TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wiiboy95 Archive

View 5 posts and 139 comments by Wiiboy95 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

A large amount of the expense comes from proving that they are guilty though. When the state is seeking the death penalty, their case needs to be airtight, as you can’t rescind a death sentence has been carried out. If we were to lower this standard, it would lead to innocent people being executed by the state.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:17 PM
2

So you’d rather pay much more to kill them? I know they’re bad people but that’s pretty spiteful
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:53 PM
2

why do we pay to keep murderers alive in jail? If you look at it from a purely financial perspective, the argument is still against the death penalty, as the extra legal procedures mean it costs more to execute someone than it does to imprison them for life.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:40 AM
29

Here is a statement from NOW, the National Organisation of Women, opposing shared custody of children. Shared custody is a keystone issue for the MRM, and here is the largest feminist organisation in the USA directly opposing us on it. Don't try to tell us that feminism is trying to help us. ​ (Oh, and before you blame "patriarchy" for women being considered primary caregivers, you may wish to read up on the Tender Years Doctrine, a legal principle pushed for by proto-feminist women, which cemen…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:36 PM
3

Kind of hard to treat it as satire when the author tried to kill andy worhol
/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:09 AM
3

Despite this, domestic and sexual violence against men is inexplicably classified as "Violence against women and girls"
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:55 AM
2

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:17 PM
5

That quote is exactly what I'm talking about. He gives examples as to why the disparity im attitudes between men and women cannot be entirely down to social factors, including the rather damning statement that a man raised as a woman will still act more like a man than a woman.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:09 PM
30

the differences between men and women are due to society not biology He literally countered that in the memo. How did this guy miss that?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:30 AM
39

Why are we posting this anti-trans bullshit in this sub? If you want to deny the seriousness of gender dysphoria and the efficacy of its treatment, head on over to /r/gendercritical. This has nothing to do with advocating for the legal and social equality of men and boys.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:15 AM
11

It's not like most people are gonna bother to check. Her supporters will love her even more now cause they believe that "teh evul menz" are lying about her, and because she told them, they'll never bother to find out the truth for themselves.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 11:34 AM
13

Were you expecting her to be honest?
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:47 AM
10

I mean, planning and organizing an entire office working on several projects at once is a full time job, planning the chores for a single, 4 person household isn't
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:41 PM
6

objective links to return of kings Sure buddy, now let me go get you some crayons so you don't get bored when the grown ups talk
/r/MensRights29/05/17 01:08 AM
5

The sentencing gap for gender is 6 times larger than the racial sentencing gap, so if you're going to argue it's racism, it's almost certainly sexism too
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:49 PM
7

Oh look, an article telling people what "real" men and "real" women are. Pass
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:46 PM
1

Of course someone's identity affects it. If I told you Jeremy Fisher used the word "nigger" on twitter, you probably wouldn't care, but if I told you Donald Trump used it, suddenly it's important
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:55 PM
1

"There is nothing harmful with treating women like dogs" I'm done here. There's no purpose trying to reason with you.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:30 PM
1

Ok, in a very literal sense, RoK has advocated for treating women like dogs http://www.returnofkings.com/76347/10-things-my-dog-taught-me-about-women and regularly recommends techniques that border on abusive. I don't think it's acceptable to treat anyone like that, so I cannot condone association with RoK.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:05 AM
1

You... you do realise that's the subreddit's splash text, right? If you disagree with that, you might want to reconsider your identity as an MRA
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:40 PM
0

You... you do realise that's the subreddit's splash text, right? If you disagree with that, you might want to reconsider your identity as an MRA
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:39 PM
1

But hoping it happens isn't really becoming of people who "advocate for the social and legal equality of men and boys"
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:18 PM
1

I'm not threatened by ideas, but if I saw a homeless guy on the street yelling about how the government replaced his teeth with martian eggs, I'm gonna give him a wide berth, and i'm not gonna sit there to listen if he says anything sensible.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:44 PM
1

where does it say that The article clearly says that the organisation merely takes claims and broadcasts them. They even apologised and said that they were tricked. Did you even read the article? Again, you seem to be wishing bad things on this person when they have done nothing to harm you. Why is that? You literally said that you hope that he gets screwed over for a false rape claim. You are wishing injustice onto him much more than he is. Why do you think this is acceptable behaviour for some…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:25 AM
2

Assuming he believes what they say, he isn't supporting the people who made up the lie, but instead the people who were misled into supporting it. That's, at worst, misguided but not an awful offence. Even then, would it still be ok to deny him rights and hope for injustice? We should be better than that
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:36 AM
13

Can we not have this attitude that people deserve to have crimes committed against them because they disagree with us? We should be fighting for everyone's rights, not just our own
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:29 PM
2

"some stuff is ok" That hardly excuses them from the sheer mountain of garbage they put out on a regular basis patriarchy is superior these three examples prove that women have lost touch with reality The government got rid of dueling to limit our independence all pulled by just scrolling the front page. Are these really people that anyone should be listening to?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 05:27 PM
1

In terms of the economy, Theresa May's repeated insistance that "no deal is better than a bad deal" flies in the face of pretty much every economist that has written on the subject. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/23/eu-trade-deal-theresa-may-brexit-divorce In terms of human rights, Theresa May's government has passed the Psychoactive Substances Act, the Investigatory Powers act, and is currently sitting on the Digital Economy act. Each of which represents a blow to the rights…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:15 PM
1

Wow, just look at that political insight
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:50 AM
1

Yes, I'd rather have literally anyone else in power than Theresa May, who was shown blatant disregard for the economy and the rights of british citizens
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:47 AM
1

conservative lucky Lulwut?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 11:07 PM
2

my point stands. this post and the resulting discussion has no place on /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:36 PM
2

allow me to rephrase: Why are you posting this here? it's utterly irrelavent to the subreddit. Why not post it in /r/GenderCritical or somewhere else more appropriate?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:25 PM
2

the article literally describes the child's condition as a delusion. You may not think of that as hatred, but is sure isn't friendly
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:15 PM
2

If you want to criticise trans people based on the baseless assumptions you have made regarding the nature of their condition, may I suggest that /r/mensrights is the wrong place to do it? This has nothing to do with advocating for the legal and social equality of men and boys.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:51 PM
2

When did "men deserve equal rights" become "fuck trans people, gender dysphoria isn't real"?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:34 PM
3

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:44 PM
5

according to this report equal pay day was actually january 3rd. Whoops!
/r/MensRights04/04/17 11:41 AM
1

it's almost like gender dysphoria is a legitimate mental condition or something...
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:37 AM
26

Let me put it like this. If having full custody of the children in a divorce is not a net positive, then women are free to decline custody. They don't (in the vast majority of cases), so one can assume it's a net positive.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 11:30 AM
44

Trying to paint women as the victims because they win custody cases is the most ridiculous spin possible.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 11:10 AM
35

I'd like to see the stats for this
/r/MensRights25/02/17 01:59 PM
0

Be that as it may, it's still a tenuous link at best. There are certainly better places to post this than r/mensrights
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:59 PM
1

This has nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights13/01/17 11:18 AM
2

If beating the shit out of people is the sort of thing you find funny, i'm glad you have no more intention of talking to me.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:29 PM
4

I have no intention of being allied with anyone who says "sometimes you need to smack a bitch up"
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:18 PM
4

Go back to r/theredpill, you edgelord.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:39 PM
1

Please don't associate us with the red pill or RoK.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 01:33 AM
29

the problem is that, if this belief becomes widely accepted, it adds another lie to the pile that feminists use to gish gallop when they argue that women are oppressed. The other thing is that, often, those who oversee companies or large sections of companies don't have the expertise that the day-to-day workers need. For example, Reggie Fils-Amie, current COO of Nintendo, previously worked at Pizza Hut and had little to no experience of game developement when he joined Nintendo at an executive l…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:53 PM
100

presumably the damage of a whole load of people now believing something that is demostrably false.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:08 PM
3

I never said conviction means guilt. However, the headline claims that he was convicted of misogyny when he clearly wasn't. He was convicted of other, very serious crimes. If you want to dispute the veracity of those convictions, I won't stop you, but the title and the entire article are still clickbait trash.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 04:04 PM
16

He was convicted on charges of sexual assault, blackmail, voyeurism, theft and fraud against three victims Literally convicted of actual serious crimes. Please don't post stupid bait.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:51 PM
1

They compare men getting raped to any form of sexual assault against women, then act shocked at how much bigger the number is for women
/r/MensRights18/10/16 10:19 AM
2

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:31 PM
3

You can call it satire all you want, but it still remains as utterly lacking in point, relevance or humour
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:23 PM
1

What has he done that aligns with MRAs, exactly? All i've heard from him is red pill nonsense
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:06 PM
2

I mean, you can show evidence for a negative. RooshV has written multiple articles where he explicitly states he's not an MRA. That's pretty much all you really need.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:31 PM
10

I presume that she came to his door, he said no, so she called the cops
/r/MensRights16/08/16 02:52 PM
30

If you read the article, it's clear he didn't let her stay with him.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 02:45 PM
7

Pray tell, what's the difference?
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:27 AM
2

Two testimonies from witnesses, testimony of the complainant, matching injuries on the complainant, the fact the complainant was found passed out in an alleyway while he was performing the sex act and only gained consciousness at hospital, and the fact the defendant couldn't keep his story straight and had to make up a bunch of bullshit. Again, I applaud skepticism, but all the evidence is in the complainants favour and none is for the defendant.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 11:52 AM
2

That was the testimony of the guy that saw him. Presumably he was above her when he was fingering her. I didn't mean to imply he'd done anything else, but to draw attention to the fact that she was passed out while he was doing it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 11:48 AM
9

Yes, yes you are. I'm fine with skepticism, but in this case, he took a black out drunk girl outside, removed her clothes and fingered her without consent. When the witnesses came, he was literally humping her while she was unconscious. If you have any evidence to the contrary, i'd like to hear it, but with 2 witnesses and corresponding injuries on the victim, and the defendent giving some of the most unbelievable stories told in a courtroom, i'd say this case is pretty cut and dried.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:34 AM
19

Did you actually read the statement? It's incredibly emotionally charged, and I resent large sections of it for using emotional blackmail to argue against reasonable constructs like testimony for the defendant and even hiding the complainants name from the press. However, I cannot accept anyone feeling it's a good idea to mock it in such a way. It's comments like this that give the MRM a bad name. I'm not concern trolling, i just think you're a prick.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:30 AM
30

That's probably because a single sexual assault, as horrible as it is, is a different order of magnitude to killing whole groups of people, and it's hardly just muslims that get that sort of attention. Sandy hook, that kid who shot up a church and virginia tech all got massive coverage. Hell, in san bernadino, large swathes of the media were convinced that san bernadino was committed by some right wing NRA white man right up until the suspects names were announced
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:24 AM
3

Buy a meninist t-shirt or hoodie. If she gives you shit for it, ask her why it's ok for her to wear her t-shirt but not ok for you to wear yours
/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:17 AM
10

That was back in 2004 though, when this sort of "activism" wasn't nesrly as prolific. These people genuinely believe trump is the new hitler. One of them went so far as to assault him on stage.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:13 AM
5

Can we put the video for this in the wiki/sidebar so it doesn't get reposted every two weeks?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 10:53 PM
73

Once again, teaching the world that it's ok to discriminate, as long as the victim is a man
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:53 PM
7

how is this relevent to men's issues?
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:24 PM
5

r/mensrants
/r/MensRights22/02/16 08:07 AM
3

The definition specifically mentions men, when it really doesn't need to. It's cosmo killing 2 birds with one stone by slandering gun owners and men.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:05 PM
1

Return of Kings is not someone you want to be associated with. They have compared women to toddlers and dogs in the past. Thankfully, they have also denied, multiple times, that they are MRAs. My advice when anyone links RoK with us is to find the article where they say they aren't MRAs and show them that.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:13 AM
0

Even if this one was false, that still leaves the cologne attacks, which i believe have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Innocent until proven guilty for sure, but acting like this one case being false means the whole scandal was fabricated is a bit silly.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:18 PM
5

you'd have to stick your head in the sand duluth model to consider IPV a gendered problem. FTFY
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:08 AM
2

I don't think it's that people have an issue with the suggestion initially being rejected (it's a surprise to me that it got in at all). Most people's problems stem from her refusal to listen to Phillip Davies and her argument against the idea being "well there's lots of men in politics therefore men have no troubles in their lives whatsoever"
/r/MensRights12/11/15 08:17 AM
-5

As stupid as her actions were, this article is basically just a dox disguised as journalism. Can we please not do anything stupid to this girl? Being the fall guy for a nationwide controversy is probably punishment enough
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:31 AM
1

Rape trials may not require evidence, but it is still the task of the prosecution to prove the case, and for the prosecution to rely on nothing but the testimony of the complainant generally will not work. In the UK, the CPS decides whether or not a case is worth prosecuting, and they won't prosecute if they don't feel the case can be won. That doesn't mean the rape claim is false, it just means that a single testimony might not convince 12 people that it happened beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 09:36 AM
2

I agree that false accusations are a serious problem, however, there's no reason to believe that the false accusation level is 90+ percent. Just because an allegation doesn't make it to trial doesn't mean it is immediately false. Most allegations don't make it to trial simply cause rapes very rarely leave more evidence than an allegation. I was recently on a jury for a rape case. The only evidence submitted was the allegation itself, and 3 sets of text messages. That's how little evidence is fou…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 05:52 PM
8

Yeah, cause that worked so well with emma sulko... Oh wait
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:09 PM
1

It may be slightly pertinent, but compared to actual legal discrimination and actual lies and warped statistics, it's pretty small potatoes about how some characters act in a work of fiction, and even then, is there anything we should do about it? As far as I can tell, not really
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:41 PM
4

can we quit with this film, please? It's just a film, and watching you bitch out over a single film is like watching feminists bitch out over age of ultron or whatever. People side with the MRM cause they realise we have legitimate gender grievences to discuss, and this film is not a pressing issue. A little perspective please.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 11:39 AM
3

Holding women to an equal standard does not mean they are not psychologically distinct. They are psychologically distinct (though not by as much as you seem to think), but what does that have to do with equal rights? I will remind you that we are on /r/MensRights, so the discussion is about equal rights, not gender disparity Oh no! ANYTHING but being called misogynists! Our opinions are frequently dismissed out of hand by accusing us of misogyny. We then have people join when they find out that …
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:50 PM
7

I disagree entirely. The MRM will only succeed if we treat fully grown men and women as equally responsible adults. The reason so many women have bailed on feminism recently is because it's treating them like 5' toddlers. The infantilising, patronising bullshit that TRP spews out will only get us labelled as misogynists (i know that already happens, but TRPs attitudes towards women are pretty unhealthy, so i cannot disagree with anyone calling their views misogynist). "Sexual strategy" has nothi…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:25 PM
1

which is a better way of claiming victory than a shit-slinging match. If you remain calm and collected, your opponent will try more and more ridiculous things to try to get a rise out of you, and when they come back down to earth, they'll realise they lost all their followers due to the nonsense they were spouting
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:18 PM
2

I never thought I'd agree with an article in the national review, yet here I am
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:05 PM
2

why is it that if a woman is called out on saying "kill all men", the reaction is "UGH IT'S JUST A JOKE GET OVER IT!!" whereas if anyone said the opposite then they'd be lynched? Why is one acceptable humour while the other is terrifying hate speech?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:00 PM
-4

i know, i'm downvoting it because it's the fourth time i've seen it on this subreddit
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:32 AM
12

i have to disagree. The rape threats that feminists and similar groups get are all by anonymous trolls on the internet. These people have absolutely no intention of actually raping anyone. While there are surely some people in the world who use the threat of rape as a punishment or disincentive, i'd be surprised if they made up even a significant minority of actual rapists. For the people that post these things on twitter, the number of threats they get is almost certainly uncorrelated to their …
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:10 PM
5

It's not just in prisons, though. Any phenomenon that feminists have linked to rape culture is doubly true for men. This includes a low reporting rate, a low prosecution rate, and the normalisation of rape in mass media.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 05:54 PM
6

With all the straw in this article, it's a pretty big fire hazard.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:42 PM
1

You make it sound like they're making wallets out of them or something...
/r/MensRights15/08/14 10:39 AM
12

It's a sad indictment that the points the MRM makes are only relevant if a woman says them EDIT: correcting my spelling fails.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:34 PM
9

I think the biggest irony for me about anita sarkeesian was that i didn't hear about her from all the "trolls" or the "harassers" but from all the people complaining about the "trolls" and "harassers" I mean, phil fish got more hate than her. She just used the hate as part of her image, whereas phil fish bore it until he snapped and left.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:15 PM
3

The MRAs generally are, the red-pillers at RoK are probably less sympathetic.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:51 AM
2

I don't think i've seen anyone say that we should stop teaching about consent, however, the majority in this sub take the stance that more education about consent than is currently provided will not provide any decrease in sexual assault rates.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 12:14 PM
4

Did anyone here say that they are superior to women? Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 11:45 AM
1

Point 3 of the response really annoyed me. Getting so drunk you can barely stand is going to leave you in a vulnerable situation, and if you were the one drinking the alcohol, then it is your responsibility that you are in such a vulnerable position. If someone had sex without your consent while you were in such a condition, they're still a rapist, but you can't just absolve yourself of personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:18 AM
13

If an innocent dies, that's undue force.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:06 AM
1

At which point i'd ask them what biases they have against them.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:29 PM
4

The irony of this is that men have by far more evidence of systematic discrimination then women.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 08:57 AM
-1

My point is that he's indicating that we should consider the left our enemies, when the enemy is a particular ideology held mostly by people in the left. Gender norms are a problem MRAs have to deal with as well as feminists, and gender norms are normally instigated by the right. I have no love for the pro-censorship, reverse discrimination assholes on the far left, but I also have no love for the homophobic, traditionalist tosspots on the far right.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:41 PM
-2

My MHRM views and my party political views are completely separate. That's mainly because the MHRM isn't mainstream enough for the parties to pick sides on it. I'm against UKIP because I'm pro gay marriage, I believe the UK should stay in the EU, and I think repealing the Human Rights act would be a dick move. None of that is connected to my views as an MRA
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:41 PM
4

The thought of these people having influence in parliament terrifies me. The entire party is filled with the people who's views were to extreme and right wing for the conservatives.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:14 PM
1

The only problem with that is i'd never want to be associated with feminists.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:00 AM
1

Did she have Daniel fucking Kaffee as her lawyer or something?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 08:07 AM
1

I actually kinda like long live the queen...
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:41 AM
0

False rumour. Hitler ate meat like the rest of us who aren't vegetarian
/r/MensRights03/01/14 10:35 AM
5

The thing about occi was there was a sodding point to it. An online form allowing people to register a sexual assualt charge anonymously removes the risk of a false accusation charge, thereby removing the incentive to not make a false claim, and also strips the accused of fundamental rights. While i found the method a bit callous (and totally disagree with anyone who used an actual person's name), I believe that anyone who filed an obviously satirical claim (ie: the ones filed against inanimate …
/r/MensRights26/12/13 10:30 AM
1

The first thing that jumps to my head is yukkii from mirai nikki
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:00 AM
5

Oh wow, she's got a BA in communications, she must be a highly qualified expert!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:28 PM
7

then get an opt in porn blocker rather than letting people force their narrow minded and ultimately stupid opinions on the rest of us
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:23 PM
2

That sounds fair, it's not like women use roads, garbage collection services, public schools, police forces or public areas /s
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:37 AM
6

Do you guys remember due process? I miss due process
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:42 AM
7

Ok, assuming you're correct that games with damsel in distress tropes teach their messages even if games with murder don't (which is false). Let's think about the message these games are sending. I'm fairly certain it's not "women are weak". Think of how many times the game shows the protagonist getting his ass kicked by the antagonist in a cutscene early on (almost every zelda game does this, as do most of the 3D mario games). These serve to demonstrate that, at the point when the damsel is cap…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:24 AM
33

We can't get pregnant without assistance so if you don't want to feel trapped where a condom. A woman deliberately lies about being on birth control specifically to trap a man and you blame the man because he didn't use a johnny? That sounds an awful lot like victim blaming to me.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 08:57 PM
3

I believe these stats were published in a paper from the gender studies department at the university of the human anus.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 07:38 AM
10

welcome to feminism, where your achievements don't matter, only your gender
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:03 PM
7

Drunk consensual sex is not rape don'tbethatgirl
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:59 AM
2

The gap between equal candidates of differing gender is so small to be within margin of error, therefore, it is entirely valid to say that there is no wage gap.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:42 PM
0

I know, I'm fed up of my doctor telling me what's wrong with MY body. I'm all like "What do you know? Your 7 years of med school don't matter! You don't know my feels! You don't have to live as i do!" The worst part is he's a fat shamer too. I once saw (and by saw I mean imagined) him telling a morbidly obese woman that it'd be a good medical decision to lose weight. WHAT AN OPPRESSIVE SHITLORD!!!1!1!!ONE!!!
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:14 PM
0

You can feel the misogyny and privilege oozing from these doctors as they save these wymmyn's lives.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:51 PM
7

There's a moment in the story when the dull-witted lackey seems to call the mad scientist on his crappy ideas about women. "Ah, you know, that's not very politically correct," he says when the scientist explains why they need a lady's DNA. The scientist shrugs off his concern: "So what? We're the bad guys." The tone is sly, the exchange is knowing, and the faux-naifery is at full throttle. Pilkey, rather than imply that his characters are wrong in their beliefs, doubles down on their being right…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:32 PM
37

True, but only idiots classify that as rape either. If you're in a hospital to have a child removed, you're going to have to expect that the doctors might want to have a look inside you every now and again.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:25 PM
48

You're no longer allowed to suggest that men can possibly be better at anything for any reason, but it's practically mandatory to fly in the face of evidence to say that women are better than men. On a side note, I look forward to the day when this "women must be better than men" line becomes so ingrained in our culture that a feminist suggests that women should compete against men directly in athletics
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:22 PM
5

I consider myself a feminist I believe in equality among all groups and individuals If you believe in universal equality then you are nothing like the feminists on reddit or tumblr.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:59 PM
2

If by the term "patriarchy" you mean "gender roles" then I'm happy to agree with you that gender roles exist, but refering to them as "patriarchy" implies that they only negatively affect women, which is obviously not true (quick counterexample: selective service) If by patriarchy you mean some sort of conspiracy or concious societal structure created with the purpose of oppresing women, then I cease to take you seriously. Such a thing is patently ridiculous when you realise that the majority of…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 10:08 PM
0

True, but in the western hemisphere, especially in Canada and the UK, the information we receive on rape has reached saturation point for men. The statistics show that the vast majority of rapes are now committed by a small minority of serial rapists with no empathy and no guilt, and all this "don't rape" bullshit won't get them to change their minds. In fact, it has been suggested that this sort of publication can actually help these rapists as it sets in the mind of women that most rapes are o…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:18 PM
1

Yes, but you gain the benefits of citizenship, and therefore taxation, passively. Stuff like representation, a police force, and a health service.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:23 PM
5

There is also a recuring pair of bumbling villian side-kicks I forget the names of You're thinking of snips and snails, i think.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:17 AM
2

I think what pisses me off the most about this is that she dismisses the entire MRA community as a bunch of assholes who can't get girlfriends, rather than us having some actual grievances. It's like "let them eat cake", but with an added layer of insult.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:10 AM
7

Think of it this way. The government is providing a service to you, ie: citizenship and all the benefits it entails. Taxes are the price you pay for this service. It is then the governments decision as to what they spend the money on, just as it is a company's decision what they spend their income on. Child support is money you pay to excuse you from caring from your children full time, so it makes sense if you pay it for your biological children, but paying it for children that aren't yours is …
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:01 AM
15

I think the fact that this needed to be said shows how intellectually bankrupt feminism has become "Oh, our usual MO of lies and distortions isn't working? We better try something else then."
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:22 AM
5

Can someone make a similar thing to this where if you answer yes to being a feminist, it debunks the points made here (the £10,000 is a median rather than a fair comparison etc)? I'm fed up of this stuff but I'm no good at infographics
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:21 PM
1

I still don't get how marxist is supposed to be an insult. All it is is just a different politcal philosophy. It had flaws, but so does capitalism.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:14 PM
2

I was just using that as a point to demonstrate that violence towards men is taken as a given in video games, but including violence towards women is practically social taboo.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:28 AM
10

I love the way they bring up hotline miami as an example of sexism in games. Hundreds of men (and they are all men) get murdered in really brutal and sadistic ways in that game. Is that misandry? If it is, no-one cares, but if you so much as hint that the rape of a woman might occur then you might as well be hitler for all the bad press you'll recieve.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:45 PM
2

The worst part is it's impossible to quit. Once you've had dihydrogen monoxide once you have to have it almost every day or you die.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:56 PM
3

I was all ready to get riled up at something that wouldn't affect me in thr slightest, then I opened the article and realised that this is the uni i'm going to in a weeks time. Now i'm pretty pissed off.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter