TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zaronax Archive

View 3 posts and 168 comments by Zaronax on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

It really is. It's become increasingly prominent, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 11:26 PM
67

How do you possibly determine who is and who isn't an "incel"? Redditors, Twatters and the likes have the answer for you: Everyone they disagree with is an incel. Seriously; this is a world that suddenly places value on treating having sex with women as a proof of worth from someone. I never expected the same group claiming "women aren't sexual objects for men!!!" to turn around and declare people worthless if they never had sex with a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 05:56 PM
39

The very most irritating part of them whining about "whataboutism", is that it's their very first defense any time someone mentions male issues, often completely unprompted. "Male genital mutilation is still legal and it shouldn't be." "Yes well, what about women huh!? Some still suffer from it!! And it's worse for women!" Those two statements can live together; genital mutilation, for either genders, is disgusting and should be illegal. But it's not because a tiny fraction of women still have i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 10:03 PM
10

It is, won't stop them though. Fully expect to have your social life and name ruined for doing the right thing, as well. What's the saying again... Tyrants tolerate no criticism or something? Anyway, the fact one can criticize men/partiarchy until they puke a-la Exorcist and become purple in the face from the lack of air, all without any backlash from anything other than a minority of people who'll push back should be indicative enough to those who pay attention. There's only one ideology that i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 09:24 AM
2

It's the opposite of that one but I can't seem to find it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 04:01 AM
73

Anyone who claims that men have "Main character syndrome" should be reminded that TVtropes exists and that there's very much an explanation on just how ridiculous that notion is. We're shown men as being the endless armies of mooks who get destroyed by every badass that exists, cookie-cutter villains and whatnot. Meanwhile, the trope of https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MenAreGenericWomenAreSpecial or https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MenActWomenAre or https://tvtropes.org/pm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 12:44 AM
10

Sadly true... Went on the johnnydepp reddit and my god. The number of "I'm a feminist but" depressed me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/22 04:20 AM
50

I'll be frank; I think they're maggots feeding off of the putrid carcass of feminism, which used to be a movement that was necessary in it's very infancy in order to bring actual improvement to women. Was it perfect? No, it wasn't. But it was necessary that it exists to start a public discussion on equality. Now, however, they're closer to what a terrorist state having full control of the social discussion and using it as a hammer to slam on everyone who dares disagree with them or who dares to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 08:46 PM
26

Pathetic. Something close to 40 organizations had the galls to sign this and declare there's a "fundamental misunderstanding of DV" in this. They're literally implying a man cannot be a victim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 02:07 PM
10

No, they're both crimes. It's simply the gravity of the crime that changes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 02:22 AM
18

Conservatives are very much just as guilty, if not more, of this. Why more? Because they tend to remove the funds that could and should be attributed to this situation, along with typically perpetrating the worst myths about how "men don't cry", etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/22 09:09 PM
1

Deleted my other comment, just saw yours and those are the numbers I saw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/22 11:15 PM
16

God yes. I'm so tired of people actively limiting themselves to very narrow labels. It's like people who identify themselves by their sexuality. That's cool, you're attracted to vwxyz, but... what kind of movies do you like? The music? What's your favorite color, food, animal? Do you like winter? Summer? Autumn? Spring? Sexuality tells me none of this, it makes you part of an informal blob. But you know what doesn't? A name. A person's name doesn't carry anything other than themselves. The sexua…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/22 06:39 PM
37

They have this idea because most of them are also rich or upper-middle class. This is the truest statement about this subject. It's typically upper-middle, high class people who "talk down" to others about how they should feel about issues. They're also the first ones to immediately attack anyone of the groups they think should "agree" with them when they show the first sign of mildest disagreement you can imagine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 06:45 PM
5

We're not sure of it since most of it is contemporary sources, but they'd usually have a "different" education than men. They'd still receive education if the family was privileged, though, since education was a symbol of status. Being literate was a very enviable thing in many, many cultures. Plus, there are records of women attending extremely prestigious universities dating back many, many, many years prior to feminism. It just wasn't as common as men, since men were very much expected to car…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 11:46 PM
11

Reminds me about when women complain about beauty standards, and complain about how they have to buy a new dress every time or whatnot. I'd be happier if they didn't go shopping and drag me into it, turning what should've been a quick 30 minute shopping for what we both initially wanted into a 3 hour session. God I hated when that happened. I'm the dude who'll speedrun through a library, check literally every book I think is going to be good and be out of there in 20 minutes flat. I can be out o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/22 03:06 PM
23

Yeah, no. One of the big reasons is the constant portrayal of women as sacrificing more than young men while they're not being forced into conscription. Seriously: some consider the tradition of leaving the workplace (voluntarily) to start families while the husband brings in all the income as a "sacrifice", while the husband's probably being worked to death due to having increased economical stress. Same for the "they take care of the elderly of the family" portion, which they ironically forget…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/22 06:29 PM
15

More than that, they're easily digestible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/22 02:47 PM
4

I despise this kind of journalist weasel language. Expected by whom? By other journalists who are in need to push a "controversial" topic to fulfill their self-imposed virtue signaling requirements. Typically Feminist journalists, in cases like this, who'll also make up lies about how "bad" this is for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/22 02:40 PM
12

One of the best reason to open ourselves up (the Left, not us activists), is to reduce the amount of disenfranchised young men who turn to the only source they perceive will accept them: extremist groups, typically to the Right since the Left's extremism is heavily dominated by conversations about Racism/Sexism/Etc., and other "unsavory" (quoting since the term isn't strong enough to indicate my dislike for them) groups of questionable people and of questionable repute. These same people will in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/22 11:26 PM
49

200k comments being erased by "mistake" is pretty much grounds for the entire department to be "mistakenly" fired. Also, Feminists and due process is akin to water and oil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/22 04:37 AM
48

People will raise the counter that: "Well that's because women's heroism isn't acknowledged!!" Forgetting that even the press doesn't talk about it. They'll probably also claim that "Women sacrifice everything constantly and no one thinks it's heroic!", comparing stuff like a stay-at-home mom (by choice), to someone who jumped into a fire and saved 5 kids before ending up in a hospital, in a coma, due to the burns. They'll also probably claim that "It's only right that men sacrifice their lives …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/22 03:16 PM
5

That definition of sexism can be translated to: If you accept the reality of the situation as demonstrated adnauseum by nearly every institution but without their spin on it, you're sexist I think that tells everyone all they need to know. These "researchers" probably counted disagreement with a women's opinion as sexism and seemingly wouldn't know the difference between Earnings and Wages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 12:52 PM
1

Yup. It's fun, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/22 09:55 PM
11

I'll forever point out that there was an article in the Guardian which pointed out that, among all deaths worldwide between the ages of 10-24, 61% of these were young boys between 1950 to 2019, iirc. This is the article in question. can you imagine had this been 61% young girls? The stink raised? But yet, the Guardian is the only major publication to have talked about this. It's freaking 69 years of a major difference in death rates. Nearly twice as many boys dying per year than young girls. It'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/22 03:17 PM
20

We cannot live in a patriarchy if the overwhelming majority of social power and megaphone belongs to Feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 08:54 PM
11

If they call you gay, pussy, etc., in a derogatory manner you can report it. Especially if they call you "pussy", that tends to get people suspended. If it's more of a male-centric insult, they'll just say it's not hate. Fun times, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 03:55 PM
39

The "1 in 4 homeless are women" slide is a thing of beauty. Not so much as how good of a message it is, but because it directly points to the pure hypocrisy behind the "patriarchy!" and the "society only cares about men!" talking points of feminists. No one can convince me we don't actually live in a very feminist-centric world, where women's issues are tackled constantly while men are left to die at the wayside before they point at their bodies yelling that it's their privilege that led them to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 03:50 PM
1

Agreed. It would seem discriminatory to start young boys later than young girls, rather than simply start both at a later date when they are more suitable towards learning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/22 06:44 AM
10

Good luck! You're doing incredible work and it's a necessity thay we have people like you willing to do the job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/22 05:53 AM
77

It's the concept of controlled opposition. They claim to care about men's health to delegitimize any movement about men's rights by saying "we're already doing this, you're just lying about us not doing anything!", while also knee-capping any possible attempts to put these words to the test. They infiltrate spaces where men talk, or complain that men have spaces they can't infiltrate. At the same time, they'll pass themselves off as part of the "crowd" while usually saying the vilest things that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 07:53 PM
17

@last page It's because facts only matter and exist when they're on the side of whoever holds the stick. And given that Feminism is extremely busy with creating this, objectively false, patriarchal structure, they can't admit to facts that indicate it's inexistence. If we were in a Patriarchy, women wouldn't be perpetrating it. Feminism is busy telling us that "women are the ones raising all the kids, all the time!", while in the same breath telling us that "fathers are the reason for the moral …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 04:55 PM
3

You forget how many aren't truthful for ideological purposes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 10:28 PM
17

Just a bit exaggerated for emphasis purposes, she never beat him half to death but the rest is accurate. I definitely took inspiration from my experience arguing with people on this. They're busy trying to claim that she never said "I Johnny Depp, a man" but instead said "I Johnny Depp, man". Because, you know, that totally changes the following "see who believes you" portion. I'm still flabbergasted by how people can mindlessly defend someone who changed her story of the events 4 times in 4 dif…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/22 04:34 AM
32

If the woman was the abuser, then they both abused each other. "But he raised his voice and yelled! Clearly he's an abuser!" "She beat him half to fucking death twice already and she's been verbally and emotionally abusing him for years, and now that he's raised his voice once it's mutual abuse? What the fuck." "You just don't get it you apologist!!!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/22 02:10 AM
71

Victim mentality. They cannot be anything but victims and men cannot be anything but perpetrators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/22 04:49 AM
25

Of course they were, feminists have the public soapboax right now and they all spew the same rhetoric in order to undermine any semblance of reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/22 04:46 PM
18

You'll probably see how women have it worse by every privileged metric while systematically ignoring how men die at rates completely out of touch with the rates of women. That's even when the rates of other things like victims of sexual harassment, assault, etc. are in similar states with a couple of percentage going one way or the other. Reminder: Between the years of 1950 and 2019, in the age bracket of 10 to 24, 61% of all deaths (worldwide) were young boys. Sixty. Fucking. One. Percent. That…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/22 02:11 PM
3

Fair enough, my bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/22 10:39 PM
1

It's been my experience as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/22 09:30 PM
3

Make him hear the screams of a baby getting circumcised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 01:14 PM
2

Because they mostly realized that they were past equality and had reached the level of being more privileged. So now they're rationalizing it with Equity and a push to enter better jobs under the guise of "fighting for the little people".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/22 03:08 PM
3

Oh god, we're going to get brigaded for a bit won't we...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/22 11:17 AM
3

I rewatched the Black Christmas movie today and my god was it cringe inducing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/22 02:18 AM
30

The dogma suffers no dissension. Very few will ever engage in good faith argumentation and most will resort to whataboutisms in order to justify their actions or how they're very much ignoring men's issues in favor of women's issues all the while ignoring the fact that we're concerned about those issues, too. They seem to believe everything is a zero-sum game, in my experience. Not that long ago, I got into a debate with some people about circumcision and kept getting told how women had it worse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 04:00 AM
37

Indeed. The arc of Feminism is reaching it's maturity. This is, completely, the logical conclusion of a movement that was gendered from the very start, a movement that saw the woes of the other gender and decided they didn't want the woes, they only wanted the positives. The right to vote without conscription, as a famous example. They saw men dying in droves in hard workplaces; some women wanted access to these places because they were interested in the jobs but many thought it wasn't for them.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/22 05:46 PM
35

I mean... are we surprised? Women and children were the only ones allowed to leave.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/22 06:44 PM
13

If only it were true. From what I'm seeing, it's simply reaching it's logical evolution.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/22 12:28 AM
2

People you trust are one step away from being people you don't trust. There are so many "retrospective" accusations that you literally cannot do anything that could be misconstrued.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 06:17 PM
18

Yup. It's terrible how much she lied on the stand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/22 01:56 AM
45

I just have to point out that the tape where Amber tells Johnny that no one would believe him is even more incriminating in nature. https://youtu.be/2u25CEwpnNY It's the part where says: See who believes you or(and) sides with you. It's the thing that tips the boat for me. She's trying to isolate him so much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/22 08:17 PM
9

I enjoyed them prior to 2015~ or something close to that. Then they turned muuuuuch too woke for me. (TYT)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/22 03:22 AM
7

When someone starts with "My Truth" my teeth start aching from the cringe and I tune off. It's either the truth or it isn't. Truth cannot be co-opted into an alternate reality because you viewed it differently. Arg. (Not adressing you specifically with that last part, just ranting.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/22 11:47 PM
21

There's no way they'd admit women can be misandrists or misogynists. They blame men for everything. Clearly, only men would tweet or spread hate, according to them. They also equivocated "Men feel responsible" to "Men are responsible", which is a fucking disgusting misrepresentation of facts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/22 10:03 PM
2

What a ridiculously weird take. "I hate men". "I hate women". You're comparing them to mosquito and somehow think you're maming a good point. You're truly not. As for "it changes the meaning!" No, it doesn't. Why? Because we're talking about hating a specific subsection of humanity in both of these situations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/22 02:48 PM
26

Why? because not enough men do it. Are you serious or are you just not aware of the social implications of fighting for it when the mainstream is 100% Feminism driven? oesn't mean men don't. It implies men don't. You're moving goalposts here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/22 05:29 PM
35

Men should fight their own fights instead of relying on women Right here. The number of men who do is negligible. Yeah, you know why? Because doing it paints a target on their back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/22 05:16 PM
51

You're implying we aren't. What the other person is implying, instead, is that no one gives a fuck if it's a men talking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/22 04:47 PM
9

Time to push for the US citizens to create waves everywhere about this. Protest everywhere. It is your human right and there is no negotiation when a human right is taken away from humanity by some close minded idiots. The number of states who have passed laws that forbid even abortions from incest... I'd be worried.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/22 02:54 AM
10

The fact that the 1st link can be amended to "42 years" makes me stupidly sad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 08:13 PM
22

The patriarchy often attacks men because they're men and men are threatening. /s (I'm joking)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 08:12 PM
2

Glad to see another enjoyer!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 09:04 PM
3

Excellent explanation on this subject, I think you'd love Nate's videos on the subject which have very similar points to yours. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa--WfHJAtQ He's also got some very good videos on various legal subjects, very much worth the watch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 08:19 PM
6

Careful, their brains will explode and their eyes melt from seeing this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 01:12 PM
10

It's typically done with double think. They only believe women they agree with, the rest can die in a fire-y pit of hell and they wouldn't bat an eye. Some would probably cheer. It's scary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/22 05:41 AM
5

So I agree in essence ; Roe v Wade is flimsy and should be shut down. But that should come with a new legislation that guarantees the rights to abortions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/22 04:14 AM
1

I didn't mean to make it about MAPs, it was more a commentary on how society made their ideal world a reality and how revolting it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 02:12 AM
20

The author never said that you need to disbelieve Amber, the reason she said "I don't think I'd believe her if she told me the sky was blue" was in ironic reference to how much she lied on stand and how much she's been debunked on stand. If anyone is interested in this, Camille's cross was an effective bombardment from orbit that just... obliterated Heard and her credibility. It was short, sweet, vicious and to the point. If anything, watch the redirect. It's about 30 minutes, of which Elaine ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/22 04:44 PM
2

I'm sorry, what. the. fuck. You have to be exaggerating, right? MAPs can't have managed to achieve their utopia this quickly, it's impossible right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/22 04:30 PM
32

Pretty much. Men have lived both extremes for the entire history of mankind. The top of the spectrum account for so little that it doesn't even register as a percent in the entire human history for the number of man who held power versus man who died in pointless wars.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/22 03:32 PM
1

I'll post this now since I'm listening to Legalbytes' stream where Ian (Runkle of the Bailey) and Rob (Law and Lumber) are now in the court room, watching this live and telling the rest of Lawtube (Nate the Lawyer, Legalbytes, Virtual Legality, Good Lawgic, Uncivil Laws, etc.) what the jurors are doing... And apparently, the jurors are very much not interested in what Heard's saying or peddling and some looked visibly annoyed with her - no one really taking notes (one faking) and they joked abou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/22 09:37 PM
11

And as direct ammo, too. I'd say figurative but it's not really a figure of speech given how quickly they dispose of men in situations of combat... Literally isn't the word either since we don't actually become bullets. All in all, we become actual ammo to be used and shot at "enemies" simply because of our gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/22 05:57 PM
10

Neither of these things discards their opinions on the matter, it simply means they're flawed individuals that we'll disagree with on some points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/22 05:54 PM
8

I agree that this is most definitely a push for a bigger workforce. It'd explain why they don't give a shit after the baby's born.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/22 03:42 AM
3

No, it really isn't. I get that you're not watching the trial, but you should've easily seen where she claims to have only accepted things that fit her narrative. She was literally challenged on how she discounted doctor notes when they didn't fit her viewpoint and how she attributed no points or thought to them in her notes. Next, she omitted filling all the required information and only claimed "well they're in my notes" (when her notes aren't in evidence) when trying to explain it, even when …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/22 03:48 PM
1

It says you've quoted the opinions of youtubers without formulating asingle argument of your own. That's not looking down on them - it'slooking down on you lol. You're willfully ignoring the fact that you removed their titles and reduced them to mere youtubers - which they aren't. But again, dis-ingenuousness is exactly what I'd expect from you. Also, I've formulated my own opinion quite often - I simply bolstered it (again, how odd that I use the word "bolster" whenever I talk about my points, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 11:31 PM
1

I haven't thrown away the credentials of the lawyers you've quoted nor called them idiots, like you have done to me. You've literally just quoted the opinions of youtubers, you haven't formulated a single argument of your own. I think this says it all. You have strictly no value in this discussion, as shown when you straight up didn't know anything about the case beyond what happened in the UK. And even then, you went on a rant about what he should've done without even educating yourself on the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 09:55 PM
1

Freaking lol. "You've just quoted the opinion of youtubers!!!" Who have law degrees, faces and names you can track. But sure my little arrogant buddy! You know better even though you've had a video showing the reality of the matter. You know better, even though Ben Chew stated it, as much, in court. You know better than the guys Depp and his team brought forth to evaluate the damages. You know better than the Hollywood agents who correlated it to Heard's allegations. You know better than EVERYON…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 07:12 PM
1

It doesn't need to be the central point is the point. He's inferred to being an abuser. That's literal defamation. Next: The judge itself stated that JD had a very valid case and is the reason she even moved forward with it. The irony is still present in you. As for the 12 minute video : Yeah, it's to explain the difference which you seemingly don't know even though you claim to be a lawyer. Edit: Also, this video was posted when he knew exactly nothing about the case. To try and bolster your po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 04:31 PM
1

Except you don't talk with facts and law. Want to talk facts and law? Legalbytes, Nate the Lawyer, Uncivil Law, etc., are all talking about facts and law. So far, they're in agreement that JD's got a shot at this because, get this, he's proving that he's indeed been defamed. If he's found to be the victim, which he absolutely clearly is - as proven by the audiotapes -, he was then defamed by his abuser because, get this, she alleged he was the abuser. And since he's suing for defamation per se h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/22 02:58 PM
1

Men. Men do. After all, according to popular theory by FeministsTM, we live in a patriarchy. Men are less likely to share power with other men but much more likely to share it with women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/22 02:14 PM
2

This is when a men would be eating pepper spray by the can and would get their legs nearly crippled while 5-6 cops jump him to bash him with their batons. But male privilege, y'alls! Getting jumped by cops is an obvious indicative of privilege, of course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/22 02:11 PM
4

Update : JD's lawyer did a piss-poor job of attacking anything the quack said. Rather than asking "Yes/No" questions and forcing the quack to answer in Yes/No, he just let her talk as much as she wanted and the Judge seemingly decided to refuse to bring in Amber's abuse towards Tasha, regardless of the fact that she allowed AH's team to bring in UK trial stuff in the same situation. It's pathetic. Terrible. This dude did such an horrible job that even the lawyers I'm watching were seemingly crin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 04:09 PM
2

I understand what you mean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 04:51 AM
2

I was putting emphasis, not meant as shouting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 04:49 AM
1

Seems quite conceivable to me that it could happen, so how does someone go about proving that it is absolutely impossible? Because, get this, I quite literally explained to you what the power dynamic was. Abuse is about having power over another person. There are VISIBLE differences in the power dynamic when a person is the abuser versus the abuse. So visible, in fact, that we can observe them. Case in point : The JD trial where everyone can tell who was the abuser and who was the abused, simply…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 04:22 AM
1

No, but are you? I've literally linked to you a little thing called "let me google that for you". The results are leading experts on this topic. Also, an appeal to authority is a solid fallacy that you should prevent yourself from ever doing. Particularly when it concerns a topic as researched as this. And with your logic of: Do you want the question of identifying the one and only abuser in a relationship to some sort of finger-pointing "he/she started it" game? Gravy. you are straight up imply…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 04:10 AM
1

No, I can absolutely say it doesn't exist. No serious literature supports the notion of mutual abuse. None, whatsoever. https://lmgtfy.app/?q=mutual+abuse+is+a+myth
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 03:55 AM
6

This lawsuit is about difamation, not domestic violence. Johnny will mostlikely lose it, and rightfully so, because his lawsuit makes no sense. What do you mean, it makes no sense? She defamed him by claiming he was the abuser in a relationship where she proudly proclaims that she was happy to punch him to preserve her pride. Where she gloats at him for being a victim. Their social status does nothing other than highlight how this can happen to ANYONE. To try and use their social status as some …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 12:43 AM
1

Mutual abuse is a myth and simply doesn't exist. Abuse is about a power dynamic where someone takes control of the other and ascertains that control constantly over them. Gaslighting, insulting, demeaning, degrading, victim blaming, etc. Yelling at someone because they've insulted you for years, have been violent for years and have even cut a part of your finger off, isn't abuse. It's defense. Self-defense. Auto-preservation. Anyone who says the words "mutual abuse" is doing nothing more than pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 12:37 AM
17

Yeah, this was nearly 100% "Amber said" testimony, barely any expert testimony and even then, her "expert" testimony was demolished by herself when she condemned her methods and then promptly resumed them immediately after.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 09:35 PM
1

I agree. Even if I hate her and she gave me extreme anxiety, don't false review her. However, prior to even this starting... Her review were awful. I think it was something north of 1.4.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 09:06 PM
10

I wish I did. I really wish I did. But I managed to deal with the anxiety up until now and the worst is finally past. I am currently in anticipation for her to be utterly obliterated in the cross examination. I want her to be so discredited, the Jury will grind their teeth hearing her voice in the redirect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 07:53 PM
24

It's infuriating. I nearly bit my finger to blood due to stress and anxiety.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/22 07:25 PM
13

Dude, glad to see you back. I'd been wondering where you were at for the last few months.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/22 02:03 PM
4

Right? I'm a hidden billionaire with ties to the Rothschild and I'm constantly plotting to empower the Patriarchy further. /sarcasm (Just in case we get some weird lurker that doesn't get that I'm joking and willfully exaggerating.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 08:48 PM
48

You don't understand; They don't care. They can violate the rights of men whenever they want, obviously, only those with the biggest institutional power and benefits from that power, can be made to die in battle without any choice. Obviously. I mean, what else are we supposed to do with this overwhelming power? GET PEACEFUL LIVES AND GET COMFORTABLE LIFESTYLES? Pfff. No, we have to make sure that we're made to stay, fight and die. Who needs human rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 04:36 PM
2

Even intersex people tend to have a more prominent system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 03:36 PM
26

I'm under the "conscription is justifiable under exceptional circumstances" but it needs to be gender neutral at all times. For example, Alien invasions. Or existential threats where anyone and everyone is required to fight to try and save as many people as humanly possible. Short of, say, your country being locked down by another country or surrounded on all sides with no escape possible, I'm against conscription.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/22 03:41 PM
2

Wtf is "cis gay"? Holy shit their vocabulary changes meaning so fast, i can't even keep track of this. Spend a month out of social media and it's like you'll have spent 10 years out in the wilderness...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/22 03:46 PM
12

God, the number of times I've been told that. When I asked them which other societies where this much alleged power was given to a group and allowed insults at them from the "oppressed" group, they never had anything to answer with. I'd love to see them try this if they lived in an actual oppressive state. I know they wouldn't, because it's actually dangerous but still. I don't wish harm on anyone - simpy wish they'd accept their "courage" isn't courage, when they know intimately they won't face…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/22 03:42 PM
97

It's a constant underlying issue with the social justice movement. You ask them to replace a "non-oppressed" class in their sentences and have them replaced with a minority or something similar. The answer immediately becomes "WELL IT'S NOT THE SAME!". It's incredible how good they are at mental gymnastics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/22 11:24 PM
7

You forgot how he testified to her throwing vodka bottles at him and they then claimed how "he was in a vodka fueled drunken rampage". Like, all of this is available on the internet. Wtf is wrong with these twats. Edit : Played in court - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EddgruFST64 Watch the reaction of lawyers, many of whom knew next to nothing about this case. It's damning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/22 08:35 PM
70

So I'm going to say something that might be mildly controversial after reading the comments. The anxiety this person describes might be real, but this anxiety is misplaced and is a complete result of the fearmongering the media has been doing towards men. "All men are rapists", "all men are potential assaulter", etc., that rhetoric WILL create an undercurrent of paranoia within women in general. By extension, this creates a very, very, very harmful and hostile environment towards young men who w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/22 04:07 AM
2

You don't understand, they want to be recognized as the exclusive victims in every occasion possible because victims have political power now-a-days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/22 02:24 AM
12

He's already left his position. I'm not sure if JD's trial was his last, but I think it was. Don't quote on me on that, though, as I have no certainty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/22 03:32 AM
48

Depp wasn’t allowed to use medical evidence or audio recordings and instead the judge went with her testimony because why would she lie? That pissed me off so much. The judge was utterly biased towards Heard and her Cronies, allowing them to amend statements, giving them cues on what they'd testified to prior to the court case, etc., but he was reaaaal quick to attack any of JD's witnesses that had even the smallest amount of mistakes in their testimony, even if it was closer to their actual tes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/22 08:42 PM
31

The evolution is incredible, isn't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/22 08:39 PM
8

Words have meaning. To suggest otherwise is just plain wrong. Otherwise, you could claim "hi" is a Feminist word for "Love", rather than a greeting. Even if I say hi in the middle of a phrase, it remains a greeting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 04:26 PM
1

You're aware that sociology is PREDOMINANTLY DOMINATED BY FEMINISM, right? IE: Social studies are OVERWHELMINGLY dominated by a single gender and they're OVERWHELMINGLY taught by a single ideology. It's the same thing as Christians saying that it's not their fault witches were burnt in the 1600's, it's the government that did it. You're purely shifting the reality by implying your girlfriend is qualified and is neutral while hand waving the reality that the qualifications she has are taught unde…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 04:21 PM
25

Hey look! Lesbian victims of violence are ignored again!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 08:32 PM
21

The fact that people are finally realizing what I've been screaming everywhere for the last few years feels great. Imagine how many lives would've/could've been saved had they listened a little bit earlier, rather than claim "all MRAs are X-Y-Z".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 04:25 AM
3

It comes across when you read the messages. They say "I feel ostracized (but men are why I am)".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/22 08:42 PM
16

Shh, we can't bring up the reality that those who mostly fought and died to get where we're at are... men. Men are the devil! They always victimize everyone, except when they fight and die, en masse, to try and combat tyranny, fight and die to try to save those they love, all the while women get to blame the same men fighting and dying (FOR THEM) for everything wrong in the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/22 08:39 PM
10

Yup, but then that's including female staff on males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 12:56 AM
10

Hell, the numbers in the lesbian community alone would demolish that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 12:55 AM
24

It's definitely not a lesser issue because one is socially acceptable and the other absolutely isn't. I'm pretty sure you can guess which is which. Also, you hear FAR, FAR, FAR, FAR, FAR more often "men should shut up", "men need to be quiet", "men are all rapists", "all men should die", "men are all X", etc., than you hear the reverse. It's absolutely everywhere. You just don't pay it the attention it deserves because it's such a common issue that you gloss over it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/22 04:13 AM
31

They're fine with traditional gender expectations for others, not for themselves. It's a pure "fuck you, I get to have my cake and eat it too".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/22 04:10 AM
18

Don't think anyone disagrees with that but this isn't part of the premise nor what the context is. The context is that the person who made the OP said her husband and his friends had a duty to put their physical well-being on the line for a stranger, without knowing anything of the context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/22 09:47 PM
3

We're talking about the Woke crowd being progressive only when it suits them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/22 01:13 AM
7

What do you think Mooks are, exactly? Why do you think every other villain is a man with the very rare, but usually very empathetic, woman? Pay attention to 99% of media; Men villains are rarely given any background beyond "they're evil" versus female villains who typically have a heartbreaking backstory that makes you empathize with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/22 12:59 AM
4

What do you mean, don't all men want sex all the time with any women who deigns to look their way? /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/22 12:53 AM
23

They're only progressive when it benefits them. If they don't have to sacrifice anything, then they won't mind maintaining these traditions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 02:07 AM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hydrophilic#medicalDictionary https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hydrophobia You're attempting to sound smart but the fact is that these terms are properly used within their own spheres. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hydrophobic having little or no affinity for water.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/22 10:52 PM
1

Oh, I absolutely agree, just wanted to make sure to other people who could stumble upon your comment that there were legitimate reasons for those fears back then. Not so much now, naturally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 11:42 PM
0

Because words have meanings and having words be denatured for the sake of sensationalism is a plague on society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 11:41 PM
3

I'd keep it a constant, honestly. The issue is that they make sure to mention it if it's something that'll get them clicks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 11:40 PM
1

Then "phobia" isn't the proper word for it. You can't use and twist an actual scientific term "phobia" (IE: Extreme fear of) and then have it mean 6 different things and wonder why people are getting annoyed at how ridiculously wide the word is. https://www.healthline.com/health/phobia-simple-specific A phobia is an excessive and irrational fear reaction. If you have a phobia, you may experience a deep sense of dread or panic when you encounter the source of your fear. The fear can be of a certa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 09:52 PM
4

To be fair about the "not being allowed to donate blood", I'm pretty sure that's a lasting after-effect of the AIDS epidemic which was VERY MUCH within homosexual men circles and I'm also pretty sure that they've been getting better at allowing gay men to donate. Still a lot of work to do, but there was legitimate reasons behind it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 09:43 PM
2

I don't understand why it can just be something on its own, why does it have to be minimized at all? Call it what it is. Are you aware of how ridiculously ironic this paragraph is?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 09:21 PM
12

Yes. It's a CONSTANT. Same shit happens when a victim is of white ethnicity. It's not mentioned and often made ambiguous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 09:15 PM
15

No, that's entirely because of how we raise kids. Guys have to be successful or be failures and girls are told they only deserve the best.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/22 12:10 AM
4

All of that is perfectly understandable and it is very commendable to prioritize the newborn's future than immediate satisfaction. I'm sure you'll make great dads.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/22 02:26 AM
22

We called the national institute for the equality of women and men, they told us as men we cannot be considered discriminated. If you have that in writing, anywhere, as an answer, I'd recommend deposing a formal complaint as institutional sexism. And your story nearly made me cringe, instead I had to bite the inside of my lips. Disgusting series of events that are all too believable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/22 05:22 PM
12

I've noticed the same thing. The big one, for me, was when woke "journalists" started writing about "has woke culture gone too far?" following the release of the new LOTR series. (I'm not here to start a discussion on this, simply pointing out that this was my big revelation that the pushback was starting and that it was going to snowball hardcore.) Last year, that same article title would've been utterly impossible to even be conceived; Can you imagine the backlash that would've followed? But t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/22 06:13 AM
7

Report all of them for hate speech. They're literally victim blaming but can't seem to understand their double speak: They always claim women are the ones raising the kids, thus they're the ones who have an actual influence on "the boys". If there's an actual problem for boys and girls are outperforming them everywhere, maybe the society isn't a patriarchy like they so love to claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 03:55 PM
0

Very little. The reason they pursue these jobs is because these jobs are also judged as crucial to society. IE: Men's interest contributed to building society to it's current extent and society judges some of these interests (science, technology, etc) as being crucial to it's own development and thus is willing to pay more for these jobs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/22 05:58 PM
17

Color me surprised, I'm glad it worked. I gave it a cursory glance as well and reported a few comments myself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 06:07 AM
30

Won't change anything. Hate is only hate if it targets non-white non-male people, according to just about every hate report I've done. Edit: Imagine this; they're literally terming themselves with one of the most hateful group in human history and they don't even understand the irony of it. It's like the KKK waving a flag saying that they're Nazis ironically, without understanding that they (for all intents and purposes) are essentially the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 05:45 AM
2

Why do you think they only ever quote "proven false" to justify ruining people's lives over accusations that aren't proven either way? "Believe all women" is a direct indication of that. It directly implies that you should believe all women until the accusations are proven false. I'm questioning your intent in ignoring this very real mentality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 08:34 PM
26

Because the research will often combine "unproven" with "proven true" and then pit it against "proven false". Bias. It's everywhere and you can see it often enough that you should've implicitly known the answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 01:29 AM
1

Given how wide feminist beliefs and values are, that's like saying "yeah well, everyone who thinks equality should be the baseline is feminist". Feminism doesn't have a hold on beliefs that composes it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/21 09:35 PM
3

So, I entirely agree with most of this but I'll forever disagree with this: By pretending race isn't real we'vemade ourselves unable to understand racism and xenophobia and fighttheir causes effectively. Race is a construct, it isn't supported by any real science and has been debunked enough. What it boils down to is a concept of clannism. Someone's different from me, thus they're not with me, etc. It can be seen in so many myriads of facets in the way people interact with one another, it's not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 12:10 AM
11

Eventually it'll blow up in their faces. It's mind boggling that they don't see the direct correlation to this and the rising trend of other movements that are "hating" on Feminism. (Hating is used liberally here, they're really just done with the stupid hypocrisy being peddled by them.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 03:50 AM
12

Agreed, but one of the ways we could easily fix this is by encouraging (and subsidizing) men to take breaks to be with family, too. Paternal leave is incredibly important to maintaining a healthy relationship and is also incredibly important in bonding with one's child. By subsidizing and encouraging paternal leave like maternal leave is in many countries, we directly fix this disparity in how having a child affect either gender. Society needs to stop treating men like machines and instead needs…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 04:47 PM
41

Ah yes, the "equality for us in what we care about, not for you" patriarchy that... has men be objectively worse in every metric that matters aside from the mysterious "wage gap" that doesn't exist beyond the earnings gap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 02:37 PM
7

"It's self-imposed by the patriarchy and men are just fine anyway, they're privileged and don't face problems!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/21 04:42 AM
58

It's weird how even the littlest amount of positivity about being a man can bring tears to eyes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 02:29 PM
31

How did none of this make news... oh wait.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/21 07:39 PM
3

I think it counts dildos as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 04:58 PM
44

You forgot for #10 that, in many countries, men cannot legally be raped by anything except another men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 05:00 AM
5

But Bernie isn't center-left is the thing, he's a firm liberal. You and me both seem to identify with Bernie's policies, which means we're actually old-school liberals; but this ends up with us being center-left in the current political spectrum because the edges of the Left has gone ridiculously far in the last 6~ years or so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 01:22 PM
17

I wonder if you, like me, only identify as Center-Left because of how far the Left now is. My political position hasn't change since 14 years ago, 11 years since I can vote... But I've definitely noticed that my position is more centered than it was. It's like, the Left is moving so far that I'm seeing them curve towards the Right. It's frightening.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 01:04 PM
9

the “It’s a trap!” meme definitely referred to trans women. No. Like, legitimately, no. That meme became a thing in the West following the advent of Manga and Anime culture, for which "It's a Trap" referred to exactly what OP described: Very feminine men who'd dress up in cutesy ways, or in a more gender neutral outfit. Then, one of the characters would "fall" for that person, try to flirt with them only to be hit with "I'm a guy", followed by a really shocked face with, usually, a cast of backg…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 05:08 PM
3

Who could predict this would ever be the case...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/21 07:24 PM
5

I'm so glad this made it on a mainstream source. So really freaking glad. But, then, I can't help think that we'll see the usual "But women!" or the timeless "PATRIARCHY!" rethoric to shut it down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/21 12:54 PM
3

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47006912 Erased the other link because it was wording itself dishonestly. "Associating" was used as a catch-all to describe anyone interested in equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/21 12:42 PM
50

Feminism, where women are strong, capable and autonomous while at the same time being weak, incompetent and incapable of making their own decisions. It all depends on the circumstances. It's unsurprising the movement has little support in countries, with something like 67% of women in the UK not identifying with it. It's sad, really. Rather than admit women are fully capable, they much prefer having this image of being Davids versus Goliath. Or we could say, Davida or Davina. It's infentilizing,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 04:16 PM
26

They'll disagree. They don't just don't see or accept it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 01:31 PM
10

It teaches them their own boundaries but it also teaches them guys don't have a right to any.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 02:11 PM
2

You are correct, I mixed both.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 10:57 PM
5

As others have mentioned; Alimony.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 08:11 PM
4

I think woman should have the choice to abort their child And I were ever in the position where a partner wanted to get an abortion I'd actively try and get her to stop and if she got it I really couldn't see myself with her after that. Are conflicting statements. You're actively emotionally threatening your partner if she doesn't comply with your view.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 08:10 PM
3

That's a bit of wishful thinking. They'd spin it as "men bad, men didn't do enough and we did our part".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 06:17 PM
2

Mildly unrelated, but I wonder if the body of a transwoman would react differently to a pregnancy compared to that of a born woman?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 12:56 AM
1

Many thanks, the scihub one simply didn't work for me, sadly. Edit: Damnit the research is locked on that one, huh...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 11:32 PM
11

It's a boogeyman. Essentially, it's some invisible power they can point to that cannot be confronted because it can't be proven or disproven, since they'll just deny any proof to the contrary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/21 07:12 PM
2

u/forgetaboutthelonely Could you give me a link for the last portion? The sci-hub doesn't work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/21 07:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter