TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Windryder Archive

View 1 posts and 251 comments by Windryder on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

FeminismWindryder/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
123

That's exactly the kind of yes/no, on/off, black/white binary thinking that leads to headlines like this. Context matters. No you can't hold a 5 year old autistic child to the same standards as an adult, and if you can't see that, you shouldn't be giving your opinion to anyone about anything.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:08 PM
5

But don't worry guys, for you there's extreme mixed martial arts!
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:53 AM
3

That's the risk you take I guess, but you are likely your brother's best chance at an advocate people will actually listen to.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 08:50 PM
1

be there for them in a time a of actual struggle because- humans That's a good way to get yourself a good old false accusation.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:02 PM
3

I don't find that effective. Instead, point out what they just said. "Kill myself. (to onlookers) She just told me to kill myself! I said that discrimination against males exists and her answer was to kill myself!" "Would you like to have a discussion" will get walked all over. Point out the hypocrisy instead.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:01 PM
2

How did she erase men? Edit: I'm actually asking, not being a sarcastic dick. I'm looking for the story behind it.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:58 PM
6

Isn't she the one who avoided men for over a month and then raved about how amazing it was and she was "having a ball the whole time"?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:52 PM
1

You might be right, but the word misandry doesn't have the same meaning as sexism. Misandry specifically means prejudice against men. Accurate word choice matters, and as it stands people will at least know what it means. Generally though I agree, use of the word sexism where possible will be more effective.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:50 PM
2

Well, at least its a woman trying to stand up for men. She's the only one allowed to have a voice. I'm just going to say something that I know is true but is really swept under the rug. They act like "domestic violence" happens evenly across demographics and households, but it doesn't. It happens quite often in very particular communities and not at all in others. Any police officer can tell you that, but nobody wanting to "inform the public" is willing to be more specific about where the proble…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:36 PM
3

Those are all excellent points, especially the Nazi example. I know Germans get sick of Nazi's being used as an example all the time, but at this point it's not about brow-beating Germans, its about illustrating a point. Sorry Germans.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:29 PM
3

Are you female? Then you have a voice. I'd go to bat for your brother and not let down. Harass the teachers who witnessed it into telling the truth, and that the girl who assaulted your brother is lying. Get your brother off the hook and get her onto the hook. "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good to do nothing".
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:25 PM
4

Nah that's definitely not Canada. There is some bullshit here, but not those levels of bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:15 PM
29

To my mind, that makes it worse. If most of the interest in the fields of study is from males, then out of the people qualified for the job, males are going to be far more abundant. "Remember Mary Ogleden from the class of 78? Yeah, she has a Doctorate, we should get her!" "She's actually working in the field and says she has no interest in being a professor, plus she's super close to retirement" "Well, if she wants the position, its hers!" "We need professors to teach classes though, what do we…
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:11 PM
1

I'm aware of that, but all it takes is for one group with an agenda to take a screenshot of the subreddit for that to be twisted into more hatefuel. You don't need to explain it to me, it's an optics thing. Nobody who is anti-MRM is going to look upon anything said here with a generous or forgiving eye.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 11:18 PM
-1

I'm not liking all of the "confusion/confused/durp" comments I'm reading when the picture in the OP LITERALLY says "poor literacy" under boys. Do you not understand how ironic that is and how bad that looks? This was clearly a group project done by a group of girls with the express purpose of bashing on boys. You shouldn't be so "confused" just because one of the anti-male cards is slightly over the dividing line between male and female. For fuck sakes guys, look better than this. If a feminist …
/r/MensRights23/09/19 09:09 PM
-7

is the idea that women are more likely to have depression and anxiety, which simply isn't true. Based on what grounds? Propaganda? Have you met women? Or are you an alien sent from another planet and our ways are foreign to you? Men are more predisposed towards aggression, women are more predisposed towards neurological disorders. Such as depression, anxiety, spontaneous divorce, assault with a weapon, coercion, coercion with deadly intent, selfishness, appeal to authority fallacy, appeal to the…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:11 AM
3

there was a girl there, who was surprised at how honest and open we were being about it, she thought it was a bit odd Because she was led to believe by media that guys would just be talking about bending girls over and fucking them. The reality is that guys don't like to get into details about sex with other guys because no one wants to increase other guys interest in their girlfriends. It's also just that guys are actually people, but the "locker talk" thing is such a myth.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:22 PM
15

Well done, thanks for bringing this to our attention.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:32 PM
48

Thanks for bringing that up, report all of these too please. Is getting around a hashtag ban against their policy/TOS? Each user who did that should be reported too.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 04:13 PM
1

No problem, gotta be a little bit cautious lately. Lots of people have been making false posts.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 04:02 PM
2

Just had to double check that my username didn't say "FreePunchingBag". K, it doesnt. Get some sleep, you might not be so keen on your comments in the morning. I'm going to take my own advice, so have a good one.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 08:03 AM
2

Somewhat surprisingly this might be genuine. Legit post history, the tone of which matches up with this post. A little naieve, but so was everyone at some point. When taking into account their history this definitely bait-ish, but I'd at least give the time of day.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 08:01 AM
3

I didn't say any of those things. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:50 AM
3

I don't hate you because you're a woman. I don't even hate you. You just need to calm down.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:15 AM
4

Cool. What game are we playing here? Hmm, I don't think this is the "feel sorry for you" game, I think we've moved onto the "shame game". Sorry, not working. If you were a nerd or at all interesting, I'd say "condition immunity", but you'd probably just try to link that to some other stylized article. Your life is not my problem. My life is my own. You can't change that. Stop trying to.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:58 AM
17

This is messed up. This was typed from one person's account and their perspective. I'm not doubting this happened, but something other than someone's blog post is required before I'm willing to take any action. Come on, put in a little effort if you want people to get behind you.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:33 AM
12

You know what's not a surprise? The truth of this article.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:30 AM
3

I'm glad that I've struck a chord, but definitely take the time you took raging at me to find a good place within yourself. We're not your enemy, but our lives are our own. We've been told we're expendable for so long either explicitly or implicitly that we've started to believe it. It's the last bastion of the Samurai, and it's where the line has been drawn. Don't ever call suicide "selfish" again. The right to live or die is the last fundamental right any person has, and you cannot take that f…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:19 AM
4

The amount of false-flags from TwoX here over the past week is astounding. You aren't a Men's rights contributor. You're a saboteur. Yes, sometimes men kill themselves. Must suck to have your ATM/doormat suddenly stop working. We're not customer support. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:03 AM
2

Doesn't matter. This is a false flag from TwoX. They didn't have any real trauma. Look at the writing style and the number of posts on the account from when they posted. This is trying to establish a narrative.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:00 AM
1

Basically 0 posts on the account. False flag op from TwoX trying to discredit the community by typing a "story" the way TwoX does. "Blah blah happened. I am so distressed. Everyone please say how awful X is." This isn't a men's rights issue, it's bait. They're looking for posts so they can shut the forum down in the same way they shut down that (admittedly super toxic) Red Pill Forum. TRP was utter shit, but don't fall for this crap. They will brigade anything that doesn't fit their narrative be…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:58 AM
2

Try harder. Nobody is saying that, the idea that men are "animals who just want to fuck" is false and antiquated, your "insightful statement" is a load of 2-dimensional bullshit, and furthermore, fuck you.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:51 AM
0

Is this a real screenshot? Some people are really bad at false-flag ops. It's too bad so many people are so good at them and that so many people fall for them and that so much public opinion is based on a little up or down arrow.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:49 AM
1

Highly upvoted due to the title due to brigading. If it was renamed to "father gets custody after 10 years of legal hell", you'd see a VERY FUCKING DIFFERENT upvotes number. Yes, downvote me, then proceed to eat a big bowl of shit you psychos.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:45 AM
2

"Emails obtained by 1 NEWS showed one welfare advocate strongly objecting to the food survey being used for their client's food grant as they did not have anywhere to cook. "He has got no cooking facilities and is also lacking many other items of personal hygiene and care - items which are not considered in the Otago food survey," the welfare advocate said." While we're cherrypicking quotes, lets keep at it.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:43 AM
2

TwoX is crusading pretty hard. If they can't change the narrative, they will delete the forum.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:39 AM
1

Unfortunately, the world stage has become so perverted that only female spokespersons can have a snowball's chance in hell of putting us back on even ground to where we can even START to speak for ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:37 AM
6

No comments. Sorry dude, I think this is great. Stuff gets to the frontpage because of... reasons. Only some of which are the quality of the post. This should've received more attention instead of being relegated to obscurity. Sorry.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:35 AM
3

Apparently we have nothing to say about it either? It's a double standard, idk wtf makes this shit become popular. Bots maybe. Your point is as good as anyones.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:32 AM
2

Point ------------> You.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:30 AM
4

I'm pretty sure your response to them should be entirely as follows: ..|. -_- .|.. The end.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:29 AM
2

I SH'EE SH'IX ON THA WHOREISON! ITSH A SHLIM DAY AT SHEE MATEYSH!
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:27 AM
9

Aka "science has found no official support for the 'ALL MEN ARE PIGS!' tagline dating back to circa 1996." I "love" (/s) that science now has to justify that we're not a subhuman sub-species. I also "love" (slash fucking S obviously) that this article is guaranteed "controversial".
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:24 AM
1

Fat Mariah Carrie wants a slurpee. Okay. Ten bucks says the door is open because he's about 9 blocks south and continuing on.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:18 AM
7

Well, stop turning men and dads into two-dimensional ATM machines with zero rights and emotions then. Thanks for your interest in our forum but this is where feminism hits a big fat brick wall. When Men decide the whole system is so much against them that it makes more sense to kill themselves than keep playing the game, the game is all sorts of rigged. Stop trying to manipulate us and take TWO SECONDS for introspection. People would rather kill themselves than play your game. Stop rationalizing…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:12 AM
3

Oh good, platitudes will save me.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:09 AM
3

It's interesting how accepted this film was too. It was the late 90's so we hadn't gotten into hardcore hysteria. It was pre-every-bullshit-hashtag-'movement'. Yet it still saw the writing on the wall. Even then I was impressed and surprised this line made it through the wall of censors to make it to theatres and later home video. It likely got through just because he was a "broken man, and crazy, and he says crazy things".
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:06 AM
1

This is a lot better comment than the "hot take" you had previously. I agree that it's good to be vigilant against extremism on either side. Unfortunately, it's rampant on the feminist side, but it's good to watch for it on the... masculinist? Side. As it stands it would just help to balance things out, but there is a tipping point. So I agree with you there. As far as my comment being out of place, ..|. -_- .|.. I have just as much right to say my opinion as you do.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:01 AM
1

To be fair, you're not going to convince someone with a couple of sentences. Sometimes they will disagree with you anyways. More flies with honey and all that.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 04:56 AM
7

I certainly appreciate seeing it, and based on the voting a lot of other people do too. Your comment included.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:24 PM
0

Did some lady hurt your feelings on Twitter? Be better. This is not a helpful thing to say and is just inflammatory without cause. You're attacking the poster you're responding to instead of addressing their argument. YOU be better.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:16 PM
2

I know you're being sarcastic, but women aren't any more inherently "bad" than men are. That's something that drove me nuts about "The Red Pill". They constantly said the phrase "AWALT" which means "all women are like that". They are a bunch of damaged people. That being said, if you think this forum is about being anti-women, you haven't read what people say here enough. Yes you get some people who bitterly speak out, but this forum is about making sure men get a fair shake in a world which has…
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:12 PM
5

"Yes, but what's the source of your sources? What's THEIR source? What's that sources sources source?" looks at article dated 1903 You're asking for a lot of supplementary data on an article from over 100 years ago. At some point you've got to be far enough back that the existence of something can be taken as its own evidence.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:02 PM
0

"every sandwich you see here was made by abused women attempting to please their men" /jk
/r/MensRights07/09/19 10:33 PM
12

The comments on this post so far bother me. I think its been demonstrated many many times that just ignoring feminist discrimination and intolerance leads to more and more real world problems for men. I don't know how many more anti-male laws and programs it will take for men to realize that ignoring attitudes like this is what leads to those laws and programs going into effect. Your grandpas let it happen, your fathers let it happen, stop repeating their mistakes and expecting a different resul…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:48 PM
21

I wouldn't wade into their space, but please don't leave their bullshit un-countered when it's out in the real world. They are far from harmless.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:43 PM
52

The video in question is on the internet now, I hope it gets back to that fellow so he can use it to press charges.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:40 PM
0

Not sure why you're being so heavily downvoted, your point is that a man's chest is sexualized for women and then you provided evidence. I guess they have a problem with you talking about why he maybe didn't see it from his perspective, but it makes sense in context.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:39 PM
16

I would've grabbed her and put her in a choke hold and told her to calm the fuck down after the initial barrage of punches. It's not hitting her, but it is restraining her and it is defending yourself and keeping yourself from taking further damage. Instead, he just ate more punches and it could've been even worse, ie if she'd had a knife.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:26 PM
2

I agree 100%.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 10:12 PM
3

He could be a red piller. That narrative of "AWALT" drove me nuts. I stopped reading their forum because they are damaged people pushing a false narrative.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:39 PM
1

fart-raped? That's a term?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:36 PM
1

I thought AskMen is a feminist sub? Last I heard it's a place that was invaded by feminists because of its name, they wanted to control the narrative.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:36 PM
10

I was working for 10 years as an independent self employed general contractor. I got sick of all the paperwork and wanted to get back into working for someone else. When I tried to get back into the workforce as a white male, I found that jobs were straight up barred to me because they all wanted "people of color" or "women". They don't see that the truth of the world today is the opposite of what they think it is. So I'm back to being an independent self employed general contractor, because I d…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:21 PM
3

The funny part is that in 20 years when you're a known performer and people like you have helped change the world by saying things that need to be said so it's no longer a faux-pas, he will be the first one to say "oh yeah she was my drama student". He won't mention how he tried to stifle you and stomp it out of you. You're saying things that need to be said, and men might not outright tell you in person for fear of backlash, but secretly they will be grateful.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:16 PM
3

I was sort of thinking that too. He's giving her shit now, but in 30 years when the world is changed thanks to people like her he'll be like "oh yeah she was my student" and not mention how he tried to stomp it out of her at the time.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:13 PM
3

It never was. Feminism, not egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:10 PM
21

You say that but 2nd wave feminists have graduated straight on to 3rd wave feminists and are some of the most bitter negative people I know. I once worked at a pharmacy whose pharmacists were all females in that 50-60 year old age range, and being an assistant as a male was a nightmare every single day.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 04:07 PM
24

Modern feminism: For anything at which women have traditionally been worse, they are now equal. For anything at which they have been on-par, they are now superior. For anything that you have that they want, what's yours is theirs. For anything you might have in future that they might want, that is also theirs. Anyone complaining about any of the aforementioned premises is misogynist and hate-speech and your freedom and your future will be taken from you.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:34 PM
4

I think Redpillers would struggle to even tell you what they believe. I was reading that subreddit for something like 6 months before I unsubbed. Their "married red pill" subreddit I unsubbed after more like a month. That was definitely a case where the people who were trying to lead were blind, putting blindfolds on their followers, then telling them to follow them along a winding path that's one foot wide over a drop that means certain death. I have a pretty high tolerance for reading differen…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:49 AM
7

The circular logic in that article is astounding. They're using their own made up assumptions as facts to justify their other made up assumptions as facts then use the 2nd assumption which was justified by the 1st assumption to justify the 1st assumption with the 2nd assumption. Over and over and over again. The entire thing is fucking make-believe with fancier prose and arrogance fueled by a hate for men. Actually, that's not right, it's not "men", it's a made-up caricature that she's calling "…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:37 AM
10

When you're having fucking tea with Anna and "having a ball", you don't worry about trivial things like the actual work and maintenance and strife it took/takes to provide you with the technology and freedom to go on a misandrist spirit quest.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:23 AM
3

I don't think those are the only options. Somewhere short of taking his son out of school seems like the right course of action for starters.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 08:09 AM
2

What?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:54 AM
4

They probably were. I saw the same thing in pharmacy. It's the "I'm smart but something's bothering me, so it must be YOUR fault" fallacy.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 09:40 AM
2

Reddit is all about circlejerking. It's made for it due to its delineations. There's no avoiding it if you're on this site, the trick is finding your own particular ones which you think give you a piece of the truth.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 09:36 AM
5

It's not that they wonder, its that they want men not to have them. Much like a plantation owner who didn't want to emancipate his workers.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:23 PM
8

I get why you say that, but we're in the "rough future" mate. Men's Rights is starting to actually gain traction and get noticed. Look at what happened to Gillette over their man hating ad. Not only did they get a TON of backlash, they've had to switch over their entire marketing campaign to being pro-male as damage control. I'm not saying that there isn't still work to be done, because there is. A lot of work, particularly with regards to law, education (grants), and employment, but attitudes a…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:20 PM
10

That's true. This is going to be downvoted, but I feel sorry for future generations of women, and women who are like yourself today. Unless there is a serious outside force that distracts everyone (like what happened with WWII putting all of this on hold from the flapper era of the 20's and 30's), human social sentiment is a pendulum. Right now people are starting to realize just how maligned and disadvantaged men actually are in today's society. Especially if you happen to be white on top of th…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:11 PM
10

It's until after the Robot War of 2084, when they have more important shit to keep them occupied than stirring up drama. Even the 16 year olds would get their shit together at that point.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:00 PM
6

I think you're right, and the logical fallacies in that line of thinking of theirs are numerous.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:01 AM
1

I'll put the same effort into the response as Mastodon did into its comment: Mastodon can go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:42 AM
21

Thanks for your input.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:41 PM
95

Lets go demand more whites get cast in Bollywood /s
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:40 PM
2

I know this wasn't intended to be comedy, but it was so powerful, so harsh and so accurate that I laughed out loud.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 07:14 AM
3

A thread like this is how I got onto that subreddit in the first place. This is exactly how my mom would act in this situation.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 07:10 AM
3

"We couldn't make the Americans swallow this commercial, lets see if we can cram it down the throats of the Germans."
/r/MensRights08/05/19 07:07 AM
1

I don't know about sodium, but alcohol has the effect of the gut coming outwards. The fat that alcohol creates (as explained in the other fellow who responded to you's comment) is stored between the organs and the muscles. That's how people get a "beer belly" and can touch it and have it still feel hard. Visceral fat is the most toxic fat since it's directly on/against your organs but thankfully it also gets used up the fastest by your body.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:12 AM
13

She's way softer than he is in these photos. He has almost no subcutaneous fat, its almost all visceral so he probably has been drinking a lot.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:51 PM
9

hahhaah that's brilliant
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:19 PM
3

I'd rather not, I can understand the need for unhappy people on the margins to vent without needing to wade into the muck myself.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:28 AM
1

I appreciate that but in no way will I take you up on it. Thank you for the offer.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:26 AM
3

No, it's more insidious than that. In WWII that was another country that could be pointed to with "look at what they're doing, they must be stopped!". Instead, these betrayals come from our mothers and sisters (that's what it was in my case, my mom divorced my dad when I was 6 and I was used at their pet feminist verbal whipping boy the entire time I was growing up). Women with anti-male agendas have gone through law school with specifically that in mind and have gotten themselves into places of…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:40 PM
7

I've never looked into mgtow, I'm happily married. That being said, as I understand it, that's a place for men who are done with women. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with that. If guys have been hurt a lot and need a place to still feel of value, I have no problem with them seeking it out. I get that its probably a place where a whole lot of negative sentiments get aired, but it's probably important that they have a space to vent into.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:33 PM
10

Feminism by definition wants men to be a lower class. It's feminism not equalityism. I wouldn't even be here if what you're saying is true. I was always about quality of opportunity but I saw time and time again how women were being promoted and protected at the expense of men and that just trying to make things equal actually put men at a severe disadvantage, because of what feminism was doing.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:29 PM
15

I agree. It's not like feminists have been looking with an unbiased eye at comments made in this forum and then came to a consensus. They just want to shut down anything that gets in the way of their multiple agendas that come at men's expense. Citing comments like the one in the OP would be an excuse used by them, not an actual reason.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 07:24 PM
21

*32nd. 32nd of each month.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:55 AM
0

Yeah there are no good options for the upcoming federal election. I will always vote for whomever I think will win vs the exploit-ignorance-for-votes-to-get-in-office-and-then-make-policy-to-serve-bigbusiness party, but I don't like my options, which means the UCP will probably win federally once again.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 01:49 AM
31

Karen Straughan is a fantastic person and exactly what we need.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 07:20 PM
2

I had the same thing with my wife for the ultrasound for our first child. This was back in 2007, and was their "policy" that men weren't present. I wrote a letter and rightly told them it was discrimination, I was the father, and unless the child's mother is requesting privacy, an institution shouldn't be enforcing policy to separate or restrict access based on gender. I was told in response that their board had a meeting over my letter in order to discuss the policy. They (of course) decided no…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:11 AM
10

History is going to look back on examples like this with the same vitriol as the examples of racism from the past.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:40 AM
10

His teachers are not supporting him. They are trying to get him to perjure himself, and to support the false accusation. Your boyfriend's only proper defense is to only tell the truth when he speaks at all and to DENY ALL FALSE ALLEGATIONS. People will attempt many different tactics to try to get a "confession". Some will act like they are on his side, giving "helpful advice". As authority figures over him, that's doubly dangerous because they're abusing a position of trust. The only things your…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:32 AM
2

No worries, it happens. We don't know each other, I get it.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:22 PM
2

My bad, I interpreted your comment wrong. Normally I'd give someone shit for being as rude as you were in response, but I understand why.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:09 PM
-2

Interrupting a lawyer in court is a good way to get contempt of court and wind up in jail. Women can be "passionate", but when men do the same things, it's "anger", "bullying", and "violence". Your response only makes sense if you only read the first 2 sentences of my post. I don't know why I'm bothering to respond to someone who can't be bothered to read an additional 3 sentences before they need to mash the reply button and fire off a rebuke.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 11:41 AM
18

I'm not so sure about that. A famous man like him would be assumed to have money in each and every one of his previous divorce cases, of which there were four. I wouldn't be surprised if he's still paying the bullshit that is alimony to each and every one of them. If his money doesn't cover that, they will garnish his wages. I would bet he literally works to make money for his ex-wives, who are fucking other people by this point and who probably made him miserable before and during their divorce…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 11:35 AM
2

I was at the beach once and this girl just walked up to me and told me that my chest hair turned her off. "Tough balls, (while motioning with head) on your way" alternately, "Guess it sucks to find out the world isn't created for your amusement? I'm not your create-a-character in The Sims. You can't just turn my chest hair slider to 0." You could even say the 2nd phrase followed by the first.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:33 AM
14

Just a tiny aside, I know a lot of people are big on stoicism, but I hear of situations like this all too much. Speaking up and over their lawyer in turn just like they were over yours is far more effective than sitting there silently. People have a tendency when one person is "passionate" and the other one is silent to assume that the person saying all the stuff is telling the truth because the other person isn't contradicting them. Your best bet would've been to get down into the muck with the…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:17 AM
23

How long ago was this quote from? You're talking about her and this quote in a very past tense way, which makes me interested in how long the writing has been on the wall from a historical standpoint.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 08:05 AM
2

Same old shit. Change the genders in it and all hell breaks loose. Pussypass big time.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 12:17 AM
0

So, you'd want it to be up to both? I'd be on board with that, who would tiebreak if they disagree? I haven't confronted my parents yet, because even though I'm bitter about it, there is nothing they can do about it now. It was also heavily pushed in the culture at the time, and surrounded by misinformation. I am curious as to whose decision it was though...
/r/MensRights10/04/19 02:43 AM
1

Well reasoned and thought out response, you've completely changed my mind. /s obviously
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:40 AM
17

As much as feminism is the main problem in men's rights, it's not in this case. In the case of circumcision, the main problem are the weak willed amoral dads who aren't willing to threaten the stability of their relationships in order to keep their sons from being mutilated. People can argue the primary role of a father is to be any number of things, but the absolute number one role of a father above all others is to PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN. Any man who lets this be done to their child out of fea…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:35 AM
7

Please give some sort of warning when you're linking something like that. I know you think you're doing good by trying to shock people and throwing it in their faces, but you're preaching to the converted here. All seeing something like that does is make me unable to function or concentrate. I had to close it immediately. Edit: almost forgot to type that the link is of a circumcision of an infant. Opening shot is of the baby screaming his head off, doctor with a scalpel in hand and blood all ove…
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:11 AM
2

Those are good umm.. yard markers if you will. Good signs to look out for of a personality that would do such a thing.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:44 AM
2

That is a barefaced lie and exactly the kind of garbage myth that this subreddit is here to fight against. Someone else can pick it up from here if you want to educate this troglodyte, I have to block them for my own sanity.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:25 PM
3

I thought about taking the time to explain why your single minded focus on violence is misguided and what things are actually about, but you've clearly decided that there is one issue, and one issue only and men are fundamentally broken, so that would be a waste of my time. Don't expect anyone to take you seriously if you can't be bothered to try to take a fair assessment of what you're arguing about. That works fine if you're trying to shout people down, but not if you're actually trying to con…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 08:48 PM
2

and what are you doing to help by categorizing all men by the worst smallest percent of us like they're representative of the whole? Beginning a conversation with that assumption is a non-starter for me and shows we can't have a reasonable discussion because you're proceeding from a false premise that is also degrading and offensive. I have no love for criminals, especially the violent kind. The reason I'm in this subreddit is because I care about the responsible men who are suffering because of…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:54 PM
3

Stop thinking of men like we're dangerous animals with no impulse control please. Most of us want to keep our families and the people around us safe, not harm them.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:34 PM
3

I would've been cool with your post if not for the last 3 sentences. That's just inflammatory.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 05:47 AM
19

That would be great. They're so far up their own asses that they're parodies of themselves.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:28 PM
4

That's valuable to know, and might do more to convince certain puritanical people than my position. As far as I'm concerned, the unnecessary loss of erogenous tissue is more than reason enough to ban infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:03 AM
3

These days its because their fathers were circumcised. The original people who had it done to their boys was to keep them from masturbating. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reD7eb6GhQs
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:00 AM
7

but is the supposed outcome (in a religious ceremony like the one above) really so bad that we need to violate a multi-millennium old region’s essential tenets? yes. Also, is it really a multi-millenial practice? They would've lost LOTS of people to infection as infants.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:58 AM
6

At adult size, circumcision removes 12-16 inches of erogenous tissue. Just discarded like it's garbage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf8-hfAONfw
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:56 AM
1

For now, yeah. After years of things being arbitrarily female, and the current political climate of hollywood, it's an assumption.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 10:51 PM
9

Forgive us for assuming a movie that is mass-marketed with a female lead character that none of us have ever heard of is a "diversity" movie, in today's climate of diversity shitstorms.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:45 PM
8

Just so that the courts can decree half of what he earns after the divorce, plus the house he bought and paid for, now belong to her alone.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 03:00 AM
34

My wife has an IUD. When people find out about that in casual conversation, (women especially) love to jump right to telling me to get my balls cut off. They have no shame for it or any sense of "maybe I shouldn't be telling someone else to do this to their body". Recently one of them did a fucking dance while making snipping motions with her fingers in front of her body.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 03:20 PM
1

I mean, if you're not willing to take the time to read something someone else wrote, I don't think you've got the right to judge it. Even if you're agreeing with it. Reading is far faster than writing.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:12 AM
1

You made a fantastic and well-reasoned post there. Important to have that perspective in there. Unfortunately, a forum like that can attract a lot of women who are there because they want to sit as social judge, jury and executioner in the court of public opinion. I wouldn't have the stomach for dealing with those people these days. Good thing there is someone like you willing to post something like that in that kind of space.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:10 AM
1

Had a major surgery, got perscibed opiates. Filled the RX but threw out the rest after 3 days and just dealt with the pain. Hated being dopey and drowsy and unaware. Felt like I was wasting my life, even if it hurt.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:48 AM
5

I remember seeing them. It was there on youtube. When my wife watched the video today, it seemed different but memory isn't reliable so I didn't say it out loud. Now I know what it was.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:23 AM
35

I appreciate your willingness to put forward a differing opinion at risk to yourself. That being said, it is a gigantic stretch to assume the ad was telling men to overcome to message levelled against them in the media. This is clearly part of that message being levelled against them. Don't be fooled by the line "some men already are". That wasn't the main content of their message, it was a weak attempt at hedging their ad against backlash in case their pandering to popular male-bashing backfire…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:44 PM
12

"Toxic masculinity" is put in check before it even starts, or before there is any evidence to support it. Toxic masculinity is used as an excuse to marginalize men. It's prejudice and discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:39 PM
4

I used to think people who worked in universities as professors, and people who graduated from universities with doctorates could be trusted to have reasonable opinions. I used to see them as a source of reliable knowledge. Now I realize they're just as clueless as anyone else, except now they're dangerous because their socially destructive ideas have been given the stamp of ultimate legitimacy.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:01 PM
8

Benevolence doesn't even enter into it.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:47 PM
13

It's a loophole, not true equality.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:36 AM
5

One possibility is that as a lawyer, he knew these accusations were going to lead to some legal action that would hurt his family, take his money, ruin his reputation, and cause him to be estranged from his wife and daughters. He may have been ending himself at that point before his family lost any of the money he'd worked so hard to earn and before his relationship with his family was ruined.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:35 AM
1

The hypocrisy of discriminating against this boy child in order to compensate for some phantom future discrimination this boy is going to do (which isn't a real thing but taken as a given by this harpy) is completely lost on her.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:02 PM
2

How about we just assume everything YOU say has malicious intent and read it with as sarcastic of a tone as possible because we're looking for an excuse to get pissed at YOU?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:06 AM
7

What a fucking minefield. This is why I'm mostly silent in public.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:05 AM
4

Calling an elder by their given name is actual disrespect. This "teacher" was going to get mad at him no matter what he said, or even if he said nothing at all. She's a complete tyrant.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:03 AM
3

No. Drop them down a well and save the money for more deserving people.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:01 AM
2

Wow, as sad as it is to say, that is exactly the correct approach. Smart man.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:49 AM
1

We do that by having more young men with the right ideals going into law. That's how we got to this point in the first place. Feminists became lawyers to "change the system" and boy did they ever change the shit out of it in the ways that suited them, while retaining outdated laws like alimony because those suited them too.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:47 AM
1

You'll likely be within the top 10 during that span of time at least.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:45 AM
11

Smearing muffin mix on yourself is not a good enough justification.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:58 PM
2

I re-read it 3 or 4 times to check to see if he was being sarcastic or if he just whiffed hard on his comprehension.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:02 AM
2

Thank you. I'm not in the least bit surprised.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:35 PM
10

Wait, what? That's how corrupt our courts have become?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:02 PM
3

Please explain, Jessica Jones season 1 sucked so there's no way I'm even watching part of an episode for context.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:59 PM
2

I was raised as a feminist by a feminist. It broke me in my later childhood years and teen years. My mother would take out all of her anti-male rhetoric on me. Had to undo a lot of brainwashing in my early 20's to have a normal life.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:26 PM
1

Can you fill me in on the lawsuit?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:23 PM
3

huh. Good to know.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:46 AM
22

Thats incredibly narrow-minded. There are lots of reasons to oppose a witch hunt, in particular the reason of not wanting to see innocent people punished for "crimes" they didn't commit.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:42 PM
6

What a disgusting pig of a person she is.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:54 AM
2

Another lesson from this; there is no such thing as a male as a "safe" status to reach where you won't be raked over the coals for non-feminist behavior. Clinton got impeached.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 09:20 PM
2

I do not like that the one bolded line in the article is quoting her defendant saying it "plays into well-worn sterotypes". Even when she's found guilty, the article is pushing the agenda that this could be a slippery slope.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:57 PM
20

I agree 100 %. Realistically he will never become the person he could've become if he'd had caring parents. I don't see any way that permanent damage wasn't caused. I don't mean in a "traumatic experience" kind of way, I mean as in he will never be able to think properly. His life was literally ruined by these two people, they did worse than kill him. In my opinion the punishment should be at least equal to the effect on the victim. 20 years in a cell seems minimal for what they did.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:21 PM
6

I was definitely surprised. I'd learned about this before, it sickens me what they did. They are the worst kind of twisted people. It's hard for me to even comment here I am so sickened by what they did.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:17 PM
38

They already have tons of power and already do force changes unfortunately. The ones who got into law are worse than the ones who got into politics. They don't need to get elected in law and they got into it as part of their crusade.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:59 PM
1

Part of what makes it difficult is that feminists have learned they don't have to be respectful. They just link things to each other and shout people down en masse. It makes it difficult to keep your composure.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:32 PM
1

Believe it, it happened to me. I posted there once only, a post that got 50 karma, and I was banned 6 months afterwards, just for reading subs like this.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:37 AM
1

I ran into the same thing, I was banned from there despite only ever having posted there once, 6 months before my ban, with a comment that was decently upvoted.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:35 AM
2

k that was really funny.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 10:06 PM
11

It's pretty obvious when you see how she backpedals the moment her comment isn't accepted.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 02:01 PM
10

She wasn't clarifying her original comment, she was trying to not look bad. She was just saying she was trying to clear things up.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:39 PM
8

She only goes with the "it depends on the circumstances" once she gets called out and she realizes she suddenly might not be the belle of the ball.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:24 PM
2

I once tried to explain this exact thing, about a year ago, to those idiots in married red pill. Tried it a few times, they didn't get it, also the guys endorsed etc on that forum were getting into divorces. I left shortly after. Regular TRP is much better.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/17 01:34 PM
1

Depends on how damaging to your life her cheating would be. If you're still early on enough that filtering her would be a good thing, but all means, throw her to the wind and see what happens. You're much better off if you find that out about her early. If you're heavily invested however (kids especially), it's not a good idea to play with fire.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/17 01:31 PM
7

heh. You've got a point, but the fact is that the law and women's attitudes DO fuck men over.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 01:27 PM
18

There is clearly no such thing as karma. Evidence; way too many shitty people in the world doing shitty selfish things hurting other people and getting away with it all the time, and often being praised for it. The only consequences for people are those devised by other people. Edit: bunch of ouija board enthusiasts posting after me here. Make sure to "knock on wood" or you'll "curse the team" ding dongs. Belief in things like karma, or crediting success or failure to luck is mental weakness.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 01:24 PM
15

Let's not forget that one of "his" kids was "adopted". She definitely had CC experience.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/17 01:21 PM
2

This makes me irately mad like nothing else in the world. Also, a deep incredible sadness, but mostly mad.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:38 AM
2

I'd have to think trp too.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:39 PM
1

I got banned from there too. I only ever posted there once, and that was a year before my ban came from out of nowhere. It wasn't even a "mean" post, it was supportive. As a result I've got something like 50 karma on that subreddit.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:37 PM
2

That was very interesting. I was expecting the typical pseudo journalism where it's a page covered in advertising where you have to "click" to the next page to see the next "fact". I wasn't expecting a well-written article on how an airforce scientist debunked the theory of designing around an average.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 03:43 PM
2

We could just as easily be lobbying for legislation against a stereotype. Something something women and their bags, bags always taking up extra space, womanspreading.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 03:24 PM
1

I'd worry about getting an ear infection or something along those lines.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 03:16 PM
1

The page is only so long...
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:30 PM
1

This is true. I hope.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:10 PM
1

I mean is it any surprise that's happening because a girl was being charged by them?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:04 PM
2

What is Canada’s age of consent? The age of consent for sexual activity is 16 years. It was raised from 14 years on May 1, 2008 by the Tackling Violent Crime Act. However, the age of consent is 18 years where the sexual activity "exploits" the young person when it involves prostitution, pornography or occurs in a relationship of authority, trust or dependency (e.g., with a teacher, coach or babysitter). Sexual activity can also be considered exploitative based on the nature and circumstances of …
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:33 PM
1

Take the H out of there. There's nothing wrong with that opinion. You don't have to hedge.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:30 PM
10

This is dead on. I'm glad someone thought through it and commented here. The people commenting on the article certainly didn't.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:27 PM
2

Saved. Short and to the point and a great lesson. I've gotta feel for your grandpa. No real happiness for him in his life, but we can learn from what were unfortunately his mistakes.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/17 05:56 AM
3

Good link. Everyone should read it.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:05 PM
7

If you want to have a kid, you want to make damn sure that any kind you raise and support is your own.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/17 04:38 PM
1

The one that stood out to me was "philosopher" at 105.9
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 07:51 PM
6

This is a fantastic compilation of sources and straightforward TRP knowledge. Well done.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 05:41 PM
5

Except it's not a new low. It's on par.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 04:56 PM
3

What the hell ever happened to people trying to keep their baggage to themselves instead of making it everyone else's problem? "You are male, my rapist was male, therefore you are exactly the same" what in the actual fuck.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 04:18 PM
5

Women don't need a specific target in mind in order to compete with each other. They just imagine their ideal man, envision him as being "somewhere" in the world, and then compete with each other to be fucked by him. This is why you never show a crack in your demeanor. If you happen to get a woman who has convinced herself that you are Chad, you don't want to dispell her illusion. Yes it's superficial and yes she's living strictly in a fantasy world, but if you're good with fucking her despite t…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/17 04:34 PM
8

It's also illegal to "do" a lot of the things you never did but are accused of and have no evidence to dispute it.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 08:10 AM
37

They're trying to cash in on sunk cost fallacy.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/17 11:50 PM
-5

Feminists were mostly later generations. The original ones had fairly reasonable arguments. It was only later that they became the irrational screaming chimera they are today that got worse the further forward in time you go.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:04 PM
2

Agreed, in my experience that is a load of horseshit and the opposite is true.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 05:32 PM
3

If she's truly reckless to the point of being suicidal, that's mental institution territory. What I think is more likely is that she's highly manipulative and also likes the rush of danger. I think you'd be surprised at how much she'd make safe choices if she knew she didn't have an audience. You don't watch her 24/7 and if she was truly as much of a danger to herself as you allow yourself to fear, she'd already be dead. Most people like that "turn a corner" in their lives when others stop payin…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 04:26 AM
1

Because creatures with the limbs of a man and the body of a dog are truly horrifying - Guy Fieri -
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 04:20 AM
2

I was about to say something along these lines. Wife was in a car crash the other day. Her first one. After making sure she'd done the requisite phone calls and follow up, she came to see me for a hug. I gave her a hug, scooped her up, put her on the bed and pulled down her pants and gave her the pronebone. She asked me to stroke her hair as I was boning her and afterwards said she felt much better.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 04:13 AM
3

I've got 2 daughters. I tell them "no". I usually include a reason. If they continue to whine, I get angry. They are both well respected by their friends and teachers. The people around them appreciate that they give real reasons for what they want instead of defaulting to manipulation. Edit: I should add that I don't move the goalposts. I'm permissive about most things because they don't matter. My no's on the other hand they've learned are a hard no, unless they can give a good logical reason.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 04:07 AM
2

It really doesn't, you might be surprised. You cut off contact with the sister. The mom or whomever calls you to give you shit. You state your reason(s) (fewer more salient points are better than many weak ones). They either accept it or you stop talking to them as well. Keep people in your life on terms that work for you.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 04:03 AM
2

Call her on her shit. Don't give her attention when she's acting poorly. Reward good behavior with good treatment. Withdraw all attention when she makes a ploy and "needs help". Say what you think of her behavior/actions then go no contact for a while. She's manipulating you through your drive to look after her.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 04:00 AM
2

Eh, I've got the rest of reddit for memes. I prefer TRP to be meme-free.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/17 05:59 AM
8

You just got me to look up what "woke" is slang for. I regret it. What a load of drivel.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 07:54 AM
8

I doubt that's actually the case, it's just the idea we've been given by having a bunch of "respectable"-looking white people say such things in the media. That's about trying to get white people not to resist/fight, the idea of "you're doing it to yourselves".
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 07:48 AM
4

True, but definitely take advantage of it.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 07:45 AM
2

I'm glad you wrote this follow-up. As per our short conversation in your previous thread, I'd thought you were trying to meaninglessly stir up shit for status. When you explained that it was about getting young men on the right path to being better adults, I was on board with what you're trying to do. I still think though that MGTOW and MRA have their place. Some people will never be alphas, they are too naturally ugly or flawed. Or maybe they're the type that finds playing sexual strategy games…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 08:49 PM
1

That makes sense actually. I thought you were trying to drive a wedge as some kind of fake-internet-status thing.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 08:25 PM
2

When I first clicked on this, I thought it was going to be about people who were masquerading as red pill coming in here to sew misinformation. Instead, I see a post about people that have branded themselves as MGTOW or MRA. That's not the same thing as being a fake-TRP. They are competing philosophies [improve yourself (TRP) vs social engineering (MRA) vs be content being alone (MGTOW)] trying to accomplish the same kind of overall purpose; make men's lives better. They all have their uses. If …
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 05:33 AM
7

This was a quality post. Useful content. Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 06:51 AM
2

One of his first mistakes was speaking that way. If you're going to speak to a crowd of feminists, don't write in a way that makes it clear that you care about their approval. Feminists hunt that like more useful things hunt prey. I'm sure they immediately went condescending mom on him. I'm not going to bother checking the link to find out. Second, the fatty got that way through surgery, not self control. I can only imagine what kind of bad eating and lifestyle habits she'd be bringing into his …
/r/TheRedPill04/11/16 11:12 PM
7

All I saw was a skit where someone was approaching a situation logically where he was tired of the same old games.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 09:09 PM
15

You know, he had a real point when he said that if she was hurt, it would've been the first thing out of her mouth.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 05:29 PM
1

I still think you're being persnickety and this is beside the point, but I also don't care enough to argue. Fine. Not "horrendously ugly", I just wasn't personally attracted to them.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 04:45 AM
1

I didn't use those numbers. I probably went over the top by saying "horrendously ugly", but the point stands. He thought his girlfriend was hot. He never thought otherwise until other people pointed out to him that she wasn't hot according to them. What I'm saying is also backed by science. If what I was saying wasn't true you'd have everyone of a particular group after 1 member of the opposite gender. If attraction worked that way and only that way, the human race would've died out long ago. If…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/16 05:43 AM
13

I knew a guy who was reasonably attractive. Not a huge catch, but decent enough. I'd peg him roughly a 5 or a 6 on the scale. He was with a woman who was a 2 or less, depending on if you qualify the ones who are retarded or deformed as a 1 or a 0. She was one step above that. Fat, needy, lazy, boring, hairy, stupid. Nobody who knew him got why he was with her. I recall even asking one of his much closer friends "why is he with her? I don't understand, is something wrong with him? There's a way m…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/16 06:34 PM
11

Types are real. There are some women that people think are super hot that I think are horrendously ugly. Conversely I've been attracted to women that others have found ugly. What you're describing is more of a types thing. That's different than you dating someone that was ugly that you also weren't attracted to. Some guys will date an ugly girl consciously because they're worried about getting cheated on if she was hotter or she has some other attribute they really like.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/16 06:30 PM
3

I think it stands for message board.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 04:29 PM
3

Yeah I've heard him recently giving his woman's advice on his podcast. I stopped listening to the podcast. I can hear that kind of advice anywhere. It's a shame, he was so good to listen to before.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 04:46 AM
1

What the fuck is that thing you linked? It reminds me of an owl with its mouth open.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 04:44 AM
1

Her: "You ALWAYS want sex!" Me: "Yep, there aren't a lot of times where I'd turn it down, that's for sure." Then I'd grin and say something like "so, sex?"
/r/TheRedPill09/10/16 06:11 PM
1

Holy shit. Fantastic point.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/16 04:46 AM
1

for the freedom of beta-cuck's-self -hating males and their feminist handlers. I am 100% sure he is not advocating to fight for those groups of people. He wants to fight against them.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 04:24 PM
2

That tactic still assumes there's a redeemable person on the other end though. I agree with the other guy; fuck em. They're useless with useless ideas. Don't have any level of acceptance for them unless they change to a more productive way of thinking.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 04:22 PM
1

This is the kind of talk I'm looking for. I'm sick of hearing people say "just focus on yourself while the world burns".
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 04:20 PM
4

I get a bit of sadistic pleasure in this being the logical response to feminism.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 11:18 PM
5

Right, but you know that most courts are starting to not even make marriage a requirement for you being on the hook, right?
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 09:23 PM
2

Meanwhile all of the "historical" media we are exposed to shows loyal, attractive women married to men who do not care for them or treat them well. Last of the Mohicans had a whiny beta who she was "betrothed" to but she only wanted the rugged backwoodsman. Masters of Sex has his wife who he does not want to have sex with who is as loyal as can be and he cheats on her. People watch these shows and take them as fact because they're shown in a historical context. They forget that they're a dramati…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 09:12 PM
5

Are you implying that he owns a girlfriend or wife? /s
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 08:59 PM
1

That's not particularly useful. If I just wanted to say fuck it, I'd live alone with a lifetime supply of cheetos and lube. People are definitely trying to win, if they weren't they wouldn't spend time reading here and going to the gym and learning the common traps to avoid in society.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 08:57 PM
1

That's not particularly useful. If I just wanted to say fuck it, I'd live alone with a lifetime supply of cheetos and lube. People are definitely trying to win, if they weren't they wouldn't spend time reading here and going to the gym and learning the common traps to avoid in society.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 08:57 PM
7

The courts would still manage to consider her lack of money your responsibility. At least if a girl is already making decent coin it's a lot harder for the courts to justify alimony.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 08:50 PM
1

but then what is she going to bait you with to get her way? So much relationship manipulation is done based on the implication of being rewarded with pussy.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 08:47 PM
1

Don't worry, the previous generation will die eventually. Just raise your kids (if you have any) the right way. The only thing that worries me with TRP is we have a bunch of guys thinking the right way, (which is that marriage is toxic), likely not reproducing, or if they do, they don't raise the kids. So the kids raised by betas inherit the earth and the cycle of male slavery continues.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 03:08 PM
5

If everyone had this attitude, the law forcing men to pay for children that aren't theirs would be gone because it wouldn't work. All that's necessary for things which are wrong to be changed is for a large enough proportion of people affected by them to refuse to adhere to the laws.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 03:04 PM
1

Angelina is notoriously hard to please. She'd already been married twice before she married The Pitt. He likely is a bad father because he doesn't give a shit about her gaggle of adopted kids, and why should he. I'd put my own kids first and he likely does the same. As for smoking weed and drinking and getting angry, it probably mostly stems from her constant never ending drama. Then she was probably a freak in bed, so he'd put up with it for a little longer. Seriously though, she's fucking craz…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 03:56 PM
88

I hate that shit like this is allowed. I want a society that is about personal responsibility. Leeches like this should be out on their ass. Don't even jail them, force them to live in an area that only has other people like themselves. Don't waste any money on them. Let them starve or eat each other or whatever the hell they'll do. Trade sex for food scraps. Put the human trash all into one big heap. Save the state's money for those who are contributing to it. Free health care, better roads, sa…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 03:50 PM
2

I always thought it was "aiieee yaaaa"
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 03:24 PM
40

This guy was downvoted but it's true. More important than what your gym looks like is what you do there. To expand: if the gym closest to your house isn't ideal but you can fit that into your schedule 4x per week instead of 2x, that's the logical choice regardless of the decor. I don't talk to anyone when I'm working out anyways, I'm focused on what I'm doing.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 03:23 PM
0

Most women do have opinions on significant matters, but rarely are they backed by logical reasons. Because 99% of the time, its not their opinion. Its a parroted version of someone else's.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 03:15 AM
1

The Natives are the best treated conquered race in history. The European invaders decided to give not-genociding a whirl and have been providing for a race of dependents ever since.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 03:12 AM
1

Sure, it might improve them eventually. I agree with everything else you said, but not this. Rewarding bad behavior just nets you more bad behavior.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 03:10 AM
2

To be fair, throwing out vapid, unoriginal ideas that are regurgitated from media sources isn't just limited to women. Women are the major culprits of it though. Guys are just more likely to talk about how X person in Y country is some horrible whatever and needs to be stopped. It's still mindless parroting. It's just that women will yak on for hours about some "cause" or other because to them it makes them look good, and so much of their existence is spent trying to make themselves look good.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 06:06 PM
27

This is the only good rebuttal I've seen in this whole thread, and it's kind of buried. Edit: well it's not buried anymore.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 06:02 PM
3

Then I bet they complain about how you "never talk". I'd be like "you don't want me to talk, really".
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 06:01 PM
3

It's like an explosion. It's all about the path of least resistance.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 06:01 PM
16

The longer I live the more I pity women. Yes. Pity your incompetent, vapid overlords. They've got it so rough, having everything handed to them on a platter with a free out for any mistakes they make.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 05:56 PM
1

I don't support this old-school glorification. After all, they're the ones who let the feminist movement run rampant and made the conscious decision to shove their heads up their own asses while it was happening.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 05:50 PM
1

I wanted to comment on that thread yesterday when I saw it, but it was being "heavily moderated". Fuck other subreddits on this site, seriously. As for the actual situation itself, she clearly got married so he'd have to be saddled with her debts. That's as mercenary as it comes.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 05:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter