TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Worried_Baker_9462 Archive

View 1 post and 79 comments by Worried_Baker_9462 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
130

MGTOWWorried_Baker_9462/r/TheRedPill20/09/24 04:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Literally just put yourself first.
/r/Divorce_Men21/06/25 11:33 AM
4

Look man, you're gonna come out of this with some losses. Be thankful that you get off as light as you do. So many men have been completely destroyed and they end it. So take care of yourself. Value your health and freedom.
/r/Divorce_Men25/05/25 04:13 AM
8

Lawyer lawyer lawyer.
/r/Divorce_Men10/04/25 10:50 PM
15

Wow, so now that I have these facts, I can share then with a woman and her mind will change. That's how it usually goes down, right?
/r/Divorce_Men05/04/25 08:43 PM
1

Transformeeerrss!
/r/TheRedPill03/04/25 04:51 AM
2

Are you chatGPT in disguise homie?
/r/TheRedPill03/04/25 04:49 AM
8

This is the most valuable part of this post: So find that most hated frame, fuck off with the words and labels, find that frame that’s just annoying. It will be different for everyone. It’s the thing you hide and hope no one ever sees. But if you let that shadow control you you become enslaved to the opinions of not just others, but yourself." And I feel the method and mechanism was not quite explained. Are you saying by your title, to admit to yourself or to actually admit to other people the m…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/25 11:53 PM
2

The problem of posturing that you highlight is one of the male strategies of self esteem protection, since they have it dependent upon competitive sexuality. This is an insecurity that is probably detectable to women, ironically.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/25 11:25 PM
12

Yes men are easy to manipulate as a sex. This is naturally selected. As is the complementary nature of women.
/r/Divorce_Men21/03/25 11:35 PM
7

Indeed, sometimes IOIs are just to "get you".
/r/TheRedPill21/03/25 06:12 AM
27

No there's not. It's set up for women to win all conflicts that arise with men. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/Divorce_Men17/03/25 09:23 PM
6

It's to create a paper trail to claim abuse. All I can say is consult a lawyer who knows how to handle the optics, given the bias against men.
/r/Divorce_Men15/03/25 09:55 AM
13

You think the conservative ones are different? You think you'd ever find out about the past?
/r/Divorce_Men14/03/25 05:29 AM
5

Just keep the ivy trimmed. Don't let it get around your other plants to the point where to rip out the ivy you need to rip the whole garden out. This is not about gardening.
/r/Divorce_Men10/03/25 10:31 AM
10

Yeah no one thinks men are perfect. It's usually the illusion that women are perfect which people are under.
/r/Divorce_Men08/03/25 11:55 PM
1

As a F.A.G myself, and having a basic knowledge of thinking errors, I find it difficult to conversate with people when they are uninterested in falsifying their ideas on the basis that they have analyzed or reasoned with a fallacy. My time is spent talking to them in person as if they're babies whose worldview I can't shatter for their own sake, or online in painstaking and redundant explanation. The globalists know that ability in critical thinking and an actual competence in understanding the …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/25 06:15 AM
4

Schopenhauer. Based pessimist.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/25 08:28 PM
1

The women-are-wonderful effect. Science!
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:02 PM
2

Don't believe that satisfaction is in women and it won't be a big deal. It's just a challenge, it's not like accomplishing the challenge is going to bring you eternal happiness. Like playing video games.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/25 03:00 AM
3

Women: We prefer bears to men. Men: Let 'em have the bears. Good luck. Au revoir.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:08 AM
-2

Yeah some things are out of our control.
/r/Divorce_Men29/12/24 11:23 PM
12

Being bitter and hateful implies that women are relevant to you and your needs. If you literally just give up on them and avoid them all, you don't need to give a shit about them anymore. They're just bad people. Accept it. Don't forget. Don't get involved.
/r/Divorce_Men29/12/24 09:36 PM
2

Yes, watch it in yourself and see the futility in any resistance to reality.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/24 02:58 PM
2

It isn't necessary to want them or to marry them. You don't need to settle for them. You can just be alone. You may not want to be alone. You have needs. Okay, well, I guess you'll need to devise a different fantasy. The blue pill fantasy isn't tenable. You know, you just can't put that square peg in that round hole. It's not gonna fit. You thought it was a round peg, but no it's a square one. So instead of trying to put it in the round hole, put it in the square hole, and accept that there is n…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/24 01:38 PM
3

It is the belief that relationship to them, when they are virginal, would bring satisfaction to you that causes the anger. This is pedestalization. Yes you get someone else's dog, but even if it were your dog it would still be a dog, not a unicorn. If you get the dog younger, it's nice but eventually it becomes an older dog. What it is that you think you're not getting or would otherwise have gotten if things were more fair from this angle of perception, is not something you would ever have been…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/24 05:14 AM
6

Just time. "Should be" is a theme of thought that gives rise only to indignation. Attachment to what "should be" but is not can only cause grievance.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/24 10:03 AM
1

There's no reason to do that unless I am interested in establishing some kind of channel of communication with her. And since that isn't the case, me talking to her would be free attention, which is not something I deem appropriate.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/24 05:57 AM
7

Your attention costs what? Doesn't cost sex. Maybe now it doesn't cost anything. Maybe you're free attention and you just get nothing. And maybe you think that's fair. So that's what you get. If you didn't think it was fair to you, you wouldn't engage in that deal. You'd find a better deal. Maybe you're just on the shelf and they can pick you up for free and use you and then put you down whenever they want.
/r/Divorce_Men24/09/24 02:55 PM
1

No, I don't make any effort to interact with women. I just want peace.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/24 01:41 AM
3

I agree. Here's some thoughts for the interested. Women often select for men who are “losers” who don’t give a fuck about social norms, about right and wrong, about fitting in, following the law, being kind, or God forbid “providing”. men who live a lifestyle that is completely unconventional, doesn’t match the status quo. that’s the key here. because of their "frame". The mechanism that allows a man to have a frame is something that is usually not modulated by him. It is often modulated by the …
/r/TheRedPill22/09/24 12:13 PM
1

Bruh why is this my problem? I just made a post and you removed it because someone else decided to copy it????
/r/TheRedPill22/09/24 12:08 AM
1

Your stance is more of a radical acceptance, to the point of willingly operating within the parameters of the real game. I'm not at that point. I still want the blue-pilled fantasy of idyllic love, I recognize that the fantasy is not feasible or rational, and I also don't regard the real game as a game worth playing. My philosophy is, I'm just going to do what I want with my life and I don't care what women want, since they can't give me what I want.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 07:03 AM
1

Reciprocity; another naturally selected behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 06:50 AM
1

Feel free to define love as you like. What I'm saying is that the kind of love I described is what many men fantasize about, and that there is no stable incentive for it to occur. Furthermore, there are many more reasons to love your friends and your dog than to procreate with them. For example, I would venture to say that friendship aids survival which enhances the probability of genetic successes via survival and resource acquisition and retention... etc. All about genetic success, directly or…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 06:36 AM
2

No. At the level of abstraction that my post talks about, I agree with that. And at the same time, I acknowledge that you cannot prove that physical reality exists.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 06:31 AM
0

Physical reality doesn't exist either. There's just experience and then interpretation of it.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 04:49 AM
9

"Best option" is subjective. Different things are valuable to different women in different situations. Like maybe meth.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 04:45 AM
2

Lmao
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 12:08 AM
15

Given that they hypergamously selected that partner, I'm sure they would like to keep that partner and secure that partner's compliance to have resources for the child. But now any man can provide resources. In fact, some men who may not be a hypergamous selection for genetics may be a great option to provide for the child. Women can have strong feelings for a man. It's just temporary that he will be the best option in her environment. I do not see any evidence that they love men the way that me…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/24 06:04 PM
2

I actually agree with you. All decisions, however, make sense in terms of gain and loss to the person who makes the decision. I may practice restraint from promiscuity if I believe it serves my congruence with my religious values, for example.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/24 05:49 PM
5

I can understand why this would be satisfying and why it would have been naturally selected to be. Is it satisfying to do all of that and be cheated on and divorce-***** one day? I'm saying that what we are naturally selected to do as men does not benefit us, especially today. We are just born and bred to be on the plantation. Strong. Silent. Productive. It would be okay if we still could have what we once could have by living that way.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/24 05:41 PM
26

That would rely on the assumption that men and women have the same or comparable sexual strategies and constraints. They do not. So it does not follow. Specifically, women are the sexual selectors, due to the cost of pregnancy.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/24 05:32 PM
4

In my opinion, all cognitive and social abstraction is in service of biological imperatives. It may be that there are differences across cultures. And I don't think it would be likely for any outcome to occur that did not have a cause. Incentive is a good heuristic to estimate cause. In fact, incentive is a good heuristic to estimate how we would have evolved on the basis of incentive.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/24 05:23 PM
2

Women like to feel wanted. And preferably without them doing anything. So if some guy is writing poetry about them with her doing literally nothing, that feeds the ego.
/r/Divorce_Men19/09/24 02:47 PM
12

So she's just gonna upgrade to a different model.
/r/Divorce_Men18/09/24 12:52 AM
2

Leading =/= trying to control. A leader leads people who want to follow.
/r/Divorce_Men16/09/24 12:46 AM
6

Trusting people and feeling disappointed when they do not act according to what you expected, feels extremely disheartening.
/r/Divorce_Men14/09/24 01:45 PM
14

Actually yes. Men don't define 'alpha'.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/24 08:14 PM
1

I agree, except for the idea of control. Determinism and all that.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/24 10:20 PM
2

I would suggest that the real reason why emotional reaction parses as a failure is because the only time you emotionally react is when something is relevant to your needs. And what kind of man perceives his relationship to any specific woman as so highly relevant to his needs that he would react?
/r/TheRedPill25/08/24 10:25 AM
1

Direct game sales pitch.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/24 06:16 AM
1

Don't let yourself engage with imaginary objects. There is no satisfaction in them.
/r/Divorce_Men03/08/24 04:41 PM
10

Is it your daughter?
/r/Divorce_Men17/07/24 04:59 AM
3

Very Buddhist in fact.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/24 05:17 PM
5

May we all be at ease.
/r/Divorce_Men31/03/24 04:11 PM
2

Seems you've identified there is no longer a habitable environment. An ecosystem eroded bit by bit, until nothing can survive without unnatural intervention. So, why not just let go of everything? Renounce worldly things, knowing they are unsatisfying. This is the truth of suffering, one of The Four Noble Truths. Why not practice Buddhism and orient your life around meditative attainment, to prepare for when WEF causes us to "own nothing and be happy"?
/r/TheRedPill31/03/24 02:52 PM
9

You have no obligation to provide any emotional support. Especially if it is harmful to you.
/r/Divorce_Men13/02/24 06:21 AM
3

Money isn't real
/r/Divorce_Men07/02/24 04:39 AM
8

Trololololol
/r/Divorce_Men02/02/24 01:30 AM
6

Aside from your evaluation of red pill content, regarding emotional support, what is it that you are looking to find resources to address? Emotional pain can be addressed in a number of ways that generally do not have to do with believing anything. I would go as far as to say that a belief is not necessary to address emotional pain. Navigating the world effectively generally requires assessment as to which avenues are beneficial or harmful to one's needs. This requires some evaluative mechanisms…
/r/Divorce_Men18/01/24 04:04 PM
8

Imagine the worst possible thing and accept it knowing you have not been diminished whatsoever.
/r/Divorce_Men14/01/24 07:12 AM
11

Part of freedom is freedom from compulsive thinking about it and feeling about it and reacting about it. To stop reacting, detach yourself from considering her as a part of you and being yours, and ideas about your relationship. She's her own person out there now, you're free.
/r/Divorce_Men14/01/24 07:11 AM
10

The gym is not about getting women. The gym is about personal power.
/r/Divorce_Men08/01/24 03:38 PM
0

If you play a video game and there is no challenge to overcome, why would you pay any attention to that video game? When you beat the video game, what do you do? Do you keep playing it or are you more likely to play a different video game? Maybe you sell it for cheap to contribute a bit toward buying a shinier game that you want.
/r/Divorce_Men03/01/24 01:20 PM
9

Basically the core of the advice is actually just physical exercise.
/r/Divorce_Men01/01/24 03:20 AM
8

Yes. Google the term "economically attractive"
/r/Divorce_Men30/12/23 02:25 AM
2

Don't expect to be appreciated by people who expect you to serve them.
/r/Divorce_Men20/12/23 04:19 AM
27

I consider rejection as a good thing. It means everyone had a say about whether a thing would meet their needs. There was an opportunity for something to happen, which is better than nothing. You wouldn't want someone who didn't want to engage in a thing with you to do so. Because that would just suck. Imagine a 50 year old dude getting his reluctant yearly hand job from his wife who's playing candy crush with her other hand. If someone isn't interested, whether you know this or not, you actuall…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/23 03:36 PM
2

I can see one side where one might say that if she doesn't care about her relationship, why should we? However, it's because we have respect for the boyfriend's life situation. Because we understand he may suffer from her cheating. It's sinful in most religions for this reason, adultery. Anyway, you're overly critical of yourself. Relax.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/23 04:53 PM
3

I suppose the point is that with things like common law marriages, which do not require a wedding, the government will outframe you by seizing your assets and income.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/23 05:44 PM
1

You can't fix it. She doesn't want to fix it. So you can't.
/r/Divorce_Men23/07/23 07:03 PM
2

I was attempting to use the language in your post, regarding the absence. Yes, that's true, contrast is what allows the domain of perception and distinction. It's just awfully derivative of our biological imperatives, our current perception of value. I think that this is true slavery. EDIT: I also think that it is inescapable, whether through meaning or otherwise. Some agents of a species just are lower in value. So what.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/23 08:10 PM
1

What I find insulting about this post is the fact that you make assertions without any support. "Difference constitutes subjectivity" Does it? And are you relying on me to figure out why this matters toward your point? I would ask you: what is the purpose of this statement and others like it? I wouldn't say that it's wrong to be poetic, but is it useful? I think your salient point is great though. Here's a presupposition: that it is valuable to not be a conditioned automaton, that somehow a life…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/23 07:45 PM
1

Why does it matter if something is or is not forgotten? Consider the cause and effect of goodness. Like pouring water into the ocean, its level has raised, imperceptibly.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/23 07:57 PM
9

This is not just the case with porn. With work, study, creativity, ETC(!), the optimal point *will* be to use AI for productivity sake. However, in the process, we will lose so much. How can you preserve your spirit when the environment you inhabit will be filled with AI? Everything will be AI. Anything short of becoming amish is probably going to fail.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/23 01:54 AM
2

Tryna make it hurt more. For the feeling of security, that she still has your attention when she leaves. If you ask me? Why should you give her any attention? She's completely pulled her side of things away and still expects attention from you. So, it doesn't make sense, does it? Good job.
/r/Divorce_Men03/03/23 02:50 AM
1

Consult with multiple professionals discreetly, do your research discreetly, and if you're going to exit, find a way to do so where you get minimally wrecked.
/r/Divorce_Men25/01/23 02:30 AM
2

What do you mean? Yeah you treat women as people. You talk to them, look at their body language, catch a vibe... and then you can literally tell them your intention for speaking to them, and ask them to take the next logistical step (come over, etc) to the outcome you are personally interested in. You can literally ask for consent. And they can say no if they want, which is great. Or they can start "shit testing" you which is a good thing as well. If you think direct game doesn't work, you would…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/22 01:43 PM
3

This is "direct game", like "mode one". Valid, ballsy way to live life.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/22 05:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter