TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Zathail Archive

View 0 posts and 140 comments by Zathail on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No women are collecting DHS checks for alopecia as a result of this ruling. Well. Yeah. That wouldn't happen even if the ruling said so as there are no 'DHS checks' here in the UK where this case occured... There are DLA and PIP cheques though. Still incredibly rare given almost everyone opts for the direct monthly DWP bank transfers.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 02:57 AM
1

Still are a thing. Today 10.2% of American men are part of a labour union alongside 9.5% of women.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:57 AM
2

I mean, Adolescence was filmed between March and September, 2024. Trump won the American elections in November 2024. Post production takes an average of 6-12 months. Adolescence released approx 6 months after filming ended. So yes, it very much came out after Trump got into power as that's quite literally the time scale it takes.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 04:59 PM
2

To get the young male vote who Labour are currently pushing towards Reform.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 08:48 AM
0

Yeah 'misia' is right there but people dont like it because it doesnt "fit right"
/r/MensRights12/02/25 04:52 PM
6

Ah, see, you've made the mistake of thinking they can't negatise anything - you'd likely find that in the next "infographic" gun ownership statistics are "proof of male insecurity" and "patriarchal control" etc etc
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/25 01:29 AM
33

This'd also lead into the 'male loneliness is deserved' bracket in the comment section
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/25 10:56 PM
3

which actual law The Representation of the People Act (1832) Much like how the common argument here regarding the legal definition of rape, the legal definition of a voter was changed to only apply to males. (https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/houseofcommons/reformacts/overview/reformact1832/#:~:text=The%20Representation%20of%20the%20People,created%2067%20new%20constituencies)
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:33 AM
-7

No. Since 1884 over 60% of men over 21 could vote. As someone used to arguing these points against feminists I find it quite funny I'm now having to argue the opposite. Edit: whilst i understand why people would downvote my other comments this one is quite literally an objective historical fact.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 09:01 PM
2

https://archive.ph/Ny0cO
/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/24 06:50 PM
-8

The majority being excluded is irrelevant to my point that it was the first instance of specifically defining a voter as being a male. Prior to that on the rare occasion women met the criteria they did indeed vote. vast majority 2.77 million men were conscripted. 2.67 million volunteered. This is a slight majority not a vast one. Conscription has only existed twice in the UK. 1916-1920 and 1939-1960. You have also decided to ignore that from 1941 the conscription laws included conscription of wo…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:08 PM
-12

piggyback on the drive for male suffrage The problem there lies with the fact that men and women had equal voting rights up until 1832 when the law was changed to specifically exclude women. Prior to this all expansions in the electorate applied equally to both genders. 1918 marked the end of additional suppression that was quite literally brought about by sexism.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 01:32 PM
15

You must be new here considering mens rights groups have been protesting this for 21 years now.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 05:24 PM
1

feminists dont like the selective service of draft Its not women doing this to you Funny that considering their stance when it comes down to war. E.g. WWI: the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) – Britain’s largest suffrage organization at the time – expelled its pacifist members and encouraged its members to put pressure on men to enlist (the white feather movement) shaming men who remained in Britain. Or the Women’s Social and Political Union who took on a stance so pro-war a…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 09:07 AM
2

Austin has called on his fellow male teachers to do better. Rather then asking the 80% of teachers that're female?
/r/MensRights04/12/24 07:58 AM
11

The feminism sub remains the only one im banned from, they seem to be randomly handing out bans to people here.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:40 AM
3

Ah, see, in their mind they don't because the news is always filled with reports that rapists are getting released early. Which, tbf, is true.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 04:34 AM
2

always has been Sips tea
/r/MensRights20/11/24 01:38 AM
2

No it doesn't. Forced to Penetrate is covered by Section 4(4) (specifically relevant here parts (c) and (d)) which (like parts (a) and (b)) carries up to life imprisonment just like Rape (Section 1) and Assault by Penetration (Section 2).
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:11 AM
2

The conversation on getting the act amended got killed back in 2020 after the official government response to protesting it was: "no point changing the definition as its already a crime with equivalent sentencing guidelines." Which is at least true. Section 4(4)(c)&(d) does give the maximum of life imprisonment just like Section 1. Reality is it doesn't give male rape victims any closure as their assailant, in the unlikely case they are charged, will be considered to have commited a crime thats …
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:02 AM
3

You can evidence the opposite, however. With feminist organisations such as Rape Crisis England & Wales, Fawcett Society, Justice for Women and Women’s Aid all having supported the act without pushing the fact it excludes female perpetrators. Then you have the MPs themselves, some of the more prominent ones that helped introduce the act and remained silent on male victims include: Fiona Mactaggart, Vera Baird and Patricia Scotland (who was the MP that fought hardest for the specific wording of t…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 07:29 AM
3

Johnny Deven Young pleaded guilty to a count of assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury and four counts of illegal use of tear gas, all felonies, as well as five misdemeanor counts of hate crimes, according to court records. He also admitted sentencing enhancements for the personal use of a deadly weapon and hate crimes. Young has a prior misdemeanor hate crime conviction in Nevada, according to prosecutors.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:05 PM
16

An Anaheim man and self-described “incel” who admitted to committing hate crimes by pepper-spraying multiple people Key thing you've overlooked is the fact he actually admitted to it being a hate crime. Like, it's not a great example to point at and try and argue shows judicial bias.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 11:50 AM
1

And then I'd say it took until 1960* for all men to get the right to vote without condition. 31 years after all women gained this in 1929. And 42 years after most women (1918-1928 women under 30 couldn't vote. This was because parliament wanted to try and balance voter numbers by gender at around 50/50 - the population was around 1.1:1 women:man in 1918). Further, 'Men' as a class didn't actually have a free right to vote for 48 of those years - voter privacy was not given and bribery not banned…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 10:18 AM
27

You see the same thing in the UK. Equal voting rights existed from the dawn of british democracy up until 1832 - something feminists here never mention - however was based on plutocracy meaning the vast majority of both sexes had no voting power. Of the 86 years of male only voting (1832-1918) - during none of which all men vote (it took until 1918 for the initial 60% of men to gain voting rights) - 63 of them occurred during the Matriarchal reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) which really pisse…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 03:50 PM
2

To put it simply, its not that mens health gets ignored but that what works for women doesnt always work for men and usually its simpler to get a positive outcome for women quicker than it is men due to genetic factors. Generally, the biggest issue to men's overall health outcomes is testosterone. Testosterone, unlike oestrogen, is a general immunosuppressant (there are exceptions to this such as parasitic infections in which testosterone is potentially quite beneficial). Cancer, in particular, …
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:27 PM
10

She had previously given a completely different description of the offender when she reported the crime including character traits it was physically impossible to have changed.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 04:52 PM
2

To be fair, for a long time HPV wasn't publicly viewed as harmful for men. The main developmental cause for the vaccine was to bring down rates of cervical cancer. However, it is excellent news that some countries have begun offering it irrespective of gender alongside the other childhood vaccines, e.g. in the UK, (generally given aged 12/13) due to the increased awareness of it having the ability to cause cancer in both men and women. The big issue now is getting it additionally given to men be…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 03:57 PM
5

Serious question: Do you engage in homosexual activity? Currently the only effective testing that men can have, outside of visual confirmation via physical symptoms (e.g. genital warts), is using anal PAP tests - something only useful for gay (or bisexual) men, not straight men. If you do, you will likely have to inform your healthcare provider of this (if you have public healthcare) in order to be added to the 'at risk' list and subsequently offered testing.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 11:04 AM
2

Lets ask the actual Palestinians, shall we. "Palestine and Jordan are one..." - King Abdullah (of Jordan) in 1948.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 07:43 AM
60

If HR persistently ignore you, raise a formal complaint with Acas. You have three months (minus a day) from the date of your complaint to begin 'early conciliation.' At the end of this you and your employer will be issued either a COT3 agreement, a legal agreement that you and your employer have to stick to, or a 'early conciliation certificate.' You require this certificate to take further action with an employment tribunal.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:34 AM
0

Youre kinda forgetting the 1937 world flight was quite literally suppose to be a gendered achievement, literally the only reason its important is because it broke the social norms - the only thing seperating it from Wiley Hardeman Post's (the first man to do it) was that she was a woman. Ultimately though Fred gets buried by the event because at the end of the day its he who fucked up. The flight leg they went missing on (Hawaii to Howland Island) was the only part of the trip he was originally …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:06 PM
4

Tbf, most people can't even name the aircraft Amelia used. They only can name her as her achievements are socially important. Fred, on the other hand, while he did chart quite a few of Pan Am's Pacific routes didn't do anything socially important.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:44 AM
-3

Be interesting to know what you're referring to as an illicit substance.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 02:48 PM
39

The NLM have published quite a few things on it, here's the top 15 countries it occurs in: State of Bolivia (DHS 2008), the Central African Republic (MICS 2010), Comoros (DHS 2012), Cuba (MICS 2014), Guatemala (DHS 2015), Guyana (MICS 2014), Honduras (DHS 2011–2012), Lao People’s Democratic Republic (MICS 2011–2012), Madagascar (Enquête Nationale sur le Suivi des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement à Madagascar (2013)), the Marshall Islands (DHS 2007), Mozambique (DHS 2011), Nauru (DHS…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:50 AM
3

No, it's perfectly reasonable to think that way as they've been failing the male voter base for several decades now. The difference this time is the far right parties are willing to make the appeals and the conservatives are looking to lose key demographics to labour. As a result reigning in their public views on certain things is the only way they can retain a majority in the next election.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 06:34 PM
1

Upcoming general election. By conducting studies like this the government can better appeal to demographics, even in the short term, in order to attempt and secure votes.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 05:44 PM
3

Makeup? You mean the stuff that the earliest documented uses of are on Egyptian men? Which gained popularity over 8000 years ago in which economic factors divided use not gender? The stuff that only became associated with women in the mid 1800s after the industrial revolution?
/r/MensRights13/01/24 02:51 AM
-1

It's a joke script appealing to the Femdom crowd... for reference look at the first part of the clips she filmed with the guy: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CiQBGRWrwtJ/?igshid=N2ViNmM2MDRjNw==
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/23 03:02 PM
79

Well, unless you're in N.America mens mental health month is November. Plus pride has been recognised since the '70s while mental health awareness only since the early 90s.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 06:57 AM
8

As you are aware my comment is a direct response to your incorrect statement of "I get the anger we feel but a guy on a bad date could end up with herpes: a woman could end up dead." Not of life in general - doesn't require advanced understanding of English to realise that mate. Your statement remains misandristic.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:46 PM
7

Just because it's less common doesn't mean men aren't at risk of being murdered. Stop with misandristic generalisations.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:20 PM
2

You have been banned from participating in r/[insert feminist subreddit]
/r/MensRights28/12/22 11:24 AM
1

only if you also got bottom surgery
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:48 PM
2

Not bad, more pointless. That video doesn't actually mean anything as consent can be withdrawn at any point.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:48 AM
1

literally. The fact so many people here don't get this is the reason why we're chucked in with the incels.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:47 AM
2

yeah no. No still means no regardless of if your married.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:46 AM
2

That's the neat part, you don't. A false accusation is an immediate loss for you unless you can prove that either you didn't have sex or that she had continued consent - something you'll probably never be able to do.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:43 AM
1

because the main problem is this video would still be pointless. Consent can be withdrew at any time therefore making any video prior to that useless. He'd have to get a video after the act for it to have any worth.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:36 AM
4

It just comes under the generic sexual assault charges which theoretically can carry the same sentence as a rape charge but in reality you'll get let than 10 and be out within 5.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:11 PM
2

I most probably wouldn't notice tbh
/r/MensRights24/08/22 04:56 PM
11

crawl back to whatever sexual abuse supporting subreddit you're from.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 12:05 PM
1

Imma hope that last line is satire because otherwise we've found the reason she called you an incel
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:17 PM
1

This article is from 2014, we really should be using newer information.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:11 PM
0

are they though. or are they simply realising they can't be admitting it around the men they're interested in because otherwise they'll be ignored.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:30 PM
1

was 3 years away 20 years ago so don't get your hopes up. also the side effects list will be pretty long.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:30 PM
1

Not really. Look at their policies. You're confusing the auth-lib (up-down) axis with the left-right economic axis. Economically the nazis where pretty centralist bringing in economic calming measures, stabilising pay, national schemes for car ownership etc.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:48 PM
3

I'd like to point out last time it was rejected the Gov response was: "Sexual violence against men is treated just as seriously by the law and forcing a man to have penetrative sex, for example, (under section 4(4) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003) carries the same maximum sentence as rape – life in prison." Said section directly uses male gendered language to address the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:38 PM
4

*4th under this phrasing... its the 10th if we look at alternative phrasing since 2015 and something like the 20th if we go looking all the way back to 2003.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:14 PM
1

here we go for a 20th time...
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:03 PM
1

ty
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 10:25 AM
2

is this an in total or a per 100,000 people stat
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 10:06 AM
-2

there's more recent occerences, no need to repost stuff from 2016.
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 08:58 PM
2

Feminism has always been anti-male regardless of the wave. You just need to read some of the Suffragettes literature to understand that they where just as radical as modern feminists - they just didn't outwardly express it as much as they knew they couldn't get away with it without them being physically shut down.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 12:24 AM
1

The Red Pill
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/21 01:05 PM
1

True, however that depends on if you consider the Suffragettes as feminists. As they committed a good few hundred acts of terrorism.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/21 01:05 PM
1

Their second rule mate, all comments must be made from a feminist perspective. They're a echo chamber
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/21 12:52 PM
0

Their second rule is essentially all comments must be written by a feminist. What did you expect?
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 06:07 PM
31

This is due to intellectual conformity. If you look at the iq charts women tend to fit the average expected distribution line - they have variation but the overwhelming majority are just average. Men on the other hand have more diversity meaning you will find more men at both extremes of intelligence. Its not that the average girl is smarter, its just that the average girl is more likely to be average than the boy.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:30 AM
2

Probably their first rule which is all top level comments must be made by feminists
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/21 11:02 PM
1

Go back to fds
/r/MGTOW229/07/21 01:51 PM
5

Simply having the name Lilith is the giveaway.
/r/MGTOW24/07/21 12:36 AM
1

Needs a few plants and better routing of that cable
/r/MGTOW10/07/21 07:09 PM
1

Peer-to-peer exchanges and meet ups. More risk as you're dealing with other people that can run away with your money but it is untraceable to you as a person if you're smart about it.
/r/MGTOW10/07/21 01:18 PM
1

Peer-to-peer exchanges and meet ups. More risk as you're dealing with other people that can run away with your money but it is untraceable to you as a person if you're smart about it.
/r/MGTOW10/07/21 01:18 PM
3

cough https://marissasbooks.com/products/toxic-women Pretty sure you can still buy it
/r/MGTOW207/06/21 03:46 PM
2

https://marissasbooks.com/products/toxic-women Seems to be the book
/r/MGTOW207/06/21 03:44 PM
2

No, the satire one is r/femaledatingstrategypros
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/21 08:50 AM
6

Either a Wizard or a liar
/r/MGTOW01/06/21 09:59 PM
7

You've misread. Each percentage is the percentage of that particular reason not of suicide overall.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 09:56 PM
9

Lowballing on the 50% figure
/r/MGTOW230/05/21 09:47 PM
2

"InTeRnAlIsEd MiSoGYnY"
/r/MGTOW28/05/21 02:23 PM
3

Since when was GOT based on real events?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/21 10:07 AM
3

Nowhere do they mention being married or being forced to build there. Looks to me like they know space efficiency.
/r/MGTOW26/05/21 06:54 AM
7

Pretty sure it's the number of people that get married in a year - which is why it fluctuates so variably
/r/MGTOW24/05/21 01:43 PM
2

https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/articles/2020-04-29/us-marriage-rate-drops-to-record-low
/r/MGTOW24/05/21 01:35 PM
2

So if two people you know both accuse you of rape you're automatically a rapist? Well ok.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 12:16 PM
1

They mostly aren't. This, like many others, isn't a true reflection of the occult scene but more of a lifestyle aesthetic which has taken inspiration from it. Kinda like how Christianity repurposed pagan festivals they've doing the same.
/r/MGTOW20/05/21 07:38 AM
1

EverQuest, Elite Dangerous, occasionally a bit of WoW
/r/MGTOW19/05/21 12:38 PM
3

o7 fellow commander
/r/MGTOW19/05/21 12:36 PM
2

I'm holding basically the same as you Just instead of Doge and REEF I've got BTT and TRX
/r/MGTOW214/05/21 02:02 PM
5

I'd rather my head be cracked open then take people like this seriously
/r/MGTOW13/05/21 09:38 PM
1

Good, finally an escape from religious fanatics
/r/MGTOW213/05/21 07:26 AM
1

Bold of you to assume I care about death
/r/MGTOW213/05/21 07:23 AM
1

Mate, the sooner you realise God is just as bad as Satan the better. You are deluded by blind faith, something just as bad as the Rad Left.
/r/MGTOW213/05/21 07:21 AM
0

Yeah, no. That's nonsense.
/r/MGTOW211/05/21 01:09 PM
0

If you're in it for the long haul, BTT and XLM are quite interesting and have great practical application
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 02:18 PM
1

Good ole Solipsism
/r/MGTOW08/05/21 09:17 PM
9

That 'old saying' includes a double negative. What it's really saying is "Broke niggas do deserve pussy." Their lack of English proficiency is unsurprising.
/r/MGTOW06/05/21 10:30 PM
2

Driver by choice or compulsory?
/r/MGTOW30/04/21 03:51 PM
2

Kinda harsh on the pigeons comparing them to feminists
/r/MGTOW28/04/21 01:32 PM
7

Perfect company name...
/r/MGTOW26/04/21 11:49 AM
1

laughs in asexuality But, seriously, sex is great and all but is something you can quite easily live without.
/r/MGTOW26/04/21 11:47 AM
2

No, she posed a theoretical situation where the genders are reversed. Not that it'd work as society would have collapsed.
/r/MGTOW16/04/21 12:59 AM
60

Dominance; Asserted
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 04:39 PM
3

That ain't a friend, that's a liability.
/r/MGTOW15/04/21 11:21 AM
0

This isn't exactly MGTOW related...
/r/MGTOW08/04/21 04:27 PM
1

Nazis said the exact same thing about the Nazi party...
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/21 03:30 PM
5

Misogyny is towards women. You mean misandry.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:21 AM
8

Judges can and will overrule them.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 01:00 PM
4

Quite common for reddit to ban people that comment and post here
/r/MGTOW01/04/21 08:16 PM
2

This is GYOW not Go The Way that makes a generic reddit user happy.
/r/MGTOW01/04/21 08:11 PM
23

'No, Officer, I didn't kill him; I simply reversed his life...'
/r/MensRights26/03/21 11:56 AM
1

Thats considered assault by penetration, not rape.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/21 01:45 PM
5

They'll say this then follow up with 'The Patriarchy'. But, uh, for this to be true you're admitting the matriarchy exists...
/r/MensRights19/03/21 05:36 PM
2

Yeah, it's desynced
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 01:27 PM
1

Alas, it's the same on every other social platform...
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/21 01:25 PM
3

What patriarchy?
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:43 AM
10

It's always been about revenge
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/21 07:07 PM
3

This will be the 9th time we've attempted to change the law. Each time it gets rejected. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions?q=male+rape
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:31 PM
10

Some of them have basically just recreated prostitution
/r/MensRights09/03/21 12:08 PM
2

Imagine using a chromium based browser with Google set as the default search engine... Your homepage doesn't matter you're still supporting Google.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:29 AM
1

I mean, there is a gap. One caused by the average man saving £3300 a year into pensions vs women at £2200. They just won't tell you that.
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/21 01:03 AM
4

laughs in heavily outdated netscape
/r/MGTOW09/03/21 12:52 AM
2

Yep, I was just going a brief summary but thanks for the addition.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 12:15 AM
4

If you're in England: 1265: less than 5% of men could vote along with <1% of women 1689: again less than 10% of men could vote with around 1% of women 1832: around 14% of men could vote, women lost the right to vote entirely. 1867: Up to 30% of men could vote, giving the working class the right to vote for the first time in the UK. 1885: Up to 56% of men got to vote. 1918: finally 100% of men could vote as well as women regaining the right to vote with 67% of women getting the vote (this is as t…
/r/MensRights08/03/21 11:22 PM
3

Blink twice of you need help
/r/MensRights08/03/21 10:45 PM
14

You are not a snowflake - you're a victim, emotion is not necessarily weakness. You're a perfect example of how under-represented and unsupported men actually are when it comes to abuse. Honesty, I'd be pissed if I where you. This is why men's rights must be argued and defended.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 10:27 PM
1

Are you trying to argue that something observable under a microscope is not real? If so, then you are more blue pill then you think you are. Covid is very real. The consequences of Covid are very real. And due to the world currently exiting a micro-ice age viruses such as this will become more common; so expect a lot more vaccines and viruses appearing. As for me, I've already taken the vaccine. I have no reason to fear it as I understand the science behind it. Vaccines are not about take it and…
/r/MGTOW04/03/21 01:55 PM
1

God, the amount of anti-vaccers in this sub. There is no need to lie - just tell them the truth, show them the stats around healthy younger people. It is important that you do your DD around the subject and come to a conclusion of your own accord. Afterall, it's GYOW not do what others try to make you. Personally I would recommend getting the vaccine. This is as while the virus itself may be no worse than the flu, it has the potential to be worse - there's a reason the flu doesn't overwhelm our …
/r/MGTOW04/03/21 08:57 AM
43

Mostly women and sjws coming from feminist subs who are trying to get this sub banned/restricted by posting rubbish which they then report.
/r/MGTOW203/03/21 11:23 PM
1

People have forgotten it was men that originally designed makeup for men.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 09:22 AM
48

"To ensure gender equality it is important in many cases that women and men are treated equally. But they should not necessarily be treated equally in all situations." Tells you everything you need to know about feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/21 09:00 AM
5

This isn't hate, this is pointing out the hypocrisy in female behaviour
/r/MGTOW227/02/21 12:35 PM
11

Found the feminist
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/21 02:02 PM
7

Snapchat just isn't the type of place to have a nice chat with new people tbh. It's designed for short daily interaction or the occasional 'private' self deleting message. Like most media it is designed for women first, as usual were just an afterthought. It's more an issue on Instagram and Twitter where men are actively discriminated against with a moderation team that tends to delete anything pro-male. But what can we expect? 2/3rds of twitters 10% of users that post 80% of stuff are female an…
/r/MensRights20/02/21 05:18 PM
11

Correct - you can find them on LinkedIn.
/r/MGTOW20/02/21 03:34 PM
4

Depends on your definition of male. A trans male will never biological be male - they can simply only ever appear to be male. So if you are a physicalist, then no. They shouldn't. If you believe that what makes someone a man is a mindset and that gender is some non-physical social construct then yes. Afterall if someone identifies as a man then they would be a man. MRM isn't about trying to 'one-up' feminism. It's about actually attaining equality by fixing the true issues in society rather than…
/r/MensRights20/02/21 02:22 AM
63

Hey, at least the global cat population is going to start booming! 🐈
/r/MGTOW20/02/21 01:16 AM
5

Because the data is skewed. More men die as more men are exposed. If you look, the majority of workers that couldn't work from home are male. As such more men are at risk of catching the virus. As more men get it, more men will die - statistics 101. Although you are right. Men should be a higher priority as we are more likely to be working in an industry which exposes us but, alas, feminists are the most vocal group and unfortunately our governments are two shallow to stand up for men.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 12:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter