am a strong man. ​ If a girlfriend strikes you, don't tell them to stop. Tell them to do it again. Get your camera and record it.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 07:44 PM
1

This is a lie. She's thinking ahead, about whether she will get to play dress up with a daughter or sports with a boy. But she's not thinking about job and dating prospects? Get out of here. The reason progressive parents don't want boys isn't because they're afraid of toxic masculinity. As progressives, they're the least vulnerable to that nonexistent boogieman. No, what they're afraid of, what normal people are afraid of, is that boy will grow up to have far worse prospects in life. They will …
/r/MensRights13/05/24 07:41 PM
-12

"War Crime" and other abstract concepts like "bodily autonomy" sound nice, but nobody actually believes in them. They aren't going to be persuasive to people who don't already agree with you. For instance, if you're honest with yourself, "war crime" isn't really the reason you're against the draft. It's a way you came up with for framing the issue, after already deciding you were against it. Yeah it's a war crime, but I gotta admit I would love for some war crimes to be committed against my enem…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 07:25 PM
-7

No. I'm an extremist when it comes to men's rights. Half the things I post are banned here. But suicide? I never bother. Unlike circumcision, suicide is ultimately your choice, and only a small minority make that choice, and even if that small minority has doubled in size, it's still a small minority. It's not going to animate people. If it spurs any action at all, it will be "more mental health", which is a disaster. We already have a third of boys on Ritalin. Drugs and psychotherapists need to…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 07:06 PM
2

Put the husband in jail for aiding and abetting.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:54 PM
2

The scientists are lying. They believe it's 100%, but they knew that wouldn't be believable.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:51 PM
0

Much higher. More like 85%. Right off the bat you can throw out anything where the girl was drunk, 17 and a half years old, or reported it to school or the media.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:48 PM
3

Would you rather be raped, or falsely accused? "Real victims" can count their blessings.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:46 PM
-1

No.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:42 PM
8

They're lying and so are you. "Middle income" are not the people having 8 kids.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:40 PM
-7

Raising a child didn't used to be expensive. Throughout history, poor families would have tons of children so they could be put to work.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:36 PM
-37

Let's say a man is a drunk, woman divorces him, raises kids, man pays child support, woman actually spends it on the kids, for good nutritious food. This is the ideal case, right? Even then, why is this okay? The woman made a bad decision in mate selection and needs to be "punished" for it, and by punished I mean no free money. The kids are supposed to suffer. They're hers. What happens to them is supposed to be a consequence of her. I know you feel sorry for the kids because they didn't do anyt…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:35 PM
9

Imagine how much less income inequality there would be if we didn't have all these kept women running around giving away all this money they didn't earn to enrich giant corporations for a bunch of junk products they don't need.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:27 PM
7

No parents don't ask for it. They don't know that $100,000 belongs to them. The doctor steals it. Pediatricians aren't misinformed either. They do it because they hate men.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:25 PM
8

Women shouldn't be allowed to make healthcare decisions. It's a man's wallet paying for that.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 11:00 PM
1

AI sex dolls will have a "consent chip" mandated by government, just like regular AI is gimped to write like a high schooler trying to flatter his leftist teacher and reach a minimum word count.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:56 PM
3

You know that simp will change his tune the moment you mention circumcision. That's different.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:52 PM
2

It doesn't matter if you lose. Force your stupid feminist lawyer to put work into it. Force the opposition to spend money fighting it.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:49 PM
2

Reminds me of NPR. When they first started they had a comment section, they touted the democratizing force of free speech on the internet. Later it was decided that giving people free speech was too long a leash.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:47 PM
9

Society is arranged around class, not sex. Feminists try to make it about sex in order to protect the elite.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:43 PM
9

You have too much money. You should be stripped of all your money, so you can see there's a difference between being a man and being rich.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:41 PM
35

Feminism is the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:39 PM
7

Men didn't like picking cotton. Did they put women to work picking cotton?
/r/MensRights10/05/24 02:27 AM
-3

No they didn't. That's like saying rap music has been around since the stone age because cavemen chanted.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 02:24 AM
3

Women didn't face "issues". Harvard was for rich people, still is. Not some male privilege.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 02:14 AM
-16

I'm talking about men's rights. You're trying to get clicks on a video.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 02:09 AM
-15

Australia is fishing for excuses to stop policing violent crime like robbery, and police thought crime like hate speech instead. It's the transition from capitalism, where property is what matters, to socialism, where wrong-think is the main threat to the elite.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:23 AM
13

That vagueness is intentional in case it needs to serve another purpose. Malala from Krypakistan was circumcised. We need to invade. Oh look at that. Zalala from Jundonisea was circumcised too. Invade. It's no coincidence that feminism finds excuses for war just as easily as it does for circumcision. It's the ideology of the global elite after all.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:52 PM
7

Christianity has been around for thousands of years and circumcision didn't start until it was superseded by science.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:42 PM
4

That aesthetic is pedophilia.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:30 PM
2

I don't know what shakes your barn, because it could be something graphic or something profound. There's no one thing for me, but a lot feminists seem to understand that circumcision can be severely crippling to sexuality and pleasure, and they get off on it, on doing it to their own kids. I read circumfetish stuff sometimes. I can tell the difference between a circumfetishist man pretending to be a woman. It's different. Guys are visual. They fetishist body parts. They talk about abstract strug…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:21 PM
4

Okay church lady. You're here wagging your finger pretending to teach us a life lesson about the pitfalls of hatred. It will ruin your reputation, just like it did to feminism when they said kill all men. After that, all the subreddits banned anyone who was a member of feminism. Not.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:51 PM
5

I'm not the thought police.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:41 PM
5

Not historically.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:37 PM
29

A persecution myth is like a rallying point, around which feminists feel a kind of comradery with each other, for their shared victimhood. They believe they are one misogynist away from the knife. It's a myth because none of them are circumcised or in danger of it. We don't do FGM. Nobody would even know what it is. The men however, in their own lives, are circumcised. FGM had to be invented as something worse, to maintain the delusion and keep circumcision going. If it had any other purpose, th…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:30 PM
6

Yes you said other subs were better. The whole purpose of this thread is that mens rights *unlike other subs* suffers from a bad reputation. And you went on and on about all the bad things we do here, which every other sub does 1000x worse. It's not why we're hated. Clearly. And you know it, which is why you're now derailing into why hate is bad, for our souls, instead of our reputation. Men's rights is hated because it goes against the political agenda, not because of anything we do internally.…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:18 PM
4

You're witch hunting for the real haterz. That's something feminism absolutely does not do.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:09 PM
24

FGM is a persecution myth.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:02 PM
10

I'm banned from the atheist subreddits for complaining about circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:00 PM
5

Men could probably use their own version of battered women's shelter. But sometimes pressure relief valves work too well. The reason we need robustness is to shift the Overton Window. We need men to demand female circumcision, so that when society settles for a simple ban on male circumcision, they feel like they got off easy.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:42 PM
9

100% wrong, on purpose. You know none of this stuff about being "nice" applies to any other sub. In fact, every other sub prides themselves on the strength by which they ridicule and dismiss their opposition.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:37 PM
-1

Men didn't have credit cards until 1970. They didn't exist.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:35 PM
16

Men still aren't "provided" with those. They have to obtain them for themselves.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:32 PM
7

What about scientific folks? The main promoters of circumcision worldwide are the WHO and the CDC. Circumcision used to be religion, but it never spread until the Progressive Era just one century ago. Circumcision is now secular, and science is the new religion.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:30 PM
7

I agreed until the last paragraph. First, I want to echo you and point out that what feminists say about circumcision behind closed doors is the worst stuff I've seen anyone say about anything ever. I don't think there is a lack of empathy in society. Yeah feminism is ruthless, and so are other social justice type groups that "identify" with collective "moral" causes. But to me when I hear the word empathy, I think about busy bodies, people interfering in the lives of others, which is what femin…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:22 PM
8

You practically have more freedom in real life now than on the internet, as long as the person doesn't know your real name and where you work.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:05 PM
-3

The male solution is to take your health into your own hands. I see a huge focus on weight lifting and paleo diets among men who don't hate themselves. It's the female solution that involves running to the collective for answers. Here take more pills. We need to cut funding for healthcare. It's too big and isn't making anyone healthy.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 08:24 PM
3

Debate nothing. Feminists "no-platform" us.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:14 PM
9

This is a fantastic comment. Not what I thought you were going to say, how women get bombarded by creeps and come to see all men that way. No, you went upside their heads. That point about being socially inept, wow, gave me a eureka moment. So much incomprehensible behavior is now so clear. Two reasons. One, we think of women as being socially competent, and men as the awkward ones. It's hard to let go of that idea because it takes being self assured, that for all the little social cues women pi…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:12 PM
1

Anybody who sees your comment is just going to look it up.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:59 PM
-1

If corporations want more money, they just print it. Put it this way. You don't have any money. Corporations don't even want you as their customer. Government is their new customer just like government is a woman's new husband. If Google made money from ad revenue, they wouldn't be handicapping their own search engine with expensive censorship. But their money comes from intelligence agency contracts, to spy on people, rig elections, etc... The search engine is like a side hustle. Have you seen …
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:59 PM
6

If I was on a jury, I would never convict a man against a woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:51 PM
4

Black women have cancer because they're not eating ze bugz. I just saved everyone 20 billion dollars worth of Science. The study, like all public health, is correlation hunting. All they are doing is looking for ways to blame cancer on politically incorrect things without having to prove it. Black women don't go to the doctor enough. Black women drink 2% milk instead of skim milk. Black women are obese because society fat shames them. Blah blah blah. Scientists are inventing reality in order to …
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:49 PM
15

Dating apps are government social engineering. They're nearly as censored and manipulated as reddit.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:44 AM
-1

Dating apps, like all corporations, do not care about money. They spend a ton of money socially engineering a political agenda. Look at how they handle race for example. They don't allow you to filter by race, but they go beyond that. They still ask what race you are. That's because they will curate match results, to increase interracial dating. Who knows what money business they are doing with men and women.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:42 AM
3

There should actually be a law about that. The law of reciprocation. If you want a gun ban, you're not allowed to have private security. If you want carbon dioxide banned, you're not allowed to ride in an airplane. If you hate whites, you must, well, you said it not me. Don't want to get banned.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:35 AM
3

Usually it's not the attractive ones.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:33 AM
18

When everyone goes to college, college no longer has value. Value is inversely proportional to "inclusivity". We want things that are exclusive.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:32 AM
16

You say women are instruction followers. I would say they are rule enforcers, a subtle but important difference. One is passive, the other is passive aggressive. There have been several political threads here lately, and many men on the left have said that they want policies which are "informed by data". This is the same male female difference you are noticing. People "follow the data" the way women scientists follow instructions. If you are informed by data, you are letting the data do the thin…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:19 AM
22

Believe it or not, this sub is heavily censored to make it much less rightwing. I've tried many times to respectfully participate in r/leftwingmaleavocates, and it never takes more than a couple posts to be permanently banned no reason given. If you're on the left, you have the luxury of expressing yourself to people on the other side. It seems you lack conviction.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:27 PM
-4

Left means workers paradise so if it's not workers paradise it's not left. Doesn't it matter that your prescription is the centralization of power into a global elite without competition? How else do you force equality, something that exists nowhere in nature? Trump gave university students due process, Biden took it away. So Trump is left, Biden is right, and everyone is wrong. Got it.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:14 PM
19

In addition to that, the rightwing does not patronize men when it advocates against war, against immigration, etc.. Those are long standing principled views which are very popular. They are never advocated for on the basis of helping males, which is only a relative benefit. Whereas the left is clearly trying to buy votes with absolute forms of discrimination explicitly to hurt men and help women, and boondoggles like free birth control pills, meanwhile the real purpose in that case would be fuel…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:09 PM
-9

Homeslessness is normally discussed as a male problem. But did you know there are homeless women too? Their needs are not being adequately addressed due to the perception of homelessness as a male problem with a focus on homelessness as an historically male problem. We need a more inclusive approach to homelessness that includes all gendereses. In conclusion, there is now strong scientific consensus that female homelessness is a rising problem.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:22 PM
3

Trans is basically Big Pharma. Big corporations can absorb the cost. Small business can't. So big business seeks to impose it as a business model over small business. It's sort of like how big business loves swamping everyone in useless forms and red tape.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:17 PM
5

Women will spend the money on shoes and other disposable goods instead of saving and investing and building generational wealth like men. I'm joking about how extreme it is, but the point is that it forces a shift from saving to consumption, like Keynesian economists told us to do, so that the elite would have greater relative power over us.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:14 PM
6

If it was about profits, it would be hiring meritocracy. You wish it was about profits. We live under socialism now, where corporations are freed from market constraints. It's about a larger political agenda.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:11 PM
6

I downvoted you because I think you're lying. It's pretty obvious being nice is not what gets you respect, as the other comment already quickly pointed out. Your problem is that you're left wing and don't want to face the fact that it's incompatible. And get out of here with that echo chamber crap as if an alternative group could ever blind themselves to the mainstream.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:08 PM
2

Look up oversocialization. Our society is more regulated today, thus more difficult for people who don't fit in. So I think you're right that in the past someone with poor social skills could have had a more normal life because a woman would have needed his money instead of having the government step in to be her husband, with a fake STEM job and all that. But I don't think autism rates where anywhere near as high as they are now because I think the cause is environmental pollution like mercury …
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:02 PM
15

Never forget. Jon Stewart called the boy scouts "gay".
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:00 PM
5

Affirmative Action for Circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:23 PM
-18

It's not a debate. It's bait. Women are laughing at you for taking it.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:21 PM
0

Big talk for someone who just said "Not to say these girls don't deserve the ability to be Eagle Scouts". Why do girls deserve the ability to be eagle scouts?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:18 PM
2

For some *reason* the OP thinks rape is evenly distributed.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:41 PM
12

I used to make female dating profiles, capture a bunch of messages from guys, and then reuse them.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 06:23 PM
16

"Okay" is an abstract idea. Women are pragmatic. They don't think that way. Nothing is "okay" or "not okay". It just is. You only call things that way when it's useful. Hence it's okay when I do it but not when you do it. There's no more thought to it than that. Men can see the whole picture.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:55 PM
2

Whenever you see that stuff, you need to amplify it. It's good for us.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:09 PM
5

Trump was a surprise victory and the establishment clamped back with mail in voting. Too late to wake up.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:08 PM
4

How can you give the press freedom? They're the ones who withhold freedom, from us.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:06 PM
2

Call the bluff, only good response.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:04 PM
9

Why do people post videos and links without saying anything about them?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:18 AM
0

Good story. Rings true. You should have propositioned your boss though. That's how women do it. They sleep their way to the top. You had your chance and blew it.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:26 PM
1

Why can't America be more like Scandinavia, asks Bernie Sanders.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:23 PM
0

You're taking the bait. It's not serious. Imagine a level playing field, no internet censorship. Battered women could be asked "Would you rather be robbed or raped", and then you could explain to them how being robbed is much worse because of all the lost time you spend working to earn back the money. You could ridicule them for being class privileged and not having to work for money or else they would understand how hard it is. Put a price on rape. Maybe it's only worth $1000 not to be raped.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:50 PM
6

Feminists would laugh and say, "that's capitalism". The problem is it's not capitalism. It's socialism. That's your foreskin and they're stealing it, just like they steal fetuses from abortions. Feminism like both abortion and circumcision because they both feed the pharma cartel.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:12 PM
1

That's nice to hear. I'm sure you can break the cycle. I think just being aware gets you a lot of the way there. In the bad cases I hear about, the mother has usually poisoned the relationship between the daughter and the father, so the daughter never realizes the mom was the problem. I think those are the ones that remain messed up. For men, there's a belief that a son will seek out a partner who resembles his mother. Same thing. The son either ends up with baby mama drama, or finds a woman com…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:11 PM
75

Vice President Mike Pence had the right idea. Don't meet with females unless your wife is present, in order to protect yourself from false accusations.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 08:42 PM
1

Men bad, okay? NPC meme banned because it hits close to home.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:15 PM
5

Equality doesn't exist in nature. But you had to put in that disclaimer because we're all conscripted in a war against nature.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:14 PM
3

Or as a "Scientist" would say, take a shower.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:11 PM
15

A female slut may feel unfulfilled, but she doesn't have to work. And it's a choice, her own doing. Incel is involuntary.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:08 PM
8

Superior beings. They have a great wiki. Their approach to understanding male female behavior is the only thing resembling science you can find out there in the world today. Reddit, including "mensrights", doesn't allow them. That's how I know mens rights can never come from here. Imagine if a feminist group said "feminazis not welcome". Imagine them acknowledging there is such a thing. But men's rights will eagerly spit on their own, to curry favor with the enemy. Let's face it. We're all incel…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:35 PM
6

They do whatever the US "intelligence community" tells them to do.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:29 PM
3

A society that doesn't hate itself would be looking for protection from childless women, instead of from incels. I agree that the OP made a great observation. Women get together ostensible because of shared dislike for children, turns out they are more interested in disliking men. Something else is going on. It's a cover. If a bunch of women got together because they hate ice cream, and it turned out they all hated men too, even more, what is the connection?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:26 PM
1

Nobody is doing any of that mental hoopla. You can't feel collective historical oppression. Do these women not have to work for a living? Their lives are completely pain free?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:20 PM
1

They reject anything with an image of strength.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:17 PM
1

Would it be okay for whites to be scared and fear all black people? No. We'd send them to reeducation camps. We should do the same for women who are scared of men.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:15 PM
2

Science.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:13 PM
2

Health and Human Services? lol they'll just offer a complimentary circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:10 PM
3

Consider that it may not be the absence of the father that causes the problems, but rather the presence of the mother. The mother causes daughters to have mental issues and sons to be criminal, because the mother is a certain type of female. The presence of a father would reduce it, but only the absence of the mother would stop it. There's a popular Peer Reviewed study that says lesbians make the best parents. The main argument of the Scientists was that the kids were very passive and had few be…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:02 PM
64

Women anything is a bad idea because they simply have too much power.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:49 PM
1

Men and women work well together on farms, as husband and wife. They don't work well together in an office. An office is a very artificial environment, where leftism/corporatism demands that you be "colorblind" and not notice what sex someone is, because that would mean workers aren't interchangeable/disposable.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:48 PM
3

A large portion of women have experienced sexual assault?! Why are even men's rights advocates tacitly accepting feminism? A large portion of women have not "experienced sexual assault" whatever that means. "Sexual assault" is extremely rare. It's also not like regular assault. It's touching. You sat next to a women on a bus or something. Boo hoo. They'll live.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:44 PM
1

Al-CIAda? That would be a pyrrhic victory, like conservatives electing Dick Cheney's pig daughter or something. I like they way you're thinking though. I'm inclined to stick to principles, like a man, but intellectually I know we have to be pragmatic, like a woman. Usually it pays for a movement to have a vanguard, a group out in front to take the heat, and group that trails behind to claim a series of soft victories incrementally. It just occurred to me that there is not even a portion of the w…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:58 AM
1

This is terrible advice. The tactics that work for those in power aren't going to work for us. They have media control. We're a thorn in their side.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:43 AM
12

When is it not? Circumcision is child abuse. Men's Rights will ban you if you say feminism is responsible for circumcision though.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:38 AM
2

Being mainstream is what makes it an echo chamber. Anything alternative is hidden from view.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:58 PM
1

The men are all MGTOW and the women are polygamous.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:56 PM
-1

Have you seen the dancing nurses?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:53 PM
1

I think it should be mandatory to have AI naked pictures of every celebrity. If we're going to allow them to have millions of dollars without working, the least we can do is take away their privacy, and stop protecting their likeness with intellectual property laws. Can't wait for when CGI can make actors obsolete.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:49 PM
1

Funnily enough this very thread has just now been banned.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:23 PM
1

Demographically, liberals tend to be young, female, and uneducated. Not that they won't go on to spend a lifetime in academia, they just aren't there yet. Gallup asked what percent of the population is homosexual. They thought it was near 50%. These are the major consumers of media.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:20 PM
1

This is a perfect example of what the study found. The left is so sheltered they believe the same Fox News that fired Tucker Carlson is somehow extreme.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:18 PM
1

As America becomes more liberal, you have no choice but to blame conservatives even harder for the bad outcomes. It's just like how feminism is strongest in Sweden, not Saudia Arabia.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:13 PM
2

In both cases, you disregarded the question of what's true, in favor of what's nice.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:09 PM
1

This forum bans you if you aren't feminist enough. They walk a tight line just to be allowed on reddit.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:07 PM
5

Doctors don't take vitamins seriously. Because they might work.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:03 PM
-8

I would consider a scientific study to be invalid on the grounds that it's an appeal to authority. Anecdotes are always valid because they can be judged for believability and not taken on faith like a study.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:01 PM
-1

Women are Big Pharma's favorite customers. They consume something like 80% of all healthcare. The are not dismissed. However, that doesn't mean they aren't victims. Just not in the way they think. Big Pharma will gladly throw pills at you. You could say they aren't taking you seriously. Welcome to real life. Try being a man. Big Pharma never cured anything, but they throw a ton more stuff at the women's problems. Curse or blessing? The feminist can't see past her own very long nose and will neve…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 09:57 PM
-1

Notice how all the leftist tech companies like Google aren't celebrating it. They have some obscure non-white woman artist on the homepage. It's like a middle finger to workers to put an artist there. That's how leftists think. It's not a coincidence.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:23 PM
1

Why do you want moderators?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:20 PM
1

Why do you want moderators?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:20 PM
1

You're accusing people without power of being just as bad as people with power.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:11 PM
1

Female provocation.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:04 PM
3

The left is going to fix that, to make sure there is no solidarity between workers.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:02 PM
3

Did anybody think to ask how this makes money? Does the government pay him? How does social engineering sell product?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 06:10 PM
1

That it had nothing to do with domination of men by elites.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 06:09 PM
11

Tell people on the left that blacks get 25% longer prison sentences than whites and watch them cheer. Then tell them men get 2500% longer prison sentences than women and watch them foam at the mouth.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:58 PM
-30

Most people don't actually "hate" men or women, just like most people aren't literally "afraid" of homosexuals. "Misandry" is a bogus left wing concept just like homophobia. When the woman in the OP didn't know what misandry was, she was doing our work exposing the language police.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:54 PM
7

Instead of subjecting women to the hassle of looking through profiles, they could use AI to rank men, and filter out all but the top 10%. These men could be assigned dates with women according to a calendar they fill out with time slots for when they are available. Allowing people to choose their own dates leads to all sorts of illegal discrimination. Bumble can put 70% of their employees to work protecting them from liability for this.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:49 PM
6

I've tried. They don't allow it.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:21 PM
1

It's still homosexual.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:20 PM
2

Circumcision came from the same progressives. A good book on the subject is the Progressive Era by Murray Rothbard. https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Progressive%20Era\_0.pdf
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:19 PM
1

It's the opposite. The provocateurs are the ones with entire subs like r/menslib where the peddle the leftist fiction that men can achieve rights like women did by asking authority nicely.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:07 PM
2

Step 2: Arrest the accusers for fraud.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:30 AM
0

Infiltrated? Social Justice exists to place blame on anything other than the rich. I'm not sure how you can see that and still think the right is the establishment side. The left, being mostly young, female, etc... is the side ripe for marketing. Since this is an MRA forum, you should note that there is a huge political divide between married and unmarried women, but no such divide between married and unmarried men. As a side note, Big Oil also funds global warming. BP Shell and Exxon founded th…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:26 AM
0

And all that tax money goes straight to Pfizer and Zelensky.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:16 AM
1

Then why are you a Democrat?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:11 AM
25

What stops the woman from cheating on you?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 04:07 AM
9

But she was the one following you! How did you pay? Did you get out of it? Anything happen to her?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 03:42 AM
22

You mean Violence Against Women Act. It was a hate crime.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 03:32 AM
89

Women are learning to make lots and lots of accusations because there's no punishment.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 03:30 AM
2

I don't know if we're allowed to mention Pfizer yet, but the left has a love affair with corporate fascism. They want workers fired for comments on social media.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:38 AM
3

Reddit has an awful lot of censorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 02:30 AM
58

So she's in jail now, right?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:02 AM
303

Not enough. You have to actively disbelieve "victims", and prosecute them for lying. Why isn't she in jail now?
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:01 AM
0

Ukraine lost when they allowed NATO and the CIA into their country.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 01:53 AM
2

But all the peers agreed. You should write a letter to the peers to inform them that they missed these Methodological Flaws.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:55 PM
26

Exactly. Feminism is a class war by the elite. Always has been.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:51 PM
26

It's not even sex is it? It's like, "look at me while I take a shower". Why shouldn't Harvey Weinstein hire people who like to look at him in the shower? These bimbos don't have any talent, and that's why he can get away with hiring someone who looks at him in the shower rather than someone who's good. It's not competitive. These women hit the jackpot, free money without talent just by looking at Harvey Weinstein in the shower. I wish I could do that and not have to work. Feminism always looks o…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:50 PM
1

I answered in depth elsewhere, so I'll give another example here, a trivial one. We are told FGM makes it so women can't orgasm. But circumcised women report increased ability, just like circumcised men. If you look at it anatomically, even a "severe FGM" that removes the clitoris doesn't really remove the clitoris because the clitoris is internal. So obviously it doesn't stop orgasm, nor would it ever be intended to. Most FGM doesn't even involve any tissue removal at all, unlike male circumcis…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:03 PM
1

There are upvotes, but the comments are all antagonistic, by people who don't know what to make of it. This sub is rightwing relative to reddit, but still leftwing in the absolute. Hearing "it's bogus" over and over isn't helpful to anyone.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:51 PM
2

Do Jews want everyone to be Jewish? I agree with what you're saying, and in a way it's not that different than what I said, just the degree of feminist agitation, being more passive or aggressive. It just doesn't feel like it explains enough. Circumcision is a secular medical practice backed by scientific consensus. These things don't all fall into place without orchestration.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:45 PM
1

The world of confusion. Any observations you don't dismiss as random coincidence?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:39 PM
1

Oh.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:32 PM
0

Just noticed you said I'm trying to trick people into not arguing. I'm in a men's rights forum preaching to the choir. Are you lost?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:29 PM
0

Just pretend I filled my post with a bunch of numbers. You can say my numbers are wrong and your numbers are right because they're more official. Same thing. You know exactly where that leads. The WHO and CDC with the final real true official trusted consensus, that men are no good.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:22 PM
9

Socialist payment schemes take all pressure off the price. If the person having the pregnancy is not the one paying for it, the filthy hospital gets to charge whatever they want. Same with birth control pills. They cost about a fifth of a cent. But because we pay for them through manditory insurance, they cost $3000 now. Sandra Fluke was a feminist and a Big Pharma rep, which always seems to be one and the same.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:11 PM
5

The consequences are artificial. The solution is financial abortion.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:09 PM
1

The bolsheviks were a tiny minority. I believe they had success in part due to kicking out the moderates, the uncommitted. It's the opposite of what we hear in media/school/etc... If you're going to be an intactivist, you cannot go around apologizing for the enemy. Nurses circumcise. Nurses are obese. You cannot be afraid to let the gauntlet down. This is a group of people that is clearly very unhealthy, clearly as wrong about circumcision as they are wrong about the foods they eat. They are pro…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:02 PM
3

Bill Gates is a non-Jewish feminist.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 06:34 PM
-15

Facts are meaningless things pulled from an endless ocean filled with them. Facts require interpretation, which requires philosophy. This is why science can only describe, not prescribe. This is why people who hate philosophy have turned science into a religion. The Science Says. This is why I would never use a fact in an argument.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 06:30 PM
-1

I'm describing the world and you're saying it's wrong because it's okay that it's bad because you can still teach your son to navigate it. I agree we have to do that. But that small act of self protection requires understanding what you're dealing with, not this leftwing hand waving about how nobody's out to get us. That whole schizophrenic ideology is based on oppression so hidden, it takes 50 years of university research to even discover it. What is the right age, on Jeffry Epstein's island? I…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 06:06 PM
-3

A lot of people on the left have the idea that women gained rights by organizing, and if men did the same, they could have rights too. It's been a spectacular failure. Next step is identifying why. The left seems to hate the word elite, and the word conspiracy even more. But clearly there are vested interests that conspire against us.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 05:43 PM
3

Women go after the kids in order to get the child support. If the father gets to see the kids, he will find out the money isn't being spent on them.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 03:59 PM
-1

That's racist. I'm sure you will say it's socialist healthcare or something (even though Americans consume far more) and not about them having the highest percentage of white people. That's just a coincidence. Four coincidences in a row.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 06:18 AM
1

Are you sure it's social democracy not democratic socialism? But you're right I wouldn't do this because all I see is opportunity to mandate more money for "mental health" brought to you by Feminism's best friend Big Pharma.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 06:17 AM
13

Then why not circumcise both men and women and make money from labia? Everyone always says it's about money, and yeah that makes sense. But I think it's more than that. Money isn't even real for these people. Big Pharma is quasi government. If they want money they just call the bank and tell them to add another zero. This is about destroying and controlling men's sexuality. There's a tactic the other side uses without fail. They accuse you of doing what they're doing. They say we mutilate women'…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:53 PM
62

What's most ironic about that is that countries either circumcise both, or males only. No one circumcises just females.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:42 PM
0

Bill Gates isn't Jewish. What's his reason? Curry favor with the Jews? Maybe. But science is clearly the new religion of the left, hence your confused defense/attack on religion.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:40 PM
-8

LeBron James is a black man. Would police shoot him on site? Black Lives Matter is something rich whites wield to punish poor whites. Same as feminism. A huge portion of feminism is about erasing the concept of limited government so that the "patriachy" has full power to lock anyone away in the prison industrial complex without evidence. Feminists demand harsher speeding laws for goodness sake.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:34 PM
3

Men could simply organize and get rights like women do, from the rights-giver-person. But for some reason they don't. And don't use the word conspire. The mind of a leftist is a work of art.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:28 PM
10

How is feminism not just a front for the elite?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:02 PM
24

Notice how bold the left is. They don't simply violate the law quietly. They make it into a big announcement. Who's going to stop them? Who's going to put reddit moderators in jail for violating the first amendment? No one.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:03 PM
2

No jail time.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:01 PM
2

I'm sure there's an incel wiki page on how to spot it in the teacher's facial structure. I've seen it. But what's the real problem here? It's just the double standard, right? Girls pretend to be 21 so they can go to clubs and have sex with guys. It should be the girl that gets arrested for fraud, not the guy for "rape".
/r/MensRights25/04/24 08:54 PM
3

No you shouldn't. What does your boss have to do with this? It's your problem.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 07:37 PM
6

She supports "men's mental health" because she supports Big Pharma, not men. She wants to destroy men, with Big Pharma. No she doesn't have a right to "feel uncomfortable".
/r/MensRights25/04/24 07:34 PM
-2

Poland should put Poland first. Kick out NATO.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 07:32 PM
1

Dox them and tell the "providers".
/r/MensRights25/04/24 06:04 PM
78

He was a massive contributor to Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 05:55 PM
8

Notice that they leave out rich. The left will not talk about classism.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 05:55 PM
44

The top promoters of circumcision are the CDC and the WHO. Circumcision is part of secular medical Science.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 05:52 PM
0

My understand has always been that transsexual is real and that transgender is fake and for the perks, so I agree.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:39 AM
1

No. The person who calls the cops first wins.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:18 AM
6

The left will never allow you to "just grill". Being left alone isn't an option. They want early voting, late voting, repeat voting, etc... always finding new ways to inject themselves into your life.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 08:20 PM
-25

THEY didn't have their official pronouns approved by trusted authorities yet. OTHERWISE youtube would have listed them in the official pronoun box next to they's name. Got it, zwe?
/r/MensRights23/04/24 08:13 PM
2

The purpose of propaganda against Japan is to get them to open their borders and destroy them with immigration.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:37 PM
0

This is leftwing privilege to think echo chambers must exist on both sides. You don't realize that rightwing views are not "engagement hacked". They are censored. Only the left is in a bubble. The right couldn't be in one if they tried, because the mainstream is unavoidable.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:30 PM
1

Equality doesn't exist in nature. It's a very artificial thing, hence the uphill battle. Do you have to advocate for gravity, or does it just exist?
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:24 PM
35

Did they expect the opposite? Why didn't the doctors warn them of this side effect?
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:20 PM
0

Those are unfortunate examples. People didn't used to get cancer or die in car wrecks. Cancer is a modern lifestyle disease. Technology has enabled poor lifestyles. Technology begets problems that must be solved with ever more technology. I agree with him the pill should be illegal. How did anyone survive before they discovered drinking horse urine in 1960?
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:13 PM
1

As a woman, you don't care about destroying your man's health with pills.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:11 PM
2

Same experience. I suspect some guys have poor control, due to circumcision, and give pull out a bad rap. I like your theory on the whole high school microscopic holes in condoms thing. Paternity fraud makes a lot more sense. School also tried to convince everyone that they would get AIDS from microtears in skin.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:09 PM
5

You attacked men by arguing that charities should give to women only.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:58 PM
6

One thing is for sure. People who want to destroy society know that single mothers are the key.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:55 PM
2

No you don't. You start off describing a study as "fun", then quote someone who complained that it didn't include "verbal abuse" as violence. So no, you don't think using a knife is violence, because you don't know what you think. Domestic violence isn't part of your life and this is just an academic game for you, pretending this study is "flawed" as if other studies are real. I'm not familiar with this study because I've seen enough studies to know they're all fake. But I have enough life exper…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:53 PM
9

Ask if she's circumcised.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:24 PM
3

Women's achievements. She doesn't like men's reaction to these posts, the same way the king doesn't like the way the peasants squabble when he makes a new decree.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:23 PM
4

Women go into pediatrics, so they can circumcise boys.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:09 PM
2

Correlation equals causation isn't a "flaw". It's epidemiology. It's a fraud.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:07 PM
4

Science looks for a correlation then just makes up whatever explanation it wants.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:05 PM
6

No AI would allow you to do that.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:00 PM
6

The most ridiculous thing is Leftwingmaleadvocates will come out and say he's a right winger.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:58 PM
-4

He lost last time. But mail in voting makes it 100% unaccountable.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:57 PM
1

Trump was the only real president. Everyone else, Kamala Harris or whoever, is just a puppet for the global elite.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:56 PM
1

Pretend you have money.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:53 PM
7

Time to become transgender.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:51 PM
17

Single men are the only ones paying anything into the system thanks to women's subsidies like Universal Big Pharma. Public school is no joke either. Over $30,000 per student per year in major cities.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:50 PM
2

The Greatest Ally government is seeking to wipe out "Nazi Ukrainians", just like in the Holodomer. Zelensky has a house in Miami Beach Florida. America installed him into power, ultimately to destroy us. We're the new Palestinians in our own country. Now you know the real reason American leftists love this war so much.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:46 PM
5

Send Ben Stiller there too.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:42 PM
6

Women have no choice but to go anorexic because TV showed a skinny woman. So much pressure. Can't stop eating cake.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:03 PM
1

I blame elites. Feminists are just their wives.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:01 PM
2

When women are unfaithful, they don't consider it unfaithful.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:00 PM
3

I've never see a more censored forum than reddit.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:58 PM
-2

Kingdom, species, genus, order. Those are stereotypes. A male has xy chromesomes? Tell that to someone assigned trans.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:56 PM
4

This is another example of female privilege, believing that doctors take men seriously, and expecting them to take you seriously. Why do you want that? Why do you respect doctors so much? They're awful. Stop going. Only thing a doctor knows is how to put you on pills and dismiss any concerns. And of course women are attracted to that and seek out more.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:26 PM
7

I think the difference is men know when they're lying. Women think they aren't lying.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:22 PM
4

I bet all the moderators are men too.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:21 PM
3

Women are privileged, which affects behavior. For example, a woman may not be a gold digger, but the option of divorce is always there for her. Or a women is able to be financially independent because of make work STEM jobs or free healthcare, and becomes dependent on government rather than dependent on a man like she would be in a state of nature.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:20 PM
-3

Science makes generalizations. Biology is nothing but generalizing.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:15 PM
3

Probably moderators censored the post at first.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:13 PM
3

Not King of the Hill.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:12 PM
-7

Corporations only care about money. That's why there's a version of The View for all the racist sexist white men I keep hearing about... It's not like they would just peruse some bizarre social engineering agenda.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 07:35 PM
11

I think it's much harder to switch from job to job now, because all jobs are very technical and specialized. They require degrees and licenses. People were able to try out different professions a lot more in the past. Feminism is part and parcel to this regulation of society. It demand everything be locked down, "for our safety", but really to protect the status quo. Why would you think this post would get you banned? Men Rights bans people for being too hardcore, not for being soft.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 07:31 PM
-11

Not defending her. She should be in jail for equality. But is it bad that she did that, or is it just unfair that if a man did that to women he'd get the death penalty? I don't think you can have a functional society where "crimes" can only be known in the minds of the "victims". If you don't like something, it's your job to remove yourself from the situation. If it's your boss, Harvey Weinstein didn't have to hire you. You can go back to being poor. Feminism is like a way for elites to infiltra…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:34 PM
1

Sexual assault isn't rape. It's touching.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:17 PM
27

The honesty means more than most people realize. It reveals their standing within the movement, as the ones who don't know the inside baseball.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:16 PM
-3

I think you have it completely wrong. You're misunderstanding both what they are, and what power they have. TERFs have zero power, because it's not part of the globalist agenda. Lots of movements are extremely popular yet have zero power. Anti-immigration for example. So it's not something to ever worry about regardless of how many of them there are. Just like when feminists say they're personally against circumcision. It doesn't change that feminism is a pro-circ movement. The reason TERFs don'…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:15 PM
3

You must be rich to work for free. Why is it Marxists are always rich? This "no work" stuff is all Trustafarians. Normal people can't do that.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:57 PM
-2

Marxists are the system. Otherwise I like your point.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:55 PM
0

Lack of unity is a reason the elite put women in the workplace.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:54 PM
1

The left advocates for workers to be fired if they're caught posting in an MRA forum.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:53 PM
-22

What debate? There's nobody on the other side.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:51 PM
14

Platforms are liberal to the degree that they censor. A free speech platform would be 100% right wing and zero women.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:48 PM
40

I have some "friends" who were all shadowbanned by the mods.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:47 PM
3

I notice in childhood that society lets girls be feminine or tomboy, but no one likes a sissy. Men fight against tyranny. Women fight for it. Competition versus cooperation.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:46 PM
2

What is true toxicity? If I beat you up at school to impress a girl? That's neither masculine nor toxic, and it wouldn't make sense to speak about it in those terms anyway. It's called being p*ssy whipped. Maybe that's "feminine toxicity", because the woman is using her femininity to abuse a man. But that highlights the absurdity to describe it like the problem is she went overboard with her femininity, into "toxic territory". Who came up with that? Someone who's testing us, like the OP said.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:43 PM
0

It's actually better for their country to "lose", and shake off US CIA control. Imagine if Iraq had beaten America and America had to take a break from all the invasions for a while. War facilitates communist government control, command economy. They get to ration food, all sorts of things.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 06:00 PM
8

Yes! Men like this enable all the bad behavior we see from women. Every group has their own Uncle Toms. We call em white knights and simps.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:53 PM
2

With American tax dollars. Why do you hate America?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:51 PM
7

If they did, they wouldn't be credible.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:49 PM
1

The peers looked at it and they said it was sexist. Now what?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:25 PM
1

Now? I've never seen a study where they removed gender from applications and fewer men got hired. It's always been the reverse.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:24 PM
1

How about youtube channels? Gotta fix that.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:23 PM
4

Loan forgiveness would be a transfer of wealth from men to banks. There are two ways to "forgive" a loan. 1. The bank made a bad bet, thinking it could give money to a woman for women's studies and get repaid. The debt is erased and the bank must suck it up. 2. The loan is still good, but the bank will now collect from men who had nothing to do with it, instead of from the women who actually incurred the debts. 1 isn't an option. No leftist ever talks about real loan forgiveness. Their goal two-…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:16 PM
-5

Afraid of competition are you? It's almost like you support universities because they're bad.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:15 PM
4

Wow that's high. If you ever took biology class, and saw that it was like 80% women, a certain kind of women, you know they were all there to marry a doctor.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:11 PM
3

No it isn't. Education has extremely low value, and that value tends to be for the elites, in advisory roles for authority. Education should be illegal just like healthcare, because just like how healthcare doesn't make you healthy, education doesn't make you intelligent.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:09 PM
-3

The final solution? Round up these women and put them in jail. They're not hard to identify.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:06 PM
0

What happens once you get 100% of people into college?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:04 PM
2

No. You will see more subsidies. Negative ROI must mean it was too expensive. It couldn't be that education wasn't valuable. Good heavens no. High debt is already a talking point, for the purpose of bailing out the banks that loaned the money, so that the schools can keep doing it.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:57 PM
2

Yes it's bad. First of all their debt is our problem because we'll be forced to bail them out. Keeping women in school/playtime longer is useful to the system. They're building an army, and the barrack is going to suck even more money from the rest of us the more it grows. This is not different than healthcare. Women consume the vast majority of it, and it's the biggest most powerful industry in the world. You're going to have Universal Big Pharma, Universal Child Warehousing, and Universal Redu…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:55 PM
3

This is why The Science is kept behind closed doors. If anyone saw the actual videos, they'd laugh.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:49 PM
1

Unlike single moms, which is the default, a single dad has to be exemplary. That's the problem for her. She's not looking for a husband. She's looking for someone she can rope into paying for her own kids. She's like one of those people who pretends to be homeless by the side of the road begging for money, and then a limo comes to pick her up at the end of the day.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:46 PM
4

It's your fault. Why would you "support Ukraine", whatever that means? America invaded Ukraine and overthrew their government. They're killing Ukraine in order to kill America.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:41 PM
7

How about I was a feminist until I had a son? Is it even possible to have a son and a daughter and not see that the son is worse off?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:38 PM
-5

Why don't you go fight? I can't even afford food anymore thanks to your lockdown.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:37 PM
11

Is this because feminism is mostly women and women are more narcissistic than men? Or is it because all left wing groups attract narcissist regardless of what they're about? The Science believes correlation equals causation (epidemiology) so unfortunately there is nothing here to help us understand anything about the natural world.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:07 PM
2

I see you also posted this on r/leftwingmaleadvocates. I was going to post a more serious response there, but it turns out I am now banned. Who knows why. Never takes long. I think asking for strict criteria or any kind of written list of goals sort of thing is a serious misunderstanding of feminism. A big part of leftism is that rules must be ever-changing, to keep the worker bees on their toes. Arbitrary changes, and the more arbitrary the better. That old statue in the park is now racist and …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 07:50 PM
-23

You making videos like this just confirms it, in the minds of people who want to think Indians have no game. It's like the more you insist you aren't something, the more you must be that thing or you wouldn't have even bothered defending against it. The lady doth protest too much. It's often not good strategy to defend yourself. Go on offense instead. Like Donald Trump. I don't know if you can do this with the left, but with the right, it would help to have a sense of humor and be able to laugh …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/24 12:55 AM
-1

Not enough money goes to healthcare because healthcare is consumed by women and sexists men don't like that. If men used more healthcare, Big Pharma would be rich. err richer.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:24 AM
-1

Instead of Universal Big Pharma and Universal Child Warehousing, which we should be punishing not rewarding, we ought to have things people actually need, like Universal Food and Universal Housing. Ever hear anybody on the left mention that? No. They already have those things, silly. But the big other essential is human love and affection. Prostitution is no replacement, but it's the least every human is entitled to. Sex is a human right, say feminist and lgbt. The government should be providing…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 11:17 PM
0

Yes, the right was tricked into voting against their own interests, by unapproved internet comments no less. Whereas the left's entire platform is based on altruism and self sacrifice for the greater good. Immigration is the absolute worst thing for the working class. You can't find a bad word about it from any trusted authority. The elite would have stopped it overnight if it was bad for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 10:53 PM
-2

It should matter what's true, not what's moral. Rockefeller called competition a "sin". He climbed the ladder already. I'll try to explain what I mean better. You say activists compete for a piece of the pie. So for example feminists ought not to like lgbt taking up the limelight all of a sudden. There are even specific issues like trans sports where they would seem to be in direct competition. Yet they embrace each other rather than marginalize each other. Isn't feminism taking a risk by allowi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 10:42 PM
1

I can see that there's some of both, yeah. When you say progressive, I'm thinking of a person who is at least politically aware enough to call themselves by that name, not some random teenage girl of no consequence. And in my experience, I would never underestimate someone on the left, because they always seem well versed in tactics, above all else. What I mean is if I try to talk to someone on the left about some issue, like inflation. It doesn't matter what issue. They don't seem to have a goo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 10:20 PM
1

The original progressives wanted to circumcise both sexes, for science, but we never did it. If it's happening in a cave in Africa somewhere, you don't even have a way of knowing about it, unless Feminism went looking for a new reason to start a war. Malala can't go to school cause she's a girl. They could literally invent anything, and the solution is always the same. Time to bomb Iran. John McCain is a feminist hero.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 10:11 PM
37

I mentioned it here a few days ago. We used to have the internet. Before the iPhone. Now we don't even have boy scouts. Do you think the other side isn't aware? If men are allowed to get together and start talking, pretty soon there will be another six million rounded up in camps. That's what they tell us anyway.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:04 PM
1

People don't care about "sins", especially if they don't share your progressive religion. This "broadly egalitarian society" (you forgot inclusive) is just another marketing term for utopia, and it is zero sum. The "bigots" have to be driven out. Activists don't compete against each other. Feminists and trans cooperate. They only compete against those not loyal to the system/elite/new world order/broadly egalitarian society. Yes circumcision could be banned for both men and woman, but the goal i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 10:00 PM
86

Slaves say they are mistreated. Slave masters say they aren't. It's literally people in their mom's basement versus every powerful institution on the other side. Feminist is the ideology of the global elite.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:22 PM
5

Circumcision is an example of a life saving medical treatment given to men but denied to women. Medical experts agree.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:07 PM
53

Insults should target weakness, but often the insults people choose tell you what's on their mind. Women call men incel/virgin/etc... Maybe women are obsessed with sex, because it's the only thing they have to offer. Lefitsts call rightwingers trailer trash/redneck/etc... Leftists are obsessed with class and social status. Every other insult is illegal, conveniently.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:03 PM
1

Maybe it shouldn't be illegal to send someone a picture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 05:49 PM
5

Conversely, it tells us a lesson about why other women do come forward, and to the media.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 05:47 PM
-3

Why? Are you trying to feed the prison industrial complex? Celebrities are supposed to have naked pictures made of them. That's what they get for being millionaires.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 05:44 PM
-13

Men stopped working for many days during lockdown.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:40 PM
1

Sports are almost as socialized as banking. The stadiums are paid for by taxes. Even the numbers on the jerseys are protected by intellectual property laws.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:37 PM
1

She throws a ball. Shouldn't get paid anything.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:35 PM
43

You know that saying, argue with a pig and you both get muddy but the pig likes it? When I see a male feminist, I imagine it to be like a sexual fetish, and everything makes a lot more sense. It's not just that they're pretending to be feminist to get laid. They want a certain kind of woman, who will see them a certain way. They're vain and need this identity. Very troubled people. When you talk to them, you can see them get excited by thoughts about women being superior and whatnot. Like, they …
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:34 PM
4

You're not going far enough. The common progressive is paying very close attention. This is a war, and it's undeniable when you look at circumcision as the example case. Feminists talk about female circumcision. Man says what about male circumcision. Feminists say he's bringing it up to derail female circumcision. Who hasn't seen this? Does it blow your mind? We don't do female circumcision. Female circumcision is the derailment, a preemptive one. It had to be invented, for the purpose of rhetor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 05:14 PM
9

When you become a public figure, you lose your right to privacy. Or they can give back the money.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:58 PM
-21

But that's true. Torrents are for piracy. That's the purpose. Some people use torrents wrong, for things other that piracy. But that's what it's for. The problem isn't that UK doesn't understand torrents. They understand them very well. The problem is that piracy is the civic duty of every American. Hollywood shouldn't be rich.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:54 PM
163

If you didn't say those things, they would like you, but only as a pet.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:52 PM
1

After reading the other answers here, I still think mine is a more exemplary, banner flag example of misandry, loud and proud, exactly what the OP was asking for. It could be that people like Black Lives Matter and think I'm knocking it. But it's simply a comparison of the sex version to the race version of a fascist (public private partnership) program. It's pushed on us by government and corporations in tandem. If something comes out of nowhere and is instantly everywhere, it's fake. Did they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 04:46 PM
-18

Yes. One is better. Spread the love.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:16 PM
-4

Wow I'd be in jail.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:15 PM
-2

Sometimes joking helps. Just boldy tell you you don't want her taking half your stuff. Women are not attracted to weak men. She will actually like that you asserted yourself. Consider this a test.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:23 AM
1

Choose to work!? You don't have to work?
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:17 AM
0

UK lost WWII.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 03:09 AM
1

Why did he think they were going to arrest him?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:45 PM
-1

If you get killed, you don't care that it was gun violence instead of knife violence.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:43 PM
-1

What's the circumcision rate among random people versus graduate professionals ruled by institutions?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:42 PM
0

Scientific institutions are the reason boys get circumcised. Random people are the reason not everyone falls for it.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:38 PM
-1

Science is very expensive.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:36 PM
2

Now do one for race instead of sex.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:33 PM
3

She's right in her own way. Because as a though leader writing for the left's favorite newspaper, the New York Times, the same newspaper that made up the lie about WMDs in Iraq, her job is not to fix the same problem we want to fix. Her job is to find a way to fit masculinity into the system, a decadent system run by elites. How to make us comply. Our position is the opposite. There's nothing wrong with masculinity. It's the system that's broken and needs to be torn down. Apparently no one reali…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:32 PM
2

The guy who wrote Fight Club sounds pretty right wing extreme to me. He says he reads the Daily Stormer for crying out loud. Do you read the Daily Stormer? And Tyler Durden over at Zerohedge has also been banned from Google search results.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:24 PM
-13

The patriarchy is a system of oppression created to hurt both men and women but it hurts women more, or something.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:23 PM
2

70% of Twitter worked in the censorship department. Less content = more money, obviously.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:20 PM
1

I keep hearing that corporations only care about money, but everything is catered exclusively toward tinier and tinier minorities. It's because government is the new customer, not you, the public.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:14 PM
1

The car is the girl. Why do they always describe a car as "sexy"? How can you have sex with that? Cars look like freak shows now, and all the shows like Motorweek put in female hosts.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:12 PM
1

It's embedded into everything, just like pop music always "features" rap verses now. I can at least listen to Lady Gaga - Telephone No Beyonce version, but I'll be watching a chess video and all of a sudden they start talking about this stupid cam whore who has infested everything to do with the game. It's these women who are bad at chess, like famous for being bad at it, invited to all the tournaments and all the shows just because it's cute that they're girls and they play chess, badly. People…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:09 PM
-2

You know that youtube pushes women into "content creation" just like the New World Order pushes women into STEM. Yet all they can come up with besides cam whoring are makeup tutorials, also sex focused. Makeup is all about sex.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 07:01 PM
1

How hard do you have to work for money? Do you like it that there are women who don't have to work because men just give them money?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:59 PM
2

Actually you forgot Poland.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:56 PM
-9

Cam whore isn't "sex work". They're not having sex. That's my problem. I'm an extremist, not a puritan. It's got to be hardcore or nothing. None of this pretend crap.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:54 PM
-6

Even the porn sites make you sit through ads for cam whores before you get to the video.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:51 PM
-12

First of all there is no algorithm, and hasn't been since at least 2012. Youtube is curated. The algorithm was killed because it was leading people down far right rabbit holes. Good thing corporations only care about money...
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:48 PM
1

How do you get other men to stop simping? Coining the term simp was a good start.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 06:46 PM
5

When you find parallels between things, if you get one wrong, you end up getting the other even more wrong. You say you hear nothing but ad-hominems when you talk to feminists. Same. But is that what you hear when you talk to conservatives? I don't buy it. I don't even know where it would be possible. Conservatives get banned for saying the sky is blue. Being conservative myself, it's very easy to spot when a liberal's idea of a conservative comes only from talking to other liberals. Same as it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 06:35 PM
2

Sounds like the "pathological hate" the OP is talking about is more on the pro-immigrant side than the anti-immigrant side.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:36 PM
1

Triggered is your word. Calling him that is like calling him homosexual. Are you a child?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:35 PM
1

Thanks for taking us seriously. Too many aren't prepared to bridge the gap. It's appreciated more than you can know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:34 PM
5

You're straining to connect two things you don't like. Trump supporters didn't get their wall. Feminists did. It's preposterous to think you didn't notice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:30 PM
1

The left in other countries has banned homeschooling. This isn't something that can be fixed by good people like her working from within the system. There is a concerted agenda to mess up boys as much as possible, and that means forcing them into the system and continuing to degrade it as much as possible. When teachers were getting exposed during lockdown and parents were talking about pulling their kids out, the left got more energized about getting homeschooling banned here. Everyone knows "p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:21 PM
5

"Dark places". I love it when people know you're right so they try to tell you you're "wrong" morally instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:11 PM
-6

The Future is Female is a Democrat and corporate initiative a la Black Lives Matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/24 05:05 PM
2

Record them with a video camera and put it on the internet with names attached. Show it to them and read the comments aloud. Record their reaction too.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 05:00 PM
1

What makes circumcision "medical"? Why give authority to the people most responsible?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:54 PM
2

My favorite feminist/"medically necessary" excuse is that male circumcision prevents cervical cancer in women.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:53 PM
1

Circumcision is Scientific Consensus. The leading promoters are the WHO and the CDC. Doesn't get more committee than that.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:51 PM
9

I don't know what excuses they're feeding the public, but the real reason is because women can't park. China has this. Women's parking spaces in China are outlined in pink and have the female stick figure logo like on the bathrooms. In China they openly acknowledge that it's because women can't park. China doesn't mess around like the West, where everyone in power is afraid of backlash. Germany takes pride in Hitler's autobahn. It's got narrow lanes, no speed limits, and people will still ride y…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:45 PM
3

I go out of my way to make people's lives difficult. You're not supposed to have it easy.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:31 PM
22

You think they don't do that? There are a lot of women with pent up aggression waiting for an excuse to get their jollies by keying your car.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:26 PM
5

Of course no punishment for the girl. It will keep happening until they are made to pay.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:45 AM
1

AI is just a Democrat. Or Democrat intelligence is artificial.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:42 AM
10

Ask yourself, why is it that all these so-called "victims" are so certain that censorship and discrimination will be applied in their favor? Where is this patriarchy? Drunk in a pickup truck out in back of Walmart somewhere?
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:41 AM
3

Is trans also "the real conservatives"? Wouldn't it have to be? Of course women are "conservative" in the literal sense of the word, because they are risk-averse. But nobody would confuse feminism for being a right wing movement unless they were having an identity crisis, which is what I'm saying is going on here. I think leftism is inherently feminine, or anti-male. It seeks to replace competition with cooperation. Now some people would say that's good for men, because men win as well as lose i…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:39 AM
364

Do not get involved with women with kids under any circumstances.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:31 AM
2

Nearly all advertising is meant for women. This rhetoric about men being scared is no different. It is aimed at women. Women are the ones who are supposed to hear it. If a woman hears that a man is afraid of something, that is often her only way of knowing that it's good. "Seeing that they have made someone angry fosters the activists' illusion that they are rebelling."
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:26 AM
5

He's some pedophile with a sexual fetish for circumcised boys. Why don't they find someone else? A feminist woman, make it as insane as possible.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:15 AM
1

Biology says sex is a social construct.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:12 AM
1

They bring in women CEOs to get a bailout from ESG hedge funds.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 01:50 AM
43

And if Donald Trump wins, all the libs are moving to Canada. Because Mexico has too many Mexicans.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 05:40 AM
65

Don't circumcise, and tell all your friends not to do it either.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 04:08 AM
1

Slightly? Non-binary is over-represented here by about 4000%. You know all of them are just right wingers who clicked non-binary as a joke. I always do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:48 AM
1

But nobody's interested in your "gender identity". That's all in your head. They want to know what sex you are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:46 AM
1

And he probably smells bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:45 AM
1

Red pill is gateway to black pill. They are both pointed in the same direction, opposite our leftwing overlords.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:43 AM
2

You have no idea how much this sub censors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:40 AM
1

5 years ago you didn't know what woke was. Woke is just getting started. It's a new evolution of corporatism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:35 AM
1

You believe Jews used to be scapegoated in the same way that men are now scapegoated. Why then can't men follow the path to recovery taken by Jews?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:34 AM
1

Sal would be swiftly booted out of Intersectionality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:23 AM
1

Unless your the kind of feminist who doesn't want trans on your soccer team, or Muslim immigration. Trans came out of nowhere and had power over feminism. How did that happen? Feminism has its own department in every university. They have unlimited money and a huge support base. Did they sit down and decide that trans athletes is beneficial to women somehow? Or is another group steering both of them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:22 AM
1

lol. Got a real Social Justice Warrior here. Even some Jewish groups are anti-circumcision. When is the LGBT going to "intersect" with intactivism? Or do intactivists "qualify" also?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:16 AM
1

You're gay and an MRA. But the LGBT is certainly not MRA. Why are you lumping yourself with them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:12 AM
10

"Mental health" is a problem of affluence. It's not starving Africans eating all the anti-depressants.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:06 AM
1

The CDC and the WHO are religious groups?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:17 AM
1

Why do people insist on blaming Muslims? What power did Muslims have to stop America from going to war with every one of Israel's neighbors?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:16 AM
1

Maybe this is why you don't like Le Pen. The media frames her as an evil Nazi because she's against circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:11 AM
2

Why shouldn't adultery be punished?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:10 AM
1

Religious groups huh? What religion? It's not Christianity. Science is the new religion. Circumcision is a secular practice. The leading proponents are the WHO and the CDC.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:10 AM
1

Health professionals, huh? Nurse Ratchet is your new health professional.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:08 AM
4

Do you ever see feminists questioning all that tuition money being robbed from us and given to sports? Whether feminists intended it or not, it's been used by the elites as a vehicle to funnel even more money into sports.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:04 AM
3

How about nationalism for women and globalism for men? Is there any group more leftwing than the IMF? A literal global government full of experts advising our leaders on how to control us?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:10 PM
48

Hollywood stuck it in every family comedy for laughs, and every horror movie for revenge. I think they make them as like instructional videos. Little brothers and sisters are supposed to sit next to each other while they watch these and the sisters are supposed to learn, see, this is how you control men, and the brothers are supposed to learn, see, women are in control you. Submit.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:57 PM
6

That's probably why America invaded Ukraine and overthrew their president in 2014.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:51 PM
2

People on the right talk jokingly about a "progressive stack", because all these competing interests on the left have to line up somehow when their interests inevitably come into conflict with one another. You could say lgbt is above feminism, but the idea of the progressive stack is a metaphor. It's not literally true. To break it down, LGBT wants more money for Big Pharma. Feminism wants more money for Big Pharma. Everybody's happy. But what if feminism wants more money specifically for birth …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 08:30 PM
-5

Is this the same "society" that fires you from your job if you say MAGA on twitter or don't take all the right pharmaceutical drugs? Yeah, they love making people conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 06:48 PM
2

Completely unsatisfying. This does nothing to address the OP's issue of not being able to discuss the two things collectively without some weasel redefining where that "overlap" is. It's not overlap. It's a tag team. Consider why it just so happened to be that all feminist leadership just happened to be non-TERF. Is that a coincidence or what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 06:42 PM
0

A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not always a square. The pride flag isn't a feminist symbol. It's a new world order symbol. But LGBT and feminism are both part of the new world order. There you go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 06:40 PM
3

Men thrive in competition. Leftists don't want that. They want a controlled society dictated by centralized authority, permanent training wheels. I get what you're saying though, and it does feel like that in a way. Like brutal unfairness, socialized risk and privatized profits. It's just that I think you get a different sense of their endgame if you take in a few more observations. It's way beyond that. Perfect example from this thread, even when men came up with millions of dollars to put the …
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:23 PM
1

If you talk to these progressives about circumcision, I don't think they view circumcision as zero sum. They oppose female circumcision only, but not because of zero sum. Opposing male circumcision actually strengthens opposition to female circumcision. It's something else. It's just an agenda, and they're not mistaken about how they're perusing it, like you think. You're just imagining that they're on the level, like you are, instead of underhanded, which is what they are. Progressives never te…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:18 PM
3

Remember that next time someone says business is greedy and only cares about making money.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:11 PM
6

Have you ever been to a comic book convention? Have you seen these women there? First of all there are two kinds. One kind is prostitutes. They're paid to be there dressed up like anime characters, pretending they like that stuff just to get guys to open up their wallets. You can tell this group apart because they're usually reasonably healthy. But the second group of women, they're some kind of beta females, who also pretend they like that stuff, just because it's an opportunity for them to be …
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:05 PM
2

Men are realistic. Imagine how humans evolved, back in cave man times. Rape was probably an every day thing. Nobody said woe is me and committed suicide from clinical depression. You have to get on with your life. The problem isn't that men don't care about it happening to themselves. That's normal. The problem is that men care when it happens to women, because men imagine that it must be horrible for women, because that's how women make it seem. You remember how Morgan Freedman said the solutio…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:57 PM
0

There's nothing wrong with victim blaming. Victims are often of their own making, especially in today's feminized society where victimhood is an Olympic sport. You locked yourself out of your car? You shouldn't have left the keys inside. It's your fault. You're a "victim" of your own absentmindedness. Your example of men committing suicide is simply an example of when the victim may not be at fault. It doesn't mean victims are always real and should never be blamed. Toxic masculinity wouldn't se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 03:19 AM
6

Circumcision is a pretty obvious example of where a lot of feminists are at odds with feminism. Feminists will say they're against it and so is everyone they know. But feminism is an elite political agenda not driven by what the followers want. It will remain pro-circumcision. The person in the video has no sense of the difference between groups and individuals, or political movements or anything really. His mind has been muddled by politically correct terminology, which as a goal, removes meani…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 03:07 AM
2

Women are risk adverse. They want to trade freedom for security. The elite love this because they get to deprive us of both. The chart has to do with voting and politics, which changes. Men were never "liberal". But women were less at odds with them. Society has shifted to the left, toward greater regulation and control, under centralized authority. Competition has been replaced with cooperation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 03:03 AM
2

Intersectionalism is the elites way of managing competing groups so they all play nice. LGBT wants more money for Big Pharma. Feminism wants more money for Big Pharma. Easy win. If there is a dispute, refer to the progressive stack to see who takes precedence. Feminists must learn to accept trans sports, because trans is more important in furthering the agenda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 02:56 AM
1

Why settle for 99% when you can have 100%? Why are Terfs are excluded from feminism? How was this even able to be accomplished? By random chance everyone who held any authority within feminism just happened to be non-terf? Endless examples. Didn't Trump do a lot for Israel? He gave them the embassy in Jerusalem. But he wouldn't give them a war. So they rejected him. Now they have America back fighting wars for them. Leftists know it's a lost cause to try and bring men into the progressive stack.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 02:50 AM
4

No one is going to help red pill him more than that mom of his with that stupid historical oppression narrative. He can tell even she doesn't believe it. She knows.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:26 AM
1

College is like a social filtering mechanism. Big Business made it illegal racist to give IQ tests to employees. They prefer using college degrees. Not only does it hamper small business, but it also forces all big business, collectively, to focus more on compliance, which is a shared agenda, aka a cartel. As more women go into college, college degree becomes less valuable. Cartels don't survive without really strict enforcement, because the members are still always finding ways to fight each ot…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:24 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:17 AM
1

1 in 5 women are raped? lol. And it's all at fraternity row on Harvard Street. This kind of stuff makes the CDC sound like it's some kind of espionage apparatus for foreign governments. Like you know how we hear that North Korea kills people for not crying hard enough when a leader dies? If you were in North Korea, this is the kind of thing they would tell you about America. They would tell you America is a land of roving street gangs where no one is safe from rape. Aren't you glad you're safe i…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:16 AM
0

Winning an election, like McCain instead of Obama? What is this love affair with democracy and voting? Feminists have this. Women getting the right to vote is always the top achievement. We know how it helped rich people. Women voters are easier to manipulate. But how did it help the poor women it was supposed to have helped? Do you think every dollar in the economy wouldn't be going to Big Pharma if it hadn't been for women voting? Maybe. But again how did it help women that they voted to funne…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:09 AM
1

If voting made a difference, they'd outlaw it. Feminists don't get what they want because they vote. It just looks that way. They get what they think they want because the elites convinced them. What does a feminist gain from us going to war against the middle east? Why do they support that? They are told Malala isn't allowed to go to school because she's a girl. Feminists are no different than any women buying dumb crap they see on TV. Authority tells them what to do.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:59 AM
2

Social credit now. The left has made it so that corporations can completely exclude you from society if you say something online or don't take all the pharmaceuticals. They literally turn off your bank account.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:57 AM
2

Or mail in voting. It's just completely made up now.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:55 AM
0

Yeah but you're powerless. What the article means is that even though you read internet forums and are more informed now, you're "disengaged" because you're excluded from decision making. If you say no to war for example, then you're just not sitting at the table anymore, where the discussion is about whether to go to war with Russia or with Palestine. No war isn't one of the options. Feminists are part of society. They like both those wars. Rich men will tell them what to think, about which one…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:53 AM
1

Feminism does love open borders and H1B visas. I don't think feminists have any idea why. It's not like they're all marrying them.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:47 AM
3

Is this a joke? You think inner city women are signing releases for their aborted stem cells instead of claiming the $300,000 a pop? The clinic just claims it's built into the price.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:41 AM
-1

Let's face it. The pink tax means women are feeding corporate power. If we're ever going to fight back against corporations, we need to take purchasing power away from women and return it to men. Women should not be allowed to keep enriching these corporations, without being punished. We could try banning ads, since 90% of ads are directed at women. Protect them from themselves. Don't let corporations prey on women's weakness for buying shiny plastic crap.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:33 AM
13

Beauty standards for women: Don't get fat Beauty standards for men: Spend 2 hours in the gym every day of your life, and buy more than twice the normal amount of food. ​ The women's standards are passive. The men's standards are active. Men have to work for it. Women are fine the way they are, and all they have to do is not mess themselves up. Gee the science told me I was supposed to eat 12 servings of grain every day. Why do I look like a cow?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:26 AM
0

It sounds true, because psychiatry was all about dirty old men hooking up with rich girls with baggage. Is it any more far fetched than all that crap about having 7 multiple personalities? Please save me doctor, I am a hysterical woman and I don't know what to do. Arrest them both for racketeering.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:20 AM
3

You can tell they made it up just from how they phrased it. "Suffer more from it's adverse effects" is probably code for it's socially taboo for a woman to have a disease because it means she slept with a bunch of "bisexual" men. Africa has socialized medicine, paid for by foreign aid from US taxpayers. Did you know that California made it legal to knowingly give someone AIDS?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:39 AM
1

No they don't.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:35 AM
0

Men's rights can only come from the right. Otherwise, you can't even talk about this because it's homophobic.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:29 AM
1

Scientists want every boy on Ritalin.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:34 AM
1

I don't pay much attention. It seems like a marker for loss of purpose, which I already know is way up. I'm curious if suicide is up in an ethnostate like Israel. Israel has a birth rate above replacement levels, while everybody else is below.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:09 AM
1

Wage war on anybody else? How many countries has Russia invaded versus how many countries has US invaded? US even invaded Ukraine first.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:05 AM
2

Elon Musk mentioned peace talks and the left called him a Russian asset. The leftist regime is pro-war.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:05 AM
0

That's just war propaganda. Even Zelensky said he would do peace talks, until the US instructed him not to. The US installed him into power after all.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:02 AM
1

All of our so called allies do nothing but rob us blind. Ukraine isn't even a real country. It's a territory. That's why it was always called The Ukraine, until the US set it up as a puppet state to instigate more wars. To the elites, Ukrainian men are cannon fodder. Putin isn't fighting them. America is.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:58 AM
1

Mail order brides.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:54 AM
0

Giving aid to Ukraine enriches Defense Contractors and impoverishes American and Ukrainians alike. Your rubbles are worthless now that trillions of hard earned American dollars have been injected into Keev. This is a double whammy. The left is destroying Ukraine in order to destroy America.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:54 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:49 AM
1

They are "nazis" after all. That's why Obama had to overthrow their leader and install Zelensky. Now they are our greatest ally.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:48 AM
1

Do yourself a favor and don't go near those mail order brides. All they want is your money. The only people who support this war are females.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:45 AM
1

Zelensky is not Ukranian. He hates Ukranians. Ukranians are "nazis". The CIA, ahem, sorry lefties, I mean the "Intelligence Community", overthrew Ukraine and installed Zelensky as a puppet. This is a CIA war to eliminate them as cannon fodder. If only they knew Putin was the one on their side.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:41 AM
1

Sure. It was published in a national magazine. If she was the "oppressed" one, you'd be the one with an article in a national magazine.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:38 AM
2

This probably has more to do with pushing for another housing bubble. The last time it happened was after the dot com bubble burst. Paul Krugman instructed the Fed to inflate a housing bubble to take its place. They are engineering the collapse. It's convenient to be able to blame men if it doesn't work out.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:36 AM
6

Marginalized groups commit a lot of crime.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:31 AM
1

Your teacher says crime is caused by poverty. Ergo your teacher believes men must be poorer than women, right? Your teacher is a dishonest liar. You could investigate what causes crime period. High testosterone, low IQ combined with poor impulse control? You could apply all the common excuses for crime and write it like a parody. The question very quickly leads to all sorts of politically incorrect places your teacher is not prepared to handle.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:24 AM
0

I have known people like you who are old now and tell me they regret it and wished they had not passed on so many opportunities to experience life. Sticking to principles like that is probably something that comes naturally to you. Ask yourself what is the point. Are you proving something to yourself? How would you feel if you were still in the same boat in a few years, a few decades? I would change course, and I am normally very stubborn.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:21 AM
28

1 Don't tell people where you work 2 Don't waste time analyzing these things. Understand that women are not principled like men. They are pragmatic. They don't actually think anything is "sexist". They don't even think in those terms. They simply see that it would be useful to call you a "sexist", because they will gain and you will lose. A lot of so called ideology is just a rhetorical game.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:14 AM
41

You need to start thinking tactically, like they do. "Kill all men" is the kind of thing someone on our side would say to sabotage them. You want them to be over the top, to go too far too fast. Accelerationism is our only chance. Next time you see someone say that, upvote them. Draw more attention to it. Loose cannons making careless outbursts like these jeopardize the smooth functioning of the whole regime. Imagine if every feminist was crazed and openly said things like "I want to chop off me…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:06 AM
3

You make some good points about sexual violence. I would go further, but can't do it here without being banned. Suffice to say cavewomen didn't dwell on a rape with everyone filling their heads with thoughts about what a permanent victim they now are. There is a large social attitude component that may be destructive on purpose. I noticed you mentioned "non-whites, queers, and non-westerners" being at the table with feminists. You conspicuously leave out much bigger more obvious divisions like c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 07:25 PM
2

"Mental health professionals" diagnose people as having multiple personalities. Don't even bother reading what they say about something equally made up like bipolar. It's all ad-hoc. The higher diagnosis rate in females could be better explained in terms of female susceptibility to marketing. Women consume more of everything, especially healthcare, all forms of it. Look at hormone replacement therapy. They're diagnosing women with what women can be made to believe they have. Men are a harder sel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 05:51 PM
0

"Expert opinion" is the problem in all cases. People on the left need to resist this temptation to give power away to special people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 07:37 PM
3

The libertarian attitude is it's better to let a thousand guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man. This is a masculine principled attitude. It pertains to an abstract ideal of justice. The leftist attitude is convict now, ask questions later. Or show me the man and I'll show you the crime as Uncle Joe says. It is an effeminate pragmatic attitude. It pertains to a need to minimize risk, by trading freedom for security.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 07:33 PM
-1

I'm not familiar with this guy, but have a similar story about an anthropologist named Turnbull who would write about primitive societies and how they are all sexual egalitarian, oh by the way there was tons of casual rape, but otherwise they were a model of how sexism in modern society is an aberration. It helps to understand the real purpose of academia. They don't exist to broaden our minds with knowledge. We couldn't afford to pay them for that. Most people struggle to afford a house. Academ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 07:18 PM
-5

Can the poor abuse the rich?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 07:01 PM
5

I think they're trying to dog whistle communists. Communism calls everything The People's this or The People's that.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:46 PM
17

Doubt it's the tattoo because I see the same and am guilty of it myself. Men have just terrible social awkwardness and it's everything from autism, low T, to just plain old socially conditioned shyness and lack of confidence. It's good that they're in the gym. You should try to help them. Say something nice to them, since you say you're unassuming. It will probably help a lot. I think a lot of men just go days without speaking to anyone in person. Thank you Dr Fauci!
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:22 PM
5

I look for the nearest cry closet because I am ashamed of my puny girl arms that couldn't fit a humungo jarhead logo in all its glory. Thank you for your service, protecting our greatest ally, Zelensky.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:16 PM
2

I've always wanted to try out being female just to see what it's like. Your theory makes sense except that sex change isn't real. What you're seeing with the industry is a pump and dump scam. Without real demand, this isn't something that's going to take off and make money in the long term like you're thinking. It's very hard to pump it past a certain point. There's never going to be some kind of scientific breakthrough where they figure out how to actually change your sex. It will always be tox…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 04:31 PM
1

It is like drugs. You start with the soft stuff then you need it more and more hardcore. It doesn't sound like you've found a solution. OP will be on his way to bestiality in no time.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 03:52 AM
7

I agree with that too. Medicine is the most corrupt of all. The pills don't work.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:09 AM
1

A troll is an artist, a lie to expose the truth. Or a short seller on Wall Street. He sees something overvalued and bets against it, pushes to force a correction. People hate that but it's necessary. Men's Rights is a troll on society. Anything right wing is trolling. Trolling has a pedigree finer than any German Sheppard. Famous trolls include Jesus, and Zeno. Thanks for including me with them.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 02:07 AM
18

This is not my first rodeo.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 01:54 AM
21

These are liberal women who want liberal men, even though they're not attracted to liberal men. Liberal men are too effeminate for them. But they see on TV all these rich liberal men and think they can have that. It's not real. It's cynical. Warren Beatty doesn't think open borders is good. He just doesn't want to mow his own lawn. He cares about himself. Whereas the real liberal men in this woman's life, the true believers, are constantly apologizing for themselves. Yuck. The way I see it, she'…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:14 PM
27

How many women communications majors does it take to do the work of one male computer science engineer?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:01 PM
-2

"I'm a huge fan of socialist medicine but..." Yeah good luck making circumcision the one exception. It's the other way around. Circumcision is the one constant. This can't be good for her mental health. I'm sure she knows the pieces don't fit together that way. How does the left reconcile its love for healthcare while opposing circumcision? With a big official government label of "unnecessary" I guess. While you're at it, figure out why vitamins and gym memberships don't count as healthcare but …
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:54 PM
11

The CDC says circumcision prevents AIDS. Now you know why feminists love the CDC so much. They are the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 06:48 PM
3

It's exactly why there will never be a men's rights movement. Men do not collectivize. They don't have the narcissism for it.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:27 PM
9

Probably calculated. People starting to question. It's the difference between mainstream media with their 24 hour news cycle, and alternative media, with long running narratives. If you watch TV news, they tell you this happened and then this happened and then... Go back to sleep America, everything is a coincidence. If you listen to alternative media, they try to connect the dots and make sense of things. Interesting to note the political bend of mainstream versus alternative.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:24 PM
0

Oh.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:19 PM
-2

The defining trait of the left is censorship, to protect ugly truths from comfortable lies, and leftwingmaleadvocates is no exception. Even this place censors. You can't even say the word "incel" without prefixing it with "nonviolent".
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:03 PM
-1

Far right. I don't agree with the compass. Something cannot be "left libertarian" or "right authoritarian". That makes no sense. If something is libertarian or authoritarian, that is the defining trait, and it will have a nature unto itself. It's like thinking you can plant ivy in your yard but keep it trimmed and contained so it doesn't go up the walls of the house. You will always be fighting it.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 05:00 PM
1

Why should a doctor's salary be protected from market competition with license laws? Don't think red meat causes diabetes? License revoked!
/r/MensRights26/03/24 04:56 PM
4

No. It's not true. Women consume something like 80% of all healthcare. It's designed for them.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 04:54 PM
-17

Get rid of NATO, like Trump said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 02:21 AM
2

Affirmative Action on circumcision.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 01:22 AM
1

America invaded Ukraine under Obama, overthrew their government. The war was supposed to happen under Hillary, but Trump won and delayed it.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 01:17 AM
12

I don't want them in "adult spaces" either.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 11:51 PM
20

Hey it's me Alexandra Botez and I just love cute chess guys! Tee hee. OMG I'm like, just soooo bad at chess I could totally use a tutor. You can like totally help me out by like watching my stream, okay? I have a totally awesome special on phone sex right now, just $9.99/minute. Open your wallets guys!
/r/MensRights25/03/24 11:49 PM
3

They try to appeal to poor women by throwing freebees at them like free birth control pills or tampons. Meanwhile Hillary Clinton and Madeleine Albright are lining the pockets of defense contractors by declaring war on Istanbul because they won't allow Malala to go to school because she's a girl, or something.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 11:03 PM
11

When supply and demand goes the other way, for example sports, government steps in to fix it. Left wing men mistakenly believe they can organize politically and get government to step in for men the same way it steps in for women. In order to believe this fantasy, the left has to dismiss any concept of elites, of elites having a concerted agenda to eliminate competition. The left talks about activism to help the oppressed, yet has to dismiss any "conspiracy theories" about those very oppressors?…
/r/MensRights25/03/24 10:58 PM
1

You'll get shadow banned for that stuff right here. Don't ask me how I know.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:53 PM
27

Feminists are usually married to men. Rich men. Historically they were the wives of the robber barons. Feminism has always been more of an elite class war than some sort of hate group. Although it obviously attracts dejected women, they are not the ones who steer it. They never benefited from doubling the labor supply.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:51 PM
4

How many times have you seen a circumcision argument where one side tries to explain what the foreskin is and how it works, and the other side says "Nuh uh. The CDC says it's safe and effective"? You can't "prove" anything. Only "trusted authorities" can do that, by issuing proclamations. Insofar as making a logical case, please do not ever cite any studies. I'm serious. You don't need them, or want them. Make it a point to never do that. Always reason, from first principles. Make the most basic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 05:41 PM
2

I think they're fixing that. Go to Home Depot's website and tell me they don't have more women than men in their ads.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 05:14 PM
1

Some people insist Hollywood is not run by *ahem* Members Of A Certain Religion (MOACR). I once saw a discussion on a movie website where two left wingers were discussing it. One insisted it wasn't true. The other stated plainly that there are more Democrats in Congress, or whatever it was at the time. He asked, is Congress not run by Democrats? The other guy was flabbergasted. He couldn't believe what he was hearing, from somebody he respected. Clearly he was what you would call "oversocialized…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 05:09 PM
25

lol Denmark is going to war. For Israel is it? You knew they would conscript women rather than stop conscripting men. The left sure loves it some war.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 01:05 AM
1

One step at a time. I think we need to go even further. LGBT is heavily invested in the system, particularly with Big Pharma, but also online censorship.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:16 AM
1

Zelensky isn't going to let you kiss the ring. Get off your knees.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:14 AM
1

Some war? Some censorship? Some lockdown for Big Pharma?
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:11 AM
1

The GOP is the left. You can't tell me Hillary is any different from Bush.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:10 AM
1

Those handouts are never for food and housing. It's always Big Pharma or something. It was radical that Trump gave people actual money for the lockdown. That will never happen again. It will only ever be vouchers for daycare or mental therapy, but never just money.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:02 AM
1

There must be a lot of people who are still afraid to admit this, because lockdown was the biggest transfer of wealth in the history of the world.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:00 AM
2

You probably don't know this, but it was the New York Times who made up the lie about WMDs in Iraq. Trump's bluster doesn't compare. In fact he's the only president who didn't start a war. In America, it's a trope to say things like "Every other country has LGBT marriage". Even decades ago before that was true. America was actually one of the first countries to allow it. But we are told we are "backward" in order to push us ahead faster. I think the same thing happens in Europe where Belgian TV …
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:58 PM
2

Did any feminist ever give a reason for opposing Sanders and supporting Clinton, besides Clinton being pro-war?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:40 PM
1

I could tell what you were going to say before you said it. It's such a familiar story, perfectly encapsulating the two sides. It's so much more than just support for policy A or B. Thanks for laying it out.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:34 PM
1

In 2008 you could read articles about how Twitter and the internet were going to improve democracy. By 2012 NPR banned their comments section and all the other news outlets followed. Since 2016 we've been under complete lockdown, and journalists are apologizing for miscalculating the damage free speech could do. I don't think the left changed. The left, being feminine, is pragmatic. Any principles they appeared to support were just a means to an end. What the left is and always has been is a col…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:25 PM
3

Republican politicians are not the right. Go to any right wing forum. Go to any conspiracy forum. They're strongly against circumcision, and the fact that circumcision is so intertwined with Big Pharma makes it easy. The left cannot very well oppose circumcision, without running afoul of scientific consensus among other things.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:16 PM
1

Wikipedia has an ad campaign right now called "Ukraine Everywhere". Can you imagine if they had "Iraq Everywhere" back when the New York Times took us to war with them with their lie about WMDs? Wikipedia would have been removed from the internet by Google and the State Department as some kind of russian disinfo. The left is the party of John McCain, a war party. That's the only thing it exists for at this point.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:09 PM
0

The Republican party was started by a railroad lobbyist named Abraham Lincoln. It has always been a big business party and the Civil Rights Act was part of that. Big Business didn't want to have two separate but equal versions of everything. That's twice as expensive. It's only the Democrats that were conquered. The used to be a populist party. Now that Progressives run the show, all they do is send us off to die in wars to make the world safe from antisemitism, like you said.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 11:05 PM
1

Yes, except I always saw it as man-hating and it always bothered me. It wasn't until later that I understood how it all fit together as a package deal. For example, a socially liberal idea like banning lead paint sounds good enough and doesn't seem connected to putting men in jail over he said she said. But I don't see it that way now. Yeah lead paint is bad, but so is teflon, and Science spent the last several decades putting teflon into everything including tap water. They don't care about you…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:53 PM
2

Example? Extreme right wing position like stop foreign aid. Send them a bill to get it back. Slightly left of that, reduce foreign aid? Gets you branded woke communist? I don't think so. You're still right wing extremist. This thing goes one way. It's what you are in relation to the establishment. They can have 100% so they don't accept 99%.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:31 PM
1

Woke is a kind of corporate takeover, a cartel that exists perpendicular to the free market. Gillette doesn't have to worry about selling razors because you're not their customer anymore. The government is. Companies "sell" to government now, in order to be allowed the privilege to operate. Small business is killed, didn't hire enough females or whatever excuse you can find. No longer matters if they make a product people want to buy. Masculine competition replace with feminine cooperation.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:25 PM
1

Start talking about "men's mental health" and pretty soon 100% of boys will be on Ritalin instead of just 30%. Psychiatry will destroy us all.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:18 PM
16

If sex changes were everything Science cracks them up to be, every man here would be transforming, at least for a day or two to try it out.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:12 PM
6

I think it's more class warfare. Historically, feminists were the wives of the robber barons. Get women in the workforce and devalue labor. It's still a movement of the affluent. Free birth control pills, tampons, and mammograms are dangled in front of poor women to try and sweeten the deal, but these are just as much for Big Pharma as for anyone else, moreso, and the real direction of the movement is far more focused on things like global government and business regulation to eliminate competit…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:10 PM
9

Police are afraid. Those women should be in jail for blackmail.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 09:55 PM
2

I'm relatively new to reddit, but it is absolutely the most censored forum I've ever been on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/24 05:31 AM
1

The problem with censorship is you don't even know what's been censored. Bans are not infrequent here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/24 05:30 AM
3

You say "peaceful incel" in the same way that George Bush says "compassionate conservative". Stop apologizing. Reddit and others have intentionally removed your outlets in hopes you will have some kind of outburst they can capitalize on politically. "See? We told you incels were no good". But they made it that way. This is a political regime at war with you. I got banned from intactivism, for who knows what. They don't want us to organize. Just stay strong, and know there are plenty of people ou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/24 05:27 AM
5

According to the left, you're supposed to call them "unhoused people" now, in order to emphasize their role as pawns to be dealt with by the masters of the universe. The reason this is important is because I don't think Left wing male advocates will get anywhere believing that attention can be drawn to men's issues in the same way it is drawn to women's issues. You can't rob Mary and give to Peter. You have to get rid of Paul.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/24 05:12 AM
5

The word "consensus" is brought to us by the "scientific community", and you're telling us they're not organized? Big Pharma is the original cartel after railroads. It's bigger than Big Oil.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:52 PM
26

Men don't want to admit to themselves they were victimized. That's not manly, and that's why all these social justice movements are invariably feminine. Keep talking about it as much as possible. You're doing fine. As far as tactics, you'll get better by understanding this. As an example of an approach that may help, find common ground first. Like for instance, Hillary Clinton gives speeches promoting circumcision. Isn't that a little bit creepy? And no feminist has anything to say about it? Man…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:46 PM
27

Nobody ever believes it's going to happen to them, no matter what issue or what risk.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:17 PM
4

You're already an anti-science anti-semite for opposing circumcision. You don't get any lower, Adolf.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:15 PM
2

This isn't like when heterosexuals wave the rainbow flag of Corporate America. Women do have skin in the game, because men are their partners. That's why they will be dismissed. And that's also why Hillary Clinton isn't dismissed for promoting circumcision. You can't look to establishment methods.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:12 PM
3

Science also promotes Fat Acceptance, and whines about those pesky fat shamers. Is this because fat people actually believe that being fat is healthy, or is this because Science is a conspiracy to protect industry as they poison us?
/r/MensRights18/10/23 06:02 PM
6

Big Tech isn't merely "skewed left". They and every other facet of institutional power are aligned in lockstep. At least that makes it easy to know you're right, without having to worry about confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 05:56 PM
2

Science is the new religion. Circumcision used to be religious. Now it is secular, a worldwide scientific consensus touted by the WHO and the CDC as one of the top achievements in human history. Oppose circumcision and you're kicked down the social status ladder for being an anti-science bigot spreading misinformation. You don't want to be labeled anti-science do you? Then you better make this blood sacrifice to Bill Nye and Neil Degrauss Tyson.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 05:01 PM
2

America didn't used to circumcised. The Progressives are the ones who started it.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:56 PM
22

I've had a sense of this too. Thanks for putting it into words. Terms like "neurodiversity" come from academia. An actual person with autism would never think of it as a "gift". Even the best of them would still recognize it as a hindrance that they've managed to work around. If autism is caused by environmental pollution of some kind, that means somebody is guilty for causing it. So what academia is trying to do is provide cover. If something caused you to have autism, then you weren't really i…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:49 PM
2

They aren't just "false". They're fraudulent. False would mean they blamed the wrong guy by accident or something, mistaken identity. These are malicious. Here are signs it's fraudulent: -It's reported to the media instead of to the police -It's reported 30 years later -It's reported as "sexual misconduct" instead of rape -The woman has no defensive wounds That last one is key, and I think it's proof that the idea of rape is so foreign to men that they don't even think to imagine what it would t…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:32 PM
2

Even at 10%, that would be more than double any other crime. Rape also has a higher rate of exoneration than any other crime.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:19 PM
4

Doctors go after women for the same reason shoe salesman goes after women. They're the ones spending all the money. Something like 80% of healthcare is consumed by women. Be thankful you're not being patronized. Healthcare hasn't made anyone healthy.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:16 PM
1

Feminism is pro-circumcision. Just go down the list at the CDC and the WHO. In America, there was a brief attempt to ban circumcision in San Francisco. I think every politician within a hundred miles condemned it. I'm not sure if you actually need politicians specifically. It might be better to list the most prominent people, and the most egregious statements. Bill Gate's wife. Lots of celebrities condemning FGM then promoting MGM. Etc...
/r/MensRights29/06/23 09:06 AM
10

Where did this "neuro-diversity advocate" stuff come from? People want to say having autism is equal to not having autism, so no one is to blame.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 07:51 AM
6

I have a hard time understanding how "left wing male advocates" can be left wing and not recognize that large institutional power and centralized authority is feminism's greatest ally. Feminism is the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 04:35 AM
3

They did what women asked them to do. This is why women aren't attracted to them anymore and they end up incel.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:55 PM
6

Nobody is more sensitive. Women have just been given more opportunity to abuse. They're lying about "feeling unsafe". The term "unsafe" alone makes it obvious. If a murderer chased you down the street, you don't say "I felt unsafe".
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:31 PM
2

Moderation bots suck because moderation sucks. Bots are much better at it than people though, because they are impersonal.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:28 PM
4

Conservatives recognize men and women are different. Liberals do too, they just lie about it. But they still end up measuring women by the standards of men, where women come up short, and then view women as in need of help, and consequently having low expectations for women. Liberals are very condescending, to everyone.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:25 PM
11

I suspect it's not true, and that the girl telling the story has psychological problems where she has to find ways of making herself a victim in order to have something to rebel against, because there isn't anything for her to really rebel against. Let's say it's true though. A woman in the Navy was raped and had no recourse. Whereas some other woman, a very privileged woman, makes up a story that Donald Trump raped her. She waits 30 years to say anything, so that she doesn't have to prove anyth…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 09:30 AM
14

Don't teach your son not to rape. I mean that symbolically. You can't view your son as an oppressor. You can't make believe that he will suffer mental anguish from toxic masculinity unless he is feminized. You have to go against authority and understand there is a completely different dynamic than what they are feeding you. They are trying to destroy men, their potential competition. Your future son, instead of any of that stuff, will be struggling to find outlets where he is allowed to be male.…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 09:20 AM
10

Thanks for coming here to bridge the gap. You sound thoughtful. I'd like to respond to number 3. ​ Gallop runs polls on public opinion and sometimes they track changes over time. One example that stands out is whether or not people think racism is a major issue. They did one about 20 years ago and found that only about 1/3 of Democrats thought so. The numbers for Republicans and Independents were much lower. This wasn't that long ago. Fast forward to today and the number is around 3/4 for Democr…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 09:05 AM
8

It's a war against testosterone, because elites want us docile. The idea that feminism is some kind of rebellion against patriarchy is absurd because women are basically just rule enforcers. They want to domesticate men. This is the most feminine society that has ever existed.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:27 AM
-2

No, only one is real. It's xenoestrogen. Industrial waste is estrogenic. Our society is artificially feminine.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 02:13 AM
22

Add "Toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights26/06/23 11:58 PM
2

Men's Rights moderators also banned them. Do you think any feminist group says "No feminazis allowed"?
/r/MensRights26/06/23 11:39 PM
3

Women are much better customers for Big Pharma. That's why.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 11:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter