TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Yamochao Archive

View 2 posts and 250 comments by Yamochao on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The ones I remember the most fondly are those I've had the deepest emotional and intellectual connections with, even briefly. I think about the women I've stayed up late talking to but was never intimate with more than the ones I had amazing but superfluous sex with. I've had some crazy stories for sure, I once matched with a woman and fucked in an airport parking garage within ~10m of meeting on her layover in my city. Hooked up with a british doctor in a tent in Central America. I had stealth-…
/r/seduction21/04/26 02:57 PM
4

Confidence, and here's the thing, it's not instant and you can't fake it. Confidence is different than posturing, and it's different than pride. Confidence comes from pushing yourself to do things that are hard for you and knowing that you're living a life along your own values. You can't fake that shit, and trying to will earn you contempt. We all know a guy who's clearly vapid and insecure and just following wrote info he found on websites like these in a desperate attempt for positive attenti…
/r/seduction16/04/26 04:26 PM
-1

Uh, don't. Trust me, women want to date someone who is living for themselves, confident, following their passions, not making life decisions around how to meet women. Bro. That's not how a confident, self-determined person behaves. Look for your Ikigai, you can meet women anywhere, in fact it's way WAY better to keep your personal and professional life separate or you'll probably fuck up both of them at the same time. That said, grooming, cosmetology, medicine, service, dance/fine-art, massage, …
/r/seduction13/03/26 08:24 PM
8

Oh? Yeah? are you a sociologist? No? Then you don't know why you're randomly speculating based on your own biases, stfu
/r/MensRights24/02/26 01:03 AM
1

I can think of a lot of cities in Central and South America....
/r/seduction21/10/25 05:20 PM
142

> Still hard after he came Tadalafil, they're on tadalafil. Possibly also T. That's the answer. Especially if you're into big athletic guys. Generally it's making it harder for them to cum, and making them last a long time. Regardless, men orgasming has nothing to do with whether they like you. This is a weird sub to ask this.
/r/seduction20/10/25 06:48 PM
8

This is wildly misleading misinformation. First of all, it's 67% NOT 95% Second of all, way, way more inmates are male. Proportional to prison population, sexual misconduct is more frequent in male guard -> female inmate. However, >90% of inmates are male, so this is why you see higher absolute volume of misconduct committed against male inmates. For example, 80% of people in the world have brown hair. This is like saying 80% of people who roll 1 on a 6 sided die have brown hair, and therefore b…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 07:14 PM
1

Confidence is nuanced. If you think that confidence means being 'alpha,' and domineering, then yes, it's unbelievably overrated. If you understand that confidence means being vulnerable, kind, not constantly needing to prove yourself, then it's hella underrated.
/r/seduction13/10/25 03:28 PM
0

This. Don't date women who's goals are in conflict with your own.
/r/seduction22/09/25 02:06 PM
1

99% of what you're going to read here is echo chamber bullshit from people who don't have woman friends, aren't getting laid, and haven't been in successful relationships. The PUA social bubble is pretty much overlapped with incel culture, the blind leading the blind. Unsubscribe here and subscribe instead to feminist subs, askwomen, etc. Then make friends with women in real life who have similar interests, and truly seek to understand what the world looks like from their eyes. The way to unders…
/r/seduction22/09/25 01:26 PM
-12

I love it when you guys have hot shit to say about a video and you don't even watch it. I watched the whole video, her point is to highlight policy already performed by modern and historical governments in order to cull excess male populations. This should be y'alls bread and butter and pretty much aligns with the the stuff this sub spouts all day Misleading title + woman talking + y'all didn't bother to watch the video === Ragebait.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 01:59 PM
2

I genuinely feel like most of this sub is actually actively detrimental to y'alls goals. The more you contextualize yourself as playing a game against women and trying to trick them, the more you'll repel the actual women you want to attract. That's most of what this sub is about. Treating women like people, having friends who are women, being honest with others and with yourself, this is the way. The less you focus your attention on 'seduction' the more you actually attract connection with peop…
/r/seduction11/09/25 05:35 PM
0

nomnomnomnom
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:48 AM
1

Do it
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:38 AM
-2

I don't think this is true
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:38 AM
-1

Which part specifically do you disagree with? That height has an outsized effect on attraction? Or that FFM is easy to assess from pictures but difficult to assess from a number? These are extremely well-studied and known things. The rest is mostly a common sense inference framed with "you could argue" and "I imagine" so I'm not sure what claims you're wanting sources for.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 12:37 AM
5

My lived reality begs to differ 🤷‍♂️ Women (and everyone else) are judging you by the material substance of your life, just like you do for others. Your 'attitude' is a signaling proxy for how you are actually living your life. Your confidence will scale with living a life truly in line with your values and goals, but you're right there's inner work to be done as well. Could you hypothetically fake it? Maybe, if you're a sociopath and a good actor, but honestly not for long. Women are generally …
/r/seduction11/09/25 12:30 AM
2

Check my post history, I literally only come here to try to deprogram people
/r/seduction11/09/25 12:23 AM
3

Damn, I do usually come here as a feminist to debate with y'all, but I have to admit this is a pretty good point. My only counter is that adiposity (fatness) is something generally better discerned from photos than from a single measured number (unless it's FFM, but most people don't know their own FFM). On the other hand, height, while a deal breaker for many people's preferences, isn't something you can tell from photos but is a pronounced, measurable value that most people know and has an out…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 06:35 PM
35

Absolute most important: Gtfo this sub. Get a lucrative career, get fit, make friends, get educated, pursue your passions, be a good person and get some good photos taken. Sex follows success.
/r/seduction10/09/25 06:24 PM
2

Wow, garbage advice in this thread. I've had FFM threesomes with I think 9 different groups and was in a triad for a while. Every single time it happened with advanced discussion and enthusiastic consent w/ the woman I was partnered with (if there was one). Imo, if they're not into it, don't try to make it happen, absolutely do not try to start something without talking to your partner privately ahead of time and getting her enthusiastic consent. If you pressure her into it, everyone is going to…
/r/seduction09/09/25 05:39 PM
1

I have professional photos on my dating profile and a bio that highlights areas of my lifestyle and personal philosophy which the kind of women I'm looking for tends to find attractive (I have an interesting/lucrative career, varied hobbies, leftist/feminist ideology, and some photos of me doing manual labor with my shirt off + tattoos on display). Importantly, also, I'm upfront in my bio that I'm non-monogamous and kind of a man slut, so people filter themselves. I get a lot of matches and go o…
/r/seduction05/09/25 06:41 PM
1

What I do: - When I see them, I get animated, start walking a little more goofy or excited skipping (I'm a shameless, performative guy though, might not be your thing). I'll usually just give a so-excited-to-see-you "ahhhhhh" - Open my arms as I near, 95% of the time they'll smile and match my energy/excitement and I'll pick them up in a bear hug and spin them around. If there's any stiffness or prickliness, I immediately dial it back and just asking them about how they are (honestly, the rare t…
/r/seduction04/09/25 04:50 PM
3

Follow this guys advice, this is pro level human-ing
/r/seduction16/04/25 12:25 AM
3

I usually go on ~1 date a week and it almost always ends in hooking up, but I wouldn't call myself a player. I think "player" generally implies someone who is being deceptive in order to get women, "playing" games their emotions and giving them a false sense of extended interest in order to get in their pants. For me: I'm skinny and average looking BUT I have a unique aesthetic (cool, unique tattoos + interesting clothes/jewelry/haircut), I'm confident, I have an interesting job title, and I hav…
/r/seduction01/03/25 11:45 PM
2

Good news: Women can turn down sex for any reason and so can you. If you aren’t attracted to a woman don’t have sex with her. Just say you’re not feeling it anymore, citing specific body parts is rude and unnecessary. If a woman asks you to get circumcised, say no, move on, and date someone who likes your penis. Simple as.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 02:17 AM
119

This is weird incel lookmaxxing trash. Blind leading the blind. Exercise, wash and groom, make sure you smell good, then dress in a way that expresses yourself and ask your friends for feedback to see if you have any blind spots. You’re trying to capitulate to a statistical average by not smiling and getting a specific number of tattoos? Not wearing jewelry because you think it’s gay? Bro, cmon. That isn’t exuding confidence, it’s just you desperately trying to be liked by as many people as poss…
/r/seduction27/02/25 02:05 AM
1

Become less needy by moving on. There’s always another deal.
/r/seduction05/02/25 06:58 AM
3

Standards don’t just mean looks…
/r/seduction05/02/25 06:50 AM
397

Real answer: Significantly lower your standards Then eventually realize that this isn’t actually what you want
/r/seduction04/02/25 05:42 AM
0

Do whatever you want, bro. You asked for advice, I gave it, take it or leave it, don't argue with me about it.
/r/seduction29/09/24 06:24 PM
-1

idk man, I'm going on successful dates twice a week, pretty much only limited by my own free time. I'm never thinking about people with this much suspiciousness and combativeness 🤷‍♂️ Stop playing games. If you think they might be cool, buy them drinks. If you don't know them at all, find out. If you suspect that they aren't interesting, move on. It's really that simple. Women like men who are open and generous, not paranoid and stingy 😅 If a few drinks is so consequential for you financially, t…
/r/seduction29/09/24 02:26 PM
5

Therapy will probably make you stop calling it a game and hanging out in stupid subs like this, and start actually connecting with women and getting laid.
/r/seduction29/09/24 04:30 AM
-1

Uh. Are they attractive/interesting looking? Then do it. Seems like a no-brainer. ITT dudes playing games, being combative and acting broke. If they're acting thirsty, buy them drinks. You have nothing to lose except pocket change.
/r/seduction29/09/24 04:25 AM
1

You answered your own question, do massage, it's the best. Be good at it though.
/r/seduction09/09/24 05:17 AM
9

First of all, if you haven't confirmed with them I wouldn't assume they identify as a boy, they might be trans. Secondly, it's literally the same, just complement them and then ask them humanizing, open ended questions. If you get a vibe ask them out, if you don't, don't.
/r/seduction09/09/24 04:53 AM
71

They don't. This is dumb. Thinking of yourself as intellectually superior and people having normal sexual relationships as dumb jocks is some incel shit. "Uwu, I'm just tooo smart and analytical" Having a superiority complex, being condescending, or feeling the need to always show people how smart you are is the turn off. I can almost guarantee it. There are plenty of men who are brilliant, but don't feel the need to hold it over other people all the time or make it a core part of their identity…
/r/seduction04/09/24 06:34 PM
1

Sounds like you got a lot going for you, dawg! I'd say just make sure you actually have good, professional photos of yourself that tell a story. You have to think about it like you're marketing a product and really have empathy for people who know nothing about you who are looking at it, leave your ego at the door. Seriously spend an afternoon reading blog posts about how to tell a story with your tinder photos and use an app like photo feeler to objectively measure which photos of you are best.
/r/seduction04/09/24 04:26 AM
1

Yup. You generally have to be high status in some way. You're not going to get matches like a handsome doctor if you work in fast food and have facial deformities. I'm not saying it'll work miracles for you as a low-status or conventionally unattractive person, but it's the absolute best you can do without making qualitative changes to your career, lifestyle, or appearance, and if you're even average looking, it's plenty. Focusing on absolutely anything else in your profile besides having the ni…
/r/seduction04/09/24 12:38 AM
5

Both overthought and under analyzed. Be yourself, be funny, get some professional photos taken where you actually look hot. Don’t skimp on the last part and you’ll beat 90% of scrubs. That’s pretty much it.
/r/seduction03/09/24 10:40 PM
2

Improve yourself so that they’re in your league, or stop thinking some people are better than others
/r/seduction29/08/24 01:17 AM
1

Indicative of emotional intelligence, work ethic, passion, creativity, consistency, constructivism, authenticity and the capacity to synthesize information. These are all checkered flags, indicative of neurological health and the capacity to be high social status and a good partner. More so in our natural environment than in the modern world, but still to some degree.
/r/seduction24/08/24 02:24 AM
2

Because it’s an essential human quality for fitness, survival, and for protecting, nurturing, and providing for children
/r/seduction19/08/24 01:32 PM
0

I think any of us could’ve told you that without needing direct experience…
/r/seduction09/07/24 02:16 PM
4

They're either the absolute best, a bot, or it's a shell account to promote their influencer account/OF. But the real ones are great, they just have overloaded inboxes. 🥂 + 🎉 == 😌
/r/seduction11/06/24 02:35 AM
1

The harm in trying is that it's annoying for the people who are obviously busy. It's not practice in being charming, it's being brazenly oblivious to social context and other people's needs...
/r/seduction09/06/24 10:14 PM
3

Yeah. So, on that note, don't fucking do this. Don't hit on women in grocery stores. Women are almost never in the mood to meet someone in a grocery store. Go to clubs, bars, meetups, and dog parks like a normal person. You will only have discouraging results from hitting on women who are clearly just trying to get through their fucking day and not even remotely trying to socialize
/r/seduction09/06/24 03:20 PM
3

Put yourself first. If you do shit because it's exciting, interesting, and challenging to you, you'll become a confident and authentic person. If you do shit because you think it will earn you admiration or attention from women, you'll become a thin-skinned poser totally reliant on others for validation. Most women can tell the difference because it will be the truth and it will come out through everything you do and say. I recommend leaving this sub-- seriously ;)
/r/seduction12/04/24 09:49 PM
1

I've called a woman a coward before. She was being a coward. But yeah, I think that's a gendered one too.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:26 PM
1

I'm a feminist, and this is a great point. Unfair gender standards for men and women creep into the fabric of our language all over the fucking place and this is one of them.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:32 AM
13

Hey, guys, some women like dadbod, some like bears, some like skeletons, some like chiseled models. It's a pretty even spread. Checkout the 10,000 askreddit threads if you don't believe me. The science says that confidence, facial symmetry, signals of status and wealth, hygiene, and (unfortunately) height are the biggest factors of attraction for women. Facial hair, hairstyle, body-type and muscularity are all over the place and really more of an individual preference. Find the women for whom yo…
/r/seduction21/03/24 09:13 PM
1

So what do the other 5/6 say, eh? 1/6 people believe that COVID was a bioweapon made by the government. 1/6 people think that antibiotics can be used for viral infections Claiming 1/6 people disapprove of a thing isn't the rebuke of that thing that you think it is.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 01:59 AM
0

Not an attack, genuinely concerned!
/r/MensRights01/03/24 08:42 PM
-13

ok, bud, you spent too much time on this. Go touch grass.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 12:49 AM
-18

Stupidest conspiracy shit I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:13 PM
1

I follow dating trends tiktok Yeah, sure, browsing social media, a famously accurate reflection of reality and public sentiment.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:02 AM
0

Still I can’t get any women to be interested in me at all and it really seems like they all hate me. You're getting the hate you put out in the world reflected back to you. It's really that simple. I'm sorry someone hurt you. You need to break the cycle of hate if you want to be happy.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 08:24 PM
0

This study was exclusively done on a Norwegian sample. I don't see any reason to believe that the results would apply in, say, the United States, where we have a completely different culture... They may, they may not-- why you using random Norway-specific cultural studies tho.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:13 AM
0

Dude hogs a bench at the gym to make a lengthy complaining reddit post while the gym is clearly very busy and can't figure out why other people in the gym don't like him. Don't see the irony here, OP? As someone who spends a lot of time at the gym chuds like you who sit on their phone the whole time and then spread bad vibes are the absolute worst. Also, how tf is this related to this sub
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:13 PM
2

Physical things: Get a haircut, shape your beard, wear clothes that fit and accentuate your shoulders
/r/seduction06/10/23 10:58 PM
1

Not even remotely a rebuttal of what I said Displays baffling misunderstanding of how genetic expression and natural selection works; ironically while expounding on own categorical intelligence. Men and women are not evolving separately. Intelligence is more useful for men? Based on what fucking evidence Ugh.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 06:00 PM
4

Bars and clubs, yes. Supermarket and park, no. It's actually pretty simple, man. Not rocket science. Just talk to them normally for a minute to gauge interest before you say anything overtly sexual or forward. If she isn't holding the conversation or seems uncomfortable after a few minutes go talk to someone else. If everyone you approach is uncomfortable, I would recommend trying to empathize and figure out why (I have no idea how you or your friend interacts with people, personally). This is m…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 01:50 AM
1

Try this and report back. Please let me know how it works for you.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:50 AM
1

You seriously should, but after you do a lot of gender affirmation surgery and HRT so they believe you.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 03:14 AM
1

trans-maxxing Do it. You gotta go all the way though, get HRT.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 10:56 PM
1

They're not. Unemployment is notably extremely low right now for men and women. Men's unemployment rate generally runs just slightly higher, but this is generally understood to be caused more by the fact that women more selectively seek employment (the denominator of unemployment's definition). "Reading people's experiences online" is not evidence of trends, this is survivorship bias fallacy. "People I know" is not evidence of trends, this is sampling bias fallacy. People in this sub are garbage…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 10:48 PM
1

one was genuine Wtf.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 06:54 PM
1

I'm not saying it's true, I'm not saying it's false. I haven't done enough research to confidently make such affirmations. I'm just saying the post makes no sense and you can't draw any conclusion from it. That's fair, and I am definitely assuming good faith on your part having said so. Others ITT are claiming that it is false, so I'm asking why. 'There's an error in an image series that summarized an article which cited research.' just seems silly to point out to me; like judging a book because…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 04:42 AM
1

Sure, this is known as statistical sampling) and projection. There are high and low quality instances. ​ The studies they're referencing are conducted by the Beareau of Justice Statistics about unreported crimes generally. I do believe this post misrepresents the exact numbers, but not in a qualitatively distinctive way. ​ You can read about their methodology and decide for yourself, but I think it's kind of silly to have an opinion about the correctness of a study you haven't read. In the metho…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 12:01 AM
1

lol true, I noticed that too I think they meant 4% * 1% == .0004, which is true, but they added a '%' sign like a dummy. Granted, that's not a math mistake from the researchers they're citing OR the article this series of images is based on, it's just . Have you read those? Or you've just already decided they're wrong without reading them. ​ I, for one, take issue with some of the numbers they've chosen, because I've actually read the Beaureau of Justice Statistics reports of which this is deriv…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 11:54 PM
-1

Only x% are false implies that the rest are not false I think you're completely misunderstanding, here. The unreported ones can't be false accusations; they're unreported. Would you like a very long list? Sure, can you give me a sense of how frequently each one motivates false accusation? Please include some peer reviewed sources supporting these numbers, and I'll absolutely consider them with an open mind, just like I did with this article :)
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:27 AM
1

What standard of proof are they using then. So you've decided whether an empirical fact is true, but you haven't yet investigated it? If so, you're not really assimilating new information, you're just deciding that things are untrue because they don't validate your prior opinions. I believe this is the article the slides are outlining with sources. Why don't you look into it and decide whether you think the facts are credible or not...
/r/MensRights22/02/23 12:20 AM
-4

It assumes that all allegations No it doesn't.... the incentives What incentives?
/r/MensRights21/02/23 01:06 AM
-7

What, specifically, do you disagree with? They've cited specific studies, do you have a critique of those studies' methodology? Do you have other studies or evidence which you believe are more rigorous?
/r/MensRights20/02/23 07:24 PM
4

I believe her words were “Fuck y'all, I’m innocent, you’re garbage”
/r/MensRights19/02/23 02:28 AM
-1

Woosh
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:19 AM
-1

Show me the law that prevents or forces men from getting vasectomies....
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:49 PM
0

Show me someone who holds both of these positions. I don't think you can. ​ Inb4 baseless anecdotal claims.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 06:52 PM
-3

I’ve noticed this too, definitely a thing. Although, tbh, I think there’s reasonably just a lot more pressure from the women because 1. Women’s clothes tend to be more form fitting, so big women need to know when clothes were made specifically for them, whereas there’s more wiggle room on sizing larger men’s clothes and 2. Women have eating disorders like 15:1 compared to men, so it makes sense that women consumers would put a lot more pressure/care about representation a lot more. Also women ju…
/r/MensRights13/01/23 06:11 AM
-1

I'll put it this way: you posted a complaint to an echo chamber incel community about how people keep calling you an incel. ITT almost every single comment airs grievances with 'women' as a generalized monolith. What do you think incel means?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 04:52 PM
1

That’s not the “default insult” I get. Sounds like there might be a reason you’re hearing that a lot…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:55 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights12/12/22 04:30 PM
-4

Woosh
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:54 PM
-2

Looks like she's succeeded.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 09:02 PM
0

Again htf is this "mens rights." It's not even phrased with any kind of generalizability? I stg sometimes, this sub should just be called "women suck, look at these specific women doing specifically shitty things"
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:47 PM
-42

I don’t believe you. I’ve never heard of this happening to anyone and it’s certainly not the norm.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:46 PM
0

I'll tell you exactly; she's mad, feels wronged/offended/hurt/verbally attacked, and she thinks she can escalate physically without any consequences because a man won't hit her. ​ That said, I don't think he needed to hit her. She wasn't a real threat to him, and I don't think we should be glorifying this.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/22 10:29 PM
4

who does not have any friends or know a ton of people I would start there. I've been there and it sucks. I think most people in your situation are lonely and find themselves with a lack of intimacy, friendship and support, which is a related but more fundamental problem which should be much higher priority for you than getting laid. How have you made friends in the past? By approaching strangers in restaurants? ofc not. You talked to people in class, or at one of your hobbies and shared a strugg…
/r/seduction29/10/22 10:09 PM
4

Being authentic is hard, especially if you are someone who feels insecure/inadequate and walks through life with a mask on. The thing about the mask is that it usually works fine when you’re going shopping, going to work, seeing a doctor, etc. its completely finee and even helpful for getting through single serving interactions. Totally flounders when you’re trying to connect with someone or holding up to the scrutiny of a longer conversation. I think being authentic is coupled closely with bein…
/r/seduction29/10/22 06:20 PM
3

Do! That doesn't mean you have to not take meds or tell people about your diagnosis within minutes of meeting them. I'm sure you have other facets to your personality and you can do things that are difficult for you just like anyone else. ​ Here's the thing about challenging yourself, literally anyone can do it because it's about doing what's hard for you
/r/seduction29/10/22 12:27 AM
10

The fact that you feels that way is an absolute billboard declaring "I AM NOT CONFIDENT" You're basically saying, "if I present myself authentically to women, they will not be attracted to me." Compare that with someone who's constantly challenging themselves, who proves to themselves every week that they are someone who's not afraid to live according to their values. When he talks to women, he's not afraid to let his attraction show, so they take it or leave it right away. He knows he's fucking…
/r/seduction29/10/22 12:08 AM
13

Not at all, man. Thanks for sharing. I think one of the (only) positive things sub does is gets people who are sitting on the bench to hype themselves up and go out and talk to people they're attracted to. Sometimes that's literally all it takes. I think it's great that you talked to that girl; that was you doing something you were afraid of and you should be proud of yourself for it. ​ I think, almost everything else here, is pretty counterproductive. You have to recognize that the people posti…
/r/seduction29/10/22 12:01 AM
-30

From the article: “Conclusion: This article took a look at the numerous ways to get a guy to get you pregnant and also highlighted the motivations behind women who engage in such behaviours. Furthermore, the article also advised against such tactics and why they are wrong.”
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:44 PM
1

Seriously: By caring about other things. Read "How to not give a fuck" by Mark Manson, it's a seriously excellent book. Ngaf is all about finding what you truly value and what imbues life with real meaning for you. Once you do this, it's easier to let go of ego and silly things. Though, if you do this in earnest, you might find that interest in 'seduction' is really a proxy for other, more important unmet needs.
/r/seduction25/10/22 03:21 AM
1

Yup, extremely well put. These qualities often lead to hating, blaming, oversimplifying or demeaning women; nothing will kill your game faster, I promise.
/r/seduction12/10/22 03:22 PM
1

Totally, like all of the other legislation Biden's been able to will into existence despite Machin and Sinema blocking everything /s
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:32 PM
5

From the article White House said it supports including all women in the draft
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:37 PM
3

29
/r/seduction05/10/22 04:50 PM
15

First off all, jfc dude, don’t ever text something like this to someone you haven’t already been sexual with. You see this person every day, why would you not explore this thread in person. It’s always 10000% better to initiate intimacy in person. Texting is cowardly and ineffective. Texting someone from the other room in a way that doesn’t match your in person behavior feels two faced af. You messed up here, own it. In person. “Hey, I don’t know what I was thinking, I was seriously misreading t…
/r/seduction05/10/22 02:39 PM
2

Bad bad bad. Implies that it would’ve been fine to text her that at another time (which it clearly wouldn’t be) and deflects the reason you both know she didn’t want you to say that.
/r/seduction05/10/22 02:23 PM
3

More severely lowers your standards than “gets you laid”, imo
/r/seduction01/10/22 05:30 AM
1

Now you know and you can put your time towards others. Dont waste time on someone who isn’t interested in you. They won’t come around, ever.
/r/seduction29/09/22 05:57 PM
1

Sounds like you’re extrapolating a specific love experience onto an entire gender, tbh
/r/seduction19/09/22 03:52 AM
32

Not just fucking chilling and treating them like people. Seriously. If you're reading this, the fact that your worldview leads you to this sub for diplomatic advice-- as if women were an alien species or combative that needs strategizing around --this internal outlook is the major reason you're not connecting.
/r/seduction15/09/22 07:49 PM
2

First date kiss or you're a friend that pays for things, and you're not on a date.. Nothing wrong with being a friend who pays for things, it's a wonderful thing to be if both parties are aligned. But stop believing you're dating this girl.
/r/seduction12/09/22 01:05 AM
1

The older you are, the more women there are your age since men die earlier than women. ​ Get your practice in now, and you'll be big pimpin in the nursing home in a few decades. Talking 2:1, baby, 2:1 ​ If you're tryna date women half your age... probably just use seekingarrangements. If you go for it, be prepared to be shunned by anyone in your life who finds out and feel like a pathetic cradle robber during post-nut clarity/pretty much all of your time spent with them. And enjoy spend your tim…
/r/seduction01/09/22 06:16 PM
-21

Sounds like an awkward misconception….? She didn’t know he was blind…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:17 PM
1

In short: Ask yourself if how you behave towards women would be worthy of a post to https://www.reddit.com/r/niceguys/ If yes, stop.
/r/seduction11/08/22 11:56 PM
0

Mic drop
/r/seduction11/08/22 11:54 PM
0

Do it, vasectomy is a great, medically sound procedure! Not sure what it has to do with men's rights!
/r/MensRights11/08/22 08:26 PM
6

it's pretty clear that male pattern baldness, for example, is genetically inherited from the mother's father. Why would it matter if intelligence is inherited from the mother's side. What the fuck does this have to do with mensrights? Is it offensive/feminist to say that parental contributions to phenotypes are asymmetrical? That's just true, it has nothing to do with either parent's individual worth or value...
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:13 AM
1

I read that bitch, and it said with perfect use, the failure rate is 3%. I know, I highlighted that sentence for you. Seems like you need some help reading further, here are the sentences immediately following: A large number of studies on condom breakage, report rates that vary from less than 1% to more than 10%.[2] Although many people mistakenly assume that all men know how to correctly use condoms, incorrect use is common and is a major cause of condom failure. A survey on condom use showed …
/r/MensRights24/07/22 05:39 AM
0

You are wrong
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:39 AM
-3

You're opinions ignore reality. Condoms have a significantly higher failure rate. They fail like %12 of the time. They break. Sometimes women are raped. Also, you can always, oh you know... abstain? It's called having standards. jfc dude, this is so stupid and ignorant I don't even know where to start. You sound like you haven't had a lot of sex/don't understand the mechanics at play here. People who are having sex with a non-relationship partner usually wear condoms b/c they protect against STD…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:53 AM
1

Do you have to be the quantifiable best to be confident?
/r/seduction24/07/22 12:25 AM
3

....you mean he
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:24 PM
-3

As someone who has worked in the entertainment industry, I literally don't believe that you actually do. Feels fabricated to me for a number of reasons. Do you have any evidence that you actually have first hand experience in this industry?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 06:00 AM
-5

It seems that incels do not like this term anymore.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:34 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:22 AM
1

If you want to make someone smile tip them, don't act entitled to their performative enthusiasm. Gender aside. Service workers get paid dog shit and it's not their job to make you feel special, just take your plate and supplement their meager income. You'd be frowning too if you made $2.13 an hour and entitled pricks refused to pay the tips your lowered minimum wage was predicated on because you didn't blow sunshine up their ass. Tips are not elective or designed as a performance review as they …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:23 PM
-5

"I had a dehumanizing experience that made me miserable, everyone else should have to do that too"
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:12 PM
-1

Just about nothing more SDE then getting really defensive over someone using the term "SDE." For real though, I know some men with small dicks who have BDE for days. Women don't actually care that much about dick size, (and this). Having paper thin confidence about your dick size is another story ;)
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:31 PM
0

Same reason you don't see the NAACP complaining that there aren't enough black Janitors... ....because those are the competitive jobs that greatly empower those who have them and everyone wants them.... How is this even a question?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:59 PM
1

6 is such a low/normal amount of people to have slept with... The average in the United States for adults is 7.2 iirc ​ If y'all can't get over women having a below average number of previous partners, I guess you'll just have to go without...
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:32 PM
1

It's strange because I mostly see extremely hostile rhetoric in the comments section of this sub. I track this sub pretty closely and I'd say ~80% of what gets posted is posting crazy, man-hating stuff (screenshots of DMs, reddit comments, memes some idiot made, etc), and claiming that it's representative of the general opinions of feminism/western culture. There's also a lot of anecdote, (e.g., "all the feminists I know...," "why does every feminist I know...") Please go ahead and look at the f…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:32 AM
-5

"The patriarchy benefits men and women who were born with power"? I mean, power benefits men and women born with power. The patriarchy by definition consists of systems which disproportionately benefit men.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 08:58 PM
-2

That's not what the feminist community says at all. The patriarchy doesn't benefit most men. The gender roles forced on men are mostly harmful to most men. It strictly benefits men who were born with power. Other men are mostly harmed by the expectations set forth.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:42 PM
-11

Yeah, ngl, it's kind of fucked up to be like, "The reason I can't be rude is because there's just too many many women in the field"
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:39 PM
-3

No he didn't, he stayed a safe distance from the front lines I'm sure you can pull some example of some king that engaged in combat or claimed to. It's a rare exception, not the rule and DEFINITELY isn't evidence that "Male rulers don't start wars because they're scared of dying in combat." C'mon, you're smarter than that, everyone even 3-4 degrees of connection away from rulers are generally exempt from compulsory combat risks, that's just how hierarchy works.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:18 PM
-7

You think kings went and fought in wars personally? wtf are you talking about?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:58 PM
3

You say, "Damn, maybe I should stop playing childish games and maybe cultivate a genuine and kind personality that attracts people instead of foolishly trying to manipulate women into having sex with me by putting them down." That shit don't work, son. You're not being smart and everyone sees through your bs. Be nice.
/r/seduction28/06/22 11:08 PM
1

This post is an deprived response to a fake problem
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:01 PM
3

Sure, let's fight for both. Support for abortion isn't in conflict with this.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:56 PM
24

As a man who comes here to mostly play devils advocate and argue the feminist side of things, I REALLY appreciate that about /r/mensrights. I have plenty of critical things to say about y'all, but the mods here do NOT take down my posts when I voice an opinion that's clearly unpopular here. I got permabanned from /r/feminsm for literally telling someone that not all sex workers are prostitutes, and that we should support sex workers/rework the system rather than persecute them (seems like a pret…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:06 AM
-5

idk, I'd think it was pretty funny if someone got these for me. It's a much funnier joke in a private hottub than, say, a waterpark where you're a 10 minute walk from your pants XD ​ Seriously, though, just take a joke, y'all. There are all kinds of dissolving, edible, tear away clothes for all genders. It's a prank and it can be used for a good-natured gag or horrendous bullying depending on who's using it
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:43 PM
1

This is actually what's commonly referred to as "rejection," the way to deal with it is to learn to accept it as quickly as possible. Do this and you'll save more of your time for people who are interested in talking to you.
/r/seduction17/06/22 01:11 AM
0

Yes they would, because that's what feminism means.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:40 PM
0

Feminism is a more specific form of egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:00 PM
1

Not trolling, I agree, it's pretty simple. The TL;DR is that Feminism is not a monolith it's a diverse cluster of belief systems and social movements, but the fundamental uniting aim of feminism is gender equality as asserted nearly ubiquitously by high-profile organizers and thought leaders, as well as generally when self-identified feminists are polled to ask what it means for them. You can argue that groups within feminism aren't effective towards the goal, but the statement: "All women who g…
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:55 AM
0

ok
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:50 AM
0

All women who genuinely want equality, are /not/ feminists. They are equalists. Equality and feminism are mutually exclusive Some guy above you.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 12:49 AM
-2

This is as defined by feminist thought leaders and movement leaders See citations...
/r/MensRights15/06/22 11:56 PM
-8

All women who genuinely want equality, are /not/ feminists. They are equalists. Equality and feminism are mutually exclusive Hey genius, here's the definition of feminism from Wikipedia: Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes. ​ This is as defined by feminist thought leaders and movement leaders, although I guess you can make up definitions if you want: https://en.wikiped…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 11:10 PM
-8

Toxic masculinity suggests the problems men face or not systemic within our society, but in their heads, solved by a mere change of male mindset. I always hear this from people who haven't bothered reading about what the term toxic masculinity actually means. From wikipedia: The concept of toxic masculinity is used in academic and media discussions of masculinity to refer to certain cultural norms that are associated with harm to society and men themselves. Traditional stereotypes of men as soci…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:23 PM
1

Bro why would you tip someone for bringing you water. Who does that. Do you not know how restaurants work? You tip with the bill... You're going to raise some eyebrows any time you start just trying to give people money out of context when they're not asking for it.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 07:37 PM
1

Glad someone understands
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:14 AM
-9

Nonsense. The court has higher standards for guilty verdict than innocent, and it should. Guilt demands proof. Innocence merely demands insufficient proof. Insufficient proof does not constitute proof of a contrapositive. This is the basics of law, innocent until proven guilty. That doesn't mean not guilty == proven innocent.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 05:55 AM
-5

I said reputable studies. When you have to reach back 25 years to cherry-pick a study that supports your conjecture, I think you have to question whether you're letting yourself be convinced by evidence or looking for evidence to rationalize a pre-existing opinion. is associated... clear correlation I never denied association or correlation, in fact I specifically acknowledged it and differentiated it from causality. I also never asserted that it attacks single mothers, merely that we shouldn't …
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:08 AM
0

ok
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:33 AM
2

Fatherlessness is bad for all kinds of reasons, but let's not jump to conclusions. Sociologists generally do not find a significant correlation between fatherlessness and propensity to mass shootings when normalizing for household income and early exposure to violence. It's like saying that "eating food purchased with food stamps causes mass shootings." Yes, there's a correlation, but there's no evidence for causality. The united states is squarely in the middle when it comes to family integrity…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:30 AM
0

ok
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:02 PM
0

Those last few men are going to have a great time, though.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:48 PM
-5

This is kind of a stupid hill to die on. The basic rule is leave shared spaces how you found them, in a default configuration most suited to the the likely needs of the next person who walks in. Men sit down to poop too.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:58 PM
1

Gently guide their face into a position/angle where your lips align.
/r/seduction09/06/22 04:52 PM
20

My golden secret: If you want to just go for it, what you do is just lean in really slow, gently turn their head towards you, and hover over their mouth for a second, draw out the moment rubbing cheeks and the corner of your lips for a second and lightly hold their neck. People love this. That way you give them a chance to say no, while also being alpha af and building out the tension for a really hot make out sesh. After just 2-3 seconds (it'll seem like forever) as long as they're responding i…
/r/seduction09/06/22 12:54 AM
-3

I don't really see much evidence presented here that feminism has caused the effects you claim. There's a lot of money being made off of this misguided rage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94\_5mXsQTpA&ab\_channel=AdamSomething
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:55 AM
1

ik you don't want to hear this, but worrying about what women think is the last thing you need to be doing to work on your confidence. Find something you're interested in and passionate about and pursue it relentlessly. Especially great if it's something social. Engineering can be a very inward discipline, so it's good to balance with something active and social. Confidence (and women) will come through your accomplishments.
/r/seduction02/06/22 11:01 PM
-14

1000%, let's push back against this dummy talk. This is not what feminism is. You're not helping people by saying so, just alienating people who would probably agree with each other.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:57 PM
-14

Are you genuinely asking or just venting? ​ I've never heard someone say this in response to general venting. Where it comes up is when we bring up specific instances of rejection or act with frustration towards someone for not being interested. Are you bringing up these general frustrations to a single woman who you don't know well? Because that could understandably be perceived as frustration that they're not interested in you. Are you bringing this up by listing qualities of yourself that you…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:56 PM
4

Um. Are you black? If not, you should stop talking to them and go do something else.
/r/seduction26/05/22 07:25 PM
-29

So is this sub about advocating for men systemically, or just bringing up every time a woman does something shitty?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:23 PM
-1

lol no they don't. If Coke's COO came out and said "our products don't contribute to diabetes" would anyone change their mind about doing business with them? Hell no. That's what you expect them to say. You either don't make decisions around these issues because you don't care about them, or you care and you don't take the company's word for it. Only an idiot has their concerns assuaged by a company rep's word (and one who's uninvolved, gimme a break).
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:54 PM
5

Wrong sub, you'll get nothing but misogynistic bullocks talk here. ​ Truth, there's really 3-5 steps. Hover at whatever conversation he's in, and just find comfort at the outskirts and listen to the conversation. This is the part people have the most trouble with usually. Just wait until you have something you genuinely want to ask a question about. Talk to him & whoever about whatever they're interested in, try to find a common interest. At some point, give him a complement while making eye con…
/r/seduction24/05/22 09:28 PM
1

Irrelevant... She's not personally involved in the alleged incident in any way and has every incentive to align herself with the company's interests... Who cares what she thinks about it?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:33 PM
-2

I think you misspelled "squats"
/r/seduction21/05/22 12:15 AM
5

Here's the reality: Don't worry about gamifying your relations with other people. Take sex out of the center stage of your goals and, seriously, stop watching porn if you are. Work on being a person you're proud to be and having a healthy and active social life. Confidence will come with this. So will sex. But if you do this, you'll find that the validation /catharsis you've been seeking from sex is a minor perk relative to the other things you'll gain.
/r/seduction19/05/22 04:16 PM
-2

woosh
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:34 PM
-6

"Not all men hurdurdur"
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:33 PM
2

All worker ants are female. Whoever wrote this is a moron.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 05:33 PM
2

Where’s the best place to find a guy that’s to my ideal? Well, what does your "ideal guy" do? Is he nerdy? Start going to board game events. Is he athletic? Play a sport. Is he well read? Go to book clubs. If you meet somewhere that's not a bar or a party, where you can be friends first and bond over shared interests, that's when you make a real emotional connection that's not superficial. ​ Pro tip: if you're only talking to guys who talk to you first, it DRASTICALLY increases the chances that …
/r/seduction18/05/22 04:08 PM
2

Female sexuality is much more associated with emotion, energy, connection, less so with visuals. Romance novels provide this. A notable consistency in Romance novels is the chase; the male interest is almost always ambivalent to the woman (or seems like he might be at first), but still demonstrates vulnerability, authenticity, trustworthiness while keeping her at arms length. A key part of arousal for many women (and men too!) is feeling desired, for women I believe it matters more that the desi…
/r/seduction15/05/22 02:30 AM
1

I mean. It's not sexual, though. Wut.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:09 AM
1

"I think I'm an authority on the hatred in a majority of lesbians' hearts" - Some guy who knows like 2 lesbians tops
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:05 AM
-12

Some lesbian on an explicitly lesbian forum: "Men are gross, not attracted to 'em" Mens rights guy: "Discrimination!" Lesbian: "uh....."
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:09 PM
1

We constantly hear about... It's funny, I constantly hear a lot of different opinions from different organizations and people without synthesizing them into a single, inconsistent hypocrite. ​ I'm all in favor for calling out hypocrisy, but hypocrisy applies to a single, inconsistent entity. When you juxtapose sentiments from different people and call it hypocrisy it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 06:54 PM
1

Not sure what's gained by putting words in people's mouths, feminism has always been open to men. Also the "no uterus no opinion" line is some protest lingo about bodily autonomy, it's not an agreed upon rhetorical thesis. "Other people shouldn't tell me what to do with my uterus" isn't the same as saying "people with uteruses SHOULD tell me what to do with my uterus" or "as long as most of the 30% of people who are anti-choice are women, it's fine."
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:38 PM
-9

/r/mensrights should just be called "anti-feminism". There are many philosophies which espouse rights for men. Including feminism.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:49 PM
3

It's wild to me that this sub constantly compares sentiments from different people as if it's a single person expressing hypocritical contradictions. Different people have different sentiments... What's surprising about this...?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:35 AM
0

I think it's kind of a cool idea. I played this on a date and it went ok: https://www.werenotreallystrangers.com/ We were at a board game cafe though lol. Definitely pick something that's a talking game and not a strategy game.
/r/seduction09/05/22 03:45 AM
11

Love this comment. Fucking asked and answered.
/r/seduction09/05/22 03:43 AM
4

Bro, no. Go to a bar. No one is sending you signals at the gym, they're there to do a thing.
/r/seduction07/05/22 02:09 PM
17

Easy, keep making friends and meeting people in groups until you find someone you're both attracted to and have resonant world-views/common interests with. You'll get there. Then go to a therapist and trying to work on your confidence and negative self-talk. If you're thinking of yourself as inferior, you'll tolerate shit you shouldn't, and you aren't inferior, it's a cognitive distortion. Ranking human beings is a toxic modern delusion.
/r/seduction01/05/22 07:05 PM
-4

Wut. Literally EVERYONE had suicidal thoughts.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:21 PM
1

lol yeah, I'm in agreement
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:43 PM
1

The phrasing "An actual gender non-conforming man" gives the connotation that the writer doesn't believe that gender non-conformity is legitimate, which would be highly unusual for someone who considers themselves a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 10:32 PM
1

That's not even remotely what 'no true scotsman' is, though. 'No true scotsman' would be if I provided a broad generalization, you provided a counterexample, and I dismissed it by moving the goalpost. ​ I'm not claiming that there's no feminist in the world who believes this, nor did you provide a counter example to such a claim, I'm disputing the implication that it's representative generally of feminist belief. I am also pointing out that no evidence was provided that this picture was authored…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 07:47 PM
0

Again, y'all just pull up a random meme and act like it speaks for all of feminism. It'd be one thing if this was authored by a major feminist theorist or cultural leader, or if there was evidence that this represents an opinion held commonly by feminists. This is just a random, un-cited meme, that you're claiming a wide cultural movement believes with the title. In fact, a quick google lens search reveals that this is the only place this image has been posted and components of it were taken fro…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 07:35 PM
-1

dailymail.co.uk/news/a... This article discusses teaching about "incel culture" (i.e. communities who self-denote as incels) in an academic context. I don't see anywhere in the posted article where it is used pejoratively.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 08:08 PM
2

Nice to meet someone who acknowledges the nuance :) ​ It's very beneficial for politicians to polarize people on social issues, and a lot of money is spent on this. It distracts from fucking everyone over on the issues we all mostly agree on.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:51 PM
4

Using it as an insult is one thing. But also ‘incel’ is a self-described term for lots of Internet communities, and it is definitely an Internet subculture. The people in these communities made up that term for themselves. This is the sense of the word being used here.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:31 PM
2

For sure, sincerely thank you for your respectful response. I did appreciate you editing to more realistically taper the wording. I also appreciate that the mods do not overtly censor this sub like some other far-right leaning subs, despite polar and controversial comment threads. Ime, though, posts with the most inflammatory and conspiratorial language in this sub that make wildly unfounded claims with no supporting evidence get upvoted while posts tempering that narrative get downvoted.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 05:00 PM
0

This is my problem with a lot of posts on this sub. If you attribute all dissent from your opinion to conspiratorial behavior that you provide no evidence for, I don't know how anyone can take your opinion seriously. I look at it, and say, "this person just makes up conspiracies to explain someone disagreeing with them, therefore if they were wrong about a bias they would be unlikely to disprove themselves by open-mindedly considering evidence from the other side since they've decided that any e…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 01:24 PM
0

Yeah, the UN is totally organizing this whole thing because of their radical hatred of men.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:21 AM
-3

Nah, not necessarily. Forced breeding is much less common and way less publicly defensible than conscription. "we need as many people as possible to fight or we'll all die horrible deaths" feels much more compellingly urgent than "we need everyone to breed so our economy can recover in a couple decades". Especially so since fertility rates tend to be high without any additional incentive, provided that there are enough women in good enough health. It's a macroeconomic/demographic phenomenon and …
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:16 AM
-1

Nice, you got me
/r/MensRights14/04/22 01:06 AM
-2

Thank you for taking the time to hash out your opinion so respectfully :) I didn't say adult women don't have the same duty, I think they do, generally. The justification I usually hear from a policy perspective is that women tend to be the bottleneck for post-war repopulation (because gestation) and, when it comes to choosing between man or woman in hetero couples who flee with kids, women have the breast milk and men trend stronger and faster (though, I agree a "choose one parent to stay and f…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:11 PM
-6

Yeah, I think able bodied women should have to fight too unless they want to get their kids out. That's up to Ukraine though. Women are the bottle neck for post-war population replenishing, and men tend to be faster and stronger, so it's a justifiable stance from a macro perspective.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:55 PM
2

100% Russian propaganda
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:34 PM
0

Fair enough, I'm sure there are more diverse opinions here than that
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:32 PM
-30

This is coward talk. If they don't want to enlist, they can live the rest of their lives in a different country. Skirting duty has consequences. Should rich Ukrainian men be able to wait out the war while women, children and the elderly are being raped, tortured and killed, schools and hospitals are being bombed, then return after the danger has left? Their country is in danger of no longer existing with everyone within it meeting a terrible fate. Ukraine did not ask for this, but if you're capa…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:31 PM
-14

"A new low for Ukraine"
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:10 PM
-35

/r/mensrights is anti-Ukraine? That's pretty on-brand...
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:56 PM
-1

I think it's a mixture of people and ideologies. I'm more of a lurker, but I have a good sense of what sentiments gets exchanged here. I can only judge /r/mensrights by how it is moderated and what sort of sentiments are upvoted, and in this sense it is very much akin to an incel sub/alt-right sub in ideology. While there really are a blend of ideologies here, and I appreciate that contrary opinions are not explicitly censored, I think perspectives that generalize and express anger and resentmen…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:17 AM
1

Oh definitely not, you'll feel it less and it will increase your risk of sexual dysfunction https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322056383_Adding_Insult_to_Injury_Acquisition_of_Erectile_Dysfunction_from_Circumcision
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:31 AM
3

Eh. Heroic, but not exclusive to masculinity. Women go hard to save kids too. Not really sure if this is on topic.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 06:50 PM
-1

jfc this is bogus. Your friend sounds like someone who's afraid of women, hates women, and has probably never gotten laid himself. Women don't want to randomly accuse someone they had consensual sex with of rape. It's a dragged out court battle, typically including a lot of privacy invasion and character assassination on her, and involves her whole family in the intimate interrogation of her sex life. Getting a rape kit is uncomfortable and awkward af. They gain nothing, there's no profit, just …
/r/MensRights24/03/22 03:57 PM
-7

I’ve never heard anyone make the argument you’re arguing against. Do you have any sources for someone publicly making this case? Feels like a strawman, tbh.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:42 PM
4

https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/FAQ#:\~:text=Unlike%20other%20top%20websites%2C%20Wikipedia,donation%20being%20about%20%2415%20USD.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 07:20 PM
-18

What part of this do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:03 PM
2

Verifiably incorrect.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:03 PM
15

No-one gets paid, it’s completely volunteer/ community run.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:02 PM
1

Not sure what your point is
/r/MensRights13/03/22 08:38 PM
1

No.
/r/seduction09/10/21 06:08 PM
1

That's not it at all, bruv
/r/seduction14/08/21 05:40 AM
4

Jesus, this sub get's it wrong. Yes, for fucks sake, be friends with women, but all your reasoning is backwards and toxic. Op, it turns out that women are full-on human beings, equipped with stories, skills, interests, hobbies, feelings, and intrinsic human worth which make them worthy of friendship outside of the context of a distilled list of beneficial usages centered around getting you laid. I have (I think I counted 4?) friends I actively spend time with and talk to regularly who are women …
/r/seduction30/07/21 06:31 PM
2

Looks like "he will kill me" was googled 1886 times this year, so you're both pretty wrong. ​ You have to add them up in the CSV to get the total times it was googled, otherwise you're getting how much it was googled in a day. ​ Why not actually get an accurate number if you're going to fact check someone on something so easily measured?
/r/MensRights30/04/21 07:24 PM
2

Where's my man-changing station, damnit.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 10:23 PM
-3

Serious question, what makes you think any of those are 'anti-white male'? White male here, not at all threatened/triggered by learning about any of these things. I don't think that they're any more useless than 'general studies' or PE credits.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:51 PM
2

Which college
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:40 PM
1

k
/r/MensRights29/07/19 03:53 PM
2

There are basically no laws preventing revenge porn, which is what this might technically be considered since they consented to give her the pictures but not to have them posted. ​ Pro tip: Don't be a fucking idiot and send your nudes to a random stranger online unless you're OK with making them public
/r/MensRights28/07/19 06:55 PM
1

The punishment for violent crimes should not be the same as defamation, no.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 06:29 PM
1

She's used words pretty carelessly here, but if what she means is that losing a court case alleging sexual assault shouldn't be a criminal offense punishable by jail time thats... fine... Defamation is a civil tort, not a criminal offense (and it should be). If the accusation can it can be proven as willful libel in a subpoena, it can result in fines/financial rectification for damages caused (and often does, already). In general, though, sexual assault cases are often dropped from insufficient …
/r/MensRights27/07/19 06:09 AM
1

Damn, man. You could've just said "Men report being upset about their bodies at similar rates of women, from 15% to 40%". ​ Mic drop. Nuff said. Fact speaks for itself. ​ It would've been strong, cited and salient. Not to mention respectful enough for people who disagreed or were unsure to actually read and internalize. ​ Not sure why people feel the need to drown a perfectly measured 1-fact retort with tantrum-sauce....
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:15 PM
2

Meh, I don't think she's saying men need to apologize for existing, just being aware if you're trailing someone closely at night with noone around to give them space. Men or women. ​ Who hasn't wondered if someone's going to mug/rape them in a situation where there's only one other person on the street at night walking close behind them. It's not a matter of absolving yourself of guilt, but relieving the other person of a frightening ambiguity
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:47 PM
1

I'm honestly interested, I'd be happy to ​ EDIT: If anyone's curious: https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/buw9j4/this_was_posted_to_rmensrights_what/
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:49 PM
1

You're making some really strong, dubious, broad generalizations without any backing facts. "Building maintain or advancing civilisation" (It's 'civilization', by the way) is an extremely broad category of occupations and I highly doubt you could find two people who agree on what that encompasses. You're moving the goalpost beyond where either of us can see it or measure it and claiming that macroscopic data is "probably there" which would make your case. Anecdotal evidence is relevant as a coun…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:36 AM
1

You're moving the goalposts significantly here and arguing about something I've just explicitly agreed with. ​ Her quote is ">90% of the individuals who build and maintain the whole shebang," which doesn't mean ">90% of people working physically demanding and dangerous jobs" it means 90% of people working the hard and necessary jobs which maintain society. "Hard" here doesn't necessarily mean physically demanding. I'm a male engineer, I stay up all night on too much caffeine pulling my hair out …
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:59 AM
26

I think if you really care about men's rights, you have to be critical about this kind of argument, because it's riddled with fallacy and faulty logic, even if you agree the conclusion that men deserve respect (and hell yeah, they do!) ​ I just don't think it's reasonable to assign responsibility OR entitlement based on membership of a gender. You don't want to be scorned as part of the 'rapist gender' just because some men are rapists, right? It goes both ways-- just as I, a man, don't deserve …
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:19 PM
2

THIS. Honestly, hats off and so much respect to you, /u/shitcrap7. So many women go around thinking all men are pieces of shit because the only interactions come from the creepy/aggressive/entitled/psychopathic guys who approach them. It's ironic; the good guys are mostly the ones who are respecting your space and not treating you like a game to be won. You probably don't necessarily want someone shy/awkward/unassertive, but there are probably a lot of guys like me who are just conscientious abo…
/r/seduction09/04/19 05:16 PM
1

Awfully presumptuous of you.
/r/seduction08/04/19 11:54 PM
4

If a woman isn't interested in dating/fucking you, there's no right answer here. When you get "I'm not really looking for anything right now" that doesn't mean, "you should've asked me over instead" it means, "no thanks." If you're finding yourself micromanaging how you're asking women out, or reading way too much into their responses, you're way over investing in women you don't really know and it's a sign that you're projecting/giving too many fucks about this area of life and need to be more …
/r/seduction06/01/19 06:37 AM
3

I feel like everyone goes through this-- honestly, this might not be the sub to find the kind of support you need on it. /r/meditation is a good place to go to wane cravings. Reading 'The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck' is a good way to reevaluate your values, where they come from and how to reshape them. ​ Your problem, obviously, is a craving. It's a craving associated with loss. Cravings are always a disconnect between an idealized reality the true reality that exists around you. The key to …
/r/seduction04/01/19 09:30 PM
2

I don't agree that it is... hence my above statement...? STEM, in general, is more competitive and exclusive than other disciplines. People don't get pigeon-holed into STEM because they got turned down from everything else.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 09:22 PM
-10

Is this upsetting to you? Then go get educated in one of those fields. You think there's systemic bias preventing you from gaining access to those fields? I'd like to hear from someone who has tried. Correlation isn't causality. The stem fields generally have higher median salaries and better working conditions. I say this as someone who has gone through engineering graduate school. Most people I know in STEM did so because they knew they could and that it would afford them a better life. I don'…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 05:06 PM
13

Just compliment them on specific things you actually appreciate and only if you're on that level of friendship with them where you know you won't be making them uncomfortable. Better Yet, try complimenting their work and trying them like a professional before going right to their appearance. It's that easy, never had a problem with this.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:32 PM
-14

A perfect champion for the cause, such a respected intellectual figure.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 02:20 AM
0

I hear what you're saying and I respect it. I have a counterpoint, and I hope you'll read it with open-mindedness and patience. Let's stick with just the law at hand for now, that one woman Do you think that less women are, in general, less smart/hard working than men? If not, why do you suppose that a corporate board of ~9 (average board size) would not have a single woman on it naturally? Your statement relies heavily on the assumption that boards are a meritocracy, but we all know that's ridi…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:17 AM
1

I don't disagree with you-- I'm a supporter of affirmative action and related policies. Only difference in this instance is that women are ~50% of the general population whereas the other groups you mentioned are less. What do you think would be a good policy to promote and empower marginalized groups in company structures? Why do you think these groups don't occupy positions of power in companies right now?
/r/MensRights12/10/18 02:38 AM
-8

Why are you so threatened? This literally requires one woman on boards. Another way of saying it is that boards cannot be all men. True, a law forbidding boards from being all women would make this more fair (and I personally would prefer the symmetrical law), but how many corporate boards are all women currently? I couldn't find any major ones, maybe you could procure a few outlier samples, but it isn't statistically significant. Choose your battles, brother.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 01:26 PM
6

Does being pro-mom mean being anti-dad?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 02:29 AM
1

I think the trick is to eat a lot of hair before the date and every time she says a proper noun just make a face like you're constipated and cry a little.
/r/seduction31/08/18 04:04 AM
3

What. You're thinking of 3rd degree murder. 2nd is non-premeditated, intentional.... But also that's a US distinction so I don't know what the original commenter meant.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 02:39 AM
3

but it's a noun, not a pronoun...
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:29 PM
7

Because one looks consensual and in the other one she's asleep?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:03 PM
0

Thank you. Christ. Not a competition.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 02:42 PM
1

Usually because one of them uses force
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:20 AM
2

Yes PigCunt is where I get all my news. Or am I thinking of Alex Jones or Glenn Beck... Always mix those up
/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:51 PM
0

This guy goes to my university and I've been following the story in detail. The police recovered a notebook from his house describing in detail his fascination with rape, instances of him raping women, and his strategies for getting away with it. More than 12 women have come out against him including women he was not romantically involved with, just studying with etc., raped sober and uninvolved. I honestly don't believe OP and most commenters even read this article, at no point does she claim t…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 05:22 PM
-7

Sorry, op, you're super wrong and you're making us look bad. Female circumcision (often known as female genital mutilation or FGM) often refers partial or complete removal of the clitoris or labia, and it's often done with the intention of ensuring that the victims will never derive pleasure from sex. So it's more akin to cutting off the head of your penis than your foreskin. If you're thinking about removing the hood of the clitoris, this isn't widely performed and it's a straw man to set it up…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 05:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter