TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WorshippingLasagna Archive

View 0 posts and 164 comments by WorshippingLasagna on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I’m a veteran, I have PTSD, when back from the field I was a mangle of a man. Therapy was the best thing that happened to me bro. It’s not easy, because when you break a bone and don’t immediately fix it, the bone fixes in the wrong way and they need to break it again to have it heal properly. So therapy is not a walk in the park, it hurts at the beginning, but I can assure you it fucking works. It did with me. It changed a shipwreck of a man into what I am now. I am proud of myself, I am happy …
/r/TheRedPill28/12/22 09:09 PM
1

Come one mate, flirting is not about saying merry xmas of course. It is when you chat with a person conveying the message that you are sexually available and you could potentially be interested in the person you are flirting with. This said, why enforcing anything? The whole point is about myself only: I am not the guy who stays in a situation I don’t like. This includes a flirting gf. if I see that, I go. She knows it and that’s it. Super easy. As said, I am not needy 😊.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/22 07:25 AM
4

A fellow buddhist here on reddit? Karma to you mate
/r/TheRedPill25/12/22 10:25 PM
2

This is actually very true: if you love her set her free. Then find another one who’s better.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/22 10:22 PM
5

Bah, if this is actually true (and I doubt it), it is not something that needs to be analysed with the redpill toolset. This is something falling straight into clinical psychology: the guy clearly needs therapy, full stop. This said, I personally believe that poly is plain bullshit. I will never share my woman, the one for which I have feelings, with anybody. The moment she does something sexual with somebody else, then I step up, shake hands, say thank you for the good time together, turn aroun…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/22 10:17 PM
10

Man let go. This sub was once great, but still then it was infested by redpilled simps, that is guys who think TRP is about getting laid. Like fucking women were some sort of validation. I mean, fucking is just like eating: if you have your shit together and you have your goals clear, you eat and fuck regularly and there is nothing incredible to it. Now the sub is almost dead, but the infestation remains. Just go on with your life and let these keyboard PUA to their own comments and bad vibes. P…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/22 12:21 PM
1

Better this way bro 👍👍
/r/MensRights23/10/22 12:10 PM
1

Got it. But how did you meet her? Hookup at a bar, daring apps, friends? Still texting her? Etc?
/r/MensRights22/10/22 06:21 AM
1

I guess your worst enemy rn is your emotional response. Rationally, no woman forces a stranger to nut into her when she can get pregnant. Why don’t you elaborate a bit about the circumstances of your encounter? You said you rented a Lexus to go pick her up so this is not a random hook up. How did you meet her and what did you tell her? How did you two end up in having sex in your car?
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:50 PM
1

I don’t think blocking her is consistent with what I told you already. Can’t you just keep calm and wait? I mean, you said she wants the money for plan B and that the money take time to arrive, but we are talking 30 bucks here so where’s the problem. So, what are you two people talking about that is so urgent that you want to block her?
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:01 PM
1

Man, in my Country filing a police report requires alleging a crime and alleging a crime with no evidence is a crime. In my view you are probably being scammed, but with no evidence you go nowhere. So, my advice is just keep calm and wait for her next move. You have 2 scenarios here: she is crazy and got pregnant. Unlikely and close to impossible. In this scenario you have no legal moves. If she is pregnant and the child is yours, then you pay child support based on your income (that you say is …
/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:53 PM
5

I’m a lawyer (not in the US though, I’m in Europe) and my educated guess is that this lady is very likely an escort and she is trying to scam you with a fake pregnancy / abortion costs. All the events you report lead to this conclusion. This said: 1) she is not batshit crazy, she is just acting as such to get you super scared and emotionally invested, as having you in this state makes it easier for her to land the scam. 2) she is very likely not pregnant. This because a woman is fertile only 3-4…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 09:37 AM
4

My GF is 20 years younger than me and nobody complains in real life. Parents approve, friends approve, she is happier than ever and I feel like I am the luckiest man alive. Then on socials there is a whole lot of village’s idiots who - since in real life they always get silenced at the local pub - go to the internet and they troll anything that moves. My take is that internet and real life are two separate things which work on different rules. I also believe in the old marketing rule that the mo…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:26 PM
2

Any now and then a troll comes here to leave stupid opinions, because MRA is going mainstream and this attract trolls. Among these trolls, some throw homophobic contents. They get downvoted and, if they continue, they get banned. Therefore, no need to feel bad: public forum (on Reddit!) = you get trolls. Their blurting is not the general opinion of the forum nor the feeling of the average guy on here. The general idea is that MRA is about equality and that equality should apply regardless of gen…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:16 AM
2

I am with you on this one. It’s not about women are bad or anything. It is about no sexism, no discrimination etc. from whatsoever angle. Then we all know bad apples exist, but that’s unrelated to ethnicity, gender, religion etc. That is about that specific individual. Good and evil are unrelated to any ethnic, gender, religious etc. orientation. It is only related to the mindset of that individual. When somebody says kill all men, it says a big, Himalayan chunk of bullshit and, on top of that, …
/r/MensRights19/10/22 07:46 PM
2

😂😂😂 well it should have been “best”, not beat, of course, but if I didn’t misspelled I would not be laughing at your joke now 👍👍
/r/TheRedPill14/10/22 02:26 PM
1

My view is that there should be nothing wrong with feminism, to the extent there is consensus on the principle that feminism is a movement representing just the exclusive interests of women, regardless of anybody else. Basically the same way as trade unions represent just the exclusive interests of workers, regardless of anybody else. The problem is that, whilst trade unions are not allowed to dictate the principles of labour laws without consulting and listening also the employers’ associations…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:17 AM
0

On this, I agree. It’s a valuable tool when it comes to relationships and in that context it should be used more often.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/22 01:01 PM
2

TRP applies to mating, not to relationships. There are plenty of reasons to enter into a relationship for a woman: social, economic, security etc. There’s just one reason for that woman to get wet: hypergamy and 80/20. So, I agree on the temporary relationships concept, I also read about it and I have seen it play out IRL. But I don’t think that it necessarily contradicts TRP. An example is branch swinging: that happens in mating, she start banging somebody else because the new guy is chadder th…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/22 09:59 AM
3

I totally agree. Elon Musk is super successful and this more than compensate his looks. His success comes in part from his intelligence and in part from the fact that he has devoted his time to make things work: he actually lived within the premises of his Tesla factories for months working to make production efficient and he is now doing the same thing at Space X. This shows his commitment: hard work and dedication. Then, let’s see. My feeling about the future of humanity is still positive, not…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/22 06:53 AM
8

Thanks for this. I agree with you completely. My point about 10% was to give the threshold of the giga-Chad, but of course not all people can get there. I guess that, in summary, my point on this is that success in life is 1/3 looks, 1/3 money and 1/3 social success / power. Genes play a role on this of course, but I learned that many people just don’t fight because they haven’t enough motivation and they believe that it’s just genes, while I believe there’s more. My personal idea is that to ach…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 08:34 PM
17

Well there’s a lot going on here so I thought I would share my two cents and no hard feelings if I say something stupid. One thing is, yes times are changing like they always do. So now we have women in the workforce. Which is just good, because there is more women around. Yes, also more competition for men, but it’s again a good thing because competition makes a man stronger. Another thing is red pill rage. When I first swallowed it, the pill made me see the real nature of women and I got reall…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 07:10 PM
9

Yeah. Buddha said that a disciplined mind brings happiness. It’s true. I am older than you (in my 50s), I followed the same path as you and I had the same outcome. Also, it gets better the further one goes down this path.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 06:15 AM
35

Doo, doo, doo another one hits the wall. One of the things that I learned the hard way is that whatever thing fights nature, nature always wins. Feminism makes a lot of women believe a lot of things, but then nature comes and lol and behold: biological clock becomes loud, baby rabies, regret for the wasted years (or hamstering and justifications) and nature wins. What puzzled me when I first swallowed the pill is that, as a rational person, I used my 20s (and my 30s) to study hard and set the fo…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/22 01:51 PM
1

Sh*t I divorced all of them and still they say I am going to marry one. You can’t win 😂
/r/Divorce_Men03/09/22 08:43 AM
0

I agree with this analysis on so many levels, as I have seen the same pattern (I am 53 myself). I especially agree that, for the reasons OP explained so well, women on Tinder (and dating apps in general) tend to swipe on men the same way they shop, without really understanding if they really want the guy. However, I have the luck to work with younger people and the greater luck of having a gf way younger than me and I would like to contribute what I have understood of the women’s perspective, be…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 11:03 PM
2

I go with the 20/80 rule (women being attracted to the top 20% men and literally not seeing the remaining 80% as potential mating material) and in my experience it explains a lot of situations. As to opinions, based on the above rule one would say that women do not allow opinions from men except when they are expressed from the above 20%, because in that case they would let that man say whatever he wants to say and they would just accept it. When it comes to women, I guess it is relevant what Mi…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 08:10 AM
1

Thanks bro, not sure my post is so important, but I agree with you that sometimes some posts here stray too far from what TRP is about and I suspect that this is because TRP is somewhat mainstream now so that many people want to comment, but they haven’t read the sidebar first, where all the info has been available for years. Sign of the times probably. Anyway, stay safe out there, improve yourself and shine as the star you are. I’ll do the same 😊💫
/r/TheRedPill15/07/22 06:42 PM
17

I can only speak about myself and my personal experience, so I may be wrong and all, however here are my 2 cents. TRP is primarily a set of rules that explain how a woman is biologically pushed to behave and act in the sexual marketplace (SMP). These rules include, inter alia: 20/80: all women are attracted to the top 20% of men, the 9s and 10s in the famous 1-10 range, to the point that the remaining 80% is almost invisible to them. Hypergamy: no woman wants to marry down. Also, if a woman find…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/22 12:53 PM
2

It’s AWALT bro. Women are wired differently than men. Something similar happened to me a number of times, ie having sex less or more regularly with a woman and finding out that she had a regular boyfriend. I may have already commented about this, but here my humble view. Well, I’m rather attractive on average, good looking, tall, well mannered, top job etc, all things women find hot. Also, life made me become very confident in myself and helped me develop a zero fucks attitude (still polite, nic…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/22 03:03 PM
2

The concept of rape is jurisdiction specific so it can vary depending on the Country one lives in. To try to be as abstract as possible, the concept revolves around intentionally committing acts of sexual nature on a person without the consent of such person. Consent or no consent is tricky in an ongoing relationship and in my view it depends on circumstances. To make an example, I am ok being waked up in a sexual way and I let my GF know, so when she feels like it she can get advantage of my mo…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:55 AM
1

It is clear you haven’t grasped the basics of TRP. Also, calling me misogynistic is such a stereotype 😂😂😂. You know nothing of me. Anyway, as said: go find somebody else to pester. My beliefs are based on my experience. I applied TRP mindset and it works as bliss: I am better, stronger, more attractive, more successful than ever, my woman loves the way I treat her and I have more money than that I can spend. So, your target is not me nor anybody here who applies the principles of TRP in the righ…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 01:23 PM
1

Don’t be triggered bro and don’t put into my mouth words that I have not said. The woman I mentioned was not the only one I saw. I actually witnessed a huge lot of cases of AWALT, the one I mentioned was just an example. As to your point about people (including men) behaving shitty on average, I totally agree. My comment was about women as that was the topic at stake and the fact that men can be (and often are) total assholes does not make my poi t less valid. Also, I actually don’t see why you …
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 12:57 PM
1

Bro, who said I only saw one? Anyway, if you don’t like what you read either provide something valuable to the discussion instead of insults or just go read something else, the world is big enough, isn’t it? I mean, there’s no reason to read the Financial Times and get all angry if you don’t like capitalism. One of my exes is from China, she was great in bed, but a communist to the heart, she loved my dick, but at the same time she hated my white capitalist ass for this. Needless to say, it didn…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 09:25 AM
1

Man I was born in a small Italian town and nature only gave me some height (6ft, ok, it’s good). Nothing else apart not being overly ugly. I sweated a lot to get an education, served in the military, got deployed, got back with PTSD, went past it, made a career and a solid financial position. I did it all myself. Believe me, my (average) success with women comes from 2 things: my attitude and my willpower. Nothing else. Peace
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 09:15 AM
1

Bah, I don’t think this is the reason. Been with women of any age and culture in my life and I am pretty sure of my conclusion in this respect. My point is: just find balance and happiness in yourself. Then, enjoy women, knowing that, as everything else in the world, they may go away. Peace bro, I am waaaay past RP rage and totally in harmony with the world 😊 PS We’re nickname brothers 😂
/r/TheRedPill08/06/22 09:08 AM
77

They are like this. I am not sad for that. Eventually their task is to find the best genes to give birth to the next generation. Therefore they select, monkey branch etc. There is a purpose in their behaviour and a goal (creating a better next generation, therefore making evolution possible) which I endorse. One just needs to know this truth and carry on. Never had so much sex until I understood this basic concept: if you are a 9-10 you get it all, otherwise you struggle. No need to spend time o…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/22 12:25 AM
242

Bro, I’m in my 50s. Years ago, in my 40s, I was having sex with this chick. We were on my bed, I was lying on my back and she was riding me slowly, with circling movements, you know, the way they do when they want to please. So, her phone is on the bed and it rings. She answers, listen for some time and then goes like “oh babe, I’m sorry they have treated you badly at the office today. I’m going to cook you a nice dinner tonight, you so much deserve this” etc. Well, that’s when I discovered she …
/r/TheRedPill31/05/22 10:39 PM
6

Yeah, been there as well. My take is that if you are a good father then you are also a good husband, because both are grounded on love, loyalty, altruism and hard work, so I don’t give a fuck and carry on. The real problem is that when a woman says so and splits, very often she comes back after being for a while on the losing side of pump and dump. This is the problem, because (at least for me) once gone they’re gone and there is always a younger, prettier, better in bed and more loving woman ar…
/r/Divorce_Men13/03/22 04:07 PM
16

Oh the good father, but terrible husband complaint. In my experience this comes when a woman doesn’t feel comfortable in being married, but can’t find a better way to blame the husband. Let her go and be happy 😊
/r/Divorce_Men13/03/22 02:49 PM
3

Thanks bro. Yeah, I always believed that sometimes eating the shit life is giving you is the only way to move on and that every situation, good or bad alike, can teach us something and be the occasion for self improvement.
/r/Divorce_Men01/03/22 01:14 PM
2

I see you had your share of pain as well bro and I do relate. I am sorry for your loss, I didn’t experience a suicide, but I can understand the shock and the paid. When love ends, women turn like werewolves and love transforms into hatred almost immediately and at that point no kick is too low to deliver and there are no rules. Anyway, happy to see you made it out of that mess. I’m sure your young one will come out well from this, just keep close and show love as I’m sure you are doing already. …
/r/Divorce_Men01/03/22 06:44 AM
2

English is not my native language and I apologise. What I wanted to say is that the lawyer I hired was too soft and didn’t want to fight.
/r/Divorce_Men01/03/22 06:25 AM
13

My ex wife called me one afternoon of late May to tell me we had to talk, I ran back home and she told me she didn’t love me anymore. Both of us are lawyers, partners of international law firms and no kids, so money shouldn’t have been the problem. Well, we agreed to divorce. That was a big hit for me because I was still in love, notwithstanding the problems. I mean, I was aware of the problems, but my mindset was ok let’s find a solution to be together. Her solution was to drop me, so be it. 2 …
/r/Divorce_Men28/02/22 09:47 PM
1

Gen x myself and can confirm. I cook every time I can and I often do it with my 8yo. He is a pizza master already and we are now into meatballs with tomato sauce. Also, we are from Italy and we gotta keep up the stereotype 😂
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/22 08:49 AM
2

My 2 cents is that your friends are mindlessly following the “differences should not matter” nouvelle vague. What they say about man not having to have preferences is an oxymoron because it means that every woman (or man, if you reverse it) is being absolutely fungible for mating/relationship purposes, which in turn means denying the concept that every human being is unique, which is the basis for “differences do not matter”. Anyway, my anecdotal (myself and any man I ever talked to about these …
/r/MensRights18/02/22 10:15 PM
3

I’m a lawyer and when I divorced I hired a lawyer specialising in divorce and family law. As a lawyer, I could have done it myself, but hiring a pro made all the difference in the world. My advice: get a lawyer. Her sudden desire to divorce, your son getting 18 yo in October, her hiring a lawyer: these are all red flags. I know it’s expensive, but it’s like having a tooth fixed early by the dentist: you spend some money now and you don’t have to pay more in the future, because the tooth is fixed…
/r/Divorce_Men16/02/22 08:22 PM
2

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/01/22 01:12 PM
4

I’m a lawyer and couldn’t say that better, bro
/r/Divorce_Men23/01/22 12:50 PM
5

Lawyer here (not US though). My 2 cents is don’t marry until she’s over with the student loan. All comments here are spot on: one way or another, you are going to pay that loan with your money. Then, when she is done with her student loan, still don’t marry, because there is no advantage in being married since however low the risk is, still there is no reward. In finance, you take a risk to the extent there is a sufficient yield (e.g. you take on a risk of 1% of losing 100 bucks if you are paid …
/r/Divorce_Men22/01/22 07:32 PM
1

Bro take your time. We have a life ahead of us and it is long 😊. No need to rush 😊😊😊
/r/MensRights14/12/21 11:59 PM
4

Ok. Thanks for this. I personally believe that calling myself a feminist while advocating for equal rights is somewhat similar to calling myself a communist while supporting private property. There is some distance between the definition and the actual beliefs. But, anyway, thanks for your post. It’s refreshing and very welcomed to see that there are people using their brains out there. This may mean that gender wars are going to end eventually. I also believe that making too many distinctions a…
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:11 PM
23

Be strong bro. It’s a marathon, not a 100 meters race, but it’s going to be fine. Kids do not forget their fathers. Never.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 06:29 PM
3

Thanks bro. No probs for my PTSD, apart from loud bangs it does not impair me and it’s always a good reason to be cuddled by my gf. I agree with you on giving and not only consuming. Earth would be a better place if everybody did a little bit everyday, nothing heroic, just a little bit
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:52 AM
3

Well, I served, got deployed, got PTSD as a result. Nothing serious, I just tend to take cover anytime there is a loud noise around. Pretty funny for a lawyer in a grey suit (which is what I am now), but this is the cost I bear everyday for having served my Country. What I can’t grasp is when women take a political stance against serving. I mean, I did it for everybody, men and women alike. I guess serving is something that anybody should do, if needed, regardless of gender. Of course it is bett…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:16 PM
4

I came here to say exactly this.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/11/21 08:20 PM
2

Meal ticket 100%. Journalists have no clue how common it is for young women to try to use men as free food dispensers. It’s annoying, really, especially when they do this with young men who may be living on a budget. This said, this looks made up to me. Anytime I refused the meal ticket, the lady got engulfed with rage and the date ended there. No one proceeded to sit at a restaurant table food-less and drooling watching me having my dinner.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/21 09:29 PM
3

My take is this does not belong to r/pussypassdenied. This is a scam done by people uploading a pretty face and building up a story. Realistically, the person behind that account is a male guy from some part of the world where police is lenient on internet crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/21 08:36 PM
3

Well, in my culture feminism is less radical, so I might not see the patriarchy in all its evil due to the milder form of feminism we have here. Or it is just that the patriarchy is just a word and men are not the root of all evil. Which seems to me more likely. But again, I may be too latin…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 03:52 PM
4

I basically agree with you on the analysis and of course I am all in favour of clear consent. The problem I see is that manifestation of consent is usually very clear even when the man does not ask explicitly, but some people do not see it or misinterpret other signs, so shit happens. On this, I don’t really like the feminist solution, that is telling men they are potential rapists. The logical solution should be to have people learn to be better in communication. But I see your point: in a cont…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 01:37 PM
3

My 2 cents here and I am probably too old and too latin to say something about the new generations, but here is what I think, for what it’s worth: Consent is of course a rule, ie if one does not want then it is a no go and that’s it. Easy. 100% of the times and no exceptions. This said, the game of seduction implies flirting, which is essentially a game of hide and seek, run away and come back etc. This on both sides. In this game, most of the communication is non-verbal: body language etc. The …
/r/MensRights15/11/21 09:52 PM
12

There is actually a way out. For me, just saying “I’m sorry I don’t know” works wonders. Also, since I am religious about not being alone with a woman at work, I’ll let the other guy(s) answer. There is usually one or more who is simp enough to do the explaining/mansplaining. Besides, curiously, feminists tend to not get offended by simps. Probably, they do not consider them as men. Well, I don’t know.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 08:11 AM
2

I agree this is an argument a radical feminist will not accept, because radical feminists are not there for human rights. Yet, I guess it is an argument for everybody else. If one agrees that it is about equality and human rights, then it is easier to see how twisted radical feminist arguments are. Besides, it’s just a matter of time before the attention of the masses shifts to something else. I am here with my popcorn waiting that activists move on from feminism to green economy which is the ne…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/11/21 06:47 AM
4

Human beings are the same. Human being are alike. Human beings are important. More so, human beings have rights. Rights are given to human beings, not to some human beings only. Rights are given to all human beings. Not just to minorities. Rights are given to everybody. Do you breath? Fine, you have rights. It is as easy as that. Anything different means some human beings being treated differently than others, which is the root of fascism. I live. I am a human being. I have a life. I have rights…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/11/21 11:53 PM
2

I passed through some of these things, even if the outcome in my case was positive (I am a lawyer and this may have helped). As a lawyer, what I can suggest you is to turn down the DnD invitation and just follow the advice you have received. You already got a restraining order, which is a precedent. As false as it can be, for the law you already did something bad. I know it hurts, bro, but that’s the way it works: in the eyes of the law, you are not immaculate. As to general behaviour, I am not …
/r/MensRights11/11/21 09:01 PM
11

Well, it happened in Italy actually (in Milan). I see your point, however: Italy is indeed a place where people tend to keep to their own business, usually. What happened to me is unusual, based on Italian standards
/r/MensRights07/11/21 08:52 AM
177

Happened to me in a park when my kid was 2 yo. A lady called the cops on me because I stopped my son to play with the fountain (6pm in December, so the water was freezing cold) and he started crying. I am a lawyer, I explained the situation, but when the cop started to get nasty I asked to be taken to the police office together with the lady, took a pic of the cop and asked to talk to their CO. This worked as bliss. Sometimes you don’t want to discuss with the troopers. They are the arms and leg…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 10:41 PM
2

Thanks to you. Sometimes sharing is difficult. It was not so here and thanks for the exchange. Go for your essay lady. And rock
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:19 PM
2

Basically none that are significant or which left a scar, as I know how to navigate my sea. Anyway, your question deserves more than this so maybe I will elaborate a bit more. I am 52, Italian male. I have an 8 yo kid who was borne out of an almost random liaison I had at the time. I am in favour of abortion from an ethical perspective, but in my situation I had the resources to keep the baby and my personal morals (which are somewhat more strict than my ethics) pushed me to keep him. So I am no…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:11 PM
3

Based and spot on.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:04 AM
2

One perspective may be to link modern feminism to progressive liberal thinking. I am not american so I just see things from the outside and I may be wrong, but my take is that lots of people now are positively telling others how they must behave: eg the words that must be used, the ideas that one must have on certain topics etc. Based on this thinking, one is not free to have ideas, but must conform to what progressive liberals thinking provides, ie a pre-set of non discussed, imposed concepts. …
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:00 AM
7

I wore the same exact outfit for years, when I was young. It was a green outfit, it came with a helmet, a backpack, some other stuff and the idea that it was a privilege to wear it and to serve. I am proud to date of that outfit. Now I am a lawyer. I wear civilian, grey suit, and a black robe when I am in Court. Basically the same every day. I am equally proud of my outfit, it has a sense of mission, it speaks loud of what I am, my ideals, my values, my standards, my contribution to society, my …
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/21 10:21 PM
5

Get a lawyer now. Your only hope is that if you divorce her very close to the time in which she was working, the court will rule for reduced alimony, but this is Country specific (ie it would work nicely in Italy where I live, but maybe not in other jurisdictions). I am sorry, but that behaviour is typical of a woman who has taken the view to do nothing and either rely on your support or get divorce alimony instead. Go get a lawyer now. Don’t wait, not even one day.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/21 09:17 PM
16

Well, that happened to me personally. At the beginning I felt bad, because I felt trapped between my SO (we’re not married, but we have a child) and my needs (sex is not just pleasure, it’s a way to exchange feelings, so it is important beyond physical satisfaction). Then I understood that wanting to stay with me and at the same time withholding sex was ultimately a power move from her side, a manipulative behaviour, so to speak. Well, you know what? I hit the gym, lost my excess weight and got …
/r/MensRights03/11/21 06:15 PM
4

Bro, it’s difficult to answer this question without knowing what jurisdiction applies to your case. Out of logic (but mind that the law is not always logical), what you got is a postponement of the trial/hearing, so the process should not start over again, but continue after a postponement. However, rules governing court proceedings are very jurisdiction specific, so it would be important to know where this trial is taking place. I am realistically not the right guy to give you definitive advice…
/r/Divorce_Men27/10/21 07:29 AM
2

Well, my 2 cents on this one. First, it’s common in China to do these tests (not with 23 uninvited guests, but it is rather common to first date a girl and then see her coming with a friend). Second: social proof and validation are very important. Also, men are expected to take care and provide, so albeit crazy for a Westerner that behaviour is not crazy at all in China, especially with conservative/traditional people. Third, what is really puzzling is that the guy didn’t call the date off immed…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/21 10:39 PM
2

That’s it exactly. Good job bro. Stay safe and treat you with something nice every now and then. It’s a long process and it takes a toll in terms of energy, but you are going to get out of it stronger and better than before. 💪💪💪
/r/Divorce_Men22/10/21 05:52 AM
2

You have a lawyer. Right move. Now, your lawyer is there for a reason: to apply the law. The law is on your side here. Your lawyer’s job is to negotiate and manage your divorce for you. As a consequence, the first rule is: you talk to your lawyer, your lawyer talks with her lawyer and her lawyer talks to her. For no reason in the world you talk to her about anything connected with divorce. You let your professional handle it. If you talk to her about divorce related stuff, you risk agreeing to s…
/r/Divorce_Men21/10/21 10:15 PM
1

When it comes to equality, equal rights etc., the best lesson I got was from my drill sergeant back when I was serving. Short story: back in my time serving was compulsory for all males over 18 (legal age in my Country). So everybody had to spend at least 1 year in the armed forces, no exceptions. So, there was an issue about gay people, because there were a number of discrimination cases. In short, a number of them had a miserable life, because they were badly treated by their fellow “straight”…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 01:35 PM
-1

Now that MGTOW has been banned, people from there flow here, posting similar content. This, might result in this sub being banned for the same reasons MGTOW was banned. With this, I am not at all saying banning MGTOW was right. I believe in freedom of speech and I prefer to let people vent than to silence them. However, MGTOW was banned and if the same contents (and vibes) of that subreddit flow here, this subreddit might face the same fate. Which would be bad, because men’s rights is part of hu…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:17 PM
6

Thanks bro. I’m still learning, but at least I swallowed the big one and now life is fucking easy. Eat right, hit the gym, focus on career and hobbies and pussy comes in plenty. One thing I learned here some years ago is: if you treat a woman like a star, she will treat you like a fan. Well, I know better than that. Anyway, good night or good day depending on where you are around this globe.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/21 08:27 PM
21

Yes, I regularly get pussy. I also regularly get food, electricity, fuel, clothes and any other commodity. Why asking?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/21 07:50 PM
25

Long story short: TRP was about men willing to be stronger and being ok to suffer some to get improvement. At the same time, TRP is infested of complainers and whiners crying that women are so nasty because they are women. My two takeaways: Complaining about women being women is stupid. I am sorry, but it’s just stupid. It’s a lost battle against biology. They are what they are, accept it. Period. And if one doesn’t understand this, please read the sidebar, all of it and learn how hypergamy is f…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/21 12:26 PM
3

% of accusations of a given crime being proven false + % of accusations being proven true < 100%. This because there is a third category, which in most crimes has the higher %, that is the % of accusations ending up with a dismissal because not supported by sufficient evidence. In my view, it is on this third category that the discussion is most heated: some people say “believe all women”, which in Court would translate in ruling the accused as guilty on the sole basis of the accusation of the f…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 06:13 PM
24

Above average women attract most men and above average men attract most women. Then they (ie the above average ones) choose. It is as simple as that. It’s biology. Anything else is just Reddit and radical liberal ideology. Ideology vs biology is a lost battle. Biology always wins. A few more years and anything like that is going to be forgotten. Gen Z does not believe any of this crap. It’s just a white rich anglo saxon thing. The world is wider than that
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/21 09:02 PM
9

I totally agree. The way I see it is that feminism as they define it (equal rights etc.) simply cannot exist because of two basic reasons: hypergamy. It’s a fact, women have hypergamy as an evolutionary feature: as mammals, they can have just a few children and they need to ensure those children have either the best genes (alpha genes) and the best opportunities to survive (a male provider). This is good for evolution, but at the same time ensures that they, as women, cannot be in favour of equa…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:17 AM
17

I am truly sorry for this. It was a controversial sub and there was crap of course, like in any other sub, yet one could find gems and also help. It’s sad that it’s been shut down. Many men will miss the help that sub was providing. As to FDS, well, its success is the same of r/trashy. People do not go there for advice or help. They go there for the gross show. So I guess it’s more popular. Being popular and being helpful are separate things. Reddit knows the difference and goes for popular. So …
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:22 PM
1

Sweetheart, I already told you. It’s over. You refused coming out and I do not want to have a relationship in the dark, hiding from society because you you are just too afraid to lose your “reputation”
/r/MensRights31/07/21 08:40 AM
1

Our relationship is over. You have to accept it, sweetheart. Stalking me on reddit or going against our once common beliefs isn’t making that spark we had to burn again. You didn’t agree about coming out with our families, you wanted to continue our relationship whilst pretending to be straight. So sad
/r/MensRights29/07/21 09:35 PM
0

Oh my favourite stalker. I loved you, but now it’s over, you have to accept it
/r/MensRights28/07/21 08:20 PM
0

Oh, my favourite stalker. I loved you, but now it’s over, you have to accept it
/r/MensRights28/07/21 08:19 PM
0

Do you think that lying to cover up your wrong statements would work? Provide evidence
/r/MensRights28/07/21 12:21 AM
0

Do you think that lying to cover up your wrong statements would work? Provide evidence
/r/MensRights28/07/21 12:19 AM
0

Do you think that lying to cover up your wrong statements would work? Provide evidence
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:25 PM
0

Do you think that lying blatantly would work?
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:11 PM
1

You think that saying something wrong, being proved wrong, insulting me, accusing me, with no proof, just to escape from the shame to have lied is sufficient? You lied, provided no evidence, insulted me and made it personal just because you have no arguments. That’s it.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 09:09 PM
0

You think that saying something wrong, and after that, when proven wrong, insulting and bullying people in an effort to cover up would work?
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:14 PM
0

No. I just know one who is. Where is your evidence that women were not be punished in the past? Where is your evidence that you translated a textbook on criminal law hundreds of pages long in a few hours and understood it? Where is your evidence that what I provided you as evidence and that literally confirms verbatim what I said is wrong? Please, provide evidence. I am here and happy to check it
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:30 PM
0

Hahahahahahaha. It’s you the one lying. You haven’t provided any source, you lied when you said to have translated the most widespread textbook of Italian criminal law (more than 300 pages) just a small time after having received it, you lied when you said that the above publication (for which I even provided a link) does not clarify that before Enlightenment prisons as we know them now (ie places to be punished through detention) did not exist. And you are doing this just to hide the fact that …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:52 PM
0

Everything in the essay supports my statement that until Enlightenment punishment was not done by way of detention. Look, I got my theory: you are 16 yo, know nothing about the law and you take pleasure trolling on the internet. Have your life. I spent some time discussing the argument, but apart from fake accusations, fake facts and some creative bullshit you did not bring anything to the table. I hope for you that this is just a game you play out of boredom and you are not as ignorant as you s…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:57 PM
0

You are lying. You haven’t even read those sources, not even the first three, let alone translated them. I make your task easier, you moron: here a link to an article taken from the State Archive where they explain that until Enlightenment punishment was not done by putting people in prison to serve jail time, but were physically punished, which is what I have been saying all along. I also copy the first 2 pages, so that you, even if ignorant as a goat, can make an effort at google translating. …
/r/MensRights27/07/21 03:14 PM
0

No, I have sources in Italian because I work in Italy. You are lying blatantly on the articles I provided man. Google translate something to prove me wrong instead of shitting around
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:53 PM
0

Did you? So it means you speak Italian. Let’s go on in Italian then. In quale parte degli articoli che menzioni, viene detta una cosa diversa da quella che sostengo io? Please, answer in Italian since you speak it. Also, provide quotes of the above articles in which they say differently. Troll
/r/MensRights27/07/21 11:02 AM
0

Sources about the well know fact I mentioned are listed below. What are your sources, apart an inflated ego and a small knowledge? Ambroset S., Pisapia G. “Numero oscuro della devianza e questione criminale. Spunti teorici e verifica empirica”, Bertani, Verona, 1980 Antolisei F. “Manuale di diritto penale. Parte generale”, Giuffrè, Milano, 1997 Associazione Antigone “Il carcere trasparente. Primo Rapporto Nazionale sulle condizioni di detenzione”, Castelvecchi, Roma, 2000 Beccaria C. “Dei delitt…
/r/MensRights27/07/21 07:00 AM
0

You have that. Just do some research. It’s a well known fact. Do you want sources? I have many. People were not punished in prisons until Enlightenment in 18th century. You want sources? I have many and I am happy to provide you.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:09 PM
0

What about women not being punished because there were no female prisons in times in which people were not punished in prisons? Explain this, please. It’s your argument, after all. Please, let me bask in your superior understanding of legal history
/r/MensRights26/07/21 07:01 PM
0

Man, you just scroll up and read everything I said, put it all together without omitting anything, then connect your brain and you’ll see everything makes sense. Why trying to move the topic away from the blatant bullshit you wrote, that is that women were not punished for crimes in the 19th Century because there were no female prisons back then. Explain this, please, because its smell is so intense it’s attracting alien flies from outer space?
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:28 PM
0

If you quote only half of what I say, definitely yes.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 02:58 PM
1

Man, you keep decontextualising things trying to put words into my mouth. I said that prisons for the purposes of punishing crimes are a pretty recent thing and you picked up the first part only. You said that people were dying in the mud in 19th Century and I said no, they had it rough but there were trains and vaccines already. What did you do? You picked up the second part only. And so on and so on. And what about the original topic i.e. your argument that women didn’t go to jail in 19th Cent…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:22 AM
0

You haven’t. It’s all in the conversation above. And you haven’t given any evidence about your point, which is that women were not convicted for criminal charges in the past. Tell you something: rage is not a good counsellor.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:49 PM
0

No. That you said bullshit and tried to cover up when proven wrong. Read, understand, then try again.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:29 PM
0

Exactly my point. Prisons (the way you described them, ie as places to serve jail time) didn’t exist in the middle ages. Exactly my point. Thanks. Again, decontextualising things, copying and pasting etc. will take you nowhere. Besides, you haven’t commented on anything else than a misplaced concept of prison. Provide sources for your allegation that women were not punished if they committed crimes in the 19th Century, Mr no-vax
/r/MensRights25/07/21 07:26 PM
1

No. I am not saying prisons didn’t exist. I’m saying that prisons as a mean to punish crime are a relatively young concept. If you keep extrapolating a few words out of a complex reasoning, you get nowhere, because what I’m saying is not what you desperately try me to say. The prisons were there. They were however not used to punish crimes, so their existence is, as said since the beginning, totally irrelevant for the argument at stake. They served a totally different purpose, as said at length.…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:47 PM
0

You continue to fail to understand that prisons were used for reasons different than criminal repression until 1700. Let’s analyse your statement: you say that since prisons existed since the dawn of time while specific female prisons didn’t until way after the 19th Century, then in the 19th Century women were not sentenced jail time for criminal crimes the same way as men were in 19th Century. This is bullshit because: looking at prisons to infer that people were punished with jail time is stup…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:41 PM
0

The first female prison in Rome was founded in 1733 and was aimed at “those women whom in the law courts of either our Town of Rome and of the entire Ecclesiastic State are sentenced, as culprit of crimes, to detainment” (literally translated from the relevant piece of legislation). So, well before 19th Century, as soon as detention was introduced as the main way to punish crimes, women started to be detained alongside with men. The reason why this prison was founded, as explained in detail by t…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:50 AM
1

Again ignorance and the absurd attempt to decontextualise. Until some time after the end of the Middle Ages most crimes were punished with corporal penalties, not with jail time. Of course prisons existed also back to Rome, but they had a different purpose than that to punish the vast majority of crimes (which is the purpose they have nowadays). This topic, however, is completely irrelevant in respect of the argument, which is female detention in 19th Century. Females were detained, not in the s…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 06:49 AM
1

The difficult thing about talking with an ignorant person is that they don’t know what’s the difference between having studied something and having roamed the internet for some random and unrelated facts. Prisons are a pretty recent thing. In the middle ages, to make an example, they didn’t exist and punishment was inflicted on the body. The topic of prisons is a long and complex one, as before talking about prisons one should analyse how criminal law evolved in the first place. However, women w…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:32 AM
0

I guess I did read the laws, all of them, it’s part of my job 😂
/r/MensRights25/07/21 03:51 AM
0

Bro, I told you. Stay with your ideas. Of course conditions were harsh (even if people were not dying in mud as you say). The argument that since conditions were harsh for both genres then women were equal to men is plainly wrong because the legal system was giving men more rights than women. Laws have been written since a couple of centuries after the foundation of Rome, so it’s all written down and accessible to anybody who wants to read it. However, stay with your ideas, thanks to democracy y…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 03:04 AM
0

The vaccine against smallpox was discovered in the 18th century and vaccination commenced early in 19th century. Just to make an example. Anyway, stay with your opinion that women were not discriminated 200 years ago because men were living a bad life. It’s wrong, but I actually don’t care: people with these ideas are those who make me make more money in the end, so probably I should even thank you.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 03:33 PM
1

Man, there is no point in talking with you. Open a history book, read it, then come back. You have an idea of history which is totally nonsense. 200 years ago is 1821. There were trains, the US were already established and running, the industrial revolution already happened, factories etc. already there, middle class already existed and voting rights were not a prerogative of land owners since, as said, middle class was already created. 1821 was when Napoleon died. The general conditions of peop…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 06:08 AM
0

Bro, I guess you are winning the gold medal for utter ignorance of history and lack of logical thinking with the above. I guess you do it to try to provoke me and transform a civil discussion into a fight. This happens all the time in law courts when a party has no arguments, so I can relate. Or maybe you just want a fight. Well, you are not getting one. So, about your statements: The fact that only some men had good prospects while other didn’t is a proof that that society was generally unfair,…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 11:37 PM
0

My goodness. No, of course it is not my position that men dying in mud etc. had male privilege because they were ruled by a man. It is not my position because it is utterly stupid. This said, 200 years ago there was male privilege and its a fact: no vote to women, no free access to professions for women, cultural push on women to pursue marriage instead of higher education, certain civil law rules providing for husband’s right to control finances, estate and investments, limitations to divorce/s…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 09:05 AM
1

On this, I agree with you. What you mention is also an equal rights issue. Equality is both ways or it is not equality.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 08:14 PM
0

No. Of course. I’m sure if you take the time to read, you can understand what I said. Cheers
/r/MensRights22/07/21 08:11 PM
8

Thanks for your reply. I guess we agree on the substance. Just to clarify the details, I haven’t said men were “only” in power 200 years ago. I said that male privilege was there almost intact 200 years ago (with some notable exceptions, e.g. Queen Elizabeth I, XVI century, the founder of English dominance for centuries, undoubtedly a woman). Since then, male privilege has been eroded and now there is hardly any left. Now society and legal systems in democratic Countries do not have that anymore…
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:21 AM
25

Well, I have read many books about feminism and I have many female friends whom I would never flirt with. I perfectly know how to behave and I never flirted with a woman before making it super sure that she was into me as I was into her. Yet, the behaviour of society vis-à-vis men is different than the one society uses when dealing with women and it is a fact that women can be misandrist and get away with it while men are kept to way more strict rules of conduct. This is socially wrong as is cau…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:21 PM
1

This. Happened to me as well, exactly the same pattern + one child (hers). She told me she was dumping me the morning of my graduation day, 30 minutes before discussing my final essay. I got the news, discussed the essay with death in my heart, got my top marks cum laude, got out and invited her for lunch because I wanted an explanation and over lunch she told me she was pregnant of another guy. I got it badly, but managed to move on. Fast forward 3 years, she is divorcing, wants to see me again…
/r/MGTOW20/07/21 11:46 AM
8

I guess that, up to a certain extent, supporting a woman is just natural and, again up to a certain extent, also the right thing to do in a traditional relationship. The problem I see nowadays is that expectations on men are far beyond that “up to a certain extent” and, more importantly, women are not expected to bring anything to the table in exchange for levels of support which are plainly unreasonable. Also, we live in a world in which if a woman is at least average good looking and does not …
/r/MGTOW15/07/21 06:49 PM
16

It’s interesting how pornography is considered vital sexual education, but if in real life a guy treats a woman the way women are treated in pornography then it’s rape. Clown world, really. Anyway, as a father of a kid, I will ensure that my son will have the right education, whatever there clowns will say
/r/MGTOW07/07/21 01:31 PM
1

I am all into going our own way, but this is frankly too far. One thing is choosing for ourselves and taking decisions impacting our life (e.g. choosing to walk out of the plantation etc.), another is impacting on somebody else’s life (e.g. the woman and the fetus). This is clearly my personal position and I absolutely don’t want to teach morals to anybody, but in my view there are better ways to avoid having a child than poisoning the mother to induce an abortion. From a more objective perspect…
/r/MGTOW25/06/21 08:04 AM
5

Same here. I am not into married women for a number of reasons. However, what’s incredibly shocking to me is when they do not say they are married and you discover it afterwards by chance. Most funny episode that happened to me was this chick whom I was hooking up with. One day she was riding me on my bed and got a call. Well, she said something like “oh darling, I’m sorry you are having a bad day at work, I will cook you something special for dinner to cheer you up”. That’s when I learned she w…
/r/MGTOW21/06/21 11:48 AM
10

Women are women. The moment you give them a child, they are not interested in your genes anymore, since they got those genes already. They already have a child with you, so no need for more genes from you. So they want you to be a provider. To provide for the children they gave birth to. At that point, you start to compete with any other man about providing and we all know that in a big world there’s always a better provider. I’ve dated many single moms after my (childless) divorce and they all …
/r/Divorce_Men20/06/21 07:11 PM
3

Oh, I can so much relate to this. It’s Asian mentality combined with the get rich imperative governing China’s new middle class generations these days. I guess our combined experience with Asian ladies could give a nice blow to the Waifu / submissive Asian woman dream so many men in the West are still entertaining. My current (soon to be ex) gf is now trying to uphold that since she is a student and I am already settled, I should take care of her expenses, since she is the beautiful flower addin…
/r/MGTOW16/06/21 08:52 PM
4

My experience as well. Young women there are entitled af and accustomed to losing control over petty things. Just to give the flavour: one of my Chinese exes got wild and batshit crazy because I changed my whatsapp pic with one of me sitting on a bench at the park. Reason why? It was not a selfie so another woman must have taken it and as a consequence I am a cheater and a monster. She called me like 60 times in a row in her fury. It literally took me to temporarily block her to keep my mobile a…
/r/MGTOW16/06/21 05:07 PM
2

I went through the article. If what reported there is true (which I doubt: the press nowadays is never objective and looks for the sensational), in my Country (I live in the EU in a culturally Latin Country) she would be facing a trial for instigation to commit murder, which is a serious crime here. This said, I can’t believe the US academic environment became so illiterate as to believe the very concept of race does exist. Technically speaking, all humans are alike from a genetic perspective, i…
/r/MGTOW05/06/21 09:05 PM
15

I am a lawyer and I live in Western Europe (Italy actually). I guess OP is not from Italy as a prenup only works for civil law relationship (a sort of half marriage) and not for fully fledged marriage. However, if OP is living in Western Europe in a civil law (as opposed to common law) Country then for what I read he is 100% safe. Also, he lawyered up. This said, showing real wealth is always not recommended, because it exasperates the woman and makes her even more crazy, but I understand where …
/r/MGTOW02/06/21 07:23 PM
2

Yes, really. Any move at this point will carry consequences forever. It’s not about having the money, it’s about not losing it. The way the law sees things is utterly different than the way people see it. Look, I am a lawyer myself (business lawyer, not family law lawyer) and the best move I made in my divorce was hiring a family law lawyer. Even as a lawyer, I didn’t grasp the subtleties of family law and was on the verge of being screwed up really badly. My family law lawyer gave me sound advi…
/r/Divorce_Men01/06/21 09:45 PM
3

I’m a lawyer myself. In my view 1k is not overpriced. You don’t pay the lawyer’s time, but the lawyer’s experience. There are times in which spending in legal advice is an actual investment as it saves money and bigger troubles in the end.
/r/MGTOW24/05/21 10:38 AM
12

This is genius. Fucking genius. Feminists should build a statue to people going their own way. We remove their alleged problem while pursuing our goals. Everybody happy and win win scenario. So why the ladies are not happy with that? Maybe because MGTOW = AtmGTOW?
/r/MGTOW03/04/21 07:23 PM
3

My 2 cents is that Tinder is long gone already for sensible (ie red pilled) men. This piece of news is just the tombstone on an app that has taken the decision to run after validation needing ladies instead than providing a platform for adults willing to consensually hook up. I guess I am just sitting on my living room and wait all this nonsense to pass by. Sure enough if Tinder gets woke and evolves into some platform populated by woke women and their orbiters only, women will look out for anot…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/21 09:20 PM
2

Thanks bro. Very very much appreciated
/r/MGTOW15/01/21 08:10 AM
2

I am not legally married (so, no alimony if we separate), but I have a child with my de facto wife. I pay more than the child support I would be sentenced to pay in court (I am a lawyer so I made my legal analysis), but I see it as the cost for raising my child and be in his life on a day to day basis, so I am fine with it. I am certain that this is the only reason why the lady is not contemplating divorce and reluctantly accepts my presence in the house and my (few) mandatory rules. Of course, …
/r/MGTOW14/01/21 01:38 PM
1

I totally agree. Thanks bro
/r/TheRedPill11/01/21 01:19 AM
2

I relate. And I thank you for this. My son is the brightest person I ever met. He is oppositive, he makes a fuss anytime more than 2 people are involved, he struggles whenever he is put into a social situation. But he is strong, super intelligent and he wants to know. And I love him. Maybe this pandemic is going to change social interactions in a way that people with autism will find more easy to cope with. I would be fine with it. There is more in people than their social skills. There is a tre…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/21 09:34 PM
1

Then fuck women and stay ignorant. My son is autistic. I know autism inside out and backwards. Calling a person autistic in that way is dispregiative. Fucking women is fucking easy. It is not a medal of honour. Raising children in this world, raising a male child in this crazy storm of gender craziness is difficult. Especially when you happen to have a male child with autism. And since autism is way more common in males than in females, then yes: autism is a male problem. So, instead then focuss…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/21 09:15 PM
3

I don’t think autistic is the correct word. I can see the point, but the tone is dispregiative and the use of the word has implications beyond the point. So, no, it is not the correct word.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 09:30 AM
4

Yes I am latin and I am from Italy. Not that underdeveloped Country, since you are asking. I see that irony is dead here. However: you guys cannot say the n word, because *respect but you consider socially acceptable to use autism as an insult. To be more clear: I have an autistic child and the way you use the word is offensive. PS For some reasons I replied to a different post on a different thread and my comment showed up here. Thanks for the upvotes. It must be that at 51 I should not use the…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 08:40 AM
-60

What I find it incredible is that you white gringos can’t say the n word but you can use the word autistic as an offence. Probably this is one of the reasons your society is collapsing so badly.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 12:27 AM
2

Lawyer and I can confirm. People do this all the time. Many of them do not grasp the concept that living close to each other implies some basic compromising. My 2 cents is that this guy or lady is living in solitude, no goals achieved and a wasted life to face. It takes a solid person to face this, but a solid person would never let her/himself reach this low. I am probably lucky not to live in communist Amerika, because where I live the issue is mostly the other way round, ie people complaining…
/r/MGTOW17/11/20 10:39 PM
1

Come on bro :) Let’s talk about the Egyptians instead. I checked out your point about the more you go back in time and the whiter they were and got supporting evidence. It is something I didn’t know and I thank you for this. It’s fascinating because it seems that the change happened during the Pharaohs era, so it was not due to invasions etc.
/r/MGTOW12/09/20 06:58 AM
3

The Romans, at least those of the origins (republican period and early empire) had olive complexion, dark hair and brown eyes, as you can easily see if you look at the paintings of that period. Then, as they expanded, they mixed with different ethnicities and became a truly multi-ethnic society. This is not the point, however. I used /s, but it seems it went unseen. What I am saying (obviously still using /s) is that white means absolutely nothing if not connected to a culture. When people say w…
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 11:32 AM
5

The Roman Empire was latin, so brown, not white. Don’t take us descendants of the Roman Empire down the drain with you Anglo-Saxon gringos. We don’t have this self hate you guys seem to have lately /s And I repeat: /s
/r/MGTOW10/09/20 08:32 PM
2

I want to have a jealous FWB who will let me do what I want but who will be so much jealous that he will give me anything and let me do anything just to be with me. They call that narcissism.
/r/MGTOW03/09/20 08:48 PM
2

Typical asian woman’s perspective. Had first hand exposure to this mentality myself. First thing they ask you is whether you have your own house or apartment and what’s your job. Society there is pretty materialistic and the concept of romantic love is not the driver for a marriage, which is basically about resources and lifestyle. One of the many reasons for this is also that there is no social security system in place, so that parents depend on their offspring when they age. This explains the …
/r/MGTOW26/08/20 10:00 PM
1

This. Also, it seems to me that this type of arguments i.e. those about trying to find white male privilege everywhere are silly also from a different perspective. I will make a provocative example here, just as a way to point at my argument (yeah yeah reality is more nuanced than my example, of course). Christopher Columbus is now criminalised as a symbol of white supremacy etc. Now, the funny fact is that Columbus is named a white man, while he was either Spanish or Italian (his true nationali…
/r/MensRights24/08/20 09:39 AM
1

Apparently I got automatically banned from FDS (where I posted once on a no controversial topic) because I posted here. I am antifa at the core. I can’t stand fascism. Sorry bros but I am out of this. Truth and search of truth can’t stand fascist barriers. Thanks for hosting my post.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/20 09:22 PM
1

Yeah I was confirming your translation. English is not my native language so apologies for any misunderstanding. Cheers bro
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/20 08:59 PM
2

It means “badly fucked woman”, literally. It goes along the narrative that a woman who gets bad sex (or no sex at all) is bitter and therefore angry at life. Basically, the same that women imply when they call a man an incel. Guess why in a supposedly woke world calling a woman “una mal follada” is a sexist insult while calling a man an “incel” is a judgement pointing at this man’s failures. Anyways
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/20 08:49 PM
2

Thanks bro. Everyone, regardless of gender, is really free to choose and I do respect your choice because to me it is a manifestation of freedom and shows a man who has a direction and is in charge of his life, which is what I like most about the MGTOW philosophy. When the young woman I was hanging out with got pregnant (yeah yeah, old story of saying she was on the pill while she actually wasn’t) she was decent enough to say that keeping the baby or not was a joint choice, so I was in front of …
/r/MGTOW10/08/20 10:13 PM
2

My 2 cents is that she had some genuine interest in you, but something got lost in translation ie you did not notice she was with the waiter and made a too direct and open move. Probably we will never know if she did that just for validation or because she was also making a thought about some action, but who cares? In my view, you did right: your interest was mild, you easily talked yourself out of the situation and went on with your business anyway. Also, if the boyfriend is not totally stupid …
/r/MGTOW09/08/20 10:30 PM
1

Genesis, literally. Cddx DG ghygoj
/r/MGTOW06/08/20 10:36 PM
1

This. Same here. Youngsters see the world as it is and they question everything so feminist indoctrination does not work. Also, they have access to the internet so they always have another source of info than their indoctrinated teacher. Indoctrination never worked before the digital age, it is not going to work now either. Unfairness never works because those being treated unfairly know they are treated as such. My educated guess is that the vast majority of people know that men are treated unf…
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 09:29 PM
2

Hahahahahaha. Billions of women in the world. No prob being swiped left. For one who swipes a veteran left there are 50 swiping right and getting all wet in the process. Also, let’s be serious: this is not the attitude of your average chick. This is the attitude of a delusional person who makes a political stance in a dating arena. Dating is dating and politics are politics. It’s like going to a party dressed up in full combat gear. Wrong dress code, I would say. Anyway, let’s steer a good berth…
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 10:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter