TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wisemanner Archive

View 100 posts and 3,044 comments by Wisemanner on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
192

GeneralWisemanner/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:41 AM
181

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:28 PM
180

Wisemanner/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:47 PM
138

Anti-MRMWisemanner/r/MensRights07/10/20 08:55 AM
133

False AccusationWisemanner/r/MensRights17/12/17 03:24 PM
114

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:04 AM
96

Edu./Occu.Wisemanner/r/MensRights02/04/17 02:19 PM
82

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:54 PM
58

False AccusationWisemanner/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:42 PM
56

Marriage/DivorceWisemanner/r/MensRights12/05/17 10:44 AM
42

GeneralWisemanner/r/MensRights11/11/17 07:27 AM
41

ProgressWisemanner/r/MensRights11/11/19 07:58 AM
40

Legal RightsWisemanner/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:46 PM
35

Activism/SupportWisemanner/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:32 PM
32

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:51 PM
26

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:04 PM
25

Wisemanner/r/MensRights06/09/16 11:35 AM
24

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights19/03/17 11:34 AM
24

Activism/SupportWisemanner/r/MensRights25/02/18 07:31 AM
24

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:32 PM
22

False AccusationWisemanner/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:08 AM
22

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:07 PM
21

Wisemanner/r/MensRights20/12/16 08:10 AM
21

Wisemanner/r/MensRights26/03/17 06:42 PM
21

ProgressWisemanner/r/MensRights01/01/18 02:08 PM
20

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:58 PM
20

Wisemanner/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:18 AM
20

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:43 AM
19

Wisemanner/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:24 PM
18

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:28 AM
17

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights23/01/19 09:28 AM
17

Wisemanner/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:14 PM
17

Marriage/DivorceWisemanner/r/MensRights29/05/17 05:45 PM
16

ProgressWisemanner/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:04 AM
15

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:16 PM
15

Wisemanner/r/MensRights03/02/17 09:43 AM
15

Edu./Occu.Wisemanner/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:09 PM
15

Wisemanner/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:17 AM
15

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:39 PM
14

Wisemanner/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:25 PM
14

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:25 AM
14

Legal RightsWisemanner/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:16 PM
14

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:13 PM
13

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:33 PM
12

Wisemanner/r/MensRights30/12/16 09:28 AM
12

Wisemanner/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:10 PM
10

Legal RightsWisemanner/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:34 PM
10

HumourWisemanner/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:48 PM
10

ProgressWisemanner/r/MensRights17/04/20 08:50 AM
10

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:51 PM
9

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:47 PM
9

Wisemanner/r/MensRights10/11/16 10:37 AM
9

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:55 PM
8

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:59 AM
8

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights25/02/18 05:03 PM
8

False AccusationWisemanner/r/MensRights26/09/20 11:27 AM
8

Activism/SupportWisemanner/r/MensRights26/10/17 09:13 AM
7

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:29 PM
7

Marriage/ChildrenWisemanner/r/MensRights17/11/17 09:23 PM
7

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:40 PM
6

Activism/SupportWisemanner/r/MensRights11/04/17 05:44 AM
6

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights04/03/20 07:25 AM
6

ProgressWisemanner/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:19 AM
6

Marriage/ChildrenWisemanner/r/MensRights16/06/18 08:36 PM
6

False AccusationWisemanner/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:02 PM
6

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:34 AM
6

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights03/11/17 06:19 PM
5

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights03/11/17 06:59 AM
5

Legal RightsWisemanner/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:20 PM
5

Marriage/DivorceWisemanner/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:09 AM
5

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:59 PM
5

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:07 PM
4

GeneralWisemanner/r/MensRights11/02/17 02:49 PM
4

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights07/07/20 06:49 PM
4

Wisemanner/r/MensRights13/09/16 12:38 PM
4

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:58 AM
4

Wisemanner/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:33 PM
3

Wisemanner/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:06 PM
3

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights18/10/17 08:28 PM
3

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:00 AM
3

Wisemanner/r/MensRights10/02/17 08:42 PM
2

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:15 PM
2

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:06 PM
2

Wisemanner/r/MensRights07/01/17 09:03 AM
2

DiscriminationWisemanner/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:31 PM
2

Wisemanner/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:31 AM
2

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:42 PM
2

Wisemanner/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:12 PM
1

Wisemanner/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:45 PM
1

Activism/SupportWisemanner/r/MensRights19/10/17 02:43 PM
1

Wisemanner/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:34 PM
1

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:48 AM
1

QuestionsWisemanner/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:59 PM
1

Wisemanner/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:52 PM
1

GeneralWisemanner/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:39 PM
1

Edu./Occu.Wisemanner/r/MensRights07/11/17 02:43 PM
1

Social IssuesWisemanner/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:26 PM
1

FeminismWisemanner/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:16 AM
1

Legal RightsWisemanner/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:19 AM
0

Wisemanner/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:15 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,044 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

They ghosted Paul Gammbacchini when he was falsely accused of sex crimes even though he had supported them for years. Never have anything to do with the degenerates.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 10:40 AM
5

signed.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 08:33 AM
3

I'll make just three points. The writer describes cases which she says actually occurred, without providing evidence, a well-known feminist writer tactic. She says women experience abuse on-line, without mentioning men do too (many cases have been mentioned in these pages). In fact, in the UK, male MPs have experienced more on-line abuse than female ones. It is Bates who is telling lies when she says false accusations are rare. (The figure she mentioned in her book is for PROSECUTIONS of false a…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 08:16 AM
10

Get another school.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:28 AM
11

They do it, because they know they can get away with it. There is not a single male politician of any influence ready to stand up to them. Next time, they will be paying twice as much. Australian men are to blame.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 07:22 AM
6

I would make two observations. 1. Nothing you read here is as bad as what you read in feminist subs - yet that is allowed. 2. If you go around saying "please" to feminists, you will get one answer: "No!"
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:39 AM
10

It's the only way they can win an argument. Lies, distortions, selected details.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:07 PM
1

The law should explicitly state how much money or time you have to invest before you can be taken to court for support payments... Exactly. If it left to the judge, we know men will pay high and women will pay low.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 09:17 AM
6

VAWA? Isn't that Biden again? It's appalling that things are so loaded against an honest citizen but his own country. Please keep us informed.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:46 AM
3

A bit of good writing. And, surprise, surprise, it is a woman who is trying to do something about it - while male politicians do nothing.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 06:02 AM
4

And they didn't think this would happen? Male surrender monkeys asked for this.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:07 PM
5

Be careful. Some commenters are saying it's making fun of men.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 10:59 AM
2

Then it should be no more Warners.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 10:24 AM
29

Appalling. I would move away as soon as you are able.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:47 PM
1

"I looked up the stats..." There you go again. As I have said, the stats have been manipulated. Koss - if I've got the right feminist - did it. She got a high figure for female students having been raped by fiddling the figures. She included every female student who had had sex while being drunk. Then she fiddled the figures for sexual assault - by including any female student who had been looked at - or imagined she had been looked at - by a male in a way she did not like. Bates did it in her r…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 06:16 PM
2

....err, and robbery. You do wonder at the gutlessness, indeed amorality, of Canadian male politicians who allowed this level of extorsion of males - for they will have known that would be the almost entirety of the case against Canadian male citizens.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 09:58 AM
1

I thought the call was: "Kill all men!" Ah, yes. I see it's feminist logic. What it means is men hate women. Feminists were never good at logic, were they? "False rape claims are rare." No, they are not. They are only "rare" because the figures are fiddled. The UK police only count as false cases where the woman admits she lied. All the others where it is proven the woman lied are shunted into a group called "No crime situations". In a recent TV program, three especially egregious and proven cas…
/r/MensRights06/11/20 10:47 AM
1

It's a long document, but I read a fair bit of it, and, yes, feminists are against shared parenting, as they are in the UK because in most cases the mother gets more custody. But I can't see shared parenting being blocked by this document, it just not being taken as the norm, and the document does take into account the child's own wishes, which may give preference to its dad. I don't see anything, except the usual reasons, for denying a father visitation. Can you point out the actual words that …
/r/MensRights06/11/20 07:09 AM
1

You may inherit your wealthy wife's fortune if she dies first (unlikely).
/r/MensRights06/11/20 06:44 AM
2

Exactly. Too late for me, but for young guys today, sex dolls and surrogacy, and, err, freedom and wealth are the way to go.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 06:43 AM
2

Having read all the comments here, I'm now of the belief that this is very bad for Dutch males. Sure, in very rare circumstances the odd male might be helped, but in return for that many innocent males are going to be victimised.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 06:32 AM
1

Then famous cases of female on male abuse could be brought forward.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 06:24 AM
10

It doesn't matter how common it is. That would be like saying male breast cancers are rare and so they shouldn't be treated.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 05:25 AM
1

I believe I have and got the occasional word. But that is not the same as speaking or understanding.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 07:18 PM
15

The question they should have been asked was: "Don't you want to help males?" Their answer should then have been broadcast.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 07:06 PM
3

I don't think many non-Dutch people read or speak Dutch. Is it as difficult as it's sometimes thought to be for non-Dutch natives?
/r/MensRights05/11/20 07:01 PM
17

Just about sums up my view too!
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:40 PM
3

Will it apply to females who force sex on males?
/r/MensRights05/11/20 04:29 PM
2

If you repeatedly hit somebody over the head with a two by four, he'll have to be an idiot not to get the message.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:58 AM
1

Ten years ago.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 10:17 AM
1

No need to ask a sex dolls - until feminists convince politicians to make men get written permission from their local feminist commissar to have sex with their own sex doll, I suppose. Which, I suppose, is only a matter of time.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 07:05 AM
2

A senior official should not be making mistakes like this. It is gross incompetence. She should be fired.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 05:46 AM
1

Men.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 06:07 AM
21

And the authorities give in to feminists - again!
/r/MensRights03/11/20 06:05 AM
20

Yes. But I think the idea is to keep putting it forward. It takes seconds to sign, so I'm happy to help.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 07:44 PM
8

India? The feminists will scream and lawmakers will give in. It's happened before.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 06:12 PM
7

I wouldn't worry too much. They will get very light sentences at most.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 04:41 PM
1

Sensible Hungarians.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 04:03 PM
1

Counselling, legal aid, social security & everything else that I would have wanted were denied by subtle rules that ended up being tilted against men.... Why don't you pass on your research to Bettina Arndt? She might be able to make something of it. In fact, it sound right up her street.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 03:30 PM
2

And male Australian voters still vote for the people who did this, I suppose.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 10:33 AM
6

female income sources aren't counted as taxable income... Incredible!
/r/MensRights02/11/20 09:32 AM
1

That's generous of her. The wife usually gets 100%.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 12:43 PM
4

Please support her, everyone, because every woman who adopts her idea is a male saved.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 10:24 AM
4

I don't have one, but I would explain to her that men and boys have rights as well, and that she should never falsely accuse.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:45 PM
10

Canada is the worst offender, I think. Although, the others are not far behind. Good luck
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:39 PM
7

About Australia? A male, by law, has no control over his female partner's money, but if he refuses to allow her access to his, he is guilty of domestic abuse. Only a government of male submissives would allow laws like that.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:22 AM
12

Maybe. But don't forget that many have no alternative, and that, whatever its drawbacks, it's far less risky and dangerous than sex with women today.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:05 AM
13

That is literally the law in Australia.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 04:38 PM
36

Yes, women do coercively control men; indeed, they are famous for it. One male reported recently, that when he and his friends decided to go to an all-male gathering, all of the married men had to get their wives' permission before agreeing to go. That is coercive control. The reason few women have been charged with it, is because of prejudice in the legal system, not that judges would be able to do much anyway, for women's prisons are being closed down. This is why feminists were so keen on the…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:35 PM
2

Yes, but my advice would be to keep your real beliefs and feelings to yourself until you get into a position of some influence, and then work covertly until the mood changes.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:02 AM
2

Wouldn't it be illegal where they are?
/r/MensRights28/10/20 12:02 PM
17

Surprise, surprise!
/r/MensRights28/10/20 05:38 AM
1

Whereas in practice, of course, it was the reverse.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 05:37 AM
6

Referring to accusers as "victims" shows government departments to be careless, or worse.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 05:35 PM
-2

I suppose you have male lawmakers to thank for that.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 01:35 PM
17

Except, of course, that the law either will not be applied to them, or it will be applied lightly. The UK equivalent has resulted in several hundred men being charged with a hundred or so being imprisoned, and a smaller number of women being charged but only one being sentenced to community service. Everyone will know that this does not reflect real life.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 11:13 AM
4

Signed.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 10:24 AM
12

Australia is going the way Spain has gone, and the UK is not far behind.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 07:54 AM
10

GENEVA CONSENSUS DECLARATION ON PROMOTING WOMEN’S HEALTH AND STRENGTHENING THE FAMILY...and NOT equal responsibilities, of course.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 05:45 PM
9

Now that women and feminists are a majority in the UK parliament, they are starting to do what many of us forecast they would do - namely bring in laws that benefit themselves. Surprise, surprise!
/r/MensRights24/10/20 04:20 PM
9

Correct answer. Gaydom was proscribed because those men didn't play the game.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 02:49 PM
2

He should have known what happens to wealthy men. As Paul Elan has said: "There are no male victims only volunteers."
/r/MensRights22/10/20 02:33 PM
12

You're using the right tag. And, in day's of sex equality the woman should be treated exactly as a man. This will go on so long as men allow it.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 02:29 PM
4

...and keep the taxpayer's money she was given.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 04:25 AM
13

Good to see the sports manager rejecting the politician's demand. Is this the beginning of a turn? Normally, they immediately fire the player.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:48 PM
5

Or, perhaps the wrong individual turned out to be the villain.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:54 AM
529

But they want to be paid the same.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 09:20 AM
4

From a nation known for it.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 02:25 PM
3

Where did it say that?
/r/MensRights20/10/20 09:17 AM
36

A clever use of words. Alleged False Allegations of Rape Between January 2011 and May 2012, the DPP required CPS areas to refer to him all cases involving an allegedly false allegation of rape and/or domestic violence. During that time, there were 5,651 prosecutions for rape but only 35 for making false allegations of rape. A prosecution for making a false allegation of rape is NOT the same as making a false allegation of rape. The former is NOT government policy; indeed, it is considered to be …
/r/MensRights19/10/20 01:01 PM
447

Anti-male madness such as this will work to our advantage.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 10:32 AM
160

Yes, that's so. Female abuse of children is, of course, ignored.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 06:26 AM
235

Did you report your experience to the relevant government authority. They may have thought males leaving the profession was due to choice.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 06:01 AM
6

I'll address this one of your points - which is a classic bit of feminist twisting. "Or the fact there are entire diseases that only affect women that doctors don’t know exist yet because male is the standard they use for all research and most studies are still done on just males?" The reason studies were done on males was not to produce treatments that favored males, but because it was considered more acceptable to use males as guinea pigs rather than put women subjects at risk. The consequence…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 05:46 PM
9

In that situation, men do not need a plan. The single mum and bastard situation will be their responsibility. That is the point my friend is making. Rights should come with responsibilities. At present the woman has the rights and the man has the responsibilities. That needs to end, and, one way or another, it is going to.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 05:09 PM
9

Their actions speak differently. You have fallen for their lies.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 04:35 PM
16

Feminists don't try to prevent extreme feminist views, so I don't regard the male side as a problem.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:45 PM
15

Same here.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:44 PM
72

They allow feminist academics to vandalise articles on men's rights matters - which is why I will not support them financially.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:33 PM
24

Please stop using roads built by males, lady.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:32 PM
4

Women's groups have cornered all the money.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:50 AM
1

Firstly, the argument that because false allegations are rare, which they are not, a man should be judged guilty until proven innocent, is like saying because only a small number of men get breast cancer, they should not be treated. Even if false allegations are tiny - which they are not - the accused should be innocent until proven guilty. The actual reason some people can claim they are rare, is a simple one: the actual figures are manipulated. A program on some famous false rape allegations a…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 07:22 PM
4

Everything isn't enough!
/r/MensRights15/10/20 10:37 AM
2

Exactly. It's the line of argument feminists use often. It's the same as arguing because male cases of breast cancer are rare, male victims should not be treated.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 04:12 PM
44

How can a dementia patient say "I do!"?
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:20 AM
1

A university let an MRA onto its premises? Wonders will never cease!
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:39 PM
1

2014.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 05:19 AM
4

Exactly. You have to toe the line to succeed. Otherwise you will be frozen out. Likewise, in almost all the arts. I wrote a novel a few years ago, forecasting how society would develop if present policies were continued. Needless to say - and it didn't surprise me - nobody would touch it.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 05:55 PM
3

You are absolutely right. Feminists are making complete fools of lawmakers.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:05 PM
5

Why don't they give them pensions?
/r/MensRights08/10/20 08:59 AM
2

It also turns a blind eye to feminist propagandists.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 03:21 PM
1

It's relevant to the post because I'm telling you - as a Welshman - that the men of Wales - generally - do not care how they are treated because their minds are on other things - that is why the Welsh government treats them as it does - it can get away with it!
/r/MensRights06/10/20 07:08 AM
-25

It doesn't matter. Most males in Wales are only interested in the rugby football results and will vote for Labour or Plaid Cymru regardless of how they are treated.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 06:00 AM
10

Please keep us informed of your progress.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:52 PM
474

OK. And is she refusing to use roads made by men, and....
/r/MensRights04/10/20 10:34 AM
19

"I know its easy to get sucked into, however alot of the issues discussed here are not going to affect you in everyday life..." Two responses from me. They affect other innocent men, so I'm happy to help in any way I can. They may well affect me at some later date, so it's best to be prepared.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 07:15 AM
630

I agree entirely. This was also suggested not so long ago. It came to naught because of feminist power.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:39 PM
6

I think politicians will do what feminists want them to do - what's new? They will ban them.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 11:31 AM
1

Might reduce the number of false allegations.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 05:16 AM
10

The way women are treated in prison, she will probably think it is a very good deal. I don't know, but I suspect her fellow female prisoners will not treat her the way a male rapists fellow male prisoners would teach him.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:23 AM
1

"despite the name feminism is about equality for both genders." Nope, it's about more privileges without responsibility for women.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 03:10 PM
2

Feminist brainwashing in the universities.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 10:09 AM
4

The UN should be charged with crimes against humanity.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 10:06 AM
5

I don't believe that was actually said. Didn't the higher court say that only it could change its previous ruling? It also acknowledged that circumstances had changed since its earlier ruling. I also see Harry Crouch has not given up.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 08:13 AM
13

Somebody actually posted a letter from a headmaster a few months ago saying male students were being marked down.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 05:48 AM
13

Refusing to engage in an unequal struggle is pretty toxic? No, I don't think so.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 05:37 AM
3

Neither.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 05:34 AM
14

And all the others are feminist Karens.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:42 PM
38

Look at the names of the authors.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:55 PM
0

We've read of a number of cases here where the father has been granted child support and the mother has refused to pay. The state has done nothing. Father's are, however, relentlessly pursued. This alone sums up what this reddit is all about.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 10:53 AM
3

I think they mean a man should have the right to opt out of paying for a child he does not want.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 10:09 AM
2

Nope. You're just an idiot who does not understand what he reads.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 10:08 AM
2

The earth is flat?.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 10:03 AM
1

Most advanced western countries do.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:56 AM
7

No. You are just stupid.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:55 AM
2

The problem is many women won't let them. They just want the money.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:39 AM
2

A lot of anti-MRAs triggered here. Also, I would guess, a lot of angry fathers of daughters. No more divorce rape, no more free living, no more free children which they will refuse to let the father ever see or have some influence on. Yes, I can see why they are angry. We're doing the right thing, folks.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:39 AM
1

You are just a short way behind Spain. In that country, any woman can have any man jailed for two days on her say-so. Avoid.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:36 AM
7

They, like many laws, indeed do not specify gender. The problem is misandrist judges always use them to benefit women.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:35 AM
19

"Men are expected to work more and do more around the house like women were expected to cook and do more around the house in the 1950s while the mem mostly sat on their asses..." My own experience was different. My mother was a housewife and did the shopping. My father was a locomotive engineer and worked all sorts of hours. When he came home and had had a bite to eat, he worked what we in the UK call an allotment (a vegetable garden) and brought home wonderful produce. In his spare time he main…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:28 AM
2

No. Most of them will go along and allow themselves to be robbed and kicked so long as they can get pussy.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:10 AM
8

He means, I think, that in the USA men have to sign up to the draft in order to get the vote. Women do not.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:09 AM
1

I have read about you're appalling treatment before - have you made any progress in your case? As far as general progress is concerned, yes, I agree, it looks depressing. However, I believe we have made small gains here and there and, as laws get ever more oppressive on males, more and more could join us. The recent treatment of a male in the divorce courts of Canada seems to have created an international stir, and this was a good sign. The biggest thing will be males refusing to vote for anti-m…
/r/MensRights26/09/20 02:21 PM
39

October 2015? Didn't make much of a mark. Still, the fact that it was published by The Guardian is something, I suppose.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 05:07 AM
5

Well done. Please never allow women into your group.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 04:33 AM
2

Because people who have children get a month's leave that people who do not have children have to work.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 07:23 PM
7

No. Because when money is help is needed, it would be "our" child, but when authority is needed it would be "my" child. You would have no authority over the child, because it would always respond: "You are not my father, you can't tell me what to do!"
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:32 PM
1

But still discriminatory against non-parents, I think.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 12:33 PM
3

I agree. It will be discriminatory. The government has mentioned that laws need to be non-discriminatory, but whether they have the guts to stand up to the feminist lobby remains to be seen.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 12:00 PM
9

When male lawmakers are idiotic enough to let man-haters like Harman write laws, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights25/09/20 07:33 AM
9

Well said, but a male patient should be asked if he's happy with the arrangement. If he is not, it should not go ahead.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 01:40 PM
7

Yes, it's a double standard, I agree. And it'll go on until men start saying it's unacceptable. In you case, srely, the "chaperone" should have been male, not only to guard you against being falsely accused.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 01:18 PM
14

I think it would be better for all of us if we simply said we wanted equality. When feminists and others then say we're privileged, or whatever, we can point out the list of things where they are wrong, and ask them, simply, "Don't you want equality?"
/r/MensRights23/09/20 09:10 AM
49

The comments by the government minister (about treating the population equally) are encouraging.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:01 AM
19

Appalling.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 10:12 AM
2

Women can do non-combat duties. The main point is that if men are forced to give up time for the state, women should too.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:36 AM
2

This just shows what every man who has contact with a woman could possibly face.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:30 AM
1

" Of course men are 99% of death in war, because this stats were made before women could enter in the army...." Let there be no doubt; when women are fifty per cent of forces, men will still be the great majority of casualties. In the UK armed forces now, women make up something like 17% of personnel, but still are only about 2% of casualties. They get the same pay and pensions as males, of course.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 05:15 PM
10

"Leading the engagements would be groups such as the Singapore Council of Women’s Organisations, the National Trades Union Congress Women Committee, the People’s Association Women Integration Network and others, said Mr Shanmugam." Only for more privileges for women, I'm afraid. Did he say anything about equalizing military service?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:07 AM
2

"Leading the engagements would be groups such as the Singapore Council of Women’s Organisations, the National Trades Union Congress Women Committee, the People’s Association Women Integration Network and others, said Mr Shanmugam." Only for more privileges for women, I'm afraid. Did he say anything about equalizing military service?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 05:49 AM
5

It has been done, I think.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 05:50 PM
2

One of the few male MPs I will vote for. Amongst other things, wearing an I am a feminist t-shirt, is a no-no.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 03:39 PM
6

It happened in Australia too.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 05:49 AM
33

For several decades, women were allowed to retire five years before men. Some misogyny.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:33 PM
3

Well done. Another small victory, but they are beginning to add up.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 03:31 PM
180

But female votes are easier to lose and gain than male ones.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:17 PM
2

I didn't think they had it in them. But the feminists in the Supreme Court will back the women.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 10:53 AM
5

The police should be searching for the truth, but political correctness has corrupted the entire system. On that program about false rape cases a few days ago, it was actually revealed that three of the most egregious cases would not have been recorded as false allegations because of technicalities. The true number of false allegations is not known, because the numbers are fiddled, officially and deliberately so. The whole system is rotten to the core, in the interests of political correctness.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 10:24 AM
1

Twenty-fifteen. Nobody agreed, obviously.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 04:32 AM
5

I think the best line of attack against this, is the one of consent. Nobody should have the right to have this done to a young boy, but if he wants it done to himself when he grows old enough to take the decision, it's his body, his choice
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:14 PM
5

Glad to hear you're happier now, and that we could be of some assistance.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 06:00 PM
10

Even Icelandic female politicians gave in when they got letters from US senators "requesting" i.e. demanding, that they withdraw the proposed changes in the interests of Iceland's tiny Jewish community.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:25 PM
7

The same thing happened in Iceland.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 11:52 AM
1

I didn't watch the programme and so didn't know that Liam Allen's case wasn't recorded as a false accusation. But it doesn't surprise me. They also refused to change the de Freitas case to one of false accusation when it because evident that was what it was. The reason, of course, it to support the politically correct claim that false accusations are rare. They also shunt 14% of proven false rape accusations into a group they call "no crime" to again keep the figures low. Did they mention "no cr…
/r/MensRights12/09/20 04:45 AM
5

...and still vote for lawmakers who...
/r/MensRights11/09/20 04:14 PM
64

Note this bit: Most importantly of all, we’re told that false allegations are only officially recorded if the accuser ADMITS their complaint was untrue. This fact in itself utterly destroys so many feminist arguments about statistics on this issue and it clearly shows such official statistics are therefore a nonsense.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 09:13 AM
16

And men should have the reverse. So, no laws against "misogyny".
/r/MensRights11/09/20 07:31 AM
3

And what is the Australian government doing about it?
/r/MensRights11/09/20 04:39 AM
3

And, I suppose, men have male-dominated legislatures to blame for this.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 04:32 AM
84

Males should be calling for a return to single-sex schools and colleges. That's my view.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 01:04 PM
224

Great story. And one to encourage other males who suffer the same sort of experience as yourself. Thanks for posting it. One question: was the false accuser at the same school as yourself?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:55 PM
4

I haven't had time to read all of it, but does it take into account some countries having male only national service and later pension ages for men?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 04:34 AM
2

Exactly. People like her don't need to be feared; they need to be swatted.
/r/MGTOW09/09/20 04:39 PM
1

I could make the obvious deduction from that statement, but had better not!
/r/MGTOW09/09/20 04:38 PM
11

This one is feminists shooting themselves in the foot, actually, which shows yet again that they are either liars or idiots. The reason why drugs were tested on men and therefore work better on them was not to ensure that men were the main beneficiaries of the developed drugs, but that if the unproven products were in fact harmful to human beings, it would be male testers who would suffer the ill effects and not women.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 04:28 AM
7

Why is she being allowed to do this?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:49 PM
6

What is the government doing about it?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 05:40 PM
1

No, it isn't fair. Why are you putting up with it?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 01:44 PM
11

I'm told the Chinese can do a spine transplant for those members who voted to let women be members for $1000, and if they need a ball transplant as well, $1100.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 01:27 PM
7

Satire. But it will get to that stage if men don't start saying no.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 07:15 AM
36

Avoid. Do your shopping elsewhere.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 05:24 AM
2

Silly fool. Still, I suppose his job depends on it.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 04:13 AM
25

Good idea! When you are beyond her reach, write to her dissecting her bullshit and tell her you were not taken in.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 06:25 PM
8

The 96% who walk "free" (probably, they have been emotionally and probably reputationally damaged for life) may be rapists and, equally, may be falsely accused. Since law enforcement could not get them convicted in spite of straining every sinew, and with the entire brainwashed system being against them, it is most likely they are falsely accused.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 04:03 PM
4

Yet more attempts to get more and more preferential treatment for women. Avoid!
/r/MensRights07/09/20 09:30 AM
7

Feminists have a wonderful weapon in the the word "misogyny". What it actually means is, anything they don't like.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 04:19 AM
13

Its good to hear that, because the males among that age group are the ones that will suffer most if this b/s is allowed to go on. And destroying feminist arguments will be a turkey shoot for anyone who has the guts to do it.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 04:14 AM
1

I think that's possible. They can track everybody's movements and find where they are now. Whether that department would do so, I don't know.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:20 PM
11

Long ago, in "the Victorian" era, I think dads came out on top, but, over a period of decades, and more so in recent years with feminist demands and weak politicians pandering to hem, it's got very bad for dads indeed. That's my take on it.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:38 PM
2

As I understand it, she would have to prove you are the father of the child, first.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 11:31 AM
1

Now that it's been mentioned, I remember one of the early claimers of "only two per cent are false", was a female detective in New York, who, I now remember reading, based her claim on no actual evidence. The other was Koss - the woman who claimed women who had had sex while drunk have been raped, and, women who did not like the way they had been looked at had been sexually assaulted. In the latest piece of feminist b/s Laura Bates claims men have a greater chance of being raped themselves than …
/r/MensRights06/09/20 09:52 AM
1

"What’s equally important to know, however, is that false rape accusations almost never have serious consequences...." Nope. Almost any false rape accusation connected to a name has devastating consequences. The male is effectively ruined for life.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:38 AM
13

Fantastic news, and a (rare) defeat for the feminist bigots who, for too long, have been allowed to rule Australia.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 04:19 AM
1

The 2% was from Koss, I believe, and not based on any factual evidence (like almost everything else that woman came up with). A USAF study came out with a much higher figure - I cannot remember what it was, but it may have been higher than fifty per cent, I think.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 04:44 PM
3

Good comments.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 09:25 AM
6

The old "privilege" trick. Such as waiting another five years for your state pension (in the UK); getting a fraction spent on your healthcare; being the only sex to be drafted; getting higher sentences for the same offence; having no defence against rape by a female; getting poorer treatment in the family and divorce courts... I could go on.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 05:09 AM
5

If men keep giving, they will keep asking.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 04:45 PM
17

Because the dice are loaded for them to win.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 02:45 PM
2

I would think it is b/s, even for Australia. I have asked ThirdTurnip to explain this claim before and he did not do so.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 01:20 PM
2

In Australia, men, even gay ones, literally don't have the right to refuse to date a woman in the workplace... Where, in Australian law does it actually say this?
/r/MensRights02/09/20 10:06 AM
9

Thanks for telling us. I have this site in my favourites bar, so I don't have to search for it. Incidentally, I've just paid a visit to r/menslib and am satisfied to see we are twice as popular as they are. I've also brought up duck/duck again and will be using that instead of Google when convenient.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 04:10 AM
1

Good points.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:49 PM
2

We of course would not allow anything approaching this in pretty much any other area.... Nor would legislators allow it if the targets were female offenders.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:37 PM
15

Are we certain the law applies to females forcing sex on males?
/r/MensRights01/09/20 04:19 PM
89

That figures. The country is infested with feminist bigots and their lapdogs. Men in Australia are not going to have any rights at all if they don't wake up.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 01:09 PM
2

Try to make certain she has as much to lose as you do. It isn't so difficult these days.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 07:59 AM
7

Yes, indeed. Men are finally going onto the attack.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 03:44 PM
3

And who allowed this? Male politicians.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 03:39 PM
9

Good question.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 05:34 AM
6

Yes, it's a double standard which, from my observations has only been going on for a couple of decades, or so. It's because men do not complain, fearing, perhaps, being accused of harassment. Women would not be so timid. I now never use urinals for this reason.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 09:14 AM
2

Exactly. It's obviously fun.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 06:28 AM
3

Au contraire! They owe men for the world they built for them; the men who went down mines and got lung disease to create energy and warmth; the men killed doing dangerous jobs so that societies could enter the modern age; the men who died fighting for their freedom... I could go on.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 06:20 AM
1

A surprising number seem to still be so.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 05:42 AM
229

Has the UN heard about this, and, if so, does it care?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 10:27 AM
3

They will probably change their tune when male voters stop voting for them. In the UK, I do just that.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 10:03 AM
10

Because the BBC is no longer concerned with the truth.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 05:46 AM
1

She's pulling the old feminist trick, which far too many males, and especially male lawmakers, let them get away with. She's describing even false accusers as "victims".
/r/MensRights23/08/20 09:54 AM
1

Which is one reason I, and many others, are less likely to be patriotic that Americans. Americans know the country belongs to them; we know the country belongs to the Queen.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 01:26 PM
2

That is the impression I've got from numerous sources in a long life; one example you often see, is female changing spaces being shielded, but males ones being less so - because males are thought to be keen to look, but females not so. But if you, like sorebum, has a major problem with this claim, I am happy to let it go. But I will not change my mind. As another poster has said, ask a male stripper, or a male who wears a kilt.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 09:27 AM
9

It is up to males to decide what they feel and experience, and males alone. What females think males feel is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 09:02 AM
2

Assassinated?
/r/MensRights20/08/20 08:33 AM
-1

But the education minister is not head of the government. Why is her boss letting her do it?
/r/MensRights20/08/20 04:47 AM
6

I posted exactly what I experienced.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 06:41 PM
1

Can you ask your feminist friends to start doing just that, then? Because, to date, and after, what, a century of feminism, they haven't yet started.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 05:39 PM
95

There is a widespread - and erroneous - belief that women are not interested in men's bodies, and of course, males are obsessed with female ones. It's all down to women being better actors. Many years ago, my local sports centre was modernised and, shortly after, I went along to try it on a male-only sauna night. I thought the builders had done a very good job, with some superb woodwork in the ceilings and skylights on the flat roof. I told the attendant that I thought this was so. He said: "The…
/r/MensRights19/08/20 05:32 PM
11

And the males in government allow it? Appalling.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 05:02 PM
2

Exactly. We are getting to a point where males, especially, in positions of power and influence are seeming to feel that females are untouchable.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 12:46 PM
3

You are right. What appalls me is the lack of action against these sorts of things by males with power. The allowing, indeed encouraging by means of financial incentives, of false claims of rape and sexual assault, is due to male politicians pandering to feminist claims that large numbers of offenders are getting away with it, and the disregarding of the damage done to innocent males is scandalous. While victims should be encouraged and helped to come forward, the reputations and livelihoods of …
/r/MensRights19/08/20 11:53 AM
2

Can you link to where they actually say this?
/r/MensRights19/08/20 11:21 AM
5

They will twist themselves in verbal and logical knots rather that come down in favour of a male.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:07 PM
2

But is sexual assault of males by females included?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 09:31 AM
3

You're right to take the approach you do. Keep your beliefs to yourself; just watch, take note, and wait. For now.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 07:30 AM
14

As Paul Elam has said: "There are no victims, only volunteers." Men have seen what happens many times before. They have only themselves to blame if it happens to them.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:47 AM
1

I only wish you could.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:04 AM
19

Good to see so many female commenters seeing her for what she really is. Now, as a Brit, my next hope is Johnny ruins that crapsheet The Sun.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 10:07 AM
4

That's because male voters tend to continue voting for politicians who actively legislate against them. Jess Phillips for example?
/r/MensRights13/08/20 06:12 PM
2

I never use urinals these days for that reason.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:26 PM
22

It's because they continue to vote for politicians that treat them with contempt.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 04:03 AM
1

In other words, it needs to be made easier for them to understand.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 05:14 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 12:43 PM
44

Women don't look at men?
/r/MensRights11/08/20 07:24 AM
14

The new "Domestic abuse commissioner" in the UK (a former women's group organizer - yes, you've guessed it!) will be paid £160k a year, and - wait for it - a big salary is no longer enough for these women, they know they can demand whatever they want from morally corrupt politicians - she will work only three days a week.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 04:40 AM
2

Signed.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 04:34 AM
1

They do. And male lawmakers are the worst offenders.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 04:53 AM
2

Disgusting. And from a "Conservative" government too.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 04:29 AM
5

And her feminist supporters will still claim she was innocent, liars and twisters that they are.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 09:33 AM
1

Compare the fuss about this lady's suicide with the almost total lack of interest in the suicide not only of the wrongly accused Jay Cheshire but also of his mother as a result of his own tragic case.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 04:26 AM
3

Compare the fuss about this lady's suicide with the almost total lack of interest in the suicide not only of the wrongly accused Jay Cheshire but also of his mother as a result of his own tragic case.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 04:19 AM
5

Tell her she can try.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 08:22 AM
29

Looks as if they are getting worried.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 02:48 PM
8

It's because they envy you.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 01:37 PM
28

Do the feminists who scream when a man holds a door open for them also scream when a man stands back for them to be first into the lifeboats on a sinking ship or first off a ditched aircraft, I wonder?
/r/MensRights31/07/20 05:14 AM
0

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 02:07 PM
5

Good move. Get set up now before feminism in Germany gets as far as it has in the UK.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 02:06 PM
17

"55130 of rapes recorded by the police..." Let me correct that yet again - and I'm really get tired of doing this. If MRAs continue to let feminists and their fellow travellers get away with this one, they have only themselves to blame for the outcome. That should read, of course: "55130 of ALLEGED rapes recorded by the police..."
/r/MensRights30/07/20 08:50 AM
1

Aiming at male perps, only, of course. No thanks.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 01:55 PM
1

Interesting to see so many young females greeting him when he arrives at the court.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:57 PM
9

There are a lot of other drawbacks.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:43 AM
-2

The pressure would have come mainly from men, of course, though, today, feminist would have claimed they are too valuable to die.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:32 AM
20

Nothing about getting more men into traditional women's fields, I suppose, or women into the more unpleasant and dangerous jobs?
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:26 AM
6

To me, it simply means a striving for sex equality. Give me compete sex equality and I'll be happy; it means female offenders get exactly the same prison sentences as males; females are treated in the family courts exactly the same as males; females have exactly the same obligations as males; and, above all, the law is blind to gender.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:59 AM
7

Is anyone aware of Wiki pages criticizing feminism in any way? The "Kill all men!" kind of feminism, for example?
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:04 AM
25

I think I can understand why establishment figures denounce MGTOW. It shows that more and more men are refusing to play their game: man-up; pay your taxes; do the dirty and dangerous jobs; protect the country in time of war....
/r/MensRights27/07/20 08:46 AM
7

That sub, of course, only represents the feelings of its members. And some of them have had some pretty horrific experiences. So their posts are understandable in my view.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 08:18 AM
34

It's poisonous Wiki. They let feminist academics "edit" their entries with predictable results.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 07:37 AM
1

How can they justify leaving it on your record when you prove it to be false?
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:23 AM
2

Indeed. If you feel this sort of thing coming up, it might be best to be first to ask for a restraining order.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 06:35 PM
7

Would I want women to be included? Yes, I would, because they would not have to be expected to fight. They can do other duties thus freeing up men and, in the days of sex equality, they too should have to give up their time and serve the state if men do.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:33 PM
7

That was 2013. I haven't noticed a difference.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:28 AM
3

Who downvoted my initial post? I was trying to say that the police would only be interested in male perps, for God's sake!
/r/MensRights25/07/20 01:57 PM
6

I think that will be the case if females are charged.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 12:12 PM
12

I meant that the police expect the perpetrators to be male.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:49 AM
-15

By other males, I suspect.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:07 AM
2

Australian men who really have to marry, should restrict their choice to women with homes.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 05:12 PM
4

Indeed. Feminists are now running amok, changing laws to benefit women, fully aware that most male MPs are amoral surrender monkeys who will do nothing to safeguard men's and boy's rights. With a few exceptions, such as Philip Davies. I would vote for Davies if he were my MP even though I don't agree with everything he does. His stand for males overrides everything else as far as I am concerned, as does any MPs support of feminist policies in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 09:46 AM
12

I remember, some months ago, coming across an online EU poll about how the EU was dealing with inequality. Most of the questions were along the lines of: "Do you think more help should be given to women in employment?" I answered each with: "You should be tackling men's later retirement ages and gender-specific conscription in some EU countries!"
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:20 AM
4

Sarah Champion? She married a semi-famous explorer in the hope that that would advance her career. He agreed to marry her provided she signed a prenup agreement. She agreed to this. When, however, it turned out that the marriage was doing nothing for her career, she demanded a divorce. Her husband agreed provided she honored the prenup. She refused demanding half of his assets. When he resisted, she attacked him. I believe she got away with about £200k. The second case, I think you are referring…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:59 AM
6

In the UK, the new domestic abuse laws need to be used against offenders.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 08:10 AM
2

Another Flood of nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:41 AM
1

I'm standoffish, more due to being a bit of an introvert and shy-ish. And, yes, I've been approached.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 06:28 AM
6

Well educate them first, and, in my experience, that means all of them. Once they start behaving like they believe in gender equality we can begin cooperating with them.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:43 AM
17

And you think they will stand with you? They have done nothing for men, indeed, they have done their best to sabotage attempts to help men.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 04:49 AM
1

Sex equality.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 04:33 AM
3

I'm not sure about the fifty-fifty split of assets after divorce. This would still disadvantage too many men. I would prefer: only assets acquired after marriage to be split on divorce.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 04:32 AM
6

It's getting worse because males do not retaliate. Which they can do, easily, and devastatingly if they try.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 04:23 AM
5

Indeed, and our response should be the one the feminists would sprout. "Poor man. What could have driven him to it?"
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:31 AM
2

The way men are regularly treated in the courts means this does not surprise me. Nor will I condemn it.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:06 AM
9

Not bizarre at all. Spot on, in fact.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 06:32 PM
18

It really is time that demands were made to bring back single sex colleges and universities. I'm sure feminists and women's groups will support such a move.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 03:50 PM
16

So a husband has no right of sex with his wife, and, if he forces himself on her will be charged with rape, but if he tries to stop her forcing herself on him, he will be charged with domestic violence? These politicians are weak fools.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 02:35 PM
2

No! Wash it yourself.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 07:51 AM
4

Some nations think they can. I believe the US and UK now see their female military personnel being involved in fighting. The real argument, however, is that they do not need to be involved in fighting: they can do other duties, this freeing up males, and in a truly equal society should be expected to give up the same time as men and experience the same inconveniences and same career drawbacks as males.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 04:53 AM
2

History.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 06:44 PM
1

But having had a good time in the meantime, and together with what one wishes to retain of one's fortune.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 10:24 AM
1

They are closing them down.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 06:11 PM
5

I'd be happy to contribute.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 07:35 AM
6

"What is the psychological mechanism behind this?" One may be that they think that by siding with extremist women they might get a better chance of having sex, especially if they are particularly unsuccessful for some reason or another.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 07:18 AM
6

But as rape victims of other males, I would guess. So, only partial progress there.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 04:43 AM
2

Yet people like her are appointed by "conservative" politicians. It makes you wonder how stupid they are.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 07:34 PM
13

Perhaps it is because there has been a catastrophic decline in evidence that rapes have been committed.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 04:55 PM
5

I think Marc is a terrible loss to the MRM. And right at the time when it is making obvious progress.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 10:30 AM
4

"It can be perpetrated by either sex..." The big problem is that society does not take it seriously when it is perpetrated by women.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 07:08 AM
3

You'd have to have a heart of stone not to laugh.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 07:52 AM
11

We don't have to. Women have more rights and privileges than we can dream of already.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 07:22 AM
6

Move from the white ones immediately, if you're a dad.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 06:49 PM
2

It will be a wonderful blow against these people if Depp wins.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 04:08 PM
2

You have a very rare wife. Where can I find one?
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:38 AM
1

Good piece.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:37 AM
6

I hope he bankrupts The Sun.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 05:29 AM
5

As Paul Elam has said: "There are no victims, only volunteers!"
/r/MensRights10/07/20 05:59 PM
9

Thought so. I refused their request for a donation, citing their anti-male balance as a reason.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 06:46 PM
4

Let us know if they let it remain.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 05:19 PM
2

I would go further. If a male wants to hate females, that is entirely up to him. Nobody else should have a say in the matter. (Although of course, they can try to persuade him to do otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 07:00 PM
11

I'll just draw your attention to two things. " domestic abuse is one of this country’s most common crimes..." Doesn't the fact that the "Domestic Abuse Commissioner" is only required to work for three days a week, (for £160000 a year) suggest that it is not? " Other protections include a ban on abusers cross-examining their victims in family courts in England and Wales..." More feminist manipulation of the language, I'm afraid. An "abuser" is not cross-examining a "victim". An accused is cross-e…
/r/MensRights07/07/20 06:50 PM
47

Surely, it is up to a man, not a feminist, a woman, and certainly not an offender, to decide whether or not he was raped, assaulted, or anything else? What women, feminists, or any other female person or animal, thinks, is of no interest whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 06:42 PM
14

I believe a feminist concern built a bridge in Florida that was hailed as a feminist masterpiece, something feminism could be proud of, until it collapsed killing several people. Then, anyone who pointed out that the thing had been designed by feminists, was immediately labelled as a misogynist. Feminists are amazing; they are always innocent.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 05:22 PM
3

With the type of sex dolls now becoming available, I think it will be the incels who will turn out to be the lucky ones totally avoiding headaches, false accusations, alimony, and every drawback experienced by men who are involved with the real thing.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 04:14 PM
30

It's more or less the same in the entire western world. What do you expect when the scripts are written by feminists and their stupid male fellow travellers?
/r/MensRights07/07/20 04:00 PM
9

I don't know. But even a win here will do a lot for male victims of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 03:25 PM
2

Canada is pretty bad. Take a look at the videos of Johntheother.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 07:05 AM
2

I used to love the BBC; now I hate it. I dumped my television set a couple of years ago so that I do not have to pay for a licence. If I can do any more to damage the corporation, I'll do it.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 07:03 AM
1

She is the winner of an all-female short list, and so has never had to experience a hard fight against an able opponent. There are males in parliament who have got to where they have by a hard slog against other able applicants and they will destroy her in any argument.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 05:46 AM
3

Appalling. Feminists have corrupted government in the UK.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 07:31 PM
2

Useful idiots who are totally unaware that they are being boiled alive. If this goes through, in a year or two, Creasey and her sisters will be back for more.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 11:36 AM
13

Signed. It's a disgrace, and the lefty parties are degenerates, although the Cons are not much better
/r/MensRights06/07/20 11:31 AM
3

I notice a coterie of useful idiots are supporting Creasey in her endeavours. They are totally unaware that they, and other males because of their stupidity, are being slowly boiled alive, because, in a year or two, if this passes, Creasey will be back for more.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 07:10 AM
2

Were the inequalities you mention introduced when the legislature was largely male, or have they been brought in after feminist influence became more obvious. And can you/have you brought them to the notice of your representative, or is it not worthwhile?
/r/MensRights04/07/20 03:03 PM
1

They won't do anything so long as male voters are stupid enough to vote for them regardless.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 08:47 AM
1

I look at it from time to time, but don't find it all that appealing. The way the page jumps a few moments after you click, often causes me to miss my target. Also, the latest post is about five years old, I believe - although the ones before it are more recent.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:36 AM
3

I'm not sure, but you could make a big difference down there.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 04:50 AM
1

Did it stay?
/r/MensRights03/07/20 06:40 PM
1

Has anyone here read the book? Has it ever been subjected to a "masculist" critique? To a statistician's critique? I think the answer to those questions is no. It had a lot of good reviews, but my guess is that it's the same old thing. It lists all the things that support the author's argument, but carefully avoids mentioning all the advantages, privileges, and preferential treatment women receive.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 06:39 PM
2

Exactly. Any male lawmakers who propose any changes that will help male defendants only need to be asked: "Don't you want to help female victims", and they are finished. They should say that they, like everybody else, wants to help victims, once they are proven to be victims in a court of law, but that that needs to be proved via evidence, and the defendant should be allowed to challenge that evidence.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 02:14 PM
10

Indeed. I did know, of course, as do most of us. Thanks for reminding me.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 09:03 AM
45

Appalling. Why do male lawmakers allow this sort of thing?
/r/MensRights03/07/20 08:35 AM
8

That is what is coming to the UK, the USA, western nations, Scandinavia, Canada, and Australia, unless male politicians stop giving in to women's groups. Scotland is passing an anti-misogyny law, which means that anything a male does that a woman does not like can put him in court.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 07:42 AM
4

Looks good. I support them.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 06:12 PM
2

Hit them for billions.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 06:12 PM
6

Looks good. I give them my full support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/20 06:08 PM
10

Let us hope more good news is to follow.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 01:28 PM
22

If you find a weaker female candidate is promoted in preference to yourself, I would resign immediately. So should every male.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 06:35 AM
1

Indeed. In those cases, and at a time when the police will look for crumbs of evidence, and indeed hide material that will prove the accused to be totally innocent in some cases, and when judges have complained that some cases have been wasting the court's time, since there is no hope whatever of getting a conviction, the women's groups continue to claim, and are allowed to claim, without evidence, that rapists are going free. What should be happening of course is that the police should be spend…
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:40 AM
1

So the figure is based on polls and surveys, which can be very unreliable, and is therefore not a fact. And my suspicion is that in this area, especially, it is likely to be more unreliable than most, since too many people, and feminists, especially, have the greatest incentives to lie.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:33 AM
2

You state the figure as a fact, so where does this fact come from?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 06:52 PM
3

In the UK one in five rapes is reported to police... Where does that figure come from?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:34 PM
4

And I believe Germany recently went in the opposite direction and stopped compensation for alleging rape. Claims of having been raped immediately went down.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:41 PM
6

To which I should have added: the same as now, but a bit more.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:24 PM
15

Domination for women; slavery for men.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:01 PM
6

In his presentation to the ICMI18 conference, the proven falsely accused Patrick Graham uses police and women's group figures for 2017 to prove that during that year, and according to those figures, 33000 women lied about being raped. (At about 08.44 in his presentation.) Which shows the official figures for false accusations to be a nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:22 PM
16

Presumably, the accused men (they are not rapists until a court of law finds them guilty of rape) are being released because there is no evidence they have raped anyone.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 09:44 AM
4

I agree entirely. However, your last sentence uses the feminist trick of referring to accusers as "victims", and the accused as "attackers". Deciding accusers are victims and the accused are attackers should be up to a court of law and a jury alone, and not to feminist ideologues or anyone else not aware of this feminist trick..
/r/MensRights01/07/20 09:28 AM
2

Yes. A tiny bit of progress.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 08:17 AM
2

Nothing any reasonable person can disagree with there. I would just ask that reddit applies similar rules to every single reddit.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:03 AM
23

An enjoyable read. And a feminist I could cooperate with. But I fear your type of feminist is very rare. Nice to hear from you though. Keep in touch wit this reddit. Good luck!
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:09 PM
1

I'm certain the tide will turn eventually. There are signs of this happening already.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:44 AM
7

I'm surprised they banned those!
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:42 AM
2

Can somebody tell us briefly what the lines of these subreddits were?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:39 AM
8

I agree. Please tell us what happens. As many of us have discovered, it has intentionally been written to mislead.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:31 AM
4

I agree. I don't know what the position here in the UK is, perhaps somebody can enlighten me?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:02 AM
1

Have it done in another state?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:00 AM
3

It got him a hug - something he hadn't had for years, I suppose.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 05:26 PM
125

Appalling. I think you need to move out of the area as soon as you are comfortably able to do so. Women lie regularly in order to "get even" I know from personal experience of working in an office, and although it had nothing to do with sex, was pretty annoying in any case. More people will be along to give you further advice, and the most important thing you need to bear in mind is that you are not the only one. Do not consider suicide. That will let them win.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 11:33 AM
2

I take it most posters here are in the US? In the UK, as I understand it, a male can still use the argument that he "had reasonable belief that consent had been given" as a defence. As far as recording is concerned, in most other jurisdictions, and even in the UK, for that matter, I think one form or another of it is now absolutely essential. One way of doing it would be to ask the woman first, if she will agree to everything being recorded. If she will not agree, then walk away. As far as surre…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 07:29 AM
15

Don't you are too valuable to the rest of us.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 05:19 AM
22

I've signed a number of their petitions; never again.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 05:18 AM
77

WE must stop cooperating with Change. org as of now.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 04:14 AM
2

We could all go over to Mike Buchanan's J4MB site. Or A Voice for Men. Both will resist removal to the end.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 04:08 AM
7

I'll do my best too; but I'll have to leave the technicalities to others.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 03:15 PM
4

Spot on. Male dominated governance of the past bent over backwards to ensure women were not disadvantaged. Like banning women from working down mines. This was not to protect men's jobs, but to protect women from lung disease and so on. Female dominated governments of the future will do no such thing; they will put females first, middle, and last.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:16 AM
2

From what I have just read, the demand has now been dropped, with the help, surprisingly, of the man's female MP.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:09 AM
2

Fed by appeasing male politicians.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:06 AM
1

And I believe the military study was very carefully done.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 04:02 AM
5

It reached the required number last time - not so long ago, in fact - and was rejected. I know because I signed it.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:59 PM
5

This has been done before, and rejected by the appropriate government department.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:57 PM
10

Paul Gambacchini experienced something very similar. He said: "You finally learn who your real friends are!"
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:08 PM
1

Good one!
/r/MensRights27/06/20 03:51 PM
15

They can try, I suppose.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 03:39 PM
38

And the woman remains anonymous. Why?
/r/MensRights27/06/20 03:38 PM
29

Somebody should ask him again after he's been raped.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:59 AM
246

In the UK, men pay over 70% of taxes. The NHS spends eight times as much on women's health.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 11:58 AM
8

"I can never understand how feminists advocate for this and pretend that it’s “equality”. "pretend" is the important word there, of course. What they are actually doing is using past inequalities - which, in any case, are largely fictitious, to get more privileges and preferential treatment for themselves.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 09:06 AM
11

Still, a rare, and hopefully, increasingly common welcome response.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:59 AM
3

These have:
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:55 AM
1

I believe the current UK government - as part of a wider enquiry - is indeed going to look into why working class boys do so badly in school. A small much-needed move in the right direction.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:52 AM
8

After about only five years together. I'll take it as less of a loss, and a further warning to males in this country.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:40 AM
1

Ah!
/r/MensRights26/06/20 03:18 PM
10

I'm not American, and don't follow US politics, but am I right in thinking this new bill is intended to allow positive discrimination to help women, and, indeed, anyone who is not a white male? And, if so, does federal law allow this?
/r/MensRights26/06/20 12:42 PM
18

And what has our useless government done about it? …...
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:14 PM
3

It's real, is it? I thought the whisky I drank last night was making me delirious
/r/MensRights21/06/20 07:39 PM
1

True, but, as sexually active, highly successful men will find out if anything goes wrong, they will do no better than men they despise, because the laws and the system are equally loaded against them.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 06:47 AM
5

I've had a glance, and the new German lines seem genuine. The states involved have also called on other states t do likewise. With a couple of UK police forces now doing something similar, it looks as if we're making actual progress.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 04:47 AM
6

That makes two forces aware of the problem by my reckoning.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 01:04 PM
1

And what are male lawmakers doing about it?
/r/MensRights20/06/20 11:50 AM
2

...and invent things, and build things, and make things, and write things, and compose things, and....
/r/MensRights20/06/20 10:47 AM
8

Because no males in power have the guts to say: "No!"
/r/MensRights20/06/20 09:30 AM
2

They have one thing right, then.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 06:37 PM
1

Ministry of Justice figures. Easy to look up.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 09:29 AM
3

Being influenced by feminist subs, I suppose. But don't worry, it has a long way to go before it equals theirs. Which, in some ways, disappoints me. And it's the reason, I think, why they are so vicious in their attacks on men and boys. They think we are afraid of them, because we pussyfoot about and are far too polite, and, dare I say it, gentlemanly (let me interpret that word: surrender-monkey). They declared war on us many decades ago, and it is only now are we very belatedly beginning to fi…
/r/MensRights18/06/20 05:39 PM
2

Except that some allegations are seven and more years old.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 04:23 PM
1

I haven't watched the video, but if, as is implied below she thinks ALL boys are rapists, and I don't know where she is located, but in the UK there are about 3k annual convictions for rape (let's stick to facts and not wander off into what people "believe" or think, or want) in a male population of about 30 million. What percentage is that? I don't know, but I am fairly certain it isn't "all".
/r/MensRights18/06/20 04:13 PM
7

"Digital strip searches..." Handing over your phone is nothing at all compared to the actual physical searches many falsely accused males are subjected to on the words of false accusers. And Baird and Wistrich once again pull the feminist trick - and are allowed to pull the feminist trick of referring to accusers as "victims" and "survivors", and are allowed to get away with it. At this stage in investigations, they are no such thing. The correct way to describe them is "accusers". Calling them …
/r/MensRights18/06/20 04:50 AM
1

"Digital strip searches..." Handing over your phone is nothing at all compared to the actual physical searches many falsely accused males are subjected to on the words of false accusers. And Baird and Wistrich once again pull the feminist trick - and are allowed to pull the feminist trick of referring to accusers as "victims" and "survivors", and are allowed to get away with it. At this stage in investigations, they are no such thing. The correct way to describe them is "accusers". Calling them …
/r/MensRights18/06/20 04:45 AM
1

Never to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 09:44 AM
165

They simultaneously did a "mass silence" about conscription.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 04:38 PM
6

When terrorists take hostages and then decide to release the female ones, have the women ever refused to be released unless their male partners were released too? Same with women and children first situations.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 04:36 PM
3

Agreed. It isn't simple, is it? However, they have done something specifically for males. What have British governments (of any hue) done specifically for males: nowt; zero. Nor would they have changed the pension ages if they hadn't been forced to. They continue to push special privileges for women, knowing that male dopes will continue to vote for them regardless.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:55 AM
4

Peter Bottomley? Surprise, surprise. I thought he was a mangina of the first water.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 07:52 AM
5

Agreed. Young men were helped too. And there was another thing. Pension ages. For several decades, men, including myself, had to wait five years more than women for their state pension. Male lawmakers were responsible for this. The EU made them change it. Would they have changed it without EU pressure. I don't think so. The state pension is such a tiny part of MP's pension income that they wouldn't have cared less.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 05:00 AM
9

Note the large part played in the above by European institutions. Would UK courts have done the same for men? I really don't think so. And most British men would have done nothing abut it; they may have complained, but that would have been all. And, as for the men who would have continued to campaign for changes in the law? Most British males would have told them to "man up", and accept being treated as second class citizens. I don't agree with everything the EU does - with such a large organisa…
/r/MensRights13/06/20 04:36 AM
2

Taking the view proposed by the op will only encourage more vicious attacks from more extreme feminist ideologues. They will think we are afraid of them or cannot counter their arguments. As I have posted earlier, if somebody is beating you around the head with a club, you don't just stand there letting them go on doing it and saying: "I'm for male rights...I'm for male rights..."
/r/MensRights12/06/20 01:17 PM
2

Since it will almost entirely be applied to males, almost nobody in parliament will care. No UK male should vote for them.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 11:21 AM
3

They should indeed, but when is it going to happen? Never, of course, because not a single politician, judge, or law enforcement officer has ever called for it, quite the reverse.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 12:10 PM
65

A dystopian novel? It's already been foreseen in The End of Men by Carla Bowman. In my case, I am at that stage in my life where I shall miss most of it, but I really do think that the parents of male children need to wake up to what male politicians are allowing to happen, indeed supporting, presumably in the belief that it will not affect them personally and so don't care. People like Biden, for example, but he is only one of very many.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 12:07 PM
6

I've done my bit by dumping my television.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 12:31 PM
554

And as long as men continue to put up with it, this sort of thing will go on.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 12:30 PM
18

It has too many feminists in management positions. They corrupt everything they touch, leading us to a Soviet-style state if ever they gain supreme power. Only news that supports the feminist agenda will be tolerated and published.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 08:47 AM
2

Which is why I will never fund either in any way; I may read their stuff, but only if it's free.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 08:45 AM
3

The wording shows how gynocentric male politicians are.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 12:00 PM
4

Or, to be more precise, in non-married men.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 11:31 AM
6

Problem is, in the UK the prison is a rest home.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 11:13 AM
3

There is nothing gendered in this law, as far as the article depicts it... Even if there were, it would still pass.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 09:24 AM
8

Do you think this law will be applied gender-neutrally? Call me a sceptical bar steward if you like, but I don't, nor do I think that is the intention. What is the intention? Let me guess. To get more female votes for male politicians?
/r/MensRights09/06/20 07:49 AM
7

Male politicians serving the sisterhood again.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 04:17 AM
12

At least the judge did mention the effect on the young man, whereas, usually, they are only concerned with the suffering of the false accuser.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 09:43 AM
4

Good.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:18 AM
3

If somebody keeps hitting you over the head with a club, you don't let them go on doing it, and just keep saying: "I want sex equality; I want sex equality; I want..."
/r/MensRights30/05/20 12:56 PM
3

Regard her simply as someone never to have a relationship with and to avoid as much as possible.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:46 AM
2

Only one force, so far, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 05:28 AM
9

Only one force, unfortunately. Let's hope it spreads.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 05:25 AM
6

He was saved by my colleague. He simply could not have done it. I doubt anything happened to the woman - except, perhaps, a few salutes!
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:47 PM
6

A colleague I worked with told me he had travelled home from British national service with a colleague and they went back to camp three days later. The same afternoon, the commander called them all on parade and a woman was produced. She was led in front of them all, and pointed to my colleague's colleague. She pointed to him and said: "He's the one!" She told them, apparently, that he had raped her the day before.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:31 PM
2

And, as the feminists demand more and more special treatment, men's situation will get even worse. This has only really got underway in the last few decades, We are already seeing wrongly-accused men suffer because of this, and men's gynocentrism, is mostly for blame.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:56 AM
3

How many times has this happened? With the woman generally remaining anonymous.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:52 AM
5

I agree with Lethn, but would add two things. Many men, too many men, absorb themselves in their interests, sport being one of the most common - how many men have I seen buy a newspaper and open it to the sports pages? There are two main reasons for this, I think - a desire to get away from the real world, and a feeling that issues brought up in these pages, for example, will never apply to them. Another example, is the YouTube video poster Drachinifels. He is a naval histographer, and has a lar…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 05:07 PM
70

Feminist double speak. They do it all the time. I was going to say they have brass balls for doing it. They have the female equivalent, I suppose.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 08:51 AM
19

None of the above.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:42 AM
9

I donated a year or two ago; then I learned how they allow feminist academics to "edit" MRA pages. When they asked for a donation recently, I pointed this out and refused. They tried twice - to no avail.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:41 AM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4vGM9gzYyU&t=3145s Doubly illustrated by this video.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 06:00 PM
4

I didn't know such female MPs existed. I thought they were either feminist ideologues or passive fellow travellers. I just wish she were my MP.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 06:22 PM
1

Fine with females, I suspect.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 11:06 AM
3

Love it!
/r/MensRights16/05/20 03:23 PM
6

I read somewhere that in Canada the state always appeals sex-offence acquittals - are they going to do in this case?
/r/MensRights16/05/20 08:15 AM
4

Are any male voters supporting this woman?
/r/MensRights16/05/20 05:22 AM
1

It would be a start.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 05:14 AM
5

Thanks for that. It is going to come in useful.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 04:53 PM
0

One reason: Because men still vote for politicians that undermine them.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 05:25 AM
12

Write back to him and tell him he's lost your vote.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 01:09 PM
2

Who got the samples and how did they get them?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 11:10 AM
4

As Paul Elam has said: "There are no victims; only volunteers."
/r/MensRights08/05/20 08:51 AM
1

I did support them, once! Never again.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 07:51 AM
3

Blatant greed by this feminist politician. What are her male colleagues doing about it? Can't they see that as long as these women are allowed to take, take, take, they will continue doing it?
/r/MensRights07/05/20 01:18 PM
17

"survivors…" Here we go again. S/b; "accusers..."
/r/MensRights07/05/20 10:18 AM
3

Good point!
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:39 PM
3

The answer, of course, is that feminists would be screaming if they did so.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:27 PM
4

Well, surely, they should have had the wit and, indeed, guts to change the title? I suspect they feared annoying the feminist lobby if they did so.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:23 PM
6

I can't see why nobody has suggested a return to single-sex colleges as a solution to this problem.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 03:48 PM
99

But why should there be any statutory guidance? Surely, the only guidance should be: if anyone commits domestic violence, they should be punished for it.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 12:44 PM
13

So, why don't they use the most common (by far) example? I strongly suspect there are very few female 15 yo on the streets.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:49 AM
2

The most recent is a year old? Pity it isn't more active.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:07 PM
10

It's common in all walks of life, I'm afraid. One area in which I've particularly noticed it is Youtube videos. In two areas that particularly interest me: classical music and ocean cruising, any video that has a young woman in a low-cut dress, or bikini in the thumbnail, gets a rocketing number of views.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 03:31 PM
1

What privileges?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:33 PM
1

I blame Korean men for letting them get away with this.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 08:57 AM
13

That must have come as a shock. Normally, every judgement goes in their favour.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:26 AM
340

I have great contempt for the male politicians, civil servants, and others who allow the feminists to manipulate the system in this way.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 03:43 PM
3

I would guess that that refers to everything in the western world, apart from feminism, and the small group of people often referred to as "men's rights supporters".
/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:13 PM
13

More feminist/lefty lies, I wonder?
/r/MensRights02/05/20 05:09 AM
2

I sincerely hope it gets him a bit of sex.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 09:08 AM
20

Let's hope this idea spreads.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 09:07 AM
2

But they are worse than both the others.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 08:28 AM
2

But will they? I'm not sure that they're any better than Labour these days.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:09 AM
10

Because fewer men will be robbed.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:07 PM
13

Because fewer men will be robbed.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:06 PM
2

Legal discrimination under a so-called Conservative government too. Don't vote for them.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:05 PM
6

Agreed.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 03:03 PM
2

So you were right! Congratulations.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 07:36 AM
11

Still, a minor defeat for them, which is something.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 02:07 PM
47

"But they should not necessarily be treated equally in situations where it is of no advantage to them."
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:08 PM
4

Why does "women's health" get far more funding than men's, then?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:47 AM
1

It is the male politicians who let them do it that I have the greatest contempt for.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 07:29 AM
2

That is what every non-Canadian man should be thinking. And the ones already there should seriously think about leaving.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:36 AM
1

The danger, if your latter point becomes widespread, with the number of wealthy single men increasing enormously, is a "bachelor tax".
/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:34 AM
6

? Feminism is still doing very well, especially amongst politicians.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:01 PM
1

Declan Mansfield 18 April 2020 9:00 AM After #MeToo : Feminism, Patriarchy, Toxic Masculinity and Sundry Cultural Delights Gerard Casey Imprint Academic, pp.250, $47.09 One of life’s perennial questions is what would the world look like if it was ruled by women. It’s an idle question. The world has always been ruled by both men and women because women sexually select the traits they admire in their male partners. Men as they exist today, after thousands of years of evolution, are – for good or i…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:59 AM
2

They didn't get the result they hoped for - they have saved a large number of men.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 06:50 AM
3

Basically, his argument is that equality was achieved a long time ago, and "feminism" is about getting more rights and privileges forwomen.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:28 AM
17

"mental health", child. Excuses are always trotted out.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 08:45 AM
7

"The proportion of reported rapes prosecuted in England and Wales is currently at a shocking 1.4 per cent..." Correction: "The proportion of ALLEGED rapes..." Correction: "This means rape has been decriminalised..." No, it doesn't. It means that in most cases of alleged rape, there is no evidence, despite hard work by the police, that a rape has taken place.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 06:19 PM
5

Great news! I just hope some judge in the UK will do the same.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:56 PM
11

Correct. In Spain, a woman can have a man jailed without evidence, the reverse cannot happen. Also, of course, there are also pension age differences, always in women's favour.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 11:27 AM
2

And who is responsible? Men; especially those who think they are never going to pay it.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:08 PM
21

What about repealing laws that force men males to do military service and wait for extra years to get their pensions? This man is a degenerate clown. What about the discrimination against men and boys in the family courts, and courts in general?l
/r/MensRights29/02/20 11:49 AM
2

Especially the bit abut: "Going through a handbag without permission..."
/r/MensRights19/02/20 10:28 PM
2

The guide about non-molestation orders is also interesting.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 10:19 PM
2

Let's hope that will be the case. At least, with the conservatives we have a chance. If labour were in, they would be rushing through all manner of laws because of this case alone. They were already planning a women's ministry and a law against misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:30 AM
2

I agree. But I'm not hopeful. This government, after all, is bringing in a domestic abuse bill which, from the way I am reading it, will mean males will not be able to prevent their female partners (that's the way it will be) from doing whatever they want with their savings and assets without facing criminal charges.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:15 AM
12

All good points. The difference in the ways media treated this woman's case, and the way it has historically treated similar male cases, is appalling.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:43 AM
1

I am not in favour of it. Because "gender neutral" does not mean it will be applied in a gender neutral way. Once a restraining order is applied for, the party it will be applied against (which, of course, is almost inevitably the male), will have to keep clear of his home and his children. 3.He (and it will mostly be HE), will have very limited means of clearing himself of allegations. and "economic abuse" is defined in such a way as to make it next to impossible for a man to control the expend…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:11 PM
10

Well, it was feminist pressure that insisted the CPS charge alleged domestic abusers even if their supposed victims didn't want it to happen. They thought, of course, only males would be charged. Hoist with their own petard.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 10:57 AM
3

By a male too Ah, I see, a father of three daughters.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:48 AM
3

Prince Harry?
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:44 AM
3

You could have recorded it on your phone.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:03 AM
2

Exactly. They always have an easy way out.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 09:23 AM
6

Wonderful woman.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:24 PM
6

And the same thing has happened to this day: in the UK armed forces, women make up about 17% of personnel, I think I read, but less than 2% of casualties. The women, of course, get the same pay rates and pensions.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 01:43 PM
1

They are notorious for it.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 10:15 AM
5

Signed.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 05:40 AM
84

Men in Finland need to wake up.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:07 PM
2

You're right. I don't think it has been too bad in the UK, after the initial wave of hysteria, when the police tended to arrest male victims - simply because it was the easy way out. Also, as regards female behaviour, I wonder whether the appearance of "confident" women in movies has subconsciously affected this.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:32 AM
3

Why was such nonsense allowed?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 06:12 PM
5

"The Global Gender Gap Index is an index designed to measure gender equality..." Not really. It seems to be designed to measure female superiority.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 02:16 PM
9

Says it all, really. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Gender_Gap_Report Why are female advantages over males not being taken into account? Were there no males present to insist that that be the case?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:58 PM
8

He did indeed phrase the issue very well, the issue, that is, as already phrased by the article you have linked to. That government article takes great care not to hint, even, at sexual, and indeed, domestic violence committed against males by females; indeed, it goes out of its way to try to claim that males only suffer sexual and physical abuse by other males. One can, of course, understand Jones not wanting to go against The Guardian's constant attempts to claim that males are only ever victi…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 08:48 PM
13

The lefty Jones is referring to rape of males by males. In this long Guardian article, he takes great care not even to hint at rape of males by females. He is a fraud.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 07:08 PM
3

Not less for us, simply more privileges - and special treatment for them. Which you will become aware of if you end up in a family court, a divorce court, or...err...a law court. Dream on.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:05 AM
2

Shit, you hit the nail on its head. This move, if agreed, will be just the start of the process. It's happened before. Men, and male lawmakers need to learn how to say: "No!"
/r/MensRights21/01/20 06:19 AM
4

Grevio - the body responsible for "monitoring" the convention has three male members and twelve female ones. Sex equality?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 12:27 AM
7

Who is their useless head of government?
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:48 PM
2

Can males file fil for rape by females?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 06:50 PM
2

When somebody is reduced to insults, as he/she is, you know there's something wrong with them, and their argument.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:14 PM
0

It HAS been provided - many times. Look it up.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:03 PM
-2

b/s
/r/MensRights07/01/20 04:45 PM
7

There are so many things wrong with your post (DNA was taken; physical assessment WAS performed, etc, etc) that I don't have time to answer it. And, as for linking to The Guardian, well, now I KNOW you have no interest in the truth.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:48 PM
9

Only because he was raped by a man.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:58 PM
6

Corbyn, if elected, was also going to create a "Ministry for Women" and a law against misogyny. He was also going to borrow 58 billion to compensate women who had lost their pension privileges.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 04:20 PM
0

Out of curiosity, does anyone know how many female US military personnel have been killed in combat?
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:17 PM
6

The Empathy Gap - Collins.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 12:44 AM
7

She's a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 08:08 AM
2

No, that is not correct. She is Harriet Wistriche's partner - another feminist lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 11:23 PM
41

They have just asked me for a donation. I said it had come to my notice that they allow feminists to edit and sabotage MRA pages. So, sorry, but I cannot help.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:51 PM
2

Indeed. This is what feminism looks like.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:36 AM
3

A great, small, country, that gets so many things right!
/r/MensRights01/01/20 01:18 AM
3

A medal? Well done, Sir!
/r/MensRights01/01/20 01:12 AM
3

Sorry.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 06:03 PM
5

Only a fraction of what a woman would have got.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 04:05 PM
2

This appears to explain the whole story:https://falsevictims.com/fictim/433/freya-heath?fbclid=IwAR1FJ4mdu6laShG01tfGweo_vCLixMl0BLMOw1LswYmhBxG9WW0RB0rdEtg
/r/MensRights30/12/19 05:14 PM
0

This piece seehttps://falsevictims.com/fictim/433/freya-heath?fbclid=IwAR1FJ4mdu6laShG01tfGweo_vCLixMl0BLMOw1LswYmhBxG9WW0RB0rdEtgms to explain the story fully:
/r/MensRights30/12/19 05:12 PM
3

"It started many moons ago to allow women the same rights and privileges as men...." Whilst taking very great care not to ask that they get the same responsibilities as men.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:55 PM
5

I have just responded thus: "But women have, very often, got their role assigned, and had to subordinate themselves under the will of men..." And men, in return, had responsibilities that women did not have. Such as conscription, and being responsible for their wives expenditure and debts. "Rape in marriage was forbidden in 1997..." Was rape of husbands by wives forbidden in marriage in 1997? In my country it wasn't. The problem when talking about "oppression of women" is that their privileges, …
/r/MensRights29/12/19 10:38 AM
4

Another useful idiot. Hope you get laid, mate.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 07:49 PM
7

Exactly. Any man who wants to risk his life helping women and girls, needs to ask himself how many feminists would risk their lives to help men and boys.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 07:48 PM
7

Indeed. It'll get worse.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 06:11 PM
14

And this:https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/dec/27/everybody-is-talking-about-it-womens-rights-to-take-centre-stage-in-2020 To which I would respond: And what about women's responsibilities?" And, err, men's rights, with men in many countries having later pension ages, having to do military service, getting second class health care, and so on, and so on.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 10:22 AM
17

Is there no appeal process in the US?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 06:09 PM
3

An example of a (weak) woman not being able to seriously harm a man. If she uses a weapon when he's asleep the argument is b/s.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:00 PM
3

And in The Cold War, the British government built shelters for politicians and had secret plans to shoot any private citizen that did not do as they were told.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:55 PM
2

And I have the greatest contempt for the males (as it surely was) who allowed feminists to pull that trick.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:17 PM
12

Happy to. But didn't someone say this org hasn't changed anything?
/r/MensRights22/12/19 08:07 PM
6

Above all, do not have children with a Japanese woman.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:56 PM
6

There'd soon be in-breeding effects.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 07:06 PM
2

I agree. If I am certain the woman is a feminist. Unfortunately, in most cases, you wouldn't know, and there are a lot of women worth helping out there.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 07:48 PM
5

I agree. But you women need to keep your hands to yourselves as well!
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:04 PM
2

Indeed, like that woman who grabbed Owen Shroyer's crotch, but got off lightly, I believe.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:03 PM
8

Swinson is out too. Her major law would have been the misogyny one.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:37 AM
14

They have it in their heads that vast numbers of sexual assaults are being committed - by men on women, of course. They have no evidence for this - if they did, they could pass it to prosecutors. But they don't need evidence, because they FEEL it.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:08 PM
58

The fact that this has happened in Australia is significant. That country is under almost total feminist control, which you can see by male politicians fearing to be present.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:01 PM
11

I've emailed them.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 11:00 AM
1

Not if they're gay, perhaps.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:30 AM
7

I don't know, but it isn't Canada.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:18 PM
7

The judge will release her with an apology for wasting her time.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:25 PM
10

It's becoming as bad in the UK. Have you seen the things the Labour Party is going to do for women if it gets into power? Few people have noticed.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 06:50 PM
4

Leave Michigan.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:24 PM
5

My view is that it's more like branding a cow or coloring the coat of a sheep. It's saying: "you belong to us". Or, "you belong to our group".
/r/MensRights01/12/19 08:08 PM
7

Why worry that girls, especially, claim you're gay? Tell them to fuck off, and who cares what they say or think?
/r/MensRights01/12/19 08:33 AM
199

The NHS spends EIGHT times as much on the average female patient as the average male patient.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 02:30 PM
20

Women falsely accuse more often than men, and that is a fact.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 11:03 AM
3

Somebody said it isn't going to happen. The news was wrong.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 06:16 PM
2

Mine didn't work? Sorry.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:56 PM
3

Obviously, Sweden isn't all bad.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:03 AM
7

Good point. We may have cheered too soon.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:45 PM
9

The answer is, in fact, a simple one. Most accusers are women.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:35 AM
11

He disclosed that the US spies on everybody, and they want to charge him with spying on them!
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:06 AM
13

Obscene. And I have the greatest contempt for male politicians who allow it, and the voters who vote for them, too!
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:59 AM
19

Me too. I'm an MRA who loves cats. I do wish people would drop stereotypes.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 05:47 PM
5

Nope. But the Conservatives (degenerates that they are) do include a couple of politicians most of us can respect (Davies; Raab). Otherwise, only vote for Mike Buchanan's J4MB. Or, abstain.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:58 PM
82

If they are, then, surely, they need preferential medical, social, and legal treatment.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:37 PM
24

utter fanatics, indeed, and male voters too gullible and stupid to see what's going on.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 03:46 PM
3

Feminists do, of course.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:38 PM
1

I would also ask why, when the minister is implying many males are victims of other males in domestic abuse, she makes no reference at all to female victims of other females in domestic abuse, when it is well known that female partnerships are the most violent of all partnerships.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:24 PM
2

Which is NOT "overwhelming" in my view. "Overwhelming" in my view, would be something like ten to one.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:08 PM
1

On reflection, I agree. However, from the UKSE's last response, it would, surely, have been their duty to ask the minister if she was indeed implying that a larger proportion of victims are female than the statistics show, and, if that was the case, on what evidence she was basing her assertion.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:00 PM
1

We need to play them at their own game.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 02:48 PM
5

UP vote. Multiple times.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 01:43 PM
2

Agreed. And it isn't helped by the fact that you get desperate males and incels lining up to say: "She can rape me anyday!"
/r/MensRights11/11/19 10:21 AM
7

Well done, MBC!
/r/MensRights11/11/19 09:58 AM
4

Feminists in the idiot Blair's government were allowed to pull that fast one - you do wonder at the gullibility of male politicians (males?) in letting them get away with it. More likely, it was supineness. Several attempts have been made to have the law changed and envelopement included in rape, but male legislators live in fear of feminist reactions and so they won't do it. Government replies often point out that serious sexual assaults whether committed by males or females carry the same sent…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 08:29 AM
6

I can't find it right now, but I believe it does say that "he" refers to both sexes unless otherwise made clear in the text.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 08:11 AM
8

Exactly. Once again, it will be double standards all the way, and very easily done.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:40 PM
16

Any government worth its salt would have set up an enquiry into these allegations and taken appropriate steps to help boys if necessary. The UK government did nothing. Feminists appear to be running UK education.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:20 PM
11

Can a German contributor tell us if women-only clubs get charity status? (Incidentally, I did not know Germany had so many men-only clubs. One good reason for moving there!)
/r/MensRights10/11/19 03:31 PM
3

Men who marry under this system have only themselves to blame. As Paul Elam said: "There re no victims, only volunteers."
/r/MensRights08/11/19 07:44 PM
4

She has thirty-thousand followers, or, to put it another way, thirty thousand volunteers for an accusation of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:02 PM
9

I've been buying their brand ever since the Gillette incident.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:16 PM
4

And the woman has no money apparently, which means no punishment at all in reality.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:08 PM
11

The answer, mate, is that he isn't as desperate as you!
/r/MensRights03/11/19 04:51 PM
16

I thought they wanted sex equality.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 11:52 AM
8

They have just sent me a request for a financial contribution. (I have contributed before.) I simply deleted it. Never again.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:27 AM
10

I have money, lady. And I'm keeping it.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 02:10 PM
1

And you were right. Feminists want to cherry pick; they want buffet sex equality.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 10:13 AM
3

Done.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 07:47 PM
2

I remember your case. What is the situation now?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 09:09 AM
4

Blame male politicians for allowing this to happen.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 09:06 AM
14

In days gone by, and assuming the wife looked after the house and kids, it allowed the man to concentrate on his job and his career, often to the benefit of both of them. Today, (and it depends on the wife, of course) it may save a little money (through tax allowances, and the "two can live as cheaply as one" idea), but (through pandering male politicians, essentially) everything has become tilted towards the wife and the state. Thus, in the event of a breakup, the wife and the state will win. T…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:00 AM
3

As Paul Elam said: "There are no victims; only volunteers."
/r/MensRights27/10/19 06:34 AM
24

No problem so long as women who touch me without permission also pay me £250 a time.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:22 AM
0

Logically, yes. But logic is unknown to feminists.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:15 PM
5

The most dangerous country for men is Spain.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:13 PM
5

To which I would add: there would be nothing stopping you getting circumcised as an adult if you wish, but any male who regrets it no longer has the power to turn back the clock. Hence, it should only be done with a male's consent.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 10:16 AM
15

How about the right not to be raped by female persons? In my country, men don't have that right
/r/MensRights22/10/19 05:55 AM
3

Will they get lighter sentences?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:42 PM
2

What you say about the Morrison government gives me hope for Australia.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 10:07 AM
5

They also have reasonable alimony laws, I believe.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:31 AM
3

To do her plastic surgery, perhaps?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:47 PM
6

"Who would defend them....?" The vast majority of males would! The white knights and manginas.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:52 AM
3

That's the standard UK definition, brought in by the feminists in the last Labour government.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 12:14 PM
25

More likely, they've learned from the experience of other men, that, thanks to lawmakers having favoured wives for three decades, it is very likely the route to ruination. Everything is in the wife's favour: even if it is she who ended the marriage - her lifestyle must not suffer, and it is she who gets preferential housing.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 03:14 PM
1

He annoyed me as soon as he said: "the Me Too movement is important!" I would only agree with this statement if he had also said: "the Mentoo movement is important!"
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:35 PM
3

Agreed. But what they actually do is more important. I am a customer of Lloyds and recently asked them for a service. This they did, and then they sent me a survey about how well they had done. I gave mostly very positive answers, and the last page called for "comments". I said none about the service but quoted this new policy instead. I said "if it turns out that this is going to be used against male customers only, our forty year association is coming to an end."
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:47 PM
3

I'm right behind all of these. Do not vote for any politician that supports any of them.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 07:39 AM
1

In North Korea, they do not have to worry about the women's vote.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:25 AM
4

Good to read the last paragraph. Feminists too long, have been playing their puppets like flutes.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:22 PM
119

Like a true feminist, she is probably numerically illiterate. She FEELS there is no need for shelters for men; therefore, it must be so.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:24 AM
13

What I suspected, I'm afraid. Just as men used to kill other men in the deep south simply on a woman's word, and without seeking any evidence.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 10:28 AM
1

I thought there would be the odd case.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:46 AM
3

Women love what men can do for them. Men love women in that they are prepared to sacrifice their lives for them, either as hostages or by giving them priority in the lifeboats of a sinking ship. Have you ever heard women doing that for men? I suspect there may be the odd case, but, if there is, I haven't heard of it.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 05:26 PM
8

I thought this was obvious.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:19 PM
1

You heard correctly!
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:16 PM
1

The same thing could be said in reverse by men. The difference is, that men can create and maintain the world they live in, but women cannot.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 04:09 PM
4

The leaders of both the Conservative and the Labour parties have said they are feminists. So, come on, both of you, do what you're told and hand over power to Lucas. Lol!
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:38 AM
3

Sentence? Please don't do it again!
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:55 PM
5

Correct answer. They allowed it to appeal to women voters, thinking they, themselves, will never be a victim.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:03 AM
3

Is there no appeal?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:05 AM
4

Not from me.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:04 AM
7

We've seen this sort of thing in other ways in the UK. When will lawmakers ever realise that is if they keep giving in, these sort of people will keep coming back for more?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:15 AM
8

Exactly. No male voter should vote for a party that thinks for a sex that is not his. Simply as that. Any male who does, is a turkey voting for Christmas.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:49 PM
9

Just shows what brainwashed morons most people are.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:27 PM
5

So they can't compete with male ones? Guessed that already.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:51 PM
19

Nope. It's a men's rights issue. A man's (or male child's) body is his choice. Nobody - nobody - should be able to take that away from him without his express permission.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:21 AM
3

Air Canada if off my list of carriers.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 06:15 AM
-1

maybe there is. So, I'll remove it.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 05:06 PM
1

Wow! That's makes four influential men with testicles, alongside Philip Davies MP, and Leyonjhlem and Latham in Australia. Can anyone name any more? Especially in US?
/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:50 PM
-18

Exactly. As I understand it, boys voted to let girls join their outfit. Just another example of male stupidity, I'm afraid. Now, and inevitably, the girls are dictating to the boys, What idiots!
/r/MensRights04/08/19 06:42 AM
18

Well, it saved me money by switching, so, I guess, he's right.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 01:57 PM
4

They should be punished severely because they ruin innocent men's lives. The is the PRIMARY reason they should be punished,
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:55 AM
22

She won because she was paid. By an idiot boss, in my opinion, who put his company's profits at risk to spread the feminist message.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:54 PM
3

However, No 10 disagreed with him. So, I will not vote for them.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 07:30 AM
140

Sooner or later, somebody was going to go too far in pandering to women's/feminist's interests. I hope this serves as a warning to others.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 07:26 AM
9

Gynocenterism.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 07:20 AM
7

Please ask them to repay the overpayment.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:06 AM
10

Please now make them take a cut.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 08:00 PM
6

It was!
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:00 PM
23

I agree. I don't support Trump in most other ways, but I applaud and support him in this.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:56 PM
6

And there are still many more places where women are given preferential treatment to men: such as the family courts, the divorce courts, and. well, the law courts. (And, while I am on the subject, why should an inferior soccer team that produces a fraction of the revenue another team produces, be paid anywhere near the same?) You, whoever you are, are obviously an idiot. Or, a feminist and a liar, which, in my experience, is the same!
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:22 PM
7

WHO has taken an $8 billion write-down? Sorry, I have never heard of that company.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 12:35 PM
3

Something for men? Makes a change.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:15 AM
6

Can you provide a link?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 06:56 AM
28

Bingo!
/r/MensRights25/07/19 06:23 PM
5

He's a wonder. And probably our only hope. The other clowns are surrender monkeys.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 04:24 PM
0

A unicorn!
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:39 AM
2

And people vote for this!
/r/MensRights25/07/19 08:46 AM
-6

Not quite accurate, though. "...from feminist idiocy."
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:24 PM
3

A work of art by somebody.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 02:33 PM
1

Got him some publicity, I suppose.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:23 AM
7

Makes a change. Or, maybe, I need new glasses.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:44 AM
9

Garbage. These fools are in total awe of feminists and women's movements. Do not vote for either the Labour or Conservative parties.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 05:58 AM
9

That's a bingo!
/r/MensRights23/07/19 06:57 PM
1

They are a big deal for the poor devils on the end of them.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 03:56 PM
7

I at present receive a free television licence because of my age. Next year, this is due to change. When the BBC sends me a demand for a licence fee, they will get a tart letter from me. I'll post it here in these pages.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 03:53 PM
1

You can read numerous accounts in these pages of men who have been accused of sex offences and have lost their jobs and their educations because of it, and not got those things back when the accuser was found to be lying.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:30 AM
9

Men are regularly "strip searched" simply on an allegation of rape from a woman. What's the betting that weak and cowardly political white knights will support these demands, thinking they themselves will not be affected.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:10 AM
6

Male lawmakers are responsible for this state of affairs by having constantly given in over at least three decades. The changes they have made (here in the UK certainly), have only ever been in favour of the wife.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 05:21 AM
4

It doesn't matter whether they arrested and charged, or not. They were put under serious stress for probably many months. And, if the news had got out, they would have suffered from the effects of the investigation probably for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 05:19 AM
1

Isn't the page blank?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 05:25 PM
13

At least the males took it all the way to court, whereas just a few years ago they would have been prevented from doing so. The case may make females more careful how they treat male colleagues in future.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 05:24 PM
17

They are notorious for twisting everything their way.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 03:40 PM
18

Female nipples are not included.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 03:21 PM
1

It is. But feminists, like the minister, are being allowed to bend the perception that women should be the main beneficiaries, and not a single male MP will stop them doing it.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 07:21 PM
12

They have more rights than men. But now, after pandering by male lawmakers, they want even more rights than they have now.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:44 PM
7

I'm bi-sexual. So, fuck off!
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:43 PM
1

Signed.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:08 PM
1

Indeed. Choose who you vote for very carefully. only vote for politicians that give men and boys consideration. Tactically vote against any politician who does not.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 10:35 AM
1

Correct thinking! 7% of voters do constitute a menace and a danger to larger, passive, majorities.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:49 AM
0

Not really. She got a lot of publicity from a very stupid media!
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:21 AM
3

Unless it goes wrong, which, for a male, can result in a very premature death!
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:58 PM
2

The problem is that lawmakers are in awe to them!
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:43 PM
5

I believe the WHO (?) or some such other international body, has recently named it as a major concern, against feminist objections. A defeat for them there.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 05:51 PM
3

I have no idea. At my age, it is relatively unimportant. My sole concern is for guys like you. There is just a hint that things are finally changing: Philip Davies - the like of which did not exist until a year or two ago; Sargon; and a few other - and increasing - anti-feminists. Labour and Conservative governments will kiss feminist asses so long a they think it will get/keep them in power. Once the tide changes in a big way, they will change too.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 04:48 PM
5

Great if it works for you. But always remember that if anything goes wrong you will be the loser. Also, that you are (depending on your country, of course,) just one phone call from a prison cell.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:57 PM
4

Fix the laws? When do you think that is going to happen?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:55 PM
7

Governments have an obligation to look after the interests of all of their citizens, and the UK government (essentially the Labour and Conservative parties (!) have not done that for years. They allow feminist ideologues and fifth-columnists in their midst to continually introduce laws that benefit women and girls. And this will go on until male voters stop voting for them and indeed tactically where possible vote against them. Indeed, since our own governments have effectively declared war on u…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:37 PM
5

Some of men's worst enemies are other men.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:25 PM
6

I certainly haven't bought any of their products since.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:04 AM
4

Signed.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:12 AM
2

At least they didn't name the man. Something, I suppose.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:11 PM
10

Indeed. This is the sort of sentence that should be handed out on a regular basis to try to reduce this sort of offence. It is happening far too often because women think the law will go lightly on them. I just wish our own cucked judges in the UK would do the same. Males should not only be subject to the law but they should be protected by it, like women.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:20 AM
13

I agree. But my question would be how would they treat a man?
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:42 PM
1

Have a look at j4mb's manifesto.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:31 PM
6

Exactly. Men should put themselves first, middle, and last.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:44 AM
2

If you want to accept you are a second class citizen, then that is up to you (whilst also, of course, your female contemporaries are getting on with their careers and earing money). Being an all time loser is not for me.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 07:22 PM
1

If you do, you will serve. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 07:16 PM
10

Women should have more for less. That's equality.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:32 PM
2

But they don't. They give in and serve. Little wonder that politicians just ignore them.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:56 PM
1

This happens time and time again, and you do wonder at the intelligence, stupidity, and weakness of men when they let feminists make such fools of them.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:03 PM
1

They should renounce their citizenship and move to a country where the sexes are treated equally. Such as Holland.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:23 PM
5

The worst part is a "conservative" government has let them do it.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 07:24 AM
3

"Compared with those that stay single..." That's because their wives won't let them!"
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:59 PM
2

"Modern feminism which is nothing more than a twisted demented version of traditional feminism views women constantly as the victim and the man as the oppressor." Only, of course, so as to get lawmakers and naïve males to give them everything they ant.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:48 PM
1

It is indeed. Especially as few men hold actual power. In fact, women have more voting power than men. Feminism, is, of nothing to do with equality. It is about getting everything for women.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:46 PM
5

The fall off in marriages seen in India (and, indeed, many other advanced countries) shows that males are more and more refusing to play a game they can't win. The lawmakers who brought about this state of affairs are entirely responsible and it will be women who lose out most if this continues.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:42 PM
12

Fair enough. Go underground.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:36 PM
17

It was the same in the UK. The women I worked with got the same pay as myself but their state pensions 5 years earlier.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 11:51 AM
4

The male idiot politicians responsible for this state of affairs in your country and mine - and the thugs who administer it - think it isn't going to happen to them. That is why they are so cavalier with men's lives and reputations.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 07:39 PM
6

The time will come when male politicians will start calling for it to be abolished.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 05:27 PM
10

It shows how brainwashed the media is. Incredible.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 03:39 PM
2

Point him to his mother.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:48 PM
2

The bond was built on a lie. Therefore, in my view, it was negated.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:21 PM
4

It doesn't matter whether or not he provides any love or support to the child. The mother, alone, after lying, is, responsible for that. if he turns around and walks away, there should be no blame on him whatsoever.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:12 PM
1

He should blame his mother.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:45 PM
3

He should blame his mother, only!
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:44 PM
1

In what way is being a parent not a burden? It certainly isn't in the financial sense. Far from it. Especially as it is invariably the mother who gets the emotional benefits.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:40 PM
0

He's neither. The only person the kid has to blame is his mother - FOR EVERYTHYING! Stop blaming men for thiNgs they have no responsibility for!
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:30 PM
0

The kid has ONLY his mother to blame. NOBODY ELSE.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:29 PM
2

B/S. He is just aware that women ALWAYS have the law on their side.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:27 PM
0

They are both at fault. Both are parasites.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:12 PM
3

B/S! The man was lied to, therefore he is a victim. He no longer owes anything to this boy who is, when you come to look at it realistically, a parasite. He owes nothing to this child. The responsibility is entirely the mother's.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:49 PM
5

But he was not aware of this fact. The woman who lied to him should be expected to take full - an d financial - responsibility. He owes these lying parasites nothing.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:38 PM
1

What benefits did he have for that period, exactly? A couple of parasites living off his back?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:33 PM
0

B/S. Would you say a woman (or father) who takes a wrong child out of hospital owes that child a life?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:26 PM
5

B/S. He was Lied to. He was robbed. Would people say the same about a woman in the same circumstance?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:17 PM
2

I'm not. Male politicians - who have power I do not possess, unfortunately, are.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:06 PM
2

It isn't going to happen. Feminists won't allow it.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:55 PM
2

Exactly. That is why I would oppose it.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:52 AM
4

I think Carla Bowman's novel The End of Men does that.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 03:02 PM
13

They are probably actually feminists.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 12:28 PM
4

Good work! Sounds like the original piece came from a feminist academic. It's the sort of corrupt garbage they churn out.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 11:40 AM
1

This case shows how "the patriarchy" has not preferenced males but victimised them in return for the vote and a pat on the back from female voters which they crave. Lesson: Do not reside in South Carolina and, if you do, move right now!
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:48 AM
-2

I have to disagree. I do! Especially when I see what what Indian men and boys have to put up with.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:58 PM
7

"Charity Rape Crisis said false allegations of rape, sexual abuse and other sexual offences were rare but had "disproportionate media focus on them". "The subsequent widespread myth that they are common contributes to an environment in which it's very difficult for victims and survivors to talk about what's happened to them and seek the support and justice they want, need and deserve," said Katie Russell, national spokesperson for Rape Crisis England and Wales. She added: "Giving these suspects …
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:51 PM
5

I wait for the UK (and Canada!) to follow.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:43 PM
4

"Or when you look at the famous exlamation of (almost certainly gay) King Frederick the Great of Prussia that "the three arch whores of Europe are conspiring against me", And they still couldn't beat him!
/r/MensRights30/06/19 12:43 PM
14

That's the way to do it! Everybody, please follow suit!
/r/MensRights30/06/19 12:34 PM
3

And nobody will, until we stop voting for politicians who do not take our interests into account.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 08:01 AM
19

"unequal pay, discriminatory pension rights), industrial (unequal work opportunities... Now 'I've heard all! The women I worked with got the same rate of pay as myself, plus their state pensions FIVE years earlier!
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:57 PM
3

Corbyn has said the next Labour government will run the country "for women".
/r/MensRights29/06/19 02:29 PM
4

The problem is you (or they) can never know if it will change. And, if it does, you will almost certainly be finished.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:55 AM
4

From a "conservative" government too! Absolutely appalling. The male sounds like a naïve fool.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 04:50 AM
6

We are trying to discourage telling the truth?
/r/MensRights29/06/19 04:31 AM
2

Sums it up perfectly. Weak and cowardly male politicians pandering to the women's movements let feminists kill it off for all but the most stupid of men.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 04:30 AM
2

Move out of that state immediately!
/r/MensRights28/06/19 07:02 AM
2

I can only speak for Conservatives in the UK. And re-iterate what a leading MRA has said on television (I can't remember his name, but he was an American and somewhat portly). "The only thing that politicians really care about is office". Thus, they do tend to swim with the tide. Thus, in the UK, you have Gawk pandering to the feminist vote. Also, May. And the other leaders who claim to be feminists. Of course, these are politicians, and so you can't trust them further than you can throw a milki…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 10:24 AM
3

And however much money politicians give them, they will always call for more. When will those weak fools realise that pandering to feminism only leads to more demands?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:38 AM
3

This has been pointed out by somebody (a female) in the system. So, the UK government will be aware of it. And what is the (Conservative) UK government doing about it?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:19 PM
3

How much do I directly spend on women? 0. How much do I spend on women via my taxes? 75%!
/r/MensRights24/06/19 10:42 AM
2

No. I'm not. Just try it.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:40 AM
37

I thought she said she was "better than men". It doesn't appear so!
/r/MensRights23/06/19 06:46 PM
15

The trouble is an awful lot of male politicians and other men will let them get away with it.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 12:19 PM
3

I sent him a donation some time ago. But he needs to thank supporters and not simply ignore them.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:52 AM
2

Must have a new movie coming up.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:08 PM
4

And this is the f"""""" Conservative Party, who have turned out to be just as gynocentric as the Labour Party.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:55 PM
3

I see. I thought I saw Valencia.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 04:21 PM
6

Spain! Men should either not have anything to do with women, or move abroad. You are the real victims in that country.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 04:08 PM
2

Yes. But what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:21 PM
41

Nobody that I know. But, even if somebody does, the message is: "Do not tell us what to wear!"
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:59 PM
6

The man was a fool. But what's new?
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:29 PM
29

And it'll be even worse when sex dolls are in mass production.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 09:51 AM
9

"The accused was forced to provide intimate samples..." These would be compared with samples taken from the accuser, yet many women refuse to be examined or have samples taken. Why don't the police wait until they have something from the woman to compare the samples to before subjecting men to this indignity?
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:04 PM
20

Well done, Sir! Those idiots are wide open to counter-attack.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:41 AM
2

What is Swiss law on divorce, alimony, and rape? Do men who are accused of sexual offences get anonymity?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:32 PM
1

It's too late then. The husband is on his way to court. I would be interested to learn what penalties apply to a wife who forces sex on an non-consenting husband. My guess is that no offence exists.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:55 PM
6

You missed the sign which says "No morons allowed!"
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:28 PM
1

It was in these pages some time ago. And it gets worse. A husband has no right of access to his wife's earnings and money, but he cannot stop her spending his. That, again, would be abuse. "Financial abuse". I really do wonder how low Australian men want to grovel.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:19 PM
3

When will your gutless invertebrate politicians realise that the more you give them the more they will demand.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:17 PM
42

Give the women equality. Just make certain they get it.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:14 PM
1

For the man only in Australia. Those cucks have made it so that a man has no right of sex with his wife but he, himself, cannot stop her having sex with him. That would come under "abuse" as "withholding affection".
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:06 PM
1

Not any more. In the UK at least. Forced sex in marriage is rape - for the male at least.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:57 PM
40

Would a woman face the same charges? Don't bother to answer.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:22 AM
2

Because they can get most male politicians to pander to their wishes, anyway. Most are white knights or total cucks, who already obey one female overlord - their wives. Notice how quickly laws are changed when women want them changed.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:11 AM
3

Canadian male politicians are complete degenerates.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:20 AM
4

But when people have tried to correct the pages on women's rights, somebody has removed the edits.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:18 AM
11

Feminist academics and others had an "alter-a-thon" or something and sabotaged pages on male issues such as the one on men's rights movements. Compare that page with the one on feminism and you'll see a big difference.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:17 AM
23

If somebody is accused of murder, there has to be a body. If somebody is accused of theft, there has to be something missing. If somebody is accused of assault, there need be absolutely nothing at all.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:14 AM
9

It should all have gone to men.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:11 AM
10

Good. And neutrally defined, as well.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:24 PM
1

Blame the courts, blame men... Never blame women with children for breaking the law.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 05:37 PM
1

The lengths some men will go to get pussy!
/r/MensRights16/06/19 08:28 PM
1

Thanks for that, but on reflection I don't think it was what I was thinking of. The figure of 6% sticks in my mind as being the body requiring that to be the extent that women are better off than men before it will consider equality has been achieved. There was, I seem to remember, a vertical bar chart illustrating the arguments. I think it was probably at least a year ago.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:43 PM
1

Yes, I think that was it. Thanks. Incidentally, how did you find it? I've looked at pages and pages but have found nothing.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:06 AM
2

Men (mainly male politicians) are responsible for this. For allowing, for pandering to feminist demands, for craving for a female pat on the back, and for disregarding other males, after they have safely got their vote.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:55 PM
14

You voted for him???????
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:34 PM
3

It's beginning to happen!
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:59 AM
10

"It's insane that an MRA would be targeted for violence. Why? For what..." Because any move towards helping men might mean a little less going to women.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 06:23 PM
11

I see, on another page, discussion of a possible law outlawing "coercive behaviour". Women's groups were said to be against the idea, because "the woman may be assumed to be the primary aggressor", and, "unless police are given training". Here we go again. They only want this law to be introduced if males are subject to it and the police are trained to ignore female primary aggressors.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 04:04 PM
8

And immediately released with apologies and a letter from the president, presumably.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 06:23 AM
-1

Unfortunately, men in power have disagreed. They have put women first (after themselves, of course).
/r/MensRights02/06/19 09:28 AM
18

It's appalling. Especially the way most people believe everything they are told. About other people, that is. Look at it this way; you really don't want or need people who behave like that.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 09:08 AM
2

At least they take this sort of thing seriously over there.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:54 PM
1

Mike says "the state" discriminates against men and boys, but this is not strictly correct. It is the people with power (in this country, that is, essentially, the labour and Conservative parties), that are responsible for men and boys' second class status.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:24 PM
3

I don't have problem with this - provided they are cubicle toilets, only. If any of these toilets have urinals in them, (a) I will not be using the toilet, and (b) I will not be visiting the chain. The only thing that interests me, is MY privacy. I am not interested in anything else.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:55 PM
5

You've learnt. That's what is important.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:37 PM
12

Well done. This is the way men must learn to act. Be completely ruthless with women. Put yourself first, middle, and last. Now put the woman out of your mind and take care not to have regrets. A lesson for males everywhere.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:47 PM
4

So, why don't women volunteer to replace the mice?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:35 PM
16

This is where we are heading while politicians, journalists, and others pander and surrender to feminism, and pc activists. can't these morons see that the only result will be that they will demand more and more?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:11 PM
8

With the WHO recognising parental alienation in spite of fierce feminist pressure to continue to allow wives to use their children as weapons against their former partners. little bits of good news is beginning to filter through.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:26 PM
32

Exactly. Men need to start being as ruthless as women are with them.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:10 AM
1

Well done, Storm! For seeing off this clown, and refuting, absolutely, his feminist-serving garbage.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:47 PM
3

I agree. Under recent feminist-submissive governments, the UK has been pretty bad. But the Conservative Party (of whom I am not a traditional supporter) does have a couple of very good men with spines (Raab & Davies). This may be the beginning of the end, as far as feminism in the UK is concerned and, with Raab as Party leader, and Davies as one of his team, I'm ready to vote Conservative on that basis only, whilst disagreeing with a lot of their other stuff. So far as I know, the EU does not ha…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:08 PM
3

A defeat for feminism which wanted to help female partners use their kids against their male ones.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 12:14 PM
1

You know him better than I do. can we allow him to join Latham and Leyonhjelm?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:09 AM
5

The way to respond to this, is to ignore the loaded questions and use the option field to make your own points.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:38 AM
12

I haven't read all of it, but it seems to be a good piece. When will weak men learn that when they surrender to feminists, feminists will only come back for more?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:33 AM
5

What news? A feminist blaming everyone and everything but herself.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:23 AM
3

It was, but not until she had falsely accused fifteen men.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:09 AM
5

Sorry. Our Indian brothers are fighting back, though.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 07:10 PM
2

I just learned they did not.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 07:09 PM
3

With sex dolls now becoming sophisticated, there is, at last, an option.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 06:21 PM
12

Or: Men bad women good? -Yes. -Probably. They, like the UK and Canada and Australia especially, have been totally corrupted by feminism.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:50 PM
7

They tried to stop J4MB in Cambridge, also.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:16 PM
11

Pick "none" and use the box to make your own points.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:57 PM
20

The secret is to not answer their questions, but use the "other" field to make you own points.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:08 PM
17

They do offer you "other". Write your own caustic reply as I did.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:07 PM
25

I've just done it. More anti-male stuff, I'm afraid, although they do allow you to add "other" in most cases. I was able to make some good points about discrimination against men in military service, pension ages, and other directions. Please do the same.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:43 PM
25

And they fail to mention that feminists defend false accusers.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:14 AM
1

That's not sex equality! But it's a start.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 05:21 PM
5

Love this sort of thing. Sometimes, a picture can say more than a thousand words.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 05:20 PM
0

Which would be a pity. Just imagine the points he could make in the European Parliament.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:43 PM
5

Both are pretty bad, based, in my view, on the accepted assumption that the women's vote is more elastic than the men's. Or, to put it another way, male voters are more stupid or more resigned than female ones. Of the two, the Labour Party is, by far, the worst. Indeed, it was under them, and Blair, that the rot set in. Blair, who, for a number of reasons, I now think was one of the most stupid leaders we have ever had, allowed his famous "babes", or, to be more accurate, his fanatical feminists…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 11:56 AM
-3

My view is that it means an awful lot. When you consider how many politicians are on our side, I would suggest we ignore everything else and vote for him purely on that issue.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:34 AM
6

And will it be ensured that Bond kills an equal number of female villains?
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:28 AM
62

Too many desperate male journalists just hope it had happened to them.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:20 AM
1

The big problem for us is: feminists (and anti-male polices) will get priority over the few good things that Labour stands for. No MRA should vote for them.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:09 AM
1

I don't see that as an issue. Jews can be anti whoever they please. (just read what Israel's leaders say about other people.) Why can't people be anti them?
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:06 AM
3

To which I would add: yes, the public voted to leave, but by a small majority. And, since, if they had voted to remain by a small majority, UKIP would not have accepted that vote as a final say on the matter, there is no reason, in my view, why who those that want to stay should accept a leave vote by a small majority. Indeed, as I understand it, if the vote were held again, most people would vote to remain. (My own view, is that it is best to remain, mainly because it is best to be part of a bi…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:44 AM
6

The labour party is infested with feminists, and Corby panders to them.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:00 AM
1

That's true.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:51 PM
13

" She, on the other hand, has to put up with that, and dies sooner than if she never married..." This proves the man is an idiot or a liar. Women live longer than men; it's a well-known fact. Indeed, there is a town in Alaska populated entirely by women - the men have all died off.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:38 PM
22

What f****** lunatics. Indian guys: don't marry. Don't let the bastards get you down?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:31 AM
142

My guess is that it's the same reason as why sexual assault on males is often "funny". Why is this? I don't know. But I'll hazard a guess. It's because males are expected to abase themselves. Presumably, in a desperate search for pussy.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:30 AM
6

This is what happens when you employ women just because they are women. And it gets worse if you let the same women into high office, of for that matter, design bridges.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 05:22 AM
213

Yes, but women think 80% of men are below average.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:58 PM
100

The problem for you is, lady, men with 7inches and more may have standards.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 05:55 PM
2

F/O.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 05:48 PM
2

Regarding the second article: what is the government doing about it?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 04:20 PM
6

Feminist rot has spread everywhere.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 03:41 PM
3

Two feminists; one magina. Don't vote for them!
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:48 AM
1

Okay. I hadn't read that bit.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:09 AM
3

Phones are turning into a wonderful form of defence. And thank God for tv cameras.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:07 AM
1

Yes, that's correct. Not Koss, but they're basically the same kind of animal.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:00 AM
34

The 2% figure so often cited by feminists was created by Koss, I believe, after chatting with an unnamed NY police officer. Both a US sheriff and a German police force stated recently that in their experience (and they're on the front line, don't forget), "most accusations of rape are false." The feminist position, of course is tell a lie often enough..."
/r/MensRights24/05/19 06:46 PM
7

"Assault by penetration..." A person commits an offence if HE.... I haven't read everything, but my first thought is: here we go again!
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:38 PM
14

can't attack the arguments so they attack the man.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:03 PM
16

should have turned around and walked away.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 09:30 AM
1

Answer: They are not. The women are meant to be left to lesbian feminist leaders.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 06:37 AM
42

Long overdue.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 06:08 AM
5

Hit the bastards where it hurts most: in their finances. That is the best way of stopping them continually attacking and victimising men.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:51 PM
18

The Justice Secretary in this instance is a Conservative, the one party you would think would resist this madness. Both of the main parties in the UK are as bad as one another. Male voters: do not vote for either.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:08 PM
1

Agreed. And a reason why I won't vote for the two leading parties in this country. It is they who have let this happen.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:22 PM
11

And they are even more terrified that some of the public funds they get will be diverted away from them.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:17 AM
1

Unless it's with another woman.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:51 PM
4

The last labour government in the UK (under Blair) allowed feminists to re-write the law so that only males can be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:45 PM
5

If that is the case in a small country like Costa Rica, can you imagine how many cases there must be in larger ones that are simply never called what they actually are?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:37 PM
12

Women can be charged with raping men? Must be the only country in the world with such a law.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:11 PM
16

It just goes to show that a patriarchy, does not give privileges to men. Quite the reverse.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:02 PM
2

No mention of women raping men, though.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:39 PM
10

Why doesn't the UN "study" something important, such as the way men are seriously discriminated with pensions, and military service?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:23 PM
2

In the UK, it has been done. For example, in the well-known De Freitas case. The falsely accused male was wealthy enough to bring a case, but the false accuser killed herself. As I understand it, the policy now is to charge a small number of false accusers, but not to allow a private prosecution, mainly because of that case.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 04:15 PM
4

It's the BBC. Ignore.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:30 PM
1

Great guy But that was years ago, wasn't it? And everything is still the same.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:14 AM
1

Neither did I. But if it enraged feminists it did some good.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 07:07 PM
1

Agreed. And, I would add to the pantheon Mike Buchanan; Paul Elam; Philip Davies.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:35 PM
2

To which, I would add, that one of your problems is that you and your wife agreed to a division of assets as a final settlement, yet the other EU officials are trying to claim that maintenance is something entirely separate and that you should be paying that as well, ignoring the fact that in Sweden that was effectively paid in assets. Deplorable.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:31 PM
5

And who has brought about this state of affairs? Mike Buchanan claims "the state" is assaulting the rights of men and boys. Except that it isn't. It is an inanimate object that isn't assaulting anybody. It's politicians with power who are, and who have traditionally, assaulted the rights of men and boys. And, in the UK, we can narrow this down even further. The people who have made laws in this country for many decades are the Conservative and Labour parties. Don't vote for them!
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:26 PM
2

I can only suggest you employ a British lawyer well-versed in human rights and with a mind capable of dissecting the rubbish you have been sent. I would suggest Geoffrey Robertson QC, although I do not know what this would cost. In fact, I would suggest you should have come to London first.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:54 PM
0

An old article. As soon as the law was mooted, feminist leaders swung into action attacking the idea. It will not happen. They will win.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 12:27 PM
6

I remember reading about your case some time ago. You were badly treated by a French judge, especially. I will be very interested to see to read what happened next.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 12:24 PM
4

Also, of course, there is anonymity and probably a free handout courtesy the taxpayer.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:48 PM
12

She had "personal issues" at the time. Every female who is accused of an offence has "personal issues". It is time law and order saw through this common excuse.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:25 AM
5

"We", of course, are the people with power. In the UK, this means the Labour and Conservative parties. They pander to women's problems, told, of course, by the experts that the female vote is more elastic.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 09:12 AM
1

Needs to be re-named the WBC (Women's Broadcasting Service).
/r/MensRights18/05/19 07:45 PM
7

Good point. Feminists only want the guilty until proven innocent situation to apply when it suits them. Politicians are often too stupid or too venal to see this. This has already happened in some jurisdictions: Israel and Iceland being two examples.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:29 PM
8

You're pricing yourself too high, lady. Try 18%.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:40 AM
1

They are corrupt beyond belief.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:33 AM
1

Some progress. of course, it was always obvious that the BBC would have to be dragged kicking and screaming towards equality of reporting. It makes no difference to me. I won't give them a penny more than I have to, and the sooner I can make the organisation collapse, the better.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:32 AM
70

That's what feminism looks like, Erica. It is what Mike Buchanan has said it is: a female supremacy movement.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 06:55 AM
3

They probably just imply it. That's why anything re-written as this thing appears to be should be seen for what it is: feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:55 PM
7

Too late. Dolls are now available.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:23 PM
44

The heroes there, surely, are the MEN who flew over the radioactive ruins to drop protective chemicals on the site and later died from radiation poisoning.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:04 PM
20

And she'll get a pussy pass. Surprise, surprise!
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:27 PM
2

Nice. But should have read: "Extra rights!"
/r/MensRights15/05/19 03:42 PM
1

Rather you than me.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:39 PM
5

Presumably, on the grounds that they are "victims".
/r/MensRights14/05/19 04:11 PM
1

What is even more awful is that a supposed conservative politician is allowing her to pour her filth over innocent men.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 11:49 AM
3

Exactly. Yet another man-hater put into a position of influence by a supposed conservative government. Gawk is also the man who changed the recent divorce laws simply to benefit women. I would not vote "Conservative" under any circumstances whatever.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:40 PM
9

Ignore. The same sort of thing could be done to leading feminists, I am sure. But nobody would dare, or have the inclination to do it.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:00 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 06:56 AM
13

If you follow the story, a corrupt police officer who had an affair with the falsely accused man's wife, helped jail the innocent man.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:49 PM
1

One lasts less than an hour; the other lasts years.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:57 PM
5

"...the pair intend going ahead with the wedding later this year, aware that a pussy-pass will be issued..."
/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:42 PM
5

Let's not forget that surveillance cameras have saved many falsely accused men.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:08 AM
191

Women already have more rights than I have, so fuck off lady!
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:05 AM
7

The "Patriarchy" "favouring" men, again.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:36 AM
5

Are you saying that a female can assault a male over the age of eighteen without asking his permission?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:20 PM
3

Exactly. The double standards used in connection with those two groups parallel in a peculiar way the double standards exhibited by feminists. "With me, it's okay; with you it's wrong!" The cry of "anti-Semitism" can be interpreted as: "That's something I don't like!"
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:11 PM
1

"As with calling out Islamic terrorism..." This woman is of course of the group that puts up statues to their own terrorists in their home country.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:54 PM
6

Muslim = bad. Jewish = good.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:46 PM
1

My error.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:17 AM
5

Yes. The clowns here in the UK allowed one lesbian feminist to make 13 false allegations, including one that put an innocent guy in prison, whilst paying her taxpayers compensation in each case, before they finally prosecuted her.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:14 AM
2

Just goes to confirm that men's greatest enemies are often other men, and that "the patriarchy" may well mean there are men at the very top, but whilst they may put themselves first, they put women second and often persecute other men. An example was in the UK, where a patriarchy made male homosexuality illegal but ignored the female variety completely.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 06:04 PM
6

She was pressured by Jewish organisations.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:31 PM
10

Such companies will find that they have shot themselves in the foot.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:43 PM
38

Another feminist liar guilty of ending the life of an innocent man.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:46 AM
74

That's amazing. I hope somebody will have the balls to do the same in the UK.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 06:41 AM
4

One day, managements who always side with the female are going to find that they've only caused trouble for themselves.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 07:17 PM
1

What's news?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:50 AM
16

I googled it. I think it's a consumer protection outfit for the US government. This guy need to take this thing further.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:01 PM
1

I'm wondering why this issue can't be taken to courts as a violation of human rights. If men are required to serve, but women can just carry on, with their careers earning money or studying for higher qualifications, the gap is going to get even wider than it is at present.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:52 PM
8

What punishment did she receive? Any?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 03:04 PM
25

I'm sure they also believe liars.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:19 PM
5

Most western male politicians have been done already.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:40 PM
5

I'm not American, but I believe it did give rise to a number of articles. All of them, surprise, surprise, calling for the idea to be dropped.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:08 AM
18

This is what a feminist wrote in comment to this article: Concerns relate to disclosure of personal information to the rapist and being used against them in court when it is not relevant to the case. Judges are letting defense barristers get away with using inadmissible evidence to sway the jury without permission from the judge. Rape victims have had evidence of previous affairs and use of sex toys used to undermine their credibility - in a public court - in defense of their rapist. Women’s sex…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 10:29 AM
2

If you cry out sexism at every tiny example of it, people won't take you seriously. Feminists do this and most male politicians take them very seriously.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:56 AM
6

They've been given away by male legislators in return for women's votes and the praise from women they seem to crave.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:53 AM
1

I didn't know they had it in them.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:03 AM
1

If accusers refuse access to electronic evidence juries must be told and allowed to draw their own conclusions.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:02 PM
2

If accusers do not allow access to electronic evidence juries must be told and allowed to draw their own conclusions.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:59 PM
11

Let's see what women look like without tens of billions of dollars of makeup and beauty treatment.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:54 PM
5

"Mary P Koss (who helped both the Justice Department and CDC revise their definitions of rape) has some very interesting things to say on male rape victims of female rapists..." Indeed. How stupid are men? Couldn't they see that this woman had an agenda?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:12 PM
3

Agreed. People are finally waking up to the scandal. It is, of course, male politicians who have allowed it to get this far.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:01 PM
3

It's about the same as other western countries.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:51 PM
14

That "defence" has been specifically denied for male offenders.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:27 PM
29

Very sensible of them. Having sex with a female (especially) opens you up to all sorts of difficulties because the law is always on the woman's side. If you do need to do it, stick to prostitutes.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 07:22 PM
4

Signed.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:43 PM
7

The women's movements will discard this clown like a used condom when they've finished with him.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 05:45 PM
3

Select gender: baby killer/male.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:58 PM
2

Unfortunately, it isn't a crime anywhere.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:46 PM
6

In the daily Telegraph too. I had always looked on them for some sense. They do, however, give Nigel Evans a chance to bring perspective.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:26 AM
9

Politically correct journalism again. They are fighting "women's rights?" No, they are fighting women's privileges.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:13 AM
25

But they still refer to the woman as a "victim".
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:59 AM
6

I've read a few articles about this and every single one refers to accusers as "victims". Wrong. Please also correct the title of this post.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:29 AM
24

Everyone has now been so brain-washed by feminists that every single article I looked at referred to accusers as "victims".
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:27 AM
11

Exactly. The only people against this are potential false accusers and feminist engaged on a war against men.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:55 AM
4

Well done, Max Hill. I didn't know he had it in him.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 06:15 AM
16

The source of these stats? Feminist delusions.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:51 PM
23

When will idiotic and spineless male politicians wake up to the fact that if they give in continually to women's demands women will simply keep coming back for more?
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:28 PM
35

If you kick a dog often enough, it will bite.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:10 PM
10

Nope. It's a PEOPLE problem, Patrick. Lots of men suffer too.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 04:25 PM
6

It's The Guardian. The Labour clown's comment is also amusing. Davies has "little credibility"? He has a large majority, and thrashed the Women's Equality Party at the last election.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:48 PM
2

I've just asked them to do one or the other: end registration for males or make it compulsory also for females. Luckily, they didn't want to know where I'm located (which is the UK!).
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:47 PM
3

Because most of us continue to vote for male politicians who do nothing for us at all.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 05:00 PM
7

Which university?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:46 PM
57

Will do. It makes me feel good, too.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 06:12 PM
1

Good response.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 10:35 AM
31

Exactly. When I commented on a Youtube video somebody came back with the response: "When you have been privileged, equality looks like oppression." But most men have not been privileged. Only the top tiny percentage of men, those in power and hereditary wealth, have been privileged. The rest of men, perhaps even ninety-eight per cent of men, have had a rough time. For the simple reason that men in power may put themselves first, but they put women second. The give women privileges they do not al…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 07:05 PM
22

Don't trust them.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:24 PM
4

I, for one, would be extremely interested to find out how they dealt with this guy considering they will always try to shame the male even if, as in this case, witnesses say he was attacked first. Also, the woman who sexually assaulted Own Shroyer is due in court about now, I think. If anyone hears anything, please post it in this forum.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:59 AM
11

Is there any more news about that incident? I googled but cannot find anything.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:41 PM
2

Women have been very smart traditionally in this area. They know that by complaining frequently they attract attention away from their own behaviour. A case in my personal experience illustrates this wonderfully. About twenty years ago, the local authority re-furbished a sports centre not far from me and I went along to try out the new spa area. It had no windows, of course, but had skylights, and I thought the way the whole place had been constructed was impressive. So, I told the attendant I w…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:39 AM
2

Feminist arithmetic.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:35 PM
7

I live in Wales but, luckily, am retired. I believe I read somewhere that they give something like seventy times as much to women's groups as men's groups.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:22 PM
3

Yes, indeed. Great news. With Leyonjhelm that makes four balls in Australian government.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:04 PM
1

There needs to be but there won't. The feminists who control international organisations would go bananas.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 04:40 PM
2

I suspect the papers do not use the word rape because of wanting to side with tradition. If you read the comments sections when they exist, you will find that most commenters support women being charged the same as men.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 07:07 AM
3

It has been tried at least once: I know, because I signed it. I don't know what the result was, but I suspect it simply did not - or has not yet - gained sufficient support. Not that it would get anywhere even if it got to parliament. Politicians in the UK live in fear of the feminist lobby. They have never - to my knowledge - passed a law that in any way affects women adversely, or even a law that gives direct help of any kind to males. I will not vote for them.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 07:05 AM
17

It'll go on as long as men put up with it.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 01:26 PM
6

The victims are, of course, their students.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:10 AM
3

Because there are no votes in it.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:30 PM
14

"Absolutely everything is done to minimize what this woman did..." I think I would re-phrase that. Absolutely everything that is being done is being done to try to bring some sort of balance to what this woman did, and to stop the maniacal urge that most media now have to diminish male efforts, work, and achievements in the interests of supporting the matriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:54 PM
8

She was drunk on board a plane and spat at an Indian member of the aircrew. I thought women were forgiven for that sort of behaviour! The judge must have had a spine transplant.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:26 PM
1

Because men feel threatened by men who are not like they themselves, perhaps? And it goes much further than just gayness, I think. One leading UK footballer not so long ago was attacked by team supporters for saying he was interested in antiques. Most men expect other men to conform simply to help satisfy them that they are right, I think.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 09:04 AM
3

Who is?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:21 AM
413

Male victims are arrested too.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 07:25 AM
114

Fighting for equality lady, would mean giving up a lot.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:46 PM
2

They have. Here is what they said:
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:19 PM
9

Can't you appeal the sentence? Especially as you have evidence that it was you who were the victim?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:57 PM
13

Was the judge male or female?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:06 PM
11

When you hear the word "victim" instead of accuser, you know who is behind the proposed changes.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:21 PM
5

Probably too many feminist lawyers at LegalAdvice!
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:02 AM
2

Trouble is he may want a 6' woman.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 03:38 PM
2

The women's groups will get her out soon.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 12:59 PM
2

Let's hope it passes. If it starts somewhere, it tends to spread.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 08:23 PM
1

That looks good. What chance does it have of being passed?
/r/MensRights18/03/19 08:09 PM
7

An when are men getting a free day to acknowledge that they make the overwhelming majority of workplace deaths?
/r/MensRights15/03/19 04:52 PM
3

Goodbye to Berlin!
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:47 PM
4

She brings up the earnings myth, of course.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:06 PM
6

"Female recruits will also be stripped naked and humiliated by male soldiers..." Pull the other one! They won't even be stripped to their bras and panties.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:43 PM
9

It's been going on for years.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:33 AM
4

Don't let them do that to you. They are a minority - that manage to make a lot of noise. The sort of behaviour many of them exhibit comes out of a sense of inferiority, not the opposite.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 07:29 PM
2

I think it will. Then they need to stop paying compensation. I believe they did both in Germany and accusations of rape dropped sharply.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 08:11 AM
9

And Leyonhjelm. Matters are improving. Now there are four balls in Australian politics.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:30 PM
1

...and deliver a broadside on the final day.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:24 PM
1

A well-written piece about an appalling story. Why don't you send it to Mike Buchanan of j4mb. It will go well on his site.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:10 PM
3

My view would be to let her make the first move. Then respond. Almost every claim feminists make can be rebutted by logic and destroyed. If you're in any doubt about what to say, I would post whatever she has said in this forum. Somebody here will always help you out.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 12:58 PM
1

All publicity is good publicity. Spanish politicians ought to be ashamed of themselves. British ones are not much better, though.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:08 PM
3

Keep bringing up tragic but comparatively rare cases such as this whilst demanding changes and getting weak and cowardly politicians to make more and more "small" changes to the law so that we head towards what feminists want: men will be guilty and sentenced when a woman says so.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 06:24 PM
3

It's much needed at The Guardian, too.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 08:28 AM
21

Religious fruitcakes will control the NPCC.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:54 PM
1

What time did they broadcast? 02.00am? Orkney, only?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:04 AM
23

White knight lawmakers will protect them.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:28 PM
3

Surprise, surprise.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 10:50 AM
1

See Bamford's comment.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:13 PM
25

Wow! I didn't know they had it in them.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:10 AM
14

Plenty of mangina politicians will be only too happy to do what they want, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:57 PM
12

If you kick a dog enough, it will bite. Aren't we now getting near that stage with men? After all, voices are beginning to be raised at last.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:43 AM
4

It would make no difference. Laws banning prostitution in Sweden apply to Swedish men even when they are abroad.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:44 PM
51

Our bodies; our choice.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:25 PM
7

No surprise. The charity is to aid women.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:19 AM
2

The UK's does. X8!
/r/MensRights21/02/19 07:16 AM
2

And if any of those attorneys are falsely accused, they will, no doubt, agree.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 05:41 PM
4

A typical male submissive.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:31 PM
8

Too late.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:32 PM
186

Somebody must have twisted their arm for that.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter