YeahSorry Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	r/MGTOW just got removed. Is Reddit's Moderators biased towards blue-pilled ideas? The top of this thread asked for a legal opinion and I gave one..............	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/01/20 07:50 PM
2	r/MGTOW just got removed. Is Reddit's Moderators biased towards blue-pilled ideas? It’s not though. MGTOW expresses a viewpoint. And Reddit doesn’t have to allow that viewpoint. Any law that attempted to force them to use their capital to help express a specific viewpoint would violate the first amendment. You aren’t going to find a case that supports your argument because you are wrong on the law. And given the number of users, there would definitely be a lawsuit if Reddit was violating the civil rights of hundreds of thousands of people.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/01/20 07:22 PM
1	r/MGTOW just got removed. Is Reddit's Moderators biased towards blue-pilled ideas? Okay, well if you’re right then I am sure Reddit will be sued into the ground.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/01/20 07:14 PM
1	r/MGTOW just got removed. Is Reddit's Moderators biased towards blue-pilled ideas? Okay, well I disagree. I am not going to analyze your new hypotheticals. I am an attorney with experience handling civil rights cases. That is the basis for my opinion. Please cite a statute or law that you think Reddit is violating.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/01/20 07:09 PM
2	r/MGTOW just got removed. Is Reddit's Moderators biased towards blue-pilled ideas? There are laws that prohibit gender discrimination in the work place. Gender discrimination in the workplace is not protected by the First Amendment. There are no laws prohibiting the exercise of free speech by a private company such as Reddit. Reddit can ban anything they want for any reason or no reason.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/01/20 06:32 PM
0	r/MGTOW just got removed. Is Reddit's Moderators biased towards blue-pilled ideas? It’s not. People and corporations have a right to free speech. That means that they don’t have to offer up their platform to others of differing viewpoints. Nor do they have to explain their reasoning.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/01/20 06:06 PM
-2	Should women pursue men? Man this is cringe. All of this comment.	/r/RedPillWomen	07/10/19 12:29 PM
1	How did you do it? Burrrrrn! Nice one!	/r/Divorce_Men	31/10/17 02:15 AM
0	How did you do it? Did you try calling the waaaaaaaaambulance?	/r/Divorce_Men	31/10/17 01:56 AM
2	How did you do it? Username checks out. The court won't pursue it because the courts don't really pursue anything. But opposing counsel might. And incendiary lies will make the divorce and the future relationship infinitely worse. If caught lying, you will desperately wish you hadn't. Don't do it.	/r/Divorce_Men	30/10/17 11:01 PM
4	How did you do it? I don't think lying to the courts is a good idea at all. Perjury is criminal, and if caught, you can expect to lose all credibility with the court. Don't do it. Get your things moved so they can't be thrown on the lawn. Secure all your financial papers, passport, and important documents. Change your passwords and assume your computer use is monitored at home. Have the attorney file for divorce. Have her served. This is not a discussion and her permission is not required.	/r/Divorce_Men	30/10/17 09:56 PM