TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YanksFan Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by YanksFan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Abortion is pills and procedure. Personhood establishes who gets rights, as evidenced by the Constitution and multiple human rights organizations. Rights are granted through citizenship, which happens at birth; hence birthright citizenship. The state cannot define the zef as a person, because personhood and rights are established at birth. A zef can have all the rights it wants, but it can't want anything because to want higher brain function is required. A zef doesn't have higher brain function…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 07:23 PM
1

Birth control failure isn’t rape
/r/MensRights04/01/22 02:47 PM
0

Birth control failure isn’t rape.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:12 PM
1

Birth control failure isn’t rape.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:56 AM
1

Birth control failure isn’t rape. Do you understand that, or is that beyond you as well?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:57 AM
0

In your mind, birth control failure is the same as rape; that isn’t realistic.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:50 AM
0

Basic facts that if a zef is an individual and gets rights, removal from the woman at any time is not an issue. If it is not, nothing can use someone else’s organs without consent.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:48 AM
1

I have to repeat, because basis facts elude you.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:12 PM
1

An abortion is pills or a procedure, in fact, that all we are discussing. Women control their organs all the time. If a zef is an individual, then removal at any point in time is fine. If it is not, nothing can use another’s organs. It is that simple. The zef can do whatever it can without the use of a woman’s body. It has that right. As long as you are in denial of basic facts, then you cannot
/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:11 PM
0

Medical procedures and pills are not arbitrary. They are used when required.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:55 AM
1

There is no murder. There is no murder. There is no murder. Changing the meaning of rape means that you don't understand rape.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:54 AM
0

Abortion is limited to a woman and her medical care provider, that's it.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:42 AM
0

No one is murdered. You don't understand rape either. Is there a legal concept that you do understand?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:38 AM
0

Murder is a legal concept. You still don't see it. I understand that you don't understand it still, because you keep attempting to make an independent person the same as a zef, it is not analogous. You keep failing spectacularly.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:36 AM
0

When you get pregnant, I support abortion for you. There is no murder. You have to lie because you have neither morals nor ethics.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:32 AM
0

There are no murdered children. That is emotionally laden garbage. You are over-emotional because women are in control of all of their own organs all of the time. Now because you are mad, you are deflecting. Women control their own organs, and nothing has a right to those organs.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:22 AM
0

Murder is a legal concept. I see that you don't understand that either.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:13 AM
0

You can't do anything to me, and consent is still a concept that is beyond you. When you get pregnant, I support abortion for you too. I understand that you can only use emotional language because you are upset that women are not walking incubators. We have already established that zefs are not people. Would you like a match for your strawman?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:07 AM
0

When the zef doesn't need another’s organs, it can do whatever it likes; then there is the fact that it can't like anything because there is no higher brain function. You should be familiar with that.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 07:54 AM
1

No personhood is required, which is established by the state; and it doesn't apply to a zef.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:50 PM
1

The unborn cannot use anyone’s organs, if it is an individual, removal at any point shouldn't be a problem. If it isn't and depends on someone else, there is consent required. Glad you understand now.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:37 PM
1

Nope, we have established that no one has the right to another’s organs. Pretty sure you can't perform a medical procedure or prescribe medication, so you couldn't perform an abortion. Better luck next time.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:03 AM
1

So you can't abort me, abortion is a medical procedure. No human has the right to another’s organs.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 03:27 PM
1

When you have hyperemesis and are going through preeclampsia, perhaps you can use that argument.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:41 PM
1

Miscarriages happen all the time. Conception isn’t special. I was a fetus, that is a developmental stage, and I was born when my mother had the choice as to what to do with her body.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:39 PM
0

When you get pregnant, you can have a physical abortion too.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:40 PM
1

Abortion ends a pregnancy. Men are now getting pregnant?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:23 PM
1

He said that he thinks it is a good thing. Perhaps you should pick better heroes.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:17 PM
1

Milo wants to normalize it. The deflection from a proponent of this is demoralizing.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:23 PM
3

She is single, but popping out kids from a guy with a 14 page rap sheet. She has a 9 month old, and is pregnant with a 2nd by the felon. She has a history of poly-substance abuse. Her winner of a boyfriend has multiple charges of DV and child abuse. It just sucks. If it was a guy, she's been in jail. Her rights would've been terminated and I could adopt the child that I have been raising with my husband for the past 4 years.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:28 PM
8

My husband has 100% custody of his daughter. He has had at least 80% custody for 4 years. The child's mother hasn't paid anything in that time. She is currently living in her parent's basement and therefore has no real expenses. She works full time. She still pays nothing.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:21 PM
1

Watch Click, which is the Adam Sandler version of this movies.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:21 AM
-1

If no one pursues justice, how can it be anyone's fault?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:49 PM
2

The safety and well being of the kiddos needs to come first.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 04:05 PM
11

Actually depending on the state, if she keeps the kid it is a felony. I know in Colorado; interfering with parenting time is a felony.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 01:18 PM
4

On April Fool's day, hey guys think about it.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:24 PM
0

By equating a dog with a human, it just shows you have a general disregard for everything. Personally I think that both men and women should be allowed and have be be accepted that they can go around without shirts.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:32 PM
1

What is disgusting about a human body?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:40 AM
2

When it is hot outside, men can walk around without a shirt and that is totally acceptable. Women get scrutinized for breastfeeding in public.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:25 AM
1

I was just talking about a situation that I know about, not your situation.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:33 AM
5

This person's ex took the rent and spent it on drugs, while they were still married. The ex commited fraud by writing checks on closed accounts.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:10 PM
20

It is called domestic theft. Someone I know got almost 100k stolen from them over 10 years being married.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:43 PM
-1

Would care to explain why you'd pop a woody because a woman is feeding her infant?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:12 PM
-1

The purpose for female mammals to have breast is to feed young.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:12 PM
-1

A tit is a means of feeding one's young. Just because you have hypersexualized a breast doesn't take away from its intent.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:32 PM
0

There isn't a context where a mother feeding her child is lewd.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:25 AM
0

Breastfeeding isn't lewd.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:54 PM
-1

So some breasts are lewd and some aren't. A nipple is a nipple.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:37 PM
-1

So in that school, if a boy is playing basketball; shirts and skins; is that indecent?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 02:57 PM
-1

Why are breasts indecent?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 03:48 AM
0

And you can get arrested for harassment or disturbing the peace.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 03:46 AM
3

The government is involved because marriage is a contract.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:58 PM
2

Actually I was expressing my true disagreement. Using themes that you believe are in a book when you've never read the book is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:46 PM
2

I had a valid criticism that you didn't like. You say that a book condones abuse when you never read it. The Rules have little to nothing to do with today's culture. I think that ferreting out an obsolete book, that you've never read detracts from real issues; ie the family court and judicial system in general.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:29 PM
2

I read the book 20 years ago when it had some relevance. The men are "targeted" the same way PUA target women. Do you believe that PUAs abuse women?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:59 PM
2

You are pointing out a book that hasn't had influence for about 20 years. Why not focus on the real problems like in the family courts, instead of an imaginary abuse from a book that doesn't hold any sway anymore. In 20 years do you think that 50 shades of grey is going to matter?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:34 PM
2

Why not actually stick to what I said, my critique of your statement is that you haven't read the book. You admit it, so how can you complain about a book, and it's themes if you haven't read it? You seem to be whining 3rd hand, which isn't good for this movement. Vyyanne didn't post in this reddit whining, you did. OP will get the criticism when you make an ill formed 3rd hand argument. Do PUA abuse women? This rather silly book that was published and popular years ago really has little to do w…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:19 PM
2

Well actually I have read it, which is why I feel and felt justified in asking you if you'd done the same.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:19 AM
3

Writing a critique on the themes of a book, it might be better to have actually read the material you are critiquing.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:34 AM
2

Then no, you haven't read it. What you are basing your opinion on is second hand. If you've ever done a book report in school, you'd know that reading the material is essential.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:01 AM
4

Did you read the book? If not, how can you make that assessment?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter