PART 1: ESCHATOLOGY OF THE REDPILL ORTHODOXY/PREAMBLE

Buckle your seatbelts, we are going on a field trip. It’s going to be a long one. By the way, I am not saying anything new here. However, what I am saying needs to be said, and must be said in greater strength.

The Redpill is an awakening from feminism. It’s the symbolic “baptism” of the Redpill. The “Great Redpill Sin” the individual is baptized from is the sin of feminism. “Unplugging” from the “feminist matrix” is the beginning of the individual understanding how far feminism has been rooted in his psyche and working to remove it. It is Neo out of the machine, realizing how much of his life has been a lie.

As Biblical Christians, we know that feminism is real sin. Feminism is a reversal of the social order God has ordained and the fulfillment of female sin in Genesis 3:16.

But a baptism into what? You have gone from the land of feminism, and into the promise land—which is where and what exactly?

“Ah yes!” Cries the Feminist-Redpill, “but the Redpill is only a set of tools for you to work with, it does not lead anywhere in particular and its tools are “amoral,” and/or morally neutral, willing to be picked up and used as the user desires.”

“Yet, do you not observe the issue?” Say I. “How clear is it! That the user of those tools is still in the matrix? That the fangs of feminism still have a draw over his mind? That though he has begun to live as if he is not of the world, he is still in the world.” He is yet to be removed from the matrix.

Does a carpenter only teach his son to use the tools? And leaves him there and lets him free to build whatever creations he so desires? These creations reflecting the immaturity of his creator? Does not the father also teach his son how to build a table? A chair? A house for his family?

Does he then not go on to teach his son how to raise a family in that house? Does he not teach the son what that house is for?

Furthermore, does not the son indeed construct some-thing, even though his father has only taught him to use power tools? A son will not just sit there and do nothing. But in his ignorance, he constructs something ignorant. Why teach a man to fish, if he does not know why he ought to?

“But nay!” Says the Redpill. “That is everyman’s choice and freewill, to construct as he must and as he can!”

“Him who knows not and steeped in ignorance,” say I. “Knows only to build feminism. For though the boy may come to know the tools of a man, and the ancient lumber a man uses, he does not know the house of a man.”

Imagine if Morpheus taught Neo all those sweet kungfu moves[navigating the SMP], all that crazy building jumping[preselection] and shooting[alpha triats] and dodging[AM]. But never bothered to give him a vision? Imagine if Morpheus just left him there and said, “now you know the wisdom of those who see that the Matrix is a lie, go and do as you will.” And then left smoking a blunt.

“But the vision of every man is his own choice,” says the Redpill.

Not to a Christian. On the micro-scale, it may be. But our over arching goal is defined by our Commander and Chief The One True God, and therefore our daily to “micro” goals are influenced by this “Macro” goal. Sexually, our goal is marriage.

Our “Morpheuses,” those Great Awakeners, the “top posters,” meanwhile, go and use their abilities to become CEOs and generals and hypergamous “Chads” in the hierarchy of the Matrix, they live it up. That is their vision. Forget destroying the matrix, we are going to live it up!

What is Neo to do but to follow Morpheus? He knows not what else to do! Maybe a few “Neos,” here and there, realize, but most will not. They may realize that their leaders follow the path of hedonism, self-destruction, and compromising with the enemy, the enemy which is feminism.

Why? Because the current “Macro” goal of the Redpill is to achieve the greatest pleasure. It is sex as only sex. A tool. Sex without purpose, without discipline, without an end, a telos, a clear eschatology.

“But aren’t women whores? Do they not desire to sleep around with the most Alpha male, not matter how faithful and good? What are else are we to do? But sleep around an enjoy?” Replies the Redpill.

“And is that not all sin?” Cries the Christian-Redpill.

“Aye, you are right” say I. “Women are sinners—but do not men wish to sleep and struggle not to lust after the most beautiful woman in the room, regardless of how true and faithful? And is that not sin? Do you not see that we are one and the same? Sinners? That our struggle is one that is meant to be together? Fighting against both of our unfaithfulness. That our goal, our example, is that of Jesus Christ who holds faith though we are unfaithful? That though we are not perfect and that we cannot reach perfection, we strive towards it as if we are and could because It lives in us?”

“Are you telling us to man up and marry those sluts?” Cry the Redpill.

“No,” say I. “But I am telling you that if All Women are Sluts, then by that standard all Men must be Whores. And if that standard is true, which I do not believe it is (well kind of), we are the stronger sex, and one side will have to bear the burden of sin.”

“Do you not see? O’ Great Redpill,” I continue. “That though you realize that feminism procures and rationalizes a social-situation for women to slut around, YOU IN TURN rationalize ‘slutting around’ yourself? You realize that there is something wrong with women, yet you act the same. You’re no better than a woman!”

Do you now see? Are your eyes opened? That the Orthodox Redpill, those Vanguards, Top Posters, are the poster boys of the ideal male feminist? I go further! They are the ideal Marxists.

For the woman says, “men are sinners and will be harsh with me (men break the Law found in Colossians 3:19 and fulfilling Genesis 3:16), therefore I will not marry.” The man says, “women are sinners and will be unfaithful and attempt to usurp my authority (fulfilling Proverbs 31:10, Ecclesiastes 7:28, and Genesis 3:16), therefore I will not marry.”

For Feminism, which is a vanguard of Marxism, is the castration of Western Civilization. You cannot raise a child outside of family. You cannot perpetuate civilization without strong families. The sane believe it is impossible to work against this principle. The depraved, the Marxist and feminists, however, believe they can. They are wrong, and we will pay dearly for it.

You cannot have family without monogamy.

PART 2: A BROOD OF CYPHERS

I will go further!

But do you not see,

the trouble with the SMP?

-poet

The SMP is the holistic framework of the game the Redpill teaches us to play. The trouble with the SMP is that it doesn’t change anything, it only addresses the current state of affairs.

Who is the primary determiner of value in the SMP? If you can bag lots of women, men are drawn to you, because they want to learn, and women are drawn to you because they are drawn to the hierarchy. That is its primary premise. Why do you buy new clothes? Because women like fashionable things (also signifies that you can provide). SMV goes up. Why do you clean your room? Because it makes it look nice—for a woman. SMV goes up. Why do you make more money? Because women are genetically predisposed to selecting a mate that can provide the most. Why do you stop playing LoL and go climb a mountain and get a new hobby? Because sitting in your basement isn’t fun—for a woman. (Side note: alternatively this is commonly replaced with the self-oriented notion of “I do things because they are fun for me, women just happen to like them.” Ergo, hedonism.)

Furthermore, what’s the point of the SMV? The basic economic unit? Sex and only sex. Do you realize there is a problem here? That there must be an end to sex beyond itself? Else we end up in the culture-ending hedonism the Redpill has found itself in?

Furthermore, what does the concept of SMP change? Nothing. Not a single thing. It gives you those supermoves that Morpheus taught you. It teaches that there is a matrix and you have the power to manipulate it. Like those other “Chads” or “unwoke” drones who have made it to the top by sheer chance and biology, you too now have the ability to be like them. Great, good for you. You really want to be at the top of a civilization that is ritually committing suicide day after day, do ya?

What nobody is telling you to do is break the system. Break your chains you slaves! Fathers and sons, the SMP will take your wives, daughters, and sisters and turns them into whores. Take a look at the stats, or in the local mall, it is the truth. Or the front page of the Redpill. You want your daughter marrying those guys?

Do not just use the “supermoves” or the knowledge of the SMP to your own gain! Use this knowledge to find evil in the hopes of breaking the SMP yourself! Do you not see that most of us have only become the Cyphers in this whole great metaphor!

THE GREAT DECEPTION

“Do we not have to seduce a women in order to marry her? Do I not have to spark her lust?” Says the Christian Redpill. “Are not the women the gatekeepers of sex?”

Women are not the gatekeepers of sex. This is a lie. A heresy. In a feminist culture, they are the gatekeepers of sex. In a feminist framework, they should be the gatekeepers of sex. In the SMP, they are the gatekeepers of sex.

But we are not here to behave by the SMP.

Do you see what this does to men? In order to get sex, men innately and biologically understand that good men (men that are good at being men) get sex. Faced with rejection, which is what brought us all here, we conform to the fancies of a woman, a girl. Frankly, a woman is a terrible individual to be deciding what is best for a man. That is a terrible criteria to conform ourselves to, as we have seen with many of our mothers.

Note: there are parts of the natural hierarchy our society has developed, the SMP, which is alright. But again, any male to male value is largely determined by the man’s ability to bag a woman or his popularity. We live in a democracy after all.

Do you have to spark a woman’s lust to marry her? No. You have to spark her lust to have sex with her.

The Bible destroys woman’s gatekeeping in a single verse, don’t ya know? (Credit, again, goes to Cane.)

“If you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife.” (Deut 21:11)