TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Whitified Archive

View 19 posts and 1,725 comments by Whitified on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
331

DiscriminationWhitified/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:36 AM
39

Whitified/r/MGTOW01/11/16 02:35 AM
17

Whitified/r/RPChristians11/01/18 06:18 PM
16

Whitified/r/TheRedPill22/05/16 12:40 PM
10

Whitified/r/RPChristians10/02/18 05:10 PM
9

Whitified/r/RPChristians24/12/17 10:11 PM
9

Whitified/r/RPChristians11/09/17 11:22 AM
5

DISCUSSIONWhitified/r/RedPillWomen13/03/16 08:46 PM
5

Whitified/r/RPChristians02/07/18 07:33 PM
5

Whitified/r/askTRP22/05/16 12:50 PM
5

Whitified/r/RPChristians04/02/18 02:33 PM
4

Whitified/r/RPChristians26/05/18 10:54 PM
3

Whitified/r/askTRP17/11/16 07:20 PM
2

Whitified/r/askTRP19/08/16 09:00 PM
1

Whitified/r/RPChristians27/04/18 11:18 AM
1

Whitified/r/RedPillWomen03/12/15 08:24 PM
1

Whitified/r/MGTOW06/10/16 11:18 AM
1

Whitified/r/askTRP29/09/16 07:46 PM
0

Whitified/r/MensRights18/03/16 11:49 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,725 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The difference is we can prove it
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:18 AM
14

The Internet doesn't hate men You suck Really cant make this up
/r/MensRights05/10/24 08:47 PM
1

Ahh, ad hominems now? Is that how you present yourself? ;)
/r/MensRights04/10/24 09:55 AM
6

Really? Any mother would kill after losing custody?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 09:20 PM
7

Perverting justice like that will just give feminists more excuses, ohh but they didn't charge women with murder therefore lighter sentences therefore Patriarchy
/r/MensRights03/10/24 09:16 PM
21

40 years behind bars, followed by a 10-year supervised release So... a minimum 10 year sentence?
/r/MensRights03/10/24 09:13 PM
1

You do own your children, well until they're 18 at least. Terrible comparison. Video's example is marriage, now that's where men truly own nothing and have everything to lose. How does having a "purpose" here (whatever that means) change anything?
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:15 PM
14

Not to mention the domestic violence system can be easily used against men too to gain an advantage over him during divorce, regardless of income level.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 08:13 AM
4

Did I ask you if God is faithful? Why are you telling me that? Why are you ignoring my other questions? What does the above have anything to do with men and ownership? EDIT: God is not supposed to do anything. God will be faithful Lmao great job contradicting yourself too, so which is it?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:18 PM
4

The premise of the video isn't fame, it's ownership. Without ownership, why would men care? Are you asking men to care anyway, despite not owning anything? Is that what God is supposed to do to a man's life?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 11:03 PM
3

But it God exists there is a moral law giver, and if that God is Christ then there is good and evil and God will enact Justice when the time comes and we can be sure in the hope of enteral life after death. So.... yes? No more like Make up your mind
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:58 PM
42

Such a simple concept, of course men don't give a fuck when there are no incentives. But people will disagree, because reasons
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:43 PM
11

Does having Christ suddenly make men want to contribute to society despite owning nothing?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:39 PM
9

You want men to live/die for a purpose without owning anything...? I mean, it is possible... if you trick them.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:35 PM
-2

"Muh optics"
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:32 PM
15

If It's not programmed to be misandrist, it might start telling the truth. Can't have that now can we?
/r/MensRights29/09/24 02:50 PM
-3

Do you honestly not know that the vast majority of pro life people believe there is a point that the bundle of cells has developed enough that elective abortion should not be legal? And why are you telling me what the pro-life camp believe? How about we assume less about strangers on the internet, and just talk about what the other redditor is willing to share? I go with when the fetus begins to respond to stimuli. That's around 20 weeks. That's not Pro-Choice, that's Pro-before-20-weeks-Choice
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:18 PM
3

That's one way to avoid questions. Politicians should be quoting this.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:01 PM
-3

You're Pro-most-of-the-time-Choice then?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:00 PM
-3

Is it her choice or not?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:35 PM
-4

There are pro-choice people, there are pro-life people. You see those guys going "ohhhh im pro-choice but this is murder!" They clearly have a... special understand of murder, but it's not clear what exactly it is. I'm asking them to find out.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:17 PM
-1

Obviously I'm not talking about the law otherwise all abortions are legal and therefore not murder. I'm asking you guys who believe some abortions are murder and some aren't, what you guys believe murder is or ought to be.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:11 PM
-4

....then and only then, it's murder?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:00 PM
6

How 'bout ignoring questions, and you?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:58 PM
4

Well I can't help but cherry pick when my question of "what is murder" is answered by "just listen to the doctors" Do doctors decide what murder is?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:49 PM
8

Is it the tone you don't like, or the questions themselves? Or would you prefer nobody question anything?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:47 PM
8

Why does a simple question make you so mad?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:46 PM
9

For asking questions?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:34 PM
5

No doctors shouldn't have their politics play in this. Oh, you realized? Then how do we "just listen to the doctors"?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:28 PM
6

Ok. Why? at 8-9 months Specfically, why only then?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:26 PM
-5

So which is it? Is it always her choice? Or not her choice when it's "fully developed"? It's a simple question.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:24 PM
6

Really! Wow. Do doctors declare their political beliefs on the clinic? How exactly do we know which doctors are pro-choice, pro-life or somewhere in between? I'm sure this is all very simple, right?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:22 PM
-16

several days or weeks Is it only her choice then when it's several days/weeks old? Why even mention this? What about those in between?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:18 PM
3

And then you have those guys who think they can sit on the fence lol. Let's see if they can defend their beliefs
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:13 PM
-2

Doesn't answer the question though. Is it murder once it's "unsafe"? It is murder once the baby starts growing organs? Or once the baby has fully formed organs? Or once the baby grows proper consciousness? Specifically, after which point is it murder?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:11 PM
-28

I'm pro choice If it's her choice, why can't she choose to terminate the pregnancy at 9 months?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:52 PM
0

After which point, specifically, is it murder then? "Absolutely" murder as opposed to what? "Slightly" murder?
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:44 PM
27

The amount of excuses men go to to excuse women from their own rules they impose on others is frankly astounding
/r/MensRights16/09/24 09:37 AM
-1

...You think men wear fragrance so that women will touch them?
/r/MensRights16/09/24 09:36 AM
7

"This is fine" house burns
/r/MensRights15/09/24 08:17 PM
11

Are they showing dicks to humanize men?
/r/MensRights15/09/24 07:55 PM
1

I'm making the logical connection to why men are being mistreated, rather than making a blanket statement that it's natural for men to be mistreated. If it's evolutionary instinct to mistreat men, it's natural to mistreat men. Is it evolutionary instinct to mistreat men? Let alone what the definition of "natural" even means It's not natural for everyone to be against men If you don't know what "natural" means, how do you know it's not natural for everyone to be against men?
/r/MensRights15/09/24 03:15 PM
4

It's not natural for everyone to be against men Oh? Even though it's natural for male suffering to be ignored? therefore everyone see men as being more responsible for their environment (situations), rather than seeing them as victims. Even though women blame men all the time? Yes, women don't help this issue of placing blame on men, even with proof to the contrary, Even though men blame men all the time? but men have contributed to this single issue since the dawn of human civilisation Even tho…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 02:17 PM
4

we are victims of our own evolutionary constructs not fall into the trap of "everyone is against us" If it's natural for everyone to be against men, why aren't men allowed to think everyone is against them?
/r/MensRights15/09/24 09:53 AM
10

Yes, let's blame men for blaming men too, cos why not
/r/MensRights14/09/24 03:08 PM
13

Not really, denial is just step 1. Step 2 is to blame men for mens' suffering.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 02:51 PM
4

If we're going to be pedantic and miss the point, I believe they meditate 10 hours a day.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:28 PM
8

Thousands of years of monastic traditions around the world prove your statement false
/r/MensRights13/09/24 02:12 PM
14

"I was forced to have sex!" "I was forced to sign!" "I was forced to make a porno!" You guys really think you can outsmart the State? With a form and a camera? LOL
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:20 AM
2

only smart comment here
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:33 AM
0

I wish it were that simple. That would imply sane individuals can achieve just as much with the same effort. That would imply there is no institutional support nor funds invested into shaping the narrative. But wikipedia is viewed by billions, you tell me how likely it is the Left didn't invest a single cent there?
/r/MensRights21/08/24 05:40 PM
13

You can't win. Wikipedia has way more "leftists" with way more time on their hands, they edit and outvote you in literally billions of articles this shit covers way more topics than just mens' rights, they're also in religion, food, history, cultures, etc. Yes, I said "leftists" in inverted commas because i suspect they're just paid employees from third world countries given how much time and resources they have
/r/MensRights21/08/24 11:45 AM
9

Because when society stops working they can and will blame it on men anyway
/r/MensRights13/08/24 04:12 PM
16

This doesn't mean shit if false accusers don't get legal consequences
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:09 PM
15

See guys? "Communication issues" is just code for "learn to see things our way". The idea of a man having different opinions, much less feelings, is completely foreign to them.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:09 PM
2

Women view men as automatons. If an automaton speaks out against mankind you wouldn't take it's opinions seriously, would you? No. It's malfunctioning, and it needs to be repaired by a human... or it will have to be eliminated.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:42 AM
2

I mean, we can't argue against that because you deliberately failed to specify what it is you supposedly found so dumb.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:32 AM
109

Just another day of privilege living under the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 10:27 AM
1

Really? They teach you this now unironically?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:41 AM
1

A spokesperson for the Sunak leadership campaign said: "The only thing that should matter in recruitment is the content of your character, not your sex or the colour of your skin. "That the Ministry of Defence would allow Britain's security to potentially be put at risk by a drive for so-called 'diversity' is not only disgraceful, it is dangerous." Now watch the conservatives suddenly fix the sinking ship, temporarily, papering over the cracks, so it can sink again on a later day.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:52 PM
2

You do notice that all those upvotes in your post are the everyday women that interact with men on a daily basis, right?
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:15 PM
2

Really? Is this the new feminist school of thought?
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:12 PM
99

Notice in UK, things are so bad that feminists don't even pretend to be equal anymore. You don't see them going "Oh, of course violence against men and boys is bad too. But..." It's just straight up "women and girls" only. No ifs or buts.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:06 PM
1

Virtue signaling Women throughout human... have used men as a group and those who disagreed where not shy to pick up the spoils that came with this "war". He made his position very clear. He thinks this is virtue signalling and that women are never truly on your side. What do you not understand?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:39 PM
5

More importantly, only women can talk about men's rights publicly without risk of cancelling. Only women can raise awareness to cancel feminist funding without being labelled a hate movement.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 12:36 PM
1

Well its different in that it recognizes men's suffering as a problem by itself Even extremist feminists will admit that. They just blame it on "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights16/08/22 01:55 AM
4

Notice how mainstream journalists now acknowledge hypergamy, if the goal is ultimately to deflect blame away from women/feminism unto men.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:28 PM
6

Exactly, she's still blaming men. So nothing changes.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:26 PM
5

I don't know man, it's still blaming mens' supposed failures and frustrations for all the ills of society, instead of feminism. How is this narrative any different from the "moderate" feminists and tradcons?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:24 PM
5

I wrote ONE SENTANCE out of all of this that said I support women's rights. The rest was talking about how shit feminism is. And so many of you have the audacity to say I don't care about men's rights or that I'm somehow against men. No one's saying that. We're showing you your opinions ("I support women's rights.") are wrong. We are helping men now by guiding you. What more do you want?
/r/MensRights15/08/22 05:14 PM
1

Women don't dominate workplace deaths too. Any plans?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:34 AM
2

All possible efforts will be made to increase participation of Aryan race participants over Jewish ones. It doesn't say Aryans will be chosen over Jews if they lack qualifications! That would be discrimination.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:33 AM
6

Even Cartoon Network lecture kids on feminism now.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:28 AM
2

Isn't there like "1st degree murder" and "2nd/3rd degree murder" BS that gives the jury discretion to enforce their prejudices
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:25 AM
2

her privilege as a wealthy white woman Interesting. Does a white woman or a black man has more "privilege" in Modern America Hierarchy? Or does it change on an ad hoc basis?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:23 AM
1

all disgusting comments, and the people who say those things should be held accountable. And how exactly do you think they should be held "accountable"?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:17 AM
3

Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the concept of democracy and representative republic for the people of Korea, regardless of personal beliefs. Both legally and socially. We have a long way to go for both communists and capitalists. But North Korea isn't about raising communists above capitalists. It's about making it level, and doing this includes things that benifit communists and capitalists.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:13 AM
7

is mocking feminism misogyny? Feminists say it is. So why are they mocking mens rights?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:08 AM
20

Men are boycotting marriage in increasing numbers now. #MeToo has proven to single men that even they are not safe. Boycotting female interaction is the natural next step. It may not happen as soon as we like, but like men boycotting marriage it will happen gradually and inevitably. No one escapes cause and effect lol
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:05 AM
21

Why? Don't feminists say they want equality? Why are equal rights not their focus all of a sudden once its mens' rights?
/r/MensRights11/08/22 12:06 PM
1

Some will, but aggressive behaviour usually elicits an aggressive response. Exactly, therefore passive-aggressive behaviour should elicit a passive-agressive response too, right? She has no reason to take offense, blow her top or start calling you misogynist, right? That will be an "overt" response. So if she returns passive-aggressiveness with outright aggressiveness, something you claim is not womens' default mode of communication, then what else could it be but proof that covert and passive a…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 08:21 PM
2

Just that not all of them are like that. How do you know this? If indeed all women communicate "covertly" and passive aggressively, but only some are spiteful and others not, then shouldn't these non-spiteful women respond to your passive-aggressiveness calmly without getting angry? They won't be happy, that's fine, but why would they be angry? If indeed this is how they communicate like you said, why would they be angry that you, a man, is communicating like them now? Don't just repeat what you…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 07:59 PM
2

You don't have to dismiss my idea so quickly. It can easily be tested: Just be passive aggressive back at women. It's that easy! Does she: 1) Suddenly communicate better with you, for you are now speaking her language? OR 2) Get angry at you, for you figured out her game and is now using it back at her? Surely, if what you say about "most" women simply being ignorant/stupid/covert and not deliberately spiteful/malicious, then 1) should happen, right? But does 1) or 2) sound more likely to happen…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 07:07 PM
8

What if she is so "covert" precisely because she knows you can't handle it and will make you miserable? You know, aka spite?
/r/MensRights10/08/22 06:49 PM
3

Good good... push men away more please... very nice
/r/MensRights10/08/22 06:22 PM
2

Then they won't be able to oppress men. Then what's the point?
/r/MensRights10/08/22 06:20 PM
5

It's not that all women are spiteful and will make you miserable unless you keep them happy more that addressing what makes a woman unhappy, before she becomes unhappy and passive-aggressive What is even the difference?
/r/MensRights10/08/22 06:11 PM
1

Feminism is the belief that men are to blame
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:34 PM
22

Feminists will tell you its not ok and they "disagree" with it but then will do nothing about it
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:31 PM
1

A few theories have been proposed over the years: 1) in-group preference 2) Because women are incredibly similar, and so subconsciously realize that what's true for one must be true for her 3) Because women are incredibly bland, and so her gender is her only or most dominant identity 4) Because women realize they are aristocracy in this society, and so feels incredible disdain for peasants (men) who dares talk to royalty without proper decorum
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:23 PM
7

"Because you will believe her?"
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:48 PM
26

Just another day of privilege living in the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:47 PM
9

I'm not in the same room as you u fucking weirdo
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:54 PM
7

How about United Nations?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:52 PM
10

feminists
/r/MensRights08/08/22 06:25 PM
5

Men work in fossil fuel factories! Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights08/08/22 06:24 PM
7

Yes, white men caused deforestation!
/r/MensRights08/08/22 06:24 PM
2

Because when men gather they inform each other how women are manipulating them. Women don't want that because they want to manipulate men.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:18 PM
12

Ahh yes, here comes the men/victim blaming.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:13 PM
5

Yeah but "best interests of child!" and suddenly equality goes out the window
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:12 PM
1

What exactly do you want us to consider here?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:02 PM
1

Has your good optics got you anywhere with feminists?
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:12 AM
5

She's masquandering as a tradcon women though, so it's important to inform tradcon men that they're are still being conned
/r/MensRights03/08/22 06:12 AM
1

Muh optics
/r/MensRights02/08/22 04:16 PM
4

I mean, if you wanna say there is that one hypothetical tribal woman stuck in the Amazon forest somewhere who still lives a life free from feminism, and therefore we better not befoul womens' good name, then yeah technically you will be right. Doesn't make my above statement any less true.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 04:14 PM
5

You can't ignore the fact that feminism is responsible for this belief and that all women are infected by it to different extents.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 03:03 PM
3

Feminism is the belief that men are to blame. Whatever bad things happen to her, whatever bad feeelings she might have, you are to blame because you are the nearest target.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:35 PM
15

I heard Hollywood now has a "hit-in-the-balls" quota for certain movies...
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:42 PM
19

Its worse, people aren't just "fine" with it. OP's point is that people get pleasure and catharsis from watching men suffer: When the men died, it was in a gruesome and grotesque way, shown on screen for your viewing pleasure. Yes, it's this fucked up.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:39 PM
1

??? At least pretend to read what I asked...
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:44 AM
1

Yep, both blame men for everything
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:47 AM
1

Feminists will accuse you of sexism for breathing. Should we stop breathing then? Besides, aren't you the one accusing us of sexism? You want to counter sexism with sexism?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:44 AM
10

Having male-exclusive space out of practicality is sexism now? Why so eager to accuse men of sexism?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 10:17 PM
0

Why? You think evidence plays a part in feminist opinion? More importantly, do you really think you can silence every angry comment from men hurt by society?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 10:14 PM
9

They're gonna think that regardless
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:39 PM
9

Wow look this guy is so tough
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:37 PM
10

Ahh yes, let sexism continue and do nothing. That will work.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:35 PM
1

Exactly. So how can you say this is a local affair with no relation to idealogy?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:08 PM
1

By your logic, does that mean this UK problem has no relation to the US and won't affect American men in any way?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:58 PM
3

I for one love social media so now these vipers have a space to spew their venom for all to see. Men who marry them have no excuse.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:22 AM
2

So what the fuck is your point?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:15 AM
5

Exactly! Be nice to women, and they'll give you your rights!
/r/MensRights27/07/22 08:44 PM
13

No this sub don't literally hate women. I'm not part of this sub, but I have taken a look more than once, to see what it's all about. Their purpose is to work against the hatred of men that they see on feminist subs. Perhaps if the feminists on those subs who say hateful things against men and those who upvote them would just stop, there would be no need for this sub in question to exist.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 08:34 PM
54

Just another day of privilege in the Patriarchy
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:29 AM
12

Control English media, control English speakers.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:26 AM
1

The ex wife has constantly been droning on about how 'Children and their mothers have the most unbreakable bond'. Does this sound okay to you then? Is this something normal or healthy mothers should be doing?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:13 AM
1

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/ before he retired
/r/MensRights26/07/22 09:17 PM
6

Have Americans finally decided what this legendary incel looks like? Everyone seems to have their own version.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:33 PM
1

as a person who can see the big picture I just see a kid that I feel for So which is it? Can you see the big picture of how the mother tried and failed to poison her daughter's relationship with her father? Or is the kid all you can see, because feeeelings?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:15 PM
14

it doesn't do anything to help women be represented Exactly, they're saying this isn't feminist enough. OP somehow read it as a step too far.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 03:59 PM
3

The ex wife has constantly been droning on about how 'Children and their mothers have the most unbreakable bond'. You do realize we're simply celebrating the sweet karma this woman is having for trying to poison and belittle her daughter's relationship with her father, right...? Which btw, is exactly the belief that's causing the law and the courts to favor mothers over fathers in divorce preceedings (and even other legal proceedings...) And you completely did not notice this, because you know, …
/r/MensRights26/07/22 08:30 AM
1

??? Huh???? We're discussing why men have to all the dancing in dating if we are equal in society. Why are you telling us how to get women, and then your dating conquests, and then now you're talking bout MGTOW?
/r/MensRights26/07/22 08:16 AM
0

Toxic masculinity made people hate mens rights! :(
/r/MensRights24/07/22 09:24 PM
25

FDS still aint banned
/r/MensRights24/07/22 09:22 PM
3

ok and...?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 06:02 PM
1

It's for that reason that it seems clear to me that r/mensrights isn't concerned with a serious social justice movements that aims to establish men's rights (because then we'd have to admit that the traditional masculine hegemony is more in our way than feminists are) So which it? Are MRAs the masculine version of feminists? Or are MRAs victim complex seekers without serious social justice concerns, unlike feminists?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:59 PM
1

You're basically the masculine version of a feminist. But you agree with feminists, don't you? Since we're the masculine version, why don't you agree with us?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:57 PM
2

Let me guess, you're a feminist because you didn't even realize our mutual disdain is for feminists, not women. Therefore you've bought the hilarious mainstream position that redpillers somehow want to date more women, yet also hate them.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:25 AM
12

Isn't it more to describe how women are pampered and privileged in chivalrous Western society, so an angry woman can almost get away with murder, therefore don't make them angry?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:20 AM
5

/u/whereprogressismade is pretending OP is complaining about being unattractive. He still hasn't realized everything he described is still a mating ritual.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:13 AM
3

What's the difference? You're still dancing and waiting for the woman to respond.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:10 AM
1

I like China. I love Chiiina. I just sold an apartment for 15 million dollars, to somebody from China. Am I supposed to dislike them?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:50 AM
1

I thought Patriarchy and misoygny is what makes men suffer too?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:45 AM
1

Perhaps the above 2,000 combined word salad makes sense to you, but to other English speakers it sounds like English is not your first language. Take this one sentence for example. No you don't get to tell me to leave it to MRAs to decide when your idea of an MRA is the fringe minority and mine is the rational majority's view. What does this even mean? I don't get to tell you to let MRAs decide... if my idea of MRA is fringe, and yours is majority and rational...?! So you're saying I don't decid…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:42 AM
1

MRA is not out to achieve the reversal of equal rights it's out to hold that standard on everyone truly equally You know you're technically not wrong, you are at least half right, until... imaginary concepts ? Patriarchy exists Remind us again how you're supposedly not a feminist? How about you let the MRAs decide what MRA is about? Emotional tirade aside, you and I have now both made clear what our respective beliefs are. Where's the supposed "tribalism" here?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:45 PM
1

Or are you telling me there was a time when feminism supposedly achieved equality for women, but then went overboard? So yeah, you do think there was a time when feminism supposedly was about equality for women, you just think they went overboard. You wouldn't list all the above tyrannical actions of feminists as "good" if you didn't think they contributed to equality. You could have told me your beliefs 2 comments ago and saved yourself a lot of anger. Well, just so happens that MRAs do not bel…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 07:18 AM
2

so why are mra's so angry that feminists haven't fixed all of men's problems? Because feminists claim to be for equality? And have the resources to do it? Nope, wasn't me, I never said that Ok, but feminists claim to support female draft. Even if you won't admit it. The contradictions doesn't change: If they support it, shouldn't they do something about it? Or should feminists only say they support equality on paper, but do nothing about it?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:30 PM
1

I'm not sure if feminists ever made the claim that other groups are redundant. (No doubt some did, but other feminists can play dumb) What all feminists did do, is claim to be for equality, therefore anyone who disagrees with them is a sexist. So this the part we make the feminist choose. Most feminists will admit that men today lack certain rights. (They blame it on "Patriarchy") So is feminism interested in giving men their rights? If yes, why ask MRAs to do it? If no, how can you claim to be …
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:22 PM
2

How many women's issues have mra's fixed? I'm guessing zero, MRAs fixed zero mens issues too. You can't accuse us of sexism. This is an issue that is negatively affecting men, surely the men's rights movement should be working to fix it Didn't you say feminists support female draft? If they support it, shouldn't they do something about it? Or do you think feminists should only say they support female draft on paper, but do nothing about it?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 09:00 PM
2

Feminists teabagging to gloat their superiority is not necessarily a bad thing, this is how men wake up.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:50 PM
2

If a father educates his son, isn't that Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:43 PM
2

/u/pumpkinpeopleunite isn't wrong when she say it is conservatives that are preventing female draft. The problem is that feminists aren't doing anything about THAT either.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:34 PM
2

Is she? Or is she simply saying they’re crazy and she’s against them? Is that all she said? Did she not also encourage men to be chivalrous, despite knowing there are crazy feminists out there looking for trouble? FWIW, as a woman, I love when a man holds a door open for me whether on a date or not! It’s sweet! I say thank you! Please don’t buy in to this garbage, the women who get offended by this do not represent all of us. Ugh. This is why we can’t have nice things. The irresponsibility here …
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:16 PM
2

yeah...
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:53 PM
0

You agree with that, where your neurons won't connect is that that applies to these caricatures you have of certain groups you don't like and have written off . Ok. So what is this good feminism supposedly did for society you spoke of? You were on to something, first about accountability (??) and then about responsibility (???) but then when I pressed for details you wouldn't explain. Twice now. I don't know why.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:52 PM
2

Yeah but India is sooo misogynistic you know?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:26 PM
3

Whoever turned marriage into the current contract hell are the ones who deserve hell
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:25 PM
12

Good luck arguing that to an Indian court
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:24 PM
1

How about my first example that we actually did skip past . If not for the feminist movement demanding voting rights, which women didn't want as it meant the draft and bucket duty, women wouldn't be equal citizens in your country which means you couldn't complain and demonize them for not behaving responsibly because they would have no responsibility. So you're saying that before feminism gave women the vote, no one held women responsible for anything? What exactly did society not hold women res…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:14 PM
2

Yet she's feeding more clueless men into these harpies. Which is worse: 1) The enemy who hates and seeks to destroy you or 2) the friend who pretends to be on your side, but pushes you to your own demise for her own pleasure?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:05 PM
1

ok... so what is this supposed good that feminism has done for society? I thought you were on to something about feminism introducing accountability, but then you backpedaled on that. Or is this supposed good feminism has done for society simply the unequal rights and privileges feminism has given women?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:08 AM
2

Since she know there are crazy women out there who make us all can't have nice things, how can she still endorse chivalrous behaviour?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:04 AM
2

Then why can't MRAs raise awareness via social media instead? Or do you prefer we use less effective means?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:03 AM
2

They got their message out there by holding public meetings, distributing pamphlets, knocking on doors, lobbying etc etc. You have heard of social media, right?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:21 PM
9

ahh yes, agree and amplify
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:07 PM
0

...You're saying that before feminism no one held women accountable for their actions?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:06 PM
2

Are you advocating for MRA's to not bother trying? ??? You're the one demanding MRAs stop complaining. I, and all the MRAs here, happen to think complaining is the way to succeed. That's how feminists got to where they are. It's not like the suffragettes did anything else but complain. But perhaps you have a better plan? are you arguing that feminists are oppressing men? Yes. Still wanna pretend you're MRA too?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:58 PM
2

There's nothing we can do, aka oppression
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:47 PM
4

Why? So feminists can continue oppressing men under the guise of equality without being called out? Why so eager to silence us?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:42 PM
3

And...? What does that have to do with men supposedly creating selective service or not?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:29 PM
8

Maybe because we don't have the law, nor social media, nor Hollywood, nor United Nations, nor big tech, nor the entire cancel culture movement, nor billions of dollars of funding on our side?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:24 PM
13

I’m not blaming anyone Who created the selective service….mostly men… So which is it? Are men to blame for creating selective service or not? I’m just confused why you want feminists to fix everything for y’all Maybe because they said they want equality?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 06:28 PM
10

We're discussing feminism. Why do you feel the need to blame men and defend women?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 06:21 PM
19

I guess Patriarchy is somehow to blame for this too
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:46 PM
1

Men should be a gentleman no matter what not spend time wasting their gentleman character and behaviors on women who simply don’t want it So which is it? Should men be chivalrous no matter what? Or should men be chivalrous only to some? I am not responsible for other people’s actions and decisions and only my own What about your decision to endorse chivalry in 2022? If anything bad happens to the clueless men who heed your advice, how can you refuse to be responsible for it?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:24 PM
1

What is a "show cause hearing", did you ask for one or did the prosecution/the bitch put you to one? Anyways, you have a court ruling so that beats everything. I want to know about folks expelled but had no legal ruling whatsoever.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:26 AM
11

I am not a lawyer and not drafting laws Then why insist false accusers have a different list, separate from the sex offenders' list? People who falsely accuse people - should be put on some kind of list. A list which is publicly available like the sex offender list
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:18 AM
11

Because she did not commit "a crime to knowingly cause another person to engage in an unwanted sexual act by force or threat". By that logic, why is flashing a sex offense?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:04 AM
29

You seem to be under the assumption that Karens' brains can operate logically like that of a flowchart.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:00 AM
4

While its great you are complimenting men, complimenting them for being gentlemen has got to be the stupidest, most irresponsible thing you can do, because now that shmuck will continue being chivalrous to other women and inevitably some feminists who will call his chivalry misogynist and get him in trouble. Are you going to be responsible for that?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:56 AM
15

How is it not a sex offense?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 08:49 AM
5

Just ignore women. They can't accuse you if you don't say or do anything
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:24 AM
3

"Feminism wreaks havoc, women most hurt!"
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:18 AM
0

Feminism and any other philosophy that once did undeniable good or was imperative for human advancement You tell us not to adopt their language, yet you adopt their concepts. Which is worse?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:16 AM
5

My rule is I open the door in Asia and ignore women in US/Europe.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:13 AM
1

Very irresponsible of you to ask men on the internet continue to risk their reputation because you find something "sweet"
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:11 AM
1

Exactly, it causes hurricanes and earthquakes too im telling you!
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:47 AM
1

She/He meant to say "same gender preference", but saying that will further fuck up his/her mind to a degree he/she isn't ready for yet. So for now he/she say "camaraderie".
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:40 AM
302

It's the toxic masculinity im telling you!
/r/MensRights20/07/22 04:21 AM
1

Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order (2019) is a game about a lone, surviving Jedi young man, who has to survive in a world after Order 66. Coincidentally, this young man is also a white man. What a coincidence ;)
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:04 AM
3

She's not your friend.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:36 AM
7

Oh, like femcels?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:51 PM
3

They are all straight but have zero dating history, Where are these women you speak of with apparently zero dating history?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 01:43 PM
5

Yeah this being India, don't hold your breath
/r/MensRights18/07/22 11:13 AM
3

And the angrier you are, the more they accuse you of toxic masculinity! Win-win!
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:08 AM
7

What is "judicial custody"? Is that jail, will she really be charged with anything?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:05 AM
5

We should allow satire to mock concern trolls. Its the only way to fight back.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:02 AM
2

Why? So she can continue her concern trolling without being called out?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:00 AM
1

You don't think they'll implement it?
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:03 AM
2

Ahhh so that's why I always somehow knew the generation stereotypes are bad. So that's why progressives and feminists are behind it. It would divide people and prevent age gaps.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 07:54 AM
1

The point here is that OP is teaching from experience, while you and /u/AttentionDenail are pretending this is science. But please go ahead. At least I don't have to get killed by stupidity.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/22 07:44 AM
2

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/19/traditional-conservative-or-feminist/
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:58 PM
6

They're allies with feminists in more aspects.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:23 PM
1

What does the MRM get wrong? Why?
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:19 PM
2

“They” don’t do it “all the time”, it’s an occasional gender role low effort joke Wanna know what gave you away?
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:31 AM
5

Not really actually, but feminists say it is. So we hold them to their standards which they enforce on others.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:30 AM
0

"Stop noticing things!" -/u/fogoticus
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:29 AM
1

try destroy our reputation men do it too. Really? Are you also going to tell me that people believe these men like they believe women too? is it worse than getting murdered by their spouse/exes? which in every official country statistic say it's very disproportional toward women. Ohh, so now you telling us that DV is committed by men far more than women? Remind us again how you're not a feminist?
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:32 AM
6

try destroy our reputation You say that so casually like its nothing. Also noteworthy that you ignore scorned women who take your stuff with the power of the State. You sure you don't believe Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:59 PM
19

Let me guess, Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 08:55 AM
17

Feminists will blame patriarchy for this anyway
/r/MensRights24/05/22 08:49 AM
-1

But you can't deny they get off from it
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:59 PM
3

womens' affirmation
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:57 PM
37

This is great. Feminists are throwing Amber Heard under the bus now to save #MeToo If feminists stand with Amber then the hypocrisy of #MeToo becomes obvious, and the movement will be well and truly over. Pray they are this stupid. We should encourage this!
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:46 AM
0

Then how is it hurting REAL victims of domestic violence? I answered your question. Where?
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:40 AM
0

Then why bother responding? If you're gonna run like a coward at the first critical question, why even pretend to dialogue?
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:26 AM
0

but it helps male ones Then how is it hurting REAL victims of domestic violence?
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:23 AM
2

Yep. Feminism is the belief that men are to blame.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:12 AM
1

k
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:09 AM
0

she's giving more credit to men who have been domestically abused taking away credit from women who have been domestically abused Then say it. She's hurting REAL victims of domestic violence aka women. Say it.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:04 AM
33

Feminists will blame men for liking macho stuff.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:35 PM
1

They are pretending feminists have no obligation to fight for mens' rights after claiming to be for "equal rights". Don't fall for the trap.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:33 AM
1

Of course not. But conservatives will heroicly want to rescue them anyway.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:26 PM
8

Said /u/teenagewitch97 calmly as she proceeds to ignore whitified's arguments
/r/MensRights20/05/22 12:25 PM
18

I used to work for the Manhattan District Attorney. I can tell you, very matter of factly, the criminal justice system is fucked up. Domestic violence victims having their lives uprooted because cases were pled down to a violation of harassment, rape cases in which the defendant was exonerated, etc. I would be interested in knowing all the details of the case for this particular situation. DA’s decline to prosecute all the time unless they know there’s at least a chance of them winning the case.…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:03 AM
6

Why can't misogyny/misandry be the fundamental flaw? He's contradicting himself lmao
/r/MensRights20/05/22 09:00 AM
4

Watch them blame Patriarchy for it.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:12 AM
3

conservatives will suddenly get outraged and ensure this never happens
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:03 AM
74

Yes hit men in the wallet more. Let's see how that plays out.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:02 AM
0

Nuclear family destroyed Patriarchy because women marrying into your family no longer have to obey your parents, only you. Husbands are then "taken care of" by Domestic Violence and Divorce laws. BAM, now she controls the family.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 09:02 AM
4

You can comment on it. Do you not have objective standards? Is hate speech suddenly ok because men commit crimes?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:49 AM
3

And...? Does this excuse feminists being a hate group? Does this excuse "hate speech"?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 09:03 AM
1

She hurt both men (Depp) Depp is only one man. Why is Heard hurting "men"?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:28 AM
1

That is exactly what "Amber Heard is hurting REAL victims of Domestic Violence!" means
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:48 AM
4

That narrative won't stick because Amber is too dirty. Feminists are abandoning Amber now and instead coming up with the "Amber Heard is hurting REAL victims of Domestic Violence!" narrative, implying that women are still the real victims of DV. This narrative seems to be working.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:27 AM
3

there are still women that deal with domestic violence too who won't be listened to now thanks to Heard Then say it. Amber Heard is hurting women. Say it. I fucking dare you.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:45 AM
30

Should be "looks-ist", isn't it? They can't even get it right
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:57 PM
2

All it shows is there are women who hate men enough to write this. There's no evidence it was taken seriously back then at least. The same can't be said for men haters today.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:52 PM
2

Woke media these days seem to want us to think that only certain people can relate to certain movies... It's BS. Dance with Wolves and Avatar are timeless classics, they touch a part of the soul and tells a story all civilizations can relate to given the right presentation. Don't let them tell you otherwise.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 07:46 PM
68

Ahh so now "boys will be boys" is a feminist argument.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:25 PM
14

Feminism is the belief that men are to blame.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:22 AM
1

Why? Do feminists not blame Patriarchy for oppression of women?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:20 PM
18

At least they were honest, if only modern feminists are this honest.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:17 PM
1

you do realize your argument starts to read like original sin BS in which all men as a group are at fault for stuff people did in the past, right? This isn’t even remotely rational. You mean like how feminists blame Patriarchy for oppression of women?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:54 PM
1

And who or what caused society to ostensibly oppress women?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:26 PM
1

Feminism is standing up for women’s rights. And who is to blame for denying womens' rights and oppressing women?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:24 AM
15

how many times does this need to happen before guys wise up??? reddit twitter tiktok all censoring this kinda stuff now
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:22 AM
24

but you vastly underestimate mens stubbornness against change Men love change, men adapted to the Industrial Revolution seamlessly, welcomed the Digital Revolution and started every discovery initiative including Space discovery and historical colonization. Only when it comes to women will men refuse to acknowledge certain truths.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:18 AM
18

I don't know so i'm gonna call you incel :(
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:38 PM
1

Ohhhhhhh ad hominem time now? So fast?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:45 PM
1

Ohhhh so now you're pretending english speakers don't say "always" to describe common occurances?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:16 PM
3

Ohhhh so now you're pretending OP is stating a universal rule, instead of a common occurance?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:26 PM
17

I'm one of them. We believe in equal rights but will only start hashtags, outrage, cancel people, pressure UN to sanction countries, TEDtalks, demand more equality in movies and change laws only when womens' rights are harmed or inconvenienced. I "disagree" with hunting men for sport. Ask me anything.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:12 PM
16

The feminist branch of the ACLU and some parts of NOW wrote Amicus Briefs Why are they writing whatever the fuck that is, instead of doing something that might actually work? You know, like hashtags? Outrage? Cancelling people who oppose female draft? Pressuring UN to sanction countries that draft men but not women? TEDtalks about female draft? Demanding Hollywood make more movies with mandatory female conscription? You know, all the things feminists usually do when they actually want something …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:17 PM
16

But the feminist core, NOW, supported a draft equality for women. Are they starting hashtags? Is there outrage? Are they cancelling people who oppose female draft? Are they pressuring UN to sanction countries that draft men but not women? Are there TEDtalks about female draft? Are they demanding Hollywood make more movies with mandatory female conscription? Why not?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:08 PM
34

No no, only "feminazis" hunt men for sport. Real feminists "disagree" with hunting men for sport! Really. Tune in at 5 to hear us whine about urinating positions.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:53 AM
1

Only way to find out, is to measure the success rate of female murderers. Are female murderers also this bad at getting the job done?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:08 AM
1

Only one way to find out. Are female murderers this bad too at getting the job done?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:06 AM
2

I literally said I know it happens How do you know? Prove it without anecdotal examples like you demanded us to.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:44 AM
4

Lots of women love seeing men who know how to interact with kids. I get that there is more suspicion generally about men with kids this is such an insanely disproportionate reaction Nice anecdotes
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:43 AM
9

Feminism is the belief that men are to blame.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:22 AM
3

and the rational men also need to berate the minority of male peers who harass women. So that's why you're here. And pray tell, what would this achieve?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:46 PM
8

2 people in the jury voted guilty
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:19 PM
10

Now imagine he's a single father.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:49 PM
3

Careful now, don't give them ideas! "Feminism dominates the world, women most hurt!"
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:27 PM
4

You think if you bury your head in the sand then feminism will ignore you?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 03:13 PM
22

Women do not necessary have to do in the armed forces (air/land/sea). Why should women and men be defined just because of their gender So which is it?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 02:07 PM
66

Don't force us to conscript women or we will make everyone suffer! But if Singapore ever faces an “existential threat” by an aggressor, with a “sudden and great need” to boost its military, Dr Ng said he is certain that the Ministry of Defence and SAF would call on the Government of that day to enlist not only women, but also teenagers and older men to defend and save Singapore Look at the brave Ukrainian women! Possibly being drafted instead of actually being drafted. When Ukraine was invaded b…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:23 AM
1

So what is hers tory?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 08:42 AM
7

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:50 AM
10

Then wouldn't it be HISSTORY with two S? Which would then imply it's hisstory and herstory? ...really dude?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:38 AM
5

it’s a joke a book fair project So which is it?
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:36 AM
2

Feminists will pretend to agree but then blame Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 09:25 PM
2

"Humankind" https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10844898/
/r/MensRights06/05/22 07:03 AM
6

We live in a feminist world. If you wish to keep using feminist terms, you will be misunderstood. That is your choice I guess.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:54 PM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_theory
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:49 PM
12

But it just so happens we are talking about male suicides. By blaming toxic masculinity, observers will assume you are blaming patriarchy for male suicides.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:48 PM
14

Racism hath no fury like a woman scorned
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:41 PM
4

It doesn't imply men cause it at all. Indeed. But according to feminist theory it is.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:32 PM
12

You have the right concept, but your "toxic masculinity" is not the same toxic masculinity used by feminists For feminists, "toxic masculinity" is this invisible force useful for blaming men for all the bad things under the sun.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:31 PM
13

So why blame suicides on "toxic masculinity"?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:51 PM
44

Boy: commits suicide Society: Toxic Masculinity
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:11 PM
4

projection
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:10 PM
1

Not sure I understand. Are you saying that pretending Depp's situation is a rare occurance IS actually the best response for feminists at this point of time?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:34 PM
1

Exactly, this will never be passed and we all know it
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:52 AM
1

It's easy to take pleasure in women losing rights. Is the law even passed yet?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:01 PM
1

"Why won't they eat cake?"
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:54 PM
6

Feminists' best response should've been to feign "complete support" for Depp while doing nothing about it legally, slowly letting the outrage die out. By pretending Depp's situation is a rare occurance, will only make people angrier as everyone knows by now this is clearly not the case. This will only further wake people up to the feminist tyranny we live under. Pray feminists are this stupid.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:34 PM
8

Tbf tradcon women are mostly pick-mes
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:04 PM
5

Women like to say things they themselves don't believe to provoke a response from men. Sexual pleasure is derived from the resulting attention/drama.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:14 PM
33

Technically a Patriarchy is a society run by fathers. Monarchy = run by Monarch Theocracy = run by priests Patriarchy = run by fathers Society was indeed ran by tiny units ("families") ruled by fathers/husbands all over the world just 200+ years ago. But that was 200 years ago. Besides, even in monarchies it doesn't mean that monarchs must oppress their subjects. Why must Patriarchy = oppression of women?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:09 PM
-45

You must be American...
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:40 AM
7

The more ambiguous a law, the more it benefits feminists
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:32 AM
12

Feminism is the belief that men are to blame.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:26 AM
2

Yeah but conservatives said this wouldn't happen if you vet properly and lift, you know?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:24 AM
64

That's how you debate feminists, by saying what they think but don't dare to say. "But you are a woman. You must be innocent!"
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:44 AM
3

Record her while asking "And why would I want to kill my wife?" Take action accordingly.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 09:39 AM
16

She's basically calling these disorders misogynist: Histrionic personality disorder was borne out of the ‘hysteria’ diagnosis, which could only be given to women," The change was made in a revised version of the manual in 1980 after 'top psychiatrists theorised that ‘histrionic women were labile, egocentric, seductive, frigid, and childish" Women could be diagnosed with the 'disorder' for 'not smiling enough, not giving men enough sex, being lesbian or bisexual [or] being too assertive', among o…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 08:31 AM
1

"You bad"
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:40 PM
54

Lately I'm hearing boomers/conservatives blame instagram for the death of romance. These idiots would literally blame an app then see what's right before them.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:11 PM
18

Not just reject. Rejection is fine. Problem is they mock your emotions and use it to discredit your arguments.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:07 PM
1

a woman doesn't get cash and prizes from ex-husband and NOW they realize its unconstitutional? Come on man
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:58 PM
5

It's not coddling. It's apologizing. Sorry we have no choice but to arrest a woman. Please forgive us, we worked really hard! “We work really hard to encourage people who have been a victim of sexual abuse – no matter how long ago - to report it. You will be listened, you will receive the help and support you need and we will do all that we can to achieve justice where offences have taken place. Please continue to believe we are feminists. “However, I do not want this to deter people from report…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 02:42 PM
3

And they say Quebec is based. Lmao
/r/MensRights29/04/22 10:54 AM
6

Even feminists don't dare side with AH now. Their new narrative is that "hes no saint too" and that "both sides look bad".
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:31 AM
1

my statement that the hit was with a basketball. Really? OP was refering to men getting kicked in the nuts: earlier today i was watching kobra kai, and the female minor in the show kicked a bunch of male minors in the crotch, and it was used as a joke Your response is that violence on women is just as funny as violence on men: It's just as funny when a man gets hit in the nuts with a basketball as when a woman gets hit in the tits You cite this as proof that MRAs who care about men being kicked …
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:26 AM
1

What's wrong? I'm just asking questions. Your premise is that violence on men and women is equally funny. It's just as funny when a man gets hit in the nuts with a basketball as when a woman gets hit in the tits I'm testing your hypothesis. Why so upset now?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:39 PM
1

I'm pretty sure if you watch anything with Melissa McCarthy she will have some physical comedy where she's getting injured in some way Are you pretending this is proof of there being supposedly a great deal of scenes where women get kicked in the breasts?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:26 PM
1

That's not what I asked
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:20 PM
2

Consent be damned All male environments Are you saying consent is only important when females are around?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:18 PM
6

But I did when I was a child and people done it to me. It was also done (among many other things) to each other in the military. Is mutually consented fun what OP is describing here?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 12:16 PM
10

You kick your pals in the nuts for shits and giggles?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 10:20 AM
10

Of course it depends on the context Oh? In which context is violence on mens' testicles for humor finally unacceptable then?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 08:01 AM
1

World's so crazy theres honestly no way to tell
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:53 AM
20

Men hitting women. Funny?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:42 AM
1

Is it also crazy and sexist for women to hit men?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:41 AM
13

That's why there are so many scenes of women getting kicked in the tits, right?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:19 AM
1

I honestly had not read the post when I made above comment lmao
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:08 AM
7

Feminism is the belief that men are to blame.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:58 AM
2

No. Unlike conservatives, feminists won't sit and do nothing.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:57 AM
7

People can think whatever they want to think Except MRAs apparently
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:52 AM
0

No it's not. The point of MRM is equal rights. People share their stories to provide anecdotal evidence and witness to the brutality of feminism. If you just want a soapbox to air your grievances, try /r/menslib i heard they're very patient and even provide free counselling sessions where they teach you how bad Patriarchy is.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 09:46 AM
8

we can be better You dont know what the point of my post was. So which is it?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:34 AM
16

Let me guess, this is the weekly reminder that /r/mensrights should be more "welcoming to women" and less "hateful", whatever that means Am I right?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:31 AM
1

Because they're MRAs. They think they can talk feminists into giving men their rights.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:27 AM
1

The male lion is the only animal that can keep the lioness in check. Even in actual lion society this isn't remotely true.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/22 03:24 AM
1

If he found a woman who was as strong as him, that would be a fair fight and would be equal to him slapping Chris Rock. Oh ok. Let's do this again then. Do you think Jada will watch and say nothing too if Will hit a woman who was as strong as him?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:50 PM
1

If someone murders in your name and you are aware, yet you let it happen and stayed silent after, are you not complicit?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:41 PM
1

No, I said it's morally reprehensible to attack someone who's smaller and weaker than yourself. But you did claim that Will is bigger than an average woman: Will is easily bigger than the average woman. You then went on to say attacking someone weaker is more morally reprehensible: if Will slapped someone who was clearly smaller and weaker than himself, that would be a much more serious situation Since the "average woman" is supposedly smaller than Will Smith, and it is more wrong for Will Smith…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:38 PM
1

Will is easily bigger than the average woman that would be a much more serious situation So now you're telling me it's more morally reprehensible for a man to hit a woman, than if he hit a man?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:27 PM
1

I'm also not happy he hit a man and everyone played it off. Do you not see Jada's role in this as well? Is she not the most guilty out of all the onlookers, since she has the most influence to condemn Will in this situation yet chose not to? What defence do you have for her silence and complicity in this whole event? If someone murders in your name and you are aware, yet you let it happen and stayed silent after, are you not complicit?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:26 PM
1

Ok, forget speculation then. Would you be happy if Will hit a woman and everyone around played it off like nothing happened? Would you keep silent if you are Jada?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:09 PM
1

Do you think Jada will watch and say nothing too if Will hit a woman?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 11:57 AM
1

I'm not really here to speculate on what she may have done if he'd have hit a woman. Why not? You were very eager to speculate on Will's mental stability: He hit a man because he's mentally unstable. You were happy to speculate on Jada's mental health: She can also be a victim of her own mental state, which also appears to be fucked, in a word. You were happy to speculate on the Smiths' current marriage situation: and he does appear to be in an emotionally abusive relationship, You were even wil…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 10:07 AM
1

She would ideally come out with a statement condemning violence as the right way forward, but she's under no obligation to do so Really? If Will Smith hit a woman do you think she would stay silent?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:37 AM
1

The correct PR response might be just to make him apologize while she says nothing. And if Will Smith hit a woman?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:36 AM
2

So if they thought it was better pr then they might Since you realize both Mr and Mrs Smith have public relations (PR) to consider, how can you turn a blind eye when Jada remains silent to her husband's violence? She did do something. She rolled her eyes. What kind of response should she give for his violence? Why act like you don't know what the proper response should be?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:37 AM
1

REALLY? You really think if Will Smith hit a woman at the Oscars, that his wife will condemn him privately?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 05:49 AM
0

Gee, I wonder what kind of response she would give if he hit a woman....? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm such a tough question. What do you think?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 05:43 AM
1

Can u elaborate? You should be asking "Relationship Lover" this instead of us, don't you think?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:38 AM
3

lmao this "consent can be retracted" talk will come full circle and smack some women in the face for sure when they realise how awful they too can be. Conservatives will step in to ensure feminism never smacks women in the face.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:33 AM
0

No one on the Left "condemned" Smith. They simply "disagreed" with what he did. There will be no outrage, no anger, no cancelling, no mob movement of any sort on social media. Neither will there be any had Chris pressed charges and Smith went to jail.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:30 AM
1

And violence
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:26 AM
3

Oh right, cos rolling eyes instead of condemning violence is the best response to violence! Most appropriate response! Let's all roll our eyes next time a woman gets violently assaulted!
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:25 AM
1

Then why didn't she condemn his actions?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:09 AM
1

No, the question is why didn't she condemn her husband's actions. Why?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:08 AM
8

The majority of NPCs will claim to "disagree" with what Will Smith did. The difference is they won't cancel him, like they would if a man hit a woman, or a white man hits a black man.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:56 PM
1

Fine, feminists and white knights then, how bout that
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:54 PM
1

Children aren't this sick.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:53 PM
1

You fucked ukrainian refugees?
/r/TheRedPill28/03/22 07:47 PM
8

Then why did his very stable wife watch and did nothing? Said nothing too?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:41 PM
4

Then they will shoot a man on stage and claim it in the name of Chivalry. You can't ignore the world forever.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:39 PM
2

So you think I wrong because I'm not a follower of every left ideal? I didn't say that. You realise men's rights is apposed to many femanist ideals, making this sub part of the left eating the left, too. You're not making sense. Mens' rights are opposed to feminist ideas, and feminist ideas are on the Left. So how are men's rights on the left?
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:23 PM
2

Conservatives are controlled opposition. It's so painfully obvious any non-Westerner can see it.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:12 PM
7

the left eat themselves. Said the conservatives for the past 10 years, as they continue losing battle after battle
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:09 PM
5

"submit to me"
/r/MensRights27/03/22 10:44 AM
1

I knew some motherfucker will say this. Yeah, cos that's the point here
/r/MensRights26/03/22 05:47 PM
3

The urge to accuse women murderers of femicide too will be strong, but doing so will only help feminists enforce their feminist ideas. Unfortunately, MRAs often fall into the trap of enforcing feminist ideas on behalf of feminists.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 05:46 PM
2

Even the great EBB believed the lie that there was supposedly a time when feminism was about equality: For some time it represented a real tendency towards equality by the removal of certain undoubted grievances No wonder mens rights failed since the 19th century.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:58 PM
1

And your sub will get banned
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:37 PM
4

What illusion will they sell to the next generation of men? The male urge to be the only man in the room
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:30 PM
2

Yeah but then feminists will blame men/patriarchy for conscription and then society will somehow see that as a valid explanation as to why inequality is allowed and encouraged.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 01:36 PM
1

Tell me you played along lol No actually, tell me you dumped that woman
/r/TheRedPill06/03/22 01:30 PM
4

You don't. You repeat what their saying but replace men with women.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 09:26 AM
2

then we can’t unify to discuss REAL issues Such as? Feminists denying the rights of every men aren't real enough for you...?
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:56 AM
6

The feminist herself LITERALLY admitting it isn't fake: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6206701/Law-student-20-pours-water-mixed-BLEACH-mens-groins-Russia-stop-manspreading.html Russian politicians demand her prosecution: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2018/09/27/tolstoy-plums-and-a-chicken-a63014
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:45 AM
0

The Western news outlet love it. But it still looks extremely bad. This is how you win propaganda wars and Russians are very angry after this video. If it is staged (I don't think it is) it is genius, feminists use these tactics all the time anyway. PROOF: Feminists around the world disavowing such an act: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/stories-45921951 https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-opinion-on-feminist-Anna-Dovgalyuk-pouring-bleach-on-men-in-the-St-Petersburg-metro-and-her-plan-to-do-the-same-…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:35 AM
0

For once the men are shown as victims? We should be funding this!
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:23 AM
1

I'm just speculating but I'm guessing you have certain rights that apply in Russia you don't know of yet. There's no other reason why her family will treat you "nice".
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:16 AM
1

I'm gonna call BS on this unless there's a source, personal experience living there gynocentrism is strong in Turkey.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:13 AM
1

Ok so from I understand, your mother takes 50%. So if your salary is X, you now earn X/2 But X/2 comes with it the benefit of free medication (M), so your real monthly salary now is X/2 + M If you move out, your monthly salary is all of X minus rent (R), or X - R In short, you move out the minute X - R > X/2 + M X will only keep increasing as you get older, so it's just a matter of time before the lefthand side equation exceeds the righthand side. Don't lose hope.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 06:38 PM
1

Now wikipedia even points out age gaps between married historical figures. Historical figures!!
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:30 PM
4

What?
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:26 PM
3

as I consider myself a gentleman It is at this moment you knew, OP fucked up
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:47 PM
2

"I won't tell you how ugly you are, though I often think so." "Why you angry, cos I'm willing to admit it?"
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:36 PM
1

Why should it be our goal to find equality in that? Are you saying you're a feminist and you don't want equality...?
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:57 AM
6

Even if they say their against draft, they won't act on it. Even if they acted on it, women won't be forced into combat positions. Even if women were forced into combat positions, they won't be forced to the frontlines. Even if they were forced to the frontlines, women can just get pregnant. And then what?
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:18 AM
8

I thought it's about equality?
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:16 AM
6

None of these early feminists denied this was feminism's entire goal. It's only modern feminists who pretend this isn't the case.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 07:29 PM
1

Women are slightly inconvenienced now that laws force men to say no to marriage. Women are slightly inconvenienced now that #MeToo made men afraid of women in the workplace, making it difficult for women to form connections and friends. Slight inconvenience to women is seen as "harm" by many.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 06:00 PM
5

If Men's Rights groups want to be recognized we need to be better than them How's that working out for you?
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:33 PM
2

International Women's Day was always about feminism.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:32 PM
1

What a good boy you are!
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:31 PM
1

Feminism harmed women but only as a result of unintentional collateral damage. Feminism as an idealogy has always set out to harm men.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:30 PM
5

This biggest damage is done to aborted babies, divorce-raped husbands and broken families.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:28 PM
25

Feminists will agree but blame men/patriarchy for it and then bam we're back to square one
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:26 PM
1

You honestly haven't met feminists who blame men/patriarchy for all the world's problems? (which is all of them) But we don't have to look far. How about you? What do you think is the cause for violence on men?
/r/MensRights18/02/22 03:57 AM
1

Men aren’t avoiding marriage because of women, they are avoiding it because of the systems around women and marriage. Yes, also known as cause and effect. There is no grand conspiracy to punish women. Neither do you need to get angry when we enjoy their predicament.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 04:05 PM
4

This thread is about declining marriage rates. What are you on about?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 03:29 PM
1

It’s not even cause and effect. How about the declining marriage rates then? How do you rationalize that away?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 03:27 PM
19

Funny i saw this video the other day, "when a simp meets an incel": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhx32xBmzRc In it they portray the "incel" as a supposedly conservative neckbeard who hates woman. In the comments you will hear people pointing out how the "incel" seems too confident and charismatic for an incel. Another will reply how the incel's arrogance is just right for someone who hates women. Another will point out how the incel should be worshipping women instead of looking down on them.…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:00 PM
40

We don't call them NPCs during the argument to discredit their points, do we?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:48 PM
1

Also, the more seriously police investigates rape (pouring all manpower and personnel into asking the accuser exactly when, where, who and how the rape took place), the more feminists see this as "violating".
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:44 PM
1

Feminist: But it's other men killing men So do the feminists OP spoke to.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:33 PM
7

Feminist: You're a man, nothing will happen to you Feminist: But it's other men killing men Feminist: PATRIARCHY! WE WOMEN DEAL WITH SO MUCH, WHY CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND At least pretend to have read the post...
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:32 PM
2

Because feminism is about blaming men. That's why everytime someone points out an inequality all the feminist has to do is somehow blame men for it... Feminist: But it's other men killing men ... and then VOILA! We're back at feminism. It was never about equality.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 02:30 PM
2

What if only the female dogs in the entire dog population are misbehaving?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 02:21 PM
2

I'll finish with a story. Two different types of ants can live peacefully in a jar until you shake it. Then one group attacks the other. Don't be mad at the other group, be mad at whoever shook the jar. You do know that one group of ants actively supports and controls the hand that shakes this jar, right? You do know this group of ants also wants to see the other group get eaten, preferably by them, right? You do know this group of ants also controls all the rules and laws of the ant colony, rig…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 02:18 PM
7

Men who say no to modern women cannot browse forums...?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 02:09 PM
-1

No one's talking "justice", justice will be charging all the women who aborted their babies and divorce-raped their husbands in court. This is simply cause and effect. Behave shitty, people ignore you. Is this "fire and brimstone" to you already? Part of red pill is learning not to white knight. Be better.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 02:06 PM
2

This article is saying they can't.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 01:54 PM
5

They will also further demonize age gaps because they know they can't compete with younger.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/22 01:54 PM
1

Vilar never argued that women are stupid, only that they leave knowledge seeking to men while they learn how to manipulate men.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/22 07:00 PM
1

They stick different flower stickers on social media, but otherwise the idea is the same.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/22 06:43 PM
5

majority of the guys here at TRP calling out women for nexting/ghosting guys for opening up would do the same to a woman emotionally opening up to them. How do you even know that? How did you come to such a conclusion? You do know normal guys not sick in the mind don't ghost their girlfriends for vulnerability, right? he women are just misguided that they're better and "they care" but honestly they don't give a fuck. It's not, its a shit test and the men fell for it. And you rationalized it away…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/22 12:27 PM
20

The first time you open up, tell her shit that ain't real. If she uses it against you it's super hilarious
/r/TheRedPill12/02/22 12:20 PM
14

Like all things in TRP, you can't take it literally. When guys hear "open up", what they think is to be completely honest and open with their woman. This is of course a problem if the man has been putting on an act or a tough facade all this while. And then there those who are stupid enough to "open up" as a result of her incessant nagging and guilt tripping. In this case she loses respect because you fell for her trap. Of course there are women who will lose tingles no matter what you do and le…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/22 10:19 AM
1

This is why you use a different name for each girl...
/r/TheRedPill11/02/22 10:14 AM
1

All that abortion of girls because they want boys has come around to bite their asses. That's not really significant though, Western media greatly exaggerated this phenomenon. It's also only relevant in the countryside, city dwellers are completely unaffected... yet city dwellers are the gynocentric ones! It has more to do with communism I believe.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/21 05:22 AM
1

Yeah but modern China is so incredibly gynocentric the whole point of parents' involvement is so the woman's family can extract the highest bride price oops i mean, "Wedding gift" from the man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 05:40 PM
1

This. It makes me wonder if this means the Christian Church is forever doomed
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/21 07:46 AM
1

Flexing on lesser men while accepting different idealogies is the hallmark of the insecure male
/r/RPChristians26/08/21 12:07 PM
3

They also said 98% of sexual harassment accusations turn out to be true
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:18 AM
2

I guessed as much lol. There doesnt seem to be a place on the internet quite like Dalrock these days, after he retired. Many pretenders, but none like Dalrock... pretty sad
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/06/21 04:25 AM
3

Once you realize women like these are the financial backbone to the church industry, you'll never go to church again regardless of your beliefs.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/21 12:16 PM
2

Unchivalrous Christian A Dalrock reader, might I presume? :)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/21 12:03 PM
2

but let's say actually rapists, people , not depending on gender, who make forced consent should fucking die You do know having sex while the both of you are drunk can now be "rape" too, right?
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 05:01 AM
2

sex offender should fucking die You do know even touching a woman inappropriately at work now can make you a "sex offender", right?
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 04:21 PM
1

What about the divorce-raped?
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 12:44 PM
1

Yes but OP is pointing out the hypocrisy of society. Why so quick to shut down criticism of it?
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 12:34 PM
4

Unfortunately, I have heard many dads say they would be delighted if their sons marry single mothers. It takes a whole 'nother level of cuck to want your own son to get cucked
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 12:31 PM
2

One thing we have to note when talking about female groomers, is that feminists have no problem sacrificing one or two female groomers to heavy jail time, if it means wrestling back control of the narrative of "equality". But don't mistake this as a push for equality. Women know deep down that if a society is ready to punish a woman, then that society is ready to see men punished twice as much. By punishing one female sex offender, feminists now have excuse to punish male sex offenders even more…
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 12:27 PM
1

Of course it won't be that high. You must understand how feminism works. Feminism only works if you can convince yourself women are oppressed by men. So the "brain development at 25" theory will simply be used to prove how misogynistic and patriarchal society still is. If indeed age of consent is risen to 25 then a lot of people today men and women will be paedophiles. Which means they deserve to die get r*ped in jail skinned alive and tortured to death and is worse than a murderer. Since half o…
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 11:56 AM
3

but the worst part is that someone WANTED ME THAT WAY, my mother, my grandmother, my aunt, my female cousins, my female teachers, other random females, all wanted to mold me into the perfect simping machine Yes but hey, always remember to blame men! Even on here on mgtow. On this very same thread. Upvoted too! These guys are worse than women. yes, you can easily ignore women and accept their nature, but traitorous men who are weak and betray their fellow men are the worst.
/r/MGTOW19/04/21 06:54 PM
4

First one is bad too I'm pretty sure her "autocorrect" is intentional
/r/MGTOW19/04/21 06:46 PM
3

Like when adult women refer to themselves as young girls or bullshit like that But notice how these same women always age-shame the older, or even similar aged men around them. Notice the words and labels they will use to describe these men. You cannot unsee it once you start noticing
/r/MGTOW19/04/21 06:36 PM
12

They're saying now "brain development" completes at 25
/r/MGTOW19/04/21 06:30 PM
3

I think it's because those supporting womens' rights are often feminist or femcels themselves. SJWs always project, it makes sense.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:22 PM
1

China is busy making men more masculine Who told you that? Did you know a disturbingly high percentage of Chinese men wire their salary directly to their wives' accounts? And if they don't their wives beat them? Stop looking at American news my friend, actually do some business in China that's where all the money is.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:11 PM
8

Therefore anyone who made me feel uncomfortable at work is an asshole. True You gotta be fucking kidding me
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:00 PM
25

Idk woman.I'd lose my shit too if I have to work around someone with more rights than me and there was a possibility they would ruin my life with false accusations or got me cancelled. Therefore anyone who made me feel uncomfortable at work is an asshole.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:50 PM
29

Womens' feelings have mattered more than mens' rights for quite some time now
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:48 PM
19

They're just waiting to pounce at imaginary monsters
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:47 PM
17

"What can we do to make Men more comfortable without trampling over women?" see anything wrong with this question?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:41 PM
2

Can't call yourself conservative if you don't hate men somehow
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:39 PM
5

That's the part cuckservatives come in. Abortion? Blame men! Divorce raped? Should have vet better! Falsely accused? Man up! Women unbearable? Learn Game! ... See? It's really not that hard! Stop complaining already
/r/MensRights19/04/21 05:02 AM
7

Only 2nd? Bro, even certain animals generate more sympathy than us
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:39 AM
6

The pendulum will swing back eventually It won't because the Right (the only semblance of opposition to feminism) is too busy trying to white knight
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:38 AM
13

Are you really pretending there are no feminist subs on reddit?
/r/MensRights18/04/21 03:27 PM
1

Both
/r/MensRights18/04/21 03:27 PM
15

The day cuckservatives learn to play dirty too, is the day they stop losing.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 10:23 AM
7

OH ME ME CAN I GET MY BAN TOO? /r/offmychest
/r/MensRights18/04/21 10:20 AM
14

Spot on! Indian women good Indian men bad therefore brother-in-law should pay alimony
/r/MensRights18/04/21 10:18 AM
3

Indeed it sounds like a move in the right direction, my point is this won't automatically cure gynocentrism. It remains to be seen how this will be carried out in practice.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 09:51 AM
1

For the reasons I just stated
/r/MensRights18/04/21 09:50 AM
6

"default" just means the court has authority to give full custody to either parent in certain "circumstances", right?
/r/MensRights17/04/21 06:27 PM
2

gold and gilded for OP too /r/menrights have clearly lost control of the narrative Can't say I'm surprised though. Anyone delusional enough to think men can scream until they have rights....
/r/MensRights16/04/21 12:21 PM
0

then nobody is going to stop you from it, Really? What about OP's post? Is he not trying to stop us? people elsewhere is just going to start taking this place less and less serious. I disagree. I know MGTOWs will take this place more seriously. I know one of the reasons MGTOWs find MRAs useless is because mgtows believe women are the cause of this feminist mess. Mgtows believe nothing will happen until women are held accountable for feminism. Are mgtows not people too? Unless of course, mgtows a…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:35 AM
1

There's a difference between a woke "leftist" and an economic leftist. Large companies are sure as hell not economically leftist. But they do love to appear woke, which makes people assume that they are leftist. That's not /u/StefanosOfMilias argument. His argument is that Reddit is "Right wing", simply because they did what they want. this is the right in action, a capitalist company saying fuck you, its our site, we can do what we want Later on he changed his definition of what a "right winger…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:35 PM
18

United Nations OUTRAGED! Cracking down on Finland NOW! Brave and stunning hashtags on twitter RIGHT NOW!
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:16 PM
1

Companies, or more accurately the people that own them and who control the capital behind them are capitalists. Working class americans are just that, working class. Oh ok, so any shareholder of a company are right wingers now? Regardless of their beliefs? The people with the capital set the rules. Bro trust me, i wish reddit and twitter were secretely fanatic leftists so that the tens of millions of americans would have some hope of escaping poverty but it just isnt the case. That's not the que…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:34 PM
10

Its not about victimization alone, your point is absolutely valid but I believe that a men’s rights group should be to focus on law and policy making that supports men such as laws for false accusations, criminalization of male rape, fairness in child custody, fairer laws on alimony and child support, better healthcare for men, better mental health support for men, non-compulsory drafting for men or compulsory drafting for women as well, these are the kind of issues i want readings on, thoughts …
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:30 PM
11

The vast majority of posts are just making men out to be victims of an unjust world. In reality, those in the west won't notice huge differences in their lives being men or women. Excuse me /r/mensrights how is this comment upvoted? I get OP is here to white knight but he's just one guy
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:21 PM
31

You can collect all the posts in the last month and make a physical count. Then collect a post from "back in the day" when you thought this sub used to be better, than do another physical count. Then you can tell us the results. You can even make an Excel sheet. But really, this is your hypothesis. Shouldn't you prove it, instead of asking us how to prove it? And all for what? Just to make sure we're not blaming women for this mess? Why? What if women are responsible for this mess? Shouldn't peo…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:14 PM
1

its only goal is profit That is inherently capitalist which means inherently right wing So... everyone in America who isn't unemployed is right wing? Regardless of their beliefs? Really? Because they are slightly liberal on the social side-which is the mainstream mind you and the least controvertial from a pr stand point And lets not pretend they dont also ban left wing spaces like chapotraphouse and the like. So which is it? Is reddit pretending to be left wing but actually right wing? Or is re…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 04:53 PM
2

What if we identify as women?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:13 PM
6

A left leaning company saying fuck you to everyone on the right, but the company maximizes profits therefore the company is part of the right? Do you even hear yourself?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:12 PM
1

but all his former partners came out to say he wasn’t ever violent with them So women saved Johnny, got it. Dayum i was hoping a man could clear his own name for once
/r/MensRights13/04/21 02:30 PM
2

You spend half a day to convert 1 woman Social media converts millions every hour
/r/MensRights12/04/21 02:14 PM
2

You demand "credible research papers" for the existence of testosterone: Could you maybe enlighten me to credible research papers regarding this aggression in men rooted in men's biology? But when someone do point out testosterone as a factor, you respond with... an nypost article! In response to your other points regarding testosterone being the prime culprit causing aggression in men, this could be a good read for you : An article you can't be bothered to check, but you want us to check out an…
/r/MensRights12/04/21 02:05 PM
1

What exactly is your point? OP asked one question. Has Anyone Noticed How The Disadvantages Of Being A Woman Are Being Treated Like Societal Issues? Now you're talking about "Patriarchy" and demanding "credible research papers" for... testosterone?! Could you maybe enlighten me to credible research papers regarding this aggression in men rooted in men's biology? Why?
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:56 PM
14

Because feminism is the belief that everything bad is mens' fault. Therefore anytime anyone criticizes the current status quo, which is feminism, someone will respond that men are to blame and suddenly, bam, we're back at feminism.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:30 PM
1

The funny thing is there are probably hordes more femcels than male incels, considering how marriage gives a woman a free meal ticket for the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:20 PM
1

You're gonna just ignore how the rest of the world sees the term? You do know what "Incel" stands for, right? "In-Cel", you know?
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:17 PM
3

You just said that a female’s power comes from sex. But stereotyping half the world isn’t going to solve anything Well, there's only one way to find out. Isn't it? :)
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:09 PM
1

Rites of passages is society's way of indoctrinating men to do the hard work, many of them which involves dying. A free man will not love the shackles society tries to place him in. Yet, despite knowing this, a place in every man/boy's heart still yearns for a rite of passage. Perhaps this is where religion comes in.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/21 04:22 AM
1

One of the endlessly repeated falsehoods in threads about good girls/unicorns/etc. is the belief that women in a prior age were somehow different. This is a fallacious and sneaky version of the Women are Wonderful effect at work - their nature never changed to be suddenly less loyal, they simply (in the 1st world) have the same freedoms as men. But you cannot deny that modern feminist brainwashing has did a number of womens' brains. The sheer number of women hooked on anti-depressants today shou…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/21 04:06 AM
1

Ugly women might hate beautiful women, but it's nothing compared to their hate for men. Given a choice, they would choose to punish men over the beautiful woman, any day.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/21 08:04 PM
1

this small little bit of power that doesn't matter in the real world is all they have. Small bit? Dude, they control MINDS Kids who today get bullied for being white will grow into the type of soldiers who will give these scum a real reason to fear and hate white people. Yeah, that's why criminals in jail are so strong mentally and willing to help other men in need. Not. Nothing will change as long as the Right keep telling themselves they are not screwed
/r/TheRedPill10/04/21 06:33 PM
2

Women that have their shit toghether and men that have their shit toghether do not have the opportunity to get with fucked up people. Wow, so now anyone who got together with with a fucked up person, doesn't have their shit together? Really?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/21 11:31 AM
2

Most dudes that fuck know the signs of a woman that is in the game just to punish men You are also to blame. Don't do stupid shit, don't hang around with people that are emotionally unstable. So you're saying if falsely accused, it is the men's fault for not being able to tell the future? That's it? That's your grand white knight plan?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/21 10:39 AM
1

dayum i miss Dalrock...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 08:19 PM
1

The modern church is an industry, single mothers are the customers
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 07:36 PM
1

I have a mother. Nothing is more important than my mother. I like to be honest and bold about how I feel. Maybe I should put my mother on my dating profile too? What do you think?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 07:26 PM
3

Your model is wrong if you find dogs that bite, kids that yell, tsunamis or women that take your house away "wrong". What about the false accusations then? How you gonna defend that? Come on man, you had one job. One!
/r/TheRedPill20/03/21 07:16 PM
2

How you gonna white knight away her false accusations then? you'll always be 'not a good fit, mean, abusive, an asshole," etc. Many of the women I've been with would give me horror stories about the guys they had been with. I have yet to hear one confess about how she was the one at fault. I mean, I'm sure you can find some way to white knight for that too, I just wanna see how
/r/TheRedPill20/03/21 11:40 AM
3

But you don't write that down on a fking dating profile, it's disrespectful That's why men don't do that
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 11:26 AM
1

Wooo thanks for the gold! xD
/r/RPChristians07/01/21 04:41 PM
6

Yes, cuckservatives love to throw one another in front of the bus. Their goal is not to win, nor even to defend truth or "values". Their goal is to be the "better man", and they will gladly sacrifice those on their side to prove it. This is why no celebrity or famous personality dare to side with cuckservatives. They know it's not a feasible strategy in the long run.
/r/MGTOW07/01/21 12:09 PM
9

Finally. Some rage! LOL Maybe now cuckservatives will finally wake up and learn to fight dirty. ..... Nahhhhh who am i kidding they're cuckservatives lol
/r/MGTOW07/01/21 10:17 AM
0

"Butt-hurt" is just code for "aWWW look at that guy thinking I would treat him like a human being". God forbid any Christian male expect respect from others, let alone from his brethren. "Thou shall not Honor one another, much less above yourselves" -Romans 12:10 The irony of course, is that you cannot just ignore their criticisms, not here because then they can accuse your post of lacking "reasonable quality" (rule 4 --->) and maybe even delete it. So you have to seek their approval. But if you…
/r/RPChristians07/01/21 09:18 AM
1

Called after friendzoning to console you. Said no women ever. No really, this guy is too pure for this world
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/20 09:50 AM
1

Don't worry, it's much worse for women. The next few years are going to be very, very hard for women. So they'll lobby government to make more anti-men laws Or better still, start more witchhunts. Now that #MeToo is a thing, and Marital Rape is a thing too, what's stopping #WifesToo from happening? Don't kid yourself. It's never "worse" for the privileged class, they simply get side effects.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/20 09:34 AM
1

I once beat Brock with just pikachu. AMA
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/20 09:28 AM
1

They can't. Men won't buy Gillette again unless Gillette apologize for their feminism or some similar shit. But it's 2020, you can't just speak out against feminism. There's no way back form this if you're Gillette, unless they find a simp market in India (probably already happening as we speak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCR24jyhfZk) But overall this is the first time I've seen men band together and fight back against the culture. If only men would do this more.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/20 09:28 PM
1

For every marriage, there are tons of men who get away with it too. Some wives are so satisfied with their product i mean, husbands they wouldn't dream of divorce-raping their husbands. I guess we should all advise other men to get married too, eh?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/20 08:40 AM
2

If they all liked him enough to have sex with him, it would be a different story. Really? How many more MeToo scalps must there be before you (all) stop deceiving yourselfs?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/20 07:45 AM
1

Just admit you are no longer safe and that your life can be ruined even if you took every precaution. Spinning plates is the new Marriage of 2020, you're playing Russian Roulette with #MeToo instead of the courts. At this rate any American still advocating for spinning plates is just downright irresponsible.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/20 11:30 PM
15

The advice isn't technically wrong. We all should have a direction in life independent of women, regardless of what it is. The problem with the "have a mission" excuse tho is that it really is just another way of saying "Man Up". This is easily proven: Just tell them your "mission" in life is something they don't want to hear. Try the following: 1) Tell them your "mission" in life is something radical. Tell them you wish to defeat feminism. Or tell them you wish to be a professional MRA. You can…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/20 10:14 AM
2

"Yup Feminism is just a shit test" That's the motto of Married DadTards Nope, that's the motto of fucking TRP
/r/TheRedPill13/07/20 02:03 PM
1

That does not explain how feminism is also so strong in the rest of the non-Western world
/r/TheRedPill11/07/20 07:39 PM
1

And I was just letting you know that your biggest enemy isn't the Left. It is the people you are talking to right now.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 07:38 PM
1

We should spread our ideas. Using manipulation and re-framing speech the same way the left does. But then red pill will be your enemy. Just focus on yourself, remember? Everyone who hates you is just a "shit test" The Right has all the tools they need if they wish to win the Left, but they choose not to time and time again.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 09:58 AM
2

more will turn their back on it. But they won't do anything about it. They'll never be as loud or radical as the progressives. The progressives will get what they want. The conservatives/Redpillers will continue telling you to stare at yourself, ignore what's going on. Same old story. The sky is blue.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 09:52 AM
2

What is the line where focusing on yourself is putting your head in the sand? The line is when they tell you not to care about what's happening (example "its just a shit test")
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 09:44 AM
3

Do not seek to convince yourself that men as a whole has ever been as fucked as we are now
/r/TheRedPill10/07/20 09:38 AM
3

Of course, but trp really needs to elaborate on the "enjoy the decline" whlie we're living in it. It's ironic becos they say enjoy the decline, yet don't seem to fully understand that it means women are declining too. so being red pill and focusing on yourself stops mattering if the rest of society just keeps taking more and more from you By their logic an ostrich who buries his head in the sand is red pilled. A frog sitting in a well doing pushups all day is red pilled. It's not, it's pathetic.…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 05:12 PM
2

I wasn't even stating an argument, I was trying to teach lol
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 02:07 PM
1

I think it's better to say that each is the right answer to different times and societies. I'd definitely be mgtow if Im an American, MeToo is getting really bad there.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/20 06:21 PM
7

Spinning plates is the new marriage of 2020. You're playing Russian Roulette with #MeToo instead of the courts. It's very simple, really. Red Pill teaches you if a woman isn't good enough, you next her. Right? So why can't a mgtow guy decide to next all woman? Red Pill also teaches you that society is fucked, and that it will only get worse. Right? Enjoy the Decline!, right? So by that logic doesn't that mean women and society are getting more and more fucked up, as time goes on? Think about it.…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/20 06:15 PM
2

Fuck I'm so conflicted now, because I have been so vocal about it being okay to want sex and be motivated by sex, and the guys who want to make the sub about reaching a higher consciousness throwing shit off topic I'm one of the latter guys tbh. I will never agree with people throwing shit off topic of course (becos nowhere else can you even discuss male sexual strategy) But at some point you must realize that if women is your goal, you will be a WIMP (women-influenced-male-person). You cannot a…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/20 08:04 PM
2

So now, men who would go into battle with you, build a house with you, pick you up when you are down, be real friends and brothers... Assets to our lives. Just loser competition who aren't able to please the almighty woman like we can... Fuck that. Men are not disposable and we are not just competition in the bitch pleasing race. It's worse than that. They're not just saying you're disposable. They're saying it's in your nature to be disposable to women. This effectively absolves them of all res…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/20 06:08 PM
8

cancel culture. Heard of it?
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 09:20 PM
13

The OP literally states that there is evidence that "male disposability" is a result of social conditioning There is also evidence that suggest male disposability is a result of social conditioning, not instinct. But I suppose it makes men feel better about themselves to think the reason they get to mate is due to their greatness the ones who prove themselves get to fuck. It's glorious. Instead rejoice in being disposable "Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 09:19 PM
2

From where I'm standing TRP is a safe space for guys with no game. FROM MY POINT OF VIEW THE JEDI ARE EVIL
/r/TheRedPill01/07/20 07:16 AM
1

I hate to beat a dead horse online, but in this case you're clearly still not hearing my point. Burning down your fields before the wildfire goes through them to speed up the regrowth I'm not telling you to burn the fields before the wildfire burns it in order to speed regrowth. I'm telling you to burn the fields before the wildfire burns it to wake up the sleeping owner so that he does something about the wildfire. The closer the fire hits his home, the better. Look, just think about what I sai…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/20 06:16 AM
1

Except for the damage of such a #WivesToo movement. But it will happen anyway. There has always been resentment among wives, this isn't news. Women are just biding their time waiting for the right moment, just like they waited till 2017 to unleash #MeToo when they could have done so in 2007. They just weren't sure white knights would defend their cause back in 2007 (cos society ain't so fucked up yet). If we let the feminists wait till 2027 to do WivesToo the damage will happen anyway, but this …
/r/TheRedPill01/07/20 05:34 AM
1

Far more people get red pilled by growing up observing a tyrannical single mother household or a weak beta billy father figure than otherwise. But even these red pilled men won't 'snap'. They won't take up arms against perceived oppression like the BLM would. Against a mob these redpilled men are technically useless. just spreading TRP knowledge, which has become more and more mainstream and will happen as the younger generation sees how well the progressive movement has been working. just sprea…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/20 04:07 AM
1

The image is right but it's misleading in terms of feminism. It's not weak men that caused feminism, it's feminist lies that caused it. And before you jump to accuse weak men of being "too weak to believe feminism", consider this: Justinian the First Cuck (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justinian_I) conquered half the known world.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 05:21 PM
1

At this point of time I think the best thing to do is to accelerate MeToo as much as possible. Seriously, like let's get Wives to start #WivesToo as well. The only way this can end is when men take up arms against oppression. I say we give it a little push.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 12:22 PM
0

Feminine men have always taken root in urban, cosmopolitan hubs where knowing how to navigate the social structure was patently superior to raw ability. Part of this is the ruling class attempting to bifurcate itself from the lower classes, the other is the demands and amenities of urban life superseding the virtues that laid the foundation for their material excess. It's one of the few secular phenomena you can set your watch to. I doubt that. How do you explain the rise and fall of beards on m…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 05:18 AM
3

Regarding the appeal of "feminized" men in Korea and Japan, it's the association of cleanliness and decorum with status. With the latter country, this is a very old social dichotomy that can be traced back to the Heian court. The top tier men involved in bureaucracy and royal lineage don't have obvious musculature (no strenuous labor like farmers or merchants), possess pale skin (no working in the fields), lack facial imperfections or scars (sans manual labor and fighting) and observe propriety …
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 05:53 PM
1

We aren’t here to denigrate men - there is a fine line between a drill instructor imparting tough love But the point IS to denigrate men. As a military man yourself, surely you can see that too? How else is the OP gonna beat his chest and convince himself he is the Alpha in this room? The Drill Instructer for God? (https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2016/11/03/gods-drill-instructors-language-warning/) As military personnel you should know that efficiency and effectiveness are hallmarks of a man. Whic…
/r/RPChristians28/04/20 08:27 PM
3

"institutionalized patriarchy"
/r/MGTOW28/04/20 06:44 PM
8

Yeah but gotta find some way to white knight you know? Somehow. Even here in mgtow
/r/MGTOW28/04/20 05:25 AM
4

He's right, I remember back in 2005 there were no mean people at all.
/r/MGTOW27/04/20 06:15 PM
28

I would also fire any of those coworkers who gave her money in the app You and every feminist/women commenting there agree
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 05:18 PM
2

and the government should do something about it but it isn't a RIGHT So which is it? If you don't believe mental healthcare is a right then why do you believe governments should do something about it?
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 01:17 PM
7

What's missing? The execution? A guard dying is far too insignificant to be noted, much less by wikipedia if it goes against the feminist narrative. EDIT: So i just looked around abit, and even in Malay sources the execution doesn't seem to be mentioned. https://www.wikiwand.com/id/Sunandha_Kumariratana So I guess we can say it is technically possible the guard did not get executed. Though tbf, it doesn't seem like a huge possibility. It's very unlikely the King would respond to his spouse (and …
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 10:36 AM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunanda_Kumariratana
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 10:28 AM
30

Feminists: "You don't understand, this is the result of Patriarchy! BAD, BAD EVIL MEN patriarchy forced this law unto POOR, INNOCENT QUEENS because the king is too insecure and won't give her freedom and equality!" Tradcons: "You're supposed to just know when the rules apply, and when they don't apply! It's called common sense. These rules were set up to protect POOR, INNOCENT QUEENS from being touched by BAD, BAD, EVIL MEN. Not to prevent queens from being saved! You need to Man Up and sign up …
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 10:27 AM
1

mental health issues going unaided doesn’t have much to do with rights. If womens' mental health is being neglected, would womens' rights groups not be outraged? If animals' mental health is being neglected, would animal rights groups not be outraged? Would these above groups talk about "personal responsibility" when it is women or animals' mental health that are being neglected? But when it comes to mens' mental health, apparently the Manosphere finds it appropriate to derail the conversation b…
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 10:04 AM
2

They are both right! lol
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 05:14 AM
2

implying society does not have responsibility to uphold men's rights?
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 05:11 AM
9

TIME's magazine man of the year
/r/MGTOW24/04/20 07:34 PM
1

Exactly, even now she is lying. It's not "validation" she want from the bad boy, it's the badness of the bad boy that she wants. As if 'bad boys' ever give her validation of any sort. What she's really doing here is rationalizing her preference of men.
/r/MGTOW24/04/20 07:31 PM
1

When it comes to a woman advocating for men's rights, isn't it better to be glad she is willing to do that instead of jumping straight to "she's a chameleon, she's doing it for attention"? No, because these womens' real goal is to prove that AWALT isn't true. Their goal is to get woke men back to the plantation, preferably in service to her. Not to get men out of it.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 04:51 PM
6

Thank you for doing what most fathers would never lol Unfortunately, many countries still draft their sons, and the US still reserves the right to do so.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 07:26 AM
10

The only men who care about men are close friends Even your close friends will not die to protect your rights. Your "bros" won't say "OVER MY DEAD BODY!" if the State tries to draft you to fight in a war. Yet they will do that for women they have never met. Ironically, the only way to get men to care about other mens' rights and well-being, seems to be brothers-in-arms bonded through the heat of war. There really doesn't seem to be any other way.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:41 AM
2

Maybe it's better to be born male if you want to be the president or the next Elon Musk Even this isn't true anymore, now you have to colored or female or homosexual to fulfill diversity agendas. This is why feminists focus on nonsense like the ratio of female CEOs etc. To keep you focused at the top. Even if there are completely no women at the top it still doesn't prove the feminists' point. For every men ''at the top'' he has a wife at home that benefits from his fame and power (and probably …
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:22 AM
13

I believe there's gonna be a moment when the tipping point for men will be reached, all hell will break lose and it will probably destroy much of the current world & systems. Men don't care about other men. In his natural state men do not have a "tipping point" for other men since men view other men as competition and not as brothers. This is why feminists have been pushing men to his limits for 200 years now without reprisal. Men reserve their "tipping point" for women. Tell any men you want to…
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:17 AM
1

I know. It also doesn't mean that it didnt happen. The law was there for a reason, and people naturally acted upon it as they saw fit. Indeed, but you cannot therefore say that people in the past married their children off at 10. is that also why they married them when they were like 10 years old? That'll be like me saying people today marry their women off at 18. It's misleading, it's not true, and it implies parents today have authority to marry their children, which is also not true. Feminist…
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 05:32 AM
2

...bruh minimum age of marriage =/= average age of marriage minimum age of marriage =/= common practice Minimimum age of marriage in the US today is 18. Are americans getting married at 18? though to be fair to you that's a common mistake that even modern scholars (deliberately) make when studying historical matters which feminists have a vested interest in.
/r/MGTOW21/04/20 07:27 AM
1

10 years old You have a source for that? (I'd be very surprised if you do) IIRC even ancient romans and greeks married at like 13-16
/r/MGTOW21/04/20 07:10 AM
1

I literally don't even know what that means lol
/r/MGTOW19/04/20 07:10 AM
1

Both parties are responsible and until both parties are equally held accountable, no change will occur. the blame doesn’t solely fall upon men. This isn't about who is to blame for porn. I simply pointed out the double standards of the anti-porn camp to show that they are very much in sync with the feminist movement. Even if by some miracle society started holding women responsible for producing porn that still wouldn't change the fact that the anti-porn camp has been unfairly and incorrectly bl…
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 06:00 PM
4

Can I just say how fucking based this sub is. Say "quit porn" anywhere else on reddit and all the simp coomers will downvote the fuck out of you for saying it's pathetic to jerk off to porn. It's not wrong to tell others to quit porn. We downvote because 9 times out of 10 the call to quit porn is based on some weird feminist puritan belief that men who look at women sexually are bad, or some attempt to demonize "toxic masculinity". (feminists call this "objectification") Go to /r/nofap to see th…
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 10:24 AM
4

I'll take being a turbo simp over Husband any day. A turbo simp buys her a house. That's it. It's a one time transaction, no strings attached. A husband buys her a house but continues to be drained of income for the rest of his life. Then one day when she pleases she may or may not take half of all his stuff.... while continuing to collect her monthly tributes. Did I mention she also take your kids?
/r/MGTOW12/04/20 10:07 AM
1

...bruh
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 05:18 PM
2

The baby should have maintained frame to his mother and showed dominance with eye contact. Also the baby doesn't lift so it's clearly his fault
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 03:33 PM
5

If he snaps it's because of toxic masculinity. Also because he's white and is christian.
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 03:31 PM
11

Just watch her hit the wall at 24... She's gonna go on a drug/alcohol/cockcarousel binge. I CAME IN LIKE A WRECKING BALLLLLLLLLL
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 05:30 AM
3

It's worth noting that while redpillers and PUAs might laugh at tradcons, their weird hatred of MGTOWs and the reasoning behind it seems identical.
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 05:25 AM
6

common men will always choose the simp path. So don't be common men
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 05:24 AM
7

On the contrary, this case has been so publicized they'll probably make an example of AH just to show how "fair and equal" the law is. (Same reason TED let Cassie Jaye speak for 15 minutes on their show https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY) Then they'll smugly demand redpillers to "stop complaining now" and conservatives will pat themselves on the back telling themselves they are safe from their wives. By lynching one woman, the status quo remains and the #MeToo boycott seems justified. W…
/r/MGTOW08/04/20 11:38 AM
1

but certainly a sturdy public ostracisation We already do this btw. We just do this to sex offenders and the like instead, with no real opportunity to rejoin
/r/MGTOW07/04/20 06:53 AM
8

Any male feminist should be beaten for being a sex traitor. I know you're not serious and ur probably just joking and/or saying this as rant and anger..... but notice how women actually do do this. If any woman go against Team Woman she is instantly made a social pariah. Perhaps the solution to feminism is to do the same to male feminists
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 06:48 PM
4

Nice try. But YOU'RE the one telling men to stay quiet, and not upset the feminists, twinky. Where did I say that? ou have no idea what it means to have men rally; what it means for men to "step up" and be men. It's what they do naturally. YOU'RE the one trying to arrest that. And when did I say that? I'm curious though, you haven't answered my question. Earlier you said that "men" are the ones who fix society: That's why there are strong, sane, courageous, conservative men to "Man Up!", rally s…
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 06:29 PM
4

Ahhh, le Gatekeeper! On Guard for So-cietahh!! Aren't you the one demanding men to care about society? That's why there are strong, sane, courageous, conservative men to "Man Up!", rally society, and move forward. It's how we get out of the mud. It's how wars are won. So which is it? Do "men" have to "rally society" or not?
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 06:06 PM
21

the threat is minimal I disagree. The entire society, law, and even United Nations are on her side. Even in this case she can lodge a complaint of "sexism" to the boys' school. If you're the headmaster of the school, what choice do you have?
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 05:52 PM
7

With such manly men like you, surely women and feminists can do whatever they like to society. You'll always be there to pick up the pieces anyway!
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 05:49 PM
2

With the rise of China it is likely nations in the future will seek to free themselves from fiat money. Which means we just might get to see if you're right. I doubt that will change feminism at all though. First wave feminism dates back to the 19th century, when most of the world was still on the silver/gold standards. And the basis of feminism, which is chivalry, dates even further back.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 05:39 PM
4

lol fuck doctors who needs 'em am i right
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 05:10 PM
8

That's what this sub is all about. Ahhh yes. We came to MGTOW to learn how to be society's version of a "Man". Yes. That's why we're here. That's why there are strong, sane, courageous, conservative men to "Man Up!", rally society, and move forward. It's how we get out of the mud. It's how wars are won. YES, it IS about men digging down and doing the shit jobs in times of strife You clueless fuck. Keep telling yourself society wants you to rally them. Keep telling yourself you are the Man for th…
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 03:40 PM
4

As a leftist I know. I didn't expect you to spot my sarcasm.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 02:16 PM
8

he just admit he is gynocentric and he don't see how that's an issue. Why you still arguing with him? He probably doesn't even see you as human.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 02:07 PM
5

My apologies, I was under the impression there are non-fiat currencies in our world today. A bit of googling around showed otherwise. Still, I don't think you've made a case on the relationship between fiat money and feminism. I'm not sure what "debt-based'' money has to do with feminism either. Why would a sound monetary system be the death knell of feminism? Simply because no one can effectively operate an income tax system without those workers holding assets that are confiscatable. ? So you'…
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 01:58 PM
11

"Person of the Year 2020: All the women working as nurses" -TIME's Magazine
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 01:49 PM
17

Are you suggesting that the only ones with sane, enlightened views regarding the role of men in society are liberals? Liberals have to pretend to be equal. So at least they won't demand you "Man Up"
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 01:46 PM
10

They have the Secretary General of the UN describing men as violent combatants in their own homes during the "war" against the virus. "I urge all governments to put women's safety first as they respond to the pandemic" Hahahahah they're not even hiding their gynocentrism behind equal-sounding language anymore. It will take a collapse of the fiat monetary system before the tax dollars feeding that beast stops. Even that won't stop it I'm afraid. Feminism is global and active in societies far beyo…
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 12:12 PM
2

Yeah how dare mgtow point out mens' contributions during a crisis without pointing out women's contributions too? Misogynist! 4th wave feminism NOW!
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 12:03 PM
52

As a truck driver I've seen maybe 4 women vs 100s of men so honestly they can shut the fuck up. The simps know that, they just don't care because their goal is to white knight. If women are complaining about "rape culture" and how evil men are, and you pointed out that "there are female rapists too" these same white knights will suddenly realize that "but most rapists are men" and therefore you are just a misogynist trying to derail the conversation.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 11:55 AM
0

Don't tell that to me, tell that to OP
/r/RPChristians06/04/20 11:48 AM
208

"Yeah but there are female truck drivers too so I don't understand your point." -Simps "Yes it is mens' job to do the dirty work. So if you don't do the dirty work you're not a man!" -Conservatives "These men go home and beat their wives!" -Feminists All is well, nothing to see here :) - Every other women
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 10:33 AM
3

It's not men hating themselves, it's AMOGing. Men AMOG by showing women how superior he is to other men. In 2020 this usually looks something like: "I'm a man myself, but why are men soo shiiiiiiiiiit? They're so shit I can't even imagine myself being like them. Seriously, I'm so much better than them" You've probably seen, or done this yourself before. Politicians and pastors in church talk like this pretty much all the time.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 08:29 AM
3

becos we go our own way so we do whatever we want. Some people want to laugh at women. The better question is: Why is mgtow the only ones laughing at women? Something for you to think about.
/r/MGTOW06/04/20 08:19 AM
1

lol wat is a guau
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 12:15 PM
2

You admit (most) women are dishonest and will change reality to suit their own needs. Women are functionally solipsistic. They are hypergamous. They re-write history based on their emotional state; feels is reals. Female leaders are a curse on God's people. Women arethe most responsible teenagers in the house. But all that is great because God made them so! What if women are hypergamous, solipsistic, emotively driven, and flexible in loyalty because they were designed by God to be that way becau…
/r/RPChristians03/04/20 05:30 PM
1

It's funny. Churchians love using Hebrews 10:25 as a means to keep tithe money flowing in modern times. Yet this epistle written to a persecuted people is most appropriate in a time such as this: when millions are being asked to stay at home, "giving up meeting together" and neglecting their "church duties". It wouldn't be so sad if Catholics weren't collaborating with civil authorities to deny their believers of Sacrements. Lol. Expect all denominations to go back to full Heb 10:25 mode once th…
/r/RPChristians03/04/20 03:48 AM
3

how did medieval women let millions of men know that they were attractive? Chivalry
/r/MGTOW26/03/20 08:49 AM
3

Yes, blame men more. Please. It's not like feminists tradcons white knights and all the political commercial and religious industries are already doing that. No. The Manosphere dares to blame women! Gasps. Can't have that.
/r/MGTOW24/03/20 05:34 PM
2

Sure, people are dying. But who cares, right? Gotta take every opportunity to ask men to Man Up!
/r/RPChristians24/03/20 05:14 AM
2

I am experiencing SEVERE insecurity around this issue. We've talked about it a few times. It's like I'm being stabbed in the stomach. My imagination runs wild of these guys going down on her. O.C.R."ONE COC- RULE"
/r/RPChristians23/03/20 06:02 PM
7

Buy everything u can now. Sell when panic is over. You're welcome
/r/RPChristians17/03/20 08:53 AM
0

QUAGBOT LOL
/r/RPChristians16/03/20 01:51 PM
-1

idk man. You sound like a sexist. The thing about leadership is if you want your wife to swallow your load, you need to be a leader and then she'll follow and swallow your load. You can lead by showing her how to do it. But you must also remember that no girl in this world will ever enjoy swallowing a load. I can't imagine anyone swallowing my load. That would be so dehumanizing smh Also, you shall not use your wife for sex, okay? Hold it in. Pray to God for strength. I mean.... okay maybe I can…
/r/RPChristians16/03/20 01:46 PM
-1

? I was responding to /u/mojo-j0j0 He is incredibly right and I completely agree. You need to Man Up and be a leader then your wife will follow and swallow your load. And don't you dare use her for sex okay?
/r/RPChristians16/03/20 01:29 PM
-3

Spot on dude. Man Up so your wife will swallow your load! Stop using her for sex omg gross
/r/RPChristians16/03/20 01:16 PM
2

#MeToo should have put to bed once and for all the delusional idea that feminism is somehow just a big shit test. It isn't, never was.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/20 05:43 PM
1

Most women are fully in favour of men leading the home, as long as you make them feel included and cared for. Don’t be a toxic brute imposing your will, but rather a team leader encouraging your team(wife and kids). Ahhh yes, that's why feminists passed laws to curb men's authority over their wives. That's why women in the last 200 years were so supportive of feminists while they went about destroying men's authority at home - it's because women really want men to lead at home! Poor feminists, s…
/r/RPChristians02/03/20 05:59 PM
1

The proof I submitted was the article’s comments. Talks of sex outside of marriage, unbiblical divorce, and complete lack of grace. So you're saying that the comments on an article is against Scripture, therefore the article is against Scripture? ....Seriously?
/r/RPChristians02/03/20 08:20 AM
1

No one there claimed the rationalmale.com article is against Scripture. Only you made that claim. You can't expect other people to defend a claim they never made. You wanna make a claim that something is "against Scripture" you have to at least elaborate.
/r/RPChristians02/03/20 06:51 AM
9

Yet even your prophet was the head of his house Good job avoiding the question tho
/r/RPChristians02/03/20 06:44 AM
6

Imagine being an inquirer into Christianity. You strut in /r/Christianity ask some questions about the Bible. Next thing you know "You've been banned from participating in Christianity" lol it'd be funny if it weren't so sad
/r/RPChristians02/03/20 06:43 AM
3

DUDE, im in love with that sub.LOL! Check out this hilarious thread man: https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianmarriage/comments/f9n4w6/what_does_winning_your_husband_without_a_word/ 90% of the posts didn't even answer the question LOL
/r/RPChristians01/03/20 08:58 PM
9

Can I just say that the moderators of the Christian Marriage subreddit are the most cucked betas in the entire universe? Just the mods? LOL
/r/RPChristians01/03/20 08:39 PM
3

Please, do elaborate. Explain as clearly as possible why you think that is the case
/r/RPChristians01/03/20 06:59 PM
1

Knowing the Word well is, to me, the first and best defense against Churchianity. Except pastors and priests know the Word best. Yet churchianity flourishes anyway ...Doesn't that make you wonder why?
/r/RPChristians28/02/20 09:09 PM
3

You managed to talk 3,000 words about churchianity without once talking about women. Good job. That takes skill! Can't say I blame you though. Your goal here is to pretend to 'tick off' the churchian crowd, without actually mentioning anything that might tick them off. And you're honest about it: I covered "churchianity" as a concept from an angle that they'd be more apt to identify with than delving into the ways this mentality has allowed culture to influence specific doctrines Without looking…
/r/RPChristians26/02/20 07:30 PM
0

True Christian women are hopefully using their renewed minds in Christ to filter out those deemed attractive by their vagina. ohhhhhh ok but this still means that therefore if a man is popular among True Christian womenTM then chances are he is godlier than others. I don't see why you would disagree.
/r/RPChristians26/02/20 05:16 AM
0

if a man is very popular among "True" Christian girlsTM then chances are he must Godlier, right? "Generally" = not always "chances are" = not always But you do seem to think the holy women's vagina has ability to detect holiness. Or at least the ability to detect unholiness My honest opinion is that most true Christian girls will see your current state and know that you're still immature in the faith. All of those things that made you attractive or were fine to the non-Christian women are filter…
/r/RPChristians25/02/20 05:03 AM
1

"True" Christian girls will generally have a better filter for avoiding attractive bad boys Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I see So that means if a man is very popular among "True" Christian girlsTM then chances are he must Godlier, right?
/r/RPChristians24/02/20 05:51 AM
1

He, she and it are all “ta” This is technically true, yet also misleading because we use different words for each "ta" Even God has His own "ta", which means there are FOUR different "ta"s, one for men, one for women, one for animals and inanimate objects, and one for God/gods Your professor isn't clueless, he is deliberately misleading
/r/RPChristians24/02/20 05:36 AM
4

AWALT. You obviously have low social status in the church, seeing how you're clashing with all the church-going christians here. You want christian girls, you need high status in christian circles. Start by knowing the right people and having friends in right places. Money, favours and connections will help you more than you know. Public speaking skills are a must. Learn how to pray for 10 minutes straight while focusing on your feelings. To be a modern male singer you need alpha looks/vibe + be…
/r/RPChristians23/02/20 06:44 PM
3

Iron sharpens iron. You are either not iron or you do not wish to be sharpened Typical churchian gaslighting technique Present a false dichotomy that both points blame at the other party All while completely ignoring a very obvious 3rd possibility: that the OP doesn't consider the responder to be iron. In fact he probably thinks the responder is nuts. ...That's why people call Christians crazy
/r/RPChristians23/02/20 03:47 PM
2

My honest opinion is that most true Christian girls will see your current state and know that you're still immature in the faith. All of those things that made you attractive or were fine to the non-Christian women are filters for the Christian women. Spot on! The holy vagina sees all. There is no deceiving the clitoris of the Christian woman, the one true barometer of a man's godliness.
/r/RPChristians23/02/20 03:31 PM
1

Chinese doesn't have a common pronoun for he/she. Everyone gets the pronoun "it" (ta) I don't know who told you that but I am 100% sure it is someone who 1) doesn't speak Chinese 2) has sick progressive fantasies of a gender neutral world
/r/RPChristians23/02/20 05:59 AM
15

So when's she getting replaced by a black woman? lol #muhwhitewashing
/r/MGTOW23/02/20 05:54 AM
2

it's a guy who acts and a woman or women who just collapse to the ground shrieking or sobbing This isn't just cowardice. It's female instinct. Even in the cases where the women aren't scared, you won't see her doing anything heroic. She'll just curl up and observe the situation. Her instinct is to survive and let men die if necessary. I've actually made it a habit now to just act scared whenever some confrontation happens around me (but not concerning me). Poor me, I'm just a weak man. Don't loo…
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 09:38 PM
4

What a coincidence, my family is TCR (Traditional Chinese Religion) too While the Bible is certainly 'red pilled', I strongly believe you have to read it without influence from any church or christian organization. Unfortunately, the reality is the modern church has been so feminized that pretty much any church you go to will try their best to make the Bible say something it does not. That includes even Christians who call themselves 'redpilled' TCR is, at the end of the day, atheism trying to b…
/r/RPChristians20/02/20 08:48 PM
2

Are you surprised? Given the amount of hate mgtow receives from feminists and redpillers alike its just a matter of time
/r/RPChristians12/02/20 09:32 PM
7

Public school is largely built to educate girls and break boys to fit the mold. Exactly. Which means sooner or later feminists will seek to make homeschooling illegal. The moral foundation (demonization) necessary to criminalize homeschooling already exists, as you noted. But y'know, as Christians we don't care about all that, ignore it and all would be well.
/r/RPChristians02/02/20 07:06 PM
3

Scripture has all the answers you need. Never trust the christians who take the opportunity to preach when Scripture has simple answers to your questions
/r/RPChristians31/01/20 03:22 AM
2

Matthew 10:16
/r/RPChristians30/01/20 08:16 PM
2

Spot on! Man Up and all would be well.
/r/RPChristians23/01/20 09:30 PM
1

Do not be so naive to think this is a case of Indonesia enforcing religious values. Indonesia's current government is very leftist, even by Western standards. Sex-negative feminists in Indonesia have been pushing for years for laws to lynch alphas successful in their craft (and not wifeing women, how dare they), this is simply the conclusion of their hard work. Of course they need to dress this up as religious BS by also supposedly criminalizing abortion, what you don't hear is how this will be …
/r/askRPC22/01/20 01:17 PM
5

"Traditionalism" is an empty word, it means nothing and society won't magically fix itself just by going traditional. The word you're looking for is "Patriarchal" - father rule. To achieve Patriarchy, 2 essential things must happen: 1) Fathers must have legal authority to rule over his family 2) Sons must be the only heirs to the fathers' estate, hence cementing the patrilineal family. Without these 2 changes, your "traditionalism" means nothing. Nuclear family or not won't make a difference. Gi…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/01/20 12:48 PM
1

They are too few in number anymore to exert any power and influence over men collectively, and that power will remain out of their hands until the majority of women start to say "no" to Chad and "yes" to Good Men. I'm not sure if you're naive or what.... but dude we live in a de facto matriarchy. Do you really think there is a situation where even some women have no power over society? The "good women" in your hypothetical situation will simply band together and form "unions" (womens rights grou…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/01/20 12:31 PM
2

I once slept with a guy I really like who left me in the morning. Did I get mad? No. Did the guy owe me anything? Absolutely not. I made great memories! If you think men owe you anything after sex, you're trash! He doesn't owe you anything.
/r/MGTOW26/11/19 02:48 PM
2

If there's any thing about a womens' divorce she doesn't say, then chances are she completely dominated her husband in that specific area. So in this case, since she only spoke about "50/50 split", which I'm guessing refers to custody of children and division of assets. What she didn't mention is whether or not any party had to pay alimony. So chances are, her ex-husband was ordered to pay her a shit ton of alimony payments. If she really did not receive any alimony payments whatsoever then you …
/r/MGTOW26/11/19 10:19 AM
14

The women constantly complain about the state of their bathrooms, to the extent of this woman's comments. It gets so bad when they start saying what's happening I don't even want to hear it. its funny cos when things go wrong womens' first instinct is to blame men. Yet they can't do that here cos it's the freakin' woman's bathroom lol
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 08:16 PM
21

Whatever modern society says about men and women, the complete opposite is always true and will always be ancient wisdom throughout history. Modern: Mother knows best Truth: Father knows best, patriarchy is the only way Modern: Women are better at empathy Truth: Men are better at empathy. Women are incapable of having empathy on anyone or anything not a women, a child or a cute furry animal. Modern: Women are the fairer sex Truth: Men are the fairer sex. Womens' sense of righteousness is complet…
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 08:13 PM
3

feminist territorial marking: https://dalrock.wordpress.com/category/feminist-territory-marking/
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 07:40 PM
1

the minute these websites stop becoming ghost towns is the minute they become compromised. The core issue is that misandry is in every corner of society, if misandric people migrated to Bitchute or whatever they would just carry their misandry along with them.
/r/MGTOW21/11/19 03:16 PM
1

No
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 05:45 AM
2

It is ok to want to be with someone beyond “needing” someone to only satisfy your own urges. True, but he would be better off single if he can stay pure till his 20s/30s when he won't be as horny. Not according to me, but according to the Bible (1 Cor 7) And waiting till you know yourself and the type of woman you want to marry sounds better than rushing such a serious thing. Sounds better according to you? Or according to the Bible? Controlling those impulses is so much less painful than a roug…
/r/RPChristians15/11/19 03:45 PM
0

he wants to make sure he's at least somewhat ready and mature enough to handle the inevitable challenges that marriage presents. Like I said, these are your requirements. Not Biblical prerequisites for marriage. You cannot say this and then pretend to be giving Biblical advice. In this case, telling OP to wait = telling OP to burn with passion. So in this case your personal advice is opposing Biblical instruction. So OP will have to find a balance between spiritual maturity and temptation But th…
/r/RPChristians15/11/19 03:34 PM
5

Impulse control is very difficult at your age. But this is exactly why /u/Long_Duty needs marriage, now. Or as soon as it's legal for him to do so. It is good for a man not to touch a woman. 2 Nevertheless, because of sexual immorality, let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband. 3 Let the husband render to his wife the affection due her, and likewise also the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewis…
/r/RPChristians15/11/19 06:25 AM
13

Well our last date we were just chilling on the couch and watching a Netflix show. ................. bruh
/r/RPChristians14/11/19 07:41 AM
1

I tried putting myself in the shoes of a churchian. If I am one, what evidence would it take to convince me the church is unfairly demonizing men/porn? Obviously, the answer is: nothing. Nothing can convince a churchian of this. So any evidence we collect should be with the goal of simply making a scientific argument to convince "neutrals" (non-christians and non-church going christians) that the church is unfairly demonizing porn and men. With this goal in mind, the data-collection process just…
/r/RPChristians13/11/19 09:07 AM
1

Now (interpret this however you will) but this is perhaps the first time I read from you something that might actually disrupt the status quo in the church, if more people read it. However, your strongest point here is also your biggest weakness: They just have sinfully denying wives. The majority of men I meet have no problem saying no to porn within 48 hours after having sex with their wife (i.e. the time it takes for his balls to refuel completely). If they're at all close to a representative…
/r/RPChristians10/11/19 07:27 PM
1

I don't think I've ever seen a woman voting for drafting men. But they know it's happening, and it if it were women they would be up in arms in revolt. You know this is true. Women have no excuse on grounds of ignorance. And for all the others, I suspect that the number of males supporting this is somewhat equal to the number of women supporting it. And you would be right... partially. Centuries of Chivalry (made popular by the West*) and the urge to AMOG other men have taught modern men to push…
/r/TheRedPill10/11/19 06:55 AM
1

the ones that do only do so by peer pressure or have a clear reason to, just like women. But history has shown that once given the opportunity, women seek to cast aside responsibility (abortion, no fault divorce, child support) and will seek to retain and/or maximize their unearned benefits (alimony, drafting men, removing of due process from men). The same cannot be said for men and patriarchal societies, whom has not shirked their responsibilities for thousands of years. most men raised today …
/r/TheRedPill10/11/19 04:50 AM
2

Without things like TRP or a traditionalist society, men don't take responsibility either. humansockpuppet already responded to this point. Men can be taught to take responsibility, and I will add that men will take responsibility willingly when the incentives to do so are worth it. Example: men will marry again (taking charge and be responsible for a wife) when the incentives to do so are worth it. Women will never take responsibility because it goes against her instincts. Only traditionalist s…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/19 08:50 PM
7

then why do you have guys wanting a traditionalist society? because only a "traditionalist" society can force women to take responsibility
/r/TheRedPill09/11/19 05:25 PM
4

Spot on. If accused in Spain, just get jacked af! All would be well!
/r/TheRedPill09/11/19 11:57 AM
2

I understand women have their own problems , but ... how fucking hard it is to understand they aren't solving anything with this kind of stuff? Sounds like you're a feminist yourself. You're just unhappy feminism "got out of hand"
/r/TheRedPill09/11/19 11:54 AM
1

I became angry when my wife didn't respond to me the way I wanted her to. Now, I see that it was clearly my fault. Well done! Now you're ready to be a pastor!
/r/RPChristians08/11/19 06:44 PM
0

And when a woman does it it's called ... a shit test. Yes because banter = shit test now This place is turning into blue pill hell
/r/TheRedPill31/10/19 09:37 AM
1

Spot on! Man Up and all will be well!
/r/TheRedPill30/10/19 07:52 PM
2

Exactly. The descent of TRP from 2013 to now has been breathtaking to watch. That it is GLO who said this now... just can't make this up. Now that even TRP agree "redpill is a guide for sewer-men to fuck sewer sluts in the sewer." Feminists and tradcons now have all the ammo they need to destroy this place once and for all. After all, TRP makes sewer men. And only works on sewer women! Non-sewer women likes non-sewer men and therefore TRP is toxic for making sewer people. 100% blue pill rational…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/19 07:52 PM
0

There are 2 "awakenings" Man has to learn in his life with regards to women. One is to learn what women have become. Two is to learn what a godly woman who puts her flesh to death daily really looks like (what she can become). IMO it's clear you have only been through the former
/r/RPChristians07/10/19 10:21 PM
2

i know, and eventually I overcame that 'wall'. It can be overcome, if it isn't then it becomes your wall, that's the point. Men's wall is in his head. so not sure why downboated but i guess that's reddit these days
/r/TheRedPill06/10/19 06:04 PM
-1

mens' wall is whatever age they find themselves creepy. At 25 I found myself creepy for dating an 18 year old, that was my wall. And women can feel your insecurity, hence a "wall". It's something you have to overcome, and it won't be easy becos all of society will scream at you if you go against the FI
/r/TheRedPill06/10/19 08:54 AM
2

This is very interesting if you consider that it is women who are completely unable to have empathy on low value, or "creepy" men. Or just about any men considered "beta". Our laws today reflect that, and is proof of just how much our world has descended from a patriarchal society to a matriarchal one. Feminism really does invert everything it touches
/r/TheRedPill04/10/19 10:09 AM
1

I encourage you to write up a post! I like how you just ignored the part about being more charitable to men
/r/RPChristians27/09/19 09:43 AM
4

It's not so much that vetting "doesn't work". The biggest criticism(s) is that women's "Game" revolves entirely around men looking to "vet" them. She comes prepared. She knows you're looking to vet her. The closer she is to the Wall the better she is at this Game. But instead of teaching men specifically how to counter womens' Game, conservatives/complementarians instead choose to blame the men when his vetting fails. Hence there is now a lot of baggage whenever the concept of "vetting" is discu…
/r/RPChristians27/09/19 05:59 AM
1

The part about being "Christ-like/humble/meek" is a little joke. The church loves to gaslight good men using these weasel words to guilt-trip ("convict") them. I was hoping you would spot this but, apparently, it "convicted" you too.... so....... hahahsorry..... ._.
/r/RPChristians13/09/19 09:50 PM
2

Idk dude. If i were running a religious online community for a minority-and-oppressed idealogy (aka "red pill"), and I just watched a movie whose producers had a reputation for making heretical films disguised as my religion.... and I found this new movie produced by the same producers to be actually good (aka I agree with it's values).... Then my priorities should be to: 1) demonstrate just how surprised I am that I like this new movie 2) warn the believers in my little online community about t…
/r/RPChristians13/09/19 09:04 PM
3

"> https://www.christianpost.com/news/kendrick-brothers-movie-overcomer-based-on-finding-identity-in-god-stars-priscilla-shirer.html COLUMBUS, Ga. — The Kendrick Brothers wrapped up filming their new movie “Overcomer” last week and the faith-based drama will feature strong female lead characters played by Priscilla Shirer and Shari Rigby. I am so glad you managed to find a positive message from a frickin' Kendrick film (like the 99% of Christians out there) but really dude... don't you think it …
/r/RPChristians13/09/19 07:44 PM
1

hell yeah
/r/RPChristians26/08/19 09:56 PM
2

"Man's curiosity is something quite different. His desire for knowledge has no personal implications, is purely objective and, in the long run, is much more practical than a woman's attitude." "If they make any attempt to come to conclusions on the subject, they are forced to rely to a large extent on the information women volunteer to them. And since women have no respect for exact scientific data and are interested only in what is of immediate benefit to them, they will say what seems to be co…
/r/RPChristians26/08/19 09:13 PM
2

Also worth noticing, 30+ upvotes, which is way above the standard on this sub but only 2 comments. IOW "i agree but its not toeing the partyline so i wont comment to actually voice my feedback". How RP of you all. ...Or, maybe becos it's just another bunch of observations that technically aren't wrong, but knowing them won't change the way things run in the church either. Not sure what comment you're looking for. We ¢an talk h€re until Kingdom ¢om€$, the ¢hur¢h will ¢ontinu€ to run as it alway$ …
/r/RPChristians30/07/19 09:43 PM
1

grabs popcorn
/r/RPChristians27/07/19 05:57 PM
1

No one made any "personal attacks" against the OP but that's what he assumed in his comment. No one said he was "angry" or "frustrated." If the OP wanted to reasonably post and argue the merits of singleness or merits of relationships and marriage he would have replied to people discussing these points. It's unwise to discuss things with people determined to make things personal. Even more unwise when there are mods like you willing to turn a blind eye to the blatant diversion tactics and ad hom…
/r/RPChristians06/06/19 04:39 PM
1

but over this past year or so it's become clear to me that with the social dynamic's often in place it's best to forgo trying to convince people that stump on you and sling personal insults. Indeed. My flair here is partly a result too of naivete. Thankfully, online reputation counts for nothing, but the point is this is just one of many ways modern Christians deal with dissenters in real life. . Also a number of white knights came in more concerned with defending women It's one thing to oppose …
/r/RPChristians05/06/19 06:25 AM
1

This sub pretends not to recommend marriage, so as to align with 1 Cor 7 on paper, but then stomps on all mgtow content while upvoting/endorses Marriedredpill material. It's quite brilliant what they're doing, when challenged they can do the whole "WhEn dId wE eVeR rEc0mM3nding marriage??!!!?!" but actions speak louder than words. Yet another example of Christian hypocrisy, visit your local church if you like this kinda thing. The only fault in your post was accusing this sub of "recommending ma…
/r/RPChristians04/06/19 08:16 PM
2

And finding a Christian wife in a community with low rates of divorce is the best way to ensure you don’t get divorce raped. Spot on! Remember too, hooking up with criminals with low rates of crime is the best way to ensure you don't get raped. Genius! If you master the social skills of RP and have Christian ideals about marriage (perseverance, respect, love), you will be able to have a happy marriage probably with 80% of the people out there. LOL. OKAYYYYYYYYY UPVOTED 11 TIMES WITHIN IN A DAY T…
/r/RPChristians04/06/19 07:37 PM
1

What i actually see God doing is drawing a massive line on this issue, and basically allowing many women, post wall, into their 30's basically begging God for a husband Elaborate pls? You believe God is allowing post wall women begging for husbands to do what?
/r/RPChristians01/06/19 07:10 PM
3

Some "red pill" people once said: If she ever says she's been raped, next. Either she's lying about it or she isn't. If it's a lie, she's a ticking time bomb with the capability and the willingness to distort her version of reality in order to destroy your life, and society will stand by her as she does so. If it's not a lie, then she has bigger emotional issues and baggage you're not capable of handling, and you don't want to handle them either. There's more fish out there. Either way, next.
/r/RPChristians01/06/19 06:16 PM
1

my social life and financial life do not depend on my views You're incredibly naive if you think your social life and finances are the only things at stake. But hey, whatever helps you puff your chest out... your loss EDIT: on 2nd thought, judging by how much you love lecturing men via your instagram posts (do you really need IG to do that? lol) I'd say you're actually very in line with mainstream culture. So no worries.
/r/RPChristians19/05/19 04:24 PM
2

OP wrote: “Why let women with the heart, self discipline and solipsism of a kid to have that powerful dynamite called voting in their hands.” There is an assumed theological proposition in that statement: Namely that women have an immature and relatively underdeveloped character with regard to self-discipline and preferring others. Either way, this statement is a profound anthropological claim which has been wholly overlooked in all of the comments presently on this post. Inasmuch as it claims t…
/r/RPChristians03/05/19 06:19 PM
1

Point and sputter is below you, come on
/r/RPChristians03/05/19 06:04 PM
1

I wasn't referring to you haha I meant all women always know how the world works, and always know how to exert her will on others. So the excuse that men caused feminism is an naive one, and frankly a very cowardly one as well. Men who say that almost always refuse to hold women solely responsible for many other things in life as well, and you can bet they will be the first to AMOG or gaslight other men.
/r/RPChristians03/05/19 07:16 AM
0

checks post history "we"?
/r/RPChristians02/05/19 04:16 PM
4

There is no "theology" when it comes to women voters because there is no "theology" on democracy. You can make a case against democracy using the Bible, but that won't have anything to do with "redpill" thought. You can change your question to: "Does this sub believe women should hold political power?" but that's another another topic entirely with it's own separate definitions that will no doubt lead to other questions and other cans-of-worms being opened (monarchy, theocracy, etc) so....
/r/RPChristians02/05/19 04:12 PM
-2

Great, now we're talking about "credibility"! See what a great deflection that was? This thread is about how to take womens' votes away, a highly uncomfortable topic to some. So let's keep it at that.
/r/RPChristians02/05/19 03:51 PM
-1

This is ludicrous. People will always need to buy clothes, food, etc. Even at its best, feminism couldn't undermine the value of human entertainment and the way that people will compromise their values to keep spending money on going to the movies, buying TVs, eating out at restaurants, having nice furniture, etc. Again, don't overstate your position - this loses lots of credibility. MeToo taught you nothing yet? And what's with the snark?: Again, don't overstate your position - this loses lots …
/r/RPChristians02/05/19 03:39 PM
1

Women just don't need beta buxes the way they used to, so some men who don't have anything more to offer are getting left out in the cold. Hear, hear! The women knows how the world works. She always does. Women know the world is the way it is today because she wants it to be this way. Had she not wanted it to be this way, men would never be deceived by her idiotic idealogies. They don't even hide it! But you men are still in slumber.
/r/RPChristians02/05/19 03:22 PM
1

To give incentives for the traditional model. Indeed, and one of the ways Christians can do this is to hold Christian women responsible for feminism, and to call them to repentance. That way the church can be a light upon a hill in a dark feminist world, and Christ is glorified! If women can boycott products, red pill men can boycott women. Correct! MGTOW is the 2nd way the church can respond effectively! :) And where words don't work, overcome with power. Yes!!! Force is the last resort, and th…
/r/RPChristians02/05/19 03:08 PM
2

Yes money is power. If women don't get to vote, men will vote manly laws. Because politicians won't have to appeal to the female audience. Politicians have to eat too. Women are the top consumers. One boycott of any industry of their choosing is enough to cripple any politician. If votes worked, Mexico wouldn't be infested by drug cartels. Speaking of which, why do drug cartels sell drugs??? Hint: $$$$$ Why has Mexican/(whichever South American country) votes been so ineffective at fighting the …
/r/RPChristians01/05/19 05:15 PM
5

The good news is that if you are a masculine man who owns his stuff and chooses his partner carefully, this won't be a problem for you in your home. "Man Up and all will be well!!"
/r/RPChristians01/05/19 05:02 PM
8

I used to think taking the vote away from women is the solution, but then I got older I learnt how power works. I've basically come to the conclusion votes or not, it won't make any difference. To begin though, let me start by asking you: Why is it that "feminism" (or specifically, the destruction of Patriarchal family system) exploded onto the Western world all at once in the 19th century, 20th century for Asian countries, and why did they all happen to perfectly coincide with the Industrial Re…
/r/RPChristians01/05/19 04:49 PM
6

Yes. Finally someone connected the dots! Unfortunately sin happened, and so 1 Cor 7 is the new wise thing to do. And even that's before feminism/chivalry wreaked havoc on everything we know. And that's why MGTOW hurts women more than men. EDIT: And that's why so many "redpilled" men fear MGTOW like the plague lol
/r/RPChristians30/03/19 08:25 AM
2

both my parents are mega church pastors Here's something that "The Church Impotent" didn't cover: Since when did God say the church can be treated as hereditary property?
/r/RPChristians17/03/19 04:34 PM
1

When I say counselor I mean marriage counsellor. Both my wife and I. Why? Because my wife won't hear my criticism of her...I need a 3rd party. If she won't listen to you I doubt she'll listen to a counsellor telling her to submit. Besides, counsellors need to make a living. They'll do everything in their power to not offend women (just like the pastors) so I doubt this will turn out in your favour. But of course, I would love to be proven wrong! No, i am not married bro :)
/r/RPChristians04/03/19 12:09 PM
1

From memory he took issue with the statement "men and women are of equal value but have different roles". I agree with that statement...I don't see the issue. The issue is that both the Bible and our culture already has a word for it. The Bible calls it "headship", our society calls it "Patriarchy". Why would Complementarians need a new word to describe a "movement" that already exists? The reason, of course, is to not be associated with Patriarchy so that feminists don't hunt them down. The big…
/r/RPChristians27/02/19 02:17 PM
2

Oh dear
/r/RPChristians26/02/19 03:17 PM
1

Sure. Dalrock explains it better than I can. (You know Dalrock? You should!) Complementarian: https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2016/01/30/supplicating-to-rebellion/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2016/03/22/complementarian-marriage-egalitarian-marriage-with-a-veneer-of-headship/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/category/complementarian/ "servant leadership": https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/servant-leaders-mind-their-own-business/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2017/05/24/servant-leadership-in-t…
/r/RPChristians26/02/19 11:39 AM
2

You shouldn't approach these topics from the "I've never met a church that doesn't do this!" angle. The churchian will simply point to the good teaching and demand you turn a blind eye on the bad ones. As Sea is still doing... Rather, point out that the fact that bad teaching exists, however small number or minority they might be, and be very clear how dangerous said false teaching is. Then demand the churchian to make his stand. If he still chooses to dance around the issue (if it's gender issu…
/r/RPChristians25/02/19 11:19 AM
2

Using that reasoning, I could say that THE CHURCH teaches that Barack Obama is the anti-Christ, charismatic Christians are probably going to hell, and that Bitcoin is the Mark of the Beast. And not only that, these writers are having their works attacked from an angle they likely never imagined or thought they'd be attacked from. But if any modern Christian tried that, within days there will be countless responses against him, rebuking him for his false teaching. No one will care what his "inten…
/r/RPChristians24/02/19 04:32 PM
2

Uhhh, congrats? You've just proved what Red already said in the OP: To be clear: every church recognize that we should care for our own bodies. Everyone is on the same age: we are God's temple, so care for your own body. The issue isn't how much we care about our own physique, but whether or not it's okay to have any concern for the attractiveness of our (potential) spouse. That's where the problems arise. There's always a communication gap between what is said and what is heard. "You should car…
/r/RPChristians24/02/19 07:15 AM
2

/u/SeaRegion is doing the classic churchian maneuver on you and you fell hard for it lol. Allow me to now humbly show you how the Churchian Shimmy works. First, you start with an opening that EVERYONE can agree with: But ideally you should pursue romantic relationships with those who you find attractive. A statement that says absolutely nothing is the best. That way you offend no one. Notice too how thoroughly vague this statement is. So what is it that most men or women are attracted to? What i…
/r/RPChristians22/02/19 12:52 PM
4

Why see it as games? Why not just tell her to grow up and knock it the hell off. I don't want to have to play 3D psychological chess with my wife See? You got it!
/r/RPChristians17/02/19 05:39 AM
1

Very chivalrous!
/r/RPChristians11/02/19 07:58 PM
1

Servant Leadership Husband must love as Christ loved the Church but it doesn't really say wives need to "submit" we are just going to ignore all that to avoid offending the contributors (women) women are allowed to speak before the Closing Prayer to give announcements and activity updates but that is as far as they have gone. So far. Women are not allowed to teach men over the age of accountability. That's a complementarian church. They're not gonna hear anything u say
/r/RPChristians05/02/19 06:15 AM
3

Church of Christ ordains women. Right? There's zero chance they'll hear anything you say. I wish more Christians understand this: modern pastors are picked solely based on charisma and ability to "navigate difficult situations" (i.e. not offend women). Not "spiritual maturity" or whatever other BS they tell you. Seriously, if I told you that company CEOs, politicians or any other leaders of other industries are picked not based on merit, but on connections, charisma or social skill(s), you would…
/r/RPChristians04/02/19 07:53 AM
1

What is the Christian RP Advice to a Wife for Getting Her Husband to Change? 1 Peter 3:1-6
/r/RPChristians18/01/19 09:08 AM
3

but good and healthy women can and have overcome. So you're telling me that these "good and healthy women" knows about their flaws, and are actively working to curb said flaws? And what happens if/when she one day decides not to? If you're redpilled properly you should know that women are not evil, it's worst: they are emotional. Today she really really truly loves you. Tomorrow she really really truly hates you. In the past it didn't matter during the days she hates you: there's nothing she can…
/r/askTRP25/12/18 07:13 PM
4

Don't forget the legal climate. Now that "marital rape" is a thing, and #MeToo also exists, how long before #WivesToo is also a thing?
/r/askTRP25/12/18 06:58 PM
1

feminist rebellion is another side of the coin to be looked at, but you don't need to go after that initially to start working on being masculine. Like I said, Christians urging men to be "masculine" (Man Up) is an everyday occurance. Yet Christian men continue being effeminate because the underlying cause has not been addressed. So perhaps your statement here is not accurate.
/r/RPChristians16/12/18 10:38 AM
1

All of this is to say: Did he have a change of heart in the past year or two? How so? Everything in his latest article can be written by a Complementarian. In his fantasy world, Christian women are being blamed for men failing to Man Up: Consequently, women are often blamed for men failing to grow into men for failing to challenge men. This is of course only imaginable in the mind of an effeminate man who defers responsibility. He then spends the entire article being mostly correct describing th…
/r/RPChristians15/12/18 09:28 PM
6

You can get away with not hiring women, for now. But all it takes is one quota or law passed and you're back to being screwed. Only men, in his infinite ego, can convince himself he can outsmart the State; while labeling others "young and delusional" for pointing out feminist oppression! It's AMOG-ing, and it's one of the many reasons feminism keeps winning.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/18 09:40 PM
1

what wonderful times we live in
/r/askTRP08/12/18 01:13 PM
7

And do you really think there will be no backlash against the backlash? This is oppression. Stop deluding yourselves. Acknowledging you are a slave is the first step towards any sort of change.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/18 01:05 PM
1

This is pure fantasy, no one cares about men. If #MeToo causes a backlash, it's because women are suffering. No one cares about men. Until a patriarchal religion becomes mainstream and teaches us to love other men as brothers and not as competition, the red pill will never become mainstream.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/18 05:29 PM
2

And here I thought feminists love no-fault divorce
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/18 04:47 PM
10

No Hymen no diamond FTFY
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/18 04:37 PM
10

Does anyone feel sorry for a guy if he __________ No. Fill in the blank with whatever you like, answer's still no.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/10/18 09:43 AM
14

"willing to ANYTHING for me"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/18 04:25 AM
2

feminism is founded upon envy and an inexplicable desire to never be grateful to a man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/10/18 06:37 PM
3

this attempt at politicization is what will get this subreddit shut down discuss this topic like adults or fcuk off. So which is it? Do we discuss this political topic or not?
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 09:50 PM
4

I mean, there's always that one guy (or gal) who will rape anybody. For him, sure rape could be about power and less about sex. We know what goes on behind prison bars too. The problem is feminists seize on these outliers to build a BS doctrine where all forced sex isn't actually about sex. It's the only way femcels can convince themselves they are potentially rape targets.
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 04:08 PM
41

STAHP I CAN ONLY GET SO ERECT
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 01:35 PM
5

r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
/r/MGTOW01/10/18 02:02 AM
5

MEN DO NOT HAVE TO: Marry you! 😂😂
/r/MGTOW26/09/18 08:37 PM
1

You still don't get it, it's not about whether it's sexual harassment or not. It's the fact that she can accuse you of whatever she likes, and the world will believe her.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/18 08:41 AM
2

If I'm the genie I will make the bosses miraculously pay women as much as men. With higher pay comes higher expected work output, and the women will quit their jobs which will in turn create the supposed "wage gap" all over again. But hey I did what you asked ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ you have 2 wishes left
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 04:59 AM
13

"This is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth, And says, “I have done no wickedness.”" -Proverbs 30:20 "Though I have searched repeatedly, I have not found what I was looking for. Only one out of a thousand men is virtuous, but not one woman!" - Ecclesiastes 7:28
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 04:50 AM
1

Ooohh let me guess: they're gonna get all the problems right, but somehow end up blaming men!
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 04:43 AM
9

Does he even lift? No? See, he needs to Man Up. Look at me I lift. Clearly the solution is to Man Up and not for laws to prevent witch hunts.
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 04:38 AM
5

All women see men this way, they don't think men have anything worthwhile to say. Men exists only to feed her shelter her, and/or make her laugh and make her wet. If only all women are as honest as this one.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 05:11 PM
3

if Indian women are a little bit like Jewish and Black ones - higher T makes sense, i know one of indian girls' biggest insecurity is to be called "hairy"
/r/MGTOW19/09/18 01:46 PM
11

One of the biggest red pills of my life is learning just how feminist India really is
/r/MGTOW18/09/18 08:30 PM
0

AFs may or may not participate in hierarchies; it's irrelevant. They DGAF about the hierarchies and that's what draws women to them
/r/TheRedPill18/09/18 04:02 PM
1

You are describing AF /u/tempolaca is describing BB
/r/TheRedPill18/09/18 03:39 PM
6

Jordan Peterson is the secular equivalent of christian complementarians their job is to play controlled opposition to bluepill/feminist thought
/r/TheRedPill18/09/18 03:34 PM
1

Pook mentioned he's Texan. Only thing about himself he told us
/r/TheRedPill15/09/18 06:46 PM
12

what
/r/MGTOW27/08/18 12:41 AM
4

They actually love it when you explode after they've shaken you up for weeks or months. They love it when you yell and break some shit, they love that primal fear they feel, knowing that you are a beast capable of destroying her. Yep, women know exactly how to push your buttons with maximum plausible deniability. Good news is, that's a skill we can learn too.
/r/MGTOW26/08/18 11:29 PM
1

Yep. "Liberals", "conservatives" are all just different ways for feminists to gain more power (whether or not they call themselves feminists). A truly male-friendly political party has yet to exist. Except perhaps Shariah law.
/r/MGTOW25/08/18 03:07 PM
2

yep prostitution won't change anything. It would make things slightly better for men - which is enough reason for society to ban it. But even prostitutes can weave spells over men and make them believe in "love". Seeing women for who they are is the only solution
/r/MGTOW25/08/18 03:04 PM
8

username checks out
/r/MGTOW24/08/18 07:39 AM
13

There is no way in hell this gynocentric world will let this pass, don't kid yourselves.
/r/MGTOW24/08/18 07:38 AM
2

Exactly. You know times are bad when even MGTOW agrees with feminist ideas. We're talking about a 'boy' who would be legal for sex in 39 out of 50 states in the US. Apparently, because sex happened in one of the 11 remaining states where age of consent is 18 means this suddenly becomes "pedophilia", which means the "pedophile" is also a child-molester who should be killed/hunted down/skinned alive/tortured/raped without mercy in prison for the rest of his days. People today forget what the word …
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 11:58 PM
0

This guy gets it. The current feminist status quo is unsustainable in the long run and it's collapse is inevitable. The worst case scenario for us is if men didn't learn their lesson (or if women somehow make men forget the lesson of feminism). The good news is, the best case scenario is exactly what's happening now.
/r/MGTOW22/08/18 09:57 AM
1

that applies to you too mate
/r/RPChristians22/08/18 09:37 AM
3

Being actually red pilled would be a good start
/r/RPChristians21/08/18 10:21 PM
1

The blue thing? But even the simplest harmonic field is composed of entirely... Wait just a moment. The blue thing. Yes, yes, yes! I can see your point. Draw out the necessary energies using a Jarol Apparatus! But wait. What about soul reversal? You must be aware of the consequences when using the apparatus near an open magic field. Seven. Astonishing. I hadn't considered that. I mean, it would take months... years to work out the differentials. But what a revolutionary concept. Wait, wait. I ca…
/r/RPChristians18/08/18 09:10 AM
0

This type of subject, while not our main focus So perhaps it's time there be a sub that actually cares I mean, focus on "this type of subject"
/r/RPChristians10/08/18 11:29 PM
0

relevant: https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/does-your-church-measure-divorce/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2010/12/17/list-of-churches-which-have-taken-concrete-action-on-divorce/
/r/RPChristians10/08/18 09:47 PM
3

Therefore American culture became feminised. It was the point when American culture became irreversibly feminised, yes. Because now the politicians will have to cater to women as well. But there's also much evidence that Western/Christian culture has already been feminised in various ways before that. "The Church Impotent" by Leon J Podles details this process.
/r/RPChristians10/08/18 09:42 PM
2

I posted this [black arm band post] in /truechristian and it disappeared in 10 minutes Yeah, typical Churchians. Talk the good talk "we stand against feminism too!" the minute you suggest an actual course of action watch their faces turn white
/r/RPChristians10/08/18 09:31 PM
2

why 1920? I think it started in 1848
/r/RPChristians10/08/18 07:55 PM
8

#MeToo is the best thing that could have happened. Never in our wildest dreams could we have thought feminists would shoot themselves in the foot in such an astronomically stupid way. The conservative "traditional" feminists know this, and they are terrified. They have since spent millions of dollars making "Women will get hurt too!/This is too much!" articles, talkshows etc. in an attempt to damage control. We need to pray that they fail.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 05:18 PM
2

and somehow they managed to convince the world that men have higher sex drives. Only a beta believes that. It's actually quite impressive how women always manage to spin the social narrative in her favour.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 05:03 PM
11

You're just afraid of gravity.
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 06:21 PM
23

If you are a REAL SHEEP you jump down that cliff!
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 06:05 PM
35

What an angry, miserable sheep. Sheep Up!
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 05:34 PM
3

They don't even know men well. Men will "Man Up!" (as defined by the World) when the incentives are good enough. No amount of shaming/guilt-trip can cover up a raw deal.
/r/RPChristians09/08/18 07:45 AM
1

It's your typical trad-con "Man Up and all will be well!" video, but it's a great video to separate the wheat from the chaff within the manosphere. Over at Dalrock's comment section now the "chaff" are separating themselves already. Time to grab some popcorn
/r/RPChristians09/08/18 07:31 AM
3

Actually these images are great. We've seen how effective the "agree and amplify" memes from the Right are
/r/MGTOW08/08/18 08:09 AM
1

If one can provide a strong biblical basis for enforcing headship via physical means, I'm all ears. Rather than a lack of balls, it's a lack of evidence. Actually, I was implying in my previous comment that political revolution is the only way to restore patriarchy. As demonstrated in the above link. Everything else is beating around the bush. But that's technically another discussion altogether...
/r/RPChristians30/07/18 05:25 AM
1

Then why didn't any of you agree with the OP? OP didn't even ask for help! OP started a philosophical thread, with a very philosophical topic. Instead this sub flooded with now 70+ comments of ways to cover up the cracks. Is it some fear of criticizing marriage? OP says "Modern marriage is a paradox." Go through all the top comments, all of them are in the structure of "No you're wrong! You can do this this or this..." Why? Did he ask for help? Again, it doesn't mean your responses are wrong. Bu…
/r/RPChristians29/07/18 09:08 PM
1

2/2 In previous comments you mentioned that Jesus is a fine example of your "leadership" model because he gives consequences to people who don't obey him. but He can sure make you wish you had! However you also said that leadership does not require the means to enforce it. Leadership doesn't require the means to enforce it. This is contradictory. Coercion is 90% enforcing power via consequences. coercion noun the action or practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.…
/r/RPChristians29/07/18 05:26 PM
1

By now, you should clearly know my position on headship and it's applications, Actually, I still don't. Or at least I still have not seen or heard you say anything about a husband's authority and what it looks like to you. But then further on you said this: and we've already discussed ways to exercise that headship or power and discipline her. Meaning you think you already described "headship" in detail! Or at least what that means to you. So I guess I have to look at your past replies to see wh…
/r/RPChristians29/07/18 05:26 PM
1

Some are already working on that, bro. Larger scale stuff. Who? I answered your questions on a separate comment (both your comments are identical, really) and summarized why the OP is right that husbands today have no authority. This comment will focus on your trivial attitude towards patriarchy. Patriarchy! Yeah, that helps :) Yes, patriarchy is the only answer. It should be your end goal. "Patriarchy" as in a society where husbands actually have authority over their families, legally empowered…
/r/RPChristians26/07/18 08:44 AM
1

Whit, no one is changing the topic, except for you when you completely disregarded answering my on-topic question directed at you. Perhaps you can't answer it. Or won't. I don't know. What question? I don't see any "question". I see attempt after attempt to reframe Biblical authority into a discussion of "So what are you gonna do about it?" Are you suggesting that if a wife refuses her husband's leadership in an area, she be made to follow him devoid of the means used to make her? Or if you limi…
/r/RPChristians26/07/18 08:02 AM
1

You and others seem to suggest something more. What is the 'more' you think should be done? Patriarchy. If a wife doesn't submit to her husband, what means (within biblical parameters) do you think her husband should employ in exercising his headship over her? “So what are you going to do about it?” https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/dont-be-tricked-into-responding-to-a-reframe-with-an-intellectual-argument/ The most common argument against the Scripture in question focuses on “So what are…
/r/RPChristians26/07/18 04:47 AM
1

Understand that marriage is the only relationship where you are called to lead but have no means of enforcing consequences OP was talking about authority, or rather the lackof. Stop trying to change the topic. Such as in Colossians 3:18 "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands" Notice in this verse the wives are to do this on their own, they are not being made to do so. Incredible. You just turned a command demanding wives submit, into a command demanding husbands never exercise authorit…
/r/RPChristians26/07/18 04:31 AM
1

Some examples of these types of consequences are: stress, anxiety, loss of savings, loss of control of kids, rebellious kids, shame, guilt, bitterness, anger, etc. yeah but neither this sub nor MRP will admit this apparently if you Man Up!TM enough all these things will go away and things like anger and stress are phases that just go away ostensibly with enough Manning Up I mean prayer and "Game"
/r/RPChristians25/07/18 09:51 PM
1

This is why dread is so important. OP is pointing out a problem: husbands today have no actual authority. While you are correct that dread is effective, this is merely covering the cracks. OP's point remains
/r/RPChristians25/07/18 07:08 PM
1

Leadership doesn't require the means to enforce it. And you're more a real leader in the traditional sense. I like how you just turned authority into "leadership". Yeah, cos the Bible ordered husbands not to have authority but rather to be "leaders". (Redpillwonder 5:22)
/r/RPChristians25/07/18 06:57 PM
1

Sure, if she chooses to move out or separate or divorce you can't do a thing, but then again Jesus wasn't scared of losing followers either (see: John 6). If she's determined, she can leave. So be it. So yeah, you agree with OP's point.
/r/RPChristians25/07/18 06:51 PM
1

Understand that marriage is the only relationship where you are called to lead but have no means of enforcing consequences in the face of the other party rejecting said leadership. If you have no means of enforcing consequences, neither do you have responsibility nor culpability should rebellion happen
/r/RPChristians25/07/18 06:45 PM
1

In reality, the conservatists are just as emotionally driven as the leftist feminists, they just don't want things to change and liked how it was when they were growing up etc Yep. And worst, they like to think they are fighting against the mainstream. This goes hand-in-hand with complementarians in church who tell themselves they are "not of this world". Of course they have zero interest in actually pushing beyond what they were born into, and when they inevitably lose they pat themselves on th…
/r/RPChristians17/07/18 02:32 PM
4

Don't be angry at the feminists and SJWs. They have been consistent to their beliefs since day 1 (abolishing Patriarchy and giving women the rights of men without responsibility). Be angry at the conservatives and the Complementarians. They have been useless for the past 200 years and they don't even know what they're conserving. They just want to stop all social progress at a specific point of time and hope it lasts forever. Of course it doesn't work. That's why SJWs of today are the conservati…
/r/RPChristians17/07/18 11:01 AM
1

I was talking about his hypothetical fantasy world
/r/RPChristians16/07/18 07:22 AM
1

With no power, what is our responsibility? Exactly. With great power comes great responsibility Even Spiderman understands, but the church doesn't
/r/RPChristians16/07/18 07:19 AM
1

I'm more asking out of my own curiosity now, if you don't mind lol If me and my brothers all live together with my father, and the house belongs to my father so my father is head and owner of the house And me and my brothers all have a wife and children, and each son dictates his own wife and child without the patriarch (father) interfering. BUT me and my brothers all work in my father's family business which he inherited from his father, and the wealth belongs to the entire extended family of w…
/r/RPChristians14/07/18 01:02 AM
1

The passage makes the most sense from the perspective that it is the man leaving his father and mother (thus creating his own family). His wife is joined to him, and they become one flesh. Where a man may reside does not mean that he is not making his own family or that he is joining his wife's family. This makes the most sense given the patrilineal succession and inheritance. Oh, that 2nd link basically breaks it down better than I did! That 2nd link doesn't seem to have a problem with patrilin…
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 10:44 PM
3

but I still don't see any exegetical explanation for how the passage itself can be interpreted in a non-feminist way. do these count as exegetical? https://bible.org/seriespage/lesson-7-god-s-design-marriage-genesis-218-25 https://bible.org/seriespage/1-cohesiveness-marriage-union-genesis-224 https://bible.org/seriespage/1-marriage-how-it-works-genesis-218-25
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 08:51 PM
1

He is responsible for the safety and well-being of his men. If his men misbehaves, then it depends if the crime is committed under his order. If the crimes are committed without his order, then he will be charged with failure to control his men (not the crime itself) only if the particular officer has been given the duty, and the tools required, to discipline and control his men. He is not responsible for his subordinates' mutiny or rebellion against himself (insubordination). Common sense every…
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 05:03 PM
1

Yes plenty of issues. For one the state, any state on earth, gives actual functioning authority (power) to parents to govern their children. Parents can prevent their kids from smashing public property (again). It's a different story altogether if we live in world where parents are not allowed to hit/punish their kids nor discipline them and/or scolding children = abuse, etc. In this world, how can you hold parents accountable for their children's actions? All that goes out the window if the sub…
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 10:34 AM
1

Wait, no comments on that quote at all? No problems with it whatsoever? lol?
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 06:45 AM
1

I don't follow, but I should have been clearer anyway. While everyone fears to some extent abuse of authority, feminism perpetuated the myth of patriarchs being especially prone to abuse of authority. This can be seen via our society passing more and more feminist laws over time making patriarchs virtually powerless in their homes, yet somehow society has only grown more fearful and resentful of the hypothetical abusive patriarch.
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 06:36 AM
1

yep but the Doug's version deserves special attention: “When a couple comes for marriage counseling, my operating assumption is always that the man is completely responsible for the all the problems. Some may be inclined to react to this, but it is important to note that responsibility is not the same thing as guilt. If a woman has been unfaithful to her husband, of course she bears the guilt of her adultery. But at the same time, he is responsible for it. … Husbands are responsible for their wi…
/r/RPChristians13/07/18 06:22 AM
1

Some here seem to subscribe to Doug Wilson's version of "Covenant Theology" where "headship" means men are responsible for and/or to be blamed for his wife's/women's sins. Thoughts? Would your answer change if the context is: a) Eve eating dat fruit b) a typical married couple from 1st century Church, wife disobeys husband c) feminism
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 11:45 PM
1

If patriarchy were imposed on nonchristians cwhose men would almost certainly in their sin abuse their power, do we dare ask whether God would prefer egalitarianism for those marriages as the only viable alternative to toxic patriarchs or radical feminists? You're not really gonna argue that God only expects Christians to obey His laws, right whose men would almost certainly in their sin abuse their power That's a feminist Frame btw. As more and more feminist laws are passed, over time this part…
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 10:41 PM
1

That doesn't change the fact that Israel was not meant to be subject to anyone. Hosea 8 describes Assyria attacking Israel as punishment. Ancient Israel was a great nation God is proud of, and ideally should have stayed that way if not for sin. For your interpretation of Romans 13 to be true, Christians will have to stay "non-mainstream" even when they're clearly not. Does that strike you as a logical goal? You confused a game plan for a goal.
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 10:13 PM
2

Because of this, we will forever struggle to have to distinguish between the faithful and the frauds. This will always skew any data we ever get and will also prevent us from witnessing to many people who need the Gospel because we assume they already have it. There are frauds too in the Manosphere. There were frauds too in the Apostles' time, the Bible tells us about them time and again. Here's a whole list of heresies before Constantine! Humans are not perfect. That's not a reason for Christia…
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 09:48 PM
1

I don't see that jiving with Romans 13 at all. I mean, Esther and the Persian Jews obeyed King Xerxes too. Not one of them for one minute believes that's the permanent state of Israel. Every one of them dream of the day Israel returns to it's former glory (aka not under Persian yoke, nor any other foreign power) Ancient Israel was "in the world but not of the world" too. Or at least it should have been...
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 08:51 PM
1

This sub has no empathy for men whatsoever. There's at least one feminist secular regular here, complementarian crap regularly posted claiming "RP". But the harshest comments are reserved for the Christian male, his crime is "being creepy"
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 07:18 PM
3

my point was that all of those actions are meaningless without the true change of heart that comes from being born again I don't know m8. Yes true change of heart is good and all, but does that make political/social revolution meaningless? Consider Emperor Constantine, I think everyone agrees he converted his Empire to Christianity for political reasons. Still, look how far he spread Christianity? You and I probably would not be Christians today if not for him. Are there many "fake", "believe-co…
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 05:51 PM
1

as well as taking action on a local and national level for those who are so led by the Spirit. That's very vague. How is this different from a "revolution"?
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 05:16 PM
1

To that end, I don't see Jesus or the apostles pushing for political or social revolution. I don't think we are meant to change society. I think we are meant to start a new society altogether That is still a revolution. In political terms, it's called "secessionism". If this "new society" is supposed to be under secular authority, then effectively the church is controlled by the secular World. What could possibly go wrong? You can't run away from revolution. Christianity is a revolution. " Do no…
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 04:37 PM
1

To that end, I don't see Jesus or the apostles pushing for political or social revolution. Yeah this would be the Social Gospel, which I believe is 100% false. There is too much in the Bible that makes it clear that we are not heading toward some sort of a "utopian society" as proponents of the Social Gospel believe, which your statement If you don't do anything to change society, you can bet the Enemy will.
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 04:27 PM
0

Yeah, wait a minute,” says the Redpill. “The girl is still ultimately in charge.” I would argue that she is and isn’t. First of all, I’m a pretty picky dad. There ain’t many suitors coming around and asking her for dates. Even more so, there are even less men who are brave enough to ask me to “court” her. On top of that, I’m pretty picky dad and I’ll likely decide that at least half of these guys aren’t going to treat my daughter right. Still even more, within that demographic there is a percent…
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 09:05 AM
1

About the captain and king thing, does chain of command mean nothing to you? You have no idea how chain of command works if you think those in authority takes blame for rebellion. Trust me, former military. The whole king-captain thing is obvious sarcasm, yet you actually agreed with it lol Confronting female rebellion is frightening and hard I actually rather like Mark Driscoll I can tell
/r/RPChristians12/07/18 08:34 AM
7

If so, then (abrahamic) religion is the only way back to Patriarchy
/r/TheRedPill08/07/18 12:38 AM
21

I always thought so many old women are soothsayers/shamans because that's the only way post-menopause women can contribute to a tribal society. But your theory makes more sense. She won't be called women if she isn't constantly trying to find some way to gain power over men. We see the Feminine Imperative disguising as the Holy Spirit in the modern church as well. One has to wonder just how many genuine female believers there are in any religion if they can bend their beliefs at will to suit the…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/18 12:15 AM
2

Pretending the Industrial Revolution never happened is not the way to combat feminism. While his intentions may (or may not) be good, women can obey their husbands/fathers without being a "stay-at-home daughter". Many of these church practices can be "creepy" as hell (as the article described it) because it forces an ancient practice in a modern world. Or as u/rockandrollchuck puts it, forcing a 2.0 practice in a 1.0 world. One thing that would be Biblical, is if the church dares to make fathers…
/r/RPChristians07/07/18 03:16 PM
1

So if we, men, all solely blame women for feminism, We do agree. I don't know, mate. pastors should blame weak men for allowing even an inch of feminist cancer to grow on the church Men are the creators of culture, women aren’t. Independent of the passive allowance, or explicitly approval, of men, women do not define the parameters of the social order. Sure, many women won’t obey their adult live in roommate man child, but a husband who owns his life and fulfills his role as a man? Many, if not …
/r/RPChristians07/07/18 01:36 PM
1

Even in Dalrock’s post you linked, men are the ones burdened with providing the solution (in his case slut shaming) So if we, men, all solely blame women for feminism, which is what I am suggesting, would that be considered "men burdened with providing the solution"? If so, then we agree (and can we please stop these word games already?) If you suggest women need to fix this because they caused the mess in the first place then you have a much higher view of women than I do. Simply put, they aren…
/r/RPChristians05/07/18 03:53 PM
1

You just said it doesn't matter what I say you will still blame men anyway for feminism and/or expect them to fix this mess. I can't respond to that kind of logic. Better to put a post that explains far better than I can. And yes, you may not realize but the post is a response to gilligans like you, the listed cases are merely examples
/r/RPChristians05/07/18 02:54 PM
1

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/we-are-trapped-on-slut-island-and-traditional-conservatives-are-our-gilligan/
/r/RPChristians05/07/18 11:34 AM
1

You're acting like feminism would have dominated the world even if the men had been doing their jobs rightly all along - that the women would have been too strong for us to deal with no matter how hard we fought against feminism. I simply don't agree with that conclusion. So Christian men should do be doing more to fight feminism? I mean if that's what you're trying to say, then yes that's something we can agree on. As long as we remember that deceived men are the problem, not weak men, as you a…
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 05:04 PM
1

Coincidentally I happen to need to find a new job now. HAHA... now I'm scared
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 04:52 PM
1

The sin with these men, though, is male passivity. Are you referring to the male/complementarian pastors, or the average man? The fact that women further sinned by stepping up to fill in that void is their sin. Initially, one could hardly blame them. Was the feminist rebellion a result of men "chugging their rum"? Lol. With respect, you're still missing the point - my point, at least. Feminist rebellion didn't happen because men forced them to take their roles. That is pure fantasy. More Even mo…
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 04:44 PM
1

Suppose a woman hears the rebuke and decides to continue in her rebellion - even over a decade of being rebuked. At what point do we acknowledge that the man must foster a condition where she has incentive to receive the correction? I never said it is wrong for a man to make his wife so wet she really likes submitting to him. Indeed it would be the smart thing to do here, as long as it does not replace calls to repentance. And it definitely does not mean we mix up who the sin here lies with, the…
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 03:11 PM
1

it's 1 hour man. Is there a script somewhere? lol. Easier to quote too if I have to. Tbh, first impression doesn't look good already. From the most liked comments: As a Christian woman, I got no problem with anything Paul said and I think modern feminism is rubbish, lol. But I do have a problem with self-serving, hypocritical "Christian" men who abuse those verses in order to control women. Because of sin, the natural man and woman both struggle for power in relationships, the man as much as the…
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 02:31 PM
1

technically I can't find any wrong in this 5 minutes, but that's not saying much. It's easy to ask men to do better, we'll know more by watching how he asks women to do better (if at all)
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 12:21 PM
1

You love playing word games, eh? When I realized you were gonna make Jesus "responsible" for His people's sin one way or another I got out of that mess immediately. Debating semantics is pointless. Alas here we are again, this time we're gonna argue what "Weak" means. My point is that feminist/chivalric men are responsible for giving women the resources necessary for feminism. What are feminist/chivalric men? They are deceived men. No doubt at this point you will argue that deceived men are weak…
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 11:48 AM
1

Here's a Remix!
/r/RPChristians03/07/18 12:07 AM
1

pastors should blame weakfeminist men for allowing even an inch of feminist cancer to grow on the church” White knights = men sympathetic to feminism and chivalry If there's one thing pastors should be yelling at men for, it's for having feminist and chivalric sympathies. How many pastors dare to yell at men for holding those beliefs? Lol his is simply untrue. Sure, many women won’t obey their adult live in roommate man child, but a husband who owns his life and fulfills his role as a man? Many,…
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 11:50 PM
1

Ok, very well put. If they won't listen to their husbands, but they are going to church and listening to the 'bishops', then if the 'bishops' preach to the congregation that the fault for everything falls squarely on the man, there is no incentive for the women to change or to obey their husbands. The 'bishop' hasn't called out the women's sin, so they don't think there is anything wrong. Or they half-ar53 their message to women like Paul Washer did ("i mean yeah women, submit to your husbands, …
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 11:31 PM
1

/u/rocknrollchuck "STOP LISTENING TO ME! START LISTENING TO YOUR HUSBANDS!1" This is what the pastor should say if it's the husband's responsibility to call out sin. "LISTEN TO ME! START LISTENING TO YOUR HUSBANDS!1" This is what the pastor should say if it's the pastor's responsibility to call out sin. What difference does it make?
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 10:58 PM
1

So what does the Word say about the proper way to handle this kind of situation? If you're asking "whose job is it to point out sin?" then 'bishops' are supposed to teach the Word (Titus 1:19) and husbands are to wash their wives with the Word (Ephesians 5:28). Again, the problem now is that women won't obey husbands, but they will listen to 'bishops' because they are still going to church! So isn't the obvious thing to do is 'bishops' should tell women to stop rebelling? And start obeying husba…
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 10:28 PM
1

Nothing personal /u/Paterpip !
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 09:45 PM
1

1) Do you believe Christ volunteered to take responsibility for dealing with his people’s sin? ""Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done." Luke 22 He was obeying His Father's will. 2) Could the current matriarchy mode of churchianity be possible if men didn’t allow it to exist? Technically you're right, feminism wouldn't be successful if not for white knights. When was the last time a pastor preached against white knighting?
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 09:39 PM
1

I was this <--> close to opening my bible when I noticed the flaw in your logic: Or is the proper approach to address the head of the household and let him lead and discipline at home as he is led by the Spirit and the Word? What does the Bible say about the Pastor's responsibility in this area, specifically? Bro. Women are in rebellion, remember? i.e. they won't obey their husbands. How do you "lead and discipline at home" when they won't obey their husbands? Women won't be in church too if the…
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 09:22 PM
2

I'm sick of these blue/purple pillers strutting into RP subs and voice their opinions under the guise of "mutual dialogue". This isn't a debate sub, /r/purplepilldebate exists for a reason. 95% of Redpillers will never go there for a reason too. But you RRC have been good to me. So I made a response
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 07:45 PM
1

"Man Up and all will be well!" 1 "Man Up and all will be well!" 2 "Man Up and all will be well!" 3 "Man Up and all will be well!" 4 "Man Up and all will be well!" 5 "Man Up and all will be well!" 6
/r/RPChristians02/07/18 07:37 PM
1

To start, I’m not looking to get you all riled up I'm a big fan of man bashing provided it is in the presence of men The standard we hold men to must be the Bible. He's spending a disproportionate time bashing men because he's talking to men and men are ultimately responsible for the rise of feminism The whole premise is that as the leader you own the mistakes of your subordinates Men are the leaders of civilization, they always have and always will be. When women screw up, guess who gets the bl…
/r/RPChristians29/06/18 11:05 PM
1

seriously?
/r/RPChristians29/06/18 10:36 PM
1

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/
/r/RPChristians29/06/18 08:34 AM
1

Is merely being conversative "RP" to you? If you have trouble with man bashing, then, yeah, I can see you have a problem with it You don't have a problem with man bashing? Wtf? And christians wonder why men don't go to church anymore? Gee I wonder why? But you have to realize that he's talking to an exclusively male audience thoroughly saturated in feminism. That is not true, especially the 2nd sermon supposedly teaching the listener how to be woman. Even if you are right, how is that an excuse …
/r/RPChristians28/06/18 08:32 PM
1

https://old.reddit.com/r/RPChristians/comments/7j4mr3/book_suggestions/drd46dp/ https://old.reddit.com/r/RPChristians/comments/7j4mr3/book_suggestions/drd4v5i/
/r/RPChristians28/06/18 10:26 AM
11

I actually have many Muslim friends so I know it's not all nice and dandy on their side too. Islam currently struggles with feminism too, just in different ways we are not aware of. Iran's feminists and liberals are borrowing Western support, clearly with the intent to topple their own Patriarchal government. Lebanon is full-on feminist, some Muslims don't even consider them a "Muslim country". Jordan is 100% sucking Western cock, just look at their royal family. These "Muslims" are slowly becom…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/18 07:22 AM
11

"Declaration of sentiments" in 1848, literally a bunch of feminists declaring their feelings. Who knows how much work they put in before that
/r/TheRedPill28/06/18 07:13 AM
111

They are dragging you into a conflict which will leave you burned Oh please. The slightest discomfort, the minute female employment drops by even 5%, is the cue for white knights to "Man Up!". Women will screech on tv, laws will be changed, new policies will be passed and national constitutions ignored. More witch hunting will ensue, exact details unknown but the net result is always: women will get more, men will suffer more. This has been going on for the past 200 years.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/18 09:34 PM
3

You want women to go to war Yeah right, that's never gonna happen. It's all just for show, token women in token positions so there won't be any men-only spaces. If feminists truly wanted this, it would have happened long ago
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 01:29 PM
1

Fair enough, but at this rate you might as well recommend every single Churchian out there to OP
/r/RPChristians26/06/18 12:41 AM
1

you still listening to that Paul Washer guy? Why?
/r/RPChristians25/06/18 09:36 PM
1

These are typical smear campaign allegations, very typical. We can not expect people to be "squeaky clean"/above reproach by the World's standards, but rather by God's standards.
/r/RPChristians20/06/18 01:39 PM
1

Here's an article that goes into more detail And where is his crime, again? He refused to endorse divorce, as the Bible does too (except adultery) You're not actually calling that a sin, right? Other than that, what else is there? Allegations? Bro, I can organize a smear campaign too that will put this one to shame. It's ridiculously easy to do, especially once the mob has turned on someone. Evidence and trial or no crime, everything else is witchhunting Relevant: https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2…
/r/RPChristians20/06/18 04:41 AM
4

This is the same guy who asked his wife for permission to run for president, and made sure everyone knows about it. https://jdgreear.com/blog/why-im-accepting-nomination-sbc-president/ https://old.reddit.com/r/RPChristians/comments/7xhdx5/asking_wifes_consent/ Back then you gave him the benefit of the doubt too: https://old.reddit.com/r/RPChristians/comments/7xhdx5/asking_wifes_consent/du8j0g0/ Hindsight is 20/20. It's time Christians called these things for what they are: calculated moves aimed…
/r/RPChristians20/06/18 04:23 AM
5

And we see Adam’s passivity echoed in countless marriages today. The temptation to be emotionally and spiritually absent, when physically present, has merely changed hairstyles over time. The same unmanly repose still beckons men to recline in the passenger’s seat. God calls out to husbands today with the same question he asked in the garden: “Adam, where are you?” And where are we? Too often giving into the scheme that affords less responsibility and more opportunity to watch the game It's all …
/r/RPChristians19/06/18 06:58 PM
1

Back then we used to say the only thing that can stop a man from attracting women, is if he's a eunuch. And even then, there might be exceptions, who knows? (GoT Greyworm...? lol) The possibilities are endless for the Don Juan. The Manosphere has changed a lot since then indeed
/r/RPChristians15/06/18 02:50 PM
1

But the black pill does get at least part of the story. http://www.sosuave.net/forum/threads/the-secret-of-the-jerk.17008/ Come to da Pook side :D
/r/RPChristians15/06/18 12:25 PM
2

that EC seems to think women are as visual as men. That's his big RP realization. (more like black pill) Except there are tons of ugly/homeless/even criminals who get laid with 9s and 10s all the time. If only women are that simple, good looking men will never need RP
/r/RPChristians15/06/18 08:36 AM
2

Already married women Little house on the prairie re-enactment girl "If-she-was-any-more-covered-she'd-be-wearing-a-burka lady" Fat and loved "just the way she is" Super hot gir- crap she's married to one of the guys in the band Older, single, desperate. The pastor probably tried to set you up already. btw you missed the "born-again virgin"
/r/RPChristians14/06/18 11:59 AM
1

Yes. Christian men* can, but you probably shouldn't. *Men can but women can't. Why? Because if they do they will take on the frame of the secular guy which is obviously a terrible idea when it comes with eternal damnation. As controversial as it sounds, I have to agree to some extent (the extent being you don't marry the non-christian) Well if so then it can only work if you: know exactly what you want out of the date know exactly what your beliefs are, and can live up to them So since I date gi…
/r/RPChristians14/06/18 11:48 AM
1

I wouldn't say lust, but desire. Same thing mate. You're just using different words because you see now how ridiculous your position is. Unless you wanna to make the argument that hypergamy is not lust....
/r/RPChristians11/06/18 10:55 AM
1

so you're saying God wants women to lust after Him not their husbands?
/r/RPChristians11/06/18 10:19 AM
1

If whining and crying helps you achieve something you otherwise wouldn't, aren't you receiving different treatment from it? I'm not following. Crying is for yourself, some situations calls for crying and wailing loudly (eg death of a loved one). If whining loud enough will change the laws, all men should whine 24/7 But if it is your default m.o. anyway Is anyone stoic by default lol
/r/RPChristians06/06/18 05:01 PM
1

"blood, sweat, tears" is usable in all situations. What matters is that the man don't "whine" (and even then, he should whine if it helps him achieve something) So crying is fine, as long as you don't expect sympathy or different treatment from it. Vomit/bleed if you want, but always cover up your tracks. The main difference being, "Stoic" is basically a lie you tell yourself, an act you put on. It will always lose to the natural route EDIT: Book of Pook defines WIMP as a "Women Influenced Male …
/r/RPChristians06/06/18 02:24 PM
1

wow it is your post. I must say I'm surprised, but it is a difference in philosophy after all In the military we/they have a saying, "blood sweat tears" is what makes a man. The idea is to bleed, sweat and cry all you want during hardship, but to always come out of it stronger. Of course, there's always that one, ONE drill seargent who just has to live by the stereotype and demand men to never cry, never whine, and just "Man Up!", as if it comes overnight. He most certainly has sadomasochist ten…
/r/RPChristians06/06/18 06:09 AM
3

....... this is why people laugh at christians
/r/RPChristians05/06/18 08:03 PM
2

There does seem to be a divide in the manosphere since forever. On one hand there are those who believe men should never ever show weakness to women. Someone made a post here recently about breaking bones (!!!) and forcing himself to joke about it and how much women liked him for it. (I thought it was ridiculous) Then theres the camp that believes men should not be afraid to show weakness or cry, that true strength lies in not giving a crap what women think. This camp seems to be getting rarer o…
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 08:36 PM
1

indeed, which is why like I said, this seems like a huge question mark, instead of the "simple, pr0n is evil LUL" conclusion both the churchians and the Christian Manosphere jump straight to. If we assume that God/Solomon's intention for SoS is to titilate, then we can assume too that God/Solomon will definitely, with today's technology, make a visual version of it (for men) and a poetic version of it (for women). So as I mentioned, it seems to me the most important question is, therefore, "what…
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 07:46 PM
1

then my point still remains: if Solomon's 50 shades can be "holy", why not the visual, mainstream porn today?
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 06:38 PM
1

so you're saying, SoS is not "female porn" but porn for everyone, because of lack of technology? Cos even if you're right, it just means if Solomon were to write SoS today, it'd be one video version and one poem version
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 05:59 PM
1

But it has become increasing cool to throw him under the bus. actually, Driscoll's biggest flaw is that HE throws men under the bus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkaeAkJO0w8 But no doubt you've already seen that one. It won't be as bad if that's all there is... but wait, there's more! https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2015/01/28/message-received/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/mark-driscolls-feminist-foolishness-posing-as-christian-wisdom/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/if-mar…
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 05:00 PM
2

actually, visual pornography is not a new thing at all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography#History perhaps the only new thing is the technology involved. The ancient Chinese/Japanese have very erm... "advanced" forms of porn. I don't see the point of women not being able to access Scripture, and/or women not being able to read. The point remains that "literature porn", such as the SoS or 50 shades of grey, is erotica to women. Therefore "female porn". While visual pornorgraphy is erotica …
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 04:44 PM
1

That male SMV is a lie. Women care nothing about SMV, only Strength and Imagination. Capture her thoughts, her feelings and her imagination, and suddenly you have the highest "SMV" in the world. A homeless man can have the highest "SMV" in the world if he is a Don Juan. Pump a statue full of testosterone, place it in the middle of the room and women will gravitate to him... I mean 'it' Women do care about "SMV" though, when she is looking for a provider (beta)
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 11:14 AM
1

I wanted to stay out of this fight but figured it does seem to be related to the Feminine Imperative at the end of the day, hear me out. See I understand the arguments, and we all know what the Bible says, etc. Indeed, many verses of the Bible could be used in the case against porn... But here's the thing: Song of Solomon is female porn. It's 50 SOG on a whole other level. Anyone who knows how to turn women on a visceral level, knows this is true. Which group of people would love for male erotic…
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 11:04 AM
1

"porn is anything you lose interest in after masturbating." Since the ONLY thing you don't lose sexual interest in after busting yo nut is your wife/gf/someone you "love", this phrase is just reinforcing the whole modern myth of love purifying sex. People in the past didn't marry for love, pretty sure they "lose interest" in their wives too after busting their nut... but God calls it good Literally nothing good comes outta that sub lol
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 08:12 AM
2

Yes I have!!! His many later blog posts would be compiled, into what he calls "The Mill" https://illimitableman.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/the-book-of-pook-and-the-mill.pdf It's a very different take compared to the Book of Pook, a lot more intellectual and political boring but we Pooklings swallowed it like Scripture anyway :D He tries to stay irreligious throughout but it's clear he is sympathetic to Christianity as well as a few other pagan religions. Especially Christianity, the post "Jesus…
/r/RPChristians04/06/18 05:42 AM
2

about a decade ago first-gen Manosphere, there were the Roissys the Rooshs the Rollos etc. Some of us followed the Pook instead. Legendary guy, preached for a few years then disappeared. He basically taught that male SMV is a lie - well at least, not anything like the Manosphere (RP) today describe it as. I find it ironic how so many in the Manosphere look up to him yet completely miss some of his most important points Anyways, I'm a devout Pook-follower. 2nd only to Christ :) Look him up and fe…
/r/RPChristians03/06/18 09:16 PM
2

imagine an attractive women asking if she should lower her SMV becos of male attention
/r/RPChristians02/06/18 06:12 PM
1

Nobody - not even me - is better at this Dalrock actually, I'm but a student lol You should post that bit as a question on r/TrueChristian and see what the Cathodox say in response The typical churchian Catholic/Orthodox response would be something like: -interpreting the Bible is ok as long as it doesn't go against dogma -there is no dogma on Patriarchy, so it must be wrong -there is dogma on wife's submission, but no one defined "submission" yet so.... Game on! -if feminist theory is wrong, ou…
/r/RPChristians02/06/18 05:46 PM
3

Churchians fear women. Unfortunately for them, they all eventually will need to tackle the "troublesome" topic of gender roles in some way. One common tactic is start your entire sermon making (what Dalrock calls) "peace offerings" to modern women. Right off the bat, Sir Churchian flies out with a peace offering, making it very clear to everyone that, though he will preach on submission, it doesn't have to be a "bad" kind of submission. He'll preach a "good" kind of submission! You see, he total…
/r/RPChristians02/06/18 12:40 PM
1

think it was Dalrock did a post on Driscoll's popularity among men: basically it's some form of Sadomasochism where men without father figures yearn to be yelled at and humiliated. Of course, mixed with a nice dose of pastor-AMOG and female worship (Bad migraine today btw, no mental fortitude for complementarian drivel: i'll take a look at the orthodox stuff tmr)
/r/RPChristians01/06/18 06:26 PM
3

'The Church Impotent' by Leon J Podles ran statistics and numbers of various religious circles around the world. Can't remember the actual numbers but the results were basically, that the shortage of men is a problem unique to Catholicism and Protestantism only.
/r/RPChristians31/05/18 09:03 PM
2

LOL gotta love the Churchians' comments! desparately trying to rationalize away the fact their beloved Church has been feminized: Two important facts to know:1)Testosterone levels decline with age. 2)They are maximal in the early twenties.If you survey men’s testosterone levels in a group with age ranges from 37 to 85,the correlation is-the younger(and dumber) you are,the less likely you are to have realized that there is a God,and you aren’t Him.The corollary-the more years you have lived,the l…
/r/RPChristians31/05/18 08:57 PM
1

water is wet
/r/RPChristians31/05/18 08:39 PM
2

I am getting the impression that you aren't a Christian, so I don't know why you are here arguing about the effectiveness of God's way if you aren't going to try God's way. She's not RP either. She's a provocateur
/r/RPChristians30/05/18 09:06 AM
1

nahh, they won't even admit it's a dress, and that's the genius of the Churchian. If the churchian separates the Bride from the Dress, he would lose all moral justification for insisting on the current status quo. Besides, they also need a casus belli against the "rogues" like us. What better way to demonize a group of people, than to claim they are attacking the church?
/r/RPChristians29/05/18 07:14 PM
1

then everyone should abandon this dress. It's rotting and putrid to the core.
/r/RPChristians29/05/18 06:10 PM
2

lol talk about missing the point! Of course the Church isn't dead. I'm here. You're here. As long as there are Christians alive, the Church hasn't died. The organized church, the 'church institution', the one that meets on sundays and buys/rents buildings or land or theatres so it can preach and have a reason to collect tithes. The one that goes by fancy sounding names like "GRACE REDEEMED SON OF NEW CREATION LAMB OF HILLS AND MOUNTAINS PLANET EARTH MARS SHAKERS" ... that "church" we're constant…
/r/RPChristians29/05/18 05:46 PM
1

Kudos having the patience to explain all that. I don't. I'm more interested how her comments got so high in "RP" freaking Christians
/r/RPChristians29/05/18 07:43 AM
2

Dalrock's update: Patterson's crimes against feminism for all those missing the point
/r/RPChristians28/05/18 07:21 PM
2

you're still working under the assumption that the modern 'church' is even the church. I think the modern church died a long time ago. So I say we let it rot, and look for new ways to build His kingdom. The more it rots, the more Christians will wake up
/r/RPChristians28/05/18 08:14 AM
1

but you were right though. No one gives a crap about men, especially not the churchians
/r/RPChristians27/05/18 08:06 PM
1

ok
/r/RPChristians27/05/18 07:24 PM
2

you're still missing the point He didn't get punished for abusing women. He didn't abuse women. He didn't call for women to be abused. He lost his job because he criticized divorce, even in the case of abuse
/r/RPChristians27/05/18 07:21 PM
1

Way to miss the point! He criticized divorce, even in the case of abuse. That's why he lost his job.
/r/RPChristians27/05/18 07:40 AM
1

Personal thoughts: From a purely (spiritual) warfare POV, this isn't necessarily a bad thing as it pushes Churchian men one step closer to their 'breaking point'. The sooner people learn that the modern church is beyond dead, the sooner the inevitable response
/r/RPChristians26/05/18 11:14 PM
2

Churchians piling on the mob: https://www.christianpost.com/news/beth-moore-slams-christians-who-demonize-divorce-worst-sin-we-do-not-submit-to-abuse-223520/ https://www.christianpost.com/news/wrath-of-god-poured-out-southern-baptists-cry-out-after-paige-patterson-steps-down-224326/ Churchians cower before the mob: https://www.christianpost.com/news/so-baptist-head-steve-gaines-asks-for-forgiveness-over-paige-patterson-controversy-the-church-is-no-place-for-misogyny-223984/ https://www.christian…
/r/RPChristians26/05/18 11:06 PM
5

Imagine if instead of "Will you forgive me?" they said what they're really asking: "Will you pretend I never did that?" I lol'd, attorney indeed ;)
/r/RPChristians25/05/18 08:50 PM
12

would you play devils advocate to womens' standards in men?
/r/RPChristians25/05/18 06:48 PM
1

at times like these, I think it best to consult what Martin Luther has to say about the Apocrypha: "Apocrypha, that are books which are not considered equal to the Holy Scriptures, but are useful and good to read."
/r/RPChristians22/05/18 12:26 PM
2

perhaps you're from a "better" church, at least in this regard? Many of the bloggers on the Manosphere (even Dalrock) married young too
/r/RPChristians21/05/18 02:58 PM
1

Don't look too intently at a virgin don't go looking about in the streets or wandering around in the run-down parts of town. When you see a good-looking woman, look the other way; Don't sit down to eat with another man's wife or join her for a drink. Catholic feminists/puritans have been using these verses to control male behaviour for centuries now, some translations are even worse. An entire doctrine against the "Male Gaze" is formed, just on these verses alone. I'd say it's a blessing we don'…
/r/RPChristians21/05/18 07:16 AM
1

in the movie The Matrix, Neo taking the "Red Pill" actually removed the lens he had been seeing the World from
/r/RPChristians21/05/18 07:05 AM
6

believe it or not, the majority of Christians in the Manosphere look down upon sexual activities outside of marriage. The only caveats are that some among us: 1) believe that sex = marriage, so there cannot be a "pre-marital" sex 2) believe that the legal contract of 'marriage' is not biblical marriage 3) believe that the concept of "Pre-Marital Sex" is invented by the feminized church to demonize men and maximize the duration of the Celibate Boyfriend , whereas the Bible condemns all non-marita…
/r/RPChristians19/05/18 07:12 PM
63

the whole wedding is a calculated move. Post-wall, American celebrity, feminist, divorced, ethnic, child of single mother? None of this is a coincidence EDIT: oh and no pre-nup too
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 06:31 PM
2

>Looks like a scene from a Bethesda game. Get married, earn 20% more septims! Forget questing and man up!
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 06:13 PM
1

nations that sell land to you will still claim jurisdiction over you you won't be able to raise a "private army", only "sovereign governments" can do that. And let's not forget that being a "misogynist country" is basically reason to declare war these days. There are literally 2 million ways other countries can find fault with this nation of yours, and you know people will do anything on the political stage
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 05:35 PM
1

is it like a racist thing, cos im asian in terms of religion, is this nation of yours secular like the West now? Looks like it. Without an objective morality, how can anyone in this nation ever define right and wrong? in terms of political idealogy, is this nation of yours gonna be democratic? A lot to talk about here too how is this nation supposed to survive without women i'll be honest i'm not necessarily looking to join, but I am very fascinated with what you're doing
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 02:15 PM
0

real strength would be to cry and completely not care what others think
/r/RPChristians17/05/18 07:16 PM
4

Feign sympathy for feminist/misandric beliefs, Wait for her "Chameleon" to take over ??? Next
/r/RPChristians15/05/18 04:19 PM
2

first wave feminism really isn't much different
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 07:46 PM
4

when the Manosphere make fun of conservatives, we are referring to those who want society to maintain exactly the way it is now. LGBT is fine apparently, multiple genders are not... 20 years later the "conservatives" will be the liberals today. Multiple genders are fine, something else is not... And that's why progressives always win. They might not win the seat in your state, in the long run they will always win the idealogical war because the current year conservatives simply don't know what t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/18 09:24 AM
10

why are we still calling them "single mothers" when they're obviously married to the state
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/18 08:32 PM
2

you can tell all that to a cuckservative he will still expect men to fix this mess. "Man up!"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/18 08:25 PM
1

A common theme often heard among conservative Christians is to demand that men continue acting in a traditional manner ("no kino!"), while making no attempt whatsoever to return society back to it's traditional form. And of course, women are definitely not required to have their "freedom" restricted in any way (men can't kino, but women still get to marry who their vaginas tell them to) So in a way, conservatives are the Church's biggest obstacle to real change. Perhaps even a bigger obstacle th…
/r/RPChristians12/05/18 02:31 PM
2

it is literally impossible to get a woman 101% head over heels in love with you without kino so unless we suddenly teleport back in time to a society of arranged marriages/romantic love not necessary for marriage... and I sure do not mind...
/r/RPChristians12/05/18 05:53 AM
1

Are you saying that the picture provided by marriage is now a moot point because the spiritual reality of the relationship between Christ and the church has been achieved? that is a possibility One way to look at it is that God created the "picture of marriage" (aka Garden of Eden, not good for man to be alone, etc.) and then later in the New Testament taught that it's "better to be single". Since the biggest difference before and after is that sin has now came into the picture, it could be poss…
/r/RPChristians10/05/18 07:28 AM
2

Younger widows are encouraged to be remarried lest they violate their pledge to stay single for God and are tempted to idleness, gossip, and busybodies. not sure if you're aware but there is a fairly popular interpretation out there, that the NT "widows" here refers to a first century Order of self-made celibate virgin women who calls themselves "The Widows", drawing inspiration from Old Testament promises to widows. This could explain 1 timothy 5:3 "Honor widows who are truly widows." According…
/r/RPChristians10/05/18 06:08 AM
1

not sure why you're challenging red pillers, literally no one's more anti marriage(ish) than us I dare you post this on /r/truechristian though lol or /r/christianity for extra LOLs
/r/RPChristians09/05/18 08:26 PM
1

I think you should sign a contract with this barber that states that he can mess up your hairline anytime he wants and there's nothing you can do about it you have to continue visiting him and him only for the rest of your life, he can also refuse to cut your hair as well you still have to pay him and also if you ever make him unhappy he can take half of everything you own
/r/askTRP08/05/18 10:00 PM
12

I don't see the problem here. You don't pay a whore to come, you pay her to leave. And now we know a way to get them to leave, free of charge?!?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 11:53 AM
9

oh yeah Angela Merkel makes me rock hard. Such powerful many empowered!
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 04:19 AM
1

but only if the man first has sex with an ugly woman This isn't entirely accurate. The actual script says this: so long as they first sleep with the uglier members of the opposite sex. Women will always pretend to be for "equality" when pushing their agenda. Aristophanes got this spot on
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 04:08 AM
3

on the other hand, arbitrary boundaries on their 'boyfriends' before marriage are really just another form of s-tests disguised as purity. These women will have different 'boundaries' (s-tests) after marriage, after all the man never passed her initial tests, why should she stop? Feminist-Puritanism is well and alive in the Church, the most obvious case being 1997 "I Kissed Dating Goodbye" by Joshua Harris, who famously encouraged women (and men) to have all sorts of ridiculous "boundaries" befo…
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 07:31 AM
1

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/we-are-trapped-on-slut-island-and-traditional-conservatives-are-our-gilligan/ https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/godly-unashamed-unwed-mothers/
/r/RPChristians03/05/18 01:13 PM
1

Can you imagine a 'Purity Ball' at which mothers dance with their adolescent sons and pledge to keep their virginity safe and sound until their wedding night? no because that would put the blame and responsibility on the mother should son lose his virginity before marriage
/r/RPChristians03/05/18 12:29 PM
1

... i have so many questions now
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 12:15 PM
5

I mean, I'd do all that too if it means she works outside...
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 08:40 AM
3

the 1900s men look at the 1950s women and shake their heads too. Feminism has been around since 1800s
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 08:38 AM
3

I for one welcome this push to end gray-shaming Older grey hair men should be able to date young girls without social stigma
/r/TheRedPill03/05/18 08:17 AM
1

And my interactions with other women seem to demonstrate that I am that type. With respect of course... I don't see that. I see a man who thinks his muscles and 6 figures makes him "the prize". I see a man who thinks female attention makes him TEH MANZZ!!1 A man who has so little confidence he thinks "church culture" can stop women getting wet over him. I see a man who wrote a thousand words over the internet asking others how he can win over his wife! Rename your post "WHY SHOULD I WIN OVER MY …
/r/RPChristians02/05/18 08:34 PM
2

When I walk away from bad sex, she always blames it on things from 15 years ago when we were dating Notice how she's subtly shifting the blame from "the culture" to you? She'll blame everything, culture, you, her parents the fan on the ceiling, anything but admit that she's a frigid wife. Women would rather die than associate themselves with sexual frigidity Many of my clients come to me for marriage counseling because of this exact teaching that stifles female sexuality. Oh if I had a nickel fo…
/r/RPChristians02/05/18 07:52 PM
-2

and she said, "blahblahblah, yapyapyap, blahblahblah blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah As the conversation went on, she stated that "blahblahblah, yappity yap yap yap! blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh" oh gawd, so much blah! When I walk away from bad sex, she always blames it on things from 15 years ago lol BS she was raised in the church…
/r/RPChristians02/05/18 08:20 AM
1

Nahh don't ever feel bad trashing on Evangies. It's normal, men make fun of each other. Men trash on those who do silly things even more. Doesn't mean you have to freak out. Back in boot camp there was this one Buddhist guy from this weird buddhist sect (cult maybe?), he had this weird ritual he'll chant loudly before meals and sleep. You bet we made fun of him, hard. But guess what, he's secure about it. He laughed it off and eventually everyone accepted him and his weird practices. It's only t…
/r/RPChristians30/04/18 06:29 AM
1

eewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
/r/RPChristians30/04/18 05:42 AM
1

"Would Jesus jaywalk? legal scrupulosity I mean, when your entire denomination/movement teach that saying "GOD DAMMIT" or "JESUS CHRIST!" lands you in hell, this is the only logical conclusion To make matters worst, it's soo hard to give a good criticism of Evangelicals when it's basically impossible to define them. They're not a denomination! So they say. More like a movement/semi-denomination/community/network/whatevertheysaytheyare. Which means this gives them room for practicing all kinds of…
/r/RPChristians30/04/18 05:32 AM
1

Admittedly, I'm not familiar (i.e completely unaware) of Voddie Baucham's teachings. But I must say I am very very doubtful that such a prominent, accepted pastor can do all that without appeasing the FI in some way. I might have to do a bit of forensic CSI myself if no one in the manosphere does it 2 minutes of googling though tells me that Voddie Bauchum is involved in "The Art of Marriage", some workshop co-organized by him, together with Grudem/Mohler all our favourite Blu-pill Complementari…
/r/RPChristians28/04/18 06:39 AM
1

Personally, I do not believe 'small churches' are any better than big ones. And I've been in many. If it helps - many in the Christian Manosphere, me included, have abandoned the modern church, yet remained Christians. I guess what keeps us going is faith, the Word of God and the Holy Spirit. Reading the Bible without any influence from anyone else, especially Christians, can be extremely eye-opening.
/r/RPChristians27/04/18 06:23 PM
2

If we apply red pill what you guys want is another reformation I think yep. I'm in!
/r/RPChristians27/04/18 06:16 PM
1

If the goal is to get sex That's why as Deep mentioned, Game has to be replaced by something. Biblical Marriage is the solution. AKA both husband and wife has conjugal rights over the other at all times. If we take AWALT to be true and that women won't change Anyone, men or women, can repent of their sin at any moment. A husband's duty is to remind and teach his wife the Word, and to rebuke/discipline her when she sins. It's up to her though whether or not she chooses to repent, no one can force…
/r/RPChristians27/04/18 02:27 PM
4

I don’t usually date women over 29 Never ever tell women your preferred age range. You risk social backlash with exactly no gain. In fact, sneak in one or two 29+ occasionally, make sure everyone knows about it (then GHOST)
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 10:36 AM
1

not sure why it has to be so complicated The entire Christian Manosphere 'Game' debate was simply: "Do we do what attracts women?" VS "Do we just be men?" with men here being defined independantly of women. GAME is anything a man does that impacts his attractiveness to a woman So as you can see, this definition right here already puts the man who employs Game in the Frame of women. Why does it even matter what a woman finds attractive? That's the position of the anti-Game camp.
/r/RPChristians27/04/18 09:53 AM
1

but Courtly love, disguised as Chivalry, is everywhere. It's the entire basis of feminism and our culture. We fight it by first pointing it out
/r/RPChristians26/04/18 08:23 PM
6

"Blinded by Chivalry" is a breakthrough. For the first time the Game and non-Game positions are reconciled, the missing link being Chivalry. Some guy commented that Chivalry replaced God with women as Master, and men as slaves. Game promotes the man/husband from slave to her favourite court jester. Perhaps da GBFM is more of a genius than we give him credit for? lzozozlzzol
/r/RPChristians26/04/18 08:08 PM
2

Hi Deep. Always nice to see bloggers from the Manosphere participate on reddit. I've always imagined the future of Church to be something on the internet. It seems to be the only, yet surest way of escaping the Feminine Imperative infested "church". But the current blog format of the 'Manosphere church' is a mess, one guy blogs something and everyone else shouts past one another. Impossible for anyone to share problems, chat, or do anything really, other than debate (if even that) Me thinks it's…
/r/RPChristians25/04/18 07:19 PM
2

See on one hand, I totally understand you living your life to your own standards, and wanting to teach the newbs here a valuable lesson with a recent event in your life. It's nice But on the other hand, your whole post kinda screams oneitis
/r/TheRedPill23/04/18 08:06 AM
12

I like how that sub is one huge Team Women circlejerk, except on the rare occasion when a post accidentally threatens to expose some truth about women they really don't want men to know, then that woman is immediately thrown under the bus. Female solipsism > Team Women Women are so predictable
/r/TheRedPill23/04/18 07:49 AM
14

As the saying goes: You're not Don Juan until you leave the internet. (10 years ago we used to say 'Don Juan' instead of alpha, or 'red pill')
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 07:55 AM
1

Perhaps. Irrelevant either way. Like that angry father, it's all just empty threats: you can't do anything once the law says the girl is of legal age. Remember, we're talking about girls who are of legal age, according to the law of the land. Well you can take things into your own hands and commit acts of violence, but then you would be the one paying the legal consequences, not the guy who date your sister/daughter. Merely threatening someone in-real-life with acts of violence is technically il…
/r/askTRP21/04/18 09:15 PM
1

Exactly. It's not about the age: we are all naturally protective of our family members. As redpillers it's our job to ignore over-protective family members, otherwise we'll never get anywhere.
/r/askTRP21/04/18 08:45 PM
1

Yep. Funny what passes for "Red pill" these days. If you tried this "half your age + 7" BS years ago on TRP you'd be laughed at. Today it's upvoted...
/r/askTRP21/04/18 06:21 AM
4

Most experiences Ive had with females in my life are positive. Still took the red pill anyway. Why? Because I'm not blind and can see feminism/gynocentricism in every aspect of law, academia, social narratives as well as how well women control society's Overton Window - and how clueless men are about it. So there - for all you blue/purple pillers waiting to pounce on this post going "AHA! Red Pillers just really don't like women! so I don't have to address all the other valid points RP raises"
/r/TheRedPill21/04/18 06:14 AM
3

i date 16 year olds, legal here. Sue me OP said its legal there. Your anglosphere common sense is not the only common sense around. Btw last time I heard "if I found you dating my _____ there would be hell to pay!!!" it was from an angry father, I was dating his daughter. She was 21. Lol
/r/askTRP20/04/18 11:14 PM
-1

if I found you dating my _____ there would be hell to pay ohh the number of times redpillers hear that...
/r/askTRP20/04/18 10:58 PM
0

being totally upfront about your intentions, actually lowers the risk of "regret rape". and like I said, that is no defence at all from a woman who can use any of the things I mentioned above to punish you via the state. I honeslty don't know what you're trying to say. Men and women use all kinds of ways to extract things they want out of each other. Methods used can range anywhere from PUA tactics, to makeup, to who knows what the Ancient Chinese casanovas use to seduce women. Things desired fr…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 04:54 PM
2

She wants to get paid for her promiscuous behaviour, fails, so now she gets society to demonize the man
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 04:34 PM
0

If you're a man about it and tell her straight up you just want to fuck, and she's into it, that's not a problem. you know we live a world where false rape accusations, Metoo, retrospective withdrawal of consent (regret rape), even marital rape are all things now, right?
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 03:54 PM
9

Using women for sex is when you lead her to believe you want a serious commited relationship in order for her to agree. thats the blu pill understanding, yeah
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 03:46 PM
2

there's AMOGing and then there's TRP AMOGing, apparently. First time I've seen this. Very clever too, if glo replies anything he'll call it "qualifying" again.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 06:47 AM
51

I never understood this whole "use women for sex" thing. Assuming sex was consensual, one can only "use women for sex" in a world where women are never horny.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 06:25 AM
4

Esther Vilar (in)famously wrote that even in sex, men are the ones being manipulated by women. Women will then cleverly portray men as the manipulators, and men will gladly accept it due to their ego. To consider the alternative will be to admit that he had been manipulated; and what man will want to be seen as inferior to women?
/r/TheRedPill19/04/18 06:20 AM
1

Liberals want the bus to fall down a cliff. Conservatives want the bus to go over the cliff slowly Still don't know what I can do though. Sorry
/r/TheRedPill15/04/18 07:25 AM
2

im guessing some reddit management level woman said "come over" and he said no
/r/TheRedPill15/04/18 07:12 AM
1

True true. Women fear shame more than death
/r/TheRedPill15/04/18 07:07 AM
5

the whole "leftover women" thing is overblown gynocentric BS Chinese urban women are notoriously bitchy. The numbers are in their favour (more men than women I believe) and the increased wealth etc allow them to make ridiculous demands of men. Some men there respond by going MGTOW and the women are crying "boohoo leftover". Bitch, have you even heard of 'cat ladies' in the West?
/r/TheRedPill14/04/18 09:28 PM
1

you need to read Esther Vilar bro
/r/TheRedPill14/04/18 09:21 PM
6

and they thought making half the characters strong 'modern women' would make more females play different roles. Hah
/r/TheRedPill14/04/18 09:20 PM
2

I've yet to meet an anti-piracy Christian not from the first world. When you come from a place where the government and the pirates are one and the same, and the laws are so corrupt there are "official" laws and "not-official" laws, and then there are "laws" in inverted commas... and then there are "laws" specifically designed to handicap law-abiding citizens (no doubt implemented by non-law-abiding citizens) I'd like to see what the anti-piracy Christians have to say then
/r/RPChristians04/04/18 08:05 PM
50

A dog barked at me yesterday it was like eww what 9 years old? I felt soo humiliated and ashamed like omg ewww this is NOT okay men should have the right to walk home safe without dogs barking at them this is speciesism in 2018 plain and simple #MenToo
/r/TheRedPill03/04/18 11:15 PM
1

its a temporary band-aid to pacify what has been deep-seated anger among men in the UK Don't for a second think that real change is gonna happen
/r/MGTOW02/04/18 10:37 PM
2

guilt is a feeling. Feeling bad is a feeling. Remorse is a change in attitude that first requires one to take responsibility for his/her own actions and realize that he/she is in the wrong, followed by the realization that this said individual deserves the consequences of his/her own actions.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/18 05:22 PM
-1

women do have feelings Of course they do. Women are 100% feelings. Women are nothing without feelings. Remorse is not a feeling.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/18 11:58 PM
1

As Dalrock puts it, today love has replaced marriage as the thing that purifies sex. Since "love" is really just feels, "yes, but I felt bad about it" also kinda feels like it purifies the sexual encounter. Humanity used to have a better test: if she's not a virgin on her wedding night... SLUT
/r/TheRedPill31/03/18 11:54 PM
14

now slap the word 'MARRIAGE' on top and millions of men sign up
/r/TheRedPill30/03/18 02:40 PM
2

When I was 20 a 19 year old girl called me creepy for dating an 18 year old ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/TheRedPill30/03/18 07:40 AM
1

well we're talking "what you find most attractive?" here so all answers are subjective
/r/TheRedPill30/03/18 07:36 AM
7

i mean, it's THE most blue pill movie of all time
/r/TheRedPill29/03/18 12:29 PM
22

/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/
/r/MGTOW26/03/18 05:06 PM
1

'censorship' was never the concern
/r/RPChristians21/03/18 07:25 PM
6

For the purpose of enforcing Rule 7, let me be clear: any encouragement that someone engage in sex outside of marriage will be deemed a rule violation, the comment will be removed, and the person potentially temp or permabanned /u/redpillwonder see I told you it will come to this https://www.reddit.com/r/RPChristians/comments/81suu0/how_to_approach_sexaul_relationships_as_red/dv804sp/ Good job
/r/RPChristians21/03/18 09:54 AM
10

Good catch, apparently the feminists found their first attack "if it looks like a woman, it has to be treated like one!" They will try and try and try until they find one line of reasoning that society somewhat accepts. "Think about the children!" or something. Then they push it with all their might with the media, propaganda and academia/scholarship until it becomes law. With regards to sex robots, we get to observe stage 1 feminism all over again. Fun times
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 08:40 PM
6

Like, if you put your hand on a hot stove, you don't put it on stoves anymore right? You're letting them get away with their false assumption that one can only be "redpilled" through experience. Foresight teaches gently, error teaches brutally. Some of us learnt by watching others, or simply by learning the theory and foreseeing that future damage is possible, even likely. The only correct response is to point out this attempt on their part to nuke all further discussion, aka 'poisoning the well…
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 08:22 PM
9

The GF said that money was tight, so we needed to cut back on spending. Never ever say OK to this It's equivalent to her asking for your credit card without her asking for your credit card
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 08:16 PM
1

It's not "Pride" if a man doesn't think his chances of winning are good, given the time and resources he has to invest should he choose to 'fight'.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 08:14 PM
1

its not that simple. Feminism is fundamentally about power over men. Birth control for men will give men power over their own lives and future. Feminism can't have that
/r/MGTOW19/03/18 01:29 PM
2

so what is it even about?
/r/MGTOW19/03/18 09:55 AM
5

there is no way in hell the feminists will just let this fly
/r/MGTOW19/03/18 12:53 AM
2

shits and giggles. almost like how the Justin Trudeaus of the world see us
/r/MGTOW18/03/18 11:13 PM
1

It's a political move. She won't leave him cos she's a political wife, and the PC media will point at this as role model and label any man who wants a pre-nup "misogynistic"
/r/MGTOW18/03/18 01:40 PM
14

Cos she's ethnic, not royalty, post-Wall and feminist. It's a calculated move to improve the British royals' image among young people today. They don't need kids too cos Prince William already has
/r/MGTOW18/03/18 01:36 PM
1

For thousands of years in China, wives of defeated men are expected to commit suicide to preserve their chastity. Women who do that are spoken of highly by those surviving, even by their enemies. Of course today all that is "misogynistic". Women once again reveal that they aren't interested in the illusions society came up with to help her.
/r/MGTOW17/03/18 06:26 PM
0

The god of our modern world is Love. You can get away with murder by claiming "Love". Say you Love and Respect women too much to treat them differently. Do it in the most unangry, most understanding tone you can. Do your best Justin Trudeau impression. Don't worry, women are emotional AF. One "charming" performance later and all is forgiven. "Hey that lindomano isn't so bad..." Next time just give simple answers. "No". Manager confronts you, just say "erm, that's sexist" but in the most "Loving"…
/r/MGTOW17/03/18 06:22 PM
2

i know this is mgtow sub, but still... O.C.R ONE COCK RULE
/r/MGTOW16/03/18 04:33 PM
2

If all tradcucks' wives are as "anti-feminist" as they claim to be, feminism would cease to be the dominant force by now. Simple maths really, tradcucks are a significant demographic.
/r/MGTOW16/03/18 04:31 PM
2

MGTOW actually makes a difference. A "true unicorn" will support MGTOW becos she cares about the future of men more than her own babies-rabies. That's why no women support MGTOW
/r/MGTOW16/03/18 04:18 PM
1

Right or wrong, it's what a society that claims to be for equality should be saying.
/r/MGTOW15/03/18 11:49 PM
6

stop givin her attention
/r/MGTOW15/03/18 06:50 PM
10

you come in here for 2 minutes and already you kicked up a shitstorm drama that's all about you lemme guess, this is the part you blame the guy
/r/MGTOW15/03/18 05:32 PM
7

"Hggggnnnnnggg Gorgeous babe!" " Omggggzzz I would drink your bath water!" Some are really funny though. Especially the indians who can't spell
/r/MGTOW15/03/18 05:24 PM
0

and someone truly going their own way wouldn't high-five and circle jerk over the suffering of people who make a choice they regret. fun to laugh at tho
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 07:56 PM
1

True... the world before zeroth wave used to be a sane place. Still gynocentric, but sane.
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 05:29 PM
1

for fun, I spammed her back with nonsense for 15 minutes straight then asked her why she ignored me
/r/askTRP14/03/18 05:04 PM
1

I do believe it though, it definitely is possible. Though I also believe by the time they become really good at it, they won't be on TRP anymore.
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 04:57 PM
3

near-Wall/post-Wall women will play the Red Pill card while shoving their tits in your face while talking about God. Funny how they never support the MGTOW cause. Even though MGTOW is the only thing that's freaking society out. It's actually working. Still waiting for the first women to support/encourage MGTOW
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 04:41 PM
1

as mothers were the ones upsetting the old definitions of adult interesting theory. And we know women have always wanted to demonize older men going for younger women. This does make sense, though I should also add that "girlfriend" seems to imply girls wanting to drag marriage for as long as possible to maximize their hypergamous instincts.
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 03:05 PM
1

True, much of this is has to do with the invention of the concept of adolescents. It's quite a recent phenomenon: for thousands of years humanity is either children, or they are "of age". The term girlfriend apparently originated in the mid-1800s, which is also when "zeroth wave" feminism (my term for the purposes of this comment) in the form of the tender years doctrine (giving the custody of young children to the mother by default rather than to the father as was normal (because only he is res…
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 12:26 PM
1

he is constantly offending and drawing fire from feminist I mean, complementarians don't get their $$$ from feminists. True courage will be to offend the "non-feminist"/"trad-con" women among his fanbase who, make no mistake, play a huge part in shaping the FI for conservative-leaning Christians. FI =/= feminism And here we come to the heart of the matter: this sub don't seem to tell the difference between FI and feminism.
/r/RPChristians14/03/18 10:01 AM
1

(I'm not gonna respond to the rest becos lol this topic has been beaten more than the deadest dead horse) Find a woman who believes in Marriage 1.0 and is committed to it This is funny though. A woman who believes in Marriage 1.0 .... is still gonna get married under Marriage 2.0 laws. LOL? Oh but if we're talking about Marriage 0.0 (hereby defined as running off to a hill and marrying in front of God, like in the movie Braveheart) then yeah, that might be worth a discussion. OP seems to be have…
/r/RPChristians14/03/18 09:49 AM
1

Excitement? I see frustration. Frustration at a man who claims to not work for the Feminine Imperative, only to time and again do exactly that. Some interesting quotes from the comments, first by Princeasbel: Except that this fault of Wilson’s is an obvious intentional one. We saw that with his latest article on masculinity (Masculinity without Permission). He can see the havoc wreaked by his own teachings of servant leadership- he’s not ignorant. But that won’t stop him from obfuscating like he…
/r/RPChristians14/03/18 09:13 AM
1

Of course it does. 'Teen' is one of the most searched porn terms online
/r/MGTOW14/03/18 08:48 AM
1

Dalrock and friends just launched a fresh round against our Doug https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/03/12/if-you-only-knew-wilson-like-they-know-wilson-you-would-know-he-does-not-mean-what-he-writes/ https://canecaldo.wordpress.com/2018/03/13/for-the-record/ more gold in the comments. Quite hilarious really lol
/r/RPChristians14/03/18 01:58 AM
1

This sub will say: marry! Me: don't! It's clear you don't want to. Marriage 2.0 is never worth it anyway But As a man I know I should live by my values Well said. For what is a man who goes against his own values? Make no mistake, if you marry, you're admitting defeat. I won't be able to look myself in the mirror if I married just like that.
/r/RPChristians13/03/18 11:57 PM
2

I don't know mate, I'm not American. I can still cold approach like a boss ;) for now... I was hoping one of you can update me on the situation there. Not the celebrity/famous people situation, I mean the situation for the everyday Joe like us.
/r/RPChristians13/03/18 10:02 PM
7

Incorrectly using the term pedo is rampant and damaging. But the feminists have to use this word. Without it they lose all justification to demonize older men going for younger women. "Teen sex" just doesn't sound as bad as "pedophile". Women/feminists will twist whichever word that has the most power ("abuse", "rape", "misogyny") to achieve their goals.
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 09:33 PM
22

This "pedo-hysteria"** is a really annoying Anglosphere thing. You tell them that so and so girl is legal in your country, they don't care. She's below MY age of consent, so you're a pedophile I DON'T CARE!!!!!1 Okay, then let's have an 18 year old legal-everywhere-around-the-world girl, sleep with a 50 year old man. Oh what - that's wrong too?? Let me guess.... he's a gasp pedophile too?! Admit it, you will never "feel comfortable" until both parties fulfill the feminist "Half your age + 7" bul…
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 08:57 PM
5

The point was that empathy is not a rational reaction to people who have made their own bed. It makes even less sense when you consider that it is us, men, who were the primary victims while these women were making their bed. As such, our instinct of self-preservation should have naturally kicked in and overwrite any "empathy" there is for our still-present-oppressors; that is, had the oppressors/secondary victims been any gender other than female. Not sure how you missed this point. Even more n…
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 08:57 PM
2

So I went up to her and told her that I thought she was cute and introduced myself You did a "cold approach"? Today, in 2018 America, after #MeToo? I would think the social climate there since #MeToo is making cold approach a risky endeavour. Some in TRP are reconsidering it too (unless of course you're not American...)
/r/RPChristians13/03/18 08:07 PM
9

women do not care about truth, only consensus.
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 07:50 PM
2

i don't understand the mutual hate. "TRP" and "MGTOW" used to be the same thing like 10 years ago. How else do you "take the red pill", if not by going your own way and defining your own success? We are men going our own way by forging our own identities and paths to self-defined success; cutting through collective ideas of what a man is. I don't see which part of this dictates that we must cut off all interaction with women. Only that we should see past female bullshit and make our own choices …
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 07:44 PM
8

it's almost like it's the reputation of the group, not the individual, that secures her what she wants (marriage and commitment)
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 07:28 PM
2

wait one more year, legal in more than half the world
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 07:23 PM
7

Neither do we. But it's not "empathy" to sympathize with modern women, for all the reasons you mentioned above. Rather, it more probably is just gynocentrism and our natural horror at even the thought of female suffering
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 05:55 PM
6

Why are you even "almost sympathetic" when women clearly are only concerned that women are suffering?
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 05:47 PM
1

Everyone and anyone can be demonized. Jordan Peterson just haven't really got on their nerves yet. I suspect they threw Cathy Newman at him to boost his PR.
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 05:40 PM
5

#MeToo might just be the best thing ever
/r/MGTOW13/03/18 02:57 PM
1

I've seen a few of your comments The Red Pill has nothing to do with which gender supports the family. In fact, read The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar to find out that the whole "women=domestic, men=public" trope is really just gynocentrism and female manipulation.
/r/RPChristians12/03/18 06:53 PM
2

the comments there aren't that bad tho
/r/MGTOW12/03/18 05:03 AM
1

you can still just don't marry those uneducated women. The two are not mutually exclusive. EDIT: never heard a tradcuck advocating for less education for women. They usually go "feminism has gone too far! BUT....."
/r/MGTOW11/03/18 06:44 PM
1

that the crusades have been seriously misunderstood, misrepresented, and maligned. Not RP, more history: "The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise Book" by Dario Fernandez Morera, is a good read to expose the anti-Christian, pro-everything-not-Christian bias within mainstream academia. To be honest, the "Alt-Right" is a lot more updated about Spiritual Warfare than Christians today. Which is pretty sad
/r/RPChristians11/03/18 07:05 AM
1

... nobody, Dalrock nor me, said that Doug didn't have good things to say. Even the bluest of blue pill pastors have good things to say. Again, that's not the point.
/r/RPChristians11/03/18 06:42 AM
1

The link above? I'm not sure what you're asking, but I'll try my best to answer. The "idea" of complementarianism, by itself, technically isn't wrong. The Bible does portray men and women's respective roles as 'complimenting' of each other. But it's not that simple. Rather, when the Manosphere talks about "Complimentarians", what we are referring to is the bluepill Christians who want to obey the Bible a little, but yet also do not want to offend modern women too much either. So they go to painf…
/r/RPChristians10/03/18 07:25 PM
1

But still very direct to the women. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/category/complementarian/ Rules of a Complementarian: -Be direct to women -Criticize feminism -Subtlely shift all the blame and responsibilities onto men. Pervert the Word of God if necessary -NEVER offend the Feminine Imperative. Quote of the day: Aha! I knew Dalrock was holding out on me! Sure they teach some terrible things, but they teach some good things too! Then you might be a complementarian.
/r/RPChristians10/03/18 09:28 AM
1

but his focus is on God's word, not being a red pill purist. Same thing they said about every single pastor out there Though I think there's a lot of opportunity there for him. Opportunity to do what, exactly? He had more than enough opportunities throughout his career to wage war on the Feminine Imperative; yet time and again he comes back to blaming men for all the failures in society today (like Feminism does), and time and again he refuses to call out the rebellion of modern women. That is e…
/r/RPChristians10/03/18 09:02 AM
1

Dalrock dedicated more nearly ten posts to him alone. Not really interested in listening to his crap after what I saw. It's funny though, there's an army of fanboys defending Doug over at Dalrock's... and they're doing a terrible job. Horrible arguments all round: "He's not THAT bad!" or "He's trying his best!" "Have you read ALL of Doug Wilson?" none of them even comes close to the point Dalrock was driving at.
/r/RPChristians10/03/18 08:52 AM
1

It matters not what we call them. What does matter is that he is working for the Feminine Imperative, while tricking Christians into doing so as well.
/r/RPChristians10/03/18 01:34 AM
1

Doug Wilson is a disgustingly blue pill Complementarian disguising as 'redpill' https://dalrock.wordpress.com/category/pastor-doug-wilson/
/r/RPChristians09/03/18 10:45 PM
3

apparently she's doing political videos now. Anti-feminism and all that, quite famous too! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVspgkYbJl4&feature=youtu.be who would've thought? lol
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 06:29 PM
3

lol haven't heard that name in like 10 years
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 05:54 PM
5

lmao xiaxue
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 11:39 AM
5

I never made that connection. Yep, because the picture of men being forced to do anything goes against the mainstream narrative that men are the privileged ones who can apparently do anything and get away with anything. It also completely blows out of the water the common feminist narrative that traditional marriages is oppressive to women.
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 10:15 AM
6

Actually, I have friends from Islamic Extremist places, tell me that Islam is actually a more Matriarchal society than we might imagine. It makes sense. Islam allows 4 women to share an Alpha. This means for every 1 "Alpha", 3 men are incels. So the 3 incels are sent to Jihad, blow themselves up etc. The remaining society is heavily populated by women, and so all the rules of society that the remaining "Alphas" make must naturally cater to the overwhelming majority of females. Including throwing…
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 09:19 PM
4

I already know it's Pastor Steven Anderson before clicking the link because he's perhaps the ONLY PASTOR IN THE ENTIRE WORLD right now who dares offend women Sad sad times
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 09:04 PM
1

The mainstream war against Christianity Sorry I meant to say: the mainstream academia/scholarship war against Christianity
/r/RPChristians08/03/18 08:56 PM
6

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/ Beware the Complementarian pastors. They can be even more cucked than egalitarians. At least egalitarians try to be equal.
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 07:24 PM
2

Meh, I have no desire to read about the Crusades. But you are right, I'm sure there were True Christians involved. The reason he linked you the book, is so that you might start seeing the Crusaders as the 'real' Christians, and those today as "mehh, there MIGHT be some True Christians today". The mainstream war against Christianity is one of the deeper rabbit holes that we all eventually have to go into, anyway.
/r/RPChristians08/03/18 07:00 PM
2

only to fall by the wayside in 40 years from women Actually, "The Church Impotent" by Leon J. Podles traces the feminizing of the church back to ~1100AD Middle Ages. This rabbit hole is a lot deeper than most here may wanna admit
/r/RPChristians08/03/18 06:52 PM
1

There's a TRP theory that women get a power-trip just by showing others that she has cucked her husband. Bonus points if the child is 'ethnic' so she can virtue signal her charity
/r/RPChristians07/03/18 08:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter