TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YourFavouriteGuy Archive

View 3 posts and 569 comments by YourFavouriteGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

It's to do with money Men are still often the main breadwinner and pay most of the bills. Therefore women should do most of the housework.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 07:22 AM
1

Okay, now the Church will analyse this for "2000 years"😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/21 07:14 AM
7

No, it's nothing to do with "never taught." We just expect to not to contribute to housework or contribute as much when we're the sole/main breadwinners.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:44 AM
0

Okay, now the Church will analyse this for "2000 years"😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 10:05 AM
1

Okay, now the Church will analyse this for "2000 years"😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 09:54 AM
1

Okay, now the Church will analyse this for "2000 years"😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 09:49 AM
1

Okay, now the Church will analyse this for "2000 years" 😆😆😆20 IQ
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 09:47 AM
1

Lol, lol-tothecatmobile 4:20 Look, you're writing the Bible, just like the Church HAHAHAHAHA IMAGINE BEING THAT STUPID
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 09:42 AM
1

Lol-tothecatmobile 4:20
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 09:33 AM
1

You drop the new verses with Francis? I heard it's gonna be crazy🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 08:53 AM
1

keep giving me amusement child😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 06:27 AM
1

JFL@girls who think God=boat, keep giving me amusement child😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/21 01:50 AM
1

Insane collab tbh, you've been analysing the Bible with the Church for 2000 years? And they told you how they wrote it too?😂😂😂😂😂Honestly girl, you're the joke that keeps on giving
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 12:07 PM
1

Let me know when the Church<sup>TM</sup> x tothecatmobile Testament comes out.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 12:03 PM
1

You and the Church vs The Bible Who wins?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Imagine thinking the Church wrote the Bible or analysed it for 2000 years HAHAHAHAHA sit down child😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 11:59 AM
1

Coming from someone who's height of wit is calling someone a child, and repeating back what's been said to them and what they've said, and complaining of others doing the same. I'm not bored though, you actually think that "God is genderless" and "the Catholic church considers god masculine" are contradicting statements?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Or that your statement disproves that the Catholic Church considers God masculine😂😂😂😂😂😂 LMAO
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 11:56 AM
-1

I'm not paying for holes either tbh
/r/MGTOW210/07/21 11:54 AM
-5

Who the fuck pays for cuddles? Just "cuddle" the girls you fuck Not that difficult
/r/MGTOW210/07/21 09:13 AM
1

I really hope you aren't Christian, girlie. Or that you're actually mentally deficient, it would be really sad otherwise. I've truly never seen someone so stupid as to ignore getting BTFO'd this hard and go "waahhhh bad English"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 01:15 AM
1

Wait, do you actually think that "God is genderless" and "the Catholic church considers god masculine" are contradicting statements?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Or that your statement disproves that the Catholic Church considers God masculine😂😂😂😂😂😂 OH THIS IS TOO FUCKING GOOD HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 12:40 AM
1

Who cares what the you think😂 "God is referred to as masculine in Catholic teaching and practice" "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) differs from most churches in that they believe that the Father, the Son and the Spirit are separate and male as well as masculine."
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 12:17 AM
1

And objects=/=individuals, especially God. The gender of nouns means nothing 😂 Just another reminder; "God is referred to as masculine in Catholic teaching and practice" "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) differs from most churches in that they believe that the Father, the Son and the Spirit are separate and male as well as masculine." This is too good😆😆😆😆
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 09:29 PM
1

"God is referred to as masculine in Catholic teaching and practice" "God is masculine or male" You must have skipped over the part about not bearing false witness right? Oh wait I forgot, you think that you and the Church know more about the Bible🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 No, bark more for me girl, this is actually amusing.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 09:22 PM
1

Yes, they do "God is referred to as masculine in Catholic teaching and practice" You must have skipped over the part about not bearing false witness right? Oh wait I forgot, you think that the current Church wrote the Bible or even that A church did HAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAH fucking LMAO
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 09:10 PM
1

And you think you know more than the Church who has spent 2000 years writing it, putting it together, translating it, analysing it, and studying it, who say God is masculine or male. What do those losers know right? It's not like their claims are backed up by the actual book. 😂
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 08:59 PM
1

I'm not the one who claimed to know more about the Bible than the Bible🤷🏻‍♂️ I know I know less than it does.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 08:49 PM
0

Well that's YOUR made-up definition. Maybe if you say inner beauty, I guess? But even then some decent woman must exist. Otherwise, no, tons of attractive women exist.
/r/MGTOW209/07/21 08:46 PM
1

I wonder which contains more knowledge about Christianity, you or the Bible? I think I'd have to give it to the ol'Bible.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 08:38 PM
1

Started your cult yet?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 08:08 PM
1

Is there an echo in here?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 11:57 AM
1

Amazing😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 11:42 AM
1

Nice pretending you haven't copied me this whole time lol
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 11:34 AM
1

I completely forgot who you were for a moment there. And then I remembered you are the little girl who said the Church knew more about the Bible than the Bible. Lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 11:03 AM
1

Wait, you think I should start a NEW religion, that is, based on the Bible? I wonder what that would be called? Oh, you fucking brainlet, you've done it again. You can't even be trolling, no troll is this bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 10:37 AM
1

>should exist during divorces No, it shouldn't, unless the man specifically asks not to have custody. >but not if the man wants an abortion and the women doesn’t. That's called a financial abortion, and women can still give up kids after they are born. Without the fathers consent, of course. I personally believe both father and mother should only be allowed to financially or physically abort prior to 6 weeks. If the father does not make a decision, it should be assumed he's opted out.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:09 AM
1

Date based on actions, not solely on views expressed I can say "a man should be honest" then go out and commit fraud, does this mean I have integrity?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:12 PM
0

Well no, because I speak Italian, so I knew immediately your comment was wrong. Try another one.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:03 AM
6

https://www.thecollegefix.com/92-percent-of-sex-specific-scholarships-are-reserved-for-women-study-finds/ Most sex specific scholarships are for women only https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-06-22/boys-bear-the-brunt-of-school-discipline Boys get disciplined more for the same behaviour https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/28/the-serious-reason-boys-do-worse-than-girls/ Some data analysis examining why boys, on average, do worse at school. Again, this doesn't stop men from g…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:46 AM
0

No, the title is part of the video's message
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:06 AM
1

video film Also, incorrect. In Italian, Il Padrino (Godfather is capitalised remember) means a mob boss.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:45 PM
1

A title is part of a videos' message. The context does not matter, a woman can mean any woman.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:17 PM
0

>21:13 >"Never make a woman priority over anything in your life" >66 Upvotes >watch the video No, I don't think I will
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:10 PM
1

Okay, sure the video talks about women that aren't related to you? Then still bullshit, because if you find your unicorn then why not prioritise her?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:04 PM
1

>break up Do you "break up" with your mother? No. You only gave an example for one woman, you have to prove it for ANY woman.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:02 PM
3

Don't go on what something usually is. Just look at what it says. We are merely given a title reminding us we don't owe women anything. I mean look at these comments: https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/oejb4b/he_needed_to_put_a_lil_bit_more_effort/h48hxhw/?context=3 People call men fragile for blocking women that don't want relationships with them and that they no longer want relationships with.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:01 PM
1

Fucking doesn't matter, title says "a woman," you admit a mother is a "woman"
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:55 PM
0

I do. The context is that I'm in r/MensRights, and there's a post about not making a woman a priority, which is stupid in multiple ways
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:53 PM
0

Wait, you can't prove it? What's that? You tried many times but like a petulant child, you failed? Church Vs Bible I wonder which (not who, the Church is not an individual🤣🤣🤣🤣legit sub 20 IQ moment) knows more about God and, wait for it, the Bible. I wonder🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 12:04 PM
1

Wait, you can't? What's that? You tried many times but like a petulant child, you failed? Also, still recycling the same jokes? Ironic, the walking circus can't come up with new comedy, what a thought😂😂😂😂 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 11:56 AM
7

>More right to cheat rather than more reluctance? We don't say "more right," we say "more correct" or "more morally right" >But you said female faithfulness is important I said that to mean male unfaithfulness is less morally wrong (i.e. more morally right than female unfaithfulness). >Not true, before child support the man would just leave Only if he found out. On the contrary, men find out more today, not less. Also, in some cases, men just don't find out. This happens a non zero percent of th…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:54 AM
-4

No. I have to get past the title to watch the video. If the title contradicts the video, then it's clickbait.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:39 AM
0

Awww, the little girl can't prove something so supposedly easy? Maybe she couldn't read the last comment Prove I know less than the Church, especially on this topic, by using the Church's own reasoning (quotes from the Bible, which they know more than me about) Wait, you can't? What's that? You tried many times but like a petulant child, you failed? Jesus would laugh at a walking, talking joke like you. Seriously, you have the brain of a child, just throwing back the same insults.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 11:38 AM
-3

No, explain why I should "never make a woman priority over anything in your life" bitch. Do it.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:37 AM
3

>Not going by your own logic, I didn't say reluctance, I said "right" >Well stats show that men cheat slightly more They don't. The difference is not statistically significant, and women would be less willing to report their cheating considering it is, rightfully, more taboo for women to cheat. >because it may involve rearing a child No, both men and women see women (or used to see women) cheating as worse, since historically it meant the man was forced to raise a child that is not his. The oppo…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:30 AM
1

Okay, then prove I know less, especially on this topic, by using the Church's own reasoning (quotes from the Bible, which they know more than me about) Wait, you can't? What's that? You tried many times but like a petulant child, you failed? I'd ask you not to worry, but you are a living, breathing, joke. Maybe reincarnation is real though, you'll do better as a dog, you'll be smarter and more useful.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 11:19 AM
7

>will primarily do so if something is wrong And then so will men. It's just that by the theory it's more acceptable for men to do it >opportunistic Women cheat just as much, even though they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:13 AM
1

Why don't we hear what the church has to say on God's gender Why don't we, sure: "God is referred to as masculine in Catholic teaching and practice" "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) differs from most churches in that they believe that the Father, the Son and the Spirit are separate and male as well as masculine." haha Awwwww, the petulant little girl can't respond to the argument or make her, so she fake laughs?😂😂😂😂😂 how cute🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Do you really think the Church o…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 11:09 AM
-13

What about your mother? Stupid title, fuck off
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:52 AM
1

So you do think the Churches don't say God is male or masculine. You also think the Bible is dictated by the Church and not the other way around? You also think the Church can't be influenced? Yes, I know more about the Bible than the Church, now use their arguments about the Bible, now use their so-called knowledge of the Bible to win purely using Biblical text. Wait, you can't? What's that? You tried many times but like a petulant child, you failed? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH😂😂😂😂😂😂😂STUPID LITTLE…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 10:49 AM
1

This church; "God transcends the human distinction between the sexes. He is neither man nor woman: He is God." Yes, the same Church in which "God is referred to as masculine" Or these churches; Imagine believing Protestant nonsense. Another major church though: "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) differs from most churches in that they believe that the Father, the Son and the Spirit are separate and male as well as masculine." Again I ask: Do you really think the Church…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 10:25 AM
1

Do you really think the Church overrules the Bible and God?😂😂😂😂 Make arguments through your own authority, little girl. Use the Church's reasoning for all I care, but even they say God is masculine.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 09:58 AM
1

The early "Church" was not a Church, they were a collection of religious authors, much of the Bible is transcription of spoken word😂😂😂😂😂And those people aren't related to the current Church Even your major Church still refers to God as masculine Do you think those people even overrule the Bible though?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Aaahh, you're too stupid, this is hilarious
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 08:46 AM
21

Nobody owes anybody anything unless a debt is willingly and knowingly accrued ​ That's why alimony should be abolished and child support only required when men willingly relinquish their parental rights
/r/MensRights06/07/21 08:29 AM
43

>aren't wrong by any means or unfair to men. Yeah, then the crosspost saying the opposite isn't wrong or by any means unfair to women
/r/MensRights06/07/21 08:25 AM
27

Actually the hypothesis is the opposite Female faithfulness is more important, evolutionarily speaking, because no matter how much a man cheats, a kid that pops out of a woman is always hers. The opposite is not true though, therefore women should show more exclusivity.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 08:22 AM
1

Imagine thinking you know more about the Bible than the people who rote the Bible God is male, this is established Christian theology, regardless of how much you hate the idea or how much you say the Bible doesn't determine Christian beliefs🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're legit so lost you can't come up with an argument, so you recycle "muh Church" that still sees God as masculine. Not to mention the Church is from the Bible, not vice versa, which I've already said, but you can't read can you, little girl?😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 08:19 AM
26

Based and potatopilled So can you get rich off potato farming? Are you doing GM or actively avoiding it? You thinking of making potatoes for the potato chip/crisp/fry companies?
/r/MGTOW206/07/21 08:10 AM
1

Just tell them you want a good looking, sensible, virgin that supports traditional gender roles and hasn't ever posted anything slutty online. When (or, should I say, "If") they find you one, then you can overlook MGTOW
/r/MGTOW206/07/21 08:07 AM
7

>Tbh the virgin was is a little too high of a standard because girls don’t have it for guys Because girls don't want it in guys. Also because not being a virgin doesn't necessarily lead to higher divorce rates/ short lasting marriages in men, but in women it does.
/r/MGTOW206/07/21 08:04 AM
1

Sofia? Lol We're talking settled Christian scripture, 2000 years old I think you need to find yourself a new brain, your current one isn't working too well. You lack an argument😂😂😂😂😂😂 Even the Catholic Church refers to God as masculine🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣your own shitty proofs contradict you
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 07:57 AM
1

"4 separate things" "third of the trinity" This was basic Monday kindergarten math stuff😂😂😂😂😂 Jesus, God the son, Holy Wisdom My god, you are stupid. The trinity is God the Father, God the Son (who is Jesus, God's Holy Wisdom, why say both dumbass?), and the Holy Spirit. They are one in essence but are three distinct persons. Basic stuff. Also noticed you used Sofia, which is the Greek, and not Hebrew, word for normal, not divine, wisdom. You're using the shittiest feminist arguments possible🤣🤣🤣…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 04:42 AM
0

The female personification of Wisdom is part of Jesus That's not a Trinity, much less a Holy one. Can you even count? Funny thing is, that's an entirely new book of the Bible, referring to God's actual wisdom unlike the previous two sections you've showed me. And God's wisdom, funnily enough, isn't female here. ​ I also love how you tried to capitalise wisdom but not Bible or the Son. You can't make this shit up, even stupid hillbilly children don't make such mistakes😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/21 12:01 AM
1

The Son is the image of the invisible god, So, an "image" of God is God? Wait, it says that God created the Son (as the Father) in his image!!!! Mind:blown😱😱😱😱😱😱😨😨😨😳😳 That whole trinity thing. Ah yes, the "trinity thing", which not only doesn't show the Son is part of the Father. Okay dumb child, I'll humour you again. Sure, the Trinity says the Son is part of God. Is wisdom in such a Trinity? No? Awww, too bad, your shitty argument fell apart again, little girl🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 04:41 PM
0

something Tfw things can actually have gender. Or maybe, I wonder, stupid little child you think God is a thing? Hmmm you seem pretty stupid even for a child. I'll make it more explicit for you. This is worldly wisdom being talked about, throughout the whole passage, not God's wisdom. Wisdom itself can't be male or female or have gender, and on top of that, God's wisdom is not being talked about. It may be the wisdom created by God but not His own wisdom say "he" doesn't mean its male? Ignorant …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 03:45 PM
1

Sure sure It totally didn't say Amen to begin with
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 03:39 PM
1

So who else's wisdom would the bible be talking about? Just wisdom in general, lol, nice try ... I like the little "..." you put to signify the passing of 6+ chapters, good job trying to be disingenuous God's wisdom is a her. Sadly, even when you try to misrepresent the words by having such a large leap, it doesn't make a difference. You can see it is not God's wisdom being spoken of, but worldly wisdom. If God's wisdom was created then, how did He think to create it and the world. My god, you r…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 03:30 PM
1

Wisdom God's holy wisdom. Funny, nowhere in the passage does it refer to God's wisdom. Even if it was God's wisdom, would not the wisdom be female, and not the God? What a simple little child you are😂😂😂😂😂 In the same chapter, the Lord (not Lady, or in the original version of the Bible, the female version) is used. I wonder why. Maybe the individual being referred to is male, regardless of his wisdom. Awww, is this all too hard for you to understand, little girl?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 02:51 PM
20

It is harming your current partner, you are lying to them Body counts always affects your current partner if you are a woman, because it is linked to shorter marriages and higher divorce rates. Men don't want to take that kind of risk.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/07/21 01:57 PM
1

Oh, what a surprise, a word for the same thing can have nouns of both genders, I totally didn't know that about languages! However there is no place where God Himself is personified as a woman. There are many places He is referred to as a man and masculine though. Obviously a mistake in the Bible right?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 01:51 PM
1

So now you're saying that nouns in Hebrew, when feminine, refer to females only? And that that overrules the pronouns for Him, which are male? Not even awkward, it's just sad you're such a stupid little girl😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 09:24 AM
1

The Catholic Church are the ones who approved 😂😂😂Imagine being dumb enough to think the original Bible had anything to do with Churches which part of the Bible am I saying is wrong Every part that uses male pronouns to refer to God, every part where he is the Father. In essence, much of the Bible. with no gender Imagine thinking referring to a specific individual with he or she conveys as much information as a general statement about an object or an unknown person. You sweet summer child, you ex…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 06:27 AM
8

A traditional man would employ other men to do so. Like men for the longest time, since even the most ancient of civilisations have. Sure some men make their own houses but many traditional men indirectly build their houses by paying for them. Nice try though bucko. Okay I'll ask you back one. Should a traditional woman make her own fire (no oven allowed) every night and yet still cook good food? Should she gather that food as well? Oh wait no because you can buy all that stuff, dumbass.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:20 AM
9

No, the fuck? She should be trying to actively avoid the attentions of other men, if she wants exclusivity like a good traditional woman Meanwhile as long as I'm not tryharding to fucking stand on the beach all day in speedos I'm not going to attract nearly as much women in a day as she will men in a few minutes. Big difference. Although yeah both people should be exclusive.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:17 AM
3

Ah yes the traditional woman so concerned with her husband advertising to other women Oh wait...
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:13 AM
1

Lol You're really pretending you didn't say the Bible is wrong and the Catholic Church is right Can you even read what YOU'RE typing? This is too good🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 06:12 AM
1

Legit nobody said that Nobody wants a traditional woman but also wants her to work And she's not a gold digger unless she's marrying for purely the money (in which case she would divorce the man, not very traditional) Fucking pure idiocy coming from r/TwoXChromosomes as usual
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:09 AM
1

So are you going to be the one to tell most Christians they're wrong? And tell them the Bible on which their religion is based is wrong? You amuse me too much🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 03:44 AM
0

No, it really wasn't, Amen was always used nice try troll
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/21 01:28 AM
1

You're not that guy pal, you haven't got the stats😂😂😂😂😂 that's because most Chistians think God is a male, keep crying
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 11:33 AM
1

Why don't YOU stop pretending most Christians agree with you, stupid little child?😂😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 11:22 AM
1

Hebrew is a language that had masculine and feminine nouns that are used depending on the subject. No, many language that uses gendered nouns doesn't use it depending on the gender of the subject, especially if the subject is a Spirit. The bible specifically uses the feminine nouns of some words to describe God, and not the masculine equivalent. Just repeating a shitty argument what a joke🤣🤣🤣Really, stupid child, even in the Hebrew they use masculine pronouns to refer to the Spirit, sit down lit…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 10:50 AM
1

And in Hebrew a noun being feminine in gender doesn't make the noun be a male or female😂😂😂😂😂 You're a fucking joke little child🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 10:20 AM
1

Did you forget again that even the Hebrew versions say what I'm saying?😂😂😂 HAHAHAHA just fucking LOL, you really used the CHURCH over the Bible what a stupid little bitch you are🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 09:29 AM
1

HAHAHAHAHA Imagine thinking the Church overrules the Bible and Christianity AHAHAHAAAHA FUCKING LOL AT LITTLE GIRLS LIKE YOU
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 09:27 AM
1

I trust the church Then you are an idiot, for the Church comes from the Bible, not the other way round. Even back in the very early days of the church, the terms "father" and "son" were explicitly stated to be metaphorical, and not a statement of gender. No, the church doesn't matter, the Bible uses father because God is a masculine parent. And you're taking a very english-centric view of this. Forgetting that the Bible was written in Hebrew, that is very different language. Yes, and even in Heb…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 09:05 AM
1

God didn't write the English translations of the Bible. Good try dumbass, the Bible doesn't have to be written by God to be His word. Pretty much all Christian groups and philosophers consider God to be masculine in gender. To quote the Catholic Church is to quote stupidity. The Bible supersedes the Church in any matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 07:56 AM
1

They refer to anyone committing the crime. Regardless of gender Exactly, they are not referring to a woman or even a specific person It is being used in the same way we might use 'they' today, to refer to person whos gender is unknown Yes, and God's divine gender is known by God, that's why He has conveyed he is the Father and he is a he. When "he" is used to refer to a specific person it refers to a man.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 04:25 AM
1

So do you think these laws "refer to a specific individual who is a woman."? Just lol @ your sub 80 IQ
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 01:41 AM
9

>random men are misogynists. She is, what are you talking about. She says "online misogynists really need is kindness and understanding to help them because "they need it the most."" Okay so either she's strawmanning here (hardly anyone actually says this) or she's just saying any guy who's depressed is an online misogynist? It's one of the two, nobody gives a fuck about online misogynists or even the mental health of men in general.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:11 AM
0

Still pretty bad trolling ngl Honestly nobody can be this stupid. You've either read "Amen" as "men" (twice) or you've failed to read some other part of the comment or you've not understood it. All of these require lacking an IQ above 80 which is unlikely or just being a troll.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 01:09 AM
1

>In legal writing, masculine language has traditionally been used to refer to people regardless of their gender Yeah, so you're stupid. That's Again used like your earlier examples. Like, a law could say "If any man has kept unregistered weaponry, he shall be charged." It's not referring to individual females with "he," get your head straight.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 12:53 AM
1

>Laws that say "he" for example, do not only apply to men. Okay, show me where the law used he to refer to a specific individual who is a woman. >You were unmindful of the Rock that bore you; you forgot the God who gave you birth. No, where is "she" here? The divine male can give birth, it's God, He can do anything. Ever heard of omnipotence, dumbass. >Isaiah 49:15, Isaiah 66:13, Psalm 131:2, Luke 15:8-10 NONE of those verses refer to God as the mother, I know that for sure, otherwise you'd've a…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 05:50 PM
11

Ah yes, because men are known for desiring emotional rather than sexual attention most often. Oh wait no wrong gender. Also, it's not irl, it's clearly "online misogynists" and I don't even know why she's helping them. She says it's not her responsibility to help men, especially since the men who ask her for help are apparently giving her "condescension, abuse, and rape threats." She's not actually wrong, it's nobody's legal responsibility to "help" others, The issue comes in here >I've seen so,…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 05:46 PM
1

>So “ha-adam“ is translated usually as “the man” (referring to either an unspecified man or to mankind as a whole, depending on context), whereas adam (without ha) is translated as “Adam” (referring to the specific man by the name). So all the way through Genesis 1–3 we have ha-adam and our English Bibles usually translate it as “man” or “the man.” Yes, because men were all of mankind, not because men were not male then. You make no sense. You said that calling Adam as all of mankind makes his g…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 05:21 PM
1

You used two definitions that don't make sense. God himself would not know his gender? No. In the examples your dictionary names, the specific person itself is not known, they are not talking of particular one being or entity. >Today a person can travel anywhere he likes. >he that hath ears to hear, let him hear Both of these are ambiguous. >The bible was translated into English a long time ago, language has changed a lot since then. And what has not changed is pronouns for males and females. Fo…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 05:02 PM
19

Nobody would agree with me, and you would probably attack me for doing so. Don't be disingenuous.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 04:50 PM
1

>Here's 4 quick sources on the "ha-adam" thing. First 4 google results. One of those is a scholarly article, I think the others are blogs Yes, and all say Adam was male, you are wasting time. >Many christians wrongly believe that the bible says that god is a man He is closer to a man than a woman. He is divinely a man, you could say. >I don't know if you're one of those christians who believes god is a man or something, but I'm sorry to tell you that that's not the case I'm not Christian. I don'…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 04:49 PM
18

What online misogynists need depends what they think misogyny is. If misogyny is merely lack of support of feminism or criticisms of women, then no, "misogynists" don't need any of that. ​ If they mean actual men who hate women, then those men need to have been born in a society which encourages mutual respect between the genders. Why? Because it's less likely that men will respect women if women don't respect men. Also, it would help if they were born in a decent household.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 04:04 PM
14

Ok yes, they did, now what. Should I go on a sub for cis people and make a whole post how I'm not responsible for trans people's mental health?
/r/MensRights03/07/21 03:59 PM
10

Yeah honestly don't mean to sound simpy in this sub, but yeah maybe she's just talking about career because she wants to know more about OP, you can't really assume she's doing it for gold digging. At least OP said he'll give her a chance.
/r/MGTOW203/07/21 03:57 PM
1

>ancient Hebrew translations they don't even use gendered language Uh huh, sure sure. Source? >The way it goes is that god created a genderless human, and then from that human created the distinction between sexes Wrong. Adam was already male, from his rib came a female. >don't use gendered language in reference to Adam and eve Yeah, source? >Although, many christians (wrongly) don't believe this is true of the bible, No, many Christians believe God is the Father (as said in the Bible) and that …
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 03:54 PM
1

No, it wasn't. It refers to males
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 03:45 PM
12

Emotional labour is a joke. Nobody pays you for emotional labour. ​ As for alimony, men spend far more money feeding, clothing, and housing their families than the amount of money women should be paid for their domestic work. Does this mean men should get alimony? NO, because the man chose to spend that money on the family, anf the woman chose to do unpaid work and the woman knew she was not being employed but merely helping the household. Therefore a man should be allowed to keep his assets and…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 02:54 PM
2

Obvious troll is obvious
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 02:09 PM
0

Churches can be liberal lol stfu
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 02:09 PM
2

God IS a man though, according to the Bible itself. Genesis {2:2} And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And He apparently created a man, from his own likeness too. According to Christian beliefs, God is a male.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 02:05 PM
9

Did you tell the husband? If not, you really aren't standing up "for your brother" either
/r/MGTOW203/07/21 10:33 AM
2

Alpha fucks, beta bucks. They use an alpha man for sex because they find him attractive, but yet when they get into a long term relationship they don't give those poor guys nearly the same amount of sex.
/r/MGTOW203/07/21 04:43 AM
7

I remember back during uni applications one dude from our school was briefing us on how if you were female, make sure to include that in your SEAS (special scheme to help "disadvantaged" people) because if you were going for direct entry medicine, for example, your rank would be pushed up for being female. I then said "clear sexism" out in front of the crowd, and then the dude replied "well males will get a selection rank boost if they're trying to become a nurse, so for all the fragile men who …
/r/MensRights03/07/21 01:01 AM
2

It's not about "can't handle" it's more about "we want feminine women"
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 12:49 AM
30

Massage knee? Why are people so mass gymnastic?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/21 12:48 AM
3

No relationship but ultimately it was my experience with women. I had sex with some decent amount of women through Tinder and a lot of these girls were in relationships or on the rebound. Just in general I've seen a pattern of what we call "AFBB" here. ​ Also, women are not traditional enough nowadays.
/r/MGTOW202/07/21 12:47 PM
1

>The thing is neither of these are bad when it's a two-way relationship >while she does nothing That's not two way, she would have to be willing to cook, clean, and take care of the kids.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:54 AM
2

>Both of these are bad but Only first is bad because of "she does nothing" Otherwise it's fair for a man to want a woman who isn't fat and can cook? What's wrong with that?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:13 AM
30

"toxic masculinity" is not applicable, he could hit a woman and get knocked out and that would still be okay. Either way Neanderthal mentality is nothing to do with toxic masculinity, it's just normal for men to protect themselves. Not toxic at all. ​ Actually no, scrap that, "toxic masculinity" is applicable nowhere, because masculinity can't be toxic. The fact that you even called masculinity toxic just shows you're a fucking loser. >Feminists don't want violence Feminists don't care when a ma…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:31 AM
119

What the fuck kind of math is this. It doesn't take a genius to figure that men have 1600 more strokes than women, you can clearly see that 30,200 is lower than 31,000 which is half of the 62,000. Honestly the lack of awareness is insane.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 03:33 AM
3

>dismisses other people's suffering We don't, and aren't doing that here >injustice and prejudice How is hoping for legal equality "injustice and prejudice"? Shut the fuck up, we hope for justice and fairness >I don't need to explain it No, you CAN'T explain it, because you're fucking wrong
/r/MensRights27/06/21 09:24 AM
1

>elementary school I'm sorry, is that primary school? So like Years 1-6 right? Depends on how young you're talking, but if you mean like on the younger side, that's not boys will be boys, that's kids will be kids, although the behaviour is still bad. >You don't sound very imaginative No, your family is pulling out the "boys will be boys card" too early. I was thinking you would say something like playing with a gun or trying to jump off a from a few stories up. I mean that's risky but still excu…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 03:29 AM
9

> "what did you expect to happen getting drunk at a fraternity?" "What did you expect to happen dressed like that?" This isn't explaining away bad behaviour, it's scolding someone for not being careful/taking precautions. If you left your front door open and were robbed, if I then said "what did he expect leaving his house open like that?" would I be excusing robbery? Anyway you shouldn't do it because after the fact, what precautions somebody took/didn't take is irrelevant, but still, implying …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:21 AM
1

>Or Trump's "locker room" talk about grabbing women by the pussy Was nothing to do with boys will be boys. His comment was true, if you are rich you they let you "grab em by the pussy." Anyone excusing that with "boys will be boys" is either saying that only a man could make such a statement or is just stupid. ​ And nobody uses it for justifying shitty behaviour, it doesn't work in a gynocentric society.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:15 AM
2

Bullshit. I haven't seen any other reaction to a guy pulling a girls hair than suspension from whatever school he goes to, as well as everyone thinking he's a misogynistic little devil. ​ Something stupid? Define it? Men tend towards risky behaviours, so boys doing something stupid could be boys being boys.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:12 AM
3

>victimhood circlejerk Ironic >contexts in which it's used Tell us, what context is the phrase commonly used in that you think is wrong
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:07 AM
3

They're less likely to disfigure themselves only because they choose less lethal methods. Men commit or attempt suicide usually when they are certain they have no hope or point in life, so they pick effective methods which will usually disfigure you.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:01 PM
4

The whole "women attempt 3x" more often is a myth that only works when you consider eating disorders suicide attempts. Women attempt more, but not by much, and choose less violent attempts because they have less conviction and less depression than the actually suicidal men. ​ The "mess" part is again horseshit, women just tend to kill themselves in less violent ways that happen to cause less mess. Also, why WOULD you care about the mess when you're gone, if your aim was suicide, wouldn't your fo…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 05:00 PM
-3

That's not true, your mother will love you for being born. What you could say is you might never find a wife that loves you simply for existing. Which is true, I guess.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:17 AM
1

Just flash your male privilege bro, everybody knows we live in a patriarchy
/r/MensRights25/06/21 08:23 AM
2

North Vietnam would have fared better if their female soldiers were male.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/21 08:54 AM
1

>traditional patriarchy men have more rights and freedoms, and they also have more responsibilities Yes, so Western culture was never a patriarchy >of traditional and progressive policies Traditional when it benefits women and/or harms men, progressive when it benefit women, yes.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 07:30 AM
1

Except it's not patriarchy. Patriarchy would imply men are legally superior to women. But no, men in the 50s didn't have the same rights as women, just like women didn't have the same rights that men did. All of this was while men had more legal responsibilities than women
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:27 AM
1

No, they shouldn't lower themselves, they shouldn't both have the expectation and intentionally work very hard to make money. You can't have your cake and eat it too. >And a doctor can reasonably expect to date other people like doctors No, they can't. If you want somebody to be as rich as you, don't intentionally work to have above average income. >A receptionist will earn less money and marry someone that earns less money Yes, sure, if both are actually looking for somebody who earns more. But…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/06/21 08:50 AM
2

Dangerously based. Don't let the people in this sub tell you otherwise, they just hate tradcons.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 08:29 AM
1

IS NOT A PRESSING NEED So? Who said it was? It's not a pressing need to find rich man either, women still do that. You make no sense, dumbass. likelihood Yeah, you proved that women get killed more often than they get hit by lightning. Also, this isn't counting sexual assault and rape and other things a man could protect a woman from. Good job, horse boy, now it's time to put you down for brain injuries Emotionally support their Pregnant Wives People who capitalise like this are unironically stu…
/r/MensRights21/06/21 01:24 AM
2

It doesn't. As for who's responsibility it is, it's a man's "fault" for actually looking, but looking is entirely morally okay if you're single. It's far more morally reprehensible to be dressing in a way you know will cause you to be seen in a sexual way, when that's exactly what you complain about. And anyways, even if you don't complain about it, it just shows your willingness to be sexualised by men who aren't your partner, and is immoral by any standard really. Women should be feminine, thi…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 07:11 AM
25

>“broke men” What? I'm just replying to the general standard of women >I didn’t read it as “they want rich men and they want to marry up!” Uh huh, then why did you keep up with the "if she’s a doctor and wants a richer man"? Why didn't you just stop me there? >It’s stupid asf headline The headline is stupid because men still make more money than women and most men aren't dead broke, so the only thing they could be implying is that "men aren't making significantly more than women anymore so there…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/21 06:01 AM
7

In today's society, yeah. Any expectations of men to be masculine don't hurt us when women are also expected to be feminine.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 05:45 AM
37

No, she should've not gone into a field requiring at least 5 years of study after high school and constant dedication, just to demand a man that makes significantly more. It would be excusable at least if she were a receptionist making 500k a year somehow; at least she's not intentionally making more than most men ever will, but if she's intentionally picking high paying careers, it's unreasonable to expect even richer men.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/21 05:37 AM
77

Lmao if you need a richer man, then don't tryhard to be a career woman. I mean, if I want a woman that had bigger ass than me, I wouldn't be getting ass implants would I? Shit makes no sense. On top of this, affirmative action exists, so the government and companies aren't exactly making it easy for us to make money.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/21 04:59 AM
5

Imagine having to use Google, a site that collects billions of results from the internet, to get an example of equal feminism. And then not getting any. >economic equality Lmao, they want equity too. >gender stereotyping Lmao, they don't want people to make fair generalisations of women when people make unfair generalisations of men. >men and women are equal in terms of their ability to reason, achieve goals, and prosper in both the work and home front. And they deny reality. Am I surprised? Of …
/r/MensRights20/06/21 02:43 AM
1

>Now you're putting words in my mouth, i said that Men's role as a "Protector" is largely irrelevant Which is the same, but anyway it's NOT irrelevant as men still provide protection for women, because we're stronger than them, >more likely to be hit by a lighting than be killed. Source for this bullshit claim? >Sorry, i need SOURCE for that unverified claim. . I always believed that Father's role started right from Pregnancy, by supporting the Pregnant Mother&all. I said raising, not giving mon…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 01:45 AM
1

>Irrelevant, they didn't even ask for it Irrelevant, that wasn't the point, you said they don't get protection, they do. Also, women often fear walking at night and many wish for some form of protection. >Which is why i said UNLESS you want to join those specific professions being a "Protector" is not NEEDED of most men No, it still is, or at least most men SHOULD be protectors. A man's wife certainly needs him to protect her, as he should >And boys that don't receive a father figure in early ye…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 02:14 PM
44

Somehow has 164 upvotes but 0 comments Nice
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/21 08:09 AM
-1

>is he less of a man He is less efficient and him and his partner collectively contribute to a less harmonious society. >just because I’m not attracted to women No, but I've read that homosexuals tend to have lower T levels on average. Still, you aren't less masculine if you merely like men. Again, it just contributes to a less harmonious community. >You see, that’s the problem with tradcons There is no problem, I am legally egalitarian but socially tradcon. >Just like feminists, they judge men …
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:27 AM
1

>Men's ability to "protect" is largely irrelevant. Massive cap. Women still get extra protection by having a man around as he can physically fight for her if she is assaulted. Men protect women, and anyway, the two professions you mentioned are naturally dominated by men. >Men can take care of children just as well as mothers. Completely untrue, women are required, and babies that do not receive a maternal figure in the early years have problems later in life. It also is good for immunity and pr…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:26 AM
-1

>Gender roles being loosened isn’t necessarily a bad thing It is, men are suited to protect and win bread, women to nurture children, this is the basis of a functional society, it works best. ​ Sure though, it's equal to either have strict gender roles for both genders or neither, not just one.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 11:50 AM
13

This is just the start ​ The breakdown of gender roles was always going to signal the breakdown of society
/r/MensRights16/06/21 09:03 AM
15

No she isn't, because he didn't make a general statement about women in the first place
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/21 08:59 AM
7

Anybody can have their success attributed to their looks, that's a fair comment to make. In this case, it is at least halfway true, many women become popular due to being good looking women. Even if it weren't, it isn't hateful to say it. Even if it were hateful, it might be immoral to say, but hey, free speech.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/21 08:44 AM
-1

I don't know why you're being downvoted. You're making sure that she knows you're referring to one woman and not all of them, and you even specifically said "that woman." Unless your comment said "women" before being edited, I don't get why people are so mad
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/21 08:40 AM
19

Ah yes, she's right about calling a man who called one woman entitled an "incel." Seamless logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/21 08:37 AM
3

Sexism is equality. Discrimination is fairness. At least nowadays. Such is life.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 03:26 AM
3

Yes, it's a pussypass too, and it is analogous to the dating scene. Women can offer sex for food/money and people will take that off, men can't do that. Women can also offer food and money for sex. ​ And attractive people having privileges isn't the point, my deformed child. My god, you're so stupid it hurts.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 05:27 AM
2

Hmm talk about empty skull, you literally made an argument as to why men give pussy passes but aren't self aware enough to see it. ​ Also, it's still not anything they do, because they aren't given a pass for having a pussy. Women are allowed to drink water because anyone can drink water, it's acceptable for everyone. Only the specific things women can do that men can't is a pussy pass, retard.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 05:27 AM
2

>If the man is raped by a woman and she faces no repercussions, that’s a pussypass ​ If a man is killed by a woman and she faces no repercussions, that’s a pussypass ​ >A guy willingly subscribing to only fans is not ​ One guy isn't, but the fact that female OF users can make a living out of their bodies through garnering enough subs while a male user isn't, is a mass pussy pass given by many men. It's okay, your comprehension isn't at that level yet, but next time you act like a child, do it pr…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 02:34 AM
0

Prostitution: the practice or occupation of engaging in sexual activity with someone for payment ​ It's an occupation, and food and weed isn't really payment, because that would imply currency was being given.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 02:28 AM
2

>By trying to argue about the semantics of what a pussy pass is, you completely miss the point of the discussion >Discussion: What is a pussy pass ​ It's not even a semantics argument, but even if it was, you'd still have room temp IQ.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 02:27 AM
2

No, everything a woman does and gets away with for being a woman is a pussy pass ​ You can't read? Ok lol
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/21 02:25 AM
-3

>Offering to suck dick for weed is absolutely prostitution though ​ No, it is not. She is not doing it as a job, she is not a prostitute, ergo it isn't prostitution. Are you implying what she is doing would be illegal in countries where prostitution is illegal? ​ >And if she's up front about what she's offering, I don't see how she's trying to get a pussy pass ​ I don't care about what she's trying, just the fact that women can easily get sex if they are a single parent on online dating asking f…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/21 04:49 PM
6

So? The pussy pass isn't the murder happening, it's the girl getting off. Even if a guy gets hit and doesn't hit back, that's apparently not a pussy pass since he's consenting to it and being an idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/21 04:27 PM
7

Plenty of men allow pussy passes to go ahead, what are you even talking about? If a woman commits murder and a male judge lets her off, is it not a pussy pass because he's doing it willfully? ​ Contrarily, the fact that the men do consent to it makes it a pussy pass.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/21 03:15 PM
5

>For me it would be a pussy pass if the woman demanded those things ​ No, the demanding itself isn't the issue. I'm sure there's one or two rare guys who expect money and "reward" women with sex. The main thing is that only women can actually demand it and have that demand fulfilled. ​ >As for being a single Dad, been there and done that. ​ K bro now go on Tinder and ask girls to pay for your dinner nd say you'll reward them with sex. Let's see how it goes. ​ >Not even sure when it comes to pros…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/21 03:08 PM
-3

She is, she's trying, and usually succeeding, to offer sex for money, and she is a single parent. Only women can do this in dating, not men. Even if she's not consciously using her pussy pass, she's receiving it. ​ And no, it's not technically prostitution. You can suck cock for weed though if you want.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/21 02:58 PM
0

>A woman offering to suck your dick and fuck you in exchange for for a meal and some weed ​ No, a man willing to take such a shit bargain (spending time and money on an average looking girl who has a kid just for her body?) is giving a pussy pass. It is, LITERALLY a pussy pass, the man would only give such a pass to get pussy. Go become a single dad and try that shit, see how far you get. But yeah ik the post you're talking about, the response was disproportionate. OP should have said no and wai…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/21 11:29 AM
6

"male toxicity" ​ lmao what a sexist bitch good luck bro
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:24 AM
1

>reality of childbirth and how the physical pain women have to endure in the process ​ So? once the child is 6 weeks, regardless of pain, unless the woman would be harmed by the pregnancy, nobody can take a life. ​ >especially when men get the control over your body ​ By that logic men control men's bodies too since we can't murder people, or if you don't believe abortion=murder, then stuff like drug laws etc. exist. Also, women voted those men into office, it doesn't matter if it's men or women…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:21 AM
1

Even in the comments, they seem to be calling "man up" and all that "toxic masculinity." Alas, they are sheep after all. ​ They even acknowledge in the comments that it's the expectations that are toxic but proceed to call masculinity "toxic." I'd like to see them start calling gender roles for women "toxic femininity." They lack functioning brains, most of them. ​ Also, the expectations aren't that toxic, gender roles are good, men should be disciplined with their emotions. The problem is proba…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:53 AM
1

Well, the main thing we discuss here is equality. I mean at the end of the day the treatments are accessible to both men and women, it's just that women get more funding. If doctor want to treat men and women differently, that's a societal (equity) issue, no equality issue. ​ Also, doctors not tying your tubes may be because they care about you more than men, not because they think you're childish. I mean women have lots of ways to ensure they don't have a baby and even if they do, lots of ways …
/r/MensRights11/06/21 02:39 PM
6

Yes, they are favoured, which is bullshit, but men are still better. I wonder when affirmative action will stop?
/r/MensRights09/06/21 03:39 AM
16

"has broken down in court" ​ Huh, no shit.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 03:34 AM
1

>Why cant masculinity be toxic ​ Because masculinity is strength, manliness. By itself, that can't be toxic. ​ >completely talking over them loudly ​ You seem to confuse being stupid and loud with masculinity. The two are not the same. ​ >are cars never dangerous or safe ​ They can be dangerous, for example, a car with a design flaw may cause bodily harm to the passenger, and thus be dangerous, because the car itself might cause harm (e.g. airbags are improperly calibrated causing concussion in …
/r/MensRights08/06/21 08:48 AM
1

Yes, but his masculinity isn't toxic. Him and his behavior are, it just happens to be that this man is a bad person and also masculine. His maleness itself isn't the problem, his actions/attitude are.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 08:47 AM
1

Well, that's caused by gender roles, and is broader. ​ But yeah sure, as long as you don't call masculinity toxic
/r/MensRights08/06/21 08:37 AM
1

>didn't invent it, nor do they own it. ​ They use it most, it supports their narrative now. We shouldn't use the term.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 08:36 AM
3

>Toxic masculinity isn't masculinity ​ Then end of story. Masculinity itself isn't toxic, you just agreed toxic masculinity isn't masculinity, so it's a bullshit term. Use "gender roles" instead.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 02:07 AM
1

>issues toxic mascultiny ​ I'm not talking about issues I'm talking about masculinity itself being possible toxic or not. ​ >"You're a man, you shouldnt cry" is a very real issue ​ Except to what extent is that an issue? Well first off that's gender roles/expectation and not toxic masculinity. But second that gender role should be enforced to some extent as men should not be too emotional. Yes when somebody dies, nobody should be disappointed in you for crying, but men SHOULD NOT cry for little …
/r/MensRights08/06/21 02:03 AM
2

Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, it doesn't matter. Masculinity itself can't be toxic. It can be used to be brash and loud or disciplined and calm.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:57 AM
1

>is a term therefore its real >all words accurately describe real things ​ Some words don't make sense, some words are used to describe something people think exist but doesn't, and some words are intentionally used to describe imaginary things. ​ >it doesn't mean physical masculine properties are toxic ​ Physical or mental, masculinity itself is not toxic, so toxic masculinity is a bullshit term.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:54 AM
37

But yet still you use the term. How can masculinity itself be toxic?
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:07 PM
168

Toxic masculinity is not real and is a shit term used by shitty people. ​ Don't further the feminist narrative. Masculinity itself is neither bad nor good, only masculine men can use it for bad or good.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:46 AM
2

Then misogyny is a justifiable response to misandry. Also, I'm not sure if she thinks misandry will work when the misogyny is coming from a woman.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 09:21 AM
4

Artificial wombs will exist before bone marrow babies are actually viable, and artificial eggs are being developed. Not to mention most of the scientists working on ALL of this stuff are, well, men. And most of the people providing electricity, water, gas, for the labs to run are, well, men. And most of the people who... ah fuck it you get the point.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 09:15 AM
1

When did I say that? ​ Also, isn't buzzword just a fashionable word? Saying something is a buzzword isn't saying that the thing it denotes doesn't exist. I was going to ask you if you were an idiot but I no longer need to, you've demonstrated that you are.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:07 AM
1

Well yes, because feminists are clearly worse, that is why I'm saying we don't use buzzwords, like feminists
/r/MensRights06/06/21 09:11 AM
0

Wait what? You meant being like a feminist is bad, right?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:44 AM
0

>How is it SJW to talk about class ​ Because there will always be poor and rich. The main thing is that people should get equality of opportunity and rights, not outcome. Unless you could prove more men are poor, and that's why more men are homeless, class isn't relevant here. ​ >Homeless men receive less funding because of children ​ No, they still disproportionately get less funding, don't pretend otherwise. Also, the fact that women in general are getting custody of children is also because o…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:38 AM
-4

>basic class analysis ​ Because she's not an SJW who talks about "class", she merely realises that homeless men receive less funding than women, and also that due to things like alimony and child support men can easily end up poor. That's still what we would call "internalised misandry" IF we were like feminists. We're not though, we just say men should have equal rights, buzzwords aren't our thing.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:27 AM
-2

Because it's wrong for women to have restricted roles, but okay for men to have restricted roles. ​ Not really though, that's just what some people think. In reality both men and women should have restricted gender roles.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:18 AM
72

Most electrical engineers, plumbers, and workers in essential services are men. If men die, everybody dies.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:01 AM
7

Well, you could say any male rights issues are "internalised misandry" since it's mostly men in government that have made decisions in a way that men now don't have the same rights as women. But it's not actually misandry, because those men don't hate men.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:10 AM
24

Hmmm tbh MGTOW sounds good right about now
/r/MensRights05/06/21 11:43 AM
1

Smooth brain moment. Women can use condoms and other female contraception too, this isn't news. Being able to legally use a condom does not give us the same reproductive rights or parental rights as women.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 05:28 AM
1

>I have been denied every request to get my tubes tied ​ Really? Legally, right? I mean if doctors are doing that to you legally, that's not a difference in rights as long as doctors are permitted to also refuse men who are "20something, unmarried, no kids", vasectomies.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 05:26 AM
2

No, I didn't say radical or not. Why are you a feminist at all, why do you believe women have less rights than men? Do you live in a third world country? ​ Also, no, feminism is supposed to be by itself, it is the "advocacy of women's rights on the basis of equality between the sexes." So, according to that, men have all the rights women have and more, and women need to have their rights made equal to men by increasing them. Nowhere does it say to advocate for men's rights. Unless you can show m…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 06:14 AM
1

Previous partners increase the risk of divorce, and make a girl unable to form meaningful connections. For me, even a girl who has been sexual/even allowed and invited men to see her in a sexual way is not worth a long term relationship. ​ Hard pass if it were me.
/r/askTRP03/06/21 01:30 AM
0

Why are you a feminist? Do you live in a third world country?
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:19 PM
1

That would make it worse. Currently, feminism IS the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds that that brings equality. So the premise for wanting women's rights is that it brings about equality (of course this assumes there are no rights women have that men don't, which is false, and that's the main issue) by increasing women's rights. If you JUST say "women's rights" then well now, they don't even have to pretend the reason is equality.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:04 PM
3

They get reported, and then the numbers of reports doesn't matter, because the posts attack men, not a "marginalised" group.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 09:45 PM
10

>Do these type of women think men are just stupid? ​ Is that rhetorical? Anyways, YES.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 09:43 PM
4

You didn't say cool though, you said unwarranted. If you go out and push some men in the back and then shout at them, you will expect to get put on your ass faster than you can say "sorry." You will KNOW that it is warranted when you do that.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/21 08:11 AM
8

It might be unacceptable, but that's up for debate. What's not up for debate is that if a man were to do what this woman did, he'd also get clocked, and so what happened in this scenario is equal treatment.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/21 07:12 AM
8

If, as a man, you were to tap men on the back and then start shouting in their face, you'd get knocked tf out ​ It may not be proportionate, but it is equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/21 07:09 AM
-6

Sure, it's assault, I agree. ​ Still though, most men self-respecting men would clock a guy if that guy were to tap them on the back and then start aggressively shouting in his face. You only think what he did was unwarranted because a female is antagonising him.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/21 07:07 AM
1

>apart from him getting caught by the person who's sister he abused a few moments ago ​ Do you have info we don't? Because OP said in title "falsely accused"
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/21 07:02 AM
9

I come on here and am constantly reminded of how lucky I am to have two brothers ​ Good luck with your sister man, hope you can get her to think rationally
/r/MensRights26/05/21 09:08 AM
1

I did not ​ You did, and you're fucking retarded if you think otherwise. You've used two different standards for "tall" even in the same sentence ​ It’s not ​ It is. If I say "men are wrong to hit women" then it's implied I'm talking about men who hit women. ​ it’s not mathematically incorrect ​ Their probability of finding such a man is less than 50%, they are mathematically wrong. ​ Then you clearly didn’t read it. ​ Oh sure, and you did right, even though you lack basic reading comprehension?…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 10:07 AM
2

Parental rights gap, parental responsibilities gap, sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 09:03 AM
8

It may not have that intention, but that is what it does ​ Yes, it is partly because of the empathy gap, however
/r/MensRights18/05/21 06:09 AM
1

Gynocentrism is female dominance. So yes, that's what OP was saying.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:10 AM
33

Custody and Alimony Sentencing bias Affirmative action
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:16 AM
3

You mean to ask why are men a threat to female dominance in society? ​ Gee, I wonder what the answer to that one is...
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:58 AM
2

She's retarded ​ We're the gender that keeps electricity, water, and gas working. We do the hard jobs that keep everybody alive and safe. She'd be screwed if men stopped working, let alone all died, one day.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:43 AM
0

Yes, they can write articles supporting the #IBelieveHer trend, saying you should believe victims.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 10:40 PM
1

Yes, you did, you linked us to the original meme ​ Are you okay?
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:33 PM
2

Mfw men aren't scared to walk alone even though we are victims of violent crime far more often ​ Honestly, why are women so scared to do normal things? Looks like the feminists have done a lot of fearmongering
/r/MGTOW13/05/21 11:01 AM
4

Nobody should be gushing about anybody else in relationships ​ Relationships are meant to be exclusive.
/r/MGTOW13/05/21 10:57 AM
4

Just like women have no obligation to give nice guys sexual attention, we have no obligation to give actually good, decent girls (which this girl isn't) friendly attention. ​ Also, a guy getting friendzoned by a girl actually hurts him, because that might've been a decent girl. If you get fuckzoned, then you shouldn't care, since you shouldn't like a guy who views ANY woman that way.
/r/MGTOW13/05/21 10:55 AM
1

So your point is shit, because even in the meme you posted, it is indicated that it is a satire, and is literally a meme, which is an actual joke.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 09:22 AM
1

I never switched back and forth ​ You did. ​ You cannot say “women” are mathematically wrong for having a height standard ​ I can, because it is implied I am speaking of the women who have said standard. ​ Actual study Here ​ Your "actual study" doesn't prove that there was ever the time only half of all men got to reproduce, because that's not even the point of the study. Nice try, I gave you time to research, but you still failed. ​ They can go for both ​ Reducing the population further, and u…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 09:16 AM
0

Well, no, they can still promote the whole "believe the victim" narrative. ​ They just can't do it themselves.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 09:07 AM
2

Apparently they she thinks she should be paid for doing household chores, but he shouldn't get paid back for spending money on her. ​ Just amazing consistency in the logic. I mean if it was both, I'd be okay. If it was neither, I'd be okay. But just the former?
/r/MGTOW13/05/21 09:06 AM
7

No, he does not have parental responsibilities, unless he gets access to parental rights ​ And he should be able to choose if he wants parental rights, since women can kill babies freely, but we can't even have a financial abortion, which doesn't directly harm the baby.
/r/MGTOW12/05/21 08:43 AM
3

Well, no, because the stove they use for cooking was invented and built by a man/ So are the things they use for cleaning. Also, men make most money, and contribute the most, economically speaking. And I'm pretty sure most men CAN do cooking/cleaning, but don't. This post seems to be some sort of bait to try and get men to "prove" themselves that they have the strength to do feminine things, but it's poor bait, as we can do much more than just that. ​ Typical Female Dickhead Strategy post
/r/MensRights12/05/21 08:21 AM
1

No, because if you're genuinely nice, you DO care about people's welfare. And so of course you will find it wrong for them to date "assholes." ​ Also, I didn't say I was nice. We're not talking about whether genuine nice guys should think or do something. We're talking about the morality of the woman's decisions.
/r/MGTOW12/05/21 05:46 AM
1

Stronger. ​ Having a weak immune system as a gender doesn't mean we aren't more physically capable.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:43 AM
0

Okay, my entire point was the #IBelieveHer thing on Twitter. I was going to say that so many journalists happily say they believe and that others should believe rape accusers.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:42 AM
-1

Because when feminists first did it, it wasn't a joke ​ Why here? Why not here? Humour is necessary to make light of the serious ​ Stop living with a stick up your ass, it's clearly not serious. Go taker your complaints to the feminists who AREN'T joking when they say this stuff.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:40 AM
1

You have switched back and forth, and the only closest you came a to constant value you gave was a man that is taller than 98% of females. This is NOT most men. This is less than 50% ​ why do more than 10% of men get sex? ​ You mean 40 something percent? Hell, I don't care if 100% of men get sex. We're talking about the standard, and people who hold that standard, being mathematically wrong, not how many women hold that standard, or if that standard is universal. The argument was always that wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 05:37 AM
1

Because men are physically stronger ​ Note that I would personally with men doing all the dangerous jobs if women were feminine and traditional, but they aren't, which is where the problems arise.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:19 AM
1

They have no problem with assuming the unproven when it's a man accused of rape...
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:16 AM
2

I may sound like a white knight here, but apparently he coerced some of them (i.e. said if they don't have sex, he will get them blacklisted) ​ I don't think casting couch is rape, because nobody's forcing you to do anything, but what I mentioned above, if true, is, morally speaking, definitely rape.
/r/MGTOW11/05/21 10:13 AM
2

>Is this who we are now? The bitter, angry ones? ​ No, but we do need a laugh once in a while. Notice how their intention when they do it is to unironically derail mother's day, but even in that meme, it is mentioned how "you women do the same shit on father's day." Clearly a joke, and a mockery of their shitty tactics.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 09:02 AM
2

Well, the fact is, it is always true for all guys, acting like a jerk will help you with women more. You will have more sex, which seems to be the main goal here. You don't want to be the guy marrying the pre-fucked woman, you want to be the guy who fucks her. ​ Acting nice has mixed results. If you're good looking enough, it will detract from your sex appeal, but you could still pull. If you're not so good looking, you will get no sex. ​ This is why "r/niceguys" exists. They are the latter grou…
/r/MGTOW11/05/21 08:58 AM
1

No, she should give the same treatment to all guys who act nice (i.e. she should consider all of them as good people, possible worthy of a relationship) . At least that's what a moral woman WOULD do. The problem comes in when you consider mainly that women will often give more attention to a guy who ghost/acts like a jerk to them rather than the nice guy, regardless of how attractive he is.
/r/MGTOW11/05/21 08:55 AM
1

"study" ​ Often, feminist "studies" do one of: prove nothing, have bad method, make wrong assumptions, are invalid, unreliable, misrepresent the population, etc.
/r/MGTOW11/05/21 08:42 AM
5

Nobody ​ Because they will give a non-answer, say the question is false, etc. ​ They truly think they are for equality. That's the main issue.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 08:39 AM
1

Well, yes, because all those accusations always seemed to come after both of them became of importance ​ Which is both suspicious, and also bad timing, because when somebody's important it's hard to ruin their life
/r/MensRights11/05/21 08:14 AM
3

Looks like you got the short end of the stick there bud...
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 09:10 AM
6

"University defends MRA professor who assaulted pro-choice students" ​ Imagine
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 09:07 AM
1

Yes I have ​ No, you have not, you've switched back and forth. Thus you lose. ​ The latter matters ​ So, 98%? ​ Not at all because a man not being considered tall doesn’t mean he’s completely cut off. ​ That's exactly what it means, don't deviate now. If a woman only dates tall men, then non-tall men are cut off. Another fail. ​ Not breeding with a large number of men isn’t cutting the population in half. You’re not killing them. They’re just not propagating their genes. ​ Another fail. If you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 06:06 AM
2

On top of this, they'll get affirmative action, which is quite literally discrimination, but is allowed when you help women.
/r/MGTOW06/05/21 02:49 AM
2

If a guy did it, he's no longer going to that job. Simple as that.
/r/MGTOW06/05/21 02:40 AM
1

If your criteria for life can't be applied across different contexts without being moral and just regardless, then it's not the correct criteria. It's not strawman, it's call using your own logic against you.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/21 02:36 AM
2

Jesus-freaks ​ Not Christian. ​ The alternatives to safe abortion ​ Are: not getting one. Just like the alternatives to murder. ​ abandonment, postpartum-induced infanticide, or dangerous abortion methods ​ Same with murder. If we make it legal, and have clinics to do it, then it won't be as dangerous for the killer, and the victim can be killed cleanly without any chance of disfigurement and crippling disability. ​ you to prefer the child be put in an oven ​ I prefer such women aborting before …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 02:07 PM
2

whatever shitty beliefs you hold on other people ​ Then you can't say murder should be illegal. Why are you forcing your shitty beliefs about the morality of killing on others? ​ medical procedure ​ I can kill someone in the name of medicine, doesn't mean it should be legal. Go fuck yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 02:00 PM
17

financial "abortion" ​ I put abortion in quotes because it doesn't directly kill the baby.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 10:41 AM
5

Yes, the man has to financially carry BOTH the baby and the mother. ​ Also, you're talking about something illegal, the law prohibits that, so that's nothing to do with equality. By law, a man has no choice in deciding whether he wants parental rights and/or responsibilities to the child. He can't financially abort, which isn't even equivalent to abortion, because the kid doesn't die from it. He won't get assumed 50/50 custody.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 10:40 AM
9

Because men don't have an incentive to help all men. They don't think about it by gender. There's no rich group of guys scheming "how can we oppress women boys?" ​ There's just human nature, and human nature makes us less sympathetic toward men.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 09:56 AM
3

So, the ability to sustain life outside of a certain place makes somebody a live human? ​ Seems arbitrary and specific, but sure. So, a person in a coma, not able to live without life support, is due to come out in about 9 months. Since that person can't sustain life outside of the womb, or even in a womb since they couldn't fit inside one, they are not a living human. So can the hospital autonomously decide to pull the plug and get sued for only property damage at most?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 09:54 AM
-8

>it’s better it be handled in a safe clinic than down a flight of stairs ​ So your argument is that abortions, if performed illegally, would be dangerous? ​ GOOD. IT SHOULDN'T BE EASY OR SAFE TO KILL CHILDREN. ​ >black mold is alive, hell genital warts are “life” ​ Black mold is not human cells, genital warts are genetically the cells of somebody who has them, so they can do whatever they want.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 09:50 AM
71

Men have no right to absolve themselves of the responsibility of a child, and also don't have the same parental rights, because court start with assuming the woman should get custody. Which is ironic, because then they make the man pay child support, which he shouldn't have to pay if the woman is a fit parent and can actually financially support a child.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 09:41 AM
1

Yes, separation contract. i.e. Bill Gates anal sex scene contract, because he's getting fucked in the ass either way. ​ The funny thing is, this woman won't even need a tenth of the wealth Bill gives her, nor does she deserve it.
/r/MGTOW05/05/21 05:58 AM
2

There is no prenup ​ lmao
/r/MGTOW04/05/21 10:53 AM
2

"Megahard House Extreme"
/r/MGTOW04/05/21 10:38 AM
18

Yes, like you? Stop lying, and get off this sub. You are half of our "hate" problems.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 10:21 AM
2

None of these standards are bad, in fact they are kind of low, lol
/r/MensRights03/05/21 10:15 AM
2

And affirmative action is awful behaviour, just in the opposite direction. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
/r/MGTOW03/05/21 10:13 AM
6

Lamborghini actually used to not make cars, they used to only make tractors. In fact, they only started making cars because Ferruccio Lamborghini had a feud with Enzo Ferrari.
/r/MGTOW03/05/21 09:22 AM
10

Honestly it's okay for her to be SAHM, if she's subservient, and honest, and loyal, etc. ​ >Why marry ​ Ah yes, the old ball and chain dilemma. Well, you marry to father kids that your wife can raise, I guess.
/r/MGTOW03/05/21 09:14 AM
3

I know it's grim, but it's the only way to win. That's how the feminists are getting it done.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 05:10 PM
2

Well, both men and women are becoming more morally decrepit, it seems.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 05:07 PM
3

Not really, a joke about someone being racist, isn't that bad. There's a clear punchline, yada yada. ​ But a joke about leaving him? Where's the joke? Just sounds like something you would only laugh at if you were forced to.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 05:04 PM
48

Toxic femininity at its best
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:57 PM
3

>I have not once attacked masculinity ​ Yes, you have, you said being stoic to a certain point is harmful. I said being emotionally manipulative to a certain point is harmful. ​ >Conversely you've argued multiple traits that are core feminine traits that are incredibly negative traits. ​ What, emotional manipulation and entitlement? No, not really, you should be always able to exert some manipulation, and you probably unconsciously do. And most people should feel and be entitled to certain thing…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:47 PM
1

Ah yes, the giving up, like leftists are famous for
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:42 PM
5

You seem very comfortable attacking masculinity for someone that is so defensive about femininity.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:08 PM
5

Do you have anything to back up anything you're said? That men don't report illness due to not wanting to be seen as feminine? Anything to back up the fact that you "don't think most women feel taking advantage of men is a core trait of femininity."? ​ No? Just some random notions? Really? Maybe that's why all these things are subjective. Yes, there is a side to femininity, being emotionally manipulative, feeling entitled to money, etc. that isn't so pleasant . This is okay in small amounts, but…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:01 PM
7

>You honestly don't think ​ You honestly don't think the "women are wonderful" effect doesn't exist? Really? ​ >'Feminists' can call whatever they want toxic masculinity ​ Yes, and that's how it will be defined, because it's subjective, and confining it to what you think means precisely dick ​ >That's why when men complain people say they are 'acting like a girl'. Or a 'pussy' ​ See? Exactly my point, gender expectations on men are much higher. Also, men complaining when someone calls them a "pu…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:54 PM
5

>And women often tie their looks to their worth ​ And so do men, so it's not a feminine thing. ​ >but hurting yourself to achieve a certain look is when it becomes toxic ​ That's poorly defined. A woman eating small meals isn't always hurting herself. Men often hurt themselves more at the gym than women do while starving themselves. Does this make going to the gym toxic masculinity? ​ >sense of 'masculinity' for that behaviour. ​ You're childish, then. Men make rape jokes because men are hornier…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:43 PM
1

Yes, your point that you can't win
/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:23 PM
7

No, it isn't at all gender neutral, because society sees most things as suitable for women, but not for men. If a woman either starves herself, or gorges on food, she will be supported and loved. If a woman is either a career focused woman, or a SAHM, she will be supported and loved. Women can't have aversion to doing something because of gender roles, because there barely are any for them. ​ So no, it's a bullshit definition, which doesn't even encompass the many things feminists call "toxic ma…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:22 PM
5

>Woman not eating a solid meal on a date ​ Women don't starve themselves because "muh gender roles," it's usually for looks. It's comparable to a man going to the gym, but just unhealthy. ​ >men not reporting an illness ​ IS due to gender roles, so you aren't applying "toxic gender roles" evenly. But your definition is still stupid. If a man makes rape jokes, it's toxic masculinity (at least according to feminists). None of these has to do with gender roles. That's not how it's defined. ​ Either…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 03:06 PM
1

I can't win ​ You're not wrong. ​ you still didn't even want to read some of them. ​ Well, most of the article isn't evidence. ​ people testifying ​ What does a testimony prove? That some guy who worked for Trump Institute is claiming they are doing fraud, that's all. It's not evidence. ​ consider valid proof then you must prove why it can't be valid proof ​ No, only a simpleton who doesn't know how logic works would assume that. Once you make a claim, you have to give evidence, tell why it is e…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:46 PM
1

there is evidence he worked at trump university. ​ And yet, that still doesn't make his words evidence, so you missed the point entirely. ​ All you've done is deny any claims ​ Burden of proof is on you to prove, not me to disprove, your claims. ​ don't provide any substance to your claims. ​ I'm not the one making the claims, are you too blind to see that? Are you even self-aware?
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:11 PM
1

Well, it could backfire. He could end up having to pay child support, and still not getting any parental rights, like usual.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 10:15 AM
1

Better luck next life
/r/MGTOW01/05/21 09:51 AM
5

Yes, women are less horny, and therefore have higher standards for attraction, yes we all knew this. This is why rape is only considered rape when it's man on woman. This is why men who have lots of sex are considered legends and women who do so are considered thots.
/r/MGTOW01/05/21 09:46 AM
0

Incels are merely frustrated men who hate women for not giving them sex. We don't see the same thing in women because unfortunately a lot of men will fuck anything that moves. The female version of incels are thots/whores but nowadays these women are supported wayyy too much, lmao.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:42 AM
4

Arrested? By whom? The few females cops that they have in the police? Even worse, when murderers know there are going to be less cops allowed to go out after 6, they will all decide to commit murders after 6, putting an even heavier load on the already short staffed police.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:33 AM
1

What? What's wrong with telling girls to smile? When I do it, they smile. What? I don't get it?
/r/MGTOW01/05/21 09:25 AM
4

Nah man, if we were going to keep the anti male laws, as a conservative, I say we'd then have to take back women's voting rights, etc. It has to be fair and balanced regardless.
/r/MGTOW01/05/21 09:14 AM
1

Ah yes, the one instance in one tribe in one corner of the world... ​ Who gives a fuck. Are they doing this in the countries where millions of women are being oppressed? No, because in reality, men have all the power, despite some random men in Papua New Guinea not being able to stop their wives from killing children.
/r/MGTOW01/05/21 09:07 AM
8

The second option. ​ Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex and Marital Stability | Institute for Family Studies (ifstudies.org) ​ Note how they focus about how there isn't an increasing risk every time you increase number of partners. But they ignore the fact that 0 partners gives the lowest risk of divorce. ​ She doesn't want "damaged goods" because she knows she will divorce a man who isn't some 6 figure rich guy. Men don't want actual damaged goods because we know inside …
/r/MGTOW01/05/21 08:39 AM
1

If you want to consider the articles conclusion when you asked for data, then you should be correct. ​ Unfortunately, you were still wrong. Even if the breadwinner expectation is not good, then it's women who have to stop holding that expectation. If it's good, then men always will make more than their wives. You're wrong either way, no matter how you or anybody else interprets the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 04:44 AM
2

If I just highlight the part of the article ​ No, because there is no part of the article with actual evidence. ​ he's lying because he's being paid ​ Yes, and you pulled the "testimonial" card out of your ass. How do the words of some random dude count as evidence?
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:40 AM
1

I don't agree that the strength of child & father bonds just comes down to values they teach ​ Values AND life lessons. If you still disagree, let's agree to disagree. ​ Where do you live where this is the case? ​ Wasn't one of the main points of this discussion that men don't get fair custody treatment? If men can't be with their children, how can they teach them about life?
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:08 AM
1

I think it's hilarious that women are the ones with the breadwinner expectation, and that you looked at the article's subjective opinion of the data rather than the data, but you still failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 10:55 AM
2

confessed ​ More like, "was paid" ​ I'm not able to chop it down ​ So you aren't able to show the part of the article with the proof? Sounds like you haven't read it thoroughly either ​ Why do you make him out to be such a Saint anyway? ​ To beat the DemocRATs.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 10:50 AM
2

Yes, and yet these are all biased claims. The first one doesn't proves he's directing the "fraud" (which probably didn't happen) being described in the second source. ​ An article with a link to a more in depth look. ​ Yeah, no, I'm not reading a long article. Your evidence should be succinct. Either give me a paragraph number or don't send such long articles. ​ Literally nothing you've posted proves that Trump directed any of the unproven "fraud" you claim happened.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 10:12 PM
1

And you provided no sources for your percentages. Why should I work for a higher standard? ​ You didn't ask, that's why. I don't have to provide evidence till you ask for it. Is there a male breadwinner norm? Don’t look at spouses’ income to find out, U-M study says | University of Michigan News (umich.edu). Most husbands make more than their wives. ​ Glad we can get on the same page. ​ Truly, yes, you are a shitty human with irrelevant opinions, even you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 10:10 PM
2

Well, purely sex value, no. Then, looks and weight are more important, for one night stands etc. ​ But for relationships, yes.
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 09:38 AM
1

natural and sexual selection are "blind" ​ That's the point of nature, it's not a conscious being. If I said this, you should see that what I mean is that some things are more beneficial and work better, at least according to nature. ​ "hey values donor!". ​ It's a weird term, but not wrong. If your teacher said hi, would you say back "hey learning facilitator" or "hi miss"? The first one is objectively true, but... ​ Sorry i dunno what capping is. ​ Lying ​ I'd assume most had a strong bond wit…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:36 AM
1

I stated you were wrong ​ Not really an assumption, more of a logical conclusion based on statistics. Again, notice how your "statement' doesn't actually mean anything without proof. You claimed you weren't married to a richer man for his money by saying you had a prenup. You provided no proof of this or whether the state you're in allows prenups to be struck down. ​ Whatever your gender, that quality makes you a shitty human being, and your opinions worthless. ​ Look, you're throwing a bitch fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 08:29 AM
2

Right and I guess all the people who stole shit and don't get caught ​ Even if they get caught, it would have to be proved they were doing it with the intention of not returning the goods. This isn't even the same, because being caught taking goods is actual evidence. You have no evidence of fraud. ​ settled on a 25 million dollar ​ That could've been to avoid bad publicity, knowing how many people hate Trump. ​ Doesn't make him less of a scammer ​ Neither less nor more, because I'm sure he does…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:21 AM
1

You could be the sole bread winner working one day a week ​ If you can support the family on one day of work, sure. ​ Division of labour ​ Yes, the labour should be divided like this: Men do work outside the house, and women work inside the house. ​ Nature intends nothing ​ Well, yes, it does. That's why men tend to be more physically capable of both fighting and work, and there are a higher amount of smart men than women. It is also why women are more caring and nurturing. ​ or a sperm & values…
/r/MensRights28/04/21 09:16 AM
1

Well this wasn't about women in general, and you refuted the very true point of most women marrying richer men, using anecdotal evidence no less.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:46 AM
2

just because he got away with scamming people out of their money doesn't mean he didn't scam ​ Add just because you keep assuming he scammed anybody doesn't make it true. Innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 08:37 AM
101

Funnily enough, it is because of capitalism. In capitalism, idiots lose.
/r/MGTOW27/04/21 11:49 AM
3

Sauce?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:37 AM
5

Mandatory? Fuck off, that can't be true? Is it? Surely men get to choose how it gets checked for, right?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:37 AM
3

Yes, but regardless, the health effects should warrant more funding. Identity, self-esteem, appearance? The first two are based on subjective things, and can be controlled by women just being mentally stronger. The third is also subjective, and not half as important as health. ​ The main thing to be considered when looking at funding for cancers is looking at the effect it has on general health. If you could point to something saying that breast cancer kills more often, or has higher prevalence,…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:35 AM
6

Maybe one day there will be gene therapy or it? Idk man sorry for your loss
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:27 AM
2

What? No fraud conviction was made, so you can't prove that's a scam. Just more baseless accusations. Did Trump even do or direct any of the "aggressive sales tactics" of said institute?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:05 AM
3

No, all feminist groups are like that, by definition.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:00 AM
1

I have a hunch it's not the right group for you
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:38 AM
5

No, I think it has more to do with the fact that feminist groups are more against equality than for it
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:37 AM
1

Just making the point that working isn't the bulletproof excuse for laziness at home ​ It truly is, if you're the sole breadwinner your wife should do all the work at home ​ fact that protection and provision are men's main roles in raising children ​ Yes, because they are, that's how nature intended it. ​ Not like they should just stand guard, send money, and occasionally play catch ​ Yes, this and teach their kids values etc, but yeah pretty much
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:28 AM
3

>The guy with a strong reputation for lying, being ignorant of most subjects, and defrauding clients. The guy who is no longer allowed to operate a charity due to fraud. ​ not one of these claims have any base at all.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:58 AM
10

American liberalism isn't classical liberalism. In America, liberal means some annoying feminist/identity politician who talks about how they use recycled cups for their coffee
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:57 AM
1

All the men i know do both ​ Okay ​ Also, not saying you do believe this, but it's a very weird and utilitarian view to have where men play no major role in the lives of their children other than contributing money. ​ Not no role, but yes the main role of men as parents is to provide and protect
/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:51 AM
1

You have similar issues, your mother was fairly stupid too
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 05:47 AM
1

SHEEESH🥶🥵
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 10:33 AM
2

Gold is not worthless, it is a rare earth metal. It has many applications outside jewellery, too, so it will never be worthless.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 10:29 AM
9

The discussion is quite funny actually. These women are so confused about why men don't want "independent women." ​ Why we don't want OnlyFans girls: Shows promiscuity, they are untrustworthy whores. ​ Why we don't want some office girl: Shows lack of willingness to be feminine, stay at home and raise children, etc.
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 10:26 AM
9

No, even AHS should stay, just that Reddit should no longer pander to them
/r/MensRights25/04/21 09:26 AM
28

What a fucking whore tbh
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 09:09 AM
1

Realistically, he said "nah fuck that" and then SHE went on a 45min rant online ​ lmao
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 09:05 AM
1

Prenups often don't work, and in some of the places they do, can easily be struck down if the judge deems it too harsh on the woman. ​ I'm not sorry you're so stupid, because I'm not the guy who came in your mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 08:56 AM
1

If I was planning on using my partner for his money ​ More than 50% of married women are dating men who make more than them, so you'd have to provide proof, otherwise I can only assume, like most women, you're dating a richer man. Also, you don't need to see someone's actual paycheck to figure out they have money. There are other indicators of net worth. Also, you'll get access to that money (alimony, child support) when you divorce him, so there's no question of access. ​ Not every woman is a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 04:42 AM
2

lesssgoo
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 02:15 AM
2

Oof that's just rough. Time Magazine woman of the year right?
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 01:56 AM
1

even if it's just a small minority, have a preference for average men? ​ Why all the mental gymnastics to change the subject from women in general to "a small minority."? Everybody knows women like masculine men, so when so many women post that they love dad bods, and none post about liking ripped men, it follows someone is lying. ​ Does it hurt that much to believe you have a chance? ​ And look who's talking about mental gymnastics. If that was an actual sport, you'd win gold every Olympics, ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 01:37 AM
1

No one works quite so hard to lie about who they're attracted to as most women who say they're attracted to average men
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 12:19 AM
0

No, we're convinced you lie because women will ride the cock carousel with many guys regardless of how shitty they are, and then date a dad bod guy, who you use for money and comfort. From there, you can easily divorce, get alimony, etc. ​ Yes, muscles may not make up for being an asshole, but being good looking enough overall will.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 11:11 AM
0

You know, there are plenty of women who happily spout that they find conventionally attractive men to be what they're looking for ​ Not really, it's not as common as women openly talking about this dad bod thing. ​ We say we're attracted to men who aren't runners or swimmers or lifters, dad bod men date us, we sleep with them and marry them, and spend the rest of our lives unhappy? Where is the benefit to women here? We say we're attracted to men who aren't runners or swimmers or lifters, dad bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 11:06 AM
1

Well, when an ideal has been talked about for so long but you never see a good example of it, it's hard to believe it exists
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 11:01 AM
2

The benefit: Less chance of cheating. Women prefer less masculine men for long term relationships. It is known
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 10:55 AM
3

I personally only have sex with women and nothing more. I clearly say on my OLD accounts "just looking for a good time" or something like that to make sure they know it's just sex then done. Not even FWB, I make sure to tell so as not to mislead anybody. ​ It's the closest to safe you can be from accusations. Unless you get married, which has more risks in that case.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 10:50 AM
8

Not to mention, betraying his country and bloodline by marrying a non royal, especially a foreigner. ​ He's one of the heroes of r/FDS, they think the actions of the most simp, female bootlicking man should dictate how the average men act. They happily ignore that he's not much of a man, though.
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 10:45 AM
1

Seriously, you're so predictable, I knew you wouldn't get that I was mimicking you to mock you, and I also knew you'd say I'm predictable. I guess that's what comes of being a predictable married man in his predictable married life, "having a wank" because his wife would rather suck my cock
/r/MensRights24/04/21 10:21 AM
0

Give me more! I love this geriatric butthurt attitude of yours. Please continue.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 07:18 AM
0

I can tell you want to get the last word in, but I type decently fast and have no problem replying. ​ It's worth it to know how much of a beta incel you are.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 06:41 AM
3

I read this long ago, it is obviously bullshit
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 06:35 AM
1

>Just like how avoiding the four As is smart ​ Are you hard of seeing?
/r/MensRights24/04/21 06:34 AM
5

>You can recognize that most abuse victims are women ​ Which would be wrong. ​ >patriarchal ideas that push men ​ If it's patriarchy, it would benefit men, so it's matriarchal.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 01:39 AM
14

It's because we're just better bro. ​ Literally better at winning bread
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 01:36 AM
6

How do men have power over women? Men can't legally control women in any way.
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 01:19 AM
1

lmao, all of that isn't worth half of what men do for stay at home wives. What a dumb whore
/r/MGTOW24/04/21 01:14 AM
2

Yeah, bro. Just like how avoiding the four As is smart: Alcohol, after midnight, attractive, alone. But if rape laws were nonexistent, we'd talk about fixing the law first. ​ Since financial rape ("alimony, custody, child support") laws banning it are nonexistent, and this sub is about, you know, "Men's Rights" we'll focus on that.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 01:05 AM
1

Speaking of smells, how does it feel to have a loud annoying child that you had to/have to smell the shit of everyday? ​ You'll die before me, don't worry, your wife will probably have left you by then. Make sure you give the neighbors a key, so they don't have to call in the smell. When they definitely, haven't seen that old guy for a while.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 01:03 AM
1

up saying men objectively have no child rearing skills so all they contribute is the money ​ I said mostly, so as in most of the contribution is the money. I'm not saying men couldn't learn, but yeah most men still go out and work rather than do domestic tasks.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 12:56 AM
2

I've met enough decrepit men ​ Like yourself? Look, just because you'd feel lonely without a wife, doesn't mean everybody will ​ old and undateable ​ That's better than old, undateable, and poor. ​ Also, don't old rich men get mad pussy? Seems like someone here is coping
/r/MensRights24/04/21 12:55 AM
1

So you're saying that after birth if you haven't decided to drop parental rights / responsibilities, you have to continue to raise them. What if you don't? What if you leave the household, avoid contact, and do your own thing elsewhere? ​ Then you pay child support, because you've done that yourself. Note that this makes sure you're still a fit parent, and can get 50/50 custody if you want. ​ The court takes away your parental rights and you no longer have to responsible for them? ​ Well, in a p…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 06:36 PM
1

And a wank to cool off. ​ You still wank huh? So, your wife isn't even worth her entire pussy to you, what a joke😂 Try again bro, you get half of a used pussy some of the time, I definitely fuck more women than you.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 06:34 PM
1

but you're not going to get anything other than pity from me. ​ Ironic ​ give your life purpose by hammering on this point ​ I'll give your wife purpose by hammering on her loins ​ Come off of it, nobody gives a fuck about one perfect marriage, you really think anecdotal evidence is valid. The fact is marriage has too little of a reward for the risk. All the stuff you described other than the child, which was the least appealing part, can be obtained without marriage.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:38 PM
4

Not really, it's supposed to be the government upholding people's rights. ​ Also, prenups don't work all the time.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:33 PM
5

I would say the average horse probably has a more compact midface than femcels tbh
/r/MGTOW23/04/21 05:32 PM
1

Not American, we spell those things differently, like wow is wauw. The more you learn, right? ​ Not above 80 IQ, you mean. Wow is a defined word with a defined spelling. wow: expressing astonishment or admiration. ​ maybe fuck my wife later. Because I can! Wonderful! ​ Maybe get divorced and sued for half your money, and lose all your children. Because she can! ​ Wonderful!
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:29 PM
-1

Aww, can't even spell "Ahw" the correct way anymore? Is the little baby triggered? ​ >Starting a business has risk ​ Starting a business has much more reward than marrying, since we're talking that way. The risk is worth is so you can get lots of money and have some influence.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:15 PM
1

No need for frustration, my friend. Simply do the opposite. ​ "womansplaining female tears wommanterrupting toxic femininity And especially: kill all women" ​ It's not so hard. It seems wrong, but remember the purpose is to make them see how stupid they sound.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:09 PM
1

"manly sized" ​ I'm already fucking ded ​ >approximately the size of Jupiter ​ more like the size of a quark
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:07 PM
7

Yeah, prostitution should be legal. I mean from a logical standpoint.
/r/MGTOW23/04/21 05:01 PM
-3

>Lots of people make it. ​ Less than 50%, apparently. So, most don't. ​ >But if you're a unlovable jerk. Maybe your way is best. ​ You're an unlovable jerk? Sorry to hear that, but I'm not surprised, a mental pygmy like you thinking getting a good marriage has to do with being "loveable."
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:00 PM
-3

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Sounds like you shouldn't have married in the first place. Which was the original point...
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:53 PM
3

Quite literally one of the stupidest, ill-conceived, poorly constructed headlines I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:50 PM
2

Female Dickhead Strategy, more like
/r/MGTOW23/04/21 04:47 PM
16

She's not though, she's just acting like that on Reddit. The worst kind of asshole is the one who pretends to be innocent. ​ No woman is seriously stupid enough to go on OLD and not expect horny men all the time.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:39 PM
3

Well, it could've shown him some stats about marriage in general, applying to both gays and straights. ​ You can't expect everyone to be as one sided and narrow minded as you.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:32 PM
2

Divorce? You mean getting financially raped? Yeah really good solution there
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:30 PM
0

>This isn't an issue of equity. For it to be an issue of equity there would have to be groups who require more thank you gifts than others ​ No, equity is not like that. Equity is everybody getting the same outcome, regardless of who needs what more. You could say OP requires more flowers because he didn't receive any. And the solution wouldn't be to give him more in total but just enough to make it equal. It's an equity issue. ​ >This is an issue of equality. ​ You're so wrong, I can't even beg…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:34 PM
1

Think of a classic example of the man who has lots of kids by multiple women and has no interest in raising them. ​ No, because once you choose to raise a child, you should have to, unless the parental rights for the child are taken away by court. I even think this for women, past a certain point they too should not be allowed to merely throw a child away. ​ consider more important things like the non-financial things a father brings to the child's well-being ​ If you ignore money, men objective…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:19 PM
1

>tfw you get put in jail for 20 years for saying you have a 6 inch dick when it's actually 6.001 inches.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 11:16 AM
1

Yes, equality issues are rights issues, not social equity issues. ​ I'm confused, did you not read my comment? Or yours? You said this was an equality issue, I was refuting that.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 11:14 AM
6

So, any deception causing people to consent would be lack of consent? So how about makeup? How would that work?
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:37 PM
0

>which can broadly come under "rights ​ No, it can't. Equality issues are rights issues. They're the same. When feminists campaign for equality, the only way to rebut that is to say "well women have more than legal equality." You literally cannot confuse the two, otherwise we'll be campaigning for men and women to be viewed as one and the same, which is never happening. ​ Although yeah I agree it's allowed, but it's not a rights issue. Forgot the sidebar.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 10:14 PM
1

shared by, coming from, or done by more than one. ​ So if more than one woman is that tall, it's not considered tall? ​ Are you that uneducated? Do you not understand there are multiple definitions for a word, which vary according to context? This would mean 99.999% of men are not tall, because the worlds two tallest women are massive. ​ Half of men are taller than the vast majority of women. ​ The vast majority is 98%, as you said, and then no, that's only the top 43% then, not most, dumbass. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 08:58 AM
1

It’s not different all my comments have been consistent ​ That's laughable, you haven't even been able to choose what is tall, you've lost this argument about 8 times ​ 3-4 inches is a significantly taller than a given women. However being taller than 98% of women is “tall”. ​ So which one matters? Both? Not really, because you said "to explain further a 5ft woman and a 5’4 man. He’s significantly taller than her but he isn’t “tall” because he’s still within the range of common female heights" S…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 08:45 AM
0

It may be a gender issue but it's not a right's issue
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:15 AM
2

Yeah tbh both masculinity and femininity are good when men and women are those, respectively, we shouldn't say that either masculinity or femininity can be bad. ​ At the same time, they aren't ever going to stop with that bullshit, so we need to turn the tables to make them see the problem.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:52 AM
8

Proof or bullshit tbh ​ If you are going to compare this to TwoX, please provide evidence of a post where a man expresses hate of women with more than 1k upvotes.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:48 AM
-2

Don't know how this is related to men's rights but yeah just ask for a gift
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:25 AM
1

3-4 inches or more ​ This is different from your other comment. Also, that's not a percentile, and also, then to be tall enough a man could be 5'7 lol. ​ I actually don’t because they’re both relevant ​ No, they're really not, pick one or you're stupid. ​ Amend it to be a significant amount of men are tall enough to be tall. ​ Ah yes, breaking news: 50% of a distribution is above the mean. What a shocking revelation! Also, I said "tall enough" as in to women, not to be tall. So nice job of avoid…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 09:21 AM
1

Either way more than a teeny minority ​ No, but still half of all men. That's mathematically wrong, because if you only reproduce with half of men, they'd each have to have four kids just to keep up population. Which is improbable. ​ If they’re taller than the average woman then they’re tall. We’re not arguing hon. >A man has to be taller than 98% of women to be tall. ​ It seems we're not arguing, but your split personalities are, hon. ​ Common doesn’t imply more than 50%. It implies not rare. N…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 09:09 AM
1

I get the my money my choice thing but if you're selfish it will be in direct conflict with what's best for the child in some cases ​ Unless you have parental right (i.e. you are a proper guardian of the child) you should not have parental responsibility to do what is best for the child. Only two entities would have that responsibility in that case: the mother and the government. ​ If financial success contributes to the evaluation of someone as an unfit parent ​ Ability to raise the child alrea…
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:52 AM
1

True, it's still not good to do. I guess just don't marry if you aren't completely sure you won't be able to get out ASAP if you want (hint: prenup)
/r/MGTOW20/04/21 10:47 AM
24

I suppose you shouldn't come home excessively drunk, especially if you have kids. ​ Your wife should also not have the temerity to shout at you if you aren't actually doing something violent/wrong in the moment.
/r/MGTOW19/04/21 09:52 AM
1

We'll see how it goes, but I feel like the whiny liberal white girls aren't as economically productive as some calm conservative man looking to make enough money to raise a family, you dig?
/r/MensRights19/04/21 08:46 AM
1

It should be applied both ways ​ You missed the point. Here, I'll give it to you with the genders reversed. If a woman doesn't have parental rights to a kid (yes unlikely, this is why child support affects men more), why should she have responsibility toward the kid? And if a man can't raise that kid without money from the mother, he doesn't deserve custody, he is an unfit parent, the mother should get custody. ​ Both statements are correct. Child support is wrong not because of custody being aw…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 08:44 AM
2

Yeah man I was half joking okay calm
/r/MensRights18/04/21 08:39 AM
1

Yeah, you're not wrong, but bro, "minorities." It's pretty self explanatory as to why they can't swing the vote that much.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 07:53 AM
1

No, because men don't complain as much as women.
/r/MGTOW18/04/21 07:53 AM
2

You mean minorities like Latinos, who're keeping Florida red? Ok but yeah, black people are having more kids, but they are 13% of the population, not close to half.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:37 AM
3

You can go back to your basement ​ Ooh, triggered much? ​ No sense in arguing since we obviously won’t change the other’s mind ​ You won't change my mind only if you are wrong, and illogical, which you are. I won't change your mind because you don't want it to be changed. ​ But you seem to refuse to see things from any viewpoint other than your own (at least from what I’ve read) ​ Proof? Tbh, that's not even required in a logical argument. What IS required is things like rebuttals, actual argume…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:35 AM
2

Conservatives have more children>More conservative population in the future>Feminism and leftist ideologies losing ground.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:16 AM
3

It is not to make you equal, it is to give women more rights. The reason is equality, not the aim. ​ And yes, it is bullshit, and has always been
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:15 AM
3

No, most people are like you, unable to come up with an argument, so they give up. Your life being "full enough" doesn't change the fact when a discussion is underway, either present your points or lose/draw. In this case I demolished your argument, and you didn't disprove any of my rebuttals, and made some very doubtful claims, so you were wrong.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:09 AM
4

> Not because I agree with anything you said just there, but because you seem like the type of angry human who won’t have their mind changed. ​ You mean, you don't have a logical argument to actually persuade me, or anybody else, that you are right/I am wrong? ​ >Definitely not one that supports equality! ​ No u. What does this statement even mean? How is this true? ​ >At the end of the day, if you feel like something being done to you isn’t right, tell the person. ​ Well, a lot of things happen…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 05:59 AM
-1

Hardly, but yes.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 05:46 AM
4

>“Women in general“ means that you’re categorizing all women ​ No it doesn't. In general means "generally speaking." Men have two legs, in general. It just means "most." ​ >I have quite a bit of proof for each of them. Do you want to speak to the multiple witnesses for two attacks ​ Not really, I've never been prone to believing witnesses, people in general tend to see women as victims. You could've easily started the incidents the witnesses will tell me were entirely not your fault. ​ >or the v…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 05:35 AM
5

Where are Twitter servers hosted? Where is the data stored?
/r/MGTOW18/04/21 05:35 AM
5

Lmao, you not only missed the point, but made some very illogical assumptions. ​ >Please don’t speak for all women ​ And? It's just a general statement. It's not meant to say all women, just women in general. ​ >The sexual assaults I’ve experienced ​ Wow, great way to change the topic. We're talking here about how sexual assault on men vs women is legally as well as socially treated, and you jump to "hey but sexual assault happened to me." Not only is this irrelevant, but do you have any proof? …
/r/MensRights18/04/21 04:49 AM
17

Imagine you pull up to a girls house and are about to fuck, then you whip out your smartphone and say "alright babe I'll need you to record your name and we'll choose a safeword OK?"
/r/MensRights18/04/21 04:03 AM
1

What? We don't complain about the mathematics, we complain about the fact that if it's my money, it's my choice. End of story.
/r/MGTOW18/04/21 03:56 AM
2

The correct thought process: "My mother loved me unconditionally, so I should love her unconditionally. If another woman loves me unconditionally (aka when a unicorn appears) then I will love her unconditionally."
/r/MGTOW18/04/21 03:43 AM
5

Yes, women often do what would be called "sexual assault" if done to them, without consequence. Fire is hot.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 03:40 AM
-1

Ooh you did a Reddit moment, good job!
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:15 AM
3

"muh incel" >tfw you realise beta simps actually get less punani than the men you call "misogynists"
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:12 AM
-5

Nobody likes you, beta cuck. Get out.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:06 AM
0

That's... exactly what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:05 AM
5

No, the comment above was at the top, perhaps I had collapsed that comment. ​ Yes, it's a generally true statement. It would be sexist if it were false. But, it's not.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:32 PM
7

Just a bunch of fucking dumbasses with not one actual proper argument.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:05 PM
-25

Nobody likes you, simp. Get the fuck outta here.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:44 PM
-1

>But making general statements like 'this is how women fight' ​ Who made this statement?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:42 PM
1

Except, nobody is advocating for gays to have equal rights. Nobody said anything about a theocracy. ​ You're just another piece of scum, vermin that isn't even worth spitting at.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:27 PM
1

Get a load of this fucktard
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:32 AM
2

The left can do both at the same time, while simultaneously blaming the "horny teenager" even though "victim blaming is rape culture" ​ They're so good at mental gymnastics
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:29 AM
0

Generally when people like you use that word it’s to refer to a version of marriage Clarify your statement ​ Tfw you can't even get your own statement straight but tell people to be clear. When I say I want traditional marriage, yes, that means I want less gay marriage. But legally, I support legal gay marriage. ​ watch this country burn ​ And you're also antinationalist. I may be in the minority, but you re even more of a minority here. A gay who absolutely hates traditional marriage. Nobody wa…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:21 AM
1

You said it was automatic and every time ​ Yes, automatic meaning most judges automatically assume it to be so, and not sure where I said every time but if I did that was wrong. ​ I think child support and alimony aren't fucked up as long as they are applied both ways ​ They are fucked up. Her body her choice, but my money my choice? If a man doesn't have parental right to a kid, why should he have responsibility toward the kid? And if a woman can't raise that kid without money from the father, …
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:16 AM
1

A general unfair bias, yes. ​ That's... exactly what I'm saying. Studies Show Judicial Bias Against Dads (archive.is) Judges just assume the woman should get custody. That's how it is. If both parents are normal people, the woman usually gets full custody. And on top of that, the man has to pay child support. AND alimony. Both of which are fucked up things.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:20 AM
0

>As a gay man if, you try to take away my right to marry l, I guarantee you I and many others will watch this country burn ​ Like many women and gays, you tend not to be able to separate the legal and moral. In terms of morals and values, I am in the minorities of MRAs. I'm socially conservative. In terms of policy prescription, I am staunchly libertarian. I support LGBT rights. ​ It's not that deep bro.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 10:53 AM
1

It's not like that happens every time. ​ Yes it does, that's part of the legal process. In custody, it's assumed the woman will get custody, unless she's some kind of psycho or something. If the guy wants custody, he has to contest it.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:33 PM
1

the body of the foetus. ​ Only till 8 weeks, and then the foetus is a living human. ​ If the father is out of the picture sure, the opposite would be true also no? ​ No, even if the father is in the picture. Also, they don't even have to inform the father that he is a father, lol. Also, women can easily make a father not have any choice in adoption, if they divorce and the father gets no custody, for example. That's also another privilege, actually. Divorce courts automatically assume custody fo…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:13 AM
1

I'm glad your world is so simple it's clear you are an awful person ​ What? What are you saying here? I would hope that this group as a whole disagrees with your views. ​ This group cares about "rights" not gender roles. So, I don't really care lmao.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 11:45 AM
1

What if the married couple don't want children. ​ Then they're a waste of time. Humans were made to make more humans. ​ What if the woman's eduction allows her to bring in more money than the man. Should a family live in squalor just to fit some sort of backwards ideology. ​ If the man is really bad enough at making money that if his woman stopped working, they'd "live in squalor," then he isn't worthy of marriage, lol. ​ I don't want to be forced to be the sole contributor for the family that's…
/r/MensRights13/04/21 10:49 AM
1

Those backward beliefs were supposed to die off when the old bigots ​ Maybe you're backward. Because my type of marriage lasts longest, lol. ​ that reality is a 50s fantasy ​ Nope, even today conservatives have happier, longer lasting marriages. ​ In reality women have jobs, men are allowed to cry ​ Men should only cry on rare occasions. It is good for men to be masculine, that means having good discipline over your thoughts and emotions. Women shouldn't work when their children are young, it fu…
/r/MensRights13/04/21 10:17 AM
0

Fuck off, I'm younger than you, I'm just based in reality.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 09:50 AM
1

Jesus Christ, you didn't learn grammar. When you respond "I guess every girl I know is an exception" to "which, rarely happens, and when it does, women have lower libido" then I assume you're responding to the part about women having lower libido, retard. In fact, you're STILL bullshitting that most the boyfriends of your friends aren't willing to fuck most of the time. So, you're fucking stupid either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 09:03 AM
1

Idk, you said we can't turn the clock back, I said we could. Whatever man, we'll see in 20 years. Have a good one.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 08:50 AM
0

>definition of traditional marriage ​ Virgin man and woman getting married, then kids early on, the wife stays at home and takes care of them, the husband goes out and makes money. ​ >and why is untraditional marriage a bad thing? ​ Higher divorce rate, earlier divorce. Just a generally unsatisfying life.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 08:49 AM
1

18 and 19 year olds are adults who can make their own decisions. No one has the right to prevent them from dating someone old if that's what they want to do. ​ Who talked about rights? Projection ​ You seem obsessed with old women dating legal adults ​ Didn't I say women AND men? And yet you only criticised my problem with one? Projection, AND sexism. LOL. ​ It's immoral to try to manipulate people into feeling guilty about their sexual preferences ​ I'm not manipulating anybody; saying that the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 08:32 AM
1

How can every girl be an exception to "men not fucking their partners"? ​ Do you lack the ability to form sentences? Fucking retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 12:13 AM
1

>You're criticizing them as wrong and immoral because you believe they should have sex ​ No, you can't read minds, so I'm assuming you're projecting. I have no "because." I'm criticising them as wrong if they are wrong, that's it. ​ >If someone wants to have consensual and legal sex with another consenting adult, there is nothing wrong or immoral about that behavior. ​ You think there's nothing wrong with an old woman/man having sex with a 18, 19 year old? Shut the fuck up. What's legal is not a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 12:06 AM
1

The only one pulling shit out of their ass is you. You're seriously saying the words "every girl I know is an exception," in response to the statement "women have lower libido"? It's well known that women have lower libido than men, so you're steady capping.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:58 PM
1

Yeah, I guess all those stats about domestic violence are bullshit. I guess it doesn't affect heaps of men either. ​ Yes? What stats? I mean, I've heard here that more domestic violence is reciprocal, so men aren't just "beating their wives," it's usually some kinds of fight, where both parties are guilty ​ In the 1950s, a single, working-class income in the US could support a family with a car and a yearly holiday ​ That is because there were less jobs, and people spent less frivolously. Also, …
/r/MensRights12/04/21 11:52 PM
0

>You're telling people who they should fuck to suit your own personal preferences of who they should be with sexually. ​ No, I'm not telling people anything. I'm just criticising the preference as wrong or immoral. Not saying anybody should fuck anybody. This whole thing sounds like projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:50 PM
1

The floor is included lol. Which is why most men make the cut. ​ And yet, even if you include the floor, the median, that's still not convincingly over 50%. You can't really say "most." ​ Technically both men and women because men are only really considered short if they’re around the same size as the average woman. ​ And tall if they're taller than the average woman? No, that's cap. Also, notice how you start comparing to women here. This is incorrect. You cannot switch back and forth, you are …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:46 PM
1

Sure, I guess if you're bullshitting hard, you could say that every girl [you] know" doesn't have "lower libido" than men. I totally believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:37 PM
1

If they’re significantly taller than most women ​ Define significantly? By what percent/percentile of women's height does a man have to be? ​ I’m switching back and forth because they’re both relevant ​ No, only one is, and you know which one it is. A 5'8.5 is significantly taller than the average woman, but isn't considered tall. LOL. ​ I brought up the median male height and compared it to women’s height to show that most men are tall enough to be tall. ​ Yes, but by that logic, only 50% of me…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:33 PM
3

No it doesn't, lol. Even an idiot can see that. Now you're being intentionally pedantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 11:21 AM
1

But some significant proportion of all men do. ​ Bullshit, no significant proportion of men beat their wives. ​ And a lot of men beat their wives in eras that we might consider conservative times ​ This is a myth. Men actually used to be less thuggish and used to love their wives more. Can you post proof. Proof or cap tbh. ​ There's a lot of other factors (economic, social, technological) you'd have to rule out if you want to make the case that it's due to changes in gender roles. ​ Economy has …
/r/MensRights12/04/21 10:15 AM
1

The floor for women’s height preference is the median male height ​ So is the floor included or not? If not, then most men aren't tall enough. ​ by I’ve said tall means tall on the male distribution ​ You've just done it again. ​ Women are “short” in comparison to men ​ OK, so it's according to the male distribution. So, now we are comparing to men. OK. ​ So a 5’4 man before you even start judging him against men will be considered “short” because he is the size of a woman ​ But if he's the "sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:08 AM
1

In comparison to the average woman? But again you miss the point. This post is about being tall, not taller than the average woman. Nobody said "taller" before you tbh. Women look for men who are tall FOR MEN. You even admit this, in your logic trying to justify it, saying "median male height is 5’9 most men are that tall or taller." That isn't strictly true. The calculated median is 5'9, but the average median could easily be slightly lower, making less than 50% of men "fit the bill." See how y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:03 AM
1

>becomes male disposability ​ But it doesn't, women actually values men's lives. Not to mention working hard improves society. ​ >"Aggressive" becomes bully behaviour and uncontrolled rage with your spouse ​ No, conservative men don't generally beat their wives. We're talking about men who actually fit conservative ideals, now, remember that. ​ >but at the cost of wholeness and balance for both. ​ But we don't need "wholeness" or "balance" for both. Just an overall balance and a happy society. Y…
/r/MensRights12/04/21 08:43 AM
2

How can "most men" fit the bill of being tall? SO 5'6 is tall? Even 5'5? No, that is not considered tall. Not women singular, yes, but not women plural too. Because "tall" means tall on the male distribution, and so less than 50% of men are tall. Do you not understand year 10 maths?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:37 AM
1

He is correct. You have only replied to him here saying "taller." Women CAN'T be mathematically right for preferring "tall" men as "tall" implies higher than the 50th percentile of men (leaving 50% of men as worthless). Now, TWICE you've clarified tall means tall on the male distribution, not taller than the average woman, because you agreed 5'4 was "short", even though that is average woman height. If your comments were in reference to men's height as compared to woman's height, you would call …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:31 AM
3

No, criticising the preference doesn't imply that people who don't meet that preference should have sexual access to them. That's a non sequitur. ​ For example, I could criticise an old woman for liking young men, even if those men are above age. That doesn't imply that I mean older men should have sexual access to that woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 08:21 AM
3

Which, rarely happens, and when it does, women have lower libido. It is not that cruel then, when that does happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:27 AM
1

>I'm not sure what you mean. I didn't give any specific examples of unhealthy gender expectations for men. ​ Yes, but I KNOW all the examples already ​ >That clock isn't going back. Too many other pieces have already moved. It's like saying we can all go back to fuelling our lamps on whale oil. ​ Don't be so disheartened, my brother. Conservatives are having more children than liberals. The people are waking up to the failures of today's society. We will bring back the traditional marriage, one …
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:45 AM
16

Misandry kills
/r/MensRights12/04/21 03:05 AM
1

>unhealthy gender expectations on men ​ Almost none of what you call "unhealthy gender expectations" are ACTUALLY unhealthy if women also follow gender expectations.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 03:00 AM
3

How is it misogynistic? Where did he say "women bad"?
/r/MensRights12/04/21 02:59 AM
1

I'll just point out that I agree with this in essence, just as a matter of semantics I think men do legally ​ No, we don't. We can't choose at any point for sure, whether we want to raise the child or not. Custody is often given automatically to women. Men can't opt out of child support ("financially abort") while a baby is still in the womb. Meanwhile, women can kill the baby before a certain amount of weeks. Women can always give a child up for adoption or drop it off somewhere. At any point, …
/r/MensRights11/04/21 11:33 PM
1

Are a large amount of people I've encountered who call themselves feminists completely wrong? ​ It may be so. Did most of those people not advocate for women's rights? ​ You're justified in saying they've never given men rights but really, what rights do either sex have right now that the other doesn't? ​ Men don't have the same parental rights as women, not even close. Also, in many jurisdictions, men don't have the same sexual rights as a woman. It's just not a crime, in many countries, for a …
/r/MensRights11/04/21 12:34 AM
1

That's not a legal issue. It's a bad thing, but alimony and parental rights impact men the most.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 11:54 PM
14

Men's parental rights need to be a top priority tbh. ​ That, and then alimony.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 11:26 PM
3

Tbh, there is no "toxic" laddish culture. That's some bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 11:24 PM
1

I don't decide who can and can't call themselves a feminist. They define themselves as feminists. ​ No, but YOU'RE the one calling them feminists. Regardless of what they are, your logic is "since they are calling them feminists, I can call them feminists." Feminism isn't self defined. You ACTUALLY have to hold certain beliefs to be part of any ideology, really. ​ Your argument is circular. It relies on itself to be correct. ​ You messed up here: Any feminism that defies these limitations set ou…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:52 PM
6

Average FDS user:
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 01:31 PM
6

Men are the best, we literally made advanced society possible. Be proud of your gender. And be sure that no matter what anybody says, gender roles are good. Just wait it out for the right girl, who will cook and clean for you. Trust me, if you act like a king, a good woman will treat you like one.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 09:47 AM
4

>Also, how is "taking a girl for coffee" MGTOW? ​ Well, yes, dumbass, taking a girl on a date isn't MGTOW, but assuming you did, yes, you'd split the bill over any check. No head, no money.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 09:12 AM
3

Yes, and is a girl you're trying to bang your friend? ​ No
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 09:11 AM
2

Well, he isn't owed sex. But that's the point. If a woman doesn't give sex after a first date, unless she's marriage material (nonexistent nowadays) she's not worth the second date. It's just common sense.
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 09:09 AM
1

And also, alimony and child support exist, still, which largely affect men, since courts are biased and give women custody automatically, and men make more money than women, (by choice, the wage gap is a myth).
/r/MGTOW09/04/21 09:03 AM
1

Ultimately it's unprovable. You can't prove feminists, the feminist movement, or people who identify as feminists ​ Yes, but that's only because YOU define those people as feminists. By definition, some of those aren't feminists, and those that are feminists by definition, are not for equality, unless they are also MRAs, and most aren't. ​ "equality between the sexes" ​ So MRAs are feminists? Egalitarians are feminists? No, feminism is specifically for women's rights. Even if we use that definit…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 08:18 AM
2

also think that Google's definitions are (by definition) super condensed ​ They are an Oxford Google collaboration. I said Cambridge, but I was wrong, the actual source is even more trustworthy. ​ A 14 word summary via Google isn't able to sufficiently define all of its current breadth ​ That's because you are using your own definition, which is something like "any movement that claims to be feminism." Well, if you do that, not only is that definition poorly defined, ironically enough, but it's …
/r/MensRights08/04/21 10:23 AM
0

people like to hire people like themselves ​ False, proof or LARP. Also, how did men become the employers in the first place? I wonder... ​ Men are just viewed as more independent ​ No, we ARE more independent. Men have better negotiating skills, and work harder and for longer hours. This shows more ability to be independent. The very fact that men go for higher paying jobs shows that men are and can be independent. Do men make women pay for dates? ​ Each individual person ​ Yes, but this isn't …
/r/MensRights08/04/21 12:01 AM
0

Oh, you’re defining successful as billionaire? ​ No, it was just an example. Oh, you're defining "example" as "definition"? ​ men and women included, and each has their own set of “privileges” which propel the ​ What privileges do men have?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:48 PM
0

And what that means is you’re saying that women rarely become successful without affirmative action. ​ Yes. There are far more male self made billionaires than females. It's just facts. ​ You’re being a sexist dick, and saying that most women can’t. ​ Not really, because most men can't become successful either. It goes both ways. It's just that even when women are successful nowadays, everybody knows they were helped by wokeness. When men are successful... well, they can't have been helped by af…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:59 PM
2

>The definitions of feminism that are most widely used specifically state that they aim for equality ​ No, simpleton, the definition is "the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes." The reason is equality, not the aim. The aim is to increase women's rights, on the premise that women have less rights than men, which has simply never been true. Even in the 50s, many of the legal issues that face men today were still present. At no point was the situation that men had…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:58 PM
11

This is feminist theory
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:22 PM
0

No, that's incorrect. The whole point is that I'm ignoring the rare cases where women do become successful without affirmative action. "Generally" implies that such women exist. Damn, you're fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:18 PM
2

>I don't quite agree with your implication that anyone who aligns with or calls themselves a feminist is automatically unable to be for equality. ​ No, the implication isn't that someone who "calls" themselves a feminists is unable to be for equality, but that by the definition of feminism, feminists can't be for equality. You've ignored my entire argument.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:04 PM
0

"Generally speaking" ​ Can you read bro?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:58 PM
3

>more on attacking feminism than actual discussion of men's rights ​ Proof or cap. Also, one comment from me doesn't count as the sub's whole views. ​ >So basically, it isn't achieving it's goal of helping men's rights ​ Yes, it is, because that's mainly what we post about. Also, this isn't JUST about rights, despite the name. We discuss social issues too. ​ >You said yourself that some feminists are alright, but how many comments do you see actually bothering to make that distinction? ​ It's po…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:23 AM
5

I don't give a fuck if I'm not your favourite guy This is not blind hate, it is justified criticism of a lopsided, morally bereft ideology. It's not binary absolutism, because some feminists are alright people, but sticking to the definition of feminism, feminism is wrong. Also, yes, I care about men's rights, although you clearly don't.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 08:13 AM
5

He didn't say all women, so it's not a blanket statement. He just said that generally speaking, successful women got there through AA. Which is true.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:18 AM
2

There's two ways for societal attitudes to go, if we are to be truly equal. Either men and women are seen as one and the same. In that case, yes, a man should be open with his feelings. Or, we could go back to how it was in the old times, when men and women were seen differently but still equally. It's sort of a tradeoff. Men have to be masculine, but then women also have to be feminine. In terms of emotional availability, masculine men don't get depressed by small things, because that means the…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:53 AM
3

FDS? Tbh, don't worry, the combined IQ of that place is about -18, none of the stuff they say makes sense.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:45 AM
15

See the thing is, this whole "toxic masculinity" thing is bullshit. Masculinity is great. Most men are willing to be closed off and stoic and masculine and all that. The reason that the suicide rates are going up is because women aren't doing THEIR part. Women nowadays complain more than they do actual work. I saw a post on FDS about how women do all the household work, while completely ignoring how a) it's by choice, which means it's not an "equality" issue, and traditional marriages last longe…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:43 AM
1

Why don't we do r/FragileTwoX or something?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:18 AM
22

lol, imagine if the genders were reversed. The outrage would be amazing. Anybody want to post this in a few months with the genders reversed and see what happens?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:15 AM
5

Proof of misogyny or LARP. Also, feminism and "other subs" deserve hostility, because they are morally wrong. Even first wave feminism was bad. So yes, you can expect hostility towards hateful ideologies here.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:10 AM
16

And that proves what? There is affirmative action for women, and this is an example of sexism against men. The comment might be sexist if a lot of successful men used affirmative action, but they didn't. So no, that comment isn't sexist at all.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 02:08 AM
2

And? Men receive less health funding, so shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:30 AM
31

Was this the wrong place?
/r/MensRights03/04/21 09:18 AM
1

No, then you'd have Klinefelters. You'd get a few brownie points but not as much. You know, you don't even NEED two X chromosomes. That's the funniest part of r/TwoXChromosomes. All you need to be female is no Y chromosome.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 09:09 AM
1

The problem is, it is very easy for women to exploit the fact that men are so horny, and they can just easily give in to this, and start an OF, fuck tons of guys etc. What would be hard for them is not to do any of this. SO, men admire women who take the harder path, rather than the path of least resistance. And we spite the women who don't, especially to the extent of basically becoming whores.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 09:03 AM
12

The group-think is real, I saw this post on here recently: My girlfriend hates men with a passion what do I do? : Advice (reddit.com) ​ All the comments are like "oh well most violence is man on woman, and society is pro male and misogynistic, hurr durr, so she is justified"
/r/MensRights03/04/21 02:45 AM
17

That sub is memes, man shouldn't have posted there if he wanted serious help
/r/MensRights02/04/21 10:33 PM
37

Because a) this is Reddit, a misandric place that has stupid double standards that make no sense and b) because society in general thinks women can't be shitty assholes.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 10:15 PM
1

Okay, then in that case there would be some fixed date where if the biological father has to turn up and say yes or no, at 4 or 6 weeks in. Otherwise, it is assumed no, and if the man decides yes, then he can opt in.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:56 AM
2

How about both? You only get to physically abort a baby until 8 weeks because after that the baby feels pain, has brainwaves, and is human. To sweeten the deal get to financially abort at any time, but men have to make it clear whether they will support the child before 4 weeks, otherwise obviously guys could rope women into giving birth. ​ Fair deal.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:54 AM
3

"Epidemic of rape and child sexual abuse" ​ Yes, except 50% of child sexual abusers are female, and while men commit most rapes outside of jail, a man is far more likely to be assaulted, killed, etc. by another man than you are to be raped, assaulted, etc. So see men as predators, go ahead. But considering most men don't think enough men are rapists, murderers etc. to be scared of men, you probably just hate men. ​ >women entrusted men with their children ​ Notice how it's always "their children…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:35 AM
1

Then read the flair. What does it say?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:05 AM
1

Nice
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:37 AM
1

Why would you shave a newborn baby? Wouldn't that be painful?
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:36 AM
5

It's hypocrisy. The media will support traditional gender roles, as long as they disadvantage males/advantage females but will attack them if they disadvantage females/advantage males. ​ IMO, gender roles are good. I will happily go to war, and happily leave the women to stay home, but only if women get less rights. Or, alternatively, none of that shit applies, and both men and women have to apply for some kind of national service. Or neither gender.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:32 AM
2

>I really do believe everyone is equal ​ You do not. ​ >I am assuming from your comment that this does not go both ways. ​ The difference between me and you is that you believe everybody is "equal" as in the same. I instead believe everybody deserves equal treatment from the authorities. ​ >I'm am a woman and I have experienced victim blaming both against myself and a flatmate. ​ You have not, I don't believe you. Any proof? ​ >I am not condeming people who advise people to take precautions ​ Yo…
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:18 AM
2

>I believe all people are equal ​ You don't. ​ >As much as it is hard to imagine in this day and age, women are repeatedly blamed for their own assaults and murders. ​ Bullshit. I know for a fact when a woman gets killed, people bemoan it as a tragedy, and when a man gets killed, nobody cares. Stop capping. ​ >I explained my points clearly and politely. I never once insinuated that you were in the wrong, yet you chose to attack me. That is not the proper way to win an argument. ​ And yet, everyb…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:06 AM
1

>that’s not productive lol ​ Can't you see the post is flaired "humour"?
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:45 AM
2

>I didn't say you had said that. I have heard it elsewhere though multiple times. ​ Then that's irrelevant. ​ >Women have been blamed for their own death because of what they were wearing or where they were ​ Bullshit, never happens to women, always happens to men. Men are victim blamed for their own murders much more often. ​ >On average women are weaker and less able to defend themselves from attack which increases nerves. ​ Which leads to the conclusion that men are attacked more than women, …
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:59 AM
2

>But women do also have a much higher probability of being sexually assaulted or even raped ​ Still not true, if counting prison rapes, but I'll allow it. ​ >Just because men get murdered and harassed too doesn't make it right. ​ What? Who said it was right? We're talking about how justified it is for a woman to be scared of people on the street. And the fact is, women are less justified than men in feeling scared, because men are more often victims of violent crimes.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:21 AM
1

Lol, the woman couldn't think of an original joke so she stole one made by a man. ​ I literally heard this one like 15 years ago, shit's old.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:09 AM
2

Men are more suited for leadership, purely because the human brain sees men as more "leader-like." Appearances DO matter.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:02 AM
2

>often assaulted or abused than men ​ STOOPID
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:46 AM
1

Low gonial angle, robust nose, and negative canthal tilt. Tall forehead too. ​ Yeah, she looks a little masculine for sure.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:42 AM
1

Well, that's sort of the whole point of leftist ideologies in general. They don't like categories. So they make women more masculine, men more feminine, and on top of all that, they say pronouns are based on what you think you are, not what you are, just to muddy the waters even more.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:38 AM
0

>certain men as inferior based on their traits, behaviours, opinions ​ And? Some men are worse than others. Also, we don't do this whole "internalized" bullshit here. Misandry is misandry, plain and simple. But this man just hates himself.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:32 AM
1

No, the problem isn't about blaming men. Blaming men for a problem is okay, so long as you aren't doing that just because "muh patriarchy" and the man is kind of responsible. ​ In this case, yes, men are enabling this. We need to crack down on shitty women like this.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:30 AM
7

FDS stands for Female Dickhead Strategy. They're quite literally mentally held back.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:26 AM
2

Adult Obesity Facts | Overweight & Obesity | CDC Alright, a bit higher, but nonetheless, 42.4=/=70.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:23 AM
4

Ha, you thought!
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:21 AM
9

"miovic reinhardt associates general contractor" I believe. I know quality is poor, but zoom in towards the bottom of the door.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:15 AM
1

Trust me, no girl wants to be obese. While yes, nowadays the "thick" look is trending, even in that body type, the girl is still supposed to have a skinny waist. ​ Anyway, unrealistic body expectations don't really exist. As long as you eat healthy, and workout, your body will appear attractive to the opposite sex, regardless of how IG sees you.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:13 AM
1

No, I think that's overweight and obese, not just obese. About 36.5% of U.S adults are overweight.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 07:05 AM
2

No, she's making fun of men who have smaller penises in the first place. ​ It's "toxic masculinity" (masculinity can't really be toxic, toxic masculinity is a bullshit term) in a pretty clear way. It's just that here, it's being used by a women to make fun of men, so it's alright.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 06:10 AM
1

Even the few men that actually do that are looked down upon by society. ​ Meanwhile, society expects men to say yes to women.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 06:04 AM
3

Even though men commit so many murders, not only are women more likely to be killed by somebody they know (rather than some stranger) but men are the victims of murder the majority of the time. Men have much more reason to be scared for their life on the street than women do.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 05:52 AM
34

Rich ladies love using infant foreskin cells in their creams, it makes them go crazy.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 04:45 AM
3

If it's rape when a man takes off a condom, this is quite definitely rape. ​ Unless you just mean how it's legally defined. But yeah, the law SHOULD be equal, although it's not.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:55 AM
33

Said the users of Twitter, an app created by a man, on a phone, which was likely- ​ Ahhhh fuck it, you all get the gist
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:53 AM
1

Not even "inequality" exists, bro. ​ You have to realise this. The only inequality, economically speaking, is that women receive more benefits from the government. ​ Men are SUPPOSED to be making 1 dollar for ever 70 cents or whatever it fucking is. We're literally just BETTER at making money. Why? More of us are at the higher end of the IQ distribution, and those that aren't smart are willing to do hard physical jobs that pay above average.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:49 AM
2

Men are more physically capable than women. Fire is hot.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:46 AM
1

Watch old shows. They are better
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:41 AM
2

By they, he means feminists ​ Nice try bro
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:37 AM
1

>an integral part of their social life ​ That's not really true, at least not to the point that you have to get drunk to get social. And that's barely worth the risk. ​ >Poont being that practically everything you do, involves some risk. ​ See "risk vs benefit." I already know bro. But going out and getting considerably drunk is not worth the risk; it's a foolish endeavor.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 11:08 AM
70

Yeah, as if that makes it so much better. When I get murdered, my mother will be like, "oh well at least it was a guy" ​ Feminists truly are stupid
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:18 AM
2

>I'm in East Asia, where you'll see small but tangible remnants of a male-led society. ​ That's not first world. But yeah, that's male led. That's alright though, even first world countries are "male led." Even though Biden barely has testosterone in his blood, bless the poor old dude, he's still a man. There's nothing wrong with all leaders being male, as long as they are democratically elected.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:11 AM
1

Yeah, but you have to walk outside to live a decent healthy life. Risk vs benefit.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:08 AM
1

>Drinking doesn’t lead to nefarious activities ​ Not really. It's not a causal relationship it but it increases the chances of someone else doing something bad to you. Or you doing something stupid.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:42 AM
3

>'what was she wearing' thing because that's still a common rhetoric in my country ​ Where do you live? The Middle East? ​ >Tbh this includes me, when I was sexually harassed as a 10-yr-old. ​ Now I see it. So this is why you think the world is patriarchal. That's sad, and I feel bad for you, but a few people saying that doesn't make the world patriarchal. Most people still blame the perpetrator, not the victim.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:39 AM
3

>To be fair in a lot of non Western countries the "what was she wearing?" Is a legitimate question in the community so they can judge a girl after she's been groped, molested, or even raped. ​ No, no, and no. I have fucking never heard of that. It's always a thing to talk about it BEFORE the fact, yeah, but not after. ​ >you may be relegated to a very poor existence and a rather unpleasant one depending on the country because you will be ruined for marriage if opinion sours ​ Same with a man? Do…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 07:23 AM
3

>surveys ​ Lmao ​ >1 in 3 (30-35%) of men would rape if they knew they’d get away with it. ​ Suuure, that's totally not a bullshit manipulated data set.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:46 AM
-15

>out and getting drunk, they are trying to get into trouble ​ Perhaps not trying, but they are well aware that something bad will happen
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:39 AM
6

>I guess the most common would be sexual expression and/or sexual relationships? ​ Lol, and this proves what? Men and women are different. Yes, men have to have game to get many women, that is entirely the point. For men, the hard thing is to have lots of sex (because women won't just always say yes) so men who manage to have a sex with many women are praised. For women, the easy thing to do would be to have sex. It requires little to no effort to do so. So then, women who never have sex are doi…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 09:24 AM
5

First one: The fact is, cops kill black men less when you look at kills per 100k encounters. ​ Also, like 0.1% of men are convicted rapists, and most rapists are convicted because they are repeat offenders, and eventually get caught. Most of these men are in jail. So yes, notallmen is not only true, but even notevenasignificantproportionofmen would be a correct hashtag. But you can tell why the former hashtag is more popular. ​ Second one: It's not our job to do that. What, you're complaining ab…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 09:05 AM
4

Best not stay with her much longer. Unless you can make her think logically, she's not worth it.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:47 AM
1

I hope she gets only daughters, please, if there is a God then make sure this woman's husband shoots X sperm only.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:43 AM
2

>men still have certain ethical grey areas where if you do it, you're the man, but if we do it, we're -insert derogatory female slur here- ​ Name one such ethical grey area, then proceed to explain how that shows the world is ruled by patriarchs, or "patriarchal in nature"
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:41 AM
2

Such a study would never even be conducted today.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:35 AM
1

I mean, the problem with that is, that even though women are supposed to be clean, they are allowed to forgo this when they act promiscuous. ​ I would be okay with the whole "men unclean, women clean" concept if it was applies consistently, but it isn't.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:32 AM
24

Exactly, and even of those people that they know, the % who would rape them is very low.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:25 AM
3

They legitimately blame all of it on toxic masculinity. ​ As if masculinity can be "toxic." No, masculinity isn't bad or good. It can be used for either, but clearly, men use it for society's net good, that's why civilisation exists.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:22 AM
1

Damned if you do, damned if you don't
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:20 AM
2

I think the mostly male parliament will probably be the ones making the law on that, not some random feminazi circlejerk group with a power fantasy
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:18 AM
1

excludes it from being used interchangeably ​ The aspect that you simply respect them slightly more, and have some kind of confidence or trust in their character. It's just not the same as admiration
/r/MGTOW217/03/21 08:06 AM
1

That's just deep respect. And do you "revere" your friends or wife? No, one does simply not do that.
/r/MGTOW217/03/21 02:02 AM
1

But it's not about falling under, it's about being synonymous. ​ You respect your friends in a different way that you respect other people. You can admire them, but that is different.
/r/MGTOW217/03/21 01:48 AM
2

Not admire though. Admire would imply looking up to them.
/r/MGTOW217/03/21 01:15 AM
0

>If you still are of the attitude that the things that used to be seen only as female should still only be occupied by females due to them being inferior ​ No, we think that not due to them being inferior, but being feminine. Women should do feminine things, men should not, that is the logic. Teaching is not feminine, btw. Actually most teachers used to be men, and teaching used to be male only in some cultures. ​ >The reason most men loose custody over their own children is because child care i…
/r/MensRights16/03/21 07:31 AM
1

>Hitting someone is not a ladylike action ​ True, but it may just be an involuntary lapse. Also, getting hit by a woman doesn't really hurt now, does it? ​ >restraining ​ I just said I won't hit her back. I would still restrain her. ​ >man hits a woman, it's okay ​ The whole point of a gentleman is that he has discipline over his actions. A lady may not, but a gentleman is always calm. You're not much of a gentleman at all if you ever hit a woman without provocation.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:05 AM
2

Well, that's part of being a politician. It's not about being the best leader that gets you into a role, it's about being voted in there. ​ The fact is, a male candidate will be perceived as stronger and more intimidating, more like a leader, than female candidates. And I mean, part of being a leader is being someone that people are happy to see as leaders.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:44 AM
2

I may get downvoted for this, but for me it honestly depends. If I know the woman and she is generally good and honourable and feminine, I won't hit her back. If a woman acts ladylike, I treat her how a gentleman treats a lady.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:29 AM
2

So, can women who are infertile not have an opinion on abortion? Can female lawmakers not legislate on men murdering men or taking drugs? Or how about; can nobody talk about or legislate on what somebody else does with their body, because it's not their body? ​ Feminist logic is stupid.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:21 AM
1

And until you remind them feminism is defined as being about women's rights, under the assumption that only increasing women's rights leads to equality. ​ So much for equality.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:21 AM
2

>I have a good number of downvotes with very little response to the actual point ​ That's because we don't overwhelm people with tons of little comments which then pressures people to reply to every person. As for this comment? Hey, you asked for it.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:18 AM
1

>born 30% stronger ​ Keyword; "born." We are born that way, there is not unequal treatment from the government making us stronger. ​ >don't need to care about being considered beautiful ​ So? Not only is that societal expectations, which doesn't matter, because they are still equal in the eyes of the law, man also have an equivalent standard. Women rate a whopping 20% of men as average, when they're being honest. Also, women always have the option of makeup, and claiming "body shaming" if somebo…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:47 AM
4

'privileged' ​ No, because females specifically have legal privilege. They can force a man to have sex with them, and even if that is proven, in some cases, they still won't be charged for rape.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 09:44 AM
-1

Bro. That worked like 5 years ago. But now? Women are ACTUALLY more supportive of weak men. Now, they ACTUALLY hate strong men who don't take their bullshit
/r/MensRights10/03/21 09:40 AM
8

I agree with everything other than the attitude of the last paragraph. Legitimately just say what you said in the first two paragraphs to such a person, and they will at least question their own beliefs.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 09:38 AM
7

True. The only reason us not showing our emotions is a problem is because we can't help ourselves anymore. That's one of the most important things about masculinity. To be able to be self sufficient. We could be our own therapists, but just not in this SJW world where men aren't so masculine anymore.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 09:36 AM
9

By whom? ​ I mean, I wasn't taught anything. I just realised one day it's not masculine to be undisciplined with one's emotions.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 09:34 AM
1

As in when you buy a cake, you can either have the cake (with "have" meaning consume, as in "I have a cake for lunch") or you can eat it, not both.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 07:04 AM
1

Well, that's just what it's called. It's not actual armed conflict. It's conflict, yes, but is not yet a war.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 06:59 AM
2

There would be no such war, men need women and women need men. If women were to revolt, as in just stop working, like they did in Spain, but for an extended period, things might get a little messy then. But that's it. No gender war is possible.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:39 PM
4

I challenged a feminist to tell me ONE right that men had that women didn't ​ She called Selective Service "the right to hold a weapon in a warzone" ​ At this point, most feminists are brainwashed idiots
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:35 PM
6

The difference is the Trump and Kavanagh never virtue signalled so hard, and have probably taken the "innocent until proven guilty" stance
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:31 PM
2

The difference is, when you say this, we laugh, because nobody really gives a fuck if "men are being attacked" ​ Nice try, loser. "WE WILL BE TREATED AS BADLY AS WE TREAT WOMEN"? Seriously? That's the best ad hom, strawman bullshit you could pull?
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:13 PM
3

Lol, house chores shouldn't even come into the equation, considering this whole "unpaid labour" stuff is bullshit. Where do men get recompense for spending their money on their family? Is that not the same as doing housework for the benefit of your family? Yet feminists still complain about it.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:10 PM
2

Yeah, r/AmItheAsshole is filled with vermin tbh. A truly disgusting, shit, subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:07 PM
2

What a fucking worthless shill you are, huh
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter