TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YM_Industries Archive

View 10 posts and 264 comments by YM_Industries on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The only reason anyone found out about this Cardi B stuff is because she proudly admitted to drugging and stealing from men. Her account is the sole account of the crime. She states that she did not rape the men. So the claim that she didn't rape anyone comes from the exact same source as the claim that she drugged and stole from them. The theory that she raped men was completely fabricated. She never said it, and people just made it up out of thin air. There's no evidence to support it. I thoug…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:59 PM
-4

Cardi B didn't rape anyone. She enticed men with the promise of sex, then drugged them and robbed them. She didn't have sex with them. Cardi B isn't a rapist. Stealing from people is wrong, as is drugging people. Cardi B undoubtedly a bad person. But not a rapist. The willingness of the MR community to spread long-disproven misinformation is why the movement has such a bad reputation.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 11:02 AM
5

Is there an archive of the tweet?
/r/MensRights09/08/20 08:30 AM
6

Usually I support people's right to describe their gender as they wish, but non-binary man is logically oxymoronic. Non-binary AMAB would be less confusing.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 03:45 PM
1

Oh I'd forgotten about the Firewatch PewDiePie thing. Didn't hear about the Subnautica one.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:40 AM
-4

gotten themselves into shit for trying to pander to feminists Firewatch [...] Subnautica What do you mean? Both games were successful, critically aclaimed (if you trust game 'journalists') and lived up to their hype. I've played both and really enjoyed both. Additionally, neither game comes across as particularly feminist. I've participated in gamergate myself, I don't like politics being shoehorned where they don't belong. But I think you picked the two worst examples possible.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 03:01 PM
63

Is there a source that isn't The Sun?
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:34 PM
2

Oh I thought you were disagreeing with me.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:48 AM
2

The comic doesn't suggest denying it for women, or at least that's not how I read it. It's saying if women should have body autonomy (which I strongly believe) then so should men (which I also believe). Given that this comic equates the two, I really don't think Stonetoss is saying otherwise.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:21 AM
16

The comic isn't saying anti-abortion is good and circumcision is bad. The comic is saying if anti-abortion is bad them circumcision is also bad. The comic would be meaningless without the first part since the whole point of it is pointing out hypocrisy. That said, it wouldn't surprise me if stonetoss is anti-abortion and fuck that guy.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:38 AM
0

We were saying wait for proof though. Is your argument that they did it, so we should be able to ads well? Because we said it was wrong when they did it, so in my mind that makes it wrong for us to do it as well. Do you really want to be as bad as them?
/r/MensRights24/03/19 02:59 AM
-5

In that case, this post is shamefully hypocritical.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 06:27 AM
33

Has the proof been released? Last I checked Depp's lawyers were claiming there was proof but hadn't produced it.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 05:20 AM
1

Hey, Vegemite sandwiches are pretty good if you put Kraft Singles in as well.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:25 AM
1

For sure. She's still wrong, just not as hateful as people are making her out to be.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:40 AM
0

Dismissing an argument because of whom it comes from instead of based on merit is identity politics. You have become that which you despise.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:37 AM
1

Hey, I'm a long time /r/MR subscriber (been subbed for as long as you've had your account). I'm certainly not a shill, although I've been called a Russian bot numerous times. Please read and seriously think about the following two paragraphs. You know /r/MenKampf? The subreddit where they take misandristic comments and replace 'men' with 'jews' to demonstrate hypocrisy and double standards? And there are feminists who completely miss the point and think that the people behind /r/MenKampf are ant…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:20 AM
0

It's not sarcasm. It's a comparison, like /r/MenKampf is. This subreddit needs to do some serious introspection.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:15 AM
2

Seems to me that you like having money more than you like being a man.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:34 AM
10

Yeah I agree, I arrived too late and the joke is already dead. Why are you still here though? It's over, go home.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:43 PM
24

hUh!
/r/MensRights26/01/19 05:00 AM
2

I don't think entertainment has to have a deep message or a political agenda. Spiderverse was fun and I loved it. The pacing and the art-style were both amazing, and really represent what can be done with the medium of film. It's the most fun I've had watching a movie that wasn't directed by Edgar Wright.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:51 PM
15

And Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse, which was legitimately amazing. EDIT: Nvm, Spiderverse was nominated as well.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:35 PM
7

No worries. "/s" is meant to indicate sarcasm, but it's sometimes also used to indicate facetiousism or irony.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:54 AM
20

She didn't say that, she said "women have always been the primary victims of war" in 1998. The commenter above is being facetious, and has included a /s to indicate this.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:39 AM
349

banned from the anarchy subreddit Wew
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:05 PM
3

Are you okay? I hope you aren't suicidal anymore. No matter what they say, you have value. Look after yourself OP. If you want to talk to a stranger about anything, feel free to PM me. I have done suicide intervention training, for what it's worth.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:47 PM
4

Yeah, a big part of why I'm here is because I'm against Fear Culture. It's irrational for women to be scared to walk alone, because men are more likely to be victims of violent crime. Children are taught 'stranger danger', while the majority of kidnappings are done by someone the victim knew. Fear Culture prevents people from meeting new friends and having fun. IIRC we're living in the safest time since we started recording crime rates, but with the 24 hour news cycle you wouldn't know it. Peopl…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:57 PM
6

They do care when a man has a criminal record Not always. There are always people who will look past crimes or unethical behaviour. I mean, Chris Brown is still a popular artist even after beating the shit out of Rihanna. If people will buy it, people will sell it.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:04 AM
4

Ignore the list, it's powerless.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 07:28 AM
11

I don't trust this source and the stats make no sense. Only 50% of men want to further their career??? This isn't believable in the slightest.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:11 PM
9

It doesn't matter. The person who laced them shouldn't have laced them. That's all the comment was saying.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:53 PM
8

Yeah, but the person who laced them did.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:12 AM
-4

Edgy
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:12 AM
5

That's a weird system. In Australia we accrue Annual Leave throughout the year. If we accrue too much the company has to pay us out for it.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:23 PM
4

Instead of saying "Mansplaining Explained" it should say "Mansplaining Femsplained".
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:50 AM
10

If an organisation says something that's in their interests, it's suspect. If they say something that isn't in their best interests, they're probably being honest.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 10:28 AM
31

They started their comment with a # and if you don't escape it that makes everything after it into a title.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:26 PM
5

It's because the post links to an image that's very low resolution.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 08:26 PM
3

Got an article on that? Sounds interesting.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:15 AM
13

They actually misspelled the title, it's meant to say "exposing her-ass-ment".
/r/MensRights31/10/17 05:23 AM
3

Smack My Bitch Up was right.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 10:33 AM
16

50 shades of grey has a predominantly female fanbase
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:56 AM
8

FR ATTTISaI?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:50 PM
9

Taking the Christ out of Christhallelujah
/r/MensRights12/07/17 07:54 AM
7

Yeah, I've spoken to more than one woman who doesn't understand how a man could be sexually assaulted by a woman. Or how a man could involuntarily get an erection. I think that's the real rape culture.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 01:59 AM
1

Worth reading MSP's stuff, he's pretty entertaining.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:41 AM
4

Here's an anecdote from an oil industry worker about women in the industry: https://www.reddit.com/r/MexicanSpaceProgram/comments/50li3l/nsfw_reality_vs_equal_opportunities_or_the/
/r/MensRights18/11/16 12:48 AM
22

I might boycott it, except I've never even heard of it before. I thought we only had two cinema chains in Aus.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 09:05 AM
1

In the game This Is The Police you are sometimes ordered by the mayor to meet quotes, such as at least 50% of your police force must be women. There's no way to meet them other than to fire half of your male force.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:54 AM
5

I wouldn't want them to say untrue things even if it were an attempt to defend me If you were guilty you might.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 12:10 PM
1

Girls doing maths is slightly more plausible, but is there a stereotype about boys not being able to throw?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 12:54 PM
1

Nice work getting this stuff taken down, OP. Just wondering, anyone know how the hell either of these could be considered sexist? John can't throw well Sally is bad at Math
/r/MensRights18/05/16 07:36 AM
2

I think I misunderstood.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 09:05 PM
-3

No and nor should they be. Freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 08:19 AM
10

As someone not from the US I disagree strongly. Australia has only 0.125% of its population in prison compared to the US's 0.737%, and Australia still has a low crime rate. The prison situation in the US is absurd to an outsider. (Privatised prisons!?)
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:55 PM
11

Yeah if the US has 25% of the world's prisoners and 30% of the world's female prisoners then that means the US must have <25% of the world's male prisoners. Which means that when compared to the global scale, the US prison population has an elevated ratio of female to male prisoners. Of course this statistic is very misleading, considering that 93.3% of inmates in the US are men, but it does suggest that in other countries the prison population is significantly more than 93.3% male.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:17 PM
12

The US has 5% of the world's population and 25% of the world's prisoners. (According to In A Nutshell at 4:14). Assuming both statistics are correct then this would mean that the US imprison's women over men at a disproportionately high rate when compared with the rest of the world. Does that just mean the /r/PussyPass elsewhere is even stronger, or is there another reason?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 10:45 AM
1

Yeah maybe, but then I'd never heard of NeW so that would've meant nothing to me.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:29 AM
3

Oh yeah I have no issue with the article, it's just that the Reddit title says "even Forbes agrees!" as if Forbes is some gold standard of truth.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:17 AM
16

Forbes isn't that reliable anymore, it's basically just another blogging site.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:18 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4agwup/student_who_was_falsely_accused_of_rape_by/
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:38 AM
1

Solid post OP, I'll be using a lot of these points when I talk with feminist friends. Any chance you could make my life super easy and provide some sources? Preferably from publications that can't be immediately dismissed as right wing propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:18 AM
1

Okay that's cool, not as bad as people are making it out to be.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:37 PM
2

Isn't she contractually required to make more music with Dr Luke though? Or is it just that she can't make more music except with Dr Luke?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:13 PM
1

So given that Kesha's contract injunction plea has been denied, what happens next? I don't want to draw conclusions until everything has settled, what's Kesha's next move?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:25 AM
2

Yeah, RooshV is from "Return of Kings" and I think their name says everything you need to know about their ideology.
/r/PussyPass17/12/15 05:43 AM
6

Isn't RooshV openly anti-MRA though?
/r/PussyPass17/12/15 04:38 AM
35

I believe dontneedfeminism on Tumblr posted a huge list of them a few months back. Unfortunately I'm finding it nearly impossible to scroll through their recent wall of islamophibic posts to find it.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:52 PM
3

"But what about teh womenz???"
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:36 PM
7

Yeah, the mod team here is awesome.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:37 PM
1

How long ago did she start filming!?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:40 AM
1

I hope so.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:51 AM
4

It's not directly about whether I back it or not. It's about whether I will recommend it to my friends when it's out and help it spread. With this title, doing so will make me uncomfortable unless the movie does a very good job of explaining it. And if I'm not going to spread the movie around when it's out then I probably won't financially support the movie at this stage. I can't get the creator to change the name of the movie, much like I can't get Intel to stop supporting Anita Sarkeesian. But…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:00 AM
11

I don't think calling the movie "The Red Pill" generates any more controversy than could be generated by a less misleading name. This will generate confusion and reinforce the arguments of people who call us misogynists. Remember when Mad Max came out and all the trashy online magazines said "MRAs are trying to boycott Fury Road"? I spoke to two different people that I know IRL who believed these headlines and because of them thought our movement was petty and stupid. But it wasn't us that tried…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:49 AM
29

I want to get behind this movie but I feel that the name is such a huge mistake. We already have problems because people think MRM==TRP, we often get ridiculed for things that Roosh says. If the mainstream representation of our movement that we support perpetuates this confusion then it will only cause more problems.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:26 AM
18

Because spanking sounds more erotic and less violent.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:31 PM
1

Ah okay, I thought the law had been passed. Thanks for the correction!
/r/MensRights15/10/15 04:06 AM
1

I was under the impression that women couldn't be recognised as rapists in NZ. Could be wrong there though, will look into it when I get home from work.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:08 AM
1

In rape cases its guilty until proven innocent rather than the other way around. Also I vaguely remember reading that they won't count female perpetrators as rapists, only as sexual assaulters, but I could be thinking of another country there.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:15 PM
9

New Zealand seems worse.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:56 AM
1

Very well put, I think I'll steal this one.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:27 PM
3

See /r/WikiInAction.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:28 AM
21

Hey, I know feminists are nice people, a lot of my friends are feminists and I respect their views. You're deflecting what I said though, which is that feminism as a movement has not improved anything for men that has not also improved things for women. If you disagree with this then it should be easy to disprove, just give me an example.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:45 AM
18

Talk is cheap. Feminists always claim they help men too, but I have rarely if ever seen this in action. The only cases I've seen of feminism helping men was as a by-product of helping women.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:30 AM
22

Any idea what movement they identify as belonging to? Did they mention it all? I'm wondering if this is a case of feminists actually doing something positive for men, or if they're egalitarian or MRA or something else. Massive props to them whatever the answer is!
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:15 AM
203

Tbh I don't really see this as a Men's Rights issue. The reason the headline is "where grown men cry" is because it's more shocking than women crying. Yes, this is because men are expected to be stronger by society, but the article is not shaming the men for crying. The article is highlighting how bad the working conditions are that they cause men to cry. You know how whenever feminists see anything gendered they try to frame it as somehow oppressing women so that it neatly fits into their world…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:32 AM
1

Not a clue, I found that conversation in a comment higher up. It's worth noting that the whole thing is unconfirmed, but I don't think it's at all far-fetched.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:23 PM
17

It's definitely unconfirmed. Trust, but verify. I don't see the timing as unrealistic at all though.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:19 AM
10

1) obviously Not necessarily
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:41 AM
6

Of course he was. You don't go zero to that crazy in just one gear. It would appear you are not correct.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:41 AM
92

Holy shit, it's even worse with context.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:40 AM
1

I made it by talking about how I stopped watching the Yogscast out of disappointment regarding their attitude to disclosing sponsored content: https://www.reddit.com/r/kotakuinaction/comments/3ejxl3/who_did_you_follow_or_admire_before_the_gamergate/ctfs5to
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:06 AM
2

Slow down!
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:00 AM
1

That means a lot to me, thanks. :)
/r/PussyPass09/07/15 10:59 AM
12

But the thing is, it's not men vs women here. It's obviously more complex than just two teams, but a closer representation would be SJWs vs MRAs. Women who exploit white knights are immoral. White knights who enable exploiters are stupid. IIRC one of the moderators here is a woman, and a decent amount of the users are too. "We" does not refer to guys, it refers to those against benevolent sexism.
/r/PussyPass09/07/15 06:05 AM
6

But how do they compare to a child with 2 parents?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:34 AM
3

Just to clarify a bit, you were not banned for your "Doesn't matter, got jeans" comment. You were shadow banned at some point in the past by the Reddit admins. Shadow bans mean that by default only moderators can see your comments, the moderators of /r/MensRights are friendly and will make your comment visible to everyone and warn you that you're shadowbanned. Neither /u/EvilPundit or the other /r/MensRights mods are responsible for your ban, and they are physically unable to reverse it.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 12:48 PM
6

It took me a while to edit this image, even with the help of the Status Snapper Chrome extension. I hope people find it interesting! Please let me know if I've used the wrong flair.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:47 AM
3

Why is it called a 'women's room' if it's also for agender people and FtM trans-sexuals? Isn't that a bit insensitive? Why is feminism named after females? Wouldn't that imply it's not a real equality movement?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:02 PM
3

It was a different story.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:10 PM
-1

/r/titlegore
/r/PussyPass06/05/15 07:49 AM
2

Cheers!
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:42 AM
4

Ah, thanks for the explanation. Is there an article about the registrar difficulties?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:17 AM
4

what's the difference between archive.is and archive.today?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:12 AM
20

He isn't suing her, he's suing the university. Hopefully this will give him more of a chance at success.
/r/PussyPass25/04/15 12:22 PM
6

I found a couple of articles about it: http://www.newsweek.com/psychology-humans-will-justify-almost-anything-101951 http://www.practicalwellbeing.co.uk/is-what-you-believe-out-of-date/ They actually look like really good examples, thanks for telling us about that.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 02:27 AM
6

Silverguson?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:11 AM
1

I'm sorry, I think I worded that poorly. I know that there are plenty of women in the MRA. But we don't fight for women's rights or issues, and nor should we. We have a clear purpose, there in our name, and that isn't part of it. But women do still have some sexism issues that face them in today's society, and they should expect a movement to help them with those. But if we keep telling everyone that feminism is abusing the system and lying then we need to offer an alternative for people who are…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:14 PM
1

Oh for sure. MR definitely has its place, but if people ask "well if Feminism is bad and Men's Rights is just for men, where should I go for women's issues" and I believe the answer to that is egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:20 PM
2

And egalitarianism aims to be a movement that pushes for general equality, both sexes, all races, all sexual orientations, etc...
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:15 AM
2

Except for it wasn't removed. Removed posts don't show up in subreddit searches. You got downvoted because people didn't find it interesting. While /r/videos is MR-friendly and anti-SJW, it's a mostly lighthearted subreddit. You weren't censored, subscribers just weren't interested in watching a 5:55 video about feminism being debunked. Going off on wild conspiracy theories about mods stalking you isn't helpful, especially when we have proof of ACTUAL conspiracies going on such as the #ModTalkLe…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:14 AM
12

The coffee was served at an irresponsibly hot temperature. Coffee is meant to be served hot, yes, but it's not meant to be above boiling. If she had spilled coffee on herself and mildly burnt herself then I'd agree with you, but to get 3rd degree burns is ridiculous.
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 09:45 AM
13

Plus the woman only sued McDonalds for $10,000, enough to cover her medical expenses. McDonalds offered $800 settlement, which she refused, and the judge was pissed at them and slapped them with $2 million. I hardly think that asking McDonalds to pay your medical bill for an accident they had a significant part in is unreasonable.
/r/PussyPass25/03/15 07:57 AM
2

That's actually a pretty interesting argument. I feel that in my mind the concepts of long term relationships and marriage are tied together. I'm going to have to think about it for a while before I can untangle the two. Thanks for providing me with some food for thought.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:01 AM
-4

I find that mentality to be scarily similar to the SJW's M&Ms analogy. The women who do this sort of thing are a minority. Plus, when we see these articles the man has almost always made very poor decisions leading up to it. It's obviously not the man's fault, but there are things that can be done as men to drastically reduce the risk of anything like this happening. Sort of like how if a woman is wearing skimpy clothing it's not her fault if she gets assaulted, but wearing more conservative clo…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:39 PM
46

Yeah, as we've learned thanks to #ModTalkLeaks, all the defaults except /r/videos are owned and operated by SRS or SJWs.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:41 PM
4

Probably why it's flaired as 'Humor'. :P
/r/PussyPass18/03/15 11:02 PM
2

Mrs Incredible's name is Helen Parr?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:16 AM
1

Cya!
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:47 AM
1

I think I congratulated nicemod on at least two occasions, but I'm not surprised (or offended) you don't remember me because this is a pretty popular subreddit and I'm sure you have hundreds of interactions each day. Congrats on consistently being my favourite moderator, even across accounts.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:42 AM
1

Oh you're the same person? What a coincidence! You're definitely my favourite mod then. Do you remember me telling you that previously?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:37 AM
1

I'm unfamiliar with all the lore behind /r/MR, what happened?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:25 AM
2

No worries man, you're a cool mod. I think /u/nicemod is still my favourite though. :P I can imagine it's difficult to moderate a controversial subreddit like this. You got it, if I see one I'll let you know. (Indirectly, via the report button)
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:14 AM
3

The moderation on this subreddit is fantastic, you allowed him to keep having a conversation even though you don't agree with what he was saying but as soon as he resorts to insults/personal attacks then down comes the banhammer. Keep up the good work, friend.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:05 AM
3

Link? I missed it completely.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:01 AM
16

Wait, the Gates foundation are encouraging circumcision? That's a shame, I thought they were some of the good guys.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:15 AM
1

Sorry to hear you aren't used to people being kind to you.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:43 PM
1

This is Reddit, we're all pedantic bastards. Your mistake doesn't make your point any less valid, and the meaning of your title is still perfectly clear. You have hundreds of upvotes, which means hundreds of people agree with you.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:30 AM
5

Hey dude, I strongly recommend you take the channels suggested in order to get your situation sorted out, but in the meantime you don't want to fall further behind. You're clearly a bright kid considering you're doing the subject accelerated, take a look at Khan Academy for some self-paced online learning. If you have any questions, please flick me a PM. I program for a living and would be happy to help someone in your situation Good luck mate.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:24 AM
1

I wouldn't worry about it too much, happens to us all.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:18 AM
1

Can't edit titles, can only edit comments and text post contents.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:45 AM
11

I'm as anti-againstmensrights as you are, but if someone came onto one of my subreddits and said something completely against the purpose of the subreddit, I'd ban them too. Subreddits exist to allow people to find information they are interested in, if they are interested in tiny echo chambers then that's their choice. Forcing our ideologies into their "safe-spaces" makes us look bad.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 11:22 AM
10

I haven't shared this before because I think Men's Rights has better things to do than say "haha look at how dumb the feminazis are" but againstmensrights really don't like their echo chamber being disrupted. Ninja-edit: I didn't go looking for trouble, the post got featured on /r/MistyFront, an awesome subreddit for discovering new subreddits. It's very similar to /r/Serendipity, you should check it out.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 11:18 AM
1

Care to share?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:32 AM
2

I had a try at it: "School sued for publicly accusing 5 students of illegal activity states that 'the school does not comment on legal issues'"
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:13 AM
4

When you submit to /r/nottheonion you have to use the headline as your post title, so unfortunately this wouldn't do well there.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:11 AM
1

It's spelled 'perjury'.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:20 PM
3

That link's broken.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:48 AM
1

It's not the exact same comment chain, but it's got all the links: https://archive.today/fO1jx
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:57 PM
7

Use archive.today like /r/KotakuInAction does for everything.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:22 PM
4

It has to be said, /u/nicemod is pretty amazing. Every interaction I have had with them has been positive.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:50 AM
7

It's not like he was accused by his wife, she's defending him. This could happen to any man. Clearly logic doesn't work as a good enough defense, so I don't think being gay would save you.
/r/PussyPass06/01/15 04:12 AM
23

Also maybe that the guy shouldn't have left it where he left it? Victim blaming? :P
/r/PussyPass24/12/14 07:30 AM
22

In mitigation defence barrister Francis McGrath stressed it was a “theft by finding” rather from a person and said: “This was giving temptation to finders keepers and not looking a gift horse in the mouth.” WTF does this mean? She went to the bank and snatched a bag containing 9,000 pounds. Nothing about that is finding, that's a very deliberate act of theft.
/r/PussyPass24/12/14 01:07 AM
6

Male clothing too.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:12 AM
-4

Well the subreddit does have a link to /r/TheRedPill in the sidebar. But I left /r/TheBluePill because it was becoming /r/Feminism, I don't want to have to leave /r/PussyPass because it becomes /r/TheRedPill.
/r/PussyPass27/11/14 06:04 AM
3

I don't subscribe to the red pill worldview, but this does sound like a blue pill story. A girl was a dick to you and you let her be. Pussy pass is for stories about either the general public or the legal system excusing women for behavior that a man would not have been excused from. This story does not fit those criteria.
/r/PussyPass27/11/14 03:41 AM
7

Oh god, do we really have to let /r/TheRedPill leak into /r/PussyPass?
/r/PussyPass27/11/14 03:28 AM
0

It mentions in the article that she walked through Paramatta. I don't know what Harlem is like, but it sounds like they are comparable.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:28 AM
-6

Maybe Shadenfreude doesn't make you a woman-hater, but I would also definitely not say that it's something to be proud of. You sound like you're looking for some kind of revolution, which is simply not going to happen. We're making progress by raising awareness about sides of issues that were previously not considered. We're starting to get some positive press coverage and we've even made some changes to legislation. We're looking for social reform, not war.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:03 AM
6

I want to fight for a society that is equally fair, not equally unfair. I acknowledge that this particular area of law has most likely negatively affected more men than women, but the solution to this isn't to make the situation worse for women. The solution is to make it better for everyone. Remember, we're not fighting against women's rights, we're fighting for men's rights. Our goal is to push men forwards, not pull women backwards.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:21 AM
31

I smile whenever I see woman finding themselves in the unfair position that countless men have been trapped in. Why? There's a huge Us vs. Them mentality in the MR community. Yes it's unfair that men are so often trapped by child support laws, but if our response is to laugh at the women that are also suffering then we deserve our reputation as women-haters. Anybody can be a victim of the flawed legal system, and we need to work WITH each other. Our enemy is not women, it is inequality. Enjoying…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:23 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:20 AM
4

Holy crap, thanks for that link. It's nice to finally have a source for this kind of stuff, and that document so obviously highlights why the statistics are wrong. Interesting parts: Nearly 1 in 5 women (18.3%) and 1 in 71 men (1.4%) in the United States have been raped at some time in their lives, including completed forced penetration, attempted forced penetration, or alcohol/drug facilitated completed penetration. [...] Approximately 1 in 21 men (4.8%) reported that they were made to penetrat…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 11:09 AM
23

Two words: White knights.
/r/PussyPass07/10/14 06:51 AM
13

I know the candle is probably meant to be 'shining a light on the truth' or something, but combined with the ye olde font and the pentagraM written in blood it actually makes it seem like propaganda for a cult. Plus I agree with /u/Sonols, this is trying to discredit the feminist movement by cherry picking their achievements. I liked AVfM but it seems he's going a bit hardcore (and stupid) these days.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 11:47 AM
1

Sadly /r/partnersdepression didn't take off. I subscribed when it got posted to /r/newreddits.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:21 AM
1

True, true.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:56 AM
2

Well I guess it's like anything. You can agree with some things a person says even if you think they're largely insane, and conversely you can agree with most things a person says but not all of them. (Such as with AVfM)
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:34 AM
6

Yeah, I didn't have an issue with this article, but I do think that the MRM should distance themselves from TRP wherever possible.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:55 AM
3

Just a heads up, this website (Return of Kings) is a Red Pill site.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:20 AM
2

As Tom Scott pointed out in his EMF speech (sorry, I'm at work and can't get the timecode) TIME magazine are no longer the bastion of journalism that they once were. Being published in TIME doesn't mean that much these days. Still, they do have a lot of readers so that's good!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:39 AM
6

I just checked a few that are currently on the frontpage, they all have 80-95%, I wouldn't read too much into it.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:51 AM
14

The problem here is that people are getting consent for one thing and doing another, not that people are lying to obtain consent. They're not comparable. If a woman consents to foreplay and her partner goes further, that's definitely rape. Consent can be conditional, as long as those conditions are clear to both parties.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 11:22 PM
2

Just testing something for nicemod, ignore this comment. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ckt4n/am_i_being_oversensitive_here/cjgg6l8
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:42 PM
1

Zing!
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:37 PM
1

Extreme example, but what about disabled men? Fuck them for not being able to fight back too?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:35 PM
1

Damnit, keeps catching me out.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:23 AM
3

Damn, AutoMod removed my comment for not using No Participation. Take 2: I didn't remove it, looks like NSW police did. Men's Rights Facebook pages have been made in the past, but they were all terrible. Example: http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1s3yxg/this_is_not_who_we_are_and_this_is_not_okay/
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:23 AM
1

I didn't remove it, looks like NSW police did. Men's Rights Facebook pages have been made in the past, but they were all terrible. Example: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1s3yxg/this_is_not_who_we_are_and_this_is_not_okay/
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:20 AM
1

Fixed version of my comment: Actually, the injuries to men tend to be worse. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ckt4n/am_i_being_oversensitive_here/cjh7ozl EDIT: Nevermind, I just noticed that you've already seen that. :P
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:26 AM
1

I'm not sure if it's that counter-intuitive. If we assume that women are weaker, it would make sense that they use weapons more often, and a weapon is a surefire way to make injuries significantly worse. Personally I've never really noticed a difference in strength between men and women, although that's possibly because I'm a weakling.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:10 AM
1

Actually, the injuries to men tend to be worse. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ckt4n/am_i_being_oversensitive_here/cjh7ozl EDIT: Nevermind, I just noticed that you've already seen that. :P
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:08 AM
2

Weird. Maybe deleted Facebook comments work like shadowbans? I wonder if anyone else can confirm/deny.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:42 AM
2

Can I ask what you're doing on /r/MensRights? Your beliefs are clearly not aligned with ours, and yet they also don't reflect the ideas of those against us, so I'm curious as to how you ended up here.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:25 AM
2

But the reason DV has been focused on men is the fact that male on female DV is often more violent. Actually no. See Appendix B of this document: http://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=85261703-c49e-4dbe-b2a6-239ad19a53ea&subId=298424 In particular, note the following: • Women and men who use IPV hurt their partners in similar ways (kicking, biting, punching, choking, stabbing, burning, etc), however men are as likely or significantly more likely than women to experience assaults using a we…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:21 AM
2

It still shows up for me, along with some bloke called Alan Lee complimenting me. Be careful when posting links like that btw, some people could interpret it as doxxing. I don't mind, but use caution in future.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:12 AM
2

Nice trolling.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:23 AM
2

Edgy Egalitarian Edgalitarian?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:55 AM
1

In my experience people on Reddit will definitely just make up a number, but I've only ever seen people claim that fact checking is persecution on Tumblr. ("It's not my job to educate you")
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:54 AM
2

Oops, Facebook shortened it so it didn't work when I copy/pasted. Fixed now.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:53 AM
1

Looking at the current front-page of /r/MensRights, I would be hard pressed to call 25% of it over-sensitive.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:03 AM
3

Wow thanks, I never knew about that organisation.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:00 AM
1

I believe you're thinking of Tumblr. :P
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:59 AM
2

I know you didn't say that the majority of the members are bitter and unethical. I said that. That's been my experience any time that I've gone to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:07 PM
2

Some of them, sure, but far from most. 5% or less.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:04 PM
10

Can you find the ad? Almost every ad ends up on youtube, no matter how dull or bad.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:01 PM
4

See the first link in my sources section.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:01 PM
3

Shopping more is the definition of having more purchasing power. And yeah, the reasoning for it doesn't bother me either. It is reassuring, if anything, to be reminded that the majority of the population is sane. Whenever we bring up a MR issue and explain it well enough, the public tend to take our side. It's just the mass media that's the problem.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:07 PM
1

We are against modern feminism because the actions of the individuals do not reflect the dictionary definition. It doesn't matter if TRP is meant to be a good thing, the fact is that the majority of members are bitter and unethical.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:04 PM
3

Look, I'd be willing to give TRP the benefit of the doubt if it weren't for the fact that the entire subreddit revolves around "bitter, angry people who just recently discovered TRP." I've checked out TRP a couple of times, and it is honestly just a disgusting place. For this reason I am subscribed to TheBluePill. I'm not really very liked around there, especially when people discover that I'm an egalitarian, but I feel that I need to show that I do not support TRP.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:32 PM
4

I guess it's possible, but I don't see any reason to suspect anything untoward without evidence. Isn't that a large part of what our movement is about?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:28 PM
9

That's a little over-the-top. I'm sure he was completely willing to do this.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:13 PM
2

Very good point.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:12 PM
10

It's really an issue that's swept under the rug way too much. I was at Toastmasters today and some guy for his Tabletop Speech was telling us about how he felt like a slave to his wife. Everyone kinda awkwardly laughed it off. I hope he's okay.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:50 AM
21

Green is me, by the way. EDIT: Constructive criticism very welcome. EDIT2: I added sources, the text of my comment now reads: 40% of domestic violence is committed against men. Domestic violence is undoubtedly a huge issue that needs to be stopped, but please stop turning it into a gendered issue. The whole "are you man enough to stop domestic violence" thing is why domestic violence against men is so under-reported, because men believe that it's their own fault for not being able to stand up fo…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:25 AM
4

Well on an ad, sure. Women have the most purchasing power, after all. Nothing wrong with a nice dose of capitalism.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:37 AM
4

Making these sorts of comments doesn't do anything to help our cause, and merely allows people to paint us as misogynists.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:29 AM
28

"I don't need feminism because they reject femininity and try to feminize men, and demand equality and ask for special treatment." Even if this girl really believes this, is this such a big injustice to this girl that she just had to take to social media to have her views heard? Seems pretty unlikely. This woman cannot even imagine someone caring about an issue that doesn't directly affect them. How self-centered can you get?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:53 AM
8

Sure. That doesn't mean they're men though.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:51 AM
1

I have a question for you: Are you an account used by one person, or a shared account for friendly suggestions? If you're just one person, I want to say that you are an awesome person and a fantastic moderator. If you're a communal account, I want to say that I love the moderators of this community and it really is a safe place. Either way, keep up the good work, friend.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 10:30 AM
5

Also, my birthday.
/r/PussyPass18/07/14 01:45 AM
-1

Every subreddit has to have a circlejerk at some point.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:44 AM
0

I get it with Stormfront, but I think it's pretty clear what "Return of Kings" is about from their name.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:31 AM
2

I didn't read the article, I just read saw that it was on ROK. That sounds absolutely awful, I hope people stop upvoting it.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:05 PM
1

I have to leave for work and don't have the time to sort through this now, but there are some interesting statistics on domestic abuse through here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26ki80/gender_symmetry_research_women_are_as_violent_as/
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:42 PM
2

If you read Return of Kings' about page, it becomes pretty clear that their beliefs are not at all aligned with ours: http://www.returnofkings.com/about Return of Kings is a Red Pill site, and it is actively harmful to the MRA cause.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:36 PM
1

If a feminist just closes an argument by using some B.S. like "mansplaining", they haven't won. They're just embarrassing themselves. Cold hard logic is what we need to employ, name calling isn't going to achieve anything.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 09:32 PM
3

You could say that he's a... Nice Mod.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:35 PM
2

Oh, sure. I thought we were talking about politics and not economics. All current currencies are fiat, so I'm not sure what the problem is there.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:27 AM
6

I have a theory on politics, which is that the larger a population is, the less idealized the society can be. Communism is fantastic IN THEORY. Everyone working together and sharing? Sounds amazing, right? And sure, you can run a household with communism, everyone helping out and sharing bills and not caring too much about individual debt. Maybe you could even run a small town. But try to run a country, like China, and of course it all falls apart. A direct democracy isn't quite as good as commu…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:06 AM
3

My response to this article when I saw it on Facebook: It's an interesting perspective, but I believe it's crap. Pedophiles are very much a minority of men, and it's stupid to fear ~49.8% of the population just because a couple of them are bad. It's like that awful poisoned m&m's analogy from #YesAllWomen all over again! Also, we're now in a situation where women are repeatedly getting away with sexual abuse because of the stereotype that only men can commit sexual abuse, or that boys 'enjoy' st…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:01 AM
0

Well yeah, obviously it's referring to that cliche. It didn't invent the cliche though, and it's not actually perpetuating it, just referencing it. Being an MRA doesn't mean that we're unable to take a joke.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:39 AM
2

Um, am I missing something? A woman could do something stupid and buy flowers for her husband just as easily. I don't see a problem here.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:57 AM
0

Thanks for putting exactly my point into a much more cohesive paragraph than I ever could have achieved.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:01 PM
7

I am completely unfamiliar with her music or public image, I found this article on /r/Music and found it interesting. I don't think the way she presents herself in Pussy should be related to the actions of these individuals against her, I think it's an entirely separate issue.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 11:53 AM
3

Holy crap, so my guess at what their reaction might be WAS ACTUALLY RIGHT!? I was intending it to be hyperbolic, that's freaking crazy.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:14 AM
20

I didn't mention feminism?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 07:01 AM
8

I don't think the radfems will ever turn against women, they'd just dismiss this as internalised misogyny or something. Maybe they'd say that the only reason Iggy Azalea found the experience unpleasant was because sexual assault is usually conducted by males, and that sexual assault by a woman is actually a good thing. Who knows how they'd spin it?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:55 AM
11

I wasn't meaning to insinuate that it was feminists that were fingering her. What I'm saying is that society's attitude to women always being victims and only men being able to be aggressors is harmful to both genders.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 06:41 AM
9

Oops, I forgot to give it flair. Thankyou, oh mighty moderators, for not removing my post and instead applying an appropriate flair for me.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:08 AM
12

All of the comments are either feminists or badly spelled MRA posts with questionable logic. I don't want to sound like a conspiracy nut, but it seems they might be moderating out all of the sensible MRA comments in order to alter our public image.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:16 AM
10

I think it's ridiculous when people are against women's rights, or against the basic concept of feminism. I think it's far from ridiculous when people are against feminism in its current form.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:22 AM
5

What'd I miss? And did they get banned or did they voluntarily delete their comment?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:21 AM
2

You could say that he's a... silly mod. Nah, I'm just kidding, seems like a nice thing for him to do. I wonder what /u/EmaciatedFox did to get shadowbanned... Promoting Animal Cruelty?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:49 PM
3

Ah. I never knew that! Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the shadowban though, because it means mods are likely to inform the user of their 'invisible' ban status?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:10 PM
3

Wait, so why can we still see their post? I thought shadowbanned meant only they could see their posts.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:31 PM
2

Thanks. And yeah, Imgur is great.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:00 AM
3

It's gone there too. Please just use Imgur?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:04 PM
3

Interesting, I had thought that people who said average to refer to anything other than the mean were incorrect. TIL 'In colloquial language average usually refers to the sum of a list of numbers divided by the size of the list, in other words the arithmetic mean. However, the word "average" can be used to refer to the median, the mode, or some other central or typical value.'
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:49 PM
2

Average usually means mean, but I do understand that some people don't treat it as such. That said: and mean female hostility towards men is 0.10
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:31 AM
4

I didn't see that. Interesting that OP calls it both the average and the mean, both of which are wrong. Maybe I'm paranoid, but it's almost like he's trying to prove that we're stupid or something. Especially because the statistics seem less than useful, and it rates hostility towards women as higher than hostility towards men in the US and Australia, two of the main countries that we talk about in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:43 AM
21

That looks to be median rather than mean to me, OP.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:17 AM
1

Oh, true. I misread. They did, at the very least, strongly imply it. They specifically mentioned Reddit and then that quote.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:11 AM
3

But /u/whinemoreplease already addressed exactly that. TIME magazine specifically said the quote was from Reddit, and /u/whinemoreplease pointed out that Reddit is heavily indexed. He even provided an easy test to prove it. You're at fault here, you were arguing for no reason with no facts to back you up. You could've seen that you were wrong in less time than it took for you to write that comment.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:41 AM
2

I don't see the problem here. Street harassment shouldn't be seen as normal, it's horrible. We're about Men's Rights, not Anti-Women's Rights. EDIT: For reference, here is something to get angry about.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:57 AM
1

I tried /r/MRRef before posting here, but I couldn't find anything. :/
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:26 AM
3

They keep changing it back, but at least it's now also part of a series on discrimination. I don't have an issue with this, issues can be covered by multiple groups. It's a shame there is no series on MRM, otherwise we could add that too and then it would be fully equal. I don't think it's too bad currently though.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:58 AM
10

It doesn't matter, you got upvotes. That means the community agrees.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:38 AM
16

The fact that this comment got upvotes restored my faith in this community a little bit. The fact that we can laugh at ourselves is the main thing that keeps us from becoming a circlejerk.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:34 AM
5

I wouldn't be surprised if a couple were, but it's worth remembering that rapists are still a massive minority in both genders. So I can't imagine that to be the reason for most of the feminists.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:46 AM
1

Original post: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1jnf48/infographic_40_of_rapists_are_female/?already_submitted=true Found in a comments thread here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ygsqk/a_very_old_man_pointed_this_out_to_me_on_the_bus/cfkn50s It's been posted before, but quite a few people in the comments mentioned that they'd never seen it before, so I thought I'd repost it for visibility.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:23 AM
14

It's not legal, but it's not considered rape. Pretty sure it's still considered assault.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:55 PM
13

Yup, looks like there's going to be five hundred thousand pounds just sitting there, inaccessible.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:26 PM
2

But then later in that post you realise the main flaw: Each stage has value, because to reach a later one, you must go through the earlier ones. If I were to say "don't be so angry" to someone who comes here to say "all women are bitches and whores", then I would be interrupting his process of coming to terms with the loss of his illusions. The people who visit TRP are in stages 2-4. People in stages 1 and 5 are disgusted by the other people in TRP and leave. So the subreddit just turns into a g…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:18 AM
1

Yeah, this article just repeats a bunch of things we already knew in terms that are, shall we say, not at all diplomatic. And in some cases it's just downright stupid. Just because a man is expect to show some initiative doesn't mean he has to do sexually suggestive things without consent. I'm pretty sure this article was written by some bitter alfalfa from /r/TheRedPill Spreading this sort of article will hurt our cause much more than it will help. You can't just spew crazy things that go again…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 09:32 AM
1

210KB is still tiny.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:00 AM
2

Reminds me of an episode of the IT Crowd about calendars.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 01:16 PM
3

You haven't provided any counter evidence.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:49 AM
1

Let me Google that for you...
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:06 AM
44

"It's Time For Companies To Fire Their Human Resource Departments" But who's going to fire them? Well, I guess that'd be the job of the human resource depa...... shit
/r/MensRights13/11/13 05:56 PM
1

Just hoping I don't get anything like that today.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:13 PM
1

Who would I report this to?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:13 PM
6

I think we're past that stage by now. Feminism is treated as an established fact and we the MRM are the lone nutters. Feminism has basically already succeeded. They don't want to admit that they've succeeded though because then they will no longer be seen as the "resistance" which is so glorified, they won't have the underdog advantage anymore. Their whole argument is against oppression and so once it becomes clear that they are no longer being oppressed their entire movement will collapse.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:06 AM
2

That neatly sums it up.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:46 AM
10

Ooh yeah, didn't think of that. I'll try to find it. (I actually got that second picture off a friend so don't know what question it was. Thanks /u/momomanera95) EDIT: Sample answer I guess it's not as bad as it could've been. EDIT2: /u/momoslayer95 -> /u/momomanera95
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:28 AM
3

It's the HSC, meaning it's a standard test across the state. You can dispute the results you get but if you do they just remark it, there's no way to speak to them to call them out. I'm just doing these past papers for revision, thankfully.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:01 AM
-1

What campaign was this in response to?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:58 AM
7

First picture: Business Studies Second picture: Economics
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:53 AM
9

You could have left the c***s in as it can mean two different things... Then again, "c u next Tuesdays" is clearly less offensive.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:44 AM
8

Just because you physically want sex doesn't mean you mentally want it. Most female rape victims don't report the rape because they are ashamed that they enjoyed it. Same principle for males, physical and emotional are very different.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:46 PM
102

As far as I can read it she hasn't trespassed since she was issued with the no trespassing order. First time - warning from school Second time - no trespass order from police Third time - hasn't happened yet, proper legal action Could be wrong though
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:35 PM
2

Nope, the address was edited into the image. Also, Facebook has a See More button on long posts that is used to stop them from cluttering things.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter