TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ZimbaZumba Archive

View 179 posts and 4,723 comments by ZimbaZumba on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
753

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:59 PM
663

ZimbaZumba/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/20 04:19 AM
639

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:20 PM
428

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/08/19 07:41 PM
181

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:47 PM
164

Activism/SupportZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:08 AM
163

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights22/01/13 08:31 PM
152

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:33 PM
146

IntactivismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/11/21 11:59 PM
134

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:55 PM
128

ProgressZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/03/21 02:58 AM
123

False AccusationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:28 PM
118

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/09/19 02:24 AM
117

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:45 PM
104

ZimbaZumba/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/16 04:56 PM
96

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:39 AM
96

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:21 AM
88

ZimbaZumba/r/PussyPass02/05/14 01:36 AM
88

NewsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:56 AM
75

ZimbaZumba/r/PussyPass22/07/14 10:29 AM
74

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:06 AM
66

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:12 PM
64

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:41 PM
63

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:54 PM
61

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:24 PM
60

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:55 PM
59

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights08/02/16 02:37 PM
58

NewsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:36 PM
56

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights13/06/19 08:59 PM
55

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:55 PM
53

QualityZimbaZumba/r/PussyPass01/11/14 03:34 AM
53

Legal RightsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:25 PM
52

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:56 PM
51

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:55 PM
50

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:32 AM
50

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights30/12/20 01:35 AM
50

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:03 PM
50

Legal RightsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/09/20 02:13 AM
49

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:48 PM
47

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:49 PM
43

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:57 PM
42

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:06 PM
40

OpinionZimbaZumba/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:46 PM
39

OutrageZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:09 AM
37

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:43 PM
37

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:44 PM
36

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights15/01/16 10:32 PM
35

Raising AwarenessZimbaZumba/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:37 PM
35

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:43 PM
34

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:23 AM
34

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:07 AM
33

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:23 PM
32

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:24 PM
32

Raising AwarenessZimbaZumba/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:07 AM
31

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights16/06/13 07:14 PM
31

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:52 PM
31

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/04/20 06:35 AM
31

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:23 AM
30

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:38 AM
29

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:27 PM
29

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:21 AM
28

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:40 PM
26

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:35 PM
25

IntactivismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights26/06/20 09:21 PM
25

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights03/08/20 01:24 AM
24

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:17 AM
23

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:19 PM
23

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights09/02/16 06:25 PM
22

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:26 PM
21

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/03/16 10:43 PM
21

FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/06/20 06:11 PM
21

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights22/12/13 02:01 AM
20

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:47 AM
20

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:35 AM
20

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:20 AM
20

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/06/12 04:13 PM
20

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:14 AM
19

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:36 PM
19

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:57 PM
19

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:37 PM
19

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:06 PM
19

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:41 AM
19

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:20 PM
19

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/12/18 06:05 AM
18

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:04 PM
17

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:06 PM
16

FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:25 PM
16

re: FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:52 PM
16

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:40 PM
15

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:20 PM
15

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/04/17 12:19 AM
15

Legal RightsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:19 PM
15

False AccusationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/05/15 10:22 AM
15

FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:00 PM
14

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:03 PM
14

FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:23 PM
14

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:15 AM
14

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/06/21 12:30 AM
13

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:09 PM
13

Activism/SupportZimbaZumba/r/MensRights16/04/19 08:55 PM
13

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:32 PM
12

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:12 PM
12

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:11 PM
12

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:44 AM
11

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:17 AM
11

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:10 AM
11

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights03/12/17 09:21 PM
11

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:38 PM
11

False AccusationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:30 AM
11

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:09 AM
10

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:34 PM
10

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:58 PM
10

DiscriminationZimbaZumba/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:32 PM
10

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:27 PM
10

Men's Rights NewsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:39 PM
10

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:28 PM
10

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:10 AM
9

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:38 AM
9

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:42 AM
9

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:12 AM
9

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:05 PM
9

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:12 AM
8

Edu./Occu.ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:17 PM
8

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:17 AM
8

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:25 PM
8

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:48 PM
8

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/05/12 04:03 AM
8

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:58 PM
7

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:32 AM
7

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights25/05/12 04:51 PM
6

ZimbaZumba/r/PussyPass03/05/15 10:30 AM
6

FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:57 AM
6

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:44 PM
6

Reverse GendersZimbaZumba/r/MensRights22/07/14 03:21 PM
6

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:54 AM
6

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:18 PM
6

Raising AwarenessZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:52 PM
5

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:23 PM
5

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights21/10/13 04:06 PM
5

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:37 AM
5

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights11/09/16 07:25 PM
4

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:55 AM
4

re: FeminismZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:07 AM
4

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:28 PM
4

Activism/SupportZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:04 AM
4

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights16/07/12 12:32 PM
4

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/07/17 02:19 PM
3

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:15 AM
3

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:09 PM
3

OpinionZimbaZumba/r/MensRights21/03/15 08:05 PM
3

SatireZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:53 PM
3

Legal RightsZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/05/15 10:24 PM
3

OutrageZimbaZumba/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:03 PM
3

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights24/07/13 03:30 AM
3

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights28/02/16 06:37 AM
3

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:29 AM
2

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:18 PM
2

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights27/12/12 05:51 AM
2

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:45 PM
2

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights15/02/14 06:45 PM
2

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:46 AM
2

Blogs/VideoZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/11/14 04:02 AM
1

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights15/12/13 02:21 AM
1

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:59 AM
1

GeneralZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:36 PM
1

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:20 AM
1

CrosspostZimbaZumba/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:00 PM
1

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:20 AM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/05/17 04:49 PM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:21 PM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights07/12/14 04:20 PM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:48 PM
0

Social IssuesZimbaZumba/r/MensRights19/06/16 01:30 PM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights11/05/14 02:29 PM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:35 AM
0

Blogs/VideoZimbaZumba/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:33 AM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:02 PM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:59 AM
0

ZimbaZumba/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:12 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,723 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I bet she dumped him. Beta men are very unattractive.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:33 PM
2

There are so many levels of absurdity and awfulness in this initiative that I do not know where to begin.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 04:54 AM
2

What does 'Misogyny' even mean these days? Its dictionary definition is the hatred of women.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:43 PM
10

The arguments against this are endless. There are strong occupation preferences based on gender; the data on this is overwhelming. Enforcing equality of outcome will result in the hiring of less able people and a stigma around those preferentially hired. This thinking models humans as cows in a feedlot and completely ignores the complexity of the human condition. Simplistic, back-of-an-envelope theories about social organisation result in disaster; Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot are all a testament to …
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:30 PM
1

"Whether someone is a 'victim' is a conclusion to be reached at the end of a fair process, not an assumption to be made at the beginning," wrote Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the 2016 case Doe v. Brandeis University. "If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision." Wise words worth not…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:52 PM
10

Whenever an allegation of rape or sexual assault comes to us, our starting point is to believe the person making that claim. I thought the police had been told to stop doing this. The police statements suggest that are still bowing down to the ideologues.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:02 PM
3

Notably the majority began their reasons with statements about the lowconviction rates in sexual assault crimes and statistics showing that itis severely under-reported. With numbers of convictions in mind, themajority declared in para 2: “More needs to be done.” WTF This is the Supreme Court!
/r/MensRights27/07/22 02:10 PM
1

Lol, that was 9 years. Despite the GMP being an arm of the feminist movement for beta males, the discussion is actually fairly good.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 03:46 PM
1

The Canadian legislation is based on the so-called Scandinavian Model. In essence, it prosecutes the Johns but not the prostitutes. It is up for legal review, and many people are unhappy with it.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:26 PM
1

It is a box standard article about the injustices of the system.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 08:16 PM
1

That is a very written and thorough article.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 05:49 PM
1

Philip Davies is one of the very few MPs who has the courage to speak the truth. Amazing guy.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 05:37 PM
6

The Guardian is a tabloid; for the pseudo-intellectual left. They just use longer words.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 07:46 PM
1

"When Times Are Good, the Gender Gap Grows" it could also be "When the Gender Gap Grows, Times are Good"
/r/MensRights05/02/22 08:13 PM
2

The big lie works, especially when it plays into an SJW narrative. Once the lie gains some traction, adding more and more to it increases its credibility. Breaking the lie's bubble is really difficult. I witnessed the big lie used at work and was blown away at how effective it was.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 05:57 PM
10

They are turning on themselves now. If you strip away the dogma and loaded language, then what she is saying is largely correct. She is highlighting some of the contradictions and inconsistencies that riddle feminism. I look forward to the ensuing carnage as the movement tears itself apart.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 03:35 PM
1

Here they are:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faSw5aQrGiI Take some Gravol first.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 05:10 AM
7

She was arrested for posters and stickers inferring anti-Trans opinions. They never mentioned "Trans" once. The arrest is absurd, odious and a sign that wokeness has spiralled dangerously out of control. The bubble will burst in a few years.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:47 PM
3

Brilliant quote.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 01:46 PM
3

"Male Gaze" is just another made-up phrase in the feminist lexicon to demonise a perfectly natural and human phenomenon to keep their cause ticking over. It is not worthy of any further analysis.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:11 PM
1

The two guys in hats video is really old, they were doing it just to get a rise out of people for a video. Here they are:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBoT9mmtTO8
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:28 AM
1

Addressing men’s violence against women and children Women's violence against men and children will not be addressed? The whole draft reads like a Mafia demand for protection money.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:38 AM
1

This is boneheaded on so many different levels Equal representation in the boardrooms would be a consequence of their perfect world. Forcing equal representation does not create the world they want, it just creates more women in the boardroom. Painting stripes on my dog does not make him a tiger, This smells of elitist feminism creating jobs for the privileged girls. Their argument is:- look after us top dogs and the world will improve for you working-class gals, ie a load of bollocks. So they c…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 05:13 PM
3

I do not think this is a serious article. It is just clickbait to get a reaction. Don't react to it.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 08:18 AM
2

Child abuse and fatalities are completely off the map politically. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:11 PM
1

Feminist speakers commonly start a list of 'Myths', that often do not exist, and then proceed to create their own myths. It is a standard format that people dare not challenge.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 06:00 PM
1

Correct, whilst indulging in the same thing being complained about.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 02:48 PM
1

His conclusions are as meaningful as pointing out there is a larger IQ gap than gender gap. Playing around with categories to get the message you want is statistics from the gutter. It is called p-hacking. Perhaps he would like to do a similar regional analysis on the 'pay gap'? The most significant variable is probably the number of books in the house.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 08:34 AM
2

If a male-only draft was used there would be mayhem. Men in the US will not tolerate that level of discrimination. Instituting a draft is tough enough as it is. They have not considered this.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:39 PM
9

Protesting works.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:15 PM
4

I understand, if the commentary goes outside of Reddit's rules then sure a ban is appropriate. I personally do not think any views should be banned, however noxious, but then I do not make the rules for Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 05:51 PM
14

You can say anything you want here and will not get banned, so long as it is within Reddit's rules. You may have people disagree with you, which is quite different. So go ahead and use that voice as much as you wish. (I probably have you beat for the number of social justice subs I am banned from :-)
/r/MensRights01/01/22 05:40 PM
3

This is also an interesting and disturbing video:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM7QVv8c1BI
/r/MensRights01/01/22 04:35 PM
1

Yet they did not flex a single muscle of their massive social power, such as their ability to influence the media and organise protests.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:33 PM
1

Yet you decide to whine yourself. You lack an understanding of how grassroots groups form.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:15 PM
3

The SCOTUS case has to go right back to the beginning as an entirely new case; it will take years. The question I ask is, where was the might of the feminist lobby in all of this?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:11 PM
1

If only the world were that simple; I think you are overly idealistic.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:48 AM
0

The first job is to reclaim the meaning of the word 'Rape', which used to mean to violently take away. Its meaning has changed drastically over the last 40 years.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:33 AM
1

At the base of all of this is the development of language to describe DV in a particular way and public conditioning to view DV in that way. There is the +ve feedback loop between these two mechanisms; hence the present public hysteria.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:15 AM
95

Will not be counted in the intimate partner homicide statistics.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:09 AM
1

Charlatan and Snake Oil Salesman. A monster.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:08 AM
1

She is brilliant and a thorn in the side of dogmatic feminists.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:55 PM
6

Well researched article.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:50 PM
5

This is a really good article. This study shows male suicide victims actually do in fact seek help link.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:29 PM
5

Ellen Pence who was the main architect of the model wrote Link:- "By determining that the need or desire for power was the motivating force behind battering, we created a conceptual framework that, in fact, did not fit the lived experience of many of the men and women we were working with. The DAIP staff [...] remained undaunted by the difference in our theory and the actual experiences of those we were working with [...] It was the cases themselves that created the chink in each of our theoreti…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 03:19 PM
5

They teach them internally consistent theories with no connection to reality.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:50 PM
2

They are divisive words designed to keep activists relevant. They are running out of things to protest about. Call people out when they use them and they will eventually disappear. People know they are fake and vile invented words.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:03 PM
6

Urtula died on May 20, 2019, just hours before his college graduation. You was tracking his phone that morning and was present at the time of his death. Urtula's family was in town for his graduation. She was present when he killed himself. She should be in jail.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 07:38 AM
1

Are there any news reports of this?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 03:11 PM
1

I would not respond; her reply speaks for itself.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 06:13 PM
2

ty :-)
/r/MensRights13/12/21 12:56 AM
3

Wring to other justice spokesmen is an excellent idea. Your letter contains some excellent points that can apply to other situations. Posting it here might be useful, ask the Mods.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 12:06 AM
4

Complaining does ultimately work but it can take time. If there are no complaints they will simply get worse. Your letter is extremely well written. The Maori angle is important as their comments disproportionately affect Maori men. Other avenues include MPs and the media, they like to be fed arguments. Your Minister of Justice looks like a loser and is advised by that crazy, rad fem lesbian. But the same principle as above applies. Great work!
/r/MensRights12/12/21 10:34 PM
11

Demonising a group defined by an inherent characteristic, well-done NZHRC. I am sure this goes against the mandate they are paid to fulfil. A well-written complaint based on their mandate should be made. It may not have an immediate effect but the effects of complaints build up over time. If people do not complain then nothing will happen. Complaining to MP's is also very effective. Their statutory responsibilities are HERE. Amongst them are:- Advocate and promote respect for, and an understandi…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:16 PM
13

It will be put down to "Toxic Masculinity".
/r/MensRights12/12/21 02:16 PM
1

2X is a swirling mass of neurotic women rejoicing in their victimhood, together with a few beta male white knights. They remind me of this LINK. I note with some pride I am banned from there, for reasons unknown.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 01:47 PM
5

Where are the protests by feminists and the ACLU?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 12:54 PM
4

Holy mother of God!
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:36 PM
8

That is so sad.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 02:20 AM
22

The Supreme Court case will therefore proceed.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 11:21 PM
2

I think you are exactly correct and people need to read Frankl. The world used to be a simpler place and finding meaning was an easier task. Young people, in particular, are looking for meaning and direction, any one of these theories will fulfil that need but at a cost. Sadly, I feel others are gaining meaning in their lives by promoting these ideas to young people, with little regard to the potential wide-ranging damage.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:50 AM
1

You have put forward an Evolutionary Psychology (EP) like theory and then drawn conclusions from it. EP theories are attractive and good at explaining fundamental mechanisms but will break down if you extend them too far. I think your theory contains some over simplifications of history and does not account for some very probable feedback mechanisms. Going from the dawn of time to a modern and complex effect is a big leap even for an EP theory. You have also re-introduced the nebulous, if not im…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:52 AM
2

You are talking about social organisation, not masculinity. Social organisation is a result of an enormous number of factors, many of which are unknown to us. Social norms will evolve as the realities of our world change. Attempting to change them through undue pressure is Utopian and rarely productive; social norms are agreed upon not imposed. As a society we value freedom of choice.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:49 AM
5

ROTFL. I am ashamed to say I am aware of that sad fact. There is very little in this world I have not checked out.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:13 PM
2

I don't think the concept of masculinity is sufficiently definable to be of any great use. I think it is dangerous. There is a greater variation of personality traits within men as a group than there is between the average man and average woman. The 'average' man and women are remarkably similar. An average statistic from a large population with a large variance is mostly useless; very few individuals will be close to that average person. Men will be what men will be, based on self-determination…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:46 PM
7

Toxic Masculinity This assumes there is a concept called masculinity, in particular a toxic variety. Thus there must be a 'good' variety. Now we can define what being a 'real' or 'good' man is. Don't let the manipulators of language create an imaginary concept through stealth, and then start defining what men should be. Simply reject the concept of 'toxic masculinity' outright. Don't even debate it.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:09 PM
15

I thought women could have penises.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:00 PM
2

I think you would benefit from a course in elementary probability theory. edit: I notice you are a troll, I am a bit slow today. Trolls rarely last very long around here.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 05:59 PM
3

UBC hired retired B.C. judge Mary Ellen Boyd to investigate, and she found in April, 2016, that on a balance of probabilities he did not commit sexual assault or assault. She could not even prove her case using a balance of probabilities, ie 51 to 49.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 05:50 PM
5

He lost his job because he slept with his student. In many universities, this is not an offence and in those where it is, you'd be naive to think it is not going on. Professors and students are human, and there are usually informal ways of dealing with it. They fired him because he slept with a student AND had the label rapist. He is suing the attention-seeking s**t and her lynch mob for calling him a rapist. I hope he nails their arses to the wall.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 05:24 PM
1

He probably thinks the 13 weeks is worth every week for the revenge.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 04:46 PM
61

The only way to change this is by making a fuss and complaining. Wherever you are, there are bodies to make your feelings known to. A social experiment put up on YouTube is also a good move.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 07:25 PM
9

It will, but it will still bring the issue into people consciousness.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:59 PM
10

Signed and confirmed.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:58 PM
1

She goes on the "The Jonathan Ross Show" and finds the conversation offensive? ROTFL.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:20 PM
1

Reposte: Your argument is pure speculation for which you have no evidence. You cannot see into the workings of my mind.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:14 PM
2

Label, smear and false flag is the way they deal with groups at odds with them.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:16 PM
3

2X has turned into an excuse to complain abut men.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:31 AM
2

The article read like I had come in half way through a conversation. The introduction needed to bring readers up up to speed. I am not sure what I gained from reading it. For the record Briffaults Law is (I had to look it up) :- The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place The implication is that once a female ceases to get what she wants, or has obtained what s…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:04 PM
5

Your stated philosophy consists of a torrents of points, each of which contains hidden assumptions that would also have to be addressed. Adding the fact that people here would disagree with virtually everything you have said, the best you can really expect is commentary and opinion. Which is what you got.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 06:32 AM
6

Perhaps you need to re-read some of your own comments before playing the victim. That is the best my double digit IQ can muster. ;-)
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:53 AM
5

And you accuse me of projection? As I said, your engagement here may be the start of a life changing journey. :-)
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:17 AM
5

In this case a sample of one is more than sufficient to reach a conclusion. I think you are over estimating the diversity of thought you are engaging in. (I am puzzled as to how you can project an unknown deficiency onto someone else)
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:08 AM
13

Your world view is so jaundiced and ill informed that you must live a very bitter life. If you learned any of the above in an educational institution, then you should ask for your money back, you have been badly educated. You flout the phrases "critical thinking skills" and "agreed upon history" yet seem devoid of knowledge of both. You clearly need to talk to more people with contrary ideas, this is an important part of forming healthy opinions and world views, as is reading more widely. Existi…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:37 AM
6

curly worded, verbal gymnastics This obviously stuck in your craw because of its accuracy. If you are going to come in here and try to throw your imaginary intellectual weight around, then I suggest you size up your adversaries a little more accurately next time. Dogma and bad manners don't hack it around here. Try harder.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:49 AM
5

Judging by the boneheadness of this and your other comments, I have a greater understanding of the meaning of this phrase than you do.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:37 AM
50

The curly worded, verbal gymnastics that people go through to defend this phrase sound like something out of an SNL or Monty Python skit. The phrase is vile, especially coming from those who use it.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:45 PM
2

Good post to share. People will listen if approached reasonably.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 06:52 PM
15

When an activity involves dogmatism, high paying jobs, status and junkets to foreign countries - then a whole system of WTF will evolve. Career paths, raison d'etres, higher purposes and self righteousness experts will pollute the whole system. Normalisation is the name of the game. This is firstly done by referring to important sounding organisations and agreements, which in turn will produce more of the same. A whole facade of common sense 'truths' with foundations of sand will evolve. Normali…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 04:52 PM
1

Plain mean spirited, this is the UN for gods sake.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:47 PM
2

Good grief.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:59 PM
1

The core of the problem is that the primary purpose of our secondary education system is to train obedience, conformity and maintain class structure. They were quite open about this when they designed it in the early 20th century, Link. Boys, in particular, do not react well to obedience and conformity. These aims are so deeply embedded into the whole system that we have become unaware of them. Everything from the curriculum; classroom structure; lessons; examinations; daily routine; school hier…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 07:55 AM
8

From the comments section:- It's so brave and inspiring that these boys broke the glass ceiling of female dominated netball in Australia. Truly empowering. These women are just sexists who can't stand to see men succeed where they once dominated.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 02:47 PM
1

The Stonewall Project maintains a "Workplace Equality Index" and also costs money to interact with - it is little more than a shakedown and a protection money racket. There 2hr digital workshops are £1150 ($1,542). God knows what is to join their "Diversity Champions" program.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 05:57 PM
6

Good article. Memorable sentences:- ‘the binary thinking of belligerent neofeminism’. ​ And if you’re a victim, all the free-floating guilt — about privilege, about the planet, about parenting — simply disappears.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 04:01 PM
1

That is the only way to deal with this type of shit.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 01:25 PM
1

From another report:- Miss White, a teacher at the primary school, wrote on Twitter : "P6 have been learning about the importance of breaking down gender stereotypes. This is an elementary school up to age 11. WTF are they doing?!
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:05 AM
8

The student who posted his picture should also be sued.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:57 AM
1

"men's rights activists" have wrongly blamed these issues on feminism Untrue, just one of your flawed axioms. The rest of the argument is badly constructed and not supported by evidence. Lousy attempt at trolling.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 12:53 AM
2

Canada's feminist icons the "Famous Five)" were all either eugenicists or the vilest of racists.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 11:45 PM
1

“It was a very sad, sort of tough thing to have to do, because there’s people on that list who were truly, amazingly deserving,” Fricker said. "But the honest truth is that they will get nominated again and they will become fellows. There’s no question there. It will just be a fairer process.” There something odious and callous about this statement.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 11:00 PM
7

Isn't the basic argument of feminism that the genders should be equal? The MRM is a Human Rights movement - I guess you will be joining us then?
/r/MensRights31/10/21 09:50 PM
11

This depends on the severity of the groping, intent, the ages involved, background story and a whole heap of other contextual information. The offense of groping can vary from serious sexual assault to an awkward teenage mistake. Broad brush punishments are usually either too severe or too light. There is, however, a degree of flexibility in the legal system. Compounding factors are the misuse of the sexual offenders register and the often lack of flexibility in the hands of the school. It shoul…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:06 PM
2

Looking at Australia from the outside leaves the rest of the world scratching their heads. Claiming gender inequality is the primary cause of domestic violence, has no basis in fact and fails any common sense test. Senator Leyonhjelm exposed this Kafkaesque situation at a Senate committee.LINK. I see the following mechanisms at play here:- If it's political suicide to criticise an ideological group, that group will spiral unchecked into absurdity. Their primary goal then becomes the acquisition …
/r/MensRights06/09/21 07:12 PM
1

Good grief.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 05:23 PM
1

Driving cars also causes deaths. Free speech prevents more deaths than it might be "responsible" for.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:43 PM
5

You are exactly right.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 03:14 PM
24

Completely at odds with the most fundamental principles of Western Justice, and is a lynch mob mentality. There have increasingly been moves to erode basic principles of justice, of which this is an expression. The Ghomesi Case in Canada is a notable and thankfully failed example of this. The 2 principles under attack are:- Blackstone's Rule, which is a foundational principle of western justice. It reads:- 'It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer'. Prosecutor's …
/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:48 PM
2

They fired the man who created this Ad.:- Black Currant Tango Ad
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:27 PM
2

When the shoe is on the other foot it doesn't feel so comfortable. Consistency in legal principles can be a bitch sometimes.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 03:02 PM
2

I am not sure I see that much toxicity here, certainly not of the entrenched ideological kind. I see some angry or ill judged comments but nothing really systemic. A fair proportion of what I read here is well thought out. But then definitions of toxic can be subjective.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 09:41 PM
2

"Joining an ideological bubble reinforces a sense of moral superiority that becomes really seductive. It allows you to justify a lot of behavior that is egregious." - Anon
/r/MensRights03/07/21 05:19 PM
2

'well women attempt it more' There is a big difference between suicide and attempted suicide, ie one involves death and the other does not. I find your reflexive response somewhat uncaring considering your interest in social justice. Is my usual response. The tone and actual wording will depend on context. I keep the unmeasuabilty point ready as required. Overloading points clouds the debate and commonly results in a shit show. My 2 previous points can also be reduced down to make them shorter a…
/r/MensRights30/06/21 01:00 PM
3

Wow, but not surprised.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 04:10 AM
2

The responses depend to some extent on the details of the argument. Do not overload your responses with too many points. However :- No True Scotsman Call them on the "No True Scotsman" fallacy reminding them you can't change the definition of feminism as you please. State the the individuals in question are self declared feminists, widely considered by others to be feminists and believe in the core feminist principles. In short they are feminists, to suggest otherwise is intellectually dishonest…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:22 PM
3

The last thing the Korean Government wants is a gender war. National Service is the first thing that would come up for debate. Those complaining this is a trivial issue do not understand Korean culture or the cultural significance of their symbols.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 05:27 PM
12

Full video. https://twitter.com/i/status/1393388732749729793
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/21 12:34 AM
12

More context, full video. https://twitter.com/i/status/1393388732749729793
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/21 12:01 AM
2

I read this with interest as I have been involved in a similar, but not so public, affair. I have also advised people in similar situations. I thought Benatar dealt with this really well, when in fact it is really difficult to do so. Here is a brain dump:- Document everything. Stay focused on the complaint and make sure other people do. Do not be drawn into other issues. Don't let them muddy the waters. Make sure the issue is kept as clear as crystal and stay on track. <- Really Important Read u…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 12:39 AM
36

Utter nightmare.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:36 PM
1

This screams Borderline Personality Disorder, they are relentlessly vindictive. If a woman has BPD run a mile.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/21 02:24 PM
3

She wants you to be an orbiting 'planet'. There will be other men in orbit she is using as well. As soon as your usefulness has gone she will drop you like a stone. This is common among some college girls. Impose your own boundaries!
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:47 PM
8

Probably at odds with their membership of the EU and Commonwealth.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 08:53 PM
2

The USA gets a lot of things wrong, but one thing they have right is their 1st Amendment, ie essentially unbridled freedom of speech. As soon as you impose speech codes on a people then you rapidly head down this type of rabbit hole. Limiting speech limits the ability to meaningfully discuss the important problems that face us, this is how democracies work. The responding Mod also needs to read the rules. Rule #1 clearly says identity OR vulnerability. Rule 1 Remember the human. Reddit is a plac…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 04:28 PM
14

What is "toxic laddish behaviour"? What are they defining as sexual harassment and assault? What level of credibility can this anonymous reporting website be given? ("independently" started by a high school girl?) Unions should not be attacking their own members. Why are people rightly terrified at speaking up against these people? Broad brush attacks on a whole of class children are irresponsible. A Totalitarianism intrudes into every of aspect of a person's life, tolerates no opposition and ru…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 10:45 PM
7

Modern day lynching, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 02:46 PM
1

From the comments section of an article on the topic:- Welcome to the new world where its indoctrination over education, victimhood over investigation, blame over understanding, one side versus the other. This new era of single-minded thought isolation has created an era where we are quick to retaliate rather than stop and listen. Schools are a place to educate, but with a generation of teachers who prefer to use their classrooms to indoctrinate and punish based on their personal beliefs rather …
/r/MensRights26/03/21 02:47 AM
1

Were is there an explicit apology in the issued statement?
/r/MensRights25/03/21 11:38 PM
7

She ties herself into intellectual knots trying explaining away the fact she lives with husband who supports her and her writing habit.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:22 AM
3

Elizabeth Hobson is a hero, good luck in her future endeavor.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:07 AM
2

Ignore Futrelle. He has been around forever ever. Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 03:06 AM
1

I have seen this a lot, including it happening to women. I have 2 female friends who lost friendships just by bringing up Jordan Peterson's name. This is what happens in cults, even the slightest dissension results in punishment or being shunned. This limits criticism of the cults philosophy through fear. There is no real solution to this and is a cost/benefit analysis problem on your part, ie balancing expression against friendship. Where the balance lies is a personal choice. One person messag…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:45 PM
1

The only difference between a cult and a religion is that a religion has been around longer, Link. All religions were cults at one point, their more revolting traits have been eroded with time. I would put modern Feminism more in the realm of a cult.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:53 PM
7

This is out of control hysteria. Historically these things die the death they deserve.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:32 AM
1

A valid fear of smearing on a galactic scale. Is is wise to steer well clear of it, in 2 weeks time it will have been forgotten. In the meantime let others dig their own graves.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:30 AM
6

It is how cults operate, dissenters are punished. That is how they retain power over people. The idea of a heretic in the RC Church is a good example of this concept. It is power through fear, and is self perpetuating once established.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:24 AM
1

EU has a host of regulations, this is almost certainly illegal. Also forward it to sympathetic media (local and national).
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:12 AM
1

If it is the USA then a Title IX complaint is pretty easy to make, or contact Mark Perry. If outside of the USA then you will need to do a little research. Usually the complaints are intentionally really easy to make. This case looks dreadful.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:07 AM
2

Biden is playing to his base, he is just blustering. DeVos went through a lengthy legal process that is difficult to undo, especially as the policy is self evidently fair. I expect little to nothing will change.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:01 AM
1

Depending on national jurisdiction, my bet this is a serious violation of equality laws. A simple complaint is usually all that is need to trigger an investigation.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:52 AM
4

Hanson dares to speak the unspeakable, she is the voice of millions.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 02:38 AM
28

The man is a complete legend! Suggesting a curfew on all men is fine, mocking that suggestion apparently is not. Where is Orwell when we need him? (women dress as men all the time, so what is the problem?)
/r/MensRights15/03/21 08:49 PM
1

The Times has gone woke? God help us.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 04:31 PM
6

The House of Lords is a place of sombre second thought and reason. In difficult times it is the last place we should expect this type of outburst from. She was placed there supposedly for her experience and wisdom, not so she could spout partisan and devise hyperbole.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:03 PM
2

De-Radicalisation and Cult De-programming is notoriously difficult. The kill a snake you cut its head off, in this case de-fund Gender Studies programs.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:49 AM
2

This is stereotyping on a galactic scale, the Green Party should be ashamed of her. Certain racial demographics dominate violence statistics, perhaps the UK should have a racially based curfew? The fact that far more men are the victims of stranger violence seems to elude her, as does the mantra that women are more likely to be assaulted in the home. You can't have your cake and eat it. Hysteria has no place in the House of Lords, it is a place of sombre second thought.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 05:26 PM
4

There are EU regulation as well. Men need to complain like hell as well, this how women got this 'bonus'.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 04:56 PM
1

Any stable society will have a hierarchy as far as we know. You are correct in saying this is maintained by 'gaslighting' the work force. Their new world vision is a Utopia of universal 'equality', usually involving Marxist principles. History shows us the road to Utopia usually leads to Ethiopia and totalitarianism instead. Human societies and human nature are simply too complex to be able to predict the effects of large scale changes. This is why Utopian visions are dangerous, especially when …
/r/MensRights10/03/21 03:19 PM
1

Doubling the work force lowers wages which benefits capitalism but not the workers. The new world people are trying to create has nothing to with capitalism though.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 02:50 PM
12

This is manipulation of language as proposed by the likes of Gramsci and Foucalt. They teach this shite in universities and is exactly what Orwell warned about. Affecting language affects culture as it limits the range of expressible thoughts, in this case the criticism of females. It is through this process they intend to mold society to their liking. It should be fought at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 05:10 AM
2

First World problems.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:08 PM
2

I don't subscribe to the idea of a gender culture war because it is ultimately self-defeating. Neither do I. But presently it exists and is being used by some as a vehicle for other purposes. The quicker it goes the better.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:03 PM
2

The injection of phrases like "toxic masculinity" and -ve depictions of men are a pre-meditated application of theories that come from Critical Theory and Postmodernism; more specifically from Gramsci and Foucalt. This type of thing should be called out at every opportunity. These phrases and -ve depictions are vile and insulting period, and no further discussion should be tolerated. You are correct in saying that the MRM is young and involves a fair amount of catharsis. However, the MRM is matu…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 07:07 PM
3

Social change is firstly a battle of language, a fact that should never be forgotten. Language affects the way people see their world. The MRM has not been good at this but is getting better.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 05:16 PM
3

Sadly, being nice has little to do with political progress.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:33 PM
1

Comparing women's aid to the KKK isn't fair. The comparison with the KKK is clearly a simile and not literal, e.g. as brave as a lion, as strong as an ox. Women's Aid spends a lot of its time demonising men and deserves what is said about them - 'if you live by the pen you die by the pen'.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 03:57 PM
754

Good grief, they do not even hide it.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 10:03 PM
3

The jury took 10 mins to to return a verdict. What the hell is wrong with the Crown Prosecution Service. The accuser as usual will face no charges.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 04:25 PM
8

The boys should complain the same way the girls do. Then make a Title IX complaint if they do not respond.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 01:47 PM
4

An artcle about people who write this uniformed stuff would be more useful.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 01:55 AM
4

Just another worded created and promoted by those who benefit from social discord.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 07:01 AM
1

You could come up with a whole load of directives that might "improve" the atmosphere and students at Harvard. Examples would be:- Hall of residence curfews for ensuring student safety. A business attire dress code would prepare students for life after college Compulsory weekly assemblies to improve communication. They did not choose any of these. They choose to ban single sex clubs, with a list of dishonest reasons that are as inane as those above. It was in your face social engineering and mor…
/r/MensRights07/02/21 08:16 PM
5

I think they knew the chances of it surviving legal challenges were slim. But being in effect for the few years it did caused tremendous damage.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 07:25 PM
3

Its all about power- ie look at what we can say and get away with it. They re-frame it as satire, humor or a reasonable expression of anger. They are just nasty pieces of work and should be called to account loudly. The squeaky wheel gets oiled.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 05:49 PM
1

Perpetrator is a trans-woman, offenses when she was a man. This a really fucked up case.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 07:02 AM
1

Good speech.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 03:56 AM
1

Mao's China, Stalin's Russia and Orwell's1984 all come to mind. Zero out of ten for originality.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 07:35 PM
3

Conscription is the Achilles Heal of the feminist vision of an "Equal Society". Their "theoretical frameworks" start collapsing as soon as war and conscription are brought into the discussion.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 07:01 PM
1

It is all about power, not solving problems. The problems go then so does the power.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 04:42 PM
8

This is almost certainly not legal in the US as they are denying a service. They should address the specific problems and not stereotype of whole group. This has been posted before btw.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 04:42 PM
3

Why is an 9 worth than an 8? That's a question I would like answered.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 05:36 PM
2

It is a question of degree. These men sound like inexperienced and possibly emotionally immature men. As soon as a guy starts talking about what sex was like the night before, then 'detect bullshit' neurons start firing all over the place. It is the most unreliable piece of information you will ever hear. Guys who have grown up will almost never, or at least rarely, talk like that.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 09:13 PM
0

It makes sense for women to discuss men from an evolutionary point of view. Women are taking a bigger risk in the mating/marriage game. Sharing information about men allows women to make a more informed choice. Men talk little about women as sharing information with your competitors does not make sense.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 08:39 PM
27

'Locker Room Talk' with men in my experience is fairly limited. Men actually rarely talk about women. The term 'Locker Room Talk' is yet one more noun phrase used in the battle of language, they are the stock-in-trade of the propagandist.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 03:49 PM
1

Douglas Murray is always a delight to listen to.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:06 PM
2

There used to be video on YouTube about a conference in the UK disrupted by feminists in the late 70's or 80's. It seems to have been taken down.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:57 PM
2

The article's headline is misleading. Reversing these regulations would be a monumental task. This was pointed out deep down in the article.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:52 PM
1

I hope some of the tweets etc from public figures and media retraxtions/apologies were screen shot.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:50 PM
12

A smorgasbord of personality disorders, mostly BPD. (Sheila Jeffries is especially vile)
/r/MensRights14/01/21 05:49 AM
19

Sophie Walker simply ignores difficult points and then tries to re-frame the debate in her favour. She is an intellectually dishonest debater. Anne Widicombe is a delight.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/21 12:05 AM
3

I was going to sarcastically suggest the answer was toxic and fragile masculinity. It looks like I was largely right. The sad thing is that I am not surprised. These people are so cognitively biased they truly believe what they saying. Their analysis of the world around them is through a dogmatic, ideological lens that is little different to any religion. Dogma is infallible and their conclusions must not contradict it. Diversity of opinion is unusual at the BBC.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 12:52 AM
1

The feminist woman has been caught up in a cult and is incapable of objective thought. Her notions of social engineering are naive beyond belief and have foundations of sand. Utopian and emotionally pleasing political visions are easy foisted on young, impressionable minds. History has shown us time and and time again they do not take into account the complexity of human condition and are disastrous. The university system has done this woman a disservice. The other woman can think for herself. T…
/r/MensRights09/01/21 03:41 PM
3

This man's work is amazing. He is causing real change.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 03:20 PM
16

This is an amazing video and an amazing woman. There is a lot of sophistication in her approach, it serves as an example. A condensed version of this is needed.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 06:12 PM
1

Frankly, kudo's to the girl for helping her man. I don't see any pussy pass denied here. Wrong sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/20 05:40 PM
3

Political fads usually do take a generation to flush through.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 03:58 PM
1

Final nail in the coffin of Academia.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 03:45 PM
-2

Monopoly
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:48 PM
26

42k now (21 mins later)
/r/MensRights22/12/20 04:39 PM
0

Haul them up in front of a Senate committee as they did with the other Tech giants. They are a monopoly and should be broken up.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 04:37 PM
4

This is an area where there is an opportunity for an original and brave thinker to do some very significant work.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 12:27 PM
3

They turned a report on a false rape conviction into a sexual assault advocacy piece. 6 months is not throwing the book at someone.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 02:45 AM
4

After reading this diatribe and your other tome - what on earth have you been smoking? If you haven't been smoking anything then perhaps you should, it might clear your head. Both your contributions are Gish Gallops of Strawmen, Ad Hominens. Red Herrings, Faulty Generalisations, factual Inaccuracies and more; all rolled into a roughly internally consistent view of the MRM that has little to no connection to reality. I do not know what lens you are viewing the world through, but I would say you n…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:31 AM
1

The article is a sad commentary on the state of the world. Arguments based on group identity and the arbitrary application of fundamental principles is a recipe for chaos.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:14 PM
4

Reading the article and links brings to mind the following words:- George Orwell, 1984.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 03:32 PM
1

Our legal system primarily criminalises typically male anti-social behaviour. This is because males are more often of a threat to the ruling elites, and why males over populate our jails. This has not always been the case, as what society considers anti-social can change with time. Gossip and rumour mongering is more typically a female behaviour and can cause enormous social damage; it is rarely punished today but used to result in the muzzle and ducking stool. The Men's Rights movement need to …
/r/MensRights05/12/20 04:21 PM
10

Misogyny as a hate crime is going to backfire, the Law Commission is recommending all genders be protected. This will silence a lot of feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 05:56 AM
3

Paternity fraud is the vilest of crime. Powerful groups to be have managed to minimize societal outrage for an array of reasons. Men need to make this a huge issue.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:26 AM
13

Why is the video age restricted? The answer my guess is odious. Vile women.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:14 AM
1

Candice Owens is one of the last people r/mensrights should be criticizing.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:22 PM
10

Go against the feminist orthodoxy and lose you job. We live in dangerous times.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 05:22 PM
13

... and he should be fired?
/r/MensRights27/11/20 04:36 PM
6

Feminism is not a science, it is a set of theories in the same range as Eugenics, Phrenology and Astrology. Pertinent criteria for a Pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 09:18 PM
2

It is in your face distasteful and repugnant. It is institutional thuggery and shows them for what they really are. The page needs a screen shot.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 04:24 PM
2

This is a cute video of a sister with her little brother. It does not belong here.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/20 03:06 PM
3

3 points:- This will put a chill on relationships. This is probably a Supreme Court issue. $6,000,000 is an awful lot for 3 years of a hookers services.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 05:19 PM
1

Good old fashioned race baiting, nothing more, nothing less. The NYTimes is an abomination.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 10:43 PM
4

Like most of these moves it will back fire. They will probably uncover more underpaid men than women, as happened with Google.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:04 AM
2

From Wikipedia:- Culture is an umbrella term which encompasses the social behavior and norms) found in human societies, as well as the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, capabilities, and habits of the individuals in these groups A subculture is a group of people within a culture that differentiates itself from the parent culture to which it belongs, often maintaining some of its founding principles. I am not sure a group bound by political interests, or a forum where they exchange ideas, …
/r/MensRights16/10/20 02:41 PM
2

History will laugh at them in 20yrs time, and probably silently is now. I have not read such a load of bunkum in ages. Hollywood is driven by one thing, ie Money. When the present political realities fade away this document will silently disappear and be scrubbed from the Internet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/20 04:38 AM
1

Would you consider Feminism a subculture? The very word 'Subculture' commonly carries extra meaning and I would challenge your framing from the get go.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 04:31 AM
37

Sounds like a piece of dishonest research. Believing in equality for women and being feminist are not the same thing. Other studies differ:- 29% identify as feminist USA. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/american-women-and-feminism <20% Identify as feminist UK. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47006912
/r/MensRights09/10/20 09:46 PM
3

Why does she have a Hindu Bindi on her forehead? Haque is an Islamic name and ironically means truth.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:48 PM
43

Peter Lloyd is great and is great TV, which allows him to get his message across. He understands how to use language. Who can forget this classic, his smile is priceless LINK.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 02:07 PM
15

It highlights the often forgotten fact that most men also did not have the vote in the 19th century. In fact all men did not have it till 1918 in the UK.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:33 AM
2

I like the comments on language.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:14 PM
2

I thought prostitution was illegal in Canada.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 03:34 AM
97

His mother committed suicide 1 year later, suffering from depression at his death. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3714547/Heartbroken-mother-55-teenager-hanged-false-rape-allegations-kills-anniversary-death-couldn-t-future-without-him.html https://metro.co.uk/2016/07/29/mother-of-teen-who-hanged-himself-over-false-rape-allegations-commits-suicide-6037994/
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:24 PM
12

Just paid r/bertstrips a visit. It is frigging hilarious.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 01:29 AM
1

The National Enquirer for champagne socialists. Even worse than the BBC.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:27 PM
5

The BBC is a public broadcaster and is obliged to be balanced, and in fact advertise themselves as such. They are clearly not balanced and the UK public is increasingly aware of this, their mishandling of Brexit coverage angered a lot of people. It has become the Fox News of the left. Being balanced and reliable is the only selling point they have to distinguish themselves in a massively competitive media market. They are squandering their reputation. The BBC is also by far the most influential …
/r/MensRights06/09/20 04:53 PM
0

The problems in measuring this statistic are endless. Some of the main issues are:- There is no well defined or standardised definition of attempted suicide. How do you discriminate between a true suicide attempt and attention seeking or a call for help? Many health areas record any self harm as attempted suicide. This in inflates the numbers for females Not all attempted suicides end up at the hospital. eg the man who pulls the gun away from his head, the man removed from the noose by a friend …
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:56 PM
49

The BBC is the the biggest propaganda machine in history. People are getting sick and tired of them in the UK. They must either radically change or they will be replaced. A license for a rival broadcaster has already been issued. In short the BBC is an abomination.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:19 PM
4

The rate of attempted suicide is essentially an un-measurable statistic. The idea that women attempt suicide more is still repeated as a fact. There is no peer reviewed research supporting the statistic.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 02:01 PM
2

The article is advocating equality of outcome over equality of opportunity right from the start. The rest of the article is dreadful.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 09:46 PM
1

Did the speaker try to stop him for calling her out for using that type of language?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/20 02:55 PM
1

Marc Angelucci got killed? WTF!!?
/r/MensRights15/08/20 01:18 PM
5

This story is historic and shows how far back suppression of ideas against the narrative go.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 01:10 PM
4

I like the description of Gender Studies as "A Moral Framework together with 'what should be' and a set of lenses to view the world through." In other words indoctrinated. This is an amazing interview.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:25 PM
19

“We know that men will deny, minimise, blame & mutualise their violence, & present as the victim” - Jacqui Watt This woman is a monster.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 01:54 PM
1

I seen women like this who are then horrified to see men they are attracted to going out with charming women who take pride in their appearance.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/20 05:40 PM
1

I just hope to God this is fake. Everything about this is awful. This is the devastation that can come from lying about paternity.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:42 PM
3

Link
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:42 PM
4

Frankly I am not surprised and I predict others will follow suit. There are a fair number of countries who have signed by not ratified it. It is dreadful document on many levels. The claim of ideological elements is obviously correct. "gender": to be defined as "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men." Crimilisation of large range of behaviour including:- psychological abuse, stalking and all non-consentu…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:31 PM
3

55% Western Sydney University, Australia Link 56% University of Bologna Link
/r/MensRights19/07/20 10:22 PM
2

Flood traded in any academic integrity he had for personal gain years ago. He is the least reliable source on anything he writes about.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 07:42 PM
6

The article read like something from a Dystopian novel, something that Orwell or Huxley might have written
/r/MensRights19/07/20 12:19 PM
1

He is a triumph of Evolution.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 02:05 PM
7

This is a long overdue initiative.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 01:58 PM
1

I am confused by this, prostitution is not illegal in Canada. Selling sex is legal, buying sex is not.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/20 08:09 PM
1

In the meantime, false accusations of rape or sexual assault will remain consequence free.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/20 04:30 AM
3

Even better.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 02:27 PM
18

Translation:- Board decides TU Eindhoven preference policy To reduce the structural and persistent backlog of female scientists at universities, you can pursue a preference policy as a university. However, the way in which Eindhoven University of Technology (TU / E) has formulated its preference policy goes too far and is therefore in conflict with Dutch equal treatment legislation. That is how the Board of Human Rights judged. The College ruled on 2 July last about the Irène Curie Fellowship (I…
/r/MensRights06/07/20 01:44 PM
2

It is a report about the state of the chicken coop from the fox. The author Micheal Flood traded in any academic integrity he had for personal gain years ago. He is poster child of what is wrong with our university system.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 06:40 PM
27

Complete horror story. I agree, her sentence and consequences are the not the problem it is the severity of the sentences handed to men.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:32 PM
1

It is called the Prosecutors Fallacy. It is a dangerous line of argument that can ruin innocent lives.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 05:25 AM
2

Unless I am missing something there is no woke Gillette Ad this year either.
/r/MensRights21/06/20 03:55 PM
2

I gave up on Wikipedia years ago. I used to be very active but the editorial bias is not worth it. Dissenters are banned fairly rapidly.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 01:38 AM
5

The story was always anecdotal and no 'reliable' references could be found. For instance, Wikipedia editors simply denied it occurred and refused to have it on her page. I had also never seen the exact wording of what she said. Few here probably remember the days of MacKinnon and Dworkin. MacKinnon in particular had more affect on present day feminist thinking than just about anyone else alive. Both of them are vile.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 06:27 PM
1

The fact men are the vast majority still has to be inferred from the text. Explicitly stating a fact has more impact that having to infer it. I ask the question as to who is responsible for creating these reports. What level of bias are we dealing with. I do not think their new report shows good faith.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 10:20 PM
5

I would call those responses uncaring and sexist, not the attitudes of someone concerned with social justice.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 02:50 PM
1

Sounds like Sado-Masochist screed.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 06:09 AM
1

Why did this even make it to court?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 06:25 PM
5

Congratulations Elizabeth. You are a gift to J4MB and Human Rights in general.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 08:36 PM
1

This woman is amazing and a breath of fresh air on these issues. She makes one of the most well argued cases on this I have heard.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:21 PM
1

First rate video!
/r/MensRights24/05/20 11:57 PM
0

But they tell us Cultural Marxism is a myth. They are not really attacking male social institutions.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 04:28 PM
1

There are a whole host of mechanisms that have resulted in this type of vile language becoming common place. The main sustaining mechanism though is Confirmation Bias (which is a fancy word for bigotry). But as the saying goes:- You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. I do not think vile anti-male commentary is sustainable in the long term, and its demise is hastened by people calling it out for what it i…
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:40 PM
-1

It is just a tongue cheek poke at men. A bit of harmless satire, lighten up and get a sense of humor. /s
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:48 AM
2

These guys look like smiling cult members. I ask myself, what the hell is going through these grinning idiots minds? Big Kudo's to Lisa Britton.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:23 AM
2

The main stream media were very quiet about all of this. A discrimination narrative was far more to their liking.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 03:10 PM
2

Biden needs to be questioned hard about this topic. But the media will avoid it at all costs
/r/MensRights13/05/20 02:36 PM
1

Basing legal processes on 'victims' come forward or not, is a very dangerous legal precedent to make.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 06:07 AM
5

Badly formed Utilitarian arguments can lead to a very dangerous world. Nobody is safe if the well being of the collective is the only consideration.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 06:01 AM
45

Looking from the outside, Australia seems to be in the grips of a hysteria that political scientists will be analysing for years to come. Watching Sen. Leyonhjelm arguing with the ideologically possessed in Senate Committees has confirmed this to the rest of the World. eg LINK
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:04 PM
1

Your argument is idiotic.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/20 02:53 PM
2

Where is anything about him being black in my post?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/20 01:37 PM
4

She was naively and tragically unaware the social dynamics of the situation she was in. This is a violent young man who comes from a violent world, he was a powder keg. More context would be helpful.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/20 04:08 AM
1

Media reports suggest it was all staged - ie fake.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/20 07:47 PM
4

Literally Orwellian DoublSpeak. Keep the population confused, make 'good' = 'bad' and 'bad' = 'good'. Repeat this frequently. Distorting peoples reality is a Totalitarian tactic.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 04:24 PM
1

Saying something like that about men would not be considered controversial.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 01:08 PM
-1

Post on r/theDonald
/r/MensRights24/04/20 03:38 AM
15

She eventually got 2 years for manslaughter. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/woman-jailed-for-more-than-two-years-for-killing-control-freak-husband-with-wooden-pole-a4110796.html
/r/MensRights24/04/20 03:31 AM
25

The fact she can say that and suffer no consequences is a sign of our dreadful times. Race and gender hatred is being whipped up. This formula is as old as time itself for gaining political power. She said this in November 2018, and has suffered no consequences.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 03:27 PM
1

Great reply! Well argued and supported with citattion.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:58 PM
1

She wrote the remarkable book "The Manipulated Man". Book Synopsis:- The book argues that, contrary to common feminist and women's rights rhetoric, women in industrialized cultures are not oppressed, but rather exploit a well-established system of manipulating men. Vilar writes, "Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina." The book con…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:35 PM
1

But oh! oh! oh!, these memes don't mean every woman called Karen or every person in Florida!. /s
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:15 PM
8

This is straight out of Orwell's 1984. They are trying to limit language and the power to express contrary ideas. In the meantime Memes like Manspreading, Mansplaining and Toxic Masculinity, are just fine.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 03:14 PM
2

They are right, this is about power and the weaponisation of sexual assault for political gain.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:08 PM
3

Really well argued video.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 05:56 PM
5

The shite coming out of the Guardians behind just never stops coming.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:47 PM
3

These guys are hilarious :-)
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:04 AM
2

Reminds me of the Huff Post Editors picture of all women:- https://twitter.com/lheron/status/733758898855940098
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:32 AM
3

The language is Welsh and is at Swansea University. Mind boggling. .
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:03 PM
3

Corporal punishment of boys continued till the Mid 1970's in most British school.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:55 PM
1

The women are "not payed for home labour" is a smoke and mirrors trick of framing.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 01:00 PM
3

From the comments section:- I had to write this quote by Dr. Fiamengo down because it's so brilliant: "While men have always been measured against the standard of the good man—this is one who supports his family, including his wife, defends justice, protects the weak, defeats evil—the ideal of the good woman has become a pre-1960s relic. Ask a feminist what a good woman is and she will either laugh scornfully and refuse to answer or say that a good woman fights the patriarchy. In other words, sh…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 12:15 AM
1

As usual Fiamengo is amazing in her analysis.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 12:11 AM
2

In 'he said she said' cases, the opinions of highly partisan commenters are rarely of much worth in my experience. This regardless of the political stripe of the writer.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:40 AM
1

The article was written by Brian & Eddie Krassenstein, the well know anti-Trump trolls. Probably a politically motivated hit piece against Reade.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 08:14 PM
6

This is a nasty insidious group. They are an openly feminist organisation.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 05:21 PM
3

In men, that type of violent behavior is socially policed by being hit back. This creates a deterrent and is the only practical way of keeping the peace. There used to be a social contract that women don't hit people and that men did not hit women. If women want to break that contract then they should expect to be hit back as deterrent to their behavior.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:54 AM
5

I hope you removed it.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:50 AM
11

I admiration for this man's work is unending.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 07:35 PM
3

The only way to stop this kind of biased shite is to complain, campaign, protest and through the ballot box.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:11 PM
2

History will look back at this as an abomination.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:42 PM
1

How does MGTOW relate to this post?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:02 PM
2

From the comments section:- "A diverse elite does not make a just society."
/r/MensRights24/03/20 06:33 PM
7

Similar to the Carl Sargeant case, but he committed suicide. LINK
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:58 PM
5

If they are living as a man and experience the same issues other man do, then yes they come under the MRM umbrella. As to whether they are "real men" is a different issue and is irrelevant to us. The MRM is gender inclusive.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 12:43 PM
6

added
/r/MensRights22/03/20 12:36 PM
6

I find this article and it links are deeply disturbing. The attitudes are completely at odds with ideas at the foundation of our society. Robinson College is absurdly at odds with its own policies (kudos to u/magnets). The Government has also declared that free speech is to be protected at universities LINK. The fact:- Amnesty International actions should be influenced by the views of their donors (ie money). Are explicitly a pro-feminist organisation. Frankly, is an abomination.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 01:11 PM
3

It is Orwellian.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 01:00 PM
2

I am puzzled as to why the NY times has published this. The fact the accused is LGBT and the villain is a man probably has something to with it. There are 100's if not 1000's of cases involving men that are far, far worse. The court records can show this. It could be an LGBT sympathy piece trying to exclude LGBT and women from the ramifications of Title IX. More optimistically, it could be piece of overdue responsible journalism highlighting the issues with Title IX. Using an LGBT couple as an e…
/r/MensRights20/03/20 01:17 PM
2

Unavailable in Canada.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 09:57 PM
3

Link for those out of the USA:- https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6sjbsf
/r/MensRights19/03/20 09:15 PM
2

A drop in convictions is perhaps due to a drop in the number of rapes? Surely they should be celebrating.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 09:01 PM
2

This man understands the mechanism at play in our world and is doing something about it. He has my admiration.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:19 AM
4

You are entirely correct and as an issue is not discussed enough.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:21 PM
4

Women usually object to this more than men.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 10:49 PM
19

Straight out of Orwell's 1984 and NewSpeak. Dictionary definitions are supposed to reflect common usage.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:22 PM
5

The UN is rapidly losing relevance and becoming a liability. This document is barefaced, ideological social engineering on a scale never seen before. The lessons of Stalin Russia, Mao's China and Pol Pot's Cambodia seem to have been forgotten. Social change based on theories that ignore the complexity of the human condition have repeatedly proved disastrous. These type of documents come from departments run by the ideologically possessed. They are departments that exist because of political pres…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:33 PM
1

Bernays was Freud's nephew, a sociopath and arugauble one of the most influential people of the 20th Century. "The True Believer. Thoughts on the nature of mass movements" by Eric Holder, is also worth reading. (full PDF's on web)
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:28 PM
0

Good fucking grief. Basically a label and smear job. If there ever was an example of 'hate speech' this is one.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:43 PM
15

Utterly disgusting load of pretend journalists. They left this error up for 9 days, did not actually change the article and could not be bothered to find the actual statistic. A complaint to IPSO should be made.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:15 PM
1

Totalitarianism polices every aspect of a persons life. This is what this seems like.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 09:27 PM
6

Straight out of Orwell's 1984 and NewSpeak.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 05:14 PM
12

Principle of sentencing:- Deterrent Punishment Rehabilitation It looks like they are trying to rewrite fundamental principles.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 03:52 AM
1

The inference being that career progression is the important outcome. Individual men are being denied access to this "career progression". But more importantly, the purpose of a university is not just so people can earn more money. Getting access to higher education and a degree is an outcome in of itself.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:17 PM
2

Mark Perry is amazing, what he is doing is bringing about real change.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:40 PM
1

Great idea for a sub.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:33 PM
1

Great project idea. However, Wikipedia is overwhelmed by anti-male forces; they will swarm your attempts with comments, edits and long term suspensions. The appeals system is policed by feminist leaning Mods.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 02:05 PM
5

The worst of crimes, nasty woman
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:50 PM
5

This will not be recorded a Partner Homicide as the killer was someone else. This is how screwed up the statistics used in public debate are.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:30 PM
8

Good grief. Taylor Swift is talentless creation of her father and his money. She is a Frankenstein.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 08:53 PM
1

The Guardian is left wing propaganda and piece of garbage.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:24 AM
0

Yet we also find that transition improves mental health !?! The world has gone mad. https://www.theguardian.pe.ca/news/world/sex-change-operations-yield-long-term-mental-health-benefits-for-transgender-people-374046/
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:23 AM
1

Excellent advice!
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:09 PM
1

The usual disingeous and poltically self serving framing of issues. Decontructing those paragraphs leaves you with a mountain of hidden assumptions. These are the propaganda techniques and langauge games these bums play.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:08 PM
423

Vera Baird is a monster, a bigot and a political opportunist. The gender separated homicide statistics are some of the most misused statistics out there. The BBC as usual gets on the propaganda train.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 02:45 PM
1

Carefully document everything then get someone to make a Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:41 PM
2

These poster are political and propaganada. Remove them.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:34 PM
2

These cases are usually made to quietly disappear because of the obvious analogy with women's gyms etc.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 02:57 PM
2

This will prbably affect the Egyptian tourist business for a while to come.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 07:54 PM
1

This is the inevitable result of feminist social engineers changing the public consciousness as to the relative seriousness of different crimes. They assumed their actions would only affect their target, ie men. Little did they realise, or care, that their patriarchy and oppression theories have no connection to reality. They are a malignant force in our society who history will look back on in disgust. There is something wrong in our society when a woman like this takes her own life when she ha…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 07:47 PM
10

The "official process guidelines" are the result of lobby groups such as Rights of Women and the Fawcett Society. These behind the scenes groups are undemocratically changing the way our law works, and only for the benefit of one half of society.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 08:23 PM
2

Brilliant
/r/MensRights12/02/20 10:22 PM
2

Once this notion has lost credibilty they will invent something else. It used to be 'Mansplaining', then onto 'Manspreading" and now this. It is the media and pandering politicians give these ideas life.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 05:47 PM
3

Publicly humiliate an member of the public, way to go. I hope this goes the TV standards committee and they are forced to apologise.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 05:41 PM
1

The BBC article is a triumph of DoubleSpeak. It is full of phrases carrying an emotional weight that appeals its target audience, but in reality have no meaning at all. The article is essentially gobbledygook.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:38 PM
5

Get your parents to make a formal complaint. All these type of things do is breed bitterness.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 07:12 PM
21

The sentence can be appealed to the Attorney General's office by any member of the public for being unduly lenient.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 07:07 PM
56

Someone must search out those incorporated companies with women only boards. I bet there are more than you think.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 06:45 PM
7

In years gone past this would not have been an issue. Decades of unpleasant and divisive Feminist activism makes this a non-starter; you can not have your cake and eat it. It was their gender that started this shite and now they have to live with it. Enjoy the new world your Feminist friends created ladies.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:15 PM
3

Manitoba has a Right Wing government. The houses are for Aboriginal Woman. Aboriginal Women are a fashionable cause atm. Nobody gives a shit about Aboriginal Men; no political advantage gained from that.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 04:36 PM
2

Angelucci is a true hero of Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 05:13 PM
-2

Click bait and utterly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 05:04 PM
4

God help Finland.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:11 PM
2

Checkwith your union if you have one. You are hired to do your job not be Mr. Nice Guy. Most labour law I am aware of does not you have to be friendly.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 08:31 PM
1

Pay walled.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 10:42 PM
2

Amazing work!
/r/MensRights12/01/20 08:16 AM
3

Now complain about ads showing women putting on make up; ads for typically female clothing using female models etc, etc. If people don't I have no sympathy. The world has gone mad.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:08 PM
4

Buy your junk food else where, complain and protest.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 09:59 PM
9

Good for him. The use of intentionally ambiguous language is despicable. Though in reality it is not ambiguous at all.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:08 AM
1

No True Scotsman argument - is when someone tries to change the definition of a word in order to ignore a valid counter-example.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 02:38 AM
5

Reads like an article from the Onion.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:20 PM
3

I'd like to know what are the behind the lobby groups and other forces that brought about this 'initiative' by the Mayors office. Who actually is running our country? A background article quotes:- "..women are more likely than men to be sent to prison for a first-time offence." Another wonder of statistical misuse. The reason is because men are more likely to be charged in the first place. Women are only charged if not doing so would shock the conscience.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:25 AM
6

Interesting book. The fact that Feminist intrusion into our institutions is even being discussed, is both surprising and uplifting. The Feminist mantra is that power lies solely at the top, complaining about the number of women in government and the number of female CEO's. In reality most power that affects society is situated at the decision making level of our institutions, from the lowest clerk to the managerial level. This is in addition to lobby groups, government advisory committees and th…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 04:22 PM
5

'Objectification' is a meaningless word made up by propagandists and social engineers. Because it has no real meaning it can not be argued against
/r/MensRights26/12/19 03:13 PM
3

First rate post!!
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:40 PM
3

I'd hope /s was not needed in this sub.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:24 PM
8

Click bait at best and not worthy of a response. Silence is all it deserves. But beware noun phrases, eg:- War on Drugs, Toxic Masculinity, Fake News, War on Terror, etc These are phrases that evoke an emotional response that is used by propagandists. They are propaganda 101. As soon as you read such a phrase stop and think. "Fragile Masculinity" clearly fits into this category.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:52 AM
8

The patriarchy makes them do it.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:41 AM
1

God almighty, Phillips and Starmer are candiatates. Looks like Boris is going to be PM for a while. Starmer is even worse than Phillips.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 07:55 PM
5

This is ideologues attempting to change the structure of society without the consent of the majority. They frame their arguments by quoting 'Principles' that are apparently beyond debate and contain the conclusion they want embedded in them. It is Circular Reasoning. Their 'Principles' have come out of thin air and have been accepted by some due to their constant repetition, ie Argument by Repetition.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 10:02 PM
1

Gaslighting
/r/MensRights28/11/19 05:28 PM
3

The commissars of "NewSpeak" paid him a visit.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 10:52 PM
3

Pay walled.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 10:48 PM
3

You need to look at Esther Vilar's book - The Manipulated Man https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manipulated_Man The Manipulated Man (German: Der Dressierte Mann) is a 1971 book by author Esther Vilar. The main idea behind the book is that women are not oppressed by men but rather control men to their advantage
/r/MensRights27/11/19 07:59 PM
20

Lol. priceless. I thought there was a wage gap anyway?
/r/MensRights26/11/19 06:52 PM
7

Self contradictory gibberish.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 06:24 PM
2

A change.org petition is needed to remove this woman from TV.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 03:25 AM
3

I disagree with some of your premises. In any group there are going to be bad apples. I'd argue the number of undesirable people claiming to be MRA's is not statistically signficant, if anything it is the other way around. The MRM is not a single unit, any attempt at large scale organisation has been stifled by very powerful forces. I need not tell you where these forces lay. There has been a very effective campaign of demonisation of the MRM. People are largely lazy thinkers and will follow the…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:57 PM
2

This man is standing up to a politicaly corrupt system. What is going on in Wales is a disgrace to democracy, Womans Aid Wales as a result has morphed into the most hideous organistaion on the island. There was no political class or culture in Wales at this level of governement when the Assembly was created. As a result Welsh politics is little different to any fledgeling democracy, ie it is plagued with 3rd world political problems such as coruption, bullying, vote rigging and out right thugger…
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:33 PM
7

Further digging shows the quoted research is by a Debra Parkinson, but when interviewed she said:- But Dr Parkinson told Seven News that although she did find an increase in family violence in fire-affected communities, she did not say it was about firefighters. So basically this monster Sherele Moody can not even read the read the research properly, she read what she wanted to read.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:50 PM
5

The link in the text is to "1-800 RESPECT". The irony is galactic in scale.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:27 PM
2

Despicable lot. The relevant graph is on page 7; note the blue for female and brown for male. History will look back in horror.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 04:46 PM
1

The phrase "Overwhelming Majority" is used by many journalists. Great link to counter this phrase.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 04:12 PM
8

Many women know nothing about doing hair, my wife included. I was the one who did our daughters' hair. I just got a book and taught myself.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 07:48 PM
3

Any report from Bristol University on gender related issues is propaganda.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 01:04 PM
1

Nice example of the Us vs Them mindset.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:34 PM
16

The Guardian never fails to amaze me at the intellectually thin, bigoted bullshit they write. I read this article from start to finish, wasting a minute of my life, it reads like a sermon to a congregation of mindless religious fanatics.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:32 PM
5

Family court decisions are commonly appalling and would evoke public outrage if know. Much of it comes from misuse of the "best interest of the child" principle, and feminist legal lobbies influencing the guide lines issued to the courts. No wonder they want to keep a wrap on journalists.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:44 PM
6

This is activism of which we need more. If people do not complain about these blatant hypocrisies then they will simply continue.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:38 PM
1

Nasty woman.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:53 AM
2

Some very smart people have tried, it is controlled by a crew of SJW's. You will make no headway since the mods who arbtrate disputes are ultra-SJW's. Any seroius attempts to improve that page will simple get you banned for a year or pemanently. Don't waste any emotional energy on it. The talk of a hostile environment for women on wikipedia is a joke relatiive to this.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:14 PM
7

I've just read the page and it is utterly absurd. I gave up on Wikipedia some time back, it s an SJW institution and echo chamber.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 01:58 PM
3

It was framed as mental health issue, gah! https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-times-tribune/20191029/281651076899761
/r/PussyPass30/10/19 04:30 AM
3

She was well aware she was her dad. You were male in a 'female space'.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:59 AM
2

Its 100%, these people know little of boys lives.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 01:58 PM
3

The world has gone mad.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:44 PM
3

Good grief, I am rarely lost for words but am close to it here. Australia has a BIG problem on its hands. This reads like something from the Chinese Cultural Revolution. The ideologically possessed have taken over Australia.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:39 PM
3

We need more activism at this level. Well done!! Hopefully your class mates will follow your example.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 11:55 PM
3

This is activism at its finest!
/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:24 PM
8

The NDP are idiots, they will NEVER get my vote. This man is intellectually dishonest and a vote panderer. He should be asked about a women's right to discuss circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 02:07 PM
1

Crosspost to r/rage
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:53 PM
19

People need to complain, it is that simple. Bring a discrimination law suit.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:26 AM
1

The only way you stop this shit is to COMPLAIN!!, complain a lot and often.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:24 AM
2

They are trying to create social norms, through repetition of the idea. Universities have no business doing this. Their legal opinion is also faulty and irresponsible.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 11:00 PM
3

Intellectually thin virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 01:53 PM
2

Phil Davies is a hero, doing significant human rights work. Jess Phillips has learned her lesson and kept her fat mouth shut, her performance a few years back was horrific LINK.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 03:05 PM
7

Vera Baird is utter trash and a monster. The 'believe the victim' mentality has proved disastrous in police investigations.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:52 PM
1

Make your mission statement a list of goals that no one could disagree with. Your focus is in your mission statement. When asked why you are not doing something, simply state it is not our focus. Do not get drawn into debate by groups attempting to smear you. Your words will be twisted. You have no opinions outside of the topics of your mission statement. The power of 'no response' is one of the most powerful defense tactics you have. If they try to taunt you in nonconstructive interactions, sim…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 03:28 PM
8

WTF is this type of statistical propaganda doing in the Smithsonian?! The Wage Gap issue is a smoke and mirrors operation to increase the size of the work force, so corporations can reduce wages even further. They are trying to make it normal for a family to require both partners to work ever hour god has made. Feminists with easy jobs and fat pay checks are fine with this, it gives them something to complain about to remain relevant and have political power. Women with with any sense will not f…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:28 AM
2

Staged, chameleon - what do you mean?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:13 PM
3

Great video
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:12 PM
1

The fact it had to be amended in the first place is appalling.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 07:48 PM
1

Great story.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 08:36 PM
1

Men using more lethal mean does not negate the fact more men by far die of suicide. There is no solid evidence concerning the rate of attempted suicides. This another femininst myth. This is because self harm and cries for help are, more often than not , recorded as suicide attempts. In essence no one reallly knows the figure is.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 07:26 PM
2

Why have I not heard of this woman before? She speaks tons of sense.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:59 AM
1

Reminds me of the compulsory 2 weeks of military training and compulsory Marxism classes in Chinese universities.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:40 AM
1

Complain, complain complain. Also complain about the nature of the notification poster. This is so outrageous I would check it is genuine first.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 04:43 PM
1

Why is this woman not in jail!!
/r/MensRights20/09/19 07:27 PM
1

Thank you for the most ill informed and bigoted comment I have read here in a very long time.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:38 PM
3

... BPD's are very uncaring of others. Many extreme feminists I have met are clearly BPD.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:39 PM
-2

Thre usually have Borderline Peronality Disorder.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:37 PM
6

Then do not expect others to "center" your issues.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:36 PM
7

Racist, sexist and written by the ideologically possesed.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:20 PM
6

The article itself is worse than the headline. It's the epitome of Toxic Feminity
/r/MensRights08/09/19 09:38 PM
1

Benevolent Sexism = Turning a cup half full into one half empty. It is the mother of all reframing tricks. The article itself was mostly fairly good, apart from its conclusion.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:15 AM
3

Go to the media.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:39 PM
1

TL;DNR
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:53 PM
1

The phrase "Toxic Masculinty" should simply be ignored. It will then slowly disappear.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 06:01 PM
2

Maddow is reframing the fact that most scientific advances has been made by white men. She is turning something positive done by white men into a negative. It is the cup half full or half empty rhetorical trick. She is a sexist and a racist.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:58 PM
5

Lisa Britton the children's author? She clearly is a clear thinker who appreciates the issues men face.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 10:10 PM
2

Women do not get paid less for the SAME work. Pay Gap figures are based on median incomes. This means women work less well paying jobs, or work fewer hours or both. I will not be buying Planters nuts from now on. They even have this bullshit web site LINK
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:51 AM
2

What I am saying is that you would have to make a very, very strong case to equivocate child support with infringement of bodily autonomy Demonstrating that child support is an equal burden or more than carrying a baby to term is at the heart of these arguments. There are certainly aspects of both burdens that can be objectively quantified, but a calculation of the relative burden would be largely subjective. The burden would also vary enormously on a case by case basis. Subjectivity and social …
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:24 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_slavery
/r/MensRights25/08/19 11:05 PM
1

Wage slavery for a start.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:42 PM
1

Our definitions of right and wrong are entirely arbitrary. They are social constructions to maintain an orderly society. They change over time and vary greatly between cultures. We are not rational beings and can be convinced as groups to believe just about anything. This explains the endless number of religions. Also for instance, many now believe we can change genders and can anyone tell me logically why swearing is bad? Our tendency as a group to believe the same thing, regardless of how arbi…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:25 PM
1

I predict riots.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 10:42 PM
1

This probably untrue and is an election ploy. https://facthunt.in/posts/553/Fact-Check-:-Delhi-government%E2%80%99s-proposal-for-free-metro-travel-for-women-cancelled-by-the-central-government.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:31 PM
1

The Labour Party in the UK has become rancid to the core. They abandoned the working class years ago.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 12:10 PM
1

His use of an academic citation shows how completely corrupt certain areas in academia have become. Flood is the poster child of academics who have traded in their professional integrity for personal gain.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:16 PM
0

The question should be how does society win. The answer to this is proundly complex and the likes of Peterson and other thinkers are probing for a solution. See:- Glich in the Matrix
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:56 PM
14

Yes he would, and she knows that. If she was a man very probably not.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:42 PM
26

This is the thing Jordan Peterson talks about. When men argue there is the threat of violence some where, even if very deep down. This moderates their inteactions most times. With a male/female interaction this threat of violence is taken from the male, women are now taking advantage of this. If this women was male she would have been knocked the fuck out. Social norms need to be re-thought out, we are entering chaos.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:31 PM
1

There is an implication in starting the conversion that there is something flawed about men. There are however about 150+ million men in the USA who are not mass shooters. Your chances of being killed by mass shooting are also minuscule. Projecting the behavior of the most minuscule of percentages of men onto all men is a statistical error. It is similar to suggesting blacks are predisposed to committing crime because of their race.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:25 PM
1

Very interesting. Air Canada will now have at least 2 complaints on there desk for that weekend.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:31 AM
1

The court document looks as if the sentence was suspended. Am I reading it correctly?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:54 PM
8

Only £20,000, WTF! He should have gone to court.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:44 PM
2

The majority of women are rational and have no time for the SJW anti-male shite. This is especially true of the younger generation coming through. I find this uplifting. Women who can think things out for themselves get my applause and support.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 07:10 PM
54

The Men should now ask for equal pay.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 04:46 PM
1

Pressure has taken affect to mold societal norms into the image of SJW's. In short a minority of people are changing our culture. Next will be high school cheerleaders.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 03:18 PM
2

You honestly just saw it as that? If so you are astoundingly naïve.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 07:30 AM
3

Complain like hell, write letters to politicians and the media, protest. Creating a fuss is the only way to stop this.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 09:53 PM
71

Should be a police matter.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 09:58 PM
3

This judgement renders vast numbers of social experiments unethical. Surely he could simple say he was not doing research anyway. It was legitemate political protest.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 04:01 PM
4

Many lawyers give a free half hour consult. The only way to find out is to ask. Have the details of your situation written out before hand. I doubt a cease and desist letter will cost that much.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:38 AM
2

If the police do not investigate the possibility of a false accusation, then the CPS Guidelines mean nothing. I would argue they commonly do not investigate.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:22 AM
1

Great link. Saved.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:49 AM
6

Simply too many points to respond to. It is inadequate as a response.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:43 AM
1

The left protecting the left. What about the untold others who suffered similar fates? What about a criticism of the Metoo witch hunt they fuelled and were part of.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:27 AM
13

Complain to Ofcom:- https://www.ofcom.org.uk/complain-to-ofcom
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:55 AM
1

The note has the odour of saying something meaningful, it actually says very little. A precis would be:- "Blah, blah, blah.... Feminism is for everyone"
/r/MensRights22/07/19 10:22 PM
1

Complaint to DPP might get a review of this sentence.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 04:08 PM
4

Write to your MP, she has misled the house.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:37 PM
8

A simple bit of maths shows if everyone puts the seat to the way they want it, then the duties are equally shared by the genders.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 07:34 AM
2

Academia in general is well past its "best buy" date. What we have today was designed for a 19th century world. The absurd situation of publishing is the result of a duct taping exercise after WW2, to deal with Academia`s massive expansion. Counting publications was the only way of deciding the untold number of grant and job applications. Our world has since changed immeasurable, Academia is structurally inadequate for modern times. Language and culture definitely affects the way we do science. …
/r/MensRights20/07/19 11:25 PM
3

The only way for people to change this type of thing is to complain.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:22 PM
2

Your work on this is very much appreciated.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 11:42 AM
1

The OP is entirely correct. Orwell perfectly described how totalitarian ideologies operate. A Totalitarian regime controls every part of your life including how you think. There is also the changing of language to make some ideas simple to express and others hard or impossible. This is straight out of 1984. Removal of words, eg bitch, bossy, fisherman. Changing of word meanings, eg rape, sexism, gender, patriarchy, misogyny. Addition, or bringing into common usage, of words, eg mansplaining, man…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:12 AM
2

Ray Rice got essentially banned for life.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:18 AM
20

`Manspreading` is a concept invented to keep the feminist mob going, they are running out of causes. As an issue it is straight out of Alinsky's Rules for Radical, rules 6 & 8. The media is ultimately responsible for it having light of day.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:17 AM
1

Mark Latham is a super star. He dares to speak the truth.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 04:09 PM
5

LGBTQWERTY bullies at it again.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:01 AM
3

She openly admits infiltration of the media Change that has only been possible with the involvement of its diverse membership and allies from across the political spectrum, the media, the professions, business and many others.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:26 PM
2

Men have to complain and organise to stop this. Complain to the establishment and government.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:20 AM
1

Illegal in the UK. Cannot discriminate by sex if you are providing a service.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 06:01 AM
2

I downloaded this as soon as I read it 3 days ago.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 04:10 PM
2

Good read. Many ideas for me yet to digest, including your blog link. Much of what I call "Malevolent Feminism" as opposed to "Rational/Egalitarian Feminism", has found its success through word crafting, emotionally satisfying and internally consistent theories and media influence. This type of strategy is difficult to combat , especially when combined with propaganda, proselytising and infiltration of our institutions, eg political, legal and educational. Much of what they are doing is text boo…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:40 PM
1

Wow!
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:43 PM
3

Women volleyball players arguably do not wear shorts :-). I did say "generally".
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:37 PM
23

Woman's Soccer is an up and coming sport that is getting wall to wall media coverage. This is an attempt to establish it as a popular spectator sport on a par with men's club/international sports. This has been tried before and has failed, eg Women's NBA and Ice Hockey. Soccer though is probably the best positioned of women's team sports to achieve this; due to its mass participation, truly international nature and FIFA backing. The reasons people watch and support sports team are very complicat…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:23 PM
3

Complain.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:42 PM
1

This is old school cultural colonialism, ie if they were like us they would be better off. The missionaries in Africa did it 150yrs ago, causing untold cultural damage.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:09 PM
2

In the meantime feminist commentators can say the vilest things they want without sanction.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 02:00 PM
1

Take it to the media.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 08:47 PM
5

I like this point:- The broader point is that humanity is complicated. Millions of men and women make their own choices about which careers, jobs and family structures will work best for them. Who but a committed social engineer could demand that their median pay precisely match?
/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:46 AM
3

Absurd article.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:02 PM
1

These people look like the same old stuff, but disguise themselves using mostly gender neutral language, (probably for funding purposes). Inside their site, HERE, there are phrases that give then away, eg:- "Gender stereotypes are challenged and deconstructed – particularly those of masculinity – supporting boys and men to break these norms. " "49% of boys aged 13 – 14 thought that hitting a partner would be ‘okay’ in at least one of twelve scenarios they were presented with. " I found no negati…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 08:46 PM
2

Fortunately there was a panelist who challenged this point. He challenged the rest of the garbage presented by the other two panelists. Full segment here:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s4sZi8zjzY
/r/MensRights05/07/19 06:22 AM
4

Dogma, myths and lies. Australia has a real problem on its hands. In a decade or so when the dust settles many will be ashamed.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:15 AM
1

The Feminist legal lobby will get law this changed when they see it affects women. The fact they could not have forseen this verifies their idealistic view of women. I can not see why she would marry a guy who is clearly a narcissist. Going ape shit over weights at his age is not a good sign. Looks like they deserved each other.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 07:27 PM
2

Why is the female the model human? Perhaps females should be less emotional. There is millions of years of evolution, evolutionary psychology and testosterone involved here as well
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:32 PM
2

designed to keep men off balance by firing from both sides of the fence. Exactly correct.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:31 PM
1

Another link: https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/20/woman-lied-raped-black-cab-driver-night-10016747/
/r/MensRights25/06/19 10:04 PM
8

Police, that simple.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:50 PM
1

Complain. complain, complain. Letters to the school, education department and media. Get parents to help
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:38 PM
5

Wage slavery should be an MRA issue. If you do not talk about it, nothing happens. Argument by repetition is a powerful political tool.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:24 PM
4

"cheeky" has become a code word for vile behaviour that is SJW sanctioned as OK.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 03:38 AM
11

A complete load of garbage, they treat their readers like morons. It used to be the flagship Canadian publication wielding power and influence. The internet has thankfully pretty much rendered it meaningless. The days of the Toronto elite driving public opinion are also thankfully gone. They are struggling and are now trying to hit a target SJW audience. The fact they are peddling this intellectually thin bullshit is a testament to their lack of journalistic ethics, and the retardedness of their…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 03:36 AM
2

Keep up the good work. Ty for update.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:21 PM
3

Wow, an amazing piece of work. Well done! The most impressive post I have ever read on reddit.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:19 PM
1

But has been said above the article was used to piggy back other ideas. I lost all trust in their intentions years ago.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:53 PM
3

Usual Guardian garbage.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:29 PM
2

Super Ad!
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:00 PM
1

They are thin on detail about "The gendered nature" of DV. The "The gendered nature" phrase is creeping into our legislation all over the place. It is a phrase used to implement female centric legislation, and yet the latest invention of the Feminist lobby. Beware of this phrase, some animals are becoming way more equal than others. It is even more dangerous than phrases like "toxic masculinity". This phrase needs to be a focus for the MRA.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:24 AM
2

Have they nabbed the milk shaker or photographer yet. How is that case continuing.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:12 AM
6

Complain.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 09:06 PM
1

"a lot of dudes in this sub have no idea how crappy we get treated by a lot of men" You clearly have no idea how a lot women can treat men. You need to read Norah Vincent's book; she lived as man for 18 months.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 02:46 PM
1

They are tying to rebrand. Tigers rarely change their stripes
/r/MensRights20/06/19 02:38 PM
64

This needs to stop. Feminist invasion of male space has now extended to the washrooms. This needs to be added to the list of men's issues.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 02:06 PM
1

Make sure you are armed with facts, eg suicide rates, life expectancy, work place deaths etc.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:35 PM
8

The people doing this should be named, shamed and sued.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 06:14 PM
5

The article does not mention the rate for boys is 3 times higher. Switch the numbers and there would be a national emergency.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:57 PM
1

Candace Owens is a super star. The woman is amazingly smart.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:49 PM
30

You are not wrong. The guy was looking for an excuse to hit a samller kid. He should be in hand cuffs.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:09 PM
33

American Universities are changing into Chinese Universities, ie over policed high schools. Anyone who has worked in China knows what I mean.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:35 PM
1

Believe me, letters have an effect.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:46 AM
1

Simply put, you have to get used to rejection. Live with it and own it, get used it you are not special. Very few men can get a girl friend easily. I got rejected all the time but did not give a fuck. The sheer force of probability approach works, eventually someone will say yes. The main fear should be what the fuck do I do next if she says yes. I am happy to say I am a successfully breeding male. Watch a few of these channels for inspiration:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnqTxqBfmZE https:…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:45 AM
1

Send this to your old school.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:10 AM
2

"I think the part about women being discouraged from showing affection in the 1950s was interesting and correct. It's around the section (10-15m) where mothers were blamed for schizophrenia, autism, etc., was interesting as well." And now men are blamed for just about everything. Fact this is on the BBC is an improvement.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:08 PM
6

Started off interesting then descended into the same old narrative.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 07:35 PM
7

The actual text of the article is worse than the post title. The OP has been kind. The relevant section is the last page and gives a window into her elitist, sexist, bigoted mind.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 05:59 PM
2

Here are some more, it is not usually men who say this:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suOPz-rRSxg Image the consequences if a female politician was refered to in this way.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 05:17 PM
1

Men really need to start complaining big time about this.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:45 PM
3

Ocasio-Cortez using gendered insults? Perhaps she should be less "bossy"?
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:43 PM
2

This is where social contruction does in fact apply. Babies and young children do not have a disgust reponse. That is why they will put shit in their mouths, both literally and metephorically. Disgust is aquired from the culture by the age of about 8. This also explains why Westerners will not eat dogs but some Eastern cultures will. Murder in fiction is result of the retelling of war stories. The killing of bad people in fiction, ie the enemy, normalises the activity in real life. It is in fact…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:11 PM
8

At present time of posting:- r/mensrights :- 221k Members 668 Online r/feminism:- 139k Members 169 Online
/r/MensRights09/06/19 07:43 PM
10

It is not entirely clear who these people are. From their site:- We challenge boring male stereotypes and encourage positive behavioural change and help-seeking behaviour, using cultural touch points like art, music, sport and comedy. Edit: Based on the replies, as I thought, this is Toxic Mascuinity "Lite", ie a Trojan Horse.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 09:22 PM
1

This type of behavior is probably on a bell curve, with more women than men prone to it. I have encountered guys who are prone to this type of shit. Guys are better dealing with it due to the dynamic between men, ie an underlying threat of violence. This dynamic is probably also responsible for back stabbing and toxic scheming being far less common among men.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:10 PM
3

Keep up the pressure on these demagogues, do not let this case drop.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:49 PM
2

This guy speaks the truth and is a hero.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:42 PM
1

More detailed account:- https://www.wesh.com/article/man-in-critical-condition-after-being-attacked-near-restaurant-officials-say/27771270
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:29 PM
1

The argument for less legal protection is usually along the lines of :- Since women so infrequently lie about rape and sexual assault then limiting legal protection for men will cause little societal harm. It is a utilitarian argument that is a variant of the Prosecutors Fallacy, it is also odds with some of the most fundamental principles of justice. It is also based on flawed or unknown statistical facts.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:10 PM
3

His virtue signalling has now become idiot signalling. He is paying protection money to the Feminist Mafia.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:54 PM
1

Articulate and thoughtful guy.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:27 PM
1

Best headline I have read in a long time.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:01 PM
1

Cambridge has forgotten what its purpose is.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:59 PM
2

The hypocrisy and contradictions are suffocating.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:56 PM
1

Academia is rotten to its core and past its best buy date. In a few years it will be seen as an anachronism.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:55 PM
7

The very first paragraph tells you immediately that the program is to stop "WrongThink".
/r/MensRights03/06/19 04:28 PM
16

These thugs are no different from the Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany. This is not common pub violence, this is political violence. If they identify even more people and push the incident through the media, the police will be forced to act. Also, this a really well produced video. The group psychology here is no different to soccer thugs attacking members of the opposite team.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 04:09 PM
9

The actual article is here. The whole interview reads like something you'd expect from a televangelist.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:22 PM
2

Male formal and informal institutions have been systematically attacked and destroyed, now government action is required to create bread crumbs of what was there before.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:51 PM
1

Whatever way you juggle the numbers it is appalling.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:56 PM
1

Drawing penises in their mouths got the murals taken down in the other place.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 05:53 AM
4

This has idea had has been stirred up by the political left, to create division in society.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:38 PM
10

Complain.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:36 PM
2

That type of speech should not be tolerated. I would have walked out of the studio.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:35 PM
1

Good for her!
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:26 PM
5

Wow, I was unaware of this book. The book needs to be "re-discovered" and popularised. It should be required reading in gender studies.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 06:06 PM
6

So this is Cambridge University, apparently one of the most prestigious universities in the world. The behaviour of the "The Varsity" newspaper is very serious. Make sure both the woman and the newspaper are pursued relentlessly. The Varsity is an entirely independent newspaper. It has a board of prestigious people and relies heavily on advertising. It claims to follow the IPSO guidelines, though is not a member. It also has a formal complaint procedure.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:00 PM
1

This is a symptom of something very rotten going on in our society, that is going unchecked.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:19 PM
2

You should apply and request admission. My bet they will accept you. Applying and being turned down also allows you to claim harm. Put effort into your application. Being from a lower socio-economic class will aid your case.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:50 AM
2

You are true on both counts from what I can tell. Also I agree, rationality has little to do with anything anymore.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 10:24 PM
1

It is the Guardian, enough said.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:36 PM
5

This is a magnificent essay, well researched and thought out. It should be converted into a book. I wish I could have been there. Well done Elizabeth, you work is impressive and important.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 04:13 AM
1

1st world problems?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 04:03 PM
2

Predict 20hrs community service.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 04:01 PM
1

But surely this type of crime is "extremely rare" and prosecuting her would discourage from others coming forward.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:57 PM
1

Good grief!
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:14 PM
9

Trust the NAACP to spin this as a race issue alone.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:15 AM
1

Tell her you feel you are being indoctrinated not educated then go to the headmaster. Make the suggestion you will speak to the media. International Women's Day presently has political overtones. You should not be punished for legitimate protest.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:25 PM
1

Relevant :-) Great video.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 08:21 PM
5

"Student Initiative" - what an insidious lot these people are.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 08:19 PM
3

This is horrible.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:45 AM
1

She is not concerned about companies that pay women more than men?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:15 PM
2

They could focus traumatised boys, not because of gender equality but because they are traumatised.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:22 PM
2

Mug Shot.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:21 PM
1

The post is probably fake.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:25 PM
2

Biden has too much baggage, eg Creepy Joe and Anita Hill issues. In the present political climate he will be ripped apart.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:15 PM
1

Canada under Trudeau is going to shite and frankly so is academia world wide. Academia is past its 'best buy date', and when government interferes it will go rancid even faster. The general public does not have weaponised language at hand to counter this ideological clap trap, but understand what is going on. They will vote pretty boy Trudeau out next election. It is a well written and argued article.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:10 PM
12

I keep harping on about this, but these articles are straight out of "1984" and "Brave New World", both in the reporting and that being reported. We really do live in a Red/Blue Pill world. The fact that "educated" people read this shite uncritically, is a testament to the irrationality of vast swathes the human species. What I read there was awash was critical thinking errors and faith based premises, worthy of an introductory book on informal fallacies. In other words bullshit. I find it distu…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:22 PM
11

Your are correct, but "Pushing for equality for women" is usually a euphemism for something quite different. The statement "nobody hates men" is clearly false.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:49 PM
1

Presenting themselves as the victim again.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:29 PM
3

There are no words to describe how utterly awful this woman is.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:19 PM
1

Hewitt is a Sociopath with a big streak of Machiavalism. She is a disgusting human being.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:16 PM
2

So her husband, Dave Bugliari, has become an Incel?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:50 PM
1

She sounds like a Russian Grand Duchess complaining about the price of caviar and the dearth of good man servants. It is this really a social issue of national importance?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 03:02 PM
1

If you adjust the seat to the way you want it, if necessary, then the putting the seat up or down is evenly distributed between the sexes. That is the way the maths works out. Falling down the toilet in the middle of the night was the only argument the women in my family could muster
/r/MensRights11/05/19 02:52 PM
1

The political elite do not want to disturb the social structure from which they benefit, ie male wage slavery, which is the back bone of the economic system. Paternity leave is payed lip service to periodically to keep criticism down. It could have been substantially put in place decades ago.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:32 AM
1

Excellent article and post, this is a significant issue. The working class has been forgotten, particularly the white working class. I don't see excruciating analysis of the lives and treatment of this demographic by academia or the supposedly 'left wing' media. Corbyn in so many words has declared his disinterest in them. Their position in society has returned to the pre-union days of the industrial revolution. Keir Hardy is turning in his grave. Governments do the bare minimum to keep the work…
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:39 PM
1

Does this report abide by the recent press guidelines? LINK
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:08 PM
6

The guidelines, set out by feminist organisation Level Up, instruct journalists how to report on domestic abuse in the safest and most sensitive way possible. They were written by a coalition of academics, survivors’ families and representatives from domestic violence charities So the media is not controlled by feminist forces?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 04:11 PM
1

Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance - Albert Maysles.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:03 PM
4

These men are heroes.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:14 PM
4

The political atmosphere is too highly charged atm, prosecutors will not touch this one. The article is just another piece of Guardian Garbage.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:05 PM
6

There is also a huge dollop of evolutionary psychology going on here. Women are more attracted to successful males, for obvious reasons. Males have had an evolutionary pressure to succeed and accumulate wealth. Also before any discussion of Patriarchy can begin it should be properly defined. Then determined to what extent it has actually existed. Framing is everything, don't get caught in argument frames built around a forgone conclusion.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:33 PM
31

No post realease help was given to this guy .. wtf.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:53 PM
23

Title IX, Title IX , Title IX... COMPLAIN
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:46 PM
9

Just horrific and only one media outlet cared.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 03:30 PM
10

Vast swathes of feminist rhetoric are simply self serving re-framing. Cups of water are either half full or half empty as required. A list should be compiled, here is a start:- Stay at home mother -> Sacrificed her career. Female advantages -> Benign Sexism. Male only conscription -> Discrimination against women.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 12:34 PM
2

Very perfunctory coverage so as to parry any criticism. The Mayors comments are beyond disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:52 PM
1

Winnipeg.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:50 PM
4

There will be eventually riots. The Spanish historically have shown they will only take so much shit.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:46 PM
1

Some people.. At any given time, some people are complaining about something. Though only "some people" gain the attention of the BBC. In this case the 'some people' are the usual activist crowd, despite the grassroots like spin the BBC gives to the story.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 06:57 AM
2

This is new age neo-colonialism. The article itself is abject propaganda.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 06:50 AM
10

There are 100 circumcision related deaths in the USA every year. LINK
/r/MensRights04/05/19 06:43 AM
1

Don't let the Cultural Marxists change our language, it is Orwellian. 40yrs ago rape had many diverse meanings, primarily "to take away or despoil". Changing the language limits thoughts and arguments.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 05:03 PM
2

Sexual offense. I think a complain to the DPP will trigger it being re-looked at. The prosecutors should appeal the decision.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 02:41 PM
3

Justin 'The Groper' Trudeau.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:48 PM
2

Australian politics in a very dark period. Best of luck to you down under.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:42 PM
1

The man in fourth place beat her and gets no money. It would discrimination if she got money.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:26 PM
1

Shows if you complain in numbers results happen
/r/MensRights26/04/19 06:04 PM
1

Clearly the males need to formally complain. If you can post on Reddit you can write a discrimination complaint.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 07:26 PM
6

"Women not being required to register is discrimination against women" - WTF?!
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:00 PM
7

"Handlers" - like something from Orwell's 1984 "Reality is designed by men to control women" - defnitely like something from Orwell's 1984
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:19 PM
7

Creepy Joe's antics will be buried by the mainstream media. A few rules from Rules for Radicals:- "Keep the pressure on." "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."
/r/MensRights23/04/19 06:05 PM
7

My thoughts are with you. I deal with people with BPD from time to time, it is a terrble, terrible thing for those around them. Both men and women need to be alerted to the serious dangers of being married to some one with a Borderline Personality. Borderline women are often very sexual and can initially be attractive, until their full personality comes out. I have witnessed incredible levels of relentless vindictiveness with some of them.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 05:46 PM
3

Publicise the names of the workshop organisers and the officers of the students union. Let the Internet record them for posterity.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 05:32 PM
5

Feminists parrot the phrase "brave strong women" about women who repeat dogma to receptive audiences. These women actually are brave and strong.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:28 PM
2

And so the truth begins to come out.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 07:11 PM
4

Very interesting video. Too many of these debates has been at a superficial level involving dogmatic slogans and the media pushing the narrative. This level of analysis is refreshing.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 06:40 PM
1

Forced labor for males only. The UK is a signatory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_Labour_Convention Article 11 of the Convention states that forced or compulsory labour may be imposed only upon "adult able-bodied males who are of an apparent age of not less than 18 and not more than 45 years".
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:10 AM
2

Why are men under represented in Psychology, Sociology, Biology, Nursing, Teaching, Tertiary Education.....?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 07:04 PM
2

Exactly! Much of feminist propaganda, and in propaganda general, is about framing and repititon. Calling them out every time they try these slight of hands is crucial to combatting their shite.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:28 PM
5

Don't buy the "Crocodile Dundee" myth about Australia. Australia is not a land of buccaneers who throw caution to the wind. Australia has a big problem on its hands, feminist ideology has infected its institutions and is rotting the place from the inside. Notable standouts are Senators David Leyonhjelm and Pauline Hanson and few more, They deserve our support.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:21 PM
8

Don't bother wasting any emotional energy on Wikipedia. The Mens Rights page is controlled by feminsts, both male and female, and a glimpse into the world we would live if they gained control.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:13 PM
31

How many more of these stories are there? Relevant article:- Circumcision Deaths
/r/MensRights17/04/19 04:12 PM
2

This post has an MRM and gender issues flavor about it. It is a legitimate post here.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:14 PM
5

Market forces will reduce this to the same league as obscure art theater.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:23 PM
3

Mainsplaining and Manspreading are contrived issues to keep the "battle" going. They are straight out of Alinksy's Rules for Radicals (rules 5,6,8,10,13). The MRM needs to read Alinksy's Rules, it is required reading for political strategists. Shrillary did her undergrad thesis on them.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:06 PM
2

Has a complaint been lodged against this woman?
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:01 PM
9

Wales has been heading down this hell hole for a while. Womens Aid Wales is an appalling group of bigots, the worst in the country. The arguments given by Carwyn Jones are mind bogglingly ill informed and self serving. He is a disgusting man. A Welsh Legislature was created without an existing political class, or culture, of regional politics at that level. This has resulted in groups of squeaky wheeled nut jobs back stabbing their way to power. It is like bloody Iraq. It will take a generation …
/r/MensRights16/04/19 03:01 PM
2

What if A is a transgender female with a penis? Looks like it is not rape.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 01:48 PM
22

The mainstream media will not say a thing about this. She is so bigoted she is self righteously unaware of it. It looks like the now Dems have lost the divorced dad vote. Just as they lost a large chunk of the black male vote through hubby's comments.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:18 AM
2

This proposed law will not pass. It opens a legal can of worms that SJW's will not want.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:13 AM
5

This puzzles me. In Canada, full professors salaries are worked out by a formula, I can not see how gender would enter into it. Initial salaries are also worked by a formula based on years of experience elsewhere, there is little wiggle room for negotiation. If you are promoted in-house to full professor, which most are, any initial negotiation advantages are almost always removed by promotion to the higher rank pay scale. The only explanation for this is that the world has gone mad. The fact th…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:46 PM
7

This is stealth Cultural Marxism. Our cultural values are embedded in children's stories. Reading stories to children is an important way of transmitting these values. If you want to attack a culture, attacking its stories is a good place to start.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:20 PM
2

The media also kept this detail about the Evans trial very quiet.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:09 AM
2

If you do not agree with me it is hate speech. You should be shunned and silenced. This type of argument has been used in different forms through out time, eg Stalinist Russia, McCarthyist USA, Nazi Germany, Cultural Revolution and The Inquisition. The only difference is one of framing and exact wording. We are witnessing a nascent Totalitarianism
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:59 PM
12

"Following the unlawful disclosure of the complainant’s name on social media two witnesses came forward providing information regarding the complainant’s sexual history which formed the ‘new evidence’ to push forward for an appeal. " This is an argument against anonymity of victims accusers. The same argument used against the anonymity of the accused.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:28 PM
1

Virtue signalling.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:22 PM
2

Two ways to resolve this: Define what a hate group is, in an objective and honest way. Define what the MRM is. Demonstrate the MRM satisfies the first criterion. This is not possible. Label and smear the MRM. Case proved.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 06:28 PM
1

The guy was arrested and charged just on her word. Did they not look at any evidence first?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:03 PM
2

All of this comes from Social Conflict Theory. It is a result of people taking too many Sociology classes, reading too much Karl Marx and having too much time on their hands, (eg Donna Zuckerberg). In essence thay are trying to force a soft Cultural Revolution, one of the most calamatous events of the 20th century. Social Conflict Theory in essence says the less privileged classes will grab power from the privileged classes. Over time a new less privileged class will emerge and the cycle will re…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 05:02 PM
5

Excellent comment.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 06:11 PM
1

So much for Blackstones's Rule.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:41 PM
6

I can not begin to imagine the grief parents would feel at the loss of a child like this. Such a senseless loss of life. (~100 baby boys per year die in the USA from circumcision related causes.)
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:21 PM
4

Orwell is turning in his grave. NPR is a political mouth peice of the worst of the PC brigade. The fact it recieves public funding repulses me.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:13 PM
1

Yet another piece of Time Magazine propaganda. I am disappointed that the ovewhelming majority of young men don't think the Pay Gap is made up. ​
/r/MensRights04/04/19 07:04 PM
1

There are analogies with the Chinese Cultural Revolution here. I seriously recommend people go onto Youtube and learn about it.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:05 AM
19

There are more deaths from MGM than FGM in the West, approximately 100 circumcision related deaths in the USA annually
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:00 PM
1

"That included video footage of the sexual encounters on June 15, 2015 which proved they were consensual" Why the hell was she not charged with a false rape accusation?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 08:44 PM
3

Where were the parents is a very pertinent question. If this happened to a boy of mine I would have gone ape shit and advised them on how to effectively counter protest. ​
/r/MensRights28/03/19 06:39 PM
8

We are experiencing an extreme period of Cultural Hegemony, which is rightly likened to the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Identifying this enables right minded people to combat it. This story is so awful I thought it was fiction. It puzzles me why a boy did not stand up in the meeting and call this out for what it was. I can assure you he would have gone to the top of the girls' list of boys, which I have no doubt exists. These girls were armed with weaponised language developed by legions of aca…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:29 PM
3

" Please be assured that impartiality is a core value of the BBC " Bullshit, Bullshit, Bullshit......
/r/MensRights26/03/19 11:51 PM
1

Yes. ​
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:11 PM
11

There is a pattern here. Lets not forget the husband beating Labour domestic violence minister Sarah Champion (the irony is on a galactic scale). LINK
/r/MensRights25/03/19 01:41 PM
1

Mind boggling.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:03 PM
1

The media are framing it as poor white boys failing, the reality is that boys as a group are failing. Make no mistake, if the statistics were the other way around for the genders it would be girls failing as a group. There would a national emergency.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:14 PM
1

Womansplaining?
/r/MensRights19/03/19 09:18 PM
1

Brilliant video though there is way more to be said about this snake oil salesman. Defining Judith Butler as the Bernie Maddoff of academia is breathtakingly accurate and wonderful. I still do not know what 'Paleonimic' means though, lol.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 05:18 PM
6

I bet you any male "fare dogers" would not be prosecuted. They would be concerned of the blow back.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 07:24 PM
5

Governments will do all they can to discourage this as it changes the structure of society. Modern Society relies on pair bonds because it keeps the men in the work force. This pays for the raising of children, increases the size of the labour force and keep men occupied (ie not plotting revolution). Male wage slavery is the backbone of modernity, and if feminists have their way. so will female wage slavery. ​ This begs the question of how this women is paying to raise her children? Judging by t…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:28 PM
3

Borderline and Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:06 PM
1

Jordan Peterson's views on the APA's guidelines are worth reading, LINK.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:03 PM
1

We need more commentators like this.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 07:12 PM
4

"Motte and Bailey" has a close cousin "Bait and switch". (Great site for Fallacies)
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:15 PM
4

The reporter is Libby Wiener, how appropos.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:40 PM
23

Probably illegal, it should be challenged.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:09 PM
2

Other wonderful articles on the site include:- Couple having sex outdoors in Bigfoot costumes gets accidentally shot by hunters Babysitter transported to hospital after inserting a baby in her vagina Morgue employee cremated by mistake while taking a nap Morgue worker arrested after giving birth to a dead man’s baby
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:49 PM
1

It is money for the Old Girls Club. It is on a par with any 3rd world corruption.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:37 PM
1

About time too. Women's hour has been a decades long propaganda outlet.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 05:16 PM
1

Orwellian.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:08 PM
1

The recent debate on washroom arrangements is a relatively trivial first world problem whipped up by some to maintain a political agenda and their relevance. (see Saul Alinsky RfR : Rules 6, 8 & 13). Social norms are a mixture of pragmatism and arbitrariness, ie we agree on something that works reasonably well so we can get on with life. There is often no rhyme nor reason why we settled on a particular norm apart from it having an element of utility and consistency with other norms. This is why …
/r/MensRights03/03/19 09:42 PM
6

The "Gender Pay Gap" issue is a ruse to keep the dimming torch of feminism burning.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:27 PM
2

I don't think the article played down the abuse of boys.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:39 PM
2

Winchester University has been flim-flammed by people who wish to censor those who disagree with them. Shame on them for bowing down to bullies. Buchanan should hold the talk off campus with a fan fare of publicity.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 08:54 PM
16

Utterly appalling and a nascent "Cultural Revolution" nipped in the bud. History will look back at these times in disgust. It bothers me to think of how many of these cases have not made it to court. Young men from impoverished backgrounds are screwed.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:48 PM
1

If men do not suffer "institutional sexism" then surely they are suffering "benevolent sexism".
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:29 PM
3

Mental problems, probably the beginnings of bi-polar or schizophrenia. Imagine being married to that.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 09:59 PM
2

Looks like she got defeated by a 'White Boy' some years back and has never forgiven him, LINK.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:11 AM
1

Sounds a bit like the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Next they will put all the advice in a little 'Red Book' and hand it out
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:46 AM
1

“our goal is to hire the best, male or female, we are moving away from binary identity.” WTF?
/r/MensRights08/02/19 03:13 AM
2

Her acceptance by the media is repulsive.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:17 AM
1

I even question the wording of the title of the APA guidelines. It is actually, LINK, "APA GUIDELINES for Psychological Practice with Boys and Men" not Men and Boys?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 09:04 PM
13

The different reaction of the police to men and women is so true.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:00 PM
27

The questions are about #Metoo. I do not trust the Guardian one inch.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:10 PM
1

Many BDSM commnities I am aware of have more women in them than men. Finding men can be a problem.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:29 PM
2

The page is controlled by feminist editors and admins, don't even think about wasting your time.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 07:49 PM
2

The letter accurately sums up this insidious organisation. The main points of the letter should be added to their Wikipedia site.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:26 PM
1

Who informs this women about the world around her? I doubt her world view is due to independent inquiry on here own part. She has been kept ignorant by her advisors. There is systemic problem in our institutions.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:00 PM
2

I suggest you re-read my first sentence.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:53 AM
2

Bullshit, appealing to the literal meaning of definitions and words whilst denying the emotion weight they carry is intellectual dishonestly at its finest. The concept and its wording are not just provocative, they are vile. It is an in your face attack on men. It is raw demonstration of power and a "look at the shit we can get away with". If you can get people to believe absurd things you can get them to believe and do anything. (ty Rousseau ) Unless this shite is shut down even worse is coming…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:54 PM
1

Anything citing Kimmel or Flood is by defintion garbage. This is an intrusion into peoples lives of the likes that defines Totalitarianism. The whole document reads like a trick of language and framing.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:51 PM
14

My wife had no interest in doing our daughters' hair. I taught myself how to do it, as have many other men. Not all women like or can do this type of stuff.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:00 PM
11

This woman is poisonous and has been suspended before:- https://www.pressherald.com/2018/08/17/disciplined-doctor-clashed-with-patients-over-trump/ Intactivism groups should protest outside her office. ​
/r/MensRights06/01/19 03:43 PM
36

Writing a letter of complaint and CC'ing her still has an affect.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 03:42 PM
1

It probably was in the 1960's, till there was a move to become strident and pursue '#MeToo" like issues.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:21 PM
3

Fabulous video, well done Jess Butcher.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:01 AM
1

A Kafkaesque nightmare but all too common these days.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:29 PM
4

This video is an introduction to this article.:- https://areomagazine.com/2018/12/18/postmodern-religion-and-the-faith-of-social-justice/
/r/MensRights28/12/18 04:41 AM
1

This type of language has taken over the social sciences, it is pretentious and unnecessary. After de-coding the gibberish there is in fact a point being made. I think she is saying we should recatergorise the objects in our world so it is easier for her shove her political ideology down our throat.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:43 PM
1

This is a reaction to the Ghomesi case. LINK.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:11 PM
3

Define 'Equality' and then justify it is a good thing, given the complexity of the human condition. The response is always circular and is that equality is by defnition good. This is a mind boggling awful article and history will laugh at us. ​
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:31 PM
2

Great article. Discussion of contemporary issues is beginning to get beyond the superficial hive mentality presently dominating debate
/r/MensRights16/12/18 02:47 AM
2

This video is well worth listening to.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 11:33 PM
2

Countless people are killed in car accidents, perhaps we should ban driving.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 09:10 PM
2

Davis is a true hero.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 08:14 PM
2

"The report claims that all-female crews would be the best option, as women work better as a team, and are less likely than men to fight over who is the leader. " ROTFL
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:44 PM
51

Kirsten Gillibrand - Born into privilege and has lived a life of unbridled privilege. She has no understanding of the lives ordinary people live.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:26 PM
2

Edited the image a bit. https://imgur.com/a/kfSp5ga
/r/MensRights04/12/18 06:07 AM
33

Why? Female only water fountains next? Lesson from history? ​
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:40 PM
5

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:07 PM
3

Divide and Conquer for political power.:- Hitler - The Jews Lenin - The Bourgeoisie MacCarthy - The Communists Milosevich - The Bosnian and Kosovans and now... Australian Labour - College Age Males.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:00 PM
1

You are correct the speaker is a whack job, but what he says is not.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:36 AM
4

There is more being said here than meets the eye. This commentary exposes the tip of an iceberg.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:46 PM
4

Because of their Womens Studies degrees, there are people driving social policy who are inumerate. They do not know how to interpret numbers. The Pay-Gap will be recorded as the most intellectually dishonest and contrived political issue in history.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 06:06 PM
1

This is White Knighting on a galactic scale and the author's Rule 6 is equally ironic. I am guessing the guy has dominatrix fantasies.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:02 PM
10

He is quoting Blackstone's Principle which is a cornerstone of our justice system.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 04:09 PM
1

Has been reposted many times, but I never fail to enjoy watching this classic.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 09:01 PM
4

Univeristy of Manitoba Education Dept has a allocated spots for anyone who is not a striaght white male.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 08:04 PM
1

Satire site. ​
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:49 AM
1

Dragons and Goblins as concepts exist but in reality do not exist. Language manipulators create words to 'create' things that do not actually exist. 'Objectifcation' is such a word. If you create a word for something, and repeat the word frequently, then people will start to see it everywhere even if it not there. This is propaganda 101. All this SJW nonsense is mostly a battle of language.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 09:28 PM
-1

'Objectification' is a made up word for something that does not exist. I give the language manipulators of this world as little credence as I can by hardly ever using the word. Creating a word for a non-existent concept does not make it exist.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:11 AM
2

Wikipedia has out done itself here, even by their rock bottom standards. I refuse to waste anymore emotional energy on that abomination.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:50 AM
1

White Ribbon preaching respect to others is ironic.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 09:53 PM
1

If the West become a matriarchy China and Russia will conquer it in seconds.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:26 PM
18

Revolting people and they are paid by us. Their reponse is revolting.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 08:09 PM
6

"Ridiculing or sometimes toxifying masculinity and ignoring male issues is not the way forward." This is fantastic use of language.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 05:00 PM
3

Has there been a debate this year?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:38 PM
5

Utterly vile woman.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:58 PM
1

Lobby the speakers of the conference. Activism works both ways.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 03:36 AM
2

Simple minded dogma. This man's opinion is worthless.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:29 PM
1

Kafkaesque and fraught with obvious problems and contradictions.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 11:10 PM
8

These guys are heroes. ​
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:29 PM
6

They have changed the headline. They are little rats, so much for integrity in journalism. Their headlines are click bait for outrage junkies of the middle class left.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 08:32 PM
1

The problem with the Australian DV movement is that it is not about DV, it is about power.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:39 PM
2

A true classic. The smile on his face is priceless. :-) ​
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:49 PM
18

In the past the media has ignored the likes of Jordan Peterson so they can control the narrative. The Internet has meant that Jordan Peterson can not be ignored. These people are out of their depth intellectually.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 05:33 AM
3

No different to the Taliban and ISIS destroying ancient statues.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 07:58 PM
6

BBC - British Bullshit Corporation
/r/MensRights24/10/18 08:35 PM
1

BBC - British Bullshit Corporation
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:32 PM
3

Don't waste any emotional enrgy on Wikipedia. It controlled by legions of ideologues.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:09 PM
9

The same mechanisms here are involved in some DV.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:49 PM
1

Making Misandry a hate crime would defang feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 12:28 AM
2

Posters expressing contrary notions would be openly pulled up and destroyed. This is our univeristies today.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 03:42 PM
1

This hateful woman has made a tactical error and she knows it. 'Misandry' is far more prevalent than 'Misogony', just read the Guardian for instance. Making 'Misandry' a hate crime would defang large swathes of the feminist movement in the UK.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:56 PM
19

Complain to your Education Board. Complaining works, especially in numbers. Your story is sadly too common.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:39 PM
1

What makes a man become who he is complex, nuanced and deeply affected by the forces of evolutionary psychology (i.e. sex). If you manage to implement:- "What the Men's Project is trying to achieve is to allow people to be themselves, and not feeling that they have to be any which way," then men will end up pretty much as they are now. However, this project is disingenuous, it is trying to define ideologically what men should be. History shows us that simple minded models of society that fit on …
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:58 AM
1

Oddly, exactly the same happened to me today. A young woman's back pack brushed against my backside, it really does feel like someone is touching you up.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:01 PM
2

The premise here is largely correct, but many women also do not do this.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:58 PM
3

Orwellian.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:00 PM
3

They sound like Russian Grand Duchesses complaining about the price of caviar and man servants.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 04:49 PM
5

Framed as a race issue when it clearly is not.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 02:44 AM
2

Intellectually thin and a strawman.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:48 PM
1

Academia at its 'finest'. Tricks of language and framing do not constitute research.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:43 PM
0

The reason you'd need a book to fully describe your thoughts, is because our language has been manipulated to make unpopular idea difficult to express. Chomsky speaks about this. Wikipedia is awash with 'academic' references of the nature described here. Opinion becomes fact, even if published in a 3rd rate conference proceedings.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:27 PM
1

The Senate Committee was worth watching.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:15 PM
19

1,600 people who would have had Galileo's head on the block.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:21 PM
16

I work in the field and can confirm you are exactly correct.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:21 PM
1

Boy's problems are always framed as a problem of a sub-demographic, so as to reduce the public reaction and divert attention from the larger issue.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 04:32 PM
1

Stereotypical 3rd rate white knight. Trying to impress.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:50 AM
1

Cuckolding then also should be seen as DV.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:33 PM
2

This Emke character seems like a low level developer who has a history in web languages, which can be taught to children. I see why (s)he despises meritocracy.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:34 PM
1

"University of Pisa to initiate an ethical proceeding against Prof. Strumia." ROTFL, Galileo was born in Pisa. The irony is jaw dropping.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:59 PM
2

I thought we had learnt the lesson of Galileo 400+ years ago?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 08:55 PM
3

Ann Widdecombe is a treasure.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:56 AM
10

Katy Kay has lived in a gilded cage all her life. She has no concept of the world the majority of us live in. Her opinion on any social issue is worthless.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:31 PM
4

1984, Brave New World, Soviet Russia, Cultural Revolution and Fascist State are phrases that come to mind. No more need be said.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:25 PM
3

AHRQ should be de-funded till it gets it shit together and stop with the propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:26 PM
5

Nasty, nasty propaganda; old fashioned label and smear. Hollywood has been at this since it started. Chomsky and Hermann have written much on this.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:13 PM
1

Meanwhile the poor are living in deperate circumstances in France. This a distraction from France's real troubles. So much for French Socialism, they have abandoned the working class and poor.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:02 PM
2

Great video, she is a very clear thinker.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:20 PM
1

Women's Issues => Black and white, Discrimination and Patriarchy. Men's Issues => Nuance and complex explanations to excuse away.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:58 AM
2

> The process is supposed to be educational, not legal, according to the letter. This is Orwellian on steroids.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:03 PM
1

The Michigan Womens Music festival was the first major women only festival. It is now defunct.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 05:30 PM
3

I had not heard of Helen Pluckrose before, her synopsis of contemporary post modernism is brilliant.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 08:54 PM
1

Two thoughts come to mind:- Galileo Streisand Effect EDIT: Apparently mathematics has a habit of doing this type of thing LINK.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:37 PM
2

DeVos is a hero.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:51 PM
14

You should have taken your essay on men to the school board and complain.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:50 PM
1

Much as people have analysed these hysterias, I think we still do not fundamentally understand how they gain traction, else we could stop them. Institutional responses to them are consistently pathetic and at odds with fundamental principles they supposedly support. I still must read more on the issue. ​ As part of my job i have been involved with a number of cases similar to those described in the article. The common thread has been:- An institution fearful of bad publicly. Accusers with mental…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:15 PM
1

All too familiar a story. In years to come this era with be likened to McCarthyism. Despite the jaw dropping repetition of history, institutions seem unable/unwillingly to identify and stop these witch hunts. The mechanisms that allow to happen are worth of study in of themselves.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:14 PM
1

Believe the victim has now turned into believe women? To quote from last paragraph:- > The fact that we believe the word of women is something we can’t go back on.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 02:39 PM
4

This quote sums up the root of the problem:- “Start with an alcohol-soaked set of facts that no state’s criminal law would consider sexual assault. Add an incomplete ‘investigation,’ unfair procedures, and a disciplinary panel uninterested in evidence of innocence. Stir in a de facto presumption of guilt based on misguided Obama administration dictates, ideological zeal, and fear of bad publicity.”
/r/MensRights02/09/18 02:22 PM
3

Yet sadly today we continue to ignore the plight of Abotiginal men as the narrative has to be maintained.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:04 PM
6

The media screams about "fake news", yet their reporting on this event was text book fake news. Sadly, the big lie really does work.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:29 PM
4

The place is an abomination and was from its inception. https://calendar.uoregon.edu/group/uo_mens_center
/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:17 AM
2

The visitation agreement has to go back to court for reconsideration.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:36 PM
2

Lol, so much for the "Believe the Victim " principle.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 07:51 PM
2

Academia lost its bearings decades ago, it is now floundering onto the rocks. Univeristies and academics are past their best by date and will be a thing of the past in 50yrs or so. A new way of socially organising to investigate the fundemental questions of our world will emerge.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 03:58 PM
1

In recent modern times, male anti-social behaviour has been criminalised as it is more often a threat to those in power. When the village was the main unit of ones existence, reputation destruction was more of a threat to social order than today; thus resulting in the use of the muzzle and ducking stool.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:02 PM
1

Buzzfeed is trying to normalise the non-prosecution of false rape accussers.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 05:39 PM
0

The guy is Louis Walsh, he is Gay. This changes the context a lot.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 03:16 PM
3

The article and the panel are talking in an echo chamber. They are disconnected from reality and need to spend time outside their elite clique. History will look at them as appalling.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 06:01 PM
2

Alan Rock and the University of Ottawa are a disgrace and own the whole hockey team an apology on their knees.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 07:26 PM
2

A big law suit will discourage this.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:11 PM
2

I doubt this is even true:- In fact, no group is at greater risk of suicide than those who have previously tried to end their lives Gillard is the poster child of anti male bigotry.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:59 PM
3

Women also have rape fantasies.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:53 AM
2

This is false and based on cherry picked statistics, link:-
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:02 PM
1

There are very few cultural universals. Social norms are mostly arbitrary and agreed upon so we can get on with living our lives. Our world is becoming increasingly complex, any set of social norms are inevitably going to partly inconsistent; but again we tolerate this so we can get on with living our lives. Attacking a social norm's inconsistency is an easy form of 'activism'. SJW's use this tactic to replace social norms and social conventions for ideological reasons; the new set forced down o…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:45 PM
12

Bigotry and willful ignorance on an imcomprehensible level. They have become the very same as those they supposedly oppose.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 08:55 PM
48

I would walk out.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:24 PM
1

Excellently put together case.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:35 PM
1

Basically hate mongering and click bait using worn out arguments. She should be fired.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:33 AM
3

Ty :-)
/r/MensRights08/06/18 03:32 PM
8

It is behind a paywall
/r/MensRights08/06/18 03:15 PM
1

If it was Lehman sisters, they would be a single store pay day loan outfit in the mid-west.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:31 PM
1

Technically it does not say you can not park there. Call their bluff and park there; do a Rosa Parks. Complaining like hell in large numbers also works.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 05:28 PM
19

The DPP Allison Saunders recently said there were no innocent men in jail. She should resign immediately.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:01 PM
4

The flood gates may well be opening. This type of attitude and behaviour has become entrenched in US universities; this is only the tip of an ice berg. Obama's administration protected these people in the past.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:54 AM
1

I am aware of the political structure of Wales; both those parties have their political outlook as the result of powerful feminist lobbies. The feminist influence on Welsh politics is horrendous. The Carl Sargeant affair and the new Sex Ed program for schools being points in question. The Assembly is not representative of the peoples views in general. You can push the public only so far with these views before they revolt. The USA and Trump being an example.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:39 AM
5

The situation in Wales is abject and bare faced social engineering by influential and ideological lobbyists. I predict the public will revolt.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:56 PM
2

The female influenced "reasonable person" is at the root of much gender bigotry
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:40 AM
2

I question the whole framing of the question in the first place. Is there something called masculinity in the first place? If so, I would like to know what is meant by the term. The word and the whole concept is intended to be inflammatory and derogatory. If one is to debate such a concept then:- Define what is being meant by the word Toxic. What is meant is by the word Masculinity; demonstrate that such a concept is sufficiently meaningful for consideration. Do these definitions correspond to m…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:49 PM
2

Wow, a very compelling read.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:09 PM
2

...in meantime feminist are trying their damnedest to define "masculinity".
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:56 AM
2

I do not feel the same way as the OP but excellent meta discussion.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:48 AM
1

...says one of the worlds highest paid prostitutes. The protest in Cannes by "stars" is intellectually thin, disingenuous virtue signalling. Next they will be protesting the price of caviar and man servants.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:18 AM
8

This pretty well sums the whole issue up:- One potential explanation for this silence, Curnock Cook suggests, is that “it’s quite unfashionable to have views about the underperformance of men”.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:28 PM
1

That is a stock reply from their reframing manual.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:53 PM
2

Boys as a demographic as a whole are in trouble with education. Note how they focus it down to a demographic. It the statistics where the other way around there would be a national emergency for girls as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:04 PM
1

No different from the Chinese Cultural Revolution.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:40 PM
5

It seems a legal principal is a legal principal unless it comes round and bites you.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:11 PM
2

Striving for equality of outcome has historically proven to disastrous time and time again.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 01:54 PM
1

These are the journalists who created this witch hunt, now they complain when it comes back to eat their own.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:26 PM
7

Feminist inspired laws are puritanism disguised as progressiveness. As is, these laws clearly discourage common law relationships.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:23 PM
2

What happened to 'Believe the Victim'?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 05:05 AM
1

I found that paragraph chilling.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:34 PM
2

The response of the officials shows how bigotry is deeply entrenched in our institutions. Corruption is well known to rot a country's instutions from the inside; this type of thinking will do the same. Frankly, a Title IX complaint should be made against the Title IX official.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:17 PM
2

rotfl :-)
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:38 PM
3

This is the inevitable effect of having ideology derive policy. History has taught this lesson many times before.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:12 PM
2

Thank God!
/r/MensRights02/04/18 05:34 AM
8

It is an Orwellian redefinition of words. Rape and traditionaly meant to take away.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 04:50 PM
3

Lol, you are correct.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 03:39 PM
3

What happened to believe the victim principle?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:26 AM
12

A 6 year old has no control over what time he arrives at school.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 06:18 PM
5

Sponsored by major companies as well. Institutional sexism at the highest levels. They are public selling a service, is this legal?
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:15 PM
3

This is what diversity at Huffpo looks like: https://twitter.com/lheron/status/733758898855940098?lang=en
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:27 PM
1

Harriet Harmon's fact at t=444 is priceless. https://youtu.be/7cSrX2FJ-Q8?t=444
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:49 PM
3

In the meantime, feminists will be able to say what ever they wish about men.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:08 AM
0

They are indulging in the same "we know best" that they are accussing others of.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:07 PM
1

I doubt people would have problem with these types of things, if it was not for the utter unreasonablness of feminist forces when things are the other way around.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:51 PM
10

Gender Equity policies are a trick to double the work force by framing the issue as fairness. Women are being scammed.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:43 PM
3

Canada is going mad. I could write something insightful and clever, but frankly that sums it up.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:08 AM
3

Manipulation of language, Orwell warned about it and the feminism/left is doing it.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 03:16 AM
6

When is the womens only lounge at Berkeley Law school (Boalt College) going to be shut down. Definitely Title IX complaint material.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:15 PM
2

Thanks a lot! Links saved.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:07 AM
2

I did not think so. Yet this myth is prevalent? Has the scientific community again been derelict in its duty to society?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:05 AM
1

Interesting debate, but I feel they did not get to the bottom of these issues. Does circumcision actually reduce HIV?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:33 AM
1

Narcissist and Borderline personality almost for certain. I have worked with almost a carbon copy of this 'guy'. Horrendous. At least Google managed to fire this one.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:20 PM
1

Also in the news, birds flying south cause the leaves to fall off trees.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:27 PM
7

Best quote: This implies that political reasoning obviously does not operate from a “blank slate”, but in the context of the existing social institutions, constrained by a set of evolved adaptations, biases and inherited orientations that vary individually.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:41 PM
21

The SPLC is an utterly vile organisation.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:54 PM
5

Good god, what a load of bunkum. Bareley equal a high school science fair project.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:38 PM
0

?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:28 PM
1

The likes of you created this moral panic Sandburg. Deal with it, stop whining.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:48 PM
2

Brilliant, great video.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:44 AM
4

Good piece of investigative reporting. There are some nasty forces operating in Ontario, they should be rooted out.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:05 PM
3

This case is straight out of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. The points he is being fired for are demonstrable true, and he did just that. The rulings notwithstanding his effort to cloak his comments with 'scientific' references and analysis, would make Chairman Mao proud. Danmore was fired for indulging in Wrongspeak. It took China 15yrs to purge itself of this type of thing. We have a decade or so left.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 03:05 PM
3

Social engineers at work again. Before we know it, we will have no culture left at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:02 PM
1

ty. Terrible awful story that follows a sadly common pattern.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:53 PM
3

Where is the rest of the story?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:49 PM
1

I this Srtaughan is broadly correct. Society would revert to impulses governed by evolutionary psychology. This may work for hunter gatherers, but not for complex societies.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:30 PM
24

Complain. It is offensive.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:52 PM
4

This is utterly appalling. This is a schoolboy for gods sake. How many more cases are there like this? Allison Saunders has to go, she has created a lynch culture.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:53 AM
2

Social Engineering at its finest, the Cultural Revolution has begun. The schedule of Struggle Sessions will be announced soon..
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:14 PM
1

The school response is not strong enough, the teacher should be removed.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:12 AM
17

He is a disgusting fraud.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:23 AM
1

Nice use of language:- ...failed in its duty to protect against unlawful command influence as it “rationalized the error away as a benign effort to seek inclusiveness.”
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:37 AM
2

Behind pay wall.
/r/PussyPass04/02/18 11:06 PM
6

Huge pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass04/02/18 03:53 PM
1

Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 04:45 AM
136

Prudery disguised a progressiveness.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:09 AM
1

The inevitable effect of special interest group interference and an activist Director of the CPS. Alison Saunders should resign.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:07 PM
18

Saunders and the equally corrupt BBC are framing this as change in technology issue, when it is clearly a rush to prosecute issue. Saunders needs to resign.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:43 PM
3

1984
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:22 PM
18

The CPS should be made to explain themselves. They are paranoid over the treatment of the accussers but are blind to the plight of a 12yr old boy.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:20 PM
2

Wow! The word lynching comes to mind.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:42 AM
2

A anti-intellectual crap trap. She should be fired. (is this a repost)
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:11 PM
63

It gets worse:- https://brashfeminism.com/2018/01/22/women-please-pick-up-your-trash-it-makes-all-of-us-look-bad/
/r/MensRights22/01/18 09:58 PM
3

A complaint should be made to Channel 4 about their press release.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:36 PM
22

1 + 1 = Depends on my feelings
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:51 PM
52

A stupid solution to a made up problem.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:15 PM
11

Why is the woman not being prosecuted?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 09:50 PM
1

I disagree with the premise of the question. An even if they are, so what?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:06 PM
5

Favorite comment:- Nothing to worry about. Women who DON'T believe all this crap effortlessly outbreed those who DO. This is already happening. It is by its very nature doomed to be a phenomenom that only lasts one generation.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:16 AM
2

Will they change the name of the Bursary?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:38 AM
1

The two on the left are uniformed bigots. The guy on the right great.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 07:55 PM
1

They created this Brave New World, now live in it. Stop complaining.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 07:42 PM
47

If any old slag can go up to the bouncers and demand a man be thrown out, then I suggest people do not go to that night club. The slag in question gets off scot free as usual.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 06:53 PM
14

The Benevolent Sexism argument is a largely internally consistent set of ideas with no connection to most peoples perception of reality or understanding of language. To add the argument's allure they add some noun phrases, eg ambivalent sexism, and make it emotionally satisfying to those they are appealing to. The whole concept is intellectually corrupt, self serving, dishonestly framed verbal gymnastics. It is straight out the propaganda manuals developed by Lippman and Bernays; it is the very …
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:16 PM
2

Tragic beyond words.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 04:19 AM
45

and often hinge on the contradictory accounts of the alleged suspect and the complainant about what has taken place. Interesting use of language by the Metropolitan Police. Presumably this will revert to victim and accused when all this blows over.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:03 AM
2

Cases of regret and revenge should gathered and forwarded to the CPS. This a Government site, the statement is irresponsible,
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:41 PM
6

The core reason behind the Liam Allan case is that the police are under enormous pressure to get rape prosecutions. It is then inevitable there will an urge to find innocent men guilty. The lack of disclosure is only a symptom of a deeper issue. Saunders should be fired, she has brought the justice system into disrepute.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:15 PM
1

This is a great site. I have not seen it before.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:43 AM
5

I have posted this as all other links on the internet seemed to have been scrubbed.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:20 PM
1

This story is terrible, but even worse is that it has been purged from the internet. The only link still left is:- HERE
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:17 PM
1

Well done!
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:46 PM
1

Article has been removed?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 08:48 PM
2

It is a list of approved thought. Soon it will be published in a little Red Book.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:21 PM
2

I question both the statistic and the fact it deters women from coming forward. Are they trying to create a self fulling prophecy? It is craven propaganda, it is shameful.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:49 AM
7

This is disturbing on so many levels. Levels that dive down to the very basis of our justice system.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:48 PM
17

From the article:- Marriner says charges are usually only laid in 15 to 20 per cent of sexual assault charges, and that those low levels deter women from coming forward. How the fuck do they know that?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:46 PM
14

Copied from another source:- The working paper by Peggy McIntosh (1988) was not published in a refereed journal. McIntosh added Notes for Facilitators in 2010. Item thirteen (13) is: "Do not get trapped in definitions of privilege and power. They lack nuances and flexibility." That caveat is often forgotten. Within academia (or closely related circles) it is generally understood that all words ("signs") need to be understood from a perspective that does not "trap" us in lack of nuance. But when …
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:10 AM
1

And so the Talibanisation of the UK gathers steam.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 07:47 PM
1

Police found Del Viscio outside the flat with blood on her teeth and face. Good god.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 07:32 PM
0

All movements have narratives, the degree to which they are merely cathartic is another thing.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:18 PM
5

cathartic narrative[s] These are the bread and butter of these social movements, and straight out of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. As soon as they lose these, they will lose massive support; regardless of the merit of their case.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 10:10 PM
2

All of of this type thing shows the effect of the media molding social norms then thus laws. It is straight out of what Chomsky and Bernays say. There are a myriad of minor social irritants that could framed as 'emergencies', eg purses on seats. The Men's movement needs to realise this this. The way to affect the media and the political elites is through what Chomsky calls Flack, ie complain like heck. The root way to get this happening is to promote the Men's Movement in universities. SJW's kno…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:03 PM
5

The 99 not coming forward does not change, or excuse, the fact that the young man's life is ruined. Trudeau shows a shocking lack of compassion.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:58 PM
4

If it legal or not, get this to the local media. Bad PR and controversy can move mountains. The story is horrible.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:46 AM
4

People must be careful not to feed the monster here. The feminist 'theologians' relish this type of post. Their argument goes like this:- Women fear men becuase of rape, sexual assault, sexism, toxic masculinty and patriarchy. Men must therefore be made to fear women. This apparently evens up the equation. Much of the sexual assualt hysteria is a contructed moral panic, more rooted in emotional satisfaction than anything else. This is not to say there are no terrible men, there are. There are al…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:41 PM
1

Society can only function if it has social norms. These norms are built on inescapable realities but also have an element arbitrariness to them, hence different cultures. All these people are trying to do is create another sets of norms. These norms are as arbitrary as anything else around, they also largely defy reality. They are badly designed and self serving. Imposing new social norms on a society does not work, they must evolve overtime with consensus. Otherwise it is Hegemony. History has …
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:39 PM
2

Reading some Bernays, Lippman and Chomsky will expose the deep subtext here.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:17 PM
1

You are right, but you need a few people like her any debate. She is an important counter measure.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:10 PM
0

Lol, Coulter is great. Sadly the audience, many of whom I am sure are wonderful people, as simply not equipped to discuss these isuues rationally.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:33 PM
1

Lol, click baiting for attention. Her writing and speaking gigs are drying up as she becomes increasingly irrelevent. Luckily she married a rich husband, hypergamy at its finest.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:01 PM
2

Masculinity A nebulous, essentially meaningless word whose definition changes to fit the argument. Don't let people frame a debate by using this word.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:28 PM
1

70 days seems excessive.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:14 PM
1

The BBC has become a vile, ideologically addled anachronism.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:08 PM
1

Here we go. They appeared on the rapid transit sytem DART in Dallas, 2008. There was a big reaction, and rightly so. https://jsoltys.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/finally-the-end-of-the-sexist-dart-ads/
/r/MensRights30/10/17 05:12 PM
6

Kudo's to the Family Place.They have certainly improved since the awful anti-male ad campaign they put out a few years ago. Credit is due here, well done Family Place.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:49 PM
1

This woman is using a classic Gish Gallop.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:57 PM
36

The last sentence sort of spoilt the article:- Gender equality will remain elusive until boys are as excited as girls about becoming teachers, nurses and full-time parents.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:01 PM
2

Brown must have had some pressure on him. Him doing this is is unbelievable.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:33 PM
1

He should ask the Murdoch University admin for comment.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:48 PM
2

Foss highlighted the fact that sex assault victims often don’t recall details or show obvious emotion afterwards. Some even try to repair the relationship with the attacker, if it is someone close to them There is no evidence to support this at all.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 03:15 PM
10

Note the framing mechanism here, ie identifying problems in subcategories of males; despite the fact the figures for males as whole are in a significant deficit. This is to minimise the problems of education for men in general. If this was the other way around it would be a problem for the category 'female', period. An example being domestic violence, which is overwhelmingly associated with:- lower socioeconomic status, alcohol, drug use, being unmarried, young and general social dis-functionali…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:19 AM
7

Feminist 'statisticians' will add this ace to the column of men who got away with rape. Seriously, they will.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:07 PM
5

Note the endless explaination for these numbers. If this was the other way round there would be one explaination:- Oppression
/r/MensRights20/09/17 10:04 PM
6

The fact there is not overwhelming and across the board criticism of this pricing stunt is a sad commentary on society. More precisely a sad commentary on the elites who control the narrative. We are spiralling into absurdity. The "death threat" diversion is becoming tiresome. This Hiraz guy is noted for these type of stunts.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:47 PM
1

It must be possible to write a computer program to generate this type of hog wash.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 07:38 PM
5

Vitualy all social norms are entirely arbitrary, especially those with regard to criminality. Passing soul responsibilty onto the male is a bare faced and hypocritical manipulation of these norms.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:57 PM
1

I am suprised by this case. The N. England CPS has a history of not prosecurting false rape acussers. This is uplifting, perhaps there has been a memo from higher up.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:54 PM
1

This is how propaganda and totalitarian control works. If, basically through repetition of an idea, you can get people to believe obviously absurd notions, then you can get them to reflexively believe absoultely anything.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:10 PM
6

The headline should read:- "Students are outraged at Politician who holds views they disagree with being invited to speak at their university"
/r/MensRights15/09/17 04:22 PM
5

What do they refer to dildo manufacturers as?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:39 PM
2

What the hell is "Masculinity" to start with, let alone a toxic version of it? This a festival of Orwellian distortion of language and intellectually dishonest framing devices.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:36 PM
2

A large number of people no longer take the SPLC seriously.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:10 PM
2

Since when does the Women’s Leadership Group run politics in Liverpool. We live in a democracy and have a ballot box.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:05 PM
2

This is basically the feminist commissars issuing fatwahs on how men are to behave. It is all a bit like the Chinese Cultural Revolution.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:04 PM
2

More washroom pettiness that gives feminism a bad name.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 09:40 PM
1

Why do you wait a month for returned bail money?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 11:17 AM
2

I had never come across Joanna Williams before. She has thought many issues through very carefully.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:42 PM
1

An attempt at creating social norms for defining criminality. Insidious,
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:59 PM
1

she acts in regards to gossip and slander the same way a highschool girl does. Reminds me of the malignant-narcissist. They are character assassins. As I said, keep cool and document things.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 08:57 PM
2

We learnt to document everything, keep a diary. Also very important, as soon as people start throwing shit around, the first thing that is lost is the truth. So keep your head and do not get draw into mud slinging, keep everything on the subject at hand. Do not feed their disorder, keep your interactions bland and brief. I have dealt with some pretty awful people, they exist in all organisations. People with personality disorders however are in a different league. Most people have not knowingly …
/r/MensRights20/08/17 08:24 PM
2

I have a strong attachment to Wales after having once lived there for many years. I follow Welsh politics fairly closely and am becoming more and more despairing with the Marxist-Feminist influence. Llywelyn ap Iorwerth, Owain Glyn Dwr and Gwynfor Evans would be mortified at the nut jobs who emerged in the confusion of Devolution. Hopefully time will bring some sense to all of this.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:28 PM
0

Sounds like a personality disorder. I suggest you look up them up, usually people are a mixture. Knowing what you dealing with makes finding a solution easier. These are extremely destructive people, you cannot just hope it goes away. Talking to HR might help.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:15 PM
2

More girls still got top grades. The increase in boys is the % of them getting top grades. There are still far more girls taking A levels in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:04 AM
2

Funny ha ha. It clearly was not a joke.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:54 PM
13

I liked this paragraph:- We all have our theories about why these moral crazes are suddenly so common. I’d say that radical uncertainty about morality, meaning and life in general is producing intense anxiety. Some people embrace moral absolutism in a desperate effort to find solid ground. They feel a rare and comforting sense of moral certainty when they are purging an evil person who has violated one of their sacred taboos.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:29 PM
1

Luis Reyva and this paper represents just about everything that is wrong about Academia and present political debate. The word charlatan comes to mind.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:59 PM
1

These types of letters have an affect and are important. Overtime, the media does react to what is know as "flack". Each letter may seem small but their effect builds up. Kudos to the author.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:39 PM
2

They made complete fools of themselves. Their report was so bad it had to be edited into oblivion.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:19 PM
3

USC Title IX Office is an odious, Orwellian organization. They have a history of this type of thing, LINK. The Title IX Office is part of the Office of Equity and Diversity which comprises of 10 women and 1 man. Perhaps they should practice what they preach.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:45 AM
2

I was, and probably still am, an expert in the Wikipedia rules. It does not matter, knowledge of the law does not protect you against corruption.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 12:54 AM
1

All of Wikipedia is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 12:52 AM
1

"Equality of Outcome" goes out of the window when it does not serve their purposes.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:31 PM
9

The past tense was inferred.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:38 PM
11

At a deeper level this type thing is no different to the racially segregated bathrooms in the Deep South.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 02:37 PM
6

But 30 did not.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:24 PM
2

Yet when it comes to the lack of male teachers they use the best person for the job argument.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:56 PM
5

It is rather like asking what rights don't Blacks have in the USA. The Law and the way the Law is actually applied are two different things.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:23 PM
2

What an astonishingly badly argued article. The graduation ceremony video demonstrates the quality of graduate we are producing these days.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:43 AM
3

Capitalism loves feminism, it has doubled the work force and thus reduced labor costs. This is why it now requires two wage earners to run a family. It has also forced the population to argue amongst themselves - about gender identity, public toilets and pronouns - rather than consider more weighty issues that might effect the elites. Jonathan Swift would have a ball if he was alive today.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:23 PM
1

"Man hater" or "Male Bashing" are still my favorite phrases.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:49 PM
1

Excellent synopsis of some important ideas and mechanisms that are alive and well today. Good find.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:32 PM
1

When people repond with 'Uh' and finish with "Those are just shit-stupid anaolgies", I have generally made a good point .
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:09 PM
1

Just another $97 Million to dissappear into the Congo's hell hole of corruption and kick backs.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:07 PM
1

Preumable then Gerintologists should be over 80 and Psychiatrists should be crazy.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:54 PM
2

Here is one more:- Ex-lieutenant-governor Lise Thibault begins prison sentence in Quebec City.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:28 PM
1

Thoughtful post.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:14 PM
1

Both men believe something has gone wrong on college campuses––that a strain of illiberalism advanced by a vocal minority of students is ascendant; that it is substantively wrong; and that most administrators and faculty are averse to speaking up. Good fucking grief. And these people are supposedly indepenent thinkers?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:13 PM
8

The welfare of boys is off the radar, it does not fit the narrative presently in vogue with the media and the elites. Only when the situation gets to point of creating wide spread public outrage and disgust will anything be done about it.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:35 PM
2

A classic "define a word in a manner the respondents would not, without telling them" survey. I thought surveys done by universities had to go through ethics committees first?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:40 PM
2

Interesting article. I am not usually a fan of Ginsburg but I take my hat off to here here. A few statements caught my eye in including:- At the core of Ruth Ginsburg’s lifelong project is the conviction that there should be no separate spheres for men and women in the eyes of the law, and that distinctions based on what “most” men or women do, on the choices that “most” of them make, is an obstacle to full legal equality.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:52 AM
6

In the general context of domestic violence, death via an intimate partner is very uncommon. Also, in a general sense, death via an intimate partner is extremely uncommon, it is the same range as death by falling out of bed. "Overwhelming" is a highly subjective term. A factor of 2 or 3 is arguably not overwhelming, especially as murder by proxy is not recorded in these figures and we are dealing with low numbers. Domestic violence related deaths are not overwhelming committed by men when you in…
/r/MensRights09/06/17 10:05 AM
4

This is a situation where you can carefully pick you terms (or definitions) to get the result you want. Nicely put.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:36 AM
2

Best of luck!
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:20 AM
2

Fantastic, well deserved!!!
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:14 PM
25

Title IX comlplaint if in the USA. Charter complaint if in Canada. Someone needs to do this else they will walk all over people.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:04 PM
1

If Mathers was a feminist professor this would not even had made the news. If it had, shouts of misogyny in defense of the professor would sounded loud and clear. Mathers has lost her livelyhood and reputation. She is ruined.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:51 PM
1

Using this tragedy to make political hay is despicable.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:28 PM
43

Is this a Title IX issue?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:29 PM
2

A complaint must be made by some one in Europe.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:10 PM
1

I would not go to the Summit for even €85, it is awful.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:09 PM
1

The stats on false rape accusations must be kept low as possible. This one will be marked up in the "rapist not taken to court" column.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:50 PM
2

Basically, people in the UK have to complain vigorously about this.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:12 PM
1

Obviously fake.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:06 PM
3

This looks fake to me.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:23 AM
3

WAGGGS ROTFL
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:05 PM
1

Feminist Current is truly a vile publication. The comments section give you an idea of the type of people who regulary read it.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:30 PM
30

This type of thing is and has been going on for ages. Many of these organisations are fronts for political activism. Well spotted.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 06:13 PM
2

r/thatHappened
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:48 AM
15

The crimalisation of predominantly male anti-social behavior is as old as time itself and the backbone of modern western justice systems. Men are more of a threat to those in power than women, hence are kept in place via the law more strictly. Malicious gossip, cuckolding, false rape accusations etc. can ruin a persons life yet receive little to no legal sanction.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:44 AM
2

I have worked with a BPD, it is beyond comprehension how destrictive they are.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:22 PM
2

There seems to be a fair amount of concern trolling and brigading going on here.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 10:51 PM
2

Orwellian language distortion. What the hell is masculinity, let alone an insecurity about it? Don't buy these intellectually dishonest framing devices. These people are masters of the 'have you stopped beating your wife' research questions.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 02:50 AM
3

Excelent post - saved.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 04:44 PM
1

SheBagging Excellent word
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:00 PM
2

Did not show up in other dicusions tab. Why?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:03 PM
1

rhetorical disguise Excellent phrase.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:56 PM
8

He is however correct.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:43 AM
7

There is no such thing as Toxic Masculinity. It's just another meaningless noun phrase. Beware of of noun phrases eg:- Wage Gap Rape Crisis Male Privilege War on Drugs Noun phrases are the stocking trade of the propagandist and the backroom stratergist; treat them with suspicion. They are used to frame the debate. "He who frames the question wins the debate." - Randall Terry
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:40 PM
0

.. I will leave that as an excercise for you.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:15 PM
2

There might be a little bit of hair splitting on your part there.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:54 PM
4

The Feminist lobby and the media exert enourmous power over politics.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:33 PM
2

Masculinity should not even be framed this way. The debate suggests that there is something called masculinity that can be defined and then expected of men. Do not fall for this canard.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:53 PM
3

The CBC Canada is a shameless and disgusting propaganda machine. I refuse to listen to it anymore.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:22 PM
1

I do not see this as uplifting news, a cheer-leading team is exactly the sort of thing feminist SJW's would target. Now if it was a feminist debate team sanctioned for a road trip misadventure it would be different.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:52 AM
1

Could be a "Streisand Effect" here with a bit of luck.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:45 AM
1

Anything concerning Money, Contracts, Construction and Government = Corruption.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 02:42 PM
1

This is an interesting example of pussypass justice. Precedent setting and an incite in the values sytems driving our justice.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:46 PM
4

“Hotels, taxi companies and other licensed premises’ have recently been equipped with the right knowledge to identify children who could be at risk of exploitation under Operation Makesafe.” No they have not, else this would not have happened.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter